The Development of Guilds (Associations) in Wenzhou:
A Trend of Relationship between Civil Society Organizations and State

Abstract: Merchant guilds (associations) in the city Wen Zhou, Zhe Jiang Province
have been well developed for the over past decade. As an intermediary force and thereframing of economic organizations, they not only represent the interests of thebusiness, but also have come to become the autonomous force independent from thegovernment. To a large extent, they pushed the government to reform itself. Thoughstill a unique phenomenon, the trend of the relationship between civil society
organizations and state carries optimistic implications on the growth of civil society in
China.
Key Word: Merchant Guilds

Government

Civil Society

Since the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project did the research on 22
countries in Europe, Asia and Latin American, its further application of social origins
theory to explain the relations between state and the third sector and the four modelsof third sector regime have been widely taken and employed by other scholars ( Lester
M. Salamon etc) . Headed by Lester M. Salamon, the project team collected the datafrom 22 countries and differentiated four regimes according to two key indexes. One
is government social welfare spending, and the other is the scale of the third sector.
Statist regime describes the status of low government social welfare spending andsmall nonprofit scale, with the corporatist regime at the other extreme, in which highgovernment social welfare spending coexists with a large scale nonprofit sector.
Social democratic regime depicts the situation of high government social welfare
spending and small third sector, and the liberal type, a classic case of which is theUnited States, shows a large scale nonprofit sector even without big financial resourcefrom government.
Though Salamon et al. recognized that the four regime types could only picture abasic contour of the situations in the third sector and it varies country by country interms of different political, economic and social histories, its research seems to have

