Effects of the Fukushima nuclear meltdowns on environment and health
February 16th, 2012
Dr. med. Alex Rosen, University Clinic Düsseldorf, Department of General Paediatrics
Abstract
The earthquake and tsunami on March 11th, 2011 led to multiple nuclear meltdowns in the reactors of
the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Northern Japan. Radioactive emissions from the plantcaused widespread radioactive contamination of the entire region. The vast majority of the nuclear fallout occurred over the North Pacific, constituting the largest radioactive contamination of the oceansever recorded. Soil and water samples, as well as marine animals have been found to be highly contaminated. Increased levels of radioactivity were recorded at all radiation measuring posts in the
Northern Hemisphere. Fallout contaminated large parts of Eastern Honshu island, including the Tokyo
metropolitan area. Within a 20 km radius, up to 200,000 people had to leave their homes. Outside ofthis evacuation zone, the radioactive fallout contaminated more than 870 km 2 of land, home to about
70,000 people who were not evacuated. These people were exposed to harmful radioisotopes andnow have an increased risk to develop cancer or other radiation-induced diseases. Many people still
live in areas with high contamination. Food, milk and drinking water have been contaminated as well,leading to internal radiation exposure. Most severely affected are children, as their bodies are more
susceptible to radiation damage. Preliminary tests have shown internal radioactive contamination ofchildren with iodine-131 and caesium-137. It is too early to estimate the extent of health effects causedby the nuclear disaster. Taking into consideration the studies on Chernobyl survivors and the findingsof the BEIR VII report, scientists will be able to estimate the effects once the true extent of radioactive
emissions, fallout and contamination are better studied. Large-scale independent epidemiologicalstudies are needed in order to better help the victims of this catastrophe. Claims by scientists affiliatedwith the nuclear industry that no health effects are to be expected are unscientific and immoral.

The nuclear meltdowns
On the 11th of March, 2011, a magnitude 9.0 earthquake hit Northern Japan. The earthquake led to atsunami on the Eastern coast of Northern Japan, leading to further destruction. More than 15.000
people died as a direct result of the earthquake and tsunami, more than 500.000 had to be evacuated.1 The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was severely damaged by the quake and thetsunami. With no electricity to power the cooling systems, water inside the reactors began to boil off,causing meltdowns of the uranium fuel rods inside of reactor cores 1 to 3. TEPCO, the company responsible for the plant, began to vent steam from the reactors in order to relieve pressure and preventa giant explosion. This steam carried radioactive particles out to the Pacific Ocean.
Since it became evident that a nuclear meltdown was possibly taking place in the reactor cores, a 20
km zone around the power plant was declared an evacuation zone, a total of 200,000 people wereforced to leave their homes and iodine tablets were distributed to the population in order to reduce theuptake of radioactive iodine.2 While evacuations were commencing, multiple explosions destroyed reactor 1, 2 and 3 and caused a fire of the spent fuel pond of reactor 4. To cool off the cores, TEPCO
took the controversial decision to pump seawater into the reactor. This could not prevent the temperatures from rising even further, as the nuclear fuel rods were left partially uncovered. According to
TEPCO, all fuel rods in reactor 1 melted, a well as 57% of the fuel rods in reactor 2 and 63% of thosein reactor 3.3 Also, as a result, massive amounts of radioactively contaminated water flowed into thegroundwater and back into the ocean.
On March 25th, people living in the 30 km radius were asked to voluntarily evacuate their homes andleave the contaminated areas. On April 12th, the Fukushima nuclear meltdowns were categorized as alevel 7 nuclear accident – the highest level on the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES), which had
previously only been reached by the Chernobyl disaster.

Radioactive emissions into the atmosphere
The four large explosions, the fire of the spent fuel pond, smoke, evaporation of sea-water used forcooling and deliberate venting of the pressurized reactors all caused the emission of radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere. Measurements of radioactivity taken outside of the power plant reached amaximum of 10.85 mSv/h, or about 38,000 times the normal background radiation. Further deliberate
venting of block 2 and 3 on March 16th led to additional air-borne releases of radioactivity in similar
magnitudes.4 Radioactivity doses around the plant a week after the earthquake reached levels of up to
1,930 µSv/h – more than 6,000 times normal background radiation.5
Using data from radioactivity measuring posts set up under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty(CTBT), the Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG) calculated theamount of radioactivity released by the Fukushima meltdowns to be between 360-390 PBq of iodine131 and around 50 PBq of caesium-137 for the period of March 12th – March 14th. According to theircalculations, the iodine-131 emissions from Fukushima in those three days amounted to 20% of thetotal iodine-131 emissions from Chernobyl (1,760 PBq), while the emissions of caesium-137 in those
three days amounted to about 60% of the total caesium-137 emissions from Chernobyl (85 PBq).6
A study by the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) found that around 16,700 PBq of xenon133 (250% of the amount released at Chernobyl) were emitted by the Fukushima power plant between
March12th and 19th. This constitutes the largest release of radioactive Xenon in history. Xenon-133 isa radioactive gas with a half-life of 5.2 days, which emits beta- and gamma-radiation and cause harm
upon inhalation. Additionally, the NILU study found that 35.8 PBq of caesium-137 (42% of the amountreleased at Chernobyl) were emitted by the Fukushima power plant between March 12th and 19th.
Their study found that radioactive emissions were first measured right after the earthquake and before
the tsunami struck the plant, showing that the quake itself had already caused substantial damage tothe reactors. The NILU report also suggests that the fire in the spent fuel pond of reactor 4 may havebeen the major contributor of airborne emissions, since emissions decreased significantly after the fire
had been brought under control.7
In its report to the IAEA, the Japanese government states that the total amount of fission products released into the atmosphere amounts to 840 PBq, a number even higher than previous estimates. Theircalculations for the emission of iodine-131, caesium-137 and xenon-133 show results in the same
magnitude as those calculated by the ZAMG and NILU scientists. In addition to the emission of iodine131, caesium-137, strontium, plutonium and xenon-133 listed below in Table 1, a number of other radioactive isotopes were also released, namely caesium-134, barium-140, tellurium-127m, tellurium129m, tellurium-131m, tellurium-132, ruthenium-103, ruthenium-106, zirconium-95, cerium-141, cerium-144, neptunium-239, yttrium-91, praseodymium-143, neodymium-147, curium-242, iodine-132,
iodine-133, iodine-135, antimony-127, antimony-129 and molybdenum-99.8

