CE EMC Test Report(EN 50155 & EN 50121-3-2)
Report No.: CE160519D09-1
Test Model: IVH-9016-PoER505M
Series Model: Vecow IVH-9000 Series, IVH-9016-PoER, IVH-9008-PoER, IVH-9000-2R,
IVH-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(“X” can be 0-9, A-Z or blank for marketing purpose)
Received Date: May 19, 2016
Test Date: May 23 ~ 31, 2016
Issued Date: May 31, 2016
Applicant: Vecow Co., Ltd.
Address: 12F., No. 111, Zhongcheng Rd., Tucheng Dist., New Taipei City 23674
Taiwan (R.O.C.)
Issued By: Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch
Lab Address: No. 47-2, 14th Ling, Chia Pau Vil., Lin Kou Dist., New Taipei City, Taiwan(R.O.C.)This report is for your exclusive use. Any copying or replication of this report to or for any other person or entity, or use of our name or trademark, is permitted
only with our prior written permission. This report sets forth our findings solely with respect to the test samples identified herein. The results set forth in thisreport are not indicative or representative of the quality or characteristics of the lot from which a test sample was taken or any similar or identical productunless specifically and expressly noted. Our report includes all of the tests requested by you and the results thereof based upon the information that you
provided to us. You have 60 days from date of issuance of this report to notify us of any material error or omission caused by our negligence, provided,
however, that such notice shall be in writing and shall specifically address the issue you wish to raise. A failure to raise such issue within the prescribed timeshall constitute your unqualified acceptance of the completeness of this report, the tests conducted and the correctness of the report contents. Unless specificmention, the uncertainty of measurement has been explicitly taken into account to declare the compliance or non-compliance to the specification.The reportmust not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by any government agencies.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 1 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Table of Contents
Release Control Record ............................................................................................................................. 4
1

Certificate of Conformity .................................................................................................................... 5

2

Summary of Test Results ................................................................................................................... 6
2.1
2.2
2.3

3

Performance Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 8
Measurement Uncertainty.............................................................................................................. 8
Modification Record....................................................................................................................... 8
General Information ............................................................................................................................ 9

3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4

Features of EUT ............................................................................................................................ 9
General Description of EUT ........................................................................................................... 9Operating Modes of EUT and Determination of Worst Case Operating Mode ............................... 10
Test Program Used and Operation Descriptions............................................................................ 11
Primary Clock Frequencies of Internal Source .............................................................................. 11
Configuration and Connections with EUT ....................................................................................... 12

4.1
4.2
5

Connection Diagram of EUT and Peripheral Devices ................................................................... 12
Configuration of Peripheral Devices and Cable Connections........................................................ 14
Conducted Disturbance at Auxiliary a.c. or d.c. Power Ports ......................................................... 16

5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
6

Limits .......................................................................................................................................... 16
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 16
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 17
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 18
Radiated Disturbance up to 1 GHz ................................................................................................... 20

6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
7

Limits .......................................................................................................................................... 20
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 20
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 21
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 22
Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (ESD).................................................................................. 24

7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
8

Test Specification......................................................................................................................... 24
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 24
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 25
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 26
Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test (RS) .......................................................... 29

8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
9

Test Specification......................................................................................................................... 29
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 29
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 30
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 31
Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (EFT)....................................................................... 32

9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
10

Test Specification......................................................................................................................... 32
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 32
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 33
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 34
Surge Immunity Test......................................................................................................................... 35

10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4

Test Specification......................................................................................................................... 35
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 35
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 36
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 37

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 2 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

11

Immunity to Conducted Disturbances Induced by RF Fields (CS) ................................................. 38

11.1
11.2
11.3
11.4
12

Test Specification......................................................................................................................... 38
Test Instruments .......................................................................................................................... 39
Test Arrangement ........................................................................................................................ 40
Test Results................................................................................................................................. 41

Pictures of Test Arrangements......................................................................................................... 42

12.1
12.2
12.3
12.4
12.5
12.6
12.7

Conducted Disturbance at Auxiliary a.c. or d.c. power ports ......................................................... 42
Radiated Disturbance up to 1 GHz .............................................................................................. 43
Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (ESD) ............................................................................... 44
Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test (RS) ......................................................... 45
Fast Transients (EFT) .................................................................................................................. 46
Surge .......................................................................................................................................... 48
Radio-frequency common mode (CS) .......................................................................................... 49

Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories ............................................................................. 51

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 3 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Release Control Record
Issue No.

Description

Date Issued

CE160519D09-1

Original release.

May 31, 2016

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 4 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

1

Certificate of Conformity

Product:
Brand:
Test Model:
Series Model:

Sample Status:

High Performance Fanless In-Vehicle System
Vecow
IVH-9016-PoER505M
Vecow IVH-9000 Series, IVH-9016-PoER, IVH-9008-PoER, IVH-9000-2R,
IVH-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(“X” can be 0-9, A-Z or blank for marketing purpose)
Engineering sample

Applicant:

Vecow Co., Ltd.

Test Date:

May 23 ~ 31, 2016

Standards:

EN 50155:2007 +AC:2010 +AC:2012, Clause 12.2.7 & 12.2.8
EN 50121-1:2006 +AC:2008
EN 50121-3-2:2006 +AC:2008
EN 55011:2009 +A1:2010
EN 61000-4-2:2009
EN 61000-4-3:2006 +A1:2008 +A2:2010
EN 61000-4-4:2012
EN 61000-4-5:2014
EN 61000-4-6:2014

The above equipment has been tested by Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd.,
Taoyuan Branch, and found compliance with the requirement of the above standards. The test record, data
evaluation & Equipment Under Test (EUT) configurations represented herein are true and accurate accountsof the measurements of the sample’s EMC characteristics under the conditions specified in this report.

Prepared by :

,

Date:

May 31, 2016

,

Date:

May 31, 2016

Jessica Cheng / Senior Specialist

Approved by :Henry Lai / Director

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 5 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

2

Summary of Test Results
EN 50121-3-2:2006 + AC:2008, Emission
EN 50155:2007 +AC:2010 +AC:2012, Clause 12.2.8.2

Table
ClauseBasic Standard

3.1

EN 55011:2009+A1:2010

6.1

EN 55011:2009+A1:2010

Port

Test Item / specifications

Result/Remarks

Conducted disturbanceAuxiliary a.c. or
9 kHz-150 kHz:d.c. power ports
no limits
Minimum passing- Auxiliary
150 kHz- 500 kHz:
margin is -47.63 dB at
supply99 dBμV quasi-peak
0.39609 MHz
sinusoidal a.c.
500 kHz- 30 MHz:or d.c.
93 dBμV quasi-peakRadiated disturbance
Minimum passing
30 MHz- 230 MHz:
Enclosure
40 dBμV/m quasi-peak margin is -1.76 dB at
230 MHz -1 GHz:
810.01 MHz
47 dBμV/m quasi-peakVerdict