focused on a static description rather than a dynamic procedure. Especially to thosecountries with big political, economic and social transformations, it is difficult tocover the ongoing shifts in just one or two regime. Secondly, different associations
constituting the third sector might enjoy different degrees of autonomy and freedom
due to political constraints or authority‟s preference choices and thus face different
situation in development. In China‟s context, the political and economic reform sincelate 1970s has opened up limited autonomy to the society with the upsurge ofassociations or civil organizations in different genres comparing to the control
penetrating to every corner of the society before reform. As the Chinese Communist
Party set up its economic reform goal preceding a political one, it is evident that thewithdrawal of domination from economic sphere is proceeding much faster than thatin political and societal sphere. With the regime changing from a totalitarian to an
authoritarian one, some scholars argue the arrangements between the third sector andstate has turned to a „corporatism‟ type (Unger and Chan, 1993). The classic definitionof corporatism was given by Philippe Schmitter. According to Schmitter, corporatism
is “a system of interest representation in which the constituent units are organized
into limited number of singular, compulsory, noncompetitive, hierarchically ordered
and functionally differentiated categories, recognized or licensed (if not created) by
the state and granted a deliberate representational monopoly within their respective
categories in exchange for observing certain controls on their selection of leader andarticulation of demands and supports”.(Schmitter 1974: 93-4) As the sub-types ofcorporatism, the regime of societal corporatism is often a phenomena found indemocratic countries while state corporatism is the peer in authoritarian regimes.
Analysis of the features of the association functions, their role in representative ofmembers, and their interaction mode with state shows that the state-corporatism
regime fits into China‟s context. At the same time, Jean Oi explored how theadministrative power of local officials positively influenced the rapid economic
development including the private economic sector. Local state corporatism is her
answer to the phenomena. (Oi 1999: 11). Oi compared it with the general uses of theterm „corporatism‟. She cast more emphasis on the role of local state rather than thecentral state. The corporatism is “constituted and coordinated by the local
government- specifically counties, townships, and villages- not central authorities”.
(Oi 1999:12) In the sense of “corporate”, local government resembles thecharacteristics of business corporations to certain extent, and local authority act likean executive member in a board of a company. Whereas, the local authority also
attempts to keep the emerging private sector from growing an independent class,which adds the meaning of „corporatist‟ to the term corporatism and regard China‟scase as a sub-type of state corporatism. In later part of this paper, this framework is tobe discussed on its accuracy to capture the features of the relationships between local
state and merchant guilds as well as its transition.
What Unger and Chan discovered in the 1990s was the corporatist representation of
trade unions or associations that mainly included the state-owned enterprises,
meanwhile positive signs were mentioned on the implications of local Chamber ofCommerce under the umbrella of All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce.
More than ten years passed and the phenomenon of merchant guilds established by
Wenzhou businessmen probably has provided new perspective in observing theregional corporatist regime. On the approach of the resurge of merchant guilds and its
influence from bottom-up on the reform within the local government, this form ofcivil organizations in Wen Zhou reflects the autonomy and vigor from the society.
Though it is limited so far in economic sector where government has been
relinquishing the power back to society most, this uniqueness has attracted a lot ofinterests.
The existence of merchant guilds in China has been a long history. Merchants in
Shan Xi and An Hui Province were once very powerful in influencing the economy
locally or even nationally. Guilds were set up to expand their networks withgovernment and business as well. The earliest merchant guild in Wen zhou dates backto the late Qing Dynasty, and it boomed again after the economic boost in Zhe Jiang
Province. As an exit port for trade with foreigners after the gate was forced to open to
the West. Merchant guilds were permitted to set up under the authorization of the Qin
Government. They stretched out their force and gained their influence from theirclients and public by steadying the foods price and coordinating with the government
on people‟s livelihood. Nonetheless, the coming turmoil from the collapse of Qin
Dynasty until late 1970s did not create a stable surrounding for the normal
maintenance of these organizations. The communist system actually stifled theeconomy. The merchant guilds had no environment to live on. Not until from 1980s
when the private economy sector started to revive when the reform stimulated theeconomy and the small commodities business came back to life, many manufactureindustries expanded their business. Wen Zhou has been known for its production ofsmall commodities. Manufactures of shoes, clothes, cigarette lighter, glasses etc. havebeen mainstay industries in Wen Zhou. The competition within the city and fromoutside prompted the businesspeople to find a way to regulate themselves andenhance the competitiveness. Yet, the determination to clear out the infamous
reputation of producing fake and low-quality products during the 1980s is also an
opportunity for local merchant guilds to display their force. Wen Zhou mould isfamous for its small commodity economy. Yet in 1980s, its fame was also
contaminated by fake and low-quality products. Small workshops producing similar
products often reduced market prices and formed a vicious competitive circle. The
unhealthy market order and crisis of trust did not just exist in Wen zhou, actually it
was a common feature in many provinces where market economy was underconstruction at beginning. What makes Wen zhou different from other places in theadjustment is the role played by merchant guilds and associations. Instead of solely
being regulated by government, the merchants in different industries set out to form
their own guilds (also called associations) to clean the market. The enterprises indifferent industries benefited from the associations or guilds a lot in upgrading andregulating their own business while the latter also tightened the ties with theirmembers and government in establishing a more developed and matured market. Fora long time, the scholars or observers have done research from economic perspective
and discovered how it have been contributing to local economy and its adaptability
and influence on other regions. However, not until in recent years, did scholars start to
explore it in a political science paradigm and observe its implication to the growth of

the third sector1 (Yu 2004& 2007, Chen& Ma, 2006). They did lots of surveys on theorganizations, personnel, systems, financial situation, and the networks withgovernment to assess the autonomy and the performance of the merchant guilds.
Although they discuss about the relations and interactions between merchant guilds
and government, they do not intend to discuss the relations in a theoretical framework.
This report attempts to employ the social origin theory to analyze the regime type
between the merchant guilds and government2.
When scholars try to fit China‟s case into certain regime type, they sometimes
ignore the unbalanced development in respective sphere. A simple prototype of
regime is insufficient to capture the relations between authority and the third sector.
The development of merchant guilds in Wen zhou has shown some features beyond
the strictly defined state-corporatism regime. The bottom-up approach the merchantguilds and industrial associations have taken reflects a new way to seize more
self-governing freedom from the state. Secondly, at a regional level, positive signs
indicate a transformation from a state-corporatism to a societal-corporatism in termsof relatively great organizational, decision-making and financial autonomy the guilds(associations) have. Thirdly, the government‟s role in Wen zhou is also a reason that
contributes to the changing regime.

