㹔㸬ཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ
1. ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮
ᩍ
ᤵ
ㅮ
ᖌ
ຓ
ᩍ
◊✲ဨ
Ꮫ⏕

▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ୰ົ Ꮥᶫᮏᖾ⏨᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊబ⸨㥴୥ (ᅜ㝿ࢸࢽࣗ࢔ࢺࣛࢵࢡࠊ2019.5 ╔௵)ถࠊBharat Kumar (2019.6 ╔௵)኱Ꮫ㝔⏕ 3 ྡ

2. ᴫせᮏࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡛ࡣࠊ᰾Ꮚ(㝧Ꮚ࣭୰ᛶᏊ)ࡢከయ⣔࡛࠶ࡿཎᏊ᰾ࡸ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡢᵓ㐀࣭཯ᛂ࣭ᛂ⟅࡞࡝ࡢከ᰾Ꮚ㔞Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢ◊✲ࢆ᥎㐍ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᏳᐃ⥺㸦ࣁ࢖ࢮࣥ࣋ࣝࢢࡢ㇂㸧࠿ࡽ㞳ࢀࡓᨺᑕᛶ
࢔࢖ࢯࢺ࣮ࣉࡢཎᏊ᰾ࡢᵓ㐀࡜཯ᛂࠊ࢚࢟ࢰࢳࢵࢡ࡞ບ㉳≧ែࡢᛶ㉁ࠊᵝࠎ࡞㞟ᅋ㐠ືࡢⓎ⌧ᶵᵓ࡞࡝ࠊᮍゎỴࡢㅦࡢゎ᫂࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋཎᏊ᰾ࡢ◊✲ࡣࠊࣇ࢙࣑ࣝ⢏Ꮚࡢ㔞Ꮚከయ⣔ィ⟬࡜࠸࠺ほⅬ࡛ࠊ≀㉁⛉Ꮫࡸග⛉Ꮫࠊ෭༷ཎᏊ⣔ࡢ≀⌮࡜ᐦ᥋࡞ࡘ࡞ࡀࡾࢆࡶࡘࠋࡲࡓࠊࢡ࢛࣮ࢡ࣭ࢢࣝ
࣮࢜ࣥࡢࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿ᱁Ꮚ QCD ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ᰾ຊࡢィ⟬ࠊ㍍࠸ཎᏊ᰾ࡢ┤᥋ィ⟬࡞࡝ࡀ㐍ᒎࡍࡿ୰ࠊ⣲⢏Ꮚ≀⌮Ꮫ࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡶ㔜せᛶࡀቑࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀࡢゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜ
ࣀࣞࢫ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯࡢほ ᐇ㦂ࡸࠊ⣲⢏Ꮚᶆ‽ᶍᆺࡢࢸࢫࢺ࡟㛵ࢃࡿᐇ㦂࡞࡝࡟ࡶཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࡢ⢭ᐦィ⟬ࡀ୙ྍḞ࡜ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊඖ⣲ࡢ㉳※ࡸᫍࡢᵓ㐀ࠊ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡢㄌ⏕࡟ࡶ㛵ࢃࡿ⇿Ⓨⓗኳయ⌧㇟࡟ࡶཎᏊ᰾ࡢᛶ㉁ࡣ῝ࡃ㛵ࢃࡾࠊᏱᐂ≀⌮Ꮫ࡜ࡶᐦ᥋࡟㛵ಀࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡉࡽ࡟ࠊཎᏊຊᕤ
Ꮫศ㔝ࡸᛂ⏝ศ㔝࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡀ㔜せ࡟࡞ࡗ࡚ࡁ࡚࠾ࡾࠊᮏࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡶ⌮ㄽィ⟬᰾ࢹ࣮ࢱࡢᵓ⠏࡜ࡑࡢࢧ࣏࣮ࢺࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚ࡁ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ࣓ࣥࣂ࣮ࡣࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᖜᗈ࠸ㄢ㢟࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࡳࠊศ㔝ࡢᯟࢆ㉸࠼ࡓ◊✲ࢆ᥎㐍ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
ࡲࡓࠊࣇ࢙࣑ࣝከ⢏Ꮚ⣔࡜ࡋ࡚ཎᏊ᰾࡜ඹ㏻ࡍࡿせ⣲ࢆࡶࡘከ㟁Ꮚ⣔࡜ࡋ࡚ࡢ≀㉁⛉Ꮫ࡟㛵ࡋࠊ⌮ㄽ࡜ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ◊✲ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ≉࡟㧗ᙉᗘ࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ࣃࣝࢫග࡜≀㉁ࡢ┦஫స⏝࡛㉳ࡇࡿ㉸㧗㏿㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ◊✲ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊỗ⏝ࡢග⛉Ꮫ➨୍ཎ⌮ࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ SALMON ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡜ࡑࢀࢆᛂ⏝ࡋࡓ◊✲ࢆᒎ㛤ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
3. ◊✲ᡂᯝ
࠙1ࠚ ᗙᶆ✵㛫᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲࡢィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻ㛤Ⓨ࡜࢔࢖ࢯ࣋ࢡࢺࣝ㟁Ẽ཮ᴟᏊඹ㬆࡬ࡢᛂ⏝
㸦Shi㸦ࣁࣝࣅࣥᕤᴗ኱Ꮫ㸧ࠊ᪥㔝ཎࠊSchuetrumpf㸦GSI㸧㸧
ࣁࣝࣅࣥᕤᴗ኱Ꮫ࡛㛤Ⓨࡉࢀࡓ 3 ḟඖᗙᶆᇶᗏࡢཎᏊ᰾ᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻࢆᣑᙇࡋࠊ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲ(TDDFT)ィ⟬ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡟ࡋࡓࠋᇶᗏ≧ែ࡛ࡢᑐ┦㛵ࡣ BCS ㏆ఝ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ᑟධ
ࡋࠊ㌶㐨Ἴື㛵ᩘࡢ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᛶࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡗ࡚᫬㛫౫Ꮡࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫ࡬ࡢᐤ୚ࢆ㒊ศⓗ࡟ྲྀࡾ㎸ࡵࡿࡼ࠺࡟ᐇ⿦ࡋࡓࠋ᪂ࡋࡃసࡽࢀࡓ 3 ḟඖᗙᶆᇶᗏࡢ TDDFT ィ⟬ࢥ࣮ࢻࡣྠࡌ 3 ḟඖᗙᶆ✵㛫ᇶᗏࡢ Sky3D ࡟ࡼࡿ TDDFT ィ⟬࡜ࠊ㍈ᑐ⛠ࢆ௬ᐃࡋࡓㄪ࿴᣺ືᏊᇶᗏཎᏊ᰾ DFT ࢥ࣮ࢻ
HFBTHO ࡢ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲ࡟ࡼࡿ‽⢏Ꮚ஘㞧఩┦㏆ఝィ⟬࡜࣋ࣥࢳ࣐࣮ࢡࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋSky3D ࡜ࡢẚ㍑
࡛ࡣ࡯ࡰྠ୍ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆᚓࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ୍᪉࡛ HFBTHO ࡟ࡼࡿ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲࡢィ⟬⤖ᯝ࡜ࡢẚ㍑
࡛ࡣࠊᕧ኱ඹ㬆ࡢ࣓࢖ࣥࣆ࣮ࢡࡢ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣ୍⮴ࢆᚓࡓࡀࠊㄪ࿴᣺ືᏊᇶᗏ࡛ࡣ㐃⥆≧ែࢆṇࡋࡃ⾲⌧࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ࡇ࡜࠿ࡽ㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ഃ࡛ࡣᙉᗘ㛵ᩘ࡟㐪࠸ࡀぢࡽࢀࡓࠋZr, Mo, Ru ཎᏊ᰾ࡢ࢔࢖ࢯ࣋ࢡࢺࣝᆺ཮ᴟᏊᕧ኱ඹ㬆ࡢ⣔⤫ⓗィ⟬ࢆᏳᐃ᰾࠿ࡽ୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫᰾㡿ᇦࡲ࡛⾜࠸ࠊᇶᗏ≧ែኚᙧ࡜ᕧ኱ඹ㬆ࡢᙉᗘ㛵ᩘศᕸࡢ㛵㐃ࢆศᯒࡋࡓࠋ

- 103-

Fig. 1: TDDFT と有限振幅法による 24Mg の電気双極子強度関数の計算値の比較。

【2】 陽子過剰不安定核の基底状態でのアイソベクトル型中性子−陽子対凝縮（日野原、Sheikh（カシミア大）、Dobaczewski（ヨーク大）、Nazarewicz（ミシガン州立大））
調和振動子基底の原子核 DFT 計算コード HFBTHO にアイソベクトル型中性子−陽子対相関を導入し、陽子過剰不安定核の基底状態の計算を行った。縮退がある場合も安定して解が求められる
ように対振幅に対して拘束条件をかけ、アイソベクトル型中性子−陽子対振幅の関数としてエネル
ギー等の分析を行った。アイソスピン対称な原子核密度汎関数を用いた場合、N=Z となる原子核ではアイソベクトル対相関によって自発的にアイソスピン対称性が破れ、対振幅のアイソスピン空間での向きが異なる解が縮退するため、中性子対、陽子対、中性子−陽子対の混合凝縮解の縮退が実現する。そのため基底状態の記述ではアイソスピン射影が重要となる。
アイソベクトル型対相関の 3 つの結合定数を変えたり Coulomb 力を加えたりするとアイソスピ
ン対称性が破れ、この縮退は解ける。しかしながら Coulomb 力による対相関のアイソスピン対称性の破れの程度は非常に小さく、対相関チャネルではアイソスピン対称性は近似的に成立し、アイ
ソスピン回転の量子ゆらぎが非常に大きくなることが示され。N≠Z となる原子核ではアイソスピ
ン対称な密度汎関数ではアイソベクトル型中性子−陽子対凝縮は現れず、中性子−陽子対の結合定数が大きい場合に限り凝縮解を得ることができた。

Fig. 2: アイソベクトル型中性子−陽子対振幅の関数としてのエネルギー、同種粒子対振幅、アイソベクトル対振幅の大きさ。

- 104-

࠙3ࠚ ࢪࣝࢥࢽ࣒࢘ 90Zr ཎᏊ᰾ࡢ⾪✺཯ᛂ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ┦ᑐ఩┦ࡢຠᯝ㸦ᶫᮏࠊScamps㸦ࣈࣜࣗࢵࢭࣝ
⮬⏤኱㸧㸧᫖ᖺᗘࡲ࡛࡟࠾࠸࡚ࠊᡃࠎࡣ Gogny-TDHFB ἲࢆ⏝࠸࡚㉸ὶືཎᏊ᰾ࡢ཯ᛂ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ┦ᑐ఩┦ࡢຠᯝࢆㄪ࡭࡚ࡁࡓࠋࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࢥ࣮ࢻࡢᩚഛ࡜᪂ࡋ࠸ィ⟬ᢏ⾡ࡢ㛤Ⓨࡢࡓࡵ࡟ࠊᑐ㇟ࡣ㓟⣲ 20O
ࡸ࢝ࣝࢩ࣒࢘ Ca ࡞࡝ࡢẚ㍑ⓗ㉁㔞ࡢᑠࡉ࡞ཎᏊ᰾࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋ
ࡑࡇ࡛ࠊ࢘ࣛࢽ࣒࢘ࡸࣉࣝࢺࢽ࣒࢘࡞࡝ࡢ㔜࠸ཎᏊ᰾ࡢᛶ㉁ࠊ≉࡟ศ⿣ࡢ㐣⛬࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㉸ὶືࡢຠᯝࢆㄪ࡭ࡿࡓࡵ࡟ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛࡢᣑᙇ࡜ᩚഛࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚ࡁࡓࠋᛂ⏝ࢆጞࡵࡓ౛࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊࢪࣝࢥࢽ࣒࢘
90Zr ཎᏊ᰾ࡢṇ㠃⾪✺ࡢࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㉸ὶືᛶࡢຠᯝࡀ᰾㛫࣏ࢸࣥࢩࣕࣝࡢ㐪࠸ࡸᑐᛂࡍࡿ┦✵㛫ෆࡢ㌶㐨࡟⌧ࢀࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿ㸦Fig. 3 a㸧㸧ࠋࡲࡓࠊࣉࣝࢺࢽ࣒࢘ 240Pu ࡢศ⿣࡟క࠺࣏ࢸࣥࢩ࢚ࣕࣝࢿࣝࢠ࣮ࡢィ⟬࠿ࡽࠊᑐ⛠ᛶࢆಖࡗࡓᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧࡢศ⿣⤒㊰ࡼࡾࡶඵ㔜ᴟኚᙧࢆక࠺⤒㊰ࡢ࡯࠺ࡀࡼࡾప࠸࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮࡟࡞ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ☜ㄆ࡛ࡁࡿ㸦Fig. 3 b㸧㸧ࠋࡇࢀࡽࡢ㔜࠸ཎᏊ᰾ࢆᑐ㇟࡟ࡋ࡚㉸ὶືᛶ࡟క࠺఩┦ࡀཎᏊ᰾ෆࡢ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮⛣ື࡟ࡶࡓࡽࡍືⓗ࡞ຠᯝࢆㄪ࡭ࡿࡇ࡜
ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ

Fig. 3: a) 90Zr+90Zr ࡢ཯ᛂ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ┦✵㛫ෆࡢ㌶㐨ࠋຍ㏿࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮70 MeV㸦ᐇ⥺㸧࠾ࡼࡧ 84
MeVࠋ┦ᑐ఩┦ 0 ᗘ㸦Ⅼ⥺㸧࠾ࡼࡧ 90 ᗘ㸦◚⥺㸧ࠋᤄධᅗࡣᣑ኱ᅗࠋb) 240Pu ࡢᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧࢆᣊ᮰
᮲௳࡟ࡋࡓ HFB ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮᭤⥺ࠋᅄ㔜ᴟኚᙧࡢࡳ㸦ᐇ⥺㸧࡜ඵ㔜ᴟኚᙧ㸦ᤄධᅗ㸧࠶ࡾ㸦◚⥺㸧ࡢሙྜࠋ

࠙4ࠚ GW170817 constraints on the properties of a neutron star in the presence of WIMP dark
matter (Quddus (Aligarh Muslim University), Panotopoulos (IST), Kumar, Ahmad (Aligarh
Muslim University), and Patra (Homi Bhaba National Institute))
My colleagues and I have considered a relatively light Weakly Interacting Massive Particle(WIMP) as a dark matter candidate with properties suggested by the results of the
DAMA/LIBRA collaboration, realized for instance within the framework of the Next-to-Minimal
Supersymmetric Standard Model. The dark matter (DM) particle interacts with the baryonicmatter of a neutron star (NS) through Higgs bosons. The DM variables are essentially fixed using
the results of the DAMA/LIBRA experiment, which are then used to build the Lagrangiandensity for the WIMP-nucleon interaction inside a NS. We have used the effective field theory
motivated relativistic mean field (RMF) model to study the EoS in the presence of dark matter.
The predicted EoS are used in the TOV equations to obtain the mass-radius relations (see Fig.
4), the moment of inertia, and effects of the tidal field on a NS. The calculated properties arecompared with the corresponding data of the GW170817 event.

- 105-

Fig. 4: Mass-radius profile for NSs in the presence of DM.

࠙5ࠚ Effects of Dark Matter on Nuclear and Neutron Star Matter (Das (Homi Bhabha National
Institut_e), Kumar (Homi Bhabha National Institute), Kumar, Biswal (Xiamen University),
୰ົ, Li (Xiamen University), and Patra (Homi Bhabha National Institute))
We study the DM effects on the nuclear matter (NM) parameters characterising the EoS of
super dense neutron-rich nucleonic-matter. The observables of the NM, i.e. incompressibility,
symmetry energy and its higher order derivatives in the presence DM for symmetric andasymmetric NM, are analysed with the help of RMF model. The calculations are also extendedWRǃ-stable matter to explore the properties of the NS. We analyse the DM effects on symmetricNM, pure neutron matter and NS matter with the help of RMF model using NL3, G3 and IOPBI forces. The binding energy and pressure are calculated with and without considering the DM
interaction with the NM systems. The influences of DM are also analysed on the symmetryenergy and its different coefficients. The incompressibility and the skewness parameters areaffected considerably due to the presence of DM in the NM medium. We extend the calculations
to NS and find its mass, radius and the moment of inertia (see Fig. 5) for static and rotating NS
with and without DM contribution. The mass of the NS considerably changes due to rapid
rotation with the frequency in the mass-shedding limit. The effects of DM are found to beimportant for some of the NM parameters, which are crucial for the properties of astrophysicalobjects.

- 106-

Fig. 5: Moment of inertia of the NSs in the presence of DM.

࠙6ࠚ Calculations of the collective inertial mass and self-consistent reaction path for low-energy
nuclear reactions㸦 ࠊ୰ົ㸧
Towards the microscopic theoretical description for large amplitude collective dynamics likefusion/fission reactions, we propose a numerical method to determine the optimal collective
reaction path for nucleus-nucleus collisions, based on the adiabatic self-consistent collective
coordinate (ASCC) method. At the same time, we extracted the coefficients of inertial masses for
low-energy nuclear collective dynamics, which is the key ingredient for constructing the nuclear
collective Hamiltonian and study the quantum mechanical features of nuclear reactions.
Under the scheme of adiabatic self-consistent collective coordinate (ASCC), we use an iterative
method, combining the imaginary-time evolution and the finite amplitude method, for the
VROXWLRQRIWKH$6&&FRXSOHGHTXDWLRQV,WLVDSSOLHGWROLJKWUHDFWLRQV\VWHPVRIǂǂń8%Hǂ
162ń20Ne and 16O + 162ń32S. We determine the collective paths, the potentials, and the inertial
masses. The results are compared with other methods, such as the constrained Hartree-Fockmethod, Inglis's cranking formula.
The left panel on Fig. 6 shows the fusion path for the fusion reaction of 162  ǂ ń 20Ne,
constructed by the microscopically derived collective coordinate, which can be decoupled fromother intrinsic degrees of freedom. This fusion path smoothly connects the two reacting nuclei
into the ground state of 20Ne. The right panel shows the derived inertial mass for the same system,
the results are compared with other methods. When the two nuclei are far away from each other,
the reduced mass can be reproduced. We have demonstrated that the inertial mass calculated byour method is advantageous because it is self-consistent and not spoiled by the existence of thetime-odd mean-field potential in the realistic energy density functional. With these results, it
becomes feasible to perform ‘requantization’ of the TDHF(B), which will reveal more quantum
effects and microscopic information of nuclear fusion/fission reactions.

- 107-

Fig. 6: (Left) Density distribution on the x-z plane at four points on the ASCC fusion reaction
path of 162  ǂ ń 20Ne: (a) R = 7.6 fm, (b) R = 5.2 fm, (c) R = 4.2 fm, and (d) R = 3.8 fm
corresponding to the ground state of 20Ne. (Right) The ASCC inertial mass (red solid curve) inunits of the nucleon mass as a function of R for the same system, compared with the cranking
inertial masses based on the CHF states with constraint on octupole deformation. The nonperturbative and perturbative cranking inertial masses are shown with dotted and dashed lines,
respectively.

࠙7ࠚ ࢩࣇࢺ࣭ࢡࣜࣟࣇἲ࡟ࡼࡿ㸱ḟඖᗙᶆ✵㛫⾲⌧࡛ࡢ᭷㝈 ᗘࣁ࣮ࢺ࣮࣭ࣞࣇ࢛ࢵࢡ࣭࣎ࢦࣜࣗ
࣮࣎ࣇィ⟬㸦᯽ⴥ㸦D3㸧ࠊ୰ົ㸧ᑐจ⦰࡟ࡼࡿ᰾Ꮚ㉸ὶືᛶࢆ⪃៖࡛ࡁࡿ㸦᭷㝈 ᗘ㸧
ࣁ࣮ࢺ࣮࣭ࣞࣇ࢛ࢵࢡ࣭࣎ࢦ࣮ࣜࣗ࣎ࣇ㸦HFB㸧ィ⟬࡛ࡣࠊᑐ⛠ᛶࡢ௬ᐃࢆᑟධࡋ࡚㸰ḟඖ௨ୗࡢィ⟬࡟ไ㝈ࡍࡿࠊㄪ࿴᣺ືᏊᇶᗏࢆ⏝࠸࡚✵㛫ḟඖࢆᑠࡉࡃᢚ࠼ࡿ࡞࡝ࠊࣇࣝࡢ㠀ไ㝈ィ⟬ࡣ࡯࡜ࢇ࡝ⓙ↓࡛࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡑࡇ࡛ࠊ㸱ḟඖᗙᶆ✵㛫ࢆᇶᗏ࡟ྲྀࡗࡓ㸱ḟඖࢯࣝࣂ࣮ࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆᐇ᪋ࡋࡓࠋ㏻ᖖࡢ HFB ィ⟬࡛ࡣࠊ‽⢏Ꮚ㌶㐨ࢆồࡵࠊ㏻ᖖᐦ
ᗘ࣭ᑐᐦᗘࢆィ⟬ࡍࡿᡭἲࡀ᥇ࡽࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊHFB ࣁ࣑ࣝࢺࢽ࢔ࣥࡢᑐゅ໬సᴗࡀᚲせ࡜࡞ࡿࡓࡵࠊ
⮬ᕫ↓᧐╔࡞ゎ࡟฿㐩ࡍࡿࡲ࡛࡟኱ḟඖ⾜ิࡢᑐゅ໬ࢆఱᗘࡶᐇ⾜ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࠋࡑࡇ࡛ࠊࡇࡢ
⾜ิᑐゅ໬ࢆ㑊ࡅࡿ᪉ἲ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ」⣲࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㠃ୖ࡛ࡢࢢ࣮ࣜࣥ㛵ᩘࡢ✚ศ࠿ࡽ㏻ᖖᐦᗘ࣭ᑐᐦ
ᗘࢆィ⟬ࡋࠊࢢ࣮ࣜࣥ㛵ᩘࢆࢡࣜࣟࣇ࣭࢔ࣝࢦࣜࢬ࣒࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ཯᚟ゎἲ࡛ồࡵࡿ᪉ἲࢆ㛤Ⓨࡋࡓࠋ✚ศࡢࡓࡵ࡟ࡣࠊከᩘࡢ␗࡞ࡿ」⣲࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮࡛ࡢࢢ࣮ࣜࣥ㛵ᩘࢆィ⟬ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿࡀࠊࡇࡇ࡟
ࡣࢩࣇࢺἲࢆ⏝࠸ࡿࡇ࡜࡛ࠊ࡯ࡰ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮㸯Ⅼ࡛ࡢィ⟬ࢥࢫࢺ࡛඲࡚ࡢ࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮Ⅼࡢ⤖ᯝࢆᚓࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ␗࡞ࡿ✵㛫Ⅼ࡛ࡢィ⟬ࢆࠊ࡯࡜ࢇ࡝㏻ಙ࡞ࡋ࡟ᐇ⾜ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡓࡵࠊ

- 108-

୪ิ໬ຠ⋡ࡶ㠀ᖖ࡟㧗ࡃࠊOakforest-PACS ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓᩘ್ィ⟬ࢆᐇ⾜ࡋࡓࠋᩘ್ィ⟬ࡢ⤖ᯝ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ ᗘ࡟ࡼࡿཎᏊ᰾ࡢᙧ≧ኚ໬ࠊኚᙧඹᏑ⌧㇟ࡢ ᗘ౫Ꮡᛶ࡜Ᏻᐃᛶ࡟㛵ࡍࡿ⤖ᯝࢆᚓࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡓࠋ
ࡲࡓࠊ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡢෆẆ㸦࢖ࣥࢼ࣮࣭ࢡࣛࢫࢺ㸧࡟࠾࠸࡚ࠊ㸱ḟඖⓗࣃࢫࢱᵓ㐀ࢆࣇࣝ㸱ḟඖࡢ᭷㝈 ᗘ HFB ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿึࡵ
࡚ࡢゎᯒࢆᐇ᪋ࡋࡓࠋࡇࢀࡲ࡛
ணゝࡉࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠸᪂ࡋ࠸┦ࡀฟ⌧ࡍࡿྍ⬟ᛶࢆ♧၀ࡍࡿ⤖ᯝࢆᚓ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ

Fig. 7: ୰ᛶᏊᫍෆẆ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ᭷㝈 ᗘ࣭᭷㝈ᐦᗘࡢ࣮࣋ࢱ
ᖹ⾮≧ែ࡜ࡋ࡚ᚓࡽࢀࡓᵓ㐀ࠋ኱ࡁࡃኚᙧࡋࡓ Sr ࡢཎᏊ᰾ࡀ
ฟ⌧ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ

࠙8ࠚ 㑄⛣㔠ᒓ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢔ࢺ⛊㐣Ώ྾཰ศග࡜ගㄏ㉳㟁Ꮚᒁᅾ⌧㇟ࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬(బ⸨)ᡃࠎࡣࠊ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬࡜᭱ඛ➃ࡢ࢔ࢺ⛊ศගᐇ㦂ᢏ⾡ࢆ⤌ࡳྜࢃࡏࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡾࠊ
ගࡀㄏ㉳ࡍࡿ㉸㧗㏿࡞㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢᚤどⓗᶵᵓࡢゎ᫂࡟ྲྀࡾ⤌ࢇ࡛࠸ࡿࠋ
ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊࢳ࣮ࣗࣜࢵࣄᕤ⛉኱ࡢ࢔ࢺ⛊ᐇ㦂ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜ࡢඹྠ◊✲࡟ࡼࡾࠊ㏆㉥እࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ࢆࢳࢱࣥⷧ⭷࡟↷ᑕࡋࡓ㝿࡟ㄏ㉳ࡉࢀࡿᅛయ୰ࡢ㉸㧗㏿࡞㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ㄪ࡭ࡓࠋ
ᐇ㦂ⓗ࡟ࡣࠊ㉥እࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ࢆ࣏ࣥࣉගࠊᴟ⣸እ࢔ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ࢆࣉ࣮ࣟࣈග࡜ࡋࡓ࢔ࢺ
⛊㐣Ώ྾཰ศගᐇ㦂ࡀࢳࢱࣥⷧ⭷࡟ᑐࡋ࡚⾜࠸ࠊࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮↷ᑕ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㔠ᒓࢳࢱࣥࡢ M྾཰➃(࠾ࡼࡑ 32 eV)࡟࠾ࡅࡿ྾ගᗘࡀࢧࣈࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊ࡢ᫬㛫ࢫࢣ࣮࡛ࣝቑ኱ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡜
࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡇࡢ㉸㧗㏿࡞㔠ᒓࢳࢱࣥࡢගᏛ≉ᛶࡢኚㄪࡢᚤどⓗᶵᵓࢆゎ᫂ࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ➨୍ཎ⌮㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫᕢィ⟬࡟ࡼࡾୖグࡢ࢔ࢺ⛊࣏ࣥࣉ࣭ࣉ࣮ࣟࣈᐇ㦂ࢆ┤᥋ࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࡋࡓࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊFig. 8 ࡟♧ࡍࡼ࠺࡟ࠊ࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ບ㉳࡟ࡼࡗ࡚ࢳࢱࣥཎᏊࡢ࿘
ࡾ࡟㟁Ꮚࡀᒁᅾ໬ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡜࡞ࡗࡓࠋࡉࡽ࡟ࠊ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽィ⟬ࡢ⤖ᯝࢆᚤどⓗ࡟ゎᯒࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛ࠊᐇ㦂ⓗ࡟ほ ࡉࢀࡓ M ྾཰➃࡟࠾ࡅࡿ྾ගᗘࡢቑ኱ࡣࠊࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ບ㉳ࡀᘬࡁ㉳ࡇࡍ㟁Ꮚࡢᒁᅾ໬࡟ࡼࡾ≀㉁ෆࡢ㐽ⶸຠᯝ(local field effect)ࡀኚㄪࡉࢀࡓࡇ࡜࡟㉳ᅉࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ᫂ࡽ࠿࡜࡞ࡗࡓࠋ

- 109-

ࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ග࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㟁Ꮚࡢᒁᅾᛶࠊཬࡧ≀㉁ෆࡢ㐽ⶸຠᯝࢆไᚚࡍࡿᢏ⾡ࡣࠊᑗ᮶ࡢග࡟ࡼࡿ
≀ᛶไᚚࢆᐇ⌧ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡢᇶ┙࡜࡞ࡿࡶࡢ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᮏඹྠ◊✲ࡢᡂᯝࡣࠊㄽᩥ"Attosecond
screening dynamics mediated by electron localization in transition metals"࡜ࡋ࡚ Nature Physics
ࡼࡾⓎ⾲ࡉࢀࡓࠋ

Fig. 8: ࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮↷ᑕ࡟ࡼࡿ㟁Ꮚᐦᗘኚ໬ࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢࢫࢼࢵࣉࢩࣙࢵࢺࠋᗙᶆཎⅬ࡟ࢳࢱࣥཎᏊࡀ఩⨨ࡍࡿࠋᅗୖࡢ᫬้ࡣࣇ࢙࣒ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ࣃࣝࢫࡢࣆ࣮ࢡᙉᗘ᫬้࠿ࡽࡢᕪࢆ⾲ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ࣮ࣞࢨ࣮↷ᑕ୰ࡢ㟁ሙࡣ㉥▮༳࡟ࡼࡗ࡚♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ࣮ࣞࢨ࣮↷ᑕ୰ࡣ㟁ሙ࡟ࡼࡾ㟁Ꮚᐦᗘ࡟೫ࡾࡀ⏕ࡌࠊྠ᫬࡟࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ບ㉳࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㟁ᏊࡀࢳࢱࣥཎᏊ௜㏆࡟ᒁᅾ໬ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ
ᵝᏊࡀ♧ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
࠙9ࠚ ග≀㉁⛉Ꮫศ㔝ࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ SALMON ࡢ㛤Ⓨ㸦▮ⰼࠊ᳜ᮏࠊబ⸨ࠊ➉ෆࠊ㔝⏣ࠊᘅᕝࠊᒣ⏣(⠜)ࠊᒣ⏣(ಇ)ࠊᮔ[㧗ᛶ⬟ィ⟬ࢩࢫࢸ࣒◊✲㒊㛛] 㸧ࣃࣝࢫග࡜ከᵝ࡞≀㉁ࡢ┦஫స⏝ࢆࠊ≀㉁⛉Ꮫࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ᡭἲࡢ୍ࡘ࡛࠶ࡿ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡁグ㏙ࡍࡿỗ⏝ࡢࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ SALMON (Scalable Ab initio Light-Matter
simulator for Optics and Nanoscience) ࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋSALMON ࡣࠊศᏊࡢศᴟ⋡ࡸ≀㉁ࡢㄏ㟁㛵ᩘࡢࡼ࠺࡞ගᛂ⟅㛵ᩘ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟ࠊࣃࣝࢫගࢆ↷ᑕࡋࡓ≀㉁ෆ࡛㉳ࡇࡿ㉸㧗㏿⌧㇟ࢆ᫬㛫㡿ᇦ࡛ィ⟬ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࠊඛ➃ࡢඛ➃ࡢග⛉Ꮫᐇ㦂ࢆ୸ࡈ࡜ࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠊ
௚࡟౛ࡢ࡞࠸≉ᚩࢆᣢࡘࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔࡛࠶ࡿࠋ⌧ᅾ࢙࢘ࣈ࣮࣌ࢪ https://salmon-tddft.jp ࢆᩚഛࡋබ㛤ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋᮏᖺᗘࡣࠊSALMON ࡢᇶ┙࡜࡞ࡿࢥ࣮ࢻࡢᢤᮏⓗ࡞ᨵⰋࢆ⾜࠸ࠊࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥ 2 ࡢබ㛤ࢆ┠ᣦࡍάື࡟ከࡃࡢ᫬㛫ࢆ㈝ࡸࡋࡓࠋ2020 ᖺᗘࡢ๓༙࡟ࡣ᪂ࣂ࣮ࢪࣙࣥࡢබ㛤ࢆணᐃࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ
SALMON ࢆᬑཬࡍࡿάື࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ㸷᭶࡟኱㜰኱Ꮫࡀᐇ᪋ࡍࡿࢥࣥࣆࣗࢸ࣮ࢩࣙࢼ࣭࣐ࣝࢸࣜ࢔
ࣝࢬ࣭ࢹࢨ࢖࣮ࣥ࣡ࢡࢩࣙࢵࣉ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࠊࡲࡓ 11 ᭶࡟ࡣ RIST ࡢࢧ࣏࣮ࢺࡢࡶ࡜ᮾ໭኱Ꮫࢧ࢖ࣂ
࣮࣓ࢹ࢕࢔ࢭࣥࢱ࣮࡟࠾࠸࡚ࣁࣥࢬ࢜ࣥࢳ࣮ࣗࢺࣜ࢔ࣝࢆᐇ᪋ࡍࡿ࡞࡝ࡋࡓࠋ
࠙10ࠚ ᐩᓅ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ SALMON ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ኱つᶍࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ㸦ᘅᕝࠊᒣ⏣㸦⠜㸧ࠊᒣ⏣㸦ಇ㸧ࠊ㔝⏣ࠊ᳜ᮏࠊ▮ⰼࠊᮔ[㧗ᛶ⬟ィ⟬ࢩࢫࢸ࣒◊✲㒊㛛] 㸧⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮㸦⌮◊ R-CCS㸧࡛㛤Ⓨࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿᐩᓅ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࠊ኱つᶍィ⟬ࢆ⾜࠺‽ഛࢆ㐍ࡵࠊ10,000 ཎᏊࢆ㉸࠼ࡿࢧ࢖ࢬࡢ⣔ࡀࠊᐩᓅ࡟࠾࠸࡚㧗࠸ຠ⋡࡛ィ⟬࡛ࡁࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ
☜࠿ࡵࡓࠋᩥ㒊⛉Ꮫ┬ࡼࡾເ㞟ࡢ࠶ࡗࡓࠊࢦ࣮ࢻࣥ࣋ࣝ㈹࡬ࡢ࢚ࣥࢺ࣮ࣜ࡟ࡴࡅࡓᐩᓅࡢヨ㦂฼⏝࡟᥇ᢥࡉࢀࠊᐩᓅࡢ࠾ࡼࡑ 1/6 ࡢࢩࢫࢸ࣒࡛࠶ࡿ 27,648 ࣀ࣮ࢻࡲ࡛ࢆ⏝࠸࡚ィ⟬ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋFig. 9- 110-

