New Planting Procedure - Summary of Integrated Management Plan

[Insert CB's Company Logo (ifapplicable)]

NPP Reference Number

1007/PT BPN/July/2024

Country of the NPP submission:

Indonesia

RSPO Membership Number

1-0135-12-000-00

Reference to the management unit
management plan

1. SEIA was compiled by Elais
2. Integrated HCV-HCS Assessment was compiled by Aksenta
3. FPIC Process was compiled by Elais
4. Soil and Topography was compiled by Elais
5. GHG was compiled by Elais

Name(s) of estate(s) covered under thismanagement plan:

Koperasi Unit Desa (KUD) Tepian Prima Sawit

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

1

Guidance Notes:
This summary management plan shall indicate at a minimum but not be limited to the following:● Key findings of the various assessments (e.g., potential minor environmental and/or social risk requiring mitigation actions; total conservation areas).
● Key mitigation and monitoring regime, covering both the environmental and social aspects.
● Evidence of FPIC and key agreements with local communities (if any).
● An action plan describing operational actions consequent to the findings of the various assessments, referencing the grower's relevant operational procedures.
● Designation of the management team and responsible person for the implementation.
1

SEIA

Environmental management directions are aimed at significant impacts based on the level of importance of the impact, or impacts thatare not important but have a medium to large magnitude. Environmental management to mitigate Important Negative Impacts andmaintain Important Positive Impacts is carried out using three approaches, namely (i) technological approach, (ii) socio-economic andcultural approach, and institutional approach

Table 1. Plan SEIA management
No1

Significant
ImpactNone

Activities Cause
Impact-ImpactMagnitude-

ImpactImportance Level
None

Land clearing
Medium2

MicroclimatechangeNegatives Not
Important

Construction ofgarden facilities andinfrastructure
LCC Planting

Technological Approach
Pre-Construction Stagena.
Construction Phase▪ Plant vegetation in theemplacement area (preferably
native tree species and/or thosewith deep and strong roots and adienes canopy).

Environmental Management Directions
Social and Cultural Approach

Institutional Approach

na.

na.

-

-

▪ Set a schedule for land clearing andplanting in stages.
MediumPositive Not
Important

Carry out LCC planting according toschedule.

Allocate workers specifically
responsible for LCC planting.

-

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

2

▪ Arrange the pile of chopped tree

Land clearing▪ Installation of signs board andoutreach to the community
about the important value ofrivers and their border areas.

trunks so that it cuts across theslope.
▪ Carrying out soil and water

conservation activities throughenriching vegetation on riverborders (preferably native tree
species and/or those with deepand strong roots and a dense
canopy).

Construction ofgarden facilities andinfrastructure

Low

3

Water quantity:changes in riverdischarge andsurface runoff

Negatives
Important

Water utilization▪ Socialization to land clearing

contractors regarding riverborder boundaries to avoid
over- clearing.

▪ Carry out soil and water

conservation activities using civilengineering techniques such as
making sediment traps ( overflow
or gully plugs) in tributaries,
making silt pits in planting areas
and on either side of the road. sidepit) on undulating land.

▪ Accompany land clearing

Collaboration and cooperation
with the community, government(from village to regional level),other companies regarding riverand border conservation
programs.

contractors and prepare land
clearing minutes.

▪ Determination of border areas

identified as conservation areas
accompanied by marking ofconservation area boundaries.
Making planting
holes
Construction ofwater facilities

Low

Positive Important

Plan drainage designs (number,dimensions, channel connectivity) byconsidering location characteristics,
direction of surface flow, andpredictions of excess runoff afterland clearing.

Important
Negatives

Using polybags with materials that
degrade quickly (bio degradable ) orcollecting plastic waste ( an organic )to be further handled according to
the SOP for Garbage/Waste
Handling.

Soil and water
conservation

4

Accumulation ofplastic waste

Planting oil palm
seedsMediumSupervise the implementation of
SOPs for the creation of water
facilities and SOPs for soil andwater conservation.

--

Implementation of SOP for
Garbage/Waste Handling.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

3▪ Implementation of SOPs for▪ Arrange the pile of chopped tree

trunks so that it cuts across theslope.

▪ Socialization to the community

and installation of signs board
regarding the dangers of land
fires.

controlling forest and land fires( Karhutla ), including
emergency response
mechanisms and reporting to
the authorities.

▪ Collaborate with the▪ Mapping the location of water

sources for handling land fires.

community, village governmentand related parties, so that (ifany) the use of fire for clearing
fields is carried out inaccordance with local customs,
including monitoring andcontrolling fire so that it does
not spread.

▪ mitigation and control task

force supported by training andinfrastructure.

▪ Implement a fire information

5

Potential forland fires

Stack the chopped
tree trunks

Low

Important
Negatives

system, including an early warning
system based on a drought index
or based on monitoring from fire
towers, as well as potential fireincidents or the Fire Danger Rating
System (FDRS).
▪ Carry out maintenance of areasthat have the potential to become
artificial fire breaks, such as garden
roads or elephant ditches,
including (i) reducing theavailability of fuel around theseareas, for example piles of fronds,
twigs or wood, (ii ) the road design
is made slightly convex so that achannel forms at the edge of theroad.
▪ Maintenance of garden roads sothat they can support accessibility
for fire emergency response teams
or patrol teams.

▪ Carry out regular patrols during

the dry season, in accordancewith the provisions in the SOP
for forest and Land Fire Control.

▪ Coordinate with surrounding

companies and with thegovernment, both local andregional levels, to mitigate
forest and land fires.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

4▪ Use of ear plugs as PPE forLand clearing

6

Increased noise

Construction ofgarden facilities andinfrastructure

employees or heavy equipment
operators.
MediumImportant
Negatives▪ Maintenance of heavy equipment

machines to ensure they comply
with technical specifications.

Socialization of the use of PPE to
employees and land clearing
contractors.

Supervise the implementation of
SOPs related to PPE.

Construction ofwater facilities▪ Carrying out soil and waterLand clearing

Construction ofgarden facilities andinfrastructure
7

Low

Important
Negatives

Decreased riverwater quality
Application of
agrochemicalmaterials

conservation activities throughenriching vegetation on riverborders and in emplacement areas(preferably native tree species
and/or those with deep and strongroots and a dense canopy).
▪ Carry out soil and water
conservation activities using civilengineering techniques such as
making sediment traps ( overflow
or gully plugs) in tributaries,
making silt pits in planting areas
and on either side of the road. sidepit) on undulating land.

▪ Outreach to employees

regarding the prohibition of theuse of agrochemicals on riverborders.

▪ Supervise the implementationof SOPs for maintenance ofplanting areas and fertilization
at the borders of water bodies
for all employees.

▪ Collaboration and cooperation▪ Installation of signs board andoutreach to the community
about the important value ofborder areas as river buffers.

