JA/J05/JR2

Review of general methodology and survey procedure
under the JARPA
Shigetoshi Nishiwaki, Hajime Ishikawa and Yoshihiro Fujise
Contact email: nisiwaki@cetacean.jp
The Institute of Cetacean Research: 4-5, Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan

Abstract
The Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) has been
conducted every year since 1987/88 season. After two seasons of feasibility research, the full-scale
research started in 1989/90 season. The program is designed to repeat surveys in the Antarctic Areas
IV and V alternatively in each of the sixteen years of the research period. Area IV was divided into
five strata and Area V was divided into four strata to investigate different density of distribution andsegregation by sex and maturity of Antarctic minke whales Balaenoptera bonaerensis by regions.
Although the whole research period ranged from the end of November to March, the regular researchin the Areas IV and V was concentrated on January and February. From the 1995/96 season, the survey
area expanded into a part of Areas III and VI to improve the stock structure study. In order to achieve
four objectives of JARPA, it was characterized by combination of sighting and sampling survey. Tracklines in the Areas IV and V were designed to cover the whole research area in the same manner. In
principal, a saw tooth (right triangles) shape track line at intervals of 4 degrees longitude was settled insouth strata and a zigzag track line at intervals of 15 degrees longitude or IDCR/SOWER style wassettled in north strata. In order to obtain biological samples representing whole population in the
research area, random sampling method under the line transect sighting survey was adopted. Two or
three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) conducted sighting and sampling survey on the predeterminedtrack-line with parallel sub-track lines. A dedicated sighting vessel (SV) was introduced from 1991/92
season and the SSVs followed the SV with distance over 12n.miles to avoid influence of sampling
activity on sighting survey. One or two Antarctic minke whale(s) was sampled randomly from eachprimary sighted school within 3n.miles of the track line of each SSV. Individuals to be sampled in aschool was chosen by a researcher on board using a series of tables of random sampling numbers(TRS), which were prepared in accordance with the size of the schools. A maximum of 330 Antarctic
minke whales (300 with 10% allowance) was taken from the Area IV or V in every other season
respectively. A maximum of 110 samples (100 with 10% allowance) were added for Areas IIIE or VIW
since the 1995/96 season. Detailed biological survey was conducted to all the whales sampled on the
research base ship. Some experiments in regard to sampling method were conducted to improvemethodology of sighting /sampling survey. In parallel with lethal sampling survey, a variety of
non-lethal surveys, e.g. oceanographic survey, photo identification and biopsy sampling for large
baleen whales and prey survey, were conducted. Summary of research procedure and results in eachcruise was also described.

1. Background
The Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) has been
conducted every year since 1987/88 season. In compliance with Article VIII of the International
Convention for the Regulation of Whaling, JARPA was authorized by the Government of Japan andplanned and conducted by the Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR). After two seasons of feasibility
research in 1987/88 and 1988/89, the full-scale research started in 1989/90 season. The program wasdesigned to repeat surveys in the Antarctic Areas IV and V alternatively in each of sixteen years of theresearch period. From the 1995/96 season, the survey area expanded into a part of Areas III and VI to
improve the stock structure study (Government of Japan, 1989, 1995). The objectives of the researchwere as follows; 1) estimation of biological parameters of Antarctic minke whale Balaenoptera
1

JA/J05/JR2
bonaerensis stock, 2) elucidation of the role of whales in the Antarctic ecosystem, 3) elucidation of theeffect of environmental changes on cetaceans, and 4) elucidation of the stock structure of the Antarctic
minke whales to improve the stock management (Government of Japan, 1987ab, 1996).
In order to achieve these objectives, it was necessary to obtain unbiased biological samples
representing whole population in the research area. Therefore, JARPA was characterized by
combination of sighting and sampling survey. This paper reviews the survey procedure of JARPA withspecial reference to methodology of sighting and sampling.
2. General methodology
JARPA has been conducted under the consistent research methods during survey period. Table 1
shows an outline of all JARPA cruises from 1987/88 to 2003/04 season.
2.1. Research area and season
Main research area of JARPA was the Antarctic Area IV (70E - 130E) and Area V (130E - 170W)
south of 60S. Except for the feasibility researches, the entire area of the each Area has been surveyed
every other year. The research season was focused on the Antarctic summer season. Although thewhole research period ranged from the end of November to the middle of March, the regular researchin the Areas IV and V was concentrated on January and February, i.e. peak migration season of
Antarctic minke whales in the Antarctic Ocean (see Appendix 1).
2.2 Stratification of the area
According to results of the two feasibility researches, which suggested different density of
distribution and segregation by sex and maturity of Antarctic minke whales by regions, main researcharea in the full scale research was divided into small strata (Fig 1). Area IV was divided into two
sectors, east and west, by 100E. They were further divided into two strata, a south stratum extending
from the ice edge to a locus 45n.miles north, and a north stratum extending from the northernboundary of the south stratum to the northern boundary of the Area IV. The southern boundary of theWest-south stratum between 70E and 80E was fixed at 66S and Prydz Bay stratum was defined as thesouthern area of this boundary. Area V was divided into the east and west sectors by 165E. The west
sector was further divided into north and south strata in the same manner of the Area IV. The southernboundary of the East-north stratum was fixed at 69S and the East-south stratum (Ross Sea) was
defined as southern area of this boundary. In some research seasons, northern boundary of the researcharea was expanded to the latitudinal line between 55S and 58S based on ice condition or researchstrategy (see section 4). A Special Monitoring Zone (SMZ) was established from 1992/93 to 1994/95
season to investigate seasonal variation of whale density (see section 2.3, 3.2 and 4). Except for such
additional modifications, principal stratification manner in the Areas IV and V has been kept during all
JARPA surveys.
2.3 Design of track lines
JARPA kept the design of research track line in each stratum of the Areas IV and V with a little
modification. Fig. 2 shows the typical track line in each stratum of the Areas IV and V. It was
designed to cover the whole research area in the same manner during all JARPA surveys. Followings
are concepts of the track line design. Track lines of the feasibility researches are described in section
3.1.
1) South strata in the Area IV and the South-west stratum in the Area V
A saw tooth (right triangles) shape track line was settled at intervals of four degrees longitude.
Southern waypoints (turning points) were set on the ice-edge and northern waypoints (northernboundary) were set on 45n.miles north of them. The latitude of starting point was randomly set
at the starting longitudinal line of each south stratum.
2) North strata in the Areas IV and V
A zigzag track line was settled at intervals of 15 degrees longitude or IDCR/SOWER style(length of track line was determined by allocated days and expected searching distance per day).
2

