Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

CHAPTER 2

WASTE GENERATION, COMPOSITION
AND MANAGEMENT DATA

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.1

Volume 5: Waste

Authors
Riitta Pipatti (Finland), Chhemendra Sharma (India), Masato Yamada (Japan)
Joao Wagner Silva Alves (Brazil), Qingxian Gao (China), G.H. Sabin Guendehou (Benin), Matthias Koch
(Germany), Carlos López Cabrera (Cuba), Katarina Mareckova (Slovakia), Hans Oonk (Netherlands),
Elizabeth Scheehle (USA), Alison Smith (UK), Per Svardal (Norway), and Sonia Maria Manso Vieira (Brazil)

2.2

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

Contents
2

Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data
2.1

Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 2.4

2.2

Waste generation and management data ............................................................................................. 2.4

2.2.1

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) ................................................................................................... 2.5

2.2.2

Sludge .......................................................................................................................................... 2.7

2.2.3

Industrial waste ........................................................................................................................... 2.8

2.2.4

Other waste ................................................................................................................................ 2.10

2.3

Waste composition ............................................................................................................................ 2.11

2.3.1

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) ................................................................................................. 2.11

2.3.2

Sludge ........................................................................................................................................ 2.15

2.3.3

Industrial waste ......................................................................................................................... 2.15

2.3.4

Other waste ................................................................................................................................ 2.16

Annex 2A.1

Waste Generation and Management Data - by country and regional averages ......................... 2.17

References ......................................................................................................................................................... 2.21

TablesTable 2.1

MSW generation and treatment data - regional defaults ...................................................... 2.5

Table 2.2

Industrial waste generation in selected countries ................................................................. 2.9

Table 2.3

MSW composition data by percent - regional defaults ...................................................... 2.12

Table 2.4

Default dry matter content, DOC content, total carbon content
and fossil carbon fraction of different MSW components ................................................. 2.14

Table 2.5

Default DOC and fossil carbon content in industrial waste ............................................... 2.16

Table 2.6

Default DOC and fossil carbon contents in other waste .................................................... 2.16

Table 2A.1

MSW generation and management data - by country and regional averages .................... 2.17

Boxes
Box 2.1

Example of activity data collection for estimation of emissions from solid waste treatment
based on waste stream analysis by waste type ..................................................................... 2.6

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.3

Volume 5: Waste

2 WASTE GENERATION, COMPOSITION AND
MANAGEMENT DATA
2.1

INTRODUCTION

The starting point for the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from solid waste disposal, biological treatment
and incineration and open burning of solid waste is the compilation of activity data on waste generation,
composition and management. General guidance on the data collection for solid waste disposal, biologicaltreatment and incineration and open burning of waste is given in this chapter in order to ensure consistency
across these waste categories. More detailed guidance on choice of activity data, emission factors and otherparameters needed to make the emission estimates is given under Chapter 3, Solid Waste Disposal, Chapter 4,
Biological Treatment of Solid Waste, and in Chapter 5, Incineration and Open Burning of Waste.
Solid waste generation is the common basis for activity data to estimate emissions from solid waste disposal,
biological treatment, and incineration and open burning of waste. Solid waste generation rates and composition
vary from country to country depending on the economic situation, industrial structure, waste management
regulations and life style. The availability and quality of data on solid waste generation as well as subsequent
treatment also vary significantly from country to country. Statistics on waste generation and treatment have been
improved substantially in many countries during the last decade, but at present only a small number of countries
have comprehensive waste data covering all waste types and treatment techniques. Historical data on waste
disposal at SWDS are necessary to estimate methane (CH4) emissions from this category using the First Order
Decay method (see Chapter 3 Solid Waste Disposal, Section 3.2.2). Very few countries have data on historicalwaste disposal going back several decades.
Solid waste is generated from households, offices, shops, markets, restaurants, public institutions, industrial
installations, water works and sewage facilities, construction and demolition sites, and agricultural activities(emissions from manure management as well as on-site burning of agricultural residues are treated in the
Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) Volume). It is good practice to account for all types of solid
waste when estimating waste-related emissions in the greenhouse gas inventory.
Solid waste management practices include: collection, recycling, solid waste disposal on land, biological andother treatments as well as incineration and open burning of waste. Although recycling (material recovery)1
activities will affect the amounts of waste entering into other management and treatment systems, the impact onemissions due to recycling (e.g., changes in emissions in production processes and transportation) is covered
under other sectors and will not be addressed here in more detail.

2.2

WASTE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENTDATA

Guidance on how to collect data on waste generation and management practices is given separately formunicipal solid waste (MSW), sludge, industrial and other waste. Default definitions for these categories are
given below. These default definitions are used in the subsequent methodological guidance. The definitions aretransparent to allow for country-specific modifications, as waste categorisation varies much from country tocountry, and can encompass different waste components.2 If the available data used in the inventory cover only
certain waste types or sources (e.g., municipal waste), this limited availability should be documented clearly in
the inventory report and efforts should be made to complement the data to cover all waste types.
In the Section 2.3 Waste Composition, default compositions are given for these default waste categories. The
default compositions are used as the basis for the calculations for Tier 1 methods.

1

Recycling is often defined to encompass also waste-to-energy activities and biological treatment. For practical reasons amore narrow definition is used here: Recycling is defined as recovery of material resources (typically paper, glass, metals
and plastics, sometimes wood and food waste) from the waste stream.

2

Some countries do not use these broad waste categories but a more detailed classification, e.g., the Regulation of theEuropean Parliament and Council on waste statistics (EC no 2150/2002) that does not include municipal solid waste as acategory.

2.4

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

2.2.1

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

Municipal waste is generally defined as waste collected by municipalities or other local authorities. However,this definition varies by country. Typically, MSW includes:•

Household waste;•

Garden (yard) and park waste; and•Commercial/institutional waste.

The regional default composition data for MSW is given in Section 2.3.1.

Default data
Region-specific default data on per capita MSW generation and management practices are provided in Table 2.1.
These data are estimated based on country-specific data from a limited number of countries in the regions (seeAnnex 2A.1). These data are based on weight of wet waste3 and can be assumed to be applicable for the year
2000. Waste generation per capita for subsequent or earlier years can be estimated using the guidance on how toestimate historical emissions from SWDS in Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2, and the methods for extrapolation andinterpolation using drivers in Chapter 6, Time Series Consistency, in Volume 1, General Guidance andReporting.
TABLE 2.1
MSW GENERATION AND TREATMENT DATA - REGIONAL DEFAULTS
RegionMSW Generation
Rate1, 2, 3
(tonnes/cap/yr)

Fraction of
MSW disposed
to SWDS

Fraction of
MSW
incinerated

Fraction of
MSW
composted

Fraction of other
MSW management,
unspecified4

0.37
0.21
0.27

0.55
0.74
0.59

0.26
0.09

0.01
0.05
0.05

0.18
0.21
0.27

0.29

0.69

-

-

0.31

0.38
0.64
0.52
0.56

0.90
0.47
0.85
0.47

0.04
0.24
0.05
0.22

0.01
0.08
0.05
0.15

0.02
0.20
0.05
0.15

0.49
0.21
0.26
0.65

0.83
0.50
0.54
0.58

0.02
0.01
0.06

0.003
0.06

0.15
0.50
0.46
0.29

0.69

0.85

-

-

0.15

Asia
Eastern Asia
South-Central Asia
South-East Asia
Africa5
EuropeEastern Europe
Northern Europe
Southern Europe
Western Europe
America
Caribbean
Central America
South America
North America
Oceania6

3

1

Data are based on weight of wet waste.

