FEBRUARY 2023

CIVIL SOCIETY JOINT POSITION:

Oil and Gas Restrictions
under the OECD
Arrangement on OfficiallySupported Export Credits

Purpose - This document outlines how the OECD Arrangement on
Officially Supported Export Credits can align with the Paris
Agreement warming target of 1.5°C by placing restrictions on export
support for oil and gas projects and associated infrastructure. These
restrictions build on the existing prohibition on coal-fired power,
which came into effect 1 January 2022 and was preceded by the coalfired power sector understanding (CFSU). Participant countries underthe Arrangement are encouraged to utilize this document to develop
comprehensive fossil fuel restrictions. This briefing has been written
by a coalition of civil society organizations from both global southand global north countries working on climate governance of exportcredit agencies (ECAs). For more information, contact Nina Pušić of
Oil Change International (nina@priceofoil.org) or Kate DeAngelis of
Friends of the Earth US (kdeangelis@foe.org).

i. Context:
I n 2 0 1 5 , t h e P a r i s A g r e e m e n t c o m m i t t e d g o v e r n m e n t s t o l i m i t g l o b a l w a r m i n g t o 1 . 5°C b y t h e
end of the century in order to avert and minimize catastrophic anthropogenic climate change.
Article 2.1(c) of the Agreement also obliges countries to “make finance flows consistent with ap a t h w a y t o w a r d s l o w g r e e n h o u s e g a s e m i s s i o n s a n d c l i m a t e - r e s i l i e n t d e v e l o p m e n t ” 1. W i t h t h e
e a r t h ’ s g l o b a l s u r f a c e t e m p e r a t u r e h a v i n g a l r e a d y w a r m e d b y 1 . 2°C i n 2 0 2 1 f r o m p r e i n d u s t r i a lt e m p e r a t u r e s 2, u r g e n t a c t i o n i s n e e d e d t o k e e p 1 . 5°C w i t h i n r e a c h . A p h a s e - o u t o f o i l , g a s a n d
c o a l , t h e s o u r c e o f 8 6 % o f g r e e n h o u s e g a s e m i s s i o n s i n t h e l a s t 1 0 y e a r s 3, i s p a r a m o u n t . I n i t s
Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario, which maintains a 50% chance of limiting global
warming to 1.5°C, the IEA concludes that there is no room for investments in new coal, oil, org a s s u p p l y o r l i q u e f i e d n a t u r a l g a s ( L N G ) i n f r a s t r u c t u r e w i t h o u t s t r a n d e d e x t r a c t i o n a s s e t s 4.
Moreover, the IPCC’s latest climate mitigation report shows that existing fossil fuelinfrastructure, if operated as planned, would already push the world far beyond 1.5°C 5 . Thismeans that some of the oil and gas fields and coal mines, as well as fossil fuel-burning power
plants, that are already built and in production will need to be decommissioned and retirede a r l y t o k e e p t h e 1 . 5 ° C w a r m i n g t a r g e t o f t h e P a r i s A g r e e m e n t w i t h i n r e a c h 6, w h i c h i n c l u d e s
4 0 % o f a l r e a d y - d e v e l o p e d f o s s i l f u e l r e s e r v e s t h a t w i l l n e e d t o s t a y i n t h e g r o u n d 7. T h e r e f o r e ,there is no room for any international public support for any new oil and gas projects, orthe expansion of coal, oil, and gas exploration, production, transportation, storage,r e f i n i n g , p o w e r g e n e r a t i o n , a n d a s s o c i a t e d i n f r a s t r u c t u r e.
Export credit agencies (ECAs) play a pivotal role in de-risking investment and shaping the
global energy landscape. Yet, most recent data shows that between 2019 and 2021, G20 ECAs
provided $34.7 USD billion annually to fossil fuels, yet only $4.7 billion USD for renewables . Due
8to the Arrangement’s development of the Sector Understanding on Export Credits for CoalFired Electricity Generation Projects (CFSU) in 2015, followed by the prohibition of coal-fired
power under Article 6 of the Arrangement in October 2021, export finance for coal has dropped
1 Paris Agreement (2015) Article 2.1(c). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at:https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
2 IPCC (2021) “Understanding Global Warming of 1.5C” Section A. IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C
https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/
3 United Nations (2022) “Renewable energy: Powering a Safer Future” Available at: https://bit.ly/3drNgCf
4 IEA (2021) “Net Zero by 2050 Report” Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
5 IPCC, 2021
6 Tong et al. (2019). Committed emissions from existing energy infrastructure jeopardize the 1.5 °C climate target. Nature, 572(7769), 373–377. Available
at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1364-3.
7 Trout et al (2022) “Existing fossil fuel extraction would warm the world beyond 1.5 °C” Environ. Res. Lett. https://bit.ly/3SWRAbD
8 Oil Change International and Friends of the Earth US (2022) “At a Crossroads: Assessing G20 and MDB international energy finance ahead of stop
funding fossils pledge deadline” Available at: https://priceofoil.org/2022/11/01/g20-at-a-crossroads/

