R e? f e ? r e n cz e? <a[RNDE823
RNDER50N Rosemary, REICH Victoria fl, WRGNER Pamela R and ZICH Robert.
Libraryof Congress online
publicthe Council on LibraryResources.

catalog
users survey: a report
Washington, DC: Library oftoCongress, Office of Planning 8, Development, Oct 29 1982, p17. ERIC: ED231384.
[BRTE77]
5PTE5 Marcia J. Factors affecting subject catalog search success.
Journal of the American Society

forInformation

Science28 3 May

1377 161-163.
CBRTEB63
BRTE5 Marcia J. Subject access in online catalogs : a design model.
Journal ofthe AmericanSocietyforInformation

Science37 6 Nov

1386 357-376.
CBELK87a]
BELKIN Nicholas J and CROFT W Bruce. Retrieval techniques. In:
Annual Review of Information

Scienceand Technology[RRISTJ 22,Martha E Williams Ced), Elsevier, 1387 103-145.
[BELKS7b]
BELKIN Nicholas J, BORGMRN Christine L, BROOKS Helen M, BYLRNDER Tom,CROFT W Bruce, DRNIEL5 Penny, DEERWE5TER Scott, FOX toward R, INGWERSENPeter, RRDR Roy, 5PRRCK JONES Karen, THOMPSON Roger and WRLKER Donald.
Distributed expert-based information systems: an interdisciplinaryapproach. Information
Processing & Management 23 5 '387 335-403.
[B00K851
B00KSTEIN Rbraham. Probability and fuzzy set applications toinformation retrieval. In: Annual Review of Information Science andTechnology [RRISTJ 20. Elsevier, 1385. pi 18-151.
[B0RG861
BORGMRN Christine L. The user's mental model of an information
retrieval system: an experiment on a prototype online catalog.
International

Journalof Man-Machine

Studies 24 1386 47-64.

[30YC85]
BOYCE Bert R and KRRFT Donald H. Principles and theories ininformation science. In: Annual Review ofInformation
Science and Technology [PRIST3 20. Elsevier, 1985. p153-178.
[CROF793
CROFT W B and HRRPER D J. Using probabilistic models of document
retrieval without relevance information. Journal of Documentation 35
C43, December 1373, 285-295.
[CR0F873
CROFT W Bruce and THOMPSON R H. I3R: a new approach to the designof document retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society forInformation

Science38 6 1987 389-404.

-110-References
CDEWE79]

Dewey DecimalClassification

and RelativeIndex.

Edition 13. Edited

under the direction of Benjamin R Custer. Forest Press, 1979.
[D05Z79a]
DQSZKQCS T E. RID : an Associative Interactive Dictionary for online
searching. Online Review 2 2 1978 163-173.
[DQ5279b]
DQ5ZK0C5 T E and RfiPP 3 R. Searching MEDLINE in English : a prototypeuser interface with natural language query, ranked output and relevance
feedback, timerican Society
for Information
Science.
Annual Meeting(42nd : October 1375 : Minneapolis!.
Information
Choices andPolicies

76. Edited by R D Tally and R R Deultgen. White Plains, NY : Knowledge
Industry, 1979, 131-123.
CD05Z83a]
DD5ZK0C5 T E. From research to application : the CITE natural language
information retrieval system. In : Research and Development inInformation

Retrieval.

Proceedings

Berlin1382. Edited by Gerard

SaLton and Hans-JGchen Schneider. Berlin : 5pringer-VerLag, 1963,
251-262.
[D05Z83bl
D05ZK0C5 T E. CITE NLM : natural-Language searching in an online
catalog. Information

Technologyand Libraries

2 4 Dec 1983 364-380.

[CD5Z85]
D05ZKQC5 T E. Rutomatic vocabulary mapping in online searching.
International Classification 10 2 1985 78-83.
[DCSZ36]
DD5ZK0C5 T E. Natural Language processing in Information Retrieval.
.Jo'jrnaiof

the Rmerican

Society forInformation

Science57 4 1586

131-196.
CEFTH89]EFTHIMIRDI5 Efthimis N and R0BERT5DN 5 E. Feedback and interaction ininformation retrieval. In: Perspectives in information management
CPIM 1), p257-272. Edited by Charles Oppenheim. Butterworths, 1389.
CELLISS]ELLIS David, HENDRY Ian G, NELI5 Kathleen., WILLETT Peter and WOOD
Frances 6. End user searching of bibliographic databases: evaluation ofan experimental best match retrieval system. In: Online
information
retrievalin practice.
Proceedings of the 2nd UK Online User GroupState of the Art Conference, Bristol. 1986. 12-24. Taylor Graham.
[HRNC88]
HRNCOCK Micheline. Review of Walker and Jones, "Improving subject
retrieval in online catalogues..". Journal of Documentation 44 2June 1988.
[HRRP7B1
HARPER D J and VRN RIJ5EERGEN C J. Rn evaluation of feedback in
document retrieval using co-occurrence data. Journal ofDocumentation 34 3 Sect 1978 189-216.
[HEND86a]-111-References

