アジアの先端研究ネットワ ク
アジアの先端研究ネットワーク
における最近の課題
後藤 滋樹
早稲田大学

APANの動機
１９９６年３月 筑波
The necessity for high‐end Internet forg
wasresearchers in Asia Pacific region
recognized at APEC Symposium in Tsukuba,
Japan in March 1996, and then Asia Pacific
Advanceddd (APAN)() was proposedd at APII
Test‐bed Forum in Seoul, Korea in June1996.
1996
http://www.apan.net/home/aboutapan/APAN.php※ 会場：筑波第一ホテル,
現在 オ ク フロンティアホテル
現在のオークラホつくば
くば2

APANの動機（２）ＡＰＡＮ以前のアジア太平洋の状況（模式図）
以前のアジア太平洋の状況（模式図）

模式図

欧州域内のネットワーク
NSF ICM
International Connections Manager

あたかも米国がアジアのハブである3現在のAPAN

日米間の黄色の回線がAPANの発端となったTransPAC

4

APAN New Delhi Meetingg
22—26, AUG, 2011
会合案内： http://www.apan.net/meetings/India2011/
http://www apan net/meetings/India2011/

プログラム： http://www.apan.net/meetings/India2011/schedule.php

5Future Internet Testbed WG
Chairman : James G. Williams, Shinji Shimojo
9000‐9010 Welcoming remark (Shinji Shimojo)
0910‐1040 Session 1: FIT update, Chair: DY Kim
1.1 GENI: Now going live across the US ‐ Chip Elliot, GENI ( Remote )1.2 Internet2's Network Development and Deployment Initiative (NDDI): A Large
Scale Facility for Software Defined Network Development and Deployment ‐Robert P Vietzke,, Internet2 ( Remote )1.3 Network Virtualization Research in Japan ‐ Aki Nakao, Japan ( Remote )Break1100‐1230 Session 2: FIT update 2, Chair: Shinji Shimojo
2.1 Update
don theh FI Testbed
b d Activities in Korea, ‐ SunHee Yang, ETRI ( Remote )2.2 MyFIRE ‐ Increasing role of testbeds for research exploitation, ‐ A Paventhan((ERNET))
2.3 Future Internet Testbed and Multi‐Domain OpenFlow Management in
TWAREN ‐ Te‐Lung Liu, NCHC, NARL ( Remote ) Slides
6Lunch1400‐1530 Session 3: OpenFlow Deployments, Chair: Eiji Kawai
3.1 Programmable Network Platform of activity in Industry ‐ YoshihikoKanaumi
3 2 Researcher Infrastructure to Support FIT in Thailand and Recent Activities
3.2‐ Chalermpol Charnsripinyo
3.3 OFELIA‐Pan‐European OpenFlow Testbed ‐ Dr. Hagen Woesner
3.4 OpenFlow@Korea: Linking OpenFlow Activities in Korea, ‐ JongWon Kim(GIST, Korea)
Break
1600‐1730 OpenFlow Hands‐On Workshop, Chair: Shinji Shimojo
4.1 Open and Programmable Networks" ‐ Rajesh Kumar (Juniper)
4.2 Trema: A brief introduction and tutorial ‐ Shuji Ishii, Eiji Kawai (NICT)
7

Asia Future Internet Forum

http://www.asiafi.net/
8

Network Research Workshop
Opening (9:00~9:10) by APAN‐NRW Chair (JongWon Kim, GIST, Korea)
Session #1 (9:10~10:40): Programmable Networking(S i Chair:(Session
Ch i Eiji Kawai,Ki NiCT,NiCT Japan)
J)
1.1 "Planning and Implantation of NetFPGA Platform on Network Emulation
Testbed," ‐ Pang‐Weig
Tsai et al. ((National Chengg Kungg Univ., Taiwan))
1.2 "Toward Service‐aware Flow Visualization over OpenFlow‐based
Programmable Networks," ‐ Sungho Shin et al. (GIST, Korea).
1 3 "Wider
1.3"Wid Ad
Adaptationt ti andd Enhancement
E ht off OpenFlow,"
OFl " ‐ Othman
OthOthOthman
MM.
M. et al. (Kyushu Univ., Japan).
1.4 "Distant Location Selection Usingg Genetic Algorithm
gfor Live Migrationg
Method in OpenFlow Networks," ‐ Heru Sukoco et al. (Kyushu Univ., Japan).
1.5 "Scheme of Resource Optimization using VM Migration for Federated
Cloud " ‐ Yanjue Xu et al.
Cloud,al (Tokyo Univ,Univ Japan).
Japan)

