Strengthening the National Research and Innovation Funding Agencies in West Africa (SRIFA)REPORT ON VALIDATION, CO-DEVELOPMENT AND CO-DESIGN OF TRAINING
PROGRAMME AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKSHOP IN NIGERIAEvent Dates: 25-26 March 2024
Prepared by:Prof. Nicholas Ozor
Executive Director, African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS),
and SRIFA Principal Investigator,
Chancery Building, 8th Floor, Valley Road,
P. O. Box 10081-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Email: executivedirector@atpsnet.org
Submitted to:
Dr. Matthew Wallace
Senior Program Specialist,
International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada.
mwallace@idrc.ca

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Justification
The Science Granting Councils Initiative (SGCI) in sub-Saharan Africa recognizes the critical role of national
agencies in charge of funding of research and innovation referred to as Science Granting Councils (SGCs). The
SGCs are responsible for driving research and innovation (R&I) for social and economic development. In West
Africa, efforts are underway to strengthen existing SGCs where they exist as well as to establish new ones
where they do not exist to bolster R&I capacities in the sub-region. With support from the SGCI, the African
Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) in partnership with the African University of Science andTechnology (AUST), is working to provide training and technical support to SGCs in Burkina Faso, Côte
d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sierra Leone. Preliminary studies conducted through desk reviews,
surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions have informed the development of draft reports
on each of the participating countries. With a 2-day validation and co-development workshop, the training needs
and technical support is refined and finalized for subsequent delivery of tailored training and technical support
to the Councils in the respective countries.
The landscape of R&I funding, policy, and practice is dynamic, requiring Councils or their equivalent in West
Africa to continuously evolve and build their capacities. Despite their dedication to R&I, these Councils or theirequivalents encounter challenges such as limited resources, policy inconsistencies, and knowledge gaps amongstaff. Existing training programmes often lack regional specificity and fail to address the unique needs of West
Africa. Worse still is that some countries in the sub-region are yet to establish a research and innovation funding
Council. Therefore, the proposed workshop aims to validate and refine training programme content by engaging
the Council staff or its equivalent in the participating countries in reviewing and providing feedback on
designed modules; prioritizing topics relevant to emerging R&I trends. Additionally, to build the capacity of theCouncils and/or establish a new Council where it does not exist, the workshop seeks to co-develop and tailor
technical support delivery approaches in collaboration with the relevant stakeholders; integrating innovative
methods such as blended learning and peer-to-peer exchange. It aims to foster ownership and commitment
among participants through active participation, open discussions, and shared decision-making, whiledeveloping strategies for long-term engagement and knowledge sharing. Furthermore, the workshop aims tostrengthen regional collaboration and partnerships by facilitating networking and communication between
Council representatives and identifying opportunities for joint research projects, policy initiatives, and resource
mobilization within the sub-region.

1.2 Goal of the Validation and Co-Development of Training Programme Workshop
The goal of the workshop was to validate the preliminary results on policy and institutional landscape,comprehensive stakeholder mapping and analysis, and needs assessment of the research and innovation funding
ecosystem in the participating countries and co-develop a tailor-made training and/or technical support
programme for each of the Councils/funding agencies. Specifically, the Workshop seeks to:a) Validate the content and structure of the training programme designed to strengthen Science Granting
Councils in West Africa.
b) Facilitate collaborative refinement and prioritization of needs in order to develop the training
programme through inputs from key stakeholders.
c) Foster knowledge exchange and peer learning among participants to enhance the effectiveness of
capacity-building efforts.

