JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Validation and Verification
CONTENTS
1.

Objectives.............................................................................................................................. 3

2.

Scope and applicability ......................................................................................................... 3

3.

Normative references ............................................................................................................ 3

4.

Terms and definitions ............................................................................................................ 3

5.

General validation and verification procedures..................................................................... 4
5.1.

6.

Sampling ........................................................................................................................ 5

Validation requirements......................................................................................................... 5
6.1.

General requirements ..................................................................................................... 5

6.1.1.

Validation approach ................................................................................................ 5

6.1.2.

Means of validation ................................................................................................ 5

6.2.

Project design document form ....................................................................................... 6

6.3.

Project description ......................................................................................................... 7

6.4.

Application of approved methodology(ies) ................................................................... 7

6.5.

Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions ............................................. 8

6.6.

Environmental impact assessment ................................................................................. 9

6.7.

Local stakeholder consultation....................................................................................... 9

6.8.

Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 10

6.9.

Public inputs................................................................................................................. 106.10. Modalities of communications ..................................................................................... 11
6.11. Avoidance of double registration ................................................................................. 126.12. Start of operation.......................................................................................................... 12
7.

Validation report .................................................................................................................. 13

8.

Verification requirements .................................................................................................... 13
8.1.

General requirements ................................................................................................... 13

8.1.1.

Verification approach ........................................................................................... 13

8.1.2.

Means of verification............................................................................................ 15

8.1.3.

Level of assurance ................................................................................................ 16

8.1.4.

Materiality ............................................................................................................ 16

8.2.

Verification of compliance ........................................................................................... 16

8.2.1.

Compliance of the project implementation with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology ............................................................................................ 16

8.2.2.

Assessment of the project implementation against the registered PDD or any
approved revised PDD ......................................................................................... 161

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

8.2.3.

Compliance of calibration frequency and correction of measured values withrelated requirements ............................................................................................. 17

8.2.4.

Assessment of data and calculation of GHG emission reductions ....................... 18

8.2.5.

Assessment of avoidance of double registration .................................................. 19

8.3.
9.

Post registration changes .............................................................................................. 19

Verification report ............................................................................................................... 20

2

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

1. Objectives
1.

The objectives of the “Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Validation andVerification” (hereinafter referred to as these Guidelines) are to:(a) Enhance consistency and clarity of minimum requirements for all types of Joint
Crediting Mechanism (hereinafter referred to as “JCM”) validation and verification
activities;(b) Enhance the quality and consistency in the preparation, execution, and thereporting of JCM validation and verification activities.

2. Scope and applicability
2.

These Guidelines are applicable to third-party entities (hereinafter referred to as the“TPEs”) that are under contractual arrangement with project participants to validate orverify any JCM projects based on JCM methodologies previously approved by Joint
Committee.

3.

These Guidelines describe standards which are requirements to be met, except guidanceindicated with terms “should” and “may” as defined in paragraph 10 below.

3. Normative references
4.

The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of these
Guidelines:(a) “ISO 14064-3:2006 Greenhouse gases -- Part 3: Specification with guidance for thevalidation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions” (hereinafter referred to as
the “ISO 14064-3”);(b) “Joint Crediting Mechanism Project Cycle Procedure” (hereinafter referred to as
the “Project Cycle Procedure”);(c) “Joint Crediting Mechanism Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document
and Monitoring Report” (hereinafter referred to as the “PDD and Monitoring
Guidelines”).

4. Terms and definitions
5.

Validation is the process of independent evaluation of a proposed JCM project by a TPE
against these Guidelines.

6.

Verification is the periodic independent review and ex post determination by a TPE of themonitored GHG emissions reductions as a result of a registered JCM project during theverification period.

7.

A Corrective Action Request (CAR) is a request raised by the TPE to project participants
during validation or verification in cases such as when there has been a mistake, the3

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

validation or verification requirements not been met or there is a risk that the emission
reductions cannot be monitored or calculated.
8.

A Clarification Request (CL) is a request raised by the TPE to project participants during
validation or verification when the information provided is insufficient or unclear.

9.

A Forward Action Request (FAR) is a request raised by the TPE to project participants
during validation to identify issues that require review during the first verification of the
project, or during verification if monitoring and reporting require attention and/or
adjustment for the next verification.

