Summary of the 21st Toki Conference on

Integration of Fusion Science and Technology for Steady State Operation
J. Jacquinot
Cabinet of the French High Commissioner for Atomic Energy
CEA, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Abstract: This summary is based on 240 papers presented at the 21st Toki conference
held on November 28th to December 1st 2011. It registered a record level ofattendance and dealt with a wide range of fusion science and technology aspects forsteady state operation which constitutes the greatest challenge on the way to the
production of fusion energy on an industrial scale. Prominent aspects reported
include the physics scenarios for SSO (Steady State Operation) which has to integrate
in a coherent way challenging technologies. These include the technology of materials
for structural and first wall components, superconductors for magnetic confinement,
plasma heating systems. A considerable effort is being made to integrate theknowledge acquired in these fields into large experiments. The construction andoperation of a new generation of fusion machines based on superconducting magnets
has made good progress and long pulses operation demonstrate the progress made on
SSO in an integrated way. They now reach the GJ level in extracted energy at plasma
parameters significantly more relevant than previously. However, the ITER goal of
500 GJ is still far away and in view of the distance to travel, the level of activity in thisarea of research is expected to grow considerably in the years to come. The projectionof present day knowledge to a DEMO fusion reactor is now being addressed by newly
formed research groups.
Keywords: Fusion energy, magnetic confinement, steady state operation, tokamaks,
helical systems, ITER, heating, current drive, stability, plasma wall interactions,materials, superconductors, divertors, limiters.
1. Introduction
The 21st International Toki Conference (ITC 21) was held between 28 November and1st December 2011 in Toki Japan. Its scientific organisation had chosen a generalscheme addressing the “Integration of Fusion Science and Technology for SteadyState Operation” which is now considered to be an essential issue in the critical pathfor fusion development. This is indeed a major stated objective for a new generation offusion machines using superconducting technology which gives the inherent potential
for full steady state operation (SSO). The conference attracted a record number ofparticipants (284) coming from 14 countries. All SSO issues were addressed, thepresentations dealing with topics ranging very broadly from confinement physics toenabling technologies, from experiments to theory (including modelling andsimulation) and from DEMO concepts to cross cutting aspects between fusion andother fields.

1Table 1: Comparison of the energy extracted in present experiments (highest values)
to the goals for ITER and DEMO. E/Spl is the energy normalized to the plasma surface.
DeviceEnergyGoal
EnergyAchieved
E/Spl(MJ/m2)Tore Supra
Tokamak
10MWx1000s=10 GJ

LHD
ITER
Heliotron
3MWx3600s 500MWx1000s= 10.8 GJ= 500 GJ

1. GJ

1.6 GJ

10

17

700

DEMO
∞

∞

The challenge of SSO is illustrated on Table 1 which compares the energy extracted inpresent experiments from LHD (T. Mutoh PL-1) and Tore Supra (G. Hoang I-6) to the
ITER full performance objective. In absolute term, a progress of about a factor 300 is
required. However, it is more meaningful to compare the extracted energy normalized
to the plasma surface (E/Spl). The comparison is more favourable in these terms but
still a factor of about 40 is needed. Therefore there is a long way to go! This becomeseven clearer when inspection of the plasma parameters obtained during theseexperiments (in particular the normalized plasma pressure beta) reveals that they are
far away from the reactor regime. Nevertheless, the values obtained are improving all
the time and this was apparent in this conference. The reason for limitation in pulse
duration is not generally due to a single cause and when a particular cause is removed,
soon appears another one or a combination of causes. The exact reason is not always
clear but the most often stated causes are:
(1) Limitation on the specification of one of the machine systems (field,
pumping, heating, current drive, plasma control)(2) Overheating of a first wall component (insufficient active cooling or
improper accounting of the power distribution on first wall components)
often creating hot spots(3) Impurity influx due to (2) or to a particular plasma wall interaction i. e.
from heating systems(4) Radiation collapse due to an ‘UFO’ (unidentified flying object) often
coming from the detachment of a fragment of a deposited layer on a firstwall component (flakes).
(5) Spontaneous change of the plasma state. This may be due to coupling ofslow growing instabilities to causes (2) to (4) identified above or to theinterplay between the equilibrium slowly varying on a resistive time scale
and plasma instabilities.
Cause (1) has now been eliminated from the machines of the modern generation but
causes (2) to (5) are still impeding further progress in performance. They imply both
physics and technology and, more importantly, their integration in a single device for a2

well controlled plasma state. It is the intention of this summary to highlight issues andprogress in understanding and in eliminating in practice the limitations.

