African Technology Policy Studies Network

WORKING PAPER SERIES | No. 52
Technological Challenges of Climate
Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insightsfrom Enugu State
Emeka Celestine Nzeh
Ogugua Rita Eboh (Mrs.)

Technological Challenges of Climate Change
Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Emeka Celestine Nzeh
African Institute for Applied Economics,
Enugu State, Nigeria

Ogugua Rita Eboh (Mrs.)
Centre for Entrepreneurship andDevelopment Research,
University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

The African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) is a multidisciplinary network of researchers, private sector actors andpolicy makers promoting the generation, dissemination, use andmastery of science, technology and innovation (ST&I) for African
development, environmental sustainability and global inclusion.
ATPS intends to achieve its mandate through research, capacity
building and training, science communication/dissemination andsensitization, participatory multi-stakeholder dialogue,knowledge brokerage, and policy advocacy.
Published by the African Technology Policy Studies Network
P O Box 10081, 00100 GPO Nairobi Kenya
2011

Published by the African Technology Policy Studies Network

ISBN: 978-9966-1552-1-4

Table of Contents
Acknowlegement

4

Abstract5

List of Acronyms & Abbreviations

6

1.

Introduction

7

2.

Literature Review

10

3.

Methodology

16

4.

Analysis & Preliminary Results

18

5.

Lessons & Implications

30

References

32

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 3

Acknowledgement
This working paper was produced as part of the implementation of the African Technology Policy Studies
Network (ATPS) Phase VI Strategic Plan, 2008 – 2012 funded by ATPS Donors including the Ministerie van
Buitenlandse Zaken (DGIS) the Netherlands, Rockefeller Foundation, amongst others. The authors hereby
thank the ATPS for the financial and technical support during the implementation of the program. The
Authors particularly thank the ATPS Climate Sense Program Director, Dr. Kevin Urama (ATPS); and theProgram Coordinators including Prof. Francis Mutua (ATPS Kenya); Dr. George Owusu Essegbey (ATPS
Ghana), Prof. Eric Eboh (ATPS Nigeria), Dr. Nicholas Ozor (ATPS), and Ms. Wairimu Mwangi (ATPS) for theirtechnical support during the research process.

4 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Abstract
Climate change impacts depend on a range of the climate parameters' changes and on the country'ssocial, cultural, geographical and economic backgrounds. The location and size of, and the characteristics
relief in Nigeria especially Enugu state give rise to a variety of climates ranging from tropical rainforest climate
along the coasts to the sahel climate to the northern parts of the country. Climate change is also threatening
not only the sustainable development of socio-economic activities of any nation but also to the totality ofhuman existence. Nigeria and even Enugu State begun to feel the effects of climate change as thefrequency and intensity of extreme events like droughts and floods have increased.
This climate change has direct impacts on biodiversity, agriculture, water resources, forests, and coastal
areas. Nigeria and Enugu State in particular is currently experiencing increasing incidence of disease,declining agricultural productivity, increasing number of heat waves, unreliable or erratic weather patterns,
flooding, declining rainfall in already desert-prone areas in the north causing increasing desertification,
decreasing food production in central regions, and destruction of livelihoods by rising waters in coastal
areas where people depend on fishing and farming. Climate change is making some land uninhabitable
and affecting water supplies, threatening people's basic needs, impacting negatively to the agricultural
farming systems and triggering displacement.
In 1999 and 2000, more than 200,000 people were displaced by floods in Niger State. In 1988, flooding in
Kano State displaced more than 300,000 people. About a million people living in the low-lying plains of theRiver Niger are considered to be at risk. Flooding is recorded every year in all the states along the Niger Riverand its tributaries, frequently causing disasters. In Enugu no fewer than 300 families have been renderedhomeless in “Ameke Ngwo” and “Ngwo Uno” communities in Udi local council of Enugu state in the year
2009 following the destruction of their houses and economic trees worth millions of naira by a wind storm
which wrecked havoc in the area which is one of the resultant effects of climate change. Presently, due toclimate change there are many agricultural farming systems adaptation by rural communities/farmers in
Nigeria especially in Enugu state.
Farmers in the study area pointed out that the manifestations of climate change are mainly throughdecrease in rainfall pattern, increase in pest infestation in both crops and animals, heavy loss of pastureland/vegetation and premature ripening of crops. Also the result of the findings shows that the farming
systems stopped in the last ten (10) years by the farmers in Enugu state due to climate change include sole
cropping, continuous cropping, shifting cultivation and crop rotation among others.
Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 5

List of Acronyms & Abbreviations
AfDB

African Development Bank

AIAE

African Institute for Applied Economics

AMS

American Meteorological Society

ATPS

African Technology Policy Studies Network

BNRCC Building Nigerian Responses to Climate Change
CFC

Chlorofluorocarbon

FAO

Food and Agricultural Organization

FGDs

Focus Group Discussions

GDP

Gross Domestic Products

IPCC

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

MDGs

Millennium Development Goals

NGOs

Non-governmental Organization

NOAA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

NPC

National Population Commission

PS

Pilot Survey

UKCIP

United Kingdom Climate Impacts Programme

UNDP

United Nation Development Programme

6 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State1. Introduction
1.1
Background information
Climate change has become our new reality. It brings with it changes in weather patterns that can haveserious repercussions for all of us, upsetting seasonal cycles, harming ecosystems and water supply,
affecting agricultural farming systems and food production, causing sea-levels to rise. Climate change
causes floods, landslides, drought and famine. As weather becomes fiercer and storms increase infrequency and intensity, serious socio-economic consequences result. Malnutrition and disease becomecommon occurrences. Climate change has a cumulative effect on natural resources including agricultural
resources and the balance of nature. Its effects are already visible in Enugu state and Nigeria in general.
A variety of food crops are produced in Nigeria and more especially in Enugu state, all dependent on rainfall,
so that where rain is abundant crops dependent on rain are planted, and in drier parts of the country, cropsthat do not require much rain are cultivated. Food production on the whole, however, has not kept pace with
Nigeria's and even Enugu state population increase. Climate change can seriously affect agricultural
production, agricultural farming system and therefore, food security. Enugu State, at present, does not
enjoy food security so is very vulnerable to the effects of climate change.
Land degradation reduces the quality and productivity of land. Many factors can affect it, and climatechange can be one underlying cause, resulting in water and wind erosion of land at different degrees indifferent parts of the state, drought and the creation of deserts, acid and salt accumulation, depletion ofminerals, and heavy-metal contamination. Also, in Nigeria all forms of land degradation occur in different
scales and no part of the country is safe from it. The low-lying nature of Nigeria's 800 km coastline makes it
prone to coastal erosion and flooding, all of which are climate change-induced forms of land degradation.
In the Sahelian zone of Nigeria's north, the most pronounced climate change-related forms of landdegradation are wind erosion and related sand dune formation, drought and desertification. Sheeterosion–which results in the complete removal of arable land–is Nigeria's biggest threat to agriculture,especially in the sandy soil regions of south-eastern Nigeria where Enugu state is located.
Prevailing climate is critical in controlling the ecosystem structure. Forests provide important goods andservices, which include food, non-timber forest products, timber, firewood, the natural regulation ofbiochemical cycles, genetic resources, soil and water conservation, carbon reservoirs, recreation, culturaland spiritual values. Forests play a key role in the functioning of the biosphere and indirectly affect theprovision of many other goods and services. Changes in climatic and atmospheric composition haveTechnological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 7

