Bridgestone Corporation - Climate Change 2019
C0. Introduction

C0.1(C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization.
The Bridgestone Group, headquartered in Tokyo, is the world’s largest tire and rubber company. In addition to tires for use in a wide
variety of applications, it also manufactures a broad range of diversified products, which include industrial rubber and chemical
products and sporting goods. Its products are sold in over 150 nations and territories around the world.
The Corporate Communication Division is responsible for answering the 2019 CDP questionnaire. This division coordinates andmanages the Group’s Environmental Mission Statement compliance, providing environmental support to business sections, Strategic
Business Units (SBU) at a global level.

C0.2(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.
Start date
Row January 1
1
2018

C0.3

CDP

End date

Indicate if you are providing emissions data for pastreporting years

Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing
emissions data for

December 31
2018

Please select<Not Applicable>(C0.3) Select the countries/regions for which you will be supplying data.
Argentina
Australia
BelgiumBrazilCanadaChina
Costa Rica
FranceHungary
India
Indonesia
Italy
Japan
Liberia
Malaysia
MexicoPhilippines
PolandRussian Federation
South Africa
Spain
Taiwan, Greater China
ThailandTurkeyUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America
Viet Nam

C0.4(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
JPY

C0.5
(C0.5) Select the option that describes the reporting boundary for which climate-related impacts on your business are being
reported. Note that this option should align with your consolidation approach to your Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas
inventory.
Operational control

C1. GovernanceC1.1(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-related issues within your organization?
Yes

C1.1a

CDP

(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) (do not include any names) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climaterelated issues.
Position of Please explain
individual(s)Chief
Executive
Officer(CEO)

The CEO is a member of the board, and has the highest-level responsibility for climate-related issues. The CEO is responsible for deciding policies
and measures or presenting to the board and overseeing company-wide management activities about management vision, mid-term strategies,
annual policies, etc. including climate-related issues.

C1.1b(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Frequency Governance Please explain
withmechanisms
which
into whichclimateclimaterelated
relatedissues are issues areaintegrated
scheduled
agendaitem
Scheduled Reviewing
Bridgestone, in accordance with its Articles of Incorporation and applicable laws, stipulates in the Regulations of the Board of Directors– someand guiding that the Board of Directors is the highest decision-making body within the company. The restructuring of the Board’s authority conducted
meetings
strategyin February 2018 enables the Board to focus more on deliberations concerning business strategy including: 1)Fundamental
Reviewing
management policy the foundation of which includes: -Our global CSR commitment (“Our Way to Serve”) -The Environmental Mission
and guiding Statement one of the important objectives of which is CO2 reduction 2)Mid-term policy which incorporates environmental/energy issues
major plans into its basis of consideration To the Board, situation and progress of execution of the items above are reported quarterly. In addition,of action
executive officer, responsible for Sustainability also report comprehensive activities on CSR and sustainability including environment
Reviewing
and climate change issues which have been once a year reviewed by the Global Executive Committee (Global EXCO), Bridgestone
and guiding highest-level execution committee. In 2018, (1)Progress of our CSR activities such as education and enhancement of Global CSR
risk
commitment - “Our Way to Serve”- one of the 3 priority areas of which is environment including CO2 reduction (2)Introduction of “themanagement Sustainable Global Procurement Policy” which contributes to CO2 reduction within our whole supply chain were reported to the board.
policies
Reviewing
and guiding
businessplans
Setting
performance
objectives
Monitoringandoverseeing
progressagainst goals
and targets
for
addressing
climaterelated
issues

C1.2(C1.2) Provide the highest management-level position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.

CDP

Name of the position(s) and/or
committee(s)Responsibility

Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related
issuesChief Executive Officer (CEO)Both assessing and managing climate-related risks andopportunities

QuarterlyC1.2a(C1.2a) Describe where in the organizational structure this/these position(s) and/or committees lie, what their associatedresponsibilities are, and how climate-related issues are monitored (do not include the names of individuals).

At Bridgestone, the CEO is the highest-level management position and has ultimate responsibility for management strategy andoverall management including climate-related issues. And the highest-level committee associated with the Bridgestone Group global
business execution is the Global Executive Committee (Global EXCO) . Members of the Global EXCO are nominated from full-time
corporate officers by the CEO/COO.

Reporting to the Global EXCO, Bridgestone has the Global CSR Enhancement Committee (GCEC) that is comprised of executive
officers in charge of CSR and representatives of SBUs and functions.

Under the GCEC, Bridgestone has 7 working groups* which are related to the areas focused in our Global CSR Commitment; "Our
Way to Serve". Each working group comprised of members from corresponding functions or related areas in each SBU and report to
the GCEC. Among the 7-working groups, the “Environment Working Group” summarizes and reports results related to CO2 goals andmanagement, and proposes strategies to the GCEC, taking into account the latest social trends that might represent environmental
risks/opportunities.

According to deliverables from the working groups including that from the Environment Working Group as written above, the GCEC
prioritizes CSR initiatives in areas pertaining to a variety of global issues including climate change, formulates global CSR strategies
and tracks the progress of activities in each area. Then, the GCEC reports to the Global EXCO and ask them for decision making onimportant issues.
As for risk management/assessment, the Bridgestone Group broadly divides risks into two categories: business strategic risks, which
are related to management decision-making, and operational risks, which include climate change risks and are related to daily
operations. The former is handled through business operations, while the latter is handled by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), who has
overall responsibility for managing risks and reports to the CEO.
*7 working groups under the GCEC: "Mobility", "People", "Environment", "Compliance, Fair Competition", "BCP, Risk Management","Human Rights, Labor Practices" and "Procurement"

C1.3(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets?
Yes

C1.3a

CDP

(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues (do not include thenames of individuals).
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
All employees
Types of incentives
Monetary reward
Activity incentivized
Emissions reduction project
Comment
At Bridgestone, business, departments and individuals who have made outstanding achievements, including various climatechange mitigation actions and results, such as achieving a CO2 reduction target, reducing energy use, and improving efficiency or
reducing waste among others can be recognized by the Representative Executive Officers in a company-wide event held on March
1, the foundation day, and also can be recognized every year by the head of the worksite in a regional event. Bridgestone’scommemorates its history and philosophy at its foundation day while reconfirming the direction the company will take in the future.
This event aims to raise employees’ awareness of corporate activities. A monetary recognition as well as a regional recognition isin place.
Who is entitled to benefit from these incentives?
All employees
Types of incentives
Recognition (non-monetary)
Activity incentivized
Environmental criteria included in purchases
Comment
The Bridgestone Group Awards is the highest global recognition program for all employees that rewards efforts of organizations
and individuals in five award categories. One of award categories, Environment, recognizes efforts related to climate change, suchas achieving a CO2 reduction target, reducing energy use, and improving efficiency or reducing waste. This award program, raises
awareness among employees and encourages their participation in environmental activities. Group Award winners are honored
each year during a ceremony held at Group headquarters in Tokyo. In 2019 the Group awarded the launch of 3 global policies
including the Global Sustainable Procurement Policy (presented in 2018) . This new procurement policy focuses on supplier’s
sustainable procurement practices that incorporate environmentally responsible measures for climate change, reduction of Green
House Gas (GHG) emissions as well as the use of energy as one of four major areas.

C2. Risks and opportunities

C2.1(C2.1) Describe what your organization considers to be short-, medium- and long-term horizons.
From (years)

To (years)

Short-term

05Medium-term

5

10Long-term

10

40Comment

C2.2(C2.2) Select the option that best describes how your organization's processes for identifying, assessing, and managing
climate-related issues are integrated into your overall risk management.
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk identification, assessment, and management processes
CDP

C2.2a(C2.2a) Select the options that best describe your organization's frequency and time horizon for identifying and assessing
climate-related risks.

Row 1

Frequency of monitoring

How far into the future are risks considered?

Six-monthly or more frequently>6 yearsComment

C2.2b(C2.2b) Provide further details on your organization’s process(es) for identifying and assessing climate-related risks.
1. Risk Assessment Structure in the Bridgestone Group
The Bridgestone Group broadly divides risks into two categories: business strategic risks, which are related to management decisionmaking, and operational risks, which include climate change risks and are related to daily operations. The former is handled throughbusiness operations, while the latter is handled by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), who has overall responsibility for managing risks andreports to the CEO. The Group promotes risk assessment as a part of comprehensive activities to appropriately manage risks
common to the operations, with consideration for the scale and characteristics of each site and Group company and without limitationof time period(Six years or more). Through the dual promotion of the Group's global unified activities and autonomous risk
management activities by branches, important risks common to the Group (Corporate risk, managing process of which is reported to
the CRO once every half a year) and risks of each site and Group company(Asset risk, countermeasures and yearly self assessmentof which are considered and conducted by each facility) are identified.

2. The process for assessing the potential size and scope of identified risks
In the Bridgestone group, both corporate and facilities conduct risk identification at least once a year, utilizing globally common
direction. Then, they evaluate risks, utilizing globally unified criteria which consists of viewpoints of their impact and possibility ofoccurrence. The Group standardized the degree of impacts of risks by impact-type such as human life/health, financial loss,
operational impact (period of suspension of sales and plant operation or time necessary for response), social trust and so on,
regardless the possible timing of occurrence. The criteria to determine rank differ by the impact-type. But as for environment relatedrisks including climate change and CO2 emission etc., the Group consider its possible impact is substantive when it falls under one of
the following criteria: “Strong feeling of discomfort extending to areas surrounding the office/plant, accompanied by health damage insome cases, or health damage caused externally over a wide area”, “Excess limit of financial amount (determined by company)”,“Over two weeks’ impact on division (period of suspension of sales and plant operation or time necessary for response)”, or “Trustdamaged in terms of the company’s constitution (falsified reports, organizational scandal)”. On the other hand, we also estimate
possibility of occurrence and classify them into 4 ranks based on the likelihood.

3. How climate-related risks are identified and assessed at a company/asset level
As the result of the evaluation based on impact and possibility of occurrence, the risks “with a high possibility of occurring and major
impact” and “with a significant impact of it should occur, although its possibility is low” are considered “Significant risk” and classified
into “Corporate risk”. And others are into “Asset Risk”.

4.The process to determine the relative significance of climate-related risks in relation to other risks
The process for risk identification and assessment mentioned above is also applied to the risks other than environment related ones
including climate change, so various risks which we may face can be assessed in comparable manner.

CDP

5.The definitions of risk terminologies used and references to existing risk classification frameworks
Bridgestone’s definition of “risk” is events (incidents, accidents, natural disasters or problems, etc.) that may cause damage toorganizations, employees, products and services, financial conditions, brands, customers, shareholders, business partners orneighbors. In addition, Bridgestone promotes improvement of risk identification and management framework referring ISO 31000, theinternational standard for risk management.

6.Definition of substantive financial or strategic impact on the business
Through the process written above, we figure out substantive risks. From financial perspective, the threshold for the judgement iswhether the risk is anticipated to cause more financial loss than a standardized amount. And also, from strategic point of view, thestandardized degree determined by impact-type such as human life/health, financial loss, operational impact(period of suspension ofsales and plant operation or time necessary for response), social trust and so on is utilized to judge. The concrete criteria including
the amount of financial loss is determined by each of corporate, sites and Group companies which conduct the risk assessment, withconsideration for the scale and characteristics of them.

C2.2c

CDP

(C2.2c) Which of the following risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Relevance Please explain&
inclusion
Current
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Recently, various regulations have been introduced for the purpose of curbing climate change. With respect to tires also, maximum limits
on rolling resistance and the labelling system have been introduced. Following such new regulations, operational cost such as todevelop low rolling resistance tires, to measure rolling resistance coefficient value and to print labels has been increased. There is apossibility of further increase of operational cost in case such regulations become stricter and/or expand globally. The global Environment
Working Group is monitoring social trends including current regulations and Bridgestone encourages the development and launch of low
rolling resistance tires to contribute to CO2 emissions reduction activities.

