【Ex-Post Monitoring of Completed ODA Loan Project】
Indonesia"Surabaya Urban Development Project (1)"External Evaluator: George Terahara(International Development Center of Japan Incorporated)
Field Survey: March- April 2012
1. Project Description

Map of the Project Area

Margomulyo Road

1.1 Project Objective
The project was to develop urban road, drainage, solid waste and water supply sub-sectors in
the city of Surabaya in order to improve living environment, and thereby activate the regional
economy and improve the welfare of local citizen.
1.2 Outline of the Loan Agreement
Loan Amount/

11,251 million yen/10,893 million yen

Disbursed Amount
Loan Agreement Signing Date/

February 1993/March 2004

Final Disbursement Date
Ex-post Evaluation

FY 2006

Executing Agency

DG. Cipta Karya, The Ministry of Public Works

Main Contractors

PT. Hutama Karya (Indonesia)/PT. Pembangunan
Perumahan (Indonesia)/CV. Lanang Adhi Daya
(Indonesia)/PT. Waskita Karya (Indonesia)

Main Consultants

Pacific Consultants International (Japan), IDEA
Consultants (Japan), PT. Kartika Pradiptaprisma(Indonesia)-1-1.3 Background of Ex-post Monitoring
With an area of 332 km2 and a population of about 2.76 million people (as of Year 2010), theCity of Surabaya, the capital of the East Java Province, is the second largest city of Indonesia.
Like other cities in Indonesia, Surabaya was not sufficiently equipped with necessary urban
infrastructure. Aptly realizing those unfavorable circumstances and need for infrastructuredevelopment to provide the citizens with better living environment, the government ofIndonesia was promoting a plan for improving the urban environment of the Surabaya
metropolitan area in which the city of Surabaya occupies the center. The Ministry of Public
Works decided to implement a part of a plan through ODA yen loan.
Ex-post evaluation conducted in March 2007 recognized high effectiveness incountermeasures for traffic volume increase, control of flood damage, improved garbage
collection ability and increased water connection through expected appearance of results of thisproject. However, the project period was extended by complex factors brought about by the
economic disturbance and high inflation from Asian Economic Crisis in 1997, the collapse of
the Soeharto regime and consequent large-scale and frequent administrative changes at thecentral level as well as the regional levels. Finally, some components (Road: Kenjeran 1B and
EMRR (Eastern Middle Ring Road) 2A (completed in April 2007), Water Supply: Pipe
connection to East Side Ring Main have not been completed at the time of ex-post evaluation
and a component (Water Supply: Wonocolo Pump Station) was not operational after completionand efficiency was evaluated as low. As some problems have been observed in terms of
uncertainty of responsibility following the transfer of operation and maintenance control to a
new system, sustainability of this project was judged as moderate. In light of the above, thisproject was totally evaluated to be moderately satisfactory. Furthermore, it was recommended tofollow government regulations regarding land acquisition, to clarify management of operationand maintenance, to complete unfinished work early and to officially record flood damage.
Consequently, therefore, this project was selected for ex-post monitoring and reviewed undereach criterion with the findings from the field survey and other research activities with a final
conclusion being drawn.
2. Outline of Survey
2.1 Survey Schedule
Monitoring Period: January 2012- October 2012
Field Survey Period: March 21 - April 6, 2012
2.2 Constraints of Monitoring
The executing agency, DG. Cipta Karya (Directorate General of Human Settlement) of the
Ministry of Public Works, did not setup monitoring and evaluation and did not have informationand evaluation on the current situation of the project. At the time of appraisal, the Directorate-2-was assigned as the Executing Agency, and General Directorate of Roads and General
Directorate of Water Resources were responsible to process procurement for the portion ofurban roads and drainage under the national government. In addition, Surabaya City became
substantive Principal Implementing Agency responsible for procurement and coordination forthe subprojects under the city government. Thus, the monitoring mission requires visiting theCity Planning Bureau (BAPPEKO, the former coordinating agency) and organizations, inclusiveof national braches and local organizations, of four sectors and was limited in the efficiency ofthe survey. Consequently, a single responsible executing agency did not exist for the project as awhole.
3. Monitoring Results
3.1 Effectiveness3.1.1 Quantitative Effects
3.1.1.1 Indicators of Operations and Effects(1) Urban Roads(a) Project Components
The project constructed the following six components on the four roads (See Figure 1. The
components in italic show the unfinished parts at the time of ex-post evaluation)
1. Improvement of Kenjeran Road Stage 1, 1B & 2 (7,590 m)
2. Improvement of Margomulyo Road Second Carriageway (1,700 m)
3. Improvement of Margomulyo Road Additional Work (200 m)
4. Improvement of Margomulyo Road 3 (3,254 m)
5. Construction of Eastern Middle Ring Road (EMRR) Stage 2A & 2B (5,100 m)
6. Improvement of Mastrip Road 1 (3,209 m)
The total length is 5,100 m of new construction and 15,843 m of improvement (excluding
unfinished section of Kenjeran 1B, 1,810 m)-3-

