The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence
Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism
KIM Bong-jin

1. Foreword
The Xing Zhonghui 興中会 （Revive China Society） started by Sun
Yat-sen（1866-1925）and Wang Zhaoming 汪兆銘（Wang Jingwei, 1883-1944）
merged with the Hua Xinghui 華興会 established by Song Jiaoren 宋教仁（1882-1913）and Huang Xing 黄興（1874-1916）on August 20, 1905 in Tokyo
to become the Zhongguo Tongmenghui 同盟会 （Chinese Revolutionary
Alliance）. Sun Yat-sen was selected to head the organization, and Huang Xing
to run general affairs. Various documents were adopted, including the “military government proclamation,” “general articles of the Tongmenghui,” and“revolutionary strategy.” The Tongmenghui issued as their organizational
publication the Minbao 民報, which adopted the general principles advocatedby Sun of “expel the Manchus and restore China, establish a republic, andequalize land rights.” Subsequently, they fomented uprisings all over China,
but all ended in failure.
The Wuchang New Army successfully revolted against the Qing government on October 10, 1911. Other provinces followed suit by declaring independence from the central government. On January 1, 1912 the Provisional
Government of the Republic of China was established in Nanjing, with Sun
Yat-sen as provisional president. On February 12, however, Yuan Shikai（1859-1916）compelled the child emperor Puyi（1906-1967）to abdicate. The
next day Sun Yat-sen turned in his resignation as president and recommended
to the provisional National Assembly that Yuan take the position. On
February 15 the provisional National Assembly agreed on Yuan’s appointment
and to designate Nanjing as the capital. On March 8 the Provisional
Constitution of the Republic of China was drawn up. On March 10 Yuan
* Professor of international relations and comparative thought at the Universityof Kitakyushu

20

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

Shikai was appointed second provisional president in Beijing, and the nextday, the Provisional Constitution was promulgated.
In February 1913, a national election was held in accordance with thestipulations contained in the Provisional Constitution. The Kuomintang won
the most votes, and Song Jiaoren was put forward as candidate for prime
minister by the National Assembly.1 On March 20, however, Song was assassinated in Shanghai on Yuan Shikai’s orders. Sun Yat-sen and his revolutionist faction attempted an armed uprising against Yuan’s Beiyang
Government, but were quickly quashed（The Second Revolution）. In 1914
Yuan abolished the Provisional Constitution and strengthened presidential
powers. He made himself emperor in 1915, which proved to be a fiasco, andin June of the following year, died of illness. Li Yuanhong 黎元洪（18641928）, who was installed as president after Yuan’s death, announced the reinstatement of the Provisional Constitution, but lost power the following year.
Subsequently, the Beiyang Government led politics in a direction thatdiverged from what the revolutionists had intended.2
Sun Yat-sen exiled to Japan after the Second Revolution. He organized
the Chinese Revolutionary Party in Tokyo in 1914, and on September 10,
1917 established the Chinese Nationalist Military Government（Kwangtung
Constitutional Protection Government）. Sun was appointed as generalissimo
and began a movement to “protect the Provisional Constitution.” This initiated the second phase of the Republican Revolution. The May Fourth
Movement occurred during this period.
The above survey of historical developments in China’s revolution indicates several points of similarity with Korea’s contemporaneous independence
movement. China and Korea were in very similar revolutionary circumstances
as a result of certain interweaving chain events. Yet no research has been
done on these similarities. One of the most important reasons for this lacuna
is the tendency in historical research on East Asia toward national historicalperspectives and unilateralism（national particularism）. Research on regional
history and comparative history is necessary to eliminate this problem.
This paper examines the relationship between the 1911 Revolution and
the Korean Independence Movement. First, the secret society Sinminhoe 新民会（New People’s Association）, will be discussed, including Cho Sǒng-huan
1 The Kuomintang, which was established in Beijing on August 25, 1912,
proposed that Sun Yat-sen be party leader, but in actuality, Song Jiaoren held
power.
2 The Beiyang Government enacted the Constitution of the Republic of China,also called the Cao Kun 曹錕（1862-1938）Constitution, on October 10, 1923,
after which it abolished the Provincial Constitution.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 21
曹成煥（1875-1948）, who was in charge of the Beijing headquarters, and his
approach to the revolutionary situation in China. Next, the activities of
Korea’s independence fighter, Sin Gyu-sik 申圭植（1880-1922）, who exiled toChina, will receive focus. Lastly, a comparison will be made of the similarities between the Provisional Constitution of the Republic of China and that of
the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea organized in Shanghai
after the Samil（March 1）Movement, and of the philosophical foundations of
the “democratic republics” chosen by both countries.

