Appendix
Achievement Targets of Basic Programme for Persons with Disabilities (Fourth)
1. Development of safe and secure living environments
Current figure(latest figure)Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Securement of houses

Establishment of safe
and secure living
environments for
persons with disabilities

Number of registered
dwelling units that are
intended for the promotionof smooth move-in for
persons requiring housing
support, such as persons
with disabilities
Expected amount ofservices to support
cohabitation―

Number of municipalities or
welfare blocs for persons
with disabilities that have
set up one or more support
bases for community life

37 municipalities and 9
blocs(April 2017)

Support for safe andsecure lives of persons
with disabilities incommunity
Establishment of support
systems for safe andsecure lives of persons
with disabilities in thecommunity

1(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present as therelated law was enforced infiscal 2017.

108,000 persons(February 2017)

Target figure
175,000 units(fiscal 2020)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)
All areas(fiscal 2020)(Note) Municipalities or welfare
blocs for persons withdisabilities will each have one
base at least.

Target area

Development ofmobility-supporting
environments

Situation to grasp

Number of local
governments promoting
projects to establish
comprehensive care systems
applicable to mental
disabilities as well
Ratio of municipalities thathave set up housing support
councils or participated inthemProgress in work to
Barrier-free ratio at set
make passenger facilities passenger facilities(*1)
barrier-free

Progress in work to
make vehicles, etc.
barrier-free

Current figure(latest figure)

Index

Ratio of barrier-freevehicles, etc.(*2)

2―(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2017.

Target figure
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

40%(March 2017)80%(fiscal 2020)

Elimination of differences inlevel: 87.2%(fiscal 2016)
Installation of tactile
walking surface indicatorsfor visually impaired people:
93.8%(fiscal 2016)
Installation of lavatories
friendly to persons withdisabilities: 84.2%(fiscal 2016)
Barrier-free ratio of rail cars:
67.7%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 100(fiscal 2020)

Approx. 100(fiscal 2020)

Approx. 70%(fiscal 2020)

Target area

Promotion of facilities,
products, etc. paying
heed to accessibility

Situation to grasp

Progress in work to
make facilities, etc.,
used by many andunspecified people
barrier-free

Index

Barrier-free ratio ofbuildings used by many andunspecified people, etc.(*3)
Barrier-free ratio of
pathways in urban parks,
squares, parking lots andlavatories

3

Current figure(latest figure)
Adoption ratio of non-stepbuses (excluding busescertified as exempted fromstandards): 53.3%(fiscal 2016)
Adoption ratio of lift- or
slope-equipped busses to all
buses certified as exemptedfrom standards: 6.0%
(fiscal 2016)
Number of welfare taxis
among taxis: 15,128(fiscal 2016)
Ratio of barrier-freepassenger ships: 40.3%(fiscal 2016)
Ratio of barrier-free aircraft:
97.1%(fiscal 2016)58%(fiscal 2016)
Park pathways and squares:
Approx. 49%(fiscal 2015)
Parking lots: Approx. 46%(fiscal 2015)
Lavatories: Approx. 35%(fiscal 2015)

Target figure
Approx. 70%(fiscal 2020)

Approx. 25%(fiscal 2020)

Approx. 28,000(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 50%(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 90%(fiscal 2020)
60%(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 60%(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 60%(fiscal 2020)
Approx. 45%(fiscal 2020)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Comprehensive urban
development with carefor persons withdisabilities

Development of roads
with care for persons
with disabilities
Establishment of traffic
safety facilities, etc.
friendly to persons withdisabilities

Percentage of designatedroads that have incorporated
barrier-free design
Barrier-free ratio of traffic
signals, etc. on main roads
used for daily life
Ratio of death and injury
accident prevention by
humps, etc. installed onroads for daily life

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

88%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2020)

99.5%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2020)―

Prevention by approx. 30%
from 2014(fiscal 2020)(*1) The ratio of facilities clearing standards for smooth public transportation, etc. under the Act on Promotion of Smooth Transportation, etc. to all passenger facilities(railway stations, bus terminals, passenger ship terminals, and passenger aircraft terminals) used by more than 3,000 people on average per day(*2) The ratio of barrier-free vehicles, etc. that have cleared standards for smooth public transportation, etc.
(*3) The ratio of buildings clearing standards for smooth public transportation, etc. under the Act on Promotion of Smooth Transportation, etc. to the total stock numberof specifically designed buildings with a floor space of 2,000 square meters or more (hospitals, theaters, hotels, homes for the aged and others used by an unspecified
number of people, especially elderly people, persons with disabilities, etc.)42. Improvement of accessibility to information and upgrading of support for communication
Target sector