helped to diminish forests in Enugu state and Nigeria at-large. The upper limits of the tropical rainforest are
already receding. Given the sensitive nature of the forest ecosystems, forest resources have become highly
vulnerable to even slight changes in climate systems. Changes in temperature, precipitation and water
cycle dynamics, therefore, can lead to remarkable forest-cover loss in Enugu State and beyond.
1.2
Problem Statement
Global warning and climate change refer to an increase in average global temperature. Natural events andhuman activities are believed to contribute to an increase in average global temperature. This is caused
primarily by increase in greenhouse gasses such as carbon dioxide which is problem to human existence.
Nigeria is experiencing adverse climate conditions with negative impacts on welfare of millions of people.
Persistent droughts and flooding off-season rains and dry spells have sent growing season out of orbit, on acountry dependent on rain-fed agriculture. Alarm bells are ringing with lakes drying up and a reduction inriver flow in the different parts of the country and even Enugu state. The result is low water supplies for use inagriculture, hydro power generation and other users. The main suspect for all this havoc is climate change.
According to Odey (2009), Nigeria loses about $750 million annually to the depletion of its 350,000 hectaresof forest land by direct human activities and climate change. Also Odey (2009) equally reported that the
Sahara Desert in Nigeria is moving southward at a rate of 600 meters annually. Odey (2009) further addedthat about 100,000 farming families move southwards as a result of the desertification which is the resultant
effect of climate change in the country.
According to Medugu (2009), scientific studies show that snows are disappearing in this part of the world
and that Africa will be worst hit by the effects of climate change which Nigeria and Enugu state in particular ispart of.
Following these development, there is no doubt that climate change is the greatest and biggest challenge
facing mankind today. Its impact has spread beyond the environment, causing serious dislocation in world
economic and social development. In Africa, Nigeria and Enugu state in particular, climate change impact
poses great danger on desertification, damage to infrastructure, sea-level rise, flooding and water salinity
with serious implication. In Nigeria according to Ikeme (2009), climate change and its problems andsolution strategies do not generate greater publicity effects as they are too complex for rather superficial
political talks. Climate change often appears very esoteric but in Nigeria and Enugu state it is real and thiscall for scientific study of this kind. We already have an increasing incidence of disease, declining
agricultural productivity, and rising number of heat waves in Enugu state. There is glaring evidence thatclimate change is not only happening but it's changing our lives. BNRCC (2009) reported that in Enugu state
no fewer than 300 families have been rendered homeless in “Ameke Ngwo” and “Ngwo Uno” communities
in Udi local council of Enugu state following the destruction of their houses and economic trees worth
millions of naira by a wind storm which wrecked havoc in the area which is one of the resultant effect ofclimate change in the state.
Based on the work of IPCC (2001a), the implications of climate change for agriculture in the country and thestudy area can be deduced as flooding and erosion arising from higher rainfalls, rise in sea levels, coastal
problems. Furthermore, there are decreases in crop yields, arising from interplay of biological andecosystem alterations and this is consequence of climate change across the different states of the country
and this call for scientific study.

8 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Agriculture is clearly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change in the study area. Evidence shows thatfarming systems and farming technologies within the state have been changing in responses to the effects
of climate change. This notwithstanding, very little research is done to understand these changes and how
they can be optimized to enhance farmers' livelihoods within the state.
Despite the huge implication of climate change response measures for Nigeria's economy, it is appallingthat there is no visible demonstration of the preparedness of the government to tackle this issue. The
greatest call for concern is that the blueprint for Nigeria's development vision 2010 as reported by Ikeme(2009) fails to give a mere acknowledgement of the importance of climate change to Nigeria's economy, letalone stipulate the development strategy with which to tackle it. The observation above shows that thedanger signals are clear which explain the need for this study.
Given the above enumerated problems and others, it is clear that Nigeria and Enugu state long term
development priority of poverty reduction, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and both the Seven(7) points and Four (4) points agenda of the country and state respectively will be severely constrained if
insufficient attention is paid to current and future climate change of the state through studies of this kind.
1.3
Objectives of the study
The broad objective of the study is to identify and examine the technological and farming systems
adaptation to climate change among farmers in communities of Enugu state, Nigeria.
The key specific objectives of the project are as follows:1. To elicit the level of awareness and understanding of farmers and local communities about the
manifestation and impacts of climate change;
2. To identify the relationships between climate change and adjustments in farming systems andmanagement technologies;
3. To ascertain the patterns and manner of livelihood adjustments that have been implemented by local
communities and farmers in response to the climate change phenomenon;
4. To draw policy lessons for the state government's efforts in promoting sustainable environment andclimate change mitigation and adaptation.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 9

