Par$cle(produc$on(mechanisms(in(hadron(collisions(Satoshi(Yano(Hiroshima(UniversityIntroduc$onPhysics(mo$va$ons(at(LHCB?=>

:-'1'94F!

Physics(mo$va$ons(at(LHC
B?=>

:-'1'94F!

6(%(+7:$82)8%6F

Physics(mo$va$ons(at(LHC
B?=>

:-'1'94F!

6(%(+7:$82)8%6FB&2)8*FPhysics(mo$va$ons(at(LHCB?=>

:-'1'94F!

6(%(+7:$82)8%6F

B&2)8*F

3QGP3&8F

QCD(in(pp(at(LHCA?<=CD@!

A?<=CD@

G5/;0HA?<=CD@+,3#QCD(in(pp(at(LHCA?<=CD@!

A?<=CD@

G5/;0HA?<=CD@+,3#.6EEEUnexpected(results(in(ppPar$cle(produc$on
• Factoriza$on(Theorem

(hc222ˆ
dσ AB→hc X = fa ( xa , µ PDF⊗
fx,µ⊗dσ⊗Dz,µ) b ( b PDF ) ab→cx c ( c FF )Nucleon&pA

2fa ( xa , µ PDF)

z = pcphCPar)cle&C

xa pAOther&par)cle

σ ab→cx

Nucleon&pB

2
Dchc ( zc , µ FF)

x b pBX
2fb ( xb , µ PDF)

Par$cle(produc$on
• Factoriza$on(Theorem

(hc222ˆdσ AB→hc X = fa ( xa , µ PDF⊗
fx,µ⊗dσ⊗Dz,µ) b ( b PDF ) ab→cx c ( c FF )Nucleon&pA

2fa ( xa , µ PDF)

z = pcphCPar)cle&C

xa pA
Other&par)cle

σ ab→cx

Nucleon&pB

2
Dchc ( zc , µ FF)

x b pBX
2fb ( xb , µ PDF)

Par$cle(produc$on
• Factoriza$on(Theorem(hc222ˆdσ AB→hc X = fa ( xa , µ PDF⊗fx,µ⊗dσ⊗Dz,µ) b ( b PDF ) ab→cx c ( c FF )Nucleon&pA

2fa ( xa , µ PDF)

z = pcphCHadron&C

xa pAOther&par)cle

σ ab→cx

Nucleon&pB

2Dchc ( zc , µ FF)

x b pBX
2fb ( xb , µ PDF)QCD(subprocess• Hard(scaEering(in(conven$onal(pQCD(# pT &d 3σd 3σ
1E 3 (AB → CX) == 2nactive −4 F % ($ s'dp
pT dpT dydϕ pT– nac$ve(is(the(number(of(ﬁelds(par$cipa$ng(to(the(hard(process((– pT/√s("(xT((①③ 2→2(subQprocess(Jet(or(direct(photon((nac$ve(=(4(→(2nac$ve(–(4(=(4②④xT(scaling(nn!
$n! pT $ ! 2 $dσss E 3 (AB → CX) = # & F # & = # & F ! ( xT ) = G ( xT )dp
" pT % " s % " xT %3n = 2nactive − 42 pTxT =s

xT(scaling(nn!
$n! pT $ ! 2 $dσss E 3 (AB → CX) = # & F # & = # & F ! ( xT ) = G ( xT )dp
" pT % " s % " xT %3n = 2nactive − 42 pTxT =s
NOT&depend&on&collision&energy!

Direct(hadron(produc$on
Meson&produc)on①

Direct(meson(produc$on((nac$ve(=(5(→(2nac$ve(–(4(=(6③④⑤②Baryon&produc)on
③①d 3σ
1 " pT %E 3 (AB → CX) = 6F $ 'dp
pT # s &Direct(baryon(produc$on((nac$ve(=(6(→(2nac$ve(–(4(=(8d 3σ
1 " pT %

④⑤E②⑥

dp

3(AB → CX) =F$ 'pT # s &8Extrac$on(of(the(exponent(n(• From(xT(scaling(d 3σs E 3 (AB → CX) = G ( xT )dpn

• G(xT)(is(constant((Constant(for(several(collision(energies

n
d 3σ
d 3σ
s1 E 3 (AB → CX) = s2 E 3 (AB → CX)
dp
dpn

ln "#σ 1inv xT , s1 / σ 2inv xT , s2 $%n=−ln s1 / s2()(())

