Artikel
LK-Verlags UG

AIDSSARS BSE
CoronaMERS

The Virus
Misconception
Teil IDr Stefan Lanka

2 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

The Virus Misconception
Measles as an example
Dr Stefan Lanka

Contrary to what most people believe,
pathogenic viruses do not exist. The
claims about the existence of viruses andviral diseases are based on historic misinterpretations and not, as I thought in thepast – on fraud or deliberate deception.
We now have new, better, and in the positive meaning of the word “scientific” discoveries and explanations for the origin,therapy and prevention of many diseases, some of which are still called “viral”
today.
The phenomenon of simultaneous orsubsequent appearance of symptoms in
different persons, which has been until
now interpreted as contagion and was
believed to be caused by the transmissionof pathogens, is now also easy to understand through new discoveries. Thus, we
now have a new view of life (which in reality is an old view) and of the cosmologicalintegration of biological processes.
The “new”, but in reality only re-discovered perspective could only originate
outside of the official “science”; one of
the reasons for this is that the people
involved in scientific institutions do not
fulfil their first and most important scientific duty – to permanently doubt andquestion everything. Otherwise, theywould have already discovered that themisinterpretation had been taking place
for a long time already and had becomea dogma only by means of unscientificactivities in the years 1858, 1953 and 1954.

The transition to a new explanation ofhealth, disease and healing will only
succeed because all the concerned therapists and scientists can save face with
it. From history and within the new perspective on biology and life, we now also
have explanations of emotions, ignorance
and all kinds of human behaviour. This is
the second optimistic message. Turning
around and forgiving the errors of thepast can take place even more effectively, the more one understands what happened and learns for the future.
I am aware that for all the people directly involved, such as doctors, virologists,
health care professionals, and above all
for the people affected by the system,
who suffer under misdiagnoses or who
have even lost relatives on account of it,it may be difficult to intellectually accept
the explanation of reality that I will offer in this article. In order that the germ
theory doesn’t develop a dangerous momentum, as was the case with AIDS, BSE,
SARS, MERS, Corona and various otheranimal flu cases, or even lead to a publicorder breakdown, I am politely asking all
the people who are discovering just now
the facts about the “non-existence” ofthe alleged viruses to discuss the topic
in an objective and unemotional manner.

3

WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

The current situation
All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are basedon easily recognisable, understandable and verifiable misinterpretations. The real causes of diseases and phenonema which
are ascribed to viruses have already been discovered and researched; this knowledge is now available. All scientists who
think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actuallyworking with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells
that were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus.
In reality, those prepared tissues and cells are dying because
they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab.
Virologists primarily believe in the existence of viruses, because they add allegedly “infected” blood, saliva or otherbody fluids to the tissue and cell culture, and this, it must
be stressed, after having withdrawn the nutrients from therespective cell culture and after having started poisoning itwith toxic antibiotics. They believe that the cell culture is thenkilled by viruses. The key insight, however, is that the deathof the tissue and cells takes place in the exact same manner
when no “infected” genetic material is added at all. The virologists have apparently not noticed this fact! According to themost basic scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct,
control experiments should have been carried out. In order
to confirm the newly discovered method of so-called “virus
propagation”, in order to see whether it was not the method
itself causing or falsifying the result, the scientists would have
had to perform additional experiments, called negative control experiments, in which they would add sterile substancesor substances from healthy people and animals to the cell culture. This, of course, to check whether it is not the method
itself that yields or falsifies the results.
These control experiments have never been carried out by theofficial “science” to this day. During the measles virus trial, I
commissioned an independent laboratory to perform thesecontrol experiments and the result was that the tissues andcells die, due to the laboratory conditions, in the exact same
way as when they come into contact with allegedly “infected”
material.
The entire purpose of control experiments is to exclude theposibility that it is the applied method or technique which
may cause the result. Control experiments, then, are the highest duty in science and also the exclusive basis of claimingthat one’s conclusion is scientific. During the measles virus
trial it was the legally appointed expert – Dr. Podbielski, see
further in this article – who stated that the papers which are
crucial for the entire science of virology contain no control
experiments. From this we can conclude that the respective
scientists have been working extremely unscientifically, andthis without even noticing it.
This completely unscientific approach originated in June 1954,
when an unscientific and refutable speculative article waspublished, according to which the death of tissue in a test

tube was considered a possible evidence for the presence of avirus. Six months later, on 10 December 1954, the main authorof this opinion was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine foranother equally speculative theory. The speculation from June
1954 was then raised to a scientific fact due to this distinction1
and became a dogma which has never been challenged to thisdate. Since June 1954, the death of tissue and cells in a test
tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus.

The apparent evidence for the existence of viruses
The death of tissues/cells is also regarded as the isolationof a virus, because they claim that something from the outside, from another organism, was presumably brought into
the laboratory. The fact is and remains that a virus has neverbeen, the fact is and remains that a virus has never been
isolated according to the meaning of the word isolation – hasnever been isolated according to the meaning of the word
isolation, and it has never been photographed and biochemically characterised as a whole unique structure. The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses, for example, really
only show cellular particles from dying tissue and cells, andmost photos show only a computer model (CGI – computer
generated images). Because the involved parties BELIEVE
that the dying tissue and cells transform themselves intoviruses, their death is also regarded as propagation of thevirus. The involved parties still believe this because the discoverer of this method was awarded the Nobel Prize andhis papers remain the reference papers on “viruses”. Moreabout this below.
It is important to mention that this unpurified mixture consisting of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics, is also being used as a “live”
vaccine, because it is supposed to be composed of “attenuated” viruses. The death of tissue and cells – on account of
starvation and poisoning and not because of an alleged infection – has continuously been misinterpreted as evidence
for the existence of viruses, as evidence for their isolation
and as evidence of their propagation.
Thus, the resulting toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign
nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes andspores of all types is labelled as a “live vaccine”. It is implanted
in children through vaccination mainly into the muscles, in aquantity which if it were injected into the veins would immediately lead to certain death. Only ignorant people who blindly
trust in the state authorities who are “testing”and approving
the vaccines can regard vaccination as a “small harmless prick”.
The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and negligence of
these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines aresafe, have little or no side-effects and would protect us from adisease. None of these claims is true and scientific, on the contrary: upon precise scientific analysis, one finds that vaccines
are useless and the respective literature admits to the lack ofany evidence in their favour.2
Individual molecules are extracted from the components

4 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

Diagram 1:
Control experiments are missing and thus it has been ignored
that there is only a hypothetical and imaginary evidence forviruses and no material, scientific evidence.

