KEO Discussion Paper No. 115

On Measuring the Productivity andthe Standard of Living in Japan, 1955-2006

W. Erwin Diewert,
Hideyuki Mizobuchi,
andKoji Nomura†

February 2009

Abstract
The paper looks at the contribution of the market sector to changes in Japan's living
standards over the years 1955-2006. It considers real income as a measure for living
standards and decomposes its growth rate into three components: components due tochanges in productivity, in real output prices (including changes in the terms of trade) and inprimary input growth. The exact index number approach developed by Diewert andMorrison (1986) and Kohli (1990) (2004) is adapted to this real income context. Finally, thepaper switches from a gross output concept to a theoretically preferred net output concept.
In the net output context, it turns out that the role of capital deepening as a contributor tohigher living standards diminishes and the role of productivity and labour growth becomes
more important.

†

The first author is at the Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada andthe last two authors are at Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................. 1
2. The Theoretical Framework .................................................................................................................... 3
3. Data Construction ................................................................................................................................. 11
3.1 The Definition of the Market Sector .............................................................................................. 11
3.2 The Database for Inputs and Outputs ............................................................................................. 12
3.3 User Costs and Real Rates of Return ............................................................................................. 14
4. Results................................................................................................................................................... 16
4.1 Japanese Productivity Growth: A Conventional Approach ............................................................ 16
4.2 The Decomposition of Deflated GDP Growth ............................................................................... 18
4.3 The Decomposition of Deflated NDP Growth ............................................................................... 20
5. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 26
Appendix A. Data Construction ............................................................................................................... 28
Appendix B. Tables of Prices, Quantities, and Value for Inputs and Outputs .......................................... 48
References................................................................................................................................................. 50

Tables and Figure
Table 1: List of Capital Services, Inventory Services, and Land Services ............................................... 13
Table 2: Chained Fisher Indexes of Output, Input and Productivity Growth and the Balancing Real Rateof Return in the Japanese Economy, 1956-2006. ........................................................................... 17
Table 3: The Decomposition of Market Sector Real Income Growth into Translog Productivity, Real
Output Price Change and Input Quantity Contribution Factors ..................................................... 18
Table 4: The Decomposition of Market Sector Real Income Level into Cumulative Productivity, Real
Output Price Change and Input Quantity Contribution Factors ..................................................... 20
Table 5: The Quantity and Price of Gross Investment, Depreciation, Net Investment, Capital Services,
Waiting Capital Services (Billion Yen) ......................................................................................... 23
Table 6: The Decomposition of Market Sector Net Real Income Growth into Translog Productivity, Real
Output Price Change, and Input Quantity Contribution Factors .................................................... 24
Table 7: The Decomposition of Market Sector Net Real Income Cumulative Growth into Productivity,
Real Output Price Change, and Input Quantity Contribution Factors using the Translog Net
Product Approach .......................................................................................................................... 25
Table B- 1: Market Sector Output and Input Prices for Japan 1955-2006 ................................................ 48
Table B- 2: Market Sector Output and Input Quantities for Japan 1955-2006 (Billion Yen) ................... 49
Figure 1: The Real Rate of Return for the Years 1955-2006 .................................................................... 16

On Measuring the Productivity and the Standard of Living in Japan, 1955-2006†
W. Erwin Diewert, Hideyuki Mizobuchi and Koji Nomura
February 2009
1. Introduction
The Japanese economy has experienced tremendous growth in the past half century but there has been a
pronounced slowdown for more than 10 years after the bubble economy collapsed. 1 This uniqueexperience of the post war Japanese economy has been attracting the interest of a lot of researchers.
However, most of these studies have been concerned with the growth of production and productivity of
the Japanese economy. These studies quantify the various sources of Japanese economic growth andmeasure the productive efficiency of the Japanese economy. 2
In this paper, we are primarily concerned with increases in the standard of living in the post-war
Japanese economy. In particular, we focus on the contribution of Japan’s market sector to improvements
in Japanese living standards over the period 1955-2006. We have excluded the general government
sector from our analysis because this sector may provide its outputs without charging for them or it may
sell them for prices that are not economically significant. Our analysis will rely on the assumptions ofrevenue maximizing and cost minimizing behavior, assumptions that are generally not applicable for thegovernment sector. There are other measurement difficulties associated with the government sector.
Because it is difficult to measure many outputs in the government sector, the System of National
Accounts 1993 3 (see the UN (1993)) recommends measuring the value of these difficult to measure
outputs of the general government as the cost of producing the outputs and 1993 SNA recommends
setting the price of these outputs equal to an input cost index. This is not a proper way of measuring
output from a theoretical point of view. 4 The household sector is also a producer in the SNA. In
particular, this sector produces imputed rent from owner-occupied houses. However, this is a special
type of production where productivity improvements cannot take place and so we have decided to
exclude this sector from our concept of the market production sector. Therefore, we completely net out
the general government and the household sector from our framework in order to avoid the above
mentioned difficulties.
Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is often used as a proxy for a country’s living standard. However,real GDP is a measure of the level of production and it is well known that real GDP can be a very
misleading indicator of a country’s welfare in the face of changing terms of trade. 5 Real (Gross) Income,which deflates nominal GDP by the price of domestic consumption goods is more appropriate as ameasure of economic welfare. Economic welfare comes from consumption. Real income captures how
much consumption people can purchase for their income. For example, if the nominal output is constant†

The first author is at the Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada andthe last two authors are at Keio Economic Observatory (KEO), Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
1
Although Japanese economy is in a period of economic recovery since 2002, its growth is still modest.
2
See Hayashi and Nomura (2005), Hayashi and Prescott (2002), Jorgenson and Nishimizu (1978), Jorgenson,
Kuroda, and Nishimizu (1987), Jorgenson and Nomura (2005), Nishimizu and Hulten (1978) and Nomura(2004).
3
We call it 1993 SNA hereafter.
4
There is an additional difficulty with the SNA treatment of input cost in the government sector: the user costof capital in the government sector is just depreciation with no imputation for the financial cost of capital.
Thus if a government building is sold to the private sector, GDP will increase!
5
Hamada and Iwata (1984) show that real GNP (equivalent to real GDP in our paper) may overestimate
national welfare when the terms of trade deteriorate for a country. Kohli (2004) showed that an improvementin the terms of trade can actually lead to a fall in real GDP.

1

over two consecutive periods, an improvement in the terms of trade should increase economic welfare
by enhancing the purchasing power of domestic households. Real Income always increases in thissituation. However, the conventional Laspeyres type real GDP may decrease in this case.
We shed the new light on the measurement of the standard of living in Japan for the years 1955-2006 by
focusing on the real income generated by the market sector. We attempt to measure the determinants ofreal income growth in Japan. We adapt the analytic framework for productivity measurement that wasdeveloped by Diewert and Morrison (1986) and Kohli (1990) (2004) to the real income growth context.
Adapting their results, we find that the main determinants of growth in real income generated by themarket sector of the economy are:• Technical progress or improvements in Total Factor Productivity (TFP);• Growth in nonconsumption real domestic output prices, growth in the real prices of exports andfalls in the real prices of imports; and• Growth in primary inputs.
Using our adapted decomposition formula, all of these three determinants can be calculated using only
the observable price and quantity data over the years 1955 to 2006. A difficulty in applying thisdecomposition formula is uncertainty as to what is the “correct” user cost of capital. In particular, should
an exogenous rate of return be used in the formula or should an endogenous balancing rate of return thatmakes the value of inputs equal to the value of outputs be used. Schreyer (2007) surveys several
different procedures for estimating rates of return. We use ex post balancing (real) rates of return. Thesebalancing real rates of return seem to capture business conditions in the post war Japanese economy.
GDP in a closed economy with no government is simply consumption plus gross investment pluschanges in inventory. Economists have argued for a long time that Net Domestic Product (NDP), whichequals consumption and net investment, is a more appropriate welfare measure than GDP. 6 The problem
with the gross concept is that it gives us a measure of output that is not sustainable. In order to move to amore theoretically appropriate NDP concept using our framework for the determinants of real income
growth, it is necessary to treat depreciation as an offset to gross investment. Thus we take thedepreciation term in the user cost formula out of costs and treat it as a negative output that will act as anoffset to gross investment. Our theoretical results, explaining the growth of gross real income generated
by the market sector, can still be applied to the net real income concept.
Our dataset of the market sector has been constructed from different data sources. For net output data,
we heavily depend on data in Japanese System of National Accounts. 7 For capital stocks and investment,
we also made extensive use of the investment and asset data in the KEO database. For labour input, weconstructed total hours of works for three different workers; the self-employed, family workers, andemployees from the Japanese Labour Force Survey and the Japanese national accounts. One limitationof our study must be noted and that is the fact that we have no industry detail in our data base and thus
we cannot locate the contributions of TFP growth in individual industries to the aggregate market sector
TFP growth. 8
6

See Marshall (1890), Pigou (1924), Samuelson (1961), and Weitzman (1976). More recent papers that argue
for the net product framework are Diewert and Fox (2005), Oulton (2004), and Weitzman (2003).
7
In 1978, the Japanese system of national accounts was revised to comply with the guidelines proposed by
the United Nations System of National Accounts (1968 SNA). In 2000, it was revised to comply with theguidelines newly proposed by the United Nations System of National Accounts (1993 SNA).
8
Moreover, we cannot measure the contributions to aggregate TFP growth of shifts in labour resources fromless productive sectors to more productive sectors. It comes from the aggregate nature of our labour data.
Since we consider three types of labour such as employees, the self-employed, and family workers, we can2The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we outline a framework for measuring
productivity and decomposing real income growth into several explanatory factors. This framework is anadaptation of a methodology introduced by Diewert and Morrison (1987). In section 3, we explain ourdata construction. The rate of return is endogenously determined from observed data. The procedure fordetermining the rate of return is explained there. In section 4 of the paper, we present a conventional
TFP growth accounting for the market sector of the Japanese economy for the years 1955-2006. There
have been several recent studies that do more or less the same thing so one might question the value of
yet another study of Japanese TFP growth. 9 However, all of these alternative studies cover a much
shorter period (with the exception of Nomura (2004)) and there are other significant differences. In thepresent study, we consider only the market sector of the Japanese economy where productivity
improvements are possible under current national income accounting conventions. Moreover, our focus
is not on TFP growth rates per se but rather the contribution of TFP growth to real income growth; i.e.,
the existing studies do not follow our treatment of changes in the terms of trade. In section 4.2, the grossincome methodology developed in section 2 is implemented using our Japanese market sector data basefor the years 1955-2006 and the net income methodology is implemented in section 4.3. In section 5, weconclude the paper.
2. The Theoretical Framework
In this section, we present the production theory framework which will be used in the remainder of thepaper. The main references are Diewert and Morrison (1986) and Kohli (1990).10
Initially, we assume that the market sector of the economy produces quantities of M (net) 11 outputs, y ≡[y1,...,yM], which are sold at the positive producer prices P ≡ [P1,...,PM]. We further assume that themarket sector of the economy uses positive quantities of N (primary) 12 inputs, x ≡ [x1,...,xN] which arepurchased at the positive primary input prices W ≡ [W1,...,WN]. In period t, we assume that there is afeasible set of output vectors y that can be produced by the market sector if the vector of primary inputs
x is utilized by the market sector of the economy; denote this period t production possibilities set by St.
We assume that St is a closed convex cone that exhibits a free disposal property. 13
only capture the contribution of shifts in labour resources within these three types. On the other hand, industry
price and quantity data are notoriously unreliable due to the lack of detailed surveys on gross outputs andintermediate inputs, for service industries in particular. A final reason for our use of aggregate market sector
data is that reliable breakdowns of exports and imports by industry are not available.
9
Some of the recent studies are Hayashi and Nomura (2005), Hayashi and Prescott (2002), Miyagawa, Ito andHarada (2004) and Jorgenson and Nomura (2005).
10
The theory also draws on Samuelson (1953), Diewert (1974; 133-141) (1980) (1983; 1077-1100), Fox and
Kohli (1998), Kohli (1978) (1991) (2003) (2004a) (2004b), Morrison and Diewert (1990), Samuelson (1953)
and Sato (1976). This paper is essentially an extended version of Diewert, Mizobuchi and Nomura (2005)
using newly available data. The theoretical framework explained in this section was recently used by Diewert
and Lawrence (2006).
11
If the mth commodity is an import (or other produced input) into the market sector of the economy, then thecorresponding quantity ym is indexed with a negative sign. We will follow Kohli (1978) (1991) and Woodland(1982) in assuming that imports flow through the domestic production sector and are “transformed” (perhaps
only by adding transportation, wholesaling and retailing margins) by the domestic production sector. The
recent textbook by Feenstra (2004; 76) also uses this approach.
12
Primary inputs only include labour and capital services from reproducible assets, inventories and land.
Intermediate inputs fall into the category of (net) outputs.
13
For a more explanation for the meaning of these properties, see Diewert (1973) (1974; 134), Woodland(1982) or Kohli (1978) (1991). The assumption that St is a cone means that the technology is subject to3

Given a vector of output prices P and a vector of available inputs x, we define the period t market sector
GDP function, gt(P,x), as follows: 14(1) gt(P,x) ≡ max y {P⋅y : (y,x) belongs to St} ;t = 0,1,2, ... .

Thus, market sector GDP depends on t (which represents the period t technology set St), on the vector of
output prices P that the market sector faces and on x, the vector of inputs that is available to the market
sector.
If Pt is the period t output price vector and xt is the vector of inputs used by the market sector during
period t and if the GDP function is differentiable with respect to the components of P at the point xt, thenthe period t vector of market sector outputs yt will be equal to the vector of first order partial derivativesof gt(Pt,xt) with respect to the components of P; i.e., we will have the following equations for each periodt: 15(2) yt = ∇P gt(Pt,xt) ;t = 0,1,2, ... .

If the GDP function is differentiable with respect to the components of x at the point Pt, then the period t
vector of input prices Wt will be equal to the vector of first order partial derivatives of gt(Pt,xt) withrespect to the components of x; i.e., we will have the following equations for each period t: 16(3) Wt = ∇x gt(Pt,xt) ;t = 0,1,2, ... .

The constant return to scale assumption on the technology sets St implies that the value of outputs will
equal the value of inputs in period t; i.e., we have the following relationships:(4) gt(Pt,xt) = Pt⋅yt = Wt⋅xt ;t = 0,1,2, ... .

The above material will be useful in what follows. However, our focus is not on GDP; instead, our focus
is on the income generated by the market sector or more precisely, on the real income generated by themarket sector. However, since market sector GDP (the value of market sector production) is distributed
to the factors of production used by the market sector, nominal market sector GDP will be equal tonominal income of the market sector. As an approximate welfare measure that can be associated withconstant returns to scale. This is an important assumption since it implies that the value of outputs should
equal the value of inputs in equilibrium. In our empirical work, we use an ex post rate of return in our user
costs of capital, which forces the value of inputs to equal the value of outputs for each period. The function gt
is known as the GDP function or the national product function in the international trade literature (see Kohli(1978)(1991), Woodland (1982) and Feenstra (2004; 76). It was introduced into the economics literature by
Samuelson (1953). Alternative terms for this function include: (i) the gross profit function; see Gorman(1968); (ii) the restricted profit function; see Lau (1976) and McFadden (1978); and (iii) the variable profit
function; see Diewert (1973) (1974) (1993).
14
The function gt(P,x) will be linearly homogeneous and convex in the components of P and linearlyhomogeneous and concave in the components of x; see Diewert (1973) (1974; 136). Notation: P⋅y ≡ ∑m=1M
Pmym.
15
These relationships are due to Hotelling (1932; 594). Note that ∇P gt(Pt,xt) ≡t t t[∂g (P ,x )/∂P1, ...,∂gt(Pt,xt)/∂PM].
16
These relationships are due to Samuelson (1953) and Diewert (1974; 140). Note that ∇xgt(Pt,xt) ≡[∂gt(Pt,xt)/∂x1, ...,∂gt(Pt,xt)/∂xN].

4

market sector, 17 we will choose to measure the real income generated by the market sector in period t interms of the number of consumption bundles that the nominal income could purchase in period t.
Therefore, we define ρt as follows:(5) ρt ≡ Wt⋅xt/PCt ;= wt⋅xt= pt⋅yt= gt(pt,xt)

t = 0,1,2, ...

where PCt > 0 is the period t consumption expenditures deflator and the market sector period t real
output price pt and real input price wt vectors are defined as the corresponding nominal price vectors
deflated by the consumption expenditures price index; i.e., we have the following definitions: 18(6) pt ≡ Pt/PCt ; wt ≡ Wt/PCt ;t = 0,1,2, ... .

The first and last equality in (5) imply that period t real income, ρt, is equal to the period t GDP function,
evaluated at the period t real output price vector pt and the period t input vector xt, gt(pt,xt). Thus thegrowth in real income over time can be explained by three main factor; productivity growth, growth inreal output prices and the growth of primary inputs. We will shortly give formal definitions for thesethree growth factors.
Using the linear homogeneity properties of the GDP functions gt(P,x) in P and x separately, we can showthat the following counterparts to the relations (2) and (3) hold using the deflated prices p and w: 19(7) yt = ∇p gt(pt,xt) ;(8) wt = ∇x gt(pt,xt) ;t = 0,1,2, ...
t = 0,1,2, ... .

Now we are ready to define a family of period t productivity growth factors τ(p,x,t):(9) τ(p,x,t) ≡ gt(p,x)/gt−1(p,x) ;t = 1,2, ... .

Thus, τ(p,x,t) measures the proportional change in the real income produced by the market sector that is
induced by the technical change going from period t – 1 to t, facing the reference real output prices p andusing reference input quantities x. We can choose the reference vectors for the measure of technicalprogress defined by (9) from the current year or the previous year: a Laspeyres type measure τLt that17

Since some of the primary inputs used by the market sector can be owned by foreigners, our measure ofdomestic welfare generated by the market sector is only an approximate one. Moreover, our suggested welfare
measure is not sensitive to the distribution of the income that is generated by the market sector.
18
Our approach is similar to the approach advocated by Kohli (2004b; 92), except he essentially deflates
nominal GDP by the domestic expenditures deflator rather than just the domestic (household) expenditures
deflator; i.e., he deflates by the deflator for C+G+I, whereas we suggest deflating by the deflator for C.
Another difference in his approach compared to the present approach is that we restrict our analysis to themarket sector GDP, whereas Kohli deflates all of GDP (probably due to data limitations). Our treatment of thebalance of trade surplus or deficit is also different.
19
If producers in the market sector of the economy are solving the profit maximization problem that is
associated with gt(P,x), which uses the original output prices P, then they equivalently solve the profit
maximization problem that is associated with gt(p,x), which uses the normalized output prices p ≡P/PC; i.e.,
Therefore, their behaviour can be described by using either gt(P,x) or gt(p,x).

5

chooses the period t−1 reference vectors pt−1 and xt−1 and a Paasche type measure τPt that chooses theperiod t reference vectors pt and xt:(10) τLt ≡ τ(pt−1,xt−1,t) = gt(pt−1,xt−1)/gt−1(pt−1,xt−1) ;(11) τPt ≡ τ(pt,xt,t) = gt(pt,xt)/gt−1(pt,xt) ;t = 1,2, ... ;t = 1,2, ... .

Since both measures of technical progress are equally valid, it is natural to average them to obtain an
overall measure of productivity growth. If we want to treat the two measures in a symmetric manner andwe want the measure to satisfy the time reversal property from index number theory 20 (so that theestimate going backwards is equal to the reciprocal of the estimate going forwards), then the geometricmean will be the best simple average to take. 21 Thus we define the geometric mean of (10) and (11) as
follows: 22(12) τt ≡ [τLt τPt]1/2 ;t = 1,2, ... .

At this point, it is not clear how we will obtain empirical estimates for the theoretical productivity
growth indexes defined by (10)-(12). One obvious way would be to assume a functional form for the
GDP function gt(p,x), collect data on output and input prices and quantities for the market sector for anumber of years (and for the consumption expenditures deflator), add error terms to equations (7) and(8) and use econometric techniques to estimate the unknown parameters in the assumed functional form.
However, econometric techniques are generally not completely straightforward: different
econometricians will make different stochastic specifications and will choose different functional
forms. 23 Moreover, as the number of outputs and inputs grows, it will be impossible to estimate a
flexible functional form. Thus we will suggest methods for implementing measures like (12) in thispaper that are based on exact index number techniques.
We turn now to the problem of defining theoretical indexes for the effects on real income due to changes
in real output prices. Define a family of period t real output price growth factors α(pt−1,pt,x,s): 24(13) α(pt−1,pt,x,s) ≡ gs(pt,x)/gs(pt−1,x) ;s = 1,2, ... .

Thus α(pt−1,pt,x,s) measures the proportional change in the real income produced by the market sector
that is induced by the change in real output prices going from period t−1 to t, using the referencetechnology that is available during period s and using the reference input quantities x. Thus, each choiceof the reference period for technology s and the reference input vector x will generate a possibly20

See Fisher (1922; 64).
See the discussion in Diewert (1997) on choosing the “best” symmetric average of Laspeyres and Paasche
indexes that will lead to the satisfaction of the time reversal test by the resulting average index.
22
The theoretical productivity change indexes defined by (10)-(12) were first defined by Diewert andMorrison (1986; 662-663). See Diewert (1993) for properties of symmetric means.
23“The estimation of GDP functions such as (19) can be controversial, however, since it raises issues such as
estimation technique and stochastic specification. ... We therefore prefer to opt for a more straightforward
index number approach.” Ulrich Kohli (2004a; 344).
24
This measure of real output price change was essentially defined by Fisher and Shell (1972; 56-58),
Samuelson and Swamy (1974; 588-592), Archibald (1977; 60-61), Diewert (1980; 460-461) (1983; 1055) and
Balk (1998; 83-89). Readers who are familiar with the theory of the true cost of living index will note that thereal output price index defined by (13) is analogous to the Konüs (1924) true cost of living index which is aratio of cost functions, say C(u,pt)/C(u,pt−1) where u is a reference utility level: gs replaces C and the reference
utility level u is replaced by the vector of reference variables x.
21

6different measure of the effect on real income of a change in real output prices going from period t−1 toperiod t.
Again, we can choose the reference vectors for the measure of output price change defined by (13) fromthe current year or the previous year: a Laspeyres type measure αLt that chooses the period t−1 referencetechnology and reference input vector xt−1 and a Paasche type measure αPt that chooses the period treference technology and reference input vector xt:
t = 1,2, ... ;(14) αLt ≡ α(pt−1,pt,xt−1,t−1) = gt−1(pt,xt−1)/gt−1(pt−1,xt−1) ;t = 1,2, ... .
(15) αPt ≡ α(pt−1,pt,xt,t) = gt(pt,xt)/gt(pt−1,xt) ;Since both measures of real output price change are equally valid, it is natural to average them to obtainan overall measure of the effects on real income of the change in real output prices: 25 The simple
geometric mean is justified from the same reason as that for the technical progress shift function.
(16) αt ≡ [αLt αPt]1/2 ;t = 1,2, ... .

Finally, we look at the problem of defining theoretical indexes for the effects on real income due tochanges in real output prices. Define a family of period t real input quantity growth factors
β(xt−1,xt,p,s): 26(17) β(xt−1,xt,p,s) ≡ gs(p,xt)/gs(p,xt−1) ;s = 1,2, ... .

