DIVISION D- ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED AGENCIESAPPROPRIATIONS ACT. 2022

The following statement to the House of Representatives and the Senate is submitted in
explanation of the agreed upon Act making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal
year ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes.
The explanatory statement accompanying this division is approved and indicates congressional
intent. Unless otherwise noted, the language set forth in House Report 117-98 and Senate Report 117-36
carries the same weight as the language included in this explanatory statement and should be complied with
unless specifically addressed to the contrary in this explanatory statement. While some language is repeatedfor emphasis, it is not intended to negate the language referred to above unless expressly provided herein.
Additionally, where this explanatory statement states that the ··agreement only includes" or .. the following
is the only" direction. any direction included in the House or Senate report on that matter shall beconsidered as replaced with the direction provided within this explanatory statement. In cases where theHouse. the Senate, or this explanatory statement has directed a briefing or the submission of a report, such
briefing or report is to be submitted to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress.
hereinafter referred to as the Committees. House or Senate reporting requirements with deadlines prior to
or within 15 days of enactment of this Act shall be submitted not later than 60 days after enactment of thisAct. All other reporting deadlines not changed by this explanatory statement are to be met.
Funds for the individual programs and activities within the accounts in this Act are displayed in
the detailed table at the end of the explanatory statement for this Act. Funding levels that are not displayedin the detailed table are identified in this explanatory statement.
In fiscal year 2022, for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of1985 (Public Law 99- 177), the following information provides the definition of the term --program, project,
or activity" for departments and agencies under the jurisdiction of the Energy and Water Development andRelated Agencies Appropriations Act. The term ··program, project, or activity" shall include the most
specific level of budget items identified in the Energy and Water Deve lopment and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2022 and the explanatory statement accompanying this Act.

Federal /,aw t:n/im:ement. The agreement notes that the explanatory statement accompanying
the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2022 directs the Attorney
General to ensure implementation of evidence-based training programs on de-escalation and the use-offorce, as well as on police community relations, and the protection of civil rights, that are broadly
applicable and scalable to all Federal law enforcement agencies. The agreement further notes that several
agencies funded by this Act employ Federal law enforcement officers and are Federal Law Enforcement
Training Centers partner organizations. The agreement directs such agencies to consult with the Attorney
General regarding the implementation of these programs for their law enforcement officers. The agreement
further directs such agencies to submit a report to the Committees on their efforts relating to such
implementation not later than 180 days after consultation with the Attorney General. In addition, theagreement directs such agencies. to the extent that they are not already participating, to consult with the
Attorney General and the Director of the FBI regarding participation in the National Use-of-Force Data
Collection. The agreement further directs such agencies to submit a report to the Committees not later than
180 days after enactment of this Act on their efforts to so participate.

2

TITLE I-CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYCORPS OF EN(ilNl'l :RS-CJVJI.

The summary tables included in this title set forth the dispositions with respect to the individual
appropriations, projects, and activities of the Corps o f Engineers (Corps). Additional items of this Act are
discussed below.

, ldvanced Fund~ Agreements. - The agreement reiterates Senate direction.
, lpportionment Under a Continuing Rewlution.- The change in apportionment policy is rejected
and the Administration is directed to follow the previous policy during any continuing resol utions that may
occur in this or any future fiscal years.

!Judge/ Structure ( "hanxes.- The fi scal year 2022 budget request for the Corps proposed
numerous structural changes. including the creation o f two new accounts, Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund(HMTF) and Inland Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF): the shifting of various studies and projects amongaccounts and business lines; and the consolidation of certain remai ning items. The agreement rejects all
such proposed changes and instead funds all activities in the accounts in which fundin g has traditiona lly
been provided. Unless expressly noted, all projects and studies remain at the levels proposed in the budget
request but may be funded in different accounts. In particular:•

Projects proposed for funding in the HMTF account in the budget request are funded in
the Construction, Mississippi River and Tributaries, and Operation and Maintenanceaccounts, as appropriate:•

Proj ects requested in the IWTF account are shown in the Construction account;•

Dredge Material Manageme nt Plans, requested in the Investigations account, are fundedin the Operation and Mai ntenance account;•

Sand mitigation proj ects, proposed in the HMTF account in the budget request, arefunded in the Construction account:•

Disposition studies will continue to be funded under the Disposition of Completed
Projects remaining item in the Investigatio ns account:•

Tribal Partnership projects will continue to be funded under the Tribal Partnership
Program rema ining item in the Investigatio ns account as well as in the remai ning item in
the Constructio n account, and these amo unts may be used to cover necessary
administrative expenses prior to agreement executio n;•

Inspection of Completed Works, Project Condition Surveys. Scheduling of Reservoir
Operations and Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters will continue to be funded
under states instead of consolidated into national programs as req uested in the Operationand Maintenance account and the HMTF account: and3

•Inspection of Completed Works will continue to be funded under the individual states
instead of consolidated into a national program as requested in the Mississippi River andTributaries account.

For any fiscal year, if the Corps proposes budget structure changes, the budget proposal shall beaccompanied by a display of the funding request in the traditional budget structure.

Continuing Contracts. -The Corps is authorized by section 621 of title 33, United States Code, to
execute its Civil Works projects through the use of a Special Continuing Contract Clause or Incremental
Funding Clause as described in Engineering Circulars 11-2-221 and 11-2-222. The Administration is
directed to resume using its existing continuing contract authorities in accordance with the generalprovisions in this Act as an efficient approach to managing large, multi-year projects.

[)eep [)raji Navigation-The agreement provides an estimated $2,049,292,000 for HMTF
eligible activities in accordance with the changes in the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) and the Water
Resources Development Act (WRDA) of2020 (Public Law 116-260). The agreement provides$50,000,000 for the program authorized by section 2106 of the Water Resources and Reform Development
Act (WRRDA) of2014 (Public Law 113-121).

Inland Navigation-The following is the only direction with regard to the availability ofadditional funds for IWTF cost-shared projects. The agreement provides funds from the IWTF for new andongoing construction projects.

Invasive Carp.-The Corps is undertaking multiple efforts to stop invasive carp from reaching theGreat Lakes. Last year, the Corps sent Congress an approved Chiefs Report for a plan to build acomprehensive suite of measures to counter invasive carp at the Brandon Road Lock and Dam, critical to
keeping invasive carp out of the Chicago Area Waterways System, which is the only continuous connection
between the Great Lakes and Mississippi River basins. There is appreciation that the project received apositive recommendation in the Report of the Chief of Engineers and that funding is included in the fiscal
year 2022 budget request to continue work on preconstruction engineering and design (PED).
As the Corps prioritizes projects, it shall consider critical projects to prevent the spread of invasive
species. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees quarterly updates on the progress and status ofefforts to prevent the further spread of invasive carp, including the Brandon Road Recommended Plan andthe second array at the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; the location and density of carp populations; theuse of emergency procedures previously authorized by Congress; the development, consideration, andimplementation of new technological and structural countermeasures; and progress on PED work.
The Corps shall continue to collaborate at levels commensurate with previous years with the U.S.
Coast Guard, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the State of Illinois, and members of the Invasive Carp
Regional Coordinating Committee, including identifying navigation protocols that would be beneficial oreffective in reducing the risk of vessels inadvertently carrying aquatic invasive species, including invasive
carp, through the Brandon Road Lock and Dam in Joliet, Illinois. Any findings of such an evaluation shallbe included in the quarterly briefings to the Committees. The Corps is further directed to implement4

navigation protocols shown to be effective at reducing the risk of entrainment without jeopardizing thesafety of vessels and crews. The Corps and other federal and state agencies are conducting ongoing
research on additional potential invasive carp solutions. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees
not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on such navigation protocols and potential
solutions.

Reporting Requirement.-The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees a quarterly reportthat shall include the total budget authority and unobligated balances by year for each program, project, or
activity, including any prior year appropriations. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works is
directed to provide to the Committees a quarterly report that includes the total budget authority andunobligated balances by year for each activity funded in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army
for Civil Works account, including any prior year appropriations.

ADDITIONAL FllNDINU

The agreement includes funding above the budget request to ensure continued improvements to
our national economy, public safety, and environmental health that result from water resources projects.
This funding is for additional work that either was not included in the budget request or was inadequately
budgeted. The bill contains a provision requiring the Corps to allocate funds in accordance with only the
direction in this agreement. In lieu of all House and Senate direction-under any heading-regarding
additional funding, new starts, and the fiscal year 2022 work plan, the Corps shall follow the direction
included in this explanatory statement.
The executive branch retains complete discretion over project-specific allocation decisions within
the additional funds provided, subject to only the direction here and under the heading" Additional
Funding" or "Additional Funding for Ongoing Work" within each of the Investigations, Construction,
Mississippi River and Tributaries, and Operation and Maintenance accounts. A study or project may not be
excluded from evaluation for being "inconsistent with Administration policy." Voluntary funding in excessof legally-required cost shares for studies and projects is acceptable, but shall not be used as a criterion forallocating the additional funding provided or for the selection of new starts.
The Administration is reminded that these funds are in addition to the budget request, andAdministration budget metrics shall not be a reason to disqualify a study or project from being funded. It is
expected that all of the additional funding provided will be allocated to specific programs, projects, or
activities. The focus of the allocation process shall favor the obligation, rather than expenditure, of funds.
Additionally, the Administration shall consider the extent to which the Corps is able to obligate funds as it
allocates the additional funding.
The Corps shall evaluate all studies and projects only within accounts and categories consistent
with previous congressional funding. When allocating the additional funding provided in this Act, theCorps shall consider eligibility and implementation decisions under Public Law 115-123, Public Law 116-5

20, Public Law 117-----43, and Public Law 117- 58 so as to maximize the reduction of risk to public safety
and infrastructure and the reduction of future damages from floods and storms nationwide.
A project or study shall be eligible for additional funding within the Investigations, Construction,and Mississippi River and Tributaries accounts if: (I) it has received funding, other than through a
reprogramming, in at least one of the previous three fiscal years; or (2) it was previously funded and could
reach a significant milestone, complete a discrete element of work. or produce significant outputs in fiscal
year 2022. None of the additional funding in any account may be used for any item where funding was
specifically denied or for projects in the Continuing Authorities Program (CAP). Funds shall be allocatedconsistent with statutory cost share requirements.
The Corps is reminded that the flood and storm damage reduction mission area can include
instances where non-federal sponsors are seeking assistance with flood control and unauthorized discharges
from permitted wastewater treatment facilities and that the navigation mission area includes work in remoteand subsistence harbor areas. In addition to the priority factors used to allocate all additional funding
provided in the Construction account, the Corps also shall consider the non-federal sponsor's ability andwillingness to promptly provide the required cash contribution, if any, as well as required lands, easements.
rights-of-way , relocations, and disposal areas.

Work Plan.-The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 60 days afterenactment of this Act a work plan including the following information: (I) a detailed description of theprocess and criteria used to evaluate studies and projects: (2) delineation of how these funds are to beallocated; (3) a summary of the work to be accomplished with each allocation, including phase of work andthe study or project's remaining cost to complete (excluding Operation and Maintenance); and (4) a list of
all studies and projects that were considered eligible for funding but did not receive funding, including an
explanation of whether the study or project could have used funds in fiscal year 2022 and the specificreasons each study or project was considered as being less competitive for an allocation of funds.

New Starts. -The agreement includes funding for a limited number of new projects, including
those proposed in the budget request. No further new starts are provided for in this Act.
There continues to be confusion regarding the executive branch's policies and guidelines
regarding which studies and projects require new start designations. Therefore, the Corps is directed to
notify the Committees at least seven days prior to execution of an agreement for construction of any project
except environmental infrastructure projects and projects under the CAP. Additionally. the agreement
reiterates and clarifies previous congressional direction as follows. Neither study nor construction activities
related to individual projects authorized under section 1037 of the WRRDA of2014 shall require a newstart or new investment decision; these activities shall be considered ongoing work. No new start or new
investment decision shall be required when moving from feasibility to PED. The initiation of constructionof an individually authorized project funded within a programmatic line item may not require a new startdesignation provided that some amount of construction funding under such programmatic line item wasappropriated and expended during the previous fiscal year. No new start or new investment decision shall6be required to initiate work on a separable element of a project when construction of one or more separable
elements of that project was initiated previously: it shall be considered ongoing work. A new construction
start shall not be required for work undertaken to correct a design deficiency on an existing federal project:
it shall be considered ongoing work. The Corps is reminded that resumptions are just that~ resumption ofpreviously-initiated studies or projects and, as such, do not require new start designations.

INVl 'STl(iAl'l(>NSThe agreement includes $ I-B ,000 ,000 for Investigations.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Investigations account is shown in thefollowing table:

7

8

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

600

600

ALABAMA
CLAIRBORNE AND MILLERS FERRY LOCKS AND DAMS (FISH PASSAGE), LOWERALABAMA RIVER, AL
TENNESSEE TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY AND BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE

400

RIVERS DEEPENING STUDY, AL & MS
ALASKAAKUTAN HARBOR NAVIGATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS, AK
ELIM SUBSISTENCE HARBOR, AK
LOWELL CREEK (TUNNEL) FLOOD DIVERSION, AK

100
2,000

2,000
3,000

ARIZONA500

LITTLE COLORADO RIVER, WINSLOW, AZ
CALIFORNIAIMPERIAL STREAMS SALTON SEA, CA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA (CHANNELS), CA
LOS ANGELES RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, CA
LOWER MISSION CREEK, CA (GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT)LOWER SAN JOAQUIN (LATHROP & MANTECA), CA
MURRIETA CREEK, CA (GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT)NORTHERN CALIFORNIA STREAMS, LOWER CACHE CREEK, YOLO COUNTY,

200
565
1,693
600

1,693

600

600

200

2,000

WOODLAND & VICINITY, CA
SAN FRANCISCO WATERFRONT STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION STUDY, CA
SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA

200
200

COLORADO400

ADAMS & DENVER COUNTIES, SOUTH PLATTE RIVER, CO
CONNECTICUT

200

HARTFORD & EAST HARTFORD, CT
FLORIDACENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA (C&SF) FLOOD RESILIENCY (SECTION 216)
STUDY, FL
FORT PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL
ST. AUGUSTINE BACK BAY, FL

500

500
400
200

HAWAIIHONOLULU HARBOR MODIFICATION FEASIBILITY STUDY, HI

800

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

500

500

4,940

4,940

500
500

500
500
250

IDAHO
BOISE RIVER, GARDEN CITY, ADA COUNTY, ID
ILLINOIS
BRANDON ROAD LOCK AND DAM, AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL SPECIESBARRIER, IL (GREAT LAKES AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER INTERBASIN STUDY)
CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL (GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT)GREAT LAKES COASTAL RESILIENCY STUDY, IL, IN, Ml, MN, NY, OH, PA and WIIL RIVER 519 FOX RIVER DAMS RESTORATION, IL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR
PORTION), IL
UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER FLOODING & RESTORATION, IL

700

I\

1,525

KANSAS
LOWER MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, KS, MO and IA
UPPER TURKEY CREEK BASIN DESIGN , MERRIAM, KS

600

600
500

KENTUCKYKENTUCKY RIVER, BEATYVILLE, KY

450
LOUISIANA

HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA
PORT FOURCHON BELLE PASS CHANNEL, LA
PORT OF IBERIA, LA

350
300
1,200

MICHIGAN
AL TAMAHA RIVER, OCONEE RIVER AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, BELLVILLE POINT
HARBOR, DARIEN HARBOR, FANCY BLUFF CREEK, SAPELO HARBOR, SATILLA
RIVER AND ST. MARYS RIVER WATERWAYS, Ml
MENOMINEE RIVER DEEPENING, Ml & WI

100
200

MINNESOTA
LOWER ST. ANTHONY FALLS, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MNMISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVPPORTION), MN

250
1,650

I\

MISSOURIUTILE BLUE RIVER BASIN, JACKSON COUNTY, MO
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN - BRUNSWICK L-246, MO
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN - HOLT COUNTY, MO, DONIPHAN COUNTY, KS
LOWER MISSOURI BASIN - JEFFERSON CITY L-142, MO

600

600
300
100
200

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

750

750

1,450
500

1,200
1,125
1,450
500

NEW JERSEYNEW JERSEY BACK BAYS, NJ
NEW YORKHUDSON RARITAN ESTUARY ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, NY & NJ
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR ANCHORAGES, NY & NJ
NEW YORK - NEW JERSEY HARBOR AND TRIBUTARIES, NY & NJ
SPRING CREEK SOUTH, JAMAICA BAY (HOWARD BEACH), QUEENS, NY
NORTH CAROLINA500

WILMINGTON HARBOR NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, NC
OHIO
300
300
300
300
300

ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH

A
A
A
A
A

OKLAHOMA200

OPTIMA LAKE, OK
OREGONCOLUMBIA RIVER TREATY 2024 IMPLEMENTATION, OR
WILLAMETIE RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING, OR

10,000A

732

PUERTO RICOCANO MARTIN PENA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, PR

2,150

2,150

500

500

342
500

500

RHODE ISLANDUTILE NARRAGANSETT BAY, RI
SOUTH CAROLINAPORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC
WACCAMAW RIVER, HORRY COUNTY, SC
SOUTH DAKOTAWATERTOWN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY, SD

200

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

600

600

TENNESSEEHATCHIE/LOOSAHATCHIE, MISSISSIPPI RIVER MILE 775-736 HABITATRESTORATION, TN & AR
TEXAS
ARKANSAS-RED RIVER CHLORIDE CONTROL, AREA VIII, TX
CITY OF EL PASO, TX
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT, TX
GIWW - BRAZOS RIVER FLOODGATES & COLORADO RIVER LOCKS, TX
LOWER RIO GRANDE VALLEY WATERSHED ASSESSMENT, TX
WESTSIDE CREEKS ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, SAN ANTONIO, TX

343
600
200
6,932

600

2,340

6,932
200
2,340

3,777

3,777

VIRGIN ISLANDSSAVAN GUT PHASE II, ST. THOMAS, VI

WASHINGTONCOLUMBIA RIVER TURNING BASIN NAVIGATION IMPROVEMENTS, WA & OR

200

WISCONSIN
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI
OTIER CREEK WATERSHED WETLAND RESTORATION, WI

/I

300
300
75

/I

WYOMING
LITILE GOOSE CREEK, SHERIDAN, WY
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES

500

500

50,85751,864

REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING
ACCESS TO WATER DATAAUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT Tri-CA DD
COASTAL FIELD DATA COLLECTION
COORDINATION WITH OTHER WATER RESOURCES AGENCIESDISPOSITION OF COMPLETED PROJECTSENVIRONMENTAL DATA STUDIESFERC LICENSING
FLOOD DAMAGE DATAFLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICESHYDROLOGIC STUDIES

325
250
1,500
450
80
100
275
15,400
500

7,006
325
250
3,000
1,000
2,000
80
100
275
12,000500

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - INVESTIGATIONS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
INTERAGENCY WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIESINVENTORY OF DAMSNATIONAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
NATIONAL SHORELINE MANAGEMENT STUDYPLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATESPLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAMPRECIPITATION STUDIESREMOTE SENSING/GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SUPPORTRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTSCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTERS
SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONSSTREAM GAGING
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSTRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMREQUEST
75
100
400
6,500

7,000
3,500
150
75
15,000
50
750
1,500
1,000

FINAL BILL

75
100
400
6,500
1,500
9,000
3,500
150
75
35,000
50
750
1,500
1,000
5,000 *SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

54,98091,136TOTAL, INVESTIGATIONS

105,837

143,000"Funded in a remaining item in another account.
- Funded in remaining items.
* Includes funds requested in Projects Listed Under States within this account.

l rpdated C'apahilities.

The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward based

on updated technical information from the Corps.

Additional Funding- The Corps is expected to allocate the additional funding provided in thisaccount primarily to specific feasibility and PED phases. rather than to remaining items as has been thecase in previous work plans.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this account. the Corps shall consider giving
priority to completing or accelerating ongoing studies that will enhance the nation's economic
development. job growth, and international competitiveness; for projects located in areas that have suffered
recent natural disasters; for projects that protect life and property, including reducing flood risks tovulnerable communities or projects that have been authorized based on their ability to reduce life safety
risks; for projects that have been classified by the Corps as having a high risk of levee failure and life loss
in the last five fiscal years: for projects whose failure would cause a release of hazardous material from a
Superfund site; or for projects to address legal requirements. The Corps is urged to consider any national
security benefits a project may have when allocating this funding. The Corps shall use these funds for
additional work in both the feasibility and PED phases. The Administration is reminded that a project study
is not complete until the PED phase is complete and that no new start or new investment decision shall be
required when moving from feasibility to PED.

Coastal Field Data Colleelion.

The agreement includes an additional $1,500,000 above thebudget request amount of $1,500.000 to continue data collection and research on the impact of extreme
storms in coastal regions.

Coordination with O!her Water Resource Agenc.:ie.\·. -Additional funds are included for continued
collaboration with other federal agencies and stakeholders on invasive species challenges.

/Ji.\position rlf Completed Projects. -The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees copies ofdisposition studies upon completion. The agreement rejects the budget request proposal to fund adisposition study of the Arkansas Red River Chloride Control project. The Corps is directed to brief theCommittees not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act on the status of the project.

Flood Policy in l !rhan Areas.-The agreement reiterates Senate direction.
AkClellan-Kerr Arkansas River .VaviJ.;ation ,\vstem (A1KA RVS). Arkansas and Oklahoma.-The
agreement reiterates Senate direction.

Sew York-lv'ew Jersey I larhor and Trihuturies Study. -The Corps is expected to vigorously
engage community groups and incorporate impacts of low-frequency precipitation and impacts of sea level
rise in the study. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 45 days after enactmentof this Act a briefing on the status of this study.

Non-( 'ontiguous Regional Sediment S!udy. -The Corps shall, within available funds in the
National Shoreline Management Study remaining item. conduct a study and provide to the Committees notlater than one year after enactment of this Act a report on how beneficial uses of dredged material for non-9contiguous states and territories can be applied to mitigate rising sea levels , including impacts on sensitive
shoreline areas.

f'lanning Assistance to States.-The agreement notes the important role the Corps plays inmanaging flood risk and threats from coastal hazards and that the Planning Assistance to States programprovides in assisting with comprehensive plans and technical assistance to eligible state, tribal, or U.S.
territory partners. Accordingly, the agreement provides $9,000.000 for the program. Within the funds
provided, the Corps is directed to prioritize providing planning-level technical assistance to coastal
federally recognized tribal communities that are actively working to relocate homes and other criticalinfrastructure to higher ground to mitigate the impacts of climate change. The Corps is directed to provide
to the Committees not later than 45 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on its efforts to comply withthis directive, how the Corps' existing authorities can provide assistance to coastal federally recognizedtribal communities actively working to relocate their homes, and how these authorities could be
modernized to better assist these communities.

f'uget Sound Nearshore Study. Washington.-The Corps is encouraged to proceed with the tiered
implementation strategy using all existing authorities as outlined in the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem
Restoration Project Feasibility Study. Completion Strategy Guidance dated June 2015. The Corps isdirected to recognize the Puget Sound Nearshore Study as the feasibility component for the purposes ofsection 544 of WRDA 2000 (Public Law I06-541 ). The agreement notes that the Water Infrastructure
Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act ( Public Law 114-322) authorized construction of the Puget
Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project. The Corps is reminded that consistent with the directionin this agreement no new start, new investment decision, or new phase decision shall be required tocontinue this project in PED.

Research and Development.- The agreement encourages the Corps to engage in monitored fieldtrials of coastal restoration optimized for blue carbon CO2 sequestration . The Corps is directed to provide
to the Committees not later than 180 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on such efforts and how theCorps collaborates with other federal and state agencies on these issues. The Corps is also encouraged tocollaborate with university partners to improve the capabilities for improving the integrity and perfonnanceof the nation's levee systems. The agreement provides $4.000,000 to modernize existing Corps coastal andhydraulics models and integrate them to make them accessible for use by other agencies, universities, andthe public . The Corps is directed to investigate the presence, geochemistry, and potential recovery of rareearth elements in dredged materials. The Corps is reminded that activities related to innovative materials, as
required under section 1208 of America's Water Infrastructure Act (A WIA) of 2018, are eligible forfunding under the Research and Development remaining item.

Research and Development. Biopo~vmers.-The agreement provides $6.000,000 to continue
research activities. With continued funding, it is understood that this effort will be completed in two years.

10Research and IJevelopmenl, l:i:ohydraulic.:s.

The Corps is encouraged to consider advancement

and implementation of capabilities regarding ecohydraulic data and models to support project planning andengineering models for decision making and advance ecohydraulics tools.

Research and IJevelopmenl, flood and Coastal i):vstems.

The agreement provides $5,000,000 to

utilize partnerships to research and develop advanced technology to automate assessment and inspection offlood control systems. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 90 days afterenactment of this Act a proposal for this effort, including a detailed scope of work with a breakdown ofresearch activities, work to be performed by the Corps and academia, specific deliverables, and scheduleand funding requirements. This work shall be for the purpose of identifying levee deficiencies, such as
slope instability, settlement and seepage, and ensuring the safety of the surrounding areas and communities.

Research and J>evelopment. Freshwater Intrusions.

There is recognition of the need to develop

tools to assess, forecast, and proactively manage the hydrodynamic and environmental impacts of largescale freshwater intrusion into the Mississippi Sound and surrounding waters. These consistent freshwater
intrusions have been detrimental to the Mississippi Sound and the U.S. blue economy. The Corps is
encouraged to partner with academia with expertise in coastal processes and ocean and hydrodynamic
modeling to develop these tools.

Research and /)evelopment, Future /,Vork.

The value of research topics currently being addressedby the Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) toward advancing the Civil Works
missions of the Corps is valued and recognized. It is understood that the ERDC and the Corps haveidentified a series of critical research categories that will advance the efficient implementation of the Civil
Works mission and provide value to the nation. It is understood that responding to these research needs canbenefit the Corps by leveraging the expertise of universities through partnerships. The ERDC is directed toprovide to the Committees not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on future researchneeds (including multi-year funding requirements) and potential university partnerships related to its
strategic goals.

Research and Development. Managing },·merging lhreats and Resilienc.:efcJr Flood ( 'ontrol
Structures.

The Corps is encouraged to research, test, and refine the use of rapid, repeatable, and remotemethods for long-term monitoring of critical water infrastructure and to partner with academia to research
and manage emerging threats and attain resilience for flood control structures.

Research and Development, Afodeling

The agreement provides $4,000,000 to support ongoing

research into geochemical, geophysical, and sedimentological analysis and modeling. It is understood thatwith continued funding this effort will be completed in three years.

Research and /)evelopment. Oyster Reef Restoration.

The importance of sustainable oyster reefs

for maintaining healthy ecosystems, protecting coastal infrastructure, and supporting commercial fisheries
is recognized. Recent restoration efforts have not achieved the intended success for U.S. oyster populations,and the identification of effective restoration strategies remains a critical gap. The agreement provides$3,000,000 for these activities. It is understood this effort will be completed in fiscal year 2022. The Corps11

is encouraged to develop partnerships with research universities to leverage their expertise to enhance these
activities.

Research and /)evelopmenl. !'olymer ( 'omposites.-The Corps is directed to provide to theCommittees not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a proposal for investigating the value ofincorporating polymer composites into infrastructure application in navigable waterways. The proposal
shall include a detailed scope of work, a breakdown of research activities, work to be performed by theCorps and academia, specific deliverables, and schedule and funding requirements.

Research and /)evelopment. Subsurface Orains.-The Corps is directed to provide to theCommittees not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on research and development
opportunities of subsurface drain systems pursuant to section 227 of WRDA 2020.

Research and /)evelopment. l,'rhan Flood Damage Reduction.-The agreement includes$3,000 ,000 for the Corps to continue its focus on the management of water resources infrastructure andprojects that promote public safety, reduce risk. improve operational efficiencies, reduce flood damage, andsustain the environment. Work should focus on unique western U.S. issues like wildfire, rain-on-snow,
atmospheric rivers effects on flood risk management, and bridging the connection between climate change
science and engineering application for flood risk management, emergency management, and ecosystemmanagement. The tools and technologies developed under this program should also be applicable to otherparts of the country. It is understood that with continued funding this effort will be completed in three
years.

7'enkiller Ferry Isake.-The agreement reiterates Senate language.

C< )NSTRl ICTION

The agreement includes $2,492 ,800 ,000 for Construction.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Construction account is shown in thefollowing table:

12

13

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

96,850149,000

ARKANSAS

MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, THREE RIVERS, AR

ARIZONA
WESTERN RURAL WATER, AZ., NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY (Arizona

4,000

Environmental Infrastructure, AZ)
WESTERN RURAL WATER, AZ, NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY (Arizona

638

Environmental Infrastructure, AZ - City of Tolleson)

1,841

TRES RIOS, AZ
CALIFORNIAAMERICAN RIVER COMMON FEATURES, NATOMAS BASIN, CA
CALAVERAS COUNTY, SECTION 219, CA
CITY OF NORWALK, SECTION 219, CA
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, SECTION 219, CA
HAMILTON AIRFIELD WETLANDS RESTORATION, CA
HARBOR/SOUTH BAY, LOS ANGELES, CA
NEW RIVER, IMPERIAL COUNTY, CA
SACRAMENTO AREA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE {CITY OF FOLSOM),

156,91575

CA
SACRAMENTO AREA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE (ORANGEVALE), CA

75

SACRAMENTO AREA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE (ROSEVILLE-PCWA
COOPERATIVE WATER RELIABILITY, SECTION 219), CA
SAN CLEMENTE SHORELINE, CA
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN, LOWER SAN JOAQUIN, CA
SURFSIDE -SUNSET-NEWPORT BEACH, CA
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA
WHITIIER NARROWS, CA (DAM SAFETY)

156,915
1,000
250
250
1,000
3,790
500

75

15,00017,900219,591

9,306
15,00015,50017,900219,591

COLORADOOTERO, BENT, CROWLEY, KIOWA, AND POWERS COUNTIES, SECTION 219, CO

7,000

DELAWARE
DELAWARE COAST, CAPE HENLOPEN TO FEN WICK ISLAND, DE
DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE
DELAWARE COAST, REHOBOTH BEACH TO DEWEY BEACH, DE

4,000
1,200
7,650

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIACHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONM ENTAL RESTORATION & PROTECTION PROGRAM,
DC, DE, MD, NY, PA, VA & WV

5,750

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS· CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

350,000

6,000
10,549350,000

24,00024,00033,1709,100 *
6,025
45,10033,170FLORIDAFLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, FL
FORT PIERCE, FL
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION , FL
GEORGIASAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA
ILLINOISCALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN
MADISON & ST. CLAIR COUNTIES, IL
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER· ILLINOIS WW SYSTEM, IL, IA, MN, MO & WI
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION , IL, IA, MN, MO and WIINDIANA

10,00018,395 *2,700

CALUMET REGION , IN
IN DIANA HARBOR, CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY, IN
IN DIANA SHORELINE, IN

IOWAMISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND and
SD

8,075

8,075

KANSAS

4,000

FAIRFAX JERSEY CREEK, KS
KENTUCKY

1,500

SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY, KY (MARTIN COUNTY)LOUISIANA
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA
J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA
LOUISIANA COASTAL AREA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, LA

6,000

9,000 *
2,250
6,000
10,000SOUTHWEST COASTAL LOUISIANA HURRICANE PROTECTION, LA
MARYLANDANACOSTIA WATERSHED RESTORATION, PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MD
ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD
CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD and VA

30,0003,880

30,000600 *3,880CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
CUMBERLAND, MD & RIDGELEY, WV
POPLAR ISLAND, MD

FINAL BILL
390
4,200

*

MICHIGANECORSE CREEK, WAYNE COUNTY, Ml
SAULT SAINTE MARIE (NEW 500 LOCK), Ml

480,000

1,675
480,000

MINNESOTA
926
926

SECTION 569, ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, CITY OF BIWABIK, MN
SECTION 569, ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, VIRGINIA STREET, MN
MISSOURI

12,600MONARCH-CHESTERFIELD, MO
NEW JERSEYDELAWARE BAY COASTLINE, OAKWOOD BEACH, NJ
GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET AND PECK BEACH (OCEAN CITY), NJ
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ
TOWNSENDS INLET TO CAPE MAY INLET, NJ

30,0005,000
17,0001,000
15,500NEW MEXICOACEQUIAS ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE, NM

1,500

NORTH CAROLINACAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, NC
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC

2,000
22,000 *NORTH DAKOTA
136,496

PIPESTEM LAKE, ND

136,496OHIO
CITY OF LORAIN ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE SEWER PROJECT, OH
OHIO RIVERFRONT, CINCINNATI, OH

3,375
300

OKLAHOMA
MIDWEST CITY, OK

5,000
OREGONCOLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR and WA

25,60925,609CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL
6,200

WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR
PENNSYLVANIA
SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT

3,246(CONFLUENCE BOROUGH MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY WATER QUALITY PROJECT),PA

12,800

UPPER OHIO NAVIGATION, PA
SOUTH CAROLINA

19,785

LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SC
VERMONT
LAKE CHAMPLAIN BASIN (SECTION 542), VT

5,250

VIRGINIANORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA (DEEPENING)

83,70083,7003,575

38,375
1,200
29,7 49
5,000

WASHINGTONCOLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR and ID (CRFM)DALLES TRIBAL VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WA
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA
PUGET SOUND & ADJACENT WATER RESTORATION (SPENCER ISLAND), WA

29,749WEST VIRGINIA
3,110

MARRTOWN SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION, SECTION 219, WV
SHEPHERDSTOWN SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, SECTION 571, WV
WHEELING ELM RUN FLASH FLOODING, SECTION 219, WV
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES

1,668
546
1,750,510

2, 158,776

REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING
FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDU CTION
FLOOD CONTROLSHORE PROTECTION
NAVIGATIONOTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR COMPLIANCEENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE
AQUATI C PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM
BEN EFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL PI LOT PROGRAMRESILI ENT SAN FRANCISCO BAY PILOT PROJECT, CA

25,50017,833
19,83389,255
15,83329,29 1
13,00030,0002,044(1,775 )CORPS OF ENGINEERS - CONSTRUCTION(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLCONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAMAQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SECTION 206)

1,000

11,000BENEFICIAL USES DREDGED MATERIAL (SECTION 204)
EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (SECTION 14)
CHICKASAW PARK LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON CO . KY (CAP SEC 14), KY
KANAWHA RIVER STREAMBANK STABILIZATION, WV
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY STADIUM WAY SLOPE STABILIZATION,

1,000

10,0008,000(SO)(1 ,836)MD
WATCH HILL LIGHTHOUSE, RI
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)
LOWER SANTA CRUZ RIVER, ELOY LEVEE, AZ
MCCORMICK WASH, GLOBE, AZ
RIVER ROAD, TOWN OF ROSENDALE, NY
ROSE AND PALM GARDEN WASHES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, AZ
SALMON RIVER, NY
MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION 111)
NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)
PORT OF MUSKEGON, Ml
STURGEON POINT, TOWN OF EVANS, NY
PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT(SECTION 1135)
OSAGE RIVER ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION , TUSCUMBIA, MO & MILLER
COUNTY, MO
SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)
REEL POINT PRESERVE, TOWN OF SHELTER ISLAND, NY
RONDOUT RIVERPORT, CITY OF KINGSTON , NY
ROSE LARISA PARK, RI
WADING RIVER CREEK, TOWN OF RIVERHEAD, NY
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY CORRECTION PROGRAM

(SO)

1,000

1,533

(SO)
10,000
(100)
(100)
(100)
(100)
(SO)
2,500
2,500
(100)
(100)
8,000
(300)

13,00015,000

1,000
(SO)
(100)
(SO)
(SO)
13,00015,000

INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD - BOARD EXPENSE

6060

INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD - CORPS EXPENSE275

EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION

8,100

TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMINNOVATIVE FUNDING PARTNERSHIPSSUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMSTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION* Includes funds requested in other accounts.

275
2,000

RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES
10,00042,868334,024

1,793,378

2,492,800*

Upda!ed Capuhililies. The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward based
on updated technical information from the Corps.

:lddilional Funding - The agreement includes additional funds for projects and activities toenhance the nation's economic development.job growth, and international competitiveness.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for environmental restoration or complianceand other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $14,282,000 for execution ofcomprehensive restoration plans developed by the Corps for major bodies of water.
Of the additional funds provided in this account for flood and storm damage reduction, navigation.
and other authorized project purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $15,000,000 to authorized
reimbursements for projects with executed project partnership agreements and that have completed
construction or where non-federal sponsors intend to use the funds for additional water resource
development activities.
Public Law 115-123, Public Law 116-20, Public Law 117-43, and Public Law 117-58 included
funding within the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies account to restore authorized shore protection
projects to full project profile. That funding is expected to address most of the current year capability.
Therefore, to ensure funding is not directed to where it cannot be used, the agreement includes $19,833,000
for construction of shore protection projects. The Corps is reminded that if additional work can be done ,these projects are also eligible to compete for additional funding for flood and storm damage reduction.
The agreement includes $13,000.000 in additional funding for environmental infrastructure
projects and no further direction.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps is encouraged toevaluate authorized reimbursements in the same manner as if the projects were being evaluated for new or
ongoing construction. The Corps shall not condition these funds, or any funds appropriated in this Act, on a
non-federal interest paying more than its required share in any phase of a project. When allocating theadditional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall consider giving priority to the following:I.

benefits of the funded work to the national economy;

2.

extent to which the work will enhance national, regional, or local economic development;

3.

number of jobs created directly and supported in the supply chain by the funded activity;

4.

significance to national security, including the strategic significance of commodities;

5.

ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar year, including consideration of theability of the non-federal sponsor to provide any required cost share;

6.

ability to complete the project, separable element, or project phase with the funds allocated;

7.

legal requirements, including responsibilities to tribes;

8.

effect on alleviating water supply issues in areas that have been afflicted by severe droughts in thepast four fiscal years, including projects focused on the treatment of brackish water;

9.

for flood and storm damage reduction projects ( including authorized nonstructural measures andperiodic beach renourishments) :

14

a.

population, safety of life, economic activity, or public infrastructure at risk, as
appropriate;b.

the severity of risk of flooding or the frequency with which an area has experienced
flooding; andc.

preservation of historically significant communities, culture, and heritage;

10. for shore protection projects, projects in areas that have suffered severe beach erosion requiring
additional sand placement outside of the nonnal beach renourishment cycle or in which the nonnal
beach renourishment cycle has been delayed, and projects in areas where there is risk to life andpublic health and safety and risk of environmental contamination;
11. for mitigation projects, projects with the purpose to address the safety concerns of coastal
communities impacted by federal flood control, navigation, and defense projects;
12. for navigation projects, the number of jobs or level of economic activity to be supported bycompletion of the project, separable element, or project phase;
13. for other authorized project purposes and environmental restoration or compliance projects, toinclude the beneficial use of dredged material; and14. for environmental infrastructure, projects with the greater economic impact, projects in ruralcommunities, projects in communities with significant shoreline and instances of runoff, projects
in or that benefit counties or parishes with high poverty rates, projects owed past reimbursements,
projects in financially-distressed municipalities, projects that improve stonnwater capture
capabilities, projects that provide backup raw water supply in the event ofan emergency, andprojects that will provide substantial benefits to water quality improvements.

:1quatic Plant Contra! Program.

Of the additional funding provided for the Aquatic Plant

Control Program, $17,000,000 shall be for watercraft inspection stations and rapid response, as authorized
in section I 04 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958, equally distributed to carry out subsections( d)( 1)(A)(i), ( d)( 1)(A)(ii), and ( d)(I )(A)(iii), and $3,000,000 shall be for related monitoring as authorized
by section 1170 of the A WlA. The agreement provides $1,000,000 for activities for monitoring, surveys,
and control of flowering rush and hydrilla. Additionally, $7,000,000 shall be for nationwide research anddevelopment to address invasive aquatic plants, within which the Corps is encouraged to support costshared aquatic plant management programs. Particularly, the Corps is encouraged to evaluate and address
prevention of new infestations of hydrilla in the Connecticut River Basin. The agreement also provides$150,000 to commence activities authorized under section 509 of WRDA 2020, and the Corps is directed toprovide to the Committees prior to the obligation of any funds for this purpose a briefing on how it will
implement this program. The agreement provides additional funding for activities authorized by section
505 of WRDA 2020, and the Corps is directed to provide to the Committees prior to the obligation of any
funds for this purpose a briefing on how it will implement this program.