2

To obtain the total waste generation in the country, the per-capita values should be multiplied with the population whose waste iscollected. In many countries, especially developing countries, this encompasses only urban population.

3

The data are default data for the year 2000, although for some countries the year for which the data are applicable was not given in thereference, or data for the year 2000 were not available. The year for which the data are collected, where available, is given in the Annex
2A.1.

4

Other, unspecified, includes data on recycling for some countries.

5

A regional average is given for the whole of Africa as data are not available for more detailed regions within Africa.

6

Data for Oceania are based only on data from Australia and New Zealand.

Wet waste is not treated before measuring, while dry weight is estimated after drying waste under certain temperature,
ventilation and time conditions before measuring. In the conversions in this Volume (see e.g., Table 2.4) the assumption isthat no moisture is left in the dry matter.

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.5

Volume 5: Waste

Country-specific data
It is good practice that countries use data on country-specific MSW generation, composition and management
practices as the basis for their emission estimation.
Country-specific data on MSW generation and management practices can be obtained from waste statistics,
surveys (municipal or other relevant administration, waste management companies, waste association
organisations, other) and research projects (World Bank, OECD, ADB, JICA, U.S.EPA, IIASA, EEA, etc.).
Large countries with differences in waste generation and treatment within the domestic regions are encouraged touse data from these regions to the extent possible. Additional guidance on data collection in general and on waste
surveys is given in Chapter 2, Approaches to Data Collection, in Volume 1.

Data from waste stream analyses
MSW treatment techniques are often applied in a chain or in parallel. A more accurate but data intensive
approach to data collection is to follow the streams of waste from one treatment to another taking into accountthe changes in composition and other parameters that affect emissions. Waste stream analyses should be
combined with high quality country-specific data on waste generation and management. The approach is often
complemented with modelling. When using this approach, it is good practice to verify the data using separately
collected data on MSW generation, treatment and disposal, especially in cases where they are based largely onmodelling. This method is only more accurate than the approaches given above if countries have good quality,
detailed data on each end point and have verified the information.
An example of applying the approach for estimating the amount of paper waste disposed at SWDS is given in
Box 2.1, Example of Activity Data Collection for Estimation of Emissions from Solid Waste Treatment Basedon Waste Stream Analysis by Waste Type. Using this approach following all waste streams in the country would
provide activity data for all solid waste treatment and disposal (including waste incineration and open burning ofwaste). The data needed for the approach could be estimated based on surveys to industry, households and waste
management companies/facilities, complemented with statistical data on MSW generation, treatment anddisposal.

BOX 2.1
EXAMPLE OF ACTIVITY DATA COLLECTION FOR ESTIMATION OF EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE TREATMENT
BASED ON WASTE STREAM ANALYSIS BY WASTE TYPE

Waste streams begin at the point of generation, flow through collection and transportation,
separation for resource recovery, treatment for volume reduction, detoxification, stabilisation,
recycling and/or energy recovery and terminate at SWDS. Waste streams are country-specific.
Traditionally most solid waste has been disposed at SWDS in many countries. Recent growing
recognition of the need for resource conservation and environmental protection has increased solid
waste recycling and treatment before disposal in developed countries. In developing countries,
recovery of valuable material at collection, during transportation and at SWDSs has been common.
Degradable organic carbon (DOC) is one of the main parameters affecting the CH4 emissions fromsolid waste disposal. DOC is estimated based on the waste composition, and varies for different
waste fractions. Accurate estimates of the amount of waste and amount of DOC in waste (DOCm)
disposed at SWDS could be achieved by sampling waste at the gate of SWDS and measuring
DOCm in that waste, or specifying the waste stream for each waste type and/or source.
Intermediate processes in the waste stream can significantly change physical and chemical
properties of waste, including moisture and DOCm. DOCm in waste at SWDS will differ
considerably from that at generation, depending on the treatment before the disposal. For thosecountries that do not have reliable data based on measurements on DOCm disposed at SWDS, theanalysis on the change in mass of moisture and DOCm during earlier treatment for each waste
type, could provide a method to avoid over-/under-estimating the CH4 emissions at SWDS.

2.6

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

BOX 2.1 (CONTINUED)
EXAMPLE OF ACTIVITY DATA COLLECTION FOR ESTIMATION OF EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE TREATMENT
BASED ON WASTE STREAM ANALYSIS BY WASTE TYPE

Paper Waste
Generation
Total 1000
(Mois. 200)
DOCm 400

Resource
Recovery
Total 500
(Mois. 100)
DOCm 200

Stream A (composting)Total 100 -> 80(Mois. 20 ->20)
Compost
DOCm 40 ->20
50% reduction of DOCm
Stream B (incineration)
Total 200 -> 40(Mois. 40 ->4)
Ash
DOCm 80 ->080% reduction of Total Mass
90% reduction of Mois.
100% reduction of DOC m

Use on Land
Total 40
(Mois. 10)
DOCm 10

SWDS
total 270
(Mois. 44)
DOCm 90

Stream C (disposal)
Total 200 -> 190(Mois. 40 ->30)
DOCm 80 ->80
25% loss of Mois. duringreshipment & transportation

Note 1: ‘Mois.’ means moisture and DOCm is the mass of degradable organic carbon.
Note 2: Values in each box give the weight of the total mass (Total), moisture (Mois.) and DOCm in mass units (tonnes orkilograms or other).

The figure above shows an example of a paper waste flow chart for analysis of change in DOCm
in waste during the treatment before disposal. Some portion of paper waste would be recovered asmaterial, and be diverted from the waste management flow. The DOCm in paper waste is reduced
by intermediate processes, such as composting and incineration before disposal at the SWDS.
Mass of total waste, DOCm and moisture at the exit of each process can be given by multiplying
mass of these components at the entrance by reduction rates of the process. In this figure thechanges of mass are studied for paper waste solely, although the treatment steps would usually
include also other waste types. Incineration will remove most of the moisture, but the ash will be
re-wetted to avoid the fly loss during transportation and loading into SWDS. Greenhouse gas
emissions from other categories than SWDS (i.e., resource recovery, composting, incineration anduse on land) should be estimated under guidelines in relevant chapters. The estimates in this figure
are based on expert judgement only as an example.
To apply this approach national statistics on municipal waste generation and treatment streams,
country-specific parameters on waste composition and fraction moisture as well as DOC estimatesfor each waste type are needed for precise estimation. It may be difficult to obtain all these dataand parameters in many countries. If country-specific reduction rates of moisture and DOCm ateach intermediate treatment step before disposal at SWDS can be obtained, estimated DOCm
disposed into SWDS will be more precise than when based on data measured at generation.

2.2.2

SludgeSludge from domestic and industrial wastewater treatment plants is addressed as a separate waste category in thisVolume. In some countries, sludge from domestic wastewater treatment is included in MSW and sludge fromindustrial wastewater treatment in industrial waste. Countries may also include all sludge in industrial waste.
When country-specific categorisation is used, it should be documented transparently.
The emissions from sludge treatment at wastewater treatment facilities are treated in Chapter 6, Wastewater
Treatment and Discharge. Chapters 3, 4 and 5 consider disposal, composting (and anaerobic digestion of sludge

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.7

Volume 5: Waste

with other organic solid waste) and incineration of sludge, respectively. Sludge that is applied on agriculturalland is considered in Volume 4, Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 11, Section 11.2, N2O
Emissions from Managed Soils. Double counting of the emissions between the different categories should be
avoided. The amount of organic matter removed from wastewater treatment as sludge (see Equation 6.1 in
Chapter 6) due to disposal into SWDS, composting, incineration or use in agriculture should be consistent withthe amounts reported under these categories.
Default data for sludge generation, disposal into SWDS, composting or incineration are not given here.4 If no
country-specific data are available, the reporting of the emissions is covered by the methodology in Chapter 6.
Default values for degradable organic carbon content in sludge are given in Section 2.3 Waste Composition, in
this chapter.

