Stockholm Resilience Centre

Annual report 2014a partner with

2

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Stockholm Resilience Centre Annual Report 2014
printed by TMG Tabergs AB, 2015edited by Marika Haeggman
frontpage by Marika Haeggman and Ingo Fetzer
graphic design by Matador kommunikation
address Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
visiting address Kräftriket 2b
telephone +46 8 674 70 60
info@stockholmresilience.su.se
www.stockholmresilience.su.seSTOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Stockholm Resilience Centre Annual Report 2014
Chair’s preface_______________________________________________ 4
Directors’ view_______________________________________________ 5
A “hybrid board” for the future________________________________ 6
Biosphere-based ­Sustainability Science________________________ 8
Publications__________________________________________________ 9
Research highlights__________________________________________ 10
Model Calendar_____________________________________________ 13
Scientific publications_______________________________________ 14
Books_______________________________________________________ 23
Reflections on people and the biosphere______________________ 24
Where in the world are we?__________________________________ 26
Policy, practice and outreach_________________________________ 28
Seminars and events________________________________________ 36
Education___________________________________________________ 50
Appendix___________________________________________________ 54

3

4

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Chair’s preface“It is with great pleasure and excitement that I have taken on the roleas Chair of the Stockholm Resilience Centre’s governing board”, says
Frances Westley
Photo: courtesy of Uni. of Waterloo

Frances Westley,
Chair of the Board

I have had the privilege of following theCentre from its start in 2007, and from the vantage point of an external social scientist who
knows it well, I have watched the Centre’s focus
on ­social-­ecological systems research, biospherestewardship and resilience for sustainable development move from the periphery to the centreof scientific focus, not just in Sweden but aroundthe world. We live in an era of not only rising
global environmental risks, but also intertwined
challenges to humans and nature that increasingly, and often abruptly, affect social and economic development in new ways. Those ways
are often unexpected, such as the fact that thedwindling freshwater supply to the mega citySão Paulo is driven in part by droughts triggered by climate change and deforestation of
the Amazon rainforest. There is also increasing
evidence of contagion, of the propensity for the
impacts of events in one part of the world cascading and connecting across scales and acrossgeography, so that those changes propagate andtrigger changes in other systems. The financial
and food price crises that simultaneously hit theworld in 2008 are examples of this. This new
global era, the Anthropocene as it has beentermed, needs new frameworks and new research methodologies if it is to be understood.
We need to find dynamic ways to connect thebest the disciplines have to offer and to do it
quickly and elegantly. A resilience lens is ofgreat value in capturing the significance of how
periods of incremental change interact with periods of rapid change, delivering insights for science, practice and policy.

Vision & Mission
The vision of the Stockholm Resilience Centre is a world where
social-ecological systems are understood, governed and managed,
to enhance human well-being and the capacity to deal with complexity and change, for the sustainable co-evolution of humancivilizations with the biosphere.

Reality triggers new questions concerning how
communities, nations, businesses and the worldcommunity at large – despite deepening ethnic,
religious and financial cracks in the social fabricof many nations and regions – can collaborate
on building a pathway to sustainable development, for the benefit of mankind. Meeting the
proposed UN Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) to achieve a world where poverty andhunger are alleviated, the big health and educational challenges are resolved and effective governance, equity and transparency are at the heartof all nations’ pursuit of development withinsafe boundaries for a stable and resilient planet
will require nothing less than major transformations. It is rewarding to note that the Stockholm
Resilience Centre places emphasis on advancing
research concerning transformation pathways
towards sustainability, and will be hosting in
October 2015 the 2nd international research
conference on transformations – People and thePlanet in the Anthropocene.
A key feature of the Centre’s ability to advance interdisciplinary sustainability science isthe support it receives from Stockholm University. The University’s support for research, and,in particular, its academic programmes – fromthe Centre’s MSc programme on Social-Ecological Resilience for Sustainable Development to
its new PhD program in Sustainability Science
with a focus on Biosphere Stewardship – is key. We
draw on all four faculties – law, social sciences,humanities, and natural sciences – and this depth
and breadth is a prerequisite for success. I lookforward to continued support for the Centre’s
integrated, ambitious and internationally outstanding research and educational agenda in the
coming years.

The mission of Stockholm Resilience Centre is to advance researchfor governance and management of social-ecological systems tosecure ecosystem services for human well-being and resilience forlong-term sustainability. We apply and further develop the scientificadvancements of this research within practice, policy and academic
training.

5

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Directors’ view
The tag-line of the Stockholm Resilience Centre – Sustainability Sciencefor Biosphere Stewardship – is probably more important than our actual
name. It emerged after carefully re-crafting the research framework for
the Centre
We have set out to be an internationally leading research institution at the frontier of sustainability science. All of oursustainability science is anchored in the fundamental starting
point that human societies are embedded parts of the biosphere and shape it from local to global scales.
It may sound trivial, but a biosphere-based sustainability
science is in fact a very clarifying identity for our inter- andtransdisciplinary research. We live in an increasingly interconnected and global society with interactions ultimately
framed by a resilient biosphere.
From this vantage point we explore the challenges of
steward­ship of the biosphere and ecosystem services for ourown sustainable development. This requires the use of multiple
theories and methods and collaboration with a diversity ofcompetencies from philosophy, behavioural sciences, and­economics, to geography, ecology and Earth system science.
It requires the integration of an understanding of Earth system
dynamics, from local ecosystems to the biosphere as a wholewith an understanding of how human agency, behaviour, incentives, power, and institutions interact with and shape these
dynamics. Fundamental aspects like democracy, health, security, poverty alleviation, equality, human rights, and peace allrest on the life-support capacity and resilience of the biosphere.
At the Centre, we seldom pursue research strictly along
disciplinary lines. Our focus is on understanding the new

Johan Rockström,
Executive director

Carl Folke,
Science director­ ynamics of intertwined and complex social-ecological systems
din the Anthropocene and dealing with questions relevant forsocieties – such as how we can feed humanity within planetary
boundaries. Such a question requires collaborative researchacross disciplines applying different theories and methods,
drawing upon in-depth disciplinary knowledge and interdisciplinary competencies where the collision between know­
ledge systems and evidence from multiple sources becomesthe intellectual mix that triggers new findings. Whether the
research should be disciplinary, or interdisciplinary in its own
right becomes less important compared to finding the rightdepth and mix of approaches that can help address suchquestions.
Surprise, in all facets of life, has increasingly become partof normality in the Anthropocene, where social, economicand environmental dynamics occur at higher speed and magnitude, and across scales, than before. This is why we findthat applying a resilience lens to our research is often useful.
It provides us with a way to analyse and understand what it
takes for social-ecological systems to persist and develop
along current pathways in the face of change or transform
into new pathways, and reconnecting development to thebiosphere. Sustainability Science for Biosphere Stewardshipis the tag-line and the cornerstone of our research.

Olof Olsson,
Deputy director

6

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

A “hybrid board” for the future
When the Centre board was re-structured in 2014, Frances Westley, a longtime scientific and strategic partner, stepped up as Chair. Few could be­better qualified for the job
FRANCES WESTLEY is based at the University of Waterloo
and is one of the most respected researchers on social inno­
vation and strategic change in Canada. With this vast experience and expertise, she considers the role as Chair for theCentre to be extremely exciting.
“Since the Stockholm Resilience Centre was established in
2007, it has become the best known centre for resilience research in the world,” says Westley. “At the same time, theCentre itself has grown from a small organisation to a rather
big one, now employing around 100 people. The transition it
is now facing is an important and exciting one, because it
needs to maintain the unique culture and climate of the small
and innovative organisation, while establishing the structuresneeded to run a large organisation.”
PHOTO: courtesy of Uni. of Waterloo

As the JW McConnell Chair in Social Innovation at the
University of Waterloo, managing this type of transition issomething that Westley has experience with, and she is morethan happy to offer her expertise as Chair of the board. As along-time partner of the Centre, including the role as a board
member, she is also in a good position to assess and support
the Centre’s progress.
“The Stockholm Resilience Centre is sometimes criticized
as too generalist - that it’s a mile wide and an inch deep –which is always the critique of interdisciplinary work. Anyone exposed however to the published research, or given theopportunity to hear presentations from the Centre’s PhD students, can’t help but be impressed by the strong disciplinary
basis undergirding their work,” Westley says. “The researchof both faculty and students is strong, well-­informed and powerfully grounded. At thesame time, it is designed to create openings
and opportunities to connect the ideas withothers from other disciplines.”
She believes this is what sets the Centre
apart from others: the capacity to not simply
gather different disciplines under one roof but
to also make sure they connect.
“What is truly exciting is the process where
you sit down together to talk about your respective findings and about how the findings
add up to a better understanding of the research field as a whole, and the implications ofthat research for ­policy, practice and action”
she says. “Doing this is still more of an art
than a science. It requires a specific way ofworking and communicating and is perpetuated by culture. As the Centre grows, these are
the qualities that are so important to nurturein the face of change, and the board can certainly help in the process.”
She describes the new board as a kind of“hybrid board.” One part consists of international advisors with immense e­ xperience of
the kind of work done at the Centre, including
new areas, such as increased focus on development work. ­Another part represents Stockholm
University, providing e­ xtensive knowledge
about the structures and institutions of theuniversity.

7

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE“I feel honoured to have been asked to bechair of the board at this very importanttime.”Dr Frances Westley, University of Waterloo

Together, they represent a vast range of expertise ande­ xperiences that can help guide the Centre in its continuing
growth.
“The Centre does not rest on its laurels – the researchersand students are continuously taking on new challenges,
while keeping a strong emphasis on synthesis and connection.”says Westley. “In this work, the board has a role in helping tosupport these initiatives and maintaining key links to the university and the broader academic world. We can act as a strategic sounding board for new ideas and directions, and offer
advice about the best structures and systems to support thiswork. We are lucky to have the board that we have, alongside
the continuity of the excellent leadership of the Centre, andestablished and emerging researchers advancing the science. “

The Stockholm Resilience Centre board members:
Chair: Prof. Frances Westley, Waterloo University,­Canada,Prof. Karin Bäckstrand, Department of Political ­Science,
Stockholm University, Sweden
Prof. Stephen R Carpenter, University of Wisconsin-­
Madison, USA
Prof. Deliang Chen, University of Gothenburg , Sweden
Prof. Sara A. O. Cousins, Stockholm University, Sweden
Prof. Qin Dahe, Macao Polytechnic Institute, China
Prof. Gretchen Daily, Stanford University, USA
Prof. Jonas Ebbesson, Stockholm University, Sweden
Prof. Peter Hambäck, Stockholm university, Sweden
Prof. Simon Levin, Princeton University, USA
Prof. Bonnie McCay, Rutgers University, USA
Dr. Leena Srivastava, Vice Chancellor TERI University
and Hony. Executive Director at TERI, India
Pavan Sukhdev, Visiting Fellow at Yale University,
Founder-­CEO of GIST Advisory, Study Leader of TEEBFrom left: Line Gordon, Stephen Carpenter, Pavan Sukhdev, Carl Folke, Jonas Ebbesson, Thomas Nilsson, Frances Westley, Johan Rockström (hidden),Peter Hambäck, Deliang Chen (hidden), Emina Muratspahic (hidden), Olof Olsson at a board meeting at the Centre. Not present at the meeting were
Simon Levin, Karin Bäckstrand, Sara Cousins, Bonnie McCay, Leena Srivastava, Gretchen Daily and Qin Dahe.

8

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Biosphere-based­Sustainability Science
Sustainability Science incorporates diverse research paths seeking ways
to understand and help facilitate transitions toward sustainability. It isa broad multi- and interdisciplinary field defined by the problems it­addresses rather than by the disciplines it employs
Many remaining sustainability
challenges are complex, and addressing
them requires complex research approaches. For us, interdisciplinarity is ameans, not a goal. Our academic trackrecord is proof of the diversity and scopeof the field in which we are operating.
Since 2007, we have been published in
more than 200 different international
peer-reviewed scientific journals, described as either natural science, social
science, or interdisciplinary journals.
The research focus of Stockholm­Resilience Centre is sustainability sciencefor biosphere steward­ship. The researchframework of the Centre emphasizes
that people are embedded parts of thebiosphere and shape it – from local to
global scales, from the past to the future– and that we now are living in the­Anthropocene. The framework
clarifies that all people on Earthare fundamentally d­ ependent
on the collective work of the
Earth’s ecosystems, the biosphere, and that sustainability
is not just social or economic
but that human progress rests
on a resilient biosphere.
The environment is notviewed as a mere input among
many others for human wellbeing but serves as a foundation for social and economic
development. It makes clearthat fundamental issues forhumanity like democracy,
economic development, health,security, poverty alleviation,equality, human rights, andpeace all rest on the resilience of thebiosphere. It makes clear that environmental issues are about our own future
on Earth. It makes clear the challenges
and opportunities that emerge for humans to become stewards of the biosphere and sustain development for
current and f­ uture generations.
The social-ecological approach isabout understanding intertwined social-­
ecological systems and the cross-scale
dynamics of the Anthropocene. We are
not constrained by, but often use, resilience thinking as a lens to ask newquestions and analyze complex systems
and particularly complex adaptive social-­
ecological systems. Capturing the interplay between periods of incremental
and abrupt changes – and how toadapt, persist and even transform into
new development pathways in the faceof dynamic change – is a research frontier, even in our interactions with policy,
practice, and the arts.
Within this framework, Centre researchers are using a diversity of theories, approaches, methods and perspectives, including co-production of know­ledge together with practitioners andother stakeholders. The research of theCentre requires in-depth collaboration,
not only among the researchers in
Stockholm, but also with our international networks of collaborators andtogether with diverse stakeholders.
Without such collaboration, the complexity of a wide range of issues would
be too difficult to grasp.

1

9

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Publications

Word cloud from abstracts 2014

Centre researchers continue topublish in top ranked journals
such as ­Nature, Science, Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences,
USA (PNAS), Nature Climate Change,
Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society B, Trends in Eco­logy
and Evolution (TREE), and Frontiersin Ecology and the Environment

Publications per discipline &publications in high impact journals
Not definedInterdisciplinary
Social science
Natural science
In journals with impact ≥4120
Number of publications

Since the start in 2007, we have accumulated a t­ otalof 600 journal publications, with 120 published in 2014
alone, plus another 19 reported online in 2014 (­officiallypublished in 2015).
Some 30 percent of the publications in 2014 appearedin the interdisciplinary journals Ambio, Ecological Economics, Ecology and Society, Global Environmental
Change, and PloS ONE, but there were also publications
in more disciplinary journals like Ecology, Ecology Letters, Oikos, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Europhysics Letters, and European Economic Review.
As many as thirty ‘new journals’ have been added to
the Centre’s list of publications. These include Children,
Youth and Environment, Climate of the Past Discussions,
Earth System Dynamics, Ecohydrology, Ecosphere, Environmental Modelling and Software, Fish and Fisheries,
Forest Ecology and Management, Land Use Policy, Society& Natural Resources, and Urban Forestry and Urban
Greening.
Three scientific books were published in 2014: one with
Edgar Elgar, one with Cambridge, one with MIT Press
and two books in the ArtScience interface. Moreover,there are 11 science book chapters and some 20 science,
policy, practice and outreach publications in 2014.
We are approaching ten thousand citations in
ISI Web of Science, with some 3400 citationsin 2014 alone.

80

40

0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

3444
2625

1679
999

Citations per year

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

199
2009

2008

007

6 53

569

Illustration: Jerker Lokrantz/Azote

10

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Research highlights
Wallenberg Foundation finances prominent collaboration with Stanford University
Over the past decade, two ideas have received significant
attention within the sustainability science community:
the first is that living natural capital – the Earth’s lands
and waters, and the biodiversity they embody – has tremendous, but often unrecognized, value that should befactored into decision-making. The second is that resilience – the capacity of a system to adapt or transform in
the face of dramatic change – is essential to long-termsustainability. These twin ideas have resulted in insightsthat now appear in the management thinking within pretty much all aspects of agriculture, water, energy, health,fisheries, forestry, mining and cities.
The Swedish Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation has decided to fund a scientific leadership programme that aims to develop these concepts further. Together, the Beijer Institute of the Royal Swedish Academyof Science, Stanford University and the Centre will form a
strategic partnership to make this knowledge maximallyuseful through major new tools, approaches, and interdisciplinary innovation. The effort will be led by senior research staff from Stanford and from the Centre but also
engage top young scientists who will become key individuals in this area for the future.
“The time is now ripe to formalize a research and scientific leadership platform for new theory, analysis, andsynthesis on the
management andgovernance of natural capital, resilience,and the biosphere,”says Centre science
director, Carl Folke.
“This is a perfectmoment to bring together the complementary approachesof Stanford’s Natural
Capital approachand the Centre resilience thinking,”­Folke continues.
Carl Folke
The scientificcontent of the programme will focus on the following: characterizing, managing and governing natural capital and ecosystem services; linking social and economic development to biospherestewardship; providing sustainable and healthy food andwater for a rapidly urbanizing world; and addressing human behavior, cognition, and mental well-being in an urbanizing, highly dynamic world.
The programme has a budget of approximately ninemillion SEK for the period July 2015-December 2019.

A closer look atsocial and biophysical­boundaries
How do we provide adequate and equitable accessto resources such as food,water, health care and energy while not overstressing critical physical boun­daries such as climatechange? Centre researcher
Steve Lade has received
funding from FORMAS todevelop innovative modelling and synthesis apSteve Ladeproaches to explore thecrucial interactions between social and biophysicalboundaries. Specifically, the project will look at the degree
to which approaching one social or biophysical boundary
affects the distance to other boundaries. Utilising his
modelling expertise from his background in theoreticalphysics, Steve Lade hopes the four-year project will engage not only the international scientific community, butalso key actors within business and science. “The research
will help inform a large business and policy user community amongst whom the planetary boundaries frame­work
has already gained considerable traction,” he says.

Funding boost to assess regime shifts
in the ­Anthropocene
Centre researcher Oonsie Biggs received a four-year juniorresearch grant from the Swedish Research Council to continue her work on assessing regime shifts in social-ecological systems. The grant will also provide resources to develop new approaches for assessing how much of theworld is at risk of particular regime shifts. To do this, shewill focus on the example of bush encroachment and use
remote sensing and GIS data to develop process-based
statistical models. “This project will help improve our scientific understanding and societal capacity to anticipate
and build resilience to high-­impact environmental regime
shifts,” says Oonsie Biggs.

Illustration: Jerker Lokrantz/azote

11

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Understanding of the links between
ecosystem services and poverty insouthern Africa
There is growing interest in the potential for ecosystem service-based
approaches to contribute to poverty
alleviation and advance sustainable
and equitable development. With afocus on southern Africa, Centre re-searchers Thomas Elmqvist, Oonsie
Biggs and Maria Tengö will evaluate
the implications for ecosystem service-­
based poverty alleviation strategies.
”We will combine qualitative andquantitative approaches, including
GIS analyses, statistical modelling,surveys, PhotoVoice and focus groupinterviews,” Biggs explains. The three-year project, which is funded by the
Swedish Research Council, aims to build
capacity and further develop science-­
policy networks through SAPECS, aCentre-led spin-off from PECS (Programme on Ecosystem Change andSociety) engaging scientists, practitioners and students in southern Africa.

