Disclaimer
This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC
member countries.
The views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of
the ADRC. The boundaries and names shown and the designations usedon the maps in the report also do not imply official endorsement or
acceptance by the ADRC.

Philippine Disasteri k Management
Risk
System: NDRRMC’s
Policies,Pli iPlans,
Pl
and Programs
ANNA-LISA DUMAGUING ORALLOOFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSE
16 AUGUST 2011

Scope of Presentation

GeneralGene alInformationon thePhilippines

Philippine
Phili iDisaster
ProfileThe Philippine
DisasterManagement
System: An
Overview

Current
Disaster Risk
Reduction
Strategies andInitiatives

Introduction
The Philippines is anarchipelagic nation located inSoutheast Asia, comprising 7,107
islands spanning 1,840
islands,
1 840 kms from
north to south.
 Total land area - 300,000 sq. kms.
 Coastlines - 36,000 kilometers, thelongest coastlines in the world Bounded by three large bodies ofwater:
on the west and north - by theSouth China Sea
on theth eastt - by
b the
th P
Pacific
ifi
Ocean
on the south - by the Celebes
Sea and the coastal watersof Borneo

TopographyThree major island groups:
Luzon - largest island group with
141,000 sq. kms.
Mindanao - second with 102,000 sq.
kms.
y - third with 57,
57,000 sq.
q kms.
VisayasLuzon is the most mountainous withextensive valleys and plains running
through its interiors
 Three major mountain ranges in the area:
the Sierra Madre, the Central Cordillera
and the Caraballo Mountains
 The southern portion of the island has adominantly volcanic topography withridges and valleys of gentle slope andgenerally accordant drainage
 Active volcanoes such as Mt Pinatubo,
Mayon Volcano and Mt Bulusan are foundin this group of islandsTopography
 Visayas Island - located in thecentral Philippines,pp, has a severe
dissection of topography due to its
exposure to typhoons from Pacificand torrential rains
 characterized by mountains and hills(where peaks reach 900m), river
basins, floodplains, plateaus andvalleys Mindanao - has diverse structuralelements and different forms ofphysiographic development
includingg fault block mountains,,
volcanic peaks, uplifted plateaus, lowflat basins, a notable fault zone which
also cuts through Luzon and Visayas,
fissure low masses, and incisedvalleys and canyons.
 Major mountain ranges: the Easternor Pacific Cordillera, the BukidnonDavao Rangeg

Climate Tropical marine climate (hasg temperaturep
and warm air
highcurrents flow over its landmasses) Dominated by two major

seasons: wet and dry seasons The summer (southwest)

monsoon brings heavy rains tomost of the archipelago from
June to November The winter (northeast) monsoon

brings cooler and drier air from
December to May
 Mean annual temperature is

26.6ºC 28.3ºC during summer months

Climate
 25.5ºC duringdrainy monthsh Rainfall is the most important climaticelement in the Philippines.
 Rainfall distribution throughout thecountry varies from one region toanother depending upon the direction
another,of the moisture-bearing winds and thelocation of the mountain systems.
 Mean annual rainfall varies from 965 to

4,064 millimeters annually

Mabuhay!
byPopulationPl ti - 90
million as of 2010
Filipino – official
language
90% of the population
are Catholics
Agriculture is theprimary source of
livelihood in the country.

Disaster Risk
ProfileDisaster Risk Profile

The proneness of the Philippine archipelago to hazards is defined by its location andnatural attributes as it is situated in the Pacific Ring of Fire where two major tectonic plates(Philippine Sea and Eurasian) meet. This explains the occurrence of earthquakes andtsunamis as well as the existence of around 300 volcanoes of which 22 are classified as
active because their eruptions have been found in historical records. The Philippines is also
located along the typhoon belt in the Western North Pacific Basin in the Pacific where 66
percent of tropicalppcyclonesyenter or originate.
g
On the average,
g , the countryy faces 20 tropicalpcyclones a year, of which 5 to 7 can be rather destructive.