Beneficial l!se o/Dredged A1aterial Pilot Program. -The agreement provides $2,044,000 tocontinue the pilot projects to demonstrate the economic benefits and impacts of environmentally15

sustainable maintenance dredging methods that provide for ecosystem restoration and resilient protective
measures. Cost sharing for these projects shall be in accordance with subsection (e) of section 1122 of the
WIIN Act of2016 (Public Law 114-322). The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later than
90 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on the lessons learned from the pilot program, including the
economic effects, environmental impacts and effects, alternative dredged material disposal locations andthe use of alternative dredging equipment. The Corps is further directed to provide to the Committees prior
to any effort to solicit or select any additional pilot projects a briefing on the status of the program .

Bipartisan /Judge/ Act of 201 c'/.-Significant concerns persist about the implementation of funding
provided in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 18) (Public Law 115-123) for completing highpriority flood control construction projects. Notably, the decision to publish a list of projects to be fundedusing outdated cost estimates and an inadequate risk reserve for these projects has led to serious challenges
in execution and unnecessary delays in advancing project construction. The executive branch is remindedthat the intent of the direction to complete projects using BBA 18 funds was to avoid starting more projects
than could be finished using those funds. The Administration should consider all available opportunities toadvance projects, including discrete elements, that already received BBA 18 allocations. To do otherwise
would be penalizing local communities for the fundamental mistakes of the executive branch.
The Corps shall provide quarterly reports on the obligation of funds as required by law. The lackof transparency and progress is unacceptable. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later
than 30 days after enactment of this Act. and monthly thereafter, a briefing on the status of the program andthe plan for completion of projects.

Camp J,,'J/is Beach. Saco, Maine.

The agreement reite rates Senate directio n.

Chesapeake Hay Comprehensive Water Resources and Restoration Plan and Oyster Recove,yProwam. The Corps is reminded that the Chesapeake Bay Comprehensive Water Resources andRestoration Plan and the Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery Program are eligible to compete for the
additional funding provided in this account, and the Corps is encouraged to provide appropriate fundin g infuture budget requests.

( 'olumhia River freaty.

The agreement reiterates Senate direction.

( ·onstrul'lion Funding ,<..;chedules. The agreement reiterates Senate direction.
Cominuing Authorities Program (CAP). -Funding is provided for eight CAP sections at a total of$53,000,000. The management of CAP should continue consistent with direction provided in previous
fiscal years.
The Corps shall allow for the advancement of flood control projects in combination withecological benefits using natural and nature-based solutions alone. or in combination with, built
infrastructure where appropriate for reliable risk reduction during the development of projects under CAP
205.

1/oward Hanson Dam. Washington - The Corps is directed to work expeditiously on this projectin order to meet the 2030 deadline established in the Biological Opinion . The Corps is encouraged to16continue efforts to fully implement the jeopardy Biological Opinion determining the impact of ongoing
operations of Howard Hanson Dam and specifically the ongoing work to construct a downstream fishpassage facility.

Kentuc:ky Lock and /)um. Kentucky.- There is concern about major delays on construction
projects, particularly the Kentucky Lock and Dam, which was provided funding by the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117-58) that the Administration states will physically complete andfiscally close out the project. The Corps is strongly urged to prioritize completing this project per thescheduled completion date of 2025.

MutugorJu Ship ( 'hunnel, f'exus. - The non-federal sponsor has proposed a plan for expediting thecontinued construction and expansion of the Matagorda Ship Channel. Completion of this project is criticalto remedying original project design deficiencies, decreasing accidents. and adequately accommodating
existing fully loaded vessels. Furthermore, completed expansion has the potential to provide major
economic growth for the region and is to be commended for its unique public-private partnership tocomplete. The Administration is urged to review the proposed plan as expeditiously as possible soconstruction can proceed.

South Florida 1,·c:o.\ystem Restoration (SFD?). Florida.

As in previous years, the agreement

provides funding for all study and construction authorities related to Everglades restoration under the line
item titled "South Florida Ecosystem Restoration, Florida." This single line item allows the Corps
flexibility in implementing the numerous activities underway in any given fiscal year. For fiscal year 2022,
the Corps is directed to make publicly available a comprehensive snapshot of all SFER cost shareaccounting down to the project level and to ensure the accuracy of all budget justification sheets that inform
SFER Integrated Financial Plan documents by September 30, 2022.

MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRllllJTARIESThe agreement includes $370,000,000 for Mississippi River and Tributaries.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Mississippi River and Tributaries account isshown in the following table:

17

18

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTFINAL BILL

600

5,000
600

INVESTIGATIONSLOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT STUDYRUNNING REELFOOT BAYOU, TN
CONSTRUCTION
BAYOU METO BASIN, AR
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO & TN (TOM LEE PARK)

14,300

GRAND PRAIRIE REGION, AR
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO and TN
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA

17,450BOO

24,00017,300(3,000)13,00017,450BOO
19,333
12,9002,500
7,000

MORGANZA TO THE GULF, LA
YAZOO BASIN, DELTA HEADWATERS, MS
YAZOO BASIN, UPPER YAZOO, MS
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO and TN
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY, LA, MS, MO and TN
RED-OUACHITA RIVER BASIN LEVEES, AR and LA
ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR and MO
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVER, AR and LA
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA
ATCHAFLAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVILS SWAMP, LA
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA
BONNET CARRE, LA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVE ES, LA
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA
OLD RIVER, LA
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, M S
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUN FLOWER RIVER, M S
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, M S
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARI ES, MS
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M . WHITTINGTON AUXILIARY CHANNEL, M S
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AR EA, M S
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS

77,50075
40
11,593
87
9,600
2,455
1,100

25,5001,5 17
48
3,905
140
1,940
52,020
2,990

6,070
2 24
5,362
365
S,482
900
7,632
450
290
727
450

77,500
540
252
75
40
11,593
87
9,600
2,455
1,100
20
35
25,500
1,517
560

*
-

-

*

48
3,905
3,952
140
1,940
19,020
2,990
932
202
942
6,070
224
5,362
365
5,482
900
7, 632
450
290
727
450

-

*
-

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, MEMPHIS, TN
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES

6,863

258,475

FINAL BILL

136 6,863
28 2,338 •
322,145REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING
DREDGING

5,000

FLOOD CONTROL

26,5009,857
6,498

OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESCOLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (INVESTIGATIONS)MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSIONINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (OPERATION)

6,498
90
4,625

SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

11,21347,855TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES

269,688

370,000*Includes funds requested in other accounts.
- includes funds requested in remaining items.

( ipduted ( ·upuhilities.

The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward based

on updated technical information from the Corps .

. tdditionul Funding - When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps
shall consider giving priority to completing or accelerating ongoing work that will enhance the nation ' s
economic development, job growth, and international competitiveness or for studies or projects located inareas that have suffered recent natural disasters. While this funding is shown under remaining items. theCorps shall use these funds in investigations, construction, and operation and maintenance. as applicable.
When allocating additional funds recommended in this account, the Corps is directed to give adequate
consideration to cooperative projects addressing watershed erosion, sedimentation, flooding, andenvironmental degradation.

l.ower Mississippi River Alain Siem.

The budget request proposes to consolidate several

activities across multiple states into one line item. The agreement does not support this change and instead
continues to fund these activities as separate line items.

J!ississippi River ( ·ommission.-No funding is provided for this new line item. The Corps isdirected to continue funding the costs of the commission from within the funds provided for activities
within the Mississippi River and Tributaries project.

Yuzoo Busin, Yazoo Backwater .·/rea. !vlississippi. - For mitigation of previously constructedfeatures.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCI :The agreement includes $4,570,000,000 for Operation and Maintenance.
The allocation for projects and activities within the Operation and Maintenance account is shownin the following table:

19---------..-.:::::e

JNSERT T ABLEI

20

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

ALABAMA
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL
BAYOU CODEN, AL
BAYOU LA BATRE, AL
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE (BWT) RIVERS, AL
BON SECOUR RIVER, AL
DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY {GIWW), AL
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL
MOBILE HARBOR, AL
PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL
TENNESSEE -TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY - WILDL IFE M ITIGATION, AL and MS
TENNESSEE -TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY {TIWW), AL & MS
WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL

15,252

24,652

6,745

1,800
28,986
10,676

22,672
3,000
5,008 *
27,852
4,493
3,023
6,745
180 62,212 *
2,000
150 *
85 1,800
31,276
10,67690 *ALASKA
ANCHORAGEHARBOR,AK
CH ENA RIVER LAKES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, NORTH POLE, AK
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK
ELFIN COVE, AK
HOMER HARBOR, AK
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK
LOW ELL CREEK TUNNELL (SEWARD), AKNINILCHIK HARBOR, AK
NOME HARBOR, AK
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK

6,921

75

9,205 *
6,921
1,055 *
2,660 *
785 *
200 75665 *
2,434 *
750 *AMERICAN SAMOA*ANUU HARBOR, AS
ARIZONA
ALAMO LAKE, AZ
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ
SCHEDULIN G RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ

1,600

445

1,600
175 1,936
112 445

8,956
7,460
1,998
9,525

8,956
7,460
1,868
9,425

1,936

ARKAN SASBEAVER LAK E, AR
BLAKE LY M OUNTAIN DAM , LAKE OUACHITA, AR
BLU E M OUNTAIN LAKE, AR
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
DEGRAY LAKE, AR
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR
DIERKS LAKE, AR
GILLHAM LAKE, AR
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR
HELENA HARBOR, AR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, AR
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR
NIMROD LAKE, AR
NORFORK LAKE, AR
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR and LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR
WHITE RIVER, AR
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR

REQUEST
6,587
1,846
1,488
1,430
7,947

56,136
2,831
5,691
2,267
6,572
12,065
25

FINAL BILL
6,587
1,846
1,473
1,430
7,947
15 *
929 56,136
2,831
5,691
2,122
6,297
15 *
9,525
5 *
25
127 *

CALIFORNIABLACK BUTIE LAKE, CA
BUCHANAN DAM - H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CA
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND CHANNEL, CA
FARMINGTON DAM, CA
HIDDEN DAM - HENSLEY LAKE, CA
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA!SABELLA LAKE, CA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA
NAPA RIVER, CA
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA
NEW MELONES LAKE (DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL), CAOAKLAND HARBOR, CA
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT CHANNEL), CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS CONTROL), CA
SACRAMENTO RIVER (SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL), CA
SAN FRANCISCO BAY DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY (DRIFT REM OVAL), CA
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER (PORT OF STOCKTON), CA

6,400
2,295
8,200
9,524
S25
7,495

3,440
20,220
835
1,101

6,390
2,480

3,930

990
1,018

6,400
2,295
15,016 *
8,200
9,524
525
7,495
4,700 *
3,410 3,440
20,220835
1,101
3,600 *
4,750 *
6,390
2,480
11,540 *1,790 *
3,930
200 *
13,179 *875 *1,795 *
190 *
1,018
450 *
3,883 *
5,275 *
5,040 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA
SAN RAFAEL CREEK, CA
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA
SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CA
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA
SUCCESS LAKE, CA
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA
TERMINUS DAM (LAKE KAWEAH), CA
VENTURA HARBOR, CA
YUBA RIVER, CA

6,572

2,972
5,750
200

FINAL BILL

600 *6,750 *
9,072
3,640 *
540 *
1,623 2,972
3,140 *
5,750
5,516 *
1,755 *COLORADO
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO

662
1,937
1,487
9,594
2,023

662
1,937
1,487
314 9,594
2,023
530 -

CONNECTICUTBLACK ROCK LAKE, CT
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT
NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT
THOMASTON DAM, CT
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT
WESTPORT HARBOR & SAUGATUCK RIVER, CT

643
833
558
1,317
816
585
597
1,000
890

643
833
558
1,317
970 816401 *
585
1,100 *
597
1,000
890
2,810

DELAWARE
INDIAN RIVER INLET & BAY, DE
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DE
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE andMD
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE

30

*

2 -

19,130

*

150 *
225 *
8,950 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC AND MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC

39 1, 175 *
30 *
25 *

FLORIDACANAVERAL HARBOR, FL
CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA (C&SF), FL
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (IWW) - CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE
RIVER, FL
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY {IWW) - JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, FL, AL and GA
MANATEE HARBOR, FL
MIAM I HARBOR, FL
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY (OWW), FL
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL
ST. LUCI E INLET, FL
ST. LUCIE INLET (SOUTH JETTY REHABILITATION), FLTAMPA HARBOR, FL
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL

22,2432,215 *
23,854 *1,003 2,500

4,380
8,501

1,365

8,950

6,000
7,155 *
8,021
680 *
180 *
3,710 *
5,120 *
40 *180 *1,275 *
3,449 *
100 8,950
S,750
4,800
12,472 *80 *GEORGIA
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT (ACF) RIVERS, GA, AL and FL
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIWW), GA
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA
HARTWELL LAKE, GA and SC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA
J. STROM THURMOND (JST) DAM AND LAKE, GA and SC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA
RICHARD B. RUSSELL (RBR) DAM AND LAKE, GA and SC
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AU GUSTA, GA
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA and AL

9,164
1,459
3,739
12,441
8,504
13,090
11,206
9,541

8,354

9, 164
1,459
3,739
7,778 *
11,481
8,504
13,090196 11,206
76 *
9,541
33,053 *
148 *
8,304

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLHAWAIIBARBERS POINT DEEP DRAFT HARBOR, OAHU, HI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI

300

300
797 709 *

1,245
3,063

1,245
3,063
466 2,366
750 -

IDAHO
ALBEN! FALLS DAM, ID
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID
LUCKY PEAK DAM AND LAKE, ID
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID

2,366

ILLINOISCALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN
CARLYLE LAKE , IL
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL
CHICAGO RIVER, IL
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL DISPERSAL BARRIERS, IL
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL and IN
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL and IN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR
PORTION), IL
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVSPORTION), IL
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL
REND LAKE, IL
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IL
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL

17,9655,009 *
9,560
16,823 *
635
3,000
541
61,6502,113
2,787 2,620
1,190 *
11,14080,667

81,287

34,951

31,382

14,360635
12,948541
64,6142,183
4,383

12,797103
11,222
398
11

*

*
*
*

INDIANABROOKVILLE LAKE, IN
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN
CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN
INDIANA HARBOR, IN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN
J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN
MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN
MONROE LAKE, IN
PATOKA LAKE, IN

3,157
1,335
1,467

2,051
1,915
1,479
1,446

3,157
1,561 *
1,335
1,467
8,196 *
1,264 2,051
10 *
1,915
1,479
1,446

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTPROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, IN

3,282

FINAL BILL

197 *
3,282
81 *

IOWA
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA
MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO and NE
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IA
RATHBUN LAKE, IA
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA

6,170
47,406
3,254
27,72819,5004,945
1,202 15,034
2 *
3,254
25,828
10,400KANSAS
CLINTON LAKE, KS
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS
EL DORADO LAKE, KS
ELK CITY LAKE, KS
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS
MARION LAKE, KS
MELVERN LAKE, KS
MILFORD LAKE, KS
PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS
PERRY LAKE, KS
POMONA LAKE, KS
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS
TORONTO LAKE, KS
TUTILE CREEK LAKE, KS
WILSON LAKE, KS

2,763
1,925
675
1,310
4,214
1,089
1,764
1,974
1,812
2,667
2,589
1,247
3,069
2,951
694
12,373
1,902

2,763
1,925
675
1,235
1,214
1,089
2,132 1,764
1,974
1,812
2,667
2,589
1,247
3,069
2,951
774 694
4,423
1,902

KENTUCKYBARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY and TNBARREN RIVER LAKE, KY
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY
DEWEY LAKE, KY
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY
FALLS OF THE OHIO NATIONAL WILDLI FE, KY and IN
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY
GRAYSON LAKE, KY
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY

19,522
3, 228
2,812
2,220
1,484
2,096
63
2,515
1,867
2,776

19,522
3,228
1,977
2,812
2,220
1,484
2,096
935
63
2,515
1,867
2,776

*

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY
NOLIN LAKE, KY
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN and OH
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL, IN and OH
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY

3,643
S,891
1,443
291
3,647
55,307
7,563
1,919
4,541
1,503
17,476
2,503

FINAL BILL
3,643
1,192 S,891
1,443
291
3,647
55,307
7,563
1,919
5 *
4,541
1,503
11,476
2,503

LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF and BLACK, LA
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU BODCAU DAM AND RESERVOIR, LA
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU PIERRE, LA
BAYOU SEGNETIE WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA
BAYOU TECHE, LA
CADDO LAKE, LA
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA
J. BENNETI JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE GULF OF MEXICO, LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA
WALLACE LAKE, LA
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA

1,494
33

14,230
100
1,144
285
33
25
50,030

*
*
*

*
*
so *

186

70,71527,764318

186
17,500 *1,880 *
48,5689,293 *
978 27,364
1,332 *
208 *
5,880 *
12,615 *126,000 *
51 *
200 *
158
10
15

*
*

MAINE
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME
GEORGE'S RIVER, ME
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WOR KS, M E
ISLE AU HAUT THOROUGHFARE, ME
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME

1,050 *
75
121 100
1,100 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE{AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

5,850 *
22 *4, 296 *SEARSPORT HARBOR, ME
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ME
WELLS HARBOR, ME
MARYLANDBALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (SO FOOT), MDBALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD and WV
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD
POCOMOKE RIVER, MD
PROJ ECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD
ST. PATRICK'S CREEK, MD
WICOM ICO RIVER, MD

219
2,488

20,385 *720 *219
89 2,488
510 *
8
600 *
123 2,070
4,300 *MASSACHUSETISBARRE FALLS DAM, MA
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA
CAPE COD CANAL, MA
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AR EAS, MA
CONANTBROOK DAM, MA
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA
GREE N HARBOR, MA
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA
LITILEVILLE LAKE, MA
MERRIMACK SPUR JETIY, MA
NEW BEDFORD HURRI CAN E BARRIER, MA
PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA
TULLY LAKE, MA
WEST HILL DAM, MA
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA

823
1,054
722
1,793
401
371
758
793
887
82 1
53 7

984
934
752

823
1,054
722
24,216 *
401
371
758
2,749 *
793
450 887
821
240
537
6 *
1,250 *
984
934
752

MI CHIGAN
ALPENA HARBOR, M l
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST. CLAIR, Ml
CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, M l
CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, M l
DETROIT RIVER, Ml
GRAN D HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, Ml
HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, M l
HOLLAND HARBOR, M l

5 *
243 *
570 *
6 *
7,645 *
3,934 *
1,320 *516 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, Ml
INLAND ROUTE, Ml
KAWKAWLIN DREDGING, Ml
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, Ml
LUDINGTON HARBOR, Ml
MANISTEE HARBOR, Ml
MANISTIQUE HARBOR, Ml
MARQUETTE HARBOR, Ml
MENOMINEE HARBOR, Ml and WIMONROE HARBOR, Ml
MUSKEGON HARBOR, Ml
ONTONAGON HARBOR, Ml
PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, Ml
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, Ml
ROUGE RIVER, Ml
SAGINAW RIVER, Ml
SEBEWAING RIVER, Ml
SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, Ml
ST. CLAIR RIVER, Ml
ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, Ml
ST. MARYS RIVER, Ml
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, Ml
WHITE LAKE HARBOR, Ml

570
10

FINAL BILL

329
52
570
1,279
1,007
4,111
1,332

-

*
*

*
*
*

5 *
5 *

214

2,702

1,137
1,711
1,136
1,505
828
1,133
3,844
214
1,500
1,653
1,068
58,361
2,217
500

*

*
*
*

*
*
*
*

*
*
*
*

*

MINNESOTABIG STON E LAKE AND WH ETSTONE RIVER, MN and SD
DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN and WIGRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN
MINNESOTA RIVER, MNMISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVPPORTION). MN
ORWELL LAKE, MN
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN
ST. PAUL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, MN
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, MN
TWO HARBORS, MN

318
400

1,150

318
6,847 *
25 *565 1,150
265 *

104,193

105,843

565

565
104
206
6,576
500
428
31

206
6,576

*
*

*
*

MISSISSIPPIEAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, M S
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, M S
OKATIBBEE LAKE, M S
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS

290

2,152

290
9,536 *
103 32 *2,002
6,287 *

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGETPEARL RIVER, MS and LA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS
YAZOO RIVER, MS

REQUEST
140

FINAL BILL
140
155
937
40
32

*
*
*
*

MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE, MO
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO
HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO
UTILE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS),
MO and IL
NEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MO
STOCKTON LAKE, MO
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO and AR

1,345
948

15 *
11,276
4,639
11,982
1,563 1,345
948

35,27935,054

11,301
4,639
14,482

10

*
*

4,704

2,033
5,817
9,693

4,704
5 *
174
2,033
9 *
5,817
9,693

MONTANAFT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT
LIBBY DAM, MT
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT

6,017
1,744

6,017
191 1,744
130 -

NEBRASKAGAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE and SD
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE
MISSOURI RIVER - KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA
PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE
SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE

10,093
9,151
117
1,196
1,337

9,993
9,151
785 117
1,196
1,337

1,435
591

1,435
591

NEVADA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV and CA
PINE AND MATH EWS CANYONS DAMS, NV

so -CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

NEW HAMPSHIREBLACKWATER DAM, NH
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH
HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH

865
826
890
1,933
1,204
1,253

865
826
890
1,933
111 1,204
350 *
1,253

NEW JERSEYBARNEGAT INLET, NJ
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA, NJ, PA and DE
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ
MAURICE RIVER, NJ
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS, NJ
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ
SALEM RIVER, NJ
SHARK RIVER, NJ
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ

600

760 *
300 *
15 *
41,823 *382 375 *
4,010 *
985 *
24,825 *600
2,175 *
100 *
1,150 *
8,000

NEW MEXICOABIQUIU DAM, NM
COCHITI LAKE, NM
CONCHAS LAKE, NM
GALISTEO DAM, NM
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM

1,102

6,378
2,962
3,808
685
526 1,102

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM

1,994

1,994

SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL, NM

1,502

1,502
270 937
1,006

6,378
2,962
3,808
685

937
1,006

NEW YORKALMOND LAKE, NY
ARKPORT DAM, NY
BARCE LONA HARBOR, NY
BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANN ELS, NY
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY

716
559

716
559
1,150
200
10,600**CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST
BRONX RIVER, NY
BROWN'S CREEK, NY
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY
CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY
DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY
EAST RIVER, NY
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY
FLUSHING BAY AND CREEK, NY
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, NY
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)HUDSON RIVER, NY (O and C)
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY
JONES INLET, NY
UTILE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY and NJ
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY and NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL)NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY
OSWEGO HARBOR, NY (WEST ARROWHEAD BREAKWATER)
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY
ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY
RONDOUT HARBOR, NY
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, NY
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY

712

S,799

980
832

FINAL BILL

250 *
250
20,908 *
10,525 *1,000
5,930 *
5 *
11,500 *712
25 *24,880 *100 *4,810 *
2,350 *
1,464 ~
19,025 *1,000 *
8,500
5,799
5 *
51,105 *7,885 *
12,591 *2,059 *
5,906 *
(300)
2,468 *
5,010 *
200 *
980
597 *
832

NORTH CAROLI NA
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIWW), NC
B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC
FALLS LAKE, NC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC
LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, NC
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC
NEW RIVER INLET, NC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC
w. KERR scon DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC

5,950
2,077
151
3,189

4,025

5,950
2,077
480
3,189
209
1,050
2,296
8,340
390
700
1,700
1,120
4,025
25,260

*
~

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILLNORTH DAKOTA
BOWMAN HALEY LAKE, ND
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND
HOMME LAKE, ND
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND
SOURIS RIVER, ND
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, ND

351
18,609
409
1,689
615
381

351
17,334409
311 1,689
615
128 381125 *OHIO
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH
ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH
BERLIN LAKE, OH
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH
CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH
DELAWARE LAKE, OH
DILLON LAKE, OH
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH
HURON HARBOR, OH
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH
LORAIN HARBOR, OH
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH
MICHAELJ. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH
OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OH
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH
VERMILION HARBOR, OH
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH
WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH

4,875
2,221

5,454
457 *
3,554
2,928
1,958
10,020 *2,764 *
2,057
4,364
3,335
3,880 *
8 *984 2,317 *
235
1,805
4,610
24,813
558
1,490
2,578
340 *
56
1,463 *
230 *
6,929 *
984
5,700 *
4,875
2,221

525
847
3,267

525
847
3,267

5,454
3,554
2,928
1,958

2,057
4,364
3,335

235
1,805
4,610
24,813
558
1,490
2,578
56

984

OKLAHOMAARCADIA LAKE, OK
BIRCH LAKE, OK
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTCANTON LAKE, OK
COPAN LAKE, OK
EUFAULA LAKE, OK
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK
HEYBURN LAKE, OK
HUGO LAKE, OK
HULAH LAKE, OK
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK
KAW LAKE, OK
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK
OPTIMA LAKE, OK
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE CHEROKEES, OK
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK
SARDIS LAKE, OK
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK
TEN KILLER FERRY LAKE, OK
WAURIKA LAKE, OK
WISTER LAKE, OK

2,207
1,885
16,618
5,195
1,163
454
817
1,896
1,908
2,833
4,874
37,629
5,221
198
163
1,745
1,556
5,130
11,9902,796
988

FINAL BILL

2,207
1,305
11,628
5,095
1,163
454
817
1,876
1,728
310 2,583
4,874
37,129
4,121
198
163
1,720
1,556
1,750 5,130
11,990
2,796
923

OREGONAPPLEGATELAKE,OR
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR and WA
CHETCO RIVER, OR
COLE RIVERS HATCHERY, APPLEGATE LAKE, OR
COLE RIVERS HATCHERY, LOST CREEK LAKE, OR
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR and WA
COOS BAY, OR
COOS BAY, OR (MAJOR MAINTENANCE)COQUILLE RIVER, OR
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR
COUGAR LAKE, OR
DEPOE BAY, OR
DETROIT LAKE, OR
DORENA LAKE, OR
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR
GREEN PETER - FOSTER LAKES, OR
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR and WA
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR

1,674
1,385
1,937

2,415
2,756
1,720
3,326
248
2,423
2,939
2,898
1,598
6,300
3,167
4,810

1,674
1,385
8,994 *
654 *
207
1,612
41,061 *14,840 *(6,889)
619 *
2,415
2,756
71 *
1,720
3,326
248
2,423
2,939
2,898
1,598
425 6,300
3,167
4,810

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGETMCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR and WA
NEHALEM BAY, OR
PORT ORFORD, OR
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR
ROGUE RIVER AT GOLD BEACH, OR
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR
SIUSLAW RIVER, OR
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, OR
TILLAMOOK BAY & BAR, OR
UMPQUA RIVER, OR
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, ORYAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR

REQUEST

FINAL BILL

14,983

14,983

*

80
160
1,189

459
477
2,781
104
1,049
10,350
172
1,183
80
160
1,189
4,572

*

*
*
~

*

*
*
*

*

PENNSYLVANIA
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA
ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO TRENTON, PA and NJ
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA
ERIE HARBOR, PA
FOSTER J. SAYERS DAM, PA
FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA
JOHNSTOWN, PA
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WVOHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH and WVOHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH and WVPROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA
PROMPTON LAKE, PA
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA
SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA
STILLWATER LAKE, PA
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, PA
TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA

9,064
782
312
1,886
4,734
1,677
2,244
2,348
1,260
2,013
1,837
1,225
459
3,288
2,362
5,308
2,409
18,80776,654
851
1,049
100
4,828

3,675
481
3,000

9,064
782
312
1,886
4,734
1,677
2,244
2,348
1,260
13,710 *
2,013
263 *
1,837
1,225
459
601 ~
3,288
2,362
5,308
2,409
18,80776,654
851
177 *
1,049
100
4,828
82 ~
100
3,675
481
91
3,000

*

*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
TIONESTA LAKE, PA
UNION CITY LAKE, PA
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA and MDREQUEST

FINAL BILL

3,934
626
1,381
989
4,345

3,934
626
1,381
989
4,345

PUERTO RICO

150 ~
100 *
3,940 *

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PR
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PR
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR

RHODE ISLANDBLOCK ISLAND HARBOR OF REFUGE, RI
FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, RI
GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI
PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI
WOONSOCKET LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, RI

704

543

350 *
929
350 *
49 ~
500 *
38,600 *668

SOUTH CAROLINAATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIWW), SC
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC

4,315

4,315
9,145 *
4, 175 *
65 ~
875 *

13,412386
257
22,264

10,384386
257
11,929224 ~
687
13,186158 ~SOUTH DAKOTABIG BEND DAM AND LAKE SHARPE, SD
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD and MNOAHE DAM AND LAKE OAHE, SD
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD

687
13,386TENNESSEECENTER HILL LAKE, TN
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN
J. PERCY PRI EST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN

7,806
15,984
8,610
8,292
6,481

7,806
15,984
8,610
8,292
6,481
294 ~

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTNORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL HARBOR, TN
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN

11,87027,738

FINAL BILL

15 *11,8705 *
27,738655 *TEXAS
AQUILLA LAKE, TX
BARDWELL LAKE, TX
BELTON LAKE, TX
BENBROOK LAKE, TX
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX
CANYON LAKE, TX
CEDAR BAYOU, TX
CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM - LAKE O' THE PINES, TX
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX
GRANGER LAKE, TX
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CHOCOLATE BAYOU, TX
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL (DMMP), TX
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX
JOE POOL LAKE, TX
LAKE KEMP, TX
LAVON LAKE, TX
LEWISVILLE DAM , TX
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE GEORGETOWN, TX
0 . C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX
PROCTOR LAKE, TX
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX
SABINE - NECHES WATERWAY, TX
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX

2,169
3,972
4,455
3,091
3,906
5,614

2,169
3,972
4,455
3,091
4,135 *
3,906
5,614

*

10,216
3,708

2,628
2,607
29,250

1,100
600
9,600
8,566
3,708
8,015
7,175
130
2,628
2,607
29,250

*
*

*

*
*
*

so *
1,712

2,307
6,748
261
3,699
4,094
2,871
2,703
1,336
1,439
3,393
1,570
7,448
3,352
2,892

1,712
25,250 *(1,500)1,573 ~
2,307
6,748
261
3,699
4,094
4,255 *
2,871
2,703
1,336
1,439
3,393
325 *
1,570
8,900 *
7,448
592 ~
3,352
2,892

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTTEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE AND ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLISHYDROPOWER PROJECT, TX
WACO LAKE, TX
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX
WHITNEY LAKE, TX
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX

FINAL BILL

5,500 *
3,402

3,402

3,961
2,946
7,090
5,664

3,961
2,946
7,090
5,664

UTAH

40 -

INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UTSCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT

410 -VERMONTBALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT
GORDONS LAND ING, VT
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT

986

884
949
988
817

986
250 *
9 884
949
988
817

VIRGIN ISLANDS

36 -INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VI

so *VIRGINIAATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY -ALBEMARLE AND CHESAPEAKE CANALROUTE, VA
ATLANT IC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY - DISMAL SWAMP CANAL ROUTE, VA
BENNETTS CREEK, VA
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA
DAVIS CREEK, VA
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA
HAMPTON ROADS DRIFT REMOVAL, VA

3,015

3,015

1,754

1,314
420
680
265
2,749
2,632
130
381
8,025
12,131
7,864
425
26,700
698
4,833
1,229
580
200

2,749

HAMPTON ROADS, PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS, VA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA
JOHN H. KERR LAKE, VA and NC
JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA
RUDEE INLET, VA
WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATIONS, VA

12,131
7,864

698
4,833

*
*
*
*
*

*

*
*

*
*

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

300 *YORK RIVER ENTRANCE CHANNEL, VA
WASHINGTONCHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA
COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETIE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA andPORTLAND, OR
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK AND SAND ISLAND, WA
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND THE DALLES, OR
EVERETI HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA
GRAYS HARBOR, WA
HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA
LITILE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA
MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA
SEATILE HARBOR, WA
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WA
TACOMA-PUYALLUP RIVER, WA
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA and OR
WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR, WA

676

676
56,665 *

9,065
5,012
1,314
3,133
3,559
3,095
2,849
918
13,409

299
364
4,033

849
1,894
1,117
2,513
18,851
9,065
5,012
1,223
11,199
3,133
3,559
3,095
2,849
918
13,409
810
1,276
2,334
378
493
299
53
364
4,033
2,290

*
*
*
*
*

~

*

*
*
*
*
~

*
*

WEST VIRGINIABEECH FORK LAKE, WV
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV
ELKINS, WV
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY and OH
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY and OH
R. D. BAI LEY LAKE, WV
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV
SUTTON LAKE, WV
TYGART LAKE, WV

1,534
2,883
2,944
3,098
70
17,04357,656
2,726
2,760
1,832
2,752
3,609
2,351

1,534
2,883
2,944
3,098
70
536
23,94357,656
2,726
2,760
1,832
2,752
3,609
2,351

~

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUEST

FINAL BILL

WISCONSIN
ASHLAND HARBOR, WI
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI
FOX RIVER, WI
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI
KENOSHA HARBOR, WI
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI
MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI
PORT WING HARBOR, WI
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI
STURGEON BAY HARBOR AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS, WITWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI

1,026
3,444

18

1,020
1,026
3,444
3,101
45
730
462
830
3,112
25
359
629
408
20

*
*
~

*
*
*
*
*

*
*
*

WYOMINGINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY
SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER STATES

1,678

2,337,681

70
1,678
112

~

~

3,795,547

REMAINING ITEMSADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORKNAVIGATION MAINTENANCE
DEEP-DRAFT HARBOR AND CHANNELDONOR AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS
INLAND WATERWAYS
SMALL, REMOTE, OR SUBSISTENCE NAVIGATIONOTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSESAQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCHASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIP MAINTENANCE (FEM)
CIVIL WORKS WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CWWMS)
COASTAL IN LETS RESEARCH PROGRAM
COASTAL OCEAN DATA SYSTEMS (CODS) PROGRAM
CULTURAL RESOURCESCYBERSECURITY
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVEDREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVEDREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEMDREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH (DOER) PROGRAM
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT PROGRAM (DOTS)
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM
ELECTRIC VEHICLE FLEET AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE
ENGINEERING WITH NATURE
FACILITY PROTECTION

100
8,000
100
2,500
900
4,000

1,100
5,000
100
100
8,000
4,200

21,000344,630
50,00034,55845,00028,00020,7002,000
8,000
12,050
8,500
900
4,000
11,000 *14,000 *
4,300
5,000
6,950
300
8,000
16,2504,200

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET
REQUESTFISH AND WILDLIFE OPERATION FISH HATCHERY REIMBURSEMENT
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTSINSPECTION OF COMPLETED FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTSINSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKSMONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION PROJECTSNATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM (PORTFOLIO RISK ASSESSMENT)NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP)NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORYNATIONAL (MULTIPLE PROJECT) NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR REALLOCATIONSOPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATIONPERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING SUPPORT PROGRAM
RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMREGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENTRESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE AT CORPS PROJECTSREVIEW OF NON-FEDERAL ALTERATIONS OF CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS (SECTION
408)
SCHEDULING OF RESERVOIR OPERATIONSSOIL MOISTURE AND SNOWPACK MONITORINGSTEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAMSUSTAINABLE RIVERS PROGRAM (SRP)

5,400
4,000
18,00032,500100
4,000
10,000
5,500
4,500
2,500
600
350
1,000
100
6,000

FINAL BILL

5,400
795
4,800
18,000I\

10,00013,90010,000
5,500
4,500
2,500
600
350
2,500
1,000
6,700
6,000

10,000
8,500
5,000
900
500
6,500
4,670
500

10,000SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS

165,220774,453

TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

2,502 ,901

4,570,000

VETERAN'S CURATION PROGRAM AND COLLECTIONS MANAGEMENTWATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT (WOTS)*Includes funds requested in other accounts.
/\Funded under projects listed under states.
-Requested in remaining items.

*

I\

900
5,000
6,500
4,670
5,500

l ipdated ( 'apahilities.

The agreement adjusts some project-specific allocations downward based

on updated technical information from the Corps.

Additional Fundingfvr Ongoing Work-Of the additional funding provided in this account, theCorps shall allocate not less than $7,500,000 to complete water control manual updates at projects
identified on the comprehensive list developed by the Corps and referenced in this account under theheadings "'Water Control Manuals'", including in regions impacted by atmospheric rivers and whereenhanced forecasting can improve water operations.
Of the additional funding provided in this account for other authorized project purposes, the Corps
shall allocate not less than $2,000,000 for efforts to combat invasive mussels at Corps-owned reservoirs.
When allocating the additional funding provided in this account, the Corps shall consider giving
priority to the following:1.

ability to complete ongoing work maintaining authorized depths and widths of harbors andshipping channels (including small, remote, or subsistence harbors), including where contaminatedsediments are present;

2.

ability to address critical maintenance backlog;

3.

presence of the U.S. Coast Guard;

4.

extent to which the work will enhance national, regional, or local economic development,
including domestic manufacturing capacity;

5.

extent to which the work will promote job growth or international competitiveness;

6.

number of jobs created directly by the funded activity;

7.

ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar year;

8.

ability to complete the project, separable element, project phase, or useful increment of workwithin the funds allocated;

9.

ability to address hazardous barriers to navigation due to shallow channels;

IO. dredging projects that would provide supplemental)· benefits to tributaries and waterways in close
proximity to ongoing island replenishment projects;
11. risk of imminent failure or closure of the facility;
12. extent to which the work will promote recreation-based benefits, including those created byrecreational boating;
13. improvements to federal breakwaters and jetties where additional work will improve the safety ofnavigation and stabilize infrastructure to prevent continued deterioration;
14. for harbor maintenance activities:a.

total tonnage handled;b.

total exports;c.

total imports;

d.

dollar value of cargo handled;e.

energy infrastructure and national security needs served;

21

f.

designation as strategic seaports:g.

maintenance of dredge disposal activities;h.

lack of alternative means of freight movement;

1.

savings over alternative means of freight movement; andJ.

improvements to dredge disposal facilities that will result in long-term savings, including
a reduction in regular maintenance costs.

Aquatic Nuisance ( 'ontro/ Research l'rowam.-The agreement provides $8,000,000 to
supplement activities related to harmful algal bloom research and control and directs the Corps to target
freshwater ecosystems. There is awareness of the need to develop next generation ecological models tomaintain inland and intracoastal waterways and the agreement provides $5,600,000 for this purpose.
The agreement provides $4,000,000 to establish the Harmful Algal Bloom Demonstration
Program. as authorized by WRDA 2020, and the Corps is directed to provide to the Committees prior to the
obligation of any funds for this purpose a briefing on how it will implement this program.
Additional funding recommended in this remaining item is to supplement and advance Corps
activ ities to address HABs including: early detection , prevention, and management techniques andprocedures to reduce the occurrence and impacts of ham1ful algal blooms in our nation ' s water resources ;work with university partners to develop prediction, avoidance, and remediation measures focused on
environmental triggers in riverine ecosystems; and to advance state-of-the-art Unmanned Aerial Systems
based detection , monitoring, and mapping of invasive aquatic plant species in conjunction with university
partners.
The agreement provides $500,000 for the Corps, in partnership with other federal partners, tobegin planning, design, initial engineering, and project management for construction of carp barriers in theMississippi River Basin and the Tennessee-Tombigbee waterway .

. lsset A1anagement/ Faci/ities and h1uipment Maintenance. The agreement provides $2,000,000
for research on novel approaches to repair and maintenance practices that will increase civil infrastructure
intelligence and resilience. A review of the Corps inventory, in accordance with section 6002 of the
WRRDA of 2014, should be completed with funds on hand. The Corps is directed to provide to theCommittees not later than 60 days after enactment of this Act an interim progress report.

Beneficial ( ise rJjDredged ;\4ateria/.- The agreement reiterates House direction.
Coastal Inlets Research Program. - The agreement includes additional funding for the Corps-led,
multi-university effort to identify engineering frameworks to address coastal resilience needs: to develop
adaptive pathways that lead to coastal resilience; that measure the coastal forces that lead to infrastructuredamage and erosion during extreme storm events; and to improve coupling of terrestrial and coastal
models. Additional funding is also provided for the Corps to continue work with the National Oceanic andAtmospheric Administration's National Water Center on protecting the nation's water resources.

