INFRASTRUCTURE AND
TRANSPORT MINISTERS

National Road
Safety Strategy
2021–30

National
Road Safety
Strategy© Commonwealth of Australia 2021
ISBN 978-1-922521-09-1
December 2021 / INFRASTRUCTURE 4358

Ownership of intellectual property rights in this publication
Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the
Commonwealth of Australia (referred to below as the Commonwealth).

Disclaimer
The material contained in this publication is made available on the understanding that the Commonwealth is notproviding professional advice, and that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use, and seek
independent advice if necessary.
The Commonwealth makes no representations or warranties as to the contents or accuracy of the information
contained in this publication. To the extent permitted by law, the Commonwealth disclaims liability to any personor organisation in respect of anything done, or omitted to be done, in reliance upon information contained inthis publication.

Creative Commons licenceWith the exception of (a) the Coat of Arms; and (b) the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development
and Communications photos and graphics, copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy,
communicate and adapt this publication provided that you attribute the work to the Commonwealth and abide by theother licence terms.
Further information on the licence terms is available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This publication should be attributed in the following way: © Commonwealth of Australia 2021

Use of the Coat of Arms
The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet sets the terms under which the Coat of Arms is used. Please refer tothe Commonwealth Coat of Arms - Information and Guidelines publication available at http://www.pmc.gov.au.

Contact us
This publication is available in PDF format. All other rights are reserved, including in relation to any Departmental logos
or trade marks which may exist. For enquiries regarding the licence and any use of this publication, please contact:
Director – Publishing and Communications
Communications Branch
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications
GPO Box 594
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia
Email: publishing@infrastructure.gov.au
Website: www.infrastructure.gov.au

Contents
Foreword 

1Strategy at a glance

2

Demonstrating Zero can be achieved

4

Top national safety performance indicators

5

Why do we need action? 

6

Movement and Place approach7

What can we achieve? 9Principles10Social model approach to road safety

12What will we do?13

Nine priorities towards Vision Zero 

15Enabling actions21

How we will do it

25

How we will work

26

Acronyms30

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

iii

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Foreword
Setting the direction for the next decade
Improving safety on our roads is critically important forAustralia. To achieve the change we need, we must lookat road safety over the next decade in a new way. As
Ministers, we refuse to accept that deaths and serious
injuries are an inevitable price of mobility. We haveagreed to reach towards Vision Zero by 2050.
Over the past 10 years under the National Road Safety
Strategy 2011–20, aligned with the United Nations
Decade of Action for Road Safety, governments together
have achieved many improvements in road infrastructure,
improved approaches to enforcement of speed limits
and other road rules, stronger graduated licensing
schemes for new drivers, vehicle safety improvements
such as Electronic Stability Control, and other areas. A
key achievement was establishing improved road safety
as one of the key objectives of co-funded investment,
through the new National Partnership Agreement on
Land Transport Infrastructure Projects. We now need toensure that we measure and track that improvement.
Against strong population growth, we have seen a
reduction in annual deaths of 22.5 per cent over the
decade to the end of 2020. The previous strategy set
targets to reduce the numbers of both deaths and serious
injuries by at least 30 per cent. Although there has beena downward trend, we have not met the fatality target.
The number of people hospitalised after road crashes
has increased.
Australian governments at all levels are working together
with our communities to change the road transportsystem to prevent deaths and serious injuries. The 2018
Inquiry into the National Road Safety Strategy 2011–20
found we had a good, evidence-based action plan,
but were failing to fully implement it. Building on theInquiry and lessons learnt from the past, we know thatstronger accountability is required, accompanied by clear
performance measures.
With this Strategy we formally recognise the need tobuild institutional capacity to manage for results and weare establishing stronger governance, transparency andaccountability by all levels of government, and adopting
a social model approach to deliver road safety actions,
mapping out a path to foster a road safety culture acrossAustralian society.

Over the next decade from 2021 to 2030, this Strategy
represents our commitment to deliver significant
reductions in road trauma, putting Australia on a path toachieve Vision Zero by 2050.
Our targets are to reduce the annual number of fatalities
by at least 50 per cent (an estimated reduction in the
fatality rate per capita of 55 per cent) by 2030 and to
reduce the annual number of serious injuries by at least
30 per cent (an estimated reduction in the serious injury
rate per capita of 38 per cent) by 2030.
This Strategy continues our commitment to the Safe
System approach and to strengthening all elementsof our road transport system through mprovements
under 3 key themes: Safe roads, Safe vehicles andSafe road use. Speed management is embedded withinall 3 themes.
The Strategy will be supported by a National Road
Safety Action Plan, prioritising those national actions
that will contribute most strongly to reducing deaths
and serious injuries, and setting in place comprehensive
performance management arrangements including
safety performance indicators that will show the extent
of transformation of the road transport system.
Work has commenced in the National Road Safety Data
Hub. It has delivered an initial set of outputs and will havethe capability to track performance against the safety
performance indicators as new national data becomes
available. It will also support the development of newpolicy measures as transport trends change due to future
disruptions and factors outside of our control.
We welcome the United Nations’ decision to declarea second Decade of Action on Road Safety. We see
great opportunities to prevent road trauma, improve
productivity and efficiency with our future focused
towards Vision Zero, positively influencing road safety
outcomes for Australia and other countries in our region.

Infrastructure and Transport Ministers

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

1Strategy at a glance
Targets by 2030

M
GE

Infrastructure
planning &investment

VehiclesafetyVulnerable
road users

ENABLING ACTIONS

E

D

T
N

T

N

E

MANA

SAFE
ROAD USE

E

D

SAFE
VEHICLES

SP

E

M

E

SP

E

MANAGE

Fatalities
reduced by

Serious injuries
reduced by

an approximate reduction
in rate per capita of 55%

an approximate reduction
in rate per capita of 38%

NT

SAFE
ROADS

E

PRIORITIES

ED

E

SP

THEMES

Movement and Place

MANA

M
GE

Regional
road safetyHeavyvehicle safety

Workplaceroad safety

Riskyroad use

Measure transformationof the system

Data and research

Cultural change

Road safety capacity
building

Supporting local
government

Connected andautomated vehicles

Reduction in the ageof fleet vehicles

Improve road safety
outcomes for Aboriginal andTorres Strait Islander people

National Road Safety Action Plan

Implementation by all governments

230%

Note: Serious injuries target is interim until mid-term review
to establish the potential for lifting it by 2030

Aboriginal andTorres Strait Islander
peopleRemote roadsafety50%

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Taking on lessons from the previous reviews
to ensure implementation• Clear governance arrangements• Evidence-based policy and programs• Transparency and accountability – regularreviews and reporting• Oversight by Australian Parliament Joint
Select Committee on Road Safety and Officeof Road Safety• Published dashboards showing rate of change• Performance framework – outcome indicatorsand safety performance indicators regularly
assessed and published• Investment tied to improved road safety
outcomes• Future focused research and development

