THE VIKINGS IN
BRITTANYby

NEIL S. PRICEVIKING SOCIETY FOR NORTHERN RESEARCH
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON

1989© 1989 Neil S. Price.
ISBN: 978 0 903521 22 2This work was published simultaneously as The Vikings in Brittany by Neil S.
Price (Viking Society for Northern Research, University College London, 1989)
and as Saga-Book XXII 6 (1989). Consequently, there is double pagination: pp.
1–122 for the former, pp. 319–440 for the latter.

Reprinted 2001, 20012 by Short Run Press Limited, Exeter

CONTENTS

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................

page
5/323

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................

7/325

INTRODUCTION..........................................................

9/327

1. DOCUMENTARY SOURCES

13/331SCANDINAVIAN SOURCES..................................

13/331CAROLINGIAN AND BRETON SOURCES .............

14/332NORMAN SOURCES.............................................

17/335ANGLO-SAXON, IRISH AND WELSH SOURCES ....

18/336

2. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: FRANCE IN THE
VIKING AGE

21/339THE FIRST RAIDS: 799-856 ...................................

21/339THE ASSAULT ON FRANCE: 856-892 ....................

28/346

THE PEACE OF ALAIN THE GREAT: 892-907 ........

37/355

THE CONQUEST AND OCCUPATION OF
BRITTANY: 907-939....:.........................................

39/357

THE LAST OF THE VIKINGS: 939-1076 ..................

52/3703. ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

54/372

FORTIFICATIONS................................................

55/373

PLACE-NAMES....................................................

63/381

BURIALS.............................................................

64/382WEAPONS............................................................

72/390

MONASTERIES, RURAL SETTLEMENTS ANDCOMMERCE........................................................

75/393NORMANDY........................................................

77/395

4/322

Saga-Book
PRANKISH FINDS IN SCANDINAVIA....................

84/402

4. CONCLUSION: BRITTANY IN THE VIKING WORLD

85/403

THE KINGDOM OF YORK ....................................

87/405

CELTIC BRITAIN: WALES, CORNWALL AND
SCOTLAND..........................................................

89/407IRELAND.............................................................

91/409APPENDIX 1: GAZETTEER OF SCANDINAVIANSITES AND FINDS IN BRITTANY AND NORMANDY ..

94/412APPENDIX 2: REGNAL LISTS AND TABLES ................. 102/420
NOTES......................................................................... 104/422
BIBLIOGRAPHY AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................... 105/423
INDEX......................................................................... 116/434

LIST OF FIGURES

1 Early Medieval Brittany .............................................

10/3282 The territories of the later Carolingian Empire ...............

11/3293 The campaigns of Godfred, son of Haraldr, 851-855 ........

27/345

4 Seine Viking activity 841-861, and the movements of

Sidrocand Bfom.................................... ...................

30/3485 Weland's campaigns in north-western France, 859-863 .....

31/3496 The Loire Vikings, 843-866 .........................................

33/351

7 The Loire Vikings 866-882, and the campaigns ofHasteinn..................................................................

35/3538 Seine Viking campaigns in Brittany, 889-891 ..................

37/3559 The Church in Brittany from the eighth to tenth centuries

41/35910 The Loire Vikings, 886-917 .........................................

43/361

11 The career of Rognvaldr and the occupation of Brittany,
919-925...................................................................

45/36312 The return of Alain Barbetorte and the dispersal of theLoire Vikings, 930-939...............................................

48/36613 Memorial crosses erected on the sites of two Breton
victories over the Scandinavians, at Plourivo in 936 andQuestembert in 888 ...................................................

49/36714 Viking raids from Normandy, 941-960...........................

53/37115 Scandinavian sites and finds in Brittany .........................

55/373

16 Camp de Peran, plan of excavations .............................

57/37517 Profiles across the ramparts of the Camp de Peran ..........

58/37618 Section H-H through the rampart and ditch at the Campde Peran, with plan of the excavated area ......................

59/37719 Coin of St. Peter minted at York c. 905-925, found at

theCampdePiran....................................................

60/378

6/324

Saga-Book

20 Lance ferrule and possible helmet fragment found at theCampde Peran.........................................................

60/37821 Location plan of the earthworks at Trans .......................

61/37922 The topography of early medieval Nantes ......................

63/381

23 The He de Groix, showing contours and location of thebarrow....................................................................

65/38324 Plan of the He de Groix ship burial ..............................

66/38425 The swords and scabbard chape from the He de Groix
ship burial ...............................................................

67/385

26 Axes, arrowheads and lanceheads from the He de Groix
ship burial ...............................................................

68/38627 A selection of shield bosses from the He de Groix shipburial......................................................................

69/38728 Iron cauldron, bronze vessels and chain from the lie deGroix ship burial.......................................................

70/38829 Tools from the He de Groix ship burial .........................

71/38930 Jewellery, fittings, belt equipment, gaming pieces and aclench nail from the lie de Groix ship burial ..................

72/39031 The stern ornament from the He de Groix ship, and theship depicted on the stone from Smiss, Stenkyrka, on
Gotland...................................................................

73/39132 The controversial lancehead from the He de Groix shipburial, the figure from the Bayeux Tapestry holding anangular object, and an angled wood-working chisel usedin shipbuilding..........................................................

74/39233 The excavated remains of the monastery on the He Lavret

76/39434 Part of the eleventh-century Breton village at Lann-Gouh
Melrand ..................................................................

78/39635 Scandinavian sites and finds in Normandy ......................

80/39836 Pots from Birka graves 24 and 151, comparable to thevessel from the Reville burial ......................................

81/39937 Coin of William Longsword (reigned c. 925-942) foundin the Mont-Saint-Michel hoard ...................................

83/401ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The original research for this paper formed the basis of my undergraduate
dissertation at University College London, submitted in May 1988. I
would like to thank my two supervisors, James Graham-Campbell andWendy Davies, for their advice, comments and encouragement throughout
my work on the Vikings in Brittany; I am particularly grateful to Professor
Davies for giving me proofs of her book Small Worlds in advance of
publication. I owe a special debt to Julia Smith who kindly allowed me
to read her recent PhD thesis on Carolingian Brittany, certain to become
the standard text when published. Gillian Fellows-Jensen generously gave
me copies of her review of Scandinavian place-names in Normandy, alongwith extensive information and valuable criticism. Jinty Nelson lent me
her translation of the Annales Bertiniani and in France, Anne NissenJaubert provided me with copious notes on the Camp de Peian excavations;both were much appreciated. My thanks are also due to University College
London for a grant to attend the Mondes Normandes conference at Caen
University in October 1987. I would also like to thank the following
people who helped me with my research in various ways: Martin Carver,
Helen Clarke, Jean-Louis Cros, John Dodgson, Richard Hall, Jim Lang,
Gustav Milne, Michael Miiller-Wille, Olaf Olsen, Julian Richards, Steve
Roskams, Pat Wallace and Martin Welch. Anthony Faulkes and theeditors of Saga-Book have saved me from many mistakes and given much
valuable criticism of the text, though neither they nor any of the other
scholars who gave so generously of their time and knowledge are responsible for what I have done with their advice. All errors, whether ofreferences or interpretation, are my own. My parents have been very
supportive throughout my studies and my father has now typed several
versions of this paper; my warm thanks to them both. Finally, it is apleasure to thank two friends, Lawrence Pontin and Phillip Emery (whoalso drew many of the figures, as credited in the text), without whose
company and conversation this paper would be much the poorer.

For Sabrina Rampersad

INTRODUCTIONHEN a selection of the objects from the great Viking shipburial on the He de Groix, off the south coast of Brittany,
was displayed at Caen in 1987, the accompanying text lamented
the fact that the most interesting Scandinavian finds in France camefrom a region where the Vikings played only un role passager.
That the Viking impact on Brittany should be considered fleetingis principally the result of a lack of detailed study coupled with adearth of excavated remains.
The first problem encountered by the student is that of nomenclature (cf. Page 1984-5, 308-9). It seems reasonable to use the term
'Vikings' to refer to the large numbers of Scandinavians who
descended on Europe in the ninth and tenth centuries in search ofloot and plunder, sustaining themselves by means of a life ofitinerant violence. It is to this category, which includes the Great
Army, that the majority of Scandinavians operating in Brittanybelong, hence the title of this paper. Wherever possible, nationalterms (Norwegians, Danes, etc.) will be employed to describe
these people, and a clear distinction will be drawn between Viking
raiders and those who chose to settle in the lands they had conquered. Part of the problem is the almost universal use in the
French sources of the term Normands to refer to Scandinavians;
to translate this as 'Normans' is misleading (the word has beenused in translating an annal written as early as 866, in Sawyer 1971,
128). In this paper the term refers only to the inhabitants of
the region of modern Normandy after the succession of WilliamLongsword c. 925.
Similarly, the geographical and chronological range needs to beclarified. Before the ninth century, early medieval Brittany proper
was the area west of the linguistic boundary dividing places with
Breton and Prankish names (i.e. the Franko-Breton March),
broadly corresponding to the course of the river Vilaine. Afterthat date, and certainly in a Viking context, Brittany extended toroughly its modern borders, incorporating the counties of Rennes
and Nantes. It must also be remembered that at times Breton
influence extended far into Neustria and Aquitaine. Turning tochronology, the first real Viking contact with Brittany comes inthe early ninth century and the major impact is over by 950.
Nevertheless, sporadic raiding continued late into the tenth century

WSaga-Book

10/328and Brittany was subject to a degree of Scandinavian influence via
the Duchy of Normandy well into the eleventh century. Such thenis the general chronological scope of this paper, though reference
will occasionally be made to relevant events at earlier and later
dates as appropriate.

Fig. 1.

Early Medieval Brittany (after Davies 1988)

Only two summaries of the subject have appeared in English inrecent years, both of which concentrate on the Carolingian Empire
and deal with the Vikings secondarily (McKitterick 1983; Smith
1985, by far the most detailed study to date). Furthermore, theactivities of the Vikings in Brittany have never been studied fromthe viewpoint of the invaders themselves; instead the Breton reaction has been stressed.
This paper attempts to redress the balance, examining different
aspects of the evidence in turn, in an effort to shine some lighton this neglected area of Viking studies. Firstly, the relevant
documentary material is reviewed and the manuscripts' relative
merits and accuracy discussed. In each case any political propaganda bias and possible scribal preoccupations are considered,along with the effect of the Viking incursions on the Breton
scriptoria.

The Vikings in Brittany

11/329SaxonyFRISIALOTHARINGIA
Austrasia

FRANCIA

BRITTANY

EAST PRANKISH
KINGDOMHEUSTR1A
Maine
AlsaceAnjou
Touraine

Alanannla
BURGUNDY

AQOITAINE
PoitouPROVENCE

3ASCONYSEPTIMANIASPANISH MARCH

Fig. 2. The territories of the later Carolingian Empire

Using the information from these documentary sources, theVikings in Brittany are studied against the historical backgroundof French ninth- to eleventh-century power politics. Such factors
as the growth of Breton independence and the great complexity of
the relationships between the different interests are also taken into
account: the opportunistic civil warfare that the Scandinavians
exploited at every level as the various factions formed allianceswith different Viking mercenary fleets, each with its own leadersand motives. Only by unravelling this tangled situation can the
Scandinavian impact on the Breton church and state be assessed.
In the third chapter the archaeological material is examined:
the corpus of Scandinavian sites and finds in Brittany, including
fortifications, burials and destruction levels at monasteries andsecular sites recorded as targets of Viking attacks. Along with

12/330

Saga-Book

weaponry dredged from the great arterial rivers of France, Neustrian towns and early Norman settlements are additionally studied
as possible analogues for gaps in the Breton archaeology. The
place-name evidence is also reviewed.
The evidence is then drawn together in a conclusion which
presents a new model for the Scandinavian involvement in Brittany, setting the area in its context of the wider Viking world
through comparison with contemporary Scandinavian operations
in England and the Celtic West. Particular emphasis is placed on
Wales, with which Brittany has interesting parallels, especiallyregarding the action of the Vikings as catalysts for political unity(albeit sometimes temporary) but with little archaeological impact.
Issues such as the dispersal of the last Viking mercenary armies,
the development of the Duchy of Normandy and the Bretons' rdle
in European politics are also considered. Finally, two appendicesprovide a gazetteer of Scandinavian sites and finds in Brittany andNormandy and lists of contemporary rulers.

1.

DOCUMENTARY SOURCESHAVE grouped the documentary sources for early medieval
Scandinavian activity in France into four broad categories:
material from Scandinavia itself, Carolingian and Breton sources,
early Norman manuscripts and insular sources (Anglo-Saxon, Irish
and Welsh). These are discussed in turn below and their relevanceto the Breton situation assessed. While lack of space precludes adetailed analysis of each work it is nevertheless possible to outline
briefly any reservations that should be borne in mind concerning
their objectivity and accuracy. Of necessity, some of the more
peripheral references are discussed in later sections as they arise.

1

Scandinavian sources
Among the contemporary written sources from Scandinavia(runic inscriptions on memorial stones, pieces of bone and fragments of wood) there are several references to 'the land of theFranks', usually as the scene of past battles, but no specific mentions of Brittany. We must therefore look to the later medieval
sources, in particular the corpus of Icelandic sagas.
Any search for saga references is frustrated by problems ofterminology. Several sagas mention Bretland but it is uncertain
whether this refers to Brittany, Wales or even sometimes the small
kingdom of Strathclyde: the inhabitants of all these areas may havebeen regarded as 'Welsh' by the Scandinavians, and it is entirely
possible that the saga-writers themselves, reliant on earlier material, were not clear on the matter either. This problem is compounded by the usual uncertainties of saga information due to its
Christian context and late date.
Brennu-Njdls saga, written in the late thirteenth century by an
unknown author, mentions raids in Bretland by Kari and theNjalssons (1954, chapter 89). Both incidents occur in the late tenthcentury, though the internal chronology of the saga is inconsistent.
Several references to Bretland in Orkneyinga saga, c. 1200 (1965,
chapter 8, 15, 39, 40 and 78) are almost certainly concerned with
Wales (see also Magnuss saga skemmri 1965, chapter 3 and 4 andMagnuss saga lengri 1965, chapter 9 and 10). Jdmsvikinga saga ismore useful, though cryptic. Tenth-century Vikings are described14/332

Saga-Book

as successively ruling and apportioning Bretland, and a man called
Bjgrn inn brezki is mentioned (Jomsvikinga saga 1969, chapter 13;
see also Ashdown 1930, 184). While Bretland may simply be aconvenient faraway place in the context of the saga, it does at leastindicate that a Bretland colony was not thought unrealistic bymedieval Scandinavians. Similarly, in HallfreSr vandraedaskald's
dirge for 6lafr Tryggvason, Olafr is given the epithet of Breta
stridir (Oldfsdrdpa 11); again, this may refer to the Welsh, sinceSnorri Sturluson mentions 6lafr raiding in Wales (Snorri Sturluson
1941-51, Oldfs saga Tryggvasonar chapter 30). Heimskringla contains several other references to raids on Bretland (Snorri Sturluson
1941-51, Harolds saga ins hdrfagra chapter 32 and 33; tildfs sagains helga chapter 98 and Harolds saga Sigurdarsonar chapter 76)
including one led by Eirikr blod0x (Snorri Sturluson 1941-51,
Hdkonar saga goda chapter 4). 1
By far the most detailed reference is contained in Sighvatr
I>6rdarson's Vikingarvisur, written in the first half of the eleventh
century and the main source for the early life of St. 6lafr, before
he became king. The place-name forms and syntax suggest thatthe version of the poem that we have is an early one, and thus acontemporary source. Olafr is described as fighting a battle in
Hringsfjordr, an unidentified place on the Breton coast, before
raiding a stronghold held by Vikings at Hoi, thought to be Dol(Sighvatr PorSarson 1981, 118-19; Fell 1981).
Although all these sources make only brief mention of Brittany(and it is worth stressing that none of them is unequivocal) they
are none the less important contributions if an attempt is to bemade to recover the Scandinavian point of view. The relative valueof these sources has been discussed further by d'Haenens (1969,244-5).

Carolingian and Breton sources
The bulk of the historical information is to be found in thiscategory of source material. The documents may be divided into
contemporary and non-contemporary records and consist of annals, chronicles, hagiographies, religious texts (sermons and liturgical documents), poems, diplomas, edicts, letters, monastic
cartularies and ecclesiastical agreements. The earlier Breton genealogies (Fleuriot 1976) are not relevant in this context.
The viewpoint of the Imperial rulers is presented in the Annales

The Vikings in Brittany

15/333

Regni Francorum, compiled as a court product following Charlemagne's move to Aachen in 794. Based on oral reports or occasionally personal experience, the Annales highlight the problems ofaccurate long-distance communications within the Empire (Nelson
1981,15-36). Notwithstanding their obvious bias towards the Carolingian throne, the Annales are a vital source for ninth-century
Europe and even provide information about Scandinavia, such as
one of the earliest records of Danish kingship. Following on
directly are the Annales Bertiniani (the name simply refers to theorigins of a later copy), written by Prudentius from 835 to 861 andcontinued by Hincmar until 882. These annals are fully discussed
by Janet Nelson (1981, especially 18-24) who reviews their limitations and rejects the suggestion that Hincmar may have usedthem to set out guidelines for royal behaviour. Suffice to say herethat they are written objectively with no attempt to place eventsin any order of importance, and in measured language giving
precise detail. We may be sure that exact distinctions are intended
when the Annales record that the Vikings raided, sacked or burned
a settlement (Wallace-Hadrill 1975b, 221). The growing preoccupation with Scandinavian attacks throughout the ninth century
would seem to reflect the worsening situation accurately, and it
must be remembered that Hincmar's first-hand experience of sucha raid in 882, which might be expected to prejudice his account,occurs at the end of his time as annalist. The Annales Bertiniani
may be regarded as one of our chief sources.
One of the major sources not only for the Vikings but for
Brittany in general is the Cartulary of the Abbey of Redon. This
contemporary document survives in an eleventh-century manuscript (discussed in detail in de Courson's 1863 translation, i-vi)
and gives a wealth of reliable information as to the legal system,
social hierarchy, land organisation and partition of early medieval
Brittany in its records of 'the sales, mortgages, grants and disputesthat affected . . . properties before they were absorbed by [themonastery of] Redon' (Davies 1988, 1). It is the primary source
for the complex administrative system and multi-tiered power
structure of this area of France (cf. Davies 1981; 1983 and 1988;
de la Borderie 1898, 171-209).
The Chronicle of Nantes also contains much relevant information
for the later phases of Viking involvement in Brittany, but its
usefulness is limited by its non-contemporaneity. Composed c.
1050-1059, probably by a canon at Nantes cathedral drawing on
earlier annals now lost, the Chronicle has a clear ecclesiastical16/334

Saga-Book

bias and favours the community at Nantes; this is tempered by alucid, concise style free of literary pretensions. In spite of its
drawbacks, single events and secondary data may be sifted fromthe Chronicle with little difficulty provided that caution is exercisedwith regard to statistics that could profit from exaggeration, suchas the size of Scandinavian fleets. The Chronicle of Nantes isparticularly rich in references to secular fortifications and the stateof Breton defences in the face of Viking attack (cf. Privat 1971,
81-93; Jones 1981, 151-3).
The Annales and Historia Remensis Ecclesiae of Flodoard, acanon of Rheims who lived 893-966, are almost the only contemporary sources for the Viking occupation of Nantes and Brittanyin the early tenth century (see below), and as such are perhaps themost important of all. Although an understandable abhorrenceof the Scandinavians is present in Flodoard's work, he records
dispassionately and credits Viking victories without hesitation orapparent exaggeration in favour of the Bretons. He is the solesource for much vital information about the Nantes Vikings, including the names of their leaders (when later chronicles mention
them, they are ultimately derived from Flodoard). His account of
this period differs notably from that of Dudo of Saint-Quentin (seebelow), but a convincing case for Flodoard's accuracy has been
made by de la Borderie (1898, 373, 378-9) based on a detailed
study of terminology.
A particularly important contribution comes from hagiography
and other religious works. The later Breton saints' lives usuallyfollow the pattern of the Life of Saint Samson (Davies 1982a, 148),
probably dating to the later seventh century though Poulin (1978)
has suggested an early ninth-century date. Many saints' lives preserve contemporary accounts of the Vikings' depredations, such as
Bili's Life of Saint-Malo and Uurmonoc's heartfelt prayer, written
in 884, for the deliverance of Landevennec from the 'continual
incursions ... of these barbarians' (Uurmonoc XXI). However,the use of the saints' lives as vehicles for political propaganda
should be considered (cf. Poulin 1977, 14-18), especially during
the reigns of Nominoe and Salomon in the context of the archbishopric of Dol and its implications for Breton independence (Smith
1982). Scandinavian raids are also the subject of some of themiracles associated with saints' relics, as in the Miracula Sancti
Bertini which contain heavily embroidered accounts from which
details of Viking movements in Brittany must be extracted. Although these texts emphasise the plight of Christianity and theThe Vikings in Brittany

17/335destruction of monasteries, some, such as Ermentarius's recordsof the translation of Saint Philibert's remains from Noirmoutier,preserve a degree of objectivity and use distinctive terms to describe
the actions of the Vikings in the same way as the Annales Bertiniani(Wallace-Hadrill 1975b, 222).
Cartularies from the abbeys at Landevennec, Saint-Bertin, SaintCroix de Quimperle and the cathedral at Angers together with the
Gesta Conwoionis Abbatis Rotonensis also contain intermittent
references to the Vikings, but have a rather narrow outlook, being
preoccupied with their own foundations.
Among the lesser, but still valuable, sources are the Annales
Fuldenses, Annales Vedastini and Annales Xantenses. All are
primarily concerned with the Empire itself rather than with Brittany; indeed following the siege of Paris the Annales Vedastini are
the primary source for Carolingian affairs until 900. Despite eachmanuscript having its own localised bias (especially the latter pair),insights into the complex political alliances engineered by the
Vikings and the Carolingians may still be obtained, together withdetails of the resulting campaigns. The Annales Engolismenses
preserve similar information, particularly for the earlier raids
and Scandinavian activity along the Empire's coasts in the ninth
century. Regino of Priim's Chronicon also records contemporary
Viking attacks, but the facts need to be sieved from a slightly
dramatised description of events. Hugh of Fleury occasionallymentions Brittany in his chronicle of the Prankish kings, as does
Gregory of Tours much earlier (a useful background to FrankoBreton relations at the start of the Viking Age), but both confine
themselves to brief references to secular politics.

Norman sources
The only Norman source that directly concerns us is Dudo ofSaint-Quentin's Historia Normannorum, written in the period 10151026 and heavily criticised by most modern scholars. His accountis a history of the early dukes of Normandy and their activities,
written for the court and stressing the legitimacy of their claim to
power. Obviously the accuracy of any work composed for such a
purpose is open to question, but it has been recently argued that
Dudo did not intend to record facts but instead to write a 'lineage
history', in effect a Norman 'saga' incorporating identifiable literarymotifs (Searle 1984,121-2,134). This may then be used to give us

18/336

Saga-Book

the Normans' view of themselves, 'the pattern of their present
polity and of their destiny' (Searle 1984, 137). While this is undoubtedly of great value it does not assist the student of the earlier
period that Dudo writes about. He gives a description of the Viking
occupation of Brittany and its end, discussed fully in chapter 2,
which is completely at odds with that of Flodoard and stresses
the intervention of the Norman duke. Dudo's chronology andinterpretation have been examined in some detail by de la Borderie(1898, 373-80) and demonstrated to be false. His account is notcomplete fiction however, simply a distortion of reality, and his
history contains many important items of information. A further
insight into the nature of his work and the atmosphere of theNorman court can be gained from a study of his contemporary, thepoet Gamier of Rouen (cf. Musset 1954b, 247-8). Thus while
Dudo's records may be used, great care must be taken.

Anglo-Saxon, Irish and Welsh sources
Considering English sources first, a wealth of information about
the Vikings may be obtained from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.
Although essentially an 'official' history of the Wessex dynasty,
the Chronicle gives plausible details about the campaigns of theGreat Army in the late ninth century: its wars with the English
and its movements on the Continent. The Chronicle's treatmentof the size and logistics of the Viking threat has been analysed at
length in recent years (notably by Sawyer 1971,123-32 and Brooks1979) and is of great importance for the understanding of the
Scandinavian impact on Brittany in the ninth century, since thearmy concerned is the same but seen from a different perspective.
While the same reservations apply to Asser's Life of King Alfred,this is less concerned with the Scandinavians and instead offers
insights into the relationship of Brittany to England, examined inchapter 2.
Relevant source material is also found in Celtic Britain and
Ireland with both direct and indirect references. The various Irish
annals, especially those of Ulster, Clonmacnoise and the Four
Masters, frequently place their emphasis on Scandinavian activities
outside Ireland (cf. MacNiocaill 1975). Particularly close links
existed between the Norse and Danish colonies of Dublin andYork, and the politics of the Irish Sea certainly affected those
Vikings travelling to or occupying Brittany (though with less harm-

The Vikings in Brittany

19/337

ful long-term consequences than the Dubliners' preoccupation
with external affairs; cf. 6 Corrdin 1972, 104). Among the more
vexing problems is that of Ragnarr Io9br6k, the great Viking
chieftain whose very existence is questionable and whose 'sons'are recorded as leading elements of the Great Army in the AngloSaxon Chronicle and elsewhere. Although the Viking forces withwhich Ragnarr and his 'sons' are associated are central to any studyof Scandinavian contact with Brittany, detailed debate as to theirinvolvement or existence is regrettably beyond the scope of thispaper (for the main arguments see Smyth 1975; 1977; 1979; 6
Corrain 1977-8; McTurk 1976). Interesting parallels exist between
the situations in early medieval Ireland and Brittany, for in bothregions the animosity felt towards the Scandinavian invaders by
the indigenous people simply confused the existing state of civil
hostility, as reflected in the frequent use made of the Vikings as
mercenaries by the natives in their power struggles. It is noticeable
that the Irish sources do not employ defamatory epithets whendescribing Scandinavian forces as frequently as do contemporary
European documents. Comparisons have also been made between
the Irish social structure based on the ri and tuath and the Icelandicsocial system built around the godar, while there is a remarkablesimilarity between the complex Irish law codes and the Icelandic
laws, especially those governing killing (Sawyer 1982b). As with
Ireland, the main Scandinavian influence on Brittany came from
Norway - thus the nature of Hiberno-Norse relations is of particular importance.
As mentioned above, Wales has particularly interesting parallels
with Brittany. Links between the two regions will be explored inlater chapters using evidence from the saints' lives and charters(cf. Davies 1982b), such as those from Llandaff (Davies 1982a,
192). Apart from the Annales Cambriae, no continuous chronicle
survives for early Welsh history such as does for example inWessex, so we must rely on contemporary Irish and Anglo-Saxon
sources together with later Welsh authors like Giraldus Cambrensis who must be used with great care. An exception is theArmes Prydein, the 'Prophecy of Britain', a poem which describes
a looked-for alliance of all the Celtic realms and the Dublin Norse
who will rise up against Anglo-Saxon rule. Its date is disputed but
it is generally agreed to be mid-to-late ninth century, the problem
being its relationship to /Ethelstan's Brunanburh campaign of 937
and the later wars with Eirikr blod0x in the 950s. These issues are
discussed in chapter 2, since the poem's references to Brittany are
illuminating in a Viking context.

20/338

Saga-Book

The final primary source to consider is not a document at
all, but is nevertheless appropriate to this chapter: the Bayeux
Tapestry. Embroidered shortly after the conquest of England, theTapestry depicts in its earlier sections Duke William's campaign
against Conan II of Brittany and shows several Breton towns andfortifications at Dinan, Dol and Rennes. These pictures obviously
provide useful references for the earlier period too, and some of
the artefacts illustrated have been cited as parallels for items in
the Breton archaeological assemblages (cf. Wilson 1985, 175,
discussed below). In addition, while the objectivity of the Tapestry
is open to question in view of its nature as a celebration andconfirmation of Norman power, the contemporary scenes of daily
life and military exercises are unimpeachable.
In conclusion, a few words should be said about the effect of
the Scandinavian raids on the Breton scriptoria. Before the Viking
attacks began, Brittany had a tradition of fine illumination (cf.
Wormald 1977; Morey, Rand and Kraeling 1931) and was a centreof book production with recorded transmissions of manuscripts toWales and possibly England (Davies 1982a, 215). Foci of learningand culture existed at Lehon, Redon and Dol (cf. Perin and Feffer
1985, 449; Riche 1985), while neighbouring Neustria also enjoyedfar-reaching fame for the quality of its book decoration (Mutherich1985) and literary invention (Fontaine 1985), with twenty scriptoria
divided among the bishoprics and monasteries (Vezin 1985). Following the initial impact of the ninth-century raids, however, bookproduction dwindled and eventually ceased as the monasteries
were sacked and burned. The saints' relics and shrines, once
thought to be protection enough against attack as at Paris in 886(a notion reinforced by rewritten saints' lives), were given priority
for evacuation in the face of an onslaught thought by some to be
an instrument of divine judgement (Riche 1969,709). By 882 books
were eagerly sought as the raids escalated in the late ninth century,
an escalation reflected in the great exodus of church possessions
and clergy (discussed in chapter 2, but see Chedeville and Guillotel
1984, 379-89; Wallace-Hadrill 1975b, 222-6). Many relics andmanuscripts came to southern England where there is evidence ofseveral Breton saints' cults. A similar situation existed in Neustria,
where no'monasteries at all remained by the time of Rollo (GpnguHrolfr) (c. 911-925); the relationship of the Breton and Neustrianchurches during this decline is discussed by le Patourel (1944,
137). The resulting dearth of late ninth- and tenth-century Breton
records has been noted above, and did not begin to be reversed

The Vikings in Brittany

21/339until Alain Barbetorte's restoration of the monasteries after 939,
when a new cultural lead was taken from the Prankish and Latin
traditions.

2. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: FRANCE IN THE
VIKING AGE
Although the existing documentary record has been subject bothto intentional and accidental distortion by contemporary scribes,
and to the arbitrary bias of manuscript survival, it is still possible
to construct a fairly coherent, if broad, scheme of events and raids
over the ninth and tenth centuries in France; this may then becompared with the archaeological evidence reviewed in chapter 3.
In trying to avoid a relentless chronological narrative I have divided
the period from the beginning of the ninth century to the end of
the eleventh into five phases. Though each phase characterises a
different general aspect of Scandinavian operations in France, witha specific reference to Brittany, it is important to realise that thisis an imposition of artificial divisions on to a continuous historicalsequence. The activities of the dozens of Scandinavian fleets andcommanders present in France during this period, considered individually below, were obviously not restricted by any such chronological distinctions. Indeed, the need to consider separately the
movements, objectives, composition and leadership of the various
Scandinavian groups usually classified collectively as 'Vikings' is
not only the central theme of this paper but is also vital if we areto understand the complex relationship of Brittany to the Prankish
and Scandinavian worlds. 2

The first raids: 799-856
The eve of the ninth century saw the culmination of a series ofCarolingian campaigns against Brittany, dating back to the sack ofVannes by Pippin HI in 753, possibly an attempt to pacify the
Bretons after a failed invasion in 748. (The date of Pippin's campaign is disputed; see Smith 1986 for a full discussion.) After a
Prankish army led by the hero Roland had been sent into Brittanyin 778, Franko-Breton hostility had intensified, with, another invasion in 786 by Audulf (ARF 786). In 799, this resulted in theconquest of the whole region by Wido 'as had never been done

22/340

Saga-Book

before' (ARF 799). In the early years of the ninth century the
Franks launched several further consolidatory campaigns, notablyin 811 by one of four Carolingian armies in the field that year
(Verbruggen 1967, 428), and by Louis the Pious in 818. Following
the rebellion of the Breton leaders Morvan and Wilhomar, Louisordered additional expeditions against Brittany from Vannes andRennes in 822, 824 and 825 (McKitterick 1983, 242). The friction
between the Franks and Bretons, and the numerous Carolingianinterventions in the area, had several causes. In part, the Carolingians were suppressing raids into Prankish territory, but more
importantly perhaps, in doing so they were reviving earlier Merovingian claims to the region and extending the power of the Empire.
Military gains along the Breton march had been consolidated by
the granting of monastic estates there, which acted as both a buffer
to Breton aggression and a convenient excuse for further Prankish
campaigns to protect them. The role of the Prankish church in theattempted subjugation of Brittany was matched by aristocratic
involvement, fostered through family connections (for example,
from 813 to 822 the count of Vannes appears to have been thebrother of Lambert of Anjou; see Davies 1981).
799, the year of Wido's initial conquest of Brittany, was a doubly
significant one in that it also saw the first recorded Viking raid on
Gaul, in the Vendee region, and thus the introduction of a new,
extra-systemic factor into the politics of the Empire. 3 Following
the first Scandinavian attacks, Charlemagne reacted by ordering
the defence of Aquitaine in 800, and built a fleet to protect theElbe eight years later. Until the 830s raids on France were scarce,
although in 820 a small fleet of thirteen ships attacked Flanders
and the Seine estuary before moving on to the Vend6e coast (ARF
820; Hill 1981, 33), possibly using an island near Noirmoutier as
a temporary base as they had done in 819 (Davies 1988, 22). The
island of Noirmoutier itself became one of the major Viking seabases in France by the mid ninth century, and by 830/831 themonks of the monastery there had been forced to construct a
castrum to defend themselves against the Scandinavians(Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 253).
At about this time, a Breton called Nominee was appointed as
imperial representative in Brittany by Louis the Pious and appears
to have been accepted by the populace as well as remaining loyal
to the emperor. During the early years of Nominee's office Viking
attacks on Noirmoutier became so severe that between 834 and836 the whole monastic community evacuated the island, taking

The Vikings in Brittany

23/341

with them the relics of Saint Philibert (AE 836; see Ermentarius
for an account of their journey). It is, however, worth stressingthat the only records of Scandinavian raids on Brittany itself prior
to 843 come from the eleventh-century Chronicle of Nantes. Until
838, Frisia had been the focus of Viking activity in western Europe,
coming under constant attack by a large Danish fleet. Efforts tofortify the coasts against them had failed in 835, as had an abortivesiege of the Vikings' base on Walcheren Island (AB 837); thetrading centre of Dorestad was burned four times and the whole
region laid waste (AF 835-7; AB 834-7; the Vikings in Frisia are
discussed by Braat 1954). In 838, this same Danish fleet, probably
composed of exiles from the Danish power struggles with Horik(cf. AB 836; papers by Olsen, Lebecq and Sawyer given at the1987 Societ6 d'Archeologie M6dievale conference at Caen), waswrecked by a storm off the Frisian coast (AB 838).
In 840, Louis the Pious died, an event with great repercussions
for Brittany and the Carolingian Empire. The following year a
massive Viking fleet sailed up the Seine, burning Rouen, Jumieges
and several monasteries, and taking many captives (AB 841). They
then sailed to the Loire estuary to meet with heavy resistance fromCount Renaud, after the new emperor, Charles the Bald, hadordered the nobles of the Loire to organise their defences(Ch6deville and Guillotel 1984, 258). Coinciding with this phaseof Viking aggression (in 842 a second fleet destroyed the northerncoastal emporium of Quentovic in collaboration with Prankishtraitors (AB 842)) the strained military capacity of the Empire
made it possible for Nominoe to lead the Bretons in revolt against
Carolingian rule. Count Reynald of Nantes was killed by Nominee's son, Erispoe, and Bretons fought alongside Saxons andGascons at the battle of Worms (Verbruggen 1967, 425; for a
discussion of Bretpn military tactics see Nicolle 1984, 16).
In June 843, Nantes was attacked on the festival of Saint John
the Baptist by a Viking fleet operating in alliance with the rebellious Count Lambert (AB 843). The cathedral was stormed andBishop Gunhard slain with all his clergy and many of the citizens.
The fleet then continued up the Loire to sack the monasteries at
Indres and Vertou (see de la Borderie 1898, 310-14), northern
Poitou and back down along the coast of Aquitaine, wintering on
an island, perhaps Noirmoutier. The next year, 844, saw further
raiding by this same fleet, severe enough to bring Nominoe backfrom Le Mans, where he was campaigning against the Franks, inorder to fight the invaders (AB 844). The fleet withdrew, sailing24/342

Saga-Book

up the Garonne destroying everything as far as Toulouse. They
then turned south to Galicia, where they were driven back by
missile-throwing war machines (AB 844), wintering on the coastal
islands off Poitou.
The depredations of this fleet acted as a severe drain on Carolingian military resources, taxing Charles the Bald's ability to respondto such a mobile threat. In 845, the Scandinavian fleet which had
first appeared on the Seine four years earlier sent 120 ships upriverto Paris, exacting a Danegeld payment of 7000 pounds of silver
from the emperor. Taking advantage of Charles's weakness, Nominoe defeated a large Carolingian army at Ballon later in theyear (AB 845). The following year, 846, Charles, faced with raiding
all along the northern and western coasts of France, had no option
but to make peace with the Bretons. A growing threat was also
appearing in the far north, as the Danes consolidated their holdon Frisia after Horik of Denmark had sent a massive raiding force(the sources claim 600 ships, almost certainly a gross exaggeration)
up the Elbe against Louis the previous year, destroying Hamburg
after three battles (AF 845; AB 845-6).
In 847, Brittany suffered its worst raiding up to that time, as the
fleet of Vikings based on the coastal islands near the mouth of theLoire launched a major offensive. Nominoe and the Breton army
resisted, fighting three battles, but eventually the Scandinavians
were victorious (AB 847). Nominoe himself was forced to flee fora short time, but managed to buy the Vikings off — one of only
two occasions on which the Bretons paid Danegeld (Smith 1985).
The fleet then ravaged the coast of Aquitaine.
It is apparent that after 841 there were two main Scandinavian
fleets raiding in France, broadly based on the Seine and Loirerivers, though they recognised no fixed boundaries (for example,
the Seine Vikings fought on the Loire in 841). Those operating on
the Seine are usually referred to as Dani 'Danes' in the Annales
Bertiniani, in preference to the more common term Nordmanni'Norsemen' used for Scandinavians in general. This fleet did not
winter in France until 851, instead returning to Denmark. It wasprobably not a cohesive unit as such, rather a loose affiliation oflooters and pirates returning regularly to an area known to be aworthwhile target. The Loire fleet was very different, wintering
off the coast of Poitou and Aquitaine for three years after 843.
Only a few estimates of size are given in the sources for its early
activities, but between 67 and 80 vessels is likely (see Brooks 1979
for a comparison of Viking fleet sises). Nothing is known of theThe Vikings in Brittany

25/343change in composition of this fleet, if any, over these three years
but it seems probable that it acted as an effective, combined force
presumably under a nominal leadership and with at least a basic
command structure (the infrastructure of peripatetic Scandinavian
forces is discussed briefly below in relation to the Great Army andthe mercenary fleets of the 880s and 890s, and in more depth inPrice, forthcoming). As to the fleet's origins, the Annales Engolismenses call them Wesfaldingi, 'Westfoldings'(?), in 843, a statement supported by recent scholars (McKitterick 1983, 232). These
two armies, Danish and Norwegian, are henceforth referred to as
the Seine and Loire Vikings respectively. A third fleet, mentioned
above and operating along the Somme and in Frisia, also formed
an important factor in the mid ninth-century Prankish politicalsituation, acting as a constant threat and drain on resources thoughnever active on the west coast or in Brittany.
During this first phase of raiding, Nominoe had made strenuous
efforts to further Breton independence from Carolingian influence,
particularly that of the Prankish church. The details of this are
the subject of much debate. The establishment of the Redon
community in 832 during the reign of Louis the Pious may havebeen a deliberate element in this policy; the expulsion of four
Prankish bishops in 848 over the question of the Rule of SaintBenedict of Aniane, and their replacement with Breton clerics
seems unequivocal (CN 848; Bernier 1982, 109-11). Nominoe
apparently set up an archbishopric at Dol in an attempt to foster
an independent Breton church, though the see was not ratified by
Rome for several centuries, but there are still too many source
problems to be certain (see Smith 1982; for a discussion of Breton
religious institutions, see de la Borderie 1898,246-75). In addition
to his efforts to achieve ecclesiastical autonomy, Nominoe also
expanded Brittany's borders, gaining Rennes and Nantes from theFranks in 846, and raiding far into Anjou, the Venddmois and theBessin.
In 848 Charles managed to drive off a small fleet of Danes who
had been besieging Bordeaux (AB 848), but no further Viking
activity is recorded until 850. In that year the Annales Bertiniani
report that the Scandinavians began to fight amongst themselves.
The arrival of a new Danish leader in Frisia, Roric, the brother ofthe Haraldr who commanded the fleet raiding there in the 830s,
seems to have disrupted the balance of power among the FrisianVikings with a significant effect on north-western France. Having
previously served as a mercenary under both Louis and Lothar,26/344

Saga-Book

Roric began to ravage along the Rhine and Waal in 850; in
response, Lothar ceded Dorestad to him on the condition that hetook over the administration and resisted further Danish attacks,
thus granting the Scandinavians a major power-base in the north.
In the same year, Haraldr's son Godfred moved into the Seine andformed an alliance with Charles the Bald (AF 850; AB 850).
The following year, 851, Nominoe died and was succeeded byhis son Erispoe. Charles the Bald attempted a hasty invasion but
was defeated by Erispoe at the Battle of Jengland. As a result,
Rennes and Nantes were again ceded to the Bretons along with
the Pays de Retz. This may also have been an attempt to buy
Breton aid against the Viking threat from Noirmoutier, since inthe same year Charles had already had to drive back a Danishforce which had moved south from Frisia to sack Rouen, before
marching on foot to Beauvais (AB 851). To complicate the situation
still further, Charles also began actively to support Erispoe's
cousin, Salomon, against him. In 852, Charles went so far as togrant Salomon a third of Brittany.
The same year Haraldr was killed fighting in Frisia, and Godfred's fleet (recorded as 252 ships) was bribed to leave the region.
Ignoring this agreement, Godfred raided along the Scheldt andattacked settlements in Frisia before sailing down to the Seine. His
fleet was met by a combined Prankish army under Charles andLothar, and besieged (AB 852). It proved only a temporary halt
to Godfred's Vikings however, since the siege was lifted whenCharles was forced to leave in 853. The Danes sailed out into theopen sea and round the Breton peninsula into the Loire estuary,
where they sacked Nantes and Saint-Florent (AB 853; it is interesting that an entry written in 1054 in the Annals of Saint-Florent
attributes the destruction to Nominoe, see Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 230). Tours was also burned, though the monks of SaintMartin's had time to remove relics to Cormery (AB 853).
Godfred's fleet encamped on the He de Biece in the Loire at
Nantes. At this time, another Viking fleet (itself perhaps a subdivision of a larger force) under the command of Sidroc had arrived
at the mouth of the Loire. In desperation the Bretons agreed analliance with Sidroc's Vikings, the terms of which are not recorded,
and in 854 Sidroc and Erispoe attacked Godfred's camp with 105
ships. The Bretons suffered heavy casualties and were driven back(Smith 1985). The following day Sidroc betrayed the Bretons andallowed Godfred to sail up the Vilaine with 130 ships towards an
unprotected Redon. Sidroc led his fleet round the coast into the27/345

The Vikings in Brittany

Seine. Redon was saved by a sudden storm which wrecked someof Godfred's ships, but the remainder of the fleet disembarked toloot elsewhere in Brittany (CR 369, 21-2), taking many captives
including the bishop of Vannes.
In 855, Godfred withdrew to join his uncle Roric in Dorestad.
The previous year civil war had broken out in earnest in Denmark,causing many Danes to return home from Frisia (AF 854). The
resulting carnage wiped out almost the entire Danish ruling family,
including Horik himself (AB 854; for the Frisian politics see Sawyer
1982a, 87-8, 91, 98). Sidroc's Loire Vikings returned from the
Seine to attack Bordeaux, and were driven back to Nantes after
an abortive assault on Poitiers (AB 855).
The career of Godfred provides a convenient link with which toconclude this discussion of the first phase of raiding in France. The-p^ruxf » Frimia 851,852^^

joins Roric in Doratadt
855

Bite* 853

bwi.g.d by Sidroc•ixTlriipo.

Fig. 3. The campaigns of Godfred, son of Haraldr, 851-855

28/346

Saga-Book

only Viking commander known to have fought in Frisia,.on the
Seine and on the Loire, which can be considered the three foci for
Scandinavian operations in ninth-century western Europe, Godfred is an excellent example of a pirate chieftain of this period.
Like many of the Viking leaders, often described as 'kings' (reges
or regii) in Prankish sources, he was an exiled renegade from
Scandinavia's constant struggles for power, taking the opportunity
provided by foreign raiding to gain wealth and a following in a
way not possible before (earlier exiles had gone to Sweden or
Finland). Godfred's activities embody the role played by Scandinavians in France up to 856: peripatetic raiding over a large areawith a medium-sized fleet, with occasional over-wintering andoccupation of Prankish settlements, involvement in Scandinavian
politics, and shifting alliances with and against the Carolingians,
Bretons and other Viking fleets. The mid ninth century saw adramatic change in the Viking attitude to Europe.

The assault on France: 856-892

856 saw the beginning of one of the most intense periods ofScandinavian activity abroad in the ninth century. The simple
piratical operations carried out before were replaced by a carefullyplanned attack on the centres of wealth, settlement and trade,taking into account local topography and religious festivals when
the targets would be unprepared for defence: the 'Great Invasion'of 856-862 (McKitterick 1983, 234-5). This period particularly
highlights the extent to which the Vikings were involved in Prankish
politics, and the rivalries between Charles the Bald, the sons ofLouis the Pious, the disaffected Neustrian and Aquitanian nobles
and the Bretons.
In July 856, Charles the Bald was occupied fighting renegadecounts in Aquitaine and an alliance of the Loire Vikings and Pippin
II when news reached him of a combined Viking attack on Paris.
Sidroc had sailed up the Seine and joined forces with a second
Scandinavian fleet commanded by BJQrn at Pitres; continuing upriver to Paris, everything had been burned except for the churchesof Saints Germain-des-Pr6s, Denis, Stephen and Vincent which
had paid bribes to be spared. Charles reacted in October, launching
an offensive with Adalhard, Rudolf, Welf and Counts Ricoin,
Augier and Berengar. The Vikings were driven back to their winterbase on Oscelles island (AB 857 [856]). In addition to defending

The Vikings in Brittany

29/347Aquitaine and the Seine, Charles was faced with attacks from thewest. Orleans was sacked by a Danish host and Charles was forced
to cede Maine to the Bretons in return for a temporary allianceagainst the Vikings. The Carolingian position was so threatened
that Charles even attempted to gain English help against the
Scandinavians by marrying his daughter Judith to ^Ethelwulf ofWessex (a similar policy had been promoted by Charlemagne, see
Wallace-Hadrill 1967, 691-4; Hodges, 1981a, 224).
The following year, 857, Charles's support of Salomon in Brittany grew to fruition when Erispoe was assassinated in a church.
Although Salomon immediately seized control of Brittany, however, ostensibly as a Prankish vassal, he at once began to ally withanyone who would oppose Charles; notably Louis the Stammerer
and Robert the Strong of Neustria. Charles was unable to deal
successfully with a major raid on Tours and the surrounding
districts by the Loire Vikings, being simultaneously faced with a
Danish attack on Chartres during which Bishop Frotbald was killed(AB 857). In response to Charles's inability to defend the Seineand Loire, not surprising in the circumstances, Robert the Strong
and his supporters rebelled in 858. Charles the Bald formed analliance at Verberie with Bjgrn, one of the Seine Viking commanders who had fought at Paris two years earlier (AB 858). The
outcome of this alliance is not known, but Charles besieged theremaining Seine Vikings on Oscelles in July, after paying a massive
ransom to Sidroc for the abbot of Saint-Denis who had been
captured at Paris. Although joined by his nephew Lothar II after
tense negotiations, Charles was once again obliged to raise thesiege in September to quell a rebellion of Neustrian counts. The
revolt had been backed by Salomon in alliance with Louis theGerman (AB 858).
In 859, the Seine Vikings continued to raid widely, destroying
Noyon and Beauvais, killing bishop Immo and forcing the monks
to flee with the relics of Denis, Eleutherius and Rusticus. In thisyear too, a new threat to the Empire appeared in the north, as a
new Danish army arrived on the Somme under the command of
Weland. (Although Roric had sailed to Denmark in 857, Danes
had continued to raid in Frisia, attacking the Scheldt basin and
Saxony from their bases at Dorestad and Batavia.) Weland's fleet
laid waste Amiens and Saint-Valery-sur-Somme and wintered at
the mouth of the river (AB 859). The following year, 860, thisSomme fleet campaigned in England but Weland offered to returnand fight the Seine Vikings for Charles, provided he was paid 3000

Saga-Book

30/348pounds of silver and supplied with food and wine. Charles agreed,raising the money by levying a tax on church land (AB 860; Davies
1988, 57-8, 213). In the same year, another Danish fleet raided
along the Rhdne.

droc laad« Lair* VUcingi
against Saim Vikingt 8S4

Fig. 4. Seine Viking activity 841-861, and the movements of Sidroc and Bjorn

Weland returned from England with 200 ships in 861 and besieged the Seine Vikings on Oscelles, being joined later in theblockade by reinforcements of 60 ships which had sailed up the
Seine and Epte. After a payment of 6000 pounds of silver, however,Weland allowed the Seine Vikings to sail away and winter elsewhere on the river while his own Somme fleet made camp at SaintMeur-des-Fosses (AB 861). Paris was burned again by a Danish
fleet which also ravaged the Th6rouanne district.
In early 862 Charles the Bald changed his response to the Viking
raids from a reactive to a preventative basis (cf. Sawyer 1982a, 8891), initiating a programme of river fortifications to restrict accessfor the Scandinavian fleets. The Marne was blockaded at several
points, trapping Weland's ships at Trilbardon Bridge and forcing
them into Jumieges for repairs. In February, Weland formallysubmitted to Charles (AB 862), who then ordered the constructionof fortifications on the Seine. The remainder of Weland's vessels
split from his command and joined a small force of Vikings on the
Loire, which had hitherto been raiding in Spain. This combined
fleet was hired for a reported 6000 pounds of silver by Robert

The Vikings in Brittany

31/349the Strong who was now campaigning against Salomon, 'before
Salomon could ally with them against him' (AB 862), a salutary
reminder of the changeability of Viking loyalties. Salomon responded by hiring 12 ships of Loire Vikings who had been troubling
southern Brittany (CR 121, 269-70).
After 862 the pressure of raids on France eased for a short time.
Weland, since 859 the principal Viking commander in France, waskilled in a duel in 863. Salomon made peace with Charles in thesame year, acknowledging his power and receiving land grants
between the Mayenne and the Sarthe in return, as well as being
made lay abbot of Saint-Aubin of Angers. The Viking threat wasconcentrated in the north, in Frisia, as Dorestad was sacked again
and a Danish fleet sailed up the Rhine to a base near Neuss; they
were contained and driven back by Lothar and a Saxon army (AB863). Limited raiding still continued in France, however, as at
Poitiers in 863.
fight« in England 860

subaits Co Charles at Jtaieges 862
Fleet divide«
X besieges Seine Viking,_* Oscelle vi ith 200 ships 861
reinforced by 60 ships

Marne retreat
blocked 862

fleet fights for Robert the Strong_against Salosnn and Loire Vikings 862V

Fig. 5. Weland's campaigns in north-western France, 859-863

Several of the Prankish defensive works set up in the early 860s
seem to have been almost immediately dismantled, with royalsanction, and the stone re-used in ecclesiastical buildings, perhaps
an indication of the value of cathedrals as refuges (McKitterick
1983,233). At the assembly of Pitres in 864 Charles requested thatthese fortifications be rebuilt. Local defences were proving an
inadequate containment to the Viking threat; in the same year the32/350

Saga-Book

citizens of Aquitaine took up arms against the Seine Vikings but
were unable to prevent them sacking Clermont and reaching theirships, Robert of Anjou defeated one group of Loire Vikings but
was beaten back by a second, and Pippin II of Aquitaine had
actually joined the Danes and renounced Christianity (AB 864).
The dynasty of Haraldr was still causing trouble in the north, as
his son Rodulf was able to extort a Danegeld payment from Lothar,
who was fighting Vikings in Flanders and on the Rhine.
Through a combination of mismanagement and civil dissension
Charles was unable to employ his fortification system to goodeffect. In 865, 50 ship-loads of Seine Vikings escaped a blockade
at Pitres, bypassing fortified bridges at Auvers and Charenton aftera raid on the Parisian vineyards, while the Loire Vikings were able
to raid upriver as far as Fleury and burn Orleans before returning
to their base. A second Loire force was defeated at Poitiers by
Count Robert (AB 865 mentions five hundred casualties and agreat haul of 'banners and weapons') and in Aquitaine the local
militia fought with a Scandinavian host from the Charente under
the command of Sigefrid. Later in the year Salomon again alliedwith Vikings for a joint raid on Le Mans.
866 saw a dramatic victory for the Seine Vikings: after defeating
Robert and Odo at Melun a large host forced Charles the Bald to
pay not only a tribute of 4000 pounds of silver and wergild for deadVikings, but also to agree to release all Scandinavian prisoners. An
abortive attempt to block the Seine at Pitres failed in June and by
July the Seine host had reached the open sea (AB 866). The Franks
did have some success, however, confining the Loire Vikings totheir base after repulsing them from Neustria. Their permanentcamp in the Loire estuary made the surrounding area so hazardousthat Bishop Actard of Nantes was forced to request translation toa safer see (CR 264), which was granted to him by the Pope twoyears later.
The period 866-873 was one of escalating Viking activity in
Brittany, as often in alliance with the Bretons as in opposition tothem, while Salomon's political manoeuvres grew more intricate
and sophisticated. The year after the Le Mans raid of 865, Salomon
made contact with Hasten (Hasteinn), one of the main commanders of the Great Army, and a joint Breton-Danish force
attacked Poitou, Anjou, Maine and Touraine. Le Mans was sacked
again and a Prankish army was defeated at Brissarthe, a battle inwhich Counts Robert and Ranulf were killed (AB 866; Regino
records the battle under his 867 annal, describing a night attack

The Vikings in Brittany

33/351

Salomon 862
trtirinTritt.nv, 844. ^^J. ^"^Brittany occupied P*
after 3 victor!.. 847 / ,ith Braton.)arriv. I
Noirmoutl.r 8tS-8W.

( •arch to Poiticn 865v*
fight Roburtof Anjou 864* Pottiar. 855,8
863\J» Aquitaina 843.847.8S6>• Garonn. 844

raid in Galici. 8W>

Fig. 6. The Loire Vikings, 843-866

on a fortified church). As a result, Salomon was granted theabbeys, villae and fiscs in Coutances and thereafter styled himself
rex (though it would be inappropriate to lay too much stress on
this title; Wendy Davies, pers. comm.). It is important to note that
Salomon was an ally, not a vassal, of Charles and ruled a very much
independent Brittany (see Davies 1981). The first contemporaryreference to the Dol archbishopric occurs at this time, and it ispossible that ecclesiastical estrangement from the Empire wasmore pronounced under Salomon than Nominee. Through hiscomplex web of mutually exclusive alliances, Salomon nevertheless sought to make himself and Brittany vital to the protection ofnorth-west Francia, where he may have held equal power toCharles (Davies 1981, 91).
By 868 Salomon had agreed to lead a campaign against the Loire34/352

Saga-Book

Vikings with Carolingian aid, perhaps in return for a grant of land
(Davies 1988, 20), but instead found himself defending southeastern Brittany after the promised Prankish army ignored the
Scandinavians and ravaged Neustria itself. It was left to the levies
at Poitiers to drive off the Vikings (AB 868). In April 869 Salomon
confirmed the monks of Redon in the sanctuary at Plelan, to which
they had fled earlier, and the relics of Saint-Maxent were brought
there (CR 189-92; Privat 1971, 84-5; Davies 1988, 23). By May,
Hasteinn had assumed command of a group of Loire Vikings andattacked the Vilaine region. They were met in battle by 'Salomon
and all the Bretons' (CR 242) and the princeps Guorhwant, who
had halted in Avessac before proceeding towards Nantes (Davies
1988,171); a peace treaty was concluded by exchanges of hostages,
livestock and food, with the Bretons also gaining part of the Anjou
wine harvest as part of the agreement since their access to it had
been blocked by the Vikings (AB 869; Regino 869). Despite thetreaty, Abbot Hugh and Gauzfrid attacked the Vikings later in theyear and killed a monk who had become apostate (AB 869);
Charles the Bald ordered the fortification of Le Mans and Tours.
The early 870s saw further Viking activity in Brittany, sufficient tocause the Breton nobles to prevent Salomon's intended pilgrimage
to Rome so that he could lead the Breton defence (CR 247), but
no details are recorded of the raids (though Bill mentions a raid
on Alet before 872: II, 15-16). In 873 Hasteinn's army was besieged
at Angers by the Franks who had trapped the Scandinavians by
diverting the course of the river there (de la Borderie 1898, 94).
In 874 Brittany's internal politics were thrown into turmoil when
Salomon was murdered by a rival. The resulting surge of Viking
attacks made possible by the power vacuum was narrowly held atbay by a hasty Breton-Prankish alliance between Alain of Vannes
and Berengar of Rennes (de la Borderie 1898, 334; see also
Musset 1965). The civil warfare intensified the following year when
Pascwethen, Salomon's son-in-law, made an alliance with the
Loire Vikings, probably under Hasteinn, and attacked Erispoe's
son-in-law Guorhwant at Rennes, having sacked the monastery ofSaint-Melaine en route. From this power struggle Pascwethen'sbrother Alain and Guorhwant's son Judicael emerged as joint
rulers of Brittany, cooperating well until 877, when the Vikings
began to exploit their growing dissension.
In the late 870s the Scandinavian raids intensified as the deathsof both Charles the Bald and Louis the Stammerer gave the Vikings
virtual immunity from retaliation (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984,

The Vikings in Brittany

35/353361). Widespread devastation in Neustria forced the monks of
Evreux, Lisieux, Bayeux and Avranches to flee. The inability ofCharles the Bald to fight the Vikings successfully had led to thepromotion of those who could, such as Baldwin II of Flanders.
However, this caused a preoccupation with more localised andopportunistic resistance since many of these men frequently madealliances with Vikings for their own ends, despite being charged
with the defence of the Empire (cf. Flodoard HRE III, 23). From
880 to 882 the imperial frontiers were overrun by Vikings, withraiding all along the Rhine, in Frisia and in the area north-east of
the Seine; no attacks are recorded in Britanny during this period.
The main Viking commanders are recorded as Godafrid, Sigifrid,
Vurm and Hals, and are sometimes said to have fought in mounted
units. The dislocating effect on the Franks was considerable, withnumerous key noblemen and clerics slain and many towns andmonasteries destroyed; to this was added a financial drain asenough Danegeld was paid to fill 200 ships. (The details of theseraids are not relevant to the Breton issue; they are discussed inPrice 1988, 31-6 and visually summarised in Hill 1981, 42. The
main primary sources are the Annales Fuldenses, 880-82, which
are severely critical of the Prankish response to the Vikings.)
Haiteinn joins Gnat Any In England 893

Hasteinn leaves Loin 882- attack* north Brittany?

