グローバルでの意見募集案件(2016 年 8 月 26 日)
1) インターネットアクセスの環境整備に関するオープンコンサルテーション
a. コ メ ン ト 募 集の概要
b. コ メ ン ト 募 集の内容

募集者：International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
締め切り：2016 年 9 月 11 日
【テーマ：インターネットアクセスの環境整備】
1. インターネットコネクティビティを促進させるための環境整
備には何が必要か。
2. インターネットを手頃な価格にするための環境整備には何が必要か。
3. インターネットアクセスの質を向上させるための環境整備には何が必要か。
4. インターネット利用における信頼性とセキュリティを醸成させるための環境整備には何が必要か。
5. 環境整備における政府の役割とは何か。

c. コメント方法

ITU のコメント募集サイトへの意見提出(英語)https://www.itu.int/en/council/cwg-internet/Pages/consultationfeb2016.aspx

d. 参考情報「ITU 理事会作業部会でのオープンコンサルテーションに関する依頼 (IGCJ14)」
http://igcj.jp/meetings/2016/0804/igcj14-3-tsuchiya.pdf

2) 今後 10 年に向けた IGF の改善に関する意見募集
a. コ メ ン ト 募 集の概要
b. コ メ ン ト 募 集の内容

募集者：Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
締め切り：指定なし(9 月末で締め切ることも検討中)
2016 年 7 月、ニューヨークで開催された今後 10 年の IGF の改善に向けた議論を行った会議報告書への意見募集。5 つの大項目(合計 8 項目)の改善検討のうち、National Regional IGF(NRI)に関する検討(参考資料 1 参照)も実施。

c. コメント方法

IGF のコメント募集サイトへの意見提出(英語)http://www.intgovforum.org/review/igf-retreat-proceedings-ide
as-and-suggestions/d. 参考情報「Retreat on Advancing the 10-Year Mandate of the Internet
Governance Forum」
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/igf-retreat
1

「IGF RETREAT PROCEEDINGS」
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/2016-06-23-15-15-52/igf-retrea
t-proceedings
3) IGF Connecting the Next Billion Online Phase II への意見募集
a. コ メ ン ト 募 集の概要

募集者：Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
締め切り：2006 年 8 月 31 日、National Regional IGF(NRI)は期限なし

b. コ メ ン ト 募 集の内容

グローバル IGF において共通のテーマのもと、National RegionalIGF(NRI)からも積極的に意見を求める方法として 2015 年から継続している取り組み。NRI に限らず誰でも意見提出が可能。
「Connecting the Next Billion Online(次の 10 億のオンラインへの接続)」のテーマに対してオンラインで提出される意見を文書にとりまとめ、IGF 会議のメインセッションとしても議論を実施。
地域事情や持続可能な開発目標(SDG)との関連性に重点を置いた
9 つの質問(参考資料 2 参照)への回答が求められている。
質問は日本の状況に該当しないものが多いが、IPv6 や IoT 等の切り口から回答するアプローチも考えられる。

c. コメント方法

電子メールでの意見提出(英語)Anri van der Spuy(avanderspuy@unog.ch) 及びBrian Gutterman(gutterman@un.org)

d. 参考情報「Policy Options for Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion- Phase II」
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/policy-options-for-connection-t
he-next-billion#contribute4) IGF2016 Best Practices Forum on Cybersecurity からの意見募集
a. コ メ ン ト 募 集の概要

募集者：Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
締め切り：2006 年 8 月 19 日、National Regional IGF(NRI)は期限なし

b. コ メ ン ト 募 集の内容

IGF2016 における Best Practices Forum(BPF)の 5 つのテーマのうちのひとつ。Best Practices Forum はオンラインとテレカンフ
ァレンスにて、特定のテーマに対して IGF 会議前に議論し、当該テーマに関する最適な運用の文書化を目指す。誰でも参加が可能。
2

