REFERENCES
Atherton, P. (1978)
Books are for use: final report of the subject access project to the Council on Library
Resources. Syracuse, NY: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University.
Baker, B. (1986)
A conceptual framework for teaching online catalog use.
Librarianship, 12, 90-96.

Journal of Academic

Barber, A.S. & Riccalton, C. (1988)
The use of the LS2000 online public access catalogue at Newcastle University Library.
British Library. (British Library Research &: Development Report, No. 5972).
Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. and Brooks, H.M. (1982)
ASK for information retrieval: Part I, background and theory, Part II, results of design
study. Journal of Documentation, 38, 61-71, 145-64.
Belkin, N.J. & Vickery, A. (1985)
Interaction in information systems: a review of research from document retrieval toknowledge-based systems. British Library. (Library and Information Research Report,35).
Borgman, C.L. (1983)
End user behavior on the Ohio State University libraries' online catalog: a computer
monitoring study. Dublin, Oh: OCLC. (OCLC Report No. O C L C / O P R / R R / 8 3 / 7 ) .
Borgman, C.L. (1986a)
The user's mental model of an information retrieval system: an experiment on aprototype online catalog. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 47-64
Borgman, C.L. (1986b)
Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information retrieval
studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 387-400.
Dalrymple, P.W. (1987)
Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs: toward a cognitive model ofsearching behaviour. P h D . Thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Dervin, B. & Nilan, M. (1986)
Information needs and uses. American Review of Information Science & Technology,21, 3-13.
Dickson, J. (1984)
An analysis of user errors in searching an online catalog. Cataloguing and Classification
Quarterly, 4, 19-38.
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1980)
Verbal reports as data. Psychological review, 87, 215-251.
Gouke, M.N. & Pease, S. (1982)
Title searches in an online catalog and a card catalog: a comparative study of patron
success in two libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 8, 137-143.
65

Hafter, R. (1979)
The performance of card catalogue: a review of research. Library Research, 1, 199-222.
Hancock, M. (1987)
Subject searching behaviour at the library catalogue and at the shelves: implications
for online interactive catalogues. Journal of Documentation, 43, 303-321.
Hancock-Beaulieu, M. (1989)
Online catalogues: a case for the user. In: The online catalogue: developments anddirections. Edited by C.R. Hildreth. London: Library Association, 25-46.
Hancock-Beaulieu, M. & Mitev, N.N. (1989)
Online library catalogues: the interactive dimension. In: Perspectives in information
management, Vol. 1, edited by C. Oppenheim. London: Butterworths. 89-118.
Henty, M. (1986)
The user at the online catalogue: a record of unsuccessful keyword searches. LASIE,
17, 47-52.
Janosky, B., Smith, P.J. & Hildreth, C.R. (1986)
Online library catalog systems: an analysis of user errors. International Journal of
Man Machine Studies, 25, 573-592.
Jones, R.M. (1988)
A comparative evaluation of two online public access catalogues.
Library. (British Library Research Paper No. 39).

London: British

Kern-Simirenko, C. (1983)
OPAC user logs: implications for bibliographic instruction. Library Hi Tech, 1, 27-35.
Larson, R.R. (1986)
Workload characteristics and computer system utilization in online library catalogs.
P h . D , Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Larson, R.R. & Graham, V, (1983)
Monitoring and evaluating Melvyl. Information Technology and Libraries, 2, 93-104.
Lipetz, B. A. (1972)
Catalog use in a large research library. Library Quarterly, 41, 129-139.
Maltby, A. (1973)
U.K. catalogue use survey: a report. London: The Library Association.
Markey, K. (1984)
Subject searching in library catalogs: before and after the introduction of online
catalogs, Dublin, Oh: OCLC.
Markey, K. & Demeyer, A. (1986)
Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index
integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog. Final report tothe Council on Library Resources. Dublin, Oh: OCLC. (OCLC Research Report No.
OCLC/OPR/RR/86/1).
Mitev, N.N., Venner, G.M. & Walker, S. (1985)
66

Designing an online public access catalogue: Okapi, a catalogue on a local area network.
London: British Library. (Library and Information Research Report, No. 39).
Nielsen, B., Baker, B. & Sandore, B. (1985)
Educating the online catalog user: a model for instructional development andevaluation.
Final report to the Council on Library Resources.
Evanston, 111:
Northwestern University Library. ED No. 261 679.
Siegel, E.R. et al (1984)
A comparative evaluation of the technical performance and user acceptance of two
prototype online catalog systems. Information Technology and Libraries, 3, 35-46.
Sullivan, P.A. (1986)
Rhetoric and the search for externally stored knowledge: toward a computer-age artof research. Ph.D Thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University.
Tagliacozzo, R., Rosenberg L. and Kochen, M. (1970)
Access and recognition:from users' data to catalogue entries.
Documentation, 26, 230-249.
Taylor, R.S. (1968)
Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries.
Libraries, 29, 178-189.

Journal ofCollege and Research

Walker, S. & Jones, R.M. (1987)
Improving subject retrieval in online catalogues. I. Stemming, automatic spellingcorrection and cross-reference tables. London: British Library. (British Library
Research Paper No. 24).

67