Todai Finance Innovation Program Lecture 6 Report

The sixth lecture of the Todai Finance Innovation Program was held on the 4th of July at
the Kojima Conference Hall at The University of Tokyo Hongo Campus. The lecture took on acompletely new dimension to previous lectures in the form of financial regulation, with discussions
held on its current role in the financial system in addition to insight into its possible roles in thefinancial system of the near future. We were privileged to have Mr. Naohiko Matsuo from
Nishimura & Asahi, who also previously worked as Director for the Financial Instruments andExchange Act of the Financial Services Agency, share his ideas and expertise on the topic. The
lecture covered a broad range of topics, from core principles such as the aims of financial regulation
to current agendas such as the regulation of new trends such as FinTech. This lecture reportsummarizes the main points of discussion raised by Mr. Matsuo during his lecture.

Objective of Financial Regulation
The mission of the Financial Services Agency in Japan (JFSA) is outlined as follows:i)

Securing financial stability in Japanii)

Protection of savings holders, insurance contract holders, securities investors among others.

iii)

Facilitate financial smoothness(Translation Lecture slide 3)

In recent years the FSA has set annual Strategic Directions and Priorities, which outline
missions and priorities for the specified period. The latest release has outlined the JFSA’s mission to“contribute to the national welfare by securing sustainable growth of national economy and wealththrough achieving the following three sets of goals:i.

Financial stability and effective financial intermediation;ii.

Consumer protection and consumer benefit; andiii.

Market integrity and market vigor.”(Taken from Strategic Directions and Priorities 2016-2017 released by the Financial Services Agency in Japan)

In such way, Professor Matsuo noted that the although the objective of the Financial
Services Agency has remained unchanged over time, the priorities and goals set are constantly being
reviewed and updated to match the current needs of society. As the nature of the financial systemchanges as can be seen recently with the emergence of FinTech, it is only logical for financial
regulations to adapt also.

Inspection and Supervisory Departments
Two important bureaus of the JFSA are the Bureaus of Inspection and Supervision. There
has been much discussion concerning the need for finding an ideal balance between the independentand integrated operation of the respective burueas. However, in recent years there has been a movetowards the bureaus working together in close cooperation as outlined in the Highlights of theFinancial Monitory Policy for 2014-2015. This was done with the aim of achieving better
integration of on-site and off-site monitoring processes; hence the mode of thinking at present leans
towards inspection being a tool at the disposal of those in charge of supervision to aid in theirmonitoring of financial business operators.

Fiduciary Duty
The principles of Fiduciary Duty are a set of basic principles that financial business
operators are recommended to adopt in connection with the operation of their client-orientedservices. Therefore, similar to the Stewardship Code implemented a few years ago, there is no
explicit obligation for financial business operators to adopt or comply with the principles ofFiduciary duty. However, if a financial business operator chooses not to adopt or comply with aspecific principle, it is expected to provide valid justification and reasoning for its decision.
Furthermore, the financial business operator may be asked about any alternative measures it is
implementing in place of the fiduciary principle not adopted. The current format of the “Principlesof Fiduciary Duty” consist of the seven major principles outline below:

1. Establishment and Announcement of the Policy concerning Fiduciary Duties;
2. Pursuing the Best Interest of the Clients;
3. Appropriate Management of Conflicts of Interest;
4. Clarification on Fees, etc.;
5. Provision of Important Information that is Easily Understandable to the Client;
6. Provision of Services Suitable for Each Client; and7. Establishing the Framework for Appropriately Motivating its Personnel to Comply with
Fiduciary Duties.
(Translation obtained from Deloitte. The Financial Services Agency of Japan Releases ITS Draft. Retrieved August 03, 2017, fromhttps://www2.deloitte.com/jp/en/pages/legal/articles/dt-legal-japan-regulatory-update-17february2017.html)

Mr. Matsuo placed particular emphasis on the difficulties surrounding the secondprinciple “Pursuing the best interests of the clients” for many asset management firms in Japan due
to the structural organization that exists in terms of affiliated companies or group companies. A
typical case would be when a distributor sells or recommends financial instruments to its clients thatare provided by an affiliated group company. This may not truly be in the best interests of the client.
Another typical example is a distributor promoting and selling financial instruments from which they
can receive the highest commissions from the provider, placing its own interests before those of its
clients.

Regulation of FinTech
Of particular interest was the discussion surrounding the current FinTech movement.
FinTech has brought about structural changes in the financial system through unbundling as
discussed in previous lectures, in addition to the introduction of cryptocurrencies, and structuralchanges in financial transactions through the introduction of new technologies such as blockchain.
Regulating such new trends is a difficult task where consideration must be given to promote
innovation of financial services, while at the same time sufficient caution must be taken to protect
the interests of participants. Mr. Matsuo hinted that the regulation of FinTech might follow a similar
path to that of Forex, where the initial lack of regulation results in increased incidences of fraudulent
practices, which consequently leads to the introduction of tighter regulations. For example, funds
that use bitcoin are currently outside the scope of regulation of the Financial Instruments andExchange Act, so such funds at present are essentially free to operate as they wish. However, as
more people look to utilize such loopholes for possible fraudulent purposes, it can be expected that

regulations will be established accordingly.

Finally, the new wave of technology that has been witnessed in new financial services
may also be used in their regulation. The lecture mentioned the possibility of RegTech (short for“regulatory technology”), which could allow for better monitoring by both the public and private
sector to create a sort of monitoring ecosystem. Furthermore, with the proposed development of aregulatory sandbox in Japan, there is further hope that regulators and financial service providers canwork closely together to provide the best regulatory solutions that meet the goals of both parties.