Dominicus van Tol(Bodegraven? ca. 1635 – 1676 Leiden)

How to cite
Bakker, Piet. “Dominicus van Tol” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K.
Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artists/dominicus-van-tol/ (archived June2020).
A PDF of every version of this biography is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive ismanaged by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrativeoccurs.

Dominicus van Tol’s parents were Simon van Tol (d. ca. 1660) and Catharina Vechters (ca. 1602–74). Whenand where Van Tol was born cannot be established with certainty. He is thought to have been born around
1635 in Bodegraven, where his father worked as a notary public between 1630, the year he married in Leiden,and 1643, when the family moved to Leiden.[1] Van Tol came from a long line of notaries, including his father,
grandfather and brother Roeland.
Van Tol’s mother, Catharina, was the daughter of glassmaker Vechter Vechtersz van Strijtvelt (d. 1604) andMarytgen Jansdr van Roosenburg (1585–1651). After her father died in 1604, her mother took a second
husband, the glassmaker Douwe Jansz de Vries van Arentsvelt (1584–1656), with whom she had two sons.
One of them was Gerrit Dou (1613–75), who was thus Van Tol’s uncle. Because of this connection, Dou isassumed to have been Van Tol’s teacher.[2] The close ties between Gerrit Dou and the Van Tol family
manifested themselves in other ways as well; by the mid-1650s Anthonia van Tol (d. ca. 1684), Van Tol’s
younger sister, lived in Gerrit Dou’s house. She was in charge of the housekeeping, which led Dou to nameher the sole heir of his considerable estate a year before his death.
Van Tol established himself as an independent painter relatively late in life, only becoming a member of
the Guild of Saint Luke in 1664.[3] It does not seem that he prospered as an artist in Leiden; he left the city in
1669.[4] The declining market for painting may have prompted him to seek his fortune elsewhere.[5] He choseUtrecht, the home of his aunt Machtelt van Tol, who was married to the well-to-do, influential Frederick vanBeeck, steward of the Carthusian Order, from whose network Van Tol may have hoped to benefit.[6] In 1670
he married Maria Pollion (d. 1679), a preacher’s daughter from Woudenbergh, near Utrecht.[7] Van Tol’s
tracks in Utrecht can be traced up to 1672, the Rampjaar, when the French army that had invaded the Dutch© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Dominicus van TolPage 2 of 5

Republic also occupied the town. Van Tol did not wait for the siege, but fled with his wife and (presumably) hisinfant son Simon Petrus (1672–1720) to Amsterdam.[8] Van Tol certainly lived in Amsterdam for some time; hisdaughter Johanna Catherina was born there in 1674.[9] Yet whether he resided there continuously until
1675—the year he returned to Leiden—is uncertain.[10] There are indications that he stayed in Leiden regularly
prior to 1675.[11]The family was definitely back in Leiden in 1675, when Van Tol registered again with the Guild of Saint Luke.
It is highly doubtful, however, that he fared better there this time. Nearly all of the archival documents relating
to him after he returned to Leiden point to great financial problems.[12] In 1676 his dire situation prompted him
to seek permission from the city council to sell beer from his house, de Blauwe Werelt, located on the Bierkay
along the Oude Vest opposite the Lakenhal. His request was granted on 6 February, but Van Tol died inDecember of that same year and was buried in the Pieterskerk on 26 December 1676. He left behind so many
debts his widow declared “that she forwent the estate and relinquished it for the sake of the creditors while her
aforementioned husband’s corpse was still . . . above the ground, and accordingly laid the keys on the coffin
and left wearing her everyday clothes.”[13] Shortly thereafter Maria Pollion moved to Westzaandam, where she
married Pieter Milius from Amsterdam in 1679.

