JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of 3.4MW Rooftop Solar Power System
to Air-conditioning Parts Factories

Reference number

TH005

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation

Date of completion of this report

26/07/2018

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in the
Emissionsourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposed
JCM project.
emission
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
impactimpact assessment, if required by the Kingdom ofassessment
Thailand, in line with Thai procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to
consultation
engage stakeholders and solicit comments for the proposed1JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Mr.
Ms.

Name

Company

Function*

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Team leader

Mr.
Mookrin
LRQA
Host country
Ms.
Sutuntaphida Thailand
expertMr.
Internal
Stewart Niu LRQA China
Ms.
reviewerMr.
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Schemecompetence*

Technical
competence*
Technical
competenceauthorised

On-site
visit

N/A
N/A

* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The initial version of PDD was checked and confirmed as complete against the JCM Guidelines
for Developing Project Design Document (PDD) and Monitoring Report (MR) No.
JCM_TH_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0. A valid form of the JCM PDD Form as of the time ofcommencement of the public comment period No. JCM_TH_F_PDD_ver02.0 was used. The
completeness was also checked for the revised PDD Version 2.0 dated 30/03/2018 and Version
3.0 dated 24/04/2018 submitted by the PPs for resolution of validation findings as below
mentioned.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PDD was completed using the valid form of the JCM
PDD Form and in accordance with the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
3

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The project is to introduce 3.4 MW rooftop solar power systems at 6 air-conditioning parts
factories of subsidiaries of SNC Former Public Co., Ltd. (SNC) in Rayong Province, Thailand.
Four factory buildings (SPEC1, SPEC2, SPEC3 and SPEC4) belong to SNC Pyongsan
Evolution Company Limited (SPEC) and rest two factory buildings (SCAN2 and SCAN3)
belong to SNC Creativity Anthology Company Limited (SCAN). Infinity Parts Co., Ltd. (IPC)and Ultimate Parts Company Limited (UMP) are subsidiaries of SPEC that operate using a partof the factory buildings and consume a part of solar power generated by the project.
The electricity produced by the project solar power systems is supplied to the 6 factories
displacing grid electricity generated using fossil fuels and reduces GHG emissions in Thailand.
The project solar power systems employ the crystalline silicon photovoltaic (PV) modules of
Sharp Corporation, Japan (ND-AH315 and ND-RA260).
The project is implemented by SNC and Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation.
The start date of project operation is on 01/12/2017 and the expected operational lifetime of the
project is for 10 years. The PPs referred to the Statutory useful life for the calculation ofdepreciation and amortization for machinery and equipment issued by Japan’s Ministry of
Finance for the basis of the expected operational lifetime of the project solar power systems
indicated as for 10 years (the other facilities for metal products manufacturing industries), while
the period of depreciation applied by SNC is for 25 years based on the expected lifetime of solar
power system and the industrial practices. The project solar power systems applying thestate-of-art design of the Japanese leading manufacturer will have a longer operational lifetime
with sound operation and maintenance activities, but the PPs selected shorter lifetime specified
by the applicable regulations. That is conservative and considered acceptable as it fulfils theduration of the crediting period.
The project receives financial support for JCM model projects from the Ministry of theEnvironment, Japan. The PP from Japan contributes in transfer of technology on the advanced
and efficient solar power system.
The validation team assessed the PDD and the supporting documents, interviewed the PPs tovalidate the requirements concerning accuracy and completeness of the project description.
Through the processes taken, CL 1 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 1
4

