European Asylum Support Office

EASO Country of
Origin Information
Report
The former Yugoslav
Republic of MacedoniaCountry Focus

November 2016SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION

European Asylum Support Office

EASO Country of
Origin Information
Report
The former Yugoslav
Republic of MacedoniaCountry Focus

November 2016SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION

Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers
to your questions about the European Union.

Freephone number (*):

00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11(*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls
may be billed.

Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016
More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu).
Print

ISBN 978-92-9494-282-1

doi:10.2847/538738

BZ-07-16-015-EN-C

PDF

ISBN 978-92-9494-283-8

doi:10.2847/71303

BZ-07-16-015-EN-N© European Asylum Support Office, 2016
Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use
which may be made of the information contained herein.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 3

Acknowledgments
EASO would like to acknowledge Hungary, Office of Immigration & Nationality, COI unit as author of this report.
The following departments reviewed this report:
Slovak Republic, Ministry of the Interior of the Slovak Republic, Migration Office, Department of Documentation
and Foreign Cooperation.
The Netherlands, Immigration and Naturalisation Service, Office for Country Information and Language Analysis(OCILA).

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 5

Contents
Acknowledgments����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3
Disclaimer������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 7
Abbreviations������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 9
Introduction������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 10
Methodology������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10
Map������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11
1.	 State structure������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 12
1.1. Introduction�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12
1.2. Constitution������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������12
1.3. Executive branch����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13
1.3.1. President�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13
1.3.2. Government�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13
1.4. Legislative branch: Assembly (Sobranie)��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 14
1.5. Administration��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������15
2. Socio-political landscape��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 16
2.1. Political parties������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 16
2.1.1. Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation – Democratic Partyof Macedonian National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE)�����������������������������������������������������������������������������16
2.1.2. Social Democratic Union of Macedonia – SDSM����������������������������������������������������������������������������� 17
2.1.3. Democratic Union for Integration – DUI������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 17
2.2. Elections����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 17
2.2.1. State Election Commission (SEC)������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������18
2.2.2. Parliamentary elections�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������18
2.3. Civil society organisations (CSOs)��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������19
2.4. Media���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 19
3. Rule of Law and State Protection��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 21
3.1. Law enforcement��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 21
3.1.1. Police/Intelligence services��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������21
3.1.2. Army�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������22
3.1.3. Corruption / fight against organised crime��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������23
3.2. Judiciary������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 24
3.2.1. Courts system�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������25
4. Security situation��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 27
5. Human rights situation������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 29
5.1. Legal context����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������29
5.2. General human rights situation�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������29
5.2.1. Freedom of expression���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������29
5.2.2. Freedom of religion��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������30
5.2.3. Freedom of association and assembly���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������30
5.2.4. Torture and other cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment and punishment����������������������������31
5.2.5. Detention����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31

6 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

5.3. Specific groups������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 32
5.3.1. Ethnic minorities / Inter-ethnic relations�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������32
5.3.2. Journalists and media����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������33
5.3.3. Human rights and peace defenders�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34
5.3.4. Women���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34
5.3.5. Children��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������34
5.3.6. LGBTI������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 35
5.3.7. Trafficked persons�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������35
5.3.8. Returnees�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������36
Bibliography������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 38
Terms of Reference�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 46

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 7

Disclaimer
This report was written according to the EASO COI Report Methodology (2012)(1). It is based on carefully selectedsources of information. All sources used are referenced. To the extent possible and unless otherwise stated, allinformation presented, except for undisputed or obvious facts, has been cross-checked.
The information contained in this report has been researched, evaluated and analysed with utmost care. However,this document does not claim to be exhaustive. If a particular event, person or organisation is not mentioned in
the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist.
Furthermore, this report is not conclusive as to the determination or merit of any particular claim to refugee status
or asylum. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position.
‘Refugee’, ‘risk’ and similar terminology are used as a generic terminology and not as legally defined in the EU Asylum
Acquis and the Geneva Convention.
Neither EASO nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of theinformation contained in this report.
Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged.
The target users are asylum caseworkers, COI researchers, policymakers, and decision‑making authorities.
The drafting of this report was finalised on 14 September 2016. Any event taking place after this date is not includedin this report. An exception to this cut-off date was made for the European Commission’s Communication on EU
Enlargement Policy issued 9 November 2016, the main findings of which were incorporated in this report.

(1)

The EASO methodology is largely based on the Common EU Guidelines for processing Country of Origin Information (COI), 2008, and can be downloaded
from the EASO website: http://www.easo.europa.eu.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 9

Abbreviations
CAHROM

Ad Hoc Committee of Experts on Roma and Traveller Issues

DCAF

Democratic Control of Armed Forces

ECHR

European Convention on Human Rights

ECRI

European Commission against Racism and Intolerance

ECtHR

European Court of Human Rights

fYRoM

former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

GRECOGroup of Countries against Corruption

IS

Islamic StateLPC

Law on the Prevention of Corruption

LPCI

Law on Prevention of Conflicts of Interest

MoI

Ministry of Interior

SDSM

Social Democratic Union of Macedonia

SEC

State Election Commission

SOCTA

Serious and Organized Crime Threat Assessment

OSCE

Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe

VMRO-DPMNE	Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation – Democratic Party of Macedonian NationalUnity

10 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Introduction
This Country Focus report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is written at the request of the European
Council for general background information and more detailed information relevant for international protection
status determination and for the assessment of the applicability of the safe country of origin concept to the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. For the designation of safe countries of origin, Annex I of the Asylum Procedures
Directive foresees that:‘A country is considered as a safe country of origin where, on the basis of the legal situation, the application of thelaw within a democratic system and the general political circumstances, it can be shown that there is generally andconsistently no persecution as defined in Article 9 of Directive 2011/95/EU, no torture or inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment and no threat by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international orinternal armed conflict.’ (2)In addition, ‘account shall be taken, inter alia, of the extent to which protection is provided against persecution or
mistreatment’ (3). The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Country Focus at hand covers the most important
information needs related to the above-mentioned criteria for safe country of origin designation, namely state
structure, socio-political landscape, rule of law and state protection, security situation and human rights situation.
The Terms of Reference can be found at the end of the report.
The report aims at providing an objective and neutral information base (without assessment or policy recommendations)that will allow for more informed policy discussions. It should be noted that the situation of third country nationals in
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (including persons transiting through the country or seeking international
protection in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) does not fall within the scope of this report.

Methodology• Defining the Terms of Reference
The Terms of Reference were defined on 8 April 2016 based on comments by members of the EASO COI Strategic
Network.
• Drafting process
The report was written by a Country of Origin Information (COI) specialist from Hungary, as listed under the
Acknowledgments section. The drafting of this report was finalised on 14 September 2016. An exception to this cut-off
date was made for the European Commission’s Communication on EU Enlargement Policy issued 9 November 2016,
the main findings of which were incorporated in this report.
• Quality control
In order to ensure that the authors respected the EASO COI Report Methodology, review was carried out by COI
specialists from the countries listed as reviewers in the Acknowledgments section.
All comments made by the reviewers were taken into consideration and most of them were implemented in the
final draft of this report.

(2)

Council of Europe, Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing
international protection (recast), 29 June 2013.

(3)

Council of Europe, Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing
international protection (recast), 29 June 2013.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 11

Map (4)S E R B I A

KosovoStracinaMark o v

Katlanovo

a

P

vic
a

aP

aP

I

BitolaMrezicko

Ko z

N

Brod

id

°

0

.

ka
vic
a

uf

Var
dar

M ale s e v s ki

St

Strumica

Miravci

Pl

.

ka

O

Dabiljagr

S tr uazdenPetrichm ic aBelasica
Valandovo
Novi
DojranLake
DojranGevgelija

THE FORMER YUGOSLAVREPUBLIC OF

MACEDONIA
National capital
41°
Opstina centre
Town, village
Major airport
International boundary
Opstina boundary
Super highway
Main road
Secondary road
Railroad
Canal

GREECE
Édhessa

Límni
Vegorritis
10

20
10

30
20

Thessalon’ki

40 km
30 mi

22°

Map No. 3789 Rev. 5 UNITED NATION
August 2007

(4)

Berovoze

Flórina
Límni
Mikri Préspa
The boundaries and names shown and the designations
used on this map do not imply official endorsement or
acceptance by the United Nations.
21

St a
ra

Krani

0

o

RadovisLa

BULGARIA

ios
Ax

A

Lake
PrespaCarn

Seleck

l.

N

Resen

Pogradeci

sa

to
Bla

a

a nic

A

TopolcaniKozjakLjubanista

iva

Kavadarci
Drenovo
Lake
TikvesPrilep

l.

ik a

Su
v

sk

Jab l

B

Demir
Hisar

Ohrid
Lake
Ohrid

Kr

Negotinoa

Sopotnica

Strugana

Stepanci

Krusevo

l.

Stip

ck

ca

D o s ni ca

Il in

im
Dr

L

ni
Cr

T r es k

Pla

ca
mi
ru

A

M. Brod

Meseista

Vinicama

Bogomila
KicevoKocani

Sveti
Nikole

Veles

Topo

a

42°

St r uziclka

Mavrovo

PrrenjasiadBelicaDebar

Delcevoca

RastesSamokovR

M. Kamenica
Probistip

vi

ad

K

Lake
Mavrovsko

arPl

Kratovo

Kadin aT reska

in-i-ziDr

Gostivar

ra
Go

e

lnica

Lake
Matka

vsk

eg a

Skopje

Bo

S

Va

ar
rd

O sog oK r ivaBraTearceTetovoKumanovo

Petrovec

Peshkopi

41°

S
Cr kop
na sk
G

a ora

P

a

in

ac

rin

r

n

la

Kriva
Palanka

Breg
aln
i

D

Kyustendil

L e pe nPrizren

42°

23°

cans
Nivi

)

Pcin
ja

ri m

Ba
bu

Be

(D

SERBIA

22°

21°

li

UN, Geospacial Information Section, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, August 2007.

23°
Department of Field Support
Cartographic Section

12 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

1.	 State structure
1.1.	Introduction
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia declared independence on 8 September 1991 after the disintegrationof the Social Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) (5).
According to data from the 2002 census (the last undertaken), quoted by the Bertelsmann Stiftung, ethnic Macedonians
make up 64 % of the total population while ethnic Albanians are the second-largest group with 25%, making them
the largest minority in the country. During the 1990s, the Albanians contested the nation-state approach of theformer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia politics, refusing the status of ethnic minority and urged for ‘an official biethnic state-system’ (6).
The security situation deteriorated in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia after the Kosovo crisis in 1999 and,in 2001, the hostility between Albanians and Macedonians led to an armed conflict. In August 2001, seven monthsof violence between ethnic Albanian guerrillas and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia authorities ended
with the Ohrid Framework Agreement (OFA). The OFA, an EU/US-mediated agreement envisioned a series of politicaland constitutional reforms, fulfilling much of the demands of Macedonian Albanians (7).
According to the EC Communication 2016, the country’s ‘name issue’ with Greece ‘needs to be resolved as a matterof urgency’ (8).
In 2001 the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia signed a Stabilization and Association Agreement with theEuropean Union. The EU supported the process of interethnic consolidation based on the OFA and the country
received the status of official candidate for EU membership in December 2005. The European Commission (EC) gave
recommendations to the European Council (CE) in 2013 and 2014 to open accession negotiations with the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which the CE did not follow (9).

1.2.	Constitution
The Constitution of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia was adopted on 17 November 1991 and successively
amended. The last amendment entered into force on 12 April 2011 (Amendment XXXII) and relates to citizenship.
The constitution is the supreme law and defines the organisation of the state authority, the separation of powers
and the rights of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s citizens (10).
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is as a sovereign, independent, democratic and social state withan indivisible and inalienable territory, although changes to its borders are foreseen in accordance with theconstitution (11).
According to Amendment V of the constitution (entered into force on 16 November 2001), the official languages of
the country are Macedonian, written in Cyrillic alphabet, and ‘any other language [and alphabet] spoken by at least
20 % of the population’. Languages spoken by less than 20 % of the population may be used in public bodies under
the decision of local self-government (12).
The official state symbols are laid down in the constitution, namely the coat of arms, the flag and the national
anthem (13).

(5)

Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016, p. 3.

(6)

Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016, p. 3.

(7)

Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016, p. 4.

(8)EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.

(9)Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016, p. 4.

(10) WIPO, FYRoM, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 2011.
(11) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 1.
(12) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(13) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 13

One of the most important amendments of the constitution occurred on 7 September 2001, following the approvalof the Ohrid Agreement. The 16 November 2001 amendment gave improved rights to ethnic Albanians, via therevision of the preamble, the official languages, religion and local government (14).

1.3.	Executive branch
1.3.1. President
According to Chapter 2. of the constitution, the president must be a ‘citizen of the Republic of Macedonia’, be over
40 years of age, and have lived in the country for at least 10 of the previous 15 years. He is simultaneously head ofstate and commander-in-chief of the armed forces (15).
Article 84 of the constitution determines the president’s mandate, which is proposing, appointing and dismissing
holders of state and public office (16). According to the Foundation Robert Schuman’s analysis on the 2014 presidential
elections, the president’s powers are ‘relatively limited and the position is mainly an honorary one’ (17).
Gjorge Ivanov is the current President of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (18). Ivanov was elected after
two rounds of elections held on 13 and 27 April 2014 (19). Ivanov is serving his second and last term in office (20).
According to Presidential Power, a scholars’ blog focused on presidents and presidential politics, Ivanov was thecandidate of the ‘right-wing populist VMRO-DPMNE [Revolutionary Organisation-Democratic Party for National
Unity] party’ (21). The Globesec 2015 forum for foreign policy and security in Central Europe reports that although
Ivanov was never a party member, he ‘was active in designing the reform policy of the political party VMRO-DPMNE,
the party that supported his presidential nomination at the 2009 elections’ (22).
According to the OSCE/ODIHR observation mission’s report, the April 2014 presidential elections (23) were ‘efficiently
administered’, took place with no obstructions to the campaign and also respected the freedoms of assembly andassociation. The report adds that there was, however, ‘inadequate separation between party and state activities’,and ‘allegations of voter intimidation’ during the campaign, with appeals by the ruling ethnic-Albanian party toethnic-Albanian’s boycott in the presidential elections, endangering the OSCE’s principle of voting ‘free of fear of
retribution’ (24).

