JFM Green Bond
Impact Report 2022

Disclaimer
By reading these materials, you agree to be bound by the following limitations:
No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to, and no reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy,completeness or correctness of the information, or opinions contained herein. Neither JFM nor any of its advisors or
representatives shall have any responsibility or liability whatsoever (for negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arisingfrom any use of these materials or their contents or otherwise arising in connection with these materials. The information set out
herein may be subject to updating, completion, revision, verification and amendment and such information may change materially.
These materials are based on the economic, regulatory, market and other conditions as in effect on the date hereof. It should beunderstood that subsequent developments may affect the information contained in these materials, which neither JFM nor its
advisors or representatives are under an obligation to update, revise or affirm.
Forward-looking statements, including JFM’s plans in these materials, are based on information available to JFM at the time they
were prepared and involve potential risks and uncertainties. Actual results, therefore, may differ from those described in thesematerials due to changes in a variety of factors, such as market trends, economic conditions and regulations. Accordingly,
investors are advised to use their own discretion and exercise great caution when making investment decisions.
These materials and the information contained herein do not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of orsolicitation or invitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities of JFM. Securities of JFM not registered under the U.S.
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to U.S.
persons absent registration under or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the United States securities
laws. These materials and the information contained herein are being furnished to you solely for your information and may not be
reproduced or redistributed to any other person, in whole or in part. In particular, neither the information contained in thesematerials nor any copy hereof may be, directly or indirectly, taken or transmitted into or distributed in the United States, Canada,
Australia, Japan, Hong Kong or any other jurisdiction which prohibits the same except in compliance with applicable securities
laws. Any failure to comply with this restriction may constitute a violation of U.S. or other national securities laws. No money,
securities or other consideration is being solicited, and, if sent in response to this presentation or the information contained herein,
will not be accepted.

1

Table of Contents

About This Report… P 3

Executive Summary… P 4

JFM and Sewerage… P 5

JFM SDGs Related Lending Operations… P 6

JFM Green Bond Framework… P 7

Reporting… P 8 - 39

( I ) Amount of Loan to Sewerage Projects… P 8( ii ) Breakdown of Green Bond Effective Portfolio… P 9( iii ) Project by Project Reporting… P 10( iv ) Case Study… P 342

About This ReportJapan Finance Organization for Municipalities (JFM) provides loans toprojects operated by local governments. As of 31 March 2022, total
outstanding loans stood JPY 23.5508 tn, of which JPY 6.8695 tn was forsewerage, accounting for 29.2% of the total amount.
JFM issued its third green bond in January 2022 to finance the Japanese
local governments’ sewerage projects and fully allocated the net proceeds by
30 March 2022 after issuance.
JFM conducted a survey to 70 local governments selected by JFM’s Green
Bond Working Group where loans were made between 3 February 2022 and30 March 2022 and of which the loan amount for the project was JPY 300
mm or higher in principle and obtained effective response from 62 local
governments. (Total loan amount: approximately JPY 95 bn, effective
response rate: 89%)
In this report, JFM put together the overview of each sewerage projects
which JFM financed and its environmental impacts including impact
indicators based on the response in the survey. The objective of this report isto actively disclose to investors the Japanese local governments’ efforts on
SDGs and the environmental impact of each projects.

JFM’s Loan Portfolio by Project Types
Local Road Development 2.0% Others 9.5%
Industrial Water Supply 0.7%
Public Projects 2.2%
Sewerage
29.2%

Disaster Management and Mitigation 3.5%
Hospitals 4.8%
Special Municipal Mergers 4.7%

水道
Water
13.5%
SupplyTransportation 3.2%

12.9%
Three Special Projects 1.7%

Temporary Financial
臨時財政対策債
Countermeasures
25.1%
Funding
25.6%※As of 31 March 2022

The amount and number of JFM loans made for sewerage projects
4,000

Amount(JPY100 mm)

3,000

Number of projects

2,000※The above loan amountincludes refinancing for
sewerage projects

1,000

Amount of electricity saved (kWh)

0

0.5

2017

2018

2019

mm

2020

2021 （Fiscal Year）

Volume of treated water (m3)

4.6

bn

Population of the treated area (thousand)

18,935

Total extension of pipes (km)319.5※The above data is calculated based on the survey

3

Executive Summary
JFM provides loans to local governments on
SDGs related projects. Sewerage projects take upa large portion of JFM’s total lending, whichreaches about JPY 300 ~ 400 bn annually.
On the back of the growing global concerns on
SDGs, JFM issued USD 750 mm green bond in
January 2022, in order to promote actively theJapanese local governments’ efforts on SDGs andto secure stable provision of long-term funding at
low interest rates.

The breakdown of the sewerage projects related loans by JFM FY2021 is asfollows
Loan Amount by Project Type

Bond Ratings

A1 / A+ (Moody’s / S&P)

Tenor

3-yearIssue AmountUSD 750 mm

Pricing Date

19 January 2022

Issue Date

27 January 2022

Maturity Date

27 January 2025

Coupon1.500%

Second-party Opinion
ProviderMoody’s

Sustainability Quality
Score

SQS2
(Very good)(1) (JPY mm)
Sewerage
Treatment Plant
13,582.1

Advanced
Treatment Plant
24.2
Others 0.03%
14,228.5

14%

15%

Purification Center
4,951.9(2) (JPY mm)
Towns andVillages
23,479.2

Others2,179.0

Prefectures
2,059.3
1% Government-

1%

designated Cities
10,055.3
4%

8%

5%

JFM’s green bond has received a second-party
opinion from Moody’s and has attained an SQS2
sustainability quality score (very good).

Summary of Terms - Green Bond

Loan Amount by Type of Borrower

Pipes
57,565.5

Pump
Station5,004.8

5%

Cities245,415.2

87%

60％

(1) Breakdown of green bond eligible projects from 3 February 2022 to 30 March 2022 (approximately JPY 95 bn)(2) Breakdown of all the sewerage projects related loans in FY2021(3) Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

JFM has conducted surveys to relevant local government borrowers in order tomeasure the environmental impacts of their sewerage projects. Loans from 3
February to 30 March 2022 were targeted for the survey, and the refinancing rate
for sewerage projects was 0%. Moreover, the following effects were observed:

Summary of Survey Results
Total extension of
pipes
(km)

Covered area
population

Water management
capacity(㎥)

Amount ofelectricity saved
(kWh)

319.5

18,935,043

4,653,649,358

577,278※The number of the survey sample for local governments was 70, and 62 returned effective response (89%)※Summary Methodology
・Total extension of pipes is addition of new constructed pipes
・Covered area population is addition of new pipes, new/renewal of sewerage related facilities
・Water management capacity is addition of annual planned/ actual water management capacity in sewerage related
facilities
・Amount of electricity saved is addition of monthly planned/actual electricity saved

4

JFM and Sewerage
JFM was established as a joint funding organization wholly owned by all
Japanese local governments and has provided long-term and low-interestrate loans to local governments. JFM has supported local governments’finance in the capital markets and has contributed to their sound financial
management and promoted the welfare of their residents.

Japan Finance Organization for Municipalities
President and CEO
SATO Fumitoshi

Local governments, amidst a decrease in population, are facing various
administrative demand, such as the revitalization of regions, measuresagainst the declining birth rate and an aging population, deteriorating
infrastructure, measures against large-scale and intensifying natural
disasters.
To address these challenges, JFM has provided loans to local
governments who develop infrastructure and administrative services totheir residents and has contributed to sustainable development of thecommunity and environment.
Sewerage, which covers the largest portion of JFM’s loan portfolio, is managed by local governments and the quality of water isregulated under the laws of Japan. Sewerage plays an important role and contributes to the improvement of living conditions,prevention of floods and preservation of water quality through wastewater treatment and rain water drainage. The national
government and the local governments have worked together to create a sustainable sewerage system such as measures against
aging facilities and minimizing the effect of national disasters and JFM contributes to a sustainable development of the system byproviding loans to local governments.
The Japanese government has set specific targets on sewerage business based on the Paris Agreement, by setting
environmental measures such as sludge recycle rate. Moreover, in accordance with the Act on Promoting of Global WarmingCountermeasures and its related policies, Japan has set a policy goal of achieving the utilization rate of sewage sludge as energy
such as biomass power generation.

5

JFM SDGs Related Lending Operations
Sewerage

Water Supply andIndustrial Water Supply

Transportation

Purification Center

Water Supply Plant

Tramway

Hospitals andElderly Care Services

Disaster Management
and Mitigation

Hospital

Tsunami Evacuation Tower

6

JFM Green Bond Framework
Approach to Sustainability

Alignment with the Green Bond Principle, 2018 (GBP)

Local Governance in Japan and JFM’s contribution

JFM’s Green Bond Framework is aligned with four corecomponents of the GBP＊SDGs Mapping-Fund Usage by JFM, 31.6% (As of 31 March 2019) arefinanced for Sewerage projects

1 Use of Proceeds

Development of Sewerage System in JapanAn amount equal to the net proceeds will be allocated to the
Eligible Green Projects set forth below＊Sewerage business is operated by municipalities and quality of water isregulated under laws of Japan

Further initiatives and towards achievement of SDGs

2 Process for Project Evaluation and Selection
JFM Loan Department will confirm that the borrower has
obtained consent or approval on the borrowing from relevant
authorities

Rationale for Issuance
Sewerage industry can contribute to a sustainable economy andpublic healthGreen Bond Working Group will conduct a survey tomunicipalities to determine the effective portfolio

JFM hopes to broaden its investor base by attracting green bondinvestors

3 Management of the Proceeds
JFM’s Green Bond Working Group will track, monitor andaccount for the allocation of the proceeds

Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria for JFM green bond is as set forth on the table
below
GBP Eligible
Green Project
Category

Sustainable
water andwastewater
management

Eligibility Criteria

Development, construction,
maintenance, updates, operation ofsewerage related assets, which arein line with sewage drainage
standards set by Japanese law
including:
Sewerage Management Related
Facilities
Facility/Equipment
Pipes

January 2020

Environmental
Objective

4 ReportingJFM Green Bond Working Group will conduct a survey onmunicipal borrowers with respect to the environmental impactsof sewerage projects

Alignmentwith UNSDGs

JFM Green Bond Working Group will then report the effective
portfolio for the allocation which only includes projects thatborrowers return effective response

