JFM Green Bond
Impact Report 2023

Disclaimer
By reading these materials, you agree to be bound by the following limitations:
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy,completeness or correctness of the information, or opinions contained herein. Neither JFM nor any of its advisors or
representatives shall have any responsibility or liability whatsoever (for negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arisingfrom any use of these materials or their contents or otherwise arising in connection with these materials. The information set out
herein may be subject to updating, completion, revision, verification and amendment and such information may change materially.
These materials are based on the economic, regulatory, market and other conditions as in effect on the date hereof. It should beunderstood that subsequent developments may affect the information contained in these materials, which neither JFM nor its
advisors or representatives are under an obligation to update, revise or affirm.
Forward-looking statements, including JFM’s plans in these materials, are based on information available to JFM at the time they
were prepared and involve potential risks and uncertainties. Actual results, therefore, may differ from those described in thesematerials due to changes in a variety of factors, such as market trends, economic conditions and regulations. Accordingly,
investors are advised to use their own discretion and exercise great caution when making investment decisions.
These materials and the information contained herein do not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of orsolicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities of JFM. Securities of JFM not registered under the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to U.S.
persons absent registration under or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the United States securities
laws. These materials and the information contained herein are being furnished to you solely for your information and may not be
reproduced or redistributed to any other person, in whole or in part. In particular, neither the information contained in thesematerials nor any copy hereof may be, directly or indirectly, taken or transmitted into or distributed in the United States, Canada,
Australia, Japan, Hong Kong or any other jurisdiction which prohibits the same except in compliance with applicable securities
laws. Any failure to comply with this restriction may constitute a violation of U.S. or other national securities laws. No money,
securities or other consideration is being solicited, and, if sent in response to this presentation or the information contained herein,
will not be accepted.

1

Table of Contents

About This Report… P 3

Executive Summary… P 4

JFM and Sewerage… P 5

JFM SDGs Related Lending Operations… P 6

JFM Green Bond Framework… P 7

Reporting… P 8 - 42

( i ) Amount of Loan to Sewerage Projects… P 8( ii ) Breakdown of Green Bond Effective Portfolio… P 9( iii ) Project by Project Reporting… P 10( iv ) Case Study… P 392

About This Report
JFM’s Loan Portfolio by Project TypeJapan Finance Organization for Municipalities (JFM) provides loans toprojects operated by local governments. As of 31 March 2023, total
outstanding loans stood JPY 23.3tn, of which JPY 6.6tn was for sewerage,
accounting for 28.5% of the total amount.

Industrial Water Supply Others 10.4%
0.6%
Proper Management of
Public Facilities 1.7%
Local Road Development
2.0%
Public Projects 2.2%
SewerageTransportation
28.5%
3.1%
Disaster Management
and Mitigation 3.6%
Temporary
Financial
Special Municipal
Water
Countermeasures
Mergers 4.7%
SupplyFunding
12.8%
Hospitals
25.6%
5.0%

JFM issued its fourth green bond in February 2023 to finance the Japanese
local governments’ sewerage projects and fully allocated the net proceeds by
30 March 2023 after issuance. Sustainability Working Group establishedunder JFM Sustainability Committee chaired by President and CEO
conducted a survey to 74 local governments where loans were madebetween 27 February 2023 and 30 March 2023 and of which the loan amountfor the project was JPY 300mm or higher in principle and obtained effective
response from 71 local governments (Total loan amount: approx. JPY 95bn,
effective response rate: 96%).
In this report, JFM put together an overview of each sewerage project which
JFM financed and its environmental impacts including impact indicators
based on the response in the survey. The objective of this report is to actively
disclose to investors the Japanese local governments’ efforts on SDGs andthe environmental impact of each project.

※As of 31 March 2023
※Does not add up to 100
due to rounding off

The amount and number of JFM loans made for sewerage projects
4,000

Amount ofelectricity
saved (kWh)3,000

Amount(JPY 100mm)

2,000

Number of projects

1,000※The above loan amountincludes refinancing for
sewerage projects
2022 (FY)

0
2018

2019

7.3

2020

2021

Volume oftreated water
(m3)

mm

Population of
the treated area
(thousand)Total extension ofpipes (km)25,293

340.5
3

2.9

bn

※The above data is calculated based on the survey※Amount of electricity saved and volume of treated water are annual figures

Executive Summary◼ The breakdown of loans to sewerage projects provided by JFM is as◼ JFM provides loans to local governments on SDGs-related projects.

Sewerage projects take up a large portion of JFM’s total lending, whichreaches about JPY 300 ~ 400bn annually.

follows:
Loan Amount by Project Type※1◼ On the back of the growing global concerns on SDGs, JFM issued EUR

500mm (approx. JPY 71.1bn) green bond in February 2023, in order topromote actively the Japanese local governments’ efforts on SDGs andto secure stable provision of long-term funding at low interest rates.

Others13,941.5
15%

Sewerage
Treatment Plant
10,335.9
11%◼ JFM’s green bond has received a second-party opinion from Moody’s andhas attained an SQS2 sustainability quality score (very good).
Pipes
58,131.2
61%

Loan Amount by Borrower Type ※2(JPYmm)Advanced
Treatment Plant
464.1
0.5%
SludgeTreatment
Plant
4,973.4
5%

Pump Station
7,463.9
8%

OthersTowns and 1,941.9
Villages
1%
22,494.7
9%(JPYmm)Prefectures
1,047.6
Government0.4%
designated
Cities6,654.1
3%

Cities217,672.5
87%

Summary of Terms - Green Bond
※1 Breakdown of green bond eligible projects from 27 February 2023 to 30 March 2023 (approx. JPY 95bn)※2 Breakdown of loans for sewerage projects in FY2022※3 Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

Bond Ratings

A1 / A+ (Moody’s / S&P)

Tenor

5 yearIssue Amount

EUR 500 million

Pricing Date

15 February 2023

order to measure the environmental impacts of their sewerage projects.
Loans from 27 February to 30 March 2023 were targeted for the survey,
and the refinancing rate for sewerage projects was 0%. In addition, thefollowing effects were observed:

Issue Date

22 February 2023

Summary of Survey Results

Maturity Date

22 February 2028

Coupon3.375%

Second-party Opinion Provider

Moody’s

Sustainability Quality Score

SQS2(Very good)◼ JFM has conducted surveys to relevant local government borrowers in

Total extension of pipes(km)

Covered area
Population

Water management
Capacity (㎥)Amount ofelectricity saved (kWh)340.5

25,293,694

2,999,187,751

7,329,619※The number of the survey sample for local governments was 74, and 71 returned effective
response (96%)※Summary Methodology
1) Total extension of pipes is addition of new constructed pipes2) Covered area population is calculated by totaling the population (actual, planned, or estimatedvalues) of the covered areas after new construction or renewal/reconstruction of sewage
treatment facilities, etc.
3) Water management capacity is calculated by totaling the annual volume (actual, planned, or
estimated values) of treated water after new construction or renewal/reconstruction of sewage
treatment facilities, etc.
4) Amount of electricity saved is calculated by totaling the reduction amount (actual, planned, or
estimated values) in annual electricity consumption before and after new construction or
renewal/reconstruction of sewage treatment facilities, etc.

4

JFM and Sewerage
JFM was established as a joint funding organization wholly owned by all
Japanese local governments and has provided long-term and low-interestrate loans to local governments. JFM has supported local governments’finance in the capital markets and has contributed to their sound financial
management and promoted the welfare of their residents.

Japan Finance Organization for Municipalities
President and CEO
SATO Fumitoshi

Local governments, amidst a decrease in population, are facing various
administrative demand, such as the revitalization of regions, measuresagainst the declining birth rate and an aging population, deteriorating
infrastructure, measures against large-scale and intensifying natural
disasters.
To address these challenges, JFM has provided loans to local
governments who develop infrastructure and administrative services totheir residents and has contributed to sustainable development of thecommunity and environment.
Sewerage, which covers the largest portion of JFM’s loan portfolio, is managed by local governments and the quality of water isregulated under the laws of Japan. Sewerage plays an important role and contributes to the improvement of living conditions,prevention of floods and preservation of water quality through wastewater treatment and rain water drainage. The national
government and the local governments have worked together to create a sustainable sewerage system such as measures against
aging facilities and minimizing the effect of national disasters and JFM contributes to a sustainable development of the system byproviding loans to local governments.
The Japanese government has set specific targets on sewerage business based on the Paris Agreement, by setting
environmental measures such as sludge recycle rate. Moreover, in accordance with the Act on Promoting of Global WarmingCountermeasures and its related policies, Japan has set a policy goal of achieving the utilization rate of sewage sludge as energy
such as biomass power generation.

5

JFM SDGs Related Lending Operations
Sewerage

Water Supply andIndustrial Water Supply

Transportation

Purification Center

Water Supply Plant

Tramway

Hospitals andElderly Care Services

Disaster Management
and Mitigation

Hospital

Tsunami Evacuation Tower

6

JFM Green Bond Framework

December 2022

Approach to Sustainability

Alignment with the Green Bond Principles, 2021 (GBP)◼ Local Governance in Japan and JFM’s contribution◼ JFM’s Green Bond Framework is aligned with four core

＊SDGs Mapping-Fund Usage by JFM, 29.2% (As of 31 March 2022) arefinanced for Sewerage projects

components of the GBP

1 Use of Proceeds◼ Development of Sewerage System in Japan◼ An amount equal to the net proceeds will be allocated to the＊Sewerage business is operated by municipalities and quality of water isregulated under laws of Japan

Eligible Green Projects set forth below◼ Further initiatives and towards achievement of SDGs

2 Process for Project Evaluation and Selection◼ JFM Loan Department will confirm that the borrower has

Rationale for Issuanceobtained consent or approval on the borrowing from relevant
authorities◼ Sewerage industry can contribute to a sustainable economy andpublic health◼ Green Bond Working Group will conduct a survey tomunicipalities to determine the effective portfolio◼ JFM hopes to broaden its investor base by attracting green bondinvestors

3 Management of Proceeds◼ JFM Green Bond Working Group will track, monitor andEligibility Criteria

account for the allocation of the proceeds◼ Eligibility Criteria for JFM green bond is as set forth on the table

4 Reportingbelow◼ JFM Green Bond Working Group will conduct a survey of

GBP Eligible
Green Project
Category

Sustainable
water andwastewater
management

Eligibility Criteria

Development, construction,
maintenance, updates, operation ofsewerage related assets, which
comply with sewage drainage
standards set by Japanese law
including:◼

Sewerage Management-Related
Facilities◼

Facility/Equipment

◼

Pipes

Environmental
Objective

municipal borrowers with respect to the environmental impactsof sewerage projects

Alignmentwith UNSDGs◼ JFM Green Bond Working Group will then report the effective

portfolio for the allocation which only includes projects thatborrowers return effective response

Pollution
Prevention andControl◼ JFM will publish the following impact report on website annually

Water Resource
Conservation

Amount of net proceeds of the Notes allocated◼ Breakdown of Effective Portfolio◼ Expected or estimated KPIs
◼ Case studies of JFM’s lending to sewerage projects◼ Refinancing rate◼

Energy use of
sewage sludge,
sewage sludge
recycle7

(i) Amount of Loan to Sewerage Projects
Government
Prefectures -designated
CitiesCitiesTowns andVillages

Others

Total

Number of Local
Governments

8

7

463

273

7

758

Number of Loans

12

15

1,771

659

20

2,477

Loan Amount(JPY million)

1,047.6

6,654.1

217,672.5

22,494.7

1,941.9

249,810.8

JPY
2bn oroverJPY
1bn orover

JPY
500mm orover

JPY
100mm or
over

Below
JPY
100mm

Total

3

26

78

486

1,884

2,477

Number of Loans
by Loan Amount

Number of Local Governments
by Borrower Type
Prefectures
Government8
designated1%
Cities7
1%

Others
7
1%
Towns
and
Villages
273
36%

Cities463
61%

Loan Amount by Borrower Type◼ The total loan amount to sewerage projects for FY2022 (1 April 2022 to 31 March 2023)(excluding refinancing) was JPY 249.8bn.
◼ The number of local governments was 758, and the number of loans was 2,477. In terms of theloan amount by types of borrowers, cities were the highest with 87%, followed by towns andvillages with 9%, then government-designated cities with 3%.