I

Bottom-up Approach in the formation of merchant guilds (associations)
In a state-corporatism regime, the state recognizes only one organization as thelegitimate representative of the interests in respective sectors. In order to secure theorder, the state cautiously makes the arrangements from top-down and holds thedecision-making power tightly in hand. If the sole representative organization in1

Yu has been doing research on guilds in Wenzhou since 2002, and has conducted quite large-scale surveys in
2003, 2005 and 2007 on the internal organizations of the guilds and their performance assessment. His researchgroup tries to evaluate the autonomy and functional situation of guilds in Wenzhou.
2
Many scholars have showed interests on the special phenomenon of booming guilds in Wenzhou from theperspective of economy, like transaction cost angle. Not until from 2004, Chinese scholars began to explore thephenomenon in the respect of political science or civil society, such as civil guilds and local government-----basedon the research in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province (Yu, Wuang, Huang 2006), Between Government and Enterprises:
Research of Guilds in Wenzhou ( Yu, Huang, Fang 2004), Chinese Social Organization Research In Controversy:
The Angle of State-Society (Wang, 2006). Outside China, Margaret M. Pearson has asserted a social corporatism
regime in business associations in foreign enterprises in China. Jonathan Unger discussed the rise of guilds as
bridge connecting private business and Chinese government. So far, no one has explicitly analyzed the regime andits potential trend in terms of the merchant guilds sphere.

certain sector doesn‟t oversee its constituencies according to state‟s will, it might bepunished by removal of its leaders or in other form. Meanwhile, the peak organization
in a societal-corporatism regime has more choices in choosing its own members andbargain with them. In Wen zhou, the merchant guilds and industry associations haveenjoyed much freedom in joining the group of its agent, the Industrial andCommercial unions or Economic and Trade committee, the latter of which is in chargeof economic affair in the government. At the same time, the autonomy of setting up
merchant guilds and industry associations in all industries are uniquely high in Wenzhou that some scholars call it „real civil merchant guilds ‟(Wu, 2003) or „democracy
forced from bottom-up ‟(Zhao，1999). The autonomy comes mainly from the impetusof private enterprises that have contributed dominantly to the economy since 1980s.
By 2006, the private economy accounts for over 80% of the production output. It also
benefits from a weak linkage between economy and government. In this sense, it
opens up a gap and creates space for breeding the third force.
After the reform and open-up policy were carried out, the first constellation ofmerchant guilds were established in late 1988. The Wen zhou Sodality of Joint
Venture Enterprises was established on October 15th, followed by the Grocery
Association and Association of Knitting and Textile Industry on November 28 th thesame year. All these three associations were formed spontaneously. Later, merchantguilds and associations were established in other fields that covered most of pillar
industries in the city. Shoemaking, glasses-making lighter, leather and many otherindustries started to realize the significance and register under the General Chamberof Commerce in form of their own guilds. Two points need to be emphasized here.
First, unlike associations or guilds in many other places or at a national level in China
which have taken off the government‟s jacket and evolved from a department in thegovernment, guilds in Wen zhou tell a very different story. They are the outcomes ofbargain and voluntary unification among enterprises. As many scholars have noticed,
most of the industry associations at national level have been prompted by government
in that the state could design the layout of the associations in respective sectors
according to its own preference and maintain influence in associations‟ agenda settingand task implementation. That is what happened to the abolishment of seven of
China‟s industrial ministries and transformed them into associations in 1990s and inother similar cases. Yet, in Wen zhou, we see the associations booming in an opposite
direction. Most of the guilds or associations bonded themselves spontaneously
without the direct instructions from upper pressure. The self-impetus from thegrass-root level distinguishes bottom-up model from the other top-down one. By theend of the April, 2007, there are more than 131 guilds (associations) registered in Wenzhou. The number is quite big considering the size of the city. According to a survey,
most of the guilds (associations) asserted that the initiatives were in their own hands
and they were organized in the need of market and industry requirement.
The second point to be illustrated is the issue of corporatist representative. We
could assess the limited influence of government from the three different ways informing guilds (association). The first kind was directly established by thegovernment. Request from the government to set up guilds (associations) just existed
for a very short period and at the very beginning in late 1980s in Wen zhou and soon
faded away. The associations authorized by government constitute only a tiny portionof the whole amount. The second kind is the transformation one that were used to becertain ministries or bureaus in the government, as has often been the case at national
level or in other cities which is a historical trail. They been changed into the form ofguilds (associations) but still employ some of the functions inheriting from its original
position. Packing Technology Association is one of them. This kind of guilds(associations) also just comprises of a small part. The main force lies on thoseorganized by the rule of autonomy and voluntary. According to Regulations on theRegistration and Administration of Social Organizations, they need to register in the
Civil Affair Bureau and choose a relative governing body, which would be General
Chamber of Commerce or Economy and Trade Committee. Normally, theorganizations governed by General Chamber of Commerce are called merchant guilds,
and those choosing Economy and Trade Committee as their governing body are calledindustry associations. Yet, the organizations on either side are treated equally by local
government and enjoy the same rights. Therefore, guilds and industry associations areinterchangeable concepts in this context. As is indicated above in a survey, most of theenterprises believed they formed or joined the guilds (associations) by their own will
and were not interfered or obliged by government. General Chamber of Commerceand Economy and Trade Committee offered enough freedom and show great
flexibility to welcome their constituencies.