▪ Determination of border areas▪ Socialization to land clearing

identified as conservation areas
accompanied by marking ofconservation area boundaries.

contractors regarding riverborder boundaries to avoid
over- clearing.

with the community,
government (from village toregional level), other companies
regarding river and borderconservation programs.

▪ Accompany land clearing

contractors and prepare land
clearing minutes.
▪ Carry out LCC planting according to

Making planting
holes
Construction ofwater facilities

schedule.
Positive Important▪ Design drainage channel designs(number, dimensions, channel
connectivity) taking into account

Allocate workers specifically
responsible for LCC planting.

Supervise the implementation of
SOPs for the construction ofwater facilities.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

5the characteristics, location,
direction of surface flow, and thepotential for excess runoff afterland clearing.
LCC Planting
Expansion of
employment
opportunities

8

Low

Land clearing
Garden construction
Seeding andplanting

MediumPositive Important

Implementation of positive
discrimination policies byprioritizing local workers-

Manpower management inaccordance with statutory
regulations consistently▪ Facilitate increasing

Increasedbusiness
opportunities

9Land clearing
MediumPositive Important

Implementation of positive
discrimination policies byprioritizing local work partners-

Garden construction

professionalism of local
business partners▪ Facilitate improved governanceof local business partnerorganizations

Operation Phase▪ Mapping of channel locations that

10

Water quantity:control ofsurface runoff

Maintenance ofdrainage channels

require priority maintenance.
Low

Positive Important▪ Preparation of a regular

maintenance schedule (1-2 times ayear).

Allocation of resources (funds,
labor) for regular maintenance ofdrainage channels.

-

-

-

▪ Determine the maximum age of11

Increased noise

Harvesting andtransporting FFB

MediumNegatives Not
Important

the FFB transport vehicle in the FFBtransport cooperation agreementwith the contractor.

▪ Slow down vehicle speed when

passing through residential areas(maximum 40 km / hour).

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

6

Gardenmaintenancethrough theapplication of
agrochemicals▪ Preparation and adjustment of

fertilization schedules based on
rainfall predictions.

▪ Outreach to employees

regarding the prohibition of theuse of agrochemicals on riverborders.

▪ Supervise the implementationof SOPs for maintenance ofplanting areas and fertilization
at the borders of water bodies
for all employees.
▪ Collaboration and cooperation▪ Apply manual weeding to planting

12

Decreased water
quality

Fertilization

Low

Important
Negatives

areas located on the borders ofwater bodies.

▪ Installation of signs board andoutreach to the community
about the important value ofborder areas as river buffers.

with the community,
government (from village toregional level), other companies
regarding river and borderconservation programs.

▪ Carrying out civil and technical soil

and water conservation activities
such as making sediment traps (overflow or gully plugs) intributaries, making silt pits inplanting areas and on either side of
the road. side pit) on undulatingland.
▪ Socialization of the K3 program

to employees
13

Workers' healthissuesUse of
agrochemicals

MediumImportant
Negatives-▪ Checking up employee healths

regularly▪ Submission of health evaluation

14

Expansion of
employment
opportunities

Maintenance
FFB Production
Transportation of
FFB

MediumPositive
Important-▪ HIRAC development according

to the physical conditions ofPartnership V plantations▪ Consistent implementation of

K3 policies and procedures▪ Provision of adequate K3

results to employees

facilities and infrastructure

Implementation of positive
discrimination policies byprioritizing local workers

Manpower management inaccordance with statutory
regulations consistently▪ Facilitate increasing

15

Increasedbusiness
opportunities

FFB production
MediumTransportation of
FFB

Positive
Important-

Implementation of positive
discrimination policies byprioritizing local work partners

professionalism of local
business partners▪ Facilitate improved governanceof local business partnerorganizations

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

7▪ Development of CSR programs

related to improving local
community skills andentrepreneurial abilities for
products and services neededby the company/surrounding
community

Existence of
employee housing▪ Good implementation

16

2

Increased
income ofplasma farmers

HCV areas and
HCS forests

FFB Production

MediumPositive Important-

Ensure good communication andopenness of information with
KUD administrators

agricultural practices in plasma
plantations▪ Optimization of plasma
plantation yields

HCV
Area
Summary
The identified HCV/HCVMA No Go area is 802.8 ha with 352.9 ha management area (HCVMA Go), resulting in a total management area is
1,155.7 ha. Some parts of the HCV/HCVMA areas overlap with community land. The net HCVMA No Go area covers 652.8 ha with amanagement area (HCVMA Go) of 317.1 ha. All identified HCS areas considered indicative conservation areas, overlap with HCV areas, andthere are no peatlands in the study area. The land identified as important for community interests covers 190.3 ha, of which 150 ha overlap
with HCV/HCVMA No Go areas, and 35.8 ha overlap with HCVMA Go areas.
Table 2. Recapitulation area of conservation and management areas in the study area
Conservation value
environmentand social
HCS Forest*
Peat
HCV 1
HCV 2
HCV 3
HCV 4
HCV 5
HCV 6
Community land **Size (ha) of conservation
areas within the study
area
486.5
709.3
592.1
468.9
0.2
4.7
190.3

Size (ha) of management
area within the study area
486.5
1,073.5
602.4
527.1
1.6
4.7
190.3

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

8

Net total (combined)

802.8

1,155.7

Information:* total area of forest HCS is 486.5 ha, there is overlap with land public covering an area of 61.0 ha. so wide net HCS area is 425.5 ha based on PADT results (Chapter 9). All net HCS areas
the overlapping overlap with the HC V area** total area land The community within the UM is 190.3 ha of which 150 ha overlapping overlap with HC V/HCVMA No Go area and 35.8 ha of overlap overlap with HCVMA Go

Discussion of HCSA Decision Tree Results
The decision tree process was conducted on 61 HCS patches within the MU and on HCS patches outside the MU within a 1 km radius of
the Management Unit. The decision tree stages implemented were step 1-5, step 11, and step 13, while step 6-12 was not carried out
because all HCS patches had already been designated as HCS conservation areas. The HCS land cover area in stage 1 was 486.5 ha, but it
overlapping with 61 ha of community land, resulting in 425.5 ha of HCS land cover being analyzed through the decision tree process.
The decision tree results for HCS patches indicated that seven patches (ID 1, 9, 34, 54, 59, 60, and 61) were high-priority HCS conservation
areas based on their core areas. The remaining 54 patches had connectivity or overlap with HCV/HCVMA areas, leading to all these HCS
patches being designated as HCS conservation areas. The integration results of conservation areas and land use plans in the Management
Unit showed that the net conservation area (HCV/HCVMA and HCS) was 652.8 ha, with 190.3 ha of community land (185.8 ha overlappingwith HCV areas), and 570.4 ha of potential development area.
Threat Assessment
Table 3. Summary existence mark important and threatening mainlyConservation
value