2. Overall progress in SSO experiments
A first striking observation is the successful advances or completion of the newdevices based on superconducting technology. The torus of W7X is now closed andST1 is nearing completion. A major breakthrough is that EAST (X. Gong PL-3) and
KSTAR (H. Park PL-4) are now in full scientific exploitation thus demonstrating forthe first time the operation and control of tokamaks operated with superconducting
coils producing both the toroidal and poloidal fields. EAST and KSTAR have bothproduced H modes. EAST has developed hundred-second-long divertor plasmas and8s H modes (X. Gong PL-3); the performance is presently limited by overheating of
the graphite of some components.
LHD, the large helical device in Toki, which is intrinsically a steady state device,
has continued to lead the field of long pulse operation reaching one hour operation and
1.6 GJ of extracted power (fig. 1). The triple product neτETi has now reached3.5x1018m-3.s.keV (T. Mutoh PL-1). The unplanned plasma termination can beproduced by flakes or by sparks in the IC antenna. A burst of EC power has been used
to burn off the flakes thus recovering normal operation. The situation was markedly
improved using a dipole antenna which launches a higher k spectrum. Similarly, ToreSupra (fig. 2) has reproduced its 1GJ shots but has done so at higher density andhigher plasma current. The improved plasma parameters were achieved with the new
LHCD system connecting a new set of 3.7 GHz klystrons to an ITER relevant PAM
launcher which is actively cooled.

Injected energy [GJ]2
LHD 2006
1.5
LHD 2004

20111

Tore Supra

0.5

LHD (ECH)

JT-60
JET

0
10

1min

HT-7

TRIAM-1M
1hour
1day
4

10
100
1000
10
Plasma duration time [s]5Figure 1 Overall results of long pulse operation (T. Mutoh PL-1)

3

Figure 2: Overall results of long pulse operation of tokamaks with LHCD (T. Hoang I6) (Reproduced from T. Hoang, Plasma and Fusion Research to be published)

3. Theory, modelling, computing.
On the theoretical and modelling side, the present challenges are two folds on one
hand the new phase in fusion research requires to integrate in a coherent package thecomplex interplay of present knowledge on equilibrium, instability and transport and,on the other hand, first principle descriptions of the key physics phenomena which arestill not available. For instance, first principle predictions for ITER of the H-mode
power threshold and of RMP ELM mitigations are still missing. This conference
benefitted from 48 input papers on theory and modelling. It thus provided a goodmeasure of the progress made and of the one which remains to be made.
C. Chang (I-17), focussing on extreme multiscale numerical computation and gave acomprehensive illustration of a coherent package integrating a wide range of physics
phenomena involving very different scales.
A full-f gyrokinetic codes XGC1 and a kinetic guiding centre code XGC0 have beendeveloped leading to:- Whole-volume kinetic first-principles simulation of turbulence in realistic
diverted magnetic geometry- Observation of a globally stiff Ti profile in a flux-driven system- Plasma momentum generation in the edge and its inward pinch

