RESEARCH REPORTSTUDY ON EARTHQUAKE RISK AND VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT
and LESSONS LEARNED

ANNA-LISA DUMAGUING ORALLO
Office of Civil Defense
PHILIPPINESARDC VISITING RESEARCHER 2011A
July – October 2011

Disclaimer
This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC
member countries.
The views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of
the ADRC. The boundaries and names shown and the designations usedon the maps in the report also do not imply official endorsement or
acceptance by the ADRC.

Table of Content

I.

Foreword

II.

Objective

III. Introduction
A. Republic of the Philippines
B. Japan
IV. The Philippine Disaster Management System
A. Natural Hazards Likely to Affect the Country
B. Recent Major Disasters in the Philippines
C. The Legal Authority
1. The National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC)
2. The Office of Civil Defense (OCD)
3. The NDCC Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Framework
4. National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC)
5. Republic Act 10121
6. The NDRRMC Framework
7. Salient Features
8. NDRRMC Aspects
9. The Council Members
10. Authority of the Chairperson
11. Duties and Responsibilities of the Council Members
V.

The Disaster Management of Japan
A. The Natural Hazards in Japan
B. The Recent Disasters in Japan
C. The Disaster Management
1. Progress in Disaster Management Law and Systems
2. Mission of the Cabinet Office
3. The Central Management Council
4. Duties of the Central Management Council
5. Disaster Management Planninga. Disaster Management Planning System
b. Basic Disaster Management Plan
6. Disaster Management Budget
7. Disaster Response Mechanism

VI. Research Study on Earthquake
A. Pacific Ring of Fire
B. Hazards Posed by Earthquake
1. Ground Shaking
2. Ground Rupture
3. Tsunami
4. Liquefaction
5. Landslide
6. Fire7. Flood
8. Human Impact

VII. Earthquake Around the Earth
A. Japan
1. Study on the Tonankai and Nankai Earthquake
a. National Land Conservationb. Observing, Forecasting and Warning Disaster Risks
c. Information and Communication System
d. Integrated Disaster Management Information Systeme. Development of Disaster Management Bases
f. Issuing of Evacuation Order and Instruction
g. Measures for People Requiring Assistance During Disasterh. Disaster Reduction Drills and Exercises
2. Earthquake Disaster Countermeasuresa. Observation System
1. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)
2. Japan Agency Marine Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)
b. Earthquake Proofing of Houses and Buildingsc. Coastline Projects
3. Tsunami Countermeasures
a. Disaster Awareness Enhancement and Disaster Knowledge Disseminationb. Improvement of Environment for Disaster Management Volunteers Activities
B. Philippines
1. Study of Metro Manila Earthquake
a. Fault in the Philippines
b. Earthquake Generators
2. The Philippine Response Towards Disaster Reduction
3. The Metro Manila Impact Earthquake Reduction Study (MMIERS)
a. Possible Regional Separationb. The Goal
1. Develop National System Resistant to Earthquake Impact
2. Improve Metropolitan Manila’s Urban Structure Resistant to Earthquake
3. Enhance Effective Management System
4. Enhance Community Disaster Management Capacity
5. Formulate Construction System
6. Promote Research Technology Development on Earthquakec. High Priority Action Plan
4. Earthquake Disaster Countermeasures
a. Integration of Disaster Risk Management in Development Programb. READY Projectc. REDAS
d. Installation of Earthquake Intensity Meters
e. The Manila Map Viewer
f. The Metro Manila Development Authority Initiatives
g. PEERh. The Department of Education (DepEd) and Commission on Higher Education(CHED) Initiatives
5. Tsunami Countermeasures
a. PHIVOLCS Program
1. Tidetool
2. Hazard Maps
b. SWEEP School Project
6. NDRRMC Partnership with Private Sectors
VIII. Disaster Preparedness of Metro Manila Municipalities and Cities
IX. Conclusion
X.
References

ForewordObjective of the Research:Enhance legal framework and institutional capacity for disaster risk reduction andmanagement
Strengthen community capacity and knowledge on disaster risk reduction and management

III. General Information:
A. Republic of the Philippines
The Republic of the Philippines (RP) is an archipelagic
nation located in Southeast Asia. Three prominent bodies
of water surround the archipelago: the Pacific Ocean on
the east, the South China Sea on the west and north, andthe Celebes Sea and the coastal waters of Borneo on thesouth. The Philippines constitutes an archipelago of 7,107
islands and has a total land area of approximately 300,000
square kilometers. Large mountainous terrain, narrowcoastal plains and interior valleys and plains make up thecountry’s topography.
The country’s capital is Manila. The population
estimated is 94.01 million as of July 2009 with a growthrate of 1.96%. Ninety percent (90%) of the Filipino
population is Christians. Eighty-three percent (83%) is
predominantly Roman Catholics. It has a democratic formof government.
The country is divided into three major island groups. Luzon is the largest island group with anarea of 141,000 square kilometers, followed by Mindanao covering 102,000 square kilometers,
and the Visayas with 57,000 square kilometers. The rest are small islets that emerge anddisappear with ebbing and rising of tides.
The Philippines has a tropical and maritime climate.
Using temperature and rainfall as bases, its climate can bedivided into two major seasons: (1) the rainy season, from
June to November; and (2) the dry season, from December
to May. The dry season may be subdivided further into (a) the
cool dry season, from December to February; and (b) the hot
dry season, from March to May.
The Philippines is a newly industrialized country, with an
economy anchored on agriculture but with substantial
contributions from manufacturing, mining, remittances from overseas Filipinos, and service
industries such as tourism, and business process outsourcing.

B. JAPAN
Japan is an island nation in East Asia. Located in the Pacific
Ocean, it lies to the east of the Sea of Japan, People's Republic ofChina, North Korea, South Korea and Russia, stretching from the
Sea of Okhotsk in the north to the East China Sea and Taiwan in thesouth. The characters that make up Japan's name mean "sun-origin",which is why Japan is sometimes referred to as the "Land of the
Rising Sun".
A major economic power, Japan has the world's third-largest
economy by nominal GDP and by purchasing power parity. It is also
the world's fourth largest exporter and fourth largest importer. After
Singapore, Japan has the lowest homicide (including attempted
homicide) rate in the world. According to both UN and WHO
estimates, Japan has the longest life expectancy of any country in the world. According to the UN,
it has the third lowest infant mortality rate.
Japan consists of forty-seven prefectures, each overseen by an elected governor, legislature
and administrative bureaucracy. Each prefecture is further divided into cities, towns and villages.
Japan has a total of 6,852 islands extending along the Pacific coast of Asia. The main islands,
from north to south, are Hokkaidō, Honshū, Shikoku and Kyūshū. The Ryūkyū Islands, including
Okinawa, are a chain to the south of Kyūshū. Together they are often known as the JapaneseArchipelago. About 73 percent of Japan is forested, mountainous, and unsuitable for agricultural,industrial, or residential use. As a result, the habitable zones, mainly located in coastal areas,
have extremely high population densities. Japan is one of the most densely populated countries
in the world.
The islands of Japan are located in a volcanic zone on the
Pacific Ring of Fire. They are primarily the result of large oceanic
movements occurring over hundreds of millions of years from themid-Silurian to the Pleistocene as a result of the subduction of thePhilippine Sea Plate beneath the continental Amurian Plate andOkinawa Plate to the south, and subduction of the Pacific Plate
under the Okhotsk Plate to the north. Japan was originallyattached to the eastern coast of the Eurasian continent. The
subducting plates pulled Japan eastward, opening the Sea ofJapan around 15 million years ago. Japan has 108 active
volcanoes. Destructive earthquakes, often resulting in tsunami,
occur several times each century. The 1923 Tokyo earthquake
killed over 140,000 people. More recent major quakes are the1995 Great Hanshin earthquake and the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake, a 9.0-magnitude quake which
hit Japan on March 11, 2011, and triggered a large tsunami.
A major feature of Japan’s climate is the clear-cut
temperature changes between the four seasons. In spite of its
rather small area, the climate differs in regions from a subarctic
climate to a subtropical climate. The side of the country whichfaces the Sea of Japan has a climate with much snow in winterby seasonal winds from the Siberia. Most of the areas havedamp rainy season from May to July by seasonal winds fromthe Pacific Ocean. Japan is frequently visited by typhoons from
July to September.

IV. The Philippine Disaster Management System
A.

Natural Hazards Likely to Affect the Country

The Philippines is susceptible to various types of natural hazards due to its geographicallocation and physical environment; being situated in the “Pacific Ring of Fire”, between two
Tectonic plates (Eurasian and Pacific), an area encircling the Pacific Ocean where frequent
earthquakes and volcanic activity result from the movements of said tectonic plates. In fact, thecountry experiences an average of 20 earthquakes per day (most are too weak to be felt). There
are also about 300 volcanoes, of which 22 are active and have been recorded in history to have
erupted; while 5 are considered to be the most active namely: Taal, Mayon, Bulusan, Kanlaonand Hibok-Hibok. Also, being located along the typhoon belt/superhighway in the Pacific makes
it vulnerable to extreme weather events. An average of 20-30 typhoons/tropical cyclones visit thecountry every year, with 5-7 of them considered the most destructive. Its 36,289 kms. ofcoastline is also vulnerable to tsunami, making the country also highly-susceptible to sea level
rise and storm surges. Accompanying or resulting from these tropical cyclone events aresecondary phenomena such as landslides, floods/flashfloods/flooding, tornadoes, drought, andheavy/monsoon rains.
Over the past decades, the Philippines have been labeled as one of the most disaster-prone
countries in the world mainly because of its geographic and geologic location and physicalcharacteristics. The 1,200-km-long Philippine fault zone (PFZ) is a major tectonic feature thattransects the whole Philippine archipelago from northwestern Luzon to southeastern Mindanao.
This arc-parallel, left-lateral strike slip fault is divided into several segments and has been thesource of large-magnitude earthquakes in recent years, such as the 1973 Ragay Gulf
earthquake (M 7.0), 1990 Luzon earthquake (Mw 7.7) and 2003 Masbate earthquake (Ms 6.2).
Disaster preparedness including disaster risk reduction has been strengthened in our country
especially through the passage of Disaster Risk Reduction Management Act of 2010 (Republic
Act (RA) 10121) and with its implementing Rules and Regulations supported by the Climate
Change Act of 2009 (RA 9729). Efforts to familiarize the coordination mechanism to different
parts of the country have been stepped up to contribute to local disaster preparedness.
B.

Major Disasters in the Philippines

1.

Typhoon Ketsana (“Ondoy”) (26 September 2009)

On 26 September 2009, Typhoon
Ketsana (locally named “Ondoy”), the 15th
tropical cyclone to enter the Philippine Area of
Responsibility (PAR), battered Central Luzon
causing the worst flooding in the Philippines,
with floodwaters reaching up to a height of 6
meters in 40 years. According to the local
weather bureau, the amount of heavy rainfall
itbrought in only 6 hours which was 341 mm.
was recorded as the highest since 1947, evensurpassing the 334 mm. recorded highest
24-hour rainfall 42 years ago. It was also
almost equal to the average monthly rainfall in Metro Manila, which was pegged at 392 mm.
Towns east of Manila were submerged, with landslides in other parts of Luzon. Excessive
flooding was experienced particularly in cities in the National Capital Region and in the provincesin Calabarzon areas, which were also heavily-affected by the wrath of Ketsana. Most number ofdeaths was due to drowning and the water-borne infectious disease called Leptospirosis.

Casualties:
 464 dead
 529 injured
 37 missing
Affected population/areas: 997,983 families / 4,929,382 persons in Regions I, II, III, IV-A, IV-B, V,
VI, IX, XII, NCR, ARMM, and CAR
Estimated cost of damage to properties (infrastructure and agriculture): PhP11.106 Billion(US$236.3M)
Damaged houses:

6,253 totally destroyed 130,736 partially damaged
2. 1994 Mindoro Earthquake and Tsunami
Residents of Mindoro island are still haunted by memories of the tsunami that claimed 78
lives, many of them children, on November 15, 1994. At 3:15 a.m. on that day, a magnitude 7.1
earthquake jolted them awake, triggered by the movement of a previously unacknowledged
active Aglubang River Fault. People living in villages along the 40-kilometer northern shore of
the island, from Puerto Galera to Pinamalayan, first heard a gush of water less than five minutes
after the earthquake.
According to the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (Phivolcs), the areas
hardest hit by the tsunami were Barangays Malaylay, Old Baco, Wawa and Baco islands, where
waves at least six meters high smashed into the shore, destroying 1,530 houses. The tsunami
left 41 people dead by drowning, most of them elderly or children below 10 years old.
The event affected 22,452 families in 13 out of 15 municipalities - a total of 273 barangays in Oriental Mindoro, with 78 confirmed dead and 430 more injured.
The combined effects of the earthquake and the tsunami totally destroyed 1,530 houses andpartially damaged 6,036 more. Most of the houses that were totally destroyed were in themunicipalities of Calapan and Baco, while most partially damaged houses were in Naujan andGloria. Officials placed the cost of rehabilitating 24 bridges and 500 kilometers of roads at
PhP5.15 Million.
The tsunami knocked down trees and inundated coastal areas as far as 250 meters inland,scoured much of the shallow sandy foreshore of Malaylay island to Wawa and formed a "beachridge" about a kilometer long along the coast of Wawa, Old Baco and Malaylay.
Luckily, the disaster response machinery of Mindoro province was in place and under theleadership of Governor Rodolfo G. Valencia, response and recovery were prompt, minimizing thetoll and losses. National government bodies like the National Disaster Coordinating Council(NDCC), Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) and others, led by former
President Fidel V. Ramos himself, were also quick and efficient in extending assistance to theaffected local government units.
The 1994 Mindoro earthquake reiterated the lessons highlighted by the 1990 Northern
Luzon event and provided another opportunity to deepen our understanding of theprocesses/phenomena generated or triggered by shallow seated and high magnitude
earthquakes. Moreover, it underscored the reality of tsunami and the impossibility of issuing
timely warning for tsunami of local origin. The time interval between the earthquake and thetsunami hit is too short (2-5 minutes in the case of the Mindoro event) for any meaningful warning
system. Other options must therefore be considered to reduce tsunami disaster in the future.

One option is to adopt and enforce policies regulating settlements in the areas exposed totsunami, another is to install mitigation structures, but these must be weighed against the factthat tsunami-generating events are rare and far-between. A less costly alternative is to conduct
education and information campaigns to make the concerned inhabitants aware of the hazard,
take any strong earthquake as a natural warning for tsunami and immediately flee towardpre-identified places of safety whenever they experience extremely strong ground shaking.
The Geologic Hazards Information and Education Alliance (GHIEA) was organized andlaunched in May 1994, it is an alliance of media and science/hazard-oriented government andnon-government organizations which aims to promote awareness of and preparedness forgeologic hazards. The alliance focus its information and education campaigns on tsunami
hazard nationwide.
3.

1990 Luzon earthquake

The Luzon earthquake occurred on Monday,
July 16, 1990, at 4:26 PM (local time in thePhilippines). The densely populated island of Luzon
was struck by an earthquake with a 7.8 Ms(surface-wave
magnitude). The
earthquake
produced a 125 km-long ground rupture thatstretched from Dingalan, Aurora to Cuyapo, Nueva
Ecija as a result of strike-slip movements along thePhilippine Fault and the Digdig Fault within thePhilippine Fault System. The earthquake epicenter
was placed at 15° 42' N and 121° 7' E near the town of Rizal, Nueva Ecija, northeast of
Cabanatuan City.
An estimated 1,621 people were killed in the earthquake, most of the fatalities located inCentral Luzon and the Cordillera region.
The earthquake caused damage within in an area of about 20,000 square kilometers,
stretching from the mountains of the Cordillera Administrative Region and through the Central
Luzon region. The earthquake was strongly felt in Metropolitan Manila, Destroying many buildings
and leading to panic and stampedes and ultimately threedeaths in the National Capital Region.
The popular tourist destination of Baguio City, wasamong the areas hardest hit by the Luzon earthquake.
The earthquake caused 28 collapsed buildings, including
hotels, factories, government and university buildings, aswell as many private homes and establishments.
In Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, the tallest buildingin the city, a six-story concrete school building housing
the Christian College of the Philippines, collapsed during
the earthquake, which occurred during school hours.
Around 154 people were killed at the CCP building.
In Dagupan City, Pangasinan, about 90 buildings in
the city were damaged, and about 20 collapsed. Somestructures sustained damage because liquefaction
caused buildings to sink as much as 1 meter (39 inches).
The earthquake caused a decrease in the elevation of thecity and several areas were flooded. The city suffered 64 casualties of which 47 survived and 17
died. Most injuries were sustained during stampedes at a university building and a theater.
Five municipalities in La Union were also affected: Agoo, Aringay, Caba, Santo Tomas, andTubao with a combined population of 132,208. Many buildings collapsed or were severely
damaged. 100,000 families were displaced when two coastal villages sank due to liquefaction.
The province suffered many casualties and 32 of them died.
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) immediately initiatedrehabilitation efforts after the July 16 earthquake. Livelihood programs for the victims and therehabilitation of damaged watersheds were implemented. These, as well as the efforts of othergovernment agencies and non- governmental organizations, however, are mostly of a curative
nature and are not enough. There must be preventive approaches developed, if not against
earthquakes (which we cannot prevent), at least in terms of early warning, land use planning,
improved building codes, and the like. Former President Aquino thus signed on August 6, 1990
the Memorandum Order creating the "Inter-Agency Committee on Documenting and Establishing
Database on the July 1990 Luzon Earthquake".
This Inter-Agency Committee chaired by DENR and the Department of Science andTechnology (DOST) was tasked to undertake a unified, systematic and scientific documentationof information on earthquakes, particularly the July 16 killer quake for future planning andresearch.
The Philippine government, through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources(DENR) and the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) is undertaking steps to mitigate
the effects of future major earthquake not only in areas affected but also in other developed andliquefaction prone areas in the country.
Lessons Learned







It is apparent that any effective natural disaster mitigation program should be built aroundthe community. Public awareness on disaster management is very much needed
The Local Disaster Coordinating Councils, during that time, were incapable of promptly
responding to the situation. The local disaster management officials acknowledged their lackof preparedness plans, resources and authority to deal with a major earthquake. However,the local organizations were not totally incapacitated. After recovering from the initialshock, they moved, though not always as DCCs but as individual DCC member organization.
Majority of the local DCCs were able to mobilize 34 days after the event.
Reconstruction and strengthening measures have been reviewed and observed on a rangeof projects. Contact with local consultants and government engineers has provided further
insights into the effects of the earthquake and the key issues faced in the design andconstruction of seismic resistant buildings and infrastructure.
Organizational experiences in the 1990 disaster underscored several issues which need tobe resolved to prepare the country for similar occurrences in the future:1) the mostappropriate and effective organizational framework for disaster response; 2) division ofdisaster management responsibilities among: the various levels of organization -- national,
regional, provincial, municipal, barangay, and household; and 3) the role of NGOs in
disaster management.