Thus β(xt−1,xt,p,s) measures the proportional change in the real income produced by the market sector
that is induced by the change in input quantities going from period t−1 to t, using the technology that isavailable during period s and facing the reference real output prices p. Thus, each choice of the reference
period for technology s and the reference real output price vector p will generate a possibly different
measure of the effect on real income of a change in input quantities going from period t−1 to period t.
Again, We can choose the reference vectors for the measure of input quantity change defined by (13)from the current year or the previous year: a Laspeyres type measure βLt that chooses the period t−1
reference technology and reference real output price vector pt−1 and a Paasche type measure βPt thatchooses the period t reference technology and reference real output price vector pt:
t = 1,2, ... ;(18) βLt ≡ β(xt−1,xt,pt−1,t−1) = gt−1(pt−1,xt)/gt−1(pt−1,xt−1) ;t = 1,2, ... .
(19) βPt ≡ β(xt−1,xt,pt,t) = gt(pt,xt)/gt(pt,xt−1) ;Since both measures of real input growth are equally valid, it is natural to average them to obtain an
overall measure of the effects of input growth on real income: 27 The simple geometric mean is justified
from the same reason as that for the technical progress shift function.
(20) βt ≡ [βLt βPt]1/2 ;t = 1,2, ... .

25

The indexes defined by (13)-(16) were defined by Diewert and Morrison (1986; 664) in the nominal GDP
function context.
26
This type of index was defined as a true index of value added by Sato (1976; 438) and as a real input index
by Diewert (1980; 456).
27
The theoretical indexes defined by (17)-(20) were defined in Diewert and Morrison (1986; 665) in thenominal GDP context.

7

We provide all the theoretically motivated measures such as τLt, αLt, βLt, τPt, αPt, and βPt. Now, we
consider how to calculate these measures from the observed data. On the first sight, the effort is hopeless.
Under the constant returns to scale assumption on the technology set St, we have(21) pt yt = gt(pt,xt)
It means that we observe values for the denominator of Laspeyres type measure such as τLt, αLt, βLt andfor the numerator of Paasche type measure such as τPt, αPt, βPt. However, since we only know thedenominator or the numerator of indicators, we cannot calculate even any indicators of τLt, αLt, βLt, τPt,
αPt, and βPt.
For example, the numerator of Laspeyres type measure technical progress gt(pt−1,xt−1) is the hypotheticalrevenue that would result from using the period t technology with the period t−1 input quantities and real
output prices. Fortunately, these hypothetical revenues can be inferred from observed data if the period trevenue function follows the Translog functional form. The following Translog functional form is
known as the flexible functional form which approximates the arbitrary revenue function by the second
order: 28(22) lngt(p,x) ≡ a0t + ∑m=1M amt lnpmt + (1/2) ∑m=1M∑k=1M amk lnpmt lnpkt+ ∑n=1N bnt lnxnt + (1/2)∑n=1N∑j=1N bnj lnxnt lnxjt + ∑m=1M∑n=1M cmn lnpmt lnxnt ; t = 1,2, ... .
Note that the coefficients for the quadratic terms are assumed to be constant over time. The coefficients
must satisfy the following restrictions in order for gt to satisfy the linear homogeneity properties that wehave assumed in section 2 above: 29(23) ∑m=1M amt = 1 for t = 0,1,2, ...;
(24) ∑n=1N bnt = 1 for t = 0,1,2, ...;
(25) amk = akm for all k,m ;(26) bnj = bjn for all n,j ;(27) ∑k=1M amk = 0 for m = 1,...,M ;(28) ∑j=1N bnj = 0 for n = 1,...,N ;(29) ∑n=1N cmn = 0 for m = 1,...,M ;(30) ∑m=1M cmn = 0 for n = 1,...,N .
Theorem 1: Adaptation of Diewert and Morrison (1986) 30 : If gt−1 and gt are defined by (22)-(30)above and there is competitive profit maximizing behaviour on the part of all market sector producers
for all period t, we have28

This functional form was first suggested by Diewert (1974; 139) as a generalization of the translog
functional form introduced by Christensen, Jorgenson and Lau (1971). Diewert (1974; 139) indicated that thisfunctional form was flexible.
29
There are additional restrictions on the parameters which are necessary to ensure that gt(p,x) is convex in p
and concave in x.
30
Diewert and Morrison (1986) established their proof using the nominal GDP function gt(P,x). However, it iseasy to rework their proof using the deflated GDP function gt(p,x) using the fact that gt(p,x) = gt(P/PC,x) =gt(P,x)/PC using the linear homogeneity property of gt(P,x) in P. This argument is also true for theorem 2 and
3.

8

(31) τt = ptyt/(αt βt pt-1yt-1) ;t = 1,2, ...

where(32) lnαt = Σm=1(1/2)[(pmt−1ymt−1/pt−1⋅yt−1) + (pmtymt/pt⋅yt)] ln(pmt/pmt−1) ;(33) lnβt = Σn=1(1/2)[(wnt−1xnt−1/wt−1⋅xt−1) + (wnt xnt/wt⋅xt)] ln(xnt/xnt−1);
The above theorem shows how we can calculate the theoretically motivated measures such as τt, αt, andβt from observed data. Another contribution of the theorem is to show that the real income growth can beexactly decomposed into the three explanatory factors: productivity growth, real output price change,
and input quantity change.
For some purposes, it is convenient to decompose the aggregate period t contribution to real income
growth due to changes in all real output prices αt into separate effects for the change in each real output
price. Similarly, it can sometimes be useful to decompose the aggregate period t contribution to real
income growth due to changes in all input quantities βt into separate effects for the change in each input
quantity. We indicate how this can be done, making the same assumptions on the technology that wehave made so far.
We first model the effect of the change in the real output price of output m, say pm, going from period
t−1 to t. Counterparts to the theoretical Laspeyres and Paasche type price indexes defined by (14) and(15) above for all the outputs are the following Laspeyres type measure αLmt that chooses the period t−1
reference technology, holds constant other real output prices at their period t−1 levels, and holds input
quantities constant at their period t−1 levels and a Paasche type measure αPmt that chooses the period treference technology, holds constant other real output prices at their period t levels, and holds input
quantities constant at their period t levels;m = 1,...,M; t = 1,2, ... ;(34) αLmt ≡ gt−1(p1t−1,...,pm−1t−1,pmt,pm+1t−1,..., pMt−1,xt−1)/gt−1(pt−1,xt−1) ;m = 1,...,M; t = 1,2, ... .
(35) αPmt ≡ gt(pt,xt)/gt(p1t ,...,pm−1t,pmt−1,pm+1t,..., pMt,xt) ;Since both measures of real output price change are equally valid, it is natural to average them to obtainan overall measure of the effects on real income of the change in the real price of output m: 31(36) αmt ≡ [αLmt αPmt]1/2 ;m = 1,...,M ; t = 1,2, ... .

Under the assumption that the deflated GDP functions gt(p,x) have the translog functional forms as
defined by (22)-(30), the arguments of Diewert and Morrison (1986; 666) provide the following exact
decomposition of the period t aggregate real output price contribution factor αt into a product of separate
price contribution factors αmt:
Theorem 2: Adaptation of Diewert and Morrison (1986): If gt−1 and gt are defined by (22)-(33) above
and there is competitive profit maximizing behaviour on the part of all market sector producers for all
periods t, then we have(37) αt = α1tα2t... αMt ;t = 1,2, ... .

where
31

The indexes defined by (34)-(36) were defined by Diewert and Morrison (1986; 666) in the nominal GDP
function context.

9

(38) lnαmt = (1/2)[(pmt−1ymt−1/pt−1⋅yt−1) + (pmtymt/pt⋅yt)] ln(pmt/pmt−1) ;m = 1,...,M.

For example, we consider the case where there are four net outputs:• 1: Domestic sales;• 2: Investment;• 3: Exports and;• 4: Imports.
Since commodities 1, 2, and 3 are outputs, y1, y2, and y3 will be positive but since commodity 4 is an
input into the market sector, y3 will be negative. Hence an increase in the real price of exports will
increase real income but an increase in the real price of imports will decrease the real income generated
by the market sector, as is evident by looking at the contribution terms defined by (38) for m = 3(whereymt > 0) and for m = 4(where ymt < 0). The above decomposition (38) is useful for analyzing the impacts
that the changes in the real price of exports (i.e., a change in the price of exports relative to the price ofdomestic consumption) and in the real price of imports make on the real income generated by the market
sector.
We now model the effects of the change in the quantity of input n, say xn, going from period t−1 to t.
Individual counterparts to the overall theoretical Laspeyres and Paasche type quantity indexes defined by(18) and (19) above for all the inputs are the following Laspeyres type measures for input n βLnt thatchooses the period t−1 reference technology and holds constant real output prices at their period t−1
levels and holds other input quantities (other than input n) constant at their period t−1 levels and thePaasche type measures for input n βPnt that chooses the period t reference technology and hold constantreal output prices at their period t levels and hold other input quantities constant at their period t levels;n = 1,...,N; t = 1,2, ... ;(39) βLnt ≡ gt−1(pt−1,x1t−1,...,xn−1t−1,xnt,xn+1t−1,..., xNt−1)/gt−1(pt−1,xt−1) ;
t t t
t t
t
t
t
t−1
t
t
n = 1,...,N; t = 1,2, ... .
(40) βPn ≡ g (p ,x )/g (p ,x1 ,...,xn−1 ,xn ,xn+1 ,..., xN ) ;Since both measures of input change are equally valid, as usual, we average them to obtain an overallmeasure of the effects on real income of the change in the quantity of input n: 32(41) βnt ≡ [βLnt βPnt]1/2 ;n = 1,...,N ; t = 1,2, ... .

Under the assumption that the deflated GDP functions gt(p,x) have the Translog functional forms as
defined by (22)-(30), the arguments of Diewert and Morrison (1986; 666) can be adapted to provide thefollowing exact decomposition of the period t aggregate input growth contribution factor βt into a
product of separate input contribution factors βnt:
Theorem 3: Adaptation of Diewert and Morrison (1986): If gt−1 and gt are defined by (22)-(30) above
and there is competitive profit maximizing behaviour on the part of all market sector producers for all
periods t, then we have(42) βt = β1tβ2t... βNt ;t = 1,2, ... .

where
32

The indexes defined by (33)-(41) were defined by Diewert and Morrison (1986; 667) in the nominal GDP
function context.

10(43) lnβnt = (1/2)[(wnt−1xnt−1/wt−1⋅xt−1) + (wnt xnt/wt⋅xt)] ln(xnt/xnt−1) ;n = 1,...,N.

Substituting the results in Theorems 2 and 3 into the decomposition in Theorem 1 and rearranging theterms, we obtain the following formula;(44) ρt/ρt-1 = τt∏m=1Mαmt∏n=1Nβnt;t = 1,2, ... .

Thus the growth in real income over time can be explained by three main factors: productivity growth,
the growth of real output prices, and the growth of input quantities.
Rather than look at explanatory factors for the growth in real income, it is sometimes convenient toexpress the level of real income in period t in terms of cumulated period to period growth factors. Thus
(45) below defines a period t index of the technology level or of Total Factor Productivity in period t
relative to period 0, Tt; (46) defines a period t cumulated index of the level of real output m price change
since period 0, Amt; and (47) defines a period t cumulated index of the growth of input n since period 0:(45) T0 ≡ 1; Tt ≡ Tt-1τt;(46) Am0 ≡ 1; Amt ≡ Amt−1 αmt;(47) Bn0 ≡ 1; Bnt−1 ≡ Bn0βnt;

t = 1,2,…,;
m = 1,2,…,M and t = 1,2,…,;n = 1,2,…,N and t = 1,2,…,;Using the appropriate equalities (44) for the chain links that appear in (45)-(47), we can establish thefollowing exact relationship for the level of real income in period t, ρt, relative to its counterpart inperiod 0, ρ0, and the cumulated growth factors defined by (45)-(47):(48) ρt/ρ0 = Tt∏m=1MAmt∏n=1NBnt;

t = 1,2, ... .

3. Data Construction
3.1 The Definition of the Market Sector
In this paper, we focus on the production of the market sector within the whole economy. This is thesector which plays the critical role for economic growth. Following the 1993 SNA, we classify the
producers for the whole economy into the following five mutually exclusive institutional sectors;• IU1; Non-financial corporations;• IU2; Financial corporations;• IU3; General government;• IU4; Households 33 ;• IU5; Non-profit institutions serving households.
In our definition, the market sector consists of IU1, IU2, and IU5. Thus, we subtract the government’s
and the households’ outputs and inputs from aggregate output, capital services and labour input in orderto perform the growth accounting exercise explained in the previous section. There are two types oftransactions between the market sector and general government sector; (1) the sales of goods andservices of the general government sector to the market sector and (2) the purchases of intermediate
inputs by the general government sector from the market sector. Note that the sales of goods andservices by the general government sector are considered as inputs for the market sector while thepurchases of intermediate inputs by the general government sector are regarded as outputs by the market
33

According to UN (1993), the unincorporated enterprises are parts of the household sectors. However, weadded the unincorporated enterprises to IU1 or IU2 based on the characteristics of the enterprise. Therefore, in
our classification, households only includes household own-account producers.

11sector. Thus, the difference between (1) and (2) is the net output by the market sector which has beenpurchased by the general government sector. In the Japanese national accounts, the imputed rent of theowner-occupied dwellings is the major output by the household sector. 34 The households sector
produces imputed rent by making use of capital services from the stock of owner-occupied houses.
Therefore, we need to subtract the imputed rent from the consumption output and the stock of owneroccupied houses from the total stock of residential buildings. 35
3.2 The Database for Inputs and Outputs
Our final data set consists of price and quantity series for the variables listed below. They are the inputs
and outputs for the market sector. We also followed the conventions introduced by Jorgenson and
Griliches on the treatment of indirect taxes; i.e., we adjusted prices for tax wedges whenever possible sothat the adjusted prices reflect the prices that producers face. 36 We also included the services ofinventories and land (utilized by the market sector) as capital inputs.
The net outputs in our most disaggregated data base are as follows:• C; Domestic final consumption expenditure of households (excluding the imputed rent ofowner-occupied dwellings);• N; Final consumption expenditure of private non-profit institutions serving households;• G; Net purchases of goods and services by the general government from the market sector;• X; Exports of goods and services (including direct purchases in the domestic market by nonresident households since this is a source of revenue to the market sector);• M; Imports of goods and services (excluding direct purchases abroad by resident households
since this is not a source of revenue to the Japanese market sector);• I1 to I95; Gross investments for 95 asset categories;• IV1 to IV4; Change in inventories for 4 types of inventory asset.
The primary inputs in our most disaggregated data base are as follows:• K1 to K95; Capital services from 95 classes of fixed asssets;• KIV1 to KIV4; Inventory services for 4 classes of inventory asset;• LD1 to LD4; Market sector land services and• LB1 to LB3; Labour input for 3 types of labour.
Dividing the prices of inputs and outputs by the price of domestic final consumption expenditure ofhouseholds PC, we constructed the corresponding real input and output prices. The net outputs C, N, G,
X, and M have been constructed as aggregates of the net output components listed above and areessentially based on the data of the Japanese national accounts. Since the Japanese national accounts
experienced several revisions, there are different data series even for the same variable. We chose thereference data series from the most recent publication and extended these series by using the growth34

We ignore other own-account production by households.
The household sector purchases goods and services for the maintenance of owner-occupied houses. The
expenses on these goods and services are produced by the market sector and thus are part of our market sector
output.
36
Thus our suggested treatment of indirect commodity taxes in an accounting framework that is suitable for
productivity analysis follows the example set by Jorgenson and Griliches who advocated the following
treatment of indirect taxes: “In our original estimates, we used gross product at market prices; we now employ
gross product from the producers’ point of view, which includes indirect taxes levied on factor outlay, but
excludes indirect taxes levied on output.” Jorgenson and Griliches (1972; 85).
35

12

rates of other data series from earlier publications. 37 A more detailed explanation of our data
construction methods is provided in appendix.
Table 1: List of Capital Services, Inventory Services, and Land Services
Name
K1

Trees (growth)

K53

Other ships

K2

Livestock (growth)

K54

Railway vehicles

K3

Textile products

K55

Aircraft

K4

Wooded products

K56

BicyclesK5

Wooden furniture and fixtures

K57

Transport equipment for industrial use

K6

Metallic furniture and fixtures

K58

Other transport equipment

K７

Nuclear fuel rods

K59

CameraK8

Metallic products

K60

Other photographic and optical instruments

K9

Boilers and turbines

K61

Watches and clocks

K0

Engines

K62

Physics and chemistry instruments

K11

Conveyors

K63

Analytical and measuring instruments and testing machines

K12

Refrigerators and air conditioning apparatus

K64

Medical instruments

K13

Pumps and compressors

K65

Miscellaneous manufacturing products

K14

Sewing machines

K66

Residential construction (wooden)

K15

Other general industrial machinery and equipment

K67

Residential construction (non-wooden)

K16

Mining, civil engineering and construction machinery

K68

Non-residential construction (wooden)

K17

Chemical machinery

K69

Non-residential construction (non-wooden)

K18

Industrial robots

K70

Road construction

K19

Metal machine tools

K71

Street construction

K20

Metal processing machinery

K72

Bridge construction

K21

Agricultural machinery

K73

Toll road construction

K22

Textile machinery

K74

River improvement

K23

Food processing machinery

K75

Erosion control

K24

Sawmill, wood working, veneer and plywood machinery

K76

Seashore improvement

K25

Pulp equipment and paper machinery

K77

Park construction

K26

Printing, bookbinding and paper processing machinery

K78

Sewer construction

K27

Casting equipment

K79

Sewage disposal facilities

K28

Plastic processing machinery

K80

Waste disposal facilities

K29

Other special industrial machinery, nec

K81

Harbor construction

K30

Other general machines and parts

K82

Fishing port construction

K31

Office machines

K83

Airport construction

K32

Vending, amusement and other service machinery

K84

Agricultural construction

K33

Electric audio equipment

K85

Forest road construction

K34

Radio and television sets

K86

Forestry protection

K35

Video recording and playback equipment

K87

Railway construction

K36

Household electric appliance

K88

Electric power facilities

K37

Electronic computer and peripheral equipment

K89

Telecommunication facilities

K38

Wired communication equipment

K90

Other civil engineering and construction

K39

Radio communication equipment

K91

Plant engineering

K40

Other communication equipment

K92

Mineral exploration

K41

Applied electronic equipment

K93

Custom software

K42

Electric measuring instruments

K94

Pre-packaged software

K43

Generators

K95

Own-account software

K44

Electric motors

KIV1

Finished-goods inventory

K45

Relay switches and switchboards

KIV2

Work-in-process inventory

K46

Other industrial heavy electrical equipment

KIV3

Work-in-process inventory for cultivated assets

K47

Electric lighting fixtures and apparatus

KIV4

Material inventory

K48

Passenger motor vehicles

LD1

Land for agricultural use

K49

Trucks, buses and other vehicles

LD2

Land for industrial use

K50

Two-wheel motor vehicles

LD3

Land for commercial use

K51

Motor vehicle parts

LD4

Land for residential use

K52

Steel ships

37

The data from the Japanese national accounts are taken from publications such as the Annual Report on
National Income Statistics 1975, Report on National Accounts from 1955 to 1998, Annual Report on National
Accounts of 2000, and Annual Report on National Accounts of 2004-2008. See appendix for the further
explanation.

13

Quantities of capital services, inventory services, and land services are proportional to capital stocks of
fixed assets, inventories, and land at the beginning of the year. Capital stocks have been constructed byapplying the perpetual inventory method using the gross investment data (I1 to I95) to the initial stocksof 1955, using asset specific depreciation rates suggested by Nomura (2004). Changes in Inventories
IV1-IV4 are calculated by using the difference between the inventory stock in the current period and theinventory stock in the previous period. The initial stocks for fixed assets, inventory stocks and land andthe price and quantity series for investments have been taken from KEO database. This is acomprehensive productivity database for the Japanese economy constructed by the Keio Economic
Observatory (KEO) at Keio University. 38 The detailed procedures used to construct prices and quantities
for capital stocks and services are explained in Nomura (2004). For residential structures and residential
land, we use other data sources in order to net out the stocks held by the household sector, whichcorresponds to the stocks of residential land and structures used by owner-occupier households. Our
procedures will be explained in the following subsection. Prices of capital services for the 95 types ofreproducible capital services K1-K95, for the 4 types of inventory services KIV1-KIV4 and the fourtypes of land services LD1-LD4 are calculated by applying a user cost formula which we will explain in
the next section.
Estimates of the quantities of labour services LB1-LB4 are based on hours of work. There are threedifferent types of workers; the self-employed, family workers, and employees. After we calculate theaverage labour income and the hours of works for each type of worker, we aggregate these three types oflabour into a labour aggregate using a superlative index number formula. We explain how we calculate
the average labour income for three types of workers in the data appendix. Investments I1-I95
correspond to the capital services K1-K95. Changes in inventories IV1-IV4 correspond to the inventory
stocks KIV1-KIV4. The Table 1 lists the names of all capital stocks, inventory stocks and land stocks.
The following subsection explains how we constructed the price, quantity and value series for the capital
inputs. The details on how our labour inputs were constructed may be found in Appendix A.
3.3 User Costs and Real Rates of Return
Prices of capital services, inventory services and land services are estimated as user costs of capital. User
costs are constructed for each of our capital stock components. The general formula for a user cost for acapital stock component in year t, ut, is as follows:(49) ut = PKt − (1−δ)PKt(1+it)/(1+rt)
where PKt is the beginning of year t asset price for the capital stock component, δ is the geometricdepreciation rate that applies to the asset,39 it is the amount of asset specific price change that is expected
to occur over the course of year t and rt is the nominal rate of return (or opportunity cost of capital) that
producers face at the beginning of year t. Thus the user cost of a durable input is equal to its purchasecost or opportunity cost at the beginning of the year, PKt, less the discounted expected value of thedepreciated asset at the end of the year. 40 The nominal rate of return rt can be decomposed into a real
rate of return component rt* and an expected general inflation component, it*, by using the following
formula:38

This database also includes labour inputs. Kuroda, Shimpo, Nomura, and Kobayashi (1997) explains thedata construction of labour inputs in detail. In this paper, we use only their relative wages for employees, theself-employed and family workers from KEO database.
39
We assume that the depreciation rates for the inventory stocks and land components are 0.
40
We have temporarily neglected tax factors for simplicity.

14(50) 1+rt = (1+rt*)(1+ it*).
The practical problem for the economic statistician with a user cost formulae of the type defined by (49)and (50) is that there is uncertainty about how exactly to estimate the depreciation rate δ, the relevant
real rate of return rt* and the two anticipated inflation rates, ρt (general inflation rate) and it (asset
specific inflation rate). If we estimate it* and it as actual ex post inflation rates, we will almost certainly
generate user costs ut which are negative for some years, which is not sensible in our context since wewant our user costs to closely approximate market rental rates for the assets and these rates would not be
negative. Even if we estimate it* and it by smoothing the ex post values for these variables or using aforecasting model, with Japanese data, we will inevitably generate some negative user costs for landcomponents, due to the very rapid land price inflation that occurred in Japan during the 1980’s. We
decided to avoid these negative user cost problems by assuming that producers expect the asset specificinflation rate it to equal the general inflation rate it*; i.e., we make the following assumption:(51) it = it* .
If we substitute (50) and (51) into (49), we find that our user cost formula simplifies as follows: 41(52) ut = PKt − (1−δ)PKt/(1+rt*) = [rt* + δ]PKt /(1+rt*).
We approximate the beginning of the year asset price PKt by the corresponding year t investment pricePIt. Thus our final user cost formula has the following generic form where τt is the business tax rate: 42(53) ut ≡ [rt* + τt + δ]PIt /(1+rt*).
There remains the problem of finding a suitable real interest rate series, rt*, which will be discussed
below. Once rt* has been determined, the user cost defined by (53) can be calculated for each of our 95
types of capital services, 4 types of inventory services, and 4 types of land services. The corresponding
beginning of year capital stocks have already been described and tabled. We normalize the resulting user
costs so that they are 1 in 1955 and offsetting normalizations are made to our capital quantity series. The
resulting input prices are WK1t-WK95t, WKIV1t-WKIV4t, and WLD1t-WLD4t and the resulting quantities are
xK1t-xK95t, xKIV1t-xKIV4t, and xLD1t-xLD4t. The price series and the quantity series for 13 aggregated inputs
and outputs are listed in Appendix B. 43
Finally, we discuss how we obtained a suitable real interest rate series rt*. The rate we chose is an
economy wide ex post real rate of return. If we use the user cost formula (53) in order to form prices forcapital services, then we can rearrange the value of outputs equals the value of primary inputs equation
into a single (linear) equation involving an unknown real rate of return. The solutions to these equations(one for each year) are the series of ex post real interest rates, rt*, listed below in Figure 1.
The average rate for the years 1955-2006 is 3.25%. It is consistent with “the long run observed economy
wide real rates of return for most OECD countries which fall in the 3 to 5 per cent rage” (Diewert(2004)). The performance of the Japanese economy over the years 1955-2006 can be divided into 5
periods:
41

For discussions about alternative assumptions for user cost formulae, see Schreyer (2001) (2007) (2008)
and Diewert (1980) (2004) (2005b).
42
For business structures and land, we need to add the appropriate specific property tax rates to the generaltax rate τt.
43More detailed data will be provided to the interested reader.