Thomas Elmqvist

Oonsie Biggs

Maria Tengö

Connected risks, connected solutions – Exploring solutions and challenges towards transformative changeof governance.
Humanity seems to be moving towards a new predicament of multiple, global and interconnected risks. The
global food crisis in 2008-2009 coincided with the financial
crash of 2009, and recurrent outbreaks of novel infectious
diseases, and the cascading impacts of ongoing climatechange, are other recent examples.
“These interconnected
trends pose fundamental
challenges to international
institutions, law, networks
and partnerships. We wanted to explore what builds a
global capacity to cope withsurprise, shocks and propagating failures, from multiple disciplinary perspectives”, says Centre researcher
Victor Galaz, coordinating
author of the report “ConVictor Galaznected Risks, Connected
Solutions?” The report is the result of collaboration between scholars from a broad range of disciplines in several parts of the world including Jonas Tallberg (political science, Sweden), Ellen Hey (international law, Netherlands),
Arjen Boin (crisis management, Netherlands) and Frances
Westley (innovation studies, Canada), amongst others.

The report includes the following four main messages:• Social science insights about the governance of connected
global risks remain fragmented, but are complementary.
• Different models of governance address different critical
functions needed to govern global connected risks.
• There are several highly policy-relevant research gaps
with respect to innovation, legitimacy, and adaptability
in the face of change.
• Transformative changes of the governance of global­environmental risks are, indeed, possible.
The report was
funded by the
Global Challenges
Foundation. The
foundation works
to raise awarenessof the greatest
threats facing­humanity – inparticular climatechange, other environmental damage and politicalviolence – andhow these threats
are linked to poverty and the rapid
growth in global
population.

Connected Risks,Connected Solutions

Victor Galaz (coordinating author) with contributions from Diego Galafassi,
Jonas Tallberg, Ellen Hey, Arjen Boin, Claudia Ituarte-Lima, Jake Dunagan,
Frances Westley, Per Olsson, Robert Österbergh

12

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Changing Planet: New cluster on global change research
How is the human enterprise shaping the biosphere andhow can we become better stewards of planet Earth?
These were some of the questions that in 2014 drove researchers to form a new research cluster called ‘Changing
Planet’. The cluster primarily consists of researchers fromthe Stockholm Resilience Centre, the Beijer Institute ofLandmark report on biodiversity and urbanisation celebrates one year
As the Cities and Biodiversity Outlook (CBO)
saw its first anniversary, there was good reason
to celebrate. Since the launch in 2013, the CBO’s
scientific foundation – Urbanization, Biodiversity
and Ecosystem Services – was published as anopen access book by Springer and downloaded
more than 145,000 times. Within only nine months
after the launch, the book became one of the
30 most downloaded books in the Springer col-Ecological Economics and the Family Erling Persson Program – Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere.
‘Changing Planet’ is a response to the increasing need for
improved understanding of interactions between people
and ecosystems on larger scales. While previous researchhas done a great job mapping and quantifying the linkagesof many biophysical components on the planetary scale,there is still a poor understanding of social-ecological connectivity at that scale, argue the researchers behind theinitiative.
“The pace and extent of global changes means there isa pressing need to develop our understanding of how social processes are interconnected and how they drive andinteract with the processes of the biosphere,” explains­Beatrice Crona, member of the steering group.
For more information, go to www.changingplanet.selection of more than 170,000 titles. After one
year it became the fifth most downloaded bookin Springer’s Life Sciences series and the geographical distribution included downloads inmore than 100 countries.
The CBO was produced by Stockholm Resilience Centre together with the Secretariat of
the Convention on Biological ­Diversity (CBD), in
partnership with UN-Habitat and ICLEI – ­Local
Governments for Sustainability.

Johan Rockström receives the Woods Hole ResearchCenter’s Lawrence S. Huntington Environmental Prize
The Woods Hole Research Center is based in Massachusetts, US, and works at the intersection of land and climate
to investigate the causes and impacts of climate change.

The prize recognises leaders “who advance or promoteresearch and communication on climate, earth sciences,and conservation.” As such, prize recipients recognise theinterrelationships of global systems and planetary scale
thinking.
PHOTO: courtesy of Woods Hole Research Center

13

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Model Calendar

MΩD∑L
D∆R
C∆L∑N

2015

ls. It is athese mode
some ofomics andhighlights
gical Econ
calendarute of Ecolomodels. This the Beijer Instit
by manys at
is influenceda group of researcherbyms research
logical systes over a year
l discussion
in social-eco
ing
mode
Our thinkdinners andmonthlyre.
result ofience Cent
holm Resilthe Stock

During 2014 a group of researchers ­gathered
the models that are often used at the Centre
and the Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics.
The models were explained and illustrated
in a wall calendar for 2015

The world changes abruptly
A stich in time saves nine. - Anonymos“Our thinking in social-ecological systems researchis influenced by many models,” say Nanda Wijermans and Caroline Schill, two of the creators of thecalendar. “This calendar is a result of monthly dinners and discussion over the course of a year where
we have identified a selection of models that shaped
our thinking about social-ecological systems andmade an effort to explain and illustrate them.”
Download the calendar on the Centre­website. Search word: Model calendar

People cooperate, sometimes
The most powerful force ever on this planet ishuman cooperation – a force for construction
and destruction. - Jonathan Haidt

The world is adapting
It is not the strongest or the most intelligent
who will survive but those who can best managechange. - Charles Darwin

Illustrations: Elsa Wikander/Azote14

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Scientific publications
A selection of publications featured on our website

How Interpol and international
networks join forces to stop illegal
fishingÖsterblom, H. 2014. Catching up on
fisheries crime. Conservation Biology
28(3): 877-879.

Photo: Steven Zeff/Azote

Photo: Australian Customs
and Border Protection Service

Catching up on fisheries
crime

Looming on the conservation horizon
15 poorly known issues that may influence conservation in 2014
Sutherland, W.J., R. Aveling, T.M. Brooks, M. Clout, L.V. Dicks, L. Fellman,
E. Fleishman, D.W. Gibbons, B. Keim, F. Lickorish, K.A. Monk, D. Mortimer,
L.S. Peck, J. Pretty, J. Rockström, J.P. Rodriguez, R.K. Smith, M.D. Spalding,
F.H. Tonneijck, A.R. Watkinson. 2014. A horizon scan of global conservation­issues for 2014. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(1): 15-22.

Photo: Gunnar Aneer/Azote

Photo: Bent Christensen/azote

The pisces as parts of the whole
Back to the future
Unrealistic to think coral reefs can return to pristineconditions, more pragmatic management approaches
neededGraham, N.A.J., J.E. Cinner, A.V. Norström, M. Nyström.
2014. Coral reefs as novel ecosystems: Embracing new ­futures.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7: 9-14.

A strategy for implementing ecosystem-based fisheries­management in the Baltic Sea
Moellmann, C., M. Lindegren, T. Blenckner, L. Bergström,
M. Casini, R. Diekmann, J. Flinkman, B. Muller-Karulis,
S. Neuenfeldt, J. O. Schmidt, M. Tomczak, R. Voss, A. Gårdmark. 2014. Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management: From single-species to integrated ecosystem assessment and advice for Baltic Sea fish stocks. ICES Journal of
Marine Science 71(5): 1187-1197.

photo: Wikipedia CommonChildren of the involution
Why history matters in the creation ofsocial-­ecological traps
Boonstra, W.J., F.W. de Boer. 2014. The historical dynamics of social-ecological traps. Ambio
43(3):260-274.

15

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Nils Kautsky/Azote

Photo: Sandra Thunander

An ocean of innovation
A resilient contract with the ancestors
Amid social and environmental change, can an ancient Malagasy agropastoral ­tradition survive?
von Heland, J., C. Folke. 2014. A social contract with the ancestors: Culture
and ecosystem services in southern Madagascar. Global Environmental Change
24: 251-264.

Merrie, A., P. Olsson. 2014. An innovation and agency perspective on theemergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning. Marine Policy 44: 366-374.

Photo: Steven Zeff/Azote

Photo: Explain that stuff/Flickr

Planet tinkering
reconsidered

How theories of innovation andagency can explain the emergenceof Marine Spatial Planning

Using sulphate aerosols totackle dangerous climatechange unlikely to be agame-changer
Barrett, S., T.M. Lenton, A.
Millner, A. Tavoni, S. Carpenter, J.M. Anderies, F.S. Chapin
III, A.-S. Crépin, G. Daily,
P. Ehrlich, C. Folke, V. Galaz,T. Hughes, N. Kautsky, E.F.
Lambin, R. Naylor, K. Nyborg,
S. Polasky, M. Scheffer,
J. Wilen, A. Xepapadeas, A.
de Zeeuw. 2014. Climate engineering reconsidered. Nature
Climate Change 4:527-529.

Lessons learned from Stockholm
Paper summarises 15 years of Centre research in the Stockholm urban region
Andersson, E., S. Barthel, S. Borgström, J. Colding, T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, Å. Gren.
2014. Reconnecting cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure andurban ecosystem services. Ambio 43(4):445-453.

Special issue of Current Conservation
on why it’s time to start thinking of­cities as more than grey patches of­asphalt and ­concrete
Schervenius, M., Tengö (editors), Special­issue: What is the scope of nature incities? Current Conservation 8:1.

PHOTO: Andre Maslennikov/Azote

The case of nature in cities

16

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Ingemar Pettersson/Azote

Photo: Stuart Kininmonth

One fish or two fish?
Not just drawings on a map
Five features that can improve conservation efforts within marine­protected parks
Edgar, G.J., R.D. Stuart-Smith, T.J. Willis, S. Kininmonth, S.C. Baker, S. Banks,
N.S. Barrett, M.A. Becerro, A.T.F. Bernard, J. Berkhout, C.D. Buxton, S.J.
Campbell, A.T. Cooper, M. Davey, S. Edgar, G. Foersterra, D.E. Galvan, A.J.
Irigoyen, D.J. Kushner, R. Moura, P.E. Parnell, N.T. Shears, G. Soler, E.M.A.
Strain, R.J. Thomson. 2014. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine
protected areas with five key features. Nature 506(7487):216.

Consistent misreporting of fish
catches in the Baltic Sea has severe
consequences for marine ecosystems
Hentati-Sundberg, J., J. Hjelm, H.
Österblom. 2014. Does fisheries management incentivize non-compliance?
Estimated misreporting in the Swedish
Baltic Sea pelagic fishery based oncommercial fishing effort. ICES Journalof Marine Science 71(7): 1846-1853.

photo: Johan Enqvist

Photo: Robert Kautsky/Azote

Revealing parallels and ­synergies
New approach helps connect actors with diverse
knowledge about social-ecological governance
Tengö, M., E.S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvist, P. Malmer, M. Spierenburg. 2014. Connecting diverse knowledge systems forenhanced ecosystem governance: The multiple evidence baseapproach. Ambio 43(5): 579-591.

Centre researchers suggest policies and research formore resilient agriculture
Bennett, E.M., S.R. Carpenter, L.J. Gordon, N. Ramankutty,
P. Balvanera, B. Campbell, W. Cramer, J. Foley, C. Folke,
L. Karlberg, J. Liu, H. Lotze-Campen, N.D. Mueller, G.D.
Peterson, S. Polasky, J. Rockström, R.J. Scholes, and M.
Spirenburg. 2014. Toward a more resilient agriculture.
­Solutions 5 (5):65-75.

Citizen networks important for ensuring successful
management of urban ecosystems in growing cities
Enqvist, J., M. Tengö, Ö. Bodin. 2014. Citizen networks
in the Garden City: Protecting urban ecosystems in rapid­urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 24-35.

Photo: Jerker Lokrantz/Azot

Beyond marginally greener agriculture

Citizen networks in the Garden City

17

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

photo: A. G. Farran/UNAMID Flick

Photo: Andre Maslennikov/Azote

Beyond the quantity to the quality ofgreen areas
Centre researchers propose a complementary approachto managing biodiversity in urban landscapes
Andersson, E., J. Colding. 2014. Understanding how built
urban form influences biodiversity. Urban Forestry &­Urban Greening 13(2):221-226.

Consistent responses to unpredictable
eventsGalaz, V., H. Österblom, Ö. Bodin, B. Crona. Global networks and global change-induced tipping points. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics doi:10.1007/s10784-014-9253-6.

Photo: Le Carlsson/Azot

Photo: Tom Hermansson Snickars/Azote

Similarities found in global networks’ response tolarge-scale abrupt crises

Two steps forward, two steps backTransforming to community based management of­marine resources is no linear process
Abernethy, K.E., Ö. Bodin, P. Olsson, Z. Hilly, A.
Schwarz. 2014. Two steps forward, two steps back:The role of innovation in transforming towards community-based marine resource management in Solomon­Islands. Global Environmental Change 28:309-321.

Photo: Tony Svensson/Azote

Social networks matter
Navigating existing social networks and planningfor future ones are important in co-management of­resources on the coast
Sandström, A., B. Crona, Ö. Bodin. 2014. Legitimacy inco-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social
networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy
and Governance 24(1): 60-76.

Redefining the biodiversity boundary –beyond the countResearchers argue that genetic and functional diversity
as well as biome health are important metrics for biodiversity
Mace, G.M., B. Reyers, R. Alkemade, R. Biggs, F. Chapin,
I. Stuart, S.E. Cornell, S. Diaz, S. Jennings, P. Leadley, P.J.
Mumby, A. Purvis, R.J. Scholes, A.W.R. Seddon, M. Solan,
W. Steffen, G. Woodward. 2014. Approaches to defining aplanetary boundary for biodiversity. Global Environmental
Change 28: 289-297.

18

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Niklas Virsen/Azote

Photo: André Maslennikov/Azote

Mapping out a resilient future

If at first you don’t succeed“Learning by doing” in resource management is put tothe test in modelling scenarios

Human development within Earth’s safe operating
space is possible

Lindkvist, E., J. Norberg. 2014. Modeling experiential learning: The challenges posed by threshold dynamics for sustainable renewable resource management. Ecological Economics
104: 107-118.

Gerst, M.D., P.D. Raskin, J. Rockström. 2014. Contours ofa resilient global f­ uture. Sustainability 6(1): 123-135.

Photo: Tom Hermansson Snickars/Azote

Photo: Rainforest Action Network/Flickr

Matching strategy with opportunity
Changing the trajectory of marine resource governance­requires addressing the social context of change-makers
von Heland, F., J. Clifton, P. Olsson. 2014. Improving
steward­ship of marine resources: Linking strategy to opportunity. Sustainability 6(7): 4470-4496.

Photo: Ewa Wisniewska/Azote

Business-as-usual interrupted
Degradation of biodiversity and ecosystem services
could be far greater than was previously predicted.
New study identifies key policy and management opportunities that can reduce or avoid damaging shifts
Leadley, P., V. Proenca, J. Fernandez-Manjarres, H. M. Pereira,R. Alkemade, R. Biggs, E. Bruley, W. Cheung, D. Cooper,
J. Figueiredo, E. Gilman, S. Guenette, G. Hurtt, C. Mbow,
T. Oberdorff, C. Revenga, J. P. W. Scharlemann, R. Scholes,
M.S. Smith, U.R. Sumaila, M. Walpole. 2014. Interacting­regional-scale regime shifts for biodiversity and ecosystemservices. BioScience 64(8): 665-679.

What makes the urban ecosystem tick?
Understanding how urban ecosystems function is important for ensuring human well-being and preventing
continued ­biodiversity loss
Haase, D., N. Frantzeskaki, T. Elmqvist. 2014. Ecosystemservices in urban landscapes: Practical applications and­governance implications. Ambio 43(4-SI): 407-412.

19

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Anders Tedeholm/Azote

No panacea

Nykvist, B. 2014. Does social learning lead to better natural
resource management? A case study of the modern farming
community of practice in Sweden. Society & Natural­Resources 27(4): 436-450.

Social learning important, but no guarantee for­improved natural r­ esource management

Photo: Nicolas Desagher/Azote

Photo: Steven Zeff/Azote

The final Wild West
Increasing exploitation of ocean areas beyond national
jurisdiction present serious governance challenges
Merrie, A., D.C. Dunn, M. Metian, A.M. Boustany, Y. Takei,
A.O. Elferink, Y. Ota, V. Christensen, P.N. Halpin, H. Öster­
blom. 2014. An ocean of surprises: Trends in human use,
­unexpected dynamics and governance challenges in areas­beyond national jurisdiction. Global Environmental Change
27: 19-31.

No ecosystem is an island
Why countryside biogeography rather than island bio­
geography is essential to conservation strategy in agricultural ecosystems
Mendenhall, C.D., D.S. Karp, C.F.J. Meyer, E.A. Hadly, G.C.
Daily. 2014. Predicting biodiversity change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509(7499): 213-217.

20

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Max Troell/Azote

Photo: Fredrik Wilde/Azote

Urban sustainability – a child’s play?
Children who spend more time in nature show a better­understanding of both natural resources and environmental degradation
Giusti, M., S. Barthel, L. Marcus. 2014. Nature routines andaffinity with the biosphere: A case study of preschool children in Stockholm. Children, Youth and Environments 24(3),16-42.

Farming aquatic animals for global foodsystem resilience
Does aquaculture add resilience to the world’s food
portfolio?

Photo: Eugene Wei/Flickr

Troell, M., R.L. Naylor, M. Metian, M. Beveridge, P.H. ­Tyedmers,
C. Folke, K.J. Arrow, S. Barrett, A.-S. Crepin, P.R. Ehr­lich,Å. Gren, N. Kautsky, S.A. Levin, K. Nyborg, H. Österblom,
S. Polasky, M. Scheffer, B.H. Walker, T. Xepapadeas, A. de
Zeeuw. 2014. Does aquaculture add resilience to the global
food system? Proceedings of the National Aca­demy of ­Sciencesof the United States of America 111(37): 13257-13263.

Photo: Andre Maslennikov/Azote

Safe and just regional social-ecologicalsystems
Researchers propose a framework for defining a safeand just operating space integrating social wellbeing
into planetary boundaries on regional levels

Three keys to successful SDGs

Dearing, J.A., R. Wang, K. Zhang, J.G. Dyke, H. Haberl,
M.S. Hossain, P.G. Langdon, T. Lenton, K. Raworth, S.
Brown, J. Carstensen, M.J. Cole, S.E. Cornell, T.P. Dawson,
C.P. Doncaster, F. Eigenbrod, M. Floerke, E. Jeffers, A.W.
Mackay, B. Nykvist, G.M. Poppy. 2014. Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems. Global­Environmental Change 28:227-238.

Norström, A.V., A. Dannenberg, G. McCarney, M. Milkoreit,
F. Diekert, G. Engström, R. Fishman, J. Gars, E. Kyriako­
poolou, V. Manoussi, K. Meng, M. Metian, M. Sanctuary,
M. Schlüter, M. Schoon, L. Schultz, M. Sjöstedt. 2014. Three
necessary conditions for establishing effective Sustainable
Development Goals in the Anthropocene. Ecology and­Society 19(3): 8.