II self-governing in operation
One reason that the guilds (associations) develop quickly is the autonomy in the
management and agenda-setting. The first of all is the independence of money. Unlike
other organizations in the third sector which probably rely much on the financial
support from outside or from government in China, most of the guilds (associations)in Wen zhou have realized the financial independence. The biggest proportion of theincome comes from the membership fees and special sponsorship or donation byenterprises. The financial autonomy from government helps enlarge the independenceof the guilds (associations) in daily running. In 2005, the government issued an
official regulation that „industry associations‟ should be financially independent fromparty and government organizations suggesting a supportive gesture of guilds(associations) autonomy from government.
The elections of council chairman and members are held independently as well. In
recent years, some guilds (associations) have adopted competitive methods to electtheir leaders and main council bodies. At the same time, they have full rights to follow
their own agenda-setting and strive for their members‟ interests as well as supervise
the members‟ behavior in the respective industry. When governments are still
suffering headache about busy regulating industry self-discipline or market order, theguilds (associations) have freed government from facing such pressure. “Unlike what
happens in many other cities, copyright protection and quality-check have been
missions spontaneously taken by guilds instead of being pushed forward bygovernment”, as a head from one guild put it. A very classic case is the lawsuit ofanti-dumping cigarette lighter against European Union‟s new bill that occurred in
2002. As in such anti-dumping lawsuits, government is not allowed to be involveddirectly, the final victory for the Wen zhou Smoking Set Guild displayed more thaneconomic gains in international market. Civil merchant guilds have learned to set theirown action agenda and implement it beyond government scope.
Lots of guilds (associations) have complete regulations and rules to constrain theirmembers as well as protect their interests by the force of collective action. In thissense, guilds create social capital of trust and networks and increase their leverage inthe bargain with government. Fukuyama argued (2000) that in the absence of civilsociety, state power could often find its chance to maneuver individuals and intrude
the personal space. Only through constrain of excessive individualism, could
individuals seek energy to stop state‟s infinite intrusion. The judgment could apply to
the guilds. As members join in a group and comply with the same game rules under
their own constitution, guilds squeeze out autonomy space from government. The
large sector of guilds and its high autonomy to make and follow its own agenda awayfrom government

directions suggest

an expanding civil space.

Under astate-corporatism regime, associations may have limited freedom in steering thedevelopment direction since state power has made the arrangement for them. In Wenzhou, guilds (associations) are responsible to their members rather than to governmentand government is retreating from its original position.