Summary mark important in the study area

Major Threats

HCV 1

Population endemic fauna and flora species or RTE species▪ Decline extent and quality of animal habitat consequence from logging trees.
fires land. and no exists connectivity with potential habitat outside the UM▪ Hunting animals ( especially orangutans)▪ Decline quality of aquatic habitat consequence residue ingredients
agrochemical and opening cover vegetation in riparian areas ( border river )HCV 3Cover forest secondary to the ecosystem forest plain low
dipterocarpa mixture in rocks sediment status ecosystemthreatened▪ Conversion land
▪ Logging wood
▪ Fire land

HCV 4

Environmental services base related function hydrology inwater bodies ( rivers. lakes. swamps. springs ) including
border areas▪ Decline water quality consequences pollution from residue ingredients
agrochemical▪ Conversion land on the border river

Function absorption and control erosion in hill areas steep▪ Logging wood

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan

9▪ Fire land
Potency service pollination in forest areas secondary▪ Conversion land
▪ Logging wood
▪ Fire land

HCV 5River as community water sources▪ Decline water quality consequences pollution from residue ingredients
agrochemical▪ Conversion land on the border river

HCV 6

The existence of religious and cultural sites▪ Potency conversion land

HCS forest

Fragment vegetation naturally at the border rivers andforest areas dipterocarpa secondary density low▪ Conversion land
▪ Logging wood
▪ Fire land

Table 4. Summary results evaluation threat to mark identified conservation
Conservation
value
HCV 1
Species terrestrial
RTE animals in theecosystem forests( especiallyorangutans, alsokalawiat. langurs.
bird’s predator.
etc.)

Index

2-9,
11- 13,18 -20,22-26,
31-34

Species of aquatic
RTE animals ( alcrocodile. sero
ambush. labi-labi.
kura valve )

2-3, 8,18-20,
22-26

Species RTE plants( al lime. keruing.
and ironwood )3-7,
25-26,
32-34

Source Threat

Source Status Threat

Risk

Intensity
ImpactHunting animal

Some communities have become aware that capturing
orangutans (and other protected animals) is illegal. However,hunting activites still persist, especiallu targeting for foodsources such as deer and rabbit.

Decline population
species animal RTE

MediumOrangutan- humanconflict

Orangutans sometimes appear to plantation and farming
areas especially to look for food.

Man feel threatened Then
endanger orangutans andvice versa

MediumOpening fragment
forest secondary
density low

Some fragments forest secondary density low Alreadysomething is open become a field/ garden.

Habitat loss

MediumHunting animal

Hunting only done in a way opportunist

Decline population
species animal RTE

MediumWater runoff
carries
agrochemical
residues

Agrochemical residues from land agriculture in riparian areas

Decline quality of aquatic
habitatMediumDecline population
species RTE plants

MediumLost cover land forest

Low

Logging wood
Fire forests andland

There is still potential for timber, especially the ulin species.
Logging is till occuring in some fragments of low densitiysecondary forest
Once happen fire big in 1982 and 1997, however in 11 years
final incident fire classified low

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 10

Opening fragment
forest secondary
density low▪ Some fragments forest secondary Already something is open
become a field/ garden▪ Remaining land or Not yet attempted relatively limited

Decline population
species RTE plants

MediumOpening land infragments
vegetation
experience become
land cultivation

There is plan opening land for plantation for group farmer
partners ; remaining land or Not yet attempted relatively
limitedDamage and loss
remainder fragment
vegetation experienceHigh

Decline population
species RTE plants

MediumLost cover land forest

Low

Decline water quality andaquatic habitat
Shallowing of water
bodiesMediumHCV 3

Fragment forest
secondary density
low in theecosystem forest
dipterocarpa
mixture in rocks
sediment

3-9, 13,25-26,
31-34

Logging wood

Fire forests and
land
HCV 4
Environmental
services baserelated function
1-3, 5,hydrology in water
8, 10, 12,bodies ( rivers.
16-30, 33
lakes. swamps.
springs ) including
border areas
Functionabsorption andcontrol erosion inhill areas steep

Potency service
pollination inforest areas
dipterocarpa▪ Land erosion andpollution fromresidue material
agrochemical▪ Conversion landon the borderriver▪ The riverbanks are still covered with natural vegetation, butsome parts are dominated by palm oil plantations▪ The remaining or undevloped land is relaitvely limited,
including some riverbanks▪ Logging wood

There is still potential for timber, especially the ulin species.
Logging is till occuring in some fragments of low densitiy forest▪ Fire land

There were major fires in 1982 and 1997, but in the last 11
years, the incidence of fires has been relatively low
There are plans to open land for plantations for partner farmergroups; however, the remaining or undeveloped land isrelatively limited
There is still potential for timber, especially the ulin species.
Logging is till occuring in some fragments of low densitiy forest
Once happen fire big in 1982 and 1997, however in 11 years
final incident fire classified low

13-15▪ Conversion land
4-6

▪ A number of activity logging wood occurs in fragments of
low-density secondary forest. More likely personal interset
but there are also indications for business (sell and buy).
▪ Access to fragment forest secondary relatively good of themutilise road gardens and roads kingdom
Once happen fire big in 1982 and 1997, however in 11 years
final incident fire classified low▪ Logging wood
▪ Fire land

Lost cover vegetation sothat ability absorption
decreases
Lost cover vegetation
experience

MediumLow

Loss of agent habitat
pollinationHigh

Decline quality forest

MediumDecline quality forest

Low

HCV 5

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 11▪ Decline water
qualityconsequences
pollution fromresidue
ingredients
agrochemical▪ Opening land on
the border river▪ The riverbanks are still covered with natural vegetation, butsome parts are dominated by palm oil plantations▪ The remaining or undevloped land is relaitvely limited,
including some riverbanks

Decline water quality

Medium

M1-M5

Potency conversion
land

Threat classified low. fine public and the Company appreciates
it site existence

Switch function

Low

Overlapwith HCV
area

Conversion land.
logging wood. andfire land
Look threat against
HCV 1, 3, and 4

View threat status against HCV 1, 3, and 4

Lost cover vegetation
natural ( HCS forest area )MediumHigh

Bengalon River andsprings as
Outsidecommunity water UM
sources

HCV 6
The existence ofreligious andcultural sites
HCS forest
Fragment
vegetation
naturally at theborder rivers andforest areas
dipterocarpa

Recommendation for management plan
Table 5. Recommendations management and monitoring of conservation areas in the assessment area
No

Conservation value

Map ID

ThreatProposal Management

Proposal Monitoring

General Recommendations

1

All HCV areas and
HCS forestsAll

See Threat
table▪ Determination and delineation HCV areas and HCS
forests (conservation areas) and establishment
team conservation area managers▪ Formation group conservation area managers withmainly task to managing conservation areas so
there are no more logging trees. encroachment.
burning forest. and hunting animals ;▪ Management Plan Preparation▪ Record and document the management
process carried out (every 6 months)