4

- Pedestal growth- RMP penetration, consistently with pedestal transport/evolution.
The results already obtained are impressive and account for a wealth of observations.
The key question which remains is the extent of the predictive capability of the codes;
for instance is it possible to demonstrate the switch to H-mode and to predict
accurately its threshold for ITER?
H. Sugama (I-16) dealt with kinetic simulations of neoclassical and anomaloustransport processes in helical systems. Using a gyrokinetic theory and simulation of
ITG turbulence, he showed that the neoclassical optimization of magnetic field
configurations enhances the generation of zonal flows and hence the regulation of
turbulent transport. This result is a rather direct consequence of the radial electric field
generated by the ambipolarity condition in helical systems.
F. Waelbroeck (O-19) addressed the problem of the plasma response to magnetic
perturbations which is so essential in the ELM mitigation problem. He gave generalconsiderations showing that fusion grade plasmas are resilient to mode penetration.
The very disparate time scales involved, 104 in size and 105 in time, are at the limit ofnonlinear initial value codes so he used the singular layer approach which shows thatthe field is screened at the resonance but amplified away from it. A particle pump out
is produced which needs, for stabilisation, to act on the pedestal width as well as on
gradients. It scales unfavourably with ρ*.
Finally, V. Decik (I-15) discussed the revolution in computing ahead of us bydeveloping codes and hardware which minimizes the memory access time. The use of
GPU (graphical processing units) looks very promising for a number of applications.

4. Shaping, conditioning and divertor aspects.
Wall conditioning and the thermal loading on first wall components especially thedivertor are essential issues for CW operation of fusion machines. This section gathers
the related aspects presented at the conference. Interestingly, the effects of plasma anddivertor geometries have been revisited and novel ideas have emerged for optimisingplasma properties and reducing the thermal load. We first deal with them before
moving on to conditioning.
A. Pochelon (I-2) used the great flexibility of plasma shaping on TCV to provide
physics insight on its effect on plasma properties. Plasma elongation was varied from
0.9 to 2.8 and triangularity δ from -0.7 to +1 (positive values correspond to the ITERcase). Core confinement and edge pedestal in H mode exhibit strong variations with δ:core confinement degrades with increasing triangularity whilst, in H-mode, thedivertor thermal loading due to ELMs increases. The behaviour in the core isreminiscent of the effects of trapped electron modes but is still a puzzle in view of thelimited penetration of triangularity in the core. GK simulations can explain such5behaviour by showing that the turbulent eddies generated in the edge extend deep inthe core. The behaviour of the pedestal is compatible with ideal MHD stability.
Spherical tokamaks (M. Bell I-1, H. Meyer I-5) as well as TCV (A. Pochelon I-2) havedevoted considerable attention to reducing the thermal loading on the divertor. In
addition to ELM mitigation and radiation increase in the divertor region, this can beachieved by optimising the divertor geometry for a larger wetted area. H. Meyer (I-5)
described a “super x” divertor geometry which is being conceived for installation in
the upgrade of Mast. It provides a large flux expansion and a long connection length
thus reducing the heat load by a factor 4. Particular attention was given to the effect oferror fields and ripples which could pose a problem.

Figure 3: Top plot: Snowflake divertor configuration used in NSTX (M. Bell, I-1).
Bottom plot: Measured heat flux before and during the snowflake configuration.

6

(Original data published in R. Raman et al., Nucl. Fusion 51 (2011) 094011 and S.
Gerhardt et al., Nucl. Fusion 51 (2011) 073031)
In a comprehensive review of NSTX results, M. Bell (I-1) also dealt with plasma
shaping, mode control and divertor geometry. He emphasized the importance oflithium coated PFC’s in increasing confinement, widening the edge pedestal andprogressively reducing ELMs. NSTX is now undergoing a major upgrade for
operating at higher plasma current and with a reduced collisionality. It is planned toresume operation in 2014 with a 2nd beam box and a new centre stack. Strategies arebeing developed to mitigate the very high divertor heat fluxes in NSTX-U, including using a"snowflake" (higher multipole magnetic field null) divertor configuration. As shown in Figure 3,
this has produced a significant reduction of the divertor heat flux in NSTX. Similar
configurations have been studied in TCV and MAST.

