Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a
Shepherd Playing the Recorder in an
Arcadian LandscapeGovaert Flinck(Kleve 1615 – 1660 Amsterdam)1654
oil on canvas
139 x 170 cm
signed and dated lower left: “G flinck. f. 1654(?)”
GF-101© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 2 of 10

How to cite
Yeager-Crasselt, Lara. “Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorder in an Arcadian Landscape”(2018). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 3rd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. and Lara Yeager-Crasselt. New
York, 2020–23. https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/ (archived December 2023).
A PDF of every version of this entry is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by apermanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs.

© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 3 of 10

Govaert Flinck’s depiction of an amorous shepherd and shepherdess in the warm,

Comparative Figures

evening light of a rolling landscape captures the lyrical character of the Dutch
pastoral tradition.[1] The shepherd, dressed in a burnt umber robe, calf-high sandals,
and a floppy brown hat, plays a recorder as he gazes longingly at the shepherdessseated beside him.[2] She returns her lover’s gaze with a coy, sideways glance, while
placing a rose on her garland of flowers. Her arm barely conceals the plunging
neckline of her bodice, which she wears over a voluminous, blue satin skirt. A lambgrazes near the pair’s feet, while the rest of the flock is visible beyond the shadyenclosure of the trees.
The Leiden Collection painting is the only multi-figure pastoral landscape that Flinck
executed during his career, and it reflects his familiarity with a broader pastoral
tradition in the Netherlands. While Pieter Lastman (1583–1633) was the first to
depict pastoral scenes, in Amsterdam in the 1610s, the genre most fully developed in

Fig 1. Govaert Flinck, Rembrandt as a
Shepherd with Flute and Staff, 1636,
oil on canvas, 74.5 × 64 cm,
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam, inv no..
SK-A-3451

Utrecht in the 1620s.[3] There, Abraham Bloemaert (1566–1651), Paulus Moreelse(1571–1638), and Gerrit van Honthorst (1592–1656) began to produce half-length
representations of shepherds and shepherdesses, popularizing the convention for
pastoral images that quickly spread to cities such as Amsterdam andDordrecht.[4] Flinck’s own interest in pastoral subject matter began in the mid-1630s
in the Amsterdam workshop of Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–69), evident in his
portraits of Rembrandt and Saskia as Shepherd (fig 1) and Shepherdess from1636.[5] In the Leiden Collection work, Flinck more directly explored the Arcadianthemes of love and music by depicting the figures in the acts of flute playing andgarland making, roles that were traditionally associated with shepherds andFig 2. Abraham Bloemaert, Pastoral
Scene, 1627, oil on canvas, 61.3 x 74.8
cm, Landesmuseum, Hannover, ©
Landesmuseum Hannover –ARTOTHEK

shepherdesses.[6]The Dutch interest in the portrayal of pastoral figures grew from a literary tradition
that espoused the values of the simple, idyllic life of the shepherd. Works such as
PieterCornelisz

Hooft’s

Granida,published

in

1615,

and

Johan

van

Heemskerck’s Batavische Arcadia, from 1637, which were inspired by antique and
Italian precedents, spurred the growing taste for pastoral cultural ideals.[7] The
flowering of this genre was similarly evident in the production of Crispijn de Passe’s
book of engraved pastoral portraits, Les vrais portraits de quelques unes des plus
grandes dames de la Chrestiente, desguisées en bergères, from 1640, as well as in
the Hofdicht, or “country house” poetry and songbooks, of Jacob Cats, Jan Harmens
Krul, and Joost van den Vondel, which were published in Amsterdam in the middle
decades of the century.[8]A number of Dutch artists in this period portrayed the interaction between an

Fig 3. Ferdinand Bol, Portrait ofLeonard Winnincx and Helena van den
Heuvel as Jason and Medea, 1664, oilon canvas, 160.5 x 182.5 cm, The
Hermitage Museum, St.
Petersburg, ГЭ-760, Image is usedfrom www.hermitagemusum.org,
courtesy of The State Hermitage
Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia.

