The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia
Karim Sadeghi
Urmia University
Jack C Richards
University of Sydney
Abstract
This paper explores the place of English in Iran. To do this, we look at the social presence of English in
Urmia (the capital of West Azerbaijan province, Iran). The paper draws on instances of the use of English
in different contexts in Urmia, including its use in academia, business, state and private education, media,
and people’s ordinary lives. The idea of English in Iran is also investigated by studying a cohort of 115
English language learners’ motivations toward learning English as well as their attitudes toward the language. The results suggest that English has an active status in Urmia, alongside Turkish, Persian andKurdish, and is regarded as an important international language among Iranians living in Urmia as well as
one that accrues a number of social benefits to its users.

Introduction

First-time visitors to Iran are often pleasantly surprised by a reality that may not match their expectations. Iranians they encounter are generally friendly and hospitable and enjoy meeting andinteracting with foreign visitors. They are proud to share information about Iranian history, culture and customs with visitors and many are fluent speakers of English or are interested in practicing their English with visitors. As a TV celebrity chef, Anthony Bourdain recently tweeted
after a visit to Iran: “Never would have guessed that of all countries in world, my crew and I
would be treated so well everywhere, by total strangers in Iran” (New York Times, June 24,2014). And in almost every part of Iran there is a growing interest in learning English, a proliferation of private language institutes teaching English as well as an extensive English language
teaching profession which supports a variety of professional activities for English language
teachers, including professional journals and magazines, workshops and national and international conferences. English appears to have achieved this status in Iran despite its somewhat ambivalent official status. At the time of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, English was described asa ‘foreign’ language and given the official status of 'alien' language, reflecting the attitude at the1time towards the language spoken by Iran’s perceived enemies such as the USA and the UK.
Since then English has come to be viewed differently, a change of attitude prompted by a famous
quotation of Iran's late leader (Imam Khomeini, PBUH) whose opinion of foreign languages in
Iran appears on the opening pages of all school-level English books in Iran:
Earlier there was no need for foreign languages. Today, there is a need, however. The world's
living languages should be included in the syllabi of schools…. Today is not like yesterday
when we couldn't have our voice heard by others in other parts of the world. Today we can remain in Iran and promote ourselves in other parts of the world using another language. (originaltext in Persian)

As the world’s international language, English now features prominently in Iran's official education curriculum and even more so in the private education sector. Knowing English is now considered a marker of educational as well as social achievement. This paper seeks to clarify the status of English in Iran, both by examining the different functions it performs in contemporary Iranian society as well as by attempting to characterize its symbolic role – that is, the “idea” of English that its use reflects (Seargeant, 2009).Thus we seek to clarify the following questions:
1. What is the status of English as reflected in language policy and societal practices?
2. For what reasons do people study English?
3. What purposes does English serve for them?
4. What values do they attribute to the use of English and to the learning of English?
5. How is English conceptualized as an international language in Iran?
6. How is this conceptualization reflected in its use in Iran?
7. What costs and benefits result from the status of English in Iran?

To do this, we will examine the role of English in the city of Urmia (formerly known as Rezaeyieh and Chichest), a city of 1,265,721 residents (based on 2012 census), the capital city of West
Azerbaijan Province in Northwest Iran. Urmia is the 10th most populated city in Iran. The population is mostly made of Azeris (also called Turkish), together with a sizeable numberof Kurds, a minority of Assyrians, Christians, and Armenians. The city lies at an altitude of
1,330 m above sea level on the Shahar Chay River (City River). Urmia is situated on a fertile2

plain called Urmia Plain on the western side of Lake Urmia and is separated from the Turkish border by a small range of mountains (Wikipedia online).