Pass

Pass

EN 50121-3-2:2006 + AC:2008, Immunity requirements,
EN 50155:2007 +AC:2010 +AC:2012, Clause 12.2.7 & 12.2.8.1
Table
Clause

7.1

7.2

7.3

8.1

8.2

Basic standard

EN 61000-4-6:2014

EN 61000-4-4:2012

EN 61000-4-5:2014

Port

Test Item / specifications

Radio-frequency common
Auxiliary a.c.
mode (CS)power input ports
80% AM (1kHz)(rated voltage ≤0.15-80 MHz, 10V
400 Vrms)
Performance Criterion A
Fast Transients (EFT)
Auxiliary a.c.
power input ports 5/50 (Tr/Th) ns, 5kHz
(rated voltage ≤ ±2kV
400 Vrms)
Performance Criterion A
Surges
1.2/50 (8/20) (Tr/Th) μs
Auxiliary a.c.
Line to ground:power input ports±2kV 42 Ω, 0.5 μF(rated voltage ≤Line to line:
400 Vrms)±1kV 42 Ω, 0.5 μF
Performance Criterion B

EN 61000-4-6:2014

Signal &communication,
process
measurement &control ports

Radio-frequency common
mode (CS)80% AM (1kHz)
0.15-80 MHz, 10V

Fast Transients (EFT)EN 61000-4-4:2012

Signal &communication,
process
measurement &control ports

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Result/Remarks

Verdict

Performance
Criterion A

Pass

Performance
Criterion B

Pass

Performance
Criterion A

Pass

Performance
Criterion A

Pass

Performance
Criterion B

Pass

Performance Criterion A

5/50 (Tr/Th) ns, 5kHz
±2kV, Capacitive clamp
Performance Criterion A

Page No. 6 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

EN 50121-3-2:2006 + AC:2008, Immunity requirements,
EN 50155:2007 +AC:2010 +AC:2012, Clause 12.2.7 & 12.2.8.1
Table
Clause9.1

9.2

Basic standard

Port

Test Item / specifications

EN 61000-4-3:2006
Enclosure ports+A1:2008 +A2:2010

EN 61000-4-3:2006
Enclosure ports+A1:2008 +A2:2010

Radio-frequency
electromagnetic field
amplitude modulated(RS)1, 80% AM (1kHz)
80-1000 MHz, 20V/m
Performance Criterion A
Radio-frequency
electromagnetic field fromdigital mobile telephones(RS)2, 80% AM (1kHz)
800-1000 MHz, 20V/m
1400-2100 MHz, 10V/m
2100-2500 MHz, 5V/m

Result/Remarks

Verdict

Performance
Criterion A

Pass

Performance
Criterion A

Pass

Performance Criterion A
Electrostatic Discharges
Pass
Performance(ESD)
Criterion B
9.3
EN 61000-4-2:2009 Enclosure ports ±6kV Contact discharge±8kV Air discharge
Performance Criterion B
Note 1: This limit applies to equipment mounted in the passenger compartments, drivers cab or external to
the rolling stock (roof, underframe). For equipment mounted in all other areas a severity level of 10
V/m may be used.
Note 2: For large apparatus (e.g. traction drives, auxiliary converters) it is often not practical to perform theimmunity test to radiated electromagnetic fields on the complete unit. In such cases the manufacturer
should test susceptible sub-systems (e.g. control electronics). The test report should justify theselection or not of sub-systems and any assumptions made (e.g. reduction of field due to caseshielding).
Note:
1. There is no deviation to the applied test methods and requirements covered by the scope of this report.
2. The above EN basic standards are applied with latest version if customer has no special requirement.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 7 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

2.1

Performance Criteria

General Performance Criteria
The general performance criteria apply for those ports for which no specific performance criteria are defined(e.g. auxiliary ports) in the report.
Performance criterion A: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended during and after the test. No
degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by apermissible loss of performance. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not
specified by the manufacturer, either of these may be derived from the product description anddocumentation, and from what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended..
Performance criterion B: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No degradationof performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level specified by the manufacturer, when
the apparatus is used as intended. The performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance. During the test, degradation of performance is however allowed. No change of actual operatingstate or stored data is allowed. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not
specified by the manufacturer, either of these may be derived from the product description anddocumentation, and from what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended.
Performance criterion C: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is selfrecoverable
or can be restored by the operation of the controls.
2.2

Measurement Uncertainty

Where relevant, the following measurement uncertainty levels have been estimated for tests performed on the
EUT as specified in CISPR 16-4-2:
The listed uncertainties are the worst case uncertainty for the entire range of measurement. Please note thatthe uncertainty values are provided for informational purposes only and are not used in determining the
PASS/FAIL results.
Expended Uncertainty(k=2) (±)

Measurement

Maximum allowable
uncertainty (±)

Conducted disturbance at mains port using AMN,
3.4 dB (Ucispr)
2.78 dB
150kHz ~ 30MHz
6.3 dB (Ucispr)
Radiated disturbance, 30MHz ~ 1GHz
5.20 dB
The other instruments specified are routine verified to remain within the calibrated levels, no measurement
uncertainty is required to be calculated.
2.3

Modification Record

There were no modifications required for compliance.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 8 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3

General Information

3.1

Features of EUT

The tests reported herein were performed according to the method specified by Vecow Co., Ltd., for detailed
feature description, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications or user's manual.
3.2

General Description of EUT

Product

High Performance Fanless In-Vehicle System

Brand

Vecow

Test Model

IVH-9016-PoER505M

Series Model

Vecow IVH-9000 Series, IVH-9016-PoER; IVH-9008-PoER; IVH-9000-2R ;IVH-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(“X” can be 0-9, A-Z or blank for marketing purpose)

Model Difference

For marketing purpose

Sample Status

Engineering sample

Operating Software

Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 7, LinuxPower Supply Rating

6V to 78V, DC-in

Accessory Device

Adapter

Data Cable Supplied

N/A

Note:
1. The EUT is a High Performance Fanless In-Vehicle System with following interfaces:² COM*4 (RS-232/ 422/ 485 w/ auto flow control)² USB 3.0*4 (External)² USB2.0* (Internal)² Isolated DIO*16 (DI*8, DO*8)² CFast card socket² DVI (resolution up to 1920 x 1200 @ 60Hz)² Display*2 (resolution up to 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz)² Line out² Mic. in² LAN (10/100/1000Mbps)*2² POE LAN*16² DC input
2. The EUT was configured with the following key components:
Component

Brand

Model No. or P/N

Spec.