HENDRY Ian G, WILLETT Peter and WOOD Frances E. INSTRUCT: a teachingpackage for experimental methods in information retrieval. Part 1. The
users' view. Program 20 3 July 1986 245-263.
CHEND86b]
HENDRY Ian 6, WILLETT Peter and WOOD Frances E. IN5TRUCT: a teachingpackage for experimental methods in information retrieval. Part 2.
Computational aspects. Program 20 4 Oct 1986 382-393.
[H0R077]
HOROWITZ E and 3RHNI 5. Fundamentals

of datastructures.

Pitman,1977.
[J0NE86]rc
5 Richard M. Improving Okapi: transaction Log analysis of failed
searches in an online catalogue. VINE 62 May 1986 3-13.
[J0NE88]
J0NE5 Richard M. fl comparativeevaluationof two online
catalogues:
user opinions
about the design of online

publicaccesscatalogues.

British Library Research & Development Department, 1988. (BritishLibrary Research Paper 33D[MRRK83]
MRRKEY K. Online catalogue
use : results of surveys and focus
group
interviewsin severallibraries.
Finalreportto the Council onLibraryResources. Vol.

II.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center, 1983.

[MRRK84]
MRRKEY K. Subject searching in

introduction
1984.

of online

library

catalogs.

catalogs: beforeand after

theOCLC Online Computer Library Center,

CMRRK86]
MRRKEY K and DEMEYER R N. Dewey Decimal Classification

OnlineProject: evaluationof a libraryschedule and index integrated
intothesubjectsearchingcapabilities
of an onlinecatalogue.
Final reportto theCouncil
1986.

on LibraryResources. OCLC Online Computer Library Center,

EMRR060]
MRRON M E and KUHN9 J L. On relevance, probabilistic indexing andinformation retrieval. Journalof

the RssociationofComputing

Machinery 7 1960 216-244.
[MI5C82J
MI9CH0 W. Library of Congress Subject Headings: a review of theproblems, and prospects far improved subject access. Cataloging &Classification

Quarterly

1 2/3 1982 109-124.

[MITE8Sa]
MITEV N N. The user interface in an online public access catalogue. In:Computer RssistedInformationRetrieval

RIRO 85. International

Svmposium organised by the Centre de Hautes Etudes d'InformatiqueDocumentaire and the Institut d'Informatique et de Math£matiques
Rppliqu£s de Grenoble, 18-20 March 1989, Grenoble. Paris : CNR9-IMRG,
1989.
[MITEBSb]-112-References
MITEV N N, VENNER G M and WRLKER 5. Designing an online
catalogue: Okapi, a catalogue
on a local area network.

publicaccess[Library andInformation Research Report 393. London : British Library, 1985.
CMITEB5c]
MITEV N N and WRLKER 5. Information retrieval aids in an online publicaccess catalogue : automatic intelligent search sequencing. In:Informatics

8: Advances

inintelligent

retrieval.

Proceedings of an

Rslib/BES conference. Oxford, 16-17 Rpril 1985. London : RsLib, 1985.
[D0RT88]
PORTER Martin F and 6RLPIN Valerie. Relevance feedback in a
public access catalogue for a research Library: Muscat at the
Scott Polar Research Institute. Program 22 1 Jan 88 1-20.
[R0BE7B]
R0BERT50N 5 E and SPRRCK J0NE5 Karen. Relevance weighting of searchterms. Journalofthe RmericanSocietyforInformationScience27

May-June 1976 129-46.
CR0BE77]
R0BERT50N 5 E. The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal ofDocumentation 33 4 Dec 1977 294-304.
[R0BE81]
ROBERTSON 5 E. The methodology of information retrieval experiment. In:
Information

retrievalexperiment,edited by Karen Sparck Jones.

Butterworths, 1981, pp 9-31.
[RQBE86a]
RCEERTSON S E. On relevance weight estimation and query expansion.
Journalof Documentation

42 3 Sep 1986 182-188.