NOTE:(√s1√s2(is(beEer(to(cancel(several(higher(order(eﬀectsExponent(n(in(experiment• Exponent(n(is(measured(at(22.4(GeV(to(1.8(TeVHadronDirect&γ&JetNeutral(meson(measurement(with(the(ALICE(detectorALICE(@(LHCCentral(detectors(•– ITS:(Par$cle(DCA(– TPC:(Tracking(+(PID(– TOF:(PID(– HMPID:(PID(– TRD:(electron(ID(– EM(Calorimeter:(5(MeV(–(80(GeV(Forward(detectors(•20K

πpd

ALICE performancetpp, s = 13 TeV
B = 0.2 T

1.11eπ

0.9K

10865

HMPID Cherenkov angle (rad)Energy deposit per unit length (keV/cm)

30

TOF β– Muon:(Tracking(muon(IDp0.8

μd0.7

430.6eALICE Performance

20.5

10−1

ALI-PERF-102369

1100.4

Pb-Pb s NN = 5.02 TeV
0.5Momentum (GeV/c)

11.5

22.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0.7

π

0.6
0.5

K
p0.4
0.3

30/09/2011
pp s = 7 TeV

0.2
0.1

5p (GeV/ c )ALI-PERF-106336

0.8

000.5

ALI−PERF−11754

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5p (GeV/c)

Photon(reconstruc$on((1)(• PHOS(– Lead(Tungstate(Crystal((PbWO4)((– Cell(dimensions:((• ((Δη × Δϕ = 0.004 × 0.004– Energy(resolu$on:(• ((σ E / E = 1.8% / E ⊕ 3.3% / E ⊕1.1%– ((( | η |< 0.12, Δϕ = 60!

• EMCal(– Shashlik(calorimeter((leads/scin$llator(×(77)((– Cell(dimensions:((• ((Δη × Δϕ = 0.0143× 0.0143– Energy(resolu$on:(• ((– ((( σ E / E = 4.8% / E ⊕11.3% / E ⊕1.7%| η |< 0.67, Δϕ = 100!

Photon(reconstruc$on((2)(Photon(Conversion(Method((PCM)(•– Select(electron(candidates(with(TPC(dE/dx(– Pair(of(electron(and(positron(with(large(impact(parameter((– DCA(between(the(pair((V0(ﬁnding)(– ArmenterosQPodolanskiQPlot(((Performance(""(Energy deposit per unit length (keV/cm)

3020((| η |< 0.9, 0 < ϕ < 2πPurity(>(99%(Kπ0.25pdALICE performancetpp, s = 13 TeV
B = 0.2 T

qT (GeV/c)"ALICE Performancep-Pb @ sNN = 5.02 TeVLint = 30 nb-1
0.2 7th May 2014
010-4Ks100.1586510-5

μ0.143ΛΛe10-60.052

γ
10−1

ALI-PERF-102369

1

Momentum (GeV/c)

100-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0
ALI−PERF−69400

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
α = (p+-p- )/(p++p- )LLLL

Data(sample
protonQproton(@(8(TeV((2012)(
MinQbunch(crossing:(50(ns(=(20M(Hz(The(collision(probability(/(BC(@(ALICE:(1(–(5(%(((MinimumQbias(trigger((–––•

Coincidence(V0QA(and(V0QC(76%(eﬃciency(for(the(inelas$c(cross(sec$on(σppMB(=(55.7(mb((vdM(scan(technique)(PHOSQtrigger(–L0Qtrigger:(Eth(=(4(GeV((••

Rejec$on(factor(to(MB:(~10000((EMCalQtrigger((–L0Qtrigger:(Eth(=(2(GeV(–L1Qtrigger:(Eth(=(4(GeV(••

Rejec$on(factor(to(MB:(~70(Rejec$on(factor(to(MB:(~(12000(Gamma trigger efficiency

••
•
•

1.2
ALICE performance
17.09.2015

10.8

0.6

dataMC0.4

pp , s = 8 TeVPHOS trigger

0.2Trigger threshold 4 GeV
00
ALI−PERF−96683

510152025303540

Reconstructed E (GeV)Neutral(meson(reconstruc$on• Invariant(mass(of(two(photon(candidate:((((((((M γ 1γ 2 = 2Eγ 1Eγ 2 (1− cosθγ 1γ 2 )•••Event(mixing(for(uncorrelated(background(Fit(with(gauss(+(low(mass(tail((Paring(two(photons(from(PHOS(/(PCM(/(EMCal(/(PCMQEMCal(hybrid(Results

