Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Ichthys Field Development
Commonwealth
Environment Protection &Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
Referral Document
Doc No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Revision: 0

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 1 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

ReferralImportant Note:
Please read the Referral Guide and associated Fact Sheets (available at http://www.deh.gov.au/epbc)
carefully. The guide and Fact Sheets will help you to complete the form correctly and ensure that yourreferral is in a form that can be processed. The completed form, together with the required maps and anyother information you may wish to submit, should be sent to the EPBC Act Referrals Section, Approvals andWildlife Division, Department of the Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 787, Canberra, ACT, 2601 and/or
by email to epbc.referrals@deh.gov.au (see Referral Guide for allowable electronic formats).

1. Contacts and proponent
1.1 Person making the referral (the person that has the responsibility to prepare this document)(Note: The term “person” can refer to an individual or a corporation)
INPEX BROWSE LTD.
Level 35, Exchange Plaza, 2 The Esplanade
Perth, Australia 6000
Telephone:+61 8 9223 8433
Fax :+61 8 9223 8455
Contact:
Position:
Email:

Mr. Sean Kildare
External Affairs Manager
skildare@inpex.com.au

1.2 Person(s) proposing to take the action (the person accountable for meeting any conditions
attached to an approval for the action to be undertaken)
INPEX BROWSE LTD.
Level 35, Exchange Plaza, 2 The Esplanade
Perth, Australia 6000
Telephone:+61 8 9223 8433
Fax :+61 8 9223 8455
Contact:
Position:
Email:

Mr. Shinsuke Ban
General Manager
sban@inpex.co.jp

1.3 Person(s) who will be the proponent for the action (the proponent is responsible for the
preparation of all assessment documentation. Generally the proponent is the same as the person
taking the action because the assessment documentation will contain commitments from the person
taking the action ie. The individual or organisation that will be held accountable for meeting thosecommits.)
As per 1.2 above.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 2 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

2. Description of the proposal
2.1 Provide a summary description of the action (two or three sentences)
INPEX Browse is proposing to develop the Ichthys gas-condensate field using offshore facilities and agas-condensate processing and LNG production and export facility that would be built on the Maret
Islands (North and South), in the Bonaparte Archipelago off the Kimberley Coast. Champagny Island
to the south of the Maret Islands, is an alternative location under consideration. Marets and theChampagny Islands are within the Shire of Wyndham East Kimberley. However, during thecourse of further studies a third location may have to be considered. The operating life of the project is
expected to extend beyond 30 years. Potential expansion of the facility may extend the life of the
project beyond this period.

2.2 Details of the location of the project area
The Ichthys Field Development involves the offshore permit area WA-285-P R1 located in the Browse
Basin on the North West Shelf of Western Australia approximately 440 km north of Broome and800 km south-west of Darwin (Figure 1). The permit encompasses an area of approximately 3041 km2
with water depth ranging from 90 to 340 m. The permit is held and operated solely by INPEX.
The proposed offshore semi-submersible Central Processing Facilities (CPF) and associatedinfrastructure are likely to be located within the Ichthys Field. The proposed location of the CPF
within the Ichthys Field is at 526825E, 8465666N (GDA 94). The field measures approximately
40 km by 20 km. Water depth in this region is between 230 m (LAT) to 280 m (LAT).
The exact route of the subsea export pipeline is yet to be determined, but will approximate a directroute from the offshore facility to South Maret Island accounting for any subsea obstructions that may
be found during the route survey. The length of the subsea export pipeline to the shore crossing will
be approximately 200 km.
The Maret Islands (preferred development site) and Champagny Island (alternative development site)
are the two sites currently under consideration for land based development. South Maret Island islocated at 713932E, 8402528N (GDA 94) whilst Champagny Island is located at 634962E, 8308686N(GDA 94).
Depending on the results of detailed site selection studies, INPEX may consider a third location if the
Maret or the Champagny Islands prove unsuitable

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 3 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Figure 1: Location of Permit Area WA-285-P R1

Attach an A4/A3 size map/plan(s) showing the location and approximate boundaries of the area inwhich the project is to occur (this map, or a second attached map, should also show features
mentioned in responses to questions in Part 3 of this referral, for example, conservation reserves,
areas of remnant native vegetation, streams and roads).

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 4 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

2.3 Provide the timeframe in which the action is proposed to occur. Include start and finish dates
where applicable.
Development Stage

Start

End

Concept Selection

2Q 2006

3Q 2006

Concept Definition

4Q 2006

4Q 2007

FEED

4Q 2007

4Q 2008

FID

4Q 2008

Initial Development Drilling

3Q 2011

2Q 2012Construction and Commission

1Q 2009

Mid 2012

Production

Mid 2012

TBA

2.4 Provide a description of the action, including all activities proposed to be carried out as partof the proposed action.
Exploration programs have indicated the presence of significant natural gas and condensate volumes
in the permit area. The Ichthys Field consists of two reservoirs, Brewster Member and Plover
Formation. Estimates of the recoverable hydrocarbon resource indicate over 269 000 Mm3 (9.5 Tcf) ofgas, and 49.6 GL (312 MMbbls 1 ) condensate. The estimated CO2 content averages 8.5 % in the
Brewster Member and 17% in the Plover Formation.
The Project proposal includes the transport of two phase gas from the Ichthys field via a subsea
pipeline to the proposed onshore processing facilities located on South Maret Island. The proposed
subsea pipeline route from the field to South Maret Island is illustrated in Figure 2.

1

MMbbls (‘million barrels’) is the standard oil field unit, and Mm3 (million metres cubed) is the Standard
International (SI) unit for hydrocarbon liquids.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 5 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Figure 2: Proposed Development Area with Pipeline Route, Onshore Area and Key Locations. (Inset: Maret Islands)

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 6 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

The offshore development concept consists of a number of drilling centres (subsea wells andmanifolds), with infield flowlines/flexible risers for submarine transfer of the reservoir fluid to the
CPF. Dehydrated two phase gas will be exported to the Maret Islands via a subsea pipeline. Figure 3
illustrates the offshore development concept.