Table 1: Estimated amounts of total emissions
Radioactive Isotope
Value

Period of timethth

Reference

Iodine-131

360-390 PBq
319 PBq

March 12 -14
March 12th-15th

ZAMG5TEPCO8

Caesium-137

50 PBq35.8 PBq
30.3 PBq

March 12th-14th
March 12th-April 20th
March 12th-15th

ZAMG5
NILU6
TEPCO8Strontium-89/90

4.24 PBq

March 12th-15th

TEPCO8

Plutonium-238/239/240/241

2.500.000 MBq

March 12th-15th

TEPCO8

Xenon-133

16,700 PBq
22,300 PBq

March 12th-April 20th
March 12th-15th

NILU6TEPCO8

The radioactive particles were carried away by prevailing wind currents in the form of radioactive
clouds, similar to the phenomenon after the Chernobyl disaster. According to the Norwegian Institutefor Air Research (NILU), precipitation from the radioactive clouds released approximately 79% of thetotal caesium-137 above the North Pacific Ocean. Approximately 19% of the caesium-137 (6.4 millionMBq) precipitated above the landmass of Eastern Honshu Island. 7 While western Japan was shelteredby mountain ranges, large areas of north-eastern Honshu Island, including the Tokyo metropolitanarea, were radioactively contaminated by nuclear fallout. The radioactive cloud created a trace of contamination more than 40 km in length and about 20 km width with hot-spots where precipitation was
highest.9 The remaining 2% were spread further East, as the radioactive cloud reached North America
on March 15th and Europe on March 22nd.7 Three weeks after the earthquake, all CTBT-measuring
posts in the Northern Hemisphere recorded increased atmospheric radioactivity. By the middle of April,
these measurements began to decrease, as radioactive particles had precipitated over land and water.10 Yet even after almost a year, the release of radioactive isotopes has not been brought undercontrol. According to a TEPCO status report from January 27 th 2012, atmospheric emission of radioactive caesium was still measured with 60 MBq per hour – that's 1,440 MBq each day.29
Soil contamination
The nuclear fallout included different types of radioactive particles, each with its own characteristics.
The Japanese Ministry of Science and Technology (MEXT) conducted soil surveys in 100 locations
within 80 km of the Fukushima power plant in June and July of 2011. In the entire prefecture, theyfound contamination with various radioactive substances. While the list of radioactive isotopes released during the meltdowns included more than 30 (see previous chapter), the most well-known for
causing damage to human tissue are the following:•

Strontium-90: Strontium-90 with a physical half-life of 28 years is a beta-emitting radioactive
particle. Upon ingestion, it is metabolized similar to calcium. This means that it is incorporated
into the bone, where it can remain for many decades (biological half-life of 50 years). In thebone, strontium irradiates the sensible blood-producing bone-marrow and can cause leukemia
and other malignant diseases of the blood.11 On April 18th, 2011, TEPCO found 400 Bq/kg ofstrontium-90 on a playground near the plant. The MEXT survey found strontium-90 in concentrations of 1.8-32 Bq/kg in places outside the 30 km evacuation zone like Nishigou, Motomiya,
Ootama or Ono.12•

Iodine-131: This radioisotope has a relatively short half-life of 8 days. If ingested, it behaves
like normal iodine and is incorporated into the thyroid gland. Here, it damages surrounding tissue with beta- and gamma-radiation until its full decay, causing thyroid cancer, especially inchildren.11 Radioactive iodine has been found in milk, drinking water, vegetables and wateraround Northern Japan (see section on food and drink below). According to the IAEA, iodine131 deposition in Tokyo reached 36,000 Bq/m2 on March 22nd and 23rd.5 Soil samples in themunicipalities of Nishigou, Izumizaki, Ootama, Shirakawa, Nihonmatsu, Date, Iwaki, Iitate,Ono, Minamisoma and Tamura showed concentrations of radioactive iodine-131 between
2,000 and 1,170,000 Bq/kg. In the municipality of Ono, 40 km southwest of the Fukushimaplant, MEXT scientists found up to 7,440 Bq/kg of iodine-131 in rainwater samples. 13 In Augustof 2011, MEXT scientists still found iodine-131 concentrations of more than 200 Bq/kg in mostof the above-mentioned municipalities, with maximum ranges found in Namie and Iitate of
1,300 and 1,100 Bq/kg, respectively. 14 As iodine-131 has a half-life of 8 days, measurements
this high, 145 days after the initial fallout on March 15 th, either suggest extremely high initial
contamination of the soil of more than 288,000,000 Bq/kg or, additional contamination of thearea with iodine-131 after the initial fallout on March 15th.

•

Caesium-137: This radioisotope has a half live of 30 years. Upon ingestion, it is metabolized
similar to potassium. This means that it is fairly evenly distributed in the body. Caesium ismainly a beta-emitter, but its decay product barium-137m also produces gamma-radiation. It
can cause solid tumors in virtually all organs. Caesium-137 has a biological half-life of 70 days
and is secreted through urine similar to potassium. It therefore accumulates in the bladder,where it can cause irradiation of the adjacent uterus and fetus in pregnant women. 11 In its
comprehensive report of May 2011, the French Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear
Safety IRSN states that around 874 km2 of the area outside of the 20 km evacuation zone
must be considered highly contaminated with radioactive caesium. They estimatedconcentrations of the radioisotope of more than 600,000 Bq/m2, similar to the evacuation zone

around the Chernobyl power plant.15 Caesium-137 levels in Fukushima prefecture evenreached up to 30,000,000 Bq/m2 in the radioactive trace north-west of the plant and up to
10,000,000 Bq/m2 in the neighboring prefectures.15 Soil samples between 20,000 and 220,000
Bq/kg of caesium-137 were found by the scientists from MEXT in the municipalities of Iitate,
Kawamata, Name, Katsurao and Nihonmatsu in April 2011.13 Even higher values, reaching up
to 420,000 Bq/kg of caesium-137 were recorded four months later and in August of 2011. 14
According to the IAEA, caesium-137 deposition in Tokyo reached 340 Bq/m 2 on March 22ndand 23rd.5 Radioactive caesium was also found in large quantities in beef, rice, milk, fish,
drinking-water and other foodstuff after the Fukushima meltdowns (see section on food anddrink below).
Table 2: Half-lives of radioactive isotopes16:
Isotope
Physical half-life
Biological half-life
Iodine-131
8 days80 daysCaesium-137
30 years
70 days
Strontium-90
28 years
50 years

