The ScythianStudy notes on the historical Jesus
based on the works ofProfessor Badiny, Jós Ferenc,
and other esteemed scholars
Fehérlófő tankör(study group)2008

Az apostol (The apostle[Excerpt], in free translation from Hungarian)
The grape is a tiny fruit,
Yet, it needs a whole summer to ripen.
The Earth, too, is a fruit, a giant fruit,
And if the tiny grape needs one whole summer,
How many does this giant fruit need,
Until it is ripe? It could take,Thousands, perhaps millions of years,
But it will surely ripen one day,And then people will feast on it,
Till the end of time.
The grape is ripened by the rays of the sun,(But) until it is sweet, how many sun rays,
Must breathe upon it the warmth of their lives,
How many hundreds of thousands, millions of rays?...
The Earth, too, is ripened by rays, but
These are not rays of the sun, (but) rather
The souls of people.
Every generous soul is such a ray, but
Only the generous soul, and they are rare,
How can one expect, then
The Earth to ripen quickly?
I feel that I, too, am a ray,Helping the Earth to ripen.
The life of a ray is but a day,I know that by the time,
Of the great harvest,
I will have been long past my sunset,
And traces of my minuscule work,
Will be lost in the great undertaking,But the knowledge gives my life strength,
And peace in my (hour of) death,That I, too, am a ray.
Petőfi, Sándor, 1848

It is not necessary to believe:
it is only necessary to know

"But be on your guard; for they will deliver you
to the courts, and you will be flogged in the
synagogues, and you will stand before
governors and kings for My sake, as atestimony to them... When they arrest you andhand you over, do not worry beforehand about
what you are to say, but say whatever is given
you in that hour; for it is not you who speak,but it is the Holy Spirit" (Mark 13:9, 11)TABLE OF CONTENTS
A word from the authors

7

Definitions

10

Anthropological notes on two, distinct
societies

14

Caucasian Group

15

Semitic Group

21

The Great Builder

31

Searching for the truth

50

Introduction

65

Background68

Jesus' lineage

71"Christ" born in a cave, a stable, or ...?

85

Historical overview

91

Mary's lineage

101

Mary's faith117

The Scythians, the biblical “people of otherfaiths”

123

What happened to the apostles?

151

What happened to the apostles writings?

159

The Gospels of Nag-Hammadi

164

The New Testament as recorded history:
caveat lector (reader beware)!

174

The Sumerians' “religion”

191

The Holy Spirit

218

Bread of Life and Water of Life

226

Queen of Heaven230

Jesus' life and crucifixion

244

Moral, legal and political fallout

257

Shroud of "Turin" and Simon Magus

263

Matters of faith

280

Every man's calling305

Condensed time line of some major events inthe early history of the people of the Light311

A word from the authors
This material deals with religious beliefs. We
realize, the information presented here is not foreveryone and some might find it unpalatable. We do
not wish to offend anyone and, therefore, urge those
who feel uncomfortable reading it to stop.
We are students of an ancient culture founded on
knowledge and wisdom. We are neither priests nor
missionaries; we do not represent any organized
religion nor claim knowledge of “the truth;” and we
do not propagate dogma. Also, we neither solicit nor
accept donations. Those interested in furthering thiswork are encouraged to continue this research,
individually or in groups, and to freely share theirknowledge with others for the elevation of Mankind.
Events reported to have occurred during the 510th centuries referenced in this study take into
account
possiblechronologicalerrorsandmisrepresentations. We believe the errors, if any,stem from the simultaneous use of three different
points of reference: 323 BC (year of rebirth after thedeath of Alexander of Macedon), 45 BC (1st year of
the Julian calendar), and year 1 (presumed to be
Jesus’ year of birth, retroactively applied after the
5th century). It would certainly have been inWestern European interest, notably the Holy See
and the enforcer of its policies, the Holy Roman
7

Empire, to take advantage of these errors, insert
non-existent periods into history filled with fictitious
protagonists and events for political gain, and tohide historical events that are not only unfavorable
to the West, but would also expose such
chronological fraud. Chronological research to datereveals that the 44 years needed to slide thecalendar forward to Jesus’ presumed year of birthwere taken from Atilla’s reign (Tóth, Gyula citing
Magyar Krónikák), while 297 non-existent years
appear to have been added to the calendar, pushing
the years forward. Heribert Illig’s argument
supporting such “chronological fabrication” (614 –911), however, appears to be somewhat narrow andsimplistic. Nevertheless, his conclusions appear to
be at least plausible. To date, no physical evidenceof this period has been found: There are no remainsof settlements, no coins, no tools, no graves, as thematter of fact, no evidence of any kind of humanpresence that can be irrefutably linked to thisfictitious era. The 7-9th centuries exist only in“written history,” and all so-called “historical
documents” regarding these 297 years examined todate turned out to be retro-dated forgeries. Further,any so-called “evidence of the Dark Ages” arefragments, dissociations, discontinuance and events
known to have occurred before or after that era.
Pragmatic history, on the other hand, shows an
8unbroken natural progression of 6th century events
which seem to jump over these three centuries andseamlessly continue during the period purported tobe the 10th century. Further, Uwe Topper presents
convincing arguments that link Muhammad’s escapeto the First Council of Nicaea in 325, exactly 297
years before the propagated year, 622.
However, we reserve judgment on this – often
called - “Phantom time hypothesis.” Further, tosimultaneously argue chronological errors would
make this study extremely confusing. Therefore,
dates in this study are those generally referenced
elsewhere, except where the actual date issignificant, in which case both dates are shown(currently propagated dates shown in brackets).
We believe our translations of the various works
are substantially accurate, but please keep in mind,
we do not have accredited English translators
among us. Any outside help in this regard would bemuch appreciated and, if requested, gratefully
acknowledged.
Please disseminate this material to scholars todebate and expand to the benefit of all seekers of
Truth.
Fehérlófő tankör (study group)
2008

9Definitions
Bible: Merriam-Webster source this word from Latin
biblia, from Greek, plural of biblion, book,diminutive of byblos papyrus, book, from Byblos,
ancient Phoenician city. However, the word biblia
does not exist as the Greek plural of biblion. Further,
there is no such word as biblia in Latin either.
Chaldeans of Mesopotamia, on the other hand,
speak of “Bi-bi-li-a” in Sumerian cuneiform texts.
There are currently three translations for thiscompound word: "speech, or voice of the light, or
clarity;" "overseer, or advocate of wisdom;" and"speech of heavenly knowledge" (Badiny).
Greek: Classical Greece (6-4th c. BC). Pythagoras,
Socrates, Plato and Aristotle study under the Medemagi. The subjects of their studies are the wisdomof ancient Chaldean texts written on papyrus from
Byblos. Their studies become the literature(philosophy) the West later attributes to “Classical
Greece.” Herodotus (484-425 BC) writes his history
in narrative form based on these Sumerian texts andon his travels to the Mediterranean and the BlackSea to confirm his sources. Greeks did not exist as
an identifiable people before the 6th c. BC. Some
speculate, the Mycenaeans (1600-1100 BC) were
proto-Greeks.
10

Byblos: City and major seaport 30km north of
Beirut, believed to be the oldest continuously
inhabited city dating from 5000 BC. The name
Byblos is said to have been given by the Greeks tothe city known in the Bible as Gebal, in history as
Gubala, Gubla, and during the Crusades, as Gibelet.
Gebal, Gubla: Today, Jbail (Arabic). Gubla is listed
as one of Nib-Ur's (6th millennium BC, biblical
Nimrod) provinces. Its patron, Baal-at Gebal, isassociated with Isis and the Sumerians' Queen of
Heaven, Baal, Light, divinity symbolized by the sun.
After the Babylonian Hebrews conceive Judaism andtheir new god, Yahweh (6th c. BC), Baal, of Baal-at
Gebal becomes Judaism's and, later, also JudeoChristianity's demon.
Phoenician: Greek name for the inhabitants ofNorthern-Canaan (including Gubla) during 12-9th c.
BC. Homer (though a questionable source) says theirlanguage "was borrowed from ancient Egypt."
Canaanite: Nib-Ur's (Nimrod) uncle, Kus' brother,
Canaan settled in Canaan (6th millennium BC).
Evidence does not point to any significant
movements of peoples before the time of the socalled Phoenicians. The only peoples in regular11

contact with the Canaanites during that time were
their kindred: Hurrians, Szabirs, Medes, andEgyptians. (The Hebrews invade Canaan but arehalted south of Sidon.) The only people who could
have lived in and around Gubla during th 12-9th c.
BC was a mix of ancient Canaanites and Hurrians,
and Szabirs, Medes and, possibly, Egyptians.
Mede: non-Semitic people of the Zagros Mountains
and Northern Mesopotamia (2nd millennium BC)
and believed to be the ancestors of the Kürt (Kurds).
Assyrologist Parpola says they are the Kuti (biblicalgoiim) people. Herodotus (i.101) lists 6 Mede tribes,
one of which is the Magi.
Persian: Earliest mention of this word occurs as
Parusa (834 BC), a term generally applied to
Iranians. However, the area known only since 226
AD as Iran (Aryan) was inhabited by Hurrians and,later, during the time of so-called Persians, by theMedes, whom later Greeks called Medians, and theChaldeans. Therefore, Persian refers to a geographic
location or a political power, not a people.
Chaldean: Kaldeans, non-Semitic inhabitants of
Mesopotamia known as “the people of knowledge”
who later allied with their northern kin, the Medes,
to defeat the hegemony of the Babylonian Hebrews'
12Hammurabi-religion-ideology (18th c. BC). In 256
BC, they form the Parthian Empire along withother Scythians, the Medes, and other non-Semitic
peoples of Sumer.
Scythian: Szkíta; Often restrictive Greek name of
the indigenous peoples of Central Eurasia; also
known as Magyars, Huns, Avars, Celts, Jazig, Kürts(Kurds), Baktrians, Sarmatians—among others.
Sumerian: Subartu, Szabir, Sa-pir (sun-faced,facing the sun) people, Scythian, Magyar; Hun—
Wallice Budge, An Hieroglyphic Dictionary, citing
Egyptian records. Árpád's grandson cites the Greek
Chronicles where their original name is SzabirAszfali. Also their land, Sumer.
Magyar: a people and their language: also called
Maghar, Mahgar; Maghadi, Maghori by Indians;
Scythian by Greeks; Xia Hun by Chinese; Hun;
Hungarian; Székely (Seculi); “Avar;” Celt in Western
Europe; biblical Magog. Magyar-speaking people
centered in the Carpathian Basin since at least the
Early Neolithic (Krantz). They bring writing toSumer (3000 BC) as the Jemdet Nasr (name of digsite) People; and establish civilizations in Europe,
China, India, Egypt and the Americas (Maya).

13

Anthropological notes on two, distinct societies
The following are notes on two, distinct societies
to help understand:1. The tie between Judaism and JudeoChristianity and;2. Contradictions
between
Judeo-Christian
dogma; and Jesus' true identity, history andteachings.
Archaeological, linguistic and anthropologicalevidence of the “Sumerians,” Scythians, Chaldeans,
Medes, Magyars, Huns is publicly available.
Findings attesting to the "Sumerians'" religion are
sourced from published archaeological works.
Jewish and Judeo-Christian claims are sourced fromthe publications of institutions representing thoseideologies. Other material is sourced from various
public historical records.

14

Caucasian GroupScythians, Huns, Turanians, Medes, Chaldeans:
Magyars(biblical
Magog),
also
Szabir,“Sumerian.”• Origin: Magyar-speaking people live in the
Carpathian Basin since at least the Early
Neolithic1.
• Language: Agglutinative written languages:
Magyar (Hungarian)2, Etruscan, Turkish, Basque,Aramaic, various Caucasian languages andJapanese.
• Symbols: Sun, Rosetta3, Lion (Constellation of thesun), Turul (Falcon), Tree of Life, Tree ofKnowledge, Fokos (Ax), Holy Fire, Four Wedges,
Venus, Hun (Celtic) cross and the double cross.
• Principles: Knowledge, wisdom, quest for truth via
direct spiritual contact with God. Motto: “Upliftingknowledge is the greatest gift a man can have.”4.
• Leaders: Teachers and healers: Magi and Táltos
(Magyar-Hungarian). Also Gudea, Melchizedek, IZZU (Jesus). Political leaders: Kings and princes ofcity-states, kingdoms and empires (monarchies) of
Ut-Nap-Ishtim's nations. Kings are chosen from12
3
4

Grover S. Krantz; K & E Grandpierre, and others.
“Sumerian is closely related to Hungarian,” Archibald Sayce.
The chrysanthemum appears on the flank of the Lion of Esztergom(Hungary), the Imperial Seal of Japan, and on Shinto shrines.
A. Grandpierre, Ancient People of the Royal Magi: The Magyars: Selected
Studies in Hungarian History, 2008, p 351.

15

among the magi.
• Religion: Monotheist: An unimaginable Creatorand Source of Life called (among other names)
Isten, Trinity of Light and, depending on thereferenced divine activity or function, Father ofLight, (Virgin) Mother of Light and Child of Light isinferred from cosmic manifestations.
• Peoples: (Non-exhaustive list)• Magyars-Huns-Scythians• Black Huns5 (Europe): Prominent names:
Atilla, Árpád
• Celtic (Kelt)6 peoples (Central and Western
Europe) migrate west and bring civilization toWestern Europe.
• Irish, Welsh, Scots, Gauls, Basques,
Etruscans, Eravisci.
• Magyars, also called Hungarians, Huns andAvars;
theaboriginal,
Magyar-speaking
inhabitants of Central Europe, are one and thesame people, Hungarian being the English
variant. Historical accounts of the Magyars
vary. Below is a brief summary of their recent
history—thoughitsinterpretations
arefeverishly contested by Western historians:• The Romans conquer Western Hungary
5616Black and White refer to relative geographic location, Black being thedarkness of the North, e.g. Black Huns, Black Sea = Northern Huns,
Northern Sea.
Celt: Hungarian Kel: Rise; Kelt: Risen; Kelet: Sunrise, also East.

(Pannonia) in 14 AD but the Huns retain
autonomy. Under Atilla's leadership, they clash
with the Romans (Battle of Chalons) in 405(451). Both armies are decimated and the
Romans withdraw. Atilla pursues the Romans
and, in less than a year, catches the remnantsof Aetius' armies in Italy. Emperor Valentinian
III dispatches Pope Leo I to meet Atilla andplead for clemency which Atilla grants in
exchange for the return of Hun treasuresplundered by the Church. Missionaries of the
Roman Church destroy the Huns' religious
symbols. The Huns revolt and launch a seriesof punitive attacks against Rome.
• The Huns, reinforced by waves of Scythianrefugees from former Parthia, become known
as the “fort-builder Huns,” “Avar,” (from “a várépítő,” “vár” meaning fort). When they learn ofEmperor Heraclius' (Byzantine, by now JudeoChristian) desecration of the Holy Fire, symbolof the Scythians' Holy Spirit, they launch a
successful punitive attack led by Bajánfi
against Byzantine 5th (7th) century.
• East of the Carpathians, eight Magyar nations
under the leadership of Árpád, son of Álmos,
son of Emese (Parthian royal bloodline),further reinforce their kindred in the
Carpathian Basin in 549 (895). Their combined
17

armies launch military campaigns in Western
Europe to recover their nation's religious
treasures plundered by marauding Germanic
tribes, and to foil German plans to invade
Hungary.
• A conspiracy between foreign supporters of apretender to the Árpád house, Vajk, and theHoly Roman Empire results in the killing andquartering of Árpád's rightful heir, Koppány.
Vajk is installed as King Stephen I (1000 AD)
by Pope Sylvester II in exchange for Hungary's
forced conversion to Roman Christianity. The
Inquisition purges the Magyar magi and burns
their sacred writings attesting to Jesus' true
identity and teachings. Judeo-Christianity andan alien feudal system are forced on the
Magyars. Hungary becomes landlocked whena pre-World War I Russian-French Pan-Slavic
conspiracy to reduce Hungary's territory by
2/3 to create new Slavic states is implemented(Trianon Dictate of 1920) (These states havesince self-destructed).
• Jazig, Sarmatians, Medes, Hurrians, Baktrians;
usually considered Magyars.
• Black Huns absorbed into other cultures:• Kussanians, Armenians, Kürts, Kassitans,
Poles, Croats, Ukrainians.
• White Huns (Western and Central Asia, Northern
18India and some European Magyars):• Turk:• Turkish, Azeri, Uzbec, Kazah, Kirzig, Tatar,
Tadzik, Karapurak, Turkmen,• Uighur,• Nipponese (later in Japan),• Hunza,• Buda (Buddha), Kurusan (Krishna),• Mayans (in the Americas).
• Ut-Nap-Ishtim, (biblical Noah). Mount Nisir7,
Mesopotamia, Flood of 5500 BC8.
• Canaan,grandsonof
Ut-Nap-Ishtim;
Mesopotamia and, later, Canaan:• Canaanites, 6th m. BC, Jordan Valley region,
later called Adiabene (Parthia) and Palestine.
• Kus, (Cush), Hungarian for Ram (Aries),
grandson of Ut-Nap-Ishtim; Mesopotamia andEgypt:• Nib-Ur, (Panther-Lord) son of Kus, (biblical
Nimrud, Nimrod9); Mesopotamia, Scythia:• Price Nakeb Adiabene, Parthian prince.
Parthia
defeatsRome
andliberates
Northern Palestine (biblical Galilee, Samariaand parts of Judea). The newly liberated
territory is attached to the (Parthian)789

Epic of Gilgamesh (Nib-Ur, Nimrod) 3rd millennium BC.
Geologists William Ryan and Walter Pitmantime.
Nimrod is also the name of a star constellation later renamed "Orion" inWestern cultures.

19Adiabene Kingdom under his governorship.
• Princess
Mary
Adiabene
Kharax,daughter of Prince Nakeb Adiabene andParthian Princess Grapte-Kharax.; wife of
Useph Adiabene (biblical Useph Pandar)
under civil law.
• Gabriel,
Head-magus,
Sippar,Mesopotamia. He travels to Scythopolis,
Galilee, to visit Mary to announce her
miraculous pregnancy (legend only).
• Izzu, popular name of Jesus, son of Princess
Mary Adiabene Kharax, born in 6 BC in
Bitlahmi, Galilee (written Bethlehem using
the Roman alphabet).
• Magi travel from Sippar to greet Jesus(biblical Wise Men, [Kings] of the East).
• Jesus teaches neighborly love and quest
for Truth. He is crucified but resurrects.
His apostles teach in Parthia, Scythia,
Egypt and India, but avoid Rome.
• Parthia falls; Scythians migrate north tothe land of their brethren, Central
Eurasia.

20

Semitic Group
Semites, Hebrews, Jews. (The history and cultureof the Arabs and Islam is not addressed)• Origin: Unknown. Semitic tribes migrate from
Arabia (c. 2500 BC) and squat throughout
Mesopotamia.
• Locals call the Semite squatters Hebrew (fromhabiru: “they who murder with webs”).
• Hebrews migrate to Egypt (circa 14th c. BC) but
are evicted by the Egyptians (biblical Exodus).
• Hebrews ousted from Egypt invade Canaan but
are halted south of Sidon and pushed back tolater Judea.
• Hebrews are deported form all of Canaan to
Babylon, Mesopotamia (biblical Babylonian
Exile).
• Many Babylonian Hebrews (by now, known asJews) return to Southern Canaan (Judea) (537BC).
• Jews migrate to Europe and, later, to the UnitedStates, home of the world's largest Jewish
population.
• Language: Hebrew; Inflecting (synthetic,
fusional). Early Semites speak Hebrew. Later, they
begin to also write Hebrew by adopting theSumerians' Aramaic alphabet. By the 1st century,21Hebrew had been a dead language for centuries 10.
Judean Jews speak and write only Greek. Since the18th c., (a revived) Hebrew is spoken and also
written. Also Yiddish, a German-Hebrew mix.
• Symbols: The six-pronged star, the Sumerians'
religious diagram to depict the Dual Trinity ofLight, which 6th c. BC Babylonian Jews note and,during the Early Modern Period (16-18th c.),appropriate as their symbol, (variably) calling it
Magen David, Shield of David, Solomon's Seal.
Menorah, a multi-branched (7-9) candelabrum issaid to represent Abraham's “burning bush” or the
Torah (Jewish Law). Judeo-Christians appropriate
the Hun (also called Celtic) cross symbol to identify
themselves, and also carry the symbol of Judaism's
common sacrificial animal, the pigeon, into JudeoChristianity. The skullcap (kippa, yarmulka,
zuchetto) is worn by religious Jews and some
Judeo-Christian priests.
• Principles: Vary from one sect to another. Racial
supremacy and purity. The motto of the Mossad(Israeli Intelligence) is "By way of deception, thoushalt do war."• Leaders: Spiritual leaders vary with era and sect.
In Egypt, Ethiopia, Canaan and Babylon, their
spiritual leaders are also their political leaders. In
10 J.E. Conner PhD.: Christ was not a Jew, The Christian Book Club,
Hawthorne, Ca., 1972, Page 28.
22

Judea, they are the high-priests of the Temple ofJerusalem. Elsewhere, they are the Prince of the
Synagogue or Chief Rabbi. In Christianity, they are
the heads and senior officers (bishops) of thevarious Churches.
• Religion: Early Semites arriving in Mesopotamia
worship the Sumerians' Queen of Heaven (alsoknown as Baal, Morning Light, [Venus]). Their later
gods are Ea, Assur (Marduk), Bel; Elephantian Jews
offer sacrifices to at least 4 gods; Jahu, Asembetel,
Anatbetel and Herembetel.
• Babylonian Hebrews (6th c. BC) conceive areligious dictatorship, today's Judaism. They
select bits and pieces of their legends of theirprevious gods, merge them with Sumerian
historical accounts reworked to favor Hebrews,
declare themselves their new god's earthly
deputies and their race supreme (God's Chosen
People), and introduce their ideology as the
Hebrews' new mandatory religion, a religion
foundedonracism,deception,
hatred,vengeance, and animal and human sacrifices totheir new god, Yahweh. Religious dogma andrites, which include mutilation of male infants,
are laid down in their religious laws and austerecivil penal codes.
• The Sumerians' Queen of Heaven-BaalMorning Light becomes Judaism's arch23

demon;• Scythian-Chaldean-Mede-Magyar(Magor)patriarch Nimrod and all magi are declareddemons.
• Judean Jews live under the religious
dictatorship of the high-priests of the Temple ofJerusalem.
• The high-priests of the Temple of Jerusalem
accuse Jesus of being a magus (demon); andbribe the Roman Governor, Pilate, to turnJesus over to them. They torture and crucify
Jesus.
• The Jewish priest, Rabbi Saul, founds a new
Jewish sect for non-Jews, Roman Orthodoxy(later Judeo-Christianity). The new religion,
founded on fear of afterlife eternal torture,requires non-Jews to submit to the authority of
the Church of Rome, directed according to thedoctrines of Rabbi Saul.
• Judeo-Christianity:• Fabricates a new Semitic-Hebrew lineage
for Jesus and begins to propagate him asa Jew.
• Teaches hatred of the demonized (byJews) Queen of Heaven-Morning Light(Lucifer).
• Purges Jesus' followers and destroys theirwritings. Herod launches a manhunt for24

Peter.
• Declares Jesus' disciple Simon the
Canaanite, Pal (biblical Simon Magus) ademon.
• Rabbi Saul appropriates Simon the
Canaanite's Pal name, claims conversion
following a vision, passes himself off asJesus' Apostle, and spreads the new
Jewish sect throughout the Roman
Empire. Later, he becomes known as
Judeo-Christianity's Saint Paul.
• Rome collapses. Jews migrate to Europe (andelsewhere) where they execute the greatest fraud
in Europe's history using a forged document toform a political power subservient to Jewish
interests, the Holy Roman Empire. The crown of
the new empire symbolizes Jewish authority andsupremacy, the realization of the fictitious biblical
Jewish kingdoms of David, Solomon and Hezekiah.
Jews expand with the empire. Together with theSephardicJews
oustedfrom
Spain,
they
appropriate the Ashkenaz(im) name and spreadthroughout Europe.
• Roman Christianity (Inquisition) purges theleadership (magi) of the Jesus Faith throughout
Europe and destroys their writings. Europe isconverted to Judeo-Christianity by force.
• People(s): (Non-exhaustive list)25

• Hebrews, Jews. Most (but not all) Jewish sectsconsider descendants of a Jewish maternal
bloodline Jews.
• Other than religious and geographic
references, little is known of the early Semites
who migrate to Mesopotamia. According toJewish sources, they start referring tothemselves as Israel when they begin theirmigration to Egypt where they are also calledhabiru, Hebrew(s). Jewish historians claimthat after invading Canaan, the Hebrews from
Egypt carve up the conquered land among
themselves and name it Kingdom of the Twelve
Tribes of Israel. When they conceive their new
religion, Judaism, in Babylon (6th c. BC), they
become known as Jews, though the origin of
this name is much debated. No archaeologicalevidence has ever been unearthed to
substantiate exclusively Jewish religious
claims or identifiable sub-groups of theSemites who migrated to Mesopotamia and,later, to Egypt and Canaan. What information
is available cannot be reliably sourced. There
are no historical records of Hebrew or Jewish
evangelists or kings, and no graves, humanremains or any evidence of their existence.
• Abraham is claimed by Jewish historians tohave been an 18th c. BC Semite, a direct26

descendant of (biblical) Noah, who is orderedby his god to kill his son as a human sacrifice(it is claimed that he does not). Jews andMuslims claim he is their patriarch; the Roman
Catholic Church claims he is the Christians'
patriarch (as well) "in faith." Jews explain his
biblical 11 generation genealogy leading backto Noah by rejecting the geological date of thebiblical flood and by claiming multi-century
life spans. There is no evidence any Semitic
Abraham ever existed. There is reference to acertain Abram in Haran but he (and his wives)
lived much earlier and was a Caucasian
Hurrian, not a Semite.
• Jacob, claimed to have been Abraham's
grandson, is said to have been told by his god
to change his name to Is-ra-el before
migrating to Egypt (The word “Iz-ra-el” is theSumerian name of a Caucasian [Turanian]tribe). Following the appropriation of thistribe's name, Jews begin to use the name
Israel to refer to themselves11. There is noevidence Jacob existed, as claimed.
• Hammurabi, 18th c. BC king of Semitic
Babylon. He introduces the concept of landownership, religious prostitution, and the laws
and “righteousness” of cruelty and revenge,
11 The word “Israel” is never associated with Semites, Hebrews or Jews in
objective literature.

27

laws which later become basic tenets of
Judaism, known as the “eye-for-eye, tooth-fortooth” vengeance ideology.
• Moses is claimed to have been a Hebrew
infant found floating on the Nile and taken in
by members of the royal court of Egypt. He isclaimed to have led the Hebrews out of Egypt
and wandered in the desert for forty years insearch of a certain “Promised Land.” He is
said to have spoken to a certain “Jealous God”
who told him to mutilate male infants and also
gave him commandments written on stone
tablets. Egyptian records do not mention such
person by name or description, and theclaimed stone tablets have never been seen or
examined by scholars. The biblical Ten
Commandments text is a mix of 6th c. BC
Jewish religious laws, and articles copied from
Sumerian civil codes reworked to suit Jewish
ideology.
• David and Solomon are claimed to have been
10th c. BC kings of the Hebrews who invaded
Canaan 300 years earlier. Despite extensive
archaeological effort in the 1970s and 1980s
to authenticate a Hebrew king named David,
Yigael Shiloh (Hebrew University), failed to
discover significant evidence of occupation of
any city bearing the name David during the28

10th c. BC. Elsewhere in biblical Judea, noinscriptions of any Judean royalty exists from10th c. BC, nor evidence of a bureaucracy
attached to oil jars associated with any Judean
royalty of the late 8th c. BC. Nothing from any
King Solomon's reign has ever been found.
Surveys of surface finds have shown thatbetween the 16th and 8th c. BC, the entire
population of the hill country of Judea was no
more than about 5000 persons, most of themwandering
pastoralists.
Judeo-Christians
claim, Jesus is a descendant of David. History
disproves this claim; Jews reject it; and Jesus(in Luke 20:44) finds it absurd.
• Other peoples. The overwhelming majority of
Semitic peoples are not Hebrews or Jews. The
overwhelming
majorityof
Judeo-Christianbelievers are not Semites, Hebrews or Jews.
***

29

30

The Great Builder

Many a century ago, agreat builder called Izzu
dedicated his life toteaching people how tobuild the citadel of humanexistence,thefamilyhome. When asked about
his secret, he said: "Dowhat your fathers did inancient times: start by
first digging down to solid
bedrock, and build on
that." So people learned
his secret and built theirhouses on bedrock. But
then the ruling clan of aneighboring land, a clanthat called itself “God's
ChosenContractors”
heard about the greatbuilder and his teachings.
The rulers of this clan felt so threatened by thegreat builder's secret, they had him killed, and“justified” their crime by claiming that the greatbuilder had to be sacrificed to “God” to placate thedivine anger provoked by this “fake” builder's31

“ungodly” teachings. The contractors then chosefrom among themselves one whose mission was tofind and kill all teachers of the great builder's secret
and, to deceive those who had heard about the greatbuilder, to pass himself off as his student. This
impostor traveled far and wide, casting his web of
deceit about both the great builder and himself.
Meanwhile, the remaining conspirators set about todemolish the houses built according to the greatbuilder's secret, and destroyed all written records of
his secret along with their authors. They thenresumed their own construction methods, naming
their new developments "Homes of the Great
Builder."
The tradesmen who built the contractors' houses
did not know the houses they were building were
not founded on bedrock. They used quality materials
and sound trade practices, so the new houses were
well built for family life, and many new houses sold.
But, for some reason, families who dwelt in thesehouses always felt sick when indoors, though they
were fine outside. A few homeowners noted thischange and concluded that whatever was causing
their ailment was confined to their houses. So they
started complaining. To address their complaints,
the contractors put together a homeowner user
manual consisting of bits and pieces of the greatbuilder's teachings they had heard about, their own
32interpretations of his teachings, as well as vast
amounts of fabricated rhetoric glorifying their god
and themselves. They also set up schools—paid forby the homeowners—where the contractors'"experts" interpreted the homeowners user manual,and “explained proper homeownership.” But
whenever the homeowners tried to find answers totheir questions in the user manual or in thecontractors' schools, they kept running into
contradictions that defied common sense. Those who
were not satisfied with the double-talk of the user
manual and its interpretations suspected deception,
demanded straight answers from the contractors,
and tried to persuade other homeowners andtradesmen to join them. The contractors felt sothreatened by such movements, they had these“instigators” killed as well, claiming a need forfurther sacrifices to “God” who was now also
offended by the “ungodly” homeowners' daring
attempts to challenge “His Chosen Contractors.”
Such sacrifices then also served as an example toother would-be “rebels.” And so the homeownerstopped asking questions and just tried to make thebest of a hopeless situation by convincing himselfthat the contractors must be doing what is rightbecause they were, after all, "chosen by God." Once
all traces of the great builder's secret had been
destroyed and the homeowners were silenced, the33contractors started promoting themselves as "God's
Chosen Contractors" and their developments“Homes of the Great Builder” outside their land, too,
including the ancient land of the great builder.
And so it remained for centuries. But then, amiracle happened. Some homeowners gave up
searching for answers in the homeowners user
manual and the contractors' schools, and started
digging around the foundations of their houses tofind the source of their troubles. And in the
excavated material they found all sorts of debris:
broken clay tablets and pottery bearing strange
symbols and writings, complete clay pots still sealed
and containing scriptures of symbols and texts, as
strange as those carved in the clay tablets. They did
not know what they meant, so they started askingaround and also told their neighbors about theirdiscoveries. The contractors got wind of these
discoveries and immediately volunteered theirexperts to decipher them and to make their findings
available. But the artifacts spoke only of the truth:
here was physical evidence that exposed thecontractors' fraud. So the contractors invaded thelands where these artifacts were found anddestroyed every piece of evidence they could find.
But some of the evidence did survive and foundits way into the hands of homeowners andtradesmen who were also schooled in these ancient34writings. These ancient scriptures spoke of a greatbuilder who showed people how to build family
homes according to principles diametrically opposedto those of the contractors. This discovery createdsuch great interest that the contractors started
spending huge amounts of money to discredit it. Butinterest in the great builder's secret, his principles,and also in his identity grew, and more and more
homeowners started digging test holes under thefoundations of their houses to find out what lay
beneath. And what they found was not bedrock but
toxic waste. Since a house is supposed to be not justa house but a home, the sanctuary of family life,
those homeowners who had discovered the reason
their houses made them sick were now faced withthe decision of their lives. They could convince
themselves that their neighbors' interpretations
must be wrong because their houses were built by"God's Chosen Contractors" and continue to seek
answers to their misfortune in the homeowners user
manual and the contractors' schools. Or they could
abandon their houses and become street people, orfind other solutions to their families' housing needs.
Or they could confront the source of theirmisfortune head on. They would have to dig out all
the waste material from under their houses and,with or without the help of tradesmen, repair the
structure damaged by the shock the building would35

suffer when it fell to the bedrock. They would also
have to throw out all the broken family heirlooms
and icons of the god of toxic waste. But a newunderstanding of proper house foundation would
become clear and, most important, no morepoisonous fumes in their homes. From this point
forward, their houses, now founded on solid bedrockaccording to the secret of the great builder, would
become homes they could get attached to, love andgladly keep in good repair.
Ladies and gentlemen of “Christianity”: This
study was undertaken to reveal the reality of our“homeownership.” Our homes are our religious
beliefs, which, for centuries, we have founded not on
the solid bedrock of truth Jesus came to revive, buton the garbage dump of morality, Old Testament
Jewish ideology. The impostor is non other than the
Jewish priest chosen by the religious dictatorship ofbiblical Judea to persecute Jesus' fold, and to hijack
Christianity and turn it into a new Jewish sect for
Gentiles, a rabbi known as Saul, Judeo-Christianity's
Saint Paul. (Rabbi Saul's successors include suchself-confessed Jews as Cardinal Aaron Lustiger ["I
was born Jewish and so I remain" - 1981]). The
tradesmen are the many low-ranking members of
the clergy, nuns and lay advocates of Christianmorality. Their hard work, kindness and selflessness,and the moral principles they teach have36contributed much to humanity's welfare. Therefore,
nothing in these lines is meant to hold these
dedicated people responsible for the doings of the
Church. Most of them sincerely believe and teachJesus' message to Mankind. They just do not know
his identity and history have been hijacked.
The land of the great builder is biblical Galilee
and Samaria and, from a cultural perspective,
today's Christian world. Their populations are theindigenous peoples of Central Eurasia. They believe
in a supernatural, benevolent divine entity, and live
according to principles of neighborly love, humanequality at birth and spiritual growth throughknowledge. However, during their contacts withother cultures over the centuries, many of them
have lost their ancestors' spirituality. By the time ofJesus' birth, wars are frequent; spirituality has often
given way to materialism; standards of living havebeen declining; and their brethren have been
suffering under the rule of an oppressive alien
ideology.
The neighboring land, biblical Judea, and cultural
Judaism, is a quite different place and realm. Here,people live according to rules dictated by religious
laws founded on fear of a wrathful, intolerant god
who forbids—under penalty of death—quest forknowledge of right and wrong. In the absence ofsuch knowledge, people are easily led to believe37selfish religious dogmas. Judaism teaches them thatJews are the supreme race chosen by “God” tosubjugate other peoples, and that their contact withthe rest of humanity should be governed by theprinciples of animal husbandry (Jews consider nonJews animals, specifically, donkeys [Ezekiel 23:20]).
Such ignorance and arrogance then translates tobehavior—which Jews consider righteous—society
finds revolting.
The relationship between Jews and theirneighbors is best defined as failed isolation. Eachside wants to keep its distance from the other but indifferent ways. Jews want to isolate themselves
racially and culturally, whereas their neighbors want
to insulate themselves from the Jewry physically.
Jews consider non-Jews racially inferior andculturally threatening, whereas their neighbors
consider Jews aggressive human parasites. But sofar, both sides have failed to achieve their goals.
Mixed marriages are not uncommon and Jews arefound everywhere. The two opposing culturescontinue to coexist but for different reasons. Jews
depend on the rest of humanity for their existence:
they pursue and attach themselves to affluent
societies for sustenance. Their neighbors, on theother hand, feel compelled to live by principles oftolerance, and accept the Jewry among themselves.
Conflict breaks out whenever the Jews' immoral
38

behavior becomes intolerable to their neighbors whothen object to such behavior. Jewish leadership thentypically responds by launching a well-rehearsed
deceit campaign. It begins by poisoning the well—alogical fallacy tactic used to attack arguments
known to be valid by assailing the character of thepersonraising
them—withmassivesmear
campaigns in which it accuses the objectors of thevery racism its own culture is founded upon. It seeks
public sympathy by haranguing principles oftolerance,
andbyclaiming
historic
racialpersecution by intolerant people, regimes, groups,
cliques—as circumstances warrant—who reject suchprinciples. Once the masses have been misled, thesame Jews who annually (Yom Kippur) reconfirm
their contempt for the rest of humanity by publicly
renouncing, in advance, all vows and pledges they
will make under oath during the coming year, andteach their children that non-Jews are subhumans,
now promote themselves as incarnations of honesty,
tolerance, compassion and righteousness, crusadersand guardians of racial equality, human rights andhumanity itself, and lobby governments to “protect
the citizenry” from intolerant “fascists.” They bribeand intimidate lawmakers, threaten economic
sanctions, and “demand in the name of the people,”laws that decree all forms of criticism of Jews racist“hate crimes,” and severely punish anyone who
39

publishes evidence that exposes the truth about the
Jewry's actions, ideologies, culture and claims. Suchmaneuvers then not only criminalize objections to
the Jews' behavior—as well as all future objective
research—but send a chill down society's spine
when it realizes it is ruled by a new reign of terror.
To top it off, they demand laws that force thetaxpayer to support them and to pay for theircampaigns of deceit and extortion. Enslaved
governments safeguard and promote Jewish
interests by enacting unjust laws such as
Bankruptcy Acts, which erase a business' debts by
converting them to losses for its creditors—pension
funds, small investors, ordinary tradesmen (e.g., in
the construction industry), and consumers andtaxpayers.
These
governments
force
Jewishpropaganda into taxpayer-funded schools—and evenkindergartens—as compulsory educational material.
They award the Jewry obscene compensations thatspan generations for fictitious wrongs and canceledgovernment contracts—which the Jews themselvesengineer—as well as taxpayer gifts that exceed theannual budgets of most countries to wealthy Jewish
financiers (bankers), speculators and industrialists
under the guise of “economic stabilization
initiatives”—or similar deceptive excuses.
By searching for the truth, however, we can see
through their web of deceit. We begin by validating40

their claim of historical persecution driven by racialintolerance, the cornerstone of their argument. If
this single claim turns out to be false, then their
entire argument collapses. Next, we evaluate theiraccess to historical records and their ability tointerpret them. If we find that they are able toaccess and interpret history but deliberately
misrepresent their findings, then their claim is not
only false but also fraudulent, and the scam
becomes self-evident. So the first step is to analyze
the past 4500 years of relevant human history to
determine whether society had persecuted people of
the Semitic race. When recorded individual andcollective acts considered immoral by society areplotted on the chart of human history, prorated
according to cultural representation of populations,the chart becomes a dark trail of the migrations notof the race later labeled Semitic (Arabs are also
Semites), but of one specific people, identified by its
behavior, called Semites, Hebrews or Jews.
They are known as Semites because that is how
they refer to themselves (descendants of Shem), andas habiru, written today as Hebrew. The word
habiru, literally, “they who murder with webs,” isfirst encountered around 2300 BC in reference to
the Semitic tribe led by Sargon I who entraps his
benefactor,
theChaldean-Sumerian
king,Lugalzagizi, in a web of deceit, murders him, installs
41himself on the kings throne, and takes over politicalpower. He has the rulers of the Chaldean-Sumeriancity-states assassinated and decimates their
populations. Professor Noah Kramer writes thatfrom this point on, the history of Mesopotamia isnone other than the life and death struggle of theCharldean-Sumerian and Semitic peoples. 2150 BC
Sumerian documents from Ur describe the Hebrews
as a:“... people who travel in dead silence, who
destroy everything, whose menfolk go where
they will — they establish their tents and theircamps — they spend their time in the
countryside without observing the decrees of
my king."
The Sumerian logogram SA.GAZ is translated as
habbaru and habattu, meaning “brigand, robber,
highwayman." 14th century BC correspondence
between the Egyptians and the Canaanites, theAmarna Letters, also call the vagrant Semites
habiru, Hebrews. Abdi-Heba, the 1330s BC Egyptianvassal ruler of Jerusalem during the Amarna
Alliance, writes a series of letters to the Egyptian
Pharaoh complaining about the activities of the"Habiru, who are plundering the lands of the king.”
Carol Redmount (Bitter Lives: Israel in and out of
Egypt, The Oxford History of the Biblical World
writes that the Habiru:
42

