Criteria for reviewing proposals and allocation of points for items to be reviewed
Items to be reviewed (basic points, additional points)

1. Purpose, contents and implementation method of the project (35 points)
1.1 Project purpose (total 5 points: 5 basic points and 0 additional points)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not the Project purpose corresponds to the project purpose
described in the “Guidelines for applying”.
1.2 Contents of the project and applicability to countermeasures for decommissioning (includingapplicability to the work site) (total 15 points: 5 basic points and 5 additional points each)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not the contents of the project are consistent with the Projectcontent indicated by the “Guidelines for applying”, and described in detail in consideration of
applicability to countermeasures for decommissioning (including applicability to the work site).
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the proposal contains the experiment conditions
and development specifications have been fully considered to meet requirements when thedecommissioning works will be implemented, and project milestones have been established clearlyand set by numerical values
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the proposal contains contents which aremeaningful for this project other than the contents stipulated in the “Guidelines for applying” (novelty,originality and effectiveness).
1.3 Implementation method of the project (total 15 points: 5 basic points and 5 additional points each)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not the implementation method of the project is consistent
with the purpose and contents of the project.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the implementation method of the project isconsidered in detail, and whether or not the method is effective, purposeful and feasible. Moreover,whether or not the proposal is creative.
Criterion for the additional points: Specifically, whether or not the proposal contains the concrete
method to take into account gathering domestic and overseas wisdom and human resource
development.
2. Project implementation schedule (15 points)
2.1 Project implementation schedule (total 15 points: 5 basic points and 5 additional points each)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not an appropriate project implementation schedule isindicated for the purpose and contents of the project.

1

Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the project implementation schedule shows thegrounds for implementing the project appropriately (procedure(s), etc.) and to start the project
promptly after grant decision.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the procedure for implementing the projectcontains creativity to implement the project effectively.
3. Project implementation scheme (35 points)
3.1 Project implementation scheme, division of roles (total 15 points: 2.5 basic points each and 2
additional points each)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not the project implementation scheme, division of roles(including the project leader) and the number of staff are clearly described.
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not staffing is sufficient to implement the project.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the project implementation scheme is properly
arranged to respond to requests, instructions and advice from Ministry of Economy, Trade andIndustry and the management office promptly and flexibly.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the project implementation scheme has theimplementation ability and the coordination structure to consider/judge the applicability tocountermeasures for decommissioning (including applicability to the work site), and has establisheda research and development system in line with TEPCO’s project management.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not the proposal contains contributions to therevitalization of Fukushima by utilizing local companies in Fukushima-Prefecture.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not it is described that the applicant makes
contributions to the revitalizing local economy through the implementation of the project such as
working with companies which run business in the area Hamadori, Fukushima-Prefecture
revitalization through this project.
3.2 Expertise as an organization, track record of other similar projects (total 10 points: 5 basic points
and additional points [1] 1point, [2] 2 points, [3] 2 points)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not it is described that the applicant has an accumulationof indispensable expert knowledge, know-how etc. to implement the project as an organization.
Criterion for the additional points [1]: Whether or not the applicant has ever implemented othersimilar projects as an organization.
Criterion for the additional points [2]: Whether or not the applicant has an accumulation of technicalknowledge or expert knowledge concerning the contents of the project as an organization.
Criterion for the additional points [3]: Whether or not the applicant has experiences of implementing
projects which can contribute to implementing this project, and/or a network with specializedorganizations useful to implementing this project as an organization.

2

3.3 Expertise and experiences of similar projects of engaged employees (total 10 points: 5 basic points
and additional points [1] 1point, [2] 2 points, [3] 2 points respectively)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not it is described that employees to be engaged in theproject have an accumulation of indispensable expert knowledge, know-how etc. to implement theproject.
Criterion for the additional points [1]: Whether or not employees to be engaged in the project haveever implemented other similar projects.
Criterion for the additional points [2]: Whether or not employees to be engaged in the project have anaccumulation of technical knowledge or expert knowledge concerning the contents of the project.
Criterion for the additional point [3]: Whether or not employees to be engaged in the project haveexperiences of implementing projects which can contribute to implementing this project, and/or a
network with specialized organizations useful to implementing this project.
4. Labor and Project costs (total 10 points: 5 basic points and 5 additional points respectively)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not labor and project costs are appropriately allocated tothe project purpose and contents.
Criterion for the additional points: Whether or not labor and project costs are allocated as
appropriately as possible.
5. Financial basis and management structure (total 5 points: 2.5 basic points each and 0 additionalpoints)
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not the applicant has a financial basis for implementationof the project (Whether or not it has an organization to organize and store evidence documents forexpenditures.).
Criterion for the basic points: Whether or not it can be confirmed that the applicant can proceed withsecure accounting procedures as a subsidized entity for the project implementation.
Point rating method
・Point rating method : For the basic points, whether each item is satisfied or not will be evaluatedon two choice “〇”(Satisfied) or “×”(Not Satisfied). For the additional points, each item to be evaluatedwill be ranked three choices “〇: to meet the requirements of additional points sufficiently (×1)” or“△: to meet the requirements of additional points (×0.5)” or “×: no additional points (×0)”.
・The full points are 100. The basic points are 45, and the additional points are 55.
・However, a proposal shall not be adopted unless the basic score reaches at least 45.

3