Emerging
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

There are discussions about introducing carbon pricing in many countries, and since Bridgestone has facilities in over 20 countries, there
is a possibility of increasing operational cost. The global Environment Working Group is monitoring social trends including emerging
regulations such as carbon tax, etc. and Bridgestone encourages activities to reduce CO2 emissions.

Technology Relevant,alwaysincluded

There is a possibility of sales decrease in case of becoming less competitive because of delay of low carbon technology development
enhancing energy efficiency of products/manufacturing. By introducing such energy- efficient technologies, Bridgestone encourages
providing products and services which can contribute to reduce CO2 emissions, such as fuel-efficient tires.

Legal

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Bridgestone encourages ESG disclosures, however, there is a possibility of litigation claim in case of providing inaccurate information on
climate-related issues such as description of energy efficiency at a tire label.

MarketRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Bridgestone encourages providing products and services which can contribute to reducing CO2 emissions, such as fuel-efficient tires.
However, changes on climate-related requirements in the market may impact our sales. For instance, expectations for fuel efficient tires
and retread tires are increasing, however, there is a possibility of losing competitiveness and drop in market share in case of delaying thedevelopment and providing tires which can improve customer satisfactions related to CO2 reductions. In addition, in case that global
temperature becomes significantly higher and snowfall becomes lower, demand for winter tires might be lower. The global Environment
Working Group is monitoring social trends including market requirements from customers such as automakers.

Reputation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Bridgestone encourages ESG disclosures, however, there might be a potential of criticisms and drop in stock price in case of providing
inaccurate information on climate-related issues. The global Environment Working Group monitors external ratings of Bridgestone byexternals. The global Environment Working Group also monitors social trends including reputations of advanced companies on ESG as
benchmark and criticisms for companies with ESG related misdoings to avoid future negative reputational impacts.

AcutephysicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

There is a risk of rubber supply shortage caused by drought or floods occurred in regions where para rubber tree grows. It can lead tolower profit because of the higher rubber procurement cost. In addition, severe weather such as floods and hurricanes could affectoperations at manufacturing facilities and/or distribution channels. The global Environment Working Group is monitoring social trends
including yearly climate change status in all regions.

Chronic
physicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

There is a risk of rubber supply shortage as climate pattern changes in regions where para rubber tree grows and rubber production
efficiency worsen. It can lead to lower profit because of a higher rubber procurement cost. The global Environment Working Group ismonitoring social trends including publications about long-term estimations related to climate-change.

Upstream

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

There are risks of rubber supply shortage caused by (1)drought or floods occurred in regions where para rubber tree grows (it can lead tolower profit because of a higher rubber procurement cost) and (2)climate pattern change in regions where para rubber tree grows andrubber production efficiency worsen (It can lead to lower profit because of a higher rubber procurement cost). The global Environment
Working Group is monitoring social trends including yearly climate change status in all regions, publications about long-term estimations
related to climate-change, movements about supplier activities for adaptation to climate risks etc.

Downstream Relevant,alwaysincluded

In Bridgestone’s value chain and business, automobile market is one of the primary fields. Therefore, Bridgestone encourages providing
products and services which can contribute to reducing CO2 emissions, such as fuel-efficient tires. However, changes in market
requirements may possibly impacts sales. For instance, expectations for fuel efficient tires and retread tires are increasing, however,there is a possibility of losing competitiveness and drop in market share in case of delay in developing and providing tires which can
improve customer satisfactions related to CO2 reductions. The global Environment Working Group is monitoring social trends including
market requirements from customers such as automakers.

C2.2d(C2.2d) Describe your process(es) for managing climate-related risks and opportunities.

1.Bridgestone’s approach to managing climate-related risks
For risk management, the Bridgestone Group broadly divides risks into two categories: business strategic risks, which are related to
management decision-making, and operational risks, which include climate change risks and are related to daily operations. The
former is handled through business operations, while the latter is handled by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO), who has overall
responsibility for managing risks including climate change and reports to the CEO.

The Group promotes comprehensive activities to appropriately manage risks common to it, with consideration for the scale andCDPcharacteristics of each site and Group company and without limitation of time period, more than 6 years. Through the dual promotionof Group global unified activities and autonomous risk management activities, the Group identifies, prevents and mitigates risks, andformulate Crisis Management and Business Continuity Plans to enable appropriate support for the continuation or resumption ofbusiness.

<Process to mitigate, transfer, accept, control and/or prioritize climate-related risks>
The Group assesses risks, utilizing globally unified criteria which consists of viewpoints of their impact and possibility of occurrence
then classified into “Corporate Risk” and “Asset Risk” (Detail of the methodology is written in 2.2b). As for the Corporate Risk, it
discusses on and establishes action plan of measures to manage the risks from various perspective such as mitigation, transfer,accept and/or control. And the progress is reported to the CRO once every half-year period. Then the CRO deliberates the reportcontent and as necessary, gives instructions for improvements to responsible department. As for the Asset Risk, corresponding
facilities consider countermeasure and reduce impact of the risk. And they conduct self assessment of the progress per year andperform corrective actions as necessary.

2. Management processes regarding climate-related opportunities
As the first step of our managing process of climate-related opportunities, the Environmental Working Group under the GCEC
comprising members from each Strategic Business Unit monitors social trends and oversees company’s activities on CO2 reduction,
biodiversity, resource efficiency and so on.
Based on the discussion at the Environmental Working Group level, the overall global decision-making regarding the environment,
including climate change, is normally carried out by the GCEC. Members of the committee are composed of an executive officer incharge of CSR and representatives of regions and functions. As for important items, the GCEC reports them to the Global EXCO andask them for decision on them. Then, based on the management plan finalized at Global EXCO, SBUs reflect it in each Mid-termManagement Plan, prioritizing such opportunities from effect and investment viewpoints.

3. Case Study<Physical risk>
For Bridgestone, disruption of supplies of raw material including natural rubber is regarded as one of major risks. So far, its probabilityof occurrence is not very high. But on the other hand, as the Group uses large quantities of natural rubber in tires and other rubber
products, it estimates its potential financial impact is substantive. Therefore, the Group classifies it into Corporate Risk. From climate
related viewpoint, productivity of natural rubber which is the main raw material in tires could be decreased by droughts in South East
Asia as primary growing area of para rubber trees. Then, shortage and cost increase of natural rubber could adversely affect theCompanies’ operating results and financial position.
As part of countermeasures, the Group is promoting various research projects aimed at practical applications for guayule, whichshows promise as a new supply source for natural rubber. Aiming for practical applications in the 2020s, it will continue to strengthen
various factors going forward, including improving guayule productivity through sustainable methods, establishing production
processes and improving logistics.

<Transition risk>
The Group's operations around the world is subject to diverse national laws and regulations including environmental protection. It
considers such Legal, regulatory and litigation risk could have potential to be one of the major risks. Labeling systems and regulations
regarding tire performance like fuel efficiency are one of such risks. This risk has potential to decrease sales if investment in newtechnology for lower rolling resistance -which makes tires more fuel-efficient in align with other performances including cost - isunsuccessful. As the tire business is our primary business, the potential financial impact is significant. As this type ofsystems/regulations are expanding around the world, the probability of occurrence is relatively high. Therefore, Bridgestone regards
this risk as Corporate Risk and tackle with developing tires with low rolling resistance.

CDP

C2.3
(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic
impact on your business?
Yes

C2.3a
(C2.3a) Provide details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on yourbusiness.
Identifier
Risk 1
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk typeTransition riskPrimary climate-related risk driver
Policy and legal: Increased pricing of GHG emissions
Type of financial impact<Not Applicable>
Company- specific description
Introducing carbon pricing in various countries would cause increase of operational cost since Bridgestone has facilities in over 20
countries. For example, in October 2012, the Tax for Climate Change Mitigation was introduced in Japan. In response to such
introduction, the Bridgestone Group is paying more taxes directly according to the use of fuel and indirectly according to the use ofelectricity. Specifically, by using a CO2 emissions factor of each fossil fuel, the tax rate per unit quantity (kilo litter or tonne) is set
so that each tax burden is equal to 289 yen per tonne of CO2 emissions. (The tax rate was raised in three stages over three and ahalf years). In addition, there is a possibility of increasing payments since the Paris Agreement was ratified and there are
discussions about introducing carbon pricing in Japan. For Bridgestone, it is an important climate risk to consider because approx.
30% of our manufacturing facilities are located in Japan and CO2 emission of these facilities accounts for approx. 24% of our
Scope1 & Scope 2.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
High
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
951000Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Current carbon tax rate in Japan is 289 yen/tCO2e, however, financial impact in case of increase in tax rate can be roughly
calculated as following formula. Financial impact = increase in tax rate times CO2 emission volume in Japan (about 951 thousand
yen/1 yen increase in tax rate. This calculation includes impact of price increase of electricity)
Management method
CDPIn order to reduce CO2 emissions, we are promoting conversion to energy that produces little CO2 emissions and also reducing
energy use itself. Energy saving initiatives at production sites is one of our primary activities. We have been implementing CO2
reduction measures such as the introduction of high efficiency equipment, installing steam turbine generators, converting to fuelemitting less CO2 and so on. In addition, in 2018, Bridgestone announced its smart factory concept with its original ICT/IoT
technology. From an energy perspective, ICT named “Bridgestone Intelligent Device” conduct energy control utilizing AI one of thecontribution of which is automatic optimization of manufacturing process utilizing market and development information of product.
Bridgestone will introduce this new concept sequentially from 2019 including fostering at least 100 data scientists. Investments
mainly for enhancing energy saving through improvements of equipment, including upgrading equipment to high efficiency
equipment and converting them to inverter, at Bridgestone plants amounted to 4,079million yen in 2018.
Cost of management
4079000000
Comment
As example of other activities, we are promoting energy saving initiatives at offices. We have reduced the number of units ofequipment by promoting scrapping and integration through the visualization of the layout and utilization rate of office equipment
such as printers and multifunction office equipment. We also have long succeeded in reducing power consumption by resetting
illuminance by thorough measurement of lighting illuminance of business offices. We have introduced an “electric power
visualization” system at the business office of Technical Center which is used to visualize the status of power consumption andverify the effects of reduction measures and to set reduction targets.
Identifier
Risk 2
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Supply chain
Risk typePhysical riskPrimary climate-related risk driver
Chronic: Changes in precipitation patterns and extreme variability in weather patterns
Type of financial impact
Increased operating costs (e.g., higher compliance costs, increased insurance premiums)
Company- specific description
Bridgestone’s main business is tires whose raw materials consist of natural rubber. Currently, natural rubber is almost entirely
made from the sap(latex) of para rubber tree. 90% of the growing area of para rubber tree is in Southeast Asia and owing todroughts in the tropical rainforests of Southeast Asia caused by El Nino, the deciduous period for para rubber tree becomes longer
and the period during which sap can be obtained becomes shorter, thereby leading to a decrease in yield. As a result, the balanceof supply and demand is expected to be upset and the price of natural rubber, which plays a vital role as a raw material of tires, is
expected to surge. If the price of natural rubber rises and it becomes difficult to procure such rubber, the cost of tire production will
increase. This in turn is expected to result in lower profit or a decrease in share due to higher tire prices.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
Medium-high
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
5220000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
At this moment, we are unable to accurately estimate the financial implications. However, we estimate that once this scenario takes