d) Generate actionable insights and recommendations to ensure the relevance and impact of the training
programme.
1.3 Methodology for the Workshop
The workshop was held physically and virtually for the benefit of those unable to join physically in Abuja,
Nigeria at the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund). The workshop involved two-day engagement sessions
with relevant stakeholders including ministries and agencies in research and innovation funding. The first day
involved presentation and the validation of results and prioritization of training needs and technical support
while the second day involved the co-development of training and technical support programmes with thestakeholders This 2-day workshop employed highly interactive and collaborative approaches. The project team
actively participated in the workshop led by the PI of the project Prof Nicholas Ozor, the Executive Director of
the African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS), Nairobi, Co-PI of the project Prof. Peter Onwualu(President of AUST) supported by the Project Officer, Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo. Other project team members
included Alfred Nyambane (Programme Manager, ATPS), Dr Joel Nwakaire (Team member, ATPS, Doreen
Ongoro (Finance and Admin Officer, ATPS), Wentland Muhatia (Team member (ATPS), and Susan Mburu,(Communication and Outreach Officer), Dr Prisca Onuoha, (Partner, AUST), Chukwuemeka Uwanaka (Partner,
AUST). The team reviewed and refined the reports through presentations, group discussions, and brainstorming
sessions. The focus was on co-developing training delivery methods and tools tailored to the Council’s preferredlearning styles, national, and regional contexts. The workshop was expected to foster ownership andcommitment by encouraging open dialogue, shared decision-making, and strategies for long-term engagement
as well as gender equality and social inclusion. Additionally, the networking opportunities are expected tofacilitate regional collaboration and knowledge exchange among SGCs and stakeholders, strengthening R&I
ecosystems across West Africa.
1.4 Expected Outputs and Outcomes of the Workshopa) Validated and refined training programme tailored to the needs of Science Granting Councils in West
Africa.
b) Enhanced collaboration and mutual learning among stakeholders involved in research and innovation
funding.
c) Actionable recommendations for the effective implementation and sustainability of the training
programme and technical support.
DAY 1: UNDERSTANDING POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL LANDSCAPE, COMPREHENSIVESTAKEHOLDER MAPPING OF THE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING ECOSYSTEM
The presentation of the report on the preliminary studies was followed by an open interrogation of the content
of the report with interactions and comments from the different stakeholders. These gave rise to identification ofsome very important policies and relevant institutions in the research and innovation funding landscape of
Nigeria. Upon reviewing the policy instruments in the presented document, the stakeholders emphasized thefollowing policies:▪

National Science, Technology & Innovation Policy (NSTP) 2012, 2022▪

National Science, Technology & Innovation Roadmap 2030 (2017)▪

National Economic Empowerment & Development Strategy (NEEDS, 2004)▪

Presidential Executive Order 005 (2018)▪

National Policy on Public Private Partnerships (2018)▪

National Agriculture Technology & Innovation Plan (2023-2025)▪

The Revised National Science, Technology and Innovation Policy (NSTP, 2022)

Upon discussions, emphasis was made of a Bill for the establishment of a national research fund which was on
the floor of the 9th Assembly and how to resuscitate it to ensure the establishment of the Council in Nigeria. It
was noted that the existing funding structure was sector-based, with various Ministries, Departments &Agencies (MDAs) funding research through research institutes. The existing governance structure wasestablished by NSTIP 2011, and it includes:▪

National Research & Innovation Council (NRIC)▪

Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation (FMSTI)▪

National Council on Science, Technology & Innovation (NCSTI)▪

State Science, Technology & Innovation Council (SSTIC)▪

Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund)▪

Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN)▪

Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF)▪

Nigerian Content Development & Monitoring Board (NCDMB)

The stakeholders identified TETFund, FMSTI, and FMAFS as top influencers and drivers of research funding.
They also identified the Ministry of Finance Incorporated (MOFI) which is the investment arm of the Ministry
to be a major player in the research and innovation funding in Nigeria. Stakeholders emphasized the need torevive the bill proposing a national research foundation, previously stalled in the 9th Assembly. Including theprivate sector from the outset of discussions regarding the Council's establishment was deemed crucial. A clear
and well-defined plan for funding sources is necessary to avoid conflicts of interest. The importance ofintellectual property (IP) security and commercialization strategies were also highlighted.
After this general discussion, participants went into a brainstorming session in their two different groups toprioritize the training needs and technical support as presented. The Working Group One presented a prioritizedtraining needs and technical support which was criticized and adopted by the general group as follows:
Priority Training Needs

Level ofPriority

Justifications

Financial Management

1stImportant in evaluating project proposals effectively,
assessing budgetary requirements accurately, and toallocate funds in a judicious manner.

Grant Management & Disbursement

2nd

Provides knowledge and skills needed to administer
grants effectively, including understanding grantrequirements, setting appropriate milestones, andmaintaining compliance with funding guidelines.