“... led a marginal and sometimes lawless
existence on the fringes of settled society... aloosely defined, inferior social class composedof shifting and shifty population elements
without secure ties to settled communities who
are referred to 'as outlaws, mercenaries, andslaves' in ancient texts.”
Every society that has come in contact with thispeople remembers the experience in much the sameway. They invariably refer to the Hebrews as lawlessdrifters who leave behind a trail of death anddestruction. This chart clearly shows that when thepeople called “Semites,” “Hebrews” and “Jews” isjudged solely by its actions, society finds its conduct,
not its race, repulsive.
In step two, we find that historical records are
not only accessible to Jewish scholars but, in somecases, accessible only to them (Dead Sea Scrolls).
We also find that their scholars hold the highest
credentials and that their research projects are wellfunded. Therefore, they must be deemed to be fully
aware of the truth, and any claim to the contrary can
onlybeconsidered
deliberate
historicalmisrepresentation. The logical conclusion is that alllaws rooted in claims of historical persecution ofJews by “intolerant fascists” are proceeds of cleverly
executed scams conceived to deliver the paralyzing
stings that turn society into the host of a parasitic
43

people.
History not only exonerates the Jews' neighbors,
but also validates their objections. Immorality driven
by racism, greed, vengeance and hatred is found in
all cultures. What sets the Jewry apart is that suchsocial evils are the principles Judaism is founded
upon, rather than exceptional deviance. Whereas
other cultures consider such doctrines social evils to
discourage through education, civil laws and justgovernance, Judaism considers them religious
righteousness to uphold through deceit, religious
laws and political manipulation. Historically,
individual immoral acts committed by Jews result inpublic outrage which is then stifled by immoral acts
(disinformation campaigns, “purchasing” unjust
laws, financing “sympathetic” regimes, and so forth)committed by their leaders. The effect of this vicious
circle is social turmoil fueled by monumental
injustices, death and destruction to which allsocieties who come in contact with the Jewry
eventually react by insulating themselves from thispeople. The consequence of such insulation for the
Jewry is loss of any benefits of extra-cultural
thinking about divinity and standards of morality.
These unfortunate people find themselves stalled on
the fringes of humanity not because they areincapable of neighborly love or any expression ofhuman decency, not because they are in anyway
44

inferior or born with spiritual deficiencies, andcertainly not because society is racist. They arestagnating because their leaders condemn them tospiritual dwarfism and moral exile. (It is of utmost
importance to keep in mind that, just as there aremorally bankrupt “Gentiles,” there are also so-called“Jews” who are compassionate and caring humanbeings, honest, trustworthy individuals, patriotic
citizens and sincere advocates of Mankind. Society's
aversion is to people who preach, enforce, practice,or condone the ideologies of Judaism, whatever theirrace, culture, or religion—if any.)
The Jews' neighbors, for their part, are inperpetual conflict with their conscience, trying tofind a practical balance between tolerance andsurvival. At first, they tolerate the Jewry's behavior,
allowing it time to adjust to its new social
environment. But when they realize that, after many
generations, Jews have not only refused to adopt thestandards of morality society demands of everyone
but have worked their way into the heart of the local
culture and are corrupting it from within, thependulum swings the other way and society either
banishes the Jewry or emigrates.
Finally, the clay tablets and scriptures found in
the debris around dug-up foundations are theancient Sumerian and Coptic texts. They started tosprout everywhere and people by the thousands are45

taking an interest in what they have to say. That is
why there is so much new money being spent on
their destruction and on massive disinformation—via
all media of news, education and entertainment—to
suppress the truth they reveal. A recent example isthe unprecedented destruction of evidence of anearly civilization. In January 2003, American
scholars (McGuire Gibson, University of Chicago's
Oriental Institute, and others) plead with the U.S.
military to spare and protect excavation sites andmuseums located in ancient Mesopotamia, and evenprovide lists and maps. Yet, despite the U.S. Defense
Department's assurances—and occupying powers'
international obligations—the
Iraq War has,“inexplicably,” resulted in the greatest archeologicallosses ever. Guy Gugliotta reports:“...with U.S. forces firmly in control of
Baghdad last week [April 11-12], lootersbreached the museum [National Museum of
Antiquities], trashed its galleries, burned its
records, invaded its vaults and smashed or
carried off thousands of artifacts dating fromthe founding of ancient Sumer...” (Washington
Post, April 14, 2003, p. A19).
Then, on April 14th, unarmed “looters” burndown the Iraqi National Library and Archives(Professor Emeritus Chalmers Johnson, The Smashof Civilizations), while occupation forces sit in their46

tanks and Humvees and watch. Reading thesereports, logical questions emerge: How could socalled “looters” gain entry into museums andlibraries protected by the world's only superpower“firmly in control,” and why would “looters” trash
museum galleries, burn records and historicalevidence, and smash artifacts—rather than sackobjects of street value? Were the armed occupation
forces guarding humanity's treasures or protecting
the “looters” from the irate population? Were thelists and maps provided by scholars used to protect,or to target the museums and dig sites? Who could
possibly benefit from the destruction of historicalevidence? The logical suspects are the beneficiaries
of historical fraud, whose “advisor” to the U.S.
administration in 2003 is long-time supporter ofZionism and self-confessed “friend of Israel,” son ofa Jewish Immigrant from Poland, architect of the
Iraq War, U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul
Wolfowitz, who “advises” the U.S. administration to
attack Iraq and destroy its stockpile of “Weapons ofMass Destruction.” For surely, these records andartifacts are the weapons that can destroy massproduced historical fabrications.
The thinking man realizes that, though “God's
Chosen Contractors” are tenaciously holding onto
much of the material world, their grip on world
thinking is slipping. Scholars are uncovering the47

Jewry's frauds, historical falsifications engineered toglorify a select people and reduce the rest of
humanity to servants of a self-declared “masterrace.” Christians are finding out the truth about
Church dogma, hijacked principles of morality
intended for the elevation of Mankind but converted
to principles of servitude that reduce Man fromparticipant in God's Creation to pathetic slave(“sinner”). Despite desperate measures to hide thetruth, “the neighbors” are finding their true heritage
and the secret of their “great builder,” Jesus.
So we all have a life decision to make. Everyone
has the right to choose his or her own path and, aslong as it does not wrong someone else, no one has
the right to judge another's choice. We can convince
ourselves that “The Church” knows what is best for
us and continue to seek solution to our misfortune in
Judeo-Christianity's dogma, spelled out in its“homeowners user manual,” the Bible, and in its
religious schools, our churches; abandon religion
altogether and seek comfort in spiritual ignorance;or convert to another faith. Or we can join the effort
to rescue Jesus' hijacked identity and history. But bewarned: if you decide to excavate the waste material
from beneath the foundation of your faith, your“home” will suddenly drop to Jesus' solid bedrock oftruth, shattering beliefs you and your ancestors haveheld so dear throughout the ages, beliefs you are48

expected to pass on to your children andgrandchildren. Yes, it is an enormous responsibility.
If your resolve to seek the truth is weak, you will
hesitate when you discover the real Jesus: the shock
will be too much to bear. If that happens, stop!
Cleanse your mind of biases and meditate over every
piece of new knowledge until you come to your own
conclusions before proceeding. It is not necessary toadopt someone else's perception of the truth. As thematter of fact, it is wise to subject all claims of “thetruth” to scrutiny. Dogmas are stray seeds that findtheir way into the fertile soil of the human mind. So
it takes disciplined intellectual effort to identify andweed out parasitic ideologies that choke theknowledge needed for spiritual growth. Besides,
someone else's beliefs, even if sincere, will nevergrow permanent roots in another's mind. Genuine
faith can sprout only from awareness. However, if
you are determined to seek the Truth but not sure
you have the calling to share your discoveries withyour loved ones, then ask Jesus to help you decide.
In the hour of your decision, listen to his words ofencouragement to his disciples:"Do not worry beforehand about what you areto say, but say whatever is given you in that
hour; for it is not you who speak, but it is theHoly Spirit" (Mark 13:9, 11).

49

Searching for the truth
In any detective work, potential leads come tolight which are then followed. They can bestatements which may or may not be factual,physical evidence, and motives—most importantly,
cui bono, that is, who benefits? Even probabilities,
opinions and circumstances that help construct the“picture puzzle” are followed. If a piece seems to fit,
it is placed in the picture where it remains unless it
proves to be false. Leads can be followed
sequentially down a thread, as in verifying
statements, or analyzed in parallel, as in relating
details to each other. Whenever a thread is followed
down, we begin with the whole and work down
toward the parts. If the parts are absent orcontradict the whole, then the truthfulness of thewhole becomes suspicious. During an investigation,
if a "Person of Interest" cannot give a detailed
account of his activities, or if the details he provides
do not support his statement, he becomes a suspect
because the parts do not constitute the whole. Thisis the primary tool to detect a lie. A truthful person
can provide reasonable details of a truthful eventand repeat them many times because he remembers
the experience. A liar, on the other hand, will find it
more and more difficult to fabricate coherent details
to support a lie as demand for precision increases.
50

He will be unable to repeat them on subsequentinterviews because he must either re-fabricate themor recall his previous fabrications. Either way, atsome point the volume of fabricated details will
exceed his mental capacity. And when that happens,
his story either changes of falls apart completely.
What the interviewer looks for is the difference
between the impact a real experience has on areasonable person's memory and that of afabrication. This skill can be compared toassembling a picture puzzle by noting the picture on
the box, but turning the pieces over to hide theirmarkings, and following the designer's instructions
to fit the pieces together. Pieces that do not fit
anywhere are rejected as false and any holes are left
empty. The puzzle is then turned over and its image
is compared with the picture on the box. If theimages do not match, then the designer's statement
regarding the picture on the box is false.
Whenever we think parallel, we relate the parts
to each other in the hope of generating a pattern. In
this case, we have no idea what the finished puzzle
will look like—there is no picture on the box. This
time we lay the pieces with their markings up, andtry to fit them together by simultaneously matchingboth their shapes and markings. A piece is fitted into
place even if it is blank, that is, not painted. Whenthe puzzle is finished, an image will, hopefully,
51

emerge. Blank pieces are then provisionally drawn
by completing its neighborhood's pattern. These
provisionally marked pieces (hypotheses) thenbecome objects of further research to validate ourassumptions about their markings.
Such assumptions, however, will be false if theneighborhood itself is false. For example, false
beliefs regarding the people history calls Ethiopians
lead to the false assumption that they are natives oftoday's Ethiopia. They are not. History, geography
and poetry (Herodotos, Pliny, Strabo, Eschyl, Homer,
Pindar), identify the Ethiopians (Aithiops) as
Scythians who dwell in East and Central Asia andEurope. Hesiod places them in the Halys river
region (today's Turkey), while legends attributed toHomer call Ethiopians “people who dwell in the Far
East and the Far West” (from Greece). The so-called
Essenes are also believed to be Aithiops. Scythians
bring civilization to many parts of the world,
including the Cataracts of the Nile, but that does notmake them natives of (today's) Ethiopia. Similarly,
Scythians of Iberia (Caucasus region) bringcivilization to the Iberian Peninsula (today's Spain
and Portugal). However, unlike the Ethiopians, who
derive their name from their Scythian benefactors,
today's Spaniards do not call themselves Iberians(save a political minority, the Basque-Scythians).
When dealing with religious and political “picture52

puzzles,” the researcher must overcome an
additional challenge. He must sort through vast
amounts of pieces deliberately repainted to hide thetruth and to mislead him. The skilled liar will
incorporate huge quantities of verifiable but
irrelevant facts in his story to make it seem truthful.
For example, if a salesman at the front door says he
was so impressed by the quality of his product that
he bought the company, it does not mean he is not
the owner. However, if he knew that the company
manufactured low-grade products, then his claim is,in substance, a lie. Similarly, Dan Brown's The Da
Vinci Code is a hoax packaged in verifiable facts tocreate an appearance of truth by association. In
such cases, the design on repainted pieces will haveto be first identified as false, and then wiped clean
before a pattern can be extended onto them.
The first steps in identifying falsely marked
pieces are disambiguation of terms and verificationof claims. Disinformation, the propagation of
information know to be false, often relies ondeliberate misuse of terms to create confusion andfraud. Though the Bible and historical literature is
replete with deliberately misused terms and false
claims, two examples should suffice to expose
disinformation at work: identity theft and translation
fraud. The word Izrael is a Sumerian compound
word: Iz-Ra-El: Iz, L (Labat) 296: divine spirit; Ra,53

L.381, 293: light, brilliance, purity; El, L.13, 564:
clean, purification, heaven, elevated to God's regard.
It means a people who, in the Sumerian culture,
believed these attributes applied to them. These
Turanian people, originally from the Caucasus
region (a geographic reference used to define a
race, “Caucasian”), have no racial or cultural ties
with the Semitic tribes (also a term used to define arace of humanity, distinct from others) who
infiltrated Mesopotamia and Canaan thousands ofyears later. Therefore, under no circumstances can
Semites, Hebrews or Jews be identified as thisancient Turanian people (Sir Leonard Woolley: A
Forgotten Kingdom, Pelikan Books, 1958). In
Judaism and Judeo-Christianity, the word Israel first
appears as the name Jacob, Abraham's supposed
grandson, appropriates before entering Egypt, andlater gives his sons when he appoints them heads ofthe biblical Twelve Tribes of Israel (2nd millennium
BC—according to students of these religions):"And God said unto him, 'Thy name is Jacob:
thy name shall not be called any more Jacob,
but Israel shall be thy name:' and he called his
name Israel" (Genesis 35:10).
Pragmatic history often confirms or negates any
cause-effect relationships between co-occurring
events. Common sense suggests that Hebrew tribes
took on this alias to pass themselves off as54

Sumerians to gain entry into Egypt. Later, the word
Israel competes with Zion and Judea for the name of
the new Jewish state. However, outside religious
literature and political fabrications, nowhere are theIzrael people identified as Semites, Hebrews or
Jews. Further, the constant wars between the Izrael
and Semitic (Hebrew, Jewish) peoples confirms thedisassociation between these two racially andculturally different people.
The history of the Jewry is replete with acts ofidentity theft. Sargon appropriates the Turanian
Agade (Akkad) name for his family's brief (130 year)
rule. When the priest-kings of Semitic Babylon
invent their new god, Ea, they appropriate theidentifying symbol of the Sumerians' Innana (fourwedges) to identify themselves. They also
appropriate the bird symbol of the Sumerians'
Queen of Heaven and rename it Sippora. We know ofa (non-Semitic) Hurrian in Haran, Abram, who muchlater (18th century BC) inexplicably becomes thebiblical Semite, Abraham. Hebrews of Upper Egypt(retroactively) appropriate the Aithiop name (asubculture of the Scythian, Kus people [5500 BC]),
remove the word Kus (Cush) from scriptures andreplace it with the word Ethiopian (e.g., King James
Bible), and begin calling themselves Ethiopian Jews,
founders of a Semitic Ethiopian culture. In the Bible,
the Hebrew Jacob's supposed son, Joseph,55

impersonates “King Tut's” (Tudonk-a-mén, from
Baráth) 14th century BC Chaldean administrator
magus (Maya). Rabbi Saul, Judeo-Christianity's SaintPaul, appropriates Simon the Canaanite's calling andpasses himself off as Jesus' apostle. JudeoChristianity appropriates the name of the Egyptiansun-god, Chrestos, and changes it to Christos, theGreek word for the Jews' messiah who later becomesits “Christ.” In the Holy Roman Empire, Jews begin
calling themselves Ashkenazim, the name of a
Turanian people with whom they have nothing incommon. During the Early Modern Period, Jews
resort to a logical fallacy to pass themselves off as
the ancient people of Mesopotamia. They begin to
identify themselves with the diagram the Sumerians
used to relate the Heavenly Trinity of Light to its
earthly counterpart, a geometric figure the Jews saw
in Babylon and later rename Star of David. They
then point to Sumerian artifacts that depict thisdiagram as “proof” of their claim. And so we could
continue. The Caucasian Ut-nap-ishtim becomes the
950-year-old Noah, ancestor of Semites; Mary andJesus become Jews; the Hun (Celtic) Cross becomes
the Christian Cross, and so on.
Search for the truth must also go beyond
discovering identity theft. Both the source of
information and the time of identity appropriationmust also be noted so that actions can be associated56

with the right subjects. It is important to note who is
speaking: the name's rightful owner, the thief, or athird party? Further, actions themselves also need tobe verified. Whereas it is often difficult to spot a
fraud committed centuries ago, catching aperpetrator in the act clearly exposes not only the
fraud but also the scammer's mode of operation.
Today,
systematic
disinformation
campaigns
designed to disseminate historical falsifications
masquerading as scientific discoveries are sweeping
the world, so examples of fraud abound. One such
example,however,shouldsuffice.
National
Geographic's much publicized production, The
Gospel of Judas, translated by Rodolphe Kasser,
Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, in collaboration
with François Gaudard, is a propaganda masterpiecebased on The Gospel of Judas, edited by these samescholars and published in book form, complete withcommentary by The National Geographic Society,and financed by billionaire Ted Waitt, member of theAdvisory Council of that society. Beyond arguments
already presented in other papers that refute thecredibility of this production, the following discovery
can be safely considered evidence of translation
fraud.
April D. DeConick, professor of Biblical Studies at
Rice University, reports in the New York Times(December 1, 2007), Gospel Truth, that the National
57

Geographic translation was critically faulty in many
substantial respects when it aired its production.
Based on a corrected translation, she proves thatthe document states the opposite of what National
Geographic's translators claim. After re-translating
the text, she published The Thirteenth Apostle.
According to correct translation, the author of themanuscript states that Judas did, in fact, betray
Jesus—rather than follow his orders, as Kasser et alclaim. Further, the text says that "Judas is not set
apart 'for' the holy generation, as the National
Geographic translation claims," DeConick asserted:"he is separated 'from' it." The translators dropped anegative from a crucial sentence, an “error,”National Geographic admits, changes the import.
"Were they genuine errors or was something moredeliberate going on?" DeConick asked in the Op-Ed
page of the Times.
It is naïve to think that this production isanything but a deliberately falsified translation of amanuscript that states the opposite of what Kasser,
et al claim. Given the credentials of the translatorsand editors, it is inconceivable that each one ofthese scholars, in succession, separately and jointly,
would not only make such novice mistakes asreading the word “demon” as “spirit” and droppinga critical negative, but all of them dropping thesame negative from the same sentence—and58

nowhere else—from the sentence that just happens
to convey the gist of the message, turning thetranslation into a claim that is the opposite of theoriginal statement. Yet, despite getting caught redhanded,
National
Geographic
continues
topropagate claims it admits are false.
These examples show why it is so difficult to see
through centuries of disinformation. However,armed with the necessary knowledge and mental
discipline, we can recognize the repainted pieces ofthe puzzle, wipe them clean and redraw them using
our knowledge of the era and a healthy dose ofcommon sense. Even if the redrawn pieces remain to
be individually validated, the ensemble usuallyeither confirms or negates our hypotheses.
Common sense also dictates that we do notconfuse inexplicable with impossible and discard areportjustbecauseit
defiesexplanation.
Impossibility is a logical (definite) conclusion basedon knowledge (proof that excludes possibility),
whereas inexplicability is the (indefinite) inability todraw a conclusion for want of knowledge. Our
physical world is full of phenomena we can observe
but cannot (yet) explain, as evidenced by discoveriesof phenomenal functions, from subatomic toastronomical. So even in our physical world, we areoften stunned by observations we feel we should be
able to explain but cannot (e.g., the source of the59

Universe). How much more so in the case ofphenomena we cannot even observe (e.g., an idea
before its birth)? Mary's conception, Lazar's returnfrom the dead, Jesus' resurrection are examples ofreported occurrences we cannot explain. We cometo terms with this reality by realizing that ourinability to explain something reveals not the limitsof possibility but rather, the limits of our knowledge.
“Inexplicable” reports should be left as “holes” inthe composition—perhaps to be filled at a later time.
A degree on mental discipline is needed to leavethese holes intact, that is, to resist the temptation to
force
an
image
thoughcreativethinking(fabricating) or by “closing up” the picture. Even if
spotted with empty holes, we will have a generalidea of the composition.
So let us put on our gumshoes and examine therelevant political and cultural climates of Jesus'
time, his background and historical events to findout who he was, what he taught, and what happened
to him and his teaching.
In this work, Hungarian is often cited as areference language to convey the meaning ofdifficult concepts, especially those found in ancient"Sumerian writings." In the English speaking world,
the words "Sumer" and "Sumerian" generally referto the land and the non-Semitic peoples who lived inand around Mesopotamia, between the 6th and 2nd60

millennia BC, and spoke an agglutinative language.
The word "Sumer" derives from the name of the Sapir (sun-faced, sun-facing), Szabir people who turntheir faces toward the sun and the Heavens to pray.
This word is still in use today to identify Árpád's
historical Magyars. If the choice of this language
suggests nationalistic undertones, then the reader is
encouraged to consider the opinions of worldrenown linguists and other experts in their fields. An
extensive list of scholars agree that, because of its
age, precisionand kinship with "Sumerian,"
Hungarian is the language best suited to extract theoriginal concepts embedded in ancient "Sumerian
texts." However, to dispel any suspicion of bias, only
the learned opinions of foreign experts are quoted
here.
• GroverS.
Krantz,anthropologistatWashington State University studied thehistory and origin of the various European
languages and published his findings in thebook, Geographical Development of European
Languages (Peter Lang, 1988). He states, "It is
usually stated that the Uralic Magyars moved
into Hungary from an eastern source in the
9th century A.D. I find instead that all theother Uralic speakers expanded out of
Hungary in the opposite direction, and at amuch earlier date" (page 11) ..."Given these61

objections
theactualUralic-speaking
distributions would allow only one alternative
explanation - that the family originated in
Hungary and spread out in the opposite
direction. This poses no serious problem if thetime for this origin and dispersion is put at theearliest Neolithic. If this is true it means that
Hungarian (Magyar) is actually the oldest inplace language in all of Europe" (page 72).
• Archibald Sayce, Professor of Oriental Studies
in Oxford deciphered the first Sumerian text
and gave a linguistic analysis of the language.
He used comparative linguistics to study
different branches of the language. In thecourse of his research, he examined therelationship of the languages of the entire
Turanian language family with the Sumerian
language. He found the closest relationship to
Sumerian in the Hungarian and Basquelanguages. He went to Hungary to learn
Hungarian, and found it to be "the most usefullanguage to read Sumerian texts."• Jules Oppert emphasized the relationship of
the Sumerian and Hungarian languages.
• Jakob Ludwig Karl Grimm established therules for sound progression and was the firstto write German Grammar. He stated that the
Hungarian language is logical, has a perfect
62

•

•

•

•

structure and surpasses every other language,
and recommended Hungarian as the ideal
universal language.
R. Nisbet Bain, a savant with the British
Museum was extraordinarily proficient inlanguages.
Hedescribeda
Hungariansentence as "A miracle of agglutinative
ingenuity."
Ebersberg,
Austrianlinguist:"The
construction of the Hungarian language is as if
it had been created by a task force of linguists
striving for conciseness, regularity, harmony
and clarity."
Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti, Italian, directorof the Library of the Vatican, spoke many
languages, including Hungarian. He stated(with some cynicism) that "The Hungarians do
not even know what cultural treasure theirlanguage possesses."
Sir John Bowring, English traveler and writervisited Hungary and published an anthology in
English of the work of Hungarian writers andpoets. He remarked that "The Hungarian
language goes far back. It developed in a very
peculiar manner and its structure reaches
back to times when most of the now spoken
European languages did not even exist. It is alanguage which developed steadily and firmly
63

in itself, and in which there are logic andmathematics with the adaptability andmalleability of strength and chords. The
Englishman should be proud that his language
indicates an epic of human history. One canshow forth its origin; and all layers can be
distinguished in it, which gathered together
during contacts with different nations.
Whereas the Hungarian language is like arubble-stone, consisting of only one piece, on
which the storms of time left not a scratch. It's
not a calendar that adjusts to the changes of
the ages. It needs no one, it doesn't borrow,does no huckstering, and doesn't give or takefrom anyone. This language is the oldest andmostglorious
monumentofnational
sovereignty and mental independence. Whatscholars cannot solve, they ignore. In philology
it's the same way as in archeology. The floorsof the old Egyptian temples, which were madeout of only one rock, can't be explained. No
one knows where they came from, or fromwhich mountain the wondrous mass was
taken; how they were transported and lifted tothe top of the temples. The genuineness of the
Hungarian language is a phenomenon much
more wondrous than this."64Introduction
A man called IZ-ZU, (Logos, divine wisdom)
known to history, theology, and followers of several
major religions as Jesus Christ was brutally tortured
and crucified in Judea 1700 (2000) years ago. But
why? What did he do to deserve such vicious
treatment? Accounts of his activities speak only of aman who healed the sick, advanced a recipe forpeaceful human coexistence and encouraged Man toseek the truth. He advocated such virtues ascompassion, understanding, mercy, selflessness andquest for knowledge, qualities we normally associatewith social harmony and self-improvement. So why
kill someone who teaches people how to get along
and how to improve society at the individual level?
What possible benefit could a regime see inpermanently silencing a promoter of peacefulcoexistence and human evolution? The logicalanswer is, any benefit derived from social discord or
the suppression of human growth. So the next stepis to find out if social discord can benefit a regime.
All political leaders, regardless of their ultimate
goals, are intelligent people or else they would nothave become or remained leaders. And intelligent
leadership includes keeping internal peace to assure
unity of purpose, regardless of what that purpose
might be. Therefore, social discord is unlikely to65benefit anyone in power. That leaves suppression ofhuman progress as the only logical benefit.
Christianity teaches that Mankind's ancestors
angered the Jews' wrathful god by seeking
knowledge of right and wrong. This god became so
furious, he condemned Man to a life of misery andsuffering on Earth followed by the end of Man's
existence. Its teaching further suggests that theritual human sacrifice of a savior of humanity to thisspectator god will appease the divine anger
provoked by Man's “insolent” search for morality
and his other “sins” of disobedience, but that thisblood-thirsty god, having savored the pleasures ofwatching Jesus' agonizing torture and death, will bepleased enough with the spectacle to restore eternal
life to all who henceforth obey him without question.
This ideology is a reflection of a basic tenet of
Judaism: an intolerant, wrathful vengeful god can beplacated by shedding the blood of innocent animals,
including “subhuman” goiims (non-Jews). Spelled
out in different words to hide its substance fromconsciousness (satisfaction, ransom, penal rhetoric“explaining atonement”), this is the subliminal
message taught in Christian churches and Sunday
schools.
Christianity is teaching our children that Jesus
had to be killed so he could save Mankind by wiping
away humanity's sins with his blood. Professor
66

Badiny's (and others) sleuth work, however,suggests a different motive: fear of a teacher who
gives the ignorant the power to rid himself ofparasites.

67

Background
Judea is the jurisdiction in which Jesus is killed.
Judaism is Judea's state-religion, the only religion
permitted under the law. This law does not apply topersonnel of the controlling power stationed in
Judea, the Romans, but for everyone else, thepractice of any religion other than Judaism isprohibited. Enactment and enforcement of religious
laws is reserved exclusively for the high-priests of
the Temple of Jerusalem. They alone have the power
to set, teach, judge and enforce religious ideologies
and activities, and to prescribe punishment foroffenders. One such ordinance stipulates that every
faith, ideology, or concept of any divinity outside of
Judaism is heresy; and that advocates of such “otherfaiths” are to be considered false prophets and must
be killed.
"If there arise among you a prophet or a
dreamer of dreams... that prophet, or thatdreamer of dreams, shall be put to death..."(Deuteronomy 13:1,5).
Jesus is not a high-priest of the Temple ofJerusalem and, therefore, is barred from any
religious leadership role while in Judea. More
important, rather than acknowledge the merciless,vengeful Jewish god, Yahweh, reserved for Jews
alone, he educates people about a merciful forgiving
68God, the “Father,” who loves everyone alike. He
makes a deliberate distinction between his Heavenly
Father and the Jews' father, Yahweh, when he states:"...If God were your father, you would love me
because I derive and came from God... You areof the evil father and you wish to fulfill yourfather's wishes. He was a murderer from the
beginning, not holding to the Truth, for there
is no Truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his
native language, for he is a liar and the fatherof lies" (John 8:42-44).
The Jews specifically ask Jesus to confirm theirassessment of him and his rejection of Judaism:"... Are we not right in saying that you are a
Samaritan and demon-possessed?” (John 8:48).
Since his teachings not only diverge from, but
directly oppose Judaism, the high-priest of the
Temple of Jerusalem declare him a false prophet,and initiate proceedings to have him killed. Jesus isaware of their intent when he says in John 8:37-38:"...You want to kill me because my words findno home with you. I speak of what I saw at my
Father's; you, too, do what you do because thatis what you saw at your fathers'."
The Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, however,refuses to execute Jesus. Rather, he delivers him
into the hands of the Jews to do whatever they wantwith him, and "washes his hands" of what might69

happen to Jesus. The high-priests then order the
mercenary guards of the Temple of Jerusalem topublicly torture and crucify Jesus.
The degree of cruelty the Jews inflict on Jesus
suggests more than just enforcement of laws: itsuggest a desire to inflict maximum pain. But why?
To answer that question we must look at both thevictim and his assailants.

70

Jesus' lineage
Jesus teaches neighborly love and the compassionof a Father who loves everyone alike. Therefore, hisbiological background ought not matter to those
who believe in him. And it does not: that is, it does
not matter until a racist group starts claiming him"their son," and based on that claim, falsifies his
lineage and distorts his teachings to bring them inline with the racist, cultural and religious ideologiesof that group for political purposes. Therefore,
upholding his teachings means challenging any
claim of ancestry fabricated to serve the political
agenda of a select group. There are two ways tochallenge this claim. One is to disprove it. The other,to prove a different lineage. Either method should
suffice to expose such fraud. However, when bothmethods prove the claim fraudulent, then even themost “politically correct” researcher must yield toreason. So, in that spirit, let us begin our search forthe truth about Jesus, starting with his birth.
Jesus explains the purpose of his birth in theGospel of John:"I have come as Light into the World, so thateveryone who believes in Me will not remain in
darkness" (12:46).
Here, the word to remember is “Light.” This
single word tells more about Jesus than any other71reference—as we shall see.
Millions of Christians around the world celebrate
Jesus' birth at Christmas, at the time of the rebirthof light. But following his path is not easy. Only avery small part of the gospels contains reports of hislife. Nevertheless, let us look at what they say about
his place of birth:• "... Search and see that no prophet arises outof Galilee" (John 7:52).
• "Surely the Christ is not going to come from
Galilee, is He?" (John 7:41).
• "... From the descendants of David, and from
Bethlehem, the village where David was" (John7:41-42).
Here, we have three place names: Galilee,
Bethlehem and the "village where David was." So let
us look at them one by one. Galilee is a region thatderives its name form the Hebrew galil ha-goiim,
meaning land of the goiim, (Goutians, Kuti) that is,heathens, "people who do not revere the god of theJews," “people of other faiths,” who live north of
Judea. These non-Jewish people, of course, do notcall themselves Galileans any more than do
American Natives call themselves Indians. Since
Galilee and Samaria have been inhabited bySumerians for millennia and, for decades prior toJesus' birth, specifically by Parthian-Scythians aswell (See Mary's lineage, below), the Jews call72

Galileans “people of other faiths,” and the churches
these Galileans have built on hilltops "places ofcorruption." These are the churches where Galileanspray to the Mother Goddess referred to in biblicalwritings as Astarte or Asthoret. In their faith,
however, this personage is called Virgin of Light who
stands next to the Father of Light (Bal, Baal) and the
Son of Light, that is, the Light of the World theyknow as Enlil. The teachers of the Galileans' faith
are sages, wise-men and women called magi, or mah
or mag, meaning "of great wisdom" in Sumerian.
Therefore, it is no coincidence that the gospels
reflect the theological perspective of Judaism when
the Jews accuse Jesus of being a magus, aperspective confirmed by Mark:"He is possessed by Beelzebub" (3:22)(Beelzebub,
demon
and
magus
are
represented by the same symbol).
So the place called Galilee is a strong contender
for the birthplace of an individual "of other faiths."
And since Jesus is accused of being such anindividual, Galilee is a strong contender for Jesus'
birthplace as well.
The second place name is Bethlehem. According
to Matthew, Bethlehem is Jesus' birthplace:"Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea" (2:1).
The problem with any "Bethlehem of Judea" isthat it does not exist. Since the time of the biblical73

David, the small community near Jerusalem called
Bethlehem today has always been known as Bethlomon. So why is its name suddenly changed, one
might ask? Once again, cui bono? A logical suspectis the group of Jewish evangelists for whom
associating the name Bethlehem with the City ofDavid is of utmost importance to support theprophecy of their prophet Micah:"Out of thee (City of David) shall he come forth
unto me that is to be ruler in Israel" (5:2).
Renaming Beth-lomon to Beth-lehem would
certainly serve the interests of those who professthat Jesus is the Jews' Messiah, descendant of David.
Of course, today it is common knowledge that the
Jews never acknowledged Jesus as their Messiah(Christos in Greek), since they still yearn for theirtrue messiah, the ruler of the world. And there isanother problem with the very existence of a
"Bethlehem of Judea" in Jesus' time. There is no
trace of such community anywhere in Judea during
the first three centuries AD. So it would seem that
Bethlehem of Judea as Jesus' birthplace is mere
fabrication and its association with "the village
where David was" is attempted reverse engineering
to uphold a prophecy. In other words, it is anattempt to force change on reality to maintain afantasy.
So where was Jesus born? Jesus was, in fact, born74

in Bethlehem. But this Bethlehem is not in Judea: it
is in Galilee, in the land of “people of other faiths."
During the 14th century BC Amarna Alliance, it is
known as Bit-Lahmi (see below, Jesus' faith “Bit-Lami”) located at a distance of about 6 kilometers fromtoday's Nazareth. Next to it is a hill called Tabor(Hungarian, Camp) where a church of the Galileans'faith had been erected, which in 218 BC issurrounded by a wall constructed by Antiochus III.
According to legend, it is from here that Jesus
ascends to Heaven. So Bethlehem of Galilee is also astrong contender for Jesus' birthplace. And whencombined with the likelihood of Galilee, the "land ofpeople of other faiths" of which Jesus is accused, it
becomes difficult to deny that Jesus was born in
Bethlehem, Galilee.

