Business Process Re-engineering in Ethiopia
Berihu Assefa/May 2009
I prepared a short note on ‘Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) in Ethiopia’ as per therequest of Prof. Keinichi Ohno. His request in one of his emails to me reads as follows:“At this time, if you have time, can you ask around and check how Ethiopia is
implementing Business Process Re-engineering (BPR)? This is an American
idea but most donors seem to use it. It appears that BPR is quite popular inEthiopia for public sector reform (not so much for private firms). Can you
find exactly what they mean by BPR in Ethiopia, and what concrete
procedures are taken (maybe a few examples) to improve the public sector?
Is there any case where BPR is applied to private firms?”
I.

BPR: Concept

Business process reengineering (BPR) began as a private sector technique to helporganizations fundamentally rethink how they do their work in order to dramatically improvecustomer service, cut operational costs, and become world-class competitors. A key stimulus forreengineering has been the continuing development and deployment of sophisticated information
systems and networks. The Business Process Reengineering method (BPR) is the fundamental
reconsideration and radical redesign of organizational processes in order to achieve drastic
improvement of current performance in cost, services and speed (Hammer, 1990; Thomas H.
Davenport and J. Short, 1990; Hammer and Champy, 1993). Their claim was simple: most of thework being done does not add any value for customers, and this work should be removed, notaccelerated through automation. Instead, companies should reconsider their processes in order tomaximize customer value, while minimizing the consumption of resources required fordelivering their product or service.
A FIVE STEP APPROACH TO BUSINESS PROCESS REENGINEERING
Davenport (1992) prescribes a five-step approach to the Business Process Reengineeringmodel:
1.
Develop the business vision and process objectives: The BPR method is driven
by a business vision which implies specific business objectives such as cost reduction,time reduction, output quality improvement.
2.
Identify the business processes to be redesigned: most firms use the 'highimpact' approach which focuses on the most important processes or those that conflict
most with the business vision. A lesser number of firms use the 'exhaustive approach'that attempts to identify all the processes within an organization and then prioritize themin order of redesign urgency.
3.
Understand and measure the existing processes: to avoid the repeating of old
mistakes and to provide a baseline for future improvements.
4.
Identify IT levers: awareness of IT capabilities can and should influence BPR.
5.
Design and build a prototype of the new process: the actual design should not
Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009Page 1

be viewed as the end of the BPR process. Rather, it should be viewed as a prototype,with successive iterations. The metaphor of prototype aligns the Business Process
Reengineering approach with quick delivery of results, and the involvement andsatisfaction of customers.
II. What exactly is BPR in Ethiopia? What concrete procedures are taken to improve
the public sector?
As soon as the current government came to power, it started rigorous reforms (first phasereforms from 1991 to 1995) in three fronts:
Economic reform – from central planning to market economy
Political reform – federalism, and power and fiscal decentralization
Constitutional reform – enacting the Ethiopian constitution
The question was whether Ethiopia has a bureaucracy that is capable of doing thesereforms or not. The government employed private domestic and foreign consultants to study theimplementing capacity and effectiveness of the bureaucracy. The consultants identified that
Ethiopian bureaucracy is characterized by•••

 Very hierarchical with many non-value adding works/positions/staffs
 Nepotism and lack of transparency and accountability, and corruption)
 Lack of leadership capacity Input based and not output based – i.e. output not measured.
It was difficult to undertake reform with this bureaucracy. The consultants recommended theestablishment of new institutions. The “Ministry of Capacity Building” with the mandate ofundertaking reforms in all public institutions (esp. education and the civil service) wasestablished. Also “Anti-corruption Commission” with the mandate of avoiding unaccountableand untransparent procedures in public institutions was established.
Over time it was believed that an important condition to undertake the reforms was toimplement BPR. It was identified that to solve the problems of hierarchical bureaucracy withmany non-value adding works/staffs/positions, nepotism, etc; BPR is seriously implemented in
all public institutions gradually. The reason why the Ethiopian government adopted BPR is thatthe current system has to be completely changed and redesigned and BPR can do this job.
Services delivered by the public institutions are characterized by Long time taking
 Costly (high transaction cost) Incompetence (not up to the needs of customers)
 Not responsive (many complaints, questions, comments etc from customers but noresponse) Not dynamic (the world is changing but our public institutions are stagnant)People have choices when they buy products from private firms. However, government services
are one (no choice). At the same time it is people’s democratic right to get appropriate andsatisfactory services from public institutions. As a result of the implementation of BPR, painfulpractices in each public office were identified, and many non-value adding works/positions areavoided. For example, it was found that deputy head departments were actually doing nothing.
Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009Page 2

At the end of the day BPR enables a ‘one stop shop mechanism” – where customers get all
public serves in one place at low cost.
So far BPR is implemented in public offices and publicly owned big institutions such as“the Ethiopian Telecommunication Corporation”, “The Ethiopian Power Corporation” andgovernment banks. However, private firms have not adopted it yet in Ethiopia.