Pollution
Prevention andControl

JFM will publish the following impact report on website annually

Water Resource
Conservation

Amount of net proceeds of the Notes allocatedBreakdown of Effective Portfolio
Expected or estimated KPIs
Case studies of JFM’s lending to sewerage projects
Refinancing rate

Energy use of
sewage sludge,
seweragesludge recycle

7(i) Amount of Loan to Sewerage Projects

Number of Local
Governments

Prefectures

Designated
CitiesCitiesTowns andVillages

Others

Total

14

10

467

283

7

781

Number of Loans

15

18

1,794

625

19

2,471

Loan Amount（JPY million）

2,059.3

10,055.3

245,415.2

23,479.2

2,179.0

283,188.0

Number of Loans
by Loan AmountJPY
2 bn oroverJPY
1 bn or
over

4

30

JPY
JPY
500 mm or 100 mm or
over
over

97

555

Below
JPY
100 mm

Total

1,785

2,471

Number of Local Governments
by Type of Borrower
Others7
1%

Towns andVillages283
36%

Prefectures
14
2%

Government-designated
Cities
10
1%

Cities467
60%

Loan Amount by Type of Borrower(JPY mm)

The total loan amount to sewerage projects for fiscal year 2021 (1 April 2021 to 31 March
2022) (excluding refinance) was JPY 283.2 bn.
The number of local governments was 781, and the number of loans was 2,471. In terms of
the loan amount by types of borrowers, cities were the highest with 87%, followed by towns
and villages with 8%, then government-designated cities with 4%.
In terms of the number of loans by loan amount, JPY 2 bn or over was 4, JPY 1 bn or overwas 30, JPY 500 mm or over was 97, JPY 100 mm or over was 555 and below JPY 100
mm was 1,785.

8

Others2,179.0
Towns and1%
Villages
23,479.2
8%

Prefectures
2,059.3
1%
Governmentdesignated
Cities
10,055.3
4%

Cities245,415.2
87%※ Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

(ii) Breakdown of Green Bond Effective Portfolio
Sewerage
Treatment
Plant

Advanced
Treatment Plant

Purification
CenterPump
Station

Pipes

Others

Total

Number of Projects
by Type

52

1

19

36

110

41

259

Loan Amount by Type(JPY million)

13,582.1

24.2

4,951.9

5,004.8

57,565.5

14,228.5

95,357.0

Loan Amount by Project TypeNew

Renewal

Total

Number of Projects
by Type

111

148

259

Loan Amount by Type(JPY million)

54,030.1

41,326.9

95,357.0

Advancement
Treatment Plant
24.2
Others 0.03%
14,228.5
15%

The Green Bond Working Group has selected 70 local governments
which JFM financed for eligible sewerage projects between 3 February
2022 and 30 March 2022 with the loan amount over JPY 300 mm inprinciple and conducted a survey for the purpose of this green bondreporting. The working group obtained effective response from 62 local
governments (effective response rate:89%) and a total of
approximately JPY 95 bn in loan amount.

（JPY mm)
Sewerage
Treatment Plant
13,582.1
14%
Purification
Center4,951.9
5%

Pump
Station5,004.8
5%

Pipes
57,565.560%※ Does not add up to 100 due to rounding off

New/Renewal percentage

The table above shows the survey results from relevant local
governments.
Regarding the types of projects by loan amount eligible for green bond,pipes cover the largest portion with 60%, followed by seweragetreatment plant with 14%, then purification center and pump station
with 5%.
Additionally, 57% of the loan amount eligible for green bond was
financed to new facilities and 43% was for renewal.
9

Renewal41,326.9
43%

New
54,030.1
57%

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Sewerage Treatment Plant 1
Sewerage Treatment Plant (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Utsunomiya
CityTochigi

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

Water
Management
Capacity(㎥)

Install additional facilities to treat more sewerageas the number of people treated in the area
increases

152,066

62,00040.77

469,342→470,987

82,917,793→88,375,852(annual total)

Fujisawa City

Kanagawa

Construction of a rainwater pool at Tsujido
Purification Center

605,349

426,400

70.44

209,250

11,300(max per day)

Nagano City

NaganoConstruction of septic tanks

15,367

8,600

55.96

6,414

N/A

632,214

390,500

61.77

309,500

154,75050.00

665,050

339,800

51.09

Toyohashi City
(4)

18,480

9,240

50.00

Hatsukaichi
City (1)347,000

156,200

45.01

149,300

8,900

5.96

9,500

4,200

44.21

Toyohashi City
(1)
Toyohashi City
(2)
Toyohashi City
(3)

Hatsukaichi
City (2)

Aichi

Hiroshima

Construction of mainline of wastewater pipe andpumping system to integrate sewage treated at
the aging Noda Sewage Plant into the Nakajima
Sewage Plant

Expansion of sewerage treatment facilities at
Hatsukaichi Purification Center

Hatsukaichi
City (3)Water Quality Water Quality(BOD)(phosphorus)(Year/Period (Year/Period
Average)
Average)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

2.0

Improve living environment by proper
treatment of sewerage due to increase intreated water volume

15.0

N/A

Reduction of pollutant load of effluents bytemporarily storing initial sewerage that flows
into treatment plants in rainy weather andapplying advanced treatment on sunny days
(planned reduction of 89 tons per year)

N/A

N/A

Improvement of water cleansing ratio

13.0

264,099

28,394,823(annual total)

15.0

1.8

Decrease in electricity usage972,281 kWh to 964,602 kWh * Monthly
average
Reduce loads at the Noda Sewerage
Treatment Plant to cope with the aging of the
facility and to make it earthquake-resistant
Sludge recycling rate: 100% (actual)
Sludge energy conversion (Biogas power
generation, carbonized fuel)55,921→57,560

5,451,532→5,611,312(annual total)

15.0

2.0

Improving public health and preserving water
quality in public waters by responding to theincrease in treated water volume associatedwith the expansion of treated areas

Niihama City

Ehime

Build new facilities for joint treatment at Niihama
City Sewerage Treatment Plant to respond to theaging of Niihama City Sanitation Center, which
treats human waste and purification tank sludge

2,851,385

618,800

21.70

74,626→87,510

11,475,632→14,067,100(annual total)

15.0

3.0

Large reduction in electricity consumption
due to abolition of Niihama City Sanitation
Center632,397 kWh (before implementation)→500,000kWh(after implementation) * Monthly average
Sludge recycling rate (cement recycling)
92.9% (before implementation) → 100%(planned after implementation)

Nagasaki City

Nagasaki

Expansion of sewerage treatment facilities at
Western Sewerage Treatment Plant (the receivingside) associated with the integration of seweragetreatment plants in response to aging of facilities

426,229

147,744

34.66

163,403→229,510

82,200→92,400(max per day)

N/A

N/A

Reduce electricity consumption bystreamlining sludge treatment throughintegration and new facilities or equipment

6,181,440

2,327,134

Total Amount of Sewerage Treatment Plant (New) (12 projects)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity10

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Sewerage Treatment Plant 2
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)
JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousand
JPY)

Hakodate City

Hokkaido

Entrustmentofmarketpriceinvestigation service about publicsewerage equipment related withtreatment plant design cost

258

200

77.52

121,511

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Hachinohe City

Aomori

Expansion of water treatment
facilities

883,900

883,900

100.00146,832→148,317

16,735,691→17,124,475(annual total)

15.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Oshu City

Iwate

Renovation of aging electrical andmechanical equipment

87,441

43,40049.63

15,268

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Renovation and renewal of aging
treatment plants

2,197,057

1,049,700

47.78

Fukushima

3.0

N/A

51.15

1.8→0.79
improved

N/A

847,900

24,521,926→25,877,770(annual total)

15.0

1,657,755

171,691→178,800

Iwaki City (1)Iwaki City (2)Mito City

IbarakiRenovation of electric facilities atthe sewerage treatment plant andpumping station

1,298,700

642,000

49.43

216,056

19,985,431(annual total)

15.0

5.2

N/A

0.76

N/A

Utsunomiya

Tochigi

Renewal of equipment that has
exceeded its durable life

261,969

106,000

40.46

469,342→470,987

82,917,793→88,375,852(annual total)

13.0

5.9→5.3
improved

2.0

2.3→2.2
improved

Improvement of living conditions
through proper sewerage treatment

Funabashi City

Chiba

412,848

193,68046.91

110,700

305,020(monthly
average)

10.0

1.2→1.1
improved

1.5

0.87→0.54
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
904,508kWh → 887,894kWh

144,584

144,500

99.94

209,250

35,296,170(annual total)

15.0

8.9

N/A

2.3

N/A

318,039

170,300

53.55

183,630

220,250,013(annual total)

15.0

11.0

N/A

2.4

N/A

Fujisawa City
(1)
Kanagawa
Fujisawa City
(2)

Electrical equipment construction
and B1 fine mesh screen
construction for Nishiura Sewerage
Treatment Plant
Renewal of speed control
equipment and reconstructon of
returning sludge pumps (4 units)
due to aging of the fourth line ofwater treatment at Tsujido
Purification Center
Renewal of aging mechanical /electrical equipment and the final
settling tank of the 1st series ofwater treatment at the Oshimizu
Purification Center

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Renewal of settling basin,
instrumentation equipment, drains
and blowers

Toyama City

Toyama

Detailed design to renovate water
treatment facilities of Hamakurosaki
Purification Center

614,684

289,500

47.10

230,792

N/A

15.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Prevent the suspension of processing
functions from failures by replacementof aging equipment
Sludge recycling rate: 100%(converted to cement)

51,19432,98364.43

258,41042,838,444(annual total)

N/A

6.7→3.6
improved

N/A

1.6

Sludge recycling rate: 88.6%(Compounding fuel and fertilizer)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity11

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Sewerage Treatment Plant 3
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)
JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousand
JPY)

Uchinada Town

Ishikawa

Improve earthquake resistance andrenew equipment of reaction tankfacilities

607,819

340,800

56.07

26,138→27,100

2,573,796→2,754,228(annual total)

15.0

2.7

N/A

N/A

Nagano City (1)Renovation and renewal of aging
East Terminal Sewerage Treatment
Facilities

391,840

168,800

43.08

145,984

21,010,011(annual total)

1.4

1.4→0.75
improved

N/A

12.0→9.95
improved

Nagano City (2)Renovation and renewal ofmechanical and electricalequipment at the Kinasa
Purification Center