Fig.9㸸ᐩᓅ࡟࠾࠸࡚⾜ࡗࡓ࢞ࣛࢫ࡟ࣃࣝࢫගࢆ↷ᑕࡋࡓ㝿࡟㉳ࡇࡿග࣭㟁Ꮚ࣭࢖࢜ࣥࡢࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞ
ࢩࣙࣥࠋ(a)ࡣࢩࢫࢸ࣒ࡢᴫせࠊ(b)ࡣᇶᗏ≧ែ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㟁Ꮚᐦᗘศᕸࠊ(c)ࡣࣃࣝࢫࡀ↷ᑕ୰ࡢ㟁Ꮚᐦᗘࡢኚ໬ࡍࡿᵝᏊࠋ࡟ࠊ⾜ࡗࡓィ⟬ࡢᴫせࢆ♧ࡍࠋ⾲㠃ࢆỈ⣲⤊➃ࡋࡓ 10,224 ཎᏊ࠿ࡽ࡞ࡿ࢔ࣔࣝࣇ࢓ࢫ≧ࡢ SiO2 ࡢ࢞ࣛࢫⷧ⭷࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊග㟁☢ሙ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ࣐ࢡࢫ࢙࢘ࣝ᪉⛬ᘧࠊ㟁Ꮚ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ᫬㛫౫Ꮡ Kohn-Sham᪉⛬ᘧࠊ࢖࢜ࣥ࡟ᑐࡍࡿࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣥࡢ㐠ື᪉⛬ᘧࢆྠ᫬࡟ゎࡁࠊࣃࣝࢫ↷ᑕᚋࡢ㉸㧗㏿ࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡ
ࢫ࡟ᑐࡍࡿィ⟬ࡀᐇ⾜ྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆᐇドࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊ13,632 ཎᏊࡲ࡛ࡢ⣔࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊ
weak/strong ࢫࢣ࣮ࣜࣥࢢࡢᛶ⬟ࢆㄪ࡭ࠊࢥ࣮ࢻࡢࢳ࣮ࣗࢽࣥࢢ࡟ࡼࡾࠊ
ᐩᓅ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ Byte/FLOPS್࠿ࡽண᝿ࡉࢀࡿ㝈⏺࡟㏆࠸ᛶ⬟࡛ィ⟬ࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࡇ࡜ࢆ♧ࡋࡓࠋ
࠙11ࠚ ග࣭㟁Ꮚ࣭ࣇ࢛ࣀࣥࡢ┦஫స⏝ࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࡢᒎ㛤㸦ᒣ⏣㸦⠜㸧ࠊ▮ⰼ㸧ࡇࢀࡲ࡛࡟ SALMON 㛤Ⓨࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺࢆ㏻ࡌࠊග࣭㟁Ꮚ࣭ཎᏊ㸦࢖࢜ࣥ㸧ࡢ୕⪅ࡢ㐠ື᪉⛬ᘧࢆ➨୍ཎ⌮࡛࣐ࣞ࣋ࣝࣝࢳࢫࢣ࣮ࣝࣔࢹࣝ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡁ⤫୍ⓗ࡟グ㏙ࡍࡿ Maxwell + TDDFT + MD ἲࢆ㛤Ⓨࡋ࡚ࡁࡓ[1]ࠋ≉࡟ࣇ࢙࣒࡜⛊ࣃࣝࢫ࡟ࡼࡾㄏ㉳ࡉࢀࡿ▐㛫ㄏᑟ࣐ࣛࣥᩓ஘࠾ࡼࡧࢥࣄ࣮ࣞࣥ
ࢺࣇ࢛ࣀࣥࡢ࣏ࣥࣉ㸫ࣉ࣮ࣟࣈศගࡢヲ⣽࡞ゎᯒࢆ㐍ࡵࡓ[2]ࠋ௒ᖺᗘࡣࡉࡽ࡟ࠊࣇ࢛ࣀࣥࡢ඾ᆺⓗ࡞᫬㛫ࢫࢣ࣮ࣝ㸦ࣆࢥ⛊㸧࡛ࡢグ㏙ࢆྍ⬟࡟ࡍࡿࡓࡵࠊᮏィ⟬ᡭἲࡢᯟ⤌ࡳࢆィ⟬໬Ꮫศ㔝࡟࠾ࡅࡿศᏊຊሙࣔࢹࣝ࡬ᛂ⏝ࡋࡓ᪂つィ⟬ᡭἲࠊࡍ࡞ࢃࡕࠊගࡢ㐠ື࡜ศᏊືຊᏛ࡜ࢆ⤫ྜࡋࡓMaxwell + ศᴟຊሙ MD ἲࠊࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡟╔ᡭࡋࡓ[3]ࠋࡇࢀࡣࠊMaxwell ᪉⛬ᘧ࡟ᚑࡗࡓග㟁☢Ἴ࡜ࠊᅛయ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㟁ᏊศᴟࢆྲྀࡾධࢀࡓศᏊࡢ㐠ື࡜ࢆ㐃❧ࡉࡏࠊ᫬㛫㡿ᇦࡢ┦஫స⏝ࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿィ⟬ᡭἲ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ᭱ึࡢᩘ್ィ⟬౛࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊịࡢⷧ⭷࡟ᑐࡍࡿ( I )ྍどගࡢ㏱㐣࡜཯ᑕࠊ(II) ㉥እ྾཰
ᐃࠊ(III) ㄏᑟ࣐ࣛࣥᩓ஘ ᐃࠊࡢࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋࡇࢀࡽࡣගࡢධᑕࠊⷧ⭷୰ࡢගࡢఏ
ᦙࠊග—ศᏊ┦஫స⏝࡟ࡼࡾ⏕ࡌࡿศᏊ᣺ື࡜ගࡢኚㄪࠊࢩࢢࢼࣝィ ࠊ࡜࠸ࡗࡓ୍㐃ࡢᐇ㦂ࣉࣟࢭࢫࢆᶍೌࡋ࡚෌⌧ࡋࡓィ⟬࡛࠶ࡿࠋ ᐃࣉࣟࢭࢫ࡟࠾ࡅࡿග࡜ศᏊࡢ㐠ືࡢヲ⣽ࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡍࡿ࡜
ྠ᫬࡟ᐇ㦂 ᐃ࡜ࡼࡃ୍⮴ࡍࡿࢩࢢࢼࣝࡀᚓࡽࢀࠊ᪂つᡭἲࡢ᭷ຠᛶࢆᐇドࡋࡓࠋ

- 111-

Fig. 10㸸Maxwell + ศᴟຊሙ MD ࣐ࣝࢳࢫࢣ࣮ࣝࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥἲࡢᴫ␎ᅗ
࠙12ࠚ ࢼࣀⷧ⭷࡜ࣃࣝࢫගࡢ┦஫స⏝ࢆグ㏙ࡍࡿ༢୍✵㛫᱁Ꮚࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ࣐ࢡࢫ࢙࢘ࣝ᪉⛬ᘧ࡜᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘἲࡢ⤫ྜࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ(ᒣ⏣㸦ಇ㸧ࠊ▮ⰼ)ⷧ⭷࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼⓎ⏕ࡸ㠀⇕ⓗ࡞࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ຍᕤࡢࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࡣࠊ⌮Ꮫ࣭⏘ᴗ୧㠃࠿ࡽ⯆࿡࠶ࡿ◊✲ࢸ࣮࣐࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡋ࠿ࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊ2 ḟඖ≀㉁➼ࡢᴟࡵ࡚ⷧ࠸ⷧ⭷࡟࠾ࡅࡿග࣭㟁Ꮚ┦஫స⏝ࢆ⪃࠼ࡿሙྜࠊ┦஫స⏝㡿ᇦࡀᴟ➃࡟⊃࠸ࡓࡵࠊୖグࡢࡼ࠺࡞㟁Ꮚ⣔࡜ග㟁☢ሙࡢ✵㛫ࢫࢣ࣮ࣝࢆศ㞳ࡍࡿ࣐ࣝࢳࢫࢣ࣮ࣝⓗ࡞グ㏙ࡣ㐺ᙜ࡛࡞࠸ࠋࡑࡇ࡛ᡃࠎࡣࠊ༢୍ࡢ✵㛫ࢫࢣ࣮࡛ࣝ㟁Ꮚ⣔࡜㟁☢ሙࢆ⤖ྜࡍࡿ᪂ࡓ࡞ᡭἲࡢ㛤Ⓨࢆ㐍ࡵ࡚ࡁࡓࠋᮏᡭἲࡣࠊග㟁☢ሙࡢࡓࡵࡢᚤどⓗ
Maxwell ᪉⛬ᘧ࡜㟁Ꮚ⣔ࡢࡓࡵࡢ᫬㛫౫Ꮡ Kohn-Sham ᪉⛬ᘧࢆ⤖ྜࡋࠊඹ㏻ࡢᐇ✵㛫ࢢࣜࢵࢻୖ
࡛ྠ᫬࡟᫬㛫Ⓨᒎࡉࡏࡿ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ἲ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ
௒ᖺᗘࡣᮏᡭἲࡢᛂ⏝࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊⷧ⭷ࡢ㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼⓎ⏕ࡢィ⟬ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋᅛయⷧ⭷࡟㧗ᙉᗘࣃࣝࢫ
ගࢆ↷ᑕࡋࡓ㝿࡟ほ ࡉࢀࡿ㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼࡣࠊⷧ⭷୰࡟࠾ࡅࡿගఏᦙࡢຠᯝ࡟ࡼࡾࠊࣂࣝࢡ୰ࡢᚤどⓗ࡞㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼⓎ⏕㸦HHG㸧ࡢಙྕ࠿ࡽ኱ࡁࡃኚㄪࢆཷࡅࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊᴟࡵ࡚ⷧ࠸ⷧ⭷࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣ㔞Ꮚ㛢ࡌ㎸ࡵຠᯝ࠶ࡿ࠸ࡣ⾲㠃ຠᯝ࡟ࡼࡿ HHG ࡢኚㄪࡀ㢧ⴭ࡟࡞ࡿ࡜⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡓࡵࠊⷧ⭷࡟࠾ࡅࡿ HHG ࡢໟᣓⓗ࡞⌮ゎࡢࡓࡵ࡟ࡣࠊⷧ⭷ࡢᚤどⓗᛶ㉁࡜ගఏ᧛ຠᯝࢆྠ᫬࡟ྲྀࡾᢅ࠺ࡇ࡜
ࡢ࡛ࡁࡿᮏᡭἲࢆ⏝࠸࡚ࠊᐇ㝿࡟୧⪅ࡀ HHG ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚࡝ࡢࡼ࠺࡞ᙳ㡪ࢆࡶࡓࡽࡍࡢ࠿ࢆศᯒࡍࡿ
ࡇ࡜ࡀ᭷⏝࡛࠶ࡿࠋ

Fig. 11: Si ⷧ⭷㸦ཌࡉ d㸧࡟࠾ࡅࡿග᣺ືᩘ 1.5 eV ࡢධᑕග࡟ᑐࡍࡿ཯ᑕ HHG(ᕥ)࠾ࡼࡧ㏱㐣
HHG(ྑ)ࡢ⭷ཌ౫Ꮡᛶ࠙13ࠚ ࢧࣈ nm ࢠࣕࢵࣉࢆᣢࡘࣉࣛࢬࣔࢽࢵࢡ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢගᛂ⟅㸦➉ෆࠊ▮ⰼ㸧㔠ᒓࢼࣀ⢏Ꮚࢆ஧ḟඖⓗ࡟࿘ᮇ㓄ิࡋࡓⷧ⭷࡛࠶ࡿ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡣࠊ⢏Ꮚࡢ⣲ᮦ࣭ᙧ≧࠿ࡽỴࡲࡿ≉␗࠿ࡘᖜᗈ࠸ග≀ᛶࢆⓎ⌧ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡛▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ≉࡟ࠊ㏆ᖺ࡛ࡣ㔠ᒓࢼࣀ⢏Ꮚ㛫㊥㞳(ࢠࣕࢵࣉ)- 112-

ࡀ 1nm ᮍ‶ࡢ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࢆ⮬ᕫ⤌⧊໬࡟ࡼࡾᏳᐃ࠿ࡘ኱㠃✚࡟సᡂ࡛ࡁࡿ᪉ἲࡀ☜❧ࡋࠊᇶ♏⛉Ꮫⓗ࡟ࡶᛂ⏝ⓗ࡟ࡶὀ┠ࢆ㞟ࡵ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࡢࡼ࠺࡞ࢧࣈ nm 㡿ᇦ࡛ࡣ㔞Ꮚຠᯝ࡟⏤᮶ࡍࡿ㟁Ꮚ㍺㏦ࡀ
⌧ࢀග≀ᛶࡀ኱ࡁࡃኚືࡍࡿࡀࠊ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢሙྜ࡟㟁Ꮚ㍺㏦ࡀ࡝ࢀ࡯࡝ᙳ㡪ࢆཬࡰࡍ࠿ࡣ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸࡞࠿ࡗࡓࠋ
ࡑࡇ࡛ᡃࠎࡣ SALMON ࢆ⏝࠸ࠊ㟁Ꮚ㍺㏦ࡀ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢග≀ᛶ࡟ཬࡰࡍᙳ㡪ࢆ᫂ࡽ࠿࡟ࡋࡓࠋ
Fig.
12 ࡣ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢග྾཰⋡࡟ᑐࡍࡿࢠࣕࢵࣉ౫Ꮡᛶࢆ♧ࡍࠋ(a)ࡣ㔞Ꮚຠᯝࢆ⪃៖ࡋ࡞࠸ᚑ᮶ࡢྂ඾
㟁☢ẼᏛィ⟬࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡾࠊ(b)ࡣ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡇࡢ⤖ᯝࡼࡾࠊ୧⪅ࡣࢠࣕࢵࣉ 0.2nm ௜㏆ࡲ࡛ࡣᴫࡡ୍⮴ࡍࡿࡶࡢࡢࠊࡼࡾ▷࠸ࢠࣕࢵࣉ㡿ᇦ࡛ࡣ኱ࡁ࡞㐪࠸ࡀ⾲ࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋࡇࢀࡣ(b)࡛ࡣࡇࡢ㡿ᇦ࠿ࡽ㟁Ꮚ㍺㏦ࡢຠᯝࡀ⌧ࢀࠊ㔠ᒓࢼࣀ⢏Ꮚ࡟ບ㉳ࡋࡓࣉࣛࢬࣔࣥࡀῶ⾶ࡋࡓࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋ

(a)

3.5

Φϋϩάʖ߱ [eV]Φϋϩάʖ߱ [eV]

3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1

Classical
0

0.5

1

1.5

0.35

3
2.5
2
1.5
1

2

(b)

TDDFT
0

0.5

1

1.5

άϡρϕ ݀ [nm]άϡρϕ ݀ [nm]20Fig. 12: ග྾཰⋡ࡢẚ㍑
4. ᩍ⫱
Ꮫ఩
㞟୰ㅮ⩏
5. ཷ㈹ࠊእ㒊㈨㔠ࠊ▱ⓗ㈈⏘➼ཷ㈹1.

