中尾佳行業績一覧	  （２０１４年６月現在）
I.著書・編著
1. Norman F. Blake, David Burnley, Masatsugu Matsuo，Yoshiyuki Nakao, eds. 1994.

A NewConcordance to 'The Canterbury Tales'	  Based on Blake's Text Edited from the Hengwrt
Manuscript.

University Education Press, 1994.

viii + 1008 pp.	 	 

2. Norman F. Blake, David Burnley, Masatsugu Matsuo，Yoshiyuki Nakao, eds. 1995.

A New

Rime Concordance to 'The Canterbury Tales' Based on Blake's Text Edited from the Hengwrt
Manuscript.

University Education Press.

ix + 535 pp.	 	 

3. Akiyuki Jimura, Yoshiyuki Nakao, Masatsugu Matsuo, eds.

1995.

A Comprehensive List of

Textual Comparison between Blake's and Robinson's Editions of 'The Canterbury Tales'.
University Education Press.

v + 520 pp.	 	 

4. Masahiko Kanno, Gregory K. Jember, and Yoshiyuki Nakao, eds. 1998.

A Love of Words:

English Philological Studies in Honour of Akira Wada. (“Causality in Chaucer's Troilus andCriseyde: Semantic Tension between the Pragmatic and the Narrative Domains”,

pp. 79-102を執筆。)	 	 

5. Akiyuki Jimura, Yoshiyuki Nakao, Masatsugu Matsuo, eds.

1999.

A Comprehensive	 

Textual Comparison of 'Troilus and Criseyde': Benson's, Robinson's, Root's, and Windeatt's
Editions.

University Education Press.	  vii + 298 pp. 	 	 	 6. 中尾佳行、地村彰之編、2001.	 『伝統と独創ーー菅野正彦教授退官記念論文集』英宝社、	 
333	 pp..(「ChaucerのTroilus and Criseydeにおけるambiguityの構造：読者から観た関係性の度合いの考察」pp.	 225-59を執筆。) 	 	 
7.	 2004.	 『Chaucerの曖昧性の構造』東京：松柏社.	 	 ix	 +	 451	 pp.	 
8.	 原野	  昇、水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、四反田	  想共編.	 2004.『中世ヨーロッパの時空間移動』	  渓水社,	 216pp.（「『カンタベリー物語』にみる旅――構造と意味――」）pp.	 97-140を執筆。）	 
9. 原野	  昇、水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、四反田	  想共編. 2005.『中世ヨーロッパにおける排除と寛容』	  渓水社, 178 pp.（「クリセイデ像の変容にみる排除と寛容」pp. 125-55.を執筆。）
10.水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、四反田	  想、原野	  昇、共編. 2006.『中世ヨーロッパにおける死と生』	  渓水社, 197 pp.（「「尼僧院長の話」に見る死生観――少年殉教と感覚に訴える表現」pp. 69-108.を執筆。）
11.水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、原野	  昇、共編. 2007.『中世ヨーロッパにおける女と男』渓水社, 186 pp.（「チョーサーの『善女伝』に見る女と男――女性像の曖昧性について――」pp. 75-103.を執筆。）
12. 中尾佳行、小野祥子、白井菜穂子、野地	  薫、菅野正彦編. 2007.『テクストの言語と読み――池上惠子教授記念論文集――』英宝社, vii + 497 pp. (“Exclusion and Tolerance inCriseyde/Cresseid/Cressida.” pp. 262-82 を執筆。)
13.水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、原野	  昇共編. 2008.

『中世ヨーロッパにおける笑い』渓水社, 182 pp. (「チョーサーのファブリオに見る笑い―「船長の話」における言葉遊び再考―」pp. 111-42を執筆。）
14.Akiyuki Jimura, Yoshiyuki Nakao, and Masatsugu Matsuo, 2008.

“The General Prologue” toThe Canterbury Tales: A Comprehensive Collation of the Two Manuscripts (Hengwrt andEllesmere) and the Two Editions (Blake (1980)) and Benson (1987)) of The Canterbury Tales.
広島大学大学院文学研究科論集、第68巻特号, vi + 62 pp.
15. Nakao, Yoshiyuki Nakao, Maaatsugu Matsuo and Akiyuki Jimura. eds. 2009.

AComprehensive Textual Collation of ‘Troilus and Criseyde’: Corpus Christi College, Cambridge,
MS 61 and Windeatt (1990). 専修大学出版局.

Senshu University Press.

xvi + 420 pp.

