List of Tables
Table 1-1
Table 1-2
Table 1-3
Table 2-1
Table 2-2
Table 2-3
Table 2-4
Table 3-1
Table 3-2
Table 3-3
Table 3-4
Table 4-1
Table 4-2
Table 5-1
Table 5-2
Table 5-3
Table 5-4
Table 5-5
Table 5-6
Table 6-1
Table 7-1
Table 7-2
Table 8-1
Table 8-2
Table 8-3
Table 8-4
Table 8-5
Table 9-1
Table 9-2

Page
Policy Menu for Enhancing Industrial Human
Resource and Enterprise Capability··························· 7Japan: Policy Dialogue with Developing Countries (Selected List) ·· 8Issues Discussed at High Level Forums ······················ 13
Timeframe of the KAIZEN Project ·························· 25
Positive Results Observed in Some Pilot Companies ············ 26
Grade Point Distribution ·································· 27
Assessment of Capacity Development of KU Members ·········· 28
GTP’s Visions, Objectives and Strategic Pillars ················ 39
Selected GTP Targets for the Industrial Sector ················· 45
Success Factors of National Movements ······················ 59National Movements: Country-specific Factors ················ 60
Thailand: Specialized Institutes ····························· 93
Zambia: Action Plan Matrix Format for the Triangle ofHope Project (Example) ·································· 100
Basic Data ············································ 112
Export Performance of Targeted Industrial Products ··········· 112
Numbers of Farmers Training Centers and AgriculturalExtension Workers ······································ 123
Numbers of Extension Workers and Service Delivery Stations(Allocated or Established) ································ 123
Agricultural Production ·································· 125
Land Productivity of Major Crops·························· 125
Malaysia’s SME Support Programs ························· 166
Alliance between Leadership and Technocrat Teams in East Asia · 170
Thailand: Institutes Created as Part of IRP (as of Oct. 1999) ····· 184
A Comparison of Two Approaches ························· 201
Two Approaches to Export Promotion and Import Substitution ··· 206
Current PASDEP: Numerical Targets Related to Industry ······· 212
Current PASDEP: Major Achievements in Trade andIndustry by 2007/08 ····································· 213
Possible Ingredients of Trade and Industry Chapter ············ 218
Ingredients of an Industrial Master Plan ····················· 221
Relative Scope of Government versus Market ················ 230

Table 10-1
Table 10-2
Table 10-3
Table 10-4
Table 10-5
Table 10-6
Table 10-7

Definition of BMEIs ···································· 240
List of Master Plans and Other Planning Documents
Referred in This Chapter ································· 241
Production Capacity and Actual Production in 2009/10 (Unit: ton) 249
New Facilities Installed in the Last Five Years (Unit: ton) ······· 249
Steel Consumption Projection (Unit: ton) ···················· 250
Projection of Gross Production (Unit: ton) ··················· 250
Minimum Efficient Scale and Initial Investment
Cost for Major Processes ································· 254

List of Figures
PageFigure 1-1

GRIPS-JICA Industrial Policy Dialogue and Industrial
Support Projects ········································ 11
Figure 4-1
Standard Policy Making Procedure ························· 78
Figure 4-2
Technocrat Team Supporting Top Leader ···················· 80
Figure 4-3
South Korea 1960s-70s: Economic Planning Board ············ 81
Figure 4-4National Council or Committee ···························· 82
Figure 4-5
Singapore: National Productivity and Continuing Education Council 84
Figure 4-6
Malaysia: National SME Development Council ··············· 85
Figure 4-7
Korea: Presidential Committees···························· 87
Figure 4-8Japan: Organizational Structure of MITI ····················· 89
Figure 4-9Japan: MITI’s Policy Formulation (late 1950s-early 1970s) ······ 90
Figure 4-10 Thailand: Specialized Institute Approach(Under Thaksin Government 2001-2006) ···················· 95
Figure 4-11 Standard Ingredients of an Industrial Master Plan ·············· 97
Figure 4-12 Ethiopia: A Suggested National Council Approach ············ 104
Figure 5-1
Patterns of Systemic Transformation ······················· 118
Figure 5-2
Democratic Developmentalism of Ethiopia ·················· 128
Figure 5-3
Dynamic Transition of East Asian Authoritarian Developmentalism129
Figure 5-4
Linkages in Core ADLI ································· 132
Figure 5-5
Resource Transfers between Agriculture and Industry ········· 135
Figure 6-1
Possible Enhancement of Industrial Policy Structure ·········· 149
Figure 6-2
Material Flows of the Vietnamese Iron and Steel Industry, 2005 · 160

Figure 7-1
Figure 7-2
Figure 7-3
Figure 7-4
Figure 7-5
Figure 7-6
Figure 9-1
Figure 9-2
Figure 10-1
Figure 10-2
Figure 10-3
Figure 10-4
Figure 10-5
Figure 10-6
Figure 10-7
Figure 10-8
Figure 10-9

Japan: The Structure of the Ministry of International
Trade and Industry ····································· 174
Japan: MITI’s Deliberation Council and Policy Formulation(late 1950s–early 1970s) ································ 175
South Korea: Development Vision and Government-BusinessPartnership (1960s–70s) ································· 176
Malaysia: Mechanisms for Industrial Policy Coordination (1991– ) 180
Thailand: Formulation and Implementation of IRP (after 1997) ·· 183
Thailand: Coordination and Decision-making for ESD········· 189
Master Plan Structure: A Comparison ······················ 231
Thai Automotive Master Plan: 5 Strategies and 12 Action Plans 233
Study Flow ··········································· 246
Material Flow of Steel Industry in Ethiopia·················· 248
Iron and Steel Manufacturing Process ······················ 249
Estimation of Basic Metal Production (Unit: ton) ············· 251
Proposed Scenario for Achieving Domestic Production andImport Substitution····································· 253
Basic Metal Products: Technological Development Scenario ···· 253
World Direct Reduced Iron Production ····················· 255
Direct Reduced Iron versus Blast Furnace··················· 255
Required Technological Capability and Acquired Technology ofBMEIs for the Power Sector: A Possible Scenario ············ 259