2. Literature Review
2.1
Concept of climate change adaptation
According to IPCC (2007), climate change is a change in the state of the climate that can be identified (e.g.,
by using statistical tests) by changes in the mean and /or the variability of its properties, and that persists foran extended period typically decades longer. As reported by American Meteorological Society (AMS),
climate change is any systematic change in the long-term statistics of climate elements (such astemperature, pressure or winds) sustained over several decades or longer. Climate change may be due tonatural external forces, such as changes in solar emission or slow changes in the earth's orbital elements;
natural internal processes of the climate system; or anthropogenic forces.
Meanwhile, Nasiru Idris Medugu (2009) refers to climate change as a change in climate that is attributabledirectly or indirectly to human activities, that alters the atmospheric composition of the earth which leads toglobal warming.
Furthermore, NOAA National Weather Service (2007) sees climate change as a normal part of the earth
natural variability, which is related to interactions among the atmosphere, ocean, and land, as well aschanges in the amount of solar radiation reaching the earth. For example, it could show up as a change inclimate normal's (expected average values for temperature and precipitation) for a given place and time ofyear, from one decade to the next. “Climate change" involves more than just a change in the weather; itrefers to seasonal changes over a long period of time.
It is important to note that climate change is different from the generally known term like climate fluctuations
or climate variability. These terms denote inherent dynamic nature of climate on various temporal scales.
Such temporal scale variations could be monthly, seasonal, annual, decadal, periodic, quasi-periodic or
non-periodic.
With the prevalent impact of climate change, efforts have been made to discover methods of adaptation.
There exist various views on the concept of adaptation to climate change.
The major scientific body associated with climatic change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), defines climate change adaptation as adjustment in natural or human systems in response toactual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial
opportunities. Various types of adaptation can be distinguished, including anticipatory and reactive
10 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu Stateadaptation, public and private adaptation, and autonomous and planned adaptation.'
Climate change adaptation offered in the inter-agency report, Poverty and Climate Change as seen by(AfDB et al 2003) reported climate change adaptation as the ability to respond and adjust to actual or
potential impacts of changing climate conditions in ways that moderate harm or take advantage of any
positive opportunities that the climate may afford.
UNDP (2005) refers to climate change adaptation as a process by which strategies to moderate, cope withand take advantage of the consequences of climatic events are enhanced, developed, and implemented.
But UKCIP (2003) views the concept of climate change adaptation as the process or outcome of a processthat leads to a reduction in harm or risk of harm, or realization of benefits associated with climate variability
and climate change.
According to (IPCC, 2001), there are several types of climate change adaptation, which are distinguishedinto anticipatory or proactive climate change adaptation (which is the adaptation that take place before
impacts of climate change is observed); autonomous or spontaneous climate change adaptation (which isthat adaptation that does not constitute a conscious response to climatic stimuli but triggered by ecologicalchanges in natural systems and by market or welfare changes in human systems; planned climate change
adaptation is that as a result of a deliberate policy decision, based on an awareness that conditions havechanged or are about to change and that action is required to return to, maintain, or achieve a desired state).
Other types of climate change adaption include; private climate change adaption which is initiated andimplemented by individuals, households or private companies; public climate change adaption which is
initiated and implemented by governments at all levels which in Nigeria include federal, state and local
government; finally is reactive climate change adaptation that takes place after impacts of climate change
have been observed. Of all these named climate change types, the most associated type(s) in the study
area are – private and public climate change adaptation.
2.2
Causes of climate change
According to Botkin and Keller (2000), the phenomenon of climate change is linked to both natural andhuman causes - water vapor in the atmosphere contributes the most to natural greenhouse warming. Water
vapor and other “greenhouse gases” such as carbon dioxide, methane, and CFCs cause the greenhouseeffect by trapping radiant heat emitted at the infrared (long) wavelengths (as opposed to shorter, solar
wavelengths which can pass through the atmospheric gases) from the earth's surface and reradiating itback to the earth's surface. This trapped energy effectively creates an enclosure around the earth's
atmosphere similar to a greenhouse which not only traps heat, but also restricts air circulation that would
otherwise cause cooling.
The natural processes of the causes of climate change are known also as the astronomical and theextraterrestrial factors. The astronomical factors include the changes in the eccentricity of the earth's orbit,changes in the obliquity of the plane of ecliptic and changes in orbital procession while the extra-terrestrial
factors are solar radiation quantity and quality among others. On the other hand, the anthropogenic factor inclimate change involves human activities that either emit large amount of greenhouse gases into theatmosphere that depletes the ozone layer or activities that reduce the amount of carbons absorbed from theatmosphere. The human factors that emit large amounts of greenhouse gases include industrialization,
burning of fossil fuel, gas flaring, urbanization and agriculture. Furthermore, human activities that reduce theamount of carbon sinks as reported by (IPCC, 2007 and Nzeh, 2008) are deforestation, alterations in landTechnological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 11use, water pollution and agricultural practices. All theses human factors have been proven to be
responsible for the ongoing unequivocal climate change or global warming in Nigeria and Enugu state inparticular.
2.3
Climate and climate change perspectives in Nigeria
Nigeria has been witnessing the effects of climate change as the frequency and intensity of extreme events
like droughts and floods have increased.
According to Bala-Gbogbo (2009), the humid tropical zone of southern Nigeria - including Enugu State isalready too hot and too wet, and it is expected to be characterized by increase in both temperature andprecipitation, especially at the peak of the rainy season. Already, temperature increases of 0.2 degree to 0.3
degree per decade have been observed in the various ecological zones of the country, particularly since
1960s.”
Data from the environment watchdog according to Bala-Gbogbo (2009) reveal that for the tropically humid
zones of Nigeria, precipitation increases from about 2 to 3% for each degree of global warming may be
expected. By implication, it is expected that precipitation will probably increase by approximately 5 to 20% in
the very humid areas of the forest regions and the southern savannah areas.
Therefore, climate change will have direct impacts on biodiversity, agriculture (farming practices), water
resources, forests, and coastal areas...also some areas will start receiving heavier and steadier rainfall andsuch areas will inevitably begin to experience increased rainfall induced erosion.”
2.4
Climate change, adaptation and agricultural development in Africa
Several climate regimes characterize the African continent; the wet tropical, dry tropical, and alternating wet
and dry climates are the most common. Many countries on the continent are prone to recurrent droughts,
some drought episodes, particularly in southeast Africa. Deterioration in terms of trade, inappropriate
policies, high population growth rates, and lack of significant investment-coupled with` a highly variableclimate-have made it difficult for several countries to develop patterns of livelihood that would reducepressure on the natural resource base. Under the assumption that access to adequate financing is notprovided, Africa is the continent most vulnerable to the impacts of projected changes because widespreadpoverty limits adaptation capabilities.
Available statistics as reported by Odiugo (2008) shows that except in the oil-exporting countries,
agriculture is the economic mainstay in most African countries, contributing 20-30% of gross domestic
product (GDP) in sub-Saharan Africa and 55% of the total value of African exports. In most African countries,
farming depends entirely on the quality of the rainy season - a situation that makes Africa particularly
vulnerable to climate change. Increased droughts could seriously impact the availability of food, as in thehorn of Africa and southern Africa during the 1980s and 1990s. A rise in mean winter temperatures also
would be detrimental to the production of winter wheat and fruits that need the winter chill. However, in
subtropical Africa, warmer winters would reduce the incidence of damaging frosts, making it possible togrow horticultural produce susceptible to frosts at higher elevations than is possible at present. Productivityof freshwater fisheries may increase, although the mix of fish species could be altered. Changes in ocean
dynamics could lead to changes in the migratory patterns of fish and possibly to reduced fish landings,
especially in coastal artisinal fisheries. Furthermore, several African coastal zones-many of which already12 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