Towns andVillages
22,494.7
9%

Others1,941.9
1%◼ In terms of the number of loans by loan amount, JPY 2bn or over was 3, JPY 1bn or over was

26, JPY 500mm or over was 78, JPY 100mm or over was 486 and below JPY 100mm was
1,884.

Cities217,672.5
87%※ Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

8(JPYmm)Prefectures
1,047.6
0.4%
Governmentdesignated
Cities6,654.1
3%

(ii) Breakdown of Green Bond Effective Portfolio
Sewerage
Treatment
Plant

Advanced
Treatment Plant

Sludge Treatment
Plant

Pump
Station

Pipes

Others

Total

Number of Projects
by Type

54

3

20

53

148

70

348

Loan Amount by
Type(JPY million)

10,335.9

464.1

4,973.4

7,463.9

58,131.2

13,941.5

95,310.0

Loan Amount by Project TypeNew

Renewal

Total

Number of Projects
by Type

156

192

348

Loan Amount by
Type(JPY million)

57,103.1

38,206.9

95,310.0

Advanced Treatment Plant
464.1
0.5%

Sewerage Treatment Plant
10,335.9
11%
Others13,941.5
15%

Sludge Treatment
Plant
4,973.4
5%

Pipes
58,131.2
61%◼ JFM Sustainability Working Group has selected 74 local governments

which JFM financed for eligible sewerage projects between 27 February
2023 and 30 March 2023 with the loan amount over JPY 300mm inprinciple and conducted a survey for the purpose of this green bondreporting. The working group obtained effective response from 71 local
governments (effective response rate:96%) and a total of approx. JPY 95
bn in loan amount.

(JPYmm)Pump Station
7,463.98%※ Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

New/Renewal percentage(JPYmm)◼ The table above shows the survey results from relevant local governments.
◼ Regarding the types of projects by loan amount eligible for green bond,pipes cover the largest portion with 61%, followed by sewerage treatment
plants with 11%, and then pump stations with 8%.
◼ Additionally, 60% of the loan amount eligible for green bond was financed

to new facilities and 40% was for renewal.
9

Renewal38,206.9
40%

New
57,103.1
60%

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sewerage Treatment Plant 1
Sewerage Treatment Plant (New)

Borrowing
EntityWater
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Prefecture

Project Description

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

Installation of additional facilities in linewith the increase in population within thetreated areas

251,377

130,500

51.91

493,032

Toyama City

ToyamaInstallation of automatic water samplingmachines at Hamakurosaki Purification
Center to check water quality during water
treatment

36,985

15,664

42.35

Nagano City

NaganoConstruction of septic tanks

14,762

8,400

56.90

18,000

9,000

50.00

Other positive environmental impact

Sludge recycling rate 100% (Delivery torecycling plants, composting companies
and cement companies)◼ Annual electricity consumption
19,310,107kWh → 19,014,469kWh◼ Use of heat generated during seweragetreatment for the air conditioning facilities
in Water and Sewer Bureau officebuildings◼ Installation of purification tanks will help
increase the population connected to
sewerage system◼

HatsukaichiCity（1）
HatsukaichiCity（2）
HatsukaichiCity（3）Hiroshima

Iwakuni City Yamaguchi

91,192,377

3.2
→1.75

1.55

240,276

39,494,100

4.0

1.0

2,341

142,809

N/A

N/A

58,0325,441,599

6.9

0.9

197,000

88,60044.97

Expansion of sewerage treatment facilities
at Ohno Purification Center

93,29041,95044.97

15,3681,392,113

3.1

1.1

Improving public health and preserving
water quality in public waters by
responding to the increase in treatedwater volume in line with the expansion oftreated areas

Installation of septic tanks

4,143

1,200

28.96

1,639

789

N/A

N/A

N/A

Expansion of sewerage treatment facilities
at Hatsukaichi Purification Center

NagasakiCity

Nagasaki

Development of the second basin for the
primary sludge thickener facilities atNanbu Purification Center and renovationof fittings of the in-house power
generation room at Seibu Purification
CenterUsa City

Oita

Construction of a new treatment plant anddevelopment of sewerage systems in linewith the expansion of treated area, etc.

Total Amount of Sewerage Treatment Plant (New) (9 projects)◼

102,292

57,026

55.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1,600,137

927,100

57.94

21,2882,427,060

23.6
→20.3

13.4

2,317,986

1,279,440※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

10◼

Improvement in sludge treatment
efficiency and expected reduction ofelectricity consumption by using new
facilities and equipment◼

Improvement in public health byincreasing appropriate sewage water
treatment volume in line with the
expansion of treated areas

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sewerage Treatment Plant 2
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Chitose City

Hokkaido

Hachinohe
City

Aomori

Project Description

Construction of mechanical equipmentof the No. 2 blower and electricalinstrumentation equipment, etc. due toaging of facilities
Renewal of aging hypochlorous acid *storage tanks*Disinfection for discharge of sewage
water treated at Chitose City
Purification Center into rivers
Mechanical works for renovating thescreen sludge facilities at terminal
sewerage treatment plants and settlingbasin equipment, etc.

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/CoveredManagement(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Area
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost
Population(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)(persons)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

139,80288,30063.16

111,600

24,398,365

7.4

1.0

Reduction of CO2 emissions by introducing
energy-saving equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
4,810,749kWh → 4,772,913kWh

22,00022,000100

95,95059,475

N/A

N/A

◼

Environmental conservation of rivers

1,305,130

653,53050.07

150,690

17,942,633

15.0

N/A

◼

Annual electricity consumption
492,790kWh → 488,701kWh (Estimate)◼

Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting,conversion to fuel)◼ Securing sewerage treatment functions andlifelines in the event of disaster through theconstructions enhancing earthquakeresistance and tsunami-resistance◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting,conversion to fuel)◼ Greenhouse cultivation using waste heatfrom power generation facilities (Heatsupply: ~950,000MJ (A-heavy oil equivalent:~26kL)◼ Digestion gas power generation (Electricity
for 400 households, CO2 emission reduction:~1,500t)◼

TsuruokaCity（1）

Yamagata

16,000

49.46

2,733

365,156

1.3

1.3

387,245

184,400

47.62

74,569

10,116,268

2.1

0.9

442,073

198,900

44.99

1,919,423

1,011,717

52.71

178,800

25,877,770

15.0

0.62
→0.52

902,726

567,730

62.89

189,078

90,00047.60

100,783

7,410,245

1.5

2.59
→2.31

Renovation and renewal of Tsuruoka
Purification Center and one otherfacility

TsuruokaCity（2）

Iwaki City
（1）
Iwaki City
Fukushima（2）
Iwaki City
（3）
Hitachinaka
IbarakiCity32,351

Renovation and renewal of aging
treatment plants

Renewal of electrical facilities atterminal treatment plants, etc.

N/A

Annual electricity consumption
2,469,801kWh → 2,459,176kWh
Improvement in living conditions throughproper sewerage treatment◼ Annual electricity consumption
19,310,107kWh → 19,014,469kWh◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Delivery torecycling plants, composting companies andcement companies)◼

◼

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

Renewal of facilities operated beyond
durable life

776,550

331,000

42.62

493,032

91,192,377

3.2
→1.75

1.55

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity11

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sewerage Treatment Plant 3
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Maebashi
City

Gunma

Chiba City

Chiba

Funabashi
City

Chiba

Project Description

Renewal of Series 3 air diffusers at
Maebashi Water Purification Center
Execution design for renovating aging
settling basin facilities and boiler facilities
at Nanbu Purification Center of the Nanbu
Treatment Area
Renewal of instrumentation facilities,
rainwater settling basin facilities, andcombined sewage pump electric facilities
for Nishiura Sewerage Treatment Plant

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)
49,58049,580100

66,616

17,616,493

4.0

1.1

25,985

14,459

55.64

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

921,680

414,600

44.98

110,700

19,843,116

2.9
→0.9

0.77
→0.6625

Other positive environmental impact

N/A◼

Securing stable treatment functions by
reducing the risk of failure

N/A

Tokyo

Renewal of aging ultrasonic wave level
meters13,80513,80099.96

97,341

18,000,000

1.8

1.36

Sludge recycling rate 100%(Conversion to cement raw material)(Plan)◼ Annual electricity consumption
7,520,362kWh → 7,500,000kWh (Plan)

Kanagawa

Renovation and renewal of the primary
settling basin sludge collectors, etc. andinstrumentation equipment (measures forlonger useful life)

229,418

153,780

67.03

58,815

9,298,140

4.4

0.91

N/A

◼

Tachikawa
City

Zushi City

Reduction of electricity consumption byintroducing new facilities
Annual electricity consumption
14,004,069kWh → 13,999,740kWh◼ Use of heat generated during seweragetreatment for the air conditioning facilities
in Water and Sewer Bureau officebuilding◼

◼

ToyamaIntroduction of new facilities associatedwith the renewal of treatment plants

823,347

382,960

46.51

380,585

55,861,141

4.0

2.0
→1.0

Fukui

Renewal of mixing aeration equipment for
Shimizu Seibu Environmental Center, andair conditioning facilities for Shimizu Tobu
Environmental Center and Takasu
Purification Center, etc.

194,868

106,84854.83

230,791

57,406

3.1
→2.2

1.2

Construction of deodorization facilities

408,711167,100

40.88

144,328

19,540,248

4.4

9.4
→6.3

Nagano City
（2）

Construction of electrical facilities andwater treatment facilities at ShinshuShinmachi Purification Center

29,00013,500

46.55

1,437

147,362

1.9
→1.8

1.4

Matsumoto
City

Seismic reinforcement works for sludge
treatment buildings (underground),chlorine mixing basin and discharge
culvert at Ryoshima Purification Center

9,813,552

3.7
→2.5

Toyama City

Fukui City

Nagano City
（1）
NaganoNagano◼
◼

Annual electricity consumption
9,002,462kWh → 8,724,744kWh(Estimate)◼ Improvement in energy efficiency bydeveloping energy-saving new facilities◼ Annual electricity consumption
105,052kWh →103,163kWh (Estimate)◼

Securing stable sewerage treatment
through the seismic reinforcement works◼ Annual electricity consumption
3,776,928kWh → 3,611,664kWh(Estimate)◼

35,00014,10040.29

75,326

0.6※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

12

Improvement in water quality
Annual electricity consumption
714,778kWh → 675,310kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sewerage Treatment Plant 4
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityGifu City（1）Gifu City（2）Nabari City
Uji City

Prefecture

Gifu
Mie

Project Description

Renovation of mechanical equipment andelectrical equipment at plants
Renewal of facilities and equipment, etc.

