Report on Child Pornography in Japan
What needs to be done in order to protect children?
~ Where to draw the line? ~7 February 2018

(This picture does not represent any of the mentioned parties in the following report)

Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Research Methods
1. The background of legal restrictions on child pornography in Japanese domestic law
2. Child Prostitution and the Child Pornography Prohibition Act(1) The First Revision(2) The Second Revision
3. Other legal restrictions on child pornography in Japan(1) Regulations for the production and sale of child pornography(2) Juvenile protection ordinances(3) The Penal Code(4) The Child Welfare Act(5) Act on the Prevention of Child Abuse(6) Comprehensive Measures to Eliminate Child Pornography(7) Efforts and policies of the National Police Agency and the Metropolitan Police
Department(8) Developments in the private sector
Chapter 3: Human Rights Now Field Survey
1. Investigation of physical retail stores in May and August 2015
(1) Pornographic material featuring young girls(2) Pornographic material containing images of sexual abuse(3) Chakuero
2. Investigation of retail stores in March 2016
(1) Products that involve sexual intercourse with elementary school students(2) Chakuero products(3) Videos containing sexual intercourse
3. Investigation of physical retail stores in May 2016
4. Investigation of Online Material
5. Reflections from a health professional
6. Summary of the HRN Field Survey
Chapter 5: Industry Stakeholders
1. Product Producers
2. Review Associations
3. Store Owners
4. Delivery, Rental Service and Wholesale Stores(1) Delivery and rental service(2) Wholesale Stores(3) Online sales and Applications
Chapter 6: The Efforts of Relevant Institutions
1. Systemic flaws leading to ineffective control over child pornography in Japan
1

3
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
17
18
18
18
20
20
21
21
22
22
24
25
28
29
31
31
32
32
33
33
33
34
35
35

2. Interviews with the National Policy Agency and Metropolitan Police Department(1) Interview with the National Police Agency(2) Interview with the Metropolitan Police Department
3. Review Associations and the Intellectual Property Promotion Association(1) Japan Contents Review Center’s efforts(2) Visual Software Contents Industry Corporation(3) Recent Efforts of the Intellectual Property Promotion Association (IPPA)
4. Policy Developments Addressing Physical Retail Stores(1) Visit to the Self Media Network Association(2) The reason why a decision like (2) above had not been made yet(3) Alerting Stores to the Presence of Child Pornography(4) Results of the Investigation
5. Policy developments Addressing Internet-related Services(1) Internet Providers(2) Rental-server Providers(3) Search Engines(4) Online Applications
Chapter 7: International Human Rights Standards
1. International human rights laws and standards regarding child pornography(1) Related international human rights laws and standards
2. The Current Situation in Japan(1) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
3. Examples from abroad(1) The United States(2) The European Union
Chapter 8: Conclusion
1. Measures to protect children
CHAPTER 9: Recommendations
Addendum

36
36
36
38
39
40
41
42
42
42
42
43
44
44
45
46
47
48
48
48
51
52
53
53
54
56
57
60
63

7F Creative One Akihabara Bldg., 5-3-4 Ueno, Taito-ku, Tokyo 110-0005 JAPAN
Tel：+81-3-3835-2110 / Fax：+81-3-3834-1025 / info@hrn.or.jp
Human Rights Now is a Tokyo-based international human rights NGO.

Note: This report is the English translation of the original Japanese report available at:
http://hrn.or.jp/activity/8307/. This report will be shared publicly. In light of international and domestic
legal standards on children’s rights, certain images and text excerpts are not included.
2

Executive SummaryChildren are entitled to the same human rights and fundamental freedoms as all individuals. However,like other vulnerable groups, children have been afforded special status and protection in international
human rights treaties. Violations of children’s human rights are considered particularly grave. Child
pornography violates these international norms on a number of accounts.
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1 (CRC) is the most comprehensive treaty on
children’s rights. Article 34 of the Convention covers the protection of children from all forms of ‘sexual
exploitation and sexual abuse’, including the exploitative use of children in pornographic performancesand materials. 2 The Second Optional Protocol to the CRC on the sale of children, child prostitution andchild pornography 3 requires states to ensure that sexual exploitation of children is criminalized. Japan isa signatory to this optional protocol. 4
In Japanese domestic law, the ‘Act on Punishment of Activities relating to Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography and the Protection of Children’ 5 was adopted on 18 May 1999, based on the international
norms enshrined in Article 34 of the CRC. The law has been revised in 2004 and 2014. The 2004 revisionsought to incorporate the Optional Protocol to the CRC and the Council of Europe’s Convention on
Cybercrime. The 2014 revision marked 10 years since the last revision and focused on the rise of theInternet, which has led to a strong increase in the number of victims of child pornography.
Japan’s revised law on child pornography defines the term ‘child pornography’ under three items in
Article 2(3). Items (i) and (ii) define punishable products as any image involving sexual intercourse or
touching of sexual organs which stimulates sexual desire, respectively. While Items (i) and (ii) arestraightforward in intent, Item (iii) has provoked disputes. Item (iii) defines child pornography as “anyimage of a child wholly or partially naked, in which sexual body parts of the child (genital organs or theparts around them, buttocks or chest) are exhibited or emphasized and arouses or stimulates sexualdesire” 6 The core intent of Item (iii) is to ensure that even a product not involving sexual contact (orvirtual sexual contact) could still be punishable as child pornography.
From May 2015 Human Rights Now (“HRN”), a Tokyo-based international human rights NGO,
investigated whether the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Act effectively regulated andcriminalized child pornography. The implementation of the Act is restricted to cases where photographic
1

UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p. 3,
available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html
2
Article 34, UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol.
1577, p. 3, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html
3
UN General Assembly, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed
Conflict, 25 May 2000, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/47fdfb180.html
4
Japan signed the Optional Protocol to the CRC on 10 May 2002 and ratified the Optional Protocol on 24 Jan 2005.
5“Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children”, Act
No. 52, 26 May 1999, , translation available at: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/APARCP.pdf.
6“Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children”, Act No.
52, 26 May 1999, , translation available at: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/APARCP.pdf.

3

or video material of children is involved. Therefore, the Act does not cover (manga) drawings of minors.
The scope of this report is thus limited to materials in which human actors are involved. Based on thisone-year investigation, HRN publishes this report in both English and Japanese.
Based on this one-year investigation covering both online material and visits to physical retail stores inTokyo’s Akihabara district, HRN can confirm that material suspected of being child pornography is widely
sold in Japan. This includes:●●●

Many DVDs openly advertised as if they contained child pornography;
DVDs containing pornographic material which advertise their performers to be younger thaneighteen;
DVDs containing pornographic material where the physical appearance of performers seems tosuggest that they are younger than eighteen.

These DVDs are widely circulated as commercial products, and they are openly displayed and sold in
retail stores, as well as available through online channels.
Even though the investigation was limited in scope, it clearly revealed that material suspected ofcontaining or advertising as if they were containing child pornography were widely available. Several
factors contribute to this situation:
1) Police do not regulate child pornography when it cannot easily be determined that minors are
involved due to the unknown age of performers (e.g., when the ages of performers are notprinted on the cover of the material);
2) Monitoring systems for reviewing material, distribution, and sales which are meant to detect
underage performers do not function properly;3) A substantial monitoring system for pornographic material falling under Art. 2.3(iii) is lacking.
According to the Metropolitan police, the following issues prevent effective regulation:
●
●

●
●

Victims rarely report to the police. This makes it more difficult to identify victims andperpetrators of child pornography and to find and verify the ages of performers;
Priority is given to regulating instances under 2.3 (i) and 2.3 (ii). The regulation of serious childpornography has a first priority, so the regulation of material falling under Art. 2.3(iii), which isbroadly sold commercially, is not thorough;The available human resources of police are insufficient to police child pornography. The
majority of human resources focuses on online screening;
Police have a bias in assuming that products openly and publically sold in shops or through theInternet cannot, for that reason, be child pornography under the Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography Prohibition Act.

However, the videos that the HRN investigation team found in the shops were suspected to include allcategories mentioned under Article 2(3) of the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Act. In addition,4

many products that did not pass the review process of review associations were still on sale in major
adult video stores and websites, such as DMM.
Especially problematic are videos or images branded chakuero (“clothed ero”, i.e., images where theperformer is wearing clothes). These videos do not include explicit sexual contact or sexual intercourse
and are therefore regarded as non-adult products. Because of this, many chakuero manufacturers do
not belong to the Specified Nonprofit Corporation Intellectual Property Promotion Association (IPPA)
and are therefore exempt from review. In addition, even if some products pass the screening of a review
association, they may promote their performers as elementary school students and are hence strongly
suspected to be child pornography, despite having passed the review. Since chakuero is widely sold inJapanese stores, there seems to be a lack of clarity as to its legal position.
According to an interview with one of the review associations, the review process was upgraded in 2015,
and products that allude to containing child pornography no longer pass the review. However, theimproved review standard has not been made public, and HRN could not confirm whether the process
has indeed improved. In addition, products that have already passed the pre-2015 review have not beenrecalled and continue to be sold widely. Furthermore, the review associations are biased towards
manufacturers, and they do not have a mechanism to confirm the age of performers when they suspectchild pornography. Therefore, the review system proves to be insufficient.
In retail stores, products that have not passed a review are widely sold. A system to confirm performers’
name and age by official documents when the store suspects a product as child pornography has also
not been introduced. From the fact that products that fall within the item 2.3(iii) category are publicly
sold in stores, it seems that the stores do not fully understand the regulation of this category andbelieve that a genre such as chakuero is allowed by law.
As a result, the following types of products are frequently encountered on the Japanese market:
1) Products that are suspected to be child pornography without passing a review (including chakuero);2) Products that have passed a review before the revision of the review process in 2015;3) Products that have passed the new review but are suspected to be child pornography because thereview associations failed to check the age of the performers.
In addition, these products are sold online. Online shopping websites widely offer material suspected ofcontaining child pornography. However, the Internet Contents Safety Association (ICSA) has started
blocking child pornography. Internet providers and rental servers of adult video websites prohibit illegal
contents according to the governing law. In addition, search engines like Google take steps to preventchild pornography from appearing in their search results. Unfortunately, in spite of these efforts,
material suspected of being child pornography is widely available online and easily found through searchengines.
The following factors contribute to this situation:
1) Relevant manufacturers do not have monitoring systems for the age of performers;
52) Materials falling under Article 2.3(iii), such as chakuero and image videos, are generally not fullyrecognized as prohibited.
Based on these facts, HRN has attempted to improve the current situation by raising awareness andmeeting with relevant institutions and manufacturers. Following these actions, the following changes
have occurred:●●●●

The Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) detected an unscreened chakuero case in June 2016
and subsequently issued warnings to review association and stores in July 2016;
The Intellectual Property Promotion Association (IPPA), an adult-video industry group, requested
dealers who handle adult videos to ban unscreened products.
Sell Media Network Association, another adult video retail stores association, has banned
unscreened products following the MPD’s warning and has declared that it will prevent recurrences.
Following HRN’s suggestion, the review associations have started to consider tightening their review
standards for child pornography. Furthermore they are considering discarding products.

HRN welcomes these positive steps made by relevant institutions and manufacturers and hopes these
efforts will be continued. HRN will continue to work together with these partners to eradicate childpornography in Japan.
Unfortunately, the scope of this report does not extend to situations where children become involved insexual exploitation through child pornography. However, there seem to be professional services whichconnect children, especially young girls, to chakuero manufacturers. Productions that include children
under the age of 18 do not comply with the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act, as
well as the Child Welfare Act and the Labor law (under Article 56, which addresses the employment ofminors and criminalizes sexual exploitation of children). Effective monitoring systems to protect
children’s rights are essential, and the implementation of current legal standards should be improved.
To improve the current situation and eradicate child pornography in Japan, HRN developed researchbased recommendations to relevant sectors of the Japanese government, MPD, and relevant
manufacturers. HRN also suggested future legal revisions in light of the changing international standards
and foreign practice regarding child pornography. Next to this, eradicating child pornography requires asocietal change. A large part of this should be communicating accurate knowledge about the Child
Pornography Act, since many Japanese believe chakuero (and other materials falling under Article
2.3(iii)) is not considered child pornography. HRN strongly demands a zero-tolerance policy to beenacted and asks the relevant institutions to communicate clear guidelines on which materials amountto child pornography.

6

Recommendations:
1. To the Government of Japan (the Cabinet Office and relevant cabinet ministers):● Investigate (a) the reality of production, sales, circulation, and delivery of child pornography, (b) the
background of children who get involved in child pornography, and (c) relevant industries andharmful practices, and take necessary steps to prevent such production, circulation, and harm.
● Consider effective supervision methods and legal regulations so that the production agencies that
employ children under the age of eighteen actively work to protect children and employees.
● Actively communicate that pornographic material falling under Article 2.3(iii) amounts to childpornography and make its eradication an important mission to all government ministries,
municipalities, public institutions, relevant industries and the community at large
2. To the Metropolitan Police Department:● Designate the elimination of child pornography as a priority; allocate necessary financial resources
and manpower to it; and establish a zero-tolerance policy for child pornography.
● Confirm the age of performers through supply chains and actively follow up on cases where the ageof the performers is not confirmed.
● Inform all police stations that pornographic material falling under article 2.3(iii) amounts to childpornography. Furthermore, members of the police force should see this issue as a priority androutinely conduct searches and follow up activities at retail stores in their neighborhoods.
● Strengthen its search capability, develop and educate human resources, ensure necessary
manpower at each police station, and strengthen existing regulations.
3. To government institutions and lawmakers, consider the following proposals:● Obligate all parties who manufacture, edit, circulate, screen, sell, or deliver pornography to holdrecords to confirm the age of all performers and prosecute parties who fail to comply.
● Obligate providers to inform the police of pornographic material featuring children if they encounterany.
4 .To Industry Stakeholders:● Adopt a zero-tolerance policy for child pornography despite the public opinion of genres likechakuero.
● Adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the production, circulation, sale, delivery, and rental service ofpornographic material featuring children, including but not limited to material falling under Art.
2.3(iii).
● Check performers’ name, identity and age by official documents (ID) in all stages of the
production process, including but not limited to production, review, circulation, delivery, sale,and rental of the material.
● Announce a uniform and tightened review standard applicable to all products in line withcurrent and applicable legal standards.
● Confirm performers’ age in the review phase by using official documents.