are under stress from population pressure and conflicting uses-would be adversely affected by sea-level
rise associated with climate change. The coastal nations of west and central Africa (e.g., Senegal, The
Gambia, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon, Angola) have low-lying lagoonal coasts that aresusceptible to erosion and hence are threatened by sea-level rise, particularly because most of thecountries in this area have major and rapidly expanding cities on the coast. The west coast often is buffeted
by storm surges and currently is at risk from erosion, inundation, and extreme storm events. The coastalzone of east Africa also will be affected, although this area experiences calm conditions through much of theyear. However, sea-level rise and climatic variation may reduce the buffer effect of coral and patch reefs
along the east coast, increasing the potential for erosion. A number of studies indicate that a sizable
proportion of the northern part of the Nile delta will be lost through a combination of inundation and erosion,
with consequent loss of agricultural land and urban areas. Adaptation measures in African coastal zones areavailable but would be very costly, as a percentage of GDP, for many countries. These measures could
include erection of sea walls and relocation of vulnerable human settlements and other socioeconomic
facilities.
The main challenges likely to face African populations will emanate from extreme climate events such as
floods (and resulting landslides in some areas), strong winds, droughts, and tidal waves. Individuals living in
marginal areas may be forced to migrate to urban areas (where infrastructure already is approaching its limits
as a result of population pressure) if the marginal lands become less productive under new climate
conditions. Climate change could worsen current trends in depletion of biomass energy resources.
Reduced stream flows would cause reductions in hydropower production, leading to negative effects on
industrial productivity and costly relocation of some industrial plants. Management of pollution, sanitation,
waste disposal, water supply, and public health, as well as provision of adequate infrastructure in urban
areas, could become more difficult and costly under changed climate conditions.
Furthermore in Africa climate change exerts multiple stresses on the biophysical as well as the social andinstitutional environments that underpin agricultural production. Some of the induced changes are expected
to be abrupt, while others involve gradual shifts in temperature, vegetation cover and species distributions.
Climate change is expected to, and in parts of Africa has already begun to, alter the dynamics of drought,
rainfall and heat waves, and trigger secondary stresses such as the spread of pests, increased competition
for resources, the collapse of financial institutions, and attendant biodiversity losses. Predicting the impact ofclimate change on complex biophysical and socio-economic systems that constitute agricultural sectors isdifficult. In many parts of Africa it seems that warmer climates and changes in precipitation will destabilize
agricultural production. This is expected to undermine the systems that provide food security (Gregory et al.,2005). Whilst farmers in some regions may benefit from longer growing seasons and higher yields, thegeneral consequences for Africa, are expected to be adverse, and particularly adverse for the poor and themarginalized who do not have the means to withstand shocks and changes.
2.5
Climate change adaptation and agricultural development in Nigeria
Climate change adaptation aims to mitigate and develop appropriate coping measures to address thenegative impacts of climate change on agriculture. Most agricultural systems have a measure of in-built
adaptation capacity (“autonomous adaptation”) but the current rapid rate of climate change will impose newand potentially overwhelming pressures on existing adaptation capacity. This is particularly true given thatthe secondary changes induced by climate change are expected to undermine the ability of people andecosystems to cope with, and recover from, extreme climate events and other natural hazards. It is for thisTechnological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 13

reason that the IPCC encourages “planned adaptation”, that is deliberate steps aimed at creating thecapacity to cope with climate change impacts (IPCC, 2007).
Effective adaptation strategies and actions should aim to secure well-being in the face of climate variability,
climate change and a wide variety of difficult to predict biophysical and social contingencies. In pursuingthis aim, climate adaptation should focus on support for the decision-making and capacity building
processes that shape social learning, technology transfer, innovation and development pathways.
Adaptation is most relevant when it influences decisions that exist irrespective of climate change, but whichhave longer-term consequences (Stainforth et al., 2007).
A key component of climate adaptation involves building resilience, where resilience is the capacity of asystem to tolerate disturbance without collapsing into a qualitatively different state that is controlled by adifferent set of processes: a resilient system can withstand shocks and rebuild itself when necessary.
Over 60% of Africans remain directly dependent on agriculture and natural resources for their well-being(FAO, 2003). Agriculture is highly dependent on climate variability (Salinger et al., 2005) which is why thethreat of climate change is particularly urgent in Africa (Boko et al, 2007).
Despite the reliance of large proportions of the population on agriculture, agricultural development hashistorically not been a priority of governments, with 1% or less of the average national budgets going toagriculture (FAO, 2007). However many donors and NGOs have supported agriculture across the continent
because of this reliance on agriculture and the potential to improve yields.
In spite of the documented exposure of agricultural activities to projected changes in climate, not all
agricultural institutions have made use of climate science data. The current tendency is for institutions toreference climate change as a backdrop to their work as opposed integrating probabilistic future climate
data into their current planning and research approaches. Accordingly it is difficult to distinguish the
documented cases of climate change adaptation in Africa especially in Nigeria from general development
and agricultural practice. The impacts of the East African droughts, for example, have been countered insome instances by digging and maintaining sand dams in river bottoms. The dams allow for continued
cattle watering during dry periods, and have reduced cattle deaths and conflict. It is not possible, however,to establish climate change as the trigger for the construction of sand dams (or other adaptation measures),and the people constructing sand dams do not draw on climate change data.
This apparent disconnect between adaptation efforts and climate data is in spite of efforts on behalf ofclimate scientists to make their work more relevant to agriculture, and the equally concerted attempts by the
impact community to clarify their climate information needs. It should be stated that most farming groups in
Nigeria are naïve as to how difficult it is to understand, interpret and use climate information. It is equally true;
however, that much of the climate modeling work remains focused on gaining greater understanding of
atmospheric dynamics, and does not appreciate the type of issues confronted by farmers or the manner inwhich data needs to be packaged so as to make it accessible to agricultural decision makers.
Meanwhile, agricultural adaptation that has always taken, and continues to take place in Nigeria and Africa
generally, is responding more to perceived climate variability than climate change. This is true of theexamples unearthed in this study, as well as the season forecasting and drought early warning systems that
14 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu Stateenjoy increasing use (especially among livestock farmers) on the country. Very little has been accomplishedin relating crop yield and animal productivity to climate change in the country (Nigeria) and even the study
area, even though the appropriate methodology is available in contemporary literature. Whilst thesesystems have proven their worth for farmers, there is a danger that farmers, agricultural policy makers, crop
breeders and government officials that structure their activities around short term climate variability, will be
exposed by the trend of climate change and its longer-term implications.
Three problems appear to impede the wider use of climate data by farmers and agricultural decision
makers in Nigeria and Enugu state. First, climate change data are not available at the spatial resolution
required by farmers. As such, farmers struggle to reconcile their observations of the weather with climate
projections and lose confidence in the projections. Second, the timeframes (or temporal resolution) overwhich climate data are reported is often of little relevance to farmers. Whilst one might expect policy makers
to consider the implications of a 2050 projection, farmers base their decision on more immediate issues.
Third, there are very few African, Nigeria and even Enugu state scientists with the requisite training andexperience to interpret and apply climate change data in the agricultural context especially in the study area.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 15