CDPplace, the procurement cost will increase drastically. For example, an increase of about 5.22 billion yen worldwide for every yen
rise per kilogram of whole raw material for our production including natural and synthetic rubber, based on 2018 production levels.
Management method
In order to avoid the risk above, Bridgestone produces a portion of the raw materials at our own rubber tree farms, as well as
establishes disease diagnostic technology and conducts research on genome decoding aimed at breed improvement. Throughthese efforts, we are augmenting output and preparing for the risk of being unable to procure. The Bridgestone Group owns natural
rubber tree farms in Indonesia and Liberia. The entire research and development expenses of the Global Group, including
measures like establishing disease diagnostic technology and conducting research on genome decoding aimed at breed
improvement totaled 103.5 billion yen per year in 2018.
Cost of management
103500000000
Comment
Identifier
Risk 3
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Customer
Risk typeTransition riskPrimary climate-related risk driver
Reputation: Increased stakeholder concern or negative stakeholder feedback
Type of financial impact<Not Applicable>
Company- specific description
Disclosure of GHG related information is increasingly being required around the world. Meanwhile, foreign investors own about
27% of Bridgestone stocks. If Bridgestone stocks are deemed to be outside the scope of ESG investment by financial institutions
due to our failure to disclose information or negative campaigns are conducted by NGOs there is a risk that this would lead to a
decline in the stock price. We think the reputation risk would be comparatively higher for Bridgestone because of its leader positionin the industry and should be managed properly by the measures as written below.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
About as likely as not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
760000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
A one-yen decline in the stock price per share would result in total losses of corporate value approximately 760 million yen as ofDecember 31, 2018. It brings more difficult access to capital.
Management method
In order to prevent decreasing in brand value, we believe that it is important to accurately disclose information on supply chain
GHG. When disclosing GHG information, we deem the following 3 points crucial. 1) Guarantee of reliability of information We
obtained a third-party verification of our 2018 calculation results through an external organization and disclosed it. And we utilize
external evaluation schemes to secure objectivity from stakeholders’ viewpoint. As the result of such effort by 2018, We wereranked or selected to A- on CDP Climate Change, DJSI World and FTSE4Good Index Series etc. as of Feb.2019. 2) SecureCDPmethod of information disclosure We thinks we can meet stakeholder’s expectations by disclosing information in accordance with
CDP requirements. The disclosure connected with the objective under long-term environmental vision has made our initiatives
easily understandable. 3) Secure means of access to information We use our website and Global Sustainability Report to make itpossible for all stakeholders to access information of our various activities. The effort to communicate with stakeholders through the
Global Sustainability Report was awarded “Environmental Communication Awards 2017 Excellent prize” by the Ministry of theEnvironment of Japan in Feb, 2018. We spent approx. 33 million yen in 2018 in total for implementing measures above such as
obtaining third-party verification of our 2018 GHG calculation results and issuing a Sustainable Report.
Cost of management
33000000
Comment
Identifier
Risk 4
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Customer
Risk typeTransition riskPrimary climate-related risk driverTechnology: Unsuccessful investment in new technologies
Type of financial impact<Not Applicable>
Company- specific description
Recently, various regulations have been introduced to curb climate change. With respect to tires also, maximum limits on rolling
resistance and the labelling system have been introduced. Although tires do not emit GHG when they are used, passenger cars andtrucks emit a large volume of GHG. Improving fuel consumption, would be a countermeasure against such emissions. Although thefuel consumption of passenger cars and trucks is determined by engine performance and various resistance factors, among suchfactors, the impact of resistance by tire is said to be about 10-20% for passenger cars and about 20-30% for trucks, though thisdepends on driving conditions. Resistance by tire mentioned here is referred to as “rolling resistance” which is resistance arisingwhen a tire rolls. In other words, the same vehicle will have better fuel consumption if the tire rolling resistance is low. As such, eachcountry is adopting the following systems as a measure to lower rolling resistance.1. Set a maximum value for rolling resistance andprohibit sale if this maximum value is exceeded. (Maximum limit) 2. Grade rolling resistance according to 5-7 levels and carry outlabelling. For example, Europe (EU member states), South Korea, Brazil and the Middle East (GCC, Israel) have already introduced
the maximum limit and labelling systems, and Japan has introduced the labelling system as a voluntary industry standard.
Bridgestone considers that these systems could be are a risk to decrease sales units if investment in new technology for betterrolling resistance in align with other performances including price is unsuccessful. Therefore, we are developing products with
better rolling resistance to prevent reduction of sales volume.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Very likely
Magnitude of impact
High
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
30510000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
The global tire market is valued at approximately 168 billion US dollars in 2017 (Reference: Tire Business – Global Tire Company
Rankings) and is expected to grow two to three-fold by 2050. Our tire sales in 2018 was about 3,051 billion yen. When considering

CDPthe maximum limit and labelling system of rolling resistance as an risk to bring financial impact, we estimate potential financial
impact to be 30.51 billion yen per 1% decreasing of annual sales. The actual value depends on the degree of sales decrease oftires not satisfying fuel efficiency level required by a future system.
Management method
The most important factor to prevent this risk is the development of technology for reducing tire-rolling resistance. To this end, weare developing technology for tires in overall focusing on the molecular structure of raw materials, weight reduction, internal
structure of tires, and tire groove configuration, among other things. As example of the achievements in 2018, we successfully
expand to original equipment for new vehicles of the “Large and Narrow concept tire” employing “ologic” technology. Tires with thisnew technology are able to realize levels of fuel efficiency that greatly exceed those of the fuel-efficient tires we have already put on
the market, and as a result, this is expected to reduce CO2 and occurrence of this risk. Additionally, we have successfully
developed a new polymer to bond rubber and resins at the molecular level. This new polymer, called High Strength Rubber (HSR),
boasts unprecedented durability with higher crack resistance, higher abrasion resistance and tensile strength than natural rubber,which itself has higher destruction resistance than common synthetic rubber. The new material could contribute to improving fuelefficiency with its low rolling resistance thanks to lighter weight of tires accompanied by reducing material for its higher durability.
We invested in development aiming to reduce rolling resistance every year. Tire’s research and development expenses, including
such investments, totaled 86.7 billion yen in 2018.
Cost of management
86700000000
Comment

C2.4(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic
impact on your business?
Yes

C2.4a
(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on
your business.
Identifier
Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Customer
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development and/or expansion of low emission goods and services
Type of financial impact
Increased revenue through demand for lower emissions products and services
Company-specific description
Recently, various regulations have been introduced with the purpose of curbing climate change. With respect to tires also,
maximum limits on rolling resistance and the labelling system have been introduced. Although tires do not emit GHG when they areused, passenger cars and trucks emit a large volume of GHG. Improving fuel consumption, etc. would be a countermeasure against
such emissions. Although the fuel consumption of passenger cars and trucks is determined by engine performance and various
resistance factors, among such factors, the impact of resistance by tire is said to be about 10-20% for passenger cars and about
20-30% for trucks, though this depends on driving conditions. The tire resistance mentioned here is referred to as “rolling
resistance” which is resistance arising when a tire rolls. In other words, the same vehicle will have better fuel consumption if the tire
rolling resistance is low. As such, each country is adopting the following systems as a measure to lower rolling resistance. 1. Set amaximum value for rolling resistance and prohibit sale if this maximum value is exceeded. (Maximum limit) 2. Grade rolling
resistance according to 5-7 levels and carry out labelling. For example, several regions and countries such as Europe (EU member
states), South Korea, Brazil and the Middle East (GCC, Israel) have already introduced the maximum limit and labelling systems,
CDPand Japan has introduced only the labelling system as a voluntary industry standard. Bridgestone sells tires all over the world as a
global leader in the industry and the portion of tires for passenger/trucks/buses which are strongly related to the systems above
accounts for 71% of our revenue. Therefore, Bridgestone considers the introduction of these systems could be comparatively large
opportunity to fairly disclose and appeal to consumers the maximum limit and grading of rolling resistance of our products due to its
wide range of region of operation.
Time horizon
Current
Likelihood
Very likely
Magnitude of impact
High
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
30510000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
The global tire market was valued at approximately 168 billion US dollars in 2017 (Reference: Tire Business – Global Tire Company
Rankings) and is expected to grow two to three-fold by 2050. By considering the maximum limit and labelling system of rolling
resistance as an opportunity and making use of such opportunity, there is huge financial potential. Sales of tires, including fuelefficient tires, were about 3,051 billion yen in 2018. We estimate potential financial impact is 30.51 billion yen per 1% increasing ofannual sales. Its actual value depends on percentage of sales increase by such fuel-efficient tires.
Strategy to realize opportunity
The most important factor in taking advantage of such systems is the development of technology to reduce tire-rolling resistance.
To this end, we are developing technology for tires, focusing on the overall molecular structure of raw materials, weight reduction,internal structure of tires, and tire groove configuration, among other things. At the same time, we are implementing the sales
strategy of focusing on expanding sales of “ECOPIA” tires with substantially lower rolling resistance as a global brand. We havesuccessfully been increasing sales of “ECOPIA” brand products and will foster this brand continuously. Also, we successfully
developed the “Large and Narrow concept tire” employing “ologic” technology as a new tire environmental technology. Tires withthis new technology are able to realize levels of fuel efficiency that greatly exceed those of the fuel-efficient tires we have alreadyput on the market, and as a result, this is expected to reduce CO2. In addition, we are promoting development of tires with betterrolling resistance by setting a mid-term target for us to reduce 25% of rolling resistance vs 2005 until 2020. As of 2018, we achieved
21% reduction vs 2005 (improved approx.2% from 2017) which is equivalent to 13.4 million t-CO2 of our Scope3 reduction from2005. We invested in development aiming to reduce rolling resistance every year. Tire’s research and development expenses,
including such investments, totalled 86.7 billion yen in 2018.
Cost to realize opportunity
86700000000
Comment
Identifier
Opp2
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Supply Chain
Opportunity type
Resilience
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Resource substitutes/diversification
Type of financial impact
Increased reliability of supply chain and ability to operate under various conditions
Company-specific description
CDP