2. Cho Sǒng-huan and Events Surrounding China’s Revolution
The 1911 Revolution and its aftermath had a tremendous impact on the
Korean Independence Movement. The “independence” in “independence
movement” implies revolution; the 1911 Revolution was a good model for
Korea’s independence movement. Korea entered a type of revolutionary state
when it was annexed in August 1910 by Japan. Actually, it could be said thatthe revolution had already begun when Korea became a protectorate of Japanthrough the Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905 in November of that year. In particular, when Emperor Kojong 高宗皇帝（1852-1919, reigned 1863-1907）was
forcibly abdicated on July 24, 1907, the momentum of the independence
movement shifted from the Constitutionalists to the Revolutionists. The
Sinminhoe secret society was emblematic of this shift.
The Siminhoe was proposed by An Chang-ho 安昌浩（1878-1938）, who
had returned from the United States in February 1907, and was created byseven individuals, including Yang Gi-tak 梁起鐸（1871-1938）, Yi Dong-nyǒng
李東寧（1869-1940）, and Yi Dong-hui 李東輝（1873 - 1935）. Yang Gi-tak was
general manager, Yi Dong-nyǒng was elected general secretary, and An
Chang-ho was executive officer of the organization. They adopted such documents as “Prospectus for the Sinminhoe 大韓新民会趣旨書,” and “Applied
Articles for the Sinminhoe 大韓新民会通用章程.” Chapter 2, Clause 1 in the
Applied Articles for the Sinminhoe declares: “We will reform the corrupt
thoughts and customs of our Korea and restore the people….we will develop
a restored free and civilized country.” This “free and civilized country” refers
to an “independent country with a republican form of government.” That is,
the Sinminhoe was a revolutionary organization that aimed at a republican
revolution.
In March 1910, the Sinminhoe decided to exile several of its leadersabroad. The exiled leaders would establish themselves in separate areas. For
example, An Chang-ho would exile to the United States, Yi Dong-nyǒng to
the Russian coastal area（Primorsky Krai）, Yi Dong-hui to Manchuria, and
Cho Sǒng-huan to the branch headquarters in Beijing and other Chinese
cities. Their foreign exile began in April of that year. More than ten of the22

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

exiled vanguard leaders, including An Chang-ho and Sin Chae-ho 申采浩（1880 - 1936）met in Qingdao in April to discuss a strategy for achieving theirgoals. The strategy chosen was An Chang-ho’s plan to build a new Koreanvillage and military academy.
Beginning in January, 1911, however, the Japanese Government-Generalof Korea rounded up groups of people in Hwanghae Province 黄海道 whowere considered to require observation. In September patriots such as theSinminhoe’s general director, Yang Gi-tak, and other central leaders as well as
regional members, were arrested, ostensibly for violating the security law. The
Government-General, which had ferreted out the Sinminhoe organization,
again made arrests in May of 1912, this time of Sinminhoe leaders andmembers throughout the country（the “105 Incident”）. The Sinminhoe wasthus effectively destroyed within Korea. Korea at that time entered an evendarker period under the military regime imposed by the Japanese
Government-General. Perhaps this is why there are no indications of discussion, meetings, or secret societies, even though the 1911 Revolution and its
aftermath certainly must have had a tremendous impact on the independence
movement within Korea.
What response did the Korean independence fighters exiled in China haveto the 1911 Revolution and revolutionary events? Some indication can bediscerned from part of a letter sent from Cho Sǒng-huan to An Chang-ho.3
The letter, stamped October 21, 1911 （August 30 by the lunar calendar）,
eleven days after the Wuchang Uprising, describes the attitudes of various
national envoys toward the revolution: “the Japanese, Russians, and others
proposed negotiations, but the British, American, and French envoys opposed
the idea, and proclaimed neutrality. They have sent military observers.” The
Japanese side, however, on the one hand would “encourage the revolutionary
party and firmly make them resist the government,” while on the other would“encourage the [Qing] government and requested permission to do mopping
up operations.”（p.582）
After repeating the content of the letter of the previous day, a letter stamped
October 22 described in detail the fluctuations in internal and external affairsof the Qing government. The Korean revolutionists expressed deep emotion
toward the revolutionary army of China: “we have great hopes, but wonder
when such a day will come for us” （p. 589）. Cho had praised the 1911
3 Twenty-five of the letters（1, 174 - 198）from Cho Sǒng-huan to An Chang-ho
are collected in the second volume of Dosan An Chang-ho jǒnzip 島山安昌浩
全集, compiled by the editorial committee of Dosan An Chang-ho sǒn saengjǒnzip 島山安昌浩先生全集編纂委員会編, （Seoul: Dongyang Publishing, Ltd.
2000）.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 23