Disaster Risk Profile

Other threats that warrant attention are complex emergencies that areprimarily human-induced, often associated with armed conflict. Issues related
to internally displaced persons (IDPs) are part of dealing with such threats.
The country has also been preparing for regional and emerging risks such asavian
i influenza,
i flweapons off mass destruction,diandd climatelichange.
h• From 1970 – 2009, annual
average direct damage todisasters ranged fromPHP 5 Billion to PHP15 Billion((US $100 Million to US $300
Million), indirect andsecondary impacts further
increase this cost
• Cost of direct damage isequivalent to more than 0.5 %of the national GDP• Annual average casualties due
to natural disasters - 1,002• Flooding
as theFl dith topmostttdisaster during the last five (5)yearsDisaster Situation in the Philippines
From 1970 to 2009
290 Destructive Typhoonsout of the 783 tropical cyclones
Major Flooding
in 1991 (Ormoc City Tragedy)
5 Major Landslides:
 1999 (Cherry Hills Tragedy) 2000000 (Payatas( ayatas Tragedy)
agedy)
 2004 & 2006 (Southern Leyte)
 2004 (Quezon)
2 Major Volcanic Eruptions:
 1991 (Mt Pinatubo)
 1993 (Mt Mayon)

2 Major El Nino Phenomenon:
 1998 20099 Major Earthquakes:
 1968 (Casiguran, Aurora) 1973 (Ragay Gulf)
 1976 ((Moro Gulf))
 1990 (Luzon, Bohol, & Panay)
 1994 (Mindoro Oriental)
 1999 (Metro Manila & Region I)
 2002 (South Cotabato) 2003 (Masbate)

Effects of Typhoons Reming and Milenyo in 2006 andTyphoons Ondoy and Pepeng in 2009

•Total Estimated Damage & Losses (Typhoons Ondoy, Pepeng and Santi 2009)- P 206 Billion or USD 4.38 Billion (equivalent to about 2.7% of GDP)g and losses were suffered byy the pprivate sector- More than 90% of the damage- Biggest damage: Housing – P25.5B; Businesses- P22.4B; Transport- P6.5
- Largest Losses: Business- P88.9B; Agriculture- P47.5B; Housing – P8.9B

DISTRIBUTION OF CASUALTIES FOR MANMADE AND
NATURAL EMERGENCIES FOR CY 2007
2007-2009
2009

14000

12000

No.of C
Casualties

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ManmadeNatural2007
DEATHS
113
88
INJURIES
46
1,195
TOTAL
159
1,283

ManmadeNatural
2008
735
453
6,549
12,552
7,284
13,005

Based on PHEMAP:
Natural Emergencies: Tropical Cyclones, Flooding, Landslide, Big Wave, Tornado, Red Tide, Volcanic Activity
Manmade Emergencies: Biological events, Technological events, Societal events

ManmadeNatural
2009
387
1,109
2,376
524
2,763
1,633

Distribution of Events per Region CY 2009250

NUMBERR OF EVENTS
S

200

150

100

50

0

I

II

III

IVA

IVB

V

Natural

12

11

17

117

7

13

Man-made
Man
made

7

8

21

41

7

12

VI

VII

VIII

9

8

8

26

17

9

IX

X

XI

XII

CAR

14

ARM NCR
M
10
11

10

CAR
AGA
8

2

9

13

13

15

15

28

22

19

6

212

Based on PHEMAP:
Natural Emergencies: Tropical Cyclones, Flooding, Landslide, Big Wave, Tornado, Red Tide, Volcanic Activity
Manmade Emergencies: Biological events, Technological events, Societal events

The Philippine
Disaster Risk Reduction andManagementMt FrameworkFkWar Emergency
Mode Civil Defense

Milestones and Trends in DM’70’s – ’80’s’90’s – 2003

2004 – Present

Disaster Preparedness
Disaster Response

Disaster Management

Disaster Risk
Management

 1990 EQ
 Pinatubo Eruption
 RA 7160
 IDNDRg
 1997 Nat’l. DM Trng.
Framework 1998 GAA
 EO 137 dtd Aug. 10, 1999
 ACDM / ARPDM
 ISDRTyphoon “Yoling”
 Birth of OCD
 AEGDM
 PD 1566• REINA /g
GuinsaugonLandslides• ‘Milenyo,
Paeng, Reming,
Seniang’• Guimaras
G
Oil
O
Spill
• ‘Cosme’• ‘Frank’• MV Princess
Piof the Stars
Tragedy• Indian
Ocean EQ &Tsunami• Hurricane‘Katrina’• Cyclone‘‘Nargis’• Sichuan EQ• DRR
Initiatives-AADMERAADMER-HFA-‘READY’
Project

Policyy Environment

2010

2005
1978
8
Presidential
Decree 1566

Hyogo
Framework
for Action

Disaster Risk
R d i andReductiond
2009Management Act
ASEAN Agreement on
2007
Disaster Management
Emergenc
I i i
Institutionalizati
li i and Emergency
Response
on of Cluster
ApproachPhilippine Disaster Management System
 Primarily anchored on Presidential Decree 1566