10. The following terms apply in these Guidelines:(a) “Should” is used to indicate that among several possibilities, one course of action isrecommended as particularly suitable;(b) “May” is used to indicate what is permitted.
11. Terms in these Guidelines are defined in “JCM Glossary of Terms” available on the JCM
website.

5. General validation and verification procedures
12. Validation and/or verification commence(s) when the TPE enters into contract forvalidation and/or verification with the project participant.
13. Validation and verification of the project may be conducted by the same TPE.
14. Validation and verification may be conducted either simultaneously or separately.
15. The TPE selects a competent team to perform the validation and verification of the project.
16. In carrying out its validation and verification work, the TPE:(a) Follows these Guidelines and integrates its provisions into the TPE’s own quality
management systems;(b) Applies the most recent decisions by the Joint Committee;(c) Assesses the accuracy, conservativeness, relevance, completeness, consistency, andtransparency of the information provided by project participants;(d) Determines whether information provided by the project participants is reliable andcredible;1(e) Applies consistent validation and verification criteria:(i)

To the requirements of the applicable approved methodology;(ii)

Among projects with similar characteristics such as a similar application of
the approved methodology, use of technology, time period or region;(iii)

To expert judgments, over time and among projects.

1

Information is credible if it is authentic and is able to inspire belief or trust, and thewillingness of persons to accept the quality of evidence. Information is reliable if the quality ofevidence is accurate and credible and able to yield the same results on a repeated basis.
4

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0(f)

Bases its findings and conclusions on objective evidence and conducts all
validation and verification activities in line with JCM rules and guidelines;(g) Does not omit evidence that is likely to alter the validation and verification
opinion;(h) Presents information in the validation and verification reports in a factual, neutral
and coherent manner, documents all assumptions, provides references tobackground material, and identifies changes made to documentation;(i)

Safeguards the confidentiality of all information obtained or created during
validation or verification.

5.1. Sampling
17. Where the TPE applies sampling as a part of its validation and verification activities, theTPE samples in line with the “Standard for sampling and surveys for CDM project
activities and programme of activities” for large scale CDM projects.

6. Validation requirements
6.1. General requirements
6.1.1. Validation approach
18. In carrying out its validation activities, the TPE:(a) Determines whether the proposed JCM project complies with the requirements of
the applied methodology(ies), these Guidelines and decisions by the Joint
Committee;(b) Assesses the claims and assumptions made in the project design document(hereinafter referred to as “PDD”) and modalities of communication statement(hereinafter referred to as “MoC”). The evidence used in this assessment is not
limited to that provided by the project participants.

6.1.2. Means of validation
19. The TPE assesses the information provided by the project participants.
20. In assessing information, the TPE applies the means of validation specified throughout
these Guidelines, including but not limited to:(a) Document review;(b) Follow-up actions (e.g. on-site visit and interviews by telephone and/or email) as
deemed necessary;(c) Reference to available information relating to projects or technologies similar tothe proposed JCM project under validation.
21. Where no specific means of validation is specified, the TPE applies appropriate auditing5

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

techniques.
Corrective action requests, clarification requests, and forward action requests
22. During the validation of a project, if the TPE identifies issues that require further
elaboration, research or expansion in order to determine whether the project meets thevalidation requirements, the TPE ensures that these issues are accurately identified,formulated, discussed and concluded in the validation report.
23. The TPE raises a CAR if one of the following situations occur:(a) The project participants have made mistakes in the PDD and the MoC;(b) The applicable validation requirements as defined in these Guidelines have notbeen met;(c) There is a risk that emission reductions cannot be monitored or calculated.
24. The TPE raises a CL if information is insufficient or not clear enough to determine whether
the validation requirements have been met.
25. The TPE raises a FAR during validation to identify issues related to project implementationthat require review during the first and subsequent verifications of the project. The TPE
does not raise a FAR regarding issues which can be concluded before verification.
26. The TPE resolves or “closes out” CARs and CLs only if the project participants modify the
project design, rectify the PDD or provide additional explanations or evidence that satisfy
the TPE’s concerns. If this is not done, the TPE does not provide a positive validation
opinion.
27. The TPE reports on all CARs, CLs and FARs in its validation report. This reporting
explains the issues raised, the responses provided by the project participants, the means ofvalidation of such responses and references to any resulting changes in the PDD or
supporting annexes.