215,650

104,254

48.34

448

57,853→60,846(annual total)

15.0

2.6→2.5
improved

N/A

1.3→0.8
improved

Renovation and renewal ofmechanical and electrical facilities
at Shinshu-Shinmachi Purification
Center12,188

5,514

45.24

1,478

154,578(annual total)

15.0

2.2→1.6
improved

N/A

1.2→0.46
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
8,797kWh → 8,140kWh

Nagano City (4)Renewal of pumping equipment at
manhole pump station in
Hirashigaki district

25,214

10,983

43.56

1,160

46,842(annual total)

20.0

7.0→3.9
improved

N/A

3.1

N/A

Nagano City (5)Renewal of manhole pump stationin Asakawa North District

11,594

5,417

46.72

440

20,709→25,548(annual total)

20.0

6.6→2.6
improved

N/A

10.0→2.2
improved

N/A

Matsumoto City
(1)

Renewal of Miyabuchi Purification
Center’s low-level 2nd system’s
primary and final settings, in-house
power generation, and earthquake
resistance of low-level 1st systemsettling basin

Nagano City (3)NaganoNaganoMatsumoto City
(2)
Matsumoto City
(3)
Gifu City (1)Gifu
Gifu City (2)Work on detailed design andconstruct a more earthquake
resistant facility for Ryoshima
Purification Center sludge
equipment, chlorine mixing pond
and discharge culvert
Renewal of mechanical / electricalequipment

Himeji City (1)Himeji City (2)Himeji City (3)Hyogo

Renewal of aging Chubu Treatment
Plant

276,400

109,400

39.58

25,45010,50041.26

40,28023,50058.34

28,87124,80085.90

42,02018,90044.98

344,325

344,322100.00626,560

626,456

99.98

2,076,955

1,028,300

49.51

Sludge recycling rate: 100% (rawcement materials)

125,739

22,199,364(annual total)

15.0

5.4→5.1
improved

N/A

4.3

Stable sewerage treatment can be
performed even in natural disasterevent such as earthquakes by
updating aging facilities andconstructing earthquake-resistantfacilities

75,385

10,236,444(annual total)

15.0

4.2

N/A

0.7→0.6
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
323,356kWh → 307,607kWh

379,200

45,428,707(annual total)

15.0

5.9→3.0
improved

1.5

0.8→0.7
improved

Electricity consumption (annual total)
20,423,858kWh → 20,348,585kWh

479,873

66,009,988→66,488,383(annual total)

15.0

5.3→3.9
improved

3.0

1.1→0.91
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
1,103,216kWh → 1,079,765kWh※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity12

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Sewerage Treatment Plant 4
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Akashi City

Hyogo

Renewal of monitoring and control
systems

Wakayama City
(1)
Wakayama City
(2)

Wakayama

Renovation of sewerage treatment
plants and sewerage pump facilities
that have exceeded durable life

Kure City

Hiroshima

Construction of the monitoring
control panel and settling tankfacility at the purification center

Hiroshima

Renewal of sewerage treatment
facilities (total phosphorus/total
nitrogen measuring instruments) of
the aging Hatsukaichi, Ohno, Yuwa,
and Yoshiwa Purification Centers

Hatsukaichi
City (1)
Hatsukaichi
City (2)Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

860,909436,400

50.69

25,00011,300

45.20

7,000

3,200

45.71

824,077

385,948

46.83

570

200

35.09

37,65030,70081.54

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

32,670277,943(monthly
average)

15.0

7.9

N/A

0.9

Electricity usage (monthly average)
146,010kWh → 136,739kWh
Contributing to the conservation ofwater quality in public water areas byperforming proper sewerage treatment
efficiently by updating aging
equipment

21,085562,960(monthly
average)

15.0

5.5→1.6
improved

0.5

0.56→0.43
improved

N/A

187,049

25,058,654→25,311,507(annual total)

15.0

1.0→0.7
improved

3.0

0.9→0.7
improved

Odor control from sedimentation pond
equipment
Electricity usage (monthly average)
1,449,699kWh → 1,440,479kWh

68,999→72,814

6,917,810→7,300,300(annual total)

15.0

10.5

2.0

1.8

Improvement of public health andpreservation of water quality in public
watersReduction in CO2 emissions byreplacing heavy oil boiler models with
air conditioners that comply with theGreen Purchasing Law
Sludge recycling rate: 100% (cement
and fertilizer)
Solar power
Effective use of treated water
Effective use of treated water intreatment plants
Reduction of greenhouse gas
emissions by reducing the scale of
new facilities and introducing energysaving equipment

Takamatsu
City

KagawaRebuilding the air conditioning
system at the East Sewerage
Treatment Plant

997,997

404,400

40.52

267,444→288,680

35,952,500(annual total)

2.4

4.4

0.79

0.79

Marugame
City

KagawaConstruction of new purification
center to respond to the aging andimprove earthquake resistance

1,171,816

538,400

45.95

42,3007,678,000(annual total)

15.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

3.0

N/A

Reduction in electricity use at disposalsites through integration of facilities

1.7

N/A

3.2→2.93
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
8,719kWh → 8,595kWh

0.8→0
improved

N/A

2.62→2.49
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
5,650kWh → 5,580kWh

Expansion of Onishi Water
311,921
3,495
Treatment Center to respond to the139,60265,09046.63→806,400
15.0→6,140increase in treated water volume(annual total)
Development of drainage facilities
when integrating agriculturalcommunity drainage equipment
Imabari City
1,122
226,800(Setozaki Treatment Area) with
2,400
1,150
47.92
15.0
(2)
→1,870(annual total)
specified environmental
conservation public sewer pipes
Ehime(Iguchi Treatment Area)
Renewal of water treatment
Imabari City
facilities at the agricultural
63,592
15,04014,300
95.08
791
20.0
(3)
community drainage treatment plant(annual total)(Kyuo)
Renewal of water treatment
Imabari City
facilities at the agricultural
23,30635,58533,600
94.42
269
20.0
(4)
community drainage treatment plant(annual total)(Munakata)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity
Imabari City
(1)

13

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Sewerage Treatment Plant 5
Sewerage Treatment Plant (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityTotal Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Prefecture

Project Description

Sasebo City

Nagasaki

Renewal of aging equipment andpower generation facilities that haveexceeded their durable life

2,379,899

2,093,700

87.97

Yatsushiro
City

Kumamoto

Replacing aging equipment withnew ones at the water treatment
center25,505

10,60041.56

19,176,645

11,254,997

Total Amount of Sewerage Treatment Plants(Renewal) (40 projects)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

145,475

12,598,800→12,879,924(annual total)

15.0

2.0

N/A

1.69

Electricity usage (monthly average)
400,807kWh → 386,755kWh
Gas generated during the sludge
treatment process is used as fuel for
power generators

45,959→46,139

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Introduce equipment that uses lesselectricity

14

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Advanced Treatment Plant
Advanced Treatment Plant (Renewal)
JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

46.91

110,700

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousand
JPY)

Funabashi City

Chiba

Mechanical and electric construction
for B1 fine screen at Nishiura
Sewerage Treatment Plant

51,60624,21051,60624,210Total Amount of Advanced Treatment Plant(Renewal) (1 project)

15

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

1,603,756→1,690,013(monthly
average)

1.2→1.1
improved

1.5

0.87→0.54
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
904,508kWh → 887,894kWh

10.0

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Purification Center 1
Purification Center (New)

Borrowing
EntityMatsumoto
City

Prefecture

Project Description

NaganoDetailed design work for constructionof sludge digestion tank at Ryoshima
Purification Center

Hiroshima

Establishment of sludge treatment
related facilities (gravitational
concentration) at Ohno Purification
Center to cope with the increase insludge volume caused by the
expansion of treatment areas

Hatsukaichi
City (1)
Hatsukaichi
City (2)Total Amount of Purification Center (New) (3 projects)

Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

18,35017,40094.82

39,00017,50044.87

139,100

11,100196,450

46,000Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousand
JPY)

BOD
Water
Phosphorus
PlannedManagement(Year/Period[Year/Period
Capacity
Average)
Average](㎥)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

75,385

10,236,444(annual total)

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate: 99.9% (use indigestion gas and use of dehydrated
cake as raw material for cement)
Electricity usage (monthly average)
323,356kWh → 307,607kWh

13,857→14,320

1,284,576→1,327,498(annual total)

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate: 100%(composting)
Improving public health, preserving
water quality in public waters

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

Covered
Area
Population

7.98

Purification Center (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntitySapporo City

Asahikawa
City

Prefecture

Hokkaido

Hokkaido

Project Description

Renovation of sludge incineration
facilities and introduction of waste
heat generation equipment

The aging No. 1 sludge incinerator, abubble-type fluidized bed furnace, hasbeen downsized (from 80 t/day to 60
t/day) for expected reduction insludge volume, and replaced with asupercharged incinerator that reduces
greenhouse gas emissions

1,519,500

2,502,391

502,641

1,062,000

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

33.08

42.44

N/A

312,600

N/A

49,932,380→51,531,342(annual total)

N/A

15.0

※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

16

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

N/A

N/A

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

N/A

N/A

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
274,044kWh → 127,783kWh
Greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions(monthly average) 196t → 115t
Sludge recycling rate: 100% (backfillingmaterials and cement materials for civilengineering work)
Sludge energy conversion (incineration
waste heat generation (total output 400
kW))

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
1,193,407kWh → 1,160,596kWh
Greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions(monthly average) 1,350.40t → 686.25t
Sludge recycling rate
48.4% to 50% (converted to cement(incinerated ash))
Sewerage treatment water used forsnowmelt
Digestion gas generated from sludge
used as an auxiliary fuel for incineration
Electricity consumption by the entire
incineration system can be reduced byusing sludge incineration heat(approximately 31.2%)

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Purification Center 2
Purification Center (Renewal)
Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

Construction of digestion tank fordigestion gas power generation
project at Takase Sewerage
Treatment Plant

188,576

81,50043.22

251,800

2,637,280(annual total)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate: 100%(converted to cement)
Energy conversion from sludge(digestion gas power generation)

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Funabashi City

Chiba

Fujisawa City

Kanagawa

Renewal of sludge treatment facility at
Tsujido Purification Center

11,65911,40097.78

209,250

35,296,170(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate: 100%(construction aggregates)

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Renovation and renewal of
dewatering and deodorization
facilities, improvement of earthquake
resistance and strengthening ofsludge building

1,513,216

712,68647.10

230,792

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sludge recycling rate: 100%(converted to cement)

Toyama City

ToyamaRenewal of excess sludge pullout
valves at the Osawano Purification
Center

4,455

4,232

94.99

17,221

2,007,444(annual total)

N/A

9.8→9.6
improved

N/A

2.9→1.8
improved

Electricity usage (monthly average)
100,998kWh → 97,621kWh
Sludge recycling rate: 100% (fertilizer
conversion)

Wakayama
City

Wakayama

Renovation of terminal seweragefacilities that have exceeded durablelife

96,90039,60040.87

21,085

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Improvement of earthquake
resistance and extend durable life forwater treatment facilities

70,36670,366100.00Tottori

3,354

31,012→32,546(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
23,733kWh → 21,724kWh
Sludge recycling rate: 100%(construction materials, etc.)