Researchers identify conditions necessary for the SDGs
to be effective in the Anthropocene

21

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Bengt Ekberg/Azote

Photo: Martin Almqvist/Azote

Diversity in fishers’ behaviour; a matterof style
Inefficient fisheries management can be effectivised by­further classifying fishing practices and styles

The hidden cost of coerced resilience

Boonstra, W.J., J. Hentati-Sundberg. Classifying fishers’ behaviour: An invitation to fishing styles. Fish and Fisheries
doi:10.1111/faf.12092

Centre researchers look into forced resilience of intensive ­agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture
systems

Farming of bluefin tuna is increasing, but official­estimates are far below actual production
Metian, M., S. Pouil, A. Boustany, M. Troell. 2014. Farmingof bluefin tuna: Reconsidering global estimates and sustainability concerns. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 22(3): 184-192.

Photo: Oskar Henriksson/Azote

Photo: Max Troell/Azote

Out of tune

Rist, L., A. Felton, M. Nyström, M. Troell, R.A. Sponseller,
J. Bengtsson, H. Österblom, R. Lindborg, P. Tidåker, D.G.
Angeler, R. Milestad, J. Moen. 2014. Applying resilience
thinking to production ecosystems. Ecosphere 5(6): 73.

Winners and losers – the ups anddowns of marine conservation
Study highlights that people’s experiences with marine­reserves are affected by a range of social conditions
Cinner, J.E., T. Daw, C. Huchery, P. Thoya, A. Wamukota,
M. Cedras, C. Abunge. 2014 Winners and losers in marine
conservation: Fishers’ displacement and livelihood benefits
from marine reserves. Society & Natural Resources27(9):994-1005.

22

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Torbjorn Kape/Azote

Photo: Hasse Dahlgren/Azote

Fit to work

Results of conservation efforts are linked to the match­between social-ecological structures and processes

Management of fragmented urban landscapes is challenging; network analysis can help improve it

Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, M. Thyresson, A.-l. Golz, M. Tengö.
2014. Conservation success as a function of good alignmentof social and ecological structures and processes. Conservation Biology 28(5):1371-1379.

Bergsten, A., D. Galafassi, Ö. Bodin. 2014. The problem of
spatial fit in social-ecological systems: detecting mismatches
between ecological connectivity and land management in an
urban region. Ecology and Society 19(4):6.

A need to see the forest and the trees

Queiroz, C., R. Beilin, C. Folke, R. Lindborg. 2014. Farmland abandonment: Threat or opportunity for biodiversity
conservation? A global review. Frontiers in Ecology and theEnvironment 12(5): 288-296.

Photo: Ulf Grünbaum/Azote

Survival of the best fit

How farmland abandonment is reported and assessed­impacts if it’s seen as threat or opportunity and canhave implications for policy

23

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Books
The Anthropocene Gap – Will technology save the day?
Victor Galaz discusses how technology poses novel risks, but also provides
new possibilities
We live on an increasingly humandomi­nated planet. Our impact on the
Earth has become so big that researchers
now suggest that it merits its own geological epoch - the ‘Anthropocene’ –where humanity is influencing every­aspect of the Earth on a scale akin to
the great forces of nature. But with the
Anthropocene comes the ‘Anthropocene
Gap’, society’s current failure to address
the most profound environmental challenges of our time.
This is the subject of a book by Centre
researcher Victor Galaz, entitled “Global
Environmental Governance, Technology
and Politics - The Anthropocene Gap”,
published by Edward Elgar in 2014. The
book combines theory development
and case studies of ‘planetary bounda-

ries’, emerging infectious diseases,­financial markets and geoengineering
to further explore the meaning behindthe ‘Anthropocene Gap’. Galaz explores
how technological change not only poses new environmental risks, but also
new possibilities for collective action.
“I elaborate on the argument that ourtransition into the Anthropocene presents fundamentally different environmental political challenges than thoseexperienced before. For example, we needto develop institutions and governancemechanisms that are robust enough todeal with the increasingly complex environmental issues we are facing while
also allowing for fail-safe experimentation and continuous learning,” Galazexplains.

Building water resilience for human prosperity
Introducing a new framework for water governance and management
Water is the bloodstream of nature, and wise stewardship offreshwater is central to human development and prosperity.
But over-use and mismanagement of freshwater resources
now threatens the functioning of ecosystems that are crucial
to human activities.
If the pressure on the water cycle becomes too great, it canlead to unpredictable andpotentially irreversible
changes that affect humandevelopment and wellbeing.
“Water Resilience for
Human Prosperity” waspublished in 2014 and written by Centre researchersand colleagues from Stockholm Environment Institute, the Potsdam Institutefor Climate Impact Research and the Institute forEnvironmental Systems Research at the University of Osnabrück. The book analyses the problems and provides examples of successful water resource management with a particular focus on what builds resilience.
“We have looked at feedbacks in social-ecological systems,
the processes that maintain a system as it is, and that can bechanged by external pressures, causing the system to radicallychange. Understanding these feedbacks can be of help inbuilding water resilience,” says Centre researcher Line Gordon,
co-author of the book.
The authors argue that through careful management ofwater resources, and knowledge of the interaction between
humans and nature, we can maximise the sustainable use oflimited available resources.
The key message of Water Resilience for Human Prosperity
is that by identifying and understanding the available water
resources, and how it generates multiple benefits for humans
and nature, we can find solutions that provide prosperity
longer and for more people.

24

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Reflections on people and the biosp

Carl Folke reflects on 30 years of research in new photo book. The book Reflections
Carl Folke and ­designer/art d­ irector Lars Hall was released in 2014. The art-scien­together with a set of unique photos from the Stockholm ­Archipelago during theUsing quotes from songs by international artists, and insightsfrom his own and others’ research on social-ecological systems, Carl Folke describes the dynamic relationship between
humans and the biosphere in a thought-provoking manner.
The images and the text interact with a rhythm, reminding us
again and again of the importance of reconnecting our socialand economic systems to the biosphere.
“The whole book represents a mind-shift, from treating
the planet as an externality to recognizing that we are for ourown development strongly dependent on the resilience of thebiosphere – the thin layer of life that we are embedded partsof “ explains Carl Folke. In Reflections he has chosen towork with an artistic expression to communicate scientific­insights, adding a perspective that can complement those­research findings that clarify the need to reconnect to the­biosphere.
The photos in the book are from Lars Hall’s personal collection, and the result of documenting a particular location in
Stockholm’s northern archipelago with a strong sense of placein nature. From the exact same spot at Grillskäret island, seasons and changes throughout the day have been documented
with his camera for 30 years. The result is a unique exposé

25

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: lars hallpheres – on People and the Biosphere by C
­ entre Science Director
nce book features insights from 30 years of resilience researche same time periodof nature’s shifting scenes – from a peaceful atmosphere to
the dramatically menacing.
Lars Hall is legendary within the field of design throughhis work at Hall&Cederquist during the 1970s and Lars Hall
Design AB from 1990 onwards. He has been a key advocate
for the photographic image via the gallery Camera Obscurathat he established back in the 1970s.
The book project was exhibited as an installation at theart museum Artipelag, where the slide show “Reflections on
Mankind and the Biosphere” was on display during the s­ ummerof 2014. Selected parts of Reflections, published by Langen­skiöld Publishers in 2014, will be shown mid-April to midMay 2015 as an outdoor exhibition at the Raoul Wallen­berg’s Square, Nybroplan in central parts of Stockholm.

“The photos and the selected music quotes
capture the emotional connection to thebiosphere that we all are a part of.”Dr Carl Folke, Centre science director

26

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Where in the world are we?
Examples of where Centre research is conducted around the world
See more examples via our online research map, www.stockholmresilience.su.se/map

us–hawai i

EcuadorU ruguay

Study shows thatalgae-eating fish
are key to avoiding
regime shifts on
Hawaiian coral
reefs

The Quito II dialogue included 90
participants exploring ways toscale up financing
for biodiversity

Smarter water
management
crucial for Uruguay’s growing
livestock production

WEST AFRICA
SAH EL
Ecosystem services isa good lens for integration of know­l edge on
how trees contributeto livelihoods

Tanzan ia
Holistic approaches to sub-Saharanfarming can unlock poverty traps

Short movies describe the scienceand practice­b ehind common
property initiatives in cities

Sea birds areimportant indicators forwhat goes on
beneath thesea surface

Study lists six
steps to boost organic farming anddecrease pressure
on the Baltic Sea

The rise and fallof the Soviet­Union contributed
to marine regime
shiftsChanges in the
Arctic will affectecosystems, communities and­i ndustrial infrastructure

germany

swedenBaltic r egion

russiaTh e ArctiC

madagascar

eth iopia

i n diaI n don esia

Uzbekistan

A contract withthe ancestors­influences thelong-­t erm persistence of the agro­
pastoral system
in Androy

New assessment
tool can help optimise water harvesting and boost
food security in
Ethiopia

Citizen networks
are important for
ensuring successful managementof urban ecosystems in growing
citiesStudy shows that
history mattersin the creation ofsocial-ecologicaltraps

Reducing climatechange vulnerability around
Amudarya Riverdelta is possible
but measures are
considerable

27

28

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Policy, practice and outreach
Photo Tom Hermansson Snickars/Azote

SwedBio – a bridging organisation
SwedBio is an international knowledge interface working with ecosystemgovernance and management through a resilience perspective
SwedBio bridges and facilitates learning and innovations­between knowledge systems and cultures on issues such as
poverty alleviation, equity, sustainable livelihoods and governance of social-ecological systems rich in biodiversity. It
helps develop new policies and methods by facilitating multi-actor dialogues and contributions to strategic programmes
in developing countries. It has been part of Stockholm Resilience Centre since 2011 and collaborates closely with a growing number of Centre researchers.
During recent years, SwedBio has played a unique role asorganiser and facilitator of dialogues between diverse actors
such as UN organisations, governments, scientists, civil society – including indigenous peoples’ and local communities’ organisations – as well as the private sector. In this spirit of dialogue and co-generation of knowledge, SwedBio also
contributes to method developments related to resilience as-

sessments such as the Multiple Evidence Base approach andBiodiversity Financing Mechanism, including Safeguards.
SwedBio is mainly funded by the Swedish International
Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). It contributes to­international processes such as the Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD), the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) and the
UN-led process to develop Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs). Through financial support, SwedBio also contributes
to strategic programmes in developing countries, collaborations that often also result in mutual learning.
“The close collaboration with Centre researchers has createdimportant synergies for learning and method development thathave been beneficial for both SwedBio and the researchers,”
says Maria Schultz, director of SwedBio.

29

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Towards Sustainable Development Goals
Stockholm Resilience Centre and SwedBio continue to be involved in the
post-2015 development agenda and the UN Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs)
Most work in relation to the SDGs has taken place throughor within the Sustainable Development Solutions Network(SDSN), launched in August 2012 by UN Secretary-General
Ban Ki-moon, to bring together academia, business, administrations and civil society to discuss strategies for sustainable
development in the light of the post 2015 development agenda. Centre Director Johan Rockström is part of the Executive
Committee, which acts as the board of the network. The network has twelve thematic groups whose work is solutions-­
oriented and provides high quality information to decision
makers and the public within their respective theme.
For 2015, the Centre is continuing its collaboration with
SDSN, focusing on a new ground breaking project “TheWorld in 2050” lead by SDSN together with the Earth Institute at Columbia University, the International Institute forApplied Systems Analysis (IIASA), and the Centre. The project
aims to explore the implications of the necessary transformative sustainable development pathways and the possible‘­degrees of freedom’ to meet economic development goals
within a safe operating space of a stable planet.
Centre professor Thomas Elmqvist participated at theOpen Working Groups 7th meeting in New York on thedevelop­ment of Goal 11 on resilient and sustainable urbanisation. Together with the SDSN urban team, he co-authoredan analysis of the targets and indicators related to goal 11,
highlighting the need to apply a multiple scale approach forresilience and for sustainability analyses to be meaningful.
Together with researchers at the Centre, SwedBio has had
an a­ ctive dialogue and contributed with comments and­inputs for outcome drafts from the SDG’s Open Working
Group meetings and SDSN, both regarding the Goals and­Financing Sustainable Development. The areas that have been
given main focus are those related to the Planetary Boundaries and the research at the Centre such as ecosystem services,bio­diversity, marine issues, agriculture and urban issues.

photo e. HERMANSSON-török

30

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Contributing to Convention on Biological Diversity
Stockholm Resilience Centre and SwedBio active at COP 12
photo: E. Hermansson-Török

Centre researcher Thomas Elmqvist (third left) at the Biodiversity Summit for Cities and Subnational Governments.

The 12th Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Bio­­logical Diversity (COP12) took place in Pyeongchang, Repub­
lic of Korea 6 – 17 October 2014. The results of COP 12­indicate that, while progress is being made in conserving andsustainably using biodiversity, governments need to increase
efforts if they are to end biodiversity loss.
Pernilla Malmer and Maria Schultz from SwedBio were
nominated by the Swedish government and were part of theSwedish delegation. They contributed to discussions on biocultural diversity including indigenous peoples and localcom­munities, and financing for biodiversity. COP12 adopted
guidelines for the integration of biodiversity and poverty
eradication for sustainable development, after negotiations
chaired by SwedBio. Maria Schultz was also a member of theHigh-Level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for­Implementing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets under the Convention on Biological Diversity, resulting in a report that waswell received during COP12.
Centre researcher Claudia Ituarte-Lima was present as anenvironmental law specialist advising negotiations on safeguards under Biodiversity Financing Mechanisms. The report“Biodiversity financing and safeguards: lessons learned andproposed guidelines” by her and colleagues formed the decision on voluntary guidelines for safeguards in Bio­diversity­Financing Mechanisms.
Ellika Hermansson Török, Thomas Elmqvist and LouiseHård af Segerstad from the Centre took part in the Biodiversity Summit for Cities and Subnational Governments, andhosted a launch of the SwedBio financed new urban ­capacity
building programme Urban Natural Assets for Africa together with partners.
All in all, the Centre and SwedBio arran­ged seven side
events with partners on different issues and contributed as
speakers or moderators to another ­seven side events during
two intense conference weeks.

Community Based monitoring welcomed by COP12
Multiple Evidence Approach receives international recognition
COP12 also saw the ground-breaking agreement to change
the terminology to “Indigenous peoples and local communities” after negotiations chaired by SwedBio staff member andSwedish delegate Pernilla Malmer. The (s) in “peoples” provides recognition for their diverse cultures and knowledge.
This decision follows in line with the UN Declaration on the
Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Read more about the work around MEB on the Centre
website. Search for: “Multiple evidence base”
photo p malmer

SwedBio has over the last decade supported partner organizations among indigenous peoples and local communities inthe development of community-based monitoring of the status and trends of biodiversity and local resources in their­territories.This bottom-up approach to monitoring was welcomed at the 12th Conference of the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP12) and will be further piloted and used. Combined with a Multiple Evidence Base (MEB)
approach, community-based monitoring can support efforts
to reach the Aichi Targets for biodiversity.
The MEB approach aims to connect knowledge systems
on an equal basis as a means to generate new and deeper­insights, which are legitimate, credible and useful for all involved actors. It has been developed in transdisciplinary collaboration between Centre researchers, SwedBio and partners
on the ground. MEB has received significant attention in thescience-policy-practice community and is recognized as agreat opportunity by the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).

31

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

PHOTO: n. hällström

Concluding panel with Francisco Prieto – Ecuador Ministry of Environment, Walter Schuldt – Ecuador Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Seukwoo Kang –COP12 host Republic of Korea, Braulio Dias – Executive Secretary of CBD, Hem Pande – Ministry of Environment India, Maria Schultz – Stockholm
Resilience Centre, and Sabino Francis Ogwal – National Environment Management Authority, Uganda.

The Quito II Dialogue helped facilitate key negotiations
on biodiversity financing
Following the success of the 2012 Quito dialogue, SwedBio co-organised
a second multi-actor dialogue to explore ways to scale up the mobilization of financial resources for the Aichi Biodiversity Targets under theConvention on Biological Diversity
The Quito II dialogue was convened by the governments ofEcuador, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Norway, Sweden,
Uganda, the European Commission and the Secretariat of theConvention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
Nearly 90 participants – nominated via the CBD Secretariat– attended the dialogue, including representatives from government, civil society, indigenous peoples and local communities, intergovernmental institutions and academia.
“It was acknowledged that biodiversity financing such as
Payments for ecosystem services or ecological compensation(biodiversity offsets) can be implemented in very different
ways, tailored to the political cultures in different countries.
Strong opinions concerning the role of the ’market’ could
therefore be processed during this dialogue seminar”, says
Centre researcher Thomas Hahn.
“The importance of legal systems and safeguards that cancontribute to socio-ecological benefits and equitable governance was discussed, building on a report on safeguards by
SwedBio/Stockholm Resilience Centre,” says Claudia Ituarte-Lima, researcher at the Centre and lead author of the report “Biodiversity financing and safeguards: lessons learned
and proposed guidelines.” This report became an information
document for CBD COP12, which took place in the Republicof Korea in 2014. It also formed the decision on voluntary
guidelines for safeguards in Biodiversity Financing Mechanisms that was adopted by the 193 CBD parties at COP12.

The dialogue offered an opportunity for mutual learning
between diverse actors, and was considered by the CBD Secretariat to have facilitated the negotiations at COP12. The
Quito II co-chairs’ report became a background document
to the CBD negotiations. The outcomes were presented in thefirst day of the preparatory negotiations of COP12, and the
dialogue was referred to in the negotiation text and final
CBD-COP 12 Decision.
Download the Quito II co-chairs’ report and the Safeguards report from the Centre website, search word: Quito II
dialogue.
The aim of Quito II was to contribute to shared understanding and clarification of a number of issues related
to the mobilization of financial resources:• values and mainstreaming of biodiversity• governance, safeguards and equity• financing mechanisms and incentives such as payment
for ecosystem services and compensation schemes• the role of private and financial sectors• fiscal reforms and international levies• synergies for biodiversity financing with climate change
financing, Sustainable Development Goals and overseas development assistance.

32

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: Stockholm Resilience Centre/EAT Food Forum

Marie Söderqvist, Director General at Livsmedelsföretagen; Lena Ek, Minister for the Environment; Ove Andersson, vice Chairman, Swedish Medical
Association; and Centre Director Johan Rockström discussing how different sectors can cooperate to promote a healthy and sustainable food system.

Innovation, food and the Baltic Sea at Almedalen­political week
Stockholm Resilience Centre contributed to a number of events during
Almedalsveckan 2014 – the political forum held in Visby on the Swedish
island of Gotland every summer
Photo: M. Haeggman

The seminars which the Centre organized or where partof, revolved around issues concerning ways forward
for Sweden in innovation and competition such as how
to improve the outcomes of innovation investments,
how to improve the Baltic Sea and how to solve environmental and health challenges in food production.
The Centre also arranged a field-trip to the island of
Stora Karlsö for a number of members in the Swedish
Parliament. Stora Karlsö is a field site where Centre­researchers have a long tradition of studying sea bird
populations and their interactions with the Baltic Sea
ecosystem. The visit provided an opportunity for discussions, for participating in research activities (birdringing) and for a moment of reflection in n
­ ature, during an otherwise very hectic week of debating.

The island of Stora Karlsö is home to the Common Murre andhas the largest seabird community in the Baltic Sea. Studies ofthe Murre population in the island have led to important insights
about interactions between humans and nature.