Data on Natural Disasters

Data on Major Earthquake Occurrences in the Philippines

C.

Legal Authority

1.

The National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC)

Leading the collaborative efforts in disaster preparedness planning and mitigation, as well
as disaster response operations and rehabilitation both in the government and private sector is
the National Disaster Coordinating Council (NDCC). The NDCC is the highest policy-making,coordinating and supervising body at the national level for disaster risk management in the
country chaired by the Secretary of National Defense with the Office of Civil Defense (OCD),
and has the heads of seventeen (17) other departments and agencies as members.
The NDCC is also responsible for advising the President of the Republic of the Philippines
on the status of the national disaster preparedness programs and management plans, disaster
operations, and rehabilitation efforts of all stakeholders; and it also recommends to thePresident the declaration of the state of calamity and the release of the national calamity fundas needed. NDCC’s legal authority is Presidential Decree (PD) 1566 issued on 11 June 1978,
entitled, “Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Control Capability and Establishing the
National Program on Community Disaster Preparedness”.
2. The Office of Civil Defense (OCD)
One of the five (5) bureaus of the Department of National Defense (DND) (per PD No. 1 as
implemented by Letter of Intent (LOI) No. 19, s-1972, and DND Order Nos. 737 and 737-A,
s-1973), the Office of Civil Defense (OCD), officially established on 1 July 1973, serves as theexecutive arm and secretariat of the National Disaster Coordinating Council per PD 1566.
As the nerve center for alert and monitoring, resource mobilization, response coordination,and information management, it has the primary task of coordinating the activities andfunctions of various government agencies and instrumentalities, private institutions and civicorganizations for the protection and preservation of life and property during emergencies. It
has in its vision a service-oriented organization, prepared population and a safe nation. Its
mission is to basically administer a comprehensive national civil defense and civil assistanceprogram by providing leadership in the continuous development of measures to reduce risk tocommunities and manage the consequence of disasters.
Presently, OCD is maintaining 17 fully-operational regional centers which provide secretariat
services and serve as executive arm to 17 regional disaster coordinating councils.
OCD and its Regional Centers operate on a 24/7 basis, manned by OCD personnel
round-the-clock, with complementation from selected NDCC member-agencies, such as, theDepartment of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), Department of Health (DOH), Armed
Forces of the Philippines (AFP), Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH),
Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC), among others, during emergency situations.

The National Disaster Management Center
The OCD-NDCC Operations Center(Camp General Emilio Aguinaldo, Quezon City, Philippines)

3.

The NDCC Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Framework
Paradigm Shift
Since the OCD and NDCC’s creation, PD 1566 has been the basic law that guides thedisaster management programs, projects and strategies implementation in the country.
However, it has been observed and noted from past experiences, combined with lessons
learned and gaps examination, that the law that creates the Council is more leaning and gives
more emphasis on response action, thus, making the implementers reactive to possible
disasters rather than taking a proactive stance in disaster risk management.

In early 2005, the OCD-NDCC took a bold step in embracing a paradigm shift of disastermanagement approaches and strategies from reactive to proactive (from disaster response
and preparedness to disaster risk reduction/management (DRR/M). To pursue the DRM
Framework, the Government of the Republic of the Philippines, through the NDCC, adopts thefollowing approaches and strategies:








4.

Multi-hazards approach, which includes both natural and human-induced hazards
Comprehensive, as it encompasses the four (4) phases of DRM, i.e.
mitigation/prevention and preparedness in the pre-disaster phase, and response andrehabilitation/recovery in the post-disaster phase
Inter-agency/multi-sectoral, multi-stakeholder action and cooperation is needed
especially for major disaster events
Community-based, as the nation strongly pushes that the community is the first line ofdefense in any emergency situation
Adheres to nationally and internationally-accepted principles/agreements on disastermanagement and emergency response (e.g. International Humanitarian Assistance
Network (IHAN), ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency
Response (AADMER), Oslo Guidelines, UNGPID, etc.)
Pre-arranged protocols for damage assessment, SAR, emergency relief, early
warning thru forging of Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs) with government andnon-government organizations

The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC)

Disaster management in the Philippines has started from a purely disaster response
approach by focusing on the provision of assistance or intervention during or immediately after adisaster. Within the same perspective, geophysical approaches prevailed that relied on
physical and engineering means such as dams, levees, channel improvements and river training.
This has been the practice till the 20th century.
On the other hand, scientific studies have started which focused on prediction and modelingof natural hazards such as earthquakes and floods. Such continued to flourish. With scienceand technology applied to reduce the impact of hazard on human, this has gradually changedsome views and perspectives in addressing disasters. Around the same period, international
disaster agencies channeled lots of their resources on humanitarian assistance, disaster aid, andrelief operations. The way of thinking about solutions was that, it is within the domain of public
policy applications of essentially geophysical and engineering knowledge.
In such development process, disaster perspective has shifted from reactive to moreproactive framework. The humanitarian, relief and response approach in which the intervention
was provided only during or immediately after a disaster has gradually shifted to a developmental
approach. Within the developmental approach, disasters are seen in a growing manner as adevelopment concern and may arise as a result of unsustainable development practices.
The previously technical approach using engineering and technological solutions including
prediction and modeling of natural hazards and modifying hazards were transformed into
promoting non-structural and non-engineering measures such as community-based disaster
preparedness and early warning, indigenous knowledge, and land use planning, whichemphasize the need to modify vulnerabilities (and capacities) instead of hazards.
The practice of single hazard approach in the past has switched to multi or all-hazards
approach. The sectoral focus has become inter-sectoral, inter-agency, and an all-government
effort. And the public sector led management of disaster became an all-society approach whichis participatory, inclusive, transparent, and gender fair.
Such paradigm shift gave equal emphasis to vulnerabilities and capacities aside fromhazard. It provided opportunities for land use planning to be promoted as a tool for disaster risk
reduction. The shift in focus from hazards to vulnerabilities had emphasized the varying
exposure of population groups living in the city, the poorly constructed buildings, the informal
settlements, incorrectly sited developments, and the inadequacy of open spaces, among others,
as well as capacities of people and institutions to cope with and adapt to natural hazards.
This paradigm shift likewise involved the promotion of non-structural and non-engineering
measures such as community-based disaster preparedness and early warning, the use ofindigenous knowledge, and land use planning, therefore, encouraging the application of land use
policies and land use planning in disaster risk management.
5.

Republic Act (RA) 10121“An Act Strengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Management
System Providing for the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Framework
and Institutionalizing the National DRR and Management Plan, Appropriating Funds
Therefore and for Other Purposes” or “Philippine DRR and Management Act of 2010” –passed into Law on May 27, 2010 (Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of RA 10121
approved on September 27, 2010)
6.

The NDRRMC Framework

The framework envisions “safer, adaptive and disaster resilient Filipino communities towardsustainable development.”
Background
Under the previous approach espoused by the old law (i.e., PD 1566 series of 1978),disaster management centered only on the hazard and the impacts of a disaster. It is assumed
that disasters cannot be avoided. Most of the plans were on the provision of relief goods andinfrastructures like dikes and flood control systems. The government’s response to disaster was
focused on disaster response. The national and local governments were reactive to disasters.
Recognizing this flawed policy/approach which is detrimental in achieving sustainable
development, the Philippine Government approved on 27 May 2010 Republic Act No. 10121 or
the DRRM Act of 2010. Said law mandated the development of the National DRRM Framework
upon which the National DRRM Plan shall be based.
With the ever increasing risk of the Filipino community to disasters, the development of a
National DRRM Framework which promotes a responsive and proactive manner of addressing
disasters is imperative. Recent studies show that on the average, annual direct damages ofdisasters cause as much as PhP 15 Billion and that typhoons alone affect our Gross Domestic
Product by 0.5% annually. Undeniably, disasters set back development programming bydestroying years of development initiatives.
The Framework aims to raise awareness and understanding on the Philippines’ DRRM goal.
It shows the country’s overall direction and set of priorities on DRRM. It has integrated Disaster
Risk Reduction (DRR) and Disaster Risk Management (DRM) to attain sustainable
development through mainstreaming DRR and DRM in our national and local development plans.
It seeks to lessen vulnerabilities and increase the capacities of the government and allcommunities. Furthermore, it promotes multistakeholder partnerships on DRRM

projects/activities.
The National DRRM Framework seeks to initiate the following paradigm shifts:
FROM
TO
Top-down
andcentralized
Disaster Bottom-up and participatory Disaster Risk
Management
Reduction
Disasters are merely a function of physical Disaster mainly a reflection of people’s
hazardvulnerability
Focus on disaster response and anticipation Integrated approach to genuine social andhuman development to reduce disaster risk
Reactive to disaster
Pro-active in disaster risk reduction andmanagement
7.

Salient Features
 Strengthening the institutional set up/paradigm shift from reactive to proactive approachto disaster risk management
 Upholding people’s rights to life and property and adherence to internationally accepted
principles, norms and standards for capacity building in DRRM and humanitarianassistance Adoption of a holistic, comprehensive, integrated , proactive and multi-sector approach inaddressing the impacts of disasters, including climate change Development, promotion and implementation of a comprehensive National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Plan (NDRRMP)
 Mainstreaming DRR and Climate Change in national and local development plans anddevelopment processes (e.g. policy formulation, socio-economic development planning,budgeting and governance

It is coherent with international commitments of the Philippines such as the following: Millennium Development Goals (MDG)
 ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER)
 Hyogo Framework of Action (HFA)
It is consistent with and supports current national laws and policies such as the following: The Philippine Agenda 21 of 1996
 Republic Act No. 9729 or the Climate Change Act of 2009
It is geared towards the achievement of sustainable development
It captures both the concept of Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Disaster Risk
Management (DRM)

The NDRRMC Framework

The country is challenged by increasing disaster and climate risks caused by dynamic
combinations of natural and human-induced hazards, exposure, and people’s vulnerabilities andcapacities. There is an urgent need for the country to work together through multi-stakeholder
partnerships and robust institutional mechanisms and processes so that Filipinos will be able tolive in safer, adaptive and disaster resilient communities on the path to developing sustainably.
This DRRM framework indicates the paradigm shift towards a proactive and preventive
approach to disaster management. This conceptual representation emphasizes that resources
invested in disaster prevention, mitigation, preparedness and climate change adaptation will be
more effective towards attaining the goal of adaptive, disaster resilient communities andsustainable development. The Framework shows that mitigating the potential impacts of existingdisaster and climate risks, preventing hazards and small emergencies from becoming disasters,
and being prepared for disasters, will substantially reduce loss of life and damage to social,economic and environmental assets. It also highlights the need for effective and coordinatedhumanitarian assistance and disaster response to save lives and protect the more vulnerable
groups during and immediately after a disaster. Further, building back better after a disaster willlead to sustainable development after the recovery and reconstruction process.
The upward motion indicated by the spiraling arrows represents a bottom-up participatory
process, enhanced level of awareness, strengthened multi-stakeholder partnerships, and poolingof resources. These positive changes will be realized through the mainstreaming of DRR and
CCA into national and local plans which help us refocus our development goals, objectives andtargets to be able to adequately respond to as well as identify and implement appropriate
interventions to address the impacts of disaster risks.
Mainstreaming DRR is a means towards (a) refocusing the development goals, objectives
and targets to be able to adequately respond to disaster risks; and (b) identifying andimplementing appropriate interventions to address the impacts of disaster risks. Mainstreaming
DRR is an important step towards avoiding huge losses from disasters. Resources invested inrisk reduction are justified because these could prevent or at least minimize enormous costs ofpost-disaster recovery, repair and reconstruction works.
In the end, these processes will synergize efforts and create rippling positive changes
toward addressing the underlying causes of vulnerabilities and mainstreaming DRRM in national
and local policy-making, planning, investment programming and in thepolicy/plan implementation.
8.

The Framework’s Expected Outcome, Key Result Areas andStrategies

AspectPreparedness

Expected Outcome
Established and strengthened
capacities of communities toanticipate, cope and recoverfrom the negative impacts ofemergency occurrences &disasters

Key Result Areas
1. Community Awareness andunderstanding of the Risk
Factors
2. Contingency Planning at
the local level (to include
Incident Command System,
Early Warning Systems,
Pre-emptive evacuation,
stockpiling and equipping)
3. Local drills and simulation
exercises
4. National disaster response
planning

Response

Provided life preservation andmet the basic subsistenceneeds of affected population
based on acceptable
standards during or
immediately after a disaster

Rehabilitation and Recovery

Restored and improved
facilities, livelihood and living
conditions and organizational
capacities of affected
communities, and reduced
disaster risks in accordancewith the “building back better”
principle
Avoided hazards andmitigated their potential
impacts by reducing
vulnerabilities and exposureand enhancing capacities ofcommunities

Disaster Prevention and
Mitigation

1. DANA as a generic activity(NDRRMC DANA
methodology was adopted
from ADPC)
2. Relief Operations
3. Search, Rescue, Retrieval
4. Dissemination/Information
sharing of disaster-related
information
5. WATSAN and Health
6. Development/provision of
temporary shelter
7. Psycho social support
8. Early Recovery Mechanism
9. Management of Dead andMissing
10. Evacuation Management
11. Social Protection
Intervention
12. Civil and uniformed
services coordination
1. Livelihood (1st priority)
2. Shelter (2nd priority)
3. Infrastructure (3rd priority)

1. Mainstreamed andintegrated DRR & CCA innational, sectoral, regional
and local development,
policies, plans and budget.
2. DRRM/CCA sensitiveenvironmental management.
3. Increased disaster
resiliency of infrastructure
systems.
4. Community based andscientific DRR/CCA
assessment, mapping,analysis and monitoring.
5. Risk transfer mechanisms

Strategies
The National DRRM Framework employs the following strategies in achieving the Framework’s
vision, expected outcome and key result areas:
1. Advocacy and Information, Education and Communication (IEC)
2. Competency-based capability building
3. Contingency Planning
4. Education on DRRM and CCA for ALL
5. Institutionalization of DRRMCs and LDRRMOs
6. Mainstreaming of DRR in ALL plans
7. Research, Technology Development and Knowledge Management

8. Monitoring, evaluation and learning
9. Networking and partnership building between and among stakeholders, media and tiers ofgovernment
9. The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC)






Secretary, DND as Chairperson
Four (4) Vice-Chairpersons: DILG – Disaster Preparedness
 DSWD – Disaster Response DOST – Disaster Prevention and Mitigation
NEDA – Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery Executive Director
OCD Administrator with the rank of Undersecretary

The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council

Members:

Thirty-Nine (39) Fourteen (14) line departments
Department of Health (DOH)
Department of Agriculture (DA)
Department of Education (DepEd)
Department of Energy (DOE)
Department of Finance (DOF)
Department of Trade (DOT)
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
Department of Budget and Management (DBM)
Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE)
Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
Department of Transportation and Communication (DOTC) Twelve (12) other government agencies / offices
Office of the Executive Secretary
Office of the Press Secretary
Philippine National Police (PNP)
Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
Climate Change Commission (CCC)
PHILHEALTH
Office of Civil Defense (OCD)
Housing and Urban Development (HUDCC)
Commission on Higher Education (CHED)
Office of the Presidential Adviser on Peace Process (OPAPP)
National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women (NCRFW)National Anti Poverty Commission – Victims of Disaster and Calamities (NAPC-VDC)
 Two (2) Government Financial Institutions
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS)
Social Security System (SSS) One quasi-government agency - Philippine Red Cross (PRC) Five (5) Local Government Units (LGU) Leagues
Union of Local Authorities of the Philippines (ULAP)
League of Province of the Philippines (LPP)
League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP)
League of Municipalities of the Philippines (LMP), andLiga ng mga Barangay (LnB) Four (4) Civil Society Organizations
 One (1) Private Sector Organization
10. Authority of the Chairperson -The Chairperson of the NDRRMC may call upon other
instrumentalities or entities of the government and non-government, civic and privateorganizations for assistance in terms of the use of their facilities and resources for theprotection and preservation of life and properties in the whole range of disaster risk
reduction and management.
11. Duties and Responsibilities of the National Council members

The Chairperson, assisted by the four (4) Vice-chairpersons, shall provide the overall
direction, exercise supervision and effect coordination of relevant DRRM programs,
projects and activities consistent with respective National Council Member Departments
or Agency mandates.
Every member agency shall be assigned functions relevant to their mandates, programs,
geographic jurisdiction and special constituencies to be indicated in the NDRRMP. Eachagency shall formulate its own DRRM Implementing Plan and their manual of operations.