III Role of Government
The role and motivation of local government in the boost of economy in Wen zhou aswell as in many other places has been explored a lot by scholars. In Wen Zhou, thelocal government adjusted its role in dealing with economic affairs and it has
attempted to reform within the government. The authority transformed its role of„doing nothing‟ at the outset to that of „amount to something‟ (Zhang 1994). In the
beginning, local government was passive in the management of economy. It did not
help cultivate the economy as ambitiously as other local authorities at the start.
Instead, it was the success of private economy that spurred government to take a morepositive role. As Kang argued, since late 1970s as the reform is deepening, thelegitimacy of the regime relies mainly on the performance of economic development.

The criterion to assess and promote officials is economic-oriented, driving local
officials to care about the local economy. (kang 2002). Combining political witheconomic considerations, we could better understand the behavior of local officials.
Parris (1993) argued that the „Wen zhou Model‟ has been the result of conflict,compromise and long-term bargain among the public, local government and central
government. New boundary between state and society has been emerging and a new
relationship seems under construction in Wen zhou. She also noticed the role ofagents in channeling the enterprises with government. However, the role that local
government plays on how to cope with the guilds changes over time. The way and theextent it influences on society take the form opposite to that in other regions. Since
the economic and political transition commenced, the public power in China has
retracted itself gradually from society. The Wen zhou government, on the contrary,reacted in an opposite direction (Yu 2004). It was inactive by neither supporting nor
opposing the status of guilds (associations) when the first round of formation gained
its strength. It was not until 1999 that Wen zhou government issued the regulations ofmanagement of industrial associations in Wen zhou. In 2005, the government
published regulations to further promote the standard development of industrial guilds(associations) as complementary rules. When the political identity and legitimacy ofguilds (associations) were still vague, the local power acquiesced in the new sector‟s
growth.
As local government comes to realize the role the guilds (associations) have playedin an efficient effort of building a clean market that has improved the image of Wenzhou products, it becomes more involved in interacting with guilds (association) affair.
Alongside with the regulations and rules issued to support the guilds (associations),
the two direct governing units responsible for guilds (associations) affair are also seen
being more active in it. The Economy& Trade Committee in Wen zhou has allocated￥750，000 RMB per year to sponsor the guilds (associations) with good performanceand feedback. The General Chamber of Commerce, as the other one, takes theadvantage of its privilege to nominate candidates to local People‟s Congress andPeople‟s Political Consultative Conference to attract their constituencies. In 2003, itrecommended 141 entrepreneurs or leaders of the guilds (associations) to the twobodies. Besides that all the chairmen in the town-level guilds (associations) andbranches outside Wen zhou city have been elected inside the groups, the chairmen of
the General Chamber of Commerce are also elected from the enterprises. The
government officials have quitted serving in the Chamber as an eye for government.
Actually, the government has tried to introduce a new mode to administer the guilds(associations) which is called “governed by Chamber”. It attempts to turn theadministering body into a non-government one, which might contradict the rules
made by Civil Affair Bureau.
With the remarkable growth of the private economy and merchant guilds as its
consequence, the government adapted itself not only by issuing regulations tonormalize the supervision, but also by reforming the bureaucratic institutions andimproving public service quality and efficiency. Since 2001, Wen Zhou Government
launched its reform plan. It not only included the mission demanded from the Central
Government, but was also comprised of the Municipal Administration‟s own portfolio
package. The government promised to withdraw the power inappropriately intervenedin the market, simplify the administrative approval procedure for business, and leave
auxiliary and technical services to the societal intermediary organizations, thus
releasing more space room for the development of merchant guilds. In regard to thestreamline of administrative approval procedure, the government not only shortened
the time but also cancelled some steps in the procedure. Furthermore, theadministration guaranteed the public service would be more transparent to the public.
The intensity and depth of the reform plan in Wen Zhou was regarded going
farther than as required by the Central State. Apparently, the local authority hasrealized that the administration‟s role needed to be adjusted for the sake market andsociety. Where did the motives within the government come from? As scholars
asserted that the legitimacy of the regime now counted largely on the economic
performance to obtain support from people, governments‟ dependence onentrepreneurs increased.

