Diverse Panelists Discussed a Road Map towards Abolition
International Symposium Hiroshima Strives for Nuclear Abolition:
Pursuing measures to energize the 2010 NPT Review Conference

Hiroshima Peace Institute (HPI) and the Hiroshima Peace Media Centerof the Chugoku Shimbun co-organized an international symposium
entitled “Hiroshima Strives for Nuclear Abolition: Pursuing measures toenergize the 2010 NPT Review Conference” at International ConferenceCenter Hiroshima on December 5, 2009, with the support of theHiroshima Peace Culture Foundation. The event began with opening
remarks from Hiroshima Mayor Tadatoshi Akiba, followed by keynote
speeches, reports by panelists, discussions between speakers andpanelists, and a presentation by a group of local middle and high school
students. The insightful and stimulating speeches and discussions wereenjoyed by an audience of more than 250 people of various generations,from high school students to senior citizens.
(Summaries of speeches, reports and discussions on Pages 2 and 3.)

This event was the second symposium co-organized by the twohost organizations, following the first one held in August 2008. The
objective was to identify major issues relating to the realization of
nuclear abolition and the denuclearization of Northeast Asia, and to
examine the role of Hiroshima and Japan prior to the Review
Conference of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to be held in New
York in May 2010. A further jointly-organized symposium will be heldin July this year which will examine the achievements and unsolved
issues following the May Review Conference.
In his opening remarks Hiroshima Mayor Akiba stated thefollowing: the chances to abolish nuclear weapons are increasing
worldwide, accelerated by US President Obama’s speech in Prague, hisleadership within the UN Security Council and his winning of the Nobel
Peace Prize. A significant paradigm shift is occurring in theenvironment surrounding nuclear weapons, war and peace. Akiba
introduced the “2020 Vision,” an action plan which is aimed at theabolition of nuclear weapons by 2020 that has been developed by the
Mayors for Peace, of which the Mayor of Hiroshima is the president.
Akiba also appealed to the audience to support the lobby for the
adoption of the “Hiroshima-Nagasaki Protocol,” a specific road map
towards nuclear abolition, during the NPT Review Conference.
The first of the two keynote speeches during the first part of thesymposium was entitled “Nuclear Zero Is a Process, Not an Event” andwas delivered by Jonathan Granoff, a lawyer, international peace activist
and President of the Global Security Institute, a US-based think tankwhich is seeking the abolition of nuclear weapons. In his speech Granoff
stated that “universal, legally verifiable elimination [of nuclear
weapons] must be our collective goal,” and that “Japan, the one country
that knows the empty face of the abyss, and an ally of the United States,
at this moment will be an extremely effective voice.” To conclude his
speech, he expressed his
appreciation to Hiroshima
for giving the world amessage of hope, faith,and energy.
The second keynote
speech was delivered byJeong Sehyun, a former
South Korean Minister ofUnification and theincumbent Vice-Chairmanof the Kim Dae-jung

Kazumi Mizumoto

Peace Center. In his speech entitled “The North Korean Nuclear Issueand ‘A World Without Nuclear Weapons’” Jeong posited that the US
and Japan have misinterpreted the real intention behind North Korea’s
adherence to the nuclear card, that being its attempts to guarantee thesurvival of the regime. Jeong stated that the Obama administration
should i) give the first priority to the nuclear issue and separate it fromothers such as the abduction issue; ii) hold a summit between the US
and North Korea at the earliest possible stage; and iii) adopt an active
policy towards North Korea such as guaranteeing the survival of theNorth Korean regime and initiating normalization negotiations in orderthat North Korea will abandon its nuclear weapons.
The second part consisted of three panel presentations, the firstgiven by Yoshiki Mine, a Senior Research Fellow at the Canon Institutefor Global Studies and a former ambassador who has served as the headof the Japanese delegation to the Conference of Disarmament in Geneva
and the Japanese representative for Japan-North Korea Normalization
Talks, among other posts. In his presentation entitled “Nuclear NonProliferation and Agendas for President Obama,” Mine stated that unless
the US withdraws the option of carrying out a “nuclear attack on North
Korea” and guarantees the survival of the North Korean regime, nosolution will be found for the North Korean nuclear issue. He alsoemphasized the humanity-violating illegality and immorality of the useof nuclear weapons, thereby, stressing the importance of imposing a banon the use of nuclear weapons prior to eliminating them (i.e. nuclear
abolition).
Next, Arthur Binard, a Japanese-resident American poet, gave apresentation entitled “Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A View from the
Ocean.” Since moving to Japan in 1990, Binard has been writing poems,
essays and picture books through which he expresses his anti-nuclear
messages. During the time he was investigating the Lucky Dragon
Incident of 1954, he came to the conclusion that the crew of the Lucky
Dragon were not simply victims of a thermonuclear test, but were
“heroes” who explained to the world the reality of nuclear tests throughmanaging to return to Yaizu port, despite being pursued by personnel
from the US Department of Defense who were trying to cover up theincident. Likewise, Binard emphasized that hibakusha (victims of theatomic bombing) in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are in fact not victims but“victors.”
The third presenter was Akira Tashiro, Executive Director of theHiroshima Peace Media Center, Chugoku Shimbun, whose presentation
entitled “Nuclear Weapons Can Be Eliminated: Reports from the Field”
introduced the long-running series of the same title from the newspaper.
Following that, Yumi Kanazaki, one of the correspondents at the media
center in charge of the series, described her firsthand experience of news
gathering in the US. She stated that “My speculation that we are made tobelieve in the effectiveness of nuclear deterrence without knowing it
became a conviction.”
The third part of the symposium provided opportunities for the
speakers and panelists to hold discussions on topics such as the abolitionof nuclear weapons, the denuclearization of Northeast Asia, and theroles of civil society, Hiroshima and Japan. There was also apresentation by two high school students representing the “No Nuke
Network Hiroshima,” a group of local middle and high school students,
who introduced their activities that are appealing to US President
Obama to visit Hiroshima.
Associate professor at HPIContents＜International Symposium＞ Hiroshima Strives for Nuclear Abolition: Pursuing measures to energize the 2010 NPT Review Conference
Kazumi Mizumoto … 1−3＜Reflections from Hiroshima＞ Vol. 13 Hideyuki Ohmura, Founding Chairman of the Cultural Youth League of Hiroshima ……………… 4−5
HPI Lecture Series for Citizens of Hiroshima (Second Term 2009) “Rethinking Modern German History” …………………………………………… 6
New publications from HPI…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7
Diary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8