33

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Joining together for the ­urban future of Mälardalen
A day for joint learning, inventory of knowledge and identification of­future challenges
ing practical results from the work we have been doing,” says
Sara Borgström, urban researcher at the Centre and coordinator of the conference.
photo M.Haeggman

The rapidly changing Mälaren region has over the last ten
years become an increasingly interesting region for researchon urban-rural issues and is now also one of the regional casestudies within the research programme PECS.
On 7 November 2014 the Urban research theme at the ­Centreorganised a conference, gathering a group of 70 actors from
the Mälaren region in Sweden, including municipal planners,
NGOs, grass root activists, and representatives from associations and state agencies. The purpose was to share researchfindings and discuss the future of the region.
”Over the years we have been collaborating with different
actors in the region. They have contributed with importantdata and information for our research, and we are now see-Documenting coral conservation efforts in Hawaii
A video documentary to present the state of coral reefs and the people
working to save them
Coral Guardians is a project that combines cultural activities
and scientific exchange to highlight successful coral reef stewardship and contribute to mutual learning. It is hosted by­Albaeco and done in cooperation with Stockholm ResilienceCentre. The main activity in the project is to co-arrange coral
reef conservation seminars fully integrated in concerts.
In November 2014 Coral Guardians went on a network-

ing and learning journey to Hawai’i. Centre communicator
Marika Haeggman, together with saxophonist Anders Paulsson and producer Mathias Walin, met with researchers,
teachers, students, musicians, community leaders, scientists
and volunteers engaged in marine issues and coral reefs. Manyof the meetings were documented on video and will be presented in a documentary during the spring of 2015.
photo M.Walin

34

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

LEAD – Resilience thinking, exponential technologies
and sustainable leadership
Training programme on resilience thinking and exponential technologies
generate exciting new ideas and solutions to a specific problem which in turn could contribute to large-scale, transformative change,” says Centre researcher and programme coordinator Per Olsson.
Credit: C. Morin

During the fall of 2014, the four-month long training programme LEAD – Resilience thinking, exponential technologies and sustainable leadership programme - gathered future
leaders and change makers from Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia,
Poland, Moldova, Ukraine, Russia and Sweden to explain
more about concepts like the Anthropocene, resilience thinking, social-ecological systems, exponential technologies, andhow they relate to human wellbeing and transformations forsustainability.
The programme, which was a joint initiative between theCentre and the Swedish Institute, consisted of three modules:
the first and last held in Stockholm and the second one in
Tallinn, Estonia. During the modules, lectures, workshops
and discussions covered the current reality of global environmental change linked to the latest insights on artificial intelligence, sensor networks, robotics, machine learning and otheraspects of exponential technologies.
“By combining our research with the diverse set of backgrounds, skills and ideas of these change makers we could

Visualising resilience research
Creative collaboration to communicate complex concepts
Research at the Centre deals with many concepts that tend to
be rather complicated to communicate to non-technical audiences such as governments, funding agencies and the members of the public. As a part of the on-going efforts to communicate scientific findings in new and creative ways, Centre
researchers and communications team took part in an educational collaboration with Berghs School of Communicationin the spring of 2014.
Berghs School of Communication is a leading institutionin advertising and marketing education in Sweden. The col-laboration with the Centre was initiated through Pål Pettersson, Course Director at Berghs’ Department of Graphic Design.
The course itself was curated by Joe Coppard, Creative­Director, and Centre researcher Victor Galaz together witha group of colleagues.
“As scientists, we are used to communicating through longpieces of text, and occasional tables and figures. This joint
project allowed us all to work more creatively, and sometimes
with quite complex scientific concepts. The end result: stunningpieces of art with a deeper message,” Victor Galaz explains.
photo: M.JÄNGÖ/VIEMO

35

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Examples of regime shifts fromaround the world
The regime shifts database aims to improve understanding of changes
that impact ecosystem services and human wellbeing
What do coastal marine eutrophication, West Antarctic ice
sheet collapse and bush encroachment have in common?
They are all considered to be regime shifts, or large, persistent changes in the structure and function of social-ecologicalsystems, with substantive impacts on the suite of ecosystemservices provided by these systems.
Regime shifts are notoriously difficult to predict. They
­typically cause substantial changes in ecosystem services
that come as a surprise, and by the time society reacts, thesechanges are most often difficult and costly to reverse.
The first online database of regime shifts was officiallylaunched in 2014, after five years of development. It provides
researchers, practitioners and students with an extensive
portfolio of different examples of regime shifts that havelarge impacts on ecosystem services and human well-being.
Each example is accompanied by an in-depth description of
how the regime shift works, the impacts it has, and how

managers can build resilience to the shift, as well as an
assessment of how well the regime shift is understood. The
website, www.regimeshifts.org, is a product of the Regime
Shifts theme at the Centre and the idea of researchers Oonsie
Biggs and Garry Peterson.
“Better understanding of regime shifts is important as they
may have substantial impacts on human economies, societies
and well-being,” Oonsie Biggs says.
The website aims to help build a community of regime
shift researchers and practioners, by enabling people to contribute or suggest their own examples of regime shifts for­inclusion in the database. The database already featurescontributions from many people from around the world.
“By collecting a wide range of examples of regime shifts,
we can better understand how the drivers and impacts of regime shifts vary in different contexts, and more importantly,
potentially identify new types of regime shifts.”

36

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Seminars and events
Resilience 2014 – Montpellier, France
In May 2014 the third Resilience Conference was held in Montpellier,France, gathering more than 900 researchers, practitioners and students
from around the world
Stockholm Resilience Centre was co-organiser of the conference, with Centre researcher Elin Enfors on the organisingcommittee and ­Scientific Director Carl Folke on the scientificcommittee.
The theme of the conference was ”Resilience and Develop­
ment – Mobilizing for Transformation,” and the objective was
to explore and reinforce the links between resilience thinking
and development issues.
Photo M.Haeggman“We wanted to try to bring together these two worlds,” says
Francois Bousquet, from CIRAD, one of the main ­organisersof the conference.
“Within both social-ecological thinking and development,
resilience is no longer a buzz word but an approach that governments, NGOs and researchers try to apply. At the moment
the two worlds do not really know each other, so with thisconference we wanted them to meet and to see how they canwork together.”Over the course of four days, 36 researchers and 17 PhD
students from the Centre contributed with a total of 98 pre­sentations and chaired 16 sessions. Seven Centre master’s­students contributed with presentations and posters.
The PhD students were put in charge of the closing ceremony of the conference. They took on the task combining
music, theatre, research and a synthesis of the main messages,
discussions and tweets from the conference.
Photo M.Haeggman

Centre PhD student Vanessa Masterson presents her research during
one of the off-site sessions.

Centre researcher Romina Marten facilitates a board game developed toillustrate the dynamics of reseource management and cooperation.

37

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: R. Kautsky/Azote

The auditorium at the conference centre Le Corum housed the conference key notes and panel discussions.
Photo: M.Haeggman

Photo: R. Kautsky/Azote

As part of the ArtScience programme the conference hosted two photo
exhibitions illustrating effects of environmental degradation.

A local practitioners’ group presents their work with preserving a wetland during one of the off-site sessions.
Photo: R. Kautsky/Azote

The PhD students led the closing session of the conference, summarizing the main points and discussions from the four days through theatre,­presentations and social media analysis.

38

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo A. EMMELIN

EAT Director Gunhild A. Stordalen (left) together with the forum host Anne Lindmo and Centre director and Chair of the EAT Advisory Board,­Johan Rockström.

Better food for a better planet
Centre co-hosted international conference on close connections­between food production, health and sustainable development
In 2014 Stockholm Resilience Centre together with the Norwegian Stordalen Foundation initiated an international high-level
forum called The EAT Stockholm Food Forum, linking food,health and sustainability across the fields of a­ cademia, business and politics.

”The intention is to show that population growth, climatechange, human health, resource management, sustainability
and food security are not only fields of research – but also
important political issues and exciting business opportunities,” says Centre director Johan Rockström.

irinatikomirova @irinatikomirova

kateraworth @kateraworthsashitharoor @sashitharoor

dralessandrodemaio @dralessandrodemaio
A healthy #environment is the basis of a strong #economy. We must find ways to have both. #EATforum
now. #Stockholm@RichardMcLellan: If you take care of your mother,
she takes care of you.

Prince Charles to the #EATforum more peolple in theworld are obese than hungry today. Need for integrated solutions

The amount of food needed to end hunger globally isjust 10% of what is not even being eaten. #EATforum

39

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

The forum, also known as EAT, is a global initiative, createdin collaboration with prominent academic partners such as
CGIAR, Harvard University, New York Academy of Sciences,
Cornell University and The Sackler Institute for Nutrition
Research.
New and more integrated knowledge
The main objective of EAT is to increase interdisciplinary
knowledge on food and food production, thereby improving
nutrition and food safety, and tackling global challenges suchas the increase in non-communicable diseases, climate change
and environmental damage.
“Human prosperity is determined by our ability to be wise
stewards of food, health and sustainability, recognizing thatthey are like the Three Musketeers, one for all, all for one,”says Centre director Johan Rockström.
Photo; A. EMMELIN

clear: what you eat not only determines your health but also
the health of our planet.
“We become what we eat. The planet becomes what we eat.
We need to find i­nter-connected solutions, across sectors. The
right choice of food can not only help save the planet and improve our health, but also create new business opportunities.
EAT will spearhead a holistic approach to today’s food related challenges,” says Gunhild Stordalen, director of the EAT
Initiative.
The forum was not just about addressing the nexus offood, health and sustainability; it was just as much about­creating a “double triple helix” to merge science, businessand policy with the aforementioned issues. A general consensus from the first forum was that we have the knowledge,
and now is the time to act.
The second EAT Stockholm Food Forum will take place
1-2 June 2015. Confirmed speakers include Prime Ministers
Stefan Löfven (Sweden) and Erna Solberg (Norway) in addition to Paul Bulcke, CEO of Nestle and Lee Howell, Managing
Director of the World Economic Forum.
For more information, go to www.eatforum.org

PHOTO: EAT Stockholm Food Forum

Artist and designer Ron Finley, a self-­proclaimed guerrilla gardener from
Los Angeles, urged the participants at the EAT Food Forum to go out and“Do epic shit,” a message that hit home among the audience.

He is co-chair of the EAT Advisory Board, which also includes Richard Horton (Editor in Chief, The Lancet), Dr. Julio
Frenk (Dean, Harvard School of Public Health), Professor
Brian Wansink (Director, Cornell University Food and BrandLab), Professor Anthony Costello (Co-Director, the UCL), Lee
Howell (Managing Director, World Economic Forum) andMichiel Bakker (Director, Global Food Services, Google Inc.).
Spearheading a new approach
The inaugural EAT forum took place in Stockholm, Sweden,
26-27 May 2014 and gathered leaders and experts from allover the world.
From H.R.H. The Prince of Wales to Pre­si­dent Bill Clinton
via a wide array of experts on nutrition, non-communicablediseases and sustainable business strategies, the message wasProfessor Walter Willett from Harvard School of Public Health is aninternational authority on nutrition. He presented perspectives on whatis needed for a healthy and sustainable diet.

Over the course of two days 2185 people contributedon ­social media, sending 8684 tweets with a combined reach of 5,606,745.
The issues raised in the tweets reflected the inter­disciplinary nature of those in the room and those­following the ­forum online. The most popular hashtags after #EATforum itself was #food, #health and#sustainability.

Original Tweets

anthonycostello @anthonycostello@PeterBakker Corporate socialresponsibility is dead.
You hav to completely transform your business forsustainability. #EATforum@Message Tweets

Total

%

1,877

21.61%

537

6.18%

Retweets

6,270

72.20%

Total Tweets

8,684

100.00%40

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

An urban-focused research network
Centre hosted Sweden’s first national gathering of urban researcherswith an interest in urban, natural capital, and ­sustainability issues
More than 30 of Sweden’s most prominent researchers on­urbanisation came together or two days in November 2014
to discuss research areas and initiate a nation-wide scientificnetwork.
Urban sustainable development is high on the international science-to-policy agenda, and in the last decade new centres for urban research have been established in Sweden. The
aim of the conference was to identify opportunities for future
research, and ensure that Sweden keeps its place amongst theworld-leading countries in urban research.
”We found that there are many interesting possibilities for
new collaborations and for learning from each other. This was
only the beginning of a conversation that will continue andwe are very happy that it has been initiated,” says Centre­researcher Erik Andersson, one of the conveners of the con­ference.
A follow-up conference will take place in the early summer of 2015.
photo Jerker Lokrantz/Azote

The Rockefeller programme on social innovation
Finishing up successful first year with a diverse group of system­entrepreneurs
The Rockefeller Foundation Global Fellowship Program on
Social Innovation brought together a diverse group of 18­system entrepreneurs, committed to integrating social innovation into their work and interested in addressing the root
causes of problems affecting poor or vulnerable populations
by transforming the systems we live in – political, economic,
legal, educational, environmental, and social. The programme
Photo: RF Bellagio Center

was designed by the Stockholm Resilience Centre and theWaterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience at the
University of Waterloo in Canada. The programme ran between May 2013 and February 2014. The fellows participatedin four intensive modules, each held in a different international
location over this period. Through a series of presentations,
small group exercises and site visits, fellows were introduced
to new perspectives and skills to apply to the challenges facing
their own organizations and networks.
”The goal of the programme was to support entrepreneurship aimed at not just helping systems improve and adapt, butinstead to fundamentally alter the systems that create problems
in the first place,” says Centre researcher Per Olsson who
helped design and run the programme. ”The fellows in thisfirst year of the programme have been able to integrate resilience into the ways they look at and solve problems; this is
an important part of transformation towards sustainability.”

41

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Education for sustainable development
Gathering educators, teachers and researchers to discuss education forsustainable development
Educators, teachers and researchers from all over Sweden
gathered at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in
Stockholm from 17 to 18 November 2014 for a two-day
conference on how to strengthen education for sustainable
development in Sweden.
The conference was organized by Stockholm Resilience
Photo H.Karlsson

Centre together with the Swedish Museum for Natural History and the Swedish International Centre of Education for
Sustainable Development (SWEDESD). The aim was to allow
participants to reflect on key competences and methods for
effective education for sustainability. Lecturers included
Wolfgang Brunner, Program Specialist at SWEDESD, as well
as Centre researchers Johan Rockström, Lisen Schultz and
Per Olsson.
The conference concluded with a discussion involving
members of the Swedish delegation to the UNESCO World
Conference on Education for Sustainable Development,
which took place in Nagoya a week before the conference inStockholm. The delegation presented the outcomes of theWorld Conference and the new Global Action Program (GAP)on Education for Sustainable Development. Discussions were
held on possible and plausible ways of implementing GAP,
and in doing so also improving the quality of the Swedish­educational system.

Opening act at the Baltic Sea Festival 2014
Using music and theatre to communicate research insights on seabirds
and the Baltic Sea
Photo Mattias Ahlm/Sveriges Radio

People from around the Baltic Sea come to Stockholm every year to enjoy world-­class music played
at the Baltic Sea Festival. The festival, launched in
2003, is a cooperation between Berwaldhallen (Swe­den), conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen (Fin­land) andthe Marinski Theatre (Russia).
The festival aims to promote environmental
leadership and bring people together to discuss
the challenging questions about the Baltic Sea, using music as a platform. The environmental issues
in the Baltic Sea can only be solved if all the countries work together.
Stockholms Resilience Centre, together with
the Långsjö theatre group, opened the festival in2014, in a performance playing with the idea ofgoing beyond boundaries, by breaking down borders between science, ­music and dance. The performance told the story of how Centre researchers
work with sea birds and how their research has
guided them towards important insights about the complex
interactions between humans and nature in the B­ altic Sea.
The performance is the result of a collaborative process

between the Centre and Långsjö theatre, where methods fromtheatre and other creative professions have been importantfor supporting and facilitating learning in the multidisciplinary research group working with the Baltic Sea at the Centre.

42

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Stockholm Seminars 2014
The Stockholm Seminars feature some of the most prominent experts on
global sustainability
The seminars are hosted by ­Albaeco,
Stockholm Resilience Centre, the Beijer
Institute of Ecological Economics, theInternational Biosphere­Geosphere
Programme (IGBP) and the Swedish
Secretariat for Environmental Earth
System Sciences (SSEESS).

31 January
Greg Ayers
Environmental observations as a basis
for environmental intelligence
13 March
Meryl J. Williams
What are the social and economic
benefits of Women’s empowerment infisheries and aquaculture?

21 March
Steve Evans
Where does industry fit into a sustainable future?
1 AprilStuart KininmonthReefs in peril: understanding the plightof the world’s coastal treasures
24 April
Han Quinli
The new research agenda of UNESCO’s
Man and the Biosphere Programme
15 September
Simon Levin
Obstacles and opportunities in environmental management

19 September
Gunther Pauli
Steering society towards sustainability
by designing new competitive businessmodels24 September
William F Laurance
Ecosystem decay of a fragmented
Amazonian rainforest
20 October
Xuemei Bai
Urban System Dynamic, Experiments,
and Sustainability Transition
15 December
George Sugihara
Correlation and Causation

Photo: J. Lokrantz/Azote43

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Internal seminars
In 2014 the Stockholm Resilience Centre internal seminars had a special
focus on resilience thinking and social sciences
The PhD course “Why bother with
Durkheim?” introduced participants toseveral classic social science perspectives on the collective dimensions ofcauses, outcomes and solutions to environmental problems. A blog accompanied the course and initiated vibrantdiscussions among the wider resilience
research community about the role ofsociological classics in contemporarysocial-ecological research.
“Slow talks” were introduced in theautumn to complement the speed talklunches and to replace the Resilience
Dialogues. The slow talks will provide
opportunities for deeper reflections on
new research questions, concepts,
methods and critique.

20 February
Max Weber – the interpreter of ­(human)natureWijnand Boonstra

27 November
Responding to critique
Garry D Peterson, Thomas Hahn, Lisen
Schultz, Magnus Nyström

27 FebruarySocial science and global environmental
changeWijnand Boonstra and Simon West

8th December
What are the key competences that
PhD students need to develop during
their time at Stockholm Resilience Centre in order to advance the field of sustainability science?
Lisen schultz, Jonas Hentati Sundblad,Andrew Merrie, Garry Petersen

Internal seminars 2014:23 January
Why bother with Durkheim? – using(classical) social science to understandthe social dynamics of social-ecologicalsystems
Wijnand Boonstra and Simon West

Critical Reflection Seminar Series
30 OctoberSocial-ecological systems, socionatureor something else? Conceptualising­society-environment dynamics
Andrea J. Nightingale – University ofGothenburg, Sweden

30 January
Karl Marx – the first ecological sociologist?
Wijnand Boonstra

Slow talks
10 November
Weber slowly – the relevance of Max
Weber (one of the classic thinkers in­sociology) for resilience thinking.
Wijnand Boonstra – Introduction
Maja Schlüter – Modelling Weber
Johan Enqvist – Social-ecological drivers
behind urban environmental movements
Simon West – Resilience thinker as­vocation?

13 February
Emile Durkheim – functionalist embarrassment or proud heritage of systems
thinking?
Simon West

Resilience dialogue
22nd April
Frontiers of Resilience Research –­Reflecting on the results from a Delphi
process
What key questions where identified?
Where is Stockholm Resilience Centre
located in this research landscape?