75

76

77

There is ample evidence of map locations ofBethlehem of Galilee: Edward Wells, A New Map of
the Land of Canaan, Sutton Nichols', copper
engraving, London, 1700; Christoph Cellarius,
Palastina Sev Terra Sancta, Lipzig, 1706; andEmanuel Bowen, An Accurate Map of the Holly
Land, copper engraving, London, 1747, all show
Bethlehem at about the same place, in Galilee. By
the 19th century, however, Bethlehem of Galilee
mysteriously vanishes from maps. Also, a map
section taken from the Reformed Church Bible—
depicting biblical 12th century BC Canaan—clearlyshows two Bethlehems: the original town locatedabout 45 Km west of Lake Galilee (top of map), andthe later renamed community south of Jerusalem in
Judea [Undated].
Finally, let us look at the "village where Davidwas" claim. We are fairly certain Jesus was born in
the land of the "people of other faiths," but let us
look for a link to this biblical Hebrew king anyway.
Matthew's gospel (1:16) begins with the listing of
the “clan of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of
Abraham,” but ends not with Jesus but with acertain Joseph whom the scriptures relate to Jesus'
mother, Mary, as her husband. This lineage isfurther confirmed by Luke (2:1-5). But then we
discover (in 1:20) that Mary was conceived not by
Joseph, but by the Holy Spirit. It is self evident that78

the gospels show the lineage of a certain Joseph but
not of Jesus. (Note: This study does not try to
explain Mary's [biological] conception. The intent,
here, is to expose the gospels' logical fallacy.)
Consequently, it is not Jesus but this Joseph who istraced back to David. Further, Jesus finds thesuggestion that he could be the son of David absurdin his reply to the Jews in Matthiew 22:45:"If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can He be
his son?"Further, Jesus makes a point to explicitly distancehimself from the Jews every time he addresses them.
Whenever he speaks to the Jews, he invariably uses
the second person “you,” not “we” or “us,” and“your,” not “our.” "Moses gave you circumcision,"
not "Moses gave us circumcision." Likewise, "You dowhat you do because that is what you saw at yourfathers'," not "We do what we do because that iswhat we saw at our fathers'."
While Judeo-Christianity claims Jesus as the sonof David, the Jews themselves reject such claim. It
should be kept in mind that Jews recognize Jesus asa Galilean foreigner (goiim), not as a Jew. That iswhat they teach in their religious education classes.
In the Talmud, he is depicted quite negatively:"Jesus performed wizardry, led the people ofIsrael astray, and tempted them to sin"
(Sanhedrin 107.b. and Nazir 40.b).
79

Therefore, not only a so-called “village where
David was” cannot be linked to Jesus' birth but, sofar, Jesus has no connection what so ever with any
David, either in the gospels or in Jewish teaching.
Those who claim that Jesus derives from Davidnot biologically but in belief contradict themselves,as well. Here, too, any link between Jesus and Davidcan be dismissed not only because of lack of proof,
but also because of proof to the contrary. Whereas
Jesus teaches and practices courage, kindness,
selflessness and mercy, we find David living byvalues diametrically opposed to those of Jesus. Thissubject is not just a matter of racial classification: it
is a matter of morality, of the determination andpractical application of laws concerning human lifeand codes of conduct based on Man turning toward
God, toward his concept of God for moral guidance.
On the one hand, we have Jesus teaching us of acaring God, a Heavenly Father who loves everyone
alike, and urging us to adopt universal neighborly
love as the basis of all our laws. On the other, is adogma that directly opposes Jesus' teaching. It
promotes its own merciless, vengeful god (Yahweh,
Jehovah), and a selfish ideology founded on the
exclusion and subjugation of all non-Jews from theJewish god's grace by limiting it to a select race,"God's Chosen People." Therefore, it is fair to saythat the glorification of ruthlessness, vengeance and80selfish racism directly opposes even the mostprimitive concepts of neighborly love. It is selfevident that deriving Jesus from David “in belief” isas absurd as considering their immutable, mutually
exclusive beliefs identical. Attempts to derive themoral profile of the kind, benevolent Jesus, son of
the living God, from that of an immoral criminal,
devoid of any characteristics suggestive of even themost basic human decency, is not only absurd but
repugnant even to atheists. The disgust this
proposition arouses is exemplified by Dr. Pál Vágó inhis book, A vérszerződés ereje: (in free translation),
not available in English, but the title translates as
The Power of Blood-alliance.
"I consider it outright sacrilege if someone,
driven by Orthodox prejudice against Jesus,
stubbornly insists on deriving Jesus fromDavid. To derive the embodiment of divine
moral purity from a villainous character, thehallmark of Jewish morality in the Old
Testament, is utterly repugnant."
Bible-lovers cite only the supposed duel between
David and the Philistine Goliath for posterity tomarvel. They are less vocal about biblical accounts
that mercilessly refute his "great heroism":"During his son Absolon's rebellion, David
flees, and delegates the protection of his houseto ten of his concubines" (2 Samuel 15:15-16).
81

He does not directly participate in the battle: heleaves such dangerous jobs for his mercenaries.
However, when he gets wind of the fall of Rabbah,
he reappears, and sets out to slaughter the
inhabitantsoftheconqueredcitieswith
unprecedented cruelty:"And he brought forth the people that were
therein, and put them under saws, and under
harrows of iron, and under axes of iron, andmade them pass through the brick-kiln: andthus did he unto all the cities of the children ofAmmon (2 Samuel 12:31).
The above is the first mention in the history ofhumanity of the use of ovens to exterminate entire
populations. But this is not the end of David's
biblical character portray. He has his bravest
lieutenant, the Hittite Uriah deviously beaten to
death. David bribes the soldiers assigned to protect
Uriah to abandon him during the battle. That is his
way to get his hands on Uriah's beautiful wife, thebathing Bathsheba, whom he has been stalking fromhis roof-top (2 Samuel 11). He also has his
mercenaries rob his subordinates (1 Samuel 27:10);
and Nabal suddenly dies when David sets his eyeson Nabal's wife, Abigail (1 Samuel 25:38-39). He
then has his henchmen assassinate Izrael's lawful
heir, Esh-Baal (Izbozeth, Ishbosheth) and, to coverup his deed, has his henchmen executed as well (The82

name, Izrael, here, refers to the Caucasian “Iz-ra-el”
people who worship the despised [by the Jews] Baal,and not to Semites or Hebrews. Jews appropriate
this name only later when they retroactively
fabricate their pre-Judaism history [Jeremiah's
Judaism is conceived in 6th century BC Babylon, 400
years after this assassination, and first set in writing
as the Talmud nearly a thousand years after that).
Enjoying the hijacked absolute power, he has Saul'sentire extended family massacred. Such is thecharacter of David, culture-hero of Judaism, modelof Jewish morality—according to Jewish teachings.
In summary, attempts to derive Jesus from David
defy reason and logic:• Bethlehem of Judea, City of David, does notexist;• Bethlehem of Galilee exists, but no Jews live in
Galilee;• Galilee and Samaria are the "land of nonJewish people;"• David's lineage stops with Joseph and nobiological link exists between Joseph andJesus;• The Jews accuse Jesus of being a “demonpossessed” Samaritan magus;• The Jews, themselves reject such lineage;• Jesus, himself finds such lineage absurd;
Beyond any biological link, deriving Jesus from83

David on grounds of belief are equally absurd
because the two characters reflect immutable andmutually exclusive beliefs.
The last possible chance to link Jesus to David
would be to show Mary's bloodline leading back toDavid.
However,
even
the
most
fanatical"researchers" cannot derive Mary from David.
Therefore, it is safe to conclude that Jesus is not
related to David biologically, racially, culturally, infaith, or in matters of personal values, but can betied to a non-Jewish people, a “people of otherfaiths.”84

"Christ" born in a cave, a stable, or ...?
Findings during the search for the precise
location of Jesus' birthplace further undercut any
argumentfor
hisSemitic-Hebrew-Jewish
background, and open up an entirely new set ofleads.
The Biblical Dictionary says: "We do not know
when and where Jesus was born." In the four
canonized gospels, Luke, Saul's secretary andassociate, is the only one who, in accordance with
the Messaic ideology and the effort to force Jesus'
Jewish lineage, says that Mary gave birth in a stable:"...Also went up from Galilee, out of the city ofNazareth, into Judea, unto the city of David,
which is called Bethlehem; (because he was of
the house and lineage of David:)... To be taxedwith Mary his espoused wife, being great withchild. And so it was, that, while they were
there, the days were accomplished that sheshould be delivered. And she brought forth her
firstborn son, and wrapped him in swaddlingclothes, and laid him in a manger; because
there was no room for them in the inn" (Luke
2:4, 7).
Other than the bracketed insertion referring toDavid's lineage and the non-existent “city of David,
which is called Bethlehem,” there are other serious
85

problems with Luke's story, beginning with Jesus'
parents' supposed travel from (today's) Nazareth tothe "city of David which is called Bethlehem." First,
nowhere can we find a city called Nazareth aroundthe time of Jesus' birth (believed to be August 11th,
6 BC). Second, pragmatic history reveals that such a
trip would fail even today if it were attempted in themanner described by Luke. Today's Nazareth ismore than 140 kilometers form Jerusalem in astraight line. Considering the terrain, the distanceby road could have been double that. And the village
of Beth-Lomon, (renamed Bethlehem centuries
later), the so-called City of David was even farther.
Therefore, Mary would have had to travel some 2300 kilometers riding on a burrow (as traditionally
depicted), or via any other existing mode oftransportation, in her state of advanced pregnancy.
Considering the estimated speed of a burrow, oreven that of a caravan over long distances, the trip
would have taken her weeks to complete—if shewere to survive at all in her condition and not
miscarry. And, of course, she would have had to pay
for food and accommodation for herself, Joseph and,possibly, the animals every night, all out of acarpenter's wages. And then there is the taxation
absurdity: Judea, Samaria and Galilee are three,separate jurisdictions. So even if taxation ofindividuals were in effect—and there is no evidence86that it was—the idea of a resident being taxed in adifferent jurisdiction 2-300 kilometers away is plain
absurd. All in all, Luke's fantastic story is not evenplausible.
Another evangelist, Matthew, briefly references
or suggest Jesus' birthplace:"Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of
Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold,there came wise men from the East to
Jerusalem" (2:1). [No records exist of the magi
calling on Herod, in Jerusalem or anywhere
else, nor is there any mention of such records.]
Mark calls Nazareth Jesus' hometown (6:1); andJohn suggests that Jesus is from Galilee (47:41).
Since today's Nazareth is in Galilee, we can inferfrom the canonized gospels that Mary's residence isin Galilee. (A look ahead: The name Jesus ofNazareth is but a fabrication because no such town
existed [See below]. The Jews had no idea who Jesus
was, so they could not call him by name. All theyknew was that he was from Galilee. So whenever hehealed the sick or performed other miracles, theJews called out, “nazarit,” meaning holy man. Since
this was a term the rabbis and Jewish priest-princes
demanded exclusively for themselves, they were
infuriated when their own people called the man thehigh-priests of the Temple of Jerusalem had declareda demon a “Holy Man.”)87

The traditional Christian belief is that Jesus wasborn in a cave or a stable with animals breathing on
him to keep him warm, where the magi came to visit
him. In our search for the origin of the "born in acave or stable" belief, we can find no such reference
until the time of Justin in the second half of thesecond century. What we do find is that Constantin's
mother, Helena, reveres and prays to the GreekRoman god Chrestos, (Osiris, the Egyptian sundeity), a word for “good.” Once Constantine stops
persecuting worshipers of Chrestos, he orders thatthe until now ridiculed sun-deity is to be worshipedas the Son of God, and that a day in his honor, “SunDay,” be the day of rest (321 AD). That is when his
mother hastily goes to the "Holy Land" to look for acave in the small town the Jews point out to her as
the City of David, and decrees it to be Chrestos'birthplace. She finds a convenient cave andimmediately has a church built on top of it. It is thisnoble gesture on her part that starts the official
worship of the Egyptian sun-deity, Chrestos informer Judea. Little does she know that in less than
100 years, the Saul-Paulists will hijack her sun-god
and appropriate his name, reintroducing it in Romeas Christos (note the spelling), the Greek translationof the Jews' word for Messiah (anointed one) (Note:
The Hungarian word for Christian does not derivefrom the word Christ: It derives from the cross88within a circle, known as the Hun Cross, “Avar”
Cross and Celtic Cross, symbolizing the sun. JudeoChristianity appropriates the cross symbol in the 34th century AD and also nails Jesus onto it—thecrucifix—as a subliminal warning to opponents ofJewish authority.)
Now that we know when, how, and by whom thestable or cave idea was conceived—as well as theorigin of the name Christ (Christos)—let us see what
others say about the site of Jesus' birth. The
Jerusalem Talmud says: "Jesus was born in the Royal
Palace of Bethlehem" (Ber. ii 5). (Note: There is no
trace or mention of any royal palace in Beth-lomon[later renamed Bethlehem], Judea, during Jesus'
time. Therefore, the Talmud must be referring toanother Bethlehem.) And if we start looking in the
direction of a royal palace, then we can put to rest
any myth of Jesus being born in a cave or stable.
The idea of a palace as Jesus' birthplace opens up
a whole new perspective into the lineage of the Sonof God. And in this perspective, the luxurious
glassware depicted on the table in Leonardo
daVinci's painting, The Last Supper, begins to makesense. And there is more, much more. Christians
who find it difficult to consider Jesus as royalty,rather than the son of a Jewish carpenter, mightwant to heed Jesus' encouragement: "Seek and you
shall find me;" "Search the Scriptures!" and "The89

Truth will set you free." So, in that spirit, let us seek
and search for the historical “Prince of Bethlehem.“90

Historical overview
History provides ample documentation toformulate the assumption that Mary is of ParthianScythian descent. Consequently, her son's biologicalaspect also points to the teaching of a faith andreligious morality directly opposed to Jewish
ideology. That opposition was apparently felt andresented by the Jews, as Josephus writes:"The Jews always hated the Galileans."
It is impossible to write the history of early
Christianity without a thorough understanding of
the political and spiritual makeup and influence of
an oft-hidden world power, the Parthian Empire. For
five centuries, from 256 BC until 226 AD, theParthian Empire, or more precisely, Parthian
Monarchy, encompasses the territories of Iraq, Iranand beyond and, at times, Syria and Palestine. It isin this land that Jesus' disciples, the later apostles,
teach Jesus' verb. It is evident that JudeoChristianity's deliberate omission of the apostles'
activities in Parthia, as well as its silence on thedetails of their works and the contents of theirwritings are of enormous importance to the interestsof Judeo-Christianity's church politics.
The customary reference to the Parthians is theParthian Empire. However, empire in this case is amisnomer. To be precise, it is a monarchy. The
91

Arsacid Dynasty unites and rules all the feudal
principalities and kingdoms of the Parthians'
territories, similar to the centralization of power (towhich they gave the title, [in free translation] the"lords of the four parts of the world") theirpredecessors, the Sumerians achieved with theaccord of their city-states. One of these is theprincipality of Persia (the later Sassanids). Anotheris the Kingdom of Adiabene. However, all of theseprincipalities and kingdoms are under the authorityof the four kings of the Arsacid Dynasty who reign
as monarchs over Armenia, Parthia, Indo-Parthia
and Habdal-Hunnia (White Huns), in the CaspianAral-Oxus region. Due to the sheer size of their land,
theirpolitical
andmilitary
strength,thecommonality of their race, language and religious
beliefs, the Parthians are known as one of the three,distinct peoples of the time: Senecce Lucious
Anneus (3-65 A.D.) writes:"The gene pools of Mankind are the Greek, theRoman, and the Parthian."West of the Parthian Empire is a much more
publicized world power opposing Parthia, the Roman
Empire. Here, relative ranking of contestants for
power is set according to acquisition of new
territory.
Consequently,
theRomansadopt
expansionist policies. With the emergence andpolicies of this new world power, wars are frequent92

in Canaan, too, including wars among the Jewish
tribes that resettle Southern Canaan after theirrelease from Babylon, a region the Romans call
Iudaea Province.

Map of "Parthian Sub-Kingdoms" in 14 A.D.
according to current information propagation.
Understanding early Christianity also demands atleast a quick review of the history of the region
where Jesus is born. After the flood (around 5500
BC), Ut-nap-ishtim, popularly known as Noah,
emerges in the region of the Ararat Mountains (Most
scholars agree that the biblical flood is a rework of93

parts of the 3rd millennium BC Sumerian classic,
Epic of Gilgamesh [Nib-Ur, biblical Nimrod], inwhich the Ararat Mountains is called Mount Nisir.
“Gilgamesh is in reality Nimrod,” according to
George Smith, Assyrian Discoveries, 1875, London).
Ut-nap-ishtim's son, Canaan, along with his
Sumerian people, settles on the eastern shores ofthe Mediterranean, a region later renamed in partas (variably) Lebanon, Phoenicia, Syria, Jordan,
Palestine, Galilee, Samaria, Judea, and, later (1948),
Israel. Here the Canaanites live peacefully according
to their laws and religious beliefs; develop
agriculture, fisheries and trade with their kindred in
Egypt and Mesopotamia; and gradually improvetheir standard of living during the next 4000 years,
suffering only relatively minor civic disturbances.
Then, an alien, Semitic people (led by Moses,
according to the Talmud) of unknown origin(possibly Arabia), ousted from Egypt by the ruler ofthe 18-19th Dynasty (14-13th century BC),
supposedly sets out to massacre the populations of
the Canaanite cities in a historically unprecedented
wave of genocide, claiming that their god told themto do so when he gave(!) them Canaan:"When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into
the land whither thou goest to possess it, andhath cast out many nations before thee, theHittites, and the Girgashites, and the94

Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the
Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites,
seven nations greater and mightier than thou;
And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them
before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly
destroy them; thou shalt make no covenantwith them, nor shew mercy unto them"(Deuteronomy 7:1-2).
The Canaanites (biblical Gog and Magog) halt the
Hebrew invasion south of Sidon and gradually push
the invaders back. The Bible gives an account of acertain David who is said to have committed suchatrocities as the extermination of the inhabitants ofentire cities, doings which turned him into the later
Jews' biblical hero. It also gives an account of the
Hebrews (who now call themselves Israel) carving
up Canaan between a so-called “Twelve Tribes ofIsrael.” David's son, Salomon, becomes the king of
the 12 tribes. After his death, the Kingdom of Israel
splits into two; the 10 northern tribes constituting
Israel, and the 2 southern tribes, Judea. However,these accounts appear to be, at best, historicalfabrications written up retroactively, since noevidence of such kingdoms exist (Yigael Shiloh[Hebrew University]). Even during the so-called
King Solomon's time, the region later called Galilee
and Samaria separates the two supposed kingdoms,
suggesting that the invading Hebrews failed to95realize their plan, if any. In the 8th century BC,
Sargon II occupies Samaria and deports the isolatedHebrew clans from Samaria and Galilee to the
Habur river region in Media, and replaces them withpeople from Kuta (Kuti people, the Talmud calls
them Samaritans) and other Mesopotamian cities.
The ten so-called “Northern Tribes” disappear frombiblical history, while the two “Southern Tribes”
squat on the hill country of Southern Canaan (later
Judea) as, according to Yigael Shiloh, “wondering
pastoralists.”
In the 6th century BC, Nebuchadnezzar deports
the Hebrews from Canaan to Babylon, Mesopotamia(biblical
Babylonian
Exile).
The
Babylonian
Scythians welcome the deportees and allow them
freedom to practice any religion they choose. It is
here, in peaceful existence provided by abenevolent, affluent society and relative autonomy
that the Hebrews conceive a new religious
dictatorship, Judaism, which they retroactively write
up nearly a thousand years later (200-500 AD) as the
Talmud. Later, they will use their Babylonian powerbase to plot the overthrow of their benefactors. Afterthe fall of Babylon in 537 BC, Cyrus allows the Jews
to return to Southern Canaan—and many of themdo.
By the Maccabean Period (2nd century BC), only
a few isolated Jewish families live in Galilee. The last96

of the Jews leave Galilee when the Maccabean
Simon Tharsi, after his victory over the Assyrians,
gathers the remaining isolated Jewish families and,for security reasons, ships them back to Judea.
Then, in 129 BC, the first autonomous Jewish
state (140-76 BC), the later Judea, occupies Samariaand, in 104 BC, Galilee as well. Aristobulus, king of
Judea reigns for a year (104-103 BC) to be replacedby his half-brother, Alexander Jannaeus (103-76 BC).
It is during this period that Janneus “experiments”
with the Judaization of the conquered territories. He
forces Judaism on the population, including thehorrors of forced mutilation of all captured males,
young and old, in the conquered territories.
In 63-64 BC, most of Canaan falls under Roman
control, though the Jewish government enjoys a highdegree of autonomy in Judea under the Romans.
Soon after (60 BC), the first (Roman) triumvirate isformed by Caesar, Pompeius and Crassus. Seeking
to outdo Caesar, Crassus, attacks the Parthians, but
a Parthian scout force intercepts the Romans androuts their 30,000-strong army at Carrhae (Harran)in 53 BC. Crassus himself is killed. The region westof the Euphrates, including Northern Canaan(Galilee, Samaria and parts of Judea), fall under
Parthian control, and become provinces of the
Adiabene Kingdom, named after the Parthian royal
prince appointed to govern it, Nakeb Adiabene (His97

title as governor was Pa-Kur [lord of the mountainregion], referenced in biblical writings as Pacorus).
The inhabitants are freed from the yoke of Judaism,
lament their mutilated sons, and resume practicing
their ancient faith openly.

Map of Parthian forces liberating Northern Canaan
after defeating the Romans.
In 42 BC, Parthian King Bazapran, visits
Adiabene province to join in the festivities planned
for the wedding anniversary of its governor, Parthian
Prince Nakeb Adiabene and his wife, Parthian
Princess Grapte Kharax (also spelled, Charax)—98whose name appears as the name of a city (andprovince) just south of Ur, Mesopotamia. At thesame time, he reinforces Antigonus (Mathatias) of
the Hasmoneus Dynasty, who becomes king of
Jerusalem; and gives the Jews religious freedom.
The rulers of the Parthian Empire are supporting thelast descendants of the Maccabees, (the Hasmonean
Dynasty) against Herod, whose oppressive policies
they find so repulsive, they capture and imprison
Herod's brother, Phasael, while Herod himself flees
to Rome to avoid capture.
In response, Rome appoints Herod king of
Jerusalem, and Roman legions land on the shores ofSamaria, at Joppa to put Herod in power. Mark
Anthony commands the legions, but Parthian forces
repeatedly repel the Romans. However, two years
later, Herod captures Jerusalem from the south via
Idumea (Edom) in a bloodbath, killing large numbersof Sadducees. He also tries to force his way into
Galilee, but runs into armed opposition as soon as
he reaches Samaria and must sue for a peace treaty
by way of the Parthian governor, Prince Adiabene.
This is the political situation in the region
preceding Mary's birth. The Parthian Empire is at its
peak: Its territories are no longer confined to thearea that spans between the Euphrates and theIndus rivers, but include Galilee and Samaria where
Prince Adiabene is governor. In light of these99

historical events, it is unreasonable to think of any
Jewish population in Galilee until after the fall of theJewish state and Jerusalem (2nd century AD). While
it is plausible that a few Semites (Hebrews, Jews)
had survived deportations, resettlement andevacuation, Galilee and Samaria are inhabited by ahomogeneous Scythian (See below) population.

100Mary's lineage
Referring to historical documents, we can sortout the confusion and deliberate disinformation
about the Parthians in general and the identities andlives of Prince Adiabene and Princess Kharax inparticular. German research concluded that themarriage of Prince Nakeb Adiabene and his wife
Princess Grapte Kharax was at first childless. A
Jewish merchant named Ananias, from whom thecouple had bought much jewelry—among otherwares—convinced the royal couple to convert to
Judaism, and to pray to the god of the Jews (Yahweh,
Jehovah), “who will surely bless them with anoffspring.” The persuasion was successful, andPrince Adiabene is given the name Joachim in the
Jewish religion, and his wife becomes Anna (names
to note). The Jewish "archaeologist" Josephus
Flavius writes: "the Adiabenes erected a palace inJerusalem, and contributed a third of their annual
income to the Temple of Jerusalem, and distributed
another third among the poor of the Jewry."
However, even after twenty years of waiting,conversion to Judaism proved to be fruitless: thecouple remained childless.
At this point, the high-priests of the Temple ofJerusalem try to persuade Prince Adiabene—known
to the Jews only as Joachim—to divorce his wife and101take on a Jewish woman who will surely bear him achild. Prince Adiabene, however, loved his wife. The
royal couple finds the Jews' suggestion so
repugnant, they break all ties with Judaism andreturn to their original faith. Prince Adiabene
entrusts his wife to his nephew, Useph (Joseph)
Adiabene. (Useph lives and functions near Lake
Galilee. His functions include the management andoversight of natural resources such as fisheries andforestry, so his title, Pandar [overseer] is appended
to his name. He becomes known as Useph Pandar[Hungarian, pandúr: “guardian of property,” before
the establishment of the Royal Hungarian Mounted
Police]). Meanwhile, Prince Adiabene travels to
Sippar, Mesopotamia, to look up the head of themagi, one of his teachers whom he had known sincechildhood. He confesses that he had prayed to theJewish Jehovah for nearly twenty years, and had
generously participated in every religious sacrifice.
But despite his efforts, God had not given him achild. Then:"The Head-magus replied: 'God glorified in
Eternal Light will never do for us what we cando for ourselves, or what others can do for us.
He gave us strength, ability and wisdom so wemay become His allies in the maintenance of
the Order of Creation, and to advocate andpractice His glorification by way of the Light of102Knowledge. Your wife, Princess Grapte's family
has enjoyed physical and intellectual healththroughout generations. Take her to themagus-woman midwife Ywissa, our best
physician for helping childless women, and you
will see that your wife, Princess Grapte, will
give birth, since she is still of childbearingage.'
Prince Adiabene then replied:'You are my father's good friend. I will accept
your advice and promise, that if our God
blesses us with a child, boy or girl, I will placehim or her in His service.' And he took his wifeto the midwife Ywissa. And all happened justas the Head-magus of Sippar said. One year
later, Princess Grapte gave birth to theirdaughter, Mary-Miriam." (The above are from
Wehrli-Frey's book, Jesat Nassar genennt
Jesus Christus, Drei Eichen Verlag, München,
1965.)
And this little girl, as we shall see, is far morethan just the long-awaited child of a royal couple,
promised to be raised in God's service. This German
writer, however, is trying to derive Mary and Jesus
from Aryan ancestry by relying on historical fallacy.
He claims that Parthia was a province of Alexandre's
empire around 350 BC, and therefore, the Parthians
were Aryans. However, he neglects to take into103

account Sebeos' historical findings—History of
Heraclius, Page 10. 1850, Constantinople—whichstate: "In the fourteenth year of Antiochus' regime,
the Parthians shook off the Macedonian yoke, andthe son of the Euthalite (White Huns, also
Hephthalites, Hunas) king became their ruler towhom all peoples of East and North Asia soon paid
homage." Therefore, at the time of Mary's birth, it is
the Parthians who are identified by history as Dahae,
Sakas, Massagetae, Sarmatian, Scythian, and Hun.
They express their collective spirituality according
to the teachings of the so-called Magus Faith or,another frequently (mis)used name for theirreligious observances, Zoroastrianism (Reverence ofLight)—the two are not the same. They build theirchurches on mountain tops, hills and high grounds,
where people gather and direct their supplications
to the Virgin of Light (Inanna, Istar, Astare, Astoret,
Anahita), and to the Son of Light (Bal, Mitra). So thecreed of the original people of Adiabene's province—
called Galilee—and the faith and religious
convictions of the Parthian "Magi who came fromthe East" is one and the same, and excludes allideologies of Judaism.
We also have information on the Adiabene family
from Jewish sources. One of Judaism's literary
products desecrating Mary and Jesus appeared
during the post-Talmud era titled, Toledot Jesu (also104Toledot Yeshu). In this writing, the Jewish author
references a high-ranking personage of Adiabene's
royal family as "Jesus' relative, who wanted to save
him from crucifixion."
Prince Adiabene and Princess Kharax do not live
to see their daughter, Mary reach adulthood. History
has yet to reveal the circumstances of their death,but we know there is no love lost between the royal
couple and Herod, and legends suggest that the
Galilean governor, known as Pacorus is in Herod's
way. Therefore, it is quite possible (though it
remains to be proven—or refuted) that Herod has
the royal couple assassinated. Whatever thecircumstances of their deaths, Princess Mary
Adiabene-Kharax inherits her parents considerable
estate, including their royal palace in Jerusalem
where she resides form time to time to look after her
estate in and around Jerusalem. It is during one ofthese stays that the Jews try to put their hands on
her wealth by way of a crafty maneuver.
To understand the following events, it isnecessary to keep three relevant details in mind:
1. The royal couple, Prince Adiabene and his
wife, Princess Kharax, are known among theJews as Joachim and Anna, the names they
were given at the time they temporarily took
on Judaism in the hope that the Jewish god will
give them an offspring. Therefore, the names
105Joachim and Anna in Jewish scriptures refer to
Prince Adiabene and Princess Kharax.
2. Mary, an adolescent royal orphan known to theJews as Miriam, and Herod's wife (who had
converted to the Jewish faith along with
Mary's parents) are on friendly terms and seeeach other regularly. It is during one of thesesocial encounters (presumed to be at Mary's
royal palace in Jerusalem—based on the dialog
that follows) that the attempt on Mary takes
place.
3. Joseph Pandar is Useph Adiabene.
The "Jewish Legend" relates this attempt. In theGospel of Pseudo-Mathew, we read Abiatar, theJewish high-priest asking the temple council todeliver Miriam (the Jews' name for Mary), daughterof Joachim and Anna, to Rabbi Seth because his son
wants to marry her. Quoting further from this text,
the following scam attempt emerges:"The wife of Rabbi Seth seeks and is granted
an audience with Miriam-Mary, where shesays:'Everyone knows of your goodwill, dear
Miriam. We know that you help
everyone. My son would like to ask of
you a great assistance but, since he is
not good in the use of words, he put his
request in 'writing' and would like to106

give that writing to you."'Well then, let him give it to me,' says
Mary.
Just as the rabbi's son is ready to hand thewritten "request" to Mary, two witnesses frombehind him step forward to 'witness the event.'
Mary reaches for the document, when Herod's
wife, Mariamne, grabs Mary's hand and says
to her:'Do not touch it, Mary, because thesepeople are cheaters. That is not a'request,' but a marriage contract. Once
you touch it, you will never be able tofree yourself from its binding power, andYohanan will be in control of yourwealth.'Mary clasped her hands over her heart, andspoke out angrily to the rabbi's family and thetwo unknowns regarding the audacity of their
trickery:'Have you come here to entrap me in the
web of your deceit and to maliciously
ruin me with your deceitful words by
exploiting my generosity? ...Leave at
once. I never want to see you again.'
By the time Mary spoke these words, Joseph
Pandar already stood beside her, and evicted
the repugnant delegation.
107

Rabbi Seth then ran to Queen Helena anddemanded the registration of his son's"Mekadesh marriage" claiming that Miriam
took into her hand the written contract in thepresence of two witnesses. Queen Helena thenordered him to 'bring forth the two witnesses.'
However, despite a frantic search by thepriests of the Temple of Jerusalem to locate
the witnesses, they were nowhere to be found.
And so Queen Helena, Herod's wife,
Mariamne, Salome and Tryve met, andunanimously agreed that Mary will be underconstant threat of such trickery whenever she
is in Jewish-controlled territory, and that it
would be wise for her to choose a protector for
herself to preempt similar attempts.
Fortunately, Joseph Pandar was also present
during this meeting, and since Mary did notwant to even hear of anyone "marrying her
off," he suggested that he will seek protection
for Mary from the Parthian ruler. Thissuggestion scared Queen Helena, and she
suggested that they bring into the discussion
Mary's mentor since childhood, a woman
everyone called simply Hanna the women108

prophet, and seek her advice in stead.
Mary and Hanna excused themselves todiscuss the situation. At the end of their
discussion, Hanna said:'Come daughter of God. Let us doeverything we need to do to accomplish
God's will.'...without further discussion of the matter,
Mary stepped forward and, with solemn
resolve, announced her decision in total
spiritual accord with her mentor:'The child chosen by the Great Almighty
thanks you for your advice, and will
choose a protector for herself herewith.'
A great silence came over the gathering, andMariamne's two sons, the two Herod princes,
tip-toed into the hall. Then Mary said:'My dear relatives and faithful friends
who wish my welfare: Accept mydecision with kindness and benevolence
when, here, in your presence, I announce
that I Mary, known here as the daughterof Joachim and Anna, in the name of the
Almighty God, hereby choose and ask myblood-relative Useph Pandar to be myguardian and to protect me from all mypotential enemies. In your presence, I
109

give him my hand as a sign of my respect
and authority.'
She, then extended her hand to Joseph Pandar.
Joseph Pandar broke the silence by stepping
up to Mary, knelt in front of her, took her hand,kissed it, and put it on his head saying:'Dear Mary, I am not worthy of suchgreat honor. But I consider and accept
your decision as a divine calling for me
to be your faithful servant and guardian
for as long as I live. May our Almighty
God help us make it so... In the province
where I am the Pandar, I can surely
guarantee Mary's safety and welfare.
But, here, in Jerusalem, though we areforeigners, we are subjected to the lawsof the Temple of Jerusalem. I want toprevent any more surprise attempts on
Mary such as that perpetrated by thewife of Rabbi Seth on her son's behalf.
Therefore, I want to execute the same
"Mekadesh marriage" contract Rabbi
Seth's son wanted to fraudulently
accomplish, and to ask King Herod's[adopted] sons, here present, to witness
this deed.''Mary: Herewith I extend to you the110

contract, by which I officially take you as
my wife according to local laws, the lawsof the Temple of Jerusalem. Take into
your hand the document of this deed.'...then, later:'Rabbi Simon: I ask you, as the prince ofthe synagogue, to record, by your own
hand, this marriage into your temple's
registry.'"
Later, Herod has his wife and her two sonsexecuted—though his reasons are subjects ofdebates.
In light of Wehrli-Frey's research, where Joachim
and Anna are in fact Prince Adiabene and Princess
Kharax, the above sequence of events becomes
clear:
1. Mary is the orphan teen-age daughter ofPrince Adiabene and Princess Kharax;
2. Mary has substantial property in Jerusalem,
which includes her royal palace;
3. Mary's husband by local civilian law is Useph(Joseph) Pandar Adiabene;
4. Useph Adiabene wants the Parthian ruler toprotect Mary from the Jews;
5. Useph Adiabene is concerned that he canprotect Mary only in his jurisdiction, Adiabene(Galilee),
but
not
in
Jewish-controlled
Jerusalem.
111However, we do not find any reference to any
carpenter named Joseph as Mary's husband. As thematter of fact, we cannot find any trace of acarpenter named Joseph anywhere in history. Evenin the Bible, all we have are brief references to acertain Joseph by the evangelists Matthew andMark, neither of whom ever met either Jesus, Mary,
Useph Pandar or the elusive carpenter, Joseph.
Considering that Christians believe this carpenter tobe Mary's husband and Jesus' provider, the gospels
do not say much about him or his background. What
we do find, is an interesting link between the words“carpenter” and “Nazareth,” a link we must digressfor a moment to explore.
The respected British researcher, M.F. Albright,
has determined that, in Jesus' time, the place theBible calls Nazareth is in fact a community called
Magharet, located a mere 5 kilometers from Mount
Tabor, and that it became Nazareth only through“biblical creativity.” This is where Useph Adiabenefunctions in his capacity as overseer, of which theJews are aware. We also know that, according toJosephus, "the Jews always hated the Galileans," andthat they ridiculed everyone and everything that was
not Jewish. One example of such ridicule is the word
Galilee, a disparaging word for galil ha-goiim,(Goutim, Kuti, Scythians) heathens, mentioned
earlier. Another is the person and the title of Useph112

Pandar. Since his function in the town of Magharetincluded the management of forestry and forest
products, the Jews nicknamed him "Magharetnaggar," meaning "carpenter of Magharet." That theword naggar means carpenter and is disparaging is
confirmed in the Talmud:"...during the argument concerning thismatter, Rabbis Jirmeja and Seseth say: 'I amneither a naggar nor the son of a naggar, but I
will explain this matter, ...this word, naggar,
originally means carpenter'" (50.b).
That is how Prince Useph (Joseph) Pandar of the
Adiabene royal family becomes Christianity's"Joseph the carpenter" and Magharet becomes thebiblical Nazareth.
And so we find the sources of both the "Joseph
the carpenter" and the non-existent town ofNazareth inventions mentioned in the Bible. We alsofind vast amounts of text ridiculing the Adiabene
royal family. That alone, the tremendous effort put
forth to ridicule the Adiabenes, suggests that
discrediting this royal family must be very important
to Jews and Judeo-Christianity.
But let us get back to Mary. After the registrationof Mary's marriage to Useph Adiabene, Mary andher entourage return home to their palace in
Scythopolis (See below). Mary and Hanna are toremain here, while Useph prepares to resume his113work. But a great surprise and gathering awaits
Mary. A high-ranking visitor had already arrived andis looking for her:
"Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel wassent from God to a city in Galilee called
Nazareth; to a virgin engaged to a man whosename was Joseph, of the descendants of David;
and the virgin's name was Mary" (Luke 1:2627).
Overlooking for the moment the alreadydiscussed “Nazareth” and “descendant of David”
fabrications, let us see what we can find out about
this “angel Gabriel” Luke is referring to. In
cuneiform writing GAB-RI-EL is a compound word
which means "Derived from God's breast" (GAB,
breast; RI, of, from; EL, God). Gabriel is a wellknown name in Magi tradition. It is the name of theArchmagus based at magi headquarters in Sippar,on the bank of the Euphrates river of the ParthianEmpire. Therefore, it is very likely that this Gabrieltravels from Sippar to Scythopolis (Bethshaan) since
his position in Sippar permits travel only inextraordinary circumstances. And it seems quite
appropriate to call this distinguished white-haired
gentleman God's earthly messenger (angel), if we
like.
Gabriel's words and manner of approach to Mary
have been preserved in traditions:114

"This is the happiest journey of my life, Mary;
that I may come to you and bring you theDivine Message I was entrusted to deliver, thesecret of secrets. Our Mighty God has shownme this in the Book of Heavens. At the place
where your stars are, the Book speaks of yourcalling, of your purpose, because the crest of
the New Moon shines beneath the feet of theMorning Star, and the planet of truth is theircrown. You are the Virgin Morning Star landed
on Earth. The Son of God who brings the New
Light, whose mother you will be, is conceived
in your womb. Sense within your spirit the willof our God, because, within you comes to life
the Son of God, in accordance with the laws ofearthly incarnation. But he will come into theworld from your womb by miracle, as thefulfillment of God's promise that he will beborn of a virgin mother, just as it had been
since eternity. On the day of his birth, thePanther Star from beyond the world will alsoarrive to augment the light of the earthly
planets, lighting up the heavens to a level
never before seen and thereby signal thearrival of the Son of God on Earth."
Although the above is but a tradition, the words
quoted remain to this day as symbols on icons andpaintings. The Virgin Mary is most often shown115

standing above the crest of the New-Moon. It is tonote that Mary is called the Morning Star, a name
Jesus also uses to refer to himself.

