Phishing Activity Trends
Report for the Month of July, 2007
Summarization of July Report Findings► For the first time recorded by the APWG, China has surpassed the United States as the country hosting the largest
percentage of phishing websites with 23.74% of the total detected in a month’s sampling period. ► The averagetime online for phish sites descended to 3.6 days, the shortest time-live duration yet recorded by the APWG. ►The number of unique phishing websites detected by APWG in July was 30,999, a decrease of nearly 1,000 from
June. ► July saw a decrease in the number of hijacked brands to 126, a drop of 20 from June. ► The number of
unique phishing reports submitted to APWG in July was 23,917, a decrease of nearly 5,000 reports from the previous
month. ► Financial Services continue to be the most targeted industry sector at 94.4% of all attacks recorded in themonth of July. The APWG notes that more than half of the most targeted brands belong to European financial
institutions. ►The APWG continues its brand-domain pairs measurement (page 4) which combines the stats for all
monthly statistics based on brands phished, unique domains, unique URLs and the new unique domain/brand pairs
metric which counts the unique instances of a domain being used to target a specific brand.

Phishing Defined and Report Scope
Phishing is a form of online identity theft that employs both social engineering and technical subterfuge to steal
consumers' personal identity data and financial account credentials. Social-engineering schemes use 'spoofed' emails to lead consumers to counterfeit websites designed to trick recipients into divulging financial data such asaccount usernames and passwords. Hijacking brand names of banks, e-retailers and credit card companies, phishers
often convince recipients to respond. Technical subterfuge schemes plant crimeware onto PCs to steal credentials
directly, often using key logging systems to intercept consumers online account user names and passwords, and tocorrupt local and remote navigational infrastructures to misdirect consumers to counterfeit websites and to authentic
websites through phisher-controlled proxies that can be used to monitor and intercept consumers’ keystrokes.
The monthly Phishing Activity Trends Report analyzes phishing attacks reported to the Anti-Phishing Working Group(APWG) via its member companies, brandholders, Global Research Partners, the organization’s website at
http://www.antiphishing.org and emailed submissions to reportphishing@antiphishing.org. The APWG phishing attack
repository is the Internet’s most comprehensive archive of email fraud and phishing activity. The APWG additionallymeasures the evolution, proliferation and propagation of crimeware drawing from the independent research of ourmember companies. In the second half of this report are tabulations of crimeware statistics and reportage on specificcriminal software detected by our member researchers.

Statistical Highlights for July 2007
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Number of unique phishing reports received in July:
Number of unique phishing sites received in July:
Number of brands hijacked by phishing campaigns in July:
Number of brands comprising the top 80% of phishing campaigns in July:
Country hosting the most phishing websites in July:
Contain some form of target name in URL:
No hostname; just IP address:
Percentage of sites not using port 80:
Average time online for site:
Longest time online for site:

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

23917
30999
126
13
United States
20.1 %
13 %.6 %3.6 days
31 daysMethodology
APWG is continuing to refine and develop our tracking and reporting methodology. We have recently re-instated thetracking and reporting of unique phishing reports (email campaigns) in addition to unique phishing sites. An email
campaign is a unique email sent out to multiple users, directing them to a specific phishing web site, (multiple
campaigns may point to the same web site). APWG counts unique phishing report emails as those in a given monthwith the same subject line in the email.
APWG also tracks the number of unique phishing websites. This is now determined by unique base URLs of thephishing sites.
APWG is also tracking crimeware instances (unique software applications as determined by MD5 hash of thecrimeware sample) as well as unique sties that are distributing crimeware (typically via browser drive-by exploits).

Phishing Email Reports and Phishing Site Trends for July 2007
The total number of unique phishing reports submitted to APWG in July 2007 was 23,917, a decrease of nearly 5,000
reports from the previous month. This is a count of unique phishing email reports received by the APWG from thepublic, its members and its research partners.