Source: Ex-post Evaluation.

Figure 1 Location of Major Facilities under the Project(b) In-service Situation
The following sections, which were not completed at the time of ex-post evaluation, havebeen completed and already been in service.
―Kenjeran

Road

Stage

1B

was

completed in 2010 and all sections havebeen in service.
―EMRR 2A section was completed in April 2007 and all sections came into service in 2009.
(c) Traffic Volume
Right Figure shows traffic volume on Mastrip and Margomulyo Roads. Mastrip Road can becompared with similar indicators of ex-post evaluation.

The volume in 2011 is more than ten times the volume of 1993 (volume is expressed inaverage daily traffic) and they are utilized sufficiently. Both roads have very high traffic volume.
There are no official traffic volume counts on Kenjeran Road and EMRR.

-4-

(2) Drainage(a) Project Components
The project constructed the following four components (See Figure 1).
1. Improvement of Perbatasan River (channel improvement: 14.3 km)
2. Improvement of Kebonagung Canal (channel improvement: 6.0 km, excavation of channel
bed: 6.4 km)
3. Morokrembangan Boezem Improvement (total area of pond: 80.7 ha)
4. Remaining critical works of Kedurus River Improvement (Kedurus River channel
improvement: 2.7 km and Kebonagung Canal and replacement of structures)
Total length of canal improvement was 29.4 km and total area of pond improvement was 80.7ha.
(b) Occurrence of Flooding
Surabaya River has not experienced flooding since 2007. On the other hand, some areas haveproblems with inundation after rain (Figure 3). Because the drainage components of this project
had the purpose to divert the upper flow of Surabaya River to the right bank, the components
have performed with sufficient effectiveness against river overflow.
(c) Flooding Record
Public Works Department of the City has been keeping record of the flooding and inundation
damage (Figure 3) since 2007. The recommendation by ex-post evaluation to keep a flood
damage record was implemented.

Source: Public Works Department

Figure 3 Record of Flood Damage (2010)-5-

(3) Solid Waste(a) Project Components
The project procured equipment such as trucks and conducted civil work projects such as
rehabilitation and construction of depot facilities. Table 1 shows the numbers of procured
equipment and civil work projects and their current conditions.
Table 1 Procurement Numbers and Operational Condition
Operational Number
2007
2012
Ex-postEx-postJICA Document
Evaluation
Monitoring
43
42
38
0
0
In preparation 1
1
Disorder 1
1
1

Item

Procured
year

Truck
Handcart
Container

1994-95
1994-96
1994-96

43
280
219

Bulｌdozer

1994-95

2

Excavator
Construction of Solid
Waste Depots
Construction of
Civil Work Temporary Disposal Sites
Rehabilitation of
Project
Solid Waste Depots
Rehabilitation of
Temporary Disposal Sites

1994

1

1994-95999

1994-95

19

19

19

1994-95

31

31

31

1994-95

44

44

44

Equipment

2004

Count

Source: JICA Internal Document, Ex-Post Evaluation and City Department of Gardening and Cleaning.