Currently, natural rubber, the main raw material of tires, is almost entirely produced from the sap of para rubber trees. 90% of
growing areas of para rubber trees are in Southeast Asia and its price often fluctuates due to issues such as demand change,
climate change and speculation etc. Therefore, finding a substitute for the raw material source will be one key factor to enhancecompetitiveness and resilience of Bridgestone’s business. The Bridgestone Group proactively conducts research and production ofnatural rubber resources consisting of Guayule cultivated in arid climates and Russian Dandelion cultivated in temperate climatesas substitutes for para rubber trees. Additionally, we have successfully developed a new polymer to bond rubber and resins at themolecular level. This new polymer, called High Strength Rubber (HSR), boasts unprecedented durability with higher crack
resistance, higher abrasion resistance and tensile strength than natural rubber, which itself has higher destruction resistance thancommon synthetic rubber. We expect this new material would be alternative material of natural rubber and/or contribute to reducing
its usage amount. Through these activities, we can use this opportunity to differentiate ourselves in terms of diversity of raw
material source and cost competitiveness and supply of tires.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
LikelyMagnitude of impact
Medium-high
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
210000000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Financial impact to tire sales in case of change in Bridgestone’s share can be roughly calculated as following formula. Financial
impact = Current sales divided by current share multiplied by percentage of change in share (about 210 billion yen per 1 % change
in share). *The calculation is based on approx. 3,051 billion yen as Bridgestone’s sales in tire business and 14.5% as
Bridgestone’s share in the tire industry in 2017
Strategy to realize opportunity
As a means of gaining opportunities, we have been promoting research and development on alternative resources in other climatic
zones aimed at easing the overconcentration of natural rubber producing areas in Southeast Asia. 1. Guayule: The BridgestoneGroup conducts research and development of guayule as a new natural rubber source replacing para rubber tree to stabilize
supply. As guayule grows in arid regions, unlike para rubber tree, and the rubber component contained in its tissue has similar
properties to the natural rubber harvested from the para rubber tree, it is expected to be a new natural rubber source. We
commenced experimental production of natural rubber harvested from guayule in 2015 and are conducting studies for its practicalapplication in the 2020s. 2. Russian Dandelion: Russian Dandelion, a plant native to Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, is a material fornatural rubber and is cultivated in temperate zones which are completely different from the climate conditions for para rubber tree.
3.High Strength Rubber (HSR): Our new polymer to bond rubber and resins at the molecular level. It boasts unprecedented
durability with higher crack resistance, higher abrasion resistance and tensile strength than natural rubber, which itself has higher
destruction resistance than common synthetic rubber. The entire research and development expenses on Group/Global basis,including development of alternative resources above, totalled 103.5 billion yen per year in 2018.
Cost to realize opportunity
103500000000
Comment
Identifier
Opp3
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Customer
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
CDPShift in consumer preferences
Type of financial impact
Increased revenue through demand for lower emissions products and services
Company-specific description
Bridgestone delivers a wide range of products to customers around the world, including tires, rubber and other diversified products.
We have been providing best-in-class services, sensor devices, data-driven technology and tire asset management systems as“Solution Business” that enable increased productivity for our customers. Among the customers, Commercial Fleet operators areunder constant pressure to maximize their fleet performance whilst minimizing costs. Bridgestone’s integrated solution offering,combining premium products, extensive services and state of the art digital platforms provide fleet customers with safer, moresustainable and economical mobility. From climate-related viewpoint, improvement of fuel efficiency brought by our solution havebeen contributing to CO2 reduction. In case that stricter emission control and/or carbon pricing etc. are introduced with the rise ofsocial momentum in future, CO2 emission reduction would become more important theme for such operators. We consider it could
be our business opportunity. Bridgestone has focused on this solution business in recent years by measures represented by theacquisition of Bandag in 2007, introducing “ECO Value Pack” service which bundles new tires, retread tires and tire maintenanceservice into a single package for transport operators and other customers. Therefore, Bridgestone would be able to grasp the
expansion of solution business related opportunity comparatively easily.
Time horizon
Current
Likelihood
Very likely
Magnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
210000000000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Success of our solution business would contribute to growth of our tire business including sales increase. Financial impact to thetire sales in case of change in Bridgestone’s share can be roughly calculated as following formula. Financial impact = Current sales
divided by current share multiplied by percentage of change in share (about 210 billion yen per 1 % change in share). *The
calculation is based on approx. 3,051 billion yen as Bridgestone’s sales in tire business and 14.5% as Bridgestone’s share in thetire industry in 2017
Strategy to realize opportunity
As announced in Feb, 2019, Bridgestone recently introduced a new strategy named “Bridgestone T&DPaaS(Tire&Diversified
products as a Solution)”. The “Bridgestone T&DPaaS” will sort and link digitally, all the necessary customer, products and service
related info (data) and its causality obtained from our deep knowledge and insight, to our Engineering chain, Value chain and
Supply chain. Combined with our “Dan-Totsu Products” and “Dan-Totsu” Service, this whole ecosystem will continuously create
new values including Co-Creation with the customer, as the “Dan-Totsu” Solution. *Dan-Totsu means “the absolute and clear
leader” To drive our tire solution business further, development of various technologies other than tires is necessary. Among them,for example, retread technology and business will be one of the key components. We will drive the development of retread
technology to ensure durability, increase the number of times retreaded and to contribute to the lifecycle CO2 reduction of tires.
Tire’s research and development expenses, including such investments, totaled 86.7 billion yen in 2018.
Cost to realize opportunity
86700000000
Comment

C2.5

CDP

(C2.5) Describe where and how the identified risks and opportunities have impacted your business.
ImpactDescription

Products
andservices

Impacted Tire industry has maximum limits on rolling resistance and the labelling system have been introduced. For Bridgestone, failing to respond tothese systems could be a risk of sales decline of ECO products, however, it also could be an opportunity to increase our sales of suchproducts by improving rolling resistance of a tire. The potential of financial impact to net sales is estimated 30.51 billion yen per 1% of oursales is increased by taking the opportunity or decreased by occurrence of the risk. Since this risk impact is big, Bridgestone provides
products and services which can reduce customers' CO2 emissions such as fuel-efficient tires, in order to take opportunities of productefficiency regulations and standards and changing consumer behavior toward low rolling resistance tires.

Supplychain
and/orvalue
chain

Impacted There is a risk of rubber supply shortage as climate pattern changes in regions where para rubber tree grows and rubber production
efficiency worsen. It can lead to lower profit because of higher rubber procurement cost. The actual impact is estimated 5.22 billion yen
worldwide for every yen rise per kilogram of whole raw material for our production including natural and synthetic rubber, based on 2018
production level. Since this risk of impact is big, Bridgestone has the Global Sustainable Procurement Policy, which include commitment
driving actions to realize long-term environmental benefits, to help identify and evaluate qualified suppliers, promote best practices on ourvalue chain, and serve as a communication and improvement tool on enhancing CSR perspective on the supply chain among the industry.

Adaptation Impacted There are discussions about introducing carbon pricing in many countries, and since Bridgestone has facilities in over 20 countries, there is aandpossibility of increasing operational cost. In Japan’s case, the actual impact is estimated 951000 yen per 1 yen increase in tax rate. Since
mitigation
this risk impact is not small, Bridgestone encourages energy efficient operations such as fuel conversions, LED introduction, etc. to reduce
activities
CO2 emissions.
Investment Impacted By introducing new technologies Bridgestone encourages providing products and services which can contribute to reducing CO2 emissions,in R&Dsuch as fuel-efficient tires.. There is a possibility of sales decrease in case of becoming less competitive because of a delay in technology
development. Since this risk impact is big, Bridgestone invests in R&D for eco-products/services, alternative materials in case of material
shortage caused from climate-change. The entire research and development expense of the Global Group totalled 103.5 billion yen per year
in 2018. Among that expense, tire’s research and development expenses totalled 86.7 billion yen in 2018.
Operations Impacted There is a risk of rubber supply shortage as the climate pattern changes in regions where para rubber tree grows and rubber production
efficiency worsen. It can lead to lower profit because of higher rubber procurement cost. Since this risk impact is significant, Bridgestone has
been promoting research and development on alternative resources in other climatic zones aimed at easing the overconcentration of natural
rubber-producing areas in Southeast Asia. The entire research and development expenses on Global Group basis, including development ofalternative resources such as Guayule and Russian Dandelion, totalled 103.5 billion yen per year in 2018.
Other,
pleasespecify

C2.6

CDP

Pleaseselect(C2.6) Describe where and how the identified risks and opportunities have been factored into your financial planning
process.
Relevance Description
Revenues

Impacted

In case climate change becomes worse and/or related regulation(s) becomes strict, sales of vehicles and demand for tires will beaffected This is one major risk for Bridgestone's revenue. It is also expected as opportunity that revenue from eco-products/services (i.e.
our ECOPIA brand tires) is increased according to market changing to low-carbon. The potential of financial impact is estimated 30.51
billion yen per 1% of our sales is increased by taking the opportunity or decreased by occurrence of the risk.

Operatingcosts

Impacted

In case of rubber supply shortage as climate pattern changes in regions where para rubber trees grow or getting rubber production
efficiency worse, rubber procurement cost becomes high. The actual impact is estimated 5.22 billion yen worldwide for every yen rise perkilogram of whole raw material for our production including natural and synthetic rubber, based on 2018 production level. Since this risk
impact is significant, Bridgestone has a Global Sustainable Procurement Policy, which include commitment driving actions to realize
long-term environmental benefits, to help identify and evaluate qualified suppliers, promote best practices on our value chain, and serve
as a communication and improvement tool on enhancing CSR perspective on the supply chain among the industry.

Capital
Impacted
expenditures/ capital
allocation

The entire research and development expense of the Global Group including costs for developing eco-related technology (i.e.
developing tires with low rolling resistance), machines/equipment (i.e. tire building machine with low energy consumption) etc. totalled
103.5 billion yen per year in 2018. Among that expense, tire’s research and development expenses totalled 86.7 billion yen in 2018.
Expenses and investments mainly for introducing equipment for energy saving, including upgrading them, at Bridgestone plants
amounted to 4,079 million yen in 2018.

Acquisitions Impacted
anddivestments

To increase sales of products including fuel efficient tires which contributes to CO2 reduction while driving in the market, expansion ofsales channel could be a strong option. In 2018, Bridgestone announced the full share acquisition of the UK automotive service provider
ETB - a leading service provider including tire sales in the south-west of Britain. In addition, Bridgestone has focus on the solution
business, represented by the newly launched strategy named “Bridgestone T&DPaaS (Tire & Diversified products as a Solution)”. Our
solution business has contributed and will contribute to customer’s safety, efficiency productivity on their utilization of mobility including
fuel saving by fuel efficient product, CO2 reduction of our manufacturing by retread tires.. To promote this new strategy, we utilize M&A ifnecessary. As example, Bridgestone’s subsidiary Bridgestone Europe NV/SA has announced its acquisition of TomTom Telematics, a
digital fleet solutions business, for a cash consideration of 910 million euro (114 billion yen) in 2019.

Access tocapital

Impacted

Good result of external evaluation against Bridgestone from ESG perspective makes Bridgestone easier or better access to capital byincreasing investors' and lenders' confidence that the company's climate-related risks are appropriately assessed and managed. As of
2018, Bridgestone obtained relatively good score on some of representative index such as CDP, DJSI and these results brought us
more opportunities to access to capital. A one-yen increase in the stock price per share would result in total increase of corporate value
approximately 760 million yen as of December 31, 2018. It brings easier access to capital such as issuance of new shares.

Assets

Impacted

Introducing highly efficient equipment to manufacturing facilities is one important measure for CO2 reduction and we have promoted andwill promote this. As an example, in 2018 Bridgestone’s Turkish affiliate BRISA (Brisa Bridgestone Sabancı Lastik Sanayi ve TicaretA.Ş.) established a new manufacturing facility for radial tires in Aksaray Province, Turkey with an investment amounted to 300 million
USD. This new plant achieved 30% energy saving and contributes to our manufacturing with less CO2 emission.

Liabilities

Not yetimpacted

Bridgestone has an option to increase corporate liabilities for introducing machines/equipment to produce eco-products or reducing
resource consumption in future. Additionally, in case carbon tax/carbon pricing is newly introduced or tightened, financial impact will be
realized. In that sense, it could be “potential liabilities”. For example, if Japan carbon tax rate increase, financial impact will be approx.
951 thousand yen/1 yen increase in the tax rate. In addition, on the Emission Trading Scheme in EU, reduction of free allowance for tire
industry by transition to phase IV (from 2021-) might be financial impact for our manufacturing facilities in EU.

