Geographical Study of the Disaster in Japan andthe activities of "Commission of Disaster Responses” ofthe Association of Japanese Geographers
Japan is subject to suffer disasters due to its natural condition. Until the 1970s, therelationship between flood and the geomorphological condition was studied andthe results were applied to hazard mapping. After the 1980s, landslide and debris
flow, earthquake, and volcanic activity became the main problem of the disasterprevention. After the Great Hanshin Awaji Earthquake Disaster of 1995, thegeographical studies on earthquake disaster increased. The Association of Japanese
Geographers (AJG) established the Commission of Disaster Responses in 2001, andit holds symposium on disasters from the geographical viewpoint every year in thegeneral meeting of the AJG. The mapping of the tsunami stricken area of the Great
East Japan Earthquake Disaster of 2011 was carried out by a special team of theAssociation of Japanese Geographers. The study on disaster is conducted now in thefield of physical geography and the human geography. The role of the Japanesegeographers becomes very important in a world disaster study.

Geographical Characteristics and Natural Disaster ofJapanSince the Japanese Islands (Fig. 1) are situated along the convergent boundaries offour plates (Pacific, North American, Eurasian, and Philippine Sea plates), they are
tectonically very active. Earthquakes occur frequently (Fig. 2), and there are many
active volcanoes. Uplift rate of mountain area is very high. Therefore, the mountainslope is steep and is geologically open to collapse, and the river gradient is steep ingeneral.
Japan is located in the Asian monsoon zone and has high annual precipitation(1500mm on average, up to over 4000mm). Tropical cyclones (typhoons) and/orbaiu (early summer rain) sometimes lead to torrential rainfall.
While area of alluvial plains underlain by thick unconsolidated sediment account for
only 25% of whole Japan, they contain approximately 80% of population. Owing tosuch geographical characteristics, various natural disasters have occurred in Japan.

Fig. 1 Satellite image of the Japanese Islands
http://www.sapc.jaxa.jp/gallery/cat01/detail/D-0865_pl.html

Fig. 2 Main active faults in and around Japan and major
earthquakes occurred after 1995 (modified after The
Research Group for Active Faults of Japan, 1980). KK:
Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear plant. 1F: Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear plant. Suzuki (2013).

Outline of the History of Disaster Studies by theJapanese Geographers
After World War II, the damage of the typhoon was heavy until the 1950s. TheTyphoon Kathleen of 1947 (more than 1,900 dead or missing) brought the floodingof rivers widely and inundated a part of Tokyo. The relationship between themicro-landform distribution of plains and the flooding situation was investigated(Ogasawara 1947). This was the first geomorphological disaster study by using airphotos in Japan. In 1958, studies on the floods and debris flow disasters of
Kanogawa Typhoon (Typhoon Ida), by which more than 1,200 people were killed or
missing, were done from both physical and human geographical viewpoints. The
resulting papers were published in a special issue of the Geographical Review ofJapan (AJG 1960)(Fig. 3).
Isewan Typhoon (Typhoon Vera) of 1959 brought the biggest damage caused byflood in Japanese modern history (Fig. 4). More than 5,000 people were killed or
missing by it. The main damaging phenomenon was the high tide invading into
Nagoya city and its surroundings, southern part of Nobi Plain. Three years before
the disaster, geographer OYA Masahiko made a 1:50,000 geomorphological map on
Nobi Plain (Oya 1956)(Fig. 5). The damage area was in accordance with the map
which was based on geomorphic features. After this, it became well-known that thegeomorphological mapping is effective for understanding the flood risks, and theGeographical Survey Institute (present name: the Geospatial Information Authorityof Japan; GSI) of the government started a project to prepare the "1:25,000 Land
Condition Maps,” which show geomorphic feature and facilities for disastermeasures of the plain area in 1960 (Fig. 6).
After the 1960s the occurrence of broad flood decreased as the river improvement
facilities of big rivers advanced. In 1982, extraordinary heavy rain hit Nagasaki city.
It caused a lot of landslides, debris flows, and flooding of small rivers resulting
approximately 300 deaths of residential people. It indicated that small-scale
flooding and debris flow in populated area became the big problem (Koike 2001).
1980s is also the period when studies of the debris flow mechanism based on theobservation was advanced (Suwa 1988, Fujita et al. 1989., etc.).
It is notable that the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster
Prevention (NIED) has been preparing 1:50,000 “Landslide Distribution Maps” using
air photos since the beginning of the 1980s1.
Since the 1980s, the risks of potential earthquake and volcanic activity have been
also recognized broadly. Both plate boundary and intraplate active fault are themajor origin of great earthquakes in Japan. Typical examples are the 1923 Kanto
Earthquake (the Great Kanto Earthquake Disaster; more than 100,000 people werekilled) and the 1995 Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake (Hanshin Awaji Great
Earthquake Disaster; more than 6,400 people were killed), respectively.
Geographical studies on the damage by ground motion and its secondary
phenomena (soil liquefaction, landslide, deformation and flow of fill-ground, etc.)
have been performed through the experience of repeated earthquakes. It became
clear that the soil liquefaction as well as the strong motion is affected bygeomorphic condition through 1964 Niigata Earthquake and the 1983 Central Partof Japan Sea Earthquake, both of which occurred along the eastern Japan Sea. Oyaet al. (1982) made a 1:50,000 geomorphological map indicating the risk ofliquefaction, and the real liquefaction distribution of the 1983 Central Part of Japan
Sea Earthquake was in accordance with the map. Since then, geomorphologicalearthquake hazard map came to be made by local governments.