7

●
●
●
●
●

Strictly prohibit child pornography including but not limited to pornographic materials fallingunder Art. 2.3(iii).
Introduce self-regulation measures for products which allude to being child pornography.
Collect and discard products which fail to pass the new standards in reviews.
No longer sell, circulate, sell online, or deliver products that fail to pass a review.
Establish and carry out guidelines which prohibit retail and online stores which feature childpornography or products suspected as child pornography from handling such products.

5. To review associations:● Do not pass any pornography featuring a performer under the age of eighteen, regardless ofwhether it is chakuero, and inform the public of this practice.
● Establish clear and unified review standards and processes as review associations to eliminate
child pornography, achieve accountability by publishing them to the society, and establish asystem where all products should be reviewed.
● In order to comply with the Child Pornography Act, the standards and processes for review must
include the following matters.
● Implement an age review in the review process and do not pass a product under the review
unless the review association confirms that performers are 18 years old or older by IDs and age
confirmation materials. Fail a product under review if there is no ID to prove a performer’s age isover eighteen years of age.
● Do not pass any products which are suspected as falling under Art. 2.3(iii) under the review.
● Clarify the review standards for products which are suspected as child pornography and do notpass the following products under the review:o Any products where a child has sexual intercourse with an adult, or a child is sexuallyassaulted, sexually abused, or sexually harassed regardless of the age of the performer;
o Any products that are suspected as child pornography, regardless of the age of theperformer;
o Any products advertising or stating that a performer is an elementary school student or
junior high school student or is under the age of 18;
o Any products advertised as “child pornography” or chakuero;o Any products suggestive of child pornography from the costumes or accessories in the video
to personal belongings or the setting, etc.
● Re-screen all of the products previously passed under former review standards in order toensure that products violating new standards are not distributed, sold, or delivered.
Immediately stop selling, distributing, lending, or collecting and discard those products that do
not pass the new review; and make sure everyone is informed of this practice.
6. To retailers, wholesalers, and rental shops:● Confirm a policy not to sell, distribute, lend, or handle child pornography including material
categorized under Art. 2.3(iii);● Check in advance and keep copies of the public documents showing the name and age ofthe performers of all products in which a child under the age of 18 may perform.
8●Do not sell at stores, do not lend, and do not distribute through wholesalers the products
which have not been passed under strict review.

7. To Pornographic Websites:● Adopt a strict policy on child pornography and actively check the ages of performers, including
materials falling under Art. 2.3 (iii).
● Take all necessary steps to prevent users from watching child pornography, including but notlimited to blocking and deletion of user accounts and streaming websites.

9

Chapter 1: Introduction
The production, sale, distribution, commercialization, and possession of child pornography are serious
violations of children’s rights. The rise of the Internet has led to a sharp increase in the production andspreading of pornographic material featuring children. In Japan, both online and offline childpornography is prevalent and products explicitly advertised or highly suspected of being childpornography are widely sold and circulated. However, both international and domestic legal standards
criminalize the production, sale, and possession of child pornography in Japan.
As a response to the prevalence of child pornography and mounting international criticism, Japan
passed the “Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and
the Protection of Children” in 1999 in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of
the Child (CRC). The original law was revised in 2014 and sought to extend the scope of the law to online
child pornography. The Japanese government has strengthened its regulations against childpornography due to criticism from the international community, and the number of arrests and victimsof child pornography reached a record-high in 2014. In spite of these efforts, there is a serious gap
between legal regulations and reality on the ground, considering the prevalence of material suspectedof being child pornography in retail stores in Japan, as well as in online environments.
Starting in May 2015, Human Rights Now (HRN), a Japan-based international human rights NGO,
conducted a one-year research project on child pornography. HRN staff members reviewed both
websites and retail stores in Tokyo’s Akihabara district and scheduled interviews with institutions
involved in the identification and prosecution of child pornography, such as the Metropolitan Police
Department (MPD).
This report will outline the methodology used by the research team and introduce the applicable legal
framework in Japan. Subsequently, the results of the field research and interviews with members ofindustry stakeholders will be introduced. The final part of the report will touch upon the international
legal framework regarding child pornography and will suggest a number of recommendations torelevant stakeholders in order to effectively criminalize and eradicate child pornography in Japan.

10Chapter 2: Research Methods
The one-year investigation by the HRN team started in May 2015. In order to adequately gather
information on the prevalence of child pornography in Japan, the team employed a number of researchmethods.
The HRN team visited both retail stores in Tokyo and online stores where material suspected of being
child pornography is sold. Both retail stores and online stores were visited several times during the
research project. The team selected and investigated stores around Akihabara, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo. It
was difficult to contact victims of child pornography. Therefore, we limited the scope of thisinvestigation to the distribution of suspected child pornography.
Secondly, the HRN team contacted relevant institutions and investigated their policies and actions.
These institutions include the MPD, review associations, sales groups, and adult video (hereinafter “AV”)
producers. Subsequently, the impacts of their increased efforts were analyzed. Due to the wide range ofactors, HRN realizes that knowledge acquired through these interviews does not paint a comprehensive
picture of the situation. However, it was decided to include the results of the interviews in this report inorder to share information on the current situation of child pornography in Japanese society.
Thirdly, the HRN team interviewed an experienced pediatrician. We showed her material that did not
specify the age of performers, and her expertise served to identify cases of suspected childpornography. Although the definition of child pornography sometimes includes pornographic material
advertised as child pornography in which performers are nevertheless over the age of 18, the definition
used in the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act was employed.
1. The background of legal restrictions on child pornography in Japanese domestic law
Japan did not have any regulations on child pornography before passing the Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography Prohibition Act in 1999. It is said that child pornography freely circulated before that time.
(The situation was labelled by some as “child pornography heaven”.) Recently, emerging technologies
such as smartphones, cameras, and computers have enabled users to record and save child pornography
easily. This has led to a worldwide increase in the sale and distribution of Japanese child pornography.
A number of studies show that child pornography of Japanese origin is widely circulated. For example,
according to a survey by University College Cork (Ireland) in 1997, most of the pornographic materialfeaturing underage girls circulating online was from Japan. This accounts for 73% of the total content,
followed by the USA (14%), and the UK (3%).7 During the first World Conference against the Commercial
Sexual Exploitation of Children held in 1996, facts emerged that sex tourism by Japanese men in
Southeast Asia is wide-spread and Japan had become an international source of child pornography. Theinternational community voiced criticism on the lack of domestic Japanese legal regulation to address
this situation at that point in time.
7

Taylor, M. (1998) "Paedophilia and the Internet", Proceedings of the First COPINE Conference. University College Cork.

11

This resulted in the adoption of the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act in 1999. 8
The bill of the Act was submitted to the House of Councilors in 1999 by seven cross-party lawmakers
including Mr. Yoshimasa Hayashi, a member of the House of Councilors. It was passed by both theHouse of Representatives and the House of Councilors and issued on 26 May 1999. Ms. Mayumi
Moriyama, a member of the House of Representatives, stated that it was decided to include only theminimum possible requirements on which it was easy to reach agreement for the sake of expediency inpassing the Act. Because of this, the criminal provisions on reporting victims’ names and possession of
pornographic materials featuring children was only included in the Act when it was amended three years
later.
Article 6 of a supplemental provision of the bill of the Act stated the following:
Regulations of child prostitution and child pornography and other systems to protect children
from sexual exploitation and sexual abuse shall be reconsidered in light of the enforcement
status of the Act and international movements regarding protection of children’s rights after
three years from the effective date of the Act. Based on the result of the reconsideration,necessary measures shall be taken.
To assess the harm inflicted by victims of child pornography, the first investigation was carried out in
February and March 2016 toward all child welfare officers throughout Japan, titled “The research andcase-study panel regarding methods taken to victims of child prostitution and child pornography at childguidance centers.” The result of the investigation was published as a report.
2. Child Prostitution and the Child Pornography Prohibition Act
The Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act defines the term “Child Pornography”
under three items in Article 2(3). Items (i) and (ii) define punishable products as any image involving
sexual intercourse or touching of sexual organs which stimulates sexual desire, respectively. While Items(i) and (ii) are straightforward in intent, Item (iii) has provoked disputes. Item (iii) defines childpornography as “any image of a child wholly or partially naked, in which sexual body parts of the child(genital organs or the parts around them, buttocks, or chest) are exhibited or emphasized and arouses
or stimulates sexual desire.” Therefore the intention of Item (iii) is to ensure that even a product not
involving sexual contact (or virtual sexual contact) could still be punishable as child pornography.
(1) The First Revision
However, after the Act took effect, child prostitution and child pornography cases still increased. A
proposal for revision was therefore submitted on 1 June 2004, passed both Houses in the 159th sessionof the Diet, and was issued on 18 June 2004. International developments on legal standards regarding
8“Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children”, Act No.
52, 26 May 1999, , translation available at: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/APARCP.pdf.

12child pornography had also developed, most notably the United Nation’s “Optional Protocol to theConvention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography” 9and the Council of Europe’s “Convention on Cybercrime”. 10 These advanced standards were included in
the revision of the Act. Next to this, the statutory penalty was tightened to punish child prostitution andchild pornography more strictly, and the range of punishment was broadened.
(2) The Second Revision
In 2014, the chairman of the Committee on Judicial Affairs submitted the proposal for revision of the Act
in the 186th session of the Diet. 11 The revision was then issued on 25 June 2014. It was based on theconsideration that ten years had passed since the first revision of the Act, and the number of children
who became victims of child pornography had increased due to the rise of the Internet. In addition,
continuous domestic debate and pressure from the international community to criminalize possessionof child pornography played a role. Firstly, the 2014 revision prohibits people from possessing childpornography without good reason by the new Article 3(2), and the possession of child pornography forthe purpose of satisfying one's sexual curiosity is also punishable by Article 7(1). Secondly, the 2014
revision added a provision to criminalize the production of child pornography by secret filming. Thirdly,
the revision changed the definition of child pornography under Art. 2.3(iii) to “Any image of a childwholly or partially naked, in which sexual body parts of the child (genital organs or the parts aroundthem, buttocks or chest) are exhibited or emphasized and arouses or stimulates sexual desire.” Finally,
the revision includes online actions by business operators regarding “assisted public display” of childpornography. In 2015, pursuant to the revised Act, an operator of digital applications was arrested forthe first time for posting child pornography.
In 2014, regulation of illustrated depictions like comics, anime, and CG which depict children in a sexual
manner was discussed but postponed. On this point, the international community considers Japan’s
efforts insufficient. A number of international institutions, such as UNICEF Japan, have publishedstatements stressing that depictions of children’s sexual exploitation should be included in the definitionof child pornography. 12
3. Other legal restrictions on child pornography in Japan
Next to the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act, there are a number of other legal
regulations that cover this issue.

9

UN General Assembly, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed
Conflict, 25 May 2000, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/47fdfb180.html
10Council of Europe, Convention on Cybercrime, 23 November 2001, available at:
http://www.refworld.org/docid/47fdfb202.html
11
A translation of the revision is available at: http://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/japan-possession-of-childpornography-finally-punishable/.
12
OHCHR, ‘UN Human Rights Expert urges Japan to step up Efforts to Combat Child Sexual Exploitation’, 28 Oct. 2015, available
at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=16669&; Reuters, ‘UNICEF says Japan failing tocontrol Child Porn’, 11 Mar. 2008, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-pornography/unicef-says-japanfailing-to-control-child-porn-idUST20430220080311

13(1) Regulations for the production and sale of child pornography
Article 175 of the Penal Code prohibits the “distribution, display in public, or possession of an obscene
document, drawing, or other object.” 13 According to legal precedent, ‘indecency’ is defined as what
“unnecessarily excites or stimulates sexual desire, contravenes the normal sense of embarrassment
commonly present in a normal ordinary person, and runs counter to a good moral concept pertaining tosexual matters.” In practice, judges seem to weigh the presence or absence of exposure of private parts
heavily.
(2) Juvenile protection ordinances
In Japan, each municipality has its own juvenile protection ordinances. These ordinances often haveindividual regulations of child pornography. For example, the Osaka Prefecture Juvenile Protection
Ordinance declared that the following actions are sexual abuse of juveniles:●

To make a juvenile whose age is under 13 hold a pose that emphasizes the pubic region andbuttocks wearing swimwear or underwear.
● To make a juvenile whose age is between 13 and 18, without consent or by using duress, fraud,or confusion, hold a pose that emphasizes the pubic region and buttocks wearing swimwear orunderwear.
The ordinance required business operators and parents or guardians not to produce or sell records ofchildren’s sexual abuse and furthermore prohibited possession of such records. Regulations against
violations of children’s human rights during the production process of child pornography are included.
(3) The Penal Code
Article 182 of the Penal Code covering Inducement to Promiscuous Intercourse, states “A person who,
for the purpose of profit, induces a female without a promiscuous habit to engage in sexual intercourse,
shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine of not more than
300,000 yen.”(4) The Child Welfare Act
The Child Welfare Act prohibits actions which “cause a child to commit an obscene act” and “keep achild under one's control, with the intent of causing the child to commit an act making an impact that ismentally and physically harmful to the child.” A breach of these prohibitions is punishable by apunishment which includes a prison term. 14

13

Penal Code, Act No.45 of 1907, translation available at: http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/PC.pdf.
“Child Welfare Act”, Act No. 164, 12 Dec. 1947, translation available at:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=11&vm=2

14

14

(5) Act on the Prevention of Child Abuse
This act clarifies that to “engage in indecency against a child or cause a child to engage in indecency” isincluded in the definition of child abuse, and it prohibits such actions. The act does not specify a possible
sentence. 15
The Japanese government, especially the police force, has undertaken action on several levels: they
have (1) conducted a series of steps including development of a “domestic action plan against children’scommercial sexual exploitation” in 2001; (2) enacted the Act on Regulation on Soliciting Children by
Using Opposite Sex Introducing Service on Internet in 2003; (3) published a decision on theComprehensive Measure to Eliminate Child Pornography in 2010; and (4) published Japan’s 2014 Action
Plan to Combat Trafficking in Persons.
(6) Comprehensive Measures to Eliminate Child Pornography
In July 2010, the cabinet ministers responsible for anti-crime measures established the Comprehensive
Measures to Eliminate Child Pornography to stop the persistent spread of child pornography in Japan.
These measures were based on current legal standards and contain a number of steps that government
agencies need to perform in cooperation with business operators and other relevant actors in society.
However, notwithstanding these efforts, the number of child pornography cases continued to increase.
As a result, the Second Comprehensive Measures to Eliminate Child Pornography was established in
May 2013. This measure strengthened regulations on circulation and online browsing of pornographic
materials featuring children, including countermeasures against file sharing software. In addition,
protections for victim assistance were strengthened, as were efforts to boost international cooperation.
Furthermore, the cabinet ministers responsible for anti-crime measures established the Third
Comprehensive Measure to Eliminate Child Pornography in July 2016. According to these measures, thegovernment should take a number of steps such as crackdowns, prevention of circulation and browsing,and assistance of child victims. The measures especially worked to strengthen crackdowns on younger
child pornography fan groups, child pornography sales groups, and malicious child pornography cases
including overseas crimes. 16(7) Efforts and policies of the National Police Agency and the Metropolitan Police Department
Both the National Police Agency and the Metropolitan Police Department have created websites to ask
people to provide information on child pornography.