Effective half-life
7.3 days
70 days
18 years

Contamination of the marine environment
Massive amounts of water were used in a desperate attempt to cool the reactors and the burning
spent fuel ponds. This led to equally large amounts of radioactive waste water, which was continuallydischarged into the sea, seeped into soil and ground-water deposits or evaporated into the atmosphere. Between April 4th and 10th, TEPCO deliberately released 10,393 tons of radioactive water according to the official report by the Japanese government. This same report calculates that a total of
4.7 PBq of radioactive discharge was released into the Pacific ocean due to the meltdowns. This constitutes the single highest radioactive discharge into the oceans ever recorded.17 Together with the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests, the fallout from Chernobyl and the radioactive discharge of nuclear
reprocessing plants like Sellafield or La Hague, the Fukushima disaster already ranks as one of theprime radioactive pollutants of the world’s oceans according to a comprehensive report by the IAEA.18
Measurements by the IAEA and the German Society for Reactor Safety showed levels of radioactive
iodine in the water close to the Fukushima nuclear power plant of 130,000 Bq/l, while radioactive caesium was detected with concentrations of up to 63,000 Bq/l.19 20 Activity of radioactive caesium in bottom sediments amounted to 910 Bq/kg in the vicinity of the plant. 20 According to the Japanese Atomic Industrial Forum, the levels of radioactive iodine-131 were found to be 7.5 million times the safety
limit near reactor No. 2.21 Concentrations of caesium-137 28 km off shore were much higher thanthose measured in the ocean after Chernobyl.17 Even 60 km away from the coastline, radiation readings still reached 100 Bq/l, both on the surface and in deep water. 20 By July 2011, levels of caesium137 in the coastal waters off Japan were still more than 10,000 times higher than levels measured in2010.22
The waters north-east of the Fukushima plant are amongst the busiest fishing zones in the world. Halfof Japan's sea-food comes from this area. Fish and other marine animals in Ibaraki prefecture showedelevated levels of radioactive isotopes and had to be treated as radioactive waste (see section on foodand drink below).20 23
It is often stated that the dilution effect of the radioactive waste discharged into the ocean decreases
the effects on the environment and the food chain. It has to be noted, however, that the radioactive
particles do not disappeared through dilution but are only distributed over a larger area. This is dangerous for two reasons: Due to the spread of radioactive contamination in the Pacific Ocean, more
people are potentially affected, as there is no safe minimum threshold for radioactivity. 24 Even thesmallest amount can cause cancer in human beings when ingested with water or food (see section on
health effects below). Secondly, the trophic cascade leads to an accumulation of radioactivity in fish
higher up the food chain, which are then eaten by humans. Radioactive caesium levels in sea basscaught in the North Pacific continually rose from March until September, for example, with a maximum
contamination found on September 15th of 670 Bq/kg.20

Effects on food and drinking water
As stated above, there is no safe level of radioactivity in food and drinking water. Potentially, even theslightest amount of radioactivity can cause genetic mutation and cancer.24 According to the German
Society for Radiation Protection, it is estimated that a person is normally exposed to about 0.3 mSv
per year through ingestion of food and drink. This should be considered the permissible level of ingested radioactivity in order to prevent excessive health risks. In order not to surpass this level, theamount of radioactive caesium-137 should not exceed 8 Bq/kg in milk and baby formula and 16 Bq/kg
in all other foodstuff. Radioactive iodine with its short half-life should not be permitted in food at all. 25 In
Japan however, the permissible level of radioactive caesium in milk and baby formula was set at 200
Bq/kg and 500 Bq/kg for all other foodstuff. For radioactive iodine, the permissible level was set at 300
Bq/kg for milk and drinking water and 2,000 Bq/kg for vegetables.25 26
The Fukushima nuclear meltdowns caused a major contamination of food and drink in Japan. According to the IAEA, nearly all vegetable and milk samples taken in Ibaraki and Fukushima prefectures one
week after the earthquake revealed levels of iodine-131 and caesium-137 exceeding the radioactivity
limits set for food and drink in Japan. 5 In the months after the catastrophe, contamination was found tobe even higher in certain foods:

•

•
•
•
•

•

•

Vegetables and fruits: Outside of the evacuation zone in Fukushima prefecture, the MEXT
survey one week after the earthquake found contaminated vegetables in the municipalities of
Iitate, Kawamata, Tamura, Ono, Minamisoma, Iwaki, Tsukidate, Nihonmatsu, Sirakawa, Sukagawa, Ootama, Izumizaki and Saigou, some with iodine-131 concentrations as high as
2,540,000 Bq/kg and caesium-137 concentrations of up to 2,650,000.13 One month after the
meltdowns, concentrations were still found to be above 100,000 Bq/kg for iodine-131 and
900,000 Bq/kg for caesium-137 in some regions.13 In Ibaraki prefecture, about 100 km southof the Fukushima plant, the prefectural government announced finding spinach with radioactive iodine-levels of up to 54,100 Bq/kg and radioactive caesium-levels of up to 1,931 Bq/kg.27
Beside spinach, most other vegetable samples also included more or less radioactivity, mostnotable mustard plants with 1,200 Bq/kg of iodine-131, parsley with 12,000 Bq/kg of iodine131 and 2,110 Bq/kg of caesium-137 and Chichitake mushrooms with 8,000 Bq/kg of caesium-137. Lesser amounts of radiation were found on lettuce, onions, tomatoes, strawberries,
wheat and barley.27
Milk: On March 20th, the IAEA first warned of milk from Fukushima prefecture containing significant amounts of radioactive iodine-131 and caesium-137.28
Beef: Distribution of beef continues to be restricted due to radioactive materials exceeding
provisional standards set by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare: Fukushima, Toshigi,
Miyagi, Iwate.29
Rice: Japanese Atomic According to the Fukushima prefectural government, contaminatedrice was found in Onami district and in Date city with caesium-levels reaching 1,050 Bq/kg.30
Drinking water: The IAEA warned that permissible levels of iodine-131 were exceeded indrinking water samples taken in the Fukushima, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma, Chiba and Saitamar
prefectures between March 17th and 23rd.5 Even in a northern district of Tokyo, tap water contained 210 Bq/l of iodine-131.31
Fish and sea-food: Radioactive caesium in fish and sea-food caught close to the nuclear
power plant was found to reach levels of 500-1,000 Bq/kg.20 In April of 2011, the JapaneseFishing Ministry measured radioactive iodine and caesium in sand lance from Fukushima prefecture each with an activity of up to 12,000 Bq/kg.32 In its “Analysis of Matrices of the Marine
Environment”, the independent French radioactivity laboratory ACRO found radioactivity readings of more than 10.000 Bq/kg in algae fished outside of the 20 km evacuation zone. One
sample even showed levels of 127.000 Bq/kg of iodine-131, 800 Bq/kg of caesium-134 and
840 Bq/kg of caesium-137.33
Tea: According to the prefectural government of Shizuoka, a prefecture about 400 km awayfrom Fukushima, local tea leaves were found to be contaminated with 679 Bq/kg of radioactive
caesium-137. Radioactive Japanese green tea was discovered in France in June 2011.34