Open spaces
The Monday speed talk lunches havebeen running for one and a half years
and remain highly popular. The speed
talks are opportunities for any employee
at the Centre to use four minutes tobring up an issue. Each lunch session
consists of ten four minute speed talks.
The speed lunches enable staff and visitors to get an overview of what is goingon at the Centre and have also been aplatform for supporting each other, initiating research collaborations and developing new ideas.
The Brown Bag Lunch (BBL) seminars are mostly used to provide all employees a chance to meet with visiting
guests and discuss issues on the wider
sustainability research agenda. Stockholm Resilience Centre is spoiled with aflow of interesting guests from all over
the world. In 2014 there were 40 BBLs,
of which 35 were held by external
guests, covering questions on research,
policy, practice and culture.

44

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Stockholm Workshops in Sustainability Science
The Stockholm Workshops reflect the Stockholm Resilience Centre’s culture of collaboration. We gather interdisciplinary leading international
scholars and interdisciplinary teams of competence to address problems,
methods, issues, and challenges in sustainability science and biospherestewardship
The workshops involve leading international scholars and someare transdisciplinary in scope by engaging diverse interest
groups and stakeholders.
The workshops are organised by Centre researchers andthose reported here are held in Stockholm or in collaboration
with our partners in various parts of the world.
Fisheries workshop series, Stockholm and Gothenburg
The Department of Political science at Chalmers University
in Gothenburg has a long tradition of investigating marine
governance in the developing world and is working with
global data sets from the social sciences. The marine theme
has a tradition of investigating marine governance in social-­
ecological systems, and is increasingly working with global
data sets from the natural sciences (the seaaroundus database) within the Nereus programme. A set of workshops­explored the potential for collaboration between the Gothenburg and Stockholm based groups, with an ambition to produce joint papers and applications. Henrik Österblom from
Stockholm Resilience Centre and Sverker Jagers from Gothen­burg organised and convened the meetings.
The Baltic Seabird project
The Baltic Seabird project is investigating ecosystem change
in the Baltic Sea through the study of seabirds. Experts onseabird ecology from the Centre teamed up with experts on
animal movement behaviour (Lund University) and fisheriesscience (Swedish Agricultural Sciences) to collaborate arounddiverse data sets and outcomes from collaborative field activi­
ties. This will contribute to an increased understanding of thecomplex interactions in the Baltic Sea.
Natural Capital & Resilience Workshops: Frontiers in
Research, Policy and Practice.
Two workshops were held at the Royal Swedish Academy of
Sciences in February and October 2014 with the aim of integrating theories on natural capital and resilience thinking into
key decision context. Led by Gretchen Daily (Stanford University) and Belinda Reyers (The Council for Scientific andIndustrial Research, CSIR), the workshop gathered researchers
from the Stockholm Resilience Centre, the Programme on
Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS), the Southern African
Program on Ecosystem Change and Society (SAPECS) in­addition to colleagues from Lund, Cambridge, China, Colombia, and India. The Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg

Foundation has further provided funds for a strategic partner­
ship between Stanford University, Stockholm Resilience Centre
and the Beijer Institute to develop new tools, approaches, andinterdisciplinary innovation for natural capital and biospherestewardship.
Ocean Science meeting: Multiple drivers affecting
ecosystem function in estuarine and coastal waters
The aim of this session, which took place at the international
Ocean Science meeting in Honolulu, Hawaii, February 2014,
was to present the effects of multiple external drivers on ecosystem function and dynamics in estuarine and coastal waters.
The session helped improve the understanding of general andspecific ecosystem responses to the compound effects of­external drivers as well as describing the risk for potential­regime shifts or severe changes in water quality.
Manufacturing industries and global supply chainsfor sustainability
On 20 March, Stockholm Resilience Centre organized aworkshop with Dr. Steve Evans, Director of the Centre forIndustrial Sustainability at the University of Cambridge, andhis research group. The focus of the workshop was on how
manufacturing industries, global supply chains and the built
environment can contribute to the sustainability and resilience of social-ecological systems.
The Role of Change Labs in Sustainability Transformations
On 23 April, Stockholm Resilience Centre organized a workshop with Jake Dunagan, Institute for the Future, and Frances
Westley, University of Waterloo, on change labs as a model
for co-creation and their role in sustainability transformations. The discussions focused on research questions about
how such labs could 1) increase the transformative capacity
to sustainability, 2) provide organizational structure and innovation space for co-creation of knowledge together witha broad range of stakeholders, and 3) produce prototypesof social-ecological innovations that can help create a good
­Anthropocene.
Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS)
In early May 2014, PECS and Stockholm Resilience Centreorganized a PECS workshop in Montpellier, France. The work­shop, which gathered 30 researchers involved in a variety of45

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

PHOTO: Lars Wiklund

PECS projects and working groups, provided the participants
with much-needed time to collaborate on ongoing papers,
proposals and projects. Speed-talk sessions (in plenary) were
held throughout the workshop and there were opportunities
for updates. The workshop also provided an opportunity to
network with researchers from the Resilience Alliance Young
Scholars network.
Resilience Alliance Young Scholars
The Resilience Alliance Young Scholars (RAYS) is a broadlyinterdisciplinary group of early career scientists interested insocial-ecological systems and resilience thinking. Co-organizedby the Centre, RAYS hosted its biannual workshop in
Mourèze, France, 3-4 May 2014. The focus of the workshop
was to finalize a set of publications.
The Ocean Tipping Point project
In May 2014, a workshop was organised within the Ocean
Tipping point project. The workshop gathered researchers
from the Centre and the National Center for Ecological Ana­lysis and Synthesis (NCEAS) in Santa Barbara, California.
The purpose was to compare marine regime shifts in a social-­
ecological context and the reasons behind it. Nine common
questions were developed on the challenge of understanding
and managing social-ecological tipping-points and regime shifts.
The Baltic Health Index
In mid May 2014, Centre researcher Thorsten Blenckner cochaired a scientific workshop on the development of a Baltic
Health Index – a regional assessment of the state of the Baltic
Sea. The workshop gathered 30 experts, representing important stakeholders in the region. The workshop was a joint­initiative with the Ocean Health Index team led by Ben Halpern(California, US) and Baltic Ecosystem Adaptive Management(BEAM), together with the Stockholm University Baltic Sea

Centre and Stockholm Resilience Centre. The aim was tobuild a network of collaborators, provide training about the
Ocean Health Index, and to discuss the potential for a Baltic
Health Index.
Breaking the Silos: towards an integrative research
agenda on the health and sustainability dimensionsof food
Under the auspices of the EAT Initiative, of which Stockholm
Resilience Centre is a partner, a workshop was organized inlate May 2014 at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
The purpose was to bring together members of the EAT Initiative’s Advisory Board and leading scientists from the Centre
to discuss areas of collaborative research across EAT’s academic partner network, including Harvard, UCL, Cornell,
Universities of Oslo and Copenhagen. A White paper on thevarious dimensions of the research landscape concerning thefood-health-sustainability nexus was developed.
Emerging linkages between neuroscience, environmental behavior and policy
The BENN programme (Behavior, Economics and Nature
Network) hosted a workshop at the Royal Swedish Academyof Sciences 2-5 June 2014. It explored potential intersections
between neuroscience and behavioral economics that can­leverage insights for a better stewardship of our biosphere.
The workshop developed a position paper and a collaborative research project combining technologies of behavioral
neuroscience and behavioral economics to answer questions
regarding environmental decision-making. Researchers from
Karolinska Institutet interacted with researchers from ArizonaState University, Universities of Maine, Minnesota, Wageningen, Oslo, de los Andes, de la República Uruguay, Warsaw,
London School of Economics, the Beijer Institute and Stockholm Resilience Centre.

46

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Photo: M. Haeggman

Analyzing the dynamics of social-ecological systems:
Towards a typology of social-ecological interactions
In early June 2014 the ERC-funded project SES-LINK, whichis led by a range of Centre researchers, organised a workshop
designed to discuss a modelling framework that could be used
to analyse the evolutionary dynamics of social-ecological­systems as they arise from micro-level social-ecological interactions. It also looked at the development of a typology ofsocial-ecological interactions. The workshop involved experts
in modelling social-ecological systems from Arizona State
University, London School of Economics, University of Twente,
University of Osnabrück, and Manchester University.
Urban InVest
Centre researchers co-hosted in June 2014 a workshop in
Stockholm with the Natural Capital Project on developing anurban module within InVEST. InVEST is a suite of softwaremodels used to map and value the goods and services fromnature that sustain and fulfill human life. The toolset currently
includes sixteen distinct InVEST models suited to terrestrial,
freshwater, and marine ecosystems.
The Urban Sustainable Development Goals
In August 2014, Centre researchers co-hosted with the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) a workshop in London. The workshop focused on analyzing targets
and indicators specifically connected to urban development.

Social norms, multiple equilibria and the environment.
The 22nd annual Askö meeting, which took place in mid-September 2014, explored the concept of norms and the role ofnorms in the Anthropocene. Some 20 internationally ren­owned
researchers discussed whether social norms can help solve large-­
scale collective action problems like climate change. Based on
the discussion and insights from the workshop, the core writing team has drafted a science-policy piece on the topic.
Towards an ecosystem-based legal framework for theBaltic Sea
Stockholm Environmental Law and Policy Centre (SELPC)
and Baltic Ecosystem Adaptive Management (BEAM) hosteda transdisciplinary conference with special participation by
the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management(HaV) in October 2014. The conference covered state-of-theart research and management regarding a legal framework
for ecosystem-based management of the Baltic Sea. The conference was chaired by Centre board member Jonas Ebbesson
and Centre researcher Thorsten Blenckner.
Baltic Ecosystem Adaptive management (BEAM)­research areas
During a two-day workshop, which took place at the Centre
in mid-October 2014, new findings within the Baltic Ecosystem Adaptive Management (BEAM) research areas were synthesized. Areas such as nutrient enrichment, laws and manage­

47

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

ment, climate change, hazardous substances and ecosystem
functioning were put into a holistic overview. The workshop
provided an opportunity to supply input concerning possible
developments within the research areas, listen to inspiring
keynotes and mingle with colleagues. The workshop waschaired and organized by Centre researcher Thorsten Blenckner.
Policies for Resilience and Development
Stockholm Resilience Centre, the Beijer Institute, the Environmental Economics Unit, Gothenburg University and the
University of Dar es Salaam jointly organised a workshop in
Dar es Salaam 20-21 October 2014. The aim of the workshop
was to advance the content of research projects describedwithin a funding proposal to Sida for capacity building andresearch in developing countries. The workshop brought together research networks on environmental economics (EfD
initiative, SANDEE, LACEEP, EEPSEA) and ecosystem services
and resilience (SAPECS, SPACES), as well as key science-policy
partners from the CGIAR system (WLE, WorldFish) andICSU-ROA in Pretoria.
Spatial Fisheries Data Analysis
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Princeton University, the Kenya
Marine and Fisheries Research Institute and SLU - the Swedish
University of Agriculture - together hosted a workshop on
19 November 2014. Organized and led by Centre researcher
James Watson, the workshop developed a comparative analysis of marine ecosystem organization, with a focus on economic risk in fishing communities in the Baltic and US.

Seafood System Dynamics: pathways to sustainable
freshwater use in an era of uncertainty.
A group consisting of invited participants from Wageningen
University, Virginia University, WorldFish and Leiden University met at The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences on 25-26
November 2014. The aim of the workshop was to jointly­develop the knowledge foundation concerning how seafood
relates to freshwater consumption and scarcity, and to structure an output in the form of a global review paper.
The Urban Planet
Stockholm Resilience Centre, together with Urbanization and
Global Environmental Change, organized a Future Earth Fast
Track Initiative workshop in Taipei in November 2014. The
aim of the workshop was to scope content for a book on interdisciplinary approaches to the urban Anthropocene.
Emerging methods for empirical analyses of social-­
ecological systems
Participants from the Centre, the Swedish Agricultural University, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Princeton University, University of Amsterdam and NOAA met in December of 2014 in Ekskäret, Stockholm archipelago, in aworkshop focusing on methods for studying the dynamics ofcomplex adaptive systems. Discussions and analyses centredaround newly emerging time series methods designed for uncovering dynamics and causality in complex systems, such asocial-ecological systems.

Photo: M. Haeggman

48

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Transdisciplinary workshops
Societal transformations facing Climate Change: Thecase of a Low Carbon Society by 2050 in the Stockholm-Mälar Region
An international workshop was organized by Centre researchers
Stephan Barthel and Uno Svedin at the Sigtuna Foundation in
Sigtuna, Sweden, 20-21 February 2014, financed by the COM­
PLEX/WP4. Half of the 30 participants represented a deliberately mixed composition carefully selected to represent a wideand diverse group of stakeholders in the Stockholm-Mälar
region. The other half were scholars of a wide range of disciplinary backgrounds, including experts in transformation andresilience thinking. The aim was to increase understanding
about framings and values of stakeholders, and to explore
and co-produce new perspectives on a potential transition toa low carbon society in the Stockholm-­Mälar Region. The
workshop resulted in a scientific rapport as a deliverable to
the COMPLEX project.
Second Dialogue Seminar on Scaling up Finance for
Biodiversity
The Resilience and Development Programme (Swedbio) at
Stockholm Resilience Centre organized an international work­
shop in Quito, Ecuador in April 2014, focusing on financing
for biodiversity. The results from the workshop fed into the12th meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity in
the Republic of Korea, October 2014. The Dialogue Seminaris further described on page 31 in the Annual Report.
Social-Ecological Innovations in the Anthropocene
Stockholm Resilience Centre organized a workshop on 24
June in Stockholm to explore how to advance the researchand practice of sustainability transformations, social-ecological innovations and development for a just society within
planetary boundaries. As a myriad of technological and social
innovations are promoted to deal with sustainability challenges, the workshop asked the question of whether they contribute to the large-scale transformations that humanity needs
or if they reinforce current unsustainable trajectories. The
aim of the workshop was to bridge the gap between what ishappening at research institutes and how the fields of international development and social innovations are advancing.
The workshop convened a group of leading experts from theCentre, USAID, SIDA and other organizations across academic,
public and private sectors.
SPACES participatory workshops in Kenya and­Mozambique
The SPACES project (Sustainable Poverty Alleviation from
Coastal Ecosystem Services) aims to empirically test and under­
stand the complex relationship between coastal ecosystemservices and the wellbeing of the poor in coastal Kenya andMozambique. During 2014 the project organized a series ofparticipatory workshops using participatory models and­scenarios with stakeholders to understand the local social-­

ecological systems in terms of feedback dynamics, trade-offs
and opportunities for sustainable poverty alleviation. The work­
shops involved experts in poverty alleviation and sustainable
resource management operating in coastal Kenya and Mozam­bique and were arranged by Stockholm Resilience Centre andPECS researchers in collaboration with partners in Kenya,
Mozambique and the UK.
SPACES training workshop in Sweden
In November 2014 the SPACES project held a one and a half
day training workshop in scenario development methods at
the Stockholm Resilience Centre led by Mathijs van Vliet,
Wageningen University. Members from the SPACES projectfrom Kenya, Mozambique, the UK and researchers, students
and staff from the Centre and KTH as well as representatives
from other PECS projects such as SEEN attended the training. Theory and use of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping and exploratory narrative scenarios for an understanding of Social-Ecological Systems was introduced, giving the SPACES team achance to collectively learn and rehearse methods to be usedin participatory workshops in Kenya and Mozambique.
Resilience Assessment in Eskilstuna municipality­focusing on food supply
Stockholm Resilience Centre has a collaboration with Eskils­
tuna municipality since 2011 when two of the municipality’s
strategic environmental planners pursued an interest in exploring how resilience could be applied in the municipality.
In 3 workshops during 2014 a resilience assessment was carried out to investigate the food system in Eskilstuna municipality. The first workshop was held on 19 February and gathered local, regional and national actors to identify data gaps
and get a broader view of the system. In two following workshops the same actors met to conduct the assessment (9-10 Juneand 13 November). Over the whole process Centre reserchers
My Sellberg, Garry Peterson, Megan Mechan, Erik Andersson, Hanna Wetterstrand and Louise Hård af Segerstad contributed to the work.
Risk management and building resilience
In October 2015, a delegation from the Mexican Secretariatof the Interior and the Embassy of Mexico in Sweden visited
the Centre to learn more about resilience and governance inconnection with sustainable development, environmental
protection and climate change adaptation. The workshop­included among other things various presentations of the research and policy interface work on these topics by Stockholm
Resilience Centre and the Resilience and Development Programme (Swedbio) at the Centre, in addition to presentations
on civil protection and building resilience in Mexico by the
Mexican delegation and on climate change by the Swedish
Environmental Research Institute (IVL). The workshop wasorganized by Centre researcher Claudia Ituarte-Lima in collaboration with the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB).

49

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

PHOTO: M. Haeggman

50

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Education
Photo: L.Deutsch

Moving into the virtual environment
Adding a massive open online course to the education repertoire
The popular first-level course Världens Eko (Sustainable Perspectives on Development) broke all previous records in classsize – finishing the term with 180 registered students. The
regular impressive line-up still included Johan Rockströmand Hans Rosling, but photographer Mattias Klum and musician Timbuktu also joined us to give their perspectives onsustainability. The course also passed the Higher Education
Authority’s evaluation.
Tenfold increase in student numbers
The Centre usually teaches about 300 students a year, in2014 the first Centre MOOC (massive open online course)“Planetary Boundaries and Human Opportunities” hadabout 5600 enrolled students (read more on page 52). Plans
to launch an on-line undergraduate course at Stockholm­University are in development for 2015.
The MSc programme continues to run smoothly with anactive new group of first-years. The second-year Master students did their traineeships and field work in Sweden, Burkina Faso, China, Uruguay, Denmark, Ecuador, U.K., Norway,
Kenya, Malaysia & Indonesia.
Resilience Research School
There was important progress in the on-going developmentof the Centre’s PhD programme. To help students relate their
PhD project to both the Centre’s research framework and thelarge and complex questions of sustainability and stimulate
the culture of collaboration needed to become a skilled sustainability scientist the education team created the new com-pulsory PhD course “Introduction to Resilience Thinking andAnalysis.” Henrik Österblom and Magnus Nyström organized it in 2014 and the plan is to hold it every other year.
In addition to this, the Resilience Research School gave 7
courses. Wijnand Boonstra led the efforts this year to deepen
students’ understanding of social science. He developed andlead the course “Why read old Durkheim? Using classical social science to understand the social dynamics of social-ecological systems.” Focusing on sustainability and economy
Thomas Green, postdoctoral researcher, led “Ecosystem services and economic analysis: an introduction from an ecological economics perspective,“ attracting 18 students from other SU departments, KTH, SLU, Södertörn, Linköping,
Helsinki and Lodz.
In addition, a collaborative effort between the Beijer Institute of Economics and the Centre resulted in the summer school
course “Arctic Climate Change, Economy and Society andArctic Resilience Report (ACCESS-ARR).” Fifteen graduate
students deepened their understanding of the current status
and prospects for change in the Arctic under climate change.
2014 saw also the successful defence of six PhDs, two­licentiate, and 13 Master’s theses. Fanny von Heland graduated from the Centre’s Sustainability Science programme, andArvid Bergström, Yihun Dile and Martina Kadin from theprogramme Natural Resource Management. Two students in
the Centre’s Resilience Research School, Matilda Valman at
the Political Science Department and Lisa Segnestam at the
Department of Economic History also successfully defended
their theses.