Kyoto

Renewal of digestion tanks at seweragetreatment plants

Osaka

Renewal of rainwater pumping facilities
and monitoring and control facilities,
seismic reinforcing works for pumpstations

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
CoveredAnnual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)
97,16092,30095.00
377,800
44,760,891
6.4
0.6
1,033,125392,700
38.01
24,93024,930100
52,7807,628,500
15.0
2.1

Other positive environmental impact◼

Annual electricity consumption
1,695,715kWh → 1,660,998kWh
N/A

Annual electricity consumption
3,640,144kWh → 3,433,915kWh(Estimate)◼

419,544

197,000

46.96

63,4206,775,399

5.4

1.2

Securing sufficient drainage capacity
Reduction of CO2 emissions byintroducing energy-saving equipment◼ Ensuring reliability as an essential lifeline
for social activities and civic life throughearthquake-resistant measures◼

Kishiwada
City

Himeji City
（1）
Himeji City
（2）
Himeji City
（3）
Himeji City
（4）
Wakayama
City（1）

Hyogo

Renovation of pump electrical facilities
operated beyond durable life

Wakayama
City（2）
Wakayama
City（3）
Wakayama
City（4）

Renewal of aging sewerage treatment
facilities

Wakayama

Renovation of pump facilities operated
beyond durable life◼

566,939

271,400

47.87

247,138

247,106

99.99

862,623

862,615100

593,932

295,900

49.82

739,551

345,42246.71

93,00042,200

45.38

1,779

2,462,930

3.3

0.4
→0.3

478,474

61,146,242

3.8

1.1
→1.0

◼

Prevention of underground contamination
due to leaking of sewage water at thetime of natural disasters such as
earthquake◼ Annual electricity consumption
6,594,200kWh → 6,192,600kWh (Plan)◼

69,06633,50048.50

63,62034,40054.07

75,00034,10045.47

Wakayama
City（5）

Replacement of power receiving andtransforming facilities

36,93033,60090.98

Wakayama
City（6）

Replacement of aging blower’s ancillaryfacilities

6,994

6,400

91.51

Kure City

Renewal of monitoring and control
facilities, etc.at purification centers

20,696

7,020,300

5.6

0.32
→0.23

83,99815,078,000

3.6
→2.1

2.58

◼

388,800

215,10755.33

184,448

22,270,592

15.0

3.0

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

13

Annual electricity consumption
6,275,360kWh → 6,000,480kWh (Plan)

Sludge recycling rate 100%
(Composting, conversion to cement）◼ Annual electricity consumption
17,285,748kWh → 16,605,514kWh◼

Hiroshima

Annual electricity consumption
12,957,180kWh → 12,811,150kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sewerage Treatment Plant 5
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)
Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Tokushima
City

Tokushima

Renewal of aging mechanical equipment
and in-house power generation facilities at
Chuo Purification Center and Hokubu
Purification Center

223,027

102,372

45.90

79,184

18,660,523

8.92

1.2
→1.1

Takamatsu
City

KagawaRenovation of aging facilities

415,348

198,300

47.74

293,420

34,806,674

2.6

0.67

Marugame
City

KagawaConstruction of a new purification center
to replace the aging and non-earthquake
resistant existing purification center

1,169,443

211,275

18.07

42,3007,678,000

13.9

N/A

Ehime

Expansion of facilities at Onishi Water
Treatment Center and Iguchi Purification
Center to respond to the increase intreated water volume, and upgrade offacilities at Kuo agricultural community
drainage treatment plant

281,688

129,760

46.07

8,801

1,096,792

1.91

2.07

Karatsu City

Saga

Renewal to facilities adopting
solubilization devices

815,187

367,51345.08

87,1698,164,370

2.68

1.6895→1.484

Tosu City

Saga

Construction of additional water treatment
facilities at Tosu City Purification Center

480,830

216,900

45.11

73,60638,9003.3

0.9

Renovation of aging air compressors andraw water pump facilities at Miyazaki
Sewerage Treatment Plant

108,649

32,10029.54

162,915

29,592,139

3.6

Imabari City

Other positive environmental impact

Securing stable treatment functions in theevent of disasters◼ Annual electricity consumption
5,846,090kWh → 5,827,746kWh (Plan)◼ Recovery in functions, and reduction of
CO2 emissions by introducing energysaving facilities◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Conversion
to cement, composting)◼ Annual electricity consumption
15,653,847kWh → 15,193,906kWh (Plan)◼ Effectively use of treated water withintreatment plants◼ Reduction of CO emissions by2
downsizing facilities and introducing
energy-saving equipment◼

N/A

Reduction of sludge by reducing moisture
content of dehydrated sludge◼ Increase in electricity output through theincrease in gas generation◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting)◼ Improvement of living conditions throughappropriate sewerage treatment by
expanding the treatment capacity◼

MiyazakiCity（1）

613,098

120,100

19.59

3,889

728,310

2.2

Partial renovation of No.5 main pump andNo. 6 blower at Ohyodo Treatment Center

200,61355,20027.52

151,199

15,009,299

2.8

Total Amount of Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal) (45 projects) 18,474,007

9,056,504

MiyazakiCity（3）Miyazaki

N/A※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

14

Environmental improvement throughstable sewerage treatment

Environmental improvement throughstable sewerage treatment◼ Annual electricity consumption
584,632kWh → 581,077kWh◼ Environmental improvement throughstable sewerage treatment◼

Partial renovation of No.2 and No.3
treated water pumps at Aoshima
Purification Center

MiyazakiCity（2）◼

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Advanced Treatment Plant
Advanced Treatment Plant (New)
Water
Water
Quality
JFM Loan
Quality (BOD)
Covered Annual Water(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/(AfterArea
Management(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
treatment,
Population
Capacitytreatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost
Year/Period(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Toyohashi
City

Aichi

Integration of sewage water treated ataging Noda Sewerage Treatment Plant
into Nakajima Sewerage Treatment Plant

882,628

408,500

Total Amount of Advanced Treatment Plant (New) (1 project)882,628

408,500

46.28

266,121

10,414,860

7.7
→7.0

0.16
→0.14

Other positive environmental impact◼

Annual electricity consumption
11,558,414kWh → 11,521,886kWh

Advanced Treatment Plant (Renewal)
Water
Water
Quality
JFM Loan
Quality (BOD)
Covered Annual Water(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/(AfterArea
Management(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
treatment,
Population
Capacitytreatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost
Year/Period(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Chiba City

Chiba

Renovation of the aging monitoring andcontrol facilities at the advanced
treatment plants at Nanbu Purification
Center in the Nanbu treatment area

97,24048,840

50.23

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Toyohashi
City

Aichi

Reinforcement of building structure oftreatment plants

12,434

6,782

54.54

266,121

10,414,860

7.7
→7.0

0.16
→0.14

109,674

55,622

Total Amount of Advanced Treatment Plant (Renewal) (2 projects)

15

Other positive environmental impact◼

Securing stable advanced treatment
functions by reducing the risk of failure◼

Improvement of seismic performance
Annual electricity consumption
11,558,414kWh → 11,521,886kWh◼

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sludge Treatment Plant 1
Sludge Treatment Plant (New)

Borrowing
EntityWater
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Prefecture

Project Description

Other positive environmental impact

Chiba

Construction works related to the projectof converting sludge into solid fuel at
Matsugashima Terminal Treatment Plant

824,540

824,540

100

78,40012,608,307

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate 100% (Conversion
to solid fuel (Coal alternative) (Plan)◼ Reduction of CO emissions through the2effective use of sewage sludge by
converting into fuelMie

Promotion of a broader area management
by centralizing the treatment of humanwaste/purification tank sludge at Central
Purification Center due to aging of IgaNanbu Purification Center (human waste
treatment plant)

446,470

202,700

45.40

52,7807,628,500

N/A

N/A

N/A

17,000

8,500

50.00

259,000

158,900

61.35

74,00032,00043.24◼

Ichihara City

Nabari City

HatsukaichiCity（1）
HatsukaichiCity（2）
HatsukaichiCity（3）
HatsukaichiCity（4）

Construction of new sludge treatment
facilities (gravitational concentration) at
Ohno Purification Center

Hiroshima
Construction of new sludge treatment
facilities (mechanical/gravitational
concentration) at Hatsukaichi Purification
CenterTotal Amount of Sludge Treatment Plant (New) (6 projects)

Improvement in public health,preservation of water quality in public
waters◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting)(Plan)◼

14,3201,297,180

N/A

N/A

Improvement in public health,preservation of water quality in public
waters◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Conversion
to cement, composting) (Plan)◼

22,0005,000

1,643,010

1,231,640

22.73

62,936

5,901,442※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity16

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sludge Treatment Plant 2
Sludge Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

Sludge recycling rate 84.9% (Conversion to
cement raw material and partial conversion
to fertilizer)◼ Reduction of CO emissions by introducing
2
energy-saving equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
1,749,588kWh → 1,681,820kWh◼ Downsizing taking account of a future
decrease in sludge volume (80t/day to
60t/day) and replacement withsupercharged incinerators reducing CO2
emissions and saving energies◼ Annual electricity consumption
14,181,233kWh → 13,927,152kWh (Plan)◼ Reduction of electricity consumption in theentire incineration system by using sludge
incineration heat (~31.2%)◼ CO emitted during sludge incineration
2(Annual total) 15,979t → 8,235t (Plan)◼ Sludge recycling (Conversion to cement(incineration ash))◼ Use of sewerage treatment water forsnowmelt◼ Use of digestion gas generated from sludge
as auxiliary fuel for incineration◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting)(Plan)◼ Prevention of outbreak of mosquitoes, flies
and infectious diseases, and improvementin the sanitary environment◼

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Renovation of No. 2 centrifugal
dehydrator facilities and electricalfacilities, etc. due to aging of facilities

430,610

328,800

76.36

111,600

130,308

N/A

N/A

Asahikawa
City

Hokkaido

Renovation and renewal of No. 1 sludge
incinerator with bubble-type fluidized
bed furnace due to aging of facilities
and obsolescence in environmental
performance

1,789,879

741,700

41.44

312,600

51,531,342

15.0

N/A

Miho Village

Ibaraki

Additional installation of oxidation ditch
treatment systems

682,910348,100

50.97

12,6691,694,074

1.4
→0.95

3.5
→3.07

Zushi City

Kanagawa

Renovation and renewal ofconcentrated sludge collectors(measures for longer useful life)

1,332,579

825,667

61.96

58,815

9,298,140

4.4

0.91

N/A
◼

Toyama City

ToyamaExecution design for renovating sludge
treatment facilities

33,755

15,18945.00

22,8933,189,600

N/A

N/A

◼

TsubataTown

Ishikawa

Construction of energy-recovery waste
treatment facilities for co-firing ofgeneral waste and sewage sludge

2,048,778

346,100

16.89

34,4783,284,042

9.7

4.1
→2.3

◼

NaganoRenovation and renewal of No. 1 sludge
dehydrator facilities and the powerreceiving and transforming facilities andseismic strengthening work for sludge
treatment buildings at Miyabuchi
Purification Center

177,760

63,50035.72

17125,481

21,125,688

N/A

N/A

Annual electricity consumption
2,752,210kWh → 2,643,780kWh

Stable sewerage treatment through thereconstruction and seismic retrofitting of
aging facilities◼ Sludge recycling rate 98.7% (Use ofdigestion gas for power generation anddehydrated cake as cement raw material)(Plan)◼ Annual electricity consumption
3,090,695kWh → 2,602,464kWh (Estimate)◼

MatsumotoCity

Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting)
Annual electricity consumption
1,636,500kWh → 1,633,920kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Sludge Treatment Plant 3
Sludge Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
AmountTotal Project
Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period(%)
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

Energy saving by adopting simplified
systems◼ Sludge recycling rate 5% (Conversion to
cement, composting)◼ Annual electricity consumption
4,064,000kWh → 3,658,000kWh (Plan)◼ Reduction of CO emissions by shifting2
from sludge incineration to solid fuelconversion and introducing sludge
digestion◼ Annual electricity consumption
126,488kWh → 124,549kWh (Plan)◼ Annual electricity consumption
6,594,200kWh → 6,192,600kWh (Plan)◼

Tokai City

Aichi

Renewal of dust removal facilities andsludge withdrawal valve facilities atpurification centers

103,030

41,72440.50

113,814

9,324,000

2.0

0.4

Fukuchiyama CityKyoto

Reconstruction of Sludge Treatment
Facility

117,420

52,90045.05

64,11018,000,000

N/A

N/A

Wakayama
City

Wakayama

209,220

93,20044.55

20,696

7,020,300

5.6

0.32
→0.23

261,500

117,600

44.97

20,935

5,134,440

N/A

N/A

1,169,443

211,275

18.07
42,300

N/A

N/A

N/A

Iwakuni City Yamaguchi
MarugameCity（1）MarugameCity（2）

KagawaReconstruction of air preheaters operated
beyond durable life
Renewal of aging sludge dehydrators at
Ichimonji Terminal Treatment Plant
Construction of a new purification center
to replace the aging and non-earthquake
resistant existing purification center