Figure 3: Indicative Schematic of the Offshore Facilities

An alternative CPF concept involves the installation of a fixed structure (TLP, Jacket, etc.) in thepermit area, or the installation of a fixed platform in shallow water (100 – 120 m) approximately
35 km to 50 km from the field. This would be located in Commonwealth waters adjacent to the subsea
pipeline route to either South Maret Island or Champagny Island. Additional CPF’s and looping of thesubsea pipeline may be required for the full development of the field.
The proposed onshore processing facilities consists of the slug catcher, gas treatment plant(condensate and LPG extraction, CO2 removal) and LNG plant, with the slug catcher and gas
treatment plant being integrated upstream of the LNG plant. The maximum capacity of the LNG Plant
will extend up to 12 Mtpa comprising two 6 Mtpa trains.
The Project will come under Commonwealth jurisdiction for offshore facilities and the offshore
component of the subsea gas export pipeline, and Western Australian jurisdiction for near-shore (i.e.
within 3 nautical miles of the coast) and onshore facilities.
The main components of the Ichthys Field Development include:•
Subsea wells and manifolds tied back to the CPF•
Subsea gas export pipeline to shore•
Onshore gas pipeline•
Onshore processing facilitiesoPhase 1 – 1 x 6 MtpaoPhase 2 – 1 x 6 Mtpa (at some time in the future)

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 7 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

•
•
•
•
•
•

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Onshore storage for condensate, LPG and LNG
Materials Offloading Facility (MOF)
Product offloading jetty(s)AirportAccommodation and associated infrastructure
Causeway between South and North Maret Islands.

These components are described in detail below.
Satellite Subsea Wells and Manifolds Tied Back to Central Processing Facilities•
Production Rates: the production rates of the facilities will vary between approximately
34 Msm3/d (1200 MMscfd) in Phase 1 and a total of 68 Msm3/d (2400 MMscfd) when the 2nd
LNG train starts up in Phase 2•
Drilling centres will be installed to support approximately 35 to 40 wells phased over the field
life. The exact number, location and timing of the drilling centres and wells can only be
determined after gaining some production performance data from the field•
Exact (or nearest to) location: the proposed CPF location is at the coordinates indicated in
Section 1.3•
Water depth: 230 m (LAT) to 280 m (LAT)•
Use of additives etc: MEG/Methanol will be required for hydrate inhibition of subsea
flowlines; corrosion inhibitors and wax inhibitors may also be required•
Discharges: the main discharges to air will be the combustion gases from the power generationand gas compression turbines.
•
Gas compression: timing and amount of compression required will depend on production rates
selected and the performance of the field over time.
•
Flaring: will be minimised as far as practical other than where required for safety reasons•
Manning requirements: 50-100 personnel depending on operating and maintenance philosophy
adopted•Service requirements (boats, aircraft) etc: main mode of personnel transport to these offshore
facilities will be by helicopter. Supply boats will deliver materials/goods on a regular basis tosupport operation and maintenance activities.
Subsea Gas Export Pipeline to Shore•
Length: approximately 200 km•
Location: as shown in Figure 2•
Size: 863.6mm (34") to 1016mm (40") nominal bore•
Materials: carbon steel•
Construction features: secondary stabilisation of the pipeline will be required and will involve
trenching and/or rock dumping•
A second pipeline may be required in parallel with the first pipeline for the expansion of LNG
production.
Onshore Gas Pipeline•
Length: approximately 1 km•
Location: South Maret Island•
Materials: carbon steel•
Below ground at shore crossing to plant•
Tracks and racks within plant.
Onshore Processing Facilities•
South Maret Island•
Phase 1 – 1 x 6 Mtpa train•
Phase 2 – an additional 1 x 6 Mtpa train

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 8 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document•••

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Emissions: green house gases will be a major emission from the plant. INPEX is currently
studying various alternatives to manage this issue.
Flaring: will be minimised as far as practical other than where required for safety reasons
Discharges: cooling water.

Onshore Product Storage•
Location: South Maret Island•
Product stored: LNG, propane, butane and stabilised condensate•
Stored volumes: For Phase 1 LNG 280 000 m3, propane 80 000 m3, butane 50 000 m3,
condensate 120 000 m3. For Phase 2 additional storage will be required or alternatively more
frequent offloading of productMaterials Offloading Facility (MOF)•
Location: South Maret Island•
Land-backed structure with a face wall comprising tied-back tubular interlocking piles.
•
This will also service the offshore and onshore producing operations after the start ofproduction during the life of the field.
•
A breakwater will be required.
Product Offloading Jetty(s)•Location: South Maret Island•
One or two offloading jetties may be required depending on production rates and frequency of
product offloading•
Construction: precast concrete and/or steel•
Length: 400 m (possible breakwater required).
Airport•
Location: North Maret Island•
Runway dimensions: minimum 2000 m long•Type of fixed wing aircraft: BAe146 or comparable•
Helipad to support of the offshore operations.
•Refuelling facilities.
Accommodation and Associated Infrastructure•
Accommodation camp – location and capacity: North Maret Island. During construction
accommodation will be provided for a peak workforce of approximately 2000 to 3000
personnel. During producing operations accommodation will be provided for approximately
300 - 400 personnel depending upon final plant operation and maintenance philosophy•
Personnel will rotate on a ‘fly-in/fly-out’ basis because of the remote location•
Access roads: based on laterite backfill with bitumen coating to seal•
Power generation: gas-turbine driven power generators, diesel-fired blackstart generators on
standby•Water supply: potable and plant use by desalination of sea water by reverse osmosis•
Waste water: including sewage treatment plant will be provided.
•
All buildings and infrastructure will be designed and constructed to withstand the regions
cyclonic conditions using industry accepted standards and criteria.
Workforce•
During construction accommodation will be provided for a peak workforce of approximately
2000 to 3000 personnel•
During producing operations accommodation will be provided for approximately 300 - 400
personnel depending upon final plant operation and maintenance philosophy•
Personnel will rotate on a ‘fly-in/fly-out’ basis because of the remote location