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify whether the project consists of asingle solar power system or solar power systems, to complete the Monitoring Spreadsheet as
appropriate for whether it is a single system or systems, and to provide supporting evidence for
figures/factors used to estimate electricity generation by the project solar powersystem/systems.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs revised the Monitoring Spreadsheet andprovided data sources for estimated electricity generation.
Assessment of the responses: The solar power systems consist of the systems installed on theroof top of 6 factory buildings and the estimated electricity generation by the solar powersystems is separately indicated in the MPS (input_separate) sheet of the revised Monitoring
Spreadsheet.
The PPs provided the data sources for estimated electricity generation by the project solar
power system/systems for confirmation by the validation team.
The CL was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team assessed the project description provided in the PDD with the supporting
documents to the requirements on the accuracy and completeness. The validation teamconfirmed that the proposed JCM project in the PDD is described in accurate and completemanners that is understandable the nature of the proposed project activity.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applied the approved methodology JCM_TH_AM001_ver01.0 "Installation of Solar
PV System" Ver 01.0.
LRQA assessed if the selected methodology is applicable to the proposed project. The projectapplicability was checked against each eligibility criterion in the selected approved
methodology. The steps taken to validate each eligibility criterion and the conclusions about its
applicability to the proposed project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The project installs solar PV system(s).
Justification in the PDD: The solar PV systems are installed on to the rooftops of factories inRayong Province.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the project documentation,technical specification, the test and commissioning report, and the on-site visit and interviews
were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the5

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

project installed rooftop solar PV systems at the factories of SNC subsidiaries and the criterion
is met.
Criterion 2: The solar PV system is connected to the internal power grid of the project site
and/or to the grid for displacing grid electricity and/or captive electricity at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: The solar PV systems are connected to the internal power grids of the
project sites (each of factories) for displacing grid electricity at the project sites.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the electricity diagram, and theon-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project sites.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
project solar PV systems are connected to the internal electricity supply systems of the factories
of SNC subsidiaries. The electricity supply systems of SNC subsidiaries are connected to the
public power grid system and no captive electricity is used in the project sites. The project was
confirmed to displace consumption of grid electricity. The systems to prevent reverse power
flow from the project solar PV systems to the public power grid systems have been installed andthe electricity generated by the project solar PV systems is only consumed at the project sites.
The criterion is met by the proposed project.
Criterion 3: The PV modules have obtained a certification of design qualifications (IEC 61215,
IEC 61646 or IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Justification in the PDD: The PV modules installed in the project have been certified for IEC
61215, IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification,
certificates of design qualifications and safety qualification, the test and commissioning report,
and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the PV
modules of the project solar PV system have obtained the certificates in compliance with theinternational standards IEC61215, IEC61730-1 and IEC61730-2 as appropriate. The criterion
was therefore fulfilled.
Criterion 4: The equipment to monitor output power of the solar PV system(s) and irradiance isinstalled at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: Electricity meters and pyranometers have been installed at the projectsites to monitor output power and irradiance respectively.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification, thetest and commissioning report, and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the
project site.
6

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that themonitoring equipment has been installed for output power of the solar PV systems as well as
irradiance at the project sites. Thus the criterion was confirmed as satisfied by the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project applied the valid version of the approved
methodology and the applicability was demonstrated to the eligibility criteria as appropriate.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The project supplies electricity generated by 3.4 MW solar power systems installed on therooftop of factory buildings for the self-consumption and displaces electricity purchased fromthe public power grid system.
The source of GHG emissions is consumption of grid electricity and CO2 emissions in thereference scenario are considered to determine the reference emissions (REs), while the projectemissions (PEs) are assumed to be zero for the solar PV system in accordance with the applied
methodology. The annual electricity generation of the project is estimated ex-ante at 3,698.10
MWh. The default CO2 emission factor for the PV system connected to the national grid of
0.319 t-CO2/MWh is applied. The annual GHG emission reductions (ERs) are calculated using
the estimated annual electricity generation of the project: ERs = REs – PEs = 3,698.10 MWh x
0.319 – 0 = 1,179 t-CO2e. The project started operation from 01/12/2017 and the ERs in thefirst year and the last year are estimated as: 1,179 x 1/12 = 98 tCO2e and 1,179 x 11/12 = 1,081
tCO2e respectively.
The validation team assessed the documented evidence and confirmed that all the relevant GHG
emission sources covered in the applied methodology are addressed, and the steps taken and theequations applied to calculate REs for the proposed project comply with the requirements of theapproved methodology.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Please refer to CL1 and its resolution in the above Section C.2.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
7

