“It’s important that we make room for this—forlearning how to get along with one another—in
our core curriculum … ‘People skills’—being
conscious of our cultural differences—is whatmakes businesses succeed and economies
run. If we don’t do this, it’s a disservice to ourstudents, to our country and to our world.”—Amber Makaiau, ethnic studies teacher
Oahu, Hawaii

SPEAK
UP AT
SCHOOLHow to Respond to
Everyday Prejudice,
Bias and Stereotypes

TEACH I NG
TOLERANCEA Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center
400 WASHINGTON AVENUEMONTGOMERY, AL 36104
WWW.TEACHINGTOLERANCE.ORG

A GUIDE FOR TEACHERS
A PUBLICATION OF TEACHING TOLERANCESPEAKUP ATSCHOOLCONTENTS
Letter from the Director . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
IN ADVANCE
Prepare Yourself . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Prepare Your Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
IN THE MOMENTBasic Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18
The Dynamic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
The Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Putting It into Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Putting It All Together . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
APPENDICES
A. For Students . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
B. Role-playing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
C. Changing School Policies
and Taking Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
D. Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

Dear Educator,
Many of the questions we receive for our magazine column “Ask Teaching Tolerance”
are from educators seeking advice about how to respond when someone—a student, acolleague, even a parent—uses biased language or stereotypes in school.

“IN THE END, WE WILLREMEMBER NOT THE
WORDS OF OURENEMIES, BUT THE
SILENCE OF OURFRIENDS.”—MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.

This booklet is our response. It’s for educators who want to develop the skills to
speak up themselves and who want to help their students ﬁnd the courage to speak
up too.
What exactly is biased language, you might ask? Slurs, put-downs and othernegative labels, of course. We know these can start as early as kindergarten when,for instance, a boy is teased about being “girly” because he like dolls. And we’re all
too familiar with the queasy feeling that comes when a colleague makes a joke that
relies on stereotypes for its humor.
No single word covers all this ground. In this guide, we refer to it as biased
language, and to the larger problem as bias. We know that many, if not most, of these
remarks are said in ignorance, but that some reﬂect real hostility.
This guide is for the adults in the school. It offers advice about how to respondto remarks made by students and by other adults and gives guidance for helping
students learn to speak up as well. We believe that modeling the kind of behavior
we want from students is one of the most effective ways of teaching it.
We also know that schools are hierarchies, for the adults and for the students.
So we’ve addressed the ways responding to bias might be affected by the power
relationship involved. It’s relatively easy for a teacher to correct a student who’s
used an ethnic slur, but quite uncomfortable—even fearful—to do so when the slurcomes from a colleague, administrator or parent.
Finally, you’ll notice that we talk a lot about “moments” in this guide. We’retalking about the very short time that passes when somebody says somethingand you struggle with how, or even whether, you’ll respond. These moments areopportunities that must be acted on swiftly. We hope this guide provides you withpractical ideas about how to respond to biased language in the moment, from any
source, in any situation.

Maureen Costello
Teaching Tolerance Director

23THERE YOU ARE.
IN THE CLASSROOM.
IN THE CAFETERIA.
ON A FIELD TRIP.

You’re tongue-tied.
Someone has said something biased that makes you
uncomfortable, or even angry. You want to say something, but
you’re not sure what to say.
It happens “almost daily,” one teacher relates. Maybe it’s one ofyour students. Or it’s a colleague. Or an administrator. And maybe
you laugh along—a forced or awkward laugh—because you don’t
want to be rude. You see students grappling with the same issues.
This guidebook offers tools and strategies to prepare you to speak
up against prejudice, bias and stereotypes at school.
Because whoever it is, and wherever you are, there are ways to be readyfor such moments, ways to make sure that you aren’t caught tonguetied, ways to make sure that you don’t let hate have the last word.

NOTE
This is not an anti-bullying guidebook, though the strategies canbe used to address some forms of bullying behavior. If you are
implementing a speciﬁc anti-bullying curriculum in your school or
district, this guidebook can be used in concert with that effort.
If, for example, you are using the Olweus Bullying Prevention
Program, you can work with the “Circle of Bullying” chart anduse strategies in this guidebook to move “Possible Defenders” andeven “Disengaged Onlookers” to genuine “Defenders.”

4

5

IN
ADVANCEPREPARE
YOURSELF

Questions place a burden on the person who made the remark.
When faced with having to explain a “joke” or support astereotype, people sometimes ﬁnd themselves at a loss. Follow
up with a simple “Tell me more” to help the person move toward
a deeper understanding of why the remark is offensive. If the
speaker falls back on something such as, “C’mon, I was just being
funny,” then you can use one of your ready responses, such as, “I
don’t ﬁnd that funny.”
Practice the phrases aloud. Memorize them. Have them readyfor the next moment.
“The most important thing is to say something,” says Deb
Nielsen, a middle school teacher in Durango, Colo. “Don’t let thesekinds of put-downs pass. Put yourself out there, and you will makea difference.”

You’re an educator. You want to make the world a better place. You
want to create a school environment that is safe and welcoming
for all students—and you don’t want to let moments of bias passsilently. But what to say?
The best way to avoid being stymied when the moment occurs
is to prepare. Simply telling yourself that you are someone whowill speak up goes a long way toward shifting from inaction toaction. So say to yourself:• I am a person who will speak up against bigotry.
• I will not let hate have the last word.
A next step is to develop ready responses that will work in avariety of moments.
• That offends me.
• I don’t ﬁnd that funny.
• I’m surprised to hear you say that.
These phrases allow you to speak up against bias in a simple,
straightforward manner. Sometimes they may open a dialogue.
Other times, they simply allow you to challenge bias and take a
vocal stand against it.

Nielsen offers her own set of standard responses:• Did you mean to say something hurtful when you said that?
• Using that word as a put-down offends me.
• Using that word doesn’t help others feel safe or accepted here.

Simple questions also are a good way to interrupt everyday bigotry.
Keep these in mind as well:• What do you mean by that?
• Why would you say something like that?
• What point are you trying to make by saying that?

