The 52nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
April 21-23, 2016

Contents
Welcome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Schedule
Day 1 (Thursday, April 21, 2016) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Day 2 (Friday, April 22, 2016) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Day 3 (Saturday, April 23, 2016) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Invited talks
Edith Aldridge (University of Washington) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Hans Boas (The University of Texas at Austin) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Anastasia Giannakidou (The University of Chicago) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Caroline Heycock (The University of Edinburgh) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Andrew Nevins (University College London) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Henriëtte de Swart (Universiteit Utrecht): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Sarah Thomason (University of Michigan) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Ming Xiang(The University of Chicago): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
PapersSpecial Session: polarity
Rashad Ullah (Yale University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Osamu Sawada (Mie University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
Luis Alonso-Ovalle (McGill University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Special Session: negation
Kristen Fleckenstein & Suwon Yoon (The University of Texas at Arlington) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
Ricardo Etxepare (CNRS & IKER) & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (UPV/EHU) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Maria-Margarita Makri (University of York) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Paola Cépeda(Stony Brook University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
General Session: tone & intonation
Hyunah Baek (Stony Brook University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Alessandro Jaker (University of Alaska Fairbanks) & Paul Kiparsky (Stanford University) . . . . . . . 24
Eva Zimmermann (Universität of Leipzig) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Jochen Trommer (Universität of Leipzig) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
General Session: morphology & syntax
Zheng Shen (University of Connecticut) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Swetlana Schuster & Aditi Lahiri (University of Oxford) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
John Sylak-Glassman & Ryan Cotterell (Johns Hopkins University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Steven Foley (UC, Santa Cruz) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
General Session: phonology
3Paul Kiparsky (Stanford University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Charlie O’Hara (University of Southern California) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Hayeun Jang (University of Southern California) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron, Michael Wagner & Meghan Clayards (McGill University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
General Session: syntax
Yusuke Imanishi (Kwansei Gakuin University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
David Erschler (University of Massachusetts Amherst) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Despina Oikonomou (MIT) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Wei Song & Masaya Yoshida (Northwestern Univeresity) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Special Session: language contact & endangerement
Itxaso Rodrı́guez (Urbana-Champaign) & Kelsie Gillig (Fort Wayne) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Olga Tararova (University of Toronto) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
William Salmon & Jennifer Gomez Menjivar (University of Minnesota) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Antonia Cristinoi & François Nemo (Université d’Orléans) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Special Session: morphosyntactic features
Boban Arsenijević (University of Niš) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Ksenia Bogomolets (University of Connecticut) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Thuy Bui (University of Massachusetts Amherst) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Dejan Milačić (McGill University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Special Session: historical linguistics
Daniel Lawrence (The University of Edinburgh) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Tim Zingler (University of New Mexico) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Nathan A. Wendte (Tulane University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Jun Chen (Yale University) & Dawei Jin (SUNY at Bufalo) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Zachary O’Hagan (UC, Berkeley) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
General Session: semantics
Jon Ander Mendia (University of Massachusetts Amherst) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Dunja Veselinović (New York University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Patrick Elliott (University College London) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ??
Emily Hanink & Julian Grove (The University of Chicago) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
General Session
Andrew Simpson & Saurov Syed (University of Southern California) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Mark Myslı́n, Roger Levy & Andrew Kehler (UC, San Diego) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
Kunio Kinjo (Rutgers University) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Haj Ross (University of North Texas) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

4

Welcome
Welcome to the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. We are very fortunate
this year to have so many eminent presenters including our invited speakers: Edith Aldridge, Hans
Boas, Anastasia Giannakidou, Caroline Heycock, Andrew Nevins, Henriëtte de Swart, Sarah
Thomason and Ming Xiang.
In all, we have eleven stimulating sessions covering a broad spectrum of current topics, withspecial parasessions on Negation, Polarity, Language Contact & Endangerement, Morphosyntactic
Features and Historical Linguistics.
The conference is being held 21-23 April, 2016, in Ida Noyes Hall at the University of Chicago(1212 East 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637). Registration is at 8:30am the first day last day andat 8:00am the second day, with opening remarks scheduled for 9:45am Thursday. We cordiallyinvite all graduate students to attend our Graduate Student Mixer at 7:30pm Thursday and we
sincerely hope to see everyone at the closing banquet, 6:30pm Saturday, which will feature theever-popular karaoke with some interesting performances.
This year at our book table, CLS is pleased to offer a great assortment of topical books
and journals at discounted prices; publications are from John Benjamins, the MIT Press, theCambridge University Press, the University of Chicago Press and Springer. Also available are
editions of previous CLS proceedings.
Lastly, to our invited speakers, all presenters and attendees, welcome, thank you for coming,and enjoy the conference!

5

Schedule
Day 1 Schedule (Thursday, April 21)
All events held in Ida Noyes Hall (1212 E. 59th St.).
Invited talks, Registration & Polarity Session: Theater, 3rd floor
Left column: Theater, 3rd floor

8:30-9:45
9:45-10:00
10:00-11:00
11:00-11:15
11:15-11:45
11:45-12:15
12:15-12:45
12:45-1:45
1:45-2:45
2:45-3:00
3:00-3:30

3:30-4:00

4:00-4:15
4:15-4:45

Right column: Library, 1st floor

Registration
Opening Remarks
Invited Speaker: Anastasia Giannakidou (The University of Chicago)
The myth of exhaustivity for all NPIs
break
Special Session: Polarity
Rashad Ullah (Yale):
Polarity, free choice, and referential vagueness: evidence from Bengali
Osamu Sawada (Mie):
The Japanese negative totemo ‘very’: toward a new typology of negative-sensitive items
Luis Alonso-Ovalle (McGill):
Spanish siquiera in the even landscapelunch
Invited Speaker: Henriëtte de Swart (Universiteit Utrecht)
Reference to and via properties: a cross-linguistic perspective
breakSpecial Session: Negation
General Session: Tone & Intonation
Kristen Fleckenstein & Suwon Yoon Hyunah Baek (Stony Brook): A match(UT Arlington): Jespersen’s Cycle and scopeof negation in American Sign Language
Ricardo Etxepare (CNRS/IKER UMR
5478) & Myriam
Uribe-Etxebarria(UPV/EHU): A conspiracy theory of constituent negation

break
Maria-Margarita Makri (York): Exple- Eva Zimmermann (Leipzig): Tone feative negation is might

4:45-5:15

Paola Cépeda (Stony Brook): Against expletive negation: The case of Spanish hastaclauses

5:15-5:30
5:30-6:30
7:30

theoretic approach to Korean intonational
phonology
Alessandro Jaker (Alaska-Fairbanks) &Paul Kiparsky (Stanford): Conjugation
tone mapping in Tetsó˛t’ıné (Yellowknife):
Level ordering and morphologizationtures and underspecification: MorphologicalH-tones in Macuiltianguis Zapotec
Jochen Trommer (Leipzig): The typologyof the OCP and floating tones in Anywa

break
Invited Speaker: Caroline Heycock (University of Edinburgh)
Reconsidering relative constructions
graduate student mixer

6

Day 2 Schedule (Friday, April 22)
All events held in Ida Noyes Hall (1212 E. 59th St.).
Invited talks & Registration: Cloister Club, 1st floor
Left column: West Lounge, 2nd floor

8:00-8:30

8:30-9:00
9:00-9:30

9:30-9:45
9:45-10:15

10:15-10:45

10:45-11:00
11:00-12:00
12:00-2:00
2:00-3:00
3:00-3:15

3:15-3:45

registration
General Session:
General Session
Morphology & Syntax
Phonology
Zheng Shen (UConn): On multi-valued Ns Paul Kiparsky (Stanford): Chain shifts
and Ts in number concord and agreement
Swetlana Schuster & Aditi Lahiri (Oxford): Hidden morphology: Decompositionand processing of German complex nouns

logical typology and logical hierarchies
Steven Foley (UC Santa Cruz): Morphological conspiracies and the nature of Vocabulary Insertion

stress in Harmonic Grammar: Nontransitive
conflation in phonological hierarchies

Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron, Michael
Wagner & Meghan Clayards (McGill):
The effect of production planning locality on
external sandhi: A study in /t/

break
Invited Speaker: Sarah Thomason (University of Michigan)
Sound suppression and sound change
lunch
Invited Speaker: Hans Boas (The University of Texas at Austin)
What you see is not what you get: A frame-semantic analysis of absent words
break
General Session:Special Session:
SyntaxLanguage Contact & Endangerment
Yusuke Imanishi (Kwansei Gakuin): A Itxaso Rodrı́guez (UIUC) & KelsieDavid Erschler (UMass): Sluicing beyond
wh-questions: Exploring and explaining crosslinguistic variation

4:15-4:30
4:30-5:00

Charlie O’Hara (USC): Sonority-based

breakJohn Sylak-Glassman & Ryan Cot- Hayeun Jang (USC): A constraint schema
terell (Johns Hopkins): Contrastive morpho- for the OCP: modeling scalar interactions

derivational account of dependent ergative
case: The instrumental voice in Ixil

3:45-4:15

Right column: East Lounge, 2nd floor

Gillig (Indiana-Fort Wayne): Effects of language contact in pitch-accents: The case ofGernika Basque
Olga Tararova (Toronto): The transfer ofnegative doubling in Chipilo, an Italo-Mexican
community

break
Despina Oikonomou (MIT): Sloppy pro William Salmon & Jennifer Gomez
in Greek: An E-type analysis
Menjivar (Minnesota): Attitudes and endangerment in a Mopan village

5:00-5:30

5:30-5:45
5:45-6:45

Wei Song & Masaya Yoshida (Northwestern): Ellipsis or pro-form: Reconstruction
effects of sluicing in Mandarin Chinese

Antonia Cristinoi & François Nemo
(Université d’Orléans): Language endangerment and lexical erosion: Surveys and solutions

break
Invited Speaker: Edith Aldridge (University of Washington)
φ-Feature competition: A unified approach to the Austronesian Extraction Restriction

7

Day 3 Schedule (Saturday, April 23)
All events held in Ida Noyes Hall (1212 E. 59th St.).
Invited talks & Registration: Theater, 3rd floor
Banquet: Cloister Club, 1st floor
Left column: West Lounge, 2nd floor

8:30-9:00

9:00-9:30

Right column: East Lounge, 2nd floor

registration
Special Session:Special Session:
Morphosyntactic Features
Historical Linguistics
Boban Arsenijević (Niš): Gender, like Daniel Lawrence (Edinburgh): Resistance

9:30-10:00

classifiers, marks uniform atomicity: Evidence
from Serbo-Croatian
Ksenia Bogomolets (UConn): Two contrasts are better than one: [±realis] and[±affirmative] in Arapaho

10:00-10:15
10:15-10:45

break
Thuy Bui (UMass): Number agreement in Nathan A. Wendte (Tulane): Language
languages with two hierarchies

10:45-11:15

Dejan Milačić (McGill): Two types of dual
number

11:15-11:45

Emily

Hanink&JulianGrove(Chicago): German relative clauses and thesevered index hypothesis

11:45-12:00
12:00-1:00
1:00-2:00
2:00-2:30

2:30-3:00

6:30

Stages ofgrammaticalization as an explanation ofdisharmonic suffixes in Turkishchange among Louisiana creoles in Southeast
Texas
Jun Chen (Yale) & Dawei Jin (SUNY Buffalo): Meaning change from superlatives todefinite descriptions: A semantic perspective
Zachary O’Hagan (UC Berkeley): Negation in proto-Kampan

tionalizing at least some determiners(USC): On the DP/NP status of nominal projections in Bangla: Consequences for the theory of phases

Dunja Veselinović (NYU): Structural dif-

Mark Myslı́n, Roger Levy & Andrew
Kehler (UC San Diego): Comprehenders infer influences of discourse intent and speakerknowledge state on linguistic form

break
Patrick Elliott (UCL): Explaining DPs vs. Kunio Kinjo (Rutgers): Antiagreement as
CPs without syntax

3:45-4:15
4:15-4:30
4:30-5:30

Tim Zingler (New Mexico):

break
Invited Speaker: Andrew Nevins (University College London)
Towards a morphopragmatic characterization of duals and paucals
lunch
General Session: Semantics
General Session
Jon Ander Mendia (UMass): Conven- Andrew Simpson & Saurov Syedferences between epistemic and root modality:
Evidence from BCS