116

Mary's faith
It is common knowledge that different faiths havedifferent expectations of their gods. Jews hanker fora political ruler from Heaven and, since theirreligion acknowledges only a male god—as a matterof fact, the Hebrew language does not even have aterm for a female deity—such personage would haveto be male. By contrast, Sumerian-Scythians believe
in a Virgin Mother, or Queen of Heaven. JudeoChristianity fallows Jewish male chauvinism by
excluding female deities, though it acknowledges
Jesus' mother, Mary, in a lesser role. However, in an
attempt to derive Jesus from the Jews, it tries toforce a Jewish ancestry onto Mary. Any questions
about her lineage is settled simply by a priestly
dictum: "Mary was a Jew.” Period. So let us research
Church documents regarding this dictum.
We find Jerome's (died 420 AD) letter addressed
to Heliodorus and in it, those items he calls Book
about the birth of Mary, one of the Apocryphal
Gospels. In Chapter I he states: "Mary was born inthe city of Nazareth, and educated in the temple of
the Lord. Her father's name was Joachim, and hermother's, Anna. The family of her father was ofGalilee and the city of Nazareth. The family of her
mother was of Bethlehem." So, here we find that
Mary's father is a Galilean, and her mother is from117

Bethlehem. Since by now, we know that Bethlehemis in Galilee, she too is a Galilean. Therefore, both of
Mary's parents live in the land of "people of otherfaiths," and Mary was most likely born here.
Then, in Chapter IV, we read:“And when the three years were expired andthe time of her weaning complete, theybrought the Virgin to the temple of the Lordwith their offerings. And there were about the
temple, according to the fifteen Psalms ofdegrees, fifteen stairs to ascend. For thetemple was built on a mountain, and the altarof burnt-offering outside and could not become near but by stairs..."Here, the information of special interest is "temple
was built on a mountain." Let us see what the Bible
says about temples built on mountains, the biblical"high places":• "...drive out all the inhabitants of the land frombefore you, and destroy all their figured
stones, and destroy all their molten images
and demolish all their high places" (Numbers
33:52).
• "Behold, I Myself am going to bring a sword onyou, and I will destroy your high places. So
your altars will become desolate and your Sunpillars will be smashed; and I will make yourslain fall in front of your idols" (Ezeikel 6:3-4).
118

• "Destroyed the altars of foreign gods and highplaces, tore down the sacred idols, cut down
the Asherim" (2 Chronicles 14:3).
And so we could continue with other examples
and conclude that temples and sanctuaries built onmountains, "high places" are not the churches of the
Jews' god, but belong to "people of other faiths." We
can say with certainty that the churches the Jews
want to demolish are the churches of non-Jews.
Consequently, if Mary is taken to such a church, shecannot have been “educated in the temple” of the
Jews' god. Further, because of their low status in
Jewish society, Jewish females are only permitted to
set foot in atria; and there is not a single Jewish
sanctuary, church or religious institution, inJerusalem or anywhere else, where Jewish femalesof any age are educated. Therefore, Mary could havebeen raised only in an institution other than Jewish.
This conclusion also suggests that Mary's parentsare "people of other faiths."
And there are other serious problems with
Jerome's priestly dictum. Nowhere can we find asynagogue or, for that matter, any Jewish
establishment in any "Nazareth." As the mater offact, nowhere can we find a place called Nazarethanywhere before the 3rd century AD (Americanarchaeologist,
James
Strange).
The
Jewish"historian," Josephus Flavius, does not mention any
119Nazareth among the 45 Jewish settlements andcongregations; nor is it mentioned in the Old
Testament, the Apocrypha or any early rabbinic
literature. It is not included in the list of twelve
towns and six villages, the tribal settlements of
Zebulun (Joshua 19:10-16); and it is not among the
63 towns of Galilee mentioned in the Talmud. In
light of this reality, we can be certain there areneither Jewish religious life nor Jewish churches in a
non-existent “city of Nazareth” at the time of Mary's
childhood. Hence, Mary could have been raised only
in a church of the "people of other faiths."
History provides ample documentation toformulate the assumption that Mary is of ParthianScythian descent. Consequently, her son's biologicalaspect also points to the teaching of a faith andreligious morality directly opposed to Jewish
ideology. That opposition was apparently felt andresented by the Jews, as Josephus writes: "The Jews
always hated the Galileans." Here, our investigation
leads us to an interesting twist if we examine a few
documents regarding Jesus' background:
1. Werner Keller, in his book—released in nearly
every language—references this event when
he tells us that the magi, traveling to greet
Jesus and arriving from the East, came fromthe Institute of Astronomy in Sippar,
Mesopotamia; and that the German scholar,
120

Schnabel, read records that can be connectedto Jesus' birth from one of the cuneiform
writings found in that ancient city (Y la Biblia
tiene razon. Edicion Omega 1957, Page 348-9).
At the time of Jesus' birth, the Parthian Empire
is at its peak and is Rome's archenemy. The
Parthians have defeated the attacking Roman
Legions three times. This huge empire
stretches from the Euphrates to the Indus, andassures its people's peace and wellbeing for
500 years. For decades before Jesus' birth,
Galilee and Samaria have been also under
Parthian authority during the governorship ofParthian Prince Adiabene. It is also common
knowledge that the Parthian kings rebuilt theirdestroyed Sumerian cities, and nursed theirancient Sumerian traditions. In light of theabove, we can state with certainty that during
Jesus' time, Sumerian cuneiform literature was
not yet hidden under the sand, and that themain citadels of Sumerian science (Nippur, Ur,
Uruk, Kis, Mari, etc.) existed. And one of these
was the Institute of Astronomy of Sippar,
whence the magi (reportedly) left for theirpilgrimage to Jesus.
2. Next to Mary's name, we always find the
Greek word Parthenos. Many people translate
the meaning of this word to Parthian, though,121

according to students of the Bible, the correcttranslation from Greek is virgin. Perhaps thecorrect concept this Greek word defines is"Parthian virgin."
3. We read in Acts of Pilate (9.3) that the Jews,
fully aware that the Parthians are Rome's
archenemies, argue their accusation of Jesus
to Pilate stating that the magi came from theEast to greet not the king of the Jews but theirown king: "We know that Caesar is king, and
not Jesus. For assuredly the magi brought gifts
to him as to a king."
Considering the above, the logical conclusion isthat:
1. Mary could not have been Semite, Hebrew or
Jewish either by birth or by rearing, and,2. She could only have been Galilean-Scythian(See below)-Sumerian.

122

The Scythians, the biblical “people of otherfaiths”
But who exactly are these "people of otherfaiths?" In the above referenced dialog between
Jesus and the Jews regarding Jesus' lineage, Jesus,
refers to Psalm (of David) 110 where "David calls
him his Lord," and, in turn, asks the Jews: "... thenhow can he be his son?" (Luke 20:41-44). But Jesus,
referring to Psalm 110, also says something else: If
Jesus calls himself "David's Lord" in one part of thePsalm, then the part, "You are a priest foreveraccording to the Order of Melchizedek," also refers
to Jesus. Saul-Paul, in apparent ignorance ofMelchizedek's Sumerian faith, assumes that he wasa Jew when he calls Jesus "high priest foreveraccording to the Order of Melchizedek" in his letterto the Jews (Hebrews 6:20). According to thesesources, then, Jesus descends from Melchizedek's
kin and, as we shall see, so does his mother. So let
us research Melchizedek's clan.
"And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forthbread and wine: and he was the priest of themost high God" (Genesis 14:18).
Saul-Paul's letter, referenced above, calls
Melchizedek king of Salem:"This Melchizedek was king of Salem andpriest of God Most High" (Hebrews 7:1).
123

The place of which Melchizedek was king,however, is ill-defined. Jewish commentators claimthat Salem is Jerusalem. But (earlier) archaeologicalevidence says otherwise. Jerome maintains that theSalem of Melchizedek is not Jerusalem, but a town
near Scythopolis, and identifies it with the place
where John baptized. In fact, the ruins of the Palaceof Melchizedek were (then) still visible, and the site
was a pilgrim destination. Such physical evidence
undercuts any speculation to the contrary. Since it ishighly unlikely that a community some eight Roman
miles from a city the size of Scythopolis would haveits own king with a stature worthy of so muchreference, the reasonable conclusion is that
Melchizedek was a king who reigned over his people
from his palace in the suburbs of Scythopolis.
Here, we are already among Scythian kindred,that is, in the region of Scythopolis, about twenty-six
miles from Bethlehem, Galilee. It is here that
Melchizedek, "the high priest of God," once lived
and functioned; and just as Jesus did later, gave
bread and wine to his faithful in accordance with his
own religious rites. Further, according to Greek
Mythology, Bar-Kus was raised by nymphs here, in
Scythopolis, and it is here that he planted thefamous vineyards. This mythological account brings
Scythopolis even closer to the Scythian people
because Bar-Kus is Nib-Ur's (Nimrod) name in124

Greek, and the Scythians considered Nib-Ur(Nimrod) their patriarch.
A high level of mental discipline is needed not to
be fooled by various biblical writings referencing theOrder of Melchizedek. They explicitly emphasizethat "he was not a Jew," but a king of a "people who
had their own religion." Their teachers, the magi of
the Order of Melchizedek lead the Scythians toward
the Holy Trinity of Light according to the Scythians'
belief. This is why Bit-Lah-Mi (Bethlehem) hadreceived its name, "Home of the Virgin of Light"
much earlier. Scythian teaching foretells the birth of
the human Mother of God's Son coming to Earth,
here, in this town. And that is precisely what
happens thousands of years later.
When Badiny mentions these prophecies, he isfirst of all referring to the many cuneiform-written
predictions from the Sumerian city, Mari, which
mention "a divine visit appearing in human form."
The Uruk Oracle (2000 BC) speaks similarly. It
mentions the visit by the Mother Goddess. Similar
prophecies written during the middle of the second
millennium BC were found in Ugarit, Palestine. In
the study of Jesus' teaching, he underlines andemphasizes a very important fact: Melchizedek's
name in the cuneiform records originating from theKassita-kusita era, is written in the same languageas the names Bit-Sa-An, Scythopolis, "House of125

Heaven faces" and Bit-Lah-Mi, Bethlehem, "House of
the Virgin of Light." In this language, Melchizedek
appears as Milki-Ilu meaning the "God of Truth."
Since this is the name by which Jesus called theFather who sent him to Earth, Badiny ponders thelikelihood of Jesus referring to the Scythian king,
Milki-Ilu as his biological ancestor (Some believe
Milki-Ilu was one of several earlier incarnation of
En-Lil [Jesus])—others being Nib-Ur and Gudea.
Among the other non-Semitic peoples of Galilee
in Mary's and Jesus' time are the descendants ofSumerians whom the "Great Assyrian King"
resettled in Galilee and Samaria from Babylon, Kut,
Hamath, and Sepharvaim in place of the deported
Hebrews:"Then the king of Assyria brought people from
Babylon, Cuthah, Ava, Hamath, and from
Sepharvaim, and placed them in the cities ofSamaria instead of the children of Israel; andthey took possession of Samaria and dwelt in
its cities" (2 Kings 17:24).
And, here, the well-known orientalist and scholar(e.g., archeology, linguistics) W.F. Albright, provides
for us a very important piece of evidence regarding
the identity of these people: He identifies
Sepharvaim as Sippar, whence, according to Werner
Keller, the Parthian magi came to Jesus' cradle.
These people have kept their old faith, the magi's126

reverence of Light, as recited in the prayers ofseveral Christian religions: "According to the Orderof Melchizedek."
Considering the above, it is safe to say that
Scythopolis was the city of the people of Galilee andSamaria the Greeks called Scythians, and that MilkiIlu (Melchizedek) was their king. So let us researchthese so-called “Scythians.” Oppressed intellectuals
behind the Iron Curtain used to whisper among
themselves, “the past is unpredictable,” in reference
to artful historical propaganda, a perpetual
campaign of deceit, financed (mostly) by theAmerican Jewry and implemented by the progeny of
the Russian Jewish Blank family, Vladimir Lenin, tocontrol the masses. In our research, we run acrosscontemporary educational material in which we
recognize the same “artwork” as recurring patterns
in the web of deceit the Jewry has been spinning for
45
centuries.
One
of
its
trademarksismisrepresentation of peoples, a fraud exemplified by
the West's definition of the Scythians—the Greeks'
name for Magyar (biblical Magog), Hun peoples—
variably referred to as Huns, Iranians, Turanians
and Asians. Western literature typically defines themas nomadic warrior tribes of uncertain origin who
wandered on the steppes of Asia on horseback in the
7-3rd century BC and traded their grain with the
Greeks for gold until they disappeared from history127

after being conquered by the Sarmatians. So let us
look at a few of these descriptors, starting with the
Scythians' origin.
According to the Isfahan Codex, the Huns trace
their origin back 28,000 years (Detre, 2004, 2005),
while
GroverS.
Krantz,anthropologistatWashington State University, writes that the
distribution of the Magyar language allows only one
explanation, namely, that this language family,
already established in Hungary by the Early
Neolithic” (c.10,000 BC), spreads east (as the ice
retreats). Therefore, the language of the people wholive in, and east of the Carpathian Basin, according
to Krantz, is Magyar, “the oldest in-place languageof all of Europe,” as he puts it. Krantz' claim is
supported by—among others—a stick fragment
found in the 15-20,000 year old layer of the
Carpathian Basin (Jankovich Cave, Bajót, Hungary)which clearly shows carved symbols recognized as
Hungarian runic script (Freidrich, Klára, Selected
Studies in Hungarian History, 2008, p.303).
Examination of racial and cultural markers—otherthan language—of the early inhabitants of central
Eurasia also points to a homogeneous people byexclusion: Anthropologicalandarchaeologicalevidence shows an unbroken, substantially uniform
race and culture dating back to at least the Linear
Band Ceramics culture (5700 BC), centered in the128Carpathian Basin (T. Douglas Price et al., 2001).
Thousands of years later, the 3rd century BC
Babylonian historian, Berossos, links the Magyars'
mythological patriarch, Nib-Ur (Nimrod) to the
Scythians. Later still, emissaries arriving at the
king's court in the Carpathian Basin for the 1554
Székey National Conclave still call the Hungarians“Hun-Scythians.” According to these sources—andothers—the homogeneous indigenous peoples ofcentral Eurasia have an unbroken past dating backto at least the Early Neolithic; are called Huns, HunScythians and Hungarians; and speak and write theMagyar language.
Marton, Veronica gives us a fairly accurate
picture of the Scythians' origin and location, withconcentration on the Near East (The History of the
Chaldean-Sumerian People: Selected Studies in
Hungarian History, 2008, p. 575-576). The following
is a verbatim quotation from her work, including her
sources [in square brackets]:“1. The Old Stone Age (c. between
1.200.00-8000 B.C.) [Vértes, László: Kavics
Ösvény and Gáborné, Csánk Vera: Az ősember
Magyarországon, Gondolat, Budapest, 1980]
In 1965, in Vértesszőlős, in Hungary,archeologists found the skull-bone andremains of an erect tool-making ancient man
129

(archantropus) from the later phase of the
Paleolithic, together with his habitat, footprint
and stone tools. According to astronomical
chronology he was about 400-450 thousand
years old.
One of the oldest, erect beings, who can becalled human, is this so-called Vértesszőlős
man who lived during the later phase of the
Paleolithic(c.
1,200,000-200,000),
who
migrated from the Carpathian Basin, today's
Hungary, to all parts of the world. According to
P. V. Tobias, anthropologist, the paleanthropus
is a direct descendant of the Vértesszőlős man
and his descendant, the Homo sapeins.
'The vast majority of the Paleolithic man had arefinedstatureandbelongedtoananthropologically already specialized race...
Around the end of this epoch... different ...
racial types, ethnic types began to evolve—theforerunners of today's races and ethnic types.'
The era of the Ancient Man lasted 30,000
years from early 80,000 B.C. 'During the lastinterglacial, warm period, a series of new
cultures matured. They lay hidden and then,all of a sudden come to full bloom, as in a
130

green-house... In biological development weknow of such hidden states, which arefollowed by the 'revolutionary' cycle ofevolution. Genotypes that have not changed
for a long period of generations, almost in an
explosive manner, bring forth new genotypes
within a few generations... The evolution
branched off quickly and unexpectedly.' This is
the culture that is called Neanderthal type or,
after
its
Frencharcheologicalsite,
Moustierian, although it should be named after
Vértesszőlős.
'The last warm period before the lastglaciation—thebeginningof
themidPaleolithic—is the age of the real ancient man.
Around 70,000 they were already ... intelligent
human beings, on par with us and they
wondered as hunters in Europe and the Near
East. Their outer appearance still differedfrom today's people, but their life-style andculture were much more advanced than we
may think... They used stone tools whichappear simple ... and hunted.'
Following the lead of the Hungarianarcheologists, Miklós Gábori, Mrs. Vera Gábori
Csánk, Dr. Gyula László and also the American131

anthropologist Grover S. Krantz, one can statewith confidence that the eastern connection
with the Carpathian Basin already existed in
the Paleolithic!
2. Intermediary Paleolithic (c. 8000-5500
B.C.) [From the works of Colin Renfrew—Paul
Bahn: Régészet, Bp. 1999., Osiris]
In the Near East, between 8000-5500 B.C., in
the intermediary Paleolithic, the ancient manof the Near East had already given up his
hunting, gathering, fishing life-style and hadchanged to a hunting-nomadic life. The changeof life-style resulted in domesticating andcatching such animals, with which he was able
to cover greater distances and he was alsoable to settle down.
In the intermediary Paleolithic, the so called'Neolithic Revolution' did not bring a quickchange but it resulted in a long evolutionary
process lasting several thousand years. The
first settlements were formed. The earlier
hunters worked on the land, domesticatedanimals, grew cereal plants and started aprimitive form of commerce. Their settlements
were unearthed in three archeological sites, in132

Jarmo, Jerico and Catal Hülyük. [Professional
literature is not uniform concerning the age ofthe above settlements. Jermo can beconnected with the earliest agriculture andanimal husbandry and still they believe Jerico
to be the oldest. In every chronology (if it ismentioned at all) Jarmo is mentioned in thefirst place, Jerico follows and finally Catal
Hülyük. (MV)]The first settlement—Jarmo—of the so called
Pre-ceramic Age was excavated south of
Kirkuk (Western Iraq). 'Here not only thedomesticated cereal plants (spelt, barley, peasand lentils) were found but they were also able
to identify their transitional forms.' This is theearliest settlement where the inhabitants
practiced agriculture.
Jerico is the territory of today's Israel but, in
Paleolithic and Neolithic times, there were no
traces of Semitic or, to be more precise, Jewish
populations. Archeological finds of this age aretheproductsofthe
Vértesszőlős
(Neanderthal)-type
man.
Their
directdescendants were the human groups of the
Scythian race. (Semites appeared here only at
the turn of 3,000-2,000 B.C., but by the133centuries after Christ, they completely
replaced the Scythian indigenous population.)”Marton then traces the Scythians in 14 stages
from the Neolithic and early Copper Age to the
Persian conquest of Babylon in 539 BC. (An outlineof the history of the Scythians in the Near East fromthe Flood to Mary's birth was covered under
Historical overview, above).
Next, let us look at the “nomadic warrior tribes”
descriptors. The West likes to use the trendy terms,“nomadic” and “tribe“ to describe peoples it would
like to hide but cannot. But it often gets tangled up
in its own web. Its “historians” define the Scythians
as nomads, but then contradict themselves byclaiming that the Scythian “tribes” traded grain with
the Greeks for gold. They seem to forget that grain
production depends on farming, an activity that
precludes any sort of nomadic lifestyle. (The Kőrös
Culture, a settled farming society, is alreadyestablished in the Carpathian Basin by the 7th
millennium BC.) A more likely explanation for the
movement of people is transportation (their wheeledwagons have been found in 3rd millennium BC
strata) of raw materials and civilian and military
goods and supplies; control and administration of
their vast land; and seasonal activities related tolivestock husbandry and farming. There are also
several problems with the Scythians trading their134

grain with the Greeks for gold claim—though one
example should suffice. Huge quantities of gold
artifacts are found throughout Scythia, many ofwhich predate the Greeks (Scythia has anabundance of gold deposits). For example, an arm
from the throne of a 7th century BC Scythian king isevidence of (by then) an advanced civilization thatflourishes during a time when the Greeks do noteven (yet) exist (as a people).
The “warrior” adjective is probably appropriate,but only to a degree. Considering the dispersion of
their population over a wide area, protection ofcrops, livestock, farms and transportation routes,
both domestic and to the Far East, depends on
security provided by an effective military presence,
garrisoned at key points. And “tribes,” of course, isbut a subtle way to say “primitive.”
The “conquered by Sarmatians” claim is perhaps
the most absurd. If we examine the race, ethnicity,
traditions, customs, language, the place and time of
the Scythians and the Sarmatians, as described by
Herodotus (and others, e.g., Indians, Chinese), it isself-evident that the two names refer to the same
people. Since a people cannot conquer itself, thisclaim is pure nonsense. Since all of these findings(and more) have been available to scholars for sometime, the logical conclusion is that the history of the
Scythians in today's Western educational material is135deliberately falsified.
Other researchers, however, paint a different
picture. They show the Scythians, centered in the
Carpathian Basin, as a highly advanced civilization
with a mature written language, laws and beliefs
established over many thousands of years. Led bytheir magi, they enjoy a high standard of living
assured by an effective confederacy that promotes
agriculture, industry, the arts and sciences, andprotects person and property with a well-organized,
trained and equipped military. These magi (singularmagus, from Hungarian mag, seed, high, derived
from itself, sublime), wise men and women,scientists,
astronomers,
doctors,
pharmacists,
philosophers and teachers all in one, teach thesecrets of Nature, health and life, and predict
cosmic events from their astronomical observations(The magi are often referred to as culture-heroes
such as the legendary Celtic King Arthur and theMaya Hun-Hun-apu (Hunaphu) father of HunChowen, the patron of artisans, and Hun-Batz,
patron of writing [apu, is father in Hungarian]).
Their scientific world-view was far superior totoday's. They not only knew a more complete systemof natural laws than we know today, but the firstprinciples, too: physics, biology, and what we today
call psychology. We know from John Dayton that all
known metal Ages originate in the hub of the136

Scythian civilization, the Carpathian Basin (Metals,
Minerals, Glazing and Man, London, 1978). For
example, the Bronze Age is already well establishedin the Carpathian Basin by the end of the 6th
millennium BC, as evidenced by a 5000 BC bronze
adze, inscribed in Hun runic script, found inTorontal county. Three thousand years before theBronze Age reaches Western Europe, the Scythians
are already producing gold and bronze artifacts,
treasures rivaled only (later) by Egypt in number,quality and artistic value (see below) (The pantherhead throne arm and other gold artifacts depicting apanther are especially noteworthy because theArchmagus Gabriel calls the star “...arriving frombeyond the world on the day of his [Jesus'] birth” thePanther Star, which “will also arrive to augment thelight of the earthly planets, lighting up the heavens
to a level never before seen and thereby signaling
the arrival of the Son of God on Earth.” Further, NibUr [Nimrod] literally means “Panther-Lord”).

137

138

139

140

141

142

The Scythians maintain civil and military control
over an area that spans continents, as well as
historic cultural, trade and diplomatic ties with India
and China. Like all societies, they, too, have theirshare of internal civil disturbances, disputes,
criminal activity and problems with illegal squattersand aggressive outsiders. Nevertheless, they
maintain internal order, and peace with theirneighbors to whom they introduce such beliefs as aninvisible benevolent Creator divinity symbolized by
the sun, and the concept of the Holy Crown “who”
unites people sharing a common culture into nations(Hungarians consider their Holy Crown a person,
the supreme sovereign to whom kings swear oaths
143

of allegiance). Grandpierre says, the Scythians are
known in 2nd millennium BC India (citing thePuranic Encyclopedia, 1989, p. 667) as the Maghadi
people of Saga and their Magi as Maga, while theirlanguage is called Maghori. The Scythian magi
establish the first monarchy in China, the Xia
Dynasty, named after the Xia Hun nation whose
king, Huang Di, founds the Chinese civilization in
the 3rd millennium BC. V. H. Mair, Professor of
Chinese Language and Literature proves that the“Chinese” word for scholar of natural sciences, andphilosopher magus, is of Central-Asian origin; andHarper (1995) says the teachings of the magi were
important, primarily in the [Chinese] royal religion.
The Scythians already build their churches andwrite their prayers on clay amulets in the 6th
millennium BC (Tatárlaka), and construct the“Scythian Stone Circles,” similar to Stonehenge, in
4800 BC – 500 AD. 4th millennium BC amulets foundin Egyptian graves attest to the presence of Scythian(Chaldean) magi during the creation of Egypt's
culture; and Scythians found the first civilizations in
Mesopotamia where they also introduce writing(Jemdet Nasr [name of excavation site, Iraq] people)
around 3000 BC and, in the Americas, theagriculture-based Maya civilization, founded on theworship of an invisible Creator “God with three
faces,” Kinich Ahau (also called Iz-tam-Na),144

symbolized by the sun. When the future Greeks try
to unite city-states into a new Greek nation (6-4th
century BC), they invite the magi to teach the first
Classical Greek thinkers, Pythagoras, Socrates,
Plato and Aristotle. “Plato often remembered that heand Pythagoras learned the best and most noble
teachings from the Magi” (Clement of Alexandria).
Diogenes Laertius writes that the magi educatedAristotle, and taught him that “...the stars are on
fire; that a lunar eclipse is the Earth's shadow; thatthe soul survives death; that the rain is caused bychanges in the atmosphere...” and much more.
Unfortunately, most of the Scythians' records
within reach of the Holy Roman Empire and its
successors have been destroyed during the cultural
genocide that began in the 10th century. The
number of Scythian texts burned to ashes cannot
even be estimated. The edict of 1047 (Hungary)bans—under penalty of “loss of head andproperty”—the “Ancient Scythian Religion” and“Pagan writing.” The cultural genocide includes theburning down of entire libraries, book repositories
and family collections. During the Inquisition,
tracking down and burning runic-written text—alongwith their safe-keepers, the magi and the Táltos—isthe prime function of the bishops assigned to
Hungary by the Holy See (“Táltos” is often[mis]translatedas
Shaman).
The
Austrian145

government commissions its agent, Stromler—whochanges his name to Thallódzi when he is appointed
to a leading position in the Hungarian Academy of
Science—to seek out and destroy ancient Magyar
cultural treasures (Magyar, Adorján). Leopold(Habsburg, 17th century) orders all of Hungary's
150 forts filled with historical records destroyed.
WhentheGermanlawyer,Hunsdorfer(hungarianized name, Hunfalvy) is installed as chief
librarian of the Hungarian Academy of Science, he
has Szentkatolnai Bálint Gábor's (a talented
Hungarian scholar who spoke more than 30
languages, [1844-1913]) entire collection of runicwritten scriptures burned to ashes.
Save a period of sanity during the reign of(Hungarian) King Mátyás Hunyadi (15th century),
the systematic destruction of the so-called “pagan
culture” ordered by the Holy See goes on for a
thousand years, not only in Hungary but throughout
Europe. Runic-written correspondence between
Prince Ferenc Rákóczi II and the Spanish Court
disappears without trace from the Court's library(Fehér, Walter Anna), as are the “book written in
Scythian letters” from the Library of the Duke of
Florence, referenced by István Számosközi in 1592,
and verified in 1595 by the Italian geographer,
Antonius Maginus. János Kájoni's study notes, dated
1673, dealing with “Hun-Magyar Runic Script”
146

(Frederich, Klára) also disappear without trace.
Even the magi's teachings of the sciences wereattacked and banned during the West's Age of
Ignorance—in which we still live today. Ignorant of
the principles of agriculture, sanitation and hygiene,
and the laws of Nature, Western Europeans could
only watch helplessly as entire populations were
wiped out when crops failed or diseases reachedepidemic proportions (The English word magic[French, magie] derives from the magi's knowledgeof the principles of health and agriculture, and of
the laws of Nature they relied on to heal disease,improve crop yields, calculate and predict droughts,
etc.,
abilities
Western-Europeans
didnotunderstand). While no one knows how many millions
of wood sticks and pages of paper written by the
Scythian-Hun-Magyar-Hungarians
have
been
destroyed, the above examples give us an idea of thescale of destruction. Yet, despite such efforts to routtheir history, there is enough literature left on themto fill several university libraries (found, now-days,
mostly in places beyond the reach of Western
powers [e.g., the Far East]). However, the above
should satisfy the needs of this study, so let us pickup their trail in 4th century BC Near East.
A wave of terror befalls the Scythians when Philip
II of Macedon dies and his 20-year-old son,Alexander, becomes king. The young king inherits
147his father's huge armies and, enjoying his new
powers, decides to go adventuring. What follows
depends on who writes his history. Western
historians like to call him Great, a military genius,and credit him with glorious conquests, monumental
construction projects and the reorganization of theregions he conquers—undertakings that would spancenturies—during his 13 year lark. Others consider
him, at best, an undisciplined youth addicted tosadism—and other vices—who goes on a rampage of
murderous destruction until even his battlehardened soldiers find his passionate cruelty so
repugnant, they kill him in 323 BC. Whatever hisreal history, the fact remains that, in just 13 years,
he manages to destroy everything his father andgrandfather spent their lives building, and thereby
brings an end to the promise of an advanced
Macedonian civilization (The Romans dismantle
Macedon in 168 BC). The Scythians eventually
emerge from their nightmare, form an alliance(Medes, Chaldeans and other kindred) and re-enter
the stage of history in 256 BC as the ParthianEmpire. (The term Parthian is a political definition,
like American, whereas Scythian is a people such as
Mayan. Parthian-Scythian is similar in meaning toAmerican-Mayan.)
We begin our study of the Scythians' spirituality
by looking up the Amarna texts (letters) dating from148

Kassita (Kusita) times (14th century BC), where wefind Scythopolis as Bit-Sa-An ("House of Heaven
Faces") near the ancient town of Bit-Lah-Mi ("Homeof the Virgin of Light"), Bethlehem of Galilee.
Therefore, it seems logical to conclude that the
Scythians called themselves "People of Heaven
Faces." This name gains further support in the
Hungarian
Chronicle,
TarihiÜngürüs:The
Scythians, the twins (people) Hunor and Magor—
who also consider Nib-Ur (Nimrod) their patriarch—
set out from Adjem, that is, Elam. These people also
refer to themselves by that name, as evidenced by
the expression An-Sa-An (in cuneiform) meaning"Home of the Heaven Faces." Interestingly, anotherbranch of the Scythians, the Szabirs, (Sumerians),
who also consider themselves children of Nib-Ur(Nimrod), refer to themselves by a similar name, SaPir, meaning "sun faced" people.
So far we know that the Scythians refer tothemselves as people who turn their faces toward
the heavens or the sun. We also know that a town
near Scythopolis, Bethlehem, is formerly called theHome of the Virgin of Light, where the Virgin Mary
gives birth to Jesus, the Son of Light, 1400 years
after the Amarna texts (Letters) are written. So far,this place name supports the premise that Mary is
the Virgin Mother Goddess incarnate, foretold in
ancient coming of God prophecies of the “people of149

other faiths," whose mission is to conceive the Sonof Light in compliance with, and fulfillment of thedivine laws of nature. Since research to date could
not determine Mary's birthplace, the logicalinference is that Mary, Jesus' Mother, is also born
here, in Bethlehem of Galilee. We can now expand
our understanding of the Scythians' belief bydiscovering a motive to turn their faces toward theheavens or the sun. And that motive is reverence of
the Light, Son of Light and Virgin of Light, a female
deity they call Virgin Mother Goddess, who takes onhuman form to give birth to the incarnate Son ofGod.
This is how much we know of the Scythians'
spirituality from the Bible and the writings
referenced above. Other than references toMelchizedek and the destruction of "places ofcorruption" on "high places"—along with arepertoire of negative teachings about the "people ofother faiths"—the Bible does not say much about the
Scythians' belief. To find out more, we must seek
sources of first-hand knowledge. And who could bebetter informed about the Scythians' beliefs thantheir own intellectuals, Jesus' closest students, his
disciples? So let us first find out who they are,where do they teach, and what happened to theirwritings?

150

What happened to the apostles?
According to the Christian priests' breviary, Jesus'
apostles organize, first and foremost in the ParthianEmpire, the true Church according to Jesus'
teachings, of which Saul-Paul speculations aretotally ignorant. Jesus' Church, immune from Jewish
ideology and teaching, is the Church of neighborly
love where the "eye-for-eye, tooth-for-tooth"vengeance doctrine is unheard of.
Jesus said, "I came into the world, to testify to the
Truth. Everyone on the side of Truth listens to me"(John 18:37). But what is the truth? What happened
to Jesus' truth? Why were the people who advocated
his truth, the apostles, silenced? Why are thewritings of the apostles not in the Bible? As far as
their activities are concerned, the truth is that noneof them set foot in Rome. Rather they go on to teachthe truth they had learned from their teacher mostly
east of the Euphrates. Nearly all of them live in theParthian Empire, stretching form the Euphrates tothe Indus, where they organize Jesus' followers into
Jesus' Church. The magnitude of their work can beinferred from Eusebois (Eusebius). He tells us that,
following the collapse of the Parthian Empire,
Sassanid-Persian rulers (who recognized only
Zoroastrianism—a religion they reworked to suit
their needs) demolish no fewer than 360 Parthian151

churches. Therefore, the apostles are, in deed, very
busy building Jesus' Church. But not in Rome—andfor good reasons.
The apostles selected by Jesus, as we shall see,are also Galileans. Since they teach values that are
diametrically opposed to the Jewish ideologies Rabbi
Saul propagates, it is understandable that Saul's
new Jewish sect, Roman Orthodoxy (today's JudeoChristianity) totally omits all teachings andpreachings that contradict Saul-Paul or his
doctrines. In the New Testament, we are hardpressed to find even a single piece of writing that
directly originates from Jesus' apostles (Note: The
New Testament evangelist called Matthew should
not be confused with Jesus' disciple, later apostle).
In contrast, we find that 62 percent of the work
consists of Saul-Paul's doings.
According to the Acts of Apostles (12), Herod has
John's brother, Jacob, killed. That leaves ten of theoriginal twelve disciples, later apostles, to carry on
the work (Judas, Rabbi Saul's brother—according
Professor Aisleitner, citing pre-Epiphani scriptures—supposedly kills himself). However, from this point
forward, the New Testament book Acts of theApostles is but a deceptive title: it says nothing
about the acts of the apostles. In stead, it relates thetrips and conversions of the self-proclaimed"apostle," Saul-Paul. The only exception is Peter's152categorical rejection of Judaism in 15:7,10) :"But some of the sect of the Pharisees who had
believed stood up, saying, 'It is necessary tocircumcise them and to order them to observe
the Law of Moses'" (Acts 15:5). "After there
had been much debate, Peter stood up andsaid to them, 'Brethren, you know that in theearly days the Lord made a choice among you,that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear theword of the gospel and believe... Now,
therefore, why do you put God to the test byplacing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke
which neither our fathers nor we are able tobear?'"
Here, we can be sure Peter is opposed to any
connection with Judaism by outright rejecting itsvery cornerstone, circumcision, the substance of the
Jews' supposed contract with their god, along with
their laws, the Laws of Moses. He calls these laws
(the Torah, Moses' books 1-5 in the Bible) an"unbearable yoke." Yet Saul-Paul (and JudeoChristianity) propagates the continuation of Moses'
Laws, and thereby turns Jesus of Galilee into an
ordinary "sacrificial lamb" of Jewish sacrificeideology, "whose blood will wash away humanity'ssins." The idea that sins cannot be forgiven without
shedding blood is one of the basic tenets of theJewish religion—incorporated in Judeo-Christianity
153

by Saul-Paul:"...without shedding of blood there is no
forgiveness" (Hebrews 9:22).
The concepts embedded in this dogma defy all
logic. First, we, not someone else, are responsible
for our actions. Any social order would fall apart if
people were to behave as they please because
someone else, a "sacrificial lamb" will wipe away
their sins (crimes). Jesus warns of this danger whenhe specifically rejects the notion of sacrifice, thisbasic tenet of Jewish ideology. He emphatically says:"I desire mercy, not sacrifice" (Matthew 9:13).
Further, this quotation clearly indicates Jesus'
rejection of not only Jewish sacrifice-ideology but
also Moses-ideology. It reveals his disgust with
Moses' immorality, which explicitly prohibits theexercise of mercy when the Jewish god supposedlyorders the genocide of the Canaanites (for example):"You must completely destroy them... show
them no mercy" (Deuteronomy 7:2).
Second, the very idea that newborns are sinners
or that they are in anyway responsible for—and“damned” because of—their ancestors' sins is plain
absurd. How could a newborn have committed a sin,
any sin; and how can someone be held responsible
for the actions of another over whom he has nocontrol? This notion, threats of a vengeful god's
revenge against the innocent children of Jews
154

contemplating disobedience to the religious
dictators, stems from Old Testament ideology
conceived to keep the Jewry in check. Such notions
defy both common sense and even the mostprimitive sense of justice. Jesus never said we wereborn in sin, nor that his blood will wash away any
sort of past, present or future sins. And nowhere do
his disciples (later apostles) profess that Jesus came
to Earth to sacrifice himself for our sins—or any
other Paulist ideology—as claimed by the Church.
Consequently, there is no need for redemption ofsins that do not exist. These notions are puretheological fabrications Judeo-Christianity invented
to plant a sense of inferiority in the Gentiles' minds
and thereby assure their subjugation. What we dohear is Jesus referring to himself as Light, and his
apostles teaching that the Son of Light came to
Earth to find and conserve that which is lost;
namely, belief in Man's divine origin, and theglorification of everyone's God, the God he comparesto the sun, the God who cares for everyone,
including Jews. It is to this end that he shows his
divine entity to an immoral world by conquering
death. This is what Jesus' real apostles proclaim.
Blatant disregard for the belief and teachings ofPeter, whom Jesus appointed head of his Church; theabsence of any reference by Jesus to any kind of“original sin”; Jesus' emphatic rejection of the Jews'
155

sacrifice-ideology and Mosaic immorality; and theexclusion of all writings by Jesus' disciples point topursuit of an agenda to serve other interests. Simply
put, Rabbi Saul-Paul hijacks the Jesus Faith andturns it into a vehicle for the spiritual enslavementof non-Jews, a subservient Jewish sect for Gentiles
his successors later harangue throughout the Roman
Empire as Christianity.
Elsewhere, however, the apostles are busy
teaching Jesus' truth to sympathetic audiences.
According to the Christian priests' breviary:
Matthew: "... soon travels to Ethiopia [not tobe confused with today's Ethiopia], the land of
the Kus... converts its king, his wife and theentire country to the faith of Christ..."Simon and Thaddeus: "...Simon the Canaanite
went through Egypt preaching the Gospel,
whileas the like was done in Mesopotamia byThaddeus. They met together afterwards in
Persia, where they begot countless children inJesus Christ, spread the faith far and wide in
those lands..." [It should be noted, here, that
Persia did not exist in the days of the apostles.
The "far and wide in those lands" referenced in
the breviary was called Parthia.]156

Andrew (Peter's brother) "...following Jesus'
suffering and resurrection, Andrew came toEurope's Scythia, which province he wasallocated to disseminate Christ's faith."Thomas: "...The Apostle Thomas was a
Galilean. After the descent of the Holy Spirit,
he went into many provinces to preach Christ's
Gospel. He gave knowledge of Christ's faithand the Laws of Life to the Parthians, Medes,
Persians, Hyrcanians, and Bactrians. He went
last to the East Indies where he schooled thepeople in Christ's religion."
Bartholomew: "... The Apostle Bartholomew
was a Galilean. In the division of the worldamong the Apostles it fell to his lot to preachthe Gospel of Jesus Christ in hither India. He
went thither and preached to those nations thecoming of the Lord Jesus, according to theGospel of Matthew. When he had turned manyin that province to Jesus Christ, and hadendured many toils and woes, he came into theGreater Armenia. There he brought Jesus' faithto King Polymius, his wife, and likewise theinhabitants of twelve cities...”Philip: "...was born in Bethsaida [Galilee] and,157

with strength from the Holy Spirit, went to
Scythia to proclaim the Gospel—and gained
many followers of The Faith."
Therefore, according to the Christian priests'
breviary, Jesus' apostles organize, first and foremostin the Parthian Empire, the true Church according
to Jesus' teachings, of which Saul-Paul speculations
are totally ignorant. Jesus' Church, immune fromJewish ideology and teaching, is the Church ofneighborly love where the "eye-for-eye, tooth-fortooth" vengeance doctrine is unheard of. Here,people live by the love-thy-neighbor principle, bothin belief and in practice. They believe that life is thecommon existence of light and darkness. Light
creates wisdom, benevolence, the arts and is thesource of life; while apathy, ignorance, envy, hatred,
vengeance, dishonesty, greed, theft, deception,
insincerity and wasteful laziness fall under thedomain of darkness. Since, in the Parthianterritories, neighborly love has been the foundation
upon which the Scythians built their lives even
before the apostles' arrival, organizing a Church ofneighborly love does not run into any opposition.
Rather, the effort finds a culture already living bythat principle.