Cutting
nutrients

So-called injectionof blood or saliva
from sick people

Poisonous antibiotics,
which kill cells

++++
+++
++
“Infectious experiment”

No infection

The cells are supposed to become“hungry” in orderto more easily absorb the allegedviruses.

The antibiotics aresupposed to exclude that the expected death of thecells is caused bybacteria.

With only a few mouse clicks as well, a program can create any
virus by putting together molecules of short parts of nucleic acids from dead tissue and cells with a determined biochemicalcomposition, thus arranging them as desired into a longer genotype which is then declared to be the complete genome of the
new virus. In reality, not even this manipulation, called “align-

False belief:
The cells die from a virus

The cells die
by starvationand poisoning

++++
+++
++
“Control experiments”
To date, neither medicine
nor “science” have carriedout control experiments.

of dead tissue and cells, they are misinterpreted to be part ofa virus and are theoretically put together into a virus model.
It must be stressed, that a real and complete virus does not appear anywhere in the entire “scientific” literature. This is because
the process to come to such a description is not done by any scientific method, but purely by means of consensus, in which theparticipants traditionally argue for years on what pieces of genetic code “belong” to the “virus” and what pieces don’t. In the caseof the measles virus, for example, this has taken several decades.
Surprisingly, in the case of the apparently new China Coronavirus
2019 (2019-nCoV, meanwhile re-named), this consensus-finding
process has lasted only a few mouse clicks.

The cells diefrom starvationand poisoning

Reality:
The cells die from starvation and poisoning

ment”, can result in the “complete” genetic material of a virus
which could then be called its genome. In this process of theoretical construction of the so-called “viral DNA or viral RNA
strands”, those sequences that don’t fit are “smoothed out”
and missing ones are added. Thus, a RNA or DNA sequenceis invented which doesn’t exist in reality and which was neverdiscovered and scientifically demonstrated as a whole.
In a nutshell: From short fragments, theoretically and according
to a model of a viral DNA or RNA strand, a bigger piece is also
theoretically fabricated, which in reality doesn’t exist. For example, the “conceptual” construction of the “RNA strand” of themeasles virus with its short fragments of cellular particles lacks
more than half of the genetic sequences which would represent
a complete virus. These are in part artificially created by biochemical methods and the rest are simply invented.3
The Chinese scientists, who now claim that the nucleic acids from which the genome of the new China-Coronavi-

5

WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

Diagram 2:
How a viral genetic sequence is hypothetically constructed from typical cellular molecules and how it was provenduring the measles virus trial that “viruses” are only artificial imaginary models.

Dying Cells

+

A

+

B

+

X

C

Y

Z

Isolation of
specific particles(nucleic acids)

X
A

+

Y

+

B

Typical components of dying
cells

C
Z

A virus has neverappeared nor
has it been seen
in a humanrus-2019 was theoretically constructed4 probably originate
from poisonous snakes, are just as much the victims ofthe global misconception regarding “viruses” as we all are.
The more viral genetic sequences are invented in the aforementioned way, the more they “discover” similarities witheverything. As such, and quite ironically, there is method tothe error. A large part of our academic science works like
this: A theory is invented, it is always argued inside the theory, they call it science and claim that this represents thereality. In reality it just represents the postulated theory.5

The Virus Tests
Due to the lack of negative control experiments, it hasn’t yet
occurred to the involved scientists that all tests for “viruses”
will result in a certain number of “positives”, depending on thesensitivity of the calibration of the testing equipment. The templates that are used in the tests that supposedly find “viruses”
don’t come from “viruses”, but rather from the tissue, cells andfoetal serum (blood without specific components) coming fromanimals, mainly monkeys and calves. Because these animals arebiochemically very similar to us humans, it is clear that such particles, which are misinterpreted as viral particles, can be found in
all humans by means of “virus tests”. Some “viruses” and theirvaccines – although not the measles “virus”– actually originate
from aborted human foetuses. It is especially eye-opening herethat all the tests detect molecules which exist in every humanbeing and that vaccines can cause particularly dangerous allergic
reactions, which have been named “auto-immune diseases”.

Determinationof the composition

..
.

=A
=B
=C

Small particles aretheoretically added
into a virus model

A B C

=X
=Y
=Z

The scientists believethat the cellular particles
are pieces of a virus

The people involved
believe that this imaginary model represents
a “virus”, although thismodel was never foundin real life.

The use of foetal serum, considered to be “liquid” tissue, slows
down the death of the cells and tissues under examination somuch that, without it, most of these experiments could neverbe carried out in the first place. Only the employment of foetal
serum is useful to these scientists, neither serum coming fromadult living beings, nor any other synthetic product can be a substitute. One of the most contaminated und impure components
of vaccines is the bovine foetal serum, without which the tissue
and cells in the laboratory don’t grow at all or don’t grow quickly enough, and which is extracted in the most gruesome manner from foetuses without anaesthesia. It contains all kinds ofknown and unknown microbes, their spores and a huge numberof unknown proteins. Besides the particles from monkey kidney
tissue, it is also particles of this foetal serum that scientists are
extracting and analysing when they believe that they are putting
together a “virus”, which does not exist and was never proven in
the entire “scientific” literature as a whole “virus”.
Because the vaccines are exclusively manufactured on the basis of these substances, this explains why it is especially thevaccinated people who test “positive” to all these imaginary“viruses” from which vaccines are manufactured. The tests
only react to animal particles of the alleged viruses, animal proteins or nucleic acids which are often identical or very similar tohuman proteins and nucleic acids. The virus tests do not findanything specific, certainly nothing “viral” and on account of
this they are worthless. The consequences, however, as we haveseen with Ebola, HIV, Influenza etc., are that people become
paralyzed with fear and they often die due to the very dangerous treatment.

