Kagoshima University Research Center for the Pacific Islands Occasional Papers No.39, 87-91, 2003
Section 3, Report 1. The Progress Report of the 2000 and 2001 Survey of the Research Project“Social Homeostasis of Small Islands in an Island-zone”

87

AN OVERVIEW OF AROID CULTIVATION ON ATOLLSIN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
NAKANO Kazutaka1) and ONJO Michio 2)

Abstract
In Ulithi Atoll, we conducted a field survey. The information we were able to obtain may be useful for developing the discussion of aroid production on low islands to the general level. The methodof cultivation on Mogmog Islet is not exceptional and is typical of pit cultivation. In this survey, weconfirmed the cultivation of Colocasia, Cyrtosperma and Alocasia or Xanthosoma.
Keywords: aroid cultivation, atoll, Mogmog Islet, Ulithi Atoll

Particular Reference to Mogmog Islet in Ulithi Atoll
An overview of the islands in tropical Oceania requires no quantitative description of particular cases in order to understand the importance of aroids (taro and other botanically related
food plants) to foodstuff production in the past. However, comparative studies of aroid cultivation and other related aspects demonstrate a broad diversity in differing natural and socioculturalenvironments. In this regard, it is convenient to classify islands into “high islands” and “lowislands”. The method of aroid production on atolls characterized by extremely low elevation contrasts markedly to that of the high islands.
Since Mogmog Islet in Ulithi Atoll, where we conducted a field survey, is one of the islets
composing a typical atoll, the information we were able to obtain there may be useful for developing the discussion of aroid production on low islands to the general level. The most importantnatural factors in the atoll environment which relate to agriculture or horticulture are the limited
availability of freshwater and the extremely calcareous soil. Mogmog Islet is located in the tropical oceanic region where the temperature of the sea surface is the highest in the world, and partly
because of this, it very rarely undergoes severe drought. Nevertheless, because the coral reef
composing the geologically upper layer of the atoll is highly porous and allows the seawater tocontinuously infiltrate, freshwater is not ubiquitously available. As is well known, freshwater accumulates only in a limited underground area in the shape of a lens, on account of its lower specific gravity than that of seawater. Accordingly, the aroids which cannot tolerate water with highsalinity can grow only within a limited area, unless some artificial facilities are used.
Furthermore, the fertility of highly calcareous soil is generally low. Such soil rapidly consumes
organic matter, so continued cultivation in these areas requires continual inputs of organic matter(B ARRAU 1961).
The general features of the cultivation of aroids on the Pacific atolls are described inBARRAU (1961). The method of cultivation on Mogmog Islet is not exceptional and exemplifies
1)
2)

Present address: 2–703, 1–3 Otsukadai-nishi 2-chome, Miyazaki 880-2105, Japan.
Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University. Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan.

88

NAKANO Kazutaka and ONJO Michio

the category of pit cultivation. As a rule, a piece of land intended for aroid production is planted
and cultivated without fallow. A great quantity of organic matter is added from the surroundingarea, both for mulching and for maintaining soil fertility. The sporadic growth (though perhapsspontaneous) of Vigna marina (Leguminosae) (M ANNER 1989–1990) also seems to contribute
somewhat toward maintaining soil fertility. This type of cultivation is very “intensive”. Asshown in M ANNER (1989–1990), the predominant aroid produced on Mogmog is giant swamp
taro (Cyrtosperuma chamissonis) which “has a higher tolerance of salinity” (F ALANRUW 1995).
The islanders usually dig out the tubers of these plants after one year from planting.
The growth rate of the Mogmog tubers seems to be markedly higher than those on the YapIslands, where the main crop is also the identical species of aroids (FALANRUW 1994). Although
the actual measurement was for only one sample, the weight of a tuber with epidermis dug out
after one full year from planting was 920 g. In reference to the estimated growth rate on the Yap
Islands, under the assumption that tubers simply increase in arithmetic progression (in fact, thegrowth weight for the first year is considered to be less than the estimate with this assumption),
their weight with their epidermis after one full year from planting is calculated to be approximately 500 g using the estimate based on the samples collected by NAKANO (2001). This difference in the initial growth rates is obviously considered to be closely correlated with the greatquantity of organic matter added to the taro patch on Mogmog. On the Yap Islands, taro patchesof giant swamp taro seem to receive less intensive management after they have been developed(F ALANRUW 1995), though of course, some organic matter is also applied there (VARGO 1989
–1990). As M ANNER (1989–1990) states, usually only women are allowed into the taro patch(pit) of Mogmog Islet. Some of the old men complained that, “Nowadays, women don’t work atall.” The fact that we saw some patches completely covered with weeds at the central area of thetaro pit possibly supports such a complaint, although we often heard the more general comment,“Everybody worked hard in olden days,” which is a typical comment anywhere in the world.
The overall population density of Mogmog Islet is estimated to be 770/km2 because the total2
area of Mogmog Islet is 0.22 km (the estimate planimetrically measured based on the map in
U SHIJIMA (1982) using Planimex 25 manufactured by Nihon Regulator Co.) and its total population is estimated to be 170 based on the latest data obtained from an officer in charge of thestatistics of Yap State in 2001. This population density can be regarded as high when we exclude
urban areas. Throughout the late phase of the Pacific War, Ulithi Atoll was almost entirely usedby the U. S. Navy as an anchorage and supply base. Military construction destroyed the taro pits
on all main islets except Mogmog, and the taro pits did not recover after the war. However,Mogmog suffered less damage than the other islets (M ANNER 1989–1990), and taro production
on Mogmog has continued until the present time as described above. A great quantity of munitions were reportedly dumped into the taro pit on Mogmog, but the islanders made strenuous
efforts to remove them after the war. Based on the map in U SHIJIMA (1982), the area of the taro
pit was planimetrically estimated to be approximately 1.4 ha. However, the islanders reported
that they had continued to enlarge its area little by little. If so, its present area might be slightly
larger than the estimated size. Calculating the mean per capita area of taro pit (acknowledging
the possibility of the slight underestimate due to the foregoing circumstances) yields a result of2
82 m /person. From this we may conclude that the taro pit cannot support the islet population iftaro is the predominant staple, even with the initial robust growth of the taro tubers. According
to M ANNER (1989–1990), the islanders consume larger quantities of breadfruit than taro. Since
1997, Mogomog women have begun cultivating banana, cassava, and some other crops on theAN OVERVIEW OF AROID CULTIVATION ON ATOLLS IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN

89

two adjacent uninhabited islets and this has further reduced dependency on taro. Also, the islanders consume a great quantity of imported rice and foods made from wheat flour. Although thequantitative importance of taro as staple foodstuff is limited, reportedly taro still retains cardinal
importance on traditionall occasions. This seems to be a major factor motivating the continuationof taro pit cultivation.
This situation of high population density combined with very intensive agriculture or horticulture, may appear to support BOSERUP’s (1965) model in which population pressure is the engine driving intensification of agricultural systems. However, a Boserupian should not draw aconclusion too hastily from this case. LEACH (1999) and nine discussants who commented on thepaper, examined the applicability of Boserup’s model to tropical Oceanic islands and NewZealand. It appears that the archaeological surveys which have provided the material for investigating oceanic agricultural evolution have been conducted mainly on the high islands. In truth,
no surveys on atolls were mentioned in the discussion between Leach and the nine commentators. Of the ten writers, including Leach herself, a few, such as P. C. Kirch, emphasize evidence
that swidden agriculture was widely practiced during early stages of colonization on islands
where more intensive methods developed later. Certainly, in the cases of high islands, it is notdifficult to imagine a diachronic process in line with Boserup’s model: a shift from swidden tomore intensive systems of agriculture, with population growth following initial colonization of
the island. On the other hand, it seems reasonable to surmise that islanders may have had toadopt intensive systems of aroid cultivation very shortly after initial colonization, because of thetwo factors stated above, namely, the limited availability of freshwater that reduced the area
utilizable for production from the outset, and, that the poor soil conditions forced them to add agreat quantity of organic matter. Also, when we consider that the early settlers who colonized
new island environments were already familiar with intensive cultivation techniques in their
homeland, the preceding argument gains strength. In other words, disintensification appears lesslikely to have occurred in atoll environments. Such a view underlies B AYLISS-S MITH’s (1974,p. 273) comment, based on his survey in Ontong Java Atoll, “The Boserup model may be applicable as a long-term generalization for continental areas, but in the case of island populations
there are extremely acute restrictions on resource availability and innovation diffusion.” In addition, it relates closely to the point emphasized in BROOKFIELD’s (1972) discussion that onMogmog at present, taro is particularly significant for its sociocultural role as well as, or ratherthan, its actual role as a staple foodstuff.

Examples of Aroid Cultivation on Ulithi Atoll
In 1999, the authors investigated aroid cultivation in Yap Proper. The main species cultivated in Yap Proper was the giant swamp taro, Cyrtosperma chamissonia.
We also surveyed aroid cultivation on Ulithi Atoll in 2001, so we will report the results inthis section.
In Ulithi atoll, the giant swamp taro is cultivated by constructing ordinary taro patches on
only two of the four inhabited islands (Mogmog and Falalop) due to restrictions such as limited
cultivation area as compared with Yap Proper and limited water supply. In the three islands otherthan Falalop Islet (Mogmog, Asor, and Fassarai Islets), three to seven artificial concrete taro
patches per island are constructed. Each of these patches has an 18 m-long 3 m-wide on averageouter frame (on average) constructed by piling up concrete blocks to a height of 60 cm for
cultivating the aroids. Because there is little soil, leaves including coconut palm, breadfruit, and90