(b) Operational Condition
Many trucks are currently operational (Table 1). According to City Department of Gardening
and Cleaning, Surabaya City collected 271 thousand tons of solid waste in the City in 2010 andalmost two thirds of it is collected by the trucks procured by the project. The procured trucks
and constructed facilities are currently in use. Although the number of trucks decreased from thetime of ex-post evaluation, the number of depots and temporary disposal sites did not change.
Therefore, the project demonstrated effectiveness mostly at the same level as the ex-post
evaluation.
(4) Water Supply(a) Project Components
The project implemented the following eight components and location of major components
is shown in Figure 1.
1. Transmission/primary/secondary water supply and distribution pipelines(1) Wonocolo – Putat Gede-6-(2) Putat Gede – Demak(3) Banyu Urip – Tandes
2. Secondary distribution (steel pipe) – Zones 4 + 5 (Total 415 km)
3. Pipe materials for reservoir sites
4. Tertiary distribution mains – Zones 4 + 5
5. House connections – Zones 4 + 5
6. Wonocolo Pump Station (not operational at the time of ex-post evaluation)
7. Putat Gede Distribution Facilities Installations
8. Takeover of the uncompleted IBRD portion(1) Pipe installation connecting Wonocolo Pump Station to existing East Side Ring Main
(ESRM) (uncompleted at the time of ex-post evaluation)(2) Connection of missing portion of ESRM near Galaxy Mall toward Kenjeran Road
(3) Connection of missing portion of ESRM, Wadung Asli - Rungkut(b) Current Situation of Uncompleted and Nonoperational Facilities
Through the completion of Karangpirang 3 Water Treatment Plant (not included in the
project), Wonocolo Pumping Station, which was not operational at the time of ex-post
evaluation, has been operational since 2009. Pipe installation connecting to existing ESRM has
been completed and is operational.
(c) Realized Water Supply Capacity and Facilities
Table 2 shows the realized water supply and distribution capacity and facilities.

-7-

Table 2 Realized Water Supply Capacity and Facilities(1) Reservoir Capacity(2) Working Pump Capacity(3) Stand-by Pump Capacity(4) Primary Mains(5) Secondary Mains(6) Tertiary Mains(7) New House Connection

Unit

By this Project㎥
Litter/sec
Litter/secmmm
Household13,0005,600
1,550
31,95568,070226,688
60,000Total (2011)

Portion ofthis Project

137,700
622,500
4,503,850
397,040

23%
11%
5%
15%

Source: Surabaya Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM).
Note: New house connection is in 2010.

The project completed new pump station and primary to tertiary mains. This resulted in the
23% of total length of primary main and 11% of secondary mains in 2011.
(d) Number of Users and Water Usage Volume
Table 3 Water Connections and Consumed Volume
Table 3 shows the number of water
connection

contracts

andconsumed

volume. The number of contracts andvolume increased significantly in the late
2000. Monthly water consumption per

Year
HouseholdBusiness
Industry
Social Activity
Governmental
Retail/ Tanker
Harbour
Off City
LossesTotal

1990
116,251
12,710
1,055
3,493
1,716

1995
175,863
15,023
795
5,386
898

2000
248,491
17,825
808
6,003
948

2
44

3
46

135,271

198,014--4
4
4
42 ----274,121
345,176
434,018

Year

1990
42,507
8,005
4,205
5,253
9,368
303
216
5,667
48,924
124,448

1995
64,72011,085
4,562
15,360
5,209
480
389
1,230
50,096
153,131

2000
83,103
10,434
4,728
18,019
7,585
112
622
6,809
79,862
211,274

30

31

28

3

household is around 30 m and does notchange significantly.

HouseholdBusiness
Industry
Social Activity
Governmental
Retail/ Tanker
Harbour
Off City
Losses
Total
Monthly usage3
per household m2005
312,297
24,903
869
5,972
1,131

Unit: 1,000m3/yr
2005
2010
110,961
132,145
14,672
17,305
4,846
6,057
16,637
15,674
6,197
6,270
105
11
548
397
92,762
246,728

89,793
267,652

30

28

S

Source: PDAM.