➨ 14 ᅇ(2020 ᖺ) ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍ ⱝᡭዡບ㈹ࠊబ⸨㥴୥.

2.

Asian Nuclear Physics Association & AAPPS-DNP Award for young scientist, Kai Wen, Aug. 27,
2019.
እ㒊㈨㔠

1.

JST CRESTࠕග࣭㟁Ꮚ⼥ྜ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡜ᛂ⏝ࠖࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2016-2021
ᖺᗘࠊ37,650,000 ෇㸦2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧.

2.

࣏ࢫࢺி㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟㸵ࠕḟୡ௦ࡢ⏘ᴗࢆᨭ࠼ࡿ᪂ᶵ⬟ࢹࣂ࢖ࢫ࣭㧗ᛶ⬟ᮦᩱࡢ๰ᡂࠖࢧࣈㄢ㢟 Bࠕග࣭㟁Ꮚ⼥ྜࢹࣂ࢖ࢫࠖ
ࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊศᢸࠊ2016-2019 ᖺᗘࠊ14,373,000 ෇㸦2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧.

3.

Q-LEAP ඛ➃࣮ࣞࢨ࣮࢖ࣀ࣮࣋ࢩࣙࣥᣐⅬ ࠕḟୡ௦࢔ࢺ⛊࣮ࣞࢨ࣮ග※࡜ඛ➃ィ ᢏ⾡ࡢ㛤Ⓨࠖࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊศᢸࠊ2,174,000 ෇㸦2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧.

4.

⛉Ꮫᢏ⾡᣺⯆ᶵᵓࠊA-STEPࠕ࢔࢖ࢭ࣮ࣇἼ㛗⏝㧗ຠ⋡ Si ཷගࢭࣥࢧࡢ㛤Ⓨࠖࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊศᢸࠊ
2019 ᖺᗘࠊ250,000 ෇㸦2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧.

5.

ඹྠ◊✲⤒㈝ࠊᰴᘧ఍♫ఫ཭㔠ᒓ㖔ᒣࠊࠕࢼࣀ⢏Ꮚࡢගᛂ⟅㸭ගไᚚࠖࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ909,000 ෇㸦2019- 113-

ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧.
6.

᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭ᇶ┙◊✲(B)ࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2018 – 2021 ᖺࠊ4,200,000 ෇㸦2019ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ㉸୪ิࢯࣝࣂࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡜ཎᏊ᰾࠿ࡽ୰ᛶᏊᫍࡲ࡛ࡢ⤫୍ⓗ㧗⢭ᗘィ⟬ࠖ.

7.

᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭᪂Ꮫ⾡㡿ᇦ◊✲(◊✲㡿ᇦᥦ᱌ᆺ㸸◊✲㡿ᇦࠕ㔞Ꮚࢡࣛࢫࢱ࣮࡛ㄞࡳゎࡃ≀㉁ࡢ㝵ᒙᵓ㐀ࠖ)(බເ◊✲)ࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2019 – 2020 ᖺࠊ1,100,000 ෇ (2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝)ࠕ㔞Ꮚࢡࣛࢫࢱ࣮ฟ⌧ᶵᵓ࡜ప࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮᰾཯ᛂࡢ㠀⤒㦂ⓗグ㏙ࠖ.

8.

᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍஧ᅜ㛫༠ຊ஦ᴗ㸦JSPS-NSFC㸧ࠊ୰ົ Ꮥࠊ᪥ᮏഃ௦⾲ࠊ2017 – 2019 ᖺࠊ1,500,000
෇㸦2019 ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕr ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢㅦゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓ᰾㉁㔞࡜ᑑ࿨ࡢ◊✲ࠖ.

9.

᪥ᮏᏛ⾡᣺⯆఍⛉Ꮫ◊✲㈝࣭ⱝᡭ◊✲(B)ࠊ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ௦⾲ࠊ2016 – 2019 ᖺࠊ600,000 ෇㸦2019ᖺᗘ┤᥋⤒㈝㸧ࠊࠕ୰ᛶᏊ–㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵࣭ᑐจ⦰ࡢゎ᫂ࠖ.

6. ◊✲ᴗ⦼
(1) ◊✲ㄽᩥA) ᰝㄞ௜ࡁㄽᩥ
1.

S. Yamada, K. Yabana, “Symmetry properties of attosecond transient absorption spectroscopy incrystalline dielectrics”, Phys. Rev. B 101, 165128 (2020).

2.

T. Yatsui, S. Okada, T. Takemori, T. Sato, K. Saichi, T. Ogamoto, S. Chiashi, S. Maruyama, M.
Noda, K. Yabana, K. Iida and K. Nobusada, “Enhanced photo-sensitivity in a Si photodetector
using a near-ÀHOGDVVLVWHGH[FLWDWLRQ”, Communication Physics 2, 62 (2019).

3.

A. Yamada and K. Yabana, “Energy transfer from intense laser pulse to dielectrics in timedependent density functional theory”, Euro. Phys. J. D 73, 87 (2019).

4.

A. Yamada and K. Yabana, “Multiscale time-GHSHQGHQWGHQVLW\IXQFWLRQDOWKHRU\IRUDXQLÀHG
description of ultrafast dynamics: Pulsed light, electron, and lattice motions in crystalline solids”,
Phys. Rev. B 99, 245103 (2019).

5.

T. Takeuchi, M. Noda, and K. Yabana, “Operation of quantum plasmonic metasurfaces using
electron transport through subnanometer gaps”, ACS Photonics 6, 2517 (2019).

6.

I. Floss, C. Lemell, K. Yabana, and J. Burgdörfer, “Incorporating decoherence into solid-statetime-dependent density functional theory”, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224301 (2019).

7.

Y. Kashiwaba, T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent band calculation of slab phase in neutron-starcrust”, Phys. Rev. C 100, 035804 (2019).

8.

K. Wen and T. Nakatsukasa, “Collective inertial masses in nuclear reactions”, Front. Phys. 8, 16

9.

G. Scamps and Y. Hashimoto, “Density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov(2020) [Invited paper].
method”, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024623 (2019).
10. N. Hinohara, “Energy-weighted sum rule for nuclear density functional theory”, Phys. Rev. C 100,024310 (2019).
11. Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean, Micael J. T. Oliveira, Xavier Andrade, Heiko Appel, Carlos H. Borca,
Guillaume Le Breton, Florian Buchholz, Alberto Castro, Stefano Corni, Alfredo A. Correa,
Umberto De Giovannini, Alain Delgado, Florian G. Eich, Johannes Flick, Gabriel Gil, AdriánGomez, Nicole Helbig, Hannes Hübener, René Jestädt, Joaquim Jornet-Somoza, Ask H. Larsen,
Irina V. Lebedeva, Martin Lüders, Miguel A. L. Marques, Sebastian T. Ohlmann, Silvio Pipolo,
Markus Rampp, Carlo A. Rozzi, David A. Strubbe, Shunsuke A. Sato, Christian Schäfer, Iris
Theophilou, Alicia Welden, Angel Rubio, “Octopus, a computational framework for exploring- 114-

light-driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems”, J. Chem. Phys.
152, 124119 (2020).
12. Matteo Lucchini, Shunsuke A. Sato, Fabian Schlaepfer, Kazuhiro Yabana, Lukas Gallmann,
Angel Rubio, Ursula Keller, “Attosecond timing of the dynamical Franz–Keldysh effect”, J. Phys.
Photonics 2, 025001 (2020).
13. Shunsuke A. Sato, Angel Rubio, “Exact exchange-correlation potential of effectively interacting
Kohn-Sham systems”, Phys. Rev. A 101, 012510 (2020).
14. Shunsuke A. Sato, “Photovoltaic Effect from the Viewpoint of Time-reversal Symmetry”, J. Phys.
Soc. Jpn. 88, 115003 (2019).
15. S. A. Sato, P. Tang, M. A. Sentef, U. De Giovannini, H. Hübener, A. Rubio, “Light-induced
anomalous Hall effect in massless Dirac fermion systems and topological insulators with
dissipation”, New J. Phys. 21, 093005 (2019).
16. M. Volkov, S. A. Sato, F. Schlaepfer, L. Kasmi, N. Hartmann, M. Lucchini, L. Gallmann, A. Rubio,
U. Keller, “Attosecond screening dynamics mediated by electron localization in transition metals”,
Nature Physics 15, 1145 (2019).
17. S. A. Sato, J. W. McIver, M. Nuske, P. Tang, G. Jotzu, B. Schulte, H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini,
L. Mathey, M. A. Sentef, A. Cavalleri, A. Rubio, “Microscopic theory for the light-induced
anomalous Hall effect in graphene”, Phys. Rev. B 99, 214302 (2019).
18. M. Chávez-Cervantes, G.E. Topp, S. Aeschlimann, R. Krause, S.A. Sato, M.A. Sentef, I. Gierz,“Charge density wave melting in one-dimensional wires with femtosecond subgap excitation”,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 036405 (2019).
19. S. Burrello, M. Colonna, G. Colò, D. Lacroix, X. Roca-Maza, G. Scamps, and H. Zheng, “Interplay
between low-lying isoscalar and isovector dipole modes: A comparative analysis between
semiclassical and quantum approaches”, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054314 (2019).
20. A. Quddus, G. Panotopoulos, B. Kumar, S. Ahmad, and S. K. Patra, “GW170817 constraints on
the properties of a neutron star in the presence of WIMP dark matter”, JPS Conf. Proc, 31, 011053(2020).
21. B. Kumar, “Neutron skins of heavy nuclei and tidal deformability of neutron star”, JPS Conf.
Proc. 31, 011052 (2020).
22. A. Yamada and K. Yabana, “Modulation of probe signal in coherent phonon detection revisited:
Analytical and first-principles computational analyses”, arXiv:2004.09069 (2020).
23. Yuta Hirokawa, Atsushi Yamada, Shunsuke Yamada, Masashi Noda, Mitsuharu Uemoto,
Taisuke Boku, and Kazuhiro Yabana, “Ab-Initio Simulation of Light-Matter Interaction at theAtomic Scale in Fugaku”, SC20, submitted.
24. Y. Kashiwaba, T. Nakatsukasa, “S Coordinate-space solver for finite-temperature Hartree-FockBogoliubov calculations using the shifted Krylov method”, Phys. Rev. C accepted.
25. T. Nakatsukasa, Y. Kashiwaba, F. Ni, K. Washiyama, K. Wen, N. Hinohara, “Nuclear structure
and reaction with quantum shape fluctuation”, JPS Conf. Proc., accepted.
26. H.C. Das, A. Kumar, B. Kumar, S.K. Biswal, T. Nakatsukasa, A. Li, and S.K. Patra, “Effects ofdark matter on the nuclear and neutron star matter”, MNRAS, accepted.
27. J. Ha, T. Sumikama, F. Browne, N. Hinohara, A. M. Bruce, et al., “Shape evolution of neutronrich 106,108,110Mo isotopes in the triaxial degree of freedom”, Phys. Rev. C, accepted.

B) ᰝㄞ↓ࡋㄽᩥ- 115-

1.

A. Yamada and K. Yabana, “First-principles electron dynamics simulation study of high intensity
laser irradiation on crystal systems: Photon energy dependent energy transfer", EPJ Web ofConferences; 205, 04020 (2019).

2.

M. Uemoto, K. Yabana, S. A. Sato, Y. Hirokawa and T. Boku, “A first-principles simulation
method for ultra-fast nano-optics”, EPJ Web Conf. Volume 205, 04023 (2019).

3.

S. Yamada, M. Noda, K. Nobusada and K. Yabana, “First-principles method for propagation ofultrashort pulsed light in thin films”, EPJ Web of Conferences 205, 01003 (2019).

4.