Tottori City (1)Tottori City (2)Project Description

74,72574,725100.00Kure City

Hiroshima

Construction of sludge facility at the
purification center

574,070

307,14153.50

187,049

25,058,654→25,311,507(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Hatsukaichi
City

Hiroshima

Renewal of sludge treatment related
facilities (dehydrators) at the aging
Hatsukaichi Purification Center

490,520

220,700

44.99

53,272→55,921

5,296,302→5,559,666(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Iwakuni City

Yamaguchi

Upgrading of sludge dehydrators at
the aging Ichimonji Terminal
Treatment Plant

131,760

59,45045.12

43,2955,486,110(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

17

Other positive environmental impact

Promotion of effective utilization ofsludge by improving sludge properties
after dehydration, and reduction inodors from facilities
Electricity usage (monthly average)
1,449,699kWh → 1,440,479kWh
Sludge recycling rate: 100%(composting and conversion to
cement)Improvement of public health, andpreservation of water quality in public
watersSludge recycling rate: 100%(composting and conversion to
cement)Electricity usage (monthly average)
219,496kWh →196,769kWh
Sludge recycling rate: 100%(composting)(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Purification Center 3
Purification Center (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

KagawaConstruction of the new purification
center to respond to the aging andimprove earthquake resistance

Marugame City
(1)
Marugame City
(2)
Marugame City
(3)

Imabari City

Ehime

Renewal of sludge treatment facilities
at Imabari Sewerage Treatment
Center (Sludge concentration facilities,
sludge digestion facilities, dehydrators,
etc.)

Total Amount of Purification Center(Renewal) (16 projects)

Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

1,171,816

538,400

45.95

1,339,720

618,000

46.13

908,638

419,700

46.19

409,398

183,310

11,007,710

4,905,851

44.78

Covered
Area
Population

42,30074,544→83,020

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

N/A

13,442,950(annual total)

N/A

N/A

※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

18

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
by downsizing facilities and installingenergy-saving equipment

N/A

Expected to reduce annual sludge
generation by about 350 tons byadopting a dehydrator with lower
moisture content
Sludge recycling rate
8.13% (composting) → 38.09%(composting and conversion to cement)
Electricity usage (monthly average)
241,745kWh → 210,300kWh
Digestion gas power generation(electricity generation = reduction of
769,000 kwh/year)

N/A

N/A

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 1
Pump Station (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Chiba

Construction of a new pumping
station to respond to thereorganization of the public sewerage(rainwater) drainage area (forced
drainage is used since naturaldrainage is difficult due to the low
ground level of the target drainage
area)

Ichikawa City
(1)
Ichikawa City
(2)

Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

106,000

86,00081.13

828,550

414,200

49.99

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
Phosphorus
PlannedManagement(Year/Period[Year/Period
Capacity
Average)
Average](㎥)(mg/L)(mg/L)

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Efficient removal of inland water in anarea of about 70 ha where urban
functions and population areconcentrated

Tokyo

Expansion of rainwater pool (19,700m3) to prevent deterioration ofpollution load during rainy weather
caused by discharged water

1,301,685

203,100

15.60

304,853

65,967,170(annual total)

N/A

N/A

Contribute to the improvement of riverwater quality

Matsusaka
City

Mie

Construction of new inflow sewer
pipes, machinery building, dust
removal equipment, container
building, machinery and electricalequipment for rainwater pumping
stations

669,730

306,900

45.82

N/A

1,175,040(max per day)

N/A

N/A

Measures to prevent flooding of urban
areas by increasing the removal ofinland water

Wakayama
City

Wakayama

Construction of Rainwater Pumping
Station to Prevent flood due to Heavy
Rain

635,000

288,600

45.45

N/A

604,800(max per day)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Hatsukaichi
City

Hiroshima

New manhole pump for pumping
sewerage to treatment plant, etc.

245,226

108,600

44.29

69,7786,539,345→6,921,118(annual total)

N/A

N/A

Improve public health and preserve
water quality in public waters

Imabari City

Ehime

Development of a wastewater relay
pumping station that is necessary forsewerage development to the Imabari
sewerage treatment area’s eastern
treatment system

411,000

186,780

45.45

7,740

79,570(annual total)

N/A

N/A

Improve the living environment, andconserve water quality by switchingfrom septic tanks / pumping treatment
to sewerage treatment

4,197,191

1,594,180

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

240,000

63.12

9,200

Hachioji City

Total Amount of Pump Station (New) (7 projects)

Pump Station (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityHakodate City

Prefecture

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousand
JPY)

Hokkaido

Construction of electrical facilities at
Yukawa Pumping Station.
Construction of private power
generation facility at aging Minato
Pumping Station and Sumiyoshi
Pumping Station

380,218

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

70,761(monthly
average)

N/A※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

19

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
16,969kWh → 15,166kWh

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 2
Pump Station (Renewal)
JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousand
JPY)

Hachinohe
City

AomoriRenewal of substations at rainwater
pumping station

101,920

101,920100.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Hitachinaka
City

IbarakiRenewal of electrical equipment at
wastewater relay pump station

44,04331,300

71.07

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Chiba City

Chiba

Renewal of aging settling basin
facilities at Hibino Pump Station

59,48029,740

50.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tachikawa
City

Tokyo

Renovation of lighting fixtures(Fluorescent, mercury lamp → LED)

11,418

11,40099.84

185,201

80,000(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
reducing power consumption *※4,706kWh → 4,667kWh(monthly average)

Fujisawa City

Kanagawa

Mechanical work to remodel settlingbasin equipment at Oba Pumping
Station, and electrical work to
remodel the aging loading equipment

77,04876,90099.81

47,9005,575,340(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Waterproofing of facilities, renovation
and renewal of private power
generation facilities

227,247

107,02847.10

230,792

N/A

15.0

N/A

N/A

N/A

Prevention of flood damage tofacilities due to flooding
Sludge recycling rate: 100%(converted to cement)

Toyama City

ToyamaImproving anti-corrosion andearthquake resistance in the Iwase
Wastewater Relay Pump Station

127,700

61,16547.90

241,189

40,831,000(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
82,997kWh → 75,996kWh

Toyohashi City

Aichi

Improving earthquake resistance offacilities

166,005

83,00050.00

264,099

1,126,606→1,314,840(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Okazaki City

Aichi

Renewal of electrical equipment suchas monitoring boards, automatic finedust remover, residue discharger,
residue washing dehydrator, etc.

25,00012,500

50.00

3,454

1,120,281(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Tokai City

Aichi

Longer durable life and earthquake
resistance for rainwater pumping
stations and treatment plants

1,073,860

486,100

45.27

98,721

9,131,895(annual total)

15.0

5.45

1.0

0.98

N/A

20

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 3
Pump Station (Renewal)
Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Other positive environmental impact

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Ise City

Mie

Renewal of rainwater pumping
stations for basin-related publicsewerage projects

2,503,663

97,6003.90

65,940→67,728

6,016,788→6,186,010(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
10,411kWh → 6,711kWh

Kakogawa City

Hyogo

Renewal of mechanical and electricalequipment at the aging pump station

770,591

310,800

40.33

25,0008,934,109→9,000,000(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Energy-saving benefits of upgrading
equipment
Electricity usage (monthly average)
37,156kWh → 37,000kWh

Wakayama
City (1)Renewal of settling basin equipmentthat has exceeded its durable life

176,550

80,50045.60

Wakayama
City (2)Renewal of outflow gate facilities thathave exceeded its durable life

41,80019,10045.69

N/A

21,573(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
6,715kWh → 6,270kWh

Wakayama
City (3)Reconstruction of rainwater pumpequipment that has exceeded its
durable life

91,55041,60045.44

Wakayama
City (4)Reconstruction of rainwater pumpequipment that has exceeded its
durable life

178,780

81,30045.47

N/A

12,346,910→16,400,980(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
16,945kWh → 16,461kWh

Wakayama
City (5)Renovation of pumping stationequipment that has exceeded its
durable life

15,453

7,000

45.30

83,929105,448(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
10,840kWh → 9,950kWh

Wakayama
City (6)Renovation for facilities that haveexceeded its durable life of thepumping station

10,780

9,800

90.91

21,085

16,515(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
5,386kWh → 4,363kWh

Tottori City (1)Expansion of the pumping station toprevent flood damage

98,15998,159100.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Expansion of the pumping station toprevent flood damage, improvementof earthquake resistance andextension of durable life

258,685258,685

100.0054,926488,212(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Electricity usage (monthly average)
34,972kWh → 33,825kWh

Project Description

Wakayama

TottoriTottori City (2)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity21

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pump Station 4
Pump Station (Renewal)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hatsukaichi
City (1)Project Description

Total Project
Cost(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount(thousandJPY)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Covered
Area
Population

BOD
Water
PlannedManagement[Year/Period
Capacity
Average](㎥)(mg/L)

Renovation and renewal of returning
sludge pumps at the aging Ohno
Purification Center

9,130

4,100

44.91

12,657→13,857

1,243,043→1,360,895(annual total)

N/A

BOD
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

Phosphorus(Year/Period
Average)(mg/L)

Phosphorus
Actual[Maximummonthly
results](mg/L)
after
treatment

N/A

N/A

N/A

Other positive environmental impact

Improve public health, and preserve
water quality in public waters

Hiroshima
Hatsukaichi
City (2)Renewal of sewerage pumps at Yuwa
Purification Center and excess sludge
pumps at the aging Hatsukaichi
Purification Center