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 9 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Causeway between North and South Maret Islands•
Dimensions: approximately 500 m in length•
Construction materials: reinforced concrete base with culverts covered with core of laterite
which in turn is covered with twin layer of rock armour.
2.5 Provide an explanation of the context in which the action is proposed to take place, including
any relevant planning framework (for example, relevant management plans or State or Local
Government approvals). Indicate whether, and in what way, the action is related to other actions
or proposals that may have already occurred, are occurring, or are likely to occur, at a futuredate. You should also provide the name(s) of the Local Council and/or Local Government Area
the action will take place in, if relevant.
INPEX is a Japanese oil and gas company headquartered in Tokyo, with substantial interests in oil andgas projects in Australia and internationally. As the sole permittee, INPEX intends to develop the
Ichthys Field to produce condensate, LPGs and LNG for export. Initial production will be sold into
Japan and other export markets in the Asia-Pacific region.
Commonwealth Legislation
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 is the primary piece oflegislation for the protection of environmental matters of national significance. This proposal will bereferred to the Commonwealth Department for the Environment and Heritage in accordance withrequirements of the EPBC Act 1999.
Other relevant Commonwealth legislation and regulations include, but are not limited to:•Australian Ballast Water Management Requirements and Australian Quarantine Regulations•
Australian Heritage Commission Act (No 1) 2003•
Australian Heritage Commission Act 1975•
Australian Maritime Safety Authority Act 1990•
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000•
Environmental Protection (Sea Dumping) Act 1981•
Fuel Quality Standards Act 2000•
Hazardous Waste (Regulations of Export and Imports) Act 1989•
Historic Shipwrecks Act 1976•
Native Title Act 1993•
Navigation Act 1912•
Ozone Protection and Synthetic Greenhouse Gas Management Act 1989•
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) (Management of Environment) Regulations 1999•
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1967•
Protection of the Sea (Prevention of Pollution from Ships) Act 1983•
Quarantine Act 1908•
Sea Installations Act 1987.
Western Australian Legislation
The Environmental Protection Act 1986 represents the primary statute for the protection of theenvironment in the State of Western Australia. This proposal will be referred to the Western
Australian Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in accordance with the requirements of theEnvironmental Protection Act 1986.
Other relevant Western Australian legislation and regulations that are likely to apply to this proposal
include:•Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972•
Agriculture and Related Resources Protection Act 1976

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 10 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Clean Air Regulations 1967
Conservation and Land Management Act 1984
Dangerous Goods (Transport) Act 1998
Environmental Protection (Clearing of Native Vegetation) Regulations 2004
Environmental Protection (Controlled Waste) Regulations 2004
Environmental Protection (Liquid) Waste Regulations 1996
Environmental Protection (NEPM-NPI) Regulations 1998
Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997
Explosives and Dangerous Goods Act 1961
Jetties Act 1926
Land Administration Act 1997
Local Government Act 1995
Marine and Harbours Act 1981
Maritime Archaeology Act 1973
Pearling Act 1990
Petroleum (Submerged Lands) Act 1982
Petroleum Act 1967
Petroleum Pipelines Act 1969
Pollution of Waters by Oil and Noxious Substances Act 1987
Port Authorities Act 1999
Shipping and Pilotage Act 1967
Soil and Land Conservation Act 1941
Western Australian Marine Act 1982
Wildlife Conservation Act 1950.

International Covenants and Agreements•
Chinese Australia Migratory Birds Agreement (CAMBA)•
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)•
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species (CMS)•
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (Bonn Convention)•
International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships 1978 (MARPOL)•International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Co-operation 1990•
Japan Australia Migratory Birds Agreement (JAMBA)•
Protocol to International Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping ofWaste and Other Matter 1972 (London (Dumping) Convention 1972)•
Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer•
World Bank EIA Standard/Guideline.
Ancillary Approvals, Permits and Licences
In addition to Ministerial Approval and any conditions attached to such approval, a number ofancillary approvals, permits and licences will be required to enable construction and operation toproceed. Such permits and licences include, but are not limited to:•Dredging Permit•
Sea Dumping Permit•
Dangerous Goods Transport Licences•
Vegetation Clearing Permit•
Works Approval Permit•
Licence to Operate/Emit•
Pipeline and infrastructure licences•
Sea Installations, Drilling and Works Approvals•
Consent to Construct

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 11 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document•

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Production Licence.

Numerous Environment Plans or Environmental Management Plans under relevant Commonwealth orState legislation will also be required for drilling and well installation, pipe lay, operations andultimate decommissioning of facilities.
Local Government Jurisdictions•
Onshore facilities:
Maret Islands, Shire of Wyndham – East Kimberley.
•
Construction and supply base: Broome, Shire of Broome.
2.6 If you are considering making a referral of a stage or component of a larger action, you must
provide information about the larger action and details of any interdependency between thestages/components and the larger action. If appropriate, you may also provide justification as towhy you believe it is reasonable for the proposed action, that is the subject of this referral, to beconsidered separately from the larger proposal (see the Referral Guide).
Section 74A of the EPBC Act provides that the Environment Minister may not accept a referred
action that is a component of a larger action. If the Environment Minister does not accept thereferral, he or she is not permitted to make a decision on whether the action is a controlled action.
The Environment Minister may request the person proposing to take the action to refer the larger
action for consideration under the EPBC Act (see also Fact Sheet).

Development of the Ichthys Field is not related to any other proposals.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 12 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

3. Description of the project area and the affected area
Note: You must include a map(s)/plan(s) clearly showing the location of the action, and any relevant
features referred to in 3.1. (A general location map (eg, 1:250 000 scale) and a more detailed map/planshowing the elements of the proposal may be appropriate. If available, an aerial photograph or otherphotograph of the site can be included.)