N. Hinohara, “Efficient QRPA calculation for two-neutrino double-beta decay nuclear matrix
element”, AIP Conf. Proc. 2165, 020010 (2019).

5.

S. A. Sato, U. De Giovannini, S. Aeschlimann, I. Gierz, H. Hübener, A. Rubio, “Floquet states indissipative open quantum systems”, submitted.

6.

Chang-Ming Wang, Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean, Massimo Altarelli, Angel Rubio, Shunsuke A. Sato,“Role of electron scattering on the high-order harmonic generation from solids”, submitted.

7.

Umberto De Giovannini, Hannes Hübener, Shunsuke A. Sato, Angel Rubio, “Direct
measurement of electron-phonon coupling with time-resolved ARPES”, submitted.

8.

Jiaojian Shi, Edoardo Baldini, Simone Latini, Shunsuke A. Sato, Yaqing Zhang, Brandt Pein,
Pin-chun Shen, Jing Kong, Angel Rubio, Nuh Gedik, Nelson, Keith, “Room Temperature
Terahertz Electroabsorption Modulation by Excitons in Monolayer Transition Metal
Dichalcogenides”, submitted.

9.

Dongbin Shin, Shunsuke A. Sato, Hannes Hübener, Umberto De Giovannini, Noejung Park,
Angel Rubio, “Nonlinear phononics in 2D ferroelectric materials as dynamical amplification ofelectric polarization”, submitted.

10. Y. Sanari, H. Hirori, T. Aharen, H. Tahara, Y. Shinohara, K. L. Ishikawa, T. Otobe, P. Xia, N. Ishii,
J. Itatani, S. A. Sato, and Y. Kanemitsu, “Role of Nonlinear Virtual Population for High Harmonic
Generation in Solids”, submitted.

(2) ᅜ㝿఍㆟Ⓨ⾲A) ᣍᚅㅮ₇
1.

K. Yabana, “Ab-initio theory for propagation of extreme optical pulses in solids”, 2nd Int.
Workshop on Ultrafast Dynamics and Metastability, Georgetwon Univ., Washingdon DC, USA,
April 15 - 17, 2019.

2.

K. Yabana, “Ab-initio theory for propagation of strong optical pulse in solids”, XXXIst Int. Conf.
on Photonic, Electronic, and Atomic Collisions (ICPEAC2019), Deauville, France, 23 - 30, July,
2019.

3.

K. Yabana, “Time-dependent density functional theory for solids under strong laser field”, 24thInt. Workshop on Quantum Systems in Chemistry, Physics, and Biology, Odessa, Ukraine, 18 24, Aug. 2019.

4.

M. Uemoto, A. Yamada, and K. Yabana, “Maxwell+TDDFT multiscale method for lightpropagation in solids”, 27th International Conference on Advanced Laser Technologies, Prague,
Czech Republic, Sept. 2019.

5.

T. Takeuchi, M. Noda, and K. Yabana, “Linear and nonlinear optical responses of plasmonic
metasurface with sub-nm gaps”, 27th International Conference on Advanced Laser Technologies,
Prague, Czech Republic, Sept. 2019.

6.

K. Yabana, “Ab-initio Simulations for Propagation of Intense and Ultrashort Optical Pulse”,- 116-

OptoX-Nano 2019, Okayama, Dec. 3, 2019.
7.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Energy density functional approach to nuclear dynamics”, XVII Workshop on
Nuclear Physics, Havana, Cuba, Apr. 1 - 5, 2019.

8.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Collective motion, GCM, and requantization of time-dependent mean field”,
Nuclear Physics Symposium “Challenges in theory of heavy nuclei”, York, UK, July 17 - 20, 2019.

9.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Self-consistent description of the inner crust of neutron stars”, Microscopic
Approaches to Nuclear Structure and Reactions, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,
Livermore, CA, USA, Nov. 12 - 15, 2019.

10. T. Nakatsukasa, “Green’s function method for nuclear structure theory”, Workshop on new
generation nuclear density functionals, Peking, China, Nov. 18 - 22, 2019.
11. N. Hinohara, “Efficient QRPA calculation for two-neutrino double-beta decay nuclear matrix
element”, Matrix Elements for the Double beta decay Experiments (MEDEX'19) Czech National
Library of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic, May 27 - 31, 2019.
12. N. Hinohara, “Neutron-proton pairing in nuclear density functional theory”, Nuclear Physics
Symposium “Challenges in theory of heavynuclei”, York, UK, July 17 - 20, 2019.
13. N. Hinohara, “Isovector pairing and nuclear mass”, RIBF Week 2019, Wako, Japan, Sept. 2 - 4,
2019.
14. N. Hinohara, “Isovector pairing energy density functional and pairing collective motion”,
Microscopic Approaches to Nuclear Structure and Reactions, Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA, Nov. 12 - 15, 2019.

B) ୍⯡ㅮ₇
1.

T. Takeuchi, M. Noda, K. Yabana, “Numerical Analysis of Quantum Plasmonic Metasurface by
Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory”, 19th International Conference on Numerical
Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices, Ottawa, Canada, July 8 - 12, 2019.

2.

M. Uemoto, S. Yamada, T. Takeuchi, Y. Hirokawa and K. Yabana, “Ab-initio large-scalecalculation of laser interactions with nanoscale materials”, MCRP-62, 11th symposium on
Discovery, Fusion, Creation of New Knowledge by Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences,
Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 2019.

3.

M. Uemoto and K. Yabana, “Development of Multiscale First-Principles Approach for Optical
Response in Nanostructure”, iSPN2019, Kobe, Japan, Nov. 13, 2019.

4.

T. Takeuchi, M. Noda, and K. Yabana, “Refractive index variation of quantum plasmonic5.

S. Yamada, M. Noda, K. Nobusada, and K. Yabana, “First-principles study for interaction ofmetasurface with sub-nm gaps”, iSPN2019, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, Nov. 13, 2019.
pulsed light with thin materials”, iSPN2019, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan, Nov. 13, 2019.
6.

T. Nakatsukasa, “Summary and discussion”, China-Japan Collaboration Workshop on “Nuclear
Mass and Life for Unraveling Mysteries of R-process”, Beijing, China, Oct. 9 - 13, 2019.

7.

Y. Hashimoto, “Study of structure and reaction mechanism of superfluid nuclei based on thedensity functional theory”, 11th symposium on Discovery, Fusion, Creation of New Knowledge by
Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 15, 2019 (Poster).

8.

N. Hinohara, “Pairing rotation and pairing energy density functional”, Nuclear Structure andDynamics (NSC2019) Centro Culturale Don Orione Artigianelli, Venice, Italy, May 13 - 17, 2019.

9.

N. Hinohara, “Isovector neutron-proton pairing condensation in proton-rich unstable nuclei”, 5thworkshop on many-body correlations in microscopic nuclear models (SADO2019), Sado, Japan,- 117-

Sept. 5 - 6, 2019.
10. N. Hinohara, “Isovector pairing and nuclear binding energy”, China-Japan Collaboration
Workshop on “Nuclear Mass and Life for Unraveling Mysteries of R-process”, Beijing, China, Oct.
9 - 13, 2019.
11. N. Hinohara, “FAM-QRPA calculation for double-beta decay nuclear matrix elements”, 11th
symposium on Discovery, Fusion, Creation of New Knowledge by MultidisciplinaryComputational Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 15, 2019 (Poster).
12. K. Wen, “Optimal collective coordinate in nuclear collective dynamics”, The 18th CNS
International Summer School (CNSSS19), Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Tokyo,
Japan, Aug. 20 - 27, 2019.
13. K. Wen, “Adiabatic self-consistent collective motion path”, 5th workshop on many-bodycorrelations in microscopic nuclear models (SADO2019), Sado, Japan, Sept. 5 - 6, 2019.
14. K. Wen, “Microscopic simulations for nuclear fusion reactions”, China-Japan Collaboration
Workshop on “Nuclear Mass and Life for Unraveling Mysteries of R-process”, Beijing, China, Oct.
9 - 13, 2019.
15. B. Kumar, “Neutron skins of heavy nuclei and tidal polarizability of neutron star”, The 15th
International Symposium on Origin of Matter and Evolution of Galaxies (OMEG15), Yukawa
Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, July 2 - 5, 2019 (Poster).
16. A. Quddus, G. Panotopoulos, B. Kumar, “GW170817 constraints on the properties of a neutronstar in the presence of WIMP dark matter”, The 15th International Symposium on Origin of
Matter and Evolution of Galaxies (OMEG15), Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto
University, Kyoto, Japan, July 2 - 5, 2019 (Poster).
17. B. Kumar, “New effective interactions IOPB-I and G3”, The 18th CNS International Summer
School (CNSSS19), Center for Nuclear Study, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, Aug. 21 - 27,
2019.
18. B. Kumar, “Neutron star astrophysics from gravitational waves and nuclear theory”, 5thworkshop on many-body correlations in microscopic nuclear models (SADO2019), Sado, Japan,
Sept. 5 - 6, 2019.
19. B. Kumar, “Tidal deformability for neutron and hyperon stars”, Quark and Compact Star 2019
(QCS2019), Busan, Korea, Sept. 26 - 29, 2019 (Poster).
20. B. Kumar, “GW170817: Constraints on the moment of inertia PSR J0737-3039A”, Centenary
Celebration Conference on Nuclear Structure and Nuclear Reaction, Aligarh, India, Mar. 2 - 4,2020 (Poster).

C) ࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮➼1.

N. Hinohara, “Neutron-proton pairing in nuclear density functional theory”, NSCL Theory
Seminar, NSCL/FRIB Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, Jan. 14, 2020.

2.

S. A. Sato, “Ab-initio electron dynamics simulation for attosecond physics in solids”, Seminar at
the Vienna University of Technology, Aug. 5, 2019.

3.

S. A. Sato, “First-principles electron dynamics simulation for attosecond science in solids”,
Seminar at the University of Tokyo, Sept. 24, 2019.

4.

S. A. Sato, “Ab-initio electron dynamics simulations for attosecond science in solids”, Seminar at
the University of Graz, Dec. 13, 2019.

5.

B. Kumar, “Tidal deformability, and new relativistic models IOPB-I and G3”, Hadron theory- 118-

group at University of Tokyo, Japan, July 23, 2019.
6.

B. Kumar, “Relativistic models (G3 and IOPB-I) of the neutron-star matter equation of states”,
Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea, Sept. 24, 2019.

7.

B. Kumar, “Constraints on the moment of inertia of neutron-star/pulsars from GW170817”,
Seminar at Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India, Feb. 27, 2020.

(3) ᅜෆᏛ఍࣭◊✲఍Ⓨ⾲A) ᣍᚅㅮ₇1.

▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ኱つᶍィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿග㟁☢ሙ࣭㟁Ꮚ࣭ࣇ࢛ࣀࣥࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࠖࠊ➨㸴ᅇ኱ᆺᐇ㦂᪋タ࡜ࢫ࣮ࣃ࣮ࢥࣥࣆ࣮ࣗࢱ࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠ฼⏝ࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘-≀㉁ᵓ㐀ࡢ㝵ᒙᛶ࡜ࣇ࢛ࣀࣥ≀ᛶࡢ⌮ゎ-ࠊᮾி⛅ⴥཎ UDXࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 17 ᪥.

2.

୰ົᏕࠊ
ࠕ୰ᛶᏊᫍෆẆࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ࡜ࣃࣝࢧ࣮࣭ࢢࣜࢵࢪࠖ
ࠊࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ࡟ࡼࡿᏱᐂࡢ
ᇶᮏἲ๎࡜㐍໬ࡢゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅ࡚ (QUCS 2019)ࠊி㒔኱Ꮫࠊி㒔ࠊ2019 ᖺ 12 ᭶ 16 - 19 ᪥.

3.

᪥㔝ཎ ఙ⏕ࠊࠕ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢ᰾ᵓ㐀ィ⟬ࠖ
ࠊELPH ࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࠊᮾ໭኱Ꮫ㟁Ꮚග⌮Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ࠊ௝ྎࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 12 ᪥.

B) ࡑࡢ௚ࡢⓎ⾲1.

▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃග⛉Ꮫࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ SALMON ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡜ᛂ⏝ࠖࠊ ࣏ࢫࢺࠕிࠖ㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟㸦㸵㸧➨㸳ᅇࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊᮾி኱Ꮫࠊ2019 ᖺ 8 ᭶ 9 ᪥

2.