8

In AdvanceHow do you say it? You know you’ll speak up. But what about
tone and temperament? Veteran educators say it’s best if you
remain calm and thoughtful. Don’t react with shock. Mostly, just

In Advance 9

be yourself. Be ﬁrm. Be conﬁdent. Know that you are doing theright thing. There is no need to shame or humiliate the otherperson; that tack too often works against you, galvanizing the
behavior instead of changing it. Humor is risky. Sometimes it candefuse a tense situation. Other times, though, it can send a mixed
message. Was something about the bigoted comment funny? Are
you laughing at (and potentially shaming) the speaker, and willthat backﬁre?
Assess the risk of speaking up. You may be branded too
sensitive, too “politically correct,” too something. You may feel thesting of rejection. You may fear retaliation by hostile students orcolleagues. This is especially true when challenging someone inauthority. So consider your safety in any moment when you may
choose to speak up. Is now the best time? Could I handle this in adifferent way, later, that would be safer? Is there someone I trust—acolleague, a peer, a mentor—to whom I can speak about this, to help
me prepare for the next time it happens? Try not to let unwarranted
fear silence you, but do consider the consequences of speaking
up—and weigh them against the consequences of not speaking up.
Understand the dynamics of change. It happens slowly, andsometimes not at all. People can hold on to prejudice with tenacity.
But know this: Speaking up offers a powerful force for good, and
it is felt by all within earshot. If you speak up, others may follow—
and others after them. You may inspire people to ﬁnd the courage
to speak up themselves, in a later moment. Don’t gauge successsolely by whether the person you are addressing changes; change“BE FIRM. BE CONFIDENT.
KNOW THAT YOU ARE
DOING THE RIGHT THING.”

Calling someone a “racist” may feel satisfying, but it also may
reinforce that person’s bigotry, and be counterproductive. You
may never change this person’s behavior—a tough realization inanti-bias work—but that doesn’t mean you should strengthen theircause by behaving badly yourself. “I’m not going to call anotherteacher racist,” says Tracy Oliver-Gary, an ap history teacher from
Burtonsville, Md. “That just throws up a brick wall, and anythingelse I say will be lost.” As the old saying goes, be the change
you want to see—and impart this idea to your students as often
as possible. Keep in mind, too, that your students struggle with thesame issues you do, and more.

is happening all around you, and the ability to marginalize bias is asign of success.
Don’t undermine your efforts. If changed behavior is what you
are after, keep that goal in mind—and let it shape your response.

10

In Advance

In Advance 11

PREPAREYOUR
STUDENTSThis guide aims to help people in school settings handle momentsof everyday bias—when and how to speak up. But if all we dois speak up after the fact, we will forever be responding to the
problem. So, at the outset, we want to put in a plug for prevention.
This work starts in preschool and kindergarten and carries
right on through to high school graduation. It also begins on or
before day one of any school year, when you consider how to build
community within your classroom and how to develop groundrules or guidelines for communication.
Ask yourself, “What climate do I want in my classroom and myschool?” Then ask yourself, “What can I do to promote that kindof atmosphere?”Consider these ideas:

Teachers who provide such language and context tell us that
it often spreads outward from the classroom, into the halls andcafeteria, where they overhear students using language developedin the classroom to speak up against intolerant remarks.
CLASSROOM COMMUNITY
Seasoned teachers tell us that classroom community is at the heartof anti-bias work. Help students build meaningful relationships
within the classroom, and they will be ready and able to speak up
against intolerance for themselves.
Develop ground rules for communication, with student input, atthe outset of the school year. Post the rules prominently, and use
them as a touchstone when an issue arises. By creating language
together (“We want everyone to feel safe in our classroom.”) whena put-down is heard, you have that language ready: “I’m betting
not everyone feels safe in this classroom when you say something
like that, Marcus.”
Teachers who do this work at the beginning of the school year
say that it pays off all year long in improved classroom behavior.
It pays off in other ways, too. Researchers have found thesingle best way to eliminate bias is by having students of different
races, ethnicities, abilities and socioeconomic backgrounds
work together on successful projects. So by creating classrooms
in which that happens, you are doing the upstream work of
preventing future incidents.

LANGUAGE AND CONTEXT
Students at all grade levels need language and context to help
them become people who speak up against bias.
Share with them the ready responses from the previous chapter.
Or, better yet, brainstorm to come up with a list of their own, thenkeep that list posted in the classroom. It’s something you can referto during the year.
In age-appropriate ways, discuss why some words hurt.
Building context (historical, psychological, literary and so on)around such words helps students better understand theirpower to hurt.

12In Advance

In Advance 13

MODELING BEHAVIOR FOR YOUR STUDENTS
Dan Rubin, a high school language arts teacher in Las Cruces,
N.M., encourages teachers to respond quickly and unequivocallywhen a student seeks help with a moment of bias—especially one
in which the student felt powerless to respond.
Rubin shares an example from a time when he served asadvisor to the Gay-Straight Alliance (gsa) at his high school.
At the beginning of the year, he asked gsa members whether
they had any issues or concerns to share. One student describeda moment that had occurred near the end of the previous school
year. He told Rubin that one of his teachers had pulled him aside
as the class was leaving, when the room was nearly empty. The
teacher had told him, “I know a church that can help you withyour ‘situation.’”The student told Rubin that he felt stymied, uncertain how to
respond, so he had said nothing.
Rubin immediately informed the principal via email. The
next morning, the principal sent out an all-staff email reminding
teachers that it was against district policy to discriminate against
any student based on his or her sexual orientation. The text of thespeciﬁc policy was included in the email.
The email concluded: “Let me give you fair warning—whatever
your views may be, telling a student this is absolutely STRICTLY
prohibited in our educational setting.”
Visit tolerance.org for a wide variety of exercises and lessons topromote classroom community at all grade levels.

GETTING STUDENTS IN THE FRAME OF MIND
Students who want to speak up face the same issues that you confronted
as you prepared. When you encourage them to speak up, remember toπ tell them they can do it.
π discuss the importance of tone and temperament.
π consider their safety.
π be patient and believe they can make a difference.
π keep their eyes on the behavior.
π avoid labeling people.