596,800

351,500◼

Sludge recycling rate 100% (Composting)◼

Reduction of CO2 emissions bydownsizing of facilities and introducing
energy-saving equipment

58.90

Reduction of annual sludge generationand electricity consumption by adopting
dehydrators with lower moisture content
and other advanced equipment◼ Sludge recycling rate 38.09%(Composting, conversion to cement)(Plan)◼ Annual electricity consumption
3,047,842kWh → 2,524,000kWh (Plan)◼ Adoption of digestion gas power
generation to consume the electricity
produced by using gas generated during
sludge treatment within the treatment
facility (Power output = reduction amount
568,035kwh/year)◼

Imabari City

Ehime

Renewal of sludge treatment equipment
at Imabari Sewerage Treatment Center

Total Amount of Sludge Treatment Plant (Renewal) (14 projects)

506,962

204,480

9,460,646

3,741,735

40.33

83,02013,442,950

N/A

N/A

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity18

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 1
Pump Station (New)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Iwaki City

Fukushima

Ichikawa
City

Chiba

Ichihara City

Chiba

MatsumotoCity

Project Description

Construction of rainwater pipes to reduce
flood damage
Construction of a new pump station toaddress the reorganization of the publicsewerage (rainwater) drainage area

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
Amount (JPY
Total Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)
284,832

136,370

47.88

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

N/A
Efficient removal of inland water in anarea of about 70ha where urban functions
and population are concentrated◼ Improvement of public health, creation of
more comfortable living environment, andconservation of water quality in public
waters such as rivers and ocean areas◼

1,174,803

630,100

53.63

12,072309,399,696

N/A

N/A

Installation of manhole pumps to enable
natural drainage

6,600

6,600

100

78,400173,448

N/A

N/A

NaganoConstruction of additional sewerage
pumps to address the increasing sewage
inflow into Nagisa Relay Pump Station

8,910

6,100

68.46

12,617

1,269,492

N/A

N/A

Aichi

Construction of a new manhole pumpstation to address the expanded drainage
area

132,728

33,50025.24

266,12141,886,680

N/A

N/A

Mie

Construction of new inflow sewer pipes,
machinery buildings, dust removal
buildings, container buildings, machineryand electrical equipment for a rainwater
pump station

1,785,396

310,900

17.41

N/A

1,175,040

N/A

N/A

Construction of a new pump station

1,515,033

24,9491.65

474,777

88,898,952

N/A

N/A

◼

Stable sewerage treatment

Total length of sewer pipes newly
constructed: 1,794m◼ Annual volume of treated water to be
increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes is 458,528㎥ (Plan)◼

Toyohashi
City

MatsusakaCity

Higashi
Osaka
Osaka City
Wakayama
City (1)
Wakayama
Wakayama
City (2)Tokushima
Tokushima
City
Imabari City

Ehime

KashimaCity

Saga

645,980

307,000

Construction of new rainwater pumps at
Showa Pump Station
Construction of a wastewater relay
pump station necessary to connect to the
Imabari sewerage treatment area’s
eastern treatment system
Construction of a rainwater pump station
to reduce flood damage at the
Minamifunatsu drainage area

Total Amount of Pump Station (New) (12 projects)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

47,125

21,40045.41

189,750

96,66050.94

79,184

10,141,209

N/A

N/A

423,420

196,020

46.29

2,064

1,087,700

N/A

N/A

338,190

156,495

46.27

12,916

1,062,064

N/A

N/A

6,552,767

1,926,094※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

19

Enhancement of inland water removal toprevent flooding in urban areas◼

Upgrading of treatment capacity

Reduction of flood damage
Prevention of discharge of untreatedsewage into public waters due to heavyrain◼ Stronger flood countermeasures toimprove public health
◼

47.52

Construction of a rainwater pump station

◼

◼

◼

Total length of sewer pipes newly
constructed: 46,461m◼

Prevention of discharge of untreatedsewage into the ocean due to floods andheavy rain

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 2
Pump Station (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Hachinohe
City

Aomori

Akita City

Akita

Maebashi
City

Gunma

Chiba City
(1)
Chiba
Chiba City
(2)
Tachikawa
City

Tokyo

Zushi City

Kanagawa

Toyama City

ToyamaFukui City
(1)

Fukui

Fukui City
(2)
MatsumotoCity

NaganoProject Description

Renewal of No. 4 rainwater pump andelectrical instrumentation at Ote Pump
Station, private power generation facilities
at Ugaura Relay Pump Station, andelectrical instrumentation at Sumiyoshi
Pump Station
Electrical and mechanical works forpumps at a wastewater relay pumpstationRenewal of equipment at an aging pumpstationRenewal of sewage pumps at Iwagami
Pump Station

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
Amount (JPY
Total Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

476,849

269,100

56.43

15,1004,912,632

N/A

N/A

185,380

81,100

43.75

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

209,692

99,70047.55

285,830

22,179,480

N/A

N/A

N/A

10,12010,120100

2,680

278,830

N/A

N/A

N/A

Ensuring of stable sewerage treatment by
reducing risks of malfunctions◼ Annual electricity consumption
348,939kWh → 338,400kWh◼

89,24051,22957.41

381,100

3,192,602

N/A

N/A

Renovation of aging private power
generation facilities at Ochi Pump Stationin Nanbu Treatment Area

110,000

56,957

51.78

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Renewal of aging water pumps

11,965

11,70097.79

38,754

689,000

N/A

N/A

74,69074,690100

51,914

6,451,970

N/A

N/A

82,23637,00545.00

380,585

55,861,141

N/A

N/A

3,687,340

1,628,182

44.16
230,791

57,406

N/A

N/A

Renovation and renewal of powerreceiving and transforming facilities at
Nagisa Relay Pump Station

Replacement of devices with highefficiency ones at Ote Pump Station to
reduce power consumption◼ Annual electricity consumption
691,203kWh → 613,008kWh◼

Renovation of aging settling basin
equipment at Hibino Pump Station in Imba
Treatment Area

Renewal of devices of aging remotemonitoring system and renewal of devicesof a damaged manhole pump
Renewal of and seismic reinforcement
works for aging equipment outside Iwase
Wastewater Relay Pump Station
Renovation of aging Kamogawara Pump
Station to satisfy earthquake-resistant
standards and to improve drainage
capacity against floods
Renewal of aging equipment at a pumpstation

Other positive environmental impact

343,978

190,442

55.36

9,300

3,700

39.78

Ensuring of sewerage pumping capacity
during power outage◼

Annual electricity consumption
132,758kWh → 132,000kWh (Plan)
N/A◼

Annual electricity consumption
1,065,132kWh → 1,027,052kWh

N/AAnnual electricity consumption
4,435,596kWh → 4,208,371kWh◼ Renovation of aging equipment to ensurestable sewage treatment◼ Annual electricity consumption
94,296kWh → 81,036kWh (Estimate)◼

12,617

1,269,492

N/A

N/A

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity20◼

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 3
Pump Station (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Toyohashi
City (1)Toyohashi
City (2)Okazaki City

Aichi

Aichi

Project Description

Reinforcement of structure and steel
frames of facilities in pump stations
Execution design to reinforce structureand steel frames of facilities in pumpstations
Renewal of aging motors at a rainwater
pump station

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
Amount (JPY
Total Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)
65,07331,72048.75

4,190,760
266,12142,73423,30754.54

675,000

327,500

48.52

N/A

N/A

1,091,901

N/A

N/A

Other positive environmental impact◼

Improvement of seismic capacity◼

Improvement of seismic capacity
Annual electricity consumption
321,860kWh → 318,594kWh

◼

N/A

N/A

N/A
Ensuring of energy-saving benefits byadopting a simplified system◼ Annual electricity consumption
129,900kWh → 116,900kWh (Plan)◼

Tokai City

Aichi

Ise City

Mie

Fukuchiyama City

Kyoto

Higashiosak
a CityOsaka

Kakogawa
City

Hyogo

Wakayama
City (1)

Wakayama
City (2)
Wakayama
City (3)
Wakayama
City (4)Renewal of pumps and water treatment
equipment at Motohama Pump Station
Renewal of equipment at a rainwater
pump station
Renovation and renewal of aging
equipment

874,619394,976

45.16

5,391

4,760,000

N/A

N/A

3,365,916

246,200

7.31

69,604

6,126,267

N/A

N/A

10,788

6,200

57.47

64,11018,000,000

N/A

N/A

Renewal of a pump station

1,515,033

40,272

2.66

474,777

88,898,952

N/A

N/A

Renewal of aging mechanical andelectrical equipment at a pump station

211,855

101,500

47.91

25,0008,000,000

N/A

N/A

168,050

80,700

48.02

N/A

N/A

Renovation of rainwater pumps operated
beyond its durable life
Wakayama
Renovation of direct-current power-supply
equipment operated beyond its durable
life at a rainwater pump station
Renovation of sewage pumps operated
beyond their durable life

1,500,988
N/A

171,733

78,00045.42

10,132,080

21,682

10,40047.97

N/A

3,499,440

N/A

N/A

13,59912,30090.45

83,9981,259,756

N/A

N/A

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

21

N/A
Reduction of CO2 emissions by adoptingenergy-saving equipment◼ Improvementof earthquake resistanceand treatment capacity◼ Annual electricity consumption
630,427kWh → 566,965kWh◼ Ensuringof energy-saving benefits by
upgrading equipment◼ Extension of durable life of mechanicaland electrical equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
419,611kWh → 418,000kWh (Plan)◼ Preventionof discharge of untreatedsewage into public waters due to floods
and heavy rain
◼ Annual electricity consumption
80,576kWh → 76,428kWh◼ Annual electricity consumption
256,699kWh → 222,888kWh (Plan)
◼

N/A
◼

Annual electricity consumption
125,350kWh → 115,620kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 4
Pump Station (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Kure City

Hiroshima

Project Description

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
Amount (JPY
Total Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

367,818

188,33151.20

184,448

22,270,592

15.0

3.0

Sludge recycling rate 100% (composting
and conversion to cement)◼ Annual electricity consumption
17,285,748kWh → 16,605,514kWh

11,000

2,500

22.73

59,2585,556,560

N/A

N/A

◼

26,00018,35070.58

77,491

7,644,578

N/A

N/A

Improvement of public health, andconservation of water quality in public
waters552,482

189,600

34.32

8,803

792,000

N/A

N/A

◼

Reduction of flood damage◼

Hatsukaichi
City (1)Hiroshima

Hatsukaichi
City (2)Iwakuni City Yamaguchi

Renewal of monitoring and control
equipment at a pump station
Expansion of a pump-related facility (themain pump) at Hatsukaichi Purification
CenterRenovation and renewal of manhole
pumps
Renovation of rainwater drainage
facilities

Ensuring of stable treatment capacity to
improve public health◼ Annual electricity consumption
636,041kWh → 635,911kWh (Plan)◼ Reduction of CO
2 emissions by restoring
functions and installing energy-saving
equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
2,063,265kWh → 2,061,482kWh (Plan)◼ Reduction of CO emissions by installing2
energy-saving equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
1,374,661kWh → 1,247,885kWh◼

Tokushima
City

Tokushima

Renewal of aging equipment at pumpstations in the central and northpurification centers

15,145

10,06966.48

79,184

10,141,209

N/A

N/A

Takamatsu
City

KagawaRenovation of aging facilities

91,12844,80049.16

N/A

36,667,716

N/A

N/A

Marugame
City

KagawaRenewal of equipment at pump stations

947,714441,100

46.54

48,531

8,389,970

N/A

N/A

Imabari City

Ehime

Construction of additional rainwater
pumps at Tenpozan Drainage Pump
Station, and renewal of equipment atpump stations in the city

521,780

247,740

47.48

86,921

10,793,502

N/A

N/A

◼

Mitigation of flood damage due to heavy
rain in the city’s central drainage area,and prevention of discharge of untreatedsewage into the ocean due to floods andheavy rain
◼ Annual electricity consumption
19,580kWh → 17,784kWh (Plan)◼

