Strengthening the National Research and Innovation Funding Agencies in West Africa (SRIFA)REPORT ON VALIDATION, CO-DEVELOPMENT AND CO-DESIGN OF TRAINING
PROGRAMME AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKSHOP IN SENEGAL
Event Dates: 12-13 March 2024
Prepared by:Prof. Nicholas Ozor
Executive Director, African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS),
and SRIFA Principal Investigator,
Chancery Building, 8th Floor, Valley Road,
P. O. Box 10081-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Email: executivedirector@atpsnet.org
Submitted to:
Dr. Matthew Wallace
Senior Program Specialist,
International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada.
mwallace@idrc.ca

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Justification
The Science Granting Councils Initiative (SGCI) in sub-Saharan Africa recognizes the critical role of Science
Granting Councils (SGCs) in driving research and innovation (R&I) for social and economic development. In
West Africa, efforts are underway to strengthen existing SGCs and establish new ones to bolster regional R&I
capacities. Partnering with the African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) and the African Universityof Science and Technology (AUST), the SGCI aims to provide training and technical support to SGCs in
Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sierra Leone. Preliminary studies conducted throughdesk reviews, surveys, interviews, and focus groups have informed the development of draft reports for eachparticipating country, with inputs sought from respective SGCs. A proposed 2-day validation andco-development workshop will refine and finalize a training program tailored to the needs of SGC staff,
facilitating their capacity-building efforts and accelerating regional R&I progress.
The landscape of R&I funding, policy, and practice is dynamic, requiring Councils or their equivalent in West
Africa to continuously adapt and build their capacities. Despite their dedication to R&I, these Councils or theirequivalent encounter challenges such as limited resources, policy inconsistencies, and knowledge gaps amongstaff. Existing training programs often lack regional specificity and fail to address the unique needs of West
Africa. Worse still is the fact that the Councils in some of the countries have not formally been established.
Therefore, the proposed workshop aims to validate and refine training program content by engaging the Council
staff or equivalent (in countries that do not have formal Councils) in reviewing and providing feedback on
designed modules, prioritizing topics relevant to emerging R&I trends and specific West African contexts.
Additionally, the workshop seeks to co-develop and tailor training delivery approaches in collaboration with theCouncils and stakeholders, integrating innovative methods like blended learning and peer-to-peer exchange. It
aims to foster ownership and commitment among participants through active participation, open discussions,and shared decision-making, while also developing strategies for long-term engagement and knowledge sharing.
Furthermore, the workshop aims to strengthen regional collaboration and partnerships by facilitating networking
and communication between Council representatives and identifying opportunities for joint research projects,
policy initiatives, and resource mobilization within the region.
1.2 Goal of the Validation and Co-Development of Training Programme Workshop
The goal of the workshop was to validate the preliminary results on policy and institutional landscape,comprehensive stakeholder mapping and analysis, and needs assessment of the research and innovation funding
ecosystem in the participating countries and co-develop a tailor-made training and/or technical support
programme for each of the Councils/funding agencies. Specifically, the Workshop seeks to:● Validate the content and structure of the training programme designed to strengthen Science Granting
Councils in West Africa.
● Facilitate collaborative refinement and prioritization of needs in order to develop the training
programme through inputs from key stakeholders.
● Foster knowledge exchange and peer learning among participants to enhance the effectiveness of
capacity-building efforts.
● Generate actionable insights and recommendations to ensure the relevance and impact of the training
programme.

1.3 Methodology for the Workshop
The workshop was held physically and virtually for the benefit of those unable to join physically in Dakar,
Senegal at Good Rade Hotel. The project team actively participated in the workshop led by the Co-PI of the
project Prof. Peter Onwualu, President of AUST supported by the Project Officer, Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo. Other
project team members present included Alfred Nyambane (Programme Manager, ATPS) and Susan Mburu(Communication and Outreach Officer, ATPS). The team reviewed and refined the reports throughpresentations, group discussions, and brainstorming sessions. The workshop involved a two-day engagement
session with the Councils and other relevant stakeholders including ministries and agencies in research andinnovation funding. The first day involved presentation and the validation of results and prioritization oftraining needs and technical support while the second day involved the co-development of training and technicalsupport programmes with the Councils. This 2-day workshop employed highly interactive and collaborative
approaches.. The focus was on co-developing training delivery methods and tools tailored to the councils’
preferred learning styles, national, and regional contexts. The workshop was expected to foster ownership andcommitment by encouraging open dialogue, shared decision-making, and strategies for long-term engagement.
Additionally, the networking opportunities are expected to facilitate regional collaboration and knowledge
exchange among SGCs and stakeholders, strengthening R&I ecosystems across West Africa.
1.4 Expected Outputs and Outcomes of the workshop●●●