Official status of English in IranIn formulating language policy towards the teaching of English in a country, a variety of options
are available to educational planners. For example, English could be positioned as the languageof English-speaking countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, the United States and Australia and be linked to the cultures of those and other English-speaking countries. Another option
would be to emphasize its role as an international language and as a means of communication
with the world beyond a country’s borders. A different function for English would be to position
it as a tool for providing access to information needed for technical, scientific and economic development within a country, i.e., as a form of economic capital.
In Iran, English serves primarily the second and third functions above (Kiany, Mahdavy, & Ghafar
Samar, 2011), and particularly as a means of having access to information. In the public sector

including schools and universities, English is regarded as a tool providing access to newknowledge and technology, hence there is an emphasis on reading comprehension. Those studying English in private institutes do so for a variety of reasons but often to develop functional
communication skills (see below) and to pass international tests. The need to learn English is explained in the following way in 'A Word with the Students' in English Book 1 (Birjandi et al.,1994)for middle school students (the stage at which English is formally introduced to public education):
The importance of learning English is not hidden for anyone. Those who wish to enter university
and continue their education to the highest level, those who would like to find a good job in thesociety, those who would like to do research, those who wish to use computer and the Internet, allthese groups have no other option than learning English to the highest level. In short, everybody
needs to learn the Language (English) in the 21st century. (original text in Persian)English in public education

3

In the current system of education (in effect since 2013), primary education lasts for six years and Middle
and High schools for three years each. In the official curriculum of public education, English is listed as
one of the required courses for middle and high school levels (http://www.talif.sch.ir). According to Ataiand Mazlum (2013), policy-making in the current ELT curriculum in Iran is highly centralized, with nolocal policy-makers involved. English is formally introduced at the first year of middle school (also called
Secondary School Round 1). In the older system of education which came into effect after the Islamic
Revolution in 1979, English was introduced in year 2 of Middle School (Ghorbani, 2009). Students in
Middle and High schools take between two and four hours of English instruction each week with different
syllabi for different years, which are revised from time to time. The syllabus and course content are prescribed for all schools, and teachers are not able to make changes to course content or structure. The current ‘revised’ syllabus used in public education aims to move beyond a focus on reading skills and to develop basic English proficiency; however, the course materials at Middle School primarily address alphabet recognition, pronunciation and limited vocabulary instruction, while those used at High School
continue to focus on reading comprehension, grammar, and vocabulary development, with little emphasis
on writing beyond decontextualized sentence practice. Listening is almost absent in the syllabus, andspeaking is limited to a few drills (mainly intended to practice grammar) and short dialogues to introduce
language functions. Consequently after six years of formal English instruction, unless students have taken
additional courses in a private institute (in larger cities a common choice for students from well-off families), they normally have minimal communication skills in English.
Formal English instruction also continues at tertiary education. (Other required general courses include
topics such as Persian Language and Literature, Theology, Life Lessons). Unlike pre-university education, there is no fixed syllabus for teaching English at university and instructors are able to develop theirown syllabus and to choose relevant teaching materials. SAMT (the organization in charge of overseeing
and producing educational materials for universities in Iran) has produced a few books for English at tertiary level but there is a very limited choice. Some instructors choose books published outside of Iran.
Typically English courses at university focus on written English and emphasize grammar, vocabulary andreading comprehension, with little or virtually no attention paid to spoken English and oral communication. Classes are conducted in Farsi both at pre-university and university levels. However few students inthese courses are seriously committed to learning English since they do not see it as relevant to their fieldsof study. In addition the English course is typically only of 20 to 30 hours duration, often not taught bystaff from an English department and consequently students gain little from it.
The school textbooks