3:00-3:15
3:15-3:45

to phonetic change in York, Northern Englandintervention

Haj Ross (North Texas): Take that!
break
Invited Speaker: Ming Xiang (The University of Chicago)
Locality and anti-locality in the comprehension of wh-in-situ constructions
banquet8Invited Speakers
Anastasia Giannakidou is Professor of Linguistics in the Department of Linguistics at The
University of Chicago and The College and Co-Director of the Center for Gesture, Sign and Language
at The University of Chicago. She received her Ph.D. in 1997 from the University of Gröningen
under the supervision of Frans Zwarts and Jack Hoeksema. Her dissertation entitled The landscapeof polarity items offered an innovative approach to the licensing and sensitivity of polarity items
from a crosslinguistic perspective and won the Dissertation Award of the Linguistics Associationof the Netherlands for the best dissertation in Linguistics in 1997. Her research interests focus on
semantics, the syntax-semantics, semantics-pragmatics, and semantics-morphology interface from acrosslinguistic perspective. Her research topics include negation, polarity items, free choice, modality
and temporality and she has worked on an extensive number of languages, including Modern
Greek, Dutch, Spanish, Catalan, French, Korean and Mandarin among others. Her recent word(in collaboration with Alda Mari) has focused on the subjunctive and future in Modern Greek and
Italian. Her research has appeared in numerous prestigious journals, including Language, Natural
Language and Linguistic Theory and Journal of Semantics.
Henriëtte de Swart is Professor of French Linguistics and Semantics in the Department of
Languages, Literature and Communication of Universiteit Utrecht and the Utrecht Institute of
Linguistics OTS. She is also Academic Director of the Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics(LOT). She received her Ph.D. from the University of Gröningen with a dissertation investigating
adverbs of quantification from the perspective of generalized quantification. Her research focuseson crosslinguistic variation in meaning and she has published extensively on topics such as aspect
and tense, negation and bare nominals and indefinites. Within the field of semantics she has beenclosely involved in the development of bidirectional optimality theory (OT) as a means to investigate
language evolution. Bidirectional OT features extensively in her work as exemplified by her 2010
book Expression and interpretation of negation: an OT typology.
Caroline Heycock is Professor of Syntax in the Department of Linguistics and English Language in the School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences of The University of Edinburgh.
She received her Ph.D. in 1991 from the University of Pennsylvania with a dissertation entitled Layers
of predication: The non-lexical syntax of clauses. Her work is in the area of theoretical syntax, andin particular reconstruction phenomena, copular constructions and the compositionality of nominal
conjunction and relies on data form English and other Germanic Languages as well as Japanese. Her
recent work includes a project investigating variation and change in the syntax of Faroese. She isa member of the editorial board for many prestigious journals, including Linguistic Inquiry, Lingua
and Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics.
Sarah G. Thomason is the William J. Gedney Collegiate Professor of Linguistics at the
University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. She received her Ph.D. in Linguistics from Yale University
in 1968. Her recent work has focused on Salishan linguistics, principles of contact-induced languagechange, and the genesis of contact languages (such as pidgins, creoles, and mixed languages). Her
publications include the highly influential Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics (withTerrence Kaufman, University of California Press, 1988), as well as Language contact: an introduction(Edinburgh University Press & Georgetown University Press, 2001), ‘Chinook Jargon in areal andhistorical context’ (Language, 1983), and ‘Language contact and deliberate change’ (Journal of
Language Contact, 2007). Since 1981 she has also worked with the Salish & Pend d’Oreille Culture
Committee in St. Ignatius, Montana, compiling a dictionary and other materials for the Salish-Pend
9

d’Oreille language program.
Hans C. Boas is the Raymond Dickson, Alton C. Allen, and Dillon Anderson Centennial
Professor in the Department of Germanic Studies and the Department of Linguistics at the Universityof Texas at Austin, where he is also the Director of the Linguistics Research Center, German
FrameNet, and the Texas German Dialect Project. He received his Ph.D. in Linguistics from the
University of South Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2000. The topic of his dissertation was Resultative
Constructions in English and German. His work has encompassed a considerable range of topics,
including the syntax/semantics/pragmatics interface, computational lexicography, language variation,
language contact and death, multilingualism and language policy, morpho-phonology, and language
and law. In 2011, he was the recipient of the Leonard Bloomfield Book Award from the Linguistic Society of America, for his 2009 book, The life and death of Texas German (Duke University Press).
Edith Aldridge is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University ofWashington. Her Cornell University dissertation looked at ergativity and word order in Austronesianlanguages, which remain core constituents of her research to the present day. She has also mademajor contributions to the comparative and historical syntax of Chinese and Japanese, particularly
with regard to wh-movement, reflexives, focus, and control. Her recent work looks at case, agreement,
and the diachronic emergence of syntactic ergativity, drawing on her own fieldwork on Tagalog andthe Formosan languages of Taiwan.
Andrew Nevins is Professor of Linguistics in the Division of Psychology and Language Sciences and the Faculty of Brain Sciences at University College London. He received his PhD from the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is broadly interested in morphological and phonologicaltheory, often from the perspective of Distributed Morphology. Within morphology, he has done
pathbreaking work on the markedness and morphotactics of person and number. Within phonology,
he has looked at whistled languages, reduplication, and the crosslinguistic behaviour of fricative
patterning. Some of his other interests include conjunction, ergativity, diminutives, and experimental
approaches to syncretism.
Ming Xiang is Assistant Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Chicago,
where she is also the Principal Investigator of the Language Processing Lab. She earned her doctorate
at Michigan State University for her work on comparative constructions. Her current research
programme lies at the interface of syntax, semantics, and psycholinguistcs and aims to characterise
the neural underpinnings of the real-time construction of linguistic representations. More specificinterests include the processing of scalar implicature, gradable adjectives, long-distance dependencies,
ellipsis, and temporal connectives, which she investigates using a variety of experimental paradigms,
to include web-based studies, eyetracking, and ERP measurement.

10Invited Talks
The myth of exhaustivity for all NPIs
Anastasia Giannakidou (The University of Chicago)
Thursday, 10:00-11:00, Theater
In this presentation, I want to assess Chierchia (2006, 2013)’s claim that all NPIs are exhaustive.
According to Chierchia, “in contrast to ordinary or plain indefinites, with NPIs and FCIs we have to
exhaustify” (Chierchia (2013:8), emphasis in the original). Exhaustification is an axiom of polarity, i.e.
it is stipulated for all NPI/FCI classes without empirical justification— and imposes no variation forP
NPIs and FCIs since they are all assumed to contain the [+ ] exhaustive feature (see also Chierchia& Liao (2015) for Mandarin shenme)
P
In assessing the exhaustivity for all position, I establish six diagnostics, i.e. properties that [+ ]bearing NPIs such as any exhibit. I then set out to check whether GreekPkanénas NPIs, Korean -rato
NPIs, and Mandarin shenme exhibit the established properties of the[+ ]-bearing any. We will findcontrasting behavior between any and these NPIs in every single case. Any, on the one hand, andshenme/rato NPIs and kanénas, therefore, cannot be the same kind of NPI. We conclude therefore
that the exhaustivity for all position has no empirical grounding. Exhaustivity for these NPIs cannot
be maintained without compromising empirical adequacy.
P
A Chierchia theorist might try to downplay the implication of this finding by holding on to [+ ]— as expected, since it characterizes axiomatically all NPI and FCI classes in that system — while
conceding that shenme/rato NPIs might behave differently because of other factors. But if we acknowledge other factors, then we have given up the no variation position, indeed as I argue we need todo. If the account can be augmented with constraints that derive the observed properties of shenme(referential vagueness and dependent P
variable; Giannakidou & Quer 2013, Giannakidou & Yoon 2016),
that would mean either giving up [+ ] for non-exhastive NPIs — whichPis precisely what I am arguing for — or counteracting it by additional rules which would render [+ ] inactive, thus begging thequestion of why posit it in the first place. In either case, the exhaustivity and nothing else position
can clearly not be maintained.
More conspicuously, the study of the NPI exhibited by kanenas, shenme and -rato NPIs shows that
constraints on the interpretation of variables play a broader role in grammar, since they appear to be
decisive in a number of polarity items crosslinguistically. This is a good result for syntax-semantics.
As for polarity in particular, the difference between the any-type and the non-exhaustive NPI typeshows that no empirically adequate understanding of NPIs can be achieved if we assume a non-existentunifying property of all NPIs — ignoring thereby the class of non-exhaustive NPIs, or trivializing thedifferences between these and the exhaustive NPIs and FCIs.

11

Reference to and via properties: a cross-linguistic perspective
Henriëtte de Swart (Utrecht Universiteit)
Thursday, 1:45-2:45, Theater[joint work with Louise McNally & Veronika Richtarcikova (Universitat Pompeu Fabra)]
Cross-linguistically, there is a strong generalization that nouns contribute the core descriptive content
for phrases that are used for reference (the table, every meeting, their happiness). Adjectives do thesame for phrases that are used for property ascription (the very happy child, the strawberries are
sweet). Adjectives used to refer to human beings (the rich and famous) have been the subject of someinvestigation, but this talk is primarily concerned with the more unusual configuration in which whatlooks like an adjective contributes the core descriptive content of a phrase that is used for reference toconcrete or abstract objects. McNally & de Swart (2015) illustrate with the following Dutch examples:(1)

Ze moeten wennen aan al het nieuwe, al het vreemde dat dit land hen biedt.
they must get-used to all the new[+e] all the strange[+e] that this land them offers‘They must get used to everything new, everything strange that this land offers them.’(2)

Het bittere van het bier is een mooi contrast met het zoete
van de mout.
the bitter[+e] of the beer is a nice contrast with the sweet[+e] of the malt
‘The bitter (aspect) of the beer is a nice contrast with the sweet (aspect) of the malt.’

Both examples involve the neuter definite article het, the long form of the adjective (with a schwa),
and lack an overt nominal core. McNally & de Swart (2015) argue that, despite these similarities,(1) and (2) involve two different constructions, each with their own meaning. They assign (1) a freerelative semantics in which all het vreemde refers to ‘that which is strange.’ As bittere and zoete in(2) refer to particular aspects of the beer and the malt respectively, they get a relational semantics(similar to a trope, see Moltmann (2004)).
When we turn to other languages, we observe considerable variation in the constructions used torefer to (2) and via properties (1). The English counterpart of (2) for instance, is more likely to
involve a deadjectival noun like bitterness, sweetness. Even though Dutch has a nominalizing suffix-heid, similar to -ness, the language maintains a difference in meaning between het zoete/het bittereand de zoetheid/de bitterheid: the derived nominal has the more specialized meaning of reference to thedegree of sweetness or bitterness. These observations raise new questions about the way competition
between forms correlates with differences in compositional semantics. The goal of this talk is tocontribute to a systematic description of this variation and explore its theoretical relevance.
We build on observations made by Giannakidou & Stavrou (1999) for Greek, Lauwers (2008) for
French, Villalba (2009) for Spanish, Arsenijević (2011), Alexiadou & Iordǎchioaia (2013) for German
and Romanian, Glass (2014) for English, and enrich them with English, French, Spanish, German andSerbian data extracted from corpora and the internet. We show that the definite determiner inventory,
the syntax of free relatives and the productivity of noun-forming derivational morphology shed lighton the counterparts of (1) and (2) across languages. We present the beginnings of a cross-linguistic
semantics.

12

Reconsidering relative constructions
Caroline Heycock (The University of Edinburgh)
Thursday, 5:30-6:30, Theater
Reconstruction effects — such as the binding of the reflexive in (1) — have played a large part in thediscussion of the correct analysis of relatives (and vice versa).
(1)

I noticed the portrait of herselfi that every studenti had pinned up on the wall.

Evidence concerning the distribution of these effects has been used to argue for a head-raising
analysis of relatives, or for the necessity to postulate both a raising and a matching analysis. For
example, it has been observed that there are differences between the effects that are observed inrelatives and those documented for questions; in particular relatives exhibit more “antireconstruction”
effects, as illustrated for example by the lack of a Condition C effect in (2):(2)

I bought the picture of Joannai that shei likes.

This kind of difference has been used to motivate the dual route for the derivation of relatives,with both head-raising (to explain the possible reconstruction in (1)) and matching (to explain theantireconstruction in (2)) available.
In this talk I will present data which show that even with the greater degree of freedom that sucha dual route allows, predictions concerning the kind of trapping effects that were crucial to arguingfor reconstruction as a syntactic phenomenon in questions are not borne out in relatives.
I will then sketch a possible line of analysis, developed in collaboration with Gary Thoms, thataims to demonstrate that it is nevertheless possible to maintain an account in terms of syntactic
reconstruction, if particular — independently motivated — assumptions are made about the natureof complementation within nominals.

13Sound suppression and sound change
Sarah Thomason (University of Michigan)
Friday, 11:00-12:00, Theater[joint work with Kenneth S. Olson (SIL International)]This paper explores the phenomenon of sound suppression and its most striking result: the loss of the
suppressed sounds from a language’s phonemic inventory and phonetic repertoires.
People, as individuals and as speech communities, sometimes change their language deliberately.
Deliberate changes are by no means confined to lexical innovations; they also affect language structure
at all levels — phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and discourse. Motives for making
deliberate changes vary, but language contact is (almost?) always a factor. Some changes result froma community’s effort to distance their language from another language or dialect that is very closely
related; another common motive is to withhold the community’s full language from outsiders, as in
the case of certain pidgins created by speakers of the lexifier language. Still another motive is to
standardize a language by codifying one dialect as the sole acceptable way of speaking (and writing)the language. The main focus of this paper is a different motive for making deliberate changes: thesuppression of stigmatized sounds as a way of avoiding ridicule or even censure. This may be arather common phenomenon in languages of the world; certainly it is more common than is generally
recognized, and in at least some languages the end result of the process is the complete loss of thestigmatized sounds. The examples to be discussed are drawn from (among other languages) a groupof Bantu languages, Teotepeque Pipil, several languages spoken in the Philippines, and Pirahã.

14

What you see is not what you get: A frame-semantic analysis of absent words
Hans Boas (The University of Texas at Austin)
Friday, 2:00-3:00, Theater
Most accounts of word meanings rely on overt lexical material in order to arrive at classifications
based on a variety of criteria, such as syntactic alternations (Levin 1993), lexical relations (Fellbaum1998), qualia structure (Pustejovsky 1995), conceptual structure (Jackendoff 1990), or semantic primes(Wierzbicka 1996). While these approaches are for the most part well suited to characterize different
aspects of word meaning in a systematic way, I argue that they are ill equipped to represent andaccount for meanings of words that are not overtly mentioned. Consider the example The presents
were under the tree, uttered in the context of a larger story involving presents. There is no mentioningof the actual event place, yet everyone familiar with the concept of Christmas will know exactly what
scenario is described by the sentence, including the date, the time, the people involved, as well as theirhopes and expectations.
This talk presents an analysis of the meanings of absent words based on semantic frames as developed by Fillmore (1985). The first part of the talk discusses several different examples involving theunderstanding and interpretation of nouns in a variety of contexts, including a number of idiosyncratic
usages of verbs that allow nouns to be left out in specific types of discourse (e.g. Kim drank too much
/ Kim ate too much / Kim chewed too much / Kim swallowed too much). The second part of thetalk introduces the principles of Frame Semantics as developed by Fillmore and associates during the
1980s and 1990s. The third part of the talk shows how FrameNet (Fillmore & Baker 2010) analyzes
different types of null instantiation (Fillmore 1986). The final part of the talk discusses a numberof different grammatical constructions sensitive to lexically-specified properties regarding the possible
omission of nouns in specific contexts.