3.1 Describe the affected area referring, as appropriate, to attached maps, plans and aerial photos. In
particular, indicate on the map the location of any of the following features: World Heritage properties,
National Heritage places, Ramsar wetlands, listed threatened species or communities and/or known
habitat for these species or communities, listed migratory species and/or known habitat for these
species, Commonwealth marine areas and Commonwealth land, listed Commonwealth Heritage places,
conservation reserves/parks, and areas of remnant native vegetation.
Kimberley Coast
The Kimberley coast is characterised by a broad continental shelf dotted with reefs, banks, shoals andnear-shore islands, often fringed with coral reefs (Burbidge, McKenzie and Kenneally 1991). The
coastline is remote and mostly inaccessible with little supporting infrastructure. Population density issparse, with the exception of Broome in the south, and remote coastal communities such as Derby and
Kalumburu.
Over 2000 islands extend throughout the Buccaneer and Bonaparte Archipelagos. Tidal ranges in thisarea are extreme (up to 10 m), which produce turbid waters that may extend seaward for several
kilometres.
The regional climate is typically tropical with distinct wet and dry seasons. Rainfall is highly seasonaland is characterised by a heavy tropical signature with monsoonal and infrequent cyclonic rains during
summer. Annual average rainfall is highly variable, with a median average rainfall of 600 mm at
Broome and 622 mm at Derby, with most rainfall occurring during the summer months (Bureau of
Meteorology 2006).
The EPBC Act Protected Matters Search Tool was accessed on 04/04/06 and a report generated for thedevelopment area including Champagny and North and South Maret Islands, infield facilities andpipeline routes. The search area is described in Appendix 1.
A summary of search outputs is provided in Table 1 and confirms there are no World Heritage
Properties, National Heritage Place, Wetlands of International Significance or Threatened EcologicalCommunities in the proposed development area. 15 threatened species, 30 migratory species, 72 listed
marine species, and 24 cetacean species may occur in the development area. The listed species
includes various species of pipefishes, seahorses, sea snakes, turtles and crocodiles. Further details of
the threatened and migratory species are provided in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively. An historic
shipwreck located at Browse Island also appears on the National Register of Estate.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 13 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Table 1: Protected Matters Report Summary for Maret Islands and Surrounding Waters

MatterStatusWorld Heritage Properties

None

National Heritage Places

None

Wetlands of International SignificanceNone

Commonwealth Marine Reserves

Relevant

Threatened Ecological Communities

None

Threatened Species

15

Migratory Species

30

Commonwealth Lands

None

Commonwealth Heritage Places

None

Place on Register of National Estate

1

Listed Marine Species

72

Whales and Other Cetaceans

24

Critical Habitats

None

Commonwealth Reserves

None

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 14 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Table 2: Threatened Species
Threatened Species

Birds
Erythrotriorchis radiatus
Red goshawk
Erythrura gouldiae
Gouldian finch
Geophaps smithii blaauw
Partridge pigeon (western)
Malurus coronatus coronatus
Purple-crowned fairy-wren(western)
Tyto novaehollandiae kimberli
Masked owl (northern)
Mammals
Balaenoptera musculus
Blue whale
Dasyurus hallucatus
Northern quoll
Megaptera novaeangliae
Humpback whale
Mesembriomys macrurusGolden-backed tree-rat
ReptilesCaretta caretta
Loggerhead turtle
Chelonia mydas
Green turtle
Dermochelys coriacea
Leathery turtle, leatherback
turtle, luth
Eretmochelys imbricata
Hawksbill turtle
Natator depressus
Flatback turtle
SharksRhincodon typus
Whale shark

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

StatusVulnerable
Endangered
Vulnerable
Vulnerable

Presence TypeSpecies or species habitat likely
to occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area

Vulnerable

Species or species habitat may
occur within area

Endangered

Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Breeding known to occur within
areaSpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

Endangered
Vulnerable
Vulnerable

Endangered
Vulnerable
Vulnerable

Vulnerable
Vulnerable

Vulnerable

Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Breeding known to occur within
areaSpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area

Page 15 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Table 3: Migratory Species
Species

Migratory Terrestrial Species
Birds
Coracina tenuirostris
melvillensis
Melville cicadabird
Erythrura gouldiae
Gouldian finch
Haliaeetus leucogasterWhite-bellied sea-eagle
Hirundo rustica
Barn swallow
Petrophassa smithii blaauwi
Western partridge pigeon
Poecilodryas superciliosa
cerviniventris
Derby white-browed robin
Rhipidura rufifrons
Rufous fantail
Migratory Wetland Species
Birds
Charadrius veredus
Oriental plover, oriental
dotterelGlareola maldivarum
Oriental pratincole
Numenius minutus
Little curlew, little whimbrel
Migratory Marine Birds
Puffinus leucomelas
Streaked shearwater
Sterna anaethetus
Bridled tern
Sula leucogaster
Brown booby
Migratory Marine Species
Mammals
Balaenoptera bonaerensis
Antarctic minke whale, darkshoulder minke whale
Balaenoptera edeni
Bryde's whale
Balaenoptera musculus
Blue whale
Dugong dugon
DugongMegaptera novaeangliae
Humpback whale
Orcaella brevirostris
Irrawaddy dolphin

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

StatusPresence Type

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area

Migratory
Migratory
Migratory
Migratory

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area

Migratory

Migratory
Migratory
MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Breeding known to occur
within area
Breeding known to occur
within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area
Breeding known to occur
within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area

Migratory
Migratory
Migratory
Migratory

Page 16 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

SpeciesOrcinus orca
Killer whale, orca
Physeter macrocephalus
Sperm whale
Sousa chinensis
Indo-pacific humpback
dolphin
Tursiops aduncus(Arafura/Timor Sea
populations)
Spotted Bottlenose Dolphin(Arafura/Timor Sea
populations)
ReptilesCaretta caretta
Loggerhead turtle
Chelonia mydas
Green turtle
Crocodylus porosus
Estuarine crocodile, salt-water
crocodile
Dermochelys coriacea
Leathery turtle, leatherback
turtle, luth
Eretmochelys imbricata
Hawksbill turtle
Natator depressus
Flatback turtle
SharksRhincodon typus
Whale shark

StatusMigratory
Migratory
Migratory

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Presence TypeSpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat likely
to occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Breeding known to occur
within area
Species or species habitat likely
to occur within area

Migratory
Migratory

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area
Species or species habitat may
occur within area