Table 4 shows the industrial connections in Western Surabaya, where the project supplied
water in Zone 4 and Zone 5, and Table 5 shows the household connections in the area.

-8-

2010
397,040
29,769
872
5,132
1,201

Table 4 Industrial Connections in Western Surabaya (Zone 4 and 5)
Customer Category
Tariff Code
Category
Small
32a &32cEnterprise
33
Small Industry
Large
43
Enterprise
Large Industry
44
Total

Number of Customers
2005
2011

1998
4,516

4,516

4,692

6,113

157

136

6,310

10,72344
11,203120
17,092

Source: PDAM.

In the water supply area of this project, the total number of industrial connections increased.
The total number in 2011 increased by 53% from 2005 when the ex-post evaluation occurred. It
can be said that this project contributed to the promotion of industrial location by corresponding
to the water demand in the target area through the increase of water supply capacity.
Table 5 Household Connections in Western Surabaya (Zone 4 and 5)
Customer Category
TariffCategory
Code2a.2
Basic Household
3aModest Household
4aMedium Household
4b.sLarge Household
3c.2
Luxury Household
Total

Number of Customers
1998

2005

2011

2,884
3,308
80

62,53347,02023,802

138

14,565

6,410

147,920

2,715
88,63555,71038,818
8,079
185,873

Source: PDAM

Compared to 2005, the household connections in 2011 increased by 26% in number, and by
13% in volume.
Therefore, it can be said the water supply capacity development through this projectcontributed to improved sanitary conditions and urban development by corresponding to water
demand of existing non-users and new residents.
3.1.1.2 Internal Rates of Return (IRR)
Although the ex-post evaluation did not calculate Internal Rate of Return (IRR), JICA
internal documents partially did. Therefore, this paper re-calculated IRRs based on a similar
method to the document and Table 6 shows the results.
EIRR and FIRR in the table mean the economic internal rate of return and the financial
internal rate of return, respectively.

-9-Table 6 Comparison of IRRs
SectorTarget of IRR

Drainage

Solid
Waste

Perbatasan River(EIRR)
Kebonagung
Canal (EIRR)
Morokrembangan
Pond (EIRR)
Total solid waste(FIRR)

Water
SupplyTotal watersupply (FIRR)

On Project
Completion(2004)
16.1%

Ex-postMonitoring(2012)
16.0%

7.4%

7.3%

16.7%

17.0%

11.53%

3.4%

8.2%

13.6%

Major reason for difference
The benefit by river improvement
slightly decreased due to the minor
population decrease in the target area.
The rate slightly increased due to minor
increase of target population.
The rate decreased due to decrease oftrucks and was unable to collect waste as
expected.
On
project
completion,
water
consumption was assumed to be constantafter completion. In fact, the water
consumption increased.

Source: JICA internal document and this monitoring survey.

3.1.2 Qualitative EffectBecause the ex-post evaluation did not measure qualitative effects, this Monitoring Survey
does not compare these.
Due to the above factors, the four infrastructure sectors of Surabaya City improved on theidentified problems, such as uncompleted sections and non-operational facilities, made by
ex-post evaluation. The uncompleted sections have been finished and are in service and thenon-operational facilities started functioning after completion of facilities in a previous stage.
Furthermore, urban road users and water users are increasing and the effects of this project
are more apparent compared to the time of ex-post evaluation.
3.2 Impact
3.2.1 Intended Impact
3.2.1.1 Population Increase
By improvement and supply of various infrastructures, the total population of the city
increased. Especially, its population increased in the West Ward, where the project improved
water supply (Table 7 and Figure 4).

-10-

Table 7 Population Transition in Surabaya City
Area
Ward
Central
North
East
South
West
Total

(sq.km)
14.79
38.39
91.18
64.06
124.21
332.63Population Growth Rate
(Annual %）2010
1990-2000 2000-2010
295,938-2.2%-0.8%
528,1680.3%
1.1%
803,204
1.1%
0.7%
677,9440.2%
0.0%
460,2332.9%
1.8%
2,765,487
0.5%
0.6%

Population (person)
1990
399,036
458,501
665,756
660,780
289,1992,473,272

2000
320,233
473,562
745,807676,878
383,318
2,599,798

3,000
2,500

Population (1,000)

2,000

West
South

1,500

East
North

1,000

Central
500
0
1990

2000

2010

Year

Source: Surabaya in Figures 2011 and others.