KashimaCity

Saga

Renovation of Nakamuta Rainwater Pump
Station (renewal of a pump and dust
removal equipment)

348,386

174,193

50.00

12,6191,037,668

N/A

N/A

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

22

Annual electricity consumption
1,581,470kWh → 1,492,886kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 5
Pump Station (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Miyazaki(Miyazaki Treatment Area) Renovation of
aging manhole pumps(Ohyodo Treatment Area) Renovation of
aging manhole pumps
Renovation of power receiving andtransforming facilities, private power
generation facilities, operation equipment
and instrumentation equipment at therelay pump station in Ohyodo Treatment
Area
Renewal of aging devices ofuninterruptible power systems at the relay
pump station in Miyazaki Treatment Area
Renewal of a control panel’scommunication module at the manhole
pump station in Sadowara Treatment
Area
Renovation of an electric control panel at
the manhole pump station in Aoshima
Treatment Area under the time-based
maintenance program
Partial renovation of sewage pumps at therelay pump station in Aoshima Treatment
Area

Miyazaki
City (1)Miyazaki
City (2)Miyazaki
City (3)Miyazaki
City (4)Miyazaki
City (5)Miyazaki
City (6)Miyazaki
City (7)NobeokaCity

Miyazaki

Renewal of pumps

Total Amount of Pump Stations (Renewal) (41 projects)

Water
Water
Quality
Quality
JFM Loan
Covered Annual Water(BOD)(phosphorus)
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Area
Management(After(AfterCost
Amount (JPY
Total Project Population
Capacitytreatment,
treatment,(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)(persons)(㎥)
Year/Period Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)
20,540

6,600

32.13

162,915

106,661

23,20021.75

61,248

13,100

21.39

860

300

34.88

162,915

3,571,390

1,265

500

39.53

25,776

2,345,751

25,784

6,100

23.66

Other positive environmental impact

29,592,139
15,009,299

151,199
343,877◼

N/A

Stable sewerage treatment

N/A

728,3103,889
Stable sewerage treatment
Annual electricity consumption
60,623kWh → 59,753kWh◼ Stable treatment of rainwater and sewage◼ Seismic reinforcement works to increasesafety◼ Sludge recycling rate 100% (composting)
◼

8,616

3,400

39.46

601,666

300,900

50.01

16,134,965

5,537,783

678,02085,894

12,785,437

◼

2.6

1.7

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity23

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 1
Pipes (New)JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Installation of sewer pipes in sewer
undeveloped areas

217,543

155,800

71.62

162

28

Asahikawa
City

Hokkaido

Construction of rainwater pipes

580,993381,299

65.63

290

74

Chitose City

Hokkaido

Switching from a junction system to a
separate system with the new
construction of waste water pipes, and theconstruction of sewer pipes in sewer
undeveloped areas

116,900

116,900

100

1,098

11,890Hachinohe
City

Aomori

Extension of pipe networks to reduce
sewer uncovered areas

3,205,590

2,479,870

77.36

13,4291,784

Morioka City

Iwate

Installation of waste water pipes andrainwater pipes

1,534,397

1,038,900

67.71

9,460

256,993

Sendai City

Miyagi

158,454

79,227

50.00

2,873

755,108

Project Description

Positive environment impact
Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 3,204㎥ (Plan)◼ Prevention of the discharge of raw sewage into seas
◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 18,926㎥ (Estimate)◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 6,925,306㎥ (Plan)◼ Ensuring of a public health level and water quality in public waters◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 195,171㎥◼ Improvement of the living environment and conservation of water
quality in rivers and estuarine waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 196,951.16㎥◼ Maintenance of a hygienic water environment and water quality inpublic waters◼

Akita City

Akita

Development of a secure backup functionof the trunk lines in the event of a disaster
Installation of waste water pipes in sewer
uncovered areas, the installation of
rainwater pipes for flood control, and theinstallation of connection pipes for the
consolidation or closure of treatment
facilities

TsuruokaCity(1)

TsuruokaCity(3)TsuruokaCity(4)

Yamagata

New construction of rainwater pipes for
public sewers

Maintenance of sewer drainage functions in the event of a disaster

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 222,284m3◼ Conservation of water quality, improvement of living environment, andflood control◼ Reduction of the use of chemicals and electricity by improving theefficiency of wastewater treatment and utilizing economies of scale◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 58,475.52㎥ (Plan)◼ Conservation of water quality in public waters and improvement ofliving environment◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 89,672.83㎥ (Plan)◼ Conservation of water quality in public waters and improvement ofliving environment◼

1,213,563

741,300

61.08

6,647

2,656

186,233

155,300

83.39

1,762

74,600613,039

417,000

68.02

7,898

75,280217,000

130,700

60.23

356

N/A

181,593

97,200

53.53

410

N/A

New construction of waste water pipes for
public sewers
TsuruokaCity(2)◼

◼

Prevention and mitigation of flood damage by the installation of
rainwater culverts※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity24

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 2
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Iwaki City(1)Iwaki City(2)Project Description

JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)

Installation of rainwater pipes to mitigate
flood damage

55,00024,80045.09

N/A

60,05949,42582.29

346

Installation of waste water pipes in sewer
undeveloped areas

107,474

89,758

83.52

558

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

Positive environment impact

N/A

Fukushima
Iwaki City(3)Iwaki City(4)N/A
178,800

288,085

259,000

89.90

501

1,903,769

1,125,900

59.14

3,883

100,783

Hitachinaka
City

IbarakiInstallation of waste water pipes (foruncovered areas) and rainwater pipes (asflood control measures)

Miho Village

IbarakiNew construction of pipes

682,910348,100

50.97

706

12,669

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

New construction of sewer pipes in sewer
uncovered areas

223,127

195,400

87.57

4,621

493,032

668,761

668,761

100

3,781

237,087

MaebashiCity
TakasakiCity
YashioCity(1)
YashioCity(2)

Gunma
Gunma

Saitama

New construction of sewer trunk lines andbranch pipes
Construction of waste water pipes andrainwater pipes in uncovered areas
Construction of sewer pipes to drain into
public sewerage systems and rainwater
pipes to drain rainwater

1,653,225

729,500

44.13

273,274

94,60034.62

2,482,293

1,308,100

13,935284,171

6,734

73,988◼
◼

Maintenance of water quality in public waters
Mitigation of flood damage

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 66,137㎥◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 2,816,525㎥◼ Improvement of living environment by proper treatment of sewage◼

◼

Conservation of water quality in public waters◼

With the increase in the total length of sewer pipes, the area where
sewage systems are available will expand by approx. 85ha◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 74,645㎥ (Estimate)

52.70

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 625,358㎥◼ Improvement of water quality in public waters, by switching fromindependent septic tanks, which have a large environmental impact, topublic sewerage systems◼ Mitigation of flood damages on houses/buildings in the densely
populated areas◼

Ichikawa
City(1)
Ichikawa
City(2)
Funabashi
City

Chiba

Chiba

New construction of waste water pipes inuncovered areas
New construction of rainwater pipes in
undeveloped areas
Construction of pipes integrally with otherfacilities

4,503,247

2,438,800

54.16

14,557

4,694

1,095,034

618,100

56.45

386

N/A

4,172,645

2,574,400

61.70

11,174

600,729◼

Improvement of water quality

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 500,000㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of environmental hygiene through the expansion ofsewerage systems◼

Matsudo
City

Chiba

Installation of sewer pipes

1,630,540

996,400

61.11

10,279439,612※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity25

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 3
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

NarashinoCity(1)
NarashinoCity(2)

Project Description

JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)
824,000

412,000

50.00

1,487,900

743,900

50.00

131,298

93,50010,857

Construction of separate sewer systems
in uncovered areas

Ichihara
City(1)

Ichihara
City(2)

Construction of rainwater discharge trunklines

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

N/A

N/A

71.21

325

23

10,800

99.47

N/A

6

1,593,323

1,140,400

71.57

6,816.12

393,779

Construction of sewer pipes in the Kitagoi
Area(for sewage and rainwater drainage)

26,29911,290

42.93

175.2

19

Construction of waste water pipes(Kitaaoyagi Area)

113,81753,070

46.63

388.5

46

Ichihara
City(3)

Construction of waste water pipes(Furuichiba Area)

111,647

76,620

68.63

731.2

144

Ichihara
City(4)

Construction of waste water mounting
pipes in Ichihara District

1,725

1,350

78.26

N/A

5

204,826

134,285

65.56

637

156,534

231,641

201,687

87.07

836

156,628

137,291

77,62256.54

158

70,30854,493

77.51

117

NarashinoCity(3)

Kashiwa
City

Construction of sewerage facilities (sewer
pipes, public sewage basins, mounting
pipes, etc.)

Chiba

Chiba

OdawaraCity(1)
New construction of waste water pipes
OdawaraCity(2)
OdawaraCity(3)
OdawaraCity(4)◼

Mitigation of environmental impact by reducing the discharge of raw
sewage from junction pipes into public waters during heavy rains

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 3,316㎥ (Plan)◼ Mitigation of the impact on the surrounding environment by properly
treating sewage◼ Mitigation of the impact on the surrounding environment by properly
treating sewage◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 295,546.96㎥ (Plan)◼ Mitigation of the burden on the surrounding environment including Lake
Teganuma (to widen the area coverage of sewage treatment by
20.36ha)◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 4,096㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health, conservation of water quality in public
waters, and mitigation of flood damage◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 10,156㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health, and conservation of water quality inpublic waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 31,898㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health, and conservation of water quality inpublic waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 1,007㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health, and conservation of water quality inpublic waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 4,902㎥ (Plan)◼ Prevention of inflow of domestic wastewater into rivers◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 12,900㎥ (Plan)◼ Prevention of inflow of domestic wastewater into rivers
◼

Chiba

NarashinoCity(4)

Positive environment impact

Kanagawa

New construction of rainwater pipes

N/A◼

Mitigation of the risk of flood damage※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity26

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 4
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Zushi City

Kanagawa

Samukawa
Town

Kanagawa

Toyama City

ToyamaFukui City

Project Description
Construction of manhole toilet systems inevacuation centers, development ofrainwater pipes and other facilities, anddevelopment of bypass pipes between
existing manholes
Installation of waste water and rainwater
pipes for public sewerage systems

JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

Positive environment impact

N/A

100,073

79,217

79.16

726

3,550

66,591

43,49765.32

28

45,865

New construction of pipes

1,112,610

741,359

66.63

2,652

380,585

Fukui

Construction of pipes in uncovered areas

3,166,067

2,527,972

79.85

27,431

230,791

Nagano City

NaganoNew construction of rainwater pipes

1,168,890

594,500

50.86

820

145,098

MatsumotoCity(1)
MatsumotoCity(2)

New construction of Chikuma waste water
trunk lines, concurrently with road
improvement work

9,593

6,100

63.59

Nagano40

125,481274

N/A

43,160

4,700

10.89

61,48039,40064.09

258,797

159,400

61.59

New construction of pipes

1,018,500

779,900

76.57

5,912

N/A

Gifu City(1)GifuConstruction of drainage

Gifu City(2)Fuji City

Shizuoka

Toyohashi
City

Aichi

Installation of rainwater pipes

393,847

197,940

50.26

262

266,121

Okazaki City

Aichi

New construction of sewer pipes

735,970

410,574

55.79

8,956

342,884

Hekinan City

Aichi

Yokkaichi
City

Mie

Ise City

Mie

Matsusaka
City(1)
Matsusaka
City(2)Mie

Installation of sewer systems inuncovered areas
New construction of sewer pipes inuncovered areas
New construction of sewer pipes as partof a regional sewerage development
project