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The validation team confirmed that:- The methodology was applied correctly to calculate PEs and REs and no other significant
emission source was identified that would be affected and reasonably attributed by
implementation of the proposed project but not addressed by the applied methodology;- The choice of whether an emission source or gas is to be included where the applied
methodology allows was reasonably justified by the PPs;
- The Monitoring Plan Sheet (MPS) was not altered and the fields were filled in as required sothat all estimates of the REs could be replicated using the data and parameter values provided in
the PDD;- The values for the project specific parameters fixed ex ante listed in the MPS were appropriate
with all the data sources and assumptions and the calculations were correct to the proposed
JCM project;- All assumptions and data used by the PPs were listed in the PDD, including their references
and sources; and- All values used in the PDD were considered reasonable in the context of the proposed JCM
project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The proposed project is to install 3.4 MW rooftop solar power systems at the existing factorybuildings and an environmental impact assessment is not required by laws of the host country.
The validation team assessed the applicable legal requirements in the host country using its
local sources/expertise and confirmed that an environmental impact assessment is not required
to be conducted for implementation of the project.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed by assessing the relevant documents and using the local
sources/expertise that the project does not need an environmental impacts assessment to be
conducted to meet the legal requirement of the host country and the PDD satisfies therequirements of the JCM.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation
8

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Means of validation>
The PPs identified the government of the host country, staff of SNC and local residents as themain local stakeholders and held a consultation meeting. Representatives of the local
stakeholders attended the meeting provided comments mainly related to the implementation of
the project and no negative issue was raised through the process.
Through the processes taken, CL 2 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 2
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify why PDD E.2. did not include all
the comments received from the local stakeholders and how due account has been taken of
those comments.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs reviewed and corrected the PDD.
Assessment of the responses: The PPs revised the PDD and added the comments as relevant.
The CL was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PPs have invited comments to the proposed project fromthe relevant local stakeholders, the summary of the comments received is provided in the PDD
in a complete manner and the PPs have taken due account of all the comments received fromthe local stakeholders as the processes described in the PDD.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The MP consisting of the MPS and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) is based on the approved
methodology.
The electricity generated by the project solar power systems is directly and continuously
measured. The reading is taken by electricity meters and inverter cluster controllers installed tomeasure electricity generation from the solar power systems on the roof of respective factorybuildings.
The electricity meters are designed to comply with requirements of IEC 62053-22 and theaccuracy class is 0.2s.
The roles and responsibilities of the persons are described in the MSS in accordance with therequirements of the applied methodology. The reading results of electricity meters are monthly
recorded, checked by the QA/QC team, Deputy Project Manager and Project Manager.
9

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The validation team confirmed that the MP complied with the requirements in the approved
methodology and that the PPs will be able to apply the MP following the monitoringarrangements described in it. CAR 1 and CAR 2 were issued that the details of resolution are as
described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: The figure of the PDD C.2. and the Monitoring Plan did not describe
as relevant to the project:
1) The monitoring point,2) Whether the reading from electricity meters or inverters is recorded manually orelectronically,3) The quality and accuracy controls applied to electricity meters or inverters, and
4) The roles and responsibility of monitoring personnel for maintaining and control ofmeasuring instruments at the monitoring point.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs submitted the revised PDD and MPS withsupporting documents.
Assessment of the responses:
1) The electricity meters and inverters are marked as the monitoring point in the revised PDD.
2) The revised PDD and MPS confirm the readings are taken from both electricity meters andinverters and the records are kept manually and electronically.
3) The revised PDD and MPS confirm that the data of the main monitoring from the inverters ischecked by the same of the secondary monitoring using the electricity meters. Accuracy class ofthe electricity meters is 0.2s and those are calibrated every 5 years following manufacturer’s
recommendation. The initial calibration was conducted for total 8 electricity meters on
30/11/2016 and 02/12/2016.
4) QA/QC assigned from SPEC is responsible for maintaining and control of measuring
instruments at the monitoring point in the revised MSS.
The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs should confirm how the PPs ensure that data monitored andrequired for verification and issuance be kept and archived electronically for two years after the
final issuance of credits.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs revised the "(i) Measurement methods and
10

