www.ti.com

Technical Article

How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks commonmode filter size

Timothy Hegarty

Other Parts Discussed in Post: TPSF12C3-Q1, TPSF12C1-Q1
Automotive on-board chargers and server power supplies are highly constrained system environments wherepower density is a primary metric. It’s important to reduce the volume of the electromagnetic interference (EMI)filter components so that the solution can fit into demanding form factors.
Common-mode (CM) filters for these and other high-density applications often limit the total Y-capacitance –related to touch-current safety requirements – and thus require large-sized CM chokes to achieve a target cornerfrequency or filter attenuation characteristic. The result is a compromised passive filter design with bulky, heavy
and expensive CM chokes that dominate the overall filter size.
With advances in passive components lagging behind high-speed power semiconductor devices as well as
circuit topologies, the volume of the passive filter is one of the limiting factors for increasing power density.
Practical filter implementations can occupy as much as 30% of the total volume of a power solution, as shown in
Figure 1.

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated1

www.ti.com

Figure 1. A conventional single-phase passive EMI filter in a 3.3-kW totem-pole power factor correctionreference design
Reduce system size, weight and cost

Learn more about our power-supply filter ICs.

Active EMI filter (AEF) circuits enable more compact filter solutions for next-generation power-management
systems. Space-constrained applications can use active power-supply filter integrated circuits (ICs) to reduce
the size of magnetic components and the overall filter. Additional benefits of an AEF include lower component
power losses for better thermal management and higher reliability, reduced coupling between components withina confined space, easier mechanical and packaging design, and lower costs.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 are schematics of single-phase and three-phase filter circuits, respectively, where an
active solution replaces a traditional passive design. The single-phase TPSF12C1, TPSF12C1-Q1 and threephase TPSF12C3, TPSF12C3-Q1 AEF ICs, positioned between the CM chokes, provide a lower-impedanceshunt path for CM currents. As illustrated, the active solution has CM chokes LCM1 and LCM2 with much lower
inductance relative to the same components in the passive filter.

2How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

www.ti.com

Figure 2. Single-phase passive EMI filter (top) and corresponding AEF circuit with lower CM choke
inductances (bottom)

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated3www.ti.com

Figure 3. Three-phase passive EMI filter (top) and corresponding AEF circuit with lower CM choke
inductances (bottom)
AEFs
With Y-rated sense and injection capacitors connected to the AC lines, the circuits aim to reduce the total filter
volume yet maintain low values of the line-frequency leakage current to chassis ground. This is possible by using
an active circuit that shapes the frequency response of the injection capacitor – effectively increasing its value
for high frequencies. In turn, the amplified injection capacitance over the frequency range of interest for EMI
mitigation will lower CM choke inductances relative to the values of a passive filter with comparable attenuation.
The circuit advantages using an AEF are:
••
•
•
•
•

A simpler filter structure with a wide operating frequency range and high stability margins (calculated using
the common-mode AEF quickstart calculator tool).
A reduced CM choke size with lower volume, weight and cost. This also enables much lower copper losses
and better high-frequency attenuation performance from reduced choke self-parasitics.
No additional magnetic components – the AEF circuit only uses Y-rated sense and injection capacitors, withno impact to peak touch current during a fault condition.
Enhanced safety using a low-voltage AEF IC referenced to chassis ground.
A stand-alone IC implementation that offers flexibility in terms of placement near the filter components.
Immunity to line voltage surges to help meet International Electrotechnical Commission 61000-4-5.

The X-capacitor(s) placed between the two CM chokes in Figure 4 and Figure 5 provide a low-impedance path
between the power lines from a CM standpoint, typically up to low-megahertz frequencies. This allows current
injection onto one power line, usually neutral, using only one injection capacitor. If the three-phase filter is athree-wire system without a neutral, the SENSE4 pin of the TPSF12C3-Q1 ties to ground and the injection
capacitor couples through a starpoint connection of the X-capacitors.

4How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

www.ti.com

Practical AEF implementation
Figure 4 shows a practical AEF implementation suitable for the converter in Figure 1. Using the TPSF12C1-Q1
single-phase AEF IC achieves CM noise attenuation.