16. 水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、原野	  昇共編. 2009.『中世ヨーロッパにおける伝統と革新』(「トパス卿の話」に見る伝統と刷新―ロマンスの言語の解体と創造」
pp. 135-64.を執筆。)	 
17.秋元実治編. 2010年.『Comment Clauseの史的研究――その機能と発達――』英潮社フェニックス. (「ChaucerのComment clause――認識・思考動詞の主観化とテクストの読み」pp.
51-80を執筆。)	 
18.水田英美、山代宏道、中尾佳行、地村彰之、原野	  昇共編. 2010.『中世ヨーロッパの祝宴』渓水社, 175 pp.（「ガウェイン詩人とチョーサーに見る祝宴と罠」pp. 116-44を執筆。）	 19. Osamu Imahayashi/Yoshiyuki Nakao/Mihciko Ogura. eds. 2010.

Aspects of the History ofEnglish Language and Literature: Selected Papers Read at SHELL 2009, Hiroshima.
Internatiler Verlag der Wissenschaften: Peter Lang, ix + 407 (“Chaucer’s Ambiguity in Voice.”
pp, 143-57を執筆)	 

20. 2013. The Structure of Chaucer’s Ambiguity. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 309 pp.
21. Yoshiyuki Nakao and Yoko Iyeiri, eds. 2013.

Chaucer’s Language: Cognitive Perspectives. Studies

in the History of the English Language, 2013-B.	  The Japanese Association for Studies in theHistory of the English Language. Osaka Books Ltd., 151 pp. (“Progressive Diminution in ‘SirThopas’.” pp. 47-77を執筆。)	 
II.	 論文	 
1. 1983.	 「英詩の多変量解析の試みーーBlakeとChaucerを例として」（松尾雅嗣との共著）
桝井迪夫先生退官記念『英語英文学研究』研究社出版.

pp. 83-92.	 	 

2. 1984.「関係構造と統語的変異－チョーサーの’of-phrase’再考」1984.

山口大学『英語と英米文学』19, pp. 1-28.	 	 

3. 1985.「チョーサーにおけるアレゴリーとリアリズム」 広島大学英文学会 『英語英文学研究』(Hiroshima Studies in English Language and Literature)29 （アレゴリー特集号）、
pp. 15-26.	 	 

4. 1985.「語彙の近接度と文学作品への適用例―The Merchant's Taleを例として」（松尾雅嗣との共著） 広島大学英文学会『英語英文学研究』(Hiroshima Studies in EnglishLangauge and Literature)29,pp. 49-58.	 	 
5. 1988.「チョーサーの曖昧性の用法―selyの曖昧性について」 松元寛先生退官記念『英米文学語学研究』英宝社. pp. 401-7. 	 	 6. 1988. “Chaucer's Verbal Ambiguities--Towards a Systematic Approach.”

広島大学英文学会『英語英文学研究』(Hiroshima Studies in English Language and Literature) 32, pp. 54-64.	 	 

7. 1988. “Chaucer's Ambiguity in The Legend of Good Women.”

ERA (The English Research	 Association of Hiroshima) 6, No.1, pp. 14-49.	 	 

8. 1988. 「"A Little Cloud"を読む－Joyce の言語の重層性の問題」 山口大学『英語と英米文学』23, pp. 29-42.	 	 

9. 1991. “The Language of Romance in Sir Thopas --Chaucer's Dual Sense of the Code.”
Language and Style in English Literature--Essays in Honour of Michio Masui, Ed., MichioKawai,The English Research Association of Hiroshima, Eihosha. pp. 343-360. 	 	 10. 1992「パーソナル・コンピュータによるSir Thopasの言語の計量的研究」 『英語英文学
研究とコンピュータ』 斉藤俊雄編、英潮社.	 pp. 177-94.	 	 

11. 1993. “'Chaucer's Discourse Ambiguity in Troilus and Criseyde: Book V 1009-50.”

河井迪男

先生退官記念『英語英文学研究』湯浅信之編、英宝社.	 pp. 45-52.	 	 

12. 1993. “The Ambiguity of the Phrase As She That in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde.”

Studiesin Medieval English Language and Literature 8, The Japan Society for Medieval English	 Studies, pp. 69-86.	 	 

13. 1994. “A Note on the Affectivity of Criseyde's pite.” Poetica 41, Shubun International, pp.
19-43.	 	 

14. 1995. “A Semantic Note on the Middle English Phrase As He/She That.” NOWELE(North-Western European Language Evolution) 25, Odense University Press, Denmark,pp. 25-48.	 	 
15. 1996. “Descriptive Notes on Paired Words in the Language of Caxton's Own Prose.” (WithMidori Matsutani) 『山口大学教育学部研究論叢』、第46巻、第1部、pp. 35-48.	 	 

16. 1996.「英語法助動詞：must, have got to, have to―文法化・主観化の観点から―」（平山直樹との共著） 山口大学『英語と英米文学』31, pp. 38-68.	 	 

17. 1997. “Social-Linguistic Tension as Evidenced by Moot/Moste in Chaucer's Troilus andCriseyde.” Essays on English Literature and Language in Honour of Shun'ichi Noguchi, ed.
Masahiko Kanno, et al., Eihosha, pp. 17-34.	 	 