15“Act on the Prevention, etc. of Child Abuse”, Act No. 82, 24 May 2000, translation available at
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2221&vm=04&re=02.
16
Based on these Comprehensive Measures, the Cabinet Office, the National Police Agency, the Ministry of Health, Labor andWelfare, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry are carrying out steps to eliminate child pornography.

151) The National Police Agency
The National Police Agency created a special website 17 which provides that child pornography isprohibited. Additionally, the website informs the public on developments regarding the First, Second,
and Third Comprehensive Measures to Eliminate Child Pornography.
On 12 June 2015, the Child Pornography Eradication Working Team summarized their progress (fromMay 2014 to April 2015) as follows:
1. Strengthened a national movement to eliminate child pornography through the Council
for the Promotion of Measures against Child Pornography. Furthermore, organized apublic symposium “Consideration of child pornography cases: prevention in advance,
prevention of expansion, and protection and support of children victims”. Lastly,organized information activities, such as the production and distribution of posters andleaflets.
2. Set up measures to prevent new victims of child pornography. These include
educational activities like delinquency prevention classes, the Net Moral Caravan group,and Internet-safety classes.
3. Prevention of the circulation and browsing of pornographic images featuring children on
the Internet. This includes strengthening the crackdown on malicious child pornographycases and promoting prompt deletion to website managers. In addition, publicawareness activities were organized on specific blocking measures.
4. Support activities for vulnerable children at risk of becoming involved in childpornography.
5. Strengthening crackdowns on child pornography cases fueled by the actions of childpornography fan groups through an active application of the Child Prostitution and Child
Pornography Prohibition Act.
6. Establishing systems of cooperation with other countries regarding the issue of childpornography and strengthening international cooperation.
2) The Metropolitan Police Department
On the Metropolitan Police Department’s website, the Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child
Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children is published. The website explainsthat the following actions are under regulation: (1) production of and sharing child pornography, (2)public display of child pornography, (3) possession of child pornography for the purpose of sharing itwith others, (4) possession of child pornography for the purpose of satisfying one's sexual curiosity, and(5) production of child pornography by secret filming.
To improve the situation, the Metropolitan Police Department established the “Stop Child Pornography!
Information Hotline” which receives information on child pornography cases, such as knowledge about aperson who produces, uploads, or sells pornographic materials featuring children. The hotline also
17

The website is available at https://www.npa.go.jp/safetylife/syonen/no_cp/.

16

provides counseling for victims through phone and emails on a confidential basis. In addition, theMetropolitan Police Department frequently publishes articles on child pornography in its regular
newsletter (“Koho Keishicho”). 18(8) Developments in the private sector
In the Japanese private sector, the prohibition on browsing child pornography on the Internet (blocking)is widely known. The Internet Contents Safety Association (ICSA), a group established in March 2011,
took the initiative and 90 companies, including Google Inc., Yahoo Japan Corporation, and NTT
Communications, have joined as of 1 April 2015.
The process of blocking malicious content is as follows: the ICSA receives information from police andthe Internet Hotline Center (IHC), and it seeks to confirm whether the material amounts to childpornography. It does so by seeking the advice of experts, mostly doctors and lawyers. When childpornography is detected, an address list is provided to business operators. Subsequently, Internet
Service Providers (ISP), search engine service operators, and filtering operators block the material.
From May 2014 to April 2015, the ICSA provided address lists to websites containing child pornography
to 54 ISP companies, three search engine service operators, and three filtering operators.
Chapter 4 Field survey – Child pornography and suspicious DVDs are broadly sold and delivered

18

Koho Keishicho are available at: http://www.keishicho.metro.tokyo.jp/about_mpd/joho/koho/koho.html.

17Chapter 3: Human Rights Now Field Survey
As previously mentioned, even though regulations against child pornography are getting stricter every
year, HRN’s investigation confirms that material suspected of being child pornography and DVDs
alluding to containing child pornographic content are widely sold and distributed in Japan.
1. Investigation of physical retail stores in May and August 2015
At the end of May 2015, the HRN investigation team conducted a field survey of child pornography in
the Akihabara area in Tokyo. In August 2015, the team conducted a similar survey to compare samples.
Although the products mentioned below were strongly suspected of being child pornography, thisshould be determined in a criminal procedure. Therefore, the products encountered during the field
mission are labeled as products suspected of containing child pornography. The results of these field
missions are presented below.

A street corner where pornographic materials featuring children were displayed.
(1) Pornographic products featuring young girls(a) “Thirteen elementary sch■l students – Show all special!!” 19
The package of this product was clearly and blatantly indicating that some of the performers wereelementary school children. Its package featured the following statements: “real elementary school
students”, “Super Lolita complex!” and “Child porno!!”.
19

On the packaging, the term equivalent to “sch■l” is a Japanese character which has been partially covered so only the edges
are showing. The edges identify the character unambiguously to viewers as the word for “school” as no other character will fit.

18

From the information and screen images on the packaging of the DVD, it appeared that a child-actor was
involved in sexual intercourse. If the contents of the DVD are the same as depicted on its packaging, it
would be categorized as Art. 2.3(i) under Japan’s revised pornography law.
In addition, the fact that the performer was advertised to be an elementary school student means that
she would be under the age of thirteen. In this case, if the DVD would show what it advertises to show,
this would amount to rape under Article 177 of the Penal Code. In case other obscene acts wereconducted, this would fall into forcible indecency under Article 176 of the Penal Code.

DELETED PICTURE

Although the team was not able to confirm the girl’s name and age, it was concluded that the productwas highly suspected to be child pornography based on the information on the package, containing thefollowing phrases: “real elementary school students,” “Super Lolita complex!” and “Child porno!!”.
However, according to Lighthouse, an NGO focused on combating sex trafficking, the police often fail tofollow up on leads relating to these materials since they face difficulties confirming the age ofperformers.
(b) “Sixth grade, Real Lolita video, Backside”
Although the girl’s name and age were not confirmed in this product, based on the information on its
packaging, it was highly suspected to be child pornography that contained sexual intercourse with asixth grade student like (a) above. The packaging of this product displayed the following slogans: “Realpleasure, real throbbing, and real elementary school students” and “Endangered Lolita video”. It was
thus clearly and blatantly advertised as child pornography. Based on the performers’ body shape andthe packaging display, the material was strongly suspected to be child pornography.

DELETED PICTURE

19

(2) Pornographic material containing images of sexual abuse
The team confirmed that a series of titles were sold named “■■■■■■, a girl with bloomers” with
“Lolita” written in clear language.
(c) Series “■■■■■■, a girl with bloomers”

DELETED PICTURE

In this series, videos in which a girl wearing a school uniform was raped by several males or molested
and abused like a slave were sold. Although the girls’ names and ages were not confirmed, the package
advertises “A slave girl in uniform”. It was therefore suspected to be child pornography. Although thematerial might be staged, it seemed that the performers’ dignity had been seriously damaged as a resultof the violations and duress made in the course of the production. Furthermore, it is incredibly
worrisome that these videos may encourage abuse of women and girls in real life.
(d) “Gang Rape”(e) “A slave girl in uniform”

DELETED PICTURE(3) Chakuero
In addition to the above, chakuero or image videos of junior high or high school students were sold inlarge amounts. Chakuero implies material in which girls wear underwear or swimwear—it isdistinguished from semi-nude or nude material because models wear a kind of clothing—but they poseobscenely and are filmed while emphasizing their private parts. Although adult women sometimes
appear in chakuero, the products often identify their performers as JK or JC. (JK refers to a female highschool student, and JC means a female junior high school student.) In the retail store survey HRN
20

conducted in May 2015, the team found many chakuero videos that clearly stated the performer’s age
and advertised itself with phrases like “Real JC”.
The following items describe a number of examples of chakuero:(f) The new image video of “■■■■”In the pictures on this package, a child wearing underwear was filmed emphasizing her buttocks andbust. The pictures were meant to excite and stimulate sexual desire. If the product’s performer is a realjunior high school student as its package advertises, this is clearly child pornography. The pornographic
video of the same girl was also available on the Internet, and its caption specified that the girl was under
18 during the recording process: “this product was filmed when ■■■■ was fourteen years old and onsale in ■■, 2015”

DELETED PICTURE

DVDs suspected to be child pornography introduced in this report are part of the investigation results,
and they are by no means exceptions to the general content of the material on offer in retail stores in
Akihabara. HRN shared the information regarding (a) and (b) above that were especially suspected as
child pornography with the Metropolitan Police Department in December 2015.
2. Investigation of retail stores in March 2016
After providing information to the Metropolitan Police Department, the HRN investigation teamconducted a survey in Akihabara in March 2016 to confirm whether DVDs suspected as childpornography were still sold in the same stores. As a result, although the products that the teamreported to the Metropolitan Police Department (mentioned as (a) and (b) in 1 above) were not found,the team found similar DVDs that were strongly suspected to be child pornography.
(1) Products that involve sexual intercourse with elementary school students(g) “■■ who is 139 centimeters tall is an elementary sch■l student”
On the back of the package for this product, it said “■th grade class 3 No. 5 ■■,” and that the contents
involved a teacher’s obscene act against an elementary school student.
Producer: I.B. Works limited.

21

The package also stated “adults only,” and an approval seal of the review association VSIC’s was
included. On the back of the package, there was a description that performers under 18 did not appear
in the product.

DELETED PICTURE(2) Chakuero products(h) “Grade 1 Class 3 No.2 ■■■■” (the title is concealed for public sharing purposes)
Producer: Zeus
DELETED PICTURE

There was no review association’s seal and no description that performers under 18 did not appear in
the video on the package for this product.
(3) Videos containing sexual intercourse(i) “Carrying off homebound elementary sch■l students and gang raping them”.
On the back of this product, there was the following shocking description: “a serious rape thatdevastates an immature child”.
Producer: MANIAC

22

DELETED PICTURE

This product has nine chapters, and each chapter contains scenes where girls who acted as elementary
school students or junior high school students were carried off and violently raped. There was no review
association’s seal and no description that performers under 18 did not appear in the video. The
producer’s name which appeared on the package was Maniac. Maniac is known as a label for Crystal
Movies, an AV producer; however, the team failed to confirm Maniac as the producer. However, thesame product is also sold on the DMM AV shopping website under the name “Mania 9”.
(j) “Although it was job, I really hated it being filmed”
In the back of this package, there were descriptions such as “real sex scenes” and “A Loli■ is terrified by
the intense situation”, as well as pictures showing half-naked girls on the front and back of the product.

DELETED PICTURE

There were two DVDs in this package, one titled “Although it was job, I really hated it being filmed”, andthe other was “Female high school student ■■■ is gang jacked”, which was described as “sixteen
students and four hours, covered with sweat, tears, and semen. 240 minutes.”

DELETED PICTURE

23

The picture was deleted for public sharing purposes. The package included a statement that it passed
JMRC review and “No.080805” written on it.
3. Investigation of physical retail stores in May 2016
On 27 May 2016, the HRN investigation team went to AV retail shops in Akihabara again and foundmany chakuero videos that were categorized as “Junior Idol”.
(k) Video displaying a Junior Idol(l) Video of a girl in swimwear

DELETED PICTURE

Among them, the following two products emphasized the performers’ sexual organs, and theperformers’ age was written.
(m) “Fourteen years old, ■■■ at night”
A beautiful real junior high school girl. (The title was omitted for public sharing purposes.)24

DELETED PICTURE

A half-naked girl’s figure was on the cover of this product, and a picture displaying a half-naked or naked
girl tightened with ropes was on its backside.
(n) “JC smile”
DELETED PICTURE

The title of this product is “JC smile,” and on its back is “Smash hit after debut!! The pure, beautiful JC2girl is rapidly becoming popular”. The full name of the performer was also found on the back of the
product. JC2 refers to female junior high school students in second grade. A girl performer appeared inswimwear on the front and back of the cover, and the pictures focused on her buttocks and private
parts covered by clothes. On the back, as part of the model’s profile, her name was written, and herbirth date was written as 2000. Thus, the packaging advertised her to be under eighteen years of age.
Both of the above products had contents that could be classified as material falling under Art. 2.3(iii) of
the Child Pornography Act. As mentioned above, chakuero products such as these were widely on offer
in Akihabara’s retail stores.
4. Investigation of Online Material
When one enters the search terms “Loli” or “girl” in an online search engine, a wide array of material isfound. The HRN team strongly suspects that these search results include material by performers
younger than eighteen. However, this could not be confirmed within the scope of this research. Whenone searches “■■■ IV” or “■■■■neru” 20 online, a large number of videos that film girls’ private parts arefound. In addition, if one browses the websites of chakuero producers, many similar videos can befound, even though these are easily categorized under Art. 2.3(iii).
20

These titles are concealed for sharing purposes.