4

The English textbooks used in public education are written by a team of authors affiliated with the Ministry of Education, with no other alternatives available (Dahmardeh, 2009. The first level English book for
middle school introduces the letters and sounds of the English alphabet, and a basic set of vocabulary
items together with short dialogues. With level 2, further vocabulary and dialogues are introduced as well
as reading comprehension texts and writing exercises. At higher levels, the school textbooks containlonger reading passages accompanied by detailed comprehension and vocabulary exercises as well as
grammar practice. However, there is little focus on oral communication skills.
Periodically minor changes have been made to the content and structure of the English textbooks used inschools during the last 30 years. According to one of the authors of English book 1 for middle school(English for Students: Prospect 1 (Khedir Sharabian et al, 2013) ), no major changes were made to thecontent of school books for 27 years (interview with authors Seyed Behnam Alavi Moghaddam, available
at the official website of Curriculum Development Center: http://eng-dept.talif.sch.ir/). However, more
recently, major changes to English textbooks are planned in order to focus on “active meaning-oriented
communication” (English for Schools, Prospect 1: Teacher's guide). One consequence of this new plan
will be to give attention to mastery of the language skills and to communicative abilities. However while
it is recommended that English classes be conducted in English, due to the learners’ (and sometimes theteachers’) limited English proficiency, classes are typically conducted in the students’ mother tongue (e.g.
Farsi, Turkish or Kurdish). Consequently, a translation and grammar-based approach to teaching is thenorm, reinforced by the nature of the assessment system that tests linguistic knowledge rather than communicative ability. Mixed-level classes resulting from the fact that some learners may be taking additional
English classes in private institutes can also make the teaching and learning of English problematic andfrustrating for both teachers and students. Parents too sometimes complain about their children’s failure tolearn English in public schools.
English as a specialization in Higher Education
In most universities in Iran, including the five universities located in Urmia, English is also offered as a
subject that students can major in. Currently in Iran, some 29 state and 35 distance education universities
offer an English program for the 2013-2014 academic year in either English Language and Literature,
English Language Teaching, or English Translation at BA level (www.sanjesh.org). In addition to state
universities, many more private (Open) universities offer English as a major field of study. There are also
numerous MA and PhD programs offering a specialization in English. For the Fall 2014 semester, forinstance, Iran’s state universities are scheduled to admit more than 100 candidates as PhD students in
TEFL (www.sanjesh.org). There is a strong competition among candidates to enter PhD programs. For
the 2014-2015academic year, for example, 99 candidates were invited to be interviewed for 14 vacant5

positions at Urmia University. For English majors, all course assignment and projects are completed in
English. Teachers in these programs are invariably Iranian nationals, many with qualifications obtained
abroad.
English in academia
Increasingly, academics in Iran are expected to be able to communicate in English, depending on theirdiscipline. Publication in English in international journals is encouraged. For some scholars this means
preparing articles in Farsi and having them translated into English or having papers written in English
proof-read and corrected by more proficient English teachers or post-graduate students. Private companies and individuals offer such translation and editing services in larger cities. There are a growing number of English-language publications (mainly scientific journals and a limited number of newspapers or
general magazines) in Iran covering different subjects. For example, Urmia University publishes two periodicals in English, one on Veterinary Sciences and the other on Language Teaching. English is also thelanguage of numerous academic gatherings and conferences at local, regional, and national levels, as wellas international conferences in English-related fields organized by different state and open universities aswell as by private organizations and language centers.

Private institutes
In order to develop practical skills in English, many young people take courses in private institutes. In
Urmia, there are over 60 registered language schools offering English conversation courses at different
levels for various age ranges. In addition, there are numerous unregistered language courses throughout
Urmia offering courses in general English, business English, ESP classes as well as preparation courses
for international tests such as IELTS and TOEFL. Institutes vary in size, ranging from those with 50 students tothose with more than 2000.Enrollment in these schools typically doubles during the summer
months. Textbooks used in institutes are often locally-printed but unauthorized versions of popular international courses such as Headway or Interchange. In addition to studying English at institutes, some parents employ private tutors to teach their children at home.
In some parts of the world such as Japan, English is promoted as an asset that facilitates international
travel, as a commodity that can lead to greater wealth, better employment prospects, and prestige, as well
as a language that is linked to being “cool” and modern (Seargeant, 2009; Kogar, 2014). The idea of English being cool and modern is perhaps reflected in the images used in the following advertisements forEnglish courses in Urmia:

6Better-known institutes in Urmia typically place such ads on billboards in areas where residents enjoy ahigher socio-economic status. Institutes also advertise in local business-oriented newspapers and magazines as well as on their own websites. Rather than marketing their courses though stressing the affordances knowledge of English can bring, institutes may refer to the quality of their facilities (for example, technological support, well qualified teachers, etc.), the number of branches the institute has, as wellas their use of widely recognized EFL textbook series such as Top Notch, Headway or Interchange. The
contents of almost all ads are exclusively in Persian except for the name of the institute and the title of thecourses they offer.

