References

References
INTRODUCTION
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.

IDENTIFYING AND QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTIES
Cullen A.C., and Frey H.C. (1999). Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure and Risk Assessment: a Handbook for
Dealing with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs. Plenum Press, New York.
Eggleston H. S., Charles D., Jones B.M.R., Salway A.G., and Milne R. (1998). Treatment of uncertainties fornational greenhouse gas emissions. Report AEAT 2688-1 for DETR Global Atmosphere Division, AEA
Technology, Culham, UK.
Fishman G.S. (1996). Monte Carlo: concepts, algorithms, and applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Frey H.C., and Burmaster D.E. (1999). Method for characterization of variability and uncertainty: comparison ofbootstrap simulation and likelihood-based approaches. Risk Analysis, 19: pp. 109-129.
Frey H.C. and Rhodes D.S. (1996). Characterizing, simulating, and analyzing variability and uncertainty: anillustration of methods using an air toxics emissions example. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2: pp.
762-797.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1997). Houghton J.T., Meira Filho L.G., Lim B., TreantonK., Mamaty I., Bonduki Y., Griggs D.J. and Callander B.A. (Eds). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Inventories. IPCC/OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.
Lehtonen A., Mäkipää R., Heikkinen J., Sievänen R., and Liski J. (2004). Biomass expansion factors (BEF) for
Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forest. Forest Ecology andManagement. 188: 211-224
Morgan M.G., and Henrion M. (1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk
and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ogle S.M., Eve M.D., Breidt F.J., and Paustian K. (2003). Uncertainty in estimating land use and management
impacts on soil organic carbon storage for U.S. agroecosystems between 1982 and 1997. Global Change
Biology 9: pp.1521-1542
Oreskes N., Shrader-Frechette K. and Belitz K. (1994). Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical
Models in the Earth Sciences. Science, 263: pp.641-646.
Rypdal K., and Winiwarter W. (2001). Uncertainties in GHG emission inventories. Environmental Policy and
Science, 4(2-3): pp. 107-116.
Winiwarter W., and Rypdal K. (2000). Uncertainties in the Austrian GHG emission inventory. Atmospheric
Environment 35/32: pp. 5425-5440.

SAMPLING
Cochran W.G. (1977). Sampling techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Dees M., Koch B., and Pelz D.R. (1998). Integrating satellite based forest mapping with Landsat TM in aconcept of a large scale forest information system. PFG, 4/1998: pp.209-220.
De Vries P.G. (1986). Sampling theory for forest inventory. Springer-Verlag, New York.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

5.77

Chapter 5: Cross-Cutting Issues

Gertner G., and Köhl M. (1992). An assessment of some nonsampling errors in a national survey using an error
budget. Forest Science 38(3): pp. 525-538.
Köhl M., Scott C.T., and Zingg A. (1995). Evaluation of Permanent Sample Surveys for Growth and Yield
Studies. Forest Ecology and Management, 71(3): pp. 187-194.
Lund G.H. (ed.). (1998). IUFRO Guidelines for designing multipurpose resource inventories. IUFRO World
Service Volume 8. International Union of Forest Research Organizations. Vienna, Austria.
Raj D. (1968). Sampling theory. McGraw- Hill.
Reed D.D., and Mroz G.D, (1997). Resource assessment in forested landscapes. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
p.386
Särndal C.-E., Swensson B., and Wretman J. (1992). Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, New York.
Schreuder H.T., Gregoire T.G., Wood G.B, (1993). Sampling Methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory, John
Wiley & Sons, New York.
Scott C.T., and Köhl M. (1994). Sampling with partial replacement and stratification, Forest Science 40(1): pp.
30-46
Thompson S.K. (1992). Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

METHODOLOGICAL CHOICE -IDENTIFICATION OF KEY CATEGORIES
Cullen A.C., and Frey H.C. (1999). Probabilistic Techniques in Exposure Assessment,. A Handbook for Dealing
with Variability and Uncertainty in Models and Inputs. ISBN 0-306-45957-4. Plenum Press. New York andLondon.
Flugsrud K., Irving W., and Rypdal K. (1999). Methodological Choice in Inventory Preparation. Suggestion for
Good Practice Guidance. Documents 1999/19. Statistics Norway.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1997). Houghton J.T., Meira Filho L.G., Lim B., TreantonK., Mamaty I., Bonduki Y., Griggs D.J. and Callander B.A. (Eds). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Inventories. IPCC/OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.
Morgan M.G., and Henrion M. (1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk
and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Rypdal K., and Flugsrud K. (2001). Sensititivity Analysis as a Tool for Systematic Reductions in GHG
Inventory Uncertainties. Environmental Policy and Science. Vol 4 (2-3): pp. 117-135.

QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROLIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1997). Houghton J.T., Meira Filho L.G., Lim B., TreantonK., Mamaty I., Bonduki Y., Griggs D.J. and Callander B.A. (Eds). Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Inventories. IPCC/OECD/IEA, Paris, France.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.

TIME SERIES CONSISTENCY AND RECALCULATIONSIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.

5.78

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

References

VERIFICATION
Achard F., Eva H.D., Stibig H.J., Mayaux P., Gallego J., Richards T., and Malingreau J.-P. (2002).
Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297: pp. 999-1002.
Alexandrov G.A., Oikawa T., and Yamagata Y, (2002b). The scheme for globalization of a process-based model
explaining gradations in terrestrial NPP and its application, Ecological Modelling, 148: pp.293-306.
Aubinet M., Grelle A., Ibrom A., Rannik U., Moncrieff J., Foken T., Kowalski A.S., Martin P.H,, Berbigier P.,
Bernhofer C., Clement R., Elbers J., Granier A., Grünwald T., Morgenstern K., Pilegaard K., Rebmann C.,
Snijders C.W., Valentini R., and Vesala T. (2000). Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange offorests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Advances in Ecological Research 30: pp. 113-175.
Baldocchi D., Falge E., Gu L., Olson R., Hollinger D., Running S., Anthoni P., Bernhofer C., Davis K., Evans R.,
Fuentes J., Goldstein A., Katul G., Law B., Lee X., Malhi Y., Meyers T., Munger W., Oechel W., Paw T.,
Pilegaard K., Schmid H.P., Valentini R., Verma S., Vesala T., Wilson K., and Wofsy S. (2001). FLUXNET:A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water
Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities. Bull. Amer. Met. Soc. 82 (11): pp. 2415-2434.
Bakwin P., Tans P., Ussler W. III, and Quesnell E. (1995). Measurements of carbon dioxide on a very tall tower.
Tellus 47B: pp. 535–549.
Birdsey R.A. (1996). Carbon storage for major forest types and regions in the conterminous United States. In:
Sampson R.N., and Hair D.(eds.) Forests and Global Change, Vol. 2: Forest Management Opportunities for
Mitigating Carbon Emission American Forests, Washington D.C., USA, pp. 1-25.
Blair J.B., Rabine D.L., and Hofton M.A. (1999). The Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor: a medium-altitude,
digitization only, airborne laser altimeter for mapping vegetation. ISPRS J. Photogrammetric & Remote
Sensing 54: pp.115-122.
Butterbach-Bahl K., Breuer L., Gasche R., Willibald G., and Papen H. (2002). Exchange of trace gases between
soils and the atmosphere in Scots pine forest ecosystems of the northeastern German lowlands 1. Fluxes of
N2O, NO/NO2 and CH4 at forest sites with different N-deposition., Forest Ecology and Management 167: pp.
123-134.
Butterbach-Bahl K. and Papen H. (2002). Four years continuous record of CH4-exchange between theatmosphere and untreated and limed soil of a N-saturated spruce and forest ecosystem in Germany., Plant
and Soil 240: pp.77-90.
Carlson T.N. and Ripley D.A. (1997). On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf areaindex. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62: pp.241–252.
Chen W., Chen J.M., Liu J., and Cihlar J. (2000a). Approaches for reducing uncertainties in regional forest
carbon balance. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 14(3): pp. 827-838.
Chen W., Chen J.M., and Cihlar J. (2000b). An integrated terrestrial carbon-budget model based on changes in
disturbance, climate, and atmospheric chemistry. Ecol. Modelling 135: 55-79.
Chen, J.M., Pavlic G., Brown L., Cihlar J., Leblanc S.G., White H.P., Hall R.J., Peddle D., King D.J., Trofymow
J.A., Swift E., Van der Sanden J., and Pellikka P. (2002). Validation of Canada-wide leaf area index maps
using ground measurements and high and moderate resolution satellite imagery. Remote Sensing ofEnvironment, 80: pp. 165-184.
Dubayah R.O., and Drake J.B. (2000). Lidar remote sensing for forestry. J. Forestry 98: pp. 44–46.
Foody C.M., Green R.M., Lucas R.M., Curran P.J., Honzak M., and Do Amaral I. (1997). Observations on therelationship between SIR-C radar backscatter and the biomass of regenerating tropical forests. Int. J. Remote
Sens. 18: pp. 687–694.
Gemmell F. and McDonald A.J. (2000). View zenith angle effects on the forest information content of three
spectral indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 72: pp. 139–158.
Gholz H.L. (1982). Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area and biomass invegetation zones of the Pacific Northwest. Ecology 63: pp. 469–481.
Gobron N., Pinty B., Verstraete M.M., and Widlowski J.-L. (2000). Advanced vegetation indices optimised for
up-coming sensors: design, performance, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote
Sensing, 38: pp.2489–2505.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