2.2.3

Industrial waste

In some countries, significant quantities of organic industrial solid waste are generated. 5 Industrial waste
generation and composition vary depending on the type of industry and processes/technologies in the concernedcountry. Countries apply various categorisations for industrial waste. For example, construction and demolition
waste can be included in industrial waste, in MSW, or defined as a separate category. The default categorisation
used here assumes construction and demolition waste are part of the industrial waste. In many countries
industrial solid waste is managed as a specific stream and the waste amounts are not covered by general waste
statistics. OECD (see e.g., OECD, 2002) collects statistical data on industrial waste generation and treatment.
These statistics are published periodically. In most developing countries industrial wastes are included in themunicipal solid waste stream, therefore, it is difficult to obtain data of the industrial waste separately.
Industrial solid waste disposal data may be obtained by surveys or from national statistics. Only those industrial
wastes which are expected to contain DOC and fossil carbon should be considered for the purpose of emission
estimation from waste. Construction and demolition waste is mainly inert (concrete, rubble, etc.) but may containsome DOC (see Section 2.3.3) in wood and some fossil carbon in plastics. Recycling and reduction using
different technologies applied to industrial waste prior to disposal in SWDS or incineration should be taken into
account, where data are available.

Default data
Industrial waste generation data (total industrial waste generation and data for manufacturing industries andconstruction waste) are given in Table 2.2 for some countries. The total amount includes also other waste types
than those from manufacturing industries and construction. The data are based on weight of wet waste. Althoughsignificant amounts of industrial waste are generated, the rates of recycling/reuse are often high, and the fractionof degradable organic material from industrial waste disposed at solid waste disposal sites is often less than thatof MSW. Incineration of industrial waste may take place in significant amounts, however this will vary fromcountry to country. Composting or other biological treatment is restricted to waste from industries producing
food and other putrescible waste. Countries for which no national data on industrial waste generation can beobtained and whose data are not given in Table 2.2, are encouraged to use data from countries, or a cluster ofcountries, with similar circumstances. Chapter 2, Approaches to Data Collection, in Volume 1 gives generalguidance on data collection.
The data in Table 2.2 do not include data on industrial waste management practices. When country-specific dataon industrial waste management are not available from other sources, the management can be assumed to follow
the same pattern as management of MSW (see Table 2.1). For more accurate data, the inventory compilers areencouraged to contact relevant sources of information in the country, such as governmental agencies and local
authorities responsible for industrial waste management as well as industrial organisations.

4

For some European countries, data on sewage waste disposal is collected by Eurostat (2005).

5

The default values provided in Table 2.1 do not include industrial solid waste.

2.82006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

TABLE 2.2
INDUSTRIAL WASTE GENERATION IN SELECTED COUNTRIES(1,000 tonnes per year)
Region/ Country
Asia
China
Japan
SingaporeRepublic of Korea
IsraelEuropeAustria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
FinlandFranceGermany
GreeceHungary
Iceland
IrelandItaly
LatviaMalta
Netherlands
NorwayPolandPortugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
SwedenSwitzerland
TurkeyUK
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand

Total

Manufacturing
Industries

Construction

120 050

76 24039 81028 75014 28414 144
3 145
1 600
9 618
2 950

27 500
9 046
7
142
5 083
3 220

15 281
98 00047 960
6 680
2 605
10
5 361
35 392422
25
17 595415
58 975
8 356
797
6 715
1 493
20 30818 6901 470
1 166
50 000

1 420

1 004 280
1 423.5
1 000

1 261.5

1 103

37 0401 750

231 000
1 800
707
3 651
27 291
7206
23 800
4
143
85
223

6 390
72 00010NR

Data are based on weight of wet waste.
The data are default data for the year 2000, although for some countries the year for which the data are applicable
was not given in the reference, or data for the year 2000 were not available.
References:Environmental Statistics Yearbook of China (2003)
Eurostat (2005)
Latvian Environment Agency (2004)
OECD (2002)
National environmental agency, Singapore (2001)
Estonian Environment Information Centre (2003)
Statistics Finland (2005)
Milleubalans (2005)

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.9

Volume 5: Waste

Country-specific industrial waste generation data
Some countries have statistical data on industrial waste generation and management. It is good practice to use
country-specific data on industrial waste generation, waste composition (see Section 3.2.2) as well as
management practices as the basis for the emission estimation. The data should to the extent possible becollected by industry types. If the available data cover only part of industry or industrial waste types, this limited
availability should be documented clearly in the inventory report, as well as efforts made to complement the datato cover all industrial waste.

Data for the waste stream analyses
Approaches following the streams of waste from one treatment to another taking the changes in composition andother parameters affecting the emissions discussed in Section 2.2.1 could be used also for industrial waste. Data
could be collected using surveys or be collected plant-by-plant.

2.2.4

Other waste

Clinical waste: These wastes include materials like plastic syringes, animal tissues, bandages, cloths, etc. Somecountries choose to include these items in the MSW. Clinical waste is usually incinerated. However, someclinical waste may be disposed in SWDS. No regional or country-specific default data are given for clinicalwaste generation and management. In most countries, the amount of greenhouse gas emissions due to clinicalwaste appears to be insignificant. Default DOC and fossil carbon content in clinical waste are given in Section
2.3.4, Table 2.6.
Hazardous waste: Waste oil, waste solvents, ash, cinder and other wastes with hazardous nature, such as
flammability, explosiveness, causticity, and toxicity, are included in hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes are
generally collected, treated and disposed separately from non-hazardous MSW and industrial waste streams.
Some hazardous wastes are incinerated and can contribute to the fossil CO2 emissions from incineration (seeChapter 5) (Eurostat, 2005)6. Neutralisation and cement solidification are also treatment processes for hazardous
waste. These processes applied together to organic sludge or other liquid-like waste with hazardous nature canreduce (or delay) greenhouse gas emissions at SWDS by isolation. In many countries it is prohibited to dispose
hazardous waste at SWDS without pre-treatment. Emissions from solid waste disposal of hazardous waste arelikely to be small. No regional or country-specific default data are given for hazardous waste generation andmanagement. Default DOC and fossil carbon content in hazardous waste are given in Section 2.3.4, Table 2.6.
Agricultural waste: Manure management and burning of agricultural residues are considered in the AFOLU
Volume. Agricultural waste which will be treated and/or disposed with other solid waste may however be
included in MSW or industrial waste. For example, such waste may include manure, agricultural residues, deadbody of live stock, plastic film for greenhouse and mulch.

6

Eurostat (2005) collects data based on national statistics from European countries on hazardous waste generation andtreatment.

2.10

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

2.3

WASTE COMPOSITION

2.3.1

Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)

Waste composition is one of the main factors influencing emissions from solid waste treatment, as different
waste types contain different amount of degradable organic carbon (DOC) and fossil carbon. Waste
compositions, as well as the classifications used to collect data on waste composition in MSW vary widely in
different regions and countries.
In this Volume, default data on waste composition in MSW are provided for the following waste types:(1)food waste(2)

garden (yard) and park waste(3)

paper and cardboard

(4)

wood

(5)

textiles(6)

nappies (disposable diapers)(7)

rubber and leather(8)

plastics

(9)

metal

(10)

glass (and pottery and china)(11)other (e.g., ash, dirt, dust, soil, electronic waste)

Waste types from (1) to (6) contain most of the DOC in MSW. Ash, dust, rubber and leather contain also certain
amounts of non-fossil carbon, but this is hardly degradable. Some textiles, plastics (including plastics indisposable nappies), rubber and electronic waste contain the bulk part of fossil carbon in MSW. Paper (withcoatings) and leather (synthetic) can also include small amounts of fossil carbon.
Regional and country-specific default data on waste composition in MSW are given in Table 2.3. These data are
based on weight of wet waste. Table 2.3 does not give default data for garden and park waste and nappies. In the
Tier 1 default method these waste fractions can be assumed to be zero, i.e., they can be assumed to beencompassed by the other waste types.