Revolution as a “great hope,” which he described in a letter marked October
26 thusly: ‘The National Revolutionary Army’ is moral in their dealings,
adept at diplomacy, and perfect in their facilities.” “From now on, it willprobably become a model for the Chinese civil war.” （pp. 591 - 592）. He
subsequently lamented, “We don’t have enough capability yet, so we cannot
express any empathy even if given the opportunity. This is truly distressing.”（p. 594）
After the success of the Wuchang Uprising, the Qing government
suppressed the Beiyang Army’s insurgency and reinstated Yuan Shikai, who
had been dismissed earlier from his position as Viceroy of Zhili. On October
22, Hunan declared independence, followed by Jiangxi the next day. On
October 27, Yuan was appointed Imperial Inspector Minister and began his
invasion of Wuhan. On November 1, the Qing government appointed Yuan
Shikai as Premier.4 Cho predicted presciently in a letter marked November 15（September 15 by the lunar calendar）: “Yuan Shikai has organized a new
cabinet; no matter how clever the measures or how much they reform theadministration, the three party factions（Sun Yat-sen’s Revolutionary Party,
Kang [You-wei]’s and Liang [Qiqiao]’s Constitutional Party, and Yuan
Shikai’s Government Party）, close cooperation among them will be difficult,and there is no hope that the civil war will subside.”（p. 598）
Meanwhile, Shanghai was retroceded on November 3; Zhejiang declared
independence on November 4 and Jiangsu on November 5, followed bydeclarations of independence by one province after another. Cho, whoconveyed this news in his letter marked November 20（September 30 by the
lunar calendar）, reported that wanting to receive “great empathy” from the
Revolutionists, he wished to sow the seeds of “eternal mutual help toward ourcountry in its entirety.”（p. 605）In the letter postmarked two days later, Cho,
who came from a family of military officers, appealed: “I think it reasonable
and appropriate to devote ourselves to this country, so I request my petition
be granted.” （p. 615） Cho had the intention of participating in the 1911
Revolution.5
Once revolutionary governments were set up in every province in China,
the establishment of a unified government became imperative. On November
9, Li Yuanhong appealed to have the representatives of each province sent toWuchang. This appeal was the strategy of Song Jiaoren, but on the following
4 Two days after Yuan attacked Hankou, however, he tried secretly to conduct
peace deliberations with the Hubei Military Government.
5 It cannot be concluded that Cho participated directly in the 1911 Revolution,
but it can be said that he participated indirectly. This is also true of Sin
Gyu-sik.

24

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

day, Song left Wuchang for Nanjing. On the other hand, Chen Qimei 陳其美（1878 - 1916）, Governor-General of Shanghai, who, like Song, was a leader in
the Central League of the Tongmenghui,6 on November 11 asked that representatives from each province be sent to Shanghai. On November 15, a
meeting was convened in Shanghai, and a representative federation wasestablished of governors-general from each province.
On November 23, however, the Hubei military government in Wuchangreacted against the actions taken by participants at the Shanghai meeting. As
a result, representatives from each province proceeded to Wuchang. In themeantime, Yuan Shikai presented to the Hubei military government three
conditions for reconciliation: “a ceasefire; abdication of the Xuantong
emperor （Puyi）; and the appointment of Yuan Shikai as president.” On
December 1, the two sides signed the “Wuhan Regional Ceasefire
Agreement.” In the Wuchang meeting held on December 2, a provisional
government organization outline was approved, and at the same time Yuan
was confirmed as candidate for provisional president. The next day, a resolution was passed to enact general provisions article 21, chapter 3, and a policyof democratic republicanism with a presidency was confirmed. It was stipulated that they would convene in Nanjing within a week and that an election
for provisional president would be held. Yuan appointed Tang Shaoyi 唐紹儀（1862 - 1938） representative plenipotentiary on December 8 and held talks
with Li Yuanhong and representatives from all of the provinces in Hankou.
Cho visited Beijing during this turbulent period to meet with Sin Gyu-sik,
whom he had already met while living in the same military academy in the
Republic of Korea. In a letter postmarked December 11（October 21 by the
lunar calendar）, Cho relayed information on Yuan’s dispatch of Tang Shaoyi
and other events in China, after which he said that he and Sin Gyu-sik had“resolved to move south and are leaving tomorrow.” “If battles continue, I’ll
leave a token of my regard by firing just a single shot. If there is reconciliation, I intend to subsidize them [the revolutionists] with a thousand yuan orso worth of military provisions. The amount of cash that Brother Sin broughtwith him would cover that.”（pp. 618 - 619）. As Cho said, he went with Sin
to Nanjing, and then on to Shanghai, where he made friends with the leadersand other people in the revolutionary faction, thereby building deeper relations with them.
The next time Cho wrote a letter was on February 4, 1912（December 15
by the lunar calendar）. The situation in China during that interim had
6 The Central League of the Tongmenghui was established in Shanghai on July
31, 1911. As a result of the election, five people, including Song Jiaoren andChen Qimei, were elected general secretary.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 25changed: Sun Yat-sen had returned to China on December 25, and on
December 29, the election for provisional president had been held in Nanjing.
On January 1, 1912 Sun Yat-sen was thus able to proclaim the founding of the
Republic of China. Hearing of this event, Cho extolled the founding of the
Republic in his letter marked February 4: “There are many joyful events that
I have seen and heard about since arriving here at the beginning of themonth. Besides the four provinces of Zhili, Shandong, Shanxi, and Henan,
fourteen other provinces have already joined the Republic. Sun Yat-sen has
been elected Provisional President. Everything is proceeding along well day
by day. This is fortuitous not only for China but for all of Asia, including ourcountry.”（p. 624）.
Cho’s praise of the founding of the Republic of China continues in his
letter marked February 20, 1912（January 3 by the lunar calendar）, in which
he wrote: “Five thousand years of autocratic government by the old empire
have been overthrown, and a dazzling republican government has been established on the six lands of China….This is a great success created by the
Chinese Republic, a new light in Asian history; it is terrifying to the powerfulneighbors that surround us.”（pp.632 - 633）He also said, “It is a success for
China, which advocated freedom on the Asian mainland, and it is a successthat the revolutionary ideas that had been nearly eradicated have been roused
again in the peoples on the Bando Kangsan [Korean Peninsula].” Hecontinued, “So long as we bravely proceed toward our goal without losing
our spirit, we will destroy the devil on our peninsula. I am confident that thetime is not far away when the days will be bright again.”（p. 633）. By thisexpression, Cho was referring to his belief in the recovery of his homelandfrom the Japanese.
Cho also wrote: “when we visited important personages in Nanjing…they
expressed their limitless welcome and gratitude, and treated us as if we werefamily,” so in return, “Brother Sin sent several hundred yuan of our left-overtravel money to supplement their military expenses. We expressed in writing
to Huang Xing the spirit of our people.” In response, “Huang Xing wrote,‘Allies and true gentlemen are perpetually helping us to be successful, andtogether we will enjoy each other’s freedom and happiness.’”（pp. 634 - 635）.
Cho wrote that they had joined the “foreign group” of the Tongmenghui, andthat they “had long since become members of the Freedom Party, andplanned to join the Republican Constitutional Party shortly.”（p.630）7
7 The Freedom Party was formed in Shanghai on February 3, 1912, but was
disbanded on August 30, 1913 by the capital administrative police department.
The Republican Constitution Committee was established at the end of
December, 1911 in Shanghai by Wu Tingfang 伍廷芳（1842 - 1922）. It was a