Financial Reporting

3rd

Ensures transparency and accountability as well ascompliance with regulations and standards.

Online Management of grant calls

4th

Ensures efficient grant call management and provides
for easier data management and control.

Research Management

5th

To equips stakeholders with the knowledge and skills
to critically assess the scientific merit, feasibility, andpotential impact of proposed research projects.

Commercialization of Research Output

6th

To enable staff to identify opportunities for translating
research findings into commercially viable products orservices, maximizing the return on investment andsocietal impact of funded projects.

The priority technical support and their justifications are presented in the table below:
Priority Technical Support

Level ofPriority

Justifications

STI

1st

Provide a framework for aligning research funding
priorities with broader societal, and economic goals

Stakeholder

2nd

Contribute to the decisions of policy makers and,for the development of evidence-based policies
that foster a conducive environment for researchand innovation

Advocacy for Increased R&I Funding

3rd

To help raise awareness among policymakers,
industry leaders, and the general public about thecritical importance of investing in research andinnovation.

Consultations with Parliamentarians

4th

Effective consultations can influence legislativedecisions that directly impact the operations,funding mechanisms, and the broader researchand innovation ecosystem.

Breakfast Meetings/Workshops

5th

To provide valuable opportunities for stakeholders
to network, build relationships, and foster
collaboration.

Preparation & Presentation of Seminal
Papers6th

It positions the funding agency as an thought
leaders in the research and innovation funding
space. It also helps in facilitating the dissemination

Development
DocumentsofHigh-Level Policy
Engagements

Strategic&

ofcutting-edge
perspectives.

research,

insights,

andDAY 2: CO-DEVELOPING TAILOR-MADE TRAINING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORTPROGRAMMESBased on the prioritized training needs and technical support, the two working groups were required to work on
the co-development of tailor-made training programme and technical support under the five pre-identified areas
namely: content, gender and social inclusion, challenges, solutions, and emerging issues. After a rigorous
brainstorming session, the Working Group One presented the outcome of their task on the development oftraining programme which was interrogated and adopted by the general group as follows:
Priority

Financial
Management

Content

Genderequality
andinclusion
strategies

Challenges

Solution

Training needs design Design
Education/research Multilateral
output segmented training,shouldhighlight should
adopt
into
sectors: stakeholder
collaboration
existing
polytechnics,
dialogue
betweenworking
research institutes,
manufacturers/private groups,
thishinders
sector,priority should
equitable
matrix, target setting, display
distribution;
and adoptions of earmarked address the gap inquota for adoption
forlocal content.
women in technical schools
research,and skills
training,
andexerciseshould besocially
inclusive.

Grant
DigitalManagement and management
Disbursement

Emerging
IssuesEmerging
and issue: Focus on
peculiarity in
Nigeria to steer
research
interest,
anduse of AI.

grant Gender
Irregular
Resultbased Community of
crossfinancing;
Monitoring,practice;
cutting
adoptionofevaluation,andadequate andapproaches
systemforlearning;
strategic
should beenhancing
Inadequate record adherence
adoptedto networking
keeping systems; timely monitoring,
delay in report evaluation
andlearning
submissions

Financial
Reporting

OnlineManagement
Draft Calls

Need for content Gender
Lack of adherence Digitalization
digitization:cross
to timely reportdevelopment of an cutting
submission; delayApp.;
Training strategies in implementation;
should cut across all should be poor bookkeeping;cadre of officers; adopted
irregular
bookkeeping
bookkeeping
techniques
Pre andof webinars

post-call Gender
Prone to hacks
cross
cutting
strategies
should be
adoptedResearch
Relevant training for Provision Inadequate
operators
and forManagement:
fundingbeneficiaries
Training
andspecialised
Capacity Building
training forpeople withdisabilities
andlanguagebarriers

Basicliteracy

An innovative
financial reportmechanism
shouldbe
adopted withadequate
training.

digital Transformative
digitaltechnology canpose a threat.