The Phishing Attack Trends Report is published monthly by the Anti-Phishing Working Group, an industry and law
enforcement association focused on eliminating the identity theft and fraud that result from the growing problem of phishing,crimeware and email spoofing. For further information, please contact APWG Deputy Secretary General Foy Shiver at
404.434.7282. Data and analyses for the Phishing Attack Trends Report has been donated by the following companies:

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

The number of unique phishing websites detected by APWG was 30,999 in July 2007, a decrease of less than 1,000
from the month of June.

Top Used Ports Hosting Phishing Data Collection Servers in July 2007
July saw a continuationof HTTP port 80 being
the most popular port
used at 99.39% of allphishing sites reported.

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

April - July 2007 Brand-Domain Pairs Measurement
The following chart combines statistics for the last four months based on brands phished, unique domains, uniquedomain/brand pairs and unique URLs. Brand/domain pairs count the unique instances of a domain being used totarget a specific brand. Example: if several URLs targeting a brand - but are hosted on the same domain - thisbrand/domain pair would be counted as one instead of several. Forensic utility: If the number of unique URLs isgreater than the number of brand/domain pairs, it indicates many URLs are being hosted on the same domain totarget the same brand. Knowing how many URLs occur with each domain indicates the approximate number ofattacking domains a brandholding victim needs to locate and neutralize. Since Phishing-prevention technologies (likebrowser and email blocking) require the full URL, it is useful to understand the general number of unique URLs that
occur per domain.
"As we continue to see the phishers use more technical rock phish-like tactics, it is becoming increasingly important
for registrars and registries to take action against them," said Laura Mather, PhD, Senior Scientist at MarkMonitor.
"The difference between an ISP shutting down a phish site and a registrar or registry suspending the phishing domain
is substantial. When an ISP shuts down the phish site, the phisher can use another ISP to host their domain. When aregistrar or registry suspends a domain, the phisher must start over with a new domain. Action by the registrar orregistry is the one way to guarantee that the phish site is truly eradicated from the internet."

Unique URLs
Unique Domains
Unique Brand-Domain Pairs
Unique Brands
URLs per Brand

April
55643
6637
7622
174
319.79

May
37438
5967
7092
149
251.26Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

June
31709
6006
7359
146
217.18

July
30999
6005
7538
126
246.02

Brands & Legitimate Entities Hijacked By Email Phishing Attacks in July 2007
Number ofReported Brands
July 2007 saw a decrease inhijacked brands to 126.

Most Targeted Industry Sectors in July 2007
Financial Services continue tobe the most targeted industry
sector at 94.4% of all attacks inthe month of July.
“In July 2007, there was lot of
focus on the top banking
targets. About half of the major
targets are European financial
institutions,” said Dave Jevans,
Chairman, APWG. “We
continue to see the IRS and
UK tax authorities being usedas phishing lures. Thereappears to be an increase inreports of international phishingin Europe and Japan. Thereare continued low-level attacks
against a great many US credit
unions and smaller banks.”

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

Web Phishing Attack Trends in July 2007
Countries Hosting Phishing Sites
In July, Websense Security Labs saw China over take the United States as the top of the list for countries hosting
phishing websites with 23.74%. This is first time that China has surpassed the United States as the top country
hosting phishing websites. The rest of the top 10 breakdown is as follows: United States 22.93%, Japan 6.24%,
Thailand 4.44%, Venezuela 4.37%, Brazil 3.74%, Russia 3.42%, France 3.25%, United Kingdom 2.68% and Germany
with 2.38%.

PROJECT: Crimeware
Crimeware Taxonomy & Samples According to Classification in July 2007
PROJECT: Crimeware categorizes crimeware attacks as follows, though the taxonomy will grow as variations inattack code are spawned:

Phishing-based Trojans - Keyloggers
Definition: Crimeware code which is designed with the intent of collecting information on the end-user in order tosteal those users' credentials. Unlike most generic keyloggers, phishing-based keyloggers have tracking components
which attempt to monitor specific actions (and specific organizations, most importantly financial institutions and online
retailers and ecommerce merchants) in order to target specific information, the most common are; access to financial
based websites, ecommerce sites, and web-based mail sites.