18. 2000.「Chaucerのmoot/mosteの意味論：外的要因の未分化性」『言語研究の潮流―山本和之教授退官記念論文集』大庭幸男編、開拓社.	 pp. 231-46.	 	 

19. 2000.「ChaucerのTroilus and Criseydeにおける「声」のambiguity」『虚構と真実―14世紀イギリス文学論集』都留久夫編、桐原書店.pp. 133-44. 	 	 20. 2000. “'Notes on the Did Do + Infinitive Construction in Late Middle English: with Special
Reference to the Writings of Caxton.” (With Midori Matsutani).

広島大学英文学 会『英語英文学研究』(Hiroshima Studies in English Langauge and Literature) 44, pp. 93-106.	 	 
21. 2001.「英語教師に求められる専門性―英文法におけるメタ言語意識を例に」『中国地区
英語教育学会研究紀要』No. 31, pp. 105-114.	 	 
22. 2002. “The Semantics of Chaucer's Moot/Moste and Shal/Sholde: Conditional Elements andDegrees of Their Quantifiability.” English Corpus Linguistics in Japan, ed. Toshio Saito, Junsaku
Nakamura, and Shunji Yamazaki. Rodopi, pp. 235-47.	 	 

23. 2002. “Modality and Ambiguity in Chaucer’s trewely: A Focus on Troilus and Criseyde.’
Yoko Iyeiri and Margaret Connoly eds.

And gladly wolde he lerne and gladly teche: Essays

on Medieval Enlgish to Profesor Matsuiji Tajima on His Sixtieth Birthday. Tokyo:Kaibunsha, pp. 73-94.	 

24. 2003. 「つなぎの重要性――英語教師に求められる専門性」『英語教育学研究』金田道和先生退官記念論文集.	  渓水社. pp. 85-102.	 
25. 2003. 「英語教師に求められる専門性(2)―文法化と主観化を例に」. 『英語と英語教育』,
8, pp. 63-71.	 
26.Yoshiyuki Nakao, Akiyuki Jimura and Masatsugu Matsuo. 2004.

“A Project for aComprehensive Collation of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales:
The General Prologue.”Junsaku Nakamura, Nagayuki Inoue and Tomoji Tabata ed. English

Corpora under Japanese Eyes.

Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi, pp.139-50.	 
27. 2004. “Chaucer’s Semely and Its Related Words from an Optical Point of View.”

Osamu

Imahayashi and Hiroji Fukumoto ed. English Philology and Stylistics: A Festschrift forProfessor Toshiro Tanaka. Hiroshima: Keisuisha, pp. 24-40

	 28. 2005. “Chaucer’s Gentil with a Focus on Its Modal Implication.” Jacek Fisiak and Hye-KyungKang, ed. Recent Trends in Medieval English Language and Literature in Honour of Young-Bae
Park Vol. I. Seoul: Thaehaksa, pp. 321-45.	 
29. 2006「学習英文法の構築：相の場合」『英語と英語教育	  特別号』広島大学学校教育学部英語研究会、pp.26-26.	 
30. 2006. “The Interpretation of Troilus and Criseyde 3.587: ‘syn I moste on yow triste.’”MichikoOgura ed. Textual and Contextual Studies in Medieval English—Towards the Reunion ofLinguistics and Philology. Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature (Edited byJacek Fisiak 13).
31. 2006.
etc.)”.

Peter Lang, pp. 51-71.

“The Structure of Chaucer’s Ambiguity with a Focus on Modal Discourse (Tr 5.1084,
English Language and Linguistics No. 21.

Journal of the English Linguistics Societyof Korea, pp. 181-219.
32. 2007. “Tension between the Semantic and the Pragmatic Affecting the Word Sad in the Clerk’sTale.” Mayumi Sawada, et al. ed. Language Beyond—A Festschrift for Hiroshi Yonekura on theOccasion of His 65th Birthday, Tokyo: Eichosha, pp. 337-51.
33. 2008. 「Chaucer の言語とテクストの読み―言語の主観化(subjectification)をめぐって―」The 80th General Meeting of The English Literary Society of Japan 24-25 May, 2008	  （第 80 回大会 Proceedings）, 日本英文学会，pp. 185-7.	 
34.Yoshiyuki Nakao, Akiyuki Jimura and Masatsugu Matsuo, 2009.

“A Project for aComprehensive Collation of the Two Manuscripts (Hengwrt and Ellesmere) and the Two
Editions (Blake [1980]) and Benson [1987]) of The Canterbury Tales.

Hiroshima Studies inEnglish Language and Literature, Vol, 53, pp. 1-22.
35. Yoshiyuki Nakao, Akiyuki Jimura and Masatsugu Matsuo, 2009.