13,382

12,40092.66

55,744→58,374

5,573,685→5,836,651(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Iwakuni City
(1)

Detailed design work to replace the
manhole pump building at the Iwakuni
Minami Seseragi Center with asewerage pump building

9,000

4,500

50.00

43,295

791,040(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Renovation of rainwater drainage
facilities

242,140

73,027

30.16

8,856

537,600(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reduce flood damage
Electricity usage (monthly average)
26,229kWh → 25,000kWh

Yamaguchi
Iwakuni City
(2)

Takamatsu
City

KagawaRenovation of aging facilities

241,133

125,300

51.96

N/A

41,339,683→42,931,928(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reduce CO2 emissions by restoring
functions and installing energy-saving
equipment

Marugame City

KagawaRenewal of each pumping station
facility

1,171,816

538,400

45.95

48,7738,657,120→9,357,360(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reduce CO2 emissions by installingenergy-saving equipment
Electricity usage (monthly average)
115,401kWh → 114,555kWh

Imabari City

Ehime

Expansion of rainwater pumps at the
Tenpozan Drainage Pump Station.
Renewal of equipment at pumpstations in the city to improve
earthquake resistance

399,800

180,970

45.27

87,2152,764,880(annual total)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Prevention of urban flooding damage
by expanding rainwater pumps
Electricity usage (monthly average)
25,543kWh → 24,047kWh

Yatsushiro
City

Kumamoto

Renewal of diesel engines for existing
pumps

444,068

226,300

50.96

11,275

998,631(monthly
average)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
reducing emissions and electricity
consumption
Electricity usage (monthly average)
27,791kWh → 25,647kWh

8,970,419

3,410,594

Total Amount of Pump Stations (Renewal)(29 projects)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity22

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 1
Pipes (New)
Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Newly
constructedpipe length(m)

Covered Area
Population

Positive environment impact

Development of undeveloped lines

123,250

114,633

93.01

282

141

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 13,156 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of living environment through proper treatment of
miscellaneous wastewater by flushing

Hokkaido

Construction of new rainwater pipes

281,502

218,502

77.62

685

95

The amount of treated water will increase by 10,611 m3 due to theconstruction of new sewer pipes (total estimated value for 2021 years).

Tomakomai City

Hokkaido

Construction of new pipes

1,622,105

1,176,800

72.55

6,125

167,789

Water quality conservation and flood countermeasures for public waterareas

Hachinohe City

Aomori

Extension of pipes to cover unreached areas

1,919,980

1,919,980

100.0014,2101,141→1,485The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are164,210 m3 (annual total).

Morioka City

Iwate

Construction of new sewerage pipes

1,623,240

975,000

60.07

7,818

258,780

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 168,325 m3 (annual total).
Conserving water quality in public water areas and ensuring a sanitarywater environment

Oshu City

Iwate

Construction of new pipes

1,147,040

719,400

62.72

8,206

50,678The amount of treated water increased by 146,438㎥ (annual total) due tothe construction of new sewer pipes
Decrease in sewerage discharge due to improved sewerage coverage
Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions due to less business vehicles
involved in water pumping

Sendai City

MiyagiConstruct new sewer pipes to secure a backup
function in the event of a disaster on the mainline sewer pipes

880,413441,956

50.20

2,873

717,850→755,041

N/A

93,80878,20083.36

639

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

Hakodate City

Hokkaido

Asahikawa City

Iwaki City (1)Development of sewerage pipes to cover
undeveloped sewerage areas
Iwaki City (2) *171,691→178,800
295,503240,600

81.42

N/A

193,080

87,000

45.06

31

N/A

93,71067,800

72.35

N/A

N/A

1,506,000

1,131,600

75.14

7,866

215,632→216,056

The volume of treated water will increase by 1,599 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes

Fukushima
Iwaki City (3)N/A

Maintenance of rainwater pipes, etc. to reduce
flood damage
Iwaki City (4) *Mito City

IbarakiConstruction of new pipes

The amount of treated water increased by 361,210㎥ (annual total) due tothe construction of new sewer pipes.
Improvement of public health and water quality in public water areas dueto the increase in the households using flush toilets※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity* Borrowing entity whose newly constructed pipe length is not available. The number is not included in the calculation of total newly constructed pipe length on the summary page23

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 2
Pipes (New)
Project Description

Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Newly
constructedpipe length(m)

Covered Area
Population

IbarakiInstall sewerage pipes for uncovered areas, andrainwater pipes to prevent flooding

2,000,790

1,151,800

57.57

4,114

99,752

Conserve water quality in public waters
Reduce flood damage

Tochigi

Construct new sewer pipes in uncovered areas
under the public sewerage system and specificenvironmental protection sewerage systems

439,624

396,400

90.17

7,159

470,987

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 5,458,059 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of living environment by proper treatment of sewerage

Expansion of sewerage development inurbanization control areas and promotion of theconnection to sewerage pipes (flushing)

2,642,651

1,761,500

66.66

8,340

Construction of new pipes for areas wheresewer pipes can continue to use the pipes evenin the event of an earthquake

148,335

95,80064.58

239

Construction of sewer pipes to drain water into
public sewer pipes, and installing rainwater
pipes to remove rainwater

496,100

27.42

1,809,264

Construction of rainwater pipes, etc.

297,382

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Hitachinaka City

Utsunomiya City

Tokorozawa City
(1)
Saitama
Tokorozawa City
(2)
Yashio City (1)SaitamaYashio City (2)Chiba City

Chiba

Ichikawa City (1)Reduce deaths and diseases caused by water pollution through ensuring
public health321,555

2,502,097

900,900

49.79

225,480

75.82

1,715,800

68.57

Reduce marine litter and prevent eutrophication by improving water quality
in public water areas

5,258

72,240→75,036

631

N/A

Reduce of flood damage

3,210

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 427,652 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of water quality in public water areas, by switching fromindependent septic tanks, which have a large environmental impact, toregional public sewerage systems
The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 163,867 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of water quality in public water areas, by switching fromindependent septic tanks, which have a large environmental impact, toregional public sewerage systems

11,190Construction of new wastewater pipes inuncovered regional public sewerage systems
Ichikawa City (2)ChibaIchikawa City (3)*3,334,380

2,495,100

74.83

3,164

1,230

591,082

346,600

58.64

N/A

N/A

96,62090,600

93.77

N/A

N/A

Construction of new rainwater pipes in
undeveloped areas of public sewage systems

Ichikawa City (4)*Positive environment impact

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 361,770 m3 (annual total).

The number of damages has declined in the densely populated areas
where rainwater pipes have been installed

Funabashi City

Chiba

Constructin of the sewerage systems

4,243,633

2,650,300

62.45

9,743

583,739→588,943

Improvement of water quality

Matsudo City

Chiba

Construction of pipes

2,582,831

1,655,100

64.08

11,917436,517

The volume of treated water will increase by 780,000 m3 (monthly
average) due to the construction of new sewer pipes
Improving environmental health by expanding sewerage systems※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity* Borrowing entity whose newly constructed pipe length is not available. The number is not included in the calculation of total newly constructed pipe length on the summary page24

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 3
Pipes (New)
Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Newly
constructedpipe length(m)

Covered Area
Population

Positive environment impact

Construction of new sewer pipes

1,455,110

1,048,300

72.04

6,648

388,695→390,717

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 571,631 m3 (annual total).

Tokyo

Construction of new sewer pipes

135,871

125,100

92.07

378

557,785→557,917

The amount of treated water will increase by 2m3 (monthly average) due
to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Improvement of water quality in rivers that meets environmental standards
due to the improvement of public healthTachikawa City

Tokyo

Construction of facilities for sending water fromthe Nishikicho Sewerage Treatment Plant to the
Kitatama No. 2 Water Reclamation Center

231,029

173,000

74.88

3,400

97,218

Improvement of the water environment through the integration of thewatershed into the Kitatama No. 2 Water Reclamation Center andadvanced treatment of wastewater

Fujisawa City

Kanagawa

Construction of new sewer pipes (for uncovered
areas)

657,153558,200

84.94

603

422,423

The volume of treated water will increase by 3,103m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Extension of pipes

212,151

153,101

72.17

583

N/A

Toyama City

ToyamaConstruction of connecting pipes fromconsolidation and abolition of seweragetreatment facilities. Construction of rainwater
pipes to prevent flooding

1,877,055

937,836

49.96

2,619

382,711

N/A

Nagano City

NaganoConstruction of sewer pipes

1,304,377

721,958

55.35

2,898

335,729

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 3,800m3 (annual total).
Improvement in washing ratio

194,950

97,60050.06

NaganoConstruction of a new Chikuma wastewater
mainline associated with road improvement504

125,739

Prevents discharge of untreated water into rivers from heavy rain

140,000

63,00045.00

27,40925,600

93.40
5,510

379,200

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 137,695m3 (annual total).

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Kashiwa City

Chiba

Hachioji City

Matsumoto City
(1)
Matsumoto City
(2)

Project Description

Gifu City (1)Gifu

Construct sewer pipes and drainage channels

Gifu City (2)502,555

Toyohashi City
(1)

Construction of rainwater pipes

1,589,431

327,500

798,902

65.17

50.26

1,917

Aichi
Toyohashi City
(2)

Okazaki City

Aichi

Prevention of flood damage due to heavy rain
Sludge recycling rate: 100% (converted to cement)

264,099
Extension of pipes

834,349

426,460

51.11

6,120

Construction of new sewer pipes

603,307331,000

54.86

3,806

The volume of treated water will increase by 13,684 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Preventing deterioration of public health339,763※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

25

The volume of treated water will increase by 13,684m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Reduction of flood damage
Reduction of the load on the treatment plant by switching from the
combined system to the separate system

N/A(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 4
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Project Description

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 139,669 m3 (annual total).
Alleviation of water pollution in lakes and rivers by expanding thecoverage of the public sewerage system, which reduces the number ofhouseholds using septic tanks and vault toilets

Construct new sewer to reduce sewerage
uncovered areas

373,501

320,500

85.81

3,708

98,721

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 137,591 m3 (annual total).

Mie

Construction of new sewerage pipes to improvewater environment in uncovered areas

6,154,648

3,469,800

56.38

28,956

249,091

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 572,411 m3 (annual total).