Visit HPI’s website at http://serv.peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/English/index.htm

1International SymposiumPart Ⅰ

Keynote speeches

Nuclear Zero Is a Process, Not an Event
Jonathan Granoff, President of the Global Security Institute
The people of Hiroshima and all of Japan have a moral right and duty to lead the world to a safer place. Now thepeople of America have a president courageous enough to affirm that the US has a moral duty to work to achieve
the security of a world free of nuclear weapons. We must bring these aspirations into action.
The current system in place to keep proliferation in check is inequitable, discriminatory and thus unstable.
Universal, legally-verifiable elimination must be our collective goal. Perpetual, extended nuclear deterrence
prevents progress on deep irreversible cuts in arsenals and the achievement of a diminishing role for theseweapons. With respect to the shared security interests of Japan and the US, including the threats that are being faced from North Korea, thesecan be amply met without nuclear weapons. Japan, the one country that knows the empty face of the abyss, and an ally of the United States,
at this moment can be an extremely effective voice. A Northeast Asian Nuclear Weapon Free Zone, proposed by Foreign Minister Katsuya
Okada, has the possibility of being established quite quickly. No first use pledges for all nuclear weapon states should be supported strongly.
There are several routes to achieve a nuclear weapons free world. The best route is to embody in law the norm against any use and toconclude a convention banning the use of nuclear weapons, which builds verification, monitoring, dismantlement of nuclear weapons in any
nuclear state and all the other threat-reducing steps into a cooperative, law-governed process.
I thank the people of Hiroshima for giving us a message of hope, faith, energy, and a call for us together to remember our humanity.

The North Korean Nuclear Issue and A World Without Nuclear Weapons
Sehyun Jeong, Vice-Chairman of the Kim Dae-jung Peace Center
Whether it is in regard to nuclear abolition or the success of the NPT Review Conference, the crucial factor iswhether the North Korean nuclear issue can be solved, and that simply depends on the diplomatic skills of the US.
The motive behind North Korea’s adherence to the nuclear card for the past 20 years has not been to secure
economic assistance, but to ensure the survival of the regime. However, both the Koizumi administration in Japanand the Bush administration in the US misinterpreted this fact. Nevertheless, in the September 19 Joint Statement
adopted during the Six-Party Talks in 2005, the member states recognized that what North Korea really wants is
the guarantee of its regime through the normalization of diplomatic relations. They also specified three incentives
to be offered in the case that North Korea abandons its nuclear weapons: 1) the normalization of North Korea’s diplomatic relations with the
US and Japan respectively; 2) economic and energy assistance; and 3) a peace treaty to end the Korean War.
Recently, further hope has come in the form of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s reassertion of the three conditions in November
2009, although in a slightly different order: 1) the normalization of diplomatic relations, 2) a peace treaty, and 3) economic assistance. Thisreveals that the Obama administration has now grasped the real nature of the North Korean nuclear issue.
The US policy in relation to North Korea should prioritize the nuclear issue, then hold a summit meeting at the earliest possible
convenience, where bold proposals are put forward at an early stage in negotiations. These proposals should be pledging to guarantee theNorth Korean regime, negotiating a peace treaty, and showing the US’ intention of offering “negative security assurances,” that is not to use
nuclear weapons against denuclearized, as well as non-nuclear, states. At the same time, Japan is also required to separate the nuclear issue
from the abduction issue.

Part Ⅲ

Discussions and Q&A

Panel discussions (excerpt)
Granoff: The utility of nuclear weapons at this juncture in terms of security is militarily of absolutely no value whatsoever. But the US is stillclinging to the fear-based dominance model. The issue of breaking the myth and getting to the truth is so important and here Japan can play a
big role. Japan at this moment should close the nuclear umbrella to give enormous momentum to the move towards nuclear abolition. Japan
should not be silent. In a soccer game, you play for an hour and half, but there is only maybe 15 seconds when you can shoot for the goal. Thisis the time in which you can kick for the goal.
Jeong: The honesty and reliability of Mr. Obama’s statement about “a world without nuclear weapons” is now being put to the test. Thereneeds to be a reconciliation of interest with the sector within the US that is in favor of nuclear weapons. When it comes to Japan, there can bea clue towards nuclear abolition depending on how the Hatoyama administration negotiates with the domestic conservative faction that clings
on to the “nuclear umbrella.” Similarly, A-bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki are also required to carefully consider how to address domestic
conservatives and militarists as this will influence the future course of the nuclear debate.
Mine: There are three facets to the issue when talking about the use of nuclear weapons: the non-use of nuclear weapons in the general sense,
based on the idea of illegality; the non-use of nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states; and the no first use of nuclear weapons. Amongthese, the second is also called “negative security assurance” which should be immediately put into practice. But the US rejects such a policy
and Japan supports that stance. Also, the most serious problem regarding the logic of nuclear deterrence is the fact that it is usually disregarded
that nuclear deterrence itself poses a great threat to counterparts.
Tashiro: From the standpoint of an A-bombed city, it seems that the ideas of no first use or negative security assurances can be achieved only if
policy makers of the nuclear states wish to implement them. In these circumstances, it is naturally assumed that Japan should take theinitiative. International relations notwithstanding, nuclear weapons are inhumane and immoral, at least from the perspective of ordinary
citizens. Therefore Japan should make a strong call to international society for the complete abolition of nuclear weapons. The media should
cooperate in this effort to sway public opinion and bring pressure upon the leaders in Tokyo, Washington and Moscow.
Binard: I’m very upset with the Japanese government’s backing of the US. The attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq could have been stopped if
Japan had joined France and Germany in opposing the US. The same can be said about nuclear policy: the course can be changed if Japankeeps the reins on the US. Nuclear weapons are a human creation. So why can’t they be eliminated? Even though this is essential for thesurvival of mankind, it is still not an attainable goal. Why? Because nuclear weapons bring wealth to certain people.