15

•
•
•
•
•

Period 1: 1955-1973: Rapid economic growth;
Period 2: 1974-1979: Stagnation between oil shocks;
Period 3: 1980-1990: Stable economic growth;
Period 4: 1991-2001: Long recession and stagnation;
Period 5: 2002-2006: Modest economic recovery.
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Figure 1: The Real Rate of Return for the Years 1955-2006
The average real rates of return for the above periods are 5.390% (Period 1), 2.841% (Period 2), 2.196%(Period 3), 1.467% (Period 4) and 1.876% (Period 5). Even though currently, the Japanese economy is ina period of economic recovery, its average real rate of return is still significantly smaller than the
average real rate of return of the period of rapid economic growth (Period 1).
4. Results
4.1 Japanese Productivity Growth: A Conventional Approach
In this section, we measure the productivity growth of the market sector of the Japanese economy using
a conventional chained Fisher index number approach. Depending on whether inventory stock services
or land services are included in the list of primary inputs, we can consider three different cases:• Case 1: inventory stock services and land stock services are in the list of capital inputs;• Case 2: land stock services are not in the list of capital services and• Case 3: inventory stock services and land stock services are both excluded from the list ofcapital services.
Since we endogenously determine the real rate of return from the zero profit condition, the compositionof capital inputs affects the real rate of return. Basically, the conventional measure of productivity
growth is set equal to a chained Fisher output quantity index divided by a chained Fisher input quantity
index. Thus, the composition of capital inputs also affects the productivity growth. Thus in Table 2,
under the above three assumptions, we list three sets of the Fisher year to year output and input growth
factors, yt/yt-1, xt/xt-1 respectively along with their ratios, τt ≡ [yt/yt-1]/[xt/xt-1] and the balancing year t realinterest rates rt.

16

Table 2: Chained Fisher Indexes of Output, Input and Productivity Growth and the Balancing
Real Rate of Return in the Japanese Economy, 1956-2006.
Case 1
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

Case 2

Case 3yt/yt-1

xt/xt-1

τtrr

yt/yt-1

xt/xt-1

τtrr

yt/yt-1

xt/xt-1τtrr

1.00000
1.11124
1.09559
1.05114
1.13732
1.17782
1.15667
1.07165
1.10261
1.13972
1.05337
1.13090
1.13551
1.13640
1.14133
1.10251
1.036391.08462
1.10733
0.98945
1.00794
1.06272
1.03519
1.05398
1.08746
1.028111.02026
1.02889
1.019901.049421.05245
1.025481.04535
1.06680
1.067221.05501
1.031781.01006
0.991011.01093
1.01713
1.02595
1.01392
0.97028
0.99586
1.02453
0.992621.00694
1.00865
1.035401.034931.03959

1.00000
1.046101.04682
1.03596
1.033391.04740
1.04836
1.06156
1.04220
1.04801
1.052211.06057
1.05551
1.04439
1.05594
1.05403
1.04886
1.03837
1.05482
1.022221.00880
1.04474
1.03236
1.02279
1.02771
1.03101
1.02825
1.02405
1.03435
1.01687
1.03023
1.02565
1.029641.03325
1.03108
1.029101.02860
1.01805
1.011101.00958
1.01180
1.010541.008111.006311.00156
1.01694
0.99708
0.999071.00271
1.00794
1.005211.015391.00000
1.06227
1.04659
1.01466
1.10057
1.12451
1.103311.00951
1.05797
1.08751
1.00111
1.06632
1.07579
1.088101.08087
1.04599
0.988111.044541.049780.96794
0.99915
1.017211.00274
1.03049
1.058140.99718
0.99223
1.00473
0.98602
1.03201
1.02157
0.99984
1.01526
1.03247
1.03506
1.02518
1.00309
0.992150.980131.00133
1.00527
1.01525
1.00576
0.964190.99432
1.00746
0.99553
1.00788
1.00593
1.02725
1.02957
1.02383

0.041850.041130.04191
0.03895
0.04634
0.055410.062450.05757
0.06069
0.06437
0.05974
0.06356
0.06561
0.06852
0.06616
0.061370.047890.042360.038140.030110.02464
0.02903
0.026410.02801
0.032240.027800.024420.022430.01973
0.022350.024140.022390.01975
0.01966
0.020390.01847
0.016200.017650.01487
0.014630.01457
0.016200.01651
0.01273
0.013280.013370.011360.015360.017100.020480.019700.02115

1.00000
1.11130
1.09565
1.05135
1.13733
1.17783
1.15657
1.07167
1.10258
1.13972
1.05338
1.13091
1.13552
1.136421.14127
1.10246
1.03592
1.08456
1.10783
0.98892
1.00775
1.06273
1.03508
1.05394
1.087401.028291.020221.02889
1.019901.04940
1.05234
1.02588
1.04535
1.06678
1.06723
1.05505
1.03175
1.010070.991011.01093
1.01716
1.025961.013890.97030
0.99592
1.02452
0.992631.00693
1.00868
1.03538
1.03491
1.03949

1.00000
1.050221.05394
1.04498
1.039411.06035
1.06483
1.08373
1.05851
1.065121.06825
1.06334
1.06091
1.06495
1.06967
1.07718
1.07088
1.05163
1.05967
1.03299
1.01492
1.04880
1.03479
1.02585
1.03194
1.037451.03467
1.028171.038071.02095
1.03604
1.03198
1.03580
1.03803
1.03660
1.03561
1.03597
1.02275
1.013881.01093
1.013211.011621.00925
1.007071.002311.01671
0.997410.99938
1.00235
1.00847
1.00565
1.01556

1.00000
1.05815
1.03958
1.00610
1.094211.11080
1.086150.98886
1.041641.07005
0.98608
1.063541.07032
1.06711
1.06693
1.023470.96735
1.03132
1.045450.95734
0.99294
1.01328
1.00028
1.02738
1.05374
0.991170.98604
1.00070
0.98250
1.02787
1.01573
0.994091.009221.027701.02955
1.01876
0.995930.98760
0.977441.00000
1.003891.014171.00459
0.96349
0.99362
1.00768
0.99521
1.00755
1.006311.02668
1.02909
1.02356

0.103160.106070.11287
0.11166
0.142470.18635
0.208960.193390.20584
0.220150.20023
0.21867
0.23952
0.25843
0.262300.246100.194700.186970.175220.122190.094640.10402
0.096190.103900.11336
0.098470.089440.08430
0.07751
0.08606
0.091150.08901
0.08651
0.090170.09459
0.08950
0.077160.07061
0.058210.05499
0.053240.055420.052620.041350.04065
0.04116
0.036020.04076
0.042440.04759
0.04674
0.048211.00000
1.11130
1.09565
1.05135
1.13733
1.17783
1.15657
1.07167
1.10258
1.13972
1.05338
1.13091
1.13552
1.136421.14127
1.10246
1.03592
1.08456
1.10783
0.98892
1.00775
1.06273
1.03508
1.05394
1.087401.028291.020221.02889
1.019901.04940
1.05234
1.02588
1.04535
1.06678
1.06723
1.05505
1.03175
1.010070.991011.01093
1.01716
1.025961.013890.97030
0.99592
1.02452
0.992631.00693
1.00868
1.03538
1.03491
1.03949

1.00000
1.04597
1.049811.04277
1.04126
1.05895
1.06574
1.082111.06324
1.067361.07038
1.066111.06330
1.06534
1.07146
1.07962
1.07382
1.05745
1.065101.03418
1.01513
1.05224
1.036231.02809
1.034481.036311.034481.029111.03902
1.02240
1.03707
1.03278
1.03752
1.03883
1.03733
1.03572
1.036441.023281.01438
1.011541.01370
1.01156
1.00908
1.00694
1.002441.01732
0.997440.99978
1.00258
1.008811.00600
1.015031.00000
1.06246
1.04366
1.00823
1.09227
1.11226
1.085230.99035
1.03700
1.06780
0.984121.06078
1.06792
1.06672
1.06515
1.021160.96470
1.025641.040120.95624
0.99273
1.00997
0.99889
1.025141.05115
0.99226
0.986210.99979
0.98159
1.026411.01472
0.99331
1.00755
1.02691
1.02883
1.01866
0.995480.98709
0.976960.99940
1.003411.01423
1.00476
0.96361
0.99349
1.00708
0.99517
1.00715
1.00608
1.02633
1.02873
1.02409

0.134160.13968
0.154070.155240.20034
0.26734
0.30273
0.27666
0.291240.308870.275360.301310.332370.361360.365310.335270.257870.243170.22558
0.15367
0.11782
0.127470.11632
0.12382
0.133400.11589
0.10488
0.098160.08963
0.09863
0.103430.10000
0.096100.09974
0.10403
0.098200.084130.07626
0.06253
0.05896
0.05680
0.059140.056140.04415
0.043390.043810.038210.042990.04472
0.050130.049240.05093

Averageyt/yt-1

xt/xt-1

τtrr

yt/yt-1

xt/xt-1

τtrr

yt/yt-1

xt/xt-1

τtrr

1955-2006
1955-1973
1974-1979
1980-1990
1991-2001
2002-2006

1.05533
1.10380
1.03946
1.04172
1.007641.025101.02878
1.04603
1.026441.02850
1.01088
1.00606

1.02546
1.055131.01261
1.01287
0.99677
1.01889

0.03252
0.053900.028410.021960.01467
0.01876

1.05533
1.10380
1.03930
1.04176
1.00765
1.02508

1.035441.05829
1.03155
1.03394
1.01283
1.00628

1.01889
1.04301
1.00749
1.00758
0.99487
1.018640.115220.18806
0.10572
0.08879
0.05286
0.04515

1.05533
1.10380
1.03930
1.04176
1.00765
1.02508

1.03629
1.05946
1.033391.03460
1.013101.006441.01806
1.04187
1.00569
1.006930.99461
1.018480.147510.25936
0.12875
0.10079
0.05668
0.04760

Table 2 shows that it is extremely important to include land and inventory services in the list of capital
services. If these primary inputs are omitted from a productivity analysis, the results will be distorted.
The growth rates for primary inputs will be too high and thus productivity growth will be underestimated.
The exclusion of business land services from the primary inputs significantly changes our estimate. This
exclusion bias becomes more serious during periods when the price of land is very high. Thus,
productivity growth when land is included (Case 1) is almost 50% greater compared to when it is
excluded during the years 1980-1990 (Cases 2 and 3). This period includes the bubble era at the end of
the 1980’s.
Now, we turn to the theoretical framework presented in section 2 and determine the factors that explain
real income growth in the Japanese economy using a traditional value added framework as opposed to
the net framework which will be discussed later in section 4.3.

17

4.2 The Decomposition of Deflated GDP Growth
We implement the translog approach using our Japanese database. The chain link information on period
by period changes in real income that corresponds to (44) is listed in Table 3.
Table 3: The Decomposition of Market Sector Real Income Growth into Translog Productivity,
Real Output Price Change and Input Quantity Contribution Factors
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

ρt

τt

αCt

αNt

αGt

αXt

αMt

αIt

αIVt

β Kt

βKIVt

βLDt

βLBt

1.13349
1.09829
1.05396
1.12932
1.17609
1.15450
1.04941
1.07386
1.13395
1.03110
1.12652
1.13975
1.12644
1.14055
1.09177
1.02189
1.08106
1.116540.95963
0.96594
1.03629
1.02215
1.05758
1.07995
0.99400
1.01436
1.02273
1.01495
1.04747
1.047101.03404
1.04380
1.06827
1.069211.05126
1.02965
1.00706
0.98677
1.00652
1.015221.01852
1.005700.970110.98762
1.018210.98803
1.00473
1.00378
1.03283
1.027841.04007

1.06216
1.04657
1.014641.10058
1.12451
1.10335
1.00952
1.05800
1.08753
1.001121.066311.07579
1.088121.080891.04602
0.988121.04458
1.04973
0.967850.999171.017211.00274
1.03049
1.058120.99718
0.99223
1.00473
0.98602
1.032021.021510.99985
1.01525
1.032481.03506
1.025191.00309
0.992150.980131.00134
1.00527
1.01525
1.00576
0.964190.99432
1.00746
0.99554
1.00788
1.00593
1.02725
1.02958
1.02384

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.00065
1.00033
1.00004
1.00006
1.00024
1.000111.00000
0.99995
1.00052
0.99985
1.00024
1.000311.00009
1.000311.00058
1.000421.00052
1.000391.000210.99999
1.000121.00006
0.99996
1.000220.99997
0.999830.99999
0.99995
1.00000
1.000031.00004
1.00004
1.00005
1.00005
1.00024
1.00009
0.99997
0.99990
1.00004
1.00006
1.00004
1.00005
1.00008
0.99993
1.00000
1.00009
0.999830.99993
1.000071.000291.00040

1.001101.00032
0.99874
0.999190.99918
0.99889
0.99811
0.99764
0.99889
0.998160.999410.999900.99905
0.99920
0.99883
0.998100.998210.99937
1.00525
0.992410.99908
0.99884
0.998131.00047
1.00187
1.000310.99900
0.99958
0.99933
1.00130
0.99747
0.99866
0.99896
1.000111.00026
0.999350.999450.999510.99920
0.99957
0.99968
1.000190.999910.99966
1.00004
1.00009
1.00009
0.99977
1.00019
1.00053
1.00084

1.00404
0.99667
0.99183
0.99872
0.99979
0.992970.99005
0.99478
0.998280.99082
0.99500
0.996430.994430.99730
0.99558
0.99451
0.992120.998091.00805
0.99079
0.989070.983640.98503
1.006101.00201
0.99792
1.00205
0.99164
0.99876
0.99178
0.97995
0.99459
0.99760
1.001780.999120.99462
0.99537
0.991310.99630
0.998101.00399
1.00090
1.00235
0.98883
0.99535
1.00440
1.00063
0.99627
1.00032
1.004621.010210.992440.99924
1.021141.00485
1.003291.00584
1.00977
1.006101.00149
1.00920
1.00369
1.00537
1.00567
1.00066
1.00529
1.01105
1.01061
0.992280.96430
1.002631.00535
1.015021.02459
0.973310.96453
1.006240.99970
1.01139
1.007031.01037
1.03974
1.00739
1.00282
0.99552
0.99558
1.00677
1.006391.00801
1.003931.00152
0.993640.994811.00247
1.00867
0.99765
0.99634
0.99950
1.00023
0.994390.985840.98415

1.01873
1.007420.991640.990450.99757
1.004290.98409
0.97719
0.996220.98204
0.99855
1.00280
0.99305
1.00166
0.99146
0.983400.99523
1.016630.99443
0.97304
0.981430.99028
0.996121.01299
0.99932
0.990410.99334
0.99268
0.99313
0.99195
0.992170.99790
1.00197
1.00447
1.00130
0.99725
0.99587
0.99698
0.996100.99887
0.99539
0.99600
0.995020.99475
1.00087
0.99437
0.997800.99903
1.002641.00186
1.00489

1.00309
0.99853
0.99958
0.99973
0.99847
0.99608
0.99725
0.998210.99954
0.998810.99925
0.99893
0.99897
1.000190.998560.999101.000201.00128
0.99792
0.999441.00000
0.99992
1.000121.000350.99909
0.99965
0.99998
1.00005
0.99997
0.99970
1.00001
0.99999
1.00001
0.999960.999900.99992
1.00001
1.00009
1.00009
0.99999
0.99999
0.999910.99999
0.999960.99995
1.000140.99997
0.99994
0.99995
1.00006
1.000271.00105
1.00900
1.015101.01405
1.01590
1.025391.03128
1.02888
1.02679
1.02823
1.022691.024191.028441.03113
1.03250
1.033121.02580
1.023421.02384
1.01697
1.01332
1.01237
1.01230
1.01477
1.01498
1.014191.013171.01180
1.011071.01903
1.01696
1.01836
1.01615
1.01767
1.01950
1.01905
1.01730
1.01236
1.00732
1.005431.00697
1.00884
1.00896
1.00572
1.00482
1.00656
1.005961.00334
1.004291.00473
1.00691

1.00232
1.00280
1.00245
1.00074
1.00249
1.00288
1.00432
1.00170
1.00238
1.002421.00161
1.00189
1.00300
1.00278
1.00256
1.00200
1.00033
1.000211.001271.001070.99973
1.00030
0.99988
0.99979
1.00116
1.00071
1.00020
1.000120.99984
1.000221.000150.99986
1.00009
1.000101.00033
1.00019
1.00009
1.00001
0.999900.99991
1.000121.000171.00015
1.00000
0.99978
1.00002
0.99984
0.999910.99986
0.99985
1.00035

1.00037
1.00086
1.00105
1.00179
1.00130
1.005141.005161.00496
1.00522
1.00701
1.015431.01508
1.00629
1.01532
1.00761
1.00624
1.006641.01345
1.00826
1.00647
1.00373
1.00572
1.00385
1.00323
1.003461.00177
1.002421.00201
1.00049
1.00295
1.00052
1.001811.002241.00182
1.00225
1.00106
1.002221.001931.00165
1.00098
1.001391.001291.001441.000481.00091
1.00066
1.00035
1.000800.99989
1.000121.00098

1.04230
1.03372
1.01702
1.01650
1.027121.014221.01966
1.006201.01294
1.01372
1.019641.01336
1.006131.00579
1.01052
1.00692
1.005211.016840.98909
0.98451
1.027451.013641.006611.00973
1.011131.01135
1.008101.020121.00540
1.00785
1.00786
1.009401.01447
1.011221.006811.00811
0.998420.99683
1.00070
1.005441.00202
0.997810.99580
0.99539
1.011360.989900.99296
0.99866
1.00389
1.00051
1.00709

Average

ρt

τt

αCt

αNt

αGt

αXt

αMt

αIt

αIVt

β Kt

βKIVt

βLDt

βLBt

1956-2006
1956-1973
1974-1979
1980-1990
1991-2001
2002-2006

1.05000
1.104361.02026
1.03702
1.00304
1.02185

1.02595
1.058201.01260
1.01286
0.99677
1.01889

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.000121.00026
1.00009
1.000021.000021.000100.999440.99902
0.999030.999710.99970
1.00028

0.99657
0.99563
0.99378
0.99611
0.997411.002411.00192
1.00489
0.99753
1.00366
1.00184
0.99282

0.996220.99625
0.99138
0.99624
0.99650
1.001240.99965
0.999210.999620.99984
1.00000
1.00004

1.01592
1.023161.01559
1.01572
1.00939
1.00504

1.00086
1.00216
1.00034
1.00025
1.000030.999961.00369
1.00661
1.005211.00198
1.00127
1.000431.00858
1.01599
1.005171.01034
1.00016
1.00062

The net outputs in our most disaggregated data base are as follows:• C; Domestic final consumption expenditure of households (excluding the imputed rent ofowner-occupied dwellings);• N; Final consumption expenditure of private non-profit institutions serving households;• G; Net purchases of goods and services by the general government from the market sector;• X; Exports of goods and services (excluding direct purchases in the domestic market by nonresident households);

18

•
•
•

M; Imports of goods and services (excluding direct purchases abroad by resident households);
I1 to I95; Gross investments for 95 asset categories;
IV1 to IV4; Change in inventories for 4 types of inventory asset.

The primary inputs in our most disaggregated data base are as follows:• K1 to K95; Capital services from 95 classes of fixed asssets;• KIV1 to KIV4; Inventory services for 4 classes of inventory asset;• LD1 to LD4; Market sector land services and• LB1 to LB3; Labour input for 3 types of labour.
The growth rate of real income ρt is decomposed into a productivity growth factor τt, several factors due
to changes in real output prices αCt (domestic final consumption), αNt (non-profit institution final
consumption), αGt (net government purchases from the market sector), αXt (exports), αMt (imports), αIt(investment in reproducible capital) and αIVt (inventory change) and several factors for growth in input
quantities βKt (reproducible capital services), βKIVt (inventory capital services), βLDt (market sector land
services) and βLBt (labour services). From the average contribution factors, it can be seen that real
income growth ρt is at a very high average annual rate of 5% per year. On average, the productivity
growth factor τt accounted for 2.595% of the real income growth, labour input growth βLBt for 0.858%
and capital input growth βKt for 1.592% on average while the contribution factors for real output pricechanges were −0.387% due to investment prices falling faster than consumption prices αIt, −0.343% peryear due to export prices falling faster than consumption prices αXt, and 0.192% per year due to importprices falling more rapidly than consumption prices αMt. Thus, it seems that the effects of changes in theterms of trade on living standards were very small for Japan over the entire period 1955-2006: an overall
negative contribution of −0.15% per year. However, during shorter periods of time, changes in the termsof trade have larger impacts. It accounted for −0.867% of the average real income growth rate of 2.026%
during the stagnation period between the oil shocks (1973-1979) and it also accounted for −0.478% of
the average real income growth rate of 2.185% during the period of economic recovery (2002-2006). On
average over the years 1955-2006, the productivity growth factor τt accounted for 2.595% of the real
income growth rate ρt of 5% and capital input factor βKt for 1.592%. We can see that productivity growth
plays more important role in explaining real income growth than capital input over the entire period.
However, the average contribution after 1973 of capital input growth (1.197% per year) is larger thanthat of productivity growth (0.837% per year). We can see that the importance of the contribution ofcapital input growth relative to the contribution by productivity growth increases over time. However,this is not the end of story. During the period of economic recovery 2002-2006, the average contribution
by productivity growth of 1.889% becomes bigger than the average contribution by capital services
growth, which was 0.504%. Thus we can observe that the recent economic recovery is mostly boosted
by productivity growth rather than by capital deepening.
The annual change information in the previous table can be converted into cumulative changes using
equations (48). Table 4 gives this cumulative growth information.
The level of real income ρt is decomposed into the product of the level of productivity Tt, the levels of
several real output price factors ACt, ANt, AGt, AXt, AMt, AIt, and AIVt and the levels of several input
quantity growth factors BKt, BKIVt, BLDt, and BLBt. Over the 52 year period, real income ρt/ρ0 (from thegross domestic product point of view) grew over eleven fold (11.2932), which is spectacular growth. 44
From the above Table 4, it can be seen that productivity growth Tt contributes the most to the overall
44

However, note that real income grew just over 10 fold by 1991 and in the 15 years since then, it has grownby only 11.6%.