amorous shepherd and shepherdess in a landscape, largely without a specific© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 4 of 10

narrative.[9] In his Pastoral Scene of 1627 (fig 2), for example, Abraham Bloemaert
focused on the relationship between the shepherd and shepherdess in an expansive
landscape.[10] The shepherdess, identified by her crook and gourd, engages theadvances of the humble shepherd who brazenly places his flute under her skirt. Thissense of amorous revelry resonates in Flinck’s painting, although the relationshipbetween the figures is more convincingly portrayed as one of reciprocal pastoral love.
With her ivory skin, blond hair, and revealing neckline, Flinck’s elegant shepherdesswelcomes the flirtatious advances of her male companion. Flinck emphasized thesensuous nature of their interchange by positioning the woman’s circular garland
directly at the end of the shepherd’s flute.[11] The soft, graceful forms of Flinck’s
figures and the earth-toned palette reflect the lyricism of the pastoral tradition and the
evocation of Arcadian themes.[12]The subject and character of the Leiden Collection painting are also consistent withthe broader classicizing interests and style of history painters working in Amsterdam
around 1650.[13] Artists such as Jacob Backer (1608/9–51), Ferdinand Bol (1616–80), Jacob van Loo (1614–70), and Gerbrand van den Eeckhout (1621–74), turned
increasingly to subjects drawn from or inspired by Dutch and Italian pastoral
literature and mythology.[14] For example, in Bol’s Portrait of Leonard Winnincx andHelena van den Heuvel as Jason and Medea (fig 3), from 1664, the couple’s exchange
similarly occurs in the foreground beneath a dense cluster of trees.[15] Although theeroticism of Bol’s image is made more explicit by the woman’s exposed breast, thelarge, solid figures and warm palette suggest the commonalities between Flinck andBol’s compositional and stylistic approaches. Flinck’s broad, sweeping brushstrokes
and looser handling of paint, however, distinguish this work from that of his
contemporary and enhance its suggestive and elegant tone. These qualities would havemade the Leiden Collection painting suitable as a chimneypiece in a sophisticatedAmsterdam home, a setting that reflected the elite, intellectual circles in which Flinck
operated in the seventeenth century.[16]- Lara Yeager-Crasselt, 2018

© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 5 of 10

Endnotes
1. Before its sale at Sotheby’s in Amsterdam in 2007, GF-101 had been in a Dutch private collection sincethe 1930s. In his monograph on Flinck, Joachim Wolfgang von Moltke included a possible second
version of GF-101, previously in the collection of Jan Steen (1625/1626–79) (sale, Alkmaar, 12 August1750). The author has been unable to locate a copy of this auction catalogue to confirm the existence ofa second version. See Joachim Wolfgang von Moltke, Govaert Flinck (1615–1660) (Amsterdam, 1965),
97, nos. 147 and 148a; Werner Sumowksi, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 6 vols. (Landau and Pfalz,
1983–94), 2: no. 635. For Abraham Blooteling’s engraving after GF-101, see Friedrich Wilhelm
Hollstein, Dutch and Flemish Etchings, Engravings, and Woodcuts, ca. 1450–1700, 72 vols. (Amsterdam,
1949–2010), 2: 213, no. 101.
2. A similarly posed flute player can be seen in a drawing by Flinck in the Abrams Collection: Govaert
Flinck, Seated Flute Player, black and white chalk on blue paper, 180 x 280 mm, Maida and George
Abrams Collection, Boston.
3. Lastman executed four pastoral landscapes with figures in the 1610s and early 1620s, which Alison
Kettering has identified as the earliest painted representations of this theme in the Netherlands: Parisand Oenone, 1610, oil on panel, High Museum of Art, Atlanta; Landscape with Pastoral Figures, ca.
1612, private collection, New York; Paris and Oenone, 1619, oil on panel, Worcester Art Museum,Worcester, Massachusetts; and Amorous Pastoral Couple, 1624, Muzeum Narodowe, Gdańsk. The
iconography of Lastman’s paintings—whether they depict mythological narratives or were intended as
pastoral scenes with erotic overtones—has been debated among scholars. The examples in Worcesterand Atlanta, which have been identified as subjects taken from Ovid, suggest the former. Lastman’s
works had little impact on contemporaries, and while they mark an important prototype to GF-101, they
do not share the monumentality and sensual character of Flinck’s work. For Lastman’s pastoral
landscapes, see Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden
Age (Montclair, 1983), 88–89; Peter van den Brink, ed., Het Gedroomde Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in
de Gouden Eeuw (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993), no. 34; Martina Sitt, ed., Pieter
Lastman: In Rembrandts Schatten? (Exh. cat. Hamburg, Hamburger Kunsthalle) (Munich, 2006), no. 7.
Most recently, see the discussion of GF-101 and Lastman in Eric Jan Sluijter, “Out of Rembrandt’s
Shadow: Govert Flinck and Ferdinand Bol as History Painters,” in Ferdinand Bol and Govert
Flinck—Rembrandt’s Master Pupils, ed. Norbert Middelkoop and David DeWitt (Exh. cat. Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Museum) (Zwolle, 2017), 110–12, no. 29, fig. 132.
4. The works of Bloemaert, Moreelse, and Van Honthorst influenced Rembrandt’s first depictions ofshepherdesses in Amsterdam in the mid-1630s, which may be considered the earliest examples of thistype of painting outside of Utrecht, beyond Lastman. See, for instance, Saskia as Flora, 1634, oil oncanvas, 125 x 101 cm, The State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg. For the pastoral tradition in the
Dutch Republic, see Alison McNeil Kettering, “Rembrandt’s ‘Flute Player’: A Unique Treatment of a
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 6 of 10