2

HIROSHIMA RESEARCH NEWS Vol.12 No.3, March 2010

Hiroshima Strives for Nuclear Abolition: Pursuing measures to energize the 2010 NPT Review ConferencePart Ⅱ

Panel presentations

Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Agendas for President Obama
Yoshiki Mine, Senior Research Fellow at the Canon Institute for Global Studies
The Obama administration faces various challenges in the midst of the growing moves towards nuclear disarmament. First, there will be no
settlement in the North Korean nuclear issue unless the US abandons its former policy of possible nuclear attack and shows its willingness
to guarantee the survival of the North Korean regime. The US needs to show a similar stance towards Iran: erasing the mistrust between the
US and Iran and making the promise not to resort to nuclear weapons if Iran abandons its nuclear development. In fact, the non-use of
nuclear weapons is as essential as nuclear abolition itself. The use of nuclear weapons is inhumane and therefore illegal, and it isparticularly immoral to use nuclear weapons against those states that are recognized as non-nuclear states under the NPT system. With regard to President Obama’s
statement to act towards nuclear abolition, while his pronouncement itself should be welcomed, it is still uncertain whether it is possible to actually achieve “anunequivocal undertaking to accomplish the total elimination of nuclear arsenals,” the promise which was made at the 2000 NPT Review Conference. Also it isimportant to consider the value of gaining the nuclear cooperation of India, one country which is not party to the NPT regime.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: A View from the Ocean
Arthur Binard, poet
I was repeatedly taught about the justification of the atomic bombings of Japan in the US, but I always wondered why it had to be done
twice. After I moved to Japan, I investigated the Lucky Dragon Incident. The victims of the incident are usually regarded as the victims of“death ash” from the thermonuclear test, but they are actually more than that. Having witnessed a classified US military test, the 23
members of the crew of the Lucky Dragon managed to escape from the pursuit launched by the US Department of Defense under theaccurate instruction of Captain Aikichi Kuboyama, and made their way back to Yaizu port, despite suffering from the effects of radiation
exposure. They then told the world about the reality of thermonuclear tests. They are not merely victims but rather victors, and the episodeof their tragedy is the century’s most dramatic epic poem, comparable even to Homer’s Odyssey. The stories of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
must be passed on as the stories of victors with no distortion. I believe this to be my lifework.

Nuclear Weapons Can Be Eliminated : Reports from the Field
Akira Tashiro, Executive Director of the Hiroshima Peace Media Center, Chugoku Shimbun

In February 2009, the Hiroshima Peace Media Center commenced a feature series entitled “Nuclear Weapons Can Be Eliminated.” Today
one of the three correspondents working for the series, Yumi Kanazaki, will talk about her own experiences of news gathering.

Yumi Kanazaki, correspondent for The Chugoku Shimbun

Based on news gathering abroad, last month we started a special series entitled “The Day the Nuclear Umbrella
is Folded” which focuses on contradictions in Japanese nuclear policy. Despite the growing moves towards nuclear abolition following thestart of the Obama administration, in the Truman Presidential Museum in Missouri, Truman’s home, there can be found comments praising
the atomic bombing in the visitors book, which is rather shocking. It seems that the US policy of nuclear disarmament is only a means toprevent its proliferation. The media should cover the contradiction between these phenomena and the movement for “a world without
nuclear weapons” proclaimed by the Obama administration. There have also not been enough reports about Japan, the country which has
experienced the atomic bombing, actually requesting the “nuclear umbrella” from the US. It is the public, including young people, that canchange the minds of nuclear-inclined governments. I truly hope that our work will support your thinking and actions.

Presentation by students from the No Nuke Network Hiroshima
Yuki Okada: We are running a campaign to ask people at schools and in the town to make paper cranes. Our target
is to collect over 23,000 cranes, the figure of which represents the number of nuclear weapons existing in the world
today. We will send all of these paper cranes to US President Obama as we want to invite him to Hiroshima.
Yuji Kanemori: The reason why we want President Obama to visit Hiroshima is not to extract an apology from a US
President for the atomic bombing, but rather that we want him, as a leader who can change the world, to experienceat first hand Hiroshima citizens’ strong desire for nuclear abolition and in this way strengthen his own
determination to abolish nuclear weapons.