3. Methodology
3.1
Study Design
This project is essentially an inventorisation exercise aimed at mapping out some selected communities
within the three (3) agricultural zones of Enugu State that is mostly affected by the climate change. The
project further built the capacity of some selected target group(s)/ individuals in selected communities
within the three (3) agricultural zones of the state. Further more the stakeholders within the state thereafterparticipated in consultation workshop organized within the state to sensitize them more concerningchange climate implications.
3.2
Sampling size criteria
It is important to emphasize that the three (3) agricultural zones of the state correspond to the three (3)different micro agro-ecological zones of the state. The choice of the communities within the three (3)agricultural zones reflects the three (3) different micro agro-ecological zones within the study area.
3.3
Sampling procedure
Purposive sampling techniques were employed to select farming household respondents in each of theselected autonomous communities within the local government area of each of the three agricultural zonesof the state.
In the first stage of the sampling procedure, within the three (3) agricultural zones-Awgu, Enugu andNsukka, two (2) local government areas each were selected making total of six (6) local government areas
for the study.
The second stage involves selection of communities. Two (2) communities were selected from each of thesix (6) government local areas within the three (3) agricultural zones. This gave total of twelve (12)communities.
The third stage was the selection of respondents (i.e. farming household heads). Thirty-three (33) farming
household heads each were selected from each community in both Awgu and Enugu agricultural zones.
But, thirty-four (34) respondents were selected from each community in Nsukka agricultural zone, making a
total number of Four hundred (400) farming household-heads. The greater number of respondents from
Nsukka agricultural zone is based on NPC 2006 which reported that the population of Nsukka zone isgreater than that of Awgu and Enugu zone.
16 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

3.4
Data collection and analysis
Data for this study were collected from both primary and secondary sources. The primary data wereobtained by the use of structured questionnaire. Information sought include among others age of farming
household heads, primary occupation of farming household heads, farming technologies employed by
the farming households (e.g. tillage practices, weed control practices, planting practices and timing,
harvesting practices and timing), farming systems (like cropping pattern, cropping systems soil
maintenance practices) among others. Furthermore, personal contacts, oral interviews and observations
were used during visitation; this aided the primary data collection techniques.
Secondary data were sourced from relevant publications which include: text-books, bulletins, periodicals,
journals, annual reports, seminar papers, unpublished materials of relevance to the study, report
documents from different ministries and even internet search to obtain the most recent information on thesubject matter.
Meanwhile complementary qualitative data were collected by means of focus group discussion (FGD) ineach of the selected communities within the three (3) agricultural zones of the study area. The FGD helped
to find out the community-level indicators of climate change and climate change adaptation in the farming
communities.
The project explored appropriate descriptive statistical tools for the analysis of the whole objectives after
data processing.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 17

4. Analysis & Preliminary Results
4.1
Socio-economic characteristics of farmers
Socio-economic profile of the respondents refers to their personal characteristics and conditions, which
influenced the decision of the respondents toward farming activities. The socio-economic statusconsidered in this study include sex, age, martial status, level of education, major occupation, minor
occupation, types of farming activities carried out, size of farm land among others.
The female-male ration of the respondents were fairly even, with females comprising of 55% of the
respondents (Figure 1). The greater number of females does not presuppose out-rightly that females
outnumber the males in the study area, rather, this can be attributed to the fact that females are considered
to have more access to farming activities than males in the area.

Figure 1: Distribution of respondents according to sex
The bulk of the respondents (45%) is within the 41-60 years age bracket. The old age group ( 61 years)
comprised of 25% of the respondents, while the youth (<25 years) constituted 30% of the respondents(Figure 2). The results of the analysis show that middle-aged men and women dominate farming activities in
the area. It also suggests that few youths are engaged in farming, and are likely opting for non-farm income
generating economic activities.

18 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 2: Distribution of respondents according to age
Generally, education is considered to broaden the horizon of human activities, operation and understandingof the environment including farming activities. Figure 3 indicates that the majority of the respondents (50%)
in the area reported that they had primary education as their highest level of educational attainment. It also
shows that 35% of the respondents did not have any form of formal education. Only 5% of the respondents
reported that their highest level of education is secondary education, whereas only 10% of the respondents
had post secondary education as their highest level of education. This scenario indicates that reduced
productivity could likely be as a result of lack of adequate understanding of the best practices to farming
especially now climate change is affecting farming activities

Figure 3: Distribution of respondents according to educational status
As shown in Figure 4 (below), majority ( 80%) of the respondents have their major occupation as farming,
whereas 10% stated that civil/public service is their major occupation. Also only 5% of the respondents
reported trading and wine-tapping as their major occupation respectively.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 19

Figure 4: Distribution of respondents according to major occupation
Close to three-quarters (70%) of the respondents have access to land lesser or equal to three (3) hectares
for their farming activites. Another 25% of the respondents have access to between four (4) to six (6)hectares of land for their farming activities,and only 5% reported access to between seven (7) to nine (9)hectares of land for their farming activities (Figure 5). The implication of of having a higher percentage of
respondents reporting access to land ≤ 3 hectares for their farming activites shows the increasing pressure
on land as more people depend on a fewer portion of land for farming. Our observation shows that land inthese communities is also being used for other activities like building of both residence and industrial
houses rather than farm activities. The landuse changes could add to the deforestation of the area which isone of the lkely causes of climate climate.