19

growth in real income (3.58265), the growth in reproducible capital input BKt makes the next largest
contribution (2.23389) followed by the growth in labour input BLBt (1.54139) while the change in real
investment prices AIt makes a negative contribution (0.82271) as does the growth in real export price AXt(0.83831) and finally, the change in real import prices AMt makes a modest positive contribution(1.09826).
Table 4: The Decomposition of Market Sector Real Income Level into Cumulative Productivity,
Real Output Price Change and Input Quantity Contribution Factors
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

ρt/ρ0

Τt

ACt

ANt

AGt

AXt

AMt

AIt

AIVt

B Kt

BKIVt

BLDt

BLBt

1.00000
1.13349
1.24491
1.31208
1.48175
1.742672.01192
2.11133
2.26726
2.570972.65093
2.986313.40364
3.83398
4.372844.774134.878635.274115.888735.65098
5.458495.656615.78191
6.11483
6.60374
6.564126.658406.80975
6.91157
7.23966
7.580677.83875
8.182098.74065
9.34560
9.8246410.1160
10.1874
10.0527
10.1182
10.2722
10.4624
10.5220
10.2075
10.081210.2647
10.1419
10.1898
10.2283
10.5641
10.858111.2932

1.00000
1.06216
1.11162
1.12789
1.24134
1.39590
1.540171.55483
1.64501
1.788991.79099
1.90974
2.054482.23553
2.41636
2.52757
2.497542.60887
2.738622.65056
2.648372.69395
2.70134
2.78370
2.945482.93718
2.91436
2.92815
2.887222.97965
3.04374
3.043293.08970
3.19004
3.30187
3.38504
3.39550
3.36884
3.301893.30629
3.32370
3.37440
3.39385
3.272313.25370
3.27797
3.26335
3.28906
3.30855
3.39872
3.49924
3.58265

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.00000
1.00065
1.00098
1.00101
1.00107
1.001311.001431.001421.00137
1.00188
1.00174
1.00198
1.00229
1.00239
1.00269
1.00328
1.00370
1.00423
1.00461
1.00483
1.00482
1.00494
1.00500
1.00496
1.005191.005161.00498
1.00497
1.00492
1.00492
1.00495
1.00499
1.00503
1.00508
1.005131.00537
1.00546
1.005431.00533
1.00538
1.005431.00547
1.00552
1.00560
1.00552
1.00552
1.00561
1.005441.00537
1.005441.00573
1.006131.00000
1.001101.001421.000150.99934
0.99853
0.997420.99554
0.99319
0.992090.99026
0.98968
0.98958
0.988640.98784
0.98669
0.984810.98305
0.982440.987590.98009
0.97920
0.97806
0.97624
0.97670
0.97852
0.97883
0.977850.977440.97678
0.97805
0.97557
0.97427
0.97326
0.97336
0.97361
0.97298
0.972450.971970.971190.970780.970470.970650.97056
0.970240.970280.970370.970460.970230.970420.970930.97174

1.00000
1.00404
1.00069
0.99252
0.99124
0.99103
0.98406
0.97427
0.969180.967510.95863
0.953830.950430.945140.94259
0.938420.93327
0.92592
0.924150.93159
0.92301
0.912930.89799
0.88455
0.88994
0.89173
0.88987
0.89169
0.884240.883140.875880.85832
0.85368
0.851620.853140.852390.84780
0.843880.83654
0.833450.83187
0.835190.83594
0.837910.828540.82469
0.82832
0.828840.82575
0.82601
0.829830.838311.00000
0.99244
0.99168
1.01265
1.01756
1.02091
1.02687
1.036901.04323
1.04479
1.05440
1.05829
1.063971.07000
1.07071
1.07637
1.08827
1.09982
1.09133
1.05236
1.055131.06078
1.07671
1.10318
1.07374
1.03565
1.042121.041811.05367
1.06108
1.07208
1.11469
1.12293
1.12609
1.12104
1.11608
1.123641.13082
1.13987
1.14436
1.14609
1.13880
1.13289
1.13569
1.14553
1.14284
1.13866
1.13809
1.13836
1.13197
1.11595
1.09826

1.00000
1.01873
1.02629
1.01772
1.00799
1.00555
1.00986
0.99379
0.971130.967460.95008
0.948700.951360.94475
0.94632
0.938240.92267
0.91826
0.933540.92834
0.903310.886540.87792
0.87451
0.88587
0.885270.876780.87094
0.86457
0.858630.85172
0.84505
0.843280.84494
0.84872
0.84982
0.84749
0.84398
0.841440.838160.837210.83335
0.830020.82589
0.82155
0.82226
0.81763
0.81583
0.81504
0.817190.81871
0.82271

1.00000
1.00309
1.00161
1.00119
1.000910.99938
0.99547
0.99273
0.990960.990500.989310.98857
0.98751
0.98649
0.98668
0.985250.984370.98456
0.98583
0.98378
0.983220.983220.983140.98326
0.98361
0.98271
0.98237
0.98234
0.982390.982360.98206
0.98208
0.98206
0.982070.98203
0.98192
0.98184
0.98185
0.98194
0.982020.98201
0.98200
0.98191
0.981900.98187
0.98182
0.98195
0.98192
0.98186
0.981810.98187
0.982131.00000
1.00105
1.01006
1.02530
1.03971
1.05624
1.08305
1.11693
1.14919
1.17997
1.213281.240811.27082
1.30696
1.34765
1.391451.437541.474631.50916
1.54514
1.57135
1.59228
1.61198
1.631811.655911.68071
1.70456
1.72700
1.74738
1.766731.80035
1.83088
1.86450
1.89461
1.92809
1.96568
2.003132.03780
2.06298
2.078072.08936
2.10393
2.12253
2.14155
2.15379
2.16418
2.178392.19136
2.19869
2.208112.21855
2.23389

1.00000
1.00232
1.00513
1.00759
1.00833
1.01084
1.01375
1.018131.01986
1.022291.02477
1.026421.02836
1.031441.034311.03696
1.03904
1.03938
1.03960
1.04091
1.04203
1.04175
1.04206
1.04194
1.04173
1.04293
1.04368
1.04388
1.04401
1.04383
1.04407
1.044221.04408
1.044171.04428
1.044631.04483
1.04492
1.044931.04482
1.04473
1.04486
1.04504
1.045191.045191.044961.04498
1.044811.04472
1.04457
1.044411.04477

1.00000
1.00037
1.00123
1.00228
1.004071.005371.01055
1.015761.02080
1.02613
1.03332
1.04927
1.065101.07179
1.088211.09649
1.10334
1.11067
1.12561
1.13490
1.14225
1.14651
1.15307
1.15750
1.16124
1.16526
1.16732
1.17015
1.17251
1.17308
1.17654
1.17715
1.179281.18192
1.184071.18674
1.18800
1.19063
1.19294
1.19490
1.19607
1.19773
1.199281.201011.20159
1.202681.203471.20389
1.20485
1.20471
1.20485
1.206031.00000
1.04230
1.07745
1.09579
1.11386
1.14406
1.16033
1.183141.190481.20589
1.222441.24645
1.263101.27084
1.27819
1.291641.30058
1.30736
1.329371.31486
1.29449
1.330021.34816
1.357071.37027
1.38552
1.40124
1.41259
1.44101
1.44879
1.46016
1.471641.48547
1.50696
1.52387
1.53425
1.54670
1.54426
1.53936
1.54045
1.54883
1.55195
1.54856
1.54205
1.53494
1.55238
1.53670
1.52588
1.52384
1.52977
1.530541.54139

4.3 The Decomposition of Deflated NDP Growth
There is a severe flaw with all of the analysis presented in the previous sections. The problem is that
depreciation payments are part of the user cost of capital for each asset but depreciation does not provide
households with any sustainable purchasing power. Hence our real income measure defined by (5) aboveis overstated.
To see why Gross Domestic Product overstates income, consider the model of production that is
described by the following quotations:20

“We must look at the production process during a period of time, with a beginning and an end. It starts, at the commencement of the
Period, with an Initial Capital Stock; to this there is applied a Flow Input of labour, and from it there emerges a Flow Output called
Consumption; then there is a Closing Stock of Capital left over at the end. If Inputs are the things that are put in, the Outputs are thethings that are got out, and the production of the Period is considered in isolation, then the Initial Capital Stock is an Input. A Stock Input
to the Flow Input of labour; and further (what is less well recognized in the tradition, but is equally clear when we are strict withtranslation), the Closing Capital Stock is an Output, a Stock Output to match the Flow Output of Consumption Goods. Both input andoutput have stock and flow components; capital appears both as input and as output” John R. Hicks (1961; 23).
“The business firm can be viewed as a receptacle into which factors of production, or inputs, flow and out of which outputs flow...The
total of the inputs with which the firm can work within the time period specified includes those inherited from the previous period andthose acquired during the current period. The total of the outputs of the business firm in the same period includes the amounts of outputs
currently sold and the amounts of inputs which are bequeathed to the firm in its succeeding period of activity.” Edgar O. Edwards andPhilip W. Bell (1961; 71-72).

Hicks and Edwards and Bell obviously had the same model of production in mind: in each accounting
period, the business unit combines the capital stocks and goods in process that it has inherited from theprevious period with “flow” inputs purchased in the current period (such as labour, materials, services
and additional durable inputs) to produce current period “flow” outputs as well as end of the period
depreciated capital stock components which are regarded as outputs from the perspective of the current
period (but will be regarded as inputs from the perspective of the next period). 45
All of the “flow” inputs that are purchased during the period and all of the “flow” outputs that are soldduring the period are the inputs and outputs that appear in the usual definition of cash flow. These are
the flow inputs and outputs that are very familiar to national income accountants. But this is not the endof the story: the firm inherits an endowment of assets at the beginning of the production period and at theend of the period, the firm will have the net profit or loss that has occurred due to its sales of outputs andits purchases of inputs during the period. As well, it will have a stock of assets that it can use when it
starts production in the following period. Just focusing on the flow transactions that occur within the
production period will not give a complete picture of the firm’s productive activities. Hence, to get acomplete picture of the firm’s production activities over the course of a period, it is necessary to add thevalue of the closing stock of assets less the beginning of the period stock of assets to the cash flow that
accrued to the firm from its sales and purchases of market goods and services during the accounting
period.
We illustrate the above theory by considering a very simple two output, two input model of the market
sector. One of the outputs is output in year t, Yt and the other output is an investment good, It. One of the
inputs is the flow of noncapital primary input Xt and the other input is Kt, capital services. Suppose thatthe average prices during period t of a unit of Yt, Xt and It are PYt, PXt and PIt respectively. Suppose
further that the interest rate prevailing at the beginning of period t is rt. The value of the beginning of
period t capital stock is assumed to be PIt, the investment price for period t. The user cost of capital iscalculated such as ut = (rt + δt + τt)PIt/(1+rt). As usual, it represents price of capital services input. Thus,
the period t profit of the market sector is expressed as follows:(54) ∏t = PYt Yt + PIt It − PXt Xt − [(rt* + δ)PIt/(1+rt*)]Kt
Under the assumption of constant returns to scale, a zero profit condition should be satisfied such as ∏t =0. Using this condition, we obtain the following value of output equals value of input equation:
45

For more on this model of production and additional references to the literature, see the Appendices inDiewert (1977) (1980). The usual user cost of capital can be derived from this framework if depreciation is
independent of use.

21

(55) PYt Yt + PIt It = PXt Xt + [(rt* + δ)PIt/(1+rt*)]Kt.
Equation (55) is essentially the closed economy counterpart to the (gross) value of outputs equals (gross)value of primary inputs equation (4), Pt⋅yt = Wt⋅xt, that we have been using thus far in this study. We
now come to the point of this rather long digression: the (gross) payments to primary inputs that isdefined by the right hand side of (55) is not income, in the sense of Hicks. 46 The owner of a unit ofcapital cannot spend the entire period t gross rental income (rt* + δ)PIt/(1+rt*) on consumption during
period t because the depreciation portion of the rental, δPIt/(1+rt*), is required in order to keep his or her
capital intact. Thus the owner of a new unit of capital at the beginning of period t loans the unit to themarket sector and gets the gross return (rt* + δ)PIt at the end of the period plus the depreciated unit of theinitial capital stock, which is worth only (1 − δ)PIt. Thus δPIt of this gross return must be set aside inorder to restore the lender of the capital services to his or her original wealth position at the beginning of
period t. This means that period t Hicksian market sector income is not the value of payments to primary
inputs, PXt Xt + [(rt* + δ)pKt/(1+rt*)]Kt; instead it is the value of payments to labour PXt Xt plus the reward
for waiting, rt(1+rt*)−1PIt Kt. Using this definition of market sector (net) Hicksian income, we canrearrange equation (55) as follows:(56) Hicksian market sector income ≡ PXt Xt + [rt*PIt/(1+rt*)]Kt= PYt Yt + PIt It – [δPIt/(1+rt*)]Kt= Value of consumption + value of gross investment − value of depreciation.
Thus in this Hicksian net income framework, our new output concept is equal to our old output concept
less the value of depreciation. We take the price of depreciation to be the corresponding investment pricePIt/(1+rt*) and the quantity of depreciation is taken to be the depreciation rate times the beginning of theperiod stock, δKt.
Hence the overstatement of income problem that is implicit in the approaches used in previous sections
can readily be remedied: all we need to do is to take the user cost formula for an asset and decompose it
into two parts:• One part that represents depreciation and foreseen obsolescence, [δPIt/(1+rt*)] and• The remaining part that is the reward for postponing consumption, [rt*PIt/(1+rt*)].
Thus in this section, we split up each user cost times the beginning of the period stock Kt into thedepreciation component δtPIt Kt/(1+rt*) and the remaining term rt*PIt Kt/(1+rt*) and we regard the second
term as a genuine income component but the first term is treated as an intermediate input cost for themarket sector and is an offset to gross investment made by the market sector during the period underconsideration. Thus in this section, we use a net product approach instead of a gross product approach.
Using the chained Törnqvist indexes, we construct prices and quantities of net investment PNI and yNI
and “reward for waiting” capital service WKW and xKW. Waiting capital services is compared with thegross user cost concept that was used in the previous section and net investment is also compared withthe gross investment that was used in the previous section in Table 5.

46

We will use Hicks’ third concept of income here: “Income No. 3 must be defined as the maximum amountof money which the individual can spend this week, and still be able to expect to spend this week, and still beable to expect to spend the same amount in real terms in each ensuing week.” J.R. Hicks (1946; 174).

22

Table 5: The Quantity and Price of Gross Investment, Depreciation, Net Investment, CapitalServices, Waiting Capital Services (Billion Yen)
Price
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

t

t

Quantity (Billion Yen)

PI

t

PDEP

PNI

WK

t

1.00000
1.07799
1.14109
1.10682
1.10405
1.128291.21004
1.238541.244141.26349
1.28734
1.33294
1.38867
1.43398
1.49314
1.56182
1.59780
1.66695
1.93393
2.356032.45132
2.556402.667782.75156
2.94182
3.17585
3.233513.247543.23932
3.246213.22575
3.16676
3.14805
3.17482
3.27023
3.361093.409073.41971
3.41945
3.390643.36629
3.32070
3.318373.24082
3.16801
3.155413.06560
2.99256
2.95501
2.93996
2.92164
2.92143

1.00000
1.08721
1.14761
1.11161
1.09675
1.10570
1.154481.185311.18040
1.18969
1.21372
1.23593
1.270171.301131.352311.41349
1.45652
1.49897
1.69176
2.07893
2.165472.21795
2.31160
2.347232.454272.623222.669392.69077
2.691652.67898
2.65333
2.601392.57426
2.58387
2.64125
2.703932.73132
2.71846
2.716842.683072.65458
2.60818
2.602612.553982.49092
2.47382
2.40580
2.33766
2.299022.27683
2.26257
2.25767

1.00000
1.066121.13173
1.09892
1.10505
1.13793
1.23377
1.26124
1.27148
1.29534
1.31904
1.37618
1.44196
1.493631.55589
1.62780
1.66051
1.743022.04680
2.48283
2.581542.72275
2.84373
2.96204
3.209403.486263.55086
3.55677
3.539593.56806
3.55574
3.49460
3.48775
3.531033.65851
3.77132
3.83735
3.87573
3.877483.86265
3.85114
3.81762
3.821423.70733
3.63751
3.641233.531543.480813.47025
3.49023
3.46898
3.48479

1.00000
1.08161
1.15653
1.080421.15135
1.27192
1.435121.41653
1.44733
1.50726
1.48358
1.56655
1.64674
1.72862
1.77624
1.808371.69082
1.683111.88069
2.15972
2.11392
2.28015
2.349652.48908
2.71382
2.81250
2.779442.74332
2.689512.79480
2.84526
2.791912.75174
2.797032.87274
2.87684
2.83166
2.79504
2.696102.65853
2.642682.65433
2.638362.47774
2.428112.451812.345022.34143
2.341982.43956
2.463642.49213

W KW

t1.00000
1.07844
1.170481.05124
1.20888
1.447011.73040
1.66303
1.73583
1.85305
1.77699
1.93556
2.07157
2.218402.259422.25461
1.92477
1.84804
2.04261
2.17078
1.93697
2.252452.28287
2.558642.93883
2.94160
2.794372.672132.542862.81058
2.960142.90471
2.83995
2.93699
3.03669
2.946842.766802.68280
2.41883
2.37547
2.383392.49388
2.44704
2.060322.03498
2.14269
1.97380
2.08505
2.165362.468122.55840
2.62133

yI

t

yDEP

1618.4
1988.72412.52535.63008.64052
5029.45640.16310.17336.97588.38684
10287.3
12291
14427
16752.8
17456.3
19076.6
21347.3
20167.9
19934.3
20778.2
21328.223133.3
24385.924263.4
24822.4
24950.224680.825790.927998.7
29876.432167.1
36212.4
39757.1
43019.1
44374.543485.7
42072
41379.641469.1
43418.8
43705
40831
40551.4
40711.3
40616.938907.7
38694.3
39364.840880.3
41472.3

1014.31011
1048.71123.21202.21298.81475.41725.5
1985.92255.82575
2856.63201.83670.54264.34977.75823.46559.77319.58136.78725.59212.69693.710221
10900.911599.4
12300.913010
13690.6
14377.2
15625.916870.7
18227
19519.3
21074.1
22891.8
24723.4
26464.2
27702.828389.3
28879.829601.930628.2
31689.1
32389.7
32990.1
33852.7
34637.935060.535629.736247.4
37191.6

t

t

t

yNI

xK

604.1
979.8
1369.11417.6
1812.62755.63552.13917
4330.85084.75036.55845.77086.88602.610138.911751.3
11689
12602.814120.3
12324.911609.5
12004.2
12128.813390
14016.7
13375.1
13356.5
12938.6
12176.2
12669.713740.1
14515
15581
18275.820323.2
21926.921824.6
19807
17691.7
16603.4
16341.5
17543.3
17092.1
13862.4
13137.3
12866.3
12196.5
10187.9
9721.99915.710788.6
10672.62065.12076.32147.32277.12411.52577.92866.33259.53670.94099.44605
5059.85600.36314
7203.78270.89524.710657.7
11817.613080.5
14043.914859.3
15660.7
16499.3
17535.7
18619.9
19704.4
20776.721793.6
22791.1
24562.3
26236.4
28155
29943.832011.1
34442.3
36987.639419.1
41217.3
42313.843143.2
44223
45616.1
47059.547991.748780.7
49868.4
50860.8
51413.1
52113
52877.7
54003.3

xKW

t1050.91065.31098.71153.81209.51281.61402.81562.71730.7
1907.92116.52307.92529.82816.73169.23589.74072.94524.14979.95481.95896
6258.16610.96957.1
7362
7796.68227.68637.79016.69370.99981.110504.411164.911757.3
12392.1
13144.1
13985.5
14791.7
15433.7
15900
16284.3
16692.4
17121
17559
17817.5
18030.3
18282.9
18517.1
18667.8
18831.4
19022.4
19276.9

Note that the price of net investment increases much more rapidly than that of the gross investment. The
explanation for this fact is as follows. Machinery and equipment investment has increased much morethan structures investment in Japan similar to the situation in most countries. But due to the computer
chip revolution, the price of M&E equipment declined much more rapidly than the price of structures(which tended to increase). But structures have a low depreciation rate and machinery and equipment
items have high depreciation rates. Thus when we subtract depreciation from gross investment, theweight of M&E is reduced in the net investment aggregate relative to the weight of structures, thus
leading to a much higher rate of overall price increase in the net investment aggregate. Note that theprice of waiting capital services increases much more rapidly than the other investment prices. This ismainly due to the fact that land services are included in the capital services but there is no investment inland. Hence, the situation is explained by the fact that land prices in Japan have been increasing much
more rapidly than the prices of investment goods over most of the sample period. Note that grossinvestment in Japan grew 25.625 fold over the sample period whereas net investment grew only 17.667

23

fold. Note that (traditional) capital services input in Japan grew 26.15 fold over the sample period
whereas waiting capital services grew only 18.343 fold.
All of the analysis presented in the previous section 4.2 above applies to the new situation with obvious
modifications. The counterpart to Table 3 in the previous section using the new framework is Table 6
below.
Table 6: The Decomposition of Market Sector Net Real Income Growth into Translog Productivity,
Real Output Price Change, and Input Quantity Contribution Factors
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

ρt

τt

αCt

αNt

αGt

αXt

αMt

αIt

αDEPt

αIVt

βKWt

βKIVt

βLDt

βLBt

1.14088
1.10370
1.05619
1.14446
1.19128
1.15837
1.041481.07436
1.136141.02485
1.13143
1.14272
1.12764
1.13779
1.08599
1.00869
1.07878
1.11456
0.938960.96009
1.04497
1.02205
1.06262
1.079850.98487
1.011401.01951
1.01182
1.052171.045401.030701.03929
1.06758
1.06637
1.04477
1.022140.998150.975781.00588
1.01641
1.021171.00218
0.95769
0.983811.01818
0.98282
1.00308
1.00353
1.03598
1.02891
1.03991

1.07195
1.05366
1.01678
1.11490
1.14047
1.115421.01049
1.06487
1.09805
1.00109
1.074421.08478
1.09836
1.09030
1.05123
0.98574
1.050451.057210.96274
0.998171.02008
1.00293
1.035191.06755
0.99673
0.99068
1.00537
0.983441.03756
1.024910.99952
1.01782
1.038421.04156
1.02987
1.003420.99027
0.97559
1.00157
1.006481.01869
1.00694
0.955810.99294
1.00932
0.99435
1.00988
1.00747
1.03437
1.03725
1.02988

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.00075
1.00037
1.00004
1.000071.00027
1.000121.00000
0.99994
1.00057
0.99984
1.00027
1.00035
1.000101.00034
1.00065
1.00047
1.00059
1.000441.000240.99999
1.000141.000070.99995
1.00026
0.99997
0.999800.99999
0.99994
1.00000
1.000031.00005
1.00005
1.00006
1.00006
1.00028
1.000100.999960.99988
1.00005
1.000071.00005
1.00006
1.00009
0.99991
1.00000
1.000110.999780.99991
1.00009
1.000361.00049

1.00126
1.00037
0.998560.99908
0.99909
0.99878
0.997900.99738
0.99877
0.99795
0.99934
0.99989
0.99894
0.99911
0.998700.99786
0.99798
0.99929
1.006020.99118
0.99894
0.99866
0.99785
1.00054
1.00216
1.00036
0.998830.999510.999221.00151
0.99704
0.99843
0.99878
1.000131.00030
0.999230.999350.999400.99902
0.999480.99961
1.000230.99989
0.99958
1.00006
1.000111.000120.99971
1.00024
1.00065
1.001021.00463
0.996200.99071
0.99855
0.99976
0.992220.98897
0.99420
0.99808
0.98978
0.99443
0.99604
0.99383
0.99701
0.99509
0.99383
0.99109
0.99784
1.00925
0.989310.98733
0.981110.98276
1.00702
1.00232
0.99758
1.00238
0.99023
0.99855
0.99047
0.97660
0.993640.99718
1.00208
0.99896
0.993630.994450.98946
0.995480.997691.00483
1.00109
1.00287
0.986140.994221.005481.00079
0.99533
1.00040
1.00573
1.01254

