L2/21-137

ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2
PROPOSAL SUMMARY FORM TO ACCOMPANY SUBMISSIONSFOR ADDITIONS TO THE REPERTOIRE OF ISO/IEC 10646 1
Please fill all the sections A, B and C below.
TPPT

Please read Principles and Procedures Document (P & P) from http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/principles.html forguidelines and details before filling this form.
Please ensure you are using the latest Form from http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/summaryform.html .
See also http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/roadmaps.html for latest Roadmaps.
HTUUTHHTUUTHHTUUTH

A. Administrative

1. Title:

Toki Pona for Unicode

2. Requester's name:

Gabriel Tellez

3. Requester type (Member body/Liaison/Individualcontribution):

Individual contribution

4. Submission date:
5. Requester's reference (if applicable):

N/A

6. Choose one of the following:This is a complete proposal:

Yes(or) More information will be provided later:

B. Technical – General

1. Choose one of the following:a. This proposal is for a new script (set of characters):

Yes

Proposed name of script:

sitelen ponab. The proposal is for addition of character(s) to an existing block:
Name of the existing block:
2. Number of characters in proposal:
3. Proposed category (select one from below - see section 2.2 of P&P document):
A-Contemporary

B.1-Specialized (small collection)

B.2-Specialized (large collection)

C-Major extinct

D-Attested extinct

E-Minor extinct

F-Archaic Hieroglyphic or
Ideographic

G-Obscure or questionable usage symbols

4. Is a repertoire including character names provided?

Yesa. If YES, are the names in accordance with the “character naming guidelines”
in Annex L of P&P document?

Yesb. Are the character shapes attached in a legible form suitable for review?

Yes

5. Fonts related:a. Who will provide the appropriate computerized font to the Project Editor of 10646 for publishing thestandard?
Gabriel Tellez

1Form number: N4502-F (Original 1994-10-14; Revised 1995-01, 1995-04, 1996-04, 1996-08, 1999-03, 2001-05, 2001-09,2003-11, 2005-01, 2005-09, 2005-10, 2007-03, 2008-05, 2009-11, 2011-03, 2012-01)
TPPTX

b. Identify the party granting a license for use of the font by the editors (include address, e-mail, ftp-site,etc.):
u/jan-Same
6. References:a. Are references (to other character sets, dictionaries, descriptive texts etc.)
provided?

Yesb. Are published examples of use (such as samples from newspapers, magazines, or other sources)of proposed characters attached?

Yes

7. Special encoding issues:
Does the proposal address other aspects of character data processing (if applicable) such as input,presentation, sorting, searching, indexing, transliteration etc. (if yes please encloseinformation)?

NoNo
8. Additional Information:Submitters are invited to provide any additional information about Properties of the proposed Character(s) or Scriptthat will assist in correct understanding of and correct linguistic processing of the proposed character(s) or script.
Examples of such properties are: Casing information, Numeric information, Currency information, Display
behaviour information such as line breaks, widths etc., Combining behaviour, Spacing behaviour, Directional
behaviour, Default Collation behaviour, relevance in Mark Up contexts, Compatibility equivalence and otherUnicode normalization related information. See the Unicode standard at http://www.unicode.org for suchinformation on other scripts. Also see Unicode Character Database ( http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr44/ ) andassociated Unicode Technical Reports for information needed for consideration by the Unicode TechnicalCommittee for inclusion in the Unicode Standard.
HTUHUTH

C. Technical - Justification

1. Has this proposal for addition of character(s) been submitted before?

No

If YES explain
2. Has contact been made to members of the user community (for example: National Body,
user groups of the script or characters, other experts, etc.)?

No

If YES, with whom?
If YES, available relevantdocuments:
3. Information on the user community for the proposed characters (for example:
size, demographics, information technology use, or publishing use) is included?

NoReference:
4. The context of use for the proposed characters (type of use; common or rare)
Reference:rare“It’s a conlang”

5. Are the proposed characters in current use by the user community?
If YES, where? Reference:

Yes

Online conlang chats (that allow custom fonts as nether Toki Ponascript is in unicode as of now)

6. After giving due considerations to the principles in the P&P document must the proposed characters beentirelyin the BMP?

No

If YES, is a rationale provided?
If YES, reference:
7. Should the proposed characters be kept together in a contiguous range (rather than beingscattered)?

Yes!

8. Can any of the proposed characters be considered a presentation form of an existing
character or character sequence?

No

If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided?
If YES, reference:
9. Can any of the proposed characters be encoded using a composed character sequence of either
existing characters or other proposed characters?

NoIf YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided?
If YES, reference:
10. Can any of the proposed character(s) be considered to be similar (in appearance or function)
to, or could be confused with, an existing character?

No

If YES, is a rationale for its inclusion provided?
If YES, reference:
11. Does the proposal include use of combining characters and/or use of composite
sequences?
If YES, is a rationale for such use provided?
If YES, reference:

Yes?
No

Is a list of composite sequences and their corresponding glyph images (graphic symbols)
provided?

No

If YES, reference:
12. Does the proposal contain characters with any special properties such as
control function or similar semantics?

No

If YES, describe in detail (include attachment if necessary)

13. Does the proposal contain any Ideographic compatibility characters?

No

If YES, are the equivalent corresponding unified ideographic characters identified?
If YES, reference:

Here is every symbol of sitelen pona, where all symbols up to "wile" are root words and ever word after arecompound words made of a root noun and a root adjetive. This includes both Canon words and noncanon words made by speakers that are not official. (and "kijetesantakalu" that was made as a April
Fool’s joke by its maker but now has a use by some speakers of less canon dialects)(Note: that there may be other words that might be older or less common that are missing, however as
they are not in use anymore there is way less of a need for them in Unicode and they have way lessstandardization of there glyphs)