51

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Master Theses 2014
Sustainable Enterprising programme
Nicola Björk, Opportunities and obstacles implementing animal welfare friendly
meat to the Swedish public catering sector
Social-ecological Resilience for
Sustainable Development programme
Margaret Berry, Slow food in Transition: A study of niche d­ evelopment in
Stockholm
Hildur Hardardottir, Volunteer motivations and long-term v­ iability of volunteer-based adaptive co-management: acase study of the Noosa biosphere reserve, South East Queensland, Australia
Dayana Hernandez, Understanding the
conducive space for social learning in
the context of flood risk management: acase study of the city of Cali, Colombia
Carolina Holmberg, How can traditional knowledge be mobilized in a­legitimate, credible, and salient way? –A comparative study of three approaches
to developing and applying indicators
for Aichi Target 18
Alba Juarez Bourke, Natural resource
management and participation in Doñana(SW Spain) - Elements of adaptive co-­management and potential for change
Johanna Källén, The functional importance of herbivores: ­Tying the knot between fish biomass, parrotfish feeding
and benthic structure on Kenyan coral
reefs

Catarina Larsson, The role of initial
ecosystem state for ­future resilience andecosystem outcome
Flor Luna Estrada, Transformation of
Urban Lake Governance in Bangalore
India: A comparison of civic initiatives
Shauna Mahajan, Who benefits and who
loses? Evaluating the impacts of community-based marine protected areas on
ecosystem services and human wellbeing
Britt Stikvoort, Thou shallt not sell nature – A study on how taboo trade-offs
affect our pro-environmental behaviour
Pau Torrents, Farmers’ participation inconservation of rural landscapes: A casestudy of the Menorca Biosphere Reserve(Spain)Darin Wahl, Exploring pathways totransformations in post-disaster-event
communities: a case study on the Mad
River Valley, Vermont, USA

PhD Theses 2014
Sustainability Science:Franciska von Heland, Reef Futures:
Exploring the dynamics of transformative change in marine social-ecologicalsystems
Natural Resource Management:
Arvid Bergsten, Spatial complexity andfit between ecology and management:
Making sense of patterns in fragmented
landscapes
Yihun Dile, Intensifying Agricultural­Water Management in the Tropics:
A cause of water shortage or a sourceof resilience?

Martina Kadin, Seabirds as food forthought: An integrative study on seabird ecology and ecosystem services inchanging marine systems
Resilience Research School:
Lisa Segnestam, Culture and Capacity:
Drought and Gender DifferentiatedVulnerability of Rural Poor in Nicaragua,
1970-2010. Department of Economic
History
Matilda Valman, Three faces of HELCOM – institution, organization, policy
producer. Department of Political­Science.

Licentiate Theses 2014
Maike Hamann, Mapping social-ecological systems and ­human well-being:
A spatial exploration of the links between people and the environment inSouth Africa
Johanna Yletyinen, Structural changes
in marine ecosystems – the applicationof novel network approaches to understand marine regime shifts

Previous MSc student­thesis work published2014
Enqvist, J., M. Tengo, O. Bodin. 2014.
Citizen networks in the Garden City:
Protecting urban ecosystems in rapid
urbanization. Landscape and Urban
Planning. 130: 24-35
Merrie, A., P. Olsson 2014. An innovation and agency perspective on theemergence and spread of Marine Spatial
Planning. Marine Policy, 44, 366-374

52

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

First ever MOOC at Stockholm Universitey
In 2014 Stockholm Resilience Centre gave a massive open online course
together with SDSNedu (Sustainable Development Solutions Network –Education), an initiative of the SDSN Association“Planetary Boundaries and Human Opportunities: The Quest
for Safe and Just Development on a Resilient Planet” was held
between 17 November 2014 and 2 February 2015. The course
was designed to help students explore and apply a range of
emerging concepts within sustainability science, including:the Anthropocene, planetary boundaries, the social-ecologicalsystems approach and resilience thinking.
After an agreement in the spring between the Centre and
SDSN, a core team at the Centre consisting of Lisa Deutsch,
Director of Studies, Jonas Torrens, Research Assistant with
the Planetary Boundaries Network and Andrew Merrie, Centre PhD student, joined forces to ensure that the content bestreflected the cutting edge of Centre science and teaching. In
the last week of August 2014, Centre researchers, the education team and the communications staff all worked closelywith the documentary film company kontentreal from New
York to film over 40 video lectures. What followed was anintensive three-month process of editing and combining thevideos with quizzes, homework assignments and activities topromote interaction and reflection among students.
The main instructor for the course was Centre Executive
Director Johan Rockström. Lisa Deutsch, Director of Studies
at the Centre, was Course Coordinator and one of the instructors. Other Centre researchers that contributed were SarahCornell, Garry Peterson, Carl Folke, Victor Galaz, Thomas
Elmqvist and Will Steffen. Kevin Noone also participatedthrough his long-term working relationship with the Centre.
Throughout the course, Professor Rockström, together
with his colleagues from the Stockholm Resilience Centre,
held live hangouts that enabled the students to ask questions

53

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Illustration: Jerker Lokrantz/Azote

about course content and the wider set of sustainable development issues. Kate Raworth contributed by leading the
hangout on ‘doughnut economics and planetary boundaries’
hosted by Sarah Cornell.
A total of 5600 students signed up to take the course, andover 15% of them received a course completion certificate,
this is double the average rate of completion for a MOOC,
which is 7% according to The Times, 2013.

What is a MOOC?
A MOOC is a massive, open, online course:
a course that is free of charge and open to
everyone with access to the internet.

PHOTO: Tad Fettig/kontentreal

54

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Appendix:
Finances2014 Total

113,7

MSEK

Stockholm University
27,7
Allocated fund from Stockholm University
18,0
Allocated External Formas funding via faculty	  6,1Accumulated surplus from Stockholm University	  3,6

MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK

MISTRA core grant*

18,7

MSEK

67,3
The Swedish Research Council	  5,7Formas14,1
Swedish Environmental Protection Agency	  2,0SIDA	 0,5
SIDA (Swedbio)
18,7
Futura	 1,7Schwartz	 1,3Nippon Foundation	  1,0Global Challenges Foundation	  1,5EU	 4,7
Swedish institute	  3,1NERC	  4,4Other	 8,6

MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK
MSEK

External grant total*Allocated grant from Mistra 15,8 MSEK plus accumulated surplus 0,1 MSEK55

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Centre publications
Books
Duit, A. (editor). 2014. State and Environment:
The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance. MIT Press.
Galaz, V. 2014. Global Environmental Governance, Technology and Politics: The Anthropocene Gap. Edgar Elgar Publishing.

Beeden, R., J. Maynard, J. Johnson, J. Dryden,
S. Kininmonth, P. Marshall. 2014. No-anchoringareas reduce coral damage in an effort to build­resilience in Keppel Bay, southern Great Barrier
Reef. Australasian Journal of Environmental
Management 21(3):311-319.

Rockström, J., M. Falkenmark, C. Folke,
M. Lannerstad, J. Barron, E. Enfors, L. Gordon,
J. Heinke, H. Hoff, C. Pahl-Wostl. 2014. Water
Resilience for Human Prosperity. Cambridge­University Press.

Beilin, R., R. Lindborg, M. Stenseke, H. M. Pereira,A. Llausas, E. Slätmo, Y. Cerqueira, L. Navarro,
P. Rodrigues, N. Reichelt, N. Munro, C. Queiroz.
2014. Analysing how drivers of agricultural land
abandonment affect biodiversity and culturallandscapes using case studies from Scandinavia,
Iberia and Oceania. Land Use Policy 36:60-72.

Articles:Abernethy, K.E., Ö. Bodin, P. Olsson, Z. Hilly,
A. Schwarz. 2014. Two steps forward, two steps
back: The role of innovation in transforming­towards community-based marine resource
manage­­ment in Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 28:309-321.

Bennett, E.M., S.R. Carpenter, L.J. Gordon,
N. Ramankutty, P. Balvanera, B. Campbell,
W. Cramer, J. Foley, C. Folke, L. Karlberg, J. Liu,
H. Lotze-Campen, N.D. Mueller, G.D. Peterson,
S. Polasky, J. Rockström, R.J. Scholes, and M.
­Spirenburg. 2014. Toward a more resilient agriculture. Solutions 5 (5):65-75.

Andersson, E., S. Barthel, S. Borgström, J. Colding,
T. Elmqvist, C. Folke, Å. Gren. 2014. Reconnecting cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of green
infrastructure and urban ecosystem services.
­Ambio 43(4):445-453.

Bergsten, A., D. Galafassi, Ö. Bodin. 2014. The
problem of spatial fit in social-ecological systems:
detecting mismatches between ecological connectivity and land management in an urban region.
Ecology and Society 19(4):6.

Andersson, E., J. Colding. 2014. Understanding
how built urban form influences biodiversity.
­Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13(2):221-226.

Blazquez-Cabrera, S., Ö. Bodin, S. Saura. 2014.
Indicators of the impacts of habitat loss on connectivity and related conservation priorities: Do
they change when habitat patches are defined at
different scales? Ecological Indicators 45:704-716.

Andersson, E., R. Lindborg. 2014. Species richn­ess
and assemblages in landscapes of different farming
intensity: Time to revise conservation strategies?
PLoS ONE 9(10):e109816.
Baird, J., R. Plummer, C. Haug, D. Huitema. 2014.
Learning effects of interactive decision-making
processes for climate change adaptation. Global
Environmental Change 27:51-63.
Baird, J., R. Plummer, S. Morris, S. Mitchell, K.
Rathwell. 2014. Enhancing source water protection and watershed management: Lessons fromthe case of the New Brunswick Water Classification Initiative. Canadian Water Resources Journal
39(1):49-62.
Baird, J., R. Plummer, K. Pickering. 2014. Priming
the governance system for climate change adapt­ation: The application of a social-ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology
and Society 19(1):3
Barrett, S., T.M. Lenton, A. Millner, A. Tavoni,S. Carpenter, J.M. Anderies, F.S. Chapin III, A.-S.
Crépin, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, C. Folke, V. Galaz, T.
Hughes, N. Kautsky, E.F. Lambin, R. Naylor, K.
Nyborg, S. Polasky, M. Scheffer, J. Wilen, A. Xepapadeas, A. de Zeeuw. 2014. Climate engineering
reconsidered. Nature Climate Change 4:527-529.

Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, M. Thyresson, A.-l. Golz,
M. Tengö. 2014. Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecologicalstructures and processes. Conservation Biology
28(5):1371-1379.
de Boer, M.K., H. Moor, B. Matthiessen, H. Hille­
brand, B.K. Eriksson. 2014. Dispersal restricts­local biomass but promotes the recovery of meta­
communities after temperature stress. Oikos
123(6):762-768.
Boonstra, W.J., F.W. de Boer. 2014. The historicaldynamics of social-ecological traps. Ambio 43(3):260-274.
Boyd, E., J. Ensor, V.C. Broto, S. Juhola. 2014.
­Environmentalities of urban climate governancein Maputo, Mozambique. Global Environmental
Change 26:140-151.

Cinner, J.E., T. Daw, C. Huchery, P. Thoya, A.
Wamu­kota, M. Cedras, C. Abunge. 2014 Winners
and losers in marine conservation: Fishers’ displacement and livelihood benefits from marine reserves. Society & Natural Resources 27(9):994-1005.
Coelho, M., S.J. Lade, S. Alberti, T. Gross, I.M.
Tolic. 2014. Fusion of protein aggregates facilitates
asymmetric damage segregation. PLoS Biology
12(6):e1001886.
Coenders-Gerrits, A.M.J., R.J. van der Ent, T.A.
Bogaard, L. Wang-Erlandsson, M. Hrachowitz,
H.H.G. Savenije. 2014. Uncertainties in transpiration estimates. Nature 506: E1–E2
Cross, A.D.P., J. Hentati-Sundberg, H. Österblom,
R.A.R. McGill, R.W. Furness. 2014. Isotopic analysis of island House Martins Delichon urbica indicates marine provenance of nutrients. Ibis 156(3):676-681.
Daewel, U., S.S. Hjollo, M. Huret, R. Ji, M. Maar,
S. Niiranen, M. Travers-Trolet, M.A. Peck, K.E.
van de Wolfshaar. 2014. Predation control of zooplankton dynamics: A review of observations andmodels. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71(2):254-271.
Daume, S., M. Albert, K. von Gadow. 2014. Forest monitoring and social media: Complementary
data sources for ecosystem surveillance? Forest
Ecology and Management 316:9-20.
de la Torres-Castro, M., G. Di Carlo, N.S. Jiddawi.
2014. Seagrass importance for a small-scale fisheryin the tropics: The need for seascape management.
Marine Pollution Bulletin 83: 398-407.
Dearing, J.A., R. Wang, K. Zhang, J.G. Dyke, H.
Haberl, M.S. Hossain, P.G. Langdon, T. Lenton,
K. Raworth, S. Brown, J. Carstensen, M.J. Cole,
S.E. Cornell, T.P. Dawson, C.P. Doncaster, F.
­Eigenbrod, M. Floerke, E. Jeffers, A.W. Mackay,
B. Nykvist, G.M. Poppy. 2014. Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change 28:227-238.
Dile, Y.T., R. Srinivasan. 2014. Evaluation of
CFSR climate data for hydrologic prediction indata-scarce watersheds: an application in the Blue
Nile River Basin. Journal of the American Water
Resources Association 50(5):1226-1241.

Brock, W., G. Engström, A. Xepapadeas. 2014.
Spatial climate-economic models in the design of
optimal climate policies across locations. European
Economic Review 69:78-103.

Donges, J.F., R.V. Donner, N. Marwan, S.F.M.
Breitenbach, K. Rehfeld, J. Kurths. 2014. Non­linear regime shifts in Holocene Asian monsoon
variability: Potential impacts on cultural change
and migratory patterns. Climate of the Past Discussions 10: 895-975.

Buehligen, F., P. Lindner, I. Fetzer, F. Stahl, T. Scheper, H. Harms, S. Mueller. 2014. Analysis of aging
in lager brewing yeast during serial repitching.
Journal of Biotechnology 187:60-70.

Downing, A.S., E. Van Nes, J. Balirwa, J. Beuving,
P. Bwathondi, L.J. Chapman, I.J.M. Cornelissen,
I.G. Cowx, K. Goudswaard, R.E. Hecky, J.H.
Janse, A. Janssen, L. Kaufman, M.A. Kishe-­

56

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Machumu, J. Kolding, W. Ligtvoet, D. Mbabazi,
M. Medard, O.C. Mkumbo, E. Mlaponi, A.T.
Munyaho, L.A.J. Nagelkerke, R. Ogutu-Ohwayo,
W.O. Ojwang, H.K. Peter, D. Schindler, O. Seehausen, D. Sharpe, G.M. Silsbe, L. Sitoki, R. Tumwebaze, D. Tweddle, K.E. Van de Wolfshaar, H. Van
Dijk, E. Van Donk, J.C. Van Rijssel, P.A.M. Van
Zwieten, J.H. Wanink, F. Witte, W.M. Mooij. 2014.
Coupled human and natural system dynamics as
key to the sustainability of Lake Victoria’s eco­system services. Ecology and Society 19(4): 31.

Frishkoff, L.O., D.S. Karp, L. K. M’Gonigle,
C.D. Mendenhall, J. Zook, C. Kremen, E.A. Hadly,
G.C. Daily. 2014. Loss of avian phylogenetic diversity in neotropical agricultural systems. Science345(6202): 1343-1346.

Downing, A.S., S. Hajdu, O. Hjerne, S.A. Otto,
T. Blenckner, U. Larsson, M. Winder. 2014.
Zooming in on size distribution patterns under­
lying species coexistence in Baltic Sea phyto­plankton. Ecology Letters 17(10) 1219-1227.

Gaertner, M., R. Biggs, M. Te Beest, C. Hui,
J. Molofsky, D.M. Richardson. 2014. Invasiveplants as drivers of regime shifts: Identifying
high-priority invaders that alter feedback relationships. Diversity & Distributions 20(7): 733-744.

Dupont, D., C. Waldner, L. Bharadwaj, R. Plummer, B. Carter, K. Cave, R. Zagozewski. 2014.
Drinking water management: Health risk perceptions and choices in First Nations and Non-First
Nations communities in Canada. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health 11(6): 5889-5903.

Garg, K., S. Wani, J. Barron, L. Karlberg, J. Rockström. 2014. Reply to comment on ‘Up-scaling
potential impacts on water flows from agricultural
water interventions: Opportunities and trade-offs
in the Osman Sagar catchment, Musi sub-basin,
India. Hydrological Processes 28(8): 3352-3355.

Edgar, G.J., R.D. Stuart-Smith, T.J. Willis, S. Kininmonth, S.C. Baker, S. Banks, N.S. Barrett, M.A.
Becerro, A.T.F. Bernard, J. Berkhout, C.D. Buxton,
S.J. Campbell, A.T. Cooper, M. Davey, S. Edgar,
G. Foersterra, D.E. Galvan, A.J. Irigoyen, D.J.
Kushner, R. Moura, P.E. Parnell, N.T. Shears,
G. Soler, E.M.A. Strain, R.J. Thomson. 2014.
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine
protected areas with five key features. Nature
506(7487):216.
Elmqvist, T. 2014. Urban resilience thinking. Solutions 5(5): 26-30
Enqvist, J., M. Tengö, Ö. Bodin. 2014. Citizen networks in the Garden City: Protecting urban ecosystems in rapid urbanization. Landscape and­Urban Planning 130: 24-35.

Fröcklin, S., M. de la Torre-Castro, E. Håkans­son, A. Carlsson, M. Magnusson, N.S. Jiddawi.
2014. Towards improved management of tropicalinvertebrate fisheries: Including time series andgender. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91161.

Gerst, M.D., P.D. Raskin, J. Rockström. 2014.
Contours of a resilient global future. Sustainability
6(1): 123-135.
Gharasoo, M., F. Centler, I. Fetzer, M. Thullner.
2014. How the chemotactic characteristics of bacteria can determine their population patterns. Soil
Biology and Biochemistry 69: 346-358.
Giusti, M., S. Barthel, L. Marcus. 2014. Natureroutines and affinity with the biosphere: A casestudy of preschool children in Stockholm. Child­ren, Youth and Environments 24(3), 16-42.
Gould, R.K., N.M. Ardoin, U. Woodside, T. Satter­field, N. Hannahs, G.C. Daily. 2014 The forest has
a story: Cultural ecosystem services in Kona,­Hawai’i. Ecology and Society 19(3), 55.