JA/J05/JR2
Southern waypoints were set on the locus from the 45n.miles from ice-edge or northernboundary of the South strata. The latitude of starting point was randomly set at the starting
longitudinal line of each north stratum.
3) Prydz Bay in the Area IV
The Prydz Bay was divided into the north and south zones, in which a latitudinal track-line wasset respectively. These two track lines were diagonally connected and formed a z-shaped or anhourglass-shaped line.
4) South-east stratum in the Area V (Ross Sea)
Two longitudinal zigzag track lines adopted for the IDCR/SOWER were established. Lengthof the line was determined based on allocated research days and expected searching distance perday.
5) SMZ (see sections 3.2 and 4)
The track lines in the SMZ in the first two seasons were established in the same manner in the
Areas IV and V. A zigzag track line of the IDCR/SOWER style was set without stratification in
the third season.
6) Areas IIIE and VIW
In principle, a lap of eastward and westward zigzag track lines was set in the research area.
However, the design of the track line was modified in some research seasons because of a
research strategy (see section 4 and figs. 12 - 20).
2.4 Sighting survey
JARPA also kept its unique sighting and sampling method during all surveys. In order to obtain
biological samples representing whole population in the research area, random sampling method under
the line transect sighting survey was adopted.
Two or three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) conducted sighting and sampling survey on thepredetermined parallel track lines 7n.miles apart (distance between parallel lines was changed byseasons, see section 4) at a standard speed of 11.5 knots.
The survey was operated under optimal research conditions (when the wind speed was below 25
knot in the south strata or 20 knot in the north strata and visibility was over 2n.miles), which ensured
accuracy of sighting survey.
Sightings of whales were classified into primary and secondary sightings. The primary sightings
were those seen in normal searching mode (three observers searched from the top barrel of the vesselon the predetermined track-line). The secondary sightings were those seen in out of normal searchingmode (e.g. during confirming or chasing whales, no observer in the top barrel or the vessel engages inother work) or off the research time. In principle, the sighting survey by SSVs was conducted under
the limited closing mode (NSC mode: when a sighting of suspected Antarctic minke whale was madeon the predetermined track line, the vessel approached it and species and school size were confirmed).
A dedicated sighting vessel (SV) was introduced from 1991/92 season (see section 4). One of thethree SSVs was allocated as the SV from 1991/92 to 1994/95 season. An additional SV was introduced
from 1995/96 season. The sighting survey by the SV was conducted under the limited closing mode
(ASP mode; same manner as NSC without sampling of whales) and the passing mode (NSP mode;even if sighting was made on the predetermined track line, the vessel did not approach the whale
directly and searching from the top barrel was uninterrupted). The SSVs followed the SV with
distance over 12n.miles to avoid influence of sampling activity on sighting survey (fig.3).
In addition to the sightings of Antarctic minke whales or whales suspected to be Antarctic minke
whales, the SV approached large baleen whales such as blue whale Balaenoptera musculus, rightwhale Eubalaena glacialis and humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae for conducting someexperiments (see section 2.7). The SSVs also occasionally approached these whales for conductingsome experiments.
A researcher on board recorded all the sightings of whales. The sighting record includes date andtime of the sighting, position of the vessel, classification of the survey mode and the sightings
3JA/J05/JR2(primary or secondary), angle and distance from the vessel, species and school size, estimated bodylength, and etc.
2.5 Sampling method
Sampling scheme was described by Kato et al. (1989) in detail. One or two Antarctic minke
whale(s) was sampled randomly from each primary sighted school within 3n.miles of the track line by
the SSV. Individuals to be sampled in a school was chosen by the researcher on board using a series oftables of random sampling numbers (TRS), which were prepared in accordance with the size of theschools.
When the primary sighting of the Antarctic minke whales was occurred, the SSV approached to theschool of whales within 0.2n.miles. Observers on the top barrel counted a number of whales andestimated body length of each animal. If a sighting was solitary whale, it was sampled immediately
after the body length estimation. If a school was consisted of two or more animals, the researcher
assigned a serial number to each individual, ranging from left to right. The first target whale waschosen using the TRS specific to the school size. When two whales should be sampled from a school,
the second target was selected by the same manner after the first animal was sampled. In this case, theremaining individuals were renumbered according to the latest position in the school and TRS wasused for the original school size minus 1. Although JARPA was originally planed to take samples fromall primary sighted minke whales with a maximum of two whales from each school, it was reduced
two to one since 1992/93 season in order to attach greater importance to the representative of thesamples (Fujise et al., 1993b).
A maximum of 330 Antarctic minke whales (300 with 10% allowance) was taken from the Area IV
or V in every other season respectively. A maximum of 110 samples (100 with 10% allowance) wereadded for Areas IIIE and VIW since the 1995/96 season. Sampling of dwarf form minke whales wasceased from 1993/94 season because the result of genetic study revealed that two types of southernhemisphere minke whales were different each other (Government of Japan, 1993).
2.6 Biological survey
Detailed biological survey was conducted to all the whales sampled on the research base ship. Table
2 summarizes data and samples collected. These data and samples were analyzed for the objectives of
JARPA and some were used for collaborative studies in various fields such as histology, physiology,
embryology, pharmacology, pathology and reproductive physiology.
2.7 Non-lethal survey
Besides the biological survey, JARPA conducted a variety of non-lethal survey. These surveys
especially contributed to study on large baleen whales, prey species and oceanography.
2.7.1 Photo-identification and biopsy sampling
The following species were targeted for photographic record of natural markings by SV, blue,
humpback and right whales. In addition to the species targeted for photo-identification, Fin
whales Balaenoptera physalus were also targeted for biopsy sampling. Cross bows and air guns
developed by ICR (Kasamatsu et al, 1991) were used for it. These surveys were also conductedby the SSVs occasionally.
2.7.2 Prey species and oceanographic survey
SV conducted the following surveys; 1) hydro-acoustic survey using a passive acoustic
system (EK500 38kHz, 120kHz, 200kHz, SIMRAD, Norway) to elucidate distribution andabundance of prey species of Antarctic whales (since 1998/99 season), 2) consecutive measuringof surface water temperature, conductivity, surface chlorophyll, dissolved oxygen and surface
particle by Electric Particle Counting and Sizing System (EPCS, since 1999/2000 season), 3)
XBT, XCTD and CTD survey and 4) marine debris recording in the research area. All marine
debris found in the stomach of Antarctic minke whales was recorded and collected on the
research base ship.
2.7.3 Others
4JA/J05/JR2
Following experiments were conducted in several seasons; observation of behavior of blue,
fin and beaked whales, air and sea water sampling for environmental monitoring, satellite
tagging for baleen whales, acoustic monitoring for large baleen whales, and etc. Some of thesewere conducted under test stage.
2.8 Pre-determined distance a day.
The pre-determined distance per day is a task on daily movement on the research track line. It wasapplied to JARPA from 1989/90 season in order to make the survey smooth. The SSVs had to makenight steaming to the start point of next day, when they did not achieved pre-determined distanceduring the daytime (so-called “skip”). The “skip” was caused by shortage of searching distance in a
day due to bad weather condition and/or sampling activity in the high-density area of whales. It wasconcerned that the “skip” might cause biased population estimate because SSV tended to skip overhigh-density area of whales after sampling activity of a day (IWC, 1998). However, this “skip”
decreased because the survey in the Areas IV and V was conducted once in the peak migration seasonof Antarctic minke whales from 1992/93 season (see section 3.2). Since the SSVs were able to allocate
longer days in the regular research area than before, the distance of night steaming was determined ineach occasion considering the length of un-researched track line and research schedule. Therefore the“skip” in recent seasons occur mainly by shortage of research days allocated to a certain area due toprolonged bad weather condition rather than sampling activity in a day. An effect of the “skip” andadjustment on the population estimate is considered in a separated paper (Hakamada et al., 2005).
3. Experiments to improve methodology of the survey
In the JARPA cruises, some experiments were conducted to improve methodology of sighting/sampling survey. These experiments were in regard to (1) construction of track lines, (2) seasonal andspatial coverage, (3) research on neighboring area, and (4) sampling method.
3.1 Construction of track lines (feasibility researches; 1987/88 – 88/89 season)
In the two feasibility researches, the cruise track line was drawn as longitudinal line in the northernpart of research area and drawn like a trace of a billiard ball reflection in the southern part (Figs. 4 and
5). However, in the following full-scale surveys, this ‘reflection’ method (Kato et al. 1989) waschanged to zigzag line in a stratified stratum (see sections 2.2 and 2.3) to elucidate the segregation of
Antarctic minke whales in relation to their migration pattern and biological parameters (Governmentof Japan, 1989).
3.2 Seasonal and spatial coverage
Some experimental research areas were set in the Areas IV and V during the JARPA cruises. These
additional areas were principally surveyed before and /or after the regular survey of the Areas IV andV so that the regular survey in the Antarctic summer season (the peak migration period of Antarctic
minke whales) was not disturbed. Appendix 1 shows research period in each stratum by the season.
3.2.1. Twice cover of the entire Area (1989/90 – 1991/92)
From 1989/90 to 1991/92, the Areas IV and V were covered twice at different times toanalyze the changes of population density of whales by season and area (Government of Japan,
1989, 1990a, 1990b and 1991). Thus, it was found that the peak migration season of Antarctic
minke whales corresponded to the later half of the first period and the first half of the second
period of the survey covered (see Appendix 1).
3.2.2. Special monitoring zone (SMZ; 1992/93 - 1994/95)
The SMZ was established to investigate seasonal change of distribution of Antarctic minke
whales. It was set in a part of the Areas IV and V and surveyed in each before and after the
regular survey. Therefore, the SMZ was surveyed three times practically (Fujise et al. 1993b,
Government of Japan, 1993). The regular surveys in the entire Area s IV and V were conductedin the peak migration season of Antarctic minke whales.
5JA/J05/JR2
3.3 Feasibility research on neighboring area (Areas IIIE and VIW; 1995/96 - 2004/05)
Since 1995/96 season, the survey area was expanded into eastern part of Area III (Area IIIE; 35E 70E) and western part of the Area VI (Area VIE; 170W - 145W) to improve the stock structure study.
The original objective of the expansion to the Areas IIIE and VIW was a feasibility research on stock
identification to examine the hypothesis of the occurrence of more than one stock in the Areas IV and
V (Government of Japan, 1995, 1996).
3.4 Sampling method
3.4.1 Experiment to monitor whale reaction to the vesselThis experiment was conducted in order to assess the effects on sighting survey by chasing
activity of the SSV (did the sampling activity disturb other whales ahead?). One SSV surveyed
in usual manner while the other two vessels (observer vessels) drifted at a distance of 10n.miles
ahead of the SSV and 6n.miles apart from each other. The observer vessels observed reaction ofschools of Antarctic minke whales around them while the SSV conducted normal sighting
survey, chasing and harpooning (simulated harpooning was done in several experiments). The
experiment was conducted from 1990/91 to 1992/93 and 1995/96 seasons. A total of 16 sets oftrial was conducted and 69 schools of Antarctic minke whales were observed. In summary, no
obvious whale reaction to sampling activity was observed except for one case that a school
showed negative movement when the SSV approached 1.5n.miles from them (Government ofJapan, 1990b, Kasamatsu et al, 1993., Fujise et al., 1993a, 1993b, Nishiwaki et al., 1996).
3.4.2 Feasibility research of modification of sampling method (S-experiment)
During the 49th IWC Scientific Committee meeting, modification of the sighting andsampling method of JARPA was proposed (Schweder, 1998). Japan decided to conduct a limited
scale feasibility research on whether the modified method was workable or not (Government ofJapan, 1999). The feasibility research (S-experiment) was conducted in the East-south stratum in
the Area IV (1999/2000 season) and the West-south stratum in the Area V (2000/01 season).
During the S-experiment period, all SSVs stayed at the point where the survey of the day was
finished until next day. Different from the ordinal research manner, they never moved forward
without sampling survey even if it was bad weather condition. Target for sample was selectedaccording to the predetermined interval for each school size. One or two individuals werecollected from the targeted school (Ishikawa et al. 2000, Nishiwaki et al, 2001). The
S-experiment was ceased in following seasons because there were several problems in practice.
4. Outline of the research cruises
Table 1 summarizes outline of JARPA. Followings are summary of research procedure and resultsin each season. Details are described in each cruise report of JARPA (see References).
4.1. 1987/88 season (Feasibility research in Area IV, fig. 4)
The first feasibility research was conducted between 105E and 115E in the Area IV. The researcharea was divided into two strata; a southern stratum (from the pack ice edge to 60S) and a northern
stratum (from 55S to 60S). The distance between parallel track lines of two SSVs was 6n.miles.
Research period was 70 days from 17 January to 26 March 1988. Total searching effort of two SSVs
was 8,482n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 226 schools / 654
individuals. A total of 273 whales (including one dwarf minke whale) was sampled (Kato et al.
1989).
4.2. 1988/89 season (Feasibility study in Area V, fig. 5)
The second feasibility research was conducted between 168E and 180E south of 52S of the Area V.
The research area was stratified to latitudinal three strata; north (52S - 60S), middle (60S - 69S) andsouth zone (69S - ice edge). As the sampling rate of the second targeted whale in a school of two or
more was relatively low in the previous research, an additional SSV was introduced from this season.
The three SSVs were grouped into two vessels (pair) and one vessel (single), which were allocatedeach of two parallel track lines. The research period was 79 days from 12 January to 31 March 1989.
6