PD 1566

 Focus is disaster preparedness and response Disasters traditionally viewed as one-off events responded to by

governments and relief agencies

 Social and economic implications and causes of disaster events arecomplex Disasters can reverse hard-won development gains, illustrating therelationships between poverty reduction,
reduction environmental
degradation and vulnerability to disasters

 Engagement of other players is not pronounced
 No strong institutional basis, especially at the LGU level“Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Control
and Capability & Establishing the National
Program on Community Disaster Preparedness”

PD 1566566

 The
h exercise
i off leadershipl d hi responsibilities
ibili i is
i expectedd fromf

the local government executives (Governors, Mayors,
Barangay Captains).
 The main role of national government is to provide

supportt to
t theth localll governmentt units.
it Both pplanning
g and actual operationsp
are to be carried out “…

in an inter-agency, multi-sectoral basis to optimize
the utilization of resources.” Every agency of government is directed to prepare its disaster

preparedness plan.

“Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Control
and Capability & Establishing the NationalP
Programon C
Community
it DisasterDit Preparedness”
Pd”

PD 1566566

 Disaster Management, specifically disaster preparedness andemergency operations is to be pursued with a heavy emphasis
on “self“ lf reliance”,
li” ““self-help”
lf h l ” andd “mutual“t l assistance.”i t”
 Maximum utilization of resources at every politicopolitico

administrative level is enjoined before assistance is soughtfrom higher levels.
 Primary responsibility for Disaster Management is placed uponagencies off theh government.

NATIONAL DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND
MANAGEMENT CENTER. . . the nernerve
e center for alert and monitoring
monitoring,
resource mobilization, response coordinationand information management

. . . the nerve center for alert and monitoring,
resource mobilization, response coordinationand information management
Operates on a 24/7 basis
Manned by OCD personnel roundround-thetheclock, with complementation fromselected NDRRMC member-agencies
such as DSWD,, DOH,, AFP,, DPWH,,
PNRC during emergency situations

Core Functions
•
•
•
•
•

Alert and Monitoring
Multi agency Operational Coordination
Multi-agency
Response Resource Mobilization
Information Management, andProgram Coordination for Operations Capability
UpgradeHyogo Framework for Action Priorities



P



P



P



P

HFA

 D
 D
 D

NDCC’s Disaster Response Strategy:
Cluster Approach
UN Cluster
Cl t ApproachAh was adopted
d t d byb the
th NDCC as a coordination
di ti
t l totoolt ensure amore coherent and effective delivery of humanitarian assistance by mobilizing groupsof agencies, organizations and NGOs to respond in a strategic manner across all key
sectors or areas of activity

Cluster

GoP
Lead

UN-IASC
Lead

Food and Non-Food Items

DSWD

WFP

Camp Management

DSWD

IOM

Sh l and
Shelterd Li
Livelihood
lih d

DSWD

IFRC

WASH, Health, Nutrition, & Psychosocial Services

DOH

UNICEF, WHOgand Emergency
gy Telecommunications
Logistics

OCD

WFP

Education

DepEd

UNICEF

Agriculture

DA

FAO

Early Recovery

OCD

UNDP

ASEAN Agreement on Disaster
Management and Emergency Response

AADMER AADMER was signed
idb
by ASEAN F
Foreigni Mi
Ministers
i
iin J
July
l 2005.
 The Agreement contains provisions on disaster risk reduction, monitoring andearly
l warning,i
prevention
ti andd mitigation,
iti tipreparednessdandd response,
rehabilitation, technical cooperation and research, mechanisms for
coordination and establishment of an ASEAN Coordination Center for
Humanitarian Assistance on disaster management (AHA Center).
Center) AADMER is a regional legally-binding agreement that binds the ASEAN

Member States together to promote regional cooperation and collaboration in
reducing disaster losses and intensifying joint emergency response to disasters
in the region.
 On 14 September 2009, the Philippines was the last of the ten ASEAN Member

States to have ratified the AADMER. The AADMER entered into force on 24
December 2009.
9

Towards Policy Reform: Disaster Risk Reduction &Management Act
 Strengthening the institutional set-up/paradigm
set up/paradigm shift fromreactive to proactive approach to disaster risk management

 Facilitating active engagement, strengthening local capabilities

and competencies, and enhancing resilience through bottomup approach Providing more efficient funding mechanisms
 Pertinent provisions on the declaration of state of calamity,

remedial measures and penalties

 Congruence with universal declarations and principles on

disaster risk reduction and humanitarian assistancePlanningg Instruments
1983
National Calamities andDisaster Preparedness Plan