- Piet Bakker, 2017

© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Dominicus van Tol
Page 3 of 5Endnotes

1. W.I.C. Rammelman Elsevier, “Dominicus van Tol, schilder te Leiden, geb. 1631, overl.
1676,” in Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis, ed. F.D.O. Obreen (Rotterdam1887), 5: 344. If Van Tol was born in Bodegraven, this would explain the absence of a birthcertificate, as baptismal registers were kept there only as of 1642. However, it should betaken into account that after marrying in 1630, his father seems to have first been a notary in
Woerden, and in 1633 he is mentioned twice in documents, both as secretary of Katwijk andsecretary of ‘t Sandt. Hence, the family did not live uninterruptedly in Bodegraven between
1630 and 1643.
2. This tutelage, however, is not documented. Although Van Tol’s training with Dou is notdiscussed here, it should be noted that Dominicus was related to another renowned Leiden
painter and glassmaker, Abraham Toorenvliet (ca. 1610-92), the father of the painter Jacob
Toorenvliet (1640–1719), see his biography in this catalogue. According to Arnold
Houbraken, Abraham was also a reputable drawing teacher, whose pupils included his son
Jacob, Frans van Mieris (1635–81), and Mathijs Naiveu (1647–1727); see the biography ofFrans van Mieris in this catalogue. In 1650 Abraham Toorenvliet married Geertrui de Somer(d. 1656), the widow of Jan Dou (1609– ca. 1647), Gerrit’s brother. And a sister of Geertrui,Catelijn de Somer (d. 1626), was married to glassmaker Vechter Vechtersz (1599–1657), an
uncle of Van Tol. See Regionaal Archief Leiden, Leiden Baptism, Wedding and BurialRegisters.
3. If Van Tol was indeed born around 1635, then he joined the guild at the rather late age oftwenty-nine. He could have worked as an assistant to another painter in the years prior toregistering with the guild. The most likely candidate would have been Van Tol’s uncle Gerrit
Dou, whose work he emulated. If he was born in 1640 or 1641, which is theoretically possible
given that his father moved to Leiden only in 1643, then the timing of his guild registration ismore consistent with the customary pattern.
4. According to Abraham Bredius Van Tol left Leiden in 1669. Perhaps Bredius noticed that VanTol did not pay his guild contribution that year, which is indeed the case. He was not alone,
however, for not a single other painter paid: the contributions were not collected in 1669 or1670; Hans Vollmer, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenen Künstler (Leipzig, 1939), vol. 33).
5. Piet Bakker, “Crisis? Welke crisis? Kanttekeningen bij de economische neergang van deschilderkunst in Leiden na 1660,” De Zeventiende Eeuw 27 (2011): 232–70.
6. A brother of Frederick was a member of the Utrecht town council in the 1660s and later
served as an alderman. Two of his sons were also on the town council in the years when
Dominicus van Tol resided in Utrecht; information kindly provided by Marten J. Bok.
© 2020 The Leiden Collection