Figure 5: Distribution of respondents by farm size (ha) of land owned
4.2.

Farmers perception and awareness on local manifestations of climatechangeRoughly 67% of the respondents reported that the major cause(s) of climate change in the area is due todeforestation activities (Figure 6). Another 24% thought that industrial activities are the likely cause of climatechange in their communities while only 9% of the respondents agreed that agricultural activities are themajor cause of climate change in their area (Fogure 6).

20 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 6: Distribution of respondents according to cause(s) of climate change
Fifty eight percent (58%) of the respondents stated that the manifestation of climate change in the area ishighest with decrease in rainfall pattern (Figure 7). As 23% of the respondents reported that increase in pest
infestation is the manifestation of climate change, 13% of the respondents said that loss of pastures
land/vegetation is the manifestation of climate change in their community. Finally only 6% of the respondents
confirm premature ripening of crops as the major mainfestation of climate change in the area.

Figure 7: Distribution of respondents according to manifestation of climatechangeThe survey shows that 43% of the respondents (which represents 16 participants) thought that climatechange phenomena was worse over the past ten years in their community in the area of changing/irregular
rainfall pattern. Another 24% of the respondents (representing 9 participants) agreed that climate change
phenomena was worse in their community over the past ten years in the area of increasing temperature orheat. Finally 19% (which represents 7 participants) and 14% (which represents 5 participants) of the
respondents respectively stated that climate change phenomena was worse in their communities over the
past ten years in the areas of harsh weather condition and pest manifestation individually (Figure 8). The
higher percentage of the respondents that stated that changing/irregular rainfall pattern over the past ten
years is the worse phenomena of climate change in their community confirm the views which was
expressed by all the participants in the study area during the FGDs in the study area.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 21

Figure 8: Distribution of respondents according to climate change phenomena
over ten years ago
Figure 9 below indicated that higher number of participants 15 persons reported that increase
frequency/intensity of drought is the recent implication of climate change toward agriculture activities in theircommunity. Also 7 respondents confirmed that decrease in run-fall of rivers/water availability is the recent
implication of climate change toward agriculture in their area. The increase in the frequency/intensity ofdrought in recent time is the indication that climate change toward agriculture might be the reason for themassive failure of crop production especially that of cocoyam last year in the study area which was
confirmed by FGD participants.

Figure 9: Distribution of respondents according to recent implication of climatechange toward agriculture
4.3.
Farming systems and its management technologies on climate change
Our analysis shows that 28% of the respondents have stopped using sole cropping farming system in theircommunity due to climate change in the past ten years, and another 27% have stopped using continuous
cropping farming system due to climate change in the past ten years (Figure 10). It further shows that 21%
each of the respondents in the area under study have stopped the use of both crop rotation and shifting
cultivation respectively as a result of climate change in their communities (Figure 10). Finally, only 3% of the
respondents said they have stopped the use of intercropping due to climate change in the past ten years intheir community. The high percentage (28%) of the participants that agreed that they have stopped the useof sole cropping system may likely be due to high rate of pest infestation reported in the areas (see Figure 7).
22 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 10: Distribution of respondents according to farming system(s) stopped
in the past ten years due to climate change
Figure 11 depicts the distribution of respondents according to farming systems adopted in the area. It
shows that more respondents (18 in number which represents 60%) reported that they adopted mixed
cropping farming system in their communities toward climate change in the recent time. It also shows thatwhile 7 respondents (which is 23%) stated that they adopted mixed farming as their own farming system in
response to climate change in the recent time, only 5 respondents (representing 17%) agreed that they
adopted sole cropping farming system in their communities in the recent time toward climate change. The
implication of the higher percentage of the respondents that accepted that they adopted mixed cropping in
the recent time may be to avoid total crop failures in their farm especially as it relates to pest infestation.

Figure 11: Distribution of respondents according to farming system(s) adopted
in recent time due to climate change
From Figure 12 below, 40% of the respondents reported that the change they adopted in their faming
system is changes in the planting date of crops. Another 26% and 14% of the respondents stated that thechanges they adopted in farming system in their community were changes in cropping pattern andchanges in the harvesting date of crop(s) respectively. Finally as 11% of the respondents reported that thechanges they adopted in their farming system is changes in planting distance only 9% of the respondents
agreed that changes they adopted in their farming system is changes in the storage mechanisms. The
higher percentage of the respondents that reported that changes they adopted in their farming system ischanges in the planting dates of crops confirmed the recent situation in the state that there is delay in rainfall
in the study area hence what is mainly practiced in the study area is rain-fed agriculture.
Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 23

Figure 12: Distribution of respondents according to changes adopted in farming
systemFigure 13 shows that 55% of the respondents stated that the kind of management technologies they use tocombat change in their community is the use of fertilizer. Futhermore, 18% and 14% respectively agreed
that they use pesticides and other means like crude tools for pre/post harvest activities. It also shows that
only 9% of the respondents reported that they carry out tillage operation with mechanized tools as type ofmanagement technology to combat climate change, while 4% of the respondents reported that they use
weedicides as the kind of management technology to combat climate change effects.

Figure 13: Distribution of respondents according to the kind(s) of management
technologies use to combat climate change
4.4.
Farmers' patterns and manner of adjustment to climate change
Figure 14 above indicates that 49% of the respondents' recent adaptation patterns available in adjustingwith climate change in their community is through the change in time of planting. It also shows that 12%
each of the respondents reported that change in irrigation process and changes in land preparation
practices(terracing, contouring, hedges, reservoirs, drainage) are the recent adaptation patterns available
in adjusting with climate change in their community. Another 9% of the respondents stated that change inland and livestock management are the recent adaptation patterns available in responding to climatechange in their community. Lastly, only 6% and 3% respectively reported that change in crop rotation andimprove forecast mechanisms are the recent adaptation patterns available in adjusting with climatechange in their community.
24 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 14: Distribution of respondents according to recent adaptation available
The result of the analysis reported in Figure 15 below indicates that 36% of the respondents reported thatthe major impact of climate change in their farming activities is in the area of reduced productivity of theirfarm produce. Another 29% of the respondents stated that the major impact of climate change in theirfarming activities is in the area of increased labour (Figure 15). Whereas 22% of the respondents stated thatthe major impact of climate change in their farming activities is in the area of increased cost of farming, only
13% of the respondents said that increased in pest and disease manifestation is the major impact of climatechange on their farming activities. This scenario whereby a higher percentage of the respondents agreed
that reduced productivity is the major impact of climate change in their farming activities confirms the reportof the farmers during the FGD that for years now there is reduction in the output of their farm produce due toclimate change.