Migratory

MigratorySpecies or species habitat may
occur within area

Marine Areas
The Ichthys Field lies on the continental shelf in Commonwealth waters within Permit WA-285-P
with water depths ranging from 230 m to 280 m (refer to Figure 4). No ecological surveys relevant to
the development area have been published. Preliminary field surveys carried out by the proponent in
the vicinity of the Ichthys Field (September 2005) suggest the dominance of a barren sand seabed
prone to strong currents and mobile sediments. Benthic communities are sparsely distributed inshallower waters, depending upon seabed substrates which range from muds, rippled sands, low
semi-exposed pavements and upstanding reefal features. Soft substrates appear to support a low
diversity and sparse array of epi-benthic organisms, primarily small gorgonians, sponges, and tube
worms. Hard substrates support diverse assemblages which include small sea whips, sponges,
gorgonians, crinoids, and black corals. Infauna surveys identified 117 nominal species across ten
phyla of varying abundance. Infauna assemblages are characterised by polychaete worms (Annelida)and crustaceans (Arthropoda).
Regional features in the development area include Echuca Shoal and Browse Island. Echuca Shoal
is located approximately 70 km east of the proposed location of the CPF and is characterised by adiverse assemblage of corals including Porites, Faviids, and Acroporids. Soft corals include small
sea whips (Junceella) and members of the genera Dendronephthya, Sacrophton and Sinuloaria. All
taxa are common in tropical Western Australian reefal habitats. Browse Island (refer to Figure 2) isclassified a Class C Nature is located approximately 35 km from the proposed central processing
facilities. Browse Island is a sand and limestone cay situated on a limestone reef and coral reef andDocument No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 17 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

covers an area of 13 ha. The remnants of historical phosphate mining on the island have left asignificantly disturbed surface. The island represents an important turtle nesting site, particularly forthe green turtle (Chelonia mydas). Browse Island is the nearest land to the Ichthys Field(approximately 35 km). Through environmental studies, INPEX will demonstrate Browse
Island’s environmental values are not a risk from the development.

Figure 4: Bathymetric Map of WA-285-P Permit and Surrounding Area

There is little information available in regard to the near-shore marine environment of the Maret
Islands. Preliminary site investigations by INPEX (June 2004) show that near shore sea bed
conditions are characterised by scattered outcroppings of coral reefs with near surface conditions
dominated by sand. A number of rocky outcrops and near-surface reefs are located around the islands.
Extensive reef structures exist to the north and south west of the islands.
Table 2 and Table 3 provide a detailed list of threatened and migratory marine species that occur in theregion of the Maret Islands. While various marine mammals are known to occur broadly within theregion, the annual migration of the humpback whale is possibly the most significant. Figure 5 shows
the limited extent of information in regards to humpback whale activity in the development area. Thisdata gap will be addressed through cetacean surveys throughout the development region (refer toFigure 6).
The inshore waters and sandy beaches of the Kimberley Islands are considered important habitat forfive species of turtle listed in Table 2. The green turtle (Chelonia mydas), hawksbill turtle(Eretmochelys imbricate), flatback turtle (Natator depressus) and loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta)
are known to nest on beaches throughout the region. Preliminary investigations by INPEX (September2005) indicate the key turtle species present at the islands of interest is the hawksbill turtle.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 18 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Figure 5: Location and Estimated Period of Humpback Whale Activity in WA (Source: DoIR 2003)

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 19 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Figure 6: Cetacean Study Area

3.2 Provide a description of important features of the project area and the affected area and showthese on the attached map, including (if relevant to the project area or affected area)
information about:
Terrestrial Environment(a) soil and vegetation characteristics;
Preferred Development Site – Maret Islands
The geology of the Maret Islands is characterised by a lateritic cap averaging 15 m to 20 m thickness
over a basalt base. The laterite is undifferentiated with the upper 10 m weathered and hardened, andthe lower 5 to 10 m typically softer as evidenced by the eroding cliff faces. The basalt layer is a part of
the Kimberley Carson Volcanics and is grey green to black in an angular blocky formation.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 20 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

There is virtually no soil on North Maret Island and very little on South Maret Island. The surface ofboth islands is very rocky with broken laterite exposed at ground level. Interspersed between broken
laterite is massive unbroken laterite at the surface.
North Maret has large open spaces of spinifex hummock grassland with some pockets of woodland in
the centre (and wider) part of the island.
Observed flora species included the long fruited bloodwood (Corymbia polycarpa [previously
Eucalyptus polycarpa]. This tree is the dominant woodland species on the plateau and occurs inextensive stands along the central western side of the island.
Other species include: Grevillea pyramidalis, wattles (Acacia sp. [retinervis?]), Commelina ensifolia,
spinifex (Triodia sp.), Distichostemon hispidulus, tropical lily (Crinum flaccidum) naked lady
(Sarcostemma viminalis ssp. australe), Diospyros neritima, Gomphrena sp., Pandanus sp. (spiralis?)and spear grass (Heteropogon contortus). Cliff and beach vegetation are particularly abundant on thewestern side of the island, with extensive development of sand dunes. Species observed include:
lawyer vine (Flagellaria indica), Gomphrena sp., Pittosporum sp. (moluccanum?), coastal spinifex(Spinifex longifolius), beach morning glory (Ipomea pes-caprae ssp. braziliensis), Scaevola sp.,
Pouteria sericea and Ptilotus spicatus ssp. spicatus.
The plateau vegetation on South Maret Island appears significantly different to North Maret Island
only in terms of density and abundance. The vegetation features some small, isolated areas of open
hummock grassland, however the majority of the island is covered with thick woodland that in someareas (e.g. the north and west sides) could be regarded as closed forest. The canopy in these areas isapproximately 5 to 7 m high and the undergrowth extremely dense with vine thickets.
All the flora species listed above for North Maret were found on South Maret, in addition thefollowing were observed: Eucalyptus sp. (bella or miniata?) and Asparagus racemosus.
All species observed are widely abundant and commonly found throughout the Kimberley islands andmainland.
Alternative Development Site — Champagny Island
Champagny Island is an alternative development site located approximately 190 km from the Ichthys
Field, 30 km from the nearest mainland location and 365 km from Broome. The island covers an areaof 1 388 ha and lies in the Augustus Group of islands.
Champagny Island is characterised by hardened quartzitic Warton sandstone estimated to beapproximately 300m thick (Gellatly and Sofoulis 1973). There is a prominent joint pattern in the
Warton Sandstone that has led to some gullying at the surface which has eroded into blocky angularfeatures.
Substantial gullies and creek lines run parallel to each other across the island, generally in a northsouth direction. The north-eastern side of the island has significantly elevated topography relative tothe remainder of the island, with peaks reaching greater than 50 m.
There are substantial beaches on the eastern and south-eastern sides of the island and steep cliff faces
along the northern side of the island falling into the sea.
Preliminary aerial observations indicate the island is covered mainly with open scrub though a numberof dense stands of Eucalyptus (E. perfoliata) and Acacia (A. plectocarpa and A. tumida). The
understorey is dominated primarily by spear grass (Heterpogon contortus) and spinifex (Triodia sp.
and Spinifex longifolius). Mangrove species (Avicennia sp.?) exist in the sheltered silty creeks along
the southern side of the island.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 21 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document(b)