1,641,053

877,400

53.47

9,134

63,9605,751,813

3,346,000

58.17

10,760251,666

3,365,916

1,551,200

46.09

9,736

69,604

726,500

40.69

9,158

82

88,700

4.97

491

N/A

Installation of waste water pipes
1,785,396

Installation of rainwater pipes

Improvement of water quality in public waters and mitigation of
rainwater inundation◼ Improvement of water quality by controlling the inflow of untreatedwaste water into rivers, etc.
◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 739,476.9㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of water quality in public waters◼ Prevention of discharge of raw sewage into rivers due to inundationand heavy rains◼

◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 21,125,688㎥ (Estimate)

N/A
Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 10,934㎥◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 2,615,842㎥ (Plan)◼ Mitigation of flood damage◼

N/A
Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 72,090㎥◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 480,741㎥◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 59,743㎥◼ Conservation of water quality in public waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 948㎥ (Plan)◼

◼

Mitigation of flood damage※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity27

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 5
Pipes (New)JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Nabari City

Mie

Construction of sewerage ducts inuncovered areas of the northern part ofthe city

375,035

237,200

63.25

2,929

52,780

Fukuchiyama CityKyoto

Rehabilitation of drainage canals in areas
where flood control measures have notbeen implemented

62,981

18,20028.90

9464,110

Positive environment impact◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 2,000㎥ (Plan)◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 18,000,000㎥ (Plan)

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 95,351.14㎥ (Estimate)◼ Improvement of living environment by improving water quality in public
waters◼

Uji City

Kishiwada
City(1)
Kishiwada
City(2)
Higashiosak
a CityKyoto

Installation of pipes

184,525

136,400

73.92

1,536

177,572

New construction of sewer pipes

3,728

3,500

93.88

30

20

New construction of rainwater pipes

8,540

8,100

94.85

57

8

1,515,033

387,65625.59

3474,777

374,205

374,194

100

Osaka

610,646

610,585

99.99
2,801

478,474

192

New construction of pipes

Himeji
City(1)
Himeji
City(2)
Himeji
City(3)Hyogo

New construction of pipes

Himeji
City(4)
Kakogawa
City
Wakayama
City(1)Hyogo

New construction of sewer pipes in sewer
undeveloped areas

Wakayama

New construction of sewer pipes (toincrease sewerage penetration rates andprevent floods

Fukuyama
City(1)
Fukuyama
City(2)

1,203,000

601,500

50.00

298,493

150,67850.48

1,577,092

1,241,800

78.74

3,676

1,521,178

859,600

56.51

5,761.9

76,23062,00081.33

N/A

528,090435,755

82.52

7,263

562,313

393,000

69.89

6,544

532,623

374,500

70.31

6,198

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 860㎥ (Plan)
N/A◼

Improvement of treatment capacity◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 59,076㎥

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 54,533㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health and living environment◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 192,402.5㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public water environment◼

Wakayama
City(2)Kure City

◼

Osaka

Hiroshima

Hiroshima

Installation of sewer pipes in sewer
undeveloped areas

137,126◼

Improvement of public water environment

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 11,015㎥◼ Improvement of living environments◼

New construction of pipes

184,448

350,209◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 253,044㎥◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 240,232㎥※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity28

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 6
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityHatsukaichiCity(1)
HatsukaichiCity(2)
HatsukaichiCity(3)
HatsukaichiCity(4)Prefecture

Project Description

JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)
1,470,031

950,600

64.67

18,106

4,100

22.64

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

7,033
Hiroshima

Installation of pipes
301,400

60.37

15,79315,70099.41

19,346,046

742,300

3.84

3,991

Iwakuni City Yamaguchi

New construction of waste water pipes for
public sewerage systems

5,005

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 175,698㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of public health and conservation of water quality inpublic waters◼

77,491
499,226

Positive environment impact

N/A

N/A
Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 205,855㎥ (Plan)◼ Improvement of water quality by proper treatment of sewage◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 160,150㎥◼ Creation of a comfortable living environment through water quality
conservation in public waters◼ Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 68,111㎥ (Plan)◼

Tokushima
City

Tokushima

Construction of sewer pipes, restorationof pavement, etc.

858,872

621,937

72.41

3,933

79,184

Marugame
City

KagawaNew construction of waste water pipes

1,169,443

140,850

12.04

1,084

48,531

Imabari City

Ehime

Installation of sewer pipes in uncovered
areas

612,172

375,990

61.42

6,264

80,438Niihama City

Ehime

Installation of pipes

938,228

564,100

60.12

3,751

74,261

Karatsu City

Saga

Installation of pipes

239,700

239,700

100

2,039

87,169KashimaCity

Saga

Construction and paving of waste watersemi-trunk lines and branch lines, and theinstallation of rain drainage systems in
Minamifunatsu Area

NagasakiCity(1)
NagasakiCity(2)

NagasakiInstallation of rainwater storage pipes andrainwater pipes and the installation ofwaste water pipes under public/private
roads

◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 59,547㎥ (Plan)

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 47.8㎥◼ Mitigation of domestic wastewater discharge to waterways◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 24,396㎥ (Plan) (the service area will be
newly extended by 4.16ha)◼ Conservation of water quality and improvement of living environment inpublic waters by sewage treatment◼ Mitigation of flood damage◼

479,629

252,841

52.72

2,098

916,224

583,900

63.73

N/A

12,619N/A
N/A

472,109

310,474

65.76

212

◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 6,844㎥※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity29

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 7
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

MiyazakiCity(1)

New construction of rainwater pipes

MiyazakiCity(2)

New construction of waste water
pipes(Miyazaki Area)

MiyazakiCity(3)

JFM Loan
Newly
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/constructed
Cost
AmountTotal Project pipe length(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)(m)

Covered
Area
Population(persons)

Positive environment impact

N/A

374,466

91,50024.43

978364,269

304,359,441

105,700

0.03

738.4

162,915

New construction of waste water pipes(Sadowara Area)

3,355

1,000

29.81

26

25,776

New construction of waste water pipes(Aoshima Area)

8,075

1,900

23.53

98.5

3,889

MiyazakiCity(5)

New construction of waste water pipes(Ohyodo Area)

19,411

3,200

16.49

N/A

151,199

MiyazakiCity(6)

New construction waste water pipes(Tano Area)

963

400

41.54

N/A

7,141

MiyazakiCity(7)

New construction of waste water pipes(Kibana Area)

10,622

2,500

23.54

109.4

13,349MiyazakiCity(8)New construction of waste water pipes

9,869

3,948

40.00

738.4

162,915

Kagoshima
KagoshimaCity

New construction of sewerage duct
facilities

2,115,862

1,355,000

64.04

4,860

468,400

396,337,881

44,715,524

MiyazakiCity(4)
Miyazaki

Total Amount of Pipes (New) (94 projects)◼

Conservation of water quality in public waters◼

Annual volume of treated water to be increased by the new
construction of sewer pipes is 83,271.7㎥※ Total Project Cost and JFM Loan Amount that overlap with other projects are excluded from the Total Amount※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity30

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 8
Pipes (Renewal)
JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
AmountTotal Project(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Renewal of aging pipes

817,233

637,200

77.97

25,631

Asahikawa
City

Hokkaido

Renewal of waste water pipes

164,017

159,401

97.19

52,925

Chitose City

Hokkaido

Rehabilitation of deteriorated waste water
pipes

804,400

804,400

100

599,330

N/A

Hachinohe
City

AomoriReconstruction of pipes

146,917

110,400

75.14

17,942,633

N/A

Morioka City

Iwate

Rehabilitation of aging pipes

348,705

200,800

57.58

40,172,415

Akita City

Akita

Renovation of aging pipes and renewal of
manhole pump facilities

1,516,346

814,400

53.71

34,404,630

72,81541,70052.27

TsuruokaCity(1)
TsuruokaCity(2)

Yamagata

Project Description

Renewal and upgrading of sewer pipe
facilities

Annual Water Treated(m3)

13,505,000
29,71815,70052.83

Positive environment impact◼

Prevention of sewage runoff from contaminating the ground during
earthquakes and other natural disasters◼

Prevention of serious accidents/malfunctions due to aging of seweragefacilities.(the area subject to this renewal project covers approx. 1.8km)

Maintenance of sanitary water environments through the conservationof water quality in public waters◼ Seismic strengthening and life extension of sewer pipes◼ Reduction of the use of chemicals and electricity at treatment plants by
reducing water intrusion during rainy weather◼

◼

Conservation of water quality in public waters and maintenance ofliving environment

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

Rehabilitation of aging pipes and seismic
strengthening of existing pipes

514,658

471,800

91.67

91,192,377◼

Ensuring of appropriate sewage treatment even during a disaster

Maebashi
City

Gunma

A project to renovate or upgrade pipes
including the maintenance of rainwater
trunk lines in re-zoning areas

337,439

337,439100

38,725,002◼

Extension of the durable life of pipes

Reconstruction and seismic retrofitting of
aging pipes

118,371

118,371

100

Chiba

◼

Prevention of underground contamination due to sewage runoff frombroken pipes during earthquakes and other natural disasters◼

Improvement of public health and maintenance of water quality inpublic waters◼

Soil pollution control
Extension of the durable life of facilities

Chiba
City(1)
Chiba
City(2)
Ichikawa
City

Chiba

Funabashi
City

Chiba

Narashino
City

Chiba

Tachikawa
City(1)
Tachikawa
City(2)

Tokyo

N/A
959,516

550,744

57.40

Reconstruction and renewal of aging
sewerage facilities
Refurbishment and repair of existing
facilities to prevent road cave-ins due tothe deterioration
Reconstruction with internal rehabilitationof waste water pipes

22,69017,90078.89

N/A

446,276

393,500

88.17

N/A

43,66843,60099.84

N/A

Renewal of pipes (for flood control)

163,460

103,700

63.44

66,635,568

Development of facilities required forwater supply from Nishikicho Sewage
Treatment Plant to Kitatama No. 2 Water
Recycling Center

1,337,800

599,700

44.83

17,187,850◼

◼

Mitigation of environmental burden by preventing water outflow into
the surrounding environment
N/A◼

Improvement of water environment with the introduction of advanced
treatment technologies※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity31

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 9
Pipes (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

OdawaraCity(1)
OdawaraCity(2)
OdawaraCity(3)

Samukawa
Town (1)Samukawa
Town (2)JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
AmountTotal Project(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)
285,471

145,757

51.06

343,754

238,308

69.33

Annual Water Treated(m3)

Kanagawa

27,900,467
Extension of the durable life of waste
water pipes

Kanagawa

Rehabilitation of sewerage duct facilities
as measures to extend durable life

Kanagawa

Renewal of aging manhole covers

79,321

32,03640.39

159,458

110,11269.05

29,05523,05579.35

55,32332,023

57.88

841

841

100

5,582,446

ToyamaRenewal of aging sewer pipe facilities

974,095

583,482

59.90

55,861,141

Fukui City

Fukui

A project to rehabilitate and reconstructpipes to address aging pipes

1,046,463

602,800

57.60

57,406,000

Renewal of aging waste water pipes

433,438

382,600

88.27

42,128,000

Execution design for renewal of failure
reporting equipment at manhole pumpstations, etc.

2,970

1,300

43.77

Renewal of manhole pump facilities in
Hirashigaki District

26,004

11,70044.99

388,688

247,200

63.60

645,930

551,000

85.30

269,604

256,100

94.99

244,958

80,10032.70

1,214,556

667,85854.99

711,583

355,79350.00

1,080,430

543,126

50.27

NaganoCity(1)NaganoNaganoCity(3)
MatsumotoCity(1)
MatsumotoCity(2)

NaganoUpgrading of pipes and earthquakeresistance measures for sewerage duct
facilities

Gifu City(1)Gifu
Gifu City(2)ToyohashiCity(1)
ToyohashiCity(2)
Okazaki City

Aichi

Aichi

N/A

21,125,688

Reconstruction of sewer pipes

Rehabilitation of aging pipes

Renewal of waste water pipes andjunction pipes◼

Prevention of sewage runoff from contaminating the ground during
earthquakes and other natural disasters by renewal of aging pipes

N/A

Toyama City

NaganoCity(2)

Positive environment impact

Seismic retrofitting of waste water pipes

OdawaraCity(4)
Zushi City

Project Description

N/A◼

Conservation of discharged water quality in public waters by reducing
the inflow of rainwater through replacement with iron covers◼

Maintenance of stable sewage treatment functions
N/A◼

Prevention of sewage runoff from contaminating the ground during
earthquakes and other natural disasters◼

Energy conservation through the installation of new equipment/facilities◼

Stable sewage treatment during earthquakes and other natural
disasters

56,036,281

N/A

41,886,680

N/A

N/A

N/A

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity32

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 10
Pipes (Renewal)
JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
AmountTotal Project(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (%)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Ise City

Mie

Renewal of sewerage manhole pumpequipment and rainwater pipes

3,365,916

34,700Nabari City

Mie

Renewal of pipes

107,949

Fukuchiyama
City

Kyoto

Renovation of manhole iron covers basedon the remaining durable life of eachcover, seismic strengthening of pipes, etc.