Validated and refined training programme tailored to the needs of Science Granting Councils in West
Africa.
Enhanced collaboration and mutual learning among stakeholders involved in research and innovation
capacity building.
Actionable recommendations for the effective implementation and sustainability of the training
initiative.

DAY 1: UNDERSTANDING THE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING LANDSCAPE
2.1 Opening remarks
The workshop started with introductions of the participants. They provided their designations and theinstitutions they represent. The session was moderated by Prof. Cheikhou Kane, the ATPS National Chapter
Coordinator for Senegal. He was assisted by Dr. Dia Tine Seikhou, the head of the Council for Senegal.
Opening remarks were provided by Prof. Cheikhou. He highlighted the importance of the workshop and what
Senegal is set to accomplish. He welcomed the Head of the Council Dr Dia Tine who welcomed the project
team led by the Co-principal investigator Prof. Peter Onwualu, the acting president of African University of
Science and Technology (AUST). The ATPS was represented by the Project Officer, Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo, the
ATPS Programme Manager, Alfred Nyambane and the ATPS communication and Outreach Officer, Susan
Mburu.
Providing her opening remarks, Dr. Dia Tine appreciated the effort made by the Science Granting Council
Initiative (SGCI) through the SRIFA project to support councils to be more effective in their service delivery in
the research and innovation funding ecosystem. She urged the participants to participate effectively anddiligently in the workshop to ensure that they provide all the feedback needed.
2.2 Workshop objectives and presentation of the findings
The workshop objectives were presented to the participants by the Co-PI, Prof. Onwualu on behalf of the
project team. These are as provided in section 1.2 of this report. Dr. Cynthia then presented the findings of thestudy to the participants which highlighted the key policies around research and innovation funding,Institutional Framework of Research and Innovation Funding, Needs Assessment, Training needs and theTechnical Support required by the Council.
2.2.1 National Policies for Research and Innovation Funding
The government is currently developing an STI policy expected to be completed in 2023, which will enhancealignment with national goals, stakeholder involvement, and evidence-based approaches to foster economic andsocial development. The country does have some STI related policies and strategies for instance the National
Science, Technology, and Innovation Strategy (NSTIS), but this document is not a formal STI policy. The
NSTIS is a framework for STI development, but it does not set out specific goals or objectives, nor does it
provide a roadmap for implementation.
The Plan for an Emerging Senegal (PSE), (2015-2035): It was launched in 2015 and it sets out the
government's vision for the country's development. The PSE identifies research and innovation as a key priority
for Senegal's development. It states that "research and innovation are essential for Senegal's economic andsocial transformation."
The National Science, Technology, and Innovation Strategy (NSTIS): The NSTIS was adopted by the
Senegalese government in 2017. It is a ten-year strategy aimed at promoting science, technology, andinnovation as economic and social development drivers. The NSTIS encompasses a broader range of topics thanthe SNRST, including: Creating a scientific and innovation culture in the educational system; Assisting in thegrowth of science and technology-based firms; Investing in science and technology infrastructure, such as
research laboratories and technology parks; Creating policies that promote science, technology, and innovation;and International collaboration entails forming alliances with other countries and organizations in order to boost
research, technology, and innovation.
The National Strategy for Scientific and Technical Research (SNRST), adopted in 2014, is the main policy
document that defines the vision, objectives, priorities and instruments for research and innovation in Senegal.
It aims to promote a national research system that is responsive to the needs of the society and the economy, andthat contributes to the achievement of the national development plan (Plan Senegal Emergent) and theSustainable Development Goals.
Senegal Sectoral Policy Letter for the Development of Higher Education, Research, and Innovation (LPSD):
The LSPD is a document that defines the government's vision for the country's future higher education,
research, and innovation. The LSPD establishes an array of objectives for higher education, research, andinnovation in Senegal, such as improving the quality and relevance of higher education, encouraging researchand innovation, expanding the number of researchers, and fostering international cooperation.
Plan d'Actions pour la Formulation de la Stratégie Economique et Sociale (PAFES): is a national
development plan for Senegal that was launched in 2013. It aims to achieve an average annual growth rate of
7%, to reduce poverty by 50%, to create 500,000 new jobs, to improve access to education and healthcare, andto promote sustainable development. The plan is based on three pillars: economic transformation, social
development, and good governance.
2.2.2 National Institutional Framework for Research and Innovation Funding
The following are some of the key institutions involved in the National Institutional Framework for Researchand Innovation Funding in Senegal:

●

●

●
●
●
●

Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Innovation (MESRI): MESRI is the lead government agency
for research and innovation in Senegal. MESRI is responsible for developing and implementing national
research and innovation policies and strategies. MESRI through the General Directorate of Research andInnovation (DGRI) also provides direct funding to research institutions, as well as through competitive
grants programs.
National Agency for Research and Innovation (ANRI): ANRI is a public agency that is responsible forpromoting and coordinating research and innovation in Senegal. ANRI provides funding for research
projects, as well as support for researchers and innovators.
National Innovation Fund (FNI): FNI is a public-private partnership fund that provides funding forearly-stage technology startups. FNI is managed by the Senegalese Investment Fund (FONSIS).
Senegalese Foundation for Scientific Research (FSRS): This foundation supports scientific research andinnovation activities, including funding and grants for researchers and innovators.
National Institute of Pedagogical Studies and Research (INSEPS): INSEPS is focused on educational
research and curriculum development.
International donors: International donors, such as the World Bank, the African Development Bank, andthe European Union, provide significant funding for research and innovation in Senegal. International
donors often support specific research programs or projects, aligned with their own development priorities.

The National Institutional Framework for Research and Innovation Funding in Senegal is still evolving, andthere is a need to strengthen coordination and collaboration between the different actors involved. However, theframework has made significant progress in recent years, and is now supporting a growing number of researchand innovation projects and initiatives.
2.2.4 Training needs for National Research and Innovation Funding Agency in Senegal
The Senegalese Council and stakeholders identified key training needs that can lead to the efficient delivery ofservices in the research and innovation funding ecosystem in Senegal. These are summarized and ranked in thetable below. The table lists the training needs to strengthen the Council, ranked by priority. The top three areas
identified are: 1) Fundraising and grantsmanship, ranking 1st, indicating a critical need for skills in securing
funds and managing grants; 2) Online management of grant calls, ranked 2nd, highlighting the importance ofdigital proficiency in coordinating grant processes; and 3) Public-private partnership development, ranked 3rd,underscoring the significance of expertise in fostering collaborations between the public and private sectors.
Other notable areas include capacity building on gender-responsive data collection (4th), strengthening the roleof national intermediaries (5th), and grants management and disbursements (6th). The rankings extend to 18th
place, covering a range of topics from effective communication of research results to policymaking processes.
This prioritized list offers insights into the specific training needs perceived as crucial for enhancing theCouncil's capabilities.
Training needs to strengthen the Council

PrioritisationFundraising and grantsmanship

1stOnline management of grant calls

2nd

Public-private partnership development

3rd

Capacity building on gender-responsive data collection, management, reporting, andarchiving

4th

How to strengthen the role of national intermediaries

5th

Grants management and disbursements

6thFinancial reporting systems

7thInstitutional risk assessment

8th

Effective Communication of research results

9thTraining and capacity building in research management

10th

Commercialization of research outputs

11th

Safeguarding intellectual property rights

12th

Strategies for using evidence to inform policy such as how to write a policy brief

13th

Quality assurance and ethics in research

14th

Monitoring, evaluation, and learning in project management

15th

Gender equality and inclusion strategies

16th

Monitoring, evaluation, and learning in Council internal processes

17th

Policymaking processes

18th

2.2.3 Technical support needs to strengthen the National Research and Innovation Funding Agency inSenegalAccording to the respondents in both the KII and FGD conducted in Senegal, the technical support needs for the
Senegalese Council are identified and rated as shown below.
Technical support