Fig. 3 Papers in a special issue of the Geographical
Review of Japan published in 1960

Fig. 4 Air photo along the coast of Ise Bay after
Isewan Typhoon of 1959
The photo was taken by GSI

Fig. 5 Geomorphologic landform classification map of theNobi Plain, central Japan (Oya, 1956)

Fig. 6 Land condition map of ”Kyoto” published by GSI
http://www.gsi.go.jp/bousaichiri/lc_index.html

http://dil.bosai.go.jp/disaster/1959isewan/material/images/fuzu/fu
zu_013.jpg

Table 1 Major hazard mapping projects promoted by the government
ScaleOrganization

Tochi Joken Zu (Land Condition Map)

Map name

1:25,000

GSI

1963-

Chisui Chikei Bunrui Zu (Geomorphological Map for Prediction of Flooding)

1:25,000

GSI

1976-78, 2007-

Kozui Hazard Mappu (Flood Hazard Map)

Years of project

1:10,000-1:15,000

Municipalities

1994-

Jisuberi Chikei Bunpu Zu (Landslide Disaster Map)

1:50,000

NIED

1982-

Kazan Bosai Mappu (Volcano Hazard Map)

indefinite

Municipalities

1992-

Toshiken Katsudanso Zu (Active Fault Map in Urban Area)

1:25,000

GSI

1995-

Yureyasusa Mappu (Earthquake Disaster Hazard Map)

indefinite

Municipalities

2005-

GSI: Geospatial Information Authority of Japan
NIED: National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention

As for the volcano disaster, Geographers contributed the study of mass movements
accompanied the 1977-1982 volcanism of Mt. Usu (e.g., Kadomura et al. 1983).
Human response was also studied (Kadomura et al. 1978) (Fig. 7). Eruption ofTokachidake of 1988 accompanying a small lahar was an opportunity to start
making the hazard maps of volcanic region by local governments.
In 1993, the "International Congress on Geomorphological Hazards in Asia-PacificRegion" was held in Tokyo organized by the Working Group on Natural Hazards andEnvironmental Geomorphology, AJG and Working Group on Rapid
Geomorphological Hazards (chaired by Oya), IGU, and 27 papers were presented.
Eleven papers of 14 Japanese researchers' papers are placed in GeoJournal (KluwerAcademic Publishers 1996) (Fig. 8).
The 1995 Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake caused by an intraplate fault
activity hit Kobe city and its surroundings, one of the highly-urbanized areas inJapan (Figs 9 and 10). Before the earthquake, geomorphologists and geologists had
made an active fault catalog in Japan (Research Group for Active Faults of Japan
1980, 1991) and it paid considerable attention to the occurrence of the earthquake.
After the earthquake, the government established the Headquarters for Earthquake
Research Promotion (HERP). The "National Seismic Hazard Map," which shows theprobability of great earthquake motion, has been open to public by HERP. 2 Many
tectonic geomorphologists cooperated with this project (Ota and Okumura 1999,Kumaki 1999).
As to the earthquake, a group led by geographer USUI Teruko of Nara University
worked on stricken area support using GIS. The value of GIS became widely
recognizable, and it was the big opportunity to develop GIS studies. In addition,
geographical studies of the disaster on physical side and social and economic side
were conducted, and a special issue of the Geographical Review of Japan waspublished (AJG 1996).
Table 1 shows the major mapping projects that the government promotes. Thetransition of number of the articles (Table 2) also shows such history. Studies ondisaster have been increased since 1995. There were few studies from the field of
human geography before 19953, but recently studies on disaster by humangeographers are not a few. In recent years Japanese geographers (HARUYAMA
Shigeko, UMITSU Masatomo, etc.) study the disasters of foreign countries,
especially Southeast Asia.