26

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

Cho said that he was encouraged by “several people” among the revolutionists: “If you establish your organization in various areas of China, contact
comrades in your external regions, and travel together with us in perpetuity
through thick and thin, there will be no hindrances or difficulties; we can
expect that you will achieve great success within the space of a decade.”（p.630）Sin Gyu-sik remained in the area in accordance with this arrangement. “Older brother Sin is still in this land, diligently working on fostering
new contacts, and trying to build a solid organization.”（p.630）Cho returned
to Beijing and engaged in the work of forming a network with comrades forsome time.8

3. The Chinese Revolution and Sin Gyu-sik
It can be discerned from some of Sin Gyu-sik’s poems in his Chinese
poetry anthology, Amoknu 児目涙（A Child’s Tears）, that Sin exiled himself in
China in the latter half of November, 1911.9 That is, Sin exiled to China after
the success of the Wuchang Uprising and in the midst of the 1911
Revolution. He visited Cho Sǒng-huan in Beijing on December 11. Thus, thestatement by Min Pil-ho 閔弼鎬（1897 - 1963）in his Yegwan Sin Gyu-sik sǒn
saeng jǒngi 睨観申圭植先生伝記（Biography of Mr. Sin Gyu-sik）that “After
traveling to China, Mr. Sin changed his name to Sin-sŏng, joined theTongmenghui and participated in the Wuchang Uprising under President Sun
Yat-sen’s direction” is incorrect.10 However, considering that Sin and Cho bothjoined the “foreign group” of the Tongmenghui, it’s possible that this is notentirely a mistake.
As mentioned above, Sin built close contacts with important people in
the revolutionary group, a fact that can be ascertained in many of the Chinese
poems in his A Child’s Tears. For example, the poem, “Bokǒm” 宝剣comparatively moderate group within the revolutionary faction.
8 In July, 1912, however, Cho’s plan to assassinate Katsura Tarō 桂太郎（1848 1913）on the latter’s way to Europe via the Trans-Siberian Railroad failed.
Cho was arrested by the Japanese police and sent back home. As soon as Cho
was released a year after being punished with exile on Kǒje Island 巨済島 off
the southern coast of Korea, he again took up exile in China.
9 While Sin was in self-imposed exile in China, he wrote over 140 Chinese poems
and 19 panegyrics. Sin’s son-in-law, Min Pil-ho 閔弼鎬（1897-1963）, titled thecollection A Child’s Tears. When Min published his own book, Han-Jung
Oegyosahwa（A Sino-Korean Diplomatic History）韓中外交史話 in 1942 in
China, he included A Child’s Tears in it.
10 Min Pil-ho, Yegwan Sin Gyu-sik sǒn saeng jǒngi（Biography of Mr. Sin Gyu-sik）;
Si Yuan-hua 石源華 & Kim Chun- yǒp 金俊燁 eds., Sin Gyu-sik, Min Pil-ho wa
Han-jung kwangye 申圭植・閔弼鎬와 韓中関係,（Sin Gyu-sik, Min Pil-ho andKorea-China Relations）（Seoul: Nanam Publishing Co., 2003）.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 27（“Treasured Sword”）; the two poems, “Jǔng Huang Keqiang” 贈黄克強（“ToHuang Keqiang [Xing]”）; and the poem, “Man Huang Keqiang” 挽黄克強（“Panegyric to Huang Xing”）are four such poems included in the collection.