Case report: Iitate village
The village of Iitate is an example of the effects of radioactive fallout on a typical residential area.
The explosion of reactor 2 and the burning spent fuel pond of reactor 4 on March 15th, 2011 led toa massive emission of radioisotopes that were carried 40 northwest by a radioactive cloud, where
they precipitated over the village of Iitate at around 18:00 in the evening. As the village lay outside
the concentric 20 km evacuation circle around the plant, no evacuation measures were undertaken.35
Two weeks after the nuclear fallout occurred, scientists from the Japanese Ministry of Science
MEXT, the university of Hiroshima and the university of Kyoto found radioactivity levels of 2-3µSv/h in dust samples inside of buildings and between 2-44.7 µSv/h on the outside.13 35 A child living in Iitate and spending about 8 hours of the day outside and 16 hours inside would be exposed
to about 148 mSv in the course of a year - 100 times the natural background radiation in Japan of
1.48 mSv per year.36 Even five months after the fallout, radioactivity levels of around 16 µSv/h
were still recorded in dust samples in Iitate.13 Soil samples taken by MEXT scientists in Iitate
showed radioactive caesium concentration as high as 227.000 Bq/kg, radioactive strontium-90
with concentrations of 32 Bq/kg and radioactive iodine concentrations of up to 1,170,000 Bq/kg.
Scientists calculated an individual external exposure dose over the 90 days after the radioactive
fallout of 30-95 mSv, depending on movement patterns and habits. 35 This amounts to 20-64 times
the natural background radiation level or the equivalent of 300-950 chest x-rays over three months(one chest x-ray causes a dose of about 0,1 mSv).37 Levels this high are especially dangerous for
pregnant women, children and people with reduced immune systems who are more susceptible tothe development of cancer.
An additional source of radiation is the inhalation of radioactive particles and the ingestion of contaminated food and water. Japanese government samples found vegetables from Iitate highly contaminated with more than 2,500,000 Bq/kg of iodine-131 and more than 2,600,000 Bq/kg of caesium-137.13 Drinking water was found to contain 965 Bq/l.38 No epidemiological data has yet been
published on the observed health effects of the Iitate population (birth statistics, morbidity, etc.).

Effects on health
When discussing health effects of the Fukushima disaster, it is important to distinguish several groups
with different risk constellations:•

Employees, rescue- and clean-up workers: The most acutely affected by high radiation
were the workers and emergency personnel in and around the failing nuclear power plant. According to the Japanese Atomic Information Forum, radiation levels inside the plant peaked at
1,000 mSv/h, a dose that is fatal to human beings exposed to it for more than a few hours. 8 39
While initial airborne emissions decreased gradually, massive amounts of radiation still existedon the site, especially through washout effects of the water which was continually pumped into
the plant in order to cool the reactors. By August 1st, five months after the earthquake, radiation of 10 Sv/h was still detected around the plant's premises, endangering the workers involved in the clean-up and shut-down of the plant.40 According to the Japanese Atomic Information Forum, a total of 8,300 workers have been deployed in the rescue- and clean-up operations since March. In July, TEPCO announced that 111 workers had been exposed to radiation of more than 100 mSv, some as high as 678 mSv. 41 Not taken into consideration at all
are the effects of internal radiation through ingestion or inhalation of radioisotopes, which may
cause diseases similar to those occurring in the liquidators of the Chernobyl accident.42•

Inhabitants of contaminated areas: Following the nuclear meltdowns, the government
ordered 200,000 people to evacuate their homes as an area of about 600 km 2 around theplant was deemed to be uninhabitable due to radioactive fallout.2 About 70,000 people, including 9,500 children were still living in highly contaminated areas outside of the evacuation zone
two months after the Fukushima meltdowns. 15 Radiation levels between 16-115 µSv/h were
measured outside of the 20 km evacuation zone by the IAEA radiation monitoring team. 5 The

IAEA's conservative extrapolations from these soil samples calculate the total dose of beta-radiation in the area of 30-32 km from the plant to be 3,800,000-4,900,000 Bq/m². 5 MEXT scientists confirmed these readings in their soil surveys in April of 2011: Dose rates recorded in several cities of the affected region outside of the evacuation zone still showed radiation levels of
more than 2 µSv/h in Nihonmatsu, Tamura, Souma, Minamisoma and Date, more than 5µSv/h in Fukushima city and Katsurao, more than 10 µSv/h in Kawamata and Hirono, morethan 50 µSv/h in Namie and more than 100 µSv/h in Iitate.13 35 Four months later, in August of
2011, the MEXT scientists still found radiation doses of up to 34 mSv/h in Namie, up to 16
mSv/h in Iitate and up to 17,5 mSv/h in Katsurao.14
The IRSN projected the external exposure of the 70,000 people living in the highly contaminated areas outside of the 20 km evacuation zone can reach up to 200 mSv in the first year and
up to 4 Sv over the course of a lifetime, not including additional radioactive exposure throughingestion of contaminated food, air or water. 15 The external collective dose received over 4
years by this population was calculated to be 4,400 person-Sv. This amounts of about 60% of
the collective dose received by the population in the highly contaminated regions around
Chernobyl.15 The IRSN concluded in its report that only the evacuation of people from theseareas could lead to a decisive reduction of the radioactive exposure.15
Data published by MEXT in April of 2011 seems to confirm these calculations. They estimate
doses over the course of one year of up to 235.4 mSv in the town of Namie, 61.7 mSv in Iitate,24.2 mSv in Kawamata, 21.2 in Date, 18 mSv in Katsurao, 15.6 in Minamisoma and more than
10 mSv in Fukushima city and Koriyama – both more than 55 km away from the plant.9 The
natural background radiation in Japan is 1.48 mSv per year. 36 This means that in April of 2011,
the Japanese Ministry of Health expected the population in these cities to be exposed to morethan 6-160 times the normal background radiation in the year after the catastrophe. In a press
release on March 23rd, the Japanese Nuclear Safety Commission estimated the thyroid dosefor children of one year to be between 100 mSv and 1000 mSv through inhalation of radioactive iodine-131.43•

