I Basic Policy on Audit
The FY2019 Audit Report constitutes the results of the audit conducted in 2020 based on the Basic
Policy on Audit for 2020.
Basic Policy on Audit for 2020
Approved bythe Audit Commission
on September 10, 2019
To carry out audits for the year 2020 (audit implementation period: October 2019 - September 2020)
efficiently and effectively and to perform its missions accurately in keeping with social and economic
trends, the Board of Audit established its Basic Policy on Audit for the year 2020 as follows:1.

Missions of the Board of Audit

The Board of Audit (the Board) has the following missions as a constitutional organization independent
from the Cabinet.
The Board audits all of the final accounts of the expenditures and revenues of the State every year, andalso audits such accounts as provided by law.
The Board continuously conducts audits, supervises financial management, ensures its adequacy, andrectifies any defects. Also, the Board verifies the final accounts of the expenditures and revenues of theState through the results of its audits.
The Board prepares and sends the Audit Report to the Cabinet. This Report, together with the final
accounts of the expenditures and revenues of the State, shall be submitted to the Diet.
2.

Social and Economic Trends and the Situation Surrounding the Board of Audit

In recent years, Japan’s society and economy have faced difficult challenges, such as accelerated
depopulation, rising social security expenses due to the declining birthrate and the aging population,
stagnant growth potential, and decrepit social infrastructure.
In addition, reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake (the earthquake and tsunami thatoccurred along the Pacific Ocean coast in the Tohoku Region on March 11, 2011, and the resultant
accident at a nuclear power plant) has become an important issue for Japan, therefore, the administrative
authorities are required to deal with these challenges appropriately.
As for the fiscal position of the State government, continual issuance of government bonds is steadily
increasing the outstanding debt, which is estimated to reach about 897 trillion yen at the end of FY2019.
In the budget for FY2019, the level of dependence on government bonds is about 32% and the total
expenditure required for redemption of national debt comprises about 23% of the general accountexpenditure, which imposes a major challenge in achieving a sound fiscal position.
In order to achieve its fiscal consolidation goal of aiming to bring the primary balance including thenational and local government budgets into surplus in FY2025, the State government, under “the NewPlan to Advance Economic and Fiscal Revitalization” that aims for the integrated revitalization of theeconomy and public finances, will promote the following three pillars of reforms comprehensively:“overcoming deflation and revitalizing the economy,” “expenditure reforms” and “revenue reforms.”
Moreover, the importance of grasping the results of the State budget execution and reflecting them inthe following budgets is deliberated in the Diet from the viewpoint of enhancing and strengthening
fiscal administration control by the Diet.
1

Taking into consideration that the Diet requested the Cabinet to submit the final accounts of the Stateearlier, the Board has been striving to submit its Audit Report to the Cabinet earlier than before, whichhelps the Diet deliberate the final accounts of the State earlier and enables the audit results to be further
reflected in the budget. Furthermore, the Board has been steadily undertaking audits requested by theDiet under the provisions of Article 105 of the Diet Act and reporting the audit results to the Diet, as
well as issuing “Special Reports to the Diet and the Cabinet” on an as-needed basis every year for thepurpose of contributing to enhancement of the Diet’s deliberations of the final accounts of the State.
Achievement of fiscal soundness has been an important issue, and importance is placed on the strict
assessment and verification of the results of the State budget execution as well as the Government’s
fulfillment of accountability to the public. Against this backdrop, the role of the Board, which has raised
the awareness of the public on various issues relating to public administration and finance by suchmeans as the Audit Report, has become even more important, and the public expectations for audit
functions are also growing.
3.

Basic Policy on Audit

The Board has been striving to conduct audits in order to respond to public expectations in light ofsocial and economic trends at all times. With the aim of continuing to properly fulfill its missions in thesituation mentioned above, the Board will make every effort to ensure the strict and fair discharge ofits duties and maintain and further improve the quality of audit activities while paying due attention to
the public interest, and will carry out audits in accordance with the following policies.
(1) Focus of audits
In response to Japan’s social and economic trends and its current financial condition, the Board hasdecided to focus its audit activities on the following policy areas of public administration:•Social security•Education, science and technology•

Public works•

Defense•Agriculture, forestry and fisheries•

Environment and energy•

Economic cooperation•

Small and medium enterprises•

Information technology (IT)In addition, the Board enhances cross-cutting audits on policies jointly executed by several ministries
and agencies and cases commonly related with several ministries and agencies, and, if necessary, also
responds to matters of great public concern, in a timely and proper manner.
Furthermore, the Board appropriately and in a timely manner audits various measures for promoting
the reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake according to the status of progress, noting thata large amount of national expenses will be spent during a certain period.
(2) Audits with various audit objectives
2