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 12▪ Engage in socialization with landowners andcommunity groups to build a mutual
understanding to preserve this area and prevent
its conversion to other land uses. Draft amemorandum of understanding that includes thecommunity's commitment not to convert theconservation area to other uses, and find aformula or agreement related to community land
within the study area that is designated as aconservation area
▪ Install information boards about the conservation
area and put-up boundary markers for theconservation area, and inform the surrounding
community about the protection of theconservation area.;▪ Prohibit forest burning and issue warnings to avoid
actions that could cause fires.
▪ Ensure that no hunting of RTE species, endemic,
and protected species occurs by all plantation
staff, workers, and the community.
▪ Collaborate with palm oil plantation companies,
HTI companies, the Forest and Land Fire Control
Unit of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
and the Fire Department for handling forest andland fires.
▪ Form a wildlife patrol team capable of mitigating
wildlife conflicts, including animal rescue, incollaboration with relevant agencies such as
BKSDA, NGOs, and the local community.
▪ Regulate the direction of land clearing indevelopment areas (not conservation) so thatanimal species can move towards the conservation
areas (HCV and HCS).

▪ Monitoring routine (every six month)conservation areas. al with take notes
existence and population species animal
RTE▪ Data collection emerging threats toconservation areas along with elements init▪ Monitoring activity related with utilization
resource natural like hunting. fishing andfarming around conservation areas▪ Patrol fire forest especially at times season
drought

HCV 1
2Orangutan (Pongo
pygmaeus)▪ Prioritize the protection of important orangutan
habitats within the assessment area.

▪ Calculation orangutan population in MU

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 13

▪ Map sightings and the distribution of nests.

3-9, 13,25-26, 3234

loss. hunting
and conflictwith man▪ Develop standard operating procedures (SOP) forhandling human-orangutan conflicts.
▪ Form a special team to manage orangutanconservation.
▪ Provide training to employees for quick response
efforts to avoid conflicts with orangutans.

▪ Determining the population sample formonitoring permanent▪ Recording every appearance of orangutans
in the garden area palm

▪ Install warning signs in orangutan crossing areas.
▪ Collaborate with relevant and competent parties(e.g., BKSDA, NGOs, and universities) in case of
conflicts or conditions that cannot be handledinternally.
▪ Map the distribution of proboscis monkeys andsilvered leaf monkeys to ensure the spread of theirhabitats. Once the habitat locations are confirmed,
they should be designated as priority areas for
management.
▪ Collaborate with relevant authorities to enforce
applicable regulations, especially in cases ofviolations such as hunting.
▪ Designate the natural vegetation cover along theBengalon River (within the HGU) as a conservationarea▪ Ensure that no logging or encroachment occurs in
the riverbank areas.

Look the recommendation for generalmonitoring

3

Kalawait (Hylobates
funereus) andLutung kelabu(Trachypithecus
cristatus)

13

4

Bekantan (Nasalis
larvatus)

18-19, 2225

Habitat loss

5

Beruk (Macaca
nemestrina) andkera ekor panjang(M. fascicularis)

9, 26Consideredpest
agriculture

Development of techniques to drive away pig-tailed
macaques and long-tailed macaques from palm oil
plantations and community fields so that they shift
their roaming areas to natural habitats.

Map location disturbance second species toland cultivation

6

Beruang (Helarctos
malayanus), rusa
(Rusa unicolor),kijang (Muntiacus
muntjak), kancil(Tragulus spp.), babi

Hunting andhabitat loss

▪ Conduct outreach to the community about theprotection of these animals and the prohibition of
hunting them
▪ Establish cooperation with BKSDA East Kalimantan,
Environmental Law Enforcement, and the police toprevent and take action against the hunting ofLook the recommendation for generalmonitoring

loss andhunting

3-7,

32-34

Look the recommendation for generalmonitoring

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 14

janggut (Susbarbatus)

7

Bird predator. al
Elang tikus (Elanus
caerulerus), elang
ikan (Ichthyophaga
ichtyaetus), elangbrontok (Nisaetus
cirrhatus), elang
wallace (N. nanus),etc.

8Bird others. al
Kangkareng perut
putih(Anthracoceros
albirostris), serindit
melayu (Loriculus
galgulus), Takur
tutut (Megalaima
rafflesii), kerak
kerbau(Acridotheres
javanicus)

9

Buaya (Crocodylus
porosus), Labi-labi(Amydacartilaginea), kura
katup (Cuora
amboinensis), sero
ambrang (Aonyx
cinereus)

bears and other protected animals, as well as the
distribution of hunted wildlife

3-7, 13,25-26, 3234

3-7, 13,25-26, 3234

2, 3, 8,18-20, 2224

Loss ofnesting
habitat andhunting▪ Ensure that fragments of natural vegetation
serving as nesting habitats are protected (in linewith general management recommendations).
▪ Conduct outreach about the hunting ban onprotected birds, especially in the Management
Unit (MU), both in plantation areas andconservation areas.
▪ Collaborate with relevant authorities to enforce
applicable regulations, especially in cases ofviolations.

Look the recommendation for generalmonitoring

loss andhunting

Conduct outreach about the hunting ban on thesebirds within the Management Unit (MU) to allplantation staff and workers, as well as to thebroader community. Security personnel stationed at
the plantation entrance should be equipped with theability to disseminate information on important
wildlife protection policies and hunting bans, andtasked with preventing hunting activities.

Look the recommendation for generalmonitoring

Aquatic
habitat
destruction.
poaching forsource food(labi-labi andturtle’s valve)
as well pets (all species )▪ Prevent river pollution, especially from theapplication of agricultural chemicals in palm oil
plantations.
▪ Install information boards on the Bengalon, Koran,and Mengkupa Rivers for passing boats, containing
information about the presence of important
wildlife.
▪ Prohibit the use of poison to catch fish.

Monitoring water quality in lakes and rivers
in a way periodically as possible done
simultaneously with activity monitoring
environment (RKL/RPL)▪ Manage water and river flow according to therecommendations in HCV 4 (High Conservation
Value 4).

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 15

10Species RTE plants
or endemic. forexample: keruing(Dipterocarpus
cornutus), kapur(Dryobalanops
lanceolata), ulin
(Eusirodexylon
zwageri)▪ Collaborate with relevant authorities to inspect
timber produced from the study area. If violations
are found, enforce regulations accordingly.
▪ Install labels or information plates about RTE(Rare, Threatened, and Endemic) plant species.
3-7, 2526, 32-34

Look the recommendation for generalmonitoring

Logging wood

HCV 3

11

Fragment forest
secondary
dipterocarpa rocksediment

3-7, 9, 13,
25-26, 3134

Logging wood.
conversion
land. fire land

▪ The key aspect of managing HCV 3 (HighConservation Value 3) is ensuring the status of
natural vegetation fragments that qualify as HCV 3.
The company should collaborate with landowners
to find ways to maintain natural vegetation cover
without causing negative impacts on thelandowners. Examples of alternatives include: The
company purchasing the land designated as HCV3., oint management, where landowners canutilize non-timber forest products and receive
incentives for not converting the land., Other
similar arrangements▪ The company and partner communities
should develop a management plan thatinvolves the landowners▪ The company should explore the potential benefits
from HCV 3 areas that could provide advantages tothe landowners.