Crowdfunding

Continuous
training
andbench marking

Commercialization Prioritizationof Gender and Not
having a Training should continuousof
Research thematic
areas, social
clear/detail
be available for training
andOutputresearch should be inclusion
research pathway, pathway
to benchmarking
demanddriven; should be to know where commercialization
create incentives for recognized research starts andpatent owners
stops,
fromresearch to patent
to deployment tocommercialization
It was noted that from the outset research should be approached with commercialization, demand-driven andgender and social inclusion factored in. There should be training for the researchers and funders to drive theresearch and innovation funding agency. The training should focus on how to build linkages between
researchers and the private sector and sustaining relationships. Stakeholders requested technical support in thefollowing areas:
Priority

Content

Development Assess, simply andof Strategic
address overzealous

Gender equality
and inclusion
strategies

Challenges

Solution

Gender-sensitive
policy; Promote

Infrastructural Provide funding;
Deficit;
Advocacy;

Emerging
IssuesArtificial
Intelligence

STI
Documents
Such asPolicies andPolicyImplementati
on Strategy.

policies by policy
analysts, bring in
professionals;
Investment in R & D;
Promote publicawareness campaign

diversity/inclusion Language
Increase access for (AI); Climate
in leadership;barrier;
education forchange;Addressing Societal Administrative women;
Disruptive
Norms and Cultural bottlenecks
Development oftechnologies
Barriers/bureaucracy; innovation
Policyecosystem/
Fragmentation infrastructure hub(Science Parks,
Innovation Hubs)

High Level Identify all critical
Include thevulnerable andPolicyand stakeholders (The
Stakeholder triple helix; Academia, special needs
group; Ensure
Engagements Government &diverseIndustry,);
representation in
Development of soft
executive
skills (diplomacy,
leadershipanger management,
emotional intelligenceetc); The importanceof STI in national
development; Identify
the roles of different
stakeholders
Support on Having an audience,advocacy for public awareness;
Identification of R & I
increased
funding bodies
R&I funding(government, private
sector, international
collaborations;
Headline Benefits ofinnovation;
Development
advocacy documents

Getting thestakeholders
to be present;
Obtaininggovernment
buy -in; Timeframe forimplementation; Policy
somersault(change inmanagement)

Sustainability
Role ofstrategies fortechnology inpolicy regulation; effective
Strict adherence of engagement
policyofimplementation
stakeholders;
Spirit ofcollaboration
andpartnership

GenderCorruption;
Use of technology; Enhancing
mainstreaming and Lackof Proper data
National andsocial inclusiveness accountability management and international
in mappingby receiving reporting
collaboration
stakeholders.
bodies; Lacks.
ofsuccessstories; Lackof deploymentofresearchoutcomes

Consultations Consultation
with Gender
Accessingwith selected selected Parliamentary mainstreaming and Funding
parliamentari committeessocial inclusiveness committees
ans on R&I
in mapping
funding
stakeholders.

Strong lobbying
personalities

New media
andInfluencers

Breakfast
Identificationof Gender
Low activeroles; mainstreaming and participants ofmeetings/wor stakeholder
implementation of
kshopsto Technical Workshop
socially inclusive criticaladvocate forstrategies
in stakeholders;

Strongpolitical Useofbuy-inat the technology
highestlevel;
Strong stakeholder
collaborations

thedevelopmentofmechanisms
andinstitutionalframeworkforestablishing a
council

mapping
stakeholders

PromptImplementatio
n of theengagement
outcomes

Preparation
Presentation of papers Gender
Low active
Strong stakeholder Unethical use
that
addresstheissue
mainstreaming
and
of AI
and
participants of collaborationsofresearchandsocialinclusiveness(TETFundinpresentation
innovation fundinginmapping criticalcollaboration withofseminarstakeholders’
stakeholders.
FMSTI, ARCN,
papersoutcomes/outp etc)uts.