᳜ᮏග἞ࠊᒣ⏣⠜ࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ኱つᶍィ⟬ࢆࡶࡕ࠸ࡓᴟ㝈ࣃࣝࢫග࣭ᅛయ≀㉁┦஫స⏝ࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥࠖ
ࠊ࣏ࢫࢺࠕிࠖ㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟 7 ➨ 5 ᅇࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊᩥி༊ᮏ㒓ࠊ2019 ᖺ 8 ᭶ 9 ᪥.

3.

ᘅᕝ♸ኴࠊ᳜ᮏග἞ࠊ㔝⏣┿ྐࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ
ࠕA64FX ࣉࣟࢭࢵࢧ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ㟁ᏊືຊᏛ࢔ࣉࣜࢣ࣮ࢩ
ࣙࣥ SALMON ࡢࢥࢹࢨ࢖ࣥࠖ
ࠊ࣏ࢫࢺࠕிࠖ㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟 7 ➨ 5 ᅇࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊᩥி༊ᮏ㒓ࠊ2019ᖺ 8 ᭶ 9 ᪥.

4.

᳜ᮏග἞ࠊⶶ⏣┿ኴ㑻ࠊἙཱྀ⣖ோࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬࡟ࡼࡿࣃࣝࢫග࡜ࢢࣛࣇ࢓࢖ࢺⷧ⭷ࡢ┦஫స⏝ࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍ 2019 ᖺ⛅Ꮨ኱఍ࠊᒱ㜧ࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 12 ᪥.

5.

ᒣ⏣ಇ௓ࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ⤖ᬗᑐ⛠ᛶ࡜᫬㛫ศゎືⓗ Franz-Keldysh ຠᯝࡢ㛵ಀ㸸⌮ㄽ࡜➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍ 2019 ᖺ⛅Ꮨ኱఍ࠊᒱ㜧ࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 10 ᪥.

6.

➉ෆᔞࠊ㔝⏣┿ྐࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ ࠕࢧࣈ nm ࢠࣕࢵࣉࢆ᭷ࡍࡿࣉࣛࢬࣔࢽࢵࢡ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢᒅᢡ⋡ኚືᶵᵓࡢゎ᫂ࠖ
ࠊ➨ 80 ᅇᛂ⏝≀⌮Ꮫ఍⛅ᏘᏛ⾡ㅮ₇఍㸪໭ᾏ㐨㸪2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶㸬

7.

ᒣ⏣⠜ᚿࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ࣐ࣝࢳࢫࢣ࣮ࣝࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩ࡛ࣙࣥ┤᥋ⓗ࡟෌⌧ࡋࡓࢥࣄ࣮ࣞࣥࢺࣇ࢛ࣀࣥ
࡟ᑐࡍࡿ࣏ࣥࣉ㸫ࣉ࣮ࣟࣈศගࢩࢢࢼࣝࡢゎᯒࠖࠊ➨ 13 ᅇศᏊ⛉Ꮫウㄽ఍ࠊྡྂᒇࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶
17 ᪥.

8.

▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ ➉ෆᔞࠊ㔝⏣┿ྐࠊࠕࢧࣈ nm ࢠࣕࢵࣉࢆ᭷ࡍࡿࣉࣛࢬࣔࢽࢵࢡ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢᒅᢡ⋡ኚືᶵᵓࡢゎ᫂ࠖ
ࠊ➨ 80 ᅇᛂ⏝≀⌮Ꮫ఍⛅ᏘᏛ⾡ㅮ₇఍ࠊ໭ᾏ㐨኱Ꮫᮐᖠ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 18
᪥.

9.

ᒣ⏣⠜ᚿࠊ
▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊ
ࠕᴟ㝈ⓗࣃࣝࢫග࡜ࣂࣝࢡ≀㉁ࡢ┦஫స⏝࡟ᑐࡍࡿ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ࠖ
ࠊ
➨㸴ᅇ
ࠕிࠖ
ࢆ୰᰾࡜ࡍࡿ HPCI ࢩࢫࢸ࣒฼⏝◊✲ㄢ㢟ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ࠊရᕝࠊ2019 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 1 ᪥.

10. ➉ෆᔞࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕࢧࣈ nm ࢠࣕࢵࣉࢆ᭷ࡍࡿࣉࣛࢬࣔࢽࢵࢡ࣓ࢱ⾲㠃ࡢ㠀⥺ᙧගᏛᛂ⟅ゎᯒ ̿ࢪ࢙࣒ࣜ࢘ᶍᆺࢆ㐺⏝ࡋࡓ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ࡼࡿ᳨ウ̿ࠖࠊ➨ 67 ᅇᛂ⏝≀⌮Ꮫ఍⛅ᏘᏛ⾡ㅮ₇఍ࠊ2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 13 ᪥(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇࠊண✏ࡢࡳ).
11. ᒣ⏣ಇ௓ࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕⷧ⭷࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼⓎ⏕ࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ィ⟬ࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨㸵㸳ᅇᖺḟ኱఍ࠊྡྂᒇ኱Ꮫࠊ2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇࠊண✏ࡢࡳ).

- 119-

12. ᘅᕝ ♸ኴࠊ㔝⏣ ┿ྐࠊᒣ⏣ ಇ௓ࠊᒣ⏣ ⠜ᚿࠊᮔ Ὀ♸ࠊ▮ⰼ୍ᾈࠊࠕ㟁ᏊືຊᏛ࢔ࣉࣜࢣ࣮ࢩࣙ
ࣥ SALMON ࡢࢫ࣮ࣃ࣮ࢥࣥࣆ࣮ࣗࢱࠕᐩᓅࠖ࡟ྥࡅࡓ᭱㐺໬࡜ᛶ⬟ホ౯ࠖࠊ➨ 173 ᅇ HPC ◊✲఍ࠊᮐᖠࠊ2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇࠊண✏ࡢࡳ)
13. ୰ົᏕࠊ
ࠕNuclear clusters in low-energy nuclear reaction and neutron-star crustࠖࠊ➨஧ᅇࢡࣛࢫ
ࢱ࣮㝵ᒙ㡿ᇦ◊✲఍ࠊ2019 ᖺ 5 ᭶ 31 ᪥ - 6 ᭶ 1 ᪥.
14. 㛵⃝୍அ㸦ㄢ㢟௦⾲㸸୰ົᏕ㸧ࠊࠕ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ࡼࡿཎᏊ᰾཯ᛂࠖ
ࠊ➨ 6 ᅇࠕிࠖࢆ୰᰾
࡜ࡍࡿ HPCI ࢩࢫࢸ࣒฼⏝◊✲ㄢ㢟 ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ࠊရᕝࠊᮾிࠊ2019 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 1 ᪥(࣏ࢫࢱ࣮Ⓨ⾲).
15. ᶫᮏᖾ⏨ࠊࠕ᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ㉸ὶືཎᏊ᰾ࡢ཯ᛂᶵᵓࡢ◊✲ࠖࠊ➨ 6 ᅇࠕிࠖࢆ୰
᰾࡜ࡍࡿ HPCI ࢩࢫࢸ࣒฼⏝◊✲ㄢ㢟 ᡂᯝሗ࿌఍ࠊရᕝࠊᮾிࠊ2019 ᖺ 11 ᭶ 1 ᪥(࣏ࢫࢱ࣮Ⓨ⾲).
16. ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊࠕ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲࡜୰ᛶᏊѸ㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵ࠖࠊ኱Ꮫ㝔⌮Ꮫ◊✲⛉࣭≀⌮Ꮫ➨஧ᩍᐊࠊཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢭ࣑ࢼ࣮ࠊி㒔኱Ꮫࠊி㒔ࠊ2019 ᖺ 4 ᭶ 17 ᪥.
17. ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊࠕ᭷㝈᣺ᖜἲࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ 2 ࢽ࣮ࣗࢺࣜࣀ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲ࡢィ⟬ࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍ 2019 ᖺ⛅Ꮨ኱఍, ᒣᙧ኱Ꮫᑠⓑᕝ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫ, ᒣᙧࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 17 - 19 ᪥.
18. ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕, Javid Sheikh, Jacek Dobaczewski, Witold Nazarewicz, ࠕSkyrme ᆺᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ࡬ࡢ࢔࢖ࢯ࣋ࢡࢺࣝᆺ୰ᛶᏊ࣮㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵ࡢᑟධࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 75 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇ)ࠊྡ
ྂᒇ኱Ꮫᮾᒣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊྡྂᒇࠊ2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 16 - 19 ᪥.
19. బ⸨ 㥴୥, M. Volkov, F. Schlaepfer, L. Kasmi, N. Hartmann, M. Lucchini, L. Gallmann, U. Keller,
A. Rubio, ࠕࢳࢱࣥⷧ⭷࡟ᑐࡍࡿ࢔ࢺ⛊㐣Ώ྾཰ศගࡢ➨୍ཎ⌮ⓗゎᯒࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍ 2019 ᖺ⛅Ꮨ኱఍ࠊᒱ㜧኱Ꮫࠊ2019 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 10 - 13 ᪥.
20. బ⸨㥴୥, ᘅ⌮ⱥᇶ, బᡂ᫷அ, 㔠ග⩏ᙪ, Angel Rubio, ࠕࢢࣛࣇ࢙ࣥ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㧗ḟ㧗ㄪἼⓎ⏕ࡢ⌮ㄽⓗゎᯒࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 75 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇ)ࠊྡྂᒇ኱Ꮫᮾᒣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊྡྂᒇࠊ
2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 16 - 19 ᪥.
21. బ⸨㥴୥ࠊࠕᅛయ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ࢔ࢺ⛊㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢ⌮ㄽⓗ◊✲ࠖࠊ᪥ᮏ≀⌮Ꮫ఍➨ 75 ᅇᖺḟ኱఍(⌧ᆅ㛤ദ୰Ṇ)ࠊྡྂᒇ኱Ꮫᮾᒣ࢟ࣕࣥࣃࢫࠊྡྂᒇࠊ2020 ᖺ 3 ᭶ 16 - 19 ᪥.

(4) ⴭ᭩ࠊゎㄝグ஦➼
1.

T. Nakatsukasa and N. Schunck, “Chapter 6: Large-amplitude collective motion” in Book “Energy

2.

density functional methods for atomic nuclei”, IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2019.
୰ົᏕࠊacademist Journal㸦࢜ࣥࣛ࢖ࣥ㸧◊✲ࢥ࣒ࣛࠕཎᏊ᰾ࡢ࠿ࡓࡕࡣࡲࢇࡲࡿ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࠖURL:

3.

https://academist-cf.com/journal/?p=10868
୰ົᏕࠊỤᖭಟ୍㑻ࠊ㮖ᒣᗈᖹࠊࢧ࢖࢚ࣥࢫࡼࡳࡶࡢࠕཎᏊ᰾ࡢ࠿ࡓࡕ࠿ࡽ᰾ᅗ⾲ࢆぢࡿࠖࠊ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍Ꮫ఍ㄅࠊVol. 61, pp. 610 – 615.

4.

᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ࠊ
ࠕ஧㔜࣮࣋ࢱᔂቯཎᏊ᰾⾜ิせ⣲࡜୰ᛶᏊѸ㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵ࠖࠊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ Vol. 64 No. 2 pp.
102 – 113 (2020).

7. ␗ศ㔝㛫㐃ᦠ࣭ᅜ㝿㐃ᦠ࣭ᅜ㝿άື➼࠙␗ศ㔝㛫㐃ᦠࠚ1.

ග⛉Ꮫࢯࣇࢺ࢙࢘࢔ SALMON ࡢ㛤Ⓨ࡟࠶ࡓࡾࠊ㧗ᛶ⬟ィ⟬ࢩࢫࢸ࣒◊✲㒊㛛ࡢᮔࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜ᐦ
᥋࡞◊✲༠ຊࢆ⾜࡞ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ

࠙⏘Ꮫᐁ㐃ᦠࠚ
1.

ᰴᘧ఍♫ఫ཭㔠ᒓ㖔ᒣ࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ࠊSALMON ࢆ⏝࠸ࡓග⛉Ꮫィ⟬࡟㛵ࡋ࡚Ꮫ⾡ᣦᑟࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ᮶ᖺ
ᗘࡣඹྠ◊✲࡟Ⓨᒎࡍࡿணᐃ࡛࠶ࡿ㸦▮ⰼ㸧ࠋ

- 120-

2.

