Taira et al.

Int Chin J Dent 2007; 7: 75-77.

A detachable silicon obturator fitted after bilateral maxillectomy:
A clinical report
Yohsuke Taira, DDS, PhD,a Souichi Yanamoto, DDS, PhD,b Goro Kawasaki, DDS, PhD,bShinichi Yamada, DDS, PhD,b and Mitsuru Atsuta, DDS, PhDaab

Division of Applied Prosthodontics, and Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
A patient underwent treatment for malignant melanoma which necessitated the excision of all his teeth, thealveolar bone, and the hard palate. Prosthodontic rehabilitation was required to recover the processes ofmastication, speaking and swallowing, as well as improving aesthetics. A silicon obturator was fabricated with asoft denture liner material, inserted into the maxillary defect, and an acrylic denture was mechanically connectedto the silicon obturator. After one year of service, the patient was functioning well with the obturator prosthesis,
and no accidental changes were observed. This clinical report suggests that a detachable silicon obturator couldbe an option in the recovery of postsurgical maxillary defect. (Int Chin J Dent 2007; 7: 75-77.)
Key Words: biomaterial, maxilla, obturator prosthesis, tumor.

Introduction
Surgical excision is the primary treatment choice for malignant tumors affecting the maxillae, and theresulting maxillary defect is commonly repaired with obturator prostheses.
speaking, swallowing and respiration, and thus restore the quality of life.

1-3

Obturators assist mastication,

As long as some natural teeth exist

or dental implants are applied, the retention of the obturator can be ensured through clasps and/orattachments.4-10 However, when surgical excision has extended to all the teeth, the alveolar bone, the hard palate,
and the paranasal sinus, it leads to difficulty in retaining the obturator prosthesis.3,4 In such cases, it is important
to use an obturator prosthesis of special quality. Conventional acrylic obturator prostheses inserted into theundercut of maxilla sometimes injure soft tissues causing pain. The present report describes an obturator
fabricated completely from silicon-based soft denture liner material supporting the acrylic denture.

Clinical Report
A 52-year-old man was referred to the University Hospital of Medicine and Dentistry with the main complaint
being hard palate swelling.

Based on the diagnosis of malignant melanoma on the maxilla, bilateralmaxillectomy, radiation and chemotherapy were selected as the course of treatment.

Fig. 1.

The maxilla of the patient one-year after
bilateral maxillectomy.

Fig. 2.

75

The working cast used in the present report.

Taira et al.

Int Chin J Dent 2007; 7: 75-77.

The excision extended to all the teeth, the alveolar bone, and the hard palate (Fig. 1). Six months later, thepatient was examined in the prosthodontic division of the hospital; he requested a recovery of oral functions,such as mastication, speaking, and swallowing. A prosthodontic rehabilitation using an obturator prosthesis wasplanned to repair the postsurgical defect and recover oral function.

34Fig. 3.
An obturator fabricated from a silicon-based soft
denture liner material, whose anterior andposterior (arrows) projections can be held inplace inside the maxillary defect.
Fig. 4.
The oral cavity of the patient with the obturator inplace. Undercuts (arrows) were formed on thebeam and the anterior side.
Fig. 5.
An acrylic denture mechanically retained on theobturator.

5The obturator prosthesis was fabricated according to the procedure described below.
1. A definitive impression of the maxillary defect was taken with an impression material (Exafine, GC Corp.,Tokyo, Japan) and a custom impression tray (Ostron II, GC Corp.). A wax pattern (Paraffin Wax, GC Corp.)
was formed on a working cast (New Plastone, GC Corp.) (Fig. 2) and flasked.
2. An auto-polymerizing silicon-based soft denture liner material (Sofreliner Tough Medium, Tokuyama Dental
Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was packed into the modified working cast (Fig. 2) to form a silicon obturator (Fig. 3).
3. An acrylic denture was fabricated and fitted to the maxillary defect with the silicon obturator (Figs. 4 and 5).
Following placement of the obturator prosthesis, observations were taken on the second week, the first month,
the third month, and at intervals of three months thereafter. The patient complained of neither dislocation norpain when wearing the obturator prosthesis. One year after the placement of the obturator prosthesis, the patient
was functioning well, the tissue also appeared healthy.

Discussion
Amongst a variety of factors which affect masticatory performance while using obturator prostheses, surgicalresection of the hard palate has been reported as one of the most important in determining masticatory
performance.1,3 When the maxillary defect extends to more than half of the hard palate, masticatory performance76

Taira et al.

Int Chin J Dent 2007; 7: 75-77.

with obturator prostheses appears to decline considerably.3 According to this criterion, it was anticipated that it
would be very difficult for the patient to be comfortable and gain in an aesthetic sense while using the obturator
prosthesis. Contrary to what was anticipated before the prosthodontic treatment though, the patient satisfactorily
recovered oral functions and enjoyed improved aesthetics.
On the other hand, surgical resection of the soft palate generally causes dysfunction of speech and swallowing,
as it impedes velopharyngeal closure.2 Fortunately, for this patient, the soft palate was intact. With the obturator
prosthesis, the patient could speak clearly and swallow food.
When planning prosthodontic management, we considered some treatment options such as distraction
osteogenesis, bone grafts, and osseointegrated implants.9

However, taking into account the possibility ofadditional surgical treatment and the undesirable effect of radiation, these treatment options were not selected.
Although the silicon-obturator was mechanically attached to the lower side of the maxilla, little support
against occlusal force was obtained. An acrylic denture was mechanically retained on the silicon obturator
without adhesives. No molar teeth were put in the acrylic denture, as no antagonistic molar existed in themandible, and this also contributed to lighten the prosthesis. Furthermore, when the silicon obturator became
damaged or dirty, it could be reproduced easily using the working cast (Fig. 2). This clinical report suggests thata detachable silicon obturator could therefore be a definitive or temporary option in recovery of postsurgicalmaxillary defect.

References
1. Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, et al. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck1996; 18: 323-34.
2. Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after
maxillectomy: a prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 139-44.
3. Ono T, Kohda H, Hori K, Nokubi T. Masticatory performance in postmaxillectomy patients with edentulous maxillae fitted withobturator prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 145-50.
4. Gay WD, King GE. Applying basic prosthodontic principles in the dentulous maxillectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43:433-5.
5. Parr GR, Gardner LK. Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 503-11.
6. Roumanas ED, Nishimura RD, Davis BK, Beumer J 3rd. Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary
obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 184-90.
7. Matsumura H, Kawasaki K. Magnetically connected removable sectional denture for a maxillary defect with severe undercut:a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 22-6.
8. Markt JC. An endosseous, implant-retained obturator for the rehabilitation of a recurrent central giant cell granuloma: aclinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 116-20.
9. Block MS, Baughman DG. Reconstruction of severe anterior maxillary defects using distraction osteogenesis, bone grafts,and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 291-7.
10. Oh W, Roumanas E. Dental implant-assisted prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with a bilateral maxillectomy defectsecondary to mucormycosis. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 88-95.

Correspondence to:
Dr. Yohsuke Taira
Division of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
Nagasaki University, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
Fax: +81-95-819-7689 E-mail: yohsuke@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Received September 22, 2007. Accepted November 9, 2007.
Copyright ©2007 by the International Chinese Journal of Dentistry.

77