Histainn ,ajli«« with Bntoni 866
Vilain* 869.
Haitainn joini Loin
Vikingi 869

baiiaged at-Angers'-- 873'

Fig. 7. The Loire Vikings 866-882, and the campaigns of HSsteinn

During 883 and 884 the Carolingians began to recover, rebuilding
and fortifying the Rhineland settlements and driving the Vikings

36/354

Saga-Bookback to the frontiers. Count Heimrich freed the Rhine and theFrisians won a great victory at Norden; peace was strengthened by
the marriage of Godafrid to Lothar's step-daughter (AF 8834). Brittany had suffered least from the five-year assault: in 882
Hasteinn had left the Loire Vikings under the terms of his agreement with Louis III and may have begun raiding northern Brittany(de la Borderie 1898, 326-8; Smith 1985), and in 884 Uurmonoc(XXI) records a raid on the He Lavret monastery.
The Prankish recovery continued through 885, as Paris withstoodthe siege of Sigifrid's Danes. Heimrich killed Godafrid who had
broken his oath and attacked the Rhineland, and a Viking army
in Frisia was wiped out (AF 885). Despite these victories the tide
began to turn against the Franks with startling speed. Scandinavians
had now been in Francia continuously for over six years, and in
one of the worst years of raiding in the ninth century the wholeeastern Empire was inundated by Vikings. In 886 the Franks were
defeated near Paris and Abbots Hugh and Gozelin were killed. In
July of the same year, Heimrich, the defender of the eastern
frontiers, was slain in battle by Sigifrid; the emperor decided to
pay a tribute and retreat.
Brittany found itself the target of renewed raiding in 886, andin the latter part of the year the county of Nantes was overrun andthe city captured. Alain of Broweroch was able to maintain only
a guerrilla force to fight them (de la Borderie 1898, 329). By 888
the power-struggle between Alain of Vannes and Judicael had
intensified to such a degree that no resistance was offered to the
Scandinavians, and the Loire Vikings were able to occupy western
Brittany completely (Regino 890). The death of Judicael in battlewith the invaders left Alain in command of the Breton forces, andhe led a united army to a great victory at Questembert, driving theVikings back to the mouth of the Loire (see de la Borderie 1898,
494-5 for a discussion of the battle).
In 889 the Vikings in Frisia and their Slav allies concluded apeace treaty with the Empire (AF 889), leaving the Carolingians
able to push the Seine fleet eastwards. Some Prankish settlements
seem to have drawn up their own truce agreements with Vikingsin their area, such as that made by the citizens of Meaux (McKitterick 1983,232). Over 889-90 the Seine Vikings moved into Brittany,
hard on the heels of the Loire fleet that Alain had successfully
driven out (this latter force had broken up into several small
flotillas and sailed west). Alain again joined forces with B6rengar
of Rennes and led two Breton armies into the field. Finding their

The Vikings in Brittany

37/355retreat down the Marne blocked, the Vikings hauled their ships
overland to the Vire and besieged Saint-L6, where the Bretonsvirtually annihilated the fleet (Anglo-Saxon Chronicle 890; Smith
1985). A second force was also defeated on the river Couesnon.
Alain won two more victories against the Seine Vikings the following year (Regino 891), which consolidated his hard-won peace.
As Alain finally cleared Brittany of Vikings, the Scandinavian
stranglehold on the Empire was also coming to an end. King
Arnulf destroyed the great army encamped at Louvain, killing
Sigifrid and capturing sixteen Viking standards (AF 891), andattacks also lessened in Flanders after the strengthening of citywalls. By the end of 892 the Great Army had left mainland Europe
and sailed for England (Anglo-Saxon Chronicle 893), shifting the
focus of Viking activity in the West firmly on to the kingdom of
Wessex.

d*fut*4 on rlw Couuiun 890-841

Fig. 8. Seine Viking campaigns in Brittany, 889-891

The peace of Alain the Great: 892-907
Alain's success in battle heralded a few years of peace for
Brittany, and there are few raids recorded before his death in 907(though the Loire Vikings sacked Tours in 903; see also AV 898
and Smith 1985). Instead, he made an attempt to rebuild the
Breton church after its decline as a result of the Viking disruptions.

38/356

Saga-Book

For several years after 899 there is no recorded activity by the Seine
and Somme Vikings. It has been suggested that they congregated in
the lower Seine area and began to settle (McKitterick 1983, 236),
though this has not been proved.
Although severe, the Viking threat had been withstood up
until 907 through a combination of military endeavour, judicious
alliances and payment of tribute. Just as the Prankish response
was marked by local defence rather than organised national resistance, in the ninth century the Viking attacks tended towards
piecemeal raids rather than concentrated invasions (the apparent
emphasis on the Scheldt basin may be due to an annalistic preoccupation). Before the early tenth century the Scandinavians showedno clear inclination to settle, but instead specialised in carefullyplanned attacks in ecclesiastical and market centres. Although theeconomic losses seem immense (and Danegeld payments certainly
led to increased financial demands on the populace) it is possiblethat Charles the Bald had inherited an empire with already declining trade networks (Hodges 1981a, 228; though see WallaceHadrill 1975b, 228 for an alternative view).
There are no references to widespread agrarian devastation in
Brittany (see Wallace-Hadrill 1975b, 229-32), but it has beenargued that the Vikings may have deliberately avoided this andallowed agricultural production to be maintained, to provide themselves with a food supply to be exacted as part of tribute payments(Davies 1988, 55; AB 869). Viking supply routes and logistics are
discussed in Chapter 4 below. In Brittany the raids seem to havebeen largely a problem for the aristocracy, with the peasants
fighting only in personal defence, though it must be stressed thatthe details of Breton military organisation at a local level are
obscure (Davies 1988, 23, 170). Certainly the capacity for armed
resistance in Brittany may have been affected by dislocations in
the chain of command from the ruler to the machtiems, the local
hereditary officers upon whom the civil administration depended(see Davies 1981, especially 99; de la Borderie 1898, 124-64).
The dismemberment of Carolingian power, notably the divisionof the Empire in 888, was partly a result of the Vikings' drain on
Prankish resources. This loss of coordinated regional control,
together with the many gaps in the local power structures causedby the deaths of officials during raids, was a contributory factor to
the establishment of small states such as Flanders and Normandy(Bates 1982, 5; see also Yver 1969, 302-6).

The Vikings in Brittany

39/357The conquest and occupation of Brittany: 907-939
Following the death of Alain the Great in 907, Brittany was left
without a strong leader (it has been suggested that Breton resistance up to that time was chiefly dependent on the personal leadership in battle of Salomon and Alain, see Smith 1985). Although
the sources are unclear, Viking attacks seem to have escalated
dramatically during the reign of Gurmhailon, the count of Cornouaille, who succeeded Alain.
Far more significant for Brittany's future was a battle fought at
Chartres in 911 between Charles III (the Simple) and the commander of the Seine Vikings, Rollo (usually identified with GgnguHrdlfr); as a result of this battle Hr61fr was granted the pagi of
Talon, Caux, Roumois and parts of the Vexin and Evrecin in theTreaty of Saint-Clair-sur-Epte'. This agreement has been muchdiscussed, and the statement by Dudo of Saint-Quentin that thecession included Brittany as well should be dismissed. The entire
treaty may be an invention of Dudo, but a charter of 918 confirminga grant of land to the monastery of Saint-Germain-des-Pres saysthat land has been granted Nottmannis Sequanensibus videlicet
Rolloni suisque comitibus 'to the Northmen of the Seine, namely
Rollo [Hr61fr] and his followers', pro tutela regni 'for the defenceof the kingdom' (McKitterick 1983, 237; Lauer 1940-49, no. 92).
Hr61fr seems to have been made a count with responsibilities for
defence and judicial administration, on similar terms to Salomon's
receipt of the Cotentin but with the inclusion of bishoprics. Although Hrdlfr was probably a Norwegian, the son of Earl
Rggnvaldr Moerajarl, his army is likely to have been a conglomerateof Scandinavians including many Danes who had been with theGreat Army in England. The valleys of the Orne, Dives and Risle
were settled sporadically by different groups of Vikings over thefollowing years. They seem to have ruled the Prankish population,
which may not have been large, and to have rapidly absorbed
Prankish customs and culture at a rate accelerated by intermarriage
and conversion (see Musset 1975b, 42). The various Viking groups
were by no means mutually friendly (see Douglas 1947, 107-8),
and the constant civil strife recorded led to instability in the earlyyear of Normandy's creation. Though there is no evidence ofwidespread repopulation, place-name research suggests settlers
from Scandinavia, England, Ireland and possibly Orkney (seeFellows-Jensen 1988; Davis 1976,21-5; Bates 1982,16-19; Adigard
des Gautries' definitive studies 1951-9 and Guinet 1980; the Celtic
names may point more closely to the Hebrides — Gillian FellowsJensen, pers. comm.). There may have been a particularly strong40/358

Saga-Book

element of militant paganism in western Neustria, where placenames show that Scandinavian settlement was densest (see Bates
1982, 13-14). 4
With the settlement of Hrolfr's Seine army, the character of
Scandinavian involvement in France changes. 'Vikings' no longer,
the invaders pursue definite land-taking objectives, linked to thefortunes of their fellow Scandinavians in England and Ireland.
The attacks of the early tenth century in Brittany, however, represent the last phase of the 'First Viking Age', the period of raiding
and devastation, and it has been suggested that the heaviest attacks
on Brittany occur when Viking activity elsewhere eases off (Smith
1985), a theory discussed below. It is certainly clear that the 911
settlements around the Seine reduced raiding in that area and that
only Brittany and Ireland were then subject to serious assault,
something doubtless welcomed by the Franks.
For Brittany, the most dramatic consequence of Hr61fr's agreement with the Franks was that the most aggressive and ambitiousof the Seine Vikings split off from the main group and sailed roundthe coast to the Loire. From this time onwards, Brittany was thefocus of Viking raiding activity in France.
In 912 the raids continued with unparalleled ferocity. The monastery of Saint-Guenol6 at Landevennec was destroyed by Vikingsfrom the Loire in 913, and the monks fled to Chateau-du-Loir withthe saint's relics (in 926 they moved again to Montreuil-sur-Mer).
The impact of this phase of attacks can be seen particularly clearlyin such evacuations, recorded at many monasteries, though it is
not always apparent whether it is the whole community that leaves
or just an escort for the monastic treasure and relics. Lehon wasused as an assembly point for clerical fugitives as the attacks
worsened, organised by Salvator of Alet who had fled there earlier
with the relics of Saint Machutus (de la Borderie 1898, 364-5).
The effect on the church was already considerable by the earlytenth century. After leaving Noirmoutier in 836, the community
there travelled through Saint-Philibert-de-Grand-Lieu, on to Cunauld in Anjou, Messay in Poitou, finally reaching Tournus in
Bourgogne by May 875 (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 379-89).
The monks of Saint-Martin-de-Vertou had left in 843 to go toSaint-Jouin-de-Marnes in Poitou (de la Borderie 1898,310-14) andthe clergy of Saint-Florent-le-Vieil at Mont Glonne departed forBerry in 866 (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 379-89). The Quimper community also went to Montreuil-sur-Mer, and SaintGuenael's sent many monks first to Coucouronne and then toThe Vikings in Brittany

41/359

Corbeil (de la Borderie 1898, 336). The relics of Saint Samson
were moved from Dol to Avranches and Orleans (de la Borderie
1898,367-8), and those of Saint-Paul-de-Leon were taken to Fleury(McKitterick 1983, 245). Saint-Meen removed its relics to safetyin 919, Redon did the same in 924 and Saints Maxentius, Gildas,
Melenius and Paternus of Vannes were among many others whose
remains were evacuated between 917 and 927. Not all the major
saints were removed, however, and some, such as Marcellinus,
Hypothemius and Conwoion, remained in their churches. Hughthe Great made considerable efforts to settle the fleeing clergy,
notably those from Dol and Bayeux (see Guillotel 1982).s
Many of the Breton saints' relics, monks and cult practice foundtheir way to ^Ethelstan's England, where they became establishedbastions of the church, notably Samson's remains at Milton Abbas(William of Malmesbury 399-460); the English lists of saints'
resting-places provide many more examples (Rollason 1978; Gougaud 1919-21).

St.Pol-da-won

St.Tugdual

Bauzit*-MfawtCors«.l *ftourbriac

/

t Dol

Lihon
St.HtenLocnin*•* Busalt
Ruffiac** Vannn• Monutariai«• Bithopricmt Anhbichopric• St.Maxent

Hassirac

St.Gildai-de-Rhuis..St.Hazaire
SO km

St.Helaine
•c*
Renms

Basse-Indre ^St.Andrey.

VercouNoirmoutier^. Indre t St.Philibert

Fig. 9 The Church in Brittany from the eighth to tenth centuries

The movement of relics and monks has been seen by WallaceHadrill (1975b, 222-32) as reflecting the contemporary perception

42/360

Saga-Bookof the Vikings as a real threat to Christianity itself, perhaps still
felt as late as the eleventh century (cf. Wulfstan's Sermo Lupi ad
Anglos). He draws attention to the emphasis placed on conversion
as a condition in treaties (e.g. AB 873) and argues that perhaps
the Scandinavians sometimes demanded apostasy as a similar indication of loyalty, as with Pippin II of Aquitaine (AB 864; also
discussed by Brooks 1979, 12-16). Certainly, the desecration ofchurches was a widespread phenomenon (Wallace-Hadrill 1975b,
223-5) and possibly even blood sacrifices, as at the siege of Paris.
But in Brittany itself there is no evidence either in the archaeology
or place-names to suggest specific pagan cult activity (Olaf Olsen,
pers. comm.).
In 914 Brittany suffered its worst raiding to date. The AngloSaxon Chronicle records that a large fleet of Danes led by Ohter(6ttarr) and Hroald/Hraold (Haraldr?) sailed south from the
Severn estuary to attack Brittany. It is possible that these Vikings
were kept informed about the political situation both in Brittany
and Frankia through connections with their countrymen in Normandy, and were thus able rapidly to take advantage of thedisorganised and divided Bretons (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984,337). The Danes campaigned in Brittany for nearly four years
before moving north again to ravage England and Wales: during
this time the Breton church, aristocracy and general popular morale were further eroded.
The end came in 919. A massive fleet of Loire Vikings sailed for
Brittany under the command of a Norwegian, Rpgnvaldr, andlanded at Nantes. It is possible that the incentive for the invasion
came from reports of Ottarr's and Haraldr's success reaching the
Scandinavian homelands, though there is no proof of this (de laBorderie 1898,355). The picture we get is one of total devastation:
Nortmanni omnem Brittaniam in Cornu-Galliae, in ora scilicet maritima, sitam
depopulantur, proterunt atque delent, abductis, venditis, ceterisque cunctis
eiectis Brittonibus.
Flodoard Ann. 919

Although the initial target seems to have been Nantes, a wealthy
city excellently placed for controlling the mouth of the Loire andaccess to further targets upstream, there is no evidence that theeffects of the invasion were confined to the south-east. The impact
is particularly evident in the flight of refugees. Mathedoi of Poherand his son Alain Barbetorte (grandson of Alain the Great) together with many other counts, clerics and machtiems fled to England. Others went into Bourgogne and Aquitaine (CN 81-3);

The Vikings in Brittany

43/361join Great Any in England 892-896

Ottarr and Haraldr
raid Brittany 9U.-917

eastern Brittany occupied 888'judicael killed .x.

defeated at quuttabart 888, T _ratnat to Hantei i
MantelFig. 10 The Loire Vikings, 886-917

Breton resistance appears to have been small, followed quickly byabandonment. This is not to imply a completely empty land (asCh^deville and Guillotel state, 1984, 397), since several monasteries obviously remained occupied at least until the 920s; Abbot
Radbod of Dol was certainly present there in 926 when he sent a
letter to ^Ethelstan requesting aid against the Scandinavians. The
surviving Bretons may have been led by Judicael B6rengar, who
seems to have stayed in Brittany throughout the invasion (Hughof Fleury 4). It is nevertheless apparent that the scale of theinvasion was unparalleled; the thoroughness of Rggnvaldr's army
in eliminating all opposition certainly implies that they intended
to stay for a long time. The mention of slave-raiding by Flodoard
is probably a mistake, as there is no evidence of an increase inslavery in Scandinavia or elsewhere at this time (though see Wallace-Hadrill 1975b, 232), and any such prisoners would most likely
have stayed in Brittany. It should be emphasised that only the
Loire Vikings occupied Brittany in 919, not a combined force
involving the Scandinavians from the Seine too as stated by Dudoof Saint-Quentin (see chapter 1 and de la Borderie 1898,373,776).
By 920, Rognvaldr had gained complete political control ofBrittany, which was confirmed in 921 when Nantes was ceded tohim by Robert of Neustria after an unsuccessful five-month siege
during which the Vikings dug fortifications around the estuary toprotect their fleet; as part of the agreement the Vikings nominally44/362

Saga-Book'received the faith of Christ' (Flodoard Ann. 921). From this point
onwards there is an almost total absence of documentary references
to Brittany until the return of Alain Barbetorte in 937; sourcesfrom other areas may illuminate the picture slightly, however. In
923 and 924 Hrdlfr's Scandinavians raided widely along the Seinein alliance with RQgnvaldr's Nantes army, destroying Beauvais in
923 (Flodoard Ann. 923-4). It is possible that Rggnvaldr aided
Charles the Simple in his struggles with Herbert of Vermandois,
and Flodoard believed that RQgnvaldr was seeking land for settlement (Ann. 925); this will most likely remain obscure since theprecise details of the 921 agreement are unknown. In 923 Rpgnvaldr
devastated Aquitaine and the Auvergne, and then sailed up the
Oise to the He de France, only returning after land concessions on
the Seine (Flodoard Ann. 923). The following year the Breton
Vikings and some of Hr61fr's forces again raided in France, striking
down into Bourgogne; despite this, Hr61fr was granted Le Mans,
Bayeux, 1'Huernin and the Bessin, thus consolidating his hold on
Neustria. From late 924 to early 925 Rpgnvaldr was driven back to
Nantes after a major battle against the combined armies of Raoul
I, Hugh the Great and Herbert of Vermandois, though many of
the Neustrian aristocracy were killed. Having broken free of theirsiege, Rggnvaldr was forced to fight a retreat through heavily
forested country in order to reach Brittany, though he accepted apayment of silver to do so (Flodoard Ann. 925). This is the last
reliable record that survives of this Viking leader; his impact on
popular consciousness may be seen in the fictionalised account of
his death in the second book of the Miracles of Saint-Benoit (seeChedeville and Guillotel 1984, 379) written in the early eleventh
century by Aimoin, which tells of gaudy pyrotechnics, moving
stones and apparitions accompanying the passing of one of the last
Viking sea-kings.
In 927 the Loire Vikings were attacked again in a five-week siege
by Hugh the Great and Herbert of Vermandois. A truce was drawn
up, and in return for peace elsewhere in France the Scandinavians
were ceded Nantes again, though Brittany itself is not mentioned(unlike in the 921 treaty), probably because it was not undernominal Prankish control in the first place (Flodoard Ann. 927).
A new agreement may have been thought necessary following
Rpgnvaldr's attacks after 921. Despite the terms of the 927 cession,
the Loire Vikings raided Limousin in 930 but were driven out by
twelve cavalry squadrons led by Raoul I (Flodoard Ann. 930).
Throughout the Carolingian period Brittany had been vulner-

The Vikings in Brittany

45/363Fig. 11 The career of Rpgnvaldr and the occupation of Brittany, 919-925

able to attack from the neighbouring regions of France, especiallyat times of civil strife, and the Loire Vikings now seem to haveexperienced similar difficulties. In 931, Scandinavians from allover Brittany assembled in a great army on the Loire, poised for
an attack on the Franks. The Bretons siezed their chance andrebelled, an indication that at least some of their leaders had
stayed behind in 919. The Vikings appear to have been takencompletely by surprise and many were killed in a series of small
battles throughout the region, including one Felekan, 'their duke'(Flodoard Ann. 931; Cartulary of Quimperle 931). A counterattack was rapidly mounted by the Loire army mentioned above,
under their chieftain Incon, and Brittany was reconquered (Flodoard Ann. 931).
The 931 rebellion gives us an important insight into the natureof the Viking occupation, through studies of the names of thetwo commanders mentioned by Flodoard. Unlike Rognvaldr, acommon Norwegian name, Felekan and Incon are not Scandinavian names. Initial research suggested an Irish origin for Felekan.
The Corpus Genealogiarum Hibemiae (O'Brien 1976) yielded
several possible parallels and Mussel (1978, 108) claimed that thename was well attested in twelfth-century Irish sources. 6 Given
the context, however, the name is more likely to come fromthe Breton/Cornish Felec, with an added -an diminutive ending46/364

Saga-Book(Gillian Fellows-Jensen, pers. comm.; cf. Olson and Padel 1986,
48). The only parallel for Incon is a name from the Chrestomathie
Bretonne (Loth 1890), Inconmarc. Since the only close parallels
for these chieftains' names are Breton, this raises the interesting
possibility that the Loire Vikings may have been commanded
by Bretons after the death of Rognvaldr (presumably sometime
between 926 and 930/31). Close integration with the indigenous
population is a marked feature of other Scandinavian colonies,
and it is possible that some parties in the Breton civil power
struggles actively joined the Vikings to further their own causes
or to prevent widespread disruption within Brittany. This would
certainly explain the 931 rebellion as the action of disaffected
Breton political factions. It must however be emphasised that thisdeduction is by no means conclusive and the names as preservedby Flodoard are probably corrupt. It is unlikely that Felekan was
Rxjgnvaldr's sole successor since he would surely have been with
the Loire host; perhaps he and Incon were joint-rulers or leadersof separate groups of Vikings. Whatever the truth of the matter.
Incon became the ruler of Brittany after the 931 rebellion.
The role of the Normans in quelling the revolt should be considered. Hr61fr's son William Longsword had assumed power c.
925 (Hr61fr actually died in 932), and had nominally submitted toRalph in 928. Flodoard records that in 933 William was given by
the Franks 'the territory of the Bretons at the edge of the sea'
(Ann. 933), which has been interpreted as meaning the FrankoBreton March, thus implying a deliberate attempt on the part of
the Franks to foster conflict between the Loire Vikings and theNormans of the Seine. This is further confused by Dudo of SaintQuentin's assertion that William put down the Breton revolt himself, a fiction designed to support retrospectively the Normans'
claim to Britanny (see de la Borderie 1898,379-80; Fellows-Jensen
1988, 115-16). A detailed examination of Flodoard's terminology,
however, shows that only the Cotentin and Avranchin were ceded
to William, territory earlier acquired by Salomon in 867, and that
Incon still held the whole of the Breton peninsula. In 935 WilliamLongsword made an alliance with Hugh the Great, thus effectively
ruling out any further assistance for the Loire Vikings in the caseof war (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 400). By early 936, theVikings in Brittany were completely isolated and without allies.
During the years of Scandinavian occupation in Brittany, Alain
Barbetorte had grown up at /Ethelstan's court in England, raised
as the king's foster-son (Breton links with England dated from at

The Vikings in Brittany

47/365

least Alfred's time; see Asser 76, 102). Abbot John ofLandevennec, who seems to have remained in Brittany, had maintained contacts with the exiled Bretons and in 936 asked Alain to
return, perhaps sensing the Vikings' vulnerability. With the helpof a fleet and some troops given by the English king, Alain
landed at Dol with an army of Bretons (Flodoard Ann. 936). Brief
references to the situation in Brittany as Alain found it on his
return help towards the reconstruction of a picture of the area
under Scandinavian rule. As in 931, the Vikings were unprepared
and Alain quickly defeated a contingent of them who were revelling in the monastery at Dol. He then met a second small force atSaint-Brieuc and was obliged to retreat, sailing along the coast toPlourivo where he fought another Viking host and erected a victory
cross, an action which perhaps indicates that the Scandinavians
were pagans (Flodoard Ann. 936; de la Borderie 1898, 388-90).
Given that within a few days Alain had encountered three separate
groups of Scandinavians in the north of Brittany, none of whom
had apparently gone there to oppose him, we can hardly conclude
that Viking settlement was restricted to the Nantes area. Instead
it seems that they had dispersed throughout Brittany, occupying
settlements and looting at will, and only banding together whenconcerted action was required, as with the assembly of the Loire
army in 931. The following year Alain renewed his march, hisarmy probably growing as he passed through the country. Flodoard
records that he fought many battles, gradually driving the Scandinavians back until the whole occupying force was concentrated in
Nantes. No Viking leaders are referred to at this time; perhaps
Incon had died and the Scandinavians were divided by internalfeuds (common enough in Viking colonies), though this is pure
conjecture.
The Scandinavians built a great camp at Saint-Aignan in theangle of the Loire and the Erdre, just outside Nantes. Alain had
been declared duke by the surviving Bretons on his return, andnow led them in a charge against the ramparts, only to be beaten
back. After forcing a Viking sortie to retreat in disorder the Bretons
rested and attacked again. In a battle lasting the whole day instifling weather, Alain's army eventually stormed the fortress; theViking force was badly mauled and the survivors retreated down
the Loire in their remaining ships, leaving Alain in possession of
the field (the siege is described, perhaps somewhat fancifully, in
the Chronicle of Nantes, 90-92).
We are given a vivid picture of Nantes as it was when Alain48/366

Saga-Book

entered it: his army walked through weed-covered streets pastruined buildings, and Duke Alain was forced to cut his way throughthick brambles to reach the basilica of Saint Felix, empty anddisused for nineteen years (CN 92; although the Chronicle ofNantes is a later, untrustworthy source, it is quite likely to derivefrom an earlier chronicle, now lost). Nantes was established as
Alain's capital and he immediately set about ordering its defences
and built a great rampart around the cathedral.
By 939 many of the exiles had returned to Brittany and Duke
Alain II had established his rule over the area. The previous year
the scattered remnants of the Nantes Vikings had re-formed andmoved north-east into the county of Rennes, where they had built
a large fortification at Trans. In 939 they resumed raiding in thevicinity of Rennes, opposed by Judicael Berengar. In August he
was reinforced by an army under the joint leadership of Alain andHugh the Great; after a brief siege, a combined assault on theViking camp finally removed the last of the Scandinavians who
had occupied Brittany for so long (Flodoard Ann. 939).
Alain wins victory' at Plourivo 936
Alain land< at Dol«nd defeats Viking
forct 936 'Alain retreats from\ battle near St.Brieuc 936 V>---*-- --4--..-'
Vikings re-fora and raid
Rennes area. Defeated andAlain fights "uny battles" 936-937
dispersed by Alain at/\
Irani 939.
fdriven back from
Lisnusin 930
Any assembles on the Loire 931.
Bretons rebel and Felekan killed.
Revolt crushed by Incon
Vikings expelled from
Rentes 937\\

second cession o? Nantes 927
after battle with Hugh the Greatand Herbert of Vemandois

Fig. 12. The return of Alain Barbetorte and the dispersal of the Loire Vikings,
930-939

Interesting light is thrown on the last years of the Viking colony

The Vikings in Brittany

49/367by a Welsh poem, the Armes Prydein or 'Prophecy of Britain',which describes an alliance of the Celtic kingdoms, the HibernoNorse and the Vikings of the Northern Isles against ^Ethelstan.
Amidst bitter complaints about Anglo-Saxon rule there is a cryptic
reference to Brittany:
From Llydaw [Brittany] will come a splendid army,
Warriors on war-steeds who spare not their foe.
Armes Prydein 153-4 (tr. Clancy 1970, 111)

The poem is of problematic date (see chapter 1), but if it doesrefer to the 'Great Battle' of Brunanburh in 937 rather than to thecampaigns against Eirikr b!650x in the 950s then the Breton
reference is particularly important. Even if the poem is an 'appeal
to history', a reference to a myth of Celtic unity from which Brittany
could not be excluded (Roberts 1976, 36), the unlikelihood of
Bretons joining such a coalition does not detract from the absurdityof such a request given the close links between ^Ethelstan's court
and the descendants of Alain the Great, even assuming the presence of disaffected Breton nobles in the homeland. The reference
makes much more sense if it is interpreted as an appeal to the
Nantes Vikings, which would be ironic considering the dire straits
in which they found themselves in 937 (cf. Dumville 1983,151-2).