Emphasis on divertor geometry is also a central piece of the future plans on LHD (T.
Mutoh PL-1) with the construction of a closed helical divertor together with active
pumping which is expected to improve the control of density at the edge and toincrease the recycling in the divertor region thus enhancing radiation and avoiding
peaked thermal loading.
I. Tolstihina (O-5) pointed out the importance of the isotopic effect on charge
exchange in slow collisions of Li, Be, C and W ions with H, D and T which haveresonant channels. This effect could be large and should be taken into account insimulations. Experimental confirmation of the calculations appears required.
H. Takeda (O-6) described divertor simulation studies using the Tsukuba GAMMA 10
end-mirror cell. A heat flux of 0.8 MW/m2 and a particle flux of 6.5 1022 particle.m-2
were observed. There is scope for a significant increase of the particle flux withadditional plasma heating in the end mirror region.
5. Elm mitigation.
T. Evans I-3 gave an overview of the suppression of Edge Localised Modes (ELMs) in
the DIII-D tokamak with its flexible system producing 3D magnetic field perturbations.
Without any mitigation methods, large ELMs would be expected in ITER which
would impede the longevity of the divertor. The DIII-D set-up can produce either anarrow stochastic layer (small islands) with a top/down antisymetric field or a wideedge stochastic layer (large overlapping islands) with a symmetric configuration. The
ELM suppression in this later case appears to be compatible with ITER low
collisionality conditions. The ELM suppressed regime is quite stationary in contrast
with the ELM-free regime where the density rises continuously. The ELM suppression
which occurs at a well defined q value at the edge is correlated with a reduction of thecurrent and particle gradients. It is very encouraging that ELM suppression has beenobtained with all ITER reduced parameters except ρ* which is not accessible. The
ITER RMP coil design (figure 4) is capable of exceeding the DIII-D suppression
criterion by more than 50% under all anticipated ITER scenarios

7Figure 4: ITER internal coil design capable of producing a broad range of magnetic
perturbations at the edge (n=1, 2, 3 and 4)

6. Diagnostics, instrumentation and control.
Over the last decades, there has been a continuous revolution in the ability to diagnose
fusion plasmas. It was fed both by a growing insight of basic plasma processes and by
the exponentially increasing power of electronic data processing. Real time dataprocessing for feedback control has now reached such a power that it is now anessential tool of all plasma operations. It is indispensable for SSO work. A good
example of this is the real time surveillance of the Tore Supra PFCs with infrared
cameras for power and temperature management. This conference has provided a rich
input on the evolution of advanced diagnostics; in particular T. Estrada (I-8) reviewed
microwave reflectometry worldwide. Progress was achieved both on the conventional
set-up with very fast systems for measuring density and turbulence and on Doppler
systems which give new information on plasma flows. Density profiles are now
measured with excellent temporal and spatial resolution and the dynamics ofturbulence becomes accessible. Describing the ITER reflectometric system, she
stressed the challenges for future devices where relativistic effects modify strongly theresonances and cut-off frequencies thus preventing access to the plasma core from thelow field side (LFS). HFS launch has to be used. ITER will also use reflectometry for
position control during SSO. The principle was demonstrated in AUG.
H. Park (PL-4) gave the latest developments of the KSTAR 2D ECE imaging systems(ECEI). Sawteeth, a new core instability and ELM growth and stabilisation can bevisualized in striking details. A second ECEI system located at a different toroidal
position is being commissioned for providing 3D reconstructions of MHD instabilities.

8A. Melnikov (O-3) reviewed plasma electric potential measurements in 4 devices (T10, TJ-II, CHS and LHD. Heavy Ion Beam Probing was used to provide a good spatial(1cm) and temporal (1μs) resolution of the plasma electric potential and density. Allfour machines show striking similarities: when ne increases, the potential grows morenegative and is associated with better confinement. Conversely, the potential goes up
with ECRH. Neoclassical predictions are compatible with the observed behaviour.
Finally, I. Yonegawa (I-9) from the ITER international organisation described the
instrumentation and control for ITER long pulse operation. He stressed the challenge
of integrating by a central system many systems procured ‘in-kind’ with their own
local controllers. A plant control handbook defines precisely the standard which ismandatory for all systems. The architecture including a thousand computers has been
defined. Many technologies have been selected and a number of pilot projects havebeen initiated for validating the selected technologies.