25DMM, a major delivery company, is delivering the products (c), (e), (g), (h) and (i) above. This should bestrongly condemned and followed-up by the MPD since these products are highly suspected to be childpornography based on the information on their covers.
In addition, on the Internet, some business operators argue that if viewers watch child pornography
through streaming instead of downloading, this will not be punishable as a breach of the Child
Prostitution Act. For example, the website named “■■■■” (the title was concealed for public sharing
purposes) delivered 208 titles by itself under the category “Stimulating Junior Idols” (as of June 22,2016). Many products suspected as child pornography were available on the website through streaming.

This screenshot of the website assures viewers they would not be arrested for violating the Child
Pornography Act (dated August 11, 2016).

26

Examples are as follows:(a) ■■■■In this product, a girl who is easily recognized as an elementary school child wears swimwear and posesin a manner emphasizing her private parts and buttocks. (Tags like “suji”, “ω”, and “kuikomi” are linked
to the product to make it easy to search.) 21 It is obvious that the video exists to excite or stimulate
sexual desires. It is highly likely this material would fall under Art. 2.3(iii).
DELETED PICTURE

Contents: suji, ω, kuikomi, kiwa kiwa, opening legs, rodeo machine, taking a bath or shower, costume,
competitive swimming wear, bikini, swimwear, leotard, t-back, knee-highs, knee socks.21
Release Date: May 17, 2015
“Attractive, slender bodied ■■■’s image ‘Mo■■■n’”. She shows her slender legs in cool denim
shorts and changes to a strawberry bikini! In the scene where she lies on a bed in school
swimwear, she boldly opens her legs many times! You should pay attention to innocent ■■■’s
shower scene! In addition, ■■■ plays in a park with cat ears, changes into a bikini and plays withballoons, and dances in a room with lots of figurines. Your heart will beat faster when you see■■■ with a full smile. Then, in the last scene she wears a thin leotard! There are many points
you should not miss like suji, kuikomi, and ω!! This is a treasured work where you can find the
new charms of ■■■.”(b) A■i thirteen years old
In this product, a thirteen-year old girl wears revealing swimwear with straps and opens her legs toemphasize the shape of her private parts. In the introduction of the product, there is a description thatthe model’s age is 13, so it is likely that her age is under 18, and the video is strongly suspected to be
Art.2.3(iii) material.

21

The following terms have the following meanings: suji: “stretched tendon”, a pose in which the “v-line” tendons of the groin
are stretched out; “ω”: the shape of a girl’s genitalia through swimwear; kuikomi: “biting into”, clothing so tight it bites into theskin and exposes its contours; pochi: “small thing”, typically used for buttons, referring to nipples poking button-like throughcloth; “rodeo machine”: the pose or motion of bucking back and forth like on a rodeo horse machine; kiwa-kiwa, “just on theedge” of showing private parts; “t-back”, string underwear bottom that forms a T-shape in the back; “sailor suit”: the school
uniform for junior high and high school girls.

27

DELETED PICTURE

Contents: pochi, suji, ω, kuikomi, transparent, kiwa kiwa, balance ball, taking a bath or shower, costume,bikini, high-cut, t-back, sailor suit, blazer, knee highs, knee socks, maid.21“This sexy junior high school student who is popular in the junior world debuts in the under-15
label. This is “A■i” of ■■■■. B84, W55, H86... Is this a junior high school student’s body!? Very
resilient buttocks, flower-patterned swimwear, pink t-front bikini, red frill bikini, light blue superhigh-cut bikini, etc. Many bikinis beyond limitation are a must-see! In addition, she plays
harmonica in sailor suit, picks fruit in a cute maid outfit, takes a shower in a white lace onepiece, plays in the pool in a pink bikini, etc. Her innocent facial expression is so cute!
Furthermore, in chapter 2, in the scene where she lies down on a sofa in v-line swimwear, youwill find treasure-happening shots!!”
These images are sample images that are available on a website which everyone can access without any
special procedure like membership registration. Although the membership registration is required towatch the videos, once registered, it is presumed that more stimulating suspected child pornography
will become available. On the other hand, the website named “■■■■” displays a message that its
material is not child pornography, but it delivers images and videos of junior idols, and there were
products among them where the performers were half-naked or had their sexual parts emphasized, andsome products were strongly suspected to be child pornography.
DELETED PICTURE

5. Reflections from a health professional
In order to make an accurate estimation of the age of some performers, HRN engaged an experienced
pediatrician to identify the age of performers in several of the videos introduced in this report. The
pediatrician assessed the material by noting the facial characteristics, muscle development, breast
development and pubic hair of the performers.
(a) “Thirteen elementary sch■l students – Show all special!!”28

It seems that the performers are in upper elementary school.
(b) “Sixth grade, Real Lolita video, Backside”
It is difficult to judge the age of the performers because the material is vague.
(f) “■■■■”It seems that the performers are in upper elementary school or junior high school.
However, regarding the above products, when we showed the pictures on their packages, it was difficult
for the doctor to fully analyze the pictures. Subsequently, HRN asked the doctors to check the products(g), (h), (i) and (j) above. The doctor’s replies were as follows.
(g) “■■ who is 139 centimeters tall is an elementary sch■l student”
It is presumed that the performer is under 18. Although it is difficult to judge from her face and bodydevelopment, she may be in upper elementary school.
(h) “Grade 1 Class 3 No.2 ■■■■”
It is presumed that the performer is an elementary school student or junior high school student becauseof her bony framework and breast development.
(i) “Carrying off homebound elementary sch■l students and gang raping them”
Although the product contains various chapters, a girl who seems to be in upper elementary school or
junior high school and a girl who seems to be in junior high school were included among the performers.
(j) “Although it was job, I really hated it being filmed”
It is presumed that the performer is a junior high school student.
(j) In the same package was “Female high school student ■■■ is gang jacked”
It is presumed that the girl in the video is over 18.
6. Summary of the HRN Field Survey
As can be observed from the above, the investigation of physical retail stores and on the Internet
discovered that DVDs and videos which are or are suspected as child pornography are openly sold anddistributed. The following products investigated at retail stores are strongly suspected to be childpornography since they include the description “elementary sch■l students”, show sexual intercourse ofchild-like performers, and the performers seem to be younger than 18 years old. Furthermore, since theperformers conducted real sexual intercourse or pseudo-sexual intercourse, these products are
considered very harmful examples of child pornography.
●●“Thirteen elementary sch■l students – Show all special!!”“Sixth grade, Real Lolita video, Backside”
29

●
●

“■■ who is 139 centimeters tall is an elementary sch■l student”“Carrying off homebound elementary sch■l students and gang raping them”

Each of the products above were openly sold at the retail stores under investigation. HRN failed to findevidence of a thorough police investigation regarding these products. The reason these products are
openly sold is that there is no evidence to prove that the performers are younger than 18 years old.
However, investigating authorities should give first priority to products advertised as child pornography
or products which are sold by suggesting that their performers are younger than 18 years old. The saleand distribution of these products should be halted immediately through extensive monitoring andprosecution. Further, the products (f), (h), (m) and (n) are chakuero videos whose performers arestrongly suspected to be minors. Product (f) advertises a “Real JC 15 years old”; product (m) advertises a
14-year-old JC, and product (n) indicates a birth date for a person under 18. By doing so, these products
are advertising that the performers are minors.
Some of the products encountered during the retail stores investigations are also sold online by major
dealers, such as DMM for products (c), (e), (g), (h) and (i). Further, as for the online products (a) and (b),while they seem to be videos classified under Art. 2.3(iii), they are widely available through streaming.
These materials are strongly suspected to be child pornography.

30

Chapter 5: Industry Stakeholders
Based on the facts above, this chapter focuses on relevant stakeholders in the preparation, distribution,and promotion of child pornography.
1. Product Producers
Most of the producers who create the products casting performers under the age of 18 are notreviewed. Among the adult video producers, there are two types: (i) producers who belong to an NPO
called the Intellectual Property Promotion Association (“IPPA”) who are reviewed by a review
organization and (ii) independent producers who are not reviewed. IPPA is an industry organization for
adult videos. While around 240 companies belong to IPPA, most of them are producers. Producers
belonging to IPPA are reviewed by one of the following three review organizations by self-regulation.
● Japan Software Contents Review Center● Visual Software Contents Industry Coop (VSIC)● Ethics Organization of Japan Video Production and Sales (JVPS)
Videos of non-nude girls under the age of 18 are classified as “image videos” or chakuero. Most of the
producers who create these videos do not belong to IPPA, and these kinds of videos are not considered
to be products for adults because these do not show sexual intercourse or similar activities. Thus, unlike
adult videos (“AV”), it is said that these producers are not reviewed by any review association at all. A
video classified as AV whose performer is under the age of 18 could not pass a review association’s
review. According to interviews of the review associations and producers, some of the products
indicating that they are chakuero videos show some activities with men. Even in such cases, theproducts are not reviewed by a review association because they are not claimed to be for adults.
However, not all of the producers who create products suspected as child pornography are nonreviewed producers. “Minimum”, an affiliate of the adult producer CA, creates a Loli product whose
performer is less than 20 years old at first glance by advertising “a little girl who is shorter than 150cm.”
Further, according to interviews with industry participants, I.B. Works and First Star (whose review
association is VSIC) are producers creating a number of child pornography products. Among the
producers of the products which HRN identified through the retail stores and Internet investigations,
MANIAC belongs to JVPS and Zeus belongs to IPPA. We could not identify which review association“Puberty.com” and “Forbidden Fruits / Hallucination Gang” belong to.
There are many chakuero producers, such as ‘Shinkousha’, and there are many video producers of them,such as ‘Idol School and Guild’. Most of the products are videos of idols with swimming suits, but someproducts are extreme. It seems that some chakuero producers recently considered joining IPPA.
However, the possibility that their products would be considered child pornography and would not pass
the review process acts as an obstacle, and therefore the process for their entry has stalled. From an
inquiry to IPPA, it was found that among the 42 chakuero producers, eight producers were confirmed to31

be AV producers or distribution sites for various AV producers; but whether other producers belong to
IPPA or other review associations was not confirmed. Among the 27 producers, only one producer(which joined IPPA in August, 2016) belongs to IPPA.
2. Review Associations
As mentioned above, there are three review associations for AV products: Japan Software Contents
Review Center, Visual Software Contents Industry Coop (VSIC), and Japan Video Production and Sales(JVPS). Any producer belonging to the Intellectual Property Promotion Association (IPPA) must be
reviewed by one of the three associations. According to VSIC, the following is the history of theintegration of review associations. In 2012, the five main review associations—VSIC, Contents Soft
cooperative Association (CSA), JVPS, East Japan Contents Soft (EJCS), and All Japan Video Shinsa [Ethics
Review Association] (AJVS)—established IPPA, allowing the AV industry to jointly handle the issue ofvideo copying.
With respect to the history of the integration of review associations, the member producers of Nihon
Ethics of Video Association (NEVA) established the Ethics Review Organization of Japanese Video(EROJV) in 2008. In 2010, the Ethics Organization of Video (EOV) was established as a result of a merger
between two review bodies, CSA (“Media Ethics”) and EROJV. In January 2016, Japan Software Contents
Review Center was established as a result of the integration of Media Ethics, EJCS, and AJVS. At thepresent time, the main self-regulated review associations for adult video are Japan Software Contents
Review Center, VSICS (its investigation unit is registered as Ethics Association of Japanese Contents), and
JVPS.
3. Store Owners
Full details about the retail stores selling AV and image videos are unknown. Under Article 2(6) Item 5 of
the Law Regulating Adult Entertainment Businesses “a business selling or lending exclusively pictures,videos, or other things set forth in cabinet ordinances which arouse the sexual curiosity at its shops”
needs to obtain a license as an adult entertainment business.” “Exclusively” above is interpreted as 70
to 80 percent. So if 20 to 30 percent or more of the total goods being sold are something other thanadult goods, a license is not required. Most shops have over 20 to 30 percent of non-adult goods, and inthat case, there is no supervision by regulators.
Companies selling and/or lending DVDs, such as Culture Convenience Club Co., Ltd., Yodobashi Camera(Yodobashi.com) and Don Quijote Co., Ltd., have not clearly indicated their policy for dealing with adultproducts, especially child pornography, on their website. As for online stores, platforms and servers
where customers themselves sell their own products, discussed in detail below, companies prohibit thesale of child pornography under their terms of services. Although Sell Media Network Association(established in 1999) is the industry association for AV shops, it does not include all AV shops. It is
assumed that there are around 1,000 AV shops in Japan. There are 143 shop members of such
associations. So the ratio of AV shop members to the total number of AV shops is less than 15 percent,32

assuming that the total number of the AV shops is 1,000. Lammtarra, a major AV shop where a retailstore investigation was conducted belongs to the Sell Media Network Association.
4. Delivery, Rental Service and Wholesale Stores(1) Delivery and rental service
The largest AV site for mail-order and delivery is DMM. DMM’s ethics standards for its video areequivalent to the standards of NEVA, VSIC, CSA, AJVS, and JVPS, with the products of other ethics
association and self-regulating producers following in-house standards. As for DMM’s Adult Auction, it
is stated that only women who are older than 18 years old, who are not high school students, and who
have submitted IDs with photos are featured in their products. There is, however, no similar statement
for videos.
Amazon is another example of an online shopping company. Aichi Police raided Amazon in January 2015
after finding child pornography products on their website online, and the responsible persons wereprosecuted in March. Amazon’s sales policy states “the registration of products which include images ofchildren under the age of 18 that provide sexual stimulus or are provocative is prohibited”. However,while it states that products violating this policy will be deleted, as the above child pornography
products were published, it was judged that Amazon Japan’s measures were insufficient. After theabove incident, Amazon Japan has made efforts to reinforce its preventative measures in response to
the prefectural police’s request.
The largest rental video shop is TSUTAYA. The industry association for their rental videos is the Compact
Disc & Video Rental Commerce Trade Association of Japan. Any policy regarding child pornography could
not be identified on their website.
(2) Wholesale Stores
According to the information provided from Sell Media Network Association and others, the wholesaleretailers for AV stores are: Yokohama Scramble Company, ML Works, Tokyo Sell Video Sales, CS, Sanwa
Soft, Tees, Eiten, Jeid Airfoward, and VOC.
While we also checked the websites of the retailers above, other than CS and Tees which do not havewebsites, their policies regarding child pornography were not stated. In addition, there are many cases
where a major producer has an affiliated company for distribution. For CA, TIS conducts distribution. As
for the products SOD creates, Soft On Demand conducts distribution. AV stores, however, have and sell
products which do not pass through wholesale retailers.