Fig. 13. Memorial crosses erected on the sites of two Breton victories over the
Scandinavians, at Plourivo in 936 (left) and Questembert in 888 (right).
From de la Borderie 1898

With the Scandinavian defeat at Trans in 939 the period ofmajor Viking involvement with Brittany came to an end. Before
considering later contact with raiding fleets and campaigning armies, it is appropriate to review the Scandinavian occupation, the50/368

Saga-Book

motives of the invaders and why they were ultimately beaten so
rapidly. The ninth-century raids have already been shown to havebeen typical looting expeditions of the period, Brittany perhaps
being in an unfortunate position on the route between the Continent and the Irish Sea. Apart from convenient islands for coastal
bases, Brittany had little to offer the prospective land-taker whencompared with the richer prizes of England, Ireland and theNorthern Isles. As mentioned above, however, the options andopenings for Vikings who wished to settle down had become
severely restricted by the start of the tenth century, due more topolitical considerations than to lack of space (there is no real
evidence of population pressure in Scandinavia at this time). By c.
900 the complex power struggles of York and Dublin were alreadywell advanced, extending to Man, Scotland and Orkney; Scandinavia itself was riven by political strife resulting in numerous exiled
pretenders with their retinues. Many of these must have joined theGreat Army, but the majority who wished to do so would surely
have been able to settle in the Danelaw unless prevented bypersonal or political differences.
The Vikings operating on the Seine under Hr61fr's generalcommand appear to have been just such a polyglot army as might
be expected (cf. Fellows-Jensen 1988,129-33): the severe divisions
within it have already been noted. The settlement of northern
Neustria and the rise of Normandy, although taking place towards
the end of the settlement period, still unfolded within the peripheryof the Viking world. With the baptism of Hr61fr and WilliamLongsword Normandy became at least nominally integrated into
Christian Europe (Musset 1975b, 42), and after an initially pronounced Scandinavian cultural impact the settlement began toassume a Prankish character. The perceived threat to paganism
has already been discussed; is it not possible that towards thesecond decade of the tenth century there were increasing numbersof true 'Vikings' left stranded in and around north-western France,
hard-core mercenaries who had no wish to settle down and farm
the land? The choices open to such men would have been limited
indeed, and Brittany may have seemed a natural target, in fact the
only one remaining.
It would be foolish to suggest that Rggnvaldr's Loire army was
entirely composed of such renegades, or read too much from suchmeagre evidence, but there are a number of singular features of
the Viking occupation that are inescapable. Firstly, there are noreferences anywhere to actual Scandinavian settlement, only toThe Vikings in Brittany

51/369military occupation. The only Scandinavian place-names in Brittany cluster around Mont-Saint-Michel and Dol, and probably
represent settlers coming from the Cotentin in the later tenthcentury; indeed it would be unusual to observe a significant impact
on place-names after only nineteen years of occupation. There isno mention of agriculture or stock-rearing (the nearest equivalents
are raids on the vineyards of Anjou), only random and senselessviolence very different from the precisely planned assaults of theninth century; even the later raids into the Prankish heartland
seem to serve little practical purpose. Similarly, the signs of occupation seen by Alain II and his troops as described in the Chronicleof Nantes do not present an image of ordered settlement: deserted,
overgrown streets lined with ruined, empty buildings. The very
devastation apparent in Brittany is uncharacteristic of Viking colonies; the shock in Flodoard's 919 annal is evident and surprisingconsidering the long years of raiding that France had seen.
Everything points to occupied Brittany as an anachronism, isolated politically and militarily. The fact that Alain was able tosucceed in the liberation of a vast area of land, starting from aseaborne invasion and landing launched from another country, avery rare occurrence in the early medieval period, testifies to theViking colony's weakness. Long-term settlement would in any
event have been impossible without the maintenance of Brittany's
trade networks. York had extensive mercantile contacts in thetenth century, with links to Scandinavia, western Europe andbeyond; a prosperity unmatched elsewhere in the Danelaw (seeMacGregor 1978). Dublin looked to the Irish Sea and the Celtic
kingdoms. Normandy itself had considerable trading connections,
not only with the Viking homelands (see Breese 1977, 54-7), butalso with the local markets of the Franks (Musset 1975b, 43-4).
Without comparable trade Brittany could not be maintained as a
viable state. There is no evidence that the Loire Vikings made any
attempt to introduce an administrative system of their own, or tomaintain and absorb Breton institutions (see Davies 1988, 52-60).
What is surprising in fact is that the occupation lasted for nearlytwenty years, a testament to the capabilities of Rpgnvaldr who
managed to hold his army together for so long and also perhaps
an indication of Prankish relief at being presented with a Viking
threat that was both containable and centred in the lands of theirold enemies, the Bretons.

52/370

Saga-Book

The last of the Vikings: 939-1076
Between 941 and 947, the already strained relationship between
the Bretons and Normans gave rise to some of the last Scandinavian
activity in Brittany. In 941 or 942 William Longsword allowed aDanish exile, Aigrold, to settle in the Cotentin with his followers(Aigrold has been identified with Haraldr Gormsson of Denmark(Gillian Fellows-Jensen, pers. comm.); cf. Albrechtsen 1979, 123note 27). Based at Bayeux, for a time Aigrold maintained anuneasy peace with the Bretons. In 942 however, William wasmurdered, an event that sparked off a wave of civil warfare forcontrol of Normandy. William's son Richard, in alliance with
Aigrold and Louis IV of Outremer, fought with Hugh the Greatin a series of internecine struggles involving considerable treacheryand several broken agreements. Late in the year Sigfrid Sigtryggsson arrived in the Seine with warriors from York and a Viking
called Tormod; the latter led a pagan revolt in Normandy andtogether with Sigfrid joined forces with Hugh. Both Vikings were
killed in battle at Rouen by Louis IV (Richer of Rheims IV, 57;
see also de la Borderie 1898, 413 and Bates 1982, 13-14).
In Brittany, while the warring Norman factions sought to extend
their control by force, Judicael Berengar rebelled against theauthority of Duke Alain. This left Dol unprotected and Aigrold
led a raid against the town in 944. The citizens took refuge in thecathedral and the Scandinavians were driven off by a Breton relief
force (de la Borderie 1898, 413). By 947, Richard had emerged
the victor of the Norman disputes (see Bates 1982,12-15) and ruled
an autonomous Normandy as duke. After marrying the daughterof Hugh the Great he revived his father's claims to Breton overlordship, as celebrated by Dudo of Saint-Quentin.
In 952 Alain II died, having kept Brittany free from Viking
attack since his victory in 939. He had slowly restored all the
Breton monasteries except for Indres and had consolidated his
ducal authority, exercising power far in excess of that once wieldedby Nominoe. Alain was succeeded by his son Drogo, still a child,
precipitating renewed civil conflict in Brittany. Drogo's mother,
the sister of the count of Blois and Chartres, married again, toFulk the Good of Anjou who was a rival of her brother. In thefighting that followed, Conan I of Rennes eventually became duke,
having made an alliance with the count of Blois and defeated
Judicael Berengar. In order to rid himself of influence from Blois,
Conan then signed a pact with Richard I of Normandy and thus
established firm Breton-Norman links for the first time (see de laBorderie 1898, 246-8).

The Vikings in Brittany

53/371

Sigfrid Sigtxygguon and lonod—— ' 's«im

TLouis IVy«arFig. 14. Viking raids from Normandy, 941-960

In 960 a renegade Norman, Thibaud, attacked the monasteries
around L6on with a small fleet and went on to besiege Nantes; hewas defeated after a short battle (CN 111-12). Between 961 and965 Normandy was again wracked by internal warfare following
raids made from the Seine against Chartres and the Breton March(Breese 1977,53; Douglas 1947,107-8). As the tenth century wore
on the Neustrians and Normans rapidly fused into a single people,
encouraged by growing prosperity and urban expansion. The Normans, however, did not lose their Scandinavian links. Richard II(996-1026) received from Sveinn Forkbeard of Denmark a shareof the plunder from his invasion of England (Bates 1982, 7),
and Norman mercenaries may have fought alongside Vikings at
Clontarf in 1014. That year also saw the last recorded raid on
Brittany, when Dol was burned by a Viking fleet (Ch6deville andGuillotel 1984, 400).
Breton dependency on the Normans grew (in 1030 Alain III
paid homage to Duke Robert) and by the reign of William theConqueror, Brittany was feudally dependent on Normandy after
the duke had reasserted the old claims to overlordship (see deBouard 1984, 222-7). William seems to have played the Bretons
against each other; the Bayeux Tapestry shows him besieging
Conan II at Dol with the help of Harold Godwineson (though
Conan was in fact probably besieging it himself). Although he54/372

Saga-Book

supported Riwallon of Dol against Conan, William later released
Conan after his defeat, and the latter promptly imprisoned Riwallon. Having demonstrated his power, William had gained an ally
and while a Breton contingent fought at Hastings in 1066, Conan
attacked Anjou rather than taking advantage of William's absencefrom Normandy (Wilson 1985, 178-81), though it is interesting tonote that it was the Bretons of all his army who failed him in thebattle.
After the Conquest, several notable Bretons, among them Judhael of Totnes, Alan of Richmond, Eudo of Tattershall and Alfredof Lincoln, received lands in England from which they took theirnames; a small Breton colony was established in Richmondshire(Stenton 1971, 628-30). The problems caused by the imposition of
feudalism on Breton society made them always something of ananachronism among William's subjects (they actually mounted abrief rebellion at Dol in 1076, see Stenton 1971, 608; feudal
elements in earlier Breton society are considered by de la Borderie
1898, 210-44). Within decades of the Conquest they found themselves without an independent homeland and with no direction fordevelopment or expansion; this was especially true for those in
England, 'alien among the invaders of an alien land' (Stenton
1961, 28). It is surely ironic that after more than a century of
struggle for self-assertion and freedom from Scandinavian oppression, culminating in Alain's great victory of 939, within ahundred and fifty years the Bretons were reduced to second-ratevassals of a fifth-generation Viking.
3.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE

Having reviewed the historical background we can now turn tothe archaeological material as an independent record, comparing itwith the theories put forward in the previous section. Of particularimportance is the period 919-939, the duration of the Scandinavian
occupation, and it is to this that archaeology can make the biggest
contribution. Although meagre by comparison with the archaeology of Danelaw towns such as York, the material impact of
the Scandinavians in Brittany is considerable and certainly more
pronounced than in Wales or Cornwall. This is surprising considering both the relatively short period of known occupation and also
the limited nature of Breton medieval archaeological investigation
to date (see Sanquer 1976).

The Vikings in Brittany

55/373

The Breton evidence falls into four categories, fortifications,place-names, burials and weapons, with additional study of indigenous monasteries, rural settlements and commerce. The excavated material from Normandy will be briefly reviewed and finallymention will be made of Prankish artefacts found in Scandinavia.

Fig. 15. Scandinavian sites and finds in Brittany

Fortifications
The most impressive Scandinavian remains in Brittany are fortifications. Two of these have now been confirmed as dating to theViking period, and more particularly to the early tenth-century
occupation. The first is the Camp de P6ran, near Pledran andSaint-Brieuc in northern Brittany. The site comprises an irregularly
circular earth-work with a single 3m high rampart and 4m wide
ditch, dominating the valleys of the Urne and Gonet (the appearance of a double ditch is due to the removal of earth from the main
ditch; see Nicolardot 1984, 3-4). Originally assigned to the Iron
Age, the site has been redated following excavations which havebeen carried out there since 1983 and are still continuing. Sections

56/374

Saga-Book

across the ramparts have revealed a composition of large stone
blocks resting on a clay bank, with timber bracing on a vertical andhorizontal lattice; the rampart has been preserved by vitrification asa result of a fire which has been found to have engulfed the wholesite. This vitrification effect stops a metre from the base of therampart which has been interpreted by the director as showing twophases of construction, though this has been disputed on the
grounds of the intensity of the heat required to fuse the entire
rampart (Anne Nissen-Jaubert, pers. comm.; see also Nicolardot,
Nissen-Jaubert and Wimmers 1987, 230-31). The rampart is estimated to have been originally nearly 4m high and 5m thick.
Although only a few trial trenches have been dug in the interior
to date, some remarkable finds have been made. The most significant is a coin of Saint Peter minted at York c. 905-925, found in
the burnt layers beneath the collapsed rampart in area 2 (seeexcavation plan, Fig. 16); nearby was found a small fragment ofmetal believed to be from a helmet; in area 3 the ferrule of a lancehas been uncovered. Further dating is provided by considerable
quantitities of tenth-century pottery and a series of radiocarbon
dates which cluster around 865-1045. While on current evidence it isperhaps premature to suggest that the site 'presents the typologicalcharacteristics appropriate to Viking fortified sites' (Nicolardot
1984, 10, comparing it with the Danish Trelleborg-type enclosures), the find of the York coin, although so far unique, does lend
weight to the theory that the Camp de P6ran was either constructed,
reoccupied or attacked by Vikings in the early tenth century, aperiod when it was certainly in use. This hypothesis is further
strengthened by the record of Alain Barbetorte's landing at Dolin 936 and subsequent battle with a Viking force near Saint-Brieuc(Flodoard Ann. 936; CN 89); this would certainly fit the pictureof the destruction at Peran. Future excavations at the site over the
coming years are sure to expand considerably our knowledge ofthe Viking occupation (the main published reports are Nicolardot
1984-7; Nicolardot, Nissen-Jaubert and Wimmers 1987, with additional notes in CMdeville and Tonnere 1987, 183).
The second major fortification relating to the Scandinavian occupation is at Trans, Ille et Vilaine, where two earthworks lie 500m
apart. The first, known as Vieux M'Na, is an 80m by 90m trapezoidwith double banks and multiple, very wide ditches. The enclosure
is divided in two by a bank of granite blocks of exceptional size.
Although unexcavated, the site has parallels in shape at Saint
Suliac near La Ranee and Lanlerf near Saint-Brieuc (where de laThe Vikings in Brittany

57/375

CAMP de RERAN
Piedran, Cites-du-Nord
Plan of Excavations/j^tf-.? ~>'f' V>

M/&T
£3$3£
£*l3 f«i-ii^
r§-;nv-f r

tyt3^P.A.MJ-%^

150m

Fig. 16.

Drawn by PAEmiry tfttr Nicollnlot

58/376

Saga-Book

Fig. 17. Profiles across the ramparts of the Camp de P£ran - see main plan forlocations (after Raboron in Nicolardot 1984).

Borderie 1898, 388 placed the 936 battle). Half a kilometre awayon the crest of a hill is the Camp des Haies, a circular doubleditched enclosure which was excavated in 1979. Pottery found in
the nineteenth century provides a firm date of 920-980 for theoccupation, and the excavations showed the rock-cut ditches to bevery rough and irregular; this is interpreted by the excavators as
an indication of hasty construction. A few ephemeral traces ofinterior structures were observed, and finds of iron nails and aknife were made. It has been suggested that the enclosure at Vieux
M'Na is that constructed by the Loire Vikings in 939 after theirretreat from Nantes, and that the Camp des Haies is Alain Barbetorte's siege camp built shortly before the battle of Trans thatyear. While this interpretation does fit the pattern of the battle as
described in the documentary sources, and the earthworks arecertainly in the right location, the lack of evidence from Vieux
M'Na means that any firm conclusion will have to wait until thissite is excavated. (The excavations are published as Hamel-Simon,
Langouet, Nourry-Denayer and Mouton 1979, from which theabove interpretations are taken, with additional references in Guigon 1987a, 228 and Ch6deville and Tonnere 1987, 184).
By way of brief comparison with the fortifications at Peran andTrans, mention should be made of the 150m diameter circular
earthwork at Oost-Souburg in Zeeland. Generally dated to thellluiiliniillllllM1

Fig. 18. Section H-H through the rampart and ditch at the Camp de Pe'ran, with plan of excavated area.
Position of St. Peter's coin from York indicated by arrow(P. A. Emery after Nicolardot and Tostivint in Nicolardot 1984).

East-hmrtf"

West

i

I

5

60/378

Saga-Book

Fig. 19. Coin of St. Peter minted at York c. 905-925, found at the Camp de P6ran.
Legend reads EBORACE CI (heavily worn) and a corruption of SCI PETRINO.
Diameter 2cm. (P. A. Emery after Nicolardot 1984).

Fig. 20 Lance ferrule and possible helmet fragment found at the Camp de P6ran.
(P. A. Emery after Nicolardot 1984).

The Vikings in Brittany

61/379Fig. 21. Location plan of the earthworks at Trans (after Hamel-Simon et al 1979).

late ninth/early tenth centuries, though precise dating is as yet
impossible, the site has been interpreted as one of the chain offorts built to defend Flanders against Viking attack (Sawyer 1982a,
82, 87), but might equally well be a Scandinavian base (Trimpe
Burger 1973). It is possible that any Viking fortifications in Brittany
were constructed under the influence of forts such as these or theburhs of Alfred's Wessex, which may have also provided the idea
for the Trelleborg-type enclosures of Denmark.
There are many other fortifications in Brittany dated to the
Carolingian period; indeed Breton medieval archaeology has
tended to concentrate on them (Sanquer 1976, 16-18). None,
however, shows definite Scandinavian activity and they may well be
Breton defences against Viking or Prankish attack. Documentarysources show a period of construction of fortifications aroundpersonal residences and at strategic sites like bridges by the Breton
and Prankish aristocracy from c. 864 to 879, with a second periodof fortification by royal command after 887 (Hodges 1981a, 224).
Terminology is a problem with these sources; Alain the Great's
residences at Rieux and Plesse are described as castella (Smith
1985) and the late twelfth-century Song of Aiquin uses similarterms to describe a fortification at Dorlet with a ditch, moatand high rampart occupied by Aiquin's Vikings in the reign ofCharlemagne (Guigon 1987a, 228). The civil defences constructedduring the aristocratic power struggles around Rennes and Nantes

62/380

Saga-Book

are also referred to in several documents (see Chedeville andTonnere 1987, 184).
Any attempt to take an overview of fortification types in Brittany,in order to put sites like P6ran and Trans into context, is frustrated
by problems with the dating of these features and their arrangement
in a relative chronological sequence. Mottes are found in the tenthcentury in Brittany, but exist concurrently with circular camps aslate as 1050 (cf. the excavations at Lou-du-Lac (Guigon 1987a,
228) and Lamber en Ploumoguer (Sanquer 1976, 18); see also
Chedeville and Tonnere 1987, 184). Attempts have been made by
de Boiiard and Fournier (1977) to set the fortifications in a landscape context using documentary references, and Breton fortifications are now chronologically classified by departement (seeChedeville and Tonnere 1987, 181-2). To confuse the issue, Iron
Age earthworks are known to have been re-occupied in the eleventh century and there are also problems of recognition; several
excavators have mistaken windmill mounds and even tumuli formottes (Chedeville and Tonnere 1987, 181).
Carolingian earthworks excavated in Brittany include the ramparts and chapel sequence at Lezkelen en Plabennec (Irien 1976
and 1982), the tenth-century enclosure at Goarum ar Salud (Guigon 1987b) and the circular fortifications at Botalec and Kermestre
en Baud (Ch6deville and Tonnere 1987, 183). A particularly
spectacular example is the promontory fort at Castel-Cran en
Pieiauff, 130m above the confluence of the Blavet and Cavern
rivers in C6tes-du-Nord. Though the presently visible walls dateto the eleventh century, finds show that a ninth-century enclosure
preceded them (Chedeville and Tonnere 1987, 185). The site wasdeserted in the early tenth century on coin evidence and has beententatively interpreted as a machtiem's residence (Jones 1981,156).
Breton defences seem to have relied extensively on inaccessibility
and the local topography of marshes or rocky slopes.
The major towns allowed their walls to decay in the early
ninth century, which is surprising when one considers the obvious
strategic importance of the urban settlements evident in the Franks'
Breton campaigns. Urban defence may have centred on cathedrals
and ecclesiastical sites as refuges; several are known to have had
fortifications, as at Nantes in 937 and possibly Saint-Paul-de-Leon(Smith 1985). Alain Barbetorte's wall at Nantes was excavated in1913 and was found to have been largely built of re-used materials,
including Roman tiles and Merovingian sarcophagi, its hasty construction an indication of the perceived threat from the Vikings

The Vikings in Brittany

63/381even after their 937 defeat (Guigon 1984, 36 and 1987a, 228; asimilar contemporary wall, known as the Norman Gate, still stands
in Perigeux). It is possible that the walls of Rennes and Vannes
were re-fortified in the tenth century after the return of Alain II(Jones 1981, 153; see also Musset 1974 for urban growth in thisperiod), but this rests on very tenuous source evidence (Wendy
Davies, pers. comm.). The appearance of later fortifications may
be recovered in part for Dinan, Dol and Rennes from the Bayeux
Tapestry (Wilson 1985, though note his reservations 178-81).

Fig. 22. The topography of early medieval Nantes (after Barral i Altet 1984).

Place-names
Place-name studies neatly illustrate the problems associatedwith fortifications in Brittany: the motte, roche and plessis names
cluster thickly on the borders of Neustria, Maine and Anjou, andare very numerous: 115 in Loire Atlantique, 251 in Ille et Vilaine,
44 in C6tes-du-Nord, 37 in Morbihan and 17 in Finistere (Jones
1981,157). Even the names do not always reflect the true situation,
as graphically demonstrated by the known presence of 166 mottes64/382

Saga-Bookof all periods in Finistere alone, the majority of which are thought
to have ninth- and tenth-century origins (Jones 1981, 156). Difficulties associated with Breton place-name studies are highlighted
by Musset (1975a, 190-200), part of the problem being the lowlevel of French place-name research compared to the intensity ofinvestigation of, for example, Danelaw names (Fellows-Jensen
1988, 113).
The only place-names in Brittany which may have a Scandinavian
origin are those containing the element la Guerche, from Old
Norse virki or Prankish werki, meaning a fortification. Askeberg(1944,181-5) found three examples in Brittany, near Vitr6, Vannes
and Saint-Brieuc (the latter offering another candidate for thelocation of Alain Barbetorte's 936 battle), in addition to twentynine others elsewhere in France. However, Quentel (1962) has
located many more la Guerche names, not only in Brittany butwith a widespread distribution all over France, thus strengthening
the suggestion that the names may in fact be of Prankish origin. A
valuable exercise regrettably beyond the scope of this paper would
be to compare the Scandinavian personal-name elements cited by
Adigard des Gautries (1954a) with the Breton names listed by Loth
(1890), in the hope of revealing Scandinavian influence on the
population itself (I am grateful to John Dodgson for this suggestion). The Breton place-names themselves are discussed in deCourson's introduction to the Cartulaire de Redon (1863, xc-xciv).

Burials

In contrast to the other categories of archaeological material,
the evidence for Scandinavian burials in Brittany is not only unequivocal but also without parallel in the whole of France. In
1906, two amateur archaeologists, du Chatellier and le Pontois,
excavated a partially eroded mound on a cliff edge near Locmariaon the He de Groix, 6km from the southern Breton coast. The
mound overlooked a small, sandy bay, the only suitable landing
spot in that part of the island, and was easily visible from a great
distance. Upon excavation, the mound was found to cover an
extensive cremation deposit, recognised as the burnt remains of alongship. From the excavators' reports and Muller-Wille's 1978
publication of the finds it is possible to build up a sequence of
events on the site.
First, the ship was dragged up to the headland: a vessel between

The Vikings in Brittany

65/383llm and 13m long, possibly with a smaller ship's boat as in
the Gokstad burial (800 rivets survive but more than 1000 are
mentioned; Miiller-Wille 1978, 68 argues for a second boat on thisbasis). An area 17m in diameter was marked out by four verticalstone slabs and further slabs were arranged in a line leading off tothe south-west (see plan, Fig. 24). These may have marked out thepath by which the ship was brought up, or the route of a funeralprocession. The mound seems to have been prepared before theship was burnt judging by the condition of the turfs of which it wascomposed (du Chatellier and le Pontois 1908-9, 129)._____

Fig. 23. The He de Groix, showing contours and location of the barrow (after
Miiller-Wille 1978).

The ship contained the remains of two people, one matureand one adolescent (possibly a weapon-bearer or slave, as at
Balladoole and Ballateare on the Isle of Man, see Bersu andWilson 1966), along with dogs and birds. Among the objects foundin the 15cm thick burnt deposit, more than 6m x 5m in area, were
weapons, riding gear, jewellery, tools, vessels, gaming pieces andagricultural implements (for full descriptions of the objects see
Miiller-Wille 1978, 51-8; a list is given in Appendix 1 below).
After being burnt, the ship was closed in the mound after the area
outside the vertical stones had been carefully swept. The barrowwas composed of shingle, clay and sand, and raised over 5m highand 20m in diameter.
As to the date of the burial, Miiller-Wille suggests the second
half of the tenth century on the basis of the Mammen style decoration on one of the swords, though he does allow a 'Spielraum'(Miiller-Wille 1978, 68). However, much of the material dates tothe late ninth/early tenth century; sufficient perhaps to give a more

66/384ft

Saga-Book

limits of mound;'SS concentrations of objects

standing stones(Diron cauldron

standing stones on horizontal slabs

O

bronze vessels

burnt area
Fig. 24. Plan of the He de Groix ship burial (after du Chatellier and le Pontois
1908-9, scale added).

The Vikings in Brittany

67/3855cm

Fig. 25. The swords and scabbard chape from the He de Groix ship burial (P. A.
Emery after Muller-Wille 1978).

general date for the cremation of 900-1000. (A detailed discussionof the dating is beyond the scope of this paper, but see thecomprehensive listing of parallels with Arbman and Nilsson 19668, 184-92 in Muller-Wille 1978, 58-70. A date of c. 900 is favoured
by Br0ndsted 1965, 83 and Breese 1977, 48. 7) Overall, the burial
has a Norwegian cultural background in a rather older tradition(see Fell 1980), but the artefact assemblages indicate links withFrance and perhaps also Ireland (Muller-Wille 1978,68-9; Arbman
and Nilsson 1966-8, 192). In general, its closest parallel is tomounds one and three at Myklebost in Norway; its Norwegianaffinities have been supported by Musset (1965, 124).
Is the Groix tomb that of a later sea raider, well after the periodof occupation in the early tenth century (Sawyer 1982a, 98), or is68/386

Saga-Book

15cm

A

\
Fig. 26. Axes, arrowheads and lanceheads from the He de Groix ship burial (fromMuller-Wille 1978; reprinted by kind permission).

69/387

The Vikings in Brittany

15cm

Fig. 27. A selection of shield bosses from the He de Groix ship burial (fromMuller-Wille 1978; reprinted by kind permission).

70/388

Saga-Book

15cm

Fig. 28. Iron cauldron, bronze vessels and chain from the He de Groix ship burial(from Muller-Wille 1978; reprinted by kind permission).

it contemporary with the 919-937 invasion? There is no way toobtain a definite solution, but I would argue for contemporaneity
for several reasons. Firstly, the Norwegian background, especially
its militantly old-fashioned paganism, seems to fit well with thepicture of the invaders as anachronistic Viking warriors at the timeof settlement and conversion elsewhere as discussed in chapter
2. Secondly, the parallels with the Westfold ship burials are
particularly striking given the probable origin of Rpgnvaldr and his
followers; and finally the burial ritual seems far too elaborate tobe the work of peripatetic sea raiders. The Groix burial is totally
isolated in Europe; it is the only known Viking cremation outside
Scandinavia (Foote and Wilson 1970,407), with the possible exception of Ingleby. It is tempting to suggest that a burial of such

The Vikings in Brittany

71/38915cn

Fig. 29. Tools from the He de Groix ship burial (from Muller-Wille 1978;
reprinted by kind permission).

magnificence could only have been for a chieftain of pre-eminent
status. Is it possible that Groix was the last resting place of one of
the Nantes leaders mentioned by Flodoard? Possible, but unfortunately not provable. One last point that could link the burial to
the Nantes Vikings is Arbman and Nilsson's suggestion (1966-8,
191) that the unusual star-shaped shield bosses, with no known
parallels, are in fact products of the Loire. It would certainly benatural for a mobile fighting force to maintain and manufacture its
own weapons, and perhaps even unavoidable for the isolated
Scandinavians in Brittany. Once again, this must remain hypothesis
until further evidence is uncovered.
Two of the objects deserve special mention. The burial provided
the only known example of a stern ornament from a Viking ship
(several prow vanes have survived): a 60cm diameter circular bandof metal with leaves and movable rings around its edge, probably
a 'dragon's tail' like that depicted on a runestone from Smiss,
Stenkyrka, on Gotland (see Arbman 1961, 82-4, pi. 21). The otherunusual artefact was regarded as an object of unknown function

72/390

Saga-Book

I ~i \
tii' .** v* - f-V'\-V•----•• ol^ ;'^\><:»•--. .•-.•••..