1.3.2. Government
According to the constitution, the structure and organisation of the state’s authority is based on the clear divisionof state powers between the legislative, the executive and the judicial branches. Executive power lies with theGovernment of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, which exercises its mandate within the framework of
the constitution and the law (25).
The Government holds executive power, is directly accountable to the Assembly, and is responsible for: policy
formulation, execution of laws and regulations of the Assembly, regulation and supervision of the work of public
administration entities and foreign policy (26).

(14) Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame, Constitutional Reform: Ohrid Agreement, n.d.
(15) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(16) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(17) Foundation Robert Schuman, The authorities in office are due to strengthen their power after the presidential and legislative elections in Macedonia,
13 April 2014.
(18) President of the Republic of Macedonia Dr Gjorge Ivanov [website], Biography, n.d.
(19) OSCE, FYRoM, Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014, Final Report, 15 July 2014.
(20) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(21) Presidential Power [blog], Macedonia – Ruling party wins parliamentary election and presidential run-off, 13 April 2014.
(22) Globsec.org [website], Globesec 2015, Gjorge Ivanov, n.d.
(23) The 2014 Macedonian presidential and early parliamentary elections occurred simultaneously on 27 of April 2014.
(24) OSCE, FYRoM, Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014, Final Report, 15 July 2014.
(25) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 8.
(26) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 91.

14 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

The Government is composed of a prime minister and several ministers, who cannot be representatives in the
Assembly, nor hold any other public office or profession (27).
In February 2015, a political crisis emerged when Zoran Zaev, head of the leading opposition party (Social Democratic
Union - SDSM), unveiled the so-called ‘wiretapping scandal’, exposing hundreds of thousands of illegally recorded
conversations from more than 20,000 telephone numbers (28).
After months of political unrest, the EU facilitated the ‘2 June [2015] Agreement’, where the four main politicalparties, VMRO-DPMNE, SDSM, DUI, and DPA reaffirmed their commitment to the Euro-Atlantic process and to thedemocratic principles (29). This agreement created a transitional period until the following legislative elections, due
to be held by the end of April 2016, and the setting up of a special prosecutor to investigate the wiretapping (30).
According to the ‘Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues relating to thecommunications interception revealed in Spring 2015’, the wiretapping was carried out by the National Security
Service of Macedonia (UKB), ‘on behalf of the government, to control top officials in the public administration,prosecutors, judges and political opponents with a consequent interference in the independence of the judiciaryand other relevant national institutions’ (31).
In January 2016, Prime Minister Nicola Gruevski resigned, under the terms of the EU 2 June Agreement and theSecretary-general of VMRO-DPMNE, Emil Dimitriev, was nominated as interim prime minister (32).
On 12 April 2016, President Gjorge Ivanov issued a pardon to 56 top politicians, blocking the work of the special
prosecution, which led to social unrest and anti-government demonstrations. After condemnation by the EU andthe US, Ivanov revoked the pardons in June 2016 (33).
According to the EC Communication 2016, ‘on 20 July and 31 August 2016, leaders of the four main political parties
reached a deal on the implementation of the Pržino Agreement (34), including by setting 11 December 2016 as the datefor early parliamentary elections and declaring their support to the work of the Special Prosecutor. They reiterated
also their commitment to implement the ‘Urgent Reform Priorities (35)’ (36).

1.4.	Legislative branch: Assembly (Sobranie)
According to the constitution, the Assembly of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia represents the country’s
citizens and holds legislative power (37).
The Assembly is unicameral and is composed of 120 to 140 representatives, elected in general, direct, secret
elections, for a four-year term (38).
The Assembly is responsible, inter alia, for:• Changing and adopting constitutional amendments, laws, declarations, resolutions, recommendations andconclusions;• Ratifying international agreements and deciding on war and peace;• Deciding on any changes regarding the borders;(27) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 89.
(28) Balkan Insight, Macedonia PM Rallies Supporters After Wiretap Scandal, 15 March 2015; New York Times (The), Europe, Tiny Macedonia Confronts a Supersize
Scandal, 14 May 2015; New York Times (The), Europe, Macedonia Government Is Blamed for Wiretapping Scandal, 21 June 2015.
(29) EC, Statement following today’s mission of Commissioner Hahn to former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 2 June 2015.
(30) EC, 2 June Agreement, 19 June 2015; EC, Johannes Hahn, Statement, Agreement in Skopje to overcome political crisis, 15 July 2015.
(31) Priebe, R. et al, FYRoM: Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues relating to the communications interception revealedin Spring 2015, 8 June 2015.
(32) Independent Balkan News Agency, Gruevski resigns. Dimitriev appointed as new prime minister, 15 January 2016.
(33) Balkan Insight, Macedonia President Revokes All Controversial Pardons, 6 June 2016.
(34) EC, Agreement in Skopje to overcome political crisis, 15 July 2015; the Pržino Agreement [15 July 2015] ‘builds on the 2 June accord and includes the returnto Parliament by the SDSM, the organisation of the new government, preparing the elections […] and the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate
the issues surrounding or arising from the interception of communications’.
(35) EC, Urgent Reform Priorities for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, June 2015.
(36) EC, 2016 Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy, 9 November 2065, p. 22.
(37) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 61.
(38) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 62-63.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 15

• Electing and carrying out political monitoring and supervision of the government;• Electing judges to the Constitutional Court;• Carrying out elections and discharging judges,• Selecting, appointing and dismissing holders of public and other offices (39).
GRECO’s Fourth Evaluation Round report indicates that the parliamentary process is ‘fairly transparent’ concerning
plenary sessions and committee meetings but is less positive regarding public participation in the law-making process,where public consultation is ‘optional and seldom organised’ (40).
Early parliamentary elections were held on 27 April 2014 as a result of the Assembly’s dissolution at the initiative of
the Democratic Union for Integration (DUI) (41).
VMRO-DPMNE gained 61 seats, the opposition SDSM won 34, the Albanian DUI gained 19, and the Democratic Partyof Albanians (DPA) received 7.
Immediately after polls closed, SDSM’s leader Zoran Zaev announced that he would not recognise the results andasked for new elections. The SDSM’s representatives of the Assembly did not accept their mandates (7 May 2014) (42).
In late August 2015, as part of the 2 June Agreement, the opposition returned to the Assembly (43).

1.5.	Administration
According to the constitution, state administration bodies execute their tasks autonomously and are accountable
to the Government (Article 96 of the Constitution) (44).
The Government and its ministers are accountable to the Assembly, which carries out political oversight of theGovernment and of holders of public office (45).
As a part of the pre-accession process, the EU has provided financial assistance to the former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia to support the country’s Strategy and Action Plan for the Reform of the Public Administration (46), via
the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA, IPA II) (47).
According to the European Court of Auditors audit on IPA I projects, ‘relatively limited progress was made instrengthening the country’s administrative capacity […]. The projects we audited generally delivered the planned
outputs but these were often not fully exploited. In some cases projects had limited impact and were notsustainable’ (48).
The 2015 Bertelsmann report indicates that administrative structures exist in the former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia and ‘provide most basic services throughout the country’ (49). The same source adds the there isa high level of political interference in public administration, a weak management of public finances, noting that
employment in public administration is often based on political allegiance.Although the Ministry of Information
Society and Public Administration has responsibility to implement administrative reforms, the Prime Minister makes
the most important decisions (50).

(39) OSCE, FYRoM, Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014, Final Report, 15 July 2014.
(40) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Fourth Evaluation Round, Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament, judges and prosecutors, 17 March 2014.
(41) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(42) OSCE, FYRoM Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014, Final Report, 15 July 2014.
(43) Balkan Insight, Macedonia Opposition MPs Return to Parliament, 1 September 2015.
(44) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 96.
(45) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(46) Ministry of Information Society and Administration, Public Administration Reform Strategy 2010-2015, 21 December 2010.
(47) EC, FYRoM - financial assistance under IPA II, n.d.
(48) European Court of Auditors, Strengthening administrative capacity in the FYRoM: limited progress in a difficult context, June 2016.
(49) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(50) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.

16 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

2.	 Socio-political landscape
2.1.	Political parties
The political parties represented in the Assembly of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (2014-2018
legislature) are:• Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation – Democratic Party of Macedonian National Unity(VMRO-DPMNE)• GROM• Democratic Renewal of Macedonia• Democratic Party of Albanians (DPA)• Democratic Party of Serbs in Macedonia• Democratic Party of the Turks in Macedonia• Democratic Union for Integration• Democratic Union• Liberal - Democratic Party• Independent Members• New Social-Democratic Party• Party for Movement of the Turks• Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia• Socialist Party of Macedonia• Union of Roma of Macedonia• Party for Democratic Action of Macedonia (51).
According to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s State Election Commission (SEC), the Internal Macedonian
Revolutionary Organisation – Democratic Party of Macedonian National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE) and the Social
Democratic Union of Macedonia (SDSM) coalitions collected the majority of votes in the 2014 early parliamentaryelections, (61 and 34 seats in parliament, respectively) (52). The Bertelsmann Stiftung indicates that the two parties
have alternated in power since their creation in the early 1990s. The source adds that ethnic nationalism andclientelism are very influential factors in parliamentary elections in the country (53).

2.1.1. Internal Macedonian Revolutionary Organisation – Democratic Party of Macedonian
National Unity (VMRO-DPMNE)
According to the International Crisis Group (ICG), the VMRO-DPMNE is a centre-right, ethnic Macedonian nationalist
party (54). It was founded on 17 June 1990 and describes itself as Christian-democratic. The VMRO-DPMNE boycotted
the 1994 parliamentary elections; in November 1998 the party came to power and formed a coalition government
with the Democratic Alternative (DA) and the Democratic Party of Albanians (DPA) (55).
After the 2002 parliamentary elections – and the subsequent defeat at the presidential elections in 2004 – the party
split. Two competing factions emerged: the first was formed by supporters of the present VMRO-DPMNE leader,
Nikolai Gruevski, and the second was dominated by the radical nationalist supporters of the previous VMRO-DPMNE
leader, Lubjo Georgievski. In June 2004, the latter faction left the party and became the VMRO-People’s Party. Afterthe 2006 elections, the VMRO-DPMNE became the largest party in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (56).

(51) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Members of Parliament, Current structure 2014-2018, n.d.
(52) State Election Commission, Early Parliamentary and Presidential Elections 2014, 9 May 2014.
(53) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(54) ICG, Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs, 9 July 2015.
(55) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(56) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 17

2.1.2. Social Democratic Union of Macedonia – SDSM
According to the Norwegian Centre for Research Data, the SDSM emerged from the defunct League of Communists –Party for Democratic Reform. The ICG notes that it is a reformed, former communist entity from Yugoslav times (57).
From September 1992 to 1998 the SDSM was the largest party in the assembly, showing a moderate, reconciliatory
attitude towards ethnic minorities in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (58).
In September 2002 elections an SDSM-led pre-election coalition won half of the seats in parliament and Branko
Crvenkovski was elected Prime Minister in coalition with the ethnic Albanian Democratic Union for Integration party(DUI) and the Liberal-Democratic Party (LDP) (59).
The 2006 elections were not favourable to the SDSM. The ‘Together for Macedonia Coalition’ only gained 32 seatsand lost its governing position to the VMRO-DPMNE. SDSM’s leader, Vlado Buchovski, stepped down after theelection defeat. In 2013, Branko Crvenkovski resigned from the leader’s position. Zoran Zaiev was elected as theparty’s president (60).
Since the legislative elections in July 2006, the party is in opposition. Its support base is historically Macedonian andparticularly strong in rural areas (61).
The SDSM coalition won 34 seats in the 27 April 2014 parliamentary elections (62) (see 2.2.2 Parliamentary elections).

2.1.3. Democratic Union for Integration – DUIThe Democratic Union for Integration was formed 3 months before the June 2002 elections. It is the successor to
the Albanian National Liberation Army (NLA), which fought the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia security
forces in 2001 (63).
The DUI’s leader, Ali Ahmeti, was one the original ethnic Albanian guerrillas and overall commander of NLA in 2001 (64).
In 2004, the DUI indicated its commitment to Albanian integration in a multi-ethnic country (65).
In the 2014 early parliamentary elections, the DUI was part of the SDSM coalition and took 19 seats in the national
Assembly (66).

2.2.	Elections
Elections in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia are regulated by the constitution (67) and the Electoral
Code (68), and supplemented by regulations promulgated by the State Election Commission (SEC) (69).
The electoral system includes the SEC, 80 Municipal Election Commissions and about 3,500 Electoral Boards (70).
According to the Association of European Election Officials (ACEEEO), the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s
electoral system establishes that members of parliament are elected by proportional representation, under closed
lists. The source adds that members of parliament are eligible for election under the following conditions:(57) ICG, Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs, 9 July 2015.
(58) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(59) Global Security, Macedonia – Politics, n.d.
(60) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(61) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(62) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Members of Parliament, last update 27 January 2016.
(63) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(64) ICG, Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs, 9 July 2015.
(65) European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016.
(66) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Members of Parliament, last update 27 January 2016.
(67) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(68) CoE, Venice Commission, Electoral Code of the FYRoM, consolidated version as of November 2015, 020, 24 February 2016.
(69) ACEEEO, Elections in Europe, Development of Electoral Systems in Central and Eastern Europe since 1991, 2016, pp. 190-202.
(70) ACEEEO, Elections in Europe, Development of Electoral Systems in Central and Eastern Europe since 1991, 2016, pp. 190-202.