6 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

It is noteworthy that no so-called “virus test” has a “yes” or“no” result, rather they are calibrated in a way that they can beinterpreted as “positive” only after a particular concentrationlevel has been reached. Thus, one can arbitrarily test “positive”
just a few people, many people, none or all people and animals,
according to the calibration of the test kit. The dimension ofthis entire scientific illusion becomes clear as soon as we understand that otherwise quite “normal” symptoms are only diagnosed as AIDS, BSE, flu, measles etc. if there is a “positive”
test for it.

ed as well, after the contradictory data of the so-called humangenome project was published together with the embarrassing claim that the entire human genome had been mapped,even though more than half of it was completely invented.7
People are not aware that it is very difficult for the respective
academics to admit that they were involved in such misconceptions.

The so-called bacteria-eaters
Crucial Details
Up to 1952, the virologists believed that a virus was a toxic
protein or enzyme directly poisoning the body, and that it
was somehow multiplied by the body itself and would spreadin the body as well as between people and between animals.
Medicine and science gave up on this idea in 1951, because
the suspected virus had never been seen in an electron microscope and, above all, no control experiments had ever been
carried out. It was acknowledged that even healthy animals,organs and tissue would release the same decay products during the decomposing process that had been previously misinterpreted as “viruses”. Virology had refuted itself.6
However, when the wife of the later Nobel prize winner Crickdrew a double helix and this drawing was published in the famous scientific magazine Nature as an alleged scientificallydeveloped model of the supposed DNA, a new and very successful hype began, the so-called molecular genetics. Fromthat moment on, the causes of disease were thought to bein the genes. The idea of a virus changed and over night avirus was no longer a toxin, but rather a dangerous genetic sequence, a dangerous DNA, a dangerous viral strand etc. This
new genetic virology was founded by young chemists who had
no idea about biology and medicine, but they had unlimited
research money. And most probably they didn’t know that theold virology had already refuted itself and given up.
For over 2000 years we have the saying: “Forgive them, forthey know not what they do”. Since 1995, since we asked thequestions about the evidence and published the answers, we
can add: “ For they can’t admit that what they have learned
and practiced isn’t true and, and stronger even, that it is dangerous and even lethal”. Because nobody until now understood the entire context and had the courage to say the truth,
we now have even more “evil spirits” (quoting Goethe) andsubsidiary hypotheses, such as the “immune system” or “epigenetics”, merely in order to maintain the fictitious theories.
In origin, the idea of a virus arose from the forced logic of thedogma of cellular theory . Then came the idea of the pathogenic bacteria, the bacterial toxins, then the viral toxins, until
this idea was finally given up in 1952. Starting with 1953, Virchow’s idea of a disease poison (Latin for: “poison”) became
the genetic virus, which in turn gave birth to the idea of thecancer genes. Then we had the “war against cancer” of the
Nixon era, and later the idea of genes for everything appeared.
In the year 2000, however, the entire genetic theory was refut-

The source for the idea of a genetic virus in humans, animals
and plants, which started to develop from 1953 onwards, were
the so-called bacteria-eaters, called (bacterio)phages, which
had drawn the attention of scientists since 1915. From 1938
on, when commercially available electron microscopes wereapplied in research, these phages could be photographed,isolated as whole particles and all their components could
be biochemically determined and characterised. This is real,and cannot be contested. To isolate them, i.e. concentrate
the particles and separate them from all other components(=isolation), to photograph them immediately in the isolated
state and to biochemically characterise them all in one go –this, however, has never happened with the alleged virusesof humans, animals and plants because these do not exist.
The scientists researching bacteria and phages, who worked
with actual existing structures, provided a model as to what
human, animal and plant viruses could look like. However,the “phage experts” have overlooked by their misinterpretation of phages as bacteria eaters that the phenomenon of
the formation of these particles is caused by the extreme
inbreeding of bacteria. This effect, i.e. the formation andrelease of phages (bacteria eaters, aka bacteria viruses),doesn’t happen amongst pure bacteria, freshly extracted
from an organism or the environment. When their nutrients are withdrawn slowly or their living conditions become
impossible, normal bacteria – that is: bacteria which are
not grown in the lab – create the known survival forms, thespores, which can survive for a long time or even “eternally”.
From spores, new bacteria appear as soon as the living conditions improve.
However, isolated bacteria, when grown in the lab, lose all
characteristics and abilities. Many of them do not perish automatically through this in-breeding, but rather turn suddenly and completely into small particles, which in the “goodversus evil” theory perspective have been misinterpreted asbacteria-eaters. In reality, bacteria originate from these exact“phages” and they turn back again into these life forms when
the living conditions are no longer available. Günther Enderlein(1827–1968) described exactly these processes more than a century ago: how bacteria appear from invisible structures, theirdevelopment into more complex forms and back again. That is
why Enderlein did not agree with the cell theory, according towhich life appears from cells and is organised at cellular level.8
As a young student, I myself isolated such a “phage” structurefrom a sea algae. and believed at that time to have discovered
the first harmless virus, the first stable “virus host system”.9