14 In Advance

In Advance 15

IN THEMOMENT
16 In the Moment

In the Moment 17

BASICSTRATEGIES
01 INTERRUPT
Educators from all grade levels and all parts of the countryemphasize this point: You must speak up against every biased
remark, every time it happens. Letting one go, then speaking
up against the next one, sends an inconsistent message: thatsometimes bias is ok; other times it isn’t. Letting the ﬁrst instancego without comment also sends the message to anyone within
earshot that it’s ok to say bigoted things.
So interrupt it. Every time. In the moment. Without exception.
“Stop what you’re doing—whatever you’re doing—and addressit,” says Soñia Galaviz, a ﬁfth-grade teacher in Nampa, Idaho.
So if Galaviz is teaching a math lesson and she hears a student
make a biased remark, what does she do? “I say to myself, ‘Holdon, let’s stop.’ The parallelogram lesson can wait. And I go backto all the work we did the ﬁrst two months of school, discussingclassroom culture and sharing our own cultural stories. I address
it in the moment. I never let it pass. Anytime you let it pass, it’s anopportunity missed.”
Usually, such moments have stopped happening by mid-yearor earlier, based on that early work, Galaviz says. But once, many
years ago, well into the second half of the school year, a student
casually used the n-word in class. “I went ‘Errrrrrh. Hold on asecond.’ I tempered my own response, so I wasn’t angry or out ofcontrol. And I asked why in the world he would say such a thing.”
In the end, Galaviz worked lunch hours and after school withthe student, having him write what turned out to be a 15-page
paper on the origin and history of the n-word. It was a lesson thestudent didn’t forget. When he was in high school, he came back18

In the Moment

and thanked Galaviz for teaching him the negative power and ugly
history of that word.
These moments are rare, Galaviz says. But early, ﬁrm
intervention sends the message that bias will not be tolerated.
Nancy Brakke, a music educator in Tacoma, Wash., admires andencourages these “instant” responses. “No anger, no recriminations,no lecture—just a calm, straightforward ‘stop,’” she says.
Connecticut teacher Christine Sipes describes just sucha moment: “I was a new teacher on lunch duty, and a veteranteacher came up to me and said, ‘Have you heard the one about the
Italian and the …?’ I immediately said, “I don’t like ethnic jokes.’”This may not stop every so-called joke; the person still may
tell such “jokes” to others. But it begins to marginalize thebehavior. The more often it is interrupted, the more likely it will
be curtailed.

02 QUESTIONAs mentioned in the opening chapter, asking simple, exploratory
questions in response to bigoted remarks can be a powerful tool:“Why do you say that?” “What do you mean?” “Tell me more.”
Galaviz, the ﬁfth-grade teacher, also serves as an adjunctfaculty member at Boise State University. One of her students,
preparing to begin student teaching, said to Galaviz, “You can tell
kids whose families don’t have an education.”In the Moment 19

As it turns out, Galaviz, who has multiple degrees and solid
educational credentials, grew up in a lower-middle class family,
the daughter of parents who had to drop out of school to begin
working. She didn’t immediately challenge her student’s comment.
Instead, she said, “Tell me more. Tell me what you mean by that.”
She says that approach accomplished two things. One, it led
the speaker to encounter his own blind spots or bits of ignorance,
as she teased out the reasons behind his thinking. Two, it helped
her better understand his thinking and gave her more time toframe and tailor her response.
Galaviz says that this doesn’t work if you pepper the speakerwith aggressive questions. “What exactly do you mean by that?”
Aggressive questioning can be counterproductive, closing off
communication rather than opening it. The gentle-but-clear “tellme more” approach extends the conversation rather than shutting
it down.
Tone matters in these moments. Your goal is to understandthe roots of the speaker’s prejudices, then help add context andinformation to dispel them.
Don’t think for a moment that we all don’t have some sort ofprejudices. “I call them the ‘uglies,’ and we have to acknowledge
the uglies within ourselves if we’re ever going to make lastingchange,” Galaviz says.
Amber Makaiau is an ethnic studies teacher at Kailua HighSchool in Oahu, Hawaii. She recalls a moment when she faced the“uglies” in front of her students.

Makaiau periodically checks in with students about classroom
culture—what’s working, what’s not working, any issues to discuss.
During one of these check-ins, a student asked Makaiau why
she pushed the Filipino students to talk more during classroom
discussions but did not similarly push the white students.

“WE ARE THERE TOLEARN AS MUCH AS
THE STUDENTS ARE.”“I said, ‘Hmmmm,’ and it surprised me. They had a good point,”
Makaiau says. “They got to see me work through this surprising
realization right in front of them, and I was able to change my
behavior accordingly. Teachers need to be open to that. We are
there to learn as much as the students are.”

03 EDUCATE
Hate isn’t behind all hateful speech. Sometimes ignorance
is at work, or lack of exposure to diverse populations. Other
times, people simply don’t know the negative power behindcertain words or phrases. So a good ﬁrst step in a moment ofbias—particularly if it’s the ﬁrst time you’ve encountered it withsomeone—is to explain why the term or phrase is offensive.
So if someone says, “That’s so lame” or calls someone a “bitch,”
not knowing the discriminatory or sexist power behind thesewords, you can offer background and context to encourage theperson to choose a different expression.
Barbara Hemann, an Iowa teacher who has multiple sclerosis,
shares this example:
My most obvious symptom is my foot dragging as I walk,creating a limp. A student once said to me, ‘What’s withthe gimp?’
I don’t think the student meant to be disparaging in any way,
so I sat down and told him that although I was not hurt by his

20

In the Moment

In the Moment 21

comment, that many people who have a disability would be, andthat he should always be respectful and use respectful language
if he was going to ask someone about a disability. I told him that
I welcomed questions, and I would always take time to answer
those questions.
I think the student left with a lifetime skill.
So unless you are dealing with a longstanding pattern of
behavior, give the speaker the beneﬁt of the doubt, and allowthat person to make a change. “Be kind,” Hemann says. “Nearly
everyone is ﬁghting a great battle.”
It is not your “job” to educate everyone else about bias. People
do need to take responsibility for their own ignorance. Selfeducation—the realization that one lacks knowledge on a subject
and will seek it out on one’s own—is vital.
That said, you are in a school, and education happens inschools. So it’s a natural ﬁt to wrap education around moments ofbias or stereotyping.

clothes were faded and frayed.
“Another teacher pulled the group aside to discuss what
she overheard, explaining to the students that what they were
doing was teasing, bullying and very hurtful toward their peers,
regardless of whether it was to their faces or behind their backs,”
D’Egidio says.
Afterward, the second-grade teaching team collectively
decided to follow up with a community meeting of all secondgraders.
“During the meeting, we did not single out the students who
had done the teasing, but we brought up the issue of teasing
someone about their clothing or something else about themthrough gossiping,” D’Egidio says.
Teachers role-played different scenarios, showing how gossip
can be hurtful. Then they asked students for examples of moreconsiderate behavior.
“The teachers reminded students that words can hurt, whether
they are used in private, overheard or said directly to someone,”D’Egidio says. “We also highlighted the importance of being
an ally, the importance of speaking up against teasing, and theimportance of everyone working together in a community tocreate a safe, caring space for all.”04 ECHO
It’s powerful to be the ﬁrst voice that interrupts bias. It’s also
powerful on another level to be the second, third or fourth voice
to join in the interruption. In group settings, if someone has said
something biased, and not one but four people speak up, theechoing power of those voices can have a multiplying effect.
As the echoing voice, you can reiterate the anti-bias message or
you can thank the ﬁrst person for speaking up—or both!
Consider this, from a high school teacher working with
ninth-graders:Consider this moment, shared by Vanessa D’Egidio, a secondgrade teacher in New York City: A group of second-grade girls
was overheard on the playground, laughing and making negative
comments about classmates’ clothing. They found fault withclothing that wasn’t name brand and laughed at others whose22

