Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de JonghHISTORICAL SW&S PORTRAITSGLOBAL LEADERS FOR SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION:
THE IASSW PRESIDENTS 1928-2008

Jan Floris de Jongh (Netherlands), President 1954-19611
Albert Riga, CESRT, Zuyd University Maastricht
Jan Floris de Jongh played an undoubtedly significant role in thedevelopment of social work within and beyond The Netherlands.
Yet, he and his contributions to the field are barely known,
particularly in The Netherlands. His achievements warrant much
more attention given that this Dutchman was also one of the most
relevant figures in the international social work community.
According to data in the Amsterdam Municipal Archives, Jan
Floris de Jongh was born on April 7, 1910 in Buitenzorg in theformer Dutch East Indies (now Bogor, Indonesia).

Detail from a picture in
Neij / Hueting (1989)

The archives state that he was a registered lawyer in Amsterdam in 1933 and moved to The
Hague to pursue a career as a civil servant in the Ministry of Economic Affairs in 1934. In thesame year, he married Nel ter Weele. During his career at the Ministry (1934-1946) hewitnessed considerable changes which influenced his views of society namely, the Great
Depression and the German Occupation of The Netherlands in World War II.
Academic and professional activities
Apart from his activities at the Ministry of Economic Affairs, from which some letters, notes
and a bill have been left with his name (IISH Archives), he undertook research on the renewalof the Dutch political and socio-economic system. His first academic writings were on thissubject. His 1945 book on the renewal of the political system, largely written during the firstyears of World War II, emphasised the political discussion of the time to restore pre-war
principles and traditions rather than the uprooted modernism. That same year, his Ph.D. thesis
investigated the role of agencies in the (German occupied) Dutch socio-economic system andin particular, the pro-German lawyers in the National Office for Food Supply in War Timeand their collaboration with occupying German forces.
Shortly after the war, De Jongh became active in spreading ideas about the Dutch politicalsystem and the political responsibility of civil servants. He did so by participating and leading
conferences for socio-political movements like the Woodbrookers Workers’ Community, theDutch People’s Movement (which was the driving force behind the emergence of the renewed
Labour Party) and the Catholic resistance movement Christofoor.
Two of the central debates in the post-war era were the extent and acceptability of
governmental control in social life. De Jongh argued that only some generations before the1This article was first published 2007 in Social Work & Society, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 179-185.

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

149

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de Jonghtask of the state was practically restricted to defence, the police and judicial authorities,
foreign policy, law-making and taxes. With the exception of foreign policy, the main task ofthe state – in the Thorbecke era, founder of the Dutch Constitution – was to create laws andimplement the adopted rules of law.
The introduction of social legislation, however, created a complete set of regulations and a
new government apparatus, both of which have been continuously amplified and extended
ever since in areas like social insurance and social care, (e.g., poor relief, unemployment
benefits, health care, child welfare), housing programmes, new socio-economic agencies anddirectly after the war, despite much resistance, cultural policy. As a consequence, there wasan enormous increase in civil service employment (De Jongh et al. 1948).
More than ever, the WWII period raised questions about the role of the Civil Service and thetypes of responsibilities civil servants had in relation to political authorities. Although civil
servants were supposed to be politically impartial, adhering only to the policies of thegovernment department they worked for and controlled by elected Ministers, it was notcustomary to have civil servants purely follow the ideas of higher authorities.
Director of the School for Social Work in Amsterdam (1946-1964)
In 1946, De Jongh left the civil service to fill the post of Director of the School of Social
Work in Amsterdam, the world’s oldest school of social work. From the beginning, De Jonghpresented himself as an advocate of the renewal of social work education in the Netherlands.
He argued for the academisation of social work and actively promoted the integration ofsocial work education in the plans for a Political Science Faculty at the University of
Amsterdam. Together with Marie Kamphuis, another pioneer of Dutch social work, he argued
that similarly to the United States and the United Kingdom, social work education shouldhave a place in Dutch universities. Social work training should be provided at the generalbasic education level and at the university level. Social work students should be able tocontinue their studies at a university and pursue a doctoral degree.
This failed endeavour is said to have been a regret carried by Marie Kamphuis until the end ofher life. De Jongh and Kamphuis also shared the belief in the benefits of introducing
American case work in Dutch social work. Their approaches varied however in the way that
Kamphuis made an extensive description of social case work and introduced it into Dutch
social work while De Jongh emphasised the education of case workers.
In 1947, De Jongh was introduced to social case work through the work of the American,
Bertha Reynolds. Her book Learning and Teaching in the Practice of Social Work (1942) had
great influence on his work. He was particularly interested in a central principle of social casework referred to as Client Self-Determination. It is an old ideal from the early days of social
work that De Jongh (1950) wrote extensively about: the client's right to self-determination isthe beginning and the end of all thought and action of the social worker. He saw the social
worker’s task as only to help the client make own decisions. De Jongh published several
articles on social work, in general, and on American social case work, in particular. His
writings on case work concentrated on supervision, mentor-teachers and the importance ofgood student internships. He saw American social case work as truly democratic and believed
it to be an alternative for the patronising, mothering attitude that characterised Dutch social
work of the time. Ultimately, De Jongh believed social case work to be a basic method for allsocial work.