01significantly. Coal finance dropped by $4 billion USD in 2021 compared to the averagesb e t w e e n 2 0 1 3 a n d 2 0 1 7 9, b e f o r e t h e O E C D A r r a n g e m e n t C o a l - F i r e d P o w e r S e c t o r u n d e r s t a n d i n gcame into force. As a result, 92% of G20 ECA fossil fuel support between 2019 - 2021 went to oiland gas related projects. To ensure the guidelines of the Arrangement are compatible with
1 . 5°C , i t i s c r i t i c a l t o b u i l d o n t h e p r o g r e s s w i t n e s s e d u n d e r t h e p r o h i b i t i o n o f c o a l - f i r e d p o w e r
and secure oil and gas export support restrictions.
In 2021, 39 governments and institutions signed the Glasgow Statement on International Public
S u p p o r t f o r t h e C l e a n E n e r g y T r a n s i t i o n 1 0. T h i s s t a t e m e n t c o m m i t s s i g n a t o r i e s t o e n d i n g n e w
direct public support for the international unabated fossil fuel energy sector, including oil andgas, by the end of 2022, and “driving multilateral negotiations in international bodies, inp a r t i c u l a r i n t h e O E C D, t o r e v i e w , u p d a t e a n d s t r e n g t h e n t h e i r g o v e r n a n c e f r a m e w o r k s t o a l i g n
with the Paris Agreement goals” 11. Therefore, ensuring the implementation of both the Glasgow
Statement explicitly requires enacting restrictions on oil and gas export finance under theOECD Arrangement of Officially Supported Export Credits.

II. Oil and gas export credit restrictions under the OECD
Arrangement
With 52% of the OECD members signed onto the Glasgow Statement and the subsequent nearidentical G7 commitment to end international public finance for fossil fuels by the end of
2 0 2 212 , t h e r e i s a n o p p o r t u n i t y f o r t h e s e m e m b e r s t o e n s u r e o t h e r O E C D m e m b e r s f o l l o w s u i t .
Fossil fuel restrictions in the OECD are in signatories’ and the G7 members’ interest as they will
h e l p c r e a t e a l e v e l - p l a y i n g f i e l d , w h i c h i s t h e m a i n p u r p o s e o f t h e O E C D 13. F o r o i l a n d g a s
e x p o r t f i n a n c e r e s t r i c t i o n s a t t h e O E C D l e v e l t o b e a l i g n e d w i t h 1 . 5°C o f w a r m i n g , t h e s e
restrictions must:
Target upstream (exploration, drilling, and extraction), midstream (storage, processing,and transportation) and downstream (oil or gas-fired power) oil and gas finance,e n s u r i n g n o n e w f o s s i l f u e l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e s u p p o r t u s i n g o f f i c i a l e x p o r t c r e d i t s;
P r o h i b i t e x p o r t c r e d i t f i n a n c i n g f o r a l l a s s o c i a t e d o i l a n d g a s i n f r a s t r u c t u r e;
In case of any reference to “unabated” fossil fuels, clearly define the term to avoid
misuse or continued support for the entire oil and gas supply chain and powerg e n e r a t i o n 1 4.