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

Phishing-based Trojans – Keyloggers, Unique Variants in July

Phishing-based Trojans – Keyloggers, Unique Websites Hosting Keyloggers in July

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

Phishing-based Trojans – Redirectors
Definition: Crimeware code which is designed with the intent of redirecting end-users network traffic to a location
where it was not intended to go to. This includes crimeware that changes hosts files and other DNS specificinformation, crimeware browser-helper objects that redirect users to fraudulent sites, and crimeware that may install a
network level driver or filter to redirect users to fraudulent locations. All of these must be installed with the intention ofcompromising information which could lead to identify theft or other credentials being taken with criminal intent.
Along with phishing-based keyloggers we are seeing high increases in traffic redirectors. In particular the highest
volume is in malicious code which simply modifies your DNS server settings or your hosts file to redirect either somespecific DNS lookups or all DNS lookups to a fraudulent DNS server. The fraudulent server replies with “good”
answers for most domains, however when they want to direct you to a fraudulent one, they simply modify their nameserver responses. This is particularly effective because the attackers can redirect any of the users requests at any
time and the end-users have very little indication that this is happening as they could be typing in the address on theirown and not following an email or Instant Messaging lure.

Phishing-based Trojans & Downloader’s Hosting Countries (by IP address) in July
The chart below represents a breakdown of the websites which were classified during July as hosting malicious codein the form of either a phishing-based keylogger or a Trojan downloader which downloads a keylogger.
The United States continues to be the top crimeware hosting country with 42% of the total crimeware-spreading
websites detected during the month of July.
The rest of the breakdown in July was as follows; China 17%, Russia 15%, Brazil 9%, Italy 6%, France 6%, Germany
3%, Canada 1%, Korea 1% and Mexico with 1%.

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org

Phishing Research ContributorsdMarkMonitor

PandaLabs

Websense Security Labs

MarkMonitor is the global leader
in delivering comprehensive
online corporate identity
protection services, with a focus
on making the Internet safe foronline transactions.

PandaLabs is an international
network of research andtechnical support centersdevoted to protecting users
against malware.

Websense Security Labs mission
is to discover, investigate, andreport on advanced internet
threats to protect employee
computing environments.

For media inquiries please contact Peter Cassidy, APWG Secretary General at 617.669.1123 or
pcassidy@antiphishing.org; Cas Purdy at 858.320.9493 or cpurdy@websense.com; and Te Smith at 831.818.1267 or
Te.Smith@markmonitor.com.

About the Anti-Phishing Working GroupThe Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) is an industry association focused on eliminating the identity theft and fraudthat result from the growing problem of phishing and email spoofing. The organization provides a forum to discussphishing issues, define the scope of the phishing problem in terms of hard and soft costs and consequences, andshare information and best practices for eliminating the problem. Where appropriate, the APWG will also look to share
this information with law enforcement.
Membership is open to qualified financial institutions, online retailers, ISPs, the law enforcement community, andsolutions providers. There are more than 1700 companies and government agencies participating in the APWG andmore than 2900 members. Note that because phishing attacks and email fraud are sensitive subjects for manyorganizations that do business online, the APWG has a policy of maintaining the confidentiality of member
organizations.
The website of the Anti-Phishing Working Group is http://www.antiphishing.org. It serves as a public and industry
resource for information about the problem of phishing and email fraud, including identification and promotion ofpragmatic technical solutions that can provide immediate protection and benefits against phishing attacks.
The APWG, a 501c6 tax-exempted corporation, was founded by Tumbleweed Communications and a number ofmember banks, financial services institutions, and e-commerce providers. It held its first meeting in November 2003 in
San Francisco and in June 2004 was incorporated as an independent corporation controlled by its steering committee,
its board of directors and its executives.

Anti-Phishing Working Group
http://www.antiphishing.org ● info@antiphishing.org