6.2. Project design document form
Validation requirement
28. The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using the latest version of the PDD
forms appropriate to the type of project and drafted in line with the PDD and Monitoring
Guidelines.
Reporting requirements
29. The TPE provides a statement regarding the compliance of the PDD with relevant forms
and guidance.

6

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

6.3. Project description
Validation requirement
30. The TPE determines whether the description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD isaccurate, complete, and provides an understanding of the proposed JCM project.
Means of validation
31. The TPE should conduct an on-site visit as deemed necessary. For proposed JCM projects
for which the TPE does not undertake an on-site inspection, the reasons for this are
justified. The TPE may apply a sampling approach as deemed appropriate.
Reporting requirements
32. The TPE:(a) Describes the process conducted to validate the accuracy and completeness of the
project description;(b) Provides an opinion on the accuracy and completeness of the project description;(c) Provides a justification if it has not conducted an on-site visit.

6.4. Application of approved methodology(ies)
Validation requirement
33. The TPE validates that the project is eligible for applying selected methodology and thatthe applied version is valid at the time of submission of the proposed JCM project forvalidation.
Means of validation
34. The TPE determines whether the methodology is correctly quoted and applied bycomparing it with the actual text of the applicable version of the methodology.
35. If the PDD of a proposed JCM project is based on a previous version of a methodology
whose validity has expired, the TPE requests the project participants to provide a revised
PDD in line with the Project Cycle Procedure.
36. The TPE determines whether the project meets each eligibility criterion of the approved
methodology or any other approved methodology component if referred to therein. This isdone by checking the documentation referred to in the PDD and by reviewing comparable
information as deemed necessary to confirm that the project meets the eligibility criteria ofthe methodology.
Reporting requirements
37. For each eligibility criterion listed in the approved methodology applied, the TPE describes7

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

the steps taken to assess the relevant information contained in the PDD against thesecriteria.

6.5. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions
Validation requirement
38. The TPE determines whether all relevant GHG emission sources covered in themethodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating project emissions and reference
emissions for the proposed JCM project.
39. The TPE determines whether the values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if applicable.
Means of validation
40. The TPE confirms the emission sources and GHGs based on documented evidence andcorroborates it by a site visit where required.
41. If the methodology allows project participants to choose whether a source or gas is to be
included, the TPE determines whether the project participants have justified that choice.
The TPE determines whether the justification provided is reasonable, based on anassessment of supporting documented evidence provided by the project participants andcorroborated by observations if required.
42. The TPE ensures that the Monitoring Spreadsheet is not altered, and its required fields areappropriately filled in.
43. If values for project specific parameters are fixed ex ante, the TPE determines whether alldata sources and assumptions are appropriate and calculations are correct as applicable tothe proposed JCM project.
Reporting requirements
44. The TPE describes how the validation of emission sources and GHG types has been
performed, by detailing the documentation assessed and by describing its observations.
45. The TPE states whether the selected emission sources and GHG types are justified for theJCM project. Should the TPE identify emission sources that will be affected by the
implementation of the proposed JCM project and which are significantly and reasonably
attributable to the project and are not addressed by the applied approved methodology, theTPE informs the Joint Committee and the project participants of such findings byelectronic means.
46. The TPE describes the steps taken to assess values for project specific parameters to be
fixed ex ante in the Monitoring Plan Sheet and intermediate processes to derive the values.
The TPE provides an opinion as to whether those are considered reasonable in the context
8

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

of the proposed JCM project.

6.6. Environmental impact assessment
Validation requirement
47. The TPE determines whether the project participants conducted an environmental impact
assessment, if required by the Republic of Costa Rica, in line with the Costa Rican
procedures.
Means of validation
48. The TPE assesses the above requirements by means of a document review and/or using
local official sources and expertise.
Reporting requirements
49. The TPE indicates whether the project participants have conducted an environmental
impact assessment in line with procedures as required by the Republic of Costa Rica.

6.7. Local stakeholder consultation
Validation requirement
50. The TPE determines whether the project participants have completed a local stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage stakeholders and solicit
comments for the proposed project.
Means of validation
51. The TPE determines, by means of document review and interviews with local stakeholders
as appropriate, whether:(a) Comments have been invited from local stakeholders that are relevant for the
proposed project;(b) The summary of the comments received as provided in the PDD is complete;(c) The project participants have taken due account of all comments received and havedescribed this process in the PDD.
Reporting requirements
52. The TPE:(a) Describes the steps taken to assess the adequacy of the local stakeholder
consultation;(b) Provides an opinion on the adequacy of the local stakeholder consultation.