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.11

40.3

43.5

41.1

South-Central Asia

South-Eastern Asia

Western Asia & Middle East

43.4

51.1
23

40.4

Middle Africa

Northern Africa

Southern Africa

Western Africa

23.8

36.9

24.2

Northern Europe

Southern Europe

Western Europe

67.5

Rest of Oceania

43.8

44.9

46.9

Central America

South America

Caribbean

17.0

17.1

13.7

23.2

6.0

30.0

27.5

17.0

30.6

21.8

9.8

25

16.5

16.8

7.7

18.0

12.9

11.3

18.8

Paper/cardboard

2.4

4.7

13.5

6.2

2.5

24.0

11.0

10.6

10.0

7.5

4.4

15

2

6.5

7.0

9.8

9.9

7.9

3.5

Wood

5.1

2.6

2.6

3.9

2.0

4.7

1.0

2.5

2.5

1.7

2.9

2.7

2.5

3.5

Textiles

1.9

0.7

1.8

1.4

1.4

1.1

0.6

0.9

0.8

1.0

Rubber/leather

TABLE 2.3
MSW COMPOSITION DATA BY PERCENT - REGIONAL DEFAULTS

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

33.9

North America

America

36.0

Australia and New Zealand

Oceania

30.1

Eastern Europe

Europe53.9

Eastern Africa

Africa26.2

Food waste

Eastern Asia

Asia

RegionVolume 5: Waste

9.9

10.8

6.7

8.5

13.0

6.2

3.0

4.5

4.5

5.5

6.3

7.2

6.4

14.3

Plastic

5.0

2.9

2.6

4.6

7.0

3.6

1.0

3.5

3.5

1.8

1.3

3.3

3.8

2.7

Metal

5.7

3.3

3.7

6.5

8.0

10.0

2

2.0

2.3

2.2

4.0

3.5

3.1

Glass

3.5

13.0

12.3

9.8

14.6

1.5

1.5

11.6

5.4

16.3

21.9

7.4

2.12

Other

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

López et al. (2002)

MAG/SSERNMA/DOA-PNUD/UNITAR (1999)

U.S. EPA (1997)

Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil (2002)

López, C. (2006). Personal Communication.

Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Medio Ambiente/Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable y Política Ambiental (1999)

OPS/OMS (1997)

JICA (1991)

Monreal (1998)

BID/OPS/OMS (1997)

U.S. EPA (2002)

CONADE/SEDUE (1992); INE/SMARN (2000)

www.climatechange.govt.nz/resources/reports/nir-apr04

www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics/wastats/mwb0203/wbch04.htm

Shimura et al. (2001)

Vishwanathan and Trakler (2003a and b)

Hoornweg (1999)

Doorn and Barlaz (1995)

Sources:

Note 2: The region-specific values are calculated from national, partly incomplete composition data. The percentages given may therefore not add up to 100%. Some regions may not have data for some waste types blanks in the table represent missing data.

Note 1: Data are based on weight of wet waste of MSW without industrial waste at generation around year 2000.

TABLE 2.3 (CONTINUED)MSW COMPOSITION DATA BY PERCENT - REGIONAL DEFAULTS

2.13

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition and Management Data

Volume 5: Waste

Default values for DOC and fossil carbon content in different waste types is given in Table 2.4. Table 2.4 gives
default values also for garden and park waste, and disposable nappies. These waste types were not included inTable 2.3 due to lack of data. All fractions in the Table 2.4 are given as percentages.

TABLE 2.4
DEFAULT DRY MATTER CONTENT, DOC CONTENT, TOTAL CARBON CONTENT AND FOSSIL CARBON FRACTION OF
DIFFERENT MSW COMPONENTS
MSW component

Dry matter
DOC content
content in % in % of wet waste
of wet weight 1

DOC content
in % of dry waste

Total carbon
content
in % of dry weight

Fossil carbon
fraction in % of
total carbon
Default

Range

Default

Default

Range

Default

Range 2

Default

Range

Paper/cardboard

90

40

36 - 4544

40 - 5046

42 - 501

0-5

Textiles 3

80

24

20 - 4030

25 - 50

50

25 - 50

20

0 - 50Food waste

40

15

8 - 2038

20 - 5038

20 - 50--43

39 - 4650

46 - 5450

46 - 54--20

18 - 2249

45 - 5549

45 - 55

85

4

Wood
Garden and Park
waste
Nappies40

24

18 - 3260

44 - 8070

54 - 901010Rubber and Leather

84(39) 5(39) 5(47) 5(47) 5

67

67

20

20

Plastics

40

0

0

100

-

-

-

-

75

67 - 85100

95 - 100

6

100

-

-

-

-

NA

NA

NA

NA

Glass 6

100

-

-

-

-

NA

NA

NA

NA

Other, inert waste

90

-

-

-

-

3

0-5

100

50 - 100

Metal

1

The moisture content given here applies to the specific waste types before they enter the collection and treatment. In samples taken fromcollected waste or from e.g., SWDS the moisture content of each waste type will vary by moisture of co-existing waste and weather
during handling.

2

The range refers to the minimum and maximum data reported by Dehoust et al., 2002; Gangdonggu, 1997; Guendehou, 2004; JESC,
2001; Jager and Blok, 1993; Würdinger et al., 1997; and Zeschmar-Lahl, 2002.

3

40 percent of textile are assumed to be synthetic (default). Expert judgement by the authors.

4This value is for wood products at the end of life. Typical dry matter content of wood at the time of harvest (that is for garden and park
waste) is 40 percent. Expert judgement by the authors.

5

Natural rubbers would likely not degrade under anaerobic condition at SWDS (Tsuchii et al., 1985; Rose and Steinbüchel, 2005).

6

Metal and glass contain some carbon of fossil origin. Combustion of significant amounts of glass or metal is not common.

DOC values for different waste types, which are derived from analyses based on sampling during waste collection
at SWDS or at incineration facilities, may include impurities, e.g., traces of food in glass and plastic waste. Carbon
contents of paper, textiles, nappies, rubber and plastic may also be different between countries and at different time
periods. These analyses may therefore result in DOC estimates different from those given in Table 2.4. It is goodpractice to use DOC values consistently with the way the waste composition data are derived.
The best composition data can be obtained by routine monitoring at the gate of SWDS or incineration and othertreatment facilities. If these data are not available, composition data obtained at generation and/or transportation,
treatment and recycling facilities can be used for disposed DOC estimations using waste stream analysis (see Box
2.1).
Waste can be sampled at pits in waste treatment facilities, at loading yards in transportation stations and SWDS.
Composition data of disposed waste can be obtained from field sampling at SWDS. The amount of waste(typically more than 1 m3 for a representative sample) should be separated manually into each item and weighedby item in order to obtain wet weight composition. A certain amount of each item should be reduced andsampled by quartering and used for chemical analysis including moisture and DOC. Samples should be taken on
different days of the week.
MSW composition will vary by city in a same country. It will also vary by the day of the week, season and year
in the same city. National representative (or average) composition data should be obtained from sampling atseveral typical cities on same days of the week in each season. Sampling at SWDS on rainy days will change
moisture content (i.e., wet weight composition) significantly, and needs attention in interpretation of that inannual data.