158

What happened to the apostles writings?
The question that begs is: if Christianity
conserved the writings of Saul-Paul, a man who
never even met Jesus let alone hear him teach, why
did it not conserve the writings of those who did, hisstudents, the apostles? To formulate the rightanswer, several historical realities have to beconsidered. We must start back in the 2nd century
when the Paulist Orthodoxy, centered in Rome,completely adopts the intolerant synagogue-style
approach to religion namely, that"all teachings and writings that do notemanate from the synagogue are to beconsidered heresies and subject to destruction
along with their advocates."
Consequently, during that same century, the Churchthat calls itself Roman Orthodox burns and destroys
every piece of the apostles writings it can find. In
the 4th century, Constantin merges the various
religions into the worship of the sun-deity Chrestos,“Sol-Invictus,” “Unconquered Sun,”—celebrated on
December 25th—and declares it Rome's statereligion. The rabbis of the Roman Orthodox Church
infiltrate the hierarchy of the new state-religion and,by late 4th early 5th century, successfully subvert
the “Sol-Invictus” religion. They replace the identityof the “good” Egyptian-Roman sun-god, Chrestos by159

that of Judaisms “messiah,” Christos. Roman
Catholicism is born. Knowledge (gnosis) of Jesus'
true identity becomes heresy and its teaching is now
punishable by death.
However, despite all the punitive measures taken
to eradicate gnosis, knowledge spreads; and around
140 AD, hand-written copies of the apostles' gospels
begin to appear in Egypt and Alexandria. This fact isconfirmed by the 52-piece hand-written scripture
found by an Arab farmer in 1945 in Nag-Hammadi,
Egypt (not to be confused with the Dead Sea Scrolls
found later in the West Bank, Jordan). The NagHammadi scriptures contain the Gospel of Thomas,
the Gospel of Philip, the Apocryphon of John, theGospel of Faith, the Gospel of the Egyptians (theBook of the Invisible Spirit), the Letter of Peter toPhilip, the Apocryphon of Peter, the Gospel of Mary
Magdala, and other manuscripts.
Jesus teaches that all men are of equal value to
God and that it is the light of wisdom that brings
man closer and closer to God. This is why the socalled Gnostic Christians disagree with Church
dignitaries, the bishops, placing themselves between
God and Man, and thus reducing Man to a servant of
the Church and the Church hierarchy. They consider
this standpoint subversion of divine social order.
Significant theological differences in gnostic
teaching are the explanation of Jesus' God-Man
160

identity and mission, and God's designation of thewoman's role in life. According to Roman Orthodox
dogma, Jesus is the Son of God in a human body; hedied on the cross; he was buried; he resurrected inhuman form on the third day; and forty days later,
ascended to Heaven also in a human body. In
contrast, Gnostics profess that Jesus is the Son of
God in a human body, but that he lays down or takes
on his human body at will. He resurrected on thethird day, and his spirit appeared and appears
wherever, whenever he wants. Forty days later, heascended to Heaven as light visible with human
eyes.
Since
Jesus'
divineandsuperhumancharacteristic, that is, his ability to take on and lay
down his human form at will, is foreign to Roman
Orthodoxy, it is overlooked as a threat, and is left in
the canonized gospels which confirm it. All we needis the right point of view to understand John where
Jesus says:"...I lay down My life so that I may take itagain." and "No one has taken it away fromMe, but I lay it down on My own initiative I
have the power to lay it down, and I have thepower to take it up again" (10:17-18).
Roman Orthodoxy seeks to justify Jesus' tortureand crucifixion by claiming a need for a sacrifice to“God” in the interest of “wiping away Man's sins,” a161

ritual killing with divine accord acknowledged andproclaimed by the Church. That is why it explains
Jesus' last words, "My God, why have you forsakenme," words it ascribes to the suffering, dying, Jesus,
as “God's abandonment of his sacrificial son.” Theproblem with this explanation is that Jesus neversaid such a thing. He said, in Aramaic: "Eli! Eli!
Lama Sabaktani." And, according to linguistic rules,
this phonetically written sentence is pronounced:"Eli! Eli! Lama Sabag Ta-Nim" which, by one
interpretation, means "My God, my God, Raise he
who is wounded into the home of eternity." Anotherinterpretation is "My God! my God! help me toliberation." Either way, his plea does not suggest
abandonment of any sort.
During our investigation into the circumstancesof Jesus' death, we run into a few oddities. For
instance, how is it possible that Matthew and Markrelate Jesus' last words when they were not evenpresent at his crucifixion, while John, who according
to the teachings of the Church, was one of Jesus'
disciples, whom Jesus loved most, and who(supposedly) stood under the cross, does not
mention this? We can give several answers to thisquestion. The closest is in the Gospel of John whichlists those who stood under Jesus' cross (John
19:25). It lists only women. And here, we note two
distinguished personalities: Jesus' mother, Mary and162

Mary Magdala. Further, it should be kept in mind
that, according to the ordinances of both the Templeof Jerusalem and the Romans, no males are
permitted at the site of crucifixions—for obvious
security reasons. Therefore, John could not havebeen the disciple to whom Jesus says from the cross,"Behold your mother" (John 19:26-27). And,
therefore, neither could he be the disciple Jesus"loved most." But if not John, then who? We find theanswer in the Gnostic gospels of Nag-Hammadi.
Looking for the disciple Jesus loved most leads toa quite interesting yet delicate topic. In the Gospelof John (21), this disciple is mentioned several times,
but the evangelist, inexplicably and secretly, nevermentions who it is. Let us read the text of thegospel:"Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved said
to Peter, 'It is the Lord'" (John 21:7)... "Peter,
turning around, saw the disciple whom Jesus
loved following them; the one who also rested
on His bosom at the supper..." (John 21:20).
"This is the disciple who is testifying to thesethings and wrote these things, and we knowthat his testimony is true" (John 21:24).
The erasure and deliberate hiding of thisdisciple's name from the gospels incontestably
serves the goals of Roman Orthodox policy well—as
we shall see.
163

The Gospels of Nag-Hammadi
Dialog of the Savior is the title of the writing that
relates the following events. "Three disciples
received special instructions from Jesus, Thomas,
Andrew and Mary Magdala, whom Jesus placed
above the other two, ...because she spoke as thewoman who understands completely." These same
scriptures call Mary Magdala "visionary" and adisciple who outranks the others. According to theGospel of Philip, "competition broke out among themale disciples because of Mary Magdala, whom
Jesus considered his innermost companion and thesymbol of wisdom; because he loved her more thanhis other disciples, and often kissed her." In light of
the above, we can now also understand why Jesus
appears first to Mary Magdala after his resurrection.
We can also see that Mary Magdala is Jesus' disciple
and one of the twelve apostles, despite JudeoChristianity's refusal to acknowledge her as either adisciple or as an apostle. To this day, it has
portrayed her in the mind of the believer as "anunprincipled" woman. But let us have a look at thiselusive, supposedly "unprincipled" personage.
First, let us examine her name. Mary Magdalene
is a name given by Roman Orthodoxy, a rework ofher authentic name Magdala, used in gnostic
literature. The meaning of her name, Magdala, is a164reference to her place of origin, a city on the west
shore of the Lake Galilee: Mag-Da-La, “Radiant Cityof Magi” in Sumerian-Aramaic, its etymology being,
Mag, wise; Da, of (place name suffix); La,
illuminating, radiant, figuratively, perfect. (Mag-Da,
Magda, is a common Hungarian girls' name to thisday.)

Town of Magdala on the west shore of Lake (Sea of)Galilee.
Now that we know the meaning of her name, as
well as her place of origin in Galilee, let us see what165

one prominent 15th century artist knew about her.
Leonardo daVinci clearly knew about Mary Magdala
as Jesus' beloved—and more. In his 1498 painting,
The Last Supper, a female figure with girlish face,long hair and lowered eyes occupies the place ofhonor on Jesus' right, while all the others lookahead. In those days, it was not proper for women toraise their eyes in the company of men. Even today,theHungarian
expressionforlowered-eyes(szemérmes) is the word for chaste, reticent. So thequestion begs: did Leonardo still know back in 1498
that Mary Magdala was the "favorite" disciple at theoccasion of the Lord's Supper described by John as"resting on Jesus' bosom at the supper"? Alsointeresting are the glasses on the table and the
biscuit-size buns. In those days, production ofglassware of the purity shown in the painting was
limited to Egypt and Mesopotamia. And the price ofsuch glassware competed with that of wares madeof gold, possibly surpassing it. Wherever glasses ofsuch quality were found on a table, it was a sign thatthe company present are from the highest social
class. Their bread consists of tiny buns, typical
Scythian-Hun staple food. It is conceivable that
Italian artists familiar with, and regularly working inthe Vatican, came across writings that spoke ofthese biscuit-size buns, writings which have sincedisappeared.
166

Figure sitting on Jesus' right. Of significance is the
choice of colors for the clothing of the figure sitting
on Jesus' right, red cape over a blue dress: the exact
mirror image of Jesus' clothing—a combination wornby no one else present. Anyone who sees a man inthis picture...
167

DaVinci painted Mary Magdala's face using thesame model who posed for the angel in his Madonnaof the Rocks. Artists have always used female
models to depict adult angels.
168

But let us look further. Let us take a look at theGospel of Philip where Jesus teaches us about life as
human beings. "Fear not the flesh nor love it. If you
fear it, it will gain mastery over you. If you love it, it
will absorb you and paralyze you." Later, he gives
this law: "Great is the mystery of marriage. For
without it, the world would not exist. Now theexistence of the world depends on Man, and theexistence of Man depends on marriage." So let us
not wonder why the early Jesus Faith, devoid of any
Paulist ideology, revered Mary Magdala as Jesus'
beloved. This fact gains further credence in the
canonized Gospel of John, where she is the first
person to go to Jesus' tomb, "early in the morning,
while it was still dark" (20:1), and runs to inform
Peter and the disciples. Let us think human for a
moment:• Jesus considers her first in his earthly life;• Jesus considers her the first among his
disciples;• She is the faithful spouse who is the first one
at Jesus' tomb;• Jesus shows himself first to her and speaks
first to her after his resurrection;• Jesus often kisses her (There is a hole in the
text following the verb kiss. Some claim that
Jesus kisses Mary on her mouth, others
dismiss such claims. So far, our knowledge of169

the Coptic language does not provide clues
either way. However, in Hungarian there two
verbs for kiss, and one of them, “csókol,”generally means kiss on the mouth.)
It is noteworthy that in John's writings, Mary
addresses Jesus as Rabboni, which, according to thecanonized Gospel of John means master (variably,teacher or, the more cheeky translation, rabbi):"Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself,and saith unto him, Rabboni; which is to say,
Master" (John 20:16).
However, Sumerian-Aramaic, Ra-Ba-Ni does notmean either master or teacher, and definitely not
rabbi, not even by the most convoluted translation.
Ra-Ba-Ni means "Light of the World."
Hopefully, we are not demeaning Jesus if we
believe him to be a real, living person whose life—
even in a human perspective—is complete. After all,it is in the union of man and woman that divine
blessing is realized according to God's plan ofblissful life. It is God who planted in Man's heart themagical sensation of being in love from which the"great mystery of marriage" issues. And, according
to Jesus' law, without that marriage, the world would
not exist. What damage could befall our spiritual
world if we were to become convinced throughlogical deduction that Jesus, the Son of God, whotook on a human body filled with the same blood as170

ours, the Son of Man, showed us example here, too?
This was to be the only way for him to fulfill thedivine will to become human.
The Gospel of Philip also tell us something else;
something about Jesus' Mother, the Virgin Mary,
whom Jesus also identifies with another face of theHoly Trinity, the Holy Spirit.
"The Spirit, Mother and Virgin, spouse of theheavenly Father. The Father of All joined with
the Virgin, who came down. This is the Holy
Spirit, who descended to the World. Jesus wasborn of this Holy Spirit" (62-66).
So what should we understand by the expression
Holy Spirit? Better yet, let us ask what did theauthors of these scriptures understand by thisexpression? The Book of Secrets of Nag-Hammadi
answers. "She is the invisible, Virgin, Perfect Spirit.
She became the Mother of all that exists, because
she existed before all else." And, Jesus speaks thisway:
"Just now my mother, the Holy Spirit, took me
by one of my hairs and carried me to Tabor,
the great mountain..." [Mount Tabor is 17 Km.
west of Lake Galilee].

171

So it seems that, at the spiritual level, Jesus
refers to his mother as the Holy Spirit. This172

relationship is depicted on the 12th century fresco
titled Holy Trinity, showing Father, Mother, Son,located in ancient “Avar” territory, today's
Urschalling, a town on the Austrian-German bordernear Lake Chiemsee (The “Avar” Empire, centered in
the Carpathian Basin, stretched from the Balkans totoday's France). This fresco had survived theideologies of the Holy Roman Empire until the 16th
century when the picture of the “Mother” waspainted over. But, when the paint started to peal off,
she reemerged from the original pigmentation of theplaster during restoration in the 1920s. No recordsof the painted image could be located, but locals
speculate that depicting her anatomically correct
was an affront to 16th century Christian morality. A
more likely (but equally speculative) assumption,
based on other 16th century Christian art depicting
the Holy Spirit, is that an image of a pigeon waspainted over her.
And now we know a little more about the
Scythians' spiritual beliefs. We also found one of thetwelve apostles, Mary Magdala. We can now turn tohistory in our search for Jesus' Truth.

173

The New Testament as recorded history: caveat
lector (reader beware)!
We must evaluate biblical texts and gospels
related to Jesus with a generous degree ofreservation because no effort is spared to force a
trace of Jesus' existence to pre-Jesus SemiticHebrew-Jewish history and tradition doctrine. With
judicious reservations though, we find many
irrelevant, forced references to the gospels of the
Old Testament. However, one example of such
“resourceful sourcing” should suffice to expose thefraud. The Gospel of Matthew states:“Then that which was spoken through
Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: 'And they
took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of theone whose price had been set by the sons ofIsrael'” (27:9).
But when we read the referenced quotation in thebook of Jeremiah, we find a totally different subject
matter. There is no mention of "thirty pieces ofsilver" nor can we find "whose price has been set by
the sons of Israel." This is what it says:"And Jeremiah said, 'The word of the Lordcame to me, saying, 'Behold, Hanamel the sonof Shallum your uncle is coming to you, saying,'Buy for yourself my field which is at Anathoth,for you have the right of redemption to buy it.'
174

Then Hanamel my uncle's son came to me inthe court of the guard according to the word of
the Lord and said to me, 'Buy my field, please,that is at Anathoth, which is in the land of
Benjamin; for you have the right of possession
and the redemption is yours; buy it for
yourself.' Then I knew that this was the wordof the Lord. I bought the field which was at
Anathoth from Hanamel my uncle's son, and I
weighed out the silver for him, seventeen
shekels of silver (32:6-9).
It is self-evident that the referenced material,
Jeremiah 32:6-9, relates some sort of real estate deal
that has nothing to do with the text of Matthew 27:9.
However, striking out the irrelevant forced
reference from Matthew 27:9, the text becomesquite clear:"Then that which was spoken was fulfilled."
This is nothing more than a quotation of Jesus'
words in John 5:39:"Search the Scriptures... It is these that testify
about Me."
What ancient scriptures is Jesus referring to? In
what language were they written? Official Roman
Orthodox theology does not even pose the question:
what language did the Jews speak in Judea? In what
language did they accuse Jesus in Pilate's court?
And in what language did Jesus speak to Pilate?
175

Herod, though he was not a Jew, was the king of theJews for 40 years by the favor of the Romans. And
the Romans spoke the same language Herod spoke,
Greek. This is Judea's official language in Jesus'
time. The people of Judea do not speak Hebrew(!)
The Galileans, for their part, speak their native
Aramaic. This is why they are immediately
recognized as foreigners whenever they speak
Greek. The gospels, too, are all written in Greek justas are all apocrypha. The only exception are the
Nag-Hammadi scriptures which are written in
Coptic. Many biblical scholars have also come to thisvery conclusion, and state without reservations:"Hebrew was a dead language in Jesus' time,and it has been determined that the Old
Testament was translated to Greek so the Jews
can understand it" (J.E. Conner PhD.: Christ
was not a Jew, The Christian Book Club,
Hawthorne, Ca., 1972, Page 28).
So the Judean Jews have become grecianized.
And fifty years after Jesus, the also grecianized Jew,
Josephus Flavius, becomes Galilee's governor, andwrites the history of the Jews, again, in Greek.
Therefore, it is inconceivable that Jesus could havebeen thinking about any sort of Hebrew scriptures
when he refers to "texts regarding him." For its part,
written Greek dates back only to the 9th century BC
and, at that time, is found only in and around today's
176

Greece. So the only "ancient writings" that can beconsidered are the Aramaic texts. And these arethose cuneiform writings whose language we today
call Sumerian. We can also list among these "ancient
texts" the same cuneiform writing witnessed bymonuments found at the same place. Built by the
Scythians, Scythopolis—as it is called in Jesus' time
—is also here, twenty-some miles from today's
Nazareth. Scythopolis is renamed to Beth-Shean
only later. Professional literature likes to call thesecuneiform inscriptions Phoenician, or the more
audacious, Ancient-Hebrew, despite the fact that
Semitic people only lived here transitionally andonly in small numbers as wondering pastoralists andhabiru (drifters, criminals). The Old Testamentspares no effort to mention the people of Gog and
Magog who chased the Hebrews far away.
Therefore, we have every proof that the people ofGalilee can be called descendants of Scythians.
Consequently, we can affirm with authority that they
have kept and protected their Scythian traditions
with religious piety. And the most sacred of these
are their religious traditions. That is what Jews
ridicule in every language, along with the churches
Galilean Scythians' built on hills—which Jews call"mount of corruption"—because in these churches,
people do not revere the god of the Jews, called
Yahweh. Here, the faithful turn to the Virgin Mother177

of Light (Astare, Easter, Istar, Inanna), a divinity
symbolized by the sun (Bal), with their supplications.
That is why, even today, both Mary and Jesus are
depicted wearing the sun-disk halo, the “symbol” thegod of the Jews wants to "smash" in Ezeikel 6:4. The
substance of the Sumerians' spirit is reverence of
the Light and life rather than the destructive
ravages of darkness, wrath and vengefulness.
Now a few facts to dispel any delusions about
Aramaic, referenced above, as being a Semitic
language. If we carefully read the dictionary, we findthat it calls Aramaic a Semitic language but thencontradicts itself with its own stated facts. First,
names of geographical areas usually originate fromthe people who first lived there. We read that, after
the Flood, "people and animals emerged in themountains of Aram," Northern Mesopotamia.
However, the same dictionary does not consider
Mesopotamia a region inhabited by Semitic peoples.
Therefore, the original people of this region could
not have been Semites. This inference is supported
by Dr. Fáy Elek who originates the Armenians fromthe region of the Ararat mountains—today's Armenia—whose original name was Armenia. And thisregion, according to the scientific community, wasinhabited by the Turanian (Scythian) people. He
references Plinius who maintains that the Scythians
were previously called Arams. Specifically, they178

came from an area in Northern Mesopotamia often
called Arameos, which is a name of Urartu whose
first king was Aram.
Moreover, the Talmud, itself acknowledges thisreality. "The first man spoke Aramaic" (Sanhedrin38b). Several researchers also maintain that the first
language was Aramaic. According to the Bible, theentire world spoke one language after the Flood.
And this was the language of Ut-nap-ishtim's(biblical Noah) great-grandson, Nib-Ur (Nimrod),whom Jews so passionately despise. Therefore, theTalmud also maintains that Aramaic was not a
Semitic language, but the language of the Jews'
hated enemies. This belief is further confirmed in
Sabbath 12b which states that Jews should neverpetition for their needs in Aramaic because the[Jewish] angels do not heed them, for they do notunderstand Aramaic. Likewise, Sota 33 states that
whoever makes personal requests in Aramaic, theministering [Jewish] angels pay no attention since
they do not understand Aramaic.
In the Bible, the Aramaic language appears
around 1000 BC, seemingly out of nowhere. So let
us look elsewhere to find traces of this language
before that time. Most scientist agree withgeologists William Ryan and Walter Pitmantime who
provide us with irrefutable evidence that the biblical
Flood occurred around 5500 BC, and turned a fresh179

water lake into what is today the Black Sea, justnorth of the Ararat mountains. So the question is,what language did the people who lived in that
region speak in 5500 BC? Disinformation literature
claims that they spoke a Semitic language akin to
Hebrew.
Suchaproposition,
however,
iscontradicted by both historical facts and common
sense. It is also easily undercut by the absence of
any archaeological or historical evidence supporting
any existence of Semitic people anywhere aroundthe Black Sea or Mesopotamia at that time and forthousands of years thereafter. The first reference toSemitic people in the region occurs only around2500 BC. Even the Hebrew Calendar—compiled by
Rabbi Yosi Halafta by reverse engineering during
the 2nd century AD—only starts with 3761 BC, one
year before the Jews' "Date of Creation"—though hedoes not explain who kept track of time before they—or, for that matter, the world—existed. In either
case, it is absurd to assert that the people who
emerged after the flood would speak a language towhich they will have not been exposed for thousandsof years. Further, a language does not emerge in fullmaturity from one day to the next, or even one
millennium to the next. Therefore, it is most likelythat the inhabitants of the region have been
speaking their native tongue for thousands of years
before the Flood.
180

Finally, Aramaic and Semitic are not only
different languages, they belong to different
language families (groups). Linguists generally
categorize languages as either Isolating, Inflectingor Agglutinative. Isolating (also analytic) is alanguage in which words are invariable, there are no
inflections or changeable endings, and grammatical
relations are indicated by word order. Examples are
Chinese, Vietnamese, and Samoan. English hassome features of isolating languages. Inflecting (alsosynthetic, fusional) is a language in whichgrammatical relationships are indicated by altering
the internal structure of words, often by changing
their endings. Examples are Greek, Latin, German,
and Semitic languages (Arabic and Hebrew). English
has some features of inflecting languages, too. And
agglutinative is a language in which grammatical
relationships are indicated by building up words outof long sequences of units, each of which indicates aparticular grammatical meaning. Examples are
Hungarian, Etruscan, Turkish, Basque, someCaucasian and Japanese. Further, since Sumerian,according to Archibald Sayce, Professor of Oriental
Studies in Oxford, is closely related to Hungarianand Basque, then it too must be considered anagglutinative language. Next we look at what The
Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English says
about Sumerians: "Sumerian as "adj. of or relating181

to Sumer, its ancient language, or the early, nonSemitic element it contributed to Babylonian
civilization; n. 1. a member of the indigenous nonSemitic people of ancient Babylonia. 2. theSumerianlanguage."AndtheEncyclopedia
Britannica states that, "Sumerian is clearly an
agglutinative language." Since the discoveries of
Hincks, Rawlinson, and Oppert in the eighteen
fifties, the Sumerian language has been routinely
called Scythic, that is, the language of the Scythians.
We now know that Sumerian—or Scythic—is theagglutinative language of (non-Semitic) Scythians
who live in Sumer, a region further defined as
Mesopotamia. Therefore, the people who emerge
after the Flood from the mountains of Aram, spreadthroughout Mesopotamia around 5500 BC and aresaid to be speaking Aramaic, speak an agglutinative
language rather than an inflecting “Semitic
language akin to Hebrew.”
We can follow other threads, too, such as thebiblical “language confusion”—keeping in mind theperspectives of its authors, namely, their ignoranceof the time of Nib-Ur's (Nimrod) reign (c. 5500 BC),
the Sumerian king who, they claim, ousted theirsupposed 18th century BC patriarch, Abraham. The
biblical “language confusion” story may be theproduct of three factors. One, Semites arriving in
Sumer do not understand Aramaic. Later, they are182

further confused when they also hear Greek. Two,their own language evolves differently in the various
isolated Semitic communities, depending on
exposure to the local Aramaic dialect. Since they do
not have a written language that could establish
commonality between the various spoken Hebrew
dialects, they cannot understand each other either.
And three, when they begin to write Hebrew, they do
so using the Sumerians' Aramaic alphabet—and,later, point to these texts in an effort to “prove” thatAramaic is a Semitic language. Then later, Hebrews
who learn to read are at a total loss, that is“confused,” when they cannot make sense of texts
they think are Hebrew but are, in fact, Aramaic.
Taken together, these facts seem adequate todisprove any association between Aramaic and
Semitic languages. Therefore propagating the notionthat Aramaic is a “Semitic language akin to Hebrew”
appears to be nothing more than disinformation toservice political interests, an effort to link Ut-napishtim (Noah) (and for Judeo-Christianity, Jesus) to
the Jews. It is far more reasonable to conclude that
the Aramaic language spreads far and wide withpeoples' cross-migrations beginning around 1000
BC, an era when one people is replaced by another.
And this migration includes the resettlement ofGalileeandSamariawith
Scythians
fromMesopotamia who bring with them their beliefs,
183

traditions, customs and culture including, of course,
their language, a dialect the local Canaanites
understand. These are the non-Semitic people wholive in Galilee during the time of Mary and Jesus: theancient Canaanites and the Sumerians whom the"Great Assyrian king" had resettled in Galilee andSamariafromBabylon,Kut,
Hamath,andSepharvaim (Sippar) in place of the deported
Hebrews. That is why the Aramaic language appears—seemingly out of nowhere—in the Bible around1000 BC.
Now that we have a good idea about who lives in
Galilee and what language they speak, let us
examine their customs and traditions. "...And they
all drank from it..." we read in the Gospel of Mark
when Jesus:"Had taken a cup and given thanks, He gave itto them" (14:23).
The author subsequently quotes Jesus saying:"This is my blood of the new covenant" (14:24).
Therefore, Jesus enters into a Blood-Alliance withhis disciples. This act on his part makes sense only if
one is schooled in Scythian traditions. The Scythians
are the only people who perform traditional BloodAlliance ceremonies during which neighborly lovetransforms into brotherly love when every brother tobe drips some of his blood into wine and drinks ofthe mix, thereby sealing the alliance through184

unification of blood. The Hungarian word for"brother," "testvér" literally means "blood of the
body." For followers of the Jesus Faith, the kinshipbetween Jesus and his followers is reinforced during
rites that turn wine and bread into Jesus' blood andbody, which the believer then consumes to reinforce
that bond. (Some Judeo-Christians also mimic thisrite, variously called transubstantiation, metousiosis,
trans-elementation, etc., but with a Jewish twist. To
them its purpose is not the reinforcement ofbrotherhood between Jesus and themselves, butrather, a human sacrifice to the Jewish god.)
Herodotus (5th century BC) confirms this Scythian
ceremony:"When the Scythians make solemn covenants
they mix their blood with wine and drink
thereof" (IV, 70).
Tacitus (XII. 47) (1st-2nd century) also confirms
this tradition as a Parthian alliance ceremony.
The similarities between Jesus' actions andwords, and the Parthian-Scythian Blood-Allianceceremonies are too great to be called coincidence. It
is beyond doubt that Jesus performs a Scythianreligious ceremony, dating back to ancient times andstill practiced in his day (and beyond), to seal his
New Alliance with his disciples, since such custom isunheard of in Jewish circles. The gospels make nomention of anyone dripping his blood in the wine185

mix during the Last Supper. However, when Jesus
gives his disciples the cup, he unambiguously
affirms:"This is my blood of the new covenant"During Jesus' time, the rulers of the ParthianEmpire are the only political leaders who practicethe sacrament of Blood-Alliance to seal their mostprecious and indissoluble agreements. This is the
only explanation for the perpetual help of Asian
brothers-in-arm
whose
alliance
assurestheParthians the political and military force needed torender Rome impotent against them for 500 years,
and to persuade the Roman Legions to give theborders of the Parthian Empire a wide birth.
But let us return to the "ancient writings" ofwhich Jesus is aware, all of which speak of him. Let
us look at the cuneiform scriptures found in Mari,
Mesopotamia, announcing that, "God's first-born,
the Light of the World, En-Lil, will one day take onhuman form and descend to Earth." This prophecy isfulfilled in the person of the Scythian Jesus, Son ofGod, whom we recognize as the Light of the World
worshiped 3000 years earlier, the En-Lil of Sumerianreligious consciousness. The Son of God is born a
Man among the progeny of the people of theprophecy; and gives his people a New Alliance.
The question is, why a new alliance? If he gives a
new alliance, then there must have been an old one.
186

Here, Judeo-Christians immediately point to thebiblical Old Testament. But, let us stop for a
moment. Let us examine the content of the biblical
Old Testament, and ask ourselves who contractedwith whom, and what were the terms of theircontract? In Moses I 17, God addresses Abraham inverse 9:"Then God said to Abraham, 'As for you, youmust keep my covenant, you and yourdescendants after you for the generations to
come'... This is my covenant with you and yourdescendants after you, the covenant you are tokeep: Every male among you shall becircumcised. You are to undergo circumcision,and it will be the sign of the covenant between
me and you."
Therefore, the biblical Old Testament is acontract between Abraham's god and Abraham andhis descendants, which stipulates that Abraham andhis descendants must circumcise their males. But isthis the alliance Jesus is referring to? Let us hear
what he says about the Jews' god and the terms of
their contract with their god:
"You are of your father the devil, and you want
to do the desires of your father. He was amurderer from the beginning, and does notstand in the truth because there is no truth inhim. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from187

his own nature, for he is a liar and the fatherof lies" (John 8:44),
and;"...Moses gave you circumcision...." (John7:22).
Therefore, Jesus certainly does not identify “Godthe Father" with the Jewish Yahweh. Further, he saysthat their practice of mutilating males originates notfrom any sort of god but from Moses. He does not
associate that practice with God or consider it analliance with God. Yet today's Christians close theirminds to the words Jesus spoke. When the Second
Vatican Council decrees that "Christians are
Abraham's children in faith," it overrules(!) Jesus
and asserts an absurdity. While it is always plausible
for a Gentile to be the biological descendant of
someone named Abraham, it is not even plausible
for any Gentile to be the child of Abraham in faithbecause such notion defies logic: The god of thebiblical Old Testament unambiguously excludes all
uncircumcised males:"And the uncircumcised male who hath not
been circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin,that soul shall be cut off from his peoples: hehath broken my covenant" (1 Moses 17:14).
Therefore, all uncircumcised males throughout
the world are automatically excluded from the group
the Vatican calls “Abraham's children in faith.”
188

The ineptitude of Gentiles is without precedent.
Century after century, they fail to realize that theirintellectual enslavement began with their rejectionof the Jesus-model which their own morality upholds
and demands. They bow their heads to an arrogant
contemptuous Jewish god who introduces himself bybarking out his very first commandment, "I am theLord, your God, you will not have other gods beforeme." But those who cite the Ten Commandments
usually neglect the entire text of this commandment,
which includes: "I am the Lord, your God, whobrought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery."
The latter part of this sentence makes it absolutely
clear that anyone who has not been brought "out of
Egypt, out of the land of slavery" has no connection
what so ever with this Jewish god or any contract heis claimed to have imposed on the Jews.
So if Jesus does not acknowledge thecircumcision compact called Old Testament, thenwhy is he giving a New Alliance? Since his words
and deeds are perfect—or, to the non-believer,learned and considered—we must assume, he is fully
aware of the beliefs of the people who predated any
Abraham. And the belief of these people is that EnLil, the Light of the World, Jesus, the divine being
since time eternal, had really entered into analliance with Man at an earlier time. And thisalliance is one of those "ancient writings" to which189he is referring. This is the "Old Alliance" between
him and Man, the alliance Man forgot after many
millennia of suffering, flight and migration. People
have lost the roots of God's Tree of Life and Jesus
came to replant them.

2500 BC Tree of Life retained in tradition as theChristmas Tree

190

The Sumerians' “religion”
The Sumerian tablets N.I 1117, 2337, 2473, 2742
are kept at the Museum of the University ofPennsylvania. Professor Samuel Noah Kramer of the
University of Pennsylvania mentions deciphering
these tablets in his book, Sumerian Mythology,(1963), in the chapter on the creation of the pickax.
In this chapter he calls the axe-adze pickax. In
Sumerian times the pickax is revered and plays avery important symbolic “religious” role. (Note: The
noun, “religion,” and the adjective, “religious,” asthey are used today, would be misnomers for theSumerians' spiritual beliefs and practices. To them,spirituality is not merely a side interest in religion ortheology in today's sense. Rather, it is the awarenessof Man's personal connection with the Universe, aunion which rests upon the most basic law of
Nature, the universal law of Life (Atilla Grandpierre,
Ancient People of the Royal Magi: The Magyars,
Selected Studies in Hungarian History, 2008, p.
353). Spirituality to the Scythians—Sumerians
included—is the pursuit of knowledge of the
Universe,
its
composition(matter,life,
consciousness),
energies(physical,
biological,
intellectual) and the laws that govern each form ofenergy and their interactions, knowledge that leads
to the wisdom needed to effectively tackle all fields
191

ofknowledge[Christiantradition
merelyacknowledges knowledge and wisdom as two of theSeven Gifts of the Holy Spirit]). Professor Kramer
states that all the writings on the tablets are very
easily deciphered except for a few sections whichcannot be understood. Professor Badiny says that,no doubt, we cannot yet understand everything fromthat age, but that all the Sumerian literary texts put
together will help us understand. However,professor Kramer writes his comments in 1963.
Since then, a number of emigrant Hungarian
sumerologists have been working on these texts, andthey have successfully deciphered those parts which
Professor Kramer stated could not be understood.
Their work reveals amazing information about theSumerian spiritual world. Instead of “creation of the
Pickax” they gave it the title, The Covenant.
To understand the text of this alliance, we need toreview the Sumerians' concept of God. At top centerof the Code of Ur-Nammu—written in Sumerian
cuneiform in the 21st century BC—is a six-pronged
star representing the Dual Trinity in Sumerian
spirituality. (The Jews appropriate this geometricform and, later, in the Early Modern Period [16-18th
century AD], begin calling it variably Magen David,
Star of David and Solomon's Seal, and start toidentify themselves with it. In light of the history of
the Jews, it is evident that this is the symbol the192

Jews frequently see during their “Babylonian Exile”[6th century BC], a symbol they later incorporate
into their canon—as they do the word Israel).
Gnostic Christians, as they are called today, attest to
this ancient symbol in their text of The Lord's Prayer
which begins as:"Our Father-Mother, who are beyond andwithin us, hollowed be Thy name in the dual
trinity."