Every member agency of the NDRRMC shall establish their respective Emergency
Operations Center (EOC), subject to exemptions granted by the National
OFFICE OF CIVIL DEFENSEThe Office of Civil Defense (OCD), as the implementing arm of the National Council, shallhave the primary mission of administering a comprehensive national civil defense anddisaster risk reduction and management program by providing leadership in the continuous
development of strategic and systematic approaches as well as measures to reduce thevulnerabilities and risks to hazards and manage the consequences of disasters.
The Administrator – The Administrator of OCD shall also serve as Executive Director of the
National Council and as such, shall have the same duties and privileges of a department
undersecretary. The Administrator shall be a universally acknowledged expert in the field of
disaster risk reduction management and of proven honesty and integrity.
Powers and Functions – The OCD shall have the following powers and functions in partnershipand coordination with member agencies and in consultation with key stakeholders, as may be
applicable.
(a) Advise the National Council on matters relating to disaster risk reduction andmanagement consistent with the policies and scope as defined in this Act and Rules;(b) Formulate and implement the NDRRMP within six (6) months from the effectivity of

(c)
(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)
(k)

(l)
(m)

(n)
(o)

(p)

(q)

these rules and provide leadership in the implementation of the plan. It shall ensurethat the physical framework, social, economic and environmental plans ofcommunities, cities, municipalities and provinces are consistent with such Plan. The
Strategic National Action Plan (SNAP) for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) adopted
through Executive Order No. 888 shall be used as the strategic foundation andbuilding block for the NDRRMP. The National Council shall approve the NDRRMP.
Identify, assess and prioritize hazards and risks in consultation with key
stakeholders;Develop and ensure the implementation of national standards and standard
operating procedures (SOP) in carrying out disaster risk reduction programs
including preparedness, mitigation, prevention, response and rehabilitation works,
from data collection and analysis, planning, implementation, monitoring andevaluation. These national standards and SPOs shall be developed alongside the
NDRRMP.
Review and evaluate the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plans(LDRRMPs) in coordination with concerned line agencies or instrumentalities tofacilitate the integration of disaster risk reduction measures into the local
Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) and Comprehensive Land Use Plan
(CLUP);
Ensure that the LGUs, through the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
Offices (LDRRMOs) are properly informed and adhere to the national standards andprograms;
Formulate standard operating procedures for the deployment of rapid damage
assessment and Analysis (DANA) teams, information sharing among different
government agencies, and coordination before and after disasters at all levels;
Establish an incident command system (ICS) as part of the country’s existingon-scene disaster response system, to ensure effective consequence managementof disasters or emergencies.
Establish standard operating procedures on the communication system amongprovincial, city, municipal, and barangay disaster risk reduction and management
councils, for purposes of warning and alerting them and for gathering information on
disaster areas before, during and after disasters;
Establish Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Training Institutes in suchsuitable location as may be deemed appropriate, in accordance of with rule 8 herein
Ensure that all disaster risk reduction programs, projects and activities requiring
regional and international support shall be in accordance with duly establishednational policies and aligned with international agreements;
Ensure that government agencies and LGUs give top priority and take adequate andappropriate measures in disaster risk reduction and management ;Create an enabling environment for substantial and sustainable participation of
CSOs, private groups, volunteers and communities, and recognize theircontributions in the government’s disaster risk reduction efforts;
Conduct early recovery and post-disaster needs assessment institutionalizing
gender analysis as part of it;
Establish an operating facility to be known as the “National Disaster Risk Reduction
and Management Operations Center (NDRRMOC)” that shall be operated andstaffed on a twenty-four (24) hour basis;
Prepare the criteria and procedure for the enlistment of accredited community
disaster volunteers (ACDVs). It shall include a manual of operations for thevolunteers which shall be developed by the OCD in consultation with various
stakeholders;
Provide advice and technical assistance and assist in mobilizing necessary
resources to increase the overall capacity of LGUs, specifically the low income andin high-risk areas;

(r)
(s)
(t)

V.

Create the necessary offices to perform its mandate as provided under this Act; andPerform secretariat functions of the National Council; andPerform such other functions as may be necessary for effective operation andimplementation of this Act.

Disaster Management in Japan

A. Natural Hazards in Japan
Japan is located in the circum-Pacific mobile zone where seismic and volcanic activities
occur constantly. The number of earthquakes and distribution of active volcanoes is quite high.
The geological formation with plate boundaries of the Pacific plate, the Philippine Sea plate, theEurasian plate, and the North American plate make Japan an earthquake-prone country. Also
because of its geographical, topographical, and meteorological conditions, it is subject to otherfrequent natural disasters such as typhoons, torrential rains, and heavy snow.

Every year there is a great loss of people’s lives and properties in Japan due to natural
disasters. Numerous large-scale typhoons and earthquakes caused extensive damage andthousands of casualties in the past. However, with the progress of society’s capabilities toaddress disasters and the mitigation of vulnerabilities to disasters by developing disastermanagement systems, promoting national land conservation, improving weather forecasting
technologies, and upgrading disaster information communications systems, disaster damage
has shown remarkable declining tendency.
The disaster management system has been developed and strengthened following the bitter
experiences of large-scale natural disasters and accidents.
B.

Recent Major Disasters in Japan

1.

Great East Japan Earthquake/ Tsunami (March 2011)

The 2011 earthquake off the Pacific coastof Tohoku, also known as the 2011 Tōhoku
earthquake or the Great East Japan Earthquake,
was a magnitude 9.0 (Mw) undersea megathrustearthquake off the coast of Japan that occurred at
14:46 JST (05:46 UTC) on Friday, 11 March 2011,
with the epicenter approximately 70 kilometers(43 mi) east of the Oshika Peninsula of Tōhoku andthe hypocenter at an underwater depth ofapproximately 32 km (20 mi). It was the mostpowerful known earthquake ever to have hit Japan,
and one of the five most powerful earthquakes in
the world overall since modern record-keeping began in 1900. The earthquake triggered
powerful tsunami waves, which reached heights of up to 40.5 meters (133 ft) in Miyako in
Tōhoku's Iwate Prefecture, and which in the Sendai area travelled up to 10 km (6 mi) inland. In
addition to loss of life and destruction of infrastructure, the tsunami caused a number of nuclear
accidents, primarily the ongoing level 7 meltdowns at three reactors in the Fukushima I Nuclear
Power Plant complex, and the associated evacuation zones affecting hundreds of thousands ofresidents.
The Japanese National Police Agency has confirmed 24,000 people as dead or missing as ofApril 2011 across eighteen prefectures, as well as over 125,000 buildings damaged or destroyed.
The earthquake and tsunami caused extensive and severe structural damage in Japan, including

heavy damage to roads and railways as well as fires in many areas, and a dam collapse. Around
4.4 million households in northeastern Japan were left without electricity and 1.5 million withoutwater. Many electrical generators were taken down, and at least three nuclear reactors sufferedexplosions due to hydrogen gas that had built up within their outer containment buildings after
cooling system failure. Residents within a 20 km (12 mi) radius of the Fukushima I Nuclear Power
Plant and a 10 km (6.2 mi) radius of the Fukushima II Nuclear Power Plant were evacuated. In
addition, the U.S. recommended that its citizens evacuate up to 80 km (50 mi) of the plant.
Early estimates placed insured losses from the earthquake alone at US$14.5 to $34.6 billion.
The Bank of Japan offered ¥15 trillion (US$183 billion) to the banking system on 14 March in aneffort to normalize market conditions. The overall cost could exceed US$300 billion, making it themost expensive natural disaster on record. The earthquake moved Honshu 2.4 m (8 ft) east andshifted the Earth on its axis by estimates of between 10 cm (4 in) and 25 cm (10 in).

2.

Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake (January 1995)

On 17 January 1995, an earthquake with a 7.3
magnitud e on the Richter scale occurred at Awaji Islandof Hyogo Prefecture in Western Japan. It killed 6,434
people; injured 43,792; destroyed 104,906 houses; half
destroyed 144,274 houses; and partially destroyed
390,506 houses. The fires that broke out because of theearthquake burned down an area of 835,858 square
meters.
Restoration Process and Efforts Toward “Creative Reconstruction”
Despite difficult conditions, including severed traffic networks and paralyzed urban functions,steady restoration took place through the dedicated efforts of those involved and with generous
assistance from around the world. In only six days following the Earthquake, provisional supplyof electricity was restored, with water and gas reconnected in three months.
The Priority Three-Year Reconstruction Plan was implemented to press forward the urgently
needed reconstruction of living quarters for the victims, and also the restoration of industries andinfrastructure such as roads, harbors, and railways. In addition, the Great Hanshin-Awaji
Earthquake Reconstruction Plan (Hyogo Phoenix Plan) was formulated with the aim of achieving“creative reconstruction” over a period of ten years. The Phoenix Plan called for not only mere
restoration but also the creation of urban communities that meet the needs of the increasingly
aging society and Japan’s highly maturing economy.
With the extent of restoration in housing, industries, and urban infrastructure accomplishedthus far, the quantitative targets set in the Priority Three-Year Reconstruction Plan weresuccessfully achieved.
On January 17, 2005, the 10th Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Memorial Service was held in
the presence of Their Majesties The Emperor and Empress of Japan.
Hyogo continues to exert its utmost efforts to support disaster-hit elderly citizens to regain theirself-reliance, create sources of communal vitality, and establish safe and secure communities.
3. Typhoon No. 23 (TOKAGE) (October 2004)
On 20 October 2004, Typhoon No. 23 landed on Japanand caused floods and landslides triggered byrecord-breaking torrential rain and high wave. Ninety-five(95) people were killed; 555 injured; 909 houses were totally
destroyed; more than 18,000 houses were damaged; andabout 55,000 were inundated.

Natural Disasters in Japan from 1900 to 2011

Top 10 Disasters in Japan for the Period 1900 to 2011

C.

Disaster Management in Japan

Japan is located in the circum-Pacificmobile zone where seismic and volcanic
activities occur constantly. Although thecountry covers only 0.25% of the land area,
the number of earthquakes and distribution ofactive volcanoes is quite high.
Also,because of geographical, topographical andmeteorological conditions, it is also subject tofrequent natural disasters such as typhoons,
torrential rains and heavy snows.
Every year, there is a great loss of people’s lives and property in Japan due to natural
disasters. Up until the 1950s, numerous large-scale typhoons and earthquakes caused
extensive damage and thousands of casualties. However, with the progress of society’s
capabilities to address disasters and mitigation of vulnerabilities to disasters by developing
disaster management systems, promoting national land conservation, improving weather
forecasting technologies, and upgrading disaster information communications system, disasterdamage has shown a declining tendency.
In spite of such efforts, in 1995, more than 6,400 people became casualties of the Great
Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, and in 2004, 10 typhoons – the largest number in a single year onrecord – crossed over Japan, causing damage throughout the nation. There is also a highprobability of the occurrence of large-scale earthquakes in the coming decades. As such,natural disasters remain a menacing threat to the safety and security of the country.
1. Progress in Disaster Management Law and Systems
Repeated flooding of large rivers in Japan in the 1890s led to the enactment of the River Act(1897), which served as the basis for flood control and Forest Act (1897), which served as thebasis for flood control planning and establishment of systematic flood control management. The
Nankai Earthquake of 1946 that left 1,432 dead or missing also exposed the shortcomings ofrescue systems and led to the establishment of the 1947 Disaster Relief Law.
Furthermore, in order to implement systematic emergency measures, the Fire Services Act
and Flood Control Act were formulated in 1948 and 1949, respectively, followed by otherlegislation such as the Seashore Act (1956) and the Landslide Prevention Act (1958). However,
the immense damage caused by Typhoon Ise-wan in 1959, with 5,098 either dead or missing,marked a turning point in disaster management, giving rise to a movement to plan and prepare acomprehensive disaster management system, and in 1961, the Basic Act for Disaster
Countermeasures came into force. To protect the country, and lives and properties of people
from disaster, the Basic Act stipulates that the Government, local governments and public
institutions shall work out appropriate disaster management systems with each of these sectors
assigned its own responsibilities while formulating measures against disasters including disasterprevention, emergency response and restoration in the event of a disaster.
Following the enactment of the Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act, various initiatives havebeen taken to achieve affective disaster preparedness including the passing of related laws,
establishment of disaster management systems, promotion of national land conservation
projects and research and development in science and technology to mitigate the effects ofdisaster.

2. Mission of the Cabinet OfficeAlong with a series of reforms of central government systems in 2001, the post of Minister ofState for Disaster Management was newly established to integrate and coordinate disaster
reduction policies and measures of ministries and agencies. In the Cabinet Office, which is
responsible for securing cooperation and collaboration among related government organizations
in wide-ranging issues, the Director-General for Disaster Management is mandated to undertakethe planning of basic disaster management policies and response to large-scale disasters, aswell as conduct overall coordination.
Additionally, taking into account the lessons learned from the Great Hanshin-Awaji
Earthquake, the Cabinet Secretariat system was also strengthened, including the appointment of
the Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary for Crisis Management and the establishment of the Cabinet
Information Collection Center, to strengthen risk management functions to address emergencies
such as large scale disasters and serious accidents. Thereby, the Cabinet Office has a role insupporting the Cabinet Secretariat regarding disaster management matters.

3. The Central Management Council
The Central Management Council is one of the Councils that deal with crucial policies of
the Cabinet, and is established in the Cabinet Office based on the Disaster Countermeasures
Basic Act. The council consists of the Prime Minister, who is the chairperson, Minister of State
for Disaster Management, all ministers, heads of major public institutions and experts. The
council promotes comprehensive disaster countermeasures including deliberating important
issues on disaster reduction according to requests from the Prime Minister or Minister of State
for Disaster Management.

4. Duties of the Central Management Council






5.

Formulate and promote implementation of the Basic Disaster Management Plan andEarthquake Countermeasures Plans
Formulate and promote implementation of the urgent measures plan for major disasters
Deliberate important issues on disaster reduction according to request from the Prime
Minister or Minister of State for Disaster Management (basic disaster management
policies, overall coordination of disaster countermeasures and declaration of state ofdisaster emergency)
Offer opinions regarding important issues on disaster reduction to the Prime Minister andMinister of State for Disaster Management.
Disaster Management Planning
A. Disaster Management Planning System




B

Basic Disaster Management Plan: This plan is a basis for disaster reduction activities
and is prepared by the Central Disaster Management Council based on the Disaster
Countermeasures Basic Act.
Disaster Management Plan: This a plan made by each designated governmentorganization and designated public corporation based on the Basic Disaster
Management Plan
Local Disaster Management Plan: This is a plan made by each prefectural andmunicipal disaster management council, subject to local circumstances and based on the
Basic Disaster Management Plan.

Basic Disaster Management Plan

The Basic Disaster Management Plan statescomprehensive and long-term disaster reduction
issued such as disaster management related systems,
disaster reduction projects, early and appropriate
disaster recovery and rehabilitation, as well as scientificand technical research.
It consists of various plans for each type of disaster,where tangible countermeasures to be taken by eachstakeholder such as the national and local
governments, public corporations and other entities aredescribed for easy reference according to the disaster
phases of prevention and preparedness, emergency
response, as well as recovery and rehabilitation.