2.14

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition, and Management Data

Analyses to determine the national waste composition should be based on appropriate sampling methods (seeVolume 1, Chapter 2, Approaches to Data Collection) and be repeated periodically to cover changes in waste
generation and management. The sampling methods, frequency of sampling and implications on time series
should be documented.
The default DOC values given in Table 2.4 are used in estimating CH4 emissions from and carbon stored in
SWDS (see Chapter 3). The default total carbon contents and fossil carbon fractions for estimating fossil CO2
emissions from incineration and open burning are also given in Table 2.4.

2.3.2

SludgeThe DOC content in sludge will vary depending on the wastewater treatment method producing the sludge, andalso be different for domestic and industrial sludge.
For domestic sludge, the default DOC value (as percentage of wet waste assuming a default dry matter content of
10 percent) is 5 percent (range 4 - 5 percent, which means that the DOC content would be 40-50 percent of dry
matter).
A rough default value of 9 percent DOC (assuming the dry matter content to be 35 percent) can be used forindustrial sludge, when country and/or industry-specific is not available. The default DOC value applies for totalindustrial sludge in a country. Sewage, food industry, textile industry and chemical industry will generateorganic sludge. DOC is also found in sludge from water work and dredging. The DOC in sludge can vary muchby industry type. Examples of carbon contents in some organic sludge (percentage of dry matter) in Japan are: 27
percent for pulp and paper industry, 30 percent for food industry and 52 percent for chemical industry (Yamada
et al., 2003).

2.3.3

Industrial waste

The average composition of industrial waste is very different from the average composition of MSW, and varies
by type of industry, although many of the waste types can be included in both of industrial waste and MSW.
DOC and fossil carbon in industrial waste is mainly found in the same waste types as in MSW. DOC is found in
paper and cardboard, textiles, food and wood. Synthetic leather, rubber, and plastics are major sources of fossil
carbon. Waste oils and solvents are also important sources of fossil carbon in industrial liquid waste. Paper andcardboard and plastics will be generated at various industries mainly from office work and by packaging waste.
Wood will be found in wastes from pulp and paper, wood manufacturing industries and construction anddemolition activities. Food, beverage and tobacco industry will be the major source of food waste. Details of
product and/or activity of each industry are different country by country. In order to estimate the DOC and fossil
carbon in industrial waste, surveys on waste generation and composition at representative industries andestimation of unit generation of certain composition per economic driver, such as production, floor area andemployee number, can be used. Non-hazardous waste (like office waste and waste from catering) from industrial
activities is sometimes included in MSW. Double counting of the emissions should be avoided.
Table 2.5 provides default values of DOC and fossil carbon contents in industrial waste by industry type peramount waste produced. The default values are only for process waste generated at the facilities (e.g., officewaste is assumed to be included in MSW). Countries are encouraged to collect and use national data whereavailable as the default data are very uncertain. The guidance given above and in Chapter 2 of Volume 1 can beused to develop data collection systems for industrial waste. The DOC and fossil carbon contents can be
determined using the same sampling methods as for MSW.

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.15

Volume 5: Waste

TABLE 2.5
DEFAULT DOC AND FOSSIL CARBON CONTENT IN INDUSTRIAL WASTE (PERCENTAGE IN WET WASTE PRODUCED)1
Industry type

DOC

Fossil carbon

Total carbon

Water content 2

Food, beverages and tobacco (other than sludge)

15

-

15

60

Textile

24

16

40

20

Wood and wood products

43

-

43

15

Pulp and paper (other than sludge)

40

1

41

10

Petroleum products, Solvents, Plastics

-

80

80

0

17

56

16

Rubber(39)

3Construction and demolition

4

20

24

0

Other 4

1

3

4

10

Source: Expert Judgement; Pipatti et al. 1996; Yamada et al. 2003.
1

The default values apply only for process waste from the industries, office and other similar waste are assumed to be included in MSW.

2

Note that water contents of industrial wastes vary enormously, even within a single industry.

3

Natural rubbers would likely not degrade under anaerobic condition at SWDS (Tsuchii, et al., 1985; Rose and Steinbüchel, 2005).

4

These values can be used also as defaults for total waste from manufacturing industries, when data on waste production by industry typeare not available. Waste from mining and quarrying should be excluded from the calculations as the amounts can be large and the DOC
and fossil carbon contents are likely to be negligible.

2.3.4

Other waste

Default values for DOC and fossil carbon for hazardous waste and clinical waste are given in Table 2.6. The
values should be applied only for total amounts of hazardous and clinical waste generated in the country. Major
part of hazardous waste would be generated as sludge or liquid-like nature, as well as ash, cinder and slug which
are dry nature.

TABLE 2.6
DEFAULT DOC AND FOSSIL CARBON CONTENTS IN OTHER WASTE (PERCENTAGE IN WET WASTE PRODUCED)
Waste type

DOC

Fossil carbon

Hazardous wasteNA5 - 50

Clinical waste

15

25

1

Total carbon

Water Content

NA

10 - 90 1

4035

NA = not available
Sources: Expert Judgement; IPCC 2000
1

The higher fossil carbon value is for waste with lower water content. When no data on the water content are available, the mean value ofthe range should be used.

2.16

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition, and Management Data

Annex 2A.1 Waste Generation and Management Data
- by country and regional averages
Table 2A.1 in this Annex shows MSW generation and management data for some countries whose data are
available. Regional defaults for waste generation and treatment that are provided in Table 2.1 in Chapter 2 arederived based on the information from this table. The data are applicable as default data for the year 2000.
For comparison, data on waste generation and disposal to SWDS from the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (1996 IPCC Guidelines) are also given in the table.
TABLE 2A.1
MSW GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA - BY COUNTRY AND REGIONAL AVERAGESRegion /Country

MSW 1, 2Generation
Rate

MSW 1, 2, 3
Generation
Rate

Fractionof MSW
disposed
to SWDS

Fraction
Fraction of
Fraction of Fraction ofof MSWother MSW
MSW
MSW
Sourcedisposedmanagement,
incinerated composted
5
to SWDS
unspecified

IPCC -1996
Year 2000
IPCC-1996
values 4(tonnes/cap/yr) values 4(tonnes/cap/yr )Asia
Eastern Asia
China
Japan
Rep. of Korea
Southern andCentral Asia
Bangladesh
India
Nepal
Sri Lanka
South-eastern
Asia
Indonesia
Lao PDR
Malaysia
MyanmarPhilippines
Singapore
Thailand
VietnamAfricaAfrica 6
Egypt
Sudan
South Africa
Nigeria
EuropeEastern Europe
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
LatviaLithuania
Poland

0.41
0.41
0.12
0.12

0.37
0.27
0.47
0.38
0.21
0.18
0.17
0.18
0.32

0.38
0.38
0.60
0.60

0.55
0.97
0.25
0.42

0.26
0.02
0.72
0.04

0.01
0.01
0.02

0.74

-

0.05

0.95
0.70
0.40
0.90

0.20

0.18
0.01
0.54

1
2, 31
3

0.21
0.05
0.10
0.60
0.10

4
4
4
4

0.27

0.59

0.09

0.05

0.27

0.28
0.25
0.30
0.16
0.19
0.40
0.40
0.20

0.80
0.40
0.70
0.60
0.62
0.20
0.80
0.60

0.05

0.10

0.05

0.10

0.05
0.60
0.15
0.40
0.28
0.22
0.05
0.40

4
4
4
4
4, 5
6
4
4

0.29

0.69
0.70
0.82
0.90
0.40

0.31
0.30
0.18
0.10
0.60

4
7
4
4

0.02
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00

8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8

0.29
1.00

0.38
0.52
0.33
0.44
0.45
0.27
0.31
0.32

0.9
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.98
0.92
0.92
1.00
0.98

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

0.10
0.58
0.05

0.04
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.08
0.04
0.00
0.00

0.10

0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02

2.17

Volume 5: Waste

TABLE 2A.1 (CONTINUED)MSW GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA - BY COUNTRY AND REGIONAL AVERAGESRegion /Country