0.99133
0.999131.024091.005481.00367
1.006461.01084
1.00679
1.00166
1.01025
1.004111.00597
1.006291.00074
1.00588
1.012421.01201
0.99125
0.959101.00306
1.006221.01738
1.028420.96935
0.95910
1.00726
0.99965
1.01334
1.008221.01205
1.04660
1.00868
1.003310.99476
0.994811.00803
1.00766
1.00973
1.004811.00185
0.992310.99372
1.003021.01078
0.99708
0.995440.99938
1.00029
0.99300
0.982510.98060

1.02152
1.008470.990500.989220.997291.00475
0.982370.97466
0.995800.98003
0.99838
1.003120.992291.001840.99052
0.98138
0.99460
1.01888
0.99363
0.96875
0.97847
0.98877
0.99551
1.014960.99918
0.988810.99220
0.99144
0.991990.99066
0.990850.99754
1.002311.005231.00153
0.99674
0.99505
0.99634
0.99523
0.998620.99443
0.99516
0.99392
0.993481.00108
0.992990.99724
0.99878
1.00329
1.002311.00599

0.98732
0.99660
1.00424
1.00582
1.00250
1.001461.00456
1.00829
1.00204
1.00577
1.00240
1.000631.00294
0.99969
1.002531.00428
1.003390.998221.00072
1.011191.01101
1.004441.00408
0.99802
1.00183
1.00446
1.00257
1.003191.00471
1.004691.00425
1.00187
0.999820.999211.000121.002171.00379
1.00187
1.00335
1.00156
1.00385
1.00284
1.00235
1.00445
1.00005
1.004141.00292
1.00184
0.99892
0.99850
0.99657

1.00355
0.99832
0.99952
0.99969
0.99830
0.99567
0.99696
0.99801
0.99948
0.99867
0.999170.998810.99885
1.000210.998400.99899
1.000231.00146
0.997610.99935
1.00000
0.99991
1.000141.000410.99895
0.999590.99997
1.00006
0.999960.99965
1.00002
0.99998
1.00001
0.99995
0.99988
0.99990
1.00001
1.000111.000100.99999
0.99998
0.99989
0.99999
0.999960.99994
1.000170.999960.99992
0.99993
1.00008
1.00033

1.00187
1.00490
1.00726
1.00670
1.008451.01387
1.01677
1.01558
1.01496
1.01575
1.01297
1.01377
1.016101.01747
1.01795
1.01706
1.01302
1.01139
1.01133
1.00818
1.00658
1.006211.00591
1.00705
1.007421.00676
1.00586
1.00499
1.00453
1.007891.00648
1.00770
1.00655
1.00673
1.00742
1.00752
1.00670
1.00499
1.003421.00279
1.00300
1.00315
1.00300
1.00170
1.001431.001681.00157
1.00107
1.00125
1.00155
1.00209

1.00268
1.003211.00280
1.00084
1.00278
1.003201.00480
1.00190
1.00266
1.002711.00180
1.002101.00334
1.00309
1.00286
1.00225
1.00037
1.000241.001451.001250.99969
1.000350.99986
0.999761.00134
1.00083
1.00023
1.000140.999811.00026
1.000170.99984
1.000111.000121.000391.00023
1.000111.00001
0.99987
0.99990
1.00015
1.000211.00018
1.00000
0.99973
1.000030.999800.99988
0.999820.999811.00043

1.00043
1.00098
1.00120
1.002031.00146
1.00571
1.00575
1.005541.00582
1.00784
1.01726
1.016811.00699
1.01705
1.00850
1.00703
1.007541.01530
1.00948
1.007531.00434
1.006621.00445
1.00372
1.00401
1.00206
1.00283
1.002361.00057
1.00345
1.00060
1.00213
1.002641.00216
1.002681.00127
1.00268
1.00235
1.00202
1.001201.00170
1.00158
1.00178
1.00060
1.001141.00082
1.000441.00101
0.99986
1.000141.00123

1.04900
1.03880
1.019481.01875
1.030421.01580
1.021901.006931.014441.01534
1.02197
1.014891.006811.006441.01175
1.00779
1.00592
1.019150.98747
0.98200
1.03198
1.015811.007641.01123
1.01290
1.013231.00947
1.023621.00633
1.009191.00923
1.01108
1.017101.013291.008101.00971
0.998100.996141.00086
1.00667
1.00247
0.99732
0.994810.99426
1.014220.98736
0.99116
0.99832
1.00489
1.000641.00890

Average

ρt

τt

αCt

αNt

αGt

αXt

αMt

αIt

αDEPt

αIVt

βKWt

βKIVt

βLDt

βLBt

1956-2006
1956-1973
1974-1979
1980-1990
1991-2001
2002-2006

1.04857
1.10552
1.01809
1.033990.99856
1.02228

1.02955
1.06556
1.014441.01508
0.99594
1.02377

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.000141.000291.000111.000021.000031.000130.99936
0.998900.99887
0.99966
0.999631.00035

0.99606
0.99513
0.99279
0.995450.99685
1.002961.00215
1.00547
0.99725
1.00434
1.002220.991160.99565
0.99587
0.99001
0.99561
0.99573
1.00152

1.002311.00182
1.00491
1.002431.002760.999750.999610.999130.99957
0.99982
1.00000
1.00004

1.00765
1.01255
1.007541.00658
1.00358
1.00151

1.00097
1.002421.000391.000291.00004
0.99995

1.00421
1.00740
1.00602
1.00232
1.00156
1.000541.00982
1.018091.00602
1.012141.000171.00078

The growth rate of real net income ρt is decomposed into the product of a productivity growth factor τt,
several factors of real output price change αCt, αNt, αGt, αXt, αMt, αIt, αDEPt, and αIVt, and several factors of
input quantity growth βKWt, βKIVt, βLDt, and βLBt. The new results are quite interesting. In the previous real
income model, the average rate of increase in real income ρt was 5% per year, which has now decreased
by 0.143% per year to 4.857%. More importantly, there are some big shifts in the explanatory factors.
The productivity growth factor τt now accounts for an average contribution of 2.955% per year24compared to the old 2.595%, an increase of 0.36 percentage points per year. The contribution of (gross)capital services growth βKt has significantly decreased from 1.592% per year to the waiting capital
services contribution factor βKWt of 0.765% per year, a decrease of 0.827 percentage points per year. The
contribution of labour input growth βLBt has marginally increased from 0.858% per year to 0.982% per
year. The contributions of real export price αXt and real import prices αMt remain quite similar estimatesin the previous analysis. Thus, as we stated in the previous analysis, the effects of changes in the termsof trade on living standards were negligible for Japan over the entire periods 1955-2006 but the terms oftrade has larger impacts during shorter periods of time. It accounted for −1% of the average growth rateof real income during the stagnation period between oil shocks (1973-1979) and −0.591% during theperiod of economic recovery (2002-2006). The negative contribution of the change in real investment
prices αIt equal to −0.434% is offset by the positive contribution of the change in real depreciation prices
αDEPt equal to 0.231%. Finally, note that the TFP productivity recovery in the 2002-2006 period is quite
striking. Using the gross model, average TFP growth during this period was 1.9% per year and using thenet model, average TFP growth increases to a very respectable 2.2% per year. This is good news for theJapanese economy.
Table 7: The Decomposition of Market Sector Net Real Income Cumulative Growth into
Productivity, Real Output Price Change, and Input Quantity Contribution Factors using theTranslog Net Product Approach
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

ρt/ρ0

Τt

ACt

ANt

AGt

AXt

AMt

AIt

ADEPt

AIVt

BKWt

BKIVt

BLDt

BLBt

1.00000
1.14088
1.25918
1.32994
1.52206
1.81320
2.10035
2.187482.350132.670092.736443.09608
3.53795
3.989544.53924
4.92955
4.972395.36409
5.97860
5.61369
5.389655.632025.75619
6.116646.605076.50515
6.57932
6.707696.78696
7.141037.465217.69438
7.996678.53708
9.10371
9.51128
9.721829.703819.46876
9.524479.68075
9.88566
9.907219.48803
9.334449.504129.340879.36961
9.402689.7409610.0226
10.4226

1.00000
1.07195
1.12946
1.148411.28036
1.460221.62875
1.64584
1.75260
1.924441.92652
2.06990
2.245372.466232.68892
2.82668
2.78638
2.92694
3.094402.979102.97366
3.03337
3.04226
3.149313.36205
3.35106
3.31982
3.337633.28236
3.405633.490473.48878
3.55097
3.68740
3.840643.95535
3.96889
3.93027
3.834313.84033
3.86520
3.937433.96474
3.78953
3.76280
3.79786
3.77638
3.81370
3.84218
3.97425
4.12228
4.24547

1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000

1.00000
1.00075
1.001121.001161.001231.00150
1.001621.001621.00156
1.002131.001961.00224
1.00259
1.00269
1.00303
1.00368
1.00415
1.00475
1.005191.005431.005421.00556
1.005631.00559
1.00585
1.005811.00561
1.00560
1.005541.005541.00557
1.005621.00566
1.00573
1.00579
1.006071.00618
1.006141.00602
1.006071.006141.006191.00625
1.00634
1.00625
1.00624
1.00636
1.006141.00605
1.006141.00650
1.00700

1.00000
1.00126
1.001631.000190.99927
0.998360.997140.99505
0.99244
0.991220.98918
0.98853
0.988430.98738
0.98650
0.985220.983120.981130.980430.98633
0.977640.97660
0.97529
0.973190.97372
0.97582
0.97618
0.97504
0.97456
0.97379
0.97526
0.972380.970850.96967
0.96979
0.97008
0.96934
0.968700.968120.967170.96667
0.96630
0.96652
0.966410.96601
0.96606
0.966170.96628
0.96600
0.96623
0.966860.96785

1.00000
1.004631.000810.99152
0.99008
0.98984
0.982140.971310.96567
0.96382
0.95397
0.948650.944900.93906
0.936250.93165
0.925910.91766
0.91568
0.924150.91427
0.90268
0.885630.870360.87646
0.87850
0.87637
0.87846
0.86987
0.868610.86033
0.840200.83486
0.832510.834240.83338
0.828070.82347
0.81479
0.811100.80923
0.813140.81403
0.816370.805050.800400.804780.805410.801650.80197
0.80657
0.81668

1.00000
0.99133
0.990461.01433
1.01988
1.023631.03024
1.041411.048481.050221.06099
1.06535
1.07171
1.078441.079231.08558
1.09907
1.11227
1.10254
1.057451.06068
1.06727
1.08582
1.11668
1.08246
1.038191.04572
1.04536
1.05930
1.068011.08087
1.13124
1.14106
1.14484
1.13883
1.13292
1.142011.15076
1.16196
1.16756
1.16971
1.16072
1.15344
1.15692
1.16939
1.16598
1.16066
1.159941.16028
1.15216
1.13200
1.11004

1.00000
1.02152
1.030171.02038
1.00938
1.00665
1.011440.99360
0.968420.96435
0.94509
0.94356
0.94650
0.939210.94094
0.932020.91466
0.90972
0.926890.92098
0.892200.87299
0.863190.859310.872160.871450.861700.85498
0.84766
0.84087
0.833020.825400.82337
0.825270.82958
0.830850.828150.82405
0.82103
0.817120.81599
0.811450.807520.80261
0.79738
0.79824
0.792640.79046
0.78949
0.792100.79392
0.79868

1.00000
0.98732
0.98396
0.988140.99389
0.99637
0.99782
1.002381.01068
1.01275
1.01859
1.02103
1.02168
1.02468
1.02436
1.02695
1.03135
1.03485
1.03301
1.03375
1.04532
1.05683
1.06151
1.06584
1.06373
1.06568
1.070431.07319
1.07661
1.08168
1.08675
1.09136
1.09341
1.09321
1.09234
1.092481.09485
1.09899
1.10105
1.10473
1.10645
1.11071
1.11386
1.11647
1.12144
1.12149
1.126131.129421.13149
1.13027
1.12857
1.12469

1.00000
1.00355
1.00186
1.00137
1.001070.99936
0.99503
0.99200
0.99003
0.98952
0.988200.98738
0.986200.985070.98528
0.98370
0.98271
0.982930.984360.98201
0.98138
0.98138
0.981290.981420.981820.98079
0.980390.980360.980410.980380.98004
0.98006
0.98004
0.98005
0.98000
0.979880.97978
0.97979
0.979900.98000
0.97999
0.979970.97987
0.97986
0.979810.97975
0.97992
0.979880.979810.97974
0.979820.980141.00000
1.00187
1.006781.014091.02089
1.02951
1.04379
1.06129
1.07782
1.09395
1.111171.12559
1.14109
1.15946
1.17972
1.20090
1.22139
1.23728
1.25137
1.26555
1.27590
1.28430
1.29228
1.299911.30908
1.31879
1.32771
1.33549
1.34215
1.34823
1.35887
1.36768
1.37820
1.38723
1.39657
1.40694
1.41752
1.42701
1.434131.43904
1.44304
1.44737
1.45193
1.456291.45876
1.46085
1.463311.46561
1.46718
1.46901
1.471291.47437

1.00000
1.00268
1.00590
1.00872
1.00957
1.01238
1.015621.02049
1.022431.02515
1.02792
1.02977
1.03194
1.03538
1.03858
1.04155
1.043901.04428
1.04453
1.04605
1.04736
1.04703
1.04740
1.04725
1.04700
1.048411.04928
1.04952
1.04967
1.04947
1.04974
1.04992
1.04975
1.04986
1.049991.050411.05065
1.05077
1.05077
1.050641.050531.05068
1.05090
1.05109
1.051091.05080
1.05083
1.050621.05050
1.050311.050111.05056

1.00000
1.000431.001411.00261
1.004641.006111.01185
1.01767
1.02330
1.02925
1.03732
1.055221.07295
1.08045
1.09887
1.108211.11600
1.12441
1.14161
1.15243
1.16111
1.16615
1.17387
1.17909
1.183481.18823
1.19068
1.19405
1.19687
1.19755
1.20169
1.202421.20498
1.208161.21077
1.21401
1.21555
1.21880
1.221671.224141.22560
1.22769
1.229631.231821.23256
1.23396
1.234971.23551
1.23676
1.23658
1.23676
1.23828

1.00000
1.04900
1.08970
1.11093
1.13176
1.16618
1.184611.21055
1.21893
1.23653
1.25550
1.28309
1.30219
1.31106
1.31950
1.33500
1.34540
1.35336
1.37927
1.36199
1.33747
1.38024
1.402071.41278
1.428641.447071.466211.480091.51505
1.524631.53864
1.55285
1.57005
1.59690
1.618121.631221.64706
1.64393
1.63758
1.63900
1.64993
1.65400
1.64957
1.64100
1.63158
1.65478
1.63387
1.619421.61669
1.62459
1.62563
1.6401025

The annual change information in the previous table can be converted into cumulative changes using
equations (48). Table 7 gives this cumulative growth information.
The level of real net income ρt compared to its level in 1955 ρ0 is decomposed into the product of the
cumulative level of productivity factor Tt, the cumulative levels of several real output price factors ACt,
ANt, AGt, AXt, AMt, AIt, ADEPt, and AIVt, and the cumulative levels of several input quantity growth factors
BKWt, BKIVt, BLDt, and BLBt. Over the 52 year period, real net income ρt/ρ0 grew about 10.4 fold (10.4226).
The main (multiplicative) explanatory factors were productivity growth (4.24547), the growth in labour
input BLBt makes the next largest contribution (1.6401) followed by the growth in waiting capital
services BKWt (1.47437) and the growth in land input BLDt (1.23828). There were smaller effects due tothe relative change in the output prices such as the contribution of the change in real depreciation prices
ADEPt (1.12469), real export prices AXt (0.81668) and real import prices AMt (1.11004). The combined
effects of cumulative changes in the output prices relative to the price of household consumption were
negligible (0.94832) over the entire sample period.
5. Conclusion
On a theoretical level, the results of Diewert and Morrison (1986) were modified to give an exact
decomposition of the growth in real incomes generated by the market sector. Empirically, we analyzed
the contribution to Japanese living standards by the income generated by the market sector. First, weconstructed a database of inputs and outputs of market sector. Second, we took measured conventional
TFP growth approach by applying Fisher quantity indexes. We calculated traditional TFP under the casewhere land and inventories included as primary inputs and two other cases where these two inputs were
excluded. Our results showed the importance of the inclusion of land stocks and inventory stocks when
computing TFP growth rates. 47 Third, we applied our theoretical results to decompose the growth ofJapanese real income into the contributions of changes in real output prices and changes in primary input
quantities. We observed that productivity growth and the growth of capital services are the main
contributors to real income growth when using a traditional user cost approach to the pricing of primary
inputs. We also observed that changes in the terms of trade had very small effects on real income on
average. Forth, we moved to our theoretically preferred measure of real net income. We applied ourtheoretical results to decompose the growth of Japanese real net income into the contributions of changes
in real output prices and changes in input quantities. We observed that in this net approach, productivity
growth was still the largest contributor (and was an even more important factor than before). However,the contribution of capital services was greatly reduced in this net income context, becoming smaller
than the contribution of labour input.
A few problems with our approach should be mentioned:• Our labour aggregate has not been sufficiently disaggregated to capture changes in the average
quality of labour input over time. Characteristics such as education, sex, age and experienceshould be taken into account when constructing a measure of aggregate labour input.
• We included non-profit institutes serving households (NPISHs) as part of our market sector.
However, goods and services produced by NPISHs are traded free or at prices that are noteconomically significant. Since our theoretical approach relies on competitive profit
maximizing behaviour, NPISHs should be netted out of the market sector.
• We have not dealt with intangible assets and the problems associated with accounting for R&D
investments.

47

Nomura (2004) also made this observation. We noted also that balancing real rates of return were greatly
exaggerated when inventory and land inputs were omitted.

26

•

We were not able to provide a sectoral contributions analysis. Since a primary focus of ourpaper was to look at the effects of changes in the prices of exports and imports on living
standards, we could not extend our analysis to industrial sectors because reliable data on exports
by industry and imports used by industry are not available.

However, it would be straightforward to extend our analysis to data sets where a more detailed
breakdown of exports and imports by commodity classification is available. This would enable
researchers to give more precise estimates of the effects on the income produced by the market sector ofan oil shock or any other unusual movement in the prices of internationally traded goods.

27Appendix A. Data Construction
In this appendix, we explain our methods for data construction in detail. The main data sources are theJapanese national accounts and the KEO database and these sources will often not be explicitly
acknowledged in what follows.
1. Final Demand Components other than Gross Capital Formation
There are five price and quantity series for final demand components other than investments andinventory changes in our database:• C; Domestic final consumption expenditure of households (excluding the imputed rent ofowner-occupied dwellings);• N; Final consumption expenditure of private non-profit institutions serving households;• G; Net purchases of goods and services by the general government;• X; Exports of goods and services (including direct purchases in the domestic market by nonresident households);• M; Imports of goods and services (excluding direct purchases abroad by resident households).
1.1 Data Sources
Our output data series (other than for investments and inventory changes) are based on Japanese official
national accounts (JSNA), which has been published by the Economic and Social Research Institute of
the Cabinet of Office and the Economic Research Institute of the Economic Planning Agency of theJapanese Government. We call Japanese national accounts JSNA. In 1978, the Japanese system ofnational accounts was revised to comply with the guidelines proposed by the United Nations System of
National Accounts (1968 SNA). In 2000, it was revised to comply with the guidelines newly proposedby the United Nations System of National Accounts (1993 SNA). The Economic and Social ResearchInstitute and Economic Research Institute published separate historical data series based on 1968 SNA
and then later based on the 1993 SNA (but not extending back to 1955). Our basic strategy is to startwith the reference data series in the JSNA based on the 1993 SNA 48 and extend this series backwards byusing the growth rates of other data series in the 1968 JSNA. Before the 1968 JSNA was introduced, theJapanese national accounts were called National Income Statistics. Data from the National Income
Statistics are used only for constructing the imputed rent of owner-occupied houses. Publications weused are as follows;
National Income Statistics• Annual Report on National Report on National Income Statistics 1975, Economic Planning
Agency1968 JSNA• Report on National Accounts from 1955 to 1998, Economic and Social Research Institute,Cabinet Office• Annual Report on National Accounts of 2000, Economic Planning Agency
1993 JSNA• Annual Report on National Accounts of 2004-2008, Economic and Social Research Institute,Cabinet Office
1.2 Laspeyres Quantity Indexes and Subindexes
The Laspeyres quantity index (and therefore, a corresponding Paasche price index) is applied forconstructing quantity indexes everywhere in the Japanese national accounts. Therefore, we can48

In the future, we will abbreviate “the JSNA based on the 1993 SNA” to “the 1993 JSNA” and “the JSNA
based on the 1968 SNA” to “the 1968 JSNA”.

28

implicitly derive the price and quantity of a component from data series for the aggregate and all othercomponents. Suppose that 0 is the base year and there are two products, B and C. Further suppose thatthe statistical agency forms a fixed base Laspeyres quantity index that aggregates these two products into
the aggregate A say. The base period expenditure shares of products B and C are(A1) sB0 ≡ PB0QB0/[PB0QB0 + PC0QC0] = VB0/[VB0 + VC0] ;sC0 ≡ PC0QC0/[PB0QB0 + PC0QC0] = VC0/[VB0 + VC0] = 1 − sB0
where VB0 = PB0QB0 is the value of expenditures on product B in period 0 and PB0 and QB0 are thecorresponding price, etc. The price of A in period 0 can be set equal to 1 and the quantity of A in period
0 can be set equal to the expenditure on B and C in period 0. The value of the aggregate A in period t is
set equal to the sum of the expenditure values on B and C, VBt + VCt, so that putting this all together, we
have:(A2) PA0 = 1; VA0 ≡ VB0 + VC0 ≡ QA0 ; VAt ≡ VBt + VCt.
Use the Laspeyres quantity index formula to determine the period t quantity aggregate QAt and thecorresponding price PAt as follows:(A3) QAt/QA0 = sB0(QBt/QB0) + sC0(QCt/QC0) ; PAt = (VAt/VA0)/(QAt/QA0).
Now suppose that we have value series for A, B and C for periods 0 and t (so that in particular we cancalculate the shares defined by (A1) above), we know the statistical agency has used the equations in(A3) in order to calculate the price and quantity of A in period t, and we know the prices and quantities
for product A and B for periods 0 and t. Our problem is to calculate prices and quantities for product C.
We can set the price of product C in period 0 to 1 so that PC0 = 1 and set the quantity of product C inperiod 0 to the period 0 value, so that QC0 = VC0. Now use the first equation in (A3) to solve for QCt,
which is a straightforward linear equation in one unknown. Once QCt has been determined, thecorresponding price PCt can be set equal to (VCt/VC0)/(QCt/QC0). We found this data recovery technique
to be extremely useful in practice.
1.3 Domestic Final Consumption Expenditure of Households (C)For the years 1955-1998, current and constant yen series for Domestic Final Consumption Expenditureof Households are found in the Report on National Accounts from 1955 to 1998 (1968 JSNA); see Part 1
Flows, [1] Figures of Calendar Year, Ι Time Series Tables, 1 Arranged for Main Figures; Calendar Year,in billions of yen. The constant yen series is at the market prices of 1990. We use these series toconstruct price and quantity series for Domestic Final Consumption Expenditure of Households.
However, this aggregate consumption is the sum of market sector sales to households (our C) plus directpurchases abroad by resident households. Therefore, we need to use the technique described in section
1.2 above to remove the latter series.
Our target consumption aggregate also excludes the imputed expenditures on owner-occupied housing
and so we have to deduct these expenditures from the national accounts consumption aggregate as well.
We follow two steps in order to accomplish this task. First, we construct price and quantity series for
total housing consumption (rental expenses plus imputed owner-occupied expenses) from the data of the1968 JSNA series. Second, for the years prior to 1980, we divided the total housing expenses between
the owner-occupied houses and the rental houses based on their relative floor space. 49 We will explain
49

This is the procedure which had been adopted by Japanese national accounts until 2006.