People affected through ingestion of contaminated food: Fukushima caused the greatest
radioactive contamination of the world's oceans ever recorded.17 This and the large-scale contamination of harvest crops, the pollution of groundwater supplies and the high permissiblelevels of radioactivity in food and drink have led to the ingestion of radioactive particles likeiodine-131, strontium-90 or caesium-137 by people in Japan, in countries around the North
Pacific and everywhere contaminated products ended up in markets or on the supermarket
shelves. As stated in the section on food and drinks, the MEXT survey found vegetables contaminated with iodine-131 concentrations of more than 100,000 Bq/kg and caesium-137 concentrations of more than 900,000 Bq/kg one month after the meltdowns. The external radiationdose of these vegetables lay between 10 and 30 µSv/h.13
Knowing the activity (measured in Bq) and multiplying this by a dose coefficient, it is possible
to calculate the dose of internal radiation (measured in Sv). In 2010, the European Committeeon Radiation Risks (ECRR) published such dose coefficients specifically for nuclear disasters
where internal radiation exposure through ingestion or inhalation plays a large role in the development of cancer diseases.44 Using these dose coefficient, listed in detail below, it can becalculated that the internal organs of an adult eating 500g of food contaminated with 100,000
Bq/kg of iodine-131 and 900,000 Bq/kg of caesium-137 would be exposed to about 34,8 mSv.
As stated above, the normal exposure to internal radioactivity through food per year is 0.3
mSv.25 Eating just 500g of this contaminated food would cause an internal radiation exposureof more than 100 times the normal exposure per year. For a child of 1-14 years, the internalradiation exposure would be double that of an adult and for toddlers and fetuses, the impact ofradioactively contaminated food is even more harmful as the different dose coefficients inTable 3 and the exemplary calculation in Table 4 demonstrate:
Table 3: Dose coefficients upon ingestion in Sv/Bq, depending on age44
Isotope
Iodine-131
Caesium-137
Strontium-90

Fetus
5.5 x 10-6
3.2 x 10-6
4.5 x10-4

Child < 1 year
5.5 x 10-7
3.2 x 10-7
4.5 x10-5

Child 1-14 years
2.2 x 10-7
1.3 x 10-7
1.8 x10-5Adult
1.1 x 10-7
6.5 x 10-8
9.0 x10-6

Table 4: Examples for internal radiation through ingestion of contaminated food in children*
Type of food
Quantity
Activity
13
Fukushima vegetables March 2011500g
2,540,000 Bq/kg
13
Fukushima vegetables March 2011500g
2,650,000 Bq/kg
13
Fukushima vegetables April 2011500g
100,000 Bq/kg
13
Fukushima vegetables April 2011500g
900,000 Bq/kg
27
Ibaraki spinach March 2011
500g
54,100 Bq/kg
27
Ibaraki spinach March 2011500g
1,931 Bq/kg
30
Fukushima rice, November 2011500g
1,050 Bq/kg
38
Tap water in Iitate March 20th, 2011
1l
965 Bq/l
Tap water in Tokyo March rd23
, 2011311l
210 Bq/l
21
Sea bass caught in September 2011
500g
670 Bq/kg

IsotopeI-131
Cs-137
I-131
Cs-137
I-131
Cs-137
Cs-137
I-131
I-131
Cs-137

Child < 1 yr Child 1-14 yr
698.5 mSv 279.40 mSv
424 mSv 172,25 mSv
27.50 mSv
99 mSv
144 mSv
58.50 mSv
14.88 mSv 5.95 mSv
0.31 mSv
0.13 mSv
0,17 mSv
0,07 mSv
0.53 mSv
0.21 mSv
0.12 mSv
0.05 mSv
0.11 mSv
0.04 mSv

As stated before, the greatest health effects of radiation are seen in children. They have a higher surface area, a more permeable skin, their immune systems are not yet fully developed, they breathe inmore air per minute than adults, the metabolism of their tissues is higher and their habits like playing
on or eating from the ground lead to a higher exposure to radiation. In the womb, the unborn child receives radioactive isotopes through the umbilical vein and is irradiated by gamma-radiation from isotopes collected in the bladder. Radioactive isotopes like iodine-131 are also transmitted throughbreast-milk. In May of 2011, the MEXT published a list of soil measurements taken in kindergartens,
schools and day-care centers. None of the places surveyed had radioactive iodine-131 measurements
below 1,200 Bq/kg. The highest measurement was found at an elementary school in Date city: 6,800
Bq/kg of iodine-131.45 Concerning caesium-137, the soil concentrations laid between 620 Bq/kg and
9,900 Bq/kg.45 After the Fukushima disaster, the Japanese government raised the permissible level ofradioactive exposure for children to 3.8 µSv/h, which amounts to about 20 mSv per year on April 19 th,
2011.46 After protests by parent organizations, scientists and doctors, the government rescinded the
new guidelines on May 27th, distributed dosimeters to all students in the region and returned to theformer permissible level of 1 mSv per year.47
First studies have been performed to estimate the effect of radioactive iodine-131 on the thyroid
glands of children. In the end of March, 2011, a group of researchers around Hiroshima University professor Satoshi Tashiro tested 1,149 children aged 0 to 15 from Iwaki city, Kawamata town and Iitate
village. 44.6 % of these 1,080 valid results showed radioactive contamination of up to 35 mSv in their
thyroid glands. The results of this study were presented to the Japan Pediatric Society on August 13th,
2011, but have not been published yet.48 In October of 2011, the University of Fukushima began withthyroid-examinations on 360,000 children living in the regions affected by radioactive contamination.
The university hopes to have finished initial testing of all children by the end of 2014. According to theJapanese Atomic Industrial Forum, the affected children would then have to undergo biannual checkups until the age of 20 and every 5 years above that age for the rest of their lives.49
Radioactive caesium is another substance posing a health threat to children. A large-scale urine study
performed on 1,500 children from Minamisoma in November of 2011 found caesium concentrations of
20-30 Bq/l and, in the case of a one-year old boy, even up to 187 Bq/l. 50 These measurements do notallow extrapolation of radiation exposure dose, but show that some amount of radioactive caesium had
to have been ingested by these children and remained in their systems for it to show up in urine
samples eight months after the catastrophe.
Not a single epidemiological study on the health effects of the Fukushima nuclear catastrophe has yet
been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Except for the unpublished small studies cited above, there
is no scientific data to ascertain the extent to which the people of the affected regions will be affected.
As for estimations, we have a fairly good idea of the effects of external high-level radiation of morethan 100 mSv on the human body from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.51 We know that a certain dose of radiation can cause acute radiation sickness and can lead to the development of malignant diseases in
the long-term.

