1666 K Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 207-9100
Facsimile: (202) 862-8430
www.pcaobus.org

THE AUDITOR'S REPORT ON AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WHEN THE
AUDITOR EXPRESSES AN UNQUALIFIEDOPINION
AND RELATED AMENDMENTS TO PCAOBSTANDARDS
Summary:

Board
Contacts:

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
PCAOB Rulemaking
Docket Matter No. 034

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB" or "Board") isadopting a new standard, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial
Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, that will
replace portions of AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements.
The remaining portions of AS 3101 will be redesignated as AS 3105,
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances. The Board is also adopting related amendments to
PCAOB standards.

Martin F. Baumann, Chief Auditor (202/207-9192, baumannm@
pcaobus.org); Jennifer Rand, Deputy Chief Auditor (202/207-9206,
randj@pcaobus.org); Jessica Watts, Associate Chief Auditor (202/2079376, wattsj@pcaobus.org); Karen Wiedemann, Associate Counsel(202/591-4411, wiedemannk@pcaobus.org); Elena Bozhkova, AssistantChief Auditor (202/207-9298, bozhkovae@pcaobus.org); Ekaterina Dizna,
Assistant Chief Auditor (202/591-4125, diznae@pcaobus.org); and Andres
Vinelli, Chief Economist (202/207-9291, vinellia@pcaobus.org).

*****PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page iContents
I.

Summary ............................................................................................................... 1

II.

Background ........................................................................................................... 4
A. Rulemaking History ............................................................................................... 4
B. Initiatives of Other Regulators and Standard Setters ............................................ 7

III.

Overview of the Final Standard ........................................................................... 11IV.

Discussion of the Final Standard ......................................................................... 15

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.

Critical Audit Matters ........................................................................................... 15
Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report................................................. 44
Explanatory Language and Emphasis of a Matter ............................................... 55
Information about Certain Audit Participants ....................................................... 58
Form of the Auditor's Report................................................................................ 59
Application to Other Audits Performed Under PCAOB Standards ....................... 60

V.

Amendments to Other PCAOB Standards........................................................... 61

A. AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances ........................................................................................................... 61
B. Other Amendments to PCAOB Standards........................................................... 63
VI.

Economic Considerations .................................................................................... 64

A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

Need for the Rulemaking ..................................................................................... 65
Baseline............................................................................................................... 72
Benefits ............................................................................................................... 75
Costs and Potential Unintended Consequences ................................................. 86
Alternatives Considered, Including Policy Choices under the Final Standard ..... 96

VII.

Applicability of Critical Audit Matter Requirements ............................................ 101

A. Brokers and Dealers, Investment Companies, and Benefit Plans ..................... 101
B. Smaller Companies ........................................................................................... 108
VIII. Considerations for Audits of Emerging Growth Companies............................... 109
A. Critical Audit Matters ......................................................................................... 110
B. Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report............................................... 112
IX.

Effective Date .................................................................................................... 113

Appendix 1: AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When
the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion ...........................................................A1-1
Appendix 2: Amendments to Other PCAOB Standards .............................................A2-1

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 1

I.

Summary

The Board is adopting a new auditor reporting standard, AS 3101, The Auditor'sReport on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified
Opinion (the "final standard" or "AS 3101") and related amendments to its auditing
standards that will require the auditor to provide new information about the audit andmake the auditor's report more informative and relevant to investors and other financial
statement users. The final standard retains the pass/fail opinion of the existing auditor'sreport but makes significant changes to the existing auditor's report, including thefollowing:Communication of critical audit matters—matters communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements; and(2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor
judgment;

Disclosure of auditor tenure—the year in which the auditor began serving
consecutively as the company's auditor; and

Other improvements to the auditor's report—a number of otherimprovements to the auditor's report to clarify the auditor's role andresponsibilities, and make the auditor's report easier to read.

The Board believes that adopting these requirements responds to the strong
interest of investors for enhanced communication about the audit and is consistent withits mandate to "protect the interests of investors and further the public interest in the
preparation of informative, accurate and independent audit reports."1
The Board is adopting the final standard after more than six years of outreachand public comment, including comments from members of the Board's Standing
Advisory Group ("SAG") and Investor Advisory Group ("IAG"). The Board has taken into
consideration all comments and believes its approach responds to investor requests for
additional information about the financial statement audit without imposing requirements
beyond the auditor's expertise or mandate.
Investors are the beneficiaries of the audit and the auditor's report is the primarymeans by which the auditor communicates with them. Currently, however, the auditor'sreport conveys little of the information obtained and evaluated by the auditor as part of1

Section 101(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"), 15
U.S.C. 7211(a).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 2the audit. And while the auditor's report has generally remained unchanged since the1940s, companies' operations have become more complex and global, and the financial
reporting frameworks have evolved toward an increasing use of estimates, including fairvalue measurements. As part of the audit, auditors often perform procedures involving
challenging, subjective, or complex judgments, but the auditor's report does notcommunicate this information to investors. Stated differently, the auditor's report does
little to address the information asymmetry between investors and auditors,2 eventhough investors have consistently asked to hear more from the auditor, an independent
third-party expert whose work is undertaken for their benefit.3 The Board believes that
reducing the information asymmetry between investors and auditors should, in turn,
reduce the information asymmetry between investors and management. Outside theUnited States, other regulators and standard setters have already adopted expanded
auditor reporting.
The communication of critical audit matters will inform investors and otherfinancial statement users of matters arising from the audit that involved especiallychallenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment, and how the auditor addressed
these matters. The Board believes that these matters will likely be identified in areasthat investors have indicated would be of particular interest to them, such as significant
management estimates and judgments made in preparing the financial statements;
areas of high financial statement and audit risk; significant unusual transactions; andother significant changes in the financial statements. The final standard is designed toelicit more information about the audit directly from the auditor. The Board believes thatthe critical audit matter requirements will respond to requests from investors for more
information from the auditor while appropriately addressing concerns raised by othercommenters.
2

Economists often describe this imbalance, where one party has more or
better information than another party, as "information asymmetry." As part of the systemof financial reporting, the audit of the financial statements helps reduce the information
asymmetry investors face by providing an independent opinion about whether thefinancial statements are presented fairly in all material respects.
3

See PCAOB IAG survey, Improving the Auditor's Report (Mar. 16, 2011)("IAG 2011 survey"). See also CFA Institute's Usefulness of the Independent Auditor'sReport Survey Results (May 4, 2011), Independent Auditor's Report Survey Results(Mar. 31, 2010), and Independent Auditor's Report Monthly Poll Results (Mar. 12, 2008)("CFA survey and poll results"). See also Board public meeting transcripts andparticipant statements (Apr. 2-3, 2014), available on the Board's website in Rulemaking
Docket Matter No. 034, Proposed Auditing Standards on the Auditor's Report and the
Auditor's Responsibilities Regarding Other Information and Related Amendments("Docket 034").

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 3

Investors and investor advocates have suggested a variety of ways in whichinvestors can use the information provided in critical audit matters. In the view of someinvestors, critical audit matters will add to the total mix of information, providing insights
relevant in analyzing and pricing risks in capital valuation and allocation, andcontributing to their ability to make investment decisions. Investors also stated thatcritical audit matters will focus their attention on key financial reporting areas andidentify areas that deserve more attention, enhancing the efficiency of investors andothers in the consumption of financial information. Some investors believe that critical
audit matters will highlight areas that they may wish to emphasize in their engagementwith the company and provide important information that they can use in making proxyvoting decisions, including ratification of the appointment of auditors.
The final standard also includes a new required statement in the auditor's reportdisclosing the year in which the auditor began serving consecutively as the company's
auditor, as well as a number of other improvements to the auditor's report, such as astatement regarding the requirement for the auditor to be independent. Requiring
disclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report will make this information readily
accessible in a timely way for investors who find it useful. The other improvements tothe auditor's report are intended to enhance the user's understanding of the auditor'srole and responsibilities related to the audit of the financial statements, make theauditor's report easier to read, and provide a consistent format.
The final standard will generally apply to audits conducted under PCAOB
standards. However, communication of critical audit matters is not required for audits ofbrokers and dealers reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the"Exchange Act") Rule 17a-5; investment companies other than business development
companies; employee stock purchase, savings, and similar plans ("benefit plans"); andemerging growth companies ("EGCs"), as defined in Section 3(a)(80) of the ExchangeAct. Auditors of these entities may choose to include critical audit matters in theauditor's report voluntarily. The other requirements of the final standard will apply tothese audits.
Critical audit matters are determined using a principles-based framework and theBoard anticipates that the level of auditor effort will depend on the nature andcomplexity of the audit.
The Board is adopting a phased approach to the effective dates for the newrequirements to provide accounting firms, companies, and audit committees more timeto prepare for implementation of the critical audit matter requirements, which are
expected to require more effort to implement than the additional improvements to theauditor's report. Subject to approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission("SEC"), the final standard and amendments will take effect as follows:

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 4
All provisions other than those related to critical audit matters will takeeffect for audits of fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2017; andProvisions related to critical audit matters will take effect for audits of fiscal
years ending on or after June 30, 2019, for large accelerated filers; and forfiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2020, for all other companies
to which the requirements apply.

Auditors may elect to comply before the effective date, at any point after SEC
approval of the final standard.
II.

BackgroundA.

Rulemaking History

Changes to the auditor's report have been discussed by several commissions
and committees, including the 2008 U.S. Department of the Treasury Advisory
Committee on the Auditing Profession ("ACAP").4 ACAP recommended that the PCAOB
consider improvements to the auditor's report, noting that the increasing complexity of
global business operations compels a growing use of judgments and estimates,
including those related to fair value measurements, and contributes to greater
complexity in financial reporting. ACAP said this complexity supported improving thecontent of the auditor's report beyond the current pass/fail model to include a more
relevant discussion about the audit of the financial statements.
The PCAOB commenced its standard-setting project on the auditor's reporting
model in 2010 with outreach to different stakeholders, including investors, financial
statement preparers, and auditors. During that outreach, many investors expressed
dissatisfaction with the content of the existing auditor's report because it provides
investors little, if any, information specific to the audit of the company's financial
statements. Generally, preparers, audit committee members, and auditors were notsupportive of adding company-specific information to the auditor's report, arguing thatthe company, through its management or audit committee, should be the primarysource of the company's financial information. Changes to the auditor's report were also

4

See ACAP, Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing
Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Oct. 6, 2008) at VII:17. See also
The 103rd American Assembly, The Future of the Accounting Profession (Nov. 2003);
Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Oct. 1987); andAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants, The Commission on Auditors'
Responsibilities: Report, Conclusions, and Recommendations (1978).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 5
discussed at the March 2011 IAG meeting.5 Some investors who participated in thatmeeting suggested that expanded auditor reporting would have been helpful before andduring the 2008 financial crisis.6 Later in March 2011, the Board held an open meeting
to discuss findings from its outreach.7
In June 2011, the Board issued a concept release to solicit comment on anumber of potential changes to the auditor's report.8 The Board received 155 comment
letters on the concept release. The Board also held a public roundtable in September
2011 to obtain additional insight on the alternatives presented in the concept release.9
Changes to the auditor's report were also discussed at the November 2011 and 2012
meetings of the Board's SAG.10
After considering the results of its outreach and comments on its concept
release, in August 2013, the Board proposed an auditing standard that included new
requirements for auditors to communicate critical audit matters, as well as additional
improvements to the auditor's report.11 The Board received 248 comment letters on the5

See IAG meeting details and webcast (Mar. 2011), available on the
Board's website.
6

See IAG working group presentation, Lessons Learned from the Financial
Crisis (Mar. 16, 2011), available on the Board's website.
7

See PCAOB open Board meeting details and webcast (Mar. 22, 2011),
available on the Board's website.
8

See Concept Release on Possible Revisions to PCAOB Standards
Related to Reports on Audited Financial Statements and Related Amendments to
PCAOB Standards; Notice of Roundtable, PCAOB Release No. 2011-003 (June 21,2011) ("concept release").
9

See PCAOB roundtable transcript (Sept. 15, 2011), available on the
Board's website in Docket 034.
10

See SAG meeting transcripts (Nov. 2011 and 2012), available on the
Board's website in Docket 034.
11

See Proposed Auditing Standards—The Auditor's Report on an Audit ofFinancial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion; the Auditor's
Responsibilities Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited
Financial Statements and the Related Auditor's Report; and Related Amendments to
PCAOB Standards, PCAOB Release No. 2013-005 (Aug. 13, 2013) ("proposal").

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 6

proposal. Most commenters generally supported the Board's objective to improve theauditor's report to make it more informative and relevant to financial statement users,
but commenters' views varied on the nature and extent of such changes, particularly as
to critical audit matters.12 Investors, analysts, and larger accounting firms generally
supported communication of critical audit matters with some modifications, while manysmaller accounting firms were less supportive, and preparers and audit committee
members generally opposed communication of critical audit matters. Commentersgenerally supported the additional improvements to the auditor's report other than thedisclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report, which investors supported and someother commenters opposed or suggested should be provided in a different document,such as the proxy statement.
In April 2014, the Board held a public meeting to obtain further input on the
proposal from a diverse group of investors and other financial statement users,
preparers, audit committee members, auditors, and others.13 The proposal was further
discussed at the November 2013 and June 2014 SAG meetings, and the October 2013
and 2014 IAG meetings.14
In May 2016, the Board issued a reproposal of the auditor reporting standard thatmodified the proposal in several respects.15 In particular, the reproposal modified thesource, definition, and communication requirements for critical audit matters. The Board
received 88 comment letters on the reproposal. The reproposal was discussed at the
May 2016 SAG meeting and October 2016 IAG meeting.16

12

See comment letters on the proposal, available on the Board's website inDocket 034.
13

See public meeting transcripts and participant statements (Apr. 2-3, 2014),
available on the Board's website in Docket 034.
14

See SAG (Nov. 2013 and June 2014) and IAG meeting transcripts (Oct.
2013 and 2014), available on the Board's website in Docket 034.
15

See Proposed Auditing Standard—The Auditor's Report on an Audit ofFinancial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related
Amendments to PCAOB Standards; PCAOB Release No. 2016-003 (May 11, 2016)("reproposal").
16

See SAG (May 18, 2016) and IAG (Oct. 27, 2016) meeting transcripts,
available on the Board's website in Docket 034.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 7

Several commenters on the reproposal suggested that the Board engage infurther outreach, field testing, or further study before finalizing the standard. One
commenter suggested deferral until the SEC completes any rulemaking on its"disclosure effectiveness" initiative. However, other commenters commended the Boardon the extensive outreach already performed. The Board believes that its extensive
outreach provides an adequate basis to adopt the final standard.
B.

Initiatives of Other Regulators and Standard Setters

1.

Overview of the Requirements of the IAASB, the EU, and the FRC

The form and content of the auditor's report have undergone change globally. In
recent years, several international regulators and standard setters, including theInternational Auditing and Assurance Standards Board ("IAASB"), the European Union("EU"), and the Financial Reporting Council in the United Kingdom ("FRC"), haveadopted requirements for expanded auditor reporting that go beyond the binary pass/failmodel. While their underlying requirements for expanded auditor reporting differ in thedetails, there is a common theme in these initiatives: communicating information aboutaudit-specific matters in the auditor's report. In addition to expanded auditor reporting,many of these initiatives also include other changes to the form and content of theauditor's report.
Several commenters have urged the Board to align the final standard with therequirements of other regulators and standard setters. The Board recognizes that theregulatory environments in other jurisdictions are different from the environment in the
United States; the Board must address unique U.S. requirements and characteristics in
its standard-setting projects. Even so, the Board has considered carefully the efforts
undertaken in other jurisdictions, and, as described in more detail below, the final
requirements are analogous in many respects to auditor reporting requirements
established in other jurisdictions.
IAASB. In September 2014, the IAASB adopted changes to the requirements forthe auditor's report, including a new requirement for the auditor to communicate "keyaudit matters" for audits of listed companies.17 Key audit matters are defined as thosematters that, in the auditor's professional judgment, were of most significance in theaudit of the financial statements of the current period.18 Key audit matters are selected
17

The IAASB changes to the auditor's report are effective for audits offinancial statements for periods ending on or after December 15, 2016.
18

See paragraph 8 of International Standard on Auditing ("ISA") 701,
Communicating Key Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor's Report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 8from matters communicated with those charged with governance and that required
significant auditor attention in performing the audit.19 The IAASB requires that thedescription of each key audit matter in the auditor's report include: (1) why the matter
was considered to be a key audit matter, (2) how the matter was addressed in the audit,and (3) reference to the related disclosures, if any, in the financial statements.20
As part of its auditor reporting project, the IAASB also adopted additionalchanges to the form and content of the auditor's report. These include a statement thatthe auditor is independent of the entity in accordance with the relevant ethicalrequirements relating to the audit,21 an enhanced description of the responsibilities of
the auditor,22 and requiring the auditor's opinion to be the first paragraph of the auditor'sreport.23
EU. In April 2014, the EU adopted legislation creating a number of new
requirements, including expanded auditor reporting requirements, for audits of publicinterest entities ("PIEs"), such as listed companies, credit institutions, and insurancecompanies.24 Under the EU reforms, the auditor's report for a PIE is required to include
a description of the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement, including
assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud, as well as a summary of theauditor's response to those risks and, where relevant, key observations arising withrespect to those risks. In addition, the EU reforms require a statement that the auditor
remained independent of the audited entity and disclosure of auditor tenure.

19

See paragraph 9 of ISA 701.

20

See paragraph 13 of ISA 701.

21

See paragraph 28(c) of ISA 700 (Revised), Forming an Opinion andReporting on Financial Statements.
22

See paragraph 37 of ISA 700.

23

See paragraph 23 of ISA 700.

24

See Article 10, Audit Report, of Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council ("Regulation (EU) No 537/2014") (Apr. 16,
2014). EU member states had until June 2016 to adopt the provisions of the EU
legislation into their own national laws and rules. Information on member state
implementation is available in the "Audit reform in the EU" section of the European
Union's webpage.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 9FRC. In June 2013, the FRC revised its auditor reporting requirements forentities that apply the UK Corporate Governance Code.25 The auditors of those entities
were required, among other things, to describe the risks of material misstatement that
had the greatest effect on: (1) the overall audit strategy; (2) the allocation of resourcesin the audit; and (3) directing the efforts of the engagement team. In addition, auditors
were required to provide an explanation of how the scope of the audit addressed therisks.26
In April 2016, the FRC adopted a final rule, which applies to all listed entities,
updating its 2013 auditor reporting requirements to incorporate the EU27 and the IAASB
requirements.28 Under the final rule, the FRC adopted the IAASB's definition of key
audit matters. In the application and other explanatory material on the definition of key
audit matters, the FRC identified risks of material misstatement, as determined underboth its existing requirements and those of the EU, as key audit matters under thatdefinition. When the FRC proposed these rule changes in September 2015, it statedthat it did not expect the incorporation of its own requirements and those of the EU toresult in an increase in the number of key audit matters communicated in the auditor'sreport over what would be required by the IAASB standard alone.29

25

These entities include companies with a premium listing of equity shareson the London Stock Exchange, regardless of whether they are incorporated in the U.K.
or elsewhere. The changes made to the auditor's report were designed to complement
other changes made to the UK Corporate Governance Code that require the audit
committee to describe significant issues it considered relating to the financial
statements. See Section C.3.8 of FRC UK Corporate Governance Code (Sept. 2012).
26

See paragraphs 19A–B of ISA (UK and Ireland) 700 (Revised June 2013),
The Independent Auditor's Report on Financial Statements ("UK ISA 700 (2013)"). The
FRC 2013 requirements became effective for audits of financial statements for periods
beginning on or after October 1, 2012.
27

In response to questions about the implications of the June 2016 UK
referendum decision to leave the EU, the FRC has stated: "Our regulatory framework is
unchanged and we will continue to apply it." See FRC statement following thereferendum vote to leave the EU (June 24, 2016).
28

See the FRC's Final Draft, ISA (UK and Ireland) 701, Communicating Key
Audit Matters in the Independent Auditor's Report (Apr. 2016). This rule is effective for
audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after June 17, 2016.
29

See FRC, Enhancing Confidence in Audit: Proposed Revisions to the
Ethical Standard, Auditing Standards, UK Corporate Governance Code and GuidancePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 102.

Comparison of the Board's Final Standard to Other Requirements

Even though the underlying auditor reporting requirements of other regulatorsand standard setters are different in the details, in many respects, the initiatives areanalogous to the Board's final standard. All of these initiatives result in expanding theauditor's report beyond the traditional pass/fail model to communicate information
specific to the particular audit. Although the processes of identifying these matters varyacross jurisdictions, there are commonalities in the underlying criteria regarding mattersto be communicated and the communication requirements, such that expanded auditor
reporting could result in the communication of many of the same matters under thevarious approaches.
Sections IV and V include descriptions of the IAASB, EU, and FRC requirementsthat are analogous to the key provisions of the final standard. In April 2016, the FRC
adopted a final rule that updated its 2013 auditor reporting requirements to incorporate
the EU and the IAASB requirements, but auditor reporting under that final rule has notoccurred yet. Because the FRC 2013 requirements govern the expanded auditor
reporting that has occurred in the United Kingdom to date and are the subject of the
FRC reports and academic studies described elsewhere in this release, the FRC 2013
requirements are used as a basis for comparison.
The IAASB's standard is most similar to the Board's final standard. It requires theauditor to communicate "key audit matters" selected from matters communicated withthose charged with governance. In May 2016, the IAASB published a comparison
between its standard and the Board's reproposal, which noted many similarities
between the requirements of key audit matters and critical audit matters, including theframework for determination of the matters to be communicated, the considerations
underlying the determination requirement, and communication requirements.30 Many
commenters on the reproposal were supportive of the Board's closer alignment with the
IAASB.
The FRC, under its 2013 requirements, and the EU start with the risks of material
misstatement and contemplate a different process for determining matters to becommunicated than the Board's final standard. The FRC has stated that key audit
matters under the IAASB standard are broadly equivalent to the assessed risks ofmaterial misstatement included in the UK ISA 700 (2013).31 Under the Board's final
on Audit Committees (Sept. 2015).
30

See IAASB, The New Auditor's Report: A Comparison between the ISAs
and the US PCAOB Reproposal (May 2016).
31

See FRC, Extended Auditor's Reports, A Further Review of ExperiencePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 11standard, the auditor's assessment of the risks of material misstatement is one of thefactors for the auditor to consider in determining critical audit matters.
The IAASB and the FRC 2013 requirements are accompanied by application andother explanatory materials that provide further guidance on the standards. Because
these materials are not part of the requirements, they are not addressed in thedescriptions of the requirements of other regulators and standard setters presented in
Sections IV and V.
III.

Overview of the Final Standard

The Board is adopting a new auditor reporting standard, which is attached as
Appendix 1. The final standard retains the pass/fail opinion of the existing auditor'sreport but makes significant changes to the existing auditor's report, including thefollowing:Critical audit matters (see chart on page 14)—requires the auditor tocommunicate in the auditor's report any critical audit matters arising from thecurrent period's audit of the financial statements or state that the auditor
determined that there are no critical audit matters:oA critical audit matter is defined as a matter that was communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates
to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and(2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor
judgment.

o

In determining whether a matter involved especially challenging,
subjective, or complex auditor judgment, the auditor takes into account,alone or in combination, certain factors, including, but not limited to:

The auditor's assessment of the risks of material misstatement,
including significant risks;The degree of auditor judgment related to areas in the financial
statements that involved the application of significant judgment or
estimation by management, including estimates with significant
measurement uncertainty;(Jan. 2016) ("FRC 2016 Report") at 7.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 12

o

o





The nature and timing of significant unusual transactions and theextent of audit effort and judgment related to these transactions;

The degree of auditor subjectivity in applying audit procedures toaddress the matter or in evaluating the results of those procedures;The nature and extent of audit effort required to address the matter,
including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed or thenature of consultations outside the engagement team regarding thematter; andThe nature of audit evidence obtained regarding the matter.

The communication of each critical audit matter includes:


Identifying the critical audit matter;

Describing the principal considerations that led the auditor todetermine that the matter is a critical audit matter;

Describing how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit;and

Referring todisclosures.

therelevant

financialstatement

accountsor

The documentation of critical audit matters requires that for each matterarising from the audit of the financial statements that (a) was
communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee,and (b) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial
statements, the auditor documents whether or not the matter wasdetermined to be a critical audit matter (i.e., involved especiallychallenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment) and the basis forsuch determination.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report—the final standard also includes
a number of other improvements to the auditor's report that are primarily intended
to clarify the auditor's role and responsibilities related to the audit of the financial
statements, provide additional information about the auditor, and make theauditor's report easier to read:oAuditor tenure—a statement disclosing the year in which the auditor
began serving consecutively as the company's auditor;

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 13oIndependence—a
independent;

statement

that

the

auditorisrequired

to

be

o

Addressee—the auditor's report will be addressed to the company's
shareholders and board of directors or equivalents (additional addressees
are also permitted);oEnhancements to basic elements—certain standardized language in theauditor's report has been changed, including adding the phrase whether
due to error or fraud, when describing the auditor's responsibility under
PCAOB standards to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatements; andoStandardized form of the auditor's report—the opinion will appear in thefirst section of the auditor's report and section titles have been added to
guide the reader.

The Board intends to monitor the results of implementation, including
consideration of any unintended consequences.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 14

Determining and Communicating Critical Audit Matters ("CAMs")

Communicated or required to becommunicated to the audit committee, and

FACTORS THE AUDITOR SHOULD TAKE INTO
ACCOUNT IN DETERMINING CAMs:
a. The auditor's assessment of the risks of material
misstatement, including significant risks;

Relates to accounts or disclosuresthat are material to the financial
statements, andInvolved especiallychallenging,
subjective, or complex
auditor judgment

b. The degree of auditor judgment related to areas in
the financial statements that involved theapplication of significant judgment or estimation
by management, including estimates withsignificant measurement uncertainty;c. The nature and timing of significant unusualtransactions and the extent of audit effort andjudgment related to these transactions;

Factorsd. The degree of auditor subjectivity in applying audit
procedures to address the matter or in evaluating
the results of those procedures;e. The nature and extent of audit effort required toaddress the matter, including the extent ofspecialized skill or knowledge needed or thenature of consultations outside the engagement
team regarding the matter; andf.

Not a CAM

If there are no CAMs atall, include a statementin the auditor's reportthat there are no CAMs

CAM

Communicate CAMs in
the auditor's report

The nature of audit evidence obtained regarding
the matter.

COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS
a. Identify the critical audit matter;b. Describe the principal considerations that led theauditor to determine that the matter is a critical
audit matter;c. Describe how the critical audit matter wasaddressed in the audit; andd. Refer to the relevant financial statement accounts
or disclosures that relate to the critical audit
matter.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 15

IV.

Discussion of the Final StandardA.

Critical Audit Matters

Under the final standard, the auditor will be required to communicate critical audit
matters in the auditor's report in order to provide more information about the audit andmake the auditor's report more informative and relevant to investors and other financial
statement users.
Investor, investor advocate, and analyst commenters generally supported the
reproposed requirement to communicate critical audit matters. Some of them stated thatthe communication of critical audit matters would be relevant to investors and otherfinancial statement users by informing them of issues identified in the audit that weresignificant to the auditor, focusing attention on issues that would be pertinent tounderstanding the financial statements, and enhancing investor confidence in thefinancial statements.
The larger and some smaller accounting firms generally supported including
critical audit matters in the auditor's report with some modification of the reproposed
requirements. Other commenters, including other smaller accounting firms, companies,
and audit committee members, did not support the requirements. Some of thesecommenters asserted that critical audit matters would not provide relevant information
to investors, may be duplicative of the company's disclosure, may result in disclosing
information not otherwise required to be disclosed, could increase cost, or could delay
completion of the audit.
Other commenters suggested that the Board align the definition of critical audit
matters with the IAASB's definition of key audit matters to enhance overall consistency.
Consistent with the Board's statutory mandate under Section 101(a) of SarbanesOxley and in response to the ACAP recommendation and continued investor support for
expanded auditor reporting, the final standard includes the requirement to communicate
critical audit matters substantially as reproposed. The Board has taken into
consideration all comments, including concerns raised by some commenters, which aredescribed in more detail below, and believes its approach responds to investor requests
for additional information about the financial statement audit without imposing
requirements beyond the auditor's expertise or mandate. The communication of critical
audit matters will inform investors and other financial statement users of matters arisingfrom the audit that involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor
judgment, and how the auditor addressed those matters.
Critical audit matters are determined using a principles-based framework and theBoard anticipates that the level of auditor effort will depend on the nature andPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 16

complexity of the audit. This would in turn depend on the complexity of the operations
and accounting and control systems of the company.
1.

Determination of Critical Audit Mattersa.

Definition of Critical Audit Matter

The reproposed standard defined a critical audit matter as any matter arisingfrom the audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to becommunicated to the audit committee and that relates to accounts or disclosures thatare material to the financial statements and involved especially challenging, subjective,
or complex auditor judgment. For the reasons explained below, the Board is adopting
the definition as reproposed.
i.

Communicated or Required to be Communicated to the Audit
Committee

Most commenters agreed that matters communicated or required to becommunicated to the audit committee would be the appropriate source for critical audit
matters. These commenters stated that matters communicated to the audit committee
are the most meaningful to users of the financial statements and using them as thesource of critical audit matters would assist the auditor in determining critical audit
matters in the most efficient and effective manner.
PCAOB standards require the auditor to communicate to the audit committee,
among other things:
Significant risks identified by the auditor;



Certain matters regarding the company's accounting policies, practices,and estimates;

Significant unusual transactions;

Certain matters regarding the auditor's evaluation of the company's
relationships and transactions with related parties; and

Other matters arising from the audit that are significant to the oversight ofthe company's financial reporting process.

Several commenters suggested revising the source of critical audit matters.
Some suggested narrowing the source of critical audit matters only to matters required
to be communicated to the audit committee, on the basis that this would avoid chilling
communications regarding non-required matters and reduce the burden of

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 17

documentation. Other commenters suggested that the Board consider, as analternative, selecting critical audit matters only from critical accounting policies andestimates disclosed by management, which some said would eliminate the potential forthe auditor to become the original source of information, as well as the potential for
conflicting disclosures between the auditor and management. Some commenters also
recommended not specifying the source for critical audit matters and leaving it up to
auditor judgment. Other commenters suggested broadening the source of critical audit
matters to include matters documented in the engagement completion document,
reviewed by the engagement quality reviewer, or communicated with management andother members of the board of directors, as the Board had originally proposed in 2013.
The final standard retains the source of critical audit matters as reproposed.
Critical audit matters will be drawn from matters required to be communicated to theaudit committee (even if not actually communicated) and matters actuallycommunicated (even if not required). The source will include auditor communication
requirements under AS 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, other PCAOB
rules and standards,32 and applicable law,33 as well as communications made to theaudit committee that were not required. This approach scopes in the broadest
population of audit committee communications and will not require the auditor todetermine whether matters communicated to the audit committee were required to becommunicated. However, it seems likely that matters that meet the definition of a critical
audit matter will usually relate to areas that are required to be communicated to theaudit committee, either under a specific communication requirement or the broad
provisions of paragraph .24 of AS 1301, which requires communication of mattersarising from the audit that are significant to audit committee oversight of the financial
reporting process.
Required communications to the audit committee generally include the areas inwhich investors have expressed particular interest in obtaining information in theauditor's report, such as significant management estimates and judgments made inpreparing the financial statements; areas of high financial statement and audit risk;
significant unusual transactions; and other significant changes in the financial
statements.
32

See Appendix B of AS 1301, which identifies other PCAOB rules andstandards that require audit committee communication, such as AS 2410, Related
Parties, and AS 2502, Auditing Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
33

See, e.g., Section 10A(k) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. 78j-1(k); Rule 207 of Regulation S-X, 17 CFR 210.2-07; and Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, 17 CFR
240.10A-3.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 18

The final standard does not limit the source of critical audit matters to criticalaccounting policies and estimates because the Board does not believe this would be an
appropriate starting point in light of investor interest in a broader range of topics related
to the audit. Additionally, the final standard does not broaden the source, as proposed in2013, to also include matters documented in the engagement completion document andreviewed by the engagement quality reviewer because it is unlikely that a matter that isdetermined to be a critical audit matter would not have already been communicated tothe audit committee.
Some commenters suggested that using audit committee communications as thesource for critical audit matters could impair the relationship between auditor,
management, and the audit committee (e.g., chill communications, give rise to conflict,or cause auditors to communicate more than they otherwise would). However, othercommenters argued that critical audit matters would enhance, not impair,communications between auditors, investors, and those charged with governance(including audit committees). For matters required to be communicated to the audit
committee, the Board believes there should not be a chilling effect or reduced
communications to the audit committee because the requirements for such
communications are not changing. It would seem that any chilling effect would more
likely relate to matters that are not explicitly required to be communicated to the audit
committee, although given the broad requirements of AS 1301 (particularly paragraph.24), the Board believes that there may be few, if any, relevant communications affectedby that possibility.
Some commenters suggested excluding certain required audit committee
communications from the source of critical audit matters, generally because thesecommunications relate to sensitive areas and may result in the auditor communicating
information not disclosed by management. Suggestions included: corrected anduncorrected misstatements, qualitative aspects of significant accounting policies andpractices, alternative treatments within generally accepted accounting principles("GAAP") for policies and practices related to material accounts, violations or possible
violations of law or regulation, independence considerations, disagreements withmanagement, other material written communications between the auditor andmanagement, overall planned audit strategy, delays encountered in the audit, andcompetency issues of management. Other commenters argued that no audit committee
communications should be specifically excluded from consideration as a source ofpotential critical audit matters.
The final standard does not exclude any required audit committee
communications from the source of critical audit matters. To the extent that any such
communication met the critical audit matter definition (including that it (1) relates toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 19

especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment), the Board believes itwill be an appropriate subject for an auditor to communicate as a critical audit matter.
ii.

Relates to Accounts or Disclosures That Are Material to the Financial
Statements

The materiality component of the reproposed definition of critical audit matters—that the matter "relates to accounts or disclosures that are material34 to the financial
statements"— was intended to respond to investor requests for informative and relevant
auditor's reports while, at the same time, addressing other commenters' concerns
regarding auditor communication of immaterial information that management is not
required to disclose under the applicable financial reporting framework and SEC
reporting requirements.
Some investor commenters suggested removing the materiality component of the
reproposed definition of critical audit matters, arguing that it made the definition too
narrow and would unnecessarily exclude relevant information. Some of thesecommenters observed that many cases of material accounting problems or fraud started
as 'immaterial' to the financial statements and built over time, and that such matters
may not meet the reproposed definition of a critical audit matter because of themateriality component.
Other commenters, primarily companies and accounting firms, argued that the
reproposed definition was too broad and suggested modifying the materiality
component such that a critical audit matter would itself have to be material to thefinancial statements as a whole, rather than relating to accounts or disclosures that arematerial to the financial statements. These commenters expressed concern that thephrase "relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements"
could apply to too many matters, resulting in the auditor disclosing immaterial mattersthat would not otherwise be disclosed by management, or give the impression of apiecemeal opinion.

34

The definition of materiality is established under the U.S. federal securities
laws. In interpreting those laws, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that a fact is material
if there is "a substantial likelihood that the . . . fact would have been viewed by thereasonable investor as having significantly altered the 'total mix' of information madeavailable." See TSC Industries v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438, 449 (1976). See also
Basic, Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 231-32 (1988). As the Supreme Court has further
explained, determinations of materiality require "delicate assessments of the inferences
a 'reasonable shareholder' would draw from a given set of facts and the significance of
those inferences to him . . ." TSC Industries, 426 U.S. at 450.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 20After consideration of comments, the Board has determined to adopt themateriality component in the final definition of critical audit matter as reproposed. In the
Board's view, the purpose of the standard—making the auditor's report more useful andinformative to investors—is better served by auditor communication of matters related toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements. As one commenter
noted, limiting the source of critical audit matters and adding a materiality component
that directly relates to accounts and disclosures "would allow the auditor to emphasize
the most important matters to users of the financial statements, and limit the inclusion ofan overabundance of [critical audit matters] within the auditor's report that could
deemphasize their importance."35
At the same time, in the Board's view, limiting critical audit matters to those thatare, in and of themselves, material to the financial statements as a whole would notserve the intended purpose of the standard. If the auditor were required to determinethat a critical audit matter itself is material, rather than related to an account ordisclosure that is material, it is likely that fewer matters would meet the definition of a
critical audit matter and, thus, investors would likely receive less, and less audit-specific,
information than under the standard as adopted.
Accordingly, as in the reproposal, the final standard provides that each critical
audit matter relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial
statements. Consistent with the reproposal, "relates to" clarifies that the critical audit
matter could be a component of a material account or disclosure and does notnecessarily need to correspond to the entire account or disclosure in the financial
statements. For example, the auditor's evaluation of the company's goodwill impairment
assessment could be a critical audit matter if goodwill was material to the financial
statements, even if there was no impairment; it would relate to goodwill recorded on thebalance sheet and the disclosure in the notes to the financial statements about thecompany's impairment policy and goodwill. In addition, a critical audit matter may notnecessarily relate to a single account or disclosure but could have a pervasive effect on
the financial statements if it relates to many accounts or disclosures. For example, theauditor's evaluation of the company's ability to continue as a going concern could also
represent a critical audit matter depending on the circumstances of a particular audit.
On the other hand, a matter that does not relate to accounts or disclosures thatare material to the financial statements cannot be a critical audit matter. For example, apotential loss contingency that was communicated to the audit committee, but that was
35

See letter from Dixon Hughes Goodman, LLP (Aug. 15, 2016) at 2,
available on the Board's website in Docket 034 (also noting that there is a continuingrisk that the auditor could disclose information about the company that was notpreviously disclosed by the company).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 21

determined to be remote and was not recorded in the financial statements or otherwise
disclosed under the applicable financial reporting framework, would not meet thedefinition of a critical audit matter; it does not relate to an account or disclosure in thefinancial statements, even if it involved especially challenging auditor judgment. The
same rationale would apply to a potential illegal act if an appropriate determination had
been made that no disclosure of it was required in the financial statements; the matter
would not relate to an account or disclosure that is material to the financial statements.
For the same reason, the determination that there is a significant deficiency ininternal control over financial reporting, in and of itself, cannot be a critical audit matter;such determination, in and of itself, does not relate to an account or disclosure that ismaterial to the financial statements as no disclosure of the determination is required. A
significant deficiency could, however, be among the principal considerations that led theauditor to determine that a matter is a critical audit matter.36
iii.

Involved Especially Challenging, Subjective, or Complex Auditor
Judgment

Many commenters supported including "matters that involved especiallychallenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment" in the reproposed definition of a
critical audit matter. Other commenters argued that the phrase "especially challenging,
subjective, or complex auditor judgment" is broad and subjective and would lead toinconsistent application of the reproposed definition. For example, some commenters
said that critical audit matters would vary based on the experience and competence of
the auditor, even if the underlying facts and circumstances were the same. One
commenter urged disclosure of the auditor's perspective on material related party
transactions. Another commenter suggested that the standard include a note statingthat it is expected that in most audits, financial statement matters involving theapplication of significant judgment or estimation by management would involve
especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment.
Several commenters suggested using the IAASB's definition of key audit matters,
which includes those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial
statements and that required significant auditor attention. One commenter argued that
this would avoid reliance on the auditor's determination of whether a matter involved
especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment, which the commentersaid would give auditors too much discretion.

36

See section IV.A.2.c.i for additional considerations related to auditor
disclosure of original information.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 22After consideration of comments, the Board is adopting this component of thedefinition of critical audit matter as reproposed, namely "matters that involved especiallychallenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment." This grounds the definition in theauditor's expertise and judgment, which is directly responsive to investor requests for
information from the auditor's point of view. Thus, the Board believes that this definition
will focus critical audit matters in areas where investors will particularly benefit fromexpanded reporting by the auditor.
The determination of critical audit matters is principles-based and the final
standard does not specify any items that would always constitute critical audit matters.
For example, the standard does not provide that all matters determined to be"significant risks" under PCAOB standards would be critical audit matters.37 Somesignificant risks may be determined to be critical audit matters, but not every significant
risk would involve especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment. To
illustrate, improper revenue recognition is a presumed fraud risk and all fraud risks are
significant risks;38 however, if a matter related to revenue recognition does not involve
especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment, it will not be a critical
audit matter. Similarly, the final standard does not provide, as some commenterssuggested, that material related party transactions or matters involving the application ofsignificant judgment or estimation by management always constitute critical audit
matters. The auditor must determine, in the context of the specific audit, that a matter
involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment. In addition,
focusing on auditor judgment should limit the extent to which expanded auditor reporting
could become duplicative of management's reporting. To the extent that critical audit
matters reflect differences in auditors' experience and competence, this in itself should
also be informative.
b.

Factors

The reproposal included the following nonexclusive list of factors for the auditor
to take into account, together with audit-specific factors, when determining whether amatter involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment:a.

The auditor's assessment of the risks of material misstatement,
including significant risks;

37

A significant risk is a "risk of material misstatement that requires special
audit consideration." Paragraph .A5 of AS 2110, Identifying and Assessing Risks ofMaterial Misstatement.
38

See AS 2110.71.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 23b.

The degree of auditor subjectivity in determining or applying audit
procedures to address the matter or in evaluating the results of
those procedures;c.

The nature and extent of audit effort required to address the matter,
including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed or thenature of consultations outside the engagement team regarding thematter;d.

The degree of auditor judgment related to areas in the financial
statements that involved the application of significant judgment or
estimation by management, including estimates with significant
measurement uncertainty;e.

The nature and timing of significant unusual transactions and theextent of audit effort and judgment related to these transactions;andf.

The nature of audit evidence obtained regarding the matter.

Commenters in general agreed that including such factors would assist theauditor in determining critical audit matters.
Some commenters suggested changes to better align the factors with areas ofcomplex management judgment, to reduce the risk that the auditor would be the sourceof original information, to clarify the linkage of procedures performed by the auditor andsufficient appropriate audit evidence obtained in performing those procedures, and to
focus the auditor on the audit procedures executed to obtain sufficient and appropriate
audit evidence rather than audit strategy decisions. Some commenters suggested
harmonizing the factors with the IAASB's factors for determining key audit matters.
After considering the comments received, the Board has modified the factors byreordering them and revising the factor relating to the degree of auditor subjectivity(factor b above) to refer to the application (rather than determination) of audit
procedures, which focuses it more clearly on the performance of the audit rather than
audit strategy.
Some commenters suggested that the factor pertaining to the nature and extent
of the audit effort (factor c) be revised to relate to the nature and extent of audit effort
required to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to address a matter and thefactor pertaining to the nature of audit evidence (factor f) be deleted to clarify thatobtaining audit evidence is a component of audit effort. The final standard does notchange factor c as suggested because it would inappropriately narrow the factor
exclusively to considerations related to obtaining audit evidence rather than the naturePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 24of the overall audit effort. Additionally, the Board determined to retain factor f as astand-alone factor because, as stated in the reproposal, in the limited implementation
trial conducted by several accounting firms, this factor appeared to be one of the mostuseful in determining critical audit matters.39
A commenter recommended including a factor based on the extent of interaction
with the audit committee. The final standard does not include this factor because theextent of interaction might not be a meaningful indicator of the complexity or subjectivityof the matter and it could create incentives to limit communication between the auditor
and the audit committee.
One commenter did not agree with elimination of two proposed factors that
related to the severity of control deficiencies and corrected and uncorrected
misstatements. These factors were eliminated from the reproposal in response tocomments that the factors would lead the auditor to determine matters as critical audit
matters in areas where the company has no existing reporting obligation, or where thecompany has determined that the matters are not material and therefore do not require
disclosure under the financial reporting framework. For these reasons, the final standard
does not include these factors.
Under the final standard, once the auditor identifies a matter communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee that relates to accounts ordisclosures that are material to the company's financial statements, the auditor shouldtake into account the following nonexclusive list of factors, as well as other audit-specificfactors, when determining whether a matter involved especially challenging, subjective,
or complex auditor judgment:a.

The auditor's assessment of the risks of material misstatement, including
significant risks;b.

The degree of auditor judgment related to areas in the financial
statements that involved the application of significant judgment or
estimation by management, including estimates with significant
measurement uncertainty;c.

The nature and timing of significant unusual transactions and the extent ofaudit effort and judgment related to these transactions;39

See letter from the Center for Audit Quality (June 19, 2014) at 5, available
on the Board's website in Docket 034.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 25d.

The degree of auditor subjectivity in applying audit procedures to address
the matter or in evaluating the results of those procedures;e.

The nature and extent of audit effort required to address the matter,
including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed or the natureof consultations outside the engagement team regarding the matter; andf.

The nature of audit evidence obtained regarding the matter.

The determination should be made in the context of the particular audit, with theaim of providing audit-specific information rather than a discussion of generic risks. The
factors provide a principles-based framework for the auditor to use in assessing whether
a matter involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment.
Depending on the matter, the auditor's determination that a matter is a critical audit
matter might be based on one or more of these factors, other factors specific to theaudit, or a combination.
c.