33(3) Online sales and Applications
With respect to the dissemination of child pornography online, the main issues are how providers andsearch engines block child pornography content, and how servers, which often handle adult content,
deal with child pornography. Furthermore, with the recent growing popularity of smart phones, the roleof app stores has become more important.

34

Chapter 6: The Efforts of Relevant Institutions
Based on the considerations above, HRN researched the efforts of relevant institutions regarding theremoval of child pornography. As a result, we identified the following reasons which explain the generallack in their effectiveness.
1. Systemic flaws leading to ineffective control over child pornography in JapanThe following three points are the main structural reasons for a system resulting in ineffective control
over child pornography.
1. If the age of a performer is unclear and it cannot be determined whether he or she is a “child” ornot, the police do not investigate.
2. The screening system at the review, distribution, and sales stages is inadequate.
3. The content check system for material categorized under Art. 2.3(iii) is inadequate.
With respect to this matter, the following facts were confirmed in our research.
a. Most of the producers who create video content of performers under the age of 18 are notincluded within the structure of reviews by review associations which are part of IPPA.
b. Even when review associations conduct reviews, they avoid checking the age of performers
because of previously established trust relationships with producers.
c. Also, an adequate review system has not been confirmed for wholesale retailers.
d. The retail stores do not check the age of the performers when they receive videos because of
the trust relationship between producers and store owners.
e. The police do not thoroughly investigate due to the difficulty of proving that a particular productis indeed child pornography “because the age of the performer is unknown.” Therefore, “even if
there is a suspicious product at a shop, it cannot be prosecuted.” There seems to an unwritten
rule that “products which are openly sold at shops cannot possibly be child pornography.”
Furthermore, because the net patrol for “malicious” online child pornography is prioritized,
current investigations do not focus on suspicious child pornography products sold at retailstores. Material categorized under Art. 2.3(iii) seems to be particularly disregarded.
In this situation, even if a producer not under any review process creates child pornography products, it
is likely that the relevant parties and institutions believe, without any evidence, that the producer
cannot have conducted an illegal activity. Therefore they do not check the age of the performers, and as
a result there is no follow up. The monitoring system currently in place is thus extremely weak.
If the stores kept documents on the age of performers in videos suspected to be under 18 or of videos
overtly advertised as being such, the police could check the age and take necessary action during
investigations. There is, however, no such policy. A social recognition of the illegality of material
categorized under Art. 2.3(iii) is also lacking. This contributes to the insufficient efforts by police and35

stakeholders in regulating this material. In the “Third Comprehensive Measures to Eliminate Child
Pornography” issued by the Crime Prevention Ministerial Conference in July 2016, “thorough arrests formalicious child pornography” was emphasized as the policy for “strengthening the crackdown againstchild pornography.” Thus it appears that priority is placed on the control of pornographic items under
Art. 2.3(i) and Art. 2.3(ii) and not under Art. 2.3(iii).
2. Interviews with the National Police Agency and Metropolitan Police Department
Based on the fourth investigation, the HRN investigation team sent a written inquiry to the National
Police Agency and the Metropolitan Police Department in November 2015 to ask how they handle theissue of child pornography.
The team managed to interview the National Police Agency and the Metropolitan Police Department in
December 2015. At the interview, the HRN investigation team presented pictures of several DVDs whichwere suspected to be child pornography and asked whether they were considered to be categorizedunder Art. 2.3(i) and Art. 2.3(ii) or under Art. 2.3(iii) of the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography
Prohibition Act.
The products the HRN investigation team asked about included the following two products:(a)“Thirteen elementary sch■l students – Show all special!!”(b)“Sixth grade, Real Lolita video, Backside”(1) Interview with the National Police Agency
The National Police Agency explained their efforts to eliminate child pornography. In regards to HRN’s
investigation, they could not make any comments on individual products. They issued the following
statements:●●●●

With respect to child pornography, the National Policy Agency is reinforcing their response bymainly focusing on online patrols.
They are actively investigating child pornography, considering the harm this inflicts on victims.
If the age of the performer is not confirmed, it cannot be proven that the product is childpornography.
If the age of the performer is uncertain, expert opinion is sought.

(2) Interview with the Metropolitan Police Department
We also asked the Metropolitan Police Department whether products (a) and (b) are considered to be
child pornography. They explained that they could not reply to individual cases, and we could notreceive a concrete response. Further, we asked for their views on the argument that “streaming video is
not illegal child pornography” made by a business operator who manages a website which includes childpornography. They, however, said that they could not give a concrete response. In addition, based on36

the current situation where the categories of chakuero and image videos are widespread, we asked
them whether these videos are categorized under Art. 2.3(iii). The Metropolitan Police Department,
however, merely stated that they do not use the categorization of chakuero and that they determine
whether an individual product is child pornography.
We also received the following responses from the Metropolitan Police Department to our questions
regarding child pornography.
1. When they determine whether a product is child pornography, they do not determine this basedon the advertising language on the packaging of DVDs. For example, even if a package says “16years old,” it is not unusual that an actress who is 18 years old or above plays the role of a 16
year-old girl. As for products whose packaging states “Rape girls” and “Child pornography,” theirperformers are not necessarily under the age of 18. The same is true of video products. If it issuspected that the performer is a child, they make determinations based on the opinions of
medical professionals. (They did not disclose the personal information of these medical
professionals.) If the Metropolitan Police Department determines a product violates the law, thecase is sent to the Public Prosecutor’s Office. Even if the child victim cannot be identified, thecase can be sent to the Public Prosecutor’s Office based on the opinion of the medical
professionals consulted.
2. The Metropolitan Police Department actively collects information through the “childpornography hotline” and “cyber patrols”, and if compromising information is found, theMetropolitan Police Department or relevant police station takes action.
3. Ever since the penalty for possession of child pornography was enacted, inquiries into whether
an individual video or picture is child pornography have increased, but the police do not respondto individual cases. They, however, are advising against the possession of anything suspected ofbeing child pornography and encourage individuals and stores to relinquish such material
voluntarily.
4. Next to child pornography producers, the MPD also investigates retailers if they violate the law.
5. To assist the recovery of victims of child pornography, the police sometimes connect victims
with psychology experts, allowing the victims to consult with the experts.
6. While arrests for child pornography when victim identification is difficult should be conductedwithin the current legal framework, each regional police station tailors its response to theprevalence of the activities in their region.
While there are no regulations which provide for the management of child pornography investigations,police conduct training for concrete cases and prepare work materials. In addition, they pointed out
issues specific to child pornography, such as cases where a child takes pictures of him or herself anddiscloses them to a third party, and cases where a parent of the victim is involved.
On 30 September 2015, Kanagawa Police arrested seven people, including the senior managers ofMediajyu (a wholesale retailer in Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo) and E Media Commerce (a retailer in Okegawa-shi,
Saitama), for allegedly selling chakuero DVDs in violation of the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography
Prohibition Act. Asahi Newspaper stated, “It used to be difficult to prove the illegality of chakuero
37

because its performers are not fully naked. However, the revision of the said law in June last year
clarified the definition of videos falling under the category of chakuero, which enabled the police toarrest suspects by applying the revised version of the definition of child pornography.” Furthermore, on
4 June 2016, the National Police Agency (NPA) Community Safety Bureau Safety Division arrested thepresident of Escom (a DVD producer and retailer) on the suspicion of distributing obscene electronic or
magnetic records. According to the Division, the reason for the arrest is that the company produced
images and video corresponding to the chakuero category, where the performer mainly wears a small
swimming suit, and sold these videos at “Shibuya Shoten.com” (an online shopping website managed by
the company) and others. There were obscene videos where the private parts of performers can be seen
through thin underwear or wraps.
On 21 July 2016, the National Police Agency Community Safety Bureau Safety Division sent two
documents, “The appropriate review of chakuero DVDs (Request)” (hereinafter “Review Notice”) and“The appropriate sales of DVDs (Request)” (hereinafter “Sales Notice”) to related institutions. The
former document was sent to IPPA, and the latter document was sent to DVD retailers and DVD
handling companies, such as EC stores. In these documents, the National Police Agency stated, withrespect to what is thought to be the 4 June 2016 arrest mentioned above, “We exposed a producer andretailer of obscene DVDs and arrested the director of the company.” In this case, the company soldobscene DVDs produced by the company itself as “chakuero DVDs” on its homepage, in its directly
managed store, and on major online shopping websites.
Furthermore, these DVDs are openly sold at stores and online. This not only undermines public morals,
but it also has an impact on the sound upbringing of youth. The NPA Review Notice states, “We arerequesting each relevant party to ask its member companies to have DVDs including sexual expression
reviewed and to be more careful when reviewing products requested by the production company.” In
addition, the Review Notice provides: “We are requesting each relevant party to confirm the contents ofDVDs including sexual expression, to make efforts to protect healthy sexual order, and to prevent
reoccurrences.” The Sales Notice asks for organizations to “continue providing us with information on
obscene child pornography cases, and to please continue to cooperate with our investigations.”
Although these documents do not refer to child pornography falling under item (iii), they request strict
review and confirmation of non-reviewed chakuero DVDs at the time of transactions for theinvestigation of child pornography. We hope these strict reviews and confirmations will continue in the
future.
3. Review Associations and the Intellectual Property Promotion Association
HRN conducted question-and-answer sessions during its visits to the Japan Software Contents Review
Center (“Center”) on 1 July 2016, VSIC on 14 July 2016, and also when the latter visited HRN on 10
August.

38

(1) Japan Contents Review Center’s efforts
The Center summarized the issues above and the reality of the review process in the field. Questions
regarded the review of child pornography. HRN showed the (g) to (j) videos and asked whether thesehave been reviewed by the review association. The questions and answers are as follows.
(HRN Q) Have you reviewed the (g) to (j) videos?
(CENTER A) Among the (g) to (j) videos, there is no product which has passed the Japan Contents
Review Center’s review and been distributed. Only product (g) has gone through ascreening, and judging from the indications on its packaging, it seems that it was VSIC who
reviewed it. Video products of a girl under the age of 18 are classified as “imagery andvideo”. Therefore, they are not considered adult-targeted products and are not screened
at all. This is a big problem. Although centers have their own review standards, videos
such as these do not pass through review. Under the review standards, packaging whichindicates that the performer’s age is below 18, such as “elementary school student” or“such-and-such grade and class”, etc., are not allowed, and they cannot pass thescreening even if parts of the words are censored. A video whose performer has a school
bag or a yellow hat specific to children suggests that the performer is a minor, so it cannot
be allowed under the review either. [Referring to the performer in the (h) product:] It isstrongly suspected that the performer is less than 18 years old. The current situation
whereby these products are distributed is a big concern.
(Q)

Do you disclose the review standard?

(A)

No. It is difficult to disclose it.

(Q)

Among the products brought in by the producers, there are some products whose
packaging says “girls” or indicates “loli”, and others whose performers look like minors.
What is the review process for these products?

(A)

These products have gone through review, but generally, we do not check the age of theperformers. In the past, speaking about products whose performers are suspected to beminors, we sometimes checked the ages by documents. However, we have not done thatrecently. The producer is expected to fully understand that child pornography is notallowed, partly because of the existence of the Child Pornography Act. We have a trust
relationship with IPPA member producers, so we have not reviewed ages under theassumption that products must not be child pornography.

39

(Q)

You said you reviewed products at some time in the past whose performers weresuspected to be minors. Did you review all of the products whose packaging said “loli” or“girl”? If not, under what standard did you review?

(A)

We did not review all of the products that mentioned “loli” or “girl”. There is no clear
standard.

(2) Visual Software Contents Industry Corporation
The number of companies that belong to IPPA is 240, and 73 companies belong to VSIC. The councilors(three people) prepare the review standard (“Standards Document”). Because the law is arbitrary, VSIC
notifies producers of details not mentioned in law such as the unified minimum standard line. Because
the Standards Document is an internal guideline, generally it is not disclosed; but if requested by the
producer, it is disclosed. The review is delegated to the Ethic Association of Japanese Contents and isconducted in accordance with the Standards Document.
There was a revision of the review standard in 2015, and the standard has become stricter since January
2015. Any descriptions with a connotation of underage performers, such as a school bag, elementary
school student, JC, JS, Grade 1 Class C, and the like have become unacceptable (since January 2015). Its
intention is to improve the low standard of Japan when compared to the world standard. A high school
student is generally allowed. In addition, we determined that sexual intercourse with an animal is not
accepted during reviews ever since the amended standard came into effect in January 2015. As for
torture play, if it involves bleeding, generally it is not acceptable. But it is acceptable if it is SM playwhich does not involve bleeding. Scatological play is also accepted because such a category has been
established. Whether sexual intercourse is actually conducted is not judged, and the thickness of themosaic is checked.
Regarding VSIC’s review standard for child pornography, currently the review is conducted inaccordance with the new standard applied after January 2015. As for the confirmation that theperformer is not a person under the age of 18, generally the producer checks the age and submits acertification to VSIC.
(Q)

Does the review association double-check the age?

