Design on Framework ofInteractive Territory Monitoring Report
Young-Joo Lee1, ChangWha Oh1†
1 Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, † Presenter

14 November 2018

Contents
Ⅰ. Overview
Ⅱ. Concept of Interactive Territory Monitoring Report
Ⅲ. How to make the Interactive Territory Monitoring Report
Ⅳ. [Demonstration] Report of Deteriorated Area and Urban Regeneration
Ⅴ. Conclusion Remarks

Ⅰ.
 Research Backgrounds
 Many countries have effort to realize data-based administration for preemptive
response on national current issues.
 Also, Many countries develop applications for data analysis and visualization andshare analysis results as tools for evidence-based policy-making.
 So, It is needed to explore national territorial policy issues and diagnosing statusof the issues based on spatial data.

 Research Objectives
 In response to territorial issues, make a concept of ‘interactive community’ thatcan share evidence-based policy and result of policy research by building
interactive territory monitoring reports.
3

Ⅱ.
 What is “Interactive Territory Monitoring Reports”?
 Interactive territory monitoring report is concept that contains territory issues
based on data diagnosis by using interactive map technologies, sharing
interactive maps / graphs / statistics, and sharing opinion and knowledge ofdiagnosis results.
 Find cooperative problem resolution by formation of public consensus ofpolicy research result.
 Create an environment where users can share and exchange opinions with
web-based interactive maps to explore interpretation of the results and policymaking.

4

Ⅲ.
 Components of Interactive Territory Monitoring Reports
 Basically, interactive territory monitoring reports should contain following details.

Datamanagement

Data
analysisDatavisualization

InteractiveMaps

Statistics /AttributesParticipation
andcommunication

Interactive
Graphs /Charts

PolicyStorytelling

Community
platform Following these details, this study made interactive territory monitoring reports forexample of detecting deteriorated area.
5Ⅲ.
 Building Process of Interactive Territory Monitoring Reports
PolicymakingFeedback

Discover policy issues

Enforcement

Planning data analysis

Data collect / process

Evaluation
andmonitoring

Data analysis / visualization
Knowledge
ExpertPoicy Executive

Configure and utilize
expert community

CitiesConvergence
Participation

CitizenNation-wide

Policy story making

Release the report

ExpertPolicy ExecutiveSharing analysis results
based on interactive map platform
Giving user-oriented explorative environments

Explore and makeopinion on region

Feedback collect / analyze
Communication

Make public by policy issues∙Communications based on data

Cooperative problem
resolution

6

reflection

Districts

Grids

[Demonstration]
Report of Deteriorated Areaand Urban Regeneration

Ⅳ.

8

Ⅳ.
 Policy Issue : Deteriorated Area and Urban Regeneration
 One of national task of Moon Jae-In Administration is “Urban regeneration ‘newdeal’ project for enhancing urban competitiveness and improving the quality of life”.
 And, government has effort to realize evidence-based policy-making by enacting alaw like “act on promoting data-based administration”.
 So, in response to this trend, this study produces interactive reports for analyzing
deteriorated area based on population/building statistics and suggesting policyimplications.

Urban
Regeneration

Evidence-based
Policy-making

9support

Ⅳ.
 Scenario(procedure) of Data Analysis

compare10

Ⅳ.
 Scenario of Data Analysis – data
 Data Resident registration demographics data of MOIS(Ministry of Interior andSafety)(2015, 2017)
 Building management data of MOLIT(Ministry of Land, Infrastructure andTransportation) architectural administration system(2017)
 Indicator Population : Aged population ratio, Population change ratio Building : Ratio of old buildings, Average building area
 Spatial / Temporal range

 Spatial range : South Korea
 Temporal range : 2015(for population change), 201711

Ⅳ.
 Grid-based Demographics

12Ⅳ.
 Grid-based Building Statistics13

Ⅳ.
 Grid-based population and building statistics

14

Ⅳ.
 1. Diagnose Population Declined Area15

Ⅳ.
 1. Diagnose Population Declined Area16

Ⅳ.
 1. Diagnose Population Declined Area17

Ⅳ.
 2. Diagnose Aged-Building Area18

Ⅳ.
 2. Diagnose Aged-Building Area19

Ⅳ.
 2. Diagnose Aged-Building Area

20

Ⅳ.
 Interactive Map 2: Diagnose Step (population/building)21

Ⅳ.
 3. Detecting Deteriorated Area based on Population and Building Overlapping two layers(population declined area and aged-building area) andextract final product.
 This result find distribution of deteriorated area, and it can be divided largely twopatterns.
 First, cluster in urban central region
 Second, sporadic distribution in rural region
 Grid which is lived more than 100 people occupy 15% of all grids and this 15%grids contains 83% people who lived in deteriorated area (mostly cluster in centralregion).
 And, most of the grids have high percentage of residential building ratio.
 So, we can get insight that issue of deteriorated area is severe in urban residentialarea.
22

Ⅳ.
 3. Detecting Deteriorated Area based on Population and Building23

Ⅳ.
 3. Detecting Deteriorated Area based on Population and Building24Ⅳ.
 3. Detecting Deteriorated Area based on Population and Building25

Ⅳ.
 Interactive Map 3: Detect Deteriorated Area26

Ⅳ.
 4. Urban Regeneration District with Diagnose Result27

Ⅳ.
 Interactive Map 4: Compare with Urban Regeneration Area28

Ⅳ.
 5. Interactive Community Platform for Sharing Opinion

Opinion!

29

Ⅴ.
“ Data-based communications for collaborative policy implementation ”

For this monitoring report, users can obtain reference
data about deteriorated area and support policy makingof urban regeneration.

User can register reply and opinion on monitoring report,
it can enhance participation and communication withcitizens.

30Thank You
KRIHS (http://eng.krihs.re.kr/)
Chang-Wha Oh(cwoh15th@krihs.re.kr)