Situation to grasp

Improvement ofaccessibility to
information intelecommunications

Progress in support for
improvement of
information andcommunication paying
heed to persons withdisabilities

Index

Ratio of practically applied
cases more than 3 years
after completion of “support
project for technological,
etc. research anddevelopment for eliminationof digital divides.”(Cumulative) Number ofProgress in practicalapplication of equipment devices commercially
produced throughuseful for improvement
development subsidies
of communication
under project to promote
development of equipment
to support independence of
persons with disabilities

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

40%(fiscal 2013)

Similar level from previous
year(-fiscal 2022)

27(fiscal 2016)84(fiscal 2018)

NHK General: 97.4%
Five Tokyo-based key
broadcasting stations: 99.5%(fiscal 2016)

NHK General and Five
Tokyo-based key
broadcasting stations: 100%
(fiscal 2022)(Note) Many devices took
several years fromsubsidization to commercial
production

Upgrading supply of
information

Dissemination ofbroadcasting programs
paying heed to persons
with disabilities

Ratio of broadcasting hoursof captioned programs to all
programs under review(Note) 100% after expanding
daily length of broadcasting
hours under review to 18 per
day from 17

5

Target sector

Situation to grasp

Index
Ratio of broadcasting hours
of explanatory programs toall programs under review

Progress in support forincreasing
communication andbroadcasting paying
heed to persons withdisabilities

Establishment of bases
providing information topersons with disabilities
in community

Ratio of services inoperation 2 years after
completion of subsidy
program for “promoting
supply and development,
etc. of communication andbroadcasting services for
persons with disabilities.”
Number of prefectures
having facilities to provide
information for persons withhearing disabilities

6

Current figure(latest figure)
NHK General: 12.7%
NHK Educational: 17.9%
Five Tokyo-based key
broadcasting stations: 11.7%
on average(fiscal 2016)92.6%(fiscal 2014)45(fiscal 2016)

Target figure
NHK General and Five
Tokyo-based key
broadcasting stations: morethan 13.5%
NHK Educational: Morethan 19%(fiscal 2022)
Similar level from previous
year(-fiscal 2022)

47(fiscal 2018)

Target sector

Situation to grasp

Index

Upgrading of support
for communication

Moves for practical use
of support equipment forcommunication(Cumulative) Number ofdevices commercially
produced throughdevelopment subsidies
under project to promote
development of equipment
to support independence of
persons with disabilities[Reposting]Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

27(fiscal 2016)84(fiscal 2018)―(To be set based on resultsof fiscal 2017 survey andopinions by parties
concerned, etc.)(Note) Many devices took
several years fromsubsidization to commercial
production

Improvement ofaccessibility to
government information

Secured accessibility to
information on websitesof public organs

Rate of compliance with JIS
standards for barrier-freeaccess to information on
websites of public organs

7(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of surveys in fiscal
20173. Promotion of disaster and crime prevention measures, etc.
Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Promotion of disasterprevention measures

Establishment ofenvironments capable ofproviding medical careand welfare services
even at time of disaster

Ratio of measures
implemented to protect
facilities for persons in needof consideration and disasterprevention bases and savehuman lives from landslide
damageRatio of firefighting
headquarters having systems
enabling persons withhearing and language
disabilities to place
emergency calls to 119 forfiling reports by means ofsmartphone and otherdevicesNumber of follow-up
articles on measures for
persons with disabilities andreports on new cases posted
in “collection of cases –reconstruction fromviewpoint of genderequality”

Establishment ofenvironments enablingsmooth reports by
persons with disabilities

Promotion ofreconstruction

Implementation ofprograms for persons
with disabilities inreconstruction measures

8

Current figure(latest figure)
Approx. 39%(fiscal 2016)

Roughly 41%(fiscal 2020)

Approx. 18%(May 2017)100%(fiscal 2020)

One(fiscal 2016)

Four(fiscal 2018 to 2020)(Note) follow-up article(Note) Total of follow-up
articles and reports on new
cases

Target figureTarget area

Situation to grasp

Index

Prevention of consumer
trouble, and relief fromdamageEstablishment ofsystems to warmly
watch persons withdisabilities and otherconsumers in need of
special consideration in
consumer life