9

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

6.8. Monitoring
Validation requirement
53. The TPE determines whether the description of the monitoring plan (Monitoring Plan Sheetand Monitoring Structure Sheet) is based on the approved methodology and/or PDD andMonitoring Guidelines.
54. The TPE determines whether the monitoring points for measurement are appropriate, as
well as whether the types of equipment to be installed are appropriate if necessary.
Means of validation
55. The TPE applies a two-step process to meet the above requirements:(a) To assess compliance of the monitoring plan with the approved methodology
and/or PDD and Monitoring Guidelines, the TPE:(i)

Identifies the list of parameters required by the applied methodology bymeans of document review;(ii)

Confirms that they are described and that the means of monitoring describedin the plan complies with the requirements of the methodology.

(b) To assess the implementation of the plan the TPE assesses whether:(i)

The monitoring structure described in the Monitoring Structure Sheet of themonitoring plan are feasible within the project design;(ii)

The means of implementation of the monitoring plan, including the data
management and quality assurance and quality control procedures, aresufficient for ex post reporting and verification.

Reporting requirements
56. The TPE:(a) States its opinion on the compliance of the described monitoring plan with therequirements of the methodology and/or PDD and Monitoring Guidelines;(b) States its opinion on the project participants’ ability to implement the describedmonitoring plan including feasibility of monitoring structure.

6.9. Public inputs
Validation requirement
57. The TPE ensures that all inputs on the PDD of the proposed JCM project submitted in linewith the Project Cycle Procedure are taken into due account by the project participants..
Means of validation10

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

58. The TPE reviews all inputs on the PDD of the proposed JCM project submitted in line with
the Project Cycle Procedure.
59. The TPE interviews with the project participants as necessary to determine whether the
project participants have taken due account of the public inputs.
Reporting requirement
60. The TPE reports the details of the actions taken to take due account of the inputs received
during the public inputs.

6.10. Modalities of communications
Validation requirement
61. The TPE validates the corporate identity of all project participants and a focal point
included in the MoC, as well as the personal identities, including specimen signatures andemployment status, of their authorized signatories.
62. The TPE validates that the MoC has been correctly completed and duly authorized.
Means of validation
63. The TPE validates the requirements delineated in paragraph 61 above through:(a) Directly checking evidence for corporate, personal identity and other relevant
documentation;(b) Notarized documentation; or(c) Written confirmation from the project participant that submits to it the MoC that all
corporate and personal details, including specimen signatures, are valid andaccurate.
64. When the TPE validates identity by applying paragraph 63(c) above, the TPE ensures that
the MoC is received from a project participant with whom the TPE has a contractual
relationship.
65. When the TPE validates identity by applying paragraph 63(c) above, the TPE ensures thatthe official who submits the MoC to the TPE and the official who signed the written
confirmation (if a different person) is/are duly authorized to do so on behalf of therespective project participant.
66. If the TPE is unable to validate the requirements by applying paragraph 63 (a), (b) or (c)above then the TPE may perform further validation activities in order to confirm that thecorporate and personal details, employment status and specimen signatures included in the
MoC are valid and accurate and comply with the requirements of this section.
67. The TPE checks that:(a) The latest version of the form for the MoC has been used;11

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0(b) The information required as per the form for the MoC is correctly completed.
Reporting requirements
68. The TPE describes how it has performed due diligence on the MoC in line with therequirements established in these Guidelines.
69. The TPE describes how the MoC complies with all relevant forms and requirements.

6.11. Avoidance of double registration
Validation requirement
70. The TPE determines whether the proposed JCM project is not registered under otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.
Means of validation
71. The TPE receives a written confirmation in the MoC from the project participants that the
proposed JCM project is not registered under other international climate mitigation
mechanisms.
72. In addition to the above, the TPE conducts, at a minimum, a search on the websites of
CDM and JI to check whether the projects with similar technology and location have beenregistered. When projects with similar technology and location are found, the TPE ensures,
through document review and/or interviews with the project participants on whether the
proposed JCM project differs from projects registered under other international climate
mitigation mechanisms.
Reporting requirements
73. The TPE provides an opinion on whether the proposed JCM project is not registered underother international climate mitigation mechanisms.