本 BPF はサイバーセキュリティにおける関係者の連携強化に重点を置き、以下の質問への意見を募集。

c. コメント方法【意見募集内容】
 What are the typical roles and responsibilities of your/eachof the stakeholder groups in making the internet a secureand safe place for people to socialize and conduct business?
 What are some of the typical communication mechanisms
between stakeholder groups to discuss cyber security
related concerns?
 How can cybersecurity cooperation and collaboration beenhanced particularly in developing and least developedcountries?
 What are some common problem areas that stakeholders
encounter when trying to enhance cooperation andcollaboration?
 What are some notable existing best practices andexamples of successful collaboration and cooperation
amongst stakeholders and specific actors that have helped
improve cybersecurity?
 What are some examples of best practices in ‘Cybersecurity
Situational
Awareness’
wheredifferentorganizations have worked together, specifically with law
enforcement agencies and other specialists?
 What are other related or different topics that yourorganization would like this BPF to address moving
forward, both in 2016 and beyond?
IGF2016 Best Practices Forum on Cybersecurity のメーリング
リストへの投稿(英語)
http://www.intgovforum.org/mailman/listinfo/bp_cybersec_2016_intgovforum.org

d. 参考情報「BPF Cybersecurity」
http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/best-practice-forums/bpf-cybersecurity

5) Asia Pacific Regional Internet Governance Forum(APrIGF)
Synthesis Document ver.2 への意見募集
a. コ メ ン ト 募 集の概要

募 集 者 ： Asia

PacificRegionalInternetGovernanceForum(APrIGF)
締め切り：2016 年 8 月 26 日 UTC23:59 (JST 翌 08:59)

b. コ メ ン ト 募 集の内容

APrIGF の議論において着目された課題とそれらへの姿勢を文書化し、意見募集。
課題の分類は Next Billion Online、Security、Human Rights andthe Internet、Multistakeholder Model、Digital Economy and3

Trade、Future Impact。
有志による翻訳募集の案も出ている。
c. コメント方法

APrIGF のコメント募集サイトへの意見提出(英語)http://comment.rigf.asia/

d. 参考情報「 APrIGF Synthesis Document v2 now open for publiccomment」
https://2016.aprigf.asia/2016/08/15/aprigf-synthesis-documentv2-now-open-for-public-comment/4参考情報 1
今後 10 年に向けた IGF の改善：IGF RETREAT PROCEEDINGSNational and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs)に関する項目抜粋:
Alignment to the IGF and global agenda related to Internet governance·Participants were reminded that the NRIs are only recognized by the IGF and listed on the IGF website if
they meet the IGF principles of being open, inclusive, transparent, non-commercial and respecting themultistakeholder model.
·It was suggested that there could be a clear and close alignment of the NRIs to the global IGF and theTunis Agenda. At the same time, governments could consider utilizing or leveraging on the work of the NRIs toimplement outcomes of the WSIS Action Lines.
·Some suggested that the NRIs should stay independent and unique, as they are organic in their creation,
while others suggested incorporating the NRIs more tightly into the overall IGF work processes. One concern
was raised that NRIs do not have mandates provided for in the Tunis Agenda, and another concern questioned
what closer affiliation with the global IGF would mean. Some noted NRIs are diverse, complex, autonomousand bottom-up, and should remain independent from the IGF. Similarly, it was recommended to avoid
stipulating that interactions with and among NRIs occur through hierarchical mechanisms such as anational-regional-global chain or pyramid. There was a general reticence to imposing any strict control overthem. At the same time, engagement with NRIs who wish to be more closely involved in the IGF’s work should
be strengthened.
Visibility and Access to Information·It was suggested that the IGF website and NRIs mailing list could be improved to help with informationexchange. Other tools such as social media could also be used as collaborative platform between the IGF andthe NRIs.
·A periodic regular newsletter could be sent out to ensure continuity of information flow with the NRIs.
Where resources are available, any content on the IGF website could be available in multiple languages (i.e. 6UN official languages) for content to be accessible to non-English users.

Outreach and Capacity Building·In addition to increased communication efforts with the NRIs, some suggested that a collaborative andbilateral relationship might be initiated, where the global IGF could reach out to the NRIs more systematicallyand with established guidelines. Tighter, more specific guidelines could be developed for the establishment ofNRIs. This perspective shared that NRIs could be more functionally involved in the IGF work. On this note, it
was called for NRIs to further integrate their work into the IGF annual programme, in alignment with itsthemes.