7 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

The idea, furthermore, that bacteria exist as single viable organisms, which can exist alone without any other life forms,
is incorrect. In isolated form, they automatically die off aftersome time. This never occurred to the scientists, because
after a successful “isolation” of a bacterium, a part of it isfrozen and can be worked with in the lab decades later. The
idea of bacteria being living independent structures which
can survive by themselves is a laboratory artefact, a misinterpretation.
Thus, the claim that is made on the basis of that myth, thatbacteria are immortal, is therefore untrue. Bacteria are immortal only in symbiosis with a huge number of other bacteria, fungi and probably many more unknown life forms which
are difficult to characterise, such as for example the amoeba.
Amoebae, bacteria and fungi form spores as soon as theirliving environment disappears and re-emerge once the living conditions return. If one compares that with humans, wehave the same perspective: without a living environment,from and with which we live, nothing can exist.
However, these discoveries go much deeper. Not only the entire
species concept is dissolving, but also the idea and the claim
about the alleged existence of dead matter. Observations andconclusions about a living “active matter” (as physicists call it)
are dismissed as unscientific vitalism. There is considerable evidence, however, that all those elements which the “dominantopinion” in “science” does not consider as being alive, actually originate and develop from the membrane of water, i.e. the“Ursubstanz”10, or primordial source of life. These elements
then create the nucleic acids, and around the nucleic acids
they create the biological life in the form of amoebae, bacteria, tardigrades and ever-more complex life forms. We have two
distinct confirmations on this perspective. One of them can beobserved by every person for himself as well as for other people, i.e. that biological life in the form of our body is actually amaterialisation of the elements of an existing conscience. We
can name them and we know the exact way in which our organs
and psyche interact and influence each other through information. It is known, for instance, that a single word can either dodamage or solve a conflict. We can verify all these aspects because they are predictable. Thus, the three criteria of scientificresearch are fulfilled.11 This is important, because these findings and the knowledge on how they relate to each other free us
from fear as well as from the fear-inducing “good versus evil”
mentality and what is even more important: the sick-making
behavioural patterns derived from it. These revealing scientificdiscoveries clarify as well the processes of disease, healing, the“healing crisis”, the suspended healing and the phenomenonof subsequent diseases (aka the old concept of “contagion”).
Virus, it’s time to go.12
The nightmare of materialistic science, then, seems to cometrue: even apparently dead matter is alive, it is vital. The vitalism, according to which there is a life force in all things, wascontested by the Greek philosophers Democritus and Epicurius
and the followers of their doctrine. Their main argument wasthat they wanted to castigate any abuse of faith and prevent its
repetition. Their intention was apparently good. However, theyignored that by denying the concepts of conscience and spirit

and all the levels of manifestation of these forces, they turned
involuntarily into destroyers of life and enemies of the people.
These “good versus evil” interpretations are constantly increasing due to the thirst for profit and its fatal consequences, which were discovered and described by Silvio Gesell13 (ingeneral) and Ivan Illich14 (in medicine), are constantly increasing15 due to the thirst for profit and its fatal consequences. The
consequences of our money system’s inherent compulsion toeven more growth, to permanent growth even, which generates
cyclical catastrophes and brings about ever more powerfulwinners and simultaneously a constantly increasing impoverishment and suffering, is interpreted by all the people involved
as proof for an independent principle of evil, because thesepeople don’t know the mathematically determined, tenacious
inherent mechanisms of the money system. It appears that thepeople on the winning side, who are ethically correct, regard
the mathematically obligatory generated profit as evidence of
their godliness and exceptionality. This was not just the basis
for Manichaeism (Mani was the Babylonian founder of this religion, whose followers are called Manichaens), but has always
been the driving force of the dangerous aspects and effects ofindustrialisation, as Max Weber and others discovered.

The Resuscitation of Virology by Nobel Prize WinnerJohn Franklin Enders
We have explained in several articles in our magazine “WissenschafftPlus” starting with the year 2014 the greater frameworkof the misguided development of biology and medicine, theuntenable dogma of the so-called cell theory, which claimed
that the body develops from cells and not from tissues. The celltheory of life, the “cellular pathology”, invented by Rudolf Virchow in 1858, which to date is the exclusive basis for biology andmedicine, claims that all disease (as well as all life) originatesfrom a single cell, which is somehow hijacked by a virus, starts
to deteriorate and then propagates that virus. Two crucial aspects served as precondition and basis for the current global
acceptance of cellular pathology, from which the infectious theory, the genetic, immune and cancer theories have developed,
was only possible because of two crucial aspects.
a. The cell theory was only implemented because Rudolf Virchow suppressed crucial discoveries about tissues. The findings
and insights with respect to the structure, function and central
importance of tissues in the creation and development of life,
which were already known in 1858, comprehensively refute thecell theory and the subsequently derived genetic, immune andcancer theories.16
b. The infection theories were only established as a global dogma through the concrete politics and eugenics of the Third Reich. Before 1933, scientists dared to contradict this theory; after
1933, these critical scientists were silenced.17
In order to work with “viruses” and carry out so-called infectious experiments, before the concept of virology was abandoned in 1952, the “virologists” were forced to dissolve andfiltrate “diseased” and putrescent tissue. The concentrat-