LRGEE86b]
ROBERTSON 5 E, THOMPSON 0 L and MRORSKILL M J. Weighting, ranking andrelevance feedback in a front-end system. Journal ofInformation
Science 12 1/2 1986 71-75.
[R0CC71]
RCCCHIO J J. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: The
SMRRT retrieval

system:experiments

inautomatic

document

processing.

Edited by G Salton. Prentice-Hall, 1971. p239-246.
[5RLTE8]
5PLT0N 6. Rutomatic

information

organization

andretrieval.

McGraw-Hill, 1968.
CSRLT71]
SPLTON Gerard (editor). The SMRRT retrieval
system:automatic
document processing.
Prentice-Hall, 1971.

experiments

in[5RLT85]
SPLTON G, FOX E R and V00RHEE5 E. Rdvanced feedback methods ininformation retrieval. Journalofthe Rmerican

SocietyforInformation

Science 36 3 May 85 200-210.
[SARR75]
SPRPCEvlG T. Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on
the notion in information science. Journal of the Rmerican Society for-113-

References
I n f o r m a t i o n Science 26 6 Nov-Dec 75 321-343.
CSEALS2]

SEAL RLan, BRYRNT Philip and HRLL Carolyn. Full and short entry
catalogues: Library needs and uses. Bath: Bath University Library,Centre for Catalogue Research, 1382. CBLRD Report 5663.)[5IE682]
5IEGEL Elliott R. Online catalog study final report. National
Library of Medicine, 1382. ERIC ED 223051.
E5IEG843
5IE6EL E R and others. R comparative evaluation of the technicalperformance and user acceptance of two prototype online catalog systems
Information

Technologyand Libraries

3 1 Mar 1384 35-46.

[5MER831
5MERT0N R F and VAN RIJ5BERGEN C J. The retrieval effects of query
expansion on a feedback document retrieval system. Computer Journal
26 1383 233-246.
[5PRR72]
5PRRCK JONES Karen. A statistical interpretation of term specificity
and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation 28 1March 1372 11-21.
[TRGL77JTRGLIRCOZZO R. Estimating the satisfaction of information users.
Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 65 2 Rpr 1377 243-243[VAN77]
VAN RIJ5BERGEN C J. R theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence
data in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation 33 2 Jun!377 106-113.
[VAN731
VAN RIJ5BER6EN C J. Information
1373.

retrieval.

2nd ed. Butterworths,[VAN81]
VRN RIJ5BERGEN C J, HRRPER D J and PORTER M F. The selection of goodsearch terms. Information Processing and Management 17 1381 77-31.
[WRDE88]
WADE 5 J and WILLETT Peter. INSTRUCT: a teaching package forexperimental methods in information retrieval. Part III. Browsing,clustering and query expansion. Program 22 1 Jan 88 44-61.
[WAJE83J
WAJENBERG A 5. MARC coding of DDC for subject retrieval. Information
Technology and Libraries
2 3 Sep 1383 246-251.
[WALK853
WALKER Stephen. Improving subject access in an online catalogue byusing reLevance feedback and classification codes. Research proposal tothe British Library Research and Development Department. September/November 1385. Unpublished.
[WALK861-114-References

WRLKER Stephen. Ease of use in online catalogues: a plea for the user.
In: Online

publicaccess to Library

files.

Second NationalConference. Edited by Janet Kinsella. Elsevier, 13BB. p79-8S.
CWRLK87a]
WRLKER Stephen. OKRPI : evaluating and enhancing an experimental online
catalogue. Library Trends, Spring 1987
[WRLK87b]
WRLKER Stephen and JONES Richard M. Improving
onlinecatalogues:

1. Stemming,cross-referencetables.
Research Paper 24.

automatic

subject retrieval

spelling

correctioninandBritish Library, 1987. British Library[WRLK881WRLKER Stephen. Improving subject access painlessly: recent work on theDkapi projects. Program 22 1 Jan 88 21-31.
[WRLK89a]
WRLKER Stephen. The Dkapi online catalogue research projects. In:
The online

catalogue:

developments

and directions.

Edited by Charles

R Hildreth. Library Association, 1989. p84-106.
[WRLK89bl
WRLKER Stephen. Interactional aspects of a reference retrieval systemusing semi-automatic query expansion. In: Informatics
70: prospects
for intelligent
retrieval.
University of York, 21-23 March 1989.
Rslib, 1989.

-115-