The OECD Arrangement can build on the momentum of its prohibition on coal-fired
15
power and align with 1.5°C, by adopting a ‘prohibition model’ approach to oil and gas
restrictions:
1. follows the Coal-Fired Power Prohibition approach enacted 1 Jan. 2022;
2. requires that Participants shall not provide officially supported export credits ortied aid for oil and gas;
3. extends that requirement from ‘plants’ to ‘infrastructure’, thereby encompassing
up-, mid-, and downstream activities as well as associated infrastructure.

9 Ibid10 Glasgow Statement on the International Support for Clean Energy Transition [Glasgow Statement] (2021) https://bit.ly/3DGx6PY
11 Ibid, Paragraph 3
12 In May 2022, G7 climate, energy and environment ministers issued a communique committing to end public finance for fossil fuels by the end of
this year. Available here: https://bit.ly/3S921Ji
13 OECD (2022) “Arrangement on Officially Supported Export Credits” Available at: https://bit.ly/3f57Rwp
14 The definition of “unabated” should include scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions.
15 This model was recommended by legal expert on export credits, Professor Navraj Singh Ghaleigh of the University of Edinburgh

02III. Exemptions
Any exemptions to these restrictions must not allow support for
any fossil fuel long-term infrastructure projects, such as gas-fired
power plants, oil refineries, pipelines, or export terminals, etc.
These types of infrastructure are incompatible with 1.5°C-aligned
c l i m a t e g o a l s a n d t a k e y e a r s t o b u i l d 1 6; t h e r e f o r e , t h e y c a n n o tdeliver on short-term emergency needs. Gas-fired power
specifically has been proven to be incompatible with the IPCC’s
1.5°C scenario, due to methane leakages from gas infrastructure
which undermine claims of environmental benefits over otherfossil fuels17.
It is acknowledged that existing ECAs with fossil fuel restriction
policies, including UK Export Finance, and Sweden’s EKN,
currently have exemptions related to fossil fuels, when it isneeded to increase access to modern energy services, and in
i n s t a n c e s o f h u m a n i t a r i a n c r i s e s 1 8. T h e s e n a r r o w e x c e p t i o n s
include stand-alone diesel or gas generators in emergency
r e s p o n s e s e t t i n g s1 9 , w h e r e r e n e w a b l e s a r e n o t v i a b l e , o r i n t h e c a s ewhere liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is the only option available
for cooking, lighting, or heating. These exemptions should never
be used without the agency first publicly publishing a robust
alternatives assessment that evaluates the potential for renewableenergy support instead, in order to ensure a just transition to
renewable energy is not negatively impacted. In this document,
signatories note that these exceptions may be superfluous, as
ECAs are not the best suited financial mechanisms to respond tohumanitarian crises nor energy access needs. Grants through otherpublic financial means, such as Development Finance Institutions(DFIs) or Aid agencies, are generally better suited to support
instances where finance for short-term emergency energy accessis needed. Key energy research and energy landscape analysis has
demonstrated that fossil fuels are no longer the cheapest nor
m o s t a c c e s s i b l e w a y t o p r o v i d e e n e r g y a c c e s s 2 0.

IV. General principles for negotiating“climate-friendly” incentives
Acknowledging that ECAs do not have the most suitable mandate
to support local sustainable development or energy access, OECD
Arrangement Participants must ensure that any climate-related
incentives that are negotiated help facilitate a just transition to