NAKANO Kazutaka and ONJO Michiobanana, are thrown into the frames, and cultivation begins one year later (depending on conditions) after this organic matter becomes humus and then soil. On Mogmog Islet, the patches wereinitially constructed to propagate favorable strains introduced from Yap Proper or for testing theadaptability to agriculture, but they are currently used simply as cultivation fields. At present, introduction has been suspended because it is highly probable that the giant swamp taro in YapProper is suffering from diseases (SAKAMAKI et al. 2001). It is difficult to construct ordinary taro
patches in the Asor and Fassarai Islets, so concrete taro patches were constructed instead. Theseconcrete taro patches may be unique and an appropriate method for cultivating the giant swamp
taro that prefers a swamp in islands such as these that lack water and rich soil. If we consider
the size of the island and its population, the giant swamp still taro plays an indispensable role infood supply in spite of their small sizes. Furthermore, rules have been established for cultivating
genuine taro patches, but fewer rules have been established for cultivation in concrete taropatches. It is also interesting that these concrete taro patches are not owned by individuals but
are cultivated under joint management by the community. This form of cultivation may be related to the fact that taro, particularly Cyrtosperma, is a very significant crop because it has traditionally been used for special events as described above.
There are five genera of edible aroid: Alocasia, Amorphophallus, Colocasia, Cyrtosperma,and Xanthosoma. Of these, all but Amorphophallus are also cultivated on Ulithi Atoll (M ERLINet al. 1996). During this survey, we successfully confirmed the cultivation of Colocasia andCyrtosperma. However, it is difficult to distinguish Alocasia and Xanthosoma only from the appearance of their blades and petiols, so we did not discriminate these two genera during this survey.
On Asor and Fassarai Islets, Cyrtosperma and Colocasia were cultivated in a single concrete taro patch together with Alocasia or Xanthosoma.
However, we observed Alocasia or Xanthosoma, which has relatively high drought resistance, being cultivated in various areas of Falalop Islet. Though these genera are also cultivatedon the Mogmog, Asor, and Fassarai Islets, the volume of cultivation was considerably larger on
Falalop Islet.
We consider that further studies are required to investigate whether this is due to humanfactors, such as the population level or taste, or natural environments such as the adaptability tothe soils.

References
BARRAU, J. 1961. Subsistence agriculture in Polynesia and Micronesia. Bernice P. Bishop
Museum Bulletin 223. Honolulu, Hawaii: Bernice P. Bishop Museum. 2+94 pp.
BAYLISS-SMITH, T. 1974. Constraints on population growth: The case of the Polynesian outlier
atolls in the precontact period. Human Ecology 2: 259–295.
BOSERUP, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change
under population pressure. London: George Allen & Unwin. 124 pp.
BROOKFIELD, H. C. 1972. Intensification and disintensification in Pacific agriculture: A theoretical approach. Pacific Viewpoint 13: 30–48.
FALANRUW, M. V. C. 1994. Food production and ecosystem management on Yap. Isla: A
Journal of Micronesian Studies 2: 5–22.
———. 1995. The Yapese Agricultural System. Doctoral Dissertation, the University of theSouth Pacific. 15+386 pp.

AN OVERVIEW OF AROID CULTIVATION ON ATOLLS IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN

91

LEACH, H. M. 1999. Intensification in the Pacific: A critique of the archaelogical criteria andtheir application. Current Anthropology 40: 311–339.
M ANNER , H. I. 1989–1990. “Ulithi.” A rapid rural appraisal of taro production systems inMicronesia, Hawai‘i and American Samoa: Surveys conducted in conjunction with theproject. In A comparative study of low-input and high-input taro production systems in theAmerican Pacific, with special reference to pest control, compiled by A. VARGO and L.
FERENTINOS, 145–153. Honolulu, Hawai‘i: Pacific Agriculture Development Office,
University of Hawai‘i.
M ERLIN, M., A. K UFAS, T. KEENE, and J. JUVIK. 1996. Plants, People and Ecology in Yap.
Honolulu: East-West Center. 5+131 pp.
N AKANO, K. 2001. The supply of energy-source foodstuffs in the Yap Islands: A preliminary
report. Kagoshima University Research Center for the Pacific Islands Occasional Papers
34: 95–100.
SAKAMAKI, S., ONJO M., and T AURA S. 2001. Sustaining agriculture production in Yap: Anassessment of pest insects and plant disease. Kagoshima University Research Center for thePacific Islands Occasional Papers 34: 95–100.
U SHIJIMA, I. 1982. The control of reefs and lagoons: Some aspects of the political structure ofUlithi Atoll. In Islanders and their outside world, ed. by A OYAGI M., 35–75. Tokyo:
Committee for Micronesian Research, St. Paul’s (Rikkyo) University.
V ARGO, A. 1989-1990. “Summary and conclusion.” A rapid rural appraisal of taro production
systems in Mcronesia, Hawai‘i and American Samoa: Surveys conducted in conjunction
with the project. In A comparative study of low-input and high-input taro production systems in the American Pacific, with special reference to pest control, compiled by A. V ARGO
and L. FERENTINOS, 161–166. Honolulu, Hawai‘i: Pacific Agriculture Development Office,University of Hawai‘i.