[TRANSLATION]【Cover】【Filing Document】

Extraordinary Report【Filed With】

Director-General of the Kanto Local Finance Bureau【Filing Date】

June 26, 2012

【Corporate Name】

Central Japan Railway Company【Name and Title of Representative】 Yoshiomi Yamada
President and Representative Director【Location of Head Office】

1-4, Meieki 1-chome, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, Aichi
Prefecture【Telephone Number】+81-52-564-2620【Name of Contact Person】

Ataru KimuraManager of the Stock Section, Administration
Department【Place to Contact】

1-4, Meieki 1-chome, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, Aichi
Prefecture【Telephone Number】+81-52-564-2620【Name of Contact Person】

Ataru KimuraManager of the Stock Section, Administration
Department【Place(s) at Which Copies of thisExtraordinary Report are
Available for Public Inspection】

Conventional Lines Operations Division, Central
Japan Railway Company (Note)(3-4, Meieki 1-chome, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya)Shizuoka Branch Office, Conventional Lines
Operations Division, Central Japan Railway
Company(4, Kurogane-cho, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka)
Shinkansen Operations Division, Central Japan
Railway Company(9-1, Marunouchi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo)

Kansai Branch Office, Shinkansen Operations
Division, Central Japan Railway Company(5-15, Nishinakajima 5-chome, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka)
Nagoya Stock Exchange, Inc.
(8-20, Sakae 3-chome, Naka-ku, Nagoya)Tokyo Stock Exchange Group, Inc.
(2-1, Nihonbashi Kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo)
Osaka Securities Exchange Co., Ltd.
(8-16, Kitahama 1-chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka)(Note) The Conventional Lines Operations Division
is not a place for public inspection specified by law;however, it is provided as a place for public
inspection for the convenience of investors.

1.

【Reason for Filing】

The following matters were resolved at the 25th ordinary general meeting ofshareholders of Central Japan Railway Company (the “Company”), held on June 22,
2012. The Company accordingly files this extraordinary report under Article 24-5,
Paragraph (4) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, and under Article 19,
Paragraph (2), Item (ix-ii) of the Cabinet Office Ordinance Relating to Disclosure ofCorporate Affairs and Other Related Matters.
2.

【 Contents of this Report】(1) Date on which the 25th ordinary general meeting of shareholders was held:
June 22, 2012
(2) Contents of the resolved matters:
Proposal 1:

Appropriation of retained earnings

Matters concerning year-end dividends:
Five thousand (5,000) yen per common share of the Company
Proposal 2:
Partial amendment to the Articles of Incorporation(i) Required amendments were made that had become necessary due to theresolution of the meeting of the Board of Directors held on April 26, 2012
which adopted a share unit system that made the number of shares ofcommon stock constituting 1 unit 100 shares, as well as split the shares in
the proportion of 100 shares for 1 share.
(ii) The number of Directors was reduced in association with the changes to theofficer system for the purpose of more prompt decision-making and toenhance discussion at meetings of the Board of Directors and better
clarification of the division of the roles shared between Directors andCorporate Executive Officers who are in charge of the execution ofbusiness.
(iii) In order to retain talented personnel hereafter, provisions to the effect that
the Company may enter into a liability limitation agreement with Outside
Directors and Outside Corporate Auditors were newly established.
Proposal 3:
Election of fourteen (14) Directors
Yoshiyuki Kasai, Yoshiomi Yamada, Koei Tsuge, Tsutomu Morimura, ShinKaneko, Naotoshi Yoshikawa, Masaki Seki, Katsumi Miyazawa, YutakaOsada, Sumio Kudo, Kimiaki Tanaka, Fujio Cho, Kenji Koroyasu andTakashi Saeki were elected as Directors.
Proposal 4:
Revision of the amount of Director’s remuneration
The amount of Director’s remuneration was revised to 1.2 billion yen or lessper year (of which the amount of Outside Director’s remuneration per year
shall be 50 million yen or less per year).

(3) Number of votes, indicating approval, disapproval, and abstention regarding theresolved matters, requirements for the resolved matters to be adopted, and resultof voting:Approval Disapproval Abstention
Approval
Result ofProposal(number of (number of (number ofRate
Votingvotes)votes)votes)(%)
Proposal 1
1,651,496
3,644
2,271
98.61
Adopted
Proposal 2
1,622,914
32,211
2,279
96.90
Adopted
Proposal 3
Yoshiyuki Kasai
1,638,926
16,1982,271
97.86
AdoptedYoshiomi Yamada
1,638,428
16,6962,271
97.83
AdoptedKoei Tsuge
1,637,216
15,8394,340
97.76
AdoptedTsutomu Morimura
1,637,210
15,8454,340
97.76
AdoptedShin Kaneko
1,637,19515,860
4,340
97.76
AdoptedNaotoshi Yoshikawa
1,637,228
15,8274,340
97.76
AdoptedMasaki Seki
1,644,005
9,050
4,340
98.16
AdoptedKatsumi Miyazawa
1,637,195
15,8604,340
97.76
AdoptedYutaka Osada
1,644,001
9,054
4,340
98.16
AdoptedSumio Kudo
1,644,006
9,049
4,340
98.16
AdoptedKimiaki Tanaka
1,643,993
9,062
4,340
98.16
Adopted
Fujio Cho
1,596,817
56,2384,340
95.34
AdoptedKenji Koroyasu
1,643,887
11,2372,271
98.15
AdoptedTakashi Saeki
1,638,817
16,3072,271
97.85
Adopted
Proposal 4
1,648,099
7,028
2,271
98.41
Adopted(Note)
The requirements for each proposal to be resolved were as follows:1.
For proposal 1, a majority of votes indicating the approval of the shareholders
who attended the meeting was required.
2.
For proposal 2, 2/3 or more of votes indicating the approval of theshareholders who attended the meeting with the attendance of shareholders
representing 1/3 or more of all voting rights that can be exercised was required.
3.
For proposal 3, a majority of votes indicating the approval of the shareholders
who attended the meeting with the attendance of shareholders representing 1/3
or more of all voting rights that can be exercised was required.
4.
For proposal 4, a majority of votes indicating the approval of the shareholders
who attended the meeting was required.
(4) Reason for not adding some of the votes of shareholders who attended theordinary general meeting of shareholders to the f inal number of votes:
The votes of shareholders who attended this general meeting of shareholders
on the meeting date, but have not been confirmed as to whether they indicatedapproval, disapproval or abstention, were not added to the final count because
the requirements for the proposals to be resolved were already met by adding
the votes from the exercise of voting rights as of the day before this general
meeting of shareholders was held to the votes of shareholders who attended thisgeneral meeting of shareholders, which were confirmed as approvals ordisapprovals, and the proposals were duly adopted in accordance with theCompanies Act.
-End-