16 Kemfert et al (2022) “The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk”
https://go.nature.com/3eeOMYR
17 Greg Muttitt et al. (2021) “Step off the Gas: International public finance, natural gas, and clean
alternatives in the Global South” International Institute for Sustainable Development
https://bit.ly/3VrdHJc
18 Examples of this model for a humanitarian exemption can already be found in: UKEF (2021), “Aligning
UK international support for the clean energy transition”. Section 4a and 4b: Page 8. Available at:https://bit.ly/3UruDio; EKN (2022) “Policy and Guidelines: Sustainability Policy” Available at:https://bit.ly/3gfIVDa
19 “Emergency response settings” should strictly include: countries with active warfare, and short term(less than 6 months) community recovery from rapid-onset extreme weather disaster and notinterpreted under other conditions.
20 Sustainable Energy for All, & Climate Policy Initiative (2020) Energizing finance: Understanding thelandscape https://bit.ly/3rUfqZU; and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, 2021 Levelized Cost Of Electricity
report, Bloomberg Terminal;03

r e n e w a b l e e n e r g y 2 1. T h e r e f o r e , i n c e n t i v e s m u s t e x p l i c i t l y e x c l u d e a n y k i n d o f f o s s i l f u e l - r e l a t e dinfrastructure, such as fossil gas, ammonia and hydrogen produced from fossils, and carbon
c a p t u r e a n d s t o r a g e ( C C S ) , n u c l e a r , a n d l a r g e h y d r o e l e c t r i c p o w e r p l a n t s2 2 , f r o m b e n e f i t i n g f r o m
f i n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s 2 3. I n s t e a d , i f a d d i t i o n a l i n c e n t i v e s a r e n e g o t i a t e d u n d e r t h e r e v i s e d C l i m a t e
Change Sector Understanding, they must be clearly defined as renewable energy projects andassociated infrastructure, such as wind, solar, small-scale hydro, and emerging renewable
technologies such as tidal power.
Given the problematic history of ECA finance, and repeated instances of negative impacts ofl o c a l c o m m u n i t i e s o n p r o j e c t s i t e s 2 4, E C A s a r e n o t w e l l s u i t e d t o e n g a g e i n l a r g e - s c a l e e n e r g y
projects. However, if large-scale renewable energy projects are undertaken, a just transition
approach must be utilized to ensure proper due diligence for all projects, respect for the rights
of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in line with Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC)
p r i n c i p l e s 2 5, a n d i n c r e a s e a f f o r d a b l e e n e r g y a c c e s s , e n e r g y o w n e r s h i p , a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a t i o n o f t h elocation communities, including via job creation. It is also recommended that ECAs do notsupport projects concerning the mining or transportation of critical minerals for the energy
t r a n s i t i o n . C o n s i d e r i n g n u m e r o u s h i s t o r i c e x a m p l e s o f E C A f i n a n c e 2 6, o t h e r p u b l i c f i n a n c i a lactors who have a better track record of respecting human rights, upholding Indigenous
Peoples' rights to self-determination, and ensuring strong environmental and socials a f e g u a r d s2 7 , a r e b e t t e r p l a c e d t o e n g a g e w i t h p r o j e c t s r e l a t e d t o c r i t i c a l m i n e r a l s . T h e s e
p r i n c i p l e s a r e t o e n s u r e p r o b l e m a t i c p r a c t i c e s , s u c h a s t h e c r e a t i o n o f “ s a c r i f i c e z o n e s ” 2 8, a r e n o tperpetuated in the revised Climate Change Sector Understanding under the OECD