JA/J05/JR2
Total searching effort of three SSVs was 9,614.2n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke
whale were 340 schools / 743 individuals. A total of 241 whales (including five dwarf minke whales)
was sampled (Kato et al. 1990).
4.3. 1989/90 season (Area IV, fig. 6)
After the two feasibility researches, the full-scale research started since 1989/90 season. The entire
Area IV was divided into five strata (see section 2.2) and northern area between 55S and 60S was also
surveyed twice using longitudinal track line on the way to and from the Area IV. Northern boundary of
the West-north stratum in the first period was shifted from 60S to 58S because of extended ice edge.
Each stratum was surveyed twice. The distance between parallel three track lines was 9 n. miles aparteach other. The research period was 96 days from 6 December 1989 to 12 March 1990. Total searchingeffort of three SSVs was 17,094.4 n. miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were
767 schools / 1,978 individuals. A total of 330 whales (including three dwarf minke whales) was
sampled (Fujise et al., 1990).
4.4. 1990/91 season (Area V, fig. 7)
The entire Area V was divided into four strata (see section 2.2) and northern area between 55S and
60S was also surveyed using longitudinal track line on the way to and from the Area V. Each stratum
was surveyed twice. Track line design for IDCR/ SOWER was adapted in the South-west stratum. The
research period was 94 days from 19 December 1990 to 22 March 1991. Total searching effort of three
SSVs was 14,759.9n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 750 schools/
1,725 individuals. A total of 327 whales (including four dwarf minke whales) was sampled(Kasamatsu et al., 1993).
4.5. 1991/92 season (Area IV, fig. 8)
The northern area between 55S and 60S was surveyed using longitudinal track line on the way toand from the Area IV. Northern boundary of the West-north stratum in the first period was shifted from
60S to 58S because of extended ice edge. Each stratum was surveyed twice. One of the three SSVs (aSSV on the main course) was allocated as the SV in south strata and the Prydz Bay to improve theresearch effort. The research period was 112 days from 5 December 1991 to 25 March 1992. Total
searching effort of SV and SSVs was 18,204.5n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke
whale were 616 schools / 2,061 individuals. No Antarctic minke whale was sighted in the East-northstratum in the second period. A total of 288 whales was sampled (Fujise et al., 1993a).
4.6. 1992/93 season (Area V, fig. 9)
The SMZ survey started. It was set in the Area V between 130E and 155E south of 60S andstratified to the north and south strata in the same way as the regular research area. The research period
was 112 days from 3 December 1992 to 23 March 1993. The first SMZ survey was conducted from 3
to 25 December 1992 and the second survey was conducted from 10 to 24 March 1993 after the
regular research of the Area V (30 December 1992 -6 March 1993). Sampling method was changed totaking one whale from a school in order to achieve better representation of the whale population. Oneof the three SSVs (a SSV on the main course) was allocated as the SV in all the research areas toimprove the research effort. Total searching effort of SV and SSVs was 13,492.3n.miles and theprimary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 933 schools / 3,049 individuals. A total of 330
whales (including three dwarf minke whales) was sampled (Fujise et al., 1993b).
4.7. 1993/94 season (Area IV, fig. 10)
The SMZ in this season was set in the Area IV between 110E and 130E south of 60S andstratified to north and south strata in the same way as the regular research area. The research period
was 107 days from 3 December 1993 to 19 March 1994. The first SMZ survey was conducted from 3
to 19 December 1993 and the second survey was conducted from 5 to 19 March 1994 after the regularresearch of the Area IV (21 December 1993 -3 March 1994). One of the three SSVs was allocated as
the SV in all the research area. The SV surveyed main course and followed by two SSVs on the maincourse and a parallel sub-course 12n.miles south. Total searching effort of SV and SSVs was
17,930n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 688 schools / 1,619
7