15cm

Fig. 30. Jewellery, fittings, belt equipment, gaming pieces and a clench nail fromthe He de Groix ship burial (from Muller-Wille 1978; reprinted by kind permission).

by the original excavators, but identified as a bent lancehead by
Muller-Wille (1978, 53) and Arbman and Nilsson (1966-8,188-9).
Wilson has recently cited a parallel on the Bayeux Tapestry, wherea man standing in the water next to a ship is depicted holding a
curved rod (1985, 175). It is most likely however, that what the
tapestry shows is a type of angled chisel used for working grooves
on ship timbers (illustrated in McGrail 1980, 53).

Weapons
The only other specifically Scandinavian objects from Brittany
are weapons, found by chance. Two swords have been discovered

The Vikings in Brittany

73/391

Fig. 31. The stern ornament from the He de Groix ship (above), diameter 60cm
(from Muller-Wille 1978) and (below) the ship depicted on the stone from Smiss,
Stenkyrka, on Gotland (P. A. Emery after photo in Arbman 1961).

74/392

Saga-Book

Fig. 32. Above: the controversial lancehead from the He de Groix ship burial(from Miiller-Wille 1978; reprinted bykind permission). Top left: the figure
from the Bayeux Tapestry holding anangular object which Wilson (1985, 175)has compared to the He de Groix lancehead. The Tapestry probably depicts atype of angled wood-working chisel usedin shipbuilding and shown bottom left(from McGrail 1980).

The Vikings in Brittany

75/393on the He de Biece where Godfred's Danes were besieged by
Sidroc's fleet in alliance with Erispoe in 854, two more of type H
have been found in the Sens and at the confluence of the Loire
and Chezine, and another type H sword was reported from Nantes
in the nineteenth century (all these weapons are described by
Arbman and Nilsson 1966-8, 166-71). Considering the amount of
Viking activity around the Loire, so few finds are surprising, but
it is likely that many of the Prankish weapons that have been
discovered were in fact used by Scandinavians (Arbman and Nilsson 1966-8, 192).

Monasteries, rural settlements and commerce

Despite the dearth of recognisably Scandinavian finds in Brit­tany, the archaeological reflection of the Breton reaction to theraids is also of value. Of particular interest are the results of
excavations at ecclesiastical centres. At Landevennec work hasrevealed the reconstruction of the church after it was destroyedby the Vikings in 913, including a superb tile floor, c. 950 onarchaeomagnetic dating (Bardel, Barral i Altet and Caziot 1984,81-2). Wooden remains from the late ninth-century church havebeen located below the burnt levels of the Scandinavian attack, as
have re-used pieces of worked stone from the church built into thelater tenth-century structure. Carolingian coins of the early tenthcentury have also been found (for the latest reports see Bardel
1985-7). Viking destruction debris has been excavated at SaintMalo (Langouet 1976 and 1979) and at the monastery on the He
Lavret, attacked in 884, along with finds of Carolingian pottery
and jewellery (Giot 1983-5; 1987).
Several more monasteries and churches occupied at the time of
the Scandinavian raids have been located, such as the crypt andrelics found at Lanmeur along with gold pendants datable to theearly tenth century (Guigon 1986). The Breton clergy favoured
isolated hermitages as well as churches, following the example ofSaint Samson. Some were attacked by the Vikings, including
Locoal (CR 326); this site has not been excavated but it probably
followed the Irish model as found elsewhere in Brittany, at SaintHerv6-en-Lanrivoare (Cleac'h and Letissier 1976) and Saint-Saturnin-en-Plomeur, where several oratories have been recorded(Giot 1975 and 1976; Giot and Monnier 1978). A contemporary
cemetery with ninth-century burials at Salle des Fetes, Corseul has

76/394

Saga-Book>1SOB

Fig. 33. The excavated remains of the monastery on the He Lavret raided by the
Vikings in 884 (after Privat 1971).

also been excavated (Fichet de Clairfontaine 1986); the Breton
cemetery evidence is reviewed by Guigon, Bardel and Batt (1987).
Several coin hoards have been found as well, which may indicate
attempts to hide wealth from Viking attack; notable examples are
the hoard of c. 920-923 excavated at the church of Saint-Melaine
at Rennes (Chedeville and Guillotel 1984, 384) and the Priziac
hoard of more than 2000 coins (Davies 1988, 56).
Little is known about the rural settlements of this period, butthey may have been similar to the eleventh-century village un­covered at Lann-Gouh Melrand, with its cluster of rectangularstone houses (Andr6 1982; compare with Meirion-Jones 1982,
chapter 8). The study of rural life in Brittany and its landscapecontext will be considerably advanced with the publication of the
Oust-Vilaine watershed surveys that have been carried out by
Astill and Davies since 1982 (see their 1982 and 1985 reports).
The nature of Breton commerce has been briefly referred to inchapter 2 but the archaeological evidence can add a little to the
picture. The pottery industry appears to have been quite advanced,

The Vikings in Brittany

77/395

with distinctive forms produced at Meudon, near Vannes (Andre,
Barrere, Batt and Clement 1984 and Triste 1985-7) and Trans(Hodges 1981b, 74-5), examples of which have been found at
Pledeliac, dated 920-980 (Henry 1983, 313). A possible additional
kiln has been identified at Guipel (Lanos 1983). It is not possible
to say at present whether these industries were maintained during
the Scandinavian occupation, but no pottery has been found in
definite association with Viking artefacts at the Camp de Peran.
Full ceramic chronologies have not yet been developed for thisperiod (see Hodges 1981b, 74-5) which would enable a definite
statement to be made. As to other industries, the presence of quern
quarries in eastern Brittany has been suggested (Hodges 1982,124), and some local production of linen smoothers is likely, as
the examples from Treguennec show (see Hodges 1982, 122 andHaevernick 1963, 130-8).
Before turning to the Norman material, which may be used tofill gaps in the archaeology of Brittany, the Breton evidence should
be briefly reviewed. The finds at the Camp de Peran would seemto support the argument made in chapter 2 for Scandinavian
occupation outside the Nantes area, and together with the Trans
excavations serve to confirm aspects of the historical record of
Alain Barbetorte's return. The scattered pattern of fortifications
throughout the Breton countryside emphasises the preoccupation
with local defence rather than organised resistance, and it is not
hard to see how such a system would collapse under pressure
from a large military force. Finds of Scandinavian weapons also
corroborate the documentary sources, as do the destruction levels
at the monasteries. The He de Groix burial remains slightly prob­
lematic due to its ambiguous date, but it does not contradict theideas set out in chapter 2 and can considerably support them if it
is interpreted as a territorial statement, like the Manx examples.
Only the commercial evidence remains a serious problem; while
the Vikings do not seem to have had recognisable mercantile
interests in Brittany, much more work is required before we canbe sure.

Normandy
Given Normandy's origins of Viking settlement it is not surpris­
ing that the region has produced more Scandinavian artefacts
than Brittany; what is remarkable is the relative lack of material

78/396

Saga-Booknc'Fig. 34. Part of the eleventh-century Breton village at Lann-Gouh Melrand (after
Mauny in Andr6 1982).

compared to areas like the Danelaw. As in Brittany, the mostimpressive remains are fortifications. At La Hague, at the tip of
the Cherbourg peninsula, a great dyke encloses more than fivesquare miles of land including two deep-water bays and the only
natural harbour on this stretch of coast. Originally thought to dateto 900-800 B.C., the earthwork has been shown by excavation to
be a two-phase construction, with the prehistoric ramparts beingrefortified in the ninth or tenth century (de Boiiard 1964b). It
seems likely that the defences were elaborated to protect thenatural landing stage and that the dyke was of Viking construction

The Vikings in Brittany

79/397(the name La Hague is of Scandinavian origin, one of only threepagi names to change to a Norse word; see Fellows-Jensen 1988,
119-20). The Scandinavians may have needed protection against
Breton raids (the Cotentin had been ceded to Brittany in the midninth century) and it is possible that during the early years of the919-937 occupation the La Hague occupants were allied to the
Breton Vikings; it is certainly recorded that the Scandinavians of
this area were hostile to the Seine Vikings. Local tradition tells of
a- Viking called Moeren operating from La Hague around 960,
folklore which may contain some truth (see de Boiiard 1953 andArbman's 1953 excavation report). Gillian Fellows-Jensen has
suggested that the name may indicate a man from Maeren in Norway(pers. comm.), an interesting possibility considering that the nameas we have it is almost certainly corrupt. Scandinavian burials arereported to have been found in the vicinity of the dyke (Bates
1982, 19).
A female Scandinavian grave has been excavated at Pitres, withgrave goods of pottery and two type P41 oval brooches. Their lateninth-century date implies that the woman was a camp follower of
the Great Army on its rampages around Rouen (the find is publi­
shed by Elmqvist 1966-8, who discusses the dating and parallels
209-23). The most enigmatic burials in Normandy may not be
Scandinavian at all; at Reville, on the Cotentin coast, slab-con­structed graves of several types were exposed by shifting sand in
the early 1960s. Hasty excavation recorded stone settings in the
shape of ship outlines, low cairns and rectangular lintel graves.
The cairns contained decomposed vegetal matter and crematedbone, while the ship settings, 3-65m to 2-15m at the beam, pre­served a few crumbling bone fragments covered by peat and flint.
The lintels contained skeletons with carefully placed stone slabs
covering them, with a crude quartz-tempered pot in one grave. All
the graves were at the same level, the rectangular lintels oriented
E/W or NW/SE and the ships broadly E/W. No dating processes
have been applied to the bones, so all dating must rely on thetypology of the only artefact, the pot. This has close parallels withthe vessels found in graves 24 and 151 at Birka (Arbman 1940-43,
9, 66; see Fig. 36), and de Boiiard argues for a parallel with a pot
from Jarlshof (1964a; Hamilton 1956, 82 number 2); the Jarlshof
example does not seem sufficiently close but the Reville pot showsdefinite affinities with the Slav-inspired flat-bottomed vessels of
Sjaelland and 0resund, as found at Trelleborg (Helen Clarke,pers. comm.; the pottery is illustrated by Roesdahl 1982, 122-3).

fortifications

A burials•

Fig. 35. Scandinavian sites and finds in Normandy.

N

SOka

I

*e>

00

The Vikings in Brittany

81/399While the burials seem initially like Scandinavian ship settings (asfound at Lindholm H0je) superimposed on Prankish lintel graves,the lack of inter-cutting features and the pseudo-Scandinavian pot
in a lintel grave make the hypothesis tenuous; in addition, we haveinsufficient knowledge of prehistoric burial types in this area torule out an earlier date. The R6ville graves must remain problem­
atic until either the bones are dated or further comparative work
is done.

Sen

Fig. 36. Pots from Birka graves 24 (below) and 151 (above), comparable to thevessel from the R6ville burial (P. A. Emery after Arbman 1940-43).

Scandinavian place-names can provide much information as tothe settlement patterns in early Normandy, but only the data

82/400

Saga-Book

relating to Brittany will be discussed here (for place-name studies
in general, see the references in the second section of this chapter
above). Fellows-Jensen (1988, 115-16) has noted that the Bretteville names on the Normandy coast may signify ninth-century
settlement of Bretons as a deliberate policy of the Prankish kings
to provide a buffer against Viking attack, but could equally relate
to Bretons who came with the Scandinavian settlers in the tenthcentury. In Bessin and Maine, the lack of Scandinavian placenames may indicate that the cession of 924 recorded by Flodoard
may have failed as a colony and was exposed to more limited
Scandinavian influence (Fellows-Jensen 1988, 115). This latter
point could well affect our perception of RQgnvaldr's career during
his campaigns with Hrolfr's army after the 919 occupation of
Brittany, as discussed in chapter 2 at the end of the 4th section(but see Bates 1982, 9-10).
Turning to the finds of Scandinavian weaponry discovered acci­
dentally over the years, we find a picture similar to that in Brittany.
Many weapons must have been lost during the Viking raids ofthe ninth century and the Norman power struggles of the tenth;
Neustria saw the most concentrated fighting of the entire Viking
Age in France (see Werner 1985). Swords have been found at
Vernon and Elbeuf, and a type G axe has been dredged from the
Seine at les Andelys. The Seine has also produced swords of types
M and Y. The only other Scandinavian weapon known from
Normandy is a type H lance-head found at Evreux (see Arbman
and Nilsson 1966-8, 163-75 for descriptions of all these weapons).
In addition a horse bit of a type found in Scandinavian tenthcentury graves was discovered in the vicinity of Rouen (Arbman
1961, 201).
Normandy has also produced two major coin hoards. In 1963,
the largest hoard ever found in France was uncovered within the
castrum area at Fecamp, dated 970-990 and containing 4400 pieces(see de Bouard 1963; Yver 1969, 341). However, from the Breton
viewpoint the most important hoard is that found at Mont-SaintMichel (Dolley and Yvon 1971). Among its contents was a coinbearing in corrupt form the legend VVILEIM DU(X?) BRI. Does
this mean that William Longsword was issuing coins as Duke of
the Bretons? If so, the substance of Dudo of Saint-Quentin's claims
for Norman rule in Brittany may not be complete fiction (Bates
1982, 9; Dolley and Yvon 1971, 7-11).
By studying the late Neustrian and early Norman settlements
we may find a reflection of a similar pattern in Brittany where theThe Vikings in Brittany

83/401

Fig. 37 Coin of William Longsword (reigned c. 925-942) found in the MontSaint-Michel hoard. Legend reads: Obverse: + WILEIM D(reversed)VX (or +)IRB(reversed) for WILEIM DUX BRI(TONUM) Reverse: + RIWALLON v(probably the name of the moneyer). Diameter 2 cm (P. A. Emery after photo by
Pilet-Lemiere).

archaeology is lacking. For fortified residences, le Maho (1980)
has published several studies of early earthworks at Saint-L6,
Radicatel, Beaubec-la-Rosiere and Quettehon along with his workon earlier timber structures in Normandy (Halbout and le Maho
1984). The excavations at Mirville show the range of buildings
constructed in the eleventh century, with a complex of longhouse,stables and outbuildings which has remarkable pictorial parallels
on the Bayeux Tapestry (Halbout and le Maho 1984,57-61). Thesemay be applied to slightly earlier settlements in eastern Brittany.
More relevant still are the late ninth-century houses found at SaintMartin de Mondeville, with finds of pottery, jewellery and carved
memorial stones (Lorren 1985), and the Carolingian domestic
buildings at Les Rues-des-Vignes and Brebieres (Florin 1985). A
complete landscape study has been carried out at Plessis Grimoult,with a survey of all known place-names, settlements, parish records
and archaeology in the region of a fortified enclosure which wasthen excavated to reveal the internal structures (see Zadora-Rio
1974 for the full report).
Turning to higher-status sites, a massive contrast with the Bretonmaterial is seen. Annie Renoux's long-running excavations at
Fecamp have produced an occupation sequence at the chateau site
dating back to the eighth century. An eighth- to ninth-century
monastery with two successive chapels developed into a luxury
residence in the late ninth century with finds of fine-quality metalwork, coins and pottery (see Renoux 1987, 15-20). By the early84/402

Saga-Book

tenth century the structures had been abandoned and the land
converted to agricultural use by a small fanning community. Verylittle effect of the Viking raids is apparent, an observation echoed
on many other sites (Renoux 1987, 14). Between 927 and 932
William Longsword built his first residence at Fecamp, a modest
building but well-placed for access to water and trade routes. Fromthen on the site was developed with more elaborate ducal palaces
and a castle, ultimately becoming a fortified abbey in the thirteenth
century (see Renoux 1975; 1979; 1985; and 1987 for full reports).
Similar residences that might have been expected in Brittany
have not appeared; even considering the limited nature of Breton
medieval archaeology to date, the contrast seems to reinforce theconclusions of chapter 2 about the tendency to isolationism in the
area.
Finally, we must seek a parallel for the Viking capital at Nantes.
Almost nothing is known about the city in the early medieval
period (the archaeology is reviewed by Barral i Altet 1984, andsee Verhulst 1985, 336), but a rough comparison may be madewith Tours. Both cities contained similar numbers of churches,suffered equally at Viking hands and experienced much the same
expansionist boom after the removal of the Scandinavian threat(Galinie 1978; see Audin 1987 for the Touraine region). However,Galini6's excavations in Tours have demonstrated that the disloca­
tion in occupation was not nearly as great as might have been
expected from the documentary sources. At Saint-Martin's, forexample, despite the recorded removal of relics in 853, the com­munity obviously continued to function (Galinid 1978,44). Part of
the reason may be the sheer difficulty involved in evacuation; fora farming community such a move would mean economic suicide.
Perhaps the total invasion of Brittany provided an exception tothis, unforeseen circumstances which really did result in devas­
tation. While the picture of Brittany laid waste is not significantly
altered, in the light of Galini6's work we must have reservations
about the actual conditions in early tenth-century Nantes until
more excavations have been completed.

Prankish finds in Scandinavia

Turning lastly to Prankish artefacts found in Scandinavia, we
see that the ninth-century raiding is certainly reflected in Carolingian loot (though not so much in hoarded coinage; see Musset

The Vikings in Brittany

85/4031954a, 33 for his theory that the Danegeld payments were melteddown). A full discussion is obviously beyond the range of thispaper, but if we take Birka and Hedeby as representative of thegrave goods material, fibulae and mounts of Carolingian workman­
ship have been found in many burials (the finest are graves 507,
526, 550 and 649 at Birka and 269 at Hedeby; for full lists ofCarolingian material in Scandinavian graves see Arbmann 1937;
Callmer 1977, 12-32, 230; Wamers 1985; the earlier Merovingianevidence is discussed in Bendixen 1974). Even allowing for thepresence of some Prankish merchants in Scandinavia, the amountof Carolingian wealth that was taken back to the Viking homelands
was obviously considerable.
As to future archaeological strategy in Brittany, a problemorientation approach would clearly serve best for extending ourunderstanding of the Viking occupation. While most excavation
obviously relies primarily on opportunity and finance, investigationof more rural settlements and monasteries needs to be carried out
to examine the effects of dislocation resulting from the occupation. 8
An extensive open-area excavation in a large fortress would surely
illuminate the nature of the Scandinavian presence itself, with theCamp de P6ran being ideally suited for a research programme.
Above all, excavations are needed in Nantes, the heart of Scandina­vian Brittany, as it is in this city that the answers to our questionslie.

4. CONCLUSION: BRITTANY IN THE VIKING WORLDIn the two preceding chapters the historical and archaeologicalevidence for the Scandinavians in early medieval Brittany has beenassessed against the general background of western European
politics. It has become apparent that after the raiding of theninth century Brittany underwent a profound change from the
Scandinavian viewpoint, a familiar pattern echoed elsewhere andsimilarly reflected in the excavated material. In order to understandthis more fully, in addition to reviewing the Bretons' changing
relationships with the Carolingians and Anglo-Saxons, we must
compare the history of Scandinavian contact with Brittany withthat in the other Scandinavian settlements and areas of operationsin the west. Such a comparison is particularly valuable for assessing

86/404

Saga-Book

the importance of trading networks and the growth of Breton
independence.
First, it is helpful to examine briefly the composition and logisticsof the raiding forces themselves, for which the records of theGreat Army's campaigns in Wessex preserved in the Anglo-Saxon
Chronicle are of great value since they give a much fuller accountof its movements and actions than the Continental sources. Given
that the various ravages, winter bases and marches of the Great
Army of Danes and its predecessors have been mapped and dis­cussed by Hill (1981, maps 46-64 and annotations), the present
treatment will be confined to what the English sources tell us of
the army itself. 9
It is obvious that the Great Army was no mere raiding force orloose assembly of opportunists. From the precision of its move­ments and base locations in the 880s and 890s in England it musthave had a cohesive command structure with powers of delegationand intact lines of communication and supply. To suggest that sucha host simply moved about the countryside supporting itself fromthe land, without fairly advanced reconnaissance and prior know­
ledge, would certainly be unjustified.
Some indication of the magnitude of the army's influence issurely contained in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle entry for 893, when
the Danes marched to Boulogne after campaigning in France ond
peer wurdon gescipode 'and were there provided with ships', a fleet
estimated later in the annal as at least 250 vessels. This may
perhaps have involved a coercive or cooperative arrangement witha local town or an area sympathetic to the Danes, as is indicatedtoo in the Chronicle entry for 866 when the East Anglians provided
the army with horses. The Great Army may have operated ascoordinated royal bands, surviving continual re-formation anddivision, as in 879, absorbing reinforcements as necessary to replacelosses sustained in battle or resulting from elements of the army
choosing to settle (Brooks 1979, though see chapter 2 above forthe looseness of the term 'kings' at this period; Christopherson
1981-2 discusses the intricate structure and loyalty of the royalretinues in Scandinavia, together with conditions of service andreward).
The size of Viking armies at this time is also open to question,with considerable differences of opinion. Sawyer has argued thatthe hosts numbered only a few hundred men and that the sources
tend to exaggerate (1971, 123-32), but Brooks (1979) has put
forward a convincing refutation of this by comparing a wide variety

The Vikings in Brittany

87/405of sources from all over Europe, and finding a broad uniformityof estimates for fleet sizes. While some references are more likely
to be gross distortions (such as the 600-ship raid on Hamburg in845), Brooks notes that major armies are usually described ascomprising 50-250 ships, with 100-200 not uncommon. The tacticsof the Vikings seem to vary in accordance with the size of theirarmies, as do the corresponding defensive measures taken against
them; compare the situations in Belgium (d'Haenens 1967) andFrisia (Braat 1954, especially 225; Trimpe Burger 1973) with theburh system (Brooks 1979). The effect of the Viking occupationon the surrounding areas during these campaigns has been exam­
ined by Brooks and Graham-Campbell 1986, 108 by comparing
dated hoard depositions with the location of Great Army winterbases.
The Loire army operating in Brittany seems to have beensmaller, possibly a force from Westfold in Norway, numbering 7080 ships. Though a separate force, its leaders may have connections
with the Great Army via Ragnarr Io6br6k and his 'sons', together
with Hasteinn (discussed by Brooks 1979, but see Smyth 1977,1735; the dispute about Smyth's work was mentioned in chapter 1).

The kingdom of YorkYork, more than any other of the Scandinavian colonies, pro­vides a particularly clear contrast to the Viking occupation of
Brittany. Although only 0-025% of the estimated area of theViking Age city has been excavated so far, the work of the YorkArchaeological Trust has revealed a bustling commercial centre
with trading connections spreading throughout the Viking world.
Commanding the vital north-south land route along the Vale ofYork and situated at the confluence of the Ouse and Foss rivers,
York occupied a similar strategic position to Nantes with its control
over the mouth of the Loire. The city was taken by the Vikings in
866 and 867, but full settlement did not begin until 876. The
situation remained turbulent until the early 920s, with a series of
Scandinavian rulers governing the city, issuing coinage from c. 900
which shows considerable affinities with Carolingian examples (seeDolley 1978 for a review of the Viking coinage; and Pirie 1986 forthe excavated evidence, especially p. 54 and plate IV for compari­son with the P6ran coin). The early tenth century saw a contest
for power in the city between the Danes and the Norse from

88/406

Saga-Book

Dublin, with a Hiberno-Norse victory at Tettenhall in 910. Ragnallof Dublin took command in 914, to be followed by more Irish
Vikings until jEthelstan's conquest of the city in 927, after which
it remained in English hands until 939. From that year York was
ruled by Scandinavians until the death of Eirikr b!650x in 954,
when it was absorbed into the Anglo-Saxon kingdom. (A brief
guide to York's history may be found in Hall 1984, 43-66; see also
Smyth 1978 and Sawyer 1978.)
Under Scandinavian rule York's economy flourished as a resultof the new commercial contacts brought by the invaders (therelationship of Jorvik to its Anglian predecessor Eoforwic is still
uncertain). Evidence of the city's prosperity was unearthed inabundance at 16-22 Coppergate, and in 1989 at the Queen's Hotelsite in Micklegate, where a series of craftsmen's tenements was
excavated, excellently preserved in the waterlogged soil. In thebuildings and backyards, crowded along a street frontage, evidence
was found of woodworking, shoemaking, leather-working, jewel­lery manufacture in several precious metals, needle and comb
manufacture and coin minting, along with pottery and a full en­
vironmental record (see Hall 1981). 10 York's prosperity as a trad­
ing centre led to a flourishing of Anglo-Scandinavian stone
sculpture with distinctive regional styles (see Lang 1978 and 1984).
The contrast between the booming commerce of J6rvik, with its
links to Scandinavia, the Continent and the East, and Vikingoccupied Nantes is obvious and striking. However, Brittany cer­tainly offered potential for trade of this kind; the extensive Breton
commercial network has been mentioned above, and mints are
known from Rennes and Nantes (McKitterick 1983,244). None ofthis mercantile apparatus seems to have been maintained by the
Loire Vikings. York has numerous documentary references to its
economic functions in addition to archaeological confirmation,
Nantes has none at all. Despite the damage done to the Carolingian
empire by the Scandinavian raids, in view of their past record ofadvantageous alliances it seems likely that the Franks would havebeen willing to set up at least a basic trading system with Viking
Brittany in the early tenth century, if one had been offered. Close
commercial ties and a degree of economic interdependence would
also have lessened the Scandinavian threat to Frankia. In later
tenth-century York, although it was then under nominal AngloSaxon control, there coexisted definite English and Scandinavian
communities which traded freely. On this evidence, the conclusionthat the occupation of Brittany was never intended to establish an

The Vikings in Brittany

89/407

independent commercial state like York is inescapable. While itis unlikely that any such commercial drive existed as a deliberate
policy of the first Scandinavians who settled in northern Englandand Normandy, in these areas the newcomers very soon began toestablish themselves as traders with an eye to the markets, as intowns like Hedeby. On present evidence this development isentirely absent from Brittany.