Prioritisation

Stakeholder engagement and policy dialogue on topical issues of R&I funding of interest
to Council

1stCommissioning of studies on specific STI issues relevant to Councils

2nd

Support on advocacy for increased R&I funding in the country from policy makers andparliamentarians

3rd

Drafting of STI policy documents/frameworks

4th

Brokering SRI agreements with other Councils and actors in the ecosystem

5thCreation of physical and online platforms for knowledge sharing among critical R&I
funding stakeholders in the country

6thOrganising benchmarking/learning visits to other well-performing Councils

7th

DAY 2: CO-DEVELOPING TAILOR-MADE PROGRAMMESThe second day started with a recap of day one activities. This was presented by Alfred Nyambane. Dr. Cynthia
took the participants through the co-development process and guided the participants on how to go about it. Twogroups were formed. Group 1 handled the technical support needed to strengthen the Research Council in
Senegal and Group 2 handled the training needs required to strengthen the Council.
Co-developed and co-designed Technical support needed to strengthen the Council
Priority

Item

Content

1

Strengthen the
Directorate for the
Financing of Scientific
Research andTechnological
Development(DFRSDT)

2

Gender andinclusion

Challenges

Solutions- Strengthenin - Conduct ag humanstudy onresources
gender andfinancing- Capacity
Have a genderbuilding(information
expert on themonitoring,
management
project
team
design,- Implement amonitoring
good genderandpolicyevaluation,- Technicalassistance- Staff control- Resistance tochange- Women's
Empowerment- Promotion of
femaleresearchers-- Staff motivation- Awareness and training

Stakeholder
commitment and policy
dialogue on current
issues related to R&I
funding and Council
interests- Help create - Inclusion ofa framework
institutions
including
addressing
stakeholders
gender issues- Have an- Implement joint
exhaustive
projectsmap- Collaborationand pooling ofstakeholders

3

Organizebenchmarking/learning
visits to othersuccessful councils- Helpidentify
successfulmodels- Benchmarki
ng missions- Inclusion of
institutions
addressing
gender issues- Involvement of
women- Allocate more - Mobilize PTF
funding for
financingmissions-

4

Drafting of STI policy
documents/frameworks- Conduct a
study ongood
practices(policies,
strategies,etc.)- Inclusion of
institutions
addressing
gender issues- Involvement of
women- Adaptabilityof goodpractices in
the national
context- Stakeholder
inclusion- Involve all
stakeholders- Translate goodpractices into national
policy and strategy

5Commission studies on -Conduct an
specific STI issues
impact study of
relevant to councils
STI financing
on industry
development-Investigate thecontribution of
STI financing toGDP- Inclusion of
institutions
addressing
gender issues- Involvement ofwomen-Lack ofstatistics/data-Lack ofcollaboration
between theprivate sector andresearch
institutions-Inadequate
resources

6-Recruit a Firm orConsultant for the impact
study-Recruit a Firm orConsultant or collaborate
with the ANSD for theinvestigation

Creation of physicaland online platforms
for knowledge sharing
between key actors in
R&I financing in the
country- Create adigitalfinancingobservatory- Havequalifiedpersonnel in
information
systemsmanagement- Include genderin digitalplatforms

7

Negotiate STI
agreements with othercouncils and ecosystem
actors

Negotiation andsigning of
MOUs with
Councils(successfulmodel) andother
stakeholders- Inclusion of
institutions
addressing
gender issues- Involvement ofwomen- Identification -Benchmarking mission
and application fundingof good-Strengthen the Council's
practices innegotiating capacities
financing- Adherence ofother actors to -Technical assistance fordefining collaboration andthe strategy
partnership management
defined intools
terms ofresearch
funding8Support for advocacy
for increased funding
for R&I in the country
from policymakers andparliamentarians-Help pool
resources andinterventions ofinstitutions
responsible forfinancing R&I-Engage womenpoliticians andparliamentarians to
advocate forincreased R&I
funding-Weak culture ofresearch andinnovation
funding in thepolitical debate
and among
parliamentarians-Spark politicalandparliamentary-Promote genderequality andopportunities in- Consider
women
inclusion andsafety in digitaltechnology-Lack ofexperience increating andoperating anobservatory-Mobilize own resources
and the contribution of
TFPs-Mobilize own resources
and the contribution of
TFPs-Recruit a firm or
consultant for the creation-Lack of qualified of the financing
personnel in theobservatory
creation andmanagement of-Strengthen staff capacity
onlinein the management,
information
coordination and security
systemsof information systems andthe observatory-Mobilization offinancing