Figure 15: Distribution of respondents according to impact of climate change on
farming activities
4.5

Impacts of climate change adaptation to farming communities'
livelihood
As can be deciphered from Figure 16 below, only 30% of the respondents agreed that the indigenous
technologies which are in use in their farming community for climate change adaptation is indigenous
weather calendar. From the same figure 16, 27% of the respondents reported that the indigenous
technology which are in use in their farming community is rotational bush fallow. Finally, figure 16 shows thatuse of flood plain farming and use of bird scaring as the indigenous technologies which are in use forclimate change adaptation recorded 14% and 9% respectively.
Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 25

Figure 16: Distribution of respondents according to indigenous technology inuse
According to figure 17 below, 45% of the respondents who confirm that they use only ≤ 20% of theindigenous technology to combat climate change in their community. Also the same figure 17 shows that
35% of the respondents said that the percentage of climate change adaptation techniques which is
attributable to indigenous technology in their farm is between 41-80%. Lastly, only 20% of the respondents
from figure 17 agreed that the percentage of climate change adaptation techniques which is attributable toindigenous technology in their farm is between 21-40%.

Figure 17: Distribution of respondents according to percentage of indigenous
technology techniques in use
Figure 18 shows the distribution of respondents according to types of adaptation to climate change in
respondents farming community. Ten (10) participants which represent 50% of the respondents stated thatthe type of adaptation to climate change in their farming community is shorter growing season crops. Our
results also show that 5 participants each (which represents 25% each of the respondents) said that thetypes of adaptation to climate change in their farming community are longer growing season crops andconstruction of dykes respectively (Figure 18).

26 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 18: Distribution of respondents according to types of adaptation
Thirty six (36%) percent of the respondents reported that the modern technology used for climate change
adaptation techniques in their farming community is by use of crop rotation method, and 32% stated thatmodern technology use for climate change adaptation techniques in their farming community is by seeking
advice from government extension agents (Figure 19). Only 18% of the respondents stated that themodern technology used for climate change adaptation techniques in their farming community is by use ofcrop with small need for water.

Figure 19: Distribution of respondents according to modern technologies
adaptedFigure 20 shows that 35% of the respondents reported that subdivision of large field is the adaptation
mechanisms (toward change in land topography to improve water intake and reduce erosion) used asclimate change solution in their community. Also 30% of the respondents agreed that the adaptation
mechanisms toward change in land topography to improve water intake and reduce wind erosion (asclimate change solution used in their community) are maintainence of water ways and roughening of theland surface. Finally only 5% of the respondents stated that the adaptation mechanism toward change inland topography to improve water intake and reduce wind erosion (as climate change solution used in theircommunity) is by building of wind break.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 27

Figure 20: Distribution of respondents according to adaptation for improved
water intake and reduced erosion
Our findings shows that that a higher percentage of the respondents (90%) reported that water harvesting by
the use of watering can(s) is the means they use in their community to improve water use and availability intheir farming system (Figure 21). Also the same figure shows that only 10% of the respondents stated thatthey use construction of irrigation in peak crop growth as their means to improve water use and availability intheir farming system. The implication of higher percentage of the respondents that stated that water
harvesting by the use of watering can(s) is the means they use in their community to improve water use andavailability in their farming system is attributable to lack of improved ways of farming system in the study area.

Figure 21: Distribution of respondents according to means for improved water
use and availability
More than half ( 61%) of the respondents stated that the use of mulch and straw are the means they use toconserve soil mositure, nutrients and reduce run-off due to consequence of climate change in their farming
community (Figure 22). Furthermore, 23% of the respondents reported that the mean they use to conserve
soil mositure, nutrients and reduce run-off due to consequence of climate change in their farming
community is by avoidance of monocropping. But as shown in Figure 22, only eihght (8%) of the
respondents indicated that they use of crop rotation and lower planting densities

28 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State

Figure 22: Distribution of respondents according to farming practices use toconserve soil moisture, nutrients and minimize run-off

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 29

5. Lessons & Implications
Agriculture is clearly vulnerable to climate change. Therefore there is need for adaptation in agricultural
farming systems at all levels of government within the sub-regional level, country level like Nigeria, state andlocal governments' levels and finally community level.
Although farmers adopted numerous adaptation strategies to climate change affects, some of the farmers
noted that some of the indigenous strategies are increasing tasking and might not stand the test of time.
Historic climatic conditions, trends and variations have prospects for departures from what we use to know
and observe due to climate change. This call for paradigm shift in terms of how we manage climatic risks
and necessitates the need for planned adaptation strategies. It is based on this light that we make thefollowing recommendations:
To address the climate change impacts in agricultural farming systems in Enugu state, and beyond there isneed for significant improvement in agricultural research and extension system of the state. This is because
agricultural research is the operational tools for deploying science and technology to improve agricultural
productivity and ensure effective coping with climate change challenges. The preliminary evidence- as
indicated from our findings of farmers perception of climate change impacts in Enugu - shows that in thelast few years there were climate change impacts in Enugu state. These impacts, according to ourinterviews, were manifested through changing/irregular rainfall patterns, increasing temperature, prolonged
harsh weather, higher pest manifestations, land degradation among others. Meanwhile, the recent
technological responses adapted by farmers in the study area toward climate change impacts were use of
weedicides, use of fertilizer, carrying out of tillage operation with mechanized tools, use of pesticides, use ofcrops with smaller need of water, use of drought resistant seeds, use of flood plain farming, use of rotational
bush fallow etc.
There is need for Enugu state assessment framework on climate change. This will compliment both thenational and global pooled climate change information and thereby generate the state specificcircumstances and scenarios that will guide the choice and implementation of her policy interventions topromote adaptation options by individuals, households, communities and government institutions ingeneral.
Finally, poor adaptive capacity and adaptation reflect the underlying structural and institutional weakness
that already hold down economic growth, reinforce poverty and inequality. Therefore, adaptation impacts of
30 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu Stateclimate change can only be meaningfully and sustainably addressed within the framework of economic
growth, poverty reduction and sustainable development policies of the state and the country. Climatechange adaptation policies and strategies need to be considered as integral component of economic
growth strategy under 4-points agenda of Enugu state.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 31