Fig. 7 Oblique view of Mt. Usu(Kadomura et al., 1983). Photo by
Kokusai Kogyo, 1981.

Fig. 8 Brief report of the International
Congress on Geomorphological Hazards
in the Asia-Pacific Region (GeoJournal,38.3)

Fig. 10 Disasters caused by the 1995
Southern Hyogo PrefectureEarthquake. (a) Fire in Kobe city (by I.
Kobayashi). (b) Slope failure (by T.
Kuroki, and (c) Damaged express
highway (by T. Kuroki).
Fig. 9 Active fault map of the urban area of Kobe (presented byGeospatial Information Authority of Japan)
Table 2 The number of articles of the disaster study by Japanesegeographers of three major geographic journals*

Disaster Responses of the Association of JapaneseGeographers after 2001
The study of the disaster is the field where geography can contribute to the society
directly. It has been thought that the study of the disaster occupied the important
position for Japanese geography of the 21st century. Therefore, "Commission ofDisaster Responses" was established in the AJG in 2001. The main purposes of thecommission are to coordinate geographers' survey and study and to share
information when disasters occur, and to contribute society by issuing results of thegeography studies. It was chaired by ENDO Kunihiko (2001-2008) and HIRAI Yukihiro(2008-2012). The present chairperson is KUMAKI Yohta.
The commission held an open symposium in every spring meeting and someautumn meetings of the AJG since 2003 (Fig. 11). Through these symposia thecommission announced present results of the disaster studies and their importanceto Japanese geographers, and submitted a point of issue how geographers
contribute to solve the social problem.
On March 11, 2011 the off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake occurred (Fig.
12). It caused a huge tsunami and more than 19,000 people were dead or missing.
This catastrophic disaster including an accident of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Station is called the Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster. The AJG copedwith the disaster by the special system. The headquarters for disaster response was
set up and YAGASAKI Noritaka, the chairperson of the executive committee of AJG,
took office as the general manager. It performed liaison with other academicsocieties, information dispatch through website5, etc. until April, 2012.
One of the very notable activities of the headquarters was the 1:25,000 mapping ofa tsunami stricken area (Figs. 13 and 14). It started immediately after taking air
photos by the GSI and a result map of the first version was uploaded on March 29.
This activity was carried out by a great cooperation of geomorphologists who getused to treating air photos and geographers specializing in GIS. The map wasupdated several times to improve the accuracy. The latest version4 was uploaded in
December 11, 2011. This activity was highly appreciated because the importantdata opened to public quickly when a field survey was not easy.
Separately from the activity of the headquarters, some geographers investigate theradiation dose distribution6.

The Future Prospects
Geography has contributed to disaster prevention measures mainly in a field of thehazard mapping. Geomorphologists have played a large role. However, the disasterstudy should be based on wide field of geography. As to the Great East Japan
Earthquake Disaster of 2011, various studies including social or economic
geography have been performed, e.g., radioactive contamination, land use planningfor revival of the stricken area, the community maintenance of inhabitants, andinfluence on circulation of supplies. This should not be ended as a temporaryphenomenon. The disaster raised the recognition of the people of the rare andextraordinary big disasters. A natural disaster is a phenomenon that nature has an
influence on the human society. Geography is science elucidating area properties byboth physical and human sides. The geographical disaster studies, therefore, should
be applied to the real society and it is necessary to send its result to the society
widely. The development of geographical information science will support it.
Japan has many observation data and historical materials of disasters, and disasterstudies in various sciences including geography have achieved much result.
Probably the most of the result will be applicable to the world, especially Asia andPacific regions. The Japanese geographers must promote a study for reduction ofthe disaster under the cooperation with the foreign scientists.