Fény-Anya, Szent Lélek: Mother of Light, Holy Spirit
Fény-Atya: Father of Light
Ama-Tu-Anki: Birth-Mother of Heaven-EarthFény-Fiú: Son of Light

193

Section from an artist's concept of the Tree of Life
based on Hungarian mythology showing the Holy
Trinity as the visible mirror image of the three(invisible) faces of God.
The Sumerian name of the hemisphere in thecenter of the star is AZ, and its meaning is the sameas Brahman, wisdom, in Hinduism. AZ does not
simply exist because to exist is a function whichitself depends on reality. Rather, AZ is reality itself.
In a hyper-absolute sense, AZ means divine-reality,
the original being who is independent and completein every sense. AZ radiates the light of existence
into everyone and everything, but cannot be194imagined. In Sumerian wisdom, AZ brings existence
into being in the completeness of a dual trinity
operating as the radiance of divine-reality. This dualtrinity is the symbol ancient Sumerians use topersonify divine energy to give humanity some basis
when they try to infer the One-God, Creator andSource of Life energy-complex.
According to Sumerian belief, the self-unity
IZ(AZ)-TEN, God's unfathomable reality, can bethought of only by referring to symbols and mental
imagery of divine activities and functions. These
images are positive traits that exemplify God's
activities in a meaningful way. And, as we shall seein the dual trinity, this wisdom sees IZ-TEN's powerinthreedefinedactivities:
Creation,themaintenance of existence, and the creation of life. In
substance, these three activities constitute a triad.
However, we, earthly beings, cannot conceptualize
spiritual events and activities, or as the Sumerians
say, "matters of Heaven." Therefore, we needsomething we can relate to. So Sumerian wisdom
symbolizes this spiritual triad by its mirror image, aphysical reflection to which we can relate. This
reflection, the "matters of Earth," is interlocked with
its spiritual counterpart as Heaven and Earth areinterlocked in transubstantiation, a concept of God
becoming present in Man kept by Christianity
known as communion. It is the simultaneous care of195

"matters of Heaven and Earth" that unifies andinterlocks the two triads into a single dual-triad theSumerians called Dual Trinity. This is the notion,
inscribed on clay tablets 3000 years before
Christianity, that Jesus teaches in Matthew 6:10,(the Lord's Prayer): “on Earth as it is in Heaven.”
This is how ancient Sumerian wisdom expresses thementally intangible essentials inherent in thisimagery to the man thinking in the realm of
causative interdependence. Sumerians believe in
One God, and the names they give divine
manifestations are no more names of personages ofa polytheist pantheon than God, Creator, Lord, or
Almighty are names of different gods. These names
are labels that define universally observablemanifestations of power derived from a great, living“Light,” a pure intellectual energy source, a spiritual
power above and beyond Man.
Professor Badiny encourages us to ascend to ahigher level of empathy and to harness all our
intellectual faculties to gain the level ofunderstanding needed to approach the concept ofmonotheism
foundinSumerian
spiritual
consciousness. He encourages us to adopt theSumerians' wisdom and think of the divine trinity,
Enki-Amatuanki-Enlil, as a spiritual entity we,earthlings, simply cannot fathom. However, we canconceptualize a mirror image of the same divine196trinity, an entity to which we can relate, a mental
image, which mirrors the divine trinity, EnkiAmatuanki-Enlil as the earthly trinity, Father ofLight, Mother of Light (Holy Spirit) and Son of Light.
The
Sumerians'
personificationof
divinemanifestations is a human tendency, as alive today
as it was then. Hence we have Old Man Winter,
Father Time, Mother Earth, Mother Nature and soforth. He emphasizes that the oft-misinterpreted
names of Sumerian divinity refer not to several
gods, but to the one-and-the-same entity introduced
to us in terms we can understand. He uses several
analogies to help us approach the inexplicable bynoting its mentally tangible characteristics. In one
such analogy, he compares King Mátyás' words tothose spoken by Jesus when he (Badiny) references
King Mátyás' exploits to obtain unbiased information
about the state of the Hungarian people. Mátyás
would roam the country dressed as a student
experiencing first hand the life of the ordinary man.
When asked, he would say, "The King and I are one."
In another analogy, he relates Light to the sun, areality we cannot experience, and the Son of Lightto sunshine ("sun-energy") a reality we canexperience, to explain Jesus' words, "I and theFather are one," and “he who sees me sees the one
who sent me: (John 10:30, 12:45). By adopting
Professor Badiny's thinking, we can also relate the197

sun's warmth, warmth of life to Mother of Light,
mother, giver of life.
It should be noted that “life,” here, refers to theuniversal life-energy, which is a part of the energycomplex called God: it has nothing to do with thebiblical term “breath of life,” or with breathing life
into inanimate matter to turn it into a “living being”(Genesis 2:7). The term “breath of life” is often usedin ancient scriptures but it has nothing to do withbringing inanimate matter to life through any kind ofbreathing or otherwise. “Breath” in “breath of life”
means awareness, consciousness, soul, the mentalenergy—which is also a part of the energy-complex
called God—Man expends when he thinks. Professor
Alfréd Tóth confirms the association between thewords, divine breath, spirit, soul, and the humanmind in his Etymological Dictionary of Hungarian(EDH), 9, Etruscan and Hungarian, where he defines
the words ase and asi as: ase: breath, wind, soul;asi: inspiration, spirit, wind; Hungarian, ész, mind,
intellect, esz-es, rational, thinking (p. 258). Here,breath, spirit, soul, inspiration, mind and intellect
are all expressed by the same root word. So “breathof life” means awareness of life, the ability to infer auniversal life-energy from differences between
inanimate matter and living beings. This same
concept is also found in Egypt where “breath of life”
refers to wisdom itself, Creator, “A-men” (also198spelled, Amun) whose manifestation (Coptic, Hor;
Greek, Haru, Horus) called “Son of Truth” isassociated with the sun and is depicted inhieroglyphic writing as a falcon. Further, 5000-yearold clay tablets speak of “Man,” rather than mere
matter or dust, arriving to Earth (see below). All
verifiable scriptures imply that the Sumerians
believe, Man was not only alive but also intelligent
when he arrived on Earth. Any divine contact
thereafter merely advances or restores his
knowledge. Jesus confirms this belief when he gives
the reason for his incarnation:"I have come as Light into the World, so thateveryone who believes in Me will not remain in
darkness" (12:46).
Another way to look at the relationship between
the heavenly divine trinity and its earthly mirror
image is to imagine living out a life in a prison cell,with only a window facing north (on the Northern
Hemisphere) to see outside. We would never see thesun, though we would see daylight outside.
However, if we were to reach out between the bars
at hight noon, we would see sunshine on our handand feel the warmth of the sun. In other words, wewould experience the sun's effects. Though we could
not see the sun itself, we could infer its existence
and nature. Using this analogy, we now substitutethe Son of Light, Jesus, for the light of the sun we
199

can see. Hence, when Jesus says "I and the Father
are one," and “he who sees me sees the one who
sent me,” he is saying that sunlight and the sun are
one and the same because the former is amanifestation of the latter. He is the mirror image ofthe spiritual En-Lil whom we cannot see. Likewise,
the earthly Mother of Light, can be thought of as thewarmth of the sun we can feel. She is the mirror
image of the spiritual Ama-Tu-Anki, Mother ofHeaven and Earth whom we cannot feel. Also, Jesus
calls the Father “Truth,” a word we understand anduse to label reality. He is the mirror image of thespiritual En-Ki, the supreme intellect we cannot
fathom.
The Sumerians believe that, in the Dual Trinity,
En-Ki is the distributor and caretaker of the soul increated entities; Ana-Tu-Anki is the giver of eternal
life who looks after Man's spiritual existence, and
En-Lil is the source of eternal soul. The earthly
mirror image of the heavenly divine trinity radiates
into and within Man as his soul, that is, thetransubstantiation of the Father of Light, Mother ofLight and Son of Light in Man. This notion can becompared to water as life, a brook Man drinks fromto stay alive as the giver and sustainer of life, and aspring as the source of life. Although we give themdifferent names—water, brook and spring—bypushing the envelope of abstract thinking, we200

realize the three are one and the same: water
emerges as a spring and flows as brook.
The English word trinity is used throughout thisstudy to make it more readable, but “trinity” does
not really convey the Sumerian meaning. English“trinity” suggests three-in-one. However, the
Hungarian “hármasság” means something else, aconcept somewhat related to “three-ness.” This
word does not suggest three parts or elements
constituting one whole. Rather, it conveys the ideaof one whole having three characteristics (e.g, thesun is omnipresent, warm and bright all at the sametime).
The following is the Sumerian text of the Old
Alliance Jesus came to renew—for edification andremembrance. Note: English translations mostly fail
to correctly covey notions expressed in this text due
to inadequate language sensibility and limitations.
While it is easy to sense that the words Lord andAlmighty, expressed in the same language, label thesame concept when used in a religious context,
language proficiency and etymology, even whencombined, do not provide sufficient clues to sense
the relationship between words expressed indifferent languages without cultural immersion ineach one of them. For example, “lil” in thecompound word en-lil, literally lord + wind, breath,spirit does not suggest that En-Lil and the human201intellect are one and the same unless the translator
is aware that the user of this term believes that his
mind is the divine spirit within him. This is one
possible reason why Professor Kramer was unable todecipher the entire text. Language limitations areanother source of errors. Some Sumerian words
express complex ideas but have no English
equivalents. For example, KABTA(21) (Kapta in
Hungarian) is a word used to label a concept
remotely related to the function of a mold used in
casting. In such cases, conveying the idea correctly
would require extensive description.
Armed with our knowledge of the Sumerians'
concept of divinity, we can now examine the(unedited) text of the Old Alliance—keeping
translation limitations in mind. Names are
reproduced in their original forms. The following
words, however, carry special significance, and areherein described to help grasp the meaning they
convey:Ax Light-weight ax-like tool with a long-handle,
also used throughout history as a walking cane
and weapon. Hungarians have traditionallyequipped themselves with this ax, called“fokos,” until its steel-headed variant wasbanned at the end of World War II. Some later
designs extend the butt into the shape of apick, hence the term Pickax is sometimes
202

used. Professor Badiny also calls it “fokos.”
Em-Bar Hungarian “ember” means man,Mankind, and the root word equivalent of
human in nouns, adjectives and adverbs:
human,
humane,humanity,
humanly,humanely.
En-Lil Name used to reference God but
difficult to translate. Literally, it means LordSpirit, but literal translation, here, is all but
meaningless. Mary Magdala calls En-Lil
incarnate, Jesus, “Light of the World.” Avariant of her complex expression in
Hungarian,“világ-om”(hyphenatedforclarity), “my light,” “my world,” “my life,” “myeverything” is still used today in some parts(and poetry) of Hungary to address a loved
one. The root word “világ” means light, world
and creation, and is the root of hundreds ofwords that label such concepts as clarity,
cosmos and all that is known and unknown to
Man combined. When used to address
someone, it conveys the complex idea that the
loved one is thought of as the reason for one's
spirituality, existence and life. All magus
expressions translated to English as “Light”
can also mean “all that is known and unknown203

to Mankind.” Hence, Jesus' expression “I amthe Light” in Hungarian can also mean ”I am
all that is known and unknown (to you),” thesource and the destination, “the alpha and theomega, the beginning and the end.”
Iz-Ten Hungarian “Isten” means God, wisdom(it)self; Is, Iz: (see AZ, above), ten self. ”In the
beginning there was Logos” (John 1:1) (Logos,
divine wisdom, Merriam-Webster) Also Mayansun-deity, Iz-tam-Na, (or Itzam, Itzamna, HunItzamna), also called Hun-Ab-Ku, “Invisible
High God,” and Creator “with three faces,”
Kinich Ahau.
Kus Hungarian “Kos,” ram, “Aries” in theSumerian zodiac, a people; also theirpatriarch, Nib-Ur's (Nimrod) father, Ut-napishtim's (biblical Noah) grandson. The Kus arereferenced as a people who lived in northern
Mesopotamia, an exceptionally fertile landaround four major rivers: Barana, Idiglat, Kúr
and Ar-Ar (biblical Euphrates, Tigris, Pishon
and Gihon, [not necessarily in that order]).
Ancient texts mention the Land of Kus as the"Land of Abundance," and traditions associate
it with the biblical Garden of Eden. One of its
cities along the Tigris, Szubartu (city of204

Szabir), located 30 Km. south-west of Nimrod,
75 Km. north of Magar, is the land of the
Szabir, Sa-pir, sun-faced people Árpád's
relatives mention to Byzantine's emperor as
the ancient homeland of some ScythianMagyars (Wilhelm Gernot, Hurrian andSubarian Lands, England, 1989). Jesus, son of
the Kus (Ram) people is often called Lamb,
Hungarian, “Bárány.” With the “-a” suffix (of),this word becomes “Baranya,” the name of oneof the rivers of Mesopotamia (above) and alsoof a county of South-West Hungary inhabitedsince at least the Neolithic.
The Covenant (circa 3000 BC)
1. EN-LIL, according to his unchangeable
desire, separated Heaven from Earth and theEarth departed far from Heaven.
2. EN-LIL dug out the seed from the inside ofthe earth so that wheat could be grown from it
according to the law.
3. EN-LIL appointed the ax to be the symbol of
the alliance between Heaven and Earth andordered that work was the duty of the ax andthe reed basket.
205

4. EN-LIL exalted the ax made of gold and its
container made of silver. The head of the ax
was of lapis-lazuli and was as strong as theheavenly bull which was able to movefloodgates.
5. After EN-LIL had created the ax in this way,and had decreed its fate, he took the holycrown from his head and set it on the head of
EM-BAR, whom he had sent down to Earthbefore that. He now looked down on them withfavor.
6. The inhabitants of Heaven surrounded themand placed the holy ax in front of them.
7. The inhabitants of Heaven, uttered prayers
to EN-LIL and then, with a heavenly chorus,
gave EN-LIL’s holy ax to the earthly EM-BAR
so that he might use it as needed.
8. The heavenly chorus sang in this way: "Take
EN-LIL’s holy ax as an everlasting covenant.
We declare a covenant between us and you
and those who come after you.
9. IZ-TEN, through EN-LIL, gave the Earth and206

the Tree of Knowledge to you and yourdescendants for ever more. Settle and multiply
on the rich territories of the four rivers.
10. The Holy ax is the symbol of the Covenant
between us and you, who on the earthly placewith the result of work, will build IZ-TEN's
earthly empire. The Covenant of the Holy ax
will allow you to rule the world.
11. Therefore we order all of your descendants
to live and work with the power of theCovenant ax. Keep the ax in your hand and use
it well for the glory of EN-LIL."
12. When EN-LIL saw his golden ax in thehands of EM-BAR who settled on the Earth, heshot a bolt of lightning at the ax and his voicesounded like thunder on the Earth: "I made aCovenant with you EM-BAR of KUS. With thepower of the ax, you will be the Master of theWorld as long as you serve with loyalty andkeep my Covenant."
13. The inhabitants of Heaven helped the KUS(people) on the Earth, according to theCovenant. Abundance and happiness was on
the Earth under the strength of the ax.
20714. The ax built cities and the house of the ax
became the sanctuary of the truth but thehouse which rebels against the Covenant, thehome of disobedience, is the destroyer of theax.
15. The ax cuts off the head of Evil, throws
down its crown and cuts out its roots, but theTree of Life which grows the Flower ofGoodness is its helper and defender.
16. The father of EN-LIL decreed the duty of
the ax and, under the power of the Covenant
between Heaven and Earth, ordered that theax be glorified for all eternity.
17. The inhabitants of Heaven kept their
Covenant well because as the light of the soulleaves the body of the earthly EM-BAR, he has
power to form and rule the Earth and hecontinues the work of Creation, according to
the will of IZ-TEN. In the same way, among the
inhabitants of Heaven, EN-KI was the one who
created with the power of EN-LIL, every othermaterial and body on the Earth.
18. EN-KI, according to the Covenant, blessed
208the country of the Tree of Knowledge withtrees, plants, birds, and animals and caused
them to multiply all over the Earth and he hid
gold, silver, copper and all kinds of metals
inside the Earth. IS-KUR, one of the
inhabitants of Heaven, became the caretakerof all these because it was he who brought
gold and silver to Earth from Heaven.
19. After this, EN-KI filled the four rivers with
an abundance of fish. The heavenly caretakerof the waters was EN-BI-LU-LU.
20. The sons of EM-BAR, with the power of theTree of Knowledge, created the plow and theyoke. They formed them with the ax. They
planted the seeds which they received from
EN-LIL and the Earth became rich in harvests
of grain. The grain beautified the fields of the
Earth. The ax built irrigating canals and EN-KI
appointed EN-KIM-DU, one of the inhabitantsof Heaven, as caretaker of the canals.
21. Abundance and happiness filled the Earth.
The people started to build houses and KABTA,
an inhabitant of Heaven, taught thedescendants of KUS (people) to make bricks
and the frame for the bricks.
20922. The animals multiplied. They built stables
for them. They milked them. EN-KI wanted
DUMUZI, the loyal shepherd of Heaven, toteach the people of EN-LIL to care for the
animals and to use their milk. This is the way
the inhabitants of Heaven kept the Covenantwith the people of the Holy ax, the people of
EN-LIL, who were the descendants of the KUS(people).

210Artist's concept of EN-LIL giving Man the “HolyFokos,” symbol of Alliance. From Badiny, Magyar
Biblia (Hungarian Bible)
211

Golden Fokos (Scythian Treasures [blade broken
off])
From Badiny, Magyar Biblia (Hungarian Bible)

212Artist's concept of the Creation of Life
From Badiny, Magyar Biblia (Hungarian Bible)
213

This is the Old Alliance Jesus is referring to. It isthe content of the sacred belief of the people
referred to as Kus, Magyar, Hun, Sumerian,
Chaldean, Mede, Scythian, Magog—and several
other names. Wherever they live, they use the Ax of
Work; and royal standing demands that kings
fabricate En-Lil's sacred Ax out of gold to symbolize
their observance of the Sacred Alliance, exactly as itis laid down on the cuneiform-written tablets.
Accordingly, its head is lapis-lazuli. Archeologist's
have unearthed these artifacts—the most beautifulof which are on display among the ScythianTreasures—also in Sumer, as well as in the heart of
Scythia, Hungary. (Note: Hungarians are by nomeans the only Scythians. Recently, the Scots havetaken interest in exploring their Scythian heritage as
the source of the (6th century) Arthurian Legends
which they believe are rooted in Scythian culture.
Also there are the Irish, Welsh, Basques, Gauls,
Etruscans, Croats, Poles, Ukrainians, Armenians,
Kürts (Kurds) and others, all the indigenous peoplesof Central and Eastern Europe and Central andWestern Asia, as well as many pockets of people
from Ireland to Japan. However, those who have
kept
their
Scythianculture—including
theirlanguage—are found mostly in the CarpathianBasin.) The tablets themselves date from 3000 BC,
but the time of the event they relate is unknown.
214

What we do know is that excerpts of the“Chronicles” report that “The Kingship descended
again from Heaven after the Flood” (Marton). Here,the word “again” supports Man's “Heavenly” origin
reported in Article 5, “...whom he had sent down to
Earth before that.”
The tendency to interpret the above event assome sort of extra-terrestrial visitation demands a
momentary digression. Our urge to assume
relationships based on situational clues is as strong
as our urge to construct images based on visualclues. But jumping to conclusions, that is, inferring a
relationship before completing the situational
analysis, often leads to false assumptions. This
danger also lurks in the hasty interpretation of the
event
recordedon
thesetablets.
Suchinterpretations probably sound logical to those who
believe that the physical Universe constitutes all of
reality. However, as stated earlier, nothing in oursphere of knowledge gives us reason to believe thatit does. And if reality extends beyond our physicalworld—or even if it is merely possible that it does—
then such interpretations are premature conclusions
based on incomplete analyses. The problem withqualifying the “visitors” as “extra-terrestrials” isthat it implies that the “visiting” entities' point oforigin is, in every sense, somewhere beyond Earth.
But, the “report” neither states nor implies that it is.
215

It merely states that, to the earthly observer whose
senses are tuned to manifestations of only thephysical Universe, En-Lil and the “inhabitants ofHeaven” appeared as entities from beyond his
physical world, that is, their point of origin issomewhere beyond Earth only in the physical sense.
Mislabeling En-Lil and the “inhabitants of Heaven”
as extra-terrestrials and the reported event as a“visitation” are the products of ignorance or, at thevery least, careless thinking. In Western cultures,
Man generally believes that reality is limited to his
observable, physical Universe. Consequently the
English language (and many other languages) has
no convenient term (other than the ill-defined wordgod) to label an intelligent phenomena that appears
at random—or so it seems—physically but is present
at all times in ways Man can neither sense nor
observe. (The Hungarian word for such aphenomenon is “Tündér,” usually translated toEnglish as Fairy, though the English equivalent is aname given to mystical beings in folklore, so-called“Fairy-Tales.” In the ancient Celtic Faith, a Fairy is
associated with divinity just as in Hungarian Tündér
Ilona refers to the Heavenly Mother. JudeoChristianity turns Fairies into demons or pseudodemons).
Another problem with the term extra-terrestrial isthat it conveys the idea of “alien.” In the case at216

hand, the obvious question is, alien to whom?
Certainly not to “Em-bar [Man] sent down to Earthbefore.” Perhaps a better understanding of therelationship between En-Lil and Em-Bar would stem
not from a definition of the “visitor” but from abetter definition of the “visited.” In the Sumerians'
spirituality, Man, in human form, simultaneously
exists as a physical, spiritual and intellectual being,
able to interact with the material, living andconscious Universe of which he is a part. To them,Iz-Ten is not an “outsider” who “visits” the physicalworld. Rather, Man is an “insider,” an intra-cosmic
constituent of total reality, they call “The Truth” or
Iz-Ten.
Jesus' knowledge of Sumerian-Aramaic-Scythiantradition surely includes this old alliance. But healso knows very well that all the suffering his people
had endured cast the veil of forgetfulness onto
traditions. He knows he has to enter into a New
Alliance that will resurrect the spiritually wounded
and revive their sedentation, happiness, productivity
and high standard of living.

217

The Holy Spirit
The Father gives us the desire to seek the truth;
the Son shows us where to look; and the Mothergives us the strength to do it. It is perhaps in thisnotion that lies the most elevating inference of theHoly Trinity.
Reading the gospels, it is impossible to reason
out or justify Jesus' habit of meditating in the templeof Astare on the Mount of Olives, described by theJews as "mount of corruption," a habit we findwritten thus:"...He came out and proceeded as was His
custom to the Mount of Olives; and thedisciples also followed Him" (Luke 22:39).
"...at night he went out, and abode in themount that is called the Mount of Olives. And
all the people would get up early in themorning to come to Him in the temple to listen
to Him" (Luke 37-38).
"...Singing a hymn, they went out to the Mountof Olives" (Mark 14:26).
We could cite more quotations—form John as well—but the last quotation, above, Mark's, seems themost important because the evangelist reports that,after Jesus' disciples had entered into a Blood218

Alliance with Jesus, they go out to the Mount of
Olives together, "singing a hymn." Unwittingly,
logical questions emerge. Who are they praising?
What is their hymn like? Who did they learn it from,and why do they sing praise precisely on the Mountof Olives, at the site of the temple of "the despised(by the Jews)" Astare, Virgin of Light in the
Galileans' faith?
It is impossible to find answers to these questions
using the mentality of Judeo-Christian gospels. Logic
redirects us once more to gnostic writings. Bybasing our thinking on them [gnostic writings],
though quietly, but without fear, perhaps we can saythat Jesus, along with his disciples, is praising theVirgin of Light who appears to them as the Holy
Spirit in the Temple of the Virgin Mother situated on
the Mount of Olives. The Judeo-Christian gospels'
only usable contribution to our investigations ofhistory, here, is the ambiguous expressions
stemming from omissions and imprecise labeling. In
the gospels, Jesus makes a clear distinction between
the Holy Spirit and the Spirit of Truth. The
evangelist, John informs us of Jesus' constant use of
the expression "Spirit of Truth" (John 14:17, 15:26,
16:13). Further, Jesus associates the Spirit of Truth
with the Father (John 15:26).
The evangelists do not teach the concept of theHoly Spirit. Only Mark (13) informs us of Jesus'219encouragement of "those who have been handed
over to Courts of Law; are beaten up in synagogues
because of My name" telling them that the "HolySpirit" will then speak on behalf of the sufferer:"But be on your guard; for they will deliver you
to the courts, and you will be flogged in the
synagogues... When they arrest you and hand
you over, do not worry beforehand about what
you are to say, but say whatever is given you inthat hour; for it is not you who speak, but it is
the Holy Spirit" (Mark 13:9, 11).
Therefore, in all probability, by his expression the"Spirit of Truth derived from the Father," Jesus
means a divine presence in Man, manifest as his
natural tendency to seek to the truth, while the Holy
Spirit to him is the same as in gnostic teachings, theHeavenly Mother who cares about and loves
everyone equally, the Virgin of Light who, as her
son, has been since eternity.
Our observations regarding the above areconfirmed by the historical fact that, in the ParthianEmpire and—as Church documents state—Scythia,
churches founded by the apostles on the Jesus Faith
immediately inaugurate reverence of the Virgin ofLight in their cultures. Saul-Paulian Orthodoxy, on
the other hand, banishes the Virgin of Light. It keeps
the Father-Son-Holy Spirit trinity, but the Holy Spirit
for Roman Orthodoxy is only a remote divine
220authority to whom prayers must be addressed toobtain absolution by way of sacrifices. Since Jewish
tradition is to sacrifice animals to obtain forgivenessof sins, and since the animals most commonly slain
for such ends are pigeons, Judeo-Christianity depicts
the Holy Spirit, forgiver of sins, as a pigeon. For
Judeo-Christianity the Spirit in the trinity is notMother and Virgin, not joined to the Heavenly
Father, not the Holy Spirit incarnate, and not theentity who gives birth to Jesus as Gnostics believe
and write in their gospels (Gospel of Philip). Close to
600 years elapse before Roman Orthodoxy finallyacknowledges Jesus' Mother as the Virgin Mother,and the first shelter in her honor is built in
Alexandria. But to this day, she is not equated with
the Virgin of Light, the Holy Virgin who forever lives
as a manifestation of the Holy Trinity.
In Parthia and, later, among the followers of
Manichean and Persian Zoroastrian persuasions,however, her symbol, the eternal light in churches,
Sanctuary Lamp, or eternal Holy Fire, is piously
maintained and assures religious peace among
followers of the Jesus Faith. The Parthians' and theirdescendants' devotion to her is more than just a
religious ritual. It influences political state-authority
decisions. Consider the following historical example.
The Parthian Empire ceases to exist in 226 AD, andSassanid Persian rule begins. The Parthian-Hun221

Mahgar-Scythian people of the Jesus Faith migrate
north, and a large number of them arrive in the
Carpathian Basin where they link up with theirbretheren and become known as Huns and, later, as“Avars,” to whom Byzantine pays huge yearly sums
in gold to "buy" peace. Belief in the Holy Trinity ofLight is reinforced in the Carpathian Basin with thearrival of the Parthians' Jesus Faith as well as
Zoroastrian traditions. It must be, therefore,
acknowledged that the people of the former ParthianEmpire nurse the traditions of the Holy Fire withreligious piety. Meanwhile, Judeo-Christianity had
already become Byzantine's state-religion, andemperor Heraclius orders the desecration of theHoly Fire by ordering everyone to spit in it. He,
himself also does. In response, a Hun-Persian
alliance is formed for the purpose of retaliation, thepunishment of Byzantine, for the desecration of theHoly Fire. The enormous army under the commandand leadership of the Hun Bajánfi defeats Byzantine.
He then entrusts Sarbaraz, the commander of the
Persian forces arriving after the battle, to arrange apeace treaty according to instructions to the Greek
legation pleading for mercy, while he, himself
returns home to the Carpathian Basin with his army.
This raid is clear proof that the Magyar-Huns of the
Carpathian Basin are already followers of the Jesus
Faith, and that the Holy Fire represents for them the222same Holy Spirit, referenced above, as a legacy of
the Gnostics.
Such historical information when combined withthe aftermath of events in Hungary is quite
important not only to students of Hungarian history,
but also to everyone, regardless of nationality.
Specific to Hungarian interest, it substantiates the
Hungarians' devotion to Jesus. It also explains why
foreign troops of the Holy Roman Empire aredispatched to Hungary to defeat and kill Koppány,
the rightful heir of the Árpád Dynasty, quarter andexpose his body on fortress walls, and put Vajk
(Stephen I, 1000 AD) into power. Much controversy
surrounds this new king—and nothing is known
about the circumstances of his death. What is known
is that forced conversion to Judeo-Christianity
begins during his reign. Hungarians are declared
pagans, and those who remain faithful to the Holy
Fire, symbol of the Holy Spirit, the faithful who
refuse to sacrifice their benevolent Parthian Jesus
once again and reject the merciless, vengeful, alien
god of the Jews, are exterminated. The first four
centuries of the Hungarians' forced conversion to
Judeo-Christianity is hallmarked by the Inquisition's
persecution and extermination of the magi known as"Mágus-pörök" (pör(ök), legal proceeding(s)). This
Orthodoxy commits the same deeds with the
Hungarian people as it did with the Gnostics earlier.
223

It commissions the destruction of the written legacy
along with believers in the Son of Light. That is why
there are no runic-written heirlooms in Hungary,and why the majority of Hungarians today are
Roman Catholics.
And yet, the ancient faith, though buried for a
thousand years, is sprouting everywhere. People are
discovering the deception and are taking back Jesus'
legacy, which they feel is rightfully theirs.
In a global sense, the lesson is threefold. One,strong common religious beliefs unite people. Two,killing off the religious leadership of a people anddestroying records of their beliefs brings about
religious conversion. And three, forced religious
conversions are temporary because no amount of
human effort can eradicate the truth and the truth
will always sprout where sought.
That is why Jesus' words are so important, notonly to Hungarians, but to anyone who seeks thetruth. "Search the Scriptures," Jesus says. Ancient
Magyar-Hun-Scythian-Sumerian scriptures point theway back to the Creator; and the Spirit of Truth
drives Man to seek the truth about both his Creatorand himself:"the Spirit of Truth will be with you and will bein you" (John 14:17).
But the strength to pursue the truth and theprotection of the truthful along the way comes from224

the Virgin of Light, the protectress, guardian, theHoly Spirit of whom the Gnostics speak with such
beauty, wisdom and kindness. She renders Man's
spirit invincible. The Father gives us the desire toseek the truth; the Son shows us where to look; andthe Mother gives us the strength to do it. It isperhaps in this notion that lies the most elevating
inference of the Holy Trinity.

225

Bread of Life and Water of Life
Other than “Light,” Jesus also refers to himself as"the bread descended from Heaven," and:"I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me
will not hunger" (John 6:35).
In our study of traditions, we know of only two
human teachers who taught real and true neighborly
love as a manifestation of divine guidance in thesame way: Jesus and the Sumerian Gudea. And thetruths they professed remain eternal even if humanhatred, greed and ruthless desire to subjugate
others prevented the permanent establishment of
the kingdom of neighborly love among humanbeings. Listening from a distance of thousands ofyears, we hear them speak of a loving, caring, kindGod, full of piety, who is truth itself. Their common
teaching erases the 2000 years that separate them.
So let us cast our eyes on Gudea's cuneiform
writings, here, within our theme: the search for the
Bread of Life.
Under no circumstances can we call coincidence
Gudea also calling bread "of heavenly origin" anddistributing it among the faithful of the church sothat the "strength of the Light may fill our souls:" Hesays:"'Bread is itself God,' then sprinkles it with thewater of life, breaks the bread, and exclaims to226the Mother Goddess: 'May the bread-giving
God be showered with prayer,' while he gives
everyone a piece of the bread."
Then, 2000 years later we hear Jesus say in John
6:51:
"Eat [this bread], it is my flesh, which I will
give for the life of the world"
In both cases, the message is that bread is adivine gift to Mankind that transforms into divine
strength.
Another divine substance is Water of Life, today's
Holy Water and the basis of a Hungarian Easter
ritual during which young men sprinkle water on themaidens of the village to promote life. Gudea openly
proclaims neighborly love; and here we can see theheirloom he left us, a statue of him holding thewellhead of the Water of Life in his hand. This is how
he teaches:"Your heart is the chalice of neighborly love, of
which it [neighborly love] should emanate as
the Water of Life flows from the cup in myhand."
Then, 2000 years later, Jesus teaches us in John
4:14:
"But whoever drinks of the water that I will
give him shall never thirst; but the water that I
will give him will become in him a well ofwater springing up to eternal life"227

In both cases—reference to Bread of Life andWater of Life—we have Jesus encouraging everyone,at the personal level, to come in direct contact with
228

God, to take God within himself. Yet nowhere in the
canonized scriptures do we find Jesus teaching us
personal awareness of the Son of God, ourimmediate relationship to God—that is, without anintermediary such as a priest—and the homogeneityof divine and human souls.
In that two millennia that stretches between
Gudea and Jesus, we find kingdoms that want toassure social welfare and happy civic life based onneighborly love, but alien cultures infiltrate these
kingdoms and replace notions of Bread of Life andWater of Life with their selfish ideologies. The
pitiless hatred and revenge ideology sweeps theland and defeats the law of neighborly love.
Conquered peoples are forced to worship a vengefulforeign god; their innocent newborns are massmutilated; and new, ingenious methods are devised
to exterminate entire populations that resist
conversion to Judaism. And at the moment, and inthat specific part of the world where such butcherlaws are at their peak, the Son of God appears andbegins to teach:"A new commandment I give to you, that you
love one another" (John 13:34).
Jesus really had to enact a new law because
neighborly love in Man's spirit has, to be sure,decayed seriously during the 2000 years since
Gudea.
229

Queen of Heaven
The oldest evidence of faith in a Heavenly Motherdates back some 7000-7500 years (radiocarbon
dating). The writings on an amulet found in
Tatárlaka, located in historical Hungary (Tataria,
Romania, since the Trianon Dictate of 1920) attests
to Man, struggling with adversity, petitioning the
Heavenly Mother for help. The prayer reads:"Protector of Tur-Dis (Tordos): Grand Lady,
cognizant of all secrets, may Your Caring Two
Eyes guard us in the light of our Father-Sun."

26 goddess figurines are also found next to theamulet, as testaments to the worship of the same
Mother Goddess. The people who live here regard
eternal divine care as the Heavenly Mother'skindness extended to everyone. This is their belief,the same belief the Scythians of Scythopolis, the“goiims,” “people of other faiths,” of Galilee profess.
Material testing confirms that the clay is of local
230

composition. As expected, the discovery of the
Tatárlaka religious artifacts, which predate even
Sumerian finds, have opened new debatesconcerning the beliefs of the people who lived there
and their relationship to the peoples history calls
Sumerians.
We find evidence of worship of the Mother
Goddess elsewhere, too. Uruk, Mesopotamia, is
Inanna's holy city where her worship is practiced at
the highest level, so let us dig around there. In our
search of the religious practices of an age, we look
for surviving symbols and interpret them using ourknowledge of that age. And so it is in the case of abird-headed goddess with child figurines found in
the antediluvian layers at the site of excavations ofUr, Mesopotamia. Here, we find the symbols of “sunworshipers,” people who symbolize an inconceivable
God by the sun. One is Im-Dugud, Tur-ullu, “NewLight” or “Child of Light” (L.144, 441), Turul, themythical falcon, symbol of Hungarian spiritual
identity. It is found everywhere; on ancient
Sumerian artifacts, 1st century Parthian royalcrowns, Atilla's banners, Árpád's standards, and on
the Hungarian military coat of arms, emblems,badges and decorations to this day. The othersymbol is the lion, "House of the Sun" in theSumerian zodiac. We can confirm the relationshipbetween the lion and the Virgin Mother by231

identifying the Rosetta worn by the Scythian Virgin
Mother with that on the lion's flank in the sanctuaryof Ister-Gam castle (Esztergom, pre-14th century
capital of Hungary on the shores of the Danube[formerly Ister] river). During the Marxist terror
rule of Béla Kun (born Jewish, Khon), the Basilica of
Esztergom is "vandalized," and of the seven pairs ofLions of Ister-Gam, thirteen are scraped off by"unknown perpetrators;" that is, perpetrators who
know the meaning of these symbols, but are tasked
to destroy evidence of the Queen of Heaven-Virgin
Mother-Innana-Ilama-Mary faith.

2500 BC composite titled Tur-Ullu depicting the
combined symbols, Turul and Lion, “Child of Light in
the House of the Sun.” The stags represent Nib-Ur's(Nimrod) sons (peoples), Hunor and Magor(Hungarian mythology)232

15m. (49 ft.) wing-span copper statue of the Turul in
Tatabánya, Hungary

233

Lions of Eszergom. (Esztergom is located some
15km. from Dobogókő, site of the phenomenon
variably translated as Beating Heart Stone [ancient
Hungarian faith], and Earth Heart Chakra [the 14th
Dalai Lama]).
The Queen of Heaven is the main character ofSumerian spirituality. She is the Holy Innana, Gingir
Ilama (Tündér Ilona; Tündér, Hungarian for Fairy).
She is also called the number 40 in memory of her

234mystical resurrection after forty days. Hence, hername is also written as Nin. Her symbol is four
cuneiform wedges, the number forty, which is stillvisible on the body of the lion of Esztergom.
Our most accessible source that speaks of the
Heavenly Queen is the Bible. Here, in the Book of
Jeremiah, we hear courageous Semites rejecting
Jeremiah's Judaism and new god, Yahweh:"As for the message that you have spoken to
us in the name of the Lord, we are not going tolisten to you! But rather we will certainly carryout every word that has proceeded from ourmouths, by burning sacrifices to the Queen of
Heaven and pouring out drink offerings to her,just as we ourselves, our forefathers, our kingsand our princes did in the cities of Judea andin the streets of Jerusalem; for then we had
plenty of food and were well off and saw no
misfortune. But since we stopped burning
sacrifices to the Queen of Heaven and pouringout drink offerings to her, we have lacked
everything and have met our end by the sword
and by famine. 'And,' said the women, 'when
we were burning sacrifices to the Queen of
Heaven and were pouring out drink offerings
to her, was it without our husbands that we
made for her sacrificial cakes in her image andpoured out drink offerings to her?'" (Jeremiah235

(44:16-19).
Who could be this deity the Semites of Jeremiah'stime revere when they reject Judaism and the new
Jewish god, Yahweh? Where does this reverence,found in the remnants of their folklore as "ourforefathers," originate? According to professional
literature (Masoretic Text, Targum), the Queen of
Heaven is also portrayed as the Star of Heaven. But
in that case, the reference is to Istar, Venus,
Morning Star. In Mesopotamia, she is known as
Innana or Ninana; in Egypt, Isis; in Carthage, Tanit;
and to the Turanian people, her name is Ana-Hita.
She is the Greek Demeter, Aphrodite; the Roman
Minerva and Venus. To followers of the Jesus Faith,
she is Mary, Jesus' mother, who has been since
eternity, the incarnation of the Virgin of Light who
took part in the great Creation; just as her son, Jesus
is the incarnation of the Son of Light. Hence, theMother from her Son, and the Son from his Motherare inseparable.
To Hungarians, since time immemorial, she is
knownas"Boldogasszony.""Our
MotherBoldogasszony”: this is how Hungarians petition
their Heavenly Mother. And, by Boldogasszony,
everyone means Jesus' Mother, Mary. Ida Bobula, in
her discussion, Ősvallás Istenasszonya, proves fairly
well that the Hungarian people already had their
Boldogasszony long before conversion to the Roman236

religion, and that, on the recommendation of bishop
Gellért, Stephen I orders that Boldogasszony be
Mary. And that is just fine, because Jesus' Mother isthe Heavenly Boldogasszony incarnate, and because
the Roman religion likewise considers her Queen of
the Heaven and believes in Mary, a Virgin Mother,just as she is the goddess of the ancient Sumerian
faith. (Note: Translation of the compound word
Boldogasszony (boldog: blissful) and Istenasszony(Isten: God) is difficult because no English
equivalent exists for asszony, a word for a woman ofthehighestsocialstature.
Customarily,
Boldogasszony is translated as Blessed Lady, Our
Lady, Notre Dame, Madonna, and so forth.)
Even Christian Catholicism has not been able tocompletely erase her divinity from people's
consciousness despite Church efforts to turn her
name, “Morning Star,” into Christianity's demon,“Fallen Angel,” Lucifer, whom it identifies with
Judaism's Satan. (Lucifer [Light-bringer] is the Latinname for "Morning Star," both in prose and poetry,
since, at least, Varro Reatinus [116–27 BC], Cicero[106-43 BC] and other early Latin writers). The
Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary (Loreto) stillcontains the line, "Morning Star pray for us." And
we read in 2 Peter 1:19: ”...until the day dawns andthe Morning Star rises in your hearts.” And Mary isusually depicted standing above the crescent moon237

—though the praying faithful no longer knows why—symbolizing Archmagus Gabriel's Annunciation, “theMorning Star above the crest of the New Moon thatshines beneath her feet.” And this seems to be an
accurate portrayal of the Virgin Mary, since both
Innana incarnate and the Parthian Queen of Heaven
are associated with the crescent moon.