15φ-Feature competition: A unified approach to the Austonesian Extraction Restriction
Edith Aldridge (University of Washington)
Friday, 5:45-6:46, Theater
In Philippine and Formosan languages, verbal inflection changes according to which DP in the clausehas nominative case. In the following Tagalog examples, the perfective aspect infix humi appears when
the subject has nominative case, as in (1a). The perfective infix is hini when an internal argument
in a transitive clause has nominative case, as in (1b). Non-nominative DPs receive inherent genitive
case.
(1)

a.

b.

Bhumiiliang babae ng tela sa Maynila.
hsu.prvibuy nom woman gen cloth in Manila‘The woman bought (some) cloth in Manila.’
Bhiniiling babae ang tela sa Maynila.
hob.prvibuy gen woman nom cloth in Manila‘The woman bought the cloth in Manila.’

The nominative argument is also the only DP able to undergo A’-extraction. The nominative subject
can be extracted when the verb has humi marking, as in (2a). A nominative internal argument canbe extracted when the verb takeshini, as in (2b). In contrast, the genitive subject in an hini clausecannot be extracted, as in (2c).
(2)

a.

Sino ang [cp op bhumiili
top ng tela sa Maynila]?
who nom
hsu.prvibuy
gen cloth in Manila‘Who bought (some) cloth in Manila?’b. Ano ang [cp op bhiniili
top ng babae sa Maynila]?
what nomhobv.prvibuy
gen woman in Manila‘What did the woman buy in Manila?’c. *Sino ang [cp op bhiniili
top ang tela sa Maynila]?
who nomhobv.prvibuy
nom cloth in Manila‘Who bought cloth in Manila?’

In this presentation, I propose that the strict locality observed between DPs in languages like Tagalog
is the consequence of [uφ] being the sole probe driving DP movement in these languages. Since [uφ]is the only feature triggering movement, there is no need for features to be inherited by T (contra
Chomsky 2008), with the consequence that no separation of C and T takes place and these languages
lack the A/A’ partition.
Accounting for the examples in (2), the external argument in (2a) checks nominative case by valuing[uφ] on C. The subject also checks the EPP on C/T and moves to the specifier of this projection,
though non-operator subjects are spelled out in their base positions. But object extraction is allowedin (2b), because the external argument has been assigned inherent genitive case. This allows the [uφ]feature on C to probe past the external argument and undergo agree with the object. The genitive
subject is unable to move in (2c), because its case has already been valued and it is not visible to theprobe on C.
I further propose that the [uφ] on C and the lack of C-T Inheritance was a feature of ProtoAustronesian. Starosta et al. (1981), Ross (2009), Aldridge (2016), and others have proposed thatclauses containing nominative objects like (1b) are historically derived from nominalizations, and theergative alignment observed in languages like Tagalog today is the result of this reanalysis. Specifically,
nominative (“absolutive”) case appears on an internal argument when the external argument has
16

genitive (“ergative”) case.
However, the extraction restriction is not limited to those Austronesian languages whose transitive
clauses derive historically from nominalizations or to Austronesian languages with ergative alignment.
For example, Rukai is an accusative language which did not undergo the reanalysis of nominalizations
as verbal clauses. Nevertheless, extraction of internal arguments is only permitted when the externalargument has some type of inherent case and is not nominative. The same is also true in Standard
Indonesian, as well as Chamorro and many other Austronesian languages exhibiting the extraction
restriction. Consequently, this proposal has the potential to offer a unified analysis of DP extraction in
all Austronesian languages that have this restriction, regardless of alignment type or the morphologicalorigins of the nominal and verbal inflections participating in the restriction.

17

Towards a morphopragmatic characterization of duals and paucals
Andrew Nevins (University College London)
Friday, 12:00-1:00, Theater
In order to further develop the theory of features in natural language, a great deal of recent effort
has gone into the semantic characterization of duals and paucals in number systems (for languages
where these are bonafide inflection), in which dual is taken to mean something like ‘exactly two’ andpaucals are as a category approximative number with an upper-bound cutoff. I would like to argue,
however, that attempts at semantic characterizations are incomplete at best until we have begun
to understand the contribution made by pragmatic reasoning, and therefore outline a program ofmorphopragmatic research into these categories, based on collaborative efforts in progress with PaulMarty, Lanko Marušič, Yasu Sudo, and Rok Žaucer. To illustrate the utility of such research, I will
present experimental results that look at the semantics vs pragmatics of the English word “a couple”,
and find that “a couple” semantically means “at least two” and that it is the pragmatics that often
restricts it to mean something like “exactly two” (or “two plus epsilon”). As such, we might revisit thedual, and find that given appropriate controls for pragmatics, its semantics is indeed “at least two”. In
experiments with downward entailing contexts in Slovenian, we find that indeed the dual is compatible
with more than two. Extending work by Farkas & de Swart (2010), I will argue for a principle bywhich the markedness of number morphology matches the markedness of a referential hierarchy, andthat dual, while semantically meaning simply “at least two”, is nonetheless the most morphologicallymost marked, and is thus aligned with usage in situations of exactly two because of competition withthe plural. In fact, this specific implementation makes the prediction that with inherently paired
objects (like shoes), where reference to two is no longer the most marked reference (Tiersma (1982)’s‘local markedness’), the less-marked plural is used — exactly as confirmed in Slovenian. (If the two
shoes are from different pairs, however, then one is back in the referential hierarchy where two is moremarked than more than two, and here the dual is used). Moreover, if indeed dual has a semantics of“at least two”, and it is alignment with morphological markedness that yields exactly two, this could
shed light on the fact that once the dual morphology came to be seen no longer in direct competition
with plural morphology in Slavic, a “paucal” category (2, 3, or 4) arose as an outgrowth or extensionof the dual. It would similarly suggest that paucal categories in languages like Bayso, described inCorbett (2001) as ranging from 2 to 6, have a semantics that is identical to the dual (or trial), namely“at least two”, but with looser pragmatic constraints. Finally, if the paucal has merely an existential,
rather than exact meaning, its pragmatic use in Mebengokre as meaning “some but not all” falls into
place, and I will suggest that the maximality reading in Mebengokre comes from definiteness.

18

Locality and anti-locailty in the comprehension of wh-in-situ constructions
Xiang Ming (The University of Chicago)
Friday, 4:30-5:30, Theater
Much previous processing research has examined wh-fronting languages like English to ask how theindeterminacy of the gap position is resolved in incremental processing of the filler-gap dependency.
In this talk, I look at the similarly challenging inverse problem which has received much less attention— how does the parser identify the correct scope position for a wh-in-situ phrase in a wh-in-situ
languages like Mandarin Chinese? First, I show some of the first experimental evidence from online
processing — both in eyetracking and production studies — for the long-held assumption in thesyntactic literature that a covert syntactic dependency is constructed between the wh-in-situ phrase
and its scope position, which in Mandarin has no morpho-phonological reflex on the surface string.
Second, I illustrate how we have used eyetracking data to distinguish between two possible mechanisms
through which the parser could identify the correct scope position. One possibility is that the parser
serially searches through each intermediate CP position until getting to the right scope position. This
would predict an across-the-board locality bias, and is consistent with the idea of successive cyclic
movement in the theoretical syntax literature. The other possibility is that successful retrieval of thescope position is mediated by simultaneous and parallel access to all CP positions at the same time,
which predicts strong locality in some but not all situations. Our findings provide novel support forthe second hypothesis. Finally, we investigate the relationship between processing complexity andactual comprehension by zooming in on those cases for which processing complexity is greater for the
distant vs. local scope position and probing interpretations. Surprisingly, results from the truth value
judgment task show a clear preference for the high scope interpretation even though associating thewh-in-situ phrase with a distant scope position is more costly, suggesting an important interaction
between parsing complexity and discourse coherence.

19

Papers
Polarity, free choice, and referential vagueness: evidence from Bengali
Rashad Ullah (Yale University)
Thursday, 11:15-11:45, TBA
This paper examines a class of indefinite pronouns in Bengali (k-words) with two aims — first to bringin empirical, descriptive semantic data not previously examined, and secondly to motivate a twodimensional analysis of polarity-sensitivity that depends both on structural licensing and pragmatic
preconditions, which in turn are sensitive to both a domain of alternatives and the extent to whichthat domain is exhaustified. In Bengali, a k-word like kono ‘some/any’ is morphologically composedof an interrogative (kon) along with the particle -o (Chatterji 1926; Thompson 2010). The k-word —with Negative Polarity (NPI) and Free Choice (FCI) readings — has been analysed using alternatives(Ramchand 1997) similar to indeterminates in Japanese (Kratzer & Shimoyama 2002). In previous
work (Ullah 2005) I argue that Bengali k-words divide into emphatics and non-emphatics and thatemphatics are subject to licensing in anti-veridical contexts (cf. Giannakidou 1997, 1998). In thispaper I identify an intonational diagnostic that teases apart emphatics from non-emphatics and thenshow that non-emphatics obtain a referentially vague (RV) reading of the type called “epistemic
indefinites” e.g. algún in Spanish (Alonso-Ovalle 2006). Next, examining interpretations in the scopeof modals, I show that non-emphatic k-words systematically contrast with, on one side, non-polaritysensitive indefinites and, on the other side, FCIs. Giannakidou & Quer (2013) argue that certain FCIand RV indefinites in Spanish, Catalan, and Greek are best explained as requiring preconditions thattrigger individual-alternatives but differ critically in that FC requires exhaustification of the domain
while the RV requires only partial exhaustification. My paper argues that Giannakidou & Quer-type
analysis better explains the Bengali k-words in all three readings — NPI, FCI, and RV. This approach
supports converging work that treats polarity not as a monolithic class but as a cluster of phenomena
emerging from the mix of grammar, semantics, and pragmatics.

The Japanese negative totemo ‘very’: toward a new typology of negative sensitiveelements
Osamu Sawada (Mie University)
Friday, 11:45-12:15, TBA
The Japanese intensifier totemo ‘very’ can intensify the degree associated with a gradable predicate:(1)

Kono ie-wa
totemo ookii.
This house-TOP very
big‘This house is very big.’
However, totemo can also intensify a negative modal statement:(2)

Tetuya-nado
totemo {deki-nai/*dekiru}-daroo.
Staying up all night-NADO very
can-NEG/can-possibly‘Possibly, staying up all night is impossible.’ (Implication: I am emphasizing the impossibility.)

In (2), totemo emphasizes the negative statement that “I can’t stay up all night.” A crucial point of
this use of totemo is that it can only appear in a negative environment (e.g. Watanabe 2001). If there
is no negation, the sentence (2) becomes ill-formed. Therefore, totemo in (2) behaves like a negative20

polarity item (NPI). However, the “negative modal” use of totemo has several puzzling properties
with regard to the NPI-hood. First, it cannot be within the scope of negation. This is supported by
the fact that (2) cannot mean that I am not emphasizing possibility of staying up all night. Second,
unlike typical NPIs (e.g., minimizer NPIs, any-type NPIs), the meaning of totemo is not part of “whatis said.” The denial cannot target the emphasis part triggered by totemo.
In this paper, I will investigate the meaning and distribution of the negative totemo and consider
what a negative totemo suggests for theories of NPIs. I argue that the negative totemo is not alogical NPI (which is licensed by negation or downward-entailing/non-veridical operators (e.g. Klima
1964; Ladusaw 1979; Giannakidou 1998). Rather, it is a conventional implicature (CI)-inducing
expression/expressive (e.g. Grice 1975; Potts 2005), which intensifies the unlikelihood or impossibilityof a given proposition and refuses to update the common ground (the context set) with the at-issue
proposition. This paper proposes a new class of NPIs – discourse-oriented NPIs.

Spanish siquiera in the even landscape
Luis Alonso-Ovalle (McGill University)
Thursday, 12:15-12:45, TBA
Concessive scalar particles (CSPs) are focus sensitive particles restricted to a number of non-veridical
contexts: downward entailing environments, modal environments, and questions. Where do CSPs fit
in the typology of polarity items? How uniform is the class of CSPs, across languages? The paper aims
to contribute to our understanding of the typological space of CSPs by probing into the behaviour of
Spanish siquiera.
Giannakidou (2007) analyzes the Greek CSP esto as a presupposition trigger that conveys a negative
additive presupposition. This analysis does not extend to Spanish siquiera, for reasons already pointed
out for other CSPs in Crnic̆ (2011a,b). As an alternative, focusing on Slovenian magari, which hetakes to be representative of the whole class of CSPs, Crnic̆ analyzes CSPs as Lahiri-style polarity
items, which decompose into even, conveying low likelihood, and a weak existential term that evenassociates with. Crnic̆’s analysis does not extend to Spanish siquiera either, because of significant
distributional and interpretational differences between magari and siquiera.
An alternative analysis of siquiera is proposed. The analysis retains two central insights from Crnic̆’s
proposal: that the interpretation of CSPs makes reference to a set of propositional alternatives andthat CSPs convey truth-conditionally that at least one of these alternatives is true, but it departs
from Crnic̆’s in assuming that the alternatives that siquiera brings into play contribute to a processof obligatory exhaustification.