The “writings” that appear in Cho’s letter postmarked February 20, 1912 to
Huang Xing quoted earlier are thought to refer to the two poems “To Huang
Keqiang,” or at least to one of them. The first poem is:
The righteous drums sound, chariots at the four borders;The high winds reach the Central Plains in October.
Under the sun the fireflies and grasses add not a little;
The horses on the riverside have heartfelt calls for revolution.
The mainland welcomes the spring, proclaiming virtue.
Qingshan wept bitter tears; the night summoned the souls,
The Han thrived and the Qin was destroyed, but there is justice;
Since that time who has known of the Lord Cang Hai（滄海君）?
Sin likened Huang Xing to Lord Cang Hai（the robust man of Cang Hai
who is said to have thrown a mallet and hit Emperor Qinshi Huang [259-210
BC]）.
The second poem is:
The mountains and rivers meet and are recast,
The days and months appear new;Success and achievement cannot be taken from
A great man in history.
Here Sin pays tribute to Huang as “a great man in history.” It should be
noted that “Panegyric to Huang Xing” was composed on October 31, 1916
upon the death of Huang Xing.
Sin also sent two Chinese poems to Sun Yat-sen. The first one reads:
The Republic ushers in a new era,
Refashioning the old heaven and earth,
The peoples of the Four Seas are joyous.
Long live Sun Yat-sen!
The second poem from “To Sun Yat-sen” reads:
The thorny travails of heaven and earth
Are all but gone;
The mountain paths bordering the Chu
Are uneven,
Blood and steel, a strong place, virtuously
Facing the sun,Tens of thousands are of one voice.
Sin met Sun Yat-sen in Shanghai on April 17, 1912. An article entitled“Encomium to Sun Yat-sen, composed by the Korean XX,” carried in the
Minquanbao 民権報 dated April 18 of the same year, is thought to have been

28

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012penned by Sin. The article states, “I heard news that Sun Yat-sen traveledthrough Shanghai and has gone again to Guangdong. I wanted to meet him,
so I went to the Huizhong Inn last night. Just then, I met Hu Hanmin 胡漢民（1879-1936）, and Sun Yat-sen, who had just returned from outside….Hu
Hanmin asked me to join them in the elevator and go to Sun’s room. Sun
asked me to sit down, but I continued to stand, chanting, “Long Live theRepublic of China! Long Live the first president of Asia!”
According to his Chinese elegy, Do gou hyǒra-kun（“Mourning the Deathof My Old Friend, Xue’er,”）in A Child’s Tears, the first Chinese whom Sin
befriended in Shanghai was Xu Xue’er 徐血児, a journalist for Minlibao 民立
報 who later became secretary to Song Jiaoren.11 In the elegy, which Sin
wrote on the death of Xu, he added, “Xue’er, I traveled incognito from theyear of the 1911 Revolution from the ancient capital across the seas; the next
day you were the first person who befriended me.” In other words, the day
after Sin traveled from the old capital of Nanjing to Shanghai during the yearof the 1911 Revolution（thought to be sometime in the middle of February,1912）, Xu was the first person with whom Sin made friends.
Sin also built a close relationship with Dai Jitao 戴季陶 （1891-1949;
pseudonym Tian Qiu）of the Minquanbao.12 For example, there is a Chinese
poem in A Child’s Tears called “To Tian Qiu.” In the poem Sin uses a metaphor for himself, as follows: “Gazing wistfully at the evening swan,” whilelamenting, “the future is as a thousand waves, ten thousand valleys.” This
poem was printed by Dai Jitao in the April 10, 1912 edition of theMinquanbao with the commentary, “The author of this poem is a patriot from
Korea, a country now in ruins; he has gone into exile in China and is
working himself to death in the independence movement. When we read his
poem, we collapse in tears. Eventually we, too, might tread in the tracks of
Korea.”
Another classical Chinese poem in A Child’s Tears is “To Song Yufu 宋
漁夫 [Song Jiaoren; yufu means ‘fisherman’]”:
Political storms have opened the curtain of revolution,
The snow and moon satisfy the fisherman on the shore.
On this day of Han fortune and China’s rejuvenation
We have not yet taken revenge upon the enemy of Qin.
The strong pine can know contentment,
11 The Minlibao was launched in early spring, 1912 by Yu Youren 于右任（18791964）and Zhang Shizhao 章士釗（1881-1973）; it was the newspaper of theCentral League of the Tongmenghui.
12 The Minquanbao was launched on March 28, 1912 by Dai Jitao, a member of
the Tongmenghui and Sun Yat-sen’s secretary from that year.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 29