Where we want to be• As a community we no longer accept a transport system that results in deaths and serious injuries
to road users• Over 10 years, we expect a significantly reduced burden on our economy and society from roadcrashes in terms of deaths; life-changing injuries; demands on the health sector; and trauma forfamilies, first responders and communities, including mental health impacts• We will have safe, sustainable transport options for all ages and abilities, including the mostvulnerable in our communities

Key changes by 2030
These are some of the key changes we expect to see over the next 10 years.
• The social model has been widely adopted toinfluence prioritisation of road safety in a wide
range of organisations• The rate of transformation to a safe roadtransport system has been accelerated,
supported by data and evidence• Nationally, a significant increase of total roadtransport infrastructure funding is directed totargeted road safety improvement• Strong partnerships are established andworking to reduce the over representation ofAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people inroad trauma• There has been significant growth in roadsafety management capacity leading tostronger decision-making in:– government agencies – infrastructure,transport, planning, health, justice• Road safety is a key objective of local
government road network management
practices and the majority of councils have
network safety plans• There is evidence of cultural change in thecommunity, with greater understandingof the Safe System approach and greater
acceptance of road safety solutions• At least 25 per cent of the light vehicle fleet
is 5-star Australasian New Car Assessment
Program (ANCAP) rated with a date stamp
6-years-old at maximum, and the average ageof the light vehicle fleet is under 9 years• Safe System investigations of fatal andserious injury crashes are routine for all fatal
crashes and at least 10 per cent of serious
injury crashes– ‘system designer’ organisations –consultancies, educational institutions,employers, transporters, community
organisations
National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

3

0
0

zero

Demonstrating

can be achieved

As part of thecommitment to the2050 Vision Zero target,
we will demonstrate
success by targetingzero deaths and serious
injuries by 2030

Zero deaths of children
7-years and under0
Zero deaths
in city CBD
areas

0

Zero deaths on all
national highways and on
high-speed roads covering
80% of travel across the
network

4

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Top national safety performanceindicators
Safety performance indicators provide an understanding of performance against
the National Road Safety Strategy 2021-30 (the Strategy), whether intervention
measures are effective, and whether it has set the right directions.

The primary measures of success are overall reductions in road trauma. However, these are lag indicators – we find out
after the fact if we were successful. Lead indicators are equally important, as they signal the priority of a measure andthe focus required, as well as the safety gap that needs to be overcome to achieve a positive outcome.
This list of top indicators will be the main focus of public monitoring to provide a simpler picture of progress in key areas.
Ongoing collaborative work will be needed to establish appropriate indicators, definitions and to explore data sourcesthat will allow measurement.

Lag indicators

Safe vehicles•

Number and rate per capita of road crash fatalities••

Number and rate per capita of road crash serious
injuries (measured against the national definition –admitted to hospital irrespective of length of stay)

Safe road use

Lead indicators
Safe roads•

Share of state and territory governments andlocal councils with a fit-for-purpose road safety
risk assessment as an investment plan for its
infrastructure•

Share of travel on all national highways and on thehigh speed network (≥ 80 km/h) covering 80% of
travel recognised as 3-stars (or equivalent risk rating)or better•

Share of road length on designated motorcycle routes
with motorcycle friendly crash barriers•

Share of high pedestrian CBD/town centre areas
under Movement and Place or equivalent approacheswith posted speed limits ≤ 40 km/h•

Share of roads in urban areas with a posted speed
limit ≥ 50 km/h with separated cycle ways, and in
urban areas outside of ABS remoteness category‘major cities’•

Share of signalised intersections with a speed limit< 70 km/h

Share of light vehicle fleet that has an ANCAP 5-starrating within a 6-year date stamp•

Share of drivers and riders tested who are not over
the applicable blood alcohol concentration limit orunder the influence of drugs•

Share of vehicles at or below speed limit•

Share of drivers and riders observed/photographed
not using a mobile phone or device•

Share of motor vehicle occupants wearing seatbelts

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

5Why do we need action?
1,200
people die on
Australia’s roads
every year

40,000hospitalised in 2018

Increase of 3.3% per annum
from 2013
25% hospitalised had highthreat to life injuries

9% OVER
2011–20TARGET

OVER

3,000

people are recorded on theAustralian Trauma Registry every
year with very severe injuries

1,426 DEATHS
Average annual
baseline from 2008–10
1,106 DEATHS
Actual reported
for 2020

34.8%< 998 DEATHS
Strategy target notreached by 2020

Reduction in rates
of death

AS A PROPORTION PER POPULATION,
WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS

6.6 (2008–10 baseline) to 4.3 (2020)
deaths per 100,000 population
15.1% population increaseover the decade

MAJOR CITYREGIONAL

REMOTE

2.2 road deaths per 100,000 (2019)142.8 serious injuries
per 100,000 (2018)10.0 road deaths per 100,000 (2019)171.1 serious injuries
per 100,000 (2018)25.1 road deaths per 100,000 (2019)244.0 serious injuries
per 100,000 (2018)$30 BILLION
ANNUAL COST TO THE
NATIONAL ECONOMY
6

AlmostSERIOUSINJURIES ARE
INCREASING

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

OVER THE LAST DECADE
12,061 people were killed
Approximately 375,000 people
were seriously injured
The overall cost of road crashes
to the Australian economy isestimated at $300 billion

Movement and Place approach
Driving and road use is a significant
part of the Australian way of lifeand business. Australia is a large
country and many of us rely on
private road transport to get towork or play, and on trucks todeliver our produce and consumer
goods. Equally, streets are also hubsof social exchange and activities, be
it of local or city-wide significance.
By recognising and supporting therole of streets as destinations, we
can both reduce the need to traveland design safer roads.

Car-oriented street

TOTAL CAPACITY:
12,300 PEOPLE PER HOUR

While much was achieved under the previous strategy,
we are still seeing increases in serious injuries,
significant costs to the economy from road crashes,and significant impacts on all road users, including
disadvantaged groups.
The way we design our roads and streets determines
people’s quality of life, interactions and experiences. To
enable reaching our goal of zero deaths and serious
injuries, a shift is needed to move from a traditional roadclassification system to focus on people, recognising thedesign of streets should work to maximise safe accessfor people.
This approach to planning known as Movement andPlace is an understanding that roads and streets serve
dual functions as essential corridors for moving people
and goods from A to B and important public spaces
where life unfolds. Taking a Movement and Placeapproach supports the delivery of the Safe System.
The Movement and Place approach informs road design
and takes speed management into consideration toensure reductions in road trauma in urban, regional andremote communities. Implementing the best features of‘self-explaining’ roads is also important when considering
treatment options in urban areas.

Multimodal street

TOTAL CAPACITY:
30,100 PEOPLE PER HOUR

MODAL SHIFT
Adapted from NACTO Global Street Design Guide
National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

7

Understanding the relative people-moving capacity ofvarious modes, together with their spatial needs, is key increating a safe street. Multimodal streets support many
modes and provide efficiencies by both moving andholding more people more safely.
In urban areas, the road and street environment is
becoming increasingly complex. The safety context
includes the ever growing diversity of mode types, withincompatible masses and speeds. Therefore, the Place
aspect has a strong influence in enabling safety. It is notjust the people travelling through who are affected bytraffic – residents, shopkeepers and people going about
their days in a Place also stand to benefit from calmer
street environments. Safety applies regardless of roadand street type and must be considered in terms of likely
conflicts, especially for vulnerable road users. The Safe
System approach requires us to expand the understandingof Movement and Place to fully recognise walking as amode of transport. This means greater emphasis is needed
for the safety of all types of pedestrian activity acrossthe spectrum, be that walking to work or school, or otherpedestrian activity not fully captured under Place.