8 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

ed filtrate, so they believed, contained a pathogen, a toxin,
which they thought would be constantly produced by the infected cells. Until 1952, a “virus” was defined as a pathogenic
poison in the form of a protein, which as an enzyme caused
damage in an unknown manner, would cause disease and betransmissible. After 1953, the year in which the alleged DNA
in the form an alleged alpha helix was publicly announced,
the idea of a virus became a malignant genotype wrapped inproteins. Thus, a paradigm shift took place between 1952 to1954 regarding the image of a virus.
“Infectious experiments” with animals were carried out withthe filtrated fluids from putrescent organisms or from fluids allegedly containing the proteins/enzymes which were
supposed to represent the virus. The results were meant toprove that a virus was present and would cause the illness
ascribed to it. However, what is never mentioned publicly isthat the symptoms allegedly caused in human beings by a virus could never be replicated in animal experiments, instead
there were always only “similar” symptoms, which they thenclaimed to be identical with the disease in humans. However,none of this has ever been proven scientifically.
To date, all “infectious experiments” are missing the control
experiments, i.e. the proof that the symptoms are not causedby the “treatment” of the genetic material in the so-called“infectious” experiment. In order to exclude that it was not
the fluids of diseased tissue that caused the symptoms, one
would have had to do an identical experiment, only with other fluids or with sterilised fluids. However, that has never
happened. Extremely cruel animal experiments are carriedout to date – for example in order to prove the transmissibility of measles; during these experiments, monkeys aretied up and immobilised in a vacuum chamber with a tube in
their nose, and then scientists insert the allegedly infectedfluids through that tube into their trachea and lungs. The
exact same damage would be caused by sterile saline solution, sterilised blood, pus or saliva. The induced symptoms,
which are only “similar” to those ascribed to measles, arethen claimed to be measles.
Since the allegedly infected fluids are pressed through a filter which allegedly filters out bacteria and they are slightly heated, the scientists claim that the suffering and deathof the animals in those experiments cannot be caused bybacteria, but rather by smaller “pathogens”, the viruses. The
concerned scientists conveniently ignored the fact alreadyacknowledged at that time that there are there are much
more unknown bacteria than known ones, that many bacteria are heat resistant and that they form spores which cannot
be filtrated. It is important to mention here that there is noevidence whatsoever that bacteria cause any disease either.
They are of course often present in the disease process,like the firemen putting out the fire. Bacteria do not cause
disease, but rather they participate in biological meaningful reparation processes. As with viruses, the only so-called
evidence for the apparently negative role of bacteria are thehorrific animal experiments which are completely meaningless, since all control experiments are missing.

Enders and Polio
Up to the year 1949, the “virologists” cultivated their suspected “viruses” (proteins) by placing a piece of putrescent genetic material, which had been taken from a tissue allegedly
infected by a virus, on a slice of “healthy” tissue of the same
type. The visible intensification of the putrefaction process,which was transmitted from the “sick” tissue to the “healthy”
tissue, was misinterpreted as proliferation and spreading of
the virus, of the pathogenic poison. Due to control experiments with healthy tissue carried out for the first time in 1951,
the virologists discovered that what they saw were quite normal processes of tissue decay and not a virus that would only
be present in “sick” tissue.
Enter John Franklin Enders. In 1949, he “discovered” by chance –because he had no fresh “healthy” nerve tissue available – that
other types of tissue started to decompose as well if a piece ofbrain from a person who died of polio was placed on it. Previously, the virologists had believed that every virus could only
propagate in the organic material that it would also damage. For
the alleged discovery that “viruses” propagate in other tissues
as well, which they don’t damage in live humans, Enders and theother involved academics were awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine on the 10th of June 1954.
From then on, the alleged “polio virus” was propagated by mixing human foetal skin tissue and muscle with brain substancefrom people who had died of “polio”, the mixture of which thencollectively decayed. The filtrate from this mixture, then, wasconsidered to contain a “virus”. The famous Jonas Salk adopted
this exact idea without naming the inventor. Salk used the filtrateof decayed human foetal tissue as a polio vaccine, the New YorkTimes stated that the vaccine worked and would be safe, andSalk generated millions of dollars with the polio vaccine, without
sharing anything with the real inventor of the idea of using decomposing human foetuses.18
For these reasons, Enders worked hard to develop another technique, for which he could take the credit from the very beginning.
He chose the second most lucrative area of the germ theory of
disease, namely that of the symptoms called measles. Enders
used the same ideas and methods from bacteriology (in which
he had graduated) and believed that the phages were the virusesof bacteria.
Analogous to this technique of demonstrating how phages allegedly destroy bacteria on a Petri dish, he developed
a tissue streak on which allegedly infected fluid was placed.
Analogous to the dying off of the bacteria, the dying off of thetissue streak was claimed to be at the same time the presence of the suspected virus, the proof for its existence, its
isolation and its multiplication. This precise protocol is still
applied to date in the case of measles and, slightly modified, as “evidence” of all pathogenic viruses.19 The mixtureof dying or dead cells/tissues is now called a “live vaccine”.
If single particles of dead tissue or synthethically produced
molecules are used in vaccines, the experts call it “killed vaccine” or “inactivated vaccine”.

9 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

Enders blamed the strikingly high numbers of deaths and injuries
that the Salk polio vaccine caused in the population on the contamination of the vaccine with unknown human viruses, which is
why he worked in his lab with tissues from monkey kidneys andfoetal serum from horses and unborn calves.
There are four striking and crucial differences between the evidence of the existing (bacterio)phages and Enders’ alleged evidence of the hypothetic “viruses” in humans and animals. These
differences clarify Enders’ wrong assumptions, since he completely forgot his earlier clearly expressed doubts once he hadreceived the Nobel prize, and so he led all of his colleagues andconsequently the entire world (see the Corona panic) down thewrong path…. Or: exactly the same thing as is happening now,with the Corona-panic The entire world, except a pretty but stubborn schwabian village near lake Constanz (where Dr Lanka lives,note of the translator):
1. The (bacterio)phages have indeed been isolated in the meaningof the word “isolation” with standard methods (density gradientcentrifugation). Immediately after the isolation they have been
photographed in an electron microscope, their purity is determined and then their components, their proteins and their DNA
have been biochemically described all at once, in one single paper.

all because of his Nobel prize for the “human foetus/polio
virus vaccine” in December 1954. A few months after having
received his Nobel prize, Enders forgot or suppressed thediscrepancies and doubts that he had mentioned himself in
his 1954 paper. Still suffering due to the plagiarism committed
by Jonas Salk, who had stolen his idea for the polio vaccine,Enders stated that all future developments of a measles vaccine would have to be based on his (Enders’) technique.
Enders killed his tissue cultures himself unintentionallythrough the treatment with antibiotics (without negative control experiments – and this is a crucial aspect in the context
of mandatory measles vaccination). Ever since Enders experimented with a smear taken from a young boy named David
Edmonston who was supposedly ill from measles, the firstmodel of a measles “virus” (hypothetically put together fromparticles of dead tissue) has been called the “Edmonston
strain”. The measles vaccine, as a toxic sum of all those decayed pieces of tissue, is also claimed to contain the “Edmonston strain”. A part of that mixture containing dead monkey
tissue and foetal bovine serum is being constantly frozen andthen used regularly to “inoculate” other dying tissue/cells inorder to create “measles viruses” and “live vaccines”.