6. Disaster Management Related BudgetThenational
budgetfordisastermanagement is Approximately 4.5 Trillion Yen(average annual budget from 1995 to 2004),
accounting for approximately 5% of the total
amount of the budget for general accounts.
The percentage for each field:
 Scientific Technology Research –
1.3%





Disaster Prevention and Preparedness – 23.6%
National Land Conservation – 48.7%, andDisaster Recovery and Rehabilitation – 26.4%

7. Disaster Response Mechanism
In Japan’s disaster management system, it is the responsibility of the affected municipalities
to respond to disasters, and only in extreme cases do the related prefectures support themunicipalities by carrying out overall coordination efforts.
Furthermore, when even the prefectures are having difficulty handling the situation thenational government steps in to help.
For large-scale disasters, affecting wide areas, the Prefectural Emergency Relief
Headquarters is expected to play a central role in the recovery process.

VI.

Research Study on Earthquake

An earthquake is a tremor of the earth's surface usually triggered by the release ofunderground stress along fault lines. This release causes movement in masses of rock andresulting shock waves. In spite of extensive research and sophisticated equipment, it is
impossible to predict an earthquake, although experts can estimate the likelihood of anearthquake occurring in a particular region.
A. Pacific Ring of Fire
The Pacific Ring of Fire (or sometimes just the
Ring of Fire) is an area where large numbers ofearthquakes and volcanic eruptions occur in the basin of
the Pacific Ocean. In a 40,000 km (25,000 mi)
horseshoe shape, it is associated with a nearlycontinuous series of oceanic trenches, volcanic arcs,

and volcanic belts and/or plate movements. The Ring of Fire has 452 volcanoes and is home toover 75% of the world's active and dormant volcanoes. It is sometimes called the circum-Pacificbelt or the circum-Pacific seismic belt.
About 90% of the world's earthquakes and 80% of the world's largest earthquakes occur
along the Ring of Fire. The next most seismic region (5–6% of earthquakes and 17% of theworld's largest earthquakes) is the Alpide belt, which extends from Java to Sumatra through theHimalayas, the Mediterranean, and out into the Atlantic. The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is the third mostprominent earthquake belt.
Tectonic plates of the world

The Ring of Fire is a direct result of plate
tectonics and the movement and collisions oflithospheric plates. The eastern section of the ring is
the result of the Nazca Plate and the Cocos Plate
being subducted beneath the westward moving
South American Plate. The Cocos Plate is being
subducted beneath the Caribbean Plate, in Central
America. A portion of the Pacific Plate along withthe small Juan de Fuca Plate are being subductedbeneath the North American Plate. Along thenorthern portion the northwestward moving Pacific plate is being subducted beneath the AleutianIslands arc. Further west the Pacific plate is being subducted along the Kamchatka Peninsula
arcs on south past Japan. The southern portion is more complex with a number of smaller tectonic
plates in collision with the Pacific plate from the Mariana Islands, the Philippines, Bougainville,
Tonga, and New Zealand; this portion excludes Australia, since it lies in the center of its tectonic
plate. Indonesia lies between the Ring of Fire along the northeastern islands adjacent to andincluding New Guinea and the Alpide belt along the south and west from Sumatra, Java, Bali,
Flores, and Timor. The famous and very active San Andreas Fault zone of California is atransform fault which offsets a portion of the East Pacific Rise under southwestern United Statesand Mexico. The motion of the fault generates numerous small earthquakes, at multiple times aday, most of which are too small to be felt. The active Queen Charlotte Fault on the west coast of
the Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, Canada, has generated three large earthquakes
during the 20th century: a magnitude 7 event in 1929, a magnitude 8.1 occurred in 1949
(Canada's largest recorded earthquake) and a magnitude 7.4 in 1970.
While most earthquakes are caused by movement of the Earth's tectonic plates, humanactivity can also produce earthquakes. Four main activities contribute to this phenomenon:
storing large amounts of water behind a dam (and possibly building an extremely heavy building),
drilling and injecting liquid into wells, and by coal mining and oil drilling. Perhaps the best known
example is the 2008 Sichuan earthquake in China's Sichuan Province in May; this tremor
resulted in 69,227 fatalities and is the 19th deadliest earthquake of all time. The Zipingpu Dam isbelieved to have fluctuated the pressure of the fault 1,650 feet (503 m) away; this pressure
probably increased the power of the earthquake and accelerated the rate of movement for thefault. The greatest earthquake in Australia's history is also claimed to be induced by humanity,
through coal mining. The city of Newcastle was built over a large sector of coal mining areas.
The earthquake has been reported to be spawned from a fault that reactivated due to the millions
of tonnes of rock removed in the mining process.
Earthquakes can be recorded by seismometers up to great distances, because seismic
waves travel through the whole Earth's interior. The absolute magnitude of a quake isconventionally reported by numbers on the Moment magnitude scale (formerly Richter scale,magnitude 7 causing serious damage over large areas), whereas the felt magnitude is reported
using the modified Mercalli intensity scale (intensity II–XII).

Every tremor produces different types of seismic waves, which travel through rock withdifferent velocities:
Longitudinal P-waves (shock- or pressure waves) - The name P-wave stands either for
primary wave, as it has the highest velocity and is therefore the first to be recorded; orpressure wave, as it is formed from alternating compressions and rarefactions
As an earthquake warning
Earthquake advance warning is possible by detecting the non-destructive primary waves thattravel more quickly through the Earth's crust than do the destructive secondary and Rayleighwaves, in the same way that lightning flashes reaches our eyes before we hear the thunder
during a storm. The amount of advance warning depends on the delay between the arrival of
the P-wave and other destructive waves, generally on the order of seconds up to about
60–90 seconds for deep, distant, large quakes such as Tokyo would have received before
the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. The effectiveness of advance warning depends
on accurate detection of the P-waves and rejection of ground vibrations caused by local
activity (such as trucks or construction) otherwise false-positive warnings will result.
Technology currently in use known as the Quake Guard system employs this technique toautomate emergency response procedures that protect against loss of life and reduce
property damage

Transverse S-waves (both body waves) - A type of seismic wave, the S-wave, secondarywave, or shear wave (sometimes called an elastic S-wave) is one of the two main types ofelastic body waves, so named because they move through the body of an object, unlike
surface waves.
The S-wave moves as a shear or transverse wave, so motion is perpendicular to the directionof wave propagation: S-waves are like waves in a rope, as opposed to waves moving througha slinky, the P-wave. The wave moves through elastic media, and the main restoring force
comes from shear effects. These waves do not diverge, and they obey the continuity
equation for incompressible media:

Surface waves — (Rayleigh and Love waves)

Propagation velocity of the seismic waves ranges from approx. 3 km/s up to 13 km/s,
depending on the density and elasticity of the medium. In the Earth's interior the shock- or P
waves travel much faster than the S waves (approx. relation 1.7 : 1). The differences in travel timefrom the epicentre to the observatory are a measure of the distance and can be used to image
both sources of quakes and structures within the Earth. Also the depth of the hypocenter can becomputed roughly.
In solid rock P-waves travel at about 6 to 7 km per second; the velocity increases within the deep
mantle to ~13 km/s. The velocity of S-waves ranges from 2–3 km/s in light sediments and
4–5 km/s in the Earth's crust up to 7 km/s in the deep mantle. As a consequence, the first waves
of a distant earth quake arrive at an observatory via the Earth's mantle.
B. HAZARDS POSED BY EARTHQUAKES
1. GROUND SHAKING
The destructive effects of earthquakes are due
mainly to intense GROUND SHAKING or vibration.
Because of severe ground shaking, low and tallbuildings, towers and posts may tilt, split, topple orcollapse, foundation of roads, railroad tracks andbridges may break, water pipes and other utility installations may get dislocated, dams andsimilar structures may break and cause flooding, and other forms of mass movement may begenerated. It can also cause secondary hazards such as liquefaction and landslides.
Liquefaction and landslides can be experienced as far away as 100km from the epicenter. These
destructive effects of earthquakes may cause casualties and short to long term socioeconomic
disruptions
2. GROUND RUPTURE
Many strong earthquakes originate along
faults that break the earth’s rigid crust. GROUNDRUPTURE is a deformation on the ground that marks
the intersection of the fault plane with the earth’s
surface. The most common manifestation is a long
fissure extending from a few kilometers to tens ofkilometers, although ground rupture may also occur asa series of discontinuous crack, mounds ordepressions. The length of ground rupture and thewidth of the zone of deformation generally increase
with the magnitude and type of earthquake. A ground rupture is rarely confined to a simple
narrow and distinct line and the zone of deformation could be as wide as 100m.
3. TSUNAMI
Tsunamis are giant sea waves generated mostly
by submarine earthquakes. Not all submarine
earthquakes, however, can cause tsunamis to occur.
Tsunamis can only occur when the earthquake isshallow-seated, and strong enough about (M6) todisplace parts of the seabed and disturb the mass ofwater over it. Other causes of tsunamis include
submarine or coastal landslides, pyroclastic flows
and large volume debris avalanches from submarine
and partly submerge volcanoes, and caldera collapse
4. LIQUEFACTION
Liquefaction is a process where particles ofloosely consolidated and water-saturated deposits offine sand are rearranged into more compact state.
Water and sediments are squeezed out towards thesurface in the form of water and sand fountaining(sand boiling) and thus creating a condition
resembling ‘quick sand’. The consequent loss involume and underlying support results in subsidenceof the ground on top of the liquefying sandy layers
and with it, the sinking and /or tilting of any structures
above it. Liquefaction prone areas can be found inbeach zones, sand spits, sand bars, tombolos, wide
coastal plains, deltaic plains, floodplains, abandoned river meanders, former lake beds, former orexisting marshlands and swamplands, and in areas underlain by sandy lahar deposits.

5. LANDSLIDES
Landslides are downward movement of slope
materials either slowly or quickly. A landslide may be
a rock fall, topple, and slide or lateral spreading.
Intense ground shaking can trigger a landslide byloosening the cohesion that bonds the slope
materials together, thereby making it easier forgravity to pull it downwards. Hilly and mountainous
areas, escarpments, and steep river banks, sea cliffs,
and other steep slopes are prone to landsliding. The
main effect of landsliding is burial.
6. FIRE
Earthquakes can cause fires by damaging
electrical power or gas lines. In the event of water
mains rupturing and a loss of pressure, it may also
become difficult to stop the spread of a fire once it has
started. For example, more deaths in the 1906 San
Francisco earthquake were caused by fire than by theearthquake itself.
7. FLOOD
A flood is an overflow of any amount of waterthat reaches land. Floods occur usually when thevolume of water within a body of water, such as ariver or lake, exceeds the total capacity of theformation, and as a result some of the water flows
or sits outside of the normal perimeter of the body.
However, floods may be secondary effects ofearthquakes, if dams are damaged. Earthquakes
may cause landslips to dam rivers, which collapse
and cause floods.
8. HUMAN IMPACT
An earthquake may cause injury and loss of lives.
The aftermath may bring diseases due to lack of basic
necessities.

VII.

EARTHQUAKES AROUND THE WORLDWorldwide, over the last few decades, a marked increase in more powerful earthquake
activity is painfully obvious. Information, preparation and understanding of these massive
natural disasters is critical for the effective reduction in loss of lives and properties. The carefully
prepared and knowledgeable response from managers and first responders through effective
training and preparation programs is an absolute necessity.
Earthquakes caused the greatest loss of life, while powerful, were deadly because of theirproximity to either heavily populated areas or the ocean, where earthquakes often create
tsunamis that can devastate communities thousands of kilometers away. Regions most at risk forgreat loss of life include those where earthquakes are relatively rare but powerful, and poor
regions with lax, unenforced, or nonexistent seismic building codes.
Many different methods have been developed for predicting the time and place in which
earthquakes will occur. Despite considerable research efforts by seismologists, scientifically
reproducible predictions cannot yet be made to a specific day or month. However, forwell-understood faults the probability that a segment may rupture during the next few decades
can be estimated.
Earthquake warning systems have been developed that can provide regional notification ofan earthquake in progress, but before the ground surface has begun to move, potentially allowing
people within the system's range to seek shelter before the earthquake's impact is felt.
A. JapanJapan is located at a point on the earth’s surface where four of more than 10 tectonic plates
covering the globe crushed against each other, making it earthquake-prone. More than 20% of
the world’s earthquakes (magnitude 6 or greater) have occurred in or around Japan.
Japan is well acquainted with the massive inter-plate earthquakes produced by platesubduction (such as the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923) and the inland crustal earthquakes
caused by plate movements (such as the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake of 1995)
It has been pointed out with a great sense of urgency that Japan can be struck by alarge-scale earthquakes in the next few decades, such as the Tokai Earthquake, Tonankai andNankai Earthquakes, earthquakes around Japan and Chishima trenches and Tokyo Inland
earthquakes.
Regarding trench-type earthquakes, following related laws and regulations, respective
actions are being undertaken; including the designation of areas where various
countermeasures need to be strengthened, the reinforcement of observations systems and theformulation of a plan of action by relevant government organizations and private corporations.
In addition, preparations such as improvements in evacuation sites and firefighting facilities arebeing promoted based on laws specifying special financial measures.
1.

Study on the Tonankai and Nankai Earthquake:

Tonankai Earthquake is potentially a twin or triple earthquake that could occur practicallysimultaneously (from the same day scale to years delay scale.) The last case of the Tonankai
Earthquake Disaster happened in 1944 and its twin one, the Nankai Earthquake Disasteroccurred in 1946, two years later.
The next Tonankai is predicted to occur within the earlier
half of this 21st century with a probability of 80 to 90 percent. This twin or triple earthquake
disaster is known to be periodic with a frequency of 100 to 150 years. Every time it occurs, it istwin or triple and the impact of each single earthquake is colossal, with a magnitude of more than
8.0 in Richter scale. If multiplied by simultaneous occurrences, the damage would be
devastating.
The Government of Japan and research communities of natural hazard and disasterprevention in Japan have already started special research projects such as “Daitoshi-Daikibo
Jishin Saigai Tokubetsu Project” known as “Dai-Dai-Toku Project” for short. (The meaning is
Pacific Megalopolis Catastrophic Earthquake Disaster Research Initiative Project. It is
commonly called the “Tonankai Initiative Project” in English.)In 2003, the Central Disaster Management announced a damage estimation after examining
the possible epicenter zone, strength of tremors and distribution of tsunami wave height.

Estimation of Damage caused by Possible Earthquakes

Maximum Case

Tokai Earthquake

No. of Victims (Persons)

9,200(7,900 by strong
tremor)
260,000
37,000No. of Houses Destroyed
Economic Loss

Tonankai / Nankai
Earthquakes
18,000(8,600 by tsunami)
36,00057,000In 2003, the Central Disaster Management Council established the “Policy Framework for
Tonankai and Nankai Earthquakes,” which establishes the tsunami disaster management system
and wide-area disaster management support system, and promoting the planned urgent
prevention countermeasures.
In 2005, the Central Disaster Management Council drafted the “Tonankai and Nankai
Earthquake Disaster Reduction Strategy, “ which sets forth an overarching goal of halving theestimated deaths and economic loss within a 10-year period, as well as the strategic targets tocreate a tsunami hazard map in all the relevant municipalities. In 2006, the “Guidelines for
Tonankai and Nankai Earthquake Emergency Response Activities” were drafted.

1.1 Disaster Prevention and Preparedness
The immense damage caused by Typhoon Ise-wan in 1959, with 5,098 either dead or
missing, marked the turning point in disaster management in Japan. The incident prompted thegovernment to draw up Disaster Countermeasures Act, invest in disaster preventive facilities andproactive policy-making started in an organized manner, leading to the establishment of thefoundations of the comprehensive disaster prevention system.
a. National Land Conservation
National land conservation projects such as river
improvement, soil erosion control (sabo), and soil andcoastline conservation are carried out strategically forprotecting national land, citizen’s live and property fromvarious disasters. Although long term plans by field had
been formulated in the past, the “Selective
Infrastructure Improvement Plan” was set forth in 2002
to promote prioritized, effective and efficient
infrastructure improvement projects. Additionally, the“Forest Improvement and Conservation Works masterPlan” was formulated in 2003 to promotecomprehensive and effective forestry improvement and soil conservation project.
To create an environment in which people not only in the rural area but also in cities can live
safely, it is essential to conserve multi-functionality by the conservation and redevelopment ofagriculture, forestry and fisheries, rural communities and forests.
b. Observing, Forecasting
Disaster Risks

andWarningofObservation systems that can accurately detectdisaster risks in real-time have been progressively
improved for establishing early warning systems,

supporting the early evacuation of residents and response activities of disaster management
organizations, and thereby reducing disaster damage. The Japan Meteorological Agency(JMA) use 24-hour systems to carefully monitor various natural phenomena and weather
conditions.
In addition to announcing observed information related to natural phenomena, the JMA
issues a wide range of forecasts, warnings and advisories regarding earthquake-generated
tsunamis and severe weather events such as heavy rains.
c. Information and Communication Systems
The development of a quick and accurate
communications system is essential for the effective
use of early warning information. The JMA has built
and online system linking disaster management
organization of the national and local governments andmedia organizations.
Disaster management organizations have also
been developing radio communications networks
exclusively for disasters: the Central Disaster Management Radio Communication Systems
which connects national organizations; the Fire Disaster Management Radio Communications
System which connects firefighting organizations across the country; and prefectural andmunicipal disaster management radio communications systems which connect local disastermanagement organizations and resident. The Cabinet Office has developed the Central
Disaster Management Radio Communications System so that designated governmentorganizations and designated public corporations can use telephones or facsimiles via a hotline
and has prepared an image transmission circuit so that pictures of disaster situations can betransmitted from helicopters in real-time.
Furthermore, as a backup for terrestrial
communications, a satellite communications system has also been constructed.
Simultaneous wireless communications systems using outdoor loudspeakers and indoor
radio receivers are used to disseminate disaster information to residents. Tsunami and severe
weather warnings are widely provided to citizens via TV and radio broadcasts.
d. Integrated Disaster Management Information System
Based on the experiences of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, the Cabinet Office has
been developing an integrated disaster management information system that helps to grasp thesituation sharing among relevant organizations, thereby enabling quick and appropriate
decision-making for emergency response operations.
1. Earthquake Disaster Information System (DIS)
DIS is automatically activated upon the receipt of earthquake (intensity level 4 or greater)
information from the JMA to estimate the approximate distribution of seismic intensity
and scale of damage (human suffering and building damage) within 30 minutes.
2. Real Damage Analysis System by Artificial Satellite (RAS)RAS uses satellite images to assess actual disaster damage when it is otherwise difficult
to determine the disaster situation due to the disruption of transportation andcommunication networks.
3. Disaster Information Sharing Platform (PF)PF is common information sharing system with a standardized information format, where
various disaster information provided by ministries and agencies, local government,
relevant organizations and residents can be posted and freely accessed by all.

e. Development of Disaster Management Bases
In order to secure wide-area collaboration for quick and smooth response and recovery andrehabilitation activities at the time of a large-scale disaster, disaster management bases withsuch functions as information management, operations coordination and logistics need to be
developed and networks formed.
The Cabinet Office is constructing main wide-area disaster management bases incooperation with relevant ministries in Ariake-no-Oka (Tokyo) and Higashi-Ogishima (Kanagawa)in the Tokyo Bay area; these will function as core bases for responding to a large-scale disasterin the Tokyo metropolitan area.
Additionally, subsidies are provided to local governments to promote qualitative andquantitative improvements of local disaster management bases.
f.