(A)

No. The producer has primary responsibility.

(Q)

Have you reviewed the (g) to (j) videos?

(A)

VSIC reviewed (g), but this was created a long time ago. This could not be passed under
the review standard revised in 2015.

(Q)

The (g) DVD was sold at AV stores in 2016. Does this mean that once they have passed
the review, products with your certification mark are being distributed even if they are
not acceptable under the current review standards?
40

(A)

We are considering complete compilations. There was a proposal that, if five videos(created over five years ago) are sold as a pack, they should be re-screened. However,
we could not reach an agreement partly because the previous review standards for the
trademark rights and portrait rights were lenient. It will be our task to think of ways toaddress the issues entailed by the distribution of products which have been passed
under previous review standards.

(3) Recent Efforts of the Intellectual Property Promotion Association (IPPA)
As a result of HRN’s interview with IPPA and review associations after June 2016, concerns wereexpressed that, among the imagery and videos yet to receive review, there are products being
advertised and sold as child pornography whose contents do not pass review. On 13 July 2016, IPPA senta document entitled “Request to stop handling non-reviewed products” to business operators handling
AV products.

With respect to AV products, most producers join our association as well as Visual Software Contents
Industry Coop (“VSIC”) and the Japan Video Production Software Sales Ethics Group (“JVPS”), who areboth member associations of IPPA. As such, the producers will have their product contents inspected(ethics screening and inspection) by a third party and will sell ones that have passed the inspection
process. This is not a requirement under the law but is institutionalized as a self-regulative measure within
the AV industry in order to deliver products created in accordance with certain rules to business operatorsand consumers handling the end products.
However, despite the existence of such rules, the number of unscreened products is not so few, so that
producers not belonging to any association apply their own rules and judgments upon production. As
such, there is a situation in which screened products and unscreened products are sold, rented, andtransmitted on equal terms.
However, there has been an effort to improve the soundness of the AV industry as a response to social
demand. With such circumstances observed in the industry, as an association promoting the distributionof screened/inspected products, IPPA and also member producers who voluntarily go through screening
and inspection cannot ignore the continuance of such a situation. We are requesting all of you handling
AV products to consider and agree to handle only AV products which are reviewed/ inspected by the threeassociations related to IPPA and the Ethics Organization of Computer Software (“EOCS”).

IPPA also expressed “We accept the request with sincerity and will promote efforts to improve thesoundness of the industry” as its response to “The appropriate review of chakuero DVDs (Request)”
issued by the National Police Agency Community Safety Bureau Safety Division on 21 July 2016.
As a result of HRN’s investigation, however, the following were found.

41

1. Among the reviewed products, there are some products which are suspected to be childpornography, like product (g).
2. Zeus, which creates product (h) “Grade 1 Class 3 ■■■■”, is a member of IPPA, but that producthas not been reviewed and is suspected to be child pornography.
3. Product (i) indicates that MANIAC is the producer, and it seems that MANIAC is a member of
JVPS. However, this product has not been reviewed and is suspected to be child pornography.
Therefore, it cannot be said that being a member of a review association will solve all problems. There isan urgent need to further tighten the standards of review associations, to carry out thorough age
checks, and to take measures for the distribution of non-reviewed products. Furthermore, theambiguous position of material categorized under Art. 2.3(iii) should be clarified.
4. Policy Developments Addressing Physical Retail Stores(1) Visit to the Self Media Network Association
On 4 August 2016, HRN visited the Self Media Network Association (SMNA) and asked the following twoquestions:
1. We have confirmed that non-reviewed products which are suspected to be child pornography
are sold at member stores. Do the stores take measures such as age checks? Is there a unified
policy in the Self Media Network Association?
2. Do you comply with “The appropriate sales of chakuero DVDs (Request)” (“Sales Notice”) issued
by the police on 21 July?
The followings are the responses from the Self Media Network Association.
As for (1), there is no unified policy for age checks regarding child pornography.
As for (2), an emergency board meeting took place the day before HRN’s visit. As a result of the
discussion, we, as an association, accepted the police request and will not sell non-reviewed DVDs,
and we will notify and instruct this to our members.
(2) The reason why a decision like (2) above had not been made yet
As the retail industry originally developed for non-reviewed independent producers, mid- or small-sized
stores in particular, survived by differentiating themselves from competitors by selling rare productsthat are not sold by major AV producers. It is an issue of profit. It was pointed out that it would havebeen difficult to prohibit the sale of non-reviewed products for this reason.
(3) Alerting Stores to the Presence of Child Pornography
According to SMNA, it originally instigated a criminal case (the so-called Bakki case) after it instructed all
members to prohibit the sale of a video made by AV producer Bakki Visual Planning containing severe

42sexual assault after receiving information from one of its members. 22 This later became the basis of acriminal case. SMNA also first raised issues about an offending video which later led to arrests, the socalled NEVA case. 23 The association was the first to call for the voluntarily ban of sales of the offending
video once it determined the serious illegality of its contents, which included “thin mosaics, childpornography, chakuero, and synthetic cannabis.”
However, SMNA’s efforts to end child pornography have not been sufficient. At the time the review
association Media Ethics was active, it conducted voluntary monitoring of chakuero with no formal
review. As a result, if sales of chakuero were identified, SMNA often received a warning notice providing
information about the violation and a request not to sell the offending product because it is childpornography. When such a notice was received, SMNA shared the information with its member stores
and alerted them to stop the product’s sale. Since Media Ethics ended and was restructure into a newentity, SMNA has not issued such alerts because there have been no voluntary monitoring and warning
notices. SMNA hired staff who are former policemen, and it regularly visited and alerted stores, but it ispossible that some cases were overlooked. While SMNA makes requests for member company
compliance by sending them documents listing the items to be regulated at the time the company joins,there are some items for which it is difficult to get compliance and to gain consensus. The current
finalized agreement on items is not disclosed, and it seems to be unclear.
(4) Results of the Investigation
While we informed SMNA of the results of our retail store investigation described in Chapter 4 and that
one investigated store is a member of its association, SMNA stated that they “did not oversee all cases
thoroughly.” It is difficult for SMNA to oversee or instruct its members. While SMNA has established arule stating that stores cannot use verbal monitoring for the protection of juveniles when selling adultproducts, major adult stores take the lead in violating this rule. As such, currently the instruction is not
carried out adequately.
Even if IPPA requests stores to only sell reviewed products and the Metropolitan Police Department
requests a careful approach towards non-reviewed DVDs, SMNA feels that it will be difficult to eliminate
non-reviewed DVDs solely through internal controls. Even if the association reaches a consensus, thestores that do not belong to the association will not stop selling non-reviewed products in order todifferentiate themselves from other stores. External pressure is an important factor. If IPPA decides not
to sell formal products to the stores that are selling non-reviewed products, the stores will comply withsuch a decision. On 5 August 2016, the day after HRN representatives visited SMNA, the following
document was released on the association’s website:
22

The Bakki case involved the AV producer Bakki Visual Planning (“Bakki”), representatives of which were found criminallyresponsible, the owner receiving an 18-year sentence, for drugging and raping an 18 year old woman for an AV video in which
she suffered severe internal injuries and was hospitalized for over a month. See, Human Rights Now, “Human Rights Violations
against Women and Girls Manifesting from the Adult Pornographic Film Industry in Japan”, 3 Mar. 2016, pp 11, 30,
http://hrn.or.jp/eng/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ReportonAVindustry-20160303-tentative-translation.pdf
23“Video censor, others held over obscene DVDs”, Japan Times, 2 Mar. 2008,https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2008/03/02/national/video-censor-others-held-over-obscene-dvds/#.WmGycDeYNPa. In
the case, it was revealed that the head of screening for the Nihon Ethics of Video Association (NEVA) and four other NEVA staff
were involved in allowing the violating video to pass its screening, leading to their arrest.

43

Sell Media Network Association completely accepts “The appropriate sales of DVDs” (Ho, KazeNo. 1160) issued by the Safety Division of the Community Safety Bureau of the Metropolitan
Police Department, and will cooperate to prevent reoccurrences. We understand that this is arequest for not only our members located in the region covered by the Metropolitan Police
Department but also our members located in all regions of Japan. We will discuss andcoordinate with the relevant associations, and we will contribute to the health of the AV
industry and the sound growth of children.
Sell Media Network Association
President Motoyoshi Motizuki
5. Policy developments addressing Internet-related Services
As for Internet related companies, providers and rental servers are involved when users access theirwebsites. Furthermore, when a user looks for a website containing child pornography, there must be aprocess in which a user inserts some keywords in a search engine, such as Google. In addition, recently
applications focusing on smart phones that include adult content, including child pornography, havebeen developed and sold. Child pornography is provided on the Internet as follows. (1) The provider ofchild pornography completes the server provision agreement with the rental server provider and createsa website to which child pornography is uploaded. (2) The user completes the provider provisionagreement with the Internet provider, and access is given to such website through the Internet. As such,in the process above, the provider is involved in the user’s access/non-access to the internet, and therental server provider is involved in the admission/rejection of the website manager’s website.
(1) Internet Providers
Each Internet provider has the same policy for handling child pornography. Internet providers receive alist of “Internet addresses involving child pornography” from Internet Contents Safety Association, andthe providers’ block the relevant site (i.e., prohibit users from accessing the relevant website).
Example policies:
OCN: http://www.ocn.ne.jp/info/announce/2011/04/21_1.html
OCN will receive an address list involving child pornography from Internet Contents Safety
Association (ICSA), and will limit access to the relevant sites. If you try to access the sites set
forth in the list, you will find the following picture, indicating that access is blocked instead of
the blocked site.
Yahoo! BB: http://www.softbank.jp/ybb/block/
KDDI: http://www.kddi.com/corporate/news_release/2011/0421/
BIGLOBE: http://support.biglobe.ne.jp/news/news338.html

44

Furthermore, as for ordinary adult content and other contents classified as alcohol, tobacco, drugs, orviolence, there is a service providing a filter function which can restrict the access to the website basedon the level of the contents, considering any effects on minors.
Examples:Nifty “All Time Safety Security 24 Plus” Options:●●●“Elementary school/junior high school students” mode. All categories are restricted.
“High School students” mode. All categories are restricted except Internet communications
media, news, and computer games, which have no restrictions.
Custom mode: The user can select the restricted categories.

Purara “Net Barrier Basic” Options:●●●Level 2 (ON): “Basic Standard.” Access is blocked to sites which are harmful to juveniles(violence, adult content, etc.); sites which encourage criminal behavior, such as sexual abuseagainst children or child prostitution (child pornography); and dangerous sites for security
purposes (one click fraud, phishing, etc.)
Level 1 (ON): Access is blocked to dangerous sites for security purposes (one click fraud,phishing, etc.).
Level 0 (OFF): No restrictions (same as filter cancelation)(2) Rental-server Providers
As for the servers actively dealing with adult content, the servers’ laws generally govern how childpornography is treated. The terms of services prohibit illegal contents, and in some cases there are
additional provisions related to individual contents, such child pornography or abuse. The violation of
the terms of services leads to the cancellation of the server provision agreement. The following is acomparison among the three major adult contents servers.
●

FC2 rental server: http://help.fc2.com/common/tos/ja
This server actively deals with adult content, and Nevada, U.S., laws apply to it. While the terms ofservice prohibit “activities which harm the sound development of juveniles (such as sending or
posting any document or picture of child pornography, child prostitution, bestiality, or violence)or the encouragement of such activity”, the terms of services do not refer to other obscene adultcontents. As a result, this server is regarded as a very generous server for adult content.

●

FUTOKA rental server: https://www.futoka.jp/?mode=policy
While this server also actively manages adult content, because Japanese law applies to thisserver, the terms of membership prohibit any activity in violation of law. There is, however, no
specific provision regarding child pornography.

45

●

KAGOYA shared server: http://www.kagoya.jp/terms/kir.html
Article 11 of the terms of service prohibits “any activity sending or displaying pictures, video,
voice, or document, etc., of obscene material, child pornography, or child abuse, or sales of amedia recording of such an activity, or any activity displaying or sending an advertisement whichmakes viewers believe such material is being sent, displayed, or sold” or any other general illegal
activity (applying Japanese law). If there is a violation, access may be limited or membership may
be cancelled. As for the standard for “obscene adult content”, its homepage states the following:“Please consider the books distributed at an ordinary books store or the products distributed at amajor rental video shop as forming the rough standard. However, pictures showing sexual organs
are deemed as ‘obscene’, even if there is a mosaic.”●

Vectant (ARTERIA Networks)
https://www.marubeni-access.com/ja/service/vectant/*****, a website which displays content which seems to be item (iii) pornography, uses ARTERIA
Networks. ARTERIA Networks is also an internet provider, and it has a policy, “Blocking access tochild pornography”, to mandatorily block access to child pornography websites in accordancewith the address list for child pornography websites received from the Internet Contents Safety
Association in the same manner as other providers above. Although such a policy has been
expressed, access to the ***** website has not been blocked. Thus, there is a possibility that theaddress list issued by ICSA does not include the **** or ***** websites.
ICSA prepares the address list based on the list of sites that are reported to the Internet Hotline
Center after conducting its own examination in accordance with the previously determined
standard. It is uncertain how ICSA determines contents labeled as “image video” of “junior idol”
or sites displaying chakuero. As such, while internet providers and adult video site servers clearlystate their policy to prohibit contents which violate the governing laws, in reality, sites whichunambiguously arouse or stimulate sexual arousal, such as *****, remain unchecked. Illegal item(iii) pornography is thus slipping through the cracks of regulations by using the terms chakuero
and image video, which give the impression that they are not pornography, resulting indifferences between regulations and reality.