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

150

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de Jongh

President of the International Association of Schools of Social Work (1954-1961)
In 1954, De Jongh was elected president of the International Association of Schools of Social
Work (IASSW) and Katherine A. Kendall was elected secretary. In 1971 she became the
IASSW's first ever full-time secretary general, a position she held until her retirement in 1978.
During this whole period, both would put their stamp on the development of internationalsocial work. Over 34 years, from 1954 until the end of his life, the two exchanged many
letters (now preserved in the Social Welfare History Archives of the University of Minnesota)that paint a picture of not only a fruitful cooperation, but also of a growing and everlasting
friendship.
On February 16, 1954, Kendall wrote to De Jongh, who was hesitating to accept the proposed
appointment: “You are much, much too modest and I am glad we persuaded you to bepresident if only to make you aware of the very fine qualifications you hold for this job.“
These qualifications, such as his understanding of social work education in Europe and theUnited States and his actions in initiating progressive, forward-looking movements in social
work education in Holland, made him the best possible choice for the presidency according to
Kendall.
The name “International Association of Schools of Social Work” was given to the original
International Committee of Schools for Social Work set up in Berlin in 1929. The objective of
the Committee was “to bring about an exchange of opinion and experience between schoolsof social work and to deal with all problems of international co-operation of these schools,
such as the exchange of teachers and students, the organisation of a centre of documentationand information, the formation of international social study courses and the participation in
the preparation of international congresses for social work.” (IASSW 1929)
After World War II, the focus of the work of the IASSW was, alongside its reconsolidationand enhancing cooperation with the United Nations, to propagate methods of social work, inparticular case work, in Europe and more specifically in Germany, as a means ofdemocratisation.
De Jongh’s presidency of the IASSW marked the transformation of a European and NorthAmerican dominated International Committee of Schools of Social Work into a truly
international Association. This becomes evident in a letter he wrote to Katherine Kendall on
June 21, 1956 in which he states “We must indeed try to involve more people from other thanthe European and North-American areas.” It also is mentioned in a tribute (IASSW 1964)
given to him by Eileen Younghusband: “When he took office in the late 1940’s the
Association was still largely confined to Europe and it was thanks to the fruitful collaboration
between him and its able Honorary Secretary, Dr. Katherine Kendall, that in the succeeding
years it became truly a world-wide movement, affiliating schools of social work in increasing
numbers in every continent.”
Younghusband’s tribute (idem 1964) reveals more of the personality behind his
accomplishments: “Those of us who were fortunate enough to be members of the Executive
Board during Dr. De Jongh’s Presidency will never forget the gracious welcome he gave toevery individual Board member and how much he knew about social work developments ineach of their countries. Nor shall we forget the skill and clarity with which he led us throughoften intricate discussions, nor the delicious touches of sly humour which would often fall
like a beneficient shower of rain upon dry stretches of earnest talk. He saw clearly the
directions in which an international organisation like ours should move, and the schools ofSocial Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