In the Moment

I overheard a side conversation where a student said, ‘That’s
so gay.’ I was shocked. I thought that phrase was rarely used.
(Maybe I just wasn’t aware.) Immediately, another girl in thegroup said that was a wrong thing to say. The ﬁrst girl giggled
and said she was just being funny. The second girl said it’s not
funny because it hurts people. I was impressed, so I jumped into
the conversation. I told her, ‘Thank you. I have a lot of respect foryou speaking up like that, and I totally agree with you.’In the Moment 23

THE
DYNAMICSPEAKING FROM
01 AUTHORITY
When you communicate from a position of authority, yourwords often carry more weight—and sometimes you cannot
gauge whether the listener genuinely understands or simply is
unwilling to talk back. If the response is silence, don’t assume
that your message has sunk in. Watch closely to see if behaviors
change, and be ready to speak up again—and again—if needed.
From a position of authority, your words also affect people

to curb slurs and to empower others to speak out against them.
Imagine that same principal delivering a message against slurs at aschoolwide assembly. That’s another case in which speaking from
authority can have a huge impact.
Perhaps more important, if someone in authority does not
speak up, it empowers a different sort of behavior. That lack ofaction tells everyone within earshot that slurs are allowed inhallways, classrooms or the ofﬁce.
A teacher from upstate New York describes the rural, largely
white community in which she lives, where casual and not-socasual bias sometimes is allowed to thrive. But it does not thrive
in her classroom, where she has the authority to set the tone andspeak out. She states it ﬂatly, and takes responsibility for the work:“I am the only person who can stop the bigotry in my classroom.”
A teacher from another part of the country learned her lessonon this issue from moments when she did not speak up.
I often just did not pay attention to hurtful comments or bigoted
behaviors. [Then] I began to make a personal connection to myown life and how bullying had impacted me as a youth. Bullying
and bigoted behaviors have so many layers and are presented inso many ways. This is when I realized that I was contributing to
the problem by not speaking up and speaking out.

“I AM THE ONLYPERSON WHO CANSTOP THE BIGOTRY IN
MY CLASSROOM.”
within earshot. If a principal hears a student in the hallway using
a casual sexist slur and she stops to tell the student that biased
language is not tolerated at the school, others will hear an antibias message from the top. This can have a ripple effect—both24

In the Moment

In the Moment 25

Every week, she found herself in situations where she needed
to speak up against comments that were intolerant. The result?
I discovered that the more I speak up, the more I hear [mystudents] speaking up, too. This is one of the ways we create thatsafe space around us, where our young people know that they are
accepted, appreciated and heard.

02 SPEAKING TO A PEER

There is power in a peer relationship. When a friend or trusted
colleague tells you something, you often hear it more clearly
than if it comes from some other source. Peer relationships also
are problematic. Explaining to another teacher why offensive
language should be avoided might result in a reply along the lines
of “You’re not my boss.”
So there are considerations to be made:• How close are you to this peer? (Strong friendship, mild but
positive acquaintance, nothing more than “hello” in the hallway?)• What is the nature of past interactions? (Happy but shallow,
feelings of real afﬁnity, some tension over other issues?)• How does this person best receive communication? (Written,
verbal, with humor, in group settings, as a quiet aside?)

Weigh your response based on relevant factors. Some examples:
TEACHER-TO-TEACHER
An early-childhood educator from Wisconsin had someone she
considers a good friend speak excitedly about some bargains he
had found at a neighborhood yard sale. She continues:
He said quite conversationally that he had ‘Jewed down’ theowner. I asked what he meant and watched as his face went frompuzzlement (at my ‘ignorance’) to embarrassment (he knowsquite well that I’m Jewish). I let him ﬂounder for a bit and thentossed him a lifeline—his promise not to use that phrase again,
regardless of who is in the room.
STUDENT-TO-STUDENT
A Georgia high school student describes himself as the only
African American in his circle of friends.
An elementary school principal in the Paciﬁc Northwest saysthat he routinely interrupts when he hears biased words being
used—either with teachers or with students.
I step in. I say, ‘Whoa, whoa, whoa.’ The vast majority, withstudents, is kids using words they don’t really understand. They
just know the word is negative, a put-down. So I make it public,
but I don’t make it punitive. It’s a teachable moment, and I wanteveryone within earshot to know it’s not okay to speak thatway here.

26

In the Moment

They do not necessarily say mean-spirited things or bully me
directly, but they always make a point to mention that I am the‘token black.’ I usually laugh it off or ignore it, but recently it
became too much. I was having a bad day, and I could not holdback my annoyed feelings any longer. I began to yell at them
explaining how racist it was that they called me that … and howmean they were being. When I ﬁnally ﬁnished, they stared at me
until one of the boys started laughing. They all laughed and madefun of me, and I realized that all I did was fuel their ﬁre.

In the Moment 27

Looking back, the student says he would have changed
his approach.
I would have confronted it much earlier, when I ﬁrst realized that
I had a problem with the way I was being treated. I should havepulled my friends aside or talked to them individually, explaining
my issues with the situation—not with anger or revenge, but withcalmness.

“I SHOULD HAVEEXPLAINED MY ISSUESWITH THE SITUATION.”

03 SPEAKING TO AUTHORITY
Speaking up to an authority ﬁgure is tricky. It carries risk. Are
you questioning your principal’s leadership skills? Or are you
challenging a senior teacher in a way that might backﬁre? Will you
face punitive reactions? Is the power relationship so imbalanced
that you won’t be heard at all—or worse, will be mocked for being
overly sensitive or “whiney”?