PEOPLE PRECINCTS
High place value
providing amenity andvalue to communities
with low vehicle
movement

High Place

Significant Place with Some Movement
LOCAL STREETS
Suburban neighbourhoods
that facilitate local
community access

URBAN STREETS

Some Movement with Some PlaceHigh movement zones
balanced with thedemand of place in thesurrounding footprint

Significant Movement with Some Place
MOVEMENT CORRIDORS
Safe, reliable and efficient
movement of people andgoods between regions
and strategic centres

MOTORWAYS

High Movement

Significant arterials
that move people andgoods rapidly over long
distance

Sources: Austroads, Research Report AP-R611-20 Integrating Safe System with Movement and Place for Vulnerable Road Users(2020), Austroads, Research Report AP-R560-18 Towards Safe System Infrastructure: A Compendium of Current Knowledge (2018).

8

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

What can we achieve?
This Strategy aims to preventand reduce deaths and serious
injuries from road crashes overthe next 10 years, and support
our long-term vision of zeroby 2050.

Achieving these targets, particularly for serious
injuries, will be difficult. Driving down serious
injuries from road crashes will take time and ourefforts and assessment of progress will be better
informed by a new national data series.

A person is considered to be seriously injured in a roadcrash if they are admitted to hospital, irrespective of thelength of stay.

In declaring a second United Nations Decade of Action
for Road Safety for 2021–30, the United Nations has
reaffirmed commitment to halving deaths and serious
injuries by 2030.

Our ultimate goal is to reduce deaths and serious
injuries to zero by 2050.

The target of at least a 30 per cent reduction in serious
injuries by 2030 is considered an interim target that will
be carefully assessed as part of the mid-term review of
the Strategy. Based on the evidence currently available
and recent trends, a 30 per cent reduction is alreadyambitious, but there is a will to capitalise on progress andrevisit the target in 2025 if we are successful in shifting
the trend.

Targets
by 2030
BASELINE(annual average
2018–20)

This Strategy has adopted per capita rates to accompany
the headline targets because they are a better option toshow progress in the intervening decades, allowing for
disruptions and variations in population growth between
jurisdictions, regions, age groups and road user groups.
Per capita rates also allow us to compare our progresswith leading international jurisdictions, and also highlightwhich groups are disproportionately affected by roadtrauma and where things are going well.

Fatalities
reduced by

Serious injuries
reduced by

an approximate reduction inrate per capita of 55%

an approximate reduction inrate per capita of 38%

50%

30%

ANNUALNUMBERRATE PERCAPITA

1,142

4.5

40,472* 159.6

2.0

29,000to fewer
than

571

to lessthan

ANNUALNUMBERto fewer
than

RATE PERCAPITAto lessthan

99.6*National Road Safety Strategy baseline is 40,472 serious injuries. This is a 3-year average of hospital cases for 2017–18 and 2018–19, and estimates for 2019–20.

Long-term goal: zero fatalities by 2050 and zero serious injuries by 2050
9

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

9Principles
These important principles guide this Strategy.

A long-term vision• To achieve zero deaths and serious injuries by 2050 – a safe road-transport system inwhich a mistake does not cost a person’s life or health

Safe System approach• To be in step with the United Nations approach to global road safety through its
Sustainable Development Goals and the second Decade of Action on Road Safety

Managing for results• To overcome implementation failure of the past decade and take on the lessons highlighted
by the 2018 Inquiry into the National Road Safety Strategy 2011-20 and the subsequent
Review of National Road Safety Governance Arrangements, governments will ensure
results through strengthened institutional management

Ten-year targets• To reduce the number of deaths from road crashes by at least 50 per cent by 2030 to fewer
than 571• To reduce the number of serious injuries from road crashes by at least 30 per cent by 2030
to fewer than 29,000

10National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Evidence-based approach• To select national priority actions on the basis of evidence and effectiveness, enabled by anational data hub

Clear governance arrangements• To be clear on who is responsible for actions

Transparency• To regularly publish progress on implementation, targets and safety performanceindicators, enabled by a national data hub

Strong accountability mechanisms• To provide oversight through the Office of Road Safety, establishment of a National Road
Safety Data Hub (Data Hub) and support for a Joint Standing Committee on Road Safety
to monitor progress under the Strategy and Action PlanBroad and shared responsibility• To continually reach out beyond the transport sector to find new partners to achievechangeNational Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

11Social model approach
to road safety

MANAGEM

SOCIAL MODEL

D

N

E

T

SAFE
ROAD USE

E

SP
T

N

E

D

SAFE
VEHICLES

E

E

M

SP

THEMESMANAGE

NT

SAFE
ROADS

E

• MOVEMENT AND PLACEINTEGRATING SPEED MANAGEMENTSP• STRENGTHENING INSTITUTIONALMANAGEMENT FUNCTIONSED

E• PREVENTING FATAL AND SERIOUS
INJURIESE

RESULTS FOCUS

MANAGEM

PRIORITIES
VehiclesafetySYSTEM/PUBLIC
POLICY APPROACH

Infrastructure
planning & investment

Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people

COMMUNITY
APPROACH

ORGANISATIONALAPPROACH

Vulnerable
road users

Workplaceroad safety

INTERPERSONALFUNCTIONS

Regional
road safety

Remote roadsafetyINDIVIDUAL
FUNCTIONS

Riskyroad useHeavy
vehicle safety

System/public policy approach: gearing policy settings, laws, regulation and investment through all levels ofgovernment to prevent road death and injury
Community approach: addressing issues from a grass-roots level to facilitate a positive road safety culture
Organisational approach: developing policies and systems to ensure safe road travel and travel-free meeting options
Interpersonal functions: delivering/driving a road safety focus and prevention of injury through effective andinfluential leadership
Individual functions: working with individuals to find approaches that resonate with individuals taking responsibility
for their own road safety
USING THE SOCIAL MODEL TO MAKE THE DIFFERENCE

12

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

What will we do?
As highlighted in the 2004 World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention, it is critical to build institutional capacity
to manage for results. Under this Strategy, governments have adopted a road safety management system,emphasising the necessary institutional management functions for optimal implementation and transformation of
the system.
Improving road safety requires a whole-of-system view, with an understanding of how different elements interact.
Each of the 3 main themes for this Strategy has a role to play in addressing each of the priorities, and often they areconnected in multiple ways. Key actions are listed against each of the priorities. However, in many cases actions willaddress issues under multiple priority areas.

Following the 2018 Inquiry into the effectivenessof the National Road Safety Strategy 2011–2020,
Australian governments have responded to the key
findings, adopting:•a long-term goal of zero deaths and serious injuries
from road crashes by 2050•

a focused set of key priorities for action•a series of safety performance indicators focused on
how harm can be eliminated from the system•better targeted road safety investment backed up by
better data and analysis•

better whole-of-government coordination acrossportfolios.