▪ Conduct routine monitoring of thecondition of these natural vegetation
fragments every six years, particularly byrecording any changes that occur.
▪ If logging or land clearing occurs, the HCV
area managers are advised to promptly
engage in a persuasive approach with thelandowners to reach a mutually beneficial
agreement that does not threaten theexistence of the HCV area.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 16

HCV 4▪ Install signboards and conduct awareness sessions
for employees regarding the prohibition of
agrochemical usage along riverbanks.
▪ Perform manual weeding in riverbank areas thatare part of oil palm plantations.

1-3, 5,8, 10, 12,▪ Mark boundaries of buffer zones according to thewidth of each riverbank.

16-30, 33
Land erosion
and residue
material
agrochemical

12

Basic environmental
services related tohydrological
functions in water
bodies (rivers, lakes,
swamps, springs)
including border
areas▪ Prepare minutes documenting the
installation of signboards.
▪ Monitoring function and perform
maintenance on sediment traps (weir/overflow/gully plug)▪ Construct sediment traps (overflow or gully plugs)
in tributaries, particularly in areas with roughterrain. Materials used may include sandbags,stones, wood, or bamboo.

▪ Monitor vegetation growth (% growth) inareas where vegetation enrichment has
been carried out▪ Strengthen riverbanks prone to landslides throughcivil technical approaches or vegetationenrichment. It is recommended to use native tree
species and/or those with deep and strong rootsystems, as well as dense foliage▪ Conduct regular water quality checks (atleast every 6 months) at monitoring points,
namely river inlet and outlet within the
study area. Checks should be done bothvisually and through laboratory testing.

▪ Construct “rorak” both in plantation blocks (siltpit) and on the sides of roads (roadside pit),
especially in areas with bumpy areas▪ Identify communities involved in timber logging
activities
Logging wood

▪ Documenting activity socialization▪ Implement collaborative and participatorycommunity empowerment programs, particularly
targeting communities engaged in timber logging▪ Documenting meeting with stakeholders▪ Periodically (at least every 6 months),
monitor the boundaries of riverbank areas
designated as High Conservation Value(HCV).

▪ Install boundary markers for buffer zone areas
corresponding to the width of each riverbank

Conversion
land on theborder river▪ Install boundary markers to demarcate buffer zone
areas according to the width of each riverbank.
▪ Refrain from replanting in riverbank areas alreadycultivated with oil palm, in compliance with thebuffer zone width of each river.

▪ Periodically (at least every 6 months),
monitor the boundaries of riverbank areas
designated as High Conservation Value(HCV).
▪ Accompany LC contractors and prepare
reports documenting land clearing
activities.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 17

Logging wood

▪ Conduct socialization sessions with LC contractors
regarding the boundaries of riverbanks to avoid
over-clearing.
▪ Collaborate and cooperate with communities,
government bodies (from village to regional
levels), other companies, and NGOs concerning
river conservation programs and riverbank
management.
See the management of HCV 1, 3, and HCV 4 (rivers)
related to timber logging.
▪ Development of Fire Handling SOPs, Including
Emergency Response Mechanisms and Reportingto Authorities▪ Establishment of Fire Mitigation and Control Task
Forces, Supported by Training and Facilities▪ Socialization on the Dangers of Land Fires andInstallation of Related Sign Boards

13

Function absorption
and control erosion
in hill areas steep

13-15Fire land▪ Collaboration with Communities, Village
Governments, and Relevant Parties to Ensure
Controlled Use of Fire for Land Clearing▪ Maintenance of Potential Fire Break Areas, Such as
Garden Roads or Elephant Ditches, including (i)Reducing the Availability of Fuel around These
Areas, such as Palm Fronds, Branches, or Wood, (ii)
Designing Roads with Slightly Raised Edges to Form
Channels on the Roadside▪ Maintenance of Roads to Support Emergency Fire
Response Team Accessibility or Patrol Teams▪ Mapping the Location of Water Sources for Fire
Management▪ Implementation of Fire Information Systems,
Including Early Warning Systems Based on Drought
Indices or Monitoring from Fire Towers, as well as
the Potential for Fire Incidents or Fire Danger
Rating Systems (FDRS)▪ Document meetings held withstakeholders, recording discussions,decisions, and action points.

Look monitoring of related HCV 1, 3, andHCV 4 ( rivers ). logging wood
▪ Documenting the Socialization of SOPs andRecording Reports▪ Recording the Number of Fire Incidents,
Accompanied by Documentation andReports▪ Coordinating with Surrounding Companies
and Government Authorities, both Locallyand Regionally, for Forest and Land Fire
Mitigation▪ Conducting Regular Patrols During the Dry
Season, i.e., from July to September▪ Monitoring Fire Break Areas, EspeciallyDuring July-September▪ Monitoring Water Flow at Water Source
Locations for Fire Handling▪ Documenting Reports Related to FDRSRSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 18

14

Potency service
pollination in forest
areas secondary

04-JunConversion
land. logging
wood. and fireland

See the management of HCV 1 and 3 regarding thepresence of forests.

See the management of HCV 1 and 3
regarding the presence of forests.

At AOI

Decline water
qualityconsequences
residue
ingredients
agrochemicals; opening landon the borderriver

See the management of HCV 4 regarding rivers

See the management of HCV 4 regarding
riversBiannual Meetings to Record the Progress of
HCV Element Management and Document
for each meeting

See the management of HCV 1, 3, and 4
regarding the presence of forests.

HCV 5

15

River as community
water sources

HCV 6

16

The existence ofreligious. historicaland valuable sites
cultureM1-M5

Potency
conversion
land▪ Registering Relevant Stakeholders for Each HCV 6
Area (old village, cemetery, etc.)▪ Establishing Communication with Relevant
Stakeholders (traditional leaders, heirs, community
figures)▪ Encouraging the Development of Management
Plans to Preserve Each HCV Location Participatively

Fragment
vegetation naturally
at the border rivers
and forest areas
dipterocarpa

Overlapwith HCV
area

Conversion
land. logging
wood. and fireland

See the management of HCV 1, 3, and 4 regarding
the presence of forests.

