Name: Tanny O'Haley
Submission ID: 147

Questions Concerning the Proposal as a Whole
1) Completeness and clarity: Is the combined proposal complete? Each of the operational
community proposals contains aspects to be completed in the future when the proposal isimplemented. Is the combined proposal specified in sufficient detail such that it can beevaluated against the NTIA criteria?

Yes, but irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

2) Compatibility and interoperability: Do the operational community proposals work
together in a single proposal? Do they suggest any incompatible arrangements wherecompatibility appears to be required? Is the handling of any conflicting overlaps between
the functions resolved in a workable manner?

No, yes, no, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? Thewhole premise for change is unfounded.

3) Accountability: Do the operational community proposals together include appropriate
and properly supported independent accountability mechanisms for running the IANAfunctions? Are there any gaps in overall accountability under the single proposal?

No, yes, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The
whole premise for change is unfounded.

4) Workability: Do the results of any tests or evaluations of workability that were includedin the operational community proposals conflict with each other or raise possible concerns
when considered in combination?

Yes

Questions Concerning NTIA Criteria
5) Do you believe the proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model? If yes,please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe
are necessary.

No, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

6) Do you believe the proposal maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the DNS?
If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you
believe are necessary.

No, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

7) Do you believe the proposal meets the needs and expectations of the global customers
and partners of the IANA services? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why andwhat proposal modifications you believe are necessary. Please indicate if you are acustomer or partner of the IANA services.

No, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

8) Do you believe the proposal maintains the openness of the Internet? If yes, please
explain why. If not, please explain why and what proposal modifications you believe arenecessary.

No, no, and no, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required?
The whole premise for change is unfounded.

9) Do you have any concerns that the proposal is replacing NTIA's role with a governmentled or inter-governmental organization solution? If yes, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary. If not, please explain why.

Yes, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

10) Do you believe that the implementation of the proposal will continue to uphold theNTIA criteria in the future? If yes, please explain why. If not, please explain why and what
proposal modifications you believe are necessary.

No, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

Questions Concerning ICG Report and Executive Summary
11) Do you believe the ICG report and executive summary accurately reflect all necessary
aspects of the overall proposal? If not, please explain what modifications you believe arenecessary.

No, and irrelevant. What we have now works, why look for a solution that isn't required? The whole
premise for change is unfounded.

General Questions
12) Do you have any general comments for the ICG about the proposal?

This form is awful. It is not ADA compliant and does not work on mobile above poor. The proposal islooking for a solution where none is needed.