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

water flows, including rivers, creeks and impoundments;

There is no record of permanent water on the Maret Islands. Aerial photography suggests the presenceof a small number of minor ephemeral water drainage lines. The presence of groundwater is highly
unlikely given the volcanic/metamorphic characteristics of regional and island geology.
(c)the presence of outstanding natural features, including caves;

The Maret Islands have been allocated to a Landscape Protection area under the Shire of Wyndham –East Kimberley Local Planning Strategy. Both islands are characterised by a number of beach areas,
with the remaining coast featuring steep cliff faces. The majority of the cliff faces have undercut as aresult of erosion. Coastal cliffs up to 10 metres high occur in parts of the Maret Islands. There is norecord of caves, or development of subterranean cave structures, which would be unlikely given theislands basaltic–lateritic geology.
(d)gradient;

North and South Maret Islands are characterised by slight relief. North Maret Island is relatively flat incontrast to South Maret Island which provides more relief with a peak elevation of 45 m.
(e)any buildings or other infrastructure;

None.
(f)

any marine areas;

Refer to 3.1 for description of marine area.
(g)kinds of fauna in the area;

Preferred Development Site – North and South Maret Islands
The Project will require the removal of between 35% and 45% of the Maret Islands native
vegetation that would otherwise provide potential habitat for terrestrial fauna. It is anticipated that
there is no subterranean fauna present on the islands due to the volcanic–metamorphic
characteristics of regional and island geology.
There are no known native mammals or marsupials observed on the Maret Islands and literature
research of publicly available information has not revealed records of them being present.
Anecdotal information (e.g. from Western Australian Museum and CALM) support this finding.
The reptile fauna on the Maret islands is abundant and provides much of the food source for the larger
raptors and each other. Smaller lizards include species from the Gekkonidae (geckos), Agamidae(dragon lizards) and likely Scincidae (skinks) families. Unidentified species of sea snakes have been
observed around the reefs of North Maret Island. Of particular note was the abundant presence of
hawksbill turtle nests (Eretmochelys imbricata) on all the beaches of both islands.
Alternative Development Site – Champagny Island
The Project will require the removal of between 19% and 25% of Champagny Island’s native
vegetation that would otherwise potentially provide habitat for terrestrial fauna. It is anticipatedthat there is no subterranean fauna present on the islands due to the volcanic–metamorphic
characteristics of regional and island geology.
There are many birds recorded around the Augustus group of islands, all of which are anticipated to befound at Champagny Island. Burbidge and McKenzie (1978) report that the mammal Zyzomys

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 22 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

woodwardii (large rock rat) may have been sighted on Champagny Island, though the evidence was
not conclusive enough to positively identify the species. The large rock rat is common throughout thenorthern Kimberley and Northern Territory in similarly rocky environments (Watts & Aslin 1981).
There is evidence in the literature that bats and a broad range of reptiles may also occur onChampagny Island (Burbidge & McKenzie 1978).
Refer to 3.1 for description of marine fauna.
(h)the current state of the environment in the area, including information about the extent oferosion, whether the area is infested with weeds or feral animals and whether the area is coveredby native vegetation or crops;

The rugged and remote environment of the Maret Islands combined with very limited non-aboriginalhuman contact suggests the environment is largely undisturbed from its natural state. INPEX believes
that no evidence exists indicating the presence of non-native species of plants or animals on Maret
Islands.
(i)known Indigenous heritage values;

Preferred Development Site – North and South Maret Islands
There is only one known Aboriginal Heritage site listed on the Department of Indigenous Affairs
register for South Maret Island. Details of this listed site are provided in Table 4.
Table 4: Maret Islands Registered Aboriginal Sites

Site Number
Name

K00132South Maret Island

Site TypeMan made structure

Reliability

Reliable

Location

South Maret Island E714136 – N8402311

Restriction

Not Restricted

Alternative Development Site – Champagny Island
There are two known Aboriginal Heritage sites listed on the Department of Indigenous Affairs register
for Champagny Island. Details of these listed sites are provided in Table 5.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 23 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Table 5: Champagny Island Registered Aboriginal Sites
Site Number

K00179Name

Champagny Islands

Site Type

Painting, man made structure

Reliability

Unreliable

Location

E635137 – N8305161

Restriction

Not Restricted

Site Number

K00180Name

Champagny Island

Site TypeMan made structure

Reliability

Unreliable

Location

E636637 – N8308661

Restriction

Not Restricted

Aboriginal heritage surveys will be conducted on both Champagny and the Maret Islands toensure compliance with the Western Australian Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 and respect thewishes of the relevant Traditional Owners.
(j)any other characteristics or important features of the receiving environment if the action is by aCommonwealth agency or may affect Commonwealth land.

None that are known nor foreseen.

3.3 What is the tenure of the project area (for example is it freehold, leasehold or some othertenure)? If practicable, show on the attached map.
Preferred Development Site – Maret Islands
The Maret Islands are classified as vacant crown land and are subject to a Native Title Claim
WC99/35 and Federal Court file number W6033/99. The proposal would require negotiation of
Native Title agreement with the Uunguu claimants. The Department for Planning andInfrastructure will be approached for a licence under Section 91 of the Land Administration
Act 1997 to gain access to the Maret Islands for site investigations and studies
Alternative Development Site – Champagny Island
Champagny Island is classified Aboriginal Reserve land and is part of the Kunmunya Aboriginal
Reserve administered by the Western Australian Aboriginal Affairs Planning Authority. The island isincluded in the Dambimangari native title claim. The claim was lodged with the National Native Title
Tribunal (NNTT) in 1995 and was formally registered in 1999. The Federal Court has referred theDambimangari claim to the NNTT for mediation, although only limited mediation has occurred todate. Access to Champagny Island for site investigations and studies will be coordinatedthrough the Kimberley Land Council.
Depending on the results of detailed site selection studies, INPEX may consider a third location if theChampagny or the Maret Islands prove unsuitable.
Ichthys Field