Pastoral,” Simiolus 9, no. 1 (1977): 19–44; Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art
and Its Audience in the Golden Age (Montclair, 1983); and Peter van den Brink, ed., Het Gedroomde
Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in de Gouden Eeuw (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993).
For Dordrecht, see Arthur K. Wheelock Jr., ed., Albert Cuyp (Exh. cat. Washington, D.C., National
Gallery of Art; London, National Gallery; Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum) (New York, 2001).
5. Flinck, Shepherdess, 1636, oil on canvas, 74.5 x 63.5 cm, Herzog Anton Ulrich-Museum, Braunschweig.
Flinck turned to the depiction of half-length shepherds and shepherdesses on a number of occasions in
the late 1630s and 1640s. See Joachim Wolfgang von Moltke, Govaert Flinck (1615–1660) (Amsterdam,
1965), nos. 127–46; Werner Sumowksi, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 6 vols. (Landau, 1983–94), 2:
nos. 655–56; Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden
Age (Montclair, 1983), 64, 78; Peter van den Brink, ed., Het Gedroomde Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in
de Gouden Eeuw (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993), nos. 23a and 23b. For
Rembrandt’s pastoral subjects, see Alison McNeil Kettering, “Rembrandt’s ‘Flute Player’: A Unique
Treatment of a Pastoral,” Simiolus 9, no. 1 (1977): 19–44; Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia:
Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden Age (Montclair, 1983), 61–62; 95–100. Rembrandt neverrendered a multi-figure pastoral scene in a painting.
6. The association between the shepherd and flute playing can be traced back to antiquity. In Virgil’s first
Eclogue, for example, the shepherd’s occupation was “to brood on his slim pipe over the muse of thewoodland.” The shepherdess’s activity was analogous to that of her companion. Garland making was anactivity of leisure, indicative of the idyllic, rustic life, but the wreath itself also served as a symbol oflove. Both objects carried sexual associations: the flute was perceived to have phallic connotations,while the wreath or garland was a symbol of the female genitals, as well as a woman’s virginity. See
Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden Age(Montclair, 1983), 92–95; and Eric Jan Sluijter, “De entree van de amoureuze herderidylle in de NoordNederlandse prent- en schilderkunst,” in Het Gedroomde Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in de Gouden
Eeuw, ed. Peter van den Brink (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993), 33–56.
7. In the visual tradition, many Dutch images of shepherds had their roots in the sixteenth-century
Venetian concert champêtre, as seen in works by Giorgione and Palma Vecchio. As Alison McNeil
Kettering has noted, Dutch images tended to differ from the melancholic mood of their Italianpredecessors. Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden
Age (Montclair, 1983), 92–95.
8. These texts predominantly appeared in the period between 1618 and 1648. For a summary of Dutch
pastoral literature, as well as Crispijn de Passe’s engravings, see Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch
Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audience in the Golden Age (Montclair, 1983), 19–31, 75–77; and Petervan den Brink, ed., Het Gedroomde Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in de Gouden Eeuw (Exh. cat. Utrecht,
Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993).
9. For a discussion of the emergence of the image of the shepherd pair in a landscape in the Netherlands,
see Eric Jan Sluijter, “De entree van de amoureuze herderidylle in de Noord-Nederlandse prent- en© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 7 of 10

