The Japan Society Review
Book, Stage, Movie, Arts and Events Review

Editor: Sean Curtin
Managing Editor: John Toppon........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)

Contents(1) Demystifying Pearl Harbor - A New Perspective from Japan(2) Sino-Japanese Relations: Facing the Past, Looking to the Future?
(3) I Survived For All That? (それでもぼくは生きめいた)(4) When Rover Met Honda(5) Kamome Diner (かもめ食堂)(6) Thomasson: Hyperart(7) Prince and Princess Chichibu

Since the last issue both Japan and the UK have new Prime
Ministers, although some might argue that each country’s
fortunes in the World Cup had a bigger impact on the national
psyche. We reviewed several Japanese language books on
now former PM Yukio Hatoyama in issue 22 and hope tosoon bring you a review of one of the recently published ....................................................................................................
New reviews
books on Naoto Kan (菅直人の原点を探る).
www.japansociety.org.uk/resources/the-japan-society-review

This issue’s feature reviews focus on the war and its aftermath,Archivea much more turbulent and complex time than the current http://www.japansociety.org.uk/reviews_archive.html
political upheavals. Sir Hugh Cortazzi looks at a fascinating new
book Demystifying Pearl Harbor – A New Perspective from We are grateful to our regular reviewers:
Japan. It is an English translation of Takeo Iguchi’s acclaimed Sir Hugh Cortazzi Susan Meehan
Takahiro Miyao
2009 book Kaisen Shinwa [開戦神話]. Next, we shine a clinical Simon Cotterill
Ian Nishspotlight on Caroline Rose’s excellently researched Sino- William Farr
Ben-Ami Shillony
FumikoHalloran
Japanese Relations: Facing the Past, Looking to the Future?
Tomohiko Taniguchi
Mikihiro Maeda
Dr. Rose examines the long shadow cast over Sino-Japanese ....................................................................................................
relations by historical disputes about the war and its impact
Demystifying Pearl Harboron the postwar era. Akira Sugino, in his first review for us, takes
A New Perspective froman emotive look at a thought-provoking Japanese language
Japanbook I Survived For All That (それでもぼくは生きぬいた). It
comprises a series of memoirs and oral histories given by six
by Takeo Iguchi
former British soldiers who had languished in Japanese POWtranslated by David Noble
Camps.
I-House Press, Tokyo, 2010.
In an in-depth review Kiyoshi Ikemi analyzes the collaborative
343 pages including index andwork When Rover Met Honda, which charts the successful 15bibliography,
year partnership between two car industry giants. The book
ISBN: 978-4-903452-19-7
explores the gripping saga of how Eastern and Western car
Review by Sir Hugh Cortazzi
manufacturing methods were able to harmoniously blend“This is an extremely valuable
to create a winning formula. It also details how this fruitful
addition to the literature on
venture was prematurely terminated. Susan Meehan looks
Japan’s Pearl Harbor attack”
at the immensely popular Kamome Diner (かもめ食堂), an
enchanting, captivating and beautifully-acted Japanese- declares Professor Akira Iriye of Harvard University in his
foreword to this English edition of Kaisen Shinwa [開戦神Finnish flick (also see our review in Issue 13).
話], published by Chūō Kōen Shinsha in 2008. The author
Adam House gives us his take on Hyperart: Thomasson,in his preface acknowledges the help of such British scholars
an alternative book which looks at the surreal in the world
as Ian Nish and quotes from Antony Best. It is based onof the real. Our final review Prince and Princess Chichibu
considerable research into the original documents andexplores the lives of an international imperial couple. Englishpersonal knowledge of some of those involved on the
speaking Prince Chichibu (秩父宮 雍仁) was the second son
Japanese side.
of the Taishō Emperor and a younger brother of the Shōwa
Emperor. Princess Chichibu, who was known as Setsuko It is a fascinating account of the events leading up to the
Matsudaira before marriage, was born in Walton on Thames, Japanese attack on the United States and Britain in December
England in 1909. Her father, Tsuneo Matsudaira (松平恒雄), 1941 and is essential reading for anyone interested in thewas a top Japanese diplomat, who served as ambassador to origins of what the Japanese refer to as the Pacific War. The
the United States (from 1924) and later to Great Britain (from story begins with Iguchi Takeo’s boyhood in Washington
1928). She had a very international upbringing and during where his father was Counsellor to the Japanese Embassy
the period her father was US ambassador, she studied at the at the outset of the war. It recounts the internment of
Sidwell Friends School in Washington, D.C. (1925-1928). The Japanese officials in the United States in conditions, whichimperial couple’s griping life story captures the dilemmas compared favourably with those applied to American andBritish diplomats in Japan, and their return to Japan via
many faced during the war.
Lourenço Marques and Japanese occupied Singapore.
Sean Curtin......................................................................................................................................................................................................

The book then discusses the growing tension between
Japan and the United States and the Sino-Japanese War.
Iguchi declares: “In a nutshell, the foreign policy pursued
by Japan in 1940 and 1941 was inconsistent, unsteady, anda bit haphazard (page 51).” Before December 1941 thefocus of the Japanese military was on China and the threat
from the Soviet Union. The “liberation and independenceof Southeast Asia” did not become a Japanese war aim
until after Pacific War had begun but was seized on as apropaganda justification for Japanese attacks in Southeast
Asia.

transmission. He argues, I think convincingly, that the delay
in handing over the Japanese note to the Americans was
not due to incompetence on the part of the staff of theJapanese Embassy in Washington, but was due to thedeliberate holding up of transmission of the concluding
part of the memorandum by the Communications Sectionof Army General Staff (page 259). The allegations against
the Washington Embassy appear to have been made in an
attempt to absolve Tōgō Shigenori, the Japanese Foreign
Minister, and Gaimusho officials such as Kase Toshikazu for
their part in the Japanese deception strategy.

Iguchi does not accept the thesis that American economic
sanctions against Japan coupled with American demands
for a complete withdrawal of American forces from China
and the abrogation of the tripartite pact with Germany
and Italy forced Japan into war. But he notes that Tōjō had
asserted that if Japan were to withdraw from China, “fouryears of blood and sacrifice…would be for naught.” It would
have been practically impossible for the Japanese military to
accept withdrawal from China unless they had been forced
into this by an effective embargo or by military defeat.

Iguchi discusses and has no difficulty in rejecting the various
conspiracy theories. One of the myths is that Roosevelt
knew in advance of the attack on Pearl Harbor and allowed
it to happen without giving the US Navy warning on the
grounds that this would make war between Japan and the
US unavoidable. Another is that Churchill was responsible!

Were the Japanese military then set on war with the UnitedStates and Britain? Iguchi quotes the War Diaries of Imperial
General Headquarters which indicated in November 1941
that the Army planners “were developing a strategy seeking
military supremacy by lightning assaults at multiple points
against Anglo-American forces that were neither expecting
nor prepared for immediate combat (page 67).” In otherwords they thought that the only way in which Japan could
win a war against the United States and Britain with theirgreater resources was by a quick and devastating surprise
attack and were planning to repeat their strategy in earlier
wars such as the Sino-Japanese war of 1894/5 of attacking
before declaring war.
Were then the negotiations in Washington between
Ambassador Nomura and US Secretary of State Cordell
Hull just an elaborate charade designed to deceive theAmericans about Japan’s real intentions? Iguchi does notthink so. There were influential elements in Japan whichsought to find a way out of the impasse. Ambassador
Nomura was not a party to the strategy of a surprise attack,but “was destined to be used as an unwitting tool in a
diplomatic plot (page 105).”
The author does not accept the thesis that there was an
American conspiracy to provoke Japan into war. “TheAmerican approach was to create a modus Vivendi andthe Hull Note of 26 November 1941 was designed to bea proposal for a permanent accord (page 133).” It was notin Iguchi’s view a “de facto ultimatum” as some Japanese
have argued and intended to be the starting point fornegotiations. The author notes in this context that on the
day before the Hull note was delivered “the Japanese carrier
strike force…was steaming towards Pearl Harbor (page138).” The momentum for war if not unstoppable wasimmense.
Iguchi devotes part IV of his book to a discussion of thenature of the final Japanese memorandum and its delayed
2

Iguchi deals briefly in chapter sixteen with the Japanese
attack on British forces and possessions in the East before
war was declared. In this case there was no need for delay
tactics in transmitting a final memorandum. When Sir Robert
Craigie, the British Ambassador to Japan, met the JapaneseForeign Minister early in the morning of 7 December 1941
the Japanese forces had begun their attacks on British forces,
but he said nothing of these attacks and the British were
not informed that war had begun until later that morning.
Japan Society readers will find an interesting account ofthese events in Chapter 47 of Britain and Japan: BiographicalPortraits Volume VII to be published in the early autumn of2010. This is by Douglas Busk, who was head of chancery
in the British Embassy in Tokyo at that time, and is entitled a“Disorderly Upside Down Affair.”Sino-Japanese Relations:
Facing the Past, Looking
to the Future?
By Caroline Rose
Routledge, 2005,
175 pages.
ISBN: 0-415-29722-2
Review by Sean Curtin
As the title suggests, this book
explorespostwar
SinoJapanese relations throughthe prism of historical disputes and competinginterpretations of Japan’s invasion of China (1931-45). It
utilizes an impressive array of Chinese and Japanese sources
to create a comprehensive and authoritative assessment of
the current situation. In recent decades bilateral political ties
have been frequently strained over historical spats which inrecent years have grown in intensity as the two governments
and peoples struggle to find a mutually acceptable narrativeof their past. Caroline Rose meticulously charts this process
and her wider objective is to examine the progress made on
both sides during the nineties towards coming to a better
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)

common understanding and reconciliation. She aims to build
upon the existing literature by considering these themes inan overreaching framework of reconciliation.
In her introductory chapter Rose outlines the underlying
historical fault lines at the epicentre of bilateral tension, which
persists despite the efforts of both governments to resolve
matters. On page 6 she writes, “The history problem centres
on an inability to agree on a shared version of history….”
This point was most recently illustrated by the disputed
549-page joint history report compiled by Japanese andChinese academics and released in January 2010. The project
was initiated in 2006 by both governments to examinecontentious historical issues, but Japanese and Chinese
academics still remain apart on issues like the numbers killedin the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, where figures range from
20,000 to more than 300,000. Rose aims to explain why these
war-related issues emerged in the 1980s and continued
during the 1990s and are still presently problematic as therecent report demonstrates.
In Chapter 1, “Reconciliation and Sino-Japanese relations,”
Rose provides a theoretical framework to analyze the processof reconciliation and set a context for some of the casestudies presented in later chapters. She examines the various
approaches in a stimulating and thought-provoking chapter,observing, “reconciliation is a future-oriented, joint endeavour
between the victims and perpetrators, but one that is lengthy,
complex and prone to failure. There is no single, ideal model forreconciliation, and in some cases reconciliation is impossible
to achieve (page 21).” One problem for the two nations was
the lack of meaningful dialogue between them until they
established diplomatic ties in 1972, a gap of almost three
decades over which diverging historical narratives evolved.
During this period Japan constructed a “national memory”
based on seeing itself as a victim of nuclear attack rather thanan aggressor in China. Equally, the ideological constraints
imposed by the Chinese Communist Party’s iron grip during
the same timeframe distorted the Chinese perspective anddid not allow victims to express their narratives if they did notconform to the Party’s officially sanctioned historical line.
Rose identifies “two cycles of Sino-Japanese reconciliation,”
the first taking place in the early postwar years and during theCold War. The initial wave encompassed the establishmentof bilateral ties in the 1970s through to the Joint Statementof 1972 and the Treaty of Peace and Friendship in 1978.
The second cycle begins in the 1980s and unlike the firstincludes many non-state actors such as victims groups,
NGOs, citizens’ groupings, academics etc. Rose states, “Theeasing of constraints during the 1980s and 1990s facilitatedmuch greater discussion of the past both within andbetween China and Japan (page 25).” She also highlights
the increasing importance in the reconciliation process oftransnational groups based in China, Japan, the US, interalia which are propelling the process forward. While thereconciliation process undoubtedly moves forward, it suffersfrom continual setbacks often sparked by historical issues,
which results in a “one step forward, two steps back” (page121) trajectory.
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)

In Chapter 2, “Sino-Japanese Reconciliation during the Cold
War,” Rose plots the initial reconciliation process in greater
detail in order to explain why it did not succeed and the
problems which subsequently arose in the 1980s and 1990s
because of this failure. She looks at the marginalization ofChinese suffering in the Tokyo war trials and how “collective
amnesia” evolved in both China and Japan. An in depth
postwar overview explains how the two sides re-establishedties and seemingly settled the issue of war reparations andapology, but in reality these issues were suppressed andallowed to fester.
In the third chapter a highly detailed account charting
Japan’s contentious school history textbook issue isprovided. During the 1980s and 1990s Japanese neonationalists became increasingly prominent, gaining media
attention for their revisionist views. In China nationalist forceswere also gathering strength, questioning past historicalinterpretations, and often adopting an anti-Japanese stance.
Chinese anger was further ignited by revisionist claims madeby prominent politicians which were later printed in a 1995
book (大東亜戦争の総括) that claimed “the Greater East
Asia War (GEAW) was one of self-defence and liberation; that
the Nanjing Massacre and stories about comfort women
were fabrications…(page 53).” Senior lawmakers in the longgoverning Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) also sought toclamp down on “deplorable” texts books which depicted
Japan as an aggressor in China and instead encourage a“healthy nationalism” in school children. However, various
citizens groups had appeared on the scene by the 1990s tochallenge the neo-nationalists. Rose writes, “The revisionist
groups involved in the movement to correct what they
saw as masochistic tendencies in Japanese history books
faced fierce opposition at home…(page 61).” Unfortunately,
the result of these resurgent nationalist lawmakers madeChinese academics conclude that historical revisionism was
no longer confined to fringe rightwing elements and had
become mainstream, making reconciliation tougher.
Chapter four presents a systematic and through analysis ofcompensation claims made by Chinese war time victims
during the nineties. Rose looks at a representative sample
of lawsuits comprising forced labourers, women forced into
sexual slavery by the Japanese military, victims of abandoned
chemical weapons and biological warfare. The majority ofcases were unsuccessful, with a few notable exceptions. One
case that particularly caught my attention was that of Liu
Lianren, who had been forcibly moved to Hokkaido to work
as a slave labourer in a coal mine. He managed to escape in1944 and remained uncaptured for 13 years, not realisingthat the war had ended. He was eventually found living in acave and summarily deported in 1958 as an illegal immigrantby Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi, who with bitter irony had
implemented the forced labour policy during the war when
he was Commerce and Industry Minister. Liu launched alawsuit for compensation in the early nineties, but this was
rejected. However, after several appeals he eventually won
his case in July 2001. Sadly, he had passed away in September
2000 before the final verdict. While the case was hailed as alandmark, the judge made it clear that the compensation3

was not for his abduction and forced labour, but for the 13
years he had spent in the Hokkaido mountains as a fugitive.
Even though the majority of cases were rejected, Rosesees a positive outcome from these legal actions being thestrengthening of ties between Chinese and Japanese citizens
groups and a general raising of awareness about issues which
had for too long been suppressed in both countries.
In chapter 5, “Settling the past,” using her theoreticalframework Rose explores from the respective perspectives
the difficulties both Beijing and Tokyo have with theapology issue and commemorating the past. One of themain problems from the Chinese perspective is that they
feel apologies made by Japanese Prime Ministers often
lack sincerity, especially those given by PM Koizumi who
normally expressed remorse about the war before orafter making a controversial visit to the war-tainted Yasukuni
Shrine. In Chinese eyes such actions nullify any apology andare in fact counterproductive. Rose observes, “The main
problem surrounding the apparent failure of the Japanese
to come to terms with the past is, from the Chinese pointof view, the refusal of successive Japanese governments tooffer genuine, sincere apologies to the Chinese government
and people, backed up by actions to reinforce the apologies(page 100).” From the Japanese perspective, it appears that
despite numerous apologies given over the years, Beijing isnever satisfied, preferring to play “the history card” for politicalbenefit and “many Japanese feel that no further apologies
are necessary (page 125).” On the positive side, the degree
and extent of the apologies has markedly improved over the
decades with that given by Japan Socialist Party (JSP) Prime
Minister Tomiichi Murayama in May 1995 normally taken
as the benchmark to evaluate subsequent expressions ofremorse. Murayama headed an uneasy coalition comprising
mainly of the JSP and the LDP, the more neo-nationalist
elements of the LDP were deeply unhappy about the levelof apology given by Murayama. Once the LDP were rid of the
JSP and firmly back in power, there was a marked upsurge
in nationalist sentiment which is in part responsible for the
Sino-Japanese tensions witnessed from the late 1990s to thepresent day.
In the concluding chapter Rose looks at the challenges whichstill continue to plague the relationship and the progress
made. Fundamentally, the inability to agree a shared versionof their mutual history remains the core issue. It inhibits
expressions of remorse and apology being excepted whileleaving victims and their descendants with a strong sense of
injustice. The governments have made great strides in trying
to resolve the issue, spurred on by the phenomenal growthin economic ties, but growing nationalist sentiment in bothcountries makes this an increasingly difficult task.
Nevertheless, there is a strong desire in both countries to try toresolve these issues and crucially with the LDP’s five-decadestrangle hold on power finally broken in the landslide electionof August 2009, there is a much better chance for progress.
The current Democratic Party of Japan administration has
little of the neo-nationalist LDP baggage and offers a realopportunity for greatly improved bilateral ties. The only
danger might be if the LDP were to regain power and give4

momentum back to neo-nationalist elements, but this
scenario currently seems unlikely. Rose must be commended
for producing such a substantive and impressively researchedtrilingual work which significantly adds to our understandingof Sino-Japanese history-related issues. She concludes her
work on a positive note, “Reconciliation between the twocountries is undoubtedly making progress, but there is still along way to go.”I Survived For All That –A Tale of British POWs
(それでもぼくは生きぬいた―日本軍の捕虜になったイギリス兵の物
語)
By Hiroko Sherwin(シャーウィン裕子)
Nashinoki-sha, 2009,244 pages.
ISBN-10: 4816609105
Review by Akira Sugino
At Featherstone, 60 miles north of Wellington, New Zealand,
248 Japanese military POW’s were interned in 1943. They
had hidden in caves at Guadalcanal for many days without
food before they were taken captive by the US forces andhanded over to New Zealand. Many of them, therefore,
were in poor health and only about 45 of them were madeto work. The new Camp Commander, however, ordered
105 men to be put to work. The Japanese NCO refusedand sought a meeting with the Camp Commander. The
Commander ordered him to be detained for disobedience.
The Japanese soldiers surrounded him tightly so as toprevent his seizure. Thereupon the guards opened firewith machine guns, resulting in 48 deaths and 74 injured ina matter of thirty seconds.
Contradicting reports about what happened were
presented by both the ICRC local representative and the
Swiss Consul-General in Wellington who both visited thescene. The New Zealand Government rejected a Japaneseprotest, stating that the Japanese prisoners had rioted withstones, tools and other improvised weapons, attacking theguards, who were obliged to restore order.
New Zealand soldiers who were taken captive by theJapanese army in the Second World War numbered only
112, none of whom died during their captivity. It has been
generally understood, therefore, that there is little strong
animosity against Japan, based on personal war-time
memories. A Japanese ex-soldier who happened to be on
a visit to New Zealand recently, however, encountered astrong expression of anti-Japanese feeling, when he wrote
a letter to the editor of a local newspaper which featured anarticle on the Featherstone incident, reflecting the official
version of events. He just wanted to point out its factual
misrepresentation.
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)

There was a flood of protest against the letter. Without
refuting the letter’s factual basis, readers widely accused theJapanese of atrocities in their POW camps and massacres atNanking, and even of enslaving the Koreans under colonial
rule.
The former Japanese soldier was shocked at the violent
reaction and regretted that he had stoked anti-Japanesefeeling by his careless rejoinder. He was relieved to readseveral days later a letter from a grandson of a guard at
the Featherstone camp, recalling that his grandfather waslong unable to get over his nightmarish memories, andproposing not to take issue over the matter anymore.
Cicatrix manet.* One may apparently recover from a badexperience, but the scar remains for a long time. It may
never heal.
This book (in Japanese), “I Survived For All That ― A Tale ofBritish POWs” by Hiroko Sherwin, is based on memoirs andoralhistoriesbysixformerBritishsoldierswhohadlanguishedin Japanese POW Camps in the Second World War.
Admittedly memoirs and oral histories will not be entirely
free from errors of memory and bias of self-justification. But
the soldiers’ memories remain surprisingly vivid as much as
bitter. The authenticity of their accounts is fully supported
by documentary evidence in the form of numerous wartime diaries and memoranda donated to the Imperial War
Museum library. Moreover their harrowing stories arecarefully placed in a balanced perspective with hindsight
and wisdom, by giving prominence to the fact that they
had also encountered good-intentioned Japanese, eventhough their sufferings must have been overwhelming.
Notwithstanding the indescribably hard experience they
were forced to undergo in their camps, they had never lost
vigour to live through either by sheer dint of will-power orby engaging themselves in activities for self-advancement
under extreme circumstances. It should be noted that eventhose who had thus survived had to suffer, almost without
exception, deep trauma caused by bitter memories formany years after returning home.
It was in October 1945, five months after the war in Europe
had seen its end, that the returning soldiers from the Far East
were reunited with their families. People back home also
had long endured hardship in their daily wartime life andwould not bend an ear to what the demobilized soldiers
wanted to tell about their experience in their camps. They
did not return as victorious war heroes either. Thus they
willy-nilly withdrew into their shell, and would not tell theirwhole stories till much later. Though perhaps for different
motives, it was much the same with the Japanese soldiers
who had been repatriated many more months later inthe following year. They were sent back home utterly
disgraced, without fanfare.
What is galling for the British ex-soldiers appears to be thefact that little is known in Japan about war-time histories,
notably about the inhuman treatment meted out to them by
the Japanese army. A number of memoirs by British soldiers,“The Burma-Siam Railway“ by Robert Hardie, “The Railway
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)

Man” by Eric Lomax and “Through the Valley of the Kwai”
by Ernest Gordon, to name but a few, have been translated
and published in Japan. A considerable amount of scholarly
research has also been done by Japanese researchers on
the subject, whose results are now well documented.
Nonetheless,Japanesesoldiers
themselves
are understandably very reticent about theirexperiences, in spite of the fact that many wartime
memoirs have recently been written and published.
Regarding this particular problem of POWs, a slim volume“Building the Burma-Thailand Railway 1942－43” by Kazuo
Tamayama is probably the only English publication fromthe Japanese side which puts together short contributions
by Japanese ex-soldiers of the Railway Regiments which
took on the job of its construction, utilizing the workforceof POWs and Asian labourers. Official records are also
scanty. The Japanese Imperial Army was disbandedby the occupation forces, and nine long years had toelapse before the current Self-Defense Forces were
established. It was much later that any meaningful
work to preserve war-time records was undertaken,
by which time much had been lost or stowed away.
EricLomaxwrote,afterdescribinghowhehadconsentedthe
hard way to meet his former Japanese captor for the sake ofreconciliation, “Sometime the hating has to stop.” Another
British ex-POW said, “I have neither forgotten nor forgiven.
But I have stopped hating. I like the modern Japanese andam happy to treat them as my friends.” He drew a distinction
between the older Japanese who had a hand in the war andthe new generation who didn’t. It would not have been
an easy thing for them to do. Those who had perished intheir camps, and their surviving families for that matter,
will have had no chance to do so, even if they so wanted.
The hand of reconciliation can only be extended by
the sufferers, and the Japanese have only to grasp it.
What the Japanese can do and must do on their partis to learn the history and face up to the facts, however
unbearable. Life is lived forwards, but can only beunderstood backwards. This is a moral burden in theform of a historical legacy that the young generation has
equally to bear. For that purpose, this book will be a usefuladdition to anyone’s library, especially for Japanese people.
* Cicatrix manet – Latin meaning “The scar remains.”

Akira Sugino (杉野明) is a former Japanese diplomat,
who held many posts during his career including
Ambassador to Chile as well as a Minster at the Japanese
Embassy in London. As a young diplomat he read history
at Cambridge. He is the author of Singapore Prisonerof War Camp – Sixty years on - war era testimony (ガポール捕虜収容所 － 戦後６０年 ― 時代の証言), 2005.

5

When Honda Met Roveredited by Mike Carver,
Nicholas Seale andAnne Youngson
CSY Publishing, 2008, 177
pages, ISBN-10: 0956034306
Review by Kiyoshi Ikemi
Although it has now
become nothing particularly
unusual for two automobile
manufacturers to cooperatewith each other for mutual benefit, the collaboration
undertaken by Honda of Japan and Rover of Britain latein the last century was unique even by today’s standards.
As reviewed and analyzed in the book “When Rover Met
Honda,” their collaboration started out with a modest projectof Rover producing cars under license from Honda, and thetwo companies moved “step by step,” rather than setting out
an ambitious, long-term target from the outset; it expanded
to joint development of an entirely new model, to joint
production, to joint purchasing of materials and components,and finally to cross-shareholding. After 15 successful years,
however, the collaboration came to a sudden end for reasons
totally beyond the control of either party.
East Meets West
Perhaps more importantly, this was the first case in theworld’s automotive history in which a company of theEast had joined hands with a company of the West. As thebook’s principal author Mike Carver states in the Preface,
this book challenges the assertion by British poet Rudyard
Kipling (1865-1936), who said, “Oh, East is East and West isWest, and never the twain shall meet till Earth and Sky standpresently at God’s great judgment seat.” Toward the endof the book, Carver says: “The book describes some of theways in which Rover and Honda cast considerable doubt onwhether Kipling’s words applied to the modern world. Now
plans in the East for the use [by Chinese carmakers] of what
were once names of Rover vehicles show that Kipling’s views
on East and West are well out of date.” If the Honda-Rovercollaboration was unique, the way this book is composed isalso somewhat unconventional. Essentially, it is a collection ofarticles contributed by a number of former executives of thetwo companies who were directly responsible for the muchdiversified aspects of the collaboration. As Carver states,“Only the people working on the collaborative projects canproperly reveal what was involved and what working withthe other company was like. The book…is not intended to
be a complete academic-type examination of the RoverHonda collaboration.” The book starts out by reviewing theevents leading up to Rover approaching Honda in 1978 after
failing to find a partner in the European or American motor
industry. “In summary,” Carver says, “Rover went to Honda…
to ask for help (although the request was not couched inquite such suppliant terms) in developing new car models.”
Honda responded by offering Rover the right to produce a
Honda-designed model under license and sell it under the6

Rover name. Carver recalls that in the course of negotiations,the two companies were able to overcome culturaldifferences, which he says “are exaggerated, especially inbusiness relations. There is great attention given to suchthings as business cards, bowing and gifts – all superficial andcovered by polite and sensible social behaviour. Companies
in the same business will have a common understandingof the business that overrides all such superficialities.” This
does not mean, however, that the two sides were free frommisunderstandings or suspicions. Carver states that in an
early stage of negotiations, some senior Rover executives
started suspecting that Rover was being forced to pay Honda
excessively for the use of the design and for the components
and capital equipment to be supplied from Honda because
the basis for the mutually agreed prices “had to be taken on
trust.” He goes on to say such “trust was not in great supply
in British and American companies when doing deals – apity; the East has much to teach us on this.” After overcoming
these and other problems, Rover and Honda finalized thewording of the license production agreement in September
1979. Although Honda was ready to execute it, Rover, which
was owned by the National Enterprise Board, had to wait
for the British government’s approval of funding. With thenPrime Minister Margaret Thatcher “no lover of Rover” in
Carver’s words, the approval did not come until December
23. Rover’s chief executive Sir Michael Edwardes flew to Tokyo
on Christmas Day for the official signing of the first agreementwith Honda President Kiyoshi Kawashima on December 27.
Read the rest of this fascinating in-depth review on our
website:http://www.japansociety.org.uk/resources/the-japansociety-review/japan-book-review-back-issues
The above review originally appeared in Economy, Culture& History Japan Spotlight Bimonthly, January / February2010 issue, pages 44 &45, published by Japan Economic
Foundation and is reproduced by kind permission.

Kamome Diner (かもめ食堂/Ruokala Lokki)
directed by Naoko
Ogigami2006, 102 minutes
Review by Susan Meehan
After a serving of ‘Kamome
Diner’ I emerged from thecinema feeling altogether
uplifted and nourished as if
by a good helping of comfort
food, akin to someone in a ‘Ready-Brek’ advertisement.
The captivating and beautifully-acted film centres onthirty-something Sachie, who has left Japan for Helsinki;
there she has opened a plainly but attractively furnisheddiner offering simple Japanese fare. Though no one sets
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)foot in the diner, there is no lack of interest in the exotic
owner and the film gently makes fun of perceptions of
the Japanese – three Finnish women regularly peer inthe diner and rush off alarmed each time Sachie looks atthem with a welcoming smile. They wonder whether thisdiminutive foreigner is indeed a child or an adult but are
reluctant to check for themselves.

Hyperart: Thomasson

Tommi (Jarkko Niemi), a young Japanophile who speaks asmattering of Japanese and wears Japan-themed t-shirts
ends up being Sachie’s first customer and regular and assuch gets free cups of coffee thereafter. On one occasion
he asks Sachie for the lyrics to the ‘Gatchaman’ (Japanese
animated programme) song, which for the first time makes
her really think about Japan.

Review by Adam House

That very day Sachie comes across the unusual looking
Midori (Hairi Katagiri) reading ‘Moomin Summer Madness’in a bookshop café. Much to Sachie’s delight, Midori
scribbles down the Gatchaman lyrics for her and ends up
staying at Sachie’s home while helping out at the diner for
free.
Midori, randomly holidaying in Finland, is a kooky straighttalking individual. Out of gratitude to Sachie for her
hospitality and friendship, she thinks of ways of attracting
more customers to the eatery through advertising it
to Japanese tourists or pandering to the Finnish palate
through adding reindeer and herring ‘onigiri’ (rice balls)
to the menu. Sachie, however, is adamant that her simple
menu will eventually win over local Finns and doesn’t wantto pander to customers in any way. She is confident thatthe simple plum, seaweed and salmon onigiri or Japanese‘soul food’ will naturally attract a Finnish clientele.
This does happen eventually, helped along the way by the
introduction of cinnamon rolls which end up drawing in
locals, including the three peering Finnish ladies. The dinerbecomes the toast of the town as customers start eating
the onigiri and pork cutlets in equal measure.
The sense of community that Sachie creates is palpable;
she also ends up ‘adopting’ middle-aged Masako (Masako
Motai). Masako, interested in visiting the country which she
has got to know through Finnish TV’s quirky endurance
and air guitar competitions (a funny reversal as it is usuallyJapanese TV oddities which claim all the attention), andrelieved of looking after her parents after more than twenty
years, ends up slightly aimlessly in Helsinki.
The film is a tribute to female solidarity, acceptance andquirkiness. Funny and beautifully filmed - the shots ofphotogenic Helsinki are mesmerising and the scenes
capturing the trickling sound of coffee filtering and onigiri
being prepared in the diner are captivating – a real feast
and tonic for all the senses, leaving one with a craving for
more.

Editor’s note: This extremely popular movie has also beenreviewed by Fumiko Halloran in Issue 13 (Vol. 3 No. 1). She
takes a different, but equally affectionate, angle.

Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)by Genpei Akasegawa,translated by Matt Fargo
Kaya Press, 2010,352 pages.
ISBN:9781885030467
Walking back from a lunch
break, Genpei Akasegawa
and two friends had walked
passed what has now cometo be known in the worldof Hyperart as, ‘The Yotsuya
Staircase’, unconsciously walking up one side, walking along
the small platform and then walking down the opposite
side. A small flight of stairs, seven in all on each side, witha wooden banister, much the same as many other stairs,
although when looking at it, something was amiss, usually
the platform would lead to a door, but here there was nodoor, looking at them, they seemed to be a completely
useless flight of stairs. Perhaps at some distant point in thepast there had been a door at the top but now no longer
there, it had rendered the stair’s use obsolete. On closer
inspection they came to see that a section of rail from thebanister had actually broken off and been replaced bya new piece of wood. They surmised that not only was it
functioning as a staircase that actually led to nowhere andwas also being preserved and maintained as such. So begins
Genpei Akasegawa’s book which originally appeared ascolumns in photography magazines from the mid-eighties.
It was published in Japan by Chikuma Shobo Publishingback in 1987.
Realizing that he was moving on from l’art pour l’art, to le stairs
pour le stairs maybe, Akasegawa termed this art ‘Hyperart’,and debating it over with his students they decided theyneeded a more precise name for their discoveries, and theycame up with the name Thomasson. Gary Thomasson,
a baseball player who had then been recently signed by
the Yomiuri Giants, encapsulated everything that the art
signified. Since starting his career with the Giants he had
failed to make contact bat with ball, although being paid
a mint he served no great purpose. So the momentum
for the hunt of Thomassons begins and they discover the‘defunct ticket window of Ekoda’ (sealed with plywood),‘the pointless gate at Ochanomizu’,(looks like a gate but
is completely sealed with concrete),mysterious eaves thatjut out of walls protecting vanished mail boxes of longago. Many examples prove to be puzzling to solve, like afloating doorway appearing in a wall that belongs to thebasement of a house? The photograph used as the book’s
cover comes from a reader’s report in Urawa. Noticing awall of a drycleaner’s that appeared to have a blip in the
middle, closer inspection revealed that it was in actual fact a
doorknob for a door that had been sealed over. The reader
concludes his report, “what’s more, the doorknob actuallyturned.”7

Soon with numerous reports of sightings and photographs
being sent in by magazine readers, some from as far as Parisand China, it became clear that Thomassons were not only
a Japanese phenomenon, but could be found whereverhumans create buildings. Collecting together paintings,
models and photographs, Akasegawa hosted the world’s
first exhibition of Thomasson artefacts which he called“A Neighbourhood in Agony,” and interest was such thatbus tours were organized around Tokyo to visit the various
Thomasson locations. Although told in a compère like prose,
the book explores the unconscious side of architecture,
which in turn has created some truly inspiring curious objects
which question what we think of as art and what constitutes
architecture. Probing into these architectural oddities,
Akasegawa observes that “The city itself was just an instance,
a fleeting phenomena.” These pieces seem to appear to us,
like they’ve floated up from an archaeological dig.
Translated by Matt Fargo, who provides a summary of
his thoughts about translating the book, Reiko Tomii also
provides an in-depth essay on Akasegawa Genpei, who
under the pen name Katsuhiko Otsuji won the Akutagawa
Prize for fiction in 1981. Akasegawa is also a key figurein the modern Japanese art world since the sixties, being
involved with the art groups Hi Red Center and Neo Dada.
The book is full of many photographs and if you have seena Thomasson, the book also provides report sheets to fill in,
to see more go to http://thomasson.kaya.com.

Prince and Princess
Chichibu, Two Lives
Lived Above and Below
the Clouds
by Dorothy Britton
Global Oriental 2010,
223 incl. Index
ISBN 978-1-905246-24-3
Review by Sir Hugh Cortazzi
In 1996 Dorothy Britton’stranslation of part of Princess
Chichibu’s memoir was
published under the title The Silver Drum which was asweet box given to the Princess by the Empress Dowager,
the wife of the Taisho Emperor. She has now translated
the whole of the memoir including various poems by the
Princess.
She has also added a new chapter at the beginning
entitled “The Prince: A Vindication.” In this Dorothy Britton
declares: “Masayasu Hosaka’s biography, published in 2000,
makes clear once and for all that Prince Chichibu, Japan’s
popular ‘Sports Prince,’ was not an eminence grise behindthe famous ‘2/26 Incident.’” She notes that the Prince who
was serving with the army in Aomori at the time of theincident told his fellow officers that “the regrettable action
was completely opposed to His Majesty’s wishes; andordered them not to align themselves with the rebels under

any circumstances, and to refrain from doing anything rash.”
But Prince Chichibu was surely unwise when according toGeneral Honjo, aide de camp to the Emperor in 1933, hevehemently advocated to the Emperor “the necessityof direct Imperial rule even if it meant suspending theconstitution in order to improve the lot of the masses.” The
Emperor disagreed. “Prince Chichibu apparently hectored
the Emperor a second time … [and] is said to have had a bitof a temper and tended to forcefully ‘thunder’ his opinions
when he felt strongly about anything.” It is a pity that the
Prince’s stay in Britain in 1926 was so short. He had beenentered at Magdalen, Oxford, but had barely taken up
residence when he was recalled to Japan on the death of
his father the Taisho Emperor. Nevertheless he retained
an affection for Britain and recalled his time in Britain withnostalgia.
The Princess’s personal memoir, sensitively translated by
Dorothy Britton, with its account of the Japanese court
will make readers sympathise with both the ordeals ofEmpress Michiko and Princess Masako when they joined
the Imperial family. Princess Chichibu was most reluctant
to accept the proposal that she should marry the young
prince and in her reluctance she was supported by her
parents, but the pressure from the Empress Dowager
forced her acceptance. Once she became a princess she
was not allowed before the war to do anything for herself,
but she had to follow all the antiquated protocol. She recallswith embarrassment some of her ‘blunders’ arising fromher ignorance of absurd rules: “The first one was when we
returned to Tokyo after the enthronement ceremonies[for the Showa Emperor] and visited the Tama Imperialmausoleum with Their Majesties. I should have ascertainedcarefully beforehand how many times I was expected tobow, but the prince had assured me that all I needed to
do was to copy him, which I did – only to hear someone’s
discreet chiding voice behind me, ‘Since Your Highness
is on the distaff side, you should have turned once more,
stopped, and bowed. Remember to do so next time.” I was
cut to the quick. Moreover, I had no idea what was meantby ‘the distaff side.’ Later, back in my own room I remember
how downcast and dejected I felt.”
Later in the war years at Gotemba, where the Prince who
was suffering from tuberculosis had gone in the hope of acure, Princess Chichibu apart from ministering to the Prince,
developed her gardening skills in growing vegetables andfarming. She had had to come down below ‘the clouds.’
This charming memoir makes it clear why Princess Chichibu
became the British Royal Family’s favourite member of theJapanese Imperial family. Prince Charles apparently always
called her his Japanese grandmother.
This memoir is also a reminder of the unreality of much of
the life of members of the imperial and royal families. In
Japan existence ‘above the clouds’ is complicated by theold myths about the divine origins of the imperial family. In
Japan the Emperor whom we should really call Tenno has
never in recent centuries been an autocrat but there are stillapparently some people in Japan who believe in his divine
origin.
Issue 27 Volume 5 Number 3 (June 2010)