29

how we estimated these relative floor spaces in the following section. For the years 1970-1998, we use
the current and constant yen series for the sum of rental and owner occupied housing using unpublisheddata from the 1968 JSNA. 50 For the years 1955-1973, current and constant yen series for total housing
expenses can be found in the Annual Report on National Income Statistics 1975; see Part 1 Basic
Accounts and Main Tables, 2 Figures of Calendar Year, Account 1 Gross National Product andExpenditure. From these two sources, we can construct price and quantity series for the years 1955-1998.
We linked these two data series at the time when data series based on the 1968 JSNA started which was
1970. 51 Thus we extended backwards the series in the 1968 JSNA using the growth rates of housing
expenditures tabled in the National Income Statistics for the years 1955-1970. 52 As explained in section
2.3 below, we constructed estimates for relative floor spaces of owner-occupied houses and rental
houses for the years 1955-2006. Thus, we could decompose our already constructed data series for the
total quantity of housing services into quantity components for imputed rent and market rent by using
the ratios of floor spaces. Thus we have obtained price and quantity series for the imputed rent of theowner-occupied houses. We then constructed price and quantity series for C for the years 1955-1998 by
applying chained Fisher indexes to the price and quantity series for Domestic Final Consumption
Expenditure of Households of the 1968 JSNA and our price and quantity series for the imputed
expenditures on owner-occupied housing, with the quantity of owner occupied housing entering theindex number formula with a negative sign. The resulting series will be linked to the more recent 1993
JSNA household consumption series to be described in the next paragraph.
For the years 1980-2002, current and constant yen series for (1) Final Consumption Expenditures ofHousehold (excluding imputed rents for the services of owner-occupied dwellings), (2) Direct Purchases
Abroad by Resident Households, and (3) Direct Purchases in the Domestic Market by Non-Resident
Households can be found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2004 (1993 JSNA), and thesedata series are further updated for the years 1980-2003 (constant yen series only for the years 19942003) using the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA) and for the years 1994-2006,
using the information posted on the Cabinet Office website: Annual Report on National Accounts of2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flow Accounts; 1.Integrated Accounts; (1) Gross Domestic ProductAccount (Production and Expenditure Approach); Calendar Year, in billions of yen. The constant yen
series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2004 is at the market prices of 1995. The constant
yen series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 is at the market prices of 2000. The
constant yen series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 is at the market prices of 2000
(chained). 53 From these data series, we constructed price and quantity series for each of the threevariables listed above for the years 1980-2006.

50

Shuji Hasegawa at the Japanese Cabinet Office has made available to us these data series.
Some variables in JSNA based on 1968 SNA are revised back to 1955. However, total housing expenses in
the 1968 JSNA are available only after 1970.
52
There is another database consisting of gross outputs, exports, and imports for the years 1951-1968. This
database was constructed at the joint project between Japan Center of Economic Research and Keio Economic
Observatory in the early 1970s, headed by Professor Iwao Ozaki, Keio University. We used the estimates ofhouseholds’ housing expenditure from this database in order to extrapolate the JSNA data based on the 1968
SNA backwards for the years 1955-1968.
53
Constant yen series based on chained indexes have been introduced in the Annual Report on National
Accounts of 2006. Since a chained index avoids the substitution bias that the usual fixed based index is likely
to show, we use constant yen series based on chained indexes as much as possible.
51

30

One difference between the 1968 JSNA and the 1993 JSNA is in the treatment of social benefits inkind. 54 It was a part of Domestic Final Consumption Expenditure of Households instead of a part ofGovernment Final Consumption Expenditure in the 1968 JSNA. However, it became a part ofGovernment Final Consumption Expenditure instead of a part of Domestic Final Consumption
Expenditure of Households in the 1993 JSNA. We consider social benefits in kind as a part of Domestic
Final Consumption Expenditure of Households following the treatment of the 1968 JSNA. 55 For theyears 1990-2003, current and constant yen series for Social Benefits in Kind etc. are found in the Annual
Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA), and these data series are further updated for theyears 1996-2006 in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flow
Accounts; 5. Supporting Tables, (8) Final Consumption Expenditure of General Government classified
by Purpose; Fiscal Year, in billions of yen. The constant yen series in the Annual Report on National
Accounts of 2005 are at the market prices of 1995. The constant yen series of the updated data series in
the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 is at the market prices of 2000. Since these annual data
series are based on a fiscal year, we transformed these data series of Social Benefits in Kind etc. basedon fiscal years into those based on calendar years by linear interpolation. 56 From these data series, weconstructed price and quantity series for Social Benefits in Kind etc. based on calendar years for theyears 1991-2006.
For the years 1991-2006, we constructed price and quantity series for our consumption aggregate C by
applying chained Fisher indexes to the above data series, which were essentially equal to an aggregateof: (1) Final Consumption Expenditures of Household (excluding imputed rent services of owneroccupied dwellings), (2) (less) Direct Purchases Abroad by Resident Households, plus (3) Direct
Purchases in the Domestic Market by Non-Resident Households and plus (4) Social Benefits in Kind.
We constructed two data series for C: one data series constructed from the data of the 1968 JSNA for theyears 1955-1998 and the other data series for C constructed from the data of the 1993 JSNA for the years
1991-2006. We linked these two data series at 1991, the time when the data series for social benefits inkind became available in the 1993 JSNA.
There is a final adjustment to our concept for the Domestic Final Consumption Expenditures ofHouseholds, C. Goods and services purchased for the maintenance of owner-occupied houses (in otherwords, maintenance expenses) are part of the imputed rent of owner-occupied houses. Since they are
produced by the market sector, we must add these maintenance expenses to our aggregate C. 57 We
aggregated these two variables by applying chained Fisher indexes. The operating surplus from theowner-occupied houses is the imputed rent minus the maintenance expenses for owner-occupied houses.
Thus, once we obtain the imputed rent and the operating surplus from the owner-occupied houses, we
can implicitly construct maintenance expenses. 58 For the years 1980-2003, current yen series for
54

Social benefits in kind consist of transfers made by government units to households. It consists of subsidies
for medical treatment and for text books which are supposed to be delivered to all the students without any
cost. However, these goods are also produced by the production sector.
55
Following the same treatment of social benefits in kind as in the 1968 JSNA, we can construct price andquantity series for C for a longer period than we can construct following the same treatment in the 1993 SNA.
56
The fiscal year in Japan is from April for the current year to May for the next year. Suppose that data seriesof fiscal year t are vt. Then, data series of calendar year t, Vt is calculated as follows: Vt = (1/4) × vt-1 + (3/4) ×
vt.
57
It is possible to make a separate data series of the goods and services for the maintenance. However, since
its value is relatively small (about 5 % of the imputed rent), we treat it as a part of household consumption.
58
We assume that the deflators for the maintenance expenses and the operating surplus of the owner-occupied
houses are the same as that of the imputed rent of the owner-occupied houses.

31

Operating surplus (imputed services of owner-occupied dwellings) can be found in the Annual Report on
National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA) and this data is updated for the years 1996-2006 using theAnnual Report on National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 FLOWS, 2. Income and Outlay
Accounts classified by Institutional Sectors, (5) Households (Including Private Unincorporated
Enterprises). For the years 1955-1979, we assume the ratio of the imputed rent to maintenance expenses
is constant and is the same as the average ratio over the five years 1980-1984. By utilizing this ratio andthe imputed rent of owner-occupied houses, we can extrapolate the maintenance expenses backwards.
1.4 Consumption Expenditures of Non-Profit Institutes (N)For the years 1955-1998, current and constant yen series for Final Consumption Expenditure of Private
Non-Profit Institutions Serving Households (N) is found in the Report on National Accounts from 1955
to 1998 (1968 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, [1] Figures of Calendar Year, Ι Time Series Tables, 1 Arranged
for Main Figures; Calendar Year, in billions of yen. The constant yen series is at the market prices of1990.
For the years 1980-2003, current and constant yen series for Final Consumption Expenditure of Private
Non-Profit Institutions Serving Households N is found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of2004 (1993 JSNA), and these data series are further updated for the years 1980-2003 (constant yen series
only for the years 1994-2003) in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA), theyears 1994-2006 on the Cabinet Office website, Annual Report on National Accounts for 2008 (1993
JSNA); see Part 1 Flow Accounts; 1.Integrated Accounts; (1) Gross Domestic Product Account(Production and Expenditure Approach); Calendar Year, in billions of yen.
Thus we have two data series for N. We link these two data series at 1980, the time when data series forthe 1993 JSNA starts.
1.5 Net Purchases of Goods and Services by the Government (G)We define net purchases of goods and services by the general government (G) as the purchases ofintermediate inputs by the general government (G1) minus the sales of goods and services of the general
government to the market sector (G2):• G (= G1 – G2): Net purchases of goods and services by the general government;• G1: Purchases of intermediate inputs by the general government;• G2: Sales of goods and services of the general government.
By definition, sales of goods and services of the general government (G1) is equal to government final
consumption expenditures (G3) minus the gross output of general government (G4).
• G2: (= G3 − G4) Sales of goods and services by the general government;• G3: Gross output of the general government;• G4: Government final consumption expenditures.
For the years 1955-1998, current and constant yen series for (1) Purchases of intermediate inputs by thegeneral government (G1), (2) Gross output of the general government (G3), and (3) Government final
consumption expenditures (G4) are found in the Report on National Accounts from 1955 to 1998 (1968
JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, [2] Figures of Calendar Year, I Time Series Tables 1, Arranged for Main
Figures. The constant yen series is at the market prices of 1990. From these data series, we constructed
price and quantity series for G1, G3, and G4. Thus, we can implicitly construct price and quantity series

32for G2 by using the data series of G3, and G4. In the end, we constructed data series of G for the years
1955-1998 by applying chained Fisher indexes to the price and quantity series of G1 and G2. 59
In the 1993 JSNA, current and constant yen series for G1 and G2 are available for the years 1990-2006.
For the years 1990-2003, current and constant yen series for Commodity and Non-Commodity Sales of
the General Government (G2) are found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1968
JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, 5. Supporting Tables, Table 8, Final Consumption Expenditure of General
Government classified by Purpose, Fiscal Year, in billions of yen. These data series are further updated
for the years 1996-2006 in the Annual Report of National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA). The constant
yen series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 is at the market prices of 1995. The
constant yen series of the updated data series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 is at
the market prices of 2000 (chained). We transform the data series for G2 based on fiscal years into those
based on calendar years by linear interpolation. 60 We construct price and quantity series for G1 from thedata of the 1993 JSNA for the years 1990-2006. For the years 1990-2003, current and constant yen
series for Purchases of intermediate inputs by the general government (G1) are found in the Annual
Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA), and these data are updated for the years 1996-2006
in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flow, 5. Supporting Tables,(2) Gross Domestic Product and Factor Income classified by Economic Activities; Calendar year, inbillions of yen. The constant yen series in Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 is at the market
prices of 1995. The constant yen series of the updated data series in Annual Report on National Accountsof 2008 is at the market prices of 2000 (chained). From these data series, we construct price and quantity
series for G1 for the years 1990-2006.
Thus we have two data series for G: one data series constructed using the data of the 1968 JSNA for theyears 1955-1998 and the other data series for G constructed from the data of the 1993 JSNA for theyears 1991-2006. We linked these two data series at 1991.
1.6 Exports and Imports of Goods and Services (X and M)
For the years 1955-1998, current and constant yen series on the 1968 JSNA basis are available for thefollowing four variables; (1) Exports of goods and services (S1), (2) Imports of goods and services (S2),(3) Direct purchases abroad by resident households (S3), and (4) Direct purchases in the domestic
market by non-resident households, (S4). These series are found in the Report on National Accounts
from 1955 to 1998 (1968 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, [1] Figures of Calendar Year, Ι Time Series Tables, 1
Arranged for Main Figures; Calendar Year, in billions of yen. The constant yen series are at the market
prices of 1990. For the years 1980-2003, current and constant yen series for the above variables such as
S1, S2, S5, and S6 can be found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA), andthese data are further updated for the years 1994-2006 in the Annual Report on National Accounts of
2008; see Part 1 Flow Accounts; 1.Integrated Accounts, (1) Gross Domestic Product Account(Production and Expenditure Approach), Calendar Year, in billions of yen. The constant yen series in the
Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 is at the market prices of 1995. The constant yen series of
the updated data series in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 is at the market prices of2000 (chained).
We have two data series for S1, S2, S3, and S4 individually. As usual, we linked these two data series at1980, the time when the data of the 1993 JSNA start.
59

When we aggregated these two data series, we put a negative sign in front of the quantity series G2.
G2 based on fiscal years is available for the years 1990-2006. However, since we transform data based on
fiscal yeas to data based on calendar years by using linear interpolation as we explained before, G2 based on
calendar years is available only for the years 1991-2006.
60

33

Finally, we constructed data series of X by applying chained Fisher indexes to the price and quantity
series of S1 and S4 and constructed data series for M by applying chained Fisher indexes to the price andquantity series for S2 and S3. 61
2. Capital Services and Investments
There are price and quantity series for investments and capital stocks for 95 asset classes; 90 tangible
assets and 5 intangible assets. These data are taken from the KEO data base. 62• I1 to I95: Investments for asset classes;• K1 to K95: Capital services for the asset classes.
We have already listed the 95 asset classes in Table 1. The numbering of investments corresponds to thatof capital services. Quantities of capital services are proportional to capital stocks at the beginning of theyear. Thus, we first describe how we constructed the capital stocks.
2.1 Capital Stocks
For constructing capital services, we make use of the following data from the KEO database:• Gross fixed capital formation by asset class for the whole country for the years 1955-2006;• Gross fixed capital formation by asset class for the market sector for the years 1955-2006; 63• Asset price indexes for the years 1955-2007;• Capital stocks by asset class at the end of 1955;• Depreciation rates.
Time series for Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) and for asset price indexes for each asset classare available in the latest version of the KEO database. By subtracting the investment in 1955 from thecorresponding capital stock in 1955, we can construct capital stocks at the beginning of 1955. If theinitial constructed capital stock of a good becomes negative, we set the resulting capital stock to be zero.
These constructed capital stocks at the beginning of 1955 are our initial benchmark estimate of thecapital stocks. Now, all the requirements to apply the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) are ready andwe can apply the method to estimate the capital stocks. Since asset price indexes are available for theyears 1955-2006, we obtain nominal and real capital stocks for 95 asset classes for the years 1955-2006.
By applying the user cost formula (53) in the main text, we can construct prices and quantities for thecapital services of these 95 asset classes.
2.2 Investments
All investment goods are produced by the market sector. However, the bit of GFCF that is used by thegovernment sector must be subtracted from the total economy estimates for GFCF by asset. Fortunately,
the required information is available for constructing market sector investment by asset class and isavailable on the KEO data base. Thus we could obtain price and quantity data on investments for 95
asset classes for the market sector over the years 1955-2006 based on the KEO database. 64 However, thestock of residential structures includes the stocks held by owner occupiers of houses. We need to extract
the residential capital held by owner occupiers from the total stock of residential structures in order toobtain the market sector’s residential capital that is used to produce market rental housing. We now turnto the problem of estimating the owner’s portion of the residential housing capital stock.
61

When we constructed these aggregates, we put negative sign in front of the quantity series for S3 and S4.
Nomura (2004) gives the detailed explanation of the construction of capital data of KEO data base.
63
Nominal and real GFCF for the market sector are available at KEO database.
64
These data are used for constructing capital services for the market sector.
6234

2.3 The Decomposition of Residential Structures Capital into Two Components
Overall residential structures can be classified into owner-occupied houses and rental houses. The
owner-occupied houses are attributed to household sector. The household sector earns imputed rent by
providing the services of its owned houses to itself. Therefore, the residential structures held by owneroccupiers should be subtracted from the total stock of residential housing. In order to accomplish thistask, we first calculate the total floor space of owner-occupied houses and rental houses. Second, we
divide the total stock of residential structures into owner-occupied houses and rental houses according totheir relative total floor spaces.
2.3.1 Data sources• Housing Survey of Japan Volume 1, Results for the Whole of Japan (1968) (1973) (1978)(1983) (1988) (1993), Statistics Bureau;• Revised Report on National Income Statistics (1951-1973), Economic Planning Agency;• Housing Survey of Japan, volume 1, results for whole Japan (1968)(1973)(1978)(1983)(1988),
Statistics Bureau;• Housing and Land Survey of Japan volume 1, results for whole Japan (1993)(1998)(2003),
Statistics Bureau;• Monthly of Construction Statistics (1955-2006), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
2.3.2 Total Floor Space Estimates for Owner-Occupied Houses and Rental Houses
Point estimates for total floor space for owned and rented houses are available every five years from1968 to 2003 in the Housing survey of Japan (1968) (1973) (1978) (1983) (1988) (1993) and the
Housing and land survey of Japan (1998) (2003). We use these data as benchmarks. We extend thesebenchmarks by utilizing the information on the net investment of the housing stock every year. Annual
data for residential investment and loss of residential buildings are available from Monthly ofConstruction Statistics (for the years 1960-2006). Annual investment (loss) is the floor space which has
been newly added to (subtracted from) the existing stock of housing.
The following two data series from Monthly of Construction Statistics are used:• New dwellings started: new construction starts of dwellings by owner occupant relation (floorarea) for the years 1955-2006.
• Loss of residential buildings: changes in total area and in dwelling units, by cause of loss for theyears 1955-2006.
New dwellings started provide estimates for the area of new construction of the following four different
kinds of houses:• (1) Owned houses; Dwellings which are owned by the households occupying them.
• (2) Rented houses; Rented houses which are owned and administrated by the local governmentor public corporations.
• (3) Issued houses; Dwellings which are owned or administered by private companies, publicbodies, etc and rented to their employees or officials in order to meet the needs of their work or
issued as a part of salaries and wages regardless of rent being paid.
• (4) Houses built for sales; Dwellings constructed by the public or private sectors in order to be
sold with the site under the house included in the sale.
We classify the types of overall houses as owned houses or rental houses. Since the data in the Monthlyof Construction Statistics have a more detailed classification than we are using, we regroup the four
different kinds of overall houses listed there into two categories; owned houses and rental houses. We

35

regard the floor area of new construction of owned houses (1) and houses built for sales (4) as additions(new investment) to the floor stock of the owned houses. We regard the floor area of new construction ofrental houses (2) and issued houses (3) as additions (new investment) to the floor stock of the rented
houses. 65
Statistics on the loss of residential buildings show the destroyed floor space of total residential building
by aging, natural disaster, and fires. These statistics include the loss of the owner-occupied houses andthe loss of rental houses. We distribute the area of the floor space losses between the owner-occupied
houses and the rental houses in proportion to the areas of their stocks and we obtain net investment
series (in terms of floor space) for the two types of house. We adjust these net investments every 5 years
between benchmarks by a linear interpolation method so that the accumulated floor spaces coincide withthe benchmark floor spaces. The earliest benchmark floor space is the one in 1968. For the years 19551967, we use the same adjustment coefficient as the one used between 1968 and 1973. We apply the
Perpetual Inventory Method to estimate floor space of housing for the years 1955-1967.
Now, we calculate floor spaces of overall residential structures, owner-occupied houses, and rental
houses. The last step is to make this database of floor space more consistent with the 1993 JSNA data.
Until 2003, housing expenses have been divided between owner-occupied houses and rental houses
according to their floor space in JSNA. The 1993 JSNA based data for imputed rents for owner-occupied
houses and for market rents gives us another estimate for the ratio of the floor space of owner-occupied
houses and the floor space of rental houses for the years 1981-2006. These 1993 JSNA based estimatesare quite similar to our estimates which have just been described. However, for the years 1981-2006, we
use the 1993 JSNA based estimates as the primary estimate and link our earlier series to the 1993 JSNA
data. This enables us to provide a breakdown of the total stock of residential structures into owneroccupied stocks and market sector rental stocks.
3. Inventory Services and Changes in Inventories
We regard the change in inventories as outputs and the stock of inventories as inputs to production of themarket sector. 66 There are price and quantity series for 4 types of changes in inventory and 4 types ofinventory services in our database.
• IV1: Changes in finished-goods inventories;• IV2: Changes in work-in-process inventories;• IV3: Changes in work-in-process inventories for cultivated assets;• IV4: Changes in materials inventories.
• KIV1: Finished-goods inventory services;• KIV2: Work-in-process inventory services;• KIV3: Work-in-process inventory services for cultivated assets;• KIV4: Material inventory services.
The quantities of inventory services are proportional to inventory stocks held at the beginning of the year.
Thus, first of all, it is necessary to construct prices and quantities for the inventory stocks. For
constructing inventory stocks, we make use of the following data from the KEO database. The following
nominal and real inventory stocks are available at the KEO database:65

This assumption will only be approximately correct since some of the houses built for sale can be sold tohome owners who lend their houses for tenants. As will be seen shortly, our assumptions here do not have tobe precisely correct. We just need them to be approximately correct so that we can construct reasonableestimates of floor space by type of house between censuses.
66
This follows the treatment advocated by Diewert (2005a).

36

•
•
•
•

(1) Finished-goods inventories at the end of the years 1955-2004;(2) Work-in-process inventories at the end of the years 1955-2004;(3) Work-in-process inventories for cultivated assets at the end of the years 1955-2004;(4) Material inventories at the end of the years 1955-2004.

Since they are stock at the end of the years 1955-2004, we use them as stocks at the beginning of theyears 1956-2005. We extend these data series backward to 1955 and forward to 2007. For the years
1997-2007, current yen series for inventory stocks (1), (2), and (4) are found in the Annual Report on
National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); Part 2 STOCKS, 5. Supporting Tables, (1) Closing Stocks ofAssets/Liabilities for the Nation. For the years 2006-2007, we extrapolate the data series in the KEO
data base by using the growth rate in the corresponding data series of the JSNA. Since there is no
information on the inventory stocks (3), we assumed that the growth rate of the nominal inventory stocks(3) is the same as that of the nominal inventory stocks (4). For the same periods 1955 and 2005-2006, we
extend prices of these four types of inventory stocks using the average growth rate over the recent 5
years.
The change in inventories over a year for each of our four types of inventory is regarded as an(investment) output of the market sector and it is equal to the difference between the stock of theinventory class under consideration at the beginning of current year and the stock of the same inventory
class at the beginning of the next year. Since we have already prepared estimates for our 4 types ofinventory stock, it is straightforward estimates of inventory change for the years 1956-2006. For 1955,
we extrapolate the change in inventory backward by using the average growth rate over the following 5
years. Adding change in inventory in 1955 to the inventory stock at the beginning of 1956, we obtain
inventory stock at the beginning of 1955.
In the end, we obtain estimates for the 4 types of changes in inventories IV1-IV4 for the years 19552006. We also obtain estimates for the four types of nominal and real inventory stocks (1)-(4). By
applying the user cost formula (53), we can construct prices and quantities of four types of inventory
services KIV1-KIV4 for the years 1955-2006.
4. Land Services
There are price and quantity series for four types of land in our database:• LD1: Agricultural land services; 67• LD2: Industrial land services;• LD3: Commercial land services;• LD4: Residential land services.
Quantities of land services are proportional to land stocks at the beginning of the year. Thus, first of all,
we have to construct land stocks.
4.1 Four Types of LandFor measuring land stocks, we make use of the following data from the KEO database, where estimatesfor nominal and real land stocks are available for the following types of land:• (1): Land for agricultural use;
• (2): Land for industrial use;
• (3): Land for commercial use;
67

Our estimates for agricultural land only include the land used for agricultural production. Other types ofland such as waste and fields are excluded from land for agricultural use.

37

•
•

(4): Land for residential use;(5): Land for general government.