1. Conclusion
The stakeholders took an active time to review the report of the preliminary study, prioritized the training needand technical support areas and participated in the co-development and co-design of the training programme andtechnical support to the establishment of A research and innovation funding Council in Nigeria. Stakeholders
suggested the need for more public awareness to create insight into the importance of establishing the Council.
They emphasized the need for inclusivity, noting the need for women, and persons with disability or persons
with special needs and the marginalized group to make up at least 5% of the trainees. The funding agencies
should target and train persons who have practical knowledge but are not educated on how to access it. Theysuggested that the training should commence in May/June 2024.
In providing technical support, the participants agreed to visit South Africa and/or Uganda for thebenchmarking/learning as they have a very good and functional National Research Fund (NRF). There is also
the need for training and re-training, advocacy and sensitization, formation of a community of practice to help
sustain the outcome of training and technical support. The training process should include the measurement ofsustainability, each training should be measured in terms of success so that as the training progresses some bestpractices can be adopted. ATPS should send the reports and policy briefs emanating from the workshop to all
the major stakeholders. It will also be on ATPS and AUST websites and newsletters.
Stakeholders noted the benefits of joining the SGC and pointed out the critical role of TETFund. The efforts of
TETFunds in the establishment of a National Research Fund under the Federal Ministry of Innovation, Scienceand Technology (FMIST) were acknowledged. The Director of TETFund noted that it will relinquish all that isrequired for the new research and innovation funding Council in Nigeria. The need for TETFund to move fasterto establish the Council or National Research Foundation was emphasized. The ATPS promised that in a few

months from now, there will be a high-level policy dialogue which is expected to be major concrete step thatwill foster establishment of the Council.

A Group photograph of participants during SRIFA validation workshop in Nigeria

Workshop Programme
Day 1: Understanding the Research and Innovation Funding Landscape

25th March 2024

Morning Session: Opening and Overview
9:00 - 9:30

Registration

Susan Mburu

9:30 – 9:40

Welcome Remarks.

Prof. Michael Madukwe

9:40 – 9:45

Introduction of participantsALL

9:45 -10:00

Opening Remarks.

Dr Suleiman Zangina

10:00-10:20

Introduction to Workshop Objectives and Expected

Prof. Nicholas Ozor

Outcomes.
10:20 - 10:30

Group photograph

10:30 – 11:00

ALL
Tea BreakSession 1: Presentation of Preliminary Results
11:00 – 11:45

Presentation of Nigeria report

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

11:45 – 12:45

Interactive Q&A Session.

Alfred Nyambane

12:45 – 2:00

Lunch BreakAfternoon Session: In-depth Stakeholder Engagement

2:00 – 3:30

3:30 – 4:00

Breakout Sessions: Stakeholder Group Discussions on

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo/Alfred

Prioritization of Training Needs and Technical Support.

Nyambane/Wentland

Group Presentations on Identified Challenges andOpportunities.

4:00 – 4:30

Plenary Discussion: Key Themes Emerging from
Stakeholder Engagements.

4.30 – 6.00

Networking Session

Muhatiah26th March 2024

Day 2: Co-Developing Tailor-Made Programs
Morning Session: Recap and Objective Setting
9:00 - 9:30

Registration

Susan Mburu

9:30 – 9:45

Recap and review of Day 1.

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

9:45 -10:30

Introduction to Co-development Process.

Alfred Nyambane

10:30 – 11:00

Tea BreakSession 2: Co-Development Workshops

11:00 – 11:40

Workshop 1: Designing Tailor-Made Training Programs.

ALL

11:40 – 12:20

Workshop 2: Identifying Technical Support Needs.

ALL

12:20 – 1:00

Cross-Group Discussions and Insights Sharing.

ALL

1.00 – 2.00

LunchbreakAfternoon Session: Implementation Planning

2:00 -2:30

Presentation of Co-Developed Program.

Council Representative

2:30 – 3:30

Feedback and Iterative Refinement.

ALL

3:30 – 4:15

Roadmap for Implementation: Timelines and

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

Responsibilities.
4:15 – 4:30

Closing Remarks and Next Steps.

Prof. Peter Onwualu

List of Participant
S/N

Name

Sex

Name Of Institution &Address

Position/Designat Email
ion

Phone

1.

Arch Sonny Ochono

M

Tertiary Education TrustFund (TETFund)

Executive
Secretary (ES)ochonosto@y 08033062641
ahoo.com

2.

Dr. Girei Bakare

M

Tertiary Education TrustFund (TETFund)(Director
Research)sgbakari@ya 0809091089
hoo.co.uk

3.