HCS

17

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 19

Table 6. Applicable management general for each HCV and HCS area
Confirmation of HCV -HCS Area
▪ Do delineate HCV and HCS Maps. verify them.
then set it as map definitive conservation area
▪ Make stake HCV and HCS area boundary markers▪ Make board markers in the HCV and HCS areas

Socialization and Engagement HCV -HCS Area
Management▪ Company internal▪ Surrounding communities ( government
villages. institutions customs and society
general )▪ Instance government▪ Companies around

Strengthening Capacity▪ HCV and HCS area monitoring training (identification basic. measurement water quality
and related matters with continuity )▪ Application Standard Operational Proceduresand policies for monitoring HCV-HCS areas
consistent

Conclusion and Recommendations for Delineation and Demarcation Activities:
The field delineation and demarcation results indicate a reduction in the previously designated conservation area as outlined in the
Integrated HCV-HCS Study. This reduction is primarily attributed to land use by local communities for agriculture or plantations, as wellas timber utilization by landowners. The conclusions drawn from this study are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.

The Candidate Partnership Area of KUD Tepian Prima Sawit covers 1,070.4 hectares.
The Indicative Conservation Area of the KUD Tepian Prima Sawit Candidate Partnership is 959.6 hectares.
The Definitive Conservation Area of the KUD Tepian Prima Sawit Candidate Partnership is 517.4 hectares.
There is a difference between the indicative and definitive conservation areas, totaling 442.2 hectares. The definitive
conservation area has decreased by 41.0% from the indicative conservation area (as determined by the Integrated HCV-HCS
Study). The primary factors contributing to the reduction in the conservation area are community activities such as farming andtimber harvesting.
5. Conservation values identified include HCV 1 as a refuge for the protection of RTE species, HCV 3 as threatened ecosystems suchas Lowland Forests on Sandstone and Karst Forests on limestone, HCV 4 as natural cover along the Tebengan River and Kepayau
River, as well as steep slope areas.
6. Then based on the results of socialization with the community and the Company, the proposed area to be developed is 196.1 ha,in which there is still a conservation area of 17.9 ha, in the form of HCV 1, HCV 3, and HCV 4 areas that must be left as aconservation area.
Based on the field findings, several recommendations are proposed for the management plan as follows:
1. KUD Tepian Prima Sawit should develop and implement a management and monitoring plan for the remaining conservation
areas based on the results of delineation and demarcation activities.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 20

2. KUD Tepian Prima Sawit should establish institutional frameworks for the management and monitoring of conservation areas.
3. PT BPN (National Land Agency) should assist and facilitate KUD Tepian Prima Sawit in the management and monitoring activities
of conservation areas.
4. KUD Tepian Prima Sawit should conduct socialization or educational programs for all community members and members of KUD
Tepian Prima Sawit to prevent activities that may disturb or damage the conservation values in definitive conservation areas.
5. For degraded definitive conservation areas (such as rivers and their banks), KUD Tepian Prima Sawit should promptly undertake
rehabilitation by planting local tree species.
6. Permanent demarcation signs should be installed in conservation areas using brightly colored zinc plates to facilitate fieldinstallation.
7. Placement of demarcation signs in conservation areas should prioritize locations that are easily visible.
3

Stakeholder andlocal people
engagement(FPIC process)Based on the results of the FPIC study, it can be concluded that this activity has been conducted among the communities with land
within the partnership area of PT. BPN. These communities live in Tepian Langsat Village, Bengalon Sub-district, East Kutai Regency, East
Kalimantan Province. In this village, there are stakeholders with different roles and interests directly related to the community for land
management. The FPIC process or stages from Stage 1 to Stage 6 (Decision Making) have mostly been completed. Generally, theresidents approve of PT. BPN's partnership program in Tepian Langsat Village, as indicated by the village head's approval and thehandover of land management by the residents to PT. BPN through the Lansia Farmer Group and KUD Tepian Prima Sawit in TepianLangsat Village.
Analysis Social Risk
The analysis of social risk factors is necessary to help minimize negative risks and enhance the performance of PT. BPN and its partners as
the main actors in the partnership program. This risk factor analysis serves as a foundation for future social management, encompassing
an analysis of strategic issues related to Natural Resources (SDA), Human Resources (SDM), Economic Resources (SDE), Social Resources(SDS), Physical Resources (SDF), as well as issues related to CSR programs. Once all strategic environmental and socio-economic issues
have been assessed, the importance of these strategic issues is prioritized considering the following elements:•

Consequences/Impacts is the level of severity/loss that may occur from an interaction between activities and the legal evironment,
natural, and/or socio-economic environment. This can be related to humans, properties, the environment, and others.

•

Likelihood: the probability of occurrence as a result of project activities or operational activities of oil palm plantation partnershipbusinesses.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 21

Risk assessment for FPIC activities in successful partnership plantation areas has been identified, where this assessment also involves
participatory community representatives adjusted with primary data from FGD results, interviews, direct observations, and othersecondary data.
Table 7. Risk Factor Analysis Garden Development Plan PT Partnership. Bima Palma Nugraha
Factor▪ The narrower it lands cultivatedcommunity (Agriculture)▪ Potential happen problem claim land in
Century front by group certain▪ It happened changes in climateparameters temperature

Score
Consequenc
PossibilityeMarkCategory

3

3

9Medium3

3

9Medium

5

1

5

Low

5

2

5

Low

+

5

20

Negligible

+

5

20

Negligible

+

5

20

Negligible

3

3

9

Medium▪ Potential cause happen flood▪ Increasing income and field Work for
public▪ Appearance source income new for
public▪ Management land become the moreproductive▪ Concern happen pollution environment
especially river

Risk Social• Social conflicts based on land can arise.
• Acquisition of land by residents and its conversion into
agricultural land.
Potential land claims between villages, as previously occurred
between Tepian Langsat Village and Tebangan Lembak Village
Land clearing will result in a change of land cover fromvegetated land to open land. This will increase surface
temperature and air temperature, as well as decrease soil
moisture and air humidity.
As a result of vegetation loss, the land's retention capacity
will decrease, leading to increased surface runoff, which
ultimately increases river discharge.
• Increasing income for residents, especially those who aremembers of the Elderly Farmer Groups and members of
KUD Tepian Prima Sawit, due to the expansion ofpartnership land with PT BPN.
• Increased demand for company employees and partners.
Those who have not yet experienced the benefits of previous
partnerships will also benefit now, as some of them may bepart of the groups participating in the current partnershipprogram, which they did not join in the previous partnershipprograms that have been established and yielded results.
According to residents, the expansion area for this partnershipis considered unproductive land after the past fire disasters
because it is currently underutilized by residents. Therefore, itwould be better if this land were managed through apartnership scheme with PT BPN company.
• The use of environmentally unfriendly chemical andpesticides.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 22

▪ It's threatened system eye livelihood
inhabitant as farmer

3

2

6

Medium3

2

6

Medium

5

1

5

Low

5

1

5

Low

5

1

5

Low

3

3

9

Medium

3

3

5

Low

▪ The level ability resident in Work▪ The more reduction of flora and fauna.
▪ Purchasing power low▪ System eye homogeneous livelihood▪ Limitations market access▪ Hunting areas are shifting andincreasing at least animal prey