IV Relations between Local State and Merchant Guilds
As the reframing of the economic organizations, the merchant guilds are
established to represent the interests of their respective industries. Besides theirfunction to regulate the members‟ behavior in the market, provide with necessary
service and resource, share information and reduce the cost within the industries, theother big part of role is to influence government in policy making procedure, guard
the industry from being intervened too much by the government, and strive for theautonomy from the public power. In China‟s context, the state attempts to keep thebusiness under the order set by the regime while at the same time, granting them
relative autonomy to deal with their own affairs. Currently, merchant guilds advocate
their advice through four official channels: the first is to formulate proposals to
People‟s Congress or People‟s Consultative Committee and prompt them to pass bills.
The second means is to bring forward suggestions or negotiate with the agencies ordepartments in the government. Very often, the elitists in the organizations would
utilize their private ties and influence to bargain with the government to carry out
laws or policies that are of the merchant guilds‟ interests. This is regarded as an
unofficial way but effective in many situations. A fourth one is to draw up regulations
by the merchant guilds and enforce them on their own industries with the support oracquiesce of government. The first two approaches are more open and official while
the other two rely more on the leaders or elitists‟ personal connection withgovernmental officials. They might be more effective for a short term but jeopardize
the organizations or the public interests in the long run by counting on individuals
instead of cultivating the force of the organizations. All in all, however, the merchantguilds have developed a ripe mode to deal with governments.
Historically speaking, the societal organizations had a close ties with government in
China. Many scholars attributed the feature to the culture of „guanxi‟ which has been
embedded in the society. This partly explains why some merchant guilds opt toestablish closer but more private networks with government. Yet, as moreorganizations found out that transparent and open communications networks will
eventually benefit them more in the long run, they anticipate having more official andopen relationship instead of knocking at the back door. As Douglas Guthrie argues
that the significance of „Guanxi‟ might be facing a decline in China. “There is a
growing emphasis on the distinction between social relationships and the use of thesesocial relationships in the gift economy and managers in the urban industrial economy
are increasingly likely to distance themselves from the institution of guanxi practice inthe economic transition. While managers often view social connections as importantin business transactions, they tend to generally view the importance of guanxi

inmarket relationships as secondary to the market imperatives of price and quality.”(Guthrie 1998:29) Kennedy asserted that clientelism is the micro-level phenomena,and the model privileges viewing direct one-to-one contact between officials andbusinesspeople. (Kennedy 2005:175) From a macro perspective, the wholeenvironment for the communication between government and merchant guilds has
been undergoing in a legal and official framework. On many issues, the government‟s
influence is still large and inevitable. As a nature inherited from traditional Chinesepolitical culture and practical calculation, the guilds are working hard to build private
networks with government. Yet, a legal procedure is undergoing to get guilds(associations) channeled to government.

V Implications
This paper observed the phenomenon of boom of merchant guilds in the city Wen
Zhou of Zhe Jiang Province. The strength of this type of organizations, its effort togovern themselves with regulations, its impact on the local economy has beenchanging their status in dealing with government. More significantly, it has become an
important reason pushing the government to reform from inside and adjusting their
behavior mode to the market and the organizations. The paper examined therevitalization of the merchant guilds (associations) in Wen Zhou, the way that they
govern and regulate themselves, and the role of being representative of the business.
Then the changing role of the government was analyzed as well as their relations withthe organizations. Their motivations were discussed. The bottom-up approach in theresurgence of guilds (associations), the free space the guilds (associations) have been

creating through self-governing, and the evolving role the government played outline
the contour of the situation of guilds (associations) in Wen zhou. In this field, we haveseen traits of a societal-corporatism arrangement.
Civil society has been an important research area in political science, as it has
significant impact on the formulation of certain patterns of interaction between
societyandgovernment.