We will still grieve even after the yellow ape perishes.
The dragon hall will remember
The blood and tears of a man from Chŏnggu [Korea].
To paraphrase, Sin is saying that the curtain of the revolution has opened, andChina’s fortune has been to celebrate a day of rejuvenation, while Korea
grieves that the Japanese are still in their country and that Korea has not yet
been able to take revenge. This represents Sin Gyu-sik’s own feelings. AfterSong was assassinated, Sin attended his funeral in Shanghai, where hedisplayed his tribute, drawing the attention of those around him.13 Sin also
wrote the elegy, “With respect to his friend, from a sentimental man fromChŏnggu.” Sin read this poem when Chen Qimei was assassinated on May 18,
1916. In the elegy, Sin laments the death of Chen Qimei and expresses hisanxiety about the many difficulties that lie ahead for the Chinese revolution
and the Republic.
Sin organized the Dongjaesa 同済社（Mutual Assistance Society）on July4, 1912 in Shanghai. The central figures in the Society were the illustrious
independence fighters, Sin, Pak Un-sik 朴殷植（1859-1925）, Kim Gyu-sik 金奎植（1881-1950）, and Sin Chae-ho, as well as many study-abroad students,
according to Min Pil-ho（Biography of Mr. Sin Gyu-sik, p.266）.14 Min Pil-ho
also states that “The Korean and Chinese patriots joined forces, and in orderto foster friendship between the two peoples, promoted organization of a new
Asian Mutual Assistance Society.” “Song Yufu, Chen Yingshi 陳英士 [Qimei],
Hu Hanmin, Dai Jitao, and…Chen Guofu 陳果夫（1892-1951）” were among
the promoters of the new Asian society（pp. 266-267）.
In 1913, however, the close relationship that Sin and the others had builtwith the revolutionaries received several serious blows. Song Jiaoren was
assassinated on March 20 of that year, a setback that was followed by the
failure of Sun Yat-sen’s Second Revolution in July. Sun, Huang Xing, Chen
Qimei, and the other revolutionaries fled to Japan. In July, 1914 they formed
the Zhonghua Gemingdang 中華革命党 （Chinese Revolutionary Party） inTokyo, and continued their fight against Yuan Shikai. In December, 1915
Chen Qimei, who was the head of the Chinese Revolutionary Party, returned
to China and raised an army in Shanghai（the Third Revolution）but it, too,
13 Bae Gyŏng-han 裵京漢, Sonmun gwa Hanguk 孫文과 韓国（Sun Yat-sen and
Korea）,（Seoul: Toseo Chulban Hanul Publishing Co. 図書出版한울）, 2007, p.
59.
14 Major members of the Mutual Assistance Society became leading figures in theProvisional Government of the Republic of Korea that was organized about
seven years later. In that sense, it could be said that the Mutual AssistanceSociety was a precursor organization to the Provisional Government of the
Republic of Korea.

30

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

ended in failure. Then on May 18, 1916, Chen was also assassinated. Huang
Xing continued planning various strategies, but died of illness on October 31of the same year.
At the end of 1914, Sin and the other leaders of the Mutual AssistanceSociety were searching for new strategies for the independence movement,
and had already begun the work of organizing the Sinhan Hyǒkmyongdang
新韓革命党（New Korean Revolutionary Party）. From the name of the party,
it can be surmised that Sin was influenced by the Chinese Revolutionary
Party. If that is the case, then it can be assumed that some of the goals of
forming the New Korean Revolutionary Party were to join in solidarity with
the Chinese Revolutionary Party in their move against Yuan Shikai and tosupport their actions. But events took a different turn; the First World War
that broke out in July of that year and the worsening of Sino-Japanese relations precluded this development. As soon as the war broke out, Japan sent
soldiers to the Shandong Peninsula with the aim of taking over German interests there, and in August issued a proclamation of war against Germany. At
the beginning of 1915, Japan submitted the 21 Demands to the Beiyang
Government with the intention of destroying Chinese sovereignty, offering in
return support for Yuan Shikai becoming emperor.
In March 1915, the leading independence fighter Yi Sang-sǒl 李相卨（1870-1917） visited Shanghai.15 Under Yi’s influence, the New Korean
Revolutionary Party that was formed in March established its headquarters in
Beijing. Yi was elected head of the party, Pak Un-sik director of party headquarters, and Sǒng Nak-hyong 成楽馨（birth and death unknown）, head offoreign relations. Leadership rights of the party organization were entrusted to
the Beijing headquarters. Shanghai became one branch, and Sin Gyu-sik was
selected as branch leader. The activities of the Beijing headquarters, however,took an unexpected turn. Predicting “German victory, and post-victory a
Sino-German alliance in a war against Japan, resulting in Korean independence,” the Korean party planned to conclude an anti-Japanese military agreement with Germany and a Sino-Korean Treaty of Amity with the Beiyang
Government.
Germany was a monarchy at the time, while Yuan Shikai was scheming
to be enthroned as emperor. The headquarters in Beijing thus tried to obtain a
15 Yi Sang-sǒl exiled overseas in 1906, traveling through Shanghai and
Vladivostok to the Russian territory Primorsky Krai, and from there to Gando
間島（Jiandao）where he opened an ethnic Korean school and a base for the
independence movement. He was also a pioneer independence fighter. In thespring of 1907, he received a secret order from Emperor Kojong and was sent
to the peace conference at the Hague. He was one of the three secret Koreanemissaries who petitioned for Korean independence.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 31