22/)redging Operations l'echnicul 5,upport Program, Integrated Navigation Analysis and Systems
Fnham:ements.-The agreement provides additional funds in the remaining item Dredging Data and Lock
Perfom1ance Monitoring System and in the remaining item Dredging Operations Technical Support
Program to continue work.

/)redging Operations l'echnicul 5,upport Program, Integrated Savigation Analysis andVisualization.-Additional funding is included for the further development of the Integrated Navigation
Analysis and Visualization platform related to the operation and maintenance of the U.S. Marine
Transportation System.

Uectric Vehicle Fleet and ( 'harging /nfrastruL'/ure. - The Corps is directed to provide to theCommittees not later than 120 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on the status of this initiative.

};merging llarhor Projects.- The agreement includes funding for individual projects defined as
emerging harbor projects in section 21 O(t)(2) of the WRDA 1986 that exceeds the funding levels
envisioned in sections 210(c)(3) and 210(d)( I )(B)(ii) of the WRDA 1986.

/,;ngineering With Nature.-The agreement provides $16,250,000 for the Engineering with Nature(EWN) initiative. Of the funding provided in this remaining item, up to $5,000,000 is provided to employ
nature-based tools and principles to support civil works flood control and ecosystem management planningobjectives and operations in the Chesapeake Bay.
Funding under this line item is intended for EWN activities having a national or regional scope orthat benefit the Corps' broader execution of its mission areas. It is not intended to replace or preclude theappropriate use of EWN practices at districts using project-specific funding or work performed across other
Corps programs that might involve EWN.
Of the funding provided in this remaining item, $5,000,000 is to support ongoing research andadvance work with university partners to develop standards. design guidance, and testing protocols toimprove and standardize nature-based and hybrid infrastructure solutions.

Federal Breakwaters and Jetlies.- The agreement reiterates House direction.
Flood and Earthquake Jfodeling - Additional funds are recommended in the Earthquake Hazards
Reduction Program to develop a plan for leveraging existing knowledge related to potential seismic
concerns relevant to levees.

r<Jrecust-!nformed Reservoir Operations. -The agreement reiterates Senate direction.
l!armful Algal Bloom and 1/ypoxia Research and ( 'ontrol Act. -The agreement reiterates House
direction.

/,evee Sajely. - ln fiscal year 2020, Congress provided $15,000,000 to implement levee safety
initiatives to meet the requirements under section 3016 of WRRDA. These funds are expected to be
sufficient to complete Phase 11 activities. The Corps is directed to provide to the Committees not later than
90 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on its efforts to implement the National (Levee) Flood
Inventory and Inspection of Completed Federal Flood Control Projects as well as a report detailing how itwill comply with section 13 1 of WRDA 2020.

23

Monitoring of Completed Nuvigution Project.,·. Fisheries.-Within available funds for ongoing
work, the Corps is directed to continue this research at not less than the fiscal year 2021 level.

,\,/oniwring o/Completed Nuvigution Projects, Structural I feulth :\1oniwring.-The agreement
provides $4,000,000 to support the structural health monitoring program.

1Vutionul Coustul 1Hupping Program.

The agreement includes $5,000,000 for Arctic coastal

mapping needs. Additionally, the agreement reiterates Senate direction on the notification requirement.

Pe1:f<Jrmunc:e Bused Budgeting Support Progrum.-Ofthe funding provided for this remaining
item. $2,500.000 shal I be used to support performance-based methods that enable robust budgeting of thehydropower program.

Rec:reutionul Fuc:ilities. -The agreement reiterates House direction.
Regionu/ 5,'ediment Aianugement. - The agreement provides $5,000,000 to continue Corps
research and development into enhanced forecasting capabilities. Funds are also provided to support
cooperative efforts between the Corps and academia to address compound flooding issues .

.\'mull. Remote. or Suhsistena 1/urhors.

The agreement emphasizes the importance of ensuringthat our country's small and low-use ports remain functional. The Corps is encouraged to consider
expediting scheduled maintenance at small and low use ports that have experienced unexpected levels of
deterioration since their last dredging .

Tuule Creek foke. KS.- The additional funding provided is for Water Injection Dredging efforts.
lipper St. Anthony Fulls. ,\4innesotu.-WRDA 2020 encouraged the Corps to continue to operate
and maintain the Upper St. Anthony Falls Lock and Dam. The Corps is further reminded that the Upper St.
Anthony Falls project remains an authorized federal project that requires routine maintenance and iseligible to compete for additional funding provided in this account.

Wuter <'ontrol ,\1unuuls - The agreement reiterates House direction .
Wuter Control Munuuls, Section 7 Dums.-The Corps is reminded that updates to water control
manuals for non-Corps owned high hazard dams are eligible for additional funding provided in theagreement where: (I) the Corps has a responsibility for flood control operations under section 7 of the
Flood Control Act of 1944; (2) the dam requires coordination of water releases with one or more otherhigh-hazard dams for flood control purposes; and (3) the dam owner is actively investigating the feasibilityof applying forecast-informed reservoir operations technology.

Wuter Operations 7echnicul Support (W07SJ.-The agreement provides $5,000,000 in addition to
the budget request to continue research into atmospheric rivers and for improved weather forecasting for
Corps reservoir and waterway projects.

IJamuge Repuirs Lo Corps Projects. The Administration is reminded that traditionally, fundingfor disaster response has been provided in supplemental appropriations legislation, including recently in2018 (Public Law 115-123), 2019 (Public Law 116-20), and 2021 (Public Law 117-43 and Public Law
117-58) and that amounts necessary to address damages at Corps projects in response to natural disasters
can be significant.

24

Accordingly, the agreement directs the Administration to fund repairs to projects damaged bynatural disasters that were included in the fiscal year 2022 budget request with available previously
appropriated emergency supplemental funds. The following table shows the project name and funding
amount requested for each project:

25

INSERT T ABLEI

26

-----

CORPS OF ENGINEERS - DAMAGE REPAIRS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)DAMAGE REPAIR
FUNDINGALABAMA
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL
TENNESSEE - TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY (TIWW), AL & MS

960
1,710

ARKANSAS
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR
DIERKS LAKE, AR
HELENA HARBOR, AR
NIMROD LAKE, AR
NORFORK LAKE, AR
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR and LA

130
100
15
525
145
275
2,540

FLORIDA
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, FL, AL and GA

480

GEORGIABUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA and AL

960
50

ILLINOISCARLYLE LAKE, IL
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL and IN
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL and IN
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL

4,800
2,964
70
1,763
6,825

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL

80

MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL

3,569

REND LAKE, IL

1,575
IOWA

CORALVILLE LAKE, IA
MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH, IA, KS, MO and NE
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA

1,225
32,372
1,900
9,100

KANSASELK CITY LAKE, KS
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS

75
3,000
9,250

CORPS OF ENG INEERS - DAMAGE REPAIRS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)DAMAGE REPAIR
FUNDINGKENTUCKYWOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY

6,000

LOUISIANA
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF and BLACK, LA
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU BODCAU DAM AND RESERVOIR, LA
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP WATERWAY, LA
BAYOU TECHE, LA
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA
J. BENNETI JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA
WALLACE LAKE, LA

2,066
6,100
350
5,900
1,100
3,000
1,754
22,147
3,300
400
5,000
7,140
160

MISSISSIPPI

150
750

OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS
MISSOURI
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAK E, MO
HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO
and ILNEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MI SSISSIPPI RIVER, MO

776

25
2,500
225
510
77
225

NEBRASKAGAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE and SD

100

NEW YORK
LITILE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY

6,900
NORTH CAROLINAMANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC

1,000
NORTH DAKOTAGARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND

1,275

CORPS OF ENG INEERS - DAMAGE REPAIRS(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)DAMAGE REPAIR
FUNDING
OKLAHOMACOPAN LAKE, OK
EUFAULA LAKE, OK
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK
HUGO LAKE, OK
HULAH LAKE , OK
KAW LAKE , OK
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK
OOLOGAH LAKE , OK
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK
WISTER LAKE, OK

580
4,990
100
20
180
250
500
1,100
25
65

SOUTH DAKOTABIG BEND DAM AND LAKE SHARPE , SD
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE , SDOAHE DAM AND LAKE OAHE, SD

2,999
10,335200

TENNESSEENORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL HARBOR, TN

525

TEXAS

3,150
1,650

CEDAR BAYOU, TX
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX
VIRGINIAATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY - DISMAL SWAMP CANAL ROUTE, VA

TOTAL, DAMAGE REPAIRS

440

192,497

Rl'(il JLATORY PRO(iRAM

The agreement includes $212,000,000 for the Regulatory Program.

Permit Application Bucklogs.~The agreement reiterates House direction.

FORMERLY llTILI/Hl SITES REMr.lllAl. ACTION PRrniRAM

The agreement includes $300,000,000 for the Fonnerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program .

Fl.OOll CONTROi. .'\Nil COASTAi. 1:MFR(il :NCILSThe agreement includes $35,000,000 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies. As the nation
experiences severe weather events more frequently, there is appreciation for the work the Corps undertakeswith this funding. The Administration is reminded that traditionally, funding for disaster response has been
provided in supplemental appropriations legislation, including recently in 2018 (Public Law 115- 123),
2019(PublicLaw ll6- 20), and2021 (Public Law ll7- 43andPublicLaw ll7- 58)andthatamounts
necessary to address damages at Corps projects in response to natural disasters can be significant. The
Administration is again reminded that it has been deficient in providing to the Committee statutorilyrequired detailed estimates of damages to Corps projects as required by Public Law 115-123 and suchreports shall be submitted to the Committees not later than 15 days after enactment of this Act and monthly
thereafter.

l:Xl'LNSl:S

The agreement includes $208,000,000 for Expenses.
Additional funds recommended in this account shall be used only to support implementation of theCorps' Civil Works program, including hiring additional full-time equivalents.

OFFICE OF Tl If: ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF TllE ARMY FOR (.'!Vil . W<>RKS

The agreement includes $5,000,000 for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Anny for Civil
Works. The agreement includes legislative language that restricts the availability of 25 percent of thefunding provided in this account until such time as at least 95 percent of the additional funding provided ineach account has been allocated to specific programs. projects, or activities. This restriction shall not affectthe roles and responsibilities established in previous fiscal years of the Office of the Assistant Secretary of
the Anny for Civil Works, the Corps headquarters, the Corps field operating agencies, or any otherexecutive branch agency .

27

A timely and accessible executive branch in the course of fulfilling its constitutional role in theappropriations process is essential. The requesting and receiving of basic, factual information, such as
budget justification materials, is vital in order to maintain a transparent and open governing process. The
agreement recognizes that some discussions internal to the executive branch are pre-decisional in nature
and, therefore, not subject to disclosure. However, the access to facts, figures, and statistics that inform
these decisions are not subject to this same sensitivity and are critical to the budget process. The
Administration shall ensure timely and complete responses to these inquiries.

Administrative Costs.- To support additional transparency in project costs, the Secretary is
directed to ensure that future budget requests specify the amount of anticipated administrative costs forindividual projects.

WAll:R lNFRASTRlJCTlJRL FlNANlT AND INNOVATION l'ROC,RAM ACCOUNT

The agreement provides $7,200,000 for the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program
Account.
The agreement makes $2,200,000 available to the Secretary for program development,
administration, and oversight, including but not limited to publishing the final fee and program rules,
criteria for project eligibility, and Notice of Funding Availability. The agreement includes $5,000,000 for
the financial assistance authorized by Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (Public Law 113-

121) program. The fiscal year 2021 Act provided funds to publish the final fee and program rules andNotice of Funding Availability. The Administration is reminded that the publication of these rules isnecessary to move forward with the program and is directed to expeditiously publish the rules.

28

GENl'RAL PROVISIONS-C<lRPS OF ENCiINELRS-CIVIL(INCLlJDING TRANSFER OF Fl!NDS)

The agreement includes a provision relating to reprogramming.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the allocation of funds.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds to carry out any contract thatcommits funds beyond the amounts appropriated for that program, project, or activity.
The agreement includes a provision funding transfers to the Fish and Wildlife Service.
The agreement includes a provision regarding certain dredged material disposal activities. The
Corps is directed to brief the Committees not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act on dredged
material disposal issues.
The agreement includes a provision regarding reallocations at a project.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this Act for reorganization of
the Civil Works program. Nothing in this Act prohibits the Corps from contracting with the National
Academy of Sciences to carry out the study authorized by section 1102 of the A WIA ( Public Law 115270).
The agreement includes a provision regarding eligibility for additional funding. Whether a project
is eligible for funding under a particular provision of additional funding is a function of the technical detailsof the project; it is not a policy decision. The Chief of Engineers is the federal government's technicalexpert responsible for execution of the Civil Works program and for offering professional advice on its
development. Therefore, the provision in this agreement clarifies that a project's eligibility for additional
funding shall be solely the professional determination of the Chief of Engineers.

29

TITLE II-DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORCENTRAi . UTAI I PR< >JECTCFNTRtd , l/TAI I PR( >JffT COM PLFTI< >N ACCOUNT

The agreement includes a total of $23,000,000 for the Central Utah Project Completion Account,which includes $16,450,000 for Central Utah Project construction, $5,000,000 for transfer to the Utah
Reclamation Mitigation and Conservatio n Account for use by the Utah Reclamatio n Mitigation andConservation Commission, and $1,550,000 for necessary expenses of the Secretary of the Interior.

81 IRl ·:t\l l OF RECLAMATION

In lieu of all House and Senate direction regarding additional funding and the fiscal year 2022
work plan, the agreement includes direction under the heading ''Additional Funding fo r Ongoing Work" in
the Water and Related Reso urces account.

WATER A ND RELATED RESOU RCES
(INC l.l llllN<i T RANSFERS OF H INDS)

The agreement provides $1,747, IO 1,000 for Water and Related Resources.
The agreement for Water and Related Resources is shown in the following table :30

e_JINSERT TABLEfl1, -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -31

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDG ET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

19,433

19,433648

21,605

20,957

2,303

2,303

RESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

19,433

19,433648

21,605

ARIZONA
AK-CHIN INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETILEMENT ACT
COLORADO RIVER BASIN - CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT

20,957COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM

2,303

SALT RIVER PROJECT649

SAN CARLOS APACHE WATER SETILEMENT

550

YUMA AREA PROJECTS

364

1,013

649

550

550

2,303
364

1,013
550

1,025

28,36429,3891,025

28,36429,389915

1,40 1

2,316

915

1,401

2,316

1,830

10,937

12,767

1,830

10,937

12,767

35

2,564

2,599

35

2,564

2,599

17,586

12,14529,731

18,086

12,14530,231CALIFORNIACACHUMA PROJECTCENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTAMERICAN RIVER DIVISIONAUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT
DELTA DIVISIONEAST TO WEST CONVEYANCE PROJECT (SJR TO DMC) APPRAISAL
STUDYEAST SIDE DIVISIONFRIANT DIVISIONSAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATIONMISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS

(500)
1,290

2,772

1,375

3,761

21,694(RAX)
SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION

7,450

2,772
3,761

5,136

1,375
20,500370

22,064

21,69429,50029,500695

8, 145SACRAMENTO RIVER BASIN FLOOD PLAIN REACTIVATIONSAN FELIPE DIVISION

1,290

20,50020,500

REPLACEMENT, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY MAINTENANCE

4,062

(500)

12,4504,062
5,136
20,500370

22,06429,50029,500695(5,000)13,145(5,000 )

128

68

196

128

68

196

494

11,19011,684494

11,19011,684SAN JOAQUIN DIVISIONSHASTA DIVISIONWATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

RESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

TRINITY RIVER DIVISION

10,361

5,230

15,591

10,361

5,230

15,591

WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS

2,251

10,84313,0942,251

10,84313,094

WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION , SAN LUIS UNIT

2,604

7,075

9,679

3,104

7,075

10,179LOS BANOS CREEK APPRAISAL STUDY

(500)
923

ORLAND PROJECTSALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT

923

923
2,000

2,000

(500)

2,546
10,000SAN GABRIEL BASIN RESTORATION FUND

923
2,546
10,000

1,162

2,535

3,697

1,162

2,535

3,697

330

44

374

330

44

374

ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT

758

4,506

5,264

758

4,506

5,264

ARMEL UNIT, P-SMBP

15

434

449

15

434

449

COLLBRAN PROJECT

148

2,686

2,834

148

2,686

2,834

COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT

265

15,092

15,357265

15,092

15,357FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT

67

133

200

67

133

200

FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT

76

8,880

8,956

76

8,880

8,956

10,05010,050

348

193

SOLANO PROJECTVENTURA RIVER PROJECTCOLORADOFRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS, ARKANSAS VALLEY CONDUITGRAND VALLEY PROJECTGRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II

10,050193
64

LEADVILLE/ ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY PROJECTMANCOS PROJECT93

NARROWS UNIT, P-SMBP

155
1,755

1,819

24,87824,878

258

351

33

33

64
93

10,050
155

348

1,755

1,819

24,87824,878

258

351

33

33
3,738

PARADOX VALLEY UNIT

771

2,967

3,738

771

2,967

PINE RIVER PROJECT

127

361

488

127

361

488

SAN LUIS VALLEY, CLOSED BASIN

100

2,950

3,050

100

2,950

3,050

SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CONEJOS DIVISION

10

20

30

10

20

30

UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT

711

169

880

711

169

880

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIES
OM&R
MANAGEMENTUPPER COLO RIVER OPERATION PROGRAM

3,250

TOTAL

RESOURCESMANAGEMENT

3,250

3,250

5,717

2,753

FINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

3,250

IDAHO
BOISE AREA PROJECTS

2,753

COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT

18,000

2,964

2,964

5,717

18,00018,000

880

27

907

880

27

907

MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS

2,654

4,557

7,211

2,654

4,557

7,211

PRESTON BENCH PROJECT

13

34

47

13

34

47

ALMENA UNIT, P-SMBP

18

1,131

1,149

18

1,131

1,149

LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECT

18,000KANSASBOSTWICK DIVISION, P-SMBP

199

1,243

1,442

199

1,243

1,442

CEDAR BLUFF UNIT, P-SMBP

13

452

465

13

452

465

GLEN ELDER UNIT, P-SMBP

18

18,51918,53718

18,51918,537

100

100

100

100

KANSAS RIVER AREA, P-SMBPKIRWIN UNIT, P-SMBP

27

387

414

27

387

414

WEBSTER UNIT, P-SMBP

18

5,010

5,028

18

5,010

5,028

WICHITA, CHENEY DIVISION

39

398

437

39

398

437

WICHITA, EQUUS BEDS DIVISION

10

10

10

8,200

188

8,012
602

10

MONTANACANYON FERRY UNIT, P-SMBP
EAST BENCH UNIT, P-SMBP
FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIEHELENA VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP
HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT

188

8,012

162

602

764

162

17,191

17,191

200

252

52

1,673

1,673

17,191
52

8,200
764
17,191

200

252

1,673

1,673

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)TOTALRESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

62

38

24

62

2,032

536

1,496

2,032

22

927

905

22

927

1,202

1,602

400

1,202

1,602

157

BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

38

24

LOWER MARIAS UNIT, P-SMBP

536

1,496

LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT

905

MILK RIVER/ST MARY DIVERSION REHABILITATION PROJECT400MISSOURI BASIN UNIT, P-SMBP

1,015

157

ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MT RURAL WATER SYSTEM

13,504

HUNTLEY PROJECT

1,172

1,015

13,504

13,504

TOTAL

1,172
13,504

107

373

480

107

373

480

105

9,875

9,980

105

9,875

9,980

AINSWORTH UNIT, P-SMBP

33

109

142

33

109

142

FRENCHMAN-CAMBRIDGE DIVN , P-SMBP

174

2,411

2,585

174

2,411

2,585

MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT

24

102

126

24

102

126

NORTH LOUP DIVISION, P-SMBP

46

198

244

46

198

244

5,435

5,858

11,293

5,435

5,858

11,293SUN RIVER PROJECTYELLOWTAIL UNIT, P-SMBPNEBRASKA

NEVADALAHONTAN BASIN PROJECTLAKE TAHOE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

115

115

115

115

LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM

595

595

3,655

3,655

NEW MEXICOCARLSBAD PROJECT

2,794

EASTERN NEW MEXICO WATER SUPPLY-UTE RESERVOIR

7,790

MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT

20,100RIO GRANDE PROJECT

2,391

RIO GRANDE PUEBLOS

1,050

6,946

9,740

2,794

7,790

17,400

6,946

9,740

10,53030,63020,10010,53030,630

6,709

9,100

2,391

6,709

9,100

1,050

1,050

17,400

1,050

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES{AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R
TUCUMCARI PROJECTRESOURCES
TOTAL

20

MANAGEMENT
15

FINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

5

20

15

5

838

838

838

838

24,56814,89139,45924,56814,89139,459

82

1,271

1,353

82

1,271

1,353

39

243

282

39

243

282

McGEE CREEK PROJECT

20

904

924

20

904

924

MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT

30

681

711

30

681

711

NORTH DAKOTADICKINSON UNIT, P-SMBPGARRISON DIVERSION UNIT, P-SMBP
HEART BUDE UNIT, P-SMBP
OKLAHOMAARBUCKLE PROJECTNORMAN PROJECT

76

289

365

76

289

365

WASHITA BASIN PROJECT

52

1,555

1,607

52

1,555

1,607

W . C. AUSTIN , ALTUS DAM

37

905

942

37

905

942

OREGONCROOKED RIVER PROJECT

314

499

813

314

499

813

DESCHUTES PROJECT

429

231

660

429

231

660

EASTERN OREGON PROJECTSKLAMATH PROJECT

721

256

977

721

256

977

19,7704,299

24,06924,7704,299

29,069

738

543

1,281

{5,000)KLAMATH , SCADA ACQUISITION, OR
ROGUE RIVER, TALENT DIVISION

738{5,000)543

1,281

TUALATIN PROJECT

382

1,856

2,238

382

1,856

2,238

UMATILLA PROJECT

567

3,100

3,667

567

3,100

3,667

WATER AND RELATED RESO URCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

RESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

SOUTH DAKOTAANGOSTURA UNIT, P-SMBP

10BELLE FOURCHE UNIT, P-SMBP

130
190

KEYHOLE UNIT, P-SMBP
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM, IA, MN, SD

586

MNI WICONI PROJECTOAHE UNIT, P-SMBP
RAPID VALLEY PROJECTRAPID VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP

119

892
1,637
776
9,220

9,220

MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECTSHADE HILL UNIT, P-SMBP

882
1,507

10
130
190
21,914

882
1,507
586

892
1,637
776
21,91413
17,01013
17,010

90

90

86
224
834

86
224
715

90
86
224
834

82

4
124

13
17,01013
17,010

90
86
224
715

119

82

4
124

4
42

911
1,062
703

1,709
(798)
52
23

369
178
188
441
3,868

109
19
56
195
3,336

TEXAS

CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT

442

LOWER RIO GRANDE WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT

911

BALMORHEA PROJECTISLAND MAIN LATERAL CONCRETE LINING PROJECT

52
23

1,010

OGDEN RIVER PROJECT

109
19
56
195

260
159
132
246

PROVO RIVER PROJECT

3,336

532

NUECES RIVER PROJECTSAN ANGELO PROJECT

680

1,010
680

1,709
(798)
1,062
703

UTAH

HYRUM PROJECT
MOON LAKE PROJECTNEWTON PROJECT

260
159
132
246
532

369
178
188
441
3,868

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R
SANPETE PROJECT85

18

SCOFIELD PROJECT

344

153

STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECTTOTALRESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

103

85

18

103

497

344

153

497

TOTAL

500

60

560

500

60

560

WEBER BASIN PROJECT

1,273

942

2,215

1,273

942

2,215

WEBER RIVER PROJECT

108

212

320

108

212

320

7,270

20,71527,9857,770

20,715(1,500)(2,000)WASHINGTONCOLUMBIA BASINODESSA SUBAREA(1,500)WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTSYAKIMA PROJECTYAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECTWAPATO IRRIGATION PROJECT, WA

28,485(2,000)

372

160

532

372

160

532

1,887

7,040

8,927

1,887

7,040

8,927

25,50025,50026,45026,450(1,040)(1,040)(1,990)(1,990)

78

2,235

2,313

WYOMINGBOYSEN UNIT, P-SMBP

78

2,235

2,313

BUFFALO BILL DAM, DAM MODIFICATION, P-SMBP

9

5,941

5,950

9

5,941

5,950

KENDRICK PROJECT

79

3,841

3,920

79

3,841

3,920

NORTH PLATIE PROJECT

93

2,487

2,580

93

2,487

2,580

NORTH PLATIE AREA 0/M, P-SMBP

121

6,787

6,908

121

6,787

6,908

OWL CREEK UNIT, P-SMBP

4

102

106

4

102

106

RIVERTON UNIT, P-SMBP

12

716

728

12

716

728

SHOSHONE PROJECT

34

1,293

1,327

34

1,293

1,327

333,604

416,742

750,346

382,762

416,742

799,504

SUBTOTAL, PROJECTSWATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

RESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

3,000

15,0007,000(3,900)(700)
164,300
11,0003,000

REGIONAL PROGRAMSADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK:RURAL WATERFISH PASSAGE AND FISH SCREENSSACRAMENTO RIVER FISH SCREEN PROGRAMUPPER YAKIMA BULL TROUT RESEARCH FACILITY, WA
WATER CONSERVATION AND DELIVERYENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR COMPLIANCE
FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND REHABILITATIONAGING INFRASTRUCTURE

15,0007,000(3,900)(700)
164,300
11,0001,000

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROGRAM

1,000

COLORADO RIVER COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES

21,400COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, TITLE I
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT, TITLE II,

17,5747,000

BASIN WIDECOLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 5

3,164

COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 8

3,322
740

COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

7,469

1,000

100

1,000

100

21,40021,40017,574100
100
21,40017,574

17,574

7,000

7,000

10,633

3,164

3,322

3,322

3,322

740

740

740

7,000
7,469

10,633DAM SAFETY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT DAM SAFETY PROGRAM

1,300

1,300

1,300

1,300

INITIATE SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION

182,500

182,500

182,500

182,500

SAFETY EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS

23,28423,28423,28423,284ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM(Bureauwide)
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM(Platte River)
ENDANGERED SPEC RECOVERY IMPL PROG (Upper Colo & San Juan
Riv Basins)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
EXAM OF EXISTING STRUCTURES

2,575

2,575

2,575

2,575

4,950

4,950

4,950

4,950

5,700

5,700

5,700

5,700

1,711

1,711

1,711

12,727

12,727

1,711
12,727

12,727

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTFACILITIES
OM&R

GENERAL PLANNING STUDIESRESOURCESMANAGEMENTTOTALRESOURCESMANAGEMENT

2,195

2,195

2,195

FINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

2,195

INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETILEMENTAAMODT LITIGATION

10,00010,00010,00010,000BLACKFEET INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETILEMENT

40,00040,00040,00040,00012,772

12,772

56,342

62,342

16,19016,19016,19045,21845,21845,218CROW TRIBE INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETILEMENT

12,772

NAVAJO-GALLUP WATER SUPPLY PROJECT

51,342LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAMLOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM

5,000

971

MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS

20,00020,00020,000

NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING

2,219

2,219

2,219

POWER PROGRAM SERVICES
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROG

67,342
16,19045,218971

971

NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAMOPERATION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT

12,772
5,000

971
20,000
2,219

836

3,264

4,100

836

3,264

4,100

3,121

307

3,428

3,121

307

3,428

610

206

816

610

206

816

27,50027,50027,50027,500

PUBLIC RISK/LAW ENFORCEMENT - SITE SECURITY
RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

5,508

5,508

5,508

5,508

RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION

1,131

1,131

1,131

1,131

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM

7,850

9,500

18,350SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

18,00018,00021,500

80

80

80

1,250

9,950

UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES - TECHNICAL SUPPORT

1,650

1,250

EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM

1,650

20,00021,50080

1,250

11,200

WATERSMART PROGRAM:
WATERSMART GRANTS

15,00015,000

WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM

2,318

2,318

45,5002,318

COOPERATIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT

2,250

2,250

5,000

5,000

BASIN STUDIES

13,50013,50013,50013,500DROUGHT RESPONSES & COMPREHENSIVE DROUGHT PLANS

16,50016,50020,00020,000

TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION & REUSE PROGRAM

4,500

4,500

53,19353,19345,5002,318

WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)BUDGET REQUESTRESOURCESFACILITIESMANAGEMENT
OM&R

TOTAL

RESOURCESMANAGEMENTFINAL BILL
FACILITIES
OM&R

TOTAL

SUBTOTAL, REGIONAL PROGRAMS

342,702

286,002628,704

659,495

288,102

947,597

TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES

676,306

702,744

1,379,050

1,042,257

704,844

1,747,101

Additionul Fundingj(>r OnJ.;oing Work - The agreement includes funds above the budget request
for Water and Related Resources studies, projects, and activities. This funding is for additional work thateither was not included in the budget request or was inadequately budgeted. Priority in allocating thesefunds should be given to advance and complete ongoing work. including preconstruction activities andwhere environmental compliance has been completed; improve water supply reliability; improve water
deliveries; enhance national, regional, or local economic development; promote job growth; advance tribal
and nontribal water settlement studies and activities; or address critical backlog maintenance andrehabilitation activities.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading "Water Conservation and Delivery",$ I 17.250,000 shall be for water storage projects as authorized in section 4007 of the Wl lN Act (Public Law
114- 322).
Of the additional funding provided under the heading '·Water Conservation and Delivery",$25,000,000 shall be for implementing the Drought Contingency Plan in the Lower Colorado River Basinto create or conserve recurring Colorado River water that contributes to supplies in Lake Mead and other
Colorado River water reservoirs in the Lower Colorado River Basin or projects to improve the long-term
efficiency ofoperations in the Lower Colorado River Basin, consistent with the Secretary's obligations
under the Colorado River Drought Contingency Plan Authorization Act (Public Law 116- 14) and re latedagreements. None of these funds shall be used for the operation of the Yuma Desalting Plant and nothing inthis section shall be construed as limiting existing or future opportunities to augment the water supplies of
the Colorado River.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading ··water Conservation and De livery", not lessthan $5,000,000 shall be for construction activities related to projects found to be feasible by the Secretary
and that are ready to initiate for the repair of critical Reclamation canals where operational conveyancecapacity has been seriously impaired by factors such as age or land subsidence, especially those that would
imminently jeopardize Reclamation's ability to meet water delivery obligations.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading "Environmental Restoration orCompliance", not less than $ I 0,000,000 shall be for activities authorized under sections 4001 and 40 IO of
the WIIN Act (Public Law 114-322 ) or as set forth in federal-state plans for restoring threatened andendangered fish species affected by the operation of Reclamation 's water projects.
Of the additional funding provided under the heading ·'Fish Passage and Fish Screens",$6,000,000 shall be for the Anadromous Fish Screen Program.
Reclamatio n is directed to provide to the Committees no t later than 45 days after enactment of thisAct a report delineating how these funds are to be distributed, in which phase the work is to beaccomplished, and an explanation of the criteria and rankings used to justify each allocation.
Reclamation is reminded that the following activities are eligible to compete for funding under theappropriate heading: activities authorized under Indian Water Rights Settlements; aquifer recharging efforts
to address the ongoing backlog of re lated projects: all authorized rural water projects, inc luding those with32

tribal components, those with non-tribal components, and those with both; conjunctive use projects andother projects to maximize groundwater storage and beneficial use; ongoing work, including
preconstruction activities, on projects that provide new or existing water supplies through additional
infrastructure; and activities authorized under section 206 of Public Law 113-235.

Aquifer Rechurge.---Of the funds provided in this account above the budget request, $18,000,000
shall be for Aquifer Storage and Recovery projects focused on ensuring sustainable water supply andprotecting water quality of aquifers in the Great Plains Region with shared or multi-use aquifers, formunicipal. agricultural irrigation. industrial. recreation, and domestic users.

Boulder ( 'unyon Project, /)um Fund
Klamath Basin Project.

The agreement reiterates Senate direction.

Reclamation is encouraged to continue collaborative agreements withstate agencies to support ground water monitoring in the Klamath Basin. Further, Reclamation is directed toconsider restoring agreements with Klamath Basin tribes to support surface monitoring efforts and toprovide to the Committees not later than 90 days after enactment of this Act a briefing on the status of suchagreements.

Research and /)evelopment: /)esulinution and Water Purification Progrum.

Of the funding

provided for this program, $ I 0,500.000 shall be for desalination projects as authorized in section 4009(a) of
Public Law 114--322.

Research and l)evelopment: Science and Technology l'rogrum. A irhorne .\'now Ohservutory
Pro;;rum.

The agreement provides an additional $2,000,000 for this program. which advances snow andwater supply forecasting.

Research and /)evelopment: Science and Technology l'rogrum: Snow Jlodeling l)utu
l'rocessing.- The agreement provides an additional $1,500,000 to support Reclamation's efforts to support
the U.S. Department of Agriculture and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration efforts toimprove real-time and derived snow water equivalent information such that it can be immediately used forwater resources decision-making.

Rural Water l'r<.>jec/s.- Reclamation is reminded that voluntary funding in excess of legallyrequired cost shares for rural water projects is acceptable, but shall not be used by Reclamation as acriterion for allocating additional funding provided in this agreement or for budgeting in future years.

Sulton Sea- Reclamation is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 90 days afterenactment of this Act a briefing on Reclamation ' s plan for managing the air quality impacts of theestimated 8. 75 square miles of lands it owns that will emerge from the receding Sea over the next decade.

Sun .Joaquin River Restoration.- Permanent appropriations, newly available for the prog ram in
fiscal year 2020, should not supplant continued annual appropriations. Reclamation is encouraged toinclude adequate funding in future budget requests.

( !pper Rio Grande Bus in Study.- The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction.
Verde River Basin.- The agreement reiterates House direction .

33

WaterS:'v!ARJ' Program: 7itle .\-VJ Water Redamation & Reuse Progrnm.- Ofthe additional
funding provided for this program, $17,500,000 shall be for water recycling and reuse projects as
authorized in section 4009(c) of Public Law 114- 322.

CENTRAL V /\I.I.FY PR< >Jl:CT RFSTORJ\TlO

Fl IND

The agreement provides $56,499,000 for the Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.

C/\LIFORNIA BA Y-Dl:I.Tc\ RLSTOR/\T!ON( INCl.lJl)IN(i TR/\NSFLRS 01· FlJNDS)

The agreement provides $33,000,000 for the California Bay-Delta Restoration Program.

POI.ICY AND ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $64,400,000 for Policy and Administration.

/\!JMINISTRATIVF PROVISION

The agreement includes a provision limiting Reclamation to purchase not more than thirty
passenger vehicles for replacement only .

34

GENERAL PROVISIONS-DEPARTMENT OF TIIE lNTl :RIOR

The agreement includes a provision outlining the circumstances under which the Bureau of
Reclamation may reprogram funds.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the San Luis Unit and Kesterson Reservoir in
California.
The agreement includes a provision regarding section 9504(e) of the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the C ALFED Bay-Delta Authorization Act.
The agreement includes a provision regarding section 9106(g)(2) of the Omnibus Public Land
Management Act of 2009.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief
Act of 1991.
The agreement includes a provision regarding the Reclamation Projects Authorization andAdjustment Act of 1992.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this Act for certain activities.

35

TITLE 111-DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

The agreement provides $44.855 ,624.000 for the Department of Energy to fund programs in its
primary mission areas of science, energy, environment. and national security.

C<>N<iRLSSI<>NAI, DIRl:CTl<lN

The Committees count on a timely and accessible executive branch in the course of fulfilling its
constitutional role in the appropriations process. Requesting and receiving basic. factual information,
including budget justification materials and responses to inquiries, is vital in order to ensure transparency
and accountability. While some discussions internal to the executive branch may be pre-decisional in natureand therefore not subject to release. the Committees' access to the facts, figures, and statistics that informthe decisions of the executive branch are not subject to those same sensitivities. The Committees shall haveready and timely access to information from the Department, Federally Funded Research and Development
Centers, and any recipient of funding from this Act. Further, the Committees appreciate the ability for open
and direct communication with all recipients of funding from this Act. and the Department shall notinterfere with such communication and shall not penalize recipients of funding from this Act for such
communication.

Rl cl'R(l(iRAMMIN(i Rl:()lJIREMl :NTS

The agreement carries the Department's reprogramming autho rity in statute to ensure that the
Department carries out its programs consistent with congressional direction . The Department shall , whenpossible, submit consolidated, cumulative notifications to the Committees.

Definitivn.-A reprogramming includes the reallocation of funds from one program , project, or
activity to another within an appropriation. For construction projects, a reprogramming constitutes thereallocation of funds from one construction project to another project or a change of $2,000,000 or 10
percent, whichever is less, in the scope of an approved project.

FIN ANC IAL Rl:PORTIN(i AND MANA( il-:MI-:NTThe Department is still not in compliance with its statutory requirement to submit to Congress, atthe time that the budget request is submitted, a future-years energy program that covers the fiscal year of
the budget request and the four succeeding years, as directed in the fiscal year 2012 Act. In addition. theDepartment has an outstanding requirement to submit a plan to become fully compliant with thisrequirement. The Department is directed to provide these requirements not later than 30 days afterenactment of this Act. The Department may not obligate more than 95 percent of amounts provided to the36Chief Financial Officer until the Department provides to the Committees a briefing on a plan to become
fully compliant with this requirement.

J,Vorking Capital FundThe agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.

( ·ongressional Reporting Requirements.- The Department is directed to provide quarterly updates
to the Committees on this issue. Further, the Department is directed to provide all Congressionally required
reports digitally in addition to traditional correspondence.

SB//? and STl'R Programs.- The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.
Mortgaging Future-Year Awards. -The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.
(ieneral !'Ian/ Projects.- The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.
Compelilive Procedures.- The agreement reiterates House direction on th is topic.
WorkfrJrce l)evelopment.-The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.

C'ROSSClr!TIN<i INITIATIVL:S

l:·nergy Storage.- The Department is directed to carry out these activities in accordance withsections 320 I and 3202 of the Energy Act of 2020. The agreement provides not less than $500,000,000 forenergy storage. including not less than $347.000,000 from the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy (EERE), not less than $120.000,000 from the Office of Electricity (OE). not less than $5,000,000
from the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), not less than $4,000.000 from the
Office of Nuclear Energy (NE). and not less than $24,000,000 from the Office of Science. The agreement
reiterates Senate direction related to periodic updates on the Energy Storage Grand Challenge (ESGCJ and
ESGC roadmap.

Critical Winerals. -The agreement provides not less than $167,000,000 for research,development, demonstration, and commercialization activities on the development of alternatives to,recycling of, and efficient production and use of critical minerals, including not less than $100,000,000
from EERE, not less than $50,000,000 from FECM, and not less than $17,000.000 from the Office of
Science.

Industrial Decarhoni:::alion.-The agreement provides not less than $510.000.000 for industrial
decarbonization activities. including not less than $240.000,000 from EERE, not less than $250,000,000
from FECM, and not less than $20,000,000 from the Office of Science. The agreement provides not lessthan $25,000,000 for low-carbon feedstocks in the steel, cement, concrete, and other heavy industrial
sectors and not less than $25 ,000,000 for clean heat alte rnatives for industrial processes.

Grid :llodernizalion. - The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction on Grid
Modernization and the Grid Modernization Lab Consortium.

( 'arhon Dioxide Removal. - The agreement provides not less than $104,000,000 for research,development, and demonstration of carbon dioxide removal technologies. including not less than
$20.000,000 from EERE, not less than $49,000,000 from FECM , and not less than $35,000,000 from the37

Office of Science. Within available funds for carbon dioxide removal, the agreement provides not less than
$75,000,000 for direct air capture. The Department is directed to coordinate these activities among EERE,
FECM, and the Office of Science.

l lydrogen 1,·nergy und Fuel ( 'ell ( 'oordinution. - The Department is directed to coordinate its
efforts in hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies across its various departments and offices in order tomaximize the effectiveness of investments in hydrogen-related activities. This coordination shall include
E ERE, FECM, NE, OE, the Office of Science, and the Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy.

/ larmjul Algal !Jlooms. - The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.
1)()/,· and USO.I lnterugenq Working Uroup. -The agreement reiterates House direction on this

topic.