JA/J05/JR2
individuals. A total of 330 whales was sampled. Dwarf minke whales were not targeted for sample
from this season (Nishiwaki et al. 1994).
4.8. 1994/95 season (Area V, fig. 11)
The SMZ was set in the Area V between 165E and 170W south of 60S and it was not stratified.
The research period was 109 days from 3 December 1994 to 21 March 1995. The first SMZ survey
was conducted from 3 to 17 December 1994 and the second survey was conducted from 13 to 18
February and from 15 to 21 March 1995. The regular research of the Area V was conducted from 18
December 1994 to 14 March 1995. One of the three SSVs was allocated as the SV in all the researcharea. Total searching effort of SV and SSVs was 14,038.6n.miles and the primary sightings ofAntarctic minke whale were 823 schools / 2,453 individuals. A total of 330 whales was sampled(Nishiwaki et al. 1995).
4.9. 1995/96 season (Area IV and eastern part of the Area III, fig. 12)
The first feasibility research in the Area IIIE (35E–70E, south of 60S) was conducted. A
maximum of 110 samples (100 with 10% allowance) was allocated for the Area IIIE. The research
period was 118 days from 26 November 1995 to 22 March 1996. Area IIIE was surveyed twice before(26 November - 22 December 1995) and after (5 - 22 March 1996) the regular survey of the Area IV(22 December 1995 - 1 March 1996). A new dedicated SV was introduced. The SV surveyed maincourse and the three SSVs followed on the parallel three research track lines each other (fig. 3). The
distance between parallel track lines was changed to 7n.miles. Total searching effort of the SV andthree SSVs was 21,455.5n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 893 schools/ 2,021 individuals. A total of 440 whales was sampled (Nishiwaki et al. 1996).
4.10. 1996/97 season (Area V and western part of the Area VI, fig. 13)
The first feasibility research in the Area VIW (170W–145W) was conducted. A maximum of 110
samples (100 with 10% allowance) was allocated for the Area VIW. The research period was 103 days
from 30 November 1996 to 13 March 1997. Area VIW was surveyed twice before (30 November 1996
- 4 January 1997) and after (12 - 13 March 1997) the regular survey of the Area V (4 January- 12
March 1997). Total searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was 17,755.6n.miles and the primarysightings of Antarctic minke whale were 852 schools / 2,608 individuals. A total of 440 whales was
sampled (Nishiwaki et al. 1997).
4.11. 1997/98 season (Area IV and Area IIIE, fig.14)
The research period was 99 days from 7 December 1997 to 14 March 1998. Area IIIE wassurveyed twice before (7 - 31 December 1997) and after (5 - 14 March 1998) the regular survey of the
Area IV (31 December 1997 - 9 March 1998). Total searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was
21,598.4n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 672 schools / 1,373
individuals. A total of 438 whales was sampled. The results of this season were characterized by low
density of Antarctic minke whales in the south strata and low proportion of pregnant females amongwhales collected in the south strata and the Prydz Bay in the Area IV (Ishikawa et al. 1998, Ishikawa,
2003).
4.12. 1998/99 season (Area V and Area VIW, fig. 15)
The SV equipped scientific echo sounder for a hydro acoustic prey survey. The research procedurein this season had to be changed because a fire broke out in the research base ship (NM) on the way to
the Antarctic. The NM should be repaired and the research fleet started the survey nearly two months
later than usual. The sighting survey started from 13 January 1999 and sighting/sampling survey
started from 24 January 1999 in the East-north stratum in the Area V. The research period was 103
days and the area VIW was surveyed from 17 to 31 March 1999 after the survey of the Area V (13January- 16 March 1999). Total searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was 5193.6n.miles and theprimary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 826 schools / 2,665 individuals. A total of 389
whales was sampled (Nishiwaki et al., 1999).
4.13. 1999/2000 season (Area IV and Area IIIE, fig. 16)
8