7

Organizations and businesses
While English is not used for oral or written communication in private or public organizations, most private organizations (and increasingly public ones as well) tend to recruit staff with some proficiency inEnglish. Knowledge of English, together with computer literacy, is considered essential for employment(especially for secretaries) in almost all private institutes. Academic staff in most private and state universities are expected to have a certain level of English proficiency (assessed according to TOEFL/IELTS or
localized versions of these proficiency tests). There are also a limited number of export companies in Urmia (involved in exporting cement, steel, fruit concentrate, etc.) which use written English for communication, however most communication takes place in Turkish as their main customers are in Turkey. A
few central banks also use English for communication with their international counterparts, although thishas been less common since the imposition of international economic sanctions on Iran since 5 years ago.
From time to time prestigious (international) companies and language centres publish their job an-

nouncements in English, although this is not very common.

English in the public domain
English has a public presence in Urmia as reflected in shop names, advertisements, street signs,
public messages and so on. One use of English is represented in words or phrases in English(sometimes misspelt) in public signs and messages, often appearing below the Persian word orphrase. This is common in shop windows, entrances to offices and organizations (mainly private), street names, traffic/address signs, parks, and hotels.

8While providing information for visitors who do not understand Persian, use of English in thesesituations also carries an additional symbolic meaning conveying attributes of prestige and status. English (along with Farsi) is also found on almost every domestic product such as dairy
products, electric devices, food and household items, although there are many other imported
foreign products (especially housing appliances and medication) which carry an English label
only (or English along with another foreign language). People who have not received any exposure to English or any foreign language written in Latin script such as German, French and Turkish, generally assume such words are “English”. Young people are often seen wearing clothing
items with English words or phrases printed on them, which is perhaps seen as “cool”. They may
not be aware of what the words mean or that the meaning may sometimes be offensive to religiously inclined people. Its use by young people may even serve to mark a distinct and different
identity from people with more traditional values.

Another impact of English is seen in the use of letters from the English alphabet to express Persian words. This is sometimes seen in shop names where only the English ‘script’ might be used9

for Persian words rather than an English equivalent. Many people (and primarily the younger
generation of university students) also use English ‘script’ for their text message communications. Almost all email communications are carried out using Farsi but written with English
script. The reverse case is where English words are used (e.g. as shop names) but in Persian
script. Examples include: ‘Lady’ beauty saloon; ‘Talk’ language school, ‘Prestige’ home decoration, etc., where words within inverted commas are written in Persian script.

10Use of English in spoken or written communication between Iranians in Urmia and elsewhere in
Iran is limited to very restricted situations. For example professionals familiar with English (andin particular English students and teachers) sometimes take the advantage of communicating in
English language (via email). Oral communication using English is almost non-existent apartfrom instances between learners or learners and teachers at language institute/university settings(particularly with beginner learners). However, many educated and internationally-oriented people in Urmia include some English words when speaking Turkish or Farsi (such as cancel, surprise, ok, etc. which are usually pronounced differently from their use in spoken English (e.g.
“surprise” is pronounced /surpiz/). Sprinkling a few English words in with Turkish or Farsi also
carries prestige. Some young people may also use occasional English words related to romance(e.g. seen in messages on walls) and sing songs in English (e.g. “Happy Birthday”) on some occasions. At the same time many English words have become part of the Turkish/Persian language such as tealeaf, bank, hotel, sandwich, jean[s],as well as numerous technology related
words (mainly common among new generation) such as computer, laptop, mobile, telephone,tablet, internet, file, save, delete, cut, paste, chat, email, address, user(name), pass(word), passport and so on. At times English is also used in humour, when for instance, in the famous Turkish ‘Samad Mamad Humour Series’, one of the characters who cannot speak Farsi properly, tries
to speak English to a woman in order to impress her, saying “I am a windows” or “I am a donkey”. Not knowing English is here seen as a sign of being uneducated. Similarly an Urmia-basedsociologist intersperses English words in his Persian writing: “A ‘Pofyooz’ … is someone who,
when he goes to Europe for 10 days, [miss]es his friends, becomes [happy] seeing them on return, [change]s his life [style] when he comes back, and drinks [coffee],” where the words insquare brackets appear in English in the Persian text.