Audience comments and Q&A
Robert Gray, former US Ambassador for Disarmament: The difference between the Bush administration and the Obamaadministration is the difference between the Dark Ages and the Renaissance. The US is now in the process of preparing a Nuclear
Posture Review. I would like Japan to support the efforts of Mr. Obama and his administration to push towards the totalelimination of nuclear weapons. For the CTBT to be ratified in the Senate, they need 66 votes. At the moment, they have about 62.
The Nobel Peace Prize awarded to President Mr. Obama is a tribute to the fact that he represents multilateral, peaceful diplomacy
and the hope for the future. We need to support his efforts strongly and firmly.
−− Is President Obama popular in the United States?
Granoff: The birth of the Obama administration represents the fact that the global
thinking has caught on among American citizens and the President is indeed popular.
But nuclear weapons are very difficult psychologically for Americans to deal with.
That’s one of the reasons why Japan and Hiroshima are so important. You have so much to teach the world.
−− Isn’t the US military industry making money by developing nuclear weapons?
Granoff: According to one study, the United States alone has spent 5.7 trillion dollars on the nuclear arsenal so far,and about 50 billion dollars last year. On the other hand, the IAEA has never spent more than 120 million dollars
in a year for all of its inspections.
−− Should priority be put on the North Korean nuclear issue over its human rights issue?
Jeong: It is by no means correct to say that the human rights issue can be overlooked. Nevertheless, the United States needs to accept that priority has to be puton the nuclear issue in order to achieve “a world without nuclear weapons.” A peace treaty between South and North Korea, the US and China to end the
Korean War will lead to the denuclearization of North Korea.
（Summarized by Kazumi Mizumoto）
Visit HPI’s website at http://serv.peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/English/index.htm

3

＜Reflections from Hiroshima＞Vol. 13

Passing on the History ofA-bombed and Occupied Hiroshima

By Motofumi Asai,
President of HPI

Hideyuki Ohmura, Founding Chairman of
the Cultural Youth League of Hiroshima

Hideyuki Ohmura, having been in Hiroshima and exposed toradiation at the time of the atomic bombing, was a pioneering
figure in passing on testimonies about Hiroshima at the center of acircle of young intellectuals in the city. He talked about his uniqueexperiences during Hiroshima’s “lost decade” which immediately
followed the 1945 atomic bombing.
Ohmura divides his life into four “movements” as in music:
Movement I, from his birth until the atomic bombing; Movement
II, the subsequent five years when he was active in Hiroshima;
Movement III, from his return to his native Fukuyama when he wasinvolved in the local Taiyo- Shimbun newspaper and a golf society;and Movement IV, a long fight against A-bomb-derived multiple
cancers until today. In the present interview, Ohmura talked mainly
about the first two movements, some episodes of which have also
appeared in his columns “Golfing Chat” and “Golfing Chat 2”
which he contributed to The Taiyo- Shimbun over 500 times.

＜Movement Ⅰ＞
Although my real birthday is December 1922, it is registered as
January 1923. This was because of my parents’ intention to
postpone my selection for conscription by a year. This trick was
rather common at the time. I studied at Seishikan Secondary
School, the Hiroshima Teachers College, and then Hiroshima
Bunrika University (the present day Hiroshima University).
Having passed the selection process for conscription in 1945, I
was always concerned about when the conscription notice would
arrive. However, time passed with no letter arriving in my post box,
and it was already August. Everyone was wondering why there had
been no air raids in Hiroshima, and there was even a rumour thatthe city might be attacked by some special means.
On August 5, 1945, the day before the bombing, I went backhome to Fukuyama, about 100 kilometers east of Hiroshima, tocollect some food. I was going to return to Hiroshima on the sameday, but three circumstances allowed me to avoid direct exposure toradiation. The first of these was that I had had my bag stolen at
Hiroshima Station, so I went back to Fukuyama two hours later
than originally planned. The second was that, while at home in
Fukuyama, my friends gathered at my house, therefore I postponed
my return to Hiroshima until the next morning so that I would
arrive in Hiroshima at 8 a.m. on August 6. The last circumstance
was the terrible train delay that occurred on the morning of August
6 after air raids in Ashiya (300km east of Hiroshima) that took
place the night before. I was originally to leave Fukuyama at 4a.m., but the train actually departed after 6 a.m. When the bomb
was dropped at 8:15, I was still seven stations away from
Hiroshima, and after about 20 minutes the train reached Kaita, threestations before Hiroshima, where everyone was asked to get off.
These three circumstances determined my destiny.
From Kaita Station I walked all the way through the Danbara
4

HIROSHIMA RESEARCH NEWS Vol.12 No.3, March 2010

area to Ujina. There was absolutely nobody around who was notinjured. With so many dead bodies everywhere, my emotions
seemed to become cauterized so that I no longer felt anything when
I saw them. I reached my friend’s house in Ujina, took a rest there,
then went to my university in the city once all the fires had started
to die down. When I reached the city center, it was already getting
dark. That night I stayed at a dormitory belonging to Toyo Kogyo(the present day Mazda). The following day I went to the city
center again to look for my friends. I was still in Hiroshima when
Fukuyama was attacked in air raids that took place on August 8.
The next day, I went back to Fukuyama, and then returned toHiroshima again to learn of the second atomic bombing on
Nagasaki the same day.
On August 15, I went by train to Shobara to go shopping witha specially-issued return ticket which set the condition that one
could travel to any destination but had to return to Hiroshima. It
was in Shobara that I learned of Japan’s surrender through theEmperor’s radio broadcast. To be honest, my memories up to thesurrender are rather scarce. I returned to Fukuyama in September
and it was then that symptoms of A-bomb disease started to appear:
epilation, bleeding gums and mild fever. But fortunately they did
not threaten my life.