Audit Period Covered by Critical Audit Matters

The reproposal would have required the auditor to communicate critical audit
matters for the audit of the current period's financial statements. Because thecommunication of critical audit matters for prior periods might also be useful to investors
and other financial statement users in certain situations, the reproposed standard
provided that the auditor may communicate critical audit matters relating to a priorperiod when: (1) the prior period's financial statements are made public for the first time,such as in an initial public offering, or (2) issuing an auditor's report on the prior period's
financial statements because the previously issued auditor's report could no longer be
relied upon.
Some commenters generally supported communicating critical audit matters for
only the current period's financial statements or for all periods if audited financial
statements have not been made public previously. Other commenters supported
communication of critical audit matters for all periods presented along with an
explanation if prior year critical audit matters are not repeated in the current year. Yetanother commenter stated that the auditor should be encouraged to use judgment as towhether to include critical audit matters for prior periods and not limit the consideration
only to the circumstances described in the reproposal.
The final standard retains the requirement to communicate critical audit mattersonly for the current audit period. While most companies' financial statements arepresented on a comparative basis, and thus most auditor's reports cover a similar
period, requiring auditors to communicate critical audit matters for the current period,
rather than for all periods presented, will provide relevant information about the mostrecent audit and is intended to reflect a cost-sensitive approach to auditor reporting. In

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 26

addition, investors and other financial statement users will be able to look at prior years'
filings to analyze critical audit matters over time. However, the auditor could choose toinclude critical audit matters for prior periods. The final standard clarifies that the twosituations relating to a prior period are examples rather than the only situations in whicha critical audit matter for a prior period may be communicated.
As noted in the reproposal, if the auditor's report is dual-dated, the auditor will
determine whether the new information for which the auditor's report is dual-dated gives
rise to any additional critical audit matters.
In situations in which a predecessor auditor has been asked to reissue its
auditor's report, the communication of critical audit matters for the prior period need not
be repeated because it is only required for the current year. However, the predecessor
auditor could choose to include prior year critical audit matters in the reissued auditor'sreport.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
IAASB. Under the IAASB's standard, "key audit matters" are defined as thosematters that, in the auditor's professional judgment, were of most significance in theaudit of the financial statements of the current period. Key audit matters are determinedusing a two-step process. First, the auditor identifies the matters communicated withthose charged with governance40 that required significant auditor attention in performing
the audit, taking into account:

Areas of higher assessed risks of material misstatement, or significant
risks;



Significant auditor judgments relating to areas in the financial statementsthat involved significant management judgment, including accounting
estimates that have been identified as having high estimation uncertainty;andThe effect on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred
during the period.41

40

See paragraph 8 of ISA 701. See also ISA 260, Communication withThose Charged with Governance, which provides requirements for auditor
communications with those charged with governance.
41

See paragraph 9 of ISA 701.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 27

Second, of the matters that required significant auditor attention, the auditor
identifies those of most significance in the audit as the key audit matters.42 The IAASB
requires the communication of key audit matters for the current period only.43
EU. The EU requires the auditor to describe the most significant assessed risks
of material misstatement, including assessed risks of material misstatement due tofraud.44 The EU does not specify the period for which these need to be described.
FRC. The FRC requires the auditor to describe the risks of material misstatementthat had the greatest effect on: (1) the overall audit strategy; (2) the allocation of
resources in the audit; and (3) directing the efforts of the engagement team.45 The FRC
does not specify the period for which these need to be described.
2.

Communication of Critical Audit Matters

Under the reproposal, the auditor would have been required to include
introductory language in the auditor's report preceding the communication of critical
audit matters and to communicate critical audit matters by identifying each matter,describing the auditor's principal considerations for determining that the matter was a
critical audit matter, describing how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit,
and referring to the relevant financial statement accounts and disclosures.
Comments varied on the reproposed requirements for communication of critical
audit matters and the level of detail the auditor should provide, including whether theauditor should be permitted to provide information about the company that has not beenpreviously disclosed by the company (which commenters referred to as "original
information"). Commenters generally agreed with identifying each critical audit matterand referring to the relevant financial statement accounts and disclosures. One
commenter suggested removing the requirements to describe the considerations fordetermining that a matter was a critical audit matter and how the critical audit matter
was addressed in the audit. While some commenters stated that the proposed
requirements regarding auditor's communication of critical audit matters are sufficiently
clear, many suggested improvements to some of the components of the communication42

See paragraph 10 of ISA 701.

43

See paragraphs 8 and 10 of ISA 701.

44

See requirements in 2(c) of Article 10, Audit Report, of Regulation (EU) No

537/2014.
45

See paragraph 19A of UK ISA 700 (2013).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 28

requirements. After consideration of comments, the Board has made someenhancements to the communication requirements, as described below.
a.

Introductory Language

The reproposed standard provided introductory language to be included in the"Critical Audit Matters" section of the auditor's report indicating that critical audit matters
did not alter the opinion on the financial statements and that the auditor was notproviding a separate opinion on the critical audit matters. Some commenters supported
the introductory language on the basis that it could minimize users' potential
misunderstanding of the critical audit matters.
Some commenters suggested additions to the introductory language toemphasize that critical audit matters are subjective and may not represent the mostimportant aspects of the financial statements, to clarify that the description ofprocedures should not be taken as indicative of results of any individual procedure, or tolimit reliance on critical audit matters by adding language similar to that used in a reporton an audit of internal control over financial reporting ("ICFR").46 The introductorylanguage in the final standard does not include the suggested additions because suchlanguage could be interpreted as disclaiming or inappropriately minimizing thecommunication of critical audit matters.
Other commenters suggested minor revisions in the introductory language torefer to the "communication of critical audit matters" rather than the critical audit mattersthemselves. In response to this comment, the required introductory language in the final
standard has been revised as follows (additions are underlined and deletions are struck
through):
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from thecurrent period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2)involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The
46

The auditor's report on the audit of internal control over financial reporting
requires a paragraph stating that, "because of inherent limitations, internal control overfinancial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and that projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate." See paragraph .85j of AS 2201, An
Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit ofFinancial Statements.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 29

communication of Ccritical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on
the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we do are not, by communicating
the critical audit matters below, provide providing separate opinions on the critical
audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
b.

Communication Requirements

The reproposal required that, for each critical audit matter, the auditor would:

Identify the critical audit matter;

Describe the principal considerations that led the auditor to determine thatthe matter is a critical audit matter;

Describe how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit; and

Refer to the relevant financial statement accounts and disclosures that
relate to the critical audit matter.

As discussed in more detail below, these requirements have been adopted
substantially as reproposed.47
Identify the Critical Audit Matter and Describe the Principal Considerations that
Led the Auditor to Determine that the Matter is a Critical Audit Matter
Many commenters who addressed this topic supported the identification of thecritical audit matter and limiting the description to "the principal considerations" that led
the auditor to determine that the matter is a critical audit matter, and those aspects ofthe communication requirements are adopted as reproposed. The auditor's descriptionof the principal considerations should be specific to the circumstances and provide aclear, concise, and understandable discussion of why the matter involved especially47

The reproposing release included two illustrative examples of thecommunication of critical audit matters. See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Section
IV.A.2.b. Given the principles-based nature of the requirements for critical audit mattersand the objective of providing tailored, audit-specific information, the examples wereintended to function as illustrations of how critical audit matters could be communicated,and not as templates for how critical audit matters should be communicated. Comments
received on these examples were taken into account in the Board’s consideration of the
final standard. Illustrative examples do not appear in the adopting release because theBoard believes auditors should provide tailored, audit-specific information whencommunicating critical audit matters in the auditor’s report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 30

challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment. It is expected that thecommunication will be tailored to the audit to avoid standardized language and to reflect
the specific circumstances of the matter.
Describe How the Critical Audit Matter was Addressed in the Audit
The reproposed standard included a new requirement for the auditor to describe
how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit. While the standard did not
specify how this should be done, the reproposing release provided four examples ofpotential approaches to such descriptions: (1) the auditor's response or approach thatwas most relevant to the matter; (2) a brief overview of the procedures performed; (3)an indication of the outcome of the auditor's procedures; and (4) key observations withrespect to the matter, or some combination of these elements.48
Many commenters were supportive of a requirement to describe how each critical
audit matter was addressed in the audit. Some commenters asserted that a descriptionof how a critical audit matter was addressed would benefit investors by providing
insights on how and on what basis the auditor developed the opinion or the rigor that
underlies the audit procedures performed. For example, one investor commenter statedthat including audit procedures in the description of a critical audit matter would makethe auditor's report more informative and useful. Several investors suggested that theauditor should be required or encouraged to provide informative, company-specificfindings when describing how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit, suchas whether management's significant accounting estimates and judgments werebalanced, mildly optimistic, or mildly pessimistic.
One commenter suggested that the description of how the critical audit matter
was addressed in the audit should be optional. Several commenters objected to theauditor including audit procedures in the description of critical audit matters because it
would not provide any incremental value or actionable information to investors,
investors may not have the expertise or context to understand audit procedures, or thedescription of audit procedures would become boilerplate. One commenter suggested
adding a note to clarify that the purpose of describing audit procedures is to provide
information about the audit but not specific details that would compromise theeffectiveness of audit procedures. Other commenters suggested that only the principal
audit procedures should be provided.

48

These elements are similar to the IAASB's elements described inparagraph A46 of ISA 701. The EU also requires that the auditor describe key
observations with respect to the most significant assessed risks of material
misstatement.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 31

The final standard includes the requirement for the auditor to describe how thecritical audit matter was addressed in the audit because it is consistent with the Board's
objective of providing more information about the audit and, if developed with anappropriate focus on the intended audience, should be of interest to users. Similar to
the reproposal, the final standard does not prescribe a specific way to meet thisrequirement. Several commenters suggested that the four examples provided in the
reproposing release be included in the standard because they provide helpful guidanceon how the requirement could be met. The final standard includes a note incorporatingthese examples, which should clarify the Board's expectations while providing flexibility
in describing how a critical audit matter was addressed in the audit.
While the description of how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit
will require judgment, the auditor should bear in mind that the intent of communicating
critical audit matters is to provide information about the audit of the company's financial
statements that will be useful to investors. A brief overview of the audit procedures
performed is one of the alternatives for describing how the critical audit matter wasaddressed. If the auditor chooses to describe audit procedures, the descriptions are
expected to be at a level that investors and other financial statement users would
understand. In addition, as the four examples should make clear, the objective is toprovide a useful summary, not to detail every aspect of how the matter was addressedin the audit. Limiting the use of highly technical accounting and auditing terms in thedescription of critical audit matters, particularly if the auditor chooses to describe audit
procedures, may help financial statement users better understand these matters in
relation to the audit of the financial statements.
In its comment letter, a working group of the IAG stressed the importance toinvestors of auditor findings, which they described as "the one item that [they] believe
would provide the greatest value to investors."49 Acknowledging the difficulty of
mandating reporting of findings, the working group recommended that the Board
encourage auditors to include them voluntarily. Under the final standard, communicationof the auditor's findings is not required; however, in describing the audit response, theauditor may choose to include findings as an indication of the outcome of audit
procedures or key observations about a matter. The Board shares the working group'sview that the inclusion of informative, company-specific audit findings related to critical
audit matters may, in appropriate circumstances, be valuable to investors andencourages auditors to consider including such findings in their auditor's reports.
However, in describing findings, the language used should not imply that the auditor is49

Letter from the IAG's auditor's report working group (Aug. 15, 2016) at 1,
available on the Board's website in Docket 034. The working group made a presentation
regarding its comment letter at the IAG meeting in October 2016, available on the
Board's website.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 32

providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts ordisclosures to which they relate.
Refer to the Relevant Financial Statement Accounts or Disclosures that Relate to
the Critical Audit Matter
The reproposed standard would have required the auditor to refer to the relevant
financial statement accounts and disclosures that relate to the critical audit matter.
There were few comments on this requirement. One commenter suggested that, toavoid duplication, reference should be made only to the disclosures and not thefinancial statement accounts. In response to this suggestion, the final standard clarifies
that the auditor could refer to either the relevant account or disclosure, rather than both,to avoid potential duplication.
The reproposal also solicited comment on whether, in addition to referring to therelevant financial statement accounts and disclosures, the auditor should refer torelevant disclosures outside the financial statements. Commenters that addressed thisquestion generally opposed the auditor referencing disclosures outside the financial
statements when describing a critical audit matter because it may incorrectly suggestthat such information is audited or cause readers to misinterpret the auditor's role inrelation to such information. The final standard only requires the auditor to refer to therelevant financial statement accounts or disclosures.
c.

Additional Considerations Related to the Communication Requirementsi.

Auditor Disclosure of "Original Information" about the Company

The reproposed standard included a note to indicate that, when describing critical
audit matters in the auditor's report, the auditor is not expected to provide original
information unless it is necessary to describe the principal considerations that led theauditor to determine that a matter is a critical audit matter or how the matter wasaddressed in the audit.
Investor commenters, including the auditor's report working group of the IAG,
argued that there should not be any limitation on the auditor providing original
information and that the reproposal went too far in constraining the auditor fromproviding original information in response to concerns expressed by other commenters(which were primarily companies and accounting firms).
Other commenters expressed the view that auditors should not provide original
information about the company or should be limited to providing information about theaudit and not the company. These commenters stated that the auditor providing original
information about the company would be inconsistent with the traditional U.S. regulatory
framework, whereby management provides information about the company and thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 33

auditor attests to compliance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
However, one investor commenter noted that auditor reporting should not be limited by"original information," a term that is undefined in auditing literature.
No PCAOB standard, SEC rule, or other financial reporting requirement prohibits
auditor reporting of information that management has not previously disclosed. Rather,
there are areas under current law and auditing standards that require auditor reportingthat goes beyond attesting to the compliance of management disclosures (e.g.,
substantial doubt about a company's ability to continue as a going concern50 or illegal
acts51). As discussed in more detail below, auditors may have professional or state law
obligations to maintain client confidentiality, but these obligations should not apply to, or
should be preempted by, reporting obligations arising under federal law and regulations,
including under PCAOB standards.52 Accordingly, the requirement to communicate
critical audit matters is not, as some commenters have suggested, inconsistent with theexisting U.S. financial reporting framework and auditors' other obligations.
Commenters also said that the role of the audit committee or management would
be undermined by requiring the auditor to disclose information about the company's
financial statements, since in their view it is solely management's responsibility todetermine what disclosure is appropriate. Several commenters stated that thecommunication of critical audit matters would give auditors leverage to encourage
disclosure of information by management, and that management would likely modify its
disclosure in response to the communication of critical audit matters in the auditor'sreport so the auditor would not be a source of original information. While somecommenters said that this would improve management disclosures, others said it would
be an inappropriate expansion of the auditor's role or would add significant costs. Other50

See AS 2415, Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going
Concern. The auditor is required to include a going concern explanatory paragraph if
the auditor concludes that substantial doubt exists about the entity's ability to continue
as a going concern for a reasonable period of time (see AS 2415.12). If management's
disclosure with respect to the company's ability to continue as a going concern isinadequate, the auditor's reporting responsibility regarding going concern remains andthe report includes either a qualified or an adverse opinion (see AS 2415.14).
51

Auditors may be required, under certain circumstances, pursuant to thePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (codified in Section 10A(b)1 of the
Exchange Act), to make a report to the SEC relating to an illegal act that has a material
effect on the financial statements.
52

For a more detailed discussion of liability considerations related to critical
audit matters, see Section IV.A.4.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 34

commenters stated that companies could be harmed by the disclosure of confidential orcompetitively sensitive information. Another commenter expressed concern thatinvestors could be confused or misled if auditor reporting lacked context or appeared toconflict with management disclosures. One commenter suggested that the auditor
should disclose original information only if a disclosure matter continues to be
unresolved after discussion with management and the audit committee.
The Board acknowledges these concerns and, in developing the auditor's
communication requirements, has sought to strike an appropriate balance between
investor demands for expanded auditor reporting and the costs and potential
unintended consequences associated with providing it. While auditor reporting oforiginal information is not prohibited, it is limited to areas uniquely within the perspectiveof the auditor: describing the principal considerations that led the auditor to determinethat the matter is a critical audit matter and how the matter was addressed in the audit.
The objective of critical audit matters—helping investors to focus on identified areas of
the audit and understand how the auditor addressed them—may not be accomplished if
the auditor is prohibited from providing such information. Moreover, prohibiting theauditor from providing such information could make critical audit matter communications
incomplete in a way that could be confusing to or misunderstood by investors.
It seems likely, as one commenter observed, that auditors will generally not have
incentives to provide information about the company that the company has not alreadymade public. Another commenter noted that, in current practice, disclosure is alreadyguided by an iterative process between management and the auditor, and expected thata similar process would occur for critical audit matters, reducing the likelihood that theauditor would be a source of original information since critical audit matters would likely
overlap with increased management disclosure.53 To the extent that an auditor's
decision to communicate a critical audit matter incents the company to expand or
supplement its own disclosure, the Board believes this may improve the quality of public
disclosures, which would be an indirect benefit of the standard. However, if thecompany does not provide additional disclosure, and the information is necessary todescribe the principal considerations that led the auditor to determine that the matter isa critical audit matter or how it was addressed in the audit, the Board believes it is in the
public interest for the auditor to include that information in the auditor's report. The final
standard therefore retains the note from the reproposal explaining that the auditor is notexpected to provide information about the company that has not been made publicly
available by the company unless such information is necessary to describe the principal
53

It should be noted, however, that critical audit matters are not a substitutefor disclosures required of the company under the applicable financial reporting
framework.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 35

considerations that led the auditor to determine that a matter is a critical audit matter or
how the matter was addressed in the audit.
Of course, any matter that will be communicated as a critical audit matter will
already have been discussed with the audit committee, and the auditor will be required
to provide a draft of the auditor's report to the audit committee and discuss the draft withthem.54 In addition, as the auditor determines how best to comply with thecommunication requirements, the auditor could discuss with management and the audit
committee the treatment of any sensitive information.
Some commenters also stated that, in areas where there are specific reporting
obligations under the applicable financial reporting framework or SEC reporting
requirements but the matter falls below the disclosure threshold (for example, asignificant deficiency), auditor communication could, in effect, impose a lower disclosure
threshold. With regard to such areas, it is likely that the nature of a critical audit matterand its description would be broader than, for instance, focusing on a significant
deficiency. In addition, while the auditor is required to describe the principal
considerations that led the auditor to determine that the matter is a critical audit matter,(which may include, if relevant, information about the company's processes andcontrols) and how the overall matter was addressed, it is not necessary for the auditor's
description to use the terminology of the other auditing standard, such as "significant
deficiency" within the broader context of a critical audit matter. For example, if asignificant deficiency was among the principal considerations in determining thatrevenue recognition was a critical audit matter, the auditor would describe the relevant
control-related issues over revenue recognition in the broader context of the critical
audit matter without using the term "significant deficiency."55
Some commenters suggested that any expanded disclosure requirements shouldcome from the SEC and the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), in theform of additional management disclosures, rather than from the Board expanding
requirements for auditor reporting. However, investors have consistently asked to hearmore from the auditor, an independent third-party expert whose work is undertaken for
the investor's benefit. As one commenter noted, the auditor is best suited to provide
insights on how and on what basis the auditor developed its opinion. The final standard
is designed to elicit information about the audit directly from the auditor's perspective.

54
55

See AS 1301.21, as amended.

It should be noted that the determination that a matter was a significant
deficiency in internal control over financial reporting, on its own, could not be a critical
audit matter. See Section IV.A.1.a.ii.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 36

If auditors can adequately convey to investors the principal considerations andhow the auditor addressed the matter without including previously undisclosed
information, it is expected that they will. However, the standard provides that even whenmanagement has not disclosed information, the auditor is not constrained fromproviding such information if it is necessary to describe the principal considerations that
led the auditor to determine that a matter is a critical audit matter or how the matter wasaddressed in the audit.
The Board intends to monitor implementation of the critical audit matter
requirements to determine if additional guidance is needed in this area.
ii.

Potential Compliance Issues Related to Critical Audit Matters

Some commenters suggested that the reporting of critical audit matters could
create compliance challenges for companies.
Two commenters expressed concern that companies' SEC filings may have to beamended because of changes in the description or reporting of critical audit matters. In
principle, auditors should approach errors and misstatements in the communication ofcritical audit matters in the same way they would approach any other error or
misstatement in the auditor's report that does not affect the auditor's opinion or theability of market participants to rely on the opinion.56 It appears that under current
practice, SEC filings have been amended solely to correct errors in auditor's reports,such as incorrect auditor's report dates or missing explanatory paragraphs.
Another commenter expressed concern that management may be asked torespond to investor questions regarding issues described in critical audit matters andmay not be in a position to do so, particularly in light of their responsibilities under
Regulation FD. Given the auditor's responsibility to communicate with the audit
committee, and the likelihood of extensive discussions between auditors andmanagement regarding critical audit matters, it seems likely that management will be
prepared to respond appropriately and in compliance with their legal obligations(including Regulation FD), as they would with regard to any other question about
information included in an SEC filing.
d.

Ability to Communicate No Critical Audit Matters

The reproposal provided that the auditor could determine there were no critical
audit matters and provide a statement to that effect in the auditor's report. Commenters
56

The final standard indicates that the auditor's communication of critical
audit matters does not alter in any way the auditor's opinion on the financial statements,
taken as a whole.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 37

generally supported the auditor's ability to determine that there are no critical audit
matters. Two commenters suggested that the auditor should not have to make astatement in the auditor's report that there were no critical audit matters because theabsence of a critical audit matter should be sufficient without the definitive statement,
similar to an emphasis paragraph. The final standard includes the possibility that theauditor could determine, and state in the auditor's report, that there are no critical audit
matters.57 The statement that there are no critical audit matters is required because
unlike an emphasis paragraph, critical audit matters are a required element of theauditor's report.
The determination of critical audit matters is based on the facts andcircumstances of each audit. The Board expects that, in most audits to which therequirement to communicate critical audit matters applies, the auditor will determine thatat least one matter involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor
judgment. There may be critical audit matters even in an audit of a company with limited
operations or activities. However, there may be circumstances in which the auditor
determines there are no matters that meet the definition of a critical audit matter and, in
those circumstances, the auditor will communicate that there were no critical audit
matters.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
IAASB. For each key audit matter, the IAASB requires the auditor to reference
the related disclosures, if any, in the financial statements and address: (1) why thematter was considered to be one of most significance in the audit and therefore
determined to be a key audit matter and (2) how the matter was addressed in theaudit.58 The IAASB allows the auditor to determine that there are no key audit matters tocommunicate in the auditor's report and, if so, requires a statement to this effect.59
EU. The EU requires the auditor to include in the auditor's report: (1) adescription of the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement, including
assessed risks of material misstatement due to fraud; (2) a summary of the auditor's
57

Since communication of critical audit matters will not be required for theaudits of EGCs, brokers and dealers reporting under Exchange Act Rule 17a-5, 17 CFR
240.17a-5, investment companies other than business development companies, andbenefit plans, the auditor's report for the audits of these entities will not be required toinclude the statement that there are no critical audit matters.
58

See paragraph 13 of ISA 701.

59

See paragraphs 14 and 16 of ISA 701.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 38

response to the risks; and (3) where relevant, key observations arising with respect tothe risks.60
FRC. The FRC requires the auditor, among other things, to: (1) describe those
assessed risks of material misstatement that were identified by the auditor and (2)provide an overview of the scope of the audit, including an explanation of how the scope
addressed the assessed risks of material misstatement.61 The explanations of thematters set out in the auditor's report should be described in a way that: (1) enables auser to understand their significance in the context of the audit of the financial
statements as a whole and not as discrete opinions on separate elements of thefinancial statements; (2) enables the matters to be related directly to the specificcircumstances of the audited entity and are not therefore generic or abstract mattersexpressed in standardized language; and (3) complements the description of significant
issues required to be made by the audit committee.62
3.

Documentation of Critical Audit Matters

The reproposed standard required documentation of the basis for the auditor's
determination whether each matter that both: (1) was communicated or required to becommunicated to the audit committee and (2) relates to accounts or disclosures that arematerial to the financial statements, involved or did not involve especially challenging,
subjective, or complex auditor judgment. Some commenters supported a documentation
requirement only for matters that were determined to be critical audit matters. Some ofthese commenters asserted that documentation about matters determined not to be
critical audit matters would add costs and primarily benefit PCAOB inspections rather
than audit quality. Others stated that the requirement is not aligned with the IAASB's
documentation requirement, which, in their view, focuses on rationale for inclusion as a
key audit matter rather than exclusion. However, another commenter argued that thedetermination that a matter was not a critical audit matter would seem to be an
important audit judgment that ought to be documented for review by the engagement
quality reviewer. This commenter suggested that documentation be required only formatters required to be communicated to the audit committee (which would already havebeen documented) and not for those that are communicated otherwise. One auditor
argued that the reproposed requirement would lead auditors to document all audit
committee communications even if not required, and that this would disproportionately
60

See requirements in 2(c) of Article 10, Audit Report, of Regulation (EU) No

537/2014.
61

See paragraph 19A of UK ISA 700 (2013).

62

See paragraph 19B of UK ISA 700 (2013).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 39

affect smaller companies whose audit committees more commonly request information
not required to be communicated under PCAOB standards.
The final standard substantially retains the approach from the reproposal of
requiring the auditor to document the basis for determining critical audit matters.63 The
objective of the requirement is to document how the determination of critical audit
matters (or the determination that there are no critical audit matters) was made fromamong the matters communicated or required to be communicated to the audit
committee that relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial
statements. The documentation requirement will also facilitate review by theengagement quality reviewer.64
The amount of documentation required could vary with the circumstances. For
example, the auditor's basis for the determination may be so clear for some matters thata single sentence will be sufficient. This situation may arise, for instance, when theauditor's documentation prepared in the course of the audit includes sufficient detailabout whether or not the matter involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex
auditor judgment. Other matters may require more extensive documentation.
As noted in the reproposing release, for matters determined to be critical audit
matters, the description in the auditor's report (which, among other things, mustdescribe the principal considerations that led the auditor to determine that it was a
critical audit matter) will generally suffice as documentation.
The auditor could comply with the documentation requirement in a variety ofdifferent ways. For example, the auditor could start with the communications to the audit
committee, which are already documented, identify which of those matters relate toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements, and then document
the basis for the auditor's determination of whether or not each matter involved
especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment. In documenting thebasis for the determination, the auditor may include the factors the auditor took into
account. This documentation may be prepared as an extension to the audit committee
documentation or the auditor may prepare separate documentation.
63

The language of the documentation requirements has been redrafted to
improve clarity, based on a commenter's suggestion.
64

Under the existing audit documentation requirements, audit
documentation facilitates the planning, performance, and supervision of theengagement, and is the basis for the review of the quality of the work because it
provides the reviewer with written documentation of the evidence supporting theauditor's significant conclusions. See paragraph .02 of AS 1215, Audit Documentation.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 40

Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The IAASB requires the auditor to document the matters that required significant
auditor attention and the rationale for the auditor's determination as to whether or noteach of these matters is a key audit matter.65 The EU does not include documentation
requirements for expanded auditor reporting. The FRC does not include specificdocumentation requirements related to expanded auditor reporting.66
4.

Liability Considerations Related to Critical Audit Matters

In both the proposal and the reproposal, the Board acknowledged that including
critical audit matters would change the auditor's report in ways that could affect auditors'
potential liability. As discussed in those releases, liability may be imposed on auditors
under a number of different legal theories depending on the specific facts andcircumstances of a particular case, including pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities
Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and various state law causes of action.
The critical audit matters would themselves be new statements that could be the basis
for asserted claims. In addition, information provided regarding critical audit matters
could affect other aspects of securities fraud claims against either the issuer, theauditor, or both (for example, by being described in pleadings in an effort to plead fraudwith particularity or as a basis to seek to undercut a claim of reliance). The Board
specifically sought comment on what effect the communication of critical audit matterswould have on private liability and whether there were any steps the Board could or
should take to address any likelihood of an increase in potential liability in private
litigation.
A number of companies and accountants responded to this request for comment.
While several of these commenters noted that changes from the proposal had
addressed certain of their liability concerns, most continued to express varying degrees
of concern about the potential for increased liability, either for auditors or for bothauditors and companies.
In particular, commenters expressed concern that investors who suffer a financial
loss could assert legal claims against the auditor based on statements made in
identifying and describing critical audit matters. As with the proposal, commenters
expressed general concerns that communication of critical audit matters would
encourage baseless litigation, would likely lead to increased audit fees, raise the65
66

See paragraph 18(a) of ISA 701.

General documentation requirements appear in ISA (UK and Ireland) 230,
Audit Documentation.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 41settlement value of spurious claims, or potentially undermine the stringent pleading
standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which were intended
to curtail non-meritorious claims against auditors and avoid the costs and burdens
associated with them. Some commenters argued that auditors, to avoid being secondguessed, would have the incentive to communicate matters to the audit committee thatwere not otherwise required or to identify too many critical audit matters in an effort toprotect themselves from liability. Several commenters expressed concern that
communicating critical audit matters might compromise their ability to argue that thestatements in the audit report are opinions which, one commenter argued, were "lessvulnerable to challenges that they are false or misleading."67 However, at least one ofthese commenters noted that the revised definition of a critical audit matter in the
reproposal mitigated their concern on that point. Other commenters argued that the
information communicated in describing critical audit matters could potentially be used
to attack the audit by challenging the procedures performed or the adequacy of audit
evidence obtained by the auditor. On the other hand, one commenter noted that thecommunication of critical audit matters is about disclosure of risks and challenges andexpressed the belief that non-communication of such matters would be more
problematic from a litigation point of view.
Some commenters argued that the risk of liability would be heightened if theauditor were providing original information about the company. In particular, several
commenters contended that doing so would conflict with accountants' professional
obligation to maintain client information in confidence, which could give rise to claims by
the company against the auditor under state law.
Some commenters argued that critical audit matters could increase litigation risk
for companies as well as the auditor because the new statements required of theauditor could form a basis for new legal claims, could be misinterpreted as acts ofnegligence on the part of the company, or could be used by plaintiffs as a "road map"
for litigation against the company. One commenter argued that, because the underlying
work papers are subject to discovery, critical audit matters would be used as a sourcefor potential litigation against both auditors and companies.
Some of the commenters that expressed concerns about the potential forincreased auditor liability also suggested changes to the reproposal that they
maintained would reduce the liability impact of determining and communicating critical
audit matters. For example, as previously discussed, several commenters suggested
substantially similar changes to modify the materiality component of the definition of
67

Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Aug. 15, 2016) at 7, available
on the Board's website in Docket 034.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 42

critical audit matters and to prohibit or discourage auditor communication of original
information.68
The Board has carefully considered commenters' concerns about potential
liability throughout this standard-setting process, including the comments received on
the reproposal. While mandating disclosure of critical audit matters will, by design, entail
new statements in the auditor's report, the Board notes that any claim based on these
new statements would have to establish all of the elements of the relevant cause ofaction (for example, when applicable, loss causation and reliance). Critical audit matterswill not replace or alter the fundamental requirement that the auditor's report include theauditor's opinion that the financial statements are fairly presented in accordance withthe applicable financial reporting framework, which has been, and the Board expects
will continue to be, the primary statement at issue in most private securities litigation
under federal law involving auditors.
Throughout this standard-setting process, the Board has carefully consideredcommenters' suggestions to alter the terms of its proposal to mitigate their concerns
about potential liability for omitting a critical audit matter. As discussed in the
reproposal, the Board limited and clarified the process for determining critical audit
matters, including by narrowing the source of critical audit matters to matterscommunicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee, adding amateriality component to the critical audit matter definition, and refining the factors used
to determine critical audit matters. Those changes, as well as the critical audit matter
definition's focus on the auditor's judgment, should mitigate concerns about potential
liability for omitting a critical audit matter. With respect to suggestions to further narrow
the definition of critical audit matters and the related communication requirements, it is
not clear, and commenters did not explain, how those changes would mitigate liability
concerns other than by reducing the number and content of required communications ofcritical audit matters. As described above, the Board has determined not to incorporate
those suggested changes because they appear likely to significantly reduce the numberof potential critical audit matters and the informativeness of auditor communication ofcritical audit matters.
With respect to potential state law claims by companies against their auditors fordisclosing original information, the Board notes that, as discussed above, it does notexpect that, in general, critical audit matters will provide sensitive information that has
not been disclosed by the company. With respect to the potential for a claim based on asituation in which the auditor found such disclosure necessary, the Board notes that
auditors already have preexisting duties to disclose original information in certain68

See discussion at Sections IV.A.1.a.ii and IV.A.2.c above.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 43
circumstances.69 Commenters did not cite any specific examples in which theserequirements have resulted in unwarranted claims against auditors for disclosing client
confidences. Because the auditor's obligations under PCAOB standards arise underfederal law and regulations, professional or state law duties of client confidentiality
should not apply to,70 or should be preempted by,71 the obligation to communicate
critical audit matters.72
While the Board takes seriously the prospect of potential increases in auditors' orcompanies' liability, the Board believes it has appropriately addressed commenters'
concerns regarding liability in a manner compatible with the objectives of this69

For example, for at least the last 20 years, auditors have had duties todisclose in their auditor's reports when they have substantial doubt about the company's
ability to continue as a going concern. See Section 10A of the Exchange Act and AS
2415. In addition, when in an audit of internal control over financial reporting, the auditor
identifies a material weakness that has not been included in management's
assessment, the auditor must modify its report to, among other things, "include a
description of the material weakness, which should provide the users of the audit reportwith specific information about the nature of the material weakness and its actual andpotential effect on the presentation of the company's financial statements . . .". See
Note to paragraph .91 of AS 2201; cf. Statement of Gaylen R. Hansen, CPA, at the
PCAOB public meeting (Apr. 2, 2014) ("Client confidentiality has a long-standing andimportant place in the accountancy profession. However, it doesn't serve investors wellwhen it is parlayed to obfuscate the important obligation to call things as they are
seen.").
70

For example, the relevant AICPA rule provides that auditors "shall notdisclose any confidential client information without the specific consent of the client," butfurther provides that the confidentiality obligation shall not be construed "to prohibit …
compliance with applicable laws and government regulations." See paragraphs .01 and.02 of 1.700.001 Confidential Client Information Rule of the AICPA Code of Professional
Conduct (as of Dec. 15, 2014).
71

See Crosby v. Nat'l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363, 372-73 (2000);
New York v. FCC, 486 U.S. 57, 64 (1988).
72

Some commenters suggested that safe harbor rules be created to protect
auditors and companies from liability for statements about critical audit matters. While,
as noted above, the Board will monitor the effects of critical audit matters should therequirements be approved by the SEC, the Board is not convinced at this time that any
such safe harbor is necessary and, in any event, such a safe harbor is beyond theBoard's authority.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 44

rulemaking, and in view of the rulemaking's anticipated benefits. Indeed, the Board
notes that at least one of the commenters that expressed concern about potential
liability, noted that those concerns "should not stand in the way of moving forward" on
the reproposed standard.73 At the same time, the Board acknowledges that a variety ofclaims can be raised related to the statements in the audit report and that litigation isinherently uncertain. If the final standard is approved by the SEC, the Board will monitor
the standard after implementation for any unintended consequences.
B.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The reproposal provided a list of basic elements to be included in every auditor'sreport. Some of these basic elements, such as auditor tenure, would be new elementsin the auditor's report. Other basic elements, such as the auditor's opinion, identificationof the financial statements audited, and management's and auditor's responsibilities,
were drawn from the existing auditor reporting standard.74 Yet other basic elements,
such as the name of the company under audit and the date of the financial statements,
were incorporated from existing illustrative auditor's reports.
1.

Auditor Tenure

The reproposal included a required statement in the auditor's report of the year
the auditor began serving consecutively as the company's auditor. The Board alsosought comment on whether auditor tenure should be disclosed in Form AP, Auditor
Reporting of Certain Audit Participants ("Form AP"), rather than in the auditor's report.75a.

Disclosure of Tenure

Investor commenters stated that information regarding auditor tenure would be
useful to financial statement users, for example, in deciding whether to vote to ratify theappointment of the auditor. Investors that expressed a preference supported tenure73

See letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP (Aug. 12, 2016) at 5, available on
the Board's website in Docket 034.
74
75

See existing AS 3101.06–.08.

In December 2015, the Board adopted Form AP, which provides investors
and other financial statement users with information about engagement partners andother accounting firms that participate in audits of issuers. See Improving theTransparency of Audits: Rules to Require Disclosure of Certain Audit Participants on a
New PCAOB Form and Related Amendments to Auditing Standards, PCAOB Release
No. 2015-008 (Dec. 15, 2015).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 45

disclosure in the auditor's report, some on the basis of reducing investor search costs
by ensuring a consistent location for the disclosure. One commenter representing agroup of investors asserted that since the auditor's report is the primary means by which
the auditor communicates with investors, it is appropriate for auditor tenure to be
included in the auditor's report. This commenter further stated that disclosure of auditor
tenure on Form AP would be an acceptable alternative to disclosure in the auditor'sreport only if the timeliness, accessibility, searchability, and overall functionality of theinformation disclosed on Form AP were at least equivalent to having the information
disclosed in the auditor's report. Another commenter suggested that, if disclosure wererequired in the auditor's report, a specific location should be designated.
Currently, information about auditor tenure is not required to be communicated toinvestors by the auditor, management, or the audit committee.76 However, there is a
growing trend toward voluntary disclosure of auditor tenure. Recent analysis ofcorporate proxy statements for annual meetings of shareholders has found that a
growing number of companies are disclosing auditor tenure,77 presumably due tointerest from investors. However, voluntary disclosure is not provided for a significant
number of audits subject to the Board's jurisdiction. Additionally, if disclosed, suchinformation may not be provided in the same location in the proxy statement; for76

In certain instances, investors may be able to manually calculate tenure by
reviewing company filings on the SEC's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis andRetrieval system ("EDGAR") to determine when a company changed auditors.
However, the information is not available prior to 1994 and may not be available forcertain entities, such as investment companies and brokers and dealers, that are notrequired to file Form 8-K. See 17 CFR 249.308, Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant'sCertifying Accountant. Accordingly, currently available information is neither complete
nor a readily accessible alternative to auditor tenure disclosure.
77

The Center for Audit Quality, together with Audit Analytics, reviewed
corporate proxies filed through the end of June 2016, 2015, and 2014 of 1,500 Standard
and Poor's ("S&P") Composite companies. Their analysis identified that in 2016, 2015,
and 2014 auditor tenure was disclosed in the annual proxy statements of 59, 54, and 47
percent of the S&P 500 large-cap companies, respectively, 45, 44, and 42 percent of
the S&P MidCap 400 companies, respectively, and 48, 46, and 50 percent of the S&P
SmallCap 600 companies, respectively. See Center for Audit Quality and Audit
Analytics, 2016 Audit Committee Transparency Barometer (Nov. 2016). Separately,
during their review of proxy statements of Fortune 100 companies, Ernst & Young
identified that 63 percent of the companies reviewed voluntarily disclosed auditor tenure
in 2016 compared to 62 percent in 2015, 51 percent in 2014, 29 percent in 2013, and 24
percent in 2012. See Ernst & Young, Audit Committee Reporting to Shareholders in2016 (Sept. 2016).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 46

instance, some disclosures are in the audit committee report while others are in anothersection of the proxy.78 Further, the proxy rules do not apply to all companies required to
be audited under PCAOB standards; for example, foreign private issuers, many
companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange, and mostinvestment companies are not required to prepare proxy statements.
Some commenters, primarily companies, did not support disclosure of auditor
tenure in the auditor's report on the basis that such disclosure would not provide value
to investors. Other companies and accounting firms raised a concern that tenure
disclosure could result in inferences that, in their view, would be inappropriate about
correlations between auditor tenure and audit quality, or between auditor tenure andauditor independence. Some commenters also suggested that auditor tenure is a
corporate governance matter and that disclosure should be provided by management or
the audit committee rather than the auditor. A few commenters suggested that tenure
disclosure should be addressed by SEC rulemaking or provided only voluntarily. Some
commenters, many of whom generally opposed auditor tenure disclosure, suggested
that Form AP would be a preferable location for disclosing tenure if the Board
proceeded with requiring the disclosure.
The SEC's Investor Advocate stated that he "strongly support[s] requirements for
public disclosure of auditor tenure," recognizing that there were different opinions about
the best party and location to make that disclosure.79 Noting that the SEC had issued aconcept release asking whether auditor tenure should be disclosed in the audit
committee report,80 the SEC's Investor Advocate stated that he believed the SEC
should ultimately decide these questions. In light of these considerations, the SEC's
Investor Advocate recommended that the PCAOB act to require disclosure of auditor
tenure (either in the auditor's report or in Form AP), but also consider including acontingent sunset clause such that the auditor disclosure requirement would expire if
and when the SEC imposed any form of a company disclosure requirement.
78

See Center for Audit Quality and Audit Analytics, 2016 Audit Committee
Transparency Barometer (Nov. 2016).
79

See letter from Rick A. Fleming, Investor Advocate, SEC (Aug. 15, 2016)
at 4, available on the Board's website in Docket 034. The letter noted that the views of
the Investor Advocate do not necessarily reflect the views of the SEC, theCommissioners, or staff of the SEC, and the SEC disclaims responsibility for the letterand all analyses, findings, and conclusions contained therein. Additional information
about the Office of the Investor Advocate is available on the SEC's website.
80

See SEC, Possible Revisions to Audit Committee Disclosures, Exchange
Act Release No. 75344 (July 1, 2015), 80 FR 38995 (July 8, 2015).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 47

The Board believes that public disclosure of auditor tenure is important and in the
public interest, and that it is appropriate to require disclosure in the auditor's reportbecause it is the primary means by which auditors communicate with investors. This will
ensure that the disclosure is in a readily accessible and consistent location—the
auditor's report—for all companies. It will make auditor tenure information immediately
available to investors upon filing with the SEC of a document containing the auditor'sreport. Disclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report will also reduce search costs
for investors who are interested in auditor tenure, relative to the current environment ofvoluntary reporting. Disclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report may also be more
likely to encourage further discussion of auditor tenure by management and the audit
committee and potential disclosure in company filings.
The Board is not persuaded by commenters' concerns that disclosure of auditor
tenure in the auditor's report necessarily suggests a specific correlation between auditor
tenure and audit quality, or between auditor tenure and auditor independence. In the
Board's view, auditor tenure is another data point about the auditor, in addition to thefirm name and the office issuing the auditor's report, for which there is demonstrable
investor demand.
The standard does not specify a required location within the auditor's report forthe statement on auditor tenure; auditors that are concerned about the inferences
readers may draw based on the placement of the disclosure in the auditor's report havediscretion to present auditor tenure in the part of the auditor's report they consider
appropriate. Consistent with the reproposal, the illustrative auditor's report in the final
standard includes the statement on auditor tenure at the end of the report.
The Board considered disclosure of auditor tenure in Form AP, which requires
disclosure of the name of the engagement partner and of the names and percentage ofparticipation of other accounting firms in the audit for all issuer audits. Form AP wasdeveloped primarily to respond to commenter concerns about the potential liability
consequences of naming persons in the auditor's report, the potential need to obtainconsents from those named persons in connection with registered securities offerings,
and the additional time needed to compile information about the other accounting firms.
The Board's determination to require disclosure in Form AP, rather than in the auditor'sreport, was a means to address these concerns. Disclosure of auditor tenure does nothave the same potential liability or other consequences as disclosure of the name of theengagement partner or other accounting firms, so such an approach is unnecessary inthis case.
The Board acknowledges that the SEC, given its broader authority andresponsibility for the financial reporting process, could in the future determine that
auditor tenure should be disclosed by some other party or in some other location, in
addition to or instead of in the auditor's report. Accordingly, the Board is adopting its
requirement for tenure disclosure in the auditor's report today. The Board anticipates

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 48

that, if the SEC undertook rulemaking for disclosure of auditor tenure, the Board would
work with the SEC to ensure that PCAOB standards coordinate appropriately with any
new SEC requirements.81b.

Determination of Tenure

The reproposal contemplated that tenure would be calculated taking into accountfirm or company mergers, acquisitions, or changes in ownership structure, and it
included a note providing that if the auditor is uncertain as to the year the auditor
became the company's auditor, the auditor should so state and provide the earliest yearof which the auditor has knowledge. Some commenters objected to this approach,saying that it could confuse investors and its relevance is unclear. The Board believes
that the disclosure of tenure should reflect the entire relationship between the company
and the auditor, including the tenure of predecessor accounting firms and engagement
by predecessors of the company under audit. No changes have been made to the notein the final standard.
Additionally, if a company went public and maintained the same auditor, auditor
tenure will include the years the auditor served as the company's auditor both before
and after the company became subject to SEC reporting requirements.
Because of the unique structure of investment companies, which typically
includes common accounting, internal control, and oversight functions at the grouplevel, the reproposed standard required that, for an investment company that is part of agroup of investment companies,82 the auditor's statement regarding tenure will containthe year the auditor began serving consecutively as the auditor of any investmentcompany in the group of investment companies.83 For example, if Firm A has been81

Of course, the SEC also has authority to abrogate or modify PCAOB rules
at any time, to, among other things, further the purposes of the securities laws. Section
107(b)(5) of Sarbanes-Oxley, 15 U.S.C. 7217(b)(5).
82

A group of investment companies, as defined by Section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act"), means any two or
more registered investment companies that hold themselves out to investors as relatedcompanies for purposes of investment and investor services. For purposes ofdetermining auditor tenure, any tenure with other entities that may be part of aninvestment company complex, such as investment advisers or private investmentcompanies, is not included.
83

The following is an example of such statement: "We have served as theauditor of one or more [Group Name] investment companies since [year]."PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 49

auditing investment companies in XYZ group of investment companies since 1980, thecurrent auditor's report for XYZ fixed income fund, whose inception date was in 2010,
will state that Firm A has served as the auditor of one or more XYZ investmentcompanies since 1980.
A commenter asserted that measuring auditor tenure from the first year ofservice to the group of investment companies might confuse or even mislead the readerof the auditor's report for a new fund, especially if the auditor has served the group forseveral years. Another commenter supported the reproposed methodology formeasuring tenure for investment companies stating that it is appropriate given thecommon accounting system, system of internal control over financial reporting, andboard oversight for a group of investment companies.
After considering the comments received, the Board is adopting the requirement
regarding auditor tenure for an investment company that is part of a group of investmentcompanies as reproposed. The Board believes that the length of an auditor's
relationship with the group is more relevant than the relationship with an individual fund,since funds can be started and merged over time but the auditor's relationship with thegroup continues.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The EU requires a statement in the auditor's report that indicates the total
uninterrupted engagement period, including previous renewals and reappointments ofthe statutory auditors or the audit firms.84 The IAASB and the FRC do not include asimilar requirement.
2.

