Voting Rights ofFormer Felons
June 2016
Author: Amy Miller, J.D. Legal Director
Research Assistants: Kelli Yost and Madison Wurtele
The ACLU of Nebraska is a non-profit, non-partisan organization that works to defend
and strengthen the individual rights and liberties guaranteed in the United States andNebraska Constitutions through a sophisticated program of integrated advocacy withstrategies that include litigation, negotiation, policy research, and public education. In
2016 we are proudly celebrating our 50th anniversary and are supported by over 2,000
members and about 6,000 supporters stretching far across our great state.
Voting is the cornerstone of our democracy and the fundamental right upon which all
our civil liberties rest. The right to vote is constitutionally protected under the state andfederal constitutions. Specifically, Article I, Section 22 of the Nebraska State
Constitution says: “All elections shall be free; and there shall be no hindrance orimpediment to the right of a qualified voter to exercise the elective franchise.” This
provision is substantial, broad and goes farther to protect the right to vote than thefederal Constitution.
The ACLU of Nebraska works to protect and expand Nebraskans' freedom to vote. We
have secured decisive voting rights victories that include winning the right of a first
responder to exercise his right to vote on Election Day, standing up for the rights ofminority and voters with disabilities, fighting for fairness and equal treatment of all
candidates and ballot questions, successfully beating back discriminatory Voter ID laws
in the Nebraska Legislature, monitoring the availability of Spanish-language voter
materials and consistently supporting felon re-enfranchisement laws allowing
Nebraskans to regain their voting rights after completing their sentence.

2Policy Overview: Ex-Felon Voter Registration
Voting is one of the most fundamental rights that demonstrates a citizen’s connection toand participation in her community. When we turn away an eligible voter fromregistering or submitting a ballot, we are denying their political voice.
Criminal disenfranchisement laws proliferated during the Jim Crow era were intended
to bar minorities from voting. In the modern era, laws that disqualified those with aconviction have had the impact of diminishing the collective voice of communities ofcolor as well as the poor. When Nebraska had a lifetime ban on felons’ voting rights, wewere denying participation in our body politic to tens of thousands of people.
Neb. Rev. Stat. 29-112 was amended in 2005 to automatically remove disqualification tovote from anyone with a felony conviction once two years elapsed from their completionof their sentence. The proposal had no opponent testimony at the hearing, and passed
into law with a supermajority of senators overriding a gubernatorial veto.1 The bipartisan support for re-enfranchisement mirrored American opinions on this issue:
according to a recent survey, eight out of ten Americans support voting rights for
citizens who have completed their sentence.2
This significant reform was estimated at the time of the law’s passage to affectapproximately 59,000 Nebraskans.3 More recent reports indicate that approximately
7,819 former felons in Nebraska were restricted from voting in the 2010 elections.4
Every year, the Nebraska Department of Corrections estimates 2,000 people with afelony conviction complete their sentence and are returned to their communities. 5 Given
the large number of impacted Nebraskans, it is essential that election officials arefamiliar with former felons’ eligibility.
People with a former felony have returned to their community and are striving tobecome contributing members of society. This is why Nebraska’s felony reenfranchisement law was such a significant step forward. Unfortunately, passage of thelaw is meaningless if election officials are struggling with implementation.

1 LB 53 Committee Statement, 99th Legislature.
http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/99/PDF/CS/LB53.pdf
2 The Sentencing Project: “Felony Disenfranchisement, A Primer,”
3 http://journalstar.com/news/local/effort-under-way-to-get-ex-felons-registered-tovote/article_75945fad-fbea-51b6-9975-21911ed8bfe3.html
4 “Prisoner Reentry FAQ,” Legislative Research Office (2014), page 6.
http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov/pdf/reports/research/prisonerreentryfaq2014.pdf
5 Id. at page 2.

ACLU of Nebraska

Voting Rights of Former Felons

June 2016

3ACLU Phone Survey on Felon Re-enfranchisement
Between May 27 and June 6, 2016, ACLU volunteers phoned all 93 election
commissioners to ask “Can a former felon register to vote?” Our volunteers wrote down
the response from each county. See Appendix for a full table of each county’s response.
Many counties immediately and politely provided the accurate information — “Yes, if it’s
been two years.” Our volunteers recorded great customer service and friendly
demeanors in many of these counties.
However, our volunteers also encountered several counties who gave inaccurate
information initially but then corrected after consulting someone else on staff. Severalcounties commendably went the extra mile and phoned our volunteers back to makesure they corrected a mistake. We’ve counted all of these in the appendix as “accurate”
because ultimately the right information was given, but it is concerning that 14 counties
could not provide legally accurate information from the outset.6
Disturbingly, a decade after our ex-felon voting rights law was adopted,
only half of all counties provided correct and accurate information.
The inaccurate responses by election staff ranged from people who were apologetic forlacking knowledge, to people who were friendly while giving completely inaccurate
answers, to slightly aggressive rejections with definitively inaccurate answers. Notably,
three common misperceptions emerged:“You can vote if it’s been five years.” (Boone, Saunders)“You can vote if you’ve had your rights restored by the court / have paperwork
from the judge / if you’ve been pardoned.” (Dixon, Fillmore, Harlan, Hooker,Loup, Pierce, Saline, Scottsbluff, Seward)“It depends on what your charge / sentence was.” (Boyd, Kearney, Nuckolls)

It remains unclear what if any impact or discouragement this dynamic has caused for
those who have completed the terms of their sentence and have attempted to register tovote as they reintegrate into our communities. As the Vera Institute has said, “The pathto social reintegration after incarceration is fraught with significant obstacles. Adjusting
to life outside of prison can be a profound challenge, particularly after a long sentence.
People released from prison or discharged from community supervision find that theymust also comply with a vast array of rules and regulations that flow from having acriminal record. Many of these strictures limit their integration into mainstreamsociety…”.7 While former felons navigate these obstacles, we should ensure that
resuming their right to vote, at least, should not be difficult.