J,andjill J,'missions. - The agreement reiterates House direction on this topic.
CO VJ J) 19 Research /)e/ays.- The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction on this topic.
lnteragency TYorking Uroup on Coal and Power Plant Communities and f;conomic
Revitalization - The Department is directed to include an itemization of funding for these activities infuture budget requests.

Sexual I Jarussment.-The agreement reiterates Senate direction on this topic.
The agreement provides no direction on Equity and Justice .
The agreement provides no direction on the Civilian Climate Corps.

38

ENERGY PROGRAMS
ENrnGY EFFICIENCY AND Rl :NEWABL.E ENER(iY

The agreement provides $3,200,000,000 for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
The agreement provides not less than $ I 0,000.000 for the Energy Transitions Initiative.
The agreement provides up to $5,000.000 for university-led research in order to increase recycling
rates for polyethylene plastics and develo p conversion of waste polyethylene to more recyclable andbiodegradable plastics.
The agreement provides $ I 0,000,000 for a consortium of universities in the United States that hasestablished agreements with universities in Canada and Mexico to conduct research on a broad array ofenergy sources and topics.
SllSTAI ABLE TRANSPORTATIONThe Vehicle Technologies. Bioenergy Technologies. and Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies
offices are directed to work closely with the Department of Agriculture and the private sector to develop
common metrics to evaluate and compare the impact of the emerging clean hydrogen industry o n theethanol and biodiesel industries.
Within available funds, the agreement provides not less than $30,000.000 to continue theSuperTruck Ill program .

Vehicle frchnoloRies.-The agreement provides not less than $200 ,000,000 for Battery andElectrification Technologies.
The agreement provides up to $15,000,000 to advance energy efficiency and low emissions
technologies for off-road application vehicles. including commercial. of which up to $5,000,000 is for fluid
power systems.
The agreement provides up to$ I 0,000,000 to support research and development relevant to twostroke opposed-piston engines.
The agreement provides not less than $80,000.000 for Technology Integration, previously called
Outreach, Deployment, and Analysis. Within available funds, the agreement provides not less than
$50.000,000 for deployment through the Clean Cities program, including not less than $30,000,000 forcompetitive g rants.
The agreement provides not less than $40.000.000 for Energy Efficient Mobility System s.
The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 for e lectric vehicle workforce development
activities and reiterates House direction on the related report and roadmap.
The agreement reiterates House direction on the assessment and briefing related to electric vehicle
charging infrastructure in underserved or disadvantaged communities.
The agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for research o n direct inj ection, engine technology, andthe use of dimethyl ether as fuel.

39

The agreement provides up to $10,000,000 to address technical barriers to the increased use ofnatural gas vehicles, including for applications in on-road vehicles, off-road vehicles, maritime, or rail.

Bioenergy Technologies.-The agreement provides not less than $42,000,000 for Feedstock
Technologies and the Biomass Feedstock National User Facility.
The agreement provides not less than $40,000,000 for advanced algal systems to sustain theinvestment in development of algal biofuels.
The agreement provides $3,000,000 for research, at commercially relevant processing scales, into
affordable wood chip fractionation technologies and other processing improvements relevant tobiorefineries in order to enable economic production of cellulose nanomaterials and economic upgrading ofhemicelluloses and lignin.
Within available funds for Conversion Technologies, the agreement provides not less than
$23,000,000 for the Agile Bio Foundry, including not less than $3,000,000 to continue developing methods
and technologies to advance biological engineering. to support expanded focus on artificial intelligence andmachine learning and software development, to improve the predictive design of organisms and pathways,
to build tools accessible to the wider scientific community, and for the purchase of state-of-technology
instrumentation that will enable better and more expansive collaborations. Within available funds forConversion Technologies, the agreement provides $5,000,000 to demonstrate the use of and improve theefficiency of community-scale digesters with priority given for projects in states and tribal areas that haveadopted statutory requirements for the diversion of a high percentage of food material from municipal
waste streams.
The agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for continued support of the development and testing of
new domestic manufactured low-emission, high-efficiency, residential wood heaters that supply easily
accessed and affordable renewable energy and have the potential to reduce the national costs associatedwith thermal energy.

11,ydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies.-The agreement provides $157,500,000 for Hydrogen and
Fuel Cell Technologies to maintain a diverse program which focuses on early-, mid-, and late-stage
research and development and technology acceleration including market transformation.
The agreement provides not less than $60,000,000 for technologies to advance hydrogen use forheavy-duty transportation and industrial applications.
The agreement provides $2,500,000 for research that tightly couples advanced modeling.
characterization, and controlled synthesis to elucidate the key mechanisms in this technology. This researchshould include participation by a university with demonstrated expertise with perovskite materials.

40

The agreement provides not less than $15,000,000 to cost share the Office of Nuclear Energyhydrogen demonstration project, including for high temperature electrolysis research and development at anational laboratory . The agreement provides up to $14,000,000 to support ongoing efforts for high- andlow-temperature electrolyzer development.
The agreement provides not less than $ I0,000,000 for solar fuels research and development.
The agreement provides not less than $40,000,000 for System Development and Integration,
including not less than$ I 0,000.000 for Safety, Codes, and Standards.
The agreement provides not less than $45,000.000 for Hydrogen Technologies.
The Department shall continue research on novel onboard hydrogen tank systems, as well as
trailer delivery systems to reduce costs of delivered hydrogen.
RLNFWi\HI.I' LNl' R(iY,\'olar 1':nergy J'echnologies.- The agreement provides not less than $50,000,000 for Systems
Integration and not less than $75,000,000 for Photovoltaic Technologies.
The agreement provides not less than $25.000,000 for additional investments in Cadmium
Telluride to implement goals of a technology roadmap developed by the consortium. The agreement
provides not less than $25,000,000 for perovskites.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 for the Department to expand work to lower
barriers to solar adoption for low-income households, renters. multifamily homes, and racially diverse
communities.
The agreement provides not less than $40,000.000 for Balance of System Soft Costs efforts
focused on reducing the time and costs for planning, siting, permitting, inspecting, and interconnecting
distributed and large-scale solar or storage projects through standardized requirements, online application
systems, technical assistance, and grant awards to localities that voluntarily adopt the Solar Automated
Permit Processing platform. Within available funds for Balance of Systems Soft Costs, $5,000,000 is for
the National Community Solar Partnership program .

Wind J,'nergy Technologies.- The agreement provides not less than $ I 0,000.000 for distributed
wind technologies.
The agreement provides not less than $ I 0,000,000 to support additional project development andpre-construction activities for offshore wind demonstration projects to help ensure success. The Department
is directed to support innovative offshore wind demonstration projects to optimize their development,
design. construction methods, testing plans, and economic value proposition. The Department is directed tosupport the advancement of innovative technologies for offshore wind development including freshwater,
deep water. shallow water, and transitional depth installations.

41

The agreement provides up to $6.000,000 for Centers of Excellence focused on offshore windenergy engineering, infrastructure, supply chain, transmission, and other pertinent issues required tosupport offshore wind in the United States.
The agreement provides direction related to advanced manufacturing of wind blades andcomponents within Advanced Manufacturing.
The agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for the Wind Energy Technologies Office and the Water
Power Technologies Office to support university-led research projects related to resource characterization,site planning, feasibility assessments, community outreach, and planning for long-term environmental
monitoring for applications of marine energy and floating offshore wind technologies to support sustainableoffshore energy deployment and scalable aquaculture production.
The agreement provides up to $30,000,000 for research and development that can lead todemonstration of onsite manufacturing of turbine system components to enable turbine construction withblade length greater than 75 meters.
The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 for the National Wind Technology Center and
up to $5,000,000 for research and operations of the Integrated Energy System at Scale.
The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 for the Department to prioritize early-stage
research on materials and manufacturing methods and advanced components that will enable high quality
wind resources to compete in the marketplace without the need for subsidies. and on activities that will
accelerate fundamental offshore-specific research and development such as those that target technology anddeployment challenges unique to U.S. waters.

Water Power Technologies.- The agreement provides not less than $4 7.000,000 for Hydropower
Technologies and not less than $1 12,000,000 for Marine and Hydrokinetic Technologies.
The agreement provides $5,000.000 to continue industry-led research. development.
demonstration, and deployment efforts of innovative technologies for fish passage and invasive fish species
removal at hydropower facilities, as well as analysis of hydro logic climate science and water basin data tounderstand the impact of climate change on hydropower.
The agreement provides up to$ I 0,000,000 for the purposes of sections 242 and 243 of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005.
The agreement provides not less than $24,000,000 for the Powering the Blue Economy initiative.
The agreement provides up to $20.000.000 to address infrastructure needs at marine energy
technology testing sites, including general plant projects, and to support for planning activities for thestaged development of an ocean current test facility. The agreement provides up to $5,000.000 for the
Department to continue its support of operations at the Atlantic Marine Energy Center to accelerate thetransition of wave and tidal energy technologies to market.

42

The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction on industry-led competitive solicitations toincrease energy capture; foundational research activities led by universities and other research institutions
affiliated with the National Marine Energy Centers; the continued development and construction ofan open
water, fully energetic, grid connected wave energy test facility; and the continuation of the TestingExpertise and Access for Marine Energy Research initiative.
The Department is directed to continue to coordinate with the U.S. Navy and other federal
agencies on marine energy technology development for national security and other applications .
The agreement provides $5.000,000 for the environmental analyses and engineering of potential
run-of-river hydrokinetic facilities at two sites with high electricity costs and diesel use. as determined by
the Secretary.

Geothermal 1echnologies.-The agreement provides up to $75.000.000 for enhanced geothermal
system demonstrations and next-generation geothermal demonstration projects in diverse geographic areas.
The agreement provides not less than $10,000,000 for research, development, and demonstration efforts
relevant to super-hot rock geothermal technology. The agreement provides not less than $17,000,000 for
Low Temperature and Coproduced Resources. The Department is directed to continue its efforts to identify
and characterize geothermal resources in areas with no obvious surface expressions.

Renewahle lc·nergy ( iricl Integration.

The agreement includes a new control point and provides$..J.0.000,000 for activities to facilitate the integration of grid activities among renewable energy
technologies. Further. within available funds. the agreement provides $10.000,000 for development anddemonstration of an "energyshed" management system that addresses a discrete geographic area in which
renewable sources currently provide a large portion of electric energy needs, where grid capacity
constraints result in curtailment of renewable generation, and with very substantial existing deployment ofinteractive smart meters. The " energyshed" design should achieve a high level of integration , resilience.
and reliability among all energy uses, including both on-demand and long-time energy scales, transmission ,and distribution of electricity.
l'Nl'R(iY EFFICll:NCY

Advanced Jlanufacturing.-The agreement provides $25.000.000 for the Energy-Water
Desalination Hub and provides up to $10.000 ,000 to be used to issue a competitive solicitation for
university and industry-led teams to improve the efficiency of industrial drying processes.
The agreement provides $5.000.000 to expand the technical assistance provided for water andwastewater treatment and reiterates House direction on the related briefing. The Department is directed tosummarize its efforts to work with key stakeholders in this area, including wastewater and drinking waterproviders. to maximize the investment of these dollars to high priority targets. The agreement provides$20,000.000 for research and development on technologies to achieve energy efficiency of water andwastewater treatment plants, including the deployment of alternative energy sources, as appropriate.

43

The agreement provides $ l 0,000,000 for the development of advanced tooling for lightweightautomotive components to lead the transition to electric vehicle and mobility solutions to meet the nationalurgency for market adoption.
The agreement provides up to $20,000,000 to continue the development of additive manufacturing
involving nanocellulosic feedstock materials made from forest products to overcome challenges to the costand deployment of building, transportation, and energy technologies.
The Department is directed to further foster the partnership between the national laboratories,
universities. and industry to use bio-based thermoplastics composites, such as micro- and nanocellulosic
materials, and large-area 3~D printing to overcome challenges to the cost and deployment of building,transportation, and energy technologies.
The agreement provides up to $20,000,000 for the Advanced Manufacturing Office to work incoordination with the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office to support high-impact activities for thedevelopment and deployment of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, including on the economic use of
low-carbon hydrogen for industrial processes .
The agreement provides $25,000,000 for the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) andthe Carbon Fiber Technology Facility. Within available funds for MDF, the agreement provides $5,000,000
for the development of processes for materials solutions.
The Department is directed to support activities for conversion and retooling of manufacturingindustrial facilities to support the domestic auto industry and to retain American competitiveness inbuilding the vehicles of the future.
The agreement provides $20,000,000 for process-informed science, design, and engineering
materials and devices in harsh environments, including nuclear environments, and to demonstrateintegrated energy systems applied to decarbonized steel making and refractory materials, including net zeroor high-temperature hydrogen-based decarbonization. The agreement provides$ l 0,000,000 for continued
research for dynamic catalyst science coupled with data analytics.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 for electric vehicle battery manufacturing. The
Department is directed to prioritize funding to partnerships and consortiums that include private industry,
universities, and nonprofit organizations with expertise in electric vehicle manufacturing, electric vehicle
workforce development, and regional innovation development.
The agreement provides $ I 0,000,000 for research, development. and demonstration activities thatwill enable U.S. manufacturers to increase the recovery, recycling, reuse, and remanufacturing of plastics,
metals, electronic waste, and fibers .
The agreement provides no direction related to environmental product declarations.

44

The agreement provides up to $20,000,000 for the Industrial Assessment Center (!AC) program
and reiterates Senate direction. Within the funds provided for the IA Cs, the agreement provides up to$4,000,000 for applied technical assistance and the purchase and pilot testing of innovative technology andreiterates Senate direction.
The agreement provides not less than $13,000,000 to provide ongoing support for the Combined
Heat and Power ( CHP) Technical Assistance Partnerships ( T APs) and related CHP Technical Partnership
activities, including not less than $5,000,000 for the T APs and not less than $7,000,000 for related CHP
activities. The Department is directed to collaborate with industry on the potential energy efficiency andenergy security gains to be realized with district energy systems.
The agreement provides up to$ I 0,000,000 for the issuance of a competitive solicitation forindustry-led teams to improve the efficiency and sustainability of metal extraction through artificial
intelligence and machine learning, giving priority to gold and silver extraction activities.
The Department is directed to carry out activities in accordance with title VI of the Energy Act of2020.
The agreement provides $5,000,000 to support sustainable chemistry research and development.
The agreement provides $4,000,000 to support additive manufacturing work on large wind bladesthat will allow for rapid prototyping, tooling, fabrication, and testing; $7,000,000 for additive
manufacturing of wind turbine components; and $18,000,000 for advanced wind turbine blade
manufacturing research, including additive composite tip technology, automation, and sustainability.
The agreement provides not less than $7,000,000 to continue technology development to convert
lithium chloride from geothermal brine into lithium hydroxide that will inform the design of a commercialscale facility that will both extract lithium from geothermal brine and convert the lithium in geothermalbrine into the lithium hydroxide.
The agreement provides $5,000,000 to continue to develop and industrialize low-cost polymer
infiltration processes for the fabrication of ceramic matrix composites for high-temperature components,
giving priority to silicon carbide components.
The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 to apply the Office of Science's leadershipcomputing facility expertise in machine learning to increase efficiencies in large scale, high rate,
aerostructures manufacturing.

Building lechnologies.-The agreement provides not less than $55,000,000 for the Commercial
Building Integration program for core research and development of more cost-effective integration
techniques and technologies that could help the transition toward deep retrofits. The agreement provides
not less than $45,000,000 for Residential Building Integration (RBI) and reiterates Senate directions related
to RBI.

45

The agreement provides not less than $58,000,000 for Equipment and Building Standards.
including not less than $12,000,000 for Building Energy Codes.
The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 for Buildings-to-Grid integration research anddevelopment consistent with a transactive energy system and in coordination with the Office ofElectricity's transactive energy systems program to accelerate grid-enabled buildings and reduce barriers todynamic. responsive building energy use that can meet customers· needs and support a reliable electric
grid .
The agreement provides up to $30,000.000 for solid-state lighting. If the Secretary finds solidstate lighting technology eligible for the Twenty-First Century Lamp prize, specified under section 655 of
the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. up to $5,000,000 shall be made available to fund theprize or additional projects for solid-state lighting research and development.
The agreement provides up to $5,000.000 for the establishment of a Heat Pump Consortium tointegrate and deploy heat pump technologies in a joint industry partnership.
Significant research and development gaps remain to transition to lower-carbon and zero-carbon
fuels in buildings. The Department is encouraged to continue to explore research and development that canadvance systems and appliances, driven by delivered fuels including renewable fuels and hydrogen, to meet
consumer demand for high efficiency and environmentally friendly products in residential and commercial
building applications. including heat pumps with power generation and water heating, increased utilizationof renewable fuels and hydrogen. appliance venting, hybrid fuel-fired and electrically-driven systems,
distributed carbon capture, mitigation of behind-the-meter methane emissions, and on-site (micro)
combined heat and power to include cooling and integration with renewables.
The agreement reiterates House direction on a briefing outlining the opportunities and chalJenges
in deploying energy efficient building technologies to public buildings and buildings that host providers.
such as food banks, serving community needs.
Within available funds for Emerging Technologies, the Department is encouraged to makefunding available for Heating, Ventilation. and Air Conditioning (HVAC) and Refrigeration research,development and deployment, including heat pumps, heat pump water heaters, and boilers. The Department
shalJ focus its efforts to address whole building energy performance and cost issues to inform efforts toadvance beneficial electrification and greenhouse gas mitigation without compromising building energy
performance.
The agreement provides up to $50,000,000 for advanced HY AC and dehumidification
manufacturing scale-up projects.
The agreement reiterates Senate direction related to the Grid-interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB)
program.

46

Federal Fner>;,y Management Program.-The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction
related to energy performance contracts management.

Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program.- Within available funds for the State Energy
Program , the agreement provides $500.000 for technical assistance to continue the Sustainable Wastewater
Infrastructure of the Future Accelerator.
Within available funds for the Weatherization Assistance Program ( WAP), the agreement provides$3,000.000 to support community-scale weatherization and reiterates House direction for this activity.
The agreement provides $1,000.000 be made available to W AP grant recipients that havepreviously worked with the Department via the Weatherization Innovation Pilot Program, for the purposeof developing and implementing state and regional programs to treat hannful substances, including
vem1iculite.

Lnergy Future Cirants. -The agreement provides funds to support state-, local-, and tribal-levelapproaches to meeting energy needs at the local level, including through financial and technical assistanceto eligible entities for energy system planning and analysis and conducting stakeholder engagement.
Eligible entities shall include states, local governments. communities, U.S. territories. and tribes. The
Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act abriefing on its implementation plan for this program.

Congressionally l>irec:ted Spending

The agreement provides $77,047.000 for the following listof projects that provide for research. development, and demonstration for Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy activities or programs. Recipients are reminded that statutory cost sharing requirements
may apply to these projects.

47

INSERT TABbEI

48

Congressionally Directed Spending Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Projects(Amounts in Thousands)
Project Name
Amount Provided
Accelerating Heat Pump Adoption by Lower-Income Households, AK
420
Asia-Pacific Microgrid Development and Training, HI
1,000
Blue Earth County's Energy Efficiency Project, MN
4,330
Built to Last Pilot Project, PA
2,100
Chicago Clean Energy Retrofits Program, IL
500
Cogency Power Solar Project, CO
5,000Community of Hope Solar Parking Structure, NM
200
Cully Community Solar Pilot, OR
344
Derry Landfill Solar Project, NH
500
Development of an Electric Vehicle Associate's Degree Curriculum Standards and Educational
Materials for Automotive Educators and Technicians Nationwide, WV
1,000District Energy Construction, VT
5, 166Ductless Heat Pump Installation, OR
301
DWCPA Hydrokinetic Energy Harvester, MI
680
DWCPA Solar Energy Project, Ml
200
Electric Future for America's Rural Mobility Stakeholders (E-FARMS), OR
1,500
Electrical Substation for Garrison Oak Business and Technology Park, DE
5,000
Energy Efficient Community Cross-Laminated Timber Demonstration Project/Wood-fiber
Insulated Panels for Modular Construction and Retrofit Applications, ME
2,000
Energy Improvements for Rhode Island Schools, RI
5,000
Enhanced Biogas Collection and Energy Recovery Project, RI
2,900
Evanston Accessible Solar Program, IL
500
Expanding Solar Research and Generation for a Brighter Energy Future, VT
150
Fuel for Seniors : Energy Efficiency, CT
288
Grid Resilience and Equity in the Energy Transition, MA
995
Hanover LED Streetlight Conversion, NH
271
Heartland Green Energy and Manufacturing Valley Initiative, OH
500
Heat Recovery System, AK
659
Hybrid Solar Testing Platform for Cold Weather Climates, VT
4,000
Kauai North Shore Energy Resiliency Project, HI
1,000
Kivalina Biomass Reactor, AK
100
Klickitat Valley Health Central Utility Plant Modernization, WA
2,500
Makushin Geothermal Project, AK
2,500
Marquette Affordable Solar Clean Energy Planning Grant, MI
100
Microgrid Integration with Biomass Gasification as a Pathway to Hydrogen Production, NY
1,000
Municipal Building Upgrades, NY
303
New Jersey Green Hydrogen Demonstration Project, NJ
3,840
Newport Town Office Energy Improvements, NH
250
Northeast Kingdom Home Weatherization, VT
500
Off-Grid residential solar project on the Navajo Nation, NM
1,000
Overland Industrial park Solar Community Project, OH
1,500
Oyster River Resiliency Project, NH
1,150
Reducing Inequity in Access to Solar Power, DE
2,000
Rio Arriba County Energy Efficient Vehicle & Solar Charging Stations, NM
1,000
Salisbury Square Redevelopment: Achieving Home Affordability and Energy Resilience via a
Microgrid, VT
750
San Juan College Clean Hydrogen Workforce Development Program, NM
500
San Juan College Electric Vehicle Technician Certification Program, NM
50

Solar Testbed, WV
Sustainable Energy in Schools and Public Buildings, VT
Tacoma Public Utilities EV charging program, WA
Thermal Energy Storage to Support Renewable Energy Deployment, VT
Twin Lakes Reservoir Floating Solar Study, OH
Updated Renewable Energy Development Feasibility Study by the Pueblo of Zia, NM
Utility Upgrades for the Bedford Landfill Solar Project, NH
Vermont Electrification and Clean Energy Deployment, VT
WMU Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Secure, Efficient and Sustainable Energy
Technology, Ml

1,900
l,000
1,000
5,000
500
250
500
1,000
350

CYALRSECl lRITY , ENl:RtiY SECURITY, AND EMHHiE NCY RESPONSE

The agreement provides $185,804,000 for Cybersecurity , Energy Security, and Emergency
Response (CESER).
The Department is directed to include an itemization of funding levels below the control point in
future budget requests. Given concerns about the longstanding lack of clarity on the Department's cyberresearch and development responsibilities, CESER is directed to coordinate with the Office of Electricity
and relevant applied energy offices in clearly defining these program activities. The Department is directed
to provide the Committees quarterly updates on these topics.
The agreement provides not less than $2,000,000 for digital twin projects to enable essential
collaborator participation and their integration into the effort.
The agreement provides up to $20,000,000 for the Cyber Testing for Resilient Industrial Control
System (CyTRICS) program.

Risk Afanagemenf Technology and l'oo!s. -The agreement provides up to $ I 0,000,000 for
consequence-driven cyber-informed engineering and up to $4,000,000 for university-based research anddevelopment of scalable cyber-physical platforms for resilient and secure electric power systems that are
flexible, modular, self-healing, and autonomous. The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 to
conduct a demonstration program of innovative technologies, such as technologies for monitoring
vegetation management, to improve grid resiliency from wildfires. The agreement includes not less than
$2,000,000 to continue the establishment of a network of university-based, regional energy cybersecurity
centers .

( ·ongressionally Directed Spending.

The agreement provides $3 ,000,000 for the following list of

projects that provide for research , development, and demonstration for CESER activities or programs.
Recipients are reminded that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these projects.

49---------_..-\i!e

SERTTABLEllt]

50

Congressionally Directed Spending Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response Projects(Amounts in Thousands)
Project Name
Emerging Threat Information Sharing and Analysis Center, University of Arkansas Little Rock,AR
Oakland University Cybersecurity Center, Ml

Amount Provided

1,000
2,000

ELl'CTRICITY

The agreement provides $277,000,000 for Electricity. The Department is directed to include anitemization of funding levels below the control point in future budget requests. Given concerns about thelongstanding lack of clarity on the Department's cyber research and development responsibilities,
Electricity is directed to coordinate with the Office ofCybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency
Response ( CESER) and other relevant offices in clearly defining these program activities. The Department
is expected to integrate cybersecurity, where relevant, throughout all of Electricity's research, development,
demonstration, and deployment activities.

1,·ner?Jl Delivery Grid Operations Technology-The agreement provides $10,000,000 for the
DarkNet project and $5,000,000 to support research on silicon carbide semiconductors.

Resilient /)istribution Systems. -The agreement provides up to $ I 0,000,000 for the
COMMANDER National Test Bed.
The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction related to the integration of sensors into
distribution systems, microgrid controllers and systems, and transactive energy concepts.
The agreement provides not less than $ I 0,000,000 for demonstration projects with the Grid
Sensors and Sensor Analytics program. The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction on focus areas
for these demonstration projects, including activities that may include post-weather or fire event
assessments and activities utilizing utility data from advanced metering infrastructure.
The agreement reiterates Senate direction related to barriers impeding grid integration of
distributed energy systems.
The agreement provides up to $10,000,000 for coordinated research and development of
microgrid-related technologies, with a focus on underserved and Indigenous communities.

l~nergy Storage.-The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 for a competitive pilot
demonstration grant program, as authorized in section 320 I of the Energy Act of 2020, for energy storage
projects that are U.S-controlled, U.S.-made, and North American sourced and supplied. The Department isdirected to include in this program large scale commercial development and deployment oflong cycle life,
lithium-grid scale batteries and their components.
The agreement provides $5,000,000 for battery storage demonstration projects that are located inareas where grid capacity constraints result in curtailment of renewable generation; improve grid resilience
for a public utility that is regularly affected by weather-related natural disasters; and provide rate reduction
and renewable energy benefits to businesses, farms, and residents in economically-stressed rural areas.
Direct storage from solar generation may also be incorporated.

Cyber R& D.-The agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for university-based research anddevelopment of scalable cyber-physical platforms for resilient and secure electric power systems that are
flexible, modular, self-healing, and autonomous, in coordination with CESER.

51

Transformer Resilience and Advanced Components. -The agreement provides up to $5 ,000,000
for the Grid Research Integration and Demonstration Center and up to $2,500,000 to further assesscomposite utility poles in controlled and field tests. The Department is directed to support research anddevelopment to advance safe and effective alternatives to SF6, including in circuit breakers, reclosers,
sectionalizers, load break switches, switchgear, and gas insulated lines.

Transmission Permitting and lei·hnic:al Assistant·e. - The agreement reiterates Senate direction oncollaboration with relevant state entities to have access to grid, economic. and emissions modeling.

( 'ongressionally /)irected .','pending

The agreement provides $2,850.000 for the following list of

projects that provide for research, development, and demonstration for Electricity activities or programs.
Recipients are reminded that statutory cost sharing requirements may apply to these projects.

52--! INSERT TABLEl1r---------....J<2.C...-53

Congressionally Directed Spending Electricity Projects(Amounts in Thousands)
Project Name
Cuyahoga County Utility Microgrid Design Project, OH
Electrical transmission and distribution infrastructure for PUD No I of Lewis County, WA
Village of Old Brookville Village Hall ex ansion : 52 kW standb · backu generator, NY

Amount Provided
300
2,500
50

NUCLEAR ENER<,YThe agreement provides $1,654,800,000 for Nuclear Energy.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees a briefing and regular updates prior toany proposed contractual and engineering design changes for advanced reactor projects currently being
funded. Further, the Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 90 days afterenactment of this Act a detailed multi-year funding plan for the advanced reactor designs currently being
pursued by the Department.
The agreement reiterates House direction related to a report on thorium molten-salt reactors .

.Vuclear F.nergy University Program (.Vn.'P).-Since 2009, the Department has allocated up to 20
percent of funds appropriated to Nuclear Energy research and development programs to fund university-led
R&D and university infrastructure projects through an open, competitive solicitation process using formallycertified peer reviewers. The agreement provides a separate control point to fund NEUP and othercrosscutting program responsibilities (SBIR, STTR, and TCF) in order to provide greater transparency andflexibility for this program. The Department is directed to provide to the Committees prior to the obligationof these funds a detailed spending and execution plan for NEUP activities. The Department is directed toprovide to the Committees not later 90 days after enactment of this Act and quarterly thereafter briefings on
the implementation ofNEUP. The Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 180
days after enactment of this Act, and prior to taking any actions, a briefing on proposals to addressconcerns and implement improvements recommended by the Nuclear Engineering Department Heads
Organization. The agreement does not provide any funds to initiate the construction of new university
nuclear reactors.
NUCLEAR ENER<iY FNABLIN(i Tl'CIINOLOCilES

The agreement provides $3,000,000 to complete the preliminary engineering and design,
contingent on Departmental approval, of a secure, separate, and shielded beam line at the NSLS II at
Brookhaven National Laboratory to examine radioactive materials. This beam line shall complement andbe compatible with irradiation tests and infrastructure for materials characterization and sample preparation
at Idaho National Laboratory.

Crosscutting Technology /)evelopment.-The agreement provides $5,000,000 to support andexpand research collaborations, which may include a consortium, between research universities andnational laboratories utilizing existing capabilities and infrastructure focused on the benefits, as well as
vulnerabilities, of digital instrumentation for existing and future nuclear reactors, including the use of new
approaches, such as predictive analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, to improve reactor
safety and performance and address cybersecurity issues. The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000
to continue activities related to materials development, including through public-private partnerships,54

to develop new materials the nuclear industry will need in the future. The agreement provides $10,000,000
for integrated energy systems and $3,000,000 for Nuclear Materials Discovery and Qualification. The
agreement includes no direction on the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) program.

Nuclear .",'cienee User Facilities.-The agreement provides not less than $10,000,000 forcomputational support.

New Afaterials Development.-The agreement provides funding for this activity in Crosscutting
Technology Development.
Fl/LL CYCI.I: RLSEARCII AND DFVLLOPMl'NT

To support availability of high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) and other advanced nuclear
fuels, consistent with section 200 I of the Energy Act of 2020, the agreement includes $72,000,000,
including $2,000,000 for Mining, Shipping, and Transportation; $45,000,000 for Advanced Nuclear Fuel
Availability; and not less than $25,000,000 within Material Recovery and Waste Form Development.

,ldvanced Nuclear Fuel Availahility. - The Department is directed to conduct these activities in amanner that will encourage, rather than discourage, the private sector commercialization of HALEU
production. The fiscal year 2020 Act directed the Department to provide an evaluation on the anticipateddemand for HALEU, the timing of that demand, and options for meeting that demand. Section 200 I (b )(2)of the Energy Act of 2020 requires the Department to submit to Congress a report on a program to support
the availability of HALEU for civilian domestic demonstration and commercial use. The Department isdirected to submit these reports to the Committees not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act and notless than 60 days prior to the obligation of more than 90 percent of these funds.

Afaterial Recovery and Waste Form Development.-The agreement provides not less than
$15,000,000 for EBR-11 Processing for HALEU and$ I 0,000,000 to continue work on the ZIRCEX
process.

Accident Tolerant Fuels.-The agreement provides not less than $ I 0,000,000 for further
development of silicon carbide ceramic matrix composite fuel cladding for light water reactors. The
agreement reiterates House and Senate direction regarding information and briefing requirements for the
Accident Tolerant Fuels program.

friso Fuel and CJraphite Qualijieation.-The agreement provides up to $ I 0,000,000 to continue
the transition ofTRISO fuel to a multiple-producer market, ensuring that more than one industry source
would be available to the commercial and government markets.

Used Nuclear Fuel /)isposition R&n.-The agreement provides $5,000,000 for advanced reactor
used fuel disposition to address used fuel from TRISO-fueled and metal-fueled advanced reactors.

55

ln1egru1ed WusLe AlunugemenL ,\yslem.- The Department is directed to continue site preparation
activities at stranded sites. to evaluate the re-initiation of regional transport, and to undertake transportation
coordination efforts.

REACTOR CONCEPTS RESEARCII ANO DEVELOPMl:NT

Advunced Small ;\,fodulur Rew:Lor RD& n .- The agreement provides $150,000,000 for ongoing
demonstration activities.
Ugh! WuLer ReucLor SusLuinuhiliLy.-The agreement provides not less than $10,000.000 to
support new or previously awarded hydrogen demonstration projects.
, ldvunced Reac:Lor Technologies.- The agreement provides not less than $13,000,000 for
Advanced Reactor Concepts Industry Awards; up to $5,000,000 for continued work on Supercritical
Transformational Electric Power (STEP) research and development; and not less than $25,000,000 for
MW-scale reactor research and development, including not less than $9,000.000 for MARVEL. The
agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for the research and development of advanced isotope separation
processes for Molten Salt Reactors.
ADVANCLD Rl :ACTOR DLMONSTRATION PRO(iRAM

The Department is directed to continue to ensure the program moves forward expeditiously andwithin original scope and budget. The Department is directed to continue to focus resources on partners
capable of project delivery within five to seven years of award.
NuLionul ReacLor !nnovuLion Cenler. -The agreement provides up to $48,000,000 for capitaldesign and construction activities for demonstration reactor test bed preparation at Idaho National
Laboratory supporting reactor demonstration activities. The Department shall submit a Construction Project
Data Sheet for each such applicable project that is expected to exceed the minor construction threshold .

FOSSIi . EN ER(iY AND ( ARBON MANMil:MLNT

The agreement provides $825,000,000 for Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.
Consistent with section 961 (a)(3) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. in carrying out the objectives
described in subparagraphs (F) through (K) of paragraph (2) of section 961 (a), the Secretary shall prioritize
activities and strategies that have the potential to significantly reduce emissions for each technology
relevant to the applicable objective and the international commitments of the United States.

56

The agreement provides no funds to plan, develop, implement, or pursue the consolidation or
closure of any of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) sites.
The agreement provides not less than $5,000,000 for integrated energy systems and $500,000 to
support feasibility and operational planning for large-scale biomass production for the purposes ofbioenergy with carbon capture and storage.
The agreement provides $10,000,000 for a laboratory demonstration project for carbon-neutral
methanol synthesis from direct air capture and carbon-free hydrogen production .

.'·.;olid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems & I lydrogen.-The agreement provides not less than $ I05,000,000
for the research, development, and demonstration of solid oxide fuel cell systems and hydrogen production,transport, storage, and use systems.

National ( 'urhon C·upture Center.- The agreement supports funding for the National Carbon
Capture Center consistent with the cooperative agreement.
CClJS AND POWFR SYSTl:MS

The Department is directed to conduct CCUS activities, including front-end engineering anddesign studies, large pilot projects, and demonstration projects that capture and securely store commercial
volumes of carbon dioxide from fossil energy power plants, industrial facilities, or directly from the air,consistent with the objectives of title IV of the Energy Act of 2020.
The Department is directed to establish a program to support research and development of novel,
proof-of-principle carbon containment projects with the goal of finding and de-risking methods andlocations to remove atmospheric carbon dioxide that are effective, safe, low cost, and scalable. The
agreement provides up to $50,000,000 to support work at multiple sites, including within significant basalt
formations, to pursue research, development. and deployment of carbon containment technologies andproximate carbon dioxide capturing systems that also meet regional economic and ecological restoration
policy goals such as catastrophic wildfire mitigation and job creation.

( 'urhon Cupture. -The agreement provides up to $50,000.000 to support front-end engineeringand design studies, large pilot projects, and demonstration projects, including for the development of afirst-of-its-kind carbon capture project at an existing natural gas combined cycle plant. The agreement
provides not less than $10,000,000 for research and optimization of carbon capture technologies atindustrial facilities and not less than $12,000,000 for research and optimization of carbon capture
technologies for natural gas power systems. The agreement provides up to $ 10,000,000 to assist
communities in the design and construction of pilot-scale equipment and systems necessary to demo nstratecarbon capture, utilization, and storage at waste to energy plants.

57

Carhon Dioxide Removal.-The agreement provides $5,000,000 for a competitive solicitation fora study of the development of a direct air capture facility co-located with a geothermal energy resource.
The agreement provides $5,000,000 for research, development, and demonstration activities related to theindirect sequestration of carbon dioxide from ocean waters.

Carhon Utilization-The agreement provides not less than $8,000,000 for a competitive
solicitation to conduct tests of technologies for carbon dioxide absorption integrated with algae systems for
capturing and reusing or utilizing carbon dioxide to produce useful fuels and chemicals, giving priority forteams with university participants.
C'arhon Storage. - The agreement provides not less than $35,000,000 for CarbonSAFE and notless than $20,000,000 for the Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships. The agreement includes nodirection for Storage Infrastructure. The only direction for carbon containment technologies and proximate
carbon dioxide capturing systems is located in the front matter of CCUS and Power Systems.

,Jdvanced l~nergy and llydrogen ,\vstems -The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 for
Advanced Turbines to carry out research, development, and technology demonstration to improve theefficiency of gas turbines used in power generation systems, aviation, and other applications. The
agreement provides up to $50,000,000 for materials research and development. The Department is directed
to support the development of ceramic matrix composite (CMC) materials in accordance with the CMC
Manufacturing Roadmap and section 4005 of the Energy Act of 2020.
C'rosscutting Research-The agreement provides $1,000,000 for research, development, andcommercialization of value-added natural gas technologies consistent with Senate direction.

Minerals Sustainahility.-The agreement provides not less than $23,000,000 for research anddevelopment activities to develop advanced separation technologies for the extraction and recovery of rareearth elements and other critical materials from coal and coal byproducts, as well as mitigate any potential
environmental and public health impacts of such activities. The Department is directed to continue theCarbon Ore, Rare Earths, and Critical Minerals (CORE-CM) Program. The agreement provides up to$6,000,000 for the Department, in collaboration with the Department of Commerce and U.S. Geological
Survey, to pilot a research and development project to enhance the security and stability of the rare earth
element supply chain. Research shall include approaches to mining of domestic rare earth elements that are
critical to U.S. technology development and manufacturing, as well as emphasize environmentally
responsible mining practices.

58

Supercritic:ul Trun.iformutionul r.'leL'lric Power (STFP) Uenerution. - The agreement supports
efforts, consistent with the current cooperative agreement, to complete the necessary design andconstruction of the l 0-MW pilot and to conduct the necessary testing for the facility. The Department isdirected to brief the Committees prior to any change to scope or cost profile of the project. The agreement
provides additional funds for competitively awarded research and development activities.
RLSOl lRCI: Tl:CIINOLO(ill'S AND Sl/STAINABII .ITY

The agreement provides not less than $20.000,000 for Emissions Mitigation from Midstream
Infrastructure, including $5,000,000 to develop and demonstrate an easily implementable, maintainable,
and low-cost intehrrated methane monitoring platform consistent with Senate direction.
The agreement provides not less than $10,000,000 for Emissions Quantification from Natural Gas
Infrastructure, including $1,500,000 to accelerate development and deployment of high-temperature harshenvironment sensors, sensor packaging, and wireless sensor hardware for power generation.
The agreement provides not less than $12,000,000 for Environmentally Prudent Development.
including up to $6,000,000 to continue the Risk Based Data Management System.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000,000 for natural gas utilization, hydrogen,sustainable fuels, and chemicals. The agreement provides up to $5,000,000 for a demonstration projectfocused on producing hydrogen from the processing of produced water and mineral substances and on
transporting hydrogen using existing energy infrastructure.
The agreement provides $10,000,000 for further research on multipronged approaches forcharacterizing the constituents of and managing the cleaning of water produced during the extraction of oil
and natural gas, of which $8,000,000 is available to partner with research universities engaged in the studyof characterizing, cleaning, treating, and managing produced water and who are willing to engage thoughpublic private partnerships with the energy industry to develop and assess commercially viable technology
to achieve the same.
The agreement provides $ l 0,000.000 for university research and field investigations in the Gulf of
Mexico to confirm the nature, regional context, and hydrocarbon system behavior of gas hydrate deposits.
The agreement provides not less than $19,000,000 for Unconventional Field Test Sites. The
Department is directed to maintain robust efforts in enhanced recovery technologies.
Nf'TL INFRASTRl/CTl/RI 'Within available funds for NETL Infrastructure, the Department is directed to prioritize funds for
Joule, the Center for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Leaming. site-wide upgrades for safety, andaddressing and avoiding deferred maintenance. The agreement provides up to $25,000.000 to establish a
direct air capture facility.