CPU
Memory
SSD
SSD

Intel
Kingston
innodisk
TranscendIntel® Xeon® Processor E3-1505M v5
KVR21S15S8/8
P/N: DGS25-32GD81BW3DC
TS64GSSD370

8M Cache, 2.80 GHz
DDR4 2133MHz SO-DIMM 8GB
2.5” SATA SSD 3MG2-P 32GB
2.5” Solid State Drive SSD370 64G

SSD
CFast

Transcend
innodisk

TS128GSSD420I
P/N: DECFA-32GD09BW1DC

2.5” SATA-3 SSD420 128GB
CFast 3ME3 32GB

3. The EUT uses following adapter.
Brand
MW
Model
GST280A24
Input Power
100-240Vac, 50/60Hz, 4.5A
Output Power
24Vdc, 11.67A, 280.08W Max
Power LineNon-shielded DC (1.0m) with one ferrite core

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 9 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3.3

Operating Modes of EUT and Determination of Worst Case Operating Mode

The EUT is designed with AC power of rating 100-240Vac, 50/60Hz.
For radiated emission evaluation, 230Vac/50Hz (for EN 55022 & EN 55011), 120Vac/60Hz (for FCC Part 15)
had been covered during the pre-test. The worst data was found at 230Vac/50Hz and recorded in the applied
test report.
Test modes are presented in the report as below.
Mode
Test Condition
Conducted emission test
1 Full system, Display1 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + Display2 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + DVI (1920 x 1080, 60Hz)
Radiated emission test
1 Full system, Display1 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + Display2 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + DVI (1920 x 1080, 60Hz)
Immunity tests
1 Full system, Display1 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + Display2 (4096 x 2304, 60Hz) + DVI (1920 x 1080, 60Hz)

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 10 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

3.4

Test Program Used and Operation Descriptions

Emission tests:a. Turned on the power of all equipment.
b. EUT ran a test program to enable all functions.
c.

EUT read and wrote messages from/to HDD/SSD, CFast card and ext. HDDs.

d. EUT sent and received messages to/from Notebook PCs (kept in a remote area) via two UTP
LAN cables.
e. EUT sent messages to ext. LCD Monitors. Then they displayed messages on theirscreen simultaneously.
f.

EUT sent 1kHz audio signal to earphone.

g. Cameras captured video image to LCD Monitors via EUT.
h. Steps c-g were repeated.

Immunity tests:a. Turned on the power of all equipment.
b. EUT ran a test program to enable all functions.
c.

EUT read and wrote messages from/to HDD/SSD and ext. HDDs.

d. EUT sent and received messages to/from Notebook PCs (kept in a remote area) via two UTP
LAN cables.
e. EUT sent messages to ext. LCD Monitors. Then they displayed messages on theirscreen simultaneously.
f.

EUT sent 1kHz audio signal to speaker.

g. Cameras captured video image to LCD Monitors via EUT.
h. Steps c-g were repeated.

3.5

Primary Clock Frequencies of Internal Source

The highest frequency generated or used within the EUT or on which the EUT operates or tunes is 2.8GHz, ,provided by Vecow Co., Ltd., for detailed internal source, please refer to the manufacturer's specifications.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 11 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

4

Configuration and Connections with EUT

4.1

Connection Diagram of EUT and Peripheral Devices

Emission tests:

13
CFast card (J)

DVI

CFast

Display
COM Load*4 (H)

COM*4

11

LCD Monitor (M)12

LCD Monitor (N)2

USB 3.0 HDD*2 (A)Display
Camera*4 (G)8PoE LAN*4
USB 3.0*2

LAN Load*11 (F)7910PoE Load (K)PoE LAN *11

EUT

15

USB 3.0

DIO

USB 3.0

PoE LAN

Audio out

1

AC Adapter (EUT)LCD Monitor (L)Audio in

3
4
5
6

USB Mouse (B)USB Keyboard (C)Earphone (D)Microphone (E)14
DC input

LAN 1

LAN 2

16

16

230VacRemote site

Notebook PC (I)

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 12 / 51

Notebook PC (I)

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Immunity tests:
TEST CONFIGURATION

1
CFast card (M)

DVI

CFast

Display
COM Load*4 (F)

COM*4

2

LCD Monitor (C)2

LCD Monitor (C)Display
Camera*4 (G)6PoE LAN*4
USB 3.0*2
PoE LAN *11

10

6

EUT

USB 3.0

DIO

USB 3.0

PoE LAN

Audio out
Audio in

AC Adapter (EUT)9

LCD Monitor (B)USB 3.0 HDD*2 (A)3487USB Mouse (E)USB Keyboard (D)Speaker(I)Microphone (H)5
DC input

LAN 1

LAN 2

6

6

230VacRemote site

PoE Load (J)Notebook PC (K)Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 13 / 51

Notebook PC (L)Report Format Version: 6.1.2

4.2

Configuration of Peripheral Devices and Cable Connections

Emission tests:
ID

Product

Brand

USB 3.0 Hard DiskWD

USB 3.0 Hard Disk

WD

B.
C.
D.
E.
F.

USB Mouse
USB KEYBOARD
EARPHONEMICROPHONE
LAN Load*11

G.

3M Fixed Mini Indoor
Dome Network
Camera*4

Microsoft
BTC
PHILIPS
Labtec
N/A
3M
3M
3M
3M

Model No.
WDBUZG0010BB
K-PESNWDBUZG0010BB
K-PESN
1113
5200U
SBC HL145
mic-333
N/A
A200MIF-HNG-03
A301MIF-3N
A301MIF-3N
A301MIF-3N

A.

Serial No.

FCC ID

Remarks

WX61A45JRTS8

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

WXF1E15ED8MF

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

9170515772224
G09302046357
N/A
N/A
N/A
T31504053
T31504054
T31504055
T31504056

FCC DOC Approved
E5XKB5122U
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab
Supplied by client
Supplied by client
Supplied by client
Supplied by clientH.

COM Load*4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

I.

Notebook PC
Notebook PC

ASUS
ASUS

PU401L
PU401LE9NXBC002007372
ECNXBC012528528

FCC DoC Approved
FCC DoC Approved

Supplied by client
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab

J.

CFast card

innodisk

CFast 3ME3

N/A

N/A

Supplied by clientK.

POE Load

PLANET

POE-171S

L.

30" LCD MONITOR

DELL

U3011tM.

24" LCD MONITOR

DELL

UP2414QN.

LCD MONITOR

hp

Hstnd-5001-*

AF00445B00108(000)N/A
CN-OPH5NY-74445-2
FCC DoC Approved
84-082L
CN-0W009C2-74445-4
FCC DoC Approved
1L-034L
N/A
FCC DoC Approved

Supplied by client
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab
Provided by Lab

Note:
1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m).
2. Items I acted as communication partners to transfer data.
ID

Descriptions

Qty.

Length (m)1.

Ground cable

1

1.95

2.