＜Movement Ⅱ＞
I returned to Hiroshima the following October. Schools anduniversities were shut down all over the country so there werestudents of Tokyo, Kyoto, Waseda and other universities who were
temporarily back home in Hiroshima. They were mostly studying
pure science since they, unlike those studying the humanities andsocial sciences, did not go to the battlefield but stayed in the
country to work in the war industry. We got together and were
motivated to take some action in the city where it had been said thatno plant would grow for the next 75 years. We formed the Cultural
Youth League of Hiroshima in December 1945, with me as thefounding chairman. Our aim was to pass on testimonies about thefirst nuclear destruction in human history -- the most tragic event of
the 20th century -- to later generations both in and outside
Hiroshima.
The first idea we came up with for this was to organize
phonograph record concerts and public lectures, but we had to startwith absolutely nothing -- no electricity, no radio, nothing at all.
Therefore we collected phonographs from all over the city andrepaired them to start a series of concerts in January 1946. We alsoorganized public lectures, inviting such big names as thephilosopher Masakazu Nakai, the writer Tomoe Yamashiro, thehistorian Goro- Hani and the physicist Yoshio Nishina. Some league
members even formed a theater society with external supporters
and gave public performances. All of the expenses for these
activities were covered by money collected by the members

themselves. Looking back, I wonder how on earth it was possible tocollect all the money.
At the time, there were also other projects initiated by themembers. One example was of a motivated primary school teacher
Tsuyoshi Nakamoto whose attempt to have his students write down
their experiences of “that day” led to the widely known book
Genbaku no Ko (Children of Hiroshima), a collection of memoirsof local children, which was edited by Arata Osada and publishedin October 1951. Another was the publication of our own periodical
Tankyu- (Quest) which, along with discussion meetings, functioned
as a forum for exchanging opinions and experiences on the day of
the atomic bombing.
I joined the Communist Party in November 1945. It was
popular among university students to join the party, but I was alsostrongly encouraged to join by the party members themselvesbecause of my active involvement in the Youth League. I
remember one student of Waseda University who recommended me
to join the party was a so-called “Marx boy,” which meant someone
who was merely a doctrinaire. Within the party, I was appointed theeditor of its newspaper The Hiroshima Minpo-.
One of the major events in which I participated while I was aparty member was the Congress of Partisans for Peace held in
Hiroshima on October 2, 1949, which was characterized by the firstdeclaration on nuclear abolition in Japan that was proclaimed
during the event. The congress took place at Hiroshima Jogakuin
Junior High School as part of the International Day of Struggle for
Peace called by the World Federation of Trade Unions. The
declaration was drafted by the poet Sankichi Toge, discussed as an“urgent issue,” and approved unanimously. It declared that “We as
citizens of Hiroshima, the first city to experience the disaster
caused by the Atomic Bomb, shall stand up for the abolishment of
atomic bombs.” The aforementioned Hiroshima Minpo- reported it
on its first page with the title “Ban atomic bombs: A message from
Hiroshima citizens to the world.” Nevertheless, there was nochance of the event becoming widely known across Japanesesociety due to the censorship imposed by the US occupation forces.
On April 6, 1950, we formed the first cross-party peace
movement group in Hiroshima, the Society to Facilitate theHiroshima Committee of Partisans for Peace. On June 9 of thesame year, another “first” attempt was made: publishing a special
issue featuring photos of the post-bombing disaster. It was printed
as the seventh issue of the weekly journal of the local branch of theCommunist Party, Heiwa Sensen (Peace Front Line), and the coremessage of the issue was “No more A-bombs: All patriots, come tothe peace front line.” The chief editor was me, the photos were
provided by a photographer at the Chugoku Shimbun, Mr.
Matsushige, and a poem entitled August 6 was contributed by Toge.
Forty thousand copies were distributed across the country. I
remember Toge and I prepared ourselves for probable censorship,especially when the publication represented the first reporting of
the atomic bombing ever made in Japan.
As a result of the publication, I got arrested, despite my careful
wording in the journal to avoid censorship. The actual charge thatthe police brought against me was that I had printed the issue inquestion at an “underground printing house.” The charge was soon
dropped and I was released after 22 days of detention.
Nevertheless, both Heiwa Sensen and Hiroshima Minpo- werebanned on June 29.
I stayed at my friend’s house for a few days after my release.
Everyone should have known about my release, but nobody visited
me. This made me decide to leave the party.
However, this wasn’t the first time that a division appeared

between the local party leadership and me: basically we had
irreconcilable perspectives. I, as well as Tomoe Yamashiro, had
always thought that it was indispensable to live together with themasses in order to acquire perspectives from the same standpoint as
theirs. However, such an idea was overlooked by the party
leadership, so we in turn became disillusioned with the party.
The most crucial matter that led to my decision to leave theparty was the fact that at the time when the aforementioned special
issue was released, the then party leaders were not negative but
rather indifferent about the A-bomb. They did not recognize theimportance of the anti-A-bomb movement.
Even after I left the party, I was still tailed by the police. On
Christmas Day of 1951, I decided to leave Hiroshima altogether tosettle down in Fukuyama.
I got to know the poet Sankichi Toge when he became aregular participant in meetings of the Youth League. Toge, who
was born in February 1917, thus five years my senior, was alreadyin poor health when we first met. From July 1946 he served as thechairman of the Youth League for one year, succeeding me, who
had become more occupied with the activities of the Communist
Party. While Toge had been baptized because of his Christian elder
sister, he had also developed an interest in socialism, influenced byhis other elder sister and two elder brothers. His involvement in theYouth League deepened his consciousness of problems in society,and then in April 1949 he joined the Communist Party following
recommendation from me. His active involvement in the party wasevident in, for example, his serving as one of the chairpersons at the
aforementioned Congress of Partisans for Peace and drafting thedeclaration. He continued composing poems even after mywithdrawal from the party. It was a great pity to lose such a highly
motivated youth at the age of 36. (He passed away on March 10,1953.)＜Finale＞
On December 20, 1999, the Associated Press announced the 10
biggest events of the 20th century as chosen by 71 world majorpress companies from 36 countries, and it put the atomic bombingsof Hiroshima and Nagasaki first on the list, followed by the Russian
Revolution and the German invasion of Poland. Whether the peopleof Hiroshima believe it or not, the world actually does see thebombings as the biggest event of the 20th century. There is no
doubt about it. Therefore, the people of Hiroshima should send
stronger messages to the world.
As mentioned earlier, we started our activities with the aim ofpassing on the most tragic event of the 20th century as Hiroshima
citizens. But these days, all sorts of similar activities that are taking
place are little more than an extravaganza. Having observed
Hiroshima from the outside in Fukuyama since the early 1950s, I
can tell that the sphere of thought and speech in Hiroshima is in a
dysfunctional state. In fact, it has been like that for many decades -since long before the ideological split during the anti-A and H
bomb movement of the early 1960s.
At the same time, there has still been no significant selfreflection or analysis of the Pacific War. As a result, people areforgetting the horror of warfare, the horror of nuclear war andradiation and related diseases that it will cause. I want to strongly
emphasize the need to come to some sort of conclusion in relation
to the war.
(Interviewed on December 7, 2009)