“Positions of Ornamental

Letters within a Word in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of Geoffrey Chaucer’s The
Canterbury Tales.

『松尾雅嗣教授退職記念論文集	  平和学を拓く』IPSHU研究報告シ

リーズ、研究報告, No.42, 広島大学平和科学研究センター、pp. 384-99.	 	 
36. 2009.「Chaucerの言語とメトニミー―Troilus and Criseydeの場合―」渡部眞一郎・細谷行

輝編『英語フィロロジーとコーパス研究――今井光規教授古稀記念論文集――』松柏社, pp. 413-26.
37. 2010. 「Chauccerのcomment clause――韻律と意味の融合――」『近代英語研究』第26号,近代英語協会, pp. 71-78.
38. 2010.「英語教師に求められる専門性――教育的文体論の構築――」小迫	  勝・瀬田幸人・
福永信哲・脇本恭子編『英語教育への新たな挑戦――英語教師の視点から――』英宝社,
pp. 77-89.
39. 2011. “Chaucer’s Language: ‘Subjectivisation’ and ‘Expanding Semantics.”

SIMELL (Studiesin Medieval English Language and Literature) No. 25, The Japan Society for Medieval EnglishStudies, pp. 1-41.
40. 2011. 「Chaucerのtrewelicheに見る主観性と読み」The Conference Organizing Committee ed.
JELS (Papers from the Twenty-Eighth Conference of The English Linguistic Society of Japan
November 13-14, 2010).

The English Linguistic Society of Japan, pp. 117-23..

41. 2011. “Textual Variations in Troilus and Criseyde and the Rise of Ambiguity.”
Tomonori Matsushita, A.V.C. Schmidt and David Wallace, eds. From Beowulf toCaxton: Studies in Medieval Languages and Literature, Texts and Manuscripts. Bern:Peter Lang, pp. 111-50.
42. 2011. “A Comprehensive Textual Comparison of Troilus and Criseyde: Corpus ChristiCollege, Cambridge, MS 61 and B.A. Windett’s Edition of Troilus and Criseyde (1990).”(with Masatsugu Matsuo). Tomonori Matsushita, A.V.C. Schmidt and David Wallace, eds. From Beowulf to Caxton: Studies in Medieval Languages and Literature, Texts andManuscripts. Bern: Peter Lang, pp.151-64.
43. 2011. 「「トパス卿の話」における音と意味―ロマンスの解体と再構築―」日本英文学会
第 83 回大会 Proceeding. The 83rd General Meeting of the English Literary Society of Japan
21-22 May 2011 (付	  2010 年度支部大会 Proceedings)	  日本英文学会 2011 年 9 月 23 日発行、pp. 111-113.
44. 2012. “Truth and Space in Chaucer: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach.” Studies in Modern
English. No. 28 , Modern English Association (Kindai Eigo Kyokai), pp. 23-49.

45. 2014.” Linguistic Differences Between the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of The
Canterbury Tales: The Multifunctions of the Adjectival Final –e and the Scribe’s Treatments.”
STUDIES IN MODERN ENGLISH: The Thirtieth Anniversary Publication of the Modern
English Association, pp. 69-84.

	 III.書評	 1.

1989. Robert M. Jordan: Chaucer's Poetics and the Modern Reader. University of California
Press, 1987. viii + 182 pp．『英文学研究』LXVI, No.2, pp. 331-35.	 	 

2.

1988. Ebbe Klitgard: Chaucer's Narrative Voice in 'The Knight's Tale’. University ofCopenhagen, Museum Tusculanum Press, 1995. 111 pp.『英文学研究』LXXV, No.1, pp.
144-50.

3. 2002. Yoko Iyeiri, Negative Constructions in Middle English. Kyushu University Press, 2001, xx+ 232 pp. 『英語青年』５月号（増大号）, pp. 70-1.
4. 2003. Peter Brown, ed., A Companion to Chaucer. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers . 2000. xvii +515. Studies in Medieval English Language and Literature, No. 18. The Japan Society forMedieval English Studies, pp. 64-70.	 
5. 2008. Laurel J. Brinton and Elizabeth Closs Traugott.

Lexicalization and Language Change.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005 xii + 207. 『近代英語研究』第24号、近代英語協会、pp. 85-91.
6. 2011. Edward I. Condren, Chaucer from Prentice to Poet: The Metaphor of Love in Dream
Visions and Troilus and Criseyde.

Gainseville: University Press of Florida, 2008. xiv + 240 pp.

Studies in English Literature, English Number 52, The English Literary Society of Japan, pp.
168-74.	 
7. 2013. 米倉	  綽編著『ことばが語るもの―文学と言語学の試み』英宝社、 2012, iv + 271 pp.
『英文学研究』Vol. XC, December, pp. 144-49.