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 24 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

The exploration permit WA 285-P lies solely within Commonwealth waters. INPEX is the operator
and 100% equity holder of this permit. At the appropriate time in the development schedule, a portionof WA 285-P will be subject to acquisition of a production licence and will convert to a productionarea.
3.4 What are the current and/or proposed land uses for the project area?
Marine Areas
The Ichthys Field and surrounding waters are utilised by the Royal Australian Navy, Australian andIndonesian fishing operations, commercial shipping operations and other petroleum development
enterprises.
Preferred Development Site
Both North and South Maret Islands are currently uninhabited with no commercial, industrial orresidential developments ever having been constructed upon them.
Alternative Development Site
Champagny Island is an Aboriginal Reserve.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 25 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

4. Nature and extent of the likely impacts of the action
4.1 Describe, as relevant to your project, the nature and extent of likely impacts on the following
matters of national environmental significance protected by the EPBC Act:(a) the world heritage values of a declared World Heritage property; or(b) the heritage values of a listed National Heritage place; or(c) the ecological character of a declared Ramsar wetland; or(d) the members of a listed threatened species (except a conservation-dependent species) or any
threatened ecological community, or their habitat, or(e) the members of a listed migratory species or their habitat; or(f) the environment in part of the Commonwealth marine area.
On the basis of information sourced from the Protected Matters Search Tool (Table 1) the proposal
will have no impact on the following Matters of National Environmental Significance:• World Heritage Properties• National Heritage Places• Wetlands of International Significance• Threatened Ecological Communities
None of the matters listed above exist within the development area or within proximity to the area that
could be affected by the proposed development.
Disturbance to native vegetation on the development site will be minimised as far as practicable. The
total area required to be cleared for onshore development is estimated at between 260 ha and 340 ha,
or 35% and 45% of the total area of the Maret Islands. If the Project were to occur on ChampagnyIsland, it is estimated that the clearing of 260 ha to 340 ha, or 19% to 25% of the total area ofChampagny Island would be required.
Fifteen (15) threatened species and thirty (30) migratory species may occur in the development area
(refer to Table 2 and Table 3 respectively). Surveys for the presence of cetaceans, particularly
humpback whales, will be designed and executed in accordance with Australian National Guidelines
for Whale and Dolphin Watching (DEH 2005) to determine presence and activity, if any, in thedevelopment area. In the event cetaceans are detected in the area, strategies will be implemented tomitigate any potential impact. The location of the pipeline shore crossing is yet to be determined, butwill be located and constructed in a manner that will have minimal impact on turtle nesting habitat andactivities. This will be achieved through scheduling activities to avoid the nesting season, and tominimise light spill to nesting beaches. Construction of marine infrastructure including the jetty,
tanker channel, and materials offloading facility will also be carried out in a manner designed tominimise impacts to turtle nesting areas and marine habitat. Operational impacts on whales and turtles
are expected to be negligible and approved Environmental Management Plans will be in place prior to
any development activities commencing.
The proposed action will be undertaken in part in a Commonwealth marine area. Activities within thisarea will be typical of offshore petroleum production operations, including:•
Drilling and operation of numerous subsea wells, manifolds and risers tied back to an
offshore facility•
Installation and operation of an offshore facility•
Construction and operation of a subsea pipeline of approximately 200 km in length.
Drill cuttings and discharges can have adverse impacts on local water quality, pelagic and benthic
communities. The proponent will manage all drill cuttings and discharges, in accordance with theguidelines for Drilling Fluids Management (DoIR 1998).

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 26 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Construction of the subsea export pipeline will be conducted in accordance with an approved Pipeline
Management Plan which will include minimising disturbance to cetaceans and migratory species andunnecessary disturbance to marine habitat.
Commissioning and operational impacts will be managed through a risk-based approach in accordancewith legislated regulations and industry standards. Discharges, including hydrotest water and produced
formation water will be managed through an Environmental Plan in accordance with relevant
legislation.

Decommissioning will require an assessment of the best available option at the time facilities
are decommissioned. This will take into account relevant safety, environmental and economic
issues in order to produce a practical outcome that makes the best use of technology available
at that time. A decommissioning concept will be developed during the environmental studies.
4.2 Describe, as relevant to your project, the nature and extent of likely impacts on theenvironment for the following category of proposed actions (in addition to the specific mattersaddressed above in 4.1):(a)a nuclear action; or
The proposed action is not a nuclear action.
(b)

an action by the Commonwealth or by a Commonwealth agency; or

The proposed action will not be undertaken by the Commonwealth or by a Commonwealth agency.
(c)an action that will be taken on Commonwealth land or that may affect Commonwealth land; or

The proposed action will not be undertaken on Commonwealth land or that may affect Commonwealth
land.
(d)

an action taken by the Commonwealth or by a Commonwealth agency that may affect a listed
Commonwealth Heritage place or a place listed on the Register of the National Estate.

The proposed action will not affect a listed Commonwealth Heritage place or a place listed on theRegister of the National Estate.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 27 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

5. Measures aimed at avoiding or reducing significant impacts on
matters protected under the EPBC Act
5.1 Describe any specific measures proposed as part of the action to avoid or lessen significant
impacts on matters protected under the EPBC Act. Include a timeframe or workplan for
implementation of any relevant measures.
Examples of relevant measures may include the timing of works to avoid critical periods for listed
species, avoidance of habitat important for listed species from direct and indirect impacts,
application of specific design measures to avoid or reduce impacts, or adoption of specific work
practices to reduce or avoid impacts (see Referral Guide, Fact Sheet and ‘Particular Manner’
Guideline at http://www.deh.gov.au/epbc).

Described above in Sections 3 and 4.1 respectively.
5.2 Describe any consultations undertaken with Indigenous stakeholders regarding the action, if
relevant. Identify relevant stakeholders and the status of consultations at the time of referral.
Consultations with the Kimberley Land Council (representing the Dambimangari and Uunguu native
title claimants) have taken place in regard to gaining access to various offshore islands in the
Kimberley region. Ongoing consultation will be undertaken with the Kimberley Land Council andTraditional Owners during the assessment phase of this proposal and over the life of the project.