I wrote a letter to my teachers and administrators at the
beginning of the school year, reminding them the power they
have to teach their students not only about academics but alsosocial values, such as respectful language. … I was nervous. I
wondered that their response would be.
A few days after the letter arrived in all teachers’ mailboxes,
Emma’s biology teacher stopped her in the hallway.
He said, ‘I know there have been times I haven’t said anything.
I am sorry, and I plan on calling out more students now.’ I was
speechless. My teacher was coming up to me to apologize; I
thought students always did the apologies. … I am honored tohave gone to a school district that could learn from its students.
Emma’s letter has been republished widely and included in atleast one anthology. Here is a brief excerpt:
Changing the culture of any high school to promote valuesof respect and responsibility does not happen overnight. … It
happens little by little. I can’t and will not tell every single
person I hear use the r-word to stop saying it. I need your help.
In the classroom, when a student uses the r-word, tell them tostop. By saying it in front of the classroom, the entire class knowsthat they can no longer use the word because you don’t tolerate it.

Ask yourself some questions:• Should I write down my issue, present it in the form of a letteror memo? Would that avoid an initial face-to-face confrontationthat could get ugly, allowing the person in authority to absorb themessage before we speak about it?
• Should I seek an ally or allies?
• Am I jumping over a level of authority (going to thesuperintendent before speaking with the principal, for example),and will that lead to problems later?
In 2004, when Emma Fialka-Feldman was in high school, shewrote a letter to teachers and administrators at her school about
the lack of response to the use of the word retard as a casual slur at
her school. Emma’s older brother has developmental disabilities,
and she was angered by the use of the word.
28

In the Moment

In the Moment 29

When they eat in the cafeteria or walk down the hallways they
will also learn that they can no longer say it on school property
because every time they do, a teacher will tell them to stop …
[and] they will bring what the teachers, staff and administrators
taught them into the larger world.

STUDENT-TO-TEACHER
A teacher in the Northeast related this story:
Two teenage girls, both pregnant, are walking down the
hallway of their high school. A teacher passes, clicks his tongue
and says, “I bet neither of you even knows who the baby daddy is,”and keeps walking by. The students say nothing.
What might they have said?
“It’s tough,” the teacher says. “Teachers have power, andstudents know that. They certainly could have said, ‘You can’t talkto us that way,’ but even that might be risky.”
The teacher relating the story suggested that the girls together
might approach an administrator and describe what happened
and ask what can be done. Or they could tell their parents, and theparents could contact an administrator. This work isn’t easy, andthe power involved in some relationships makes it tough to ﬁnd an
effective avenue for change.

30

In the Moment

In the Moment 31

04

SPEAKING TO A PARENT
OR VISITOR
When the person making a biased remark is a parent or a visitor toyour school, ask yourself some questions. Do you have an ongoing
relationship or is this person a one-time visitor? What kind of
relationship does this person have with the school? (Someone
with a history of antagonistic interactions with the school may
require a different response than someone with positive or neutral
relations, for example.)
The basic advice for speaking up to visitors is to be quick, calm,ﬁrm and straightforward. Whenever possible, tie the moment toclassroom rules, school policy or some other principle.
If a father visiting on parents’ night casually makes a biased
remark, a possible reply would be, “Oh, we don’t use that wordin our classroom. Our classroom rules prohibit the use of hurtfulwords.” Don’t engage in a debate over whatever term was used,just refer again to the rules, if needed, and move on.

An ell/Spanish teacher in Illinois held a parents’ night. The
father of one of her Spanish class students told her he insisted that
his son take Spanish so he could “show those Spanish-speaking
factory workers who’s boss.”
I have to say I was taken aback by the tone of the comment. [But]
I am grateful this parent shared his opinion. I added additional
parents’ nights to discuss the presence of immigrants in the
United States and the challenges they face. As evidenced by thesurveys, the meetings ended on a positive note. All participants
indicated they had a better understanding of immigrants.

“CHANGING VALUESTO PROMOTE RESPECT
AND RESPONSIBILITY
DOES NOT HAPPENOVERNIGHT.”
If you have a relationship, draw on that. (“Oh, Maria, I know
you didn’t mean to be hurtful using that word, but we don’t say
hurtful things in our classroom.”)
If it is someone with a history of offensive behavior or
antagonistic relations, stay ﬁrm and straightforward, and move onto the content at hand. (“We don’t use that word in this classroom.
Thank you. Now, we were discussing the art project planned forthe spring …”)

32

In the Moment

In the Moment 33

THE
LOCATION

Some teachers, though, move beyond spoken responses andrequire follow-up action from their students.
“If someone says something inappropriate or offensive in
my class, I stop what I’m doing and have them write a letter of
apology,” says Tracy Oliver-Gary, the ap history teacher from
Burtonsville, Md. “It might be something sexually offensive, orsomething involving bias—anything that may offend anotherstudent in class and make them feel targeted. It happens, and I say,‘Start writing the letter.’”

01 IN THE CLASSROOMIn your classroom you have the advantage of time and authority.
You—working with students—can set ground rules and limits
about slurs and hurtful comments. You can interrupt a moment,
suspend the planned lesson and devote the time needed to discussand explore the impact of what was said.
(We know that you are inundated with mandatory curricula,testing and other things that ﬁll classroom time, and we also knowthat the issue of creating a safe and welcoming environment for
all students is something you believe in—and something worth theclassroom time.)“We talk about intellectual safety in our class, that we’re acommunity where inquiry and reﬂection can happen—and acommunity where everyone can feel safe,” says Amber Makaiau,
the ethnic studies teacher in Oahu, Hawaii.
This gives students the language to speak up throughout
the year, Makaiau says, both in and beyond the classroom. In
the classroom, they can use their shared language (“I don’t feelsafe when you use that term”). Outside the classroom, they are
empowered to speak up against biased remarks because of theunderstanding they have reached inside the classroom.
Makaiau describes the classroom as a place where teachersand students can “unpack” language. “So if someone says, ‘We
have to respect each other in our classroom,’ we don’t stop there.
We take it further, to explore how different people from different
cultures deﬁne respect, and how we balance its many meanings
within the classroom.”
The need for a prompt and strong response to biased remarksin the classroom has been explored earlier in this guidebook.
34

In the Moment

THE TEACHERS’
02 INLOUNGE
The teachers’ lounge is a place where uncomfortable peer-to-peer
situations may arise. Conversation might be more casual there.
Insensitive comments and biased assumptions may be voiced
more frequently.
For example:
A fellow teacher made a joke to other staff about the band
students, referring to them as ‘band fags.’ Needless to say, I told
him it wasn’t funny and certainly not appropriate.