Hadiza Ismail

M

Tertiary Education TrustFund (TETFund)

Deputy Director

hadiza71@g
mail.com

4.

Prof Garba Hamidu
Sharubutu mni

MAgricultural Research
Executive
Council of Nigeria (ARCN) Secretary

5.

Dr Nnemeka Edith
Ihegwuagu

F

Agricultural Research
Assistant Director/ nneihegwuag 08036490205
Council of Nigeria (ARCN) Agrochemist,
u@gmail.co
Country Focalm,
Point foredithnnemeka
IFPRI-CORAF-A @gmail.com
STI.

6.

Dr Suleiman Zangina

7.

Mr. Agoro Olayiwola

8.

Dr. Victor Fadipe,08037874170

gsharubutu@ 08036444451
gmail.com

Tertiary Education TrustFund (TETFund)

Deputy Director

suleimanzang 07086285822
ina@gmail.comM

Federal Ministry of
Science, Technology andInnovation

Deputy Director

layiagoro@hotmail.com

M

Federal Ministry of
Science, Technology andInnovation

Deputy Director

vobfadipe@g 09053351950
mail.com

08034526695

9.

Prof Deboral Odejimi F

Dean, School of PG
School, Igbenedion
University Okada

Dean PG

drodejimi@g 08053311615
mail.com

10.

Prof Magnus Chidi
OnuphaM

WAGEDI

11.

Chukwuemeka
Uwanaka

M

AUST

12.

Mrs. Hajara MYahaya F
Tanko

Raw Materials Researchand Development Council(RMRDC)

13.

Michael Mozie

M

AUST

14.

Prof. (Mrs.) Ekanem
BraideF

Academy of Science
University of Lagos

15.

Solomon Ibrahim

M

AUST

08165400006

16.

Adetunde O

M

FCDO

08128108643

17.

Mrs. Cynthia Ene
OgbeF

Eco Diversified Global
Services Ltd

MD

18.

Mr. Jude Adejuwon

M

CoCreation hUB

Team Lead Higher jude@cchub. 09017036316
Education Practice africa

19.

Grace Obidike

F

The Nations Newspaper,
Plot 5, Nanka Complex,
Wuse Zone 3, Abuja

Science andTechnology
Correspondence

chidimagnus@gmail,com+2349031725
769
Former Director

htanko@gmai 08099329444
l.com

mmozie@@a 08103827498
ust.edu.ng
President, Nigeria ekanembraide 08033416842
Academy of@hotmail.co
Science (NAS)m(Lagos)ecodiversifie
d@gmail.com08032442878

granovia@ya 08068277828
hoo.co.uk

20.

Prof Mosto Onuoha

M

21.

Prof. Peter Onwualu

M

Dr Prisca Onuoha

F

AUST

Mr. John Obekpa

M

RMRDC

Director:
Industrial
Research
Coordination
Department

johnobekpa@ +2348037413
gmail.com
492

24. Mr. Orji Nnaemeka
ChinaluM

Deputy Director

National Office
for Technology
Acquisition andPromotion(NOTAP)emkarj@gma +2340809800
il.com1988

National Coordinator ATPS
Nigeria25.

Prof Michael
MadukweM

26.

Prof Nicholas Ozor

M

27.

Alfred Nyambane

M

28.

Dr Cynthia Nwobodo

29.

Past President, Nigerian
Academy of Science

University of
Nigeria, Nsukka

mosto.onuoha +2348037793@gmail.com 601
aonwualu@a +2348037432
ust.edu.ng
497

AUST

madukwemic +2340803700
hael@yahoo. 6968
com
ATPS

nozor@atpsn
et.org

Programme OfficeATPS

anyambane@
atpsnet.org

F

Project OfficeATPS

cnwobodo@atpsnet.org

Dr Joel Nwakaire

M

Project Office

ATPS

jnwakaire@at
psnet.org

30.

Wentland Muhatia

M

Research Officer

ATPS

wmuhatiah@
atpsnet.org

31.

Susan Mburu

F

Communication OfficeATPS

smburu@atps
net.org

32.

Doreen Ongoro

F

Finance and Admin Officer ATPS

dongoro@atp
snet.org

Executive Director