238

Patrona Hungaria associated with the lion symbol (7lions on her shield)
239

Scythian-Hungarian Anahita, Boldogasszony, Virgin
Mother, Mary, Protector of Mothers. Folk art.

240

Mary, Morning Star, standing above the crescent
moon.
241

Early Sumarian “written” communication reliedheavily on symbolism (logograms—also known as242

ideograms or hieroglyphics—and phonograms) toconvey thoughts. Above, the antediluvian (6thmillennium BC, or earlier) statue of the falconheaded woman with child is read, “Mother of theChild of Light” (variably, “Mother of the New
Light”). Popularized creative—often fantastic—
interpretations of the ancient Sumerians' spirituality
are either the products of imagination born out of
ignorance of this culture-specific “written language”
or deliberate disinformation.

243

Jesus' life and crucifixion
There is, no doubt, much more to be learned andsaid about Jesus. We do not even know his real
name, other than Prince Adiabene. We have only
callings such as Light of the World, Divine Wisdom,
Magus, King of kings, Prince of Bethlehem, Son ofLight, Son of God; and the Jews' callings, Galilean,
Samaritan and Nazarit (Holy Man). Nor do we knowmuch about his life before his ministry. Some
speculate that, as a youngster, Jesus studies in
Scythopolis, in “my Father's house” (quoted phrasefrom Luke 2:49) then, later, travels to Egypt, India
and Tibet, and also spends time among the so-called
Essenes in Palestinian Syria (Philo). Using whatmaterial fragments we have (e.g., Arabic Gospels),
we can theorize that his Scythian magi professors
from the Sippar Institute of Astronomy at
Scythopolis (in today's language) are monitoring his
progress. When they test their 12-year-old student's
knowledge of the heavens, they are “amazed” by his
detailed and precise analyses of the heavenly bodies,
their number, nature, coordinates—right ascension
and declination—broken down to 8, 6 and 4-hour(1/3, 1/4, 1/6) intervals, planetary velocity variations
and their retrograde motions, and cosmic
relationships that "no human mind can track," andmuch else, knowledge, "no human mind can behold."244

Luke (2:41-52) reports this event, but reworks its
details and throws in a few irrelevant “justifiers” tobring it in line with Judeo-Christian dogma. He
claims that the event takes place in “the temple” inJerusalem implying that the “teachers” quizzing
Jesus are Jews. However, these claims are not evenplausible because the Jews had neither astronomers
nor institutes of astronomy, in Jerusalem or
anywhere else. Therefore, Jesus' teachers could nothave been Jews, nor could the event have takenplace in Jerusalem or anywhere else in Judea.
We also know from the apocryphal Acts ofThomas the story (later, Hymn of the Soul [alsoPearl], sometimes attributed to the Parthian,
Bardaisan of Edessa) of a certain boy, “Son of theKing of Kings”—the name by which the magi called
the newborn Jesus—who relates:“When I was a young lad, and dwelling in mykingdom, in my father's castle, and wascontent with the wealth and the luxuries of mynourishers, from the East, our home, myparents equipped me and sent me forth.”[“East, our home” can refer only to Parthia
because the Parthian Empire stretched all theway to India.]
Egyptians have always maintained close ties with
the Sumerians, and Tibetan and Indian monks alsoteach divine energy in Man and peaceful245coexistence. We do not know who the “monks”
called Essenes are. This word appears as the Greek
essaioi, holiness [Philo], and as esseni in Latin texts[Pliny], but these people never refer to themselves(in the Dead Sea Scrolls) by such name. What we doknow is that they live north of the Dead Sea, today's
occupied West Bank; seek knowledge from the same
source as the magi, namely, the “Book of Heavens”;
and vehemently oppose the Jews' immorality,
especially their sacrifice-ideology rituals. There issome evidence they are Aithiops. They time andorient their morning prayers to the rising sun(Plinius) in accordance with the practices ofChrestos (Sun-God) faith—the faith the Jewish
Church Father, Epiphanius, later curses as“Christianity's archenemy.” Once again we canhypothesize that Jesus' travels to Egypt, India, Tibet
and elsewhere are part of his research or teachingassignments—though, for now, we do not have thepieces to construct this puzzle.
All these hypotheses are plausible and worth
researching. But for the time being, we must becontent with what we have, and move on to examine
events leading up to and following Jesus' crucifixion.
The term that best defines Jesus' torture anddeath is satanic cult-style ritual killing. When we
examine the events surrounding Jesus' trial, tortureand crucifixion, we need to keep three facts in mind:
246

1. Roman authorities grant the Jews jurisdiction
only over Judean Jews and only in Jewish
religious matters. Since the Jewish highpriests, Caiaphas and Annas, do not consider
Jesus either a Jew or a Judean, they argue that
Jewish religious laws apply to everyone in
Judea, including foreigners (other than
Romans). Pilate, however, disagrees and, since
he does not find evidence of Jesus breaking
any Roman laws, refuses to have him
executed.
2. During Jesus' time, executions in Judea arelawful only by order of the civil authority who,
in Jesus' case, is Pilate. Pilate, however, does
not order Jesus' execution. Therefore, killing
Jesus is an unlawful act. And since the act is
intentional, it is murder. Further, since themurder is planned, it is premeditated murder.
3. Church dogma claiming that it was the
Romans who crucified Jesus is untenable. It
would be suicidal for soldiers in any army toex-office execute a civilian, especially inpeacetime, without signed orders. Such
breakdown of discipline is unthinkable in the
Roman Legions, especially on the part of a
Tribune (roughly equivalent to a Colonel—
elected by the Council), as propagated by the
Church. Condoning such behavior would turn247

soldiers into an uncontrollable mob. And since
Pilate does not sign any order of execution, no
Roman soldier in his right mind would takepart in the events that follow. That leaves thepermanent mercenary guards of the Temple ofJerusalem as the only armed personnel who
could have carried out Jesus' unlawful tortureand killing.
To put the Jews' actions against Jesus—and his
followers—in perspective, it is important to look at asampling of the Jewish laws the high-priests of the
Temple of Jerusalem (Annas' relatives during Jesus'
ordeal) enforce. Professor Ethelbert Stauffer hascollected and cataloged these laws under the title
Die jüdishen Ketzergesetze, "practices" enacted forthe preservation of the authority of the Torah andthe Great Sanhedrin of Jerusalem, the supreme
enforcer of Jewish law. The following excerpts(actual Article Numbers shown) give an insight into
the kind of terror people under Jewish laws are
subjected to, not only as individuals but also as
entire populations:"3. Whoever, following a reprimand andwarning, continues to disobey the regulationsof the Torah, must be condemned to death andstoned.""4. Whoever questions the divine origin of the
Torah must be burned to death."248

"5. Disobedience of a rabbinic decree(Halacha) is punishable in the same way as
opposition to the Torah.""39. A proclaimer of false doctrine (trashpreacher) is a child of 'Baal' who wants to takepeopleinto
ungodlinessby systematic
agitation.""40. In legal actions against such 'trashpreachers,' humane treatment, applicable inother cases, is prohibited.""42. A 'defector city' is a city, town or village
community that organizes a movement todefect on a grand scale following agitation bya preacher of false doctrine.""44. In all cases, the originators are to beconsidered 'false prophets' and must be stoned
to death. Their wealth and properties are to beburned.""48. The guilty shall be stoned to death andtheir heirs shall inherit their properties.""49. However, if the number of defectors
exceeds
halfthepopulation,
thenextraordinary action against the masses isnecessary. Every inhabitant of the city shall be
put to the sword, killed by sword, and the city
itself, along with all its wealth and properties,
shallbeburnedtoashes,
andits
reconstruction is to be forever prohibited."249

"50. Applicable to 'defector cities:' Suchpunitive measures are to be considered as'burning sacrifices to God.'""51. The ordinances applicable to such'defector cities' shall also apply, in all respects,
to 'defector tribes.'""55. A 'false-prophet' must be condemned by
the Great Sanhedrin and must be executed in
Jerusalem.""77. The execution of 'the ungodly' is thehighest form of glorification of God."
The above are but a sampling of the butcher-laws
the Jews are enforcing against Jesus and his people.
We can now understand why Jesus leads his fold tomountain tops and lake shores to teach and to
perform miracles. He knows that Jewish agents arewatching him, so he takes the necessary steps tomake sure these infiltrators and informants would
not be able to prove the identities of the defectors orthat of their towns among the large, curious masses,
many of whom come from Judea.
The timing of Jesus' crucifixion is reported to beof utmost importance to the high-priests of the
Temple of Jerusalem. To understand why they wantto kill Jesus on a specific day and time of day, it isnecessary to look into Judaism and its sacrificeideology. Whenever Jews sin, they offer sacrifices totheir god by ritually slaughtering animals.
250

Depending on the occasion, they collect the animal's
blood in a ceremonial chalice and either sprinkle iton the altars of their god or use it to paint the door
posts and lintels of their houses and business asprotection from their god's killer-angels. For
everyday use, they maintain a supply of pigeons tomeet the demand generated by the sins of the Jewry,
but on important religious “holy days,” they butcher
lambs. One such “holy day” is the Jewish Passover.
Every year, on the 14th day of abib (variably, aviv,
Nisan), Jews celebrate their god's supposed
massacre of the Egyptians' firstborns (Note: No
records exist of such event) by slaughtering male,“unblemished” lambs (Paschal Lamb) on the eve ofPassover at precisely 3 pm. In the year of Jesus'
death, celebration of the Passover is to be an
extraordinary event. That year, the ritual slaying
includes not just ordinary male, “unblemished”
lambs, but also another, more spectacular male,“unblemished” lamb, the son of the “Ram” (Kus)people, progeny of the “despised” (by Jews) Nib-Ur(Nimrod). Jewish laws, however, forbid Jesus' swift"slaughtering" because that would amount to“humane treatment,” which is prohibited by Article
40. This Article implicitly requires that Jesus be
tortured to death. Accordingly, the timing andintensity of his torture has to be orchestrated tobring about his death at 3 pm. And that is how it is251reported to have happened (Mark 15:34: “ninthhour”—keeping in mind that around the time of the
March equinox the day begins at 6 am). It is also
reported that Jesus is stabbed with a spear (John19:34) and, according to legend, one of the judges of
the Great Sanhedrin, Joseph of Arimathea, collects
the blood pouring out of Jesus' stab wound in a
ceremonial chalice (It should be noted that theindividual identified here as Joseph of Arimathea isbased on legend only. Some scholars maintain that
he was a member of Jesus' following. If this is true,
then he could not have been present at Jesus'
crucifixion [no males were permitted at executions
and none are listed by John] and, therefore, anycollection of Jesus' blood for the Jewish ritual would
have been someone else's doing). In compliance with
Article 77, killing Jesus is the highest form ofglorification of the Jews' god, a spectacle pleasing
enough to earn the Jews forgiveness of all their sins.
This is the source of Judeo-Christianity's dogma:“Lamb of God whose blood washes away the sins of
the world”—more precisely, the sins of the Jews.
The similarities between the Jewish Passover
ritual and Jesus' crucifixion are too great to callcoincidence. There can be little doubt that the judgeof the Great Sanhedrin in charge of the crucifixion,
realizing that it is 3 pm and all the lamb are beingslaughtered, orders one of the guards of the Temple
252

of Jerusalem to stab Jesus with a spear, and thedesignated “sochet” to collect Jesus' blood in a
ceremonial chalice, in accordance with bloodletting
rituals practiced by orthodox Jews to this day.
There is ample literature on these horrific Jewish
religious practices to seekers of the truth. Ariel
Toaff, Israeli historian, Bar Ilan University, deals
with them extensively in Bloody Passovers: The Jews
of Europe and Ritual Murders. Also, the famous
expert on religions, Alfonz Luzsanszky list 77 ritual
bloodletting murders in Europe in The Talmud in
Hungarian. The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia,
New York, 1970, p. 326 mentions 42 cases during
the 19th century and 5 cases up until the middle ofthe 20th century. The 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia—
though it denies this practice—mentions no fewer
than 122 “most notable” cases, 39 in the 19th
century (p. 261). A truly heartrending case is that of
the ritual murder of a 14-year-old “goiim virgin,”
Solymosi Eszter of Tiszaeszlár, Hungary, whodisappeared as she walked by the Jewish Orthodox
Synagogue on her way home from Kohlmayer's
general store around 12 noon on the eve of theJewish Passover, April 2, 1882. This vicious crime
has provoked international outrage. Her martyrdom
became the subject of many books; and her case is
yet to be resolved. Eszter was last seen walking
down the street towards the synagogue (according253

to eyewitness testimonies). A gruesome account of
the ritual murder by bloodletting was given inminute detail by two eyewitnesses, five-year-old
Samuel, and fourteen-year-old Moric, sons of thesynagogue sexton, Joseph Scharf. The examining
judge, Bary József, recorded the youngsters'
testimonies on May 19th. Samuel testified that his
father, Scharf József, cut the little girl's neck while
his older brother, Moric, collected her blood in abowl. Fourteen-year-old Moric, however, testified
that slaughterers Abraham Buxbaum and Leopold
Braun had held the little girl while anotherslaughterer, Salamon Schwarz, incised her neck witha large knife and drained her blood into a pot, andthat the ritual took place in the presence of Samuel
Lustig, Abraham Braun, Lazar Weisstein, and Adolf
Jünger. On July 29, the following Jews living in
Hungary were arrested: Salamon Schwarz, Abraham
Buxbaum, Leopold Braun, and Hermann Wollner
were charged with murder; Joseph Scharf, Adolf
Jünger, Abraham Braun, Samuel Lustig, Lazar
Weisstein, and Emanuel Taub, with voluntary
assistance in the crime and; Anselm Vogel, Jankel
Smilovics, David Hersko, Martin Gross, and Ignac
Klein, with abetting the crime and smuggling thebody. The district bailiff placed Moric Scharf in thecustody warden Henter.
In August 1883, just before the Court was to254announce its verdict, Count Joseph Degenfeld had
invited the presiding judge, Korniss Ferenc, to his
castle for a “friendly supper.” Arriving at the castle,
Korniss finds himself face to face with an
unexpected guest, another vassal of Franz Joseph I,
Emperor of Austria (who also ruled Hungary), Tisza
Kálmán, the liberal prime minister of Hungary. Aftersupper, the prime minister asks Korniss about the
Court's opinion on the Tiszaeszlár sochets' [Jewish
slaughtermen] guilt. Korniss replies he is “convinced
they are guilty.” “What about the voting judges,” theprime minister asks? “One is of the same opinion as
I, guilty, the other is still undecided,” Korniss
replies. Istóczy Győző records the prime minister's
words to the presiding judge, Korniss Ferenc (tract
no. 12, sourced from Megyery Ella and Megyery
Géza, Korniss' daughter and grandson):“Look, Mister President. Tomorrow, the day
after, or at any time, you can announce thejudgment imposing the death penalty for the[Tisza]eszlár sochets. I don't want to influenceyou. I am only bringing to your attention, that
the Viennese Rothschild counts have informed
even His Highness that, if the Nyíregyháza
judgment produces a conviction, they will notgrant the sixty million Forint [Hungariancurrency] rente-conversion [extension to pay
the interest on a loan]. In this case, the255Monarchy—and certainly Hungary—will go
into bankruptcy. The Forint will loose its value.
The nobility will revolt. Do you want to accept
this responsibility, Mister President?”
During the trial, Moric Scharf told his father tohis face that he saw with his own two eyes what hehad done. But Eszter, justice and morality could notcompete against intimidation by the Jewry's elite,
the Degenfelds and the Rothschilds. All of theperpetrators were acquitted. Eszter's body wasnever found.
These are but examples of documented Jewish
ritual murders. Many more remain open cases—suchas that of 11 year old H. Zsófia who was found with
her neck incised and her blood drained just before
the 1998 Passover in Körmend (50 km. from
Tiszaeszlár), the region the wealthy American Jew,
Salamon Berkowitz, had "decreed"(!) earlier as "thenew homeland of Québec Hasidic Jews."

256Moral, legal and political fallout
Following Jesus' death, the mercenaries of the
Temple of Jerusalem, led by Rabbi Saul, begin theirhunt for Jesus' following. They go from door to door,
hauling off men and women alike, and subjecting
them to the most severe forms of torture to extract
information about Jesus' following. Jesus foresees
Rabbi Sauls draconian measures when he instructs
his disciples to deny him and to leave Jerusalem sothat they may live to spread his word. We read inActs 1:4, Saul's secretary, Luke claiming that Jesus
tells his disciples not to leave Jerusalem. However,when we read (the non-Jewish) Mark's account, wefind a "youth" (we now know as Mary Magdala)telling Jesus' followers just the opposite, that is, toleave Judea and go to Galilee:"But go, tell His disciples and Peter, He isgoing ahead of you to Galilee; there you willsee Him, just as He told you'" (16:7).
However, the purging continues for months until
news of the killing of a Parthian prince reaches
Rome.
We can search the canonized gospels in vain for
information regarding the fate of Pilate and thehigh-priests of the Temple of Jerusalem. Thesesources tell us nothing about what happened tothese individuals after their crime had become257

known to the Roman Emperor, Tiberius, a soldier(General) by profession and a man of integrity.
However, Pilate's File, one of the headings ofEvangelicos Apokrifos compiled by the Universidad
Pontificia
deSalamanca
contains
detailed
information regarding the fate of these criminals inTiberius' letter to Pilate (Editorial Catolica S. A.
Madrid, 1975. p. 474). Emperor Tiberius' letter to
Pilate (Delivered by a detachment of 2000 Roman
troops):"You have dared to unjustly force Jesus thenazarene to his death, without conviction you
gave him over to the insatiable angry Jews,
without any pity towards this man of truth, andaccepted gifts to deliver this man devoid of
any crime to the horrible agony of flogging andcrucifixion for doing so. Your tongue speaks ofsympathy but in your heart you have delivered
him into the hands of a few unlawful Jews.
For all these, you shall be brought before me
in chains so that you may give an account of
this life which you have given over to death forno reason, and so that you may save yourself
with your excuses. This is the reality of yourshame and your indifference. Since I havebecome aware of your atrocities, my soul issuffering and I can find no inner peace. His
258

wife, who was also his disciple, has come tome [in the Coptic version] and has proven that
this Jesus healed the sick wherever he went.
He gave eyesight to the blind, he made thecripple walk, he gave back the deaf their
hearing, he cleansed the lepers; and all thesecures he did with no more than his words.
How could you have permitted his crucifixion,
since he was innocent? If you did not receive
him as God, you could have at least received
him as a healer. He is much greater than anyof the gods we revere. Your own deceitfulwriting to me has condemned you.
Take note: I shall deal to you, youraccomplices and those who bribed you asmuch justice as the injustice you dealt out tothis benefactor. "Tiberius' orders were to shackle Pilate, Caiaphas,
his father-in-law, Annas, and all the other highpriests of the Temple of Jerusalem and theiraccomplices, and bring them to Rome.
Thus, Tiberius is the only authority who considers
Jesus' torture and crucifixion not only a crime andan unjust act, but the greatest crime against
humanity. He is so jolted by the gravity andviciousness of this crime, he sentences even his own
259

son-in-law, Pilate, to death, along with the otherperpetrators, and has them all executed. (According
to some legends, Caiaphas dies on the way to Romeon or near the island of Crete, but the earth[variably, the sea] “rejects his corpse.”)Even if Tiberius were not a just and righteous
man, a plausible consideration in his decision topunish these criminals is political stability. Keeping
in mind that the Parthians had soundly defeated the
Romans several times in the recent past, gained
control of large parts of Palestine, and killed
Crassus, Tiberius may have had good reason to fearthat the Parthians might interpret the killing of amember of the Adiabene Royal Family as a Roman
political assassination, and severely punish Rome.
This plausibility raises new questions: how does
Mary Magdala, a supposed "prostitute" a "Jewish
carpenter" met in passing—according to thecanonized gospels—get to see Tiberius? How is sheable to get anywhere near Rome, the city—not tomention the person, Rome's Emperor—without
proper documents since she is not a Roman citizen?
Even as Jesus' spouse, she could turn only to the
local civil authority with her grievance—accordingto Roman code of procedure in personal matters.
However, in this case, her complaint is against thehead of the local authority and his accomplices, so
she has to go over Pilate's head. But how does a260

commoner—and of the lowest social class at that—from a far away Roman-occupied territory getanywhere near the ruler of a world power and gain
audience regarding a personal matter? Pilate is thesole authority to issue a passport for non-citizens toenter Roman territory. However, in his letter toTiberius, Pilate makes no mention of his awarenessof Mary's travel to Rome, so he could not haveissued her such a passport. Therefore, Mary musthave traveled to Rome under some other authority.
To answer these questions, we need to turn tohistory once again.
There is relative piece between the Parthians andthe Romans during Jesus' time. Edessa is probably(see below) one of the capitals of the Kingdom of
Adiabene where King Abgar V rules (13-50 AD). (InGutschmidt's chronological list of kings of Edessa,
the king listed after Abgar VI [71-91 AD], Sanaturk[91-109 AD], is explicitly called "King of Adiabene.")Eusebius tells us that "Abgar V, King of Adiabene,
writes a formal reprimand to Emperor Tiberius
demanding explanation of Pilate's audacity to allow
the Jews to crucify Jesus" (Hist. Eccl. I. 13-15).
Moses Chorenei completes Eusebious' information
with the following documentation:"King Abgar established a huge library in
Edessa, and had his library from the Church of
the Sun of Nisib shipped here, too... Here,261

among other correspondence, he had kept thepair [copy] of his letter to Tiberius he had
written in regards to Jesus' acts and Divinity”(History of the Armenians, Par. 2.k, 10, 37).
Based on our knowledge of Roman laws, thepolitical climate and the above documents, we canhypothesize that:
1. Abgar, as King of Adiabene, informs Tiberiusof the Jews' atrocity and of his discovery of theidentities of the criminals responsible forJesus' crucifixion. Based on this information,
Tiberius demands Pilate's explanation of theevents, a demand Pilate fulfills in Pilate's
Letter to Tiberius which, in turn, prompts
Tiberius to arrest Pilate, the high-priests of the
Temple of Jerusalem and their accomplices.
2. Abgar certifies Mary Magdala as Jesus'
spouse. She personally protests Jesus' killingto Tiberius.
3. The only way Mary Magdala could have
traveled to Rome and be received by Tiberius
is as a member of a diplomatic delegation
arranged by King Abgar in accordance withexisting diplomatic protocols.

262

Shroud of "Turin" and Simon Magus
Another thread that leads to Edessa as theprobable capital of Adiabene during and after Jesus'
time is in itself worth investigating. Following Jesus'
resurrection—or, for the nonbeliever, disappearance
from his tomb—his mother, Mary, takes the cloth her
son is wrapped in on a journey into history. The"Shroud of Turin," as it is generally known, has
generated enough interest to almost rate a field of
research of its own. Heated debates continue to thisday over the authenticity of this cloth, which begins
its journey as the Shroud of Edessa centuries before
its "discovery" in 1357 (See also the illustration ofJesus' burial, Pray Codex, National Library,
Budapest, Hungary. The shroud, its unusual
weaving, and an L-shaped patch near the hands thatmatches the relic, details recorded in 1192-95,
disproveany
14th
century“discovery”
ormanufacture claims). This cloth is known as the
Cloth of Edessa, named after the ancient royal
capital of Adiabene, where it is held from shortly
after the time of Jesus until the year 944. The crucial
insight that the Cloth of Edessa and the Shroud of
Turin are one and the same was made only recently
by Ian Wilson, who published his investigation in
The Blood and the Shroud in 1998. His bookincludes a detailed chronology, and many of the263

facts below originate from his work.
Eusebius, gives us an account of the early historyof the Cloth of Edessa in his work Ecclesiastical
History written around 325. He tells how the king of
Edessa, Abgar V, hears of Jesus' ministry, and sends
Jesus a letter asking him to come and heal him.
Eusebius found this letter in the Library of Edessa,
and he quotes from it verbatim. He also relates
Jesus response, which is that he could not comebecause he had to complete all that he had been
sent to do. Jesus however assures the king that a
disciple will be sent to the king, after his (Jesus')
death, to bring about his healing. According to
Eusebius, the public records at Edessa identify thatdisciple as Thaddeus, one of the “seventy, whobegan in the power of God to cure every disease andweakness, to the astonishment of everyone.”
Eusebius does not mention a cloth bearing theimage of Jesus, but other early traditions recounthow such a cloth is brought to the king of Edessa toheal him. Grant Jeffrey, in Jesus: The Great Debate,notes, “History reveals that this city became astronghold of the early Christian Church in the
centuries following Abgar.” There are numerous
ancient church paintings and even images on coinsthat depict the face of Jesus on a cloth being
displayed in ancient Edessa.”
So how does the cloth Jesus was wrapped in get
264to Edessa? According to early traditions, it isbrought there by Thaddeus, a probability supported
by paintings, and images on coins depicting Jesus'
face on a cloth, of that era. We also know from theChristian priests' breviary that Thaddeus and his
brother, Simon the Canaanite meet in Persia.
However, since Persia does not exist in the days of
the apostles, the gospels correct this mistake byredefining this meeting place as the land of:"Parthians and Medes and Elamites, andinhabitants of Mesopotamia..." (Acts 2:9-10).
An extensive examination of such works as thoseundertaken by Western researches published under
the title The Kingdom of Adiabene and Hatra andothers, lead us to hypothesize that Mary, Jesus'
mother takes the shroud first to Hatra, a Parthiancity where a huge church of the Magi Faith, hadbeen erected, and that it is from here that she takes
it to Edessa, accompanied by Mary Magdala, Simon
the Canaanite and his brother, Thaddeus. Therefore,
it is very likely that King Abgar considers thedelegation fulfillment of Jesus' earlier promise to
send his disciple to heal him. Further, the sight ofthe shroud may have convinced him of Jesus'
divinity. In any case, it seems important to look into
the identity of an oft-mentioned yet mysterious
member of this delegation, Simon the Canaanite.
It is an understatement to say that the Simons265

associated with accounts about Jesus are difficult to
identify and follow. We know of at least four Simons.
One is the father of the Jewish infiltrator, Judas.
Another is Lazarus' father. Still another is Jonah'sson, the disciple Jesus named Peter, the "rock" uponwhich the Church of the Jesus Faith he is to found.
Finally there is Thaddeus' brother, Simon the
Canaanite. Considering Jesus' foresight, wisdom andgood common sense, it is understandable that if hehas two Simons, he would have to rename them todifferentiate one from the other. And what betterway to do so than by calling them according to their
future assignments, or “callings”? We know that
Simon Peter's calling is to found and lead Jesus'
Church12. So that leaves Simon the Canaanite's
assignment to determine. And here, the waters
really get muddy.
In Acts 8, the "holy" scriptures give quite a
confusing account of the activities of a certain
Simon. Of significance is that, according to thesescriptures, this Simon is practicing what the Acts
call "demonic magic" during the time Rabbi Saul isconducting his house-to-house search for Jesus'
following:
12 The word "peter" is the English variant of the Latin "petrus, perta," fromGreek, "petros, petra," rock, claimed to be the translation of Aramaic"cepha, cephas, kepha. kephas, kepa, kepas," stone, rock, bedrock.
Hungarian "kő, köves, kövesd" means stone or rock, rocky (place), bedrock,but "kövesd!" also means follow him!
266

"Saul began ravaging the church, entering
house after house, and dragging off men andwomen, he would put them in prison" (8:3).
Also, it is this same Simon, who "astonished theSamaritans with his demonic wizardry," and after
linking up with the apostle Philip, "Samaria hadtaken in God's verb." Luke also mentions Simon as
the one they call Zealot. This word, zealot, is
explained as meaning spirited. However, “zealot”
and “demonic magic” are represented in the Acts by
the same symbol, which also means magus. And
here, we reach a chapter in the history of
Christianity that could fill a library, a collection ofstudies under the title Simon Magus. But we havemore than just historical documentation: we have awhole series of legends that accompany thismysterious person. Reading the Acts, we cannot
help but ask, what exactly does this Simon do to"astonish the Samaritans"? What supernatural
powers does his "astonished" audience see in him?
How does he benefit from his supposed "practice of
demonic magic?" Is he a follower of Jesus, or is he ahypocrite or deceiver? What precipitates Peter's andJohn's success, upon their arrival, in distributing theHoly Spirit simply by "touch of hand"? And why isJohn a quiet and reserved observer during his
encounter with Simon Magus?
It is impossible to come to any logical conclusion
267

from this deranged account of events. So, the next
step is to look up Eusebius' account:"Simon instituted the greatest heresy, and his
followers, just as Morcion, too, rejected the
Old Testament which they consider writingsfrom the realm of evil" (Hist. II, 13. 1-8).
Yet, according to Justin:"All of Samaria practices the teachings ofSimon about Jesus" (Apol. 1:6).
According to these accounts, the Jews call Simona heretic, while Simon teaches the Samaritans about
Jesus, and his followers call the Jews' Old Testament“writings from the realm of evil.” So where do we gofrom here? Fortunately, we get a break in the
Dictionary of Christian Biography (IV. 1887. p. 681688), referencing George Salomon, in the Chapter,
Simon Magus. Here, he tells us that the discussion
between Peter and Simon related in the Acts of theApostles is actually a debate between Peter andPaul. Therefore, George Salmon identifies the man
the Acts call Simon Magus as Paul. And this is where
the cat gets out of the bag. It now becomes crystal
clear why Rabbi Saul changes his name to Paul,rather than some other name, to pass himself off asJesus' apostle. Jesus gives Simon the Canaanite thename “Pal” (Pál, Hungarian for Paul), a word thatdefines his calling. This word is a Sumerian symbol(the arrow) used to denote "calling" in reference to268the symbol it traverses. This symbol can be found in
the dictionaries of Deimel and Labat (9). Here is a
3rd millennium BC representation of this compound
symbol.

The symbol the arrow traverses is that of theHoly Trinity and, combined, the two symbols mean"advocate, teacher, guardian of the Holy Trinity."This is the assignment (calling) Jesus gives Simon
the Canaanite in their common native Aramaic
language. His job is to advocate, protect, guard theHoly Trinity.
It is also clear that Rabbi Saul finds it importantto spare no effort to establish the memory of Simon
the Canaanite as the "demonic Simon Magus." It isvital to Saul's success as an impostor to permanently
detach Simon from the name Pal. And to a great
extent, he succeeds. Roman Orthodoxy destroys all
the evidence of Simon's “Pal” name it can find,evidence that could undermine Saul's appropriationof that name. Henceforth, Saul can pass himself off
as Pal, Jesus' apostle by parroting off selected bits
and pieces of information he had extracted from
Jesus' captured following and from his informant(and possibly, brother) in Jesus' circle, Judas. In
substance, his identity-theft is a repeat of Jacob's
appropriation of the name Izrael to run a scam.
269

How Saul came to know about Simon's “Pal”
name remains a mystery. Conceivable theories
source this information from Judas who most likely
knew, or from Jesus' followers who broke under
torture. What is self-evident, is that he does notchoose just any name: he specifically takes on thename Pal, English Paul, and thus becomes thefounder of the new Jewish sect, an instrument ofsubjugation of Gentiles called Roman Christianity, all"in Jesus' name."
Rabi Saul's claim that he became a convert whenJesus appeared to him in a vision is as incredible toPeter as it is to the thinking man today. Put bluntly,
the disciple Jesus entrusted with founding his
Church calls the rabbi elevated to sainthood byJudeo-Christianity (Saint Paul) a liar to his face:"If, then, our Jesus appeared to you [Saul] in avision, made Himself known to you, and spoke
to you, it was as one who is enraged with anadversary; and this is the reason why it was
through visions and dreams, or throughrevelations that were from without, that He
spoke to you.
But can any one be rendered fit for instruction
through apparitions? And if you will say, 'It is
possible,' then I ask, 'Why did our teacher
abide and discourse a whole year to those who
270were awake?' And how are we to believe yourword, when you tell us that He appeared toyou? And how did He appear to you, when you
entertain opinions contrary to His teaching?
But if you were seen and taught by Him, andbecame His apostle for a single hour, proclaim
His utterances, interpret His sayings, love His
apostles, contend not with me who companiedwith Him. For in direct opposition to me, who
am a firm rock, the foundation of the Church,
you now stand. If you were not opposed to me,
you would not accuse me, and revile the truth
proclaimed by me, in order that I may not bebelieved when I state what I myself have heard
with my own ears from the Lord, as if I were
evidently a person that was condemned and in
bad repute.
But if you say that I am condemned, you bringan accusation against God, who revealed the[divine wisdom] Jesus to me, and you inveighagainst Him who pronounced me blessed on
account of the revelation. But if, indeed, youreally wish to work in the cause of truth, learn
first of all from us what we have learned fromHim." (Peter's reply to Saul, Clementine
Homilies, Pseudo-Clemens, 17:19).
271

Peter's reply not only reveals his disbelief ofSaul's fabrications but also says a lot about Peter. It
is self-evident that this articulate man possesses amuch higher education and level of thinking thanwould be expected of a simple fisherman, as
propagated by Judeo-Christianity. And whencombined with the organizational and administrativeskills needed to found Jesus' first Church, in Antioch(Acts 11:26)—and later, Babylon (1 Peter 5:13)—it ismore than probable that he was not only an
intellectual but also a magus himself (Antioch had
been under Roman control since 64 BC as a “civitas
libera” [“free city” in northern Canaan, today's
Turkey, near the Syrian border] inhabited by Greekspeaking non-Semitic people, followers of the MilkiIlu (Melchizedek) faith. The people of Antioch
receive Peter with open arms as Jesus' ambassador,but oust Rabbi Saul when he tries to spin his web of
deceit there. Despite good evidence of Peter's burial
in Antioch, the Church is still looking for him inRome, hoping to find some evidence to prop up its
untenable dogma. But so far, nothing has been foundto link Peter to Rome or to Judeo-Christianity).
During our investigation, we have also discovered
the theological meaning of the Pal-ian calling (his“call sign” if we like) as the advocate, guardian of
the Holy Trinity. We now understand Simon the
Canaanite's works Roman Orthodoxy attributes to272

Simon Magus: his teaching the Samaritans about theHoly Spirit and his followers' sourcing the Jews' Old
Testament from the "realm of evil." Moreover, we
can also see logic in Jesus' choice in sending Simon,
advocate of the Holy Trinity, to accompany the Holy
Spirit incarnate, Mary, Jesus' mother, to King Abgar.
Everyone, and Abgar, personally, realizes that
Mary's sacred touch produces miracles such as thehealing of the sick. History tells us that theincurable Abgar lives another twenty some years
after Mary's visit to a ripe age of 75.
We have no reliable information on the physicalappearances of Jesus as an adult, Mary, her parents
or any member of the Adiabene royal family—otherthan Jesus' (much-debated) image on the Shroud of
Edessa (Turin). The closest we can find are statues(in Hatra) of Jesus as a child (raised right handbroken), Adiabene's king, Sanaturk (91-109 AD) andhis wife (both from Girschman), the succession since
Abgar V (“The Great,” 13-50) being his son, Marina
V (50-57), Marina VI (57-71), and Abgar VI (71-91).
(The name Marina is read [by Badiny] Ma-Ri-Na,
literally, “Man of the Mother Goddess” from
Gutschmidt, 1876.) Nevertheless, these statues—
physical appearance, dress, the royal crown, theprincess' headgear, and hand sign—provide clues of
their physiques, traditions
and beliefs. Of
significance are the trousers—as opposed to robes,
273

the customary garment of other cultures—worn byboth the child Jesus and the king, the Turul (falcon)on the king's crown and the sun halo around both
Jesus' head and the “Son of Light,” in the princess'head ornament. The raised hand is a greeting sign ofopenness (the lines of the palm are believed toreveal ancestry, character and destiny). This custom
is still practiced in some isolated Magyar villages
when adolescents meet their dates. Later, the young
man proposes by showing both his palms. The girlthen “reads his lines” and, if she accepts him, covers
his palms with hers.