18 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus‘Any eligible voter can be a candidate, except those who have been sentenced by a final court decision to morethan six months imprisonment and did not complete their sentence. The law also identifies a range of governmentand government-related positions that are incompatible with candidacy. It is satisfactory that the citizens holding
these positions resign after the successful elections.
Candidates can be nominated by political parties, coalitions of political parties, or by groups of voters. Candidate
lists submitted by groups of voters are required to provide at least 1,000 supporting signatures of voters residingin the respective district’ (71).
According to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s constitution, all citizens over 18 have the right to vote,
except those deprived of the right to practice their profession by a court verdict (72).

2.2.1. State Election Commission (SEC)The State Election Commission is, according to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s Electoral Code, thelegal entity responsible for ‘safeguarding the legality of the preparation and the administration of the elections’ andis equally responsible for the supervision of the work of the election management bodies (73).
The SEC is mandated to initiate disciplinary or misdemeanour proceedings and submit criminal complaints when
the Electoral Code has been violated (74).
The Commission is composed of one president, one vice-president and five members, elected by parliament fora four-year term which is renewable. The SEC also includes a secretary general and a deputy (75).
Other than the SEC, the bodies responsible for administering elections are:• Municipal Election Commissions and Election Commission of the City of Skopje;• Election Boards;• Election Boards for voting in the diplomatic/consular offices (76).
According to the ‘Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues relating to thecommunications interception revealed in Spring 201, the SEC showed inaction by not initiating any proceedings
to determine if there were violations to the Electoral Code. The experts noted that the SEC ‘is regarded by many
interlocutors as politicized and incapable of acting independently due to undue political influence from all parties’ (77).

2.2.2. Parliamentary elections
Early parliamentary elections held in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on 27 April 2014 were won by
VMRO-DPMNE and guaranteed 61 out of 123 seats in the Assembly. Its coalition partner, DUI, secured another19 seats. International monitors identified serious problems with the voting process. The opposition party SDSM
boycotted parliament after the elections along with the Democratic Party of Albanians, the smaller Albanian party(DPA) (78).
According to the Intern-Parliamentary Union (IPU), the 2014 early parliamentary elections were triggered bya disagreement within the governing coalition over the presidential candidate (79). The source adds:‘During the election campaign, VMRO-DPMNE, in power since 2006, promised to grant aid totalling one million
euros to businesses to stimulate job creation. The SDSM accused the VMRO-DPMNE of having increased thegap between the rich and the poor and promised the “restoration” of the middle class. The DUI urged ethnic
Albanians (who make up a quarter of the population) to boycott the presidential elections while encouraging
them to participate in the parliamentary polls. The SDSM stated that it would not recognize the entire electoral(71) ACEEEO, Elections in Europe, Development of Electoral Systems in Central and Eastern Europe since 1991, 2016, pp. 190-202.
(72) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 22.
(73) CoE, Venice Commission, Electoral Code of the FYRoM, consolidated version as of November 2015, art. 31.
(74) CoE, Venice Commission, Electoral Code of the FYRoM, consolidated version as of November 2015, art. 31.
(75) CoE, Venice Commission, Electoral Code of the FYRoM, consolidated version as of November 2015, art. 26.
(76) CoE, Venice Commission, Electoral Code of the FYRoM, consolidated version as of November 2015, art. 17.
(77) Priebe, R. et al, FYRoM: Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Group on systemic Rule of Law issues relating to the communications interception revealedin Spring 2015, 8 June 2015.
(78) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(79) IPU, the FYRoM, Sobranie (Assembly of the Republic), n.d.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 19

process, both parliamentary and presidential. The observers from the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutionsand Human Rights stated that both elections were “efficiently administered” but “the majority of monitored
media was largely biased in favour of the ruling party”’ (80).
As mentioned already (see 1.3.2 Government), in January 2016, Prime Minister Nicola Gruevski resigned under theterms of the EU 2 June Agreement and the Secretary-General of VMRO-DPMNE, Emil Dimitriev, was nominatedas interim prime minister (81).
The next early parliamentary elections in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia are due to take place on
11 December 2016 (82).

2.3.	Civil society organisations (CSOs)
The establishment of CSOs in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is governed by the Law on Associations
and Foundations (83) while the government Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society (20122017), adopted in the scope of the EU accession discussions, defines the methods of cooperation and partnership
between the Government and civil society (84).
The Government says the abovementioned strategy aims to develop the role of CSOs, strengthen ‘mutual trust’,support the participation of CSOs in the decision-making processes, as well as implement the strategy itself (85).
The EC’s IPA II strategy report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia indicates that CSOs are abundant in
the country and have contributed to ‘holding governments accountable and improving the human rights situationin general (86).
However, the EC stresses that the ‘sustainability of their commitment is questionable without the continuation offoreign funding’ (87).
According to the EC Communication 2016:‘Civil society played a constructive role in supporting democratic processes and ensuring greater checks andbalances. At the same time, civil society organisations continue to express their concerns about the deteriorationof the climate in which they operate and the limited government commitment to dialogue, as well as about public
attacks by politicians and pro-government media’ (88).
The constitution guarantees the freedoms of assembly and association (89). According to Freedom House and Civil
Rights Defenders (CRD), a Swedish international human rights organisation, those rights are ‘generally respected’.
Despite that, Freedom House adds that CSOs are ‘often polarised along political lines’ (90).
For more information, see 5.2.3 Freedom of association.

2.4.	Media
According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the competent state authorities responsible formedia in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia include (91):Ministry of Information Society and Administration (92);(80) IPU, the FYRoM, Sobranie (Assembly of the Republic), n.d.
(81) Independent Balkan News Agency, Gruevski resigns. Dimitriev appointed as new prime minister, 15 January 2016(82) DW, Macedonia parties agree on election date in December, 31 August 2016.
(83) ICNL, Law on Associations and Foundations, 2010.
(84) Government of Republic of Macedonia, Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society: 2012-2017, 2012.
(85) Government of Republic of Macedonia, Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society: 2012-2017, 2012.
(86) EC, IPA II 2014-2020, FYRoM, Civil Society Facility and Media Programme 2014-2015, 2015.
(87) EC, IPA II 2014-2020, FYRoM, Civil Society Facility and Media Programme 2014-2015, 2015.
(88) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 22.
(89) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, articles 20-21, 1991 amended 2011.
(90) FH, Freedom in the World, Macedonia, 2016; CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(91) ITU, TFYR Macedonia Profile, latest data 2015.
(92) Ministry of Information Society and Administration, n.d.

20 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus• Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services (93);• Agency for Electronic Communications (regulatory agency) (94).
The International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX), Macedonia Media Sustainability Index 2016 reports that
although ‘two media trade associations’ exist in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [the Association of Private
Media of Macedonia (APEMM) and the Association of Macedonian Internet Portals (AMIP)], both are inactive (95).
The legal framework of the media and telecommunications can be found on the Agency for Audio and Audiovisual
Media Services official website (96).
According to IREX 2016 Media Sustainability Index, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has 10 daily andthree weekly newspapers, 20 other periodicals, several national, regional and local radio stations, five state television
stations, five digital national broadcasters and various other national, regional and local TV stations (97).
According to the CIA World Factbook 2016, the country has 1,475 million Internet users, representing about 70.4
% of the population (98).
More detailed lists of the main press, TV, radio and news agencies in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
can be found in the BBC News profile on the country (99).

(93) Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services, n.d.
(94) Agency for Electronic Communications, n.d.
(95) IREX, Macedonia, Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016, p. 93, 2016.
(96) Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services, n.d.
(97) IREX, Macedonia, Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016, p. 80, 2016.
(98) CIA, World Factbook, Macedonia, last updated 27 October 2016.
(99) BBC News, Macedonia profile – Media, 19 May 2015.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 21

3.	 Rule of Law and State Protection
3.1.	Law enforcement
3.1.1. Police/Intelligence services
The Ministry of Interior is responsible for policing (100).
There are two units responsible for law enforcement within the Ministry (101): the Bureau of Public Safety and the
Directorate for Security and Counterintelligence. Their duties are regulated by the Law on Internal Affairs and theLaw on Police (102) and include:• Protecting life, personal safety, and property of the citizens;• Protecting freedoms and human rights;• Preventing crimes and misdemeanours, detecting and apprehending perpetrators;• Maintaining public order;• Regulating and controlling traffic;• Control movement and residence of foreigners;• State border security and state border crossing control (103).
There are specialised units within the Ministry that deal with economic organised crime, money laundering andfinancial investigation, corruption or drug trafficking (104).
Pointpulse, a civil-society organisation dedicated to oversee police integrity, refers to the fact that there is no specificlegislation for the counterintelligence service’s activities (105). According to the Bertelsmann Stiftung, although theformer Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s authorities have control over law enforcement, there are doubts over who
controls the civilian intelligence services (106).
Pointpulse indicates that the internal oversight of the police activities is done by the Department of Internal Control,
Criminal Investigations and Professional Standards (DICCIPS) (107).
Analytica, a think tank and public policy research organisation from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
indicates that external oversight on the performance of the Ministry of Interior, including the police, is carried out
by the country’s Parliamentary Committees – the Committee on Security and Defence and the Standing Inquiry
Committee for Protection of Civil Freedoms and Rights – as well as by the Ombudsman (108).
The Bertlesmann Stiftung indicates that police oversight mechanisms are still problematic. According to the 2016
BTI report:‘The parliamentary committee in charge of the civilian intelligence service did not manage to establish proper
oversight in 2013. The service continued to be headed by a close relative of the prime minister, and the
opposition’s boycott in 2014 prevented the parliamentary supervisory committee from convening. In return,civilian intelligence has consistently increased its budget and capacities since VMRO-DPMNE came to power in2006 and has increased its competence in legal changes announced in the beginning of 2014. Media and civilsociety actors cannot provide oversight because there is a systematic problem with access to information’ (109).

(100) INTERPOL, Members, FYRoM, n.d.
(101) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Ministries of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, n.d.
(102) Government of Macedonia, MoI, ‘Law on Police, Official Gazette 114/2006, 6/2009, 2009’.
(103) Pointpulse, Macedonian Police, 2 June 2016.
(104) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(105) Pointpulse, Macedonian Police, 2 June 2016.
(106) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(107) Pointpulse, Macedonian Police, 2 June 2016.
(108) Analytica, Assessing the Oversight Mechanisms of the Police Forces in Macedonia, December 2015; Ombudsman of the Republic of Macedonia, n.d.
(109) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.

22 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

The same source notes a ‘trend of security privatization’. Private security companies are legally empowered to
execute law-enforcement tasks, including detention, searching people, use of force, and are permitted to carry
firearms (110). Bertelsmann Stiftung adds that the Security Group Services dominates the private security market
and gets most of the public contracts, and the media reportedly linked the company to the director of the civilian
intelligence, who is related to the Prime Minister (111).

3.1.2. Army
The legal framework for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s Armed Forces includes the constitution andthe Defense Law (112).
The chain of command and control of the Armed Forces is as follows:• President – Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, approves the defence and strategy plan, and is the
Chairman of the country’s Security Council, where recommendations on defence and security themes aresent to the parliament and to the Government;• Parliament – supervises the Government with regards to defence, passes decisions in case of a direct war
threat, declares warfare situation and peace, and passes the defence budget.
• Government – proposes the defence plan and the defence budget;• Ministry of Defence – responsible for the defence strategy and threat/risk assessment, the defence system,
training and readiness of the Armed Forces (113).
The Armed Forces are tasked with protecting the lives and personal safety of civilians and guaranteeing theindependence and the territorial integrity of the state (114).
The country’s Armed Forces are divided into two service branches, the Ground Force and the Air Force, andincorporate the following units:• General Staff;• Joint Operational Command;• Training and Doctrine Command;• Special Operations Regiment;• Centre for Electronic Reconnaissance;• Ceremonial Guard Battalion (115).
The Armed Forces’ professional military personnel is composed of generals, officers, non-commissioned officers(NcOs) and soldiers (116).
According to 2014 data, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Armed Forces has 8,000 active members (117).
Military service is voluntary for individuals of 18 years of age and conscription was abolished in 2013 (118).
In recent years, the country’s Armed Forces has supported NATO-led missions in Afghanistan and Kosovo. According
to NATO, ‘the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia aspires to join’ the organisation; however, ‘the country has
to find a mutually acceptable solution with Greece to the issue over its name before it can be invited to join’ (119).