Issuing of Evacuation Order and Instruction

When a disaster occurs or is imminent, residents may start evacuating on their own and theMayor of the municipality may also issue an evacuation order or instruction.
It is effective for municipalities to prepare a manual explaining the criteria regarding disastersituations that require the issuance of evacuation orders or instructions, thereby helping theMayor’s quick decision. The Cabinet Office, in cooperation with relevant ministries, publishedthe “Guidelines for Producing Decision and Dissemination Manual for Evacuation Orders andInstructions” in 2005, and is promoting its implementation.
g. Measures for People Requiring Assistance During DisasterIn view of the aging society and the increasing number of the elderly being killed or injured bydisasters, measures to provide necessary assistance to those such as the elderly and physically
impaired at the time of a disaster need to be reinforced.
In cooperation with relevant ministries, the Cabinet Office published the “Guidelines for
Evacuation Support of People Requiring Assistance During a Disaster” in 2005 (revised in 2006)
to be implemented at the municipal level. The guidelines describe:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

Improving the information communications system
Sharing of information concerning people requiring assistance during disaster
Creating a tangible evacuation support plan for those people
Assistance at evacuation centers; andCollaboration among related organizations.

Tangible countermeasures are included such as the issuance of evacuation preparation
information which calls for the early evacuation of people requiring assistance among disastermanagement and social welfare-related organizations (exceptional use of social welfare-related
personal information to prepare evacuation support system for the elderly and others).
h. Disaster Reduction Drills and Exercises
Disaster reduction drills and exercises are good opportunities to review theeffectiveness of the disaster management system in view of quick and appropriate
emergency operations and to enhance public awareness through wide participation. The
Disaster Countermeasures Basic Act stipulates the obligations of disaster reduction drills.
In order to promote various drills and exercises nationwide, the Central DisasterManagement Council sets forth an annual “Comprehensive Disaster Reduction Drills Plan,”which stipulates the basic principles for executing the drills and outlines the comprehensive
disaster reduction drills carried out by the national government in cooperation with local
governments and relevant organizations.
2. EARTHQUAKE DISASTER COUNTERMEASURES
A. Observation System
1.

Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

In order to constantly monitor seismic activity, the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) andother relevant organizations install and maintain seismometers that are used for estimating thelocation of the epicenter and magnitude of an earthquake as well as for tsunamis forecasts andseismic intensity meters that measure the intensity of ground motion, in numerous places
nationwide. As soon as the earthquake occurs in or around Japan, the JMA analyzes the datefrom various seismometers and seismic intensity meters. Within about two minutes, it issues asseismic intensity information report for earthquakes of intensity 3 or greater and within about fiveminutes issues an earthquake information report indicating the epicenter and magnitude of theearthquake and seismic intensity in the municipalities where strong shaking was observed.
As disaster risk management system took shape, science and technology was also making
advances, social infrastructure became more organized and the mass media became
increasingly conscious of the importance of disaster prevention.
2.

Japan

Agency for Marine Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)JAMSTEC set "Leading project" aside from usual research sections, to focus on researchdevelopment tasks which the government takes its initiative, e.g., development of real-timemonitoring system for massive ocean-trench earthquake, active contribution to the IPCC Fifth
Assessment Report, and research for submarine resources and recyclable energies with
upgrading of exploration technologies.
Earthquake and Tsunami research project for Disaster
Prevention
JAMSTEC has a primary role to the contract
researches requested by MEXT such as "Dense
Oceanfloor Network system for Earthquakes andTsunamis" (DONET), "Research concerning Interaction
between the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai Earthquakes".
JAMSTEC explores earthquake related researchintensively to aim for the contribution to thedevelopment of the state-of-the-art ocean floor
observation technology, advancement of simulation
models of earthquake recurrences, disaster reduction
and mitigation.
JAMSTEC develops real-time dense Oceanfloor
network system around the area of Kumano-nada off Kii
peninsula.
The DONET is a submarine cabled real-time seafloor

observatory network for the precise earthquake andtsunami monitoring. For the purpose of understanding
and forecasting the earthquake and related activities
underneath the seafloor, the twenty sets ofstate-of-arts submarine cabled sub-sea measurement
instrument will be deployed in seafloor at the intervalof 15-20km. The twenty sets of preliminary interface
are prepared in consideration of the improvement ofobservation capability in the future. Operatinglarge-scale subsea infrastructure over a long period of time (20-30 years) is one of a challenge ofunderwater technology. The increase of measurement instruments has a big influence on the
total system reliability, because of the state-of-arts instrument is a bottleneck to maintainlong-term reliability. A novel system design concept is necessary for the observatory network
development to make two demands such as 'high reliability system design' and 'state-of-arts
measurement' united. The observatory network should be able to replace, maintenance andextend while operating, and should be have a redundancy for the internal or external observatory
network component failure. To achieve these requirements, the DONET proposes a composition
that consists of three major components with different system reliability. There are high reliability
backbone cable system, replaceable science node, and extendable measurement instruments.
DONET also contributes mitigation of earthquake and tsunami disasters by rapid detection
and data processing of seismic shaking and tsunami immediately after the earthquake.
B. Earthquake-proofing of Housing and Buildings
More than 80% of the casualties in the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake were caused bybuilding collapse. Likewise, it is presumed that building collapse will be the cause of a large
number of deaths in the damage estimation related to future large-scale earthquakes. However,
it is estimated that there is a problem of earthquake resistance in 25% of the existing residences
as they were built before 1981, when stricter earthquake-proofing building codes wereintroduced. Nearly half of the schools and hospitals are pointed out to have problems related toresistance to earthquake. To promote seismic retrofit of these houses and buildings, agovernmental financial support system, such as subsidiary, low interest loan and favorable
taxation has been established.
In view of this situation, the Central Disaster Management Council drafted the “Urgent
Countermeasures Guidelines for Promoting the Earthquake-proofing of House and Buildings” in
2005, which stipulates that earthquake-proofing throughout the country should be urgently andstrictly enforced in close cooperation with related ministries as a national priority.
The Ratio of Retrofitted Public Schools in Japan

Methods on Retrofitting

Pane
Type

Earthquake Resistant Wall SRC Brace Method
Seismic Free Devices
Vibration Control Technology

The development of seismic retrofitting of roads and bridges is also being implemented. Inorder to prevent or mitigate damage caused by major earthquakes, such as fragmentation of theroad system (with a significant adverse impact on society), the government have been
conducting various road disaster prevention measures.
In particular, securing emergency road transportation routes that links together disastermanagement bases that can be used for rescue activities and transportation of goods at the timeof a large-scale earthquake. To ensure that highway bridges located on emergency
transportation routes are earthquake resistant, they are urgently developing new highway
bridges and effecting seismic retrofit of existing highway bridges according to the new seismic
design standard.
As Japan is surrounded by sea, ships play a vital role in the transportation of foodstuffs, daily
necessities, raw materials for industry and manufactured products. The reliance on sea
transport makes ports indispensable in Japan’s social and economic life. The Port of Kobe, oneof the leading ports in the world, suffered significant damage during the Great Hanshin-Awaji
Earthquake and this had a grave impact on economies at home and abroad.
Many of the Kobe port facilities were damaged, but the earthquake-resistant quays designed
to withstand large-scale earthquake suffered no damage and were used for transportation ofrelief goods within three days after the earthquake. They were used to evacuate residents andfor commuting to work, since parts of the overland traffic system were partly damaged.
Furthermore, approximately 70,000 houses in the city of Kobe were damaged. Since
acquiring a relatively large space of land is easier in the port environs, approximately 16% (5,200

units) were built in the Port of Kobe. Passengers and other vessels moored at the unaffected
quays serves as places for rest and lodging. Having learned from this experience, the Ministryof Land, Infrastructure and Transport have constructed earthquake-resistant quays all over thecountry, to withstand the large-scale earthquakes that are considered to be imminent.
C. Coastline Projects
Japan, totally surrounded by sea, has a deeply indented complex coastline approximately
35,000 kilometers long. And because the country is so narrow and mountainous and theamount of flat land is so limited, the population, assets and social capital are concentrated along
the coast.
The government has been pushing ahead with coastline projects to build coastal
conservation facilities such as embankments, revetments and offshore breakwaters in order toprotect lives and property concentrated along the coast from disasters and to secure nationalland. These measures are designed to reduce the effects of natural disasters occurring incoastal areas.
By introducing comprehensive program to protect the coasts through the multiple functions
provided by a number of extensively laid-out facilities such as artificial reefs, artificial beaches
and gently sloping revetments, enhancing the durability of the facilities and achieving a high levelof coastal conservation including erosion countermeasures but they also take into consideration
the creation of beaches for recreational purposes and the maintenance of the physicallandscape.
3. TSUNAMI COUNTERMEASURES
Surrounded by water on all sides with long and complex coastlines, Japan is highly
vulnerable to earthquake-generated tsunamis. In reality, there has been severe damage
caused by various tsunamis in the past, including the Nihon-kai-Chubu Earthquake (1983),
Hokkaido Nansei-oki Earthquake (1993) and the most recent one, the Tohoku Earthquake(March 2011). In addition to local tsunamis generated by earthquakes near the coast, Japan has
also suffered major damage from the onslaught of distant tsunamis generated by open-sea
earthquakes.
When tsunamis is expected to cause coastal damage, the JMA issues a tsunami warning oradvisory within 2-3 minutes after the earthquake and then follows up with announcements about
the estimated height and arrival time of the tsunami. The information is transmitted immediately
to disaster management organizations and media outlets, and further forwarded to residents andmaritime vessels.
Tsunami countermeasures, such as expediting the announcement/transmission of tsunami
forecasts and improving coastal embankments (tidal embankments) and tide prevention gates,
have been carried out. The Cabinet Office, in cooperation with relevant ministries has preparedguidelines for the creation of a tsunami hazard map and designation/development of tsunami
evacuation buildings by local governments and is working on disseminating the guidelines.
a. Disaster Awareness Enhancement and Disaster Knowledge Dissemination]
The government has also been augmenting the disaster risk reduction system through the
combined activities of self-help, mutual help and public help, which has led to disaster prevention
education in schools, development of voluntary disaster prevention organizations and otherinitiatives.

Disaster education in schools is important for learning necessary disaster knowledge fromchildhood. It is therefore taught in various school curriculums. Social education at thecommunity level including town-watching and hazard-mapping programs in which residents
participate is also important. The Cabinet Office promotes disaster education including sharing
good examples of disaster education programs.
To reduce the damage and injuries caused by disasters, it is very important to notify the
local residents of safe evacuation methods and routes beforehand so that they act appropriately
when a natural disaster occurs. To that end, municipal governments have been taking the leadin preparing and publishing al local Hazard Map, which contains information on danger zones
exposed to the risk of floods, storm surges and tidal waves, landslides, volcanic activity, etc., andon evacuation routes. The government has been supporting this local initiatives by providing
technical manuals and organizing the necessary basic information, and promoting the creationand circulation of Hazard Maps.
Hazard Maps provide guidance to the public so that they will take appropriate action when
faced with an imminent natural disaster; therefore, understanding the nature and purpose of a
Hazard Map is important. Various local activities are being carried out, such as “Town Watching.”
This activity involves local residents monitoring the situation in their hometowns in order to
identify any signs of an impending disaster. Disaster prevention workshops are also held,
through which residents gain a better understanding of the Hazard Map, and they are then able
to collectively participate in the creation of a community disaster prevention map. These activities
will increase the recognition and knowledge of the community regarding disasters and theirprevention, and lead to the generation of public proposals on how to reduce vulnerability,
contributing to enhance local ability to mitigate or prevent disaster.
The Japan Coast Guard has been implementing numerical calculations of tidal waves
caused by the likely earthquakes in the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai areas, as the probability ofmajor seismic events in these regions in the near future is high and has proceeded with themaking of tidal wave disaster prevention information maps reflecting the results of calculations,in order to reduce damages caused by tidal waves.
B. Improvement of Environment for Disaster Reduction Volunteer Activities
Community-based voluntary disaster reduction organizations, firefighting teams andfloodfighting teams play valuable roles in disaster reduction activities. Following the Great
Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake, volunteer activities have expanded in all aspects of disasterprevention, emergency response and recovery and rehabilitation.
The national government has designated January 17th of each year as Disaster Reduction
and Volunteer Day and January 15th and 21st of each year as Disaster Reduction and Volunteer
Week. The Cabinet Office creates opportunities to share information among volunteer groups
and relevant entities and provides useful information to improve the environment for disaster
reduction volunteer activities, including the holding of Disaster Reduction and Volunteer Forum
every year and publishing an Information and Hints Handbook based on information exchange ofactual experiences and challenges of volunteer activities in cooperation with relevant ministries.