• Plastic waste from fertilizer packaging, chemical, andpolybag seedlings• Environmental pollution, especially of rivers.
• Social conflicts between the company and village residents
based on land.
• Land acquisition by residents for agricultural purposes.
• Conflict social between companies and citizens villagebased land
• Acquisition land by residents and used as land agriculture
The agricultural, fisheries, and livestock results are not
optimal, and there is a low proficiency among potential
company partnership employees.
Scarcity of protected wildlife and plants/trees.
The demand from residents to be hired as employees by thecompany or as partnership employees will increase. Similarly,
there will be demands for the implementation of social
programs or empowerment initiatives.
There will be a dominant homogeneous livelihood in thepalm oil plantation sector, leading to a decline in income
from food agriculture.
• Low selling prices for community-produced goods.
• Demands on the company to build marketing access,especially roads.
• Decreasin ghunting income• Protest againts the company and partners• Increased demands from residents to be hired as
employees

Recommendation
In every ongoing negotiation stage, evidence and documentation of activities, meeting minutes, attendance lists, and meeting notes foreach negotiation stage must be provided. Recommendations for each stage of agreement drafting and negotiation should be available:
a. FPIC-based agreement drafts negotiated with affected communities. This document is expected to serve as evidence that the FPICbased negotiation process has occurred repeatedly and has finally been agreed upon and documented before reaching anagreement with the Affected Community. As the process is iterative, there may be more than one draft agreement as evidence.
b. Meeting records serve as evidence that the affected community has access to information and advice regarding the proposeddevelopment's impacts and its implications on the agreed-upon agreements.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 23

c. Written evidence of agreements among relevant parties concerning the extent of legal rights, customary rights, and user rights
regarding the collaborated land and evidence of procedures for affected individuals/communities stating their entitlement tocompensation and benefits/allowances due to perceived negative impacts.
d. Evidence of a final agreement or agreement signed jointly by all parties/representatives involved.
Furthermore, as a complement to the application of FPIC values and principles and to ensure that the FPIC process is carried out properly,
the results of implementation based on the signed agreements with partners are evidenced by:a. Documentation of activities and evidence of compensation and/or benefits provided to individuals/groups affected, where they
are entitled to such compensation according to the signed agreements.
b. The existence of SOPs related to complaint mechanisms as evidence that the implementing unit or management unit hasmechanisms to address and resolve complaints effectively, in a timely manner, and appropriately. This complaint mechanism isalso required to ensure that the rights of the complainant are protected, with no risk of retaliation or intimidation as a result of
their report.
c. The existence of conflict resolution and social remediation SOPs and records of community acceptance of the conflict resolution
mechanism (if complaints have occurred) that have been implemented according to the complaints from the affected community.
d. Joint commitment evidenced in writing regarding the implementation of Human Rights policies communicated to the affected
residents (individuals/groups/communities). This policy prohibits retaliation against Human Rights Defenders and prohibits any
potential intimidation or harassment.
Some other recommendations categorized as additional recommendations include:a. Maintaining a participatory approach with the community to build trust and address negative social issues promptly.
b. Planning and implementing CSR activities among the community according to their needs and considering emerging social issues
within the community.
c. Implementing risk management or social impact activities according to the FPIC and SIA studies conducted by the company so thatthe community understands that their concerns can be addressed collaboratively with the company.
d. It is advisable for the company not to make promises to the community that cannot be fulfilled, as this could lead to loss ofcommunity trust and disappointment in the company.
Recommendation Plan
Some follow-up plans that can be carried out include:a. Continuing to socialize with the community regarding the development of PT BPN to promptly address negative social issues.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 24

b. Maintaining a participatory approach with the community to build trust and address negative social issues.
c. Conducting a series of activities to delineate village boundaries and the area of potential partnership plantations of PT BPN for the
preparation of spatial plans for opening or developing potential plantation areas, implemented collaboratively with thecommunity, balancing the strategic plans for implementing assistance activities or CSR in community development.
d. Formulating strategic policies related to the resolution of social issues categorized as medium and low, accompanied by thecompleteness of SOPs, monitoring forms, and evaluations.
e. Coordinating comprehensively with local government authorities regarding the status of community land acquisition, land-based
conflict resolution, and community development programs to realize the work plan for opening or developing partnershipplantation areas of PT BPN in accordance with community aspirations, local initiatives related to environmental adaptation andmitigation around PT BPN.
f. Conducting periodic monitoring and evaluation of work.
4

Soil and
topography

Comprehensive and participatory assessments and management plans are based on several RSPO standard values, one of which is the land
and topography suitability survey. This requirement necessitates the identification of areas (i) of marginal and fragile soils where extensive
planting should be avoided or, if necessary, conducted in accordance with soil management plans for best practices, (ii) where land clearing
cannot be conducted along riverbanks, (iii) where land clearing is not conducted on steep slopes (>25°), and (iv) where land clearing cannot
be conducted on peatlands of any depth. This assessment will provide information on areas that can be cultivated and areas requiringcautionary practices.
Land Suitability
In the aspect of new planting, it is necessary to consider the environmental carrying capacity for the growth and development of thecommodity to be cultivated. This can be assessed through the level of land suitability available. In further analysis, the land suitability value
is represented by the symbols S1 (highly suitable land), S2 (moderately suitable land), S3 (marginally suitable land), and N (unsuitable land).
Further study results show that the majority of the proposed KUD TPS area falls into the "suitable" category (S1 to S3) with a total area of
1,038.6 ha, while the N or "unsuitable" category comprises only a small portion (3 hectares). In contrast, the land suitability results for thedesignated plasma area of KUD TPS indicate that the entire designated plasma area falls within the suitable category (S1 to S3) with a total
area of 196.0 ha, and the N or unsuitable category has a very small area of 0.02 ha.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 25

Table 8. Class suitability land in the KUD TPS partnership area
Determination Area
Plasma Chamber

Slope Class
Area (ha)Proposed Area Partnership
TPS KUD
Area (ha)
%

%

S1

95.2

48.57

340.7

31.8

S2

69.9

35.66

284.8

26.6

S3

30.9

15.76

413.1

38.6

N

0.02

0.01

31.8

3.0

total

196.1

100

1,070.4

100

General conclusions and recommendations
1. The partnership area of KUD TPS is dominated by ultisol and inceptisol soil types. These soils have a moderate acidity level,necessitating management through fertilization and the addition of humus to enhance their fertility for plantation use.
2. There are no histosol soils (organic soil or peatland) identified in the KUD TPS partnership area.
3. The topographic study indicates the presence of very steep slopes (>40%), but their extent is not significant, comprising only 3%(31.8 hectares) of the KUD TPS partnership area. Planting should avoid these areas due to the potential for erosion if the land iscleared.
4. The land suitability in the KUD TPS partnership area generally falls into the suitable category (S1-S3), covering 97% of the area,
while the unsuitable category comprises only about 3%.
5