9

Session #2 (11:00~12:30): Network Security and Mobility(Session Chair: Koji Okamura
Okamura, Kyushu Univ
Univ., Japan)
2.1 "The Design and Implementation of the Defender Cloud on TWAREN
Backbone," ‐ Ming‐Chang Liang et al. (National Center for High‐performanceComputing, Taiwan).
)
2.2 "Analysis of Redirection Caused by Web‐based Malware," ‐ Yuta Takata((Waseda Univ.,, Japan)p ) et al.
2.3 "LISP Mapping Resolution Impacts on Initiating Bidirectional End‐to‐EndCommunications," ‐ Motoyuki Ohmori (Chikushi Jogakuen Univ., Japan) et al.
2.4 "Implementation"li off IEEE 802.21 basedb d Mediadi IndependentddHandoverdServices," ‐ Ankith Agarwal et al. (Hyderabad, India).
2.5 "Experiencespwith SeaMo: A Vertical Handoff Implementation
pfor
Heterogeneous Wireless Networks," ‐ Seema K. et al. (Indian Institute ofScience, India).

10

Session #3 (14:00~15:30): Green Sensor Networking(Session Chair: Wang‐Cheol Song, Jeju Univ., Korea)
3 1 "Effect
3.1"Eff off Selfish
S lfi h Behavior
B h i on PowerPConsumption
Ci ini Mobile
M bil Ad hochNetwork," ‐ Hemang Kothari, Manish Chaturvedi (Nirma Univ, India).
3.2 "CAP ((Coordinated AdaptivepPower)) ManagementgTechniqueq with
Adaptive Threshold Policy for Wireless Sensor Nodes," ‐ Gauri Joshi,
Prabhat Ranjan (DAIICT, India).
3 3 "6PANview:
3.3
6PANview: A network monitoring system for the "Internet
Internet of ThingsThings"," ‐Lohith Y. S. et al. (Indian Institute of Science, India).
3.4 "Single Inventory Cycled Data Population in LEACH Cluster," ‐ Chandan
Maity et al. (C‐DAC Noida, India).
Session #4 (16:00~17:30): Miscellaneous Topics(Session Chair: Kitamura Yasuichi,Yasuichi NiCT,NiCT Japan)
4.1 "The Earth System Grid Federation: Delivering globally accessiblepetascale data for CMIP5," ‐ Dean N. Williams (Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, USA) et al.
4.2 "An Efficient Alarm Notification Algorithm for Earthquake Early Warning
System," ‐ TingYun Chi (National Taiwan Univ., Taiwan) et al
System,4.3 "Deploying GPU‐based Real‐time DXT compression for Networked VisualSharing," ‐ Namgon L. Kim et al. (GIST, Korea).

11

Proceedings of APAN

http://usymposia.upm.my/index.php/APAN_Proceedings/31st_APAN/schedConf/presentations

12

Network Engineering Workshop
Organizing Co
Co‐chairs:chairs: Konishi (JP),(JP) Li (CN)(CN), Morgan (AU),(AU) Williams (US)
9:00‐10:30 NREN updates (chair: Brent Sweeny)#1‐1#1
1 Won‐hyuk
Won hyuk Lee <livezone(AT)kisti.re.kr>, KREONET Updates#1‐2 Heechang JUNG <heechang(AT)nia.or.kr>, KOREN Updates#1‐3 Kenichiro Minomo <minomo(AT)nii.ac.jp>,
SINET4 andd theh GreatGEast
E JapanJEarthquake
E hk#1‐4 Dipak Singh <deepak(AT)eis.ernet.in>,
NKN and ERNET and how the venue for APAN is connected#1‐5 Kotaro Kataoka <kotaro(AT)wide.ad.jp>,
Post‐disaster Recovery Internet and DISANET Project
11:00‐12:30
1100 12 30 Advanced Network Technologies (Chair:(Ch i BBruce Morgan)M)#2‐1 Koji OKAMURA <oka(AT)ec.kyushu‐u.ac.jp>,
IPv6 Traffic data of Kyushu University on World IPv6 Day#2‐2 Peng JIANG <pe‐jiang(AT)kddilabs.jp>,
Multi‐vendor and Multi‐homing LISP Deployment#2‐3#2
3 Youichiro Tahara <tahara(AT)ote.kddi.com>,<tahara(AT)ote kddi com>
Lessons Learned from LISP network migration#2‐4 Xing Li <xing(AT)cernet.edu.cn>, IPv6 Transition, When and How?

