[NOTICE: These Results of Exercise of Voting Rights are a translation of an extract from the Extraordinary
Report prepared in the Japanese language for convenience purposes only, and in the event of any discrepancy,
the Japanese language original shall prevail.]
June 26, 2020
Mebuki Financial Group, Inc.
Results of Exercise of Voting Rights
Mebuki Financial Group, Inc. (hereinafter the “Company”) hereby announces that it filed today anextraordinary report concerning the results of the exercise of voting rights at the 4th Ordinary General
Meeting of Shareholders of the Company.
1.

Date on which the General Meeting of Shareholders was held
June 24, 20202.

Details of Proposals Resolved
Proposal No. 1: Election of Seven (7) Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit and SupervisoryCommittee Members)
Election of Ritsuo Sasajima, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Hidebumi Nishino, Yoshihiro Naito,
Tetsuya Akino, Hiromichi Ono and Yoshimi Shu as Directors (excluding Directors
who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members).
Proposal No. 2: Election of Five (5) Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members
Election of Eiji Murashima, Kunihiro Ono, Satoru Kawamata, Toru Nagasawa andTakashi Shimizu as Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members.
Proposal No. 3: Election of One (1) Substitute Director who is an Audit and Supervisory Committee
MemberElection of Kazunori Shinozaki as a Substitute Director who is an Audit andSupervisory Committee Member.
Proposal No. 4: Determination of Restricted Stock Remuneration Plan for Directors (excludingDirectors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members and OutsideDirectors)
Remuneration will be paid to Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit andSupervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors) for the granting ofrestricted stock, with the total amount set at 20 million yen or less per year (however,excluding employee salaries for Directors concurrently serving as employees).

―1―

3.

The number of voting rights which represent either for, against or abstaining on proposals resolved;
requirements for the approval of the resolutions and their results
Proposals

Approving
Disapproving Abstaining(Number of(Number of(Number of Approval ratio Voting results
voting rights) voting rights) abstaining)
Proposal No. 1 Election of Seven (7) Directors (excluding Directors who are Audit and Supervisory CommitteeMembers)
Ritsuo Sasajima

9,709,623

78,290379

99.11%

Approved

Kazuyuki Shimizu

9,742,236

46,058099.45%

Approved

Hidebumi Nishino

9,741,252

47,042099.44%

Approved

Yoshihiro Naito

9,741,744

46,550099.44%

Approved

Tetsuya Akino

9,741,987

46,307099.44%

Approved

Hiromichi Ono

9,778,721

9,574

099.82%

Approved

Yoshimi Shu

9,777,538

10,757099.81%

Approved

Proposal No. 2 Election of Five (5) Directors who are Audit and Supervisory Committee Members
Eiji Murashima

9,551,875

236,407097.50%

Approved

Kunihiro Ono

9,552,420

235,862097.51%

Approved

Satoru Kawamata

9,762,670

25,625099.65%

Approved

Toru Nagasawa

9,730,074

58,220099.32%

Approved

Takashi Shimizu

9,735,603

52,691

099.38%

Approved

Proposal No. 3 Election of One (1) Substitute Director who is an Audit and Supervisory Committee Member
Kazunori Shinozaki

9,782,394

5,902

099.86%

Approved

Proposal No. 4 Determination of Restricted Stock Remuneration Plan for Directors (excluding Directors who areAudit and Supervisory Committee Members and Outside Directors)
9,695,178

91,911

098.97%

Approved(Notes) The requirements for the approval for the proposals are as below.
・Proposals No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 require the attendance of shareholders holding one-third or more of
voting rights who are eligible for exercising voting rights (quorum requirements) and approval by amajority of voting rights held by the shareholders in attendance.
・Proposal No. 4 requires approval by a majority of the voting rights held by shareholders in attendance
who are eligible for exercising voting rights.
4.

The reason a portion of the number of voting rights held by the shareholders in attendance at theGeneral Meeting of Shareholders was not included in the number of voting rights
Resolution of the proposal has been legitimately reached in accordance with the Companies Act, as therequirement for approval have been met based on the number of confirmed votes of approval ordisapproval by counting the voting rights exercised up to the day before this General Meeting ofShareholders and those of shareholders in attendance. Therefore, of the shareholders in attendance,
those voting rights which were not possible to confirm whether approving, disapproving or abstaining
have not been counted.
―2―