JA/J05/JR2
Northern boundary of the Area IIIE was expanded to 58S to increase the number of samples apartfrom the ice edge in the early period of feeding season of Antarctic minke whales. The research period
was 96 days from 5 December 1999 to 10 March 2000. The Area IIIE was surveyed from 5 to 26
December 1999 before the regular survey of the Area IV (27 December 1999 - 10 March 2000). Total
searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was 16,341.5n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic
minke whale were 1,507 schools / 6,581 individuals. A total of 439 whales was sampled (Ishikawa etal., 2000).
4.14. 2000/01 season (Area V and Area VIW, fig. 17)
The research period was 100 days from 11 December 2000 to 20 March 2001. The Area VIW was
surveyed from 11 December 2000 to 1 January 2001 before the regular survey of the Area V (1January- 20 March 2001). Total searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was 26,425.7n.miles andthe primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 1,881 schools / 4,903 individuals. A total of 440
whales was sampled (Nishiwaki et al., 2001).
4.15. 2001/02 season (Area IV and Area IIIE, fig. 18)
Northern boundary of the Area IIIE was expanded to 58S to increase the number of samples apartfrom the ice edge in the early period of feeding season of Antarctic minke whales. In order to improvesighting survey and hydro acoustic survey, the SV allocated 4 hours for the closing mode (ASP) and 8hours for the passing mode (NSP) a day from this season. Area IIIE was surveyed twice before (29November - 25 December 2001) and after (28 February – 8 March 2002) the regular survey of the
Area IV (25 December 2001 – 27 February 2002). The research period was 101 days from 29
November 2001 to 8 March 2002). Total searching effort of the SV and the three SSVs was
14,394.4n.miles and the primary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 1,867 schools / 4,374
individuals. A total of 440 whales was sampled (Ishikawa et al., 2002).
4.16. 2002/03 season (Area V and Area VIW, fig. 19)
Track line design for IDCR/ SOWER was adapted in the South-west stratum in the Area V. The
research period was 95 days from 2 December 2002 to 8 March 2003. The Area VIW was surveyedfrom 3 December 2002 to 1 January 2003 before the regular survey of the Area V (5 January - 8 March
2003). Total searching effort of the SV and three SSVs was 18,126.2n.miles and the primary sightingsof Antarctic minke whale were 2,461 schools / 6,583 individuals. A total of 440 whales was sampled(Nishiwaki et al., 2003).
4.17. 2003/04 season (Area IV and Area IIIE, fig. 20)
Area IIIE was surveyed from 30 November to 23 December 2003 before the survey of the Area IV(26 December 2003 – 3 March 2004). The research period was 95 days from 30 November 2003 to 3
March 2004). Total searching effort of the SV and the three SSVs was 19,287.4n.miles and theprimary sightings of Antarctic minke whale were 1,092 schools / 3,256 individuals. Meanwhile a totalsighting number of humpback whales was 1,690 schools / 3,134 individuals and was overwhelmed
those of Antarctic minke whales in the Area IV. A total of 440 whales was sampled (Ishikawa et al.,2004).
References
Fujise Y, Yamamura K, Zenitani R, Ishikawa H, Yamamoto Y, Kimura K and Komaba M. 1990. Cruise
report of the research on southern minke whales in 1989/90 under the Japanese proposal to thescientific permit. Paper SC/42/SHMi25 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 1990
(unpublished).
Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Saino S, Nagano M, Ishii K, Kawaguchi S, Tanifuji S, Kawashima S and
Miyakoshi H. 1993a. Cruise report of the 1991/92 Japanese research in area IV under a special
permit for southern hemisphere minke whales. Rep Int Whal Commn 1993, 43:357-71.
Fujise Y, Zenitani R, Saino S, Itoh S, Kawasaki M and Matsuoka K. 1993b. Cruise report of the
1992/93 Japanese research under the special permit for southern hemisphere Minke whales.
Paper SC/45/SHBa12 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 1993 (unpublished).
9