MSW 1, 2Generation
Rate

MSW 1, 2, 3
Generation
Rate

Fractionof MSW
disposed
to SWDS

Fraction
Fraction of
Fraction of Fraction ofof MSWother MSW
MSW
MSW
Sourcedisposedmanagement,
incinerated composted
5
to SWDS
unspecified

IPCC -1996
Year 2000
IPCC-1996
values 4(tonnes/cap/yr) values 4(tonnes/cap/yr )Romania
0.36
Russian0.32
0.34
Federation
Slovakia
0.32
Slovenia
0.51
Northern Europe
0.64
Denmark
0.46
0.67
Finland0.62
0.50
Iceland1.00
Norway0.51
0.62
Sweden0.37
0.43Southern Europe
0.52
Cyprus0.68
Greece
0.31
0.41
Italy
0.34
0.50
Malta
0.48
Portugal
0.33
0.47
Spain
0.36
0.60
Turkey0.50
Western Europe
0.45
0.56
Austria
0.34
0.58
Belgium
0.40
0.47
France0.47
0.53
Germany
0.36
0.61
Ireland0.31
0.60
Luxemburg
0.49
0.66
Netherlands
0.58
0.62
Switzerland
0.40
0.40
UK
0.69
0.57
Central, South America and Caribbean states
Caribbean
0.49
Bahamas
0.95
Cuba
0.21
Dominican
0.25
Republic
St. Lucia
0.55
Central America
0.21
Costa Rica
0.17

0.94

0.2
0.77
0.75
0.44

0.93
0.88
0.86
0.85
0.57
0.4
0.43
0.46
0.66
1.0
0.35
0.67
0.23
0.90

1.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

8

0.71

0.19

0.00

0.10

9

1.00
0.90
0.47
0.10
0.61
0.86
0.55
0.23
0.85
1.00
0.91
0.70
1.00
0.69
0.68
0.99
0.47
0.30
0.17
0.43
0.30
0.89
0.27
0.11
1.00
0.82

0.00
0.00
0.24
0.53
0.1
0.06
0.15
0.39
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.19
0.07
0.00
0.22
0.10
0.32
0.33
0.24
0.00
0.55
0.36
0.00
0.07

0.00
0.08
0.08
0.16
0.07
0.01
0.09
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.14
0.00
0.05
0.16
0.01
0.15
0.37
0.23
0.12
0.17
0.01
0.18
0.28
0.00
0.03

0.00
0.02
0.20
0.22
0.22
0.06
0.22
0.29
0.05
0.00
0.08
0.09
0.00
0.07
0.09
0.00
0.15
0.23
0.28
0.13
0.29
0.11
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.08

8
8

8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8

0.83
0.7
0.90

0.02

0.15
0.3
0.1

10
11

0.90

0.06

0.04

12

0.17
0.50

13

0.83
0.50

8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8

Guatemala

0.22

0.40

0.60

Honduras
Nicaragua
South America
South America
Argentina
Bolivia

0.15
0.28

0.40
0.70

0.60
0.30

14, 1516,
17, 18
4
4

0.26
0.28
0.16

0.54
0.59
0.70

0.46
0.41
0.30

4
19

2.18

0.01

0.003

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition, and Management Data

TABLE 2A.1 (CONTINUED)MSW GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA - BY COUNTRY AND REGIONAL AVERAGESRegion /Country

MSW 1, 2Generation
Rate

MSW 1, 2, 3
Generation
Rate

Fractionof MSW
disposed
to SWDS

Fraction
Fraction of
Fraction of Fraction ofof MSWother MSW
MSW
MSW
Sourcedisposedmanagement,
incinerated composted
5
to SWDS
unspecified

IPCC -1996
Year 2000
IPCC-1996
values 4(tonnes/cap/yr) values 4(tonnes/cap/yr )BrazilChile
Colombia
EcuadorParaguay(Asuncion)
Peru
Uruguay
Venezuela
North America
North America

0.70

0.65

0.69

0.58

0.06

0.06

0.29

Canada

0.66

0.49

0.75

0.71

0.04

0.19

0.06

0.73

0.31
1.14

0.62

0.49
0.55

0.14

1.00
1.00
1.00

0.85
1.00
0.70

MexicoUSA
Oceania
Oceania
Australia
New Zealand

0.18

0.47
0.46
0.49

0.26
0.22

0.80
0.40
0.31
0.40

0.44

0.40

0.60

24

0.20
0.26
0.33

0.53
0.72
0.50

0.47
0.28
0.50

4, 25
26, 27
28

0.69
0.69

0.05

0.03

0.12
0.60
0.69
0.60

20, 21
4
22
23

0.51
0.31

29,
30, 3132, 33
34

0.15
0.30

4, 31
4

1

Data are based on weight of wet waste.
To obtain the total waste generation in the country, the per-capita values should be multiplied with the population whose waste iscollected. In many countries, especially developing countries, this encompasses only urban population.
3
The data are default data for the year 2000, although for some countries the year for which the data are applicable was not given in thereference, or data for the year 2000 were not available. The year for which the data are collected is given below with source of the data,
where available.
4
Values shown in this column are the ones included in the 1996 IPCC Guidelines.
5
Other, unspecified, includes data on recycling for some countries.
6
A regional average is given for the whole of Africa as data are not available for more detailed regions within Africa.
2

SourceYear

1

Urban Construction Statistics Yearbook of China – Year 2000 (2001). Ministry of Chinese Construction. Chinese
Construction Industry Publication Company.

2

OECD Environment Directorate, OECD Environmental Data 2002, Waste.

31) '97 National Status of Solid Waste Generation and Treatment , the Ministry of Environment, Korea, 1998.

Ministry of Environment, Japan (1992-2003): Waste of Japan, http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste/ippan.html.
2) '96 National Status of Solid Waste Generation and Treatment , the Ministry of Environment, Korea, 1997.
3) Korea Environmental Yearbook, the Ministry of Environment, Korea, 1990.
4

Doorn and Barlaz, 1995, Estimate of global methane emissions from landfills and open dumps, EPA-600/R-95-019,
Office of Research & Development, Washington DC, USA.

5

Shimura et al. (2001).

6

2001

7

8
9

National Environmental Agency, Singapore (www.nea.gov.sg. ) and
www.acrr.org/resourcecities/waste_resources/europe_waste.htm.
Ministry of Environment and Physical Development, Higher Council for Environment and Natural Resources,
Sudan (2003), Sudan's First National Communications under the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change.

2000

Eurostat (2005). Waste Generated and Treated in Europe. Data 1995-2003. European Commission - Eurostat,
Luxemburg. 131p.
Problems of waste management in Russia: Not-for-Profit Partnership “Waste Management – Strategic Ecological
Initiative” http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdEditBoards.nav?prodId=Journal201691.