(110) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(111) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(112) Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d.
(113) Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d.
(114) Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d.
(115) Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d.
(116) Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d.
(117) Bogdanovski, A., Peacekeeping Contributor Profile: The Republic of Macedonia, August 2014.
(118) CIA, The World Factbook, Macedonia, Military and Security, last updated 3 August 2016.
(119) NATO, Relations with former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, last updated 7 April 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 23

3.1.3. Corruption / fight against organised crime
According to the fourth evaluation report of the Council of Europe (CoE) Group of States against Corruption (GRECO),
the fight against corruption has been a priority for the Government. There has been some improvement in the
public perception of corruption but it is still perceived as one of the main problems affecting the country, after
unemployment and poverty (120).
The State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (SCPC) and the State Audit Office supervise the implementationof the anti-corruption and conflict of interest legislation and policies in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (121).
According to the EC Communication 2016, the country has ‘some level of preparation’ in the fight against corruption.
However, the Communication adds, ‘corruption remains prevalent in many areas and continues to be a serious
problem’. Although ‘the legislative and institutional framework has been developed’, the ‘structural shortcomingsof the State Commission for Prevention of Corruption and political interference in its work have minimised theimpact of past efforts’ (122).
GRECO and the Bertelsmann Stiftung report that despite a legal framework on prevention of corruption – the Law on
the Prevention of Corruption (LPC) (123) and the Law on Prevention of Conflicts of Interest (LPCI) – its implementationand enforcement needs to be developed and made a priority (124).
The Bertelsmann Stiftung emphasises the role of the SCPC (and the State Audit Office (125)) but notes that both lackcapacity to act, are not publicly visible and their intervention in practice is limited (often self-limited). The source
adds that, in practice, actions against acting high-level officials are seldom; in recent years, Vlado Buchkovski, former
prime minister and defence minister, has been the only former high-level official jailed for abuse of power (two years
in prison in 2014) (126).
The SCPC’s State Programme for the Prevention and Repression of Corruption and Reduction of Conflict of Interest
Action Plan 2016 – 2019 (December 2015), indicates that the state’s strategy will focus on the ‘implementation andimpact’ of the ‘action plans for prevention and fight against corruption and conflict of interest’ (127).
According to the SCPC, the programme mirrors the input of ‘relevant institutions, civil society organizations, private
sector, international community and experts’ and its main guidelines were drafted in accordance with priorities,
recommendations and standards issued by the United Nations Convention against Corruption, the EU Progress
Reports and the list of Urgent Reform Priorities for the country issued by the EC, GRECO evaluations, Europe 2020
Strategy, among others (128).
In March 2016, the Ministry of Interior published its first Serious and Organized Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA),
supported by the OSCE, Switzerland, the Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) and experts
from EUROPOL (129). According to the assessment, organised crime groups (OCGs) in the former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia ‘act on both national and international level, mostly in drug trafficking, smuggling of migrants, andviolent and serious crime’ (130).
The report also indicates that OCGs differ in number and origin of their members and do not present a strict hierarchy.
Some groups act occasionally, others show continuity in their activities, based on family ties or on criminal interestsand one-third are ‘poly-criminal’ (131).

(120) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014.
(121) SCPC, n.d.; State Audit Office, n.d.
(122) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.
(123) SCPC, Law on Prevention of Corruption with Amendments, 2002.
(124) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014; Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(125) State Audit Office, Republic of Macedonia, n.d.
(126) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(127) SCPC, State Programme for the Prevention and Repression of Corruption and Reduction of Conflict of Interest Action Plan 2016 – 2019, December 2015.
(128) SCPC, State Programme for the Prevention and Repression of Corruption and Reduction of Conflict of Interest Action Plan 2016 – 2019, December 2015.
(129) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, MoI, FYRoM SOCTA 2015, 8 March 2016.
(130) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, MoI, FYRoM SOCTA 2015, 8 March 2016.
(131) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, MoI, FYRoM SOCTA 2015, 8 March 2016.

24 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

According to the EC’s Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) Indicative Strategy Paper for the former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (2014-2020), the country needs to be more pro-active when investigating organised
crime – by strengthening the powers of the police and the judiciary (132).
The EC Communication 2016 indicates that the country has ‘some level of preparation’ in the fight against organised
crime. Additionally, the Communication states, ‘the legislative framework is broadly in line with European standards
and strategies have been elaborated. However, the law enforcement capacity to investigate financial crimes andconfiscate assets needs to be developed further’ (133).

3.2.	Judiciary
According to the constitution, judicial power lies with the courts, and these are autonomous and independent statebodies (134).
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia‘s Law on Courts establishes that the country’s judicial power is
responsible for:• Impartially applying the law;
• Protecting, respecting and promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms,• Providing equity, equality, and no discrimination on any grounds;• Providing legal certainty based on the rule of law (135).
The judicial system comprises basic courts (first instance), courts of appeal, the administrative court, the higher
administrative court and the supreme court (136).
The system also includes the constitutional court, responsible for protecting constitutionality, legality, and thecitizens’ constitutional freedoms and rights. It also acts in conflicts between the three branches of government.
Under special conditions, the constitutional court may also remove the president from office (137).
In its Fourth Evaluation Round, the GRECO reports expresses concerns regarding allegations of lack of transparency
and impartiality in all categories of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s judiciary, which jeopardises efficiency
and credibility of the whole system. Greater transparency and the appropriate human and budget resources would
raise citizens’ confidence in the courts (138).
According to the EC Communication 2016,‘The country’s judicial system has some level of preparation. However, the situation has been backsliding since2014 and achievements of the previous decade’s reform process have been undermined by recurrent politicalinterference in the work of the judiciary. The authorities failed to demonstrate necessary political will to addresseffectively the underlying issues as identified in the ‘Urgent Reform Priorities’. The obstructions faced by the
newly established Special Prosecutor have shown the need to address effectively the lack of independence ofthe judiciary and to prevent selective justice’ (139).
According to the EC’s Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) Support to the Justice Sector action programme(2014-2020), although progress has been made since the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia‘s Strategy for
Judicial Reforms 2004-2007 was instigated – via policy, legislation and institutional changes – the country needs toapply further measures ‘in order to achieve full alignment with the Acquis and implementation of EU standards insuch an important area’ (140).
A group of senior experts led by retired EC’s director Reinhard Priebe drafted a paper on the recent ‘wiretapping
scandal’ (see further information in 1.3.2 Government, 2.2 Elections and 2.4 Media) indicated a number of(132) EC, Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) Indicative Strategy Paper for the FYRoM (2014-2020), 2014.
(133) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.
(134) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011.
(135) Republic of Macedonia, Law on Courts (amended 2012), art. 3, 2012.
(136) Republic of Macedonia, Law on Courts (amended 2012), art. 22, 2012.
(137) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, art. 108-113, 1991 amended 2011.
(138) CoE, GRECO, Fourth Evaluation Round, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, 17 March 2014.
(139) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.
(140) EC, IPA II 2014-2020, FYRoM, Support to the Justice Sector, 2014.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 25

serious deficiencies in the oversight mechanism of the judiciary and prosecution services, facilitating violationsof fundamental rights, lack of transparency in the nomination and appointment of judges, and weaknesses in thesystem of performance management for judges and court staff (141).
After several months of EU-brokered negotiations, the political parties agreed on the adoption of a new Law on
Special Prosecution and the appointment of a new special prosecutor responsible for investigating the allegations
raised by the illegal surveillance recordings (142).
The oversight of judges’ careers in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is performed by the Judicial Council.
This is an ‘autonomous and independent judicial body’, competent for the election, appointment and dismissal ofjudges, lay judges and presidents of courts, the monitoring and evaluation of the work of judges, disciplinary measuresand procedures, as well as revoking immunity of a judge (143).
In February 2015, parliament adopted a new Law on the Council Determining the Facts and Initiating Procedure for
Liability of Judges. This establishes a new judicial council responsible for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings
before the Judicial Council and for the preliminary investigation of disciplinary cases (144).
The CoE’s Venice Commission expressed concern regarding the need to set up a new council – with its inherent
costs – when clearly separating the functions should be sufficient to overcome any ‘mix of powers’ within the Judicial
Council. In the same opinion report, the Venice Commission also emphasised some apprehension about how the newcouncil was elected, given that about 200 out of 600 ballots cast by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s
judges were declared invalid (145).

3.2.1. Courts system
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s judicial system is divided into 27 basic courts (first instance), four
courts of appeal, the administrative court, the higher administrative court, the supreme court and the constitutional
court (146).
According to the GRECO’s Fourth Evaluation Round, there are no extraordinary or military courts in the country (147).
The 27 basic courts are established for one or more municipalities and adjudicate in first instance (148).
Two of the basic courts are specialised courts: the Skopje I Basic Court is a specialised criminal court for corruption
and organised crime cases and acts nationwide. Skopje II Basic Court is a specialised civil court. There are four courtsof appeal in Bitola, Gortivar, Skopje, and Shtip (149).
The Administrative Court in Skopje has a first-instance competence over the entire country. Its decisions can beappealed to the Higher Administrative Court (150).
The Supreme Court is competed in third and final instance in criminal, civil, and administrative cases (151).
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s constitutional court is composed of nine judges, elected by thecountry’s Assembly. The Constitutional Court elects a president from its own ranks for a term of three years without
the right to re-election; the term of office of the Constitutional Court judges is nine years with no re-election (152).

(141) FH, Nations in Transit 2016 - Macedonia, 12 April 2016.
(142) FH, Nations in Transit 2016 - Macedonia, 12 April 2016.
(143) CoE, Venice Commission, Legislation related to the Disciplinary Liability of Judges, n.d.
(144) CoE, Venice Commission, Opinion on the Laws on the Disciplinary Liability and Evaluation of Judges of “the FYRoM”, 21 December 2015.
(145) CoE, Venice Commission, Opinion on the Laws on the Disciplinary Liability and Evaluation of Judges of “the FYRoM”, 21 December 2015.
(146) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22.
(147) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22.
(148) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22.
(149) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22.
(150) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22(151) CoE, GRECO, Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 22.
(152) CoE, GRECO Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, p. 23.

26 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

According to the HeIsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia:‘In 2015 and 2016, the Constitutional Court was frequently criticized by the professional and general public,
and its work was also increasingly subject to media coverage. In circumstances when it is disputable whether
all of the members of the Constitutional Court are from the lines of “distinguished lawyers”, their political
appointment, disregard for their own previous practice, closing the sessions to the public and disregard for theopinions of the Venice Commission – raised reasonable doubts that the Court, instead of being a body protecting
constitutionality and lawfulness, had turned into an institution subordinate to the legislative and executive
authorities and political parties. This has seriously impaired the independence, impartiality, competence andlegitimacy of the Constitutional Court’ (153).
The constitution establishes the principle of priority and urgency in access to justice (154); the law on criminal procedure
establishes that anyone charged with a crime has the right to a fair and public trial before an independent andimpartial court (155). According to CoE’s GRECO, practice shows that there is excessive length of judicial and progressproceedings, although new measures for reducing judicial backlogs in all courts have shown some progress (156).
According to 2014 former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s statistical data quoted by the coalition of civil associations
All for Fair Trial, there were 656 active judges in the country, assigned as follows: ‘484 at the basic courts, 30 at theAdministrative Court, 109 at the appeals courts, 10 at the Higher Administrative Court and 23 at the Supreme Court’.
By the end of the same year, the number of judges decreased to 608 (157).

(153) HeIsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia, The Constitutional Court in the Grip between Political Interests and Human Rights, 2016.
(154) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 50.
(155) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Criminal Procedure Law, 18 November 2010, art. 5.
(156) CoE, GRECO Evaluation Report the FYRoM, Fourth Evaluation Round, 17 March 2014, pp. 2 and 31.
(157) All for Fair Trials, NGOs and the judiciary - watch dog activities, interactions, collaboration, communication, Country Report, Republic of Macedonia, 2015.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 27

4.	 Security situation
According to Global Intake, an intelligence and information monitoring provider, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMacedonia is one of the most stable former Yugoslav republics, managing to successfully reduce the 2001 ethnic
tensions and insurgency in 2001 (158) within the terms of the Framework Agreement Concluded at Ohrid (the Ohrid
Agreement) (159).
However, the same source adds that the country faced political unrest in 2014 and 2015 after the ‘wiretapping
scandal’, with the opposition ‘accusing the VMRO-DPMNE of spying on citizens and government officials anddemanding new elections’. Global Intake states that 2015 saw significant clashes between government forces andethnic Albanian militants; the opposition stated these incidents were ‘a provocation intended to rebuild support
for the government’ (160).
The Bertelsmann Stiftung reports that ‘there are no visible active organizations, private militias or vigilante groups
advocating racist or xenophobic agendas or threatening the political and social stability of the country’s transition
to democracy’ (161).
The same source indicates that there are several challenges and potential threats – organised crime groups operating
in northern and western former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, or the radical fundamentalists who joined theIslamic State (IS) (162).
The US Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) indicates that the 9-10 May 2015 incidents in Kumanovo wereregarded by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s government as an act of terrorism. The source says thecountry’s police carried out an operation in the city of Kumanovo to recover stolen equipment, as in April an ‘armed
group of approximately 40 people seized weapons, ammunition, and radio communication supplies from a borderpolice station in Goshince near the border with Kosovo.’ Eight police officers and 10 members of the armed groups
were killed in the operation, the source reported (163).
The Global IntAKE (AKE) also emphasised that there was ‘still a long-term risk that ethnic divisions could once again
resurface and express themselves through armed conflict’ (164). The AKE said a hardcore element of Albanian insurgent
groups remained committed to separation and insurgency. However, such groups are not deemed a big threat tostability and their attacks are likely to be isolated and on a small scale (165).
The threat of terrorism to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is low and the country has not been subject
to an explicit threat from Islamist fundamentalist groups, said AKE in its analysis (166).
Regarding civil unrest, AKE noted that ‘poverty, unemployment, political dissatisfaction and ethnic tensions are themain reasons for protest and unrest in the country (167), and generally, in areas with a large ethnic Albanian population,
the political and economic problems become more acute with ethnic divisions (168).
Both AKE and OSAC stated that demonstrations, protests or rallies were generally peaceful but pose a significant
risk of turning violent.

(158) Global Intake, Macedonia – Overview, Summary, n.d.
(159) Republic of Macedonia, Framework Agreement Concluded at Ohrid, Macedonia, Signed at Skopje, Macedonia, 13 August 2001.
(160) Global Intake, Macedonia – Overview, Summary, n.d.
(161) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(162) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(163) OSAC, Macedonia 2016 Crime & Safety Report, 2016.
(164) AKE, Macedonia – Security Risk Profile, last updated 21 June 2016.
(165) AKE, Macedonia – Security Risk Profile, last updated 21 June 2016.
(166) AKE, Macedonia – Security Risk Profile, last updated 21 June 2016.
(167) AKE, Macedonia – Political Risk Profile, last updated 26 July 2016.
(168) AKE, Macedonia – Security Risk Profile, last updated 21 June 2016.