Celtic Britain: Wales, Cornwall and Scotland
If we turn to the Celtic regions in the west of Britain, a different
picture again emerges. In Wales it is not yet clear whether theViking impact consisted simply of a succession of raids and contin­
ual small wars, or involved a definite crisis and confrontation asin Wessex. In discussing such events in relation to the source
material, we must remember that from the viewpoint of a contem­
porary Anglo-Saxon or Welsh chronicler the Viking situation canrarely have seemed anything but bleak and hopeless.
The Welsh political background seems to have consisted of apattern of allegiance to small groups and individuals, but organised
into rudimentary territorial units and kingdoms such as Gwynedd.
Wales shows a history of alternately hostile and interactive re­lationships with England like that we see between Brittany andthe Carolingian Empire, and also a similar pattern of Viking
raiding except that in Wales the attacks continue until c. 954. Like
Brittany, Wales offered poor prospects for conquest in the ninth
century, owing to a mixture of geographical factors and perhaps
the relative poverty of the Welsh compared with the targets in
England. From the 850s, raiding was initially confined to the northand south coasts but in the later ninth century there were probing
attacks through the lowlands, linked to the assault on Wessex.
Gwynedd also had a strong leader in Rhodri Mawr until 878, justas did the Bretons in leaders like Nominoe and Salomon.
The raids persisted into the mid tenth century, with the emphasis
shifting to the exiled Dublin Norse after 902. By this time Wales
had achieved a measure of unstable cohesion and independence
similar to that in Brittany, under the direction of Hywel Dda
who fought the Vikings in alliance with the Anglo-Saxons, which
parallels the Franko-Breton campaigns in France. In Wales too,
the Scandinavians became part of the existing political scene, which
added an extra factor to the civil power struggles. The extent of

90/408

Saga-Book

Anglo-Welsh connections under Hywel is shown by the Welsh
absence from Brunanburh (see the discussions of the Armes Prydein in chapters 1 and 2 above, and the references to the Vinheidr
campaign in Egils saga Skalla-Grimssonar 1933, chs. 51-5; further
accounts of this period are given in Loyn 1976 and 1977,35-62 andDavies 1982a, chapter 4). The lack of serious Viking assault at thistime was also due to the peripheral position of Wales in relation
to the main colonies in Ireland and the Danelaw.
With the deaths of Hywel Dda (c. 950) and Eirikr b!6Q0x (954)
the Scandinavian impetus against Wales increased. Although thiswas still generally limited to raiding, concentration on the Bristol
Channel and the Chester region is evident from the place-names,
which show possible settlement around Milford and perhaps theestablishment of basic trading posts in Pembrokeshire (see Davies
1982a, 116-20 and Loyn 1976); Anglesey may also have been
occupied for a time. These settlements seem to have been tempor­ary and the majority of the Scandinavian place-names are navi­
gation points. There were certainly no substantial fortified centres
like those in Ireland. The meagre documentary sources and thearchaeology (limited to eight hoards and a few problematic piecesof sculpture, see Davies 1982a, 117-9 and Boon 1986, appendix)
reinforce this picture.
The northern and southern colonies, if such they were, seem tohave been maintained into the early eleventh century as a resultof their proximity to the Danelaw and Man in the north, andBristol's links with the southern kingdom of Knutr and Sveinn (theBristol slave-trade may be referred to by Wulfstan in 1014). It is
Wales's connections with areas of major Scandinavian interests
which Brittany lacked, and which make the Vikings' failure to
exploit the great centre at Nantes so unusual. But despite the close
involvement of Wales in the political and military upheavals of
the Irish Sea and the Danelaw, the ultimate Scandinavian impact
there remains comparable with that in Brittany; in each case it had
little linguistic or institutional effect, but was a significant factor
in the development of independence and opposition to the AngloSaxons and Franks respectively.
The documentary evidence for Scandinavian influence inCornwall is even more scarce than that for Wales. There is one
ninth-century reference to a Cornish-Danish alliance against
Ecgbryht of Wessex in 838, and there were Danish campaigns inthe south-west in 981, 982, 988, 997 and 1001 (the sources arereviewed by Wakelin 1976-7). The Vikings seem to have fought asThe Vikings in Brittany

91/409mercenaries in the Cornish struggles for autonomy, as in Wales
and Brittany, but generally appear to have restricted their activities
to raiding. Lydford, Tavistock and Bodmin or Padstow are known
to have been sacked, but the Cornish put up a spirited defence in
988 and 1001, repulsing the Scandinavians from Exeter on thelatter occasion. Wakelin lists all the place-names and loan wordsof Scandinavian origin (1976-7, 46-7), all of which concern thesea and topography except for three which incorporate personalnames; together with a few interlace crosses in the Anglo-Scandina­vian styles of the Danelaw and three hogbacks (see Laing 1975,140), these are the only indications of settlement. With suchindirect and insubstantial evidence, no adequate model of Scandi­
navian activity in Cornwall can really be suggested, but it isinteresting to note the familiar pattern of Viking raiding andsimultaneous involvement in civil politics.
The Scottish material is peripheral to the subject of the Vikingsin Brittany, representing as it does the complete and lasting take­over of an area by the Scandinavians; Orkney and Shetland remai­
ned under autonomous Scandinavian control well into themedieval period. Scotland and the Northern Isles belong as muchto the North Atlantic sphere of Scandinavian operations as they
do to the Irish Sea, and as such the points of contact with Brittany
are slight. 11

IrelandYork has already been discussed as an example of a booming
trading centre in an area of basically English culture which wassettled and influenced by Scandinavians. In Ireland we see a similar
situation, but in a Celtic land and thus of great relevance toBrittany. After initial raids in the late eight century, the Vikings
established a longphort on the site of Dublin at the Liffey mouthin 841, which grew into a small settlement (of this early Dublin
settlement, only the cemetery has been located archaeologicaUy,
at Islandbridge; see Wallace 1985,103-5). Until 876 the Scandina­vians' interests lay mainly in Scotland and the Hebrides, but they
became progressively more involved in the struggles for power inYork. The Irish managed to expel the Dublin Norse in 902, as
mentioned above, and they did not return until 917, although they
are known to have remained on a few coastal islands. During their
exile the Norse established closer links with York and set up a

92/410

Saga-Book

dynasty there after their return to Ireland. By 919, the Vikings
had founded towns at Wexford, Waterford, Limerick and Cork.
Throughout the 920s and 930s the Hiberno-Norse were key figuresin the wars with jEthelstan, but after the Brunanburh disaster of
937 their interests were increasingly confined to Ireland. Their rdle
in Irish politics, similar to that in Wales and Brittany, grew lessinfluential as the tenth century advanced, with serious setbacks inthe 970s and 980s. By 1014 and the Battle of Clontarf, the zenithof Scandinavian power in Ireland was already long past.
Scandinavian activity in Ireland focused on the urban centres
more than on any other kind of settlement. The towns came tooccupy a position of considerable importance in the Irish civil strifeof the tenth and eleventh centuries; as new foundations, theirinfluence and monopoly of luxury imports and long-distance trade
led to a gradual shift in emphasis from prehistoric cult sites like
Tara and Cashel to the urban centres as symbols of power androyal authority.
As a result of large-scale redevelopment, archaeologists in
Dublin have been fortunate enough to uncover the remains ofmore than 200 structures of the early medieval period. Grouped
into four types, the buildings can be reconstructed as the homes andworkshops of metalworkers, jewellery manufacturers, weavers,
leather-workers and many other craftsmen; particularly fine woodcarvings have been preserved by waterlogging. Dublin's trading
connections, seen in the imported goods, stretched mainly north­wards to Scandinavia and Scotland but contact is also evident withEngland (an Anglo-Irish element may have played a significant
role in Dublin, see Wallace 1986) and the Carolingian Empire. 12
Between them, the commercial centres of Dublin and York domi­
nated the Scandinavian mercantile operations in the British Isles
and north-western Europe.
In spite of the dearth of archaeological evidence and the ambigu­
ous nature of much of the documentary material, it has beenpossible to construct a remarkably coherent picture of the Scandi­
navian impact on Brittany. Against the background of the dispersal
and settlement of the great Viking armies that had been character­istic of the ninth century, and seen in the context of the establish­
ment of the Duchy of Normandy, Brittany emerges as a final
target for the raiders and looters. Although small Viking raids on
England continued up to and even after the Norman Conquest, it
is only in Brittany that we see true Viking activity on such an

The Vikings in Brittany

93/411ambitious scale in the tenth century. As to its long-term effect on
Brittany, most scholars have argued for a minimal impact (cf.
Smith 1985 and Davies 1988, 24, 213). This is true to the extent
that there is nothing in the social organisation and institutions ofBrittany after 939 that is specifically due to Scandinavian influence.
To take this line, however, is to ignore the massive impact of theVikings as a catalyst for political coalition and the formation of an
independent Brittany. Without the deleterious effect of the Viking
raids on the Carolingian empire, it is arguable whether Brittany
would have developed the degree of autonomy that it enjoyed in
the mid to late tenth century.
In this paper I have tried to do no more than present a summaryof the evidence for the Vikings in Brittany and an assessment of
its significance. Much research remains to be done, especially on
the French sources; future archaeological work may radically alterour perception of this most enigmatic of Scandinavian colonies. It
is to be hoped that this paper can at least provide a basis for a
fuller understanding of the Vikings in Brittany.

APPENDIX ONEGAZETTEER OF SCANDINAVIAN SITES AND FINDS IN
BRITTANY AND NORMANDYAs a supplement to chapter 3, a gazetteer has been compiled
detailing all sites and finds of Scandinavian character known tothe present author which have been recorded in Brittany andNormandy. In one or two instances native Breton sites have been
included where evidence relating to Scandinavian activity has beenfound (for example, the early tenth-century destruction levels at
Landevennec), but only in cases where the attribution is reasonably
certain.
The gazetteer has been arranged alphabetically by site nameand is divided into two parts covering Brittany and Normandy
respectively, with a subsidiary section for unprovenanced finds
from the area. For site location, in addition to the relevant
departement, references have been given to the Institut
Geographique National standard 1:25000 maps of France; thismethod of location has been chosen in preference to the far more
precise cadastral survey of the nineteenth century (see Astill andDavies 1985, 103) for ease of reference for English readers.

Morbihan 0721/N

He de Groix

Loire-Atlantique1223/E

Loire-Atlantique1223/E.

Departement,
Map referencelie de Biece

He de Biece

Site name or
Find spot

Chance find fromriver Loire

Chance find fromriver Loire

Method of discovery/
Investigation

Ship cremation in
Excavation
mound withsurrounding stone
setting.
Mound contents: 8001000 rivets, 200 nails(llm-13m longship andpossible ship's boat)
Remains of one adultand one adolescent,dogs and birds
2 swords, types O/R
and H
Bronze scabbard chape
8 arrowheads,
Wegraeus' type A; 3 or
4 lance heads

Sword with curved
guard (Petersen 1919,
fig. 77, unclassified)Type H sword

Evidence

BRITTANY

Site was repeatedlyrobbed at night
during excavation,and excavators did
not recover all bone
and iron finds - theexisting finds are
therefore only aportion of theoriginal grave goods

Site of battle
between Seine andLoire Vikings in 854
See above

Remarks

du Chatellier and lePontois 1908-9;
Muller-WUle 1978;
Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 184-92

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 171

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 169-70

References

<5i
^
u>

5'
***§

to

s-

1

^
a

lie de Groix(continued)

Site name or
Find spot

Departement,
Map reference

15-24 shield bosses
2 axe heads, type G
6 iron buckles
2 iron spur-fragments
3 perforated bronze
mountsBronze buckle andstrap
2 silver hooked tags
Gold and silver
clothing applique'sGold and bronze finger
rings
2 bronze bowls
Iron cauldron withchain
2 iron buckets
Bronze animal-head
mount
Bronze rivetted mount
Circular iron mount
5 iron casket mounts
Iron and bronze strip
mount
Padlock

Evidence

Method of discovery/
Investigation

BRITTANY (continued)

Remarks
References

toI9th/10th-century
monastery withdestruction levels
attributable to 913
Viking attack

Finistere 0517/0

LandeVennec

Evidence

19 bone gaming pieces
2 bone dice
Anvil
Nail size gauge
HammerPliers2 drill fragments
Iron socket
SickleSlate whetstone
Iron knife
2 iron bodkins
Scissors
Iron stem-ornament

Departement,
Map reference

Ille de Groix(continued)

Site name or
Find spot

Excavation

Method of discovery/
Investigation

BRITTANY (continued)
Remarks

Bardel 1985-7;
Bardel, Barral i
Altet and Caziot
1984

References

CD
I'

i

9th-century monasterywith destruction levels
attributable to 884
Viking atlack

Type E sword

Type H sword

C6tes-du-Nord0814/E

Loire-Allan tique1223/E

Loire-Allan tique1223/E

C6tes-du-Nord0916/0He Lavret

Nantes, confluenceof the Loire andChezineNantesCamp de Peran

Vitrified circular
earthwork, with findsof York coin, c. 905925, helmet fragment
and lance ferrule

Trapezoid earthwork

Evidence

C6tes-du-Nord0815/0Departement,
Map reference

Lanlerf

Site name or
Find spot

Excavation

Chance find fromriver Loire

Chance find fromriver Loire

Excavation

UnexcavatedMethod of discovery/
Investigation

BRITTANY (continued)
References

Possible site of battle
between Alain
Barbetorte andVikings, 936

Nicolardot 1984-7;
Nicolardot, NissenJaubert andWimmers 1987;
Chedeville andTonnere 1987, 183

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 169-70

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 166-8

Giot 1983-5; 1987;
Privat 1971, 88

Possible Viking camp de la Borderie 1898,
388; Hamel-Simon,
Langouet, NourryDenayer and Mouton
1979, 47

RemarksI!

Os

Circular earthwork
with tenth-century
finds

Ille-et-Vilaine
1216/E

Ille-et-Vilaine
1216/E

Trans, Camp desHaies

Trans, Vieux M'Na

Trapezoid earthwork

Trapezoid earthwork

Ille-et-Vilaine
1115/0Saint Suliac

Monastery withdestruction levels
attributable to Viking
attackEvidenceIlle-et-Vilaine
1115/0Departement,
Map referenceSaint-MaloSire name or
Find spot

Surveyed but not
excavated

Excavation

Unexcavated

Excavation

Method of discovery!
Investigation

BRITTANY (continued)

Langouet 1976 and1979

References

Hamel-Simon,
Langouet, NourryDenayer and Mouton
1979; Guigon 1987a,
228; Ch6deville andTonnere 1987, 184
Possible Viking camp As aboveat battle of Trans

Possible siege campof Alain Barbetorte
at battle of Trans,
939

Possible Viking camp Hamel-Simon,
Langouet, NourryDenayer and Mouton
1979, 47

Remarks

S'
to
Ol

Eure
2012/E

Seine-Maritime
1912/EEure
2013/0Manche1110/E

Manche1215/EEure
2012/E

ElbeufEvreuxLa HagueMont-Saint-Michel

PitresDepartement,
Map reference

Les Andelys

Site name or
Find spot

Chance findChance find during
railway construction

Chance find fromriver Seine

Method of discovery!
Investigation

Female burial withgrave goods of 2 P41
oval brooches andpottery

Hoard containing coinissued by WilliamLongsword as duke ofBrittany
Excavation

Chance findLinear earthwork
Excavation
enclosing 5 sq. miles ofheadland. Viking
period C14 dates.
Burials reported in thevicinityType H lance head

Sword with curved
guard (Petersen 1919,
fig. 77, unclassified)Type G axe

Evidence

NORMANDY

Possible base ofwestern Seine
Vikings

Remarks

Elmqvist 1966-8

Dolley and Yvon
1971; Bates 1982, 9

de Bouard 1953 and1964b; Arbman 1953;
Bates 1982, 9

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 172

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 175

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 175

References

1
?f

1

h^
00

Manche1310/0Seine-Maritime
2011/0——Eure2113/0

—

—

Rouen

Seine river

Seine river

Vernon

Probably from theriver Seine

Probably from theriver Loire at
NantesDepartement,
Map reference

Re'ville

Site name or
Find spot
Method of discovery/
Investigation

Chance findChance find fromriver Seine during
bridge construction

Type Y sword

Sword(unclassified)Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 171—
Type I lance head
Bronze sword pommel

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 172

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 163-5
Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 165

Arbman 1961, 201

de Bouard 1964a

References

Arbman and Nilsson
1966-8, 165-6, 172

Ship settings may be
Scandinavian burials

Remarks—
Type V sword
Type A, G and M axes

UNPROVENANCED FINDS

Chance findChance findType M sword

10th-century horse-bit

Burials with stone ship Excavation
settings, cairns andrectangular lintel
gravesEvidence

NORMANDY (continued)

101/419

I
§
3

3<%
5
a:
1S'

APPENDIX TWOREGNAL LISTS AND TABLES
While researching the Vikings in Brittany I found it helpful tocompile brief lists of the successive rulers of the period in Brittany
and Normandy, together with a table summarising the activitiesof the main Scandinavian commanders operating in France. I
reproduce these here in the hope that they may provide an ad­
ditional point of reference for the text. (It should be noted that all
the dates given in the lists refer only to the length of reign, not tobirth and death).
A guide to the complexities of Carolingian politics, the various
territorial partitions of the Empire, and the distinctions and rival­
ries between emperors, kings and noble factions is essential; I
found the best visual summary to be the excellent set of genealogi­
cal tables and maps drawn up by Rosamond McKitterick (1983,
349-92), to which I refer the reader.
Rulers of Brittany from Nominoe to Alain II, 830-952
Nominee

830/831 - 851

Erispoe

851 - 857

Salomon857 - 874

Pascwethen and Guorhwant (joint rule)874 - 875

Judicael and Alain I 'the Great' (joint rule)875 - 888

Alain I 'the Great'888 - 907

Gurmhailon

907 - c. 914

Viking invasion and occupation: Ottarr, Haraldr,
Rognvaldr, Felekan and Inconc. 914 - 936

Alain II 'Barbetorte (Twisted-Beard)'

936 - 952

103/421

The Vikings in Brittany

Rulers of Normandy from Hrdlfr to William II, c. 911-1087
G<?ngu-Hr61fr (Rollo)c. 911 - c. 925

William I 'Longsword'c. 925 - 942

Richard I

942 - 996

Richard II

996 - 1026

Richard III

1026 - 1027

Robert I 'the Magnificent'1027 - 1035

William II 'the Bastard', 'the Conqueror'

1035 - 1087

Note: the title Dux 'Duke' is first mentioned in connection with Richard II in 1006:
there is no reliable evidence that the title was in use before this date (cf.
Bates 1982, chapter 4).

The principal Viking commanders operating in France, 850-950
Note: only time spent in France is indicated.
850,

.

_..

I

860

•g

Urticttu

ictlTlty

I.'

870
8SO
190
900

910
920

930
9*0
950

s• «>"

•H

li

,1
S

s s

! !

104/422
Notes

Saga-Book

1 A complete listing of saga references to Bretland can be found in Metzenthin
1941, 14-15.
2 A more detailed discussion of this theme will be found in a forthcoming paperby the present author (Price, forthcoming).
3 It is possible that there may have been some earlier Scandinavian contact with
Gaul, as in Spain from c. 795.
4 The question of the assumption of power in Neustria by the Seine Vikings andthe development of Normandy is of great relevance to Brittany, but available spacepermits only the briefest treatment. In general see Bates 1982; Davis 1976 andSearle 1984 give insights into the Normans' self-perception; for the transitional
settlement phase see Mussel 1985, de Bernard 1955 and Douglas 1947; Hr61fr isdiscussed by Douglas 1942, and the Scandinavian influences in Breese 1977, Yver
1969, 319-23, Mussel 1975b and Stenton 1945; for political development andinstitutions see Yver 1969, 316-19, as well as Mussel, Bouvris and Maillefer
1985; Douglas 1958 discusses the bishoprics and le Patourel 1944 considers Iheir
development; Mussel 1954a deals wilh Irade and Ihe army is covered by Nicolle
1987 and Wilson 1985.
5 The subject of relic translation has attracted a vast literature: for generalaccounts in addition to Guillotel's 1982 summary, see Musset 1965, 218-22; de laBorderie 1898, 302-25, 362-71, 507-18; Lol 1899. Specific monasteries and relics
are covered by Gasnault 1961 and Mabille 1868 (Saint-Martin), Riche" 1976 (SaintMalo), Guiilotel 1979 (Alet), de la Motte-Collas 1957 (Saint-Germain-des-Pr6s),
Merlet 1930 (Trtguier) and Oheix 1905 (Montreuil-sur-Mer). For the comparable
situation in Normandy see McKitterick 1983, 239.
* Gillian Fellows-Jensen has noted the following names which might conceivably
He behind Felekan: Fattach, Feoch&n, Fidlean, Fer-caille, Fiaccdn, Fiannacdn,
Finnacdn, FinnecMn, Foelledn and Folachtdn (pers. comm.).
7 Since initially going to press, James Graham-Campbell (pers. comm.) has
suggested that the knot patterns on the upper and lower faces of the guard of themore complete sword (Fig. 25) are related lo the earlier Borre-style 'ring-chain'motif and that the overall decoration is to be paralleled, for instance, by that on
certain 'bait-type' brooches of his sub-group C, dated by him to the first half of thetenth century (Graham-Campbell 1984, 32 and 1987,242). It therefore seems morereasonable to suggest a date range for the cremation of c. 900-950, placing it
squarely within the period of the Viking occupation.
8 An excellent example for future excavators of early medieval settlements has
now been set by Groenman-van Waateriage and van Wijngaarden-Bakker (1987),
with their reconstruction of the changing economy of Kootwijk, a tenth-century
Carolingian village in the Netherlands.
9 Hill's forthcoming companion volume to An Atlas of Anglo-Saxon England,
covering the Continental material, should provide a valuable source for the Vikingsin Brittany.
10 Most of the finds from Coppergate are to be published shortly but in theinterim see Hall 1984 (M a general account, Radiey 1971 for the economy (preCoppergate), MacGreger 1982 and Tweddle 1986 for finds from related sites,
Holdsworth 1978,5-10and 18-24 for the pottery (pre-Coppergate), Hall, Kenward,
Williams and Greig 1983 for the environment and MouWen and Tweddle 1986 forsettlement south-west of the Ouse. Finds from the other Danelaw towns are briefly
reviewed in Hall 1981, 1*0-39.
11 It is impossible to summarise the Scottish political picture in small space; theThe Vikings in Brittany

105/423

most recent discussions of the complex interactions between the Dal Riadans, Picts
and Vikings are to be found in Smyth 1984 and Crawford 1987, who also reviews
the Manx material and is particularly strong on the archaeological evidence. The
recent Pictish work is covered in Ralston and Inglis 1984, Friell and Watson 1984
and Small 1987. All these works have extensive bibliographies to provide further
reading.
12 A programme of full publication of the Dublin excavations is currently underway, but in the interim see 6 Riordain 1971 and 1976, de Paor 1976, Murray 1981,
Bradley 1984, Wallace 1985 and 1988a and c, Mitchell 1987, Lang 1988 and Wallace
and 6 Floinn 1988. A full Dublin bibliography will be found in Wallace 1988b.
Excavations in Waterford and Wexford are currently adding to our knowledge ofViking towns in Ireland, but as yet no reports are available. Irish social structurein the early medieval period is discussed in Byrne 1973.
Bibliography and abbreviations
AB = Annales Bertiniani
Adigard des Gautries, J. 1951. 'Les noms de lieux de la Manche attestes entre 911
et 1066', Annales de Normandie 1, 3-44.
Adigard des Gautries, J. 1952 and 1953. 'Les noms de lieux du Calvados attested
entre 911 et 1066', Annales de Normandie 2, 209-28; 3, 135-48.
Adigard des Gautries, J. 1954a. Les noms de personnes Scandinaves en Normandie
de 911 el 1066.
Adigard des Gautries, J. 1954b and 1955. 'Les noms de lieux de 1'Eure attestes
entre 911 et 1066', Annales de Normandie 4, 39-59; 5, 15-33.
Adigard des Gautries, J. 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959. 'Les noms de lieux de la Seine
Maritime attested entre 911 et 1066', Annales de Normandie 6, 119-34; 7, 13358; 8, 300-22; 9, 151-67, 273-83.
AE = Annales Engolismenses.
AF = Annales Fuldenses.
Albrechtsen, E. (tr.). 1979. Dudo. Normandiets Historic under def0rste Hertuger,
Almqvist, B. and Greene, D. (eds.). 1976. Proceedings of the Seventh Viking
Congress.
Andrd, P. 1982. 'Un village breton duXle siecle: Lann-Gouh Melrand (Morbihan)',Archeologie Medievale 12, 155-74.
Andre, P., Barrere, M., Batt, M. and Clement, C. 1984. 'Les fours des potiers duHaut Moyen Age de Meudon en Vannes', Vie Journies Nationale d'Archeologie
Merovingienne: Bulletin de Liaison 8, 83-4.
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. 1972. (Tr. Garmonsway, G. N.)
Annales Bertiniani. 1883. In MGHSSRG 48, 5. (Ed. Waitz, G.)
Annales Engolismenses. 1859. In MGHSS 16, 21. (Ed. Pertz, G.)
Annales Fuldenses. 1891. In MGHSSRG 1. (Ed. Pertz, G. and Kurze, F.)
Annales Regni Francorum. 1895. In MGHSSRG 6. (Ed. Pertz, G. and Kurze, F.)
Annales Vedastini. 1909. In MGHSSRG 12, 40-82. (Ed. de Simson, B.)
Annales Xantenses. 1909. In MGHSSRG 12, 1-39. (Ed. de Simson, B.)
Annals of Fulda. (Tr. Nelson, J. L.) Unpublished.
Annals of Saint-Benin. (Tr. Nelson, J. L.) Forthcoming.
Arbman, H. 1937. Schweden und das Karolingische Reich.
Arbman, H. 194CM3. Birka 1, Die Graber 1-2.
Arbman, H. 1953. 'Hague-Dike: les fouilles en 1951 et 1952', Meddelanden frdn
Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum.

106/424

Saga-Book

Arbman, H. 1961. The Vikings.
Arbman, H. and Nilsson, N-O. 1966-8. 'Arraes Scandinaves de I'e'poque Viking
en France', Meddelanden frdn Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum, 163-202.
ARF = Annales Regni Francomm.
Armes Prydein. The Prophecy of Britain. From the Book of Taliesin. 1972. (Ed.
Williams, I. and Bromwich, R.)
Arwidsson, G. (ed.). 1984. Birka 11:1. Systematische Analysen der Grdberfunde.
Ashdown, M. 1930. English and Norse Documents relating to the reign ofEthelred
the Unready.
Askeberg, F. 1944. 'La Guerche. Ett bidrag till Loirevikingarnas historia', Namn
och Bygd 32, 176-203.
Asser = Asser, Life of King Alfred.
Asser. 1904. Life of King Alfred. (Ed. Stevenson, W. H.)
Asser. 1983. Life of King/Elfred. In Keynes, S. and Lapidge, M. (eds.). 1983, 66110.
Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1982. 'Fieldwalking in East Brittany, 1982', Cambridge
Medieval Celtic Studies 4, 19-31.
Astill, G. and Davies, W. 1985. "The East Brittany Survey: Oust-Vilaine Water­
shed'. In Macready, S. and Thompson, F. H. (eds.). 1985, 101-10.
Audin, P. 1987. 'La Touraine, du Ve au IXe siecle: 25 ans de publications'. In
Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987a, 111-22.
AV = Annales Vedastini.
AY = Archaeology of York.
Bardel, A. 1985. 'Lande~vennec, L'Abbaye', Archeologie Medievale 15, 241.
Bardel, A. 1986. 'Land6vennec, L'Abbaye', Archeologie Medievale 16, 188-9.
Bardel, A. 1987. 'Land6vennec', Archeologie Medievale 17, 201-2.
Bardel, A., Barral i Altet, X. and Caziot, I. 1984. 'L'abbaye me'dievale deLandevennec', Archeologia 192-3, 76-84.
Barley, M. W. (ed.). 1977. European Towns: their archaeology and early history.
Barral i Altet, X. 1984. 'Nantes a I'e'poque me'rovingienne: Stat des questions', Vie
Journees Nationales d'Archeologie Merovingienne: Bulletin de Liaison 8, 68-73.
Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987a. Bretagne, Pays de Loire, Touraine, Poitou a I'epoqueMerovingienne.
Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987b. Le Paysage Monumental de la France autour de
Van mil.
Bates, D. 1982. Normandy before 1066.
Bekker-Nielsen, H., Foote, P. and Olsen, O. (eds.). 1981. Proceedings of theEighth Viking Congress.
Bendixen, K. 1974. 'The First Merovingian Coin Treasures from Denmark', Medieval Scandinavia 7, 85-101.
Bernier, G. 1982. Les chretientes bretonnes continentales depuis les origines jusqu'au
IXeme siecle.
Bersu, G. and Wilson, D. M. 1966. Three Viking Graves in the Isle of Man.
Bill = Bili, Vie de Saint-Malo, eveque d'Alet.
Bili. 1979. Vie de Saint-Malo, eveque d'Alet. (Ed. le Due, G.) Dossiers du Centre
Regional Archeologique d'Alet Nume'ros Speciaux B.
Blackburn, M. (ed.). 1986. Anglo-Saxon Monetary History: essays in memory of
R. H. M. Dolley.
Boon, G. C. 1986. Welsh Hoards 1979-1981.
Braat, W. C. 1954. 'Les Vikings au Pays de Frise', Annales de Normandie 4, 21927.

The Vikings in Brittany

107/425

Bradley, J. (ed.). 1984. Viking Dublin Exposed.
Braunfels, W. (ed.). 1967. Karl der Grosse: Lebenswerk und Nachleben.
Breese, L. W. 1977. 'The persistence of Scandinavian connections in Normandy inthe tenth and early eleventh centuries', Viator 8, 47-61.
Brennu-Njdls saga. 1954. (Ed. Einar 6l. Sveinsson.) fslenzk fornrit XII.
Br0ndsted, J. 1965. The Vikings.
Brooks, N. 1979. 'England in the Ninth Century: the Crucible of Defeat', Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 1-20.
Brooks, N. P. and Graham-Campbell, J. A. 1986. 'Reflections on the Viking-Age
silver hoard from Croydon, Surrey'. In Blackburn, M. (ed.). 1986, 91-110.
Byrne, F. J. 1973. Irish Kings and High-Kings.
Callmer, J. 1977. Trade beads and bead trade in Scandinavia ca. 800-1000 A.D.
Cartulaire de I'Abbaye de Redon. 1863. (Ed. de Courson, A.)
Cartulaire de I'Abbaye de Saint-Benin. 1841. (Ed. Guerard, B. E. C.)
Chedeville, A. and Guillotel, H. 1984. La Bretagne des saints et des rois Ve-Xe
siecle.
Chedeville, A. and Tonnere, N-Y. 1987. La Bretagne feodale Xle-Xllle siecle.
Christopherson, A. 1981-2. 'Drengs, Thegns, Landmen and Kings', Meddelanden
fran Lunds Universitets Historiska Museum 4, 115-34.
La Chronique de Nantes, 570 environ - 1049. 1896. (Ed. Merlet, R.)
Clancy, J. P. 1970. The Earliest Welsh Poetry.
Clarke, H. B. and Simms, A. (eds.). 1985. The Comparative History of Urban
Origins in non-Roman Europe.
Cleac'h, G. and Letissier, M. 1976. 'Un ermitage de style irlandais en Bretagne:
1'ermitage de Saint-Herv6-en-Lanrivoare', Archeologia 97, 37-41.
CN = La Chronique de Nantes.
CR = Cartulaire de I'abbaye de Redon.
Crawford, B. E. 1987. Scandinavian Scotland.
Davies, W. 1981. 'On the distribution of political power in Brittany in the midninth century'. In Gibson, M. and Nelson, J. (eds.). 1981, 87-107.
Davies, W. 1982a. Wales in the Early Middle Ages.
Davies, W. 1982b. The Latin Charter-Tradition in Western Britain, Brittany and
Ireland in the Early Medieval Period'. In Whitelock, D., McKitterick, R. andDumville, D. (eds.). 1982, 258-80.
Davies, W. 1983. 'Priests and Rural Communities in East Brittany in the Ninth
Century', Etudes Celtiques 20, 177-97.
Davies, W. 1988. Small Worlds: the village community in early medieval Brittany.
Davis, R. H. C. 1976. The Normans and their Myth.
de Boiiard, M. 1953. 'La Hague, camp retranche des Vikings?', Annales deNormandie 3, 3-14.
de Bouard, M. 1955. 'De la Neustrie Carolingienne a la Normandie Fdodale:
Continuite ou Discontinuite?', Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research 28,
1-14.
de Bouard, M. 1963. 'Decouverts Archeologiques', Annales de Normandie 13,
146-8.
de Bouard, M. 1964a. 'Sepultures 6nigmatiques a ReVille', Annales de Normandie
14, 258-63.
de Bouard, M. 1964b. 'A propos de la datation du Hague-Dike, Annales deNormandie 14, 270-1.
de Bouard, M. 1984. Guillaume le Conquerant.
de Bouard, M. and Fournier, G. 1977. 'Country and regional surveys of France'.
In Barley, M. W. (ed.). 1977, 169-83.