Across Australia different solutions are needed to support
improved safety outcomes in our road systems, whichvary widely.

To help position Australia to reach Vision Zeroby 2050 we need cultural change. To meet thischallenge, all tiers of government will work
together to deliver effective policy and programs.

Different solutions are needed
Australia has long adopted the Safe System approach
to road safety, and this Strategy continues following thisinternationally recognised approach. In this Strategy the
focus is on 3 main themes – Safe roads, Safe vehicles andSafe road use.

Speed management is critical
Supported by the Movement and Place approach, speed
management is important – it will underpin all of thethemes and be part of addressing the priority areas forthis Strategy.
Speed management is a critical factor in managing thephysical forces to which human bodies are subjected inany crash. The risk of death or injury increases markedly
and at different speeds depending on the type ofcollision. Recent research shows the relationship between
risk of injuries, fatalities and speed. Graphs 1 and 2 show
the risk of fatalities for pedestrians, and the risk of serious
injury while travelling in a vehicle. It is vitally importantthat we increase acceptance of the need to reduce speed
limits to improve road safety outcomes for all Australians.

This Strategy is based on the Safe Systemapproach, which requires a holistic view andconsiders how all elements of the road transportsystem work together to prevent death andserious injury.
The previous strategy presented 4 cornerstone
areas (also referred to as pillars). While the Safe
System approach emphasises interconnections
between the different parts of the system andinterventions, there has still been a tendency
to sometimes treat problems in separate ‘silos’.
This Strategy aims to integrate the Safe System
cornerstones and show the Safe System
holistically, with the system providing layers
of protection.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

13

RISK OF PEDESTRIAN FATALITY

Graph 1 – Pedestrian fatality risk by impact speed

1.00

Study estimates

0.75

Overall estimate
0.50

0.25
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0

10

20

30

40
50
60
70
IMPACT SPEED (KM/H)

80

90

100

Multiple research projects have demonstrated that the risk of fatality for pedestrians involvedin a vehicle crash increases with higher speeds.
Data analysis by Hussain et al (Graph 1) indicates that the risk of fatality is expected to reach
5 per cent in the event of a vehicle crash where the speed at impact is 30 km/h, and increases
significantly as the speed at impact increases, growing to 13 per cent at 40 km/h and 29 percent at 50 km/h. Other projects found this risk reaches 50 per cent at 59 km/h, 75 per cent at
69 km/h and 90 per cent at 80 km/h.
Source: Hussain et al., The relationship between impact speed and the probability of pedestrian fatality
during a vehicle–pedestrian crash: A systematic review and meta analysis (2019).

Graph 2 – Comparison of impact speed risk curves
100%

RISK OF SERIOUS INJURY

90%
80%

Head on
Side
Rear
Front

70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0

20

40

60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
IMPACT SPEED (KM/H)

Impact speed has a significant correlation to the risk of serious injury across different crashtypes, with head-on impacts carrying more risk at lower speeds. Graph 2 illustrates how
different crash types carry more risk of serious injury even at lower speeds.
The risk of serious injury reaches one per cent at 28 km/h for head-on impacts, 51 km/h forside impacts, 64 km/h for front impacts, and 67 km/h for rear impacts in light vehicle crashes,
showing the importance of prioritising the prevention of head-on crashes. At higher speeds,
the different crash types maintain these profiles, with head-on impacts rising to an increased
likelihood of serious injury of 50 per cent at 76 km/h, where side impacts carry the samerisk of serious injury at 90 km/h, rear impacts at 108 km/h, and front impacts that occur at
148 km/h.
Source: Doecke S.D et al., Impact speed and the risk of serious injury in vehicle crashes (2020).

14

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Nine priorities towards Vision Zero
Roads, roadsides, travel speeds and vehicles should be designed to avoid crashes or reduce their impact so they do
not result in death or serious injuries, but much of the system is not built this way. Solutions are continually being
developed and refined to improve our legacy road network and to build new roads that are safe. Given the size of thetask, we must prioritise changes that will achieve the greatest reductions in trauma.
Nine priority areas were identified through a process that included analysis of the available data on road crash deaths
and serious injuries, and taking into account expert views on how best to respond to the greatest road safety challenges
over the next decade. The priorities were refined after discussion with a wide range of stakeholders. While some key
actions addressing each of the priority areas are summarised here, under the Safe System approach many actions will
work across multiple priority areas. A National Road Safety Action Plan will provide more detail on the national priority
actions set out for the first 5 years of the Strategy and each jurisdiction will also deliver actions against these priorities.

Infrastructure planning and investment
Governments will focus on designing a Safe System that is future focused.
Even relatively low speeds can kill or seriously injure unless the vehicle, road, and roadsideenvironment are designed to take account of the physical vulnerability of all road users. In urban areas
there are many serious injuries to vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users that can be prevented.
The Movement and Place approach informs infrastructure planning to manage the risk of conflict.

Action summary•

Deliver measurable improvements in safety through infrastructure funding at all government levels and support local
governments to embed and deliver road safety into their business as usual•

Deliver systematic safety improvements on a road corridor basis against baseline assessment network safety plans,
which scope safety gaps across the network•

Manage speeds where there are conflicts between vehicles and road users and where infrastructure and roadsidehazards are likely, to avoid crashes resulting in death or serious injury

Regional road safety
Governments at all levels will plan and implement network-wide safety improvements.
The Remoteness Areas used by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) divide Australia into 5 categories
of remoteness on the basis of a measure of relative access to services. Around 55 per cent of road crashdeaths are in regional areas (ABS Inner and Outer Regional Areas) – with the majority of people killed onthese roads from regional areas.
The majority of these deaths result from lane departure crashes – run-off-road and head-on crashes.

Action summary•

Develop network safety plans, to prioritise road safety treatments that will have the most impact•

Implement staged Safe System treatments for roads with higher traffic volumes, including median and roadside
flexible safety barriers•

Implement staged risk-reduction treatments for roads with moderate to high traffic volumes, including audio-tactile
line markings (rumble strips), median treatments, targeted stretches of barrier treatment, shoulder widening andsealing, intersection treatments, and protection on curves and from roadside hazards•

Reduce speed limits for some roads, particularly undivided roads and where infrastructure improvements may notreach the whole network within the life of the Strategy•

Develop a Regulation Impact Statement on reducing the open road default speed limit

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

15

Remote road safety
Better transport options and assistance.
Based on the rate of deaths per 100,000 people, the risk to an individual of being killed on aroad in a remote area (ABS Remote and Very Remote Australia) is 11 times the risk of living ina major city. Of the 1,136 people killed in 2018, 116 were in remote areas of Australia. There isa greater proportion of unsealed roads and other lower quality roads with lower traffic volumes
and relatively high speed limits in remote areas.