Number of municipalities(with population of morethan 50,000) that have local
councils for securement ofconsumer safety

9

Current figure(latest figure)38 municipalities(January 2018)

Target figure
All municipalities withpopulation of more than
50,000(fiscal 2019)4. Elimination of discrimination, promotion of rights advocacy, and prevention of abuse
Current figure(latest figure)Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Promotion of rights
advocacy andprevention of abuse

Implementation of peer
support

Number of local
governments implementing
projects to support transitionand life in community(projects related to peer
support)
Number of local
governments implementing
projects to promoteestablishment ofcomprehensive care systems
applicable to persons withmental disabilities as well(projects related to peer
support)Ratio of local governmentsthat have prepared Handling
Directions based on Act for
Eliminating Discrimination
against Persons with
Disabilities

25(fiscal 2015)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)―

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

Core cities*4: 92.7%(April 2017)
Other municipalities*5:
61.6%(April 2017)100%(fiscal 2022)
100%(fiscal 2022)

Ratio of local governments
having Regional Support
Councils for Eliminating
Discrimination against
Persons with Disabilities

Core cities*4: 68.3%(April 2017)
Other municipalities*5:37.8%(April 2017)100%(fiscal 2022)
More than 70%(fiscal 2022)

Promotion ofelimination of
discrimination based on
disabilities

Preparation of publicservice regulations thatadministrative organ
officials should respectfor elimination of
discrimination against
persons with disabilities
Formation of networkfor effective and smooth
implementation ofprograms in community

10(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2017.

Target figure*4: Core cities, special districts, and prefectural capitals (excluding government-designated cities)*5: Cities other than government-designated cities and core cities (*4)

11

5. Promotion of support for independent life and decision-making
Target area

Situation to grasp

Establishment ofcounseling and support
system

Implementation ofcounselling and support
for persons withdisabilities, etc.

Index
Number of people using
counselling and support
projects

Current figure(latest figure)Counselling and support forplans: 144,000(September 2017)12,290(fiscal 2016)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2020)

119,721(fiscal 2015)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

Counselling and support forchildren with disabilities:
49,000(September 2017)
Number of people who havecompleted “beginningcounselling and supporting
personnel training” held byprefectures
Number of counsellingcases at counselling andsupport centers for
intractable/rare diseases

12

Target figureTarget area

Situation to grasp

Index

Establishment of support
systems fordevelopmental
disabilities

Ratio of municipalities andgovernment-designatedcities having local councils
to support persons with
developmental disabilities

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

87%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)

41,000(fiscal 2005 to 2015)

55,000(fiscal 2005 to 2020)

108,000 people(February 2017)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(Note) The councils had beencalled “examinationcommittees for establishmentof support systems for
persons with developmental
disabilities” until fiscal 2016

Enrichment of transition
support to community
life, home care services,
etc.

Transition of residents in (Cumulative) Number of
welfare facilities
residents in welfare
facilities transferred tocommunity life
Implementation of
Expected amount of
support for smoothservices to support
transition to community cohabitation [Reposting]life
Expected amount ofservices to support
independent life―

Hours used for home visitoriented services

5,425,635 hours(fiscal 2016)13(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2018.

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index
Expected amount ofservices for training forindependence (functional
exercise and training fordaily life)
Expected amount ofservices for short-term stay

Establishment of support
systems for smoothtransition to community
life

Enrichment of support
for children withdisabilities

Number of municipalities
and welfare blocs for
persons with disabilities thathave set up one or more
support bases forcommunity life [Reposting]Number of local
governments promoting
projects to establish
comprehensive care systems
applicable to mental
disabilities as well
[Reposting]
Implementation of
Number of businesssupport for children with establishments providing
disabilities
development support forchildren with disabilities(Note) Based on Child Welfare

14

Current figure(latest figure)
16,000 people(February 2017)

302,391 man-days(fiscal 2016)37 municipalities and 9
blocs(April 2017)―(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2017

Development support forchildren with disabilities:
3,931 businessestablishments(March 2016)

Target figure(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc. )All areas(fiscal 2020)(Note) Municipalities or welfare
blocs for persons withdisabilities will each have one
base at least.

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index
Act, etc.

Implementation of training
for career advancement ofnurses for children, etc.