Häyhä, T., P.P. Franzese. 2014. Ecosystem services
assessment: A review under an ecological-economic
and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling289: 124-132.
von Heland, F., J. Clifton, P. Olsson. 2014. Improving stewardship of marine resources: Linking
strategy to opportunity. Sustainability 6(7): 44704496.
von Heland, F., B.I. Crona, P. Fidelman. 2014.
Mediating science and action across multiple
boundaries in the Coral Triangle. Global Environmental Change 29: 53-64
von Heland, J., C. Folke. 2014. A social contract
with the ancestors: Culture and ecosystem services
in southern Madagascar. Global Environmental
Change 24: 251-264.
Hentati-Sundberg, J., J. Hjelm. 2014. Can fisheries
management be quantified? Marine Policy 48:
18-20.
Hentati-Sundberg, J., J. Hjelm, H. Österblom.
2014. Does fisheries management incentivize
non-compliance? Estimated misreporting in the
Swedish Baltic Sea pelagic fishery based on commercial fishing effort. ICES Journal of Marine­Science 71(7): 1846-1853.
Hinkel, J., P.W.G. Bots, M. Schlüter. 2014. Enhancing the Ostrom social-ecological systemframe­work through formalization. Ecology andSociety 19(3): 51.
Ituarte-Lima, C., C.L. McDermott, M. Mulyani.
2014. Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD +: The case of Indonesia.
­Environmental Science and Policy 44: 291-300.

Eriksson, M.G., L.J. Gordon, J.L. Kuylenstierna.
2014. Cross-sectoral approaches help build water
resilienc: Reflections. Aquatic Procedia 2: 42-47.

Graham, N.A.J., J.E. Cinner, A.V. Norström, M.
Nyström. 2014. Coral reefs as novel ecosystems:
Embracing new futures. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7: 9-14.

Johannessen, Å., A. Rosemarin, F. Thomalla,
Å. Gerger Swartling, T. A. Stenström, G. Vulturius.
2014. Strategies for building resilience to hazards
in water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) systems:
The role of public private partnerships. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 10(partA): 102-115.

Falkenmark, M., A. Jägerskog, K. Schneider. 2014.
Overcoming the land-water disconnect in water-­scarce regions: Time for IWRM to go contemporary. International Journal of Water Resources
Development 30(3): 391-408.

Griggs, D., M. Stafford Smith, J. Rockström,
M. C. Öhman, O. Gaffney, G. Glaser, N. Kanie,
I. ­Noble, W. Steffen, P. Shyamsundar. 2014. An­integrated framework for sustainable development goals. Ecology and Society 19(4): 49.

Jongerden, J., P. Swagemakers, S. Barthel. 2014.
Connective storylines: A relational approach toinitiatives in food provisioning and green infrastructures. Spanish Journal of Rural Development
5: 7-18.

Felton, A., M. Lindbladh, J. Elmberg, A.M. Felton,
E. Andersson, C.H. Sekercioglu, Y. Collingham,
B. Huntley. 2014. Projecting impacts of anthropogenic climatic change on the bird communities ofsouthern Swedish spruce monocultures: Will the
species poor get poorer? Ornis Fennica 91(1): 1-13.

Haase, D., N. Frantzeskaki, T. Elmqvist. 2014.
Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: Practicalapplications and governance implications. Ambio
43(4-SI): 407-412.

Jönsson, A.M., Å. Gerger Swartling. 2014. Reflections on science–stakeholder interactions in climate change adaptation research within Swedish
forestry. Society & Natural Resources 27(11):1130-1144.

Fidelman, P., L.S. Evans, S. Foale, C. Weible,
F. von Heland, D. Elgin. 2014. Coalition cohesion
for regional marine governance: A stakeholder
analysis of the Coral Triangle Initiative. Ocean
and Coastal Management 95: 117-128.

Haase, D., N. Larondelle, E. Andersson, M. Artmann, S. Borgström, J. Breuste, E. Gomez-Bagge­
thun, Å. Gren, Z. Hamstead, R. Hansen, P. Kremer,
J. Langemeyer, E.L. Rall, T. McPhearson, S. Pauleit, S. Qureshi, N. Schwarz, A. Voigt, D. Wurster,
T. Elmqvist 2014. A quantitative review of urban
ecosystem service assessments: Concepts, models
and implementation. Ambio 43, 413-433.

Keskitalo, E.C.H., J. Baird, E.L. Ambjörnsson,
R. Plummer. 2014. Social network analysis ofmulti-level linkages: A Swedish case study on
northern forest-based sectors. Ambio 43(6):745-758.

57

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Keys, P.W., E.A. Barnes, R.J. van der Ent, L.J. Gordon. 2014. Variability of moisture recycling using
a precipitationshed framework. Hydrology and
Earth System Sciences 18(10): 3937-3950.
Kininmonth, S., S. Lemm, C. Malone, T. Hatley.
2014. Spatial vulnerability assessment of anchor
damage within the Great Barrier Reef World
Heri­tage Area, Australia. Ocean and Coastal
Management 100: 20-31.
Krohn, S., S. Boehm, C. Engelmann, J. Hartmann,
A. Brodzinski, A. Chatzinotas, K. Zeller, D. Pry­
werek, I. Fetzer, T. Berg. 2014. Application ofqualitative and quantitative real-time PCR, direct
sequencing, and terminal restriction fragment
length polymorphism analysis for detection andidentification of polymicrobial 16S rRNA genes
in ascites. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 52(5):1754-1757.
Leadley, P., V. Proenca, J. Fernandez-Manjarres,
H. M. Pereira, R. Alkemade, R. Biggs, E. Bruley,
W. Cheung, D. Cooper, J. Figueiredo, E. Gilman,
S. Guenette, G. Hurtt, C. Mbow, T. Oberdorff,
C. Revenga, J. P. W. Scharlemann, R. Scholes,
M.S. Smith, U.R. Sumaila, M. Walpole. 2014. Interacting regional-scale regime shifts for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 64(8):665-679.
Lindkvist, E., J. Norberg. 2014. Modeling experiential learning: The challenges posed by threshold
dynamics for sustainable renewable resource
management. Ecological Economics 104: 107-118.
Mace, G.M., B. Reyers, R. Alkemade, R. Biggs, F.
Chapin, I. Stuart, S.E. Cornell, S. Diaz, S. Jennings,
P. Leadley, P.J. Mumby, A. Purvis, R.J. Scholes,
A.W.R. Seddon, M. Solan, W. Steffen, G. Woodward. 2014. Approaches to defining a planetary
boundary for biodiversity. Global Environmental
Change 28: 289-297.
Marin, A., S. Gelcich, J.-C.Castilla. 2014. Ecosystem services and abrupt transformations in acoastal wetland social-ecological system: Tubul-­
Raqui after the 2010 earthquake in Chile. Ecology
and Society 19(1): 22.
Matsue, N., T. Daw, L. Garrett. 2014. Fish traderson the Kenyan Coast: Livelihoods, bargaining
power, and participation in management. Coastal
Management 42(6): 531-554.
Meier, H.E.M., H.C. Andersson, B. Arheimer, C.
Donnelly, K. Eilola, B. G. Gustafsson, L. Kotwicki,
T.-S. Neset, S. Niiranen, J. Piwowarczyk, O.P.
Savchuk, F. Schenk, J.M. Weslawski, E. Zorita.
2014. Ensemble modeling of the Baltic Sea ecosystem to provide scenarios for management. Ambio
43(1): 37-48.
Mendenhall, C.D., D.S. Karp, C.F.J. Meyer, E.A.
Hadly, G.C. Daily. 2014. Predicting biodiversity
change and averting collapse in agricultural landscapes. Nature 509(7499): 213-217.

Merrie, A., D.C. Dunn, M. Metian, A.M. Boustany,
Y. Takei, A.O. Elferink, Y. Ota, V. Christensen,
P.N. Halpin, H. Österblom. 2014. An ocean ofsur­prises: Trends in human use, unexpected dyna­
mics and governance challenges in areas beyond
national jurisdiction. Global Environmental
Change 27: 19-31.
Merrie, A., P. Olsson. 2014. An innovation andagency perspective on the emergence and spreadof Marine Spatial Planning. Marine Policy 44:366-374.
Metian, M., S. Pouil, A. Boustany, M. Troell. 2014.
Farming of bluefin tuna: Reconsidering global­estimates and sustainability concerns. Reviews in
Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 22(3): 184-192.
Milner-Gulland, E.J., J.A. Mcgregor, M. Agarwala,
G. Atkinson, P. Bevan, T. Clements, T. Daw, K.
Homewood, N. Kumpel, J. Lewis, S. Mourato,
B.P. Fry, M. Redshaw, J.M. Rowcliffe, S. Suon, G.
Wallace, H. Washington, D. Wilkie. 2014. Account­ing for the impact of conservation on ­human well-­being. Conservation Biology 28(5): 1160-1166.
Moellmann, C., M. Lindegren, T. Blenckner, L.
Bergström, M. Casini, R. Diekmann, J. Flinkman,
B. Muller-Karulis, S. Neuenfeldt, J. O. Schmidt,
M. Tomczak, R. Voss, A. Gårdmark. 2014. Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management:
From single-species to integrated ecosystemassess­ment and advice for Baltic Sea fish stocks.
ICES Journal of Marine Science 71(5): 1187-1197.
Moore, M.-L., O. Tjornbo, E. Enfors, C. Knapp,
J. Hodbod, J. A. Baggio, A. Norström, P. Olsson,
D. Biggs. 2014. Studying the complexity of change:
Toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations.
Ecology and Society 19(4): 54.
Moore, M.-L., S. von der Porten, R. Plummer,
O. Brandes, J. Baird. 2014. Water policy reform
and innovation: A systematic review. Environmental Science and Policy 38: 263-271.
Müller, B., S. Balbi, C.M. Buchmann, L. de Sousa,
G. Dressler, J. Groeneveld, C.J. Klassert, Q.B. Le,
J.D.A. Millington, H. Nolzen, D.C. Parker, J.G.
Polhill, M. Schlüter, J. Schulze, N. Schwarz, Z.
Sun, P. Taillandier, H. Weise. 2014. Standardised
and transparent model descriptions for agentbased models: Current status and prospects. Environmental Modelling & Software 55: 156-163.
Nash, K.L., C.R. Allen, D.G. Angeler, C. Barichievy,
T. Eason, A.S. Garmestani, N.A.J. Graham,
D. Granholm, M. Knutson, R.J. Nelson, M.
Nyström, C.A. Stow, S.M. Sundström. 2014. Discontinuities, cross-scale patterns, and the organization of ecosystems. Ecology 95(3): 654-667.
Nash, K.L., C.R. Allen, C. Barichievy, M. Nyström,
S. Sundström, N.A.J. Graham. 2014. Habitat
structure and body size distributions: Cross-ecosystem comparison for taxa with determinate andindeterminate growth. Oikos 123(8): 971-983.

Nordlund Mtwana, L., M. de la Torre-Castro, J.
Erlandsson, C. Conand, N. Muthiga, N. Jiddawi,
M. Gullström. 2014. Intertidal zone managementin the Western Indian Ocean: Assessing current
status and future possibilities using expert opinions. Ambio 43(8): 1006-1019
Norström, A.V., A. Dannenberg, G. McCarney,
M. Milkoreit, F. Diekert, G. Engström, R. Fishman, J. Gars, E. Kyriakopoolou, V. Manoussi,
K. Meng, M. Metian, M. Sanctuary, M. Schlüter,M. Schoon, L. Schultz, M. Sjöstedt. 2014. Three
necessary conditions for establishing effective Sustainable Development Goals in the Anthropocene.
Ecology and Society 19(3): 8.
Nykvist, B. 2014. Does social learning lead to better natural resource management? A case study ofthe modern farming community of practice inSweden. Society & Natural Resources 27(4): 436450.
Nykvist, B., J. von Heland. 2014. Social-ecologicalmemory as a source of general and specified resilience. Ecology and Society 19(2): 47.
O’Farrill, G., K.G. Schampaert, B. Rayfield, Ö.
Bodin, S. Calme, R. Sengupta, A. Gonzalez. 2014.
The potential connectivity of waterhole networks
and the effectiveness of a protected area undervarious drought scenarios. PLoS ONE 9(5):e95049.
Olsson, P., V. Galaz, W.J. Boonstra. 2014. Sustainability transformations: A resilience perspective.
Ecology and Society 19(4): 1.
Österblom, H. 2014. Catching up on fisheriescrime. Conservation Biology 28(3): 877-879.
Otto, S.A., R. Diekmann, J. Flinkman, G. Kornilovs, C. Möllmann. 2014. Habitat heterogeneity
determines climate impact on zooplankton community structure and dynamics. PLoS ONE 9(3):e90875.
Otto, S.A., G. Kornilovs, M. Llope, C. Möllmann.
2014. Interactions among density, climate, andfood web effects determine long-term life cycle
dynamics of a key copepod. Marine Ecology
Progress Series 498(73): U408.
Ouedraogo I., J. Runge, J. Eisenberg, J. Barron,
S. Sawadogo-Kaboré. 2014. The re-greening of
the Sahel: Natural cyclicity or human-inducedchange? Land 3(3):1075-1090
Pauly, D., D. Belhabib, R. Blomeyer, W.W.W.L.
Cheung, A.M. Cisneros-Montemayor, D. Copeland, S. Harper, V.W.Y. Lam, Y. Mai, F. Le Manach,
H. Österblom, K.M. Mok, L. van der Meer, A.
Sanz, S. Shon, U.R. Sumaila, W. Swartz, R. Watson, Y. Zhai, D. Zeller. 2014. China’s distant-water fisheries in the 21st century. Fish and Fisheries
15(3): 474-488.
Pinnegar, J.K., M.T. Tomczak, J.S. Link. 2014.
How to determine the likely indirect food-web

58

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

consequences of a newly introduced non-native
species: A worked example. Ecological Modelling272, 379-387.
Queiroz, C., R. Beilin, C. Folke, R. Lindborg.
2014. Farmland abandonment: Threat or opportunity for biodiversity conservation? A global review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
12(5): 288-296.
Rist, L., A. Felton, M. Nyström, M. Troell,
R.A. Sponseller, J. Bengtsson, H. Österblom, R.
Lindborg, P. Tidåker, D.G. Angeler, R. Milestad,J. Moen. 2014. Applying resilience thinking to
production ecosystems. Ecosphere 5(6): 73.
Rockström, J., M. Falkenmark, T. Allan, C. Folke,
L. Gordon, A. Jägerskog, M. Kummu, M. Lannerstad, M. Meybeck, D. Molden, S. Postel, H. H. G.
Savenije, U. Svedin, A. Turton, O. Varis. 2014. The
unfolding water drama in the Anthropocene: Towards a resilience-based perspective on water for
global sustainability. Ecohydrology 7(5): 1249-1261.
Sale, P.F., T. Agardy, C.H. Ainsworth, B.E. Feist,
J.D. Bell, P. Christie, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, P.J.
Mumby, D.A. Feary, M.I. Saunders, T.M. Daw,
S.J. Foale, P.S. Levin, K.C. Lindeman, K. Lorenzen,
R.S. Pomeroy, E.H. Allison, R.H. Bradbury,
J. Corrin, A.J. Edwards, D.O. Obura, Y.J. Sadovyde Mitcheson, M.A. Samoilys, C.R.C. Sheppard.
2014. Transforming management of tropicalcoastal seas to cope with challenges of the 21st
century. Marine Pollution Bulletin 85(1): 8-23.
Sandström, A., B. Crona, Ö. Bodin. 2014. Legitimacy in co-management: The impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governancestrategies. Environmental Policy and Governance24(1): 60-76.

Stadelmann, M., Å. Persson, I. Ratajczak-Juszko,
A. Michaelowa. 2014. Answer of the authors to
the response of the Adaptation Fund Board Secretariat to the article ‘Equity and cost-effectivenessof multilateral adaptation finance: are they friends
or foes?’’ International Environmental Agreements 14(2): 125-127.
Stuart-Smith, R., J. Lefcheck, A. Bates, S. Baker,
R. Thomson, J. Stuart-Smith, N. Hill, E. Duffy, S.
Kininmonth, L. Airoldi, M. Becerro, S. Campbell,
T. Dawson, S. Navarrete, G. Soler, E. Strain,
T. Willis, G. Edgar. 2014. The potential of traitbased approaches to contribute to marine conservation. Marine Policy 51: 148-150
Sutherland, W., Gardner, T., Haider, J., Dicks,
L. 2013. How can local and traditional knowledge
be effectively incorporated into international assessments? Oryx 48(1): 1-2.
Sutherland, W.J., R. Aveling, T.M. Brooks,
M. Clout, L.V. Dicks, L. Fellman, E. Fleishman,
D.W. Gibbons, B. Keim, F. Lickorish, K.A. Monk,
D. Mortimer, L.S. Peck, J. Pretty, J. Rockström,
J.P. Rodriguez, R.K. Smith, M.D. Spalding,
F.H. Tonneijck, A.R. Watkinson. 2014. A horizon
scan of global conservation issues for 2014.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(1): 15-22.
Svensson, F., J. Norberg, P. Snoeijs. 2014. Diatom
cell size, coloniality and motility: Trade-offs between temperature, salinity and nutrient supply
with climate change. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109993.

Saura, S., Ö. Bodin, M.-J. Fortin. 2014. Steppingstones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks.
Journal of Applied Ecology 51(1): 171-182.

Takeuchi, K., T. Elmqvist, M. Hatakeyama, J. Kauff­man, N. Turner, D. Zhou. 2014. Using sustainability
science to analyse social-ecological restoration in
NE Japan after the great earthquake and tsunami
of 2011. Sustainability Science 9(4): 513-526.
Tengö, M., E.S. Brondizio, T. Elmqvist, P. Malmer,
M. Spierenburg. 2014. Connecting diverse know­
ledge systems for enhanced ecosystem governance:
The multiple evidence base approach. Ambio
43(5): 579-591.

Schewenius, M., T. McPhearson, T. Elmqvist. 2014.
Opportunities for increasing resilience and sustainability of urban social-ecological systems: Insights from the URBES and the Cities and Biodiversity Outlook Projects. Ambio 43(4): 434-444.

Troell, M., M. Metian, M. Beveridge, M. Verdegem,
L. Deutsch. 2014. Comment on ‘Water footprintof marine protein consumption-aquaculture’s linkto agriculture’. Environmental Research Letters
9(10): 109001

Schlüter, M., J. Hinkel, P.W.G. Bots, R. Arlinghaus.
2014. Application of the SES Framework for­model-based analysis of the dynamics of social-­
ecological systems. Ecology and Society 19(1).

Troell, M., R.L. Naylor, M. Metian, M. Beveridge,
P.H. Tyedmers, C. Folke, K.J. Arrow, S. Barrett,
A.-S. Crepin, P.R. Ehrlich, Å. Gren, N. Kautsky,
S.A. Levin, K. Nyborg, H. Österblom, S. Polasky,
M. Scheffer, B.H. Walker, T. Xepapadeas, A. de
Zeeuw. 2014. Does aquaculture add resilience tothe global food system? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States ofAmerica 111(37): 13257-13263.

Stöhr, C., C. Lundholm, B. Crona, I. Chabay.
2014. Stakeholder participation and sustainablefisheries: An integrative framework for assessing
adaptive comanagement processes. Ecology andSociety 19(3): 14.
Stadelmann, M., Å. Persson, I. Ratajczak-Juszko,
A. Michaelowa. 2014. Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: Are theyfriends or foes? International Environmental
Agreements 14(2): 101-120.