USB cable

2

0.5

3.

USB cable

1

4.

USB cable

5.

ShieldingCores (Qty.)

RemarksN

0

Provided by Lab

Y

0Provided by Lab

1.8

Y

1

Provided by Lab

1

1.5

Y

0

Provided by Lab

Audio cable

1

1.2

N

0

Provided by Lab

6.

Audio cable

1

2.45

N

0

Provided by Lab

7.

LAN cable

11

1.2

N

0

Provided by Lab(Yes/No)8.

LAN cable

4

2.0

Y

0

Supplied by client

9.

Data cable

20

0.2

N

0

Supplied by client10.

LAN cable

1

1.2

N

0

Provided by Lab

11.

Display cable

1

2.0

Y

0

Provided by Lab

12.

Display cable

1

2.0

Y

0

Provided by Lab

13.

DVI cable

1

1.8

Y

2

Provided by Lab

14.

DC cable

1

1.0

N

1

Supplied by client15.

AC power cord

1

1.8

N

0

Provided by Lab

16.

LAN cable

2

10

N

0

Provided by Lab

Note: The core(s) is(are) originally attached to the cable(s).

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 14 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Immunity tests:
ID
A.
B.

Product

Brand

Model No.

Serial No.

FCC ID

Remarks

USB 3.0 Hard Disk

PNY

N/A

6GB

N/A

Provided by Lab

USB 3.0 Hard Disk

PNY

N/A

6GB

N/A

Provided by Lab

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

WIDESCREEN FLAT

DELL

2408WFP

24" LCD MONITOR

DELL

U2413f24" LCD MONITOR

DELL

U2413fUSB KEYBOARD

DELL

SK-8115PANEL MONITOR

CN0NN79274261823S
1DMS
CN-06VNX5-72872-42
B-A4HLC.

D.

CN-06VNX5-72872-42
B-A4EL
CN-0J4635-71616-63I076F

E.

MOUSE

HP

M-UAE96

F93A90AN3V42GO7

FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

F.

COM Load*4

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Supplied by client

3M

A200MIF-HNG-03

T31504053

N/A

Supplied by client

3M

A301MIF-3N

T31504054

N/A

Supplied by client

3M

A301MIF-3N

T31504055

N/A

Supplied by client

3M

A301MIF-3N

T31504056

N/A

Supplied by client

Yinwei

YW-001

N/A

N/A

Provided by Lab

3M Fixed Mini Indoor
G.

Dome Network
Camera*4

H.

MICROPHONEI.

SPEAKERKINYO

KSP-25

N/A

N/A

J.

POE Load

PLANET

POE-171S

AF00445B00108(000)N/A

Provided by Lab
Supplied by client

K.

Notebook PC

DELL

Latitude E6520

2ZW55Q1FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

L.

Notebook PC

LenovoL440

R90FCKH8FCC DoC Approved

Provided by Lab

M.

CFast card

innodisk

CFast 3ME3

N/A

N/A

Supplied by client

Note:
1. All power cords of the above support units are non-shielded (1.8m).
2. Items J-L acted as communication partners to transfer data.
ID

Descriptions

Qty.

Length (m)1.

DVI cable

1

1.8

2.

Display cable

2

3.

USB cable

4.

USB cable

5.

ShieldingCores (Qty.)

RemarksY

2

Provided by Lab

1.5

Y

0

Provided by Lab

1

1.2

Y

0

Provided by Lab

1

1.2

Y

0

Provided by Lab

DC cable

1

1.0

N

1

Supplied by client6.

LAN cable

7

10

Y

0

Provided by Lab

7.

Audio cable

1

1.0

N

0

Provided by Lab

8.

Audio cable

1

1.0

N

0

Provided by Lab

9.

AC power cord

1

1.8

N

0

Provided by Lab

0

Supplied by client

10.

Data cable

20

0.2

(Yes/No)N

Note: The core(s) is(are) originally attached to the cable(s).

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 15 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

5
5.1

Conducted Disturbance at Auxiliary a.c. or d.c. Power Ports
LimitsFrequency (MHz)
Quasi-peak, (dBuV)
0.009 - 0.15
no limits
0.15 - 0.5
990.5 - 30
93
Notes: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
2. The limit decreases linearly with the logarithm of the frequency in the range of 0.15 to 0.50 MHz.
5.2

Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. DueROHDE & SCHWARZESCS 30
838251/021
Oct. 26, 2015
Oct. 25, 2016
TEST RECEIVERROHDE & SCHWARZArtificial Mains Network (ForENV216101195
Apr. 25, 2016
Apr. 24, 2017
EUT)
LISN With Adapter
AD10
C03Ada-002
Apr. 25, 2016
Apr. 24, 2017
(for EUT)EMCO L.I.S.N.
3825/29504-2359
Jul. 27, 2015
Jul. 26, 2016
(For peripherals)
SCHWARZBECKArtificial Mains Network (ForNNLK8129
8129229
May 04, 2016
May 03, 2017
EUT)
SoftwareCond_V7.3.7
NANANA
RF cable (JYEBAO)
5D-FB
Cable-C03.01
Sep. 23, 2015
Sep. 22, 2016
With10dB PAD
LYNICS Terminator (For0900510
E1-01-300
Jan. 20, 2016
Jan. 19, 2017
EMCO LISN)
LYNICS Terminator (For0900510
E1-01-301
Jan. 20, 2016
Jan. 19, 2017
EMCO LISN)ROHDE & SCHWARZArtificial Mains Network (For
ESH3-Z5
100220Nov. 13, 2015
Nov. 12, 2016
TV EUT)LISN With Adapter
100220
N/A
Nov. 13, 2015
Nov. 12, 2016
(for TV EUT)
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in Shielded Room No. 3.
3. The VCCI Site Registration No. C-274.
4. Tested Date: May 23, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 16 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

5.3

Test Arrangement

a. The EUT was placed 0.4 meters from the conducting wall of the shielded room with EUT being connectedto the power mains through a line impedance stabilization network (LISN). Other support units wereconnected to the power mains through another LISN. The two LISNs provide 50 Ohm/ 50uH of coupling
impedance for the measuring instrument.
b. Both lines of the power mains connected to the EUT were checked for maximum conducted interference.
c. The tset results of conducted emissions at mains ports are recorded of six worst margins for quasi-peak(mandatory) [and average (if necessary)] values against the limits at frequencies of interest unless themargin is 20 dB or greater.
Note: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver is 9kHz for quasi-peak detection (QP) andaverage detection (AV) at frequency 0.15MHz-30MHz.

V e r t ic a l G r o u n d
R e f e r e n c e P la n e

Te s t R e c e iv e r

EUT
4 0cm

80 cm
L IS NH o r iz o n ta l G ro u n d
R e fe re n c e P la n e
N o te : S u p p o r t u n its w e r e c o n n e c t e d to s e c o n d L IS N .