2. With respect to all “viruses” of humans, animals or plants,
however, no virus was ever isolated, photographed in an isolated form and its components were never biochemically characterised all at once, from the “isolate”. In reality, there was a consensus process, taking place over quite a number of years, inwhich single particles of dead cells were theoretically ascribedto a totally virtual virus model. The phages served as a modelfor this entire interpretation process, as we can see clearly fromthe first drawings of a “virus”.

The importance of winning the measles virus trial

3. The tissue and cells used for the “proof and propagation” of“viruses” are prepared in a very special manner before the actof the alleged “infection”. 80% of their nutrients is withdrawn,
so that they can become “hungry” and better absorb the “viruses”. They are treated with antibiotics in order to exclude thepossibility that bacteria, which are present always and everywhere in all tissues and serums, may cause the expected deathof the cells. It was acknowledged only in 1972 by biochemistry
experts that those antibiotics were damaging and killing thecells by themselves, a fact that the virologists had previously
ignored. “Starvation” and “poisoning” is what kills the cells, but
this was and still is misinterpreted as the presence, isolation,effect and propagation of the hypothetical viruses.

The background of the measles virus trial, which began in
2011, was to prevent the planned compulsory measles vaccinations. A former Federal Justice minister had called me
and asked for scientific data to help stop the introductionof mandatory vaccination. A leading senior state prosecutor gave us the idea to offer a prize for the proof of the“measles virus” and, in the subsequent civil trial, to legally
establish that there is no scientific evidence for the claims
that the measles virus exists and that vaccines were safe andeffective. Our plan was entirely successful. This is easily understandable if one knows why the paper by John Franklin
Enders et al. published on the 1st of June 1954, became theonly and exclusive basis of the entire new genetic virology of
the “live virus” vaccine production after the old virology had
died a natural death in 1951–1952.

4. The control experiments that are crucial and required in science
have to date not been carried out with respect to viruses; they
could exclude the possibility that instead of a virus just typical cell
particles were misinterpreted as a virus. The control experiments
regarding the isolation, biochemical description and electron micrographs of the phages, however, were all carried out.
Thus, Enders’ speculations dated 1 June 195420 about the possible proof of an “agent” which could “possibly” play a rolein measles became an apparently “scientific” fact and theexclusive basis for the entire new genetic virology after 1952,

The crucial expert opinions, protocols and rulings ofthe measles virus trial (2012–2017) that I will refer toin the following are freely available on the internet
www.wissenschafftplus.de/blog. Further expert opinions andrefutations of the claims regarding the measles virus, which
the Court did not take into account, are published in the editions of the WissenschafftPlus magazine from 2014 to 2017.

Knowing that the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), contrary to
its legal duty, had not published a single paper on the alleged existence of the measles virus, I offered a €100,000
prize for a scientific paper from the RKI containing the scientific evidence for the existence of the measles virus.
A young doctor from Saarland presented me with six papers
but none from the RKI; the papers were: the one from Enders
published the 1st of June 1954 and five others, based exclusively on Enders’ original paper, one of them being the most

10 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

comprehensive review of other papers on the measles virus. In
this “review” we can find a description of the laborious consensus-building process which lasted for decades and included dilemmas such as which parts of the dead tissue are to be
ascribed to the measles virus model and also how the measles
virus model had to be constantly modified.
I replied to the young doctor (who urgently recommended
me to waive the (indeed) costly “legal dispute” and to immediately pay him the prize money) that in none of the six publications was there any identifiable viral structure, but rather
easily recognisable typical cellular particles and structures.
Thereupon he filed a suit with the Ravensburg Local Court,
this however, without submitting the six publications tothe court. The Ravensburg Court decided against me, eventhough the six publications never appeared in the legal files.
Apart from that, the verdict of the Ravenburg Local Court
occurred under more than unusual circumstances.21
The plaintiff admitted to the judge during the appeal at the
Stuttgart Higher Court that he himself had never read thesix publications. So he was planning to shut me down andthus silence the central refutation of the vaccination throughthe “tedious legal battle”. He may have been a victim of thefalse belief in viruses himself, because he probably trusted
his colleagues, which is normal, but who themselves had no
idea about the erroneous development in medicine since1858 and did not do any historical research with respect totheir false beliefs, this becoming simultaneously culprits andperpetrators and victims of their fatal belief in the germ theories and their trust in vaccinations.
It is plausible that the plaintiff did not read the six publications he presented to me, but not to the court. At least it isclear that he didn’t look for them himself, because they are
the only publications in the entire field of about 30,000 technical articles about “measles” in which a reference to theaccepted existence of the measles virus is made. However,
all the tons of other papers, which nobody can ever finish
reading, assume “a priori” the existence of the measles virus
and always refer to citations of citations, which are finallyand exclusively based on the alleged “evidence” supplied byEnders on the 1st of June 1954.
The Ravensburg Local Court decided in 2014 to accept thelawsuit of Dr Bardens and concluded that the prize money
was to be paid out even without any publication from the
RKI. Apart from that, the Ravensburg Local Court decided
that it wouldn’t be necessary for the scientific evidence forthe existence of the measles virus to be published in one single paper, but rather that the overall 3,366 papers (the sum of
all the papers cited in the six submitted publications) from1954 to 2007 was to be accepted as proof.