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.19

Volume 5: Waste

TABLE 2A.1 (CONTINUED)MSW GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA- BY COUNTRY AND REGIONAL AVERAGES
Source

Year

10
11

The Bahamas Environment, Science and Technology Commission (2001). Commonwealth of the Bahamas. First
National Communication on Climate Change. Nassu, New Providence, April 2001, 121pp.
1990

12

13

OPS/OMS (1997). Análisis Sectorial de Residuos Sólidos en Cuba. Serie Análisis 1. Sectoriales No. 13,
Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 206 pp., 2. López, C., et al. (2002). República de Cuba. Inventario
Nacional de Emisiones y Absorciones de Gases de Invernadero (colectivo de autores). Reporte para el Año
1996/Actualización para los Años 1990 y 1994. CD-ROM Vol. 01. Instituto de Meteorología-AMA-CITMA. La
Habana, 320 pp. ISBN: 959-02-0352-3.
Secretaría de Estado de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2004). República Dominicana. Primera
Comunicación Nacional a la Convención Marco de Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. UNEP/GEF, Santo
Domingo, Marzo de 2004, 163 pp.

1990

Ministry of Planning, Development, Environment and Housing (2001). Saint Lucias’s Initial National
Communication on Climate Change, UNEP/GEF, 306 pp.

14

Lammers, P. E. M., J. F. Feenstra, A. A. Olstroorn (1998). Country/Region-Specific Emission Factors in National
Greenhouse Gas Inventories. UNEP/Institute for Environmental Studies Vrije Universiteit, 112 pp.

15

Ministerio de Recursos Naturales, Energía y Minas (1995). Inventario Nacional de Fuentes y Sumideros de Gases
con Efecto Invernadero en Costa Rica. MRNEM, Instituto Meteorológico Nacional, San José, Septiembre 1995.

16

Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (2001). República de Guatemala. Primera Comunicación Nacional
sobre Cambio Climático..

17

JICA (Agencia Japonesa de Cooperación Internacional) (1991). Estudio sobre el Manejo de los Desechos Sólidos en
el Area Metropolitana de la Ciudad de Guatemala. Volumen 1.

18

Guatemala de la Asunción, diciembre 2001, 127 p.,OPS/OMS (1995). Análisis Sectorial de Residuos Sólidos en
Guatemala, Diciembre 1995, 183 pp.

19

1990

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo (FNDR). Cantidad de RSM dispuestos en RSA-años 1996 y 1997, La Paz, Bolivia.,
2. Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y Medio Ambiente/Secretaría Nacional de Recursos Naturales y Medio
Ambiente (1997). Inventariación de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero. Bolivia – 1990.
MDSMA/SNRNMA/SMA/PNCC/U.S. CSP, La Paz, 1997.

20

Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil (2002). First Brazilian Inventory of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. Background Reports. Methane Emissions from Waste Treatment and Disposal. CETESB. 1990 and
1994, Brazília, DF, 85 pp.

21

CETESB (1992). Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamiento Ambiental. Programa de gerenciamiento de residuos
sólidos domiciliares e de services de saúde. PROLIXO, CETESB; Sao Paulo, 29 pp., IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro deGeografía e Estadística. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estadistica/populacao/atlassaneamiento/pdf/mappag59.pdf
in November 2004.

22

1990

23

Ministerio de Medio Ambiente/IDEAM (1999). República de Colombia. Inventario Nacional de Fuentes y
Sumideros de Gases de Efecto Invernadero. 1990. Módulo Residuos, Santa Fe de Bogotá, DC, Marzo de 1999, 14
pp.
BID/OPS/OMS (1997). Diagnóstico de la Situación del Manejo de los Residuos Sólidos Municipales en América
Latina y el Caribe., Doorn and Barlaz, 1995, Estimate of global methane emissions from landfills and open dumps,
EPA-600/R-95-019, Office of Research & Development, Washington DC, USA.

24

1990

MAG/SSERNMA/DOA – PNUD/UNITAR (1999). Paraguay: Inventario Nacional de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
por Fuentes y Sumideros. Año 1990. Proyecto PAR GLO/95/G31. Asunción, Noviembre 1999, 90 pp.

25

1990
1994
1998

Estudios CEPIS-OPS y/o Estudio Sectorial de Residuos Sólidos del Perú. Ditesa/OPS., Lammers, P. E. M., J. F.
Feenstra, A. A. Olstroorn (1998). Country/Region-Specific Emission Factors in National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories. UNEP/Institute for Environmental Studies Vrije Universiteit, 112 pp.

26

Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial y Medio Ambiente/Dirección Nacional de Medio
Ambiente/Unidad de Cambio Climático (1998). Uruguay. Inventario Nacional de Emisiones Netas de Gases deEfecto Invernadero 1994/Estudio Comparativo de Emisiones Netas de Gases de Efecto Invernadero para 1990 y
1994. Montevideo, Noviembre de 1998, 363pp.

27

OPS/OMS (1996). Análisis Sectorial de Residuos Só,Ministerio de Vivienda, Ordenamiento Territorial y Medio
Ambiente/Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente/Unidad de Cambio Climático (2004). Uruguay. Segunda
Comunicación a la CMNUCC. 330p. lidos en Uruguay. Plan Regional de Inversiones en Medio Ambiente y Salud,Marzo 1996.

28

2000

Ministerio del Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables. Ministerio de Energía y Minas (1996).
Venezuela. Inventario de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero. Año 1990. GEF/UNEP/U.S CSP.

29

1992

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/15/24111692.PDF

2.20

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition, and Management Data

TABLE 2A.1 (CONTINUED)MSW GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT DATA- BY COUNTRY AND REGIONAL AVERAGES
SourceYear

30

The Fraser Institute, Environmental Indicators, 4th Edition (2000).
http://oldfraser.lexi.net/publications/critical_issues/2000/env_indic/section_05.html.

31

UNFCCC Secretariat, Working paper No.3 (g) (2000). Expert report, prepared for the UNFCCC secretariat, 20
February 2000.

32

1992

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/11/15/24111692.PDF.

33

INE/SMARN (2000). Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases de Invernadero 1994-1998, Ciudad de Mexico,
Octubre 2000, 461 p.

34

Waste generation from: BioCycle (January 2004). "14th Annual BioCycle Nationwide Survey: The State of
Garbage in America", Waste disposition from: BioCycle (December 2001). "13th Annual BioCycle Nationwide
Survey: The State of Garbage in America"; Personal Communication: Elizabeth Scheele, U.S. EPA.

References
BID/OPS/OMS (1997). Diagnóstico de la Situación del Manejo de los Residuos Sólidos Municipales en
América Latina y el Caribe.
CONADE/SEDUE (1992). Informe de la Situación General en Materia de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al
Ambiente 1989-1990. (Actualizado por la Dirección General de Servicios Urbanos, DDF, 1992.Dehoust,G., Gebhardt, P., Gärtner, S. (2002). Der Beitrag der thermischen Abfallbehandlung zu Klimaschutz,
Luftreinhaltung und Ressourcenschonung [The contribution of thermal waste treatment to climate change
mitigation, air quality and resource management]. For: Interessengemeinschaft der Betreiber Thermischer
Abfallbehandlungsanlagen in Deutschland (ITAD). Öko-Institut, Darmstadt 2002 [In German].
Dehoust, G., et al. (2002). Dehoust, G., Gebhardt, P., Gärtner, S., Der Beitrag der thermischen Abfallbehandlung
zu Klimaschutz, Luftreinhaltung und Ressourcenschonung [The contribution of thermal waste treatment
to climate change mitigation, air quality and resource management]. For: Interessengemeinschaft derBetreiber Thermischer Abfallbehandlungsanlagen in Deutschland (ITAD). Öko-Institut, Darmstadt 2002
[In German].
Doorn, M. and Barlaz, M. (1995). Estimate of global methane emissions from landfills and open dumps, EPA600/R-95-019, Office of Research & Development, Washington DC, USA.
Environmental Statistics Yearbook of China (2003).
URL:http://www.cnemc.cn/stat/indexs.asp?id=15 (in Chinese)
Estonian Environment Information Centre. (2003). URL: http://www.keskkonnainfo.ee/english/waste
Eurostat (2005). Waste Generated and Treated in Europe. Data 1995-2003, European Commission -Eurostat,
Luxemburg. 131 p.
Gangdonggu Go"mi (1997). Study on the situation of wastes discharge in Gangdonggu. (Institute ofMetropolitan), Seoul (University of Seoul) 1997.2
Guendehou, G.H.S. (2004). Open-Burning of Waste. Discussion Paper. Fifth Authors/Experts Meeting : Waste,
2-4 November 2004, Ottawa, Canada, in the Preparation of the 2006 IPCC National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories Guidelines.
Hoornweg, D. T. L. (1999). What A Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia, The International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, p 42.
INE/SMARN. (2000). Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Gases de Invernadero 1994-1998. Ciudad de Mexico,
Octubre 2000. 461 p.
IPCC (1997). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Inventories. Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho,
L.G., Lim, B., Tréanton, K., Mamaty, I., Bonduki, Y., Griggs, D.J. and Callander B.A. (Eds),
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), IPCC/OECD/IEA, Paris, France.