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 17 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

5.4

Test ResultsFrequency Range

150kHz ~ 30MHz

Input Power

230Vac, 50Hz

Tested by

Justin Liu

Test Mode

Mode 1

No
1
2
3
4
5
6

Freq.
[MHz]
0.19950
0.396090.724221.38672
8.52344
14.45313

Corr.
Factor
(dB)
9.69
9.69
9.70
9.71
9.82
9.87

Detector Function &Bandwidth
Environmental
Conditions

Phase Of Power : Line (L)Reading Value Emission Level[dB (uV)][dB (uV)]
Q.P.
Q.P.
37.28
46.97
41.25
50.94
24.54
34.24
22.86
32.57
28.62
38.44
31.48
41.35

Quasi-Peak (QP), 9kHz
24℃, 73%RH

Limit[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
99.00
99.00
93.00
93.00
93.00
93.00

Margin(dB)
Q.P.
-52.03-48.06-58.76-60.43-54.56-51.65

REMARKS:
1. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
2. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value
3. Correction Factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
4. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 18 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Frequency Range

150kHz ~ 30MHz

Input Power

230Vac, 50Hz

Tested by

Justin Liu

Test Mode

Mode 1

No
1
2
3
4
5
6

Freq.
[MHz]
0.19815
0.39609
0.595314.574228.28906
11.05469

Corr.
Factor
(dB)
9.65
9.65
9.66
9.73
9.78
9.82

Detector Function &Bandwidth
Environmental
Conditions

Phase Of Power : Neutral (N)Reading Value Emission Level[dB (uV)][dB (uV)]
Q.P.
Q.P.
37.84
47.49
41.72
51.37
23.26
32.92
23.61
33.34
26.32
36.10
25.60
35.42

Quasi-Peak (QP), 9kHz
24℃, 73%RH

Limit[dB (uV)]
Q.P.
99.00
99.00
93.00
93.00
93.00
93.00

Margin(dB)
Q.P.
-51.51-47.63-60.08-59.66-56.90-57.58REMARKS:
1. The emission levels of other frequencies were very low against the limit.
2. Margin value = Emission Level – Limit value
3. Correction Factor = Insertion loss + Cable loss
4. Emission Level = Correction Factor + Reading Value

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 19 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6Radiated Disturbance up to 1 GHz

6.1

LimitsFrequency (MHz)dBuV/m (at 10m) / quasi-peak

30 - 23040
230 - 1000
47
Notes: 1. The lower limit shall apply at the transition frequencies.
2. Emission level (dBuV/m) = 20 log Emission level (uV/m).
3. All emanations from a class A/B digital device or system, including any network of conductors
and apparatus connected thereto, shall not exceed the level of field strengths specified
above.
6.2

Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

ESCS 30

845552/004

Cal. Date

Cal. DueROHDE & SCHWARZTEST RECEIVER

Sep. 03, 2015 Sep. 02, 2016

Schaffner Bilog Antenna
CBL6111D
22262
Jan. 07, 2016 Jan. 06, 2017
ADT. Turn Table
TT100
0205
NA
NA
ADT. Tower
AT100
0205
NA
NA
Software
Radiated_V7.6.15.9.4
NANA
NA
ADT RF Switches BOX
EMH-0111001
Feb. 15, 2016 Feb. 14, 2017
Pacific RF cable
8D
CABLE-ST2-01 Feb. 15, 2016 Feb. 14, 2017
With 5dB PAD
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations are traceable
to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in Open Site No. 2.
3. The VCCI Site Registration No. R-237.
4. The FCC Site Registration No. 90424.
5. Tested Date: May 24, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 20 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.3

Test Arrangement

a. The EUT was placed on the top of a rotating table 0.8 meters above the ground at an accredited test facility.
The table was rotated 360 degrees to determine the position of the highest radiation.
b. The EUT was set 10 meters away from the interference-receiving antenna, which was mounted on the topof a variable-height antenna tower.
c. The antenna is a broadband antenna, and its height is varied from one meter to four meters above theground to determine the maximum value of the field strength. Both horizontal and vertical polarizations of
the antenna are set to make the measurement.
d. For each suspected emission, the EUT was arranged to its worst case and then the antenna was tuned toheights from 1 meter to 4 meters and the rotatable table was turned from 0 degrees to 360 degrees to findthe maximum reading.
e. The test-receiver system was set to quasi-peak detect function and specified bandwidth with maximum
hold mode when the test frequency is up to 1 GHz.
Note: The resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of test receiver/spectrum analyzer is 120kHz for
quasi-peak detection (QP) at frequency up to 1GHz.

Ant. Tower

EUT&
Support Units

1- 4m
Variable

10m

Turn Table
80cm

Ground Plane
Test Receiver

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 21 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

6.4

Test ResultsFrequency Range

30MHz ~ 1GHz

Tested by

Chinwen Wang

Test Mode

Mode 1

No

Frequency
(MHz)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

41.65
85.10
118.08153.40540.00648.23810.01
972.21999.99Detector Function &Quasi-Peak (QP), 120kHz
Bandwidth
Environmental
25℃, 78%RH
Conditions

Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Horizontal at 10 m
Emission
Antenna
Table
Limit
MarginLevel
HeightAngle(dBuV/m)(dB)(dBuV/m)(m)(Degree)29.70 QP
40.00
-10.304.00 H
315
29.93 QP
40.00
-10.074.00 H21
34.02 QP
40.00
-5.98
4.00 H142
31.09 QP
40.00
-8.91
4.00 H
119
34.30 QP
47.00
-12.702.60 H26
35.18 QP
47.00
-11.822.06 H
140
41.41 QP
47.00
-5.59
1.14 H
343
43.66 QP
47.00
-3.34
1.23 H233
41.99 QP
47.00
-5.01
1.58 H
76

Raw
Value
(dBuV)
11.68
15.63
16.19
13.45
7.62
6.44
9.71
9.37
7.68

Correction
Factor(dB/m)
18.01
14.30
17.83
17.65
26.68
28.74
31.70
34.29
34.31

Remarks:
1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m)
2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB)
– Pre-Amplifier Factor (dB)
3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 22 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Frequency Range

30MHz ~ 1GHz

Tested by

Chinwen Wang

Test Mode

Mode 1

No

Frequency
(MHz)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

42.45
52.44
72.03
125.00148.32
216.40324.40601.00648.13810.01
972.20999.99Detector Function &Quasi-Peak (QP), 120kHz
Bandwidth
Environmental
25℃, 78%RH
Conditions