Figure 4. Single-phase filter evaluation board with the AEF rated at 10 A
Figure 5 shows EMI results with the AEF disabled and enabled.

Figure 5. EN 55032 Class B EMI results with the AEF disabled and enabled
As evident in Figure 5, an AEF provides up to 30 dB of CM noise attenuation in the low-frequency range(100 kHz to 3 MHz), which enables a filter using two 2-mH nanocrystalline chokes to achieve CM attenuation
performance equivalent to a passive filter design with two 12-mH chokes. To make a fair comparison, thesechokes come from the same component family (made by Würth Elektronik) with a similar core material. Table
1 captures the applicable CM-choke parameters for the passive and active designs, and Figure 6 highlights thevolume, footprint, weight and cost savings.

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated

5

www.ti.com
Filter design

CM choke part Qty
number

LCM1, LCM2RDCR (mΩ)

(mH)

Size
(L × W × H, mm)

Total mass(g)

Total power loss(W) at 10 A, 25°C

Passive7448051012

21215

23 × 34 × 33

726.0

Active7448031002

22617 × 23 × 25

202.4

Figure 6. Footprint, volume, weight and cost reductions enabled by an AEF (a);choke size comparison (b)The AEF in this example achieves a 60% total copper loss reduction at 10 A (neglecting the winding resistanceincrease from the temperature rise), which implies lower component operating temperatures and improved
reliability.
Conclusion
It’s challenging to achieve a compact and efficient design for the EMI filter stage in high-density switchingregulators, particularly for automotive and industrial applications where solution size and cost are such priorities.
Practical results from an active filter solution to suppress the measured CM noise signature indicate a significant
volumetric reduction of the CM choke components when benchmarked against an equivalent passive-only filter
design.
Additional resources:• Watch a video on active EMI filtering: Single- and three-phase active EMI filter ICs mitigate common-mode
EMI, save space and reduce cost.
• Review these white papers:– “How active EMI power-supply filter ICs mitigate common-mode emissions and increase power density insingle- and three-phase power systems.”– “An overview of conducted EMI specifications for power supplies.”• For more details about the example in Figure 1, showing a conventional filter design, see the High efficiency
GaN CCM totem pole bridgeless Power Factor Correction (PFC) reference design.

6How a stand-alone active EMI filter IC shrinks common-mode filter size
Copyright © 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated

SNVAA72 – APRIL 2023
Submit Document Feedback

IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
TI PROVIDES TECHNICAL AND RELIABILITY DATA (INCLUDING DATA SHEETS), DESIGN RESOURCES (INCLUDING REFERENCEDESIGNS), APPLICATION OR OTHER DESIGN ADVICE, WEB TOOLS, SAFETY INFORMATION, AND OTHER RESOURCES “AS IS”
AND WITH ALL FAULTS, AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS AND IMPLIED, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANYIMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NON-INFRINGEMENT OF THIRDPARTY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
These resources are intended for skilled developers designing with TI products. You are solely responsible for (1) selecting the appropriate
TI products for your application, (2) designing, validating and testing your application, and (3) ensuring your application meets applicablestandards, and any other safety, security, regulatory or other requirements.
These resources are subject to change without notice. TI grants you permission to use these resources only for development of an
application that uses the TI products described in the resource. Other reproduction and display of these resources is prohibited. No license
is granted to any other TI intellectual property right or to any third party intellectual property right. TI disclaims responsibility for, and you
will fully indemnify TI and its representatives against, any claims, damages, costs, losses, and liabilities arising out of your use of theseresources.
TI’s products are provided subject to TI’s Terms of Sale or other applicable terms available either on ti.com or provided in conjunction withsuch TI products. TI’s provision of these resources does not expand or otherwise alter TI’s applicable warranties or warranty disclaimers for
TI products.
TI objects to and rejects any additional or different terms you may have proposed. IMPORTANT NOTICE
Mailing Address: Texas Instruments, Post Office Box 655303, Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright © 2023, Texas Instruments Incorporated