Jespersen’s Cycle and scope of negation in American Sign Language
Kristen Fleckenstein & Suwon Yoon (The University of Texas at Arlington)
Thursday, 3:00-3:30, TBA
American Sign Language (ASL) uses a combination of manual (signs) and non-manual (negative
headshake) information to express negation. In most instances, negation has been believed to bestrictly external and marked by a negative headshake with an optional manual negation marker.
Recent research (Pfau 2015) suggests that the pattern of negation in ASL has arisen as the result ofJespersen’s Cycle, where the negative headshake replaces the original head of NegP, manual negation.
The present paper confirms that the headshake has grammaticalized as the main marker of external
negation, but also proposes that the job of the manual negation marker was not merely weakened
or nullified in the process, contrary to the general assumption in the literature. In exploring these21

patterns of negation, we show that asymmetries exist between the two negative markers, suggestingthat manual negation has been reanalyzed as a type of internal negation.

A conspiracy theory of constituent negation
Ricardo Etxepare (CNRS/IKER UMR 5478) & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (UPV/EHU)
Thursday, 3:30-4:00, TBA
In this paper we analyze a variety of cases involving sequences of Negation+QuantifierP that havebeen descriptively characterized as constituent negation (CN) in Spanish. We show that sequences of
Neg+QP sequences do not uniformly map into syntactic terms (in the sense of Chomsky (1995)), andmay display very different syntactic and semantic properties. In particular, while some of them reflectinstances in which the negation particle and the relevant QP are merged together, other sequences
belong in the domain of association with focus, and involve an instance of negation which is higher
than ordinary sentential negation. The adjacency between negation and the quantifier in this casefollows from an independent process of fronting into the left periphery of the sentence. The two
configurations seem to be sensitive to the type of quantifier involved: constituent negation understoodas a syntactic term is a natural structural option for degree quantifiers, but an impossible one for thosequantifiers which do not license a scale. For those cases, the sequence negation+QP must correspondto a different structural option. We argue that those correspond to instances of association with focus
with a structurally high negation and focus fronting of the QP to a projection below negation. This
analysis is supported by different types of evidence, involving the relative order of so called constituent
negation and sentential adverbs, scope relations with regard to modal predicates, co-occurrence withovert sentential negation, and locality constraints typical of focus movement. We argue that the
distributional differences in constituent negation across languages follow from more basic differences,
concerning the syntactic status of negation, its structural position, independent restrictions on focus
movement or other types of discourse related movements, and the semantic nature of the quantifier.

Expletive negation is might
Maria-Margarita Makri (University of York)Thursday, 4:15-4:45, TBA
Emotive doxastics, inquisitive predicates, negated veridical responsive predicates, dubitatives andnegative predicates may select for sentential complements with Expletive Negation (EN). In thispaper I identify some new necessary conditions for EN-licensing and I show that EN has the meaningof a weak epistemic modal.
Condition I. As different diagnostics show (availability of morphological tense alternations, availability of two temporal adverbs with distinct reference, licensing of an embedded subject), EN isgrammatical in complements with free or dependent tense but ungrammatical in complements with
anaphoric tense. Assuming Grano (2012)’s syntactic analysis of Tense, this correlation indicates that
EN scopes above TP.
Condition II. Based on current analyses of emotive doxastics, dubitatives (Anand & Hacquard2013), rogative predicates (Uegaki 2012), and negative predicates (White et al. 2014), I argue that
EN is selected only by predicates that select for complements of type hhs, ti, ti and that introduce abipartition of the doxastic alternatives of the epistemic subject (i.e. they have existential force ∃ or¬∀).
Assymmetries between EN and that-complements. I show that EN is in complementary
distribution with epistemic modals, that EN can render a sentence to an infelicitous answer and thatmatrix negation can target the desirability ordering introduced by an emotive doxastic only in the22

presence of EN. Furthermore, a predicate like say can have a different flavor depending on whether
EN is present in its clausal complement.
The proposal. I argue that these new puzzles can only be explained if we assume that EN has
the import of a weak epistemic modal, which marks the doxastic alternatives of the attitude holder
as equally likely.
(1)

a.
b.
c.

ϕ >LIKELY ¬ϕϕ ≥LIKELY ¬ϕ
ϕ =LIKELY ¬ϕthat-complement
EN-complement(cancellable) scalar implicature triggered by EN

Corroborative evidence that EN has the meaning of a weak epistemic comes from Modern Greek
counterfactuals where EN can be used instead of epistemic tha (will).

Against expletive negation: The case of Spanish hasta-clauses
Paola Cépeda (Stony Brok University)
Thursday, 4:45-5:15, TBA‘Expletive negation’ is a label traditionally used to describe a vacuous negation that does not contributeto the meaning of the sentence. Under this assumption, Spanish punctual hasta-clauses (‘until’)containing an expletive negation have been described as identical in meaning with their counterparts
without a negation. In this talk, I show that the negation in the hasta-clause does in fact contributeto the meaning calculation and, therefore, there is no support to describe this negation as expletive.
My proposal is that the semantic contribution of the so-called ‘expletive’ negation is to negate thatthe eventuality in the main clause holds during the interval denoted in the hasta-clause, and restricts
the factivity inference (i.e. the inference that the eventuality has to hold) to the complement of thatinterval. The result is that the eventuality in the main clause is expected to hold after the eventuality
in the hasta-clause is finished. The novelty of my proposal is the comparison of the aspect (specifically,
the durativity component) of the eventualities expressed in the hasta-clause. When the hasta-clausecontains an accomplishment (i.e. a telic, durative eventuality), the contribution of the negation isclear. However, when the hasta-clause contains an achievement (i.e. a telic, non-durative eventuality),
the effect of the negation is not so evident, and this is precisely what creates an illusion of expletiveness.
This discussion supports the claim that the truth conditions for sentences with and without ‘expletive’
negation are not identical; therefore, it is safe to say that the ‘expletive’ negation is not expletive afterall.

A match-theoretic approach to Korean intonational phonology
Hyunah Baek, (Stony Brook University)
Thursday, 3:00-3:30, TBA
The distinction between the intermediate phrase (IP, or major phrase) and the accentual phrase (AP,or minor phrase) has been suggested in literature to account for prosody of Korean. The empiricalobservations that call for an intermediate prosodic domain were the domain of phonetic downstep andthe domain of focus, which are not explained by AP alone (Jun 2006). Although ip is a descriptively
useful label, whether such an additional language-specific category is necessary in the system of intonation phonology is still debatable. Moreover, having this distinction in some languages but not inothers runs counter to cross-linguistic prosody research. If one assumes the Strict Layer Hypothesis,
which strictly prohibits recursion of prosodic domain, positing an intermediate domain IP would be
inevitable. However, once recursion of prosodic categories is allowed, the motivation for adding IP to23

the prosodic hierarchy needs to be reconsidered. In Match Theory recursive syntactic constituency
results in recursion in prosody due to Match correspondence constraints such as match (Phrase,
Phonological phrase). Within the framework of this theory, this study shows that Korean prosodic
hierarchy does not need the IP because a) the domain of phonetic downstep can be explained as a
non-minimal maximal phonological phrase in a syntactically grounded prosodic hierarchy, and b) the
domain of focus can be explained as the result of prosodic markedness constraints such as prospprom(ap) and destress given outranking match constraints. This approach allows the removalof an unnecessary language-specific prosodic category so as to maintain and thus further establish alanguage-universal prosodic hierarchy.

Conjugation tone mapping in Tetsó˛t’ıné (Yellowknife): Level ordering and morphologization
Alessandro Jaker (University of Alaska Fairbanks) & Paul Kiparsky (Stanford University)
Thursday, 3:30-4:00, TBA
Dene (Athabaskan) languages are widely known for their complex templatic morphology and opaquemorphophonemics. In this paper, we examine a group of related phonological processes in the Northeast Dene language Tetsó˛t’ıné (Yellowknife), known as conjugation tone mapping, in which theassociation of an underlying floating high tone is sensitive both to metrical foot structure and morphological boundaries. This group of tone-related processes spans a total of four serially ordered strata inthe phonology of the language, and ranges from fully morphologized (Level 2) to fully phonologicallytransparent (Level 5), with intermediate levels involving surface phonological opacity (Level 4) andlexically pre-specified foot structure (Level 3). We argue that the framework of Stratal Optimality
Theory, or LPM-OT (Kiparsky 2000) is the only model of phonology able to explain these facts ina coherent manner, and is preferable to alternatives such as harmonic serialism because it provides
a straightforward account of diachronic pathways of phonologization and morphologization, which is
not available under other models.

Tone features and underspecification: Morphological H-tones in Macuiltianguis
Zapotec
Eva Zimmermann (Universität Leipzig)
Friday, 4:15-4:45, TBA
Macuiltianguis Zapotec (=MZ, Broadwell & Zhang 1999; Broadwell 2000; Broadwell et al. 2011;
Foreman 2006) exhibits two different classes of morphological H-tones that are realized in different
positions and differ in whether they create new contour tones on long vowels or not. The potential
H-tone is always realized on the TBU adjacent to the potential prefix /gu-/ and results in a falling
contour on long L-toned vowels (e.g. Base: /sı̀:gáP/ → /gú-sı̂:gáP-nà-nà/ ‘S/he will push it’ (Broadwell
et al. 2011: 4). The 1.Sg H-tone, on the other hand, is realized non-locally (preferably on a vowel
followed by /P/, or an an L-toned TBU) and overwrites a long vowel to a completely H-toned one(e.g. Base: /SuPnı́/ → /be-SúPnı́-já-nà/ ‘I wrinkled it’, (Broadwell et al. 2011: 6).
The asymmetric behaviour of morphological H-tones follows under the assumption that the tones
in MZ are represented as complex structures of register and tone in a dominance relation (cf. (4), Yip
1989; Snider 1990; Hyman 1992). The morphological H-tones are taken to have different complexity:
they are either specified for the register feature [+Upper] and the tone feature [+raised] or only for[+raised]. A structure [+U – +r] associates to a TBU and a contour tone for long vowels results (1).
Although there are preferences to realize a high tone on vowels followed by a /P/ and to preferably
overwrite L-tones rather than M-tones, this fully specified H-tone is unable to reach any of these24preferred positions across intervening tones. An underspecified floating [+r], on the other hand, isable to cross intervening tones on its way to a preferred position. Since the two moras of a long vowel
are associated to a single register feature [±U], association of the floating [+r] to this [+U] changes
the tone specification for both TBU’s and no contour tone results (2).
+r

-r

+r

+U

-U
=

μ μ
(1)

+U

-r
=
+U

+U

μ

μ μ

μ

s i g a P

+r

(2)

+r

S u P n i

The typology of the OCP and floating tones in Anywa
Jochen Trommer (Universität Leipzig)
Saturday, 15:30-16:00, TBA
Outline: In this talk, I show that floating H-tones in Anywa (Western-Nilotic, Reh 1996) induce
L-tone insertion before other H-tones, filling an important gap in the typology of effects that can betriggered by floating phonological features and providing additional evidence for a relativized notion of
adjacency in OCP-effects (Odden 1994; Myers & Carleton 1996). I provide a detailed OT-analysis of
the data which accounts for the asymmetries of floating tones in spreading and dissimilation (‘polarity’)at different morphoprosodic boundaries.
Data: H-tones in Anywa trigger two effects at morpheme boundaries: Rightwards-spreading toa L-tone syllable (/ká:(:)t-Ò/ ‘weave:sth:there-INF’ → [ká:(:)t-Ó]) and insertion of a L-tone before
another H-tone resulting in a rising tone in a monosyllabic and a H-L sequence in a bisyllabic prosodic
word (/´υ-máθ-à/ → [´υ-máθ-á] HAB-drink:AP- 1SG ‘whenever I drink’). Crucially, both processes
also happen after lexical floating H-tones which appear at the end of many L-tone syllables.
Consequences: The Anywa data fill two important typological gaps: First, virtually all cases oftone polarity discussed in the theoretical literature (e.g. Cahill 2004) instantiate alternations wherestem tones trigger polarity on affixes. The Anywa case shows a polarity pattern with the opposite
distribution: Prefixes trigger H- tone in roots starting with L-tones, and L-tone insertion in L-initialroots. Second, these data complement the known inventory of OCP-effects triggered by floating tones,
where floating tones are typically deleted to avoid an OCP-violation or block otherwise expected OCPeffects. Anywa exemplifies a third option: a floating tone triggers an OCP-driven repair operation
without being itself affected.

On multi-valued Ns and Ts in number concord and agreement
Zheng Shen (University of Connecticut)
Friday, 8:30-9:00, West Lounge, 2nd floor
I present an asymmetry regarding multi-valuation in (1) and offer an agree based account. I use
nominal right node raising in (2) as a case of multi-valued N and TP right node raising in English (3)and composed plural in Nocte as cases of multi-valued T.
(1)

Multi-Value Asymmetry: When N is valued by multiple [sg] values, it is spelled out as singular,
while when T is valued by multiple [sg] values, it is spelled out as plural.

(2)

This[sg] tall and that[sg] short student[sg] /*students are a couple.

(3)

Sue’s proud that Bill[sg] and Mary’s glad that John[sg] have[pl] traveled to Cameroon.
25

I propose that nominals have one slot for a number feature (4a) while T heads have at least two(4b), following the standard number feature spell-out rules in (5).
(4)
(5)

]
, uNum:a.
b.

N: [uNum:
T: [uNum:a.
b.