In the Moment 35

A colleague I barely knew expressed sadness that his Jewish and
Hindu students were all going to hell [based on his Christianbeliefs]. I was left breathless. It took me a few seconds to recoverenough to tell him—ﬁrmly but gently—that I did not share that
belief, for a lot of reasons.
The level of the peer relationship must be considered. How close
are you to this person? There also must be some sensitivity about
who else is present, who else might hear any interaction and how
they might react.
All those factors are at play, but the basic strategies still apply.
Do speak up. Don’t antagonize. Do keep your eye on the goal: tokeep communication channels open and help someone realize theeffect of biased comments.
Consider this incident:
Two educators were talking in a teachers’ lounge at a school in
the Paciﬁc Northwest. Each had a sibling from the same family as
a student. The teacher of the younger sibling said, “Those parents
don’t care a thing about their child’s education. They don’t evencome to parent-teacher conferences.”
Hearing that, the second teacher—the one who relates thisstory—took a breath and considered how to respond. She had“THAT’S A BOLD
STATEMENT...”
visited the family’s home and knew some of the pressures andrealities the parents faced: living in poverty, working multiple
jobs, having unreliable transportation. Getting to a parentteacher conference was not a case of not caring; it was a simple
impossibility, given their situation.
“That’s a bold statement, to say a parent doesn’t care about achild’s education,” the teacher says, recalling the moment. “Whatwas going on was that this teacher had not worked to engage
herself with the student’s family, to understand what was going onin that home. She hadn’t done her job.”
Can one teacher tell another teacher, “You’re not doing yourjob”? Not without some sparks.

36 In the Moment

In the Moment 37

So this teacher took a different tack. She told the teacher,“You know, I’ve had a completely different experience with theolder sibling.”
She then described the family circumstances that were
working against the parents’ school involvement.
“I put a face on it. I made it real for her. And she got it. I
saw the light bulb go off, and she realized she’d made someassumptions based on her own thinking about ‘those’ kinds offamilies.”03

IN HALLWAYS AND
COMMON AREAS

His friends and classmates (including those worried about
ﬁtting in or losing his friendship) laughed at his “joke.” Other
students—and adults—within earshot didn’t join in the laughter
but said nothing in response. They allowed cruelty to have the lastword. The student with the hearing aids spoke with the principal
about it, and the principal objected, saying, “We don’t have thatkind of bullying here.”
You have mere seconds in the hallway to speak up. The bustleof students moving quickly between classes creates its own kind ofchaos. So any intervention needs to be quick, clear and pointed.
A teacher overhearing the boy’s remark might say, “Jacob,
that’s not funny. If you say that again, I’ll be forced to call yourparents in for a conference.” That might encourage one of the
bystander students to say, “That’s a stupid thing to say. Stop it.” If
more students joined in, the pressure might be enough.

Hallways—like buses or playgrounds—are places where studentto-student bias can thrive if no one speaks up against it.
A middle school student related this story:
A boy in the hall—a popular kid with lots of friends—routinely
cackled at a girl with hearing aids when he passed her in the hall.
As she got near, he’d shout the line from a cell phone commercial:‘Can you hear me now?’

The hallway is where you need to have your comments ready.
They must be brief, no more than a sentence or two, and they mustbe easily delivered above the din.
Advance strategy also can come into play. Three teachers canpromise each other they’ll all speak up, together, the next timeit happens—because it will keep happening if no one speaks out
against it.
Other speaking up also can occur, including saying comfortingwords to the target of the abuse and asking how she would like tobe supported. (She may be suffering so greatly that she wants noadded attention, for example.)
38

In the Moment

In the Moment 39

Had the principal responded in a more supportive
fashion, he could roam the hall, waiting to encounter a similar
incident himself, then simply take the bully to his ofﬁce andaddress the situation seriously, outlining consequences if the
behavior continued.

04 IN THE CAFETERIACliques, racial and ethnic lines, socioeconomic class—so manyfactors are at work in the cafeteria. National surveys of students
continue to indicate that the cafeteria is the place on campus
where dividing lines are most clearly drawn.
Because of that, a group at one table can easily fall into
biased remarks about some other group across the room. These
remarks are overheard by passersby—other students, teachers,
administrators, cafeteria workers.

that” is more likely to get eye-rolling and whispered sneers than
improved behaviors.
If you sit down and use some of the strategies in this guidebook(“Why do you say that?” “Tell me more.”), you have a better chanceof building a relationship, deepening your own understanding of
the prejudices at work, and tailoring your comments accordingly.
If any of the students are in your classes, you can continue theguidance there as well.
If you have existing relationships with any students at atable where slurs are being casually tossed around, speaking
individually to that student also can be a tactic. “Why do you
listen to that? You know it’s wrong to say those kinds of things.”
Planting the seed that encourages the student to someday speak
up is a good strategy to employ. Again, these are lessons you canoffer in your classroom, with an eye toward improving behaviors
in the cafeteria.

It’s a ripe landscape for speaking up.
Advice from teachers who have spoken up in cafeteria settings
indicates that sitting down is a key strategy.
As with so many things, it’s about relationships. If you sit down
on a regular basis—not just to scold but to get to know students
better—you become more relevant and can have more impact withthese groups. A teacher who just walks by and says, “Don’t say

40

In the Moment

In the Moment 41

PUTTING IT
INTO WORDSGRADE-LEVEL RESPONSES TO THE
USE OF PEJORATIVE OR BIGOTEDTERMS, OR BENIGN TERMS USED WITHA PEJORATIVE TONE OR MANNER.
Community-building work at the beginning of the school year,
including setting ground rules, can help educators deal withstudents who use hurtful language. Below are examples of ageappropriate things for teachers to say.
GRADES PRE K-2
Tina, you know there are words that hurt, right? Words like stupid
or ugly. Well, there are other words that are used to hurt people,
too, and that’s one of them. That’s why we don’t use that word as a
put-down or to hurt someone else. So promise me you’ll stop using
it, okay?

42

Putting it Into Words

There is no need to explore speciﬁc history or politics around theterm being used. Simply place it in context for the student andmove forward with a plan to stop using it, offering appropriate
alternate language for the student to use.
GRADES 3-5
Tina, that word carries more weight than you might know, and it canreally hurt people. There’s a lot of emotion around that word. It’s
been used to attack people, and I know you’re not meaning to attack
anyone, but if someone hears it, they might feel attacked. And we
don’t want that here. We want everyone to feel safe here. So let’s not
use that word anymore, okay?
Depending on the setting and/or the maturity of the student(s),you may want to explore the basic historical context around theterm being used. It may tie in with a social studies lesson or someother instructional materials. “Class, remember when we talked
about words that hurt, well that relates to this lesson …”
MIDDLE GRADES
Tina, I know that you know that word is hurtful, and I’m surprised,and more than a little disappointed, to hear you use it. It has
no place in this classroom, or this school. You know we have anagreement here to not use hurtful language, and I’ll need you tohonor that agreement and stop using that word.
UPPER GRADES
Tina, that doesn’t ﬂy here and you know it. I need you to stop it, or
there will be more serious consequences.
In middle and upper grades, if you have classroom ground rules
and they have been broken, follow through with agreed-uponconsequences. If the student repeats the behavior, deepen theconversation and escalate the consequences—including meetingwith an administrator or contacting the student’s parents. Tie
such slurs or pejorative remarks to classroom lessons wheneverpossible, making historical context relevant and meaningful.