Action summary•

Implement Safe System treatments on roads with higher volumes of traffic andcomprehensive risk reduction on roads with moderate volumes, in line with network
safety plans and priorities•

Develop a Regulation Impact Statement on reducing the default speed limit for unsealed
roads across both remote and regional areas•

Explore options to address the sustainability of community transport for remotecommunities•

Improve access to driver licensing programs and other transport assistance

Vehicle safety
Pursue technological improvements and uptake of safer vehicles.
By accepting responsibility for road safety, vehicle manufacturers have vastly increasedroad safety outcomes for vehicle occupants, building crash protection into their vehicles.
Vehicle technology developments and safety systems are now increasingly focused on crash
avoidance, such as lane keeping support, adaptive cruise control and blind spot detection.
Recently introduced Australian Design Rules (ADRs), including pole side impact protection,
motorcycle anti-lock braking systems and heavy vehicle electronic stability control, arecollectively estimated to save almost 850 lives over the next 15 years. New vehicle safetysystems will continue to reduce serious injuries to vehicle occupants and prevent fatal andserious injuries to vulnerable road users in urban areas.
Over the longer term, connected and automated vehicles and cooperative intelligent
transport systems have the potential to substantially improve road safety outcomes throughavoided deaths and injuries due to human error.

Action summary

16•

Prioritise and adopt proven technological improvements for all vehicle types throughnew ADRs as quickly as possible, e.g. systems assisting drivers to stay in their lane, andsystems that provide warnings when drivers are drowsy or distracted•

Support the quick adoption of vehicle safety regulation by investing in United Nations
new regulations working groups•

Conduct research into the effectiveness of new technologies to address the mostsignificant areas of road trauma and the most effective way to reduce the age of thevehicle fleet so an increasing proportion of road users have the advantage of modern
vehicle safety features•

Encourage and promote the voluntary uptake of vehicle safety technologies ahead of
regulation, including through ongoing support of ANCAP and through fleet purchasing
policies to ensure vehicles are the safest available•

Implement a national approach to the regulation of vehicles with automated driving
systems, to facilitate the safe deployment of these vehicles on Australian roads•

Prepare the road network for connected and automated vehicle developments, including
supporting infrastructure and technologies to enable advanced safety services

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Heavy vehicle safety
Support safe movement of freight and passengers and reduce harm to allroad users.
Around 18 per cent of all road crash deaths involve a heavy vehicle. Buses represent only avery small proportion of these deaths.
While heavy vehicles crash less often than other vehicles, these crashes are more likely toresult in a death or serious injury. Regardless of fault, the greater mass of these vehicles
contributes a considerable amount of kinetic energy to a crash, with the other vehicle orvulnerable road user in the collision often enduring the worst of the impact.

Action summary•

Regulate for and promote heavy vehicle safety technologies•

Strengthen national heavy vehicle operational regulation•

Provide community and novice driver education about sharing the roads safely withheavy vehicles•

Promote and reduce barriers to the uptake of safe new heavy vehicles•

Protect all road users from conflicts with construction vehicles through state/territory
government construction contract requirements such as requiring inclusion of safety
technologies•

Consider the scope for Safe System investigations of fatal and serious-injury heavy
vehicle crashes•

Support fatigue management through investment in heavy vehicle rest stops

Workplace road safety
Enable safety culture in organisations to take responsibility for vehicles androads as a workplace.
In 2018, there were 144 fatalities reported as a result of injuries sustained in the courseof work-related road transport activity. In total 44 of these (31 per cent) were the result ofvehicle collisions and a further 45 were related to vehicles in other ways, for example, fallingfrom vehicles or being injured while loading vehicles, meaning that a total of 89 fatalities (or62 per cent of all work fatalities) were related to vehicles.

Action summary•

Ensure organisations are aware of their work health and safety (WHS) responsibilities inrelation to vehicles and the road as a workplace, the right of workers to a safe workplace,and organisations have the information they need to support decision-making•

Establish an appropriate framework to support organisations to take responsibility forroad and the right of workers to a safe workplace, and for organisations to have theinformation they need to support decision-making•

Support implementation of Austroads’ Vehicles as a Workplace: Work Health & Safety
Guide

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

17Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
Address the over representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people in road trauma.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people bear a higher burden of road trauma –Australian Institute of Health and Welfare data shows Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people are nearly 3 times more likely to die in road crashes than other Australians.
There is a growing evidence base supporting community-led programs as the mostsuccessful approach for health improvement. Child seat restraint programs, alternative
community-based transport, targeted approaches and human-centred design have led to
improved road safety outcomes.

Action summary•

Establish partnerships with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities andorganisations in order to develop place-based and community-led strategies to addressroad safety. These partnerships will incorporate the strong partnership elements underPriority Reform One of the National Agreement on Closing the Gap•

Work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and organisations to meetshared goals through the Closing the Gap Priority Reforms

Vulnerable road users
Provide safe access for all road users.
Roads are shared by many types of road users. Pedestrians and riders of bikes, scooters andmotorcycles have minimal physical protection, making them more vulnerable in the event ofa crash. Some people are vulnerable road users while at work – such as road workers, traffic
controllers, and delivery riders and some are more vulnerable due to age or other factors –such as children, inexperienced drivers/riders and older road users. The probability of deathor serious injury for unprotected road users like pedestrians and riders in a crash increases
exponentially with increasing vehicle speed. There is an estimated 10 per cent probabilityof being killed if struck at 30 km/h, but this rises to over 90 per cent at 50 km/h, the default
speed limit in built-up areas. In urban areas, almost one-third of all road crash deaths arepedestrians. The system needs to be designed and retrofitted to minimise the chances of
unprotected road users coming into conflict with vehicles.

Action summary

18•

Implement Movement and Place approaches across the road network to support bestpractice speed management and tailored Safe System road treatments to provide saferoad environments for pedestrians and cyclists•

Promote sustainable and integrated transport alternatives to private vehicle use•

Develop a national guide for best practice and consistent speed limit setting to prevent
fatal and serious injuries to vulnerable road users including consideration of reviewing
the default speed in built-up areas•

Implement infrastructure treatments for the protection of all vulnerable road users•

Strengthen graduated licensing arrangements for novice motorcycle riders•

Promote consumer information about the benefits of protective clothing and helmets forvulnerable road users•

Adopt best practice coordinated enforcement and education on key behavioural issues
including minimum passing distance, speed limits and drug and alcohol laws

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Risky road use
Increase community understanding of risky road use and address througheducation and enforcement.
Risky road use includes actions that are explicitly illegal, including speeding, drink or
drug driving, illegal mobile phone use, not wearing a seatbelt or helmet, running a red
light, unlicensed driving, and ‘hoon’ driving. Other high-risk behaviours include driving
at inappropriate speeds for conditions, driving while fatigued, distracted or inattentive,
overcrowding vehicles and walking near or on roads after drinking alcohol or taking
illegal drugs.
At times these behaviours can be unintentional and unconscious actions that arenormalised, and can apply to us all – the average driver and the person with a good driving
record. The challenge is to shift the culture to re-evaluate what is felt to be acceptable.
Road use also needs to be seen in a broader context, as the way people live their lives
affects their use of the roads. Under the social model, this Strategy recognises that otherpreventative health work, for example focusing on mental and physical health, will also
impact road safety.
A focus on reducing high-risk behaviour is needed as part of a Safe System approach, as
are improvements to the road transport system to address largely compliant road users
making unintentional mistakes resulting in crashes.