7. Heating systems.
There have been no drastic changes in the performance of the 4 usual heating andcurrent drive systems but steady progress is noted. The methods have their advantage
and drawbacks and it is not envisaged to only rely on a single method. IC and LHCD
are presently well suited for achieving steady state operation but need to improve on
coupling and on minimizing edge effects in particular on plasma purity. EC and NBI
do not have a coupling problem but are still significantly far from achieving therequired long pulse operation on plasmas. The progress on gyrotrons is illustrated on
figure 5.

9Figure 5: Status of long pulse operation of gyrotrons for magnetic fusion (T. Mutoh
PL-1)
T. Mutoh (PL-1) reported that the LHD EC system has been successfully upgraded to
4MW and a very high electron temperature of 25keV has been achieved with 3.7 MWof coupled power albeit at a rather low density of 2.1018 m-3. The upgraded NBI
system (16 MW of N-NBI at 180 keV, 13 MW of P-NBI at 40-60 keV) combined with
reduced recycling obtained with ICH wall conditioning, allowed an ion temperature of
7 keV to be achieved. New IC antennas were installed to provide a high parallel wave
number. In combination with EC, it allowed higher plasma densities to be sustained
but plasma was terminated by a sudden influx of iron when a spark on the antenna
occurred.
T. Hoang (I-6), on behalf of an international task force, gave an overview on the
progress of LHCD for long pulse tokamak operation. The overall results on
experiments are summarized on figure 2. ITER scenarios including LHCD show that
longer burn durations would be achieved by using it for saving volt seconds during thecurrent ramp-up phase and driving current in the plasma periphery (r/a ~ 0.7) during
the burn phase thus tailoring the non inductive drive in advanced tokamak modes. This
forms the scientific basis for the design of a 20 MW LHCD system for ITER using 48
klystrons of 500 kW of the type prototyped by the KSTAR group. Prototypes of CW
windows and mock-ups of a 5 GHz mode converter have also been manufactured by
the Tore Supra team.
S. Shiraiwa (I-4) focussed on the understanding of the decrease of LHCD efficiency athigh density which is observed for instance on Alcator-C-mod. Modelling using an
advanced full wave code indicates parasitic absorption at the edge. This effect isreduced when single pass absorption in the plasma core is large. It should not happen
in ITER conditions where the single pass absorption is predicted to be large.
A. Isayama (O-7) described the plans for the ECH system for JT-60SA. The system
will have the multiple functions to heat, stabilize instabilities, plasma initiation andwall cleaning. The goal is to install 7 MW/100s in 9 units. At present, 1 MW for 31s
and 1.5 MW for 4s have been achieved. Dual frequency gyrotrons at 110 GHz and 138
GHz are being developed for providing the possibility of core heating at 2.3T. The
launcher and the power supplies are also progressing. For the W7X EC system, M.
Hirsch (O-9) indicated the strategy to cope with the microwave stray radiation which
poses a serious risk of damages of components during long pulse operation.
M. Wada (O-8) described the development of SSO ion sources for ITER NBI systems.
Sources with the required current density have been demonstrated but reduction of thetungsten evaporation and of the caesium consumption need to be achieved.
Following a different track from the usual RF systems, H. Idei (I-7) described thephysics of electron Bernstein wave heating and current drive (EBWH and EBCD). He
demonstrated that the waves are well adapted to the low field of the new spherical

10tokamak in Kyushu, QUEST, using the TRIAM 8.2 GHz system. A CW phased array
antenna was developed and non inductive plasma current start-up and sustainment
experiments were performed. About 15 kA for 100 kW were achieved (start-up andsustained). The duration reached ~ 37 s but was limited by impurity contamination.
8.56 GHz 250kW klystrons are being developed for the next phase.