Clarification of Existing Auditor's Responsibilities

The reproposed standard included requirements that would enhance
standardized language of the auditor's report by clarifying the nature and scope of theauditor's existing responsibilities, such as a new statement regarding auditor
independence and the addition of the phrase "whether due to error or fraud," whendescribing the auditor's responsibility under PCAOB standards to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements. In
addition, the reproposed standard included a requirement intended to promote
uniformity with respect to the addressee of the report.

84

See requirements in 2(b) of Article 10, Audit Report, of Regulation (EU)No 537/2014.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 50a.

Auditor Independence

The reproposed standard included a required statement in the auditor's reportthat the auditor is a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and is required to
be independent with respect to the company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC85 and the PCAOB.86
Commenters generally supported the required statement regarding auditor
independence. Some said that the statement would reinforce financial statement users'
understanding of the auditor's existing obligations to be independent and serve as areminder to auditors of these obligations. Some commenters preferred a more definitive
statement, such as stating that the auditor is in fact independent and in compliance withapplicable independence rules. A few commenters questioned whether the statement
will improve an investors' understanding of the auditor's independence responsibilities,
yield any incremental benefits or insight to investors, or have any impact on auditor
behavior. Some of these commenters pointed out that independence is already includedin the title of the auditor's report and including an additional statement in the auditor'sreport is redundant and unnecessary.
After consideration of comments, the statement regarding auditor independence
is adopted as reproposed. The Board believes that the independence statement in theauditor's report will both enhance investors' and other financial statement users'
understanding of the auditor's existing obligations to be independent, and serve as areminder to auditors of these obligations. The statement regarding auditor
independence is not intended to, and will not, affect auditor independence requirements
under the securities laws, SEC rules, or PCAOB rules.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The IAASB requires that the auditor's report include a statement that the auditor
is independent of the entity in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating
to the audit and has fulfilled the auditor's other ethical responsibilities in accordance withthese requirements.87 The EU requires a statement in the auditor's report that theauditor remained independent of the audited entity in conducting the audit.88 The FRC
85

See Regulation S-X Rule 2-01, 17 CFR 210.2-01.

86

See PCAOB Rule 3520, et seq.

87

See paragraph 28(c) of ISA 700.

88

See requirements in 2(f) of Article 10, Audit Report, of Regulation (EU) No

537/2014.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 51

requires the auditor to state that the auditor is required to comply with the United
Kingdom's ethical standards for auditors, which include requirements regarding auditor
independence.89b.

Addressee

Under the existing standard, the auditor's report may be addressed to thecompany whose financial statements are being audited, its board of directors, or
stockholders.90 Under current practice, the auditor's report is generally addressed to
one or more of the following: (1) the board of directors and stockholders/shareholders,or their equivalent for issuers that are not organized as corporations; (2) the plan
administrator or plan participants for benefit plans; and (3) the directors or equity
owners for brokers or dealers.91
To promote consistency in addressing the auditor's report to the company's
investors, the reproposed standard included a requirement for the auditor's report to beaddressed to the shareholders and the board of directors, or equivalents for companies
not organized as corporations. The reproposed standard stated that the auditor's report
may include additional addressees.
Commenters generally supported the addressee requirement as reproposed
stating that it is appropriate and will create consistency in practice. A commentersuggested limiting the required addressees to the shareowners of corporations orequivalents for companies not organized as corporations because investors are the key
customers of the auditor's report. A few commenters stated that the auditor's report isintended for general use and the requirement for the auditor's report to be addressed toa specific party is not necessary. A commenter expressed concern that retaining theoption for the auditor's report to be addressed to third parties could inadvertently resultin increased auditor liability and cost.
In response to comments, and to promote greater uniformity in the addressees of
the auditor's report, the Board is adopting the addressee requirement as reproposed.
Since inclusion of additional addressees is voluntary, auditors could assess, based on
the individual circumstances, whether or not to include additional addressees in theauditor's report. In addition, the Board believes that it is appropriate for the auditor's
89

See paragraph 15 of UK ISA 700 (2013).

90

See existing AS 3101.09.

91

This information is based on a review by PCAOB staff of a random sample
of 2014 fiscal year-end auditor's reports for issuers and brokers and dealers.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 52

report to be addressed to the board of directors and not just to the shareholders,
because of the role of the board of directors in the governance of the company.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The IAASB requires that the auditor's report be addressed as appropriate, basedon the circumstances of the engagement.92 The EU does not specify the addressee ofthe auditor's report. The FRC requires that the auditor's report be addressed as requiredby the circumstances of the engagement.93 UK auditor's reports are typically addressedto either the members or the shareholders of the company.94
c.

Other Enhancements to the Basic Elements

The reproposal would have changed the language for certain elements in theexisting auditor's report. These elements included:Financial statement notes—The identification of the financial statements,
including the related notes and, if applicable, schedules, as part of thefinancial statements that were audited.95 Under the existing standard, thenotes to the financial statements and the related schedules are not
identified as part of the financial statements.



Error or fraud—A description of the auditor's responsibility to plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatements, whether caused

92

See paragraph 22 of ISA 700.

93

See paragraph 13 of UK ISA 700 (2013).

94

See paragraph A5 of UK ISA 700 (2013).

95

The final standard uses the term "financial statements" to include all notes
to the statements and all related schedules, as used under SEC rules that apply toissuers. See Regulation S-X Section 1-01(b), 17 CFR 210.1-01(b), which states in part,"the term financial statements . . . shall be deemed to include all notes to the statements
and all related schedules." The final standard will not apply to schedules included as
supplemental information, as defined in AS 2701, Auditing Supplemental Information
Accompanying Audited Financial Statements, because those schedules are notconsidered part of the financial statements. The auditor should continue to look to therequirements of AS 2701 for the auditor's reporting responsibilities regarding
supplemental information accompanying audited financial statements.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 53
by error or fraud.96 The existing standard does not require the auditor'sreport to contain the phrase whether due to error or fraud.
Nature of the audit—The description of the nature of the audit reflected theauditor's responsibilities in a risk-based audit and aligned the description
with the language in the Board's risk assessment standards, including:oPerforming procedures to assess the risks of material misstatementof the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respond to those risks;oExamining, on a test basis, appropriate evidence regarding theamounts and disclosures in the financial statements;o

Evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management; andoEvaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

Commenters generally supported the reproposed language for these basic
elements of the auditor's report. These elements are adopted as reproposed.
3.

Additional Basic Elements Suggested by Commenters

In addition to the changes proposed by the Board, commenters on the reproposal
suggested additional elements to be included in the auditor's report.
Several commenters suggested that the PCAOB consider additional
standardized language in the auditor's report to describe the responsibilities of theauditor, management, and the audit committee. In doing so, some of these commenterssuggested that the PCAOB consider additional language adopted by the IAASB, inorder to promote consistency in reporting and to help users understand more fully theseparate responsibilities of each of the parties with respect to the audited financial
statements. In contrast, another commenter cautioned that a thorough description of
everyone's roles and responsibilities would further add to repetitive boilerplate
language. This commenter suggested instead that the auditor's report provide a crossreference to a more complete description of the roles and responsibilities of the auditor,
management, and the audit committee. This commenter did not indicate where suchcross-referenced material would appear. Given little interest from investors in such
96

See paragraph .02 of AS 1001, Responsibilities and Functions of the
Independent Auditor.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 54

additional language during the Board's initial outreach and the risk that it would beboilerplate, the final standard does not include these additional elements.
Two accounting firms suggested describing the meaning of reasonableassurance. The final standard requires a statement in the "Basis for Opinion" section of
the auditor's report that the auditor "plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement."
The auditing standards describe reasonable assurance as a high level of assurance,
although not absolute assurance.97 During the Board's initial outreach such additional
language was considered, but there was no investor demand for it. As a result, the final
standard does not expand the description of reasonable assurance in the auditor'sreport.
Some commenters also suggested that the auditor's report should include
disclosure of the materiality measures used by auditors in planning the audit. These
commenters asserted that it could help inform investors' proxy voting process for auditor
ratification, as such disclosure could be a valuable supplement to an audit fee analysis
and used to compare materiality over time to trends in restatements and adjustments.
These commenters also observed that materiality disclosures are provided in theauditor's reports in the U.K. Other commenters from the Board's initial outreach statedthat disclosing materiality levels in the auditor's report could have negative implications
on audit quality by reducing the element of surprise necessary in an audit.98 One
commenter opposed a disclosure of materiality on the basis that it may encourage
disclosure of quantitative materiality levels and ignore qualitative aspects of materiality,
which cannot be described in a meaningful way in the auditor's report. The Board has
decided not to include this additional element in the auditor's report at this time because
disclosure may reduce the element of surprise in the audit and overstate the importanceof quantitative rather than qualitative factors in the auditor's overall consideration ofmateriality. However, the Board will monitor the implementation of the final standard, as
well as the developments of expanded auditor reporting in other jurisdictions, todetermine if future enhancements to the auditor's report may be warranted in this area.
Additionally, some commenters suggested that the auditor's report should define
the auditor's responsibility for other information in documents containing audited
financial statements so that financial statement users have a clear understanding. The
Board's proposal included another new auditing standard, The Auditor's Responsibilities
97

Paragraph .10 of AS 1015, Due Professional Care in the Performance of

Work.
98

See PCAOB Release No. 2011-003, Appendix C, for a detailed discussionof the staff's outreach regarding reporting materiality levels.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 55

Regarding Other Information in Certain Documents Containing Audited Financial
Statements and the Related Auditor's Report, regarding the auditor's responsibilities forother information outside the financial statements. The Board has not taken any further
action since the proposal.
A few commenters suggested including other elements, such as the date when
the auditor completed fieldwork, a statement that the auditor looked for material fraud,
disclosure when alternative dispute resolution clauses are included in engagement
letters, and disclosure of reasons for change in the engagement partner prior to
mandatory rotation. The final standard does not include these elements because theBoard believes they would not add meaningfully to the information already provided in
the final standard or the elements go beyond what was considered in this standardsetting project and, thus, the Board is not including these elements at this time.
C.

Explanatory Language and Emphasis of a Matter

1.

Explanatory Language Required by Other PCAOB Standards

The reproposed standard, similar to the existing standard,99 provided a list of
circumstances in which the auditor is required to add explanatory language to theauditor's report and included references to other PCAOB standards in which thesecircumstances and related reporting requirements are described. These circumstances
included when there is substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as agoing concern and a restatement of previously issued financial statements, among
others.
The list of circumstances from the Board's reproposal did not attract muchcomment, although one commenter affirmed support for including the list. Commenterson the Board's proposal supported providing a list in the standard of the circumstancesthat require explanatory language in the auditor's report on the basis that keeping thisinformation in a single place would facilitate consistency in execution. The final standard
includes the list of explanatory paragraphs and related references as reproposed.
The reproposed standard included a requirement for the auditor to add
explanatory language in cases where the company is required to report on ICFR but
has determined that it is not required to obtain, and did not request the auditor toperform, an audit of ICFR.100 The reproposed standard included a reference to a new99
100

See existing AS 3101.11.

This may be the case for companies that are subject to Section 404(a) of
Sarbanes-Oxley, which mandates management ICFR reporting, but not Section 404(b),which mandates auditor ICFR reporting. Section 404(a) generally applies to companies

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 56

proposed requirement in AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances, for the auditor to add such explanatory language. Some
commenters were supportive of the reproposed requirement, while one commenter did
not believe such a requirement was necessary but did not object to its inclusion.
The Board also sought comment on whether the requirement to include an
explanatory paragraph in the auditor's report when the auditor did not perform an auditof ICFR should apply not only if company's management is required to report on ICFR,
but also if management is not required to report, such as for investment companies.
Several commenters supported expanding the requirement to all instances in which theauditor is not engaged to opine on ICFR, and not limit it to only when management isrequired to report on ICFR.
In the Board's view, it is appropriate to add explanatory language to the auditor'sreport when management has a reporting responsibility on ICFR but the auditor is notengaged to opine on ICFR, in order to clarify the auditor's responsibilities in thissituation. For companies for which management is not required to report on ICFR, theBoard does not believe that the auditor should have a separate reporting responsibility.
Accordingly, the final standard retains the requirement as reproposed.101 The auditor
may, however, choose to include such a paragraph in the auditor's report voluntarily.
Interaction between critical audit matters and explanatory paragraphs. The
reproposed standard clarified that critical audit matters are not a substitute for required
explanatory paragraphs. However, there could be situations in which a matter meets thedefinition of a critical audit matter and also requires an explanatory paragraph, such as
going concern. For these situations, the reproposal contemplated that both the
explanatory paragraph and the required communication regarding the critical audit
matter would be provided. The auditor could include the communication required for a
critical audit matter in the explanatory paragraph, with a cross-reference in the critical
audit matter section to the explanatory paragraph. Alternatively, the auditor could
choose to provide both an explanatory paragraph and the critical audit matter
communication separately in the auditor's report, with a cross-reference between thetwo sections.102 While the information reported in a critical audit matter may overlap withthat are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, other than registeredinvestment companies. Certain categories of companies that are subject to Section
404(a), such as nonaccelerated filers and emerging growth companies, are not subject
to Section 404(b).
101
102

See amendments to AS 3105.59–.60.

When both an explanatory paragraph and a critical audit matter
communication are provided, the critical audit matter description should not include

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 57

some of the information already provided in the explanatory paragraph, the critical audit
matter would provide incremental information, such as how the matter was addressed in
the audit.
Commenters were generally supportive of the interaction between thecommunication of critical audit matters and required explanatory paragraphs as
described in the reproposed standard. Some alternative views, however, wereexpressed. One commenter thought that if a required explanatory paragraph is also a
critical audit matter, disclosure in the auditor's report should be limited to one place inthe auditor' report. The commenter suggested that the communication requirements forboth a critical audit matter and an explanatory paragraph be reported in the critical audit
matter section of the auditor's report with a cross reference in the explanatory
paragraph section. Another commenter suggested that the PCAOB harmonize its
approach with that of the IAASB, which requires a reference in the key audit matter
section but waives the requirements to describe the key audit matter and how it wasaddressed during the audit. Finally, another commenter thought that critical audit matter
communications should not be permitted to be integrated with explanatory paragraphs,on the basis that explanatory paragraphs are about matters in the financial statements
to which the auditor wants to draw the reader's attention and are not necessarily critical
audit matters.
The final standard retains the interaction between critical audit matters andexplanatory paragraphs as reproposed. The approach provides flexibility on auditor
disclosure, yet also ensures that the communication requirements are met.
2.

Emphasis of a Matter

The reproposed standard, similar to the existing standard, provided the ability forthe auditor to add a paragraph to the auditor's report to emphasize a matter regarding
the financial statements ("emphasis paragraph").103 Emphasis paragraphs are notrequired, but may be used by auditors to draw the reader's attention to matters such as
significant transactions with related parties and unusually important subsequent events.
The reproposed standard provided a list of potential matters that the auditor mayemphasize in the auditor's report, although the auditor may also decide to emphasize
other matters.

conditional language that would not be permissible in the explanatory paragraph. Seefootnote 5 of AS 2415.
103

See existing AS 3101.19.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 58

Commenters were supportive of emphasis paragraphs as described in the
reproposed standard and did not suggest any additional matters to be included in thelist of potential emphasis paragraphs. The final standard includes emphasis paragraphs
as reproposed.
Interaction between critical audit matters and emphasis paragraphs. The
reproposed standard stated that emphasis paragraphs are not a substitute for required
critical audit matters. If a matter that the auditor considers emphasizing meets thedefinition of a critical audit matter, the auditor would provide the information required for
critical audit matters, and would not be expected to include an emphasis paragraph in
the auditor's report. Although this did not generate much comment, one commenter
affirmed support for the interaction between critical audit matters and emphasis
paragraphs. The final standard retains the interaction between critical audit matters andemphasis paragraphs as reproposed.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
Under the requirements of other regulators and standard setters, there are no
analogous explanatory paragraphs, except for reporting on going concern. The Board's
reproposed approach is similar to the IAASB's approach to the interaction between aparagraph regarding the company's ability to continue as a going concern and key audit
matters, although the underlying requirements for auditor reporting on going concern
vary.104 Under the IAASB's approach, an emphasis of matter paragraph is not required
for a matter that was determined to be a key audit matter.105 The EU and the FRC haveseparate requirements related to going concern reporting that do not specificallyaddress the interaction with their expanded auditor reporting.106 The IAASB, FRC, andEU do not have requirements for reporting on ICFR.
D.

Information about Certain Audit Participants

On May 9, 2016, the SEC approved new rules and related amendments to theBoard's auditing standards, including amendments to AS 3101, that will provide
104

See paragraph A1 of ISA 570, Going Concern, and paragraph 15 of ISA

701.
105

See paragraph 8 of ISA 706, Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other
Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditor's Report.
106

See ISA (UK and Ireland) 570, Going Concern, and see Article 28, Audit
Reporting, of Directive 2014/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (Apr.
16, 2014).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 59

investors and other financial statement users with information about engagement
partners and other accounting firms that participate in audits of issuers.107 Firms will be
required to file Form AP with the PCAOB for each issuer audit, disclosing thisinformation. In addition to filing Form AP, firms will also have the choice to include thisinformation in the auditor's report.108 The final standard incorporates the adopted
amendments to AS 3101 for situations in which the auditor decides to include
information about certain audit participants in the auditor's report. The final standard
requires the auditor to use an appropriate section title when providing this information in
the auditor's report, but does not require a specific location in the auditor's report.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The IAASB requires the auditor to include the name of the engagement partner in
the auditor's report for audits of listed entities.109 Under EU law, the engagement partneris required to sign the audit report in all EU countries, including the United Kingdom.110
Unlike disclosure of the engagement partner's name, disclosure of other accounting
firms that participated in the audit is not required by the IAASB, FRC, or the EU.
E.

Form of the Auditor's Report

The reproposed standard required the "Opinion on the Financial Statements"
section to be the first section of the auditor's report, immediately followed by the "Basisfor Opinion" section. The reproposed standard did not specify an order for the remaining
sections of the auditor's report, which would include explanatory paragraphs and critical
audit matters. This approach allowed for consistency in the location of the opinion andbasis for opinion sections, with flexibility for the other elements of the auditor's report.
The reproposed standard also required titles for all sections of the auditor's report toprovide consistency and assist users in identifying the individual sections of the auditor'sreport.

107

See PCAOB Release No. 2015-008.

108

When the auditor divides responsibility for the audit under AS 1205, Partof the Audit Performed by Other Independent Auditors, the auditor's report mustacknowledge the involvement of the other auditor.
109
110

See paragraph 45 of ISA 700.

Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council,
Article 28, Audit Reporting (May 17, 2006).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 60

Commenters were generally supportive of the proposed changes to the form of
the auditor's report, because the changes will:Enhance the clarity and comparability of disclosures;

Make it easier for investors to find the opinion since it will be listed first;

Help facilitate a comparison between auditor's reports; andAllow for an appropriate level of flexibility and ease of use without being
overly prescriptive.

Some commenters suggested the PCAOB should be consistent with otherstandard setters in the ordering of section titles in the auditor's report. One commenter
expressed concern that the ordering of the components of the opinion and the headingof the critical audit matter section of the report may be misunderstood to imply thatcritical audit matter communications are separate and distinct from the auditor's opinion,
which could be misinterpreted as a piecemeal opinion. In light of the commenter support
described above, the Board is adopting the form of the auditor's report as reproposed.
As previously discussed, the final standard includes revised introductory language in theauditor's report to avoid the potential misperception that the communication of critical
audit matters provides piecemeal opinions.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
The reproposed approach with respect to the order of the sections of theauditor's report is generally consistent with that of the IAASB.111 The EU and FRC donot specify an order to the auditor's report.
F.

Application to Other Audits Performed Under PCAOB Standards

There are situations in which an auditor may be required by law or regulation, orvoluntarily agrees, to perform an audit engagement in accordance with PCAOB
standards for a company whose audit is not subject to PCAOB oversight.112 For
111
112

See paragraphs 23–28 of ISA 700.

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as amended by the Dodd-Frank WallStreet Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the PCAOB oversees the audits of"issuers" and brokers and dealers reporting under Exchange Act Rule 17a-5. See
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 101. An "issuer" under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is an entity
whose securities are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or that isrequired to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, or that files or has filed

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 61

example, SEC rules permit audits under PCAOB standards in connection with offerings
under Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding.113 In these situations, certain
elements of the auditor's report required under the final standard, such as the use of"registered public accounting firm" in the title or the statement regarding independence
requirements, may not apply. Additional guidance for these situations will be provided.
V.

Amendments to Other PCAOB Standards

The Board is adopting amendments to several of its existing auditing standards
solely to conform to the final standard.114 The Board is not adopting any further changes
to these existing auditing standards at this time, although the Board recognizes thatsome of the existing auditing standards, such as the redesignated standard AS 3105,
may need further updating. The Board may consider proposing further changes to thesestandards under separate standard-setting projects.
A.

AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances

Existing AS 3101.10 and .20-.76 address departures from the auditor'sunqualified opinion, such as a qualified opinion, an adverse opinion, or a disclaimer of
opinion, and other reporting circumstances, such as reporting on comparative financial
statements. These paragraphs are redesignated as AS 3105.115 Commenters who
addressed this topic generally supported the reproposed amendments to AS 3105,
including amending the example auditor's reports to conform with the example auditor'sreport in the final standard. The Board also received some comments suggesting further
changes to AS 3105, such as updating descriptions of and references to accounting
requirements that are no longer current116 and updating certain terminology (e.g.,a Securities Act registration statement that has not yet become effective and that it has
not withdrawn. See Sarbanes-Oxley Section 2(a).
113

See Securities Act Form 1-A, Part F/S (b)(2) and (c)(1)(iii); Regulation
Crowdfunding Rule 201(t) instruction 9, 17 CFR 227.201(t).
114

The amendments are included in Appendix 2.

115

AS 3101.01-.09 and .11-.19 are amended and restated as provided inAppendix 1.
116

The Board has issued guidance regarding the status of outdated
descriptions of and references to U.S. GAAP in PCAOB standards. See PCAOB, Staff
Questions and Answers, References to Authoritative Accounting Guidance in PCAOBStandards (Sept. 2, 2009). Among other things, this guidance provides that auditors

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 62changing references from "entity" to "company"). The Board may consider such updates
as part of a separate standard-setting project.
The Board is adopting final amendments to AS 3105 that are substantially similar
to the reproposal. The amendments to AS 3105 are not intended to change thecircumstances in which the auditor would depart from an unqualified opinion. Thechanges from the current standard will primarily: (1) require the communication ofcritical audit matters in certain circumstances; (2) revise certain terminology to align withthe final standard; and (3) amend the illustrative reports for the basic elements of the
final standard and the required order of certain sections of the auditor's report.
AS 3105 includes:
Communication of Critical Audit Matters in Reports Containing Other thanUnqualified Opinionsa.

Qualified opinion—Amendments to AS 3105 will require that when theauditor expresses a qualified opinion, the auditor's report also include
communication of critical audit matters, if critical audit matter requirements
apply.

b.

Adverse opinion—The existing requirements related to an adverse opinion
are not amended to require the auditor to communicate critical audit
matters. In the Board's view, the most important matter to investors andother financial statement users in such circumstances would be thereason for the adverse opinion.

c.

Disclaimer of opinion—The existing requirements related to a disclaimer ofan opinion are not amended to require the auditor to communicate critical
audit matters. In the Board's view, the most important matter to investors
and other financial statement users in such circumstances would be thereason for the disclaimer of opinion.

Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
Under the IAASB's approach, a matter giving rise to a qualified, adverse, ordisclaimer of opinion is by nature a key audit matter.117 However, in suchshould disregard descriptions of and references to accounting requirements in PCAOB
standards that are inconsistent with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification("ASC").
117

See paragraph 15 of ISA 701.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 63

circumstances: (1) the matter should not be described in the key audit matter section of
the auditor's report, (2) the auditor should report on the matter in accordance withapplicable standards, and (3) the auditor should include a reference in the key audit
matter section to the basis for modified opinion section where the matter is reported.118
The requirements to determine and communicate key audit matters, other than thematters giving rise to the modified opinion, would still apply when the auditor expresses
a qualified or adverse opinion, but not when the auditor disclaims an opinion on thefinancial statements.119 The FRC and the EU do not include specific requirements for
expanded auditor reporting when the auditor's report contains other than an unqualified
opinion.
B.

Other Amendments to PCAOB Standards

The amendments to other PCAOB standards are substantially as reproposed.
These include:

AS 1220, Engagement Quality Review—amending to require theengagement quality reviewer to evaluate the engagement team's
determination, communication, and documentation of critical audit matters;

AS 1301, Communications with Audit Committees—amending to require
the auditor to provide to and discuss with the audit committee a draft of
the auditor's report;



AS 2201, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is
Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements—amending the example
auditor's report to conform with the example auditor's report on thefinancial statements in the final standard;

AS 2820, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements—amending toinclude the existing reporting requirements and illustrative explanatory
language related to a change in accounting principle or a restatement thatis currently in AS 3105; andAS 4105, Reviews of Interim Financial Information—amending to include
the basic elements of the final standard, where applicable.

118

Id.

119

See paragraph A7 of ISA 701 and paragraph 29 of ISA 705, Modifications
to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor's Report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 64

Conforming amendments were also made to every PCAOB standard that refers
to the auditor's report. Commenters generally supported the amendments as
reproposed.
A commenter suggested revising AS 3305, Special Reports, to conform to theexample auditor's report in the final standard. Since reports pursuant to AS 3305 arerarely filed with the SEC, as noted by this commenter, the Board does not believe thesereports should be updated at this time. As described above, the Board may consider
updating this standard as part of a separate standard-setting project.
VI.

Economic Considerations

The Board is committed to analyzing the economic impacts of its standard
setting. The following discussion addresses the potential economic impacts, including
potential benefits and costs, considered by the Board. The Board has sought
information relevant to economic consequences several times over the course of therulemaking. Commenters provided views on a wide range of issues pertinent toeconomic considerations, including potential benefits and costs, but did not provide
empirical data or quantified estimates of the costs or other potential impacts of thestandard. The potential benefits and costs considered by the Board are inherently
difficult to quantify, therefore the Board's economic discussion is primarily qualitative innature.
Commenters who discussed the economic analysis in the Board's reproposal
provided a wide range of views. Some commenters pointed to academic research for
the Board to consider in support of their views. One commenter asserted that theBoard's release did not provide a true economic analysis of the pros and cons ofmandating the reporting of critical audit matters, but only referenced academic studies
on the purported benefits of such reporting. Another argued that the changes describedin the reproposal would lead to a significant increase in costs, and that no compellingcase had been made that the benefits would exceed the costs. The SEC's Investor
Advocate said that the Board's economic analysis made a compelling case as to why
the required reporting of critical audit matters would reduce informational asymmetries
and add to the total mix of information available to investors.120 The Board has
considered all comments received and has sought to develop an economic analysis that
evaluates the potential benefits and costs of the final standard, as well as facilitatescomparisons to alternative Board actions.

120

See letter from Rick A. Fleming, Investor Advocate, SEC (Aug. 15, 2016)
at 3, available on the Board's website in Docket 034.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 65

A.

Need for the Rulemaking

1.

Critical Audit Matters

Generally, investors and other financial statement users know less about acompany's financial performance than do others closer to the financial reporting
process, particularly management. This information asymmetry121 can result insituations where capital is allocated suboptimally. The system of financial reporting in
the United States, which requires periodic reporting of information, including annual
financial statements, helps address the information asymmetry between investors andmanagement. Board of directors and audit committee oversight of the financial reporting
process can further reduce this information asymmetry by enhancing the quality of theinformation disclosed to the public. As part of this system, the audit of the financial
statements also helps reduce the information asymmetry investors face by providing an
independent opinion about whether the financial statements are presented fairly in allmaterial respects.
Companies' operations continue to become more complex and global. In
addition, over the last decade, there have been changes in the financial reporting
frameworks relating to accounting estimates and an increasing use of fair value as ameasurement attribute, together with new related disclosure requirements.122 Theseestimates and fair value measurements, which are important to a financial statement
user's understanding of the company's financial position and results of operations, canbe highly subjective, require significant judgment, and can result in increased
measurement uncertainty in financial statements.123 The increased complexity offinancial reporting, including the growing use of complex accounting estimates and fairvalue measurements, may contribute to the information asymmetry between investors
and management, despite the fact that management is required to provide significant
disclosures to investors and other financial statement users. Some commenters on the
reproposal have stated that investors would find information provided by the auditor, an
independent third party, particularly relevant in this setting.

121

Economists often describe "information asymmetry" as an imbalance,
where one party has more or better information than another party.
122

See PCAOB Staff Consultation Paper, Auditing Accounting Estimates andFair Value Measurements (Aug. 19, 2014).
123

See IAASB Project Proposal, Revision of ISA 540, Auditing Accounting
Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures (Mar.
2016).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 66

As part of the audit, auditors often perform procedures involving challenging,
subjective, or complex judgments, such as evaluating calculations or models, the impactof unusual transactions, and areas of significant risk. Although the auditor is required tocommunicate with the audit committee regarding such matters, the auditor's report has
not been expanded to provide this information to investors and generally provides only astandardized pass/fail opinion. Because the auditor's report generally does not contain
audit-specific information, it provides very little of the information the auditor knows
about the company, its financial reporting, and the challenges of the audit. Given theincreased complexity of financial reporting, which requires the auditor to evaluate
complex calculations or models and make challenging or subjective judgments, thecurrent form of the auditor's report does little to address the information asymmetry
between investors and auditors.
The Board believes that expanding the auditor's report to provide information
about especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgments will help
investors and other financial statement users "consume" the information presented inmanagement's financial statements more effectively. Stated in economic terms, in the
Board's view, an expanded auditor's report will reduce the information asymmetry
between investors and auditors, which should in turn reduce the information asymmetry
between investors and management about the company's financial performance.
Reducing information asymmetry about the company's financial reporting should lead toa more efficient allocation of capital.
Some commenters supported the reporting of critical audit matters as a means of
reducing the information asymmetry between investors and auditors. Other commentersdisagreed with the Board's approach and questioned whether the Board could or shouldattempt to reduce information asymmetry by requiring expanded auditor reporting. The
Board believes that requiring expanded auditor reporting as a means of reducing theinformation asymmetry between investors and auditors is consistent with its statutory
mandate to "protect the interests of investors and further the public interest in the
preparation of informative, accurate and independent audit reports."124 Investors are theintended beneficiaries of the audit, but investors do not receive information about
specific work performed during the audit. The final standard seeks to enhance the formand content of the auditor's report to make it more relevant and informative to investors
and other financial statement users.

124

Section 101(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 67a.

Increasing the Informativeness of the Auditor's Report to Address
Information Asymmetry

The communication of critical audit matters will reduce the information
asymmetry between investors and auditors by informing investors and other financial
statement users about areas of the audit that required especially challenging,
subjective, or complex auditor judgment, including the principal considerations fordetermining the matters and how the matters were addressed in the audit. The Board
believes that auditor reporting of critical audit matters will provide investors with auditspecific information that should facilitate their analysis of the financial statements andother related disclosures. The communication of critical audit matters in the auditor'sreport should also help investors and analysts who are interested in doing so to engage
management and the audit committee with targeted questions about these issues.125
Ultimately, while not every critical audit matter will be useful for every investor, broadly,
the Board believes that having the auditor provide investors and other financial
statements users with additional information about especially challenging, subjective, orcomplex auditor judgments should help reduce the information asymmetry that exists
between investors and management by providing additional insights on the financial
statements.
The communication of critical audit matters should also assist investors inassessing the credibility of the financial statements and, in at least some instances,audit quality.126 For example, the description of how the auditor addressed the critical
audit matter will help investors understand the types of issues that the auditor grappledwith in addressing these challenging, subjective, or complex areas of the audit, whichshould allow a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the related financial
statement accounts and disclosures. Furthermore, investors have consistently statedthat having the auditor rather than the company, provide this type of information would
125

The FRC observes that, in some instances, investors have begun to use
the information provided in the expanded auditor's reports in the U.K. to engage withaudit committees. See FRC 2016 Report.
126

It is often not possible to observe the difference between financial
reporting quality and audit quality. An academic study conceptually models the paththrough which the financial reporting and audit processes result in audited financial
reporting outcomes. The authors postulate that although audit quality and pre-audit
financial reporting quality are distinct constructs, the two processes are often
inseparable in terms of observable financial reporting outcomes in archival research.
See Lisa Milici Gaynor, Andrea Seaton Kelton, Molly Mercer, and Teri Lombardi Yohn,
Understanding the Relation between Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Quality, 35
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 1, 1-22 (2016).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 68
be of added value to investment decision making.127 Commenting on the reproposal, theSEC's Investor Advocate noted that investors want to hear directly from the auditor andthat this point is confirmed by surveys of professional investors, as well as by certain
academic research.128 This commenter agreed with the premise in the reproposal that,
because the auditor is required to be independent, information provided by the auditor
may be viewed by investors as having greater credibility than information provided bymanagement alone.
Reporting of critical audit matters should provide insights that will add to the mixof information that could be used in investors' capital allocation decisions, for example,by:Highlighting the aspects of the financial statement audit that the auditor
found to be especially challenging, subjective, or complex;

Enabling comparison of these aspects of the audit across companies, forexample audits of companies within the same industry; andEnabling comparison of these aspects of the audit for the same company
over time.

Many companies commenting on the reproposal argued that the reporting of
critical audit matters would not increase the informativeness of the auditor's report. For
example, several of these commenters claimed that the reporting of critical audit
matters would simply duplicate management disclosure without adding additional
information, or that critical audit matters would not provide value-relevant information.
Other commenters asserted that the reporting of critical audit matters would result in theauditor's report becoming a lengthy list of boilerplate disclosures, which would
contribute to disclosure overload or run contrary to the SEC's disclosure effectivenessinitiative. Several commenters said that critical audit matters could confuse investors if
the information in the auditor's report was duplicative of management's disclosures but
was presented in a different manner, or if the critical audit matter presented information
without appropriate context.

127
128

See IAG 2011 survey and CFA survey and poll results.

See letter from Rick A. Fleming, Investor Advocate, SEC (Aug. 15, 2016)
at 3, available on the Board's website in Docket 034 (citing Brant E. Christensen,
Steven M. Glover, and Christopher J. Wolfe, Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the
Audit Report Change Nonprofessional Investors' Decision to Invest? 33 Auditing: A
Journal of Practice & Theory 71, 71–93 (2014)).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 69

By contrast, investor commenters overwhelmingly agreed that thecommunication of critical audit matters would make the auditor's report more
informative. One commenter said that, although critical audit matters in themselves
would not provide investors with all the information needed in the face of growing
financial complexity, critical audit matters would add to the total mix of information
available to investors, and would contribute to their ability to analyze companies, form a
multifaceted understanding of them, and make informed investment decisions. Anothercommenter noted that, in jurisdictions where the expanded auditor's report is available,
it is one of the earliest elements of the company's annual report that they read because
it typically highlights the more judgmental elements of the company's accounting, which
often provides insights that form a basis for discussions with management.
b.

Mandated Rather than Voluntary Reporting

Auditors have not developed a practice of providing information in the auditor'sreport beyond what is required, even though investors have consistently requested thatthe auditor's report become more informative. Current standards provide a framework
for auditors to provide limited additional information through emphasis paragraphs,129
but in general these only point to a disclosure in the company's financial statements
without providing any additional description of the matter and, as noted below,
emphasis paragraphs are infrequent in practice. Auditor reporting about matterssignificant to the audit is not prohibited in an emphasis paragraph, but current standards
do not encourage auditors to include such information in their report and do not provide
a framework for doing so.
There are many other potential reasons why auditors are not providing
information voluntarily in the auditor's report, whether about the financial statements or
the audit. For example, the historical model of management disclosing information andthe auditor attesting to the information may lead companies to resist voluntary additional
reporting by the auditor, either through emphasis paragraphs or with respect toinformation about the audit, which the auditor would be better positioned tocommunicate than management. Further, auditors may believe that providing additional
information could potentially expose them to liability130 or that doing so could beinterpreted as a disclaimer of opinion or a partial opinion as to the identified matters.
Finally, in general, there may be disincentives to voluntary reporting if the disclosing
party is not able to fully capture the benefits of the disclosures,131 and parties may also
129

See existing AS 3101.19.

130

Section IV.A.4 contains a discussion about potential auditor liability
concerns stemming from expanded auditor reporting.
131

Academic research finds that there are certain situations in which

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 70
exhibit a bias toward the status quo.132 All of these factors disincentivize auditors fromvoluntarily providing further information about the audit, even if investors and otherfinancial statement users would respond favorably to receiving additional information.
The Board believes that the required reporting of critical audit matters will
promote more complete and consistent disclosure of audit-specific information tofinancial statement users who may be interested in it.133 Mandatory disclosure can also
improve the allocative efficiency of capital markets by decreasing the costs associatedwith gathering information, or by providing market participants with information that
otherwise would have been difficult or impossible for them to gather.134
2.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The final standard requires auditors to disclose in the auditor's report the numberof years they have served consecutively as the auditor for the company. Although somedisclosure may be socially optimal but not privately optimal. Auditors and companies
may resist voluntary expanded auditor reporting because of concerns that certain typesof spillover effects (or externalities) may create a competitive disadvantage. For asummary of this line of research, see Luigi Zingales, The Future of Securities
Regulation, 47 Journal of Accounting Research 391, 394-395 (2009). Professor
Zingales is the founding director of the PCAOB's Center for Economic Analysis, now
known as the Office of Economic and Risk Analysis. The research cited above waspublished before he joined the PCAOB.
132

Research in behavioral economics suggests that when facing a set ofdecisions, individuals are more likely to stick to the known outcome (status quo) thanwould be expected based on the theory of rational decision making under uncertainty.
There are a variety of reasons why individuals may choose the status quo outcome inlieu of an unknown outcome, including aversion to the uncertainty inherent in movingfrom the status quo to another option. See William Samuelson and Richard Zeckhauser,
Status Quo Bias in Decision Making, 1 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7, 7-59 (1988).
133

Academic research on disclosure explores these types of positive
externalities, as well as certain negative externalities. See, e.g., Ronald A. Dye,
Mandatory versus Voluntary Disclosures: The Cases of Financial and Real Externalities,
65 The Accounting Review 1, 1-24 (1990); or Anat R. Admati and Paul Pfleiderer,
Forcing Firms to Talk: Financial Disclosure Regulation and Externalities, 13 The Review
of Financial Studies 479, 479-519 (2000).
134

See, e.g., John C. Coffee, Jr., Market Failure and the Economic Case fora Mandatory Disclosure System, 70 Virginia Law Review 717, 717–753 (1984).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 71

commenters dispute the value of this information, investor commenters have indicatedthat the length of the relationship between the auditor and the company would be auseful data point. The growing trend toward voluntary disclosure of this information bycompanies suggests that increasing numbers of companies believe that the market
finds the disclosure useful.135 Further, there is a line of academic research suggestingthat there is an association between auditor tenure and increases or decreases in audit
quality.136
Although investors may be able to determine auditor tenure by, for example,
reviewing past auditor's reports, for many companies the information is not readily
available even through a manual search process.137 Furthermore, while somecompanies voluntarily provide information about auditor tenure in the proxy statement,
many do not. Many companies are also not subject to the proxy rules (for example,
most investment companies, foreign private issuers, and many companies whose
securities are not listed on a national securities exchange). In cases where theinformation is provided voluntarily, it is not provided in a consistent location. The Board
believes that these issues create unnecessary search costs for investors who wish toevaluate information about auditor tenure. Mandatory disclosure of auditor tenure in theauditor's report will provide a consistent location for this information and will reducesearch costs relative to the current baseline for investors who are interested in auditor
tenure, especially in the case of companies that do not voluntarily provide suchinformation or for which the information is not available through the EDGAR system.
Mandatory disclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report may also be more likely to
encourage further discussion of auditor tenure by management and the audit committee
and potential disclosure in company filings.
The existing auditor's report also does not describe important aspects of theauditor's responsibilities under existing auditing standards, such as the auditor's
responsibility to detect material misstatements, whether due to error or fraud; theauditor's responsibility for the notes to the financial statements; and the auditor
independence requirement. This may contribute to misperceptions by investors andother financial statement users about the auditor's role and responsibilities, including
with respect to these matters. Academic research suggests that there are a number of135

See Center for Audit Quality and Audit Analytics, 2016 Audit Committee
Transparency Barometer (Nov. 2016). See also Ernst & Young, Audit Committee
Reporting to Shareholders 2016 (Sept. 2016).
136

See Section VI.D.2.f for a discussion of academic research regarding
auditor tenure.
137

Supra note 76.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 72

ways in which investor perceptions of the role and responsibilities of the auditor may
diverge from what current professional standards require.138 In addition, the existing
standards do not require a uniform approach to basic content, such as the addressee ofthe report and the form of the auditor's report, which may increase the time and costs ofprocessing the information in the auditor's report. The final standard contains provisions
requiring the basic elements in the auditor's report to be presented more uniformly.
Commenters generally supported the reproposed changes to these basic
elements of the auditor's report. Some commenters noted that the enhanced
descriptions of the auditor's responsibility to detect material misstatements would clarify
the auditor's responsibilities for financial statement users, other commenters offeredsuggestions for refinement, such as aligning the requirements to the IAASB model oramending the description to more clearly define the auditor's role within the context ofthe financial reporting regulatory framework.
Commenters also generally supported including a statement on the auditor's
independence requirement. For example, some commenters stated that adding astatement by the auditor on their independence would reinforce investors'
understanding of the auditor's requirement to remain independent and objective in
expressing the audit opinion. Other commenters said that the enhanced description of
the independence requirement could provide a meaningful reminder of the importanceof auditor independence. However, other commenters said that the enhanced
description of auditor independence was either unnecessary, or would not have asignificant impact on auditor behavior. Based on broad commenter support, the Board isadopting these additional improvements to the auditor's report as reproposed.
B.

Baseline

1.

Critical Audit Matters

The auditor's report in the United States today generally consists of threeparagraphs that include limited audit-specific information. The existing auditor's report
138

See, e.g., Bryan K. Church, Shawn M. Davis, and Susan A. McCracken,
The Auditor's Reporting Model: A Literature Overview and Research Synthesis, 22
Accounting Horizons 69, 69-90 (2008); Glen L. Gray, Jerry L. Turner, Paul J. Coram,
and Theodore J. Mock, Perceptions and Misperceptions Regarding the Unqualified
Auditor's Report by Financial Statement Preparers, Users, and Auditors, 25 Accounting
Horizons 659, 675-676 (2011); or Theodore J. Mock, Jean Bédard, Paul J. Coram,
Shawn M. Davis, Reza Espahbodi, and Rick C. Warne, The Audit Reporting Model:
Current Research Synthesis and Implications, 32 Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory 323, 323-351 (2013).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 73

identifies the company's financial statements that were audited, provides a standardized
description about the nature of an audit, and provides an opinion on whether thecompany's financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, inconformity with the applicable financial reporting framework. The auditor's report is often
described as a pass/fail model because the report only conveys the auditor's opinion onwhether the financial statements are fairly presented (pass) or not (fail) and typicallyprovides limited information about the nature of the work on which the opinion is based.
The Board's current standards also require that the auditor add explanatory
paragraphs to the auditor's report under specific circumstances, such as when there issubstantial doubt about the company's ability to continue as a going concern or a
restatement of previously issued financial statements. When included, these paragraphs
generally consist of standardized language that provides limited audit-specificinformation.
The auditor may also, at his or her discretion, include emphasis paragraphs in
the auditor's report to emphasize a matter regarding the financial statements. Generally,an emphasis paragraph only points to a disclosure in the company's financial
statements without providing any additional description. Under current practice,emphasis paragraphs are infrequent.139 Auditors may also, at their discretion, include
language in the auditor's report indicating that they were not engaged to examine
management's assertion about the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting.140
Academic research confirms the view of the Board and many commenters thatthe current form of the auditor's report conveys little of the audit-specific information
obtained and evaluated by the auditor.141 Academic research also finds that investors
and other financial statement users refer to the existing auditor's report only todetermine whether the opinion is unqualified because it does not provide muchadditional informational value about a particular audit.142 These findings align with the139

In the audit reports of approximately 6,350 issuers with fiscal year 2014
filings, PCAOB staff identified audit reports containing explanatory paragraphs toemphasize matters in the financial statements in approximately 2 percent of the filings.
140

See paragraph .10 of AI 20, Other Information in Documents Containing
Audited Financial Statements: Auditing Interpretations of AS 2710.
141

See Church et al., The Auditor's Reporting Model: A Literature Overview
and Research Synthesis 69-90.
142

See Gray et al., Perceptions and Misperceptions Regarding thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 74

consistent call from investors, over the course of the Board's rulemaking process, for amore informative auditor's report.143
2.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The existing auditor's report is not required to have a specified addressee but it
may be addressed to the company whose financial statements are being audited, itsboard of directors, or stockholders.144 Under current practice, the auditor's report isgenerally addressed to one or more of the following: (1) the board of directors andstockholders/shareholders, or their equivalent for issuers that are not organized ascorporations; (2) the plan administrator or plan participants for benefit plans; and (3) the
directors or equity owners for brokers or dealers.145
The current auditor's report also includes the report title, the date, and the nameand location of the accounting firm's office issuing the report. The auditor is not currently
required to disclose in the auditor's report the number of years it has served as auditor
for the company. However, as noted earlier, many larger companies have begun
voluntarily disclosing auditor tenure in the proxy statement.
Currently, the title of the auditor's report, "Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm," provides the only indication of the auditor's independence.
Unqualified Auditor's Report by Financial Statement Preparers, Users, and Auditors
659–684; Mock et al., The Audit Reporting Model: Current Research Synthesis and
Implications 323–351.
143

Academic research has found that, in some instances, the inclusion of
explanatory language in the auditor's report may provide investors with additional valuerelevant information. A recent academic study suggests that auditor's reports containing
certain types of explanatory paragraphs required under existing standards may provide
information about the likelihood that financial statements will be subsequently restated.
The authors argue that the inclusion of such an explanatory paragraph in the auditor'sreport can provide a signal to investors about the risk of misstatement of the company's
financial statements. See Keith Czerney, Jaime J. Schmidt, and Anne M. Thompson,
Does Auditor Explanatory Language in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased
Financial Misstatement Risk? 89 The Accounting Review 2115, 2115–2149 (2014).
144
145

See existing AS 3101.09.