59( ·ongressiona/ly Directed Spending

The agreement provides $20,199,000 for the following listof projects that provide for research, development, and demonstration for Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management activities or programs. Recipients are reminded that statutory cost sharing requirements may
apply to these projects.

60

lNSERT T ABLq

r --

61

e

Congressionally Directed Spending Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Projects(Amounts in Thousands )Project Name
Amount Provided
4,000
Coal Communities Regional Innovation Cluster, WY
Coal Mine Methane Solutions, CO
1,200
Emergency Backup Generator, AK
540
2,500
Enhanced Outcrop Methane Capture, CO
9,000
FEED Study for the implementation of a Carbon Capture and Sequestration System, LA
2,959
Mercer Count · Gas Line Extension. WY

NAVAL PETROLElJM AND OIL SllALE RESERVl'S

The agreement provides $13,650,000 for the operation of the Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale
Reserves.
STRATHiIC PETROIHIM RLSl:RVF

The agreement includes $219,000,000 for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, of which $22,000,000
is for the Northeast Gasoline Supply Reserve.
No funding is requested for the establishment of a new regional petroleum product reserve, and nofunding is provided for this purpose. Further, the Department may not establish any new regional petroleum
product reserves unless funding for such a proposed regional petroleum product reserve is explicitly
requested in advance in an annual budget request and approved by Congress in an appropriations Act.

SPR PFTR<>IHIM ACCOUNT

The agreement provides $7,350,000 for the SPR Petroleum Account.

NORTIILAST HOME HLATINCi OIL RLSL'RVI:

The agreement provides $6,500,000 for the Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.

ENER(iY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $129,087,000 for the Energy Information Administration.

NoN-DFFFNSF ENVIRONMENTAL CLLANllP

The agreement provides $333,863,000 for Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup.

Smull Sites.-The agreement provides $119,340,000 for Small Sites cleanup. Within this amount,$21,340,000 is for the Energy Technology Engineering Center, $11,000,000 is for Idaho National
Laboratory, $5,000,000 is to continue work at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, $67,000,000 is for
Moab, and $15,000,000 is for excess Office of Science facilities.

Gaseous D(ffusion Plunts.-The agreement provides $121,203,000 for cleanup activities at the
Gaseous Diffusion Plants, including an additional $5,000,000 above the budget request for treatment andshipping of cylinders.

62

URJ\NlllM ENRll'llMLNT DECONTAMINATION ANO DU.'OMMISSIONIN<i FllND

The agreement provides $860.000,000 for activities funded from the Uranium Enrichment
Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund.

Portsmouth Site.-Within funds available for Pensions and Community and Regulatory Support,
the agreement provides an additional $500,000 above the budget request for the Department to establish acommunity liaison and to provide technical and regulatory assistance to the local community andsurrounding counties. The agreement reiterates House direction on air and ground water monitoring andreporting, land use planning, and Committee briefings following additional environmental sampling.

SCILNl'L

The agreement provides $7,475,000,000 for Science.
The agreement provides not less than $120,000,000 for Artificial Intelligence and Machine
Leaming capabilities across the Office of Science programs.
The agreement provides not less than $2,000.000 for collaboration with the National Institutes of
Health within the Department's data and computational mission space .
The agreement provides not less than $245.000,000 for quantum information science, including
not less than $120,000,000 for research and $125,000,000 for the five National Quantum Information
Science Research Centers.
The agreement reiterates House direction on traineeships.
The Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 90 days after enactment of
this Act and annually thereafter briefings on implementation of the new workforce initiative.
The Department is directed to award up to IO Lawrence Awards with an honorarium of not lessthan $20,000 per awardee.
J\DVi\Nl"FD SCll'NTIFIC l'OMPl/TIN<i Rl:SL:i\Rl'I I

The agreement provides not less than $160,000,000 for the Argonne Leadership Computing
Facility , $250,000,000 for the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, not less than $120,000,000 for
the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, andnot less than $90,000,000 for ESnet.
The agreement provides not less than $260,000.000 for Mathematical, Computational, andComputer Sciences Research, including not less than $15,000,000 for computational sciences workforce
programs.
The agreement provides not less than $15,000,000 and up to $40,000,000 for the development of
Al-optimized emerging memory technology for Al-specialized hardware allowing for new computing
capabilities tailored to the demands of artificial intelligence systems.

6313/\SJC LNER< iY SCIENCES

The agreement provides not less than $130,000,000 for the Energy Frontier Research Centers,$25,000,000 for EPSCoR, $25,000,000 for the Batteries and Energy Storage Innovation Hub, and not lessthan $20,000,000 for the Fuels from Sunlight Innovation Hub.
The agreement provides not less than $538,000,000 for facilities operations of the nation ' s lightsources. not less than $294 ,000,000 for facilities operations of the high-flux neutron sources. and not lessthan $142.000,000 for facilities operations and recapitalization of the Nanoscale Science Research Centers(N SRC).
The agreement provides not less than $14,300,000 for other project costs, including $4,300,000
for Linac Coherent Light Source-II. $5,000,000 for Advanced Photon Source Upgrade. $3,000,000 for
Linac Coherent Light Source-II HE. and $2,000,000 for Cryomodule Repair & Maintenance Facility. The
agreement provides $15,000,000 for NSRC Recapitalization and not less than $15.000,000 for NSLS II
Experimental Tools-II . The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction regarding the importance ofadditional beam) ines at NSLS II and the development of a related plan .
BJOU >< ilC i\J. i\ND l'NVIRONMENTi\J. Rl 'Sl:i\RCIIThe agreement provides not less than $395,000,000 for Biological Systems Science and not lessthan $410,000.000 for Earth and Environmental Systems Sciences.
Within available funds, the agreement provides up to $8.000,000 to develop and test novel sensor
technologies, procure second generation EcoPOD units, and create the computational and experimental
infrastructures necessary to dissect field observations at atomic and molecular levels in fabricatedecosystems.
The agreement provides not less than $100,000,000 for the Bioenergy Research Centers.
The agreement provides not less than $ I 09.000,000 for Foundational Genomics Research and notless than $82,500,000 for the Joint Genome Institute.
The agreement provides not less than $45,000,000 for Biomolecular Characterization and Imaging
Science. including up to $15 ,000,000 to continue the development of a multi-scale genes-to ecosystems
approach that supports a predictive understanding of gene functions and how they scale with complex
biological and environmental systems .
The agreement provides not less than $8,000,000 for the low-dose radiation research program andreiterates House direction related to developing a plan for low-dose radiation research.

64

The agreement provides not less than $15,000.000 and up to $30.000.000 to build upon cloudaerosol effects research. Within those available funds, the Department is directed to support themodernization and acceleration of the Energy, Exascale, and Earth System Model program to improve
earth system prediction and climate risk management in the service of U.S. public safety, security, andeconomic interests, including, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security. evaluation of themodernization and adaptation of capabilities from the National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis
Center to support climate impacts on infrastructure and communities.
The agreement provides $2.000,000 in funding for academia to examine and perform independent
evaluations of climate models using existing data sets and peer-reviewed publications of climate-scale
processes to validate various models' ability to reproduce the actual climate.
The agreement provides not less than $ 105,000,000 for Environmental System Science. The
Department is directed to continue to support NGEE Arctic, NGEE Tropics, the SPRUCE field site, theWatershed Function and Mercury Science Focus Areas, and the AmeriFLUX project.
The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 to continue the development of observational
assets and support associated research on the nation 's major land-water interfaces, including the Great
Lakes and the Puget Sound, that leverages national laboratories' assets as well as local infrastructure andexpertise at universities and other research institutions. The agreement reiterates House direction on
developing a ten-year research plan.
The Department is directed to give priority to optimizing the operation of BER user facilities.
FlJSION L:NLR<iY SCll:NCl :S

The Departm ent is directed to follow and embrace the recommendations of the Fusion Energy
Sciences Advisory Committee's .. Powering the Future: Fusion and Plasmas" report; the agreement
reiterates House direction on the related briefing.
The agreement provides not less than $20,000.000 for the High-Energy-Density Laboratory
Plasmas program to advance cutting-edge research in extreme states of matter: expand the capabilities of
the LaserNetUS facilities; and provide initial investments in new intense, ultrafast laser technologies
needed to retain U.S. leadership in these fields.
The agreement provides not less than $59,000,000 for NSTX- U Operations, not less than
$3 3,000,000 for NSTX- U Research, and not less than $25,000,000 for the Material Plasma Exposure
eXperiment.
The agreement reiterates House direction on the Milestone-Based Development Program and thestellarator facility.
The agreement provides $242,000,000 for the U.S. contribution to the ITER project, of which notless than $60,000,000 is for in-cash contributions. The agreement reiterates House direction o n an updated
baseline for Subproject I and a baseline for Subproject 2.

65

fll( j l I ENER(iY PHYSICS

The agreement provides not less than $30,000,000 for the Sanford Underground Research Facility,
up to $20,000,000 for Cosmic Microwave Background-Stage 4, and not less than $40,000,000 for the HLLHC Upgrade projects.
The agreement supports activities for the LuSEE-Night project.
The agreement provides up to $13,000,000 for other project costs for the Long Baseline Neutrino
Facility / Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment. Further, if the Department deems it necessary toprovide further funding for this project, it is encouraged to seek a reprogramming, but these funds shallcome from other research activities and projects currently funded at Fermi National Laboratory.
NUCLEAR PHYSICSThe Department is directed to give priority to optimizing operations for all Nuclear Physics user
facilities.
The agreement provides for the completion of sPHENIX , up to $15,800,000 for the Gamma-Ray
Energy Tracking Array, up to $16,200,000 for MOLLER, up to $1 ,400 ,000 for Ton-Scale Neutrinoless
Double Beta Decay, and up to $13,000,000 for the High Rigidity Spectrometer.
ISOTOPES R&D AND PRODl ICTION

The agreement supports the FRIB Isotope Harvesting projects.
WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACIIFRS AND SCIENTISTS

The agreement reiterates House and Senate direction on a five-year educational and workforce
development plan. The agreement reiterates Senate direction on the curriculum working group.
SCILNCE 1.AB<>RAT<lRll:S lNFRASTRl/CTl/Rl'

The Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later 90 days after enactment of thisAct a briefing on the funding levels required for operations and maintenance of the Oak Ridge National
Laboratory nuclear facilities. This is the only direction related to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
nuclear facilities.

66

NllCI.EAR WAST!' DISPOSAi.

The agreement provides $27,500,000 for Nuclear Waste Disposal, of which $20,000,000 is forinterim storage and $7,500,000 is for Nuclear Waste Fund oversight activities.

Tl'CIINOI.O(iY TRANSITIONS

The agreement provides$ I 9,470,000 for Technology Transitions. The agreement provides not lessthan $5,000.000 for a competitive funding opportunity for incubators supporting energy innovation
clusters.

CLEA ENER<iY DEMONSTRATIONS

The agreement provides $20,000,000 for Clean Energy Demonstrations.
Pursuant to the budget request, the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED) is intended to
be a technology neutral office with expertise in large-scale energy project management and finance. It is
expected that the Department avoid the practice of making awards dependent on funding from future years'
appropriations. The Department is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 30 days afterenactment of this Act a briefing on how OCED will conduct administrative and project management
responsibilities.

ADY i\NCED RLSl'ARCII PROJl-:CTS A<iENCY- ENl:R<iY

The agreement provides $450,000,000 for the Advanced Research Projects Agency- Energy(ARPA- E). The Department is directed to consider activities proposed under ARPA- C that are consistent
with ARPA- E's mission and authorization in addition to its other current and proposed activities.

TITl.f' 17 INNOY ATIYE TECI INOLO(iY LOAN GllARANTH: PRO<iRAM

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $29,000,000 in administrative expenses for the Title 17
Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program.

ADY /\NCH) TECHNOI.O<iY VEIIICI.ES MANllFACTIJRIN(i LOAN PRO<iRAM

The agreement provides $5,000,000 for the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan
Program .

67

TR!Bi\L ENERGY Loi\N GtJARANTIT PROGRAM

The agreement provides $2,000,000 for the Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program.

INDIAN ENER(iY POLICY AND PRO<iR,\MS

The agreement provides $58,000,000 for Indian Energy Policy and Programs. The agreement
provides not less than $20,000,000 to advance technical assistance, demonstration. and deployment of clean
energy technologies, including solar and energy storage, for households and communities in tribal nations
to improve reliability, resilience, and alleviate energy poverty.

Dl'l'i\RTMENTi\l . ADMI NISTRATI<JN

The agreement provides $2-l0,000 ,000 for Departmental Administration.
The agreement reiterates House direction on the report related to critical minerals assets.

( ·ontrol l'oints.- The agreement includes eight reprogramming control points in this account toprovide flexibility in the management of support functions. The Other Departmental Administration
activities include Management, Project Management Oversight and Assessments. Chief Human Capital
Officer, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, General Counsel. Office of Policy, andPublic Affairs. The Department is directed to continue to submit a budget request that proposes a separate
funding level for each of these activities.

( 'hief'l1?frJrmation 0/ficer.- The agreement provides not less than $71,800.000 for cybersecurity
and secure information. In addition, the agreement provides not less than $55.000,000 to address theimpacts of the SolarWinds incident across the Department.

International .·1/Juirs.- The agreement provides $2.000.000 for the Israel Bi national Industrial
Research and Development (BIRD) Foundation and $4,000,000 to continue the U.S. Israel Center of
Excellence in Energy Engineering and Water Technology.

Other Uepartmental Administration.- The agreement provides not less than $28,000,000 for the
Chief Human Capital Officer. up to $38.000,000 for the General Counsel, not less than $13,000,000 for
Project Management Oversight and Assessments, not less than $3,500,000 for the Office of Small andDisadvantaged Business Utilization, and not less than $4,000,000 for Public Affairs.

l J.:,:. l~nergy and limployment Report. - The agreement provides up to $2,000.000 for the
Department to continue to complete an annual U.S. energy employment report that includes acomprehensive statistical survey to collect data, publish the data. and provide a summary report, withrequirements as outlined in the House report. The Department is directed to produce and release this reportannually.

68

The agreement reiterates Senate direction related to the CIO Business Operations Support Services(CBOSS) program.

OFFICE OF TIii' INSPECTOR Gl'NLRJ\L

The agreement provides $78,000.000 for the Office of the Inspector General. The following is the
only direction for the Office of the Inspector General.
There continues to be concerns about how the new independent audit strategy will be
implemented. As such, the Inspector General is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 15 days
after enactment of this Act, and monthly thereafter, a briefing on the implementation of the independent
audit strategy.

69

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIESNATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides $20,656,000,000 for the National Nuclear Security Administration(NNSA).
W1 :APONS ACTIVITll :S

The agreement provides $15,920,000,000 for Weapons Activities.

Integrated Priorities Report.

The fiscal year 2021 Act directed NNSA to provide with its budget

request an Integrated Priorities Report (IPR). The report NNSA submitted does not meet the direction set
by the fiscal year 2021 Act and was identified by NNSA as not a final integrated priority report. The
agreement reiterates House direction regarding NNSA 's submission of an IPR with the annual budget
request.

Stockpile Aianagement.- ln lieu of House and Senate direction, the agreement includes funding
consistent with the budget request as Congress awaits the upcoming Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) .
NNSA is directed to brief the Congressional Defense Committees on any departures from the fiscal year
2022 budget request in the NPR.

Plutonium Pit Production Jfodernization.

GAO is engaged in an ongoing review ofNNSA 's

integrated master schedule ([MS) that includes all pit production-related project and program activities.
NNSA is directed to provide to the Committees not later than 30 days after enactment of this Act, and notless than quarterly thereafter, a briefing on progress on meeting the pit production cost and schedule
milestones in the IMS .
Additionally, concerns remain about contingency planning for pit production given the timeline
for achieving 80 pits per year will stretch beyond 2030. The contingency plan NNSA provided theCommittees includes only minimal detail on meeting the needs of the nuclear deterrent that do not solely
rely on the statutory milestones for pit production. NNSA is directed to provide to the Committees not later
than 60 days after enactment of this Act an update detailing actionable plans based on current pit
production timelines and coordinated with the Department of Defense. NNSA is further reminded that thecontingency plan shall be updated and submitted annually with the budget request.

l iniversity ( 'ollaboration. The agreement reiterates House direction regarding a Center of
Excellence.

70

Academic Progrums.

Within amounts for Academic Programs. the agreement provides$40.000,000 for the Minority Serving Institution Partnership Program and $ I 0,000.000 for the Tribal
Colleges and Universities Partnership Program. The agreement reiterates Senate direction regarding the
distribution of funds.

lnertiul Confinement Fusion (/CJ.) and 1/igh Yield
provides not less than $350,000,000 for theWithin available funds, the agreement

ational Ignition Facility ( IF), not less than $83.000,000 for

OMEGA, not less than $66,900.000 for the Z Facility. and not less than $6.000,000 for the NIKE Laser at
the Naval Research Laboratory. A predictable and sustained availability of targets is essential to theoperations of NNSA 's laser facilities. and the agreement provides not less than $33.000,000 for target
research, development. and fabrication to cost-effectively operate the NI F, Z, and OMEGA facilities.

/ldvanced Simulution und ( ·omputing

Within funds provided for Advanced Simulation andComputing (ASC), the agreement provides $25,000,000 for research in, and leading to the development of,memory technologies that will drive 40X performance gains beyond that achieved by exascale computing
systems for critical mission applications. Within funds provided for ASC. the agreement provides$15.000.000 for scalable computational NYMe over fabrics for exascale computing applications at Los
Alamos National Laboratory.

Stockpile Re.\ponsiveness Prvgrum.

The agreement reiterates House direction regarding anannual report and periodic updates.

( ·on1rucwr Pensions. The agreement provides $78.656.000 for payments into the legacy
University of California contractor employee defined benefit pension plans. the Requa settlement reachedin 20 I 9, and the pension plan at the Savannah River Site.

DLl+NSI' Nl ICI ,1:/\R N< >NPROLIFl ' RATION

The agreement provides $2.354,000.000 for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.

Glohul Muteriul Security.

The agreement provides not less than $38,000,000 for the Green

Border Security Initiative within the Nuclear Smuggling Detection and Deterrence program. Within
available funds. not less than $25.000,000 is for the Cesium Irradiator Replacement Program.

/JNN R&. IJ. The agreement provides $20.000.000 for the University Consortia for
Nonproliferation Research.

Contrucwr Pensions. The agreement provides $38 ,800.000 for payments into the legacy
University of California contractor employee defined benefit pension plans. the Requa settlement reachedin 2019, and the pension plan at the Savannah River Site.

71

NA VAi. REACTORS(INCU JDIN(i TRANSFER OF HJNDS)

The agreement provides $1,918,000,000 for Naval Reactors.

,'-,pent Fuel lfandlinK Fai:ility.

The agreement provides funds above the budget request to address

project cost increases and to mitigate the risk of schedule delays.

hDLRAI. SAi.ARiES AND EXPENSFS

The agreement provides $464,000,000 for Federal Salaries and Expenses.
The agreement recognizes the importance of recruiting and retaining the highly skilled personnel
needed to meet NNSA 's important mission. NNSA is directed to only hire within authorized personnel
numbers provided for a given fiscal year, and ifNNSA exceeds this authorized amount, then the
Administrator must submit to the Committees within 30 days of the exceedance a report justifying theexcess . The NNSA is directed to continue providing monthly updates on the status of hiring and retention .

ENVIRONMENTAL AND OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIESDFFL:NSI' ENVIRONMENTAL CI.FANllP

The agreement provides $6,710,000,000 for Defense Environmental Cleanup.

Richland.-The Department is directed to carry out maintenance and public safety efforts at
historical sites, including the B Reactor. This includes facility improvements needed to expand publicaccess and interpretive programs. Specifically, within available funds, the agreement provides $ I 0,000,000
for B Reactor roof replacement and other work to preserve the facility . The Department is directed torequest any additional funding needed to complete the identified other work to preserve the facility startingwith the fiscal year 2023 budget.
None of the Richland Operations funds shall be used to carry out activities with the Office ofRiver Protection's tank farms.

Office o/River Protec:tion.-The agreement reiterates House direction regarding low level waste
offsite disposal.
The agreement provides funds for full engineering, procurement, and construction work on theHigh-Level Waste Treatment Facility, for design and engineering of the Pre-Treatment Facility, to ensurecompliance with the 2016 Consent Decree and Tri-Party Agreement milestones, and to continue tank waste
retrievals.

Savannah River Site .-The agreement reiterates House direction regarding funding SavannahRiver National Laboratory radiological facilities.

72

DFFFNSF LJRANil/M ENR!Cl!Ml:NT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONIN(i([NCU l[)[N(i TRANSFl:R OF Fl fNDS)

The agreement provides $573,333,000 for Defense Uranium Enrichment Decontamination andDecommissioning.

0Tl!ER D!:FL:NSI: ACTIVITIESThe agreement provides $985,000,000 for Other Defense Activities. The agreement includes$12,000,000 above the budget request for targeted investments to defend the U.S. energy sector against theevolving threat of cyber and other attacks in support of the resiliency of the nation's electric grid andenergy infrastructure.

POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS

80NNFVILLF POWER ADMINISTRATION Fl/ND

The agreement provides no appropriation for the Bonneville Power Administration, which derives
its funding from revenues deposited into the Bonneville Power Administration Fund.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOUTIIEASTFRN POWER ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $0 for the Southeastern Power Administration.

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, SOl lTllWFSTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION

The agreement provides a net appropriation of$ I 0,400,000 for the Southwestern Power
Administration. To ensure sufficient authority to meet purchase power and wheeling needs, the agreement
includes $21,000,000 above the level credited as offsetting collections by the Congressional Budget Office.
CONSTRUCTION, RHIABILITATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, WESTERN AREA POWl:R
ADMINISTRATI< lN

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $90,772,000 for the Western Area Power
Administration.

73

FALCON AND AMISTJ\D 01'1:RAT!NG AND MAINTENANCE FUND

The agreement provides a net appropriation of $228,000 for the Falcon and Amistad Operatingand Maintenance Fund.

FEDl:RAL ENERliY RHil ll.Al()RY COMMISSIONSJ\I.J\RIES /\ND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $466,426,000 for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Revenues for FERC are set to an amount equal to the budget authority, resulting in a net appropriation of$0.

74

GENERAL PROVISIONS- DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(INCI.UDIN<i TRANSFERS AND RECISSIONS OF FlJNDS)

The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds provided in this title to initiate
requests for proposals, other solicitations, or arrangements for new programs or activities that have not yet
been approved and funded by Congress: requires notification or a report for certain funding actions;prohibits funds to be used for certain multi-year "Energy Programs" activities without notification; andprohibits the obligation or expenditure of funds provided in this title through a reprogramming of funds
except in certain circumstances. The notification requirements in the provision also apply to themodification of any grant, contract. or Other Transaction Agreement where funds are allocated for new
programs, projects, or activities not covered by a previous notification.
The agreement includes a provision authorizing intelligence activities of the Department of Energy
for purposes of section 504 of the National Security Act of 194 7.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this title for capitalconstruction of high hazard nuclear facilities, unless certain independent oversight is conducted.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds in this title to approve criticaldecision-2 or critical decision-3 for certain construction projects. unless a separate independent costestimate has been developed for that critical decision.
The agreement includes a provision regarding authority to re lease refined petroleum product fromthe Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
The agreement includes a provision to prohibit certain payments.
The agreement includes a provision that rescinds certain funds from prior year appropriations.
The agreement includes a provision transferring certain funds.

75

_._IINSERT TABLEI

A76

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thou sa nds)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bil lRequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

400,000
255,000
150,000

595,000
340,000
197,500

420 , 000
262 , 000
157,500•20, 000• 7 , 000
• 7,500-175 , 000-78 , 000
-40.000

805,000

1 , 132 ,500

839 , 500

•34 , 500

-293 . 000

280,000
110,000
150, 000
106,000

3B6,575
204 , 870
196,560
163,760

290. 000
114 , 000
162 , 000
109 , 500
40 , 000• 10 . 000+4 , 000•12 , 000
•3 , 500•40, 000- 96 , 575-90 , 870
-34 , 560
-54 , 260
•40 , 000

646,000

951,765

715 , 500

•69 , 500

- 236 , 265

396,000
290,000
40,000550. 500
382 , 000
438 . 150

416 , 000
307 . 500
40 , 000•20,000•17 .500-1 34 . 500- 74 , 500-398 , 150------------------ -- ---- -- ----------------- -- ---- ---- -- --- ------------- ---- -- ---- ---- -- --- -- --------- ------------------ -------- --- -ENERGY PROGRAMSENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY

Sust ainable Transporta ti on:
Ve hi cle Tech nolog i es .

Bioenergy Technologies .
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Te chnolo gi es .

Subt otal, Sustainable Transportation.

------- ----- -- -- ---- -- ----- - --- --------- ----------- ----- --------------

Renewable Energy :So lar Energy Techno logies .... . .. .. .... . . , .
Wind Energy Technologies.

Water Power Technologies .
Geothermal Technol og ies . ......... .. .. . ... .. .
Renewable Energy Grid Integration.
Subtotal, Renewable Energy .

Energy Eff ic i ency:
Advan c ed Manufacturing.

Building Tec hnologies.
Federal Energy Management Pr og ram . . .. .. .... . . . . . . . .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY{Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
Enac te d

FY 2022

Final Bi ll

Fi na l Bill

RequestFinal Billvs Ena c ted

v s Reque st

390 , 000
10 , 000
21,000313 , 000
6 , 000
15 ,000+3, 000+1, 000+15,000- 77 ,000-4 , 000- 6, 000

3 15,000

421,000

334,000+19,000- 87 , 000

62,50062,50025 , 000
300, 000

63,00010 , 000+500+1 0,000

20 , 000+20, 000+500-1 5,000- 300,000+20 ,000-- ---- -- --- ·--- -·---- -- ------- ---- -- ---- ------- ---- ------- --------- ------- --- -- -- --- ------- ---- -----· -------- --- -- ---- -- -- --- --- ---Weather i zation and Inte rgovernmental Pr ogram:
Weatheri zat io n :Weatherization Assistance Program .
Training and Te chn ical Assistance .
Weather i zation Readiness Fund .

Subtotal , Weatherization .
State Energy Program Gra nts .

310,000
5 , 000--- ---- ----- · · ------- -- --·-· ----- ---- -----

Loc al Government Clean Ener gy Workforce Program ..

Bui l d Back Better Challenge Grants .
Ener gy Future Grants .

Subtotal. Weatherization and Intergovernmental
Program.

Subtotal , Energy Efficiency .
Corporate Support :Fac ilities and Infrast ructure :National Renewa ble Energy Laboratory ( NREL ) ..
21-EE-001, Energy Materials Processing at Sca l e( EMAPS) ,Subtotal, Facilit ies and Infrastruc t ure .

-------------- -- --- ---- ----- -------------377,500

808,500

427 ,000+49, 500-381,500

1 ,1 03 , 500

2, 179 , 150

1 , 190,500+87 , 000

-988,650

130,000

167 , 000

140,000+10 , 000

-27,000

8,000

8 , 000+8 , 000

175,000

148 , 000

+18, 000--- ----------- ----- ---- -- --- -- ------------

130,000-27 , 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Program Di reel ion
Strategic Programs .
Subtotal, Corporate Support.

Subtotal, Energy Eff ic iency and Renewable Energy.

Congressionally Directed Spending.
Rescission . .
TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY .

FY 2021
EnactedFinal Bi 11

Final Bi ll

RequestFina l Billvs Enacted

vs Req uest

165 ,000
14 ,500

250,000
43,585

209 , 453
20. 000+44 ,453+5,500-40 , 547
-23,585309,500

468. 585

377. 453+67 ,953-91, 132

2,864,000

4 , 732 , 000

3 , 122 . 953+258 , 953-1 .609 . 047

77,047+77 , 047
+2 , 240+77.047

FY 2022-2 , 240
2,861,760

4 , 732,000

3,200 ,000

+338 , 240- 1 , 532,000

96,00048,000135 ,000

1 29.804
18,00019 , 000
16 , 000
3 , 000+33 . 804
-48 , 000
+18 , 000
+19 ,000+4 ,000+3 , 000-5 , 196

25,00025,00016,000+3, 000

185 , 804

+29 . 804

-15 , 196

CYBERSECURITY , ENERGY SECURITY , ANO EMERGENCY RESPONSE

Risk Management Technology and Tools.
Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration.
Response and Restoration.
Information Sharing, Partnerships and Exercises.
Program Di reel ion .
Congressional 1 y Di reeled Spending.
TOTAL , CYBERSECURITY, ENERGY SECURITY, ANO
EMERGENCY RESPONSE .

12 , 000

156,000

201.000- 7.000-6,000DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi11
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

48,22050,00037,00043,50050,00026,00023,00055,000-22, 220+23 . 000
+5 , 000-11, 000-20, 500+5 , 000

57,00023,00072 , 000
47 ,000

73,00047,000+16 ,000+24, 000+1 , 000

80,000119,000

120,000+40, 000+1, 000

25,00022,500

11,15011,000-1 3, 850
-11, 500

10,00020,0008,000
20,0002,850+11, 150+3, 500-1, 000+1, 000+2, 000+2, 850

277,000+65, 280-50, 000

ELECTRICITY

Transmission Re1iability and Resilience.
Energy Deli ve ry Grid Operations Technology .
Resilient Otstr1 but 1on Systems.

Energy Storage :Research .
Construction : 20-0E-100 Grid Storage Launchpad .
Subtotal, Energy Storage.
Cyber R&O.
Transformer Resi 1 i ence and Advanced Components.
DCEI Energy Mission Assurance.

Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance.
Prag ram Direction . .
Congressi anally Directed Spending.
TOTAL, ELECTRICITY ..

7,500
1,000
7,000
18,000211,720

327,000-2, 000+2 , 850

DEPARTHENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bi 11

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

5,000
5 , 000

6 , 000

6,000+1,000-5,00028 , 000
35 , 000
30 , 000
29 , 869

47,00035,00042,00029,00030,00033,00025,000+1,000-5,000+3, 000-4,869-18 , 000
-5 , 000-9 , 000+25,000

122,869

124 , 000

117,000-5,869-7,0002,000
40,000

2,000

2,000

33,07545,000-40,000+45,000+11 , 925

35 , 075

47,000+5 , 000+11 , 925--------- --- --··------ -------- ----------- --- ----- --- ------ ------------------ -- -- ------ ---------- -------- -------- ------ ------ --- ----NUCLEAR ENERGY

Integrated
STEP R&D .

Nu clear Energy Enabling Technologies :Crosscutting Techno 1 ogy Oeve l opment . .

Joint Hodel ing and Si mulation Program . .. ..... . . ,,.
Nuclear Science User Facilities .

Transformational Challenger Reactor .
Subtotal, Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies .

-------------- -------------- -------------------- ---- -- -- --- -----------

Fuel Cycle Research and Development:
Front End Fuel Cyc 1e :Mining , Conversion, and Transportation .
Civil Nuclear Enrichment.

Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability .
Subtotal , Fr ont End Fuel Cycle .
Material Recovery and Waste Form Development .
Advanced Fuels :Accident Tolerant Fuel s .
Tri so Fuel and Graphite Qualification .
Subtotal, Advanced Fuels .

-------------- ----- ----- ---- -------------42 . 000-------------- ------ --------

25,00035,00030,000+5,000-5,000105,800
36,000115 , 000
36,000115,000
37,000+9, 200+1,000+1,000141 , 800

151,000

152,000+10,200+1,000-------- ------ ------- --- ---- ---------------------------- -- -- -- ----- ---DEPARTHENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Fuel Cyc le Laboratory R&D .
Used Nuclear Fuel Di spas it ion R&D.
In tegrated Waste Managemen t System.

Subtotal, Fuel Cycle Research and Deve 1 opment.
Reactor Concepts RD&O:
Advanced Small Modular Reactor RD&D. .... ·· ··· · ·Light Water Reactor Sustainability .
Advanced Reactor Technologies.

Subtotal , Reactor Concepts RD&D.

Versatile Test Reactor Project :Other Project Costs .
21-E-200 VTR Project ..
Subtotal , Ver sat i 1e Test Reactor Project . .

FY 2021
EnactedFinal BillFi nal Bill

RequestFY 2022
Fina l Billvs Ena cted

vs Request

20 ,000
62,50018 , 000

46,92562,50038,00023,15050 . 000
18 , 000+3 , 150- 12, 500

-23,775-12,500-20, 000

309. 300

368,500

320,150+10 ,850-48 ,350

115 ,000
47. 000
46 .000

115,000
60 , 000
65,000150 ,000
48 , 000
59 , 000+35, 000+1, 000+13. 000+35 . 000
-12 , 000
-6. 000

208,000

240,000

257 . 000

+49 , 000

+17 , 000

43 , 000
2 . 000

55,00090,000-43 , 000
-2,000- 55,000-90.000

45. 000

145 ,000-45 ,000-145 ,000----·-····---- --------- ----- ---------------------------- ------------ -- -----------···-------------- ----- ------- -- ----------- ----------- --- --- ------- --------------------- ---- -------- ----- ------ ----- --------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands )Advanced Reactors Demon strati on Program :National Reactor Innovation Center.
Demonstrat ion 1.
Demonstration 2.
Risk Reduction for Future Demonstrations.
Regulatory Development.
Advanced Reactors Safeguards.

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

30,000BO, 000
80,00040,00015,0005,000

55, ODO
108,700
136,650
50,00015,0005,000

55,00030,00030,000115,000
15,0005,000-------------- - - - - - - - - - - Subtotal, Advanced Reactors Demonstration
Program.
Infrastructure :ORNL Nuclear Facilities O&M.
INL Facilities Operations and Maintenance .
Research Reactor Infrastructure--- --------------

250,000

370,350

250,000

20,000280,000
11 , 500

300,000
15 , 000

20,000295,000
15,000

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Bil 1
vs Request+25, 000-50,000-50,000+75,000-78,700-106,650+65. 000-------------- --------------120,350+15,000+3, 500+20,000-5,000DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

Construction :16 - E - 200 Samp 1e Preparation Laboratory , I NL.

Subtotal, Infrastructure .
Idaho Sitewid e Safeguards and Security .
International Nuclear Energy Cooperation .
Program Direct ion .

26 , 000

41 , 850

41,850+15,850

337,500

356 , 850

371 , 850

+34,350+15,000

149 , 800
75.131

149,800
5,000
85,000149,800
3,000
80,000100 , 000

+3,000+4,869+100,000-2, 000-5,000+100.000

1 , 507,600

1 , 850.500

1 , 654 , 800•147,200- 195 ,700

86. 300
40 , 000
23 , 000
79 . 000
108 , 100
32. 900
53 . 000
14,50010.000150 , 000
63 , 000
38,000117 , 000
82.00036 ,500
45 , 000

99,00049,00029,00097,00094,00033,00053, ODO
15.000+12,700+9,000+6,000+18 , 000
-14.100+100-51 , 000
-14 , 000
-9.DDD- 20 , 000+12 , 000
-3 . 500+8 , 000+15 . 000

446,800

531 .500

NEUP . SBIR/STTR , and TCF .
TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY ..... . . . . . . .... . . • .. .

FOSSIL ENERGY AND CARBON MANAGEMENT
CCUS and Power Systems:

Carbon Capture.
. .... , ... , ...
Carbon Dioxide Removal .
Carbon Utilization.
Carbon Storage . ............... .. ......... . . . . , . , . . . ,Advanced Energy and Hydrogen Systems .
Crosscutting Research . ................... .. . .. . .. . . .
Mineral Sustainability.
STEP (Supercritical CO2).

Tran sformati onal Coal Pilots .. ... .. ...... .. . .. . .. . . .
Subtotal. CCUS and Power Systems .

-------------- -------------- --·--- ------- 469,000+500-10,000--- --- -------- ------------- +22. 200- 62.500

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)Natu ral Gas Technologies.

FY 2021
Ena c led

FY 202257,000130 , 000

Request

F1nal Bill

Final Billvs Ena c ted

vs Request-57 ,000-130.000

Final Bi l l

Unconven ti ona 1 Fossi 1 Energy Technol ogies fromPetroleum
Oil Technologies .
Resource Technologies and Sustainability .

46 ,000

Program Direction .

61 , 500
700
83 ,000
55,000Special Recruitment Programs .
NETL Research and Operat i ans.
NETL Infrastructure.
Congressionally Directed Spending.
TOTAL, FOSS ! L ENERGY ANO CARBON HANAGEMENT

66,800700
83,00078 ,000

110,000
66,800
1,001
83 .000
75. 000
20,199-- ----- ·· ···-- -- ------- -- --- -- -----------750 , 000

890 . 000

825 , 000=========----- -------------- ==============NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES .
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE ..

...... .... . . . ... .. ....

SPR PETROLEUH RESERVE ..

-46 ,000+110 . 000+5. 300+301+20 , 000
+2 0 , 199+75 . 000

13,65013. 650+644

197,000

219.000+31 , 000

1 . 000

7,350

7 . 350+6, 350

126,800

129 ,087

6 . 500
126,800-3 . 000+20 .1 99-65,000-------------- --------------

13 , 006

ENERGY INFORMATION ADHINJSTRATION.

+301----------- --- --------------

188 , 000NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE.

+110 , 000

6 . 500+22 , 000

+6 . 500+2 . 287+2 , 28 7

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedFY 20 22
Reque s t

Final Bi 11

Final Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

2,500
115 ,554
110,933
88,1132,100
3,000-3 , 000

3,100
116 ,203
129 , 337
66 , 120
2 , 100

3,100
121 ,203
119 ,340
66 , 120
2,100

+600
+5 , 649+6, 407+7+5,000-9 ,997

319 , 200

336,660

333,663+14 ,663

134 , 701
240,000

105 , 000
196 ,995

105,000
240,000-29. 701

367 , 193

397,311

392,911+25, 716-4,40046 ,639

5,000

6,900

-37 ,739+3,900NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility
Gaseous Diffu sion Plants .

Small Sites ...

West Valley Demon st ration Project .
Management and Storage of E 1 ementa 1 Mercury .
Mercury Receipts .
Use of Mercury Receipts .

TOTAL , NON - DEFENSE ENVIRON MENTAL CLEANUP.

-3 , 000+3 , 000-4,997URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION
AND DECOMMISSIONING FUND

Oak Ridge .
Nuclear Facility D&D , Paducah.

......... . . ....

Portsmouth :Nuclear Facili ty D&D , Portsmouth .
Construction :15-U-406 On-site Waste Disposal Facility .
Portsmouth . .
20-U-401 On-site Waste Disposal Facility (Cel 1
Line 2&3) .

Subtotal, Portsmouth. .. . .. .. . .. . ... . .. . . . . .. .

16 ,500

65,23565,235-------------- -------------- -------------430,332

467 ,546

467,046+41,005+46. 73 5-------------- -------------+36 ,7 14-50 0

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Pension and Community and Regulatory Support.
Title X Uranium/Thorium Reimbursement Program.
TOTAL, UED&D FUND.

Final BillFY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

30,9675,000

26,29933,50031 , 799
16,155+832+11, 155+5, 500-17, 345

841,000

831,340

860,000+19, 000+28, 660

846,055

911,000

906,000+59, 945-5,000168,945

129,000

129,000-39,945

1,015,000

1 , 040, 000

1 , 035, 000+20,000

SCIENCE

Advanced Scientific Computing Research:
Research.
Construct ion:
17-SC-20 Office of Science Exascale Computing
Project (SC-ECP).
Subtotal, Advanced Scientific Computing
Research.

-5, 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

1 . 856,000

1 , 995. 800

2,003.800+147,800+8, 000

33,00028,10028,100-4,900160,000

101 , 000

101,000-59,000

52,00017 , 000

17,000-35,000-------------------------- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bas i c Energy Sci enc es:
Research

Construct i on :13-SC - 10 LINAC coherent 1 i ght source II( LCLS-11) , SLAC.
18-SC-10 Advanced Photon Source Upgrade (APS-U),
ANL.
18-SC-11 Spall ati on Neut ran Source Proton Power
Upgrade (PPU), ORNL.
18 - SC-12 Advanced Light Source Upgrade (ALS-U),
LBNL
18-SC-13 Li nae Coherent Light Source-II-High
Energy (LCLS-11-HE) , SLAC .
19-SC-14 Second Target Stat ion (STS) , ORNL .
21-SC-10 Cryomodul e Repair and Maintenance
Facility.
Subtotal, Construction.
Subtotal, Basic Energy Sci enc es .