⛉Ꮫᢏ⾡᣺⯆ᶵᵓࡢ A-STEP ⤒㈝࡟ࡼࡾࠊ
ࠕ࢔࢖ࢭ࣮ࣇἼ㛗⏝㧗ຠ⋡ Si ཷගࢭࣥࢧࡢ㛤Ⓨࠖ࡟㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊᮾி኱ᏛᕤᏛ⣔◊✲⛉ࡢඵ஭෸ᩍᤵࢆ୰ᚰ࡜ࡋ࡚ࠊ⟃Ἴ኱ࡢ▮ⰼࠊ὾ᯇ࣍ࢺࢽࢡࢫࢆ஺࠼ࡓ◊✲ࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ㸦▮ⰼ㸧ࠋ࠙ᅜ㝿㐃ᦠࠚ
1.

࢔ࢺ⛊ග⛉Ꮫ࡟㛵ࡋࠊࢢ࣮ࣛࢶᕤ⛉኱Ꮫ㸦࣮࢜ࢫࢺࣜ࢔࣭ࢢ࣮ࣛࢶ㸧ࠊ࣐ࢵࢡࢫࣉࣛࣥࢡ㔞ᏊගᏛ◊✲ᡤ㸦ࢻ࢖ࢶ࣭࢞ࣝࣄࣥࢢ㸧ࠊཬࡧࣂࣝࢭࣟࢼ኱Ꮫ㸦ࢫ࣌࢖ࣥ㸧ࡢᐇ㦂ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜ඹྠ◊✲ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦▮ⰼ㸧.

2.

᫬㛫౫Ꮡᐦᗘỗ㛵ᩘ⌮ㄽࢆ⏝࠸ࡓග࡜≀㉁ࡢ┦஫స⏝࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲ࢆ࢘࢕࣮ࣥᕤ⛉኱Ꮫ㸦࣮࢜ࢫࢺࣜ࢔㸧ࡢ⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿ㸦▮ⰼ㸧ࠋ

3.

H2020-MSCA-RISE㸦Ḣᕞࡢᅜ㝿஺ὶࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ㸧࡟ࡼࡿග࡜≀㉁ࡢ┦஫స⏝ࡢ⌮ㄽ࡜ィ⟬࡟㛵ࢃࡿᅜ㝿ࢿࢵࢺ࣮࣡ࢡᙧᡂࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ ATLANTIC ࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃᅜ㝿ඹྠ◊✲ࢆࠊ௒ᖺᗘࡼࡾ㛤ጞࡋࡓࠋࡇࡢᯟ⤌ࡳࠊཬࡧ㛵㐃ࡍࡿࣉࣟࢪ࢙ࢡࢺ࡛ࠊ௨ୗࡢ◊✲⪅ࡀࢭࣥࢱ࣮࡟㛗ᮇ⁫ᅾࡋࡓ㸦▮ⰼ㸧.
(1) Tzevta Apostolova ࢯࣇ࢕࢔኱Ꮫ㸦ࣈࣝ࢞ࣜ࢔㸧6/14-7/12(2) Thibault Derrien ࣉࣛࣁ኱Ꮫ㸦ࢳ࢙ࢥ㸧6/13-7/12(3) François M.G.J. Coppensࠊ Laboratoire Physique Théorique (LPT)UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE III - Paul Sabatier㸦ࣇࣛࣥࢫ㸧9/16-12/15(4) Anton HusakouࠊMax Born Institute of Berlin (ࢻ࢖ࢶ)ࠊ10/10-11/11(5) Guillaume Dechateauࠊ࣎ࣝࢻ࣮኱Ꮫ㸦ࣇࣛࣥࢫ㸧
ࠊ10/27-11/8

4.

Vanderbilt ኱Ꮫ㸦⡿ᅜ㸧ࡼࡾࠊJustin Michael Malave Ặ㸦኱Ꮫ㝔⏕㸧ࡀ㛗ᮇ⁫ᅾࡋࠊ◊✲஺ὶࢆ⾜ࡗࡓ (6/17-8/13) 㸦▮ⰼ㸧.

5.

஧ᅜ㛫༠ຊ஦ᴗ JSPS-NSFCࠕR ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢㅦゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓ᰾㉁㔞࡜ᑑ࿨ࡢ◊✲ࠖ2017 – 2019㸦᪥ᮏഃ௦⾲㸸୰ົ㸧.

6.

᪥୰㡑ࣇ࢛࣮ࢧ࢖ࢺ஦ᴗࠕ㸰㸯ୡ⣖ࡢཎᏊ᰾≀⌮ࠖ2019-2023㸦୰ົ㸧.

7.

࣏࣮ࣛࣥࢻ࣭࣡ࣝࢩࣕ࣡ᕤ⛉኱ᏛࡢཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡜ඹྠ࡛ࠊᐇ✵㛫 TDHFB ィ⟬㸦୰ົ㸧.

8.

⡿ᅜ࣭࣑ࢩ࢞ࣥᕞ❧኱Ꮫ Nazarewicz ᩍᤵ࡜୰ᛶᏊѸ㝧Ꮚᑐ┦㛵ࡢඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

9.

㡑ᅜ࣭ࢯ࢘ࣝᅜ❧኱Ꮫࡢ኱Ꮫ㝔⏕ Ha Ặ࡜⌮໬Ꮫ◊✲ᡤ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mo ཎᏊ᰾ࡢș-Ț ᰾ศගᐇ㦂࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.

10. ⡿ᅜ࣭࣑ࢩ࢞ࣥᕞ❧኱Ꮫ Wang ẶࠊNazarewicz ᩍᤵࡽ࡜୰ᛶᏊ㐣๫ Mg ཎᏊ᰾ࡢᇶᗏ≧ែ࠾ࡼࡧపບ㉳≧ែ࡟㛵ࡍࡿඹྠ◊✲㸦᪥㔝ཎ㸧.
11. ගࡀㄏ㉳ࡍࡿ㠀ᖹ⾮㟁Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢ⌮ㄽⓗ◊✲࡟㛵ࡋࠊ࣐ࢵࢡࢫࣉࣛࣥࢡ≀㉁ᵓ㐀ࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡ
ࢫ◊✲ᡤ࡜ඹྠ◊✲ࢆᐇ᪋㸦బ⸨㸧.
12. ࢔ࢺ⛊⛉Ꮫ࡟㛵ࡋ࡚ࠊࢳ࣮ࣗࣜࢵࣄᕤ⛉኱Ꮫࠊཬࡧ࣑ࣛࣀᕤ⛉኱Ꮫ࡜ඹྠ◊✲ࢆᐇ᪋㸦బ⸨㸧.
13. 㧗ᙉᗘ THz ගࡢୗ࡛ࡢບ㉳Ꮚࢲ࢖ࢼ࣑ࢡࢫࡢ◊✲࡟㛵ࡋࠊ࣐ࢧࢳ࣮ࣗࢭࢵࢶᕤ⛉኱Ꮫ࡜ࡢඹྠ◊✲ࢆᐇ᪋㸦బ⸨㸧.

8. ࢩ࣏ࣥࢪ࣒࢘ࠊ◊✲఍ࠊࢫࢡ࣮ࣝ➼ࡢ㛤ദᐇ⦼
1.

஧ᅜ㛫༠ຊ஦ᴗ JSPS-NSFCࠕR ࣉࣟࢭࢫࡢㅦゎ᫂࡟ྥࡅࡓ᰾㉁㔞࡜ᑑ࿨ࡢ◊✲ࠖ2017 – 2019, ࡢࢧ࣐࣮࣭࣑࣮ࣜࢸ࢕ࣥࢢ China-Japan Collaboration Workshop on “Nuclear Mass and Life forUnraveling Mysteries of R-process” (Institute of Theoretical Physics, Beijing, China, Oct. 10 – 12,2019)ࢆ㛤ദ㸦᪥ᮏ࠿ࡽ 14 ྡࠊ୰ᅜ࠿ࡽ 18 ྡ㸧(୰ົ).

2.

᪥୰㡑ࣇ࢛࣮ࢧ࢖ࢺ஦ᴗࠕ㸰㸯ୡ⣖ࡢཎᏊ᰾≀⌮ࠖ㸦JSPS/NRF/NSFC A3 Foresight Program“Nuclear Physics in the 21th Century”) Joint Kickoff Meeting, Kobe, Dec. 6 – 7, 2019㸧ࢆ㛤ദ(୰- 121-

ົ).
3.

International advisory and Program committee for Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories(RPMBT-20) Conference, Toulouse, France, Sept. 9 - 13, 2019 㸦୰ົ㸧

4.

Chair of organizing committee for 11th symposium on Discovery, Fusion, Creation of New
Knowledge by Multidisciplinary Computational Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan, Oct. 15, 2019㸦୰ົ㸧.

9. ⟶⌮࣭㐠Ⴀ⤌⧊㐠Ⴀࡸᨭ᥼ᴗົࡢጤဨ࣭ᙺဨࡢᐇ⦼
▮ⰼ୍ᾈィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ே஦ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀ༠㆟఍ጤဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඛ➃ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ᥎㐍ᐊ㛗ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඹྠ◊✲ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㔞Ꮚ≀ᛶ◊✲㒊㛛㛗ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ⟃Ἴ኱Ꮫ 50 ᖺྐ⦅⧩ᑓ㛛ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
≀⌮Ꮫ㢮࣒࢝ࣜ࢟ࣗࣛጤဨ୰ົ Ꮥィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ཎᏊ᰾≀⌮◊✲㒊㛛 㒊㛛୺௵ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ே஦ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ 㐠Ⴀ༠㆟఍ጤဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඹྠ◊✲ᢸᙜ୺ᖿィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඹྠ◊✲ጤဨ఍࠾ࡼࡧඹྠ◊✲㐠⏝ጤဨ఍ ጤဨ㛗ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ Ꮫ㝿ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ㐃ᦠᐊဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ᝟ሗࢭ࢟ࣗࣜࢸ࢕ጤဨ
ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ 㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ ཎᏊ᰾⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ㛗ᩘ⌮≀㉁⣔≀⌮Ꮫᇦ ⌮ㄽࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ᠓ㄯ఍㆟㛗᭱ඛ➃ඹྠ HPC ᇶ┙᪋タ ኱つᶍ HPC ࢳࣕࣞࣥࢪᑂᰝጤဨ఍ ๪ጤဨ㛗
HPCI ࢥࣥࢯ࣮ࢩ࢔࣒ᶵ㛵௦⾲᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ඛ➃ィ⟬⛉Ꮫ᥎㐍ᐊဨィ⟬⛉Ꮫ◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮ ᝟ሗࢭ࢟ࣗࣜࢸ࢕ጤဨ

10. ♫఍㈉⊩࣭ᅜ㝿㈉⊩▮ⰼ୍ᾈᖹᡂ 31 ᖺᗘࢸࢽࣗ࢔ࢺࣛࢵࢡᬑཬ࣭ᐃ╔஦ᴗጤဨ఍ጤဨ

- 122-

୰ົ Ꮥ
Editor for Journal of Physical Society of Japan
Editor for International Journal of Modern Physics E
JAEA ࢱࣥࢹ࣒ᑓ㛛ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
JAEA 㯪᫂◊✲ホ౯ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
኱㜰኱Ꮫ᰾≀⌮◊✲ࢭࣥࢱ࣮࣭㐠Ⴀጤဨ఍ጤဨ
㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ᡤ࣭㐠Ⴀ఍㆟㆟ဨ㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⣲⢏ᏊཎᏊ᰾◊✲ᡤ࣭ᖖ⨨ே஦ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ࣭⮬ᕫホ౯ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
㧗࢚ࢿࣝࢠ࣮ຍ㏿ჾ◊✲ᶵᵓ኱ᆺࢩ࣑࣮ࣗࣞࢩࣙࣥ◊✲᥎㐍ጤဨ఍ጤဨ
ィ⟬ᇶ♏⛉Ꮫ㐃ᦠᣐⅬ㐠Ⴀጤဨ㸦࣏ࢫࢺி㔜Ⅼㄢ㢟㸷㸧୰ᮧㄔኴ㑻㈹㑅⪃ጤဨ᰾⌮ㄽጤဨ఍ጤဨ᪥㔝ཎఙ⏕
RIBF UEC ጤဨ㸦Vice Chair㸧

11. ࡑࡢ௚

- 123-