(3) Search Engines
As for the efforts of search engines, a site such as Google excludes websites from search results which it
determines to contain child pornography in order to prevent displays of child pornography as results ofsearches. Google has also made efforts such as detecting child pornography in Gmail attachments,
reporting hits to the relevant authorities, and developing a system which automatically detects andblocks imagery suspected to be child pornography in cooperation with different social networking
systems such as Facebook and Twitter, who share information with it. Further, when HRN asked Google
Japan, Inc., about its actions against child pornography, they replied that, in addition to the imagery
detection system, they also share information with ICSA and cooperate with the relevant authorities
such as the National Police Agency and Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (as of 1
46

September 2016). Despite the above-mentioned actions, however, it is still the case that users can easily
access child pornographic content when they make some modifications to the keywords.
(4) Online Applications
The process of an app reaching users’ hands is as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.

An app creator (“App Developer”) develops software.
The software goes through app providers (“App Store”), such as an App Store’s review.
After passing that review, the app is distributed on App Stores.
Users obtain the app by downloading it from an App Store.

The review process of smartphone apps is typically lenient, and this enables even amateurs to easily
participate in the market. Therefore the focus will be on smartphone apps in this section. Smartphone
apps can be classified into two broad categories, apps for iPhone and for Android, and each of them has
its own review standard (“Guideline”). Any app which does not meet the review standard will berejected (“Rejection”) and will not be distributed on the respective App Store. Despite such efforts,
however, in 2015 an app developer’s crime was exposed after he posted online child pornographic
contents in violation of the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act.
● iPhone: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/
While child pornography is not explicitly subject to the iPhone Guideline, an app can be subject toRejection if (1) it has the intent of stimulating erotic feelings as set forth in Article 1.1.4 of the
Guideline or, (2) it involves user-created contents (e.g. SNS, video sharing website, blog etc.) whose
main purpose is primarily for pornographic contents as set forth in Article 1.2 of the Guideline.
● Android: https://play.google.com/intl/ja_ALL/about/restricted-content/child-endangerment/
According to Android’s Guideline, “Google has a zero tolerance policy against child sexual abuse
imagery. If we become aware of any content with child sexual abuse imagery, we will report it to theappropriate authorities and delete the Google Accounts of those involved with the distribution.”
Furthermore, regardless of whether an app contains child pornography, Google does not “allow
apps that contain or promote sexually explicit content, such as pornography. In general, we don’tallow content or services intended to be sexually gratifying.”
As mentioned above, each of the internet related business operators has taken some measures to blockusers’ access to child pornography. Despite these efforts, however, child pornography is still widespreadon the Internet, and users can easily gain access to such content. Due to its unique characteristics, theInternet poses significant challenges to the prosecution of child pornography.

47

Chapter 7: International Human Rights Standards
It is difficult to say that the actual situation in Japan regarding child pornography is sufficiently meetingthe standards of international human rights, including the standards set by human rights treaties ratified
by the Japanese government itself.
1. International human rights laws and standards regarding child pornography(1) Related international human rights laws and standardsa) Overview
Among treaties currently ratified by the Japanese government, the following treaties refer directly tochild pornography: (1) Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), (2) Worst Forms of Child Labour
Convention, 1999 (No. 182) (ILO Convention No. 182), (3) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the
Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography (CRC Optional
Protocol (CP)), and (4) Convention on Cybercrime.
b) Convention on the Rights of the Child (adopted by the United Nations in 1989, signed by Japan in
1990, ratified and came into force in Japan in 1994) 24
This is the first convention that directly refers to the rights of children. Article 34 requires contracting
parties to take all appropriate measures to eradicate sexual exploitation of children; however, it does
not mention any specific measures to be taken by contracting countries.

Article 34.
States Parties undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For
these purposes, States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateralmeasures to prevent:[…](c) The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials.

24

UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p.
3, http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html

48c) Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182) (ILO Convention No. 182) (adopted by ILO
in 1999 and ratified by Japan in 2001) 25
Discussions on the protection of children’s rights made progress from the 1990s onward, culminating in
the adoption of this convention. The convention defined child pornography as “the worst forms of childlabour” (Article 3), and it required contracting parties to design and implement programs of action toeliminate, as a priority, the worst forms of child labour (Article 6), to take measures such as providing
prevention, assistance, and education (Article 7), and to take measures through international
cooperation (Article 8). In particular, the Convention required contracting parties to admit that sexual
exploitation of children, including child pornography, are criminal offences (Paragraph 12).
Article 3.
For the purposes of this Convention, the term the worst forms of child labour comprises:[…](b) the use, procuring or offering of a child for prostitution, for the production of pornography or for
pornographic performances: Recommendation concerning the prohibition and immediate action for theelimination of the worst forms of child labour (No. 190) (Paragraph 12)
12. Members should provide that the following worst forms of child labour are criminal offences:[…](b) the use, procuring or offering of a child for prostitution, for the production of pornography or for
pornographic performances:[…]d) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, childprostitution, and child pornography (CRC Optional Protocol (CP)) (adopted by the United Nations in
2000, ratified and coming into force in Japan in 2005) 26
This protocol mainly focuses on Article 34 of the CRC, and it is described to be the first international
instrument that provides comprehensive and specific provisions in relation to the commercial andsexual exploitation of children. In particular, with respect to the definition of child pornography (Article2(c)), it should be noted that this protocol includes any representation that makes recipients think that achild is engaging in sexual activities (e.g., “simulated” sexual activities), as well as any representation
where a child is actually engaging in real and explicit sexual activities.
25

International Labour Organization (ILO), Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, C182, 17 June 1999, C182,
http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb6e0c4.html
26
UN General Assembly, Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution
and Child Pornography, 25 May 2000, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx.

49

The CRC Optional Protocol (CP) also requires the contracting parties to admit that the following activities
are criminal offences (Article 3): producing, distributing, importing, exporting, offering, selling or
possessing for the purposes of doing the same. In addition, the CRC Optional Protocol (CP) specifies
penal provisions, including establishment of jurisdiction (Article 4), extradition of offenders (Article 5),international assistance in connection with investigations or related proceedings (Article 6), seizure andconfiscation of criminal proceeds (Article 7), as well as protection measures such as informing the victim
and protecting the victim’s privacy (Article 8) and education and enlightenment activities (Article 9).
i. Article 2
Article 2.
For the purposes of the present Protocol:(c) Child pornography means any representation, by whatever means, of a child engaged in real or
simulated explicit sexual activities or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual
purposes.

ii. Article 3
Article 3.
1. Each State Party shall ensure that, as a minimum, the following acts and activities are fully covered
under its criminal or penal law, whether such offences are committed domestically or transnationally oron an individual or organized basis:[…](c) Producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering, selling or possessing for theabove purposes child pornography as defined in article 2.
[…]e) Convention on Cybercrime (adopted by the Council of Europe in 2001, signed by Japan in 2001, andcoming into force in Japan in 2002) 27
In the year following the CRC Optional Protocol (CP), the Council of Europe, a regional organization in
Europe, adopted this convention, which addresses child pornography related crimes on the Internet.
First, with respect to the comprehensive definition of child pornography under Article 9(2), theConvention states that pornographic material which visually depicts “a person appearing to be a minor
engaged in sexually explicit conduct” (Art. 9(2)(b)) should be included in the definition, as well as
27

Council of Europe, Convention on Cybercrime, 23 November 2001, http://www.refworld.org/docid/47fdfb202.html

50

materials depicting “a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct” (Art. 9(2)(a)), and it provides penalties
for child pornography related activities as follows.
i. Article 9
Article 9.
1. Each Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal
offences under its domestic law, when committed intentionally and without right, the following conduct:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

producing child pornography for the purpose of its distribution through a computer system;
offering or making available child pornography through a computer system;
distributing or transmitting child pornography through a computer system;
procuring child pornography through a computer system for oneself or for another person;
possessing child pornography in a computer system or on a computer-data storage medium.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1 above, the term "child pornography" shall include pornographic
material that visually depicts:a.
a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct;b. a person appearing to be a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct;[…]
4. Each Party may reserve the right not to apply, in whole or in part, paragraphs 1, sub-paragraphs d. ande, and 2, sub-paragraphs b. and c.

2. The Current Situation in Japan
In order to meet international standards and requests from international society, Japan enacted theChild Pornography Act and amended it twice. However, as mentioned in this report, the implementationof the regulation is insufficient, and therefore the current situation is still far from eliminating childpornography. In its Concluding Observations on the Japanese government’s Third Report for CRC
Optional Protocol (CP) (2010), the Committee on the Rights of the Child recommended the government
to take more comprehensive measures as follows: “The Committee welcomes the efforts of the State
party to combat child pornography and child prostitution. The Committee, however, is concerned that,in view of the prevalence of these offences, preventive measures remain inadequate.” 28 The
government then criminalized even simple possession with an amendment to the law after taking into
28

Committee on the Rights of the Child, “Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 12, paragraph 1 of
the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and childpornography”, para. 26, CRC/C/OPSC/JPN/CO/1, 22 June 2010,
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRC%2fC%2fOPSC%2fJPN%2fCO%2f1&Lan
g=en .

51

consideration the 2010 Committee recommendation. However, the implementation of the law still has
many problems.
Japan ratified the Convention on Cybercrime in July 2012, and the convention is effective domestically.
Based on Article 9(1) of the Convention on Cybercrime, the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography
Prohibition Act criminalizes the supply of electronic records with child pornographic contents on
platforms such as the Internet. However, upon ratification of the treaty, the Japanese government
declared that only pornographic contents depicting a child’s body (including pornographic contents
confirmed to be depicting an actual child’s body) are considered child pornography under this treaty(see Article 9). As such, they are withholding application of any provision under Article 9 which
contradicts their definition of child pornography. Thus, the restriction on pornography regarding “aperson appearing to be a minor who engages in sexually explicit conduct”, which is regarded as childpornography under the treaty, has not been considered for adoption. Many such products are therefore
still being sold at stores and are prevalent on the Internet.
In 2015, the UN Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, Maud de BoerBuquicchio, visited Japan to investigate and submitted a report to the UN Human Rights Council in
March 2016. In this report, while the Special Rapporteur spoke highly of the Japanese government’s
efforts to date, she also expressed significant concern regarding the sexual exploitation of children andchild pornography and recommended the government to: (1) take a comprehensive approach to deal
with the issue, (2) implement existing law and policy, (3) strengthen efforts to punish any illegal activity,(4) provide training for investigating authorities, (5) cooperate with the related civil business sector, and(6) reinforce efforts for child education.
Additionally, in March 2016, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
recommended the following regarding child pornography. 29 (Only the relevant portions are written.)● Effectively implement existing legal measures and monitor programmes in order to regulate
the production and distribution of pornographic material … that exacerbate discriminatory
gender stereotypes and reinforce sexual violence against women and girls (Para. 21(b));● Intensify monitoring and inspection programmes targeting establishments that provide adultentertainment and produce pornographic film, in order to prevent sexual exploitation (Para.
27(b)).
(1) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights 30
Among international human rights standards, the responsibility to respect human rights within thebusiness sector is provided in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the so-called Ruggie
29

Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, “Concluding observations on the combined seventh andeighth periodic reports of Japan”, CEDAW /C/JPN/CO/7-8, 7 Mar. 2016,
http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/JPN/CEDAW_C_JPN_CO_7-8_21666_E.pdf
30
UN Human Rights Council, Protect, respect and remedy : a framework for business and human rights : report of the Special
Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other BusinessEnterprises, John Ruggie, 7 April 2008, A/HRC/8/5, available at: http://www.refworld.org/docid/484d2d5f2.html

52

Principles. Under these principles, business enterprises have an obligation to prevent or mitigate humanrights violations that are not only caused by the enterprise itself but also violations linked to theiroperations (Principle 13). Such responsibility applies to all enterprises (Principle 14). Child pornography
in Japan is considered a violation of children’s human rights in a supply chain from producers to
distributors. Therefore, each and every enterprise involved in the creation and spread of childpornography has a responsibility to prevent, mitigate, and account for such violations under the Ruggie
Principles. All of the related enterprises in the supply chain should make efforts to prevent any humanrights violation.
i. Principle 13
The responsibility to respect human rights requires that business enterprises:(a) Avoid causing or contributing to adverse human rights impacts through their own activities, andaddress such impacts when they occur;(b) Seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to theiroperations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed tothose impacts.

3. Examples from abroad(1) The United States
The criminal responsibility for the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography is provided in
Sections 2251 to 2260 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 US Code Sec. 2251-2260). Child
pornography is defined as follows.
Section 2256
(8) “child pornography” means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, orcomputer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic,
mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where—(A) The production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit
conduct;(B) Such visual depiction is a digital image, computer image, or computer-generated image that is, or is
indistinguishable from, that of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or(C) Such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is
engaging in sexually explicit conduct.