English thus occupies a specific space in Urmia alongside Turkish and Farsi and carries additional meanings beyond those of a purely lexical nature. For example its use on shop signs andbuildings serves to attract attention. It can serve to signal prestige and status and membership ofa higher socio-economic class. When linked to products, it may signal quality. It can also signalthat its user is well educated and has an international perspective. It can serve to distinguishsomeone from those with a religious orientation. For some, it also means being young and can

11carry messages of love and romance. Our observations on the social meaning of English in Urmia are similar to Sayer's (2009) findings on the iconic and innovative uses of English in Oaxaca(a colonial city in southern Mexico), namely that “English is advanced and sophisticated; English
is fashion; English is being cool; and English is for expression of love”.

Iranian English

The fact that many educated Iranians are fluent English speakers raises the question of what kindof English they aim to speak. The emergence of the notions of English as an international language and lingua franca English suggests that like other users of English as a “foreign language”,
Iranian speakers of English have several choices as to the kind of English they might wish tomaster – whether it be a native-speaker target for spoken English with the accent of standard
British English or American English, for example, or an Iranian-flavored English – that is both
fluent and accurate but reflecting features of L1 phonology – whether this be Farsi, Turkish, etc.
(Seargeant, 2012). This latter variety of English is often observed among educated bilingual Iranians and it may be interpreted as a way of preserving a sense of Iranian identity through English. This however is an issue that awaits further research.
However, in a small- scale study (reported below) American English was the most-preferred variety of English for university students majoring in English as well as for language learners ininstitutes, with British English the next preferred variety. None of the students favoured an Irani12

an/localized version of English as their preferred variety of English. Indeed, while most Iranians
learning English seem to aim for an American or British model of spoken English, a local, Iranian accent is generally observable in Iranian speakers of English, especially in less proficient
speakers. Advanced learners of English also often use aspects of sentence stress and intonation in
ways that differ from native American or British English usage. Other features of the phonologyof Iranian speakers of English are traceable to L1 interference, such as problems with some initial and final consonants and consonant clusters, the specific difficulties depending on the learners L1 (e.g. Turkish or Farsi).

English in the media
Some English is also used in the media in Iran. Although major international English language channels
such as CNN and BBC are not currently available in Iran, some local channels have limited broadcasts in
English, intended for foreigners living in Iran. Most such programs (broadcast by Iran’s News Network
Channel and Channel 4) are news programs, however, documentaries (on wild life, lives of famous people, etc.)in English are also frequent on Channel 4. Similar news services exist on the radio as well,though on a more limited scale. The presenters on these programs generally have a North American accent and are Iranians who have lived or been educated in English speaking countries. Movies or other entertainments are rarely broadcast in English, but in bigger cities such as Tehran (but not in Urmia) cinemas are found which broadcast foreign films in their original language (sometimes with subtitles in English). However movies in English are readily available on the market for purchase and home-use. There
are some newspapers published in English in Iran such as Tehran Times and Iran Daily and these areavailable in Urmia. Their readers would typically be foreigners living in Iran and students majoring in
English who would like to develop their reading skills/vocabulary knowledge or to use excerpts for their
Translation and Reading Media courses. Some monthly entertainment periodicals (in English) such as
VIVA are also found, though on a limited scale.
English has a very limited presence in social media in Iran. Indeed most international social media such as
Facebook and Twitter and chatting services are banned in Iran, but most Internet users access these mediausing filtering devices. Linkedin is, however, not filtered in Iran and many university students and professors are active in this network, while Facebook is favoured by general public. Most posts in these social media are in Farsi or Farsi using English transcript. English students sometimes communicate in English in these media.