1012
1011

p-p s=8 TeV
π0→γ γ

1010PCM109

Ed σ 3dp

3 pp→π0X(pb GeV-2c 3)

Full(corrected(cross(sec$on
PHOS

MB

EMCal

810

PCM-EMCal
710

TCM fit106105
104
103
102

Data / TCM fit

d 3σ1 σ pp AND (1− FSecondary ) 1
ΔN hE 3 =idp
2π pT N evt
Br(h → γγ ) Acc ⋅ ε ΔηΔϕ

10
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.210.80.60.40.21ΔN h:(The(number(of(reconstructed(π0ΔηΔϕMBAND
σ pp:(The(cross(sec$on(of(the(MB(trigger

iN evt:(The(number(of(analyzed(event(FSecondary :(Frac$on(of(the(secondary((π0(10p (GeV/c)
T

Br(h → γγ ) :(Branching(ra$o(π0→γγ(Acc ⋅ ε1

10p (GeV/c)
T:(acceptance(x(eﬃciency(1011p-p s=8 TeV
π0→γ γ1010
109

Ed σ 3dp3 pp→π0X(pb GeV-2c 3)

Results:(Cross(sec$on(at(8(TeV108

Theory, Data
TCM fit107• 0.3(–(35(GeV/c(π0(has(been(measured(by(combining(all(subsystems!(• The(pQCD(predic$ons(which(have(been(tuned(with(lower(energy(results(overes$mate(the(spectrum.

106105

103

3T

Data
TCM fit
Tsalis fit
Power law fit

104

pp, s = 8 TeV
ALICE
π0 → γ γ

norm. unc. 2.6%
Data
NLO, PDF:CTEQ6M5 - FF:DSS07µ = 0.5 p
Tµ=pTµ=2p2102

1
NLO, PDF:MSTW08 - FF:DSS14, 0.5p < µ < 2pT

0.3110ALI−PUB−135914

p (GeV/c)
T1234 5 6 7 8 10T2030 40

p (GeV/c )T

Exponent(n(nexpeff =-ln[σinv(x T, s1)/σinv(x T, s2)]ln( s1 s2)

87pp → π0+X, |η|<0.5, p > 3.5 GeV/cT
s1=8 TeV, s2=2.76 TeV
s1=510 GeV, s2=200 GeV

The(π0(is(consistent(with(the(jet(@LHC(energies(• The(π0(is(higher(than(the(jet(@(RHIC(energies•654321 −310pp(p) → Jet+X, |η|<0.5, R=0.5s1=8 TeV, s2=2.76 TeV
s1=500 GeV, s2=200 GeV
10−210−11x T=2p / sT• Almost(all(neutral(pions(are(generated(by(the(jet(fragmenta$on(@(LHC!(• On(the(other(hand,(neutral(pions(are(generated(by(both(jet(fragmenta$on(and(direct(hadron(produc$on(@(RHIC!(

12/(dN /0/dd)/dN 0/dd

Mul$plicity(dependence10•

V0 Multiplicity Classp-p s=8 TeV
PHOS,/0Aa a

1 < p < 1.5 GeV/c8T

5.5 < p < 16 GeV/cT

64200.51

1.52

2.533.54

4.55(dN ch/dd)/dN /ddchThe(growth(of(high(pT(region(is(larger(than(low(pT.(12/(dN /0/dd)/dN 0/dd

Mul$plicity(dependence

10The(growth(of(high(pT(region(is(larger(than(low(pT.(•V0 Multiplicity Classp-p s=8 TeV
PHOS,/0Aa a

1 < p < 1.5 GeV/c

8T

5.5 < p < 16 GeV/c

•

T

6


4

20

Pythia8 with CR
Pythia8 w/o CR
0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.55(dN ch/dd)/dN /ddch

The(CR((Color(Reconnec$on)(
model(describes(both(high(and(low(pT(growth.(

Color(reconnec$on((CR)
①

①Mul$ple(Parton(Interac$ons((Color(reconnec$on((CR)
①

②

①Mul$ple(Parton(Interac$ons((②Color(connec$on(((Color(reconnec$on((CR)
①

②

①Mul$ple(Parton(Interac$ons((②Color(connec$on(((③Color(reconnec$on((CR)(③

Mul$plicity(dependence(dN /dd)/dN /dd

16V0 Multiplicity Class

14T

12
10

The(growth(of(high(pT(region(is(larger(than(low(pT.(•PHOS, /0, 5.5<p <16 GeV/c
T 0 + *+ALICE, Average D ,D ,D , 8.0<p <12 GeV/c