Uji City

Kyoto

Kishiwada
City(1)
Kishiwada
City(2)

Osaka

Higashiosaka
City (1)Osaka
Higashiosaka
City (2)
Wakayama
City(1)
Wakayama
Wakayama
City(2)Kure City
Fukuyama
City(1)
Fukuyama
City(2)Tokushima
City

Annual Water Treated(m3)

Positive environment impact

1.03

6,126,267

N/A

59,00054.66

7,628,500

N/A

304,771

172,250

56.52

18,000,000

N/A

Renewal of pipes

82,09053,30064.93

N/A

Installation of new pipes for flood control

14,527

4,400

30.29

18,000Replacement of mounting pipes toprevent rainwater and groundwater fromentering sewer pipes

16,760

5,200

31.03

16,0001,515,033

662,92343.76

363,143

283,100

77.96

134,727

66,50049.36

15,414

23,15621,00090.69

768

506,384

232,651

45.94

22,270,592

124,874

62,43750.00

869,790514,055

59.10

Reconstruction of aging pipes, etc.

540,926

314,374

58.12

18,660,523

Project Description

Hiroshima

Renewal of aging pipes

Hiroshima

Renewal of pipes

Tokushima

88,898,952

Replacement and rehabilitation of pipes

329,928

254,270

77.07

14,387,682

Tosu City

Saga

Construction of rainwater pipes

138,771

72,91052.54

8Miyazaki

Renewal of manhole covers
Renewal and seismic retrofitting of aging
pipes

Total Amount of Pipes (Renewal) (54 projects)

Strengthening of earthquake resistance and treatment capacity◼

Prevention of sewage inflow into the ground due to pipe breakage
during natural disasters

37,593,017

Ehime

Saga

◼

N/A

Imabari City

KashimaCity
MiyazakiCity

Enhancement of living environment by improving water quality in theentire public waters

N/A

Renewal of pipes

Rehabilitation and renewal of end-of-life
pipes

◼

4,293

2,500

58.23

1,037,668

1,405,137

314,200

22.36

29,592,139

25,684,146

13,415,716

N/A◼

Prevention of soil contamination due to sewage outflow from aging
pipes
N/A

◼

Mitigation of flood damage by heavy rains

Conservation of water quality in public waters by reducing rainwater
infiltration into waste water pipes◼ Prevention of sewage flowing into the ground during earthquakes andother natural disasters◼

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity33

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Others 1
Others (New)JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
Amount (JPY
Total Project(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Morioka City

Iwate

Contribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

110,703

109,000

98.46

N/A

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

Contribution for project of regional sewerage systems

43,221

43,20099.95

N/A

Chiba City

Chiba

Construction of rainwater storage tanks, etc.

270,000

165,000

61.11

Funabashi
City

Chiba

Contribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

541,497

467,300

86.30

Contribution for construction of Lake Inbanuma regional seweragesystem project

34,80234,80099.99

Cost for outsourcing execution design to construct junction pipes, andcompensation to relocate obstacles before construction of rainwater
pipes

215,314214,100

99.44

Cost for execution design to construct junction pipes, and compensation
to relocate obstacles before construction of sewerage pipes

16,576

11,50069.38

Contribution for regional sewerage systems

211,941

178,900

84.41

4,235

4,020

94.92

4,002

3,800

94.95

6,706

6,370

94.99

Final restoration of pavement after construction of sewer pipes (Goi
Station East Exit Area)

677

640

94.53

Final restoration of pavement after construction of sewer pipes (Kita
Aoyagi Area)

608

490

80.59

Ichihara City
(6)

Final restoration of pavement after construction of sewer pipes(Furuichiba Area)

4,918

3,380

68.73

Ichihara City
(7)

Final restoration of pavement after construction of sewer pipes(Ohmaya Area)

12,547

6,720

53.56

Ichihara City
(8)

Execution design necessary to construct sewerage pipes (Furuichiba
Area)

8,594

5,280

61.44

Ichihara City
(9)

Execution design necessary to construct sewerage pipes (Wakamiya
Area)

3,721

3,530

94.87

Narashino
City (1)Narashino
City (2)Chiba

Narashino
City (3)Kashiwa
City

Chiba

Contribution for outsourcing execution design to construct theprefecture’s water pipes that are temporarily diverted due tointerference caused by sewer construction
Contribution for construction of the prefecture’s water pipes that are
temporarily diverted due to interference caused by sewer construction(Furuichiba Area)
Contribution for construction of the prefecture’s water pipes that are
temporarily diverted due to interference caused by sewer construction(Ichihara Area)

Ichihara City
(1)
Ichihara City
(2)

Ichihara City
(3)
Ichihara City
(4)
Ichihara City
(5)

Project Description

Chiba

Positive environmental impact◼

Reduction of flood damage
N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

◼

Repair of bumpy road surface to reduce noise and vibration, ensuring
safe and comfortable living environment for citizens

N/A※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity34

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Others 2
Others (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Tokyo

Construction of facilities for sending sewage from Nishikicho Sewerage
Treatment Plant to Kitatama No. 2 Water Reclamation Center

Tachikawa
City (1)

JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
AmountTotal Project(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (％)

Positive environmental impact

51,00022,90044.90

1,082,920

486,400

44.92

20,759,525

772,000

3.72

N/A

1,604,621

1,192,400

74.31

N/A

748,080

748,064100

Improvement of water quality and reduction of rain flood in public
waters by replacing vault toilets and single septic tanks with the publicsewerage system

Outsourcing of execution design for sluice pipes to improve rivers

5,225

5,225

100

N/A

Construction of rainwater pipes

107,660

28,00026.01

Contribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

141,495

141,300

99.86

N/A

Administrative / labor costs and contribution for regional seweragesystems to construct new sewer pipes

128,982

128,600

99.70

N/A

Uji City (2)Costs to design and construct rainwater storage facilities

491,759

284,400

57.83

N/A

Kishiwada
City

Osaka

21,49420,20093.98

N/A

Kure City

Hiroshima

Replacement of manhole pump control panels and reporting devices
that reach their durable life
Purchase of fixed assets, design work, and commissioning of real
property registration

79,89139,49749.44

N/A

1,939,409

1,216,910

62.75

1,718,682

849,43149.42

14,900

7,400

49.66

74,30970,50094.87

284,998

270,700

94.98

30,745,012

7,541,957

Tachikawa
City (2)Kawasaki
City

Kanagawa

Hiratsuka
City

Kanagawa

Samukawa
Town (1)Kanagawa
Samukawa
Town (2)MatsumotoCity

NaganoIse CityMie

Uji City (1)Kyoto

Fukuyama
City (1)Fukuyama
City (2)
Hatsukaichi
City
Nagasaki
City (1)Nagasaki
City (2)Hiroshima

Construction of two or more facilities including those for seweragetreatment / advanced treatment / sludge treatment, and pump stations,sewer pipes, etc.
Construction of and seismic reinforcement works on sewerage ducts,
and works on pump stations for earthquake resistance and longer
durable life
Contribution for construction of regional sewerage pipes, rainwater
culverts and retention ponds associated with the land rearrangement
project◼

◼

◼

Advanced wastewater treatment to improve the water environment

Reduction of discharge of untreated sewage into rivers due to heavy
rain

Projects related to rainwater facilities

Hiroshima

Construction of additional pumps at and improvement of seismic
capacity of Ohgi Pump Station

NagasakiConstruction of a new city hall

Total Amount of Others (New) (34 projects)

N/A◼

Prevention of floods

N/A※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity35

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Others 3
Others (Renewal)
JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
Amount (JPY
Total Project(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Hakodate
City

Hokkaido

Renewal of facilities including those for sewerage and sludge treatment
and sewer pipes (contribution for project of regional sewerage systems)

63,86260,80095.21

N/A

Hachinohe
City

AomoriContribution for construction of regional sewerage systems(renewal of power receiving & transforming facility in the treatment
plant’s control building, and renovation of sewerage duct facilities)

21,60020,70095.83

N/A

Contribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

321,705

304,300

94.59

N/A

Renewal of the treatment plant’s fire equipment, and outsourcing ofexecution design to construct a new pump station

32,67817,800

54.47

N/A

N/A

Akita City
(1)
Akita City
(2)

Akita

Positive environmental impact

Hitachinaka
City

IbarakiContribution for construction of regional sewerage systems(contributions to renovate electrical and mechanical equipment in Naka
Kuji Purification Center)

35,40731,70089.53

Takasaki
City

Gunma

Improvement of sewerage treatment facilities and equipment, andcontribution for regional sewerage systems

344,327

277,200

80.50

Hiratsuka
City

Kanagawa

Construction of and seismic reinforcement works on sewerage ducts,
and works on pump stations for earthquake resistance and longer
durable life

14,091

13,70097.23

N/A

Zushi City

Kanagawa

Renovation of shutters at settling basin building

29,05523,055

79.35

N/A

Samukawa
Town

Kanagawa

Outsourcing of development of plans to renovate aging manhole covers

10,450

6,350

60.77

N/A

Contribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

23,10023,100100

N/A

Improvement of facilities to prevent floods

24,16823,454

97.05

N/A

540,750

540,600

99.97

N/A

650

600

92.31

N/A

Fukui City
(1)
Fukui City
(2)◼

Prevention of serious accidents to be caused by aging of seweragefacilities

Fukui

Nagano City

NaganoContribution for construction of regional sewerage systems

MatsumotoCity

NaganoContribution for regional sewerage systems

Fukuchiyama CityKyoto

Seismic diagnosis of sewerage facilities, and execution design torenovate and renew aging facilities

283,797

144,650

50.97

N/A

Administrative / labor costs for renewal of a sewerage treatment plant

6,060

6,000

99.01

N/A

Design of facilities for advanced treatment

10,500

5,200

49.52

N/A

Outsourcing fees related to regional sewerage sludge treatment

5,673

5,100

89.90

N/A

Uji City (1)Kyoto
Uji City (2)Kishiwada
City

Osaka

※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity36

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Others 4
Others (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

HigashiOsaka City

Osaka

Renewal of facilities related to Neya River’s southern regional sewerage
project

Hyogo

Construction of a terminal sewerage treatment plant (reinforced
concrete), construction of sewer pipes, and installation of equipment atpump stations

Hyogo

Renewal of two or more facilities including those for sewerage treatment/ advanced treatment / sludge treatment, and pump stations, sewer
pipes, etc.

JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
Amount (JPY
Total Project(JPY 1,000)
1,000)
Cost (％)
502,361

500,200

99.57

Positive environmental impact◼

Annual electricity consumption
630,427kWh → 566,965kWh

Sustaining environmental benefits of public sewerage systems throughrenovation/renewal of and seismic countermeasures for aging facilities◼ Reduction of power consumption and greenhouse gas emissions byadopting sophisticated facilities◼ Improvement of seismic capacity of sewer pipes and extension of their
durable life◼

Kobe City

Nishinomiya
City (1)Nishinomiya
City (2)
Nishinomiya
City (3)Kakogawa
City

Hyogo

Contribution for regional sewerage systems

1,065,601

620,000

58.18

4,206,027

683,500

16.25

2,716,036

1,423,600

52.41

1,230,794

443,000

35.99

196,618

192,400

97.85

N/A

N/A

Hiroshima
City

Hiroshima

Renovation of aging public sewerage facilities, etc.