As

a

main

force

of

civil

society,NGOs(Non-Governmental-Organization) provide social services in spheres that government
might ignore. However, research has been achieved in a Western context. It is true thatthe goals and functions of NGOs have basic similarities regardless of theircircumstances, yet different political and social systems and constitutionalframeworks have different interactions with civil society. Many western scholars haveshowed strong interest in China case, but they tend to start with the same basic
assumption as for a developed country (Alagappa, 2004). This may lead tomisunderstanding in the analysis. The actual role of NGOs and interaction withgovernment are sometimes misread. The development of merchant guilds may haveshown a different case and approach to observe the behavior of non-governmental
actor in China‟s context. As some viewpoint has suggested (Ma 2002), Tracing backto China‟s history and political culture, China‟s societal organizations have always
had closer relations with the state than do their Western counterparts. Today, manyorganizations established by the society from grass-root have requested for more
independence and autonomy. Yet, the relationship with the state would never be as
simple as those in the West. “Instead of measuring how much autonomy Chinese
NGOs do not exercise, we should see, with a more positive attitude, how muchprogress they have made so far in becoming a dynamic force outside of the statesystem”. Judging by this, merchant guilds (associations) have achieved quite a lot ofprogress. The role of local government in the whole scenario is also worthy of being
paid attention. The local state did not follow the central government‟s rules all thetime. At the same time, the local government has started a reform within thegovernment to better adapt to interact with the guilds and the society. Concerning thecomparatively free environment for economy, the growth of merchant guilds in Wen

Zhou might be regarded as an exception in a big picture of the prospects of civilsociety in China. Nonetheless, it has demonstrated a unique approach for thedevelopment of civil society organizations and thrown optimistic light on it.

References:
Jonathan Unger and Anita Chan. (1995). China, Corporatism, and The East Asian Model. The
Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 33, 29-53.
Fukuyama, F. (April, 2000). Social Capital and Civil Society. IMF Working Paper. In Foundationsof Social Capital, Edited by Elinor Ostrom and T.K.Ahn
Lester M. Salamon etc. (December, 2000). Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview. Working
Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project.
Parris, K. (June, 1993). Local Initiative and Reform: The Wenzhou Model of Development. The
China Quarterly, 134.
Philippe C. Schmitter（January, 1974）Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics,
Vol.36, No.1, pp. 85-131
Oi, J. C. (1999). Rural China takes off: institutional foundations of economic reform Berkeley,
University of California Press.
Guthrie, D. (1998). the Declining Significance of Guanxi in China's Economic Transition”, The
China Quarterly, No. 154, (Jun., 1998), pp. 254-282
Kennedy, S. (2005). The business of lobbying in China Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University
Press.

Alagappa Muthiah (2004). Civil Society and Political Chang in Asia: Expanding andContracting Democratic Space. CA: Stanford University Press
Ma Qiusha (2002), Defining Chinese NonGovernmental Organizations. International
Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Vol. 13, No. 2, June 2002
康晓光（2002 年）转型时期的中国社团 http://www.wtolaw.gov.cn
曹海东，张朋. (2004 年). 何能独步中国？温州商会的惊人力量. 《经济》杂志.
陈剩勇, 马斌. (2004 年). 温州民间商会: 民主的价值与民主发展的困境. 开放时代, 138-149.
陈剩勇，马斌. (2007 年). 民间商会与地方治理：功能及限度——温州异地商会的个案研究.
社会科学, 2007 年第四期，58-71.
王诗宗. (2005). 行业组织的政治蕴涵——对温州商会的政治合法性考察. 浙江大学学报, 第35 卷第 2 期，158-165.
吴敬琏. (2003). 建设民间商会.
http://www.wujinglian.net/articles/articles020529.htm.
郁建兴，黄红华，方立明等（2004 年）《在政府与企业之间：以温州商会为研究对象》，浙江人民出版社郁建兴，王诗宗，黄红华等（2006 年）《民间商会与地方政府——基于浙江省温州市的研究》，
中国社会科学出版社
郁建兴，徐越倩，江华,. (2007 年 11 月). 温州商会的例外与不例外——中国公民社会的发展与挑战. 浙江大学学报, 第 37 卷第 6 期，5-15.
郁建兴, 吕明再. (2004 年). 温州商会的兴起: 温州模式研究的政治社会学范式转型. 学术月
刊, 30-36.
赵伟. (1999 年 12 月). 温州力量. 经济学信息报, 1999 年第 1 版.
张仁寿 （1994 年）温州模式：企业、市场与征服职能的新变化. 浙江学刊 1994 年第三期