The legally appointed expert Professor Podbielski from Rostock argued accordingly (or the local court adjusted its opening decision to the expert opinion): “I have to expressly clarify that one cannot provide evidence in the classical sense inbiology as one can in mathematics or physics. In biology one
can only gather clues, which at some point in time in their
entirety attain probative value.“22Based on this extremely unscientific claim arising from Podbielski’s lack of arguments and his bias due to the discrepancies between reality and the beliefs he had grown so fondof, something happened which behavioural scientists call“displacement”. Podbielski invented a desperate excuse,namely that biology and the medicine based thereon as wellas vaccinations are per se unscientific and without evidence,
without proof: In his opinion, only a collection of clues could“some day” and “somehow” (practically) attain probativevalue. A more explicit admission of the existent unscientificnature of current biology and medicine has never been expressed with such clarity.
What is most important at present is to make legal use of all
this evidence for the unscientific nature of the infection theory and the vaccination policies, which are already impacting
our constitutional rights. We need to make the mandatory
measles vaccination, voted upon and implemented in Germany as of 1 March 2020, simply disappear.
Further information about this will be published in our newsletter.

Continuation of this article:
1. The duty of science to carry out control experiments. The
statements given to protocol by Professor Podbielski during
the measles virus trial that all the crucial publications about
the existence of the measles virus and all subsequent publications, contrary to his expert written opinion, do not containa single control experiment.23
2. The crucial importance of the legal judgment from the
Stuttgart Upper State Court from 16/02/2016, Article 12 U
63/15 for virology and vaccination policies.24
3. Reports and advice on what has already been done in order to reverse the mandatory measles vaccination law.
will follow in the next WissenschafftPlus edition 2/2020.

11 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

List of sources
1
The Nobel Prize is for many reasons the most embarrassing
thing that can happen to a scientist and to society:
1. All recognition is based on the respective “dominantopinion” of the academic orthodoxy and its claim to exclusiveness.
2. All such recognitions have proved to be wrong after ashort period ranging from several years to several decades.
Thus, the Nobel Prize impedes the advancement of scientific knowledge by turning mere assertions into dogmas.
3. A small number of extremely elitist people having left therealm of reality, are ultimately in charge of deciding what isscience and what is not science. These people predefine “scientific” fashions and methods and suppress any knowledge
that contradicts their views. The practice of “Peer-Review”,
that is, the evaluation of scientific papers prior to their publication, prevents that any undesired piece of knowledge refuting their ideas and dogmas ends up being published. For
further information read the report about the Nobel Prizein the magazine WissenschafftPlus Nr. 1/2017. The report
includes the picture of a sculpture showing the essence of
this issue and speaking louder than any words.

2
The members of the Libertas&Sanitas association, in theireffort to stop mandatory vaccination, have published comprehensive documentation about the knowledge available
to the decision-makers in the health authorities. In that way
it has been proved that there is no data available in Germany that leads to the conclusion that vaccines are safe andthat vaccination only entails a small risk. Furthermore: In
Germany there is no collection of data that helps verify if,following the WHO definitons, there was a propagation or
epidemic of measles or a stop to that propagation throughvaccines for that matter. See: www.libertas-sanitas.de. I
also recommend the remarkable video “Verstand&Logik im
Gespräch mit Priorix (Masern-Mumps-Röteln-Lebendimpfstoff) [2020]” (English: “ Mind&Logic in conversation with
Priorix (measles – mumps – rubella – attenuated vaccine)[2020]”).

3
Those fluent in English will realize by reading the following publication that the construction of a complete viralgenome is just something purely theoretical: Complete
Genome Sequence of a Wild-Type Measles Virus Isolated
during the Spring 2013 Epidemic in Germany“, to be foundhere: https:// edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/1876. The RobertKoch Institute was involved in this research. Prof. Mankertz,
co-author of the publication and head of the National Reference Institute for Measles, Mumps and Rubella, claimed
upon request that control experiments were carried out forthis study in order to rule out that typical cell components
were misinterpreted as viral particles. She refused however to release the documentation concerning these control
experiments. During the appeal Prof. Mankertz replied thatshe did not have the control experiments available, but she
was sure that her colleagues in Munich should have carriedout and documented such experiments. I personally wrote
to all authors and to their laboratory managers asking forthe control experiments, which are an obligation since 1998.

No one answered. The rectors of the contacted research institutes did not answer my questions either and so the appeal procedure came to nothing.
Publication of 22.1.2020: Homologous recombination within the spike glycoprotein of the newly identified coronavirus
may boost cross‐species transmission from snake to human.
Authors: Wei Ji, Wei Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Junjie Zai, Xingguang Li. To be found in this link: https://doi.org/10.1002/
jmv.25682

4For further information read the pages 33-36 of the article„Eine neue Sichtweise auf das Leben - Teil II.“ (English: “A
new perspective on life – Part II”), WissenschafftPlus magazine Nr. 2/2019. In this article it is explained how almost
any form of academic and state financed science will automatically follow an erroneous trend. The legal historian andsociologist Eugen Rosenstock already showed this in 1956,
specifically naming the then already refuted theory of infection and cancer medicine.

5

Karlheinz Lüdtke: Zur Geschichte der frühen Virusforschung. Wie sich mit technischen Fortschritten bei der
Untersuchung „filtrierbarer“ infektiöser Agenzien das Verständnis der Virusnatur entwickelt hatte. (English: On thehistory of early virus research. How technical progress in
the investigation of “filterable” infectious agents developed
the understanding of the nature of viruses). Reprint Nr.
125 (1999) of the “Max-Planck-Instituts für Wissenschaftsgeschichte” (Max-Planck-Institute for the history of science), 89 pages.

6

On the refutation of all previous ideas about a so-called
genetic material as building and function plan of life, you
can refer to my articles in the WissenchafftPlus magazine.
The index for all published editions since 2003 is available
on the internet. Particularly worth reading is the article “Erbgut in Auflösung”, published in “DIE ZEIT” on 12.6.2008(English: Genome in dissolution) that is available on the internet for free. This article summarizes that the “genome”
is constantly changing, therefore it cannot carry out thethings that scientists ascribe to genomes and also that itschanges are misinterpreted as disease genes.