GHG

The calculation of net GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions, based on the RSPO New Development Greenhouse Gas Calculator procedure(version September 2021), considers three main aspects: GHG emission sources, GHG fixation sources, and carbon credits. The emission
sources are derived from plantation activities and mill activities.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 26

Net GHG emissions from plantation
The calculation results show that the new oil palm plantation will result in a carbon fixation of -627.56 tons CO2e. There are four
components of new plant maintenance that are sources of GHG emissions. However, the largest carbon fixation comes from the growthof oil palm biomass.
Table 9. Projected estimates of net GHG emissions from new plantations
Sources
Land clearing
Crop sequestration
Fertilisers
N2O
Field fuelPeat
Conservation credits
total

total Emissions( tons of CO 2 e)773.61-1,616.22
107.29
80.14
27.63
0.00
0.00
-627.56

Emissions /Area( ton CO 2 e/ha)

Emissions /Produced( ton CO 2 e/t FFB)
4.16
-8.70
0.58
0.43
0.15
0.00
0.00
-3.38

0.44
-0.91
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
-0.36

Note : The value (-) indicates fixation carbon

Net GHG emissions from factory
The estimated factory emissions are based on the general management patterns of the company’s operational factories. The sources of
GHG emissions from processing in the factory include (i) factory waste (Palm Oil Mill Effluent/POME), (ii) fuel used for the factory (millfuel), and (iii) purchased electricity for factory operations. The processing in the factory does not have any GHG absorption sources.
Calculations show that the net GHG emissions from processing in the factory amount to 350.18 tons of CO2e.
Table 10. Projected estimates of net GHG emissions from factory processing
Sources
POME
Mill fuelPurchased electricity
Credit (excess electricity exported)
Credit (sale of biomass for power)
total

total Emissions( tons of CO 2 e)346.49
3.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
350.18Emissions /Area( ton CO 2 e/ha)

Emissions /Produced( ton CO 2 e/t FFB)
1.86
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.88

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 27

0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20

Overall Net GHG Emission
Net emissions are calculated by summing the net emissions from the plantation and the processing at the mill. Overall, the largest sourceof GHG emissions comes from mill waste, while the only source of carbon fixation, and the largest value, comes from carbon absorption
from the growth of new plants. The total net GHG emissions from the plantation and the mill indicate that the new plantation and its
processing will result in net GHG emissions of -277.37 tons CO2e.
Table 11. Estimates net GHG emissions from plan planting new and processing in the factory
Field Emission (tonCO 2 e)Mill Emission (tonCO 2 e)
total Emissions (tonCO 2 e)
total Emissions /Area (ton CO 2 e/ha)
total Emission/Produced (tonCO 2 e/ tonCPO )total Emission/Produced (tonCO 2 e/ tonPK )-627.56
350.18-277.37
-1.49
-0.60
-0.60

GHG Emission Mitigation Scenarios
The scenarios are developed by reconsidering the primary sources or sinks of emissions identified within the potential areas for new
planting that can be reserved for conservation, as well as operational practice options that can be applied to reduce GHG emissions. This
study creates three scenarios for testing. The first scenario is the baseline, which shows the development plan and GHG emission
projections without any mitigation efforts. The second and third scenarios present alternative development plans to reduce GHG
emissions. The second scenario involves only maintaining conservation areas, while the third scenario includes the addition of methane
capture facilities.
Table 12. New plantation development scenario
Scenario
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3

Areas to avoid for development

Description
Land clearing is conducted in all potential areas for new oil palm plantation development, including conservation areas. There
are no planned methane capture facilities for the palm oil millLand clearing is conducted in all potential areas for new oil palm plantation development, except for conservation areas. There
are no planned methane capture facilities for the palm oil mill.
Land clearing is conducted in all potential areas for new oil palm plantation development, except for conservation areas. There
are methane capture facilities planned for the palm oil mill.
Treatment
S1
S2
S3
Conservation area
0 ha
17.9 ha17.9 haRSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 28Potential area for development new

POME Processing

Lowland forest Secondary Density
Low
ShrubsBushField
Oil palm plantation
Conventional
Methane capture

17.9 ha

0 ha

0 ha

140.0 ha24.8 ha7.7 ha5.7 haY-

140.0 ha24.8 ha7.7 ha5.7 haY-

140.0 ha24.8 ha7.7 ha5.7 haY

Table 13 Comparison projection net GHG emissions of each scenario
SourceLand clearing
Crop sequestration
Fertilisers
N2O
Field fuelPeat
Conservation credits
Net Field Emissions
POME
Mill fuelPurchased electricity
Credit (excess electricity exported)
Credit (sale of biomass for power)
Net Mill Emissions
Net Field and Mill Emissions (tonCO 2 e)
Net Emission/Production (tonCO 2 e/ tonCPO )Net Emission/Production (tonCO 2 e/ tonPK )Emissions
S1
Field emissions & credit (tonCO 2 e)773.61-1,616.22
107.29
80.14
27.63
0.00
0.00
-627.56
Mill emissions & credit (tonCO 2 e)346.49
3.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
350.18-277.37
-0.60
-0.60

S2

S3
621.50-1,581.29
97.50
72.83
25.10
0.00
-43.86-808.21621.50-1,581.29
97.50
72.83
25.10
0.00
-43.86-808.21314.86
3.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
318.22-490.00
-1.16
-1.16

32.75
3.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.11
-772.11
-1.83
-1.83

Conclusion
1. Significant sources of GHG emissions from the new planting and plantation management plans consist of land clearing and millwaste, while GHG fixation sources consist of biomass growth.

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 29

2. The net GHG emissions from the baseline scenario of plantation development and management are -277.37 tons CO2e, or
equivalent to -0.60 tons CO2e/ton CPO and -0.60 tons CO2e/ton PK.
3. The study results in three alternative development scenarios: (i) the baseline development plan (without mitigation efforts), (ii) a
development plan scenario with measurable GHG emission mitigation that preserves conservation areas, and (iii) a development
plan scenario with measurable GHG emission mitigation that preserves conservation areas and includes methane capture facilities.
4. The implementation of mitigation scenarios results in a reduction of GHG emissions from the baseline, reaching 0.56 tons CO2e
for the application of scenario 2 and 1.23 tons CO2e for the application of scenario 3.
Recommendation
1. Selecting and implementing the second scenario to minimize GHG emissions while still minimizing the operational costs of thecompany from the plan for the development and management of new plantations.
2. Developing more detailed and measurable mitigation and monitoring plans to be applied to company operational standards.
3. Integrating the selected mitigation scenarios with the plan for managing new plantations.
4. Increasing productivity as one of the efforts to reduce GHG emissions.
5. Identifying and implementing other mitigation efforts in day-to-day operational activities, such as electricity and fuel savings,
among others.
6

Acceptance ofManagement
Plans

Name of Person
Responsible

Agustinus Triwibowo

Designations

Compliance & Management System Division Head

Signature

Date

17 May 2024

RSPO NPP 2021 Summary of Integrated Management Plan 30