B. Philippines
The Pacific Rim is not only a community of the fastest growing and most dynamic nations in
the world. It is also the area exposed to a wide range of natural disaster. The Philippines
archipelago, located near the western edge of the Pacific Ocean, is in the direct path of seasonal
typhoons and monsoon rains which bring floods, storms, storm surges, and their attendantlandslides and other forms of devastation. The Philippines also sits on the "ring of fire" where thecontinental plates collide and thus experience periodic earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. The
Philippine exposure to natural disasters may be characterized as frequent, varied, and severe; a
combination which has made the Philippines society and government extremely sensitive to thechallenge of disaster reduction
Over the past decades, the Philippines have been labeled as one of the most disaster-prone
countries in the world mainly because of its geographic and geologic location and physicalcharacteristics. The country lies along several active fault lines and have active, inactive andpotentially active volcanoes all over the country. Records shows an average of 20 earthquakes
per day and around 100-150 earthquakes felt per year.
1. Study on the Metro Manila Earthquake
a. Fault in the Philippines
The Philippines is located in latitude 5° to 19°45' N. andlongitude 116° to 128° E. Metropolitan Manila is located in thecenter of Luzon Island, between Manila Bay, which extends to theSouth China Sea, and Laguna de Bay. Many earthquake
generators are distributed all over the countryb. Earthquake Generators
The Eurasian Plate (or South China Plate) subducts eastward
beneath Luzon Island along the Manila Trench, and the Philippine Sea Plate subducts westward
along the East Luzon Trench simultaneously. Because of thiscomplex tectonic setting, Luzon Island shows high seismic
activity. The Philippine Islands are sandwiched between two
opposite subduction zones. A long, inland Philippine Fault Zone
(PFZ) lies parallel to the subduction trenches. The PFZ isassumed to release the shear stress caused by the obliquesubduction of the ocean plates. Many faults are identified
around Metropolitan Manila; the West Valley Fault (WVF) andthe East Valley Fault (EVF), which run north to south along thewest and east edge of the Marikina Valley, are thought to posethe greatest threat to Metropolitan Manila due to their proximity.
The faults and trenches around Metropolitan
Manila are shown in the picture. The fault traces basedon geological survey (bold lines) are used for the
analysis of inland fault and the fault traces based onseismic activities (thin lines) are used for the analysis
of offshore fault.
Results of several trenching
excavation surveys at WVF and EVF indicate that atleast two or perhaps four large surface-rupturing
events have occurred since AD 600. Therefore, therecurrence interval of the earthquakes generated isless than 500 years. Study shows that the 1658 and1771 earthquakes could be candidate events for the EVF. However, no event along the WVF isknown. If no earthquake had occurred at the WVF after the 16th century, then the earthquake
occurrence along the WVF becomes a serious threat.
Since 1900, more than 30 earthquakes have caused some damage to Metropolitan Manila.
Many faults have been identified around and within Metropolitan Manila, but the Valley Fault
System that runs north to south along the west and east edges of the Marikina Valley is thought
to pose the greatest threat to Metropolitan Manila due to its close proximity.
Of all the natural disasters that Metropolitan Manila has experienced throughout its history(such as tropical cyclones, droughts and floods, tsunamis, volcanic eruptions, and earthquakes),
earthquakes pose the greatest threat to the life, property, and the economy. Since Metropolitan
Manila is the leading city in the Philippines, and the center of governmental, financial,commercial, and social activities, the impact of a large earthquake in Metropolitan Manila will
greatly affect the nation.
2. The Philippine Response towards Disasters Reduction
The Philippine response towards disaster reduction has been progressively developed andgrown more extensive with every disaster the country has encountered. The disastermanagement program covers disaster preparedness, organization and training, construction ofdisaster reduction facilities, disaster response and rehabilitation, public information, andresearch and development.
Organization and training are continuing disaster preparedness tasks which are performed by
the various Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Centers. Over the past few years, various
emergency services necessary during disasters have been developed in all the regions andprovinces. Designated organizations have been oriented in their various roles in disastermanagement. Local chief executives, particularly those elected to their posts for the first time,
have been provided training on disaster management to equip them to effectively lead their local
disaster coordinating councils. Specialized skills in search and rescue, evacuation, disastermedicine, vulnerability analysis, damage assessment and first-aid have been widely undertaken.
Other disaster preparedness measures have also been undertaken such as disaster drills andexercises, and the establishment of disaster management operations centers. Disastermanagement operations centers have been established with capabilities for a wide range of
emergency services which include rescue, evacuation, emergency housing and relief services.
The National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) is the focalinter-institutional organization in disaster-risk management. It establishes the priorities in the
allocation of funds, services, and relief supplied and plays an advisory role to lower DRRMCs
through the Office of Civil Defense by issuing guidelines. The NDDRRMC issues policy
guidelines on emergency preparedness and disaster operations.

Background of the Study
3. The Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study (MMEIRS)The Earthquake Impact Reduction Study of Metro Manila (MMEIRS) project was
implemented from 2002 to 2004 under the collaborative efforts of the Philippine Institute ofVolcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS), the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
and the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA). The product was enhanced by inputs

from various stakeholders that comprised the MMEIRSTechnical Working Group during the course of the study. The
stakeholders included local government units, member
agencies of the National Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council (NDRRMC) formerly the NDCC, andother national government agencies, utility companies,
professional organizations, and academic institutions. In
support of MMEIRS, the Metro Manila Council has adopted aresolution "declaring the commitment to make Metro Manila
seismically safe, and establishing the mutual aid agreement
among the local government units of Metro Manila in the eventof disasters." The project aimed to produce a master plan forearthquake impact reduction for Metro Manila.
The project developed 18 scenario hazard (ground shaking
and liquefaction) maps for the metropolis. The scenarios
ranged from possible movement along the various earthquake
source zones surrounding or in the metropolis including theValley Fault System. The study also computed for the
projected casualties (death and injuries) including possible
disruption to lifeline facilities that may result from the threeworst case scenarios.
Metropolitan Manila, composed of 13 cities and 4 municipalities by its administrative
boundaries, is the political, economic, and cultural center of the Philippines. The population of
Metropolitan Manila is approximately 10 million at present and it is now one of the most densely
populated areas in Southeast Asia. Geographically, Metropolitan Manila is located on Luzon
Island. Numerous earthquake sources are located in and around it. Among these faults, theValley Fault System, which transects the study area, is considered to potentially cause the largest
impact to the Metropolitan Manila area should it generate a large earthquake. Many researchstudies indicate that active phases of the Valley Faults are approaching and the estimatedmagnitude will be around 7 or more. In order to manage a potential earthquake disaster in Manila,
it is necessary to prepare an earthquake disaster mitigation plan, and to start actions as soon as
possible.
The objectives of the Study are: 1) to formulate a master plan for earthquake impact reduction
for Metropolitan Manila in the Republic of the Philippines, and 2) to carry out technology transfer
to Philippine counterpart personnel of MMDA and PHIVOLCS in the course of the Study. Major
contents of the Study are: 1) existing data collection and evaluation, 2) geological survey, 3)social condition survey, 4) Building and infrastructure survey, 5) important public facilities survey
and dangerous material treatment facilities survey, 6) GIS database development, 7) productionof 1:5,000 scale digital topographic maps, 8) analysis of earthquake ground motion and hazards,
9) earthquake damage estimation, 10) preparation of disaster management plan for Metropolitan
Mania, and 11) community based disaster management activities. The damage estimation of apotential rupture of the West Valley Fault, is that 40% of the total number of residential buildings
within Metropolitan Manila will be heavily or partly damaged, and the earthquake will cause
approximately 34,000 deaths and 1,144,000 injuries. Moreover, fire spreading as a secondary
effect of the earthquake will cause an additional 18,000 deaths.
The Metropolitan Manila area, together with neighboring provinces, is expected to growcontinuously and reach 25 million inhabitants in the expanded urbanized area of 1,500 km2 by
2015. This growing urbanization is creating unacceptable levels of an earthquake disaster interms of both human and property losses. Therefore, the Metropolitan Manila Earthquake Impact
Reduction Study was undertaken to develop a plan and strategies for “A Safer Metropolitan

Manila from Earthquake Impact”.

A. Possible Regional Separation
The proposed emergency road network was overlain onto thecomprehensive regional vulnerability map to determine the possible
separation of areas in Metropolitan Manila because of earthquake
impact. Obviously, roads crossing or passing through the highvulnerable areas are with a high probability of becoming impassable.
Overall, by analyzing passable and impassible roads, it can be
deduced that Metropolitan Manila will possibly be separated into
four regions by the earthquake impact. Reasons for regional
separation are summarized below.
Metro Manila West
Western part of Metropolitan Manila will be isolated from other partof Metropolitan Manila by fire and building collapse
Metro Manila North and Metro Manila South
Northern and Southern part of Metropolitan Manila will be separated
by the building collapse and the geographical condition. The area
between Mandaluyong and Makati has a high possibility of building collapse; Moreover, Pasig
River is running east-west which is naturally disadvantageous in terms of separation.
Metro Manila East
All road networks running east-west, which are on the fault will be broken due to the movement.
Other roads running north-south near in fault areas will be difficult to use, due to the high numberof building collapse.

B. The Goals
The vision resulting from MMEIRS is for "A Safer Metropolitan Manila from Earthquake
Impact." To achieve this vision, the project listed six basic goals:
1) Develop National System Resistant to Earthquake Impact
Metropolitan Manila is the only mega urban center in the Philippines that includes thenational functional backbone consisting of economic, financial, and information activities.
Metropolitan Manila generates about 35% of the total GDP of the Philippines. Also, it is the seatof the Philippine national government including administrative, legislative, and judiciary functions,and international activities. With the rupture of the West Valley Fault, national functions will beparalyzed, and in the worst case, the earthquake will lead to chaos and disruption of the national
economy. Therefore, Metropolitan Manila needs to develop national systems resistant toearthquake impact through improvement and updating of existing systems. Especially targeted
are the following: items for updating of regulations for earthquake disaster prevention, promotionof research and development for disaster prevention technology, capacity building for disaster
response staff from national to community level, installation of modern equipment for disastermanagement agencies. Improvement and enhancement of these existing systems are alreadybeing implemented.
2) Improve Metropolitan Manila’s Urban Structure Resistant to Earthquakes
Recent earthquake damage in the urbanized areas in the world illustrate the extreme
vulnerability of urban structures including buildings and infrastructure (such as roads, railways,
port facilities), and lifelines (including electricity, telecommunication and water supply). Based on
the damage estimation by West Valley Fault system rupture, it is estimated that 40% of the total
residential buildings in Metropolitan Manila will be affected. Since building collapse causes thegreatest number of deaths and injuries, the reinforcement and strengthening of buildings are apriority measure to reduce loss of life. Research and technology development on building
structures and materials should also be promoted including improvement of building codes,
development of design standard for low cost housing and cost-effective construction.
Furthermore, building collapse is the major cause of fire breakouts, so building collapse in thehighly fire-prone areas needs to be reduced. Existing urban structures in the severe damage
estimation area should be improved through re-development of land use. Buildings should beconstructed with higher resistive structures and fireproof materials. Location of open spaces androad widening should be involved for urban re-development. The results of the damage
estimation of infrastructure and lifelines also show the possible impact to society. For example,
malfunction of the port caused by the liquefaction or the collapse of bridges over the Marikina
and Pasig rivers will greatly affect the transportation of people, goods and services to and fromand within the Metropolitan area. The urban structure of Metropolitan Manila includingtransportation infrastructures and lifelines needs to be made resistant to earthquakes in order toreduce loss of life and associated impacts.
3) Enhance Effective Risk Management System
A great number of casualties and injuries are anticipated in the scenario of the West Valley
Fault System rupture, but the actual number of losses will vary depending on the level of
preparedness and effectiveness of the risk management and emergency response systems.
Therefore, to reduce overall losses, an effective risk management system is necessary.
Necessary actions include preventing secondary effects and damages, strengthening disastermanagement practices and response capacity, and ensuring access to critical information.
Robust legal and institutional arrangements, including systems for inter-institutional coordinationand clearly defined and practiced roles of national, regional, city and municipal, and barangay
level governmental and non-governmental entities, are essential to effective management ofearthquake risk.

4) Enhance Community Disaster Management Capacity
In case of large disasters such as a major earthquake, most of the community members will
not be reachable by public assistance immediately. Therefore, to protect community members
from large earthquake impacts, it is important to maximize the preparedness and disaster
response capacity of the community beforehand, through enhancement of social capital. Social
capital in the Metropolitan Manila communities can be developed while recognizing community
autonomy, local leadership, and community dynamics. This enhancement will be promoted
through self-reliant and mutual-help risk management including disaster awareness througheducation and enlightenment.
5) Formulate Reconstruction Systems
To facilitate recovery and maximize the effectiveness of the reconstruction process of thedamaged Metropolitan Manila, the preparation of recovery and reconstruction policies, strategies
and procedures and their acceptance by the relevant agencies are indispensable. At present, thepreparation of the risk management system is not fully developed for effective recovery andreconstruction. Nonexistence of a reconstruction structure and system will generate additional
losses to the society and exacerbate inappropriate and vulnerable urban development. Bothrehabilitation and reconstruction require careful planning and development to prevent further
deterioration of urban structures and environmental degradation.
6) Promote Research and Technology Development on Earthquakes
For the promotion of earthquake impact reduction measures, analysis of present conditions
and future projections related to earthquakes will play an important role. Especially, scientificresearch on large earthquake fault rupture mechanisms, return periods, and distribution of theactive faults are important. The existing research and technology development system in thePhilippines can be enhanced on earthquake science, earthquake engineering, geosciences
under comprehensive those coordination. Especially mechanism of earthquake occurrence,
estimation of earthquake motion, estimation of earthquake damages, comprehensive disastercondition estimation including secondary disaster are to be studied in depth.
C. High Priority Action Plan
Area
Enhance legal framework andinstitutional capacity for disastermanagement
Build Basic Capacity for Relief andRecoveryStrengthen Community
Preparedness
Reduce Damage of Residential
Buildings
EnhanceNational
SystemResistant to Earthquake

Aim
By consolidating the legal background for disastermanagement from national to barangay level, the disastermanagement system of Metropolitan Manila will bestrengthened
Prepare for responding to the survival needs of the people
To survive by the community’s own capacity without relying
on governmental institutions
Reducing the amount of damages to residential buildings
will minimize the estimated losses
Enhancing national system resistant to earthquake anddisruption

4. EARTHQUAKE DISASTER COUNTERMEASURES
A. Integration of Disaster Risk Management in development programs
In 1991 the Philippine Government started a process to integrate disaster mitigation andsustainable development issues within the Medium Term Philippine Development Plans, under
the Development Sector Administration. Within this framework, local governments are required
to integrate their disaster management plans into their respective local development plans. The

most recent “Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan 2004-2010” regarded the issue ofdisaster risk management in different areas:• The need for “geohazard mapping to determine the most vulnerable areas and guidedevelopment plans on settlements, industries and production areas. More importantly, this will
guide relocations and serve as an alert system for existing settlements located in highly
vulnerable areas. The plan described both structural and nonstructural measures to “Mitigate
the occurrence of natural disasters to prevent the loss of lives and properties”. Nonstructural
measures include:- Complete the geohazard mapping- Conduct soil stability measures (e.g., reforestation and planting in river banks) forlandslide-vulnerable areas; and- Ensure integration of disaster preparedness and management strategy in the development
planning process at all levels of governance. This shall be done through the following
activities, namely, among others: periodic risk assessments, updating of respective land
use policy based on the assessment, conduct of disaster management orientation/training
among LGU officials and concerned local bodies, institutionalization of community-based
mechanisms for disaster management.
B. READY PROJECTThe READY project is in line with the national government’s priorities for disaster
preparedness, mitigation and response. Moreover, the project currently addresses the Hyogo
Framework for Action’s identified priorities for action. As this is employing a multi -hazard
approach, it significantly includes hydro-meteorological hazards assessment and promotes
community preparedness actions for those most at risk to the dangers and negative impacts ofthe changing climate. The outputs of this project – specifically the hydro-meteorological related
hazard maps, i.e. flood/ flashfloods, rain-induce landslide, and storm surge -- feeds into the local/ municipal / provincial studies and analysis of options for climate change adaptation. The
learned and acquired experience of communities in the observation of their own early warning
system for floods and the conduct of drills help them develop their resilience to better adapt tothe climate-induced environment.
Natural disasters know no bounds orlimits, but, preparing our communities for
its ill effects is our responsibility
regardless of culture and ethnicity. Thus,
this project is in response to the need fora more rational and effective basis forcontingency and long term development
planning and most importantly, increasing
the capacities of our communities toprepare for and respond to natural
disasters
andultimately,
developadaptive capacity to address climatic risks.
The “Hazards Mapping and Assessment for Effective Community-based Disaster Risk
Management” or READY Project aims to develop a systematic approach to community based
disaster risk management through: (1) scientific multi-hazard mapping as the first step to risk
assessment; (2) community based disaster preparedness; and (3) initiation of mainstreaming ofdisaster risk reduction into the development planning process of the local government units.
This project is most applicable to communities which are prone to natural disaster due to its
geologic setting such as the Philippines. Most specifically, it is applicable for developing
countries where DRRM has started to gain momentum along with efforts to promote Climate Risk
Reduction. In the Philippines, the project addresses the problem of disaster risk managementboth at the national and local level. At the national level, the project aims to institutionalize andstandardize DRM measures and processes by different organizations involved its delivery as
such while management of the timing of project implementation and engagement with local
government have been prioritized. At the community level, it aims to address the non-availabilityof hazard maps, the lack of community based hazard monitoring and warning systems and theneed to build up the capacity of community leaders to implement activities and measures fordisaster reduction. It also aims to empower the most vulnerable municipalities and cities in the
country and enable them to develop effective disaster risk management plans.
The READY project has three main components which articulate the processes of how DRR
is implemented as designed by the key players. Its partnership built through the years has been
the driver in pushing for the achievements of its objectives. The three main components are:
Component I. Multi-hazard identification and assessment(hazard maps produced in the 27 target provinces).
Natural hazards posing risks to concerned communities are documented in the form ofmulti-hazard maps. These maps are peer reviewed by the multiagency mapping group (which
includes PHIVOLCS, PAGASA, NAMRIA, and MGB) together with the executing agency which is
OCD. Once revised and finalized these are then converted into digital format with all data andanalysis integrated by National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA). The
integrated maps will then be presented to concerned local government units (LGUs) through theconduct of IEC campaigns. Updates and further technical comments are then integrated for the
finalization and printing of the maps which are distributed to target LGUs, government offices anddecision makers.
Component II: Community-based Disaster Preparedness
1. Development of Information, Education and Communication (IEC) strategies and materials
for specific target groups
The result of the Project’s mapping arepresented to the concerned local government units(LGU) to inform disaster risk management anddevelopment planning. In preparation of the IEC event,LGU coordination is promoted where maps undergo
peer review, dry run for lectures are held, and training
on how to conduct effective IEC with media/press
beefing/conference and the review/report of activity.
Participants in the IEC Workshops include local
leaders (province, municipalities, cities & villages) andteachers. The Project has also developed
standardized IEC materials such as posters and flyers
user-friendly technical terms for each hazards.