53

Activities that are punishable by penalty are as follows.
a. The intentional delivery, transportation, receipt, distribution, duplication for the purpose of
distribution, selling, or possession for the purpose of sale, of child pornography.
b. To intentionally possess child pornography (simple possession).
c. To create any obscene visual depiction of explicit sexual activity of a child under the age of 18,
or advertise, promote or distribute the visual depiction of such activity conducted by an existingchild under 18.
d. To provide children under the age of 18 with the visual depiction which is or appears to be of
explicit sexual activity conducted by children under 18 in order to encourage their participationin the illegal activity.
The punishment for (a), (c) or (d) is a fine and 5 to 20 years imprisonment, and the punishment for (b) isa fine, 10 or fewer years of imprisonment, or both. 18 US Code Sec. 2257 provides for the record
keeping requirement. The provision states that all persons involved in the production, editing,
distribution or any other part of the process of pornographic products must keep the IDs of all of theactors. This applies to any products that include explicit sexual activities in its content. As such, the U.S.
obligates all related persons to keep age verification documents of their performers. It is in this way that
the U.S. attempts to eliminate any activity sexually exploiting children in the porn industry.
Further, under Section 2258A of the US Code, any person engaged in providing an electronic
communication service or a remote computing service has the obligation to report child pornography toa specified NPO. (They are required to provide personal information—e.g., an e-mail address and IP
address—access history information of the service provider, picture, or video of the child pornographic
contents, and other information such as these.) Under this system, a fine will be imposed on a person
who intentionally fails to report.
(2) The European Union
As measures against the sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, the European Council
passed Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA in December 2003, and the decision came into effectin 2004. Under Section 1 thereof, child pornography is defined to include sexually explicit conduct of not
only a child but also a person appearing to be a child. Furthermore, Directive 2011/92/EU of theEuropean Parliament and the Council on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children
and child pornography was promulgated and came into effect in December 2011. Each member country
was required to harmonize its domestic law in correspondence with this decision by 18 December 2013.
Under the EU Directive, child pornography is defined as follows.
1. Any material that visually depicts a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct;
2. Any depiction of the sexual organs of a child for primarily sexual purposes;
3. Any material that visually depicts any person appearing to be a child engaged in real or
simulated sexually explicit conduct or any depiction of the sexual organs of any person
appearing to be a child, for primarily sexual purposes; or54

4. Realistic images of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct or realistic images of the sexualorgans of a child, for primarily sexual purposes.
Soliciting, recruiting, or forcing a child to participate in child pornography is severely punished, and the
production, supply, distribution, delivery, sale, purchase, access, and possession, etc., of such are also
punished. In response to this EU Directive, each member country is carrying out the development of its
domestic law based on the Directive.

55

Chapter 8: Conclusion
The investigation carried out by HRN found that child pornography, or pictures or videos which aresuspected to be child pornography, are openly and commercially produced, distributed, sold, anddelivered, and that the regulation and investigation of child pornography have not been thoroughly
carried out. The reasons are as follows:
1. There is a lack of police investigations due to the uncertain age of performers making it difficult
to confirm them being “children”.
2. The monitoring system is inadequate at the review, distribution, and sales stages.
3. There is insufficient investigation and actual monitoring of material categorized under Art.
2.3(iii) due to limited social recognition of the category.
With respect to the pictures and videos produced, distributed, sold, or delivered for commercial
purposes, it is necessary to establish a clear set of rules and a review/monitoring system. This will go far
in creating a situation where the production and distribution of child pornography is halted. It is equallynecessary to have measures which protect children’s rights and public welfare to prevent children frombeing involved in child pornography.
Under the current law, a performer being below eighteen years of age is a prerequisite for criminalizing
a product as child pornography. However, in the current situation where investigations are not carriedout due to the difficulty in verifying the ages of performers, the legal standards are not being effectively
implemented. This situation jeopardizes children and should not be permitted to continue.
Therefore, an effective code of conduct regarding pornographic products needs to be established inJapan. Firstly, a system should be created whereby all products are screened by review associations
before their sale, distribution, and transmission, and age verification is conducted at all stages including
review, distribution, sales, and transmission. Also, following the example set by the U.S. legal standard,
records containing official documents indicating performers’ names, identities, and ages should be kept.
Furthermore, police should thoroughly conduct monitoring, age verification, and investigations forpornographic content in which it is uncertain whether the performers are 18 years old or older (e.g.,pornographic products with advertisements indicating that “the performer is a child” or “the performer
appears to be a child”).
This investigation confirms that many pornographic products advertised as “child pornography” orhaving casted a “performer under the age of 18” are widely sold. Even if some of these products castperformers over the age of 18, the dissemination and prevalence of pornographic products withperformers who appear to be children creates great ambiguity in child pornography regulations,significantly obstructing the complete restriction of actual child pornography. It is also of concern that
contents which clearly depict criminal acts against or sexual exploitation of children may promote or
encourage actual cases of sexual offences and sexual abuse against girls.

56

As mentioned above, under international and EU standards, restrictions and penalties for pornographic
contents include those where a performer “appears to be a child”. Japan should also discuss whether itis really acceptable to allow such pornographic contents where a performer “appears to be a child” tobe left as they are. There is a strong concern that the expansion of such regulations on videos will only
have negative effects. Therefore, we are calling for the industry and related industries to push for selfregulations which also prohibit pornography in which the performer’s age (above or below 18 years old)
is unclear and cannot be confirmed. Such regulations could, for example, regulate videos which
advertise themselves as having, e.g., “child performers” or “performers who look like children”.
The investigation also found that chakuero products are still being widely sold. This is a serious
infringement of children’s rights and the government of Japan should clarify that material falling under
Art. 2.3(iii) is also child pornography. And at the same time, it should involve related business operators
and advance an aggressive policy of investigation and arrests. Further, the producers, review
associations, and any business operators involved in the distribution, sales, and online transmission
should fundamentally revise their recognition of the issue. Regardless of whether a product is chakuero,“image video”, or any other category, they should not produce any pornography containing a performer
under the age of 18, including item (iii) pornography. They are also required to block the distribution,
sale, and transmission of such products and to commit to eliminate child pornography.
1. Measures to protect children
The scope of this research was too limited to address situations of vulnerable children lured into thechakuero industry. However, considering the prevalence of this material, it is suspected certain
producers scout young girls for these roles in a professional manner.
HRN previously investigated and published a report in March 2016 regarding cases of forcibly soliciting
performers for adult videos. Among the cases examined, there were some cases where a bikini model
was initially recruited as a minor, induced into moving from bikini modeling into chakuero, and finallyended up being forced into performing in an adult video with no choice. In this case, compensation forthe minor’s performance has not been paid at all. This is an example of sexual exploitation of children.
Since 2015 there have been court decisions regarding litigation on “penalty charges” (for breaches of
employment contracts) leveled by entertainment or AV management companies against protesting
performers. These decisions found that AV performers’ contracts operated “similarly to employment
contracts”, which must consider the age and experience, etc., of the performer. Thus, a contract
between a child under the age of 18 and a management company is deemed to be similar to an
employment contract without any exception, and it is reasonable to assume that employment related
regulations must apply to these contracts. In this regard, the Labor Standards Act prohibits employmentof a child until 31 March after a child turns 15 years old. A child can still work for a movie/theatrecompany even if the child is under the age of 15; however, it must be a job that is not harmful for thehealth and welfare of the child, and the approval of relevant authorities are required (Article 56 of thelaw). Further requirements include a certificate of family registration for children under the age of 18, a57

certificate indicating that the child’s school president certifies that the job does not affect the educationof the child, and consent from his or her parents, all of which must be kept at the management office(Article 57 of the law). The payment of salary and other appropriate labour standards must be ensured(the Labour Standards Act), and the child is not allowed to work at a hazardous workplace (the Worker
Dispatch Law). Additionally, the Child Welfare Act prohibits anyone from “making a child conduct sexual
activity” and “controlling a child for the purpose of making the child conduct an action harmful to themind and body of the child” (Article 34, Paragraph 1, Items 5 and 9), and it imposes penalties forviolators.
Considering the current situation in which chakuero is prevailing, it is unlikely that the relevant
authorities have conducted appropriate monitoring or investigations of whether these production
companies, to which children under age 18 may belong, comply with the Penal Law (prohibiting sexual
conduct), the Child Prostitution and Child Pornography Prohibition Act, the Child Welfare Act, and theLabor Act (especially Article 56 and thereafter of the Labor Standards Act regarding the use of minors),
or whether or not they have sexually exploited the children in question. An effective monitoring andsupervision system for the protection of children’s human rights is necessary to ensure that the
production companies, to which children belong as “talent” or models, do not violate the Penal Law,
child pornography restrictions, the Child Welfare Act, and labour related laws. We believe it is necessary
to develop the laws and to improve the operation of current laws so that each relevant authority
establishes an effective supervision system and the infringement of children’s rights, such as the
exploitation of children, can be avoided.

58

59

CHAPTER 9: Recommendations
Based on the results of the investigations and considerations above, Human Rights Now issues thefollowing recommendations:
1. To the Government of Japan (the Cabinet Office and relevant cabinet ministers):● Investigate (a) the reality of production, sales, circulation, and delivery of child pornography, (b) the
background of children who get involved in child pornography, and (c) relevant industries andharmful practices, and take necessary steps to prevent such production, circulation and harm.
● Consider effective supervision methods and legal regulations so that the production agencies that
employ children under the age of eighteen actively work to protect children and employees.
● Actively communicate that pornographic material falling under Article 2.3(iii) amounts to childpornography and make its eradication an important mission to all government ministries,
municipalities, public institutions, relevant industries, and the community at large
2. To the Metropolitan Police Department:● Designate the elimination of child pornography as a priority; allocate necessary financial resources
and manpower to it; and establish a zero-tolerance policy for child pornography.
● Confirm the age of performers through supply chains and actively follow up on cases where the ageof the performers is not confirmed.
● Inform all police stations that pornographic material falling under article 2.3(iii) amounts to childpornography. Furthermore, members of the police force should see this issue as a priority androutinely conduct search and follow up activities at retail stores in their neighborhoods.
● Strengthen its search capability, develop and educate human resources, ensure necessary
manpower at each police station, and strengthen existing regulations.
3. To Government Institutions and lawmakers, consider the following proposals:● Obligate all parties who manufacture, edit, circulate, screen, sell, or deliver pornography to holdrecords to confirm the age of all performers and prosecute parties who fail to comply.
● Obligate providers to inform the police of pornographic material featuring children if they encounterany.
4 .To Industry Stakeholders:● Adopt a zero-tolerance policy for child pornography despite the public opinion of genres likechakuero.
● Adopt a zero-tolerance policy for the production, circulation, sale, delivery, and rental service ofpornographic material featuring children, including but not limited to material falling under Art.
2.3(iii).
● Check performers’ name, identity, and age by official documents (ID) in all stages of the
production process, including but not limited to production, screening, circulation, delivery, sale,and rental of the material.
60

●
●
●
●
●
●
●

Announce a uniform and tightened review standard applicable to all products in line withcurrent and applicable legal standards.
Confirm performers’ age in the review phase by using official documents.
Strictly prohibit child pornography including but not limited to pornographic materials fallingunder Art. 2.3(iii).
Introduce self-regulation measures for products which allude to being child pornography.
Collect and discard products which fail to pass the new standards in reviews.
No longer sell, circulate, sell online, or deliver products that fail to pass a review.
Establish and carry out guidelines which prohibit retail and online stores which feature childpornography or products suspected as child pornography from handling such products.

5. To review associations:● Do not pass any pornography featuring a performer under the age of eighteen, regardless ofwhether it is chakuero, and inform the public of this practice.
● Establish clear and unified review standards and processes as review associations, to eliminate
child pornography, achieve accountability by publishing them to the society, and establish asystem where all products should be reviewed.
● In order to comply with the Child Pornography Act, the standards and processes for the review
must include the following matters.
● Implement an age review in the review process, and do not pass a product under the review
unless the review association confirms that performers are 18 years old or older by IDs and age
confirmation materials. Fail a product under review if there is no ID to prove a performer’s age isover eighteen years of age.
● Do not pass any products which are suspected as falling under Art. 2.3(iii) under the review.
● Clarify the review standards for products which are suspected as child pornography and do notpass the following products under the review:o Any products where a child has sexual intercourse with an adult, or a child is sexuallyassaulted, sexually abused, or sexually harassed regardless of the age of the performer;
o Any products that are suspected as child pornography, regardless of the age of theperformer;
o Any products advertising or stating that the performer is an elementary school student or
junior high school student or is under the age of 18;
o Any products advertised as “child pornography” or chakuero;o Any products suggestive of child pornography from the costumes or accessories in the video
to personal belongings or the setting, etc.
● Re-screen all of the products previously passed under former review standards in order toensure that products violating new standards are not distributed, sold, or delivered.
Immediately stop selling, distributing, lending, or collecting and discard those products that do
not pass the new review; and make sure everyone is informed of this practice.

61

6. To sales stores, wholesalers, and rental shops:● Confirm a policy not to sell, distribute, or lend, or handle child pornography including
material categorized under Art. 2.3(iii)● Check in advance and to keep copies of the public documents showing the name and age ofthe performers of all products in which a child under the age of 18 may perform.
● Do not sell at stores, do not lend, and do not distribute through wholesalers the products
which have not been passed under strict review.
7. To Pornographic Websites:● Adopt a strict policy on child pornography and actively check the ages of performers, including
materials falling under Art. 2.3(iii).
● Take all necessary steps to prevent users from watching child pornography, including but notlimited to blocking and deletion of user accounts and streaming websites.

62Addendum
Supplemental information(9 September 2016)

1.

With respect to video (a) “Thirteen junior sch■l students – Show all special!!” mentioned in
Chapter 4 of this report, the relevant footnote states that “The product was also sold on theInternet. According to information we received, the manufacturer was First Star.” After the
preparation of this report, however, First Star declared on their website that there is no productinvolving performers under the age of 18. (Source: http://www.first-star.co.jp/)

2.

With respect to video (g) “■■ who is 139 centimeters tall, is a junior high sch■l student”
mentioned in Chapter 4 of this report, IPPA declared that this product is an AV product depicting“lolita” in their statement dated 8 September 2016. (Source: http://www.ippa.jp/pdf/ippajidoung20160908-2.pdf)

3.

Chapter 5 Part 1 and Chapter 6 Part 3.3 of this report state that MANIAC is a member of JVPS
and that Zeus is the member of IPPA. We based these descriptions on the confirmation of IPPA
and IPPA’s response that they are members in this way. In IPPA’s statement dated 8 September
2016, however, IPPA denied that MANIAC is the member of JVPS and that Zeus is the member of
IPPA. (Source: http://www.ippa.jp/pdf/ippa-jidoung20160908-2.pdf)

63