1,120,000

520,000

46.43

Sludge recycling rate 100% (composting and conversion to cement,
fuels)◼ Effective and full use of digestion gas emitted in the sewerage sludge
treatment process to generate power◼ Reduction of greenhouse gas emitted by sewage treatment(emissions in FY2021 were 30.6% lower than the FY2013 level)◼ Reduction of power consumption by installing high- efficiency
equipment◼ Annual electricity consumption
5,407,972kWh → 5,244,986kWh

Kure City

Hiroshima

Design work, duty to change business plan, and study of rebuilding

72,606

21,65929.83

N/A

10,506

5,253

50.00

Hiroshima

Projects related to rainwater treatment facilities
275,752

131,31447.62

120,000

54,00045.00

155,700

43,600

28.00

7,919

7,900

99.76

◼

Fukuyama
City (1)Fukuyama
City (2)
Hatsukaichi
City (1)
Hatsukaichi
City (2)Hiroshima

Renovation and renewal of private power generation facilities at
Hatsukaichi Purification Center

Iwakuni City Yamaguchi

Construction for regional sewerage systems

Tokushima
City

Administrative costs for sewerage systems and contribution for
construction of office buildings

Tokushima

N/A

92,25392,08899.82◼

Improvement of public health and conservation of water quality inpublic waters◼

Improvement of public health and conservation of water quality inpublic waters

N/A※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity37

(iii) Project by Project Reporting: Others 5
Others (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Tosu City (1)Tosu City (2)Saga

Tosu City (3)KashimaCity

Saga

Kagoshima
Kagoshima
City

Project Description

JFM Loan
Total Project JFM Loan
Amount/Cost
AmountTotal Project(JPY 1,000) (JPY 1,000)
Cost (％)

Positive environmental impact

Relocation of sewerage pipes and manhole pumps in the city,
installation of sewerage basins, pavement, and exploratory excavation

232,561

112,279

48.28

Execution design to renovate Tosu City north relay pump station forearthquake resistant and expansion

22,00011,00050.00

Execution design to renovate and renew aging pipes (rehabilitation andreplacement)

5,830

2,915

50.00

Outsourcing of execution design for a purification center

61,00030,50050.00

N/A

Renovation and renewal of aging equipment and sewerage ducts

2,115,862

1,355,000

64.04

N/A

13,861,437

6,399,517

Total Amount of Others (Renewal) (36 projects)◼

Improvement of living environment and conservation of water quality
in public waters

N/A※ Total Project Cost and JFM Loan Amount that overlap with other projects are excluded from the Total Amount※ Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

38

Case Study 1: Fukuchiyama City Sludge Treatment Plant Reconstruction Project
Project Overview (Project Period: FY2022 - FY2025 (tentative))<Rendering image>
Sludge Treatment Plant Reconstruction Project in Fukuchiyama City

Solid Fuel
Conversion Facility

SludgeConcentration/Sludge
Dewatering Facility

Total Project Cost：
- of which JFM funds ：(Apr. 2022 - Mar.2023)

Digestion
Tank

Sludge Collection
Building◼

The Fukuchiyama Sludge Treatment Plant commenced its operation in 1966, and currently treats~49,000m3 of sewage annually. As 57 years had passed since the start of the plant operation, sewer
facilities showed some signs of aging.

◼

The Plant started to adopt the evaporative drying method in 1976, and subsequently it commenced theoperation of the current sludge incineration plant in 1999. As some 20 years had passed since theconstruction of the sludge treatment facilities, including the existing sludge incineration facilities, it was
about time to refurbish the facilities. Amid such situation, the Sewerage Law was amended in 2015 torequire sewerage business operators to make efforts to recycle sludge generated at their facilities.

◼

Fukuchiyama City has been working on the basic concept /plans for the effective use of sludge since2017, under which it has launched a project to reconstruct a sludge treatment plant in FY2021 with thetarget completion in FY2025.

◼

JFM funds will be used for the development of detailed facility designs for the effective use of sewage
sludge, the dismantling of the old sludge treatment plant and the construction of new facilities.

Low Pressure
Gas Holder

Highlights

JPY 117.4 million
JPY 52.9 million

Environmental impacts expected from the new construction of solid fuel conversion and digestion facilities

Aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by ~68% to decarbonize sewerage facilities by constructing solid fuelconversion and digestion facilities that effectively utilize the energy from sewage sludge◼ The use of digestion gas generated at digestion tanks as supplemental fuel for solid fuel conversion facilities willcontribute to the reduction of fossil fuels used at the plant(*1)◼ Solid sludge fuels generated at these facilities will be used to replace fossil fuels in thermal power plants (*2)
◼ Sewage sludge, etc. which will be effectively utilized through this project will include sewage sludge (including
drainage from agricultural communities), human waste, and septic tank sludge generated throughout the city,
aiming to cover a wider area in the future◼

Project Image
Primary sludge
Excess sludge

Digestion tankSpecific
AgriculturalseweragedrainagesystemHuman
Septic tankwaste

Dehydrator*1 Used as a supplemental fuel for solid fuel conversion
facilities*2 Used as an alternative fuel for coal at thermal power
plants◼

Reduction in CO2 emissions: ~2,780t-CO2/year (~ 68% reduction)◼

Sewage sludge recycling rate: 100%

Expected Benefits【Greenhouse gas emissions (t-CO2/year) 】
4,100~2,780t-CO2/year
To be reduced by~68%

Digestedsludge1,317

Dehydrated sludge
Concentrator
Concentrated
sludgeDesulfurizationequipment gas
holderSolid fuel conversion facility（carbonization furnace）

Solid fuel fromsewage sludge

Digestiongas*1

For power
generation *2
Sell

Current

39

After the completion<Reference> Fukuchiyama City, Kyoto
DATA
Population

77,306 (as of October 1, 2020)

Area

552.54㎢ (as of July 1, 2023)

Sewerage Coverage

84.4% (as of March 31, 2022)

City Budget

JPY 47.1 billion (FY2023 General Account Initial Budget)

Demographic Trend(1,000 people)★

Overview◼

Fukuchiyama City, Kyoto, is located in the northwestern part of Kyoto, about 60 km
northwest from Kyoto City in a straight line. The city has been developing as atransportation hub connecting Keihanshin and Kitakinki. It is also an industrial basehaving “Osadano Industrial Park, which is one of Japan’s leading inland industrial
park, completed and started operation in 1974, and the “Annex Kyoto Miwa of
Osadano Industrial Park.”◼

Fukuchiyama Castle, which was built around 1579 by Akechi Mitsuhide who
pacified the Tamba area, was destroyed in the early Meiji era and restored in 1986.
In 2017, the castle was designated as one of the “Next 100 Most Famous Castles.”In November 2018, the “Ryuo Championship Match,” the highest title match in
Shogi (Japanese traditional board game), was held in the castle.

◼

Located at the foot of Mt. Oe, where there are three oni (Japanese ogre) legends,
the “Japanese Ogre Exchange Museum” is a museum exclusively focusing onogre that is unique in Japan. The museum introduces the oni legends of Mt. Oe
and exhibits traditional performing arts related to local oni legends from all overJapan and various artworks on ogre from all over the world such as ogre masks.

40

200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

79

77

76

74

72

69

67

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045 (Year)*Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Regional Population
Projections for Japan (2018)

Fukuchiyama Castle andAutumn Leaves

Giant Onigawara and the Japanese
Ogre Exchange Museum

Case Study 2: Karatsu City Purification Center Digestion Tank Renovation Project
Highly efficient heating system(sludge thermal solubilizing equipment)

Project Overview (Project Period: FY2020 - FY2022)
Total Project Cost
：JPY 815.2 million- of which JFM funds ：JPY 367.5 million(Apr. 2022 - Mar. 2023)◼ The sludge digestion tank of Karatsu City’s Purification Center was installed in 1985,

facing aging problem. The tank needed to be renovated according to a renovation
benchmark stated in the city’s sewerage stock management plan.
◼ The current design standards recommend single-stage sludge digestion process, but thecity used to treat sludge in double-stage process because the single-stage process using
its old tank did not satisfy the required number of days for digestion.

◼ The city introduced the sludge thermal solubilizing technology adopted in the B-DASH

Project (※) of Japan’s Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, enabling
efficient sludge digestion. This improvement ensures sufficient number of days fordigestion and enables single-stage process instead of the double-stage digestion.
※B-DASH Project(Breakthrough by Dynamic Approach in Sewage High Technology Project)
The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism studies and demonstrates
new technologies’ applicability to accelerate R&D and commercialization of thesetechnologies, so as to build a low-carbon & recycling-based society, reduce lifecycle costs,
prevent floods and address the aging of equipment in the sewerage system, as well as tosupport Japanese enterprises’ overseas water business expansion.

Environmental impacts expected from the highly efficient

Highlights heating system (sludge thermal solubilizing equipment)◼ Introduction of the highly efficient heating system (sludge thermal solubilizing

equipment) has reduced moisture content of digested sludge, leading to a
~44% cut in the volume of digested sludge to be discharged and disposed asindustrial waste. The annual volume (5,070 tons) is expected to be reduced by
2,220 tons.
◼ Stirring system for digested sludge was changed to energy-efficientmechanical system from gas-based system, reducing the annual electricity
consumption of the entire facility including the solubilizing equipment (449,000kWh) by 326,000 kWh.

5,070 tons

Sludge fed into
the digestiontank【Annual electricity consumption】

Reduced by ~44％

plant

Reduced by ~73％

Solubilizing
equipment

M(Mixedconcentrated
Sewage treatment
sludge) Digestion tank

449,000kWh

2,850 tons

Biogas power
generator【Sludge thermalsolubilizing equipment】

Solubilized
sludgeCirculated
sludge【Annual discharged sludge volume】

BiogasHighly efficientheating system

Vapor
Small oncethroughboilerCake transfer pump

123,000kWh

Before renovation(2022)

After renovation(2023)

Before renovation(2022)

Discharged sludge

Digested sludge

After renovation(2023)

Dehydrator (existing)41

<Reference> Karatsu City, Saga
DATA
Population

117,373 (as of October 1, 2020)

Area

487.60㎢ (as of July 1, 2023)

Sewerage Coverage

74.5% (as of March 31, 2022)

City Budget

JPY 73.55 billion (FY2023 General Account Initial Budget)

Demographic Trend(1,000 people)★

Overview◼

Karatsu City, Saga is located in the northwestern part of Saga, having goodaccess to neighboring cities such as Fukuoka City and Saga City. With apopulation of about 120,000, Karatsu is the second largest city in Saga. Having
abundant agricultural, livestock farming and fishery resources such as Saga beef,
the city has been thriving with the primary industry by leveraging such resources.

◼

The traditional regional culture, the “Float Ritual (Hikiyama Gyoji) of Karatsu
Kunchi Festival” was registered as a UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage. In
addition, Karatsu-yaki (Karatsu potteries), a very famous traditional craft, has ahistory of about 400 years and still plays an essential role in the industries ofKaratsu City.

◼

"Niji no Matsubara" is a pine grove growing along Karatsu Bay like an arc of
rainbows. The pine trees were originally planted to establish a windproof and tide
prevention grove by Terasawa Shimanokami Hirotaka, the first lord of the
Karatsu Domain. The pine grove stretching for approximately 4.5km in lengthand 500m in width is said to contain about 1 million pine trees. Niji no Matsubara
has been designated as one of the three major pine groves in Japan and as anational special scenic beauty spot.

200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

123

2015

118

2020

113

2025

2030

102

96

90

2035

2040

2045 (Year)*Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Regional Population
Projections for Japan (2018)

Karatsu Castle and wisteria flowers

42

107

Karatsu Bay and Niji no Matsubara(Pine grove of rainbow)