Environment Canada

Plan Summary Preview
Company Details
Company Legal Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Company Address
230 Universal Road, Woodstock (Ontario)

Report Details
NPRI ID
11074
Facility Name
TB - Elmira
Facility Address
45 Southfield Drive Drive, Elmira (Ontario)
Update Comments

Activities
Contacts
Select the Facility Contacts

Facility Contacts
Please assign the appropriate contact under each category below.
Public Contact: *Jason Psutka
Highest Ranking Employee
Ulrich Borths
Person responsible for Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation
Lloyd Hipel

Organization Validation

Page 1 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PMEnvironment Canada

Company and Parent Company Information
Company Details
Company Legal Name: *Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.

Company Trade Name: *Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.

Business Number: *850793365

Mailing Address
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 1230 Universal Road

City *

Woodstock

Province/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code: **N4S 7W3

Physical Address
Address Line 1

45 Southfield Drive

City

ElmiraProvince/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code **N3B3L6

Additional Information
Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description

Parent Companies
Empty

Page 2 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PMEnvironment Canada

Facility Validation
The information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the time
the plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note thatany changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in futurereports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here andclick the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered data
will be modified.

Facility Information
Facility Name: *TB - Elmira

NAICS Code: *332999

NPRI Id: *11074

ON Reg 127/01 Id

Facility Mailing Address
Delivery Mode

General Delivery

PO Box
Rural Route Number
Address Line 145 Southfield Drive Drive

City *Elmira

Province/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code: **N3B3L6

Physical Address
Address Line 145 Southfield Drive Drive

CityElmira

Province/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code **N3B3L6

Additional Information

Page 3 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PM

Environment Canada

Land Survey Description
National Topographical Description

Geographical Address
Latitude **43.36600

Longitude **-80.17450

UTM Zone **17

UTM Easting **535870UTM Northing **4825600

Contact Validation
The information in this section was copied from the Single Window Information Manager (SWIM) at the time
the plan summary was created. Please verify the information and update it where required. Please note thatany changes made here will only be reflected in this plan summary. To ensure updates reflected in futurereports, please ensure the information is updated in SWIM. After making updates in SWIM, return here andclick the "Refresh" button to trigger a reload of the SWIM information. Please note all previously entered data
will be modified.

Contacts
Public Contact
First Name: *Jason

Last Name: *Psutka

Position: *Plant Engineering and Environmental Officer

Telephone: *5198804125

ExtFax5196690019

Email: *jason.psutka@tbamerica.com

Mailing Address
Delivery Mode
PO BoxPage 4 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PM

Environment Canada

Rural Route NumberAddress Line 1

45 Southfield Drive

City *Elmira

Province/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code: **N3B3L6Highest Ranking Employee
First Name: *Ulrich

Last Name: *Borths

Position: *Process Engineering Manager

Telephone: *5198804104

ExtFax5196690019

Email: *ulrich.borths@tbamerica.com

Mailing Address
Delivery Mode
PO Box
Rural Route NumberAddress Line 145 Southfield Drive

City *Elmira

Province/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code: **N3B3L6

Person responsible for the Toxic Substance Reduction Plan preparation
Page 5 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PM

Environment CanadaFirst Name: *Lloyd

Last Name: *Hipel

Position: *Project Manager

Telephone: *5195785100

ExtFaxEmail: *lhipel@enviro-stewards.com

Mailing Address
Delivery Mode

General DeliveryPO Box
Rural Route NumberAddress Line 1

1 Union Street

City *

ElmiraProvince/Territory **Ontario

Postal Code: **N3B 3J9Employees
Employees
Number of Full-time Employees: *540

Copy of Certifications of Plan
Copy of Certifications of Plan

Upload Document
A copy of the certification statement(s) from the Highest Ranking Employee and the Licensed Planner(s), for
the Toxic Substance Reduction Plan for which the Plan Summary is being submitted are required. Please
upload a single document containing all certifications.
Do not upload any certification statements that are dated after December 31. If this applies, click "?" (Help)

Page 6 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PM

Environment Canadafor more information.
CommentsWebsite address where the Plan Summary is posted for the public

File Name

Date

Certification page for Plan Summary_ethyl
acetate_FINAL.pdf

21/12/2016 1:08:44 PM

Plan Summary Submission
Electronic Submission
Company Name
Toyota Boshoku Canada Inc.
Facility Name
TB - Elmira
Report Submitted By (authorized delegate)
Jason Psutka
I, the authorized delegate, acknowledge that by pressing the "Continue" button, I am electronicallysubmitting the facility TRA Plan Summary for the identified facility.

Substances
141-78-6, Ethyl acetate141-78-6, Ethyl acetate

Substances Section Data
Statement of Intent
Are the following included in the Facility's TRA Plan?

Use
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the use of the toxic
substance at the facility?: *Yes
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the use of the toxic
substance at the facility: **Page 7 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PMEnvironment Canada

Toyota Boshoku intends to reduced its use of ethyl acetate through process modification, leak prevention,
on-site reuse, improved inventory techniques, and improved operating practices.
If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the use of the toxic substance at the facility: **Creation
Is there a statement that the owner or operator of the facility intends to reduce the creation of the toxic
substance at the facility?: *No
If ‘yes’, exact statement of the intent that is included in the facility’s TRA Plan to reduce the creation of thetoxic substance at the facility: **If ‘no’, reason in the facility’s TRA Plan for no intent to reduce the creation of the toxic substance at thefacility: **Not created.

