No.910-17/08/07

外航組合員各位
PSC 集中検査キャンペーン （パリ MOU／東京 MOU）
ポートステートコントロール（PSC）に関し、2017 年 9 月 1 日から 11 月 30 日までの 3 ヶ月間、パリ MOU（欧州・北大西洋地域）と東京 MOU（アジア・太平洋地域）が共同で集中検査キャンペーン（CIC）を行う旨の通知がありましたのでお知らせいたします。
今回の集中検査は航海の安全に関する部分に焦点があてられており、ECDIS（電子海図情報表示装置）、VDR（航海情報記録装置）、BNWAS（航海当直警報システム）、AIS（自動船舶識別装置）などの航海関係機器、とりわけ ECDIS に重きが置かれているようです。
検査の詳細については、別添の“Press release”及び “Questionnaire”をご参照く
ださい。
なお、ECDIS の取り扱い等に関しては、当組合のウェブサイトよりロスプリベンショ
ンガイド第 39 号「電子海図情報表示装置（ECDIS）」をご利用いただけますので、この機会にご活用ください。
各船舶のご安航を祈念いたします。
以上

日本船主責任相互保険組合
ロスプリベンション推進部
Tel:+81 3 3662 7229

Fax:+81 3 3662 7107

E-mail: lossprevention-dpt@piclub.or.jp
Website: https://www.piclub.or.jp
添付 1：パリ MOU 及び東京 MOU 連名の Press Release
添付 2：パリ MOU の Questionnaire
添付 3：東京 MOU の Questionnaire

Press release
31 July 2017

LAUNCH OF JOINT CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN ON
SAFETY OF NAVIGATION (SOLAS CH.V)
The Maritime Authorities of the Tokyo and the Paris Memoranda ofUnderstanding (MoU) on Port State Control will launch a joint Concentrated
Inspection Campaign (CIC) on SAFETY OF NAVIGATION.
The aim of the CIC is to check compliance with the applicable requirements ofthe SOLAS Convention, the overall status of the vessel’s navigation safety, andthe competency of crew involved in navigation operations.
This inspection campaign will be held for three months, commencing from 1
September 2017 and ending 30 November 2017. A ship will only be subject to one
inspection under this CIC during the period of the campaign.
Navigation equipment have always been major inspection items for PSC inspections.
The Tokyo MoU and the Paris MoU have conducted a joint CIC for SOLAS Chapter
V concerning safety of navigation in 2008. The regulations for navigation equipment
have undergone frequent changes according to a series of amendments to SOLAS
Chapter V (safety of navigation). Electronic Chart Display and Information System(ECDIS) have assisted watchkeepers to maintain navigation safety and reduce thenavigational workload since its application. Deficiencies relating to navigationequipment contribute a major proportion of the total deficiencies. From 2009 to 2016,a total of 174,559 deficiencies concerning safety of navigation were recorded,accounting for 15.27% of all deficiencies.
Port State Control Officers (PSCOs) will use a list of 12 questions to assure thatnavigation equipment carried onboard complies with the relevant statutory
certificates, the master and navigation officers are qualified and familiar with
operation of bridge equipment, especially ECDIS, and that navigation equipment isproperly maintained and functioning.
If deficiencies are found, actions by the port State may vary from recording a
deficiency and instructing the master to rectify it within a certain period of time to1

detaining the ship until the serious deficiencies have been rectified. In the case ofdetention, publication in the monthly detention lists of the Tokyo and Paris MoU web
sites will take place.
It is expected that the Tokyo and Paris MoUs will carry out approximately 10,000
inspections during the CIC.
The results of the campaign will be analyzed and findings will be presented to thegoverning bodies of the MoUs for submission to the IMO.

Paris MOU
Mr. Richard W.J. Schiferli
General Secretary Paris MoU
on Port State Control
PO Box 16191
2500 BD The Hague
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)70 456 1508
E-mail: Richard.Schiferli@parismou.org
Web-site: www.parismou.org

Tokyo MOU
Mr.Hideo KUBOTA
Secretary, Tokyo MOU Secretariat
Ascend Shimbashi 8F
6-19-19, Shimbashi,Minato-ku, TokyoJapan 105-0004
Tel: +81-3-3433 0621
Fax: +81-3-3433 0624
E-mail: secretariat@tokyo-mou.org
Web-site: www.tokyo-mou.org

Notes to editors:
Paris MOU

Tokyo MOU

Regional Port State Control was initiated in 1982
when fourteen European countries agreed tocoordinate their port State inspection effort
under a voluntary agreement known as the Paris
Memorandum of Understanding on Port State
Control (Paris MOU). Currently 27 countries aremember of the Paris MOU. The EuropeanCommission, although not a signatory to theParis MOU, is also a member of the Committee.

The Memorandum of Understanding on Port
State Control in the Asia-Pacific Region, known
as the Tokyo MOU, was signed among eighteen
maritime Authorities in the region on 1
December 1993 and came into operation on 1April 1994. Currently, the Memorandum has 19
full members, namely: Australia, Canada, Chile,China, Fiji, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia,Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, theMarshall Islands, New Zealand, Papua New
Guinea, the Philippines, the Russian Federation,Singapore, Thailand, Vanuatu and Vietnam.

The Paris MoU is supported by a central
database THETIS hosted and operated by theEuropean Maritime Safety Agency in Lisbon.
Inspection results are available for search anddaily updating by MoU Members. Inspection
results can be consulted on the Paris MoU
public website and are published on the Equasis
public website.

The Secretariat of the Memorandum is locatedin Tokyo, Japan. The PSC database system, theAsia-Pacific Computerized Information System(APCIS), was established. The APCIS center islocated in Moscow, under the auspices of theMinistry of Transport of the Russian Federation.

The Secretariat of the MoU is provided by theNetherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and theEnvironment and located in The Hague.

2

Port State Control is a check on visiting foreign ships to verify their compliance with internationalrules on safety, pollution prevention and seafarers living and working conditions. It is a means ofenforcing compliance in cases where the owner and flag State have failed in their responsibility toimplement or ensure compliance. The port State can require defects to be put right, and detain theship for this purpose if necessary. It is therefore also a port State’s defence against visiting
substandard shipping.

3

Rijnstraat 8P.O. Box 16191
2500 BD The Hague
The Netherlands

Telephone: +31 70 456 1508
E-mail: secretariat@parismou.org
Internet : www.parismou.org

QUESTIONNAIRE CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN ON SAFETY OF
NAVIGATION (SOLAS CH.V) 2017
Inspection Authority:
Ship Name:IMO Number:
Date of Inspection

Flag:
Classification Society:Inspection Port:

No.

Item

Yes

No

N/A

Q.1*

Is ship's navigation equipment in accordance with its applicablesafety certificate (SEC,PSSC, CSSC)?
(S74/CI/R12)







Q.2*

Does the ECDIS have the appropriate up-to-date electronic charts
for the intended voyage and is there a suitable back-uparrangement?
(S74/CV/R19.2)







Q.3

Is there evidence that all watchkeeping officers comply with STCW
requirements for ECDIS?
(STCW/A-II/1)







Q.4*

Can watchkeeping officers demonstrate familiarization with ECDIS?
(STCW/A-VIII/2)





Q.5*

Can ship’s VDR/SVDR record data fully?
(S74/CV/R18)





Q.6*

Is second and/or third stage remote audible alarm of BNWAS
recognized?
(S74/CV/R19.2.2)







Q.7

Is the ship’s Automatic Identification System transmitting correct
particulars?
(S74/CV/R19.2.4)





Q.8

Does the passage plan cover the whole voyage?
(S74/CV/R34,STCW/A-VIII/2)





Q.9*

Does all crew know and respect the official working language as
established and recorded in the ship's logbook?
(S74/CV/R14)





Q.10*

Is the crew familiar with the procedure of emergency operation ofsteering gear?
(S74/CII-1/R29, S74/CV/R26)





Q.11*

Are the exhibition of navigation/signal lights in accordance with therequirements of COLREG72?
(COLREG72/CIII: S74/CII-1/R42.2/R43.2)



Q.12

Is the ship detained as a result of this CIC?



Notes: If “No” is selected, for questions marked with an “*” PSCO should use his/her professional judgement regarding theseriousness of the deficiency as to whether the ship may be considered for detention. The detail of any deficiencies including
serious deficiencies, if any, should be appropriately entered on the PSC Report Form B.
Where there is no box in the N/A column, then either box “Yes” or “No” should be selected as appropriate.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
ON PORT STATE CONTROLIN THE ASIA-PACIFIC REGION

CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN
ON SAFETY OF NAVIGATION (SOLAS CH.V)
01/09/2017 to 30/11/2017

CIC on Safety of Navigation (SOLAS CH.V)
Inspection Authority:
Ship Name:
Date of Inspection

IMO Number:
Inspection Port:

No.

Item

Yes

No

N/A

Q.1*

Is ship's navigation equipment in accordance with its
applicable safety certificate (SEC, PSSC, CSSC)?



Q.2*

Does the ECDIS have the appropriate up-to-date electroniccharts for the intended voyage and is there a suitable back-uparrangement?





Q.3

Is there evidence that all watchkeeping officers comply withSTCW requirements for ECDIS?







Q.4*

Can watchkeeping officers demonstrate familiarization withECDIS?





Q.5*

Can ship’s VDR/SVDR record data fully?





Q.6*

Is second and/or third stage remote audible alarm of BNWAS
recognized?





Q.7

Is the ship’s Automatic Identification System transmitting
correct particulars?



Q.8

Does the passage plan cover the whole voyage?





Q.9*

Does all crew know and respect the official working language
as established and recorded in the ship's logbook?





Q.10*

Is the crew familiar with the procedure of emergency operationof steering gear?





Q.11*

Are the exhibition of navigation/signal lights in accordancewith the requirements of COLREG72?





Q.12

Is the ship detained as a result of this CIC?





Notes: If “No” is selected, for questions marked with an “*” PSCO should use his/her professional judgementregarding the seriousness of the deficiency as to whether the ship may be considered for detention. The detail ofany deficiencies including serious deficiencies, if any, should be appropriately entered on the PSC Report Form B.
Where there is no box in the N/A column, then either box “Yes” or “No” should be selected as appropriate.