POSITION PAPER
20POS02
4 April 2020

Fatigue Mitigation for Flights Affectedby COVID-19 Restrictions
MAINTAINING SAFETY STANDARDS
Aviation is a complex system that relies on many facets working together to achieve a
quality safety outcome. IFALPA has become concerned that the COVID-19 pandemic is
putting pressure on some operators and crew to neglect or suspend some aspects ofaviation safety, such as the standards for crew fatigue management. It is clear that this is
not being done on purpose to undermine the standards of safety we have in place.
Rather, operators and crews may be prioritizing productivity and, as a result,inadvertently allowing safety priorities to become secondary.
As the aviation industry adapts to the restrictions put in place to combat COVID-19, theregular fatigue measures for flights are being pushed to their limits more than normal.
In particular, repatriation flights can be longer than usual and may involve limited or no
opportunities for rest at destination ports. For cargo operations, pilots continuously facesuch restrictions.
The current operating environment is challenging and the typical safety defences thatare in place may not be functioning as well as they normally would. The protection ofsafety now relies more heavily upon adherence to the already-established processes andstandards of the safety systems than during normal operational climates.
National regulations must be followed at the planning stage, as well as ensuring thatplanned FDPs are monitored in actual operations for any unforeseen circumstances.
The IFALPA HUPER Fatigue Management Working Group has provided some initialrecommendations for operators and crews to consider whilst managing the risks offatigue during these operations.

CREW MEMBERS

Flight Preparation- Crew members are often under significant levels of stress, uncertainty, anddistraction due to the current situation. There is worry over possible job loss
resulting from business downsizing and restructuring and general concern due tothe spread of COVID-19. As a result, they may not be sleeping well. It is therefore
important that crew members carefully consider:o Their mental and physical fitness to undertake or continue any duty forwhich they have been assigned.
o If they are allowing thoughts of job loss and financial pressure to alter orinterfere with their regular operational decision-making.
- Crews should be as rested as possible before the start of their duty. Sleeping on
the aircraft does not provide the same quality as sleeping in a hotel room wherelight, temperature, and noise can be managed.
Pilots who are experiencing increased stress can consider reaching out to their Pilot
Assistance / Peer Support program for assistance, where such a program is established.
Onboard Fatigue Mitigations- The crew should communicate with each other to ensure the most alert crew
members perform the take-off(s) and landing(s). This may mean it is safer thatdifferent crew member(s) conduct the landing compared to the crew who
conducted the take-off.
- Inflight rest should aim to maximize onboard sleep during the circadian nightwith priority for in-flight rest being afforded to the landing crew.
- Crews are encouraged to apply appropriate in-flight fatigue countermeasures,considering their operational experiences in similar flight schedules.
- Crews are encouraged to perform controlled rest whenever allowed by the state
regulations and operationally suitable to do so. Remember, this is a tacticalmitigation for higher-than-expected fatigue and should not be planned for.
Fatigue Reporting- All crew are encouraged to write fatigue reports on planned and/or executed
flights whenever fatigue issues are considered relevant.

Page | 2 of 4

OPERATORS
Planning Operations- Operations conducted under “special circumstances” need additional risk
assessment and mitigation. This includes both health and safety aspects inpandemic cases to operate under special circumstances to maintain an
acceptable level of safety.
- Consider the use of augmented crewing in situations not normally requiring it,
and avoid scheduling take-off, and especially landing, during the WOCL.
- Avoid rostering maximum permissible FDP with minimum rest followed by
maximum duty, especially if these duty periods overlap the WOCL.
- Predictive modelling, where available, may provide an indication of any
significant potential problem area in the revised schedules and pairings. With areduction in current flying density, alternate slot allocation requests are unlikely
to be rejected. Operators should aim to prioritise the planning of flights to themost favourable times for crew fatigue mitigation.
- Particular attention should be paid to the return leg. Crew for the return leg
should be afforded the opportunity of adequate rest before the outbound leg.
- The turnaround time may be longer than planned, so consideration should begiven to this possibility in terms of prolonged wakefulness.
- Where possible, the use of crew who have minimal commute times from home /place of rest to place of reporting for duty, should be the preferred rostering
option. Alternatively, provision of suitable hotel accommodation should be made.
- If the route is not familiar for the crew (e.g. it is outside normal company
operations), then operators should assign crew members with a high level ofoperational experience to conduct the flight(s) and provide adequate prefamiliarisation material and briefings to the operating crew.
Crew Fitness for Duty
- Crew should have the possibility to delay the departure if they have been awake
for an extended period prior to a wake-up call (as in normal operational
environments).
Crew Augmentation- Operate with augmented crews, especially if the flights are to start before their
WOCL and are completed after the WOCL. Augmented crewing, especially double
crewing (2 captains and 2 first officers), also provides some additional mitigating
measures if a crew member were to exhibit COVID 19 symptoms during theflight(s).

Page | 3 of 4

Onboard Sleep
Getting as much sleep as possible during scheduled in-flight rest periods is important.
Therefore, rest on board should be segregated from passengers and make use of themost optimal crew rest facilities available to have the best chance of adequate rest.
CONCLUSION
During these times of high pressure and stress for the industry and crews, IFALPA
believes that it is of increased importance to maintain vigilance and an adherence toestablished safety standards. The new risks introduced in operations affected by COVID19 restrictions should be considered together with all the underpinning operationalrisks. Outcomes from these risk assessments should be in addition to, not instead of, anadherence to established safety standards.

©2020 The International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations. This publication is provided for information purposes only, in all cases pilots
should follow their company’s guidance and procedures. In the interest of flight safety, reproduction of this publication in whole or in part isencouraged. It may not be offered for sale or used commercially. All reprints must credit IFALPA.

Page | 4 of 4