8. Superconductors.
M. Noe and P. Komarek (PL-6) provided a highly documented history ofsuperconductivity applied to fusion magnets (figure 6) and then moved on to discussed
the future. This history is marked with very successful completions of several
superconducting machines starting in 1978 with T7 (figure 6). For instance, ToreSupra, since 1988, and LHD, since 1998, are performing very reliably since theircommissioning. More recently EAST and KSTAR operate with both TF and PF
superconducting coils. KSTAR was the first project to make the economy ofperforming separate tests on each magnet. This ensemble of results led to an industrial
capacity to construct complex magnets with sizes above 10m and with fields of up to
10 T at temperatures from 1.8 to 4.5 K. Since 2005, high temperature superconductors(HTS) are commercially available (YBCO). YBCO coated conductors arranged in
twisted ribbon stacks seem to be the most promising candidate for manufacturing large
coils at high fields with this technology. It has excellent mechanical properties andcould operate at about 70K. HTS offer a prospect for simplification of the entire cryosystem leading to reduced construction and operation costs.
At the Durham European reference laboratory, D.P. Hampshire (O-17) measured theproperties of LTS and HTS samples versus strain in a broad range of magnetic fieldvalues. He gave the physics insight for the mechanisms at work either within the grain
itself of the superconducting material or at its boundary.
T. Hemni (O-17) described the method to measure directly the internal strain of Nb3Sn
cable-in-conduit by neutron diffraction. The initial tests have been successful andsystematic measurements which have been unfortunately delayed by the recent huge
earthquake are now imminent.

11

Figure 6: summary of the history of superconductivity applied to magnetic fusion (M.
Noe and P. Komarek PL-6).
9. Materials.
S. Zinkle (PL-2) reviewed the status of material required for fusion reactors. Whilst
the materials required by ITER are available, there is a large gap to be filled before
getting all those necessary for a fusion reactor. Research on structural materials which
are submitted to 14 MeV neutron irradiation produced by the fusion reactions sufferfrom the lack of an adequate neutron source such as the one foreseen in the IFMIF
programme. It is thus now forced to rely, on one hand, on an indirect experimental
approach (triple beam, weaker neutrons from fast reactors) and, on the other hand, on
thermodynamic modelling and on numerical simulations of a highly multiscale nature.
The challenges focus on moderating the effect of irradiation at around the 25 dpa level,on the temperature increase of the ductile/brittle transition and on avoiding helium
bubble formation in the material (figures 7). Three types of materials are studied(figure 8) – reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels possibly doped with nano size
oxide particles (ODS) - refractory vanadium alloys and composite SiC/SiC ceramics.
The ODS have improved strength and the potential to withstand the expected helium
production within the core of the material but its properties require to be validated; forinstance, the tritium trapping rate is not known. It is also stressed that these advanced
steels depends very sensitively on the exact composition of the steel and on its heat
treatment. However, progresses on thermodynamical calculations indicate pathways
for significant improvements with small changes on the detailed process.

12

Figure 7: Operating temperature window for materials under 14 MeV neutron
irradiation (S. Zinkle PL-2) (Reproduced from S.J. Zinkle and N.M. Ghoniem, J. Nucl.
Mater. vol. 417 (2011) pp. 2-8)50*FusionDREAM*

Conversion efficiency / %

AGR
FBR

40

PWR

HTGR
FFHR*

30

SSTR*

ARIES-1*
SiC ceramic

V alloy

BWR
RAF steelHe

20

Li, Li-Pb, Flibe
Water

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Coolant temperature / oC
Figure 8: Heat/electricity conversion efficiency versus the coolant temperatureallowed by materials (N. Yanagi I-13)