[sg] ←→ singular marker[sg, sg] ←→ plural marker]

In cases of a multi-valued N, the single slot on N matches with both the num heads. In valuation,
only the value from one of the two num heads can be copied into the single slot on N. Since in (2)both the values are singular, the choice is trivial and the nominal gets one [sg] and thus is spelled out
as singular. The unavailability of plural marking follows naturally from the lack of multiple num slots
on N.
In cases of a multi-valued T, the values from both subjects can be copied onto T, given that T has
at least two number feature slots. The spell-out rule in (5b) marks T as plural. The proposed featurecomposition of T and N make predictions in cases of multi-valued elements with mismatching goals.

Hidden morphology: Decomposition and processing of German complex nouns
Swetlana Schuster & Aditi Lahiri (University of Oxford)
Saturday, 9:00-9:30, West Lounge, 2nd floor
In psycholinguistic research, the role of morphological decomposition has been studied with regard toits relevance to word recognition. From previous studies (Rastle et al. 2004; Crepaldi et al. 2015), it
does not emerge, however, whether speakers are sensitive to the internal structure of morphologicallycomplex words.
Building on recent studies (cf. Meinzer et al. 2009), showing that speakers are sensitive to thedegree of derivational depth, the research presented in this paper aims to investigate to what extent
speakers are sensitive to degrees of violation to morphological complexity by varying the derivational
distance to an existent lexical representation using phonologically and morphologically possible, but
non-existent (i.e. unlisted) German nouns.
In two lexical decision tasks with delayed priming, it was found that possible, but unlisted pseudonouns that are a single derivation (e.g. *Spitzung (N, ‘sharpening’) — spitzen (V, ‘to sharpen’) —spitz (A, ‘sharp’), as well as items that are two derivations away from an existent lexical representation(e.g. *Blöndung (N, ‘act of becoming blond’) - *blönden (V, ‘to become blond’) — blond (A, ‘blond’)),activated the lexical representation of their base form, unlike any of their form or semantic controls.
In an unprimed lexical decision task to all complex items and their controls, it was found that
*Blöndung was significantly more difficult to classify than *Spitzung, indicating that the existenceof a lexical representation for the intermediate derivation (spitzen versus *blönden) was reflected in
speakers’ treatment of these items.
We therefore argue for an abstract structural representation of morphological complexity thatis independent of lexical representation. At the same time, speakers are sensitive to the internal
composition of a morphologically complex word and therefore the degree of “morphological violation”
expressed in the absence of a lexical representation for an intermediate derivational step.

Contrastive morphological typology and logical hierarchies
John Sylak-Glassman & Ryan Cotterell (Johns Hopkins University)
Friday, 9:45-10:15, West Lounge, 2nd floor26

A central goal of research in morphological typology is to discover a list of categories (e.g. Tense)and features (e.g. Present) that captures the concepts encoded by inflectional morphology across theworld’s languages (Corbett 2012). To that end, we propose a contrastive method of discovering thesemantic concepts encoded as features by inflectional morphology: if a semantic distinction is encoded by two overtly contrasting morphemes in a language and the meaning encoded by at least
one of the morphemes is not decomposed further in any other language, then that non-decomposable
meaning is represented by a feature. This method yields over 212 features across 25 morphologicalcategories across all parts of speech. Previous research (e.g. Harley & Ritter 2002) has argued thatmorphosyntactic features must be organized hierarchically, that such hierarchies are motivated bylanguage-internal dependency relationships observed through co-occurrence patterns, and that thesehierarchies explain typological generalizations and patterns of acquisition. We argue that morphological features, specifically those discovered through the proposed contrastive method, are also organized
into logical hierarchies, which capture specificity relationships among features such that features lower
in the hierarchy are more specific than those that dominate them. The problem that motivates thesehierarchies is morphological feature mismatches between languages with differing distinctions withina morphological category. The specificity relationships encoded by logical hierarchies allow thesemismatches to be resolved during translation and model an element of bi- or multi-lingual speakers’
competence. We explore the relationship between logical and dependency hierarchies, and propose
logical hierarchies for the 25 morphological categories for which features were discovered using the contrastive method. We demonstrate their utility in resolving morphological mismatches across parallel
text, and conclude by discussing their potential explanatory value in other domains.

Morphological conspiracies and the nature of Vocabulary Insertion
Steven Foley (University of California, Santa Cruz)
Friday, 10:15-10:45, West Lounge, 2nd floor
A conspiracy arises when more than one (e.g. phonological) process serves to enforce a single constraint
on surface forms. A major theoretical advantage of an Optimality Theoretic grammar is the ability tocapture conspiracies: instead of relying on otherwise unconnected rules that just happen to prevent
some marked structure, OT allows us to refer directly to it by ranking a markedness constraint above
relevant faithfulness constraints.
In this talk I identify a morphological conspiracy in Georgian, and use it to argue that morphology
is governed by an OT grammar. Again and again, the language’s agreement system goes out of its way
to avoid Multiple Exponence — the presence of more than one morpheme in a word exponing a single
feature. Abstractly, when probes X and Y both Agree with a single argument for feature [F], andmorphemes α and β can spell out [F] on X and Y respectively, multiple exponence of [F] is avoided
by blocking the insertion of either α or β. Within Distributed Morphology (DM; Halle & Marantz
1993), such blocking relationships can be derived through some suite of postsyntactic operations, like
impoverishment. However, these operations do not refer to multiple exponence directly, and thus failto capture the conspiracy.
Instead, building on previous work in OT morphology (Kiparsky 2000, Trommer 2001, Wolf 2008,
Caballero & Inkelas 2013), I propose that Vocabulary Insertion — the operation that chooses whichmorphemes expone which syntactic terminals — is governed by ranked, violable constraints. DM’s
Subset Principle is decomposed into morphosyntactic faithfulness constraints; highly ranked morphosyntactic markedness constraints (like *MultipleExponence) replace DM’s postsyntactic operations. I show that Georgian’s conspiracy against multiple exponence, along with other peculiarities of
its agreement system, follow from standard constraint interactions.
27

Chain shifts
Paul Kiparsky (Stanford University)
Friday, 8:30-9:00, East Lounge, 2nd floor
Formal phonology has studied chain shifts primarily as instances of the problem of counterfeeding
opacity. This talk addresses their diachronic course, specifically that of vowel shifts, and proposes an
explanation of the empirical generalizations subsumed by Labov (1994)’s Exit Principles.
The contrast-preserving property of chain shifts has been accounted for in OT by constraints thatprohibit the mapping of distinct inputs into identical outputs (Padgett 2003, Kawahara 2003). I
adopt a simplified version of the super-optimality constraint (1) (Kiparsky 2011), which dominatesa stringency hierarchy of markedness constraints and a set of faithfulness constraints.
(1) Assign a violation to the Input-Output correspondence hI, Oi if there is an optimal hI 0 , Oi thatis more harmonic than hI, Oi.
This approach unifies the steps of a chain shift as a single change, triggered by a single innovative
constraint ranking. It provides a formal explanation of Labov’s Dissimilation Effect (1994: 254) andUpper Exit Principle (1994: 280), which state that in vowel chain shifts, long high vowels becomelax diphthongs. Beyond that, it predicts, for any featural dimension, what sideways movements may
terminate a chain shift on it: in particular, that back vowel raising, as in Greek and Swedish/Norwegian(Labov’s Pattern 3 shifts), terminates in fronting rather than diphthongization. This raising pattern isdriven by a version of the markedness constraints that applies only to back vowels. A high back vowel
can satisfy them just by fronting, a lesser faithfulness violation than diphthongization and laxing. A
second prediction is that a chain shift can terminate in a merger at the end point of its scale, contrary
to the exit principle. This will be the case when super-optimality is ranked low.
Chain shifts provide a new argument against the A → B/C D format for representing soundchange. They show that not even the process part ( A → B) is necessarily shared by all instantiations ofa sound change. A single constraint reranking can have a range of heterogeneous output manifestations.
Such cases support the view that processes are epiphenomena of constraints and should not be reified
as primitive building blocks of analysis, even in historical phonology.

Sonority-based stress in Harmonic Grammar: Nontransitive conflation in phonological hierarchies
Charlie O’Hara (University of Southern California)
Friday, 9:00-9:30, East Lounge, 2nd floorMarkedness hierarchies are cross-linguistically universal orderings of phonological structures by theirrelative markedness. It stands that, all things being equal, if one item in a hierarchy is bannedin a context, all forms more marked on the hierarchy should also be banned. However, in somegrammars and contexts the distinction between certain tiers in the hierarchy can be lost or conflated(ex. sonority based stress (de Lacy 2004)). With ranked constraints, as in Optimality Theory, onlytransitive conflation is predicted — if Tier 1 and Tier 2 are conflated and Tier 2 and Tier 3 areconflated, Tier 1 and Tier 3 must be conflated as well. In contrast to transitive conflation, we could
imagine nontransitive conflation, where Tier 1 and Tier 2 are conflated and Tier 2 and Tier 3 areconflated, but Tier 1 and Tier 3 are not.
This paper shows that in a system with weighted constraints like Harmonic Grammar (HG: Legendre et al. 1990, 2006; Pater to appear), nontransitive conflation is predicted regardless of theconstraints used to model the markedness hierarchy. In fact, the two techniques most conventionallyused in the OT literature to establish markedness hierarchies — stringently related constraints (Prince
28

1999; de Lacy 2002) and fixed ranking(/weighting) of constraints (Prince & Smolensky 1993/2004,
a.m.o.) — predict the same typologies.

A constraint schema for the OCP: modeling scalar interactions
Hayeun Jang (University of Southern California)
Friday, 9:45-10:15, East Lounge, 2nd floor
This paper examines scalar interactions between proximity and similarity in OCP effects through acase study of Swedish tone patterns. Proximity and similarity both come into play in Swedish tone
dissimilation. When a focal H or ↑H is followed by an unaccented lexical H in an underlying form, thepatterns of dissimilation show a three-way gradient distinction depending on their proximity (Bruce
1977, 1990; Harrikari 1999): the closer two high tones (Hs) are, the less similar they should be.
The traditional OCP (McCarthy 1986) which considers only the endpoints of proximity (adjacent)and similarity (identical) scales cannot explain such gradient OCP effects. In this paper, I propose
an OCP constraint schema that incorporates various degrees of OCP effects referring to continuous
scales. Following the schema, an OCP constraint is formalized as a set of markedness constraints whichshare the constraint focus (two target elements) and the target scales for proximity and similarity. The
scales for proximity and similarity are defined as sets of stringently-defined scalar degrees, and the links
between the two target scales are created via conjunctions across the scales. Markedness constraints as
sub-constraints composing the OCP are defined with conditions of stringently-defined similarity scalardegrees and the conjunctions between similarity and proximity. Through the proposed constraint
schema, the OCP is formalized as a family of OCP constraints which represent various degrees of
OCP effects. Two case studies Swedish and typological predictions by using abstract language inputs
and scales show that the proposed OCP schema can model complex and gradient OCP effects whichcannot be explained by the traditional OCP.

The effect of production planning locality on external sandhi: A study in /t/
Oriana Kilbourn-Ceron, Michael Wagner & Meghan Clayards (McGill University)
Friday, 10:15-10:45, East Lounge, 2nd floor
The intervocalic flapping of English coronal stops /t, d/ is nearly categorical when the VTV sequenceis within a word but variable when a word boundary intervenes, and occurs only rarely across a large
boundary such as a clause edge. This is pattern cross-linguistically common in external sandhi —but why are segmental processes at word edges often more variable, and what influences the rateof variability? Previous literature on phonological variability has proposed that phonological rules
make reference to syntactic structure or that phonological process are tied to prosodic domains. In
contrast, we propose that phonological variability is only indirectly influenced by syntax and prosody
through the locality of production planning. This hypothesis is motivated by psycholinguistic models ofspeech production, and we test its predictions for English flapping in a corpus study and a production
experiment. Results show that syntax may have an effect above and beyond prosodic boundary
strength, and that the lexical frequency of the following word has a significant influence on rate of
flapping, consistent with the lpp hypothesis.

A derivational account of dependent ergative case: The instrumental voice in Ixil
Yusuke Imanishi (Kwansei Gakuin University)
Friday, 3:15-3:45, West Lounge, 2nd floor

29

Focusing on the instrumental voice construction (= ivc) in Ixil (Norman 1978; Dayley 1981; Ayres
1983, 1991), I argue that the unaccusative subject as well as the unergative subject is allowed toreceive ergative case, contra the widely accepted generalization that derived subjects such as the
subject of unaccusatives are not marked with ergative case (Marantz 1991). I show that the ergative
arises in both unergatives and unaccusatives of Ixil when the instrumental phrase is in clause-initial
position. Adopting a recent phase-based analysis of dependent ergative case (Baker 2014, 2015), I
claim that the ergative found in unaccusatives and unergatives as well as the regular ergative of Ixil
can be analyzed as ‘dependent’ ergative: specifically, it is argued that the clause-initial instrument
feeds the assignment of ergative case. The Ixil facts present an important challenge to one strandof analysis of ergative case, namely an inherent case analysis (Woolford 1997, 2006; Aldridge 2004,
2008; inter alia). This analysis proposes that v assigns inherent ergative case to the transitive subjectand (sometimes) the unergative subject in split-S languages along with a specific θ-role in the senseof Chomsky (1986). Despite the complicating picture of the correlation between ergative case and atype of θ-role, as Legate (2012) states, the generalization is that the only v that introduces the externalargument may assign inherent ergative case, regardless of the type of a θ-role it assigns: i.e., transitive
and unergative v. This conclusion is consistent with the ergative case generalization (Marantz
1991). However, the ivc of Ixil challenges the inherent case analysis and calls for reconsideration of
ergativity in the language and in general.