13

Reading materials in English
Most large cities in Iran including Urmia contain many bookshops selling books in English. Few
bookshops deal exclusively in English books, and most sell books in Persian and English, on a variety ofsubjects. In Urmia, there are at least five bookshops specializing in English books, with two exclusively
selling English books. Most of the books sold in these bookshops are academic texts - either books usedin language schools such as Interchange, Headway, Top Notch, etc., or books for university students majoring in English related to Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature. As noted above, thesebooks are locally printed (and generally unauthorized) copies of international books, including dictionaries, vocabulary books, grammar books, TOEFL/IELTS preparation kits, as well as simplified readers andfull length novels. Most of the books sold in these bookshops are ordered from Tehran on demand, andmore technical materials (for example books needed by PhD and MA students) as well as recentlypublished books are in the form of e-books rather than printed books. Some shop-owners specialize inpreparing e-books from various sources, which are then sold as e-books or printed and made into a book.
Apart from academic books, very little else in English is sold in bookshops. Such books that are intended
for the general public are generally phrase books, with titles such as ‘English while Travelling’. Books in
English are virtually non-existent in public libraries with the exception of General English books for university students (with key to exercises and translation of reading passages and vocabulary items), simplified readers and novels usually with a romantic focus as well as TOEFL or IELTS practice books and test
preparation booklets for university entrance examination (based on high school English books).

14

Motivation for learning English
In order to explore attitudes towards English and learning English, we administered a questionnaire to asample of 115 students in Urmia (26 male, 88 female, 1 not stated). These students were taking English
courses at a private institute (N= 30), or majoring in English (BA,N = 43;and MA,N =13) or in Chemistry(and taking a General English course) at Urmia University (N = 29).The participants’ age range was from
16 to 33 (with 72 percent of them being less than 23 years old). The Chemistry majors were typical of
non-English majors with little or no English learning experience and were administered the translated(Persian) version of the questionnaire. The institute students had taken English lessons for several semesters, while the majority of university students had studied English only at high school and as part of their
university English courses. Five percent of the participants rated their English proficiency as Beginner, 10
percent rated themselves as Advanced or native-like speakers of English while the majority rated themselves as being more or less Intermediate. Less than 15 percent of the students had visited a foreign country, with only two having visited an English-speaking country (England and Australia) and the rest having
travelled to countries such as Turkey or UAE where English is not a medium of communication.
To determine the students’ reasons for learning English, we asked the participants to rate16 reasons from“very important” (= score of 3), through “somewhat important” (2), to “not important (1). Their reasons
with mean scores are summarized in Table 1:

Table 1.
Motivation for learning English
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Because I like English 2.66
Because English is an international language 2.66
Because I want to travel 2.64
Because English is an important language 2.63
Because I want to go to university 2.57
Because I want to speak with native speakers of English 2.56
Because I want to find a good job 2.41
Because I want to continue my education abroad 2.38
Because I want to earn credits 2.33
Because I enjoy listening to English 2.30
Because I want to watch English films 2.20
Because I like English textbooks/materials 2.17
Because I want to live in a foreign country 2.09
Because I like my English teacher 1.99
Because everybody does 1.7

15

16 Because my parents want it 1.56

The data above suggests that for this group of students their reasons for studying English reflect their interest in the language, their recognition of its importance internationally, as well as the practical affordances and benefits it offers them. It can facilitate travel abroad, enable communication with nativespeakers, help students find employment as well as facilitate studies in higher education including study
abroad. Reasons with less pragmatic value for learners such as listening to English and watching films in
English are rated as less important for these learners. All in all, our observations support Meshkat and
Saeb's (2013) findings that Iranian EFL students are highly motivated to learn English.