62,00075,10075,100+13, 100

52,00029 , 000

50 , 000
32,00050,00032. 000-2, 000+3, 000

1 , 000

1 , 000

1 , 000

389,000

304,2 00

304,200

2,300 , 000

2,308,000-------------- ----------- --- --------------------------- -------------- -------------2,245,000--- ----------- --------------84, 800-------------- -------------+63, 000+8, 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Biologi cal and Environmental Research.
Fusion Energy Sciences
Research .

Construction :14 -SC- 60 U. S . Contributions to ITER (U.S. ITER) .
20-SC-61 Hatter in Extreme Conditions (MEC)
Petawat t Upgrade , SLAC .
Subtotal , Construct ion.
Subtotal, Fu sion Energy Sciences.

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bill

EnactedRequestFinal Billvs Enacted

vs Request

753. 000

B2B , OOO

615,000+62.000-13,000

415,000

449. 000

460,000+45. 000+11 ,000

242 , 000

221,000

242,000

15 , 000

5,000

11,000------- ------- -------------- ------------- 257,000+21 ,000-4.000+6,000-------------- --------------

226 . 000

253,000

672 , 000

675.000

713,000+41,000+36 , 000

777. 065

762,000

610,000+32,935+26 , 000

171 , 000

176,000

176,000+5 , 000-------------- -------------- ---------------4 , 000+27,000-------------- --------------High Energy Physics
Research .

Construction :11- SC-40 Long Baseline Neutrino Facility I Deep
Underground Neutrino Experiment (LBNF/OUNE),FNAL .
11-SC-41 Muon lo electron conversion experiment ,FNAL. .
16- SC-42 Proton Improvement Plan II (PIP-II),
FNAL.

2,000

13 , 000

2,000

79. 000

90,00090,000252,000

279.000

26B,OOO

1 , 029,065

1,061,000

1 , 076.000------- ------- -------------- ------ -------Subt ota l . Construction.
Subtotal, High Energy Physics .

----- --------- -------------- --- ----- -------11 .000+11 ,000----- --------- --- ------ ----+16 ,000

-1 1 .000-------------- -------------+46,935+17 , 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Nuclear Physics :Research.
Construction:
14-SC-50 Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, HSU
20-SC-52 Ele c tron Ion Coll ider , BNL.

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

624, 700

700,000

708,000+83, 300+8, 000

5 , 300
5 , 000

20 , 000

20 , 000-5,300+15,000

Subtotal I Construction .. . .. . ...... . . .

10,30020.00020,000+9,700Subtotal. Nuc lear Physics.

635 , 000

720, DOD

728,000+93,000+8,0 00

66,00078, DOD

70. 000+4,000-8. 000

12,00012,00012,00012,00012,00012,00078,00090 , 000

82,000+4. 000-8 , 000

Accelerator R&D and Production .
Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists .

16 , 935
29 , 000

24 , 000
35,00018 , 000
35 , ODO+1 , 065+6 , 000-6.000Science Laboratories Infrastructure :Infrastructure Support :Payment in Lieu of Taxes . . . ....... . . .
Oak Ridge Landlord.

4 , 650
5,860

4,820
6,430

4 , 820
6,430

+17D
+57D

Isotope R&D and Product ion :Research:
Construction:
20-SC-51 US Stable Isotope Production andResearch Center, ORNL.
Subtotal , Const rue ti on.

Subtotal,

Isotope R&D and Product ion.

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands}

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
Re quest

Final Bi 11

Facil it1es and Infrastructure . ... . .. . . . . . .
Oak Ridge Nuc I ear Ope rat ions .

29, 790
26,00017 , 200
20 , 000

Subtotal , Infrastructure Support .

66,30048 , 450

10,25023,00020,00022 , 000
20 , 000

10, 250

10, 250

38,000
21 ,500
35 , 000

38,00021,50035,00026 , 000
27,500
10 ,000

26,00018 , 000
10,00012 , 000

21,000Construction :17-SC -7 1 Integrated Engineering Resear c h Center,
FNAL .
18-SC-71 Energ y Sciences CapabnHy, PNNL .
19-SC-7 1 Science User Support Center, BNL .
19-SC-73 Tr anslatio nal Research Capability , ORNL .
19- SC-74 BloEPIC, LBNL .
20-SC-71 Critica l Util i ties Rehabilitat ion
Project , BNL .
20-SC-72 Seismic and Safety Modernization, LBNL.
20-SC-73 CEBAF Renovation and Expansion , TJNAF
20-SC-74 Craft Resources Support Facility , ORNL
20-SC- 75 La rge Scale Collaboration Center , SLAC

20,0005,000
2,000
25,00011 , 000

Final Bi ll
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Re quest

14 ,450
26,000- 15 ,340-2 , 750+6 , 000

51 , 700-14 , 600

+3, 250-23,000+18 , 000
- 500
+1 5,000+6,000+13 ,000+8 , 000-25 , 000
+10 ,000-9, 500+9,000DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedRequestFinal 8i 11

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

13 , 000
500
500

6,400
10 , 000
12 , 850

6,400
10 , 000
10,400-6,600+9 , 500+9,900

500
500
150

10 ,000
13 ,300
7,750

8,500
10,5007,750+8,000+10,000+7,600

150
150

2,000
2,000

2,000
2,000

+1 ,850+1 ,850

1 , 000

1,000+1,000

1,000

1,000

+1 , 000

Final 8i 11

vs Request

20-SC-76 Tritium System Demolition and Disposal,
PPPL .
20-SC-77 Argonne Utilities Upgrade ,ANL

20-SC-78 Linear Assets Modernization Project . L8NL
20-SC- 79 Critical Ut i 1 it ies Infrastructure
Revitalization , SLAC
20-SC-80 Utilities Infrastructure Project, FNAL

21 -SC- 71 Pri nee ton Plasma lnnovat ion Center , PPPL .
21-SC- 72 Critical Infrastructure Recovery &Renewal, PPPL .

21-SC-73 Ame s Infrastructure Modernization .
22-SC-71 , Critical Infrastructure Modernization
Project (CIHP), ORNL.

- 2,450-1 ,500-2, 800

22-SC-72, Thomas Jefferson Infrastructure
Improvement s (TJII), TJNAF .

Subtotal, Construction :173 , 700

246,550

239 , 300

+65, 600-7 ,250

Subtotal, Science Laboratories Infrastru ct ure .

240,000

295 , 000

291 , 000

+51, 000-4 ,000

121,000
192,000

170 , 000
202 , 000

170 , 000
202,000+49,000+10 ,000

7,026,000
7,440,000=========----- =======:====================

Safeguards and Security .
Program Direction . ......... . . ... .
TOTAL , SCI ENCE .

7 , 475 ,000

+449 . 000+35 , 000============== ===== =::::=======

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amo unts in thousand s)

NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL ..................... .. •. . •. . •. .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill27. 500

7.500

27,50011 , 095
8 , 375

11 , 095
8.375•11 , 095
+8,375

19 .470

19,470+19,470

386 , 500
13 . 500

12,0008,000+12, 000+8, 000-374,500-5. 500

400 , 000

20.000•20,000-360.000

392 , 000
35 , 000

463 , 000
37 , 000

414 , 000
36,000•22 .000+1,000-49 , 000
-1,000427,000

500 , 000

450 , 000

+23,000-50 ,000

Final Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request•20 . 000TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONSTechno 1ogy Transitions Programs .

Program Di rec ti on .
TOTAL . TECHNOLOGY TRANSITIONS .
CLEAN ENERGY DEMONSTRATIONS

Demonstrat ions.
Program Direct ion .
TOTAL , CLEAN ENERGY DEMONSTRATIONS .
ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY
ARPA-E Projects.

Program Direction.
TOTAL , ARPA-E ....•... . ..•..... . ............•.. . .

DEPARTHENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY - CLIMATE
ARPA-C Projects . .

Program Direction . .

180,000
20,000- 180 , 000-20,000

TOTAL , ARPA-C .

200,000-200,000

TITLE 17 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PGH
Administrativ e Expenses.
Title XVII Loan Guarantee Credit Subsidy .
Offsetting Collection .
Rescission of emergency funding.
TOTAL, TITLE 17 - INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN .

32,00032,000150,000-3 , 000

32,000-363. 000

179 , 000

29,0005,000-1 ,908,000

5,000

5 , 000-1 , 903,000

5,000

5,000

-3 ,000-392,000-150,000-3,000+392,000+392,000

GUARANTEE PROGRAMADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM
Administrative Expenses .
Rescission of emergency funding .
TOTAL , ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES .

+1,906,000+1,906,000-150 , 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousan ds)

EnactedFY 2021

FY 2022
RequestF i nal Bill

2,000

2,000

2 , 000

2,000

2,000

2 , 000

17 , 000
5 , 000

116,477
5,523

22,000

Final Bil l

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

52 , 477
5 , 523+35 , 477
+5 23-64,000

122,000

58 , 000+36 , 000

-64, 000

5. 5825 , 000
53 , 590
10,169140,200
2,500
26,825
159 , 301

5,582
6,000
56,591
20,000232,258
1,500
30,500
193,617

5. 582
6 , 000
56 , 59 1
20,000197 ,000
1 , 000
28 , 000
170, 115+1 ,000+3, 001+9 , 8 31+56 , 800
-1 , 50 0+1 , 175+1 0 , 814-35 ,258-500-2 , 500-23,502403 , 167

546,048484 , 288

+81 , 121

-61, 760

MANUFACTURING LOAN PROGRAMTRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM

Admin i strative Expenses .
TOTAL, TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM .
INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS

Indian Energy Program .
Program Direct ion .
TOTAL , INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS .
DEPARTMENTAL AOM IN I STRATI ON

Salaries and Expenses :Office of the Secreta ry.
Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs .
Chief Financial Officer.
Economi c Impa ct and Diversity.
Chief !nformat1 on Office r .
Artificial Intelligence and Technol ogy Off i ce .
Internati anal Affairs .
Other Departmental Administration.

Subtotal, Salaries and Expenses . . ... . . . .... . . .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in t housands)

Strategic Partnership Projects.
Subtotal, Departmental Administration.
Funding from Other Defen se Activities .
Total, Departmental Administration (Gross)
Mi scel 1aneous revenue s.
TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (Net) .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFina l 8i ll

40 ,000

40,00040 ,000

Final Bi l l
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

443,167

586 , 048

524 , 288

+81 , 121

-61 , 760

- 183 ,789

-163,710-183,710+ 79· 20, 000
-81 , 760

259,378

422,3 38

340, 578+81, 200-93 ,378-100 ,578-100,578• 7 , 200

166,000

32 1 ,760

240 , 000

+74 , 000

57 , 739

78,00078, ODD•20 . 261

12,444 ,825

18,790 , 230

16,116,024+3,671 , 199• 81 , 760

OFFI CE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
Office of the Inspector General ..

TOTAL, ENERGY PROGRAMS.

-2 , 674, 206

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thou sand s)

FY 2021

FY 2022

Ena ct ed

Request815,710
256,9221,000,314

Bi l lFina l Bil l
vs Ena c ted

541 , 000
53 , 000

771 , 664
207,157
1 ,080 , 400
10,000691,031
72 , 000

77 1 , 66 4
207 , 15 7
1 , 080 , 400
10 , 000
691 , 03 1
72,000-44 ,046-49 , 765
+80,086+1 0 , 000+1 50 , 03 1
+19 , 000

2 , 666 ,946

2 , 83 2 , 252

2,832,2 52+1 6 5, 306

102 , 67 9
169 , 220
94 . 766
91 , 669
98 , 456
117 , 297
14 2 , 84 1
363 , 555

+1 02,67 9+169 , 220+9 4 , 766+91 , 669
+98 , 45 6+117 , 29 7
+14 2 , 8 41+363. 555

Fi na lFina lBill

vs Request

ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIESNATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATI ON
WEAPONS ACTIVITIESS\ockpi le Management :Stockpile Major Modernization:
861 Life Extension Pr ogram .
W88 Alteration Program.
WB0-4 Li fe Extens i on Program ., ..... . . . .. .

W80 - 4 Alterati on-SLCM.

W87-1 Hoctification Program
W9 3.

Sub to ta I ,Stockpile Maj or Hoderni zat ion .

---- --- ------- -- ------- --- ·· -- ------ --- ---------- ---- --- --------------

St ockpile Su s tainment :B61 Stockpile sy s tems .
W76 Stockpi 1 e system s .
W78 Stockpile sys t ems.
W80 Stockp1 le systems.
B83 Stockpile systems .
W87 Stockpile systems .
W88 Stockpile systems .
Multi-Weapon Systems .
Subt otal , Stockp i le Sustainment .

----- -- ------- --- --------··· ------- ---- --1,180 , 483+102 ,679+1 69 , 220+94 , 766
+91 , 669
+98 , 456
+117 , 297+142,841+363, 555------- ------- --------- --- -+1 , 180 , 483+1 , 180 , 48 3

DEPARTMENT OF ENE RGY(Amounts in thousands)

Stockpile Sustainment.
........ ... . .. .
Weap ons Dismantlement and Disposition.
Pro duction Operations . .

Su btotal, Stockpile Managemen t.
Production Mode rnization:
Primary Capab1lity Modern i zation :Plutonium t1odernizat ion:
Los Alamos Plutonium Operations .
21-D-512 , Plutonium Pit Production P roject , LANL
Subtotal , Los Alamos Plutonium Modernization.
Savannah River Plutonium Operations .
21 - 0 -511 , Savannah R1 ver Plutonium Processing
Facility, SRS .

FY 2021
Ena cted

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

998 ,357
56 ,000
568,941

1 , 180,483
51,000568,941

56 ,000
568 , 941--···--------- --·-------- --- -··-----·- ----

Enterprise Plutonium Suppo rt .
Subtotal, Plut o ni um Modernization.
High Explosives & Energetics .

Fi nal Bi ll
vs Request- 998 , 357- 1 . 180 ,483
+5 ,000--- - ····---··· ·---- ---------

4,290 ,244

4 ,632,676

4 , 637,676+34 7 , 432

610,599
226,000

660,419
350,000

660,419
350 , 000

+49 , 820
+1 24,000

1 ,0 10,419

1,01 0 ,419

+173 ,820-------------- ---------- ---- -- -- --------- 836,599
200 , 000

128,000

128 , 000

-72,000

24 1. 896

475 ,000

475,000+233 , 104

441 , 896

603,000

603. 000+161 , 104-- -- ---------- -------------- --·----- -- ---Subtotal, Sava nnah Ri ver Pluton i um
Hodern i zat io n.

Final Billvs Enacted

90,782

107 , 098

107 , 098

+16 , 316

1,369,277

1 ,720,517

1 ,720 , 517+351 , 240

63 ,62068, 785

68,785+5, 165--- ----------- --- ------·---- ------ --- -----+5 ,000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(A moun ts i n thousands)

HESE OPCs.
Subtotal, HE & Energetics .

Subtotal . Primary Capability Modern izat ion .

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bill

Final Bill

EnactedRequ est

Final Billvs Ena cted

vs Reque s t

67,37068, 785

68 .785+1 ,415

1 , 436 , 647

1 , 789,302

1 ,789 . 302+352 , 655

488.097488. 097•488 ,097- 242,732-63,957-1 10, 915- 39, 400

3, 750

Secondary

Uranium
Process Technology Development.
Depleted Uran i um Moder nization .

Lithium Modernizatio n .

-3, 750

242,732
63,957110,915
39,400···· --------- - ------------ -- ---···· · ·- ---Subtotal , Seco ndary Capability Modernization.
Tritium a nd Do mesl ic Uranium Enrichment :Tritiu m Sustai nment and Modernization .
Domestic Uranium Enr ich ment .

HEU Oownblend .
Urani um Reserve .

457 , 004

488 . 097

488. 097+31 , 093

489 , 0 17

489.017+489. 017
- 312, 109-70,000-90 , 000
-75 , 000

3 12 ,109
70 , 000
90,00075,000-------------- -------------- ----- --- -----Subtotal , Tritium & DUE.

Non-Nu c l ear Capabilit y Modernization .
Subtotal , Prod uction Moderniz a ti on .

547 , 109

489 , 017

489 , 017

-58 , 092

107 . 137

144 .563

144,563•37 , 426

2,547,897

2,910.979

2,910.979+363 , 082

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedStockpile Research, Technology , and Engineering :Assessment Sc i ence:Primary Assessment Technologies.
Dynamic Materials Properties.
Advanced Diagnostics.
Secondary Assessment Technologies.
Enhan ced Capabilities for Subcritical
Experiments.
Hydrodynamic & Subcri ti cal Execution Support.
Subtotal, Assessment Science
Engineering and Integrated Assessments:
Archiving & Support.
Deli very Env1 ronments.
Weapons Survivability.
Aging & Lifetimes .
Stockpile Responsiveness.
Advanced Certification & Qualification.
Subtotal, Engineering and Integrated
Assessments.
Inertial Conti nement Fusi on.
Advanced Simulation and Computing.
Weapon Technology and Manufacturing Maturation:
Surety Technology.
Weapon Technology Development.

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

689,578
150,000
130,981
35,98984,000150,000
130,981
35,98984,000215,579
152,845

215,579
152,845-------------- -------------- -------------769,394

689,578

769,394-689,578+150, 000
+130,981+35, 989+84,000+215,579+152,845-------------- -------------+79,816

336, 766
45,76039. 235
59 , 500
62,26070,00060,64945, 760
39,23559,50087. 260
50,00060,330-------------- -------------- --------------

Final Billvs Request+25 , 000
-20.000-319-336,766+45, 760+39 , 235
+59,500+87. 260+50,000+60,330-------------- --------------

337,404

336, 766

342,085+4, 681+5, 319575,000
732,014529. 000
747,012292. 630

580,000
747,012292,630+5. 000+14.998+292.630-54. 365-131. 692

+51 , 000

54,365
131,692

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts i n thousa nd s)

FY 2021
Ena cted
Advanced Manufac turing Deve l opment .
Subtotal, Weapo n Technology and 11a nufac tu ri ng
Matu ratio n .

FY 2022
RequestFi na l Bi 11

111 ,908

Final Billvs Enacted

Fi nal Billvs Request-111 , 908

297 , 965

292 ,630

292 . 630

-5,335

101 , 912

95,64 5111,912+10 , 000

+16 ,267

Subtotal. Stockp ile Research , Technology , andEng in eeri ng.

2.813 . 689

2,690,63 1

2,843, 033+29 , 344

+152,40 2

Infrastructure and Operations :Operations :Operations of fac ilities .
Safety and environmental ope rat ion s .
Ma i ntenance and repair of facilities ..... . . ... . .. .

1 . 014 , 000
165 , 354
667,000

1, 014,000
165 ,354
670,000

1 . 014 . 000
165 ,354
700 . 000

+33 , 000

+30. 000

1 , 846,354

1 , 849 ,354

1 , 879.354+33 , 000

+30,000

Academic Programs.

Subtota l, Operations .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousand s)
FY 2021
EnactedRecapitalization :Infrastructure and safety.
Capability based investments ..
Planning for Pr ogramma tic Construction (Pre-CD-1) .. .
Sub to ta 1 , Recapitalization.
I&O Construction:
Programmatic Construct ion:
06-D-141 Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12 .
07-D-220-04 TRU Liquid Waste Facility , LANL .
15-D-301 HE Science & Engineering Facil lty, PX .
15-D-302 TA-55 Reinvestment project Ill, LANL .
17-D-640 U1a complex enhancements project. NNSA ..
16-D-620 Exas ca le Computing Facilit y Modernization
Project , LLNL .
16-D -650 Tritium Finishing Facility, SRS .
16-D-690 , Lithium processing facility , Y-12
21-D-510 HE Sy nthesis, Formulation , andProduct ion, PX .

22-D-513, Power Sources Capabi 1 i ty , SNL ..

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

600,000
167 , 566
10,000+26 ,263+36 ,449+91,336+44 , 500
+10 . 000

573,717
149,117
10,000506,664
143 ,066

732. 634

651,730

797. 566+64, 732+145.636

750 , 000
36,667
43 ,000
30,000160,600

524,000

600 , 000
30 . 000+76,000+30 , 000

27,000135 ,000

27 , 000
135 , 000

-150,000-6,667-43,000-3,000-25,600

29 , 200
27,000109 , 405

27,000167 ,902

27.000167,902+56,49744,50013,62744,50013,627+13 ,500+13 , 627-------------- ---------- ---- ---------- ----

31 . 000------------- - ---------------29, 200

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Enact edFY 2022
RequestFinal S ill

Fina l Bi ll
vs Enacted

169,427

138,123138. 123-31, 304

1 ,386,319

1 , 077 , 352

1,183 , 352-202. 967

FY 2021

Chemistry and Metallurgy Replacement (CMRR):
04-0-125 Chemistry and meta l lurgy replacement
project, LANL
Subtotal, Programmatic Construction and CHMR

Mission Enabling :15-0-611 Emergency Operations Center, SNL.
15 - 0-612 Eme rgency Operations Center , LLNL .
19-0-670 136kV Power Transmission System
Replacement, NNSS
22-0-514 Digital Infrastructure Capability

36, 000
27,000-36 , 000
-27,000

59, DOD-59 , 000

Subtotal, l&O Co nstru ct ion: ..... . . . . .

Subtotal, Infrastructure and Operations.
Secure Transportation Asset:
STA Operations and Equipment

Program Direction .

. .... . .. ... .............. .. . .

Subto tal, Secure Transpor tation As set.

+106 , 000

8,000

8 .000+8, 000

122, ODO

8 , 000

8 , 000- 114 , 000

1 , 508 ,319

1 , 085, 352

1 , 191 , 352-316 ,967+106 ,000

4,087,507

3 , 586,436

3,868 , 272-219,235+281 , 836

225 ,000
123,684

213,704
117 ,060

21 3, 704
117 , 060

-11 , 296
-6 , 624

348,684

330, 764

330,764-17, 920

763,078

824 ,623

821 , 090

+58, 012

Expansion , LLNL .

Subtotal, Mission Enabling .

Fina l Bi 11
vs Requ est

Defense Nuclear Security :Defense Nucl ear Secu rity (ONS).

-3 , 533

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousan ds)

Construction:
17-D-710 West End Protected Area Reduction
Project, Y-12.
Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Security.

FY 2021
Enac te d

FY 2022
Request26. 000

Fina l Bi ll
Bi 11

vs Enact ed

23 , 000

23,000- 3,000

Fina l789,078

847,623

844 ,090•55 ,012

Information Technology and Cyber Security .
Legacy Contractor Pensions {WA).

366,233
101.668

406 , 530
78 , 656

406. 530
78 , 656• 40,297-23 . 01 2

TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES ........ . .. . •.

15,345 , 000

15 , 484 ,295

15 ,920,000•575 , 000

110,000
40 . 000
190. 711
60 , 000

100,660
42,100200,186

100,660
42 .1 00
200 .186-9 , 340+2 , 100+9 , 475-60 , 000

400 .711

342,946

F inal Bi llv s Request-3 . 533+435,705

DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION

Haterial Hanagement and Minimization :Conversion .
Nu c lear Materi a l Removal.
Hat er i al Disposition.
Laboratory and Partnership Support .
Subtotal, Material Management and Minimizat io n .

-------····--- -------------- ---- --------·342 , 946------------ -- ---- --·----·-·-57,765

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amou nt s in t housands)
FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
Reques t

Final Bi 11

Fi na l Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

Global Material Security :Internationa l Nuclear Security .
Domestic Radiological Security .
International Radiological Security .
Nu clea r Smuggli ng Detection and Deter re nce.

78 , 939
185 ,000
90,000175 , 000

79,939158,00285,000175 ,000

79 , 939
158,002
95 , 000
198 , 500

+1, 000- 26 , 998•5 , 000+23 , 500

+10 ,000+23,500

Su btota l, Global Materia l Secu rit y.

528,939

497 ,941

531,441+2 , 502+33 , 500

148,000
40 ,000

184,795

184 , 795

+36 ,795-40, 000

255,000
267 ,000
20 ,000
59,900269 , 407
271 , 000

269,407294,500
20,000100 ,329
45 , 000+14 , 407
+27 , 500

Nonpro liferation and Arms Control ..... ...... , .. . .. . .. .
Nati onal Techn ica l Nuclear Forensics R&D .
Defense Nu clear Nonpro li ferat ion R&D :Pro liferati on Detection .
Nuc lear Detonation Detecti on.
Nonproliferation Fuels Development .
Nonproliferation Stewardship Program.
Nat ional Technical Nuclear forensics.

87,32945 , 000----- ------- -- -------------- --------------+40 , 429
+45,000

Subtotal , Defense Nuclear Nonproli fera ti on R&D .

601 , 900

672,736

729 , 236

+127 , 336

Nonpro liferation Construction:
18-D-15D Surplus Plut o nium Disposition Projec t , SRS.

148,589

156,000

156,000• 7 , 411

156 ,000

156,000+ 7 , 411

Subtotal, Nonprolifera t ion Construction .

148,589+23 , 500
+20,000+13,000+56, 500

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Nuclear Counterterrorism and Incident Response :Emergency Operations .

Counterterrorism and Counterproliferation .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

36,000341,513

14,597356,185

14,597356, 185-21, 403+14 , 672

377,513370, 782

370 .782-6, 731

14,34838,800-330, 000

38,800+24,452

2,260,000

1 ,934,000

2 , 354,000+94,000

568,000
64. 700
135,000
530,600
51 . 700

640,684
55,000126 ,000
594 , 017
55 , 579

640,684
55,000126,000
594,01755,579+72. 684-9 .700-9.000+63 , 417
+3 ,879

330,000
4 , 000

348. 705

400 , 000

+70 , 000
-4,00041,6205 , 100

41 , 620
5 , 100

Final Billvs Request

Subtotal, Nuclear Counterterrorism and In c ident
Response .
Legacy Contractor Pensions (DNN) .

Rescission .
TOTAL , DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION .

+330 . 000+420 , 000

NAVAL REACTORS
Naval Rea ctors Development .
Columbia-clas s Rea c tor Systems Oeve l opment.

S8G Proto! ype Refueling ..
Naval Reactor s Operations and Infrastructure .

Program Direction .
Construction :14-D-901 Spent Fuel Handling Recapitalization
project . NRF .
21-0-530 KL Steam and Condensate Upgrades .
22-D-531 KL Chemistry and Radiological Health
Building .
22-D-532 KL Security Upgrades.
Subtotal • Construction.

-------------- -------------- ---- ---------334 , 000

395,425446 . 720

+51 ,295+41,620+5, 100-------------- -- -----------+112, 720+51 , 295

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
En acted

Rescission .

FY 2022

RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted- 6,000

TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS .

FEDERAL SALARI ES AND EXPENSES ... .. ..•. . • .. • • . .

TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION.

Fi nal Billvs Request+6 , 000

1 , 684 , 000

1 , 860, 705

1,918 , 000+234 ,000

443. 200

464 , 000

464,000•20 , 800

19,732 , 200

19,743 , 000

20 , 656 . DOD+923. 800

4 ,987

3,987

3 , 987- 1, 000

232. 4 79
670,000
8,621

196, 000
689, 776
5,121254. 479
650. 926
8. 62 1

+22 , 000
- 19 , 074

15,0008,000
1 5,200
12,8008,000
15 , 200
12 , 800- 7,000+15 , 200
+12 , 800

· ---- ·--·· ··· ·15,00036,00036 , 000--·------ -··-- ··--- ----- ---- ·--- ·--· ------···-···----- ------------····

950 , 026

+23 , 926

+ 23. 129

+57 , 295

+913,000

DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP

Closure Sites Administra tion.
Richland:River Corridor and Other Cleanup Dperat i ans
Central Plateau Remedia ti on.
RL Commun ity and Reg u l atory Support.
Construction:
18-0-404 WESF Modifications and Capsu l e Storage .
22-0-401 L-888, 400 Area Fire Station.
22-0-402 L-897, 200 Area Water Tre atment Facility.

···········--- --- ·· · -·······
Subtotal, Construction.
Subtotal , Richland.

926,100

926,897+58 , 4 79
-38 , 850
+3 , 500--- ------ ----- ·----------···+21 , 00 0

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Office of River Protection :Waste Treatment and Immobi 1 i zat ion Pl ant
Cammi ssioni ng.
Rad Liquid Tank Waste Stabilization and Disposition.
Construction:
01-D-16 D High-level Waste Faci I ity.
01-D-16 E Pretreatment Facility .
18-0-16 Waste Treatment and lmmobil ization Plant LBL/Direct Feed LAW .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFina l BillFi nal Billvs Enacted

Final Bil 1
vs Request

50 ,000
784 , 000

50,000817,642

50 , 000
837 . 642

+53 , 642

+20 , 000

25 , 000

60,00020,000144 ,3 58
20 , 000+1 19 , 358+20 , 000

+84 , 358

786,000

586 ,000

586 , 000

-200 , 000

811,000

666,000

750 , 358

- 60 , 642

7,000

7 ,000+7,000

1 , 645 , 000

1, 540.642

1 , 645,000

430 , 000

358,925432.313-------------- --- ------ ----- -------- --- --Subtotal , Construct ion ... .......... ... . .... .
ORP Low-level Waste Off site Disposal .
Subtotal , Office of River Protec tion ..... .. .... .
Idaho National Laboratory:
Idaho Cleanup and Waste Di sposition ..... . ... . . .

+84. 358+104 , 358+2 , 313+ 73,388

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Idaho Community and Regulatory Support.
Construction:
22-D-403 Idaho Spent Nuclear Fuel Staging Facility
22-D-404 Additional ICDF Landfi 11 Disposal Celland Evaporation Ponds Project

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bill

Final Bi 11

EnactedRequestFinal Billvs Enacted

vs Request

3,500

2,656

2,658

-B42

3,000

3,000

+3, 000

5,000

5,000

-------------- -------------- -------------Subtotal, Construction

8,000

8,000

-------------- -------------- -------------Total, Idaho National Laboratory.
NNSA Sites and Nevada Off sites:
Lawrence Livermore Nati ona 1 Laboratory

Separations Process Research Unit
Nevada . .

Sandi a National Laboratory.
Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Los Al a mos Excess Facilities D&D.
LLNL Excess Facilities D&D.

Total, NNSA Sites and Nevada Off-sites.
Oak Ridge Reservation:
OR Nuclear Facility D&D.
U233 Disposition Program.
OR Cleanup and Disposition.

+5, 000-------------- -------------+B, 000-------------- --------------

433,500

369,583

442,971+9, 471

1 , 764
15,00060, 737
4,860
226,000

1,806
15,00060, 737
4,576
275,11958, 3B1
35,0001, B0615,00075, 737
4,576
275,119
17,00035,000+42

35,000-------------- -------------- -------------343,361
450,619424,238

254, 132
55,000112,471

274,923
55,00073, 725

337,062
55,00073,725+73,388+15, 000-284+49, 119+17 ,000+15,000-------------+80,B77--------------+82, 930+62, 139-38,746-41, 3B1-26, 3B1

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Construction:
14-0-403 Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility.
17-0-401 On-site Waste Disposal Facility.
Subtotal, Construction.
DR Community & Regulatory Support.
OR Technology Development and Deployment ...

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

20,50022,38012,50012,500-20, 500-9, 880

42,88012,50012,500-30,380

5,900
5,000

5,096
3,000

5,096
3,000

-804
-2, 000

Final Billvs Request-------------- -------------- -------------Total , Oak Ridge Reservation.
Savannah River Site:
SR Site Risk Management Ope rat i ans:
SR Site Risk Management Ope rat i ans.
Construction:
18-0-402 Emergency Ope rat i ans Center
Replacement, SR.
19-0-701 SR Security System Replacement.
20-0-402 Advanced Manufacturing Collaborative
Facility (AMC).

475,383

424,244486,383+11, 000+62, 139

500,000

452, 724

459,090-40,910+6, 366

6,500
1,000

8,999
5,000

8,999
5,000

+2, 499+4,000-25,000

25,000-------------- -------------- -------------Total, SR Site Risk Management Operations.
SR Community and Regulatory Support.
SR Radioactive Liquid Tank Waste Stabilization and
Disposition.

532,500

466, 723

473,089-59, 411+6, 366

11,5495,805

11,805+256+6,000910,832

890,865

889,365-21, 467-1, 500

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY( Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bill

EnactedReque s t

Final Bi 11

vs Enac ted

vs Request

68 , 000
19 , 500

68 , 000
19 , 500-10,716+2,500+18 , 938

76 , 778

87 . 500
130 , 882

87,500130,882+10 , 722
+130,882

1,531,659

1 , 581,775

1 , 592,641•60, 982+10,866

313 , 260

350,424

353 , 424

+40 , 164

+3, 000

35,00055,00010,00055 , 000
25 , 000

65,00025,000+30,000-30 , 000
-10 , 000

+10 , 000

413 , 260

430,424

443 , 424

+30 , 164

+13 , 000·-------------- -- --------------------------- -- -------------------------------------- ---- -------------------------- -----------------Construc t ion :17-0-402 Sall s tone Disposal Unit #7 , SRS .
18-0 - 40 2 Salt s tone Disposal unit #8 / 9 .
20-0-401 Salt s tone Disposal Unit #10 , 11 , 12.
Subtotal, Construction.

10 , 716
65 , 500
562

Savannah River Legacy Pensions.

Total , Savannah River Site .

Waste Isolati on Pilot Plant :Waste Isolation Pilot Plant .

Construc tion :15-0-411 Safety Significant Confinement
Ventilation Sy s tem, WIPP.
15-0-412 Exhau s t Shaft, WIPP ............... .. .. .
21-0-401 Hoi s ting Capability Project .

Total, Wa s te Isolation Pilot Plant .

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

Program Direc t ion .
Program Support.
Safeguards and Secu r ity.
Technology Development .
Subtotal , Defense Environmental Cleanup .

FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

289,000
12 , 979
320 , 771
30 , 000

293,106
62,979316,744
25,00 0305,20762,979323,144
30,000.............. ·········-- - -- -··· · ·-·······
6 , 426 , 000

6 , 426 . 000

6 , 426 , 000

6,841,670

Federal Contribution to the Uranium Enrichment D&D
Fund .
TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request+16,207+50, 000+2 , 373+12 , 101

6 , 710,000+284 , 000

6 ,710,000+284, 000

- 131 . 670

573,333+573, 333

+5 73 , 333

132,732-1, 588+1, 588415,670

DEFENSE UED&D.

Subtotal , Environment , Health, Safety and Security

134,320

132,732+284 , 000-415 , 670

OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

Environment, Heal th, Safety and Security:
Environment , Heal th, Safety and Security.
Program Direction· Environment , Health, Safety andSecurity.

+6 , 400+5 , 000·····--------- ····- - ---- ·· ··72,00073, 588

73. 588

206,320206. 320

206 , 320

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Fina l Bi 11

EnactedFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

24,43554,63527,33556 ,049

27,33556,049+2, 900+1, 41479,07083. 384

83,384+4,314

283,500

283,500

328,500+45, 000+45 , 000

Legacy Management Activities - Defense.
Program Direction - Legacy Management.

142,797
20,262408, 797
19,933

158,797
19 ,933+16,000-329-250,000

Subtotal, Office of Legacy Management.

163,059

428,730

178. 730+15, 671-250, 000Defense Related Administrative Support
Office of Hearings and Appeals.

183, 789
4,262

163,710
4,356

183,710
4,356

- 79
+94

+20, 000

TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES.

920,000

1 , 170. 000

985,000+65, 000-185. 000

27,078,200

27,754,670

28,924,333+1,846,133+1,169,663

FY 2021

Enterprise Assessments:
Enterprise Assessments.

Program Direction.

Subtotal.

Enterprise Assessments.

Specialized Security Activities .
Office of Legacy Management :TOTAL , ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIESDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousa nds)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11
vs Ena cted

Final Bi ll

Fi nal Bill

66 , 163
11,246

88 , 339
7 ,28466 , 353
7 , 284+190- 3 , 962

-21. 986• 21 , 986

vs Request

POWER MARKETING ADMIN ISTRATIONS ( 1)
SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and Maintenance
Purchase Power and Wheeling.

Program Direction . .

Subtotal, Operation and Mainte nance ..
Less Alternative Financing (for PPW) .
Less Alternative Financing (for PD).
Offsetting Collections (for PPW).
Offsetting Collections (for PD).

TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADHINISTRATI ON.

77 , 409

95 , 623

73 ,637-3 , 772-14, 163.4 ,000• 52,000• 7 , 246

-13, 353-100• 74,986• 7, 184- 13 , 353-100• 53,000• 7 , 184

+8 10
+3, 900- 1 , 000+62

+21 , 986

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Am ounts in thousands)

FY 2021

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11

Enac ted

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

13,29254,00035,635
13,267

11, OB2
93,00036 ,833
15,901

11,08262 , 000
36 , 833
15,901-2 , 210+8 , 000+1 , 198+2, 634

SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
Operation and MaintenanceOperation and Maintenance .
Purchase Power and \.Jheeling.

Program Direction.

Construction.

---------- --- - ----- ---- --- -- ---- -----------31, 000-------------- -- -- -- ---- ----

Subtotal , Operation and Maintenance .

116,194

156 ,816

125 , 816

+9, 622-31, 000

Less A 1 ternat i ve Financing ( for O&M).
Less A1 ternat i ve Financing ( fo r PPW).
Less A1 ternat i ve Financing ( fo r Construction).

-5,635- 20, 000
-8, 167-852-31 , 483
-5, 657-34 ,000-4 ,591-23,000-1 0, 901

-4 . 591- 23,000-10 , 90 1

-33,529-4,395- 70,000-33 , 529
- 4, 395- 39 , 00 0

+1,044-3,000-2, 73 4+852-2 , 046+1 ,262-5, 000+31, 000l ess Alternative Financing (for PO) .
Offsetting Collections (for PO).
Offsetting Collections (for O&M).
Offsetting Co11 ect ions (for PPW).

------------ -- -- ---· ---- ---- -------------TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION .

10,40010.40010 , 400----------- --- --------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Sill

Final Billvs Enacted

26 , 251
77 . 874
485 . 890
253 , 575

35 , 185
81.983589. 677
267 . 246

35 .185
81 . 983
443.677
267,246+8, 934+4, 109-42, 213+13 , 671

843,590974,091828.091-15 , 499

-6,297-20,353-48, 546-293,890-145,010-24 ,744- 7 , 122
-31 , 090
-51, 849-273 . 677-166 , 935-27 , 530

- 7,122-31 , 090
-51 , 849
-273 , 677-166,935-27 .530-825-10, 737-3,303+20,213-21,925- 2,786-192 , 000-316 , 000-170.000+22, 000-8.378-15,000-9 . 116-9, 116- 738+15, 000

89. 372

90. 772

90, 772+1 .400

FY 2021

Final Billvs Request

WESTERN AREA POWER AOMINISTRATION

Operation and Maintenance :Construction and Rehabilitation .

Operation and Maintenance .
Purchase Power and Wheeling .

Program Direction.
Subtotal, Operation and Maintenance .
Less Alternative Financing (for O&M) .

Less Alternative Financing (for Construction) .
Less Alternative Financing (for PD) .
. ........ ,Less Alternative Financing (for PPW} .
Offsetting Collections (for PD) .
Offsetting Collections (for O&M).
Purchase Power & Wheeling Financed from Offsetting(P . L . 108-447 / 109-103) .

Offsetting Collections - Colorado River Dam (P . L.
98-381) .
Use of Prior-Year Balances .
TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION .

-146,000-146,000+146 , 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022

Final Bill

Final Bill

RequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request-1, 526

7,545-5. 580-1. 73 7

7,545-5, 580-1 , 737

+243
-32
-211

228

228

228

100. 000

101,400

101,400+1, 400

404 , 350
-404,350

463,900-463, 900

466 , 426
-466,426+62 , 076
-62,076

FALCON AND AHISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
Falcon And Amistad Operation And Maintenan c e.

7. 302

Offsetting Collections - Falcon and Amistad Fund .
Less Alternative Financing - Falcon and Amistad Fund-5, 548

TOTAL.

FALCON AND AHISTAD O&H FUND.