Other

Pleaseselect

C3. Business Strategy

C3.1(C3.1) Are climate-related issues integrated into your business strategy?
Yes

C3.1a
(C3.1a) Does your organization use climate-related scenario analysis to inform your business strategy?
Yes, qualitative

C3.1c
CDP

(C3.1c) Explain how climate-related issues are integrated into your business objectives and strategy.
i) How the strategy has been influenced
All global decision making regarding environment, including climate change, is carried out by the Global GCEC. Members of thecommittee are composed of an executive officer in charge of CSR and representatives of all regions and functions. Important
decisions made by GCEC are reported to the Global EXCO , Bridgestone’s body of global business execution, and based on the
management plan finalized at Global EXCO, Strategic Business Units (SBUs) reflect it in each Year Mid-term Management Plan.
From viewpoint of our countermeasure against climate change, Bridgestone established the “Environmental Mission Statement” tocontribute in aspects of circular economy, biodiversity and low carbon society (including long-term target to reduce over 50% of our
CO2 emission by 2050 and beyond), as a part of “the Bridgestone Essence framework” that is our corporate philosophy. From theviewpoint of contribution through solving climate-related issues is always incorporated into all our activities including planning andaddressing of strategy.

ii) Explanation of whether business strategy links to an emissions reductions target or energy reduction target
Bridgestone business strategy links to Environmental long-term vision and mid-term target including emissions reductions target.
Specifically, the long-term target is to reduce over 50% of our CO2 emission by 2050 and beyond, and the mid-term target is to
reduce our CO2 emissions per sales from operations and products’ after-use by 35 percent vs 2005 by 2020. Global Environmental
Working Group summarizes progress of CO2 emissions reduction target and next strategies to achieve the target and reports to
GCEC. GCEC then report to Global EXCO, and Global EXCO finalizes a management plan taking into account the report.

iii) The most substantial business decisions
In Feb.2018, Bridgestone issued the Global Sustainable Procurement Policy which is available in 12 languages,
implemented/governed/enforced regionally, and applicable to all purchased materials/services/all suppliers globally. Climate change
is defined as one of the requirements in the policy.
Bridgestone had already announced its goal of “100% Sustainable Materials” for 2050 and beyond as its long-term environmental
vision. Challenge for its achievement will not be simple, nor can Bridgestone achieve it alone, especially on issues like climatechange which require cooperation on entire value chain. In such situation, this policy is established to help identify and evaluate
qualified suppliers, promote best practices, and serve as a communication and improvement tool for the industry.
Bridgestone expects the policy works for such purposes and all of its Suppliers will recognize the importance of sustainableprocurement and work with the company to implement appropriate practices to create value for all Stakeholders.
For reference, 98 percent (more than 1,600) of the company’s Tier 1 tire material suppliers acknowledge the policy as of March 2019.

iv) Aspects of climate change influenced the strategy (e.g. need for adaptation, regulatory changes, or opportunities to develop green
business);
Need for adaptation influences Bridgestone strategy such as developing alternative material in case of material shortage caused byclimate change. Opportunities to develop green business also influences strategies such as development of tires that contribute to
reduction of CO2 emissions from driving an automobile (through reduced rolling and air resistance). In 2018, we succeeded
developing and started to provide new ECOPIA tires which can contribute to reducing CO2 emissions from driving with other highperformance such as wet and life.

v) The most important components of the short-term strategy
Bridgestone defines the short term to be affected by climate change as the period from the present up to 2020.
-Achievement of CO2 emission reduction targets throughout the whole Group, setting 2020 as the target year, with 2005 as thebaseline. We back-casted and drew up these targets from long-term environmental vision, which are ideal conditions in 2050.

CDP

-Achievement in reduction of GHG emissions mainly by the improvement in production efficiency and reduction of raw material
losses at plants with an eye to regulatory compliance and acquisition of emission rights-Product development complying with product regulations and grading of each country-Re-examination of product structure and line-up due to shifting consumer tendencies associated with climate change.
-Needs of consumers, local residents and others in regard to climate change initiatives. In particular, acceleration of development
and expansion of sales of fuel-efficient tires.

vi) The most important components of the long-term strategy
Bridgestone defines the long term to be affected by climate change as the period from the present up to 2050.
-Strengthening initiatives toward establishing a more sustainable society according to the Bridgestone Group’s Environmental
Mission Statement.
-As initiatives for realizing a low-carbon society, globally-agreed long-term target that contributes to reducing GHG emissions of thewhole world by at least 50% in the year 2050 and beyond.
-Re-examination of production sites controlled by the changes in weather conditions and local regulations-Development of lightweight products that consider changes in supplies and reserves of raw material resources-Development of fuel-efficient tires for which materials are controlled at nano levelvii) How this is gaining the company strategic advantage over competitors.
Our strategic advantages over competitors are as follows.
-Research and development capabilities for raw materials such as development of biomass-derived synthetic rubber and solutions
for controlling diseases and pests of rubber trees-Strategic planning from a long-term view up to 2050 based on long-term environmental vision-Planning and implementation of efficient and effective CO2 emission reduction measures by having own sites in the entire supply
chain from in-house production sites for raw materials to production sites and sales within the Groupviii) How the Paris Agreement has influenced the business strategy
We are aware of Paris Agreement aiming to reach net zero CO2 emissions, considering necessity of revision of strategies toward
long-term environmental vision. In addition, it is necessary to monitor and respond to social trend since there is a possibility of
establishment of measures such as carbon tax, to achieve each country’s reduction target based on Paris Agreement.

C3.1d

CDP

(C3.1d) Provide details of your organization’s use of climate-related scenario analysis.
Climate- Details
relatedscenarios
2DS
IEA 450

1. Purpose Extraction of climate risks to incorporate into Mid-term policy and long-term strategy 2. Time horizon We conducted scenario analysis withbusiness projections as of 2030 because we did the analysis as a part of the study to consider mid-term target towards 2030 when is the target year of
the SDGs. 3. Boundary Global tire business as our core segment 4. Scenario identification We selected 2 degree / 4 degree scenarios to clarify
climate risks widely on overall aspects (including procurement, manufacturing, logistics etc. not limiting to our product/service). We consider the 2
scenarios would be appropriate representatives of contrast viewpoints of “low carbon society” and society where climate change actualizes due toincreasing of carbon emission. 5. Methodology 1)List climate risks on the scenarios widely 2)Estimate financial impacts of the risks with the following
inputs and their future prediction -Financial information (Sales, cost, operating profit, capital expenditure etc.) -Non-financial information (CO2emission, energy consumption, material consumption, water intake etc.) -External information(Carbon price/tax, price of renewable energy, material,water etc.) 3)Evaluate importance of each risk based on the impacts and probability 6. Assumption on the analysis 1) On the 2 degree scenario, we
assume that physical impact such as flood, water shortage caused by climate change won’t be significant impact driver so the risks to focus is limited tostrong rise of social demand and stricter policy. 2) On the 4 degree scenario, we assume that GHG emission will be kept high due to insufficient
climate policy and/or social actions. Therefore, the risks to focus are limited to physical impact caused by high temperature, flood, hurricane, drought
etc. 3) On both scenarios, we assume that we won’t conduct any particular countermeasures for the climate risks. 7.Results and implications tobusiness objectives / strategy We found the following risks are especially important for us on each scenario. <2 degree scenario> - Increased costespecially on manufacturing due to introduction of carbon pricing / tax globally - Increased price of natural rubber caused by stronger demand for forest
protection and shortage of its supply - Increased demand for products with lower CO2 emission (brought by low rolling resistance, retread etc.) andinvestment on technologies to achieve it <4 degree scenario> - Increased price of natural rubber caused by lower yield and supply due to abnormal
weather - Damage and/or interruption on operation of manufacturing sites by sever and frequent weather disasters - Reduced revenue from winter tirescaused by snowfall reduction According to the analysis, not taking any action (especially on the important risks above) will end in financial impact suchas increasing of cost and the impact should be managed properly. At the same time, however, this result convinced us of appropriateness of ourstrategy/business model for the climate risks. We have already incorporated these risks into strategy and started action to mitigate them(e.g. CO2
reduction activity with mid-term/long-term target, development and introduction of fuel efficient tires, development of alternative materials of natural
rubber, introduction of the Global Procurement Policy for sustainable natural rubber etc.). As a business case, we recently announced new strategy
named “Bridgestone T&D PaaS” to meet revolution of mobility service. On this strategy, customers will obtain various benefits such as higher fuelefficiency and longer life of tire through our solution. In relation to the result of the scenario analysis, these benefits will contribute to saving
consumption of natural rubber and grasping growing demand for low CO2 emission product. To keep and improve adequacy of our climate-riskmanagement, we will continue further analysis of the risks and opportunities brought by climate change.

C4. Targets and performance

C4.1(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was active in the reporting year?
Both absolute and intensity targets

C4.1a(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Target reference number
Abs 1
Scope
Scope 1 +2 (market-based)% emissions in Scope
100
Targeted % reduction from base year
50
Base year
2005
Start year
2010

CDP

Base year emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
4570763
Target year
2050
Is this a science-based target?
No, but we anticipate setting one in the next 2 years% of target achieved
18.4
Target status
Underway
Please explain
Target of Bridgestone Long-term Vision is to contribute to globally-agreed target (over 50% reduction of CO2 emissions). The
globally-agreed target currently refers to agreement of G8 in Toyako summit in 2008, to reduce at least 50% global GHG
emissions.
Target reference number
Abs 2
Scope
Other, please specify (CO2 emission excess our contribution)
The second absolute target covers the CO2 emission amount by operations and products ’ after-use excess our contribution fromavoided emissions when our customers use the tires by improving fuel efficiency of our tires.
% emissions in Scope
100
Targeted % reduction from base year
100
Base year
2005
Start year
2010
Base year emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
15733000
Target year
2020
Is this a science-based target?
No, but we anticipate setting one in the next 2 years% of target achieved
95
Target status
Underway
Please explain
The Bridgestone Group is working to achieve its mid-term targets to reduce the volume of CO2 emissions over the entire lifecycleof a tire (15,733kt-CO2 in 2005). Considering the value when CO2 emissions from operations and products’ after-use are offset bycontribution of CO2 reduction at usage stage, the reduction in 2018 was 95% (compared to 2005). We are continuing activities witha dual approach aimed at achieving that contribution to CO2 reduction during use exceeds CO2 emissions from our operations andproducts’ after-use by 2020.

C4.1b

CDP

(C4.1b) Provide details of your emissions intensity target(s) and progress made against those target(s).
Target reference number
Int 1
Scope
Other, please specify (Scope 1+2+3)
The target covers Scope 1+2(Market-based method + location-based method) + 3（ Purchased goods & services, Upstream
transportation & distribution, Downstream transportation and distribution, End-of-life treatment of sold products, Upstream leased
assets）% emissions in Scope
100
Targeted % reduction from base year
35
MetricMetric tons CO2e per unit revenue
Base year
2005
Start year
2010
Normalized base year emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)585
Target year
2020
Is this a science-based target?
No, but we anticipate setting one in the next 2 years% of target achieved
95.5
Target status
Underway
Please explain
Focusing on the lifecycle of the Group’s products, we are working to reduce sales intensity of CO2 emitted in the manufacturing
process from raw material procurement to production, logistics, and products’ after-use. CO2 intensity of the base year is 585
tCO2/hundred million yen. Individual targets/measures are considered by each business division for achieving our overall objective,
and progress is being made toward the objective. The results thereof are compiled at the Corporate Communication Division andthe status of objective achievement is reviewed at Global EXCO.
% change anticipated in absolute Scope 1+2 emissions-12% change anticipated in absolute Scope 3 emissions
-12

C4.2

CDP

(C4.2) Provide details of other key climate-related targets not already reported in question C4.1/a/b.
TargetEngagement with suppliers
KPI – Metric numerator
Acknowledgment of our new Global Sustainable Procurement Policy by suppliers
KPI – Metric denominator (intensity targets only)
Base year
2018
Start year
2018
Target year
2019
KPI in baseline year
0
KPI in target year
100
% achieved in reporting year
98
Target Status
New
Please explain*The number (98%) filled in "% achieved in reporting year" is as of Mar.2019 and result of the company’s Tier 1 tire material
suppliers In Feb. 2018, Bridgestone Group introduced a new Global Sustainable Procurement Policy, which reflects ourcommitment to creating a thriving and sustainable supply chain including natural rubber. This new procurement policy focuses on
Sustainable Procurement Practices incorporating environmentally responsible procurement including measures for climate change,
reduction of GHG emission as well as the use of energy as one of four major areas. As an immediate first step, Bridgestone willprioritize working closely with its employees, suppliers and customers and other industry experts to implement the policy. Over the
next 18 months, Bridgestone will work with its suppliers and partners to ensure that they have received the policy and understand it.
Following acknowledgment of the policy, suppliers will then work with a third-party assessment.
Part of emissions targetNo
Is this target part of an overarching initiative?
No, it's not part of an overarching initiative