Putting it Into Words 43

PUTTING
IT ALLTOGETHER
PREPARING YOURSELF TO
CHALLENGE BIAS AND PREJUDICE
It’s clear that one voice in one moment does not stop bias. Bias is
insidious, arriving in many forms and many voices. Insults andput-downs, like the rest of the English language, are ever-evolving.
As people use language to create new ways to ostracize and hurtothers, we hope the strategies in this guidebook can be adaptedand adjusted to keep pace.
Every moment that bias goes unanswered is a moment thatallows its roots to grow deeper and stronger. Bias left unansweredis bias tacitly approved. If you don’t speak up, you are saying, inyour silence, that you condone it.

BE PREPARED
Prepare yourself, and help prepare your students. Have handy
phrases you are comfortable saying. Promise yourself that you’ll
speak up in these moments, then follow through.
BE POSITIVE
Don’t just be reactive. Take proactive steps to help create theschool climate you seek.
BE CONFIDENT
There is no need to apologize for speaking up. Don’t let naysayerssilence you. You recognize bias, and you seek to eradicate it. Thisis important work, and you must dedicate yourself to it.
BE ENCOURAGING
Help others prepare to speak up. Encourage the good behavior
you see, especially changed behavior. If someone else has spoken
up before you, be the next voice, echoing that anti-bias message—
thanking the person who has spoken up and encouraging others tojoin in.
WORK TOGETHERThis guidebook is designed for individuals, but know that you
are not alone. Even in the most oppressive school environments,
allies are waiting for you somewhere in the building. Maybe they
are students, other teachers or counselors. Maybe they tried to
speak up once, weeks or months or years ago, but felt too alone tobring change. Seek them out. Band together. Create a campaign
focused on the most prominent problem at your school, and put
it into place, using resources included in the appendices of thisguidebook. There is power in numbers.
The campaign against bigotry involves all of us. Each of our voices
matters, and each is vital to creating inclusive schools—schoolsthat embrace the great diversity of our nation.
So speak up. Don’t let hate have the last word.

In moving forward, consider the basics:
44

Putting it All Together

Putting it All Together 45

APPENDICESAPPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

FOR STUDENTS

ROLE-PLAYING

I am a person who will SPEAK UP against bias.

What will you say? What will you encourage students to say?

INTERRUPT
Speak up against every biased remark—every time, in the moment,
without exception. Think about what you’ll say ahead of time so
you’re prepared to act instantly.
Try saying: “I don’t like words like that,” or “That phrase is hurtful.”

The best way to be ready to speak up is to prepare. The more you
and your students can identify stereotypes and explain why they are
hurtful—or just inaccurate—the easier it will be to respond the nexttime you hear one. Remember, your response can have an impact.

QUESTION
Ask simple questions to ﬁnd out why the speaker made theoffensive comment and how you can best address the situation.
Try asking: “Why do you say that?” What do you mean?” or“Tell me more.”
EDUCATE
Explain why a term or phrase is offensive. Encourage the person
to choose a different expression. Hate isn’t behind all hatefulspeech. Sometimes ignorance is at work, or lack of exposure to adiverse population.
Try saying: “Do you know the history of that word?”
ECHO
If someone else speaks up against hate, thank her and reiterate heranti-bias message. One person’s voice is a powerful start. Many
voices together create change.
Try saying: “Thanks for speaking up, Allison. I agree that word
is offensive and we shouldn’t use it.”48

Appendix

Here are some prompts to get you started, along with backgroundinformation to help you address the inaccuracies.
π An elementary student holds up the corners of his eyes andsays “Ching chang chong ching” as a Korean student walks by.
Making fun of someone’s physical appearance, especially in cases
where the traits being mocked are related to race, ethnicity or
cultural background, is dehumanizing. The same holds true formocking another language.
How can a student bystander respond? What about an adultoverhearing the taunt?
π A parent is angry because your classroom is inclusive. “I
don’t understand why my son has to do group work with aretarded boy. Why aren’t they in their own classroom?”
Because children use the word “retarded” as a slur, it should be
discouraged. The child has an intellectual disability.

Appendix 49

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act mandates theleast restrictive educational environment. In many districts, thatmeans inclusive classrooms. Learn more about it at idea.ed.gov.
Explore whether the parent has curricular or pacing concerns that
prompted the remark and address those.
How can you make it clear that you are attentive to the needs of hischild and also appeal to the parent’s sense of fairness?
π During a service project planting trees at a local park, youhear a group of students laughing as one of them complains,“Why are we doing this? This is what Mexicans are for.”
The idea that any one ethnicity is particularly suited to any one
profession is a form of stereotyping.
Mexicans, like every other group of individuals, occupy a range of
positions in a variety of industries.
Students from middle-class, dominant-culture backgrounds
may enjoy unearned advantages that allow them to feel above
particular tasks, even those performed in the service of others.
What does this student understand about stereotypes and privilege?
What do those who were laughing understand about them?

π On the way to lunch, you hear a girl say to her friends,“C’mon bitches, let’s go eat.”
When the targets (in this case women and girls) of a pejorative
word reclaim it and use it endearingly or as a sign of solidarity, it’soften defended as language re-appropriation.
There is much debate over whether the original sexist, malicious
intent of the word can be undone by this in-group usage.
Sometimes re-appropriated words backﬁre and perpetuate thestereotypes the speaker wishes to debunk. Sometimes the words
are used for shock value.
Why did this student choose that word? What other words could she
have used? How can she be gently stopped?
π A lesbian student comes to you, upset. A classmate told herthat homosexuality is a sin and she is going to hell unless shechooses a different lifestyle.
The right to be safe and welcomed at school applies to all students,
including LGBT students.
Bullying or coercion, even if based on sincere religious belief, has
no place in school.
How would you advise the girl to respond? What else can you do?