*The average annual dose of internal radioactivity through food and drink is about 0.3 mSv, which breaks down to about 0.0008
mSv per day. All of these exemplary calculations result in doses above this daily level.

The studies after Chernobyl have shown however that after a nuclear meltdown, the more relevant
mode of radioactive exposure in terms of population health is internal low-level radiation (<100 mSv)
through the incorporation of radioactive particles.44 52 These particles remain inside the body, damaging internal organs and causing malignancies many years after initial exposure. The overall healthimpact of internal radiation is naturally very difficult to ascertain. After the Chernobyl disaster, a study
published in the International Journal of Cancer estimated an additional 41,000 cases of cancer andmore than 15,000 additional cancer deaths due to radiation from the nuclear fallout. 42 Birth defects, genetic mutations, infertility and still-births also rose significantly after the nuclear catastrophe in 1986.
Additionally, numerous studies have been published in recent years, showing a significant rise in theincidence of non-cancer diseases amongst the affected populations.52
The National Academy of Sciences Advisory Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation(BEIR) published a lifetime cancer risk model in its report “Health risks from exposure to low levels of
ionizing radiation”, also known as BEIR-VII. Taking into consideration the effects of ionizing radiation
on human tissue, the BEIR committee calculates that exposure to 1 Sv causes cancer in 1 out of 10
people, while exposure to 100 mSv would cause cancer in 1 out of 100 people, exposure to 10 mSv in
1 out of 1,000 people and so on.24 This model has been used to calculate expected cancer cases insimilar accidents, such as the Chernobyl disaster, and could be used to predict excess cancer casesin the people affected by the Fukushima fallout. For the 70,000 people in the highly contaminated regions outside of the evacuation zone, IRSN calculated a dose of 200 mSv in the first year after thecatastrophe. If it is assumed that all of these people remained in the region and did not evacuate, theBEIR model roughly estimates a cancer rate of 2 %. According to this example, about 1,400 people
would be expected to contract cancer due to the additional radiation from Fukushima fallout during thisone year. This does not yet take into consideration the effects of internal radiation through ingestion or
inhalation of radioactive particles. Also, this model does not take into consideration the higher susceptibility to radiation by children and people with immune deficiencies. As no estimates exist regarding thetotal amount of internal radiation exposure through ingestion or inhalation and as the amount of radiation discharged from the Fukushima plant continues to rise (according to TEPCO, atmospheric emissions of radioactive caesium still occurred at 60 MBq/h on January 27 th, 2012),29 calculations of expected cancer cases or deaths are not possible at this stage.
Ultimately, no proper estimates can be made on the basis of the existing data. Large-scale epidemiological studies are needed in order to better understand the effects of internal low-level radiation andto estimate the extent of health effects in the coming decades and possibly even for future generations. It is important that these studies are undertaken by independent researchers and not by organizations with the aim to promote nuclear energy, such as the IAEA.**
As with Chernobyl, the case will not be closed for many decades to come. While short-lived radioisotopes like iodine-131 decay below critical levels within a matter of months, long-lived substances likecaesium-137 or strontium-90 will continue to emit radioactivity and endanger human life for many decades. More than half of the total caesium-137 emitted by the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 is still emitting
radiation, as the half-life of 30 years has not been reached. Also, latency periods of malignant diseases have to be considered in order to get a complete picture of the health impacts. Considering thevictims of this disaster, the claim by several government advisers in Fukushima that the nuclear catastrophe will have little to no effect on people's health is not only unscientific but also deeply immoral.

**According to Article 1, Paragraph 3 and Article 3, Paragraph 1 of the “Agreement between the International Atomic Energy
Agency and the World Health Organization”, the WHO is bound by agreement not to publish scientific articles without consent
by the IAEA. This agreement was approved by the World Health Assembly May 28th, 1959 in resolution WHA12.40 and can befound on the WHO website at http://apps.who.int/gb/bd/PDF/bd47/EN/agreements-with-other-inter-en.pdf

