1Moratorium on 5G roll-out and legal request of documents
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Cabinet of Commissioner Vytenis Andriukai=s
Head of Cabinet
Dear Mr. Arūnas VINČIŪNAS cc: Commissioner Vytenis Andriuka=s
Thank you for your leIer of Sept. 5, 2019, which is deeply concerning and unsa=sfactory (yourreference: Ref. Ares(2019)5589894 - 05/09/2019). Amongst various aspects, you do not answer
properly to our ques=on n. 3, which was speciﬁc:Your response on the point is as follows:

Such a response does not fulﬁl the request, as it is a mere renuncia=on at one (1) document whichis by the way, 4 years old and does not touch at all on the speciﬁc technical maIers and muchhigher frequencies of 5G. Whereas, our request was speciﬁc: to be given access to all documents
related to EMF’s and health in your possession. Is that really the only one you have? You do notseem to know that the SCENIHR document you men=on is well proven to be fraudulent1.
Speciﬁcally now, as we wish to assist the Commissioner in giving due response, it can be further
speciﬁed from this side that we need the list of documents related to EMFs created by RF/Radiofrequencies (so: not by ELF) and even more speciﬁcally, to the list of those documents basedon which the Commission is basing its current posi6on that 5G should not be stopped nor subject to
1 https://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pall_2018.pdf (see chapter 5)

2a moratorium (see the statement of your leIer that “ﬁrst there is a need to see how this newtechnology will be applied and how the scien6ﬁc evidence will evolve”). We leave aside our total
disagreement on the merits of such posi=on at this =me: formally, we are en=tled to receive fromyou such a list of documents based on which the Commissioner determined that 5G is safe. Basedon that list we will decide which of those documents, are of interest. Please provide such list byemail no later than October 31, 2019. This is urgent!
In addi=on, given that you give enormous deference to a paper to be issued by a private en=ty
named “ICNIRP” (your statement on such point is “the Commission will review the situa6on once
the review of the guidelines issued by the Interna6onal Commission on Non-Ionizing Protec6on(ICNIRP) will be ﬁnalised”) we formulate a speciﬁc ques=on which is the following: Have youveriﬁed that members, or people linked or giving advice/consulta=on to ICNIRP, have no conﬂict ofinterest in rela=on to the subject maIer? Have you veriﬁed the same in rela;on to previous
posi;ons held by same en;ty? If you have made such veriﬁca=on(s), then please provide relevant
minutes and related decisions (this is a request under art. 42, again, EU Fundamental Rights). Have
you seen the RebuIal by professor emeritus Mar=n Pall, sent to ICNIRP, and showing that theICNIRP document to be used as a base for new guidelines is full of fraudulent statements that”there is no research showing harmful eﬀects”. If you have not seen it please see note 2 .
We expect that EU must obey the rules which EU has conﬁrmed, i.e. the Precau=onary Principle3.
which: "enables a rapid response to be given in the face of a possible danger to human, animal orplant health, or to protect the environment. In particular, where scientific data do not permit acomplete evaluation of the risk, recourse to this principle may, for example, be used to stop
distribution or order withdrawal from the market of products likely to be hazardous.”
Therefore, we are very surprised by your statement that you want to wait to see ”how the scien6ﬁc
evidence will evolve”. However, you cannot wait and see when the Precau=onary Principle says
exactly the opposite: ”enables a rapid response to be given in the face of a POSSIBLE danger…”
In our earlier leIer we also insisted that commissioner Andriukai=s himself should take theresponsibility for the reply to us and also sign the reply. That was not done. We now again insist
that commissioner Andriuka=s signs the reply. However, most of all we expect that he at once
declares ”health emergency” (like Oregon State in the USA4) and that he immediately implementsa moratorium on the 5G deployment to allow further research on poten=al health risks, see www.
5gappeal.eu endorsed by more than 250 scien=sts and medical doctors. This must be done before
5G is deployed since 5G will tremendously increase the radia=on. Please, see the list of more than
100 ci=es, municipali=es and regions, which have already declared a moratorium to allow research
before rolling out 5G4.
Vasa, Finland and Örebro, Sweden, 24 October, 2019

Rainer Nyberg
Professor emeritus, EdD
NRNyberg@abo.ﬁ

Lennart Hardell

Oncologist, MD, PhD
lennart.hardell@environmentandcancer.com

2 http://www.5gappeal.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/icnirp_2018_pall.pdf
3 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l32042&from=EN
4 https://www.dropbox.com/s/c5qrunswuqigphy/euattachment1.pdf?dl=0