Mie

Construct new pipes under the regional
sewerage system project

2,503,663

1,308,300

52.26

11,63867,728The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 169,222 m3 (annual total).
Conservation of water quality in public water areas

2,091,128

1,178,700

56.37

8,185

1,127

Mie

Construction of new pipes
198,647

151,100

76.06

1,171

N/A

934,048

640,100

68.53

4,966

445

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 308,856 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of water quality and living conditions in public water areas byincreasing the sewerage covered area population

157,500

157,500

100.0058,80058,800100.0013,000114

The volume of treated water will increase by 912 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Prevention of pollution of public water areas due to runoff of household
wastewater, etc.

62,80062,800100.00

194,085

194,078

100.003,468

479,873645,862

645,844

100.00

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 478,395 m3 (annual total).

2,703,311

1,502,700

55.59

7,933

507

The volume of treated water will increase by 9,352 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Conservation of water quality in public water areas such as rivers andnearby waterways

1,435,598

926,900

64.57

6,430

91,85947,50051.71

406

Yokkaichi City

Ise City

Osaka

Development of undeveloped public sewerage
areas

Shimamoto
Town (1)Osaka

Construction of sewerage pipes to expand
sewerage connected areas

Shimamoto
Town (3)Himeji City (1)
Hyogo

Hyogo

New construction of sewer pipes in undeveloped
areas

Wakayama City
(1)
Wakayama

N/A

Construction of new pipes

Himeji City (2)Wakayama City
(2)

Positive environment impact

10,251

Aichi

Kakogawa City

Covered Area
Population

0.05

Tokai City

Shimamoto
Town (2)Newlyconstructedpipe length(m)

1,011,500

Construction of new pipes

Yao City

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

1,873,753,985

Aichi

Matsusaka City
(2)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

59,659→62,575

Hekinan City

Matsusaka City
(1)

Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

Construction of new sewer pipes to cover moreareas and prevent flood

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 224,006 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of the environment of public waters
137,018※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

26

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 14,144 m3 (annual total).
Improvement of the environment of public waters

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 5
Pipes (New)
Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Newly
constructedpipe length(m)

Covered Area
Population

Positive environment impact

Expand sewer pipes to uncovered areas

161,715

161,715100.00

227

32

N/A

Hiroshima

Construction of new pipes

492,318

401,146

81.48

4,618

187,049

The volume of treated water will increase by 679 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Improvement of water environment

417,552

312,452

74.83

Hiroshima

Construction of new pipes

5,814

350,448→351,267

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 83,302 m3 (annual total).

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Tottori City

Tottori

Kure City

Project Description

Fukuyama City
(1)
Fukuyama City(2)

334,029

198,529

59.43

Hatsukaichi City
(1)

348,791

219,900

63.05

Hiroshima

70,467→74,238

Construction of pipes

Hatsukaichi City
(2)
Shimonoseki
City

2,246

Yamaguchi

Construction of the surfaces of the sewer pipes
to increase the sewerage coverage rate

Yamaguchi

Construct new public sewer pipes

Iwakuni City (1)Iwakuni City (2)1,487,110

969,600

65.20

5,957

470,200

470,200

100.003,943

626

1,077,768

509,222

47.25

2,115

N/A

677,721280,123

41.33

1,246

N/A

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 108,465 m3 (annual total).
The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 287,679 m3 (annual total).
The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 86,826 m3 (annual total).
Conservation of water quality in public waters

N/A

Aizumi Town

Tokushima

Construction of pipes, pavement restoration
work, etc.

117,700

76,200

64.74

952

4,150
→4,275

Marugame City

KagawaConstruction of new sewer pipes

908,638

419,700

46.19

1,058

48,773

Construction to integrate agricultural community
drainage facilities (Miyawaki Treatment Area)
with public sewer pipes (Onishi Treatment Area)

4,200

2,600

61.90

89

3,495
→3,8005,545

78,039→89,160

The volume of treated water will increase by 4,239 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Improvement of the living environment and preservation of water quality byswitching from purification tanks / pumping treatment to wastewater
treatment method

2,800

The volume of treated water will increase by 648 m3 (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.
Improvement of the living environment and preservation of water quality byswitching from purification tanks / pumping treatment to wastewater
treatment method

Imabari City (1)Imabari City (2)748,217

Ehime

461,260

61.65

Development of sewer pipes in uncovered areas
Imabari City (3)118,300

86,42073.05

943※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

27

Conservation of water environment
The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 160,150 m3 (annual total).
Creating a comfortable living environment by preserving water quality inpublic water areas
The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 14,000 m3 (annual total).
Reducing electricity consumption and stabilizing water treatment at
decommissioned treatment plants by connecting and integrating treatmentsites with public sewage systems

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 6
Pipes (New)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Niihama City

Ehime

Construction of new pipes

NagasakiConstruction of pipes

Project Description

Nagasaki City
(1)
Nagasaki City
(2)

Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Newly
constructedpipe length(m)

Covered Area
Population

Positive environment impact

2,851,385

618,800

21.70

3,481

74,626→87,510

The amount of treated water will increase by 7,300 t (monthly average)
due to the construction of new sewer pipes.

41,85534,500

82.43

774

N/A

N/A

435,288

150,885

34.66

710

341,431

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 3,179 m3 (annual total).

Yatsushiro City

Kumamoto

Development of sewer pipes to promote thespread of sewerage systems

1,603,246

1,011,300

63.08

4,820

59,567→59,800

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 69,715 m3 (annual total).
Conservation of environment and water quality

Kagoshima City

Kagoshima

Construction of new sewer pipes facilities

1,830,044

1,168,700

63.86

7,308

469,000

The amount of treated water to be increased by the construction of new
sewer pipes are 153,221 m3 (annual total).

1,945,718,579

46,169,882

Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Water treated(m3)
Actual/Planned/EstimatedPositive environment impact

Total Amount of Pipes (New) (73 projects)

Pipes (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Asahikawa City

Hokkaido

Renewal of sewer pipes

332,644

263,598

79.24

45,720(annual total)

Prevention of serious accidents and outages caused by aging seweragefacilities (about 1.6 km of replacement)

Hakodate City

Hokkaido

Renovation (replacement and rehabilitation) of
aging pipe facilities

813,492

647,067

79.54

206,650,000(annual total)

Reduction of road subsidence, reduction of rainwater inflow into pipes

Hachinohe City

AomoriRenovation of pipes

201,600

201,600

100.0017,124,475(annual total)

Morioka City

Iwate

Renewal of aging pipes and manhole openings

1,623,240

211,400

13.02

39,933,047(annual total)

Mito City

IbarakiRenovation of aging pipe-related equipment

38,20038,200100.0019,985,431(annual total)

N/A

Utsunomiya City

Tochigi

Renovation of aged sewer pipes in publicsewerage areas and improve earthquake
resistance for pipes

158,606

123,200

77.68

88,375,852(annual total)

N/A

Chiba City

Chiba

Renovation of aging sewer pipes and improving
earthquake resistance of pipes

909,864

478,360

52.57

N/A

Prevention of soil contamination caused by sewage outflow from damaged
areas caused by aging, etc.
Reduction of flood damage

Project Description※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

28

N/A

Ensuring public water quality and sanitary water environment

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 7
Pipes (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Ichikawa City (1)Ichikawa City (2)ChibaIchikawa City (3)Project Description

Make sewer pipes (which were installed inaccordance with the former earthquake-resistant
standards and laid under emergency
transportation routes or as sewerage treatment
routes from shelters) earthquake-resistant andinstall manhole toilets

Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Water treated(m3)
Actual/Planned/Estimated

209,018

120,300

57.55

N/A
Ensuring public health and preserving water quality in the event of anearthquake

48,03029,80062.04

N/A

Renovation and renewal of aging seweragefacilities

55,892

47,20084.45

N/A

Ensuring public health and preserving water quality in public waters

Curbing soil pollution

Funabashi City

Chiba

Renovate and upgrade aging sewerage systems

306,628

212,000

69.14

N/A

Hachioji CityTokyo

Upgrade manhole pumps

62,44718,50029.63

65,967,170(annual total)

209,256

156,000

74.55

1,405,527,552(annual total)Tokyo

Renovation of the aging Midorikawa trunk line
after its standard durable life (50 years)

Tachikawa
City (1)Tachikawa
City (2)Positive environment impact

174,961

92,70052.98

1,109,293,056(annual total)

Improving the water quality of rivers that meets environmental standards by
updating facilities appropriately

Prevention of soil contamination caused by sewerage spilling from a pipe
damaged by an earthquake or other natural disasterFujisawa City

Kanagawa

Make aging pipes earthquake-proof

343,196

310,100

90.36

55,838,675(annual total)

N/A

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Renovation and renewal of pipes and manhole
pump equipment

31,87022,999

72.17

N/A

N/A

Toyama City

ToyamaRenovation of aging sewer pipes

1,504,071

881,894

58.63

57,689,007(annual total)

N/A

Nagano City

NaganoUpgrading sewer pipes

1,134,889

961,674

84.74

N/A

N/A

Improvement of pipes and earthquake
countermeasures for pipeline facilities based on
the results of surveys conducted to ensure thesafety of lifelines

511,506

342,600

66.98

Nagano22,199,364(annual total)

Prevention of sewerage outflow in the event of an earthquake or othernatural disaster by replacing aging sewer pipes and improving earthquakeresistance

56,930,753(annual total)

N/A

28,394,823(annual total)

N/A

Matsumoto City
(1)
Matsumoto City
(2)
Gifu City (1)
Gifu

Aichi

236,500

45.58

368,826

294,600

79.88

Replacement of sewer pipes

Gifu City (2)Toyohashi City

518,831Make highly important pipe earthquake-proof

709,274

378,800

53.41

731,650

369,148

50.45※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity29

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Pipes 8
Pipes (Renewal)
Total Project
Cost(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount(JPY 1,000)

JFM LoanAmount/Total Project
Cost
(%)

Water treated(m3)
Actual/Planned/EstimatedPositive environment impact

Renovation and renewal of sewer pipes

1,990,398

1,446,700

72.68

N/A

N/A

Mie

Upgrading of sewerage manhole pumps

2,503,663

2,000

0.08

6,186,010(annual total)

N/A

Yao City

Osaka

Renovation and renewal of old pipes

376,987

376,900

99.98

6,128
(annual total)