28 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

The OSAC indicates that in 2015 there were 81 reported demonstrations, the majority of which were anti-government
rallies. Occasionally the protests turned violent, causing damage and injuries to police and demonstrators in
Skopje (169). The use of rubber bullets against protesters is permitted under law but the authorities tend to favourarrests and dispersal rather than the use of bullets or tear gas (170).

(169) OSAC, Macedonia 2016 Crime & Safety Report, 2016.
(170) AKE, Macedonia – Security Risk Profile, last updated 21 June 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 29

5.	 Human rights situation
5.1.	Legal context
The constitution guarantees fundamental human rights, including freedom of thought and expression, religion,
movement, association, peaceful assembly, and respect for civil rights (171).
The country has ratified the core international human rights instruments: the International Convention on the
Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention Against Torture, the Convention on the Rights of
the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (172).
In August 2015, the UN Human Rights Committee acknowledged the positive steps achieved in the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia, namely the adoption of national legislation and the ratification of international human rights
instruments. However, the committee indicated a series of concerns and recommendations regarding the role of
the Ombudsman, issues of sexual orientation and gender identity, Roma, women and children, police brutality,
conditions of detention, or freedom of movement, expression, association and assembly (173).
The 2016 European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) report emphasised that the provisions of
the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s Criminal Code generally reflected most of ECRI’s recommendations
concerning national legislation to combat racism and racial discrimination. However, the source adds, various gaps
remain, such as article 319 of the Criminal Code which criminalises incitement to national, racial or religious hatred,
discord and intolerance, but does not include sexual orientation and gender identity (174).
In 2015, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) received 340 complaints regarding the former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia of which 328 were considered inadmissible or were excluded. The Court judged 12 cases and on 11 of
those at least one violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was found (175).
Civil Rights Defenders indicates that, in general, the country ‘falls short when it comes to implementing reforms
and human rights standards’ (176).
According to the EC Communication 2016, although the country’s legal framework is generally in line with European
standards, further efforts ‘are needed in practice to ensure the respect of human rights of vulnerable groups’ (177).

5.2.	General human rights situation
5.2.1. Freedom of expression
According to the EC’s Communication 2016, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia shows ‘some level of
preparation’ regarding freedom of expression, although the current political climate (see 1.3.2 Government) has
put the media under serious pressure (178).
The EC IPA II chapter on civil society and media programme 2014-2015 indicates that there was ‘political interferencein the media through government advertising policies and various forms of violation of freedom of expression’ in
the country, that include:‘Self-censorship, imprisonment of journalists, rise of the internet media and survival of print and electronic media,
media politicisation and clientelism, poor labour standards of journalists, implementation of media legislation, the(171) Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, 1991 amended 2011, art. 9-29.
(172) UN Human Rights, OHC, Status of Verification, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, updated at least every six months.
(173) UN, Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations on the third periodic report of the FYRoM, 17 August 2015.
(174) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(175) ECtHR, Press country Profile, “The FYRoM”, last updated October 2016.
(176) Civil Rights Defenders, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(177) EC, Communication on EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.
(178) EC, Communication on EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.

30 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

work of the regulator and of the Public Service Broadcaster, the judiciary’s role in freedom of expression, increase
number of defamation cases, the work of media CSOs, training of journalists, the works of journalists’ associations
and self-regulation, media literacy, investigative production, minority media and media dialogue’ (179).
The Bertelsman Stiftung reports that although the legal framework protecting freedom of speech is safeguarded
under the constitution, ‘mainstream media tended to report only favourably on the government’s activities’ (180).
Reports without Borders, in the 2016 World Press Freedom Index, indicated that media freedoms have dramaticallyworsened in former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in recent years (181).
According to Freedom House, the media is subject to political pressure and harassment. The source adds that media
outlets are divided along ethnic lines (182).
Civil Rights Defenders reports a steady decrease in freedom of expression in recent years, whereby there is a growing
trend of control and pressure by the government that results in self-censorship and biased reporting (183).

5.2.2. Freedom of religion
The 2015 US DoS report on human rights practices in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia indicate that thecountry’s constitution prohibits religious discrimination and guarantees freedom of religion and religious expression,and equality before the law for all individuals regardless of religious belief (184).
According to Civil Rights Defenders, freedom of thought, conscience and religion is generally respected in the
country, ‘but separation between church and state remains a problem’, which was especially visible in 2015 when
the Government provided millions of euros in funding to build an Orthodox Church in Skopje (185).

5.2.3. Freedom of association and assembly
According to the US DoS report, the law guarantees freedom of association and the Government generally respects
this right (186). The same source indicates that the law guarantees freedom of assembly, and the right is generally
respected, although there were reports of some government interference, revealed during the ‘wiretapping scandal’(talks between the MoI and the prime minister’s chief of staff in which the minister promised to ‘direct traffic police
to prevent five buses full of protesters traveling from the city of Prilep from reaching Skopje to participate in ananti-government protest’) (187).
Civil Rights Defenders indicates that ‘the law provides for the right to freedom of association, and the government
generally respected the right’ (188). The same source indicates that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ‘faces
a difficult situation, where many NGOs are struggling to survive at a time when scrutiny of government transparency
and accountability is as important as ever’. The source adds that political pressure has increased in recent years,‘making the media and the NGOs less inclined to criticise the government’ (189).
The Bertelsmann Stiftung states that civil society in the country has been under severe pressure to follow theGovernment’s policies since VMRO-DPMNE was elected in 2006 (190).

(179) EC, IPA II 2014-2020, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Civil Society Facility and Media Programme 2014-2015, 2015.
(180) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016(181) RSF, World Press Freedom Index 2016, 2016.
(182) FH, Nations in Transit 2016 - Macedonia, 12 April 2016(183) Civil Rights Defenders, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015(184) US DoS, 2015 Report on International Religious Freedom - Macedonia, 10 August 2016.
(185) CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(186) US DoS, 2015 Human Rights Report, BiH, 13 April 2016.
(187) US DoS, 2015 Human Rights Report, BiH, 13 April 2016.
(188) CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(189) CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated October 2015.
(190) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 31

According to CIVICUS, a global alliance of civil-society organisations, in 2015 the Government addressed a ‘systematic
campaign to suppress and persecute critical voices’ and conducted a ‘mass surveillance operation that targeted
opposition politicians and civil society activists’. Those ‘led to protests which were met heavy-handedly by the police,
including excessive violence and illegal detentions’ (191).

5.2.4. Torture and other cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment and punishment
According to the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment (CPT), the legal framework governing the deprivation of liberty by the police is outlined in the 2006
Law on Police and the 2010 Criminal Procedure Code (192).
The source adds that, although the majority of the interviewees reported no complaints regarding police treatment
while in custody, credible allegations of ill-treatment by police officers were also registered, such as trying to extract
confessions or information relevant to ongoing investigations, or verbal abuse towards Roma (193).
See also 5.2.5 Detention.

5.2.5. Detention
The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT)
reports that most of the visited police stations had ‘substandard’ material conditions and the detention facilities hadserious shortcomings. Despite the frequent warnings from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s Ombudsman
regarding those shortcomings, the CPT indicates that no improvements have been made (194).
Reporting after the visit to several prison facilities, the CPT indicates that although some progress was achieved by
the country in the strategy to reform the prison system, ‘no fundamental improvements were observed’ in 2014
compared to 2010 and 2011. According to the source, the situation had deteriorated further (195).
According to Civil Rights Defenders, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia has done little to improve thesituation in prisons and pre-detention facilities. It noted that more than 200 complaints were sent to the Office ofOmbudsman regarding excessive use of force by the police in the prison system. However only one police officer
has been convicted (196).
In its 2015 human rights report, the Ombudsman indicated that:‘Overcrowding, insufficient healthcare protection and weak supply of the institutions with medicaments andpoor hygiene and accommodation conditions as well as the low quality diet of the convicts and the detained
persons have been determined in most of the penitentiary and correctional facilities thereby violating the rightsof the persons deprived of liberty as well as their human dignity’ (197).
The same source adds that, although some measures have been undertaken by the competent authorities, thesituation of the prison system did not change (198).

(191) CIVICUS, Civil Society Watch Report, June 2016.
(192) CoE, CPT, Report to the Government of “the FYRoM” on the visit to “the FYRoM” 7-17 October 2014, 17 March 2016.
(193) CoE, CPT, Report to the Government of “the FYRoM” on the visit to “the FYRoM” 7-17 October 2014, 17 March 2016.
(194) CoE, CPT, Report to the Government of “the FYRoM” on the visit to “the FYRoM” 7-17 October 2014, 17 March 2016.
(195) CoE, CPT, Report to the Government of “the FYRoM” on the visit to “the FYRoM” 7-17 October 2014, 17 March 2016.
(196) CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(197) Ombudsman (The), Annual Report on the Degree of Provision, Respect, Advancement and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms 2015, March 2016.
(198) Ombudsman (The), Annual Report on the Degree of Provision, Respect, Advancement and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms 2015, March 2016.

32 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

5.3.	Specific groups
5.3.1. Ethnic minorities / Inter-ethnic relations
The EC Communication 2016 indicates that ‘the inter-ethnic situation remained fragile’ in the country. Additionally,
the Communication states that ‘the review of the Ohrid Framework Agreement, which ended the 2001 conflict andprovides the framework for the inter-ethnic relations, still needs to be completed in a transparent and inclusive
manner (199).
The European Commission against Racism states that although the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia adopted
most of the Commission’s recommendations to combat racism and racial discrimination under the Criminal Code (200),
namely in article 319, which criminalises incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, discord and intolerance,
serious gaps remain (201). The same source points out that the country’s legislation does not criminalise ‘the creationor leadership of a group which promotes racism; support for such a group; and participation in its activities’ (202). The
Commission against Racism indicates that hate speech is legally prohibited (foreseen in the Law on Political Parties
and the Law on Associations and Foundations), but its application in practice is ‘extremely weak’ (203).
In its 2015 report, Civil Rights Defenders indicated that inter-ethnic tension between ethnic Albanian and Macedoniangroups has been constant since the armed conflict in 2001, with numerous reported cases of ethnically motivatedviolence. As an example, the source reports the case of an Albanian student who, in May 2014, was arrested on
suspicion of murdering a Macedonian student, which caused two days of unrest and ethnic riots in Skopje. The
CRD adds that impunity for war crimes and crimes against humanity remain a serious hamper in the reconciliation
process between two ethnic groups (204).
The ECRI report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia indicates that ‘there are numerous examples ofnegative stereotyping in the media against both of the two main ethnic groups in the country and, to a somewhat
lesser extent, against smaller groups’ (205).
The same source adds that despite the existence of several other minority groups in the country, such as Turks(3.9 %), Roma (2.7 %), Serbs (1.8 %), Bosnians (0.8 %) and Vlachs (0.5 %), the Government has no general strategy
for these groups but an uncoordinated plan for promoting their integration. Despite the adoption of a legislative
framework for civil service and public employment in 2014, aimed at streamlining ‘the recruitment process forall ethnic communities and establish a data collection system that monitors ethnic distribution of public sector
employment’, implementation is lacking, and the minority communities are still underrepresented at central andlocal level (206).
The CoE’s Ad Hoc Committee of Experts on Roma and Traveller Issues (CAHROM) indicates that the lack of personal
documents (identity cards, birth certificates, medical insurance cards and employment cards) is one of the main
challenges faced by the Roma in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Consequently, it restricts thecommunity’s rights in many areas. According to the Committee:‘It can lead to individuals’ imprisonment in a vicious circle and exclusion, since persons without birth certificatesor of proof of nationality cannot obtain identity cards or other documents required for access to basic services
and, through a knock-on effect, the children of persons without such documentation often find themselves inthe same situation’ (207).

(199) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 22.
(200) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Criminal Code, 1 November 1996, amended 2009.
(201) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(202) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(203) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(204) Civil Rights Defenders, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015.
(205) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(206) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(207) CAHROM, Thematic Report Of The Group Of Experts On Roma Health Mediators, 22 June 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 33

In its 2016 report, ECRI refers to the difficult situation of the Roma community in the former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia (208). As mentioned, the new legislative framework for public employment adopted in 2014 should
ensure the rights of minorities in accessing public employment but it is still far from being fully implemented (209).
The authorities adopted the ‘Strategy for the Roma in Republic of Macedonia 2014-2020’ (210), focusing on social
inclusion through employment, housing, education, health and culture (211).
According to the Bertelsmann Stiftung, the Roma community is the most vulnerable group in the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia. Living in deep poverty and suffering from poor conditions, it faces widespread prejudice
and discrimination and is usually socially excluded (212).
The European Roma Rights Center (ERRC) expressed ongoing concern at the level of police brutality against Romain the country and the level of impunity regarding these cases. It is also concerned about housing – most Romani
live in segregated settlements – and the rate of poverty among the community, which is approximately 2.5 times
higher than the national level (213).