(HumanGeography)

Years

GeneralEarthquake

Flood

VolcanoTotal

1980-1984

-

1

1

13

1985-1989

-

14-

5(-)

1990-1994

1

1

4

1

7(1)

1995-1999

-

17

3

1

21(4)

2000-2004

1

2

1

1

5(9)

2005-2009

-

75-

12(4)

2010-2012

147-

12(4)

(-)

* Geographical Review of Japan of the Association of Japanese Geographers
Japanese Journal of Human Geography of the Human Geographical Society of Japan
Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi) of the Tokyo Geographical Society

Fig. 13 Map of the area hit by thetsunami of 11 March 2011
mapped by Tsunami Damage
Mapping Team, The Headquarters
for Disaster Response, AJG.
Fig. 11 Poster announcing symposium heldby the Commission of Disaster Responses,
AJG

Fig. 12 Disasters caused by the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Fig. 14 (a) Tsunami inundation area of the Sendai coastal
Tohoku Earthquake. (a) Natori city located at the Sendai
plain. (b) Land condition map of the area. Sugito et al. (2012).
coastal plain (by K. Hori). (b) Onagawa town located at ria
coast (by S. Ishiguro), (c) Vessel beached on the shore (by C.
Oguchi) (d) Liquefaction at a park of Tochigi city located far
from the epicenter (by Tochigi city employee).
Notes
1.http://lsweb1.ess.bosai.go.jp/en/index.html (last accessed 12 June 2013)
2.http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/index-e.html; http://www.j-shis.bosai.go.jp/en/ (last accessed 12 June 2013)
3.Nakabayashi Itsuki is one of a few geographers who has been studying the disaster in a field in conjunction with the city planning from the 1970s(Nakabayashi 1990 etc.).
4.http://www.ajg.or.jp/disaster/201103_Tohoku-eq.html (last accessed 12 June 2013)5http://danso.env.nagoya-u.ac.jp/20110311/map/index_e.html (last accessed 12 June 2013)
6 e.g. http://dbx.cr.chiba-u.jp/act/fukushima/

References

Association of Japanese Geographers 1960. Geographical Review of Japan 33: 97-189. (JE)
Association of Japanese Geographers 1996. Geographical Review of Japan Ser.A 69: 467-637. (JE)
Association of Japanese Geographers 2003. Geographical Review of Japan 76:924-934.
Association of Japanese Geographers 2004. Geographical Review of Japan 77:883-886.
Association of Japanese Geographers 2005. Geographical Review of Japan 78:867-878.
Endo, K. and Nakabayashi, I. (ed.) 2006. Geographical Review of Japan 79:738-743.
Fujita, T. et al. 1989. Transactions Japanese Geomorphological Union 10A:23-24.
Kadomura, H. et al. 1983. Journal of Natural Disaster Science 5(2): 33-62.
Kadomura, H. et al. 1978. Environmental Science, Hokkaido University 1: 49-74.
Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996. GeoJournal 38:229-377.
Koike, K. 2001. In Regional geomorphology of the Japanese Islands vol.1 Introduction to Japanese geomorphology, ed. Yonekura, N. et al., 281-296. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. (J)Kumaki, Y. 1999. Transactions Japanese Geomorphological Union 20:405-418. (JE)
Nakabayashi, I. 1990. Geographical Reports of Tokyo Metropolitan University 25:249-260.
Ogasawara, Y. 1947. Journal of the Geographical Survey Institute Special Issue: 2-20. (J)Ota, Y and Okumura, K. 1999. The Quaternary Research 38: 253-261.
Oya, M. 1956. Reconnaissance topographical survey map of lower part of the Kiso river basin. Supplement for R. C. Reference Data 46, Resources Council Japan. (J)Oya, M. et al. 1982. Geomorphologic land classification map of the Shonai plain illustrating features of flooding and soil liquefaction. Sakata Construction Office, Ministry ofConstruction. (JE)
Research Group for Active Faults of Japan 1980. Active Faults in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. (JE)
Research Group for Active Faults of Japan 1991. Active Faults in Japan (rev. ed.) Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press. (JE)
Suwa, H. 1988. Transactions Japanese Geomorphological Union 9:151-178.