Action summary•

Increase community understanding of what risky behaviours are, and how much they canincrease road trauma•

Apply best practice coordinated enforcement, education, new technology and roadtreatments•

Implement the National Driver Distraction Roadmap•

Work towards the notion of ‘self-explaining’ roads – intuitively leads road users into
compliance•

Develop a national framework for the introduction of lower tolerances for driving impaired•

Establish national guidelines to support the introduction of Intelligent Speed Assist into thevehicle fleet•

Develop and implement an education program for court officials within the justice system tobetter understand the harms that lead to road trauma

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

19

20

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Enabling actions
Several broad enabling actions will need to be delivered across the life of
the Strategy.

Measure transformation of thesystemThis Strategy adopts an enhanced governanceframework and performance management and reporting
system. A key element is the focus on safety performanceindicators, closely tied to a National Road Safety Action
Plan to indicate the extent to which we have transformed
the road transport system to be safer overall. This action
is vital to ensure we are implementing the measures thatwill make a difference and can adjust plans in responseto changes in priority and emerging issues based on
results and evidence.

Data and research
Better national data and monitoring of road safety
across the whole system will be key to the success of thisStrategy. Currently we have reasonably good national
data on crashes resulting in fatalities, but there aremany other areas where there is scope for better datacollection and coordination, evaluation of interventions
and wider sharing of best practice. There are known
gaps, such as in work-related driving, but improved dataand identification of new sources will also shed light onpreviously unknown system issues.
Under this Strategy there will be a focus on identifying
proactive data sources that can highlight risk in thesystem, to support a greater emphasis on proactive roadsafety risk reduction over the next decade and reduced
reliance on reactive sources of data, which are still
important. There are also other vehicle-related safetyissues such as low-speed runovers of children, andsuicide, that are separate to road trauma data collections,but it is intended over the life of the Strategy to develop
sufficient data sets to build a national picture to support
their prevention.
Regarding serious injury data, progress is being made tobring together a national picture of serious injuries fromroad crashes by late 2021. With a national dataset wewill be able to better target the types of interventions
needed to prevent the most serious injuries and measure
the effectiveness of those treatments. We will work withdata custodians across sectors to create a framework
to support a timely ongoing data series. Security andprivacy, along with the optimisation of releases andpermission flows, require a robust framework to ensure
all concerns are addressed and result in the regularrelease of national serious injury data.
Although this Strategy has been developed with thebenefit of individual states’ and territories’ knowledge
about serious injury crashes and trends, once we havea national picture, there will be a need to review andpotentially adjust the priorities and actions.
The Data Hub will function as the mechanism forcollecting and analysing road safety data at a national
level. Initiatives around the Data Hub aim to:•support decision-making using current and accurate
data•

enable data-driven discovery to allow the detectionof patterns in data that may be available throughdisconnected and multiple sources of data located on
disparate platforms•

enable tracking of relevant safety performanceindicators•

provide an opportunity to share open datasets andoperate as a source of national data for researchersand data specialists to extract insights while
striking a balance with relevant privacy and data
sharing legislation.

Research is vital to progress the development of new
approaches, and to pilot and trial real-world newconcepts, test the limits to innovation and develop bestpractice and exemplar models and guidelines. While
there are existing national bodies to support suchresearch, there are also opportunities to leverage off thestrengths of tertiary institutions and continue to build
and strengthen partnerships with industry and particularcohorts of the community. A National Road Safety Action
Plan will prioritise a targeted research program thatwill change with time as new issues emerge and theimplementation of new programs is adopted. Research
will also support best practice Safe System investigation
processes, with a view to increasing the level ofunderstanding of crash prevention treatments needed
across the system.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

21Cultural change
We have experienced successful cultural change in roadsafety in the past. Measures that at first seemed extreme,
over time became normalised. For most people, wearing
motorcycle helmets and seatbelts is now automatic,
though this was not always the case. Mainstream
attitudes to drinking and driving have changed markedly
over time, with changes in the law supported by strong
education and enforcement campaigns, in particular the
introduction of random breath testing.
There remain many opportunities to improveunderstanding and attitudes to road safety issues,
including the challenges of different vehicle types sharing
the roads safely, risky road use behaviours, changing
the paradigm for novice drivers’ first car purchase, andincreasing consumer-driven demand for reducing risk
across the road network as a system.
There are many community and industry organisations
and groups already contributing to a safety culture inAustralia, including through the National Road Safety
Partnership Program as well as local, community-led
responses to road safety issues. The social model
approach to road safety recognises the importance of
these contributions and seeks to expand upon current
efforts across a greater number of layers of influence
across society.

finding different levers for change, and expanding theunderstanding of the Safe System across the community.
While the largest changes will be achieved through the
adoption of public policy – often called systemic change– the aim is for road safety to also be at the core of every
club, business and organisation to influence individuals
and achieve cultural change. For example, a starting
point could be to work with a high-profile sporting clubto establish a strong road safety policy across all of its
operations and be a champion for cultural change.
Some of the first steps governments will take toenable the social model approach will be to broaden
engagement across portfolios to find opportunities towork together and to influence other strategies, such as
the National Injury Prevention Strategy 2021–2030.

For some of the priorities, enabling
action is needed first, particularly towork out how to address complex
problems and develop future actions.

Road safety capacity building

A key challenge for embedding a Safe System approachis speed management. Community attitude surveys
show a level of understanding of how speed relates
to risk on the roads and good general support for
speed enforcement. However, many also think speed
enforcement – particularly speed cameras is as muchabout revenue-raising as safety, and do not appreciate
how crash risks compound with even small increases in
speed. Continuing work to change the culture on speed is
an immediate priority, but also one that will take time toreach its full potential.

Although the Safe System approach has been the basisof the National Road Safety Strategy for well over a
decade, recent reviews have identified the critical needfor Safe System principles to be more strongly embedded
across a broader range of government agencies at alllevels and particularly across the planning and transport
sectors. This requires efforts to build capacity andcapability not just in government agencies but all systemdesigners and operators, including engineers, planners,
lawmakers, enforcement agencies, post-trauma crashcare workers and others.

Australia has large road networks, and any infrastructure
treatments proposed may not be able to be applied to all
roads within the life of this Strategy. Speed limit reviews
are a key element of the comprehensive network-widesafety planning approach over the decade, especially tosupport vulnerable road users.

Key elements of this work will include:

Through the social model we will work over the decadeand beyond to increase the range of organisations
and sectors where road safety becomes a key part of
the way they operate. There are so many parties who
can influence trauma outcomes, and the social model
approach means being open to constantly exploring and22

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30•

establish formal arrangements for knowledge sharing,
including consideration of performance indicators forknowledge transfer•

make best practice training widely available inorganisations and tertiary institutions and incorporate
Safe System education in training for engineers,planners and others•deliver fit-for-purpose training for decision makers
across all levels of government to understand how tomanage for results.