6 Counties listed as “accurate” but who initially gave inaccurate information before they corrected themselves:
Boone, Burt, Dawes, Frontier, Gage, Greeley, Hamilton, Hayes, Holt, Hooker, Otoe, Perkins, Richardson, Rock.
7 Vera Institute of Justice, “Justice in Review: New Trends in State Sentencing and Corrections 2014-15” May2016.

ACLU of NebraskaVoting Rights of Former Felons

June 2016

4

Proposed Solutions
Election Officials Education
The confusion among county officials on the issue of ex- felon voting rights is cause forconcern. We suggest the Secretary of State immediately provide clear written guidance
to all election officials on these issues. We also recommend that the Secretary of State
and/or the Nebraska Association of County Officials work together to schedule a
training—prior to the November 2016 elections—in person or via webinar to addressthese issues and improve understanding and compliance on these and any othersignificant voter access matters.

Establish Uniform Election Guidelines
Newly elected officials at the county level are entrusted with an essential task involving
the fundamental right to vote. Most would begin working at their new position without apast knowledge of election laws. They need uniform election guidelines to ensurestatewide processes that comport with state and federal law. As now-Senator Adam S.
Morfeld wrote in 2012, “a recent national study found that on average local election
administrators have less than twenty hours of formal training.”8Public Education
Since the passage of Neb. Rev. Stat. 29-112, there have not been meaningful efforts by
the state to educate former felons. For example, a review of the Secretary of State's
website shows specific helpful tabs for “student voters,” “military voters,” and “overseasvoters,” but no such tab for former felons. Additionally, the Secretary of State hasdeveloped and posted two online publications (16 page “A Guide for Registering to Voteand Voting in Nebraska”9 and 2 page “Voter Rights”10), but neither mentions the rightsof former felons to register to vote. The sole information provided to former felons on
the Secretary of State's website is an entry in the list of “Voter Information Frequently
Asked Questions.”11
A simple and cost effective solution to this problem is to have the Secretary of State's
office update their web materials on this point and to ensure that critical information
resources provide clear and prominent instructions that spell out the rights of former
felons. We also encourage the Secretary of State to explore other public education
strategies such as media releases, partnerships with community organizations, social
media postings, public service announcements, pamphlets or other materials, as part ofa proactive effort to educate Nebraskans.

8 Adam S. Morfeld, Addressing Constitutional Concerns and Strengthening Nebraska's Election Administration: A
Roadmap to Substantive Reform, 90 Neb. L. Rev. 786, 809 (2012)9 http://www.sos.ne.gov/elec/voter_outreach/pdf/first_time_voters.pdf
10 http://www.sos.ne.gov/elec/pdf/voter_disability_rights.pdf
11 http://www.sos.ne.gov/elec/voter_info.html

ACLU of Nebraska

Voting Rights of Former FelonsJune 2016

5Eliminate the Two Year Waiting Period
Nebraska policymakers should reexamine the current two year waiting period that exfelons currently face. Confusion about and misapplication of the current law is de facto
disenfranchisement. We believe a simpler state law would make it easier for thepublic—and county officials—to understand the rule. If eligibility began immediately
upon completion of one’s sentence (i.e., the conclusion of parole or probation),
members of the public and election officials would have a clear and easy-to-understandrule to follow. As shown in the map in the Appendix, there is a growing trend thatexpands former felons' eligibility to vote.

Conclusion
Nebraska is fortunate to have election officials that work hard and run fair and clean
elections on both the local and state levels. However, there is always room for
improvement and when fundamental constitutional rights are involved there is almost
no room for error. We must continue to work together to remedy current issues andprotect the voting rights of all Nebraskans who are eligible to exercise the franchise.
Voter interest is high in a Presidential election year. Nebraska voters are highlymotivated to let their voices be heard at the ballot box, and Nebraska election officials
must continue to do all they can to ensure each vote can be cast and counted
appropriately.

ACLU of Nebraska

Voting Rights of Former Felons

June 2016

6

Appendix - Table of County Responses in Phone Survey
COUNTY
Adams
Antelope
ArthurBannerBlaineBoone
Box Butte
Boyd
Brown
Buffalo
Burt
Butler
Cass
Cedar
Chase
CherryCheyenne
Clay
ColfaxCumingCusterDakotaDawes
Dawson
Deuel
Dixon
Dodge
DouglasDundy
FillmoreFranklin
Frontier
FurnasGage
GardenGarfieldGosperGrantGreeley
Hall
Hamilton
HarlanHayes

Hitchcock
HoltHooker
HowardACCURATEANSWERxWRONG
ANSWER
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

COUNTY

ACCURATEANSWER

Jefferson
JohnsonKearney
KeithKeya Paha
Kimball
Knox
Lancaster
Lincoln
Logan
Loup
Madison
McPherson
MerrickMorrill
Nance
NemahaNuckolls
Otoe
PawneePerkins
Phelps
PiercePlattePolk
Red Willow
Richardson
RockSaline
Sarpy
Saunders
Scotts Bluff
SewardSheridanShermanSioux
StantonThayerThomasThurston
ValleyWashington
Wayne
Webster
WheelerYork

WRONG
ANSWER

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Total: 46 Accurate Answer; 47 Wrong Answer

ACLU of Nebraska

Voting Rights of Former Felons

June 2016

7Appendix – Map of National Voting Rights Laws

Source: https://www.aclu.org/map/state-criminal-re-enfranchisement-laws-map

ACLU of Nebraska

Voting Rights of Former Felons

June 2016