2. Establishment of Community-based Early Warning
SystemThe community based early warning systems(CBEWS) for floods and tsunami is a low-cost,non-structural mitigating system that empowers theconcerned community to plan and act in the event of
sudden on- set disasters like floods/flashfloods and tsunami. In all CBEWS activities,

memoranda of agreements areforged between READY agencies(PAGASA,OCD,
PHIVOLCS,
MGB) and local communities forsustainability. Under the said
agreements, the LGUs provide
financialallocations
fortheoperation and maintenance of the
CBEWS to ensure sustainability ofthe system.
A. Community-based Flood Early
Warning System (CBFEWS)
For flood hazards, a community based and river basin approach is employed and a networkof rainfall and water level monitoring gauges in the river basin of concern is installed. The
communities covering each basin are linked together under one CBFEWS with strategicallyinstalled rain gauges and water level monitoring systems. The warning set up is based on thesource, path and depositional area. Site surveys, installation of monitoring facilities,
measurement of the depth or carrying capacities of rivers to establish flood warning levels,
on-site and formal training of observers and volunteers and pilot testing of the systems throughflood drills. Procedures and activities undertaken include:
Volunteers identified by the LGU officials are mobilized to conduct early warning readings.
The volunteers/ observers are trained to observe and transmit the data to the Disaster Operation
Centers (DOC) of the city/ municipality/village. The observed data is the basis for the LGUs toissue flood warnings, together with the weather forecasts from the local PAGASA station.
B. Community-based Early Warning System for Tsunami
For tsunami hazards, CBEWS, training of trainers for local planners and disaster risk
managers are conducted, signage is installed, evacuation
maps are made and tsunami drills are undertaken in pilot
sites recommended by the experts in consultation withlocal officials in concerned LGUs. Preparatory activities
include site suitability assessment involving site
investigation, gathering of community maps, identificationand evaluation of evacuation sites and routes anddetermination of tsunami signage location. IEC campaign
are conducted a few days before the tsunami drill, when
information on earthquakes and how these can generate
tsunamis and on preparedness activities are taught
during these IEC. The whole community is involved in theevacuation drills and in the conduct of an on-site
assessment–
done
immediately to improve the effectiveness of the exercise.
A set of preparedness activities that teaches barangay
stakeholders information on tsunami and appropriate
response to its hazard are also executed.
C. Information, Education and Communication campaign
conducted for 27 provinces
The READY Project Team is directly responsible for the design and user friendly publication

on natural hazards in the country. Designs havebeen standardized for the reproduction of posters
and flyers. Mapping results and IEC materials are
disseminated province-wide as part of IEC
campaigns with IEC materials covering disasterrisk mitigation. In addition, hazard signage (i.e.
floods, tsunami, landslides and rock fall) areinstalled and special IECs for rain-induced
landslide and flashflood hazards are also being
conducted.
Component II: Initiation of mainstreaming of disaster risk reduction into the local
planning process.
Capacity Building takes place through Training workshops on the use of a hazard and risk
assessment software (REDAS).
Developed by PHIVOLCS in 2002-2004 under the
DOST-Grant-in-Aid project, the REDAS (Rapid Earthquake Damage Assessment System) is
aseismic hazard simulation software that aims to produce hazard and risk maps immediately
after the occurrence of a strong earthquake or for a potentially damaging earthquake (scenarios).
Other hazard maps produced under the project are incorporated into the REDAS software. The
software contains a database of earthquakes and also of critical facilities and elements at risk
(schools, bridges, urban areas, houses). The risk database can be updated by local government.
LGUs were trained on how to use the REDAS risk assessment tools. Target officials trained
include Planning Officers, Disaster Coordinating Council (DCC) members. The modules includes
map reading and functionality of REDAS (e.g. sorting, query, database building, etc), basic
concepts on land use planning, and it also trained Community Officials on how to build their own
hazard and risk database. This GIS software serves as the tools of local planners and disasterrisk managers utilized for land use planning, contingency planning as well development of
preparedness plans in their respective localities.
Project Impacts
The READY Project has become a catalyst in realizing the National Economic and theDevelopment Authority (NEDA) of the Philippines’ endeavor on mainstreaming DRR & CCA in its
Physical Framework Planning. It has triggered sustainable partnerships with the scientific andengineering community, both from the government and private sector, bridged the gap ofscience-based tools for decision-makers/takers, development planners and DRR Managers. It
further demonstrates to the international partners that government agencies involved in the
project can deliver and prudently use the funds that it entrusted, thus, trust and confidence ofinternational & regional bilateral/multilateral partners in projects implementation has beenenhanced resulting in a generation of
innovative
ideas
towards
DRR
implementation and widening the scope ofpartnerships for more relevant programs.
Most importantly, there is increased
recognition, at all levels, that DRR strategies
are indeed interlinked with CCA and it is themost basic applied discipline in pushing for
progressive development, in almost all
sectors. The READY Project is continuing
its implementation in the remaining
provinces to be covered and its
methodologies and strategies have beenrecognized such that its template has been adopted for the greater Metro Manila area andrecognized and at the regional arena.
Lessons Learned♦ A multi-hazard approach and tapping expertise of multi-agencies are effective strategies toensure holistic and effective hazard mapping and public education campaigns.
♦ Development of sustainable community-based early warning systems especially forsudden-onset natural hazards is an effective way to empower communities in disaster risk
mitigation.
♦ Effective and sustainable DRM in the community level must always have LGU support tosucceed.
♦ Local technical expertise exists in the field of hazard mapping and must be engaged/ explored.
♦ It is best to tap local experts for IEC campaigns as they are more familiar with local needs andcan relate more with local people♦ It is important to link non government organizations (NGO) in ensuring sustainable disaster risk
mitigation efforts.

C. “Rapid Earthquake Damage Assessment System (REDAS)” software for thePhilippines
The few minutes after the occurrence of a large andpotentially damaging earthquake are very crucial in
making timely decisions especially information regarding
the deployment of relief and rescue operations. The
agency mandated to issue earthquake bulletins andprovide pertinent information to the public after anearthquake is the Philippine Institute of Volcanology andSeismology (PHIVOLCS) of the Department of Scienceand Technology (DOST). This responsibility becomesvery important when large-magnitude earthquakes occur
and the public wants to know immediately the possible
impacts and damages that a given event might havecaused. To address this concern, a simple anduser-friendly simulation tool or software that can give a
rapid estimate of the possible seismic hazards which canbe used for inferring the severity of impacts to various
elements-at-risk was developed. This software is called“Rapid Earthquake Damage Assessment System” or REDAS. The software was developed by
PHIVOLCS-DOST thru a Grant-in-Aid (GIA) from the Department of Science and Technology(DOST).
REDAS aims to provide quick and near real-time
simulated earthquake hazard information to disastermanagers which will help them in assessing the
distribution and extent of the impacts of a strong
earthquake. This could help them to decide and prioritize
the deployment of timely rescue and relief operations. The
second objective is for the software to serve as a tool inconvincing land use planners, policy makers, city and town
development planners and even local government
executives to consider earthquake hazards in theirplanning and development efforts so as to ensure
long-term mitigation of seismic risks. The hazards that
could be computed using this tool are ground shaking,earthquake-induced landslides, liquefaction and tsunami.

The risk database that are continuously being built in REDAS include population centers, roads
and communication networks, lifelines, high rise buildings, hospitals, schools, churches, banks,markets, hotels, fire stations, power plants, dams and other critical facilities. Other capabilities of
REDAS include earthquake sorting capability, produces seismicity maps, can perform query ofdata points, can produce maps of different sizes, can perform on-screen map digitization andmore importantly, it allows users to build their own risk database by themselves. To date, thesoftware has been provided to some local government units (LGU) as part of the NDRRMC’s
READY Project. To make the software address the other hazards including hydrometeorologicalhazards, the READY multi-hazard maps are also incorporated in REDAS to make it multi-hazard
in approach. For each LGU, training on its use is also provided and the participants are alsotaught how to build their own risk database using maps and GPS. The software is still being
continuously improved by getting feedbacks and inputs from users to make it more attuned totheir needs.
D. Installation of Earthquake Intensity Meters
Almost
two
weeks
after
the
8.9-magnitude quake that rocked Japan andtook thousands of lives and billions of dollars
ininfrastructure, the Philippine Institute ofVolcanology
andSeismology(PHIVOLCS) announced that it will scatter
100
intensity
earthquake
meters nationwide in order to make more
precise readings of earthquakes. The project,said to cost P200M, will commence this year.
The project was funded partly by the Japan
International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
The quake meters would allow seismologists to spread alerts for tsunamis and landslides
faster and, ultimately, save more lives. Several of these meters are to be placed in Metro Manila
and neighboring provinces, populated areas that lie along fault lines. The rest will be installed
throughout the archipelago. PHIVOLCS’ goal was to set up 40 meters in 2011, 30 in 2012, and30 more in the years to follow.
Each seismic meter, said to be worth P85,000, is a box that contains a tiny monitor andequipped with data communication capabilities and will be placed in selected buildings. The
sensors in the meters will instantly calculate the intensity of any tremor felt and then transmit
such data to the database of PHIVOLCS.
Accordingly, a quick and accurate means of measuring an earthquake's intensity is crucial inlessening the number of fatalities as well as the amount of damage in the face of a major natural
catastrophe.
In places where there are no sensors or PHIVOLCS observatories, scientists currently haveto rely on descriptions of the quake’s effects to estimate tremor’s intensity. By getting moreaccurate data, PHIVOLCS could issue faster warnings to at-risk communities and hopefully save
lives and properties. With more sensors, PHIVOLCS can get a clearer picture of when andwhere a tsunami or landslide could take place as a result of an earthquake. This vital information
could then be passed to local governments and emergency councils.
E. Manila Map Viewer
The Metro Manila Map Viewer is a GIS-based Internet tool and is currently being
implemented as a prototype for earthquakes in Metro Manila, Philippines. The Metro Manila Map
Viewer allows users to retrieve useful information and maps from datasets including hazards,

transportation, public facilities, emergency services, elevation, land use/zoning, andhigh-resolution imagery.
The Metro Manila Map Viewer is part of the risk communication tools that are jointly being
developed and endorsed by the Pacific Disaster Center (PDC), and the Earthquakes andMegacities Initiative (EMI) to facilitate information sharing, and to promote city stakeholders
participation, ownership transfer, and a better understanding of the linkages between disaster risk
reduction and development progress. Map Viewers are developed at PDC's headquarters in Maui,
Hawaii, with the ultimate goal of transferring capacity to local clients.
This tool was implemented in Metro Manila as part of EMI's Cross-Cutting Capacity
and/orDevelopment(3cd)
Program(see www.earthquakesandmegacities.org
www.pdc.org/emi)—a long-term inter-disciplinary program envisioned to assist "megacity"
governments in implementing sound disaster risk management practices. The Metro Manila Map
Viewer increases awareness about public safety, is useful during emergencies, also supports
post-disaster recovery processes.

The Metro Manila Map Viewer

F. Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) Initiatives
The MMDA is responsible for services that have metro-wide impact and transcend local
political boundaries, or entail huge expenditures beyond the capability of the individual local
government units (LGUs) of Metropolitan Manila. These services include:
Development Planning - which includes the preparation of medium and long term development
plans; the development evaluation and packaging of projects; investment programming andcoordination as well as the monitoring of plans, program, project implementation.
Transport and Traffic Management – which includes theformulation, coordination and monitoring of policies,
standards, programs and projects to rationalize theexisting transport operations, infrastructure requirements,
the use of thoroughfares; and promotion of safe andconvenient movement of persons, goods; provision forthe mass transport system and the institution of a system
to regulate road users; administration and implementationof all traffic enforcement operations, traffic engineering
services and traffic education programs.

Solid Waste Disposal and Management - which
includes formulation and implementation of policies,
standards, programs and projects for proper andsanitation waste disposal.
It also involve theestablishment and operation of sanitary landfill andrelated facilities and the implementation of otheralternative programs intended to reduce, reuse, andrecycle solid waste.
Flood Control and sewerage management - which
includes the formulation and implementation of policies,
standards, rules and regulations, programs and projects
for an integrated flood control, drainage and seweragesystem.

Urban Renewal, Zoning and Land Use Planning and
Shelter Services – which includes the formulation,
adoption and implementation of policies, standards,
rules and regulations, programs and projects torationalize and optimize urban land use and provide
direction to urban growth and expansion, the rehabilitationand development of slum and blighted areas, thedevelopment of shelter and housing facilities and theprovision of necessary social services.
Health and Sanitation, Urban Protection and Pollution
Control – which includes the formulation andimplementation of policies, rules and regulations,standards, programs and projects for the promotion andsafeguarding of the health and sanitation of the region andfor the enhancement of ecological balance and theprevention, control and abatement of environmental
pollution.
Public Safety – which includes the formulation andimplementation of programs and policies and proceduresto achieve public safety, especially the preparedness forpreventive or rescue operations during times of calamities
and disasters such as conflagrations, earthquake, floodand tidal waves; and coordination and mobilization of
resources and the implementation for rehabilitation andrelief operations in coordination with national agencies
concerned
The disaster management thrusts of MMDA and MMDCC are:1. Emergency Preparedness and Response Capacity-Building
2. Safety Advocacy and Accident Prevention
3. Disaster Consciousness and Education
4. Disaster Mitigation

PROGRAMS
In order to realize the vision that has been set, the MMDA, the national agencies
constituting the MMDCC, and the Metro Manila LGUs complement each other in
implementing disaster management programs in line with the thrusts. The following
activities are currently being undertaken:








Disaster Preparedness through Public Awareness, Education, Planning, and Drills
and Demonstrations
Emergency Response Capacity-Building through organization and training ofdisaster control groups, response planning and rehearsals, institutionalization of
emergency response network, and development of protocols and standards
Disaster Control through the provision of essential services and needs to affected
communities, mobilization of emergency resource and coordination to evacuation,
search, rescue, recovery, and relief operations wherever there is a prevailinghazards, disaster, or emergency incidents
Disaster Prevention and Mitigation through studies, researches and hazards anddisaster information dissemination; Warning and advisories; evacuation of people
from risk areas, formulation of policies, standards, rules and regulations; andstructures inspections and retrofitting
Rehabilitation and Recovery Assistance through financial support and technicalassistance.

Implementation of the above-mentioned programs is done through thecooperation and collaboration of efforts by the various levels and of governance and sector.
Each level or sector shares their resource and expertise in the conduct of disastermanagement activities in the metropolis. Even the private enterprises (e.g. Chinese Fire
Brigade), non-government organizations (e.g. ABS-CBN Foundation Inc., a giant media
network) and volunteers (e.g. Mozart, mountaineers volunteers) play active roles.
The disaster management activities that have been undertaken by the different
agencies constituting MMDCC are:









Structural Inspections and retrofitting –annual activity of the Department of Public
Works and Highways (DPWH) to all bridges
and fly-overs
Drainage systems clearing, reconstruction,and flood Control facilities maintenance –the MMDA in collaboration with DPWH work
on clearing and dredging of canals, rivers
and others waterways
Removal, relocation and evacuation of
settlers from risk areas
Hazards
AwarenessandDisaster
Consciousness projects – July 1-7 of every
years declared as Disaster Consciousness
Week;
demonstrationon
Rescueand
Evacuation, First Aid and Pre-emergency Care;giving awards to personnel that do heroic acts incases of emergencies.
Capacity-building to improve emergency
response-emergency
response
personnel
undergo rigid training on rescue and evacuation,
helicopter and high-rise building rappels, first aid,








underwater rescue operation, etc.
Emergency Preparedness Training
and Disaster Management Seminars
Enforcement of Standards and Rules
on Structures, Land Use, and Zoning –e.g. national Building Code; Metro
Manila Zoning Ordinance 81-01
Review and update of current laws andcodes with safety implications – Fire
Codes of the Philippines and National
Building CodePreparedness and Response Plans Formulation, Review and Updating

The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) being the lead agency of disastermanagement efforts in Manila undertakes / accomplished the following: Instituted a 24-hour Emergency Response System
and upgrade the existing Metro manila Emergency
Operations Control and Coordinating Center(upgraded in terms of equipment and vehicle
support) Developed
and
implementation
emergency
response training modules (eight modules for LGUs,
NGOs, MMDA and students ) Conducted emergency drills and training of around
4,000 students, educators, traffic enforcement
officers, armed forces reservists, drivers, and others
 Evacuated people from flood-risk areas during
height of tropical cyclones and rains Provided the public with the information, warnings
and advisories prior to and during times when there
were hazards and emergency incidents
 Responded the calls for non-emergency medical
assistance Complemented others agencies` efforts in drainage
systems clearing
Collaboration with Civil Engineers with earthquake preparedness measures
The Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) and the 17 mayors of Metro Manila haveagreed to tie up with the Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers (PICE) to address earthquake
preparedness and risk reduction in the National Capital Region.
Engineers from PICE, a non-government organization, have volunteered to conduct
metro-wide inspections of various buildings and structures to assess their structural soundness
and safety.
According to MMDA, the partnership is a most welcome development in the midst of aheightened concern over the vulnerabilities of the region in case of an earthquake. PICE will alsocome up with detailed and viable proposals on how they can assist the government in reducing
the dangers posed by poorly-built and ill-maintained residential structures in Metro Manila.
G. Program for Enhancement of Emergency Response (PEER)

The Program for Enhancement of Emergency Response (PEER) is a regional training
program initiated in 1998 by the U.S. Agency for International Development Office of Foreign
Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and managed by National Society for Earthquake (NSET) tostrengthen disaster response capacities in four Asian countries: India, Indonesia, Nepal, and thePhilippines. These countries were selected to participate in the program based on their highseismic vulnerability, their need to improve their disaster response capacity, and the interest on
the part of their national governments to participate in the program.
All of the involved countries have either prepared disaster response policies or have accessto institutions to help them develop disaster response policies, but they do not have adequate
emergency/disaster response capacity-building programs, as evidenced by a lack of training
curriculum, instructors, and agencies to offer training on a regular basis. While emergency
medical response is at a different stage of development in each of the four countries, none ofthem has a fully established emergency medical response service. For these reasons, PEER
was selected by OFDA as the best intervention to improve the standards of disaster response
and preparedness in the four countries.
The Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, Thailand managed the program from 1999-2003.
Miami-Dade Fire Department, Florida, USA, collaborated with ADPC to implement Phase l of the
program. PEER Phase l served to establish the program foundation within each of theparticipating countries, to test and adapt the courses to the Asian context, and to start developing
a pool of instructors to PEER Phase II, 2003-2008, includes the four PEER countries, with theaddition of Bangladesh. The National Society for Earthquake Technology– Nepal manages
PEER in collaboration with three U.S. Partners: International Resources Group (IRG), Johns
Hopkins University/Center for International Emergencies, Disasters and Refugee Studies(CIEDRS), and Safety Solutions, Inc.
Program Objectives
Establish and strengthen the capability of PEER countries to provide collapsed structure,
search and rescue support, as well as basic and advanced life support, beginning with first
responder agencies and continuing with personnel in medical facilities.