This information is based on a review by PCAOB staff of a random sample
of 2014 fiscal year-end auditor's reports for issuers, benefit plans, and brokers anddealers.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 75

C.

Benefits

1.

Critical Audit Matters

Economic theory commonly attributes two benefits to mandatory disclosure. First,
the disclosure of previously unknown, value-relevant information directly benefits themarket because it allows market participants to make better-informed decisions.
Second, the disclosure of such information may indirectly benefit the market becausesome parties may change their behavior in positive ways after information is disclosed.
a.

Direct Benefit: More Informative and Useful Auditor's Report

The Board believes that auditor communication of critical audit matters will
reduce the information asymmetry between investors and auditors, which should in turn
reduce the information asymmetry between investors and management about thecompany's financial performance. Some commenters on the reproposal agreed that the
information provided in critical audit matters would be used by various types of investors
in a number of different ways that are consistent with the framework outlined in the
reproposal:
Informing—Identification of the matters arising from the audit that theauditor considered especially challenging, subjective, or complex, together
with a description of how the auditor addressed those matters, whichshould provide valuable information. For example, some commenters saidthat:oCritical audit matters would add to the total mix of information
available to investors, and would contribute to their ability toanalyze companies and make investment decisions;oInvestors would use critical audit matters in the same way that they
use any other financial disclosure; critical audit matters would add
an additional perspective to management's disclosures;oInsights on critical audit matters may be relevant in analyzing andpricing risks in capital valuation and allocation;oCritical audit matters would inform investor models of company
financial performance;oCritical audit matters would augment and add more dimension to
the information provided by the financial statements and the criticalaccounting policies and estimates; andPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 76oThe communication of critical audit matters would lower the cost of
acquiring information for financial statement users.

Framing—Critical audit matters should provide investors with a newperspective on the financial statements and focus their attention on therelated financial statement accounts and disclosures, which should
facilitate their analysis of the financial statements, and help them assess
financial performance, for example by highlighting potentially relevant
information or by reducing the costs to process or search for the
information. For example, some commenters said that:oCritical audit matters would focus investors' attention on key
financial reporting issues and identify areas that deserve more
attention;o

In jurisdictions where expanded auditor reporting is available, it
focuses users' attention on issues that would be pertinent tounderstanding a company as a long-term investor; andoInformation in critical audit matters would contribute to investor
understanding and consumption of information in the financial
statements.

Monitoring—The ability to identify and evaluate the matters identified as
critical audit matters should also help investors and analysts engage
management with targeted questions about these issues and support
investor decisions on ratification of the auditor. For example, somecommenters said that:oCritical audit matters would facilitate the ability of investors tomonitor management's and the board of director's stewardship ofthe company by highlighting accounting and auditing issues andother matters that investors may wish to emphasize in their
engagement with management; andoCritical audit matters would provide important information on how
the auditor has addressed an issue, which investors can use inevaluating the rigor of the audit and making proxy voting decisions,
including ratification of the audit committee's choice of external
auditor.

Critical audit matters may be used by different types of investors in different
ways. For example, retail investors (or others who may act on their behalf, such as
analysts, credit rating agencies, or the financial press) may use the additional

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 77

information to help them identify and analyze important aspects of the financial
statements. Larger investors, on the other hand, may also use critical audit matters as abasis for engagement with management.
The communication of critical audit matters aims to provide investors andfinancial statement users with specific information about the audit of a company's
financial statements. Some commenters were concerned, however, that thecommunication of critical audit matters could lead to a reduction in comparability ofauditor's reports. Although differences in critical audit matters from period to period andacross companies may make auditor's reports less uniform, to the extent the information
provided is useful in evaluating the financial performance, highlighting these differences
should contribute to the overall mix of information. Further, some commenters on the
proposal said that investors are interested in information that is specific to the audit of acompany's financial statements, and therefore, would expect differences in auditor'sreports across companies and reporting periods. Investors also have indicated that they
are accustomed to analyzing company-specific information, such as information in
financial statements or MD&A that is specific to a company or a reporting period.
A body of academic research regarding the possible effects of expanded auditor
reporting is emerging.146 The Board has been monitoring this research with a view
towards assessing its potential relevance to this rulemaking. The Board is mindful ofseveral issues that limit the extent to which this research can inform its decision making.
Much of this research is unpublished and at a relatively early stage. The current
conclusions may be subject to multiple interpretations and it is possible that results fromthis research may be revised during the peer review process. Moreover, it may bedifficult to generalize results outside the context of specific studies. For example, inconsidering the implications of academic studies based on data from other jurisdictions,differences between the Board's final standard and the requirements in otherjurisdictions must be taken into account. In addition, specific characteristics of the U.S.issuer audit market may make it difficult to generalize observations made in othermarkets because of differences in baseline conditions (for example, market efficiency,
affected parties, policy choices, legal environment, and regulatory oversight). As toexperimental research in particular, it should be noted that the experimental setting may
not provide study participants with information that is representative of the information
environment in which market participants actually operate; for instance, if new
information appeared more salient to study participants than it would to a market
participant, the impact of expanded auditor reporting would be overstated in an
146

For a review of relevant academic research, see Jean Bédard, Paul
Coram, Reza Espahbodi, and Theodore J. Mock, Does Recent Academic Research
Support Changes to Audit Reporting Standards? 30 Accounting Horizons 255, 255-275(2016).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 78experimental setting. In addition, some of these studies were conducted based onearlier versions of rule text that differs from the final standard, which may affect theextent to which the results can inform the Board in evaluating potential effects of the
final standard.
As discussed in more detail in the economic analysis contained in the reproposal,
the results from early research analyzing the informational value of expanded auditor
reporting are inconclusive.147 Some studies found that expanded auditor reporting could
provide investors with new and useful information, while other studies found that thebenefits attributable to expanded auditor reporting were not statistically significant, butthat it could produce unintended consequences. These limited findings may be due tothe fact that the results of the studies represent averages for large samples ofcompanies. On average, investors may already have access to a variety of information
sources (such as annual reports, news media, and analyst research reports) which may
contain similar information about a company. However, expanded auditor reporting may
be relatively more informative for companies where alternative sources of information
are less available (e.g., those companies with less analyst coverage).
In response to the reproposal, two commenters submitted studies suggestingthat expanded auditor reporting has increased the informative value of the auditor'sreport. One experimental study tested the communicative value of expanded auditor
reporting by analyzing how key audit matters affected investment professionals'
assessment of a company's business economics, as well as their confidence in making
that assessment.148 The authors found that specific informational content of the key
audit matter affected the study participants' perceived level of trust associated with theauditor's report, which then affected the perceived level of trust associated with thefinancial statements and their assessment of the company's business economics.
Another study analyzed whether the communicative value of auditor's reports changed
following the implementation of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom.149
The author found that the readability of auditor's reports increased in the postimplementation period, and that the use of negative and uncertain words in expanded147

See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Section VI.C.1.a.

148

See Annette Koehler, Nicole Ratzinger-Sakel, and Jochen Theis, Does theReporting of Key Audit Matters Affect the Auditor's Report's Communicative Value?
Experimental Evidence from Investment Professionals (working paper submitted ascomment letter No. 18, available on the Board's website in Docket 034).
149

See Kecia Williams Smith, Tell Me More: A Content Analysis of Expanded
Auditor Reporting in the United Kingdom (working paper submitted as comment letter
No. 71, available on the Board's website in Docket 034).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 79
auditor's reports captured more client-specific audit risk.150 In addition, the author foundlimited evidence that the dispersion of analysts' EPS forecasts decreased following theimplementation of expanded auditor reporting, suggesting an improved information
environment. The author argued that expanded auditor reporting was successful atincreasing the communicative value of the auditor's report, and that analyst behavior
changed accordingly. In contrast, another recent experimental study found that
including critical audit matters reduced the readability of the auditor’s report but did notincrementally inform nonprofessional investors’ valuation judgments. However, thestudy suggested that the reporting of a critical audit matter lowers nonprofessional
investors' perceptions of management's credibility when earnings just meet analysts'
expectations. The study was designed and implemented using the definition of critical
audit matters and related reporting requirements from the Board’s proposal, which differ
from the final standard.151
In addition, in reviewing the experience of expanded auditor reporting in the
United Kingdom, the FRC observed that investors greatly value the information provided
in expanded auditor reporting.152 This view is confirmed by UK investors thatcommented on the reproposal. The FRC noted that, in the two years following theimplementation of the new requirements, an association of investment managers hasrecognized in an annual awards ceremony those specific auditor's reports found to be
most clear and most innovative in providing insight into the audit of the company's
financial statements.153 In addition, the FRC notes that users of the new auditor'sreports identified certain descriptions of risks that they found to be more useful—suchas descriptions that are specific to the entity being audited. Further, the FRC report
noted that, in the second year of implementation, a much greater proportion of risks
were set out in a more meaningful and transparent way.154 As noted above, the FRC's
requirements for expanded auditor reporting are different from the final standard, and150

The author uses several measures designed to assess the readability oftexts which, the study notes, have been used in several other published academic
studies addressing the readability of financial disclosure. See id. at 5.
151

See Brian Carver and Brad Trinkle, Nonprofessional Investors’ Reactions
to the PCAOB's Proposed Changes to the Standard Audit Report (March 2017)(working paper, available in Social Science Research Network).
152

See FRC 2016 Report.

153

See FRC, March 2015—Extended Auditor's Reports, A Review ofExperience in the First Year; and FRC 2016 Report.
154

Id.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 80the baseline legal and regulatory environment is not the same as in the United States.
Nevertheless, the Board believes that there are sufficient similarities for the UK
experience to be generally informative in its decision-making.
While it is too early for the body of academic research on expanded auditor
reporting to provide a conclusive answer, investors commenting during the Board's
standard-setting process have consistently affirmed the usefulness of expanded auditor
reporting and the FRC's observations on the early experience of investors in the United
Kingdom are consistent with this view. Accordingly, the Board believes that auditor
communication of critical audit matters will add to the mix of information that investors
can use.
b.

Indirect Benefit: Improved Audit and Financial Reporting Quality

In general, information asymmetry can lead to situations in which an agent (suchas an auditor) takes actions that do not coincide with the best interests of the principal(such as an investor), if the agent's incentives are misaligned.155 This type of problem isthe result of the inability of the principal to observe or monitor the agent's behavior,
which also inhibits the principal's ability to identify and reward optimal behavior, or
punish sub-optimal behavior. Economic theory posits that the disclosure of information
can have indirect effects that lead to changes in behavior.156 In the context of expanded
auditor reporting, the additional information provided in the auditor's report could be
beneficial to investors by providing more information about the audit, which could affecttheir voting decisions. To the extent that this could influence the terms of the auditor's
engagement, academic research suggests "any additional information about the agent's
action, however imperfect, can be used to improve the welfare of both the principal andthe agent."157

155

Economists use principal-agent theory to analyze situations where one
party (the principal) hires another party (the agent) to perform certain tasks anddecision-making ability is delegated to the agent. For a general discussion of principalagent theory, see, e.g., Michael C. Jensen and William H. Meckling, Theory of the Firm:
Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3 Journal of Financial
Economics 305, 305-360 (1976), or Bengt Holmstrom, Moral Hazard and Observability,
10 The Bell Journal of Economics 74, 74-91 (1979).
156

See, e.g., George Loewenstein, Cass R. Sunstein, and Russell Golman,
Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything, 6 Annual Review of Economics 391, 391419 (2014).
157

See Holmstrom, Moral Hazard and Observability at 75.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 81

This suggests that making aspects of the audit more visible to investors throughthe communication of critical audit matters should provide some auditors, management,
and audit committees with additional incentives to change their behavior in ways that
may enhance audit quality and ultimately financial reporting quality. For instance, thecommunication of critical audit matters could lead:

Auditors to focus more closely on the matters identified as critical audit
matters;Audit committees to focus more closely on the matters identified as critical
audit matters and to engage the auditor and management about theadequacy of the related disclosures; andManagement to improve the quality of their disclosures because theyknow that investors and the auditor will be scrutinizing more closely thematters identified as critical audit matters.

The communication of critical audit matters could lead auditors to increase theirfocus on the matters identified in the auditor's report as critical audit matters. As
suggested by commenters, the communication of critical audit matters could further
incentivize auditors to demonstrate the level of professional skepticism necessary forhigh quality audits in the areas of the critical audit matters. Other commenters statedthat the reporting of critical audit matters could result in increased audit quality. For
example, auditors could feel that the potentially heightened scrutiny of the mattersidentified as critical audit matters may warrant additional effort to satisfy themselves thatthey have obtained an appropriate amount of audit evidence to support their opinion.
The communication of critical audit matters could also heighten management's
attention to the relevant areas of financial statements and related disclosures. Several
commenters stated that the reporting of critical audit matters would lead management toimprove the quality of their disclosures or adopt more widely accepted financial
reporting approaches in these areas.158

158

To substantiate this point, one commenter cited a memo prepared for theclients of an international law firm that noted management should consider revising or
supplementing their own disclosures relating to issues raised in expanded auditor'sreports to ensure that the totality of disclosures around the issue are complete andaccurate. See Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Audit Reports, PCAOB Releases Reproposalof Amendments to Its Audit Report Standard (May 25, 2016).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 82

An experimental study analyzed the joint effect of expanded auditor reporting andaudit committee oversight on management disclosure choices.159 The author found thatthe study participants, who were currently serving as public company financial
executives, chose to provide the greatest level of disclosure when they knew that theauditor's report would provide a more detailed description of the accounting estimate,
and the audit committee exhibited strong oversight. The author argued that, similar towhat other academic research has found regarding the resolution of audit adjustments,
information presented in critical audit matters would be the outcome of a negotiation
process between the auditor and management.
Increased management attention to the related aspects of the financial statement
accounts and disclosures described in the critical audit matters should, at least in somecases, lead to an incremental increase in the quality of the information presented.
Academic research has shown that increased quality of information could result in a
reduction in the average cost of capital.160
In addition, the communication of critical audit matters may enhance the audit
committee's oversight efforts by providing an additional incentive for the audit committee
to engage with the auditor and management about the matters identified as critical audit
matters and the adequacy of the company's related disclosures. Although somecommenters stated that the required communication of critical audit matters would "chill"communications between the auditor and the audit committee, others said that it would
enhance communications between these parties. Further, it should be noted that the
final standard does not change the Board's existing requirements on audit committee
communications, other than requiring the auditor to provide the audit committee with adraft of the auditor's report.
To the extent changes in the behavior of auditors, audit committees, andmanagement occur, they could lead to an incremental increase in audit quality andfinancial reporting quality, which should increase investors' confidence in the reliabilityof the financial statements. Some commenters stated that a more transparent andinformative auditor's report could heighten user confidence in the audit and the audited
159

See Stephen H. Fuller, The Effect of Auditor Reporting Choice and Audit
Committee Oversight Strength on Management Financial Disclosure Decisions (working
paper submitted as comment letter No. 49, available on the Board's website in Docket
034).
160

See, e.g., Richard A. Lambert, Christian Leuz, and Robert E. Verrecchia,
Information Asymmetry, Information Precision, and the Cost of Capital, 16 Review of
Finance 1, 1-29 (2012). Professor Leuz is an economic advisor at the PCAOB. The
research cited above was published before he joined the PCAOB.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 83

financial statements. Academic research suggests that an increase in investor
confidence should decrease the average cost of capital.161 As discussed in theeconomic analysis of the reproposal, some empirical studies conducted in otherjurisdictions provide evidence that expanded auditor reporting increased audit quality,
while other studies found that it did not have a measurable effect on audit quality.162 The
Board is not aware of any empirical studies indicating that expanded auditor reporting
had a negative effect on audit quality.
c.

Indirect Benefit: Differentiation among Auditor's Reports

If investors and other financial statement users perceive and respond todifferences in the quality and usefulness of the information communicated by auditors
regarding critical audit matters, expanded auditor reporting should serve as a potential
means of greater differentiation among accounting firms and engagement partners.163
One commenter stated that the reporting of critical audit matters would allow auditors todifferentiate themselves, and that this differentiation would provide useful information toinvestors and other financial statement users. If expanded auditor reporting allows
investors to differentiate among accounting firms and engagement partners, it should
provide a more nuanced signal of audit quality and financial reporting reliability.
The FRC report also noted that there are clear differences among accounting
firms in the approaches taken to implement the requirements.164 For example, one firm
went beyond the FRC's requirements by including audit findings for the risks of material
misstatement in the majority of its auditor's reports in the second year of
implementation, which other firms did far less frequently. The FRC's observations may
161

See Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, Trusting the Stock
Market, 63 The Journal of Finance 2557, 2557–2600 (2008). Professor Zingales is theFounding Director of the PCAOB's Center for Economic Analysis, now known as the
Office of Economic and Risk Analysis. The research cited here was published before hejoined the PCAOB.
162

See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Section VI.C.1.b, footnotes 154-156
and accompanying text.
163

On May 9, 2016, the SEC approved new rules and related amendments to
the Board's auditing standards, including amendments to AS 3101, that will provide
investors and other financial statement users with information about engagement
partners and other accounting firms that participate in audits of issuers. See PCAOB
Release No. 2015-008.
164

See FRC 2016 report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 84

suggest that accounting firms took different approaches to expanded auditor reporting
as a means of distinguishing themselves based on the quality and usefulness of theinformation provided in their auditor's reports. Furthermore, as discussed in theeconomic analysis of the reproposal, an academic study argued that investors found theauditor's reports issued by some accounting firms to be more useful than others.165 One
commenter specifically noted that mandatory auditor rotation was introduced in the UK
at the same time as expanded auditor reporting, and that this may have provided
accounting firms with motivation to differentiate themselves.
In addition to relying on the audit committee (which, at least for exchange-listedcompanies, is charged with overseeing the external auditor), in the absence ofdifferentiation based on the auditor's report, users of financial statements may rely on
proxies such as the reputation of the accounting firm issuing the auditor's report,
aggregated measures of auditor expertise (for example, dollar value of issuer market
capitalization audited or audit fees charged), or information about the geographic
location of the office where the auditor's report was signed as signals for audit quality.
Academic research finds, however, that these are imperfect signals of audit quality.166
The identification and description of critical audit matters should permit
differentiation among auditor's reports based on investor perceptions of theirinformativeness and usefulness. In some instances it may also provide a signal of audit
quality. Because the determination and communication of critical audit matters may
reflect a variety of considerations, however, critical audit matters may not bear directly
on audit quality. For example, the choice of which critical audit matters to communicate
or how to describe them may reflect considerations such as the company's businessenvironment and financial reporting choices, accounting firm methodology, engagement
partner characteristics, and legal advice. Thus, a more detailed description of critical
audit matters may not necessarily reflect a higher quality audit than a less informativedescription of such matters.
Nevertheless, informative descriptions of how the audit addressed critical audit
matters should provide insight into the extent and appropriateness of the auditor's work.
Moreover, it is possible that thoughtful, audit-specific, and useful critical audit matters(or, conversely, generic and uninformative critical audit matters) could affect investor
165

See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Section VI.C.1.b, footnote 161 andaccompanying text.
166

See, e.g., Jere R. Francis, A Framework for Understanding andResearching Audit Quality, 30 Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 125, 125–152(2011) and Mark DeFond and Jieying Zhang, A Review of Archival Auditing Research,
58 Journal of Accounting and Economics 275, 275–326 (2014).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 85

perceptions of the auditor's work and willingness to provide useful information. As aresult, the communication of critical audit matters, potentially in conjunction withdisclosures regarding the identity of the engagement partner and other accounting firmsthat participated in the audit,167 and other relevant information should enabledifferentiation among engagement partners and accounting firms on that basis.
2.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The final standard will introduce new requirements regarding auditor tenure, theaddressee of the auditor's report, and statements in the auditor's report related toauditor independence and the auditor's responsibility for reporting on ICFR.168 In
addition, the final standard contains other changes to the form of the auditor's report,
which are intended to improve and clarify the language for certain elements, such as
statements related to the auditor's responsibilities regarding the notes to the financial
statements, and to promote a consistent presentation of this information across auditor'sreports.
Investor commenters have consistently supported disclosing tenure in theauditor's report. In the Board's view, which is consistent with the views of somecommenters,169 disclosing information about auditor tenure in the auditor's report will
provide a consistent location for this information and decrease the search costs, relative
to the current environment of voluntary reporting, for some investors and other financial
statement users who are interested in this information.
The statement regarding the auditor's existing obligation to be independent of thecompany is intended to enhance investors' and other financial statement users'
understanding about the auditor's obligations related to independence and to serve as areminder to auditors of these obligations. By requiring the auditor's report to beaddressed to certain parties, the Board will be promoting uniformity in the addressees of
the auditor's report.
Commenters were generally supportive of the reproposed changes to the form of
the auditor's report. For example, some commenters stated these enhancements would
167

See PCAOB Release No. 2015-008.

168

In circumstances where management is required to report on ICFR but theauditor is not and has not performed an audit of ICFR, the final standard requires astatement to that effect in the auditor's report.
169

See also Section VI.D.2.f for a discussion of academic research regarding
auditor tenure.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 86

make the auditor's report easier to read and would facilitate comparisons between
auditor's reports for different companies by providing a consistent format.
D.

Costs and Potential Unintended Consequences

1.

Costs

Commenters on the reproposal raised concerns that the rule would impose
various types of costs, but generally did not quantify those costs. Even those that, at an
earlier stage of the rulemaking, conducted limited implementation testing of the proposal
were unable to provide a quantified cost estimate. Given lack of data, the Board isunable to quantify costs, but provides a qualitative cost analysis.
As an additional means of assessing potential cost implications of the final
standard, PCAOB staff has reviewed data from the first year of implementation of
expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom.170 As discussed below, staff
analyzed a variety of data points that may be associated with potential costs, including
audit fees, days required to issue the auditor's report, and the content of the expanded
auditor's report. It should be noted that it may be difficult to generalize observations
from the UK experience. For example, the reporting and documentation requirements
relating to expanded auditor's reports in the United Kingdom differ from those in the final
standard, the baseline legal environments are different, and the UK requirements apply
only to companies with a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange and not, forexample, to smaller companies that list on London's AIM market.
a.

Critical Audit Matters

The Board anticipates that the final requirements regarding critical audit matterswill have potential cost implications for auditors and companies, including their audit
committees. Such costs will likely relate to additional time to prepare and review
auditor's reports, including discussions with management and audit committees, as wellas legal costs for review of the information provided in the critical audit matters. In
addition, auditors may choose to perform more audit procedures related to areas
reported as critical audit matters (even though performance requirements have notchanged in those areas), with cost implications for both auditors and companies.
For auditors, costs might represent both one-time costs and recurring costs.
One-time costs could be incurred as a result of: (1) updating accounting firm audit and170

See PCAOB, White Paper on the Auditor's Reports of Certain UK
Companies that Comply with International Auditing Standard (UK and Ireland) 700("PCAOB White Paper") (May 2016), available on the Board's website in Docket 034.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 87

quality control methodologies to reflect the new reporting requirements; and (2)developing and conducting training of accounting firm personnel on the new reporting
requirements. When updating methodologies, some accounting firms will likely also
develop new quality control processes related to additional review or consultation on thedetermination, communication, and documentation of critical audit matters. One
commenter suggested that the initial implementation costs could place a significant andpossibly disproportionate burden on smaller accounting firms.
Recurring costs will primarily reflect additional effort expended in individual
audits. The final standard does not impose new performance requirements other thanthe determination, communication, and documentation of critical audit matters, which
will be based on work the auditor has already performed. However, there will be some
additional recurring costs associated with drafting descriptions of critical audit mattersand related documentation. It is likely that senior members of the engagement teams,
such as partners and senior managers, will be involved in determining the critical audit
matters and developing the language to be included in the auditor's report. In addition,
reviews by others, such as the engagement quality reviewer and national office, will also
result in recurring costs. Additional time might also be incurred by the auditor as a resultof discussions with management or the audit committee regarding critical audit matters.
Companies, including audit committees, will likely also incur both one-time andrecurring costs as a result of the final standard. One-time costs could be incurred, forexample, in educating audit committee members about the requirements of the newstandard and in developing management and audit committee processes for the review
of draft descriptions of critical audit matters and the related interaction with auditors.
Recurring costs will include the costs associated with carrying out those processes, aswell as any increase in audit fees associated with the new reporting requirements orlegal fees stemming from a review of critical audit matter communications.
If the drafting and review of critical audit matter reporting takes place towards theend of the audit, there will also be an opportunity cost associated with the time
constraints on the parties involved (including, for example, management, theengagement partner, the audit committee, and the auditor's and company's respective
legal counsel). The end of the audit is a busy period in which multiple issues may need
to be resolved before the auditor's report can be issued. At the same time, companies
and management may also be in the process of finalizing the annual report. Time spentdrafting and reviewing the communication of critical audit matters could occur at thesame time as other important work in the financial reporting and audit process, andwould likely involve senior management that command relatively high annual salaries orexperienced auditors and lawyers with relatively high hourly billing rates. In addition, thecommunication of critical audit matters could lead to changes in management's
disclosures, which may result in more effort and cost in the financial reporting process.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 88

Several commenters on the reproposal claimed that the required reporting of
critical audit matters would lead to increased audit fees, but none provided data or
estimates regarding the magnitude of the increases they expected. Commenters on the
proposal had differing views about the likely magnitude of direct costs associated withauditor reporting of critical audit matters. Some commenters said that there would not
be material additional costs for communication of critical audit matters, as these matterswould already have been communicated to the audit committee. This may suggest thata substantial amount of the work required to communicate critical audit matters would
already have been completed earlier in the audit.
One commenter argued that the changes described in the reproposal would leadto a significant increase in costs, and that no compelling case had been made that thebenefits would exceed the costs. Some commenters noted that investors would be
expected to ultimately bear the cost of the audit, and these commenters have voiced
strong support for expanded auditor reporting since the project's inception. Thissuggests that they consider the benefits of expanded auditor reporting to justify thecosts, and would support additional fees for additional useful information.
Audit fees do not fully reflect the cost of implementing expanded auditor reportingto the extent that accounting firms choose to absorb those additional costs and because
audit fees do not reflect the impact of any additional demand on management's timeassociated with expanded auditor reporting. Subject to those limitations, in its review of
the implementation of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom, the PCAOB
staff did not find evidence of statistically significant increases in audit fees following thefirst year of expanded auditor reporting.171 For 53 percent of the companies analyzed,
audit fees for the year of implementation remained the same or decreased as comparedto the prior year's audit fees. Audit fees increased for the remaining companies. The
PCAOB staff found that the average change in audit fees was an increase of
approximately 5 percent, roughly consistent with the findings of academic research
described in the economic analysis in the reproposal. However, the staff found that themedian change in audit fees was zero. Collectively, these results seem to suggest thatoutlier companies with relatively large increases in audit fees drove the result for the
average change in audit fees. It should be noted that the PCAOB staff's review did notanalyze whether other factors, such as inflation, changes in the economic environmentand corporate risk, corporate acquisitions, or the implementation of other regulatorychanges, contributed to the documented increase in audit fees.
One commenter on the reproposal noted that the caveats described above areimportant because the inability to fully gauge the costs of expanded auditor reporting
could lead the Board to underestimate the costs associated with the rule, which may
171

Id.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 89bear disproportionately on smaller companies and their auditors. Another commenter
also asserted that the costs of expanded auditor reporting are likely to bedisproportionately borne by smaller companies because the reproposed rule had, intheir estimation, limited scalability. The Board believes that the complexity and costs
associated with determining, documenting, and communicating critical audit mattersshould generally depend on the nature and complexity of the audit. This would in turndepend on the complexity of the operations and accounting and control systems of thecompany.
b.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The changes adopted to the basic elements of the auditor's report do not
represent a significant departure from the reproposal. Some of the enhanced basic
elements will have cost implications for auditors, although these costs are not expected
to be significant. One-time costs will primarily relate to updating methodology andtraining and the initial determination of the first year the auditor began serving
consecutively as the company's auditor. Based on comments received, it does notappear that the changes adopted to the basic elements will impose significant recurringcosts, because the year in which tenure began will not change and the otheramendments involve standardized language that, once implemented, will be the sameor very similar across different auditor's reports every year.
2.

Potential Unintended Consequencesa.

Time Needed to Issue the Auditor's Report

As a result of the additional effort required to determine, communicate, anddocument critical audit matters, some commenters said that it would take auditors
longer to issue their reports. On this point, the PCAOB staff study did not find evidence
that compliance with the United Kingdom's expanded auditor reporting requirements
delayed the issuance of auditor's reports in the first year of implementation. Based on
the study, for companies that had three years of financial statements, a new form
auditor's report was issued, on average, in 63 days from the company's fiscal year end
date in the year of implementation, as compared to 64 days in the prior year and 65
days two years earlier. Further, academic research cited in the economic analysis of the
reproposal similarly did not find that the UK reporting requirements led to delays infinancial reporting.172

172

See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, section VI.D.2.a, footnote 169 andaccompanying text.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 90b.

Number and Content of Critical Audit Matters

Some commenters indicated an expectation that the auditor's report would
include a long list of critical audit matters or that auditors would have incentives tocommunicate an overly long list of critical audit matters. For example, somecommenters said that this would occur because the auditor would be motivated tocommunicate as much as possible in an effort to mitigate any future liability forunidentified critical audit matters, or as a means to avoid potential consequences ofbeing second-guessed by regulators or others. Other commenters asserted that such adevelopment could make the auditor's report overly long, contributing to disclosure
overload and conflicting with the SEC's disclosure effectiveness project. Other
commenters indicated that expanded auditor reporting could lead to boilerplate
language that would diminish the expected value of the critical audit matters andobscure the clarity of the auditor's opinion. If auditors fail to provide audit-specificinformation, the communication of critical audit matters will not decrease information
asymmetry about the audit, and may obscure other important information included in theauditor's report and the audited financial statements.
The final requirements aim to provide investors with the auditor's uniqueperspective on the areas of the audit that involved the auditor's especially challenging,
subjective, or complex judgments. Limiting critical audit matters to these areas should
mitigate the extent to which expanded auditor reporting could become standardized.
Focusing on auditor judgment should limit the extent to which expanded auditor
reporting could become duplicative of management's reporting. Also, while somecommenters argued that liability concerns would increase the number of critical audit
matters auditors communicate, others suggested that liability concerns would minimize
the additional statements auditors make.
The PCAOB staff study did not find evidence that expanded auditor reporting in
the United Kingdom resulted in a very large number of risk topics or none at all in thefirst year of implementation.173 On average, the auditor's reports in the first year of
implementation included descriptions of four risk topics, with total risk topics ranging
from one to eight. Additionally, the descriptions of the risks of material misstatement in
the auditor's reports in the first year of implementation were not presented instandardized language, but included variations in content length, description, andpresentation. The most frequently described risk topics related to revenue recognition,
tax, and goodwill and intangible assets. The FRC report on the first two years of
expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom finds a similar range and average
number of risk topics disclosed in both the first and second year of implementation.174
173

See PCAOB White Paper.

174

See FRC 2016 Report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 91

The FRC report also finds disclosure of similar risk topics in the second year of
implementation of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom.175
Further, the FRC found that, in the second year of expanded auditor reporting in
the United Kingdom, the discussion of risks has improved relative to the first year of
implementation and that the majority of auditor's reports provided discussion of risks
that were more tailored to the company under audit, thus avoiding generic orstandardized wording.176 These findings suggest that, thus far, expanded auditor
reporting has not become standardized in the United Kingdom.177c.

Effects of Increased Attention to Critical Audit Matters

The communication of critical audit matters could lead auditors, company
management, and the audit committee to spend additional time and resources onreviewing the adequacy of the work performed on the related financial statement
accounts and disclosures. While this could lead to an incremental improvement in audit
and financial reporting quality for the identified critical audit matters, it is also possiblethat there may be increased costs for auditors as a result of the requirements. For
example, even though the final standard does not mandate the performance ofadditional audit procedures other than with respect to communication of critical audit
matters, it is possible that some auditors may perform additional procedures. If that
occurs, the associated costs may be passed on—in whole, in part, or not at all—tocompanies and their investors in the form of higher audit fees. Further, increased
procedures may also require additional time from the company's management to deal
with such procedures. Some commenters suggested that the increased attention on
certain matters could also lead to a related decrease in audit and financial reporting
quality if other material aspects of the financial statements and disclosures receive lessattention.
Some commenters argued that including critical audit matters in the auditor'sreport would impair the relationship between auditors and management or auditors andthe audit committee. Other commenters suggested that the required reporting of critical
audit matters would inhibit communication among the auditor, management, and theaudit committee because of concerns about what would be publicly communicated in
175

Id.

176

Id.

177

The Board finds the UK experience instructive, although it is, of course,
possible that differences between the UK and US litigation and regulatory environments
may influence the extent to which these findings would generalize to the US market.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 92

the auditor's report. One commenter also suggested that auditors may include additional
matters in audit committee communications out of concern that an omission could leadto regulatory sanctions or liability. Other commenters have said that it would enhancecommunication among the participants in the financial reporting process.
An experimental study analyzed how the strength of audit committee oversight of
the financial reporting process varied with the presence of sophisticated investors andknowledge of forthcoming expanded auditor reporting.178 The author found that study
participants, most of whom were experienced audit committee members, asked fewer
probing questions if they knew that the auditor would be providing a discussion of thesignificant accounting estimate in the auditor's report. The author argued that by asking
fewer probing questions audit committee members subconsciously insulated
themselves from potential challenges mounted by investors regarding theappropriateness of the company's financial reporting. The Board is not aware ofevidence this has occurred in the jurisdictions that have adopted expanded auditor
reporting. Moreover, it may be difficult in an experimental setting to recreate the actual
legal responsibility and potential liability that audit committee members face, which may
limit the extent to which the experimental results would generalize to actual behavior inreal-world settings.
Similarly, as described in the economic analysis of the reproposal and asserted
by at least one commenter, management may have an incentive to withhold informationfrom the auditor in order to prevent an issue from being described in the auditor's report.
It seems unlikely, however, that management would or could withhold information fromthe auditor on the most critical issues in the audit because it could result in a scope
limitation. On the contrary, it may be just as likely that management would communicate
more information to the auditor as a means of demonstrating that an issue is notchallenging, subjective, or complex, and, therefore, would not need to be described in
the auditor's report.
Under the final standard, critical audit matters are determined from the matterscommunicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee. As noted earlier,with respect to any matters already required to be communicated to the audit
committee, there should not be a chilling effect or reduced communications to the audit
committee. Therefore, it would seem that any chilling effect would relate to matters thatare not explicitly required to be communicated to the audit committee, although, as
178

Yoon Ju Kang, Are Audit Committees More Challenging Given a
Sophisticated Investor Base? Does the Answer Change Given Anticipation of Additional
Mandatory Audit Report Disclosure? (working paper submitted as comment letter No.
17, available on the Board's website in Docket 034).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 93previously described, given the breadth of current communication requirements, theBoard believes there will likely be few communications affected by that possibility.
d.

Potential Impact on Management Disclosure

Several commenters stated that the communication of critical audit matters would
give auditors leverage to encourage disclosure of information by management. Whilesome commenters asserted that this would be beneficial, others claimed it would be an
unintended negative consequence of requiring the communication of critical audit
matters. Several commenters characterized this as inappropriately expanding the role of
the auditor in the financial reporting process, while undermining the role of management
and the audit committee. In their view, this would be especially problematic if the final
standard permitted the auditor to communicate information that was not otherwise
required to be disclosed (for example, because it did not meet a specified threshold fordisclosure, such as a significant deficiency in internal control over financial reporting).
Commenters claimed that auditor communication of this "original information" would
cause a number of unintended consequences, including significant costs, disclosure ofconfidential or competitively sensitive information, and potentially misleading or
incomplete information.179
Investors and other commenters pointed out that, although expanded auditor
reporting would give the auditor additional leverage over management's disclosure
choices, this could result in improvements in the usability of financial statements andincreases in financial reporting quality. One of these commenters cited academic
research noting that, in current practice, disclosure is already guided by an iterative
process between management and the auditor. This commenter reasoned thatconcerns regarding "original information" were misplaced because the iterative process
would reduce the likelihood that the auditor would be a source of original information
since critical audit matters would likely overlap with increased management disclosure.
Another commenter pointed out that auditors would not have incentives tointerpret the Board's rule to require disclosure of original information in most situations.
For example, concerns about the limitations of their knowledge and expertise, potential
liability implications, and friction in the relationship with the company are likely to
discourage auditors from going beyond management disclosures. Nevertheless, thefinal standard contemplates that the auditor will do so only when it is necessary todescribe the principal considerations that led the auditor to determine that a matter was
especially challenging, subjective, or complex and how the matter was addressed in theaudit. The Board believes that this provision is needed in order to ensure that the fact

179

For a complete discussion of these concerns, see Section IV.A.2.c.i.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 94

that management did not provide a disclosure would not prevent the auditor from
communicating a critical audit matter.
Although the communication of critical audit matters may lead to changes in the
incentives for the auditor, company management, and the audit committee tocommunicate with each other, initial anecdotal evidence from the Board's outreachactivities suggests that the implementation of expanded auditor reporting in the United
Kingdom has not chilled such communications.
e.

Changes in Perceived Assurance on the Auditor's Report, Including
Perceptions of Auditor Liability

The communication of critical audit matters could have liability implications forauditors. For a more detailed discussion of liability, see Section IV.A.4. In addition,
because the communication of critical audit matters requires auditors to discuss aspectsof the audit that they found to be especially challenging, subjective, or complex, it ispossible that some investors and financial statement users may misconstrue thecommunications to mean that auditors were unable to obtain reasonable assurance
about the matters identified as critical audit matters. Some commenters have said thatthe communication of critical audit matters could lead to changes in the way investors
and financial statements users perceive the level of assurance provided by the auditor
on matters identified as critical audit matters, including that it could undermine the basic
pass/fail opinion. This could lead investors to erroneously conclude that there is aproblem with the audit either in the areas identified in critical audit matters or otherareas, or that auditors are providing separate assurance about the presentation of thefinancial statements, which may have implications for perceptions of auditor
responsibility in the event of an audit failure.
As discussed in the economic analysis of the reproposal, several academic
papers analyze certain risks associated with communicating critical audit matters,
including perception of auditor responsibility.180 If the communication of critical audit
matters were to lead to a reduction in perceived auditor responsibility, as is suggested
by some academic research, and this in turn reduced auditor liability, it is possible that
auditors may feel that less audit work is needed on the matters identified as critical audit
matters, which could adversely affect audit quality (although the Board's other auditing
standards, reinforced through firm quality control and Board inspections andenforcement activity, should provide a disincentive for auditors to decrease the amountor quality of audit work performed). It is difficult to draw generalizable conclusions basedon the findings of these studies. In part, this is because their results vary and are180

See PCAOB Release No. 2016-003, Section VI.D.2.d, footnotes 182-186
and accompanying text.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 95

sometimes contradictory, with some studies finding that expanded auditor reporting
increases perceived auditor responsibility and others finding that it decreases perceived
auditor responsibility. This may suggest that the results are sensitive to theexperimental design and the context in which information is presented to study
participants. In addition, it is not clear how the findings would correlate with changes inauditor behavior, because perceptions of auditor responsibility may be a poor proxy for
actual auditor responsibility or liability.
To address the risk that the communication of critical audit matters could result in
the perception of separate assurance, the final standard requires the following
statement in the auditor's report:
The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way [theauditor's] opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and [theauditor is not] by communicating the critical audit matters… providing
separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts ordisclosures to which they relate.
The purpose of this statement is to make clear that the communication of critical audit
matters in an auditor's report should not be interpreted as altering the level of assurance
on any aspect of the audit report, including the identified critical audit matters. In thisregard, the Board also notes the view of some commenters that critical audit matters
are likely to be used by institutional investors that are unlikely to misinterpret the
information.
f.

Auditor Tenure

Many commenters stated that information regarding the auditor's tenure includedin the auditor's report could result in inappropriate and inconsistent assumptions about
correlations between auditor tenure and/or independence and audit quality. Academic
research on the relationship of tenure to audit quality has varied conclusions. For
instance, some academic research indicates that engagements with short-term tenure
are relatively riskier or that audit quality is improved when auditors have time to gain
expertise in the company under audit and in the related industry.181 Other academic
research suggests that, at least prior to 2001, both short tenure (less than five years)
and long tenure (greater than fifteen years) can have detrimental effects on audit
181

See, e.g., Joseph V. Carcello and Albert L. Nagy, Audit Firm Tenure andFraudulent Financial Reporting, 23 Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 55, 55–69(2004) and Timothy B. Bell, Monika Causholli, and W. Robert Knechel, Audit Firm
Tenure, Non–Audit Services, and Internal Assessments of Audit Quality, 53 Journal of
Accounting Research 461, 461–509 (2015).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 96
quality.182 Still other academic research indicates that investors are more likely to voteagainst, or abstain from, auditor ratification as auditor tenure increases, which may
suggest that investors view long-term auditor-company relationships as adversely
affecting audit quality.183
The disclosure of auditor tenure is intended to add to the mix of information thatinvestors can use. However, commenters other than investors did not support
disclosure of auditor tenure in the auditor's report on the basis that such disclosure
would not provide value to investors or could result in false conclusions about
correlations between auditor tenure and audit quality or between auditor tenure andauditor independence. Many of these commenters recommended that, if the Board
determined to require disclosure of auditor tenure, it should be disclosed in Form AP
rather than in the auditor's report as a means of avoiding these inferences.
E.

Alternatives Considered, Including Policy Choices under the Final Standard

After considering the comments received, the Board is adopting a new auditor
reporting standard, AS 3101 and related amendments to its standards. The final
standard retains the pass/fail model while expanding auditor reporting to include thecommunication of critical audit matters. Investor commenters have consistently asked
for additional information in the auditor's report to make it more informative about theaudit of the company's financial statements.
As described below, the Board has considered a number of alternative
approaches to achieve the potential benefits of enhanced auditor reporting.
1.

Alternatives Raised by Commentersa.

Only Cross-Reference to Management's Disclosures

Some commenters suggested that, instead of communicating critical audit
matters as reproposed, auditors should only identify the critical audit matters andprovide a cross-reference to management disclosures (i.e., not describe the principal
considerations that led the auditor to determine a matter is a critical audit matter or how
182

See, e.g., Larry R. Davis, Billy S. Soo, and Gregory M. Trompeter, Auditor
Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat Earnings Forecasts, 26 Contemporary
Accounting Research 517, 517–548 (2009).
183

See, e.g., Mai Dao, Suchismita Mishra, and K. Raghunandan, Auditor
Tenure and Shareholder Ratification of the Auditor, 22 Accounting Horizons 297, 297–314 (2008).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 97

it was addressed in the audit), or refer to or list critical accounting policies and estimatesas disclosed by management. The Board believes that communicating the principal
considerations that led the auditor to determine that a matter is a critical audit matterand how it was addressed in the audit will provide useful information beyond simply
referencing existing management disclosure, and is more responsive to investor
requests for more information from the auditor's perspective.
b.

Auditor Association with Other Company Disclosures

Other commenters suggested more specific auditor assurance on particularmanagement disclosures, such as inclusion of a statement in the auditor's report thatthe audit included evaluation of the accounting policies and significant estimates, with across-reference to management's disclosures, or a statement of auditor concurrencewith the critical accounting policies and estimates of the company. One commentersuggested that audit committees should disclose critical audit matters with acorresponding confirmation from the independent auditor.
Several commenters on the proposal also suggested that the Board should
consider auditor association with, or attestation on, portions of MD&A, specificallymanagement's critical accounting policies and estimates, as an alternative to expanded
auditor reporting. These commenters have argued that such an association could
increase the quality and reliability of the information subject to the procedures.
Some commenters on the concept release, including investors, said that they
were not supportive of separate assurance by the auditor on information outside of thefinancial statements as an alternative to expanded auditor reporting, primarily because
the related auditor reporting would have appeared in a standardized form and would notprovide audit-specific information. Requiring such reporting might necessitate action by
the SEC, as well as the PCAOB, to implement, including new SEC rules regarding
management reporting and auditor attestation. In addition to reporting requirements, the
PCAOB might have to develop new performance requirements and auditors would be
required to undertake additional audit work in order to provide attestation in these areas.
Based on concerns about the complexity of such an approach, as well as thecomments received as to its limited benefits, the Board determined not to pursue auditor
association with portions of MD&A as an alternative to expanded auditor reporting at
this time. The Board believes that this approach would fail to deliver the audit-specificinformation requested by investors, while also raising potential concerns about separate
assurance on the identified matters.
c.