Supporting local government
A large part of the road network is under local
government control. There is a need to build and retain
road safety engineering capability, secure stronger
engagement between state and territory governments
and their local government cohorts, and work towards
embedding road safety as a key reporting requirement forthe sector. A review of each state/territory’s requirements
for local governments is required in order to establish
the clear link of responsibility for the design, safety andmaintenance of each local government controlled road
network.
An initial enabling action will be for each local council
to undertake a road safety risk assessment – such asa road network safety plan. The framework for thesereviews, provided by Austroads, is an accessible,
low-cost method, outlined in the Network Design forRoad Safety User Guide. This method does not require
specialised skills or training, and support is available from
Austroads and state and territory governments. Network
safety plans will give councils the information they needto prioritise infrastructure investment over the life of theStrategy – within their available resources to improveroad safety outcomes and manage network safety gaps
across their road assets.

Improve road safety outcomesfor Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people
Early work shows we need to have better insightfrom Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people tounderstand the complex interaction of social, cultural,
safety and justice issues more fully before we canproceed with solution-oriented initiatives to addressroad safety.
The Australian Government will lead work, in close
consultation across its portfolios and with state, territory
and local governments, to build an understandingof the authorising environments and the interactionof government policies aimed at closing the gap for
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

23

Reduction in age of the fleet

Connected and automated vehicles

Many Australians drive vehicles over 10 years old. Theseolder vehicles often lack newer safety features, are more
likely to be involved in fatal and serious injury crashes,and provide less protection for the occupants and others
involved. ANCAP reported in 2017 that vehicles built
before 2000 made up 20 per cent of the fleet but featured
in 33 per cent of fatal crashes.

During the decade to 2030, there will be further pilots ofconnected and automated vehicles. While almost all new
passenger vehicles will, by 2030, likely contain advanced
safety features such as Lane Keep Assist and adaptive
cruise control, mass-deployment of highly-automatedvehicles on public road networks is expected to comelater.1

Newer vehicles built between 2011 and 2016 made up
31 per cent of the fleet, yet were involved in only 13 percent of fatal crashes.

Australian governments are continuing to work together
to realise the safety and productivity benefits that
adoption and take-up of connected and automatedvehicle technologies can offer. This includes work toready Australia for the commercial deployment of
automated vehicles through developing technology andstandards, putting in place fit-for-purpose regulation,and monitoring the safety performance of these vehicles
as they are implemented. This includes gaining stronger
evidence to understand the risks associated with theiruse on Australian roads, as well as the potential benefits
the adoption of these technologies can deliver, such as
expected reductions in road crashes due to human error.

The Australian heavy vehicle fleet also includes manyolder vehicles. The benefits of safer vehicle design andsafety technologies for new vehicles are only realised tothe extent that these vehicles enter the fleet and replaceolder, less safe vehicles.
We did not see any reductions in the age of the vehicle
fleets under the previous strategy. This is an area where
research and development is needed to underpin policy
development to achieve an uptake and increase thesaturation of safety features available across the national
fleet. The aim is to cease any consumer-driven demand
to import any star rated vehicles that do not meet thevoluntary 5-star ANCAP standard.

1

24

Many states and territories have undertaken – andcontinue to undertake – trials of connected andautomated vehicles, to understand the potential benefits
and develop public acceptance. Work is also underway todevelop a national framework for the safe deploymentsof automated vehicles.

Austroads, Research Report AP-R623-20 Future Vehicles 2030 (2020).
National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

How we will do it
What is different about this Strategy?
Following on from the findings of the 2018 Inquiry into
the National Road Safety Strategy 2011-20 and the2019 Review of National Road Safety Governance
Arrangements, this Strategy adopts a strengthened
institutional management function to focus on anenhanced governance framework and performance
management and reporting system. This will ensure allparties to the Strategy are accountable for implementing
it, including through establishing clear rigorous safety
performance measures.
The key criticism of the previous strategy and actionplans was implementation failure. A key lesson learnedis that stronger accountability is required. For thisStrategy there will be clear oversight from the AustralianParliament and the Office of Road Safety, in addition
to each agency reporting against its own measuresof delivery.
Australia has long had a strong evidence-based
approach to road safety. Improved performancemonitoring will allow closer analysis of what is working
and for corrections to be made as soon as possible. In
particular, the progress of this Strategy will be closely
monitored through a priority set of safety performanceindicators. These provide an understanding of the extent
to which the work being undertaken is transforming
the system – not just roads but all elements of the Safe
System – showing whether intervention measuresare effective, and whether the Strategy has set theright directions.
During the life of the Strategy the Data Hub will guide
evidence-based national policy and decision-making,focusing on the implementation of Safe Systemtreatments to progress to a safer network, where theroads are more forgiving of human error. It will also
support developing a better understanding of futurescenarios, especially in relation to changing trends intransport based on possible disruptions.

This Strategy remains firmly based on the international
best practice Safe System approach.
With this Strategy, we are adopting the social model
approach to road safety, reaching beyond the traditionaltransport sector to achieve cultural change. This will
require ongoing engagement across diverse sectors, toidentify fruitful areas for collaboration and novel andcreative ways to improve safety.
Embedding the social model approach will take time andwill build over the life of this Strategy.
We will explore with diverse sectors and the broader
community how we can all influence road safety
outcomes.
This will be through community clubs, workplaces,
organisations, and government agencies.
There is not a single correct approach. Although weknow the greatest gains are through systematic change
and public policy, we will also tap into the community
approach as we need a greater application of niche
solutions, the need to build change management into
acceptance of those solutions and take into account thelength of time it takes to achieve change.

The Strategy will only be successful
if all tiers of government, industry
and community organisations takeaction. We need to see change
and acceptance adopted outsideof, and in addition to, traditional
government road agencies.
Our partners and the broader
community need to be part of thechanging culture to accept roadsafety solutions.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

25

How we will work
National Road
Safety Strategy

Review and analysis by
the Office of Road Safety
and Australian Parliament

National Road
Safety Action Plan

Implementation

Commonwealth, state,
territory and local governments

National Road Safety
Action Plan
The 9 priority areas will be supported by a
5-year Action Plan, with agreed national
actions underpinned by safety performanceindicators.
Supporting the 3 themes and the 9 prioritiesof this Strategy is an enhanced governanceframework and performance management
and reporting system. This will ensure we are
implementing the measures that will make adifference and can adjust plans in responseto changes in priority and emerging issues.

26

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

Jurisdiction plans
and strategies

Accountability

Reporting on implementation

This is a Strategy owned by Infrastructure and Transport
Ministers, representing all jurisdictions together with theAustralian Local Government Association representing
the local government sector.

We will monitor progress towards several typesof measures:

Each jurisdiction is accountable for the delivery of thenational actions in the Action Plan. The Infrastructure
and Transport Senior Officials’ Committee is accountable
for monitoring the implementation of agreed actions andmanaging the process for adjustments in actions where
the evidence points to a need for change.
The Office of Road Safety, in the Australian Government
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional
Development and Communications is coordinating workwith states and territories and the Australian Local
Government Association on the implementation of theStrategy, including progress reporting on the fatality
and serious injury reduction outcome targets under theStrategy and action plans.
Review and analysis by the Australian Parliament andthe Office of Road Safety will be a key feature, taking
into account the successes achieved by 2025 to revisit
targets and changing modes of transport trends anduse, to provide an annual report to Infrastructure andTransport Ministers.