2003
Local Disaster Coordinating Councils
Councils’
Contingency Plans

2005
Four-Point Plan of Action on Disaster Preparedness

2009
Strategic National Action Plan on Disaster Risk Reduction

Four-Point Plan of Action on Disaster Preparedness
1. Upgrade Forecasting Capability of PAGASA and PHIVOLCS• Improve equipment and staff development• Establish linkages and networking with foreign forecasting institutions covering the
Pacific Rim and South China Sea• Install rainfall and water level gauges

2. Intensify Public Information Campaign on Preparedness• Conduct of Nationwide Synchronized Building Emergency Evacuation Plan (B(B.E.E.P.)
EEP)
Drills, Tsunami and Earthquake Drills• Airing of “Safe Ka Ba?” Disaster Management School-on-Air• Production and distribution of flyers on related hazards

3. Enhance Capabilities for LCEs and their DCCs in identified vulnerable areas• Orient LCES on Disaster Risk Managementgand the Use of LCF• Conduct of Contingency Planning Workshops• Train local responders on MFR, CSSR, and WASAR

4 Strengthen
4.
Stth
Mechanisms
M h i
for
f Government
G
t and
d P
Privatei t SSectort Partnership
P thi"Strengthening Disaster Risk Reduction in the Philippines:
Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) 20092009-2019"
2019

SNAP
S

Priority Programs and Projects
1. Governance: Disaster Risk Management Act
2. Multi-stakeholder
M lti t k h ld Di
Dialogueslon Di
Disastert

Risk Reduction
3. Institutionalization of Disaster Management
Office4. Enhancing Capacity Development for Local
Disaster Coordinating Councils
5. Mainstreaming DRR into the Peace Process
6. Mainstreaming
ii DRR iin Variousi
G
Government
Plans and Programs
7. Public-Private Partnership
8 Resource Mobilization
8.
9. Information and Database Generation"Strengthening Disaster Risk Reduction in the Philippines:
Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) 20092009-2019"
2019

SNAP
S

Priority Programs and Projects
10. Knowledge Management
11. Supporting DRR Mainstreaming

through Sectoral Approach
12. Preparedness for Effective Disaster
Response
13. Information, Education andCommunication (IEC) Campaign
14 Institutional and Technical Capacity
14.
Building
15. Education and Research
16 Forecasting and Early Warning
16.
17. Risk Evaluation
18. Development of Tools for Assessment
anddM
Monitoringit i off DRR M
MeasuresOngoinggg Programsgand Projectsj• Capacity-building
Program (PEER,
Online DRM
Courses andCourses,National WASAR
Trainings)• CBRN Response
Capacity Building• Multi-hazard Mapping• Sectoral Mainstreamingof Disaster Risk
Reduction• Climate Change
Adaptation• Flood Mitigation
Master Plan

Mitigation• Build Back
Better…Build
Back Elsewhere• Bicoli l CARE
CA
Commission• Public
Commission
and Philippine
Disaster
RecoveryFoundation

Preparedness

Rehabilitation• Resource
Mobilization
Systems• Cluster
Approach• UNDAC• Relief web• CERF• AADMER
and SASOP• UN OSLO
Guidelines• APCMADRO• MPAT TE

Response

Program for Enhancement ofEmergency Response

PEER

 The PEER is a regional training program initiated by USAID/OFDA

and managed by National Society for Earthquake (NSET) Purpose: To strengthen and institutionalize capacities in emergency

and disaster response in the five participating Asian countries:
Bangladesh,l d h India,
di Indonesia,di Nepal,
l and
d the
h Philippines.
hili i PEER curriculum includes fours interrelated courses:
Medical First Responder (MFR)
Collapsed Structure Search and Rescue (CSSR)
Hospital Preparedness for Emergencies (HOPE)
Training for Instructor (TFI)

Hazards Mapping and Assessment for
Effective Community-based Disaster
Risk
i k Management Project
j

READY



READY Project is funded by AusAID with technical assistance of UNDP

Funding Support: US$ 1.9 MillionImplementing Partner: Office of Civil DefenseResponsible Partners: PHIVOLCS, PAGASA, MGB, and NAMRIATarget Areas: 27 Provinces

Project Components
1.
Hazards Mapping and Assessment
2. Community-based Disaster Preparedness
3. Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into Local Planning Processes

Status of Implementation: Completed mapping and IEC activities in 11 provinces.
However, a total of 18 provinces were already covered in varying stages of project
execution.