Conclusions:
•

•

•

•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•

•
•

•

The damage to the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant leading to the emission of radioactivity was caused primarily by the 9.0 magnitude earthquake. Further damage was incurredby the ensuing tsunami. Overheating of the core due to total power failure then caused separate nuclear meltdowns in reactors 3 and the spent fuel pond of reactor 4
Atmospheric emissions of more than 30 radioactive isotopes occurred through the explosions
in reactors 1-3 and the spent fuel pond of reactor 4, smoke from the ensuing fires, deliberate
venting of the reactors to relieve pressure as well as the evaporation of massive amounts ofwater used for cooling the reactors
Total emission of iodine-131 in the first three to four days of the Fukushima nuclear disasteramounted to about 20% of the total iodine-131 emissions of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.
Total emission of caesium-137 in the first three to four days of the Fukushima nuclear disasteramounted to about 40-60% of the total iodine-131 emissions of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster
While iodine-131 and caesium-137 are the most prominent radioactive isotopes emitted by
Fukushima, strontium-90, xenon-133, plutonium-239 and more than two dozen more radioactive substances were spread throughout the region as radioactive fallout.
Marine and groundwater contamination was caused by backflow and deliberate discharge ofradioactive waste water from the plant. With approximately 4.7 PBq of radioactive marine discharge, the Fukushima nuclear disaster constitutes the single worst radioactive contaminationof the oceans ever recorded. Dilution and dispersion effects may reduce the amount of contamination in the vicinity of the plant, but only causes the long-lived radioactive isotopes tospread out over a larger area, exposing an even greater population to the effects of radioactive contamination.
Radioactive fallout occurred mainly above the Northern Pacific (79%), with about 19% of the
fallout contaminating Eastern Honshu island, including the Tokyo Metropolitan area and leaving an area of more than 1000 km2 highly contaminated with radioactive isotopes
200,000 people were forced to leave their homes as a 20 km2 zone around the plant wasevacuated indefinitely
70,000 people remained in more than 870 km2 of highly contaminated land outside of theevacuation zone, where they were exposed to an external radioactivity 100 times higher than
the normal background radiation in the first year after the catastrophe.
The risk of developing cancer and other radiation-induced diseases increased proportionally tothe amount of radioactive exposure. There is no lower threshold, as even the slightest amountof radioactivity can cause harmful tissue damage and genetic mutations.
Radioactive contamination has been detected in all kinds of fruits and vegetables grown in theaffected regions as well as in meat of animals grazing on contaminated land. Radioactivity has
also been detected in milk, tea and tap water, even in the Tokyo Metropolitan area. Eating just
500g of contaminated vegetables can cause internal exposure to more than 100 times the normal annual amount of radioactive food content for adults and more than 200 times for children.
Fish and seafood caught in the North Pacific are highly contaminated, with a clear accumulation of radioactivity in animals higher up the food-chain in the months after the disaster.
Washout and bioaccumulation will continue to cause radioactive contamination of marine animals for many years.
Children are most severely affected by radioactivity, as their bodies have a higher sensibility
and as their natural habits expose them to greater dosage. Raising the permissible radioactive
dose level to 20 mSv per year has led to a high exposure of children in Fukushima prefecture.
It is too early and too little data exists in order to estimate the extent of health effects causedby the nuclear disaster. Large-scale epidemiological studies are required in order to determine
the effect and the extent of health consequences for the population. It is important that this research is performed by independent groups not associated with the nuclear industry, such as
TEPCO, JAEA, the IAEA or affiliated organizations.
Claims by scientists affiliated with the nuclear industry that no health effects are to be expected are unscientific and immoral.

Glossary:
Scientific units:
• Bq
• MBq
• PBq
• Sv
• mSv
• µSv
Acronyms:• BEIR
•
•

IAEA
INES
IRSN

•

MAFF
MEXT
NILU
TEPCO
WHO
ZAMG

•
•
•
•
•

•

= Becquerel= Mega-Becquerel (1 x 106 Becquerel)= Petabecquerel (1 x 1015 Becquerel)= Sievert= Millisievert (1 x 10-3 Sievert)= Microsievert (1x 10-6 Sievert)= National Academy of Sciences Advisory Committee on the Biological Effectsof Ionizing Radiation= International Atomic Energy Agency= International Nuclear Event Scale= Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (French Institute for Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety)= Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries= Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology= Norsk institutt for luftforskning (Norwegian Institute for Air Research)= Tokyo Electric Power Company= World Health Organization= Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamic (Austrian Central Institutefor Meteorology and Geodynamics)

References

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

16

17
18

“Damage Situation and Police Countermeasures associated with 2011 Tohoku district - off the
Pacific Ocean Earthquake”, Japanese National Policy Agency, April 15th, 2011www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo_e.pdf“Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update”, IAEA, March 12th, 2011www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima120311.html“TEPCO: Melted fuel ate into containment vessel”, Earthquake Report No. 278 by the Japanese
Atomic Information Forum, December 1st, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1322709070P.pdf
TEPCO/NISA Fukushima Monitoring Data March 11th-18th, 2011www.jca.apc.org/mihama/fukushima/monitoring/fukushima_monitoring.htm“Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update”, IAEA, March 24th, 2011www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima240311.html“Accident in the Japanese NPP Fukushima: Large emissions of Cesium-137 and Iodine-131”,
Austrian Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG), March 24th, 2011www.zamg.ac.at/docs/aktuell/Japan2011-03-24_1600_E.pdf
Stohl A et al. „Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima
Daiichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, anddeposition“, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 11, 28319-28394, 2011www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.html“Table 5 – Preliminary calculation of FP released to the environment in the early stage ofFukushima Ddai-ichi [sic] accident (Bq)” in Attachment IV-2 of “Report of Japanese Goverment to the
IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety – The Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear
Power Plant”, June 2011www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/kan/topics/201106/iaea_houkokusho_e.html
MEXT, “Estimates of Integrated Dose at Each Continuous Monitoring Location based on
Measured Values”, April 24th, 2011
http://eq.wide.ad.jp/files_en/110424map_1800rev2_en.pdf„Spurenanalyse deutscher Messstellen und weiterer Spurenmessstellen weltweit.“ German Federal
Office for Radiation Protection, August 23rd, 2011www.bfs.de/en/ion/imis/spurenmessungen.html“Toxicological Profile Information”, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registrywww.atsdr.cdc.gov
MEXT, “Readings of Radioactive strontium in land soil and plant of Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP”, April
29th, 2011www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/04/29/1305074_0412.pdf“Important Information from Japanese Government, Readings of Dust Sampling”, Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), April 18th, 2011
http://eq.wide.ad.jp/files_en/110418dust_1000_en.pdf
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), “Readings of soil
monitoring”, August 7th, 2011
http://eq.wide.ad.jp/files/110806soil_1000.pdf“Assessment on the 66th day of projected external doses for populations living in the North-Westfallout zone of the Fukushima nuclear accident”, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire
(IRSN), May 23rd, 2011www.irsn.fr/EN/news/Documents/IRSN-Fukushima-Report-DRPH-23052011.pdf“Table D-2 – Half-Lives of Some Radionuclides in Adult Body Organs” in “Toxicological Profile Information Appendix D. Overview of basic radioation physics, chemistry, and biology”,
Agency for
Toxic Substances & Disease Registrywww.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp159-a.pdf“Researchers Assess Radioactivity Released to the Ocean from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Facility” Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, December 6th, 2011www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=7545&tid=282&cid=123049&ct=162“Worldwide marine radioactivity studies (WOMARS) - Radionuclide levels in oceans and seas”,
IAEA, Vienna, 2004
www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TE_1429_web.pdf