5.79

Chapter 5: Cross-Cutting Issues

Gurney K.R., Law R.M., Scott Denning A., Rayner P.J., Baker D., Bousquet P., Bruhwilerk L., Chen Yu-Han,
Ciais P., Fan S., Fung I.Y., Gloor M., Heimann M., Higuchi K., John J., Maki T., Maksyutov S., Masariek
K., Peylin P., Prather M., Pakk B.C., Randerson J., Sarmiento J., Taguchi S., Takahashi T., Yuen C.-W.
(2002). Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models.
Nature, 415: pp. 626-630.
Huete A.R., Liu H.Q., Batchily K., and van Leeuwen W. (1997). A comparison of vegetation indices over a
global set of TM images for EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 59: pp. 440–451.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2000). Penman J., Kruger D., Galbally I., Hiraishi T.,
Nyenzi B., Emmanuel S., Buendia L., Hoppaus R., Martinsen T., Meijer J., Miwa K., and Tanabe K. (Eds).
Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
IPCC/OECD/IEA/IGES, Hayama, Japan.
Janssens I.A., Lankreijer H., Matteucci G., Kowalski A.S., Buchmann N., Epron D., Pilegaard K., Kutsch W.,
Longdoz B., Grünwald T., Montagnani L., Dore S., Rebmann C., Moors E.J., Grelle A., Rannik Ü.,Morgenstern K., Oltchev S., Clement R., Guðmundsson J., Minerbi S., Berbigier P., Ibrom A., Moncrieff J.,
Aubinet M., Bernhofer C., Jensen N.O., Vesala T., Granier A., Schulze E.-D., Lindroth A., Dolman A.J.,
Jarvis P.G., Ceulemans R., Valentini R. (2001). Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil
and ecosystem respiration across European forests, Global Change Biology, 7: pp. 269-278.
Kaufman Y.J. and Tanré D. (1992). Atmospherically-resistant vegetation index (ARVI) for EOS-MODIS. IEEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 30: pp. 261–270.
Kauppi P.E., Mielikäinen K., Kuusela K. (1992). Biomass and carbon budget of European forests, 1971 to 1990.
Science, 256: pp. 70-74.
Körner C. (2003). Slow in, rapid out – Carbon flux studies and Kyoto targets. Science, 300: pp.1242-1243.
Kramer K., Leinonen I., Bartelink H.H., Berbigier P., Borghetti M., Bernhofer C., Cienciala E., Dolman A.J.,
Froer O., Gracia C.A., Granier A., Grünwald T., Hari P., Jans W., Kellomäki S., Loustau D., Magnani F.,
Markkanen T., Matteucci G., Mohren G.M.J, Moors E., Nissinen A., Peltola H., Sabaté S., Sanchez A.,
Sontag M., Valentini R., Vesala T. (2002). Evaluation of 6 process-based forest growth models based on
eddy-covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at 6 forest sites in Europe. Global Change Biology, 8:
pp. 213-230.
Kurz W., Apps M. (1999). A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector.
Ecological Applications 9(2): pp.526-547.
Landsberg J.J. and Waring R.H. (1997). A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts ofradiation-use efficiency, carbon balance, and partitioning. Forest Ecology and Management, 95: pp. 209–228.
Luckman A., Baker J., Honzák M., and Lucas R. (1998). Tropical forest biomass density estimation using JERS1 SAR: Seasonal variation, confidence limits, and application to image mosaics. Remote Sens. Environ, 63:
pp. 126–139.
McGuire A.D., Sitch S., Clein J.S., Dargaville R., Esser G., Foley J., Heimann M., Joos F., Kaplan J.,
Kicklighter D.W., Meier R.A., Melillo J.M., Moore B. III, Prentice I.C., Ramankutty N., Reichenau T.,
Schloss A., Tian H., Williams L.J., and Wittenberg U. (2001). Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in
the twentieth century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land-use effects with four process-based ecosystemmodels. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 15: pp.183-206.
Means J.E., Acker S.A., Harding D.J., Blair J.B., Lefsky M.A., Cohen W.B., Harmon M.E., and Mckee W.A.
(1999). Use of large-footprint scanning airborne lidar to estimate forest stand characteristics in the Western
Cascades of Oregon. Remote Sens. Environ., 67: pp. 298–308.
Mollicone D., Matteucci G., Koble R., Masci A., Chiesi M., Smits P.C. (2003). A model based approach for theestimation of carbon sink in European forest. In: Valentini R. (ed.) Fluxes of carbon, water and energy ofEuropean forests. Ecological Studies, Vol. 163, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp.179-206.
Monteith J.L. (1977). Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London, Series B, 281: pp.277–294.
Moreau L. and Li Z. (1996). A new approach for remote sensing of canopy absorbed photosynthetically active
radiation. II.: proportion of canopy absorption. Remote Sensing of Environment, 55: pp.192–204.
Nabuurs G.J., Pavinen R., Sikkema R., Mohren G.M.J. (1997). The role of European forests in the global carbon
cycle – a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13: pp. 345-358.