Arrangement.
21 More information on Just Transition Principles can be found in: Climate Justice Alliance, “Just Transition Principles” Available at:https://bit.ly/3ey152s; Also cited in Paris Agreement (2015) preamble, page 2 “Taking into account the imperatives of a just transition of the workforce
and the creation of decent work and quality jobs in accordance with nationally defined development priorities”.
22 Large hydroelectric power projects in this context are defined as those larger than 30 megawatts (MW) of generation capacity.
23 Incentives under the OECD Arrangement must not follow recent problematic policy classifications, such as the European Union’s Green Taxonomy,
which has failed to follow science-based metrics to align with 1.5°C. See more in: Anlar, Seden. (2022) “EU Taxonomy: The dirty politics ofgreenwashing energy” Green European Journal. Available at: https://bit.ly/3Lz9UoD. Currently being legally challenged by 4 environmental groups who
argue that this classification is unlawful as it clashes with a number of key EU laws, in particular the legal basis of the Taxonomy itself.
https://bit.ly/3SYdYBt
24 For example, many export credit agencies are supporting the liquefied natural gas development in northern Mozambique, but ECAs have failed to
conduct proper due diligence and ensure that meaningful community consultation has taken place. NRC, ‘The Netherlands ignored warnings aboutkidnappings and beheadings in Mozambique during gas project’, 1 November 2021,https://bit.ly/3eGEaSw; Paul Burkhardt and Matthew Hill, U.S.
Export-Import Bank Warned on Mozambique Risks Before $4.7 Billion Loan, Bloomberg, 6 April 2021,https://bloom.bg/3VFQ67D
25 See more information on FPIC at: FAO (2016) “Free Prior and Informed Consent: An Indigenous Peoples’ Right and a good practice for local
communities” https://bit.ly/3fIKWY226 For example, the U.S. Export-Import Bank supported the Sasan coal plant and mine where tens of people have died, including children. Office of
the Inspector General, Export-Import Bank of the United States, Report on the Project Financing of Sasan Power Limited (28 September 2015):
https://bit.ly/3CM2w5x; Darrell Proctor, At Least Two Dead in Coal Ash Breach in India, Power, 12 April 2020, https://bit.ly/3s4xelr ; Letter to Jennifer
Fain, Acting Inspector General, Export-Import Bank of the United States re Sasan deaths, 1 May 2020, https://bit.ly/3seE8UZ. Examples from
Mozambique include the Rovuma LNG project, Coral South FLNG project, and more, featured in: Anneke Wensing “Fueling the Crisis in Mozambique”
Milieudefensie. May 2022. Page 13. https://bit.ly/3VMGhow. Examples from Ghana (Offshore Cape Three Points Integrated Oil and Gas Exploration(OCTP), Nigeria (‘Train 7’ project) and East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) can be found in: Both Ends “A Just Energy Transition for Africa?
Mapping the impacts of ECAs in the energy sector” November 2020. Page 13-15. https://bit.ly/3yXMjZM
27 This includes following robust standards such as the “Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance” see more: Earthworks “The Initiative for
Responsible Mining Assurance” IRMA is a multi-sector initiative that offers independent, third-party auditing and transparency at mine sites using its
400+ page standard. https://bit.ly/3MixOFi
28 Sacrifice Zones in the context of green energy is further explored in: Zografos and Robbin (2020) “Sacrifice Zones” in the Green Energy Economy:
Toward an Environmental Justice Framework” https://bit.ly/3SMSyY904