TOTAL,

POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
FERC Revenues .
TOTAL , FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COHHISSION .

+2 , 526-2, 526

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedReque stFina l Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Ena c ted

vs Request- 282, 133-6,000-282,133-6,000-282 . 133-6 , 000-286 , 133-288 . 133-286. 133

44 .855.62 4( 45,143,757)(-288, 133 )+5, 230 , 599( +3 , 216,492)(-285,893)-1 ,790,676(-1,838,543)(+47.867)

Final Bill

General Provisions

Colorado River Basin Fund (305( b) ) .

2 , 000

2,000+2. 000

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction Project99-0-143 Rescission .
Naval Reactors Rescission .
Total , General Provisions . .

GRAND TOTAL. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY .
(Total amoun t appropriated).
(Rescissions).
( Re sciss ion s of emergency funding) ..

2 , 000

39 , 625.025(4 1 , 927.265)( -2 . 240 )( - 2 , 300 . 000)

46 . 646,300(46,982.300)( -336, 000)

( + 2 , 300. 000)

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bill

Final Bill

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

2,861,760
156,000
211 , 720
1,507,600
750,000
13,006
188,000
1,000
6,500
126,800
319,200
841,000
7,026,000
27,5004,732,000
201 , 000
327,000
1 , 850,500
890,000
13,650197,000
7,350

3,200,000
185,804
277,000
1,654,800
825,000
13,650219,000
7,350
6,500
129,087
333,863
860,000
7,475,000
27,50019,47020,000450,000+338, 240
+29, 804+65, 280+147,200+75,000+644+31, 000+6, 350-1, 532,000-15, 196-50, 000-195,700-65, 000

29,000+392, 000

SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Cybersecuri ty, Energy Security, and Emergency Response

Electricity.
Nuclear Energy.

Fossil Energy and Carbon Management.
Nava 1 Petroleum & Qi l Shale Reserves.

Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
SPR Petroleum Account.
Northeast Home Heating Oi 1 Reserve.
Energy Information Administration.
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup.
Uranium Enrichment D&D Fund.

Science.
Nuclear Waste Disposal.

Technology Transitions.
Clean Energy Demonstrations ..
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.

427,000

Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate.

Title 17 Innovative technology 1 oan guarantee program.

-363,000

126,800
338,860
831,340
7,440,000
7,500
19,470400,000
500,000
200,000
179,000+2,287+14,663+19,000+449, 000
+19,470+20, 000+23, 000+22,000+6,500+2,287-4,997+28,660+35,000+20,000-380,000-50,000-200,000-150,000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(Amounts ; n thousands)

FY 2D21

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Fi na lEnac t ed

RequestFinal Bi l l

vs Enacted

vs Re ques t-1 , 903,000
2.000
22 ,000
166 , 000
57 ,739

5,000
2,000
122 .000
321,760
78,0005 , 000
2 ,000SB, 000
240 , 000
78. 000+1, 906,000+36, 000+74 , 000
+20 , 261

- 64, 000
-81 , 760

15 ,345 ,000
2 , 260.000
1 , 684 ,000
443 ,200

15, 484,295
1,934,000
1 , 860 , 705
464 ,000

15,920 ,000
2 ,354 ,000
1 , 918 ,000
464 ,000+575 ,000+94 , 000
+234 ,000+20 , 800

+435, 705
+420,000+57 ,295

Bi 11

Advanced Technology Veh icles Manufactu ring Loan

Program .
Tr i bal Energy Loa n Guarantee program .
Indian Energy Pol icy and Programs . .
Departmental administrat ion ..
Office of the Inspector Genera 1 .
At o mi c Energy Defense Acti v ities:
Nat io na l Nuc lear Security Administration :Weapons Act ivities.
De fense Nuclear Nonprol i fe ration .
Naval React ors .
...... ............ . .. . .. .. ..
Federal Salaries and Expenses .
Subtota l , Nati an al Nuclear Secu rity Adm i n .

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activit i e s .

.... . ... . .

Powe r Marketing Administrations ( 1 ):Southeastern Power Administration .
Southwestern Power Administration
Weste rn Area Power Admini s trat1on.
Falcon and Ami stad Opera ti ng and Mainten ance Fund.
Total, Powe r Marketing Administ ra ti ons.

-------- ---- -- -- --- --------- ------------- --------------- ------------- -19,732 ,200

19,743,000

20,656 , 000+923 , 800+913 ,000

6, 426 ,000

6,8 41 ,670

920,000

1 , 170 ,000

6,7 10,000
573,333
985,000+284 ,000+573,333+65 , 000

-131, 67 0+573 , 333-1 85, 000-------- ----- - ------- ----- -- ----------- ----------------- ------------ --27,078.200

27,75 4 ,670

28,924 , 333+1 ,846,133

10 , 400
89 ,372
228

10,40090,77 2
228

10,40090 , 772
228+1 , 400

100 , 000

101 , 400

101, 400+1,400+1 , 169 ,663

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY(A mounts in thousands)

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and Expenses ..
Revenues .
General Pr ovis i on :Colorado River Basin Fund (305 (b)).
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction
Project 99-D-143 Rescission .
Naval Reactors Rescission.
Subtotal, General Provisions

Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy .

1/

Tota ls in c lude alternative financing costs,
reimbursable agreement funding , and power purchaseand wheeling expenditures. Offsetting collectio ntotals reflect funds collected for annual
expenses , including power purchase an d wheeling

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

404 ,350-404,350

46 3,900-46 3, 900

466,426-466, 426

+62 ,076-62, 076+2 , 526-2 , 526-282. 133
-6 ,000-282 , 133-6,000-282 , 133-6,000-286, 133

-288 . 133-286, 133

44,855,624+5. 230,599- 1.790,676

2 ,0002 , 000

2. 00039,625,025

46 , 646,300+2,000TITLE IV-INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
APPt\LACI IIAN RHilONAI COMMISSION

The agreement provides $195,000.000 for the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). The
following is the only direction for the Appalachian Regional Commission.
The agreement includes $13,000,000 to address the substance abuse crisis that disproportionallyaffects Appalachia.
Within available funds, $8,000,000 is for Local Development Districts.
Within available funds, not less than $15,000,000 is for counties within the Northern Appalachianregion to support economic development. manufacturing, and entrepreneurship.
Within available funds, $65.000,000 is for the POWER Plan.
Within available funds,$ I 0.000,000 is provided to continue the program of high-speed broadband
deployment in distressed counties within the Central Appalachian region that have been most negatively
impacted by the downturn in the coal industry.
Within available funds, $15,000,000 is provided to continue a program of high-speed broadband
deployment in economically distressed counties within the North Central and Northern Appalachianregions.
Within available funds, not less than $16,000,000 is provided for a program of industrial site andworkforce development in Southern and South Central Appalachia, focused primarily on the automotive
supplier sector and the aviation sector. Up to $13,500,000 of that amount is for activities in Southern
Appalachia. The funds shall be distributed to states that have distressed counties in Southern and South
Central Appalachia using the ARC Area Development Formula.
Within available funds, $16,000,000 is provided for a program of basic infrastructure
improvements in distressed counties in Central Appalachia. Funds shall be distributed according to ARC'sdistressed counties formula and shall be in addition to the regular allocation to distressed counties.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding high-poverty areas.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding clean energy activities.

DU:ENSI: Nl !Cl.EAR Ft\l'ILITII S St\FETY 80t\RD
St\LARll:S t\ND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $36,000,000 for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

77

DEi.TA RH,IONAI. Al!THORITY
SAi.ARiES AND l'XPENSES

The agreement provides $30, I 00,000 for the Delta Regional Authority.
Within available funds. the agreement includes not less than $15,000,000 for flood control, basic
public infrastructure development, and transportation improvements. which shall be allocated separate fromthe state fonnula funding method.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding high-poverty areas.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding clean energy activities.

Dl ' NALI COMMISSION

The agreement provides $15,100,000 for the Denali Commission.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding high-poverty areas.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding clean energy activities.

NORTlll :RN BORDER Rl:<ilONAI. COMMISSION

The agreement provides $35 ,000,000 for the Northern Border Regional Commission.
Within available funds. not less than $4,000,000 is for initiatives that seek to address the decline in forestbased economies throughout the region, $1 ,000,000 is for the State Capacity Building Grant Program, and$5 ,000.000 is for broadband initiatives.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding high-poverty areas.
The agreement reiterates House direction regarding clean energy activities.
The agreement reiterates Senate direction regarding projects that demonstrate evidence ofplanning for climate resiliency.

Sot !Tl !LAST CRESC ENT RH.ii< >NAI. Cc lMMISSION

For expenses necessary for the So utheast Crescent Regional Commission in carrying out activities
authorized by subtitle V of title 40, United States Code. $5 ,000,000 to remain available until expended. The
recent appo intment and co nfinnation of a Federal Co-Chair is welcome news, and the agreement supports
expeditiously moving forward to start up and establish the Commissio n.

78

SOlJTIIWLST BORDER RHrlONi\L COMMISSION

For expenses necessary for the Southwest Border Regional Commission in carrying out activities
authorized by subtitle V of title 40, United States Code, $2.500,000 to remain available until expended. The
Administration is encouraged to promptly appoint a Federal Co-Chair in order to establish key partnerships
with local communities and improve economic conditions and travel along the southwest border.

NlJCLFAR RHilJLATORY C< >MMISSIONSALARIES AND EXPENSES

The agreement provides $873,901,000 for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This amount isoffset by estimated revenues of $745,258.000, resulting in a net appropriation of $128.643,000.

Integrated University !'rogrum.-The Commission is directed to use $16,000,000 of prior year,
unobligated balances for the Integrated University Program, including for grants to support research
projects that do not align with programmatic missions but are critical to maintaining the discipline of
nuclear science and engineering. Because the Commission has already collected fees corresponding tothese activities in prior years, the agreement does not include these funds within the fee base calculation for
determining authorized revenues and does not provide authority to collect additional offsetting receipts fortheir use.

,ldvanced Nuclear Reactor Regulatory lnfrastrw.:ture.- The agreement includes $23,000,000 forthe development of regulatory infrastructure for advanced nuclear technologies, which is not subject to theCommission's general fee recovery collection requirements.
(Dollars in thousands)

Account

Final Bill

Nuclear Reactor Safety.. ..
.... .. .... ..... .
Integrated University Program. .
. ... .. .. .. .. . ........ .
Nuclear Materials and Waste Safety .............. .... ............. .
Decommissioning and Low-Level Waste ..... ... ..... . ... ..... .... ...... .. ..
.. .. ....... ......... .... .. ... .. . .
Corporate Support
Use of Prior-Year Balances ...

$477,430
16,000107.337
22,856266,278-16,000

TOTAL. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ... ......... ..

873,901

OH!l'F 01-' INSPFl'TOR (if'NFRALThe agreement provides $13,799,000 for the Office of Inspector General in the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission. This amount is offset by revenues of $11 ,442,000, resulting in a net appropriationof $2,357,000.
The agreement provides $1 , 146,000 to provide inspector general services for the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board.

79

NllCLEAR WASTE TECHNICAL REVI EW BOARD
SALARIES ANJ> EXPl' NSESThe agreement provides $3 ,800,000 for the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.

80

GENERAL PROVISIONS- INDEPENDENT AGENCIESThe agreement includes a provision instructing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on
responding to congressional requests for information.
The agreement includes a provision relating to reprogramming.

81

TITLE V~ GENERAL PROVISIONS(INCLUDIN<i TRANSFl::R OF Fl INDS)

The agreement includes a provision relating to lobbying restrictions.
The agreement includes a provision relating to transfer authority. No additional transfer authority
is implied or conveyed by this provision. For the purposes of this provision, the term ··transfer"' shall mean
the shifting of all or part of the budget authority in one account to another. In addition to transfers provided
in this Act or other appropriations Acts, and existing authorities. such as the Economy Act (31 U .S.C.
1535). by which one part of the United States Government may provide goods or services to another part,
this Act allows transfers using section 4 705 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2745) and 15
U.S.C. 638 regarding SBIR/STTR.
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting funds to be used in contravention of the executive
order entitled ''Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations."
The agreement includes a provision prohibiting the use of funds to establish or maintain acomputer network unless such network blocks the viewing, downloading. and exchanging of pornography,
except for law enforcement investigation, prosecution, or adjudication activities.
The agreement includes a provision making a technical correction to Public Law 117- 58.

82

DISCLOSURE OF EARMARKS AND CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING ITEMS

Following is a list of congressional earmarks and congressionally directed spending items (asdefined in clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives and rule XLIV of the Standing
Rules of the Senate, respectively) included in the bill or this explanatory statement, along with the name ofeach House Member, Senator, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner who submitted a request to theCommittee of jurisdiction for each item so identified. For each item, a Member is required to provide a
certification that neither the Member nor the Member's immediate family has a financial interest, and each
Senator is required to provide a certification that neither the Senator nor the Senator's immediate family has
a pecuniary interest in such congressionally directed spending item. Neither the bill nor the explanatory
statement contains any limited tax benefits or limited tariff benefits as defined in the applicable House and
Senate rules.

83

NERGY ANDWATER1JEVELOPMEN1]i - - - - - - - - - - ~ e . ~Community Project Funding / Congressionally Directed Spendingt

GPO- 1)0 NOT

84

SET

C?

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT/Community Pro1ect Funding/Congressionally Directed Spend ing)
Amounts shown over the pres1dent1 al budget request level ("Add1t1onal Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Con gre ssionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Am ount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the "Add1t1onal Amounr · columns due to updated proJect cap abil,t,es.

AgencyAcco unt

Pro1ect NamP.: Rec101ent

Bud getRequestAdd1t 1ona l

Tota l Amou nt

AmountProvided

Req uestor(s)Ongma lion
House

Senatf!

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Acequias Environ mental Infrastructure. NM: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers$1,500.000$1.500.000

Heinrich: Lu1ans

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construction

Beneficial Use of Dredged Materi al Pilot Program (Resilient
Sa n Franc isco Bay Pilot Pro1ect.
CAI: U.S. Army Corp s of Eng, neers

I. 775.000

1.775.000

Feinstein: PadillasArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construction

Cal averas County. Section 219.
CA: U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers

1.000.000

1.000.000

Feinstein : PadillasArmy Corps of Engineers (C1vrll

Construction

Calu met Region. IN: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

10.000.000

10.000.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvif)

Constructmn

Carolina Beach and Vrcrnity. NC:
U.S. Army Corp s of Engineers

2.000.000

2.000.000 Rouzer

Burr: Tillis

HIS

Army Corp s of Engineers (Crvll)

Constructron

Chesapeake Bay Environmental
Restoratron & Protec tion Progra m. DC. OE. MO . NY. PA. VA.
& WV: U.S. Army Corp s of Engrneers

5.750.000

5.750.000

Cardrns

Army Corps of Engineers (C1vrf)

Constructron

City of Lorain Envrronmental Infrastructu re Sewer Pro1ect. OH:
U.S. Army Corps of Engrneers3.375.000

3,375.000

Mrvan

KapturH

H

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued!Community Project funding/Congressionally Directed Spending)Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Add1t1onal Amount" column) are considered Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The 'Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the ·Budget Request" and the "Additional Amount" columns due to updated project capabilities .
AgencyAcco unt

Pro1er.t Nnm e: Rer: 101 ent

BudgetRequestAdd1t 1on~1
Amo unt

Total Amount

250 .000

250.000

34.800.000

38.375.000

ProvidedRequestor( slOrigination

House

Se nateFeinsteins

Merkley: Wydens390.000

Cardinsl.200.000

1.200.000

Cantwell : Merklet
Murray: Wydens

Delaware Bay Coastline. Oakwood
Beach. NJ : U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

5.000.000

5.000.000

MenendezsConstruction

Delaware Coast Protection. DL
U.S. Army Corps of Engineersl.200.000

1.200.000

Carper: Coonss

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Delaware Coast. Cape Henlopen toFenw,ck Island. DE: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

4.000.000

4.000.000

Carper: Coonss

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construction

Delaware Coast. Rehoboth Beach
to Dewey Beach. DE: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

7,650.000

7.650.000

Carper: Coonss

Arm y Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Conslructmn

City of Norwalk. Section 2I 9. CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construct,onColumbia River Fish M1tigat1on.
WA. OR. ID (CRFM): US Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Cumberland. MD & Ridgeley, WV:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers390.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Dalles Tribal Village Development
Plan. WA: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construct,onArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)$ 3.575.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Desert Hot Spr,ngs. Section 219.
CA: US. Army Corps of Eng, -250.000

250.000

Feinstein

s

neers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Ecorse Creek. Wayne County. Ml:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers1.675.000

1.675,000

Dingell: Tlaib

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Fa,rfax Jersey Creek. KS: U.S Army
Corps of Engineers

4.000.000

4.000.000

Davids (KS)H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Ffor,da Keys Water Quality Im provement Project . FL : U.S
Army Corps of Engineers

6.000.000

6.000.000

Gimenez

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Construction

Fort Pierce. FL: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

10.549.000

I 0.549.000

Mast

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck
Beac h (Ocean C,tyl. NJ: U.S.
Army Co,ps of Engineers

17.000.000

17,000.000

Menendezs

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Construction

Hamilton A1rt1eld Wetlands Restorat,on. CA: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

1.000.000

1.000.000

Feinstein: PadillasArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Construclmn

Harbor/South Bay. los Angeles.
CA: U.S Army Corps of Engr neers3.790.000

3.790.000

WatersFeinstein: Padilla

HIS

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construct,onIndiana Harbor. Confined Disposal
Facility. IN: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

18.395.000

Mrvan

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Conslruct,onIndiana Sho1eline. IN: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

2.700.000

2.700.000

Mrvan

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

J Bennett Johnston Waterway, LA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2.250.000

2.250.000

Letlow

H

18,395,000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued!Community ProJect Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level (.. Add1t1onal Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ·'Total Amount Provided·· column may not equal the sum of the '·Budget Request" and the "Additional Amounr· columns due to updated project capabilities.
AgencyAccount

Prn1ect Name: Rer:1p1ent

Budget

Add1t1onal

Total Amount

RequestAmountProvidedRequestor(slOng1nation
Senate

House

Leahy

s

Graham

HIS

6,025.000

Durbins

Capitos

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

l ake Champlain Basin (Section
542). VT: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers5.250.000

5.250,000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

l akes Marron and Moultrre. SC:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

19.785.000

19.785.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Madison and St. Clair Counties.
IL: U.S. Army Corps of Engr-

6.025.000

Clyburnneers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Marrtown Sanitary Sewer Extensron. Section 2t 9. WV: U.S
Army Corps of Engineers

3.t 10.000

3.110.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construction

Midwest City. OK: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

5.000.000

5.000.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civrll

Construction

Monarch-Chesterfield, MO: us.
Army Corps of Engineers

12,600.000

12.600,000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

New River. lmperral County, CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

500.000

500.000

Army Corps ol Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Ohio R1vertront. C1ncinnat1. OH:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

300.000

300.000

Cole

Vargas

H

Blunt

s

Feinstein: Padilla

H/S

Brown

s

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Otero. Bent. Crowley. Krowa. andPowers Counties. Section 21 9.
CO, U.S. Army Corps of Engrneers

7.000.000

7.000.000

Bennets

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvil)

Construction

Puget Sound and Adjacent Water
Restoration (Spencer Island).
WA: U.S. Army Corps of Engrneers

5.000.000

5.000.000

Cantwells

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Sacram ento Area Environmental
Infrastructure (City of Folsom).
CA: U.S. Army Corps of Engr neers

75,00075.000Bera

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Sacramento Area Environmental
Infrastructure (Orangevale) . CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

75,00075.000Bera

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Sacramento Area Envrronmental
Infrastructure (Rosevrlle-PCWA
Cooperative Water Reliability.
Section 219). CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

75.00075.000Army Corps of Engineers (Crvil)

Construction

San Clemente Shoreline. CA: US.
Army Corps of Engineers

9,306.000

9.306.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Section 569. Environmental lnlrastructure. Crty of Brwabrk. MN:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers926.000

926.000

Klobuchars

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Section 569. Environmental Infrastructure. Virginia Street. MN:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers926.000

926.000

Klobuchars

Army Corps of Eng111eers (Crvil)

Construction

Shepherdstown Syste m Improvements. Section 571. W'I: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

1.668,000

1.668.000

Capitos

Feinstein, PadillasH

Levin (CA)ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued[Community Pro1ect Fund1ng/Congress1onally Directed Spending)Amounts shown over the pres1dent1al budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the 'Budget Request" and the "Add1t1onal Amounr' columns due to updated project capabillt,es.

AgencyAccount

Pro1ec:t Name: Rer: 1p1ent

BudgetAdditional

Total Amount

RequestAmoun tProvided

3.246.000

3.246.000

Requestor(s)Onginat1onHouse

SP.nateJoyce (PAI

H

Mast

H

1.500.000

Rogers (KY)H

10.000.000

I 0.000.000

Higgins (LAI

Surfside-Sunset -Newport Beach.
CA: US. Army Corps of Eng,neers

15.500.000

15.500.000

Steel

Construct,onTownsends Inlet to Cape May
Inlet. NJ: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

15.500.000

15.500.000

Van Drew

Construction

Tres Rios. AZ : U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

1.841.000

1,841,000

StantonArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement (Conftuence Borough Mumc,pat Authority Water Quality Project).
PA: U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

South Florida Ecosystem Restorat,on. FL: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
KY (Martin County): U.S . Army
Corps of Engineers

1.500.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Southwest Coastal Lou,s,ana Hurricane Protection. LA, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construct ,onArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

350.000.000

350,000.000

Cassidy

H/S

H

Booker: Menendez

H/SHArmy Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Upper Mrssrssrppr Rrver- -lllrnors
WN System. IL. IA. MN. MO &WI: U.S. Army Corps of Engrneers

45.100.000

45,100.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction

Upper Ohro Navigation. PA: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers12.800.000

12.800.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Conslructron

Western Rural Water. AZ. NV. MT.
10, NM. UT & WY (Arizona Environmental Infrastructure. AZ):
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

4.000.000

4.000,000

StantonH

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvil)

Construclron

Western Rural Water. AZ. NV. MT.
ID. NM. UT & WY (Arrzona Envrran mental Infrastructure. AZ- Crty of Tolleson): U.S Army
Corps of Engineers638.000

638.000

GallegoH

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Construction

Wheeling Elm Run Flash Floodrng.
Section 219. WV: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

546.000

546.000

Army Corps of Engineers (CrvrlJConstruction

Willamette Rrver at Willamette
Falls. OR: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers6.200.000

6.200.000

SchraderArmy Corps of Engineers (CrvrlJConstruction/Section t 4

Chickasaw Park loursville/Jeflerson Co KY ICAP SEC 14). KY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

50.00050.000

YarmuthArmy Corps of Engineers (Crvrl)

Constructron/Sectron 14

Kanawha River Streambank Stabrlrzatron. WV: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineersl.836 .000

1.836.000

Manchrns

Army Corps of Engineers (Crvil)

Constructron/Sectron 14

Morgan State Unrversrty Stadium
Way Slope Stabilrzatron. MD:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

50.00050,000Van HollensBustos, Graves(MO); Hinson:
Luetkemeyer

Baldwin , Blunt
Duckworth:Durbin:Klobuchar

H/S

Casey

s

Caprio: ManchrnsMerkley, Wyden

H/S

H

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued/Community Pro1ect Funding/Congressionally Directed SpendingJ
Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending lor purposes of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the "Additional Amount" columns due to updated project capabilities
AgencyAccount

Pro1ect Name; Rec 1p1ent

BudgetRequestAdd1t1on.:ilAmountRequeslor(slTotal Amount
ProvidedOngmat1on

SennteHouses

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construct,on/Section 14

Watch Hill lighthouse. RI: US
Army Corps ot Engineers

50.00050.000Army Corps ol Engineers (C1v1II

Construction/Section 103

Reel Point Preserve. Town of Shelter Island. NY: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

50.00050.000Army Corps ol Engineers (C1v1I)

Construction/Section 103

Rondout Riverport. City of King ston. NY: U.S. Army Corps ot
Engineers100.000

100.000

Schumers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construct,on/Sectron 103

Rose Larisa Park. RI: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

50.00050.000

Reed. Whitehouses

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construct1on/Sect1on l 03

Wading River Creek. Town ofRiverhead. NY: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

50.00050.000Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Construct1on/Sect1on 107

Port of Muskegon. Ml: US Army
Corps of Engineers

100.000

100.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Construct,on/Sectmn 107

Sturgeon Poml. Town of Evans.
NY: U.S. Army Corps of Eng, neers

100.000l 00.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction/Section 205

lower Santa Cruz River. Eloyl evee. AZ: U.S. Army Corps ol
Engineers100.000l 00.000

Reed

H

ZeldinZeldinJacobs

H

Peters. StabenowsSchu mers

Kelly: S1nemas

O'Halleran

Kelly: S,nema

H/S

Schumers

Kelly: Sinema

H/S

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v,I)

Construct,on/Sect,on 205

McCormick Wash. Globe. AZ: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

100.000

100.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construct,on/Sect,on 205

River Road, Town of Rosendale.
NY: U.S. Army Corps of Eng,.

100.000

100.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v,11Construct,on/Sect,on 205

Rose and Palm Garden Washes
Flood Control Proiect. AZ: U.S
Army Corps of Engineers

100.000

100.000

Kirkpatrick

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction/Sect,on 205

Salmon River. NY: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

50,00050.000

StefanikH

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Construction/Sect,on 1135

Osage River Ecosystem Restoralion. Tuscumbia. MO & Miller
County. MO: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers300.000

300.000

Luetkemeyer

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

lnvest,gat,ons

Adams & Denver Counties. South
Platte River. CO: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

400,000

400.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvest,gat,ons

Cano Martin Pena Ecosystem Res!oration. PR: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvest,gat,ons

Columbia River Turning Basin
Nav,gat,on Improvements, WA& OR: U.S Army Corps of Eng,.
neers

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v,I)lnvest,gat,ons

Fort Pierce. St. Lucie County, FL:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v,I)lnvest,gat,ons

Great Lakes Coastal Resiliency
Study, IL. IN. Ml, MN. NY. OH.
PA and WI: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

neers

s

2,150.000

Gonzalez-Colon

200.000

200.000

Herrera Beutler

400.000

400,000

Mast

H

500.000

Joyce (OH): Katko

H

2.150.000

500,000

Bennet:Hicken looper

H

Cantwell: Murray

H/SENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued[Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending)Amounts shown over the pres1dent1al budget request level ('Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the ·'Additional Amount" columns due to updated project capabilities.
AgencyAccount

Pro1ect Name: Rec1p1ent

BudgetRequestAdditional

AmountRequestor(s)Total Amount
Provided

Origination
House

SenateArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v1IJ

lnvest1gat1ons

Hartford and East Hartford. CT:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

200,000

200,000

Larson (CT)

Blumenthal:
MurphyH/S

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

lnvest1gat1ons

Honolulu Harbor Mod1ficat1on Feas1b1l1ty Study, HI: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

800.000

800,000

Case

Hirano: Schatz

H/S

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

lnvestigatrons

Houma Nav1gat1on Canal. LA: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

350.000

350.000

Graves (LAI

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvest1gat1ons

Hudson Raritan Estuary Ecosystem
Restoration. NY and NJ: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

1.200,000

1.200,000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Investigations

IL River 519 Fox River Dams Restorat1on. IL: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers250.000

250.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

lnvest1gat1ons

Imperial Streams. Salton Sea. CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

200,000

200.000

Ru11: Vargas

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Investigations

Kentucky River. Beatyv1lle. KY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers450.000

450.000

Rogers (KY)

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Investigations

Little Colorado River. Winslow. AZ:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

500,000

500,000

O'Halleran

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

lnvest1gat1ons

Los Angeles River Ecosystem Restorat1on, CA: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

1.693,000

Gomez

1.693.000

H

Menendez:
Schumers

Durbins

Feinstein: Padilla

H/S

H

Kelly: Srnema

H/SHArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvestrgatrons

Lowell Creek (Tunnell Flood Diversron. AK: US Army Corps ofEngineers

3,000.000

3.000.000

Young

Murkowskr

H/S

Army Corps of Engrneers ICrvrl)

Investigations

Lower Missouri Basrn- -Brunswick
L~246. MO: US Army Corps ofEngrneers300.000

300.000

Graves (MO)

Blunt

HIS

Army Corps of Engrneers (Civrl)

lnvestrgatrons

Lower Missourr Basrn- -Holt County. MO. Donrphan County. KS:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

100.000

l00.000

Graves (MO)

Blunt

H/S

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil}

Investigations

Lower Missourr Basin- -Jefferson
City L-142. MO: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers200.000

200.000

Luetkemeyer

Blunt

HIS

Army Corps of Engrneers (Crvrl)

Investigations

Lower Rio Grande Valley Watershed Assessment. TX: U.S.
Army Corps of Engrneers

200,000

200.000

Vela

Army Corps of Engrneers (Civrl)

lnvest1gat1ons

Lower San Joaourn (Lathrop &Manteca). CA: U.S. Army Corpsof Engrneers200.000

200.000

McNerney

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvestrgatrons

Menominee River Deepenrng. Ml &WI : U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers200.000

Army Corps of Engrneers (Crvrl)

lnvesligat,ons

New York and New Jersey Harbor
Anchorages. NY & NJ: U.S.
Army Corps o( Engineers

Army Corps of Engrneers (Crvrl)

lnvestrgations

Northern Calrfornra Streams.
Lower Cache Creek. Yolo County. Woodland & Vicinity. CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

H

Fernstein: Padilla

H/S

200.000

Baldwrn: Peters:
Stabenows

1.125.000

1.125.000

Menendezs

2.000.000

2.000.000

Fernstern: Padilla

HIS

Garamendr

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued!Community Proiect Funding/Congressionally Drrected Spending)Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Drrected Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ·'Total Am ount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the ·'Budget Request" and the " Additional Amount" colu mns due to updated pro1ect capabil1t1es.

A~encyArmy Corps of Engineers (C1 v11)

Account

lnvestigatrons

ProJecl Name: Rec1p1ent

Port Fourchon Belle Pass Channel.
lA: U.S. Army Corps of Eng1-

Budget
ReQuestAdd1t1onal
AmountRequestoflsl

Total Amount
Provided

011gmat1onHouse

300.000

300.000

ScaliseSenateCassidy

H/Sneers
Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

lnvest1gat1ons

Port of lbe11a. tA U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

1.200.000

l.200.000

Higgins (lA)

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Investi gations

San Francisco Waterlront Storm
Damage Reduction Study. CA:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers200.000

200.000

PelosiH

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvest1gat1ons

Santa Paula Creek. CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers200.000

200.000

Brownley

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Investigations

St. Au gustine Back Bay. FL: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers200.000

200.000

Rutherlord

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

lnvest1gatrons

Tennessee Tombigbee Waterway
and Black Wa11101 andTombigbee Rivers Deepening
Study. AL & MS: US. Army
Corps of Engineers400.000

400.000

Shelbys

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

lnvest1gat1ons

Upper Des Plaines River Flooding
and Restoration. IL: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers1.525.000

1,525.000

Durbins

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

lnvest1gat1ons

Upper Turkey Creek Basin Design,
Merriam. KS: U.S. Army Corps
ol Engineers

500.000

500.000

Davids (KS)Feinstein

HIS
H

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Investigations

Watertown Flood Risk Managemen! Feas1b1lity Study, SD: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

200 .000

200.000

Roundss

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v,I)lnvest, gat,ons

W,1/ametle River Environmental
Dredging. OR: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers732.000

732.000 Blumenauer

Merkley: Wyden

H/S

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Investigations

Wilmington Harbor Navigation Improvements. NC: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

500.000

500.000

Burr: Tillis

HIS

Army Corps of Engineers !Civil)

M1ssiss1pp1 River andTributaries

Bayou Melo Basin. AR: U.S. Army
Corps of Engmeers

24.000.000

24.000.000

Boozmans

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

M1ss1ss1pp1 River andTributaries

Channel Improvement. AR. IL. KY.
lA MS. MO & TN (Tom l eePark): U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers

3.000.000

3.000.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

M1ss1ss1ppi River andTri butaries

Grand Pranie Region. AR: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

13.000.000

13.000.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C,vil)

M1ss1ss1pp1 River andTrrbutaries

Lower Miss1ss1pp1 River Comprehensive Management Stu dy,
US. Army Corps of Engineers

5.000.000

5,000.000 Graves (LAI

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v1I)

Miss1ss1pp1 River andTri butaries

Morganza to the Gulf. LA: U.S.
Army Corps of Engrneers

19.333.000

19.333.000 Graves (LA):Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

M1ssissipp1 River andTributaries

Yazoo Basin. Delta Headwaters
Pro1ect. MS: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

12.900.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v11)

M1ss1ss1ppi River andTributaries

Yazoo Basin. Upper Yazoo. MS:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

2.500.000

RouzerCohen

H

Boozmans
H

Cassidy

H/S

12.900.000

Hyde-Smiths2.500.000

Hyde-Smiths

ScaliseENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued!Community Pro1ect Fund1ng/Congress1onally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Di1ected Spending for purposes of House and Senate 1ules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget ReQuesr· and the ·'Additional Amount" columns due to updated pro1ect capabilities.
Account

Agenr..yP101ect Name: RPC1p1ent

BudgetRequestRequestor(slAdd1t1onal

Total AmountAmountProvided

7.000.000

7.000.000

Hyde-Smith:
Wickers

8.380.000

22.672.000

Shelbys

Orig1natmn

House

SenalP

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

M1ss1ss1pp1 River andTnbutaries

Yazoo Basin. Yazoo Backwater
Area . MS, U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engmeers (C1v11)

Operation and MaintenanceAlabama River lakes. Al: U.S.
Army Co1ps ol Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamie-Barcelona Harbor. NY: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineersl.150.000

1.150.000

Grllibrand,
Schumers

3.000.000

3.000.000

Shelbys

nance

15.252.000

Army Corps ol Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and Mamienance

Bayou Coden. AL: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

Army Corps ol Engineers (Civil)

Operalmn and Maintenance

Bayou La Batre. AL U S. Army
Corps of Engineers

36.0004.972.000

5.008.000

Shelbys

Army Corps ol Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MamienanceBlack Warrior and Tombigbee(BWTJ Rivers. AL U.S. A1my
Corps of Engineers

24.652.000

3.200.000

27.852.000

Shelbys

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v,I)

Operat ion and Mamienance

Bon Secour R1ve1. AL: U.S. A1my
Corps of Engmeers

4,493.000

4,493 .000

Shelbys

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamtenance

Brown's Creek. NY: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

250.000

250.000 Garbanno

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Operation and Mainlenance

Burns Waterway Harbor. IN: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

1.561.000

H

1.561.000

Mrvan

s

Feinstein

H/S

207.000

Merkley: Wydens1.612.000

Merkley; Wydens

1.000,000

B.696,000

15,016,000

Cole Rivers Hatchel)'. Applegatelake. OR: U.S. Army Corps ofEngrneers

207 .000

Cole Rivers Hatche,y, Lost Creeklake. OR: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

1.612.000

Operation and Ma1ntenance

Cattaraugus Harbor. NY: U.S
Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v,I)

Operation and Mamtenance

Channel Islands Harbor. CA: U.S
Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MamienanceArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamte-

nance

Gillibrand:
Schumer

1.000,000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

6.320.000

2.764,000

Joyce (OH)6.889,000

6.889 .000

Defazio3.023.000
5.250.000

2.764.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and MamienanceConneaut Harbo1. OH: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engmee1s (Civil)

Operatmn and Ma1ntenance

Coos Bay. OR (Ma1or Ma1ntenance); U.S. Army Corps of Engmeers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Dauphin Island Bay. Al: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienance

Dunk,rk Harbor. NY: U.S. Army
Corps of Engrneers

680.000

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and MamienanceFairport Harbor. OH: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers3.880.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienancefox Porn! Hurricane Barrier. RI:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

704 ,000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Ma1ntenanceArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Marnienance

B1ownley

H

Merkley: Wyden

HIS

3.023.000 Carl

ShelbyHIS

5.930.000

Gillibrand:
Schumers

3.880.000 Joyce (OH)H

225.000

929.000

Reeds

George's River. ME: U.S. Army
Corps ot Engineers

75.00075.000Coll mss

Houston Ship Channel (DMMP).
TX: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

1.500.000

1.500,000

Jackson lee

HENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued!Community Pro1ecl Fund,ng/Congress1onally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ··Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the 'Budget Request" and the ·'Add1t1onaf Amount" columns due to updated project capabilities.