•

the headline trauma reduction targets•

a series of outcome indicators showing progress in
reducing key crash types and reducing trauma inparticular road user groups•

safety performance indicators focusing on the systemof the future we want to see, including transformationand incremental improvements of the system.

The Data Hub will focus on how effective infrastructure
investment and other countermeasures are in delivering
reductions in deaths and serious injuries. It will also help
us to understand the national picture of what needs
to be focused on, especially in areas where insight iscurrently limited.
The Data Hub will develop a centralised data
management facility, enhancing the capability to analyse
data at a national level and enabling measurement of
national safety performance indicators. This need todevelop evidence-based outputs from a central data
facility will support timely decision-making and helpalign with good governance around accountability
and transparency.
The Office of Road Safety, together with states andterritories, will report annually on the progress of priorities
outlined in this Strategy and Action Plan.

Keeping the Strategy
relevant
We will conduct a mid-term review of theStrategy and redirect or refine the priorities
to make sure the focus is where it needs
to be.
The first Action Plan is for a 5-year term.
This will allow funding commitments to bemade towards concrete and deliverable
actions with safety performance indicators.
It will be important to keep all our nationalroad safety efforts aligned with changes tothe environment and technologies, and thespecific priorities in each state and territory
strategy and action plan, while remaining
alert to emerging issues.

National Road
Safety Strategy

Annual Reporton progressNational Road
Safety Action Plan

Implementation

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

27

Roles and responsibilities
All levels of government in Australia have responsibilities for road safety, both within the transport sector and more
broadly in other sectors that influence safety outcomes.

Infrastructure and Transport Ministers, together
with the Australian Local Government Association,
have oversight of this Strategy.
••

Within each government, cabinet ministers are
responsible for reaching across portfolios so thatgovernments take a holistic approach to achieving
better road safety outcomes.

•

The Office of Road Safety coordinates road safety
efforts at a national level and acts as a catalyst for
cultural change in road safety across Australia. The
Office of Road Safety implements and manages
a range of road safety projects and programs
to address the road safety priorities identified inthis Strategy, working closely with all levels ofgovernment and industry, Austroads, the National
Transport Commission, the National Heavy Vehicle
Regulator, and the Australia New Zealand Policing
Advisory Agency. It has responsibility for the Data
Hub and monitoring and reporting on progress
and implementation of the Strategy. The Office ofRoad Safety engages regularly with stakeholders,industry and community organisations and works
across Australian Government agencies to achieve awhole-of-government approach.

•Australian Government road infrastructure
investments including planning, design andconstruction, are guided by the objective of a landtransport network that is safer and more secure forusers, by having regard for Safe System principles
and treatments and aligned to this Strategy.

•

The Australian Government also has a role investingin targeted road safety programs, including theRoad Safety Program (infrastructure), Road Safety
Innovation Fund, the Road Safety Awareness andEnablers Fund, and ANCAP.

•

The Australian Government regulates safety
standards for new vehicles through ADRs,
harmonising those with international vehicle
regulations where possible, and gives consideration
to the adoption of international vehicle regulations of
the United Nations World Forum for Harmonizationof Vehicle Regulations. The Australian Government
also participates in the United Nations Global Forumfor Road Traffic Safety, which has responsibility for
initiating and pursuing actions aimed at reinforcing
and improving road safety.

•

The Australian Government has a national
coordination role in relation to the health system. This
Strategy is aligned with the National Injury Prevention
Strategy 2021–2030, which seeks to reduce the rateand severity of injury within Australia, including fromroad crashes.

•

The Australian Government also has a key role insupporting research, pilots and trials.

Infrastructure and Transport Ministers have oversight ofa number of other important related national initiatives:–

the National Policy Framework for Land Transport
Technology and National Land Transport
Technology Action Plan 2020-2023–

the National Freight and Supply Chain Strategy
and associated National Action Plan–

the National Freight Data Hub–

the National Remote and Regional Transport
Strategy–

the National Rail Level Crossing Committee.

All tiers of government to work
together to deliver a national
approach to road safety for allroad users.

28

The Australian Government regulates safety
standards for new vehicles and allocatesinfrastructure resources across the national
highway and local road networks.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

State and territory governments invest in andoperate the road networks.
•

State and territory government road infrastructure
investments, including planning, design andconstruction, are guided by an objective – a landtransport network that is safer and more secure forusers, by having regard for Safe System principles
and treatments and aligned to this Strategy.

•

State and territory governments are responsible
for funding, planning, designing and operating saferoad networks, including speed management which
incorporates setting safe and appropriate speed
limits and ensuring they are complied with. They are
responsible for implementing the guidelines set by
Austroads, and maintenance of their road networks.

•

State and territory governments manage vehicle
registration and driver licensing systems, set the roadrules, and are responsible for police enforcement andcompliance.

••

State and territory governments also regulate
WHS in their jurisdictions and have responsibilities
in the health sector for public hospitals andemergency services.

National bodies supported collectively bygovernments also have responsibilities forroad safety.
•

The National Transport Commission leads nationaltransport reform in support of Australian governments
to improve safety, productivity, environmental
outcomes and regulatory efficiency, for example theAustralian Road Rules model legislation.

•

Austroads is responsible for conducting researchand providing advice, information, tools and services
to assist in delivery of safe, efficient and reliablemobility. These include national guidelines for thedesign, building and maintenance of road networks.
Austroads also provides national services that helptransport agencies to operate seamlessly acrossstate borders and bring national efficiencies totheir operations.

•

The Australia New Zealand Policing Advisory Agency
is responsible for providing advice on current andemerging policing priorities and cross-jurisdictional
coordination, for example through co-chairing the
National Drug Driving Working Group.

•

The National Heavy Vehicle Regulator is Australia’s
independent regulator for all vehicles over 4.5 tonnes
gross vehicle mass, delivering a comprehensive rangeof services under a consistent regulatory framework.

•

Safe Work Australia develops national policy relating
to WHS.

State and territory governments are responsible forsupporting research, pilots and trials.

Local governments are responsible for funding,planning, designing and operating the road
networks and footpaths in their local areas.
•

Local governments engage closely with theircommunities on the use and design of roads andpublic spaces.

•

Local governments also develop planning andlocal law regulations for local areas – such as local
area speed limits and path-use rules and pursue
community health and wellbeing programs/initiatives,linked to state and national initiatives.

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

29

Acronyms

30

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

ABS

Australian Bureau of Statistics

ADRs

Australian Design Rules

ANCAP

Australasian New Car Assessment Program

CBD

Central Business District

NACTO

National Association of City Transportation Officials

PDF

Portable Document Format

WHS

Work Health and Safety

National Road Safety Strategy / 2021–30

31

National Road
Safety Strategy
2021–30
Further informationwww.roadsafety.gov.au