schilderkunst,” in Het Gedroomde Land: Pastorale schilderkunst in de Gouden Eeuw, ed. Peter van den
Brink (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993), 33–56. An early example is Jacob Matham
after Hendrick Goltzius, Cordion and Sylvia, ca. 1600, engraving, 477 x 343 mm, Art Institute ofChicago.
10. For Bloemaert’s image, see Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audiencein the Golden Age (Montclair, 1983), 87; Peter van den Brink, ed., Het Gedroomde Land: Pastoraleschilderkunst in de Gouden Eeuw (Exh. cat. Utrecht, Centraal Museum) (Zwolle, 1993), no. 34. Abraham
Bloemaert based his painting on a print series of pastoral subjects executed by Cornelis Bloemaert II(1603–84) in around 1625, titled Otia delectant.
11. The eroticism of this gesture likely reflected Flinck’s awareness of Rembrandt’s etching of a Flute
Player from 1642, a work that Alison McNeil Kettering first associated with GF-101 in 1977. Although
Kettering described certain iconographic and compositional similarities between Rembrandt’s andFlinck’s images, she did not point out the considerable differences between them. In Rembrandt’s print,
the grisly looking shepherd lies on his stomach playing a transverse flute as he looks unabashedly up the
shepherdess’s skirt. Although both forms of the flute—the upright recorder, or flute à bec, and thehorizontally played transverse flute—had implied phallic connotations, Rembrandt’s positioning of the
shepherd at the feet of the shepherdess and the suggestive angle of the flute conveyed a more explicit
sexual intent. As Kettering has argued, this act of “crude voyeurism” was a significant departure fromtraditional pastoral iconography, and it is markedly absent from Flinck’s image. See Alison McNeil
Kettering, “Rembrandt’s ‘Flute Player’: A Unique Treatment of a Pastoral,” Simiolus 9, no. 1 (1977):
19–44, particularly 41–42; Werner Sumowksi, Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler, 6 vols. (Landau andPfalz, 1983–94), 2: no. 635; Alison McNeil Kettering, The Dutch Arcadia: Pastoral Art and Its Audiencein the Golden Age (Montclair, 1983), 88, 98, 162 n. 68. Flinck’s image also anticipates the more overtly
erotic pastoral images that appeared after 1650 in the work of genre painters such as Caspar Netscher(ca. 1639[?]–84) and Adriaen van der Werff (1659–1722). See, for instance, Adriaen van derWerff, Shepherd and Shepherdess in a Landscape, 1689, oil on panel, 59 x 48 cm, Gemäldegalerie
Dresden.
12. This approach is particularly evident in Flinck’s handling of the shepherd. Infrared images reveal a fluidand confident underdrawing for the shepherd’s head, hair, and garment. See Technical Summary forfurther discussion.
13. Although the last digit of the date in the lower-left corner is indistinct, this work has consistently been
dated to 1654, a date that corresponds to Flinck’s more mature, classicizing style. In that same year,
Flinck received a commission to complete an allegorical portrait for Amalia van Solms’s apartment at
the Huis den Bosch, Hope Comes to Amalia van Solms at the Tomb of Frederik Hendrik, 1654, oil oncanvas, 307 x 189 cm, Royal Cabinet of Paintings, Mauritshuis, The Hague.
14. See, for instance, Jacob Backer, Granida and Daiflo, ca. 1637, oil on canvas, 125 x 161.5 cm, The State
Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg; Jacob van Loo, Amarillis Crowning Mirtillo, ca. 1650, oil on canvas,
161 x 192 cm, Instituut Collectie Nederland, Amsterdam.
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 8 of 10