Organize training
workshops for politicians
and parliamentarians on
the importance offinancing R&I

debate on R&I
funding

access to R&I
funding-Low percentageof women in the
R&I field

The participants reorganized and prioritized the technical support needs for strengthening research andinnovation financing in the country. The information was presented in a tabular format, with eight rows
representing the prioritized areas for interventions. The top six priorities identified by the participants are:
1. Strengthen the Directorate for the Financing of Scientific Research and Technological Development(DFRSDT)
2. Stakeholder commitment and policy dialogue on current issues related to R&I funding and Council
interests
3. Organise benchmarking/learning visits to other successful councils
4. Drafting of STI policy documents/frameworks
5. Commission studies on specific STI issues relevant to councils
6. Creation of physical and online platforms for knowledge sharing between key actors in R&I financing
in the country
For each of those priorities, the participants outlined the specific content areas, gender and inclusionconsiderations, challenges faced, and proposed solutions. The content areas cover a wide range of topics,
including research strategy management, policymaking processes, intellectual property rights, quality assurance
and ethics, gender equality strategies, monitoring and evaluation, fundraising, and partnership development.
The gender and inclusion considerations emphasize the need to involve women, young people, and individuals
with disabilities in research activities, decision-making processes, and funding opportunities. The challenges
identified include language barriers, lack of diversity in research questions, insufficient connections withstakeholders, lack of institutional support, and absence of gender-inclusive policies.
The proposed solutions involve upgrading infrastructure, research capacity building, policy advocacy,
stakeholder engagement, benchmarking missions, gender mainstreaming, and the creation of digital platforms
and observatories. The solutions also highlight the need for technical assistance, resource mobilization, andcollaboration with various actors, such as the private sector, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), andinternational partners.

Co-developed and co-designed Technical support needed to strengthen the Council in Senegal
Priority

THEMATICS /Training needareas

Content

Genderinclusion

Challenges

Solutions

Comments- Upgrading in
English/French- research must
address priority
questions andstimulateeconomic andsocialdevelopment- Strengthen theorganisation
andharmonisationof research- Cross-cutting
aspects- Need for a
multidisciplinar
y team ofexperts toaddress all
issues,- Participation of
all council
members- Inclusion andequality-- Raiseawarenessamongauthorities/
parliamentarians-- Lack of- include theinstitutiona
institutions
l support
involved
and people(DIVPITT,in charge
ASPIT, etc.)of theseand especially
issuesthe researchers- Mapping ofresearchers- Involve thepress, NGOs,
PTF, and users-

Take the- Language
genderbarrierdimension
into
consideration in allactions

1st

Research strategy
management- Skills andCapacity building
in research
management

2nd​- Policymaking
processes(Advocacy tools
and strategies)

3rd​- Safeguarding
intellectual
property rights forresearchers- Valorization of
results of research( Communication,
Commercialization, etc.)- Diversityofquestions
to beaddressed

4th​Fundraising andfinancialmanagement- Quality assurance
and ethics inresearch- Tools
missing- Designate
someoneresponsible forthese issues and- Develop tools- Gender equality
and inclusion
strategies- Lack ofpolicyaddressing
this issue- Empower- Low
women, young
representation
people, andof women inpeople withthe researchdisabilities andecosystemencourage their - Poor
participation inconsideration
activitiesof young
people and- Develop a
Gender,people with
Equality anddisabilities
Inclusion policy- Monitoring,evaluation, andlearning inCouncil internal
processes- Fundraising andgrantsmanshipstrategies- Lack ofdigitaltools

Set up adequate
equipment(platforms)

Involvemen t andempowerme
nt of
women
- Lack ofknowledgeofpotential
partners- Insufficientconnection
s with theactorsinvolved- Increase ofavailable funds- Centralize
funds- Insufficientfunding- 1 call/year(FIRST)- Benchmarking- Bring together
all thestakeholders
identified in the
researchecosystem- Increase
donors- Diversify
fundingsources andmethods(projects,
mobility,scholarships,
etc.)