III. Examples of Improved service Delivery: Making Public Institutions Transparent,Efficient and Effective
The experiences of the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI), the Ethiopian InvestmentCommission, and the Ethiopian Customs Authority are instructive examples of how institutions
can be transformed to be more responsive, efficient and effective. These three public institutions
were taken as good examples in the IMF Country Report No. 06/27 for Ethiopia (2006). By wayof highlighting the major achievements of the implementation of the Civil Service Reform
Program, the following are worth noting:a) The Ethiopian Investment Commission: It used to take 18 steps and 25 days on
average for an individual business person to secure an investment license, where as now
after the conduct of Business Process Reengineering (BPR) by the Commission it only
takes an individual 4 steps and 2 days to get his/her investment license. The same service
used to take 39 steps and 108 days for a company where as now (after BPR) it only takes
4 steps and 2 days. Securing main registration certificates used to take 18 steps and 28
days for an individual businessperson before the BPR where as now it only takes 4 steps
and 2 days. The same service used to take 39 steps and 96 days for a company, whereas
now it takes the steps and time as the individual business to secure registration
certificates.
b) The Ministry of Trade and Industry (MOTI): It used to take 14 working steps(processes) and two and a half days to secure a trade license for an individual businessperson where as now (after the Ministry conducted BPR), it now only takes a businessperson 6 work steps and 34 minutes to get a trade license.This same service used to take acompany 26 working steps and 35 days. After the conduct of the BPR, it only takes thesame work steps and time as an individual business (6 work steps and 34 minutes,respectively).
c) The Ethiopian Custom Authority: Securing loading permits from Djibouti used to take43 work steps (processes) and 2 days where as after the Authority has been re-organized
and undertook BPR, it only takes 6 steps 15 minutes to get the service. Checking andfixing a container with a customer seal used to take 8 steps and two days before the BPR,
whereas now it only takes 3 steps and 40 minutes to get the same service. Declaration
acceptance, approval, examination, release of exported items and distribution ofdeclaration used to take 8 steps and 2 to 15 days, where as now it only takes three steps
and 26 minutes to get same service for a business entity.

Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009

Page 3

Figure 1. Work Flow of Licensing Activities in License and Registration Department (LRD,MOTI)

Source: Progress report. Office of Civil Service Reform Program Feb 2005
Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009

Page 4

Figure 2. Workflow of Registration Activities in License and Registration Department(LRD, MOTI)

Source: Progress report. Office of Civil Service Reform Program Feb 2005

Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009

Page 5Officials and resource persons in MOTI explained that the license and registration
Department (LRD) is estimated to serve more than 20,000 clients a year and provides 31 types ofLicensing and Registration services. Moreover, as the figures above show, apart from reducing
unnecessary work chains, BPR has reduced the amount of time it takes for users to receive
services, thereby inhibiting the scope for corruption.
As indicated in Figure 1, before the introduction of BPR, a client had to go through 14
steps and had to wait for at least eight days to get his/her license. Apparently the steps have been
reduced to only six and the average time reduced to only 39 minutes. Likewise, as indicated infigure 2, before BPR a client had to go through 16 steps and had to wait for two days on average
to get trade names registered. After BPR, the steps have been reduced to six and the average time
has been reduced to 34 minutes. This is a spectacular reduction in work process and time in theLicensing and Registration services. This is an indication of the extent to which this particulardepartment of MOTI had been operating inefficiently in the past. This inefficiency had also
contributed to an unfavorable legal-business environment in Ethiopia and pinpoints hurdles thebusiness community had been confronting for years. BPR has apparently brought untold
satisfaction on the part of the clients. To get rid of the lengthy processes involved, clients used tobribe clerks and some unit heads to get things done. This process has successfully closed thedoor for malpractices and corruption ingrained in the system over many years.

References•Common, K. Richard and Hailemariam, Getachew (2006), Civil service reform in
Ethiopia: Success in two ministries.

•Davenport, Thomas & Short, J. (1990), The New Industrial Engineering: Information
Technology and Business Process Redesign, in: Sloan Management Review, Summer
1990, pp 11-27•

Hammer, Michael (1990), Reengineering Work: Don’t automate, obliterate, Harvard
Business Review, Jul/Aug 1990, pp 104-112•

Hammer, Michael and Champy, James (1993), Reengineering the Corporation: A
Manifesto for Business Revolution.

•IMF (2006), the federal democratic republic of Ethiopia: Poverty reduction strategy paper– 2003/04 Annual progress report. IMF country report No. 06/27

Berihu Assefa G.

May 2009

Page 6