V. Recommendations for OECD Participants to align export
finance with 1.5°C:

Sign on to the Glasgow Statement on the International Support for Clean Energy Transition,i f t h e y h a v e n o t y e t d o n e s o2 9 ;Implement their Glasgow Statement obligations as soon as possible, and at maximum within
one year of signing;
Showcase ambitious leadership in other critical fora, such as the G7 and Export Finance for
Future (E3F) initiative, utilizing diplomatic leverage to encourage other countries to follow
suit;
Build support for robust oil and gas restrictions, as outlined above, at the OECD Civil Society
Stakeholder meetings and during closed Participant meetings;
Institute enforcement measures that should apply for both existing and planned oil, gas andcoal projects to hold ECAs accountable to human rights, and environmental and social
safeguards;
Table a proposal on restricting oil and gas in accordance with the above criteria, or alignw i t h o t h e r l e a d i n g P a r t i c i p a n t s t o s u p p o r t s u c h a p r o p o s a l n o l a t e r t h a n M a r c h 2 0 2 3.

29 Glasgow Statement on the International Support for Clean Energy Transition [Glasgow Statement] (2021) https://bit.ly/3DGx6PY05

This Joint Position has been endorsed by the following Civil
Society Organizations:
350 Africa (International)

Friends of the Earth Norway(Naturvernforbundet)

350 Aotearoa (New Zealand)
350.org (Australia)
AbibiNsroma Foundation (Ghana)

Fundación Ambiente y Recursos
Naturales (Argentina)
GegenStroemung - CounterCurrent(Germany)

ActionAid (Denmark)Global Justice Now (United Kingdom)
Agrosilvicultores de Hidalgo Sociedad
Cooperativa (Mexico)
Alerte Congolaise pour l’Environnement et
les Droits de l’Homme (Democratic
Republic of Congo)
Alliance for Empowering Rural
Communities (Ghana)

Greenpeace (International)
Grupo de Financiamiento Climático para
Latinoamérica y el Caribe (International)
Japan Center for a Sustainable
Environment and Society (Japan)

AnsvarligFremtid (Denmark)Jubilee Australia Research Centre(Australia)

Bank Information Center (United States)

Just Finance International

BankTrack (International)

Les Amis de la Terre France - Friends ofthe Earth (France)

Both ENDS (Netherlands)
Lift Humanity Foundation (Nigeria)
CEE Bankwatch Network (International)
Center for International Environmental
Law (International)

Maan ystävät / Friends of the Earth(Finland)Christian Aid (United Kingdom)

Magyar Természetvédők Szövetsége Friends of the Earth (Hungary)

Climate Action Network (Australia)

Mekong Watch (Japan)

DREx (Ecuador)

Milieudefensie - Friends of the Earth(Netherlands)

Derecho Ambiente y Recursos Naturales(Perú)
E3G - Third Generation
Environmentalism (International)
Eliana Arias Portillo (Columbia)
Environment Governance Institute(Uganda)Mindful Money (New Zealand)
Moderna Sustenable (Chile)
Nature and Youth/Young
Friends of the Earth (Norway)
Oil Change International
Oxum (Columbia)

Environmental Defence Canada (Canada)
Friends of the Earth US (United States)
Friends of the Earth England, Wales andNorthern Ireland (United Kingdom)

Proyecto de Gobernanza sobre Cambio
Climático (Costa Rica)
ReCommon (Italy)
Recourse (United Kingdom)06

Sierra Club (United States)
Solutions For Our Climate - SFOC
(Republic of Korea)

Brighton & Hove Friends of the Earth(United Kingdom)
Canadian Health Assoc. for Sustainability& Equity (Canada)

Swedwatch (Sweden)
Care For Environment (Cameroon)
Tearfund (United Kingdom)
Urgewald (Germany)

Center for Energy and Environment
Development (Ghana)World Economy, Ecology & Development WEED (Germany)

Centre for Citizens Conserving
Environment & Management (Uganda)

Youth For Green Communities (Uganda)

Chair of LAMB Health (United Kingdom)

350 Ghana Reducing our Carbon (Ghana)350.org América Latina

CHANGE, Coeur Humanitaire en Action
Novatrice pour la réGénération Effective,(D.R. Congo)

Above Ground (Canada)

Citizen Participation Forum (Kenya)

African patterns child poverty andenvironment (Uganda)

Citizens Climate International (Nigeria)
Citizens' Climate Lobby (Canada)

Agenda Marina Costera (Costa Rica)
Clean Air Action Group (Hungary)
AITEC (France)
Alliance for Empowering Rural
Communities (Ghana)
Alliance Sud (Switzerland)

Climate Action Leicester andLeicestershire (United Kingdom)
Coordination Office of the Austrian
Bishops' Conference for International
Development and Mission - KOO (Austria)

Alofa Tuvalu (France)
Climate Justice Saskatoon (Canada)
American Friends Service Committee(International)

Comité ambiental de Piedras Tolima(Colombia)

AnsvarligFremtid (Denmark)Appui aux Initiatives Communautaires deConservation de l'Environnement et deDéveloppement Durable, AICED (D.R.
Congo)

Comité de Defensa de la Bahía de Ocoa
(Dominican Republic)
Conectas Direitos Humanos (Brasil)
Cordaid (Netherlands)