KEO estimates are supplemented by data taken from the following websites.
• Website of Land Use Survey, http://www.mlit.go.jp/hakusyo/tochi/tochi_.html, Ministry ofLand, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism;• Website of Prefectural Land Price Survey, http://tochi.mlit.go.jp/english/index.html, Ministryof Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Since the KEO estimates are for stocks at the end of the years 1955-2004, we use them as estimates forthe land stocks at the beginning of the years 1956-2005. We extend these data series backward to 1955
and forward to 2006. For the stocks of 1955, we assume that they are equal to the corresponding stocksof 1956. For stocks of 2006, we estimate the real land stocks (1)-(4) by using the growth rates for thearea space information found in the website of the Land Use Survey and we also extrapolate nominal
land stock (1)-(4) by using the growth rate of nominal land stocks calculated from the real land stocks
and land prices that are found in the website of the Prefectural Land Price Survey. For information onland for the general government sector, current yen estimates for land for general government for theyears 1996-2006 can be found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); seePart 2 Stocks, 2 Accounts classified by Institutional Sectors, (3) General Government; Calendar Year inbillion yen. We obtain an estimate for the nominal land stock (5) in 2006 by using the growth rate of
nominal land for general government using the JSNA just described. The price of land for residential use(4) in 2006 is obtained by using the rate of growth in the land price for general government (5) over
2005-2006.
We attribute land for general government as land that is being used for commercial uses. It is not quite
true but it is a reasonable approximation. Thus, by subtracting land for general government from land forcommercial use, we obtain final estimates for commercial land. Since the stocks of land in the KEO
database are stocks at the end of the period, we convert these stocks to beginning of period stocks. We
assume that between 1955 and 1956, the area of each type of land is constant and the price of each landchanges at the average growth rate over the years 1956-1960. There remains one problem that land forresidential use also includes land being used for owner-occupied houses. Since the imputed rent ofowner-occupied houses is an output by household sector, it is excluded from the output produced by themarket sector. Therefore, the services of the land and residential building stocks for owner-occupied
houses should also be excluded from the input of market sector. We will explain how to subtract land forowner-occupied houses from land for residential use in the following section.
4.2 Residential Land
Residential land is the land that lies under residential structures. We divide the residential land into theowned residential land and the rental residential land in proportion to the land areas utilized by the two
types of residential structures. We calculate the area of the site under owner occupied and rental
houses. 68 The nominal and real residential land is divided into owned residential land and rental
residential land according to their areas of use. The owned residential land will be excluded from land
for residential use of the market sector.
4.2.1 Data Sources• Housing Survey of Japan, Volume 1, Results for the Whole of Japan (1968) (1973) (1978)(1983) (1988) (1993), Statistics Bureau;
68

Unfortunately, the land under owner-occupied houses is not always owned land.

38

•
•

Housing and Land Survey of Japan, Volume 1, Results for the Whole of Japan (1998) (2003),
Statistics Bureau;
Monthly of Construction Statistics (1955 to 2004), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure andTransport;

4.2.2 The Land under the Owned Houses and the Site under the Rental Houses
For the years 1968-2006, we use benchmark land areas under owned houses and rental houses, which areavailable every five years; see Housing and Land Survey of Japan and Housing Survey of Japan. We
interpolate these areas between benchmarks using annual “Areas of finished housing sites” reported
annually by the Monthly Statistics of Construction. The area of a finished housing site is the area of thesite which is currently transformed into residential land. There are four types of site:• (1) Housing sites for a public housing complex;• (2) Housing sites for individual houses;• (3) Housing sites for re-development; and• (4) Sites for villas.
We regard (2) plus (3) as the newly added area under owned houses. We regard (1) as the newly addedarea of under rental houses.
Initially, we assume the change in land areas under owned houses is proportional to the newly added
areas for owned houses and the change in the areas under rental houses is proportional to the newly
added areas for rental houses. We then proportionally adjust these initial estimates for land areas by typeof housing so that the accumulated area of residential land coincides with their benchmark values in the
5 year surveys.
The earliest benchmark survey for land areas is the one in 1968. However, there is no benchmark andannual data to impute the areas under owned houses and rental houses for prior years. We extend
backward the area of land for owner-occupied houses and rental houses by using their average growth
rates over the 10 years 1968-1978.
In the end, we obtain estimates for four types of nominal and real land stocks (1)-(4). By applying theuser cost formula in (53), we can construct prices and quantities of four types of land services LB1-LB4
for the years 1955-2006.
5. Labour Inputs
There are price and quantity series for 3 types of labour input in our database;• LB1: Labour input of employees in the market sector 69 ;• LB2: Labour input of the self-employed;• LB3: Labour input of family workers;
First, we calculate the number of workers who are actually working and the average yearly hours ofworks. Second, we multiply the number of workers by the average yearly hours worked. Thus we canget the yearly hours of work for the four types of workers.
5.1 Data Sources
The Japanese Labour Force Survey plays the key role in the construction of our labour input database.
There are six types of workers in Labour Force Survey. We construct the number of workers and the69

Employees include paid family workers.

39

average weekly hours of works for these six types of workers using the data in the Labour Force Survey;
see the following publications:• Annual Report on the Labour Force Survey (1970, 1972-2006), Statistics Bureau;• Website for the Labour Force Survey http://www.stat.go.jp/data/roudou/index.htm, Statistics
BureauThere were two major revisions of the Labour Force Survey in 1961 and 1967:• Revision of 1961; population coverage is changed from 14 years old to 15 years old and• Revision of 1967; the definition of “employed persons not at work” is changed. The coverage of
population is smaller after the revision than before the revision.
We ignore the revision of 1961. Education is compulsory for children between the ages of 6 and 15 in
Japan. Thus, we expect that the revision of 1961 did not affect the result of the survey. However, there isclear evidence that the revision of 1967 has had a large impact on the survey results. 70 The Annual
Report on the Labour Force Survey issued in 1970 contains old data series for the years 1955-1967 andnew data series for the years 1967-1970. Since the old data series follows the definition before therevision of 1967, we need to adjust the old data series so that it is consistent with the new data series. We
extend the new data series by using the growth rate of old data series for the years 1955-1966.
5.2 Three Types of Workers in Labour Force Survey
In the Labour Force Survey, all the workers are classified into three types of worker according to their“characteristics of employment” and then they are further divided into two types of “labour force status”.
Therefore, there are data on six types of worker and the total number of workers by type and theiraverage hours of work can be found in the Labour Force Survey.
Labour Force Status
According to the definitions in the Labour Force Survey, employed persons are the workers in the labour
force who are not unemployed. Employed persons are classified into the following two types according
to their labour force status:• Employed persons at work: all persons who worked for pay or profit or worked as unpaid
family workers for at least one hour during the survey week
• Employed persons not at work: employees who were absent from work but received or expected
to receive wages or salaries or self-employed workers whose absence from work has notexceeded 30 days.
Characteristics of Employment
All the employed persons are classified into following three types of worker according to the following
characteristics of employment:• Self-employed workers: persons who own and operate unincorporated enterprises;• Family workers: persons who work in unincorporated enterprises operated by family members;• Employees: persons who work for wages or salaries as employees of unincorporated enterprises,
companies, corporations and associations or levels of government.
Six Types of Workers in the Labour Force Survey
70

According to Annual Report on the Labour Force of Survey issued at 1970, the number of total employedpersons in 1967 is 4940 (before the revision) and 4920 (after the revision) in ten thousands of persons. The
average weekly hours worked of total employed persons is 46.4 hours (before the revision) and 48.8 hours
after the revision.

40

There are data on the following six types of worker in the Labour Force Survey:• L1: Employees at work;• L2: Employees not at work;• L3: Self-employed workers at work;• L4: Self-employed workers not at work;• L5: Family workers at work;• L6: Family workers not at work.
Average Yearly Hours Worked
Average weekly hours worked for three types of workers (self-employed workers, family workers andemployees) are available in the Labour Force Survey. Multiplying the weekly hours worked by fifty two,
we can calculate the yearly hours worked. They are the average yearly hours of works for employedpersons at work; those who are actually working during the week of survey investigation.
• AH1: Average yearly hours worked for employees at work;• AH2: Average yearly hours worked for self-employed workers at work;• AH3: Average yearly hours worked for family workers at work.
5.3 Three Types of Worker in the National Accounts
The numbers of the three types of worker are available in the National Accounts. There are labour datain the 1968 JSNA for the years 1955-1998. There are labour data in the 1993 JSNA for the years 19802006. We extend the data of the 1993 JSNA backwards by using the growth rates of the 1968 JSNA data.
The three types of worker in the JSNA are:•••

L7: Employees;
L8: Family workers and the self-employed workers;
L9: Government workers.

In comparison with the data series of the Labour Force Survey, the number of workers in JSNA includes
the number of employed persons not at work such as employees who were absent from work but
received or expected to receive wages or salaries or self-employed workers whose absence from work
has not exceeded thirty days. By using the ratio of the number of the employed persons at work and thenumber of the employed persons not at work in Labour Force Survey, we constructed the number ofthree types of the employed persons at work as follows:• L10 = L1−L9: Employees in market sector;• L11 = L3: The self-employed;• L12 = L5: Family workers.
Multiplying the number of employed persons by category by the corresponding average hours worked,
we can calculate total hours worked by category of worker:• TH1 = L10×AH1: Total hours worked by employees in the market sector;• TH2 = L11×AH2: Total hours worked by the self-employed;• TH3 = L12×AH3: Total hours worked by family workers.
5.4 Compensation of Employees
For the years 1955-1998, current yen series for the compensation of employees is found in the Report on
National Accounts from 1955 to 1998 (1968 JSNA); Part 1 Flows, [1] Figures of Calendar Year, II Time
Series Tables 2 Arranged for Main Figures, Distribution of National Income and National Disposable
Income, in Calendar Year (Billion Yen) at current prices. For the years 1980-2003, current yen series forcompensation of employees can be found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (199341

JSNA), and these data are further updated for the years 1996-2006 in the Annual Report on National
Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, 1. Integrated Accounts, (2) Distribution of National
Income and National Disposable Income, in Calendar Year (billion yen) at current prices. We link thedata of the 1993 JSNA to the data of the 1968 JSNA at 1980, the time when data based on the 1993
JSNA start. Thus we have constructed a data series for the compensation of employees for the whole
economy for the years 1955-2006.
For the years 1955-1998, compensation of employees for the general government is found in the Reporton National Accounts from 1955 to 1998 (1968 JSNA); see Part 3 Long Time Series of Production, II
Gross Domestic Product and Factor Income by Kind of Economic Activity (1) at current prices. For theyears 1990-2003, current yen series for compensation of employees for the government sector is foundin the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993 JSNA) and these data are further updated forthe years 1996-2006 in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows,
1. Supporting tables, (2) Gross Domestic Product and Factor Income classified by Economic Activities,
in Calendar Year (billion yen) at current prices. We link the data of 1993 JSNA to the earlier data of the1968 JSNA at 1990, the year when data of the JSNA 1993 start. Therefore, we have constructed the data
series of compensation of employees for the government sector for the years 1955-2006.
The difference between the total compensation of employees and compensation of employees for thegovernment sector is considered to be the compensation of employees of the market sector and period t,
we denote this market sector labour compensation by VLB1t. The period t hourly wage for employees in
the market sector WLB1t is obtained by dividing VLB1t by the period t yearly hours worked for employees
in the market sector TH1t as follows:(B1) WLB1t = VLB1t/TH1t
There remains the problem of determining appropriate wage for the self-employed and family workers.
We certainly expect the wage for a family worker to be very much less than the wage for an employee
and we would expect the wage for a self-employed person to be somewhat less than the wage for an
employee. However, it is difficult to know what exactly is the appropriate wage for self-employed andfamily workers.
We hypothesize that the wage for the self-employed WLB2t is a fraction f2 of the wage for employees inmarket sector WLB1t and the wage for family workers WLB3t is a fraction f3 of the wage for employees inmarket sector WLB1t.
(B2)

WLB2t = f2 WLB1t ; WLB3t = f3 WLB1t

for t = 1955,…,2006

For the ratio between the wage per employee and the average wage per the self-employed, we use theestimate in the KEO database of 32.8%. For the average ratio between the wage per employee and thewage per family worker, we use the estimate in the KEO database of 11.3%. We assume that the average
wage per worker coincides with the mean of “the average yearly hours worked times hourly wages” forthe years 1955-2006:
(B3)
(B4)

0.328 = (1/52)∑t=19552006[(AH２t×f2WLB1t)/(AH１t×WLB1t)]
0.113 = (1/52)∑t=19552006[(AH3t×f3WLB1t)/(AH１t×WLB1t)]

Thus, we can derive estimates for the two fractions f2 and f3 from equations (B3) and (B4). Solving theseequations, we obtain f2= 0.3252 and f3= 0.1014.

42

6. Taxes and Subsidies
There are 8 types of taxes in our database. We allocated all Japanese direct and indirect taxes andsubsidies into the following categories: 71• TA1 Consumption taxes: Taxes that fall on final demands such as H, I1-I95 (these taxes must be
deducted from the final demand consumption prices, since producers do not get the revenue
from these taxes);• TA2 Labour taxes: Taxes that fall on labour input plus contributions to social securities (we do
not deduct these taxes from the SNA estimates of labour income since firms must pay thesetaxes but we require estimates of labour taxes as an aid in determining capital taxes);• TA3 Capital taxes 72 : Taxes that fall on capital stock components such as the corporation tax(these taxes are added to the user cost of capital);• TA4 Property taxes 73 : Taxes that fall on specific capital stock components (these taxes areadded to the user cost of capital for the relevant specific capital stock);• TA5 Household capital taxes: Taxes on household non productive physical assets like durable
goods;• TA6 Poll taxes: Taxes that households pay, regardless of their incomes;• TA7 Tariffs: Taxes imposed on imported goods 74 ;• TA8 Subsidies on products: (these subsidies act as an offset to the indirect taxes that fall on
final consumption).
Household capital taxes and poll taxes do not change any prices which the production sector faces.
Therefore, we ignore them in our model of production. Other taxes such as TA1-TA4, TA7, and TA8
have been reflected in the prices of net outputs and primary inputs in our database.
There are several taxes which can be attributed more than one category. We will explain how to allocate
these taxes into different categories later in this section.
6.1 Data Sources for Taxes
We use tax revenue data of central and local government.
• National Tax Agency Annual Statistics Report (1955 to 2006), National Tax Agency;• Annual Statistical Report on Local Government Finance (1955 to 2006), Ministry of Internal
Affairs and Communications;• 1970 National Wealth Survey of Japan, Volume 1, Summary Report (1973), Economic Planning
Agency.

71

Some categories have subcategories. The subcategories are explained in footnotes.
Capital taxes are decomposed into the following categories: (1) General capital taxes; (2) Capital taxes ontangible capital; (3) Capital taxes on tangible capital excluding land; (4) Capital taxes on tangible capital
excluding land, structures, and inventories; (5) Capital taxes on tangible capital including land and excluding
inventories and (6) Financial capital.
73
Different rates of property tax are imposed on the following specific types of property capital stock: (1)Structures; (2) Structures and land in general; (3) Transportation equipment; (4) Forest wood; (5) Land ingeneral; (6) Land for agricultural use; (7) Non agricultural land and (8) Forest lands, waste lands and land
used for purposes other than agricultural use.
74
The total tax on an imported good can consists of consumption taxes, liquor taxes, tobacco taxes, gasoline
taxes, etc. Therefore, a different level of tariffs may be imposed on each imported good. We group tariffs into
the following four categories: (1) Tariffs for imported goods in general; (2) Tariffs for foodstuffs; (3) Tariffs
for mineral fuels and (4) Tariffs for miscellaneous goods.
72

43

6.2 Adjustments of Tax Data from Fiscal Years to Calendar YearsTax revenues in the various data sources are the amounts of tax revenue settled during a fiscal year.
However, many taxes are imposed on economic activity using different fiscal years. Therefore, tax
revenues in a fiscal year are not necessarily revenues from economic activity during the “regular” fiscal
year, which is April 1 to March 30. By linear interpolation, we adjust the tax revenues of each tax so thattax revenues are imposed on economic activities during calendar years. For example, the tax revenue
from the tobacco tax in a “tobacco fiscal year” is imposed on tobacco sales from March 1 in the current
year to February 28 in the next year. Thus, using the following linear interpolation, we can adjust tax
revenue from tobacco tax so that the adjusted tax revenue is from tobacco sales during a calendar year
(from January to December in the current year).
(B5) T2006 = (1/6)×t2005+(5/6)×t2006
where t is tax revenue from March in the current year to February in the next year and T is adjusted tax
revenue of the current calendar year.
Prefectural and municipal inhabitants’ taxes also require special attention. As we explain later, these
inhabitants’ taxes consist of two parts: one is a poll tax and the other one is proportional to income in theprevious year. The poll tax is attributed to the current year. However, the income part of the inhabitants’tax is attributed to the previous year.
6.3.1 Income Tax
A careful treatment is needed for modelling the income tax. Since households’ incomes can beconsidered as returns to labour or capital or more specific property, we divide total income tax revenue
between labour taxes, capital taxes, and property taxes.
For the national income tax, the tax collection agency adopts two tax collection methods: (a)withholding at source, and (b) self-assessment on a tax return basis. Income tax is paid by selfassessment unless it is withheld at the income source. Income taxes on wages, salaries, interest,
dividends, etc. are withheld by the payers of such income who remit the withheld tax to the governmenton the behalf of taxpayers. Under the self-assessment tax system, each taxpayer is required to file areturn and pay the appropriate amount of tax at the same time. The withholding tax system is firmly built
into the basic structure of the individual income tax. The amount withheld is treated as an advancepayment of the income tax payable by the recipient of the income.
Withholding Income Tax
The amounts of withholding taxes on the different sources of income are listed in National Tax Agency
Annual Statistics Report. Based on the characteristics of the sources of income, all withholding income
taxes are classified into the following categories of taxes:• (1) Interest income, etc. (treated as a general capital tax);• (2) Dividends (capital tax);• (3) Capital gains of listed stocks, etc. (capital tax);• (4) Wage and salaries (labour tax);• (5) Retirement income (labour tax);• (6) Remuneration, fees, etc. (labour tax);• (7) Income of non residents, etc. (ignored).

44

Thus we attribute (1) Interest income, (2) Dividends, and (3) Capital gains of listed stocks, etc. tofinancial assets and (4) Wage and salaries, (5) Retirement income and (6) Remuneration, fee, etc. tolabour. We ignore (7) Income of non residents, etc.
Self-Assessed Income Tax
With respect to the taxpayers of self-assessed income tax, the statistics of the amounts of incomes islisted by type of income in National Tax Agency Annual Statistics Report. First, self-assessed income tax
is split between the different types of income on the basis of the relative sizes of the types of income.
Then, we attribute taxes on different types of income into the categories of taxes based on thecharacteristics of the source of income: 75• Operating income:Business income (labour tax and capital tax)
Farm income (labour tax and capital tax)
• Rental income (capital tax);• Comprehensive capital gains (capital tax);• Sporadic income (labour tax);• Miscellaneous income (labour tax);• Difference by aggregation of profit and loss (capital tax);• Sales of wood in forest (property tax);• Long term separate capital gains (capital tax);• Short term separate capital gains (capital tax) 76 ;• Capital gains of stocks, etc. (capital tax)
Operating income refers to the incomes of farmers and the self-employed. Therefore, operating income
is considered as a return to labour and capital. We attribute tax on operating income in proportion tolabour input and capital service. 77 The majority of all employees pay income tax for their salaries
through the withholding tax system. 78
Prefectural and Municipal Inhabitants' Tax
Prefectures and municipals impose an income tax called the individual inhabitants’ tax. Individual
inhabitants’ tax consists of two parts: (a) individual inhabitants’ tax as a lump sum payment thathouseholds pay regardless of their incomes and (b) individual inhabitants’ tax with an income rate thathouseholds pay based on their income. There is no doubt that we can attribute tax (a) as a poll tax.
However, since we do not know the source of income for tax (b), we encounter the same problem as we
do in allocating self-assessed income tax into different categories. We split tax (b) on the basis of therelative sizes of the types of income. Then, we attribute taxes on different types of income into thecategories of taxes based on the characteristics of the source of income. Since we know the types ofincomes of those who pay withholding income tax and those who pay self-assessed income tax, we cancalculate the type of income for total households. Corporate inhabitants’ tax is imposed on corporations.
75

The tax category to which each income tax is attributed is in a parenthesis.
Long and short term separate capital gains are imposed when capital stocks are transferred from one agent
to the other.
77
Output and labour input at current prices can be calculated independent from tax on operating income. The
differences between output at current prices and labour input at current prices can be considered as capital
service at current prices.
78
The employees who earn more than certain amount (for example, more than 20 million yen in 2003) haveto pay more income tax in addition to income tax paid under the withholding tax system. However, thenumber of those earners is very small.
76

45

Since it is imposed on the financial capital and the profits of corporations, we regard these taxes ascapital taxes.
6.3.2 Inheritance Tax
An inheritance tax is tax imposed on the acquisition of the types of property listed below. We split theinheritance tax between these properties on the basis of the relative sizes of the values of properties.
Then, we attribute the inheritance taxes to the categories of taxes based on the characteristics ofproperties. The types of property are listed below and our attribution of the associated tax is noted inparentheses:• Housing land including leasehold (property tax);• Rice fields, farm fields, forest lands and other lands (property tax);• Total land (property tax);• Houses, structures (property tax);• Business (agriculture) property (property tax);• Securities (capital tax);• Cash, deposit (capital tax);• Household properties (household capital tax);• Other properties (capital tax);• Obligations and funeral expenses (poll tax).
6.3.3 Taxes on the Holdings of Transportation Equipment
Motor vehicle weight taxes, motor vehicle taxes and light motor vehicle taxes are imposed on theholdings of motor vehicles. Since households and the production sector own motor vehicles, these taxes
are paid by both households and producers. The part of these taxes paid by households is attributed tohousehold capital tax (and is not relevant for the purposes of this study). The other part of these taxes is
attributed to the production sector and should be regarded as a specific tax on the services of the taxed
vehicles, just as property taxes on structures used by the production sector are part of the user costs ofbusiness structures. We need to construct the total stock of automobile vehicles and divide this stock
between households and the production sector. Following the convention of JSNA, we divide the stockin half. We observe the automobile vehicle stock of households from the National Wealth Survey in1970. The survey tells us the relative sizes of the value of motor vehicles owned by households andproducers. Cutting the stock in half is consistent with this data source. 79
6.3.4. Fuel Tax
There are taxes on the use of fuels such as electricity, gas, gasoline, and light oil.
National Fuel Taxes:• Gasoline taxes;• Local road taxes (fuel taxes on gasoline);• Promotion of power resources development tax (fuel taxes on electricity).
Local Fuel Taxes:• Light oil delivery taxes (fuel taxes on light oil);• Electricity and gas taxes;• Electricity taxes;
79

The National Wealth Survey in 1970 is a comprehensive survey of assets for all sectors in the Japanese
economy. The total transportation equipment wealth for all sectors less the household sector was 2678.4
billion yen. The household sector owned transportation equipment valued by 2471.9 billions yen.