Preventing road collapse accidents by improving the strength of aging
pipes

Higashiosaka
City

Osaka

Updating pipes

1,411,606

1,072,600

75.98

102,437,438(annual total)

Upgrading earthquake resistance and treatment capacity

234,947

116,800

49.71

4,295
(annual total)

37,95034,50090.91

766(annual total)

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Okazaki City

Aichi

Ise City

Project Description

Wakayama City
(1)
Wakayama

Renewal of pipes that exceeded its durable life

Wakayama City
(2)
Tottori City (1)Maintenance of gutters and rainwater pipes toprevent flood damage in urban areas,
improvement of earthquake resistance andexpansion of durable life of sewer pipes

21,66021,660100.00N/A

507,090507,090

100.00

N/A

Hiroshima

Renovation of aging pipes

792,726

344,32143.44

25,311,507(annual total)

Prevention of underground pollution caused by sewerage leakage fromearthquakes and other natural disasters
Improvement of water circulation by preventing water leakage due to aging

1,151,634

738,298

64.11

Hiroshima

Updating pipes

40,773,619(annual total)

N/A

TottoriTottori City (2)Kure City

Fukuyama City
(1)
Fukuyama City
(2)
Iwakuni City

N/A

Yamaguchi

Imabari City (1)N/A

140,446

98,87570.40

Improving the functions of aging pipes

117,995

58,07849.22

8,287,867(annual total)

N/A

Renovation and renewal of old pipes

139,883

118,99085.06

15,718,816(annual total)

Prevention of underground pollution caused by sewerage leakage due tobroken pipes

Renovation of Miyanoura Rainwater main line

38,80020,530

52.91

N/A

N/A

20,463,776

11,395,582

Ehime
Imabari City (2)Total Amount of Pipes (Renewal) (37 projects)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity30

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Others 1
Others (New)
Total Project Cost
(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount/
Total Project Cost(%)

Positive environment impact

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems

182,629

181,000

99.11

N/A

Tochigi

Cost for project of watershed sewerage systems

15,89715,800

99.39

N/A

Gunma

Construction of new pipes in uncovered areas (Sewer pipes andrainwater pipes)

2,988,958

1,344,500

44.98

Along with the increase in the total length of pipes (15,921m),
the treatment area increased by about 92ha

243,926

125,220

51.34

Chiba

Development of rainwater storage facilities
180,000

110,000

61.11

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Morioka City

Iwate

Utsunomiya
City
Takasaki City

Project Description

Chiba City (1)Chiba City (2)Reducing flood damage

Funabashi City

Chiba

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems and for other
cities496,123432,800

87.24

N/A

Hiratsuka City

Kanagawa

Rebuild sewerage duct facilities and make them earthquake-resistant,and extend the durable life of pump stations by making themearthquake-resistant

1,021,558

510,700

49.99

N/A

Cost for the Sagami River basin

6,582

6,300

95.72

Construction of outdoor stairs in the water treatment building of theOshimizu Purification Center

27,56527,50099.76

114,600

57,20049.91

224,046

155,400

69.36

Newly constructed pipe length: 414 m
Diversion due to the construction of rainwater pipes reduced
leakage of untreated sewerage into rivers from heavy rain

Conservation of water quality in public waters

Fujisawa City
(1)
Fujisawa City
(2)
Matsumoto City
(1)
Matsumoto City
(2)

Kanagawa

NaganoN/AConstruction of rainwater pipes to prevent flood damage

Ise City

Mie

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems

149,034

148,700

99.78

Amagasaki City

Hyogo

Construction of manhole toilets and construction of rainwater seepage
pipe to prevent flooding

277,225

150,326

54.23

N/A

Fukuyama City

Hiroshima

Construction of new facilities for rainwater treatment projects

6,624

3,312

50.00

Newly constructed pipe length: 5,814 m
The amount of treated water to be increased by theconstruction of new sewer pipes are 83,302 m3 (annual total).

Aizumi Town

Tokushima

Redevelopment of human waste treatement facilities that are aging

894,880

443,800

49.59

N/A

Nagasaki City

Nagasaki

New City Hall Construction Project (to deal with the narrowness of thebuilding and the dispersion of windows, the lack of seismic capacity,and barrier-free measures)

189,842

180,300

94.97

N/A

7,019,489

3,892,858

Total Amount of Others (New) (16 projects)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity31

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Others 2
Others (Renewal)
Total Project Cost
(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount/
Total Project Cost(%)

Positive environment impact

Seismic measures of pipelines and reconstruction of facilities

2,068,840

684,359

33.08

N/A

Hokkaido

Cost for project of watershed sewerage systems

123,260

120,600

97.84

N/A

Hachinohe City

Aomori

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems (replacement of
power substation, renovation of pipeline facility, etc.)

19,10019,100100.00N/A

Oshu City

Iwate

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems (replacement oftreatment plant facilities, etc.)

52,14551,80099.34

N/A

Hitachinaka City

Ibaraki

Cost for construction of watershed sewerage systems (contributions forrenovation work of electric machinery and equipment in the Naka Kuji
Purification Center)

50,23245,50090.58

N/A

Takasaki City

Gunma

Improvement of sewerage treatment related facilities and cost ofwatershed sewerage systems

527,665

393,500

74.57

Prevention of serious accidents caused by aging seweragefacilities
Electricity usage (monthly average)
547,602kWh → 508,496kWh

Hiratsuka City

Kanagawa

Construction work for sewerage pipes, earthquake resistance,measures of making pump stations earthquake-resistant andexpanding their lifespan1,650,713

949,700

57.53

N/A

Fujisawa City

Kanagawa

Commission of design for renovation work of roadway shed at Fujigaya
Pumping Station

10,196

10,10099.06

N/A

Yamato City

Kanagawa

Maintenance of internal roads, renovation and renewal of monitoring
control equipment

8,463

3,986

47.10

N/A

Toyama City

ToyamaSeismic measures of administrative buildings, etc. at treatment plants

338,713

163,323

48.22

Borrowing
EntityPrefecture

Sapporo City

Hokkaido

Hakodate City

Project Description

3,228

3,200

99.13

Renovation and renewal of sewerage treatment, advanced treatment,
sludge treatment, pumping stations, sewer pipes, and earthquake
countermeasures at aging facilities

1,735,895

963,000

55.48

Sustaining the environmental benefits of public sewer pipes
Reduction of power consumption and greenhouse gas
emissions by replacing facilities with sophisticated ones.

Renewal of sewerage facilities as a countermeasure for earthquakes
and aging facilities

1,844,955

738,174

40.01

Cost for project of watershed sewerage systems (renovation of sewer
pipes, pumping stations and treatment plants)

224,620

194,000

86.37

496,550

496,500

99.99

7,588,525

1,787,500

23.56

3,825,088

1,367,000

35.74

70,69932,56946.07

Matsumoto City

NaganoCost for project of watershed sewerage systems

Kobe City

Hyogo

Amagasaki City
(1)
Amagasaki City
(2)

Hyogo

Nishinomiya
City (1)Nishinomiya
City (2)

Hyogo

Nishinomiya
City (3)Kure City

Hiroshima

N/A
Stable sewerage treatment even in the event of natural
disasters by updating aging facilities and improving
earthquake-resistanceRenewal and reconstruction of various aging facilities, including
facilities for sewerage treatment, advanced treatment, sludge treatment,
pump station, pipes, etc.

Operations to change business plan

N/A

※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity

32

N/A

N/A

(iii) Project by Project Reporting : Others 3
Others (Renewal)
Borrowing
EntityFukuyama City
(1)
Fukuyama City
(2)
Hatsukaichi City

Prefecture

Project Description

Hiroshima

Reconstruction and renewal of facilities related to rainwater treatment
projects

Hiroshima

Renovation and renewal of the in-house power generation facility at
the aging Hatsukaichi Purification Center

Yamaguchi

Cost of watershed sewerage systems

Iwakuni City (1)Iwakuni City (2)Total Project Cost
(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount(JPY 1,000)

JFM Loan Amount/
Total Project Cost(%)

815,956

136,750

16.76

1,465,482

765,184

52.21

24,40014,500

59.43

2,859

2,700

94.44

1,291

1,200

92.95

Positive environment impact

N/A

Improvement of public health and preservation of water quality
in public waters

N/A

Nagasaki City

Nagasaki

Renovation of aging central monitoring and control equipment

642,674

222,771

34.66

N/A

Kagoshima City

Kagoshima

Renovation and renewal of aging equipment and pipelines

1,830,044

1,168,700

63.86

N/A

25,421,593

10,335,716

Total Amount of Others (Renewal) (25 projects)※Numbered brackets after borrowing entity are cases where there are several JFM loans in one project, or several JFM loan projects in one borrowing entity33

(iv) Case Study 1 : Sewage Sludge Center Renovation Project
Seibu Sludge Treatment Center

Project Overview (Project Period: FY 2017 to FY2023)
Total Project Cost:

JPY 1,519.5 million“of which JFM funds”:

JPY

502.6 million(Apr.2021 to Mar.2022)

In Sapporo City, sewage sludge treatment is centralized in two centers (sludge
treatment plants) at the east and west part of the city, and they make effective
use of all incineration ash to be cement and other construction materials.
Seibu Sludge Treatment Center operates a total of 5 sewage sludge incinerators(Series1~4: 100t/day, Series5: 150t/day), of which 1~2 series incinerators havebeen in service for 39 years and are aging.

As a result of comparative study about how to effectively use sewage sludge, it
is decided to keep incineration as a comprehensive judgement from costs,
greenhouse gas emissions, and the stability of product demand.
The JFM funds are used to renovate the series 1 ~ 2 incinerator(s).

Highlights

Environmental effects of installing waste heat generation facilities
This Sludge Center reduces nitrous oxide by using the same type of hightemperature incinerator as before the renovation, and greenhouse gas
emissions by installing waste heat generation facilities to cover the electricity
used.