Antenna Polarity & Test Distance : Vertical at 10 m
Emission
Antenna
Table
Limit
MarginLevel
HeightAngle(dBuV/m)(dB)(dBuV/m)(m)(Degree)33.40 QP
40.00
-6.60
1.00 V58
34.15 QP
40.00
-5.85
1.44 V035.63 QP
40.00
-4.37
1.63 V306
36.35 QP
40.00
-3.65
1.00 V
302
36.96 QP
40.00
-3.04
1.00 V
115
26.84 QP
40.00
-13.161.00 V91
35.43 QP
47.00
-11.571.00 V20
38.47 QP
47.00
-8.53
4.00 V62
38.29 QP
47.00
-8.71
3.71 V352
45.24 QP
47.00
-1.76
2.47 V845.21 QP
47.00
-1.79
1.74 V193
43.32 QP
47.00
-3.68
1.15 V
1

Raw
Value(dBuV)
15.90
20.95
23.05
18.17
19.08
10.79
14.38
10.13
9.54
13.54
10.92
9.01

Correction
Factor(dB/m)
17.49
13.20
12.58
18.18
17.88
16.05
21.05
28.34
28.75
31.70
34.29
34.31

Remarks:
1. Emission Level(dBuV/m) = Raw Value(dBuV) + Correction Factor(dB/m)
2. Correction Factor(dB/m) = Antenna Factor (dB/m) + Cable Factor (dB)
– Pre-Amplifier Factor (dB)
3. The other emission levels were very low against the limit.
4. Margin value = Emission level – Limit value

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 23 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

7
7.1

Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (ESD)
Test Specification

Basic Standard:
Discharge Impedance:
Discharge Voltage:
Number of Discharge:
Discharge Mode:
Discharge Period:
7.2

EN 61000-4-2
330 ohm / 150 pF
Air Discharge: ±2kV, ±4kV, ±8kV (Direct)
Contact Discharge: ±2kV, ±4kV, ±6kV (Direct/Indirect)
Minimum 20 times at each test point
Single Discharge
1-second minimum

Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. Due

KeyTek, ESD Simulator
MZ-15/EC
0504259
Oct. 26, 2015
Oct. 25, 2016
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in ESD Room No. 3.
3. Tested Date: May 31, 2016

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 24 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

7.3

Test Arrangementa.

Electrostatic discharges were applied only to those points and surfaces of the EUT that are accessible
to users during normal operation.

b.

The test was performed with at least ten single discharges on the pre-selected points in the mostsensitive polarity.

c.

The time interval between two successive single discharges was at least 1 second.

d.

The ESD generator was held perpendicularly to the surface to which the discharge was applied andthe return cable was at least 0.2 meters from the EUT.

e.

Contact discharges were applied to the non-insulating coating, with the pointed tip of the generator
penetrating the coating and contacting the conducting substrate.

f.

Air discharges were applied with the round discharge tip of the discharge electrode approaching the
EUT as fast as possible (without causing mechanical damage) to touch the EUT. After each discharge,
the ESD generator was removed from the EUT and re-triggered for a new single discharge. The test
was repeated until all discharges were complete.

g.

At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the Horizontal Coupling
Plane at points on each side of the EUT. The ESD generator was positioned at a distance of 0.1
meters from the EUT with the discharge electrode touching the HCP.

h.

At least ten single discharges (in the most sensitive polarity) were applied to the center of one verticaledge of the Vertical Coupling Plane in sufficiently different positions that the four faces of the EUT
were completely illuminated. The VCP (dimensions 0.5m x 0.5m) was placed vertically to and 0.1
meters from the EUT.
>1m

0.1m
Vertical coupling
plane
0.5mm Isolation Support

ESD
Generator

Nearest
Wall

EUT
470k
x4

Horizontal
coupling plane

80cm

PS
Ground Reference Plane

TABLE-TOP EQUIPMENT
The configuration consisted of a wooden table 0.8 meters high standing on the Ground Reference Plane. The
GRP consisted of a sheet of aluminum at least 0.25mm thick, and 2.5 meters square connected to theprotective grounding system. A Horizontal Coupling Plane (1.6m x 0.8m) was placed on the table andattached to the GRP by means of a cable with 940kΩ total impedance. The equipment under test, wasinstalled in a representative system as described in section 7 of
EN 61000-4-2, and its cables were placed on the HCP and isolated by an insulating support of 0.5mm
thickness. A distance of 1-meter minimum was provided between the EUT and the walls of the laboratory andany other metallic structure.
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 25 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

7.4

Test Results

Input Power230 Vac, 50 Hz

Tested byMichael Cheng

Environmental Conditions

25 °C, 52% RH
1008 mbar

Test mode

Mode 1

Test Results of Direct Application
Discharge
Polarity
Performance
Test Point
Contact Discharge
Air Discharge
Level (kV)(+/-)
Criterion
2, 4, 8+/3, 4, 6, 10, 11
N/A
Note 1
A
2, 4+/1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9Note 1
N/A
A
6+/1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 9Note 2, 3
N/A
B
Description of test points of direct application: Please refer to following page for representative mark only.
Test Results of Indirect Application
Discharge
Polarity
Horizontal
Vertical Coupling
Test Point
Level (kV)(+/-)
Coupling Plane
Plane
2, 4, 6+/Four Sides
Note 1
Note 1
Description of test points of indirect application:

Performance
CriterionA

2. Rear side
1. Front side
3. Right side
4. Left side
Note: 1. The EUT function was correct during the test.
2. There was flicker disturbance on the screen during the test, but self-recoverable after the test.
3. The LAN ping delayed 1~3 seconds during the test, but self- recoverable after the test.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 26 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Description of Test Points

1

5
6

2

3

4

7

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 27 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

8
10

9

11

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 28 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

8
8.1

Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test (RS)Test Specification

Basic Standard:

EN 61000-4-3

80-1000 MHz, 20V/m (1Frequency Range, Field
800-1000 MHz, 20V/m
Strength:
1400-2100 MHz, 10V/m
2100-2500 MHz, 5V/m
Modulation:
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
Frequency Step:
1 % of preceding frequency value
Polarity of Antenna:
Horizontal and Vertical
Antenna Height:
1.5m
Dwell Time:
3 seconds
Note (1: This limit applies to equipment mounted in the passenger compartments, drivers cab or external to
the rolling stock (roof, underframe). For equipment mounted in all other areas a severity level of 10
V/m may be used.
8.2

Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. Due

Agilent
E8257D
MY48050465
Jul. 20, 2016
Jul. 21, 2015
Signal Generator
PRANA
AP32DP280
0811-894
NA
NA
RF Amplifier
TESEQ RF Amplifier
CBA1G-150
T44220NA
NA
AR RF Amplifier
35S4G8AM40326094
NA
NA
AR RF Amplifier
100S1G4M3
0329249
NA
NA
AR Controller
SC1000M3
305910NA
NA
Narda
NBM-550
B-0872Feb. 09, 2016
Feb. 08, 2018
Broadband Field Meter
BOONTON
4232A
10180
Jun. 01, 2015
May 31, 2016
RF Voltage Meter
BOONTON Power Sensor
51013-4E
34870
Jun. 01, 2015
May 31, 2016
BOONTON Power Sensor
51013-4E
34873
Jun. 01, 2015
May 31, 2016
AR
AT60800329465
NA
NA
Log-Periodic Antenna
EMCO
3141
1001
NA
NA
BiconiLog Antenna
AR
AT4002A
306533
NA
NA
High Gain Antenna
AR
AT40100329800
NA
NA
High Gain Horn Antenna
CHANCE MOST
Full Anechoic
Chance Most
RS-002Feb. 05, 2016
Feb. 04, 2017
Chamber (9x5x3m)
Software
RS_V7.6
NA
NA
NA
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in RS Room No.2.
3. Tested Date: May 26, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 29 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

8.3

Test Arrangement

The test procedure was in accordance with EN 61000-4-3.
a.