46

• Gas taxes.
These taxes are charged when these fuels such as electricity, gas, gasoline, and light oil are purchased.
These fuels are consumed both by households and the market sector. Therefore, it is not clear about how
to categorize fuel taxes. We attributed the payment of these taxes by households as a consumer tax. We
attributed the payment of these taxes by the market sector as a property tax which is necessary for using
a specific capital stock.
Total values for the above energy sources purchased within the whole country and the values of thesepurchases by the household sector are available in the Input Output Tables for Japan and this enables us
to apportion the above taxes into household and market sector components. Since Input Output tables areconstructed only every five years, there are no data available between years. We interpolate the data
between the 5 year censuses using the assumption of constant growth rates.
6.4 Subsidies
For the years 1955-1998, the amount of subsidies is found in the Report on National Accounts from 1955
to 1998 (1968 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, 2. Income and Outlay Accounts classified by Institutional
Sectors, (1) Total Economy, 1. Generation of Income Account, Calendar Year (Billion Yen). We
transformed this data series into that based on calendar years by linear interpolation. For the years 19802003, the amount of subsidies can be found in the Annual Report on National Accounts of 2005 (1993
JSNA) and this data series is updated for the years 1996-2006 in the Annual Report on National
Accounts of 2008 (1993 JSNA); see Part 1 Flows, 1. Consolidated Accounts for the Nation, (1) Gross
Domestic Product Account (Production and Expenditure Approach), Fiscal Year (Billion Yen). Hence,
we linked the data of the 1993 JSNA to the data of the 1968 JSNA at 1980, the time when the 1993
JSNA data starts. We treat the amount of subsidies as a deduction from consumption taxes.

47Appendix B.

Tables of Prices, Quantities, and Value for Inputs and Outputs

Table B- 1: Market Sector Output and Input Prices for Japan 1955-2006
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

PCt

PNt

PGt

PXt

PMt

PIt

PIVt

W Kt

W KIVt

W LDt

W LBt

1.00000
0.99703
1.02738
1.02625
1.05894
1.09084
1.15469
1.236121.32449
1.35950
1.45886
1.51695
1.56786
1.64996
1.71027
1.827941.94992
2.059212.29351
2.832643.160423.46526
3.71534
3.87391
3.997834.32413
4.52158
4.62834
4.71786
4.82858
4.918424.945454.94737
4.961365.04884
5.171535.283035.35828
5.40276
5.41735
5.396625.39591
5.455235.408505.37479
5.33873
5.28118
5.19282
5.14486
5.07268
5.00953
4.928421.00000
1.04615
1.10446
1.10634
1.14682
1.20386
1.28583
1.376101.46796
1.56704
1.664441.760621.864451.97776
2.109432.400922.70055
3.056213.59806
4.587415.10880
5.70934
6.17437
6.403516.80715
7.33700
7.52015
7.69027
7.79175
7.97162
8.146108.22560
8.264218.335658.52905
8.962919.23972
9.34334
9.334679.39690
9.405679.43497
9.57777
9.553279.44358
9.378949.33973
9.070428.943238.859378.913128.98647

1.00000
1.03388
1.07826
1.02659
1.02660
1.02179
1.02797
1.00577
0.964130.93538
0.90383
0.907170.93176
0.918190.900760.890240.841400.795480.851861.450221.02494
1.06147
1.05674
0.977401.03956
1.25680
1.33660
1.29913
1.296641.284071.39614
1.23620
1.15510
1.09534
1.12116
1.16374
1.152411.14051
1.12573
1.09140
1.06876
1.055421.07503
1.062111.043111.03769
1.02959
1.01556
0.99858
0.99077
0.99601
1.00967

1.00000
1.02965
1.03426
0.96878
0.98937
1.017381.01018
0.981420.999171.00856
0.997200.99403
0.995450.99573
1.008101.03805
1.06033
1.05206
1.152711.51236
1.58677
1.61790
1.55768
1.45874
1.577671.73055
1.78649
1.85101
1.79280
1.82130
1.76755
1.55180
1.48687
1.46098
1.509191.53466
1.49857
1.46065
1.36261
1.32033
1.29255
1.33823
1.36274
1.37515
1.25304
1.20100
1.22783
1.21287
1.17108
1.15700
1.17380
1.218631.00000
1.05376
1.09109
0.94146
0.933430.93658
0.94761
0.93746
0.95406
0.96725
0.95975
0.965610.950970.95036
0.97895
0.99677
0.96150
0.91509
1.09624
1.75661
1.927222.03849
1.966811.68134
2.15086
2.937712.95808
3.03352
2.86988
2.79678
2.64136
1.84760
1.69649
1.647591.756421.87546
1.796121.703171.56573
1.49759
1.46656
1.560541.65065
1.60171
1.470211.49125
1.52040
1.50088
1.484311.525141.65354
1.78359

1.00000
1.07799
1.14107
1.10683
1.10406
1.12828
1.21002
1.23850
1.244101.26346
1.28731
1.33289
1.38861
1.43391
1.49307
1.56173
1.59771
1.66686
1.933812.35584
2.451122.556212.66758
2.75138
2.94163
3.17559
3.23328
3.24736
3.239123.24600
3.22555
3.16648
3.14775
3.174483.26989
3.36079
3.408813.419443.41916
3.39038
3.366173.32070
3.318423.24115
3.16839
3.15573
3.06595
2.99292
2.955342.940312.92203
2.92197

1.00000
1.047121.05224
1.03845
1.06320
1.061451.05061
1.06323
1.07810
1.09280
1.12958
1.14260
1.14488
1.175621.22446
1.25690
1.28639
1.41150
1.66319
1.90937
2.00804
2.11166
2.153112.180312.390122.487102.53195
2.57551
2.579672.55926
2.46696
2.32755
2.26676
2.279212.29860
2.323192.33815
2.741142.97697
2.92008
2.894292.886632.87727
2.83786
3.17806
3.07127
2.992372.95949
2.972452.944412.95698
2.968641.00000
1.08169
1.15659
1.08086
1.15192
1.27237
1.43545
1.41725
1.448191.50856
1.48553
1.56866
1.64873
1.73058
1.778131.81056
1.69350
1.68574
1.88330
2.163132.118392.28546
2.356092.49634
2.72136
2.817142.78784
2.755342.700032.80297
2.851172.791442.74862
2.791442.868192.87526
2.83200
2.794822.694612.65835
2.650102.66805
2.65228
2.49595
2.44727
2.47140
2.365712.362212.36290
2.46092
2.486592.51649

1.00000
1.05204
1.191641.08918
1.282221.54259
1.87937
1.73852
1.83008
1.93255
1.808482.009512.22900
2.425452.47623
2.39880
1.95785
1.92085
2.23789
2.26767
1.929122.27598
2.19766
2.42779
2.841312.72588
2.49284
2.35093
2.16338
2.37885
2.441142.26552
2.14757
2.22673
2.292172.18253
1.97694
1.88367
1.60441
1.54632
1.534141.63862
1.59586
1.27424
1.266671.36088
1.164931.262441.36052
1.61013
1.67861
1.73151

1.00000
1.161961.36070
1.40745
1.83905
2.53976
3.19594
3.30404
3.73650
4.28573
4.27477
4.875885.72138
6.829197.76855
8.445447.863098.73231
10.19129.13653
7.784908.858568.79634
10.0163
11.6653
11.6000
11.4760
11.4128
11.0573
12.5124
13.6090
13.9688
14.6776
16.1472
18.1520
18.8101
17.5637
16.0579
13.6690
12.8586
12.4829
12.6933
11.9657
9.59550
9.108369.203228.087218.18701
8.095548.71952
8.79902
8.94577

1.00000
1.05179
1.10638
1.172091.277211.38571
1.57035
1.76259
2.00535
2.270102.548312.83193
3.17469
3.65518
4.257214.994505.80183
6.655938.06301
10.3362
12.2298
13.1718
14.3949
15.4132
16.352917.3548
18.4482
19.270319.5932
20.458121.1035
21.677722.099922.7855
23.945425.6530
27.328328.2152
28.867729.3625
29.5263
29.7140
30.5118
30.1564
29.6677
29.2208
29.3849
28.829328.4695
28.051128.3146
28.4287

48

Table B- 2: Market Sector Output and Input Quantities for Japan 1955-2006 (Billion Yen)
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006

yCt

yNt

yGt

yXt

yMt

yIt

yIVt

xKt

xKIVt

xLDt

xLBt

5021.95530.36012.16386.96887.87717.18572.79191.610044.5
11177.3
11716.012984.014445.6
15681.1
17369.9
18768.9
19777.2
21619.923557.223359.7
24406.425034.8
25928.1
27211.629010.029175.7
29574.431045.232055.8
32799.6
33817.034804.3
36189.6
37910.839642.6
41428.742338.843275.043637.1
44856.845742.746895.846975.746367.646760.047416.248359.548857.9
49114.550179.551190.1
52727.9

99.7
108.3
115.2
117.2
130.5
147.4
164.8
174.0
187.8
229.2
254.0
260.4
258.1
263.0
272.4
219.5
200.8
195.7
182.3
175.0
164.7
164.1
195.1
199.6
222.9
247.4
255.8
257.5
277.1
295.0
309.2
331.6
342.7
358.7
377.6
393.6
417.6
455.3
475.9
490.1
516.3
524.7
516.5
574.2
620.3
575.0
584.1
617.1
657.1
690.6
723.2
742.5

246.2
221.3
226.2
261.7
281.1
313.7
347.9
409.6
486.2
504.2
539.3
607.9
613.6
744.0
897.6
1107.81357.61630.1
1875.01363.12084.92107.72384.02760.12985.72961.13221.63490.63832.24079.03823.34761.24864.95392.25872.16377.37506.28017.28417.29057.39800.610109.7
10034.4
10676.1
11401.711257.3
11463.2
11668.2
11982.7
12023.3
11688.8
10671.3

887.1
1062.31201.51276.61465.41647.31730.92062.22225.52733.83415.84004.34273.15297.66425.77530.78841.49225.39733.512014.8
11903.8
13889.8
15520.915504.0
16156.4
18909.4
21127.021105.821747.524565.926018.5
24414.824189.025437.127800.029635.7
30911.432142.532169.2
33343.934833.036801.7
40874.6
39773.4
40588.1
45789.542592.645801.949728.856596.3
60478.9
66512.1

931.2
1182.01453.01256.41543.01892.72394.6
2366.22830.43217.23396.73805.34671.95244.25950.87299.47766.28530.110560.711045.2
9894.310533.7
10906.3
11461.012917.3
11991.4
12220.9
12401.6
12004.1
13270.713399.1
13447.7
15084.7
17470.020373.4
21940.321754.521465.2
21223.4
22881.525941.829815.430304.4
28421.329241.032202.5
32777.733060.5
34448.3
37014.3
39484.7
41765.2

1618.5
1988.92412.82535.93008.94052.45030.05640.86310.87337.87589.28685.010288.5
12292.3
14428.7
16754.7
17458.3
19078.7
21349.7
20170.2
19936.520780.521330.623135.924388.7
24266.1
24825.2
24953.024683.6
25793.828001.829879.832170.836216.4
39761.643024.044379.543490.642076.741384.3
41473.743423.743709.940835.540556.040715.9
40621.538912.1
38698.739369.2
40884.941477.0

467.3
501.7
492.7
157.5
529.2
653.6
1122.7
501.1
767.8
874.4
652.6
855.7
1521.2
1597.91738.51696.7339.7
251.8
1720.41765.4-486.3565.5-238.0-400.62330.41632.9499.1
331.2-482.8664.3
471.7-494.4354.2
432.5
1511.81007.8543.8
30.7-578.0-485.1
682.7
941.3
898.4
-24.1
-1246.7
121.2-933.6-501.0-702.5-101.31130.4
2469.52072.12083.42154.52284.72419.42586.22875.33269.33681.74111.24617.95073.85615.46330.67222.1
8291.39547.510682.911845.2
13110.9
14077.014895.015699.1
16540.1
17578.8
18665.5
19752.520827.021846.1
22845.5
24619.8
26296.4
28219.030011.632083.4
34519.3
37069.3
39505.4
41307.4
42406.743239.044321.045714.847158.7
48091.348880.3
49965.750955.851507.4
52205.3
52968.3
54090.1

250.7
268.5
290.7
311.6
318.3
340.9
367.2
410.8
430.5
461.0
496.3
522.5
554.9
610.4
668.2
731.2
793.2
805.9
815.0
876.1
939.1
921.7
942.1
933.6
918.9
1003.31062.51080.91093.31075.31100.01117.4
1099.41112.11127.6
1181.21216.71236.21237.61210.61188.01220.01264.31306.91305.61238.41244.91193.81166.41128.01091.31173.81351.21353.91359.91367.31379.11386.81414.81443.71472.91504.1
1548.61652.51755.71798.81905.2
1961.32012.82072.92200.02292.02385.52446.52544.52612.72667.82727.92761.12809.32851.72862.02922.32932.82969.83014.73050.33094.43116.83169.53221.93272.03303.43349.1
3393.23448.93469.83509.93540.33557.23595.53590.23595.53640.53733.04051.14325.04468.94612.94870.25019.35232.85301.15445.85600.15824.75985.96063.16137.76273.56359.86422.86627.26496.46325.86616.06765.36839.06951.87084.77221.07318.57561.57628.67729.07832.07957.28155.58315.48414.68532.28509.58464.78474.58549.68577.88547.1
8489.38426.88581.68442.78347.08328.78382.78389.98491.449

References
Archibald, R.B. (1977), “On the Theory of Industrial Price Measurement: Output Price Indexes”, Annals of
Economic and Social Measurement 6, 57-72.
Balk, B.M. (1998), Industrial Price, Quantity and Productivity Indices, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Christensen, L.R. and D.W. Jorgenson (1969), “The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929-1967”,
Review of Income and Wealth 15, 293-320.
Christensen, L.R., D.W. Jorgenson and L.J. Lau (1971), “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental
Logarithmic Production Function”, Econometrica 39, 255-256.
Denison, Edward F. (1974); Accounting for United States Economic Growth 1929-69, Washington D.C.: The
Brookings Institution.
Diewert, W.E. (1973), “Functional Forms for Profit and Transformation Functions”, Journal of Economic
Theory 6, 284-316.
Diewert, W.E., (1974), “Applications of Duality Theory,” pp. 106-171 in M.D. Intriligator and D.A. Kendrick(ed.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. II, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Diewert, W.E. (1977), “Walras’ Theory of Capital Formation and the Existence of a Temporary Equilibrium”,
pp. 73-126 in Equilibrium and Disequilibrium in Economic Theory, E. Schwödiauer (ed.), Reidel
Publishing Company.
Diewert, W.E. (1978), “Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation”, Econometrica 46, 883900.
Diewert, W.E. (1980), “Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital”, pp. 433-528 in The
Measurement of Capital, D. Usher (ed.), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Diewert, W.E. (1983), “The Theory of the Output Price Index and the Measurement of Real Output Change”,
pp. 1049-1113 in Price Level Measurement, W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.), Ottawa:
Statistics Canada.
Diewert, W.E. (1993), “Symmetric Means and Choice Under Uncertainty”, pp. 355-433 in Essays in Index
Number Theory, Volume I, Contributions to Economic Analysis 217, W.E. Diewert and A.O.
Nakamura (eds.), Amsterdam: North Holland.
Diewert, W.E. (1997), “Commentary” on Mathew D. Shapiro and David W. Wilcox, “Alternative Strategies
for Aggregating Price in the CPI”, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 79:3, 127-137.
Diewert, W.E. (2004), “Measuring Capital”, Discussion Paper 04-10, Department of Economics, The
UniversityofBritishColumbia,
Vancouver,
Canada,V6T
1Z1.
Available
at http://www.econ.ubc.ca/discpapers/dp0410.pdf
Diewert, W.E. (2005a), “On Measuring Inventory Change in Current and Constant Dollars”, Discussion Paper
05-12, Department of Economics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, V6T
1Z1. Available at http://www.econ.ubc.ca/diewert/disc.htm
Diewert, W.E. (2005b), “Issues in the Measurement of Capital Services, Depreciation, Asset Price Changes
and Interest Rates”, pp. 479-542 in Measuring Capital in the New Economy, C. Corrado, J.
Haltiwanger and D. Sichel (eds.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Diewert, W.E. and K.J. Fox (2005), “The New Economy and an Old Problem: Net versus Gross Output”,
University of New South Wales, April.
Diewert, W.E. and D. Lawrence (2005), “Australia’s Productivity Growth and the Role of Information andCommunications Technology: 1960-2004”, Report prepared for the Department of Communications,
Information Technology and the Arts, Canberra, Australia, March. 14.
Diewert, W.E. and D. Lawrence (2006), Measuring the Contributions of Productivity and Terms of Trade toAustralia’s Economic Welfare, Report by Meyrick and Associates to the Productivity Commission,
Canberra, Australia. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/19/37503743.pdf
Diewert, W.E., H. Mizobuchi and K. Nomura (2005), “On Measuring Japan’s Productivity, 1955-2003”,
Discussion Paper 05-22, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver,B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z1, December. http://www.econ.ubc.ca/discpapers/dp0522.pdf
Diewert, W.E. and C.J. Morrison (1986), “Adjusting Output and Productivity Indexes for Changes in theTerms of Trade”, The Economic Journal 96, 659-679.

50

Diewert, W.E. and A.M. Smith (1994), “Productivity Measurement for a Distribution Firm”, the Journal of
Productivity Analysis 5, 335-347.
Edwards, E.O. and P.W. Bell (1961), The Theory and Measurement of Business Income, Berkeley: Universityof California Press.
Feenstra, R.C. (2004), Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton N.J.: Princeton
University Press.
Fisher, F.M. and K. Shell (1972), “The Pure Theory of the National Output Deflator”, pp. 49-113 in The
Economic Theory of Price Indexes, New York: Academic Press.
Fisher, I. (1922), The Making of Index Numbers, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
Fox, K.J. and U. Kohli (1998), “GDP Growth, Terms of Trade Effects and Total Factor Productivity”, Journalof International Trade and Economic Development 7, 87-110.
Gorman, W.M. (1968), “Measuring the Quantities of Fixed Factors”, pp. 141-172 in Value, Capital and
Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, J.N Wolfe (ed.), Chicago: Aldine Press.
Hamada, K. and K. Iwata (1984), “National Income, Terms of Trade and Economic Welfare.” Economic
Journal, 94, 752-771.
Hayashi, F. and E.C. Prescott (2002), “The 1990s in Japan: A Lost Decade”, Review of Economic Dynamics 5,
206-235
Hayashi, F. and K.Nomura (2005), “Can IT be Japan’s Savior?”, Journal of Japanese and International
Economies. 19, 543-567
Hicks, J.R. (1946), Value and Capital, Second Edition, Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Hicks, J.R. (1961), “The Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic
Aggregates”, pp. 18-31 in The Theory of Capital, F.A. Lutz and D.C. Hague (eds.), London:
Macmillan.
Hotelling, H. (1932), “Edgeworth’s Taxation Paradox and the Nature of Demand and Supply Functions”,
Journal of Political Economy 40, 577-616.
Jorgenson, D.W. (1989), “Capital as a Factor of Production”, pp. 1-35 in Technology and Capital Formation,
D.W. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.), Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Jorgenson, D.W. (1996a), “Empirical Studies of Depreciation”, Economic Inquiry 34, 24-42.
Jorgenson, D.W. (1996b), Investment: Volume 2; Tax Policy and the Cost of Capital, Cambridge,
Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Jorgenson, D.W. and Z. Griliches (1967), The Explanation of Productivity Change”, The Review of Economic
Studies 34, 249-283.
Jorgenson, D.W. and Z. Griliches (1972), “Issues in Growth Accounting: A Reply to Edward F. Denison”,
Survey of Current Business 52:4, Part II (May), 65-94.
Jorgenson, D.W., M. Kuroda, and M. Nishimizu (1987). “Japan–U.S. Industry-Level Productivity
Comparisons, 1960 –1979.”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1, 1–30.
Jorgenson D.W. and M. Nishimizu (1978), “U.S. and Japanese Economic Growth 1952-1974: An
International Comparison”, Economic Journal 88, 707-726
Jorgenson, D.W. and K.Nomura (2005), “The Industry Origins of Japanese Economic Growth”, Journal ofJapanese and International Economies. 19, 482-542
Kohli, U. (1978), “A Gross National Product Function and the Derived Demand for Imports and Supply of
Exports”, Canadian Journal of Economics 11, 167-182.
Kohli, U. (1990), “Growth Accounting in the Open Economy: Parametric and Nonparametric Estimates”,
Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 16, 125-136.
Kohli, U. (1991), Technology, Duality and Foreign Trade: The GNP Function Approach to Modeling Imports
and Exports, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kohli, U. (2003), “Growth Accounting in the Open Economy: International Comparisons”, International
Review of Economics and Finance 12, 417-435.
Kohli, U. (2004a), “An Implicit Törnqvist Index of Real GDP”, Journal of Productivity Analysis 21, 337-353.
Kohli, U. (2004b), “Real GDP, Real Domestic Income and Terms of Trade Changes”, Journal ofInternational Economics 62, 83-106.

51

Kuroda, M. Shimpo, K., Nomura, K., Kobayashi, N. (1997), KEO Data Base-The Measurement of Output,
Capital, and Labor (in Japanese). Monograph Series no. 8. Tokyo: Keio Economic Observatory.
Lau, L. (1976), “A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function”, Journal of Economic
Theory, 12:1, 131-163.
Marshall, A. (1890), Principles of Economics, London: Macmillan.
McFadden, D. (1978), “Cost, Revenue and Profit Functions”, pp. 3-109 in Production Economics: A DualApproach to Theory and Applications. Volume 1, M. Fuss and D. McFadden (eds.), Amsterdam:
North-Holland.
Miyagawa, T., Y. Ito, and N. Harada (2004), “The IT Revolution and Productivity Growth in Japan”, Journalof the Japanese and International Economy 18, 362-389.
Nomura, K. (2004), Measurement of Capital and Productivity in Japan, (in Japanese), Tokyo: Keio
University Press.
Oulton, N. (2004), “Productivity Versus Welfare: Or GDP Versus Weitzman's NDP”, Review of Income and
Wealth 50-3, 329-355.
Pigou, A.C. (1924), The Economics of Welfare, Second Edition, London: Macmillan.
Rymes, T.K. (1968), “Professor Read and the Measurement of Total Factor Productivity”, The Canadian
Journal of Economics 1, 359-367.
Rymes, T.K. (1983), “More on the Measurement of Total Factor Productivity”, The Review of Income and
Wealth 29 (September), 297-316.
Samuelson, P.A. (1953), “Prices of Factors and Goods in General Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies
21, 1-20.
Samuelson, P. A. (1961), “The Evaluation of ‘Social Income’: Capital Formation and Walth”, 32-57 in The
Theory of Capital, F.A. Lutz and D.C. Hague (eds.), London: Macmillan
Samuelson, P.A. and S. Swamy (1974), “Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality: Survey
and Synthesis”, American Economic Review 64, 566-593.
Sato, K. (1976), “The Meaning and Measurement of the Real Value Added Index”, Review of Economics andStatistics 58, 434-442.
Schreyer, P. (2001), Measuring Productivity: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry Level Productivity
Growth, Paris: OECD.
Schreyer, P. (2007), Measuring Capital, OECD Statistics Directorate, STD/CSTAT/WPNA (2007)2, Paris:OECD.
Schreyer, P. (2008), “Measuring Multi-factor Productivity when Rates of Return are Exogenous”, Price andProductivity Measurement, W. Erwin Diewert, Bert M. Balk, Dennis Fixler, Kevin J. Fox and AliceO. Nakamura (eds.), Trafford Press, forthcoming.
Törnqvist, L. (1936), “The Bank of Finland’s Consumption Price Index”, Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin
10: 1-8.
Törnqvist, L. and E. Törnqvist (1937), “Vilket är förhällandet mellan finska markens och svenska kronans
köpkraft?”, Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift 39, 1-39 reprinted as pp. 121-160 in Collected
Scientific Papers of Leo Törnqvist, Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, 1981.
United Nations (1993). System of National Accounts 1993. New York: United Nations.
Weitzman, M. (1976), “On the Welfare Significance of National Product in a Dynamic Economy”, Quarterly
Journal of Economics 90, 156-162
Weitzman, M. (2003), Income, Wealth and the Maximum Principle, Cambridge, MA: Harverd University
Press
Woodland, A.D. (1982), International Trade and Resource Allocation, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

52