15

Current figure
Target figure(latest figure)
Medical development
support for children withdisabilities: 99 businessestablishment(March 2016)
Day services for after-school
children: 7835 businessestablishments(March 2016)
Nursery center visiting
support: 412 businessestablishments(March 2016)
Development support centerfor children with disabilities:
505 business establishments(March 2016)
Home for children withdisabilities: 376 businessestablishments(March 2016)―(To be set based on fifth(Note) The current figure cannot welfare plans for persons
be calculated at present due to with disabilities to be
the launch of the project inprepared by local
fiscal 2017.
governments, etc.)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Implementation of
support for children withsevere physical andmental disabilities

Number of businessestablishments offeringdevelopment support, etc.
for children with severe
physical and mental
disabilities(Note) Based on Child Welfare
Act, etc.

Establishment of support
systems for persons with
developmental
disabilities

Ratio of prefectures andgovernment-designatedcities having set up two or
more support centers for
persons with developmental
disabilities or assigned local
support managers

Programs to facilitate
understanding ofdevelopmental
disabilities among
healthcare practitioners

Ratio of prefectures andgovernment-designatedcities conducting training toenhance the readiness ofprimary care doctors, etc.
to treat developmental
disabilities for primary caredoctors
16

Current figure(latest figure)
Development support forchildren with disabilities:
237 business establishments(fiscal 2016)
Medical development
support for children withdisabilities: 55 businessestablishment(fiscal 2016)
Day services for after-school
children: 720 businessestablishments(fiscal 2016)70%(fiscal 2016)

Target figure(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(Note) In principle,
municipalities each areassumed to have at least one
place (fiscal 2020)

100%(fiscal 2022)(Note) Breakdown- Ratio for establishment ofmultiple support centers for
persons with developmental
disabilities: 25.4%- Ratio of assignment of local
support managers: 56.7%

15%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Improvement of qualityof welfare services for
persons with disabilities

Fostering of experts tooffer guidance to service
providersNumber of people
completing training held byprefectures for leaders
responsible for service
management
Number of people
completing training held byprefectures for leaders
responsible for managementof development support forchildren with disabilities(Cumulative) Number ofdevices commercially
produced throughdevelopment subsidies
under project to promote
development of equipment
to support independence of
persons with disabilities[Reposting]

Promotion and researchand development ofassistive products
contributing to
improvement ofaccessibility andfostering of assistancedogs for physicallydisabled people

Commercial productionof equipment
contributing to
improvement ofaccessibility by persons
with disabilities(Note) Many devices took
several years fromsubsidization to commercial
production

17

Current figure(latest figure)
14,919(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2020)

6,340(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2020)27(fiscal 2016)84(fiscal 2018)

Target figureTarget area

Situation to grasp

Index

Current figure(latest figure)

Commercialization rate of50%
market products three years (fiscal 2016)
after completion ofsubsidized work underdevelopment support projectfor practical realization ofsolutions-oriented welfare
equipment

18

Target figure
More than 50%(-fiscal 2022)

6. Promotion of health and medical care
Target area

Situation to grasp

Appropriate provision of Long-term
mental health andhospitalization in mental
medical care
wards

Index
Number of patientssubjected to long-term
hospitalization of more than
one year in mental wards

Current figure(latest figure)
Approx. 185,000(fiscal 2014)

146,000 to 157,000(fiscal 2020)

22.7%(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

500 people(February 2017)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc. )Target figure(Note) Demented patients
includedSocial rehabilitation ofpeople subjected tomental healthsupervision

Ratio of people for whom
termination of treatment
was decided (note) andpeople who ended thetreatment to annual numberof mental health supervisioncases handled(Note) Limited to decisions oftermination of treatment to
the request by the director of
the probation office based on
Article 56, Paragraph 1 andItem 2 of the Act on Medical
Care and Treatment for
Persons Who Have Caused
Serious Cases Under theCondition of Insanity

Implementation of
measures for transitionof persons with mental
disabilities tocommunity life

Expected amount ofservices to support
transition to community

19

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index
Expected amount ofservices for community life
fixing support

Establishment ofsystems offering mental
and medical care

Implementation of
measures for promotionof mental health

Current figure(latest figure)3,000 people(February 2017)

Number of local
governments implementing
community transition andcommunity life fixing
support projects [partially
reposting]Number of local
governments promoting
projects to establish
comprehensive care systems
applicable to mental
disabilities as well
[Reposting]Number of designatedmedical institutions(hospitals and health clinics)
to which persons withdisabilities can go

Outreach project: threeorganizations(fiscal 2015)
Peer support utilization
project: 25 organizations(fiscal 2015)―

Ratio of businessestablishments working formental health

56.6%(fiscal 2016)20(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2017.