Scluicing beyond wh-questions: Exploring and explaining crosslinguistic variation
David Erschler (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Friday, 3:45-4:15, West Lounge, 2nd floor
While sluicing, (1a), has received much attention in the literature, little is known about other typesof embedded fragment questions, shown schematically in (1b-c). Although ungrammatical in English,
they are common cross-linguistically.
(1)

a.
b.

c.

Sluicing‘Mary cooked something, but I don’t know what.’
Embedded fragment of an alternative question: Or-sluicing
Mary cooked something, but I don’t know whether she cooked rice or beans.
Intended meaning: ‘Mary cooked something, but I don’t know whether she cooked rice orbeans.’
Embedded fragment of a Y/N question: Y/N sluicing
Mary cooked something, but I don’t know whether she cooked rice.
Intended meaning: ‘Mary cooked something, but I don’t know whether she cooked rice.’

In this talk, I show that embedding of fragment questions is subject to cross-linguistic variation thatobeys the following implicational universal, and provide an analysis that derives it.
(a) If a language allows Y/N sluicing, it will also allow or-sluicing and regular sluicing.
(b) If a language allows or-sluicing, it will also allow regular sluicing.
The universal has been verified for about 60 languages, the data were directly elicited from native
speakers. The analysis is based on the following ideas: (A) sluices are derived by fronting the remnant(s) and eliding the rest of the clause; (B) ellipsis is feature-triggered; (C) the head that hosts
the licensing feature agrees with the head whose complement gets deleted; (D) it is the content of
the feature that is responsible for the observed hierarchy. Informally speaking, the three types ofquestion vary in the number of appropriately defined relevant exhaustive answers, which equals 1 for30

Y/N questions, equals the number of disjuncts for Alt-questions, and is unbounded for wh-questions.
Appropriately formalized, the minimal admissible number of answers to the embedded questions iswhat the licensing condition is sensitive to.

Sloppy pro in Greek: An E-type analysis
Despina Oikonomou (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Friday, 16:30-17:00, West Lounge, 2nd floor
It has been observed that null subjects (NSs) in Japanese allow a sloppy interpretation whereas NSs
in Romance languages do not (Oku 1998). This difference has led to the idea that NSs in Japanesetype languages is an instance of argument ellipsis whereas in Spanish-type languages they are silent
pronouns (Oku 1998, Saito 2007, Takahashi 2007). However, Duguine (2014) provides empiricalevidence for the availability of sloppy readings in Spanish and Basque NSs and argues for a unitary
approach of NSs as Argument DP-Ellipsis. In this talk, I show that sloppy readings are also available
in Greek NSs (1), but I provide evidence against a DP-Ellipsis analysis. I argue instead that thesloppy NSs in Greek are E-type pronouns (paycheck pronouns (Cooper 1979)) in the sense of Elbourne(2001)’s approach.
(1)

a.

b.

i Maria ipe oti to agapimeno tis
fagito ine o musakas.
the Maria said that the favorite
her.poss food is the moussaka‘Maria said that her favorite food is moussaka.’i Yoko ipe oti Ø ine to sushi.
the Yoko said that Ø is the sushi‘Yoko said [it] is sushi.’
XSloppy reading: Yoko said that Yoko’s favorite food is sushi.

Elbourne (2001) analyzes E-type pronouns as a determiner plus NP-Ellipsis. I show that sloppy
interpretation becomes available when the antecedent involves a relational as opposed to a sortal noun.
This contrast follows from Elbourne’s analysis; in relational nouns the possessor is an argument of the
NP (Barker 1991), therefore it is present in the elided NP and can be bound. Object clitics behave ina similar way, allowing sloppy interpretations under certain conditions (cf. Giannakidou & Merchant1997). A new question arises as to whether an E-type analysis of sloppy NSs is applicable in Japanese
as well (Miyagawa 2015).

Ellipsis or pro-form: Reconstruction effects of sluicing in Mandarin Chinese
Wei Song & Masaya Yoshida (Northwestern University)
Friday, 5:00-5:30, West Lounge, 2nd floor
In this talk, we argue that sluicing in Mandarin Chinese involves ellipsis rather than a small pro andthe ellipsis site is associated with full-fledged syntactic structure. Evidence comes from the observationthat Mandarin sluicing shows Binding Condition C reconstruction effects and idiom reconstruction
effects.
There are two approaches to Mandarin sluicing in the literature. The movement-and-ellipsis approach (Wang & Wu 2006, Murphy 2014) claims that Mandarin sluicing is derived from focus movementof the wh-remnant to the left periphery followed by TP-ellipsis (1a). The empty pronominal approach(Adams & Tomioka 2012, Li & Wei 2014) claims that Mandarin sluicing employs no movement andellipsis. Instead, the sluiced clause is a reduced copular clause that includes a subject empty pronominal, a copula shi, and a wh-phrase (1b). The two accounts thus differ in (i) whether Mandarin sluicing
31

involves ellipsis and (ii) how much syntactic structure, if any, there is in the ellipsis site. We show thatthe Binding Condition C reconstruction effects and idiom reconstruction effects are readily capturedby the movement-and-ellipsis approach, but not captured by the empty pronominal approach.
(1)

a.

b.

Yuehan yudao-le mouren, dan wo bu jide
[cp shi [F ocP FOC [tp Yuehan
John meet-perf someone but 1sg neg remembershiJohn
yudao-le t1 ]]].
meet-perf‘John met someone, but I don’t remember who.’(movement-and-ellipsis)
Yuehan yudao-lemouren, dan wo bu jide
[cp pro shi shei].
John meet-PERF someone but 1sg neg remember
shi who‘John met someone, but I don’’t remember who.’(empty pronominal)

Effects of language contact in pitch-accents: The case of Gernika Basque
Itxaso Rodrı́guez (University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign) &Kelsie Gillig (Indiana University – Purdue University Fort Wayne)
Saturday, 3:15-3:45, East Lounge, 2nd floor
The goals of the present study are (1) to examine a possible loss of pitch-accent system in Gernika
Basque and (2) to determine that such loss is due to contact (Irurtzun 2003; Hualde & Elordieta 2014).
57 Gernika-Basque/Spanish bilinguals, stratified by age, gender and degree of contact (measured basedon self-reported information on social networks, language proficiency, and home language), were asked
to produce 20 declarative sentences forming 10 minimally contrasting pairs. The three prototypicalprosodic properties of Gernika Basque (A/U distinction, initial rise and duration correlates with accentual prominence) were measured following Hualde et al. (2002). Multiple ANOVAs were performed
using the statistical software R.
Results show that language dominance was a significant predictor only for the older group in thesense that Spanish-dominant speakers lost their A/U distinction. As for the younger group, themaintenance of the A/U was better predicted according to social networks; if the speaker reported tohave Basque friends and speak Basque with them, A/U was maintained, regardless of home language.
There was no main effect of group for the initial rise, suggesting that all groups have an initial rise.
Finally, results revealed males with higher durational correlates in condition B, regardless of whether
they maintain an A/U distinction. Although evidence for language change is inconclusive, two claims
are made: (a) the three properties analyzed are largely independent from each other (Hualde et al.
2002; Hyman 2007) and (b) this study provides wider support for the role of social networks as a
viable factor in language contact and acquisition of prosody (Milroy & Gordon, 2008).

The transfer of negative doubling in Chipilo, an Italo-Mexican community
Olga Tararova (University of Toronto)
Friday, 3:45-4:15, East Lounge, 2nd floor
In standard Spanish, negation is preverbal, as in (1) Yo no hablo italiano (‘I do not speak Italian’);the presence of a postverbal marker no is considered ungrammatical. However, in Veneto (a Northern
Italian dialect), both markers are used: one preverbally and the second one at the end of the utterance,
as in (2) Mi no parle talian no (‘I do not speak Italian NEG’). According to sporadic observation, I
hypothesized that the construction in (2) has been transferred into the Spanish of bilingual speakers
in Chipilo, Mexico (bilingual community of Veneto and Spanish, which preserved Veneto for over 120
years), resulting in instances of negative doubling (ND) as in (3) Yo no hablo italiano no (‘I do not32speak Italian NEG’), used to reinforce the negation. I investigated the frequency of use of ND as in(3) in comparison with the standard option in (1), according to the following social factors: sex, age(18-34, 55+), and parents’ ethnicity. Based on preliminary data, stimuli were coded for the following
linguistic factors: previous adjacent constituent, use of other negative words, and negative mention
in the preceding context, which was shown to have a positive effect on the elicitation of ND use.
For this project, 54 bilingual participants and 21 monolingual Mexicans were recruited to do a semispontaneous interview, a preference forced-choice task, and a sentence repetition in Spanish. A total of
565 tokens were extracted and analyzed using the Goldvarb program. Overall, speakers produced ND
in 43% (n=248) of the available contexts. Bilingual Chipileños and those whose father is Chipileñofavoured the use of ND in two of three tasks (over 40%). Significantly more males than females,
and younger speakers than the older ones, favored the use of ND in the controlled tasks. There
was a tendency to use ND with a second negative mention, verb and adverb as previous adjacentconstituents, and negative words in the object position. These results provide evidence to bilingual
speech differences and support the general hypothesis about the transfer effects of a minority language
phenomenon into the majority language use.

Attitudes and endangerment in a Mopan village
William Salmon & Jennifer Gomez Menjivar (University of Minnesota)
Friday, 16:30-17:00, East Lounge, 2nd floor
Discussions of language endangerment generally involve a minority language in contact with a majority
language such as English or Spanish and for various reasons suffering as a result of this contact. This
basic story is well known. The present research looks at a variation of this story, however, that is
discussed much less frequently: namely, contact and endangerment between minority languages in a
multilingual society. We focus on Mopan, a Mayan language spoken in Belize by approximately 6,00010,000 speakers. Tanaka (2012) is the first to mention Mopan as a potentially endangered language.
Our study is the first in-depth discussion of language attitudes toward Mopan from a cross-generational
perspective, and it is the first to discuss the diminishing prestige of Mopan in the context of several
socio-economic factors, including the rising prestige of Kriol, which is itself a minority language.
We collected 78 attitude surveys in a Mopan village of approximately 800 residents in the Toledo
district. Our analysis uncovered strong generational differences with regard to: 1) the place of Mopan
Maya in educational settings, 2) the importance of Mopan on Mayan identity, 3) Mopan as a homelanguage, and 4) the decrease in the ability to speak Mopan. We then conducted 47 ethnographic
interviews with Mayan college students in Punta Gorda Town, located approximately 20 miles awayfrom the village. Our questions were open-ended, and we encouraged participants to talk about theiruse of Mopan and Kriol, with whom they used the languages, and how they viewed Mopan and Kriol
with respect to their career goals and everyday lives. The results here mirror those described above:
Kriol seems to be held in high regard, and this status seems to come at the expense of the traditional
Mopan.

Language endangerment and lexical erosion: Surveys and solutions
Antonia Cristinoi & François Nemo (Université d’Orléans)
Friday, 5:00-5:30, East Lounge, 2nd floor
Based on data collected during ten years of fieldwork in French Guyana, mainly on Palikur, an
Arawakan language, this paper discusses the notion of lexical erosion in contrast with lexical intrusion(borrowing of words corresponding to new referents, and which have no lexical correspondent in theendangered language), lexical competition (existence of concurrent forms in two or more languages
33

for the same referent) and relexification (replacement of those specific fractions of the lexicon withthe corresponding borrowings from another language). We shall highlight here the difference between
extensive lexical borrowing in a language - either due to the quick changes affecting the lifestyle ofthe communities at stake or to a combination of lexical competition and code-switching - and lexical
erosion, showing that the latter consists in a radical loss of the lexicon for specific lexical fields whose
result is not relexification within the language but a mere incapacity to use the language in a given
subject area. This will be illustrated by presenting the results of surveys dedicated to measuring lexical competence in various communities of Palikur speakers in French Guyana (Saint Georges, Trois
Palétuviers, Régina, and Macouria).
This illustration will be followed by a discussion of methodological issues, explaining our surveys
on lexical competence conducted in French Guyana in 2013 and 2014 and showing that they area promising way to get access to the reality of linguistic practices, by providing objective data on
language use.
Finally, we shall discuss the way the existence of lexical erosion can be dealt with in language
endangerment situations and especially the way of documenting vanishing lexicons which appears insuch cases to be an urgent necessity.

Gender, like classifiers, marks uniform atomicity: Evidence from Serbo-Croatian
Boban Arsenijević (University of Niš)
Saturday, 9:00-9:30, West Lounge, 2nd floor
I present a number of quirks in the agreement with neuter subject in Serbo-Croatian:(1)

Collective forms are only productively derived from neuter gender nouns, in which case they
trigger plural agreement on the finite verb. Those from the other two genders trigger singular.

(2)

Wechsler & Zlatić (2000) analyze the agreement of semantically MPl, morpho-syntactically FSg
hybrid agreement nouns as NPl: where does the neuter come from?

(3)

Derived neuter nouns with non-neuter bases cannot inflect for plural.

(4)

Irrespective of the gender of the nouns and referents involved, deictic expressions, expressions
with a marked person value and expressions referring to assemblies of individual atoms cannot
trigger NPl agreement.