No Change to Auditor Reporting Requirements

The Board considered whether changes to the existing auditor reporting
requirements were needed. Auditor reporting under the current model has been

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 98

criticized by many commenters as providing limited information. Auditors have notvoluntarily provided more information in the auditor's report in response to investors'
requests. A number of factors described above, such as potential costs anduncertainties related to voluntary auditor reporting and the potential for auditor status
quo bias, may explain why voluntary reporting would not be expected to become
prevalent. These factors suggest that voluntary reporting, with or without guidance toencourage it, could also create uncertainty about the content of auditor's reports
because auditors would be able to choose whether to provide information about theaudit, what information to provide, and the form in which to provide it. On that basis, theBoard believes that standard setting is appropriate.
d.

Consideration of Analogous Requirements of Other Regulators andStandard Setters

In developing the final standard, the Board took into account the requirements for
expanded auditor reporting of other regulators and standard setters, such as the IAASB,
the FRC, and the EU. Changes to the auditor's report that other regulators and standard
setters have adopted include some commonality, such as communicating information
about audit-specific matters in the auditor's report. Several commenters suggested thatthe Board align its requirements for expanded auditor reporting more closely with therequirements of the IAASB to provide more consistent global auditor reporting
requirements.
However, the Board recognizes that the regulatory environments in otherjurisdictions are different from the United States, requiring the Board to address unique
U.S. requirements and characteristics in its standard-setting projects. Because theBoard's standards have the force of law, the Board aims to make them as clear andeasy to apply as it can. For example, the factors that the auditor considers indetermining whether a matter involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex
auditor judgment are included in the standard; by contrast, while the IAASB approach
includes similar factors, they appear in the application and other explanatory material.
In addition, there are differences between requirements and terminology of theBoard's auditing standards and those of other regulators and standard setters that may
cause inconsistent application, even if the Board were to adopt the approach of anotherstandard setter. For example, the Board's requirements for communications to the audit
committee are not identical to the analogous requirements of the IAASB. Therefore,
although both critical audit matters and the IAASB's key audit matters are derived fromsuch communications, the matters ultimately discussed with the audit committee undereach framework would not necessarily be the same, which could result in differences inwhich matters are reported even if the language in the auditor reporting standards wereidentical. Also, the component of the definition of critical audit matter in the final
standard, namely "matters that involve especially challenging, subjective, or complex
auditor judgment" grounds the definition in the auditor's expertise and judgment.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 99

Although the processes of identifying these matters vary across jurisdictions, there arecommonalities in the underlying criteria regarding matters to be communicated and thecommunication requirements, such that expanded auditor reporting could result in thecommunication of many of the same matters under the various approaches.
e.

Auditor Assessment and Descriptions of Certain Financial Statement
Areas

Several commenters on the concept release suggested that investors would be
most interested in auditor reporting on the categories of information identified byinvestor respondents to the 2011 survey conducted by a working group of the IAG: (1)significant management estimates and judgments made in preparing the financial
statements and the auditor's assessment of them; (2) areas of high financial statement
and audit risk; (3) unusual transactions, restatements, and other significant changes in
the financial statements; and (4) the quality, not just the acceptability, of the company's
accounting practices and policies.184 This request was reiterated by several
commenters on the proposal, who continued to believe that this approach would provide
the information investors want most. In a similar vein, other commenters on the
reproposal have requested that the auditor provide a "grade" on management's
significant accounting estimates and judgments.
The Board believes that the final critical audit matter definition will likely cover
many of the topic areas requested by investors. For example, the auditor may
communicate critical audit matters related to significant management estimates andjudgments, highlight areas of high financial statement and audit risk, and discusssignificant unusual transactions. However, the auditor will not be required to report on
its assessment of management's significant estimates and judgments or on the quality(as opposed to merely the acceptability), of the company's accounting practices andpolicies or of the financial statements as a whole.
The final standard seeks to strike an appropriate balance between the value ofthe information being provided and the costs of providing it. Requiring auditors to reporttheir qualitative assessments in a manner that appears very precise (for example,
describing an estimate as "conservative" or "aggressive" or assigning the financial
statements an "A" or a "B") may impose significantly greater costs and unintended
consequences than the principles-based reporting of critical audit matters. For example,
although the reporting of qualitative assessments would appear to be precise, thesequalitative assessments are likely to be applied inconsistently because there is noframework for such assessments and the determinations are inherently subjective. In
addition, such assessments may heighten concerns related to the perceived level of184

See IAG 2011 survey.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 100

assurance provided by the audit or the perception that separate assurance is being
provided as to the assessed areas. Also, the reporting of such qualitative assessments
may subject auditors and companies to additional litigation risk beyond what may result
from the principles-based reporting of critical audit matters because the apparent
precision of the reporting may facilitate plaintiffs' claims.
2.

Policy Choicesa.

Definition of Critical Audit Matters

The Board considered a variety of possible approaches to the definition of critical
audit matters suggested by commenters. See Section IV.A.1 for a discussion of theBoard's considerations.
b.

Communication of Critical Audit Matters

The Board considered a variety of possible approaches to the communication
requirements for critical audit matters. See Section IV.A.2 for a discussion of theBoard's considerations.
c.

Auditor Tenure

The final standard retains the reproposed requirement to include a statement in
the auditor's report about auditor tenure.
In the reproposal, the Board solicited comment on whether disclosure of auditor
tenure should be made on Form AP instead of in the auditor's report. Form AP wasdeveloped as a means to address commenter concerns about the potential liability
implications of naming persons in the auditor's report. Because the disclosure of auditor
tenure does not have the same potential liability consequences, such an approach is
unnecessary in this case. In addition, some commenters preferred tenure disclosure on
Form AP because of a concern that disclosure in the auditor's report could result ininappropriate inferences about correlations between auditor tenure and audit quality, or
between auditor tenure and auditor independence. The Board is not persuaded by suchconcerns. Further, the final standard allows the auditor flexibility in the location of theauditor tenure disclosure in the auditor's report.
The Board determined that disclosure will be better achieved through theauditor's report because the information will be more readily accessible upon the filingwith the SEC of a document containing audited financial statements and poses lower
search costs, particularly for those investors who may prefer to have the information
provided in the auditor's primary means of communication. In addition, disclosing tenurein the auditor's report will make information available earlier to investors, which may
assist in their voting on auditor ratification. However, disclosing auditor tenure in the

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 101

auditor's report rather than Form AP could result in higher costs to investors that wish to
accumulate tenure data for a large number of companies or compare data acrosscompanies because these investors will have to acquire tenure data from eachcompany's auditor's report separately or from a data aggregator.
See also Section IV.B.1 for a discussion of the Board's considerations.
d.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The final standard includes a number of requirements that will enhance thestandardized content of the auditor's report by clarifying the auditor's role andresponsibilities related to the audit of the financial statements. These include, forexample, statements regarding auditor independence requirements and the addition of
the phrase "whether due to error or fraud," when describing the auditor's responsibility
under PCAOB standards to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. In addition, the final standard includes
requirements intended to promote uniformity in the form of the auditor's report. These
include requirements as to the addressee, a specific order of certain sections of theauditor's report, and required section headings.
Many commenters generally supported these enhancements and suggested thatsuch enhancements will increase the usability of the auditor's report by improving
financial statement users' understanding of the auditor's responsibilities, reducing
search costs for information in the auditor's report, and facilitating comparisons acrossauditor's reports.
VII.

Applicability of Critical Audit Matter Requirements

A.

Brokers and Dealers, Investment Companies, and Benefit Plans

The reproposed standard did not require communication of critical audit mattersfor audits of brokers and dealers reporting under Exchange Act Rule 17a-5, investmentcompanies other than business development companies ("BDCs"), and benefit plans.
The reproposing release described the Board's rationale, including economic
considerations, for such exclusions from the critical audit matter requirements and notedthat auditors of these entities would not be precluded from including critical audit
matters in the auditor's report voluntarily.
Commenters generally supported these exclusions, pointing to the same orsimilar reasons to those described by the Board in the reproposing release. Some
commenters asserted that the communication of critical audit matters should apply to allcompanies. One commenter supported voluntary communication of critical audit mattersfor the exempted entities. Another commenter disagreed with providing auditors theability to voluntarily communicate critical audit matters for brokers and dealers andPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 102

investment companies. This commenter also suggested that all broker-dealers,
including broker-dealers that are issuers, should be excluded from the requirement.
After considering the comments received and evaluating benefits and costs, thefinal standard excludes the audits of brokers and dealers that are reporting under
Exchange Act Rule 17a-5, investment companies other than BDCs, and benefit plans,from the critical audit matter requirements as reproposed.185 Auditors of these entities
may choose to include critical audit matters in the auditor's report voluntarily.
The Board's rationales for these exclusions are described below.
1.

Brokers and Dealers Reporting under Exchange Act Rule 17a-5

Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17a-5, the annual reports that brokers anddealers file with the SEC are public, except that if the statement of financial condition in
the financial report is bound separately from the balance of the annual report, thebalance of the annual report is deemed confidential and nonpublic.186 In this situation,
the auditor would generally issue two separate auditor's reports that would havedifferent content: (1) an auditor's report on the statement of financial condition thatwould be available to the public and (2) an auditor's report on the complete financial
report that, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2)(iv) of Exchange Act Rule 17a-5,
would be confidential and not available to the public.187 Research by the PCAOB's
Office of Economic and Risk Analysis ("ERA")188 indicates that, for approximately half ofbrokers and dealers, the complete financial report and the related auditor's report are
confidential and not available to the public.
In 2013, the Board adopted new standards related to brokers and dealers thatenhanced the auditor's performance and reporting responsibilities for financial

185

The other requirements of the final standard will be applicable to audits ofthese entities.
186

See Exchange Act Rule 17a-5(e), 17 CFR 240.17a-5(e).

187

See also Exchange Act Rule 17a-5(c)(2), 17 CFR 240.17a-5(c)(2),
regarding audited statements required to be provided to customers.
188

ERA's research was conducted on brokers and dealers who filed financial
statements through May 15, 2015, for fiscal years ended during 2014 that included audit
reports issued by firms registered with the PCAOB.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 103

statement audits, as well as engagements on compliance and exemption reports ofbrokers and dealers.189
Some commenters on the proposal asserted that the value of reporting critical
audit matters for brokers and dealers would be significantly limited by the closely held
nature of brokers and dealers; the limited number of users of their financial statements;
and the fact that, in many cases, only the statement of financial condition is available
publicly. Some commenters also recognized that both the SEC and PCAOB recently
updated their rules to further enhance reporting by brokers and dealers and theirauditors.
Research by ERA indicates that currently there are no brokers or dealers that areissuers. Rather, brokers and dealers are often owned by a holding company, anindividual, or a group of individuals that holds a controlling interest. The owners ofbrokers and dealers are generally part of the management of the entity and therefore
would have direct access to the auditor. Given that, in many cases, there is much lessseparation of ownership and control in brokers and dealers than in issuers, thecommunication of critical audit matters would provide little information about the audit
that would otherwise be unobtainable by investors.
Although there may be circumstances in which other financial statement users
may benefit from reduced information asymmetry about the audits of brokers anddealers, certain aspects of broker and dealer financial reporting may limit the benefits ofrequiring the communication of critical audit matters. For example, while other financial
statement users, such as customers of brokers and dealers, may benefit from increased
information about the audit, the ability for brokers and dealers to file certain financial
statements and schedules confidentially would require the auditor to identify andcommunicate critical audit matters that apply only to the publicly available statement offinancial condition. This may reduce the value of communicating critical audit matters for
brokers and dealers relative to issuers. Moreover, customers of brokers and dealers
may be interested in the overall financial position of the broker or dealer but may notbenefit from audit-specific information in the same way as investors in an issuer.
The communication of critical audit matters may also impose additional costs on
the auditors of brokers and dealers relative to the auditors of other types of companies,189

See Attestation Standards for Engagements Related to Broker and Dealer
Compliance or Exemption Reports Required by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards, PCAOB Release No.
2013-007 (Oct. 10, 2013) and Auditing Standard No. 17, Auditing Supplemental
Information Accompanying Audited Financial Statements and Related Amendments to
PCAOB Standards, PCAOB Release No. 2013-008 (Oct. 10, 2013).

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 104

as they would have to identify critical audit matters that apply exclusively to the publicly
available financial information, which may be difficult in some situations.
After consideration of the ownership and reporting characteristics of brokers anddealers, the comments received on the proposal and reproposal, and the Board's recent
standard-setting activities related to brokers and dealers, the Board does not believethat reporting of critical audit matters for brokers and dealers will provide meaningful
information in the same way as for issuers. Therefore, the communication of critical
audit matters is not required for audits of brokers and dealers reporting under Exchange
Act Rule 17a-5. If a broker or dealer were an issuer required to file audited financial
statements under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the requirements would
apply.
2.

Investment Companies

The Investment Company Act generally defines an investment company as any
issuer that is engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading insecurities.190 Most investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act
are required to file with the SEC annual reports on Form N-CSR containing audited
financial statements.191 The Investment Company Act includes specific requirements forinvestment companies, intended to reduce investors' risks, in areas such as aninvestment company's portfolio diversification, liquidity, leverage, and custody of
securities.192
In an SEC rulemaking, the SEC observed that commenters believed the key
information that investors use in deciding to invest in an investment company includes
an investment company's investment objectives, strategies, risks, costs, andperformance.193 The disclosure of information about these items appears in the annual
prospectus that investment companies provide to current and future investors.194
190

See Section 3(a)(1) of the Investment Company Act.

191

See SEC Rules under Section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act.

192

See, e.g., Sections 12, 13, and 17 of the Investment Company Act.

193

See SEC, Enhanced Disclosure and New Prospectus Delivery Option for
Registered Open-End Management Investment Companies, Securities Act Release No.
8998, 74 FR 4546 (Jan. 26, 2009). See also Investment Company Institute,
Understanding Investor Preferences for Mutual Fund Information (Aug. 2006) at 2–3.
194

See SEC Rules under Section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 105

Changes to investment objectives and strategies require shareholder approval ordisclosure.195
Several commenters on the proposal noted that an investor's decision to invest in
an investment company is primarily based on the investment objectives, risks,
performance, and fees, and critical audit matters are not expected to provide
information about these items and therefore would not be relevant. These and othercommenters generally stated that investment companies are designed for the sole
purpose of trading in and holding investments and auditor judgment would arise
primarily with respect to valuation of investments, which would tend to be repeated as a
critical audit matter. One of these commenters noted that, since the strategies ofinvestment companies do not change significantly over time, the critical audit mattersidentified could become standardized from one reporting period to the next and also
across funds with similar objectives.
Even though the disclosures required under the Investment Company Act andother federal securities laws provide investors with useful information, they may not fully
substitute for the communication of critical audit matters. The required communicationof critical audit matters contemplates that auditors would provide investors with auditspecific information, which is unlikely to appear in the disclosures provided bymanagement. In addition, some academic research documented a difference in theperceived usefulness and reliability of information depending on the location of thedisclosure and whether it was disclosed by management or by the independent
auditor.196 This academic research suggests that the auditor's communication of
information similar to critical audit matters may provide value to investors because itcomes from the auditor, even if the same information is disclosed by management in theexperimental design of the study.
The benefits of providing critical audit matters, however, may be smaller forinvestment companies, other than BDCs, relative to other types of companies becauseof their purpose and structure. Unlike companies whose business models can changeover time, investment companies have specific investment mandates that are disclosed
in the prospectus and rarely change. This creates the potential for critical audit mattersof investment companies to become excessively repetitive, making them uninformative.

195

See Sections 8(b) and 13(a)(3) of the Investment Company Act andInvestment Company Act Rule 8b-16.
196See, e.g., Christensen et al., Do Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs in the
Audit Report Change Nonprofessional Investors' Decision to Invest?

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 106

There may also be additional costs of applying critical audit matter requirements
to audits of investment companies, other than BDCs, as compared to audits of othertypes of companies. For example, in some cases, annual shareholder reports ofaffiliated investment companies with the same fiscal year-end might be filed with the
SEC in one document, which generally contains a single auditor's report that covers
multiple audited investment companies. In these situations, communicating critical audit
matters specific to each investment company may require the auditor to prepare
separate auditor's reports. This could increase costs for these types of investmentcompanies.
After consideration of the purpose and reporting characteristics of investmentcompanies and the comments received on the proposal and reproposal, the Board has
determined not to require the communication of critical audit matters for audits of mostinvestment companies, although they will apply to audits of investment companies
regulated as BDCs.197 Unlike the audits of many other investment companies, auditing
the valuation of BDCs' investments generally involves complexity and auditor judgments
due to the nature of the BDCs' portfolios. Also, because of the more diverse operationsof BDCs, such as providing managerial assistance and involvement with more complex
debt and equity instruments than other investment companies, communication of critical
audit matters in a BDC audit could be more informative to investors. Additionally, BDCs
follow a reporting regime under the Exchange Act that is more closely aligned with thatof companies to which the Board is applying the requirements for critical audit matters.
For these reasons, the Board believes it is appropriate for audits of BDCs to be subject
to critical audit matter requirements.
3.

Benefit plans

Benefit plans that purchase and hold securities of the plan sponsor using
participants' contributions are generally required to file with the SEC an annual report on
Form 11-K198 that includes the benefit plan's audited financial statements and therelated auditor's report.199 The audit of the financial statements included in a filing on
Form 11-K is performed in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Benefit plans
are also generally subject to the financial reporting requirements of the Employee

197

See Section 54 of the Investment Company Act.

198

See Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

199

A benefit plan's audited financial statements may also be included as partof the annual report of the issuer sponsoring the benefit plan. See Exchange Act Rule
15d-21, CFR 240.15d-21.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 107

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), including the U.S. Department ofLabor's ("DOL") rules and regulations for disclosure under ERISA.200
Participation in a benefit plan is limited to eligible employees of the plan sponsor.
Each plan participant in a defined contribution benefit plan is responsible for selecting,from the investment options made available by the plan sponsor, the specificinvestments in which the participant's funds are invested.
Employee stock benefit plans are generally less complex than other types ofcompanies because they are designed for the sole purpose of holding the plan'sinvestments for the participants' benefit. A plan's financial statements reflect summary
information about the plan's assets and liabilities by aggregating the balances of all plan
participants. However, only the individual account statements that plan participantsreceive periodically provide information specific to each participant's investments.
Several commenters on the proposal suggested excluding audits of benefit plansfrom the requirement for reporting critical audit matters due to the unique characteristicsof these entities and their differences from other types of companies. For example,
some commenters indicated that benefit plans are designed for a specific purpose and,as a result, would likely have similar critical audit matters from one reporting period tothe next. Other commenters noted that benefit plans are inherently less complex andentail fewer estimates and judgments.
The communication of critical audit matters could provide information about any
complex issues that were identified during the audit and how the auditor addressed
them. However, since a benefit plan's assets and liabilities aggregate the balances of allplan participants, the financial statements or related critical audit matters would notprovide actionable information about a plan participant's specific investment. Further,
given the nature of benefit plans, there is a chance that the same critical audit matterswould be communicated each year. For example, the valuation of investments is likely
to be the most complex area in the audit of a benefit plan and therefore may be a critical
audit matter in each reporting period, making the information less useful.

200

ERISA Section 103(a)(3)(A) requires a plan administrator to engage an
independent auditor to conduct an examination of the plan's financial statements andrequired schedules in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. See 29
CFR 2520.103-1. Benefit plans subject to ERISA also file with the DOL an annual reporton Form 5500, including audited financial statements and an auditor's report. See also
FASB ASC 960-10-05-6.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 108

After consideration of the structure and reporting characteristics of benefit plans
and the comments received on the proposal and reproposal, the Board has determined
not to require the communication of critical audit matters for audits of benefit plans.
B.

Smaller Companies

The reproposal sought comment on whether the critical audit matter
requirements should not apply to audits of other types of companies, in addition to the
exempted entities discussed above. Some commenters asserted that thecommunication of critical audit matters should apply to all companies. Other
commenters recommended that the Board give consideration to not applying the critical
audit matter requirements to audits of smaller reporting companies201 andnonaccelerated filers202 due to their smaller size and because, in the commenters' view,communication of critical audit mattes would not provide sufficient benefits for thesecompanies to justify the costs.
Academic research suggests that smaller companies have a higher degree of
information asymmetry relative to the broader population of companies. Although thedegree of information asymmetry surrounding a particular issuer is unobservable,
researchers have developed a number of proxies that are thought to be correlated withinformation asymmetry, including small issuer size, lower analyst coverage, larger
insider holdings, and higher research and development costs.203 To the extent that a
201

In general, a "smaller reporting company" means an issuer with less than
$75 million in public float or zero public float and annual revenues of less than $50
million during the most recently completed fiscal year for which audited financial
statements are available. See Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, 17 CFR 240.12b-2. Smallerreporting companies currently make up approximately 42 percent of Form 10-K filers.
The SEC recently proposed changes to the definition of smaller reporting companies,
which would increase the percentage of smaller reporting companies to approximately
52 percent of Form 10-K filers. See SEC, Amendments to Smaller Reporting Company
Definition, Release No. 33-10107 (June 27, 2016), 81 FR 43130 (July 1, 2016).
202

Nonaccelerated filers are not defined in SEC rules but are generally
understood to be companies that do not meet the definition of large accelerated filer oraccelerated filer.
203

See, e.g., David Aboody, and Baruch Lev, Information Asymmetry, R&D,
and Insider Gains, 55 The Journal of Finance 2747, 2747-2766 (2000), Michael J.
Brennan and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, Investment Analysis and Price Formation in
Securities Markets, 38 Journal of Financial Economics 361, 361-381 (1995),
Varadarajan V. Chari, Ravi Jagannathan, and Aharon R. Ofer, Seasonalities in Security
Returns: The Case of Earnings Announcements, 21 Journal of Financial Economics

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 109

smaller company can be characterized as exhibiting one or more of these properties,
this may suggest that it has a greater degree of information asymmetry relative to thebroader population of companies. This would suggest that there is a higher likelihoodthat critical audit matters could provide new information about a smaller company than alarge one for which there already exists a variety of information sources (such as annual
reports, news media, and analyst research reports).
After consideration of comments, academic research, and data regarding thenumber of such companies, the final standard does not exclude smaller companies fromthe critical audit matter requirements. However, as discussed below, the Board has
determined that it is appropriate to give auditors of smaller companies additional time to
implement the new requirements. If approved by the SEC, auditors of companies thatare not large accelerated filers will have an additional 18 months to implement therequirements for critical audit matters and will be able to benefit from the experiences ofauditors of larger companies.
Requirements of Other Regulators and Standard Setters
Under the IAASB's standard, the communication of key audit matters applies tolisted entities.204 The EU requirements apply to audits of PIEs, including listedcompanies, credit institutions, and insurance companies.205 The FRC 2013
requirements apply to auditor's reports for entities that apply the UK Corporate
Governance Code.206
VIII.

Considerations for Audits of Emerging Growth Companies

Section 104 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups ("JOBS") Act imposescertain limitations with respect to application of the Board's standards to audits of EGCs,
as defined in Section 3(a)(80) of the Exchange Act. Section 104 provides that "[a]ny
101, 101-121 (1988), and Raymond Chiang, and P. C. Venkatesh, Insider Holdings andPerceptions of Information Asymmetry: A note, 43 The Journal of Finance 1041, 10411048 (1988).
204

See paragraph 5 of ISA 701.

205

See requirements in 1 of Article 2, Audit Report of Regulation (EU) No

537/2014.
206

These include companies with a premium listing of equity shares on the
London Stock Exchange regardless of whether they are incorporated in the U.K. or
elsewhere.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 110

rules of the Board requiring . . . a supplement to the auditor's report in which the auditor
would be required to provide additional information about the audit and the financial
statements of the issuer (auditor discussion and analysis) shall not apply to an audit ofan emerging growth company . . ."207 Auditor discussion and analysis ("AD&A") does
not exist in auditing standards. The idea was introduced in the concept release, which
described AD&A as one of several conceptual alternatives for changing the auditor'sreporting model.208
Section 104 of the JOBS Act further provides that any additional rules adopted by
the Board subsequent to April 5, 2012, do not apply to the audits of EGCs unless the
SEC "determines that the application of such additional requirements is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, after considering the protection of investors, andwhether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation."209 As aresult of the JOBS Act, the final standard and amendments are subject to an evaluation
as to whether they could, and if so, should be applicable to the audits of EGCs.
A.

Critical Audit Matters

The reproposal solicited comment on the application of critical audit matter
requirements to the audits of EGCs. Commenters on this issue generally favored
applying the standard to audits of EGCs, primarily because investors in thesecompanies would benefit from the additional information communicated in the auditor'sreport in the same way that investors in larger companies would. Two commenters
recommended that the critical audit matter requirements not apply to audits of EGCs
because there would not be sufficient benefits to justify the costs.
Three commenters addressed the legal question of whether the JOBS Act
provision on AD&A would prohibit the Board from applying critical audit matter
requirements to audits of EGCs. Two of these commenters suggested that this would be

207

See Pub. L. No. 112-106 (Apr. 5, 2012). See Section 103(a)(3)(C) of
Sarbanes-Oxley, as added by Section 104 of the JOBS Act.
208

See PCAOB Release No. 2011-003 (June 21, 2011) at 2 (describing one
alternative as "a supplement to the auditor's report in which the auditor would be
required to provide additional information about the audit and the company's financial
statements (an 'Auditor's Discussion and Analysis')"). Section IV.A., Auditor's
Discussion and Analysis, of the proposal further described AD&A and related comments
received on the concept release.
209

Supra note 207.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 111
prohibited, on the basis that critical audit matters "appear substantively similar to"210 or"closely resemble"211 AD&A. The SEC's Investor Advocate stated that, from a policy
perspective, critical audit matter requirements should apply to audits of EGCs, andrecommended that the PCAOB adopt the standard for policy reasons and let the SEC
determine the legal question.212 This commenter also recommended that, "to prepare
for any outcome of [the SEC's] determination," the PCAOB should "encourage auditors,
on a voluntary basis, to include critical audit matter communications in the auditor'sreports on EGCs."213
The requirements for critical audit matters share characteristics with two of thealternative approaches described in the concept release: required and expanded
explanatory paragraphs and AD&A. Similar to critical audit matters, required andexpanded explanatory paragraphs involved additional paragraphs in the auditor's reportthat would have highlighted areas of critical importance to the financial statements, withauditor comment on key audit procedures and a reference to relevant financial
statement accounts and disclosure. AD&A, by contrast, envisioned a supplemental
report in addition to the auditor's report that could cover a broad range of issues,
including the auditor's views regarding the company's financial statements, material
matters as to which the auditor believed disclosure could be enhanced, and areas
where management could have applied different accounting or disclosure approaches.
However, critical audit matters go beyond the content of a required andexpanded explanatory paragraph by including a discussion of the principal reasons theauditor determined that a matter was a critical audit matter. Further, although this is not
required, critical audit matters could potentially include a discussion of auditor findings.
These additional elements may make critical audit matters resemble AD&A in somerespects. This potential similarity, together with the fact that there has been no
authoritative interpretation of Section 104 of the JOBS Act, creates some uncertainty as
210

See letter from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Center for CapitalMarkets Competitiveness (Aug. 15, 2016) at 10, available on the Board's website inDocket 034.
211

See letter from Robert N. Waxman (Aug. 15, 2016) at 24, available on the
Board's website in Docket 034.
212

See letter from Rick A. Fleming, Investor Advocate, SEC (Aug. 15, 2016)at 5-6, available on the Board's website in Docket 034 (noting that "the SEC will need tomake a legal determination on whether such a requirement with respect to the audits of
EGCs would accord with certain provisions of" the JOBS Act).
213

Id. at 6.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 112

to whether it is legally permissible for critical audit matter requirements to be mandated
for EGC audits. In view of this uncertainty, the Board has determined not to apply therequirements regarding critical audit matters to audits of EGCs at this time.
As with other audits where critical audit matter requirements do not apply,
voluntary application is permissible. EGCs and their auditors can consider whether
investors would benefit from additional information about the audit from the auditor's
point of view.
B.

Additional Improvements to the Auditor's Report

The additional improvements to the auditor's report contained in the final
standard and amendments do not raise concerns under the AD&A provisions of the
JOBS Act, but instead fall within the category of "additional rules" that may not beapplied to audits of EGCs unless the SEC determines that doing so "is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, after considering the protection of investors, andwhether the action will promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation." The
Board is providing this analysis to assist the SEC in making this determination.
To inform consideration of the application of auditing standards to audits of
EGCs, the staff has also published a white paper that provides general information
about characteristics of EGCs.214 The data on EGCs outlined in the white paper remains
generally consistent with the data discussed in the reproposal. A majority of EGCs
continue to be smaller public companies that are generally new to the SEC reporting
process. This suggests that there is less information available to investors regarding
such companies (a higher degree of information asymmetry) relative to the broader
population of public companies because, in general, investors are less informed aboutcompanies that are smaller and newer. For example, smaller companies have very little,
if any, analyst coverage which reduces the amount of information made available tofinancial statement users and therefore makes markets less efficient.215
The reproposal solicited comment on whether the elements of the reproposed
standard and amendments other than the requirements for critical audit matters should
apply to the audits of EGCs. As noted above, one commenter supported application of
the entire standard and amendments to EGCs (without differentiating between critical
audit matters and other elements), and one commenter opposed application of the214

See White Paper on Characteristics of Emerging Growth Companies as ofNovember 15, 2016 (Mar. 28, 2017), available on the Board's website in Docket 034.
215

See SEC, Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Smaller PublicCompanies to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Apr. 23, 2006) at 73.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 113

entire standard and amendments. In addition, one commenter supported applying someof the reproposed improvements to the auditor's report to audits of EGCs (therequirement as to addressee and the clarifications of existing auditor responsibilities, aswell as a modified version of the statement regarding auditor independence), but
generally opposed the other aspects of the reproposal for both EGCs and othercompanies.
As described in Section VI.C.2. above, the additional improvements to theauditor's report are intended to provide a consistent location and decrease search costswith respect to information about auditor tenure, enhance users' understanding of theauditor's role, make the auditor's report easier to read and facilitate comparison acrosscompanies by making the format consistent. As described in Section VI.D.1.b. above,the costs associated with these changes are not expected to be significant and areprimarily one-time, rather than recurring, costs.
For the reasons explained above, the Board believes that the additional
improvements to the auditor's report contained in the final standard and amendments
are in the public interest and, after considering the protection of investors and thepromotion of efficiency, competition, and capital formation, recommends that the final
standard and amendments should apply to audits of EGCs. Accordingly, the Board
recommends that the SEC determine that it is necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, after considering the protection of investors and whether the action will promote
efficiency, competition, and capital formation, to apply the final standard andamendments, other than the provisions relating to critical audit matters, to audits of
EGCs. The Board stands ready to assist the SEC in considering any comments the
SEC receives on these matters during the SEC's public comment process.
IX.

Effective Date

The reproposal sought comment on how much time auditors would need to
implement the standard, if adopted by the Board and approved by the SEC. The
reproposal also solicited input on whether the Board should consider a delayedcompliance date for the reproposed standard, or for certain parts of the reproposed
standard, for audits of smaller companies and, if so, what criteria the Board should use
in its consideration.
Commenters suggested a wide range of effective dates for the standard. Some
commenters encouraged expeditious adoption of the final standard. One of thesecommenters suggested an effective date for audits of financial statements for periods
ending on or after December 2017. Some commenters recommended that the effective
date be a year after approval by the SEC, but no earlier than for auditor's reports issued
on or after December 15, 2018. Other commenters suggested that the effective date beno earlier than for audit periods ending two years after approval by the SEC, primarily

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 114

because of the audit firms' need to develop and implement training and quality control
processes to support expanded auditor reporting. One commenter suggested that theBoard delay the effective date until after the implementation of FASB ASU No. 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (which, for issuers, will apply for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2017).
Many commenters supported phased implementation of the final standard, or of
the portion of the standard related to communication of critical audit matters, suggestingthat implementation start with large accelerated filers216 and a year later become
effective for other companies in order to allow auditors of smaller companies to benefit
from the experience of the audits of large accelerated filers.
After considering the comments received, the Board has chosen a phased
approach to the effective date for the new requirements. If approved by the SEC, thefinal standard and related amendments to auditing standards will take effect as follows:All paragraphs of the final standard and related amendments, except theparagraphs in the Critical Audit Matters section of the standard(paragraphs .11 through .17) and amendments related to thoseparagraphs: audits of fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2017.



All paragraphs in the Critical Audit Matters section of the final standard
and amendments related to those paragraphs:o

For audits of large accelerated filers: fiscal years ending on or afterJune 30, 2019; andoFor audits of all other companies to which the requirements apply:
fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2020.

A phased approach to the effective date will provide investors and other financial
statement users with the new form auditor's report, other than the communication ofcritical audit matters, as soon as reasonably practicable. The later effective dates for thecommunication of critical audit matters provide accounting firms, companies, and audit
committees more time to prepare for implementation of the requirements that are
expected to require more effort to implement than the additional improvements to theauditor's report.
216

In general, "large accelerated filer" means an issuer with a public float of$700 million or more that has been subject to Exchange Act periodic reporting
requirements for at least one year and has filed at least one annual report. See
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, 17 CFR 240.12b-2.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 115

In selecting the effective date of the critical audit matter requirements for auditsof large accelerated filers, the Board considered commenter suggestions that large
accelerated filers and their auditors217 generally have more resources to address the
new requirements to help establish best practice as compared to smaller companies
and their auditors. Further, the Board did not choose a calendar year-end effective dateto allow auditors of large accelerated filers to gain experience implementing the critical
audit matter communications at a time when fewer audits are being completed, outsideof the busy calendar year-end reporting cycle.218
In response to comments, the effective date of the final standard with respect tothe communication of critical audit matters is delayed by 18 months for audits ofcompanies that are not large accelerated filers. In determining to adopt the effective
date for these audits, the Board agreed with commenter input that auditors of smaller
companies, which are often smaller audit firms, could benefit from the experience of theaudits of large accelerated filers. In addition, the phased effective date may facilitate
any post-implementation review of the impact of the final standard.
Auditors may elect to comply before the effective date, at any point after SEC
approval of the final standard.
***

217

Research by ERA indicates that approximately 79 percent of the large
accelerated filers that filed audited financial statements with the SEC during the 18
months prior to December 31, 2016 are audited by the four largest US audit firms(measured by number of issuer audits); 6 percent are audited by other annuallyinspected US firms; and the rest are audited by triennially inspected firms—13 percent
by non-US affiliates of the six largest US firms (measured by number of issuer audits)and 2 percent by other US firms.
218

Research by ERA indicates that approximately 11 percent of the large
accelerated filers that filed audited financial statements with the SEC during the 18
months prior to December 31, 2016 have year ends between June 30 and November
30.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Page 116

On the 1st day of June, in the year 2017, the foregoing was, in accordance withthe bylaws of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,

ADOPTED BY THE BOARD.

/s/ Phoebe W. Brown
Phoebe W. Brown
SecretaryPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 1

APPENDIX 1
AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial
Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion
Introduction.01
The auditor's report contains either an expression of opinion on thefinancial statements,1 taken as a whole,2 or an assertion that an opinion cannot
be expressed. This standard establishes requirements regarding the content of
the auditor's written report when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion on
the financial statements (the "auditor's unqualified report").3.02
The auditor is in a position to express an unqualified opinion on thefinancial statements when the auditor conducted an audit in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") andconcludes that the financial statements, taken as a whole, are presented fairly, inall material respects,4 in conformity with the applicable financial reporting
1

This standard uses the term "financial statements" as used by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") to include all notes to thestatements and all related schedules. See Regulation S-X Rule 1-01(b), 17 CFR
210.1-01(b). This and other PCAOB standards often refer to the notes as
disclosures; see, e.g., AS 2110, Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material
Misstatement.
2"Taken as a whole" applies equally to a complete set of financial
statements and to an individual financial statement with appropriate disclosures.
3

Paragraphs .85-.98 and Appendix C, Special Reporting Situations,of AS 2201, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is
Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements, address the form and content
of the auditor's report when the auditor performs an audit of internal control overfinancial reporting.
4

AS 2815, The Meaning of "Present Fairly in Conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles," describes the basis for an auditor's
responsibility for forming an opinion on whether the company's financial
statements are presented fairly in conformity with the applicable financial
reporting framework.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 2framework.5.03
When the auditor conducts an audit of financial statements in accordancewith the standards of the PCAOB, some circumstances require that the auditor
express a qualified opinion, adverse opinion, or disclaimer of opinion on thefinancial statements and state the reasons for the departure from the unqualified
opinion. AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances, describes reporting requirements related to departures fromunqualified opinions and other reporting circumstances.

Objectives.04
The objectives of the auditor when the auditor concludes that an
unqualified opinion is appropriate are to:a.

Issue a written report that expresses an unqualified opinion on thefinancial statements and describes the basis for that opinion; andb.

Communicate in the auditor's unqualified report critical audit
matters,6 when required, relating to the audit of the financial
statements or state that the auditor determined that there are no
critical audit matters.

The Auditor's Unqualified Report.05

The auditor's unqualified report includes:7a.

The basic elements,8 as described in paragraphs .06-.10;5

The auditor should look to the requirements of the SEC for thecompany under audit with respect to the accounting principles applicable to thatcompany.
6This term is defined in Appendix A, Definitions, and is set inboldface type the first time it appears.
7
8

Appendix B provides an illustrative auditor's unqualified report.

Laws, rules, and forms may contain requirements for auditor'sreports of different types of companies. See, e.g., Sections 30(g) and 32(a)(4) of
the Investment Company Act; Regulation S-X Rule 2-02, 17 CFR 210.2-02; andPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 3b.

Communication regarding critical audit matters relating to the auditof the current period's financial statements, as described inparagraphs .11-.17, unless such requirements do not apply;
Note: Communication of critical audit matters is not required foraudits of (1) brokers9 and dealers10 reporting under Exchange
Act Rule 17a-5; (2) investment companies registered under theInvestment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company
Act"),11 other than companies that have elected to be regulated
as business development companies;12 (3) employee stock
purchase, savings, and similar plans;13 and (4) emerging
growth companies.14 Auditors of these entities may consider
voluntarily including communication of critical audit matters as
described in this standard.

c.

Other explanatory language (or an explanatory paragraph), asappropriate in the circumstances, as described in paragraphs .18.19; andd.

Information about certain audit participants, if the auditor decides toprovide this information in the auditor's report, as described inparagraph .20.

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") Rule 17a-5, 17 CFR 240.17a5. Auditor's reports on financial statements filed with the SEC are subject to allsuch applicable requirements.
9

See PCAOB Rule 1001(b)(iii).

10

See PCAOB Rule 1001(d)(iii).

11

See Section 8 of the Investment Company Act.

12

See Section 54 of the Investment Company Act.

13

See Exchange Act Rule 15d-21, 17 CFR 240.15d-21.

14

See Section 3(a)(80) of the Exchange Act.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 4

Basic Elements
Title
.06
The auditor's report must include the title, "Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm."
Addressee.07
The auditor's report must be addressed to the shareholders and the boardof directors, or equivalents for companies not organized as corporations. The
auditor's report may include additional addressees.
Opinion on the Financial Statements.08
The first section of the auditor's report must include the section title"Opinion on the Financial Statements" and the following elements:a.

The name of the company whose financial statements wereaudited;b.

A statement identifying each financial statement and any relatedschedule(s) that has been audited;15c.

The date of, or period covered by, each financial statement andrelated schedule, if applicable, identified in the report;d.

A statement indicating that the financial statements, including therelated notes and any related schedule(s), identified andcollectively referred to in the report as the financial statements,
were audited; ande.

An opinion that the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the company as of the balance

15

Various SEC rules and forms require that companies file schedules
of information and that those schedules be audited if the company's financial
statements are audited. See, e.g., Regulation S-X Rules 5-04, 6-10, 6A-05, and7-05, 17 CFR 210.5-04, 210.6-10, 210.6A-05, 210.7-05. See generally,
Regulation S-X Rule 12-01, 17 CFR 210.12-01, et seq., which address the formand content of certain SEC-required schedules.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 5

sheet date and the results of its operations and its cash flows forthe period then ended in conformity with the applicable financial
reporting framework.16 The opinion should also include an
identification of the applicable financial reporting framework.
Basis for Opinion.09
The second section of the auditor's report must include the section title"Basis for Opinion" and the following elements:a.

A statement that the financial statements are the responsibility of
the company's management;b.

A statement that the auditor's responsibility is to express an opinion
on the financial statements based on the audit;c.

A statement that the audit was conducted in accordance with thestandards of the PCAOB;d.

A statement that PCAOB standards require that the auditor planand perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud;e.

A statement that the audit included:

16

(1)

Performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due toerror or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to
those risks;(2)

Examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements;(3)

Evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management; andThe terms used in the Opinion on the Financial Statements section,such as financial position, results of operations and cash flows, should be
modified, as appropriate, depending on the type of company and financial
statements being audited.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 6(4)

Evaluating thestatements;

overallpresentation

of

the

financialf.

A statement that the auditor believes that the audit provides areasonable basis for the auditor's opinion; andg.

A statement that the auditor is a public accounting firm registeredwith the PCAOB (United States) and is required to be independent
with respect to the company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC
and the PCAOB.

Signature, Tenure, Location, and Date
.10

The auditor's report must include the following elements:a.

The signature of the auditor's firm;17b.

A statement containing the year the auditor began serving
consecutively as the company's auditor;18
Note: For purposes of this subparagraph, references to theauditor include other firms that the auditor's firm has acquiredor that have merged with the auditor's firm. If there is
uncertainty as to the year the auditor began serving
consecutively as the company's auditor, such as due to firm orcompany mergers, acquisitions, or changes in ownership
structure, the auditor should state that the auditor is uncertain
as to the year the auditor became the company's auditor andprovide the earliest year of which the auditor has knowledge.

c.

The city and state (or city and country, in the case of non-U.S.
auditors) from which the auditor's report has been issued;19 and

17

See Regulation S-X Rule 2-02(a), 17 CFR 210.2-02(a).

18

For an investment company that is part of a group of investmentcompanies, the statement contains the year the auditor began serving
consecutively as the auditor of any investment company in the group ofinvestment companies. See Section 12(d)(1)(G)(ii) of the Investment Company
Act.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 7d.

The date of the auditor's report.20

Critical Audit Matters
Determination of Critical Audit Matters.11
The auditor must determine whether there are any critical audit matters in
the audit of the current period's financial statements. A critical audit matter is any
matter arising from the audit of the financial statements that was communicatedor required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2)involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment. Critical
audit matters are not a substitute for the auditor's departure from an unqualified
opinion (i.e., a qualified opinion, adverse opinion, or disclaimer of opinion on thefinancial statements as described in AS 3105).
.12
In determining whether a matter involved especially challenging,
subjective, or complex auditor judgment, the auditor should take into account,alone or in combination, the following factors, as well as other factors specific to
the audit:a.

The auditor's assessment of the risks of material misstatement,
including significant risks;b.

The degree of auditor judgment related to areas in the financial
statements that involved the application of significant judgment or
estimation by management, including estimates with significant
measurement uncertainty;c.

The nature and timing of significant unusual transactions and theextent of audit effort and judgment related to these transactions;d.

The degree of auditor subjectivity in applying audit procedures toaddress the matter or in evaluating the results of those procedures;e.

The nature and extent of audit effort required to address the matter,
including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed or the19

See Regulation S-X Rule 2-02(a).

20

See AS 3110, Dating of the Independent Auditor's Report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 8nature of consultations outside the engagement team regarding thematter; andf.

The nature of audit evidence obtained regarding the matter.

Note: It is expected that, in most audits, the auditor would determinethat at least one matter involved especially challenging, subjective, orcomplex auditor judgment.
Communication of Critical Audit Matters.13
The auditor must communicate in the auditor's report critical audit
matters21 relating to the audit of the current period's financial statements or statethat the auditor determined that there are no critical audit matters.
Note: When the current period's financial statements are presented
on a comparative basis with those of one or more prior periods, theauditor may communicate critical audit matters relating to a priorperiod. This may be appropriate, for example, when (1) the priorperiod's financial statements are made public for the first time, suchas in an initial public offering, or (2) issuing an auditor's report on theprior period's financial statements because the previously issued
auditor's report could no longer be relied upon.
.14
For each critical audit matter communicated in the auditor's report theauditor must:a.

Identify the critical audit matter;b.

Describe the principal considerations that led the auditor todetermine that the matter is a critical audit matter;

21

Critical audit matters are not a substitute for required explanatory
language (paragraphs) described in paragraph .18. If a matter that meets thedefinition of a critical audit matter also requires an explanatory paragraph, suchas a matter related to going concern, the auditor may include the information
required under paragraph .14 in the explanatory paragraph with a crossreference in the critical audit matters section of the auditor's report to the
explanatory paragraph. Alternatively, the auditor may include the explanatory
paragraph and critical audit matter communication separately in the auditor'sreport and add a cross-reference between the two sections.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 9c.

Describe how the critical audit matter was addressed in the audit;
andNote: In describing how the critical audit matter wasaddressed in the audit, the auditor may describe: (1) the
auditor's response or approach that was most relevant to thematter; (2) a brief overview of the audit procedures
performed; (3) an indication of the outcome of the audit
procedures; and (4) key observations with respect to thematter, or some combination of these elements.

d.

Refer to the relevant financial statement accounts or disclosuresthat relate to the critical audit matter.