6.12. Start of operation
Validation requirement
74. The TPE determines whether the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM project
does not predate January 1, 2013.
Means of validation
75. The TPE conducts a review of documents and records of operation and performance asappropriate. The TPE should conduct an on-site visit as deemed necessary.
Reporting requirements
12

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

76. The TPE provides an opinion on the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM
project.

7. Validation report
77. The TPE reports the results of its assessment in a validation report.
78. The TPE states in the validation report either of the following final validation opinion:(a) A positive validation opinion with a date of submission; or(b) A negative validation opinion explaining the reason for its opinion if the TPE
determines that the proposed JCM project does not fulfill the applicable JCM
requirements or the information provided by the project participants is insufficient.
79. The validation report gives an overview of the validation conclusions and the validation
process used by the TPE. All validation findings are identified and justified.
80. In its validation report, the TPE provides the following:(a) A summary of the validation process and its conclusions;(b) All its applied approaches, findings and conclusions;(c) Information on public inputs carried out by the Joint Committee, including dates
and how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants;(d) Responses of the project participants to CARs and CLs, and discussions on andrevisions to project documentation;(e) A list of interviewees and documents reviewed;(f)

Details of the validation team, technical experts, internal technical reviewers
involved, together with their roles in the validation activity and details of who
conducted the on-site visit;(g) Information on quality control within the team and in the validation process;(h) Appointment certificates or curricula vitae of the TPE’s validation team members,
technical experts and internal technical reviewers for the project.
81. The TPE provides the project participants with the report along with the supporting
documents, and informs the Joint Committee of the outcome.

8. Verification requirements
8.1. General requirements
8.1.1. Verification approach
82. In carrying out its verification activities, a TPE determines whether the project complies
with the requirements of the applied methodology(ies), these Guidelines, and decisions by
the Joint Committee.
83. Main focus of verification activities are given to the assessment of the following aspects:(a) The eligibility criteria which are stipulated in the applied methodology of13

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

implemented projects are satisfied;(b) The data used in monitoring reports is credible and reliable;(c) Double registration is avoided;(d) There are no post registration changes which prevent the use of the applied
methodology.
84. The assessment described in paragraph 83 above involves a review of relevant
documentation as well as an on-site visit(s) at least for the first verification.
85. In addition to the documentation concerning monitoring activity the TPE reviews:(a) The registered PDD, including any approved changes from the registered PDD andthe corresponding validation opinion;(b) The validated PDD in case validation and verification are conductedsimultaneously and the corresponding validation opinion;(c) The validation report;(d) Previous verification reports, if any;(e) The applied methodology;(f)

The monitoring report to verify that it is as per the corresponding Monitoring
Report Sheet to the applied methodology;(g) Any other information and references relevant to the project’s emission reductions(e.g. IPCC reports, data on laboratory analysis and national regulations);(h) The written confirmation of the avoidance of double registration.
86. In addition to reviewing the monitoring documentation, the TPE determines whether the
project participants have addressed the FARs identified during validation or previous
verification(s).
Quality of evidence
87. When verifying the reported emission reductions, the TPE confirms that there is an audit
trail that contains the evidence and records that validate or invalidate the stated values in
the Monitoring Report Sheet. It includes the source documents that form the basis forcalculations and other information underlying the emission reductions.
88. When assessing the audit trail, the TPE:(a) Addresses whether there is sufficient evidence available, both in terms offrequency (time period between evidence) and coverage (in covering the fullmonitoring period);(b) Addresses the source and nature of the evidence (external or internal, oral or
documented).
89. The TPE only verifies emission reductions that are based on verifiable evidence.