13

10. Blankets, tritium, DEMO and the reactor
The conference attracted a wealth of studies concerning DEMO, the fusion reactors
and related technologies. General characteristics of a few types of DEMOs underconsideration are listed in Table 2. A number of general observations are striking:- Several competent groups have recently been formed for focussing on
fusion power plant (FPP) R&D.
- Quite different types of fusion plants are considered. They range from very
compact steady state tokamaks to large helical systems. Pulsed tokamaks
with energy storage are also considered.
- Authors generally agree on the critical issues (K. Yamazaki O-15, S.
Zinkle PL-2) and on the major challenges to overcome. For instance, thethermal loading on divertors (R. Wolf O-16) and the choice of long lastingmaterials under neutron irradiation are quoted by all.
- The success of ITER and of long pulse operation on existing experiments
appear clearly in the critical path to the next step.
- The strategies to DEMO and beyond can greatly vary from a group toanother in particular on how to bridge the gap between ITER and FPP.
IFMIF, CTF and progressive DEMO steps are variable items underdiscussion among the various groups- There would be great benefits to enhance the collaboration among thevarious groups in order to expedite the large amount of R&D work
necessary before the construction of a fusion DEMO
G. Federici (PL-5) summarized the activities of the newly formed EFDA power plant
physics and technology department. There is a new emphasis in the EU to redirect a
predominantly physics research to a reactor relevant technology and physics
development. This includes DEMO design activities done in the frame work of theEuropean/Japan broader approach activities. Two different approaches to DEMO areconsidered: an inductive cyclic concept with modest power density (a fairly straightscale-up of ITER) and a more compact one running in steady state. A key constraint isthe divertor power load. Conventional radiating divertors and advanced super X orsnow flakes concepts are both envisaged. Putting an initial emphasis on fusion systems
design codes, he stressed that a DEMO programme would strongly benefit from afocussed material irradiation programme.
F. Najmabadi (I-12) compared pulsed, with massive thermal energy storage, and SS
tokamaks (70-150MW CD power; 60-70% of bootstrap). He finds SST superior forproviding a lower cost of electricity and stresses that plastic analysis gives larger
engineering margins for SST. A credible energy storage concept should first be
developed when considering a pulsed machine.
H. L. Kim (I-18) considers, on behalf of the NFRI DEMO team, cross-cutting ideas
for fusion DEMO plant(s) with current and generation IV nuclear power plants (NPP).

14

DEMO is envisaged in 2 steps: a K–DEMO-1 using the technologies of current NPP
with a construction starting in 2022 to validate the technical feasibility and a KDEMO-2 (construction in 2030) to demonstrate the economic feasibility. In both cases,
the selection of materials has to be done at an early stage. The power, irradiation andavailability would evolve in 2 stages of power: 60 MWe, 4 dpa and 600 MWe, 200
dpa. Many R&D facilities (High neutron flux, hydraulic test loops, T removal facilityetc.) would be shared with the NPP programme. The commonalities would greatly
expedite R&D and mitigate risks. The success of ITER and long pulse operation of
KSTAR are in the critical path.
N. Yanagi, T. Goto et al (I-13) described the design and R&D for an LHD typeheliotron DEMO with tritium sufficiency (Figure 9). For 3 GWth, the machine is large(Rplasma=14.4m, a=2.54m, Bp=5.1T, about 4xLHD) but draws great benefit for having
no CD, no disruptions and a moderate neutron wall load (1.5 MW/m2). The 1st
superconducting option is a CIC conductor with Nb3Al. The operating temperature of
the blanket is enhanced by avoiding thermal creep with ODS RAFM. The strike pointon the divertor is swept using helical divertor coils.
S. Masuzaki (I-20) addressed the particle and heat control in steady state helical
reactors. Particle control and a burning rate of 0.18% are achieved with pellets withsizes from 6.2 to 7.8mm and speeds from 1.2 to 10 km/s which appear feasible within
the present technical basis. With regards to power control, it is first noted that thedivertor trace is nearly 10 times longer than in tokamaks providing less power flux
density. However being non uniform, it is still too large so mitigating methods have to
be used such as sweeping of the magnetic axis or impurity seeding (increased radiating
fraction) or RMP to increase the radiating region.
Table 2: General characteristics of a few types of DEMOs under consideration
Demo types