References
Adejuwon J. O (2006) “Food crop production in Nigeria. II: Potential effects of climate change” Climate
Research Vol 32 229-245.
Agoumi, A., (2003). Vulnerability of North African countries to climatic changes: Adaptation andimplementation strategies for climatic change. In Developing Perspectives on Climate Change: Issues andAnalysis from Developing Countries and Countries with Economies in Transition. IISD/Climate Change
Knowledge Network, 14 pp. http://www.cckn.net//pdf/north_africa.pdf
Bala-Gbogbo, E. (2009). Climate change effects mount in Nigeria:
http://234next.com/csp/cms/sites/Next/Money/Business/5487305-147/story.csp
BNRCC (2009). Building Nigeria's response to climate change.www.nigeriaclimatechange.org
Boko, M., I. Niang, A. Nyong, C. Vogel, A. Githeko, M. Medany, B. Osman-Elasha, R. Tabo and P. Yanda.
(2007). Africa in Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working
Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry,
O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge UK, 433-467.
Eboh, E.C., K.O. Kalu, A.I. Achike, O.C. Ujah, U.S., Amakom, M.O., Oduh, C.E.P., Nzeh and B.K. Larsen.
(2005). Sustainability of economic growth in Enugu state: The role of renewable natural resources. Finalresearch report submitted to the UK Department for International Development.
Eid, H. M., El-Marsafawy, S. M. and Ouda, S. A. 2006: Assessing the impacts of climate change on
agriculture in Egypt: A ricardian approach. Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa(CEEPA) Discussion Paper No. 16, Special Series on Climate Change and Agriculture in Africa, University of
Pretoria, Pretoria, 1-33.
Ezike, J. O. (1998). Delineation of Old and New Enugu State, Published bulletin, Land and Survey, Ministry ofWorks, Enugu.
FAO (2003). Responding to Agricultural and Food Insecurity Challenges Mobilizing Africa to Implement
Nepad Programes. Conference of ministers of agriculture of the African union, Maputo, Mozambique. 1-2
July, 2003.
FAO (2007). The digital soil map of the world: Version 3.6 (January), Rome, Italy.
Gregory, P.J., Ingram, J.S.I. and Brklacich, M. (2005). Climate change and food security. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society B. Vol. 36: 2139-2148.
Ikeme, J. (2009). Assessing the future of Nigeria's economy: Ignored threats from the global climatechange debacle. Africa Economic analysis Vol. 1, No.2.
32 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu StateIPCC (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability.
Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, UK, 7-22.
Mendelsohn, R., A. Dinar and A. Dalfelt (2000) Climate change impacts on African agriculture. Preliminary
analysis prepared for the World Bank, Washington, District of Columbia, 25 pp
National Population Commission (NPC). (2006). Nigeria census figure.
NEST (2004). Regional climate modeling and climate scenarios development in support of vulnerability andadaptation studies. Outcome of regional climate modeling efforts over Nigeria, Nigerian environmental
study/action team (NEST), Ibadan, Nigeria.
Nzeh, C.E.P. (2004). Income and Employment effects of forest product activities among rural households in
Enugu state, Nigeria. An unpublished Msc. Research thesis, Department of agricultural Economics,
University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Nzeh, C.E. (2008). Economic valuation of the losses from deforestation in Enugu state, Nigeria. An
unpublished Ph.D proposal presented to the department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nigeria,
Nsukka.
Oguntoyinbo, J.S (1982). “Climate” in Oguntoyinbo, J.S., Areola, O.O, and Filani, M. (eds) A Geography of
Nigerian Development, Ibadan, Heinemann Educational Books Limited.
Orebiyi, J. S. and C. E. Nzeh. (2002). Financing of Poultry Production by the Nigerian Agricultural and Cooperative Bank (NACB) in Enugu State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences 5(1): pages 2394 – 2395,
Enugu Nigeria.
Reason, C.J.C., S. Hachigonta and R.F. Phaladi, (2005). Interannual variability in rainy season
characteristics over the Limpopo region of southern Africa. International Journal of Climatology, 25, 18351853.
Stainforth, D.A; Downing, T.E.; Washington, R; Lopez, A and New, M (2007). Issues in the Interpretation of
Climate Model Ensembles to Inform Decisions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 365, pp.
2163-2177.
Stige, L.C., J. Stave, K.S. Chan, L. Ciannelli, N. Pretorelli, M. Glantz, H.R. Herren and N.C. Stenseth (2006)
The effect of climate variation on agro-pastoral production in Africa. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 3049-3053.
Strzepek K and McCluskey A, (2006). District level hydroclimatic time series and scenario analyses toassess the impacts of climate change on regional water resources and agriculture in Africa. CEEPA
Discussion Paper No. 13, Centre for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa, University of Pretoria.

Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu State | 33

Thornton PK, Jones PG, Owiyo T, Kruska RL, Herrero M, Kristjanson P, Notenbaert A, Bekele N and Omolo A,
with contributions from Orindi V, Otiende B, Ochieng A, Bhadwal S, Anantram K, Nair S, Kumar V and Kulkar
U (2006). Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa. Report to the Department for International
Development, ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya. Pp 171.
Ukwu I. U, E. A. Anyanwu, E.U.L. Imaga, M. Akwuba, I. Ofong, F. Nwakoby, K. Omeje, O. E. Onyeukwu, B. D.
Umoh and G. Ugwuonah. (1998). Enugu State Poverty Report, Institute for Development Studies Universityof Nigeria Enugu Campus Enugu.
Uyigue, E. and Agho, M. (2007). Coping with climate change and environmental degradation in the Niger
Delta of Southern Nigeria, community research and development centre, Nigeria.
World Bank, 2003. Africa rainfall and temperature evaluation system (ARTES). World Bank, Washington DC.

34 | Technological Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation in Nigeria: Insights from Enugu StateThe African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) is a multidisciplinary network of researchers, private sector actors andpolicy makers promoting the generation, dissemination, use andmastery of science, technology and innovation (ST&I) for African
development, environmental sustainability and global inclusion.
ATPS intends to achieve its mandate through research, capacity
building and training, science communication/dissemination andsensitization, participatory multi-stakeholder dialogue,knowledge brokerage, and policy advocacy.

African Technology
Policy Studies Network
Contact the Executive Director at
The Chancery, 3rd Floor, Valley Rd.
P O Box 10081, 00100-Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: (254 020) 2714092, 2714168,
2714498, 2723800
Fax: (254 020) 2714028
http://www.atpsnet.org

Science, Technology and Innovation
for African Development

ISBN: 978-9966-1552-1-4