JA/J05/JR2
Government of Japan 1987a. The program for research on the Southern Hemisphere minke whaleand for preliminary research on the marine ecosystem in the Antarctic". Paper SC/39/O4
presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 1987 (unpublished). 57pp.
Government of Japan 1987b. The research plan for the feasibility study on "The program forresearch on the Southern Hemisphere minke whale and for preliminary research on the marine
ecosystem in the Antarctic". Paper SC/D87/1 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee,
December 1987 (unpublished). 36pp.
Government of Japan 1989. The research plan in 1989/90 season in conjunction with note for "theprogram for the research on the Southern Hemisphere minke whale and for the preliminary
research on the marine ecosystem in the Antarctic (SC/39/O4)". Paper SC/41/SHMi13
presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 1989 (unpublished). 9pp with Annex.
Government of Japan 1990a. The 1990/91 research plan of whale resources in the Antarctic. Paper
SC/42/SHMi9 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, July 1990 (unpublished). 13pp.
Government of Japan 1990b. Response to the resolution for reconsideration on the Japanese research
program in the Antarctic. Paper RG/VJH/18334 circulated to the commissioners andcontracting governments of IWC, November 1990 (unpublished). 35pp.
Government of Japan 1991. The 1991/92 research plan of whale resources in the Antarctic. Paper
SC/43/Mi19 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 1991 (unpublished). 5pp.
Government of Japan 1993. Reconsideration on Japanese 1993/94 research plan of whale resourcesin the Antarctic. The paper circulated to the commissioners and contracting governments of
IWC, October 1993 (unpublished). 9pp.
Government of Japan 1995. The 1995/96 research plan for the Japanese Whale Research Program
under Special Permit in the Antarctic. Paper SC/47/SH3 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, May 1995 (unpublished). 8pp.
Government of Japan 1996. The 1996/97 research plan for the Japanese Whale Research Program
under Special Permit in the Antarctic. Paper SC/48/SH3 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, 1996 (unpublished). 11pp.
Government of Japan 1999. The 1999/2000 research plan for the Japanese Whale Research Program
under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA). Paper SC/51/O5 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, May 1999 (unpublished). 5pp.
Hakamada T, Matsuoka, K and Nishiwaki, S. 2005. An update of Antarctic minke whale abundance
estimate based on JARPA data, including a comparison to IDCR/SOWER estimates.
Paper
JA/J05/PJR4 presented to the Pre-JARPA Review meeting, January 2005, Tokyo (unpublished).
Ishikawa H, Matsuoka K, Tohyama D, Yuzu S, Shimokawa T, Ohshima K, Mizushima Y, Nibe T, Kido
T, Asada M, Nakamura M, Ichinomiya D and Kinoshita T. 1998. Cruise report of the Japanesewhale research program under a special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) area IV and easternpart of area III in 1997/98. Paper SC/50/CAWS8 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee,
1998 (unpublished).
Ishikawa H, Murase H, Tohyama D, Yuzu S, Otani S, Mogoe T, Masaki T, Kimura N, Ohshima T,
Konagai T, Asada M, Takeuchi J and Kinoshita T. 2000. Cruise report of the Japanese whale
research program under special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) area IV and eastern part of area
III in 1999/2000. Paper SC/52/O20 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 2000
(unpublished).
Ishikawa H. 2003. Relationship between ice condition and number of sightings of Antarctic minke
whales – comparison between 1997/98 and 2001/2001JARPA surveys in Area IIIE and IV.
Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex G, Appendix 6, J. Cetacean Res. Manage.
5(SUPPL.):278-282.
Ishikawa H, Otani S, Mogoe T, Kiwada H, Tohyama D, Yoshida T, Hayashi T, Nagamine M,
Fukutome K, Koyanagi T, Fujihira T, Sasaki T, Ishihara T and Mori M. 2002. Cruise report of
the Japanese whale research program under special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) area IV andeastern part of area III in 2001/2002. Paper SC/54/O18 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, 2002 (unpublished).
Ishikawa H, Otani S, Kiwada H, Isoda T, Tohyama D, Honjo K, Hasegawa A, Terao T, Kushimoto T,
Ohshima T, Sugiyama K, Sasaki T, Itoh S, Takamatsu T and Yoshida T. 2004. Cruise Report of
the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) Area IV
10