13Lunch
14:00‐15:30 Performance
P f&MMeasurement (Chair: Xing Li)#3‐1 Alan Whinery <whinery(AT)hawaii.edu>, Measurement Infrastructurewith SXTransport/Translight/Pacific Wave
#3‐2 Bruce Morgan <Bruce.Morgan(AT)aarnet.edu.au>, AARNET
Measurement Infrastructure#3‐3 Takatoshi Ikeda <tk‐ikeda(AT)kddilabs.jp>, Toward the greater use ofperfSONAR and measurement tools#3‐4#34 John Hicks <jhicks(AT)iu.edu>,jhicks(AT)iu.edu , TP3/ACE project status update#3‐5 Wenshui Chen <chenws(AT)twgrid.org>, LHCOPNE Activity
16:00‐17:30 International Collaborations (Chair: Jaehwa Lee)
#4‐1 Kwangjong Cho <kjcho(AT)kisti.re.kr>, KREONET New Services#4‐2 Jin Tanaka <tanaka(AT)ote.kddi.com> and Katsuyuki Hasebe<hasebe(AT)nict.go.jp>, New DCN in JGN‐X#4‐3#4
3 Brent Sweeny <sweeny(AT)indiana.edu>,sweeny(AT)indiana.edu , New Transpac3 service & Cisco
Telepresence#4‐4 David West <David.West(AT)dante.net>, Update on DANTE projects

14

APAN members
Primary Members
AARNet ((AU),) APAN‐CN, APAN‐JP, APAN‐TH,ANF (KR), APAN‐TW, ASTI (PH), HARNET (HK),LEARN ((LK),), NACESTI ((VN),), REANNZ ((NZ),),SingAREN (SG), NREN, APAN‐MY, PERN (PK), ERNET (IN).

Associate Members
ITB, TransPac/Indiana U., Pacific Wave.

Affiliate Members
ACFA, APBioNet, APNIC, APNG, APRU, CGIAR, APAN‐BD,IDRC PRAGMA,IDRC,PRAGMA National Grid Office (SG)(SG), NIIT,
NIIT SDLEARN.
SDLEARN

Liaison Members
CANARIE DANTECANARIE,DANTE, TERENA,
TERENA Internet2,Internet2 CLARA.
CLARA
15

ＴＥＩＮ
欧州の資金、現在はＴＥＩＮ３、来年からＴＥＩＮ４

April, 2011
http://www.tein3.net/server/show/nav.2212
April, 2010
16

ＴＥＩＮの運営• 最初のＴＥＩＮ（１）は韓国とフランスを接続
最初の（ ）は韓国と ラン を接続
韓国 金大中 大統領時代
欧州

韓国

APII

日本

米国

• LinkingLi ki Asia
A i Pacific
ifi to Europe andd beyondbd
最初の欧州からの接続点の候補は
マレーシア
17

Beneficiary と Non‐beneficiary• 巧みな欧州の資金活用
beneficiary 欧州資金 80%,80% 現地国 20% （TEIN3）
欧州資金 50%, 現地国 50% (TEIN4)
non‐beneficiary もパートナー（名称はともかく）• 資金100%の援助が必ずしも歓迎されない現実
20% の現地負担には苦労するが決定後は安定• 長期的な視点 vs. 短期的な視点
beneficiaryとしては現在の資金はありがたい「大きな財布」効果
欧州資金がなくなっても全体がゼロにならない
18

ＴＥＩＮ４をめぐる議論
議• ＴＥＩＮを運営する組織
ＴＥＩＮ３はＤＡＮＴＥ（欧州）ＴＥＩＮ４はアジア太平洋に委ねる予定• 候補となった３つの案
APAN
AARNet （オーストラリア）
TEIN*CC （韓国提案）

19

TEIN*CC
TEIN
CCの準備状況• ASEMにおいて国際的なendorseを得た• 法的には韓国の国内団体（registration済）←Steering Committee

Executive Officer: Dr Byung Kyu Kim (NIA → TEIN*CC)

20

Organizedi d byb Uninet
iandd ThaiREN
h i21