595(October 2017)(Note) Five prefectures yet toclear the standard for “morethan two or three institutions
per population of 1 million”

Target figure(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)
Increase from previous year(-2022)
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

More than two or three
institutions per populationof 1 million in all
prefectures(fiscal 2018)
More than 80%(fiscal 2022)

Target area

Enrichment of healthand medical care

Situation to grasp

Index

Dissemination of
information concerning
promotion of mental
healthEstablishment ofsystems to accept
persons with disabilities
in need of medical care

Number of accesses to
website “Mental Health for
All People”
Expected amount ofservices for short-term
medical stay

Current figure(latest figure)294,007(fiscal 2015)

25,877 man-days(fiscal 2016)

305 institutions(April 2016)

Implementation of
measures for transitionof persons withdisabilities tocommunity life

Number of local
governments promoting
projects to establish
comprehensive care systems
applicable to mental
disabilities as well
[Reposting]Number of local
governments implementing
community transition andcommunity life fixing
support projects [Reposting]

21―(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the project infiscal 2017.

Outreach project: 3organizations(fiscal 2015)
Peer support utilization
project: 25 organizations(fiscal 2015)

Target figure
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

Increase from previous
year)(-fiscal 2022)
Increase from previous
year)(-fiscal 2022)

Target area

Promotion of researchand development, etc.
that contribute toimprovement of healthand medical care

Situation to grasp

Index

Implementation of
measures to promotedental and oral healthcare at welfare facilities

Implementation ratio of
regular dental examinations
at support facilities for
persons with disabilities andaccommodation facilities forchildren with disabilities
Number of counsellingcases at counselling andsupport centers for
intractable/rare diseases[Reposting]Number of reported clinical
trialsNumber of pharmaceutical
approvals for new drugs andof application expansions
for existing drugs

Implementation ofcounselling and support
for patients withintractable/rare diseases,
etc.
Research anddevelopment of drugs,
etc.

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

62.9%(fiscal 2016)

90%(fiscal 2022)

119,721(fiscal 2015)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

645(fiscal 2016)
3(end of fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)
More than 11(around 2020)9(fiscal 2016)20(fiscal 2018)(Note) Amyotrophic lateralsclerosis, distal myopathy,
etc.

Number of uses of
biological drug production
technologies meeting theinternational standards

22

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Current figure(latest figure)

Number of reported plans116
for provision of regenerative (fiscal 2016)
medical treatment, etc.
based on the Act on the
Safety of Regenerative
Medicine, etc.

Target figure
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)(Note) Limited to clinical trials

Research anddevelopment of medical
equipment, etc.

Implementation of
support for research anddevelopment of drugs,
etc.

Number of innovative
medical devices andsystems put into practicaluse
Commercialization rate ofmarket products 3 years
after completion ofsubsidized work underdevelopment support projectfor practical realization ofsolutions-oriented welfare
equipment [Reposting]Number of cases offering
RS Strategy Consultation(Note) RS Strategy
Consultation: Regulatory
Science Strategy Consultation

23

None
(fiscal 2016)5(fiscal 2020)50%(by fiscal 2016)

More than 50%(-fiscal 2022)

100(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Fostering andsecurement of humanresources who support
health and medical care

Establishment ofsystems to nurture
human resources forhealth and medical carein the community

Promotion of health andmedical care programsfor intractable/rare
diseases

Subsidies for medical
expenses concerning
intractable/rare disease
Implementation ofcounselling and support
for patients withintractable/rare diseases
Research anddevelopment of drugs,
etc. for intractable/rare
diseases

Index
Number of pharmaceuticalapplications for items
subject to project to develop
methods of assessing
products for regenerative
medicine, etc.
Number of local
governments conducting
projects to promote
education of personnel
engaged in health careservices in the community
Number of holders ofcertificates issued forspecific disease treatment
Number of counsellingcases at counselling andsupport centers for
intractable/rare diseases[Reposting]Number of pharmaceutical
approvals for new drugs andof application expansions ofexisting drugs [Reposting](Note) Amyotrophic lateralsclerosis, distal myopathy,
etc.