5.80

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

References

Nilsson S., Jonas M., Obersteiner M., Victor D.G. (2001). Verification: the gorilla in the struggle to slow global
warming. The Forestry Chronicle 77(3): pp.475-478.
Okuda T. and Nakane K. (1988). Application of Landsat MSS data to the vegetation classification—a case studyof the northwestern part of Fukuoka prefecture, Japan. Jpn. J. Ecol. 38: pp. 85–97.
Okuda T., Suzuki M., Adachi N., Yoshida K., Niiyama K., Nur Supardi M.N., Manokaran N., Mazlan H. (2003).
Logging history and its impact on forest structure and species composition in the Pasoh Forest Reserve Implication for the sustainable management of natural resources and landscapes. In Okuda T, Niiyama K.,
Thomas S.C., and Ashton P.S. (eds.). Pasoh: Ecology of a Rainforest in South East Asia, Springer, Tokyo, pp.
15-34.
Oreskes N., Shrader-Frechette K. and Belitz K.(1994). Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical
Models in the Earth Sciences.. Science, 263: pp. 641-646.
Page S.E., Siegert F., Rieley J.O., Boehm H.-D.V., Jaya A. and Limin S. (2002). The amount of carbon released
from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997. Nature, 420: pp.61-65.
Rauste Y., Häme T., Pulliainen J., Heiska K., Hallikainen M. (1994). Radar-based forest biomass estimation. Int.
Jour. Remote Sensing 15(14): pp. 2797-2808.
Running S.W. (1994). Testing FOREST-BGC ecosystem process simulations across a climatic gradient inOregon, Ecol. Appl. 4(2): pp. 238–247.
Running S.W. and Coughlan J.C. (1988). A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional
applications I. Hydrological balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes Ecol. Model. 42:
pp.125–154.
Running S.W. and Hunt E.R. Jr. (1993). Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes,
BIOME-BGC, and an application for global-scale models. In: Ehleringer J.R. and Field C. (eds.), Scaling
physiological processes: Leaf to globe, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 141–158.
Saatchi S.S., Nelson B., Podest E., and Holt J. (2000). Mapping land cover types in the Amazon Basin using 1
km JERS-1 mosaic. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21: pp. 1201–1234.
Schulze E.-D., Valentini R., Sanz M.-J.(2002). The long way from Kyoto to Marrakesh: implication of the
Kyoto Protocol negotiations for global ecology. Global Change Biology 8: pp. 505-518.
Smith P. (2001). Verifying sinks under the Kyoto Protocol. VERTIC Briefing Paper 01/03, 1-9(http://www.vertic.org/briefing/briefing.html)
Steinkamp R., Butterbach-Bahl K., Papen H. (2001). Methane oxidation by soils of an N limited and N fertilized
spruce forest in the Black Forest, Germany. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 33: pp. 145-153.
Terhikki Manninen A., Ulander L.M.H. (2001). Forestry parameter retrieval from texture in CARABAS VHFBand SAR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 39(12): pp. 2622-2633.
Trotter C.M., Dymond J.R., and Goulding C.J. (1997). Estimation of timber volume in a coniferous plantation
forest using Landsat TM.. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18: pp. 2209–2223.
Uchijima Z. and Seino H. (1985). Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetation. (1)Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity, J. Agr. Met. 40: pp. 343–352.
Waring R.H. (1983). Estimating forest growth and efficiency in relation to canopy leaf areaAdv. Ecol. Res. 13:
pp. 327-354.
Waring R.H. and Running S.W. (1998). Forest Ecosystems. Analysis at multiple scales. Academic Press, San
Diego, CA, USA.

IPCC Good Practice Guidance for LULUCF

5.81