secret order or permission from Emperor Kojong to organize a provisional
government, while simultaneously obtaining recognition from China andGermany to form a tripartite alliance. Operations for obtaining a secret orderfrom Emperor Kojong were to be undertaken by Sǒng Nak-hyong, head offoreign relations. Sǒng secretly entered Korea in July, 1915 and tried to carryout his mission but was arrested; his mission ended in failure. Not only did
the plans of the Beijing headquarters dissipate, but the very existence of the
New Korean Revolutionary Party became imperiled and in fact, the Partysoon disbanded.
Although the Party was dissolved, the Party’s plan to organize a provisional government survived. Sin Gyu-sik and the other leaders of the Mutual
Assistance Society organized the Daedong bogukdan 大同輔国団（Union for
Helping the Nation）in 1915 in Shanghai. In July 1917, the Daedong Unity
Proclamation 大同団結宣言 was promulgated under the names of fourteen
members, including Sin Gyu-sik, Pak Un-sik, Cho Sǒng-huan, and Kim
Gyu-sik. The proclamation aimed for the “birth of a new Korea” throughunity of independence fighters and groups within and outside the country. The
general provisions were comprised of seven articles. Article 1 stated, “We willorganize a peerless, supreme institution,” while Article 3 proposed, “We will
enact a great constitution and implement a constitutional government befitting
a civil government,” etc. In other words, they established a unified organization for an independence movement that was to be a provisional government,with the aim of creating a democratic republic.
At the same time, Sin Gyu-sik and other leaders of the Mutual AssistanceSociety learned that the Stockholm Conference was to be convened inAugust, 1917. They sent a telegram to the Socialist gathering under the designation, “Korean Socialist Party.”（Related articles found in the Norddeutsche
Allgemeine Zeitung, dated September 2, 1917）. Resistance from the UnitedStates and other Western powers resulted in cancellation of the Socialist
conference in Stockholm, and the Korean telegram came to naught. The
Korean Socialist Party was an organization in name only, but its existenceindicates that Sin and the other leaders of the Mutual Assistance Society had
expanded their consciousness of unity to include the international Socialist
organization.
On November 18, 1917, after the Russian Revolution, the Soviet government issued a “proclamation on peace,” which stated opposition to the forcible annexation of territories and peoples, including colonies. It also stipulated overall recognition of the self-determination of all peoples. It is easy to
imagine that there was a strong desire among the Korean freedom fighters tocooperate with the Soviet regime. At the same time, US President Woodrow
Wilson（1856-1924）announced on January 8, 1918 his Fourteen Points. The

32

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

fifth of the Fourteen Points extolled “a free, open-minded, and absolutely
impartial adjustment of all colonial claims” as well as self-determination ofpeoples. This partial recognition of self-determination also probably increased
the expectations of the Korean independence fighters.
The Sinhan Chŏngnyon Dang 新韓青年党（New Korean Youth Party）was
formed in Shanghai on November 28, 1918 in this global milieu. The leadersof this organization were Yǒ Un-hyong 呂運亨（1886-1947）, and others who
were youthful members of what could be called the second generation of the
Mutual Assistance Society. The leaders of the Mutual Assistance Society
supported this younger generation and participated in the activities of the New
Korean Youth Party. For example, Kim Gyu-sik was appointed chairman of
the Party, while Pak Un-sik became chief editor of the party bulletin, SinhanChǒngnyon 新韓青年, which continued to rally freedom fighters inside andoutside the country to unify the independence movement.
Wilson, who was the US representative at the Paris Peace Conference
held in January, 1919, advocated his Fourteen Points as the centerpiece of theAmerican position. The New Korean Youth Party selected Kim Gyu-sik as
special envoy to the conference, and submitted a petition demanding selfdetermination and independence for Korea. The petition was rejected,
however, and the hopes that Koreans had placed on the conference evaporated. During this period, the events of the March 1 Movement began
unfolding, and independence fighters inside and outside of Korea began
establishing various provisional governments. Incorporating and integratingthese trends, leaders of the Mutual Assistance Society and the New Korean
Youth Party were instrumental in organizing a provisional parliament that
became the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea（Daehanminguk Imsijŏngbu 大韓民国臨時政府）.

Conclusion
The content of the Provisional Constitution of the Republic of China,
comprising seven chapters and 56 articles, was appropriate for the first democratic republic founded in East Asia. The General Provisions of Article 2 ofChapter 1 stipulated the principle of sovereignty for the people: “The sovereignty of the Republic of China shall reside in the whole body of citizens.” In
Article 5, Chapter 2, the principle of impartial equality for the people of thecountry, various rights to freedoms and basic human rights, and duties of thepeople were delineated: “All citizens of the Republic of China, irrespective ofrace, ethnic origin, class, or religion, shall be equal before the law.” Theprovisional constitution adopted the system of three branches of government,
becoming a democratic republic incorporating a parliamentary system under apresident.