Objectives, Targets and Description
Objectives
Objectives in plan: *Toyota Boshoku intends to reduced its use of ethyl acetate through process modification, leak prevention,
on-site reuse, improved inventory techniques, and improved operating practices.

Use Targets
What is the targeted reduction in use of the toxic substance at thefacility? *No quantity
targetQuantityUnitor

What is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *No timeline targetyears
orDescription of targets

Page 8 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PM

Environment Canada

Creation Targets
What is the targeted reduction in creation of the toxic substance at thefacility? *No quantity
targetQuantity

UnitorWhat is the targeted timeframe for this reduction? *No timeline targetyears
orDescription of Target

Reasons for Use
Why is the toxic substance used at the facility?: *As a physical or chemical processing aid
Summarize why the toxic substance is used at the facility: **Contained in glue product.

Reasons for Creation
Why is the toxic substance created at the facility?: *This substance is not created at the facility
Summarize why the toxic substance is created at the facility: **Not created.

Toxic Reduction Options for Implementation
Description of the toxic reduction option(s) to be implemented
Is there a statement that no option will be implemented?: *No, we are implementing
If you answered “No” to this question, please add the option(s) under the appropriate Toxic Substance
Reduction Categories (e.g. Materials or feedstock substitution, Product design or reformulation, etc.). If you
answered “Yes” please provide an explanation below why your facility is not implementing an option.
Explanation of the reasons why no option will be implemented: **Page 9 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:53 PMEnvironment Canada

Materials or feedstock substitution
Empty

Product design or reformulation
Empty

Equipment or process modifications
Modified equipment, layout or piping
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *Modified equipment, layout or pipingDescribe the option: *Add Vansol only at gun instead of entire process line to minimize 323LH flushed during solvent cleaning.

Estimates
N/A

tonnes%Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
0.111

7

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Page 10 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PM

Environment Canada

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility
will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Timelines
N/Ayears

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic
substance:
3
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic
substance:

Spill or leak prevention
Improved procedures for loading, unloading and transfer operations
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *Improved procedures for loading, unloading and transfer operations
Describe the option: *Install funnel with lid on clean-out collection bucket

Estimates
N/A
Page 11 of 18

tonnes%Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PMEnvironment Canada

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
60.4

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility
will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Timelines
N/A
Page 12 of 18years
Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PMEnvironment Canada

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic
substance:2
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic
substance:

On-site reuse, recycling or recovery
Instituted recirculation within a process
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *Instituted recirculation within a process
Describe the option: *Reuse dixie cup samples

Estimates
N/Atonnes%

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Page 13 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PM

Environment Canada

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
53

3

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility
will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Timelines
N/A

years

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic
substance:

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic
substance:

Improved inventory management or purchasing techniques
Instituted procedures to ensure that materials do not stay in inventory
beyond shelf-life
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *Instituted procedures to ensure that materials do not stay in inventory beyond shelf-life
Describe the option: *Page 14 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PM

Environment Canada

Procedures to prevent exceeding 72 hours (before going on shutdown, make sure pails are empty), Pour
residue from empty can into new pail (already being done)

Estimates
N/A

tonnes%Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
270

17

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility
will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:
Page 15 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PM

Environment CanadaTimelines
N/Ayears

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic
substance:
3
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic
substance:

Good operator practice or training
Improved maintenance scheduling, record keeping or procedures
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?
Which activities will be undertaken to implement these reduction options?: *Improved maintenance scheduling, record keeping or procedures
Describe the option: *Reduce overspray by reprogramming robot

Estimates
N/A

tonnes%Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:
147

9

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility will be
reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the toxic substance <strong>contained in the product</strong> leaving thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to air</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:
Page 16 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:54 PMEnvironment Canada

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to water</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the total <strong>releases to land</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result of implementing the option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals on-site</strong> (including tailing and waste rock)of the toxic substance at the facility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which the <strong>disposals off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at the facility
will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Estimate of the amount by which total <strong>recycling off-site</strong> of the toxic substance at thefacility will be reduced as a result on implementing this option:

Timelines
N/A

years

Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>use</strong> of the toxic
substance:2
Anticipated timelines for achieving the estimated reduction of the <strong>creation</strong> of the toxic
substance:

Rationale for why the listed options were chosen for implementation
Listed options are technically and financially feasible.
General description of any actions undertaken by the owner and operator of the facility to reduce the use
and creation of the toxic substance at the facility that are outside of the plan
None.
Page 17 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:55 PM

Environment Canada

License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who made recommendations in the toxic
substance reduction plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *TSRP0211
License Number of the toxic substance reduction planner who has certified the toxic substance reduction
plan for this substance (format TSRPXXXX): *TSRP0211
What version of the plan is this summary based on?: *New Plan

Page 18 of 18

Printed on 01/06/2017 7:17:55 PM