108/426

Saga-Bookde la Borderie, A. 1898. Histoire de Bretagne 2.
de la Motte-Collas, M. 1957. 'Les possessions territoriales de 1'abbaye de SaintGermain-des-Pre's, du d6but de IXe au debut du Xlle siecle', Revue de I'Histoirede I'Eglise de France 43, 65-80.
de Paor, L. 1976. The Viking Towns of Ireland'. In Almqvist, B. and Greene, D.
(eds.) 1976.
d'Haenens, A. 1967. Les Invasions Normandes en Belgique au IXe siecle.
d'Haenens, A. 1969. 'Les invasions Normandes dans 1'empire franc au IXe siecle',
Settimane di Studio del Centra Italiano di studi sull'Alto Medioevo 16, 233-98.
Dolley, M. 1978. 'The Anglo-Danish and Anglo-Norse coinages of York'. In Hall,
R. A. (ed.). 1978, 26-31.
Dolley, M. and Yvon, J. 1971. 'A group of tenth-century coins found at MontSaint-Michel', British Numismatic Journal 40, 1-16.
Douglas, D. 1942. 'Rollo of Normandy', English Historical Review 57, 417-36.
Douglas, D. 1947. 'The Rise of Normandy', Proceedings of the British Academy
33, 101-30.
Douglas, D. 1958. 'Lesevfiques de Normandie (1035-1066)', Annales deNormandie
8, 87-102.
Dronke, U., Gudrun P. Helgadbttir, Weber, G. W. and Bekker-Nielsen, H. (eds.).
1981. Specvlvm Norroenvm. Norse studies in memory of Gabriel Turvitte-Petre.
du Chatellier, P. and le Pontois, L. 1908-9. 'A ship-burial in Brittany', Saga-Book6, 123-61.
Dudo of Saint-Quentin. 1841. Historia Normannorum. In MGHSS 4, 16, 93-106.
(Ed. Waitz, D. G.)
Dumville, D. N. 1983. 'Brittany and Armes Prydein Vawr', Etudes Celtiques 20,
145-59.
Earle, J. and Plummer, C. (eds.). 1899. Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel,
Egils Saga. 1975. (Tr. Fell, C.)
Egils saga Skalla-Grimssonar. 1933. (Ed. Sigurdur Nordal.) Islenzk fornrit II.
Elmqvist, B. 1966-8. 'Les Fibules de Pitres', Meddelanden fr&n Lunds Universitets
Historiska Museum, 203-24.
Ermentarius = Ermentarius, Miracula S. Filiberti.
Ermentarius. 1887. Miracula S. Filiberti. In MGHSS 15, 1, 25, 297-303. (Ed.
Holder-Egger, O.)
Farrell, R. (ed.). 1982. The Vikings.
Fell, C. 1980. 'From Odin to Christ'. In Graham-Campbell, J. A. (ed.). 1980,17294.
Fell, C. 1981. 'Vikingarvisur'. In Dronke, U., Gudrun P. Helgadottir, Weber, G.
W. and Bekker-Nielsen, H. (eds.). 1981, 106-22.
Fellows-Jensen, G. 1988. 'Scandinavian place-names and Viking settlement in
Normandy: a review', Namn och Bygd 76, 113-37.
Fichet de Clairefontaine, F. 1986. 'Corseul, Salle des Fetes', ArcheologieMedievale
16, 235-6.
Fleuriot, L. 1976. 'Old Breton Genealogies and Early British Traditions', Bulletinof the Board of Celtic Studies 26, 1-6.
Flodoard Ann. = Flodoard, Annales.
Flodoard HRE = Flodoard, Historia Remensis Ecclesiae.
Flodoard. 1839. Annales. In MGHSS 3, 39, 363-407. (Ed. Pertz, G. H.)
Flodoard. 1881. Historia Remensis Ecclesiae. In MGHSS 13, 52. (Ed. Heller, I.
and Waitz, G.)
Florin, B. 1985. 'L'habitat au haul Moyen Age dans le Nord-Pas-de-Calais'. In
Pe'rin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 363-9.

The Vikings in Brittany

109/427

Fontaine, J. 1985. 'La creation litte'raire: prosateurs et poetes'. In P6rin, P. andFeffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 279-87.
Foote, P. G. and Wilson, D. M. 1970. The Viking Achievement.
Friell, J. G. P. and Watson, W. G. (eds.). 1984. Pictish Studies. Settlement, Burialand Art in Dark Age Northern Britain.
Galinid, H. 1978. 'Arche'ologie et Topographic Historique de Tours: IVeme-XIeme
siecle', Zeitschrift fur Archaologie des Mittelalters 6, 33-56.
Gasnault, P. 1961. 'Le tombeau de Saint Martin et les invasions normandes dans
1'histoire et dans la 16gende', Revue d'Histoire de 1'Eglise de France 47, 51-66.
Gesta Conwoionis Abbatis Rotonensis. 1887. In MGHSS 15, 1, 42, 455-9. (Ed. deHeinemann, L.)
Gibson, M. and Nelson, J. (eds.). 1981. Charles the Bald: Court and Kingdom.
Giot, P-R. 1975. 'Saint-Saturnin-en-Plomeur', Archeologie Medievale 5, 514-15.
Giot, P-R. 1976. 'Saint-Saturnin-en-Plomeur', Archeologie Medievale 6, 370-71.
Giot, P-R. 1983. 'Brehat, He Lavret', Archeologie Medievale 13, 260-61.
Giot, P-R. 1984. 'Brehat, He Lavret', Archeologie Medievale 14, 313.
Giot, P-R. 1985. 'Brdhat, He Lavret', Archeologie Medievale 15, 233.
Giot, P-R. 1987. 'L'&ablissement et la cimetiere de 1'Ile Lavret pres Brfihat'. In
Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987a, 61-72.
Giot, P-R. and Monnier, J. L. 1978. 'Les oratoires des anciens bretons de SaintUrnel ou Saint-Saturnin-en-Plomeur (Finistere)', Archeologie Medievale 8, 5593.
Gougaud, L. 1919-21. 'Les mentions anglaises des saints bretons et de leurs
reliques', Annales de Bretagne 34, 272-7.
Graham-Campbell, J. A. (ed.). 1980. The Viking World.
Graham-Campbell. J. A. 1984. 'Western influences on penannular brooches andringed pins'. In Arwidsson, G. (ed.). 1984, 31-8.
Graham-Campbell, J. A. 1987. 'Western penannular brooches and their Viking
Age copies in Norway: a new classification'. In Knirk, J. (ed.). 1987, 231-46.
Gregory of Tours. 1884. Historia Francorum. In MGHSSRM 1, 1. (Eds. Arndt,
W. and Krusch, B.)
Groenman-van Waateringe, W. and van Wijngaarden-Bakker, L. H. (eds.). 1987.
Farm Life in a Carolingian Village.
Guigon, P. 1984. 'L'arche'ologie mdrovingienne en soutane a Nantes: 1'abbe Abel
Cahour (1812-1902) et le chanoine Georges Durville (1853-1943)', VleJournees
Nationales d'Archeologie Merovingienne: Bulletin de Liaison 8, 36-8.
Guigon, P. 1986. 'Lanmeur, Crypte de I'^glise paroissiale', Archeologie Medievale

16, 189-90.
Guigon, P. 1987a. 'Les fortifications'. In Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987b, 227-9.
Guigon, P. 1987b. 'Locronan, Goarum ar Salud', Archeologie Medievale 17, 2434.
Guigon,'P., Bardel, A. and Batt, M. 1987. 'Nicropoles et Sarcophages du Haul
Moyen Age en Bretagne', Revue d'archeologie de I'Ouest 4, 133-48.
Guillotel, H. 1979. 'Les deques d'Alet de IXe siecle au milieu du Xlle siecle',
Annales de la Societe d'Histoire et d'Archeologie de I'Arrondissement de Saint-

Malo, 251-66.
Guillotel, H. 1982. 'L'exode de clergd Breton devant les invasions Scandinaves'.
Memoires de la Societe d'histoire et d'archeologie de Bretagne 59, 269-315.
Guinet, L. 1980. 'Les toponymes normands "torp(s)", "torpt", "tourp(s)","tour(s)"', Annales de Normandie 30, 193-7.

110/428

Saga-Book

Haevernick, T. E. 1963. 'Beitrage zur Geschichte des antiken Glases', Jahrbuch

des Romisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 10, 118-38.
Halbout, P. and le Maho, J. 1984. Aspects de la construction de bois en Normandie

du ler siecle au XlVe siecle.
Hall, A. R., Kenward, H. K., Williams, D. and Greig, J. R. A. 1983. Environmentand Living Conditions at Two Anglo-Scandinavian Sites. AY 14/4.
Hall, R. A. (ed.). 1978. Viking Age York and the North.
Hall, R. A. 1981. 'Markets of the Danelaw'. In Roesdahl, E., Graham-Campbell,
J. A., Connor, P. and Pearson, K. (eds.). 1981, 95-141.
Hall, R. A. 1984. The Viking Dig.
Hallfredr vandredaskald. 1930. Oldfsdrdpa. In Ashdown, M. 1930, 126-35.
Hamel-Siraon, J-Y., Langouet, L., Nourry-Denayer, F. and Mouton, D. 1979.
'Fouille d'un retranchement d'Alain Barbetorte datable de 939. Le Camp desHaies a Trans (Ille et Vilaine)', Les Dossiers du Centre Regional Archeologiqued'Alet 7, 47-74.
Hamilton, J. R. C. 1956. Excavations at Jarlshof, Shetland.
Henry, P. 1983. 'Pledeliac, Chateau de la Hunaudaye', Archeologie Medievale 13,
312-14.
Hill, D. 1981. An Atlas of Anglo-Saxon England.
Hodges, R. 1981a. Trade and market origins in the ninth century: an archaeologicalperspective of Anglo-Carolingian relations'. In Gibson, M. and Nelson, J. (eds.).

1981, 213-33.
Hodges, R. 1981b. The Hamwih pottery: the local and imported wares from 30
years' excavations in Middle Saxon Southampton and their European context.
Hodges, R. 1982. Dark Age Economics. The Origins of Towns and Trade A.D.
600-1000.
Holdsworth, J. 1978. Selected pottery groups A.D. 650-1780. AY 16/1.
Hugh of Fleury = Hugh of Fleury, Actus Modernorum Regum Francorum.
Hugh of Fleury. 1851. Actus Modernorum Regum Francorum. In MGHSS 9, 6,

376-95. (Ed. Pertz, G.)
Irien, J. 1976. 'Camp, motte et chapelles de Lezkelen-en-Plabennec', Archeologia
97, 19-27.
Irien, J. 1982. 'Plabennec', Archeologie Medievale 12, 313.
Jomsvikinga saga. 1969. (Ed. C"lafur Hallddrsson.)
Jones, M. 1981. 'The defence of medieval Brittany: a survey of the establishmentof fortified towns, castles and frontiers from the Gallo-Roman period to the endof the Middle Ages', Archaeological Journal 138, 149-204.
Keynes, S. and Lapidge, M. (eds.). 1983. Alfred the Great.
Knirk, J. (ed.). 1987. Proceedings of the Tenth Viking Congress.
Labande, E. R. (ed.). 1974. Melanges.
Laing, L. 1975. The Archaeology of Late Celtic Britain and Ireland c. 400-1200
A.D.
Lang, J. 1978. 'Anglo-Scandinavian Sculpture in Yorkshire'. In Hall, R. A. (ed.).
1978, 11-20.
Lang, J, 1984. 'The Hogback: A Viking Colonial Monument', Anglo-Saxon Studies

in Archaeology and History 3, 83-176.
Lang, J. 1988. Viking-Age Decorated Wood. MDE B, 1.
Langouet, L. 1976. 'Saint-Malo', Archeologie Medievale 6, 342.
Langouet, L. 1979. 'Saint-Malo', Archeologie Medievale 9, 162-3.
Lanos, P. 1983. 'Guipel', Archeologie Medievale 13, 341-2.
Lauer, P. (ed.). 1940-49. Recueil des actes de Charles 111 le Simple, roi de France
893-923.

The Vikings in Brittany

111/429le Maho, J. 1980. 'Chateaux de l'6poque Franque en Normandie', Archeologie
Medievale 10, 153-66.
le Patourel, J. H. 1944. 'Geoffrey of Montbray, Bishop of Coutances, 1049-93',
English Historical Review 59, 129-61.
Libellus Miraculorum S. Bertini. 1887. In MGHSS 15, 1, 47, 509-16. (Ed. HolderEgger, O.)
Lorren, C. 1985. 'Le village de Saint-Martin de Mondeville, de 1'antiquite au Haul
Moyen Age'. In Perin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 351-63.
Lot, F. 1899. 'Date de 1'exode des saints hors de la Bretagne', Annales de Bretagne
15, 60-76.
Loth, J. 1890. Chrestomathie Bretonne (Armoricain, Gallois, Cornique). lerepartie: Breton-armoricain.
Loyn, H. R. 1976. The Vikings in Wales.
Loyn, H. R. 1977. The Vikings in Britain.
Mabille, E. 1868. 'Les invasions normandes dans la Loire et les peregrinations ducorps de Saint-Martin', Bibliotheque de I'ecole de Chartres 30, 145-94.
MacGregor, A. 1978. 'Industry and Commerce in Anglo-Scandinavian York'. In
Hall, R. A. (ed.). 1978, 37-58.
MacGregor, A. 1982. Anglo-Scandinavian Finds from Lloyd's Bank, Pavement
and other sites. AY 17/3.
MacNiocaill, G. 1975. The Medieval Irish Annals.
MacReady, S. and Thompson, F. H. (eds.). 1985. Archeological Field Survey in
Britain and Abroad.
Magnuss saga lengri. 1965. In Orkneyinga saga 1965, 333-83.
Magnuss saga skemmri. 1965. In Orkneyinga saga 1965, 309-32.
McGrail, S. 1980. 'Ships, Shipwrights and Seamen'. In Graham-Campbell, J. A.
(ed.). 1980, 36-63.
McKitterick, R. 1983. The Prankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians 751-987.
McTurk, R. W. 1976. 'Ragnarr Loobrok in the Irish Annals?' In Almqvist, B. andGreene, D. (eds.). 1976, 93-123.
MDE = Medieval Dublin Excavations 1962-81.
Meirion-Jones, G. I. 1982. The vernacular architecture of Brittany.
Merlet, F. 1930. 'La restauration du diocese de Treguier apres les invasions
normandes', Memoires de I'association bretonne 41, 84-94.
Metzenthin, E. M. 1941. Die Lander- und Volkernamen im altislandischen
Schrifttum.
MGH= Monumenta Germaniae Historica:
Capit= Capitularia Regum Francorum, Legum Sectio ii
SS= Scriptores
SSRG = Scriptores Rerum Germanicarum in usum scholarum
SSRM = Scriptores Rerum Merovingicarum
Mitchell, G. F. 1987. Archaeology and Environment in Early Dublin. MDE C, 1.
Morey, C. R., Rand, E. K. and Kraeling, C. H. 1931. 'The Gospel book ofLandevennec in the New York Public Library', Art Studies 8, 225-86.
Moulden, J. and Tweddle, D. 1986. Anglo-Scandinavian Settlement South-West of
the Ouse. AY 8/1.
Muller-Wille, M. 1978. 'Das Schiffsgrab von der He de Groix (Bretagne): Ein
Exkurs zum Bootkammergrab von Haithabu', Berichte fiber die Ausgrabungenin Haithabu 12, 48-84.
Murray, H. 1981. 'Houses and other structures from the Dublin Excavations 19621976'. In Bekker-Nielsen, H., Foote, P. and Olsen, O. (eds.). 1981, 57-69.

112/430

Saga-Book

Mussel, L. 1954a. 'Les relations extlrieures de la Normandie de IXme au Xlmesiecle, d'apres quelques trouvailles numeraires re'centes', Annales de Normandie
4, 31-8.
Mussel, L. 1954b. 'La satiriste Gamier de Rouen et son milieu', Revue du Moyen
Age Latin 10, 237-58.
Musset, L. 1965. Les invasions: le second assaut contre I'Europe Chrftienne.
Musset, L. 1974. 'La renaissance urbaine des Xeme et Xleme siecles dans 1'ouest
de la France; problemes et hypotheses de travail'. In Labande, E. R. (ed.). 1974,
563-75.
Musset, L. 1975a. The Germanic Invasions: the making of Europe A.D. 400-600.
Musset, L. 1975b. 'Pour I'e'tude comparative de deux fondations politiques desVikings: le Royaume d'York et le Duchg de Rouen', Northern History 10, 4054.
Musset, L. 1978. 'Participation de Vikings venus des pays Celtes a la colonisation
Scandinave de la Normandie', Cahiers du Centre de Recherches sur les Pays du
Nord et de la Nord-Ouest 1, 107-17.
Musset, L. 1985. 'De la Neustrie Carolingienne au Duch£ de Normandie'. In Pe'rin,
P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 425-31.
Musset, L., Bouvris, J-M. and Maillefer, J-M. 1985. Autour du pouvoir ducal
normand Xe-XIIe siecles.
Mutherich, F. 1985. 'L'enluminure en Neustrie'. In Pfirin, P. and Feffer, L-C.
(eds.). 1985, 257-75.
Nelson, J. 1981. 'The Annals of St. Benin'. In Gibson, M. and Nelson, J. (eds.).
1981, 15-36.
Nicolardot, J-P. 1984. Camp de Peran, Pledran (Cotes du Nord). Rapport scientifique des fouilles executfes en 1983.
Nicolardot, J-P. 1985. 'Ptedran, Camp de P6ran', Archeologie Medievale 15, 281.
Nicolardot, J-P. 1986. 'Ptedran, Camp de Peran', Archeologie MedUvale 16, 224.
Nicolardot, J-P. 1987. 'Elements de datation du Camp de Pe>an, Ptedran (Cdtes
du Nord)'. In Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987a, 73-8.
Nicolardot, J-P., Nissen-Jaubert, A. and Wimmers, W. H. 1987. TOdran (C6tes
du Nord), Camp de P6ran'. In Barral i Altet, X. (ed.). 1987b, 229-31.
Nicolle, D. 1984. The Age of Charlemagne.
Nicolle, D. 1987. The Normans.
Njal's Saga. 1960. (Tr. Magnusson, M. and Palsson, H.)
O'Brien, M. A. 1976. Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae I.
C- Corrain, D. 1972. Ireland before the Normans.
6 Coniin, D. 1977-8. 'High-kings, Vikings and other kings', Irish Historical
Studies 21, 283-323.
Oheix, A. 1905. 'Les reliques bretonnes de Montreuil-sur-Mer', Bulletinarcheologique de I'association bretonne 24, 139-73.
Olson, B. L. and Padel, O. 1986. 'A Tenth-Century List of Cornish Parochial
Saints', Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 12, 33-72.
6 Rfordain, B. 1971. 'Excavations at High Street and Winetavem Street', Medieval
Archaeology 15, 73-86.
6 Rfordain, B. 1976. 'The High Street Excavations'. In Almqvist, B. and Greene,
D. (eds.) 1976, 135-41.
Orkneyinga saga. 1965. (Ed. Finnbogi Gudmundsson.) fslenzk fornrit XXXIV.
Orkneyinga saga. 1978. (Tr. Palsson, H. and Edwards, P.)
Page, R. I. 1984-5. Review of Farrell, R. (ed.) 1982. In Saga-Book 21, 308-11.
Pe'rin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985. La Neustrie: les pays au nord de la Loirede Dagobert a Charles le Chauve (Vlle-IXe siecle).

The Vikings in Brittany

113/431Petersen, J. 1919. De norske vikingesverd. En typologisk-kronologisk studie overvikingetidens vaaben. Skrifter utgitt av Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiania, Hist.fil. Klasse. no. 1.
Pine, E. J. E. 1986. Post-Roman coins from York Excavations 1971-81. AY 18/1.
Poulin, J-C. 1977. 'Hagiographie et Politique. La premiere vie de Saint Samson de
Dol', Francia 5, 1-26.
Poulin, J-C. 1978. 'A propos du diocese de Dol: Saint Samson et la question desenclaves', Francia 6, 610-15.
Price, N. S. The Vikings in Brittany. Unpublished BA dissertation, University
College London (1988).
Price, N. S. 'Viking mercenary fleets and the Great Army of Danes: some problemsof logistics and supplies'. Forthcoming.
Privat, E. (ed.). 1971. Documents de I'Histoire de la Bretagne.
Quentel, P. 1962. 'La Guerche. Les Vikings et la Bretagne', Mimoires de la Societed'histoire et d'archeologie de Bretagne 42.
Radley, J. 1971. 'Economic Aspects of Anglo-Danish York', Medieval Archaeology
15, 37-58.
Ralston, I. and Inglis, J. 1984. Foul Hordes: the Picts in the North-East and their
Background.
Regino = Regino of Prurn, Chronicon.
Regino of Priim. 1890. Chronicon. In MGHSSRG 50. (Ed. Kurze, F.)
Regino of Priim. Chronicon. (Tr. Nelson, J. L.) Unpublished.
Renoux, A. 1975. 'Recherches historiques et arche'ologiques sur le chateau deFecamp, ancien palais des dues de Normandie', Chateau Gaillard 7, 183-201.
Renoux, A. 1979. 'Le chateau des Dues de Normandie i Fdcamp (Xe-XIIe siecles):quelques donn6es arche'ologiques et topographiques', Archeologie Medievale 9,
5-36.
Renoux, A. 1985. 'La vie quotidienne a Feeamp, il I'e'poque des moniales carolingiennes'. In Perin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 411-23.
Renoux, A. 1987. Le Palais Ducal de Fecamp: ses antecedents etsesprolongements.
Riche, P. 1969. 'Consequences des invasions normandes sur la culture monastiquedans 1'occident franc', Settimane di Studio del Centra Italiano di studi sull 'Alto
Medioevo 16, 705-21.
Riche, P. 1976. 'Translation de reliques a l'6poque carolingienne: histoire desreliques de Saint-Malo", Le Moyen Age 4th series 31, 201-18.
Riche", P. 1985. 'Education et culture'. In Perin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985,
275-9.
Richer of Rheims = Richer of Rheims, Historice.
Richer of Rheims. 1839. Historiarum Libri iv, 884-995. In MGHSS 3, 42, 561-657.
(Ed. Pertz, G. H.)
Roberts, B. F. 1976. 'Geoffrey of Monmouth and Welsh Historical Tradition',
Nottingham Medieval Studies 20, 29-40.
Roesdahl, E. 1982. Viking Age Denmark.
Roesdahl, E., Graham-Campbell, J. A., Connor, P. and Pearson, K. (eds.). 1981.
The Vikings in England.
Rollason, D. W. 1978. 'Lists of saints' resting places in Anglo-Saxon England',
Anglo-Saxon England 7, 61-93.
Sanquer, R. 1976. 'Naissance de Parcheologie medievale en Bretagne', Archeologia
97, 14-18.
Sawyer, P. H. 1971. The Age of the Vikings.
Sawyer, P. H. 1978. 'Some sources for the history of Viking Northumbria'. In Hall,
R. A. (ed.). 1978, 3-7.

114/432

Saga-Book

Sawyer, P. H. 1982a. Kings and Vikings.
Sawyer, P. H. 1982b. "The Vikings and Ireland'. In Whitelock, D., McKitterick,R. and Dumville, D. (eds.). 1982, 345-61.
Searle, E. 1984. 'Fact and Pattern in Heroic History. Dudo of Saint-Quentin',
Viator 15, 119-37.
Sighvatr Pordarson. 1981. Vikingarvisur. In Fell, C. 1981, 110-22.
Small, A. (ed.) 1987. The Pica: A New Look at Old Problems.
Smith, J. M. H. 1982. 'The "archbishopric" of Dol and the ecclesiastical politics
of ninth-century Brittany', Studies in Church History 18, 59-70.
Smith, J. M. H. Carolingian Brittany. Unpublished PhD thesis, Oxford (1985).
Smith, J. M. H. 1986. 'The Sack of Vannes by Pippin III", Cambridge Medieval
Celtic Studies 11, 17-29.
Smyth, A. P. 1975 and 1979. Scandinavian York and Dublin 1-2.
Smyth, A. P. 1977. Scandinavian Kings in the British Isles 850-880.
Smyth, A. P. 1978. 'The chronology of Northumbrian history in the ninth and tenthcenturies'. In Hall, R. A. (ed.). 1978, 8-10.
Smyth, A. P. 1984. Warlords and Holy Men.
Snorri Sturluson. 1941-51. Heimskringla. (Ed. Bjarni Adalbjarnarson.) fslenzk
fornrit XXVI-XXVIII.
Snorri Sturluson. 1961-4. Heimskringla. Part 1. The Olaf Sagas 1-2. Part 2. Sagasof the Norse Kings. (Tr. Laing, S.)
Stenton, F. M. 1945. 'The Scandinavian Colonies in England and Normandy',
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 27, 1-12.
Stenton, F. M. 1961. The First Century of English Feudalism.
Stenton, F. M. 1971. Anglo-Saxon England.
Trimpe Burger, J. A. 1973. 'Oost Souburg, Province of Zeeland: a Preliminary
Report on the Excavation of the Site of an Ancient Fortress', Berichten van de
Rijksdienst voor Het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek23, 355-65.
Triste, A. 1985. 'Vannes, Meudon', Archeologie Medievale 15, 304.
Triste, A. 1986. 'Vannes, Meudon', Archeologie Medievale 16, 247-8.
Triste, A. 1987. 'Vannes, Meudon', Archeologie Medievale 17, 276-7.
Tweddle, D. 1986. Finds from Parliament Street and other Sites in the City Centre.
AY 17/4.
Uurmonoc = Uurmonoc, Vie de Saint Paul de Lean en Bretagne.
Uurmonoc. 1881-3. 'Vie de Saint Paul de L6on en Bretagne', Revue Celtique 5,
413-60. (Ed. Cuissard, C.)
Verbruggen, J. F. 1967. 'L'arme'e et la strategic de Charlemagne'. In Braunfels,W. (ed.). 1967, 420-37.
Verhulst, A. 1985. 'Villes et vie urbaine'. In P6rin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.).
1985, 333-47.
Vezin, J. 1985. 'Les scriptoria'. In P6rin, P. and Feffer, L-C. (eds.). 1985, 243-57.
Wakelin, M. F. 1976-7. 'Norse Influence in Cornwall: a Survey of the Evidence',
Journal of the Institute of Cornish Studies 4/5, 41-50.
Wallace, P. F. 1985. 'The Archaeology of Viking Dublin'. In Clarke, H. B. andSimms, A. (eds.). 1985, 103-45.
Wallace, P. F. 1986. 'The English Presence in Viking Dublin'. In Blackburn, M.
(ed.). 1986, 201-21.
Wallace, P. F. (ed.). 1988a. Miscellanea I. MDE B, 2.
Wallace, P. F. 1988b. 'Dublin 840-1300: An Archaeological Bibliography'. In
Wallace, P. F. (ed.). 1988a, 1-6.