Attitudes toward English
The same participants also completed a 27-item questionnaire that addressed their beliefs and attitudes
towards English. The following table lists the Likert-scale items that were scored from 1 (strongly disagree) through 2 (disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). All items with a score above 3.5 indicate a positive attitude toward English and items with a score of below 2.5 indicate a negative attitude as far as the relevant
item is concerned. The scores are interpreted in a reverse way for reverse items such as “English should
not be a compulsory subject in secondary schools in Iran”. Items with a score around 3 (between 2.5 and3.5) show a neutral position. All in all, out of 27 items, 24 indicate that the participating students have apositive attitude towards English while responses to three items suggest a neutral attitude toward English(though with a trend toward a positive attitude). Interestingly, no responses reflect a negative attitude toward English. The overall mean score of all items (3.98) reveals that, generally speaking, the participants’attitude toward English is very positive. The order of the items in Table 2moves from those with the highest positive attitude to those with the lowest positive attitude; that is, those in the first part of the table(items 1 through 24) indicate a positive attitude; and those in the second section (items 25 through 27), a
neutral attitude, with no items reflecting a negative attitude.

Table 2.
Attitudes toward English
1
2

I love talking with expatriates in English. 4.63
When I hear someone speaks English well, I wish I could speak like him or her. 4.53

16

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

I like seeing signs in English, writings on shops, cars, streets etc. 4.44
It is a good thing to have English as the foreign language in Iran. 4.41
The teaching of English should start as early as the first grade in the Iranian schools. 4.36
I like to see English films in English. 4.36
I like English emails, text messages. 4.20
The command of English is very helpful in understanding expatriates and their cultures. 4.15
I like reading English magazines, newspapers, books, etc. 4.10
I like the countries where English is spoken. 4.06
The use of English in government and business offices helps in getting things done easily. 4.05
I like people who speak English. 4.04
I am forced to learn English by the people around me. 1.96 [= 4.04]
If I use English, it means that I am not patriotic. 1.99 [= 4.01]
If I use English, my status is raised. 3.97
The spread of the use of English is one of the most crucial factors in Iran’s development today. 3.96
The development of our country is possible mainly by educated people who know English well. 3.95
I do not feel awkward when using English. 3.90
Frankly speaking English is not necessary in my life. 2.11 [= 3.89]
If I use English, I will be praised and approved of by my family, relatives and friends. 3.81
English films are more enjoyable than films in any other language. 3.76
I feel uncomfortable when hearing one Iranian speaking to another in English. 2.32 [=3.68]
English is the mark of an educated person. 3.65
English should be a medium of instruction in the schools in Iran. 3.59

25 English should not be a compulsory subject in secondary schools in Iran. 2.53 [= 3.47]
26 My social science and mathematics textbooks should be written in Persian. 3.38
27 At least some subjects like Physics and Chemistry should be taught in English at the secondary levelin Iran. 3.17

In order to triangulate the above data and to check the extent to which the opinions expressed reflect theactual views of the participants we also asked them a few general questions on their feelings towards English and English-speaking people. Below is a summary of our observations:
When asked whether they liked English, more than 87 percent of the students replied ‘yes’; when asked torate the degree of their liking on a scale of 1 to 10, the average score was 8.86. A slightly higher rate wasfound for both questions when candidates were asked about ‘learning English’. More than 90 percent of
the students reported that they would like to make friends with English-speaking people and that they
have positive feelings toward foreigners, both indications of a very positive attitude toward English.
When asked for their attitude towards Iranians who can speak English well, 73 out of 86 (more than 85
percent) stated that they felt respect towards such people; nearly 10 per cent envied those who spoke English well and only 3 percent expressed indifference toward Iranian users of English. Regarding their preference for a variety of English, the majority (more than 70 per cent) favoured American English, withsome 20 percent favouring British English; only 6 students (chemistry majors) said that they favoured a17

localized version of English as spoken by an educated Iranian. This is in line with Dahmardeh and Hunt's(2012) report that there is a common belief among Iranians that English belongs to America and that is
why most teachers and students prefer American English. Juxtaposing these figures alongside those reported in the above table as well as with the information described earlier in this paper, it is clear that university and private institute students in Urmia attach a very high value to English, a finding which we presume is more or less generalizable to other large cities in Iran, as evidenced by the growing demand forEnglish courses across Iran.