Note 1: Language that could be viewed as disclaiming, qualifying,
restricting, or minimizing the auditor's responsibility for the critical
audit matters or the auditor's opinion on the financial statements is
not appropriate and may not be used. The language used tocommunicate a critical audit matter should not imply that the auditor
is providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on theaccounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Note 2: When describing critical audit matters in the auditor's report,
the auditor is not expected to provide information about the company
that has not been made publicly available by the company unlesssuch information is necessary to describe the principal
considerations that led the auditor to determine that a matter is a
critical audit matter or how the matter was addressed in the audit.
Language Preceding Critical Audit Matters in the Auditor's Report.15
The following language, including the section title "Critical Audit Matters,"
should precede critical audit matters communicated in the auditor's report:
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising fromthe current period audit of the financial statements that werecommunicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee andthat: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial
statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, orcomplex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does notalter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole,PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 10

and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below,
providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts
or disclosures to which they relate.
Note: If the auditor communicates critical audit matters for priorperiods, the language preceding the critical audit matters should be
modified to indicate the periods to which the critical audit mattersrelate.
.16
In situations in which the auditor determines that there are no critical audit
matters, the auditor should include the following language, including the section
title "Critical Audit Matters," in the auditor's report:
Critical Audit Matters
Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of
the financial statements that were communicated or required to becommunicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts ordisclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved
our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. We
determined that there are no critical audit matters.
Documentation of Critical Audit Matters.17

For each matter arising from the audit of the financial statements that:a.

Was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit
committee; andb.

Relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial
statements;

the auditor must document whether or not the matter was determined to be a
critical audit matter (i.e., involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex
auditor judgment) and the basis for such determination.22

22

Consistent with the requirements of AS 1215, Audit Documentation,
the audit documentation should be in sufficient detail to enable an experienced
auditor, having no previous connection with the engagement, to understand thedeterminations made to comply with the provisions of this standard.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 11

Explanatory Language Added to the Auditor's Report.18
Other standards of the PCAOB require that, in certain circumstances, theauditor include explanatory language (or an explanatory paragraph) in theauditor's report, while not affecting the auditor's opinion on the financial
statements. These circumstances include when:a.

There is substantial doubt about the company's ability to continue
as a going concern;23b.

The auditor decides to refer to the report of other auditors as thebasis, in part, for the auditor's own report;24c.

There has been a change between periods in accounting principles
or in the method of their application that has a material effect on thefinancial statements;25

d.

There has been a change in a reporting entity, unless the change inthe reporting entity results from a transaction or event, such as thecreation, cessation, or complete or partial purchase or disposition of
a subsidiary or other business unit;26e.

A material misstatement in previously issued financial statements
has been corrected;27f.

The auditor performs an integrated audit and issues separate
reports on the company's financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting;28

23

See AS 2415, Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern.
24

See paragraphs .06-.09 of AS 1205, Part of the Audit Performed by
Other Independent Auditors.
25

See paragraphs .08 and .12-.15 of AS 2820, Evaluating
Consistency of Financial Statements.
26

See AS 2820.06.

27

See AS 2820.09 and .16-.17.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 12g.

Management is required to report on the company's internal
controls over financial reporting but such report is not required to beaudited,29 and the auditor has not been engaged to perform anaudit of management's assessment of the effectiveness of thecompany's internal control over financial reporting; 30h.

Certain circumstances relating to reports on comparative financial
statements exist;31

i.

Selected quarterly financial data required by Item 302(a) ofRegulation S-K is not appropriately presented, has been omitted, or
has not been reviewed;32j.

Supplementary information required by the applicable financial
reporting framework has been omitted, the presentation of suchinformation departs materially from the requirements of theapplicable financial reporting framework, the auditor is unable tocomplete prescribed procedures with respect to such information,or the auditor is unable to remove substantial doubts about whether
the supplementary information conforms to the requirements of theapplicable financial reporting framework;33

28

See AS 2201.88. AS 2201 provides additional circumstances inwhich the auditor includes an explanatory paragraph. If the combined report isissued, AS 2201 notes that the auditor should consider those circumstances as
well.
29

See Item 308 of Regulation S-K.

30

See AS 3105.59-.60.

31

See AS 3105.52-.53 and .56-.58.

32

See paragraph .50 of AS 4105, Reviews of Interim Financial

Information.
33

Information.

See paragraphs .03 and .08 of AS 2705, Required SupplementaryPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 13k.

There has been a change in an investee year end that has amaterial effect on the company's financial statements;34 andl.

Other information in a document containing audited financial
statements is materially inconsistent with information appearing in
the financial statements.35

Emphasis of a Matter.19
The auditor may emphasize a matter regarding the financial statements inthe auditor's report ("emphasis paragraph").36 The following are examples ofmatters, among others, that might be emphasized in the auditor's report:37a.

Significant transactions, including significant transactions withrelated parties;b.

Unusually important subsequent events, such as a catastrophe thathas had, or continues to have, a significant effect on the company's
financial position;c.

Accounting matters, other than those involving a change orchanges in accounting principles, affecting the comparability of thefinancial statements with those of the preceding period;d.

An uncertainty relating to the future outcome of significant litigation
or regulatory actions; ande.

That the entity is a component of a larger business enterprise.

34

See paragraph .32 of AS 2503, Auditing Derivative Instruments,
Hedging Activities, and Investments in Securities.
35

See paragraph .04 of AS 2710, Other Information in Documents
Containing Audited Financial Statements.
36

Emphasis paragraphs are never required and are not a substitutefor required critical audit matters described in paragraphs .11-.17.
37

It is not appropriate for the auditor to use phrases such as "with theforegoing [following] explanation" in the opinion paragraph when an emphasis
paragraph is included in the auditor's report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 14

If the auditor adds an emphasis paragraph in the auditor's report, theauditor should use an appropriate section title.

Information about Certain Audit Participants.20
The auditor may include in the auditor's report information regarding theengagement partner and/or other accounting firms participating in the audit thatis required to be reported on PCAOB Form AP, Auditor Reporting of Certain
Audit Participants.38 If the auditor decides to provide information about theengagement partner, other accounting firms participating in the audit, or both, theauditor must disclose the following:a.

Engagement partner—the engagement partner's full name as
required on Form AP; orb.

Other accounting firms participating in the audit:

38i.

A statement that the auditor is responsible for the audits or
audit procedures performed by the other public accounting
firms and has supervised or performed procedures toassume responsibility for their work in accordance withPCAOB standards;ii.

Other accounting firms individually contributing 5% or moreof total audit hours—for each firm, (1) the firm's legal name,(2) the city and state (or, if outside the United States, cityand country) of headquarters' office, and (3) percentage of
total audit hours as a single number or within an appropriate
range, as is required to be reported on Form AP; andiii.

Other accounting firms individually contributing less than 5%of total audit hours—(1) the number of other accounting
firms individually representing less than 5% of total audit
hours and (2) the aggregate percentage of total audit hours
of such firms as a single number or within an appropriate
range, as is required to be reported on Form AP.

If the auditor decides to include information regarding certain audit
participants in the auditor's report, the auditor should use an appropriate section
title.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 15

APPENDIX A – Definition
A1. For purposes of this standard, the term listed below is defined as follows:
A2. Critical audit matter – Any matter arising from the audit of the financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit
committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to
the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, orcomplex auditor judgment.
Note: Required audit committee communications are set forth in
PCAOB standards, including AS 1301, Communications with Audit
Committees, and Appendix B of that standard which refers to other
PCAOB rules and standards.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 16

APPENDIX B – An Illustrative Auditor's Unqualified Report
Including Critical Audit Matters
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows], for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 20X2, and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred
to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of [at]December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20X2, inconformity with [the applicable financial reporting framework].
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing
procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our
audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentationof the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 1 – Final Standard
Page A1 – 17

Critical Audit Matters [if applicable]
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from thecurrent period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or
required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate toaccounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2)involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The
communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on
the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating
the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit
matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
[Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-1

APPENDIX 2
Amendments to Other PCAOB Standards Related to the ProposedStandard
In connection with a new auditor reporting standard AS 3101, The Auditor'sReport on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified
Opinion (the "final standard"), the Board is adopting related amendments to several of
its other auditing standards as set out below. Language that is deleted by theamendments is struck through. Language that is added is underlined. Language that is
moved without being modified, such as changes to the illustrative auditor's report toconform to the required order in the final standard, is double underlined.

Contents
I. Amendments to AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances ......................................................................................A2-2
II. Amendments to Other Auditing Standards ......................................................A2-4646
III. Amendments to Auditing Interpretations .........................................................A2-9090

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-2

I.

Amendments to AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances

AS 3101: Reports on Audited Financial Statements AS 3105, Departures from
Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances

Introduction.01 This section applies to auditors' reports issued in connection with audits1 ofhistorical financial statements that are intended to present financial position, results ofoperations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
It distinguishes the types of reports, describes the circumstances in which each isappropriate, and provides example reports.
Note: When performing an integrated audit of financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting, the auditor may choose to issue a combined report or separate
reports on the company's financial statements and on internal control over financial
reporting. Refer to paragraphs .85-.98 of AS 2201, An Audit of Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements, andAppendix C, Special Reporting Situations, of AS 2201, for direction on reporting on
internal control over financial reporting. In addition, see AS 2201.86-.88, which includes
an illustrative combined audit report.
1

An audit, for purposes of this section, is defined as an examination of historicalfinancial statements performed in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB in effectat the time the audit is performed. In some cases, regulatory authorities may haveadditional requirements applicable to entities under their jurisdiction and auditors ofsuch entities should consider those requirements.
.02 This section does not apply to unaudited financial statements as described in AS
3320, Association with Financial Statements, nor does it apply to reports on incomplete
financial information or other special presentations as described in AS 3305, Special
Reports.
.03 Justification for the expression of the auditor's opinion rests on the conformity of hisor her audit with the standards of the PCAOB and on the findings. This section isconcerned primarily with the relationship of the requirements in paragraph .04 to thelanguage of the auditor's report.
.04 The report shall either contain an expression of opinion regarding the financial
statements, taken as a whole, or an assertion to the effect that an opinion cannot be

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-3

expressed. When an overall opinion cannot be expressed, the reasons therefor should
be stated. In all cases where an auditor's name is associated with financial statements,
the report should contain a clear-cut indication of the character of the auditor's work, ifany, and the degree of responsibility the auditor is taking.
.05 The objective of the requirements in paragraph .04 is to prevent misinterpretation of
the degree of responsibility the auditor is assuming when his or her name is associatedwith financial statements. Reference in paragraph .04 to the financial statements "taken
as a whole" applies equally to a complete set of financial statements and to anindividual financial statement (for example, to a balance sheet) for one or more periods
presented. (Paragraph .65 discusses the requirements in paragraph .04 as it applies tocomparative financial statements.) The auditor may express an unqualified opinion on
one of the financial statements and express a qualified or adverse opinion or disclaim
an opinion on another if the circumstances warrant.
.06 The auditor's report is customarily issued in connection with an entity's basic
financial statements—balance sheet, statement of income, statement of retained
earnings and statement of cash flows. Each financial statement audited should bespecifically identified in the introductory paragraph of the auditor's report. If the basic
financial statements include a separate statement of changes in stockholders' equity
accounts, it should be identified in the introductory paragraph of the report but need not
be reported on separately in the opinion paragraph since such changes are part of thepresentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Auditor's Standard Report.07 The auditor's standard report states that the financial statements present fairly, in allmaterial respects, an entity's financial position, results of operations, and cash flows inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles. This conclusion may be
expressed only when the auditor has formed such an opinion on the basis of an audit
performed in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
.08 The auditor's standard report identifies the financial statements audited in an
opening (introductory) paragraph, describes the nature of an audit in a scope
paragraph, and expresses the auditor's opinion in a separate opinion paragraph. The
basic elements of the report are the following:a.

A title that includes the word independent3

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-4
3This section does not require a title for an auditor's report if the auditor is notindependent. See AS 3320 for guidance on reporting when the auditor is notindependent.
b.

A statement that the financial statements identified in the report wereauditedc.

A statement that the financial statements are the responsibility of theCompany's management4 and that the auditor's responsibility is to express
an opinion on the financial statements based on his or her audit

4

In some instances, a document containing the auditor's report may include astatement by management regarding its responsibility for the presentation of thefinancial statements. Nevertheless, the auditor's report should state that the financial
statements are management's responsibility.
d.

A statement that the audit was conducted in accordance with thestandards of the PCAOB and an identification of the United States ofAmerica as the country of origin of those standards (for example, thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates))e.

A statement that those standards require that the auditor plan and performthe audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatementf.

A statement that an audit includes
(1)
(2)
(3)

Examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements
Assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management
Evaluating the overall financial statement presentation55

Paragraphs .03 and .04 of AS 2815, The Meaning of "Present Fairly in Conformity with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles," discuss the auditor's evaluation of theoverall presentation of the financial statements.
g.

A statement that the auditor believes that his or her audit provides areasonable basis for his or her opinionPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-5

6Ah.

An opinion as to whether the financial statements present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of the Company as of the balance
sheet date and the results of its operations and its cash flows for theperiod then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. The opinion should include an identification of the United Statesof America as the country of origin of those accounting principles (forexample, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica or U.S. generally accepted accounting principles)i.

The manual or printed signature of the auditor's firmj.

The city and state (or city and country, in the case of non-U.S. auditors)
from which the auditor's report has been issued6A

See SEC Rule 2-02(a) of Regulation S-X, 17 C.F.R. § 210.2-02(a).
k.

The date7 of the audit report7

For guidance on dating the auditor's report, see AS 3110, Dating of the Independent
Auditor's Report.
The form of the auditor's standard report on financial statements covering a single year
is as follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of X Company as ofDecember 31, 20XX, and the related statements of income, retained earnings,
and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that weplan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether thefinancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-6

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of X Company as of [at] December 31,
20XX, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United Statesof America.
[Signature][City and State or Country][Date]
The form of the auditor's standard report on comparative financial statements8 is asfollows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company as ofDecember 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing theaccounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of X Company as of [at] December 31,
20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
[Signature][City and State or Country]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-7[Date]
8

If statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows are presented on acomparative basis for one or more prior periods, but the balance sheet(s) as of the endof one (or more) of the prior period(s) is not presented, the phrase "for the years thenended" should be changed to indicate that the auditor's opinion applies to each period
for which statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows are presented, suchas "for each of the three years in the period ended [date of latest balance sheet]."l.

When performing an integrated audit of financial statements and internal
control over financial reporting, if the auditor issues separate reports on
the company's financial statements and on internal control over financial
reporting, the following paragraph should be added to the auditor's reporton the company's financial statements:
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), theeffectiveness of X Company's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 20X3, based on [identify control
criteria] and our report dated [date of report, which should be thesame as the date of the report on the financial statements]
expressed [include nature of opinions].

.09 The report may be addressed to the company whose financial statements are being
audited or to its board of directors or stockholders. A report on the financial statementsof an unincorporated entity should be addressed as circumstances dictate, for example,
to the partners, to the general partner, or to the proprietor. Occasionally, an auditor isretained to audit the financial statements of a company that is not a client; in such acase, the report is customarily addressed to the client and not to the directors or
stockholders of the company whose financial statements are being audited.
.010 The auditor's report contains either an expression of opinion on the financial
statements, taken as a whole,1 or an assertion that an opinion cannot be expressed.
This standard section also discusses the circumstances that may require the auditor to
depart from the standard auditor's unqualified report2 and provides reporting guidance inthe following circumstances: This section is organized by type of opinion that the auditor
may express in each of the various circumstances presented; this section describes
what is meant by the various audit opinions:

Unqualified opinion. An unqualified opinion states that the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position,PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-8

results of operations, and cash flows of the entity in conformity withgenerally accepted accounting principles. This is the opinion expressed in
the standard report discussed in paragraph .08.


Explanatory language added to the auditor's standard report. Certain
circumstances, while not affecting the auditor's unqualified opinion on thefinancial statements, may require that the auditor add an explanatory
paragraph (or other explanatory language) to his or her report.



Qualified opinion. A qualified opinion states that, except for the effects ofthe matter(s) to which the qualification relates, the financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the entity in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. See paragraphs .02 -.39.

Adverse opinion. An adverse opinion states that the financial statements
do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, or cash
flows of the entity in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. See paragraphs .40 -.43.

Disclaimer of opinion. A disclaimer of opinion states that the auditor does
not express an opinion on the financial statements. See paragraphs .44 .47.

These opinions are discussed in greater detail throughout the remainder of this section.
This standard also discusses other reporting circumstances, such as reports oncomparative financial statements.
1"Taken as a whole" applies equally to a complete set of financial statements and to anindividual financial statement with appropriate disclosures.
2

AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor
Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, establishes requirements for the auditor regarding
the content of the auditor's written report when the auditor expresses an unqualified
opinion on the financial statements (the "auditor's unqualified report"), including when
explanatory language is added. Paragraphs .85–.98 of AS 2201, An Audit of Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial
Statements, and Appendix C, Special Reporting Situations, of AS 2201 address theform and content of the auditor's report when the auditor performs an audit of internal
control over financial reporting. See also AS 2201.87, which includes an illustrative
combined audit report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-9

Explanatory Language Added to the Auditor's Standard Report.11 Certain circumstances, while not affecting the auditor's unqualified opinion, may
require that the auditor add an explanatory9 paragraph (or other explanatory language)
to the standard report.10 These circumstances include:
9

Unless otherwise required by the provisions of this section, an explanatory paragraphmay precede or follow the opinion paragraph in the auditor's report.
10

See footnote 3.
a.

The auditor's opinion is based in part on the report of another auditor(paragraphs .12 and .13).

b.

There is substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
concern.11

11

AS 2415, Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,
describes the auditor's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of timeand, when applicable, to consider the adequacy of financial statement disclosure and toinclude an explanatory paragraph in the report to reflect his or her conclusions.
c.

There has been a material change between periods in accounting
principles or in the method of their application (paragraphs .17A through.17E).

d.

A material misstatement in previously issued financial statements has
been corrected (paragraphs .18A through .18C).

e.

Certain circumstances relating to reports on comparative financial
statements exist (paragraphs .68, .69, and .72 through .74).

f.

Selected quarterly financial data required by SEC Regulation S-K has
been omitted or has not been reviewed. (See paragraph .50 of AS 4105,
Reviews of Interim Financial Information.)g.

Supplementary information required by the Financial AccountingStandards Board (FASB), the Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB), or the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB)
has been omitted, the presentation of such information departs materiallyfrom FASB, GASB, or FASAB guidelines, the auditor is unable toPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-10

complete prescribed procedures with respect to such information, or theauditor is unable to remove substantial doubts about whether the
supplementary information conforms to FASB, GASB, or FASAB
guidelines. (See paragraph .02 of AS 2705, Required Supplementary
Information.)h.

Other information in a document containing audited financial statements ismaterially inconsistent with information appearing in the financial
statements. (See paragraph .04 of AS 2710, Other Information inDocuments Containing Audited Financial Statements.)

In addition, the auditor may add an explanatory paragraph to emphasize a matter
regarding the financial statements (paragraph .19).
Opinion Based in Part on Report of Another Auditor.12 When the auditor decides to make reference to the report of another auditor as abasis, in part, for his or her opinion, he or she should disclose this fact in the
introductory paragraph of his or her report and should refer to the report of the otherauditor in expressing his or her opinion. These references indicate division of
responsibility for performance of the audit. (See AS 1205, Part of the Audit Performed
by Other Independent Auditors.).13 An example of a report indicating a division of responsibility follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ABC Company andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related consolidated
statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the years thenended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We did not audit the financial statements of B
Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets of$_______ and $________ as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, respectively, andtotal revenues of $_______ and $_______ for the years then ended. Thosestatements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished tous, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for B Company,
is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-11

that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing theaccounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, theconsolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of ABC Company and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
[.14-.15] [Paragraphs deleted.]
Lack of Consistency.16 The auditor should recognize the following matters relating to the consistency of thecompany's financial statements in the auditor's report if those matters have a material
effect on the financial statements:a.

A change in accounting principle.

b.

An adjustment to correct a misstatement in previously issued financial
statements.

Change in Accounting Principle.17A As discussed in AS 2820, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements, theauditor should evaluate a change in accounting principle to determine whether (1) the
newly adopted accounting principle is a generally accepted accounting principle, (2) the
method of accounting for the effect of the change is in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, (3) the disclosures related to the accounting change are
adequate, and (4) the company has justified that the alternative accounting principle ispreferable.12 A change in accounting principle that has a material effect on the financial
statements should be recognized in the auditor's report on the audited financial
statements through the addition of an explanatory paragraph following the opinion
paragraph. If the auditor concludes that the criteria in this paragraph have been met, thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-12

explanatory paragraph in the auditor's report should include identification of the natureof the change and a reference to the note disclosure describing the change.
12

The issuance of an accounting pronouncement that requires use of a new accounting
principle, interprets an existing principle, expresses a preference for an accounting
principle, or rejects a specific principle is sufficient justification for a change inaccounting principle, as long as the change in accounting principle is made inaccordance with the hierarchy of generally accepted accounting principles. See FASBStatement 154, paragraph 14.
.17B Following is an example of an explanatory paragraph for a change in accounting
principle resulting from the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement:
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the company has changed its
method of accounting for [describe accounting method change] in [year(s) offinancial statements that reflect the accounting method change] due to theadoption of [name of accounting pronouncement].
.17C Following is an example of an explanatory paragraph when the company has
made a change in accounting principle other than a change due to the adoption of a
new accounting pronouncement:
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the company has elected tochange its method of accounting for [describe accounting method change] in[year(s) of financial statements that reflect the accounting method change].
.17D The explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting principle should be
included in reports on financial statements in the year of the change and in subsequent
years until the new accounting principle is applied in all periods presented. If theaccounting change is accounted for by retrospective application to the financial
statements of all prior periods presented, the additional paragraph is needed only in theyear of the change.
.17E If the auditor concludes that the criteria in paragraph .17A for a change inaccounting principle are not met, the auditor should consider the matter to be a
departure from generally accepted accounting principles and, if the effect of the changein accounting principle is material, issue a qualified or adverse opinion.
Correction of a Material Misstatement in Previously Issued Financial Statements.18A Correction of a material misstatement in previously issued financial statements
should be recognized in the auditor's report through the addition of an explanatory

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-13
paragraph following the opinion paragraph.13 The explanatory paragraph should include(1) a statement that the previously issued financial statements have been restated forthe correction of a misstatement in the respective period and (2) a reference to thecompany's disclosure of the correction of the misstatement. Following is an example ofan appropriate explanatory paragraph when there has been a correction of a material
misstatement in previously issued financial statements.
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the 20X2 financial statements
have been restated to correct a misstatement.
13

The directions in paragraphs .68-.69 apply when comparative financial statements arepresented and the opinion on the prior-period financial statements differs from theopinion previously expressed.
.18B This type of explanatory paragraph in the auditor's report should be included inreports on financial statements when the related financial statements are restated tocorrect the prior material misstatement. The paragraph need not be repeated insubsequent years.
.18C The accounting pronouncements generally require certain disclosures relating torestatements to correct a misstatement in previously issued financial statements. If thefinancial statement disclosures are not adequate, the auditor should address the lack ofdisclosure as discussed beginning at paragraph .41.
Emphasis of a Matter.19 In any report on financial statements, the auditor may emphasize a matter regarding
the financial statements. Such explanatory information should be presented in a
separate paragraph of the auditor's report. Phrases such as "with the foregoing[following] explanation" should not be used in the opinion paragraph if an emphasis
paragraph is included in the auditor's report. Emphasis paragraphs are never required;
they may be added solely at the auditor's discretion. Examples of matters the auditor
may wish to emphasize areThat the entity is a component of a larger business enterprise.
That the entity has had significant transactions with related parties.
Unusually important subsequent events.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-14

Accounting matters, other than those involving a change or changes inaccounting principles, affecting the comparability of the financial statements withthose of the preceding period.

Departures From Unqualified Opinions
Qualified Opinions.020 Certain circumstances may require a qualified opinion. A qualified opinion states
that, except for the effects of the matter to which the qualification relates, the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, financial position, results ofoperations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Such an opinion is expressed when—a.

There is a lack of sufficient appropriate evidential matter or there are
restrictions on the scope of the audit that have led the auditor to conclude
that he or she cannot express an unqualified opinion and he or she has
concluded not to disclaim an opinion (paragraphs .0522–.1734).

b.

The auditor believes, on the basis of his or her audit, that the financial
statements contain a departure from generally accepted accounting
principles, the effect of which is material, and he or she has concluded not
to express an adverse opinion (paragraphs .1835–.3957).

.03 When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion, the auditor's report must include thesame basic elements and communication of critical audit matters, if requirements ofcritical audit matters apply, as would be required in an unqualified auditor's report underAS 3101.
.0421 When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion, he or she should disclose all of
the substantive reasons for the qualified opinion in one or more separate explanatory
paragraph(s) preceding immediately following the opinion paragraph of the auditor'sreport. The auditor should also include, in the opinion paragraph, the appropriatequalifying language and a reference to the explanatory paragraph that discloses all of
the substantive reasons for the qualified opinion. A qualified opinion should include theword except or exception in a phrase such as except for or with the exception of.
Phrases such as subject to and with the foregoing explanation are not clear or forcefulenough and should not be used. Since accompanying notes are part of the financial
statements, wording such as fairly presented, in all material respects, when read in
conjunction with Note 1 is likely to be misunderstood and should not be used.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-15

Note: The auditor should refer to AS 3101 to determine if the matter for which theauditor qualified the opinion is also a critical audit matter.
Scope Limitations.0522 The auditor can determine that he or she is able to express an unqualified opinion
only if the audit has been conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB
and if he or she has therefore been able to apply all the procedures he considers
necessary in the circumstances. Restrictions on the scope of the audit, whether
imposed by the client or by circumstances, such as the timing of his or her work, theinability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidential matter, or an inadequacy in theaccounting records, may require the auditor to qualify his or her opinion or to disclaim
an opinion. In such instances, the reasons for the auditor's qualification of opinion or
disclaimer of opinion should be described in the report.
.0623 The auditor's decision to qualify his or her opinion or disclaim an opinion becauseof a scope limitation depends on his or her assessment of the importance of the omitted
procedure(s) to his or her ability to form an opinion on the financial statements being
audited. This assessment will be affected by the nature and magnitude of the potential
effects of the matters in question and by their significance to the financial statements. If
the potential effects relate to many financial statement items, this significance is likely to
be greater than if only a limited number of items is involved.
.0724 Common restrictions on the scope of the audit include those applying to theobservation of physical inventories and the confirmation of accounts receivable by directcommunication with debtors.314 Another common scope restriction involves accounting
for long-term investments when the auditor has not been able to obtain audited financial
statements of an investee. Restrictions on the application of these or other audit
procedures to important elements of the financial statements require the auditor todecide whether he or she has examined sufficient appropriate evidential matter topermit him or her to express an unqualified or qualified opinion, or whether he or sheshould disclaim an opinion. When restrictions that significantly limit the scope of theaudit are imposed by the client, ordinarily the auditor should disclaim an opinion on thefinancial statements.
314

Circumstances such as the timing of the work may make it impossible for the auditor
to accomplish these procedures. In this case, if the auditor is able to satisfy himself or
herself as to inventories or accounts receivable by applying alternative procedures,
there is no significant limitation on the scope of the work, and the report need notinclude a reference to the omission of the procedures or the use of alternative
procedures. It is important to understand, however, that AS 2510, Auditing Inventories,

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-16

states that "it will always be necessary for the auditor to make, or observe, somephysical counts of the inventory and apply appropriate tests of intervening transactions.".0825 When a qualified opinion results from a limitation on the scope of the audit or an
insufficiency of evidential matter, the situation auditor's report should be described thebasis for departure from an unqualified opinion in an explanatory separate paragraphpreceding immediately following the opinion paragraph and referred to that description
in both the scope Basis for Opinion section and opinion paragraphs of the auditor'sreport. It is not appropriate for the scope of the audit to be explained in a note to thefinancial statements, since the description of the audit scope is the responsibility of theauditor and not that of the client.
.0926 When an auditor qualifies his or her opinion because of a scope limitation, thewording in the opinion paragraph should indicate that the qualification pertains to thepossible effects on the financial statements and not to the scope limitation itself.
Wording such as "In our opinion, except for the above-mentioned limitation on the scopeof our audit . . ." bases the exception on the restriction itself, rather than on the possible
effects on the financial statements and, therefore, is unacceptable. An example of aqualified opinion related to a scope limitation concerning an investment in a foreign
affiliate (assuming the effects of the limitation are such that the auditor has concluded
that a disclaimer of opinion is not appropriate) follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company[Same first paragraph as the standard report]
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, except for the effects of such the adjustments, if any, as might havebeen determined to be necessary had we been able to examine evidence
regarding the foreign affiliate investment and earnings, as described below, thefinancial statements referred to in the first paragraph above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of X the Company as of December 31,
20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-17

then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We were unable to obtain audited financial statements supporting the Company's
investment in a foreign affiliate stated at $_______ and $_______ at December
31, 20X2 and 20X1, respectively, or its equity in earnings of that affiliate of$_______ and $_______, which is included in net income for the years thenended as described in Note X to the financial statements; nor were we able tosatisfy ourselves as to the carrying value of the investment in the foreign affiliate
or the equity in its earnings by other auditing procedures.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Except as discussed in the following paragraph above, we conducted our auditsin accordance with the standards of the PCAOB Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respond to those risks. An audit Such procedures
includeds examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An Our audits also includesd
assessing evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of thefinancial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-18

We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date].1027 Other scope limitations. Sometimes, notes to financial statements may contain
unaudited information, such as pro forma calculations or other similar disclosures. If theunaudited information (for example, an investor's share, material in amount, of aninvestee's earnings recognized on the equity method) is such that it should be subjected
to auditing procedures in order for the auditor to form an opinion with respect to thefinancial statements taken as a whole, the auditor should apply the procedures he or
she deems necessary to the unaudited information. If the auditor has not been able toapply the procedures he or she considers necessary, the auditor should qualify his or
her opinion or disclaim an opinion because of a limitation on the scope of the audit.
.1128 If, however, these disclosures are not necessary to fairly present the financial
position, operating results, or cash flows on which the auditor is reporting, suchdisclosures may be identified as unaudited or as not covered by the auditor's report. For
example, the pro forma effects of a business combination or of a subsequent event may
be labelled unaudited. Therefore, while the event or transaction giving rise to thedisclosures in these circumstances should be audited, the pro forma disclosures of thatevent or transaction would not be. The auditor should be aware, however, that AS 3110,
Dating of the Independent Auditor's Report, states that, if the auditor is aware of amaterial subsequent event that has occurred after the completion of fieldwork but before
issuance of the report that should be disclosed, the auditor's only options are to dual
date the report or date the report as of the date of the subsequent event and extend theprocedures for review of subsequent events to that date. Labelling the note unaudited is
not an acceptable alternative in these circumstances.
.1229 Uncertainties and scope limitations. A matter involving an uncertainty is one
that is expected to be resolved at a future date, at which time conclusive evidential
matter concerning its outcome would be expected to become available. Uncertainties
include, but are not limited to, contingencies covered by Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting forContingencies, and matters related to estimates covered by Statement of Position 94-6,
Disclosure of Certain Significant Risks and Uncertainties.
.1330 Conclusive evidential matter concerning the ultimate outcome of uncertainties
cannot be expected to exist at the time of the audit because the outcome and related
evidential matter are prospective. In these circumstances, management is responsible

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-19

for estimating the effect of future events on the financial statements, or determining thata reasonable estimate cannot be made and making the required disclosures, all inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles, based on management's
analysis of existing conditions. An audit includes an assessment of whether theevidential matter is sufficient to support management's analysis. Absence of theexistence of information related to the outcome of an uncertainty does not necessarily
lead to a conclusion that the evidential matter supporting management's assertion is not
sufficient. Rather, the auditor's judgment regarding the sufficiency of the evidential
matter is based on the evidential matter that is, or should be, available. If, after
considering the existing conditions and available evidence, the auditor concludes thatsufficient evidential matter supports management's assertions about the nature of amatter involving an uncertainty and its presentation or disclosure in the financial
statements, an unqualified opinion ordinarily is appropriate.
.1431 If the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient evidential matter to support
management's assertions about the nature of a matter involving an uncertainty and its
presentation or disclosure in the financial statements, the auditor should consider theneed to express a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion because of a scope
limitation. A qualification or disclaimer of opinion because of a scope limitation isappropriate if sufficient evidential matter related to an uncertainty does or did exist but
was not available to the auditor for reasons such as management's record retention
policies or a restriction imposed by management.
.1532 Scope limitations related to uncertainties should be differentiated from situations
in which the auditor concludes that the financial statements are materially misstated due
to departures from generally accepted accounting principles related to uncertainties.
Such departures may be caused by inadequate disclosure concerning the uncertainty,
the use of inappropriate accounting principles, or the use of unreasonable accounting
estimates. Paragraphs .2845 to .3249 provide guidance to the auditor when financial
statements contain departures from generally accepted accounting principles related to
uncertainties.
.1633 Limited reporting engagements. The auditor may be asked to report on one
basic financial statement and not on the others. For example, he or she may be asked
to report on the balance sheet and not on the statements of income, retained earnings
or cash flows. These engagements do not involve scope limitations if the auditor'saccess to information underlying the basic financial statements is not limited and if theauditor applies all the procedures he considers necessary in the circumstances; rather,such engagements involve limited reporting objectives.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-20.1734 An auditor may be asked to report on the balance sheet only. In this case, theauditor may express an opinion on the balance sheet only. An example of an
unqualified opinion on a balance-sheet-only audit follows (the report assumes that theauditor has been able to satisfy himself or herself regarding the consistency of
application of accounting principles):Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statement
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20XX, and the related notes [and schedules](collectively referred to as the "financial statement"). In our opinion, the balance
sheet referred to above the financial statement presents fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of X the Company as of December 31, 20XX, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica.
Basis for Opinion
This financial statement is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our
audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities andExchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the balance sheet financial statement is free of material misstatement,
whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures toassess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statement, whether due
to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. An audit
Such procedures includeds examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet financial statement.
An Our audit also includes included assessing the accounting principles usedand significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-21

balance sheet presentation of the financial statement. We believe that our auditof the balance sheet financial statement provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
Departure From a Generally Accepted Accounting Principle.1835 When financial statements are materially affected by a departure from generally
accepted accounting principles and the auditor has audited the statements inaccordance with the standards of the PCAOB, he or she should express a qualified(paragraphs .1936 through .3957) or an adverse (paragraphs .4058 through .4360)
opinion. The basis for such opinion should be stated in the report.
.1936 In deciding whether the effects of a departure from generally accepted accounting
principles are sufficiently material to require either a qualified or adverse opinion, one
factor to be considered is the dollar magnitude of such effects. However, the concept ofmateriality does not depend entirely on relative size; it involves qualitative as well as
quantitative judgments. The significance of an item to a particular entity (for example,
inventories to a manufacturing company), the pervasiveness of the misstatement (suchas whether it affects the amounts and presentation of numerous financial statement
items), and the effect of the misstatement on the financial statements taken as a whole
are all factors to be considered in making a judgment regarding materiality.
.2037 When the auditor expresses a qualified opinion, he or she should disclose, in a
separate explanatory paragraph(s) preceding immediately following the opinion
paragraph of the report, all of the substantive reasons that have led him or her toconclude that there has been a departure from generally accepted accounting
principles. Furthermore, the opinion paragraph of the report should include theappropriate qualifying language and a reference to the explanatory paragraph(s) that
describe the substantive reasons for the qualified opinion.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-22.2138 The explanatory paragraph(s) immediately following the opinion paragraph that
describe the substantive reasons that led the auditor to conclude that there has been adeparture from generally accepted accounting principles should also disclose theprincipal effects of the subject matter of the qualification on financial position, results ofoperations, and cash flows, if practicable.415 If the effects are not reasonably
determinable, the report should so state. If such disclosures are made in a note to thefinancial statements, the explanatory paragraph(s) that describe the substantive
reasons for the qualified opinion may be shortened by referring to it.
415

In this context, practicable means that the information is reasonably obtainable frommanagement's accounts and records and that providing the information in the report
does not require the auditor to assume the position of a preparer of financial
information. For example, if the information can be obtained from the accounts andrecords without the auditor substantially increasing the effort that would normally berequired to complete the audit, the information should be presented in the report.
.2239 An example of a report in which the opinion is qualified because of the use of an
accounting principle at variance with generally accepted accounting principles follows(assuming the effects are such that the auditor has concluded that an adverse opinion is
not appropriate):
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, except for the effects of not capitalizing certain lease obligations as
discussed in the preceding following paragraph, the financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of X theCompany as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company has excluded, from property and debt in the accompanying
balance sheets, certain lease obligations that, in our opinion, should be

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-23

capitalized in order to conform with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. If these lease obligations were capitalized, property
would be increased by $_______ and $_______, long-term debt by $_______
and $_______, and retained earnings by $_______ and $_______ as ofDecember 31, 20X2 and 20X1, respectively. Additionally, net income would be
increased (decreased) by $_______ and $_______ and earnings per share
would be increased (decreased) by $_______ and $_______, respectively, forthe years then ended.
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date].2340 If the pertinent facts are disclosed in a note to the financial statements, aseparate paragraph (preceding immediately following the opinion paragraph) of theauditor's report in the circumstances illustrated in paragraph .2239 might read as
follows:
As more fully described in Note X to the financial statements, the Company has
excluded certain lease obligations from property and debt in the accompanying
balance sheets. In our opinion, accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America require that such obligations be included in the balance
sheets.
.2441 Inadequate disclosure. Information essential for a fair presentation in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles should be set forth in the financial
statements (which include the related notes). When such information is set forthelsewhere in a report to shareholders, or in a prospectus, proxy statement, or othersimilar report, it should be referred to in the financial statements. If the financial

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-24

statements, including accompanying notes, fail to disclose information that is requiredby generally accepted accounting principles, the auditor should express a qualified or
adverse opinion because of the departure from those principles and should provide theinformation in the report, if practicable,516 unless its omission from the auditor's report isrecognized as appropriate by a specific PCAOB standard.
516

See footnote 415.

.2542 Following is an example of a report qualified for inadequate disclosure (assuming
the effects are such that the auditor has concluded an adverse opinion is not
appropriate):
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, except for the omission of the information discussed in the preceding
following paragraph, . . .
The Company's financial statements do not disclose [describe the nature of theomitted disclosures]. In our opinion, disclosure of this information is required byaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-25[City and State or Country][Date].2643 If a company issues financial statements that purport to present financial position
and results of operations but omits the related statement of cash flows, the auditor will
normally conclude that the omission requires qualification of his opinion.
.2744 The auditor is not required to prepare a basic financial statement (for example, astatement of cash flows for one or more periods) and include it in the report iIf thecompany's management declines to present the statement a basic financial statement(for example, a statement of cash flows for one or more periods). Accordingly, in thesecases, the auditor should ordinarily qualify the report in the following manner:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements ofoperations and stockholders' equity for each of the years then ended, and therelated notes [and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial
statements").income and retained earnings for the years then ended. In our
opinion, except that the omission of a statement of cash flows results in an
incomplete presentation as explained in the preceding following paragraph, thefinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, thefinancial position of X the Company as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and theresults of its operations for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company declined to present a statement of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 20X2 and 20X1. Presentation of such statement summarizing theCompany's operating, investing, and financing activities is required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion[Same second paragraph as the standard report Same basic elements as theBasis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-26

Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date].2845 Departures from generally accepted accounting principles involving risks
or uncertainties, and materiality considerations. Departures from generally accepted
accounting principles involving risks or uncertainties generally fall into one of thefollowing categories:

Inadequate disclosure (paragraphs .2946 and .3047)



Inappropriate accounting principles (paragraph .3148)

Unreasonable accounting estimates (paragraph .3249).2946 If the auditor concludes that a matter involving a risk or an uncertainty is notadequately disclosed in the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles, the auditor should express a qualified or an adverse opinion.
.3047 The auditor should consider materiality in evaluating the adequacy of disclosureof matters involving risks or uncertainties in the financial statements in the context of thefinancial statements taken as a whole. The auditor's consideration of materiality is amatter of professional judgment and is influenced by his or her perception of the needsof a reasonable person who will rely on the financial statements. Materiality judgments
involving risks or uncertainties are made in light of the surrounding circumstances. The
auditor evaluates the materiality of reasonably possible losses that may be incurred
upon the resolution of uncertainties both individually and in the aggregate. The auditor
performs the evaluation of reasonably possible losses without regard to his or her
evaluation of the materiality of known and likely misstatements in the financial
statements.
.3148 In preparing financial statements, management estimates the outcome of certain
types of future events. For example, estimates ordinarily are made about the usefulPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-27

lives of depreciable assets, the collectibility of accounts receivable, the realizable valueof inventory items, and the provision for product warranties. FASB Statement No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, paragraphs 23 and 25, describes situations in which theinability to make a reasonable estimate may raise questions about the appropriatenessof the accounting principles used. If, in those or other situations, the auditor concludes
that the accounting principles used cause the financial statements to be materially
misstated, he or she should express a qualified or an adverse opinion.
.3249 Usually, the auditor is able to satisfy himself or herself regarding thereasonableness of management's estimate of the effects of future events by consideringvarious types of evidential matter, including the historical experience of the entity. If theauditor concludes that management's estimate is unreasonable (see paragraph .13 of
AS 2810, Evaluating Audit Results) and that its effect is to cause the financial
statements to be materially misstated, he or she should express a qualified or anadverse opinion.
[.50].3351 Departures from generally accepted accounting principles related tochanges in accounting principle. Paragraph .07 .17A of AS 2820, Evaluating
Consistency of Financial Statements, states includes the criteria for evaluating a changein accounting principle. If the auditor concludes that the criteria have not been met, heor she should consider that circumstance to be a departure from generally accepted
accounting principles and, if the effect of the accounting change is material, should
issue a qualified or adverse opinion.
.3452 The accounting standards indicate that a company may make a change inaccounting principle only if it justifies that the allowable alternative accounting principle
is preferable. If the company does not provide reasonable justification that thealternative accounting principle is preferable, the auditor should consider the accountingchange to be a departure from generally accepted accounting principles and, if theeffect of the change in accounting principle is material, should issue a qualified or
adverse opinion. The following is an example of a report qualified because a company
did not provide reasonable justification that an alternative accounting principle ispreferable:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-28

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, except for the change in accounting principle discussed in the preceding
following paragraph, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, inall material respects, the financial position of X the Company as of December 31,
20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years
then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As disclosed in Note X to the financial statements, the Company adopted, in
20X2, the first-in, first-out method of accounting for its inventories, whereas itpreviously used the last-in, first-out method. Although use of the first-in, first-out
method is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, in our opinion the Company has not provided
reasonable justification that this accounting principle is preferable as required bythose principles.617
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
617

Because this paragraph included in the example presented contains all of theinformation required in an explanatory separate paragraph on consistency, an separate
explanatory paragraph (immediately following the opinion paragraph) as required byparagraphs .17A thorough .17E of this section AS 2820.08 and .12-.15 is not necessary
in this instance. A separate paragraph that identifies the change in accounting principlePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-29

would be required if the substance of the disclosure did not fulfill the requirements
outlined in these paragraphs.
.3553 Whenever an accounting change results in an auditor expressing a qualified or
adverse opinion on the conformity of financial statements with generally accepted
accounting principles for the year of change, the auditor should consider the possible
effects of that change when reporting on the entity's financial statements for subsequent
years, as discussed in paragraphs .3654 through .3957.
.3654 If the financial statements for the year of such change are presented and reported
on with a subsequent year's financial statements, the auditor's report should disclose
his or her reservations with respect to the statements for the year of change.
.3755 If an entity has adopted an accounting principle that is not a generally accepted
accounting principle, its continued use might have a material effect on the statements ofa subsequent year on which the auditor is reporting. In this situation, the independent
auditor should express either a qualified opinion or an adverse opinion, depending on
the materiality of the departure in relation to the statements of the subsequent year.
.3856 If an entity accounts for the effect of a change prospectively when generally
accepted accounting principles require restatement or the inclusion of the cumulative
effect of the change in the year of change, a subsequent year's financial statements
could improperly include a charge or credit that is material to those statements. Thissituation also requires that the auditor express a qualified or an adverse opinion.
.3957 If the auditor issues a qualified or adverse opinion because the company has notjustified that an allowable accounting principle adopted in an accounting change ispreferable, as described in paragraph .3452, the auditor should continue to express that
opinion on the financial statements for the year of change as long as those financial
statements are presented and reported on. However, the auditor's qualified or adverse
opinion relates only to the accounting change and does not affect the status of a newly
adopted principle as a generally accepted accounting principle. Accordingly, while
expressing a qualified or adverse opinion for the year of change, the independent
auditor's opinion regarding the subsequent years' statements need not express aqualified or adverse opinion on the use of the newly adopted principle in subsequent
periods.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-30

Adverse Opinions.40 When the auditor expresses an adverse opinion, the auditor's report must include
the opinion as described in paragraph .41 and the same other basic elements as would
be required in an unqualified auditor's report under AS 3101, modified appropriately.
Note: The requirements as to critical audit matters described in AS 3101 do not
apply when the auditor expresses an adverse opinion.
.4158 An adverse opinion states that the financial statements do not present fairly thefinancial position or the results of operations or cash flows in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Such an opinion is expressed when, in the auditor's
judgment, the financial statements taken as a whole are not presented fairly in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
.4259 When the auditor expresses an adverse opinion, he or she should disclose in a
separate explanatory paragraph(s) preceding immediately following the opinion
paragraph of the report (a) all the substantive reasons for his or her adverse opinion,and (b) the principal effects of the subject matter of the adverse opinion on financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows, if practicable.718 If the effects are notreasonably determinable, the report should so state.819
718

See footnote 415.