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

procedures, MPS(input)" of Monitoring Spreadsheet.
Assessment of the responses: The PPs revised the MPS and confirmed that data monitored andrequired for verification and issuance be kept and archived electronically for two years after the
final issuance of credits.
The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MP was described in compliance with the requirementsof the approved methodology and the Guidelines for developing PDD and MR, and the PPs
have demonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure and their ability to implement the MP.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was submitted to LRQA in the form JCM_TH_F_MoC_ver01.0. The MoC nominates
Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation as the focal point and was signed by the authorized
representatives of all the PPs with the contact details. The form used is the latest one as of thetime of validation. The validation team assessed the personal identities including specimen
signatures and employment status of the authorized signatories through directly checking theevidence for corporate and personal identity of the PPs and their authorised signatories. The
validation team also confirmed through reviewing the corporate information of the PPs and bymeeting the persons representing the PPs that the information provided in the MoC is correct.
CAR 3 was issued that the details of resolution are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 3
Nature of the issue raised: The MoC submitted by the PPs was not completed with the date ofsubmission and the dates for signing by the signatories. The last and first names of signatories
should be filled in the correct locations in the Section 2.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs submitted the MoC dated 30/11/2017 andsubsequently the revised MoC dated 24/04/2018 following the change in name of the focal
point entity for review by the validation team.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the MoC resubmitted by the PPs
and the subsequent revised MoC, and confirmed the date of submission and the dates for
signing by the signatories have been filled.
The CAR was closed.
11

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MoC was completed using the latest form after
assessment conducted on relevance of the MoC in compliance with the requirements of the
JCM Guidelines.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The validation team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation in the MoC
from the PPs that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS) and found no identical project as the proposed JCM project interms of the name of entities, applied technology, scale and the location. The result ofresearches confirmed that the proposed project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG
emission reductions.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
The start date for the operation of the proposed JCM project is indicated in the PDD as
01/12/2017.
The validation team confirmed correctness/relevance of the information by reviewing the
supporting evidence, including but not limited to assessing of the contracts and commissioning
report, and that the date is not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
12

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the start date of operation of the proposed JCM project is
01/12/2017 and not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No issue was identified as relevant element not covered above.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Not applicable<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD is to be made publicly available for 30days to invite public comments. The PDD was made publicly available in line with therequirements of the procedure for the period of 28/03/2018 to 26/04/2018 as per
https://www.jcm.go.jp/th-jp/projects/48.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the above period to receive public inputs.
Thus no action was required to be taken by the PPs to satisfy the JCM requirement.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
SNC Pyongsan Evolution Company Limited (SPEC)13

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Somchai Ngamkitcharoenlap, Managing Director
Sharp Corporation
Hiroya Ota, Supervisor, Global Sales and Marketing Division, Engineering Business Unit,
Energy Solution Business Unit (Global New Business Promotion Division, Project Business
Unit, Sharp Energy Solutions Corporation)
Sharp Solar Solution Asia Co., Ltd.
Yoswaris Dulpinitpattana, General Manager, Operation and Maintenance
Somporn Chongkolwanichsuk, Electrical Engineer, Project Engineering
Mongkol Boonpan, Maintenance Engineer
Tharatan Pimulchat, Assistant Engineer