The testing was performed in a modified semi-anechoic chamber.

b.

The frequency ranges and field strength levels are 80-1000 MHz, 20V/m, 800-1000 MHz, 20V/m,
1400-2100 MHz, 10V/m and 2100-2500 MHz, 5V/m with the signal 80% amplitude modulated with a
1kHz sine wave.

c.

The test was performed with the EUT exposed to both vertically and horizontally polarized fields on eachof the four sides.

EUT

RF Amplifier
RF Generator
andcontrol system

Monitoring
systemTable-top Equipment
The EUT installed in a representative system as described in section 7 of EN 61000-4-3 was placed on a
non-conductive table 0.8 meters in height. The system under test was connected to the power and signal wire
according to relevant installation instructions.
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 30 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

8.4

Test Results

Input Power230 Vac, 50 Hz

Tested byMichael Cheng

Environmental Conditions

26 °C, 55% RH

Test mode

Mode 1Frequency(MHz)

Polarity

Azimuth(°)

80 - 1000

V&H

0, 90, 180, 270

800 - 1000

V&H

0, 90, 180, 270

1400 - 2100

V&H

0, 90, 180, 270

2100 - 2500

V&H

0, 90, 180, 270

Applied Field Strength
Test Distance Performance
Observation(m)
Criterion(V/m)
Modulation
80% AM
20
Note
1.5
A
(1kHz)
80% AM
Note
1.5
A
20
(1kHz)
80% AM
Note
3
A
10(1kHz)
80% AM
Note
3
A
5(1kHz)

Note: The EUT function was correct during the test.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 31 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

9
9.1

Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Immunity Test (EFT)
Test Specification

Basic Standard:
Test Voltage:

Impulse Repetition Frequency:
Impulse Wave Shape:
Burst Duration:
Burst Period:
Test Duration:
9.2

EN 61000-4-4Signal & communication, process measurement & control ports: ±2kV,
Capacitive clamp
Auxiliary a.c. power input ports (rated voltage ≤ 400 Vrms): ±2kV
5kHz
5/50 (Tr/Th) ns
15 ms
300 ms1 min.

Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. Due

Haefely, EFT Generator

PEFT 4010

154954

Apr. 20, 2016

Apr. 19, 2017

Haefely,Capacitive Clamp
IP4A
155173Apr. 20, 2016
Apr. 19, 2017
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in EFT Room.
3. Tested Date: May 27, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 32 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

9.3

Test Arrangementa.

Both positive and negative polarity discharges were applied.

b.

The distance between any coupling devices and the EUT should be 0.5 m for table-top equipment testing,and 1.0 m for floor standing equipment.

c.

The duration time of each test sequential was 1 minute.

d.

The transient/burst waveform was in accordance with EN 61000-4-4, 5/50 ns.

NOTE:(A) location for supply line coupling(B) location for signal lines coupling
For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 33 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

9.4

Test Results

Input Power230 Vac, 50 Hz

Tested byMichael Cheng

Environmental Conditions

26 °C, 65% RH

Test mode

Mode 1

Auxiliary a.c. power input ports (rated voltage ≤ 400 Vrms)
Voltage (kV)2222

Test Point
L1
L2
PE
L1-L2-PE

Polarity (+/-)+/+/+/+/-

Observation
Note
Note
Note
Note

Performance Criterion
B
B
B
B

Observation
Note
Note

Performance Criterion
B
B

Signal & communication, process measurement & control ports
Voltage (kV)22

Test PointSTP LAN x 2
STP POE LAN x 2

Polarity (+/-)+/+/-

Note: There was flicker disturbance on the screen during the test, but self-recoverable after the test.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 34 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

10 Surge Immunity Test
10.1 Test Specification
Basic Standard:
Wave-Shape:

EN 61000-4-5
Auxiliary a.c. power input ports (rated voltage ≤ 400 Vrms):
1.2/50 μs Open Circuit Voltage
8/20 μs Short Circuit Current

Test Voltage:

Line to line: ±0.5kV, ±1kV,Line to ground: ±0.5kV, ±1kV, ±2kV
output impedance of 42 Ω (40 Ω and 2 Ω generator) and a coupling
capacitance of 0,5 μF

AC Phase Angle (degree):0°, 90°, 180°, 270°

Pulse Repetition Rate:
Number of Tests:

1 time / 20 sec.
5 positive and 5 negative at selected points

10.2 Test Instruments

Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. DueTESEQ, Surge Simulator

NSG 3060

1572

May 19, 2016

May 18, 2017

Coupling Decoupling Network
CDN-UTP8028Aug. 20, 2015
Aug. 19, 2016
TESEQ
CDN HSS-2
41009
May 21, 2016
May 20, 2017
Coupling Decoupling NetworkTESEQ
CDN 118-T8
40386
Aug. 31, 2015
Aug. 30, 2016
Coupling Decoupling Networ
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in EMS Room No. 2.
3. Tested Date: May 31, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 35 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

10.3 Test Arrangement
The surge is to be applied to the EUT power supply terminals via the capacitive coupling network.
Decoupling networks are required in order to avoid possible adverse effects on equipment not under test
that may be powered by the same lines, and to provide sufficient decoupling impedance to the surge
wave. The power cord between the EUT and the coupling/decoupling networks shall be 2 meters inlength (or shorter).
For double-insulated products without PE or external earth connections, the test shall be done in asimilar way as for grounded products but without adding any additional external grounded connections. If
there are no other possible connections to earth, line-to-ground tests may be omitted.
Combination
Wave Generator
Coupling &Decoupong
Network

EUT
L ≦ 2mFor the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 36 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

10.4 Test Results
Input Power230 Vac, 50 Hz

Tested by

Bernie Lu

Environmental Conditions

24 °C, 66% RH

Test mode

Mode 1

Auxiliary a.c. power input ports (rated voltage ≤ 400 Vrms)
Voltage (kV)
0.5, 1
0.5, 1, 2
0.5, 1, 2

Test Point
L1-L2
L1-PE
L2-PE

Polarity (+/-)+/+/+/-

Observation
Note
Note
Note

Performance Criterion
A
A
A

Note: The EUT function was correct during the test.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 37 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

11 Immunity to Conducted Disturbances Induced by RF Fields (CS)11.1 Test Specification
Basic Standard:Frequency Range:
Voltage Level:
Modulation:
Frequency Step:
Dwell Time

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

EN 61000-4-6
0.15 MHz - 80 MHz
Auxiliary a.c. power input ports (rated voltage ≤ 400 Vrms), Signal &communication, process measurement & control ports: 10 V
1kHz Sine Wave, 80%, AM Modulation
1 % of preceding frequency value
3 seconds

Page No. 38 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

11.2 Test Instruments
Description & Manufacturer

Model No.