819

When the auditor expresses an adverse opinion, he or she should also consider theneed for an explanatory paragraph under the circumstances identified in paragraph 11,
subsection (b), (c), (d), and (e) of AS 3101.18 this section.
.4360 When an adverse opinion is expressed, the opinion paragraph should include a
direct reference to a separate paragraph that discloses the basis for the adverse
opinion., An example of this is as shown below:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-31[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, because of the effects of the matters discussed in the preceding
following paragraphs, the financial statements referred to above do not present
fairly, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America, the financial position of X the Company as of December 31,
20X2 and 20X1, or the results of its operations or its cash flows for the years
then ended.
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the Company carries its
property, plant and equipment accounts at appraisal values, and provides
depreciation on the basis of such values. Further, the Company does not provide
for income taxes with respect to differences between financial income andtaxable income arising because of the use, for income tax purposes, of theinstallment method of reporting gross profit from certain types of sales.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requirethat property, plant and equipment be stated at an amount not in excess of cost,
reduced by depreciation based on such amount, and that deferred income taxes
be provided.
Because of the departures from accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America identified above, as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1,
inventories have been increased $_______ and $_______ by inclusion in
manufacturing overhead of depreciation in excess of that based on cost;
property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation, is carried at$_______ and $_______ in excess of an amount based on the cost to theCompany; and deferred income taxes of $_______ and $_______ have not beenrecorded; resulting in an increase of $_______ and $_______ in retained
earnings and in appraisal surplus of $_______ and $_______, respectively. For
the years ended December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, cost of goods sold has been
increased $_______ and $_______, respectively, because of the effects of thedepreciation accounting referred to above and deferred income taxes of$_______ and $_______ have not been provided, resulting in an increase in net
income of $_______ and $_______, respectively.
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101][Signature]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-32

We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
Disclaimer of Opinion.4461 A disclaimer of opinion states that the auditor does not express an opinion on thefinancial statements. An auditor may decline to express an opinion whenever he or she
is unable to form or has not formed an opinion as to the fairness of presentation of thefinancial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. If theauditor disclaims an opinion, the auditor's report should give all of the substantive
reasons for the disclaimer.
.4562 A disclaimer is appropriate when the auditor has not performed an audit sufficientin scope to enable him or her to form an opinion on the financial statements.209 A
disclaimer of opinion should not be expressed because the auditor believes, on thebasis of his or her audit, that there are material departures from generally accepted
accounting principles (see paragraphs .1835 through .3957). When disclaiming an
opinion because of a scope limitation, the auditor should state in a separate paragraphor paragraphs all of the substantive reasons for the disclaimer. He or she should statethat the scope of the audit was not sufficient to warrant the expression of an opinion.
The auditor should not identify the procedures that were performed nor include theparagraph describing the characteristics of an audit (that is, the scope paragraph of theauditor's standard report); to do so may tend to overshadow the disclaimer. In addition,
the auditor should also disclose any other reservations he or she has regarding fairpresentation in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
209

AS 3320.05 provides guidance to an accountant who is associated with the financial
statements of a public entity, but has not audited such statements.
.46 When the auditor disclaims an opinion, the auditor's report must include the basic
elements as would be required in an unqualified auditor's report under AS 3101,
modified as follows:a. The first section of the auditor's report must include the section title "Disclaimer
of Opinion on the Financial Statements" and the following elements:(1) The name of the company whose financial statements the auditor was
engaged to audit;

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-33(2) A statement identifying each financial statement and any related schedule(s)that the auditor was engaged to audit;
b. The second section of the auditor's report must include the title "Basis forDisclaimer of Opinion."c. Elements in paragraphs .09b-f of AS 3101 should be omitted.
Note: The requirements as to critical audit matters described in AS 3101 do not
apply when the auditor disclaims an opinion.
.4763 An example of a report disclaiming an opinion resulting from an inability to obtainsufficient appropriate evidential matter because of the scope limitation follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Disclaimer of Opinion on the Financial Statements
We were engaged to audit the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements of[titles of the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income,stockholders' equity, and cash flows]income, retained earnings, and cash flows
for the years then ended, and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively
referred to as the "financial statements").1021 Since As described in the following
paragraph, because the Company did not take physical inventories and we were
not able to apply other auditing procedures to satisfy ourselves as to inventory
quantities and the cost of property and equipment, we were not able to obtainsufficient appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on thefinancial statements the scope of our work was not sufficient to enable us toexpress, and we do not express, an opinion on these financial statements.
The Company did not make a count of its physical inventory in 20X2 or 20X1,
stated in the accompanying financial statements at $_______ as of December
31, 20X2, and at $________ as of December 31, 20X1. Further, evidence
supporting the cost of property and equipment acquired prior to December 31,
20X1, is no longer available. The Company's records do not permit theapplication of other auditing procedures to inventories or property andequipment.
Basis for Disclaimer of OpinionPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-34

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent
with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws
and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
[Second paragraph of standard report should be omitted][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [ year ].
[City and State or Country][Date]
1021

The wording in the first paragraph of the auditor's standard report is changed in adisclaimer of opinion because of a scope limitation. The first sentence now states that
"we were engaged to audit" rather than "we have audited" since, because of the scope
limitation, the auditor was not able to perform an audit in accordance with the standardsof the PCAOB. In addition, the last sentence of the first paragraph is also deleted,because of the scope limitation, to eliminate the that references to the auditor's
responsibility to express an opinion is deleted.
Piecemeal Opinions.4864 Piecemeal opinions (expressions of opinion as to certain identified items infinancial statements) should not be expressed when the auditor has disclaimed an
opinion or has expressed an adverse opinion on the financial statements taken as awhole because piecemeal opinions tend to overshadow or contradict a disclaimer of
opinion or an adverse opinion.
Reports on Comparative Financial Statements.4965 The report shall Paragraph .04 requires that an auditor's report contain either
contain an expression of opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole oran assertion to the effect that an opinion cannot be expressed. Reference in paragraph.04 to the financial statements taken as a whole applies not only to the financial
statements of the current period but also to those of one or more prior periods that arepresented on a comparative basis with those of the current period. Therefore, acontinuing auditor1122 should update1223 the report on the individual financial statements

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-35

of the one or more prior periods presented on a comparative basis with those of thecurrent period.1324 Ordinarily, the auditor's report on comparative financial statements
should be dated as of the date of completion of fieldwork for the most recent audit. (SeeAS 3110.01.)
1122

A continuing auditor is one who has audited the financial statements of the current
period and of one or more consecutive periods immediately prior to the current period. If
one firm of independent auditors merges with another firm and the new firm becomesthe auditor of a former client of one of the former firms, the new firm may accept
responsibility and express an opinion on the financial statements for the prior period(s),as well as for those of the current period. In such circumstances, the new firm should
follow the guidance in paragraphs .4965 through .5369 and may indicate in its report orsignature that a merger took place and may name the firm of independent auditors thatwas merged with it. If the new firm decides not to express an opinion on the prior-period
financial statements, the guidance in paragraphs .5470 through .5874 should be
followed.
1223

An updated report on prior-period financial statements should be distinguished froma reissuance of a previous report (see AS 3110.06 through .08), since in issuing an
updated report the continuing auditor considers information that he or she has becomeaware of during his or her audit of the current-period financial statements (seeparagraph .5268) and because an updated report is issued in conjunction with theauditor's report on the current-period financial statements.
1324

A continuing auditor need not report on the prior-period financial statements if only
summarized comparative information of the prior period(s) is presented. For example,
entities such as state and local governmental units frequently present total-all-funds
information for the prior period(s) rather than information by individual funds because of
space limitations or to avoid cumbersome or confusing formats. Also, not-for-profit
organizations frequently present certain information for the prior period(s) in total rather
than by net asset class. In some circumstances, the client may request the auditor to
express an opinion on the prior period(s) as well as the current period. In thosecircumstances, the auditor should consider whether the information included for theprior period(s) contains sufficient detail to constitute a fair presentation in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. In most cases, this will necessitate
including additional columns or separate detail by fund or net asset class, or the auditor
would need to modify his or her report.
.5066 During the audit of the current-period financial statements, the auditor should be
alert for circumstances or events that affect the prior-period financial statements
presented (see paragraph .5268) or the adequacy of informative disclosures concerning

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-36

those statements. (See AS 2810.31.) In updating his or her report on the prior-period
financial statements, the auditor should consider the effects of any such circumstancesor events coming to his or her attention.
Different Reports on Comparative Financial Statements Presented.5167 Since the auditor's report on comparative financial statements applies to theindividual financial statements presented, an auditor may express a qualified or adverse
opinion, disclaim an opinion, or include an explanatory paragraph with respect to one ormore financial statements for one or more periods, while issuing a different report on theother financial statements presented. Following are examples of reports on comparative
financial statements (excluding the standard introductory and scope paragraphs, whereapplicable) with different reports on one or more financial statements presented.
Standard The Auditor's Unqualified Report on the Prior-Year Financial Statements
and a Qualified Opinion on the Current-Year Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ABC Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, except for the effects on the 20X2 financial statements of not capitalizing
certain lease obligations as described in the preceding following paragraph, thefinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, thefinancial position of ABC the Company as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, andthe results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica.
The Company has excluded, from property and debt in the accompanying 20X2
balance sheet, certain lease obligations that were entered into in 20X2 which, in
our opinion, should be capitalized in order to conform with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. If these lease obligations
were capitalized, property would be increased by $_______, long-term debt by$_______, and retained earnings by $_______ as of December 31, 20X2, andPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-37

net income and earnings per share would be increased (decreased) by$_______ and $_______, respectively, for the year then ended.
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
Standard The Auditor's Unqualified Report on the Current-Year Financial
Statements With a Disclaimer of Opinion on the Prior-Year Statements of Income,Retained Earnings, and Cash Flows
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ABC Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements of[titles of the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income,stockholders' equity, and cash flows] for the year ended December 31, 20X2, andthe related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial
statements"). In our opinion, the balance sheets of ABC the Company as ofDecember 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the related statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 20X2, present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of ABC the Company as ofDecember 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 20X2, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because of thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-38

matter discussed in the preceding following paragraph, the scope of our work
was not sufficient to enable us to express we were not able to obtain sufficientappropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion on the resultsof operations and cash flows, and we do not express, an opinion on the results ofoperations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 20X1.
We did not observe the taking of the physical inventory as of December 31,
20X0, since that date was prior to our appointment as auditors for the Company,
and we were unable to satisfy ourselves regarding inventory quantities by meansof other auditing procedures. Inventory amounts as of December 31, 20X0, enter
into the determination of net income and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 20X1.1425
Basis for Opinion [Same first paragraph as the standard report]
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
Except as explained in the following paragraph above, we conducted our auditsin accordance with the standards of the PCAOB Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan andperform our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respond to those risks. An audit Such procedures
includes included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting regarding theamounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An Our audits also includes
assessing included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentationof the financial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters]

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-39[Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [ year ].
[City and State or Country][Date]
1425

It is assumed that the independent auditor has been able to satisfy himself or herself
as to the consistency of application of generally accepted accounting principles. See AS
2820 for a discussion of consistency.
Opinion on Prior-Period Financial Statements Different From the Opinion
Previously Expressed.5268 If, during the current audit, an auditor becomes aware of circumstances or events
that affect the financial statements of a prior period, he or she should consider suchmatters when updating his or her report on the financial statements of the prior period.
For example, if an auditor has previously qualified his or her opinion or expressed anadverse opinion on financial statements of a prior period because of a departure fromgenerally accepted accounting principles, and the prior-period financial statements arerestated in the current period to conform with generally accepted accounting principles,
the auditor's updated report on the financial statements of the prior period should
indicate that the statements have been restated and should express an unqualified
opinion with respect to the restated financial statements.
.5369 If, in an updated report, the opinion is different from the opinion previously
expressed on the financial statements of a prior period, the auditor should disclose all
the substantive reasons for the different opinion in a separate explanatory paragraph(s)preceding immediately following the opinion paragraph of his or her report. The
explanatory paragraph(s) should disclose (a) the date of the auditor's previous report,(b) the type of opinion previously expressed, (c) if applicable, a statement that thepreviously issued financial statements have been restated for the correction of a
misstatement in the respective period, (d) the circumstances or events that caused theauditor to express a different opinion, and (e) if applicable, a reference to the company's
disclosure of the correction of the misstatement, and (f) the fact that the auditor's
updated opinion on the financial statements of the prior period is different from his or
her previous opinion on those statements. The following is an example of an
explanatory a report paragraph that may be appropriate when an auditor issues an
updated report on the financial statements of a prior period that contains an opinion
different from the opinion previously expressed:

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-40

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of X Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, the related statements of [titlesof the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders'equity, and cash flows] for each of the years then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of X the Company as of December 31, 20X2 and
20X1, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years thenended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America.
In our report dated March 1, 20X2, we expressed an opinion that the 20X1
financial statements did not fairly present financial position, results of operations,and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America because of two departures from such principles: (1) the
Company carried its property, plant, and equipment at appraisal values, andprovided for depreciation on the basis of such values, and (2) the Company did
not provide for deferred income taxes with respect to differences between
income for financial reporting purposes and taxable income. As described in Note
X, the Company has changed its method of accounting for these items andrestated its 20X1 financial statements to conform with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, our present
opinion on the 20X1 financial statements, as presented herein, is different fromthat expressed in our previous report. 1526
Basis for Opinion[Same first and second paragraphs as the standard report Same basic elements
as the Basis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-41

We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
1526

See footnote 617.

Report of Predecessor Auditor.5470 A predecessor auditor ordinarily would be in a position to reissue his or her reporton the financial statements of a prior period at the request of a former client if he or she
is able to make satisfactory arrangements with the former client to perform this service
and if he or she performs the procedures described in paragraph .5571.1627
1627

It is recognized that there may be reasons why a predecessor auditor's report may
not be reissued and this section does not address the various situations that could
arise.
Predecessor Auditor's Report Reissued.5571 Before reissuing (or consenting to the reuse of) a report previously issued on thefinancial statements of a prior period, when those financial statements are to bepresented on a comparative basis with audited financial statements of a subsequent
period, a predecessor auditor should consider whether his or her previous report on
those statements is still appropriate. Either the current form or manner of presentationof the financial statements of the prior period or one or more subsequent events mightmake a predecessor auditor's previous report inappropriate. Consequently, apredecessor auditor should (a) read the financial statements of the current period, (b)compare the prior-period financial statements that he or she reported on with thefinancial statements to be presented for comparative purposes, and (c) obtainrepresentation letters from management of the former client and from the successor
auditor. The representation letter from management of the former client should state (a)whether any information has come to management's attention that would cause them tobelieve that any of the previous representations should be modified, and (b) whether
any events have occurred subsequent to the balance-sheet date of the latest priorperiod financial statements reported on by the predecessor auditor that would require
adjustment to or disclosure in those financial statements.1728 The representation letterfrom the successor auditor should state whether the successor's audit revealed any
matters that, in the successor's opinion, might have a material effect on, or require
disclosure in, the financial statements reported on by the predecessor auditor. Also, thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-42

predecessor auditor may wish to consider the matters described in paragraphs AS
1205.10 through .12 of AS 1205, Part of the Audit Performed by Other Independent
Auditors. However, the predecessor auditor should not refer in his or her reissued reportto the report or work of the successor auditor.
1728

See AS 2805, Management Representations, appendix C [paragraph .18],"Illustrative Updating Management Representation Letter.".5672 A predecessor auditor who has agreed to reissue his or her report may becomeaware of events or transactions occurring subsequent to the date of his or her previous
report on the financial statements of a prior period that may affect his or her previous
report (for example, the successor auditor might indicate in the response that certain
matters have had a material effect on the prior-period financial statements reported onby the predecessor auditor). In such circumstances, the predecessor auditor shouldmake inquiries and perform other procedures that he or she considers necessary (forexample, reviewing the working papers of the successor auditor as they relate to thematters affecting the prior-period financial statements). The auditor should then decide,on the basis of the evidential matter obtained, whether to revise the report. If apredecessor auditor concludes that the report should be revised, he or she should
follow the guidance in paragraphs .5268, .5369, and .5773 of this section.
.5773 A predecessor auditor's knowledge of the current affairs of his former client isobviously limited in the absence of a continuing relationship. Consequently, whenreissuing the report on prior-period financial statements, a predecessor auditor should
use the date of his or her previous report to avoid any implication that he or she has
examined any records, transactions, or events after that date. If the predecessor auditor
revises the report or if the financial statements are adjusted, he or she should dual-date
the report. (See AS 3110.05.)
Predecessor Auditor's Report Not Presented.5874 If the financial statements of a prior period have been audited by a predecessor
auditor whose report is not presented, the successor auditor should indicate in the
introductory paragraph immediately following the opinion paragraph of his or her report(a) that the financial statements of the prior period were audited by another auditor,1829(b) the date of his or her report, (c) the type of report issued by the predecessor auditor,and (d) if the report was other than an standard unqualified report, the substantive
reasons therefor.1930 An example of a successor auditor's report when the predecessor
auditor's report is not presented is shown below:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-43

To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of ABC Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2, and the related statements of [titles of thefinancial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity,and cash flows]income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year thenended, and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred to as the"financial statements"). These financial statements are the responsibility of theCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesefinancial statements based on our audit. In our opinion, the 20X2 financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of ABC the Company as of December 31, 20X2, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The financial statements of ABC the Company as of December 31, 20X1, wereaudited by other auditors whose report dated March 31, 20X2, expressed an
unqualified opinion on those statements.
Basis for Opinion[Same second paragraph as the standard report Same basic elements as theBasis for Opinion section of the auditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
If the predecessor auditor's report contained an explanatory paragraph or was otherthan an standard unqualified report, the successor auditor should describe the nature ofand reasons for the explanatory paragraph added to the predecessor's report or the

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-44

opinion qualification. Following is an illustration of the wording that may be included in
the successor auditor's report:. . . were audited by other auditors whose report dated March 1, 20X2, on thosestatements included an explanatory paragraph that described the change in the
Company's method of computing depreciation discussed in Note X to thefinancial statements.
If the financial statements have been adjusted, the introductory paragraph Opinion on
the Financial Statements section should indicate that a predecessor auditor reported on
the financial statements of the prior period before the adjustments. In addition, if thesuccessor auditor is engaged to audit and applies sufficient procedures to satisfy
himself or herself as to the appropriateness of the adjustments, he or she may also
include the following paragraph in the auditor's report:
We also audited the adjustments described in Note X that were applied to restate
the 20X1 financial statements. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate
and have been properly applied.
1829

The successor auditor should not name the predecessor auditor in his or her report;
however, the successor auditor may name the predecessor auditor if the predecessor
auditor's practice was acquired by, or merged with, that of the successor auditor.
1930

If the predecessor's report was issued before the effective date of this section andcontained an uncertainties explanatory paragraph, a successor auditor's report issued
or reissued after the effective date hereof should not make reference to thepredecessor's previously required explanatory paragraph.

Management Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.59 In situations in which management is required to report on the company's internal
control over financial reporting but such report is not required to be audited, and theauditor has not been engaged to perform an audit of management's assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, the auditor should refer to theauditor's responsibilities regarding other information in documents containing audited
financial statements and the independent auditor's report under AS 2710, Other
Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements.
.60 In situations described in paragraph .59, the auditor must include statements in theauditor's report that:PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-45


The company is not required to have, nor was the auditor engaged toperform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting;

As part of the audit, the auditor is required to obtain an understanding ofinternal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company's internal
control over financial reporting; andThe auditor expresses no such opinion.

Following is an example of the Basis for Opinion section in the auditor's report that
contains such statements:[Basis for Opinion]
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Thosestandards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required tohave, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control overfinancial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain anunderstanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purposeof expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-46

Effective Date and Transition.75 This section is effective for reports issued or reissued on or after February 29, 1996.
Earlier application of the provisions of this section is permissible.
.76 An auditor who previously included an uncertainties explanatory paragraph in areport should not repeat that paragraph and is not required to include an emphasis
paragraph related to the uncertainty in a reissuance of that report or in a report on
subsequent periods' financial statements, even if the uncertainty has not been resolved.
If the auditor decides to include an emphasis paragraph related to the uncertainty, theparagraph may include an explanation of the change in reporting standards.
II.

Amendments to Other Auditing Standards

AS 1205, Part of the Audit Performed by Other Independent Auditors***.07 When the principal auditor decides that he will make reference to the audit of theother auditor, his report should indicate clearly, in both the introductory, scope andopinion paragraphs the Opinion on the Financial Statements and Basis for Opinion
sections, the division of responsibility as between that portion of the financial statements
covered by his own audit and that covered by the audit of the other auditor. The report
should disclose the magnitude of the portion of the financial statements audited by theother auditor. This may be done by stating the dollar amounts or percentages of one ormore of the following: total assets, total revenues, or other appropriate criteria,
whichever most clearly reveals the portion of the financial statements audited by theother auditor. The other auditor may be named but only with his express permission andprovided his report is presented together with that of the principal auditor.3***.09 An example of appropriate reporting by the principal auditor indicating the division of
responsibility when he makes reference to the audit of the other auditor follows:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of X Company
Opinion on the Financial Statements

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-47

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of X Company(the "Company") and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20...., and the related
consolidated statements of [titles of the financial statements, e.g., income,comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows]income andretained earnings and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes[and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "consolidated financial
statements"). In our opinion, based on our audit and the report of the otherauditors, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, inall material respects, the financial position of X the Company as of [at] December
31, 20...., and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year thenended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America.
We did not audit the financial statements of B Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary, which statements reflect total assets and revenues constituting 20
percent and 22 percent, respectively, of the related consolidated totals. Thosestatements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished tous, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for B Company,
is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements basedon our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks ofmaterial misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud,and performing procedures that respond to those risks. An audit Suchprocedures includes included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An Our audit
also includes assessing included evaluating the accounting principles used andsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-48

presentation of the financial statements presentation. We believe that our audit
and the report of the other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date]
When two or more auditors in addition to the principal auditor participate in the audit, thepercentages covered by the other auditors may be stated in the aggregate.
***
Other Auditor's Report Departs From Standard the Auditor's Unqualified Reportor Includes an Explanatory Paragraph.15 If the report of the other auditor is other than a standard an auditor's unqualified
report or includes explanatory language, the principal auditor should decide whether thereason for the departure from the standard auditor's unqualified report or the
explanatory language is of such nature and significance in relation to the financial
statements on which the principal auditor is reporting that it would require recognition in
his own report. If the reason for the departure is not material in relation to such financial
statements and the other auditor's report is not presented, the principal auditor need not
make reference in his report to such departure. If the other auditor's report is presented,
the principal auditor may wish to make reference to such departure and its disposition.
Restated Financial Statements of Prior Years Following a Pooling of Interests.16 Following a pooling-of-interests transaction, an auditor may be asked to report on
restated financial statements for one or more prior years when other auditors haveaudited one or more of the entities included in such financial statements. In some ofthese situations the auditor may decide that he has not audited a sufficient portion of thefinancial statements for such prior year or years to enable him to serve as principal
auditor (see paragraph .02). Also, in such cases, it often is not possible or it may not beappropriate or necessary for the auditor to satisfy himself with respect to the restated

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-49

financial statements. In these circumstances it may be appropriate for him to express
his opinion solely with respect to the combining of such statements; however, no
opinion should be expressed unless the auditor has audited the statements of at least
one of the entities included in the restatement for at least the latest period presented.
The following is an illustration of appropriate reporting on such combination that can bepresented in an additional paragraph of the auditor's report following the opinion
paragraph standard introductory, scope and opinion paragraphs covering theconsolidated financial statements for the current year:****
AS 1210, Using the Work of a Specialist***
Effect of the Specialist's Work on the Auditor's Report.13 If the auditor determines that the specialist's findings support the related assertionsin the financial statements, he or she reasonably may conclude that sufficientappropriate evidential matter has been obtained. If there is a material difference
between the specialist's findings and the assertions in the financial statements, he or
she should apply additional procedures. If after applying any additional procedures thatmight be appropriate the auditor is unable to resolve the matter, the auditor should
obtain the opinion of another specialist, unless it appears to the auditor that the mattercannot be resolved. A matter that has not been resolved ordinarily will cause the auditor
to conclude that he or she should qualify the opinion or disclaim an opinion because theinability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidential matter as to an assertion of material
significance in the financial statements constitutes a scope limitation. (See paragraphs.0522 and .0623 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departuresfrom Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.).14 The auditor may conclude after performing additional procedures, including possibly
obtaining the opinion of another specialist, that the assertions in the financial statements
are not in conformity with GAAP. In that event, the auditor should express a qualified or
adverse opinion. (See AS 31051.1835, .1936, and .2441.)
Reference to the Specialist in the Auditor's Report.15 Except as discussed in paragraph .16 the auditor should not refer to the work or
findings of the specialist. Such a reference might be misunderstood to be a qualificationof the auditor's opinion or a division of responsibility, neither of which is intended.
Further, there may be an inference that the auditor making such reference performed a

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-50

more thorough audit than an auditor not making such reference. Reference to the use ofa specialist may be made in the auditor's report in the following situations:a.

Critical Audit Matters—If such a reference will facilitate an understandingof the matter, the principal considerations that led the auditor to determinethat the matter was a critical audit matter, or how the critical audit matter
was addressed in the audit;7 orb.

Explanatory language or departure from an unqualified opinion—If such areference will facilitate an understanding of the reason for the explanatory
paragraph or departure from an unqualified opinion.

Otherwise the auditor should not refer to the work or findings of the specialist in theauditor's report.
7

Critical audit matters are described in AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit ofFinancial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion.
.16 The auditor may, as a result of the report or findings of the specialist, decide to add
explanatory language to his or her standard report or depart from an unqualified
opinion. Reference to and identification of the specialist may be made in the auditor'sreport if the auditor believes such reference will facilitate an understanding of the reason
for the explanatory paragraph or the departure from the unqualified opinion.
***
AS 1220, Engagement Quality Review***.10 In an audit, the engagement quality reviewer should:***
j. Based on the procedures required by this standard, evaluate the engagement team's
determination, communication, and documentation of critical audit matters inaccordance with AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements
When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion.
***PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-51

AS 1301, Communications with Audit Committees***
Departure from the Auditor's Standard Report The Auditor's Report.21 The auditor should communicate provide to and discuss with the audit committee
the following matters related to a draft of the auditor's report:.
a.
When the auditor expects to modify the opinion in the auditor's report, thereasons for the modification, and the wording of the report; andb.
When the auditor expects to include explanatory language or an explanatory
paragraph in the auditor's report, the reasons for the explanatory language orparagraph, and the wording of the explanatory language or paragraph.
***
Note: Difficulties encountered by the auditor during the audit could represent a scope
limitation,39 which may result in the auditor modifying the auditor's opinion orwithdrawing from the engagement.
39

See paragraphs .0522-.1532 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances, for a
discussion of scope limitations.
***
AS 2201, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated
with An Audit of Financial Statements***

Reporting on Internal Control.85 The auditor's report on the audit of internal control over financial reporting must
includes the following elements18 Title.85A The auditor's report must include the title, "Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm."

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-52

Addressee.85B The auditor's report must be addressed to the shareholders and the board of
directors, or equivalents for companies not organized as corporations. The auditor'sreport may include additional addressees.
Opinion on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting.85C The first section of the auditor's report on the audit of internal control over financial
reporting must include the section title "Opinion on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting" and the following elementsa. A title that includes the word independent;
a. The name of the company whose internal control over financial reporting was
audited; andb. k. The auditor's opinion on whether the company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of the specified date, based on thecontrol criteria.
Basis for Opinion.85D The second section of the auditor's report on the audit of internal control overfinancial reporting must include the section title "Basis for Opinion" and the following
elements:
ab. A statement that management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting;bc. An identification of management's report on internal control;
cd. A statement that the auditor's responsibility is to express an opinion on thecompany's internal control over financial reporting based on his or her audit;
d. A statement that the auditor is a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and is required to be
independent with respect to the company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities
laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB;PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-53

ef. A statement that the audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States);fg. A statement that the standards of the PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board require that the auditor plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonableassurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting wasmaintained in all material respects;
gh. A statement that an audit includeds obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing andevaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on theassessed risk, and performing such other procedures as the auditor considerednecessary in the circumstances; andhi. A statement that the auditor believes the audit provides a reasonable basis for his or
her opinion;.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.85E The third section of the auditor's report on the audit of internal control overfinancial reporting must include the section title "Definition and Limitations of Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting " and the following elements:
ae. A definition of internal control over financial reporting as stated in paragraph .A5;
bj. A paragraph stating that, because of inherent limitations, internal control overfinancial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and that projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Signature, Location, and Date
.85F The auditor's report must include the following elements:
al. The manual or printed signature of the auditor's firm;18A
bm. The city and state (or city and country, in the case of non-U.S. auditors) from which
the auditor's report has been issued; andcn. The date of the audit report.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-54
18A

See Regulation S-X Rule 2-02(a).

***.87 The following example combined report expressing an unqualified opinion on
financial statements and an unqualified opinion on internal control over financial
reporting illustrates the report elements described in this section.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of W Company[Introductory paragraph] Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of W Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X8 and 20X7, and the related statements of[titles of the financial statements, e.g., income, comprehensive income,stockholders' equity, and cash flows]income, stockholders' equity andcomprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 20X8, and the related notes [and schedules](collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited W
the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20X8,
based on [Identify control criteria, for example, "criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework: (20XX) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)."].
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in allmaterial respects, the financial position of W the Company as of December 31,
20X8 and 20X7, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20X8 in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in
our opinion, W the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20X8, based on[Identify control criteria, for example, "criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework: (20XX) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO)."].
Basis for Opinion[Scope paragraph]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-55

W The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, formaintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,included in the accompanying [title of management's report]. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these the Company's financial statements and an
opinion on the cCompany's internal control over financial reporting based on our
audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities andExchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting
was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess
the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due toerror or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Suchprocedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements., Our audits also
included evaluating assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control
over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, andtesting and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control
based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
[Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
paragraph]
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting andthe preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-56

financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to themaintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect thetransactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company arebeing made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directorsof the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
[Inherent limitations paragraph]
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters [if applicable][Include critical audit matters][Signature]
We have served as the Company's auditor since [year].
[City and State or Country][Date].88 If the auditor chooses to issue a separate report on internal control over financial
reporting, he or she should add the following paragraph (immediately following theopinion paragraph) to the auditor's report on the financial statements –We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the Company's internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20X8, based on [ identify
control criteria ] and our report dated [ date of report, which should be the sameas the date of the report on the financial statements ] expressed [ include natureof opinion ].

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-57

The auditor also should add the following paragraph (immediately following the opinion
paragraph) to the report on internal control over financial reporting –We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the [ identify financial
statements ] of the Company and our report dated [ date of report, which shouldbe the same as the date of the report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting ] expressed [ include nature of opinion ].
***.B16 In situations in which the SEC allows management to limit its assessment ofinternal control over financial reporting by excluding certain entities, the auditor may
limit the audit in the same manner. In these situations, the auditor's opinion would not
be affected by a scope limitation. However, the auditor should include, either in an
additional explanatory paragraph or as part of the scope paragraph Basis for Opinion
section in his or her report, a disclosure similar to management's regarding theexclusion of an entity from the scope of both management's assessment and theauditor's audit of internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, the auditor should
evaluate the reasonableness of management's conclusion that the situation meets thecriteria of the SEC's allowed exclusion and the appropriateness of any required
disclosure related to such a limitation. If the auditor believes that management's
disclosure about the limitation requires modification, the auditor should follow the samecommunication responsibilities that are described in paragraphs .29 through .32 of AS
4105, Reviews of Interim Financial Information. If management and the audit committee
do not respond appropriately, in addition to fulfilling those responsibilities, the auditor
should modify his or her report on the audit of internal control over financial reporting toinclude an explanatory paragraph describing the reasons why the auditor believes
management's disclosure requires modification.
***.C4 When disclaiming an opinion because of a scope limitation, the auditor should statethat the scope of the audit was not sufficient to warrant the expression of an opinion
and, in a separate paragraph or paragraphs, the substantive reasons for the disclaimer.
The auditor should not identify the procedures that were performed nor include thestatements describing the characteristics of an audit of internal control over financial
reporting (paragraph .85D f, g, and h, and i); to do so might overshadow the disclaimer.
***

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-58

AS 2405, Illegal Acts by Clients***.21 The auditor may be unable to determine whether an act is illegal because oflimitations imposed by the circumstances rather than by the client or because of
uncertainty associated with interpretation of applicable laws or regulations or
surrounding facts. In these circumstances, the auditor should consider the effect on his
report.2
2

See AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified
Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.
***
AS 2410, Related Parties***
Assertions That Transactions with Related Parties Were Conducted on Terms
Equivalent to Those Prevailing in Arm's-Length Transactions.18 If the financial statements include a statement by management that transactions
with related parties were conducted on terms equivalent to those prevailing in an arm'slength transaction, the auditor should determine whether the evidence obtained
supports or contradicts management's assertion. If the auditor is unable to obtainsufficient appropriate audit evidence to substantiate management's assertion, and if
management does not agree to modify the disclosure, the auditor should express aqualified or adverse opinion.20
20

See AS 2805.06l, which requires the auditor to obtain written representations frommanagement if the financial statements include such an assertion. Representations
from management alone are not sufficient appropriate audit evidence. See also
paragraphs .1835–.1936 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.
***
AS 2415, Consideration of an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern***

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-59.03 The auditor should evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the entity's
ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time in the following
manner:***c.
After the auditor has evaluated management's plans, he concludes
whether he has substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
concern for a reasonable period of time. If the auditor concludes there issubstantial doubt, he should (1) consider the adequacy of disclosure about theentity's possible inability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable periodof time, and (2) include an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title(immediately following the opinion paragraph), in his audit report to reflect his
conclusion. If the auditor concludes that substantial doubt does not exist, heshould consider the need for disclosure.
.12 If, after considering identified conditions and events and management's plans, theauditor concludes that substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
concern for a reasonable period of time remains, the audit report should include an
explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title (immediately following the opinion
paragraph), to reflect that conclusion.4 The auditor's conclusion about the entity's ability
to continue as a going concern should be expressed through the use of the phrase"substantial doubt about its (the entity's) ability to continue as a going concern" [orsimilar wording that includes the terms substantial doubt and going concern] as
illustrated in paragraph .13.
4

The inclusion of an explanatory paragraph (immediately following the opinion
paragraph) in the auditor's report contemplated by this section should serve adequately
to inform the users of the financial statements. Nothing in this section, however, isintended to preclude an auditor from declining to express an opinion in cases involving
uncertainties. If he disclaims an opinion, the uncertainties and their possible effects on
the financial statements should be disclosed in an appropriate manner (see paragraph.10), and the auditor's report should give all the substantive reasons for his disclaimer of
opinion (see paragraphs .44-.47 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances).
.13 An example follows of an explanatory paragraph (immediately following the opinion
paragraph) in the auditor's report describing an uncertainty about the entity's ability tocontinue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.5[Appropriate Title]PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-60

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that theCompany will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note X to thefinancial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations
and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability tocontinue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters arealso described in Note X. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
.14 If the auditor concludes that the entity's disclosures with respect to the entity's ability
to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time are inadequate, adeparture from generally accepted accounting principles exists. This may result in either
a qualified (except for) or an adverse opinion. Reporting guidance for such situations isprovided in AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements.
.15 Substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for areasonable period of time that arose in the current period does not imply that a basis forsuch doubt existed in the prior period and, therefore, should not affect the auditor'sreport on the financial statements of the prior period that are presented on acomparative basis. When financial statements of one or more prior periods arepresented on a comparative basis with financial statements of the current period,
reporting guidance is provided in AS 31051.
***
AS 2503, Auditing Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities, and Investments in
Securities***.32 There may be a time lag in reporting between the date of the financial statements of
the investor and that of the investee. A time lag in reporting should be consistent fromperiod to period. If a time lag between the date of the entity’s financial statements andthose of the investee has a material effect on the entity’s financial statements, theauditor should determine whether the entity’s management has properly considered thelack of comparability. The effect may be material, for example, because the time lag is
not consistent with the prior period in comparative statements or because a significant
transaction occurred during the time lag. If a change in time lag occurs that has amaterial effect on the investor’s financial statements, an explanatory paragraph,including an appropriate title, should be added to the auditor’s report because of thechange in reporting period.15

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-61
15

See paragraphs .16–.18 of AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements AS
2820, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements.
***
AS 2505, Inquiry of a Client's Lawyer Concerning Litigation, Claims, andAssessments***.13 A lawyer's refusal to furnish the information requested in an inquiry letter either inwriting or orally (see paragraphs .09 and .10) would be a limitation on the scope of theaudit sufficient to preclude an unqualified opinion (see paragraphs .0522 and .0623 of
AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified
Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances).7 A lawyer's response to such an inquiry
and the procedures set forth in paragraph .05 provide the auditor with sufficientevidential matter to satisfy himself concerning the accounting for and reporting ofpending and threatened litigation, claims and assessments. The auditor obtains
sufficient evidential matter to satisfy himself concerning reporting for those unasserted
claims and assessments required to be disclosed in financial statements from theforegoing procedures and the lawyer's specific acknowledgement of his responsibility to
his client in respect of disclosure obligations (see paragraph .09g). This approach withrespect to unasserted claims and assessments is necessitated by the public interest inprotecting the confidentiality of lawyer-client communications.
.14 A lawyer may be unable to respond concerning the likelihood of an unfavorable
outcome of litigation, claims, and assessments or the amount or range of potential loss,
because of inherent uncertainties. Factors influencing the likelihood of an unfavorable
outcome may sometimes not be within a lawyer's competence to judge; historicalexperience of the entity in similar litigation or the experience of other entities may not be
relevant or available; and the amount of the possible loss frequently may vary widely at
different stages of litigation. Consequently, a lawyer may not be able to form aconclusion with respect to such matters. In such circumstances, the auditor ordinarily
will conclude that the financial statements are affected by an uncertainty concerning theoutcome of a future event which is not susceptible of reasonable estimation, and shouldlook to the guidance in AS 31051.2845 through .3249 to determine the effect, if any, ofthe lawyer's response on the auditor's report.
***

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-62

AS 2510, Auditing Inventories***.15 For a discussion of the circumstances relating to receivables and inventories
affecting the independent auditor's report, see paragraphs .0724 and .5167 of AS
31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions
and Other Reporting Circumstances.
***
AS 2610, Initial Audits—Communications Between Predecessor and Successor
Auditors***
9

See paragraphs .5470 through .5874 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial
Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances,
for reporting guidance.
***
AS 2705, Required Supplementary Information***.03 Some entities may voluntarily include, in documents containing audited financial
statements, certain supplementary information that is required of other entities. Whenan entity voluntarily includes such information as a supplement to the financial
statements or in an unaudited note to the financial statements, the provisions of thissection are applicable unless either the entity indicates that the auditor has not applied
the procedures described in this section or the auditor includes in an explanatory
paragraph, including an appropriate title, in his report on the audited financial
statements a disclaimer on the information. The following is an example of a disclaimer
an auditor might use in these circumstances:[Appropriate Title]
The [identify the supplementary information] on page XX (or in Note XX) is not arequired part of the basic financial statements, and we did not audit or apply
limited procedures to such information and do not express any assurances onsuch information.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-63***.08 Since the supplementary information is not audited and is not a required part of thebasic financial statements, the auditor need not add an explanatory paragraph to thereport on the audited financial statements to refer to the supplementary information or tohis or her limited procedures, except in any of the following circumstances:7 (a) the
supplementary information that GAAP requires to be presented in the circumstances isomitted; (b) the auditor has concluded that the measurement or presentation of the
supplementary information departs materially from prescribed guidelines; (c) the auditor
is unable to complete the prescribed procedures; (d) the auditor is unable to remove
substantial doubts about whether the supplementary information conforms to prescribedguidelines. Since the required supplementary information does not change thestandards of financial accounting and reporting used for the preparation of the entity's
basic financial statements, the circumstances described above do not affect theauditor's opinion on the fairness of presentation of such financial statements inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Furthermore, the auditor need
not present the supplementary information if it is omitted by the entity. The following are
examples of additional explanatory paragraphs, including appropriate titles, an auditor
might use in these circumstances.
***
AS 2710, Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial
Statements***.04 Other information in a document may be relevant to an audit performed by anindependent auditor or to the continuing propriety of his report. The auditor's
responsibility with respect to information in a document does not extend beyond thefinancial information identified in his report, and the auditor has no obligation to perform
any procedures to corroborate other information contained in a document. However, heshould read the other information and consider whether such information, or the mannerof its presentation, is materially inconsistent with information, or the manner of its
presentation, appearing in the financial statements.2 If the auditor concludes that there
is a material inconsistency, he should determine whether the financial statements, his
report, or both require revision. If he concludes that they do not require revision, heshould request the client to revise the other information. If the other information is notrevised to eliminate the material inconsistency, he should communicate the materialinconsistency to the audit committee and consider other actions, such as revising his
report to include an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title, describing thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-64

material inconsistency, withholding the use of his report in the document, andwithdrawing from the engagement. The action he takes will depend on the particular
circumstances and the significance of the inconsistency in the other information.
***
AS 2801, Subsequent Events***.09 Occasionally, a subsequent event of the second type has such a material impact on
the entity that the auditor may wish to include in his report an explanatory emphasis
paragraph directing the reader's attention to the event and its effects. (See paragraph.19 of AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements, The Auditor's Report on an
Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion)***
AS 2805, Management Representations***
15

See paragraph .5571 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.
***18

See AS 31051.0522–.1734.

***
AS 2810, Evaluating Audit Results***
7

If the financial statements contain material misstatements, AS 31051, Reports on
Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances, indicates that the auditor should issue a qualified or anadverse opinion on the financial statements. AS 31051.1835 discusses situations inwhich the financial statements are materially affected by a departure from the applicablefinancial reporting framework.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-65

***
.31
***
Note: According to AS 31051, if the financial statements, including the accompanying
notes, fail to disclose information that is required by the applicable financial reporting
framework, the auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion and should
provide the information in the report, if practicable, unless its omission from the report isrecognized as appropriate by a specific auditing standard.18
18

AS 31051.2441–.2744.

***.35 If the auditor has not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence about a relevant
assertion or has substantial doubt about a relevant assertion, the auditor should perform
procedures to obtain further audit evidence to address the matter. If the auditor isunable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to have a reasonable basis toconclude about whether the financial statements as a whole are free of material
misstatement, AS 31051 indicates that the auditor should express a qualified opinion ora disclaimer of opinion.21
21

AS 31051.0522–.1734 contains requirements regarding audit scope limitations.

***
Appendix B
1

If the financial statements contain material misstatements, AS 31051, Reports on
Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances, indicates that the auditor should issue a qualified or anadverse opinion on the financial statements. AS 31051.1835 discusses situations inwhich the financial statements are materially affected by a departure from the applicablefinancial reporting framework.
***

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-66

Appendix C
2Denial of access to information might constitute a limitation on the scope of the audit
that requires the auditor to qualify or disclaim an opinion. (See AS 2201, An Audit ofInternal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial
Statements, and AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from
Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.)***
AS 2815, The Meaning of "Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles".01 An independent auditor's report contains an opinion as to whether the financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, an entity’s financial position, results ofoperations, and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
An identification of the applicable financial reporting framework country of origin of thosegenerally accepted accounting principles also is required (see paragraph .08h of AS
3101paragraph .08e of the AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial
Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion).
The purpose of this section is to explain the meaning of "present fairly" as used in thephrase "present fairly . . . in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles."In applying this section, the auditor should look to the requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission for the company under audit with respect to the accounting
principles applicable to that company.
***
1

The concept of materiality is inherent in the auditor's judgments. That concept involves
qualitative as well as quantitative judgments (see AS 2105, Consideration of Materiality
in Planning and Performing an Audit, and AS 31051.1936).
***
AS 2820, Evaluating Consistency of Financial Statements***.06 The auditor should evaluate and report on a change in accounting estimate effectedby a change in accounting principle like other changes in accounting principle.5 In
addition, the auditor should recognize a change in the reporting entity6 by including an

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-67

explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title, in the auditor's report, unless thechange in reporting entity results from a transaction or event. A change in reporting
entity that results from a transaction or event, such as the creation, cessation, orcomplete or partial purchase or disposition of a subsidiary or other business unit does
not require recognition in the auditor's report.
***.08 A change in accounting principle that has a material effect on the financial
statements should be recognized in the auditor's report on the audited financial
statements. If the auditor concludes that the criteria in paragraph .07 have been met,
the auditor should add an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title, to theauditor's report, as described in AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
paragraphs .12-.15 of this standard. If those criteria are not met, the auditor should treat
this accounting change as a departure from generally accepted accounting principles
and, if the effect of the change in accounting principle is material, issue a qualified or anadverse opinion address the matter as described in AS 3101.8A
Note: If a company's financial statements contain an investment accounted for by
the equity method, the auditor's evaluation of consistency should include
consideration of the investee. If the investee makes a change in accounting
principle that is material to the investing company's financial statements, theauditor should add an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title(immediately following the opinion paragraph), to the auditor's report, as
described in AS 3101 paragraphs .12-.15.
8A

AS 3105, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances,
describes reporting requirements related to a qualified or an adverse opinion.
Correction of a Material Misstatement in Previously Issued Financial Statements.09 The correction of a material misstatement in previously issued financial statements
should be recognized in the auditor's report on the audited financial statements throughthe addition of an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title, as described in
AS 3101 paragraphs .16 and.17 of this standard.
.10 The accounting pronouncements generally require certain disclosures relating torestatements to correct misstatements in previously issued financial statements. If thefinancial statement disclosures are not adequate, the auditor should address theinadequacy of disclosure as described in paragraph .31 of AS 2810, Evaluating AuditPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-68

Results, and AS 31051, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances.
Change in Classification.11 Changes in classification in previously issued financial statements do not require
recognition in the auditor's report, unless the change represents the correction of amaterial misstatement or a change in accounting principle. Accordingly, the auditor
should evaluate a material change in financial statement classification and the related
disclosure to determine whether such a change also is a change in accounting principle
or a correction of a material misstatement. For example, certain reclassifications inpreviously issued financial statements, such as reclassifications of debt from long-term
to short-term or reclassifications of cash flows from the operating activities category to
the financing activities category, might occur because those items were incorrectlyclassified in the previously issued financial statements. In such situations, thereclassification also is the correction of a misstatement. If the auditor determines thatthe reclassification is a change in accounting principle, he or she should address thematter as described in paragraphs .07, and .08, and AS 3101 .12-.15. If the auditor
determines that the reclassification is a correction of a material misstatement inpreviously issued financial statements, he or she should address the matter as
described in paragraphs .09, and .10, and AS 3101 .16 and.17.
Reporting on Consistency of Financial Statements
Change in Accounting Principle.12 A change in accounting principle that has a material effect on the financial
statements should be recognized in the auditor's report on the audited financial
statements through the addition of an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate
title (immediately following the opinion paragraph). The explanatory paragraph should
include identification of the nature of the change and a reference to the note disclosure
describing the change.
.13 The following is an example of an explanatory paragraph for a change in accounting
principle resulting from the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement:[Appropriate Title]
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the Company has changed its
method of accounting for [describe accounting method changes] in [year(s) offinancial statements that reflect the accounting method change] due to theadoption of [name of accounting pronouncement].