π During a staff meeting, some teachers cheer when theprincipal announces that students from a nearby trailer park
will be attending a different school next year.
Teacher attitudes matter. The stereotype that students from aparticular neighborhood, or those who live in poverty, are low
achievers or disciplinary problems can have a real impact on theirachievement and behavior. Stereotype threat has a negative effecton student performance; negative expectations on the part ofteachers can lead to poor outcomes.
This is a good scenario in which to employ the “tell me more”
strategy. Ask role-playing teachers to explain why they clapped.
Be ready to provide information on how teacher expectations
inﬂuence student performance.
What might the principal in this case do? What might an individual
teacher do or say?

50

Appendix

π During group work, you hear a boy say to a girl, “Stop
PMS-ing and just take notes, OK?”
Menstruation and its related side-effects (imagined or otherwise)
are used to marginalize women and exclude them from particular
job functions or decision-making roles. PMS references aresexist barbs used to portray women and girls as over-sensitive,
emotional, inconsistent, irrational and angry.
What was this student trying to convey to his female classmate? Is
there another way to say it?
π You put students into groups and overhear one turn toanother and say, “Good, you can be our token black.”“Token black” indeed tokenizes the black student bycharacterizing him and all his contributions as “token” andAppendix 51

not integral to the completion of the project. This student’s
contributions are marginalized before the assignment even begins.
“Ironic” racism calls attention to race in what the speaker intends
as witty, modern and post-racial ways but really just reinforces
stereotypes and dehumanizes people of color. If the “humor” inthe joke is based upon someone’s group membership, it’s a racist
joke, even if it’s meant to be ironic.
What did this student mean to imply with his statement? How might
the student being singled out as a token feel?
π A boy who likes attention gets laughs by chanting to aclassmate with hearing aids, “Can you hear me now?”

Can the offer of help be disentangled from the bias? Would asking
for the speaker to explain their intent or addressing the issue of
inappropriate language lead to different outcomes?
π A fellow teacher made a joke in the faculty lunchroom
about the band students, calling them “band fags.”
Like the r-word or the n-word, the f-word has no place in awelcoming school; respectful and appropriate language should be
expected of all teachers.
Epithets used to characterize or marginalize a group of students
hurt efforts to build community in school and perpetuate bias, inthis case anti-LGBT bias.

Making fun of someone for a physical disability isn’t funny.
What effect did this student’s humor have on the classroom
environment?
How might the targeted student felt when this comment was made?
π A teacher criticizes a girl about her earring: “Don’t you
realize that those look ghetto?”“Ghetto” is a layered term that has speciﬁc stereotypicalconnotations (urban, poor, racial) and shouldn’t be used in theschool environment except in a historical context, e.g., the Warsaw
Ghetto.
Does the context and signiﬁcance of the comment change if thisteacher is from a background similar to the student? Does thesigniﬁcance change if a student makes the comment?
π During an informal chat, a parent offers to hire a “bunch ofillegals” to paint your classroom.
People are not illegal. Their actions might not have followed thelaw but the people themselves are not illegal. Characterizing
anyone by a single factor is dehumanizing.
Race and class privilege insulates students and parents alike fromthe experiences of those from different backgrounds.
In many states, hiring an undocumented immigrant is a crime.

52 Appendix

Appendix 53

APPENDIX CCHANGING SCHOOLPOLICIES AND
TAKING ACTIONNo Name-Calling Week
Created by glsen and Simon & Schuster Children’s Publishing
nonamecallingweek.org

APPENDIX DRESOURCESPOLICIES
This guide is not about dissecting and rewriting district or school
policies. But policies do matter. Take the time to read yourschool’s policies on biased or discriminatory behavior. Knowing
the policies will inform some of your responses, especially when
behavior has crossed the line.
Finally, what is the policy in your own classroom? Is it
established on the ﬁrst day of school, or do you wait for something
negative to happen and then develop classroom rules?
Consider creating a classroom constitution while also teaching
about the u.s. Constitution. “A New Set of Rules” (available attolerance.org/activity/new-set-rules) can help lead the way.

MORE ON SPEAKING UP
Speak Up: Responding to Everyday Bigotry
This is a companion guidebook to Speak Up at School. Publishedin 2005, it contains valuable advice for all people about addressing
bigotry and hate. tolerance.org/publication/speak/speak

TAKING COLLECTIVE ACTION
Here are three longstanding school-wide campaigns that canhelp create inclusive school environments that challengebigoted behaviors.

United We Stand
tolerance.org/activity/united-we-standMix It Up at Lunch
A program of Teaching Tolerance
www.mixitup.org
Day of Silence
A program of glsen, the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network
dayofsilence.org

54

Appendix

Faced with the Real World, Will You Speak Up?
tolerance.org/blog/faced-real-world-will-you-speak
CLASSROOM LESSONSA Time to Speak: A Speech by Charles Morgan
tolerance.org/activity/time-speak-speech-charles-morgan

Breaking the Barrier
tolerance.org/activity/breaking-barrier
RELATED ARTICLES
Online Hate: Unfriend or Speak Up
tolerance.org/blog/online-hate-unfriend-or-speak
The Courage to Speak Up
tolerance.org/blog/courage-speak

Appendix 55

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Brian Willoughby was a print journalist for 20 years and is aformer managing editor of Teaching Tolerance. He studied
race relations and the history of racism as a John S. Knight
fellow at Stanford University. He and his family live in the
Paciﬁc Northwest.
TEACHER CONTRIBUTORS
Nancy Brakke
Vanessa D’Egidio
Soñia Galaviz
Barbara Hemann

Amber Makaiau
Tracy Oliver-Gary
Dan Rubin
Christine Sipes

And dozens of educators from across the nation
who contributed anecdotes and guidance
REVIEWER
Lecia Brooks, Director of Outreach at theSouthern Poverty Law Center
STAFF
WriterBrian Willoughby

Design Director
Russell Estes

Project Manager
Maureen Costello

Designer
Blake Olmstead

Project Advisor
Michelle Garcia

Photo Researcher
Sunny Paulk

EditorSean Price

Production
Regina Collins
Kimberly Parson

Copy Editors
Kathy Wilmore
Alice Pettway
PHOTOGRAPHY
Masterﬁle (cover, 2, 6, 9, 13, 14, 19, 20, 26, 29, 30, 31, 33, 36, 38, 46)
Corbis (11, 22, 39); Valerie Downes (16, 19); Kristin Murphy (40);
Ron Newkirk (25, 31); Ryan Pﬂuger/Glasshouse Assignment (9, 39);
Tom Sperduto (35); Jim West (22)© 2012 Southern Poverty Law Center. First Printing. This publication was
produced by Teaching Tolerance, a project of the Southern Poverty Law Center.

56

Acknowledgements