15. Bol’s painting, which was formerly known as Bacchus and Ariadne, has been identified more recently as
a portrait historié of the Amsterdam couple Leonard Winnincx (1616–91) and his wife, Helena van den
Heuvel (1638–98). The couple married in 1664. Their choice to be portrayed in the guise of
mythological figures—and Frans Grijzenhout’s recent determination that the painting hung prominently
above the mantel in their salon—demonstrates the popularity and currency of these themes among
Amsterdam’s elite in the second half of the seventeenth century. See Frans Grijzenhout, “Ferdinand
Bol’s ‘portrait historié’ in the Hermitage: Identification and Interpretation,” Simiolus 34, no. 1(2009/2010), 33–49.
16. The size and format of GF-101 suggest that it was intended to be hung above a chimney or over mantel.
Its pastoral subject matter would have easily found a receptive audience in the sophisticated circle ofpatrons—perhaps courtly circles—that Flinck knew and worked for in this period. See Tom van derMolen and Valentina Vlasic, Govert Flinck—Reflecting History (Exh. cat. Kleve, Museum Kurhaus
Kleve) (Kleve, 2015), 127, 137, no. 21; and Eric Jan Sluijter, “Out of Rembrandt’s Shadow: Govert
Flinck and Ferdinand Bol as History Painters,” in Ferdinand Bol and Govert Flinck—Rembrandt’s Master
Pupils, ed. Norbert Middelkoop and David DeWitt (Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Amsterdam Museum;
Amsterdam, Museum Het Rembrandthuis) (Zwolle, 2017), 110–12, cat. no. 29, fig. 132. For Flinck’s
networks as a painter, see Erna Kok, “Govert Flinck, Ferdinand Bol and Their Network of Influential
Clients,” in Ferdinand Bol and Govert Flinck—Rembrandt’s Master Pupils, ed. Norbert Middelkoop andDavid DeWitt (Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Amsterdam Museum; Amsterdam, Museum Het Rembrandthuis)(Zwolle, 2017), 58–79.

ProvenancePossibly Jan Steen (1625/6–79), Leiden (his sale, Alkmaar, 12 August 1750, no. 8).
Anthonie H.G. Fokker (1890–1939), by 1938; thence by descent (sale, Amsterdam, 8 May 2007, no. 73[Johnny van Haeften Ltd., London]).
From whom acquired by the present owner in 2007.

Exhibition History
Amsterdam, Rijksmuseum, 1939–45, on loan with the permanent collection [lent by the heirs of A.H.G.
Fokker].
Kleve, Museum Kurhaus Kleve, “Govert Flinck—Reflecting History,” 4 October 2015–17 January
2016, no. 21 [lent by the present owner].
© 2024 The Leiden Collection

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 9 of 10

Amsterdam, Amsterdam Museum; Amsterdam, Museum Het Rembrandthuis. “Ferdinand Bol andGovert Flinck—Rembrandt’s Master Pupils, 13 October 2017–18 February 2018, no. 29 [lent by thepresent owner].