151

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de Jonghsocial work all round the world owe him sincere gratitude for affording them the means ofinternational association which they need at this stage of their development.”
A similar description is given by Katherine Kendall in a personal e-mail message (March 22,2007) to the author of this article: “Greatly admired for his leadership, intelligence,scholarship, and breadth of knowledge of international affairs, he also was universally well
liked for his personal qualities. Although somewhat reserved by nature, he related warmly andeasily to all with whom he worked, no matter their station in life. My own connection withhim from the time he became President of the IASSW until his death is an example of hisability to form deep and lasting friendships. All who worked with him in that period hadmuch the same experience, based on his genuine interest in people, his understanding of
cultural differences, and a sense of humor that was a bit understated but always there at theright moment.”
In addition to his IASSW activities, De Jongh was, for a number of years, closely associatedwith the United Nations (UN), as the Dutch representative at the UN Social Commission, as
UN Advisor to Pakistan, as Director of various UN seminars and through the then Bureau ofSocial Affairs.
Director of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development in Geneva
In 1964, De Jongh became the first Director of the United Nations Research Institute forSocial Development (UNRISD) in Geneva. He was not involved in founding the institute, as
he stressed in a letter to Katherine Kendall on May 21, 1978: “Don’t call me the founding
director of UNRISD. Say: the first director if you want (…).” UNRISD was created as part of
the first UN Development Decade. The Decade emphasised a new approach to development,
in which purely economic indicators of progress were seen to provide only limited insight andmight conceal as much as they indicated (UNRISD Internet Site). The association betweensocial and economic interferences was a central theme in De Jongh’s work. In his
Directorship, De Jongh widened his scope of thinking along two main lines; one being therelationship between social work and social planning and the other being the transplant ofWestern Social Work to the Afro-Asian World. This is reflected in a letter (SWHA, March
23, 1965) stating that “In this Institute I have more than ever felt how difficult it still is todescribe exactly what the contribution of social work to a healthy society can and should be
and how much research is needed to specify and quantify this possible contribution, so thatsocial work can also get its share of the nation’s resources.”
In an article published in International Social Work (De Jongh 1965), he discussed thecontribution of social work research to social planning by asking whether the role of social
workers should be extended to policy making or social planning. At that time, the turbulent
sixties, it was difficult to answer this question in an unambiguous manner. De Jongh’s
straightforward answer was that schools of social work should not train in the area of social
policy.
As early as the 1950s, De Jongh (1953, p. 17) saw the problem of transplanting American
Social Work to European countries: “The transplanting of social work evolved out ofAmerican culture cannot be expected to work so effectively in other countries. While material
resources are undoubtedly important in the development of social work programmes, themore intangible cultural aspects should not and cannot be neglected. From experience inteaching casework in the Netherlands, it has been realized to a greater extent that thedifference in the cultural and scientific atmosphere in Europe and in the United States is a

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

152

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de Jonghmajor factor in preventing the importation of many American casework methods to Europe.”
In the 1960s, the discussion focus shifted to the problem of transplanting Western Social
Work to the so-called underdeveloped countries in the Afro-Asian World. In his article
entitled “Western Social Work and the Afro-Asian World” (De Jongh 1969), he argued thatsocial work had been imported to almost all the Afro-Asian countries from the West,especially from America and had not yet taken root in those countries. In fact, social work
cannot simply be transplanted to any other country, even if it is not at a great distance. In De
Jongh’s words (1969, p. 24): “I have never believed in the applicability of Dutch social work
to the Papuan highlands of New Guinea, but it did come as a surprise to me that Dutch social
work could not make any impact on our close Benelux neighbours in Brussels, nor they on us.
I have never quite believed in the French social worker’s efficacy in Timbuktu, but I havebegun to see that French social work concepts cannot take root even in Geneva, though the
Genevois in many ways is as French as French can be.”His last years
During De Jongh’s stay in Geneva, the situation of Dutch social work education had become
more urgent than in previous years. In his view, incompetence reigned in the government andsocial work had become the handmaid of the churches and, even worse, of religiousorganisations (SWHA, Letter May 20, 1962). He returned to the Netherlands in 1967 tobecome Director of the Centre for the Study of Education in Changing Societies, inAmsterdam. One of the achievements of this Centre was the production of a study entitled“Primary education in Sukumaland” for which De Jongh wrote a summarising chapter andwhich coincided with the publication of President Nyerere’s message on “Education on SelfReliance” (Nyerere 1967). His dissatisfaction with the Dutch situation continued in the late1960s, as he later remarked in a January 2, 1986 letter to Kendall, in which he stated that boththe social work field and international development work had become extremely popular in
the Netherlands with a great number of young intellectuals, mostly with strong ideologicaltendencies and an enormous ambition. This atmosphere was not very congenial to him anddespite his activities at the University of Amsterdam, he had neither the energy nor ambition,
to fight for any kind of personal position.
On a more personal level, De Jongh experienced some of his own challenges. His restless lifeof almost constant travel took a toll on his health, as he confessed in the same 1986 letter:“When I left Geneva in 1967 I was exhausted, completely, and I have never really regainedmuch of my old vitality – which by the way has always been limited due to my constitution.”
On September 15, 1982, his cherished wife, Nel ter Weele, passed away, “a truly beautiful
woman, inside and outside”, as Katherine Kendall described her in a letter of consolation to
De Jongh (SWHA, October 20, 1982). In De Jongh’s reply (SWHA, October 26, 1982) hedescribed the character of his relationship with Nel as follows: “It seems to me that, whateverpleasure I got from my work, whatever energy I put into it, the essence of all that was mainlyin the pleasure and satisfaction it gave to Nel, the joy of life she radiated. And so it is quite
true what you write: that we are central to each other’s life. And that also explains the feelingof senselessness, which now so often threatens to empower me, the feeling what sense can life
have now that she is no more there? Yes, there are my children and grandchildren and myfriends, male and female, and they are very warm, but……. How else could it be? I have met
her when I was 17, got engaged at 19 and married at 24, 48 years ago - a life time.”