5th​

- Partnershipdevelopment

6th- Online
management ofgrant calls

Lack ofdigitalplatform- Equip and train
the council

7th- Grants
management anddisbursements

Lack ofdigitalplatform- Equip and train
the council

8th ​- Financial reporting
systems

Reports

Periodic reports

The participants at the validation workshop reorganized and prioritized their training needs areas to effectively
address the challenges they face and align with their goals. The top priority identified was gender inclusion as across cutting issue across the training needs areas, recognizing the need to mainstream gender considerations
across all activities and actions of the council. Participants acknowledged challenges like language barriers andaimed to upgrade English/French skills to facilitate this. Additionally, they emphasized that research efforts
must address priority issues that can stimulate economic and social development in the country. Strengthening
research organization, harmonization, and considering cross-cutting aspects were also highlighted under thisoverarching gender inclusion priority.
Research strategy management emerged as the first key priority area. Building skills and capacities in research
management was deemed crucial, along with assembling a multidisciplinary team of experts to tackle thediverse range of questions and issues. Ensuring inclusive participation from all council members and promoting
equality were other important aspects under this priority. The second priority training needs area focused onpolicy making processes, with a need to develop effective advocacy tools and strategies to raise awarenessamong authorities and parliamentarians on critical research and development matters. Intellectual property
rights, valorization of research outputs, quality assurance, ethics, gender equality strategies, andmonitoring/evaluation of internal processes were also flagged as areas requiring attention and training. Financial
management and fundraising took the fourth priority slot, covering strategies for fundraising, grantsmanship,
empowering women's involvement, increasing available funds, and centralizing funding mechanisms.
Partnership development with potential partners, donors, stakeholders through benchmarking was ranked fifth.
Finally, establishing digital platforms for online grant management, disbursements, and financial reporting
systems were the lower prioritized needs to streamline council operations. The reorganized priorities
demonstrated the council's commitment to gender-responsive research, strategic management, policymaking
influence, sustainable financing, and collaborative partnerships to drive impactful research and innovation in
Senegal.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the reorganized priorities outlined during the validation workshop reflect a strategic approach toaddress challenges and align efforts with overarching goals. Gender inclusion emerged as a top priority,
underscoring the need to mainstream gender considerations across all activities. Research strategy management
was identified as crucial, emphasizing the importance of building skills and assembling multidisciplinary teams.
Policymaking processes, intellectual property rights, quality assurance, and financial management also featured
prominently, highlighting the council's commitment to fostering impactful research and innovation in Senegal.
Through collaborative partnerships and strategic planning, the council aims to drive sustainable development
and positive societal change.

A Group photograph of participants during SRIFA validation workshop in Senegal

Workshop Programme
Day 1: Understanding the Research and Innovation Funding Landscape

12th March 2024

Morning Session: Opening and Overview
9:00 - 9:30

Registration

Susan Mburu

9:30 – 9:45

Welcome Remarks.

Prof. Cheikhou Kane

9:45 -10:00

Opening Remarks.

Dia Tine Seikhou

10:00 - 10:30

Introduction to Workshop Objectives and Expected
Outcomes.

Prof. Peter Onwualu

10:30 – 11:00

Tea BreakSession 1: Presentation of Preliminary Results

11:00 – 11:45

Presentation of Senegal report

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

11:45 – 12:45

Interactive Q&A Session.

Alfred Nyambane

12:45 – 2:00

Lunch BreakAfternoon Session: In-depth Stakeholder Engagement

2:00 – 3:30

Breakout Sessions: Stakeholder Group Discussions on
Prioritization of Training Needs and Technical Support.

3:30 – 4:00

Group Presentations on Identified Challenges andOpportunities.

4:00 – 4:30

Plenary Discussion: Key Themes Emerging from
Stakeholder Engagements.