Account

AgencyArmy Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Operalion and Mamie-

nance

ProJecl Name: Rec1p1ent

BudgetArld1tmnal

RequestAmountIndiana Harbor. IN: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

8.196.000
4.380.000

H

1.620.000

6,000.000

Masi

H

SteubeHlntracoastaf Waterway (fWW)- Jacksonville to M,am,. FL: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Ma,nte-

lntracoastal Waterway (IWW)
Caloosahalchee River to
Anclote River. FL: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

2.500.000

2.500.000

I00.000

100.000

6.900.000

23.943.000

Operation and Mami enance

Isle au Haut Thoroughfare. ME:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and Mamie-

Kanawha River Locks and Dams.
WI: U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers

17.043.000

nance

Army Corps of Engineers (C,v1I)

Operation and MamtenanceLake Providence Harbor. LA: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

1.332.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Little Sodus Bay Harbor. NY: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

6.900.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Lockwoods Folly Ri ver. NC: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

SenateMrvan

Operation and MaintenanceArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Origmal100

HouSP

8. 196.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

nance

RP.questor(slTotal Amount
Prov1clP.d

1.332.000
1.000.000

1.000.000

1.050.000

1.050.000

Collins: KmgsCapitos
H

Letlow

RouzerSchumer

s

Burr

H

8.500.000

8.500.000 Zeldin

H

4.0I0.000 Van Drew

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MamienanceLong Island lntracoastal Waterway. NY: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienance

Maurice River. NJ: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Operation and MamtenanceMerrimack Spur Jetty. MA: U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1 v1I)

Operation and Mamtenance

Mobile Harbor. AL: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and Mamtenance

Mount St. Helens Sediment Control. WA: U.S Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Oswego Harbor. NY (West A11owhead Breakwater): U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

300.000

300.000

Schumers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienance

Perd1do Pass Channel . AL: U.S.
Army Corps ol Engineers

2.000.000

2.000.000

Shelbys

A1my Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MaintenancePocomoke River. MO, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

8.000

8.000

Cardins

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Ma1ntenance

Rollinson Channel. NC: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineersl.670.000

1.700.000

Bu11s

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and MamienanceRudee In/el. VA: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers580.000

580,000

Kame: Warners

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Operation and Ma1ntenance

San JoaQum River (Port of Stockton). CA: U.S. Army Corps ofEngmee1s7.425.000

2.250.000

5.040.000

McNerney

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Ma1ntenance

Santa Ana River Basin. CA: U.S.
Army Co1ps of Engineers

6.572.000

2,500,000

9.072.000

CalvertH

4.010.000

30.212.000

240.000

240,000

32.000.000

62.212.000

918.000

30.000918.000

Markey, Warrens

Shelbys

Her,era Beutler

H

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued!Community Pro1ect Fundmg/Congress1onally Directed Spending)Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level C'Addi11onal Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ·Total Am ount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the "Additional Amount" columns due to updated pro1ect capabilities.
AgencyAccount

P101ect Name. Recipient

Bud~etAr1rlit1onal

RPquestAmountRrquestor(slTotal Amount
Provided

Orig 1natmn

SenateHouse

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v11)

Operation and Mamienance

Santa Cruz Harbor. CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

15.000525.000

540.000

femste,n: PadillasArmy Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MamienanceSearsport Harbor. ME: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

4.200.000

t.650.000

5.850.000

Collinss

Army Corps of Engineers (Crv11)

Operation and Mamienance

Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek.
NJ: U.S. Army Corps of Eng,neers

8,000.000

8.000.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienance

South Haven Harbor. Ml: US
Army Corps of Engineers

1.000.000

1.500.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and MamienanceSt. l uc,e Inlet (South Jetty Rehab1/itationl. Fl: U.S. Army Corpsof Engineers

4.800.000

4,800.000

Mast

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operatmn and MamienanceSt. l uc,e Inlet. FL U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

5.750.000

5.7 50.000

Masi

H

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operal,on and Mami enance

St. Patr1ck 's Creek. MD: US Army
Corps of Engineers

2,070.000

2.070.000

Hoyer

H

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Mamie-

St. Paul Small Boat Harbor. MN:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

500.000

500.000

McCollum

4.000.000

31.276.000

nance
Army Corps of Engmeers (Civil)

Operation and Mamienance

Tennessee- -Tombigbee Waterway(ffiW/1. Al and MS: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

500.000

28.986.000

PalloneH

Stabenows

Klobuchar: Sm,th

HIS

Shelbys1.300.000

4.423.000

Moran

s

20.00020.000

Baldwins

2.146.000

5.516.000

Brownley

Feinstein: Padilla

HIS

2.810.000

2.810,000

Himes

Blumenthal:
MurphyH/S125.000

668_000

Reeds

500.000

500,000

9.6!0.000

17.400.000

Island Mam Lateral Concrete Linmg Pro1ecl: Bureau of Reclamat,on

798.000

798.000

Bureau al Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Klamath Pro1ect. SCAOA ACQUISIIron. OR: Bureau of ReclamaIron

5.000.000

5.000.000

Bureau of Reclamalion.
Water and Related Resources

Lake Mead/Las Vegas Wash Prgm:
Bureau al Reclamat ion

3.060.000

3.655.000

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Tuttle Creek Lake. KS: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operation and Maintenance

Two Rivers Harbor. WI: U.S Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v1I)

Operation and MaintenanceVentu ra Harbor. CA: U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers

Army Corps of Engineers (C1v!I)

Operal,on and Marnienance

Westport Harbor & Sagaluck
River. CT: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Army Corps of Engineers (Civil)

Operat,on and Maintenance

Woonsocket Local Protection
Pro1ect. RI: U.S. Army Corps ofEngineers

Oeparlmenl of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

East to Wesl Conveyance Projecl(SJR lo OMCI Appraisal Study:
Bureau of Reclamat,on

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Eastern New Mexico Water Supply- -Ute Reservorr: Bureau of
Reclamation

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Department of the Interior

Department of the Interior

12.373.000

3.370.000

543.000

7.790.000

595.000

Harder (CA)H

Heinrich

GonzalesLee (NV)s
H

Merkley: Wydens

Cortez Masto:
Rosen

H/S

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued!Community Pro1ect Fundingl Congress1onally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the pres1dentral budget request level ("Add1t1onal Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ··Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the "Additronal Amount" columns due to updated project capabil1 t1es
AgencyAcr.ounlPrn1ec1 Name: Rec 1p1ent

BudgetRequestAdd1t1ona l
AmountTotr1r Amount
Provided

9.220.000

12.694.000

21.914.000

Reques101(s)Oog1nat1on

Housr

SenatP

Klobuchar:Rounds: Smith:
Thune

s

Feinstein: Padilla

HIS

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamatron,
Water and Related Resources

Lewis and Clark Rural Water Sys tern. IA. MN, SD: Bureau of
Reclamation

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamal1on.
Waler and Related Resources

Los Banos Creek Appraisal Study:
Bureau of Reclamation

Department ol the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation,
Water and Related Resources

Nava10-Gallup Water Supply
Pro1ecl: Burea u of Reclamation

56,342.000

11.000.000

67.342.000

Leger Fernandez

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation,
Water and Related Resources

Odessa Subarea. WA: Bureau of
Reclamation

1.500.000

500.000

2.000.000

Newhouse:
Rodgers (WA)

Cantwell

HIS

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamatron.
Water and Related Resources

Sacramento River Basin Flood
Plain Reactivation: Bureau of
Reclamation

5.000.000

5.000,000

Garamend1

Feinstein: Padilla

HIS

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Sacramenlo River Fish Screen Program: Bureau of Reclamation

3.900.000

3.900.000

Fernsle1n: Padillas

Department of the Interior

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Salton Sea Research Pro1ect: Bureau of Reclamation

546,000

2,546.000

500.000

2.000.000

500.000 Costa

VargasH

H

Department of the lntenor

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Re-

San Gabnel Basin Restoration
Fund, Bureau of Reclamation

I0.000.000

I0.000.000

700.000

Chu; Napolitano

Feinstein, Padilla

H/S

700.000

Murrays

950.000

l.990.000

Cantwellssources

Department of the lntenor

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Upper Yakima Bull Trout Research
Facility. WA, Bureau of Reclamat1onDepartment of the lntenor

Bureau of Reclamation.
Water and Related Resources

Wapato Irrigation Proiect. WA, Bureau of Reclamation

Department of Energy

Cybersecu rity. Energy Secunty. and Emergency
Response

Emerging Threat Information
Shanng and Ana lysis Center.
University of Arkansas little
Rock, University of Arkansas atlittle Rock1.000.000

1.000,000

Boozmans

Department of Energy

Cybersecunty. Energy Security. and Emergency
Response

Oakland Un1vers1ty Cybersecunty
Center, Automation Alley

2.000.000

2.000.000

Stabenows

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Accelerating Heat Pump Adoptmn
by Lower-Income Households,
Alaska Heat Smart

420,000

420.000

Murkowsk1s

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

As1a-Pacif1c M1crogr1d Development and Training, Hawau Natural Energy Institute. Un1vers1ty
of Hawa11

1.000.000

1.000.000

Hironos

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Blue Earth County's Energy Eff1c1ency Pro1ect; Blue EarthCounty4.330.000

4.330.000

Klobuchar, Smiths

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Built to Last Pilot Project; Philadelph1a Energy Authority

2.!00.000

2.100.000

Casey

s

I.040.000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued
ICommun,ty Pro1ect Funding/Congressionally D1rected Spending]Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Add1t1onal Amounr· column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending 101 pu1poses of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the ·'Budget Request" and the " Additional Amount'· columns due to updated project capabilities.
AgencyAccount

Pro1ect Name: Rec 1p1ent

BudgetRrquestAdd1l1ona!

Total AmountAmountProvidedRequestor{sl011g1nal100

House

SenateDurbins

Bennet:Hicken loopers200.000

Lujans344.000

344.000

Merkley, Wydens

Derry l andfill Solar Pro1ecl: Town
of Derry

500.000

500.000

Shaheens

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Development of an Elect11c Vehicle
Assoc,ate·s Degree Cu111culumStandards and Educational MaJer,als for Automotive Educators and Techn1c1ans Nationwide: West V,rg,nia Un1vers1ty

1.000.000

1.000.000

Capitos

Depa rt ment of Energy

Energy Ell,c,ency and Renewable Energy

Dist11ct Energy Construction: Burlington Elect11c Department

5. I66.000

5.166.000

Leahy

s

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Ductless Heat Pump lnstallatmn:
Verde301.000

301.000

Merkley: Wydens

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Chicago Clean Energy Retrofits
Program: City of Chicago

500.000

500.000

Department of Energy

Energy E111c1ency and Renewable Energy

Cogency Power Solar Pro1ect: Townof Rangely

5.000.000

5.000.000

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Community of Hope Solar Parking
Structure: Mesilla Valley Community of Hope200.000

Department of Energy

Energy E111c1ency and Renewable Energy

Cully Community Solar Pilot, Verde

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewa ble Energy

Department of Energy

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewable Energy

DWCPA Hydrokrnetrc Energy Har,ester: Detrort/Wayne County
Port Authority

680.000

680.000

Peters: Stabenows

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewa ble Energy

DWCPA Solar Energy Pro1ect: Detrort/Wayne County Port Authority

200.000

200.000

Peterss

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re newable Energy

Electric Future for Amerrca's Rural
Mob1lrty Stakeholders (EFARMS): Forth

1.500.000

1.500.000

Merkley: Wydens

Department of Energy

Energy Eflrcrency and Renewable Energy

Electrrcal Substatron for Garri son
Oak Busrness and Technology
Park: Crty of Dover

5.000.000

5.000.000

Carper: Coonss

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewa ble Energy

Energy Efficrent Community CrossLamrnated Timber DemonstraIron Pro1ect/Wood-frber lnsulated Panels for Modular Constructron and Retrofit Applrca trons: Unrversrty of Marn e Systern

2.000.000

2.000.000

Collins: Kings

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewable Energy

Energy Improvements for Rhode
Island Schools: Rhode Island
Oflrce of Energy Resources

5.000.000

5.000.000

Reeds

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa ble Energy

Enhanced Bmgas Collection andEnergy Recovery Pro1ecl: Narragansett Bay Commrssron

2.900.000

2.900.000

Reed: Whrtehouses

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewable Energy

Evanston Accessrble Solar Program: Crty of Evanston

500.000

500.000

Ourbrns

Department of Energy

Energy Effrcrency and Renewable Energy

Expandrng Solar Research andGeneratron for a Brrghter Energy Future: Universrty ofVermont

150.000

150.000

Sanderss

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued/Community Pro1ect Fund1ng/Congress1onally Directed Spending)Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes ot House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the " Ad ditional Amount" columns due to updated project capabilities.

AgencyAccount

Prowct Name: Rec101ent

Budge!
RequestAdditional

Total AmountAmountProvidedRequesto,lsl
Or1g1nat1onHouse

SenatP

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Fuel for Seniors, Energy Eff1c1ency,
The Towers Foundation

288.000

288.000

Blumenthal,
Murphys

Departm ent of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa ble Energy

Gnd Resilience and Equity ,n the
Energy Trans,tmn, Un1vers1ty of
Massachusetts at Amherst

995.000

995.000

Markey, Warrens

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Hanover LED Streetlight Conversion, Town of Hanover

271 .000

271.000

Shaheens

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa hie Energy

Heartland Green Energy and Manufactunng Valley lrnt,alive,
Southern Ohm Diversification
ln1t1ative

500.000

500.000

Browns

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Heat Recovery System, City of
Togiak659 ,000

659.000

Murkowsk1s

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyHybr,d Solar Testing Platform for
Cold Weather Climates, Univers1ty of Vermont

4.000.000

4.000.000

Leahy

s

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Kaua, North Shore Energy Res1I,ency Pro1ect; Kaua, Island Ut1I ity Cooperal,ve

1.000.000

1,000 000

Schatzs

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Kivalina Biomass Reactor; c,ty of
K1val1na

100.000

I 00.000

Murkowsk1sDepartment of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Klickitat Valley Health Central
Utility Plant Modernization,
Kl1ck1tat Valley Health2,500 .000

2.500,000

Murrays

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renew able Energy

Makushin Geothermal Pro1ect:
Qawalang,n Tribe of Unalaska

2.500,000

2.500.000

Murkowsk1s

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Marquette Affordable Solar Clean
Energy Planning Grant, Community Action Alger-Marquette

100.000

I 00.000

Stabenows

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

M1crogrid Integration with BIDmass Gasification as a Pathway to Hydrogen Production;
City of Ithaca

1.000.000

1.000.000

G1llibrand,
Schumers

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa ble Energy

Mun1c1pal Building Upgrades, Cityof Salamanca

303.000

303.000

Gilli brands

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

New Jersey Green Hydrogen Demonstrat1on Proiect; New Jersey
Clean Cities Coal1t1on

3.840.000

3.840.000

Booker, Menendezs

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Newport Town Office Energy Improvements, Town of Newport

250 .000

250.000

Shaheens

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Northeast Kingdom Home Weatherizahon, Rutland West Neighborhood Housing Serwce. Inc.

500.000

500.000

Leahy: Sanderss

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa ble Energy

Off-Grid res1dent,al solar proJect
on the Nava10 Nation, Nava10
Tribal Ut1l1ty Authority

1.000.000

1.000.000

Heinrichs

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Overland Industrial park Solar
Community Proiect: The Greater
Toledo Community Foundation

1.500.000

1.500.000

Brown

s

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT-Continued!Community Pro1ect funding/Congressionally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the presidentra/ budget request level ("Additional Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect f unding and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The "Total Amount Provid ed" column may not equal the sum of the "Budget Request" and the "Additional Amount" columns due to updated project capab11itres.

AgencyAccount

Pm1ecl NiimP: Rec1p1ent

Budi etRequestAdd1t1on~I

AmountTotal Amount
ProvidedRequesto1(slOn~1natmn
SenateHousP

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Oyster Ri ver Resrfiency Protect:
University of New Hampshire

1.150,000

l.1 50.000

Shaheens

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

Reducing Inequity in Access to
Solar Power, Delaware DNREC

2.000.000

2.000.000

Carper, Coonss

Department of Energy

Energy Ef11c1ency and Renewable Energy

Rio Arriba County Energy Efficient
Vehicle & Solar Charging Stalions, Rio Arriba County Government

1.000.000

1.000.000

l ufans

Depart ment of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re newable Energy

Salisbury Square Redevelopment;
Achieving Home Affordability
and Energy Res1l1ence via a
Micrognd, Randolph Area Community Development Corporalion

750,000

750.000

Leahy, Sanderss

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Renewable Energy

San Juan College Clean Hydrogen
Workforce Development Program , San Juan College

500.000

500.000

Heinrichs

Departm ent of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Renewa ble Energy

San Juan College Electric Vehicle
Techn1c1 an Certif1cat1on Program, San Juan College

50.00050.000He1nr1chs

Department of Energy

Energy Eflrc1ency and Renewable Energy

Solar Testbed, High Technology
foundation

1.900.000

1900,000

ManchinsDepart ment of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re·
newable Energy

Sustainable Energy 1n Schools andPublic Buildings: Vermont De·
partment of Public Service

1.000,000

1.000.000

Sanderss

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re,
newa ble Energy

Tacoma Public Util1ties EV charg·
1ng program: Tacoma Public
Utilities

1.000.000

1.000.000

Murrays

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re·
newable Energy

Thermal Energy Storage to Sup·port Renewable Energy Deploy·
ment: Vermont Energy Invest·
ment Corpmat1on (VEIC)

5.000.000

5.000.000

Leahy

s

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Re,
newable Energy

Twin l akes Reservoir Floating
Solar Study: City of Lima

SD0,000

SOD.DOD

Browns

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re·
newable Energy

Updated Renewable Energy Devel·
opment Feasibility Study by the
Pueblo of Zia: Pueblo of Zia

250.000

250.000

Hemnchs

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re·
newable Energy

Ut1l1ty Upgrades tor the Bedford
Landfill Solar Pro1ect: Town of
Bedford

SOD.DODSOD.ODO

Shaheens

Department of Energy

Energy Efficiency and Re·
newable Energy

Vermont Electr1ficatmn and Clean
Energy Deployment: Vermont
Public Power Supply Authonty

1.000.000

1.000,000

Sande1ss

Department of Energy

Energy Eff1c1ency and Re,
newable Energy

WMU Center tor lnterd1sc1plinary
Research on Secure. Efficientand Sustainable Energy Tech·
nology: Western M1ch1gan Uni·vers,ty

350.000

350.000

Peterss

Department of Energy

Electnc,tyCuyahoga County Utility M1crogrid
Design Pro1ect: Cuyahoga
County300.000

300.000

Brown

s

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT- Continued
ICommunrty Pro1ect Fundrng/Congressronally Directed Spending]Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level ("Add1tronal Amount" column) are considered Community Pro1ect Fundrng and Congressionally Directed Spending for purposes of House and Senate rules.
The ··Total Amount Provided" column may not equal the sum of the ·'Budget Request"' and the "Additronal Amount" columns due to updated project capabrlit1es.
AgencyAccount

ProJect Name: Rec;1p1ent

BudgelRequestAdd1t1onal
AmountTotal Amount
ProvidedRequesto,(slo,1g1nal1on
HoUSf'

SenateDepartment of Energy

Efectric1ty

Electrical transmission and drstrrbutron rnfrastruclure for PUD
No I of Lewis County: Pubfrc
Utility D,strrct No. I of Lewis
County2.500.000

2.500.000

Murrays

Department of Energy

Electricity

Village of Old Brookvrlle Vrllage
Hall expansion: 52 kW standby
backup generator: Incorporated
Village of Brookvrlle

50.00050.000Schumers

Department of Energy

Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management

Coal Communitres Regional lnnovat1on Cluster: Regmn 2 Plannrng and Development Council

4.000.000

4.000.000

Manchrns

Department ot Energy

Fossrl Ene,gy and Carbon
Management

Coal Mine Methane Solutrons:
Communrty Ottice for Resource
Efficiency/Pitkin County

1.200.000

I.200.000

Bennet;Hickenloopers

Department of Energy

Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management

Emergency Backup Generator:
Melakalla lndran Communrty

540.000

540.000

Murkowsk1s

Department of Energy

Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management

Enhanced Outcrop Methane Caplure: Southern Ute Indian Trrbe

2.500.000

2.500.000

Bennet:Hicken loopers

Department of Energy

Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management

FEED Study for the implementaIron of a Carbon Capture andSequestratron System: Lou1srana Department of Economic
Development

9.000.0DO

9.000.000

CassidysDepartment of Energy

Fossil Energy and Carbon
Management

Mercer County Gas Lrne Extension:Development Authorrty of Mercer County

2.959.000

2.959.000

Capitos

85

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022
{Amounts in thousands)

TITLE IFY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi ll

Final Bill

EnactedRequestFinal Billvs Enacted

vs Request

153,000
2 , 692,645
380,000
3,849,655
210,000

105.637
1,792,37B
269 ,688
2,502,901
204 , 400

143,000
2,492,600
370 , 000
4,570,000
212,000-10,000-199 , 845-10,000+720,345+2, 000+37, 163+700,422+100,312+2 ,067,099+7, 600

250,000
35,000206 , 000

300,000
35,000206 ,000+50, 000+300, 000

35,000199,290+2 , 000+6 , 710

5 , 000
-500

5,000

5 , 000

4,500

5 , 000- DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE - CIVIL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Cor ps of Engineers - Civil

Investigations .
Construction.
Mississippi River and Tributaries.
Operation and Maintenance .

Regulatory Program .
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Pr og ram( FUSRAP) .
Fl cod Co nt rel and Coastal Emergencies.
Expenses .

Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army {Civil
Works) ..

Re sci ss l on.
Subtotal.

-------------- -------------- -------------5,000+500----------- --- -------------+500

ENERGY AND WATER DEVE LOPM ENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2022
(Amounts in thous an ds)

FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedRequestFinal Bill

Fina l Bi ll

Fina l Bi ll
vs Enact ed

7 , 200-7 , 000+7,200- 1 , 625. 856-52. 150

vs Reques t

Water Infrastructure Financ e and Innovation Program
Account.
Harbor Maintenance Trust Fundlnland Waterways Trust Fu nd ..

14,200
1 , 625,856
52,1507,795,000

6 , 792,500

8,343,000+5 48 , 000+1 ,550 , 500

21 . ODO

20 , 000

23 , 000+2 . 000+3,000

1 , 521,125
55,87533 , 000
60,0001 , 379,050
56 , 499
33,00064,400

1 ,747 , 101
56 , 499
33 , 000
64 , 400+225 , 976+624+368, 051

Tota 1 • Bureau of Reel a mat ion.

1,670,000

1 ,53 2.949

1,901,000+231 , 000+368 , 051

Total , title II, Department of the Interior.

1 . 691,000

1, 552,949

1 , 924 . 000+233 , 000+371 , 051

Total , title I, De partment of Defense - Civ il.

TITLE I I

- DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Central Utah ProjectCentral Utah Project Completion Account.

Bureau of Rec l amation
Water and Related Resources.
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund.

California Bay-Delta Restoration.
Policy and Administrati on .

+4 , 400

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022

(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

2,864,000-2, 240

4. 732. 000

3,200,000+336. 000
+2. 240-1 , 532, 000

2,861 ,760

4,732.000

3. 200,000+338. 240

-1 , 532,000

156,000
211,720
1,357,800
149,800

201 , 000
327,000
1 , 700, 700
149,800

185,804
277,000
1,505,000
149 , 800

+29,804+65, 2BO+147,200-15, 196-50, 000-195, 700

1 , 507 , 600

1,850 . 500

1 , 654, BOO+147,200-195 , 700

750,000
13,006
188,000
1,000
6,500
126,800
319,200-3. 000
3,000

890,000
13,650197. 000
7. 350+75,000+644+31 , 000
+6, 350

126,800
338. 860

825 . 000
13 , 650
219,000
7,350
6,500
129,087
333,863319,200

338. 860

333,863+14,663

FY 2021
EnactedTITLE III - DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Programs
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

Rescission.
Subtotal.
Cybersecuri ty,

Energy Security, and Emergency Response

Electricity . .
Nuc 1ear Energy .
Defense fun c tion .

Subtotal .
Foss 11 Energy and Carbon Management .
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves .

Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
SPR Petro 1 eum Account.
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.

Energy Information Administration.
Non-defense Environmental Cleanup ..

Mercury receipts.
Use of Mercury receipts.

Subtotal.

+2,287+14,663+3, 000-3, 000-65,000+22,000+6, 500+2,287-4,997-4,997

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPHENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2022
(Amounts in thousands)

Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning
fund .

Science .
Emerg ency funding .

Subtota I .......... . . . . . . .
Nuclear Wa ste Disposal ..
Te chnol ogy Transitions .
Clean Energy Demonstrations .
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy .
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Climate .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11

final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

841 , 000
4,726 , 000
2 ,300 , 000

831 , 340
7,440,000

860,000
7,475 , 000+19,000+2 , 749,000-2 ,300,000+28 ,660+35 , 000

7,026 , 000

7,440 , 000

7 , 475,000+449, 000

+35,000

27,5007 , 500
19 , 470
400 , 000
500 , 000
200,000

27,50019,47020,000450,000+19,470+20, 000+23, 000

427,000+20,000-380,000-50,000-2 00,000

Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program :Guaranteed loan subsidy.

Administrative costs.
Offsetting co llections.
Rescission of emergency funding ........ .. .. .

Subtota I .

150 ,000
32,000-3 ,000

32,000- 3,000- 363,000

179,000

29,0005,000-1,908,000

5,000

5 , 000-1,903,000

5,000

5 , 000+1, 908,000

2,000
22,0002,000
122,000

2,000
58.000+36, 000

32,000-3 ,000-392,000-150,000+392,000+392,000-150,000

Vehicles Manufacturing Loan

Subtota l ....

Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program .
Indian Energy Pol icy and Programs .

+1, 908 , 000-64,000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELDPHENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022

(Amounts in thousands}
FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bill

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

259 , 378
-93,378

422 ,338-100,578

340 ,5 78-100,578+81 , 200
-7 , 200-81,760

Net appropriation.

166,000

321,760

240 , 000

+74,000-81,760

Office of the Inspector General .

57, 739

78 , 000

78,000+20,261

12,444,825

18 ,790,230

16 ,116,024+3,671, 199-2 ,674, 206

15,345,000
2,260,000

15 , 484,295
2,264,000-330,000

15,920,000
2,354 ,000

+575, 000
+94, 000+435, 705
+90 , 000
+330,000

2,260,000

1,934 , 000

2,354,000+94,000+420,000

1,684,000

1,866 , 705-6,0001,918 , 000+234 , 000+51 , 295
+6 , 000

1,860, 705

1 , 918 , 000+234 , 000+57 ,29 5

Departmental Administration.
Hi see 11 aneous revenues .

Total, Energy programs.
Atomic Energy Defense Activities

National Nuclear Security Administration
Weapon s Activities .
Defense Nuclear Non pro lifer at ion.

Rescis s ion.

Subtotal .
Naval Reactors .

-------------- -------------- ------- ---- ---Rescission ..... . . . .. .

Subtotal ................... .. . . .
Federal Sal ar 1es and Expenses .

Total, National Nuclear Security Administration .

-------------- -------------- ------ -- ---- -1,684 , 000
443 , 200

464,000

464,000+20 , 800

19 , 732,200

19 , 743,000

20,656,000+923, 800

•913,000ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022
(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
Request6. 426,000

6,841,670

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Bill

Final Billvs Request+284. 000
+573, 333
+65, 000-131. 670
•573, 333
-185 , 000

Environmental and Other Defense Activities

920 , 000

1 , 170,000

6,710,000
573.333
985,000

Total, Environmental and Other Defense Activities .

7,346 , 000

8,011,670

8 , 268,333+922. 333

+256 . 663

Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities .

27 .078, 200

27 , 754 , 670

28. 924,333+1,846, 133+1,169,663

7,246• 7,246

7, 184- 7, 184

7,184• 7, 184-62+62

47,540-37 , 140

48,324-37,924

48. 324-37,924+ 784

10. 400

10,400

10. 400

259. 126

285,237

285 . 237

Defense Environmental Cleanup.
Defense UED&D.
. ......... • . . . . . .

Other Defense Activities.

Power Marketing Administrations /1
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power
Admi ni strati on.
Offsetting collections.

Subtotal .

Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power
Administration . .

Offsetting collections.
Subtotal .

- 784Construction Rehabilitation, Operation and
Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration .

+26, 111

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022

(Amounts in thousands)

Offsetting collections.
Subtotal.
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.

Offsetting collections.
Subtotal.

Total, Power Marketing Administrations.
Federal Energy Regulatory Cammi ssi on

Salaries and expenses
Revenues applied . .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted-169, 754

-194,465-194,465-24,711

89,37290, 772

90, 772+1,400

5,776

5,808
-5, 5805,808-5, 580+32-32-5, 548
228

228

228

100,000

101,400

101,400+1, 400

404,350-404, 350

463,900-463, 900

466,426-466,426+62,076-62,076

Final Billvs Request+2, 526-2, 526

Subtotal.

General Provision - Department of Energy
Colorado River Basin Fund (sec.305(b)).

2,000+2, 000

2,000

Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Construction Project
99-D-143 Rescission.
Naval Reactors Rescission.

Total, General Provisions.

Total, title III, Department of Energy.

2,000

39,625,025

46,646,300- 282, 133-6, 000-282,133-6, 000- 282, 133-6, 000-286, 133

-288,133-286,133

44,855,624+5,230,599-1,790,676

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, ANO RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022
(Amounts in thousands)

Appropriations.

Rescissions.
Emergency appropriations.
Rescissions of emergency funding.

TITLE IVFY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bi 11

Final Bi 11

EnactedRequestFinal Billvs Enacted

vs Request(39,627,265)( -2, 240)
(2,300,000)(-2 , 300,000)(46,982.300)(-336,000)(45,143,757)
I - 288,133)(+5,516,492)(-285,893)( - 2 , 300 , 000)(+2,300,000)( -1 , 838,543)(+47,867)-------------- -------------- ---------------------------- --------------INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

Appalachian Regional Cammi ss ion.
Defense Nuclear Facn i ti es Safety Board.
Del ta Regional Authority.
Denali Commission ..
Northern Border Regional Commission.

Southeast Crescent Regional Cammi ss ion.
Southwest Border Regional Commission.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
Salaries and expenses.
Revenues.

180,000
31,00030,00015,00030,0001,000
250

235,000
31,00030,10015,10030,1002,500
2,500

195,000
36,00030,10015,10035,0005,000
2,500

830,900- 710,293

873.901-745,258• 7 45, 258

120,607

128,643

128,643+8, 036

13 , 499-11, 106

13 .799-11 ,442

13,799-11 , 442

+300
-336

873,901-------------- -------------- -------------Subtotal.
Office of Inspector General.

Revenues.
Subtotal .
Total , Nuclear Re9ul atory Commission.

··------------ -------------- -----·-------2,393

2 , 357

2,357

123,000

131 , 000

131,000-------------- -------------- ···-----------+15,000+5, 000+100+100+5,000+4,000+2,250-40, 000+5,000+4, 900+2, 500+43, 001-34, 965-------------- ---------------------------- -- -- ----- -- ---36-------------- -------------+B, 000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, ANO RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT,

2022

(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021

FY 2022

Final Bill

Final Bill

EnactedRequestFinal Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

Nuclear \.Ja ste Te c hnical Review Board ...... . . . , . .. . . .

3,600

3 , 800

3, BOO+200

Total . title IV, Independent agencies .

413,850481 . 100

453 ,500+39, 650-27,60 0

100,000
3. 000, 000
868 , ODO
887 , ODO
826. 000
30 .000+100.000+3, 000, 000+868, 000
+887 ,000+826, 000
+30, 000+100 , 000+3 , 000, 000+868 , 000+887, 000
+826, 000
+30, 000

5. 711,000+5 , 711 ,000

+5, 711 ,000

OTHER APPROPRIATIONSEXTENDING GOVERNMENT FUNDING AND DELIVERING EMERGENCYASSISTANCT ACT , 2021 (PL 117-43)
DIVISION B - DISASTER RELi EF SUPPLEMENTAL
APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2022
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Corps of Engineers - Civi 1

Investigations (emergency).
Construction (e mergency) .

Mississippi Rivers and Tributaries ( emergen cy).
Operation and Maintenance (emergency).
Flood Cont ro 1 and Coastal Erne rgenci es (emergency) .

Expenses (emergency).
Total . Corps of Engineers - Civil.

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT. 2022
(Amounts in thousands)
Final Bi 11

Final Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

vs Request

Central Utah Projec t Completion Account (emergency) .
Bureau of Reel amation

10,000+10 , 000

+10 . 000

Water and Related Resources {emergency) .

210,000+210 .000+210,000

Total , Department of the Interior .

220 , 000

+220,000+220 , 000

Strategic Petroleum Reserve(emergency) .

43 ,300+43,300+43 . 300

Tota 1. Department of Energy.

43,300+43 . 300

+43 , 300

5,974,300+5 , 974 , 300+5 , 974,300

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Central Utah Project

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Programs

Total, Extending Government Funding and
Delivering Emergency Assistance Act. 2021 .

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2022
(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11

Final Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

120,000
30,000+120, 000
+30, 000+120,000+30, 000

THE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT(P

L . 117-58)

DIVISION J - APPROPRIATIONSDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Corps of Engineers - Civil
Investigations (emergency).
Advance appropriations FY 2023 (emergency).
Total.
Construction (emergency).
Advance appropr i at i ans FY 2023 (emergency) .
Advance appropriations FY 2024 (emergency).

Total.

Mississippi River and Tributaries (emergency).
Oper at i ans and maintenance ( emergency) .

Advance appropriations FY 2023 (emergency) .
Advance appropriations FY 2024 (emergency) .
Tota l.

1so, 000-------------- -------------+150,000+ 1 so, 000+11 , 51 S, 000+50, 000+SO , 000

+11 ,515,000+50, 000+50, 000

11,615,000+11,615 ,000

+11 ,615,000

808,000+808 , 000+808,000

2.000,000
1 , 000 . 000
1 , 000,000+2 , 000,000+1 , 000 , 000+1,000 , 000+2,000,000+1 , 000,000+1,000,000

11,515,000
so, 000
50,0004,000,000-------------- ---------------------------- -------------+4,000,000+4, 000, 000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGE NCI ES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022

(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedRegulatory Program (emergency).
Flood control and coastal emergencies (emergency).
Expenses(emergency) .

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bi 11

Final Billvs Enacted

Final Bi 11
vs Request

160,000
251 , 000
40,000+160,000+251 , 000+40,000+160,000+251 , 000+40,000

75,000+75,000+75,000

17,099,000+17, 099, 000+17 ,099,000

50,000+50, 000+50, 000

1 , 660,000
1 , 660,000
1,660,000
1,660,000
1 , 660,000+1, 660,000+1,660,000+1,660,000+1,660,000+1,660,000+1, 660,000+1, 660,000+1 ,660, 000+1 , 660,000+1 ,660, 000

8,300,000+8, 300,000+8, 300,000

8,350,000+8, 350,000+8, 350,000

Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program
Account(emergency).

Total, Corps of Engineers - Civil
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Central Utah ProjectCentral Utah Project Completion Account (emergency).
Water and Related Resources (emergency).

Advance appropriations FY 2023 (emergency) .
Advance appropriations FY 2024 (emergency) .
Advance appropriations FY 2025 (emergency).
Advance appropriations FY 2026 (emergency)

Total,

Total, Department of the Interior.

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT , 2022

(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bill

Final Billvs Enacted

vs Request

8 ,207 ,200
2.221.800
1 , 945,000
1 ,945, 000
1 , 945,000+8, 207,200+2, 221,800+1,945 , 000+1,945,000+ 1 . 945,000+8 , 207 .200
+2 . 221,800+1 , 945,000+1 ,945,000+1 , 945 . 000

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Ene rgy Programs
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (emergency)
Advance appropriations FY 2023 (emergency} . .
Advance appropriations FY 2024 (emergency) .
Advance appropriations FY 2025 (emergency) .

Advance appropriations FY 2026 (emergency).
Total .

-------------- ------ ----- -- - -- ---- ---------------------- --------------

16,264.000+16, 264,000+ 16,264.000

150,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000+150, 000
+100, 000
+100,000+100,000+100,000+150,000+100,000+100, 000
+100, 000
+100,000

Cybersecurity, Energy Security, and Emergency Response(emergency).
Advance appropriations
Advance appropriations
Advance appropriations
Advance appropri a t i ans

FY 2023 (emergency).
FY 2024 (emergency),
FY 2025 (emergency).

FY 2026 (emergency) .

Total ..
Electricity (emergency).
Advance appropriations FY 2023
Advance appropriations FY 2024
Advance appropriations FY 2025
Advance appropriations FY 2026

(emergency).
(emergency) .
(emergency).
(emergency)------- ------- -------------- ···-- ---------+ 550,000+550,000

1 , 660.000
1 , 610,000
1 ,6 10,000
1 , 610,000
1,610,000+1, 660,000+1,610,000+1,610 , 000+1 , 610 , 000+1,610 ,000

+1 . 660. 000+1 .6 10.000+1 ,6 10,000+1 , 610 ,000
+1 , 610,000· ····- · -·····- ------········ ····- ·-- -----Total .

-------------- --------------

550,000

8,100,000-·-··········· ··········-···+8, 100,000+8, 100 ,000

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022

(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021
EnactedNuclear Energy (emergency).
Advance appropriations FY
Advance appropri at i ans FY
Advance appropri at i ans FY
Advance appropri at i ans FY

2023
2024
2025
2026

FY 2022
Request(emergency) .
(emergency) .
(emergency)(emergency) .

-------------- -------------Total .

Fossi 1 Energy and Carbon Management (emergency).
Advance appropri at i ans FY 2023 (emergency).
Advance appropri at i ans FY 2024 (emergency) .
Advance appropri at i ans FY 2025 (emergency) .
Advance appropri at i ans FY 2026 (emergency) .

Total .

Final Bill
Final Billvs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

1,200,000
1,200,000
1,200,000
1 , 200,000
1 , 200,000+1,200,000+1 , 200,000+1 , 200,000+1,200,000+1, 200,000+1 , 200,000+1, 200,000+1, 200,000+1 , 200,000+1, 200,000---------------------------- --------------

6,000,000+6, 000, 000+6,000,000

1 , 839,000
1,444,450
1,446,962
1,449,541
1,317,188+1, 839,000+1,444,450+ 1 , 446,962+1,449,541+1,317,188+1, 839,000+1 , 444,450+1 , 446,962+1 , 449,541+1,317, 188-------------- -------------- ---------------------------- --------------

7,497,141+7,497,141+7 ,497, 141

3,000
2,097,000
500,000+3,000+2, 097, 000+500, 000

+3, 000+2, 097, 000+500, 000

2,600,000+2, 600,000+2, 600,000

5,127,250
4,426,250
4,476,250
4,526,250+5, 127,250+4, 426,250+4,476,250+4, 526,250+5,127,250+4, 426,250+4, 476,250+4, 526,250

Carbon Dioxide Transportation Infrastructure Financeand Innovation Program Account (emergency).
Advance appropriations FY 2023 (emergency).
Additional costs, FY 2023 ( Sec 40304) (emergency)

Total.
Office of Clean Energy
Advance appropri at
Advance appropriat
Advance appropriat

Demon strati ons (emergency).
ons FY 2023 (emergency).
ons FY 2024 (emergency).
ons FY 2025 (emergency).

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022
(Amounts in th ousa nds }FY 2021
EnactedAdvance appropri at 1 ans FY 2026 ( emergency) .
Total .

Total . Energy Programs .

FY 2022
RequestFinal Bill

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Billvs Request

2,900,000+2, 900,000+2,900,000

21 , 456 , 000+21 , 456 , 000+21 , 456,000

62,467,141+62,467,141+62 ,467, 141

500 , 000
- 60,000+500 , 000-60,000+500 , 000-60,000

Power Marketing Administration
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and
Mainte nance, Western Area Power Administration( emergency ).
Offsetting collections ( FY 2025-2026)(emergency )General Provisions
DOE IG (Sec303)

(by transfer).

Total , Department of Energy.

(18,000)-------------- ·· ·· ---------- ---- ----------(+18,000)(+18,000)-------------- --------------

62 ,90 7, 141+62, 907, 141+62,907,141

200,000
200 ,000
200,000
200,000+200, 000
+200 , 000+200, 000
+200, 000

+200 , 000+200, 000
+200, 000
+200 , 000

INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
Appalachian
Advance
Advance
Advance

Regional Commission (emergency).
appropr i at i ans FY 2023 (emergency) .
appropri at i ans FY 2024 (emergency) .
appropriations FY 2025 (emergency) .

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT. 2022
(Amounts in thousands)

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022
RequestFin al Bi 11

Final Bi 11

Final Bi 11

vs Enacted

vs Request

Advance appropriations FY 2026 (emergency).

200,000+200, 000

+200, 000

Total , Appalachian Regional Commission.

1 , 000,000+1,000 , 000+1 , DOD, 000

150 , 000
75 , 000
150 , 000
5 , 000
1 , 250+150 , 000+75,000+150 , 000+5,000+1, 250+150 . 000+75,000+150,000+5,000+1 , 250

Total, Independent Agencies.

1,381,250+1,381,250+1,381.250

Total, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.

89,737,391+89, 737,391+89, 737,391

Total, Other Appropriations.

95,711,691+95 ,711, 691+95,711,691

Delta Regional Au t hority (emergency) .

Denali Commission (emergency).
Northern Border Regional Commission (emergency) ..
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission (emergency) .
Southwest Border Regional Commission (emergency) .

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2022
(Amounts in thousand s)

Grand total .

Appropriation s.
Emergency appropriations .
Emergency advance appropriations.
Rescissions .
Rescissions of emergency funding .

FY 2021
EnactedFY 2022Requ est

49 . 524. 875(49,527,615)(2,300.000)

55,472,849(55,808,849)( -2 . 740)
( - 2 ,300,000)(-336,000)

Emergen cy offsetting collections (FY2025-2026) ...

Grand total less emergencies.
1/

Total s adjusted to net out alternati ve financing
costs , reimbursable agreement funding, and powerpurchase and wh ee ling expenditures. Offsetting

co ll ection totals only reflect funds collected
for annual ex pense s, excluding power purc ha sewheeling

49,524,875

55 , 472,849

Final Billvs Ena cted

Final Bill

+95,814 , 966(+55,408)(+4 1 , 921,000)(+53,850,691)(+47 ,867)( -60 ,000)•101,762 ,940(+6,336,642)( + 39 , 621 , 000)
( +53,850 ,69 1 )( -285 , 393)(+2. 300,000)(-60,000)

55,576 , 124+6,051,249+103,275

Final Bi 11151, 287,8 15(55,864,257)(41,921 , 000)
(53,850,691)( - 288, 133)

vs Request( -60 , 000)

ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT , AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATION S ACT , 2022

(Amounts in thousands)
FY 2021

FY 2022

EnactedRequestFinal Bill

7,795 , 000

6,792 , 500

1 ,691 , 000

1,552 ,949

39,625 , 025
413,650

Final Bi 11
vs Enacted

Final Bi 11
vs Request

6 , 343,000+546 , 000+1 , 550, 500

1 ,924 , 000+233,000+371 , 051

46,646 ,300

44,655 , 624+5 ,230,599- 1 .790,676

461 , 100

453,500+39, 650-27 ,600DISCRETIONARY RECAP BY TITLE
Tit le I ,Department of Defense

Tit le II ,Department of the Interior .

Civi 1 .

Tit le III , Depa rtment of Energy . . . . . . . . . . .
Tit le IV ,Ind epe ndent Agencies .

Subtotal .
Scorekeeping adjustments .

Total ... ........ .. .. .. .... .

.. .

--- ----------- -------------- ---------------------------- ---- -- --------

49,524,675

55,472 , 649

55,576 , 124+6 , 051 , 249+103 , 275-72,675-1,646 , 025- 2, 704,124-2,631 , 249-656,099-------------- ---- --- ------- -------------49 , 452 , 000

53 , 624,624

52,672,000-------------- --- --- -------+3,420,000-752, 624