C4.3(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year? Note that this can include
those in the planning and/or implementation phases.
Yes

C4.3a

CDP

(C4.3a) Identify the total number of initiatives at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, theestimated CO2e savings.
Number of initiatives

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e (only for rows marked *)Under investigation

103

To be implemented*

136

6881

Implementation commenced*

69

5964

Implemented*

85

2715

Not to be implemented

0

C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Initiative type
Energy efficiency: Building fabricDescription of initiative
Other, please specify (Insulation and maintenance)
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
1002
Scope
Scope 1
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
32922000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
164609000
Payback period
4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Initiative type
Energy efficiency: Building services
Description of initiative
Other, please specify (HVAC, lighting etc.)
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
440
Scope
Scope 2 (market-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
19278000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
96389000
Payback periodCDP4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Initiative type
Energy efficiency: Processes
Description of initiative
Other, please specify (Switching fuel, optimizing process, etc.)
Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
1273
Scope
Scope 1
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
63908000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
319541000
Payback period
4 - 10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment

C4.3c(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?
MethodComment

Other
Relevant divisions report the emission costs and reduction benefits of CO2-related measures in the budgetary discussions, and investment decisions on(Pleasecapital expenditure are made for overall optimization. Management examines the business plans in the yearly mid-term plan, but carefully reviews
see theinvestment projects based on Investment Profit Criteria taking into account the CO2 emission costs and reduction benefits as the criteria at that time.
Comment Based on the EUA price, CO2 emissions are converted into monetary value and incorporated into the Investment Profit Criteria using the Discounted
column) Cash Flow method and used as one of the indexes for investment decisions. Both aspects of cost increase and decrease resulting from CO2 emission
increase/decrease are considered for decision making.

C4.5(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods and/or services as low-carbon products or do they enable a third party to
avoid GHG emissions?
Yes

C4.5a

CDP

(C4.5a) Provide details of your products and/or services that you classify as low-carbon products or that enable a third party
to avoid GHG emissions.
Level of aggregation
Company-wide
Description of product/Group of products
Fuel-efficient tires: Tires that have reduced tire rolling resistance which influences vehicle fuel efficiency. A wide-ranging line-up isavailable, from passenger car tires to tires for trucks/buses, and the design facilitates rolling resistance in order to enhance fuelefficiency. Specifically, through the use of NanoPro-Tech which exercises control over the fine structure of materials, we are striving
to reduce rolling resistance by reducing energy loss and controlling heat generation of tread rubber.
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they enable avoided emissions?
Avoided emissions
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate avoided emissions
Other, please specify (LCA method of the Japan)% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the reporting year
71
Comment
CO2 reduction using fuel-efficient tires during the product use stage. Reasons for the possibility of reduction: Improvement of tire
rolling efficiency can contribute to fuel efficiency improvement/CO2reduction when customers use one’s vehicles. Since the tire fuelefficiency or its standards differ by country, we approximate CO2 emissions. When we calculate based on "Tyre LCCO2
Calculation Guidelines" published by JATMA, due to reduction in tire rolling resistance, it contributed about 13,400,000 tons of CO2
reduction in 2018 compared with the products in 2005.
Level of aggregation
Group of products
Description of product/Group of products
Commercial roofing and building envelope solutions such as energy-saving polyiso insulations, roofing membranes, vegetativeroofing solutions, airtight building envelope systems, etc. which qualify for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED)
credits and contribute to healthy, high-performance construction.
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they enable avoided emissions?
Avoided emissions
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate avoided emissions
Other, please specify (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design(LEED))
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the reporting year
29
Comment
The percentage was estimated as the number of product line which contributes to "Energy & Atmosphere" category of the LEED
rating system divided by total number of product line of our subsidiary - "Firestone Building Products". As in their latest
sustainability report, 4 of 14 main product line contributes to the category. (12 of 14 contributes to at least one category.)

C5. Emissions methodology

C5.1

CDP

(C5.1) Provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2).
Scope 1
Base year start
January 1 2005
Base year end
December 31 2005
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
2303629
Comment
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start
January 1 2005
Base year end
December 31 2005
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)2267134
Comment

C5.2(C5.2) Select the name of the standard, protocol, or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope
1 and Scope 2 emissions.
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming, Superceded by
Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment)
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)

C6. Emissions data

C6.1

CDP

(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
1884902
Start date
January 1 2018
End date
December 31 2018
Comment

C6.2(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
Row 1​Scope 2, location-based​
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Scope 2, market-based
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Comment

C6.3(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Scope 2, location-based
2362089
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
2264331
Start date
January 1 2018
End date
December 31 2018
Comment

C6.4(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions
that are within your selected reporting boundary which are not included in your disclosure?
Yes

C6.4a

CDP

(C6.4a) Provide details of the sources of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions that are within your selected reporting boundary
which are not included in your disclosure.
SourceGHGs except CO2
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are not relevant
Explain why this source is excluded
At production sites in Japan and the Americas, GHGs except CO2 are collected but are excluded because emissions are minimal
relative to CO2.
SourceProduction sites with number of workers below 50 people and that is not the subject of accreditation of ISO14001
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are not relevant
Explain why this source is excluded
The reasons why production sites with number of workers below 50 people and are not the subject of accreditation of ISO14001,
are excluded is because their influence on the total is very limited.
SourceOffice/storages etc., nonproduction sites (supplementary facilities of plants are excluded)
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are not relevant
Explain why this source is excluded
Office energy is collected at major sites but excluded because emissions are minimal.
SourceCompany owned car
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are not relevant
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are not relevant
Explain why this source is excluded
Refilling company owned cars outside the premises is excluded because their influence on the total is very limited. (Refilling fuelwithin the premises is included in Scopes)

CDP

C6.5
(C6.5) Account for your organization’s Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.
Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
7979623
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the purchased amount of each raw material with CO2 emission factors for each raw material determinedby Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association calculation methods.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e856196
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the capital expenditures material with CO2 emission factors determined by Japanese Ministry of theEnvironment
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e571697
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the energy consumption with CO2 emission factors determined by DEFRA
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e446518Emissions calculation methodology[Ground transportation] Calculated by multiplying purchased amount of each raw material with CO2 emission factors for each raw
material determined by Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association calculation methods. [Marine transportation] The result for 2008 is
calculated based on the volume and distance of marine transportation with respect to the CO2 emission factors of the GHG protocol
for shipment. It is calculated as a ratio of the purchased raw materials for 2018 and 2008.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
CDPWaste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
183695Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the amount of waste generated with CO2 emission factors determined by Japanese Ministry of theEnvironment
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Business travel
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
18656
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the number of employees with CO2 emission factors determined by Japanese Ministry of theEnvironment
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
66129
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the number of employees with CO2 emission factors determined by Japanese Ministry of theEnvironment
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Explanation
Included in scope1 and scope2

CDP

Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
595022Emissions calculation methodology
CO2 per unit sales is calculated from CO2 emitted from a part of one’s own store and multiply it by total sales for proportional
allotment
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
3
Explanation
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
3627
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculate the power consumed during tire installation by multiplying installation power per tire by the number of tires sold.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e122699293
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated from our Tyre sales unit and CO2 emission per 1 tire when it used based on ”Tyre LCCO2 Calculation Guidelines Ver.
2.0" by The Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association, Inc.(JATMA) April 2012
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e2159969
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculated by multiplying the purchased quantity of each raw material with CO2 emission factors determined by Japan Rubber
Manufacturers Association calculation methods.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation

CDPDownstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Explanation
Bridgestone had no leased assets in 2018.
Franchises
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
90050
Emissions calculation methodology
Calculate by multiplying CO2 emission per typical shop by the number of franchise shops
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Explanation
Investments
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Explanation
Investments are not main business of Bridgestone.
Other (upstream)
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Explanation

CDPOther (downstream)
Evaluation status
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Explanation

C6.7(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization?
Yes

C6.7a
(C6.7a) Provide the emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization in metric tons CO2.
Row 1
Emissions from biologically sequestered carbon (metric tons CO2)
14267
Comment

C6.10

CDP

(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit
currency total revenue and provide any additional intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Intensity figure
0.00000114
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions)
4149234
Metric denominator
unit total revenue
Metric denominator: Unit total
3650111083000
Scope 2 figure used
Market-based% change from previous year
2.7
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason for change
Total CO2 emissions was decreased approximately 2.7% in 2018 comparing that of 2017 mainly for reduction in tire weight andenergy reduction at production sites and increasing of sales price, though some other factors such as change of exchange rate etc.
lowered the %.
Intensity figure
0.79443901
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions)
4149234
Metric denominator
Other, please specify (metric tonne of raw material)
Metric denominator: Unit total
5223000
Scope 2 figure used
Market-based% change from previous year
6
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason for change
Result of emission reduction activities

C7. Emissions breakdowns

C7.1(C7.1) Does your organization break down its Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type?
No

CDP

C7.2
(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/region.
Country/Region

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

United States of America

426740.78

Canada24789.1

Mexico120555.37

Costa Rica

13386.46

Argentina

18438.16

Brazil69511.74

France0Belgium

4424.07

Spain

48444.18

Poland14807.2

Italy28219.45

Hungary

12257.51

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland405.23

Turkey40931.5

South Africa

44147.24

Liberia

10343.89

Thailand237398.09

Indonesia

120839.44

Taiwan, Greater China

7742.19

India

20720.58

Australia

81.1

Malaysia

57.81

Philippines

54.5

Viet Nam

5858

China

66788.7

Japan541500.58

Russian Federation

6459.5

C7.3(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division

C7.3a(C7.3a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 1 emissions (metric ton CO2e)

Tire

1766666

Others118237

C7.5
CDP

(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/region.
Country/Region

Scope 2, locationbased (metric tons
CO2e)

Scope 2, marketPurchased and consumed
based (metric tons electricity, heat, steam orCO2e)cooling (MWh)Purchased and consumed low-carbon electricity, heat,steam or cooling accounted in market-based approach(MWh)

United States ofAmerica

643001.51

634857.26

1484306.35

111884.8

Canada19902.71

19902.71

133128.49

86473.94

Mexico64883.47

64883.47

139744.71

21347.35

Costa Rica

699.89699.8958324.1

57289.58

Argentina

17060.62

17060.62

45374

12350.72

Brazil30954.76

30954.76

257956.31

207262.85

France19511.42

24790.65

128544.34

17093.22

Belgium

2926.462990.1517034.11

2899.93

Spain

47204.6

494.74

192044.76

190818.51

Poland165988.39

175898.42304316.67

28043.11

Italy

1619.04

2007.884897.27398.15

Hungary21504.82

22491.28

78916.78

9193.81

United Kingdom ofGreat Britain andNorthern Ireland

280.65302.651008.82

188.65

Turkey70878.88

70878.88

152591.77

50183.1

South Africa

56832.1856832.18

60127.15

2629.69

Liberia

0

0

0

0

Thailand

228239.5

218524.58

537373.81

69988.21

Indonesia

79191.33

79191.33

108615.19

13913.03

Taiwan, Greater China

29606.02

29606.02

66414.16

1971.53

India

91655

91655

126281.35

20382.85

Australia

5690.41

5690.417500.211094.73

Malaysia

659.85659.851007.56135.63

Philippines

2694.29

2694.294440.89

1074.11

Viet Nam

14474.15

14474.15

32265.15

12599.17

China281501.8

280985.59522434.37

102993.64

Japan458726.45

409403.41

843557.28

127556.47

Russian Federation

6401.136401.1317890.25

3078.45

C7.6(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division

C7.6a(C7.6a) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Tires

2093394

2005845

Others268695258486

C7.9

CDP

(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to those of theprevious reporting year?
Decreased

C7.9a(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) and for each of themspecify how your emissions compare to the previous year.
Change in Direction
emissions of change(metric
tons
CO2e)

Emissions
Please explain calculation
value(percentage)

Change in
45020.12
renewableenergyconsumption

Decreased 1.06

Our 4 plants in Spain have introduced renewable electricity. Scope2 emission of the 4 plants in 2017 was
45020.121tCO2e in total. Therefore, the same amount which is equivalent to 1.06% was reduced from 2017.
(-45020.121/4257657) * 100 = -1.06%(i.e. an 1.06% decrease in emissions) *Previous year(2017) Scope 1+ 2 emission was 4257657 tCO2e

Otheremissions
reduction
activities

Decreased 0.06

We reduced 2,715 tons as a result of energy-saving activities in 2018. Since Scope 1 and 2 emissions were
4,257,657 tons the previous year, that represents a 0.06% reduction from 2017. (-2715/4257657 ) * 100 = 0.06% (i.e. a 0.06% decrease in emissions) *Previous year(2017) Scope 1 + 2 emission was 4257657
tCO2e

2715

Divestment<Not
Applicable>

Acquisitions<Not
Applicable>

Mergers<Not
Applicable>

Change in
output<Not
Applicable>

Change in
81909.42
methodology

Decreased 1.92

Change inboundary<Not
Applicable>

Change inphysicaloperatingconditions<Not
Applicable>

Unidentified<Not
Applicable>

Other

21221.55

Increased

0.5

Electricity emission factors was updated to the latest figures. The values on the left was difference between
Scope1 + 2(Market-based) emission in 2018 with the latest electricity emission factors and that with thefactors of previous year. (-81909.42/4257657 ) * 100 = -1.92% (i.e. an -1.92% decrease in emissions)*Introduction of renewable electricity in 4 Spanish plants written in the first column was excluded from thiscalculation *Previous year(2017) Scope 1 + 2 emission was 4257657 tCO2e

Due to changes in the composition of energy sources, change in production volume, etc. (21221.55/4257657) * 100 = 0.50% (i.e. an 0.50% increase in emissions) *Previous year (2017) Scope 1 + 2 emission was
4257657 tCO2e

C7.9b
(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-based Scope 2 emissions figure
or a market-based Scope 2 emissions figure?
Market-based

C8. Energy

CDP

C8.1
(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

C8.2(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this energy-related activity
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

No

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling

No

Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling

Yes

C8.2a
(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
Heating value

MWh from renewablesources

MWh from non-renewablesources

Total MWh

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)

LHV (lower heating
value)

32983

75518637584846

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity<Not Applicable>

115277237763234929095

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not
Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam<Not Applicable>

0397001397001

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not
Applicable>

Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewableenergy<Not Applicable>

399<Not Applicable>

399

Total energy consumption<Not Applicable>

118615411725187

12911341

C8.2b(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this fuel application
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of heat

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of steam

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of coolingNo

Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation

Yes

C8.2c
CDP

(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Motor Gasoline
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
14788.58
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
14788.58
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Kerosene
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
5315.08
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
5315.08
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
DieselHeating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
124901.25
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
62450.63
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat49960.5
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
CDP

12490.13
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Fuel Oil Number 4
Heating value
HHV (higher heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
95917.68
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
95917.68
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Fuel Oil Number 6
Heating value
HHV (higher heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
197781.06
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
197781.06
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
Heating value
HHV (higher heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
149140.7
CDPMWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
149140.7
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
420965.04
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat27293.15
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
109172.6
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
284499.29
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Town Gas
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1042416.55
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
84807.03
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
339228.11
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
618381.42
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
CDP

Natural Gas
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
4917218.81
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
892878.91
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
3571515.62
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
452824.28
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Coal
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
147312.41
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
147312.41
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Other, please specify (Carbon fuel oil)
Heating value
HHV (higher heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
436105.77
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
130481.97
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
305623.8
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
CDPMWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Wood Pellets
Heating value
LHV (lower heating value)
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
32983.12
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam
32983.12
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment

C8.2d(C8.2d) List the average emission factors of the fuels reported in C8.2c.
Coal
Emission factor
2.13
Unit
metric tons CO2e per metric ton
Emission factor source
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition):Anthracite, Brown coalbriquettes, Sub bituminous coal, Other bituminous coalComment
DieselEmission factor
2.67
Unit
kg CO2e per liter
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment

CDP

Fuel Oil Number 4
Emission factor
2.71
Unit
kg CO2e per liter
Emission factor source
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming, Superceded by
Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment)
Comment
We put information about Heavy Oil A as Fuel Oil No.4
Fuel Oil Number 6
Emission factor
3
Unit
kg CO2e per liter
Emission factor source
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming, Superceded by
Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment)
Comment
We put information about Heavy Oil B/C as Fuel Oil No.6
Kerosene
Emission factor
2.49
Unit
kg CO2e per liter
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)
Emission factor
2.71
Unit
metric tons CO2e per metric ton
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment

CDPLiquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG)
Emission factor
3
Unit
metric tons CO2e per metric ton
Emission factor source
Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming, Superceded by
Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment)
Comment
Motor Gasoline
Emission factor
2.27
Unit
kg CO2e per liter
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment
Including Biogasoline
Natural Gas
Emission factor
1.89
Unit
metric tons CO2e per m3
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment
Town Gas
Emission factor
2.23
Unit
metric tons CO2e per m3
Emission factor source"Facilities in Japan: Japan Ministry of the Environment, Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global
Warming, Superceded by Revision of the Act on Promotion of Global Warming Countermeasures (2005 Amendment) Others:The
Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)"
Comment

CDP

Wood Pellets
Emission factor0
Unit
metric tons CO2e per metric ton
Emission factor source
GHG protocol "Emission Factors from Cross-Sector Tools"
Comment
According to the GHG protocol "Emission Factors from Cross-Sector Tools, the emission factor is 1.7472. But we consider thebiomass fuel as renewable/low carbon source and exclude from calculation of the Scope1.
Other
Emission factor
3.3
Unit
metric tons CO2e per metric ton
Emission factor source
Measured value of carbon content ratio of the fuelComment
Information of "carbon fuel oil" is shown in this row

C8.2e(C8.2e) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and cooling your organization has generated and consumed in thereporting year.
Total Gross
generation (MWh)Generation that is consumed by the Gross generation fromorganization (MWh)renewable sources (MWh)Generation from renewable sources that isconsumed by the organization (MWh)Electricity 706597.68

672540.46

399

399

Heat

1230336.41

1230336.41

0

0

Steam

4166240.18

4166240.18

26177

26177

Cooling

0

0

0

0

C8.2f
(C8.2f) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a low-carbon
emission factor in the market-based Scope 2 figure reported in C6.3.
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Off-grid energy consumption from an on-site installation or through a direct line to an off-site generator owned by another company
Low-carbon technology typeSolar PV
Hydropower
Region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
Asia Pacific
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
371
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per MWh)0

CDP

Comment
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Off-grid energy consumption from an on-site installation or through a direct line to an off-site generator owned by another company
Low-carbon technology typeSolar PV
Region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
Europe
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
29
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per MWh)0Comment
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Off-grid energy consumption from an on-site installation or through a direct line to an off-site generator owned by another company
Low-carbon technology type
Biomass (including biogas)
Region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
Latin America
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
32983.12
Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per MWh)0Comment
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Contract with suppliers or utilities ( e.g. green tariff), supported by energy attribute certificates
Low-carbon technology type
Other low-carbon technology, please specify (Breakdown of the source is unknown)
Region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
Europe
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
190032Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per MWh)0Comment
4 facilities in Spain purchases renewable electricity with certificates.
Basis for applying a low-carbon emission factor
Grid mix of renewable electricity
Low-carbon technology type
Other low-carbon technology, please specify (Breakdown of the source is unknown)
Region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
Other, please specify (All regions)
MWh consumed associated with low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling
962740Emission factor (in units of metric tons CO2e per MWh)
0.461469

CDP

Comment
As for purchased electricity without certificates, portion generated by renewable energy was calculated confirming renewableenergy ratio with public data such as IEA, individual confirmation with suppliers etc. The Emission factor was calculated as below.
Emission factor = Total CO2 emission by purchased electricity RE ratio of which is available(MWh) / (Low carbon electricity RE ratioof which is available(MWh) + Non-Low carbon electricity(MWh)) = 2186929/(962740+3776323)=0.461469

C9. Additional metrics

C9.1(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.

C10. Verification

C10.1(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Verification/assurance status
Scope 1

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 3

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

C10.1a(C10.1a) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 1 and/or Scope 2 emissions andattach the relevant statements.
Scope
Scope 1
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
AS_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
Page/ section reference
Please refer to the page.3/3 of "AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf" for the actual value
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)

CDP

100
Scope
Scope 2 location-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
AS_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
Page/ section reference
Please refer to the page.3/3 of "AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf" for the actual value
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100
Scope
Scope 2 market-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
AS_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
Page/ section reference
Please refer to the page.3/3 of "AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf" for the actual value
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1b

CDP

(C10.1b) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 3 emissions and attach the relevant
statements.
Scope
Scope 3- all relevant categories
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Attach the statement
AS_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf
Page/section reference
Please refer to the page.3/3 of "AS_GHG_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf" for the actual value
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3

C10.2(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related information reported in your CDP disclosure other than the emissions figures
reported in C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
Yes

C10.2a(C10.2a) Which data points within your CDP disclosure have been verified, and which verification standards were used?
Disclosure
moduleverification
relates toData verified

Verification Please explain
standard

C8. Energy

Other, please
specify (Please
see the column
below)ISAE 3000

Total energy consumption, Energy consumption (fuel) including fuel from renewable sources, Energy
consumption (purchased electricity) including electricity from renewable sources, Energy consumption(purchased steam), energy consumption (self-generated renewable electricity from non-fuel sources; solar, etc.)
AS_BS-2018_en_signed.pdf

C11. Carbon pricing

C11.1(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS, Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
Yes

C11.1aCDP

(C11.1a) Select the carbon pricing regulation(s) which impacts your operations.
EU ETS
Japan carbon tax

C11.1b
(C11.1b) Complete the following table for each of the emissions trading systems in which you participate.
EU ETS% of Scope 1 emissions covered by the ETS
5.3
Period start date
January 1 2018
Period end date
December 31 2018
Allowances allocated99328
Allowances purchased
3508
Verified emissions in metric tons CO2e112288
Details of ownership
Facilities we own and operate
Comment

C11.1c(C11.1c) Complete the following table for each of the tax systems in which you participate.
Japan carbon tax
Period start date
January 1 2018
Period end date
December 31 2018
% of emissions covered by tax
28.72
Total cost of tax paid
156493789
Comment% of emission covered by tax was calculated by Scope1 emission in Japan divided by global Scope1 emission. And total cost of
tax paid was calculated by Scope1 emission in Japan multiplied Japan Carbon tax rate(289yen/tCO2e) *In addition, the carbon tax
is indirectly affect electricity price in the Scope 2.

C11.1dCDP(C11.1d) What is your strategy for complying with the systems in which you participate or anticipate participating?

As our strategy for carbon pricing system, we intend to minimize additional cost by CO2 emission and such system by promoting
CO2 emission reduction actively and steadily on global basis. Representative measures are as followings.
- Energy saving initiatives at production sites including active introduction of highly efficient equipment to new facility(e.g. As example
in 2018, Bridgestone’s Turkish affiliate Brisa Bridgestone Sabancı Lastik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.(BRISA) established a new
manufacturing facility for radial tires in Aksaray Province, Turkey with investment which amounted to 300 million USD. This new plantachieved 30% energy saving and contributes to our manufacturing with less CO2 emission.)- Energy saving initiatives at business offices(e.g. turning off lights and air-controls when unnecessary)- Enlightenment activities to raise employees’ environmental awareness(e.g. continuing education not only by on-site training but also
by utilizing e-leaning.)

C11.2(C11.2) Has your organization originated or purchased any project-based carbon credits within the reporting period?
No

C11.3
(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal price on carbon?
Yes

C11.3a(C11.3a) Provide details of how your organization uses an internal price on carbon.
Objective for implementing an internal carbon price
Drive energy efficiency
Drive low-carbon investment
GHG Scope
Scope 1
Scope 2
Application
Applied to decisions of investment for equipment
Actual price(s) used (Currency /metric ton)
1989
Variance of price(s) used
If the actual price is available in each regional system, the price is applied preferentially. If not, the price above is utilized commonly
inside company as a guide and reviewed once a year.
Type of internal carbon priceShadow priceImpact & implication
Internal guidelines: Our Investment Profit Criteria stipulate consideration of carbon emission impacts (increase or reduction) ofinvestments are to be integrated as cost when making judgments for strategic investment projects. The cost of emission impacts is
to be calculated as the price of an emissions credit unit.

CDP

C12. Engagement

C12.1(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on climate-related issues?
Yes, our suppliers
Yes, our customers
Yes, other partners in the value chain

C12.1aCDP

(C12.1a) Provide details of your climate-related supplier engagement strategy.
Type of engagement
Engagement & incentivization (changing supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes
Run an engagement campaign to educate suppliers about climate change
Other, please specify (Engaging suppliers to take the third party assessment on sustainability including environment/climate change
related aspect)% of suppliers by number
100% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)100% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
6
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
Coverage: In Feb.2018, Bridgestone issued the Global Sustainable Procurement Policy which is applicable to all purchasedmaterials and services, as well as all suppliers globally. Rationale for the coverage: The journey towards “100% sustainable
materials” which is one of the Bridgestone’s goals for 2050 and beyond and includes aspect of mitigation of climate related impact,
will not be simple, nor can Bridgestone achieve it alone. This policy is to help identify and evaluate qualified suppliers, promote bestpractices, and serve as a communication and improvement tool for the industry. Bridgestone expects all of its suppliers torecognize the importance of Sustainable Procurement, and work with the Company to implement appropriate practices to create
value for all stakeholders. Note: During the development of the policy, Bridgestone gained insights from external stakeholders,
including international consultants, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), materials suppliers, natural rubber farmers, and key
customers to ensure the policy reflects industry standards and best practices. In addition, the policy is supported by a global
implementation and communication plan. Available in 12 languages, the policy will be implemented, governed and enforced
regionally. As an immediate first step, Bridgestone will prioritize working closely with its employees, suppliers and customers andother industry experts to implement the policy.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success"The four major areas are impacted throughout Bridgestone’s supply chain: “Transparency”, “Compliance”,“QCD(Quality/Cost/Delivery) and Innovation”, “Sustainable Procurement Practices” incorporating environmentally responsible
procurement including measures for climate change, reduction of GHG emission as well as the use of energy. Through a 2018
partnership with EcoVadis, a leading provider of sustainability, risk and performance ratings for global supply chains, Bridgestone
conducted assessing suppliers’ current sustainability practices, as well as the possible support needed to improve performance.
This activity could be an opportunity for suppliers to confirm and improve their actions for preventing climate change further. As an
example of the indicator to confirm the progress, Bridgestone focuses on the ratio of acknowledgement of the policy by suppliers.
As of March 2019, the ratio has been increased to 98 percent (more than 1,600) of the company’s Tier 1 tire material suppliers andthe majority of them are in the process of completing third-party assessments with EcoVadis.
Comment

C12.1b

CDP

(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Type of engagement
Collaboration & innovation
Details of engagement
Run a campaign to encourage innovation to reduce climate change impacts% of customers by number
100% Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
15
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagementI) In the development of new vehicle models by automakers, which are our business partners, the development and delivery of fuelefficient tires that contribute to the reduction of fuel consumption in cooperation with automakers leads to the reduction of GHG
emissions. In addition, we cooperate in calculating the emissions of automakers and contribute to reductions in the life cycle bycooperating in the GHG emission survey of automakers through the CDP supply chain program. Because we promote suchactivities with all automakers, 100% is input into "size of engagement" ii) By improving the rolling resistance of tires used in
automobiles, we contribute to automakers’ efforts to lower fuel consumption during the use of their products.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
Improvement of fuel efficiency of tires brings CO2 reduction from vehicles. The direct impact of the engagement is calculated by the
result of tire units sold to the automakers multiplied by the average of CO2 emission per tire. And the technology which is developedby the engagement can be applied tires which are sold directly to end-users for their replacement needs. From this perspective, theengagement has further potential to contribute CO2 reduction. From this viewpoint, we keep going on improvement of fuelefficiency of tires with corporate-wide and mid-term target on 25% reduction of rolling resistance which affects fuel efficiency vs2005 until 2020. The progress towards the target is the measure of success for Bridgestone. As of 2018, the Group achieved 21%
reduction which is equivalent to 13,400,000t-CO2 of our Scope3(Category11) reduction from 2005.

C12.1c(C12.1c) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with other partners in the value chain.

On tire business, sales of fuel efficient tire are one of important activities to contribute to CO2 reduction. In addition, to enhance salesof such tires by telling their value to customers appropriately, it is necessary to cooperate with tire dealers as our important partners.
Specifically, we as a tire manufacture, have been making effort to let fuel efficiency of tires visible both to the dealers and customers
by supporting introduction of ECO labelling system as tire industry. Display on labels supported by such system is beneficial andhelpful for dealers when they recommend fuel efficient tires to their customer and when customers make decision on their purchase.
And, of course, we have been promoting enrichment of such tires in our product portfolio for actual benefit for both of them.
In case that we calculate under the condition of sold number of replacement tires listed in catalog for passenger cars in Japan, 57% of
those sold tires are conformable to the environmental product declaration in accordance with external standard by Japan Automobile
Tyre Manufacturers Association(JATMA). From climate-change perspective, coexistence of low rolling resistance which contributes
low CO2 emission and other performances like WET performance which supports safety is key challenge for our tire development.
Therefore, the number of our ECO products which achieves high quality in such areas in the same time is one of our measure of
success.
As a case study, Bridgestone completed development of REGNO GR-XII in 2018 and launched in Feb. 2019 as a flagship of comfort
tire. Because all sizes of this new product are labelled through the system above, satisfying the criteria, dealers and customers caneasily recognize the product has high wet performance and low rolling resistance with other greatly balanced performance as thefeature of the product.

C12.3

CDP

(C12.3) Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence public policy on climate-related issues
through any of the following?
Trade associations

C12.3b
(C12.3b) Are you on the board of any trade associations or do you provide funding beyond membership?
Yes

C12.3cCDP

(C12.3c) Enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation.
Trade association
The Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association (JRMA)
Is your position on climate change consistent with theirs?
Consistent
Please explain the trade association’s position
After the commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (since 2013), JRMA has been working consistently to achieve the goal of
reducing CO2 in 2020 which has been set as a trade association’s target in line with the national policy calling for the ongoing
reduction of CO2. In addition, JRMA set the target for 2030 also in 2015. Based on the targets of industry groups including JRMA,
Japan’s reduction targets submitted to COP21 were drawn up. Every year, they give a follow-up report on the reduction status to
the government and steadily promoted activities to reduce the emission. According to the follow-up report which they issued in
October 2018, their CO2 emission intensity in 2017 has been improved and became 90.9% vs 2005.
How have you influenced, or are you attempting to influence their position?
At the Environmental Committee, Bridgestone leads industry activities and summarizes the opinions as the chairperson.
Trade association
The Japan Automobile Tyre Manufacturers Association, Inc. (JATMA)
Is your position on climate change consistent with theirs?
Consistent
Please explain the trade association’s position
JATMA is one of the major tire industry associations in the world, and has established the Tire Labelling System in 2010, and has
been contributing to increase the ratio of “Fuel Efficient Tires" in the market. (In the lifecycle of tire, CO2 emission in usage stage
consists of more than 80%) In 2015, JATMA compiled and announced the benefits of CO2 emission reduction through reduced
rolling resistance of passenger car tires from 2006 to 2012. In 2018, JATMA issued a report on the contribution of rolling resistancecoefficient(RRC) of tires for CO2 reduction. According to the report, CO2 emission per tire has been reduced by 13.9% in 2016,
compared to 2006.
How have you influenced, or are you attempting to influence their position?
Our employees have participated in various committees and presented our opinions. At the Environmental Committee, Bridgestoneleads industry activities and summarizes the opinions as the chairperson.
Trade association
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD)
Is your position on climate change consistent with theirs?
Consistent
Please explain the trade association’s position
Since 2006, the Tire Industry Project (TIP) under the umbrella of the World Business Council for Sustainable Development has
served as a voluntary joint-initiative undertaken by 11 global leading tire manufacturers, under the leadership of the CEOs, with an
aim to identify and address the potential human health and environmental impacts associated with tire development and use. TIP isa proactive organization that allows the industry’s leading companies to leverage their collective action in advancing sustainability
throughout the industry. In 2018, TIP conducted research on 2017 result of environmental KPIs for tire manufacturing such as CO2
emission and energy consumption for issuance of a report in 2019.
How have you influenced, or are you attempting to influence their position?
As one of the co-chair companies of the Tire Industry Project, Bridgestone is engaged in the visualization of the overall impact ofclimate change through discussions with other companies.

C12.3f

CDP

(C12.3f) What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are
consistent with your overall climate change strategy?
In order to ensure consistency, a special team of the Corporate Communication Division which belongs to Bridgestone’s
headquarters is in charge of communication and negotiation with external companies and organizations, uniformly handles
cooperation with industry groups. Important discussions with industry groups are reported to the Global Environment Working Groupand the Clobal CSR Enhancement Committee(GCEC), for review and to ensure consistency and representatives of Bridgestone’s
feedback into industry groups.

C12.4(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions
performance for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Publication
In voluntary sustainability report
StatusComplete
Attach the document
sr2018-2019.pdf
Page/Section reference
Governance: page 8 Strategy: pages 35-36 Risks&opportunities: page35:(Contribution to fuel efficiency) page 38(RiskManagement) Emission figures: page 49 Emission targets :page 35 Other metrics :page 35(Tire-Rolling Resistance Coefficient in
Reducing CO2 Emissions) page 49(Energy consumption in Environment-related Data) etc.
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Other metrics
Comment
Detail of our environmental and CSR related activities is written in the report.
Publication
In mainstream reports
StatusComplete
Attach the document
Asset Securities report.pdf
Page/Section reference
Each element related topics are included into the following pages: Governance: Pages 50-52(Explanation of our corporate
governance structure) Strategy: Pages 10-11(Overall corporate strategy), 24 (Introduction of fuel efficient tires) Risks &Opportunities: Pages 13-16(Corporate risks), Page 24(Opportunities shown as representative R&D topics)
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Comment
High-level description on our governance, strategy and risk&opportunities is included in the report.

CDP

C14. Signoff

C-FI(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional information or context that you feel is relevant to your organization's response.
Please note that this field is optional and is not scored.

C14.1(C14.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.

Row
1

CDP

Job title

Corresponding job category

Executive Vice President and Executive Officer Responsible for Global Public Relations, Government Relations andSustainability

Chief Sustainability Officer(CSO)