14

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

8.1.2. Means of verification
90. The TPE assesses the information provided by the project participants.
91. In assessing information, the TPE applies the means of verification specified throughout
these Guidelines, including but not limited to:(a) Document review; and(b) On-site assessment.
92. Where no specific means of verification is specified, the TPE applies appropriate auditing
techniques.
Corrective action requests, clarification requests, and forward action requests
93. The TPE identifies, discusses and concludes in the verification report issues related to themonitoring, implementation and operations of the registered/validated project that could
impair the capacity of the registered/validated project to achieve emission reductions or
influence the monitoring and reporting of emission reductions.
94. The TPE raises a CAR if one of the following situations occur:(a) Non-compliance with the eligibility criteria of the applied methodology is found in
implementation and operation of the project, or if the evidence provided to prove
conformity is insufficient;(b) Modifications, which prevent the use of the applied methodology, to theimplementation, operation and monitoring of the registered/validated project has
not been sufficiently documented by the project participants;(c) Mistakes have been made in applying assumptions, data or calculations of emission
reductions that will impact the quantity of emission reductions; or(d) Issues identified in a FAR during validation or previous verification(s) to beverified have not been resolved by the project participants.
95. The TPE raises a CL if information is insufficient or not clear enough to determine whether
the applicable requirements of the applied methodology and the PDD have been met.
96. All CARs and CLs raised by the TPE during verification are resolved prior to submitting arequest for issuance of credits.
97. The TPE raises a FAR during verification for actions if the monitoring and reporting
require attention and/or adjustment for the next verification period.
98. The TPE reports on all CARs, CLs and FARs in its verification report. This reporting is
conducted in a transparent manner that allows the reader to understand the issue raised, theresponses provided by the project participants, the means of verification of such responses
and references to any resulting changes in the monitoring report or supporting annexes.

15

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

8.1.3. Level of assurance
99. The TPE applies the reasonable assurance level for verification in line with ISO
14064-3:2006.

8.1.4. Materiality
100. The TPE uses the concept of materiality for verification in line with ISO 14064-3:2006.
101. The threshold of materiality for verification is set at five (5) percent of emission reductions.

8.2. Verification of compliance8.2.1. Compliance of the project implementation with the eligibility criteria of theapplied methodology
Verification requirement
102. The TPE determines the conformity of the actual project and its operation with theeligibility criteria of the applied methodology.
Means of verification
103. The TPE assesses, by means of an on-site visit, that physical features of the project are inplace and that the project participants have operated the project as per the eligibility criteriaof the applied methodology. If an on-site visit is not conducted after the first verification,
the TPE justifies the rationale of the decision.
Reporting requirements
104. For each monitoring period, the TPE reports the compliance with the eligibility criteria of
the applied methodology.

8.2.2. Assessment of the project implementation against the registered PDD or any
approved revised PDD
Verification requirement
105. The TPE assesses the status of the actual project and its operation with theregistered/validated PDD or any approved revised PDD.
Means of verification
106. The TPE assesses, by means of an on-site visit at least for the first verification, thatphysical features of the project in the registered/validated PDD are in place and that the
project participants have operated the project as per the registered/validated PDD or any
approved revised PDD.

16

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

Reporting requirements
107. For each monitoring period, the TPE reports changes from the registered or validated PDD
or any approved revised PDD.

8.2.3. Compliance of calibration frequency and correction of measured values
with related requirements
Verification requirement
108. If monitoring of parameters related to the GHG emissions reductions of a project has been
conducted by measuring equipments (monitoring Option C defined in the PDD andMonitoring Guidelines), the TPE determines whether the measuring equipments have been
properly calibrated in line with the monitoring plan and whether measured values areproperly corrected, where necessary, to calculate emission reductions in line with the PDD
and Monitoring Guidelines.
Means of verification
109. If monitoring of parameters related to the GHG emissions reductions of the project has
been conducted by measuring equipments (monitoring Option C defined in the PDD andMonitoring Guidelines), the TPE determines whether the measuring equipments have been
properly calibrated in line with the monitoring plan.
110. If the measuring equipments are:(a) Properly calibrated in line with the monitoring plan, the TPE determines whether
the measured values are properly corrected, where necessary, to calculate emission
reductions in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines;(b) Not properly calibrated in line with the monitoring plan, the TPE determines
whether the result of a delayed calibration is allowed to be used to calculate
emission reductions in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines. If the resultof a delayed calibration is:(i)Allowed to be used, the TPE determines whether the measured values areproperly corrected, where necessary, based on the result of the delayedcalibration in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines;(ii)

Not allowed to be used, the measured values are not used for that monitoring
period.

111. Where using the result of a delayed calibration is allowed as described in paragraph110(b)(i), if the results of the delayed calibration are not available or the calibration has notbeen conducted at the time of verification, the TPE requests, prior to finalizing verification,
the project participants to conduct the required calibration.
112. In cases where the TPE determines that it is not possible for the project participants to17

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

conduct the calibration at a frequency specified by either the applied methodology and/or
the registered monitoring plan due to reasons beyond the control of project participants, theTPE seeks guidance from the Joint Committee.
Reporting requirements
113. The TPE lists each parameter which has been monitored by measuring equipment andstates whether the calibration of the measuring equipment is properly conducted in linewith the monitoring plan and whether the measured values are appropriately corrected, if
necessary, in line with the PDD and Monitoring Guidelines.