·It was suggested that a stronger connection between the global IGF and the NRIs could also be createdthrough capacity building activities. In this suggestion, one ne of the work streams of the IGF Secretariat could
be in these capacity development efforts and within the MAG, there could be dedicated working groups for this.
It was noted the NRIs may also need more financial support.
·The IGF Secretariat could improve its communication platforms for outreach to the NRIs. It was notedthat a capacity building strategy and a clear action plan could also be put in place.

·It was suggested there could be a more systematic and analytical approach toward the engagement of
the work of the NRIs. For instance, it would be a useful exercise to evaluate the extent of the multistakeholder
process within each of the initiatives.

5参考情報 2Connecting the Next Billion Online Phase IIProposed questions to guide your response:
While inputs of any format will be considered for incorporation, a suggested format could include
bullet points addressing some or all of the following questions:
1.
2.

3.

4.

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

How would you define, or how do you understand, the theme “Connecting and Enabling

the Next Billion”?

The first phase of Connecting and Enabling the Next Billion (2015) identified a set ofpolicy options aimed at the creation of enabling environments, including deploying
infrastructure, increasing usability, enabling users, and ensuring affordability. What are
the factors to consider when adopting these policy options at local levels (e.g. the state of acountry’s market development, the available infrastructure, level of capacity-building, etc.).
Are you aware of any specificities around connectivity at a local or regional level? (In otherwords, do you know of factors that impact connectivity in, for instance, rural areas but lessso at an urban level? Or factors that affect connectivity at regional or larger scale, but not
as noticeably at local or smaller scale?)
Data shows that the growth of Internet adoption is slowing down in some areas, especiallyas broadband services extend to more remote, less densely populated areas (facing
challenges beyond affordability and availability).1[1] What are some of the barriers or
limitations preventing people who do have Internet access from being enabled or
empowered through such connectivity?
What does meaningful access mean?
How can connectivity contribute to reaching the new SDGs?
Do you know examples of stories where using ICTs to support development has notworked, and why?
Can you think of ways in which ICTs or Internet connectivity could be used to help reachthe SDGs?
Do you know of examples of success stories that can illustrate how Internet access canhelp to address real-world problems (in either developed or developing countries)? For
example, do you have stories or experiences to share regarding some or all of the following
SDG-related questions:•How can connecting and enabling users help to reduce poverty in its various forms?
(SDG 1)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to end hunger, achieve food security
and support improved nutrition? (SDG 2)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to promote sustainable agriculture?
(SDG 2)•How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure healthy lives and to promote
well-being at all ages? (SDG 3)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure inclusive and equitable,
quality education? (SDG 4)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to promote lifelong learning
opportunities? (SDG 4)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to achieve gender equality? (SDG 5)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to empower women and girls? (SDG 5)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure the availability andsustainable management of water and sanitation? (SDG 6)•
How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure access to affordable, reliable,sustainable and modern energy? (SDG 7)

6

•
•
•
•
•
•
•••
••••
•
•

How can connecting and enabling users help to promote sustained, inclusive andsustainable economic growth? (SDG 8)
How can connecting and enabling users help to promote full and productive
employment? (SDG 8)
How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure decent work? (SDG 8)
How can connecting and enabling users help to build resilient infrastructure,promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation? (SDG 9)
How can connecting and enabling users help to reduce inequality within and among
countries? (SDG 10)
How can connecting and enabling users help to make cities and human settlements
inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable? (SDG 11)
How can connecting and enabling users help to ensure sustainable consumption andproduction patterns? (SDG 12)
How can connecting and enabling users help to combat climate change and its
impacts? (SDG 13)
How can connecting and enabling users help to conserve and sustainably use theoceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development? (SDG 14)
How can connecting and enabling users help to protect, restore and promotesustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat
desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss?
(SDG 15)
How can connecting and enabling users help to promote peaceful and inclusive
societies for sustainable development? (SDG 16)
How can connecting and enabling users help to provide access to justice for all? (SDG16)
How can connecting and enabling users help to build effective, accountable andinclusive institutions at all levels? (SDG 16)
How can connecting and enabling users help to strengthen the means ofimplementation (SDG 17)
How can connecting and enabling users help to revitalize the global partnership forsustainable development? (SDG 17)

7