JA/J05/JR2
and Eastern Part of Area III in 2003/2004. Paper SC/56/O12 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, 2004 (unpublished).
IWC. 1998. Report of the Intersessional Working Group to Review and Results from Special Permit
Research on Minke Whales in the Antarctic, Tokyo, 12-16 May 1997. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn,
48, 377-411.
Kasamatsu F., Iwata S. and Nishiwaki S. 1991. Development of biopsy skin sampling system for fastswimming whales in pelagic waters. Rep. Int. Whal. Commn 41. 555-557.
Kasamatsu F, Yamamoto Y, Zenitani R, Ishikawa H, Ishibashi T, Sato H, Takashima K and Tanifuji S.
1993. Report of the 1990/91 southern minke whale research cruise under scientific permit inarea V. Rep Int Whal Commn 1993, 43:505-22.
Kato H, Hiroyama H, Fujise Y and Ono K. 1989. Preliminary report of the 1987/88 Japanesefeasibility research of the special permit proposal fir southern hemisphere minke whales. Rep Int
Whal Commn 1989, 39:235-248.
Kato H, Fujise Y, Yoshida H, Nakagawa S, Ishida M and Tanifuji S. 1990. Cruise report andpreliminary analyses of the 1988/89 Japanese feasibility research of the special permit proposal
for southern hemisphere minke whales. Rep Int Whal Commn 1990, 40:289-300.
Nishiwaki S, Ishikawa H, Itoh S, Matsuoka K, Yuzu S, Nagatome I, Yamagiwa D, Murase H, Tanifuji
S, Miyakoshi H and Ono K. 1994. Report of the 1993/94 cruise of the Japanese whale research
programme under special permit in the Antarctic area IV. Paper SC/46/SH15 presented to the
IWC Scientific Committee, 1994 (unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Ishikawa H, Itoh S, Shimamoto K, Mogoe T, Kawazu H, Machida S, Yamane T, Ono K
and Ohkoshi C. 1995. Report of the 1994/95 cruise of the Japanese Whale Research Programme
under Special Permit (JARPA) in the Antarctic area V. Paper SC/47/SH5 presented to the IWC
Scientific Committee, 1995 (unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Ishikawa H, Tohyama D, Kawasaki M, Shimamoto K, Yuzu S, Tamura T, Mogoe T,
Hishii T, Yoshida T, Hidaka H, Nibe H, Yamashiro K, Ono K and Taguchi F. 1996. Report of the
1995/96 Japanese whale research programme under special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) inarea IV and eastern part of area III. Paper SC/48/SH12 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, 1996 (unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Niimi Y, Itoh S, Shimamoto K, Abe H, Yuzu S, Shimokawa T, Miyashita S, Taguchi F,
Kasai H, Kinoshita T, Iwata T, Sano K and Tanabe K. 1997. Report of the 1996/97 Japanesewhale research program under special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) in area V and westernpart of area VI. Paper SC/49/SH10 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 1997
(unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Daisuke T, Yuzu S, Bando T, Watanabe M, Kitajima A, Takeda S, Murase H, Otose S,
Okubo J, Tsutsui S, Takatsuki M and Kinoshita T. 1999. Cruise report of the Japanese whale
research program under a special permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) area V and western part ofarea VI in 1998/99. Paper SC/51/CAWS10 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, 1999
(unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Ishikawa H, Narita H, Otani S, Kiwada H, Kariya T, Yoshimura I, Takamatsu T, Teraoka
T, Shiozaki M, Abe N, Okamura S, Yasui K and Mori M. 2001. Cruise report of the Japanese
Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Antarctic (JARPA) Area V and westernpart of Area VI in 2000/2001. Paper SC/53/O11 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee,
2001 (unpublished).
Nishiwaki S, Tohyama D, Mogoe T, Murase H, Yasunaga G, Mori M, Yoshida T, Fukutome K,
Machida S, Ogawa R, Oka R, Ito S, Konagai T, Isoda T, Mori Y, Iwayama H and Horii N. 2003.
Cruise report of the Japanese whale research program under special permit in the Antarctic(JARPA) area V and western part of Area VI in 2002/2003. Paper SC/55/O6 presented to the
IWC Scientific Committee, 2003 (unpublished).
Schweder, T. 1998. A proposed modification for the JARPA sighting and sampling protocol. Reportof the Scientific Committee, Annex U. Rep. int. Whal. Commn 48:298.

11

Table 1. Outline of the JARPA. △: a part of the Area IV or V was surveyed. Entire Area x2: the Area IV or V was surveyed twice. SMZ: special monitoringzone was surveyed before and after the entire area survey. Expanded area: the Area IIIE or VIW survey was added to the regular survey. NM: researchbase ship, SSV: sighting and sampling vessel, SV: sighting vessel.
No

SeasonExperimentRESEARCH AREA
IIIE

1

1987/88

Feasibility

2

1988/89

Feasibility

3

1989/90

Entire Area x2

41990/91

Entire Area x2

5

1991/92

Entire Area x2

6

1992/93

SMZ

7

1993/94

SMZ

8

1994/95

SMZ

9

1995/96

Expanded area

10

1996/97

Expanded area11

1997/98

Expanded area

12

1998/99

Expanded area

13

1999/2000

Expanded area

14

2000/01

Expanded area

15

2001/02

Expanded area

16

2002/03

Expanded area

17

2003/04

Expanded area

IV

V

VIW

△
△
○
○
○
○
○
○
○

○
○

○
○

○

○
○

○

○

○
○

○

○

○
○

○

Research period (days)○

Research vessel
NM

SSV

SV

1988.1.17 – 1988.3.26

(70)

1

2

1989.1.12 – 1989.3.31

(79)

1

3

1989.12.6 – 1990.3.12

(97)

1

3

1990.12.19 – 1991.3.22 (94)13

1991.12.5 – 1992.3.25 (112)

1

2

1

1992.12.3 – 1993.3.25 (113)

1

2

1

1993.12.3 – 1994.3.19 (107)

1

2

1

1994.12.3 – 1995.3.22 (110)

1

2

1

1995.11.26 – 1996.3.22 (118)

1

3

1

1996.11.30 – 1997.3.13 (103)

1

3

1

1997.12.7 – 1998.3.14

(98)

1

3

1

1999.1.13 – 1999.3.31

(78)

1

3

1

1999.12.5 – 2000.3.10

(97)

1

3

1

2000.12.11 – 2001.3.20 (100)

1

3

1

2001.11.29 – 2002.3.9 (101)

1

3

1

2002.12.2 – 2003.3.8

(96)

1

3

1

2003.11.30 – 2004.3.3

(94)

1

3

1

12

Sample number (dwarf minke whale)
IIIE

IV

V

VIW

273

273 (1)241

241 (5)330

330 (3)327

327 (4)

288

288
330

330 (3)

330

330
330

110

440

60

330
110

330
330

389
439
440
440

330
110

440
438

330
110

110

328
329

109

330

330
330

110

Total

110

440
440

Table 2.

Example of data and samples collected by biological survey on the research base ship in JARPA.