274

275

276

277

278

279

Matters of faith
The aim of this study was to introduce thehistorical Scythian, Jesus. Its purpose is to give
students of the Kus people's En-Lil incarnate, theParthian Magi's Son of God, the Scythians' Son ofLight, Mary Magdala's Light of the World, theJudeans' Holy Man, generally known as Izzu, divine
wisdom, Jesus, who refers to himself as Light, astable footing as they reach out to the limits ofcognition and beyond, into their innermost selves, insearch of their Creator, the source of self-awareness,
their calling and their prospects after earthly life. It
is hoped that portrayal of the historical setting andcultures of Jesus' time will help the reader gain theperspective he needs to understand the context inwhich Jesus spoke. What the study does not address
are the diverse theological interpretations andexplanations of Jesus' teachings advocated byvarious organized religions. An overview of two
relevant, diametrically opposed cultures, however,seems useful, here, as it reveals the background of
Jesus' message to humanity, then and now.
According to the wisdom of Jesus' Scythianancestors, Man's earthly life is but a stage of an
existence that stretches beyond the material world.
They reason that if Man's destiny were biologicaldeath, he would have neither need nor use for either
280the intellectual capacity to contemplate life after
death or for his awareness of such capacity. They
conclude that, since Man is aware of his interest in
this subject and of his capacity to entertain it, his
existence does not end with his earthly life. He
realizes that he is born ignorant of his Creator andthe purpose of his life on Earth but with a superior
intellect thirsting for such knowledge. He tries toquench his thirst by seeking his Creator to obtain
guidance to Man's role in the Universe.
However, the same intellect that drives Man toseek that knowledge also leads him to conclude that
he cannot even imagine the spiritual being called
God he is trying to contact. If he tries to imagine his
Creator, he fails because the mental faculty he isapplying—imagination—cannot produce an image ofGod. He realizes that everything Man imagines
derives from his sensory experience with just one
aspect of reality, the accessible (to him) physical
Universe. And if a phenomenon cannot be
experienced through the senses, then it cannot be
imagined. Therefore, if God is such a phenomenon,
then Man's attempt to picture God is bound to fail
(Whether reality extends beyond the physical
Universe is, of course, open to debate. But so far,nothing in our sphere of knowledge suggests that it
is limited to our world, a truth paraphrased,“absence of proof is not proof of absence”).
281

So how did Jesus' ancestors hope to get answers
from an entity they could not even imagine? The
magi's answer is, by using the right tool for the job.
Imagination is but one of Man's mental faculties,
they explain. He also has the ability to reason.
Although he cannot paint a picture of God, he canlearn much about his Maker through reasoning. But
for that, he must return to his point of departure andstart out on the right track. He begins by asking afundamental question about what he does know:
does his physical Universe have the ability to selfcreate? Since not even the most adventurous
thinkers have been able to prove such ability, heconcludes that it does not (Even today, so-called
Self-Creation of Cosmology [SCC] theories turn out
to be merely transformation theories: they fail toshow physical phenomena emerging from theabsence of physical phenomena). And if the physical
Universe cannot be its own cause, then it must be
the effect of an active cause which, for whateverreason, Man cannot explain. Therefore, rather thancontradict logic, a phenomenon in action beyond
humancomprehension
is
the
only
logicalexplanation for the existence of everything he does
know.
Here, he has already made headway in his searchfor his Creator. Although he still knows nothing
about God's nature, he is able to infer an energy282

acting on his known Universe. Next, he observescosmic manifestations, infers the activities andfunctions of this creative energy from his
observations, and applies the new knowledge toenhance his understanding of his Creator's nature.
During the millennia that cover the Sumerianculture, human migrations bring new beliefs andnovel interpretations of divinity. Each subculture has
its own notions about the Creator, an observation
paraphrased, “as are people, so are their gods.”
Some find God in nature; some put human faces on
their Creator; some see the Almighty in cosmic
manifestations exhibiting human attributes; andsome believe in an extra-terrestrial race of gods anddemigods. Although some do not believe in existence
beyond the physical Universe, most cultures include
belief in a being beyond Man's physical reach, anenergy inferred from cause-effect logic. Beliefs
about existence after death range from progressive
spiritual growth until the soul returns to its source,
the Creator, to enjoyment of rewards earned during
earthly life or torment by evil spirits as punishment
for “sins.” These beliefs then motivate Man to live
according a given set of principles to improve his
prospects in another realm after he dies.
To people of the Light, God is all of reality,
existence itself, a unique, benevolent energycomplex—physical energy, physics; life energy,283

biology; and mental energy, consciousness—
accessible to Man through direct contact with thedivine presence in him, his soul. They believe thatthe product of supreme intelligence and knowledgeof the complete reality (Truth) is divine wisdom,which radiates into and within Man as benevolence.
According to their faith, God is inferred from three
distinct divine activities. Creation, the maintenanceof existence, and the creation of life. Further, God isinferred from three divine functions that affecthumans specifically—and in the material world,
exclusively—as the distributor and caretaker of thesoul in created entities; giver of eternal life wholooks after Man's spiritual existence; and the sourceof eternal soul. These three functions are carried out
by one and the same entity playing different roles
simultaneously. The magi refer to God according to
the divine function, or role, they want to convey,
names to which Man can relate. They are Light(Father, Truth, Sun), Mother of Light (Virgin Mother,
Queen of Heaven, Mary, Morning Light), and Son ofLight (Son, Divine Wisdom, Bread of Life) (Asuggestion in this study to help understand therelationship between these three roles is to think ofLight as the sun, Mother of Light as the warmth of
the sun, and Son of Light as sunshine. This analogy
in not claimed to be sourced from the magi, though
they symbolize God by the sun). When the magi284

want to convey all three divine functions, they call
God Holy Trinity of Light. They also believe God cantake on any physical form, including incarnation andall forms of energy, anytime, anywhere and in any
number.
However, not all gods are revelations of Man's
sincere search for his Creator. We know of at least
two man-made gods, both fabricated by migrantHebrew tribes. One is Ea, who supposedly exercises
his divine powers exclusively through his earthly
priest-king “deputy” (Semitic Babylon). The other,
the god of the Jews, Yahweh, is the fabrication of agroup of influential Babylonian Hebrews who believethat all notions about a supernatural being are meresuperstitions, but that they can exploit Man's desire
to
seek
his
Creatortotheiradvantage.
Consequently, Judaism is an ideology, not a religion—though the vast majority of practicing Jews does
not know it. These atheist demagogues design—andredesign, as needed—a butcher-god for all to fear, avengeful immortal tyrant who retaliates against
mortal people with imaginative savagery if they dare
to disobey the orders he supposedly issues to thedemagogue to interpret and execute. This fabricated“jealous god” specifically forbids Man's search forthe truth and knowledge of right and wrong, andthereby guarantees the demagogue not only
absolute power as “God's exclusive earthly285

executive,” but also unchallenged authority inmatters of morality. These demagogues takeadvantage of ordinary Hebrews' difficulty withmattersofspirituality
byexploiting
theirvulnerability: ignorance of extra-cultural thinking
about divinity. They use the power of deception todisplace Man's notions about his Creator, if any,
replace them with their selfish ideologies, and invest
in perpetual disinformation to counter his naturaltendency to seek the truth. Once a sufficient number
of Hebrews are converted to the new ideology,“religion” becomes a weapon to assert thedemagogue's power within the group and to
subjugate or exterminate other peoples using his
terrorized victims as executors of evil deeds, doings
he then masquerades as righteous acts “ordered bytheir god.”
When adherents to such religions, doctrines
enshrined in “writings from the realm of evil," asSimon the Canaanite's followers put it, invade aculture based on peaceful coexistence, thentolerance for the aggressor's right to practice his“religion” becomes a moral dilemma for the people
under attack. On the one hand, they feel morally
justified to protect their culture with as much force
as needed. On the other, their morality frowns on
intolerance. So they have to choose. They can either
ignore the principle of tolerance their faith is286

founded upon and, de facto, practice theiraggressor's “religion,” or remain loyal to theprinciples of their faith and be overrun by theaggressor, in which case their culture, principles
and all, will be wiped out, along with its leaders, andreplaced by that of the aggressor.
That such a choice is difficult for the leadershipof a tolerant society is an understatement. The
leader tries to resolve his moral dilemma bycomparing the aggression to a home invasion. He
comes to the conclusion that the first responsibilityof the head of a household is his family's welfare.
Consequently, he is not only authorized but required
to repel an invader using all means at his disposal.
However, his reasoning alone does not lead to timely
decisions if the invasion is subtle and gradual. In theabsence of a trigger, he can neither identify the
point where intervention is morally justified—andrequired—nor decide on the degree of force to use.
Should a homeowner chase a perpetrator beyond
the front door? Should he launch preemptive strikes
to foil an impending attack, punitive measures todiscourage an aggressor from future attempts, or
preventive campaigns to eliminate a threat? So whatis the leader of a tolerant, peaceful society to do?
Unfortunately, reason alone does not generateanswers to such questions. Decisions of this natureneed guidance from another source.
287

5000-year-old Sumerian tablets mention an
earlier event, God giving Man the Tree ofKnowledge. Magus-kings seek answers to difficult
questions by regularly eating the fruit of this Tree,though we no longer know what this means inpractical terms. Available information suggests thatthey “read” the cosmos and, during altered states ofconsciousness induced through meditation, seek
knowledge of the divine plan for humanity, which
they believe is mapped out in the stars, a
relationship Jesus teaches in the Lord's Prayer (“onEarth as it is in Heaven”). All the king has to do is tosolemnly resolve to reign in accordance with thedivine plan his conscience dictates, despite any
lobbying, and to accept in advance that his decision
will be under divine guidance and that it is right. For
people of the Jesus Faith specifically, there is a bit
more help in this regard. One is Jesus'
encouragement—mentioned above—to not worry
about what to say—or by extension, decide—because, in the believer's hour of need, the Holy
Spirit will direct his thoughts. The other is apractical example to help shed the fog of doubt.
Jesus teaches neighborly love, yet scourges themoney-changers and peddlers of sacrificial animals.
However, he remains focused on his mission, anddoes not let this incident divert him from his cause.
He shows Man to seek, find and understand the288subtle difference between being principled andbeing rigid. This is the wisdom leaders faced withsuch moral dilemmas try to develop and adopt. They
commit to tolerate and respect beliefs founded onreciprocal tolerance and respect, but do not let
dogmatic rigidity limit their choices to pacificcapitulation and abdication of their responsibility totheir fold. They feel that the principles their faith isfounded upon would be useless to generations that
do not even know they exist.
However, they also feel that wars are not thesolution to every religious incompatibility. They notethat throughout history, people of different faiths
have lived peacefully side by side for centuries by
discoveringtheadvantagesofcooperative
coexistencefoundedoncommoninterests.
Peacefully, that is, until an outside agitator turns
neighbor against neighbor to advance its own
political agenda. The methods such agitators usevary from selective rewards to contracted
aggression to spark hatred. But their method of
choiceisdeception.
Theylaunchmassivedisinformation
campaigns—pointingoutandexaggerating differences to seed alienation,
fabricating and inflating reports of both unearned
rewards to fuel envy and unjust punishments toarouse self-sustaining vengeance, and various
divisive schemes effected by relentless repetition of289

lies—to create conflict between neighbors (Thismethod, the use of deception to manipulate Man tokill his brother has survived to this day and isenshrined in the Mossad's [Israeli Intelligence]motto: "By way of deception, thou shalt do war"). So
the leaders of tolerant societies try to avoid wars byencouraging people to seek the truth in the hopethat their search will expose deliberate deception
and thereby help maintain peace between different
religions.
But Man proves to be too naïve and lax. Alien
Semitic tribes, whether seeking economic refuge ordeported from neighboring regions are welcomed by
the Sumerian community where they are granted
freedom to live according to their own customs
while they adjust to their hosts' culture. However,the Hebrews, rather than adjust to their new
cultural environment, infiltrate the highest levels ofsociety and begin to spread their ideologies ofmaterialism, greed, hatred and vengeance within
their hosts' culture. In time, these humanweaknesses—primitive survival instincts which had
outlived their usefulness in spiritually affluent
societies—resurface and start to tear nations apart.
The introduction of this alien culture eventuallyreplaces the ancient value system based onhumanity's divine origin, and reduces Man to a slaveof ignorance and primitive instincts. The end of the2903rd millennium BC (Sargon's Semitic hegemony)marks the beginning of the Near East's spiritual andmoral decline.
The new ideology turns to hegemony throughout
the region and beyond after massive waves ofHebrew tribes start pouring into Sumer and takeover the economic and political spheres. Their king,Hammurabi (1792-1750 BC), legalizes religious
ritual prostitution (rape), cruelty and genocide;
experiments with novel methods to execute thedisobedient; and introduces the concept of landownership that turns free peasants into slaves.
Abortion becomes generalized when religious rapes
result in pregnancies which, despite severe
penalties for aborting the issue of a religious ritual,
the victims terminate by ridding themselves of theseeds of future parasites their assailants had
implanted by force. The Hebrews boast about theircruelty and genocide—and memorialize their deeds
on the reliefs on their palace—when their usurper
ruler, Tukulti-apal-esar, Tiglitpilesar (New Assyrian
Age), “erects mountains of human heads.” Before
Hammurabi's laws, all land “belonged” to God,administered by the king to the benefit of the people
for whose welfare the king had to answer to God.
Hammurabi “evicts” God and declares himself“proprietor” of the country. Laws require farmers tomaintain the irrigation system or get driven off the291

land. To pay for the work, the farmer has to take out
a loan at obscene interest rates and, when he cannot
repay it, the Hebrew money-lenders take possessionof the land and soon appear on the scene as richlandowners, while the farmer, the victim of the usury
scheme, has to sell himself (or members of his
family) to the money-lander as repayment of the
loan.
Whereas Man has always fought his neighbor forland and its resources, and often had to support theelite of his society, the Hebrew ideology ofenslavement changes the mandate of humanconflict, though the average man does not know it.
His combative nature, an instinct to assure hissurvival, is re-channeled from assuring the survivalof his family, clan, tribe or nation to securing
sustenance for an alien people. Unwittingly, Man is
no longer fighting to feed his family or to defend his
beliefs and way of life: he is now fighting to bringabout his own demise. Wars become a means toeliminate or subjugate nations that refuse to hostthe human parasite, the Hebrew or Jew. The
Canaanites have all but disappeared; and Celts, aswell as a vast number of isolated peoples east of the
Carpathians have all become (political) minorities intheir own homelands. The Kürts (Kurds) live
homeless on the borders of five different countries,
and the once influential Armenians have been292

squeezed into a space the size of a principality.
“Christian” Hungary's history is a trail of tears a
thousand years long. Ever since her people wereforced to deny the Light and kneel before theforeign god (or die), they have suffered theassassinations of their kings, killings of their magi,rape of their culture, genocide and foreign
occupation as their homeland is slowly morseled out
among worshipers of materialism on the altar of the
god of darkness.
Having lost their strength in numbers andunifying national identities, the politically enslaved
became easy victims of paralyzing stings that turnthem into spiritual slaves as well. (Here, we need toinsert a sidebar to address the difference between
political slavery and spiritual slavery. In John 8,
Jesus tells the Jews: “the Truth will make you free.”
The Jews, in apparent ignorance of the concept ofspiritual freedom, claim they are not “enslaved toanyone” [32-33]. They fail to understand that Man isborn spiritually free, but looses that freedom it hefalls victim of deceit, false information that grows
into false beliefs, delusions of the righteousness ofprinciples founded on lies. Political slaves are theirmasters' involuntary providers of material wealth:spiritual slaves are their masters' voluntaryproviders of power.) Prolonged political enslavement
erodes a people's culture, and replaces its beliefs
293with ideologies that serve the interests of thecontrolling regime (spiritual enslavement). The
erosion begins when a people's teachers fall under
the sword, the fire, the rope and modern killingmachines, and the sources of knowledge, the ancientscriptures that speak of Truth, which the magi havesafeguarded with their lives for the benefit of future
generations, are destroyed. Deprived of suchguidance and knowledge, the enslaved fail torecognize their master's “god” as a self-serving liar(“Your father... is a liar and the father of lies” [John8:44]), and his immoral deeds, doings he claims to
be executions of “divine orders,” as nothing morethan circular self-incrimination, a finger pointing
back at him because his god is nothing more than
the figment of his imagination, a non-entity he had
invented to “justify” his selfish deeds. For athousand years, Hungarian children, for example,
have been taught that their religious patriarch,Saint Stephen, gave their "barbarian idol-worshiping
pagan" ancestors “civilized Christianity.” Today, few
of them know that their so-called “pagan” beliefs
originate directly from Jesus' mouth relayed
personally by Peter, a faith they brought with themfrom Jesus' and Mary's Parthia and Peter's Antioch
and Babylon. And few of them know what atrocities
Rabbi Saul's “Holy” Church committed during SaintStephen's reign (and beyond), or how "civilized" was294the fire that roasted alive their intellectuals—scientists, teachers, midwives, pharmacists, healers,
the magi and the Táltos—at the stake. They proudly
recite the names of the saints the Árpád Dynasty
had contributed to Roman Catholicism, not realizingthat such royal saints as Margit and Kinga were
coerced into celibacy precisely because they would
be thus removed from Árpád's royal gene pool,which had safeguarded the Parthian-Scythian-MagiJesus Faith for a thousand years. Nor do they know
that, shortly after their historians record andillustrate, with minute precision, Jesus' burial in the
annals of their history (1192-1195 Pray Codex,
National Library, Budapest), the Roman Catholic
bishop, Calanus poisons their young king (Béla III
1172-1196). Albericus, a Cistertian (also spelled
Cistercian) monk writes in his Chronicle of theWorld: “Béla, the King of Hungary, died as he wastaking communion and there is suspicion that he
was poisoned by Calanus, the Bishop of Pécs.”László Botos' research supports Albericus' suspicion.
“[Bishop] Calanus was famous for his ability to mix
poisons and it is alleged that he killed the King witha holy host laced with poison” (the above from
László Botos, The Assassinations of the Kings of
Hungary, Selected Studies in Hungarian History,
2008, p.168). Deprived of their ancestors' wisdom,
Hungarians continue to bow their heads to this295

assassin's god, and endure the terror of the
Caiaphas inheritance.
Elsewhere in Europe, the extermination of Jesus'“pagan” following takes a different route. Unlike
their Hungarian counterparts, Western Europeankings escape religious assassinations by zealously
executing Church orders (formalized in 1179 at the
III Leteran Council: “All witches shall be burned at
the stake.”). While the Hungarian king, Kálmán
(“thebook-lover,”1095-1116)
tells
churchdignitaries, “Don't even mention witches, because
they do not exist”—and is later poisoned—Heinrich
III (Germany), trying to outdo Robert II (France)—
who, himself, has 13 “heretics” burned at the stakein Orleans in 1017—orders 24 “witches” to beburned at the stake in Golssar in 1051 (Radics,
Géza, 2008).
Royalty, nobility or peasantry, Gentiles aretrapped in webs of deceit everywhere. Since they
have no one to tell them they have been snared butthat everything they need to extricate themselves iswithin them, they continue to compete for a greater
share of wealth and power their master distributes
among his slaves, rather than ask their Creator for
wisdom to distinguish between right and wrong, andrealize that what they call their “free will” is but analien ideology planted in their minds:“'Indenture yourself to me,' sayeth the lords of296

establishment, enticing the talented: 'True,
you will be a servant, but to serve such masteras I is glory in itself; and in exchange for you
bowing before me, thousands will bow beforeyou. You will have no chores other than totorment these thousands according yourtalent; and from this light work you will
become rich.'”And so, Man, God's highest creation, “Man, whom
God created in his own image, Man who should be
looking into the sun, instead looks into the dust, as
though looking for worms, so he may learn fromthem how to crawl” (Quoted lines are from Petőfi,Sándor, Az apostol, 1848, paraphrased in freetranslation). He abdicates his free will every time hesolicits or accepts his masters' bribery and carries
out their evil deeds in the hope that the material
wealth and power they offer in exchange for his
freedom will assure his happiness during thatcosmic blink of an eye he calls lifetime. And he willremain enslaved for as long as he invests not in his
eternal self, but in the temporary materialistic world
his masters provide.
These are the cultures around Jesus' time andbeyond. Those guardians of the Jesus Faith whoescape death live in hiding to safeguard what
wisdom and knowledge they can recover fromarchaeological digs, historical records, linguistic297

research, traditions, folk art and other cultural
sources. Meanwhile, the god of slavery ensnares
Herod, Pilate, Heraclius, and others. Examples
abound. When their host, the Roman Empire
collapses, Jews look to other affluent societies forsustenance. They migrate east to Byzantine, andwest to the Frankish Kingdom (and later, to all ofEurope) where they feign servility, fawn on the local(Gentile) nobility, and execute the greatest fraud inEuropean history to bring about a political world
power subservient to Jewish interests, the Holy
Roman Empire. Jewish authority and supremacy
over this new world power is engraved in its symbol,
the Imperial Crown of the Holy Roman Empire. It
symbolizes the realization of the biblical kingdomsof David, Solomon and Hezekiah whose “pictures,”along with that of the Jewish prophet Isaiah,
constitute the bulk of its graphic symbols (the crossis added later). A direct supposed bloodline to Davidis symbolized by a picture of Jesus, not as teacher ofTruth, but as “a servant of circumcision” (Romans
15:8), progeny of the biblical Jewish king. Along withother engravings, such as the names of the Twelve
Tribes of Israel, this symbol is irrefutable proof thatthe new empire is meant to be the real version of thefictitious Old Testament Jewish kingdoms, ruled bypoppet kings and princes, as decreed by the Jews'
arrogant god in Proverbs 8: “Power is mine... By me
298

kings reign... By me princes rule.”
The fraud that has paralyzed the West was the
5th (8th) century hoax known as the Donation ofConstantine, part of the 5th (9th) century False
Decretals of Isidore, a collection of forgeries
fabricated by Jewish scribes and later collected by
Isidore Mercator, to appropriate Rome's power by
way of deceit. Purportedly issued by Constantine I,
the supposed document bestows all of Rome's power
to Pope Sylvester I and his successors. The text
claims that the “Donation” was Constantine's gift tothe pope for curing him of leprosy. However, during
the 15th century, Lorenzo Valla, Reginald Pecocke
and others, working independently, proved beyond
any doubt that this document was a forgery. For
starters, the quoted passages from the Bible werefrom the Vulgate translation, which did not exist
during the purported date of the document's writing.
This 5th century translation was the work of Jerome,
who was only born 20 years after the supposed
signing of this document. Then there is thevernacular Latin style of the text which did not exist
in the 4th century (classical Latin was the only stylein use). Also there are references to religious rituals
that did not exists in Constantine's time. Yet, despite
overwhelming evidence of the fraud founded on thisforgery, the West, in an apparent state of mental
paralysis, continues to bow to the fraudulent powers299

of the Church and its Jewish directors. In substance,
all laws passed in Western Europe since the 5th
century (751) are invalid. This forgery becomes the“justification” for the “legitimate” removal ofConstantine's legitimate heirs, the Merovingiankings, and the Church putting anyone it chooses in
power, or recall at will, in what is to become theHoly Roman Empire. From this point forward, theChurch exercises sweeping powers throughout
Europe. Every European ruler who comes to poweris crowned only under the authority of the Church.
This is how rabbi Saul's successors ensnare Gentile
kings and princes and gain control of Europe.
Yet, the ancient morality and Jesus' teachings
persist. By the 19th century, Jewish leadership feels
its grip slipping on the Gentile and becomesaggressively possessive. Karl Marx, a descendant ofa long line rabbis, proposes a new strategy tomaintain the Jewry's stranglehold on its hosts: erase
morality from human consciousness by attacking its
source, God. Packaged in a wrapper that appeals to
the masses (class equality), he proposes a new worldorder that would ban all beliefs in divinity, andreplace Man's source of morality by the god ofmaterialism. His plan is adopted and financed by thewealthy American (capitalist[!]) Jewry (Loeb, Khon,
Schiff, Rothschild, and others) during the early 20th
century, and implemented by the progeny of the300

Russian Jewish Blank family, Vladimir Lenin, as oneof the bloodiest episodes of modern history, theBolshevik Revolution of 1917.
The god of materialism has since ensnared
Gentiles in much of Europe, North America andelsewhere. One of its recent high-profile victims is
an otherwise descent young man who later sells his
freedom for a career, former U.S. president Dwight
Eisenhower. He writes in his memoirs that thesmartest thing he ever did was, as a Lieutenant
Colonel going nowhere, to ask Bernard Baruch forcareer advice (Douglas Reed writes: “Baruch was a
Russian Jew... he was a financier, stock market
speculator, statesman, and presidential advisor. He
was the son of Simon Baruch, a German immigrantof Jewish ethnicity... and Belle Baruch, a Sephardic
Jew whose ancestors came to New York in the 1800s
and were in the shipping business”). Within monthsof soliciting Baruch's help, despite his military
incompetence and lack of combat experience,
Eisenhower is elevated to the highest rank in the
U.S. Army in exchange for orchestrating the greatest
war crimes in history and some of the gravest
crimes against humanity (see also, J. Bacque, Other
Losses, 1991) committed by a Gentile since Pilate.
This lost soul is in no small way responsible forextinguishing over one hundred million human lives
during the first half of the 20th century alone. And
301

Baruch is pleased: “Oh boy, oh boy, what longterm
prosperity we will have,“ he exclaims (1945) inanticipation of the real booty of World War II, global
usury—enforced by the world's greatest military
powers—known as the Bretton Woods institution(International Monetary Fund, headed [2007] by
Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the son of Ashkenazi and
Sephardic Jewish parents, and the World Bank,
headed [2007] by Paul Wolfowitz, the son of theJewish immigrant from Polish, Jacob Wolfowitz), and“negotiated” by H. D. White, the son of Jewish
immigrants from Lithuania. Later, the American
Jewry appoints its puppet to presidency (1953), as
decreed in Proverbs 8, and takes charge of the U.S.
State Department and all federal agencies, just as
the Soviet Jewry fills the Politbureau and all senior
government posts with its former (Jewish)
commissars. The doors to the new “promised land”
open wide for the massive influx of European Jews
who then fill all key positions in every sector of the
U.S. economy, news media, education andentertainment. In 2007, the host of the world's
largest Jewish population is the American people.
The sting of the same parasite that had emasculated
Babylon, Rome, Byzantine and Europe is now
castrating the free-spirited American pioneer. Yet,
blinded by the glare of vanity and greed in thedarkness of ignorance, Gentiles fail to see such302

public examples as proof of their slavery. Those who
do but remain silent, rather than risk their own
impotent lives, are willingly condemning their own
flesh and blood to live out their lives feeding new
generations of parasites with their sweat, blood andtears.
Whereas the culture of materialism means afailing grade for the spiritually subjugated who
support it, for its architects, it is a dead-end. The
misguided simply fail as human beings and remain
spiritual dwarfs. But for those who deliberately
impede Man's participation in God's Creation of
Mankind, a future is much less certain. The best
advice for all of them is to look within and realizethat their last breath will strip them of all the wealthand power they had amassed during their earthly
lives. They will leave this world empty-handed andpowerless, leaving behind not a memory of
grandeur, but a legacy of pity and shame theirchildren, in a different world, will have to hide in thecloset. Looking within will also reveal the
incompatibility of (what remains of) their own senseof human decency with their god's immorality—
whose power they generate—and give them thecourage to reject dead-end ideologies founded on
spiritual ignorance and oppression with as muchcourage and resolve as the ancient Semites rejected
Jeremiah's Judaism. These are the considerations
303

architects,
mercenaries
andworshipersofmaterialism are well advised to entertain.
The Truth—whatever it may turn out to be—though crucified, beheaded, burnt, hanged, bombed
and buried for thousands of years, is sprouting
everywhere. Studies such as this are coming out by
the hundreds: old taboos are openly debated,“history” is questioned, self-censoring (Political
Correctness) is rejected in the universities. And justas in Jesus' time, the high-priests of Judaism are in astate of panic, so one can expect the sameunchained violence against advocates of the Light as
in Jesus' time—and many times before and since.
And yet, Man, encouraged by the Father to seek theTruth, guided by the Son who shows him where to
look, and (spiritually) protected by the Mother along
the way, is seeking and sharing knowledge about his
Creator at an unprecedented rate. For every man
realizes on his death bed—if not before—that earthly
life is fleeting and beliefs founded on lies aredelusions.

304

Every man's calling
There are as many views on the purpose of life as
there are people. That view, however, is largely
governed by one's culture. People raised in the
Magus Faith believe that every man's purpose is to“create” himself during the "school semester" hecalls lifetime. They note that some take advantage ofthe opportunity to learn and advance, some waste it
and fail, and some abuse it and get expelled. Their
beliefs exclude such ideologies as fear of wrathful,jealous, vindictive gods, morbid self-punishment andneedless (self)mortification to appease gods who
enjoy watching mortals deny their divine origin andhuman dignity as they “suffer for their sins.” Suchnotions are alien to not only people of the Light,
they are repulsive to all men with any sense ofhuman decency. Even the apathetic find such beliefs
absurd and illogical. To the followers of the Light,
wrongdoings are the misdeeds of people stumblingin the dark, in ignorance of the divine plan; andmisconduct should be corrected by sharing
knowledge with the ignorant. Mistakes areexperience to learn from, and restitutions take theform of compensation to the injured party, rather
than “sacrifices” to some spectator god. Their
thinking is that, whenever possible, remedial action
should be constructive and progressive. If the loss305

cannot be undone, then the errant party is
responsible for restoring his victim's chances for life
to those he had enjoyed before his loss. For example,
the earliest known Civil Code, the Sumerian (2100
BC) Code of Ur-nammu stipulates:"If a man knocks out a tooth of another, heshall pay him compensation" (Article19).
Incontrast,
Judaism's“tooth-for-tooth”
vengeance-ideology is destructive and regressive.
This ideology, enshrined in the Hebrew Code of
Hammurabi (1760 BC), stipulates:“If a man knock out the teeth of his equal, his
teeth shall be knocked out” (Article 200).
This law reduces the errant party's chances forlife to those of his victim and enshrines therighteousness of cruelty and vengeance. It is selfevident that Ur-nammu's Sumerian justice serves its
people, whereas Hammurabi's Hebrew laws serve
his own vengeance-ideology at the expense of thepeople.
In the culture of the Light, magi are healers,
educators and leaders. They do not promote
themselves as dispensers of tickets to Heaven or
exorcists of demons. They dedicate their lives tohealing the sick, and to freely sharing knowledge ofthe cosmos, and wisdom from their interpretationsof the “Heavens.” It is the magi who later raise thegreatest Greek philosophers and most of their306

scientists, not with colonizing zeal, but unselfishly,
serving the elevation of Mankind (Grandpierre).
Nations choose their kings from among the magi totake charge of their physical and spiritual healthneeds, education and welfare (The biblical magi whocame to Jesus' cradle “from the East” are variably
called kings). The magi view humanity as equal
sparks of divine Light in every newborn, souls to
encourage to seek self-fulfillment in spiritual growththrough knowledge, love of Mankind, noble
achievements, and a healthy diet of work and play,
sobriety and laughter. They believe that Man's
progress is determined by his contribution tohumanity, and that his happiness stems not from his
ranking in the social pecking-order but fromawareness of his contribution, the knowledge that
he had made a positive difference in Mankind's
progress towards its maturity. This knowledge, they
believe, will also give Man peace and contentment
when he is called upon to shed the straitjacket ofmaterial existence and return to the Light whence
he came, a realm he cannot imagine but which, they
believe, will feel like “home.”
Magus wisdom teaches that the purpose of life is
to be a part of God's Creation rather than try tohave a piece of it. But not everyone agrees. Some
believe the purpose of life is to have. In ignorance ofthe divine plan, or by simply rejecting it as307

unprofitable, these misguided souls feed off theefforts of producers rather than become one ofthem. With time, these parasites become dependent
on their hosts and, once they realize theirdependency, become aggressively possessive. As
their fear of losing their source of sustenanceescalates,
they
progressively
increase
theirstranglehold until their fear consumes their
existence. If an outsider tries to free their host fromtheir grip by educating him, their fear turns topanic. They react to the insult on their sense of
security with unchained vengeance in the hope thatunrestrained cruelty will prevent future insults.
When the short-term ecstasy of revenge dissipatesand fear returns, they repeat their aggression, over
and over, increasing their level of cruelty with each
step, hoping that the higher “dosage” will produce
lasting fear-relief, until they become addicted to“payback” as well, the pursuit of the Old Testament“eye-for-eye” vengeance-ideology. It was thisunquenchable thirst for revenge born out of fearthat drove Caiaphas and company to torture Jesus todeath with such savagery. All because they thoughtlife was about having rather than being.
Just as aborigines worldwide have no concept ofland ownership, the Sumerians did not “own” land
before Hammurabi's Hebrew despotism, and
Hungarians do not even have a word equivalent for308

the verb have. Both examples are acknowledgmentsof a universal truth: all matter and power known to
Man exist, has existed and continue to exist
independent of any claims of ownership bytransients who may come in contact with them for atime. Perhaps this is the truth Jesus is trying to
make us understand and adopt when he tells us to
get rid of our earthly possessions; to be a part ofGod's Creation rather than try to have a piece of it.
Is a man's claim of ownership of the Universe, evenin part, any less absurd than a moth claiming
ownership of the porch light? These ought to be theobjects of meditation for those searching for the
purpose of life.
To be a part of God's Creation, Jesus encourages
us to seek the Truth. This advice makes sense only if
we view Man's calling as do Nib-Ur's (Nimrod)
peoples. They believe that every man's calling is tocreate himself, to bring into being a mature elementof humanity using his intellect and knowledge. He isborn with his intellect but must acquire knowledge
by seeking the Truth.
People of the Light believe that God offers every
man a chance to participate, at the individual level,
in God's progressive creation of Mankind or, toparaphrase the young poet, Petőfi, to become a rayof sunshine that ripens the Earth as it ripens thegrape on the vine.
309

310

Condensed time line of some major events inthe early history of the people of the Light
9000 BC - Early Neolithic Magyars are establishedin today's Hungary, and expand as the ice retreats.
They become also known as Caucasians, Huns andScythians. By the 8th mil. BC, they are an
agricultural society. They pray to their Heavenly
Mother in Tatárlaka, Hungary in 5500 BC, and build
churches in her honor (6th mil. BC). They spreadeast toward India, China and beyond, south to North
Africa as far as the Cataracts of the Nile, and west
to the shores of the Mediterranean and to Western
Europe where they become known as Celts, bringing
their civilization: beliefs, laws, knowledge andwritten language. Scythians of the Near East
emerge after the Flood, and build canals to drain themarshes of Mesopotamia where they settle. The
Neolithic revolution in the Fertile Crescent results ina demographic and economic growth that lays thefoundations of the “Sumerian” civilization. Theirculture also reaches the Americas where it is known
as the Maya civilization.
2500 BC - First appearance of nomadic Semitic
tribes in Mesopotamia. The Sumerian civilization
exerts a dominant influence upon the developmentof early Semitic cultures. Ancient Semites worship311

the Queen of Heaven.
2300 BC - The Semite Sargon imposes hishegemony on parts of Sumer. Mesopotamia isdevastated by wars; the population is decimated.
Semite immigrants of Mesopotamia conceive andworship their new god, Ea.
2000 BC - Sumerians and their allies overthrow the
Hebrew so-called Agade hegemony, liberating
themselves from foreign oppression. Gudea teaches
neighborly love, and calls bread “Body of God.”
1700 BC - Hebrew Babylonians impose theirhegemony on parts of Mesopotamia and introduce
such alien concepts as land ownership and righteous
cruelty. Sumerians rule over Southern Mesopotamia
from 1860 to 1492 BC.
1100 BC - The Kassite-Scythians of today's Western
Iran overthrow the Hebrew Babylonian hegemonyand establish their rule over Northern Mesopotamia.
700 BC - Hebrew Assyrians impose their hegemony
over the Near East after centuries of warfare. The
ensuing devastation, decimation, deportations andoppression alter the ethnic composition of the Near
East as the Semitic element increases and the non312

Semitic people dwindle.
600 BC - Mede and Chaldean-Scythians annihilate
the Assyrian Empire. Later, a political power known
as the Persians conquers Mesopotamia and much of
the Near East. Mede and Chaldean magi teach theearly Greek thinkers (Pythagoras, Socrates, Plato,
Aristotle, and others).
256 BC - The Parthian Empire, a political alliance of
non-Semitic peoples regains control of the land
between Palestine and India, and stops the eastward
expansion of the later Roman Empire.
200 BC - The Hun Empire reaches its greatest
extent, from Siberia to Parthia, the Baltic, theRoman Republic, to Gaul.
53 BC - The Parthians retake much of Canaan(Palestine). Herod flees to Rome but later recaptures
Judea.
6 BC - Jesus is born in Bethlehem, Galilee. Magi
travel from Sippar, Mesopotamia to greet the “Sonof Light.”
27 - Jesus teaches neighborly love and the Truth. He
is tortured and killed by the Jews but resurrects.
313

Rabbi Saul purges Jesus' followers.
226 - The Sassanids overthrow the Parthian Empire(The Parthians briefly regain power—272-326). The
defeated Parthian-Scythians begin a migration northto their kin, the Huns of the Carpathian Basin and
the Caucasus.
5th c. - The Huns repell the Moors, defeat the Goths
and the Romans, and Atilla imposes taxes on the
Romans, setting in motion the collapse of theWestern Roman Empire. Jews begin their migrationeast to Byzantine, and west to Western Europe.
Scythians of Parthia continue to migrate north to the
Carpathian Basin. Byzantine's attempt to convert the
Huns to Judeo-Christianity fails after the Huns rebel
against the Judeo-Christian missionaries' destructionof the Huns' religious symbols.
6-20th c. - Reinforced by waves of their kindred,refugees from Mesopotamia, join the Magyar-Hun
confederacy in the Carpathian Basin the West calls
the “Avars.” The Holy Roman Empire is born inWestern Europe. Jews migrate with the Holy Roman
Empire and, along with Sephardic Jews ousted from
Spain, appropriate the Ashkenaz(im) name. They
spread to all of Europe, including Hungary. The
Magyar nations east of the Carpathians under the314leadership of Árpád reinforce the Magyars (Hun,
Székely, “Avar”) of the Carpathian Basin and launcha series of military campaigns in Europe to recover
their religious treasures pillaged by marauding
Germanic tribes, and to foil German plans to invade
Hungary. The rightful heir to the Árpád dynasty is
killed following a conspiracy with the Holy Roman
Empire. A succession of Hungarian kings and theirheirs die young under mysterious circumstances.
Hungarians are forced to convert to JudeoChristianity during a 400-year purge of the Magus
Faith. The Inquisition tortures and executes themagi and destroys their writings. A foreign feudal
class rules their land. Hungary is truncated to 1/3 its
size in 1920.
2008 - Hungary, last custodian of the Jesus Faith isbeing overrun by a massive influx of Jews sponsoredby a puppet government—installed by a Tel Avivbased agency and kept in power by riot police—
while Magyars of the Carpathian Basin are denied
Hungarian citizenship. And yet she lives on... intestimony of the Light
***

315

316