Serial No.

Cal. Date

Cal. DueROHDE & SCHWARZ
SML03
101801
Jan. 07, 2016
Jan. 06, 2017
Signal Generator
Digital Sweep Function
8120
984801NA
NA
Generator
AR Power Amplifier
75A250AM1
306331NANA
FCC Coupling Decoupling
FCC-801-M3-25A
48
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Network
FCC Coupling Decoupling
FCC-801-M3-25A
01022
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Network
FCC Coupling Decoupling
FCC-801-M2-16A
01047
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Network
FISCHER CUSTOMCOMMUNICATIONS
F-203I-23mm
455
NA
NA
EM Injection Clamp
FISCHER CUSTOMCOMMUNICATIONS
F-120-9A
361
NA
NA
Current Injection Clamp
EM TEST Coupling
CDN M1/32A
306508Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Decoupling NetworkTESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN T800
34428
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Network
FCC Coupling Decoupling
FCC-801-T4
02031
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Network
EM TEST Coupling
CDN T2306509Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Decoupling Network
EM TEST Coupling
CDN T4306506
Jun. 23, 2015
Jun. 22, 2016
Decoupling Network
R&S Power Sensor
NRV-Z5837878/039
Oct. 26, 2015
Oct. 25, 2016
R&S Power Meter
NRVD
837794/040
Oct. 27, 2015
Oct. 26, 2016
TESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN M232
37702
Aug. 18, 2015
Aug. 17, 2016
NetworkTESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN M332
41258
Sep. 22, 2015
Sep. 21, 2016
NetworkTESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN M332
41256
Aug. 20, 2015
Aug. 19, 2016
NetworkTESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN T400A
28569
Aug. 17, 2015
Aug. 16, 2016
NetworkTESEQ Coupling Decoupling
CDN T8-10
40376
Aug. 17, 2015
Aug. 16, 2016
Network
Software
CS_V7.4.2
NA
NA
NA
Notes: 1. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the calibrations aretraceable to NML/ROC and NIST/USA.
2. The test was performed in CS Room No. 1.
3. Tested Date: May 27, 2016.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 39 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

11.3 Test Arrangementa.

The EUT shall be tested within its intended operating and climatic conditions.

b.

An artificial hand was placed on the hand-held accessory and connected to the ground reference plane.

c.

One of the CDNs not used for injection was terminated with 50 ohm, providing only one return path. Allother CDNs were coupled as decoupling networks.

d.

The frequency range is swept from 150 kHz to 80 MHz, using the signal level established during thesetting process and with a disturbance signal of 80 % amplitude. The signal is modulated with a 1 kHzsine wave, pausing to adjust the RF signal level or the switch coupling devices as necessary. Where thefrequency is swept incrementally, the step size shall not exceed 1 % of the preceding frequency value.

e.

Attempts should be made to fully exercise the EUT during testing, and to fully interrogate all exercise
modes selected for susceptibility.

Note:

1.The EUT clearance from any metallic obstacles shall be at least 0,5 m.
2. Interconnecting cables (≦1 m) belonging to the EUT shall remain on the insulating support.
3. The equipment to be tested is placed on an insulating support of 0.1 meters height above a groundreference plane. All relevant cables shall be provided with the appropriate coupling and decoupling
devices at a distance between 0.1 meters and 0.3 meters from the projected geometry of the EUT
on the ground reference plane.

For the actual test configuration, please refer to the related item – Photographs of the Test Configuration.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 40 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

11.4 Test Results
Input Power230 Vac, 50 Hz

Tested byMichael Cheng

Environmental Conditions

26 °C, 65% RH

Test mode

Mode 1Frequency Level(MHz)(V rms)0.15 – 80
100.15 – 80

100.15 – 80

100.15 – 80

100.15 – 80

10

Tested LineAC Power
STP LAN(Port 1)
STP LAN(Port 2)
STP PoE LAN(Port 3)
STP PoE LAN(Port 18)

Injection
MethodCDN-M3ReturnPath
CDN-M3Observation

RemarkNote-

Performance
CriterionA

EM-Clamp

CDN-M3

Note-

A

EM-Clamp

CDN-M3

Note-

A

EM-Clamp

CDN-M3

Note-

A

EM-Clamp

CDN-M3Note-

A

Note: The EUT function was correct during the test.

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 41 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12 Pictures of Test Arrangements
12.1 Conducted Disturbance at Auxiliary a.c. or d.c. power ports

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 42 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.2 Radiated Disturbance up to 1 GHz

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 43 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.3 Electrostatic Discharge Immunity Test (ESD)

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 44 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.4 Radio-frequency Electromagnetic Field Immunity Test (RS)

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 45 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.5 Fast Transients (EFT)
Mains ports

STP LAN

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 46 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

POE LAN

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 47 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.6 Surge
Mains ports

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 48 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

12.7 Radio-frequency common mode (CS)
Mains ports

STP LAN

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 49 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

POE LAN

Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 50 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2

Appendix – Information on the Testing Laboratories
We, Bureau Veritas Consumer Products Services (H.K.) Ltd., Taoyuan Branch, were founded in 1988 toprovide our best service in EMC, Radio, Telecom and Safety consultation. Our laboratories are accredited andapproved according to ISO/IEC 17025.
If you have any comments, please feel free to contact us at the following:
Linko EMC/RF Lab
Tel: 886-2-26052180
Fax: 886-2-26051924

Hsin Chu EMC/RF Lab/Telecom Lab
Tel: 886-3-6668565
Fax: 886-3-6668323

Hwa Ya EMC/RF/Safety
Tel: 886-3-3183232
Fax: 886-3-3270892
Email: service.adt@tw.bureauveritas.com
Web Site: www.bureauveritas-adt.com
The address and road map of all our labs can be found in our web site also.

--- END ---Report No.: CE160519D09-1

Page No. 51 / 51

Report Format Version: 6.1.2