Arab Watch Coalition (International)
Asociación Interamericana para la Defensadel Ambiente, AIDA (Latin America)
Association de lutte contre ladéforestation (Mali)

Derbyshire Pensioners Action Group(United Kingdom)
Derecho Ambiente y Recursos Naturales(Perú)Divest Lothian (United Kingdom)

ATTAC (France)
Divest Tyne and Wear (United Kingdom)
Australian Conservation Foundation(Australia)
Bangladesh Environmental Layers
Association (Bangladesh)
Barranquilla+20 (Colombia)

07

Divest WMPF (United Kingdom)
Earthworks (United States)
Éghajlatvédelmi Szövetség / Hungarian
Climate Alliance (Hungary)

EKOenergy ecolabel (International)

MVO Nederland (The Netherlands)

Electra Energy Cooperative (Greece)

New forest friends of the earth (United
Kingdom)

Endorois Indigenous Women
Empowerment Network (Kenya)

OECD Watch

Faith for the Climate (United Kingdom)

Oil Watch (Uganda)

Foundation for Animal Welfare and Nature
Protection (Hungary)

ONG FIMA (Chile)
Operation Noah (United Kingdom)

Fenntarthatóság Felé Egyesület (Hungary)
Pauchamama (Chile)
FIDEP Foundation (Ghana)
PBFCC (Bolivia)
Fossil Free Merseyside (United Kingdom)
Fossil Free Shropshire (United Kingdom)
Friends of the Earth (Australia)

Peterborough in Transition (United
Kingdom)
Plataforma Boliviana Frente al Cambio
Climático (Bolivia)

Friends of the Earth (Georgia)
Friends of the Earth (Ireland)
Fund Our Future (South Africa)

Presienta Fundación Pachamama(Ecuador)
Project on Organizing, Development,
Education, and Research (Mexico)

Fundación Cerro Verde (Ecuador)
Protect Our Winters UK (United Kingdom)
Fundación Chile Sustentable (Chile)
Public Defender’s Office Service (Brazil)
Fundación Manfred MaxNeef (Chile)
Global Justice Bradford (United Kingdom)

RAPEN, Réseau des associations pour laprotection de l'environnement et lanature, (Sénégal)Global Witness (International)
RECODEF (Sénégal)GreenNet (United Kingdom)
Recourse (International)
Hivos (International)
Réseau Action Climat (France)
Indigenous Environmental Network(United States)
Instituto de Abogados para la Proteccióndel Medio Ambiente, INSAPROMA(Dominican Republic)

Réseau des associations pour laprotection de l'environnement et lanature RAPEN (Sénégal)Sahabat Alam Malaysia - Friends of the
Earth (Malaysia)

Instituto Talanoa (Brasil)
Jamaa Resource Initiatives (Kenya)
Közép-Magyarországi Zöld Kör (Hungary)Society for Threatened Peoples(Switzerland)
Solidarité pour la Protection des Droits
de l'Enfants (D.R. Congo)

Latinoamérica Sustentable (Ecuador)
Leave it in the Ground Initiative (Germany)
Lekeh Development Foundation (Nigeria)

South Yorkshire Fossil Free! (United
Kingdom)
Strategic Response on Environmental
Conservation (Uganda)

Les Amis de la Terre (Togo)
Sula Batsu Cooperativa (Costa Rica)08

Sustainable Development Institute(Liberia)
Sustainable Development Institute(Liberia)
The Climate Collective (United Kingdom)
Tottenham Friends of the Earth (United
Kingdom)
Union pour le Développement etCoopération (Guinea)
University of Kassel (Germany)
University of Witten/Herdecke (Germany)
WALHI South Sulawesi (Indonesia)
WECF International - Women Engage for a
Common Future (Netherlands)
Women for Green Economy Movement(Uganda)Women for Green Economy Movement(Uganda)Worthing Climate Action Network (United
Kingdom)
WWF European Policy Office (Belgium)
Zero Carbon Shropshire (United Kingdom)09