24

Current figure(latest figure)Target figureNone(fiscal 2016)3(fiscal 2018)111(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

986,071(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

119,721(fiscal 2015)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

3(end of fiscal 2016)

More than 11(around 2020)

Target area

Prevention andtreatment of diseases,
etc. that cause
disabilities

Situation to grasp

Index

Establishment ofsystems to provide
medical care concerning
intractable/rare diseases

Establishment rate of linked
hospitals for examinationand treatment of
intractable/rare diseases in
prefectures
Number of local
governments implementing
community transition andcommunity life fixing
support projects (outreachprojects) [Reposting]Number of local
governments promoting
projects to establish
comprehensive care systems
applicable to mental
disabilities as well
[Reposting]

Implementation of
support for patients of
diseases, injuries, etc.

25

Current figure(latest figure)―(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the new projectin fiscal 2018

Target figure
100%(fiscal 2022)

3(fiscal 2015)

Increase from previous(-fiscal 2022)―

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the new projectin fiscal 2017.

7. Enrichment of consideration at government, etc.
Target area
Consideration inelections, etc.

Situation of grasp

Index

Implementation of
consideration forvisually impaired people
in elections

Number of prefectures
distributing “notice ofelection” in braille andaudio versions in national
elections
Measures taken such as
elimination of differences inlevels at voting stations andearly-voting stations fornational elections

Implementation of carefor persons withphysical disabilities inelections26

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

47(fiscal 2016)47(fiscal 2022)

Early-voting stations: 99.5%(fiscal 2016)
Voting stations: 99.8%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)
100%(fiscal 2022)

8. Support for employment, work, and economic independence
Target area
Comprehensive support
for work

Situation to grasp
Implementation of
support for work

Establishment ofsystems to provide
support for work

Employment of persons
with disabilities who
have received support
for work

Index
Number of users of support
for transition to work

Current figure(latest figure)
Equivalent to 542,000 mandays(fiscal 2015)

Number of users of welfare
facilities for induction to
support centers for
employment and lives of
persons with disabilities
from welfare facilities
Number of nurtured job
coaches―

Annual number of persons
transiting to generalemployment

14,000(fiscal 2015)27(Note) The current figure isunavailable before the launchof surveys.

8,613(fiscal 2016)

Target figure(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)(To be set based on new
medium-term goal ofindependent administrative
body Japan Organization
for Employment of Elderly
Persons with Disabilities
and Job Seekers)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Workshop retention of
persons with disabilities
who have received
support for work

Index
Number of employedpersons among thoseregistered with support
centers for employment andlives of persons withdisabilities
Employment rate ofgraduates from polytechnic
schools
Employment rate of persons
with disabilities who havecompleted commissioned
training
Workshop retention rate ofpersons one year after
support under support
project for workshop
retention(Note) Ratio of employedpersons among those whohave received care for living,
training for independence,
support for transition to workand support for continuous
work under Act onComprehensive Support for
Persons with Disabilities

28

Current figure(latest figure)
19,000(fiscal 2016)

24,000(fiscal 2022)

70.7%(fiscal 2015)70%(fiscal 2022)

47.9%(fiscal 2015)55%(fiscal 2022)―

More than 80%(fiscal 2018-2020)(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of the new projectin fiscal 2018.

Target figureTarget area

Promotion of
employment of persons
with disabilities

Situation to grasp

Establishment ofenvironments enabling
persons with disabilities
to make choices fromvarious ways of work
Employment of persons
with disabilities atprivate companies
Employment of persons
with disabilities atpublic organs

Index

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

Workshop retention rate ofpersons with mental,
development or higher brain
disabilities among people
completing job coaches’
support.

85.7%(fiscal 2016)

Workshop retention rate ofpersons with mental
disabilities among people
registered with support
centers for employment andlife of persons withdisabilities
Ratio of employment-type
teleworkers under teleworksystem, etc.