19
20

21
22
23
24
25

26
27
28
29
30
31

32
33
34
35
36
37

“Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update”, IAEA, March 31st, 2011www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima310311.html
Weiss D. “Contamination of water, sediments and biota of the Northern Pacific coastal area
the vicinity of the Fukushima NPP”, Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit, Berlin. October
31st, 2011www.eurosafe-forum.org/userfiles/2_2_%20paper_marine%20environment_Fukushima_
20111031.pdf“TEPCO estimates 520-ton radioactive water into sea”, Earthquake Report No. 60 by the JapaneseAtomic Information Forum, April 22nd, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1303469228P.pdf
Buesseler K et al. “Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity”,
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 1;45(23):9931-5
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013920“Results of the emergency monitoring inspections – provisional translation” Japanese Ministryof Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), April 13th, 2011www.jfa.maff.go.jp/e/inspection/pdf/20110413_fukushima_kounago_en.pdf“BEIR VII report, phase 2: Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation.”
National Academies Press, Washington, 2006.
www.nap.edu/openbook.php? record_id=11340&page=8“Calculated Fatalities from Radiation”, Study by the German Society for Radiation Protection andGerman IPPNW, Berlin, September 2011
http://foodwatch.de/foodwatch/content/e10/e42688/e44884/e44993/CalculatedFatalitiesfromRadiatio
n_Reportfoodwatch-IPPNW2011-09-20_ger.pdf“Notice No. 0317 Article 3 of the Department of Food Safety”, Japanese Ministry of Health, Laborand Welfare, March 17, 2011www.mhlw.go.jp/english/topics/foodsafety/dl/110318-1.pdf“Ibaraki Prefecture Agricultural Products Test Results”, Ibaraki Prefectural Government, August 8th,
2011
www.pref.ibaraki.jp/bukyoku/seikan/kokuko/en/links/agriculture_radiation.html“Fukushima Nuclear Accident Update”, IAEA, March 20th, 2011www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima200311.html
TEPCO, “Current Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station”, January 27, 2012www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/f1/images/f12np-gaiyou_e_3.pd“Cesium detected from more Fukushima rice”, Earthquake Report No. 276 by the JapaneseAtomic Information Forum, November 29th, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1322541949P.pdf“Regarding the Limitation of Tap Water for Infants to Intake - Disaster Information 65th - Translation
Edition”, Multilingual Support Center for the Tohoku Earthquake out at Pacific Ocean, March 23rd,2011
http://eqinfojp.net/?p=2999“Results of the emergency monitoring inspections – provisional translation” Japanese Ministryof Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), April 13th, 2011www.jfa.maff.go.jp/e/inspection/pdf/20110413_fukushima_kounago_en.pdf“Analysis Report: Analysis of Matrices of the Marine Environment (Seaweeds)”, ACRO Laboratoire
indépendant d’analyse de la radioactivité, May 22nd, 2011www.acro.eu.org/RAP110522-GPJ-01.pdf“Test Results for Radioactivity on Tea Produced in Shizuoka Prefecture”, Shizuoka Prefectural
Government, May 20th, 2011www.pref.shizuoka.jp/sangyou/sa-340/20110520_test_results_radio_activity.html
Imanaka T et al. “Interim Report on Radiation Survey in Iitate Village area conducted on March 28thand 29th” Iitate Village Area Radioactive Contamination Investigation Team, April 4th, 2011www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/seminar/No110/Iitate-interim-report110404.pdf
MEXT, “Annual doses per person received from nature and man-made source of radiation”, May 4th,
2011
www.mext.go.jp/english/incident/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/05/04/1303717_01_1.pdf
US FDA, “Medical X-rays: How Much Radiation Are You Getting?”, February 19th, 2009
www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm095505.htm

38
39
40
41
42
43
44

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

“WHO Situation Report No 24 - Focus on food safety and water quality”, WHO Western PacificRegion, April 4th, 2011www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/C8F59957-A7B5-4008-B903-79A8BCC6F8DD/0/Sitrep24.pdf“Status of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station”, Earthquake Report No. 34 by the JapaneseAtomic Information Forum, March 28th, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1301366039P.pdf“Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station”, TEPCO Press Release, August 2nd,
2011
www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11080201-e.html“Status of countermeasures for restoring from the accident at Fukushima Daiich Unit 1 through 4”,
Japanese Atomic Information Forum, July 18th, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1310961346P.pdf
Cardis E et.al. “Estimates of the cancer burden in Europe from radioactive fallout from the Chernobyl
accident.” Int. J. Cancer: 119, 1224–1235 (2006)
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijc.22037/pdf
Nuclear Safety Commission, “A trial calculation using the System for Predicting Environmental
Emergency Dose Information (SPEEDI) network system”, March 23rd, 2011www.nsc.go.jp/NSCenglish/geje/2011%200323%20press.pdf
ECRR, “2010 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk - The Health
Effects of Exposure to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation. Annex A: Dose coefficients for themain isotopes of radiological interest”, Brussels, 2010www.euradcom.org/2011/ecrr2010.pdf
MEXT, “Calculation Results and Basis regarding Internal Exposure - Studied in Summarizing
the“Tentative Approach”, May 12th, 2011
http://eq.wide.ad.jp/files_en/110512release1_en.pdf“Notification of interim policy regarding decisions on whether to utilize school buildings andoutdoor areas within Fukushima Prefecture" MEXT, April 19th, 2011www.mext.go.jp/english/incident/1306613.htm
MEXT, “Immediate Measures toward Reducing the Radiation Doses that Pupils and Others Receiveat Schools, etc. in Fukushima Prefecture”, May 27th, 2011
http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/en/important_imformation/0001/“Radiation effect on children's thyroid glands”, Earthquake Report No. 173 by the Japanese Atomic
Information Forum, August 14th, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1313293033P.pdf“Thyroid checkups begin for Fukushima children”, Earthquake Report No. 230 by the Japaese
Atomic Information Forum, October 10th, 2011
“Radioactivity in Fukushima children's urine”, Earthquake Report No. 256 by the Japanese Atomic
Information Forum, November 5th, 2011www.jaif.or.jp/english/news_images/pdf/ENGNEWS01_1320469975P.pdf
Pierce DA et al. „Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer:
1950-1990.“, Radiat Res. 1996 Jul;146(1):1-27.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8677290
Yablokov A etal. “Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environ
ment”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Volume 1181, December 2009http://bit.ly/mo29TZ