6. Information sources
6.1 List relevant references
You should also attach a copy of any relevant reports or documents that support the arguments andconclusions made in this referral. For example, any flora and fauna surveys or desktop
investigations should be provided.

6.2 For information given in sections 3 and 4 of this referral, please indicate:(a) the source of the information; and(b) how recent the information is; and(c) how the reliability of the information was tested; and(d) any uncertainties in the information.

Burbidge, A., N., McKenzie, and K. Kenneally 1991. Nature Conservation Reserves in the KimberleyWestern Australia. Department of Conservation and Land Management,
Western Australia.
Burbidge, A.A. and N. L. McKenzie 1978. The Islands of the North-West Kimberley, Western
Australia. Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife, Perth, W.A.
Bureau of Meteorology 2006. Accessed 23/01/06 <http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/>.
DEH 2005. Australian National Guidelines for Whale and Dolphin Observation. Department of theEnvironment and Heritage, Canberra, Australia.

DEH 2006.EPBC Search Tool, accessed 4th April 2006
<http://www.deh.gov.au/erin/ert/epbc/index.html />Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 28 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

DoIR 1998. Drilling Fluids Management. Western Australian Department of Industry and Resources,
Perth, Western Australia.
DoIR 2003. Location and Estimated Period of Humpback Whale Activity in Western Australia.
Western Australian Department of Industry and Resources, Perth, Western
Australia.
Gellatly, D.C. & Sofoulis, J. 1973. Yampi, W.A. 1:250,000 Geological Series – Explanatory Notes
Sheet SE/51-3. Australian Geological Survey, Canberra, A.C.T.
Watts, C.H.S. & Aslin, H.J. 1981. The Rodents of Australia. Angus & Robertson, Sydney.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 29 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Fill in Section 7.4 if you believe that the proposal is not likely to have a significant impact onmatters protected by the EPBC Act and that the proposal is therefore not a controlled action. Fill in
Section 7.5 if you believe that the proposal is likely to have a significant impact on a protected
matter and that the proposal is therefore a controlled action. (Note: This Section must be completed
in all cases except where the referral is made by a State or Territory or a Commonwealth agency inrelation to an action to be taken by another person.)

7.4. If you think your proposed action is not likely to have a significant impact on any of the matterslisted in the table below, then you should select and complete the following statement and you
should not mark any of the boxes in the table below.
I ……………………………………………….(full name), being the person making this referral andthe person proposing to take the action (or agent acting on behalf of the person) believe that the action
described in this referral is not a controlled action.
Briefly provide reasons why you believe your proposed action is not a controlled action:(Note: For an explanation of the term “controlled action”, see the Referral Guide.)OR
7.5. If you think that your proposed action is likely to have a significant impact on any of thematters listed in the table below, then you should select and complete the following statement. You
must then mark ‘Yes’ against those matters on which you think it will have a significant impact, inthe table below.
I, Sean Kildare, being the person making this referral and the person proposing to take the action (oragent acting on behalf of the person) believe that the action described in this referral is a controlled
action because of the following provisions of the Act:
Significant
ImpactLikelyNo

Controlling Provision

World Heritage property(Sections 12 and 15A - significant impacts on the values of aWorld Heritage property)

No

National Heritage places(Sections 15B and 15C – significant impacts on the values of a
National Heritage place)Ramsar Wetland

No

Yes

(Sections 16 and 17B - significant impacts on the ecologicalcharacter of a Ramsar wetland)
Threatened species or ecological communities(Section 18 and Section 18A - significant impacts on a listed
threatened species or a listed threatened ecological community)
Migratory species

Yes(Sections 20 and 20A - significant impacts on a listed
migratory species)

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 31 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

Significant
ImpactLikelyNo

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Controlling Provision

Nuclear action(Sections 21 and 22A - nuclear actions)

Yes

Commonwealth marine area
(Sections 23, 24 and 24A - actions relating to the
Commonwealth marine area and fishing in coastal waters
managed by the Commonwealth)Commonwealth land

No

No

(Sections 26 and 27A - actions relating to Commonwealthland)Commonwealth action(Section 28 - actions by the Commonwealth having asignificant impact on the environment)

Briefly provide reasons why you believe your proposed action is a controlled action:(Note: For an explanation of the term “controlled action”, see the Referral Guide.)

INPEX Browse Ltd believes that the proposed Ichthys Field Development will have no effect on
World Heritage Property, National Heritage Places, Ramsar Wetland or Commonwealth Land. The
proposed development is not likely to have significant impacts on threatened species or migratory
species. Given the development involves offshore facilities and a subsea pipeline in Commonwealthmarine waters, and given the large scale of development involved, the project should be subject toformal assessment under Commonwealth and Western Australian environmental impact assessment
processes. Formal assessment will utilise a proactive approach by the proponent to survey anddescribe the environmental values in the development region, and to develop appropriate management
approaches to mitigate risk to these values.
If the person making this referral is, or is representing, a small business ( a business having fewer than
20 employees), please provide an estimate of the time taken to complete this form.

Please Include• The time spent reading the instructions, working on the questions and obtaining the information;and• The time spent by all employees in collecting and providing this information.
hours
minutes
END OF FORM

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 32 of 33

Ichthys Field Development Commonwealth EPBC Act 1999 – Referral Document

INPEX Browse Ltd,
Revision 0

Appendix 1
EPBC Search Area April 06*

Point 1

14

Point 214degrees0

Point 313degrees45

Point 413

degrees45

Point 514degrees50

Point 614degrees

Point 7

15

Point 8

15

Point 914degrees15

minutes

south

125

degrees15

minuteseast

minutes

south

124

degrees30

minuteseast

minutes

south

124

degrees30

minuteseast

minutes

south

123

degrees0minuteseast

minutes

south

123

degrees0minuteseast

50

minutes

south

123

degrees45

minuteseast

degrees30

minutes

south

123

degrees45

minuteseast

degrees30

minutes

south

124

degrees32

minuteseast

degrees28

minutes

south

125

degrees15

minutes

east*Source: DEH 2006.

Document No. DEV-EXT-RP-0001
Dated: May 2006

Page 33 of 33