71.5%
(fiscal 2016)

7.7%(fiscal 2016)

Doubling from fiscal 2016(15.4%)(2020)

Number of persons withdisabilities employed bycompanies with workforceof 43.5 or more
Number of public organs
clearing employment rate ofpersons with disabilities

496,000 (June 2017)

585,000(fiscal 2022)

29(Note) Companies withworkforce of more than 50

2,345 (of 2,655 organs)(88.3%)(fiscal 2016)(To be set based on new
medium-term goal ofindependent administrative
body Japan Organization
for Employment of Elderly
Persons with Disabilities
and Job Seekers)
75.0(fiscal 2022)

All public organs(fiscal 2022)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Job referrals at public
employment security
officesNumber of employment
cases (persons withdisabilities) at public
employment security offices
Number of prefectures
conducting projects forpromotion of persons withdisabilities’ employment inagriculture throughagriculture-welfare tie-ups
Amount of goods andservices purchased(procurement) in priority
from facilities employing
persons with disabilities,
etc.
Average monthly wage at Btype business establishments
supporting continuation ofwork

Support for work
matching thecharacteristics ofdisabilities andsecurement of various
employment
opportunities

Programs to support forwork by persons withdisabilities in agriculture

Upgrading of welfareoriented work

Wages receivable at Btype businessestablishments
supporting continuationof work
Programs to secure
opportunities to win
orders by facilities
employing persons withdisabilities, etc.

Programs to secure
opportunities to win
orders by facilities
employing persons withdisabilities, etc.

Amount of goods andservices purchased(procurement) in priority
from facilities employing
persons with disabilities,
etc. [Reposting]30

Current figure(latest figure)414,000(cumulative total in fiscal
2012-2016)

53,3000(cumulative total in fiscal
2018-2022)

28(fiscal 2016)

All prefectures(fiscal 2018)17.1 billion yen(fiscal 2016)

Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

15,033 yen(fiscal 2015)(To be set based on fifth
welfare plans for persons
with disabilities to beprepared by local
governments, etc.)
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)

17.1 billion yen(fiscal 2016)

Target figure

9. Promotion of education
Target area
Promotion of an
inclusive education
systemSituation to grasp

Index

Utilization of individual
guidance plans andindividual education
support plans

Ratio of children, for whom
individual guidance plans
have been actually prepared,
among children, etc. in needof individual guidance plansat kindergartens, elementary
schools, junior high andsenior high schools, etc.
Ratio of children, for whom
individual education support
plans have been actually
prepared, among children,etc. in need of individual
education support plans at
kindergartens, elementary
schools, junior high andsenior high schools, etc.
Ratio of kindergartens,
elementary schools, juniorhigh and senior highschools, etc. that are set to
stipulate the provision ofreasonable accommodation
in individual guidance plans
or individual education
support plans

31

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

81.9%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

75.7%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

66% (fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)(Note) The figure represents
only education support plans.

Target area

Situation to grasp
Guidance throughspecial classes

Establishment ofsystems to promote
special needs education

Index
Number of children
receiving guidance in
special classes atelementary, junior high,senior high schools, etc.

Current figure(latest figure)
98,311(fiscal 2016)

Target figure
Increase from previous year(-fiscal 2022)(Note) The figure covers only
public elementary and juniorhigh schools. (For senior highschools, data will be collectedstarting in fiscal 2018)

Ratio of elementary schools, ―(Note) The current figure cannot
junior high and senior highbe calculated at present asschools, etc. that have
surveys have yet to start.
introduced necessary
systems and programs tooffer special needs
education.

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)(Note) Establishment of inschool committees, reality
checks, appointment of
coordinators for special needs
education, preparation ofindividual guidance plans andindividual education support
plans, stipulation ofreasonable accommodation inplans and improvement ofteachers’ expertise

Development ofeducational
environments

Improvement ofteachers’ expertise at
special schools

Ratio of teachers having
license for special needs
education at special schools

32

75.8%
(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2020)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Special schools’ exercise Ratio of schools havingof center-like roles
division of duties andsystems mainly for centerlike roles (example:
community support section,
etc.)
Promotion of support for Provision, etc. of
Ratio of universities, etc.
students with disabilities reasonable
providing coursework
in higher educationaccommodation forsupport for enrolled students
students with disabilities with disabilities
Ratio of universities, etc.
offering support, in addition
to education, for students
with disabilities
Establishment ofRatio of universities, etc.
systems for support, etc. that have prepared rules, etc.
for students withfor support for students withdisabilities
disabilities, an outline ofmeasures in relation to the
Act for Elimination ofDiscrimination Against
Persons with Disabilities,
basic policies, etc.
Ratio of universities, etc.
having officials in charge ofstudents with disabilities

33

Current figure(latest figure)Target figure

93.1%(fiscal 2015)100%(fiscal 2022)

80%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

69%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

36%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)

92.1%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)

Target area

Situation to grasp

Employment guidance
for students withdisabilities

Current figure(latest figure)

Index
Ratio of universities, etc.
have coordination sections
for preventing and settling
trouble, etc.
Ratio of universities, etc.
disclosing information on
support for students withdisabilities on their websites
Ratio of universities, etc.
providing information oninternal rules for support for
students with disabilities
and cases of support in
guidance
Ratio of universities, etc.
developing employers andproviding support for jobhunting activities forenrolled students withdisabilities.
Ratio of universities, etc.
providing information on
employment of students
with disabilities for enrolled
students with disabilities.