5.3.2. Journalists and media
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ranks 118th among 180 countries in the 2016 RSF World Press Freedom
index, the lowest-ranked country in the Western Balkans (214).
Freedom House ranked the country 136th on the list of 199 countries assessed on freedom of the press in 2016,a relevant decline compared to 125th place in 2015 (rank 1 being the best, 199 the worst). The source classified
the press freedom status of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia as ‘not free’, a relevant downturn whencompared to the ‘partially free’ status achieved in 2015 (215).
The source adds that such big drop is due to revelations indicating ‘large-scale and illegal government wiretappingof journalists, corrupt ties between officials and media owners, and an increase in threats and attacks on media
workers’ (216). For more information on the wiretapping case, see 1.3.2 Government.
According to the Association of Journalists of Macedonia (AJM), quoted by the IREX media sustainability index 2016,a ‘dozen attacks on journalists and media professionals’ occurred in the first half of 2016 alone and translated into:‘Verbal and physical assault, preventing journalists from reporting on events, destruction of their professional
equipment and personal property. The most serious incidents included unknown persons leaving a funereal
wreath at the front door of prominent journalist critical of the government, setting the car of another journalist
on fire and an attempt by a government minister to start a physical altercation with a pesky online journalist/
blogger’ (217).
The source adds that the media believes such threats or attacks originate from ‘members of the ruling political party,
whether acting alone or on orders by high-ranking party officials’, and such events ‘are never fully investigated orprosecuted’ (218).
According to the EC’s Communication 2015, ‘the revelations in the context of the wiretapping case have corroborated
earlier serious concerns […] over political interference in the judiciary and the media, increasing politicisation of state
institutions and the conduct of elections’, and the country ‘continued to backslide in this area’ (219).

(208) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(209) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(210) Government of the Republic of Macedonia, Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, Strategy for the Roma in Republic of Macedonia, 2014-2020, June 2014.
(211) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(212) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(213) ERRC, Written comments by the ERRC for Consideration by the EC concerning Roma Inclusion in the WB Progress Reports 2016, July 2016.
(214) RSF, World Press Freedom Index 2016, 2016.
(215) FH, Freedom of the Press 2016, April 2016; FH, Freedom of the Press 2015, April 2015.
(216) FH, Freedom of the Press 2016, April 2016.
(217) IREX, Macedonia, Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016, p. 82, 2016.
(218) IREX, Macedonia, Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016, p. 82, 2016.
(219) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Strategy 2015, 10 November 2015, p. 14.

34 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

The EC’s Communication 2016 indicates that, despite ‘some level of preparation’, the country’s ‘freedom of expression
and the situation of the media remain a serious challenge in the current political climate’ (220).

5.3.3. Human rights and peace defenders
According to CRD, the human rights defenders’ situation in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is ‘unfavourable
due to public defamation campaigns against organisations funded or supported from abroad who are often branded
as “traitors”, “mercenaries” and “spies” in the media and by pro-Government activists’. The source adds that suchcampaigns are generally ‘carried out through Government-controlled media’ (221).
CIVICUS reported that, in 2015, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’s Government suppressed and persecuted‘critical voices’ and conducted surveillance operations targeting ‘opposition politicians and civil society activists’ (222).

5.3.4. Women
According to the US DoS human rights report, the constitution and the law prohibit discrimination based on age,gender, race, disability, language, and ethnic, social, or political affiliation and the Government generally enforces
this (223).
The 2015 former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Ombudsman’s report indicates that although the existing framework
foresees the protection of the rights of women and children, there are still problems regarding the right to a financial
income, healthcare protection, education, and rights of children with disabilities (224).
According to the US DoS human rights report on the participation of women in public life ‘there were 42 women in
the 123-seat parliament; however, only one woman served on the 26-member Council of Ministers. The law requires
gender diversity in each political party’s candidate list, and no more than two-thirds of a party’s candidates may be
the same gender. Some 60 percent of judges were women, but only four of the country’s 81 mayors were women.
Leadership within political parties continued to be dominated by men’ (225).
Domestic violence is still prevalent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Although legislation protecting
women’s rights is in place, it lacks implementation (226).
According to Kvinna till Kvinna, a Swedish organisation supportive of women’s rights in the Western Balkans, thecountry’s ‘transition process to a more equal society has also been extremely slow’ (227).
According to the same source, although gender discrimination is prohibited under the constitution, ‘strong
patriarchal values still dominate, making it impossible for women to participate in society on the same terms as men.
Discrimination in the labour market, gender-based violence and a lack of time due to extensive family commitments,
as well as expectations to perform unpaid work, are just some of the obstacles that women face‘ (228).

5.3.5. Children
According to UNICEF, disabled children face specific challenges in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia andthe Government recently developed and implemented a deinstitutionalisation process (229).
ROMA S.O.S., an NGO focused on the protection of Roma rights, in a report on cohabitation between minors andwith a minor in the Roma community, recommends:(220) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016, p. 23.
(221) CRD, Human Rights in Macedonia, updated October 2015.
(222) CIVICUS, Civil Society Watch Report, June 2016.
(223) US DoS, 2015 Human Rights Report, BiH, 13 April 2016.
(224) Ombudsman (The), Annual Report 2015, March 2016.
(225) US DoS, 2015 Human Rights Report, BiH, 13 April 2016.
(226) US DoS, 2015 Human Rights Report, BiH, 13 April 2016.
(227) Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation, Macedonia, Women’s situation, last updated 7 September 2016.
(228) Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation, Macedonia, Women’s situation, last updated 7 September 2016.
(229) UNICEF, Assessment of alternative forms of care and family support services for children with disabilities, December 2015.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 35

• Harmonisation of the ‘existing legislation in order to explicitly ensure that the minimum legal age is 18 fora person to live in marital community, and ensuring legal mechanisms/procedures of the competent institutions
in order to act as it is a crime’;• Developing of a ‘special program for protection and prevention of marriage of persons under the age of18, ‘conducting campaigns to sensitize the negative effects of marriage, and in particular for the rights anddevelopment of the girls’;• Creating an ’institutional system for registering and monitoring of marriages between and with persons under
18 years in order to estimate the number and to undertake coordinated activities to eliminate this practice’ (230).
According to the EC 2015 Communication, although the legal framework for the protection of human rights is broadly
in line with European standards, […] implementation is lacking, in particular in the areas of Roma integration, rightsof the child and persons with disabilities (231).

5.3.6. LGBTI
According to ECRI, in recent years hate speech against LGBT persons in the media, on the Internet and on social media
has become more frequent and has intensified. The use of homophobic language by politicians has also increased (232).
The Bertelsmann Stiftung reports that members of LGBT groups and activities are ‘often targets of physical violence,harassment and use of derogatory language, including from journalists and government representatives’ (233).
According to ILGA’s 2016 Annual Review, 2015 ‘began on a negative note, with the government’s attempt toconstitutionally define marriage as a union between men and women only. An additional constitutional amendment
to make the passage of any future civil union legislation for same-sex couples more difficult was another source ofdisappointment, especially as it was introduced at the last minute, without informed debate’ (234).
ILGA adds that ‘hate crimes against LGBTI people remain a concern; the apparent lack of a systematic response toviolent attacks was pointed out by the European Commission and led LGBTI activists to protest on the streets during
the summer’ (235).
In January 2015, the perpetrator of a violent attack against two LGBTI activists in 2012 was sentenced to 7 months
imprisonment’, although the decision was later annulled and an appeal is pending, the same source reports (236).
ILGA, quoting the ‘Sexual and Health Rights of Marginalized Communities’, reports ‘two cases of assault based on
sexual orientation and one case of violence based on gender identity in 2015; two of these cases were pending at
the end of the year’ (237).
According to the EC Communication 2015, ‘the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) community
continues to suffer from discrimination and homophobic media content’; the EC’s 2016 Communication indicatesthat in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ‘the most marginalised categories of the population are still not
being accorded full protection’ (238).

5.3.7. Trafficked persons
The US DoS 2016 Trafficking in Persons report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia reads that:‘Women and girls in Macedonia are subjected to sex trafficking and forced labor within the country in restaurants,
bars, and nightclubs. Children, primarily Roma, are subjected to forced begging and sex trafficking through forced
marriages. Foreign victims subjected to sex trafficking in Macedonia typically originate from Eastern Europe,(230) Roma S.O.S., The Gray Area between Tradition and Children’s Rights!, February 2016.
(231) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Strategy 2015, 10 November 2015, p. 22.
(232) CoE, ECRI, Report on the FYRoM, 7 June 2016.
(233) Bertelsmann Stiftung, BTI 2016, Macedonia Country Report, 2016.
(234) ILGA, Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of LGBTI People in Europe 2016, May 2016.
(235) ILGA, Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of LGBTI People in Europe 2016, May 2016.
(236) ILGA, Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of LGBTI People in Europe 2016, May 2016.
(237) ILGA, Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of LGBTI People in Europe 2016, May 2016.
(238) EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Strategy 2015, 10 November 2015, p. 22; EC, Communication on the EU Enlargement Policy 2016, 9 November 2016,p. 23.

36 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

particularly Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Romania, Serbia, and Ukraine. Citizens of Macedonia andforeign victims transiting Macedonia are subjected to sex trafficking and forced labor in construction and agricultural
sectors in Southern, Central, and Western Europe. Migrants and refugees traveling through Macedonia are vulnerable
to trafficking, particularly women and unaccompanied minors. Traffickers frequently bribe police and labor inspectors.
Police have been investigated and convicted for complicity in human trafficking’ (239).
The US DoS further adds that the country’s government has made ‘significant efforts’ to ‘meet the minimum standards
for the elimination of trafficking’, although the objective has not been achieved yet (240).
In December 2012, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia adopted the National Strategy (and Action Plan)
for Combating Trafficking in Human and Illegal Migration in the Republic of Macedonia 2013-2016 (241), aimed at
establishing ‘preventive measures addressing the causes for human trafficking and work with vulnerable groups ina bid to eliminate’ the phenomenon (242).
Following a visit to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia by Madina Jarbussynova, OSCE’s Special Representativeand Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings, several needs were identified and recommendations
made in regards to the country’s national strategy and action plan 2013-2016 for combatting trafficking in humanbeings, namely:• Ratify, amend or improve the existing legal framework;• Enhance prevention of child trafficking through child protection measures;• Enhance identification and prevention of trafficking;• Enhance assistance and protection of victims of human trafficking;• Enhance the criminal justice response to all forms of human trafficking (243).

5.3.8. Returnees
According to Suzana Bornarova, assistant professor in the Institute for Social Work and Social Policy of the Ss.
Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, several events caused large flows of migration over the years, forcing
Macedonians to leave their country in the transition period of the 1990s, due to ‘unfavourable socio-economic
conditions, deteriorating living standards, rising poverty and unemployment’ (244).
Marjan Petreski, associate professor in the School of Business Economics and Management and Vice-Rector of
Research at the University American College Skopje and Economics and Management, writes that the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia had more than 626,000 emigrants abroad at the end of 2013, an emigration rate above 30 %of the country’s population (245). The author indicates that the number of returnees to the country increased throughvoluntary and forced returns (246).
Bornarova states that the main challenges the returnees face after return include housing and finding a job. The
reintegration process is most difficult for those returnees who have stayed abroad for a long period and lost almost
all links to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The author indicates that without adequate adjustment to
the old-new environment, most of the returnees risk marginalisation and poverty (247).
Although the Resolution and Action Plan on Migration and the Agreement on the Status and Activities of the
Migration, Asylum and Refugees Regional Initiative was adopted in 2009, its implementation is weak due to thelack of funding, leading Bornarova to conclude that there has been no official policy designed to regulate migratory
movements and assist returning migrants (248).

(239) US DoS, 2016 Trafficking in Persons Report, Macedonia, June 2016, pp. 250-251.
(240) US DoS, 2016 Trafficking in Persons Report, Macedonia, June 2016, pp. 250-251.
(241) Government of Macedonia, National Strategy for Combating Trafficking in Human and Illegal Migration in the Republic of Macedonia 2013-2016, 2012.
(242) Government of Macedonia, National strategy to combat human trafficking and illegal migration promoted, 2 December 2012.
(243) OSCE, Report by OSCE Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings, 7 July 2016, pp. 10-12.
(244) Bornarova, S., Returning migrants in the Republic of Macedonia: The issue of reintegration, January 2011.
(245) Petreski, M., Does return Migration Affect Health Outcomes in Macedonia?, May 2016.
(246) Petreski, M., Does return Migration Affect Health Outcomes in Macedonia?, May 2016.
(247) Bornarova, S., Returning migrants in the Republic of Macedonia: The issue of reintegration, January 2011.
(248) Bornarova, S., Returning migrants in the Republic of Macedonia: The issue of reintegration, January 2011.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 37

According to OIM’s 2015 report on Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes, between 2011 and 2014, the organisation
assisted 8,746 voluntary returnees to go back to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. In the framework of
OIM’s Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes, the returnees receive support for housing, health care, education,
vocational training and establishment of small businesses (249).

(249) IOM, Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes, 2015; Bornarova, S., Returning migrants in the Republic of Macedonia: The issue of reintegration, January2011.