8.2.4. Assessment of data and calculation of GHG emission reductions
Verification requirement
114. The TPE assesses the data and calculations of GHG emission reductions achieved
by/resulting from the project by the application of the selected approved methodology.
Means of verification
115. The TPE determines whether:(a) The corresponding Monitoring Report Sheet of the applied methodology has beenused;(b) A complete set of data for the specified monitoring period is available. If partial
data are unavailable, the TPE either gives negative verification opinion for thattime period during which the data are unavailable in the monitoring period or seeks
guidance from the Joint Committee;(c) Information provided in the monitoring report has been checked with sources suchas plant logbooks, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analysis;(d) Any assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified;(e) Appropriate emission factors, default values, and other reference values have beencorrectly applied.
Reporting requirement
116. The verification report contains:(a) A confirmation that appropriate Monitoring Report Sheet of the applied
methodology has been used;(b) A confirmation that a set of data for the specified monitoring period was complete,or a list of actions taken by the TPE in line with the guidance from the Joint
Committee when partial data are unavailable;(c) A description of how the TPE checked reported data;18

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0(d) An opinion as to whether assumptions, emission factors, default values, and otherreference values that were applied in the calculations have been justified.

8.2.5. Assessment of avoidance of double registration
Verification requirement
117. The TPE determines whether the project is not registered under other international climate
mitigation mechanisms.
Means of verification
118. The TPE receives a written confirmation from the project participants that the project is notregistered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms.
119. In addition to paragraph 118 above, the TPE conducts, at a minimum, a search on thewebsite of the CDM and JI to check whether the projects with similar technology andlocation in the Republic of Costa Rica have been registered. When projects with similar
technology and location are found, the TPE ensures, through document review and/orinterviews with the project participants on whether the project differs from projects
registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms.
Reporting requirement
120. The TPE provides an opinion on whether the project is not registered under otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.

8.3. Post registration changes
Verification requirement
121. The TPE determines whether there are post registration changes from the registered PDD
and/or methodology which prevent the use of the applied methodology.
Means of verification
122. If the TPE identifies that the project has been changed from the registered PDD and/or
methodology and that change would prevent the use of the applied methodology, the TPE
raises a CAR and requests the project participants to seek prior approval from the Joint
Committee with respect to the acceptability of the changes.
123. The TPE continues verification following guidance from the Joint Committee.
Reporting requirements
124. Where the change which prevents the use of the applied methodology is identified during
verification and the Joint Committee approves the change, the TPE indicates in the19

JCM_CR_GL_VV_ver01.0

verification report the types of change, and how the CAR raised is addressed.
125. Where the change which does not prevent the use of the applied methodology is identified
during verification, the TPE describes the types of change in the verification report.

9. Verification report126. The verification report gives an overview of the verification conclusions and theverification process used by the TPE. All verification findings are identified and justified.
127. The TPE reports the following:(a) A summary of the verification process and the scope of verification;(b) A summary of the verification results and decision on the level of assurance;(c) Details of the verification team, technical experts, and internal reviewers involved,
together with their roles in the verification activity and details of who conducted
the on-site visit;(d) Findings of the desk review and site visit;(e) All of the TPE’s findings and conclusions as to whether:(i)

The project has been implemented and operated in line with the eligibility
criteria of the applied methodology;(ii)

Omissions or misstatements of reported values are considered as immaterial;(iii)

The measuring equipments have been calibrated in line with the monitoringplan and the measured values are corrected appropriately in line with the
PDD and Monitoring Guidelines, for parameters monitored under Option C;(iv)

The data and calculation of GHG emission reductions have been assessed tocorrectly support the emission reductions being claimed;(v)

The project is not registered under other international climate mitigation
mechanisms.

(f)

A list of each parameter specified by the monitoring plan and a statement on how
the values in the monitoring report have been verified;(g) A statement that identifies any changes to the registered PDD, and their date of
approval by the Joint Committee;(h) An assessment and close-out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued to the project
participants;(i)

An assessment of remaining issues from the previous verification period, if
appropriate;(j)

A conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved.

128. The TPE describes all documentation supporting verification and makes such
documentation available to the Joint Committee upon request.

20