The Board conducts audits not only to identify and disclose fraudulent and improper cases but also toevaluate the performance of operations and projects. Moreover, the Board conducts audits with a focus
on the necessity of specific operational systems, if necessary.
The Board conducts audits with the following objectives:(a) Accuracy: whether the final accounts accurately reflect the financial status such as theexecution of the budgets(b) Regularity: whether the financial management is properly conducted in conformity withthe approved budgets, laws and regulations(c) Economy: whether the implementation of projects and programs or budget execution isadministered with the minimum cost(d) Efficiency: whether the projects and programs gain the maximum results with the given
cost or have the best cost-efficient outcome(e) Effectiveness: whether the projects and programs achieve the intended results and produce
the expected effects(f) Other objectives necessary for auditing
As for the objectives of accuracy and regularity, the Board continues to duly conduct audits because
there are still many cases of improprieties. The Board focuses on examining basic accountancy whileconsidering the fact that there was fraud and improprieties in some ministries. Furthermore, the Board
conducts audits bearing in mind the competitiveness and the transparency of bidding and contracts.
As for the objectives of economy, efficiency, and effectiveness, in light of the serious financial
condition in recent years, the Board puts greater importance on these objectives. With the objective ofeffectiveness, in particular, the Board actively endeavors to review the results of operations, projects
and budget execution. In such cases, the Board conducts audits with attention to auditees’ selfevaluation of their policies and various measures carried out by the government for efficient andeffective implementation of administrative work and projects. Also, the Board conducts audits withattention to the situations of the assets possessed by the State and funds developed by subsidies.
If there is any problem with the implementation of the operations and projects and the budget execution,
the Board thoroughly investigates the causes and considers measures for improvement and if needed,abolishment of the program.
In addition, to contribute to the improvement of the transparency and accountability of public
administration and finance as well as better project implementation, the Board analyzes the publicfinances of the State and evaluates the government’s efforts toward fiscal consolidation, and moreclosely audits the financial status of the special accounts and the incorporated administrative agencies.
In the above cases, the Board utilizes information on public accounting such as financial documents ofspecial accounts prepared with reference to practices of corporate accounting.
(3) Approach corresponding to conditions of internal control
Since the conditions of internal control, such as internal audits and internal checks, in auditees affectthe level of adequacy of financial management to be ensured in auditees, etc., the Board pays due
attention to the effectiveness of the internal control. The Board also requests the auditees to improvetheir internal control systems, if necessary, so that they ensure the adequate level of financialmanagement, etc.
(4) Follow-up of the audit findings
The Board continually checks on the state of improvements made by remedial and preventative
measures against improper and irregular cases to ensure that audit results are reflected in the Statebudget compilation as well as in project implementation adequately and effectively.
3

Moreover, concerning improper financial management in the Audit Report, the Board conducts audits
necessary for improving similar cases with other auditees.
(5) Cooperation with the Diet
The Board always pays attention to the deliberations in the Diet. In auditing issues in response to audit
requests from the Diet, the Board makes every effort to facilitate the Diet’s examination andinvestigation by including the necessary research contents in the Board’s audit activities, paying fullattention to the intention of the Diet’s request. In addition, to contribute to the Diet’s sufficientexamination on the final accounts, the Board makes efforts to actively submit reports to the Diet andthe Cabinet whenever necessary.
(6) Improvement of audit capability
The Board enhances its ability to conduct audits through efforts such as the development of new audit
methods to respond to the increasingly complex society and economy as well as accompanying changes
in the State’s financial and administrative operations.
The efforts include: research studies to vary the method and scope of audit activities, including those inlight of international trends of auditing, human resource development for auditing areas of expertise as
well as recruitment of personnel who have acquired practical skills and experts from the private sector,
and promotion of the use of IT in audit activities. By adopting these practices, the Board conducts amore fulfilling audit for project/program of auditee matters as a whole.
4.

Designing an Appropriate Audit Plan

The Board designs appropriate audit plans and carries them out in order to conduct audits more
effectively and efficiently and to achieve its mission, based on the above-mentioned Basic Policy onAudit.
In the audit plan, the Board establishes its priority audit issues, on which it should focus in audits, taking
into full consideration the scale and content of the budgets of auditees, measures, projects and programs,
the situations of internal control, the previous audits and results, etc.
Also, in auditing, the Board attempts to enhance and strengthen audit activities by promptly and flexibly
responding to the progress status of audits as well as public interests, for example, by reviewing theaudit plan when necessary.

4