38 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Bibliography
ACEEEO (Association of European Election Officials), Elections in Europe, Development of Electoral Systems in Central
and Eastern Europe since 1991, 2016, pp. 190-202, (http://aceeeo.org/sites/default/files/PDF/elections/JB16-en-low.
pdf), accessed 27 October 2016.
Agency for Audio and Audiovisual Media Services, n.d., (http://www.avmu.mk/index.php?option=com_content&v
iew=article&id=1160&Itemid=32&lang=en), accessed 28 October 2016.
Agency for Electronic Communications, n.d., (http://www.aek.mk/en/), accessed 28 October 2016.
AI (Amnesty International), Amnesty International Report 2015/16 - Macedonia, 24 February 2016 (https://www.
amnesty.org/en/countries/europe-and-central-asia/macedonia/report-macedonia), accessed 5 July 2016.
Analytica [website], Assessing the Oversight Mechanisms of the Police Forces in Macedonia, December 2015,(http://www.analyticamk.org/images/2016/04/05/oversight_brief_train_67a8c.pdf), accessed 27 October 2016.
Army of the Republic of Macedonia, Defense Structure, n.d., (http://www.arm.mil.mk/baza/struktura/en_struktura.
html), accessed 27 October 2016.
Assembly of the Republic of Macedonia,
Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia, (http://www.sobranie.mk/the-constitution-of-the-republic-ofmacedonia.nspx) accessed 23 August 2016.
Members of Parliament, Current structure 2014-2018, (http://www.sobranie.mk/current-structure-2014-2018.
nspx), accessed 27 October 2016.
Members of Parliament, last update 27 January 2016, (http://www.sobranie.mk/election-results-2014.nspx),
accessed 28 October 2016.
Balkan Insight,
Hahn brokers deal ending crisis in Macedonia, 15 July 2015 (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/macedoniawarring-leaders-struck-crisis-deal), accessed 31 August 2016.
Macedonia-Greece Name Dispute: What’s in a name?, 30 June 2011 (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/
background-what-s-in-a-name) accessed 23 August 2016.
Macedonia Opposition MPs Return to Parliament, 1 September 2015, (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/
macedonia-opposition-returns-to-parliament-08-31-2015), accessed 14 October 2016.
Macedonia PM Rallies Supporters after Wiretap Scandal, 15 March 2015, (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/
article/macedonia-s-embattled-pm-stands-resilient-before-party-faithful), accessed 13 October 2016.
Macedonia President Revokes all controversial pardons, 06 June 2016 (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/
macedonia-president-fully-withdraws-pardons-06-06-2016) accessed 1 September 2016.
Macedonian elections set for December, 1 September 2016 (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/
macedonia-decides-to-hold-elections-on-december-11-08-31-2016) accessed 2 September 2016.
BBC [website], Macedonia profile – Media, 19 May 2015, (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17551488),
accessed 28 October 2016.
Bogdanovski, Andreja, Peacekeeping Contributor Profile: The Republic of Macedonia, August 2014, in:Providingforpeacekeeping.org [website], (http://www.providingforpeacekeeping.org/2014/09/02/peacekeepingcontributor-profile-the-republic-of-macedonia/), accessed 27 October 2016.
Bornarova, Suzana, ’Returning migrants in the Republic of Macedonia: The issue of reintegration’, in: Dve domovini/ Two Homelands, January 2011, pp. 127-136, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291531349_Returning_
migrants_in_the_republic_of_Macedonia_The_issue_of_reintegration), accessed 21 August 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 39

BTI (Bertelsmann Stiftung), Macedonia Country Report, 2016 (http://www.bti-project.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/
Downloads/Reports/2016/pdf/BTI_2016_Macedonia.pdf), accessed 3 August 2016.
CIA (Central Intelligence Agency),
The World Factbook Macedonia, last updated 27 October 2016, (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook/geos/mk.html), accessed 28 October 2016.
The World Factbook, Macedonia, Military and Security, last updated 3 August 2016, (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/mk.html), accessed 27 October 2016.
CIVICUS, Civil Society Watch Report, June 2016, (http://www.civicus.org/images/CSW_Report.pdf), accessed
28 October 2016.
Coalition of civil associations “All for Fair Trials”, NGOs and the judiciary - watch dog activities, interactions,collaboration, communication, Country Report, Republic of Macedonia, 2015, (http://all4fairtrials.org.mk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/Macedonia-country-report-ENG.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
CoE (Council of Europe),
CAHROM (Ad Hoc Committee Of Experts On Roma And Traveller Issues), Thematic Report Of The Group Of Experts
On Roma Health Mediators (following the CAHROM thematic visit to Sofia, Bulgaria on 2-4 November 2015),
22 June 2016, (http://coe-romed.org/sites/default/files/documentation/CAHROM%20(2016)7%20EN%20
Thematic%20report%20on%20Roma%20health%20mediators.pdf), accessed 7 November 2016.
ECRI (European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance), ECRI Report on “The Former Yugoslav Republic
Of Macedonia, (fifth monitoring cycle), adopted 18 March 2016, 7 June 2016, (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/
monitoring/ecri/country-by-country/former_yugoslav_republic_macedonia/MKD-CbC-V-2016-021-ENG.pdf),
accessed 2 August 2016.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Electoral Code of the Former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia (consolidated version as of November 2015), CDL-REF(2016)020, 24 February 2016, (http://
www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-REF(2016)020-e), accessed 28 October 2016.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Legislation related to the Disciplinary
Liability of Judges - Law on the courts and Law on Judicial Council (consolidated version with draft amendments of2015); Law on the Council for Determination of the Facts of and Initiation of Disciplinary procedure for Establishing
Disciplinary Responsibility of a Judge (Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia, no. 20 from 12.02.2015),(http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-REF(2015)046-e), accessed 28 October 2016.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Opinion on the Laws on the Disciplinary
Liability and Evaluation of Judges of “The Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia”, 21 December 2015,(http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2015)042-e), accessed
28 October 2016.
CPT (European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment),
Report to the Government of “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”on the visit to “the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia” carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 7 to 17 October 2014, 17 March 2016 (http://www.cpt.coe.int/
documents/mkd/2016-08-inf-eng.pdf), accessed 2 August 2016.
GRECO (Group of States against corruption), Evaluation Report The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
Fourth Evaluation Round, Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges andprosecutors, 17 March 2014 (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/greco/evaluations/round4/Eval%20IV/
GrecoEval4(2013)4_TheFYROMacedonia_EN.pdf), accessed 4 August 2016.
CRD (Civil Rights Defenders), Human Rights in Macedonia, updated in October 2015 (https://www.civilrightsdefenders.
org/country-reports/human-rights-in-macedonia), accessed 3 August 2016.
DW (Deutsche Welle), Macedonia parties agree on election date in December, 31 August 2016, (http://www.dw.com/
en/macedonia-parties-agree-on-election-date-in-december/a-19517204), accessed 13 October 2016.

40 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005-2015,
PROGRESS REPORT 2013, Macedonia, (http://www.romadecade.org/cms/upload/file/9762_file8_mk-2013.pdf),
accessed 5 August, 2016.
PROGRESS REPORT 2014, Macedonia, (http://www.romadecade.org/cms/upload/file/9811_file9_mk-2014.pdf),
accessed 5 August, 2016.
EC (European Commission),
EC, Agreement in Skopje to overcome political crisis, 15 July 2015, (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/hahn/announcements/agreement-skopje-overcome-political-crisis_en), accessed 7 November 2016.
2 June Agreement, 19 June 2015, (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/news_corner/news/news-files/20150619_
agreement.pdf), accessed 13 October 2016.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Enlargement Strategy’, COM(2015) 611 final, 10 November 2015,(http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2015/20151110_strategy_paper_en.pdf), accessed
21 October 2016.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions, 2016 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy, COM(2016) 715
final, 9 November 2016, (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2016/20161109_strategy_
paper_en.pdf), accessed 10 November 2016.
European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia financial assistance under IPA II, n.d. (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/instruments/funding-by-country/
former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia/index_en.htm), accessed 13 october 2016.
Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) Indicative Strategy Paper for the FYRoM (2014-2020), 2014,(http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2014/20140919-csp-former-yugoslav-republic-ofmacedonia.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA II), 2014-2020, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Civil
Society Facility and Media Programme 2014-2015, 2014, (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/financial_assistance/ipa/2015/multi-country/ipa_ii_2014-031-605.04_2015-037-653.04-csf-and-media-the_former_
yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia.pdf), accessed 13 October 2016.
Instrument of Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) 2014-2020, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
Support to the Justice Sector, 2014, (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_
macedonia/ipa/2015/ipa_2014_037701_037706.3_the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia_country_
action_programme_justice.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Johannes Hahn, Statement, Agreement in Skopje to overcome political crisis, 15 July 2015, (https://ec.europa.
eu/commission/2014-2019/hahn/announcements/agreement-skopje-overcome-political-crisis_en), accessed
13 October 2016.
Statement following today’s mission of Commissioner Hahn to former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
2 June 2015, (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-15-5106_en.htm), accessed 13 October 2016.
The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Progress Report, October 2014, (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/
pdf/key_documents/2014/20141008-the-former-yugoslav-republic-of-macedonia-progress-report_en.pdf),
accessed 5 July 2016.
Urgent Reform Priorities for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, June 2015, (http://ec.europa.
eu/enlargement/news_corner/news/news-files/20150619_urgent_reform_priorities.pdf), accessed
10 November 2016.
ERRC (European Roma Rights Centre), Written comments by the European Roma Rights Centre for Consideration by theEuropean Commission concerning Roma Inclusion in the Western Balkans Progress Reports 2016 (http://www.errc.org/
cms/upload/file/ec-submission-on-roma-inclusion-in-the-western-balkans-july-2016.pdf), accessed 4 August 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 41

EurActiv,
Macedonia’s EU aspirations in jeopardy, 25 May 2016 (https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/news/
macedonias-eu-aspirations-in-jeopardy/) accessed 09 August 2016.
Macedonia postpones election under EU pressure, 19 May 2016 (http://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/
news/macedonia-postpones-election-under-eu-pressure/) accessed 09 August 2016.
European Court of Auditors, Special Report, Strengthening administrative capacity in the former Yugoslav Republicof Macedonia: limited progress in a difficult context, June 2016, (http://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/
SR16_11/SR16_11_EN.pdf), accessed 14 October 2016.
ECtHR (European Court of Human Rights), “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, Press country profile, last
updated October 2016, (http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/CP_The_former_Yugoslav_Republic_of_Macedonia_
ENG.pdf), accessed 27 October 2016.
European Forum for Democracy and Solidarity, FYR Macedonia, last update 17 March 2016 (http://www.
europeanforum.net/uploads/countries/pdf/fyr_macedonia.pdf), accessed 2 August 2016.
FH (Freedom House),
Freedom in the World 2016 - Macedonia, 2016 (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2016/
macedonia) accessed 5 July 2016.
Nations in Transit 2016 - Macedonia, 12 April 2016 (https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2016/
macedonia), accessed 5 July 2016.
Freedom of the Press 2015, April 2015, (https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FreedomofthePress_2015_
FINAL.pdf), accessed 27 October 2016.
Freedom of the Press 2016, April 2016, (https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FOTP2016Report_
Final_04232016-EMBARGOED.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Foundation Robert Schuman, European Elections Monitor, The authorities in office are due to strengthen their power
after the presidential and legislative elections in Macedonia, 13 April 2014, (http://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/doc/oee/oee-1489-en.pdf), accessed 13 October 2016.
Friedrich Naumann Stiftung, Macedonia, n.d., (http://www.fnf-southeasteurope.org/fnf-in-southeast-europe/
macedonia/), accessed 12 October 2016.
Global Intake, Macedonia – Overview, Summary, n.d., (http://www.globalintake.com/gisecure/global_intake.
php?Macedonia-id187-sec10.html), accessed 28 October 2016.
Global Security, Macedonia – Politics, n.d., (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/europe/mk-politics.htm)
accessed 5 October 2016.
Globsec.org [website], Globesec 2015, Gjorge Ivanov, n.d., (http://www.globsec.org/globsec2015/panellist/gjorgeivanov), accessed 13 October 2016.
Government of the Republic of Macedonia,
Criminal Code, (consolidated version with the amendments from March 2004, June 2006, January 2008 and
September 2009), 1 November 1996, available at: (http://www.legislationline.org/documents/action/popup/
id/16066/preview), accessed 7 November 2016.
Criminal Procedure Law, Official gazette No. 150 from 18 November 2010, (OSCE Unofficial translation in English),art. 5, available at: Legislationonline.org, (http://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes),accessed 28 October 2016.
Framework Agreement Concluded at Ohrid, Macedonia, Signed at Skopje, Macedonia, 13 August 2001, available
at: (http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/the_former_yugoslav_republic_of_macedonia/framework_
agreement_ohrid_130801_en.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.

42 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Government of Republic of Macedonia [official website], n.d., (http://vlada.mk/?language=en-gb), accessed
13 October 2016.
Law on Courts (“Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” nos. 58/2006, 62/2006, 35/2008 and 150/2010).
Consolidated Text, Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Macedonia U. no. 256/2007 dated
16 April 2008, published in the “Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no. 61/2008, U. no. 74/2008 dated
10 September 2008, published in the “Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no. 118/2008 and U. no.
124/2008 dated 14 January 2009, published in the “Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no. 16/2009,
and U. no. 12/2011 of 29 February 2012, published in the “Official Gazette of the Republic of Macedonia” no.
39/2012, available at: (http://www.legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/5953/file/fYROM_Law%20
on%20Courts_2012_en.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Ministries of the Government of the Republic of Macedonia, n.d., (http://vlada.mk/?q=node/353&language=engb), accessed 28 October 2016.
Ministry of Information Society and Administration, n.d., (http://www.mio.gov.mk/?q=node/2549), accessed
28 October 2016.
Ministry of Information Society and Administration, Public Administration Reform Strategy 2010-2015, Republic
Of Macedonia, 21 December 2010, (http://mioa.gov.mk/files/pdf/en/Strategija_za_RJA_en.pdf), accessed
14 October 2016.
Ministry of Interior, ‘Law on Police, Official Gazette 114/2006, 6/2009, 2009’, available at: Legislationonline[website], (www.legislationline.org/documents/id/17969), accessed 27 October 2016.
Ministry of Interior, Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA) 2015, 8 March 2016, available at:
OSCE, (http://polis.osce.org/library/f/5304/4889/OSCE-MKD-RPT-5304-EN-4889.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Ministry of Labour and Social Policy in collaboration with the National Coordinator of the Decade and Strategy
of Roma, Strategy for the Roma in Republic of Macedonia, 2014-2020, June 2014, (http://www.merc.org.mk/
Files/Write/Documents/02310/en/Roma-Strategy-in-Macedonia-2014-2020.pdf), accessed 7 November 2016.
National Strategy for Combating Trafficking in Human and Illegal Migration in the Republic of Macedonia 20132016, 2012, available at: (http://www.legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/5087/file/National%20
AT%20Strategy%202013-2016_en.pdf), accessed 14 November 2016.
Strategy for Cooperation of the Government with the Civil Society: 2012-2017, 2012, available in: gov2gov.
info [website], (http://www.gov2gov.info/uploads/library/1450261274_strategy-for-cooperation-of-thegovernment-with-the-civil-society--282012-2017-29.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia, The Constitutional Court int he Grip
between Political Interests and Human Rights, 2016, (http://www.mhc.org.mk/system/uploads/redactor_assets/
documents/1638/The_Constitutional_Court_26.07_web.pdf), accessed 4 August 2016.
HRW (Human Rights Watch), ‘As though We are not Human Beings’ – Police Brutality against migrants and Asylum
Seekers in Macedonia, 2015, (https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/macedonia0915_4up.pdf),
accessed 27 October 2016.
ICG (International Crisis Group),
Macedonia: Defusing the Bombs, 9 July 2015 (https://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/balkans/macedonia/b075-macedonia-defusing-the-bomb.aspx), accessed 5 July 2016.
Macedonia: Ten Years after the Conflict, 11 August 2011 (https://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/europe/
balkans/macedonia/212-macedonia-ten-years-after-the-conflict.aspx), accessed 5 July 2016.
ICNL (International Centre for Non-for-Profit Law), Law on Associations and Foundations, Official Gazette of Republic ofMacedonia, No. 52 as of April 16, 2010, (http://www.icnl.org/research/library/files/Macedonia/Assocs_Founds_eng.
pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 43