The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism 33

Nearly eight years after the Provisional Constitution of the Republic ofChina was promulgated on March 11, 1912—that is, on April 11, 1919—theProvisional Government of the Republic of Korea was established, and theProvisional Constitution of the Republic of Korea was enacted. Article 1 of
the Provisional Constitution states: “The Republic of Korea shall be a democratic republic.” Article 2 advocates a parliamentary system: “The Republic ofKorea shall rule through resolutions of the provisional parliament of theprovisional government.” The informal constitution was comprised of ten
articles on the equality, freedoms, and duties of the people. The constitutionof the Provisional Government of the Republic of Korea enacted on
September 11, 1919 reflected a revision of this informal constitution, andconsisted of a preamble, eight chapters, and 58 articles.
There are many clauses in common between the provisional constitutionsof the Republic of China and Republic of Korea. For example, the General
Provisions of Chapter 1, Article 2 of the Korean Provisional Constitution
state: “the sovereignty of the Republic of Korea shall reside in the people”;
Article 4 states: “All citizens of the Republic of Korea shall be equal before
the law.” Chapter 2, “Rights and Duties of Citizens,” details each freedom
and fundamental human right, as well as duties of the people. The contents
are nearly identical with those of the Provisional Constitution of the Republicof China. The form of government described in the Provisional Constitutionof the Republic of Korea is the same as that of the Republic of China in thatit adopts a system of three branches of government, and is a democratic
republic consisting of a parliamentary system under a president.
Thus, China and Korea, in their respective constitutions, adopted democratic republican forms of government and attempted to traverse paths toward
becoming “democratic republics.”16 What exactly was the philosophicalunderpinning of the democratic republics that each nation chose? I would liketo draw attention to the fact that neither democratic republic was simply an
importation from the West. Chinese and Korean traditions, especially the
traditional Confucian philosophical foundation, are reflected in them. These
include the philosophical concepts of Mencius’s minben 民本（the people are
the foundation of the state）, Tianxia weigong 天下為公（The world is for all）,
16 The paths of China and Korea to democratic republicanism, however, were fullof travail. For example, in the case of China, there was discord between the
Beiyang Government and the Nanjing Provisional Government, which createddomestic factionalism（warlordism）; conflict between the left and the rightthat surfaced after the May 4 Movement; the First United Front and its disintegration; repercussions from the civil war; the Sino-Japanese War and otherhistorical adversities that unfolded in succession. Korea also traveled a long,arduous path.

34

Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia Vol.3 2012

and Tianxia gonggong 天下公共 （Everything in the world shared by all）.
These notions gave rise before the modern era to the concepts of intrinsic
democracy, people’s sovereignty, joint governance between the emperor andthe people, republics, etc.17 It is thought that these ideas were used as a baseupon which modern democracy and republicanism were adopted. In thatsense, the Chinese and Korean democratic republics are a product of hybridization of tradition and modernization. In other words, they are a synthetic
form produced through the acculturation of tradition and modernization.
In contrast, Kita Ikki 北一輝（1883-1937）theorized that “Confucianism
and the republican governmental system are absolutely incompatible.” Hestates: “There is a forcible conflation of the abdication of the legendary
Chinese emperors Yao 堯（2354-2255 BC）and Shun 舜（23rd to 22nd centuryBC）and popular will,” and “never look for theories of sovereignty of thepeople in changes of dynasty.”18 Kita’s theory is a misunderstanding ofConfucianism. Confucianism can be compatible with republicanism, and theabdication of Yao and Shun can indeed be seen as a change in dynasty
through the will of the people. Further, Mencius’s theory that tyrannicide isequivalent to revolutionary change in dynasty can be linked with theories onsovereignty of the people. What should be investigated now is, rather, theproblems and limitations of traditional Japanese Confucianism, and thenonexistence of, or defects in, democratic republicanism in early modern
Japan.

17 In my personal opinion, minben is the concept underlying democracy. Minben
itself connotes human rights and the concept of civil rights, but when it ismerged with the notion of Tianli ziran 天理自然 （natural law） of theCheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianist School 程朱学, for example, it definitely formulates the concepts of human rights and civil rights. Further, Tianxia weigong,
seen in the Li Yun 礼運（The Conveyance of Rites）in the Classic of Rites 礼記,
and Tianxia gonggong that is often used after the advent of the Cheng-Zhu
Neo-Confucianist School, are concepts inherent in the ideas of joint rule by anemperor and the people and in republicanism.
18 Kita Ikki, Zōho, Shina kakumei gaishi 支那革命外史（Unofficial History of theChinese Revolution）,（Tokyo: Kyōdō Printing Co., 共同印刷株式会社 1921）,
p.339.