Pythia8 Color Reconnection scheme
New more QCD based scheme
MPI-based original Pythia 8 scheme
New gluon-move model•

86

The(CR((Color(Reconnec$on)(
model(describes(both(high(and(low(pT(growth.(4•2


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

(dN ch/dd)/dN /ddch

The(CR(model(describes(both((light(and(heavy(hadrons(growth.(

Mul$plicity(dependence(dN /dd)/dN /dd1614pp(√s=8(TeV(Pythia8(+(CRV0 Multiplicity ClassNo(ridgeT1210The(growth(of(high(pT(region(is(larger(than(low(pT.(•PHOS, /0, 5.5<p <16 GeV/c
T 0 + *+ALICE, Average D ,D ,D , 8.0<p <12 GeV/c

Pythia8 Color Reconnection scheme
New more QCD based scheme
MPI-based original Pythia 8 scheme
New gluon-move model

•

86



The(CR((Color(Reconnec$on)(
model(describes(both(high(and(low(pT(growth.(4•2


0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

(dN ch/dd)/dN /ddch

The(CR(model(describes(both((light(and(heavy(hadrons(growth.(0Results:(η(to(π (ra$oratio• mT(scaling(viola$on!((6.2σ)(• Radial(ﬂow?(ALICE pp, s = 8 TeV - (η/ π0)1.4/(η/ π0)mdata

T

1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.4
ALI−PUB−135950

1234 5 6 7 8 910

2030

p (GeV/c )T

Summary(and(conclusion
• Wide(pT(range(neutral(pion(cross(sec$on(in(pp(collisions(at(several(LHC(energies(have(been(measured(with(the(ALICE(detector.(• The(direct(hadron(produc$on(mechanism(can(be(ignored(at(LHC(collisions(energies.(On(the(other(hand(at(RHIC(energies,(it(should(be(considered.(– When(we(compare(with(the(LHC(and(RHIC(results,(the(diﬀerences(should(be(considered.((• The(CR(model(describes(the(mul$plicity(dependence(of(light(and(heavy(hadrons.(– The(CR(can(not(reproduce(the(ridge…(• The(obvious(mT(scaling(viola$on(has(been(measured.((1210102110(a) pp→π , |η|<0.5

1010

9108

Data/Fit

103E d σ3
dp

1.5

105

Data/Fit

10121076(b) Levy-Tsallis

0.5

1.5

110p [GeV/c](c) TCMT10.51041021011023Data/Fit

10−110−210−310−4

Levy-Tsallis
TCMPower-Law

1.5110p T [GeV/c](d) Power-Law

10.520pp, s = 8 TeV × 10pp, s = 7 TeV × 10-2pp, s = 2.76 TeV × 10-4

1.5

pQCD/Data

pp→π0X[pb GeV-2c 3]

LHCQRun1(pp(results

1110

p [GeV/c](e) pQCDMSTW2008(PDF)
DSS14(FF)

T

0.5

1110

p [GeV/c]
T10

p [GeV/c]T4.93( s/GeV) E d σ3dppp→π0+X[pb GeV-2c 3]xT(scaling
103210311030
10291028102710261025102410231022
211010201019

pp → π0+X, |η|<0.5s = 8 TeV
s = 7 TeV
s = 2.76 TeV

1018
10−4−31010−210−1x T=2p T/ s

107

p-p s=8 TeV
MBAND

610V0M Event ClassClass IdN/d%

Entries

Mul$plicity(determina$on
106Class IIClass III

SPD Tracklets |dlab|<1.0
V0M Class: 0-0.1 %V0M Class: 0.1-1.0 %V0M Class: 1.0-5.0 %V0M Class: 5.0-10 %V0M Class: 10-20 %V0M Class: 20-30 %V0M Class: 30-50 %V0M Class: 50-70 %V0M Class: 70-100 %p-p s=8 TeV
MBAND

105

Class IVClass VClass VI

105

Class VII

104

Class VIIIClass IX

104

103

103

102

050100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
V0A + V0C signal

0102030405060708090100

corrected,|d|<1.0
Ntracklets