I propose a view in which the count-mass distinction is lexically specified by an incorporated
classifier component. Each noun incorporates one default classifier, which specifies its mass nature in
the case of mass nouns, or its default unit of counting in the case of count nouns. I model collective
nouns as nouns which incorporate a paucal classifier.
This incorporated classifier component can be over-written by an explicit classifier, typically ina partitive relation. Such cases allow for coercion: mass nouns can take count atomic and paucal
classifiers, count nouns can take mass and paucal classifiers and collective nouns can take mass andatomic count classifiers, and receive the respective interpretations.
The incorporated classifier is part of the lexical semantics of the noun. In order to be grammatically
expressed, and to compose with other grammatically specified semantic components, e.g. grammaticalnumber, this classifier needs to be grammatically expressed. In Serbo-Croatian, it is grammatically
expressed through the morpho-syntactic realization of gender. Neuter gender is taken as the absenceof gender (Kramer 2009), and hence it leads to a failure to syntactically express the incorporated
classifier. I show how this explains the observations in (1-4).
34

Two contrasts are better than one: [±realis] and [±affirmative] in Arapaho
Ksenia Bogomolets (University of Connecticut)
Saturday, 9:30-10:00, West Lounge, 2nd floor
This paper deals with morphology of the Algonquian language Arapaho and makes two major claims.
I provide an analysis of the morpho-phonological process in Arapaho traditionally known as Initial
Change (IC). I argue that IC is a manifestation of the [±realis] contrast in the language. The main
analytical claim of the current study is the following. Morphological process of IC is constrained by
two kinds of conditions. Firstly, IC is constrained by morpho-syntactic competition for spell-out of
the C head. Secondly, the process is restricted semantically to apply only in [+realis] contexts.
Analysis presented in this paper attempts to explain the patterns of allomorphy observed on theleft edge of word-initial verb stems, and in tense and aspect prefixes in Arapaho. In addressing
the relationship between agreement orders, clause types, tense, aspect and mood morphology in thelanguage, this paper presents a unified analysis of the verbal architecture in Arapaho. In particular, I
show that structural restrictions on the CP level, namely that Arapaho is a simple CP language, explain
the patterns of distribution and constraints on co-occurrence of a set of (features and) morphemesthat have been cross-linguistically argued to be generated in the C head. Moreover, I provide an
explanation for an intriguing tense-related asymmetry: verbs in present and future tenses are marked
for [±realis] and for the contrast between affirmative/non-affirmative agreements while verbs in pasttense morphologically only mark the latter and do not take part in the [±realis] distinction.

Number agreement in languages with two hierarchies
Thuy Bui (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Saturday, 10:15-10:45, West Lounge, 2nd floor
I investigate cross-linguistic variation in plurality agreement constructions that involve person hierarchy (PH) effects, proposing a unified account for the syntactic derivation of agreement in languages
that have only one apparent PH effect and those that have two. For languages with only one PH,such as Ojibwe (Valentine 2001) and Swampy Cree (Ellis 1983), both the prefix and the plural suffix
follow the same PH in which second person outranks first person (2 > 1). In contrast, if there are
two active PHs in the language, as in the case of Meskwaki (Goddard 1994) and Plains Cree (Wolfart1973), the agreement slots take on different rankings. While the prefix marks the second person,ranking 2 > 1 in this slot, it is the first person plural that appears in the plural suffix, determining
the 1 > 2 PH.
I argue that in order to license φ-features in the plural paradigm, both types of languages require
two distinct probes, which are the person (π) and number (#) probes. In the first cycle of agree,person licensing condition (Béjar & Rezac 2003) picks out first and second person argument DPs
to enter into an agree relation. The π-probe then checks these DP’s person features. The analysis
then introduces plural licensing condition, which requires an interpretable plural feature to belicensed. The DP arguments then enter the second cycle of agree with the #-probe. This probe firstlooks for the DP that has not yet been checked in the first cycle, and then agrees with that DP. If
there is no such DP, it will check the argument that has already been marked. The crucial factor thatdiffers one-PH languages with two-PH ones is whether the goals are available for matching with the#-probe after their features have been checked by the π-probe.
35

Two types of dual numbers
Dejan Milačić (McGill University)
Saturday, 10:45-11:15, West Lounge, 2nd floor
I identify three attested patterns for the morphological expression of dual and plural number inlanguages with number systems which include these categories. I note that two of these patterns leadto contradictory predictions about the morphological markedness of dual relative to plural. Plural isexpressed by more morphemes than dual in languages like Mi’gmaq (Coon & Bale 2014), while dualis expressed by more morphemes than plural in languages like Manam (Lichtenberk 1983).
The system of number features and markedness put forward by Nevins (2011) is argued to accountfor the Manam pattern, but does not account for the Mi’gmaq pattern. I show that a logical extensionof this feature system in fact gives the opposite result: it accounts for the Mi’gmaq pattern, but does
not account for the Manam pattern. I give evidence from semantics and agreement to argue that
this result is desirable. Based on this evidence, I suggest that dual marking in languages like Manamshould be analyzed like non-inflectional plural marking (Wiltschko 2008; Butler 2011). I conclude thatthe meaning of dual marking in these languages comes from the morpheme’s origin as the numeral‘two’ rather than coming from a number feature as in languages with the other two patterns.

German relative clauses and the severed index hypothesis
Emily Hanink & Julian Grove (The University of Chicago)
Saturday, 3:45-4:15, West Lounge, 2nd floor
German definite articles are able to contract with prepositions under certain conditions. When anoun phrase is discourse anaphoric, contraction is blocked. In the current paper we present a puzzle
surrounding this generalization: Restrictive relative clauses require the use of the non-contracted(strong) article form, despite their apparent lack of anaphoricity; both the determiner of the headnoun and the relative pronoun (which is, in most cases, syncretic with the definite article) surface
with the strong form. In this talk we provide a uniform analysis of discourse anaphoric and relative
clause uses that requires interpreting indices as features that may occupy their own projections in
nominal structure. In our analysis, the distinction between the strong and weak form is structural;
the strong form contains an additional projection, which we call ‘dxP’, that intervenes between thedeterminer and the noun in anaphoric contexts. idxP hosts an index feature that may act either as abindee, in the relative-clause internal position, or as a binder, in the relative-clause external position.
By building assignment functions into the semantic model, we show that idx can compositionallybind elements within its scope. We therefore unite anaphoric and relative clause uses by showingthat both require the same additional structure, which is absent in the contracted (weak form), forbinding purposes. We support our structural claims for the presence of idx, which is generally covert,
with morphological evidence wherein the modifier ‘same’ is an overt realization of this head crosslinguistically. To support this, we draw on evidence from a pattern involving German contraction
with this modifier, as well as from the behavior of the Hebrew pronoun ‘oto’.

Resistance to phonetic change in York, Northern England
Daniel Lawrence (The University of Edinburgh)
Saturday, 9:00-9:30, East Lounge, 2nd floor
This study reports on a sound change in progress in York, Northern England: the fronting of the backvowels /o/ and /u/. Previous work (e.g. Labov 1994) has consistently reported that the fronting36

of /u/ typically precedes the fronting of /o/ across varieties of English, and realizations of /u/ areusually found to be further advanced in the vowel space than those of /o/ in varieties where bothvowels are undergoing fronting.
The present study attempted to assess evidence for this pattern in York speech. Data are presented
from word list recordings of 52 speakers born between 1935 and 2000. Acoustic analyses are consistent
with previous findings, suggesting that there is an internal bias toward the co-fronting of /u/ and /o/in this variety. However, examining the dynamic properties of /o/ reveals a constraint on this bias.
The degree of /o/ diphthongization is highly variable across speakers, and younger speakers who use
monophthongal variants appear to resist the internal pressure to front this vowel.
Previous work on York speech (Haddican et al. 2013) has suggested that this apparent resistanceto fronting is due to fronted /o/ monophthongs being linked to a stigmatized social meaning: thenegative working-class stereotype of the ‘chav’. This proposal was tested experimentally. Listeners
matched resynthesized speech tokens to images representing locally-relevant stereotypes. The perceptual results confirm that monophthongal /o/ realizations are strongly associated with working-classstereotypes. Additionally, back, diphthongal /o/ is associated with the ‘chav’ stereotype, particularly
among younger listeners. However, in contrast to previous claims, fronted variants were less likely tocue a selection of the ‘chav’ character.
These results demonstrate how the social perception of phonetic variation may differ across speakergroups, and highlight the need to triangulate sources of evidence when arguing for a role of social
evaluation in patterns of sound change.

Stages of grammaticalization as an explanation of disharmonic suffixes in Turkish
Tim Zingler (University of New Mexico)
Saturday, 9:30-10:00, East Lounge, 2nd floor
Finley (2010) argues that disharmonic sequences in vowel harmony languages are exceptional morphemes for which no phonological explanation exists. I will suggest that for disharmonic sequences inTurkish, phonological explanations are available after all. Participation in vowel harmony is usuallytaken to be a defining criterion for the grammaticalization of Turkish suffixes (e.g., Kabak 2006: 41).
That is, the further advanced the formal dependence of an item, the more likely the constraints ofvowel harmony are to affect that item. Meanwhile, a well-known concomitant of grammaticalization
processes in general is formal reduction of the grammaticalizing element (e.g., Hopper & Traugott
2003: 154). Taken together, these two insights predict that disharmonic suffixes in Turkish should bephonologically larger than fully grammaticalized, harmonic ones. I will posit the number of syllables
as the most straightforward measure of phonological size.
An analysis of the tagged suffixes in the digital TS Corpus of contemporary written Turkish (Sezer& Sezer 2013) reveals that the above prediction is indeed borne out. Disharmonic suffixes (N = 10) are
disyllabic rather than monosyllabic to a statistically significant degree (Fisher’s exact test, p < .05)
when compared to harmonic suffixes (N = 45). Based on the above reasoning, the conclusion isthus that disharmonic suffixes are at an earlier stage of grammaticalization and continue to behave
like free lexical items, which do not fall within the harmony domain of adjacent lexical elements.
This finding has two major consequences. First, since Turkish “suffixes” are arranged all across thegrammaticalization cline, they are not a coherent set. Second, since synchronic approaches from ausage-based frequency perspective would not fare better in terms of explaining the dataset than the
proposed diachronic one does, it seems to follow that the diachronic angle deserves a more prominentplace in grammatical description.
37

Language change among Louisiana creoles in Southeast Texas
Nathan A. Wendte (Tulane University)
Saturday, 10:15-10:45, East Lounge, 2nd floor
Language ideologies are perpetually in flux. Within Louisiana, it has been noted that ethnic labels like
“Creole” and “Cajun” often serve as stand-ins for racial classifications which are then superimposedon the linguistic situation. This appears to be an instance of fractal recursivity, as defined by Irvine &Gal (2000). However, Creoles in Southeast Texas seem to be modifying their ideologies to encompass
more variation and broader definitions both ethnically and linguistically. This may indicate an in situ
occurrence of erasure (Irvine & Gall 2000) that complements the work of Dubois & Melançon (2000)
among Creole communities in Louisiana. The present study is based on research among self-identified
Creoles claiming to speak the Creole language. The preliminary interviews informing this study wereconducted between November 2015 and March 2016 and included a sociolinguistic questionnaire, atranslation task, and free conversation. My data consist of linguistic tokens and explicit attitudes fromparticipants in Harris and Jefferson counties — two of the ten counties I define as Southeast Texas.
As Mufwene notes in his foreword to Blommaert’s recent book, “static geolinguistics [is] clearly out ofdate” (Blommaert 2010: xi-xii). I hope that by expanding the view of francophone Louisiana to include
its diasporic populations, we might arrive at a fuller understanding of linguistic and identity-creative
practices.

Meaning change from superlatives to definite descriptions: A semantic perspective
Jun Chen (Yale University) & Dawei Jin (SUNY at Buffalo)
Saturday, 10:45-11:15, East Lounge, 2nd floor
This paper describes a special Chinese numeral phrase construction (hereafter da-NumP) of the form
[Num da N], where a morpheme da intervenes between a numeral Num and a noun N. In ClassicalChinese, da-NumPs have a superlative meaning: A da-NumP refers to the top Num entities out of all
the contextually-relevant entities within the extension of N. In Modern Chinese, da-NumPs also havethe meaning of a definite description: A da-NumP refers to the unique plurality that consists of Num
entities.
This paper argues that da-NumPs have an intermediate stage, where the superlative reading isretained, yet N denotes the top Num plurality of entities only, instead of the restrictor of the numeral
quantifier, as in (1).
(1)[Context: The Beijing-based Shuntian Daily selected the three most prominent out of all theactive male actors]
Jing-jüsan da ming-dan
tong-taiyanchu.
Peking-opera three DA prestigious-male.actor same-stage perform‘Peking Opera’s three top (male actors), the prestigious actors, performed on the same stage...’I propose that N in this intermediate stage is a nominal supplement, in apposition to the anchor[Num da]. The anchor is a superlative quantificational NP that takes an implicit restrictor, whichis the determiner three in (1). It then composes with the supplement (prestigious actors) and theat-issue matrix predicate (performed on the same stage), in two successive, asymmetric updates, seenin (2).
(2)‘Three top male actorsi [are prestigious actors]supplement , AND [theyi performed on the samestage]at issue ...’
38

I argue that this intermediate stage is critical to the trajectory, by allowing hearers to reanalyze
da from a superlative operator to a definiteness marker: After N changed from restrictor-denoting to
supplement-denoting, it becomes subject to a reanalysis as the nominal predicate of a definite pluralNP.
The present study presents a novel understanding of how superlatives changed to definite descriptions that are relevant to both the fields of grammaticalization and formal semantics.