References
Von Moltke, Joachim Wolfgang. Govaert Flinck, 1615–1660. Amsterdam, 1965, 97, no. 147, plate 30.
Kettering, Alison McNeil. “Rembrandt’s Flute Player: A Unique Treatment of a Pastoral.” Simiolus 9,
no. 1 (1977): 41–42, no. 24.
Sumowski, Werner. Gemälde der Rembrandt-Schüler in vier Bänden. 6 vols. Landau and Pfalz, 1983–94,
2: 1025, no. 635.
Schatborn, Peter, and Leonore van Sloten. Old Drawings, New Names: Rembrandt and His
Contemporaries. Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Rembrandt House Museum. Amsterdam, 2014, 79, fig. 21b.
Van der Molen, Tom, and Valentina Vlasic. Govert Flinck—Reflecting History. Exh. cat. Kleve, Museum
Kurhaus Kleve. Kleve, 2015, 127, 137, no. 21.
Sluijter, Eric Jan. “Out of Rembrandt’s Shadow: Govert Flinck and Ferdinand Bol as History Painters.”
In Ferdinand Bol and Govert Flinck—Rembrandt’s Master Pupils. Edited by Norbert Middelkoop andDavid DeWitt, 110, fig. no. 132, 228, cat no. 29. Exh. cat. Amsterdam, Amsterdam Museum;
Amsterdam, Museum Het Rembrandthuis. Zwolle, 2017.
Blanc, Jan. “Being Modern, Being Dutch: The Seventeenth-Century Invention of the Golden Age.” In
Rembrandt, Vermeer and the Dutch Golden Age. Masterpieces from The Leiden Collection and the Muséedu Louvre. Edited by Blaise Ducos and Lara Yeager-Crasselt, 38. Exh. cat. Abu Dhabi, Louvre Abu
Dhabi. London, 2019. [Exhibition catalogue also published in French and Arabic.]

Versions
Prints
1. Abraham Blooteling (1634–90), after Govaert Flinck, A Couple of Young Shepherds, ca. 1655–90,
etching and engraving, 283 x 355 mm.

2. John Smith (ca. 1652–ca. 1742), after Govaert Flinck, Shepherd and Shepherdess with a Garland, ca.
1683–1729, 167 x 210 mm.

Technical Summary© 2024 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Elegant Shepherdess Listening to a Shepherd Playing the Recorderin an Arcadian Landscape
Page 10 of 10

The painting was executed on a plain, open-weave canvas of medium weight. The canvas had been lined
previously with a wax adhesive. This lining was removed and replaced with a glue-paste lining in 2016. At
some point in the painting’s history, the tacking margins had been opened up and incorporated into the
picture plane, expanding the size of the painting slightly. During the relining in 2016, the tacking margins on
the top and sides were folded back over the stretcher, and along the bottom approximately half of the tacking
margin was folded over the stretcher. Therefore the painting is now close to its original dimensions, but
remains slightly expanded along the bottom edge.
The fabric support was prepared with a dark reddish-brown ground. Infrared photographs show a fairly
detailed underdrawing executed in liquid medium for the shepherd, but not for the shepherdess. Flinck left
the underdrawing exposed in some areas, for example in the drapery. The infrared photograph also reveals
several small artist’s changes, the most significant being an adjustment to lower the shepherdess’s garment on
her proper right shoulder and breast.
The paint was applied thinly and has become more translucent with time. Flinck left the warm groundexposed, or covered it with translucent glazes in some areas, such as the blue drapery and the landscape in theupper-left quadrant. Impasto is limited to highlights in the foreground landscape, flowers, and flesh.
The painting is in good condition. There is a vertical tear in the upper-left quadrant above the sheep and an Lshaped tear to the right of the shepherd’s head. There are also two diagonal linear paint losses in the vessel inthe right foreground, and other small, scattered losses throughout the composition. The paint has sufferedsome abrasion as well. The painting was treated in 2014 to resaturate the varnish and inpaint losses, and again
in 2016 to remove the lining and replace it with a more suitable one, as well as to remove and replace thevarnish and inpainting.

This summary is based on an examination report by Simon Howell and Rachel Carey-Thomas dated December
4, 2012; a treatment report by Kirsten Younger dated January 8, 2014; notes from Timothy John Watson on
treatment dated December 6, 2016, and December 20, 2016; and undated technical notes by Annette Rupprecht.

© 2024 The Leiden Collection