DATA
Photographic record of external character
Body length and sex identification
Measurement of external body proportion
Body weight
Body weight by total weight of parts
Skull measurement (length and breadth)Standard measurement of blubber thickness (five points)
Detailed measurement of blubber thickness (14 points)
Mammary gland; lactation status and measurement
Breadth measurement of uterine horn
Testis and epididymis weight
Weight of stomach content in each compartment
Photographic record of fetus
Fetal length and weight
External measurements of fetus
Number of ribs
Craniometric study
Gross pathological observation

Subject
All
All
All
All
1 per dayAllAll
1 per dayAll females
All females
All malesAll
All fetuses
All fetuses
All fetusesAll
2 per season
All

SAMPLES

Subject

Diatom film record and samplingAll
Serum sample for physiological study
All
Earplug and tympanic bone for age determination
All
Baleen plates for age determination and morphological study
All
Vertebral epiphyses sample for physiological study
All
Ovary
All females
Histological sample of endometrium and mammary gland
All females
Milk sample for chemical analysis
Lactating females
Histological sample of testis and epididymis
All males
Testis and epididymis stamp smear for sperm detection
All males
Tissue samples for genetic study
All including fetuses
Tissues and stomach contents for heavy metal analysis
All
Tissues and stomach contents for organochlorine analysis
All
Tissues and stomach contents for lipid analysis
1 per dayStomach contents for food and feeding study
All
External and internal parasites
All
Fetus in early stage
AllSk]eleton for educational exhibition
Occationally13

Fig.1.

Research area of JARPA (Area IIIE, Area IV, Area V and Area VIW) showing small strata.

Fig.2.

Concept of the design of research track lines in JARPA.

Fig3. Allocation of the SV and the three SSVs. The research base ship follows SV and SSVs not to affectsighting and sampling survey.

14

Fig.4. Research track line in the 1987/88 feasibility research in the part of Area IV (Kato et al. 1989).

15

Fig.5. Research track line in the 1988/89 feasibility research in the part of Area V (Kato et al. 1990).

16

Fig.6. Research track line in the 1989/90 season in the Area IV. Upper represents the first period and lower
represents the second period (Fujise et al. 1990).

17

Fig.7. Research track line in the 1990/91 season in the entire Area V. Upper represents the first period andlower represents the second period (Kasamatsu et al. 1993)
18

Fig.8.

Research track line in the 1991/92 season in the entire Area IV. Upper represents the first period
and lower represents the second period (Fujise et al. 1993a)19

Fig.9.

Research track line in the 1992/93 season in the entire Area V with SMZ. Upper figures represent
the SMZ survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the regular survey of the entire research area
(Fujise et al. 1993b).

20

Fig.10. Research track line in the 1993/94 season in the entire Area IV with SMZ. Upper figures represent
the SMZ survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the regular survey of the entire research area
(Nishiwaki et al. 1994).

21

Fig.11. Research track line in the 1994/95 season in the entire Area V with SMZ. Upper figures represent
the SMZ survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the regular survey of the entire research area
(Nishiwaki et al. 1995).

22

Fig.12. Research track line in the 1995/96 season in the Area IIIE and Area IV. Upper figures represent the
Area IIIE survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the Area IV survey (Nishiwaki et al. 1996).

23

Fig.13. Research track line in the 1996/97 season in the Area VIW and Area V. Upper figure represents the
Area VIW survey conducted before and after the Area V survey (Nishiwaki et al. 1997).

24

Fig.14. Research track line in the 1997/98 season in the Area IIIE and Area IV. Upper figures represent the
Area IIIE survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the Area IV survey (Ishikawa et al. 1998)

25

Fig.15. Research track line (SSVs) in the 1998/99 season in the Area VIW and Area V (Nishiwaki et al.
1999)

Fig.16. Research track line in the 1999/2000 season in the Area IIIE and Area IV (Ishikwa et al. 2000)

26

Fig.17. Research track line in the 2000/01 season in the Area VIW and Area V (Nishiwaki et al. 2001).
Fig.18. Research track line in the 2001/02 season in the Area IIIE and Area IV. Upper figures represent the
Area IIIE survey conducted before (left) and after (right) the Area IV survey (Ishikawa et al. 2002).
27

130E

140E

150E

160E

170E

180

170W

160W

150W

140W

60S

65S

70S

: Pack line

75S

: Main (SV and SSV)

: Sub (SSV)80S

Fig.19. Research track line in the 2002/03 season in the Area VIW and Area V (Nishiwaki et al. 2003).

Area III

60S

70S

40E

50E

60E

70E

Area IV

60S

SV

ANTARCTICA

70S
70E

80E

90E

SSV

100E

110E

120E

130E

Fig.20. Research track line in the 2003/04 season in the Area IIIE and Area IV (Ishikawa et al. 2004).

28

Appendix 1a.

Research period of each stratum by the research season in the Area IV and the Area IIIE. Shaded area represents research in theentire Area IV in the peak migration period of Antarctic minke whales. TR; research on transit line, PRZ; Prydz Bay.

Nov
1989/90

DecemberT
West-SouthR

1991/92

TR

1993/94

EastSouth

1995/96

WestSouth

2001/02
2003/04

WestNorthEast-South

West-North

EastNorth

III-E

February

EastNorth

March

PR
Z

WestNorth

EastSouth

East-North TR

East-South West-SouthPRZ

WestNorthEast-SouthPRZ

West-North

EastNorth

WestSouth

East-North

East-South

East-South

East-North

West-South

West-South

West-North

EastNorth

PRZ

East-North

East-South

III-E
PRZ

1997/98
1999/00

January

III-E
III-E
III-E

West-North
West-North
West-North

East-South

East-North

East-North
East-South

East-North

East-South

East-North

East-South

West-South

III-E

West-South PRZ

West-South

PRZ

III-E
PRZ

III-E

West-North

29

West-South

W
S

T
R

Appendix 1b.

Research period of each stratum by the research season in the Area V and the Area VIE. Shaded area represents research in theentire Area V in the peak migration period of Antarctic minke whales. WN; West-North stratum, WS; West-South stratum.

DecemberT
EastEastR
North
North
WestEast-North
North

1990/91
1992/93West-South

1994/95

East-North

1996/97

JanuaryWest-South

VI-W

WestWestEast-South East-North West-South
South
North
WestWest-North WS
East-SouthSouth

West-North

East-North

1998/99
2000/01
2002/03

VI-W
VI-W

March

FebruaryE
N

East-North

E
S

West-South

West-North

East- W
North NWest-South

East-North
East-North30

East-South

West-North

East-SouthWestNorthWest- T
North R
WestWNSouth
EastNorthEast-South
East-South

VI-W

East-South
West-South
West-South

VI-W