Visit HPI’s website at http://serv.peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/English/index.htm

5HPI Lecture Series for Citizens of Hiroshima (Second Term 2009)

Rethinking Modern German History:
The 20th Anniversary of the Opening of the Berlin Wall
Germany celebrated the 20th anniversary of the opening of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 2009. To mark this occasion,
HPI chose modern German history as the theme for the latest Public Lecture Series.

What was Nazism?: From Weimar

Lecture 1 Democracy to Nazi Dictatorship(October 2)

Eiko Tamura, former Professor at Saga University

The theme of the first lecture was the Weimar Republic andNazism. Tamura presented a comprehensive overview of modern
German history and detailed examinations of the politics, society
and culture of the Weimar Republic. She stated that the collapseof the Weimar Republic, “the most democratic state in theworld” at that time, was brought about through “compromise”
and “coexistence” between the Nazi movement as a new mass
movement of Nazism and the traditional restoration-oriented,
authoritarian elites. She also examined the historical meanings of
the Nazi regime and anti-Semitism, and some affinities between
the political environments of the Weimar era and that of thepresent time. In this way she emphasized the importance of
carrying out investigations into the Weimar Republic andNazism in our time.

Politics of Memory: Nazism and War from

Lecture 4 the Perspective of Overcoming the Past

(October 23)

Yuji Ishida, Professor at Tokyo University

Ishida’s lecture examined public memories of Nazism andWWⅡ and their political background, with a particular focus on
the issue of overcoming the past. According to Ishida, public war
memories in East Germany mainly centered on the fight against
Nazism led by Communists and the Soviet military, whereas inWest Germany there have been various twists and turns in the
narrative, revealing that the achievement of constructing publicmemories and overcoming the past has not been as easy aprocess as is usually claimed in Japan. Ishida also stated that theovercoming of the past in Germany should not always be
attributed to support from a majority of the public, but rather tosensible decision-making on the part of politicians, thedevelopment of civic movements and the progress of historicalscholarship.

Lecture 2 The Peace Movement in West Germany(October 9)

Makiko Takemoto, Assistant Professor at HPI

The second lecture examined the peace movement in West
Germany. During the Cold War period, both East and West
Germany sought to prove their own legitimacy as “the” Germanstate based on an anti-fascist ideology. This situation led bothsides to promote “peace” and “democracy” respectively. In thiscontext, while the traditional peace movement of the pre-1945
period was inherited in East Germany, it was distanced from thatof West Germany and seen as a “Communist movement.” Thepeace movement in West Germany was thus reborn as an antinuclear movement. In the lecture, Takemoto traced thedevelopment of the post-1945 peace movement in West
Germany: from its birth in the 1950s, the Easter March protest
which started in the 1960s to the upsurge in the early 1980s
marked by the NATO Double-Track Decision. She then returnedto the change which occurred in the character of the peace
movement around the time of WWII, before concluding thelecture.

The Second Birth of West Germany: A
Lecture 3 Comparative Study of Japan and Germany(October 16)

in the 1960s

Masaaki Yasuno, Professor at Hiroshima University

The third lecture focused on West Germany in the 1960s when
the state experienced its “second birth” when the power transfer
to the Social Democratic Party occurred and democracy was
finally consolidated to create West Germany’s political identity.
Yasuno explained how the 1968 student movement significantly
weakened the traditional authoritarian character of German
politics and society, strengthened grass-roots political activities
and changed people’s lifestyles to a considerable degree. The
movement further brought about changes in the political systemand people’s mentalities which has left an irreversible influenceon West German society. Yasuno stated that these changes
represent great contrasts to the situation in Japan and are often
perceived as positive developments within Germany;
consequently, in contrast to Japan, the 1968 movement is viewed
favorably. He also addressed the condition of contemporary
Japanese politics and society, and made comparisons with thecase of West Germany.

6

HIROSHIMA RESEARCH NEWS Vol.12 No.3, March 2010

The monument in Berlin, usually known as the
Holocaust Memorial, represents the complexity ofthe process of overcoming the past.

The Unified Germany and

Lecture 5 Europe(October 30)

Peace

in

Eiichi Kido, Associate Professor at Osaka University

In the final lecture, Kido examined the issue of “peace” from theperspective of German reunification in 1990 onwards. He
focused particularly on the different ways that “peace” has been
perceived in the former East and West Germany, thelegitimatization of the activities of the Bundeswehr (the German
armed forces) outside NATO countries, and the aerial attacks
carried out in the former Yugoslavia in order to illustrate that the“no more Auschwitz” mentality has tended to overshadow the“no more war” mentality in post-reunification Germany. He also
criticized the recent trend that the ideas of “humanitarian
activities” and “human rights” have been utilized to justify thedispatch of German troops abroad, and also that more emphasis
has recently been put on “national interests” rather than on“humanitarian activities,” thus revealing that “a culture of war”
is starting to reassert its influence within the country.
As during the first term, the latest Lecture Series attracted
approximately 100 people to each of the five interesting andstimulating lectures, which were further enlivened by manyquestions from the audience. Requests from audience members
for further opportunities to explore German history and also avariety of other topics will be considered as much as possible in
the future.