7

A good insight into the work and system of knowledge ofProf. Günter Enderlein can be found in the doctoral tesis
written by Dr. Elke Krämer „Leben und Werk von Prof. Dr.
phil.
Günther Enderlein (1872- 1968)“ (English: Life and work ofProf. Dr. phil. Günther Enderlein (1872- 1968), published asa book in 2012 by Reichl Verlag in St. Goar.

8

Riesenviren und die Entstehung des Lebens (English: Giantviruses and the origin of life). WissenschafftPlus Nr. 1/2014.

910
Wasser begreifen, Leben erkennen. PI-Wasser: Mehr als
nur energetisiertes H2O. (English: Understanding water, perceiving life. Pi-water: More than just energized H2O), WissenschafftPlus Nr. 6/2018. This contribution can be found on our
webpage www.wissenschafftplus.de under “important texts”.

12 WISSENSCHAFFTPLUS magazin 01/2020 · Auszug

11

See the introduction to a new perspective on life in issues
Nr. 1, 2 and 3 /2019 of WissenschafftPlus.

deported or imprisoned, did the theory of infection turninto a mainstream globally accepted theory.

Comprehensive presentation of the measles virus trial: go
Virus go. Der Bundesgerichtshof lässt den Glauben an Viren
untergehen (English: go virus go. The Federal Court lets thebelief in viruses go down). WissenschafftPlus Nr. 2/2017.
Also free on the internet: wissenschafftplus.de.

18
See the English version of the Wikipedia article about John
Franklin Enders.

12

As an introduction to the findings and solution proposals of Silvio Gesell to escape from the autonomous mechanisms of the monetary system, you can read the book „Wer
hat Angst vor Silvio Gesell “ (English: Who fears Silvio Gesell) written by Hermann Benjes (292 pages).

19
The First Measles Virus. Jeffrey P. Baker. Veröffentlicht im
Magazin Pediatrics, September 2011, 128 (3) 435-437; DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1430

13

14
Ivan Illich. Die Nemesis der Medizin: Die Kritik derMedikalisierung des Lebens. (English: Ivan Illich. The nemesis of medicine: criticism on the medicalization of life) 319
pages, 1976 and 1995.

In his book „Can Medicine be cured? The corruption of aprofession “, the author Seamus O‘Mahony, a famous Irish
gastroenterologist, distorts the writings of Ivan Illich. Illich
states that his diagnosis on the perversion of medicine has
as its “only” cause the internal dynamics resulting from theprofit-making compulsion, being the pharmaceutical industry one more player in that system. O‘Mahony on the other
hand blames the pharmaceutical industry for the corruption of the medical professions and concludes that medicine cannot be cured. According to him, medicine on its
own would not be able to get rid of that perversion and only
a humanitarian catastrophe or a war would make a reset
possible. In this way he overlooks the misconception thatoriginated in 1858 due to Virchow: The incorrect and, evenat that time, baseless cellular pathology theory that was the
direct precursor of the, later developed but equally wrong
and dangerous, theories about infection, the immune system, genes and cancer. On page 262 of his book, the author
acknowledges that there was another school of medicine
that understood health as a result of life being in harmony
with itself and with its environment but that this school had
no chance. He was referring to the “psychosomatic” of Prof.
Claus Bahne Bahnson and his international colleagues.
They did not make much progress though, stuck as they
were in the false biochemistry of the cell theory. Only Dr.
Ryke Geerd Hamer managed to develop a scientific, comprehensive and individualized psychosomatic theory.
15

Rudolf Virchow, ein Stratege der Macht. Teil 1 und Teil 2.
(English: Rudolf Virchow, a strategist of power. Part 1 andpart 2) Siegfried Johann Mohr. WissenschafftPlus Nr. 5/2015
and Nr. 6/2015 and Entwicklung von Medizin und Menschheit. (English: Development of medicine and mankind)
Stefan Lanka. WissenschafftPlus Nr. 6/2015.

16

17
Annette Hinz-Wessels. Das Robert Koch-Institut im Nationalsozialismus (English: The Robert Koch Institute under
National Socialism). Kulturverlag Kadmos, 192 pages, 2012.
The book points out that only after the German scientists
opposing and refuting the theory of infection were killed,

20
Propagation in Tissue Cultures of Cytopathogenic Agentsfrom Patients with Measles. John F. Enders and Thomas C.
Peebles. Im Magazin „Proceedings of the Society for Experimental
Biology and Medicine“, Vol. 86, Issue 2 vom 1.6.1954, Seite
277-286. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-86-21073

21

See 12.

22
Protocol of the trial of 12.3.2015 before the Ravensburg Local Court, page 7 lower section. See www.wissenschafftplus.
de/blog/de23
Protocol of the trial of 12.3.2015 before the Ravensburg Local Court, page 7 upper section. See www.wissenschafftplus.
de/blog/deTo be found here http://lrbw.juris.de or here en
www.wissenschafftplus.de/blog/de24

Table Water Filter System100%
frei vonWeichmachern
free ofplasticizers

Die MAUNAWAI® Kanne macht aus jedem Leitungswasser ein Wasser wie aus unberührten Bergquellen. Sie erhalten bestes schadstofffreies und lebendiges Wasser, welches unserem Zellwasser sehrähnlich ist und deshalb vom Körper optimal aufgenommen und verwendet werden kann.
Die Maunawai® Kanne Kini wird aus hochwertigem, lebensmittelechtem Kunststoff in Deutschland produziert und geprüft.
The MAUNAWAI® jug turns every tap water into a water fresh outof virgin mountain springs. What you get is the best pollutant-freeand vital water, which is very similar to your cell water and thus
can be absorbed and used by your body in an optimal way.
The jug is easy to use. Fill the upper tank with tap water, the waterruns in a few minutes through the PI filter cartridge and is immediately ready to drink.

Information MAUNAWAI GmbH
Tel.: +49 3327 570880 · info@maunawai.com · www.maunawai.com

Abonnieren Sie jährlich 4 Ausgaben
desmagazins: