Women and Japan’s Political Economy
Valerie Barske
Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
Course Reader no. 4
2012

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

1

VOLUME EDITORVALERIE BARSKE
University of Wisconsin – Stevens PointSERIES EDITORLAURA HEIN
Northwestern University

EDITORIAL BOARD
Mark Caprio
Lonny Carlile
Parks Coble
Sabine Frühstück
Tom Grunfeld
Laura HeinJames Huffman
Jeffrey Kingston
Susan Long
Laura Miller
Mark Ravina
Mark Selden
Stephen Vlastos

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

2

The copyright of all material in this course reader is held by the respective authors, except whereotherwise noted.

The volume editor can be contacted at Valerie.Barske@uwsp.edu.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

3

Women and Japan’s Political Economy
Introduction

4

Mire KOIKARI

6

Mire Koikari, “Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan,
1945-1952,” The Asia-Pacific Journal 9.7.1, February 14, 2011.
Tomomi YAMAGUCHI and Norma Field

29

Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field, “Gendered Labor Justice and theLaw of Peace: Nakajima Michiko and the 15-Woman Lawsuit Opposing
Dispatch of Japanese Self-Defense Forces to Iraq,” The Asia-Pacific Journal,
October 20, 2007.
Charles Weathers

78

Charles Weathers, “Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women—What
Progress?” The Asia-Pacific Journal, October 3, 2005.
FUJIWARA Chisa

87

Fujiwara Chisa, “Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan:
Gender and Class Dimensions of Income and Employment,” The AsiaPacific Journal, January 2, 2008.
Recommended Further Reading113

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

4

Introduction
This course reader features articles from The Asia-Pacific Journal (APJ) that address
issues relevant to the study of women and Japan’s political economy. Echoing feminist
activism around the globe, the articles validate the experiences of women and analyze how“the personal is political” in post-WWII and contemporary Japan. The articles also discuss
the ways in which women in Japan actively participated in global political developments
such as the 1975 U.N. International Women’s Year. Following the first Conference on
Women held in Mexico City, the General Assembly recognized International Women’s Day(already celebrated in many places on March 8) and the U.N. Decade for Women (19761985). Feminist lawyers such as Nakajima Michiko along with other women activists
worked to pass Japan’s Equal Employment Opportunity Law (EEOL) in 1985.
During the 1980s, university research institutes in Japan published an impressive
amount of multi-disciplinary works on women’s issues. For example, the Women’s History
General Research Group in Kyoto produced award-winning essay collections andgroundbreaking bibliographies. Japanese feminists participated in “third-wave” criticismsthat challenged the centrality of white middle-class Euro-American cultural contexts fordefining women’s issues globally. From the 1990s through the present-day, the study ofwomen in Japan continues to expand in academic, political, and social spheres. At the 1995
U.N. Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, delegates from mainland Japan andOkinawa collaborated with women across Asia on complex issues such as sexual violence inmilitary conflicts. Female activists in 21st century Japan participate in ongoing movements
to challenge neoliberal reforms that privilege corporations over the rights of individuals.
Contemporary scholars in Japan, but also in the USA, Australia, Britain, and Holland,
analyze how Japan’s economic restructuring directly affects the position of women in thehome, workforce, and general democratic populace. Similarly, researchers have begun to
trace the issue of gender equality in the relief, support, and restoration efforts following theGreat East Japan Earthquake of March 2011.
The articles selected for this course packet engage with, contribute to, and intervenein the rich scholarly history on women and political activism in Japan. Some of the main
themes discussed include women’s rights, gendered labor practices, and female
participation in politics. Several authors analyze how the realities of Japan’s economic
recession affect the everyday lives of female citizens. The articles highlight issues often
overlooked in media representations of contemporary Japan including poverty, divorce,
activism, militarism, and the long term ramifications of the U.S. Occupation (1945-1952).
For example, Mire Koikari’s work establishes a crucial historical foundation forunderstanding how post-WWII constructions of gender must be examined within evershifting dynamics of empire, nation, and race in Japan. She argues that American women in
the U.S. Occupation employed “imperial feminism” to foster gendered narratives of how
Americans “rescued” Japanese women. Featuring the activist work of feminist lawyer
Nakajima Michiko, Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field present the 2004 lawsuit by 15
women against the Japanese state to end the deployment of Self-Defense Forces to Iraq.
This article shows how the personal life histories of women give meaning to Japan’s “Peace
Constitution.”
Building on the theme of women’s rights as articulated in the constitution, Yasuo
Takao analyzes women participating in politics as voters, activists, and electoral

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

5candidates. He suggests that despite gendered barriers, women continue to find innovative
ways to enhance Japan’s participatory democracy. Moving from politics to labor, Charles
Weathers provides an overview of gendered employment structures that may limit women
workers. He concludes that political and business leaders facing an aging population and a
declining birth rate will need to “get serious” about reforming Japan’s male-centeredemployment practices. Chisa Fujiwara focuses on how Japan’s welfare reforms fail to help
single mothers. She demonstrates that a large percentage of “fatherless families” include
women who already participate in the workforce yet cannot overcome gendered structuresto achieve economic independence.
Along with each article, this packet features supplementary sources from The AsiaPacific Journal, the URLs of relevant organizational websites, and references to additional
scholarly works. The materials selected provide diverse perspectives from both men andwomen writing in Japan, the USA, and Australia. By creating a space for international
scholars to publish articles online, the APJ offers original English-language coverage ofcontemporary developments and historical research. These materials will remain aninteractive digital archive of instructional materials for analyses of female political activism
and women in Japan’s political economy.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

6“Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945 – 1952”
Mire KOIKARI
February 14, 2011
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Mire-Koikari/3487
Providing historical context for contemporary political issues relevant to womenand gender in Japan, this first article examines gendered power structures in the U.S.
Occupation of Japan (1945-1952). Occupational policies targeted Japanese women and theideal of gender equity to remake Japan as a democratic nation. The Constitution of Japan,
enacted May 3, 1947, states that “All of the people are equal under the law and there shallbe no discrimination in political, economic or social relations because of race, creed, sex,social status or family origin” (Article 14).1 In addition, women received the right to voteand to mutual consent in marriage based on the “equal rights of husband and wife” (Article24). Although drafting and revising the post-WWII constitution involved numerous
political actors including a few Japanese women, historical accounts of this complex
process often celebrate General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964) as a generous patriarch
who “granted” rights to women in Japan. Similarly, historians in the U.S. and Japan credit
women working for the occupation forces, such as Beate Sirota Gordon (1923- ), for“giving” Japanese women gender equality. Depicted as a liberator who helped to rescue
Japanese women from feudalistic traditions, Lt. Ethel Weed (1906-1975) encouraged
women to “pull themselves up by their geta straps to pioneer in democratic procedures.”2
The author, Mire Koikari, challenges this gendered narrative of the occupation as atriumph of democratic emancipation for women. She argues that gender reform under theoccupation represents an example of “imperial feminism” whereby women’s liberation
cannot be separated from Cold War “imperialist dynamics of gender, race, class, and nation.”
In order to view women’s negotiations with power as dynamic and multifaceted, Koikari
employs an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the occupation. Her article creates a
dialogue between occupation studies, feminist colonial studies, and Cold War cultural
studies.
Koikari notes that occupation studies, which remain a primarily “masculine” field,
often overlook the crucial intersections between race, gender, and empire, even in theirtreatment of female historical agents. While creating a space for women’s voices, recent
feminist colonial scholarship recognizes the importance of challenging the role women playin supporting, promoting, and expanding the goals of imperialism. Koikari cites historianTani Barlow (1997) to explain how gender under the U.S. Occupation remained closely
linked to Japan’s own imperial history. Koikari argues that American female occupiers’
efforts to empower Japanese women ironically helped to reassert some of the same racial
and national dynamics central to Japan’s history as a colonial power, particularly thoserelated to “modernizing” women’s bodily practices in Okinawa, Hokkaido, Taiwan, andKorea.

1

From the English translation provided on the Prime Minister and Cabinet of Japan website,
http://www.kantei.go.jp/fo reign/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
2
Comment from Ethel Weed recorded in 1948, cited in Koikari (1999, 348CHECK) and as a header quote for the
introduction to her book, Pedagogy of Democracy (YEAR).

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952
Finally, the author addresses how the occupation must be situated within genderedpolitics of the Cold War era, especially new meanings associated with a post-WWII “cult ofdomesticity.” Cold War civil defense programs and military notions of containment
targeted female gendered spaces of the home, kitchen, and even bomb shelters. However,as Koikari concludes, Japanese women actively participated in but also resisted Cold War
politics of domesticity and should not be viewed as helpless victims without historicalagency. Overall, this article offers new insights on the U.S. occupation of Japan along withan accessible review of current scholarship for studying women and gender as a categoryof historical analysis in postwar Japan.

7

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

8

Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945 – 1952
Mire Koikari
Introduction
On August 15, 1945, World War II came to an end with Japan's unconditional surrender. General
Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers (SCAP), flew from thePhilippines to Japan with a mission to occupy and demilitarize the defeated nation. The place andmanner of MacArthur’s arrival seemed to signal the victor’s absolute confidence andunquestioned authority over its vanquished enemy. MacArthur – the embodiment of U.S.
military power and a consummate actor well known for his grand performance – landed at the
Atsugi Airfield, previously a training field for Japanese kamikaze fighters, with a handful ofAllied troops. MacArthur himself was armed only with a corncob pipe. Despite his staff’s
concern about possible attacks by enemy soldiers not yet disarmed, MacArthur’s triumphantlanding was followed by a smooth procession to the New Grand Hotel in Yokohama and later anentry into Tokyo where he established the General Headquarters (GHQ) of SCAP in the Dai-ichi
Seimei Insurance Building. A new chapter of postwar U.S.-Japan relations thus opened withrichly gendered and racialized symbolism: the United State’s imposition of white masculine
military authority over Japan, now a defeated and subjugated nation in the Far East.
Following the ferocious belligerence between the enemies inWorld War II, many Japanese feared that the objective of theoccupation was to punish Japan. Yet, MacArthur declared
U.S. intentions benign and noble: to "reorient" and"rehabilitate" Japan into a modern, democratic, andenlightened nation. Perceiving the Japanese as an "alien raceof spiritual growth stunted by long tenure under the physical,
mental and cultural strictures of feudal precepts," he wassupremely confident of his ability to transplant American
ideals to Japan and to civilize its subjects. He had what heconsidered evidence to support his conviction: a half centuryof U.S. governance in the Philippines had demonstrated
America's capacity to "civilize" an alien and inferior race andlay the foundations for "democracy" abroad. Just as the U.S.
policy of "benign assimilation" in the Philippines had
uplifted its subjects from a state of ignorance and savagery,so would the U.S. occupation give the Japanese an
unprecedented opportunity for civilization and enlightenment.1
It was within this context of the American project to civilize and democratize a racially inferior
other that Japanese women as gendered subjects emerged as centrally important figures. Seen by
the occupation authorities as victims for centuries of "Oriental male chauvinism," Japanesewomen embodied feudal tradition, backwardness, and lack of civilization. As helpless women ofcolor, they became ideal candidates for American salvation and emancipation. The occupier's
zeal for liberation of Japanese women from indigenous male domination was all-consuming andKoikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

9multifaceted. MacArthur granted suffrage to Japanese women and praised their "progress" under
U.S. tutelage as setting an example for the world.2 Other male occupiers "emancipated" Japanesewomen by initiating various constitutional and legal changes and policies. Following a familiar
colonial trope of heterosexual rescue and romance, some American men expressed their desire tosave Japanese women in more personal ways: Earnest Hoberecht, a correspondent for United
Press International, advocated kissing as a path to liberation’3 Raymond Higgins, the military
governor stationed in Hiroshima, married his Japanese maid to "save" her from the aftermath of
the atomic bomb and her abusive husband.4
The postwar U.S.-Japan encounter involved dynamics that went beyond the colonial trope ofheterosexual romance, however. No less earnest in their attempt to emancipate and transform
Japanese women were American women reformers in the occupation forces. Beate Sirota
Gordon, a twenty-two-year-old European Jewish immigrant to the US who had spent early years
in Japan, pushed for a constitutional guarantee of gender equality – a guarantee nonexistent in
the United States – as “the only woman in the room” where American male reformers debatedthe contours and content of postwar Japanese constitution.
A group of American women occupiers led by Ethel Weed
worked tirelessly to implement the ideal of gender equality andtransform Japanese women at the grassroots level. Using skits,role playing, pamphlets, among others, women occupiers such as
Carmen Johnson and Helen Hosp Seamans disseminated the spirit
and practice of “democracy” among Japanese women with whomthey often formed strong bonds that continued well after theoccupation. These American women's passion for gender reform
was all the more remarkable, as they were utterly unfamiliar withJapan, with few exceptions had no Japanese language skills,
received no extensive training for their task, and were often
relegated to marginal positions within the predominantly male
SCAP bureaucracy. Many Japanese women enthusiasticallywelcomed American reformers and their efforts to democratize
Japan, and tapped into shared discursive repertoires of genderequality and democracy to articulate their own visions of postwar
womanhood. For some, such as KatÅ• Shizue, the occupation
provided unprecedented opportunities to collaborate with
Gordon in the Occupation
American reformers and to promote herself as the feminist leader
in postwar Japan. Even those who explicitly challenged American rule, such as Nosaka RyÅ•and Miyamoto Yuriko who were communist writer-activists and champions of working-classwomen's causes, also benefited from the occupation as they stepped into a new space opened up
by American reformers to articulate their own visions of gender and nation in postwar Japan.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

10

Over the past six decades, belief in the successful transformation ofJapanese women's lives provided many occupiers and subsequent
generations of Americans with "unquestionable" evidence that U.S.
interventions in Japan were beneficent. The picture of Japanese womenbeing liberated from feudal male domination and gaining new rights
under U.S. tutelage is also etched in the minds of many Japanese, and isunderstood as a turning point in the history of Japan. The view of theoccupation as a remarkably generous effort by the victor to democratize
Japan and emancipate its women has constituted a gendered historicalaccount shaping American and Japanese self-understandings.
Rethinking the Occupation: Women, Gender, and Cold War US
Imperialism

Kato Shidzue with
Margaret Sanger

Pedagogy of Democracy: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan (Temple
University Press, 2008) intervenes in the triumphant narrative of the occupation, women, anddemocracy to provide a critical feminist perspective. Rather than assessing the impact ofconstitutional revision, civil code reform, and other gender reform on Japanese women, it traces
how the occupation opened up a new space where American and Japanese women would
articulate certain forms of feminism by drawing on prewar notions of gender, race, nation andempire and refitting them to the Cold War context of anti-communism and imperial
expansionism. Far from a moment of women's liberation, the occupation's gender reform was acase of "imperial feminism"5 where the agenda of "women's emancipation" became deeplyintertwined with imperialist dynamics of gender, race, class, and nation, turning American andJapanese women into complicit participants in the Cold War.
Specifically, during the occupation, American women participated in U.S. imperialism bydisseminating Cold War discourses of femininity and domesticity and promoting theAmericanization of postwar Japan in the name of women’s emancipation. Such a project ofwomen’s emancipation was inspired by, and in turn promoted and justified, U.S. imperial
expansionism, sustaining the pattern of feminism's collaboration with nationalist and imperialist
politics that had emerged since the late nineteenth century. At the same time, American women
also subverted the dominant structure of power, as their participation in gender reform in aforeign country visibly contradicted the Cold War notion of women safely contained withindomestic boundaries.
Equally complex dynamics were observed among Japanese women. Japanese middle-classwomen enthusiastically welcomed the occupiers’ reform project and embraced American
discourses of democracy and gender equality, while also re-circulating prewar and wartime
discourses of women, family, and nation in order to reassert their own respectability as “Japanesewomen.”6 Despite their complicity in dominant dynamics of power, Japanese women also
developed a close personal bond with American women reformers, deviating however subtly
from the Cold War tenet of heterosexual normativity and causing anxiety among American maleoccupiers. At times, Japanese women’s resistance led to outcomes at odds with the occupation
authorities. Women unionists openly defied the Americans by participating in communist-led
labor protests and praising gender policies in the Soviet Union and China. However, they also

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

11

hewed generally to Cold War ideals of domesticity and heterosexuality and stigmatized poor,
economically displaced women who earned their means as prostitutes. In U.S.-occupied Japan,
then, American and Japanese women were constantly stepping in and out of the dominant
apparatus of power, sometimes reinforcing and at other times undermining an emerging structureof hegemony. Recast from a critical feminist perspective, the U.S. occupation of Japan becomes
an extraordinarily dynamic and multifaceted story about women’s negotiations with power.
Simultaneous tenacity and instability of hegemony, and unpredictable and ironic outcomes ofpolitical mobilization attempted in the name of women’s liberation, constitute the major facets ofthis historical drama.
In analyzing the occupation as a case of Cold War
imperial feminism, I create an interdisciplinary
dialogue among occupation studies, feminist
colonial and postcolonial studies, and Cold War
cultural studies, each one of which highlights thecentrality of gender for critical understandings ofnineteenth- and twentieth-century global politics.
As discussed below, this interdisciplinary
dialogue not only results in richer analysis of theoccupation itself; it also challenges eachdiscipline to consider some of its preexisting
analytical and empirical assumptions.
Pan Pan girls soliciting during the Occupation

Occupation Studies
Since the end of World War II, the task of documenting and evaluating the U.S. occupation ofJapan has generated numerous and contentious debates among scholars and journalists in Japanand the United States, resulting in a large body of work collectively referred to as occupation
studies, or senryÅ• kenkyÅ«. Spearheaded by such notable scholars as John Dower, Carol
Gluck, and Takemae Eiji among others, the field has produced diverse interpretations of theoccupation,7 including recent critical studies such as John Dower’s Embracing the Defeat: Japanin the Wake of World War II and Yukiko Koshiro’s Trans-Pacific Racisms and the U.S.
Occupation of Japan.8 John Dower situates the occupation within the larger context of imperial
culture, history, and politics and provides a genealogical perspective on race and racism.
Observing American racism toward Japan during the war and the postwar occupation, he argues
that American understanding of self as civilized and superior and Japan as uncivilized andinferior can be traced back not only to "racial stereotypes that Europeans and Americans had
applied to nonwhites for centuries: during the conquest of the New World, the slave trade, theIndian Wars in the United States, the agitation against Chinese immigrants in America, thecolonization of Asia and Africa, the U.S. conquest of the Philippines at the turn of the century,"
but more generally to the long-standing Western colonial vocabularies of the superior West andthe inferior Orient/Other.9 Defining the occupation as an instance of "imperial democracy"
driven by the notion of white supremacy, he argues that "[f]or all its uniqueness of time, place,Women and Japan’s Political Economy

12

and circumstance – all its peculiarly 'American' iconoclasm – the occupation was…but a new
manifestation of the old racial paternalism that historically accompanied the global expansion of
the Western powers."10 Dower illuminates how within the context of American imperial
democracy and racism Japanese actively engaged in a diverse range of political negotiations withthe occupiers – from collaboration to manipulation to resistance – at the grassroots andintergovernmental levels.
Focusing on the parallel and mutually reinforcing development of American and Japanese racism
and imperialism, Yukiko Koshiro argues that race constituted a common discursive groundwhere the two former enemies came to affirm each other's standing in international hierarchies,
which led to "successful" and indeed "smooth" Cold War alliance making. Adopting Westernimperial discourses of racial and national hierarchies (i.e., the superiority of self and theinferiority of others) to engineer its own colonial expansionism in Asia, Imperial Japan hadconstructed itself as an "honorary white," a nation capable of assimilating into superior Westernculture and civilization while standing apart from and above other inferior Asians. Despite its
challenge to Western imperialism during the war, Japan had affirmed and reinforced Westernimperial understanding of white supremacy, and Western nations in turn had accepted to an
extent Japan's sense of superiority to Asia and proximity to the West. This mutual dependency ofWestern and Japanese racism continued into the postwar years. After a short period of time
during which race was used as a punitive tool to put Japan back in its "proper place," the UnitedStates actively cultivated and even manipulated Japan's admiration toward the West and its
distance from the rest of Asia to transform the former enemy into an effective Cold War ally. As
Koshiro argues, race and racism functioned as a source of productive power during theoccupation.11
Despite its enormous contributions, however, occupation historiography has primarily been a“masculine” field of studies. Women may enter into discussions of the occupation in descriptive
terms but are rarely treated as a central site of analysis where the occupation-time political andcultural dynamics could be reexamined and reinterpreted from new perspectives. Equally or
more problematically, existing studies have hardly taken gender as an important category ofhistorical analysis whose intersection with other vectors of power such as race, class, and nation
deeply informed postwar U.S.-Japan negotiations.
Influenced by the increasing saliency of women's studies since the late 1970s, women scholars in
the United States and Japan have begun to focus on women's experiences during the occupationand thereby intervene in the predominantly masculine field of occupation scholarship. Defining
the occupation as an instance of "women's liberation," however, the dominant focus in this new
body of scholarship has been on the positive effects the occupiers allegedly brought to Japanesewomen. Susan Pharr's influential article, "The Politics of Women's Rights," is a prime example.
She analyzes the policymaking processes in which American women occupiers formed “analliance for liberation” with middle- and upper-class Japanese women leaders and pursued
women’s rights against patriarchal resistance from both Japanese and American men. According
to Pharr, the occupation was “the world’s most radical experiment with women’s rights” that
resulted in successful “feminist reform”: "The marriage of democracy and women's rights in theminds of most Occupation personnel heightened the significance of their contribution."12 Suchunderstanding of the occupation rarely questions the motives and intentions of American womenKoikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

13

occupiers and ignores racism, sexism, classism, and imperialism that informed these women’s
practices in occupied Japan.
To a surprising degree, Japanese scholars share Pharr's perspective. Citing Pharr, Uemura
Chikako and other Japanese women scholars argue that the occupation's gender reform provides
overwhelming evidence of the positive role that the United States, and especially its women
occupiers, played for Japanese women. Even though U.S. gender interventions might not havebeen thorough or sufficient, the occupation was a positive event for Japanese women. It is
important to note, however, that the studies by these Japanese women scholars are significantly
more nuanced than Pharr's, generally mentioning the limitations inherent in any effort to instill"foreign" notions of "democracy" and "gender equality." Uemura, for example, points out that
U.S. gender policies were based on a U.S. middle-class ideology, and thus were not as radical as
they might at first appear. Japanese women scholars, aware of the reverse course, also
acknowledge the less than democratic nature of occupation interventions. Yet these observations
do not lead them to a more critical reevaluation of U.S. gender reforms per se, nor of themeanings and implications of such reforms within the context of the occupation or of Cold War
imperialism. They rarely question what they perceive as the genuinely liberatory motives andintentions of American women occupiers (or, for that matter, those of Japanese women), andignore racism, sexism, classism, and imperialism that informed these women's discourses andpractices.13 This reflects a larger pattern of analysis that has emerged following a “women’sstudies turn” in studies of empire in the U.S. and Europe. As Jane Haggis points out, the feminist
project of bringing women into historical analysis of empire has sustained and promoted, rather
than challenged, Western hegemony as it has uncritically accepted Western women’s claim forbeneficent intentions in “helping” others and thereby reinterpreted imperialism as a feminizedendeavor of education and civilization.14
Significantly, former women occupiers have played a salient role in facilitating this “women’sstudies turn” in occupation studies. Beginning with Susan Pharr’s interview with Beate Sirota
Gordon in the 1970s, scholars and media in Japan and the United States have sought participant
accounts from women who served in the occupation. As a result, Gordon, an author of the genderequality articles in the postwar constitution, and Carmen Johnson, an officer in charge of
grassroots democratization, have achieved a certain celebrity status as feminist mother-liberatorsof Japanese women. Not only have they become women scholars’ favorite interview subjects;
their memoirs have been published first in Japanese and later in English; documentaries
depicting their efforts to emancipate Japanese women have been produced in Japan; academic
conferences and lectures both in the United States and Japan have provided forums for them totell their occupation stories. According to their narratives, the occupation was a moment of
women’s liberation where Japanese women gained freedom, equality and democracy under theguidance of American women. Importantly, the exhilarating story of American women
emancipating Japanese women is not simply a product of American bias. For instance, Gordon’s
1997 English-language memoir, The Only Woman in the Room, which was first published inJapanese, resulted from her collaboration with Japanese filmmaker, Hiraoka Mariko.15 Indeed,
the project of documenting Gordon’s story started with Hiraoka who directed an all-female filmcrew to create a documentary about Gordon’s involvement in the constitutional revision. The
success of the film led to the publication of her autobiography, in which Hiraoka again played an

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

14

instrumental role as she interviewed Gordon and other individuals involved in the constitution
revision, transcribed the interviews, and conducted archival
research.
Clearly, many Japanese women – Hiraoka and numerous others
who embrace the story of their emancipation by foreign women –share overlapping discursive spaces with their Americancounterparts, drawing on the same reservoir of ideas andassumptions about the occupation and its positive impacts on
women. How do we explain Japanese and American women’s
collaboration in maintaining this understanding of theoccupation? Crucially, the narrative of successful gender reform(dis)locates both women outside the purview of critical analysis
of nation and empire. The narrative hinges on the long-standing
Orientalist construction of Japanese women as helpless victims
who, until the arrival of American women in 1945, had been
incapable of autonomous action. The image of Japanese womenas victims without agency conceals, indeed makes unimaginable,
their willing participation in Japanese colonialism. The samenarrative also relies on and reinforces the notion of progressive,
emancipated, and thus “superior” American women who selflessly pursued the emancipation ofother, inferior women. Driven by good intentions, they initiated a remarkable, indeed
revolutionary, feminist reform project. The congratulatory narrative of the occupation constructs
both American and Japanese women as innocent bystanders to, rather than complicit participantsin, the problematic politics of race, nation, and empire. That such women-centered accounts of
the occupation were widely circulated in the last decades of the twentieth century, when thecontroversies involving Korean Comfort Women on the one hand, and the 1995 rape incident in
Okinawa on the other, began to shed critical light on Japanese and American colonial pasts asembodied by colonized/minority women, indicates central and also contentious dynamics
surrounding women and gender across the divides of race, nation, and empire in the Asia-Pacificregion.
While recasting women in the occupation constitutes a necessary task, even more urgent isreexamining the occupation as a gendered and gendering political process. As Joan Scott arguesin Gender and the Politics of History, taking gender as a category of analysis goes far beyond
simply uncovering information about women. Scott defines gender as a socially constructedbinary opposition between the meanings associated with masculine and those with feminine.
Gender as a meaning system constitutes "a primary way of signifying relationships of power" or"a primary field within which or by means of which power is articulated," and "structure(s)perception and the concrete and symbolic organization of all social life." Thus incorporating
gender as a category of analysis leads to a drastic shift in historical studies. As she points out,
gender analysis
provides a way to decode meaning and to understand the complex connections among various
forms of human interactions. When historians look for the ways in which the concept of gender
legitimizes and constructs social relationships, they develop insight into the reciprocal nature of

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

15

gender and society and into the particular and contextually specific ways in which politics
constructs gender and gender constructs politics.16
While I take seriously Scott's insight concerning gender as a centrally important category inhistorical analysis, I see the need to go beyond a study based on a single category of analysis.
The recent important shifts in the feminist paradigm – from excavating women's stories, toincorporating gender as a category of analysis, and finally to examining the intersectionality ofmultiple categories of race, gender, class, sexuality, and so on – have placed studies of history on
new terrain.
Among numerous studies that examine multiple and intersecting
vectors of power, Anne McClintock's study, Imperial Leather:
Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Context, isparticularly useful for the analysis of the U.S. occupation ofJapan, as she delineates the intricate and often convoluted
workings of gender and power in imperial and colonial settings.
McClintock points out that gender is always articulated inrelation to other vectors of power, and insists on the importanceof an analytical paradigm that takes into account more than one
category, cautioning against "narratives that orient power arounda single, originary scene":
Race, gender and class are not distinct realms of experience,existing in splendid isolation from each other; nor can they be
simply yoked together retrospectively like armatures of Lego.
Rather, they come into existence in and through relation to eachother – if in contradictory and conflictual ways. In this sense,
gender, race and class can be called articulated categories.
As she emphasizes, race, gender, class, and so on are not "reducible to, or identical, with eachother; instead, they exist in intimate, reciprocal and contradictory relations." What she refers to
as "a fantastic conflation of the themes of gender, race and class" is a distinctive feature of bothWestern colonialism and the U.S. occupation of Japan.17
Applied to the U.S. occupation of Japan, the analytical approach suggested by McClintock notonly casts new light on American and Japanese women's discourses and practices during theoccupation; it also leads to the observation that the occupation was an extraordinarily dynamic
political process simultaneously animated by gender, race, class, and sexual dynamics. A
multivector analysis of the occupation and its gender reform provides a unique analyticalframework that leads to different interpretations of a given event that often oppose those
exclusively focused on race, gender, or class. The significance of this approach is pointed out by
Dorinne Kondo, who succinctly argues that analysis that pays attention to a single category of
power "forecloses the possibility of ruptures and interventions when other forces are
considered."18 Indeed, the heterogeneous – and often disruptive, contradictory, and uneven –nature of the occupation and its gender reform can only be illuminated by attending to theintersection of multiple strands of power that sometimes work with, but other times against, each

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

16

other. A multivector analysis of power allows us to examine, for example, how the occupiers'
gender reform as an apparatus of domination was made all the more powerful as it was energizedby the convergence of race, gender, and class dynamics. Gender reform relied on and reinscribed
the racialized imperial notions of American superiority and Japanese inferiority on the one hand,and on the other recruited Japanese middle-class women as a tool of class containment, that is, asconservative, anticommunist allies in the midst of increasingly volatile labor mobilization. Yet,gender, race, and class dynamics did not always so neatly line up. Gender reform also caused
instability and incoherence in the occupation, as Japanese middle- and working-class womenforged a cross-class alliance in critiquing the "undemocratic" treatment of Japanese women in theoccupiers' approach to venereal disease control and reasserted their racial, sexual, and national
respectability. A feminist analysis informed by McClintock's and Kondo's insights thus sheds
light on the ubiquitous nature of hegemony, but equally or more problematically, allows us torecognize hegemony's inability to hold itself together, or its constant "leakage," in U.S.-occupied
Japan.
Feminist Colonial and Postcolonial Studies
The centrality of women and gender in the politics of empire has been emphasized by feminist
colonial and postcolonial scholars in recent years. In Western colonial processes, the colonizers
often analogized relations between colonizers and colonized to a male-female sexual encounter,in which Africa, the Americas, Asia, and the Pacific were imagined feminine, colored, andsexualized bodies, while European and American colonizing forces were white and masculine,
invading, exploring, and conquering “virgin lands.” Furthermore, in colonial imagination, native
women were frequently constructed as helpless victims under indigenous patriarchal domination,
indicating the uncivilized and racially inferior condition of colonized societies in contrast to thegender progressive, and as such, civilized and racially superior, condition of colonizers’
societies.19 Such construction of native women did not remain rhetoric, but frequently led tointerventions in the name of “civilizing” native women and indigenous gender relations.
Notwithstanding the colonizers' seemingly benign intentions, such reform process turned
indigenous women into an important “entry point” for the Western civilizing project whose
objective was tantamount to socializing indigenous women with Western values to create
obedient and loyal colonial subjects. Gendered and racialized acculturation projects were further
informed by class dynamics, as they often focused on schooling indigenous elite women.
Following such reeducation, Western values would “filter downward” to the rest of theindigenous population, destructing the indigenous power structure.
American women, including feminists, actively participated in these gendered and racialized
dynamics of empire building. Studies by scholars such as Jane Hunter, Ian Tyrrell, Leila Rupp,
and Tracey Jean Boisseau have persuasively shown that American women’s articulations of“women’s emancipation” – their own as well as other women’s – were inseparable from theprocess of nation and empire building.20 With ideologies and practices underpinned by a“feminist” critique of male domination at home and an endorsement of an “international
sisterhood” among Western and non-Western women, American women missionaries, moral
reformers, and suffragists were often critical of U.S. imperial expansionism. Nevertheless, theyoften uncritically accepted and disseminated the notions of racially inferior, uncivilized, andoppressed non-Western women and civilized and emancipated Western women who were to save

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

17

women of color. Driven by a feminist intention of emancipating other women, Western women’s
feminist reform work provided a critical means for U.S. imperial expansion abroad, lending force
and justification to its pursuit of hegemony.
In Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity and Transnational
Feminist Practices, Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan explore
the intimate – and problematic – relation between feminism andimperialism:
Our critique of certain forms of feminism emerge from their
willing participation in modernity with all its colonial discourses
and hegemonic First World formations that wittingly or
unwittingly lead to the oppression and exploitation of many
women. In supporting the agenda of modernity, therefore,
feminists misrecognize and fail to resist Western hegemonies.21
Their observations about feminism’s “imbrication” withmodernity and its related institutions, such as colonialism,
racism, and nationalism, provide a crucial insight for analysis ofWestern feminist formation and its relation to other women. The
question we need to ask is no longer whether Western feminists
were imperialists or anti-imperialists. Rather we need to investigate when and how feminist
discourses and practices inform and are in turn informed by politics of nation and empire.
In Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire, and the Cultures of Travel, which examines
British and Indian feminist formations, Inderpal Grewal offers analytical insights that are
applicable to instances beyond British imperialism and that put not only Western but also nonWestern feminist formations under critical scrutiny:[M]any forms of feminisms existed through participating in certain dominant discourses so thatthe issue, then, is not a search for a transparent or transcendent feminism but a need to examine
the conditions of possibility of these feminisms…Rather than debate feminism’s collusions orresistance, I argue that nationalism, imperialism, and colonial discourse shaped the contexts inwhich feminist subjects became possible in both England and India.”
Recognizing imperialism as an enabling condition – a condition that “provided possibilities andproblematic” for feminism – is crucial.22 Moreover, by showing colonized (in this instance,
Indian) women’s feminist formation as equally, although differently, embedded in modernity,
nationalism, and imperialism, Grewal challenges binary, oppositional notions of dominant andoppressed, or colonized and colonized.
The US occupation of Japan and its gender reform shed light on the important connections
among women, gender, feminism, and empire: the American masculine gaze toward Japanesewomen, indeed toward the Japanese nation as a whole; constructions of Japan as feudal,
patriarchal, and thus racially inferior, in contrast to the modern, gender progressive, and thus
racially superior United States; the centrality of Japanese women’s reform as an American

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

18

civilizing and modernizing project; mobilization of Japanese elite women as a point of“infiltration” in the project of postwar Americanization of Japan; and finally, American women’s
feminist discourses and practices concerning Japanese women’s “emancipation” which were
inseparable from gendered colonial understandings of emancipated American women andvictimized Japanese women who were in need of guidance and rescue. In American genderreform in postwar Japan, feminist emancipatory rhetoric and practices were never outside, butrather at the center, of postwar American imperial expansionism.
Despite these similarities between the U.S. occupation of Japan and other instances of imperial
endeavors, it is also important to analyze the distinct feature of postwar U.S. imperialism inJapan. Importantly, U.S. imperialism in the case of the occupation was significantly shaped by
the nature of Japan itself. What Tani Barlow calls Japan’s “double relation” to colonialism –Japan’s own development as a colonial power in Asia since the late nineteenth century within thecontext of Western imperial and colonial domination – complexly shaped the postwar U.S.
occupation of Japan. While contending with Western colonial domination, Japan pursued its own
imperial project by colonizing neighboring nations in the name of creating the Greater East Asia
Co-Prosperity Sphere.23 Japanese modern feminism emerged out of this context, sharing intimate
and problematic ties with Japan’s nationalist and colonial dynamics. Despite its unconditionalsurrender and enormous reduction in territory at the end of World War II, many aspects ofJapanese colonialism, including its gendered nationalist politics, survived after the summer of1945. As John Dower documents in Embracing Defeat, the existing Japanese ruling sector
tenaciously negotiated with and even covertly resisted the U.S. authorities. Since the U.S. needed
to remake Japan into its ally in the emerging Cold War context, MacArthur often compromisedand even collaborated with the existing elites, which led not only to a retention of the Imperial
Household but also to the emergence of a conservative, pro-American regime in postwar Japan.
This led to, among others, the Japanese rearticulation during the occupation of its own
hegemonic nationalist and imperial discourses concerning women, race, family, and nation.
Japanese middle- and upper-class women leaders who were empowered under the guidance ofAmerican women occupiers participated in these political dynamics and reasserted their racial
and national respectability, which in turn contributed to marginalization of those historicallydispossessed in Japan’s colonial modernity, i.e., poor, working-class women as well as colonized
and minoritized women.
Cold War Cultural Studies
Finally, in examining the U.S. occupation of Japan as a case of imperialism, it is important toattend to its specific context, i.e., the Cold War. As well documented by scholars on Cold War
culture such as Elaine Tyler May, Alan Nadel, Laura McEnaney, Guy Oaks, Christina Klein, andRuth Oldenziel and Karin Zachmann, among others, Cold War culture spawned several distinct
political discourses and practices which were deeply informed by gender.24
Elaine Tyler May’s study traces how the Cold War produced “containment culture” which was“more than the internal reverberations of foreign policy, and went beyond the explicit
manifestations of anticommunist hysteria such as McCarthyism and the ‘Red Scare’” to involve
women and domesticity as the central sites of its articulations.25 To understand the significanceof gender in containment culture, it is by now almost customary to cite the 1959 “kitchen debate”

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

19

between Richard Nixon, then the vice president of the United States, and Nikita Khrushchev, thepremier of the Soviet Union. At the site of the American National Exhibition in Moscow, Nixon
emphatically argued that the American suburban home, equipped with modern household
appliances, such as a “built-in panel-controlled washing machine,” allowed women to perform
household labor more efficiently and thus to enjoy “freedom” and a good life. American women
owed this to capitalism, free market enterprise, and the abundance of consumer good. All of this,Nixon insisted, demonstrated the clear superiority of American capitalism to communism.
Khrushchev flatly disagreed. He pointed to Soviet women workers as evidence of the superiority
of communism. Under the communist system, he argued, women were free of “capitalist”
assumptions about gender roles and participated in productive activities. The debate gave newmeaning and status to domesticity, endowing it with political significance specific to the Cold
War era.26 The importance of American domesticity – of American kitchens, fashions,supermarkets, hairstyles, and cosmetics – in Cold War politics was not limited to this instance.27
As Robert Haddow documents, “exhibiting American culture abroad” constituted a salient U.S.
Cold War strategy, and things associated with American domesticity, such as kitchen gadgets,
played critical roles in selling the desirability of American democracy and containing theproliferation of communism in the “free world.”28 As Igarashi Yoshikuni documents, occupied
Japan was one of the sites where such gendered containment strategy flourished: the occupiers’
gender reform utilized radio programs, films, exhibits at department stores, and so on to
introduce American domesticity as the marker of superiority and desirability of the American
way of life and to mobilize Japanese women as allies in the Cold War.29
That domesticity came to possess new political significance in the Cold War is observed in otherinstances as well. As evidenced in the civil defense programs in the U.S., preparing for anddefending the nation against Soviet nuclear attacks became a gendered project. The Federal Civil
Defense Administration initiated the nation-wide campaign of “Grandma’s Pantry” which
defined the home bomb shelter and its orderly maintenance by women as a chief means tosecuring families’ and nation’s survival in the event of nuclear holocaust. “Nuclear readiness”
was equated with readiness at home, with women at the center of this domestic containment
project. By “infus(ing) the traditional role of women with new meaning and importance,” Cold
War culture helped “fortify the home as a place of security amid the cold war,” generating thepostwar cult of domesticity where the white middle-class heterosexual marriage and family
became a source of personal and national security, a symbol of (American) democracy andfreedom, and a bulwark against the danger of communist infiltration.30
The civil defense programs also urged Americans to master skills and procedures throughrepeated practices in preparation for nuclear war. As exemplified in the drill exercise of “duckand cover,” the civil defense programs “identify the procedures essential to survival and teachthe American people how to perform them,” with the understanding that “a set of rules, if
correctly followed, would produce the desired results.”31 The acquisition of techniques andprocedures had moral and ethical implications: civil defense was a means to build a national
ethic, solidify morale, and ensure the survival of the American way of life.32
Postwar Japan became a highly charged theater for emerging Cold War culture, wherecontainment discourses and practices, including mastery of skills and techniques throughrepeated exercises, became disseminated as the central component of gender reform. Not only

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

20

was the American middle-class heterosexual family presented as the model of “gender equality”
which Japanese women were to emulate. In reeducating and democratizing Japanese women,
American women occupiers utilized numerous skits and role playing, and at training sessions,Japanese women were required, quite literally, to play a part, practicing their roles until theirperformance became flawless, proof that Japanese women were “rehabilitated” and “reoriented.”
Through repetition, American women occupiers, and many Japanese women, came to believe inthe veracity of American democratization of Japan and the desirability of the American way oflife. In order to “democratize” Japanese women, Carmen Johnson devised skits and drill
exercises based on the materials found in “Techniques of Democracy: A Guide to Procedure forJapanese Organization,” the pamphlet that specified the basic procedures for running anorganization such as voting and making motions. In other instance, Japanese women wererequired to engage in role playing that depicted American-style heterosexual marital relations as
a way of learning the meanings of “democracy” and “gender equality.” Thus, occupied Japan
became a highly charged theater for emerging Cold War culture. It was not simply that Cold War
culture was being exported to and imposed on Japan. It would be more appropriate to argue that
despite its geographical distance from the U.S. continent, Japan became a salient site for thearticulation of Cold War culture, with a remarkable degree of willingness on the part of many
Japanese women to participate in its performance. The occupiers’ gender reform constituted one
exemplary locus of gendered containment culture.

Despite its ubiquitous nature, Cold War containment culture was also fraught with ambivalence
and anxieties. Extolling the virtue of traditional wives and mothers as the source of national
security, containment culture stigmatized (and feared) those who fell outside of traditional
heterosexual domesticity – not only “failed” wives and mothers but also leftist women,
prostitutes, and homosexuals, among others – as the source of threats and even subversion.
Women’s sexuality was at the heart of the problem, as seen in the proliferation of sexual
symbolism in the Cold War U.S. The notion of a sexy woman as a “bomb shell,” “knockout,” or“dynamite” emerged, and a new design of women’s swimwear, the “bikini,” appeared four days
after the dropping of the hydrogen bomb on the Bikini Islands. In one of the civil defense
brochures, the image of women striking a seductive pose in bathing suits personified atomic
radiation, articulating “the symbolic connections between the fears of atomic power, sex, andKoikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

21

women out of control.”33 A Harvard physician predicted that an atomic explosion would result inthe breakdown of familial-sexual order, leading to rampant promiscuity and a “1,000 percent
increase in venereal disease.”34 Moral-sexual anxieties were inseparable from anxieties aboutcommunism, and thus “[f]rom the Senate to the FBI, from the anticommunists in Hollywood to
Mickey Spillane, moral weakness was associated with sexual degeneracy, which allegedly led tocommunism.”35
In occupied Japan, Cold War sexual politics produced a number of ambivalent and often ironic
dynamics. By relegating the task of gender reform to women, the occupation authorities
inadvertently created a “women-only” sphere consisting of American women reformers andJapanese middle- and upper-class women leaders. While these women were ardent promoters ofcontainment politics, they also developed close working relationships, and on some occasions
even extremely strong and passionate bonds, with each other, which led MacArthur and othermale occupiers to caution against the formation of a “women’s bloc.” While this is often
interpreted as a sign of American male occupiers’ reluctance in promoting genuine genderequality, reexamined within the context of Cold War containment culture, their reluctance could
be read differently, possibly as an expression of ambivalence toward female-to-female
homosocial bonding.36 Sexuality became a source of disturbance in another way as well.
Fraternization between American soldiers and Japanese women, and the resulting widespread
venereal disease infection, caused a whole new set of sexual controversies. Far from being
compliant subjects of the occupation, Japanese women proved to be a source of “contamination,”
indeed “menace.” Unruly and uncontainable, Japanese women’s sexuality was endangering thevery success of the occupation. Equally or more problematic, venereal disease was considered asign of American soldiers’ moral, spiritual, and physical degeneration, whose lack of self
discipline was jeopardizing the U.S. mission of defending democracy in postwar Japan.37
The dynamics described above challenge and complicate earlier analyses of the occupation.
Recent work by scholars such as Naoko Shibusawa, Caroline Chung Simpson, Michael Molasky,
and Yuki Tanaka, among others, apply gender as a category of analysis for examining postwar
U.S.-Japanese encounters, i.e., the U.S. as a dominant, masculine figure with a mission to rescue
and subordinate a feminized Japan. As they argue, fraternization between American soldiers andJapanese women constitutes a concrete manifestation of hierarchical, gendered, and sexualized
dynamics between the victor/occupier and the defeated/occupied.38 However, insights drawn
from Cold War cultural studies point to a need for far more complex analysis of gender andsexuality in U.S.-Japan relations. The crisis of American masculinity represented by venereal
disease and unruly and uncontainable sexuality of Japanese women indicate the precariousnessof the notion of America as masculine and powerful and Japan as feminine and docile. The
emergence of female-to-female bonds in the course of gender reform further challenges andcomplicates the argument that the occupation be read exclusively as a heterosexual narrative ofwhite men dominating subjugated and docile women of color. Stepping into a postwar imperial
project primarily defined in heterosexual and masculinist terms, American and Japanese womenshifted, rather than simply replicated, these terms. A reform network consisting of American andJapanese women introduced a narrative of female-to-female homosociality into a Cold War
project predicated on the erasure of any sign of sexual transgression. The current, almost
exclusive emphasis on masculinization of America and feminization of Japan in gender analysis
of U.S.-Japan relations falsely constructs Japan and its women as subjugated and without agency,

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

22

and thus inadvertently reproduces the dominant orders of gender, sexuality, and nation without
due attention to numerous examples of resistance, subversion, and contradictions that occurred
during the occupation.39
Conclusion
Reinterpreting the meanings and consequences of the occupation from a critical feminist
perspective generates a multidisciplinary dialogue among occupation studies, Cold War cultural
studies, and postcolonial feminist studies where assumptions of each discipline are challenged
and even altered. Occupation studies have long neglected the centrality of gender (asdistinguished from “women”), and as a result, failed to understand the occupation as a deeply
gendered project where American and Japanese women played centrally important roles inpostwar U.S.–Japan negotiations. Insights from Cold War cultural studies and postcolonial
feminist studies would lead occupation scholars to reexamine Japanese women as active andcomplicit participants in containment politics and to reinterpret the occupation’s gender reform
as a complex instance of Cold War mobilization of women where Japanese and American
racism, nationalism, and imperialism converged to enable a deeply problematic form of
feminism.
Cold War cultural studies has conventionally focused on domestic dynamics but not fully
investigated the ways in which containment culture was also articulated abroad, with significant
involvement of non-American and nonwhite others. The occupation’s gender reform suggeststhat the international feminist movement constituted a significant site of Cold War culturalformation where American and Japanese women played active roles in simultaneously bolsteringand subverting the emerging orders of gender, race, sexuality, and nation. To gain a fuller
understanding of the Cold War, it is necessary for scholars to cast their gaze beyond the nationaldomestic context and examine transnational space, especially international feminist discourses
and practices, as yet another site of historical and analytical significance, with critical attention toa multitude of tensions, dissonance, and incoherence in containment culture.
Postcolonial feminist studies has been generating increasingly critical and sophisticatedunderstandings of Western feminism. Understanding Western feminism as deeply implicated inracism, nationalism, and imperialism leads to examination of “the conditions of possibility” that
contributed to feminist formations. In the case of the U.S. occupation of Japan, American andJapanese women’s articulations of postwar feminism were enabled by and in turn enabled Cold
War racism, nationalism, and imperialism, facilitating American (re)assertion for racial andnational superiority and contributing to its pursuit of postwar global hegemony. Clearly theoccupation’s gender reform was at one level an instance of Western imperial feminism where thepolitics of “women’s emancipation” reinscribed and reinforced the conventional hierarchy
between a West and non-Western other. At the same time, the complex nature of the U.S.–Japanencounter requires a far more nuanced and multifaceted analysis. Far from powerless victims
under U.S. domination, Japanese women engaged in a series of resistance, complicity, andsubversion, not only challenging hegemonic orders imposed by the occupiers, but also
appropriating them to reassert Japan’s racial and national superiority and to articulate their own
version of postwar imperial feminism that was no less problematic than that of the Americans.
The stories of American gender reform in Japan challenge the binary, oppositional notions ofKoikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

23

West and non-West, dominant and oppressed, or colonizers and colonized, and urge feminist
scholars to critically reexamine the meanings and consequences of non-Western women’s
agency within the politics of race, nation, and empire.
Finally, critical examination of the U.S. occupation of Japan and its gender reform sheds light on
American and Japanese postwar national memories and reveals a number of erasures, orincidents of historical amnesia, that have been enabled by the myth of American emancipation ofJapanese women. The narrative of the occupation as successful emancipation anddemocratization of oppressed and subjugated people, especially women, has enabled America’s
self-understanding as the legitimate global leader in the post–World War II world, and has
obscured the historical reality that the occupation was part of American pursuit of Cold War
hegemony that entailed domestic and international violence and oppressions. The occupation
narrative has played an equally or even more problematic role in Japan’s postwar selfunderstanding. Not only has the myth of Japan’s rebirth as a democratic and peaceful nation
under MacArthur concealed the nation’s colonial past filled with violence and atrocities; thenarrative crucially depends on and sustains the understanding of Japanese women as helplessvictims: Until the arrival of American women in 1945, Japanese women had been incapable ofany action. This notion of Japanese women as victims without agency has erased from thenation’s historical consciousness the problematic roles women played in prewar Japanese racism
and imperialism in Asia. The two nations’ continuing investment in the narratives of women’semancipation during the occupation thus needs to be interrogated and replaced by more criticalunderstandings of women, nation, and empire in twentieth-century U.S.–Japan relations.
Mire Koikari is the author of Pedagogy of Democracy: Feminism and the Cold War in the US
occupation of Japan, 1945 - 1972 (Temple University Press, 2009). She is an associate professor
in the Women’s Studies Program at the University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Notes
1

Douglas MacArthur, “A Fourth of July Message,” Life, vol. 23, no. 1 (1947), 34. There are anumber of excellent studies that examine U.S. colonization of the Philippines from criticalgendered perspectives. See, for example, Vicente Rafael, White Love and Other Events inFilipino History (Durham: Duke University Press, 2000) and Kristin Hoganson, Fighting forAmerican Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and PhilippinesAmerican Wars (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998). U.S. colonization of the Philippines
was invoked as a showcase of America's benign and beneficent rule in subsequent U.S.
interventions abroad. See, for example, Mark Bradley, "Slouching toward Bethlehem: Culture,
Diplomacy, and the Origins of the Cold War in Vietnam," in Christian Appy, ed., Cold War
Constructions: The Political Culture of United States Imperialism, 1945 – 1966, (Amherst:
University of Massachusetts Press, 2000).
2

3

Douglas MacArthur, Reminiscences (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964), 305.

Obituary, “Earnest Hoberecht, Popular Novelist in Occupied Japan, is Dead at 81,” New YorkTimes, September 26, 1999.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

24

4

Raymond Higgins, From Hiroshima with Love: The Allied Military Governor’s Remarkable
Story of the Rebuilding of Japan’s Business and Industry After WWII (Phoenix, Arizona: VIA
Press, 1995).
5

For one of the earliest discussions of "imperial feminism," see Valerie Amos and Pratibha
Parmer, "Challenging Imperial Feminism," Feminist Review no. 17, July 1984. For a review ofsubsequent scholarship on imperial feminism in the U.S. and Europe, see my discussion offeminist colonial and postcolonial studies below.
6

For discussions on Japanese women's complicity in prewar and wartime nationalism andimperialism, see, for example, Suzuki YÅ«ko, Feminizumu to sensÅ•: fujin undÅ•ka nosensÅ• kyÅ•ryoku (Tokyo: Marujusha, 1988).
7

For earlier reviews of occupation scholarship, see John Dower, “Occupied Japan as History andOccupation History as Politics,” Journal of Asian Studies 34, no. 2 (1975), and Carol Gluck,“Entangling Illusions – Japanese and American Views of the Occupation,” in Warren Cohen, ed.,New Frontiers in America –East Asia Relations, (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).
8

John Dower, Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II (New York: W.W. Norton
and Company/The New Press, 1999); Yukiko Koshiro, Transpacific Racisms and the U.S.
Occupation of Japan (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999).
9

Dower, War without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York: Pantheon Books,
1986), 10. For another important study that provides a history of American constructions of"Orient" and "Orientals" (Asian Americans as well as Asians) within the context of Westerncolonial racism and culture, see Robert Lee, Orientals: Asian Americans in Popular Culture(Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999).
10

Dower, Embracing Defeat, 211.

11

Koshiro, Transpacific Racisms, 16. In this study, Koshiro sheds important light on thegenealogy of racism in the United States. As she documents, despite a shift in American
academic discourse of race that moved away from the notion of physical and biologicalsuperiority versus inferiority based on skin color to one of cultural and sociological differencesand diversities in the 1940s, the physical and biological notion of race persisted. While theAmerican authorities increasingly adopted cultural and sociological discourse of race to facilitate
alliance making with Japan, the notion of physical and biological racial differences continued at
the grassroots level, informing everyday U.S.-Japan encounters in covert and overt ways.
12

Susan Pharr, “The Politics of Women’s Rights” in Robert Ward and Yoshikazu Sakamoto,eds., Democratizing Japan: The Allied Occupation (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press,
1987), 222 – 223, 248.
13

Uemura Chikako, Josei kaihÅ• o meguru senryÅ• seisaku (Tokyo: KeisÅ• ShobÅ•, 2007).
Though published in 2007, the book is based on a series of articles Uemura published in the late1980s and early 1990s. For studies that characterize the occupation as positive for JapaneseKoikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

25

women with personal accounts of Japanese women who were involved in gender reform, see
Nishi Kiyoko, ed., SenryÅ•ka no Nihon fujin seisaku: Sono rekishi to shÅ•gen (Tokyo:
Domesu Shuppan, 1985), and Sakai Harumi, “GHQ de hataraita joseitachi,” Joseigaku KenkyÅ«no.3 (1994). For a study that focuses on constitutional revision as the foundation of Japanesewomen’s liberation, see KyÅ•ko Inoue, MacArthur’s Japanese Constitution: A Linguistic andCultural Studies of Its Making (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991). Recent scholarshipon the occupation has begun to offer far more nuanced and critical accounts of American genderreform and its consequences for Japanese women. For a study that examines occupation-timelabor policies targeting women, see Toyoda Maho, SenryÅ•ka no josei rÅ•dÅ• kaikaku(Tokyo: KeisÅ• ShobÅ•, 2007). For a study that examines occupation-era education policies
targeting women, see Tsuchiya Yuka, Shinbei Nihon no kÅ•chiku: Amerika no tainichijÅ•hÅ•, kyÅ•iku seisaku to Nihon senryÅ• (Tokyo: Akashi Shoten, 2009).
14

Jane Haggis, "Gendering Colonialism and Colonising Gender? Recent Women's Studies
Approaches to White Women and the History of British Colonialism," Women's Studies
International Forum 13:1/2 (1990).
15

Beate Sirota Gordon, The Only Woman in the Room, A Memoir (Tokyo: Kodansha
International, 1997).
16

Joan Scott, Gender and the Politics of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988),
44 – 46.
17

Anne McClintock, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest(New York: Routledge, 1995), 4 – 5.
18

Dorinne Kondo, About Face: Performing Race in Fashion and Theater (New York:
Routledge, 1997), 149.
19

As Chandra Mohanty succinctly points out in her discussions on women, imperial politics, andproduction of knowledge, such imperial feminist discourses continue to inform Western feminist
scholars’ analysis and result in binary understandings of emancipated and autonomous Western
women and oppressed and victimized non-Western women. Chandra Mohanty, “Under Western
Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses,” in Chandra Mohanty, Ann Russo, andLourdes Torres, eds., Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana
University Press, 1991).
20

Jane Hunter, The Gospel of Gentility: American Women Missionaries in Turn of the Century
China (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984); Ian Tyrrell, Woman’s World, Woman’s
Empire: The Woman’s Christian Temperance Union in International Perspective, 1880 – 1930
(Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1991); Leila Rupp, Worlds of Women: The
Making of an International Women’s Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997);
Tracey Jean Boisseau, White Queen: May French-Sheldon and the Imperial Origins of American
Feminist Identity (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004).

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

26

21

Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan, eds., Scattered Hegemonies: Postmodernity andTransnational Feminist Practices (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994), 2.
22

Inderpal Grewal, Home and Harem: Nation, Gender, Empire, and the Cultures of Travel(Durham: Duke University Press, 1996), 11 – 12.
23

Tani Barlow, “Introduction: On ‘Colonial Modernity’” in Tani Barlow, ed., Formations ofColonial Modernity in East Asia (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), 10.
24

Elaine Tyler May, Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War (New York: Basic
Books, 1999); Alan Nadel, Containment Culture: American Narratives, Postmodernism, and theAtomic Age (Durham: Duke University Press, 1995); Laura McEnaney, Civil Defense Begins at
Home: Militarization Meets Everyday Life in the Fifties (Princeton: Princeton University Press,
2000); Guy Oaks, The Imaginary War: Civil Defense and American Cold War Culture (NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1994); Christina Klein, Cold War Orienatlism: Asia in the
Middlebrow Imagination, 1945 – 1961 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003); Ruth
Oldenziel and Karin Zachmann, eds., Cold War Kitchen: Americanization, Technology, andEuropean Users (Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2009).
25

May, Homeward Bound, xxi.

26

ibid., 10 – 12.

27

Nor was the significance of domesticity in imperial expansionism limited to the Cold War era.
For discussions of domesticity as a site of racial conquest and national-imperial expansionism inthe mid-nineteenth century, see Amy Kaplan, The Anarchy of Empire in the Making of U.S.
Culture (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002), especially Chapter 1"Manifest Domesticity." For the continuing significance of domesticity in American imperial
expansionism in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, see Rafael, White Love,
especially Chapter 2 "Colonial Domesticity: Engendering Race at the Edge of Empire, 1899 –1912."
28

Robert Haddow, Pavilions of Plenty: Exhibiting American Culture Abroad in the 1950s(Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1997), especially see Chapter 6 "Men's
Gadgets, Women's Fashions, and the American Way of Life."
29

Yoshikuni Igarashi, Bodies of Memory: Narratives of War in Postwar Japanese Culture, 1945
– 1970 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), 78.
30

May, Homeward Bound, 90 – 93.

31

Oaks, The Imaginary War, 80.

32

Examining Cold War U.S. culture where containment narratives were repeatedly articulated atvarious sites, Alan Nadel argues that such “repetition of tropes…facilitates narratives that by
virtue of their repetition seem ‘natural,’ like clichés, and like 'common sense,' refer to what

Koikari: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952

27

everyone ‘knows’ is true.” In the context of the Cold War where much remained unknown andunknowable and fears, anxieties, and ambivalence prevailed, “the rampant performance of
narratives, in such a variety of sites and forms” helped “create the illusion that national narratives
were knowable and unquestionable realities,” thus facilitating successful mobilization of theAmerican public to the Cold War. See Nadel, Containment Culture, 8. For a documentary filmthat illuminates the significance of repetition as a sense-making practice in the Cold War U.S.,
see Kevin Rafferty, Jayne Loader, and Pierce Rafferty, “The Atomic Café” (New York:Docudrama, 2008).
33

May, Homeward Bound, 96 – 98.

34

ibid., 81.

35

ibid., 86.

36

For studies that examine sexual containment as a central theme of Cold War culture, see
Geoffrey Smith, “National Security and Personal Isolation: Sex, Gender and Disease in the Cold
War United States,” The International History Review 14, no.1 (1992); David Harley Serlin,“Christine Jorgensen and the Cold War Closet,” Radical History Review 62 (1995); Allan
Berube, Coming Out Under Fire: The History of Gay Men and Women in World War Two (NewYork: Free Express, 1990); John D’Emilio, Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities: The Making of
Homosexual Minority in the United States, 1940 – 1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
As Gayle Rubin argues, sexuality has its own institutional dynamics and hierarchy: thenormative sexuality is heterosexual, marital, monogamous, and reproductive, andnoncommercial, while other sexual activities and identities are defined as “bad,” “abnormal,” oreven “unnatural.” These other forms of sexuality are further assigned hierarchical evaluations.
Gayle Rubin, “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality,” in Carole
Vance, ed., Pleasure Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (London: Pandra Press, 1989), 280 –
281. During the Cold War, not only homosexuality but also various other expressions of
intimacy which fell outside the normative notion of sexuality came under intense social
surveillance.
37

Venereal disease has historically been a major issue for U.S. military operations both
domestically and internationally. See, for example, Allan Brandt, No Magic Bullet: A Social
History of Venereal Disease in the United States since 1880 (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1985).
38

Naoko Shibusawa, America’s Geisha Ally: Reimagining the Japanese Enemy (Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2006); Caroline Chung Simpson, An Absent Presence:
Japanese Americans in Postwar American Culture, 1945 – 1960 (Durham: Duke University
Press, 20010); Michael Molasky, The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Literatureand Memory (New York: Routledge, 1999); Yuki Tanaka, Japan’s Comfort Women: Sexual
Slavery and Prostitution during World War II and the U.S. Occupation (New York: Routledge),
2002.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy
39

28

Indeed, emerging “feminist” analyses tend to simplify the occupation-era sexual politics,
reproducing an essentialist and universalistic notion of women (and men) which prevents
nuanced and complicated understandings of women and power. For instance, Yuki Tanaka
argues that postwar controversies over prostitution are examples of masculine-military violence
that is part of the universal pattern of male domination, and thus constructs women as victims
under patriarchal oppressions. Tanaka, Japan’s Comfort Women, 6. Examining Japanese postwar
nationalist literature, Michael Molasky also characterizes the sexual politics during theoccupation as the male or masculine domain where a “distinctly male perspective” that utilizes“metaphors of linguistic and sexual subordination” of women as the narrative vehicle prevailed.
As a result, he argues, women writers were “less deeply invested in the gendered rhetoric ofJapanese nationalist identity” and avoided the trope of gendered nationalist narratives. Molasky,
The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa, 2, 132. Far from being outside theproblematic operations of power, however, Japanese women, especially middle-class womenleaders, were deeply invested in a gendered and sexualized understanding of nation, national
body, and women played extremely active and problematic roles in sexual regulation andcontainment of “fallen women” during the occupation. For a recent excellent study that avoids
the pitfall of essentialist or universalistic understandings of women and provides historically- andcontextually-specific understandings of U.S. military and women’s agency in diverse
geographical sites including Japan, Okinawa, South Korea, and Germany, see Maria Höhn and
Seungsook Moon, eds., Over There: Living with the U.S. Military Empire from World War Twoto the Present (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.)

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

29“Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace: Nakajima Michiko and the 15-Woman
Lawsuit Opposing Dispatch of Japanese Self-Defense Forces to Iraq”
Tomomi YAMAGUCHI and Norma Field
October 20, 2007
http://www.japanfocus.org/-T-Yamaguchi/2551
In addition to defining specific rights for women, the post-WWII Constitution ofJapan (enacted 1947) also articulated a commitment to preserving peace. Article 9 of theConstitution reads in part, “Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justiceand order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation andthe threat or use of force as a mean of settling international disputes.”3 The “Peace”
Constitution includes a statement that Japan will “never” maintain military forces. With thestart of the Korean War in 1950, U.S. occupiers re-interpreted the Japanese constitution tocreate the “National Police Reserve,” which became Japan’s Self Defense Forces (SDF) in
1954. SDF troops have since been deployed beyond national borders for “relief operations”
beginning in 1992. Under international pressure following 9/11, Prime Minister Jun’ichiro
Koizumi supported an anti-terrorism law in October 2001. This legislation allowed the SDF
to provide “logistical support” for U.S. combat troops in the Indian Ocean. Based on theconstitutional protection of peace, a group of 15 women led by feminist lawyer Nakajima
Michiko (1935-2007) sued the Japanese state for deploying local troops to Iraq in 2004.
Nakajima and the other plaintiffs argued that the continued presence of Ground SDF in Iraq
violated the “right to live in peace.”
Authors Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field provide a helpful introduction to thelifelong activism of Nakajima along with the context of the 2004 lawsuit. Nakajima devoted
her life to feminist issues, gender equity in labor, and historical struggles for realizing
peace. For example, she worked towards the enactment and revision of the 1985 Equal
Employment Opportunity Law (EEOL). The original law strongly suggested that companies
eliminate gender discrimination in recruiting, employing, and paying employees, but
contained no provisions for enforcement. Nakajima fought for new legislation such as the1999 Basic Law for a Gender-Equal Society and further changes in 2007 that required
significantly greater compliance.4 In addition to gendered labor justice, Nakajima worked
to advance peace activism in Japan. For example, she served as a strong supporter of the
Women’s International Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery (2000), held in Tokyo toprovide a platform for survivor testimonies and an international hearing on war crimes
against women. She also encouraged the creation of the Women’s Active Museum on War
and Peace, the first interactive museum in Japan to focus on women and gender in thecontext of armed conflicts.
Nakajima employed her experiences with various forms of feminist activism in her
approach to the 2004 court case. Following the authors’ introduction, this article includes
a complete translated record of the appeal, including the statements made by Nakajima andlawyer Owaki Masako, plus the individual statements of 15 female plaintiffs. The women
3

From the English translation provided on the Prime Minister and Cabinet of Japan website,
http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/constitution_and_government_of_japan/constitution_e.html
4
For more information on specific legislation and political initiatives for gender equality in Japan, see the Gender
Equality Bureau of Japan, http://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/index.html

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

30

offered personal stories of their own experiences with Japan’s complex history of war andpeace. Their testimonies demonstrate that women’s historical memories matter, as the
personal is indeed political. In May 2006, the Tokyo District Court dismissed the case as“illegitimate” without examining any evidence or testimonies. Nakajima published her
response to the judgment on the anniversary of the WWII Battle of Okinawa June 23, 2006.
She states that despite the court’s inability to “open their hearts,” the collective actions ofover 5,600 plaintiffs finally achieved the removal of the SDF Ground Forces from Samawa,
Iraq. The work of Nakajima and other activists to preserve Article 9 remains crucial, as
right-wing political leaders seek to remove any legal barriers to Japan’s full
remilitarization. This article represents a unique resource that provides extensive primarysources and secondary contextual information to show one important example of genderrelated activism in Japan today.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

31

Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace: Nakajima Michiko and the 15-Woman
Lawsuit Opposing Dispatch of Japanese Self-Defense Forces to Iraq
Tomomi YAMAGUCHI and Norma Field
Introduction
In 2004, then Prime Minister Jun'ichiro Koizumi, in response to a request from the United States,
sent a contingent of 600 Self-Defense Force troops to Samawa, Iraq, for the purpose ofhumanitarian relief and reconstruction. Given that Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution eschews
the use of military force in the resolution of conflict, this was an enormously controversial step,
going further than previous SDF engagements as part of UN peacekeeping operations, whichthemselves had been criticized by opposition forces as an intensification of the incremental
watering-down of the "no-war clause" from as early as the 1950s.
Many citizens, disappointed by the weakness of parliamentary opposition since a partial winnertake-all, first-past-the-post system was introduced in 1994, and frustrated by a perceived lack of
independence on the part of the mainstream media, have taken the battle to the courtroom. As
with Yasukuni Shrine suits, singly or in groups, with and without lawyers, they have been suing
the state for violation of the Constitution in deploying SDF troops to Iraq.

Nakajima Michiko from the 2002 calendar, To My Sisters, a photo of her from her student days at theJapanese Legal Training and Research Institute. A larger view of the same page can be viewed here.

Nakajima Michiko, a feminist labor lawyer, led one such group of plaintiffs, women ranging inage from 35 to 80.Each of the fifteen had her moment in court, stating her reasons, based on her

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

32

life experiences, for joining the suit. This gave particular substance to the claim that Article 9
guarantees the "right to live in peace"—the centerpiece of many of these lawsuits, a claim that
seems to have been first made when Japan merely contributed 13 billion dollars for the Gulf War
effort. What might the "right to live in peace" mean, for individuals and for the collectivity—not
just in Japan, but the world? The women's invocation of their histories is key to claiming
standing: like the U.S., and unlike many European countries or South Africa, Japan lacks aconstitutional court, which means that abstract claims of constitutional violation cannot trigger
judicial review; plaintiffs must show that they have sustained concrete injury to legally protectedrights and interests.
Given the almost, though not total, reluctance of Japanese courts to exercise judicial review withrespect to prime ministerial visits to Yasukuni Shrine, it is not surprising that judges have been
unwilling to acknowledge a claim for a constitutionally guaranteed right to "live in peace." Andyet, the elaboration of this right, the right to develop as a human being without "the fear of
having to kill or be killed," is surely a logical outcome of Article 9 and the democracy set inmotion with the adoption of the postwar Constitution.

Story of the New Constitution cover

It is an outcome that is not captured by discussion of the origins of the Article (e.g., as trade-off
for keeping the emperor, stated in Article 1), much less by the unimaginative arguments aboutYamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace33

the need to become a "normal," i.e., armed nation. Nakajima's still palpable pleasure in theillustration of tanks and bombers going into a cauldron and trains and fire engines and buildings
coming out the bottom in "The Story of Our New Constitution," the supplemental social studies
textbook issued by the Ministry of Education in 1947, sixty years after she encountered it injunior high school, is but one indication of the enthusiasm for peace unleashed by war's end andgiven shape by the Constitution.

From tanks and bombs to trains and buildings"Thus We Appealed: A Record of the Case of the 15-Woman Group Demanding an Injunction
Against the Dispatch of Self-Defense Forces to Iraq" is a text combining the narratives and legal
arguments presented by the fifteen women plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed in Tokyo District Court on
August 6 (Hiroshima Day), 2004 together with the judgment, delivered in May 2004.Thetranslation of this text, of which a revised version is presented below, was undertaken in
preparation for Nakajima Michiko's visit to the University of Chicago in May 2007 as a guest fora course entitled "Postwar Social Movements in Japan" and the parallel lecture series,"Celebrating Protest in Japan."[1] Because of Nakajima's untimely death in a diving accident a
scant three months later, Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field, the authors of this introduction
and co-organizers of the course and the series, would like to pay tribute to Nakajima by
providing a brief sketch of her lifelong activism. It was the historical extent and nature of
Nakajima's activities that made her the starting point of their course planning.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

34

Thus we appealed, cover

Nakajima Michiko was a pioneer who became one of the most renowned feminist attorneys inJapan with a specialization in labor law. She undertook a number of cases involving
discrimination against women in employment and won many of them, including the very firstsupreme court decision in Japan on gender discrimination in employment, which founddiscrepancy in mandatory retirement age for men and women to be illegal (Nissan Motors Co.
Case, 1981).Throughout her career she was active in the Japan Bar Association’s committee for
equality for the sexes, and as a feminist practitioner, she took on many divorce cases.
Her history as a feminist and peace activist goes back to her high school days. Born in 1935, she
experienced the war as a child who suffered from the loneliness of compulsory evacuation,
hunger, and the terror of air strikes. Her first involvement in activism was with the Wadatsumikai (memorial society for students killed in the war) as a high school student inToyamaPrefecture. She then participated in Ampo (the movement against the US-Japan Security
Treaty renewal of 1960), provided legal support for members of the Zenkyoto (All-Campus Joint
Struggle Committee) radical student movement of the late 60s, and then became involved in the
Women's Liberation Movement in the early 70s.While actively participating in demonstrations
and actions, she conducted legal counseling sessions at Lib Shinjuku Center, a communal center
formed by young women’s liberation activists in Shinjuku, Tokyo.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace35

In 1975 she formed a Tokyo-based feminist group, Kokusai Fujin-nen o Kikkaketoshite Kodo oOkosu Onna-tachi no Kai (International Women's Year Action Group) with other feminists,
including Upper House representatives Ichikawa Fusae and Tanaka Sumiko, media critics
Yoshitake Teruko, Higuchi Keiko and Tawara Moeko, and many other women ranging fromworkers, teachers, housewives, to students.Among many significant achievements of the group,
the most notable one was its protest in 1975 of an instant ramen noodle TV commercial
designating a female figure as the one who cooks versus a male as one who eats. The commercial
ended up being cancelled, and the protest is still remembered as one of the most influential offeminist protests. Nakajima also made her office available for use as a space for various feminist
activist groups.
Becoming keenly aware of the need for a Gender Equality Law in employment through her
experiences as a feminist lawyer and activist, Nakajima started a new group in 1979,
Watashitachi no Koyo Byodoho o Tsukuru Kai (Group to Create Our Own Equal Employment
Law), with the Action Group members and others. The group argued that both women and men
should work equally, and that both should lead more fully human lives. The movement resulted
in the 1985 Equal Employment Opportunity Law, a law that turned out to be a major
disappointment for feminists. Nakajima, together with other activists, immediately started a new
movement to change the law. Their activism resulted in the revision of the law in 1999 and in2007.Although the revisions showed significant improvement from the earlier version insofar as
employers were held responsible for preventing sexual harassment in the workplace and forprohibiting indirect discrimination, deficiencies remained and new distortions appeared,reflecting Japan's increased adoption of neo-liberal principles. This in turn prompted Nakajima to
focus on issues related to part-time and temporary workers. She was dismayed about the labor
situation in Japan becoming more unstable and exploitative for both women and men.
Her peace activism paralleled her labor activism. In 1980, with the landslide victory of the
Liberal Democratic Party in the general election and the increased dominance of conservative
political forces, Japan seemed to have embarked on an accelerated course to become a "normal"
nation capable of participating in war. Given this situation, Nakajima, along with feminist
colleagues such as Yoshitake Teruko and Tanaka Sumiko, established a new feminist peacegroup, Senso e no Michi o Yurusanai Onna-tachi no Kai (Japanese Women's Caucus Against
War) in 1980.She was a strong supporter of the efforts leading to the Women's International
Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery (2000) as well as in establishing the Women's
Active Museum in accordance with the will of Matsui Yayori, who spearheaded transnational
efforts to hold the Tribunal and bequeathed her estate to such an endeavor before her untimely
death in 2002. Nakajima was deeply worried about the fate of Article 9 and active in various
efforts to safeguard it. She made sure to cast her absentee ballot for the Upper House elections inadvance of her fateful trip to Hawai'i in late July. Let us hope that she heard the news about thestunning defeat dealt Abe and the LDP before her tragic death although of course, she would
have been the last person to slacken her efforts after an election.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

36

Selling copies of the collectively produced book about the Women's Action Group (The Path Opened by
Women in Action) with fellow member Kobayashi Michiko. Nakajima center.

Fukushima Mizuho, head of the Japan Social Democratic Party and former member of the
Women’s Action Group, read a highly emotional and moving eulogy at Nakajima's memorialservice, which she later posted on her blog. There, Fukushima declared, “Nakajima Sensei did awonderful job of teaching generations of women coming after her. Without her, I would not havebecome a lawyer dedicated to abolishing gender discrimination.” It was meeting Nakajima as acollege student that attracted Fukushima to the law. Fukushima's invocation of Nakajima's cases
involving Nissan Motors, Japan-Soviet Books (Nisso Tosho), Sanyo Realty (Sanyo Bussan),Showa Shell, Japan Iron and Steel Federation (Nihon Tekko Renmei), Imperial Pharmaceuticals(Teikoku Zoki Seiyaku), or Okinawa bus guides from a list "too long to enumerate" reads likethe poetry of gender and labor justice, addressing not only pay inequality and retirement
discrimination but mandatory transfer policy, which Nakajima would come to see as injurious tomen as well.
Like the young women in Fukushima's account, Tomomi Yamaguchi was encouraged andeducated as a feminist by Nakajima. She met her while a graduate student doing field research
focusing on the Women’s Action Group. Listening to her endlessly fascinating stories, shelearned a history of activism that she had not previously encountered. Nakajima tirelessly
supported and inspired her, encouraging her to pursue her interests in feminism and to become ascholar with a deep commitment to activism. Yamaguchi knows that Nakajima's influence willcontinue to guide her and others who follow in her footsteps.
Despite her knowledge, experience, and distinction as a professional and an activist, Nakajima
was a strong believer in the ideology of “hiraba," the level field. She was someone who always
listened to and talked seriously with people regardless of their age, knowledge, or experience.
This was repeatedly demonstrated in the openness and earnestness with which she engaged in
discussion with undergraduates at the University of Chicago during her visit in May of 2007.This
characteristic carried through to her professional practice, which Field had the opportunity towitness directly. The personal and the political were clearly connected in her mind and her

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace37

actions. No detail was unworthy of her attention; she seemed to have an intuitive understandingof how shifts in the elements of daily life, both material and psychological, could make existence
tolerable or intolerable. Still, devoted as she was to her profession (understanding, for example,
the importance of divorce for many women clients), she also wished that she could be freed of
the burdens of maintaining a practice so as to more freely devote her expertise and energies tothe causes that held her attention. She identified herself as an anarcho-syndicalist: both parts areimportant, she emphasized to Field two years before her death.
Nakajima was well aware of the continuities in her life. When news broke of the three young
Japanese taken hostage in Iraq in 2004 and threatened with being burned alive unless theJapanese Government withdrew the Self-Defense Forces from Samawa, she immediately rushed
to sit in at the Prime Minister's residence. She told Field that seeing the picture of the youngest,
Imai Noriaki (then 18), she had said to herself, "That's me, fifty years ago!"[2]It is unsurprising, then, that she should have taken steps—with other women—to file a lawsuit
demanding an end to the dispatch of Self-Defense Force troops to Iraq. The suit ended in defeat
at the district court level in May of 2006.She was not surprised, though angered by the judges'
refusal to show the semblance of engagement. The record produced here bears witness to her
continued resolve.
Nakajima's commitment to peace and justice gave coherence to all her activities. Indeed, peaceand labor justice were mutually indispensable to her vision of a desirable society. What shesought was not for women to become men and to dedicate themselves, mind, body, and soul towork, but for women and men to have richly human lives—each working fewer hours, thus
ensuring work for all and a fulfilling existence for each. What kind of society would it take forlabor to be organized in such a way? One thing is certain: it would have to be a society that had
renounced war as a source of security, economic growth, and collective identity.
[1] For a podcast of her public lecture at the University of Chicago on May 4, 2007, withcomments by anthropologist John Comaroff, please go to this website. For a transcript ofNakajima's classroom interactions at the University of Chicago, please see here. Nakajima's
publications include Onna ga hataraku koto o mo ichido kangaeru [Reexamining "women atwork"], 1993; Kodo suru onna ga hiraita michi: Mekishiko kara Nyu Yoku e [The Path opened
up by women in action: From Mexico to New York], jt. Authorship, 1999; and Onna ga hataraku
koto, ikiru koto [For women to work, for women to live] 2002.
[2] A podcast of Imai's public lecture may be found here.

Thus We Appealed: A Record of the 15-Woman Group Demanding an Injunction against
the Dispatch of Self-Defense Forces to Iraq
Preface
Even now, more than three years after the start of the invasion of Iraq, chaos reigns within the
country, the number killed and injured continues to rise, and because of the unrest, civilians areWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

38

forced to live a difficult life. Anguished as we were by America's unjustifiable exercise of force,
once the Koizumi cabinet reached the decision to dispatch Self-Defense Force troops to Iraq, we
decided to pursue the question of the unconstitutionality of the action in court.
In Tokyo, individual citizens were already filing suits in court, at the rate of one a day, and classaction suits were being filed throughout Japan. At a point where, despite our sense of urgency,
we could not resolve to act individually, we obtained the cooperation of a lawyer, Nakajima
Michiko. As a group of fifteen women, we were able to participate in the lawsuits arguing the"unconstitutionality of the dispatch of troops to Iraq." We filed our suit two years ago on August
6,Hiroshima Day.
Faced with a judiciary that has consistently evaded constitutional findings, we regretfully
decided that the only form our suit could take was that of a civil action seeking an injunction
against the dispatch of troops and compensation for personal damages. Convinced that theConstitution recognizes citizens' right to live in peace, we each submitted, on two occasions,written statements detailing personal, physical, and mental injuries and demonstrating theimportance of peace to our wellbeing. In spite of this, the Court reached its decision without
examining the evidence, calling witnesses, or examining the Plaintiffs themselves.
The decision handed down in May of this year [2006] stated that "No statute exists stipulating
the right to live in peace, either as a specific right or as a legally protected interest" and rejected
our demands and dismissed our case. For more particulars, please refer to "Comments on theDecision" below.
The statements printed in this booklet represent the core of each person's written statement asrevised for the concluding hearing in March, in which the Plaintiffs stood up, one after another inrelay fashion, and read their pieces over the course of thirty minutes.
We asked the Court for a decision that might advance, by even one step, the cause of securing
the right to live in peace, but sadly, this was not realized. We feel anew the limits of the Japanesejudiciary with its low degree of independence from the government. We take pride, however, inhaving asserted our dissent.
June 2006
The Docket, Submitted Briefs, and Plaintiffs' Statements
1.October 21, 2004Petition Statement Statements of 3 Plaintiffs
2.December 3, 2004Preliminary Brief (1)-1What is occurring in Iraq and what the Self-Defense
Forces are doing there: The actual conditions of the Iraq War andits illegality under international law
Preliminary Brief (2) Injuries sustained by Plaintiffs: Right to livein peace and personal rights Statements of 3 Plaintiffs

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace39

3.February 18, 2005 Preliminary Brief (1)-2What is occurring in Iraq, what the Self-Defense
Forces are doing there: The actual conditions of the Iraq War andits illegality under international law
Preliminary Brief (3)The unconstitutionality and illegality of thedispatch of the Self-Defense Forces: The recklessness of thecabinet in destroying constitutionalism
Statements of 3 Plaintiffs
4.May 13, 2005Preliminary Brief (2)-2Injuries sustained by Plaintiffs
Preliminary Brief (4)What Japan ought to do for Iraq: What constitutes true humanitarian aid
activities?
Statements of 2 Plaintiffs
5.July 14, 2005Preliminary Brief (5)Seeking Explanation
Submission of Proposed Evidence 1
Statements of 2 Plaintiffs
6.September 8, 2005Preliminary Brief (6)Statement of 1 Plaintiff
7.November 17, 2005Submission of Proposed Evidence 2
January 24, 2006Court ruling (petition for the examination of witnesses and Plaintiffs
dismissed)
8.February 2, 2006Statement concerning court procedures
9.March 16, 2006Final Preliminary Brief Statements of 2 attorneys
Statements of 15 Plaintiffs
10. May 11, 2006The decision
Heisei 18 (2006) March 16
Heisei 16 (2004) Number 16912: Case Demanding an Injunction against the Dispatch of
Self-Defense Forces to Iraq
Plaintiff: Ishizaki Atsuko and 14 others
Defendant: The State [the government of Japan]

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

40

Tokyo District Court of Law, Civil Affairs Deliberation 15 System B
The statement of attorney Nakajima MichikoYour Honors, can you not hear them: the voices of pain and sadness coming from the Iraqi
people, and the footsteps of war that are approaching Japan? The plaintiffs and the attorney
before you can hear them clearly. We have brought this lawsuit with the urgent desire of
stopping this development. It is truly a shame that the court has not admitted the testimony of
witnesses and Plaintiffs, but the Plaintiffs have submitted extensive documentary evidence. We
ask that the court read all the documentary evidence and take the time to confront, in silence, thisphotograph of a bloodstained girl. And please do not hand down a decision along the lines of the
Kofu District Court decision, as argued by the State. That self-abnegating decision might as well
be deemed a suicidal action the part of the Court.

The cover of DAYS Japan, inaugural issue (April 4, 2004).

The matters on which we request the Court's decision may be broadly separated into thefollowing two categories:
First, we assert that the deployment of Self-Defense Forces to Iraq is unconstitutional and illegal.
The majority of decisions in peace lawsuits avoid ruling on the constitutionality of the contested
issue. We accordingly ask that the Court not casually sidestep the issue of constitutionality.
Under the separation of powers, the judiciary is given the authority to review theconstitutionality of the actions of the Diet and the government. A representative democracy isoften unable to check laws and government actions that are at odds with the people's will. This isexactly why the judiciary's authority of judicial review is indispensable. In the cases brought
against Prime Minister Koizumi's visits to Yasukuni Shrine, constitutional violation has beenfound numerous times, even though this view appears not in the text of the judgment itself but inthe reasoning. [1]Chief Justice Kamekawa, for example, in the Fukuoka District Court casestated, "If the courts continue to avoid ruling on constitutionality, it is highly likely that theYamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace41

actions in question will be repeated. This Court has accordingly decided to take as its
responsibility a consideration of the constitutionality of the shrine visits." [2]This applies precisely to the question of the constitutionality of the deployment of the SelfDefense Forces. Ever since the Supreme Court avoided a constitutional judgment in the
Sunagawa Incident on the grounds of sovereign immunity, the Self-Defense Forces have
expanded hugely, and now, they have been armed and sent overseas.[3] This is nothing otherthan the result of the judiciary's avoiding its responsibility. Nevertheless, while relying on thedoctrine of sovereign immunity, the Sunagawa decision also stated that if there is "blatant andegregious violation of the Constitution," then the courts needed to pronounce on
constitutionality. In the current case, in which heavily armed Self-Defense Forces have been sent
to an overseas war zone, there is "blatant and egregious violation of the Constitution." The State
calls the deployment humanitarian support for reconstruction, but it is evident that in fact it is
support for America's invasion and occupation of Iraq. This is not only a constitutional violation,
but it is also an illegal act violating the Self-Defense Forces Law and the Special Measures Law[Regarding Humanitarian Reconstruction Assistance Activities and Activities to Support
Ensuring Safety].Unless the deployment of the Self-Defense Forces is declared unconstitutional
and illegal by a judgment from the judiciary at this time, there will be no brakes on Japan's
recklessness.
Fully three years have passed since the invasion of Iraq by the American and British armies.
Security in Iraq has only deteriorated, and people's lives are exposed to danger.
This demonstrates that peace cannot be created by force, that violence begets violence, and thatthe chain of violence only spreads. Therefore, in order to eradicate war, there is nothing to bedone but to follow Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan "renouncing all war." [4] Article 9 istruly a treasure in which Japan should take pride. People throughout the world are beginning toaccord it respect.
The second judgment we ask the court to make is that the plaintiffs' rights have been violated by
the deployment of troops to Iraq, and that they have incurred serious damage.
The State simply denies us standing on the grounds that this is not a legal controversy, but as
already mentioned in our preliminary statements, the only stipulation on this issue occurs in
Article 3 of the Judiciary Law. [5]To interpret Article 3 narrowly and reject the Plaintiffs'
demand would violate the right to access to the courts guaranteed in Article 32 of theConstitution, and would constitute a failure to apply the law. [6]The Plaintiffs claim that the following interests have been denied: (1) the right to live in peace,(2) personal rights, and (3) legally protected interests.
With respect to the right to live in peace, Professor Yamauchi Toshihiro emphasizes in his
written testimony in Statement A-120 that the Preamble to the Constitution provides an explicit
basis for such a right. [7] Please note his opinion that given how other countries recognize
judicial norms in the preambles to their constitutions, there is no reason for Japan alone not to do
the same.In the case at hand, we assert the right to live in peace based on the Preamble, Article 9,Women and Japan’s Political Economy

42

and Article 13. [8]In its response, the State willfully ignores Article 9 and separates the Preamblefrom Article 13 and denies their purport. This distorts the claims of the Plaintiffs and in no way
constitutes a rebuttal.
As to personal rights: for the Plaintiffs, who have lived with the precept of "neither becoming a
victim nor a perpetrator of war" as central to their character formation, these are rights thatcannot be withdrawn.
In the last matter, that of legally protected interests under the State Redress Law, there are many
precedents showing that even those rights not yet explicitly stipulated should be recognized.
About the rights that the Plaintiffs charge have been violated, please, your Honors, listen to their
voices. A decision to the effect that while the "anxiety" caused by leaflets in private mailboxes
constitutes a legally protected interest, the intolerable mental anguish experienced by these
Plaintiffs does not constitute the violation of a legally protected interest, would be a biased
judgment, one surely to be censured by history. [9]In conclusion, I would like to express my hope that you will not issue the sort of decision madein the case of the retrial of the Yokohama Incident, a decision that refused to address neither the
torture committed by the former Special Police Forces nor the responsibility of the judges issuing
the original guilty verdict. [10]Given that one role of the court is to serve as a staunch guardian of the Constitution, we strongly
hope for a judgment that takes even a single step beyond previous judgments in the direction of
the Constitution.
The statement of attorney Owaki Masako
For twelve years, from Heisei 4 to 16 [1992-2004], I participated as a member of the House ofCouncilors in discussions of the Commission on the Constitution. I heard from people in various
walks of life about their views on the country and the Constitution, and I also participated inwork that analyzed each clause. Among the many opinions, the one that struck my heart was that
Article 9 of the Constitution of Japan was a beacon of peace in the world, the object of interest
and envy among the citizens of different countries, and that when Japanese citizens went abroadon peace missions with non-profit organizations, Article 9 served as the basis of the trust granted
them as Japanese by the people of the world. The warm feeling the Plaintiffs hold towards
Article 9 is a feeling shared by the people of the world who hope for peace.
Now, I will argue against the claim that the Plaintiffs have no standing as well as the claim thatthe right to live in peace is not a specific right.
The right to live in peace is a basic human right woven into the Preamble, Article 9, and Article
13 of the Constitution; it is none other than the right that embraces the freedom to pursue peace,to live in peace, and to negate war. It has specificity as the "right to live in a Japan that does notresort to war or force. "This is the brilliant theoretical achievement of constitutional
jurisprudence in postwar Japan. The right to live in peace is a fundamental right in the twentyfirst century.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

43

The Japanese government violated both the Self-Defense Forces Law and the Special Measures
Law Regarding Humanitarian Reconstruction Assistance Activities and Activities to Support
Ensuring Safety when they sent heavily armed forces into what was clearly a war zone in Iraq,
and it is clear that they are supporting the American and British occupation armies' large-scaleslaughter of Iraqi citizens.
It is evident that the invasion of Iraq was in violation of international law. Japanese lives are also
being lost in Iraq. The fear and torment aroused in the Plaintiffs by the deployment of SelfDefense Forces to Iraq constitutes an infringement of each Plaintiff's right to live in peace. This
is nothing other than a direct and indirect violation of both their individual rights and legally
protected interests. Our suit has not been filed for the sake of a merely abstract inquiry into theinterpretation or value of laws.
Finally, I will say a word about the judiciary's avoidance of pronouncing on discretionary actions
by the legislative and administrative branches of government.
Democracy in the Diet is a democracy of majority rule, and there is no guarantee that it will toconform to law. If the opinion of the Court is that dispatching the Self-Defense Forces is apolitical decision to be left to the discretion of the government, then the Court has abrogated its
own judicial role as a constitutional court. Please do not try to avoid judicial review.
The judiciary is the institution vested with the sole and therefore highest authority for theinterpretation and application of the Constitution. In the case at hand, we hope that theconscience and wisdom of the Court and its awareness of its historic role will lead it to assume
the role expected by the law and the people and rule that the right to live in peace has been
violated.
Statements of the Plaintiffs
March 16, 2006
Tokyo District Court of Law, Civil Affairs Deliberation 15 System B
On living in postwar peace
Nagai Yoshiko (born 1935)
Your Honors! My name is Nagai Yoshiko. We fifteen Plaintiffs have filed this lawsuit from theconviction that the dispatch of Self-Defense Force troops to Iraq is a breach of the Constitution
and that the only way to correct this wrongful action on the part of the government is to appeal to
the judgment of the judiciary. When the U.S. government ignored international law and resorted
to armed strikes despite the lack of both evidence and legitimacy, the Japanese government andthe Koizumi administration, ignoring our precious Peace Constitution, decided on full-scalecooperation and sent troops overseas. For this they bear heavy responsibility. We fifteen differ in
our life experiences, belong to different generations, and come from different social
environments, but we have in common our hope for peace and our wish to act on ourWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

44

responsibility as citizens to preserve the peace and to pass on a peaceful Japan to the next
generation. To that end we have made repeated efforts over the years.
Managing to escape the flames of air raids as an elementary school student and dodging
machine-gun fire, I have been able to live in the peace of the postwar era. I am proud to havebeen taught by a national textbook in middle school that the Constitution of Japan has three great
pillars, namely pacifism, popular sovereignty, and fundamental human rights. These are thethoughts that I have brought to this suit. I hope with all my heart that your Honors will show
yourselves to be rightful guardians of the Constitution by finding the government's action
unconstitutional.
The hoped-for examination of each Plaintiff in the suit has been rejected, but on this day, all of
the Plaintiffs would like to express their thoughts, in however limited a fashion. Because time islimited, we will speak one after another.
Memories of the Great Tokyo Air Raids 61 years ago overlap with Iraq
Ueda Tomoko (born 1925)
My name is Ueda Tomoko. Every time I see images in the news from the war in Iraq, the terror I
felt during the Great Tokyo Air Raids of sixty-one years ago is revived." Molotov BreadBaskets," each one filled with dozens of incendiary bombs, rained down by the hundreds and thethousands. I was running about in confusion, trying to escape the flames, when, at the sound of
the explosion of a one-ton bomb, my body froze. I cannot forget my friend who died, suffocatedby the smoke.
Now, the same thing is happening in Iraq. Women and children are shot, innocent citizens areburned and robbed of life. The Iraq War is fresh salt rubbed in my old wounds from sixty-one
years ago.
I cannot bear the anguish of knowing that Japan, with its Peace Constitution, is involved in thiswar.
We have been apologizing to the peoples of Asiaand seeking reconciliation and peaceful coexistence
Shimizu Sumiko (born 1928)
My name is Shimizu Sumiko. The Manchurian Incident, the Sino-Japanese War, and the Second
World War filled my first seventeen years. Loyalty to the emperor and the state and militarism
were drummed into me. My days were spent participating in lantern parades to celebrate military
victories, making care packages for soldiers who were overseas, seeing soldiers off, making
thousand-stitch belts, and volunteer labor. The use of the enemy's language, English, wasprohibited. There were daily air raid drills, practice sessions with bamboo spears on scarecrows,
helping out with the farm work—even making charcoal—at the homes of soldiers gone to theYamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace45

front, and getting sent off as volunteer corps to work in munitions factories. In school, there wereno classes, and not being able to study was the hardest part.
I experienced the 1945 great air raid of Osaka and the air raid of Fukui. People running in
confusion, trying to escape the hail of incendiary bombs wrapping the city in fire; American
soldiers in low-altitude airplanes firing at them with machine guns; fallen bodies piling up;
mothers fleeing with bloody babies on their backs; burnt and festering corpses lying in thestreets; and me, also fleeing, covered in water-soaked bedding. Everything about that timeoverlaps with the experience of the Iraqi people now. Whenever I think of the Iraqi women andchildren who are exposed to incomparably greater destructive forces, I cannot bear the pain.
I held a seat in the Diet for twelve years. During that time, we sincerely reflected upon andapologized for the infringement of human rights and the virtual enslavement of colonial
populations that took place under Japan's colonial rule and war of aggression. We have madeefforts toward reconciliation and peaceful coexistence with the peoples of Asia, and we haverepeatedly said to them that Article 9 in the Constitution stands as proof of our pledge never to
let these things be repeated. We must immediately stop the dispatch of troops to Iraq, which
violates the Self-Defense Forces Law and the Constitution.
The shock of learning that nothing was told to us during the war
Nozaki Mitsue (born 1932)
My name is Nozaki Mitsue. What scares me more than anything is the fact that a nation thatwages war will come to rule over the hearts and minds of its citizens. I didn't even know thatduring the war, places around Japan other than Tokyo had been subjected to air raids. No matter
how bad the war situation, the news shouted, "Glorious results on the battlefield" with "Ourlosses are slight" tacked on at the end. Even with the extreme exhaustion caused by the nightly
air raids, no one could say, "I can't take any more!" We couldn't challenge the government's
assertion that victory was assured because Japan was a country of the gods, ruled by an emperor
from an unbroken imperial line. Jeered at as unpatriotic or traitors, monitored by the authorities,
the armed forces, society, schools, and neighborhood organizations, we were roped into uselessdrills with bamboo spears or long-handled swords. Children during wartime knew nothing of thereal state of things and were made to believe whole-heartedly that we would win. It was
forbidden, like a crime, to have thoughts of one's own.
Now, I feel the mindset of that time is being revived. When the "Law to Protect the People in
Conditions of Armed Attack" [passed 2006—Tr.] was being debated, I recalled the mandated
destruction of buildings during the war. This was allegedly to make a buffer zone to control the
spread of fires. In Hiroshima, under the scorching sun, with no protective gear, middle school
students dashing off to perform that task suffered the direct hit of the atomic bomb. They werethirteen years old, the same age as me. I didn't know this until long after the end of the war.
When I think about what I was doing at the time, my heart aches. The shock of not having
known, the shock of not having been informed—this was the case with Okinawa, the Nanking
Massacre, Unit 731, and the comfort women—I learned about these things much, much later.
War is also about this kind of restriction on people's psyches and on what they know.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

46

To realize a democratic society, our unflagging efforts are necessary
Kase Satsuki (born 1935)
My name is Kase Satsuki. When I was in my first year of middle school, I came across a
textbook called The Story of the New Constitution.The textbook spoke to us, like this: "Now, thewar has finally ended. Don't you agree that you never want to experience such terrible sad
feelings again? ….To engage in war is to destroy human beings. It means wrecking the goodthings in the world." How refreshing it was! The textbook went on to say, "Two decisions weremade in our new Constitution to make sure the country of Japan would never wage war again."
Even now I can vividly recall what the textbook said about the renunciation of war capabilities
and the exercise of military force, and how forcefully it stated, "Japan has done the right thing,ahead of other countries."
In 1952, when I was seventeen, there was a special election for the upper house in Shizuoka
Prefecture where I lived, and I became involved in the investigation of systematic election fraud,
which I considered the "destruction of the fundamentals of democracy." Thanks to this, I was
ostracized. Having gone through that experience, I felt keenly that in order to realize the peacefuland democratic society promoted by the Constitution, we the sovereign people had to makeunflagging efforts. Thereafter, having taken part in long campaigns in a variety of postwar
citizens' movements and peace movements over the course of half a century, I feel ever moredeeply that the principle of the Peace Constitution, which aims for "the realization of peace
without depending on military power," is a compass not only for realizing peace in Japan but
throughout the world, and that our Constitution is a treasure we should boast of to the world. The
past several years, however, with the passage of three emergency laws, the Special AntiTerrorism Law and other war-related laws, and the strong-arm tactics used to dispatch troops toIraq, I cannot help feeling an impending crisis in which the Constitution will be annihilated.
Through the practice of such unconstitutional politics, Japan is being distorted into "a country
that is able to go to war" once again and this, I believe, must not be permitted.
Through involvement with the Japanese military "comfort women"
Ueda Sakiko (born 1939)
My name is Ueda Sakiko. In the Asian Pacific War, Japan not only killed an estimated twenty
million innocent people, but it also engaged in outrageous antihuman practices such as forced labor,
military sexual slavery in the form of "comfort women," the Nanking Massacre, and medical
experimentation on living bodies. In particular, I cannot stop thinking about those women who, at
the height of their youth, were forced to become sex slaves as the Japanese military's "comfort
women," who were robbed of their lives by that experience. Most of these women were forcibly
taken from Japanese colonies or occupied territories, or tricked and taken away, to be trampled uponas the object of soldiers' sexual violence every day. Even after the war ended, there was no restoring
anything like a normal human life for these women. Finally, in the 1990s, a group of courageous
victims denounced the comfort women system and sued the Japanese government, but all theiractions have been dismissed. The United Nations' Commission on Human Rights, Sub-commission
on the Prevention of Discrimination against Women, has demanded a fundamental settlement from

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace47

the Japanese government, but the Japanese government has made no effort even to respond to thevictims' demands for justice.
In Iraq there have already been over one hundred thousand deaths in the prevailing state of war.
In addition, the terrible torture in Abu Ghraib Prison and other human rights violations arecoming to light together with a rapid increase in sexual violence against women. As a woman, I
find these things unbearable. It is out of the question for the Japanese government to becollaborating in consigning women to such a situation. Japan must immediately cooperate in therestitution of the human rights of women.
In the burdens of my father and my uncle,
the origins of the movement to advocate human rights
Tsuwa Keiko (born 1945)
My name is Tsuwa Keiko. My father was an officer in the Kwantung Army. He moved fromplace to place in battles throughout Asia, and even though he returned immediately after the endof the war, a military tribunal found him guilty of POW abuse. The Chinese my father taught me
was the words, "Guniang lai lai" ("Miss, come here").The tone in which he said this was
unpleasant to my child's ear, but as I grew up and found out about the atrocities of the Japanesemilitary throughout Asia, it became a source of anguish for me. I did not hear anything about that
period from my uncle, a military policeman, but in later years, my father sought redemption inreligion.
Today, sixty-one years after the end of the war, the Japanese government has forgotten the acts
committed by Japan in the past. It is not only legitimizing war and accepting the prime minister's
worship at Yasukuni Shrine, but it is going so far as to introduce explicit plans to revise theConstitution in an attempt to make it so that Japan can once again invade other countries. I
absolutely cannot forgive this trend toward policies leading to the quagmire of war, abetting
America's unjustified attack on Iraq with an army called defense forces. Just thinking of what the
Self-Defense Forces, now turned into an army, will do on the battlefield of Iraq makes my heartache. Who can state positively that they will not conduct themselves in the same way as theJapanese army of the past? Who can promise that women, the elderly, and children will not
become casualties on the battlefield?
In solidarity with the women who suffer under the value system of male dominance
Kobayashi Michiko (born 1947)
My name is Kobayashi Michiko. I work in a law office. In most cases where women come toconsult about divorce, there is a violent husband. A woman from Hokkaido, tossed out of doors
in arctic temperatures while pregnant; a person who had been kicked and had her bones broken;
women who had been coerced into sexual intercourse: these women are all deeply scarred not
only on their bodies, but in their hearts. Violence not only destroys women's self-esteem, but thefear and despair drive the women into self-abnegation and cause them to lose the will to live.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

48

The male chauvinist thinking and values displayed here are similar to what happens in war.
Citizens are choked by gag orders, thought-control is put into effect, and violence is glorified:
this is the system of war. The images from the reports on the miserable state of affairs in Iraq
overlap with the image of women suffering from domestic violence, and this tears at my heart.
Scarred by these images, I have begun to suffer from daily nightmares. I am currently on
medication. Nothing can cure me other than the smiling faces of the Iraqi people. There is no
cure other than images of an Iraq in which life is not threatened, in which everyday life has been
restored. Among the American soldiers who participated in the war, I hear that the number of
those who suffer from exposure to depleted uranium shells and those suffering from stress isincreasing. It has also been reported that three Self-Defense Force members returned from Iraq
have committed suicide, and there are many who are suffering from trauma.
The lives of all people, from every country, are equally precious. Surely, it is the role of theJapanese government to spread the spirit of Article 9 of the Constitution.
Let's change the way we fight terrorism under the Peace Constitution
Niwa Masayo (born 1947)
My name is Niwa Masayo. I was born in 1947.I am proud of being the same age as theConstitution and the Fundamental Law of Education. Accordingly, in the days when I was ateacher, I thought about how I wanted to clearly convey this pride to the children. I used to say tothem, "Just because we don't have an army doesn't mean that we have to be afraid. Through ourdecision to renounce war, we have chosen the path of walking together with the peoples of theworld."I am deeply hurt by the fact that the Japanese government is actively involved in the attack on
Iraq and in the inhumane occupation of that country.
In particular, after the incident in London last July, I have begun to feel that the fear that I
myself, my family, or my friends could also become the object of an armed attack has become
more realistic.
I want to change the way we fight terrorism. The Japanese Constitution, which proudly
repudiates war, is at once the greatest and most reliable foundation for responding to terrorism.
Already, many Iraqis have been victimized, and the number of dead and wounded American
soldiers is also increasing. Japanese have also died. The government must withdraw from the war
as soon as possible and move towards the realization of peace.
The fear of terror from working in a British company
Yuzuki Yasuko (born 1948)
My name is Yuzuki Yasuko. I don't know war firsthand, but I heard repeatedly about thesufferings caused by war and the preciousness of peace from my grandmother, who experienced
the Sino-Japanese War, the Russo-Japanese War, and the Second World War; from my mother,Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace49

who lost her son and husband in the war; and from my older sister, who experienced compulsory
school evacuation and evacuation to live with distant relatives. My mother, who turned 85 thisyear, often says that when she heard the emperor's surrender broadcast, she thought, "It's good
we lost the war. Now we'll have more rations. The military will no longer treat us like worms."
I work for a U.K.-owned company. Ever since the Self-Defense Forces were dispatched to Iraq,
the company doors have been kept locked. This is not only because it is a corporation based in
Britain, which joined the U.S. war of aggression against Iraq, but because Japan has also becomea target for terrorism. In addition, the entire staff was sent e-mails pointing to the "danger ofriding the subways," and we were told to be "careful about going home during the commuter
rush hour." This is a danger that has arisen since the Self-Defense Forces were dispatched toIraq. It is also said that after London, Japan is at risk. We will have to live every day in fear until
the withdrawal of the Self-Defense Forces.
When I travel in Asia, I meet people concerned with remembering the brutal acts of the Japanese
armed forces here and there, but even given that history, I realize I was accepted because Japan
has a Peace Constitution. Over the past few years with Prime Minister Koizumi repeating his
visits to Yasukuni Shrine, I have sensed the feeling towards Japanese people becoming worse in
China, which I visit every year. I am afraid Japan will choose a path that will cut it off from therest of Asia.
As a second-generation atomic bomb victim,
I think the use of depleted uranium shells is unforgivable
Mishima Hiroko (born 1949)
My name is Mishima Hiroko.I am a second-generation atomic bomb victim .My mother, who at
age twenty was enrolled in a Higher Girls' School Specialist Course, was an atomic bomb victim
in Nagasaki. Even though she herself was hurt, she went out to help numerous regular-course
students who had been bombed in the Mitsubishi Armament works.
When she wanted to go back to rescue more people, she couldn't move, and after several days,
she thought, "If I'm going to die anyway, let it be at home," so she went home. For many years,
she was tormented by the thought that in leaving Nagasaki, she had not properly mourned thedead or rescued her juniors. When my mother was a teacher, she continued to express thesethoughts, and I feel my own life came as an extension of those feelings. Each time I myself gavebirth, I thought, "What if the effects of the Flash show up in this baby…."It is precisely for thisreason that I want to pass on to my children a peaceful society and to work to prevent therepetition of such tragedies.
Thinking of the effects of residual radioactivity, I believe it is because my mother left Nagasaki
that I am here today. That is why I cannot forgive America for using depleted uranium shells.
Since residual radioactivity from the dust caused by depleted uranium shells can reach 1,000
kilometers in every direction, the people of Iraq could be driven to extinction. Due to the samedepleted uranium shells of the Gulf War, deaths have also occurred among the American soldiersWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

50

who participated in the attack, and disabled children have been born as well. The effect onchildren is serious. If we are going to talk about providing reconstruction aid, we should
concentrate our energy on research to remove radiation. That would be humanitarian support.
I want to stop Japan from turning into a garrison state
Sugita Yoshiko (born 1951)
My name is Sugita Yoshiko. It is clear that the Iraq War is unjustified. The dispatch of SelfDefense Force troops to Iraq is also clearly in violation of the Constitution. The use of napalm
bombs, chemical gas, nerve gas, anesthetic gas, and other poison gases is turning Iraq into atesting ground for illegal weapons. It is said that the internal organs of Iraqis have been extracted
and dispatched to America, so the nation acting inhumanely is in fact America itself. Due to aneffort to control information, Al-Jazeera, that invaluable resource, has been blocked. If we canonly receive one-sided information from the U.S. military, the truth is likely to be concealed.
While the armies of other countries are being withdrawn, Prime Minister Koizumi has decided toextend the deployment of the Self-Defense Forces in Iraq. What a reckless, foolish act. The silent
media, a prime minister servile towards the United States, the profit-seeking arms traders, thehypnotized citizens: I want to stop Japan from turning into a garrison state. Learning from the
Costa Rican Supreme Court Constitutional Chamber that forced the cancellation of support for
the United States, may this Court deliver a constitutional judgment showing the discernment of
the Japanese judiciary.
The dispatch of troops coincides with the militarization of the schools
Ishida Kuniko (born 1951)
My name is Ishida Kuniko.I myself have no experience of war, but through living with twochildren who are seventeen and nineteen, I feel keenly the gravity of a person's life. Therefore, I
am intensely angered by the distorted citation of the Preamble to the Constitution that Prime
Minister Koizumi presented in justification of sending the Self-Defense Forces to Iraq. Such
invocation destroys the spirit of pacifism and of internationalism; it is an insult to the Peace
Constitution I take pride in.
From about the time the Japanese government began preparing to dispatch the Self-Defense
Forces to Iraq, in classrooms we witnessed a cessation of respect for a diversity of perspectives
and saw the dominance of a culture that attempts to control even the hearts of children throughenforced salutes to the Rising Sun flag and singing of the Kimi ga yo [the national anthem—Tr.].Sex education, which promoted individual autonomy, the establishment of the human rights
of women, and respect for the human rights of others, has been subjected to intense attacks. The
state and local governments, by imposing particular values, are turning schools into places thatteach obedience and the submersion of individuality.
As a citizen of Japan, which is taking part in a war that tortures the people of Iraq, I am deeply
sorry and feel tormented by emotional pain. At the same time, my family and I cannot get over

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace51

the fear that we ourselves might be subjected to a terrorist attack. As a mother and as a memberof the citizenry who have general responsibility for the education of children, I am deeply
troubled by the militarization of the schools.
Having experienced the terror of 9/11, I plead together with the life granted then
Nakano Keiko (born 1969)
My name is Nakano Keiko. I was in New York where my husband had been sent on business,and so I experienced the 9/11 terror attacks.
Fortunately, since we were far from our apartment at the time of the attacks, we were not directly
affected, but our apartment was close to the World Trade Center. It was two weeks later that wewere able to enter our apartment. Even though we had managed to get through the rigorous
security check, I did not have any proof of residence on me, so I was accompanied into myapartment by a distraught soldier. Treated like a criminal, I wailed in bitterness and sorrow.
Ashes containing asbestos had gathered by the windows.
After 9/11, I think all New Yorkers were in a state of PTSD.A group of 9/11 victims' families(Peaceful Tomorrows) demanded that no war be waged in the victims' names, but Bush kept
saying, "We will not give in to terrorists."
The daughter conceived in the place where 2,700 people lost their lives is now three years old.
Hers is a life conceived in an apartment permeated with foul odors, where I shut myself in,
feeling guilt at being alive as well as gratitude for our good fortune, and struggling to understandhow I should go on living. For my daughter's sake, too, I must create a peaceful world where
people need not live in fear of war and terrorism. I beg the Court to hand down a courageousdecision such that Japan will not be a target of terrorism, that the blood of the citizens of theworld need not be spilled.
I cannot appear in court today due to the imminent birth of my second child. But even though I
am not in the courtroom, I am giving my full attention to the outcome of this trial. For the sake of
my daughter and the child that will soon arrive, as well as for the sake of all the world's children,
I place my hopes for peace in your Honors' courage.
The thoughts of one who has continued in the grassroots peace movement
Ishizaki Atsuko (born 1924)
My name is Ishizaki Atsuko. My youth was passed in wartime. When I was in grammar school,
we prepared care packages for soldiers on the front and took part in lantern parades to celebrate
the fall of Nanking. High-spirited with visions of victory, we knew nothing about the Nanking
Massacre or the military comfort women. We were ecstatic to hear the results of the attack on
Pearl Harbor from Imperial Headquarters. After that, air raids became frequent, daily provisions
became scarce, and we had to start mixing our meager rations of rice with wild grass to makeporridge to stave off hunger.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

52

I became a teacher at a girls' school where I had been evacuated, but instead of teaching, my role
was to accompany students who had been mobilized to help with farm work or to work infactories in Yokosuka. When we were exhausted by air raids day and night and utterly drained ofvitality, the atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the war that hadclaimed over twenty million lives ended. But we had in our grasp the unexpected treasure of thePeace Constitution.
We had thought there would be no more war, but the next thing we knew, there was the U.S.Japan Security Treaty, the Self-Defense Forces, and then the deployment of troops to Iraq. Since
the 1960 struggle over the security treaty when I felt compelled to take my five-year-old
daughter to demonstrate at the Diet, I have continued my anti-war activities. Now I am past theage of eighty, but I intend to continue speaking out against war for the rest of my life.
I have something to say to the prime minister who insists that dispatching forces to Iraq is aservice to the world community as called for by the Constitution, and to the young folks
watching television who think that war is cool. War is an activity in which people rob each otherof life. Not just soldiers sent to battle, but young children and the elderly also get caught up inwar, and the chain of violence has no benefit. We who have experienced the horrors of war do
not want our children and grandchildren to go through the same thing. We should stop violating
our Constitution by being servile to America in its reckless war in Iraq. Instead, we should
withdraw immediately and make a contribution to international peace that does not involve
dispatching the Self-Defense Forces. This is the judgment I ask your Honors to make.
I want a society that actualizes Japan's Constitution,
gained as a result of war
Ueda Tomoko (born in 1925)
My name is Ueda Tomoko. I would like to say one final word. I was born in Taisho 14, the year
1925.My adolescence and youth coincided with the war. Can this court imagine what it is like tolive with hunger and fear for your life, to feel that a single utterance could put you at risk? Now
the politicians and elites of this country who do not know war are lightly discussing matters thatwill lead to war. A life once lost cannot be regained.
The Japanese people have a duty to all who sacrificed their lives in the war to uphold the visionand lofty ideals of the Constitution of Japan, which we gained as a result of defeat. In order topass on to the next generation a society that will actualize this Constitution, I want to bequeath
these words to the generations that do not know war. I want them to be aware of the importanceof peace and to continue our efforts to preserve it. I want them to know that it will be too lateonce that peace has been lost. I want to entrust these words to the judiciary, the guardians of theConstitution, as the last testament of Ueda Tomoko.
Final Preliminary Brief
March 16, 2006

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace
Tokyo District Court of Law, Civil Affairs Deliberation 15 System B
Nakajima Michiko, Attorney et al. (7 other individuals)
Table of Contents
Introduction
Section 1 Regarding Defendant Exhibit No. 7 (Kofu District Court Judgment)
1. Grounds for citing Kofu District Court judgment
2. "Findings of fact" for Kofu judgment
3. Rejection of right to live in peace
4. Rejection of personal rights and personal interests
5. Rejection of claims for compensation
6. Significance of Kofu District Court judgment
Section 2 Issue for judgment 1
Constitutionality and legality of dispatching troops to Iraq
1. Significance of the power of judicial review
2. Comparison with lawsuits contesting constitutionality of Yasukuni Shrine visits
3. Necessity for judicial review
4. Representative democracy and judicial review
5. Duty to uphold constitutionalism
6. Troop deployment in Iraq—unambiguous constitutional violation
7. Dispatching of SDF to Iraq also violates Special Measures Law for Iraq
8. State of affairs in Iraq and SDF activities
9. Withdrawal of Ground SDF and shift to new government
10. Iraq and significance of the Japanese Constitution

53

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

54

Section 3 Issue for judgment 2
Plaintiff interests violated by dispatching troops to Iraq
1. Standing and jurisdiction (Article 23, Constitution)
2. Right to live in peace
3. Personal rights
4. Legally protected interests
Section 4Claims for relief
1.War responsibility of judges
2.The courts as guardians of the law
Introduction
Your Honors, do you not hear the footsteps of war? To the Plaintiffs, the sound is loud and clear.
War is getting ever closer. Any day now, it threatens to take over our everyday lives and wreak
its horrors on our youth and unborn children. We sense the approaching danger. Keenly feelingthe need to halt this relentless tide, the Plaintiffs have brought this case before the court. Timeand again, we have submitted briefs and detailed the charges. But, despite these efforts, theDefendant, the Government of Japan, has not deigned to contest the charges, much less answer
them in court. They have only submitted judgments delivered in other cases as exhibits
supporting their position and have remained virtually silent in court.
Under these circumstances, the Court rejected the request to examine the Plaintiffs' witnesses
and the Plaintiffs themselves. Given that the Plaintiffs have submitted abundant documentary
evidence, this is truly deplorable. We sincerely hope that this esteemed Court will carefully
examine the evidence and hand down a ruling that will allow it to fulfill the historic role
expected of it.
Section 1 Regarding Defendant Exhibit No. 7 (Kofu District Court Judgment)
Grounds for citing Kofu District Court Judgment
The Defendant State has submitted Defendant Exhibit No. 1 and Defendant Exhibit No. 7 aspertaining to this case. While these exhibits consist of court rulings or decisions, they differ inmany respects from this case in that they are decisions on the Special Measures for Terrorism
Law and administrative litigation, and moreover, the reasons for the claims made in many ofthese cases are different. Of these two exhibits, Defendant Exhibit No. 7 consisting of the Kofu
District Court judgment is similar to this particular case, and the Defendant has also requested
that the court refer to it in its Explanation of Filed Exhibits (4).As such, the following statements

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

55

proceed with arguments against the judgment in the Kofu District Court as a way of contesting
the Defendant's claims in this case.
Findings of fact" for the judgment
The judgment by the Kofu District Court is premised on the following findings of fact (facts
evident to the Court):The Self-Defense Forces (SDF) have successively dispatched units to Iraq
since December 18, 2003.Troops are authorized to carry out activities that primarily consist ofrestoring and supplying medical, water, and public facilities and transporting related goods, etc.
(humanitarian and reconstruction support) and supporting other nations in their activities torestore security and stability in Iraq.
The Defendant, however, has made no attempt whatsoever to verify whether the SDF is engaged
in the above activities. The Plaintiffs, have, on the contrary, established that the SDF is notengaged in these activities. As proof, we have submitted the following exhibits, which establish
the fact that the SDF is engaged in neither water supply nor in public facility reconstruction, etc.:
Plaintiff Exhibit No. 105 ("Humanitarian Water Support—Japan Gets Lapped," Tokyo Shimbun[11]); Plaintiff Exhibit 107 ("Justification for Deployment Getting Fuzzy," Tokyo Shimbun);
Plaintiff Exhibit No. 108 ("Increased Security for Ground Forces," Asahi Shimbun); Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 109, 1, 2 (statement of questions by Representative Kazuo Inoue, House ofRepresentatives, and government response);Plaintiff Exhibit No. 110, 1, 2 (statement ofquestions by Representative Tomoko Abe, House of Representatives, and government response);and Plaintiff Exhibit No. 76 (Watai Takeharu's documentary film Little Birds [Ritoru baazu]).In
addition, the Plaintiffs have submitted Plaintiff Exhibit No. 77, 1, 2 (Watai Takeharu's
documentary film Destroyed Friendship [Hakai shita yuko]; Takato Nahoko's What's Really
Happening in Iraq Now [Iraku de ima hontoni okotte iru koto]), etc.These exhibits establish thatSDF deployment in Iraq has changed Iraqi sentiment toward the Japanese—from amity toenmity—and that it is contributing to a decline in public order and safety.
In making its judgment, the Kofu District Court, without examining the evidence presented,
simply asserted that SDF engagement in the activities for which they had been dispatched
constituted "facts evident to the Court."The ruling is appalling in its negligence of the most basic
rule of fact-finding, that is, examination of evidence.
Rejection of Right to Live in Peace(A) The Kofu District Court Judgment rejects the Plaintiffs' right to live in peace, the right topursue peace, and the right to live in a Japan that does not exercise the use of force or engage inwar. The arguments put forth by the Plaintiffs in the Kofu District Court are not necessarily thesame as those of the Plaintiffs in this case, but the Defendant State offers similar substantiation
for its position in both cases. For this reason, we cite the Kofu District Court's Judgment below
as a means of rebutting these points.
The Judgment cites the following in its rejection of the right to live in peace:Women and Japan’s Political Economy

56(1) The concept of peace is necessarily open to divergent interpretations depending on a person's
philosophy, beliefs, worldview, and values. Based on different ways of thinking, the specificmeans and methods to realize peace also vary.
(2) This is evident from the fact that the Plaintiffs are strongly opposed to the Special Measures
Law passed by the Diet, which is entrusted by the people to act on their behalf. According to thislegislation, its aim is "to contribute to the peace and security of international society, including
Japan."(3) The Plaintiffs assert that the Constitution unequivocally employs the term "demilitarizedpeace" as the means by which to realize peace, but the concept of "demilitarized peace" is also
unavoidably open to divergent interpretation.
(4) As a result, when we refer to the present Constitution, whether the Preamble or Article 9, it is
not possible to know immediately what concept of peace and what means and methods ofattaining peace are legitimate, or which ones superior.
(B) Objections to the above reasons
It can only be said that the reasons given above by the Kofu District Court in its ruling are utterly
appalling in their disregard for the Constitution. In past so-called "peace lawsuits," some lower
courts have rejected the people's right to live in peace, but none have disregarded theConstitution to this extent or treated it with such contempt.
The reason cited in (1) above might be plausible if the Preamble and Article 9 of the Constitution
were regarded as nonexistent and the issue were limited to a consideration of individual views,
beliefs, etc.; but if we take the current Constitution as our premise, it is not possible to assert that
there are diverse means and methods of concretely realizing peace and that various ideas can be
put into practice. Regardless of how diverse individual views and beliefs may be, when theConstitution sets forth only one ideal and the means or method by which to achieve it, it isincumbent upon the state (including the judiciary) to abide by it. A ruling that refuses to do so,such as the above-mentioned Judgment, is one that fails to uphold the Constitution.
The reasons cited in (2) are grossly mistaken and logically flawed. First, it is claimed that theSpecial Measures Law for Iraq was passed by the Diet, which is entrusted by the people to act on
their behalf, with the aim of contributing to the peace and security of the international society,including Japan, but the people of Japan have not entrusted the Diet to pass this special measureslegislation for Iraq. In the upcoming elections, the special measures legislation for Iraq has notbeen put before the people for debate, and public opinion polls invariably show that a majority ofthe people opposed to the deployment of SDF troops to Iraq (Defendant Exhibit No. 106).
Second, the Plaintiffs are strongly opposed to the Special Measures Law for Iraq because it is aviolation of the Constitution, not because of their individual worldviews or values. To reduce theassertion of Constitutional violation to a question of worldview, and to then switch the argument
to one about the basis for "diversity" betrays an illogic so disgraceful that one is tempted to avert
one's eyes.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

57

The reason cited in (3) above is based on the claim that the notion of "demilitarized peace" isunavoidably open to divergent interpretation, but Article 9, Paragraphs 1 and 2, unequivocallyasserts a "demilitarized peace" in stating that "land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war
potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."
This law was confirmed and enacted by a constitutional assembly and clearly explained to thepeople in Plaintiff Exhibit No. 1, The Story of the New Constitution [Atarashii kenpo no hanashi]and other materials. Subject to the government's agenda, the interpretation of Article 9 has sincechanged, but the constitutional provisions themselves have not been revised and do not admit ofambiguous or equivocal interpretations. Thus, although political positions may effect changes ininterpretation, it is not to be expected that judges, who are bound by duty to honor theConstitution, simply follow suit.
Rejection of personal rights and personal interests(A) Grounds given in Kofu District Court Judgment
The Kofu District Court judgment rejects the allegation that the plaintiffs' personal rights andpersonal interests have been violated on the following grounds:(1) The troop deployment does not directly require Plaintiffs to carry out a duty or achieve a
result; nor is there the risk or fear of endangering the Plaintiffs' lives or violating their persons.
Even assertions of the rising risk of terrorist attacks based on the diverse motives and causes
behind terrorist acts cannot be verified in terms of concrete and realistic risk.
(2) It can be surmised that the Plaintiffs harbor strong aversion to the troop deployment and that
this could plausibly be construed as mental anguish. This sentiment, however, should be situatedin the realm of emotion—of feelings of righteous indignation, displeasure, irritation,
disappointment, etc.—arising from opposition to measures and policies decided andimplemented by the state under a system of representative democracy that conflict withindividually held beliefs, convictions, and interpretations of the Constitution, etc. This sort ofmental anguish is inevitable when decisions are made according to the principle of majority rule,and should either be redressed through activities directed at criticizing state policy and seeking
wider acceptance of the legitimacy of one's own understanding of the issue, or endured as anecessary aspect of life under representative democracy. As such, however severe the mental
anguish may be in subjective terms, the private emotions of individuals cannot be deemed as
meriting protection under the law and cannot be construed as infringing on personal rights orexceeding the limits of forbearance that are generally expected by society at large.
(B) Objections to grounds given above
According to the reason cited in (1) above, the diversity of motives and causes of terrorist attacks
makes it impossible to verify with certainty whether the concrete and realistic risk of terrorist
attacks has increased. It is difficult to contain one's amazement at such a statement. The Plaintiffs
are not asserting that there is a general risk of terrorism, but rather that armed groups haveprotested the assistance given by Japan's SDF to the U.S. invasion of Iraq and have named Japanas a target for reprisal (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 104), and that in actuality, indiscriminate terrorist

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

58

attacks have occurred in Spain and Britain, nations that have deployed troops in Iraq. Are thejudges who refuse to recognize this danger suggesting that they are in a position to guarantee thesafety of Japanese nationals?
This judgment, which denies the rising risk of indiscriminate terrorism, completely rejects thePlaintiffs' claim that the troop deployment to Iraq has generated feelings of anxiety and fear that
their lives and personal safety are endangered.
The fear of terrorism is a constant subject of discussion in the United States, and many sharefeelings of anxiety. In Japan, a nation which is supporting the United States, there is undeniably
good reason to fear terrorism and feel anxious
As seen in the reason cited in (2), a significant part of the judgment calls for forbearance
regarding all acts of the Diet and the government in the name of representative democracy. It isprecisely because we have a representative democracy that the judiciary is given the authority todetermine questions of constitutionality, and this point will be addressed below. As stated above,
however, the people of Japan have not mandated the Diet to pass the Special Measures Law for
Iraq or to dispatch the SDF to Iraq, and these actions are opposed by a majority of the people.
This indicates that representative democracy in Japan is becoming defunct, and judges who
nevertheless declare that we should endure decisions of the Diet because they are based on thewill of the majority have repudiated the very principles of democracy.
5.Rejection of claims for compensation
The Kofu District Court Judgment, in rejecting the Plaintiffs' demand for compensation,
acknowledges that under the State Redress Law, Article 1, Paragraph 1, illegal acts committed
by the state for which compensation may be demanded, consist of violations not only against
established rights, but also against those that are not yet clearly established as legally protectedrights in cases where their violation may be deemed illegal; and that when the mental anguish of
an individual exceeds the limits of endurance that are generally expected by society at large,
there are times when personal rights should be legally protected, and that depending on themanner and degree of infringement, there is room for acknowledging that an illegal act has takenplace. Nevertheless, it states that because the right to live in peace and pursue peace can beconsidered neither a concrete right nor interest, it is not possible for these rights to be violated,
and for this reason rejects the Plaintiffs' demands.
It is, however, manifestly contradictory to state in the first half of a judgment that even whensome rights are not yet established as concrete rights, the mental anguish of an individual may
sometimes require legal protection, and then to state in the second half that because the right tolive in peace and the right to pursue peace are not concrete rights or interests, the demand forcompensation is groundless. The judgment also rejects the demand for compensation because it
is impossible to imagine a situation in which the Plaintiffs' personal rights and personal interests
have been infringed by the dispatching of the SDF to Iraq. The judgment makes no mention,
however, why it would be not be possible to imagine such a situation. The lapse in reasoning isblatant.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace59

6.Significance of the Kofu District Court Judgment
As stated above, the judgment of the Kofu District Court is tantamount to the judges abandoning
their responsibility to the law and announcing the suicide of the judiciary. We only hope thatsuch a judgment will not be delivered in this case.
Section 2 Issue for judgment—the constitutionality and legality of dispatching troops to
Iraq
Significance of judicial review
Under the separation of powers set forth in the Constitution, the judiciary exercises its authority
independently of the legislative and administrative branches. Article 76, Paragraph 3 states, "Alljudges shall be independent in the exercise of their conscience and shall be bound only by thisConstitution and the laws." According to Article 99, judges have the obligation to respect anduphold the Constitution. Furthermore, Article 81 gives the courts the power of judicial review,
and under the separation of powers, the judiciary has been established to determine whether laws
or dispositions are in conformity with the Constitution. As stated above, in representative
democracies, laws and ordinances as well as government actions will often conflict with the willof the people, and for this reason, the judiciary's exercise of judicial review is a necessary andessential practice for ensuring order consistent with the Constitution.
This lawsuit asserts the dispatching of the SDF to Iraq to be a blatant and egregious violation of
the Constitution. Many judgments only involve determining whether the courts have a particularpower to judge a particular case, but this case seeks a judgment on whether dispatching troops to
Iraq is constitutional. For the courts to evade making a judgment on constitutionality istantamount to the judiciary's abandoning its role in government.
Comparison with lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of Yasukuni Shrine visits
Concurrent with this lawsuit regarding the unconstitutionality of SDF deployment to Iraq, there
are lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of Prime Minister Koizumi's visits to Yasukuni
Shrine. One common aspect of these lawsuits is that the courts have, in both cases, dismissedcompensation claims by the plaintiffs, asserting that their legal interests have not been violated
and that they are therefore not entitled to damages.
While dismissing compensation claims by the plaintiffs, the court cases regarding theconstitutionality of the Yasukuni Shrine visits differ in several notable respects from the current
case on the constitutionality of troop deployment to Iraq. As will be discussed below, thejudgments by the Sendai High Court, the Fukuoka District Court, and the Osaka High Court statein their reasoning that Yasukuni Shrine visits are either unconstitutional or possibly
unconstitutional. Even in those cases in which the courts declined to discuss constitutionality intheir reasoning, evidence regarding plaintiffs' damages or the meaning of Prime Minister
Koizumi's Yasukuni Shrine visits was examined concretely.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

60

There is criticism in some quarters of the Osaka High Court Judgment (which dismissed
Plaintiffs' compensation claims but nonetheless judged the shrine visits to be unconstitutional in
its reasoning) on the principle that courts, having dismissed plaintiffs' demands forcompensation, should not then engage in needless distraction by pronouncing the visits
unconstitutional.
Nevertheless, it stands to reason that courts, when directly confronted with the reality of
unconstitutional or illegal situations, should attempt in various ways to exercise the powers
vested in them by the people.
In the past, when former Taiwanese soldiers who had been forced to participate in Japan's war of
aggression sought to receive compensation on the same terms as provided by law to Japanesesoldiers and civilian employees of military, the Tokyo High Court dismissed the case, but at thesame time, in pronouncing the judgment, urged the government to "promptly enact legislation."
This statement served as an impetus for subsequent legislation, and we should recall that in theend, this resulted in the payment of compensation, however inadequate, to the former Taiwanesesoldiers.
According to Okudaira Yasuhiro, Professor Emeritus of the University of Tokyo and an authority
on Japanese constitutional law, the essence of judgments on unconstitutionality seems to lie in
the reasoning rather than the text of the judgment. He spoke highly of the Osaka High Court's
judgment as follows: "The question of whether Yasukuni Shrine visits violate the separation ofstate and religion under the Constitution is a separate issue from the question of who can contest
constitutionality and with what qualifications. It is absurd that no one can contest the illegal
actions of the state unless there has been an infringement of legal interest" (Tokyo Shimbun, May
10, 2005).
On this point, the Fukuoka District Court's ruling of April 7, 2005 (Kamekawa Kiyonaga,presiding judge), which found the Yasukuni Shrine visits unconstitutional, has this to say:
"Despite deeming the visits unconstitutional, the court dismissed compensation claims in theabsence of illegal acts. Opinion may differ about the court's pronouncing on the constitutionalityof the visits. Nevertheless, under present law, even if the visits are in violation of Article 20,
paragraph 3 of the Constitution [12], there is no provision for bringing a lawsuit seeking
judgment just on the constitutionality of the action, or for seeking redress through an
administrative suit. Accordingly, suing for compensation for damages was the only means
available to the plaintiffs to have the unconstitutionality of the visits acknowledged."
The judgment goes on to observe that "The Yasukuni visit in question was carried out without
full debate as to its constitutionality, and the visits have continued since. In view of this situation,
if the courts continue to avoid ruling on their constitutionality, it is highly likely that such actions
will be repeated. This Court has accordingly decided to take as its responsibility a considerationof the constitutionality of the shrine visits and has decided as indicated above.""If the courts continue to avoid ruling on their constitutionality, it is highly likely that suchactions will be repeated": isn't this precisely what is happening in the controversy surrounding
the constitutionality of troop deployment to Iraq?

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace61

Why is it, in the case of Self-Defense Force suits, that is to say, Article 9 lawsuits, that the courts
not only avoid making constitutional judgment, but also avoid the finding- of-fact stage thatshould constitute the basis for making a judgment?
The result is the current situation, in which the government's repeated explanation that the
principal mission of the SDF is defensive, that it does not recognize the right to exercise
collective self-defense, is worth as much as a scrap of paper; in which Prime Minister Koizumi
continues his Yasukuni Shrine visits despite court rulings that they are unconstitutional; in which
the mandatory observation of the Rising Sun flag and singing of the Kimigayo, in violation of theguarantee of freedom of thought and conscience under Article 19 of the Constitution, havetransformed the schools into sites of extraterritoriality where the Constitution does not apply. Inview of these circumstances, it is impermissible for the courts to avoid making a judgment.
In the prevailing circumstances, in order to restore the authority of the law and constitutionalism,
the courts must have the courage to abide by the letter of Article 76, paragraph 3 of theConstitution, which stipulates that "All judges shall be independent in the exercise of theirconscience and shall be bound only by this Constitution and the laws."
Necessity of delivering judgment on the Constitution
When the Osaka High Court ruled that Prime Minister Koizumi's Yasukuni Shrine visits wereunconstitutional and the Tokyo High Court, followed by the Takamatsu High Court, refrained
from ruling on the constitutionality of the visits, many Japanese people came to question the factthat different rulings had been delivered on the same case. In the end, these differences can be
attributed to differing views about the role of the courts, and the Asahi Shimbun carriedcomments by Professor Kinoshita Satoshi, who backed the ruling of the Osaka High Court, andby Judge Inoue Kaoru, who maintained that a ruling on constitutionality was unnecessary(Defendant Exhibit No. 111).According to Professor Kinoshita, "The Constitution gives thecourts the power to determine the constitutionality of any law, order, regulation or official act
and this power includes the role of supporting the rights of individuals as well as the regulativerole of ensuring that governmental bodies do not engage in acts that are in violation of theConstitution .... In the judgment of the Takamatsu High Court, the stance adopted by the court,
which used absence of damages to legally protected interests as justification for avoiding adecision on the official nature and constitutionality of Yasukuni Shrine visits, can be described
as a refusal to see that the suit was seeking "regulation of acts by governmental authority that
violate the Constitution." This [Professor Kinoshita's—Tr.] view is consistent with the following
passage in the "The Story of the New Constitution" (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 1).
"One extremely unusual aspect of this Constitution is that it empowers courts to examine
whether laws created by the Diet are in accord with the Constitution. If a law is found to departfrom what has been decided in the Constitution, it is possible not to obey that law. In this sense,
the courts have been given a very heavy responsibility.
"We the people think of the Diet as acting on our behalf and place our trust in it. In the sameway, we should think of the courts as our allies who protect our rights and freedoms and should
give them our respect."Women and Japan’s Political Economy

62

The Plaintiffs ardently wish to respect the courts as their allies who protect their rights andfreedoms. This, however, becomes impossible when we read the decision to refrain from judging
the constitutionality of the Yasukuni Shrine visits and the decision of the Kofu District Court
submitted in Defendant Exhibit No. 7.At the present time, when many Japanese people have lost
respect for the courts, we hope that the courts will reconsider their role as a way of recovering
the trust of the people.
The article above reported that Judge Inoue Kaoru, who maintained that a court decision on
constitutionality was unnecessary, had often been criticized for his decisions, which were toobrief and unpersuasive to the parties involved. Facing a problematic reappointment on the tenthyear of his term, he himself declined to be reappointed to the bench.
Representative democracy and right to determine constitutionality
The decision by the Kofu District Court cited earlier states that while it was not difficult tounderstand the strong sentiments of the Plaintiffs against troop deployment to Iraq, the situation
was unavoidable under the system of representative democracy in which decisions are based on
the principle of majority rule, and that the only choices were for the Plaintiffs to seek change
through criticism of government policies or, failing that, to accept the situation.
Certainly, if parliamentary representatives were elected on the basis of their views on criticalissues, if laws were enacted after due deliberation according to constitutional law, and if thegovernment were to implement them legitimately, it would be inappropriate to rashly exercise
the power of judicial review.
Unfortunately, however, the system of representative democracy in Japan is in effect moribund.
Elections are not the occasion for debate on critical issues. The general election in September
2005 was fundamentally a single-issue election that centered on the privatization of the postal
system, and as the victory of the Liberal Democratic headed by Prime Minister Koizumi
indicates, the election did not address the dispatch of troops to Iraq, tax hikes, social welfare
measures, or other significant government policies. Representatives were elected without adebate on the Special Measures Law for Iraq, which constitutes the basis for dispatching thetroops in this case, and this legislation was simply rammed through the Diet by sheer force of
numbers. Moreover, the Cabinet has repeatedly violated even this special legislation for Iraq. In
such a situation, we can only say that the system of representative democracy is effectively
moribund.
This is precisely the reason that the right of the courts to determine the extent to which any law,order, regulation or official act is consistent with the Constitution is necessary.
The separation of powers was originally established so that an independent judiciary would serve
as a check on the actions of the legislature and the administration. There can be no democracy,
however, when the people are told that they should forbear and abide by the decisions of thelegislative and administrative branches however much they may violate the Constitution.
5.Duty to uphold constitutionalismYamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace63

In 1972, when Mainichi Shimbun journalist Takichi Nishiyama was convicted of complicity inviolating the National Public Service Law by revealing a secret telegram between the U.S. andJapan regarding the reversion of Okinawa, the head of his defense counsel, Date Akio, who, as
the presiding judge in the Sunakawa Incident had ruled that U.S. bases were in violation of theConstitution, concluded his defense with the following statement. A judge can do nothing otherthan faithfully follow the Constitution and follow the law.
To be sure, it is not the duty solely of the courts to realize constitutionalism and the rule of law,
but rather a duty to be shared by all the people. Article 12 of the Constitution states, "The
freedoms and rights guaranteed to the people by this Constitution must be maintained by theconstant endeavor of the people," and thus assigns to the people the duty to struggle for suchrights. The suit brought by the Plaintiffs regarding the dispatch of troops to Iraq is nothing otherthan the exercise of this "duty to struggle for such rights." We only hope that the court will
deliver a judgment that will serve as a step, however small, toward restoring the rule of law andensuring the sovereignty of the Constitution in Japan.
6.Troop deployment in Iraq—unambiguous constitutional violation
The Preamble of the Constitution declares,"[R]esolved ... never again ... [to] be visited with thehorrors of war through the action of government, [we] do proclaim that sovereign power resides
with the people and do firmly establish this Constitution." It also sets forth that "We, theJapanese people, desire peace for all time and are deeply conscious of the high ideals controllinghuman relationship, and we have determined to preserve our security and existence, trusting in
the justice and faith of the peace-loving peoples of the world….We recognize that all peoples of
the world have the right to live in peace, free from fear and want."
Furthermore, Article 9, paragraph 1 states, "Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based onjustice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation andthe threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes," and paragraph 2 states, "Inorder to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other
war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not berecognized."
The session of the Diet in which the Constitution was enacted confirmed that war for the purposeof self-defense was also renounced (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 3).Thereafter, with the outbreak of the
Korean War, a National Police Reserve was created on the orders of the Supreme Allied
Commander Douglas MacArthur, and the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) were inaugurated in
1954.During the interim, the government repeatedly offered shifting explanations and finallytried to put the matter to rest by stipulating in Article 3 of the Self-Defense Forces Law that "TheJapanese Self-Defense Forces are charged with the primary duty of defending the nation fromdirect or indirect threat in order to preserve national security and safeguard the peace andindependence of the nation, and when necessary, will undertake the maintenance of publicorder."

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

64

On the occasion of the vote on the Self-Defense Forces Law, a resolution barring the overseas
deployment of the SDF was passed in a plenary session of the Diet's upper house on June 2,
1954.
In the Plaintiffs' view, the very existence of the SDF itself is a violation of the Constitution, buteven if we were to accept its existence for the purpose of national defense, the dispatching oftroops to Iraq is clearly a violation not only of the Constitution, but also of the Self-Defense
Forces Law.
Now, a heavily armed Ground Self-Defense Force can be sent overseas to areas of conflict and,
under certain circumstances, exercise the use of force. Moreover, the SDF has been dispatchedand stationed at the behest of the United States which, in violation of international law (Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 89, International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq Judgment) and without justification,
continues to engage in armed attack and occupation of Iraq. [13]This is a blatant and egregious
violation of the Preamble of the Constitution and Article 9, and the courts cannot possibly denythis. No doubt, a number of judges know in their hearts that this is a violation of the Constitution.
This must be the reason that they avoid ruling on the Constitution and dismiss lawsuits brought
to court for lack of standing.
As noted above, however, when the courts avoid making decisions on the Constitution, theviolations of the Constitution by the Diet and administration are accepted de facto, and Japanmoves one step closer to war.
The unconstitutionality and illegality of dispatching the SDF are detailed in Preliminary Brief(3).
Dispatching of SDF to Iraq also violates the Special Measures Law for Iraq
As detailed in Preliminary Brief (3), not only does the Special Measures Law for Iraq itself
violate the Constitution, but the current dispatching of the SDF to Iraq in fact violates the Special
Measure Law for Iraq. What is most evident is its violation of Article 2 of said law. Article 2 ofthis law stipulates that "[Activities for humanitarian and reconstruction assistance] to be
conducted by the SDF shall be implemented in areas where combat is not taking place and is notexpected to take place throughout the period during which the activities are to be conducted
there."[14]The city of Samawa, where the SDF is deployed, however, is an area of combat. Dutch troops,
having suffered both deaths and injuries, have already withdrawn, and attacks continue against
the British troops who have replaced them. On a number of occasions, mortar shells and rockets
have targeted the SDF camp, and on June 23, 2005, a shell landed and exploded near a GroundSDF convoy (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 49, 1, 2; Exhibit No. 50, 2).It is a complete fabrication to saythat Samawa is not an area of combat. For Prime Minister Koizumi to say that the SDF is not
deployed in an area of combat is pure sophistry, but this is the view that has been pushed throughthe Diet.How can we say that the Japanese nation is founded on constitutional principles?
State of affairs in Iraq and SDF activities

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

65

The Plaintiffs refer to the state of affairs in Iraq in Preliminary Brief (1)-1, (1)-2 and havesubmitted abundant documentary evidence. The photographs in Plaintiff Exhibit No. 13 and No.
14 are particularly instructive. Take note, also, of the documentary evidence (Plaintiff Exhibit
No. 81 and No. 85) regarding the damage caused by depleted uranium ammunition, used by the
U.S. military, with a half-life of 4.5 billion years. Make sure to read all of Little Birds (Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 76) as well. This will require much time and mental fortitude, but it is indispensable
for making a judgment in this case
The SDF is now assisting in an unprecedentedly brutal invasion by the U.S. and British military.
Up to now, the Ground SDF has avoided assisting the U.S. and British military in the use of
direct force, but at the urgent request of the U.S. military, it is providing "psychological" support,
while carrying out none of the "activities for humanitarian and reconstruction assistance" whichconstituted its original mission. Regarding water supply, as indicated in Plaintiff Exhibit No.
105, a French NGO (non-governmental organization) was supplying water for 120,000 people asof May 2004.This amount far exceeds the SDF's target of supplying water for 16,000 people,
which has made it unnecessary for the SDF to continue its water supply efforts. Even in pavingroads or building schools, it is much cheaper and more efficient to use an NGO than the SDF. As
the statements of NGO staff indicate, the government only exploits the term "activities forhumanitarian and reconstruction assistance" for political purposes.
The Air SDF provides transport for the armed U.S. military and its multilateral forces, a fact thatis also acknowledged by the Japanese government. During the one-year period after the Air SDF
began providing transport in February 2004, it transported medical equipment only once, on its
first transport mission. This is evident from the fact that, upon making a request for disclosure to
the Japan Defense Agency, we were told that with the exception of the first transport mission, allsubsequent transport missions were confidential and no details could be disclosed. Clearly, atthis point in time, no "activities for humanitarian and reconstruction assistance" are being
conducted at all. The Maritime SDF has continued to refuel U.S. aircraft carriers, an act whichcannot be construed as "activities for humanitarian and reconstruction assistance," but rather,
constitutes support for the U.S. exercise of force.
9.Withdrawal of Ground SDF and shift to a new orderAs stated above, the activities of the Ground SDF have been phased out, and given that theforces of the Netherlands have withdrawn from Iraq, soon to be followed by British andAustralian troops, the Ground SDF is faced with the concrete reality of its own withdrawal.
Under pressure from the United States, however, Japan is unable to express intent to withdraw,
and a bill is now being prepared to authorize provisional transfer of the SDF to Kuwait (Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 116).
On the other hand, it has become known that upon extending troop deployment in Iraq for one
year, the government also revised a major provision of the Special Measures Law, increasing thenumber of domestic airports in Iraq where the Air Self-Defense Forces could operate fromthirteen to twenty-four (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 112).

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

66

Furthermore, it has come to light that at the beginning of this year, when the United States
formed Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT) on the pretext of improving the public security
and administrative capabilities of regional governments following the withdrawal of the Ground
SDF, it approached the commanders of the Ground SDF about the possibility of having theGround SDF participate in this effort (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 113, No. 115).It requested that Japan
increase the areas where the Air Self-Defense Force can fly C130 transport airplanes to two,
which will include the capital of Baghdad (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 115).This indicates that now, in
addition to the back-up support of Air SDF, the Ground SDF and U.S. troops have united todirectly enforce public security together. Such acts only augment the violation of the JapaneseConstitution, which states that "The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."
In this way, the support given by the SDF to the Iraq war and the occupation of Iraq has
increasingly assumed the nature of military involvement. In such a situation, unless the judiciarydelivers a judgment that clearly establishes the unconstitutionality of dispatching troops to Iraq,
it will not be possible to halt these reckless developments and reverse their direction.
10. Iraq and significance of the Japanese Constitution
While the U.S. military occupation continues, Iraq is said to be trying to establish a new
government through elections, but the conflict between the Sunni and Shiite sects has resulted inmany deaths, and Iraq now appears to be moving toward civil war (Plaintiff Exhibit Nos. 117119).Although the U.S. government claims that it is merely observing, the U.S. military that took
control over Iraq through force is now seeking a military solution.
Since U.S. President Bush declared victory almost three years ago, public security in Iraq has
only deteriorated, and its people live in mortal danger. This is proof that peace is not made by
military force, that force only begets more force, extending the chain of violence. This reinforces
what is stated in the Japanese Constitution—the only way to eliminate war is to renounce war
and never maintain war potential of any sort. In a world ever beset by war, Article 9 of theJapanese Constitution is held in high regard by people everywhere, and has become a precious
legacy that Japan can take pride in. Whether this legacy is to be protected is up to the will of thepeople, but today, as our system of representative democracy becomes increasingly hollow, what
we need now are judgments on unconstitutionality by judges who are bound only by theirconscience, the Constitution and the law.
Section 3 Issue for judgment—sending troops to Iraq is a violation of the Plaintiffs'
interests
1. Standing and right to access to courts and judgment (Article 32, Constitution)
The Defendant State only asserts that Plaintiffs' demands cannot be recognized because they lackstanding. In response, the Plaintiffs have provided specific counter-arguments that are explainedin the Preliminary Brief (5), but the Defendant has made no attempt to reply. For the Court toreject the Plaintiffs' claims without attempting to exercise the right to clarify facts and issues isunjustifiable under Code of Civil Procedure.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace67

As stated below, the Plaintiffs have filed suit claiming infringement of concrete rights, but in thefirst place, depending on how infringement of concrete rights and standing are defined, thepeople risk losing the right of access to the courts guaranteed in Article 32 of the Constitution.
As explained in detail in Plaintiffs' Preliminary Brief (2) and (2)-2, there are no stipulations
regarding standing in the Constitution, but only in Article 3 of the Law of the Courts, a lower
law. Accordingly, the Defendant State argues that in Japan, judicial review takes place as neededin the course of applying laws and statutes to the cases at hand. There is a trend, however, towardmerging this form of judicial review with abstract judicial review, since each is a means ofsafeguarding constitutional order, and jurisprudence increasingly holds that standing should bebroadly construed. If it is narrowly construed, as maintained by the Defendant, it will inevitably
lead to a violation of Article 32 of the Constitution, as will be shown.
As maintained in Plaintiffs' Preliminary Brief (6), even though it would be an exaggeration todeem Article 3 of the Judiciary Law unconstitutional itself, if it were to be used as the solejustification for a narrow interpretation of standing and therefore as a basis for turning down the
Plaintiffs' case, then such application of Article 3 of the Judiciary Law infringes on the right ofaccess to the courts guaranteed in Article 32 of the Constitution and would therefore be a case of
unconstitutional application.
We might here refer to the 2004 revision of the Code of Administrative Procedure, whereby
Article 9, paragraph 2 provides that a plaintiff seeking repeal of a disciplinary action need not be
the party directly subject to the action. This was a move to guarantee to the people theconstitutional "right of access to the courts" as widely as possible. Article 3 of the Judiciary Law
should also be interpreted in this spirit.
2.Right to live in peaceFirst among the rights violated by the dispatch of the SDF to Iraq that the Plaintiffs wish to assert
is the right to live in peace .
In an astounding judgment, the Kofu District Court ruled that this cannot be considered aconcrete right because peace as well as the means of maintaining peace are values that differ
from individual to individual. The Preamble of the Constitution, however, states that "We
recognize that all peoples of the world have the right to live in peace, free from fear and want,"
and as the means of achieving this, Article 9 clearly stipulates, the "Japanese people forever
renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settlinginternational disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, andair forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency ofthe state will not be recognized." The means and method here are unequivocal. Regardless ofattempts to change this interpretation, whether due to pressure from the United States or the
motives of politicians, it is incumbent upon the courts to deliver judgments that are based on theConstitution in all cases.
In a similar suit filed in Shizuoka District Court, constitutional scholar Yamauchi Toshihiro
testified regarding the right to live in peace (Plaintiff Exhibit No. 120, 1, 2).Professor Yamauchi

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

68

based the right to live in peace on the Preamble of the Constitution and put forth a detailed
explanation of the judicial norms presented in the Preamble. We would like to call particularattention to the part in which he shows that given how, in France and Germany, the preambles of
the constitutions are recognized as providing judicial norms, the argument denying judicial
normativity to the Preamble of the Constitution of Japan is unpersuasive from the perspective ofcomparative constitutional law. In fact, in Japan, too, there are cases in which lower courts havefound a direct basis for their decisions in the Preamble.
Furthermore, it is also noteworthy that the Supreme Court has not yet delivered a decision
rejecting the right to live in peace. The Supreme Court decision in the Hyakuri Base Case isunderstood to have rejected this right, but this ruling pertained to government action in a private
capacity and did not involve dismissal of the right to live in peace in the context of the exerciseof public authority. [15]Professor Yamauchi, basing the right to live in peace directly on the Preamble of theConstitution, goes on to testify that the meaning of peace as used here is concretely explained inboth the Preamble and Article 9, and the meaning of the right to live in peace is supplemented byeach of the provisions pertaining to human rights in Article 13 and subsequent articles. As for theconditions in which the right to live in peace can be found to have occurred, he states that "asituation in which the lives and freedoms of the people are violated due to war, the threat of war,or an act of support for war or when there is the threat of such violation." Furthermore, in"situations where, in the event that the government, in violation of the Constitution, carries out aconcrete act of support for war, there is a violation of the right of the people not to become
perpetrators of war or becoming party to an act of support for war, or when there is the threat ofsuch violation."
Legal theories that recognize the right to live in peace cite various grounds to justify this right,
but insofar as Japan's exceptional refusal to accord judicial normativity to the Preamble of its
Constitution is not recognized from the perspective of comparative law, it would seem correct tobase the right to live in peace on the Preamble, which puts forth this right in a clear andunequivocal manner. The various views, however, are not mutually contradictory. Plaintiffs haveasserted that the right to live in peace is clearly based on the Preamble of the Constitution, thatthe concrete meaning of this right is set forth in Article 9, and that it is guaranteed as a concreteright in Article 13 of the Constitution. The Defendant, on the other hand, rejects this claim by
separating the Preamble from Article 13 and considering them to be separate rights. The
Defendant's claim, which makes no mention of Article 9—the crux of the right to live in peace—does not constitute a counterargument to the Plaintiffs' claims. We request that the Court refrainfrom taking the part of such slipshod arguments.
3.Personal rights
Because the Defendant asserts personal rights are not concrete rights, Plaintiffs have provided
Preliminary Brief (6) listing cases that have recognized personal rights in the past. The conceptof personal rights, in addition to those fundamental to personhood— life, body, and health—refers to the totality of interests associated with reputation, name, image, privacy, freedom,
livelihood, etc. Among personal rights, what is at stake in this case is the right of a person neverYamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace69

to be placed in the position of having to rob or be robbed of "life," in other words, a guarantee ofthe right "to be neither a perpetrator nor a victim of war." Because the Plaintiffs have, in thecourse of their lives, placed "respect for life" at the center of their character formation, they feelstrong psychological resistance and emotional shock at finding themselves on the side of those
who rob people from other countries of their lives, not to mention being placed at risk ofendangering their own lives.
4.Interests to be guaranteed by law
According to the Tokyo District Court judgment in the Minesweeper Case (May 10, 1996),"Illegal acts committed by the state for which compensation can be demanded under the National
Compensation Law, Article 1, paragraph1, include not only those that violate established rights,
but also those that violate interests not yet clearly established as rights that should be recognized
as legally protected rights whose infringement would be illegal. When an individual's mental
anguish incurred by injury to feelings exceeds the limits of endurance generally expected bysociety at large, it may be construed that there exists a personal interest that should be legally
protected, and in case of infringement of the same, this infringement can be understood as having
constituted an illegal act, depending on the condition of infringement and the degree.
Furthermore, "in order to assess whether the mental anguish incurred by injury to the feelings ofan individual has exceeded the limits of endurance generally expected by society at large, theindividual must have experienced, as the result of being in a certain, particular position, etc., thesort of serious distress, irritation, etc., that could not have been incurred in the ordinary course ofdaily life in society."
The judgments on peace lawsuits thus far, including the one above, are mistaken with regard toconstitutional rights, and we cannot agree with their conclusions. Nevertheless, in this case,while the dispatch of the SDF to Iraq may be construed as a logical step in a series of
unconstitutional acts leading to the present, the deployment of armed SDF troops to a combat
zone differs in substance in every way from these preceding cases in that the Plaintiffs' right tolive in peace is flagrantly violated and their mental anguish ensuing from it has clearly exceeded
the limit of endurance expected by society.
Further, recall the case in which a widow sued the Japanese government for the enshrinement ofher deceased husband, an SDF officer. Professor Yamauchi argues that the "interest in praying
for the spirit of one's deceased husband without being disturbed by others," as articulated by
Justice Ito Masami in the Supreme Court decision in that case[16], deserves to considered aconstitutionally guaranteed right. Additionally, the Supreme Court decision in the case of
Delayed Certification of Minamata [mercury poisoning] Disease Victims ruled that an "interest
to live peacefully without mental anguish" constituted an interest to be protected against
infringement under the law against illegal acts. [17] From these cases, we can see that there is abroad concept of legally protected interests.
We ask your Honors to carefully examine the photographs submitted as Plaintiff Exhibit No. 13
and 14.Looking at these photographs, do you not feel mental anguish? And do you not feel
distressed to know that the Japanese SDF has been deployed to assist the U.S. in this war?

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

70

Today, school children are forced to honor the Rising Sun flag and sing the Kimigayo anthem. Ifchildren do not perform these acts in the manner deemed appropriate or if teachers do notcooperate, the teachers are disciplined. Those distributing leaflets or writing graffiti saying "antiwar" in public restrooms have been arrested or subject to extended detention and given guilty
verdicts. We cannot help thinking that the [prewar] Peace Preservation Law has been revived.
The Plaintiffs fear that this sort of situation will lead Japan down the path to war. Such fear must
be distinguished from indignation, anger or despair over having one's assertions denied. It is notthat our peace of mind has been disturbed. No, our peace of mind has been destroyed, and we aresubject to unbearable pain night and day. This pain cannot be compared to the unease of having aflier stuffed in one's mailbox (in the Tachikawa Tent Village case, the Tokyo High Court,
determining that citizens derived to be legally protected against unease, found the flyer
distributers guilty).The pain we feel is incomparably more significant and grave. The abovementioned judgment in the minesweeper case requires that "in order to assess whether the mental
anguish incurred by injury to the feelings of an individual has exceeded the limits of forbearance
generally expected by society at large, the individual must have experienced, as the result of
being in a given, particular position, etc., the sort of serious distress, irritation, etc., that could nothave been incurred in the ordinary course of daily life in society."In the terms of that judgment, the Plaintiffs in the present case, having either experienced war orgrown up hearing about the experience of war, who therefore have centered their character
formation on the belief that the Japanese Constitution was uniquely precious in never permitting
the catastrophe of war to be repeated, who now witness the ravages of the Iraq War, theparticipation of the Self-Defense Forces in that war, and the concomitant destruction of theConstitution, assert that they are experiencing unbearable pain. These circumstances are suchthat they could not have been incurred in the ordinary course of daily life in society.
In this case, the Plaintiffs who have experienced war have stated their views. How did theysound to your Honors who do not know war? Might you have heard them as simply referring to
the past, having nothing to do with you? But the Plaintiffs know what war is. In the previous
war, too, preparations were made in secret, and when it started, it was no longer possible to raise
voices in opposition. We hope your Honors who do not know war will learn about how that war
started amid the suppression of free speech, and how the Japanese military committed atrocities
and killed twenty million Asian people, and how the war also killed over three million Japanese,and having learned this, we hope you will apply it to your ruling in this case.
Section 4.What we seek from the court
1.War responsibility of judges
On February 9, 2006, Presiding Judge Matsuo Shoichi of the Yokohama District Court handed
down a judgment that dismissed the petition for retrial of the wartime "Yokohama Incident," inwhich five people were tortured and died, and many others wrongfully convicted. The decision
to dismiss the petition for retrial was based on the fact that the Peace Preservation Law underwhich the victims were arrested and convicted no longer exists, and amnesty had been granted.
This, however, covers up the responsibility of the Special Police officers who conducted thetorture to extract so-called confessions, and the judges who followed the Peace Preservation Law

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace71

and delivered guilty verdicts based on those confessions on September 9, 1945, after Japan had
been defeated. According to Kimura Maki, petitioner for retrial, the question was not one ofdeclaring nonguilty or dismissal, but "solely whether the judicial system can fully recognize pastcrimes and apologize to the victims. "Former Supreme Court justice and leading counsel Kan
Naotsugu stated, "As a former member of the judiciary and a private individual, I find it
unbearable to think that there are still courts delivering such embarrassing rulings" (Plaintiff
Exhibit No. 121)
In the postwar period, the Tokyo War Crimes Trial did make an attempt, albeit inadequate, topursue the question of the war responsibility of the military leaders, and politicians andindustrialists were purged from public office. Within the judiciary, however, hardly any judges
were purged, even though, through their rulings, they were responsible for acts of suppression in
the name of public security. Only 32 public prosecutors who had been involved in ideologicalcrimes were purged. Moreover, many of the purged were later reinstated, and some, like Imoto
Daikichi, even rose to become Public Prosecutor General.
In contrast, in Germany, after leading figures were tried in the Nuremburg War Crimes Trials,
continuing trials were opened to prosecute those responsible in twelve different fields such as the
judiciary, foreign affairs, economy, medicine, etc. The judiciary, in particular, has continued toreflect on Nazi era law, and the legal academy, which is responsible for the training of lawyers,
is said to continue to address the issue of war responsibility on the part of the judiciary. Japan,
however, has failed to pursue the war responsibility of the judiciary, and the curriculum of theLegal Training and Research Institute of Japan does not touch upon the wartime judiciary. The
consequence is decisions such as Judge Matsuo's ruling in the Yokohama Incident retrial case,and other decisions that remind us of conditions under the Peace Preservation Law.
2.The courts as guardians of the law
As for this lawsuit, are your Honors of the opinion that you should reject or dismiss the suit bydelivering a ruling in accordance with previous judgments, and which limits itself to a minimal
interpretation? We ask you to remember, however, that the courts are the guardians of the law. If
constitutional violations are left unaddressed, we can imagine a future in which Japan once again
heads down the path to war, and the Japanese people as well as people of all nations (inparticular, of Asia) will suffer the ravages of war. The courts can reverse this tide by adhering to
the Constitution. The courts can fulfill their role as guardians of the law not only by delivering aruling that finds a violation of the Constitution, but also by demonstrating an understanding of
the distress of the Plaintiffs who feel unbearable pain over the current SDF deployment in Iraq.
The Plaintiffs sincerely hope for a judgment that will reverse the direction of the previous
judgments and bring us back even one step closer to the Constitution.
End
Date of Judgment: May 11, 2006
* Section pertaining to judgment of the court

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

72

Judgment of Tokyo District Court
Section 3Judgment of the Court
1.Regarding the request for injunction
We consider the assertion by the Plaintiffs that their right to live in peace and personal rights
based on the right to live in peace have been violated, and that if this violation is left
unaddressed, there is a high risk of irreparable damage, and for this reason, they have the right toseek an injunction to stop the dispatch of the Self-Defense Forces.
(1) The right to live in peace and personal rights based on the right to live in peace
The second paragraph of the Preamble of the Constitution confirms that "all peoples of the world
have the right to live in peace." The Preamble, however, is first and foremost a statement of theConstitution's principles, foundation, etc., and even though it indicates the guiding principles andcriteria for interpreting the individual articles that make up the body of the Constitution, it is notpossible to interpret it as directly giving rise to legal effects or binding power. As such, despitewhat the second paragraph of the Preamble stipulates, it is not possible to derive from it, as
maintained by the Plaintiffs, the right to live in peace or personal rights based on the right to livein peace.
Moreover, even though Article 9 states that the Japanese people renounce war as a sovereign
right of the nation and the threat or use of force, will not maintain war potential, and do notrecognize the right of belligerency of the state, it is evident from the wording of that Article thatit presents a normative statement about state structure and state actions, and it is not possible toderive from it a right under private law such as the right to live in peace or a legal interest.
Moreover, Article 13 sets forth respect for all people as individuals and the right to the pursuit ofhappiness, and the provisions under Chapter 3 of the Constitution set forth the rights and dutiesof the people, and there is no wording referring to the right to live in peace, the right asserted by
the Plaintiffs. As such, it is not possible to derive from these articles the right to live in peace as aconcrete right such as asserted by the Plaintiffs or as a legal interest.
In addition, no legal ordinances exist regarding the right to live in peace as a concrete right suchas asserted by the Plaintiffs or as a legal interest. In view of the above as well as the Constitution
and various laws and ordinances, it is not possible to recognize the right to live in peace as aconcrete right such as asserted by the Plaintiffs or as a legal interest. Furthermore, based on thePreamble of the Constitution, Article 9 and Article 13, it is not possible to recognize theexistence of personal rights such as stated by the Plaintiff.
2) Consequently, it is clear that the right to live in peace as a concrete right such as asserted by
the Plaintiffs or as a legal interest is not a concrete right guaranteed by the Constitution or legal
interest, and there is generally no basis for a request for injunction, and therefore, it is notnecessary to consider the remaining points, and the request for injunction itself is subject todismissal by the court as illegitimate.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace73

2.Regarding compensation for damages
The Plaintiffs assert that that their right to live in peace and their personal rights based on theright to live in peace have been violated.
Nevertheless, as explained above, the right to live in peace as asserted by the Plaintiffs and thepersonal rights based on the right to live in peace cannot be recognized as a concrete right orlegal interest guaranteed by the Constitution.
As such, the Plaintiffs' petition for compensation lacks an interest that has been infringed, andtherefore there is no reason to consider the remaining points.
3. Conclusion
The court delivers a judgment as follows: In this case brought by the Plaintiffs, the court
dismisses the lawsuit seeking an injunction on the grounds of its illegitimacy and rejects theremaining request (request seeking compensation for damages) for lack of reason to meritconsideration.
Tokyo District Court 15th Civil Division
Presiding Judge Udagawa Motoi,
Judge Nakasato Atsushi
Judge Yasumi Akira
Regarding the Judgment
Lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of SDF deployment in Iraq have been filed byapproximately 5,600 plaintiffs in eleven courts in Japan, making this collectively the largest
peace lawsuit in Japan's postwar history. While many of these lawsuits are still continuing, theJapanese government announced on June 20 that it would withdraw the Ground SDF now
deployed in Samawa. Our lawsuit has been a part of this series of events. We feel that we haveplayed a certain role in this withdrawal, not only through our lawsuit, but together with citizens'movements against the deployment of troops in Iraq.
Nevertheless, the government is now considering expanding the Air SDF's airlift operations thattransport troops of the multinational forces and supplies to twenty-four airports in Kuwait and
Iraq. If this is realized, the Air SDF will be providing direct support for the military operations of
the U.S. forces, constituting what will be an even more evident violation of Article 9.We demand
the withdrawal of all SDF forces including the Air SDF and will continue to take action invarious ways to achieve this.
Many decisions have been handed down in the lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of SDF
deployment in Iraq, all deciding against the plaintiff. The fifteen-woman lawsuit opposing theWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

74

SDF in Iraq was no exception. Based on the series of events up to now, this did not take us by
surprise, but we hoped to extend and develop the reasons given in the judgment, thereby pushinglegal theory to a deeper level as well as appealing to the conscience and emotions of the judges.
But, as we presented argument after argument, the three judges closed their hearts, turned awayfrom our legal assertions and summarily dismissed our lawsuit with reasons amounting to a mere
two pages.
We will never forget the names of the three judges who delivered this judgment. We believe that
history will one day judge those judges, including the three presiding in our lawsuit, who havedismissed the lawsuits contesting the constitutionality of SDF deployment in Iraq.
Nakajima MichikoJune 23, 2006
Translated by Kathryn Tanaka, Nick Albertson, and Sarah Allen with permission of Nakajima
Michiko. Editorial assistance from Scott Mehl. Kathryn Tanaka and Nick Albertson study
Japanese literature, Sarah Allen, Japanese art history, and Scott Allen, comparative literature,
all at the University of Chicago.
[1] The "text of the judgment" here refers to "shubun," and the contrasting "reasoning" to "riyu";
these might have been translated as "holding" and "obiter dicta" or "ratio decidendi," but given
the amount of discussion, particularly on the latter two terms in the English-language literature, it
has seemed wiser not to be overly ambitious in aiming for precision in translating terms of art.
[2] For a Korean report on the 2004 verdict, see here.
For a discussion of the constitutionality of Koizumi's visits, see here.
[3] The Sunagawa Incident refers to large-scale protests in of plans to enlarge the U.S. base at
Tachikawa, west of Tokyo, in 1957.The Tokyo District Court, as part of its March 1959 decision,
declared the presence of U.S. bases in Japan to be in violation of Article 9 (see below [4]), afinding reversed by the Supreme Court in December of that same year.
[4] "1) Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanesepeople forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force asmeans of settling international disputes. 2) In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding
paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The
right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized." [from the official translation; the entire
text may be found here.
[5] "Excepting those instances where the Constitution has made specific provision, the courts are
vested with the authority to judge all legal disputes and to make determinations with respect toall other laws." [Judiciary Law, Article 3, paragraph 1][6] "No person shall be denied the right of access to the courts." [Article 32]

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace75[7] "We, the Japanese people, acting through our duly elected representatives in the National theDiet, determined that we shall secure for ourselves and our posterity the fruits of peacefulcooperation with all nations and the blessings of liberty throughout this land, and resolved thatnever again shall we be visited with the horrors of war through the action of government, do
proclaim that sovereign power resides with the people and do firmly establish this Constitution.
Government is a sacred trust of the people, the authority for which is derived from the people,
the powers of which are exercised by the representatives of the people, and the benefits of which
are enjoyed by the people. This is a universal principle of mankind upon which this Constitution
is founded. We reject and revoke all constitutions, laws, ordinances, and rescripts in conflictherewith. We, the Japanese people, desire peace for all time and are deeply conscious of the highideals controlling human relationship and we have determined to preserve our security andexistence, trusting in the justice and faith of the peace-loving peoples of the world. We desire tooccupy an honored place in an international society striving for the preservation of peace, and thebanishment of tyranny and slavery, oppression and intolerance for all time from the earth. We
recognize that all peoples of the world have the right to live in peace, free from fear and want.
We believe that no nation is responsible to itself alone, but that laws of political morality are
universal; and that obedience to such laws is incumbent upon all nations who would sustain theirown sovereignty and justify their sovereign relationship with other nations. We, the Japanesepeople, pledge our national honor to accomplish these high ideals and purposes with all ourresources." [from the official translation][8] "All of the people shall be respected as individuals. Their right to life, liberty, and the pursuitof happiness shall, to the extent that it does not interfere with the public welfare, be the supremeconsideration in legislation and in other governmental affairs." [Article 13][9] On February 27, 2005, Obora Toshiyuki, Onishi Nobuhiro and Takada Sachimi (all men in
their late 40s) were taken into police custody for distributing pamplets in the SDF dormitories,
asking SDF members to think more deeply about their involvement and support for an illegal andexpensive war.The men were held for seventy-five days before being charged with criminal
trespass and released on bail.Prosecutors asked the Hachioji branch of the Tokyo District Court
to give the men a six-month prison sentence, but the case was thrown out of court.The
prosecutors appealed to the Tokyo High Court, where on 9 December 2005, the three men wereconvicted of criminal trespass for the danger they posed to the SDF.The men are currently
appealing this conviction and the ¥100,000 fine levied against them (although this was reduced
from ¥200,000). For further information in English, see here and here.
[10] The Yokohama Incident is a term used in the postwar period to describe the arrests of morethan fifty journalists and lower-ranking government officials, beginning in Yokohama on 14
December 1942 and continuing into 1945.Trumped-up charges implicated the accused ofCommunist activities.The incident is seen as a prime example of the deployment of the Peace
Preservation Law for the wartime suppression of ideas deemed dangerous by the government aswell as brutal interrogation techniques that led to the death of four men in custody and two others
shortly after release on bail.
The arrests had especially serious consequences for two of the most influential liberal journals of
the prewar era, Kaizo and Chuo Koron.Senior staff at both magazines were forced to leave afterWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

76

publishing articles the government deemed Communist in 1942, and both magazines ceased
publication in 1944 under this pressure.They were restarted in 1946.
The victims of these arrests and their families have engaged in a lengthy court battle with theJapanese state, asking for an apology and restitution of their good name.The Tokyo High Court
recently dismissed appeals brought by family members of five of the men (all now deceased)
who sought to clear their names. For more information in English, see here and here.
[11] The article describes how Japan contracted out the water-supplying mission to a FrenchNGO, which then had the actual work done by Iraqi workers.The project as executed by the
NGO is said to be far more effective, both in cost and numbers served, than what the SDF itself
was targeted (and budgeted) to achieve. According to sources cited in the article, this is true forwater purification, the construction and reconstruction of schools and roads as well.Since
Japanese taxpayer money would have been far better served supporting NGOs,"humanitarian
support activities" in fact obscures the political purpose for SDF presence.
[12] "The State and its organs shall refrain from religious education or any other religious
activity." [from the official translation][13] Japanese citizens organized an International Criminal Tribunal for Iraq (ICTI; Iraku kokusaiminshu hotei) to run in conjunction with the World Tribunal on Iraq (WTI), an international
people's tribunal modeled on the Bertrand Russell World Peace Foundation tribunal of the late1960s on crimes committed in Vietnam.The Russell Tribunal was also the model for the
Women's Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery in 2000, and those involved in the latter
contributed the lessons learned from that experience to the WTI.The ICTI, like the Women's
Tribunal, had an international panel of judges; defendants were George W. Bush, Tony Blair,
Koizumi Jun'ichiro, and Gloria Arroyo (President of the Philippines).Information may be foundhere.The WTI held hearings "on crimes against humanity and against the planet" in twenty sitesaround the world, beginning in 2003, and delivered its judgment in a final session in Istanbul that
was attended by representatives from over 100 countries in 2005. For an observer's report here.
Arundhati Roy delivered the opening keynote, "On Behalf of the Jury of Conscience of theWorld" on 24 June 2005, to be found here.A number of sources refer to a WTI website here that
could not,however, be accessed as of8 October 2007. The findings of the Jury of Conscience
may be read here.
[14] From a provisional translation of the Special Measures Law for Iraq by the Ministry ofForeign Affairs available here. The term "combat" is marked with an asterisk in the original, butthere are no footnotes.
[15] The Hyakuri Base suit concerned the efforts of citizens to prevent state purchase of land forthe purpose of air base construction. The Supreme Court in its 1989 decision confirmed lower
court rulings that the state was acting in a capacity equivalent to that of a private citizen and thatthe case therefore did not involve the Constitution. For insight into the continued Japanesedistinction between "private law" and "public law" as applied to this case, see here; a good brief
discussion of the case in Japanese may be found here.

Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace77[16] For a contemporary report in English see here; unfortunately, an English translation of theSupreme Court ruling that was available on this website but a few months ago has disappeared.
[17] For an update on Minamata contextualizing the Supreme Court ruling see here.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

78“Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?”Charles Weathers
October 3, 2005
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Charles-Weathers/2012
In addition to political participation, women’s groups in Japan continue to advocate
for equality in employment opportunities and to challenge gendered labor structures.
Charles Weathers discusses the question of whether Japan has truly progressed towards
equal career opportunities for women after twenty years of legislative interventions (19852005). Weathers provides a concise overview of some of the lingering obstacles thatwomen confront in Japan’s workforce. First, he highlights the reality that companies inJapan find ways of evading gender equality in hiring and promotion structures. The socalled “dual-track” personnel system allowed corporations to hire managers (men) versus
clerical workers (women). Even after the equality laws established in 1985 and 1999,
firms could still divide workers into “regular” versus “non-regular” categories. Female
employees often fall into the category of “non-regular” workers, which include “part-timers”
who may work full hours or temporary employees with limited contracts. Non-regular
workers lack job security, an issue particularly discriminatory when some firms continue
to offer “regular” male employees lifetime employment.5
Regarding promotion patterns, Weathers cites a survey from the Japan Institute ofWorker’s Evolution that shows many firms “rarely promoted women.” Despite recent
examples such as Sanyo Electric Co. hiring a female CEO Tomoyo Nonaka (1954-) in 2005,
women in Japan still face a “glass ceiling” effect; they can only climb so high on thecorporate ladder. Married women also face tax disincentives if they earn more than alimited amount in a dual income family. Working parents in general may be penalized or
disadvantaged in terms of equal advancement when corporations require regular
employees to accept transfers and “on-call” availability.
In terms of advocacy for women’s worker rights, the author demonstrates thatcurrent support systems rarely challenge the company-centered status quo of genderedlabor practices in Japan. Weathers explains that many Equal Opportunity offices remain“reluctant to support women actively challenging employer discrimination.” Government
employees and bureaucrats handling labor issues, reflecting neoliberal privileging ofcorporations over citizens, tend to side with businesses in maintaining discriminatory
practices. Similarly, labor unions may be limited in how much they serve the needs ofwomen and non-regular workers. However, the largest national trade union organizationin Japan, RENGO (Japanese Trade Union Confederation), clearly states in their 2010-2011
Action Policies that they will achieve “an increase in the number of female executives,
which is the biggest issue of promoting equal participation of women and men in tradeunions.”6 It is noteworthy, however, that the Action Policy does not address the issue of
sexual harassment as central to labor unions and their involvement in equal opportunity.
5

According to Hiroshi Ono, while journalistic coverage suggests that Japan’s system of lifetime employment is all
but dead, he argues that the practice indeed still continues at least through 2005.
6
RENGO Action Policy 5 2010-2011,
http://www.jtucrengo.org/12th_biennial_convention/data/action_policies2010-2011.pdf

Weathers: Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?

79

Sexual harassment in the workplace remains one of the key complaints brought to Equal
Opportunity offices, but labor unions rarely focus on this issue.
Weathers concludes his article with a discussion of whether contemporary Japanesewomen choose to work or to marry, given the difficulty of doing both. He suggests that thefirst generation of women after the 1985 EEOL tended to embrace a worker identity to
pursue careers intensely, even to the detriment of their personal lives. However, Japan
may be witnessing a reversal of this trend. Women may opt for the perceived financial
security of marriage, despite a rise in divorce rates and pressures of a shrinking Japanese
economy. Overall, Weathers offers an important summary of the main issues that continue
to challenge working women in Japan. This article serves as a reference point for
examining the effects of later interventions such as the 2010 “Action Policy for Promoting
Work-Life Balance,” which targets the employment rate of women as central to achieving asociety based on “economic independence.”

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

80

Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?
By Charles Weathers
Career opportunities have improved greatly for many Japanese women in recent years. Morelarge companies are willing to hire them as career-track employees, and their share of elite civil
servant positions has been growing. Although female students at my institution, Osaka City
University, still encounter discrimination during the job hunt, they have actually outperformed
men in recent job searches. A survey of the top 74 universities confirms the trend, showing thatwomen had higher job placement rates this spring in most of the 395 departments covered. [1] It
appears that some businesses are taking more seriously the mantra that ability trumps gender intoday’s more globalized, market-oriented economy.
Despite these signs of progress, however, employment opportunity for the majority of women
may actually be getting worse. The main reason is that employers are intent on reducing costs byreplacing regular (seiki) employees with lower-paid, disposable non-regular (hiseiki) workers,
including part-timers, agency temporaries, and contract workers, who often do the same orsimilar work. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) estimates that non-regular
workers constituted 34.6 percent of the salaried work force in 2003, and the figure continues torise. The Japanese have assigned the name hiseikika (non-regularization) to the rising ratio of
non-regular workers. Some, particularly housewives caring for young children, are content with
non-regular and part-time jobs, but the number of “involuntary” non-regulars, those unable tofind regular positions, has grown steadily in recent years. Further, even regular female
employees are bothered by sexual harassment, discrimination in promotions to management, andrefusal of childcare leave.
Twenty years after the passage of the first Equal Employment Opportunity Law, why does
Japan’s progress toward equal opportunity remain so erratic, or worse? What are the prospects ofimprovement as MHLW officials urge business to accept a revision of the country’s weak equal
opportunity law, hopefully by next year? Below, I outline some of the major issues and problems
facing Japan’s equal opportunity reformers.
Equal opportunity laws, new and old
In the mid-1970s, just as the United Nations began to actively promote gender equality, Japaneseemployers were expanding use of women as non-regular employees in order to reduce risinglabor costs in a tight labor market. As a result, the ratio of part-timers in the work force increased
from 3 percent in 1975 to 12 percent in1992. The original Equal Employment Opportunity Law(1985) was passed largely to placate international opinion. It did not prohibit discrimination in
hiring or promotion. Many large firms evaded the law by establishing so-called dual-track
personnel systems, which included separate management-track (sogo-shoku) and clerical-track(ippan-shoku) courses. Their main function was legal cover for continuing to assign jobs on thebasis of gender. Even in 2000-01, according to a government survey, only 2.2 percent of
employees in large companies’ career tracks were women.
By the early 1990s, there was growing pressure – economic as well as social – to strengthen theclearly ineffective EEOL. The government had hoped that the original EEOL would put an end

Weathers: Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?

81

to discrimination lawsuits; instead the proliferation of dual-track systems triggered a “secondboom” in discrimination lawsuits. Overt discrimination was clearly out of touch with changing
social values, and business leaders, increasingly concerned about global competition, recognizedthat the law was not promoting the utilization of women’s talents. But most importantly, around1990 an unexpectedly sharp decline in the birthrate, leading to projected labor shortages, jolted
national leaders into taking action. Alarmed that a declining population would undermine theeconomy, they feared that poor childcare support and bad working conditions for full-time
employees (especially notoriously long hours) were both discouraging couples from having
children, and leading women to forego careers or quit professional jobs.
Labor ministry bureaucrats took advantage of this situation to press a campaign to revise the
EEOL. The Revised EEOL, which took effect in 1999, is also weak, but it makes discriminationin hiring and promotion illegal. It also provides better support for women challenging
discriminatory practices in court, although it prescribes no penalties. The Revised EEOL wassuccessfully utilized by anti-discrimination plaintiffs for the first time in a lawsuit against
Nomura Securities. In a verdict handed down in February 2002 after nine years of litigation, thecourt acknowledged that discrimination had occurred for many years, since the women wereclearly paid less than men for doing similarly skilled work. The company promoted the threeplaintiffs who were still working, and paid lump-sum settlements to all 13 plaintiffs. However,the court ruled that the practices were illegal only from April 1, 1999, when the Revised EEOL
took effect, limiting the size of the damages. Although the case was a landmark, its implications
remain uncertain. Nomura was perhaps careless in openly using low-paid female employees toperform skilled work; other firms can take precautions such as redefining jobs, or using nonregular workers, whose rights are ill defined. Further, Japan’s conservative courts place
relatively little weight on precedent, so the Nomura case’s impact will not be clear until morecases have been settled, and a broader legal pattern established.
Obstacles to equal opportunity
Despite the widely recognized economic importance of working women, Japan’s would-be
reformers have achieved only incremental advances in protection of women’s job rights. Whenseeking to establish new laws (or revise existing laws), labor-welfare ministry officials first
convene policy deliberation councils (shingikai) consisting of representatives of labor, business,and the “public interest” (mostly lawyers, academics, and journalists) who debate drafts of bills
before sending them to the Diet. To gain business consent to significant new proposals, it
generally must be clear that they are necessary to respond to changes in public opinion or ininternational standards, or that they have economic merit; the anti-discrimination clauses in therevised EEOL basically met all these conditions. More far-reaching proposals have not.
The current discussion on revision centers on five issues: prohibiting denial of childcare leaverights, prohibiting indirect discrimination, strengthening anti-sexual harassment measures,strengthening the application of positive action (the counterpart to the US’s affirmative action),and shifting the law’s basis to gender neutrality (prohibiting discrimination against men as well
as women in order to achieve greater equality). The first (leave rights) and third (sexual
harassment) are fundamentally about getting serious about enforcing the law. But indirectdiscrimination – practices that are nominally gender-neutral but in reality disproportionately

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

82

disadvantageous to women – is notoriously difficult to clearly define and identify. The
channeling of women into non-regular jobs is generally regarded as indirect discrimination (inmany countries), especially when wage and benefit differentials regular and non-regular work
are large, as in Japan. Thus indirect discrimination is closely linked to non-regularization, and isaccordingly the present shingikai’s central issue. Employers and unions did agree at the June
meeting that height and weight requirements for employees would constitute indirectdiscrimination, but in other cases, such as different compensation for regular and non-regular
workers, clear standards have been nearly impossible to produce.
Meanwhile, relations between ministry officials and equal opportunity activists and litigantsremain strained. To date, local Equal Opportunity offices have been notoriously reluctant tosupport women actively challenging employer discrimination. Labor bureaucrats actively joined
business in the late 1990s in supporting the liberalization of agency temporary work.
Progressive observers regarded that as detrimental to the interests of workers, especially women,
who then accounted for nearly ninety percent of temps. Proponents argue that liberalization has
expanded job possibilities, while critics point to falling wages and lack of benefits. The average
wage for temps dropped from around 1704 yen per hour in 1994 to around 1430 yen by 2004 as
the number of temporary workers increased sharply, according to Haken Rodo Network, an NPO
that supports temps’ rights.
Non-regular workers
While the numbers of non-regular workers have grown in most industrialized countries, theincrease has been especially rapid in Japan, tripling since 1980, and increasing 1.5 times in thepast decade. From 1997 to 2002, about three million regular jobs were lost, while a slightly
larger number of non-regular jobs was created.
Employers have long maintained that lower pay and benefits for part-timers are justified because
they have fewer skills and less responsibility than regular workers (they earlier made the same
points about female workers in general). That stance was always shaky, partly because many
women were denied the chances to raise skills, and it is increasingly wide of the mark. Not only
do many “part-timers” work full-time hours (they are sometimes called “false part-timers”), but
part-timers’ skill levels have increased considerably since the mid-1980s, while employers
continue to hold down their compensation. The term part-timer (paato) is as much about status(low) as about work hours (variable).
The incentive for hiring non-regulars is not just lower pay and fewer benefits. Often even more
important is that they are far easier to dismiss than regular workers, whose job security has beenprotected by the courts. In principle, non-regulars have the same job security rights as regular
employees, but the courts have been reluctant to give them the same backing. Many companies
use carefully crafted contracts that spell out work periods to prevent part-timers from claiming
renewal rights. Instead of directly firing workers, companies simply do not renew their contracts(yatoi-dome). In addition, businesses often get away with illegal dismissals because many
employees do not know their rights. Reformers are seeking to legally require managers to
explain rights to workers when they sign contracts, as well as to challenge the free use of yatoi-

Weathers: Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?

83

dome. Critics charge that firms often use contract non-renewal to rid themselves of employees
who join unions, become pregnant, or press sexual harassment complaints (Asahi Shinbun, 23
May 2005).
In the meantime, employers are developing new personnel practices to maximize the use of
inexpensive non-regular labor. [2] Paato in many firms have been subdivided into “core” and“supplementary” employees. Some companies have created such categories as “regular workertype paato” and “paato-type regular worker” (the terms are equally clunky in Japanese). The new
employee categories are often based on willingness to accept transfers involving relocation, andwillingness to work irregular hours. The higher-ranking categories have better pay andpromotion prospects. Supermarkets are in the forefront of the changes since most of theiremployees are now part-timers. Many of their paato perform low-level managerial functions,such as supervising particular sections – the meat section, for example – but at lower pay thanregular employees. These practices penalize working parents and maintain corporate control over
employees, since any employee who wants a full wage must essentially agree to be constantly
available to work and ready to accept transfers involving relocation. That makes it harder, as
reformers have long argued, to advance equal opportunity or improve general work conditions.
Suganuma Tomoko, one of the most prominent lawyers supporting equal opportunity plaintiffs,
told me that 1998 was thought to be the “divide” when non-regularization replaced dual-track
personnel systems as the core obstacle to the advancement of equal opportunity (interview, 10
September 2004). In other words, the main target of litigation shifted from assigning women to
non-career tracks, to employing them as non-regular rather than regular workers. This reflects
the falling legitimacy of the dual-track system, which is out of step with the young generation’s
support for gender equality at a time of rapidly expanding use of non-regular workers generated
by the pressure to cut labor costs.
The number of large firms using dual-track personnel systems fell to 46.7 percent by 2003,
according to MHLW. Moreover, recent MHLW investigations indicate that many other firms,
especially in the financial sector, have abandoned dual-track systems in the last year or so. That
is not a wholly positive trend, however, since most firms simply use non-regular women rather
than clerical-track women to perform the same jobs. Indeed, the dual-track system is showing
surprising signs of life. The share of mid-size firms (100-299 employees) using dual-track
systems rose three points to 13.7 percent from 2000 to 2003. (Smaller firms typically ignore
troublesome labor laws, and thus have less need to justify questionable personnel practices.) A
recent report from MHLW’s ongoing equal opportunity committee observed that companies thatuse dual-track systems promote very few women to managerial level – in the bureaucratic
committee-speak of such reports, that suggests that these firms tend to be active discriminators.
[3]
One standard estimate puts the percentage of female managers in Japan at about 9 percent,compared to 30 percent in Britain and 45 percent in the US. According to MHLW, womenaccounted for just 2.7 percent bucho (department heads), 5 percent of kacho (section chiefs), and11 percent of kakaricho (low-level supervisors) in 2004. A survey conducted last March by theJapan Institute of Workers’ Evolution, a quasi-public organization that promotes women’s
advancement, verified that many firms rarely promote women. Of 409 firms surveyed, 79

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

84

percent had no female bucho, 55 percent no female kacho, and 19 percent no female kakaricho.
Typically, the smaller the firm, the greater the gender inequality. Thirty-nine percent of the firms
did not expect to increase the share of women in managerial positions in the next five years.
Furthermore, only 4.4 percent of the firms had established numerical targets to increase thenumber of female kanrishoku (mid- and upper-level managers). Studies of the US that are wellknown in Japan demonstrate that clear targets, along with active participation by senior managers,
are essential to breaking through glass ceilings.
UnionsJapanese unions, like their counterparts elsewhere, historically neglected non-regular workers,
because enterprise unions often share managers’ propensities to regard low-cost non-regular
workers as buffers protecting the company and its regular employees. It was a logic that wasparticularly compelling for unions representing workers in large enterprises who enjoyedsubstantial employment security. After three decades of suffering a steady decline in union
membership – from 35 percent in 1975 to under 19 percent today – the mainstream union
movement knows that it has to start serving female and non-regular workers if it is to reverse thedrift toward irrelevance. According to Yoshimiya Sogo, a senior official in the labor federation
Rengo, eliminating gender differentials and strengthening protections for non-regular workers
are the federation’s top priorities. [4]But union reformers face long odds in efforts to promote the interests of non-regular workers,
many of whom are women. If many Rengo officials are reformers at heart, the federation has no
authority over the enterprise unions, which, Yoshimiya points out, frequently ignore its
directives to help women and part-timers. 95 percent of Rengo unions do not represent parttimers, and most have no desire to do so. The estimated organization rate for part-timers was just
3.0 percent in 2003.
Japanese unions are often most effective in protecting minimum standards and preventing
arbitrary management abuses, but in a stagnant economy they have trouble gaining significant
wage raises or improved benefits. Non-regular workers, who need representation most, are often
reluctant to pay union dues or attend meetings since they can’t perceive the benefits. There isalso a low level of understanding of unions, especially among younger people. I was recently
told by local union officials operating around Tokyo’s Kameido district that members often quit
unions even when the unions manage to maintain or raise wage levels because they do not realize
how their interests are served. (Local unions are primarily tiny organizations with low-paid
and/or volunteer staff, and the progressive outlook of social activists.)
Childcare leave
Although the push for equality on the part of some in business and government is largely
motivated by fears of the low birthrate, progress in strengthening childcare support, critical toexpanding the female work force, is at best erratic. Official statistics show that most eligible
women take childcare leave. But these statistics leave out the majority, the approximately twothirds of women workers who quit work when they become pregnant.

Weathers: Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women – What Progress?

85

Pregnant women often quit rather than take childcare leave because they are reluctant to force
extra work on coworkers during their leave. Indeed, many women who do take childcare leave
experience considerable resentment among coworkers who have to cover the extra work. Nihon
Keizai Shinbun (Nikkei, 9 May 2005) reports that female rather than male employees seem todraw the parceled-out work, and have practically no chance of improving their job ratings byworking harder – instead, the extra workload results in more problems and errors.
Although the law prohibits dismissing or penalizing people for taking childcare leave, it is
widely believed that women who take leave frequently face “disadvantageous treatment” if not
outright dismissal. (Men have the legal right to childcare leave as well, but they are even more
vulnerable, and rarely take it.) As a result, strengthening the childcare leave right is one of themain subjects under review. The government has also made expanding daycare a priority even as
it tacitly encourages daycare centers to hire low-paid non-regular workers to hold down costs.
Rising insecurity
Until relatively recently, near-full employment (for men) helped to maintain a high level of
economic security, but that has been changing with the rising rates of divorce, non-marriage, andyouth unemployment. The number of single-mother households rose by 30 percent to 1.22
million from 1998 to 2003. Women have become much more willing to abandon annoying or
abusive spouses, particularly since marriage no longer provides a strong guarantee of economic
security. However, most women seeking to return to the work force after bearing and/or raisingchildren are relegated to non-regular positions paying low wages. Single mothers do a little
better than others in finding regular positions, but their incomes remain low. In 2002, according
to MHLW, single-mother households had average incomes of just 2.2 million yen, compared to
3.9 million yen for single-father households.
Finally, sexual harassment in the workplace remains a serious impediment to women’s economic
advance. The Revised EEOL clearly proscribed sexual harassment, but it still accounts for 80
percent of the discussions conducted for women at Equal Opportunity offices (Nikkei, 18
January 2005). These discussions generally take place after a woman’s appeal to the company
has been rejected. The woman is especially likely to lose her job if the violator is a top manager,
as is often the case. Non-regular workers are especially vulnerable, and in extreme cases,
harassment can lead to severe depression or even suicide. Local union officials say theysometimes negotiate with employers on behalf of victims, but that they are usually limited todemanding more severance pay. The amounts are small, they say, but the real purpose is toprovide moral support and bolster the worker’s self-esteem. Labor ministry officials and labor
representatives in the equal opportunity committee want to add teeth to anti-sexual harassment
rules, but employers are likely to veto such measures.
Marriage over work, again?
There are signs of a shift in the consciousness of young women, at least those qualified forwhite-collar occupations (Nikkei, 22 June 2005). Some observers report a significant shift in
attitudes among many young Japanese women, towards preferring marriage over careers. These
women, the thinking goes, are increasingly aware that a business career can be a grind. It is theWomen and Japan’s Political Economy

86

common wisdom for instance that women in the first “post-EEOL” generation – those who took
career jobs around 1985 to 1995 – tended to work furiously in order to succeed in the maledominated business world, yet all too often found their careers unrewarding because of lack ofacceptance from male coworkers, persistent glass ceilings (barriers to promotion for women),and neglect of their personal lives. A very high proportion of the few women who reachedmanagement rank never had children (this phenomenon is not, of course, limited to Japan).
Throw in the problems of long work hours and declining job-and-income security, and it is no
surprise that many young women seem to be leaning toward other options, including marriage
and alternative work, even if the pay is low. But that spells potentially big economic trouble for asociety that is about to see its working-age population decline. Business and political leaders
may soon have another compelling reason to get serious about reforming the country’s
employment practices.
Notes[1] AERA, 15 August 2005, pp. 72-77.
[2] See the January 2005 issue of Business Labor Trend, a monthly Japanese-language
publication of the quasi-governmental Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training.
[3] The report, regarding the July 27th session, was posted on MHLW’s website on August 3rd.
[4] Interview, 11 September 2004. Yoshimiya is also one of the labor representatives in theongoing EEOL deliberations. Rengo, which selects all the labor representatives, has at best
limited contact with women’s groups.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

87“Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan: Gender and Class Dimensions ofIncome and Employment”
FUJIWARA Chisa
January 2, 2008
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Fujiwara-Chisa/2623
While Weathers highlights structural issues facing working women more generally
in Japan, Chisa Fujiwara focuses specifically on the plight of single mothers. Fujiwara
analyzes the intersections between gender and class in Japan, especially with regard tofactors inhibiting single mothers from achieving self-sufficiency. The author aptly notesthat in most studies of Japanese society, poverty and social class receive little to no
attention. This oversight may result from assumptions that Japan is an affluent,homogeneous nation with a large comfortable middle class and no poverty. Fujiwara
explains that 90% of the Japanese population self-identifies with this “middle class myth.”
However, she demonstrates that the everyday realities of many individuals, including
single mothers, present a challenge to this constructed notion. Along with ethnic and racial
diversity, Japan features a far greater spectrum of socio-economic class differences than isoften recognized.
Most single mothers in Japan are middle-age women who married, had children, andthen divorced. According to Japan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications,divorce rates have experienced an upward trend since the 1960s, reaching a peak in 2002
(290,000 total divorces) with another high point in 2010 (251,000). Fujiwara explains thatin response to this trend, the Japanese government implemented welfare reforms for single
mothers in 2003. For example, welfare restructuring imposed a time limit to reduce thetotal amount of “dependent children’s allowance” that a single mother may receive. At thesame time, despite new legal requirements for child support payments, child support isoften not enforced and thus not a guarantee for women. Rather than implementing
measures for enforcing child support payments, the 2003 regulations limit the amount oftime women may receive benefits and emphasize the need for single mothers to participate
more in the workforce. However, over 80% of Japanese single mothers already work, ahigh percentage when compared with their counterparts in a majority of industrializedcountries around the world. This statistic challenges the assumption that most mothers inJapan are “professional housewives” (shufu). Beginning in the Meiji Era (1868-1912) ofJapanese modernity, womanhood became directly tied to domesticity through the statesupported ideal of woman as “good wives, wise mothers.” In the postwar era, the image ofa professional housewife revitalized this gender ideal and government policies promoted
marriage rather than active participation in the labor force as a form of lifetime
employment for women. In reality, many women still engage in the workforce following
what scholars refer to as the “M-curve.” Fujiwara explains that it remains common forJapanese women to work until marriage and childbirth (first peak in the M) and then to
return to the workforce after the children go to school full time or leave home(second peakin the M). This pattern places extra strain on single mothers, most of whom must change
their work status quickly following a divorce.
Funded by the Japanese Department of Labor, Fujiwara joined a group of
researchers to study work patterns among single women. Their findings suggest that eventhough a large percentage of women work, due to the very issues highlighted in Weathers’

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

88

article, these women cannot earn enough to become economically independent. In fact,many “fatherless families” live way below the poverty line. Fujiwara identifies significant
class differences, especially educational attainment, as greatly affecting a single mother’sability to secure permanent well-paid employment. She concludes that to raise theincomes of single mothers, the government must target not only work opportunities, butalso foster “greater chances for educational advancement.” In the end, Fujiwara continues
to challenge assumptions about the invisibility of social class and poverty in Japan. After
more than a decade of recession, the author states that it is time to shift notions ofgendered and classed inequalities in Japanese society.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan89

Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan: Gender and Class Dimensions ofIncome and Employment
Fujiwara Chisa
Since the 1990s, Japan has experienced an increase in the number of single parent families due toa significant rise in the divorce rate. In response to this trend, the Japanese government
introduced welfare reforms in 2002, which aimed to limit welfare expenditures for single
mothers and strengthen mothers’ self-sufficiency through work. Becoming self-sufficientthrough work, however, is not just a matter of will and effort. As I will show in this paper, asingle mother’s ability to find employment is strongly influenced by her educational and classbackground, an issue which until recently has received comparatively little attention. In what
follows, I examine single motherhood in Japan from the perspective of social class. Poverty andsocial class are rarely discussed in studies of Japanese society, in part because Japan is widely
considered to be a quite affluent and egalitarian society. However, social class, which is chiefly
explored through educational background in this paper, is an important factor that affects theliving conditions of single mothers in contemporary Japan. [1]Section 1: Single mothers and welfare reform in Japan
Welfare reform
As in other industrialized countries, welfare support for single parent families has become amajor concern of policymakers in Japan. Because of a significant increase in the number ofdivorced and unmarried mothers, as well as their tendency to rely upon public support, welfare
expenditures on single mothers (not including widowed mothers who receive widow's pensions)has been subject to reform in Japan.
In light of these concerns, policymakers in Japan have seen the recent reforms in the UnitedStates and the United Kingdom as an attractive model. In the U.S., welfare reforms introduced in
1996 have tried to limit welfare expenditures through the introduction of welfare-to-work
policies, and have dramatically reduced single mothers’ reliance on cash assistance. Similarly, in
the U.K., the New Deal policy for lone parent families introduced in 1997 aims to reduce poverty
among single parent families through the introduction of welfare-to-work policies. Likewise, inJapan, the dependent children’s allowance (jido fuyo teate), which is the major source of support
for divorced and unmarried mothers, has been subject to restructuring in the past two decades. In
response to increasing demand, policymakers have tightened the conditions for eligibility andreduced both the amount of benefits and the number of recipients in a series of cuts carried out in1985 and 1998. As in the U.S. and the U.K., policymakers in Japan have been concerned with
the increasing caseloads and welfare expenditures.
In 2002, the Japanese government introduced a number of reforms, which aimed to limit welfare
expenditures for single mothers. Since 2003, single mothers have been subject to a time limit,
which reduces the dependent children’s allowance for mothers who have received the allowance
for more than five years or who have been single mothers for more than seven years. In lieu ofcash assistance, a number of services and programs have been extended to support single

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

90

mothers’ access to work and income. The revised law about single-mother families (boshi kafu
fukushi hou) of 2002 stipulates that single parents are given preference in placing their children
into subsidized day care centers. Under the new 2003 regulation for child support enforcement,
single mothers are able to not only lay claim to past unpaid child support payments, but also
ensure that future payments will be taken directly out of the fathers’ paychecks. As work-related
services, the Japanese government is urging local prefectures and cities to establish special job
centers and job training benefits for single mothers.
The characteristics of single mothers in JapanThe goal of these programs is quite similar to that of the welfare reforms introduced in the U.S.
and the U.K. The major objective is to increase employment among single mothers and to makethem economically self-sufficient. On the surface, policymakers in the U.S., U.K. and Japan
seem to face similar problems: burgeoning expenditures on welfare support for single mothers
and increasing numbers of single mothers who rely on public support. However, the situation of
single mothers in Japan differs quite significantly from other industrialized countries in several
ways.
First of all, in comparison with the U.S. and the U.K., single motherhood in Japan is a marginal
social phenomenon. Whereas the share of single mother families among all families withchildren is over 20 percent in the U.S. and the U.K., in Japan, they account for just 7 percent offamilies. Also, unmarried mothers in Japan accounted for only 8 percent of single mothers. In the
United States, by contrast, over 40 percent of single mothers were unmarried. Moreover, mostsingle mothers in Japan are in their 30’s and 40’s. Many become single parents only after
marriage, childbirth, and divorce. Therefore, single motherhood in Japan is largely associatedwith divorced middle-age mothers rather than unmarried teenagers.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

91

Figure 1. Single mothers' workforce participation rate in the early 1990's

Enlarge this image

Another characteristic of single mothers in Japan is that their work participation rate is thehighest in the world, far exceeding the majority of other major industrialized countries (Figure1). In the early 1990's, an astonishing 87 percent of Japanese single mothers (including widows
as well as divorced and unmarried mothers) were working. Even more striking is the fact that
their work participation rate has been over 80 percent for the entire post-war period.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

92

Figure 2. Married mothers' workforce participation rate in the early 1990's

Enlarge this image

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

93

Figure 3. Comparison of workforce participation rate among single mothers and marriedmothers

Enlarge this image

This may come as a surprise, because it is often assumed that most Japanese women arehousewives. Indeed, in the 1990's, only 54 percent of married mothers in Japan were working(Figure 2). This indicates that it remains common for Japanese women to stop working at thetime of marriage and childbirth and to return to the labor market in middle-age. This makes thehigh work participation rate of single mothers all the more striking. As shown by Figure 3, thework participation rate of Japanese single mothers is over 30 percentage points higher than thatof married mothers. A difference in the work rate of single mothers and married mothers in itself
is not so unusual; it can also be seen in the United Kingdom and New Zealand. However, one
particularity about Japan is that the work participation rate of single mothers, though not marriedmothers, is significantly higher.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

94

Figure 4. Trends in the average annual income of households in Japan — including public
and private transfer

Enlarge this image

Since almost all Japanese single mothers are working, one might assume that they are
economically self-sufficient. Unfortunately, because of low salaries, it remains difficult for themto make ends meet on their incomes from work. In the 1990’s, the average annual income ofsingle mothers amounted to less than 40 percent of the average Japanese household income(Figure 4). The increasing disparity in incomes can be explained by the growing number of dualearner families with higher incomes. The low income of single mothers also illustrates persisting
disparities in women’s and men’s average income: the average wage of women remains at about
60 percent that of men. Since the dependent children’s allowance supports mothers with low
incomes, it constitutes a crucial contribution to the welfare of single mothers and their children.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan95

The political background of welfare reform in Japan
One may wonder why, in light of the high work participation rate of single mothers, the Japanese
government has introduced new regulations which aim to strengthen mothers’ self-sufficiency
through work, that is, to reduce state support. It was the continued increase in divorces, andtherefore demand for government assistance, rather than a lack of engagement in work, thatmade policies toward single mother a focus of policy revisions. As Figure 5 shows, Japan’s
divorce rate has increased significantly in the 1990s. Since most single mothers (71% in 2003)
qualify for the dependent children’s allowance because of low income, this led to a significant
increase in the demand for the dependent children’s allowance.
Figure 5. Trends in Japan's divorce rate and the number of single mothers receiving thedependent children's allowance

Enlarge this image

The main reason for the reforms was the government's need to reduce expenditures in order tocut back on deficit financing. In addition, public discourse began to portray the increasing
divorce rate as a modern phenomenon associated with Western countries. It is widely believed

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

96

that higher educational attainment and economic independence among women has contributed to
the rising divorce rate [2]. Based on the assumption that divorcees are making a personal choice,policymakers argued that mothers should not feel entitled to government support. The low
income of single mothers has often been explained by the lack of work experience of women
who became housewives after having children.
Class aspects of single motherhoodã€€What is missing from this picture are the socio-economic dimensions of divorce trends. Many
studies in other industrialized countries have investigated the relationship between single parent
families, poverty, and social class. They have shown how the economic disadvantages of single
parent families are related to class, race, ethnicity, and gender inequality. So far, no analysis of
this kind has been done in Japan. This is in part due to the lack of divorce statistics which specify
socio-economic background. Statistics on single mothers also rarely indicate educational
background and work patterns.
Even more striking is the fact that the Japanese government has no official data assessing thepoverty rate. As a matter of course, the government counts and releases the number of recipientsof public assistance (seikatsu hogo), but does not seem to be interested in how many people fall
through the cracks of the public assistance system. The government does not count the number ofhouseholds living under the poverty line and does not release the take-up rate of public
assistance system. The absence of such data has made poverty invisible in Japan. However, as inother industrialized countries, educational attainment as a factor of class background is an
important issue.
Section 2: Educational attainment and employment patterns among single mothers
Data
In this section, I discuss the findings of a study group which looked at employment support
services for single mothers. This group met between 2000 and 2002 with support from theJapanese Department of Labor. As a member of this group, I conducted several studies
concerned with the work patterns of single mothers. The resulting group report was the firstintensive study on the working conditions of single mothers in Japan.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

97

Appendix. Study group on work support for single mother families

Enlarge this image

Our research examined single parent families from several angles. First, we recalculated andanalyzed several national surveys conducted by major Japanese ministries and government
offices. Until then, raw data about single mother households had not been made available toindividual researchers. The different datasets allowed us to compare the situation of single
parents with that of married parents. We also conducted a quantitative survey with a random
sample of single mothers based on the Population Census. Finally, we collected qualitative data
based on interviews with single mothers. The members of this group were not particularly
concerned with the class dimension of single motherhood. However, unexpectedly, our findings
indicated that there were significant differences in the educational attainment of married parents
and single parents.
Differences in educational backgroundFigure 6 shows the result of a re-calculation of the Employment Status Survey of 1997. Thissurvey is one of the largest government surveys and covers about 20,000 households. Although it
includes single parent households, reports usually do not single out single mothers. The
government however gave us special permission to recalculate the results in order to investigate
the situation of single mothers in greater detail.
Figure 6. Educational attainment of single parents and married parents

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

98

Enlarge this image

Since there had been no existing data on the educational attainment of single mothers in Japan,
and single motherhood is not as strongly associated with race, ethnicity and class in public
discourse as in other industrialized countries. We were surprised to find that the educational
attainment of single parents (mothers or fathers who had no spouse and lived with their own
children under the age of 20) was very low. They tend to be graduates from junior or senior highschool, whereas a significant proportion of married parents (mothers or fathers who lived with
their spouses and their children under the age of 20) are junior college or university graduates.
Among single mothers, 19 percent had not gone beyond junior high school. Among marriedmothers, by contrast, the ratio of junior high school graduates was just 8 percent. Moreover, 10
percent of married mothers have university degrees, whereas only 4 percent of single mothers doso.
The same tendency can be seen among single fathers. 28 percent of single fathers have only ajunior high school degree, as opposed to 12 percent of married fathers. The ratio of single fathers
who are university graduates is 15 percent, a rate lower than half of that of married fathers.
Certainly, in terms of the age structure, single parents are on average older than married parents,
so the differences of the educational attainment may be an effect of age. However, data from the
Population Census also shows that single parents tend to have a lower educational attainment.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan
Figure 7. Marital status of women age 30-39

Enlarge this image

Figure 8. Variation in educational attainment and marital status of women age 30-39

Enlarge this image

99

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

100

The pie chart (Figure 7) depicts the attributes of Japanese women in their 30's based on data fromthe Population Census of 2000. Among this sample of women, 73.8 percent were married, 20.4
percent were unmarried, and only 4.9 percent were divorced. The bar graph (Figure 8) indicatesthe educational attainment of married and divorced women. As shown in the figure, 12 percent
of divorced women have only junior high school degrees. The ratio for married women of thesame age is only 4 percent. Among divorced women only 6 percent were university graduates,
but in the case of married women, 13 percent had university degrees. The same tendency canalso be observed in other age groups and men.
Taking these observations as a point of departure, I will now examine the relationship between
single mothers’ work patterns, incomes and educational attainment. Unfortunately, it is difficult
to perform the same analysis for single fathers because of limited data availability.
Educational attainment and workforce participation among single mothers
Figure 9 illustrates the workforce participation rate of single mothers and married mothers. One
significant finding here is that the workforce participation rate of single mothers with only ajunior high school degree is lower than that of single mothers who are university graduates.
Interestingly, the relationship between educational attainment and workforce participation rate isinverted in the case of married mothers. The workforce participation rate of married mothers islower for university or college graduates. What this means is that highly educated married
women tend not to work because their husbands bring home an ample salary. Japanese social
policies in the areas of tax, insurance and pensions encourage married women to limit theiroutside paid work and remain dependent on their husbands. Consequently, many women stopped
working when they were married.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

101

Figure 9. Educational attainment and workforce participation of single mothers andmarried mothers

Enlarge this image

Changes in women’s work status in becoming a single mother
Another issue that has to be examined is how mothers make the transition from housewife toworker. Our survey allowed us to look at this process through which women became single
mothers more closely. Figure 10 shows changes in the working status of single mothers. Before
they became single mothers, 38 percent of women were not working, meaning that they werefull-time housewives. Immediately after becoming single mothers, this ratio decreased to 17
percent. By the time of survey, only 13 percent were not working. In correspondence with thedecreasing number of non-working mothers, the number of permanent employees among single
mothers increased from 20 percent to 37 percent during the same period. Those without
permanent employment were working part-time, in short-term contracts, or were self-employed.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

102

Figure 10. Work status of single mothers

Enlarge this image

This means that even before the introduction of schemes aiming to promote employment among
single mothers, becoming a single mother has meant for most women entering employment orchanging their work status to full-time or permanent positions. These dramatic shifts in theworking status of single mothers demonstrate their strong incentives to work. It must be added,
however, that these trends do not apply evenly. We found significant differences in theprobability of single mothers finding permanent employment depending on their educational
attainment.
Educational attainment and single mothers’ work status
Figure 11 indicates the workforce participation rate and work status of single mothers before
they became single mothers. As in the case of married mothers, there are no significant

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan103

differences in the workforce participation of single mothers. However, in terms of work status,
only a quarter of single mothers with junior high school degrees held permanent positions,whereas half of single mothers with university degrees worked as permanent employees.
Figure 11. Workforce participation rate and work status — before becoming single
mothers

Enlarge this image

There were also differences in the process through which women became permanent employees(Table 1). The percentage of women who were not working before becoming single mothers but
became permanent employees immediately afterward was 19.1 percent for university graduates,but only 8.6 percent for junior high school graduates. In addition, the ratio of women who werepreviously working as a paato, which refers to quasi part-time jobs, but became permanent
employees immediately after becoming single mothers, was 37.5 percent for university
graduates, but only 14.6 percent for junior high school graduates. It seems therefore that single
mothers with high educational attainment find it easier to find permanent employment than thosewith less educational attainment.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

104

Table 1. Change of work status — immediately after becoming single mothers

Enlarge this image

Further underlining this point, we also found differences in the probability of maintaining aworking status as a permanent employee. More specifically, 66.7 percent of junior high school
graduates who were permanent employees prior to becoming single mothers, as compared to
91.7 percent of those university graduates, continued as permanent employees after becoming
single mothers. This may mean that it is difficult for single mothers with low educational
attainment to keep permanent jobs, even when they worked as permanent employees prior to
divorce. We do not know for certain why low educational graduates have a tendency to lose theirpermanent jobs. But it could be that women who have only low educational attainment are more
vulnerable to losing their job after becoming a single mother.
Changes in women’s work participation rate as single mothers
There are also significant differences in the degree to which single mothers find employment andobtain a position as a permanent employee after becoming single mothers, depending on theireducational attainment.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

105

Figure 12. Workforce participation rate and work status — before and after becoming
single mothers

Enlarge this image

First, according to Figure 12, the overall workforce participation rate of mothers who later
became single mothers is almost the same as that other mothers regardless of educational
attainment; only at the stage of becoming single mothers do we see differences. The workforce
participation rate of single mothers who have higher educational attainment increases rapidly.
The workforce participation rate of single mothers with lower educational attainment, bycontrast, increases only moderately. As a result, at the time of the survey, there are significant
disparities in the overall workforce participation rate: whereas only 77 percent of single motherjunior high school graduates work, 94 percent of single mother university graduates are engaged
in the workforce.
Second, it seems easier for single mothers with higher educational attainment to become
permanent employees. This tendency also applies to the period preceding divorce, and persists
after women become single mothers. For mothers with high educational attainment, work
opportunities expand after they become single mothers. Currently, 54 percent of single motherswith a university degree are working as permanent employees, whereas only 22 percent of single
mothers with no more than a junior high school degree have the same work status.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

106

Educational attainment and income levels
As a final illustration, we will discuss the average income of working single mothers. The
average annual income of working single mothers is 2.5 million yen. For permanent employees,
the average annual income is 3.4 million yen. However, for paato, the average annual income isjust 1.3 million yen. Paato is generally translated as “part-time workers”. The reason why I do
not translate this term as “part-time workers“ is because in reality, ,paato workers do notnecessarily work fewer hours than full-time workers. For example, the average working hours of
single mothers who are working as paato is 33.8 hours per week (2001 JIL Survey). Over half ofsingle mothers who are in paato positions work over 35 hours per week, just like permanent
employees (50.9 percent in 2001 JIL survey, 54.4 percent in 1997 Employment Status Survey).
In Japan, these workers are ironically called “full-time paato.” Therefore, I use the word
“permanent employee” and paato instead of “full-time workers” and “part-time workers”. Insummary, there is a large difference in the annual incomes of permanent employees and paato
workers. However, even though becoming a permanent employee is the ideal for single mothers,
there are significant differences within this status.
Figure 13 shows that there is no difference in wages among paato workers, regardless ofeducational background. However, in the case of permanent employees, we see a large gap. The
average income of single mothers with a junior high school degree who are working aspermanent employees is about 2.5 million yen. By contrast, the average income of university
graduates working as permanent employees is approximately 4.6 million yen. In other words, it
is not only more difficult for junior high school graduates to become permanent employees, butthey also get paid significantly less than university graduates.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

107

Figure 13. Variation of the average annual income of working single mothers byeducational backgrounds

Enlarge this image

In summary, the workforce participation rate of single mothers in Japan is very high even though
half of such women were not working before becoming single mothers. There are, however,significant differences in terms of single mothers’ ability to find jobs as permanent employees
depending on their educational attainment. Single mothers with lower educational attainment
find it more difficult to become permanent employees. Even when they became permanent
employees, they still face a significant wage gap because of their low educational attainment.
Most importantly, there is a tendency for single mothers to have a lower educational attainment
than married mothers.
Section 3: Discussion
These findings have a number of implications for our understanding of single motherhood inJapan. Most observers of single mothers in Japan see their low income from work as the major
problem. Even though Japanese single mothers are working, their incomes are not sufficient tomake ends meet. This is also why the Japanese government has introduced work related services
to reinforce their self-sufficiency through work. Although these are important issues, we alsoneed to ask why the income of single mothers is so low.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

108

Services and programs as a substitute for cash assistanceAs single mothers’ incomes form wages remain low, government assistance in the form of thedependent children’s allowance has played an important role in assuring the welfare of single
mothers and their children. However, the government has tried to reduce welfare expenditures,and in lieu of the dependent children’s allowance, a number of services and programs have been
extended. Daycare services and vocational training programs are important elements forsupporting working mothers, yet since many of them have been in existence for a long time, it isquestionable whether they will significantly change the employment opportunities and incomesof single mothers.
Japanese policies have aimed to support the self-sufficiency of working single mothers throughvarious programs and services. One of the oldest programs, established in 1953, is a low or nointerest loan program (boshi fukushi shikin), which is administered by single mother consultants(boshi soudan-in) in welfare offices. These loans can be used for various purposes, such as
children’s education, vocational training and establishment of a small business such as a dry
cleaning shop or tobacco store.
In terms of affirmative labor market policies, from 1960’s to 1970’s, job centers (koukyo
shokugyo anteijo), which are available nation-wide and serve all types of job seekers as well as
the unemployed, set up special sections for a group labeled ‘hard to employ’ (shushoku kon-nansha). Since that time, single mothers in Japan have been traditionally considered one of the ‘hard
to employ’ groups (other groups including the elderly, disabled, minorities (douwa chiku
syusshin sha), former coal miners and so on), and thus have been eligible for a range of special
work-related programs. Individuals who seek to strengthen their qualifications can also apply for
subsidized vocational training in various job categories. Businesses which employ the ‘hard to
employ’ can apply for a wage subsidy for the first year of their employment.
Although the revised law of 2002 stipulated that single parents be given preference in placing
their children in subsidized day care centers, it is merely a statutory recognition of a continuing
condition for many years. According to a 1998 survey, the majority of single mothers used day
care centers to care for their children (61 percent) or sent them to kindergartens (13 percent). In
contrast to the U.S. and the U.K., where informal and in-home care is common, only 12 percent
of single mothers in Japan reported relying on family members or relatives (2 percent).
In addition, only very limited numbers of single mothers are ensured future child support
payments by the new regulation of 2003. One reason is that in Japan, over 90 percent of divorces
are settled by mutual agreement (kyogi rikon), that is, out of court. Child support payments are
required by Japan’s Civil Code, but are not enforced. Child support enforcement of this kind is
only possible if child support payments have been officially agreed on in a divorce settlement. It
should also be added that since 2002, 80 percent of child support payments are counted toward
the single mothers’ income. Since child support payments even now are not guaranteed, and ahigher overall income decreases the amount of the dependent children’s allowance, the new rulecreates a significant disincentive for single mothers to pursue child support payments.

Fujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan

109

Persistent wage gap between men and women
Even though the income of single mothers is very low in comparison to that of other families, it
should be noted that their income is actually not lower than that of married mothers and other
women. According to our data from the Employment Status Survey of 1997, the average annual
working income of single mothers was 2.2 million yen, whereas the average working income of
married mothers was only 1.9 million yen.
If single mothers are earning more than other women in the workforce, why is there such awidespread perception that their incomes are low? Why do they have difficulties providing forthemselves and their children, even though they earn more on average than married mothers andall women? Evidently, this is not because of a lack of effort, but rather because the average wageof men is significantly higher than that of women. The average wage of married fathers was 5.9
million yen in 1997. Adding to this, many families now have two wage earners. Single mothers,by contrast, have to bring up their children with just one income in a gendered labor market.
Consequently, these families find it difficult to maintain the same standard of living as twoparent families.
A further observation deals with the persistent wage gap between men and women in Japan andthe generally difficult working conditions facing women. According to the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP), Japan ranks 42nd in the world on the Gender Empowerment
Measure (GEM) in 2004. In terms of the Human Development Index (HDI), however, it ranks
7th in the world. To address this disparity between a high human development index andcontinuing gender inequalities, the Japanese government has made an effort to promote a genderequal society, and has also shifted its social policy model from a male-breadwinner family with afull-time housewife to dual-earner family. Evidently, addressing gender inequalities is an
important element for improving women’s status, especially in the area of the labor market.
Yet, from the perspective of single mothers, this approach to gender-equality through social
policy is not entirely satisfactory. In essence, even though an increase in working women andworking mothers may be seen as an improvement in women’s status, it has adverse effects on
single mothers: the increase in working women and dual-earner couples has the potential toamplify the disparity between the incomes of one-parent and two-parent families. It may make iteasier for women in general to work, but will not necessarily help them to earn a living wage.
Class dimensions of single motherhood
A final point concerns the continuing increase in the divorce rate in Japan in the 1990's. It is
widely believed that the rising divorce rate is a consequence of the higher educational attainment
and economic independence of women. This view has also justified a reduction in welfare
expenditures for single mothers’ families, and a growing focus on self-sufficiency through workover government assistance. However, as I have shown in this paper, the educational attainmentof single parents actually tends to be lower than that of married parents.
I suppose that there are two potential explanations for this. First, those with lower educational
attainment have a higher tendency to divorce or become widowed than couples with higher

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

110

educational attainment. The other possible explanation is that it may be more difficult for thosewith lower educational attainment to remarry. Unfortunately, there is no available empirical datato confirm these hypotheses. In Japan, as described in Figure 14, however, the trends in the
divorce rate are quite similar to those in men’s unemployment rate. In the 1990's, Japan was
mired in a serious recession which caused unemployment to rise to unprecedented levels. It
could be argued that since divorced men and women tend to have a lower level of educational
attainment, an increasing risk of unemployment might lead to a rise in the tendency to divorce.
Figure 14. Trends in Japan's divorce rate and men's unemployment rate

Enlarge this image

It is often assumed that marriage in Japan is a system of economic security for women. Marriage,in other words, is often considered as the lifetime employment of women. However, this only
applies to cases where the husband is able to provide for his wife and children on a single salaryand has job security. As we have seen, however, although 38 percent of women are housewives
prior to divorce, many women do work not only prior to but during marriage and after giving
birth to children, possibly for financial reasons. Unfortunately, there is no data that can clearlyshow the relationship between unemployment, divorce, educational attainment, andsocioeconomic background. However, it could be argued that individuals and families with aFujiwara: Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan111

lower educational attainment are more vulnerable to economic crisis than those with higher
educational attainment, and that for women in such situations, marriage does not constitute a
reliable source of economic security. In light of the difficult living conditions of single motherswith lower educational attainment, as well as their high representation among single mothers,
there seems to be little evidence to support the claim that the recent increase in divorce andsingle mothers is a sign of women’s growing economic independence. Instead, it might be better
considered as a sign of a declining ability for women to rely on husbands and marriage for theirlivelihood.
Section 4: Conclusion
My analysis highlights several distinctive aspects about the situation of single mothers in Japan.
First, unlike in most advanced industrialized nations, there are comparatively few single mothers
in Japan. In addition, whereas limited participation in the workforce, and reliance on the welfare
system has become a problem in other countries, in Japan the workforce participation rate ofsingle mothers is strikingly high. It may be that because of the limited presence as well as highworkforce participation rate, single mothers have attracted relatively little attention in public
discourse. There are no stories of “welfare queens” who take advantage of the welfare state, or
the reproduction of single parenthood through teenage pregnancy. Most importantly, rather thanbeing part of a disadvantaged class or minority group, single mothers have been assumed to be
middle class women whose choice to divorce is facilitated by their educational attainment and“economic independence”. This trend may also have been influenced by the general assumption
Japan is a middle-class society, since 90 percent of the population identify themselves as such.
Consequently, social class is not only invisible, but has also not been considered as a factor
influencing the situation of single mothers in Japan. Since single mothers also earn on average
more than married women, one might not consider them to be in a disadvantaged position.
However, as my analysis has shown, single mothers have on average a lower educational
attainment than other mothers, meaning that many come from lower-class backgrounds. There
are also significant disparities in incomes as well as ability to secure a permanent job among
single mothers. The low income of single mothers is not only a consequence of gender inequality
in the labor market, but is also due to lack of work opportunities for women with a lower
educational attainment. Even though some single mothers with university education may doquite well, those with less than a senior high school degree face great difficulties. It is difficult
for mothers with a junior high school degree to obtain a permanent job, and even when they do,their incomes are significantly lower than those of mothers with university degrees. To raise theincomes of single mothers, therefore, involve not only work opportunities, but also greater
chances for educational advancement.
Viewed from this perspective, recent cuts in welfare support for working single mothers in Japan
may cause great difficulties for single mothers with low educational attainment and income.
Rather than chastising single mothers for their personal choices, policies need to address the
problems and difficulties single mothers face as part of the working poor. After a decade ofrecession, it is high time to dismantle the middle-class myth and address existing classinequalities in Japanese society.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

112

Fujiwara Chisa is an Associate Professor in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at
Iwate University. She is the coauthor with Aya Ezawa of “America fukushi kaikaku saikou[Reconsidering U.S. Welfare Reform : An Analysis of Welfare Policies and Their Implications
for Japan].” Kikan shakai hosho kenkyu [The Quarterly of Social Security Research] Vol.42,
No.4. p.407-419.
This is a revised and expanded version of a paper that appeared in Japonesia Review on
September 14, 2007. Posted at Japan Focus on January 2, 2008.
Notes:[1] The author would like to thank Aya Ezawa for help in revising this paper.
[2] The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (kosei rodo sho) in a bulletin (No.102, May 192003) on the reforms explained: "There are a variety of the reasons behind the rise in divorce,and one can not pinpoint out a particular one. However, one of the factors is a decrease in the
difficulties of divorcing compared to before, due to a change in attitudes toward divorce andincreasing economic independence among women."
References:
Ezawa, A. and Fujiwara, C. (2005a). “Lone Mothers and Welfare-to-Work Policies in Japan andthe United States.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare Vol.32, No.4. p.41-63.
Fujiwara, C. (2005b). “Hitorioya no shugyo to kaisosei [Class Aspects of Single Parents’ Work
Patterns].” Shakai-seisaku gakkai shi [The Journal of Social Policy and Labor Studies] No.13.
p.161-175.
Fujiwara, C. (2007a). “Boshisetai no kaiso bunka [Class Differences among Single MotherHouseholds: Identifying Policy Targets based on the Characteristics of Recipients of State
Assistance].” Kikan kakei keizai kenkyu [Japanese Journal of Research on Household
Economics] No. 73. p10-20.
Fujiwara, C. and Ezawa, A. (2007b). “America fukushi kaikaku saikou [Reconsidering U.S.
Welfare Reform : An Analysis of Welfare Policies and Their Implications for Japan].” Kikan
syakai hosho kenkyu [The Quarterly of Social Security Research] Vol.42, No.4. p.407-419.
Fujiwara, C. (2007c). “Koyo to fukushi no saihen [Reorganization of Work and Welfare].” M.
Adachi et. al (eds.) Feminist politics no sintenkai [The Evolution of Feminist Politics]. Akashi
shoten.
Nihon rodo kenkyu kiko [The Japan Institute for Labour] (2003). Boshisetai no haha e no syugyo
sien ni kansuru kenkyu [A Study on Work Assistance for Single Mothers]. JIL Research Report
No.156.
(Summary in English here.)Yamaguchi and Field: Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace

113

Asia-Pacific Journal Articles Recommended for Further Reading“Women in Japanese Local Politics: From Voters to Activists to Politicians”
Yasuo TAKAO
January 29, 2008
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Yasuo-TAKAO/2647
This article is highly recommended, and readers are encouraged to read the following
introduction and corresponding article immediately after Tomomi Yamaguchi’s and Norma
Field’s essay. The article is a revised and expanded version of an essay that was previously
published as “Japanese women in grassroots politics: building a gender-equal society from thebottom up” in The Pacific Review, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp. 147-172 (May 23, 2007). The
permalink for the article is http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09512740701306790.
This article addresses further some of the themes presented in the first two essays
including women’s rights, activism, and political participation. The author Yasuo Takao
explores the political roles of women, including the possibilities for alternative approaches
to improve representative democracy in Japan. Takao explains that women’s engagementin politics increased in the 1990s, particularly with the 1999 Basic Law of Gender-Equality
in Society and the “unprecedented success of grassroots campaigns to increase women’sshare of seats in local elections.” In addition, the one-party dominance of the Liberal
Democratic Party (LDP) that defined post-WWII Japan since 1955 came to an end in 1993.
The subsequent electoral system reforms included proportional representation, which
seemed to create a more favorable environment for successfully running female
candidates.
Along with placing women in political positions, organizations such as the Ichikawa
Fusae Foundation created training centers to help more women gain access to practicalknowledge and political education. Ichikawa Fusae (1893-1981) was a feminist leader who
worked for women’s suffrage in the pre-WWII era. She became one of the first women
elected to the Diet in 1952 and served a total of five terms. In her honor, the Foundation
offers grassroots political training to help women receive hands-on experiences with key
decision-making processes.
Further expanding the meaning of political engagement, organizations such as theLife Club Consumers Co-operative Union (Seikatsu Kurabu) play a crucial intermediary rolein achieving policy decisions. The Tokyo Citizens’ Network coordinates “policy
consultation between citizens and the metropolitan administration.” By hosting
conferences and special citizen input sessions, the Network achieves legislation on
concerns salient to women, especially food safety for children, air quality controls, andmeasures to address domestic violence. Other Non-Profit Organizations (NPOs) also offer
women alternative opportunities for political involvement including recycling centers,
tree-planting activities, and clean-energy campaigns.
Despite all of these advancements, Takao explains that there remain certain
limitations for women’s access to political power in Japan. Some women’s networks
require a rotation system to allow for a greater number of participants. This system limits
the benefits individual female candidates can receive from the Diet structure that privileges
lifetime male politicians. In 2007, mergers of municipalities restructured local elections

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

114

and severely altered the power of local grassroots groups, the specific kinds of groups thatfemale candidates utilize. Organizations such as the Gender Equality Bureau continue tofight against such inequities. According to data accessed in 2012, in 2009 Japan’s House ofRepresentatives included only 16.7% female candidates, a statistic the Bureau seeks toexpand to a full 30% by 2020. This goal will be challenged by the increasing prominence ofneoliberal policies in Japan. Takao uses the term “neo-liberalism” in reference to economic
rationalism that celebrates the unbridled rule of the market throughout society anddecreases spending for social services. In this context, Takao notes that gender plays asignificant role, particularly as women struggle to reconnect political equality witheconomic equality.
In his conclusion, Takao presents an encouraging view that despite ever-present
barriers, Japanese women’s groups work to overcome gendered structures and to promotesocial renewal. This article provides students of contemporary Japan with both usefulstatistics for quantitative analysis, along with qualitative explanations of how specificgroups engage with ongoing pressures against women in politics.
For Mire Koikari, “Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952”“U.S. Courts-Martial in Occupation Japan: Rape, Race, and Censorship”
Terese Svoboda
May 23, 2009http://www.japanfocus.org/-Terese-Svoboda/3148.
This article addresses how the U.S. Occupation in Japan censored cases of rape. The author
presents evidence from her own family history to examine the correlations between sexual
violence, race relations, and U.S. attempts to suppress rape reports.
“The Cold War Explodes in Kobe—The 1948 Korean Ethnic School ‘Riots’ and US
Occupation Authorities”
Mark E. Caprio
November 24, 2008
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Mark-Caprio/2962.
This article offers another historical case for challenging the “triumphant narrative” of the
U.S. Occupation of Japan. The author discusses protests in Kobe after U.S. occupiers
instructed Japanese authorities to close Korean ethnic schools.
“Occupation Authorities, the Hatoyama Purge and the Making of Japan’s Postwar
Political Order”
Juha Saunavaara
September 28, 2009http://www.japanfocus.org/-Juha-Saunavaara/3229.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

115

The author addresses how the General Headquarters (GHQ) leaders decided to purge
politician Hatoyama Ichirō and support Yoshida Shigeru as the first postwar Prime Ministerof Japan in 1946.
“The Allied Occupation of Japan—An Australian View”
Christine de Matos
July 27, 2005
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Christine_de-Matos/1765.
While most works focus solely on the role of U.S. occupiers in Japan, other Allied Powers
including Australia were involved in this complex rebuilding process. This article
summarizes some of the main contributions of the Australian occupiers. The author also
published an article more specifically on Australian women in the occupation.
For Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field, “Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace”“Why I Went to Iraq: Reflections of a Japanese Hostage”
Noriaki IMAI and Norma Field
December 29, 2007
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Imai-Noriaki/2620.
Imai, who travelled as an individual citizen to Iraq to bear witness, discusses why hedecided to go to Iraq, his experiences in Iraq, and his struggles to deal with intolerant“bashing” in Japan.
“Engendering the Concept of Peace: On Violence Against Women”
Ruri ITO
April 3, 2003
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Ito-Ruri/2309# published XX
Ito discusses positive peace as a gendered concept, one that requires attention to thepolitics of dealing with Japan’s wartime violence against women.
“The Women’s Active Museum on War and Peace: Its Role in Public Education”
Rumiko NISHINO
December 16, 2007
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Rumiko-NISHINO/2604.
This article, written by the Director of WAM, explains the role of the museum in educating
the public on wartime violence against women.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

116“Article Nine in Context – Limitations of National Sovereignty and the Abolition of
War in Constitutional Law”
Klaus Schlichtmann
June 8, 2009http://www.japanfocus.org/-Klaus-Schlichtmann/3168
The author offers a historical and comparative examination of the “peace” clause in Japan’s
postwar constitution.
For Yasuo Takao, “Women in Japanese Local Politics”“Japan’s Worker Co-operative Movement into the 21st Century”
Bob Marshall(No date)
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Bob-Marshall/1704
In the context of the co-operative movement across Japan, Marshall discusses women’s
worker co-operatives and the Seikatsu Club referenced by Takao.
“Japan Gender Conflict Sparks Censorship Debate”
Tony McNicol
March 23, 2006
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Tony-McNicol/2114
McNicol provides a brief summary of an incident surrounding a cancelled lecture bygender-rights advocate and leading scholar Chizuko Ueno.
“Fukushima Women Against Nuclear Power: Finding a Voice from Tohoku”
David Slater
November 9, 2011
http://www.japanfocus.org/events/view/117
This article presents the role of women as political activists following the devastation of the
3/11 earthquake and subsequent nuclear disasters.
“Japan’s Grassroots Pacifism”
Mari YAMAMOTO
February 24, 2005
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Mari-YAMAMOTO/2102
Analyzing peace movements in Japan, Yamamoto includes a section on the role ofhousewives and women in postwar pacifist activism.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

117

For Charles Weathers, “Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women—What Progress?”“The Development and Structure of Japanese Enterprise Unions”
John Benson
November 3, 2008
http://www.japanfocus.org/-John-Benson/2938.
The author assesses the current situation of Japan’s unionism in light of the economic
struggles since the turn of the 21st century.
“Lifetime Employment in Japan: Concepts and Measurements”
Hiroshi ONO
April 26, 2006
http://www.japanfocus.org/data/Ono.pdf
The author explains that assumptions about the realities of Japan’s “lifetime employment”
system are difficult to isolate, define, and measure. However, he presents evidence thatfirms continue to offer regular male employees at least some version of lifelong job security.
“Sexual Harassment: The Emergence of Legal Consciousness in Japan and the US”
Chika SHINOHARA and Christopher Uggen
August 3, 2009http://japanfocus.org/-Christopher-Uggen/3199
This article discusses a rising consciousness about sexual harassment claims and anincrease in women reporting to local Equal Employment Offices in 2008.
“Gender, Equity and the Japanese Welfare System”
Philip Brasor
October 31, 2011
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Philip-Brasor/3625
The author discusses comments about changes to the social security system and otherissues made by the first female to be appointed to Japan’s Ministry of Health, Welfare, andLabor, Yoko KOMIYAMA.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

118“Women and Japan’s New Poor”
J. Sean Curtin
May 19, 2005
http://www.japanfocus.org/-J__Sean-Curtin/1641
This article provides divorce rates and a case study of how a single mother is affected by
Japan’s welfare reforms.
“Turning Back the Clock on Gender Equality: Proposed Constitutional Revision
Jeopardizes Japanese Women's Rights”
Satoko KOGURE
May 22, 2005
http://www.japanfocus.org/-Satoko-KOGURE/1814
The author addresses attempts by the Liberal Democratic Party to change Article 24 in theConstitution, one of the articles that protects gender equality.
Recommended Articles from Other Sources
For Mire Koikari, “Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S. Occupation of Japan, 1945-1952”
Mire KOIKARI, “Rethinking Gender and Power in the US Occupation of Japan, 19451952,” Gender and History Vol 11, No 2 (1999): 313-335.
Mire KOIKARI, Pedagogy of Democracy: Feminism and the Cold War in the U.S.
Occupation of Japan, Temple University Press: Tokyo, 2009.
Mire KOIKARI, “‘The World is Our Campus’: Michigan State University and Cold-War
Home Economics in US-Occupied Okinawa, 1945-1972,” Gender and History Vol 24,
Issue (1) (April 2012): 74-92.
Mark McLelland, Love, Sex, and Democracy in Japan during the American Occupation,
New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
For Tomomi Yamaguchi and Norma Field, “Gendered Labor Justice and the Law of Peace”
http://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/index.html
The website for the Gender Equality Bureau of Japan, a resource with Englishlanguage translations of specific legislation, political initiatives, and action policies
for achieving a gender equal Japan.

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

119

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/episodes/japans-about-face/map-japansself-defense-forces-deployments/1275/
Interactive Map Posted by PBS on Japan’s Self-Defense Forces Deployment aroundthe world since 1992.
http://www1.jca.apc.org/vaww-netjapan/english/womenstribunal2000/whatstribunal.html
Violence Against Women in War-Network Japan (VAWW-NET), Website on The
Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery.
For Yasuo Takao, “Women in Japanese Local Politics”“Expansion of Women’s Participation in Policy and Decision-Making Processes in All
Fields of Society,” Japan Cabinet Office Gender Equality Bureau, Goal 2020,
http://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/mge/process/index.html
The Fusae Ichikawa Memorial Association, Bibliography and Timeline of Fusae
Ichikawa, http://yoshtec.com/japanologie/07.pdf
Robin LeBlanc, Bicycle Citizenship: The Political World of the Japanese Housewife,
Berkeley: University of California, 1999.
LeBlanc examines women’s everyday experiences with politics, especially how theynavigate political spaces as “bicycle citizens,” a view that represents a more femalecentered approach to democratic participation.
Seikatsu Club Consumer’s Co-operative Union, Shinjuku Branch English Website,
http://www.seikatsuclub.coop/english/
The website provides background information on the history of co-operatives inJapan, membership statistics, alternative economic activities, etc.
For Charles Weathers, “Equal Opportunity for Japanese Women—What Progress?”
Japanese Trade Union Confederation (RENGO) English Language Website,
http://www.jtuc-rengo.org/

Women and Japan’s Political Economy

120

Council of Executives of Public and Private Sectors to Promote Work-Life Balance,“Action Policy for Promoting Work-Life Balance (Revised 2010),
http://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/mge/wlb/index.html
This plan first identifies what constitutes a work-life balanced society. The firstcategory of economic independence targets the employment rate of women ages 2544 to be improved by 8% in 2020.
Hiroya Nakakubo, “‘Phase III’ of the Japanese Equal Employment Opportunity Law,”
Japan Institute for Labor Policy and Training, 2007,
http://www.jil.go.jp/english/JLR/documents/2007/JLR15_nakakubo.pdf
For Chisa Fujiwara, “Single Mothers and Welfare Restructuring in Japan”
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Statistical Handbook of Japan 2011,
Chapter 2 on Japan’s “Population,”
http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/c02cont.htm
Aya EZAWA, “From Welfare to Work: The Conditions of Single Mothers’‘Independence,’” Journal of Political Science and Sociology, Vol 7 (March 2007).
This article explores further the notion of independence, especially economic
independence, and how welfare work policies affect single mothers.
Aya EZAWA and Chisa FUJIWARA, “Lone Mothers and Welfare-to-Work Policies inJapan and the United States: Toward an Alternative Perspective,” Journal of
Sociology and Social Welfare Vol 32, No 4 (December 2005).
The authors provide a comparative perspective between policies on the U.S. andJapan.
“Facts and Figures” on the Japanese Population, Posted by the Gender Bureau,
http://www.gender.go.jp/english_contents/category/pub/pamphlet/women-andmen10/pdf/1-1.pdf