Text and image by Makiko Takemoto, assistant professor at HPI

New publications from HPIEngagement with North Korea: A Viable Alternative
Edited by Sung Chull Kim and David C. Kang（State University of New York Press, 2009）
How the world deals with North Korea and its nuclear capability will have ramifications for both regional and global
stability. Engagement with North Korea: A viable Alternative, the culmination of a 2006-2008 research project
conducted under the auspices of the Hiroshima Peace Institute, examines the still controversial policy ofengagement. Through an examination of the converging and diverging policies of engagement practiced by theUnited States, China, Russia, Japan and South Korea, the contributors to this volume explore how and to what extent
engagement has achieved some measure of progress, and under what conditions this policy is likely to achievecomplete success.
The findings of this volume are as follows: (1) In order to achieve success of engagement in the multilateral context of the Six-Party
Talks, the relevant actors have to increase the level of coordination among their diverse strategies. Engagement with North Korea represents
a triple-edged phenomenon that encompasses domestic politics concerning North Korea, bilateral relations with North Korea, andmultilateral relations within the Six-Party Talks. There always exists tension between the three levels; the key point is how to prevent thiscomplexity from undercutting the positive effect of engagement. (2) The existing logic of quid pro quo will not be sufficient to convince
North Korea that full cooperation for denuclearization will best serve its national interest. In view of that there is a close linkage between
North Korea’s nuclear diplomacy and its national identity, particularly with respect to anti-Americanism, the United States needs toconstruct foundations of a peace regime on the Korean Peninsula and to facilitate the normalization of relations between the two countries.

Filling the Hole in the Nuclear Future: Art and Popular Culture Respond to the Bomb
Edited by Robert Jacobs（Lexington Books, 2010）
Art and popular culture have played an essential role interpreting nuclear issues to the public and investigating theimplications of nuclear weapons to the future of human civilization. While political and social forces often seemedparalyzed in thinking beyond the dilemma posed by this apocalyptic technology, art and popular culture wereuniquely suited to grapple with the implications of the bomb and the disruptions in the continuity of traditional
narratives about the human future endemic to the atomic age.
What Godzilla carried with him out of Tokyo Bay, and what the giant ants in Them! brought up out of thesewers of Los Angeles was a message, a message about the future. With human technological abilities far
outpacing human social abilities, if society didn’t change quickly, atomic weapons would fuel a war to end civilization. Human society was
at a fork in the road: one path led to atomic holocaust; the other led to a future of peace and plenty. This was the nuclear dilemma,
navigating past the danger and accomplishing the transformation to a new Eden.
This unique book presents a collaboration of artists and scholars exploring the issue of the response of art and popular culture to thebomb, especially in the United States and Japan. Manga, photos, poems and scholarship are woven together to present a holistic vision of
the cultural and artistic impact of nuclear weapons. This book is the outcome of an HPI Research Project funded by and conducted at HPIfrom 2006 to 2008.

Can Nuclear Abolition be Achieved?:
The course and discourse of the past decade of nuclear proliferation
By Kazumi Mizumoto（Horitsubunka-sha, 2009）This single-authored volume is the compilation of the reports that Mizumoto contributed for the past decade to theAdvisory Research Committee launched at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum in 1998. In chronological order
it examines the nuclear issues from various regions around the world, the reactions and initiatives undertaken by theUnited States and international organs, and the position and role of Hiroshima. This comprehensive analysis offers
an insightful overview of the “lost decade” of nuclear disarmament and challenges its readers to consider whether
nuclear abolition can really be achieved.

The Dragon s Tail: Americans Face the Atomic Age
By Robert Jacobs（University of Massachusetts Press, 2009）This book explores American nuclear discourse in the first half of the Cold War. It explores the “alchemical
narrative” in which nuclear weapons are seen as signifiers of impending social transformation, either the end of theworld or a world of peace and plenty. Through examinations of discourse about the nature of nuclear weapons,
radiation and survival of nuclear war, this narrative is seen to have a primary influence on American perceptions of
the bomb.

The War Crimes Trials and Japan-Philippines Relations, 1945-1953
By Hitoshi Nagai（Iwanami Shoten, 2010）
During the Second World War, some of the fiercest fighting took place in the Philippines and the atrocities
committed there by the Japanese military severely shocked the people of the country. After the war, the newlyindependent Philippines assumed a strongly anti-Japanese stance and became actively involved in issues concerning
Japanese war criminals through participating in the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal and, among other measures,
holding its own trials against war criminals. In the book The War Crimes Trials and Japan-Philippines Relations,
1945-1953, Nagai examines extensive primary sources and interviews to reveal how the Philippines has dealt withissues relating to war crimes, the commitment to which has until now remained largely unknown to the public. This
unprecedented volume sheds light on the initial phase of postwar Japanese-Philippine relations.
Visit HPI’s website at http://serv.peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp/English/index.htm