Figure 4 Population Transition in Surabaya City
3.2.1.2 Activation of Economic Performance
In addition to the above population increase, Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) in
Surabaya increased by annual growth rates of 5% to 7% (Table 8). The economy of Surabaya
has been growing steadily since 2000.
Table 8 Gross Regional Domestic Product of Surabaya City
GRDP
GRDP/CapitaYear(Rp million)(Rp thousand)
2000
50,301,846
20,574
2006
68,817,057
25,6592007
73,160,032
27,0702008
77,717,874
28,537
2009
82,014,714
29,885
2010
87,828,842
31,759Source: Surabaya in Figures 2011.
Note: 2000 Constant Price.

-11-

GRDP
Annual Growth
5.4%
6.3%
6.2%
5.5%
7.1%

GRDP/Capita
Annual Growth
3.7%
5.5%
5.4%
4.7%
6.3%

3.2.2 Other Impacts
3.2.2.1 Impact on Natural Environment
No specific impact has been identified.
3.2.2.2 Resettlement and Land Acquisition
UnevenNot smooth land acquisition of 109ha, which was required by three sectors except
solid waste, delayed the implementation of the project and resulted in the low efficiency.
Especially, the ex-post evaluation identified the prolonged negotiation process by Surabaya City
because of ambiguity of the rights of residents who refuse eviction (Kenjeran Road) andcalculation of the compensation amount including third-party (water supply facility). Later,according to BAPPEKO, Surabaya City became more careful in land acquisition for public
works, such as interaction based on clear rules, frequent briefings for residents, andenhancement of the compensation system.
Based on the above factors, the project had impact on activation of urban economy in
Surabaya City through economic infrastructure development, such as water and road, andimprovement of urban environment.
3.3 Sustainability
3.3.1 Structural Aspect of Operation and MaintenanceDuring project implementation, the executing agency, DG. Cipta Karya, worked as anintegrated supervisor over the multiple sectors, and it has not been involved in the project sincecompletion. Then the agency had no information at the time of ex-post evaluation and ex-postmonitoring. The agency is also not involved in operation and maintenance and the responsibleorganization is different for each infrastructure.
3.3.1.1 Urban Roads
The roads in Indonesia are classified into national, provincial and city roads by the functionsof arterial, collector-distributor and city roads, respectively.
At the Feedback Seminar held at the time of ex-post evaluation in 2007, participants agreed
that the Margomulyo and Mastrip Roads belonged to East Java Province and Kenjeran Road did
to Surabaya City. In addition, although the participants did not explicitly confirm, they agreed
that the EMRR belonged to national roads. Later, the Ministry of Public Works Decree Number
365 in 2009 decided the road administration as follows:-Mastrip: Provincial Road
-Kenjeran, Margomulyo, and EMRR: National Roads
Although the agreement of Feedback Seminar was held for Mastrip and EMRR, Kenjeran and-12-Margomulyo changed to national roads. However, this is the decision of administrators and theoperation and maintenance of each road category are set as follows in principal.
Table 10 Responsible Organization for Road MaintenanceClassification
Administrator

National
Provincial
City
Ministry
Province
City
City Dept. of Gardening and Cleaning
Cleaning/Street Light/Gardening
City Dept. of Roads and Bridges
Operation and Emergency Repair (Emergency, Pothole)Road Executing Provincial Public City Public Works
MaintenanceRoutine Repair(Patch, Pothole）
AgencyWorks Dept.
Dept.
(Example)
Heavy Maintenance (Overlay, Expansion）

Source: Monitoring Survey.