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

153

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de JonghFinal word
Jan Floris de Jongh had a full and productive life, with the exception of his final years when
his physical condition forced him to live in solitude, as he wrote in his last preserved letter to
Kendall (SWHA, November 18, 1988). He was a distinguished leader who advanced thesocial work profession in the Netherlands and throughout the world in the mid-twentiethcentury. He made a significant contribution to advancing social work education, e.g., theacademisation of social work and the introduction of American case work in Europe. Under
his presidency, the IASSW moved from a mainly European and North-American membershipto a truly international organisation. He helped to lay solid foundations for the United
Nations’ social welfare activities and greatly contributed to social development research
particularly the emergence of social work in the Afro-Asian world.
References
De Jongh, J.F. 1945: De vernieuwing van ons staatkundig bestel. Arnhem.
De Jongh, J.F. 1946: De organen der sociaal-economische ordening. Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.
De Jongh, J.F. 1950: De ontwikkeling van het Amerikaanse casework, in: Tijdschrift voor Maatschappelijk
Werk, n.1, pp.1-3.
De Jongh, J.F. 1953: A European Experiment in Case Work Teaching, in: Social Case Work, January, p.17.
De Jongh, J.F. 1965: The Contribution of Social Work Research to Social Planning, in: International Social
Work, No. 3, pp.1-5.
De Jongh, J.F. 1969: Western Social Work and the Afro-Asian World, in: International Social Work, No.4,
pp.16-24.
De Jongh, J.F. et al. 1948: Ambtenaar en politiek. 's-Gravenhage.
De Jongh, J.F. et al. 1968-1969: Primary education in Sukumuland (Tanzania): summary report of a study madeby the Centre for the Study of Education in Changing Societies. The Hague.
IASSW 1929: Constitution of the International Committee of Schools for Social Work. June 1929.
IASSW 1964: Notes From the IASSW Secretariat, in: International Social Work, No.4, pp.22-28.
IISH Archives (International Institute of Social History): Archief J.F. de Jongh.
Marie Kamphuis Stichting, Hall of Fame: Dr. J.F. de Jongh, URL: www.mks.nl
Municipal Archives of Amsterdam: Dr. J.F. de Jongh.
Nyerere, J. 1967: Education for Self-Reliance, in: Policy booklet. Published in March 1967.
Neij, R. and Hueting, E. 1989: De opbouw van een sociaal-agogische beroepsopleiding 1899 – 1989. Zutphen:
De Walburg Pers.
SWHA (Social Welfare History Archives): IASSW Presidential Correspondence, 1954-1966; IASSW Tributes;
Katherine Kendall, Correspondence with Jan de Jongh. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
UNRISD (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development), URL: www.unrisd.org

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

154

Social Work & Society ▪▪▪ A. Riga: Jan Floris de Jongh

Author´s Address:
Albert Riga
Comparative European Social Research and Theory (CESRT)
Zuyd University
Brusselseweg 150
NL-6217 HB Maastricht
The Netherlands
Email: post@albertriga.com

Social Work & Society, Volume 6, Issue 1, 2008
ISSN 1613-8953 ▪▪▪ http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-11-14541

155