Name: Richard Hunter
Organization: The Home Depot
Submission ID: 5

Questions Concerning the Proposal as a Whole1) Completeness and clarity: Is the combined proposal complete? Each of the operational
community proposals contains aspects to be completed in the future when the proposal isimplemented. Is the combined proposal specified in sufficient detail such that it can beevaluated against the NTIA criteria?

No the combined proposal is not complete. It lacks a way to completely remove and disband it. We
do not need another government EPA to regulate the internet in any form.

2) Compatibility and interoperability: Do the operational community proposals work
together in a single proposal? Do they suggest any incompatible arrangements wherecompatibility appears to be required? Is the handling of any conflicting overlaps between
the functions resolved in a workable manner?

No the operational community proposals do not work together in a single proposal because there isno single proposal to eliminate and remove this entire process.

3) Accountability: Do the operational community proposals together include appropriate
and properly supported independent accountability mechanisms for running the IANAfunctions? Are there any gaps in overall accountability under the single proposal?

Yes there any gaps in overall accountability under the single proposal because there is noaccountability in this IANA function. We the people do not get to vote on the IANA, who sits in it,
who runs it, while we have to fund it.

4) Workability: Do the results of any tests or evaluations of workability that were includedin the operational community proposals conflict with each other or raise possible concerns
when considered in combination?

Yes there are conflicts in the operational community proposals because this allows too much powerin the hands of too few people.

Questions Concerning NTIA Criteria
5) Do you believe the proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model? If yes,

please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe
are necessary.

No I do not believe the proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model. I propose you
do nothing and disband and cancel the IANA functions. We simply cannot afford another EPA likeentity funded by American citizens.

6) Do you believe the proposal maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS?
If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you
believe are necessary.

No, this proposal does not maintain the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS. In fact, this will
do the opposite by limiting the freedom individuals have over their gifts and talents and it will makethe platforms less secure, more watched and therefore limit free speech, less stable, less resilient,and put this power in the hands of our enemies who will never agree to these rules and laws.

7) Do you believe the proposal meets the needs and expectations of the global customers
and partners of the IANA services? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why andwhat proposal modifications you believe are necessary. Please indicate if you are acustomer or partner of the IANA services.

No, the proposal does not meet the needs and expectations of the global customers and partners of
the IANA services because our enemies will never agree to this and will continue to hack into ourlives and government.

8) Do you believe the proposal maintains the openness of the Internet? If yes, please
explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe arenecessary.

I believe this proposal will do just the opposite and close the internet by censoring and limiting freespeech and the exchange of ideas and thoughts. This proposal puts excessive power in the hands of afew people who will determine outcomes. I find it similar to the Supreme Court of America where a
few supposed master minds will make poor decisions similar to Plessy v Ferguson, or Koramotsu andsimilar.

9) Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a governmentled or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes, please explain why and what

proposal modifications you believe are necessary. If not, please explain why.

Yes I am concerned the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a government-led or intergovernmental organization solution. As stated above too much power in the hands of a too few
supposed noble and virtuous human beings who are flawed and susceptible to power and money. Mysuggestion: close down immediately and stop doing this.

10) Do you believe that the implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold theNTIA criteria in the future? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary.

No I do not believe that the implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold the NTIA criteria
in the future. My suggestion, end this non-sense and close down.

Questions Concerning ICG Report and Executive Summary
11) Do you believe the ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
aspects of the overall proposal? If not, please explain what modifications you believe arenecessary.

No I do not believe the ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary aspects of
the overall proposal because there is no way to end this enterprise when bad decisions are made andno one is held accountable, while the people who created the very laws that destroyed free speech
and ideas are millionaires and billionaires. I think this should be cancelled that nothing should bedone by this organization and that you should all go home and try to add value.

General Questions12) Do you have any general comments for the ICG about the proposal?

I detest this entire proposal where is the ability to end it this program by the people? One moregovernment program is going to do nothing to give people their individual freedom to pursue theirendeavors.