Name: 睿 钟Organization: Internet Society of China
Submission ID: 95

Questions Concerning the Proposal as a Whole
1) Completeness and clarity: Is the combined proposal complete? Each of the operational
community proposals contains aspects to be completed in the future when the proposal isimplemented. Is the combined proposal specified in sufficient detail such that it can beevaluated against the NTIA criteria?

2) Compatibility and interoperability: Do the operational community proposals work
together in a single proposal? Do they suggest any incompatible arrangements wherecompatibility appears to be required? Is the handling of any conflicting overlaps between
the functions resolved in a workable manner?

3) Accountability: Do the operational community proposals together include appropriate
and properly supported independent accountability mechanisms for running the IANA
functions? Are there any gaps in overall accountability under the single proposal?

4) Workability: Do the results of any tests or evaluations of workability that were includedin the operational community proposals conflict with each other or raise possible concerns
when considered in combination?

Questions Concerning NTIA Criteria
5) Do you believe the proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model? If yes,please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe
are necessary.

6) Do you believe the proposal maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS?
If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications youbelieve are necessary.

7) Do you believe the proposal meets the needs and expectations of the global customers
and partners of the IANA services? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why andwhat proposal modifications you believe are necessary. Please indicate if you are acustomer or partner of the IANA services.

8) Do you believe the proposal maintains the openness of the Internet? If yes, please
explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe arenecessary.

9) Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a governmentled or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary. If not, please explain why.

10) Do you believe that the implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold theNTIA criteria in the future? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and whatproposal modifications you believe are necessary.

Questions Concerning ICG Report and Executive Summary
11) Do you believe the ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
aspects of the overall proposal? If not, please explain what modifications you believe arenecessary.

General Questions
12) Do you have any general comments for the ICG about the proposal?

中国互联网协会（Internet Society of China, ISC）对ICG和各社群卓有成效的工作表示万分的敬意，对运营社群提案的整合工作成果表示祝贺，同时也对ICANN及时提供中文版的提案文本以及中文的评论通道表示感谢！
ISC从域名提案中了解到，PTI董事会成员由ICANN指派，但尚未看到比较详细的PTI董事会成员遴选细则，且对于该董事会的决策机制和流程也缺乏描述，建议后续能对此进行完善。
IANA职能审核小组的审核目标包括评估IANA职能运营商及任何相关监督监督机构的履职情况及其待改进
方面等内容，但是对于应该采取什么样的措施或原则，以促进和保障这些改进建议能够得到具体落实，提案中也尚未看到有明确的描述。
以上两点评论，仅供参考。再次祝贺和感谢ICG和各社群的工作！