Name: Terry Carch
Organization: wespac
Submission ID: 150

Questions Concerning the Proposal as a Whole
1) Completeness and clarity: Is the combined proposal complete? Each of the operational
community proposals contains aspects to be completed in the future when the proposal isimplemented. Is the combined proposal specified in sufficient detail such that it can beevaluated against the NTIA criteria?

Yes.

2) Compatibility and interoperability: Do the operational community proposals work
together in a single proposal? Do they suggest any incompatible arrangements wherecompatibility appears to be required? Is the handling of any conflicting overlaps between
the functions resolved in a workable manner?

No changes required.

3) Accountability: Do the operational community proposals together include appropriate
and properly supported independent accountability mechanisms for running the IANAfunctions? Are there any gaps in overall accountability under the single proposal?

No changes required.

4) Workability: Do the results of any tests or evaluations of workability that were includedin the operational community proposals conflict with each other or raise possible concerns
when considered in combination?

There is a conflict of interest talking points. More free and pen transparency under the First
Amendment Freedom of press and more open information on the internet without all the www//httpetc.

Questions Concerning NTIA Criteria
5) Do you believe the proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model? If yes,please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe
are necessary.

Modifications on shorter IP address. Right now the new proposals will make the internet much hardto access and information more difficult to access as well as concerns for the right to privacy etc.

6) Do you believe the proposal maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS?
If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications youbelieve are necessary.

The internet is a free and open information network and should remain free and open for anyone
seeking information which cannot be open on TV and radio. Any changes would mean a violation ofthe United States Constitution abridging the rights of privacy and freedom and also a slower accessto the internet if IP addresses. Any changes to the IP address will slow down the internet even more
so since here in the United States our internet is the slowest in the world.

7) Do you believe the proposal meets the needs and expectations of the global customers
and partners of the IANA services? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why andwhat proposal modifications you believe are necessary. Please indicate if you are acustomer or partner of the IANA services.

I would not want to make any changes except for making IP addresses shorter and easier and fasterto on to the internet due to the above mentioned slowness of he internet.

8) Do you believe the proposal maintains the openness of the Internet? If yes, please
explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe arenecessary.

Same as the above. LOgging onto the Internet is very slow here in the US.

9) Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a governmentled or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary. If not, please explain why.

Yes This will make the internet less accessible to everyone who needs to look up information and thefreedom to read and write what one wishes to express his thoughts,feelings and desires for a more
free and open society here on Earth.

10) Do you believe that the implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold theNTIA criteria in the future? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary.

No because I`m very concerned that the corporate takeover of the internet along with the TPP,TTIP,TiDA and so on will not allow the rest of the world free and open access to the internet will infringe
our very human rights to a free and open internet as well as our very own right to privacy.Modi

Questions Concerning ICG Report and Executive Summary11) Do you believe the ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
aspects of the overall proposal? If not, please explain what modifications you believe arenecessary.

Modifications should not be changed except for shorted IP addresses. Freedom of the press,freedom
to publish freely without the scrutiny of governments,corporations who spy on innocent humanbeings who speak out and the right to privacy and the right to seek informations is a human right forevery free idependent health and well being in any society is imperative. "No one should EVER beabove the law. an dictate to AANY human being right or wrong!"

General Questions
12) Do you have any general comments for the ICG about the proposal?

"STOP trying to restrict the internet and making life harder for us lowly 99% to please only thecorporate 1%. Please leave things as they are and return our basic human rights and free speechand freedom to look up what what one needs and wushes without being spied on.