4.30 – 6.00

Networking Session

Alfred Nyambane/
Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo/Prof. Peter Onwualu/
Susan Mburu

13th March 2024

Day 2: Co-Developing Tailor-Made Programs
Morning Session: Recap and Objective Setting
9:00 - 9:30

Registration

Susan Mburu

9:30 – 9:45

Recap and review of Day 1.

Alfred Nyambane

9:45 -10:30

Introduction to Co-development Process.

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

10:30 – 11:00

Tea BreakSession 2: Co-Development Workshops
11:00 – 11:40

Workshop 1: Designing Tailor-Made Training Programs.

ALL

11:40 – 12:20

Workshop 2: Identifying Technical Support Needs.

ALL

12:20 – 1:00

Cross-Group Discussions and Insights Sharing.

ALL

1.00 – 2.00

LunchbreakAfternoon Session: Implementation Planning

2:00 -2:30

Presentation of Co-Developed Program.

Council Representative

2:30 – 3:30

Feedback and Iterative Refinement.

ALL

3:30 – 4:15

Roadmap for Implementation: Timelines andResponsibilities.

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

4:15 – 4:30

Closing Remarks and Next Steps.

Prof. Peter Onwualu

List of Participants
S/N

NAME

INSTITUTION

EMAIL

1.

Dame Niang

Agence Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique dniang14@hotmail.com
Appliquée (ANSRA)

2.

Soukeye Dia Tine

Ministry for Higher Education, Research andInnovation (MESRI)-Head of ResearchCouncilsoukeye.diatine@gmail.com

3.

Tafsir Babacar Ndoye

General Directorate for Research andInnovation (DGRI)-Council Coordinator

ndoyetafsir@hotmail.fr

4.

Alioune Badara Diouf

DGRI

aliousy88@hotmail.com

5.

Mme Marie Fall Ndecky

DGRI

dioufdaouda1987@gmail.com

6.

Daouda Sy

DGRI

amadouder5@gmail.com

7.

El Hadji Samba Mbaye

Senegalese Agency for the Promotion of
Invention and Technological Innovation(ASPIT)

daf.aspit@gmail.com

8.

Babacar Faye

UCAD

babacar2.faye@ucad.edu.sn

9.

Cheikhou Kane

UCAD& ATPS National Chapter Coordinator

cheikhou.kane@esp.sn

10.

Roger Marcelin Faye

UAM

roger.faye@uam.edu.sn

11.

Mme Ndèye Marème SAMB

UAM

mareme.samb@uam.edu.sn

12.

Ibrahima Diagne

UGB

13.

Modou Fall

UCAD

Modou.fall@ucad.edu.sn

14.

Vincent Sambou

ESP/UCAD

vincent.sambou@esp.sn

15.

Fatou Bintou Sarr

UIDT

prfatoubintou.sarr@univ-thies.sn

16.

Awa Niang Fall

UCAD

awa10.fall@ucad.edu.sn

17.

Gallo SOW

UADB

papagallo.sow@uadb.edu.sn

18.

Pr Bamol Ali SOW

UASZ

bsow@univ-zig.sn

19.

Abdoul Aziz Ndiaye

IST

ndiaye.aziz1@gmail.com

20.

Ndeye Awa SENE

ESP/UCAD

ndeyeawa.sene@esp.sn

21.

Amadou Thierno GAYEESP/UCAD

atgaye@ucad.edu.sn

22.

Abdou Beukeu SOW

UCAD

abdoubeukeu@gmail.com

23.

Massamba SECKANAQ/SUP

massamba-sall.seck@anaqsup.sn

24.

Abdou NDOUR

ENDA- Coordinator
South Branch Coordinator/ Enda Energyndourabdouza@yahoo.fr

25.

Baidy Agne

The president, CNP (Conseil National duPatronat)

cnp@sentoo.sn

26.

Libasse Niang

Energeco- Directeur Généralenergecosn2@gmail.com

27.

Idrissa Sané

Soleildidisane@gmail.com

28.

Peter Onwualu

African University of Science and Technology aonwualu@aust.edu.ng(AUST)

29.

Cynthia Nwobodo

African Technology Policy Studies Network(ATPS)

cnwobodo@atpsnet.org

30.

Alfred Nyambane

ATPS

anyambane@atpsnet.org

31.

Susan Mburu

ATPS

smburu@atpsnet.org