Under the Ministry of Public Works, the Road Executing Agency Area 5 (Balai Besar
Palaksanaan Jalan Area 5) is conducting routine maintenance of national roads with the city.
Road and Bridge Maintenance Division, Road and Bridge Department of City holds 20 staff
and 50 workers, inclusive of outsourcing, are regularly engaged in road maintenance operation.
3.3.1.2 Drainage
Brantas River Basin Management Office (Balai Besar Wilayah Sungai (BBWS) Brantas)
under Ministry of Public Works is maintaining the drainage. BBWS has 526 civil servants and345 outsourced workers and 60 civil servants and 17 outsourced workers are engaged indrainage maintenance.
Among drainage maintenance, Drainage Department of City also works for dredging andremoval of aquatic plants and operation of pumping stations. If BBWS has sufficient budget, itis prioritized. Next to it, the city budget is to be expended. Drainage Department of City has six
civil servants and 375 outsourced workers responsible for operation and maintenance.
3.3.1.3 Solid Waste
Surabaya City Department of Gardening and Cleaning is operating and maintaining thevehicles and facilities procured by this project. The Department has 621 civil servants and 71
outsourced workers.
3.3.1.4 Water Supply
Surabaya Regional Drinking Water Company (PDAM) is responsible for the implementationof the components in water supply sector of this project and operation and maintenance.
Distribution Maintenance Departments are organized for each eastern and western zone taking
charge of respective operation and management tasks
Therefore, the responsible organization is clarified for operation and maintenance by eachsector and there is no particular problem.
-13-

3.3.2 Technical Aspect of Operation and Maintenance3.3.2.1 Urban Roads
City department has no clear technical classification for maintenance staff and technicalcapacity cannot be confirmed. City outsources some maintenance operation and outsourced
companies are conducting training.
3.3.2.2 Drainage
Removal of aquatic plants and canal dredging are the main task of operation and maintenance.
BBWS and City department are conducting training for both civil servants and outsourced staff.
3.3.2.3 Solid Waste
The City department conducts training for permanent staff on solid waste depots.
The department also trains garbage truck drivers when they start their jobs.
3.3.2.4 Water Supply
When new pump operators are recruited, PDAM conducts training to them based on manuals
prepared by pump makers. PDAM’s Distribution Maintenance Department conducts training of
its staff for daily maintenance of water pipes.
By these facts, it is confirmed that a certain level of training has been conducted but it is not
sure that the technical level has been sufficiently achieved to the current required standard
including outsourced staff.
3.3.3 Financial Aspect of Operation and Maintenance3.3.3.1 Urban Roads
The City has annual budget for road maintenance of Rp. 20 billion. It is judged that the scaleof this budget is sufficient for the responsible maintenance operation. However, the maintenancecost may rise as the traffic volume increases.
3.3.3.2 Drainage
There has been no user charge for drainage. The BBWS expends Rp. 450 million annually forthree components under the project. BBWS is a national organization and the budget is secured
from the national budget. The maintenance cost, however, may increase as a result of the
progress of urban development and other factors.

-14-

3.3.3.3 Solid Waste
The City collects monthly Rp. 500 from low income households and Rp. 12,000 from otherhouseholds per household for solid waste discharge (Mayor Regulation 57/2001). Although total
amount collected is not clear, the amount is below initial estimation. The shortage is covered by
City budget according to Department of Gardening and Cleaning. However, the recycling
activity is not so active that waste discharge may increase in future resulting in an increase infinancial assistance from the city.
3.3.3.4 Water Supply
PDAM reported that the operation and maintenance cost for each facility is not clear, but its
revenue comes from water usage and the financial standing of PDAM is good.
3.3.4 Current Status of Operation and Maintenance3.3.4.1 Urban Roads
During field survey, it was observed that the roads were maintained in good condition. The
road sections under this project have high traffic volume but there is no problem with roadsurfaces. However, some sections have not been swept properly.
3.3.4.2 Drainage
BBWS conducts removal of aquatic plants and cleaning twice a year. The target areas of the
project are maintained in good condition. BBWS conducts dredging as necessary.
3.3.4.3 Solid Waste
During field survey, it was observed that the facilities and trucks are maintained in goodcondition.
3.3.4.4 Water Supply
During field survey, it was observed that the pump stations and pipes are maintained in goodcondition.