Negation in proto-Kampan
Zachary O’Hagan (University of California, Berkeley)
Saturday, 11:15-11:45, East Lounge, 2nd floor
This presentation explores the diachrony and variation of negation systems in the Kampan Arawak
languages of lowland Peru and reconstructs both the categories and forms of the proto-Kampan
negation system. Kampan languages — which include Nomatsigenka, Ashéninka, Ash·ninka, Caquinte,
Matsigenka, and Nanti — are largely homogeneous in their subsystem of main clause negation, but arelargely heterogeneous with respect to other sorts of negation. As an example of the former point, all
Kampan languages exhibit distinct preverbal particles that differ in whether they negate a notionallyrealis or irrealis clause. As an example of the latter point, Nomatsigenka, Matsigenka, and Nanti
preserve a proto-Kampan pattern of expressing negative indefinite pronouns via a construction thatconsists of the realis negator followed by an interrogative pronoun. In contrast, Ashéninka, Ash·ninka,
and Caquinte have innovated a negative indefinite pronoun that is distinct from all interrogative
pronouns in those languages.
I review standard negation, negative imperatives, existential, copular, and metalinguistic negation,negative indefinite expressions, and negative interrogative pronouns in order to demonstrate how thesesubsystems have remained stable, or come into or gone out of existence, as grammaticized constructionsin these languages, and how new forms have been innovated to express already extant categories. For
example, the ancestral language of Matsigenka and Nanti innovated an irrealis main clause negator*gara and an existential negator *mameri — two categories which reconstruct to proto-Kampan —and in doing so it lost a reflex of the proto-Kampan existential negator *kaga. It also innovateda distinct category of metalinguistic negation in the form of *matsi. This work contributes to theunderstanding of synchronic variation among these languages, informs research on the reconstructionof grammatical subsystems and on the phylogeny of Kampan languages, and allows for finer-grained
comparison of negation systems within the large and diverse Arawak family.

Conventionalizing at least some determiners
Dunja Veselinović (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
Saturday, 2:00-2:30, West Lounge, 2nd floor
There is an ongoing debate in the literature as to whether Superlative Modifiers (SMs) like at least andat most are to be treated as degree constructions (e.g., Hackl 2000, Nouwen 2010) or focus sensitive
operators (Krifka 1999, Beck 2010). By looking at the properties of sentences with focus and SMs
in a variety of languages, this paper makes a case for the focus sensitive approach. I show that SMs
are focusing elements (Krifka 1999) whose Association With Focus (AWF) is Conventional, C-AWF(Beaver & Clark 2008); i.e., SMs have a lexically-encoded, conventionalized dependency on focus.
Crucially, this lexically encoded dependency is not shared by other (bare) forms of the superlative(e.g., -est). This claim is supported by a number of arguments, showing that SMs behave like only
and other scalar elements, and unlike bare superlatives with respect to a number of phenomena. SMs
39require to c-command a focalized element, so that their domain variable is not contextually resolved.
This is what sets SMs and only apart from -est and quantificational adverbs (e.g., always). SMs areinterpreted as focusing adverbs that can combine with a variety of elements: for some constituent αof type hσ, sti, where σ is any type, ≤ is a — possibly pragmatic — ordering of contextually salient
alternatives, and JαKf is the set of focus alternatives of α:


V
V
(1)
a. Jat least αK = λβhσi .λwhsi : ∃γ γ ∈ JαKf
JαKo ≤ γ
γ(β)(w)V
b. Jat most αK = λβhσi .λwhsi : ∀γ γ ∈ JαKf
γ(β)(w) → γ ≤ JαKo
Supporting evidence for (1) shows that SMs (i) cannot associate with prosodically weak pronouns,(ii) show intervention effects, (iii) cannot associate with extracted elements that are realized in higher
clauses, and behave like only in that (iv) they cannot associate backwards, and (v) the elision of a VP
containing the associate of an SM results in ungrammaticality.

Structural differences between epistemic and root modality: Evidence from BCS
Dunja Veselinović (New York University)
Saturday, 2:30-3:00, West Lounge, 2nd floor
The distinction between epistemic and root modals has been argued to be syntactic (Cinque 1999) orcontextually determined in the sematic/pragmatic component, with no syntactic differences needed(Kratzer 1977 et seq.). This paper adds to that discussion, showing constructions with epistemic
modals verbs are biclausal, while ones with root modals are monoclausal, based on novel data from
Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS). Epistemic modal uses of the verb morati ‘must’ (as in (1)) are
shown to differ from the root modal uses (as in (2)) of the same verb in default word order, agreement
and tense, licensing ni-NPIs, scope of negation, and availability of perfective verbal complements.
(1)

Mora-∅daje
Rakapaikabi-okralj.
must-3SG.PRS COMP be.3SG.PRS Rakapaika.M.NOM be-PPT.M.SG king.M-NOM.SG‘Rakapaika must have been the king.’(epistemic, default w.o.)(2)

Rakapaikajemora-oda bud-e
kralj.
Rakapaika.M.NOM be.3SG.PRS must-PPT.M.SG DA be.SBJV-3SG king.M-NOM.SG‘Rakapaika had to be the king.’(deontic)

The facts presented suggest that deontic and epistemic modals are merged in two distinct positions.
I argue that epistemic modals are merged higher, taking a VP complement headed by optionallysilent infinitive biti ‘to be’ (it can be overt in affirmatives, omitted for space) which itself takes a
CP complement, making constructions with epistemic modals biclausal. For deontic modals, I present
evidence that their complements are VPs headed by the main verb. These conclusions support Cinque(1999)’s claim (followed by Drubig (2001), Hacquard (2011) and others) that epistemic modals arehigher than root modals, but conflict with the idea that epistemic and root modals are part of the sameclause. Kratzer (1977 et seq.)’s framework can accommodate for this, but a purely semantic accountis insufficient, as syntactic differences between epistemic and root modals beyond the difference in themodal base and the ordering source have to be accounted for.

Explaining DPs vs. CPs without syntax
Patrick Elliott (University College London)
Saturday, 3:15-3:45, West Lounge, 2nd floor

40

Pietroski (2000) observes that explain gives rise to different readings when it combines (a) with a DP
headed by a content noun (1-a), and (b) a that-clause (1-b). Pietroski’s analysis is that DPs receivea theme theta-role, and CPs receive a content theta-role.
(1)

a.
b.

Aaron explained [DP the fact that Barbara left].
Aaron explained [CP that Barbara left].

This is an instance of a broader class of meaning alternations involving DPs and that-clauses underembedding verbs such as fear, know, and predict (see King (2002) and others); a similar solution is
tempting. I argue against stating the analysis in terms of syntactic category, on the basis of expressions
such as the same thing, which I argue have the syntax of DPs and the semantics of that-clauses.
I outline a system which accounts for these facts in the semantics. Following Moulton (2015), andKratzer (2014), I take that-clauses to denote predicates of individuals with propositional content. I
furthermore adopt a neo-Davidsonian event semantics (Parsons 1990), according to which all verbs
denote predicates of events/states. I argue against a basic type distinction between individuals andevents/states. Consequently, verbs and that-clauses denote predicates of type he, ti, and may combine
via Predicate Modification (Heim & Kratzer 1998).
The pay-off is that clausal “arguments” are modifiers which imbue events/states with propositional
content. DPs headed by content nouns denote/quantify over individuals (type e), and are therefore
integrated into the Logical Form as genuine thematic arguments.
I extend this system to account for the selectional properties of believe-type verbs, which are compatible with both clausal and nominal complements (2-a), and think -type verbs, which are (apparently)
only compatible with clausal complements (2-b). We can explain this without invoking abstract caseor c-selection, if we assume that only believe introduces a neo-Davidsonian theme function.
(2)

a.
b.

Aaron believes (the rumour) that Barbara left.
Aaron thinks (*the rumour) that Barbara left.

On the DP/NP status of nominal projections in Bangla: Consequences for thetheory of phases
Andrew Simpson & Saurov Syed (University of Southern California)
Saturday, 2:00-2:30, East Lounge, 2nd floorBošković (2008, 2009) suggests that nominal constituents in languages which do not have (definite)
articles are ‘NP languages’ which do not project a DP level of structure, and supports such an analysis
with reference to a number of common syntactic characteristics present in NP languages, which it isclaimed can potentially all be attributed to the absence of D/DP. These properties include: (a)binding differences between NP and DP languages, (b) free word order of demonstratives, possessors,
and adjectives, (c) lack of neg raising, and (d) lack of adjectivally-modified possessors. The present
paper examines the status of nominal projections in Bangla from the point of view of Bošković’s
generalizations and argues that although Bangla is an article-less language with scrambling, hence
superficially similar to NP languages such as Serbo-Croatian and Russian, it is not an NP language
and projects a range of functional categories above NP, including a DP level. Such a conclusion
is shown to have an important consequence for cross-linguistic assumptions relating to the phasalarchitecture of nominal projections, building on work on nominal-internal phases initiated in (Syed2015), and suggests that the extended projection of noun phrases may contain two separate phases,
in a way that resembles the occurrence of two phasal levels within clauses.
41

Comprehenders infer influences of discourse intent and speaker knowledge state on
linguistic form
Mark Myslı́n, Roger Levy & Andrew Kehler (University of California, San Diego)
Saturday, 2:30-3:00, East Lounge, 2nd floor
We show that the pragmatic impact of a marked syntactic construction be altered as a result of acomprehender’s reasoning about the speaker’s motivation for using the form. It is well-known thatuse of a passive (Brittany was recommended to Charlotte) instead of an active (Susan recommended
Brittany to Charlotte) affects information structure and subsequent reference: Brittany is more topicalin the passive version, which makes it more likely that she will be the referent of a subsequent pronoun.
But establishing Brittany as the topic is only one reason the speaker might choose a passive. Another isthat she doesn’t know who the agent of the event being described is. This notwithstanding, no theoryof information structure nor pronoun interpretation of which we are aware predicts that the effectsof the passive on discourse state would depend on a comprehender’s reasoning about the speaker’s
motivation for choosing it. However, explaining-away studies in cognitive science suggest that they
could, under the assumption that an ideal, rational comprehender will reason not only about what
was said, but also the speaker’s motivations for expressing it in a particular way. In particular, if the
speaker’s motivation is inferred to be due to her knowledge state – i.e., her lack of knowledge of theagent — rather than a discourse intent — i.e., an intent to make a referent topical — a comprehender
may ascribe less topicality to the subject (Brittany). If such explaining-away occurs, we would expect
the subject to attract fewer subsequent pronominal references. In a series of passage completion
experiments, we confirmed this prediction, providing the first experimental evidence of which we areaware that a comprehender’s reasoning about a speaker’s motivations can be used to explain away thepragmatic effects on discourse state associated with marked syntactic constructions.

Antiagreement as intervention
Kunio Kinjo (Rutgers University)
Saturday, 3:15-3:45, East Lounge, 2nd floor
The aim of this talk is to provide a novel account of an agreement-suppression phenomenon induced bysubject-extraction, which has been called the antiagreement effect (aae: Ouhalla 1993). It is argued
that the modification of the probe-goal theory that phrases as well as heads can act as probes enables
us to account for the aae as an intervention effect: wh-agreement between the extracted subject andC0 hinders the subject from probing for T0 . A crucial generalization I present is that the presence of
wh-agreeing C0 implicates the aae. The proposal correctly predicts the cross-linguistic (e.g. Berber
vs. Arabic) and cross-constructional (short vs. long extraction) distribution of the aae. It is alsosuggested that this analysis can extend to the aae induced by negative concord subjects.

Take that!
Haj Ross (University of North Texas)
Saturday, 3:45-4:15, East Lounge, 2nd floor
This paper concerns the pro-NP that, and the deictic determiner that, insofar as they are different. It
would be very satisfying to be able to show that the former derives from the latter via a deletion rule
which elides the head noun that follows the deictic, but there is no evidence that this is correct. And
problems abound: what, for instance, is the source of the that in Kim is taller than Lee, and Pat istaller than that? The paper will concentrate, however, on a that which seems to be a Pro-VP, as in42

sentences such as Pat is fond of eggs, and [her brother is that too/that her brother is too] or Jack ispaying attention, and that I have been too, or Max has written novels, but [that I have not/*but I havenot that]. Note that which can pinch-hit for that here: . . . which his brother is too and . . . which I havebeen too and which I have not. It is disquieting to find words like that and which, which usually can be
replaced by nouns in related sentences, in contexts which are devoid of anything nominal. These thats
and whichs are looked at askance by many speakers, but most speakers allow that as a pro-adjective atleast: Bob is generous – he has always been that. This problem raises its ugly head in German (where
das and was can do some of what that and which can), and in Dutch, where dat and wat do some ofwhat that and which do. It seems that in English there may be an implicational hierarchy:(1)Anyone who accepts a non-topicalized that (. . . but I am not that) will accept a topicalized that(. . . but that I am not), and anyone who accepts this latter will accept . . . which I am not.

43

Acknowledgments
The Chicago Linguistic Society would sincerely like to thank the following sponsors for their generous
financial support of this year’s meeting:• The Office of the Reynolds Club and Student Activities• The Franke Institute for the Humanities
We are especially grateful to our keynote speakers for presenting their research and to all of thesession presenters for sharing their work with us. We appreciate the considerable effort involved in
preparing for, traveling to, and presenting at our conference, not to mention the demanding work that
their research entails. We are also very grateful to all who submitted an abstract for consideration but
did not have an opportunity to present. With a three-day schedule and nearly 250 submissions, it wasnecessary to leave out from the program many outstanding pieces of research. If the Chicago LinguisticSociety conference maintains high standards, it is due in large measure to the notable authors who
submit their work for consideration. Special thanks must also go to the faculty and students in the
Department of Linguistics who offered their valuable advice and support from the very first to thevery last stages of conference preparation. In addition, we want to express our deep gratitude to
all of our anonymous abstract reviewers — external and internal — who provided helpful feedback
to submitting authors. Thanks, too, to all the student volunteers who helped us with the conference
logistics. Finally, we would like to thank all conference attendees for joining us here at the 52nd annual
meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, continuing the tradition of excellence.
Jessica Kantarovich
Tran Truong
Orest Xherija
CLS 52 Organizing Committee

44Chicago Linguistic Society
1115 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637 USA
http://chicagolinguisticsociety.org/