34

Target figure

38%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)

34%(fiscal 2016)100%(fiscal 2022)―

100%(fiscal 2022)(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present assurveys have yet to start.

21%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

23%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

Target area

Enrichment of various
lifelong learning
activities

Current figure(latest figure)

Situation to grasp

Index

Disclosure of
information on
consideration forstudents with disabilities
in entrance examinations
for universities, etc.
Lifelong learning
activities of students
with disabilities after
graduation

Ratio of universities, etc.
mentioning consideration
for students with disabilities
in examination literature80%(fiscal 2016)

Approx. 100%
(fiscal 2022)

Ratio of persons withdisabilities replying thateasy access to opportunities
for learning and sports,
cultural, and other activities
is ensured.

―(To be set based on resultsof surveys starting in fiscal
2018 and opinions byparties concerned)

35(Note) The current figure cannot
be calculated at present due tothe launch of surveys in fiscal
2018.

Target figure10. Promotion of cultural and art activities, sports, etc.
Target area

Situation to grasp

Index

Development of social
environments forenrichment of culturaland art activities

Support for cultural andart activities by persons
with disabilities

Number of organizations
adopting projects topromote and support
cultural and art activities by
persons with disabilities
Ratio of schools relying thatchildren could “nurture richspirit, sensibility andcreativity” by watchingexcellent theatrical art

Development ofenvironments forfamiliarization withsportsProvision ofopportunities forchildren at special
schools, etc. toappreciate andexperience excellent
culture and art
Diffusion of sports for
persons with disabilities
in the community

Rate of persons withdisabilities playing sports
once or more per week

Current figure(latest figure)
10 organizations(fiscal 2016)

47 organizations(fiscal 2019)89.4%(fiscal 2015)

90%(fiscal 2022)

Adults: 19.2%(fiscal 2015)
Children and young adults:
31.5%(fiscal 2015)

Adults: approx. 40%(fiscal 2021)
Children and young adults:
approx. 50%(fiscal 2021)

Target figure(Note) 7 to 19 year olds

Fostering of coaches for
sports for persons withdisabilities

Number of coaches for
sports for persons withdisabilities
Ratio of coaches for sports
for persons with disabilities
who do not have places ofactivity

36

22,000(fiscal 2015)

30,000(fiscal 2021)

13.7%(fiscal 2015)7%(fiscal 2021)

Target area
Promotion of programs
related to competitive
athletic events

Situation to grasp

Index

Fostering andNumber of gold medals at
reinforcement of athletes Paralympic Games

37

Current figure(latest figure)
Summer Games: None(2016)
Winter Games: 3(2018)

Target figure
Record number of gold
medals(Note)
Summer Games: More than 18(2020)
Winter Games: More than 13(2022)

11. Promotion of cooperation and coordination in the international community
Target area

Situation to grasp

Promotion ofinternational
cooperation via official
development assistanceNurture of people
involved in international
cooperation
Activities by persons
involved in international
cooperation

Promotion ofinternational exchanges
among persons withdisabilities

Index

Number of trainees accepted
in JICA’s activities for
persons with disabilities
Number of experts
dispatched to JICA’s
activities for persons withdisabilities
Number of volunteers in
JICA’s activities for persons
with disabilities
Implementation of
Number of technicaltechnical cooperation for cooperation projects for
persons with disabilities persons with disabilities
through JICA
Support for private
Number of projects adoptedorganizations engaging
through Grant Assistancein international
for Japanese NGO Projects
exchanges, etc.

38

Current figure(latest figure)125(fiscal 2016)11(fiscal 2016)

Target figure
More than previous year’s
level(-fiscal 2022)
More than previous year’s
level(-fiscal 2022)

122(fiscal 2016)

135(-fiscal 2022)

8(fiscal 2016)

More than previous year’s
level(-fiscal 2022)

7(fiscal 2016)

More than previous year’s
level(-fiscal 2022)