Electricity generated by waste heat from sewage sludge incineration (screw
power generation, binary power generation) is carbon-free electricity, andexpected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Power generation flow diagram
Screw Power
Generation

Vapor

Power generation: 3.07 million kWh/year
BinaryPower
Generation

Greenhouse gas reduction: 1,980 t-CO2/year

InsideSewage Sludge(after dehydrationand drying)

3.92 million
3,072kWh
kWh

Increase

6,943t6,943tCO2/Year

CO2/年

4,963t4,963tCO2/Year

CO2/年

Decrease0.85 million
kWh

Waste Heat Boiler

Power generationPowergeneration

Before Update

Incinerator
Incinerated
Ash34

After Update

GreenhousegasemissionsGreenhousegasemissions
Before Update
After Update(FY2024(FY2020(R FY
2 results)(R 6
estimate)
Estimate)
Actual)<Reference> Sapporo City, Hokkaido
DATA
Population

1,973,395 (as of October 1 2020)

Area

1,121.26 ㎢ (as of April 1 2022)

Sewerage Coverage

99.8% (as of March 31 2022)★

City Budget

JPY 1,161.6 billion (FY 2022 General Account Initial Budget)

Demographic Trend(1,000 People)

2,400
2,400
2,200
2,200
2,000
2,000

1,952
1,952

1,975
1,975

1,976
1,976

1,800
1,800

1,959
1,959

1,924
1,924

1,871
1,871

1,805
1,805

0

1,600
1,600
1,400
1,400
1,200
1,200
1,000
1,000

Overview

2015
2015

2020
2020

2025
2025

2030
2030

2035
2035

2040
2040

*Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Japan's Future
Population Estimates by Region (2018)

Sapporo City, Hokkaido, is located in the southwestern part of the Ishikari Plainin Hokkaido, and is characterized by refreshing summer and cold, snowy
winters.
Since the establishment of the Hokkaido Development Commission in 1869,
Sapporo City has continued to be evolved as a base for the development of
Hokkaido and now has a population of over 1.9 million (about 30% of the
population of Hokkaido), the fourth largest city, town and village after
Yokohama, Osaka and Nagoya.
Currently, trying to respond to rapidly increasing aging facilities, increasing
natural disasters, water quality conservation, and effective use of sewerageenergy and resources.

Sapporo Snow
Festival

Genghis Khan

35

(Year)

2045
2045

Sapporo Hitsujigaoka
Observatory

(iv) Case Study 2 : New Purification Center Construction Project
New purification center under construction

Project Overview (Project Period: FY 2017 to FY 2023 (planned))
Total Project Cost:

JPY 3,090 million“of which JFM funds”:

JPY 1,435 million(Apr.2021 to Mar.2022)

The existing purification center has been in service for more than 40 years since 1976, whichages over time and deteriores due to salt damage because it is located on the coast. On topof that, disaster response is another issue due to the lack of anti-earuthquake capacity.
The facilities are too old to meet the effluent water quality standards stipulated in the
Sewerage Act, and there are raising concerns on the impact on residents' lives and the water
environment.

A new eco-friendly purification center will be built which utilizes sewerage resources such as
recycled water and biomass power generation.
The JFM funds are used for sewage water treatment plants, sludge treatment plants,
administrative buildings and other facilities related to the construction of a new purification
center.

Highlights Environmental Effects of Digestive Gas Power Generation
1

Conceptional view of digestion gas power
generation equipment

Conceptional overview of purification center

Project Scheme
Digestion gas generated at the purification center is sold to theoperators. This project operator will cover all expenses of design,
construction, maintenance, management, and removal of the facilities
from the sale of electricity using the power generation facilities
developed within the center by applying the FIT system

2

Environmental Effects
Digestion gas generated during the sludge treatment process iseffectively used to generate stable power.

System Flow

Digestion gas is biomass energy and contributes to reducing CO2
emissions. This project contributes to creating a low-carbon society
by effectively utilizing sewerage resources.
Annual electricity generation 500 thousand kWh/year (Approximately
167 households' electricity consumption, assuming a monthly
electricity consumption of 250 kWh)Power Generation
Facility

Outflow

InflowDigestive Gas

Cake
Hopper

Gas Tank(Storage ofdigestive gas)
Sludge thickening tank
(Gravity
Concentration/Mechan
ical Concentration)

Unloadingby truck
SludgeDehydrator

Sewerage Treatment
Plant

CO2 reduction per year: approximately 205 t/year

36

Heat
Exchanger(Indirect
humidificationof digested
sludge)Digestion
Tank

Impurity Remover(HydrogenSulfide, Siloxane
removal)Gas Booster(Digestion gas
boost)

Hot water (high temperature)

Power
Generation

SludgeDigestion
Hot water (lowtemperature)

Biomass
Generator
Sludgecirculation
Pump

Hot water boiler(Heating of
circulating hot
water)

Power
Generator

<Reference> Marugame City, Kagawa
DATA
Population

109,513 (as of October 1 2020)

Area

111.83 ㎢ (as of April 1 2022)

Sewerage Coverage

43.8%( as of March 31 2021)

City Budget

JPY 53.9 billion (FY 2022 General Account Initial Budget)

Demographic Trend(1,000 People)

200
200
180
180

★

160
160
140
140
120
120

110
110

109
109

107
107

105
105

102
102

99
99

96
96

2015
2015

2020
2020

2025
2025

2030
2030

2035
2035

2040
2040

2045
2045 (Year)

100
100
80
80

Overview

60
60Marugame City, Kagawa Prefecture, is located in the center of the coastline of
Kagawa Prefecture, which stretches from east to west, with the scenic Seto Inland
Sea National Park in the north, mountains stretching across the Sanuki Mountains inthe south, the Sanuki Plain in the land area, urban areas along the northernwaterfront, rural landscapes in the middle and southern regions, and islands of the
Shiwaku marsh scattered throughout the Seto Inland Sea.

40
40
20
20
00

The public sewerage system, in the former Marugame City, was approved as anindependent public sewerage system in 1955. The sewerage system was put into
service in 1976 and has been improved since that time. The former Ayauta town
obtained approval for project of drainage basin specific environmental conservation
public sewerage system in 1995, and was introduced in 1998. The former Iiyama town
received approval for a project in 1993 as a drainage basin related public seweragesystem, and it started operating in 1996.
At present, various efforts are being made to solve the problems of seweragesystems. Such as ensuring sewerage functions that are necessary even in the eventof a major disasters, as well as measures against flooding, aging, improvement of
combined sewerage systems, and measures against global warming.

*Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Japan's Future
Population Estimates by Region (2018)

Marugame Castle

Marugame Uchiwa

37

Honetsukidori

(iv) Case Study 3 : Sewage Sludge Treatment Plant Renewal Project
Concentrated sewage sludge scraper

Project Overview (Project Period: FY 2019 to FY 2022 (tentative))
Total Project Cost:

JPY 490.4 million“of which JFM funds”:

JPY 183.3 million(Apr.2021 to Mar.2022)

The Imabari Sewage Treatment Center, the city's largest sewage treatment plant,
has been in service for more than 45 years and is undergoing a series of upgrades
to its aging facilities.
Starting in FY 2019, the company began upgrading its sewage sludge treatment
facilities to the latest equipment, including low-moisture content dehydrators, toreduce sludge treatment costs and the environmental impact of landfill disposal.

Renewal of the sewage sludge treatment facility at the Imabari Sewage Treatment
Center (Concentrated sewage sludge scrapers, concentrated sewage sludge
pumps, wet desulfurization equipment, gas storage tanks, dehydrators, etc.).
JFM Fund was allocated to the renewal of the facility.

Highlights
1

Lower Environmental Impact by Reducing Sewage Sludge

Renewal of dehydrators
This is a project to replace theaging sewage sludge treatment
facilities that replaces one of threesludge dehydrators installed in 1993.
The use of a dehydrator with amoisture content of 75% or less in
the renewal process is expected toreduce the amount of sewage
sludge generated, treatment costs,
and environmental impact byreducing landfill waste.

2

Volume and moisture content of sewage sludge discharged from
Imabari Sewage Treatment Center

FY 2022 Outlook

350t scheduled
to be reduced

81.0
81.0

In FY 2022, it is expected that
average water content is 80.7% andsewage sludge generation becomes
4,300 tons. In FY 2023, along withthis project, it is expected that
average water content will be 78.8%
and sewage sludge generation will
become about 3,950 tons, resulting inan annual reduction about 350 tons.
A part of the sewage sludge
generated is used as cement from thisfiscal year. Recycling seweragesludge is undergoing and recycling
rate of sewage sludge becomesaround 40%.

80.0
80.0

4,200
4,200

79.0
79.0

4,000
4,000

78.0
78.0

3,800
3,800

77.0
77.0

3,600
3,600

76.0
76.0

3,400
3,400

75.0
75.0

38

4,400
4,400

FY2018FY2019FY2020

FY2021

Amountdischarged(t)(t)Amountofof sludge
sludge discharged

FY2022

FY2023

3,200
3,200

Moisturecontent(%)(%)
Moisture content

<Reference> Imabari City, Ehime
DATA
Population

151,672 (as of October 1 2020)

Area

419.21 ㎢ (as of April 1 2022)

Sewerage Coverage

64.5% (as of March 31 2021)

City Budget

JPY 74.72 billion (FY 2022 General Account Initial Budget)

Demographic Trend(1,000 People)

400
400
360
360
320
320

★

280
280
240
240
200
200

158
158

160
160

149
149

140
140

130
130

120
120

110
110

101
101

2035
2035

2040
2040

2045
2045 (Year)

120
120
80
80

Overview
Imabari City is located in the northeastern part of Ehime Prefecture, almost in thecenter of the Seto Inland Sea, and is endowed with wonderful scenery including
the beautiful scattered islands which is referred to as the Aegean Sea of theEast, and the Shimanami Kaido, as well as a variety of regional resources suchas various historical and cultural heritages and traditional performing arts
represented by the Japanese heritage "Murakami Pirates," art galleries,
museums and hot spring resorts, as well as ingredients from the mountains and
sea.

40
40
00

2015
2015

2020
2020

2025
2025

2030
2030

*Source: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Japan's Future Population Estimates by Region(Estimates for 30 (2018))

A view of the Kurushima Strait Bridge on
the islands of the Seto Inland Sea from the
Mt. Kiro Observatory

It is one of the most concentrated areas of towels and maritime industries inJapan, and boasts the highest value of manufactured goods shipped, including
oil-related businesses and the food industry, in Shikoku.
The Setouchi Shimanami Kaido has been nationally designated as a “National
Cycle Route” and is attracting attention from cycling enthusiasts around theworld as a “sacred place for cyclists”. Cycling Shimanami 2022, an international
cycling event, took place along the main motorway in October 2022.

39

Holding Cycling Shimanami