7November 1, 2009 ‒ February 28, 2010
◆Nov. 6

Kazumi Mizumoto gives lecture “The Recovery ofHiroshima from the A-bombing and Peace” to a group of teachers
from the Takéo Provincial Teachers Training College as part of theCambodia Reconstruction Support Project, co-organized by
Hiroshima Prefecture and JICA, held at Hiroshima International
Plaza in Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima Prefecture.
◆Nov. 11-12
Narayanan Ganesan presents paper “Myanmar-China
Relations: Interlocking Interests but Independent Output” at theannual congress of the Asian Political and International Studies
Association (APISA), held in Manila, the Philippines.
◆Nov. 20 Mizumoto gives lecture “To Always Have a Future
Vision” at Hiroshima Jogakuin Senior High School.
◆Nov. 28 HPI President Motofumi Asai participates as a panelist at
the 37th annual meeting of the Chugoku-Shikoku Association for
American Studies, held at Yasuda Women’s University, Hiroshima.
◆Nov. 29 Akihiro Kawakami presents paper “Key Issues of a
Locality-Oriented Peace Guarantee” at a conference of the Peace
Studies Association of Japan, held in Kyoto.
◆Nov. 30-Dec. 1 Ganesan presents paper “Comprehensive Security
and Civil-Military Relations in Southeast Asia: A Comparative
Survey” at the international conference “Comprehensive Security in
the Asia-Pacific Region” held at Keio University, Tokyo.
◆Dec. 2
Kawakami gives lecture “Local Assemblies and the Basic
Ordinances of Local Assemblies” at a public meeting of the Coalitionof Jichiro Local Assembly Members, held in Hiroshima.
◆Dec. 8
Asai gives lecture “The Situation on the Korean Peninsula
and Japan-DPRK Relations” at a public meeting, held in Kyoto.
◆Dec. 9-11
Ganesan and Sung Chull Kim organize an HPI
workshop “State Violence and Political Transition in East Asia” atthe Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.
◆Dec. 11 Mikyoung Kim presents paper “North Korean Human
Rights Policies of China and Japan: Supremacy of Domestic
Priorities over International Norms” at the annual meeting of the
Korean International Political Science Association, held in Seoul,
South Korea.
◆Dec. 12 Mizumoto gives report “An Analysis of Recent Trends
and Debates on Nuclear Weapons” at a workshop organized by theAdvisory Research Committee of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial
Museum. ▽Kawakami gives lecture “Regime Change and thePacifist Constitution” at a meeting of the National Forestry andAllied Workers Union of Japan, held in Matsumoto, Nagano
Prefecture.
◆Dec. 15-19 Ganesan takes part in the organization of a training
and capacity-building workshop for young academics, funded by
APISA and the Swedish International Development Cooperation
Agency (Sida), held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
◆Dec. 16 Motofumi Asai, Sung Chull Kim, Kazumi Mizumoto and
Makiko Takemoto hold a discussion on the current political situationin East Asia with Dr. Young Kyong Kwon and five other members
from the Education Center for Unification of the South Korean
Ministry of Unification, held at HPI.
◆Dec. 17 Hitoshi Nagai gives lecture “The Institute for American

Studies of Rikkyo University during the Second World War” at
Rikkyo University, Tokyo.
◆Jan. 1
Robert Jacobs is promoted to Associate Professor.
◆Jan. 5- 14
Ganesan conducts a field research trip to Myanmar.
◆Jan. 16 Kawakami gives lecture “The Pacifist and Welfare
Constitution and Regime Change” at a meeting of the Okayama
branch of the Co-op Labor Union, held in Okayama.
◆Jan. 21 Mizumoto gives lecture “How to Live in the International
Age: Pursuing Nuclear Abolition and International Contribution froman A-bombed City” at a seminar “Learning for Interaction with theWorld” held at Hatsukaichi-Nishi High School, Hiroshima
Prefecture.
◆Jan. 27 Mikyoung Kim participates in a seminar “Northeast Asia
and North Korea” organized by the Korea Future Foundation, held in
Seoul, South Korea.
◆Jan. 30 Mizumoto gives lecture “Japan’s Security and the US
Bases in Japan” at a New Year’s meeting of the Social Democratic
Party, Hiroshima, held at WorkPier Hiroshima.
◆Jan. 31 Mizumoto gives lecture “Cambodia: History, Civil War
and Rehabilitation” at a preparatory training course for the Study
Tour to Cambodia organized by Hiroshima International Center(HIC) and JICA Chugoku, held at HIC.
◆Feb. 11 Asai gives lecture “The DPJ Government, the JapaneseConstitution and the Japan-US Security Alliance” at the 2010 Peace
Festa organized by the Kurashiki Medical Co-op, held in Kurashiki,
Okayama Prefecture.
◆Feb. 13 Asai gives lecture “Japanese Diplomacy on the US
Military Bases in Japan” at a public meeting, held in Kudamatsu,
Yamaguchi Prefecture.
◆Feb. 13-14 Mikyoung Kim organizes an HPI workshop “Culture
and Collective Memory in Northeast Asia” in Athens, Georgia, US.
◆Feb. 13-20 Mizumoto conducts visits to Phnom Penh and Takéo
in Cambodia as a member of the Cambodia Reconstruction Support
Project, co-organized by Hiroshima Prefecture and JICA.
◆Feb. 16-20 Mikyoung Kim participates in a working group on
human rights “The Real Cost of Recession: Human Rights and theEconomic Downturn,” and another on feminist theory and genderstudies “Gender and Security: Theory and Practice” and presents
paper “South Korean Construction of North Korean Identity:
Victimization, Romanticization and Vilification” during the annual
convention of the International Studies Association, held in New
Orleans, Louisiana, US.
――Visitors――◆Nov. 10Thirty-one students from Itsukaichi-Kannon Junior HighSchool, Hiroshima.
◆Nov. 13 Eight students from the Lower Secondary School
affiliated with the School of Education, Nagoya University.
◆Dec. 16 Dr. Young Kyong Kwon and five other members from the
Education Center for Unification of the Ministry of Unification,
South Korea.
◆Dec. 21 Six students from Waseda Jitsugyo High School.

HIROSHIMA RESEARCH NEWS Vol. 12 No. 3（March 25, 2010）Copyright 2010 HPI, All rights reserved●Published by●Printed by

8

Hiroshima Peace Institute, Hiroshima City University（Editor: Yuko Takahashi）
Ote-machi Heiwa Bldg. F9/10, 4-1-1 Ote-machi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima 730-0051, Japan
Phone: +81（0）82 544 7570
Fax: +81（0）82 544 7573
E-mail: office-peace@peace.hiroshima-cu.ac.jp
Letterpress Co., Ltd.

HIROSHIMA RESEARCH NEWS Vol.12 No.3, March 2010