Dominicus van Tol
Page 4 of 5

7. The couple drew up a marriage contract in Utrecht on 22 March 1670. Dominicus van Tol wasassisted by his widowed mother Catharina Vechters, among others, and his future wife Maria
Pollion was assisted by her father Petrus Pollion, preacher in Woudenbergh, and her mother
Johanna van Goor. See Het Utrechts Archief, Notarial Archives, Notary J. Duerkant, inv.
U070b001. The couple posted their banns in Leiden on 4 April and subsequently probably
married in Woudenbergh. The name “Pollion” does not occur in Leiden and none of her
relatives seem to have been residents there, so we may assume that the couple met andbecame acquainted in Utrecht in 1669.
8. The birth certificate of Simon Pieter (“Simon Petrus”) known to have been born in 1672, has
not yet been found either in Utrecht or in Amsterdam, and so his place of birth cannot beestablished, as is the case for Dominicus himself.
9. Stadsarchief Amsterdam, Doopboek 66/294 NZK.
10. In a Leiden deed of 16 September 1672, in which his sister Anthonia authorizes her uncle
Frederick van Beeck to hand over to Van Tol in Amsterdam 1,000 guilders from theinheritance of his grandparents Mathias van Tol and Anthonia Gerrits, the artist was said tobe “residerende in Amsterdam” (residing in Amsterdam). See Regionaal Archief Leiden,
Notarial Archives, Notary D. de Fries, inv. 1223, deed 93. Another Leiden document, dated 1
January 1675, regarding an outstanding debt to the brewer Jacob Heyns, states that thepainter was “woonactich” (living) in Amsterdam. However, as he signed this document
himself, he must have been in Leiden at that moment. See Regionaal Archief Leiden, NotarialArchives, Notary J. Gerstecoren, inv. 1150, deed 1.
11. Portrait of an officer of the Leiden civic guard, 1673 (Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam), for example,
shows an unknown militiaman posing before the gate of the Saint George Civic Guard
headquarters in Leiden. Two other individual civic guardsman portraits display the exact
same background and have virtually identical dimensions. One of the sitters has been
identified as Jacobus van den Bergh, who was captain of the civic guard in Leiden between
1667 and 1674l; Portrait of Captain Jacobus van den Bergh before the Doelenpoort in Leiden,1673 (Private Collection). There is also a fourth portrait of the same size and with the samegate in the background; the sitter, an officer, is shown in three-quarter view rather than fullface, as is the case in the other portraits (photograph at the Netherlands Institute for Art
History, RKD, The Hague). Together these pictures seem to constitute a group commission
granted in 1673 (or thereabouts) that may have included several more portraits of officers,which have been lost. If, in fact, there was a group commission, Van Tol would then havespent a protracted period of time in Leiden around 1673.
12. To give an example of his troubles, one can point to three loans: 600 guilders, Regionaal
Archief Leiden, Notarial Archives, Notary J. Gerstecoren, inv. 1150, deed 1, 1 January 1675;
800 guilders, Regional Archief Leiden, Notarial Archives, Notary J. Stam, inv. 1270, 11 July
1675; and 600 guilders, Regionaal Archief Leiden, Notarial Archives, Notary D. de Fries, inv.
© 2020 The Leiden CollectionPowered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Dominicus van Tol
Page 5 of 51227, deed 14, 23 January 1676, all of which he was unable to repay. Illustrative of thefinancial problems that seem to have dogged him throughout his career is the bill that Utrecht
grocer Michiel Baudart (d. 1703) sent him in 1675 “ter saecke van geleverde waren bij hem
comp[aran]t aende voornoemde Sr. Toll inden jare 1671 ende 1672 gelevert” (regarding
goods delivered by him, the party appearing here, to the aforementioned Mr. Tol in the years
1671 and 1672). See Het Utrechts Archief, Notarial Archives, Notary W. van Velpen, inv.
U072a006, deed 164. The thousand guilders he inherited from his grandparents in 1672 as
well as the thousand guilders that devolved to him from his uncle Gerrit Dou’s estate in 1675
were not sufficient to alleviate his financial worries; see note 10.
13. “Dat sij den boedel abandonneerde en daervan afstant dede ten behoeve van de Crediteuren
terwijl het lyck van haer voornoemde man alsnoch … boven aerde stont, leggende mitsdien desleutels op de kiste en uytgaende in hare dagelyxsen klederen.” Netherlands Institute for Art
History (RKD), The Hague, Abraham Bredius Archive referring to Regionaal Archief Leiden,
Stedelijk Archief II, Dingboek, 22 December 1676.

Literature
Elsevier, I.C. Rammelman. “Dominicus van Tol, schilder te Leiden, geb. 1631, overl. 1676.”
In Archief voor Nederlandsche kunstgeschiedenis. Edited by F.D.O. Obreen, 5: 343–46.
Rotterdam, 1887.
Sluijter, Eric Jan, Marlies Enklaar, and Paul Nieuwenhuizen, eds. Leidse Fijnschilders: VanGerrit Dou tot Frans van Mieris de Jonge, 1630–1760. Exh. cat. Leiden, Museum DeLakenhal. Zwolle, 1988, 234–38.

© 2020 The Leiden Collection