The Vikings in Brittany

115/433

Wallace, P. F. 1988c. Aspects of Viking Dublin 1-6.
Wallace, P. F. and 6 Floinn, R. 1988. Dublin 1000. Discovery and Excavation in
Dublin 1842-1981.
Wallace-Hadrill, J. M. 1967. 'Charlemagne and England'. In Braunfels, W. (ed.).
1967, 683-99.
Wallace-Hadrill, J. M. (ed.). 1975a. Early Medieval History.
Wallace-Hadrill, J. M. 1975b. 'The Vikings in Francia'. In Wallace-Hadrill, J. M.
(ed.). 1975a, 217-36.
Wamers, E. 1985. Insularer Metallschmuck in wikingerzeitlichen Grabern Nordeuropas.
Werner, K-F. 1985. 'Arme~es et guerres en Neustrie'. In Pdrin, P. and Feffer, L-C.
(eds.). 1985, 49-57.
Whitelock, D. (ed.). 1979. English Historical Documents c. 500-1042. English
Historical Documents I.
Whitelock, D., McKitterick, R. and Dumville, D. (eds.). 1982. Ireland in Early
Medieval Europe.
William of Malmesbury — William of Malmesbury, Gesta Pontificum Anglorum.
William of Malmesbury, 1870. Gesta Pontificum Anglorum. (Ed. Hamilton, N. E.
S. A.) Rolls Series 52.
Wilson, D. M. 1985. The Bayeux Tapestry.
Wormald, F. 1977. An Early Breton Gospel Book.
Wulfstan. Sermo Lupi ad Anglos. Tr. in Whitelock, D. (ed.). 1979, 928-34.
Yver, J. 1969. 'Les premieres institutions du duchl de Normandie', Settimane deStudio del Centra Italiano de studi sull'Alto Medioevo 16, 299-366.
Zadora-Rio, E. 1974. 'L'enceinte fortifie'e du Plessis Grimoult (Calvados). Contri­
bution a I'dtude historique et arch£ologique de 1'habitat seigneurial au Xle
siecle', Archeohgie Medievale 3-4, 111-243.

INDEX

Page numbers given in italics refer to illustrations.
Aachen, 15
Abbot of Saint-Denis, 29
Actard, Bishop of Nantes, 32
Adalhard, Carolingian commander, 28
jElfred, King of England, 47, 61/Ethelstan, King of England, 19,41,43,
46, 49, 88, 92/Ethelwulf of Wessex, 29
Aigrold (Haraldr Gormsson?), Viking
commander, 52, 53, 103
Aimoin, chronicler, 44
Aiquin, Viking commander, 61
Alain of Broweroch, 36
Alain I 'the Great' (Alain of Vannes),
Duke of Brittany, 34,36-7,39,42,489, 61, 102
Alain II 'Barbetorte' (Alain TwistedBeard), Duke of Brittany, 21, 42, 44,
46-8, 48, 51-2,54,56,58,62-4,77,989, 102
Alain III, Duke of Brittany, 53
Alain Twisted-Beard, see Alain II 'Bar­
betorte'Alain of Vannes, see Alain I 'the Great'
Alan of Richmond, 54
Alemannia, 11
Alet, monastery of, 10, 34, 40, 41, 104
Alfred of Lincoln, 54
Alsace, 11
Amiens, 29, 31
Angers, 17, 31, 34, 35
Anglesey, 90
Anglians, 88
Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, 18-19, 37, 42,86
Anglo-Saxons, 18-19, 29, 49, 85, 87-91
Anglo-Scandinavians, 88, 91
Anjou, 11, 25, 32, 34, 35, 40, 51-2, 54,
63-4
Annales Bertiniani, 15, 17, 23-32, 34,
38, 42
Annales Cambriae, 19
Annales Engolismenses, 17, 23, 25
Annales of Flodoard, 16, 42, 44-8, 56
Annales Fuldenses, 17, 23-4, 26-7, 35-7
Annales Regni Francorum, 14-15, 21-2
Annales Vedastini, 17, 37
Annales Xantenses, 17
Annals of Saint-Florent, 26

Aquitaine, 9, 11, 22-4, 28-9, 32,33, 42,
44, 45
Armes Prydein, 19, 49, 90
Arnulf, King of the Franks, 37
Arzon, monastery of, 41
Asser, Bishop, 18, 47
Audulf, Carolingian general, 21
Augier, Count, 28
Austrasia, //Auvergne, the, 44
Auvers, 32
Avessac, 34
Avranches, monastery of, 35, 41
Avrenchin, the, 46
Baldwin II of Flanders, 35
Balladoole, 65
Ballateare, 65
Ballon, Battle of, 24
Basse-Indre, monastery of, 41
Batavia (Batavum), 29
Batz, monastery of, 41
Bayeux, 35, 41, 44, 52, 53
Bayeux Tapestry, 20, 53, 63, 72, 74, 83
Beaubec-la-Rosiere, 83
Beauvais, 26, 29, 30, 44, 45
Belgium, 87
Benedict, St., 25
Be>engar of Rennes, 28, 34, 36
Berry, monastery of, 40
Bessin, the, 25, 44, 82
Beuzit, monastery of, 41
Biece, He de, 26, 27, 55, 75, 95
Bili, chronicler, 16, 34
Birka, 79, 81, 85
Bishop of Vannes, 27
Bjorn inn brezki, 14
Bjorn Ironside, Viking commander, 289, 30, 103
Blavet, river, 62
Blois, 52
Bodmin, 91
Bordeaux, 25, 27, 33
Borre style, 104
Botalec, 62
Boulogne, 86
Bourbriac, monastery of, 41
Bourgogne (Burgundy), 11, 40, 42, 44,
45

The Vikings in Brittany
Brebieres, 83
Brennu-Njals saga, 13
Bretland, 13, 14, 104
Bretons, 10-11, 16, 21-6, 28-9, 32, 33,
34, 35, 36-8, 42-3, 45-8, 48, 49, 51-5,
61-2, 64, 75-6, 79, 82-6, 88-9
Brissarthe, Battle of, 32
Bristol, 90
Bristol Channel, the, 90
Brittany, 9-23, 25-6, 29, 32-4, 36-9, 4255,61-4,71-2,75-9,82-5,87-100,102,104
geography of, 9, 10, 25
Viking raids on, 9-10, 21-7, 31-6, 3840, 42, 44-5, 51-3, 75, 87, 92
Broweroch, county of, 10
Brunanburh, Battle of, 19,49,89-90,92
Burgundy, see Bourgogne
Busalt, monastery of, 41
Camp des Haies, 58, 61, 99
Camp de PcSran, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60,
62, 77, 85, 87, 98
Carolingian Empire, 10, 11, 15, 17, 213, 25, 29, 33, 35-8, 89, 92-3, 102
Carolingian rulers, 14, 23-4, 36, 82, 102(see also by name)
Carolingians (Franks), 22, 24, 28-9, 32,
34-6,38-40, 44, 45, 46, 50-1, 61-2, 64,
75, 81, 83-5, 87-8, 90, 104
Cartulary of the Abbey of Redort, 15,

27, 31-2, 34, 64
Cartulary of Quimperle, 45
Cashel, 92
Castel-Cran en P161auff, 62
Caux, 39
Cavern, river, 62
Celts and Celtic lands, 18-19, 49, 89, 91
Charente, the, 32
Charenton, 32Charlemagne, Emperor, 15, 22, 29, 61
Charles the Bald, Emperor, 23-6, 2835, 38
Charles III 'the Simple', Emperor, 39,
44
Chartres, 29, 52-3
Chartres, Battle of, 39
Chateau-du-Loir, monastery of, 40
Cherbourg, 78
Chester, 90
Chezine, river, 75, 98
Christianity, threat to, 16, 20, 32, 34
Chronicle of Nantes, 15-16, 23, 25, 42,
47-8, 51, 53, 56
Chronicon of Regino of Priim, 17, 32,
34, 36-7

117/435

churches, 10, 20, 22, 25, 28, 30, 33, 38,
40-2, 75-6, 84 (see also by name)clergy, 20,22-3,25-6, 29,34-5,40-2,75,
84
Clermont, 32
Clontarf, Battle of, 53, 92
Conan I of Rennes, 52
Conan II, Duke of Brittany, 20, 53-4
Conwoion, St., 41
Coppergate, Nos. 16-22, excavations at,
88, 104
Corbeil, monastery of, 41
Cork, 92
Cormfiry, monastery of, 26
Cornish language, 45
Cornouaille, county of, 10, 39
Cornwall, 54, 89-91
Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae, 45
Corseul, monastery of, 41, 75
Cotentin, the, 39, 46, 51-2, 53, 79
C6tes-du-Nord, 57, 62, 63, 98
Coucouronne, monastery of, 40
Couesnon, river, 37
Count of Vannes, 22
Coutances, 33
Cunauld, monastery of, 40
Dal Riadans, 105
Danegeld, 24, 29-30, 32, 35, 38, 45, 85
Danelaw, the, 50-1,54,64,78,90-1,104
Danes, 9,15,18,23-7,29-32,36,39,42,
52, 56, 75, 86-7, 90
Denis, St., 29
Denmark, 24, 27, 29, 52-3, 61
Dinan, 20, 63
Dives, river, 39
Dol, 10, 14, 16, 20, 25, 33, 41, 43, 47,
48, 51-2, 53, 54, 56, 63
Domnonde, county of, 10
Dorestad, 23, 26-7, 29, 31
Dorlet, 61
Drogo, Duke of Brittany (as a child),
52
Dublin, 18-19, 50-1, 88, 91-2, 105
Dublin Norse, 19, 89, 91
Dudo of Saint-Quentin, 16-18, 39, 43,
46, 52, 82
East Anglians, 86
East Prankish Kingdom, 11Ecgbryht of Wessex, 90
Egils saga Skalla-Grimssonar, 90
Eirikr b!680x (Erik Bloodaxe), 14, 19,
49, 88, 90
Elbe, river, 22, 24
Elbeuf, 80, 82, 100

118/436

Saga-Book

Eleutherius, St., 29
England, 12, 18, 20, 29-30, 31, 35, 3943, 46-7, 50, 53-4, 86, 89, 92
Eoforwic, 88 (see also York)
Epte, river, 30
Erdre, river, 47, 63
Erik Bloodaxe, see Eirikr b!630x
Erispoe, princeps of Brittany, 23, 26,
27, 29, 34, 75, 102
Ermentarius, chronicler, 17, 23
Eudo of Tattershall, 54
Eure, 100-101
Evrecin, the, 39
Evreux, 35, 80, 82, 100
Exeter, 91
Fecamp, 82-4
Felekan, Viking commander, 45-6, 48,
102, 103, 104
Finistere, 63, 97
Finland, 28
Flanders, 22, 32, 35, 38, 61
Fleury, monastery of, 32, 33, 41
Flodoard, chronicler, 16,18, 35,42, 448, 51, 56, 71, 82
Foss, river, 87
France, He de, 44Francia, 11, 33, 36, 42, 88
Prankish Empire, see Carolingian Em­
pire
Franko-Breton March, 9, 10, 22, 46, 53
Franks, see Carolingians
Frisia, 11, 23-9, 31, 35-6, 87
Frisians, 36
Frotbald, Bishop of Chartres, 29
Fulk the Good of Anjou, 52
Galicia, 24, 33
Gamier of Rouen, 18
Garonne, river, 24, 33
Gascons, 23
Gascony, 11Gaul, 22, 104
Gauzfrid, Carolingian commander, 34
Gesta Conwoionis Abbatis Rotonensis,
17
Gildas, St., 41
Giraldus Cambrensis, 19
Goarum ar Salud, 62
Godafrid, Viking commander, 35-6
Godfred, Viking commander, 26-8, 75,103
Gokstad, 65
Gonet, river, 55
Ggngu-Hrtflfr, see Hrolfr
Gotland, 71, 73

godar, 19
Gozelin, Abbot, 36
Great Army of Danes, 9,18-19, 25, 32,
35, 39, 43, 50, 79, 86-7
Gregory of Tours, 17
Groix, He de, 9, 55, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68,
69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 77, 95-7
Groix, monastery of, 41
Gu£rande, monastery of, 41
Guipel, 77
Gunhard, Bishop of Nantes, 23
Guorhwant, princeps of Brittany, 34,
35, 102
Gurmhailon, Count of Cornouaille andprinceps of Brittany, 39, 102
Gwynedd, 89
Hasten, see Hasteinn
Hdkonar saga gdda, 14
Hallfredr vandredaskald, 14Hals, Viking commander, 35
Hamburg, 24, 87
Harald Bluetooth, see Haraldr
Gormsson
Haraldr Gormsson (Harald Bluetooth),King of Denmark, 52
Haraldr (Hraold, Hroald), Viking com­mander, 42-3, 102-103
Haraldr, Viking commander, 25-6, 27,
32
Harolds saga ins harfagra, 14Harolds saga Sigurdarsonar, 14
Hasteinn (Hasten), 32, 34, 35, 36, 87,103
Hastings, Battle of, 54
Hebrides, the, 39, 91
Hedeby, 85, 89
Heimrich, Count, 36
Heimskringla, 14
Herbert of Vermandois, 44, 48
Hermoutier, monastery of, 41
Hiberno-Norse, 19, 49, 88, 92
Hincmar, chronicler, 15
Historia Normannorum, 17
Historia Remensis Ecclesiae, 16, 35
H61, 14
Honk, King of Denmark, 23-4, 27
Hraold, see Haraldr
HringsfJQrdr, 14
Hroald, see Haraldr
Hrdlfr (Rollo, G<?ngu-Hr61fr), Viking
commander, 20, 39-40,44, 45, 46,50,
82, 103-104
Hugh, Abbot, 34, 36
Hugh of Fleury, chronicler, 17, 43
Hugh the Great, 41, 44, 46, 48, 52, 53

The Vikings in Brittany
Hypothemius, St., 41
Hywel Dda, ruler of Wales, 89-90
Iceland, 19
Ille-et-Vilaine, 56, 63, 99
Immo, Bishpp, 29
Incon, Viking commander, 45-7, 48,
102-103
Inconmarc, 46
Indres, monastery of, 23, 33, 41, 52
Ingleby, 70
Ireland, 18-19, 39-40, 45, 50, 67, 90-2,
105
Irish, 18, 75, 88, 91-2
Irish Sea, 18, 50-1, 90-1
Iron Age, 55, 62
Islandbridge, 91
Jarlshof, 79
Jengland, Battle of, 26
John, Abbot, 47
Jdmsvikinga saga, 13-14
Jorvik, 88 (see also York)Judhael of Totnes, 54
Judicael, princeps of Brittany, 34, 36,
43, 102
Judicael Berengar, 43, 48, 52
Judith, daughter of Charles the Bald,
29
Jumieges, 23, 30, 31
Kermestre en Baud, 62Kmitr, King of Denmark and England,
90
Kootwijk, 104
La Hague, 78-9, 80, 100
Lamber en Ploumoguer, 62
Lambert, Count of Anjou, 22-3
Landdvennec, monastery of, 16-17, 40,
41, 43, 47, 55, 75, 94, 97
Lanlerf, 55, 56, 98
Lanmeur, monastery of, 75
Lann-Gouh Melrand, 76, 78
La Ranee, 56
Lavret, He, monastery on, 36, 41, 55,
75, 76, 98
L£hon, monastery of, 20, 40, 41
Le Mans, 23, 32, 33, 34, 44
L6on, monastery of, 53
Le Saint, monastery of, 41
Les Andelys, 80, 82, 100
Les Rues-des-Vignes, 83
Lezkelen en Plabennec, 62
L'Huernin, 44
Life of King Alfred, 18, 47

119/437

Life of Saint-Malo, 16Life of St. Samson, 16
Liffey, river, 91
Limerick, 92
Limousin, 44, 48
Lindholm H0je, 81
Lisieux, 35
Llandaff, 19
Llydaw (Brittany), 49
Locmaria, 64
Locmine', monastery of, 41
Locoal, hermitage of, 75
Loctudy, monastery of, 41
Loire Atlantique, 63, 95, 98
Loire, river, 10, 23-4, 26, 28-9, 30, 32,
35, 36, 40, 42, 45, 47, 48, 63, 75, 87,
95, 98, 101
Loire Vikings, 23-5, 27-9, 30, 31-2, 33,
34, 35, 36-7,40,42-7, 48, 50-1,58,71,
87-8, 95
Lothar I, Emperor, 25-6
Lothar II, 29, 31-2, 36
Lotharingia, 11
Lou-du-Lac, 62Louis the German, 29
Louis the Pious, Emperor, 22-5, 28
Louis the Stammerer, King, 29, 34
Louis III, 36
Louis IV of Outremer, 52, 53
Louvain, 37
Lydford, 91
machtierns, 38, 42, 62
Machutus, St., 40
Maeren, 79
Magnuss saga lengri, 13
Magntiss saga skemmri, 13
Maine, 11,29, 32, 35, 63, 82
Mammen style, 65
Man, Isle of, 50, 65, 77, 90, 105
Manche, 100-101
Marcellinus, St., 41
Marne, river, 30, 31, 37
Masserac, monastery of, 41
Mathedoi of Poher, 42
Maxent, St. (Maxentius), 34, 41
Mayenne, river, 31
Meaux, 36
Melenius, St., 41
Melun, Battle of, 32
Merovingian Empire, 22
Merovingians, 62, 85
Messay, monastery of, 40
Meudon, 77
Micklegate, Queen's Hotel, 88
Milford, 90

120/438

Saga-Book

Milton Abbas, monastery of, 41
Miracles of Saint-Benoit, 44
Miracula Sancti Bertini, 16
Mirville, 83

Moeren, Viking commander, 79, 103
Monasteries, 10, 17, 20-3, 26, 34-5, 40,
43, 47, 52-3, 55, 75, 76, 83, 85, 97-9
(see also by name)Mont Glonne, monastery of, 40
Montreuil-sur-Mer, 40, 104
Mont-Saint-Michel, 41, 51, 80, 82, 83,
100
Morbihan, 63, 95
Morvan, Breton leader, 22
Mouais, monastery of, 41
Myklebost, 67
Nantes, city of, 10, 15-16,23,26, 27, 32,
33, 34, 36, 37, 41, 42-4, 45, 47-8, 48,
53, 55, 58, 61-2, 63, 71, 75, 77, 84-5,
87-8, 90, 98, 101
county of, 9, 10, 23, 25-6, 36, 43
Nantes Vikings, 16, 44, 49, 71, 79 (seealso Loire Vikings)
Netherlands, 104
Neuss, 31
Neustria, 9, 11, 20, 28-9, 32, 33, 34-5,
40, 44, 50, 53, 63, 82, 104
Noirmoutier, 17, 22-3, 26, 33, 40, 41
Nominee, princeps of Brittany, 16, 226, 33, 52, 89, 102
Norden, Battle of, 36
Normandy, Duchy of, 9-10, 12, 17, 389, 42, 50-2, 53. 54-5, 77, 79, 80, 81-3,
89, 92, 94, 100-104
Norman Gate, the, 63
Normans, 9, 17-18, 20, 46, 52-3, 77, 82,104
Norse, see Norwegians
Northern Isles, 49, 50, 91
Norway, 19, 67, 79, 87
Norwegians (Norse), 9, 18, 25, 39, 42,
45, 67, 70, 87, 91
Noyon, 29, 30
Odo, King of the West Franks, 32
Ohter, see Ottarr
Oise, river, 44, 45
Olafr Tryggvason, King of Norway, 14

dttfsdrdpa, 14
dlafs saga Tryggvasonar, 14

Old Norse language, 64, 79
Oost-Souburg, 58
0resund, 79

Orkneyinga saga, 13

Orkney Islands, 39, 50, 91

Orleans, 29, 32, 41
Orne, river, 39
Oscelles, He de, 28-9, 30
6ttarr (Ohter), Viking commander, 423, 102-103
Ouse, river, 87, 104
Oust, river, 76
Padstow, 91
paganism, 40, 42, 47, 50, 52, 70
Paimpont, monastery of, 41
Paris, 17, 20, 24, 28-9, 30, 36, 42
Pascwethen, princeps of Brittany, 34,
35, 102
Paternus of Vannes, St., 41
Pays de Retz, 26
Pembrokeshire, 90
Peran, 48
Perigeux, 63
Peter, St., coin of, 56, 59, 60, 98
gate of, 63
Philibert, St., 17, 23
Picts, 105
Pippin II of Aquitaine, 28, 32, 42
Pippin III, King, 21
Pitres, 28, 30, 31-2, 79, 80, 100
Pledeliac, 77
Ptedran, 55, 57
Plelan, 34
Plesse, 61
Plessis Grimoult, 83
Plougonvelin, monastery of, 41
Plouneour-Mlnez, monastery of, 41
Plourivo, 47, 48
Poher, 42
Poitiers, 27, 31-2, 33, 34
Poitou, 11, 23-4, 32, 35, 40Pope, the, 32
Poutrocoet, county, of 10
Priziac, 76
Provence, 11
Prudentius, chronicler, 15
Quentovic, 23
Questembert, Battle, of, 36, 43, 49
Quettehon, 83
Quimper, monastery of, 10, 40, 41
Quimperle', monastery of, 41
Radbod, Abbot of Dol, 43
Radicatel, 83
Ragnall of Dublin, 88
Ragnarr lodbrok, Viking commander,
19, 87Ralph, King of the west Franks, 46
Ranee, river, 10

The Vikings in Brittany
Ranulf, Count, 32
Raoul I, 44
Redon, 10, 15, 20, 25-7, 34, 41
Regino of Priim, chronicler, 17, 32, 34,36-7
relics, 17, 20, 26, 29, 34, 40-1, 75, 84(see also by saints' names)
Renaud, Count, 23
Rennes, city of, 10, 20, 22, 34, 35, 41,
48, 61, 63, 76, 88
county of, 9, 10, 25-6, 48
Reville, 79, 80, 81, 101
Reynald, Count of Nantes, 23
Rheims, monastery of, 16
Rhine, river, 26, 31-2, 35-6
Rhineland, the, 35-6
Rhodri Mawr, King of Gwynedd, 89
Rhone, river, 30
rt, 19Richard I, ruler of Normandy, 52, 103
Richard II, Duke of Normandy, 53,103
Richard III, Duke of Normandy, 103
Richer of Rheims, chronicler, 52
Richmondshire, 54
Ricoin, Count, 28
Rieux, 61
Risle, river, 39
Riwallon, moneyer, 83
Riwallon of Dol, Breton leader, 54
Robert I, Duke of Normandy, 53, 103
Robert of Anjou, 32, 33
Robert of Neustria, 43
Robert the Strong, 29-31
Rodulf, Viking commander, 32
Rognvaldr, Viking commander, 42-6,
50-1, 70, 82, 102-103
Rognvaldr Mcerajarl, Earl, 39
Roland, Carolingian leader, 21
Rollo, see Hrolfr
Romans, 62Rome, 25, 34
Roric, Viking commander, 25-7, 29
Rouen, 23, 26, 30, 52, 53, 79, 80, 82,
101
Roumois, 39
Rudolf, Count, 28
Rufflac, monastery of, 41
runic inscriptions, 13
Rusticus, St., 29
Saint-Aignan, 47
Saint-Andre', monastery of, 41
Saint-Aubin, church of, 31
Saint-Bertin, monastery of, 17
Saint-Brieuc, 10, 41, 47, 48, 55-6, 64

121/439Saint-Croix de Quimperle', monasteryof, 17Saint-Denis, monastery of, 28
Saint Felix, basilica of, 48
Saint-Florent, 26
Saint-Florent-le-Vieil, monastery of, 40
Saint-Germain-des-Pr£s, monastery of,28, 39, 104
Saint-Gildas-de-Rhuis, monastery of,
41
Saint-Guenael, monastery of, 40
Saint-Guenold, monastery of, 40
Saint-Herve'-en-Lanrivoar6, hermitageof, 75Saint-Jacut, monastery of, 41
Saint-Jouin-de-Marnes, monastery of,40
Saint-L6, 37, 83
Saint-Malo, monastery of, 41, 55, 75,
99, 104Saint-Martin, monastery of, 26, 84,104
Saint-Martin de Mondeville, 83
Saint-Martin-de-Vertou, monastery of,40
Saint-Maxent, monastery of, 41
Saint-M£en, monastery of, 41
Saint-Melaine, monastery of, 34, 41, 76
Saint-Meur-des-Fosse's, 30
Saint-Nazaire, monastery of, 41
Saint-Philibert-de-Grand-Lieu, monas­
tery of, 40, 41
Saint-Pol-de-L6on, monastery of, 10,
41, 62Saint-Saturnin-en-Plomeur, hermitageof, 75Saint-Stephen, church of, 28
Saint Suliac, 55, 56, 99
Saint-Tudy, monastery of, 41
Saint-Tugdual, monastery of, 41
Saint-Val6ry-sur-Somme, 29, 31
Saint-Vincent, church of, 28
Salle des F6tes, 75
Salomon, King of Brittany, 16, 26, 29,
31-4, 39, 46, 89, 102
Salvator of Alet, 40
Samson, St., 41, 75
Sarthe, river, 31
Saxons, 23, 31
Saxony, 11, 29
Scheldt, river, 26, 27, 29, 38
Scotland, 50, 89, 91-2, 104
scriptoria, 10, 20
Seine-Maritime, 100-101
Seine, river, 22-4, 26, 27, 28-9, 30, 32,
35, 38, 40, 44, 45, 52, 53,80, 82, 100101

122/440

Saga-Book

Seine Vikings, 23-5, 29, 30, 31, 32, 3640, 43, 45, 50, 79, 95, 100, 104
Sens, river, 75
Septimania, 11
Sermo Lupi ad Anglos, 42
Severn, river, 42
Shetland Islands, 91
Sidroc, Viking commander, 26-9, 30,
75, 103
Sigefrid, Viking commander, 32, 103
Sigfrid Sigtryggsson, Viking com­mander, 52, 53
Sighvatr I>6r6arson, 14
Sigifrid, Viking commander, 35-7, 103
Sjaelland, 79
slaves and slave-raiding, 42-3
Slavs, 36, 79
Smiss, 71, 73
Snorri Sturluson, 14
Somme, river, 25, 29-30
Somme Vikings, 25, 29-30, 38
Song of Aiquin, 61
Spain, 30, 104
Spanish March, 11
Stenkyrka, 71, 73
Sveinn Forkbeard, King of Denmark
and England, 53, 90
Sweden, 28
Talon, 39
Tara, 92
Tavistock, 91
Tettenhall, Battle of, 88
Therouanne, 30
Thibaud, Norman commander, 53
Tormod, Viking commander, 52, 53
Toulouse, 24
Touraine, the, 11, 32, 35, 84
Tournus, monastery of, 40
Tours, 26, 29, 33, 34, 37, 43, 84
Trans, 48, 55, 56, 58, 61, 62, 77, 99
Treaty of Saint-Clair-sur-Epte', 39
Treguennec, 77
TrSguier, monastery of, 10, 41, 104
Trelleborg, 56, 61, 79
Trilbardon Bridge, 30
tuath, 19
Urne, river, 55
Uurmonoc, chronicler, 16, 36
Vannes, 10, 21-2, 41, 63-4, 77
Vendee, the, 22
Venddmois, the, 25
Verberie, 29

Vernon, 80, 82, 101
Vertou, monastery of, 23, 41
Vexin, the, 39
Vieux M'Na, 56, 58, 61, 99
Vikingarvisur, 14
Vikings, 14, 16-19, 21-9, 31-2, 34-5, 3740, 42, 44-9, 48, 50-4. 56, 61-2, 70-1,
75, 77-9, 82, 85, 88-93, 98-100,102-5
armies and fleets, 10-11, 16, 18, 2132, 36-9, 42-5, 49, 51, 75, 86-7, 92
kingship, 15, 23, 27-8, 86
raids, 9, 15, 20-32, 33, 34-7, 39, 42-5,
51-2, 53, 61, 75, 76, 79, 82, 84, 867, 89, 97-9 (see also Loire Vikings,
Nantes Vikings, Seine Vikings,
Somme Vikings and commanders'
names)
use of term, 9, 21, 40, 50, 92
Vilaine, river, 9, 10, 26, 34, 35, 76
vineyards, 32, 34, 51
Vtnheidr, Battle of, 90 (see also Brunanburh)
Vire, river, 36
Vitr<5, 64
Vurm, Viking commander, 35
Waal, river, 26
Walcheren Island, 23
Wales, 12, 13-14, 19-20, 42, 48, 54, 8992
Waterford, 92, 105
Weland, Viking commander, 29, 30, 31,103
Welf, Carolingian commander, 28
wergild, 32
Wesfaldingi (Westfoldings), 25, 70, 87
Wessex, 18-19, 29, 37, 61, 86, 89-90
Westfoldings, see Wesfaldingi
Wexford, 92, 105
Wido, Carolingian commander, 21-2
Wilhomar, Breton leader, 22
William I 'Longsword', ruler of Nor­
mandy, 9, 46, 50, 52, 82, 83, 84, 100,
103
William II 'The Bastard', 'The Con­
queror', Duke of Normandy and Kingof England, 20, 53-4, 103
William of Malmesbury, chronicler, 41
Worms, Battle of, 23
Wulfstan, Archbishop, 42, 90
York, 18, 50-1, 54, 56, 59, 60, 87-9, 912
Zeeland, 58