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.21

Volume 5: Waste

Jager, D. de and Blok, K. (1993). Koolstofbalans van het avfalsysteem in Nederland [Carbon balance of thewaste management system in the Netherlands]. For: Rijksinstituut vor Volksgezondheid en Mileuhygiene
RIVM. Ecofys, Utrecht [In Dutch].
JESC (2001). Fact Book: Waste Management & Recycling in JAPAN, Japan Environmental Sanitation Center,
Kanagawa.
JICA (1991). Estudio sobre el Manejo de los Desechos Sólidos en el Area Metropolitana de la Ciudad deGuatemala. Volumen 1. Agencia Japonesa de Cooperación Internacional.
Latvian Environment Agency (2004). Economy-wide Natural Resources Flow Assessment (in Latvian: Resursu
patēriņa novērtējums), pages 84-85, The Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Latvia, Riga.
ISBN (in English) 9984-9557-6-1 (URL: http://www.lvgma.gov.lv/produkti/rpn2004/MFA.pdf)
López, C., et al. (2002). República de Cuba. Inventario Nacional de Emisiones y Absorciones de Gases deInvernadero (colectivo de autores). Reporte para el Año 1996/Actualización para los Años 1990 y 1994.
CD-ROM Vol. 01. Instituto de Meteorología-AMA-CITMA. La Habana, 320 pp. ISBN: 959-02-0352-3.
López, C. (2006). Personal Communication.
MAG/SSERNMA/DOA – PNUD/UNITAR (1999). Paraguay: Inventario Nacional de Gases de Efecto
Invernadero por Fuentes y Sumideros. Año 1990. Proyecto PAR GLO/95/G31. Asunción, Noviembre
1999, 90 pp
Milleubalans (2005). Milleu en Natuur Planbureau. ISBN 90-6969-120-6.
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social y Medio Ambiente/Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable y Política Ambiental(1999). Inventario de Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero de la República Argentina. Año 1997.
Manejo de Residuos. Buenos Aires, Octubre 1999, p 146.
Ministry of Environment, Japan (1992-2003). Waste of Japan,
URL: http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste/ippan.html
Ministry of Environment, Korea (1998). '97 National Status of Solid Waste Generation and Treatment’, Korea.
URL: http://www.me.go.kr/ (in Korea)
Ministry of Environment, Korea (1997). '96 National Status of Solid Waste Generation and Treatment’, Korea.
URL: http://www.me.go.kr/ (in Korea)
Ministry of Environment, Korea (1990). Korea Environmental Yearbook, Korea.
URL: http://www.me.go.kr/ (in Korea)
Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil (2002). First Brazilian Inventory of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. Background Reports. Methane Emissions from Waste Treatment and Disposal. CETESB.
1990 and 1994, Brazília, DF, 85 pp. Monreal, J. C. (1998). Gestión de Residuos Sólidos en América
Latina y el Caribe. OEA. Programa Interamericano de Cooperación en Tecnologías Ambientales en
Sectores Claves de la Industria. URL: http://www.idrc/industry/brazil_s9htlm.
National Environmental Agency, Singapore (2001). URL: www.nea.gov.sg, andwww.acrr.org/resourcecities/waste_resources/europe_waste.htm
OECD (2002). OECD Environmental Data. Waste. Compendium 2002. Environmental Performance andInformation Division, Environment Directorate, Organization for Economic Cooperation andDevelopment (OECD), Working Group on Environmental Information and Outlooks. 27 p.
URL: http://www.oecd.org
OPS/OMS (1997). Análisis Sectorial de Residuos Sólidos en Cuba. Serie Análisis 1. Sectoriales No. 13,
Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 206 pp., 2.
Pipatti, R., Hänninen, K., Vesterinen, R., Wihersaari, M. and Savolainen, I. (1996). Impact of waste management
alternative on greenhouse gas emissions, Espoo, VTT Julkaisuja - Publikationer. 85 p. (In Finnish)
Rose, K. and Steinbüchel, A. (2005). ‘Biodegradation of natural rubber and related compounds: recent insights
into a hardly understood catabolic capability of microorganisms’, Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, June 2005, 2803-2812.
Shimura, S., Yokota, I. and Nitta, Y. (2001). Research for MSW Flow Analysis in Developing Nations. J. Mater
cycles waste manag., 3, p. 48-59
Statistics Finland (2005). Environmental Statistics. Environment and Natural Resources. 2005:2, Helsinki, 208 p.

2.22

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Chapter 2: Waste Generation, Composition, and Management Data

Tsuchii, A., Suzuki, T. and Takeda, K. (1985). ‘Microbial degradation of natural rubber vulacnizates’, Appliedand Environmental Microbiology, Oct. 1985, p. 965-970.
UNFCCC Secretariat (2000). Working paper No.3 (g), Expert report, prepared for the UNFCCC secretariat, 20
February 2000.
U.S.EPA (1997). Evaluation of Emissions from the Open Burning of Household Waste in Barrels, Volume1,
Technical Report, United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Control Technology
Center.
U.S.EPA (2002). Solid Waste Management and Greenhouse Gases, 2nd Ed, United States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), EPA530-R-02-006.
Vishwanathan,C. and Trakler, J. (2003a). ‘Municipal solid waste management in Asia’, ARPPET Report, Asian
Institute of Technology.
Vishwanathan,C. and Trakler, J. (2003b). Municipal solid waste management in Asia: A comparative analysis.
In Proc. of the workshop on Sustainable landfill management, 3-5 Dec. 2003, Anna University, p 5 & 40.
Würdinger, E., et al. (1997) Studie über die energetische Nutzung der Biomasseanteile in Abfällen [Study on theenergy recovery of the biomass fraction in waste]. For: Bayerisches Staatsministerium fürLandesentwicklung und Umweltfragen. Bayerisches Institut für Abfallforschung (BifA), Würdinger, E.,
Wagner, J., Tränkler, J., Rommel, W. Augsburg 1997 (In German).
Yamada, M., Ishigaki, T., Tachio, K. and Inue, Y. (2003). Carbon flow and landfill methane emissions inJapanese waste stream. Sardinia 2003, Nineth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium,
Cagliari, Italy.
Zeschmar-Lahl, B. (2002). Die Klimarelevanz der Abfallwirtschaft im Freistaat Sachsen [The relevance ofclimate change for waste management in the federal state of Saxonia]. For: Sächsisches Ministerium fürUmwelt und Landwirtschaft. BZL, Oyten 2002 (In German).

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

2.23