E l ti off Di
Evolution
Disastert M
Managementt
Framework Traditionally,
T ditill disasters
di twere viewed
id as one-off
ff

events and responded to by governments andrelief agencies
 The social and economic implications and causes ofdisaster events were not well appreciated This view engendered a disaster management
framework that was focused on DISASTERRESPONSEDRRM Bill
The Philippine
pp Disaster Risk Reduction and Managementg(DRRM) Act of 2010

Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction andManagementg
Framework and Institutionalizing
g theNational Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan,
Appropriating
pp p
g Funds Therefore and For Other PurposespStrengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction andManagement Framework and Institutionalizing the
National Disaster Risk Reduction and ManagementgPlan,,
Appropriating Funds Therefor and For Other Purposes

DRRM Bill Status:
St tA
Approvedd iin ththe bibicamerall conferencef
on 27 J
January 2010 &ratified by the Philippine Congress on 1 February 2010.

 Salient Features:






Proactive, comprehensive, integrated, community-based, multisector approachpp
in DRM
Respect to people’s rights to life and property; adherence / adoptionof universal norms, principles and standards of humanitarianassistance
Development, promotion and implementation of the National
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan (NDRRMP)
Mainstreaming of DRR and Climate Change Adaptation indevelopment, peace and conflict resolution process

Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction andManagement Framework and Institutionalizing the
National Disaster Risk Reduction and ManagementgPlan,,
Appropriating Funds Therefor and For Other Purposes

DRRM Bill

 Salient Features:

Present DCCs shall be renamed as N/R/L DRRMCs;
BDCCs shall be known as Barangay Disaster Risk
Reductiondandd Management Committee ((BDRRMC)) underdthe Barangay Development Council
 Enhanced OCD functions (i.e. monitoring and evaluation)and organizational structure Establishment of permanent Local Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management Offices
 Local DRRM Fund – not less than 5% of the estimatedrevenue from the regulargsources shall be used to support
pp
DRM activities; 30% of which shall be allocated as Quick
Response Fund

Principles
p of the NDRRMF
 AddressAddththe underlying
d l i causes off vulnerabilitylbilit
 A national responsibility within and towards a sustainable

developmentdlt approachh Need for community empowerment and shared
responsibilities
ibili i Good responsive goverenance Mutually reinforcing partnerships
 Strong and responsive political will, commitment andleadership Best done through local and customized adoption andadaptation

Diagram Explation
 Because the country is challenged by increasing

disaster and climate risks caused by dynamic
combinationsbi i
off naturall anddhhuman‐induced
i d dhazards, exposure, and people’s vulnerabilities
andd capacities…
iti
 There is an urgent need for the country to work
together through multi‐stakeholder partnerships
and robust institutional mechanisms andprocesses so that Filipinos will be able to live insafer, adaptive and disaster resilient communities
on theh pathh to ddevelopinglsustainably.
blThis DRRM framework indicates the paradigm
shift towards a proactive and preventive approachto disaster management.
It emphasizes that resources invested in disasterprevention mitigation
prevention,
mitigation, preparedness and climatechange adaptation will be more effective towards
attaining the goal of adaptive,
adaptive disaster resilient
communities and sustainable development.

The Framework shows that mitigating the potential impacts of
preventingg hazards and small
existingg disaster and climate risks, pemergencies from becoming disasters, and being prepared fordisasters, will substantially reduce loss of life and damage to social,economici andd environmentalil assets
It also highlights the need for effective and coordinatedhumanitarian assistance and disaster response to save lives andprotect the more vulnerable groups during and immediately after adisaster.

Mainstreaming DRR is a means towards( ) refocusing
(a)
f
i th
the d
developmentlt goals,
l objectives
bj ti
and
d targetstt
to be able to adequately respond to disaster risks; and(b) identifying
id tif i andd implementing
i lti appropriatei t iinterventionstti
tto
address the impacts of disaster risks.
Mainstreaming DRR is an important step towards avoidinghhuge
losseslffrom disasters.
diThese processes will synergize efforts and create
rippling positive changes toward addressing theunderlying causes of vulnerabilities andmainstreaming DRRM in national and local
policy‐making,li
ki planning,li iinvestment
programmingpgg and in the policy/planp y/pimplementation.