Conclusion
This paper aimed to explore the concept of the idea of English in Iran, to describe the status ofEnglish in Iran as reflected in language policy and societal practices and to explore the motivation behind learners’ desire to learn English. We examined the functions English serves in Iran,the values Iranians attach to English, the place of English in comparison to other languages spoken in Iran as well as the general attitudes of Iranians towards English and people who speak
English. To provide answers to these questions, we took the city of Urmia as an example andlooked at different purposes for which people used English in Urmia as well as its place in thedomains of public and private education, business, media, and academia.. We also carried out asmall-scale survey to investigate English language learners’ motivations in learning English andtheir attitudes toward the language. While further research is called for to arrive at a fuller picture of the role of English in Iran, our findings indicate that, as far as Urmia is concerned, theidea of English in Urmia is that of a language that is seen as a valuable asset for Iran and for Iranians, one that earns its speakers prestige and that enables people to interact with the wider
world. While this exploratory paper reflects the small amount of information currently available
on the role of English in Iran, findings of the kind revealed in this study can serve as a useful resource in planning for the teaching of English in Iran and in developing learning materials thatreflect the motivations and aspirations of young Iranians in relation to the learning of English.

Acknowledgments
We wish to thank the participants in the survey research who provided us with invaluable information on
their reasons for learning English as well as their attitudes toward English. We are also grateful to five
readers who provided useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
18

References
Atai, M.R., & Mazlum, F. (2013). English language teaching curriculum in Iran: Planning and practice.
The Curriculum Journal, 24(3), 389-411.
Birjandi, P., Soheili, A. Norouzi, M., & Mahmoodi, G. (1994). English Book 1. Tehran: Iran's School
Book Publishers.
Dahmardeh, M. (2009). Communicative textbooks: English Language textbooks in Iranian secondary
school. Linguistik Online, 40(4), 45-61.
Dahmardeh, M, & Hunt, M. (2012). Motivation and English language teaching in Iran. Studies in Literature and Language, 5(2), 36-43.
Ghorbani, M.R. (2009). ELT in Iranian high schools in Iran, Malaysia and Japan. Reflections on English
Language Teaching, 8(2), 131-139.
Kiany, G.R., Mahdavy, B., & Ghafar Samar, R. (2011). Towards a harmonized foreign language education in Iran: National policies and English achievement. Literacy Information and Computer Education
Journal, 2(3), 462-469.
Khedir Sharabian, Sh., Kheierabadi, Reza, Alavi Moghaddam, S. Behnam, Anani Sarab, Mohammad
Reza, Forouzandeh Shahraki, Elham, & Ghorbani, N. (2013). English for Schools: Prospect 1. Tehran:Iran's School Book Publishers.
Kogar, T. (2014). We change people's lives; Commodifcation of English in Thailand. The New English
Teacher, 8(1), 142-161.
Meshkat, M., & Saeb, F. (2013). High school students' beliefs about language learning. ROSHD ELT,
28(1), 50-55.
New York Times. June 24.
Sayer, P. (2009). Using the linguistics landscape as a pedagogic resource. ELT Journal, 64(2), 143-154.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The idea of English in Japan: Ideology and the evolution of a global language.
Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Seargeant, P. (2012). Exploring world Englishes: Language in a global context. Oxford: Routledge.
Internet sources
www.sanjesh.org
www.talif.sch.ir
Wikipedia online

19