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-69.14 The following is an example of an explanatory paragraph for a change in accounting
principle other than a change due to the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement:[Appropriate Title]
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the Company has elected tochange its method of accounting for [describe accounting method changes] in[year(s) of financial statements that reflect the accounting method change].
.15 The explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting principle should be
included in reports on financial statements in the year of the change and in subsequent
years until the new accounting principle is applied in all periods presented. If the new
accounting change is accounted for by retrospective application to the financial
statements of all prior periods presented, the additional paragraph is needed only in theyear of the change.
Correction of a Material Misstatement in Previously Issued Financial Statements.16 Correction of a material misstatement in previously issued financial statements
should be recognized in the auditor's report through the addition of an explanatory
paragraph, including an appropriate title (immediately following the opinion
paragraph).10 The explanatory paragraph should include (1) a statement that thepreviously issued financial statements have been restated for the correction of a
misstatement in the respective period and (2) a reference to the note disclosure
describing the correction of the misstatement. The following is an example of an
appropriate explanatory paragraph when there has been a correction of a material
misstatement in previously issued financial statements:[Appropriate Title]
As discussed in Note X to the financial statements, the 20X2 financial statements
have been restated to correct a misstatement.
10

AS 3105.52-53 apply when comparative financial statements are presented and theopinion on the prior-period financial statements differs from the opinion previously
expressed.
.17 This type of explanatory paragraph in the auditor's report should be included inreports on financial statements when the related financial statements are restated tocorrect the prior material misstatement. The paragraph need not be repeated insubsequent years.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-70***
AS 3110, Dating of the Independent Auditor's Report.06 An independent auditor may reissue his report on financial statements contained inannual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or other regulatory
agencies or in a document he submits to his client or to others that contains informationin addition to the client's basic financial statements subsequent to the date of his originalreport on the basic financial statements. An independent auditor may also be requested
by his client to furnish additional copies of a previously issued report. Use of the originalreport date in a reissued report removes any implication that records, transactions, or
events after that date have been examined or reviewed. In such cases, the independent
auditor has no responsibility to make further investigation or inquiry as to events which
may have occurred during the period between the original report date and the date of
the release of additional reports. However, see AS 4101 as to an auditor's responsibility
when his report is included in a registration statement filed under the Securities Act of1933 and see paragraphs .5470–.5773 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial
Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances,
for the predecessor auditor's responsibility when reissuing or consenting to the reuse ofa report previously issued on the financial statements of a prior period.
***
AS 3305, Special Reports.01 This section applies to auditors' reports issued in connection with the following:***e. Financial information presented in prescribed forms or schedules that require aprescribed form of auditor's reports (paragraphs .32 and .33)
Note: In situations in which an auditor's report described in this section is filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the auditor is required to include in theauditor's report the basic elements and, for reports under subparagraph .01a,
communication of critical audit matters, as would be required in an unqualified auditor'sreporting under AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements
When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion. For qualified, adverse, anddisclaimer of opinion reports, see requirements of AS 3105, Departures from
Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances.
***PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-71
2

In some instances, a document containing the auditor's report may include astatement by management regarding its responsibility for the presentation of thefinancial statements. Nevertheless, the auditor's report should state that the financial
statements are management's responsibility. However, the statement about
management's responsibility should not be further elaborated upon in the auditor's
standard report or referenced to management's report.
***.06 Unless the financial statements meet the conditions for presentation in conformity
with a "comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting
principles" as defined in paragraph .04, the auditor should modify his or her report use
the standard form of report (see paragraph .08 of AS 3101, Reports on Audited
Financial Statements) modified as appropriate because of the departures from generally
accepted accounting principles (see AS 3105).
***.12 When expressing an opinion on one or more specified elements, accounts, or itemsof a financial statement, the auditor should plan and perform the audit and prepare hisor her report with a view to the purpose of the engagement. With the exception of therequirement in AS 3101.08h, tThe standards of the PCAOB are applicable to any
engagement to express an opinion on one or more specified elements, accounts, oritems of a financial statement. AS 3101.08h, which requires that the auditor's reportstate whether the financial statements are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, is applicable only when If the specified elements,
accounts, or items of a financial statement are intended to be presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles, the requirements for the auditor's report,
as described in AS 3101 and AS 3105, are applicable.
***.14 The auditor should not express an opinion on specified elements, accounts, or items
included in financial statements on which he or she has expressed an adverse opinion
or disclaimed an opinion based on an audit, if such reporting would be tantamount toexpressing a piecemeal opinion on the financial statements (see AS 31051.4864).
However, an auditor would be able to express an opinion on one or more specified
elements, accounts, or items of a financial statement provided that the matters to bereported on and the related scope of the audit were not intended to and did notencompass so many elements, accounts, or items as to constitute a major portion of thefinancial statements. For example, it may be appropriate for an auditor to express an

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-72

opinion on an entity's accounts receivable balance even if the auditor has disclaimed an
opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. However, the report on thespecified element, account, or item should be presented separately from the report on
the financial statements of the entity.
Reports on One or More Specified Elements, Accounts, or Items of a Financial
Statement.15 When an independent auditor is engaged to express an opinion on one or more
specified elements, accounts, or items of a financial statement, the report should
include—***b.

A paragraph that—(1) States that the specified elements, accounts, or items identified in thereport were audited. If the audit was made in conjunction with an audit of
the company's financial statements, the paragraph should so state andindicate the date of the auditor's report on those financial statements.
Furthermore, any departure from the standard auditor's unqualified reporton those statements should also be disclosed if considered relevant to thepresentation of the specified element, account or item.
(2) States that the specified elements, accounts, or items are theresponsibility of the Company's management and that the auditor is
responsible for expressing an opinion on the specified elements, accounts
or items based on the audit.

***.17 The auditor should consider the effect that any departure, including additional
explanatory language because of the circumstances discussed in AS 3101.181, fromthe standard auditor's unqualified report on the audited financial statements might haveon the report on a specified element, account, or item thereof.
***.21 When an auditor's report on compliance with contractual agreements or regulatory
provisions is included in the report that expresses the auditor's opinion on the financial
statements, the auditor should include a paragraph, after the opinion paragraph in theOpinion on the Financial Statements section, that provides negative assurance relative
to compliance with the applicable covenants of the agreement, insofar as they relate toPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-73

accounting matters, and that specifies the negative assurance is being given inconnection with the audit of the financial statements. The auditor should also ordinarily
state that the audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge regarding
compliance. In addition, the report should include a paragraph that includes a
description and source of any significant interpretations made by the entity's
management as discussed in paragraph .20d as well as a paragraph that restricts theuse of the report to the specified parties as discussed in paragraph .20e. Following are
examples of reports that might be issued:***.31 Certain circumstances, while not affecting the auditor's unqualified opinion, may
require that the auditor add additional explanatory language to the special report. These
circumstances include the following:a.

Lack of Consistency in Accounting Principles. If there has been a changein accounting principles or in the method of their application,35 the auditor
should add an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate title, to thereport (immediately following the opinion paragraph) that describes thechange and refers to the note to the financial presentation (or specified
elements, accounts, or items thereof) that discusses the change and its
effect thereon 36 if the accounting change is considered relevant to thepresentation. Guidance on reporting in this situation is contained in AS
3101.16 through .18 AS 2820, Evaluating Consistency of Financial
Statements.

b.

Going Concern Uncertainties. If the auditor has substantial doubt about
the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable periodof time not to exceed one year beyond the date of the financial statement,
the auditor should add an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate
title, after the opinion paragraph of the report only if the auditor's
substantial doubt is relevant to the presentation.39c.

Other Auditors. When the auditor decides to make reference to the reportof another auditor as a basis, in part, for his or her opinion, the auditor
should disclose that fact in the introductory paragraph of the report andshould refer to the report of the other auditors in expressing his or her
opinion. Guidance on reporting in this situation is contained in section AS
3101.12 and .13 AS 1205, Part of the Audit Performed by Other
Independent Auditors.

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-74

d.

Comparative Financial Statements (or Specified Elements, Accounts, or
Items Thereof).If the auditor expresses an opinion on prior-period financial
statements (or specified elements, accounts, or items thereof) that isdifferent from the opinion he or she previously expressed on that same
information, the auditor should disclose all of the substantive reasons forthe different opinion in a separate explanatory paragraph preceding
immediately following the opinion paragraph of the report. Guidance onreporting in this situation is contained in AS 31051.5268 and .5369.

***
AS 3310, Special Reports on Regulated Companies***.02 The basic postulates and broad principles of accounting comprehended in the term
"generally accepted accounting principles" which pertain to business enterprises ingeneral apply also to companies whose accounting practices are prescribed bygovernmental regulatory authorities or commissions. (For example, public utilities andinsurance companies.) Accordingly, the requirement in paragraph .08eh of AS 3101,
Reports on Audited Financial Statements The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial
Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, is equally applicable
to opinions on financial statements of such regulated companies presented for purposes
other than filings with their respective supervisory agencies; and material variancesfrom generally accepted accounting principles, and their effects, should be dealt with in
the independent auditor's report in the same manner followed for companies which are
not regulated.1 Ordinarily, this will require either a qualified or an adverse opinion onsuch statements. An adverse opinion may be accompanied by an opinion on
supplementary data which are presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
***.04 When financial statements of a regulated entity are prepared in accordance with abasis of accounting prescribed by one or more regulatory agencies or the financial
reporting provisions of another agency, the independent auditor may also be requested
to report on their fair presentation in conformity with such prescribed basis of accounting
in presentations for distribution in other than filings with the entity's regulatory agency. In
those circumstances, the auditor should use the standard form of report (see AS
3101.08), modified modify the auditor's report as appropriate (see paragraphs .18-.43 of
AS 31051.35–.60, Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other ReportingPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-75

Circumstances) because of the departures from generally accepted accounting
principles, and then, in an additional paragraph to the report, express an opinion onwhether the financial statements are presented in conformity with the prescribed basisof accounting.
***AS 3315, Reporting on Condensed Financial Statement and Selected Financial
Data***.02 In reporting on condensed financial statements or selected financial data incircumstances other than those described in paragraph .01, the auditor should follow
the guidance in paragraphs .2441 through .2744 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited
Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances, AS 3305, Special Reports, or other applicable PCAOB standards.2***.06 The following is an example of wording that an auditor may use in thecircumstances described in paragraph .01(a) to report on condensed financial
statements that are derived from financial statements that he or she has audited and on
which he or she has issued a standard an auditor's unqualified report:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), the consolidatedbalance sheet of X Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20X0, and therelated consolidated statements of [titles of the financial statements, e.g.,income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows]income,retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein);
and in our report dated February 15, 20X1, we expressed an unqualified opinion
on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial statementsfrom which it has been derived.
.07 A client might make a statement in a client-prepared document that names theauditor and also states that condensed financial statements have been derived fromaudited financial statements. Such a statement does not, in itself, require the auditor toPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-76

report on the condensed financial statements, provided that they are included in adocument that contains audited financial statements (or that incorporates suchstatements by reference to information filed with a regulatory agency). However, if sucha statement is made in a client-prepared document of a public entity that is required tofile, at least annually, complete audited financial statements with a regulatory agency
and that document does not include audited financial statements (or does notincorporate such statements by reference to information filed with a regulatory agency),
6
the auditor should request that the client either (a) not include the auditor's name inthe document or (b), include the auditor's report on the condensed financial statements,
as described in paragraph .05. If the client will neither delete the reference to the auditor
nor allow the appropriate report to be included, the auditor should advise the client that
he does not consent to either the use of his name or the reference to him, and heshould consider what other actions might be appropriate.7
6

If such a statement is made in a client-prepared document that does not include
audited financial statements and the client is not a public entity that is required to filecomplete audited financial statements with a regulatory agency (at least annually), theauditor would ordinarily express an adverse opinion on the condensed financial
statements because of inadequate disclosure. (See AS 3101.41 through .44) The
auditor would not be expected to provide the disclosure in his report. The following is an
example of an auditor's report on condensed financial statements in such circumstances
when the auditor had previously audited and reported on the complete financial
statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of X Company and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 20X0, and the related earnings, and cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein). These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our
audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on atest basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used andsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as ofDecember 31, 20X0, and the related condensed statements of income, retainedPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-77

earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended, presented on pages xx-xx, arepresented as a summary and therefore do not include all of the disclosuresrequired by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica. In our opinion, because of the significance of the omission of theinformation referred to in the preceding paragraph, the condensed consolidated
financial statements referred to above do not present fairly, in conformity withaccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, thefinancial position of X Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20X0, or
the results of its operations or its cash flows for the year then ended. [Footnote
revised, October 2000, to reflect conforming changes necessary due to theissuance of Statement on Auditing Standards No. 93.]***
.10 The following is an example of an additional paragraph included in the Opinion on
the Financial Statements section of the auditor's report that includes an additional
paragraph because he the auditor is also engaged to report on selected financial data
for a five-year period ended December 31, 1920X5, in a client-prepared document that
includes audited financial statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ABC Company andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 19X5 and 19X4, and the related consolidated
statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 19X5. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing theaccounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provided a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Opinion on the Financial Statements

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-78[Same basic elements in the Opinion on the Financial Statements section as theauditor's unqualified report in AS 3101]
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the ABC the Company andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 20X5 and 20X4, and the results of theiroperations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 20X5, in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America.
We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), theconsolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 20X3, 20X2, and 20X1, and therelated statements of [titles of the financial statements, e.g., income,comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows] for the years ended
December 31, 20X2, and 20X1, and the related notes [and schedules](collectively referred to as the "20X3, 20X2, and 20X1 consolidated financial
statements") (none of which are presented herein); and we expressed unqualified
opinions on those 20X3, 20X2, and 20X1 consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the selected financial data for each of thefive years in the period ended December 31, 20X5, appearing on page xx, isfairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated financial
statements from which it has been derived.
***
AS 3320, Association with Financial Statements***.04 An accountant may be associated with audited or unaudited financial statements.
Financial statements are audited if the accountant has applied auditing procedures
sufficient to permit him to report on them as described in AS 3101, The Auditor's Reporton an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified
Opinion, and AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from
Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances. The unaudited interim
financial statements (or financial information) of a public entity are reviewed when theaccountant has applied procedures sufficient to permit him to report on them as
described in AS 4105, Reviews of Interim Financial Information.
***PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-79

AS 4101, Responsibilities Regarding Filings Under Federal Securities Statutes***.11 A registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may
contain the reports of two or more independent auditors on their audits of the financial
statements for different periods. An auditor who has audited the financial statements forprior periods but has not audited the financial statements for the most recent audited
period included in the registration statement has a responsibility relating to events
subsequent to the date of the prior-period financial statements, and extending to theeffective date, that bear materially on the prior-period financial statements on which hereported. Generally, he shoulda.

Read pertinent portions of the prospectus and of the registration
statement.

b.

Obtain a letter of representation from the successor independent auditor
regarding whether his audit (including his procedures with respect tosubsequent events) revealed any matters that, in his opinion, might have amaterial effect on the financial statements reported on by the predecessor
auditor or would require disclosure in the notes thereto.

The auditor should make inquiries and perform other procedures that he considers
necessary to satisfy himself regarding the appropriateness of any adjustment ordisclosure affecting the prior-period financial statements covered by his report (see AS
31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions
and Other Reporting Circumstances).
***
AS 4105, Reviews of Interim Financial Information***
Form of Accountant's Review Report***.37 The accountant's review report accompanying interim financial information should
consist of must include the title, "Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm."

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-80.37A If the accountant's review report is included in a filing with the SEC or anotherregulatory agency, the report must be addressed to the shareholders and the board of
directors, or equivalents for companies not organized as corporations. The accountant's
review report may include additional addressees.
.37B The first section of the accountant's review report must include the section title"Results of Review of Interim Financial Information" and the following elements:a. A title that includes the word independent.
a. The name of the company whose interim financial information was reviewed.
b. A statement that the interim financial information identified in the report wasreviewed.
cg. A statement about whether the accountant is aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial
information for it to conform with generally accepted accounting principles. The
statement should include an identification of the country of origin of thoseaccounting principles (for example, accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America or U.S. generally accepted accounting principles).
.37C The second section of the accountant's review report must include the section title"Basis for Review Results" and the following elements:ac. A statement that the interim financial information is the responsibility of theentity's management.
bd. A statement that the review of interim financial information was conducted inaccordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
ce. A description of the procedures for a review of interim financial information.
df. A statement that a review of interim financial information is substantially lessin scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB, the objective of which is an expression of an opinion regarding thefinancial statements taken as a whole, and accordingly, no such opinion isexpressed.
e. A statement that the auditor is a public accounting firm registered with the
PCAOB (United States) and is required to be independent with respect to thePCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-81

company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the SEC and the PCAOB.
.37D The accountant's review report must include the following elements:
ah. The manual or printed signature of the accountant's firm.24A
bi. The city and state (or city and country, in the case of non-U.S. auditors) fromwhich the accountant's review report has been issued.24AB
cj. The date of the review report. (Generally, the report should be dated as of thedate of completion of the review procedures.25)
In addition, each page of the interim financial information should be clearly marked as
unaudited.
24A

See SEC Rule 2-02(a) of Regulation S-X, 17 C.F.R. § 210.2-02(a).

24AB

Id.See SEC Rule 2-02(a) of Regulation S-X, 17 C.F.R. § 210.2-02(a).

.38 The following is an example of a review report:26
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Results of Review of Interim [Financial Information or Statements]
We have reviewed the accompanying [describe the interim financial information
or statements reviewed] of ABC Company (the "Company") and consolidated
subsidiaries as of September 30, 20X1, and for the three-month and nine-month
periods then ended, and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred
to as the "interim financial information or statements"). Based on our review, we
are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to theaccompanying interim financial information (statements) for it (them) to be inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica.
Basis for Review Results
This (These) interim financial information (statements) is (are) the responsibilityof the Company's management. We conducted our review in accordance with the

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-82

standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)("PCAOB"). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible forfinancial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.
[Signature][City and State or Country][Date].39 An accountant may be engaged to report on a review of comparative interim
financial information. The following is an example of a review report on a condensed
balance sheet as of March 31, 20X1, the related condensed statements of income andcash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 20X1 and 20X0, and acondensed balance sheet derived from audited financial statements as of December 31,
20X0, that were included in Form 10-Q. 27
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Results of Review of Interim [Financial Information or Statements]
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of ABC Company(the "Company") and subsidiaries as of March 31, 20X1, and the relatedcondensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the threemonth periods ended March 31, 20X1 and 20X0, and the related notes [andschedules] (collectively referred to as the "interim financial information orstatements"). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the condensed financial statements
referred to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB"), theconsolidated balance sheet of ABC the Company and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 20X0, and the related consolidated statements of income, retainedPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-83

earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in
our report dated February 15, 20X1, we expressed an unqualified opinion on
those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forthin the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
20X0, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidatedbalance sheet from which it has been derived.28
Basis for Review Results
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures andmaking inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with thestandards of the PCAOB Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, theobjective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
[Signature][City and State or Country][Date]
28

If the auditor's report on the preceding year-end financial statements was other thanunqualified, referred to other auditors, or included an explanatory paragraph because ofa going-concern matter or an inconsistency in the application of accounting principles,the last second paragraph of the illustrative report in paragraph .39 should beappropriately modified.
.40 The accountant may use and make reference to another accountant's review reporton the interim financial information of a significant component of a reporting entity. Thisreference indicates a division of responsibility for performing the review.29 The following
is an example of report including such a reference:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the shareholders and the board of directors of ABC Company
Results of Review of Interim [Financial Information or Statements]

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-84

We have reviewed the accompanying [describe the interim financial information
or statements reviewed] of ABC Company (the "Company") and consolidated
subsidiaries as of September 30, 20X1, and for the three-month and nine-month
periods then ended, and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred
to as the "interim financial information or statements"). Based on our review andthe report of other accountants, we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information(statements) for it (them) to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
We were furnished with the report of other accountants on their review of theinterim financial information of DEF subsidiary, whose total assets as of
September 30, 20X1, and whose revenues for the three-month and nine-month
periods then ended, constituted 15 percent, 20 percent, and 22 percent,respectively, of the related consolidated totals.
Basis for Review Results
This (These) interim financial information (statements) is (are) the responsibilityof the Company's management. We conducted our reviews in accordance withthe standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates) ("PCAOB"). A review of interim financial information (statements) consists
principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scopethan an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expressionof an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly,
we do not express such an opinion.
[Signature][City and State or Country][Date].41 The accountant's report on a review of interim financial information should be
modified for departures from generally accepted accounting principles,30 which include
inadequate disclosure and changes in accounting principle that are not in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. The existence of substantial doubt about
the entity's ability to continue as a going concern or a lack of consistency in theapplication of accounting principles affecting the interim financial information would not

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-85

require the accountant to add an additional paragraph to the report, provided that theinterim financial information appropriately discloses such matters. Although notrequired, the accountant may wish to emphasize such matters in a separate explanatory
paragraph of the report. See paragraphs .44 and .45 of this section for examples ofparagraphs that address matters related to an entity's ability to continue as a going
concern.
30

If the circumstances contemplated by Rule 203, Accounting Principles, are present,
the accountant should refer to the guidance in paragraph .15 of AS 3101, Reports on
Audited Financial Statements.
.42 Departure from generally accepted accounting principles. If the accountant becomesaware that the interim financial information is materially affected by a departure fromgenerally accepted accounting principles, he or she should modify the report. The
modification should describe the nature of the departure and, if practicable, should state
the effects on the interim financial information. Following is an example of such a
modification of the accountant's report.
[Concluding paragraph]
Based on our review, with the exception of the matter(s) described in thepreceding following paragraph(s), we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information(statements) for it (them) to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
[Explanatory third paragraph]
Based on information furnished to us by management, we believe that thecompany has excluded from property and debt in the accompanying balance
sheet certain lease obligations that we believe should be capitalized to conformwith accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
This information indicates that if these lease obligations were capitalized at
September 30, 20X1, property would be increased by $______, long-term debt
by $______, and net income and earnings per share would be increased(decreased) by $________, $_________, $________, and $________,
respectively, for the three-month and nine-month periods then ended.
***.43 Inadequate disclosure. The information necessary for adequate disclosure is
influenced by the form and context in which the interim financial information is

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-86

presented. For example, the disclosures considered necessary for interim financial
information presented in accordance with the minimum disclosure requirements of APB
Opinion No. 28, paragraph 30, which is applicable to summarized financial statementsof public companies, are considerably less extensive than those necessary for annual
financial statements that present financial position, results of operations, and cash flows
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.31 If information that theaccountant believes is necessary for adequate disclosure in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles32 is not included in the interim financial information, theaccountant should modify the report and, if practicable, include the necessary
information in the report. The following is an example of such a modification of theaccountant's report:[Concluding paragraph]
Based on our review, with the exception of the matter(s) described in thepreceding following paragraph(s), we are not aware of any material modifications
that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information(statements) for it (them) to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
[Explanatory third paragraph]
Management has informed us that the company is presently contesting
deficiencies in federal income taxes proposed by the Internal Revenue Service
for the years 20X1 through 20X3 in the aggregate amount of approximately$_____, and that the extent of the company's liability, if any, and the effect on theaccompanying information (statements) is not determinable at this time. The
information (statements) fail(s) to disclose these matters, which we believe are
required to be disclosed in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
.44 Going-concern paragraph was included in the prior year's audit report; conditions
giving rise to the paragraph continue to exist. If (a) the auditor's report for the prior year
end contained an explanatory paragraph indicating the existence of substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern, (b) the conditions that raisedsuch doubt continued to exist as of the interim reporting date covered by the review,and (c) there is adequate and appropriate disclosure about these conditions in theinterim financial information, the accountant is not required to modify his or her report.
However, the accountant may add an explanatory paragraph to the review report, after
the concluding paragraph, including an appropriate title (immediately following theparagraph describing the results of the review), emphasizing the matter disclosed in the

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-87

audited financial statements and the interim financial information. The following is an
example of such a paragraph.
[Appropriate Title]
Note 4 of the Company's audited financial statements as of December 31, 20X1,
and for the year then ended discloses that the Company was unable to renew its
line of credit or obtain alternative financing at December 31, 20X1. Our auditor'sreport on those financial statements includes an explanatory paragraph referringto the matters in Note 4 of those financial statements and indicating that thesematters raised substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as agoing concern. As indicated in Note 3 of the Company's unaudited interim
financial statements as of March 31, 20X2, and for the three months then ended,
the Company was still unable to renew its line of credit or obtain alternative
financing as of March 31, 20X2. The accompanying interim financial information
does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of thisuncertainty.
.45 Going-concern paragraph was not included in the prior year's audit report;
conditions or events exist as of the interim reporting date covered by the review thatmight be indicative of the entity's possible inability to continue as a going concern. If (a)conditions or events exist as of the interim reporting date covered by the review thatmight be indicative of the entity's possible inability to continue as a going concern, and(b) there is adequate and appropriate disclosure about these conditions or events in theinterim financial information, the accountant is not required to modify his or her report.
However, the accountant may add an explanatory paragraph to the review report, after
the concluding paragraph, including an appropriate title (immediately following theparagraph describing the results of the review), emphasizing the matter disclosed in theinterim financial information. The following is an example of such a paragraph.
[Appropriate Title]
As indicated in Note 3, certain conditions indicate that the Company may beunable to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial
information does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcomeof this uncertainty.
***.50 The auditor ordinarily need not modify his or her report on the audited financial
statements to refer to his or her having performed a review in accordance with thisPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-88

section or to refer to the interim financial information accompanying the audited financial
statements because the interim financial information has not been audited and is not
required for the audited financial statements to be fairly stated in conformity withgenerally accepted accounting principles. The auditor's report on the audited financial
statements should, however, be modified in the following circumstances:***c. The selected quarterly financial data required by item 302(a) of Regulation S-K isomitted. The auditor should add an explanatory paragraph, including an appropriate
title, to the report, The following is an example of a paragraph that should be added tothe auditor's report if the selected quarterly financial data required by item 302(a) isomitted. The following is an example of such a paragraph.
[Appropriate Title]
The company has not presented the selected quarterly financial data specified initem 302(a) of Regulation S-K that the Securities and Exchange Commission
requires as supplementary information to the basic financial statements.
d. The selected quarterly financial data required by item 302(a) of Regulation S-K has
not been reviewed. The auditor should add an explanatory paragraph, including anappropriate title, to the report, The following is an example of a paragraph that should
be added to the auditor's report if the selected quarterly financial data required by item
302(a) has not been reviewed. The following is an example of such a paragraph.
[Appropriate Title]
The selected quarterly financial data on page xx contains information that we did
not audit, and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion on that data. We
attempted but were unable to review the quarterly data in accordance with thestandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board because webelieve that the company's internal control for the preparation of interim financial
information does not provide an adequate basis to enable us to complete such a
review.
***
AS 6101, Letters for Underwriters and Certain Other Requesting Parties***PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-89.27 When the report on the audited financial statements and financial statement
schedules included (incorporated by reference) in the registration statement departs
from the standard report includes one or more explanatory paragraphs or a paragraphto emphasize a matter regarding the financial statements, for instance, where one ormore explanatory paragraphs or a paragraph to emphasize a matter regarding thefinancial statements have been added to the report, the accountants should refer18 tothat fact in the comfort letter and discuss the subject matter of the paragraph.19 In thoserare instances in which the SEC accepts a qualified opinion on historical financial
statements, the accountants should refer to the qualification in the opening paragraph ofthe comfort letter and discuss the subject matter of the qualification. (See also
paragraph .35f.)***.30 An underwriter may also request that the accountants comment in their comfort
letter on (a) unaudited interim financial information required by item 302(a) ofRegulation S-K, to which AS 4105 pertains or (b) required supplementary information, towhich AS 2705 pertains. AS 4105 and AS 2705 provide that the accountants should
expand the standard auditor's unqualified report on the audited financial statements torefer to such information when the scope of their procedures with regard to theinformation was restricted or when the information appears not to be presented inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles or, for required supplementary
information, applicable guidelines. Such expansions of the accountants' standard
auditor's unqualified report in the registration statement would ordinarily be referred to in
the opening paragraph of the comfort letter (see also paragraph .35f). Additionalcomments on such unaudited information are therefore unnecessary. However, if theunderwriter requests that the accountants perform procedures with regard to suchinformation in addition to those performed in connection with their review or audit asprescribed by AS 4105 and AS 2705, the accountants may do so and report theirfindings.
***
.35
***
f.
When the report on the audited financial statements and financial
statement schedules in the registration statement departs from the auditor's
standard unqualified report, and the comfort letter includes negative assurancewith respect to subsequent unaudited condensed interim financial information

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-90

included (incorporated by reference) in the registration statement or with respect
to an absence of specified subsequent changes, increases, or decreases, theaccountant should consider the effect thereon of the subject matter of thequalification, explanatory paragraph(s), or paragraph(s) emphasizing a matter
regarding the financial statements. The accountant should also follow theguidance in paragraph .27. An illustration of how this type of situation may be
dealt with is shown in example I [paragraph .64].
***
III.

Amendments to Auditing Interpretations

AI 11, Using the Work of a Specialist: Auditing Interpretations of AS 1210***
.21 Interpretation—When other relevant evidential matter exists, the auditor should
consider it before reaching a conclusion about the appropriateness of management’s
accounting for a transfer.14 However, since the isolation aspect of surrender of control isassessed primarily from a legal perspective, the auditor usually will not be able to obtain
persuasive evidence in a form other than a legal opinion. In the absence of persuasive
evidence that a transfer has met the isolation criterion, derecognition of the transferredassets is not in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and the auditor
should consider the need to express a qualified or adverse opinion in accordance withparagraphs .1835 through .4360 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances. However, if
permission for the auditor to use a legal opinion that he or she deems otherwise
adequate is not granted, this would be a scope limitation and the auditor should
consider the need to express a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion in accordancewith AS 31051.0522–.0926 and AS 31051.4461–.4763.
***
AI 16, Auditing Accounting Estimates: Auditing Interpretations of AS 2501***
.03 Required Information Presented—When an entity discloses in its basic financial
statements only information required by FASB Statement No. 107, the auditor may
issue an standard unqualified opinion (assuming no other report modifications arenecessary). The auditor may add an emphasis-of-matter paragraph describing thenature and possible range of such fair value information especially when management's

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-91

best estimate of value is used in the absence of quoted market values (FASB Statement
No. 107, paragraph 11 [AC section F25.115D]) and the range of possible values issignificant (see paragraph .19 of AS 3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial
Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion). If the entity has notdisclosed required fair value information, the auditor should evaluate whether thefinancial statements are materially affected by the departure from generally accepted
accounting principles.
***
AI 17, Inquiry of a Client's Lawyer Concerning Litigation, Claims, andAssessments: Auditing Interpretations of AS 2505***
.23 If the auditor is uncertain as to the meaning of the lawyer's evaluation, he should
request clarification either in a follow-up letter or a conference with the lawyer andclient, appropriately documented. If the lawyer is still unable to give an unequivocal
evaluation of the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in writing or orally, the auditor
should look to the guidance in paragraphs .2845 through .3249 of AS 31051, Reports
on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances, to determine the effect, if any, of the lawyer's response on
the auditor's report.
***
AI 20: Other Information in Documents Containing Audited Financial Statements:
Auditing Interpretations of AS 2710***
.08 Interpretation—If the auditor has been engaged to examine and report on
management's assertion, the guidance in AT section 501, Reporting on an Entity's
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, should be followed perform an auditof management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, the auditor should follow the requirement of AS 2201, An Audit of Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial
Statements.
.09 If the auditor has not been engaged to perform an audit of management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting examine andreport on management's assertion, the auditor should follow the requirements in AS

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-92

3105.59-60. guidance in AS 2710, which states that "the auditor has no obligation to
perform any procedures to corroborate other information contained in [such] a
document." Under AS 2710, the auditor is required to read the report by management
and consider whether it is materially inconsistent with information appearing in thefinancial statements and, as a result, he or she may become aware of a material
misstatement of fact.5
5Unless information on internal control over financial reporting appears in the financial
statements, which is not common, a management assertion on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting could not be inconsistent with information
appearing in financial statements.
.10 Although not required, the auditor may consider adding the following paragraph tothe standard auditor's report: "We were not engaged to examine management's
assertion about the effectiveness of [name of entity's] internal control over financial
reporting as of [date] included in the accompanying [title of management's report] and,accordingly, we do not express an opinion thereon."***
AI 23, Reports on Audited Financial Statements: Auditing Interpretations of AS
3101 Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances:
Auditing Interpretations of AS 31051***.01 Question— Paragraph .0724 of AS 31051, Reports on Audited Financial Statements
Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances, states that
"Common restrictions on the scope of the audit include those applying to theobservation of physical inventories and the confirmation of accounts receivable by directcommunication with debtors. . . ." A footnote to that paragraph states: "Circumstancessuch as the timing of the work may make it impossible for the auditor to accomplishthese procedures. In this case, if the auditor is able to satisfy himself or herself as toinventories or accounts receivable by applying alternative procedures, there is no
significant limitation on the scope of the work, and the report need not include reference
to the omission of the procedures or to the use of alternative procedures." Outside firmsof nonaccountants specializing in the taking of physical inventories are used at times bysome companies, such as retail stores, hospitals, and automobile dealers, to count, list,
price and subsequently compute the total dollar amount of inventory on hand at the dateof the physical count. Would obtaining the report of an outside inventory-taking firm be

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-93

an acceptable alternative procedure to the independent auditor's own observation ofphysical inventories?
***.36 Examples of An example of the Opinion on the Financial Statements and the Basisfor Opinion sections of an auditor's reports on single year financial statements in theyear of adoption of liquidation basis follows:1A with such an explanatory paragraphfollow.
Report on Single Year Financial Statements in Year of Adoption of Liquidation
Basis
Opinion on the Financial Statements"We have audited the statement of net assets in liquidation of XYZ Company (the"Company") as of December 31, 20X2, and the related statement of changes in
net assets in liquidation for the period from April 26, 20X2 to December 31,
20X2., In addition, we have and audited the statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 20X2 to April 25, 20X2,
and the related notes [and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial
statements"). "In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation of XYZ the Company
as of December 31, 20X2, the changes in its net assets in liquidation for theperiod from April 26, 20X2 to December 31, 20X2, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the period from January 1, 20X2 to April 25,
20X2, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the UnitedStates of America applied on the bases described below. in the preceding
paragraph.""As described in Note X to the financial statements, the stockholders of XYZ the
Company approved a plan of liquidation on April 25, 20X2, and the Company
commenced liquidation shortly thereafter. As a result, the Company has changed
its basis of accounting for periods subsequent to April 25, 20X2 from the goingconcern basis to a liquidation basis.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements basedon our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-94

independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities andExchange Commission and the PCAOB.
"We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. Our An audit includeds performing procedures to assess the riskof material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An Our audit also includeds
assessing evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of thefinancial statements presentation. We believe that our audit provides areasonable basis for our opinion.
1A

The auditor's report must include the same basic elements and communication ofcritical audit matters as would be required in an unqualified auditor's report under AS
3101, The Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor
Expresses an Unqualified Opinion.
Report on Comparative Financial Statements in Year of Adoption of Liquidation
Basis An example of the Opinion on the Financial Statements and the Basis for
Opinion sections of an auditor's report on comparative financial statements in theyear of adoption of liquidation basis follows:1B
Opinion on the Financial Statements"We have audited the balance sheet of XYZ Company (the "Company") as ofDecember 31, 20X1, the related statements of income, retained earnings, andcash flows for the year then ended, and the statements of income, retained
earnings, and cash flows for the period from January 1, 20X2 to April 25, 20X2,
and. In addition, we have audited the statement of net assets in liquidation as ofDecember 31, 20X2, and the related statement of changes in net assets inliquidation for the period from April 26, 20X2 to December 31, 20X2, and therelated notes [and schedules] (collectively referred to as the "financial
statements"). "In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of XYZ the Company as ofDecember 31, 20X1, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the yearPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-95

then ended and for the period from January 1, 20X2 to April 25, 20X2, its net
assets in liquidation as of December 31, 20X2, and the changes in its net assets
in liquidation for the period from April 26, 20X2 to December 31, 20X2, inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ofAmerica applied on the bases described below. in the preceding paragraph.""As described in Note X to the financial statements, the stockholders of XYZ the
Company approved a plan of liquidation on April 25, 20X2, and the Company
commenced liquidation shortly thereafter. As a result, the Company has changed
its basis of accounting for periods subsequent to April 25, 20X2 from the goingconcern basis to a liquidation basis.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements basedon our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
"We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards requirethat we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. Our An audits includeds performing procedures to assess therisk of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An Our audits also includeds
assessing evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of thefinancial statements presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
1B

Id.

***
12. Reference in Auditor's Standard Unqualified Report to Management's ReportPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-96.51 Question—One of the basic elements of the auditor's standard unqualified report isa statement that the financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. That statement is required in the auditor's report even when a document
containing the auditor's report includes a statement by management regarding its
responsibility for the presentation of the financial statements. When an annual
shareholders' report (or other client-prepared document that includes audited financial
statements) contains a management report that states the financial statements are theresponsibility of management, is it permissible for the auditor's report to include areference to the management report?
.52 Interpretation—No. The statement about management's responsibilities for thefinancial statements required by AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements The
Auditor's Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an
Unqualified Opinion, should not be further elaborated upon in the auditor's standard
unqualified report or referenced to management's report. Such modifications to thestandard auditor's unqualified report may lead users to erroneously believe that theauditor is providing assurances about representations made by management about their
responsibility for financial reporting, internal controls and other matters that might bediscussed in the management report.
***
14. Reporting on Audits Conducted in Accordance with the Standards of the
PCAOB and in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing***.56 Question—AS 3101 requires states that a basic element of the auditor’s report is astatement that the audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB
and an identification of the United States of America as the country of origin of thosestandards. If the auditor conducts the audit in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB and in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing promulgated by
the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Practices Committee of theInternational Federation of Accountants, may the auditor so indicate in the auditor’sreport?
.57 Interpretation—Yes. AS 3101 requires that the auditor indicate in the auditor’s reportthat the audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and an
identification of the United States of America as the country of origin of those standards;
however, AS 3101 does not prohibit the auditor from indicating that the audit also wasconducted in accordance with another set of auditing standards. If the audit also wasPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-97

conducted in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing, in their entirety,
the auditor may so indicate in the auditor’s report. To determine whether an audit was
conducted in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing, it is necessary toconsider the text of the International Standards on Auditing in their entirety, including
the basic principles and essential procedures together with the related guidance
included in the International Standards on Auditing.
***.59 An example of reporting on an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of
the PCAOB and in accordance with International Standards on Auditing follows:
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements
based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the
U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and in accordance with
International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. An
Our audit includeds performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, andperforming procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included
examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding supporting the amounts anddisclosures in the financial statements. An Our audit also includeds evaluatingassessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made bymanagement, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentationof the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
***.61 Interpretation—If the prior-period audited financial statements are unchanged,
pursuant to AS 31051.5874 the successor auditor should indicate in the introductoryPCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-98

paragraph Opinion on the Financial Statements section of his or her report (a) that thefinancial statements of the prior period were audited by another auditor, (b) the date of
the predecessor auditor's report, (c) the type of report issued by the predecessor
auditor, and (d) if the report was other than a standard an auditor's unqualified report,
the substantive reasons therefor. The successor auditor ordinarily also should indicatethat the other auditor has ceased operations. Footnote 1829 of AS 31051 indicates thatthe successor auditor should not name the predecessor auditor in the report. An
example of the reference that would be added to the introductory paragraph Opinion on
the Financial Statements section of the successor auditor's report is presented asfollows:
The financial statements of ABC Company as of December 31, 20X1, and for theyear then ended were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations.
Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements intheir report dated March 31, 20X2.
A reference to the predecessor auditor's report should be included even if thepredecessor auditor's report on the prior-period financial statements is reprinted andaccompanies the successor auditor's report, because reprinting does not constitutereissuance of the predecessor auditor’s report.
***.63 When the prior-period financial statements have been restated, the successor
auditor may be engaged either to reaudit the prior-period financial statements or to audit
only the restatement adjustments. If the successor auditor is engaged to audit only therestatement adjustments and applies sufficient procedures to satisfy himself or herself
as to the appropriateness of the restatement adjustments, the successor auditor may
report on the restatement adjustments using the guidance in AS 31051.5874. (Theauditor also may use the guidance on alternative language contained in paragraph .71,
below.) In determining the nature, timing and extent of procedures, the successor
auditor should consider that a predecessor auditor who has ceased operations cannot
perform the procedures to evaluate the appropriateness of the restatement adjustments
as described in AS 2905, Subsequent Discovery of Facts Existing at the Date of the
Auditor's Report.
***.71 If the successor auditor is engaged to audit only the restatement adjustments andapplies sufficient procedures to satisfy himself or herself as to the appropriateness of
the restatement adjustments, the successor auditor may report on the restatement

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-99

adjustments using the guidance in AS 31051.5874. Alternatively, the successor auditor
may wish to make it clear that he or she did not audit, review, or apply other proceduresto the prior-period financial statements beyond the procedures applied to therestatement adjustments. Accordingly, he or she may include the following paragraph in
his or her report:***.74 Question—If the prior-period financial statements audited by a predecessor auditor
who has ceased operations have been subsequently restated, but the successor auditor
has not yet completed an audit of current-period financial statements, can the successor
auditor report on the restatement adjustments pursuant to 31051.5874?
.75 Interpretation—No. AS 31051.5874 is only applicable when the prior-period financial
statements are presented for comparative purposes with current-period audited financial
statements. If the prior-period financial statements have been restated, and thesuccessor auditor is requested to report on those financial statements without also
reporting on current-period audited financial statements, the successor auditor would
need to reaudit the prior-period financial statements in order to report on them.
***
AI 24, Special Reports: Auditing Interpretations of AS 3305***
10

Generally accepted accounting principles require the use of current-value accounting
for financial statements of certain types of entities (for example, investment companies,
employee benefit plans, personal financial statements, and mutual and common trust
funds). This interpretation does not apply to reports on current-value financial
statements of such entities. The auditor engaged to report on current-value financial
statements of such entities should follow the guidance in AS 31051, Reports on Audited
Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting
Circumstances.
***.83 Interpretation—No. An offering memorandum generally is a document providing
information as the basis for negotiating an offer to sell certain assets or businesses or toraise funds. Normally, parties to an agreement or other specified parties for whom thespecial-purpose financial presentation is intended have not been identified. Accordingly,

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-100

the auditor should follow the reporting guidance in AS 31051.1835–.2744 and .4058–.4360.
***.86 If there is no such agreement, the auditor should follow the guidance in AS
31051.1835–.2744 and .4058–.4360.
***
AI 25, Association with Financial Statements: Auditing Interpretations of AS 3320***
.15 Question—Paragraph .01.04 of AS 3101, Reports on Audited Financial Statements,
AS 3320, Association with Financial Statements, states in part: "In all cases where an
auditor's name is associated with financial statements, the report should contain a clearcut indication of the character of the auditor's work, if any, and the degree of
responsibility the auditor is taking." Paragraph .03 of AS 3320.03, Association withFinancial Statements, states that "An accountant is associated with financial statements
when he has consented to the use of his name in a report, document, or written
communication containing the statements." Is the auditor "associated" with condensed
financial data when he is identified by a financial reporting service as being a company's
independent auditor or when his report is reproduced and presented with such data?
***
AI 28, Evidential Matter Relating to Income Tax Accruals: Auditing Interpretations***.10 Auditing standards require the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate evidential
matter through, among other things, inspection and inquiries to afford a reasonablebasis for an opinion on the financial statements. Paragraph .35 of AS 2810, Evaluating
Audit Results, requires the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate evidential matter
about assertions in the financial statements of material significance or else to qualify ordisclaim his or her opinion on the statements. Paragraph .0724 of AS 31051, Reports
on Audited Financial Statements Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other
Reporting Circumstances, states that, "When restrictions that significantly limit thescope of the audit are imposed by the client, ordinarily the auditor should disclaim an
opinion on the financial statements." Also, AS 2805, Management Representations,requires the auditor to obtain written representations from management. AS 2805.06

PCAOB Release No. 2017-001
June 1, 2017
Appendix 2—Amendments
Page A2-101

states that specific representations should relate to the following matters, "availability of
all financial records and related data," and AS 2805.08 states that a materiality limit
does not apply to that representation. AS 2805.13 states that "management's refusal tofurnish a written representation" constitutes a limitation on the scope of the audit
sufficient to preclude an unqualified opinion.
***