National Disaster Risk ReductiongCounciland Management(NDRRMC)
DILG
Vice-Chair
Preparedness

DND
Chair

DSWD
Vice-Chair
Response

MEMBERS:

AFP
DOJ

DBM
DOLE

DOE
DTI

NEDA
Vice-Chair
Rehabilitation& Recovery

NEW MEMBERS:

DA

DOH

DOST
Vice-Chair
Prevention &Mitigation

DENR
DepEd

DOT
PNRC

DOTC
OCD

Executive
Secretary

CHED

CCC

DPWH

DFA

HUDCC

GSIS

NCRFW

OPAPP

PHIC

PNP

SSS

LCP

LPP

LMP

LMB

ULAP

NAPCVDC

CSO

Press
Secretary

CSO

PrivateSectorCSO

DRRM Aspectsp PreventionPti andd Miti
Mitigationti Preparedness
 Response Rehabilitation and Recovery

These aspects coincide with the 4 vice chairpersons of the
NDRRMC and represent the key components of disastergrisk reduction and management.
They are not phases and can happen at different stages oreven alongsidel
id eachh other.
th
They mutually reinforce each other

CSO

Prevention and Mitigationg Withh DOST as leadl d
 Through this aspect,
aspect we want to avoid hazards and mitigate theirpotential impacts by reducing vulnerabilities and exposure andenhancing capacities of communities
 Key Result Areas
1.

2.
3
3.
4.

5.

Mainstreamed and integrated DRR & CCA in national, sectoral,
regional and local development, policies, plans and budget.
DRRM/CCA sensitive environmental management.
Increased disaster resiliency of infrastructure systems.
systems
Community based and scientific DRR/CCA assessment, mapping,analysis and monitoring.
Risk transfer mechanisms

Preparednessp With DILG as leadl d
 Through thisthis, we want to establish and strengthen

capacities of communities to anticipate, cope andrecover from the negative impacts of emergency
occurrences & disasters

 Key
y Result Areas
1.
2.

3.
4.

Community Awareness and understanding of the Risk Factors
Contingency Planning at the local level (to include Incident
Command System, Early Warning Systems, Pre‐emptive
Pre emptive
evacuation, stockpiling and equipping)
Local drills and simulation exercises
Nationala o a ddisastersas e response
espo se planningpagResponse With DSWD as lead

Through this, we aim to provide life preservation and meet the basic subsistence needs ofaffected population based on acceptable standards during or immediately after a disaster

Key Result Areas
1.
DANA as a generic activity (NDRRMC DANA methodology was adopted from ADPC)
2.
Relief Operations
3.
Search, Rescue, Retrieval
4.
Dissemination/Information sharing of disaster‐related information
5.
WATSAN and Health6.
Development/provision of temporary shelter
7.
Psycho social support
8.
Early Recovery Mechanism
9.
Management of Dead and Missing
10.
Evacuation Management
11.
Social Protection Intervention
12.
Civil and uniformed services coordination

Rehabilitation and Recoveryy
 WithWi h NEDA as leadl d
 ThroughTh
h thi
this, we aim
i tto restoretandd improveifacilities, livelihood and living conditions andorganizational capacities of affected communities,
and reduced disaster risks in accordance with the“building back better” principle
 Key Result Areas
1.
2.
3.

Livelihood
Shelter
Infrastructure
ast uctu e

RA 10121 states that...
that
The National Disaster Risk Reduction andManagement Framework (NDRRMF) shall be Comprehensive AllAll‐hazards
hazards
 Multi‐ sectoral inter‐agency and Community‐based
Community based approach to DRRM
It will be reviewed every 5 years, or as necessary
to ensure relevance

Challenges
g Ahead Moving from isolated actions and pilot projects tocomprehensive programmes of action…translating the SNAP
into action

 Intensifying disaster risk reduction work at the local level byenhancingg capacitypy developmentpand operationalpreadiness of
local government units Promotion of climate changeg adaptationpand disaster risk

reduction linkages

 Sustaining effective DRR programs and good practices

“ DRR,, povertyp
y alleviation and sustainable
development are inextricably linked”

Th k you…
Thank
Office of Civil Defense, Secretariat of the
National Disaster Risk Reduction andManagement Center
Camp General Emilio Aguinaldo, Quezon City
Visit us @ www.ndcc.gov.ph
Email: dopcen@ndcc.gov.ph
dopcen@ndcc gov ph
SMS: +63 (917) 891-6322
Telephone: +63 (2) 912-2665+63 (2) 912-5668+63 (2) 911-5061 to 64
Telefax: +63 (2) 911
911-1406
1406