Develop a training system that continually provides disaster response with qualified
personnel for search and rescue and medical first response and medical facilities prepared
to receive victims.



Establish a coordinating network of emergency and medical response and training
institutions and individuals in PEER countries that ensure the continuation of the PEER
process and further promote its evolution.
 PEER curriculum includes four interrelated courses:
 Medical First Responder (MFR)
 Collapsed Structure Search and Rescue (CSSR)
 Hospital Preparedness for Emergencies (HOPE)
 Training for Instructor (TFI)

H. Department of Education and Commission of Higher Education Initiatives
As a preventive measure against disaster the Department of Education (DepEd), the Officeof Civil Defense (OCD) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) have mandates toconcretize disaster preparedness by integrating disaster reduction and management educationin the curricula of the public secondary and tertiary schools.

The soon to be integrated disaster risk reduction
education is outlined under Republic Act 10121
otherwise known as the Disaster Risk Reduction andManagement Act of 2010.
It is during calamities that children are mostvulnerable. It was learned that some schools havestarted adopting introductory courses and modules
on disaster risk reduction at the start of classes thisyear. The NDRRMC tied up with the DepEd in the conductof a training and seminar for teachers expected to handle
the subject.
Some schools have already included disaster risk
reduction in their Earth Science subject even if the subject
have yet to be formally ironed out between the National
Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council (NDRRMC)
and the DepEd. The subject will also be taught in the
National Service Training Program (NSTP) for tertiary
schools, technical-vocational, indigenous learning and in out of school youth courses.
1. Conduct of Earthquake Drills
Regular conduct of quarterly earthquake drill to improve further the capability to execute
emergency management response coordination and procedures: Capacity Building through Organization Disaster
Management Team in every school, office andprivate establishments - to enhance theorganizational plan (including organization offaculty members, student council and safetysystem especially for the special children), Disaster
Preparedness, and Incident Command System(ICS) Regular
conductofearthquake
orientation/workshop (things to do - before, during
and after an earthquake) Updating of earthquake evacuation plan andenhancement of information dissemination andinculcate among the students and teachers theimportance of disaster management
 Reproduction of Information and Education
Campaign (IEC) materials (for distribution) todifferent schools, offices, business establishments,
etc.
In compliance to the NDCC Four Point Plan of Action
for Disaster Preparedness and pursuant to the
pronouncement and instruction of then President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo after the 1st Nationwide Earthquake Drill
on June 20, 2006 that earthquake drills should be
conducted on a quarterly basis and further expand t heparticipation to government and private offices andestablishments, until such time that it will be perfected and people’s reaction during and after anearthquake become second nature to prevent casualties, the nationwide earthquake drill is held
on a quarterly basis.
The Department of Education (DepEd) Secretary issued DepEd Memo No. 300 dated
August 23, 2006 to all DepEd Regional and Division Offices for widest dissemination andcompliance to the directive of PGMA re: Conduct of Quarterly Earthquake Drills in Schools.
An orientation/workshop on How to Conduct a School Earthquake Drill was also conductedprior to the actual day of the earthquake
drill with the following objectives: toensure the safety of parents, students,
teachers and staff during and after
damaging earthquake (real or drill); tohelp school administrators and theirdisaster action groups to design
specific response plan of the school f orearthquakes; to train teachers, schoolstaff and students on how to practiceproper action and response during
earthquakes; and to test various
elements of the response plan
designed by the School Disaster Management Committee.

EARTHQUAKE DRILLS CONDUCTED IN THE PHILIPPINES

5. TSUNAMI COUNTERMEASURES
A. PHIVOLCS Seismic Monitoring Network

The Philippines is prone to earthquakes because it is situated in a geotectonically active
region. It is prone to tsunamis because its coastlines are facing major earthquake generators thatare under the sea. In the past 400 years, the Philippines was affected by at least 40 tsunamis.

Through the years, the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (Phivolcs) and theDepartment of Science and Technology (DOST) have come up with strategies and programs onstrengthening monitoring and hazard mapping, increasing public awareness and establishingcommunity-based early warning systems for tsunami.
After the northern Luzon earthquake of July 16, 1990, Phivolcs-DOST greatly improved its
earthquake-monitoring system. From 12 stations in 1984, they are now operating 66 seismic
stations nationwide. The data is received in real time through satellite, which enables them torelease bulletins in less than 10 minutes.
PHIVOLCS-DOST monitors earthquakes not only nationwide but also globally. To keep watchof tsunami-generating earthquakes that might occur outside the country but could hit the coastal
areas, PHIVOLCS acquired and installed global earthquake-monitoring tools in 2010. With thesetools, they receive seismic data from other world seismic networks. An alarm would automaticallyset off whenever a significant earthquake is detected outside the Philippines, which is why accessto information has become quicker.
1. Tidetool
Another tool that became handy during the monitoring of the tsunami from the Chile 2010
event and the tsunami from Japan on March 11 was a software known as Tidetool from the US
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
This tool enables to monitor if tsunami waves had already hit certain tide gauges installed all
around the Pacific Ocean at an estimated height.
2. Hazard maps
In 2005-2007, PHIVOLCS implemented a project called Tsunami Risk Mitigation. One of the
major outcomes of this program was the generation of tsunami-hazard maps for 43 provinces of
the Philippines with coastal communities. The tsunami-hazard maps were generated based onmodeling of tsunami heights and arrival times.
The tsunami-hazard maps were distributed to provincial offices so that local government
units have information that could be used as basis for land-use and development planning, andearthquake- and tsunami-disaster preparedness.
B. Smart Wireless Engineering Education Program (SWEEP) Schools

Schools are on their way to helping the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology(PHIVOLCS) improve earthquake monitoring across the country with the selection of a low-costintensity meter prototype developed by students of the University of San Carlos in Cebu City.
Once improvements are made, the device will be deployed to schools under the Smart
Wireless Engineering Education Program (SWEEP), who are participating in a first-of-its-kindgovernment-industry-academe
partnership
between PHIVOLCS, wireless leader Smart
Communications, Inc. (SMART), and SWEEP
schools.
The partnership involves getting the schools to
research on low-cost remote monitoring systems
for seismic data transmission and to use theselected prototype to detect ground movement
and help augment findings of PHIVOLCS’ 64
seismic stations nationwide.

The academe also plays a critical role in monitoring hazards. Their mission is to develop a
program where schools form part of a nationwide monitoring system that can help governmentand communities monitor the environment and respond appropriately. The teams themselves
tried to find solutions to certain issues like transmission, accuracy, and presentation of data in aform that members of the community will understand.
Ateneo de Davao University developed a system where
the data being collected can be stored in an SD card,allowing it to work in remote areas and to function without
constant human monitoring. University of Baguio had awell-developed packaging of the instrument, with amini-drum recorder. Adamson University came up with
Internet-accessible monitoring information and disseminationof findings through GSM (or Global System for Moble
communications). To address the problem of delays in thetransmission of data, the students used WiFi technology. Not
only was their design the least expensive to produce andfabricate, it is also user-friendly and compact, making it easy to deploy where needed.
Plans are now underway to further improve the selected prototype by adding the featuresand innovative solutions developed by other participating universities, thus making the project areal collaborative effort. The next step is to fabricate and produce the earthquake-monitoring
instrument , to have them deployed to the SWEEP partner schools for them to be involved in themonitoring of seismic and network them to Phivolcs via Smart connectivity solutions.
Since SMART initiated the partnership in 2005, at least 11 SWEEP schools have committed
to help improve disaster preparedness by researching and developing low-cost intensity metersand participating in monitoring seismic activity to help augment data collected via PHIVOLCS’
existing seismic stations.
To date, there are 40 SWEEP partner schools nationwide. A community initiative of SMART,
the program was launched in 2003 to help raise the level of technology and engineering
education in the country. Now on its second phase, SWEEP is focused on educating schools in
wireless broadband technology, as well as getting them involved in community service initiatives,
one of which is in the field of disaster preparedness

6. NDRRMC Partnership Agreement with Private Sectors
a. Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade(DFAIT) Canada
Canada is contributing PhP 18-million worth of Chemical,
Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Event
Preparedness Equipment to the National Disaster
Coordinating Council (NDCC).
In addition to the contribution of CBRN Event Preparedness
equipment, Canada has been providing First Responder
training in the Philippines since 2005. More than 500 Filipino
firefighters, police personnel, soldiers, and other first
responders have benefitted from this training program. The
course is currently being handed over to the Philippines andwill soon be completely delivered by Filipino trainers, providing participants with alocally-tailored programb. Association of Carriers and Equipment Leasers Inc. (ACEL) ACEL was organized in May of 1966 as a logical step in
addressing the problems associated with the procurement
and utilization of equipment needed to pursue national
initiatives.

c. Civil Defense Action Group Inc. (CDAG) CDAG train young men and women in the basic solutions
that will help you to respond and attend to any troubles. We
teach them how to save lives and properties, test their agility,
perseverance, their efficiency, honesty and above all their
dedication to volunteerism. As of today, CDAG was
appointed to head the Asia-Pacific Maritime Search andRescue Advisory Group (AMSARAG) of the Asia Pacific
Network in order to create maritime emergency responders
throughout the Asia Pacific Region.

d. Task Force Disaster Mitigation, Adaptation & Preparedness
Strategies (DMAPS)
 It is the task force’s goal to set a mechanism to realize acommon goal in developing and applying science-based maps
and models of natural hazards; model of vulnerable
infrastructure and environment; and engineering-based
technologies to reduce the associated natural risks to any
infrastructure development.

e. Office on Muslim Affairs (OMA) Having been tasked to address various issues of the Filipino
Muslim in their participation in nation-building, OMA shallcollaborate with NDCC in terms of disaster preparedness andcapacity building for local disaster management mindful ofsocial-cultural sensitivities.

f. Private Sector Disaster Management Network (PSDMN)

As a consortium of private sector organizations’ corporatesocial responsibility initiatives, PSDMN pledges to provide
voluntary disaster management and relief services to affected
communities. PSDMN hopes to further its cause of providing
effective disaster response as a corporate advocacy

g. Regional Emergency Assistance Communications Team(REACT)

As its name implies, the main objective of REACT is to provide
emergency assistance in every region of the country. To
achieve this, the volunteer members are required to beequipped with two way radios.
REACT membership represents cross sections of the society,diverse in their vocations, unified by a common goal to renderhumanitarian service. With 73 groups in 14 regions, REACT
now is considered as the largest civic communicationsorganization in the country. Its capability is supported with 6
ambulances, 5 fire trucks and 11 radio repeaters

h. Phil. Mine Safety and Environment Association andChamber of Mines of the Philippines
to contribute their technical skills and expertise, through the setting up of Safety
Networking Action Program-Emergency Response Teams (SNAP-ERTs) to OCD-NDCC
in times of emergencies and national disasters

i. DHL Asia Pacific

providing the NDCC a DHL DRT for technical advice free of charge on airport logistics
management to ensure uninterrupted and effective supply chain at the disaster site
airportj. Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines (PHAPCARES)
Foundation Inc.


a public and private partnerships as a strategy to better respond to the medical needs ofdisaster victims (Service and medicines free of charge)
PHAP through its Foundation coordinates the efforts of its members to provide
assistance for relief work in the aftermath of calamities, in cooperation with other nationalorganizations and projects of government agencies.

VIII.

Disaster Preparedness of Metro Manila Municipalities and Cities

The strict implementation of building, construction andzoning codes will help in terms of structural preparedness forbuildings. However,physical interventions such as
re-developmentandinvestments
inhazard-resistantinfrastructures are just two of the many aspects of disaster risk
reduction. Metro Manila is a case in point. As much as it isimportant to ensure the safety and integrity of infrastructures,trainings and capacity-building of stakeholders - local
government units and their constituents – need to translate toknowledge of what it is that must be done assuming the
projected magnitude hits the Philippines
The Metro Manila Mayors (Marikina City, Makati City,
Quezon City, Pasig City Taguig City, Pateros, Pasay City andMuntinlupa) together with their respective disaster preparedness
partners are continuously studying and revisiting their respective national framework for disasterrisk management. They provide programs, projects and activities on preparedness, mitigation,
operational response and recovery in emergency situations. They also ensure effective
coordination of resources and operatives to, during and after disasters.
IX. Conclusion:1.

It is very important to revisit the priority plan of action of the Metro Manila Earthquake Impact
Reduction Study Report. Since the study was conducted few years back, various parts ofMetro Manila have undergone rapid urban development since then, adding a significant
number of structures to the totals indicated in the report. Should an earthquake occur, there
is a possibility that actual casualties and damages will be higher than the estimates in the
study.

2.

The Local Government Units need to strictly adopt land-use planning/zoning and adherence
to the latest National Building Code of the Philippines. The political will of the mayors will not
only sustain the disaster management effort, but will also motivate support from the otherkey actors like the city/municipal council, the dedicated staff of the concerned departmentsof the government, private companies and NGOS. Urban preparedness and mitigation
requires the coordination of efforts by multiple agencies.

3.

There must be continuous efforts among the government and various stakeholders on
public awareness and preparedness. The local government need to establish a Disaster
Preparedness Education Center, where an Audio Visual/Training Room, a small
disaster management museum, and a disaster management library that can be used bychildren as well as adults. A Disaster Management Handbook that contains instructions
on how the public should prepare for emergencies, lists what to do during emergencies,
and other emergency information is essential in public information. This handbook
should be distributed to the residents and other community organizations.

4.

Capacity building and resource management in anticipation of potentially strong
earthquakes. The Local Government Units need to invest on the emergency equipment
which they can use during emergency situation. Volunteers / responders should
continuously undergo emergency training courses.

References































National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) - http://ndrrmc.gov.ph
Bill/Act “Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction, Management and Recovery Act of 2010”
Philippine Volcanology and Seismology – Department of Science and Technology(PHIVOLCS-DOST ) - http://www.phivolcs.dost.gov.phPhilippine Atmospheric and Geosciences Administration- DOST (PAGASA- DOST)http://www.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA) - http://www.namria.gov.phMines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) - http://www.mgb.gov. phwww.earthquakesandmegacities.org
Pacific Disaster Center - www.pdc.org/emi
Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) - www.mmda.gov.ph
Department of Education (DepEd) - www.deped.gov.ph
Department of Health - www.doh.gov.phCabinet Office, Government of Japan
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
Japan Agency for Marine Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)
Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC)
Japan Coast Guard
Kobe Prefecture Government
Kobe Fire Department
League of Municipalities and Cities, Philippines
Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) Canada
Association of Carriers and Equipment Leasers Inc. (ACEL)
Civil Defense Action Group Inc. (CDAG)
Task Force Disaster Mitigation, Adaptation & Preparedness Strategies (DMAPS)
Office on Muslim Affairs (OMA)
Private Sector Disaster Management Network (PSDMN)
Regional Emergency Assistance Communications Team (REACT)
Phil. Mine Safety and Environment Association and Chamber of Mines of the Philippines
DHL Asia PacificPharmaceutical and Healthcare Association of the Philippines (PHAPCARES) Foundation Inc.