E.2. List of documents received
Category A documents (documents prepared by the PP)- PDD Version 1.0 dated 26/03/2018 with the monitoring spreadsheet- PDD Version 2.0 dated 30/03/2018 with the monitoring spreadsheet- PDD Version 3.0 dated 24/04/2018- MoC and the draft revision dated 30/11/2017- Revised MoC dated 24/04/2018 (Change in the focal point entity)- Solar Rooftop System Overview, photograph and layout- Specification of main equipment- SNC Former Public Company Limited, Annual Report 2015
- JCM project implementation plan
- Evidence for authorization of signatories for the MoC, including those for the revised MoC
and change in the focal point entity- Consortium agreement- Project implementation schedule- PEA grid connection permission- EPC Contract for design, engineer, procure, construct, test and commissioning dated
19/09/2016- DC Cable Route and Cable Raceway- Aluminum Rail Plan of Mounting Structure- Single Line Diagram VAC and VDC Distribution Board- Communication Diagram
14

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Monitoring Diagram- EDMI Mk6E Advanced Three Phase Electronic Revenue Meter Specifications- KIPP & ZONEN Pyranometers Specifications- Commissioning report for 3.432 MWp dc PV Solar Roof System in SNC PYONGSANEVOLUTION CO., LTD (Rayong Province,Thailand) Date: 25 to 28 April 2017, Sharp Solar
Solution Asia Co., Ltd.
- Estimation of solar power generation- Useful lifetime based on the act of Japan’s Ministry of Finance for calculation of useful
lifetime for depreciation and amortization- Depreciation period of solar power generation system- Certificate of IEC 61215, IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2 issued by TUV Rheinland dated
18/08/2016- Certificate of IEC 61215, IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2 issued by VDE Testing andCertification Institute dated 31/10/2013- Relaying and Metering Diagram SPEC1- Relaying and Metering Diagram SPEC2- Relaying and Metering Diagram SPEC3- Relaying and Metering Diagram SPEC4- Relaying and Metering Diagram SCAN2- Relaying and Metering Diagram SCAN3- Photograph of diesel generator- Thai Government Gazette No. 130- Guidance for Environmental Code of Practice- ERC exemption permission letter- Introduction by Sharp Corporation for stakeholders consultation meeting, November 2017
- Records of local stakeholders consultation meeting- Technical information – Measurement accuracy for PV Inverter Sunny Boy and Sunny Mini
Central, SMA- Manufacturer’s recommendation for calibration frequency of electricity meter- Irradiation data from Meteonorm- Simulation results for estimated electricity generation
Category B documents (other documents referenced)- JCM_TH_AM001_ver01.0 Installation of Solar PV System- Additional Information to the Proposed Methodology “Installation of Solar PV System”- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_TH_PCP_ver02.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_TH_GL_VV_ver01.0
15

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_TH_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_TH_Glossary_ver01.0- JCM PDD Form JCM_TH_F_PDD_ver02.0- JCM MoC Statement Form JCM_TH_F_MoC_ver01.0- JCM Validation Report Form JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- SNC Former Public Company Limited, Annual Report 2016
- Registered PDD of JCM project ref No. TH001 Introduction of Solar PV Systems on Rooftopsof Factory and Office Building- Validation report of registered JCM project ref No. TH001 Introduction of Solar PV Systems
on Rooftops of Factory and Office Building- Approved Small Scale CDM Methodology AMS I.D. Version 18.0 Grid connected renewableelectricity generation- Approved CDM Methodological Tool to calculate the Emission Factor for an electricity
system- Proposed and registered projects under CDM, VCS, Gold Standard, and the other international
schemes- IEC 62053-22:2003, Electricity metering equipment (ac) - Particular requirements. Part 22:
Static meters for active energy (classes 0,2 S and 0,5 S)- APLMF Economy Report Thailand, Central Bureau of Weights and Measures- Weights and Measures Act B.E. 2542 (1999)

16

JCM_TH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

17

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: Validation for Introduction of 3.4MW Rooftop Solar Power
System to Air-conditioning Parts Factories

We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the validation process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the validation of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba

Team Leader

Mookrin Sutuntaphida

Host Country Expert

Stewart Niu

Technical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific07/02/2018

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA), and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'Lloyd’s Register'. Lloyd’s Register assumes noresponsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in thisdocument or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the provision of thisinformation or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 0, 20 November 2014