Pulsed tokamak

Advanced steadystate tokamak

Typicalparameters(R, a)
9.5 m 3m
A~3
5.5 m 2.6
A ~ 4 to 6

14m 2.5m
Helical DEMO

Pros

Cons

No CCD
Moderate power
density
ITER scaled-up
No thermal cycling
Smallest machine

Energy storage to be
definedNo disruption, no
CD, moderate power
densities

Current Drive (CD)required, prone toinstabilities, highpower density anderosionLarge size andcomplexity

15

Japanese research on tritium science and technology for fusion was reviewed by T.
Tanabe (I-10). Seven facilities can handle tritium in Japan contributing to studying thetritium cycle, its behaviour in blanket modules with a minimum T breeding ratio of
1.07 and its confinement (permeation and leakage), retention and removal. A main
challenge is the large tritium through-put required by the low burning efficiently(~1%) combined with requirements for an extremely low leakage and for an accurate
accountancy.
The total decay heat in a 3GW fusion DEMO reactor using F82H steel is estimated by
Y. Someya (O-11) to be 46 MW after shutdown, 7.3MW after one week and 2.5 MW
after a month. The blankets made in F82H are the largest contributors. Tungsten is
responsible for the largest decay heat density. Using SiC/SiC would reduce a lot theblanket contribution to the decay heat.
M. Enoeda (I-11) summarized the Japanese developments for an ITER test blanket
module (TBM) and for an advanced breeder for DEMO. The programme based on
WCCB concept (water cooled ceramic breeder where breeding is achieved with
Li2TiO3 pebble bed) and using RAFM steel (F82H) leads to installation in ITER in
2020 and requires a start of construction in 2014. The impressive programme includes
the design, tests (including tritium recovery measurements) and mock-ups. Japan acts
as a port master and is the TBM leader for testing the WCCB TBM. Japan is also apartner for the tests of other concepts (HCCB/HCSB, LiPb based TBM).

Figure 9: Helical DEMO reactor (N. Yanagi et al I-13)
11. Cross cutting aspects
The conference has been a rich forum for synergies between disciplines which, at firstglance have little in common. The cross cutting aspects between fission and fusion
have been discussed earlier within this article in the reactor section and the common
material issues have also been stressed. On a different subject, K. Tanaka (I-19)

16

described the research platform on laser and ion beams and identified the potential
contributions to fusion research. For example, the laser produced plumes can besimilar to the one in divertors during ELM’s and can provide new information on thevapour shielding effect as a function of the material ablated (C, W, Li etc..) as well as
on hydrogen co deposition. The considerable stagnation of carbon plumes reveals theimportance of molecular formation in absorbing the kinetic energy within the plume.

12. Final remarks.
The 2011 international conference held in Toki will be remembered as a very
successful venue. This series of conference is a matured major conference which
attracts outstanding contributions in a broad domain. Among the numerous areas
covered by this summary, we first note that very long pulse operation, which was themain theme of this venue, is clearly a most essential element in the critical path to a
successful ITER programme and then to fusion DEMOs. SSO experiments are still in
the low GJ domain and there is a long way to achieving ITER and DEMO
requirements. The present and the new super conducting machines which are now
coming on line, address this issue as a matter of priority. They are well armed forproviding answers required not only by ITER but also by the new groups recently
constituted for designing the DEMO power plants as the next step in fusion research
after ITER. The success both in the attendance and in the quality of the contributions
to this conference demonstrates that the SSO issues are being addressed with anincreasing level of strength. Despite the good progress achieved to date and theinnovations summarised here, this level will need to be further increased in the near
future. The scientific community is well prepared to responding to the SSO challenges.
Acknowledgements:
It is a pleasure to thank all the authors quoted here for useful discussions and Prof. T.
Muroga and Dr. T. Goto for their kind help during the conference and in preparing themanuscript.

Nota Bene:
The letters and numbers in the parentheses are the IDs of the papers presented at theconference. The program and the abstracts of the papers are available at the following
site:
http://www.nifs.ac.jp/itc/itc21/ITC-21_book_of_abstracts.pdf

17