ILGA (International Lesbian and Gay Association),
Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe
2016, May 2016, (http://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/annual_review_2016-for_web.
pdf), accessed 7 November 2016.
Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe –2015, May 2015 (http://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/01_full_annual_review_updated.pdf), accessed
3 August 2016.
Independent Balkan News Agency, Gruevski resigns. Dimitriev appointed as new prime minister, 15 January 2016(http://www.balkaneu.com/gruevski-resigns-dimitriev-appointed-prime-minister/) accessed 1 September 2016.
INTERPOL (International Criminal Police Organisation), Members, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, n.d.,(https://www.interpol.int/Member-countries/Europe/Former-Yugoslav-Republic-of-Macedonia), accessed
27 October 2016.
IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union), The Former Yugoslav Republic Of Macedonia, Sobranie (Assembly of the Republic),
n.d., (http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2313_E.htm), accessed 27 October 2016.
IREX (International Research and Exchanges Board), Macedonia, Europe & Eurasia Media Sustainability Index 2016, p.
93, 2016, (https://www.irex.org/sites/default/files/pdf/media-sustainability-index-europe-eurasia-2016-macedonia.
pdf.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
ITU (International Telecommunications Union), TFYR Macedonia Profile, latest data 2015, (https://www.itu.int/net4/
itu-d/icteye/CountryProfileReport.aspx), accessed 28 October 2016.
Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame, Constitutional Reform: Ohrid Agreement,n.d (https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/provision/constitutional-reform-ohrid-agreement) accessed 22 August, 2016.
Legislationline.org [website], Constitutions, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (1991, amended 2011), (English version), n.d., (http://www.legislationline.org/
documents/section/constitutions/country/31), accessed 12 October 2016.
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), Relations with former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, last updated
7 April 2016 (http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_48830.htm), accessed 22 August 2016.
New York Times (The),
Europe, Macedonia Government Is Blamed for Wiretapping Scandal, 21 June 2015, (http://www.nytimes.
com/2015/06/22/world/europe/macedonia-government-is-blamed-for-wiretapping-scandal.html), accessed
13 October 2016.
Europe, Tiny Macedonia Confronts a Supersize Scandal, 14 May 2015, (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/15/
world/europe/tiny-macedonia-confronts-a-supersize-scandal.html), accessed 13 October 2016.
IOM (International Organisation for Migration), Assisted Voluntary Return Programmes, At a Glance 2015, 2015, (https://www.iom.int/sites/default/files/our_work/DMM/AVRR/AVRR-at-a-glance-2015.pdf), accessed 7 November 2016.
Kvinna till Kvinna Foundation, Macedonia, Women’s situation, last updated 7 September 2016, (http://kvinnatillkvinna.
se/en/what-we-do/), accessed 7 November 2016.
Ombudsman of the Republic of Macedonia,
Annual Report on the Degree of Provision Respect, Advancement and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms
2015, March 2016, (http://ombudsman.mk/upload/Godisni%20izvestai/GI-2015/GI%202015-Ang-za%20pecat.
pdf), accessed 7 November 2016.
Annual Report on the Level of Respect, Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms 2013, March
2014, (http://ombudsman.mk/upload/Godisni%20izvestai/GI-2013-Ang.pdf) accessed 12 August 2016.
Annual Report on the level of Respect, Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, 2014, March 2015,(http://ombudsman.mk/upload/Godisni%20izvestai/GI-2014/GI%202014-Ang.pdf) accessed 12 August 2016.

44 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Information for consideration to the Human Rights Committee in its adoption of a list of issues regarding theThird Periodical Report of the Republic of Macedonia under the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, July 2014, (http://www.ccprcentre.org/doc/2014/09/Contribution-of-the-Ombudsman.doc) accessed
12 August 2016.
Ombudsman of the Republic of Macedonia [official website], n.d., (http://ombudsman.mk/en/default.aspx),
accessed 27 October 2016.
OSAC, United States Department of State, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, Macedonia 2016 Crime & Safety Report,
26 January 2016 (https://www.osac.gov/Pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=18939), accessed 3 August 2016.
OSCE/ODIHR (Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human
Rights),Report by OSCE Special Representative and Co-ordinator for Combating Trafficking in Human Beings, Madina
Jarbussynova, following her visit to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 23-26 March 2015, 7 July 2016,(http://www.osce.org/secretariat/252936?download=true), accessed 14 November 2016.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - Early Parliamentary Elections, 5 June 2016, INTERIM REPORT - 31
March– 19 April 2016, 22 April 2016 (http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/fyrom/235701?download=true),accessed 5 July, 2016.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - Early Parliamentary Elections, 5 June 2016, INTERIM REPORT 2 20 April- 11 May 2016, 13 May 2016 (http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/fyrom/240061?download=true),accessed 5 July, 2016.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia - Early Parliamentary Elections scheduled for 5 June 2016, Final report,
8 July 2016 (http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/fyrom/251456?download=true) accessed 6 October 2016.
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Presidential and Early Parliamentary Elections, 13 and 27 April 2014,
OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission, Final Report, 15 July 2014, (http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/fyrom/121306?download=true), accessed 13 October 2016.
Petreski, Marjan, ’Does return Migration Affect Health Outcomes in Macedonia?’, Center for Economic Institutions
Working Paper Series, May 2016 (https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/rs/bitstream/10086/27955/1/wp2016-5.pdf),
accessed 21 August 2016
President of the Republic of Macedonia Dr Gjorge Ivanov [website], Biography, President of the Republic of Macedonia
Dr Gjorge Ivanov, n.d., (http://www.president.gov.mk/en/president/biography.html), accessed 13 October 2016.
Presidential Power [blog], Macedonia – Ruling party wins parliamentary election and presidential run-off, 13 April 2014,(http://presidential-power.com/?tag=gjorge-ivanov), accessed 13 October 2016.
Priebe, Reinhard et al, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Recommendations of the Senior Experts’ Groupon systemic Rule of Law issues relating to the communications interception revealed in Spring 2015, European
Commission (DG Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations), 8 June 2015, (http://ec.europa.eu/
enlargement/news_corner/news/news-files/20150619_recommendations_of_the_senior_experts_group.pdf)l,
accessed 27 October 2016.
Pointpulse [website], Macedonian Police, 2 June 2016, (http://pointpulse.net/magazine/macedonian-police/),
accessed 27 October 2016.
RFE/RL (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty),
Macedonian Political Parties Agree On Steps Toward Early Elections, July 21 2016 (http://www.rferl.org/content/
macedonia-political-parties-early-elections/27871837.html), accessed 8 August 2016.
Macedonian Parliament Rejects Move To Impeach President Ivanov, June 22 2016 (http://www.rferl.org/content/
macedonian-parliament-rejects-move-impeach-president-ivanov/27812625.html), accessed 8 August 2016.
RSF (Reporters without Borders), World Press Freedom Index 2016, 2016, (https://rsf.org/en/ranking#), accessed
27 October 2016.

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 45

Roma S.O.S. (Roma Organisation for Multicultural Affirmation), The Gray Area between Tradition and Children’s
Rights!, February 2016, available at: (https://www.unicef.org/tfyrmacedonia/STUDIJA_-_EN.PDF), accessed
7 November 2016.
SCPC (State Commission for the Prevention of Corruption),
Law on Prevention of Corruption with Amendments, 2002, (http://www.dksk.org.mk/en/images/stories/PDF/
law/law_on_prevention%20of_corrupt_on_2002.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
SCPC [official website], n.d., (http://www.dksk.org.mk/en/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=1),
accessed 28 October 2016.
State Programme for the Prevention and Repression of Corruption and Reduction of Conflict of Interest Action
Plan 2016 – 2019, December 2015, (http://www.dksk.org.mk/en/images/stories/PDF/stateprograme-eng-final.
pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
State Audit Office, n.d., (http://www.dzr.mk/en/DesktopDefault.aspx?tabindex=0&tabid=1), aceessed
28 october 2016.
State Election Commission, Early Parliamentary and Presidential Elections 2014, updated 9 May 2014, (http://rezultati.
sec.mk/Parliamentary/Results?cs=en-US&r=2&rd=r), accessed 28 October 2016.
Stratfor, Macedonia’s Tumultuous Year Ahead, Analysis, 30 December 2015 (https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/
macedonias-tumultuous-year-ahead), accessed 2 August 2016. TACSO (Technical Assistance for Civil Society
Organisations)/ SIPU International (Swedish Institute For Public Administration), Civil society organizations in
Macedonia, 2014, (http://www.tacso.org/doc/ipsos_report_mk.pdf), accessed 28 October 2016.
UN (United Nations),
Geospacial Information Section, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, August 2007, (http://www.un.org/
Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/macedonia.pdf), accessed 11 October 2016.
Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner, Status of Verification, the Former Yugoslav republic ofMacedonia, updated at least every six months, (http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/TreatyBodyExternal/Treaty.
aspx?CountryID=173&Lang=EN), accessed 28 October 2016.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Human Rights Committee, Concluding observations on thethird periodic report of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Adopted by the Committee at its 114th session(29 June–24 July 2015), 17 August 2015, (http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.
aspx?symbolno=CCPR/C/MKD/CO/3&Lang=En), accessed 28 October 2016.
UNICEF, Assessment of alternative forms of care and family support services for children with disabilities, December
2015, (https://www.unicef.org/tfyrmacedonia/UNICEF-Alternative_Care_Assessment-A4-ANG_for_web.pdf),
accessed 7 November 2016.
US DoS (United States Department of State),2015 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - Macedonia, 13 April 2016 (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/
hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=252873#wrapper), accessed 5 July 2016
Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 - Macedonia, 2 June 2016 (http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2015/257516.
htm), accessed 5 July 2016.
2014 Report on International Religious Freedom - Macedonia, 14 October 2015 (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/
irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2014&dlid=238406#wrapper), accessed 5 July 2016.
2015 Report on International Religious Freedom - Macedonia, 10 August 2016, (http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/
irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2015&dlid=256215#wrapper), accessed 27 October 2016.
2016 Trafficking in Persons Report, Macedonia, June 2016, (https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/countries/2016/258811.htm), accessed 14 November 2016.
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation), the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Constitution of the
Republic of Macedonia, 2011 (http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=10558), accessed 7 November 2016.

46 — EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus

Terms of Reference
Acknowledgments
Disclaimer
Abbreviations and acronyms
Introduction/Context
Map
1. State structure
1.1 Constitution
1.2 Executive branch• President• Government
1.3 Legislative branch• Parliament (assembly, senate?)
1.4 Administration
2. Socio-political landscape
2.1 Political parties
2.2 Elections
2.3 Opposition/ Armed groups
2.4 Civil society (ngo’s, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, labour
rights and conditions)
2.5 Media (TV, radio, newspapers, internet)
3. Rule of Law and State Protection
3.1. Law enforcement (include information about: Capacity to protect civilians; Corruption;
Abuse of power; accountability mechanisms to deal with these issues - where relevant)
3.1.1 Police
3.1.2 Army
3.1.3 Intelligence/Security forces
3.1.4 Corruption / fight against organised crime
3.2 Judiciary (include information about: Capacity to protect civilians; Corruption; Abuse of
power; Internal mechanisms to deal with these issues - where relevant)
3.2.1 Courts system (state courts, religious courts, military courts, etc.)
Capacity and Judicial integrity
4. Security situation (general, regional)
4.1 Short description of the (regional) situation
4.2 Amount/ Level of violence (chronology of main incidents)
4.3 Actors in the conflict (security forces, armed opposition groups)
4.4 Areas of control/influence
4.5 Impact of the violence to the population

EASO Country of Origin Information Report: The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – Country Focus — 47

5. Human rights situation
5.1 Legal context (relevant legislation: constitution, treaties, citizenship, etc.)
5.2 General situation (arbitrary arrests, detention, torture, disappearances, situation in
detention facilities, deportation/refoulement)
5.3 Specific groups (e.g., ethnic/religious minorities, journalists, human rights defenders,children, women, LGBT, victims of trafficking, returnees, etc.)
6. Reintegration of returnees
Bibliography
Terms of ReferenceHOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONSFree publications:• one copy:
via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu);• more than one copy or posters/maps:
from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm);
from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm);
by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm) or
calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*).
(*)

The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you).

Priced publications:• via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu).

BZ-07-16-015-EN-N
ISBN 978-92-9494-283-8