-15-

Photo 1 Urban Road: Kenjeran Road

Photo 2 Drainage: Kubong Agung Canal

Photo 3 Solid Waste: Garbage Truck

Photo 4 Water Supply: Wonocolo Pump Station

Therefore, although there is no involvement of the executing agency, the responsibility ofoperation and maintenance of each component of this project is clearly defined by eachorganization by sector. The City’s responsible area has expanded from the time of appraisal.
There is no specific concern in structural aspects of sustainability because Surabaya City andother organizations clearly implement each responsibility and prepare maintenance budgets
accordingly. On the other hand, the sectors supported by national and city budget, especiallyurban roads, drainage and solid waste, hold risks which endanger financial sustainability
through the increase of cost and deterioration of financial balance.
4. Conclusion, Recommendation and Lessons Learned
4.1 Conclusion
Uncompleted sections and non-operational sections after completion at the time of ex-post
evaluation have been in service and used effectively. There is no particular problem in operationand maintenance structure because responsible organizations are currently clearly defined. The
recommendations by ex-post evaluation are steadily implemented in the clarification of road
operation and maintenance organization and record keeping of flooding and inundation.
-16-

4.2 Recommendation
Not applicable.
4.3 Lessons Learned
The system of local governance in Indonesia greatly changed from the time of appraisal to thepresent. Especially, the Decentralization Law (1999) and its revision in 2004 expanded the
responsible area of cities and influenced the project. Therefore, for future projects, not limited toIndonesia, it should be considered that the proper implementation structure, such as setting a
local government as an executing agency or involvement of a local government from an initialstage, depending on the situation of roles between national and local governments and projectcontents for multi-sectorial infrastructure projects in specific areas. This will facilitate theproject implementation and follow-up.

-17-

Comparison of Planned and Actual Scope
Item
1.Output
Urban Roads

Drainage

Solid Waste

PlannedActual・Construction of EMRR I
・Construction of EMRR・Improvement of Kenjeran Rd.
・Improvement of Kenjeran Rd.
・Improvement of Banyu Urip Rd.
・Improvement of Margomulyo Rd.
・Improvement of Margomulyo
・Improvement of Mastrip Rd.
Second Carriageway
・Construction of (EMRR II) &BridgeTotal Length
Total Length
Construction 2,850 m
Construction 15,265 m
Improvement 15,843 m
Improvement 10,720 m
・Improvement of Perbatasan River・Improvement of Perbatasan
River・Improvement of Kebonagung・Improvement of Kebonagung
Canal
Canal
Total canal length: 29.4 km
Total canal length: 26.8 km
Total pond area: 80.7 ha
Total pond area 28 ha
・Collection equipment (Trucks
・Collection equipment (Trucks etc.)
etc.)
・Landfill equipment
・Landfill equipment
・Civil work projects

Water Supply

・Transmission/Primary/Secondary Water Supply andDistribution Pipelines
・Secondary Distribution (steel
pipe)・Pipe Materials for Reservoir
・Tertiary Distribution Mains
・House Connections
・Wonocolo Pump Station
・Putat Gede Distribution Facilities
Installations

2.Period

February 1993- March 2001
(8 years one month)

3.CostForeign
Currency
Local Currency
Total(Japanese ODA
Loan Portion)
Exchange Rate

4,959 million yen

・Mostly as planned with differencein quantity
・Takeover of the uncompleted
IBRD portion-Pipe installation connecting
Wonocolo Pump Station toexisting ESRM
-Connection from ESRM to
Keneran Rd-Connection of uncompleted
ESRM portion to Wadung Asli Rungkut
February 1993- March 2004
(11 years and one month with some
portion uncompleted)

10,643 million yen
15,602 million yen
11,251 million yen(Breakdown is unavailable between
foreign and local currency
portions.)
13,196 million yen
10,893 million yen

Rp. 1= 0.064 yen(as of 1992)

Rp. 1= 0.017 yen (simple averageduring 1994 - 2004)-18-