Tulbure, M.G., S. Kininmonth, M. Broich. 2014.
Spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water networks across a global biodiversity hotspot-implications for conservation. Environmental Research
Letters 9(11): 114012.

van der Ent, R.J., L. Wang-Erlandsson, P.W. Keys,
H.H.G. Savenije. 2014. Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycl
- Part 2: Moisture recycling. Earth System Dyna­
mics Discussions 5(2): 471-489
Varjopuro, R, E. Andrulewicz, T. Blenckner,
T. Dolch, A-S. Heiskanen, M. Pihlajamäki,
U. S. Brandt, M. Valman, K. Gee, T. Potts, I. Psuty.
2014. Coping with persistent environmental problems: systemic delays in reducing eutrophicationof the Baltic Sea. Ecology and Society 19(4): 48.
Wamukota, A., T.D. Brewer, B. Crona. 2014. Market integration and its relation to income distribution and inequality among fishers and traders:
The case of two small-scale Kenyan reef fisheries.
Marine Policy 48: 93-101.
Wang-Erlandsson, L., R.J. van der Ent, L.J. Gordon, H.H.G. Savenije. 2014. Contrasting roles ofinterception and transpiration in the hydrologicalcycle - Part 1: Temporal characteristics over land.
Earth System Dynamics 5(2): 441-469
Zemp, D.C., C.-F. Schleussner, H.M.J. Barbosa,
R.J. Van der Ent, J.F. Donges, J. Heinke, G. Sampaio, A. Rammig. 2014. On the importance of
cascading moisture recycling in South America.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14: 1333713359.
Zemp, D. C., M. Wiedermann, J. Kurths, A. Rammig, J. F. Donges. 2014. Node-weighted measuresfor complex networks with directed and weighted
edges for studying continental moisture recycling.
Europhysics Letters 107(5): 58005.
Journal articles online 2014 official­publications year 2015
Andersson, E., T. McPhearson, P. Kremer,
E. Gomez-­Baggethun, D. Haase, M. Tuvendal,
D. Wurster. Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units. Ecosystem Services
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001
Andersson, E., B. Nykvist, R. Malinga, F. Jarmillo,
R. Lindborg. A social-ecological analysis of ecosystem services in large and small scale farming
systems. Ambio doi 10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y
Andersson, E., M. Tengö, P. Kremer, T. McPhearson. Cultural ecosystem services as a platform forworking towards urban sustainability. Ecosystem
Services doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
Boonstra, W.J., J. Hentati-Sundberg. Classifying
fishers’ behaviour: An invitation to fishing styles.
Fish and Fisheries doi:10.1111/faf.12092
Boonstra, W.J., Tong Thi Hai Hanh. 2014. Adaptation to climate change as social-ecological trap:
A case study of fishing and aquaculture in the
Tam Giang Lagoon, Vietnam. Environment,­Development and Sustainability doi 10.1007/
s10668-014-9612-z

59

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Boonstra, W.J., H. Österblom. 2014. A chain offools: Or, why is it so hard to stop overfishing.
Maritime Studies doi 10.1186/s40152-014-0015-4
Chaigneau, T., T.M. Daw. Individual and village-­level effects on community support for Marine
Protected Areas (MPAs) in the Philippines. Marine
Policy doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.007
Conversi, A., V. Dakos, A. Gårdmark, S. Ling,
C. Folke, P. Mumby, C. Greene, M. Edwards, T.
Blenckner, M. Casini, A. Pershing, C. Möllmann.
A holistic view of marine regime shifts that spans
multiple ecosystems and stressors. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society London, Biological Sciences doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0279.

Mikulcak, F., L.J. Haider, D.J. Abson, J. Newig,
J. Fischer. Applying a capitals approach to understand rural development traps: A case study frompost-socialist Romania. Land Use Policy doi:
10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.024

Ebbesson, J., C. Folke. 2014. Matching scales oflaw with social-ecological contexts to promote resilience. In Garmestani, A.S., C.R. Allen, eds. Social-Ecological Resilience and Law. Columbia University Press. pp. 265-292.

Möllman, C., C. Folke, M. Edwards, A. Conversi.
Marine regime shifts around the globe: Theory,
drivers and impacts. Philosophical Transactions of
the Royal Society London, Biological Sciencesdoi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0260.

Hahn, T. 2014. Green Economy, economic growthand sustainable development. In Palmer, H. ed.
Access to Resources: An Urban Agenda. AADR
Art Architecture Design Research. pp. 338-357

Österblom, H., C. Folke. Globalization, marine
regime shifts and the Soviet Union. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society London, Biological Sciences. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0278.

Defeo, O., M. Castrejón, R. Pérez-Castañeda,J.-C. Castilla, N.L. Gutiérrez, T. Essington, C. Folke.
Co-management in Latin American small-scale
shellfisheries: Assessment from long-term casestudies. Fish and Fisheries doi: 10.1111/faf.12101

Queiroz, C., M. Meacham, K. Nigell, E. Andersson, A. Norström, J. Norberg, G. Peterson. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct
types of multi-functionality within a Swedish land­
scape. Ambio doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0

Feldhoff, J.H., S. Lange, J. Volkholz, J.F. Donges,
J. Kurths, and F.-W. Gerstengarbe. Complex networks for climate model evaluation with application to statistical vs. dynamical modeling of SouthAmerican climate. Climate Dynamics doi:
10.1007/s00382

Rocha, J., J. Yletyinen, R. Biggs, T. Blenckner,
G. Peterson. Marine regime shifts: Drivers and impacts on ecosystems services. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Biological
Sciences doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0273.

Galaz, V., H. Österblom, Ö. Bodin, B. Crona.
Global networks and global change-induced tipping points. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics doi:10.1007/
s10784-014-9253-6
Garavito-Bermúdez, D., C. Lundholm, B.I. Crona.
Linking a conceptual framework on systems
thinking with experiential knowledge. Environmental Education Research doi:10.1080/1350462
2.2014.936307.
Hentati-Sundberg, J., J. Hjelm, W.J. Boonstra,
H. Österblom. Management forcing increased
specialization in a fishery system. Ecosystems
doi:10.1007/s10021-014-9811-3
Jouffray, J.-B., M. Nyström, A.V. Norström,
I.D. Williams, L.M. Wedding, J.N. Kittinger, G.J.
Williams. Identifying multiple coral reef regimes
and their drivers across the Hawaiian archipelago.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
London, Biological Sciences doi: 10.1098/
rstb.2013.0268
Karpouzoglou, T., Barron, J. A global and regional
perspective of rainwater harvesting in sub-SaharanAfrica’s rainfed farming systems. Physics andChemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C. doi:
10.1016/j.pce.2014.09.009
McPhearson, T., E. Andersson, T. Elmqvist,
N. Frantzeskaki. Urban resilience of and throughecosystem services. Ecosystem Services doi:
10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012

Book chapters
Barthel, S. 2014. Resilience. In Donini, D.M. ed.
A Companion to Urban Anthropology. Wiley-­
Blackwell. pp. 228-446.
Cornell, S.E. 2014. Assessment and characterisation of the organic component of atmospheric­nitrogen deposition. In Sutton, M.A., K.E. Mason,
L.J. Sheppard, H. Sverdrup, R. Haeuber, W.K.
Hicks, eds. Nitrogen Deposition, Critical Loads
and Biodiversity Springer. pp. 107-116.
Daw, T. 2014. Ecosystem services and development.
In Desai, V., R. Potter, eds. The Companion to
Development Studies. Third Edition. Routledge.
pp. 356–361.
Deeming, H., M. Fordham, Å. Gerger Swartling.
2014. Resilience and adaptation to hydrometeorological hazards (Ch 4.2). In Quevauviller, P. ed.
Hydrometeorological Hazards: Interfacing Science and Policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Duit, A. 2014. Introduction: The comparative study of environmental governance. In Duit, A. ed.
State and Environment: The Comparative Study ofEnvironmental Governance. MIT Press. pp. 1-23.
Duit, A., O. Hall. 2014. Causes and consequencesof stakeholder participation in natural resource
management: Evidence from 143 Biosphere Reserves in fifty-­five Countries. In Duit, A. ed. Stateand Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Gover­nance. MIT Press. pp. 293-319.
Duit, A. 2014. Conclusion: An emerging ecostate?
In Duit, A. ed. State and Environment: The Comparative Study of Environmental Governance.
MIT Press. pp. 321-342.

Svedin, U. 2014. Challenges for planetary steward­
ship at the entry of the period of the Anthropocene.
In Filho W.L., A. Úbelis, D. Berzina, eds. Sustainable Development, Knowledge Society and Smart
Future Manufacturing Technologies. World Sustainability Series, Springer.
Svedin, U. 2014. Urban development and the environmental challenges: “Green” systems considerations for the EU. In Filho W.L., A. Úbelis, D.
Berzina, eds. Sustainable Development, Knowledge Society and Smart Future Manufacturing
Technologies. World Sustainability Series, Springer.
Wijermans, N., M. Schlueter. 2014. Agent-based
case studies for understanding of social-ecologicalsystems: Cooperation on irrigation in Bali. In­Kaminski, B., G. Koloch, eds. Advances In Social
Simulation: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of
the European Social Simulation Association.
Springer. pp. 295-305.
Policy, Practice and Outreach publications
Ahtiainen H., M.C. Öhman. 2014. Ecosystem
Services in the Baltic Sea – Valuation of Marine
and Coastal Ecosystem Services in the Baltic Sea.
TemaNord 2014:563
Azar, C., G. Finnveden, K. Johannesson, O. Johansson-Stenman, A. E. Nilsson, J. Rockström.
2014. Miljöpolitikens spelplan: Rapport från Miljöforskningsberedningen.
Azar, C., G. Finnveden, K. Johannesson, O.
Johanss­on-Stenman, A. Ledin, J. Munthe, A. E.
Nilsson, A. Nordin, J. Rockström, H. Smith, S,
Sörlin, M. Vahter. 2014. Inrätta ett miljöpolitisktråd direkt under statsministern. Dagens Nyheter
October 16.
Carabias, J., S, Hatfield-Dodds, C. Ituarte-Lima,
U. Pascual, I. Ring, I. (coordinating authors) J.
Ram Adhikari, M. Andriamahefazafy, S. Arora,
G. Erpul, M. Mokhtar Ali Fouda, M. George,
H. Hendriks, T. Kluvankova, C. Maretti, E.
Munyeneh, R. Oliva, R. Ongugo, G. Pataki,
A. Tezer, C. I. Zambrana-Flores. 2014. Definition
and typology of policy support tools and methodologies in the context of IPBES, Chapter 1 in
“Proposal for a catalogue of policy support tools
and methodologies”. Information Document IPBES/3/INF/8 for the 3th session of the Plenary of
the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.

60

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Daily, G.C., C.J. Katz, Jr. 2014. The Power ofTrees. Fubaisha Press, Japan (in Japanese).
Dile, Y. T., J. Rockström, L. Karlberg. 2014. Suitability of Water Harvesting in the Upper Blue Nile
Basin, Ethiopia: A First Step towards a Meso-scale
Hydrological Modeling Framework. Technical­report, Stockholm University, Stockholm Environment Institute, 24.
Elmqvist, T., S. Cornell, M.C. Öhman, T. Daw,
F. Moberg, A. Norström, Å. Persson, G. Peterson,
J. Rockström, M. Schultz, E. Hermansson-Török.
2014. Global sustainability and human prosperity– contribution to the Post-2015 agenda and thedevelopment of Sustainable Development Goals.
TemaNord 2014:527
Folke, C. 2014. The most obvious thing in a complex world: We are nature. In Atmosphere, Det
Sthlm, Hackholmssund. pp 28-35.
Folke, C., L. Hall. 2014. Reflections on People
and the Biosphere. Langenskiölds, Stockholm
Galaz, V., D. Galafassi, J. Tallberg, A. Boin, E. Hey,
C. Ituarte-Lima, J. Dunagan, P. Olsson, R. Österbergh, F. Westley. 2014. Connected Risks, Connected Solutions. Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University, and the Global Challenges
Foundation, Stockholm.
High Level Panel on Global Assessment of Resources for Implementing the Strategic Plan for
Biodiversity 2011-2020 (Rodrigues, C.M, et al.
incl. M. Schultz). 2014. Resourcing the Aichi Bio-diversity Targets, An Assessment of Benefits,­Investments and Resource needs for Implementing
the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020;
Second Report of the High Level Panel on Global
Assessment of Resources for Implementing theStrategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020; UNEP/CBD/COP/12/INF/4. www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/
cop/cop-12/information/cop-12-inf-04-en.pdf.
Hamann, M. 2014. Mapping social-ecologicalsystems and human well-being: A spatial exploration of the links between people and the environment in South Africa. Technical report, Stockholm
University, Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Ituarte-Lima, C., M. Schultz, T. Hahn, C. McDermott, S. Cornell. 2014. Biodiversity financing andsafeguards: lessons learned and proposed guide­lines. Stockholm: SwedBio/Stockholm ResilienceCentre at Stockholm University. Information Document UNEP/CBD/COP/12/INF/27 for the 12th
Conference of the Parties of the Convention on
Biological Diversity in Pyeongchang Korea
Nagendra, H., H.S. Sudhira, M. Katti, M. Tengö,
M. Schewenius. 2014. Urbanization and its impacts on land use, biodiversity and ecosystems in
India. INTERdisciplina Vol. 2 No. 2
Ogwal, S.F., M. Schultz. 2014. Co-Chairs´ Summary of Second Dialogue Seminar on Scaling up
Finance for Biodiversity, Quito 9-12 April 2014.
Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. ISBN: 92-9225-534-7. UNEP/CBD/WGRI/5/INF/9

Photo: Production PhotoCentre staff gathered during the 2014 retreat at Stora Karlsö.

Revi, A., D. Simon, S. Parnell, T. Elmqvist. 2014.
Consultation on the UN Open Working Groupon the SDGs’ Urban SDG Goal 11: Targets &­Indicators Report from a workshop in London
August 2014. 63 pp.
Rudberg, P., J. Granit, M. Klum, C. Nilsson,
J. Rockström. 2014. Gör vattenkraften verkligt
miljömässig. Svenska Dagbladet May 31 maj.
Schewenius, M., M. Tengö (editors). 2014. Special
issue: What is the scope of nature in cities? Current Conservation 8:1
Stafford Smith, M., J. Rockström, O. Gaffney, P.
Shyamsundar, N. Kanie, M.C. Öhman, G. Glaser,
D. Griggs. 2014. Supporting the development of
the SDGs. Future Earth Policy Brief #1. Future
Earth, Paris
Tallis H., J. Lubchenco with 240 co-signatories­including R. Biggs, G.D. Peterson. 2014. Working
together: A call for inclusive conservation. Nature
515: 27-28. doi:10.1038/515027a.
West, S., J. Haider, H. Sinare, T. Karpouzoglou.
2014. Beyond divides: Prospects for synergy between resilience and pathways approaches to sustainability. STEPS Working Paper 65, STEPS­Centre, Brighton, UK.
Yletyinen, J. 2014. Structural changes in marine
ecosystems: The application of novel network approaches to understand marine regime shift. Technical report, Stockholm University, Stockholm­Resilience Centre.

61

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Centre staff 2014
Centre Management
Carl Folke Science director
Olof Olsson Deputy director
Johan Rockström Executive director		Administration		
Astrid Auraldsson Coordinator to executive­director
Bengt Hall IT-support
Gunnar Jacobsson IT-support
Therese La Monde Office & financial
administrator
Christina Leijonhuvud Affiliated administrator
Cecilia Linder Human resources
Tanja Litvinova Financial & HR officer
Emina Muratspahic Head of administration
Henrik Pompeius Fundraiser
Maria Schewenius Project coordinator
Wenche Starck-Wistrand Project controller
Agneta Sundin Affiliated administrator
Practice, Policy and Communication
Maja Brisvall Project leader
Anna Emmelin Communication strategist
Marika Haeggman Communication officer
Sturle Hauge Simonsen Head of communication
Louise Hård af Segerstad Communication­strategist
Helene Karlsson Communication officer
Mattias Klum Affiliated Senior Advisor
Fredrik Moberg Senior strategic advisor
Fernanda Torre Project leader
		Modeling and Visualisation lab
Emma Sundström System developerÖrjan Bodin Senior Lecturer
		
Resilience and Development programme(Swedbio)
Pamela Cordero Financial controller &administrator
Sara Elfstrand Programme coordinator
Ellika Hermansson Török Senior advisor
Claudia Ituarte Lima Advisor
Pernilla Malmer Senior advisor
Mauricio Portilla Ospina Project assistantMaria Schultz Director
Hanna Wetterstrand Advisor
Marcus Öhman Senior advisor
BalticSTERN Secretatiat
Kerstin Blyh Officer
Siv Ericsdotter Head of secretariat
Jens Ratcovitch Field assistant
Education
Lisa Deutsch Senior Lecturer, Director of Studies(theme Landscapes and theme Urban)
Miriam Huitric Programme director

Cornelia Ludwig Education coordinator
Vadym Sokol Project assistant
Theme Landscapes		
Jennie Barron Affiliated researcher
Elin Enfors Researcher
Malin Falkenmark Affiliated senior researcher
Line Gordon Senior researcher (Deputy science
director)
Anna Helgeson PhD student
Louise Karlberg Affiliated researcher
Patrick Keys PhD student
Steven Lade Postdoc
Emelie Lindqvist PhD student
Rebecka Malinga PhD student
Megan Meacham (PECS) PhD student
Kirill Orach Project assistantDaniel Ospina Research assistant
Cibele Queiroz Postdoc
Angelina Sanderson Bellamy Researcher
Maja Schlüter Researcher
Hanna Sinare PhD student
Lan Wang Research assistantNanda Wijermans Postdoc
Theme Urban
Erik Andersson Researcher
Stephan Barthel Affiliated researcher
Sara Borgström Postdoc
Johan Colding Affiliated senior researcher
Thomas Elmqvist Professor
Matteo Giusti PhD student
Julie Goodness PhD student
Marnie Graham PhD student
Tom Green Postdoc
Åsa Green Affiliated researcher
Joshua Lewis PhD student
Jeff Ranara PhD student
Magnus Tuvendal Research assistant
My Sellberg (PECS) PhD student
Theme Marine
Emma Björkvik PhD student
Thorsten Blenckner Senior researcher
Wijnand Boonstra Researcher
Beatrice Crona Senior researcher
Tim Daw Researcher
Lisa Dellmuth Researcher
Elizabeth Drury O’neill PhD student
Jonas Hentati Sundberg PhD student
Jean-Baptiste Jouffray PhD student
Martina Kadin PhD student
Andres Marin PhD student
Andrew Merrie PhD student
Susa Niiranen PhD student
Albert Norström (PECS) Researcher
Magnus Nyström Senior lecturer
Saskia Otto Postdoc
Matilda Petersson Project assistantBjörn Schulte-Herbrüggen Postdoc
Matilda Thyresson Postdoc
Max Troell Affiliated senior researcher
Johanna Yletyinen PhD student
Rebecka Young Field assistant
Matilda Valman PhD student
James Watson Researcher
Henrik Österblom Senior lecturer (Deputy science
director)
Theme Regime shifts
Oonsie Reinette Biggs Researcher
Jamila Haider PhD student
Maike Hamann PhD student
Daniel Ospina PhD student
Garry Peterson Professor
Juan Carlos Rocha Gordo PhD student
Theme Global dynamics		
Victoria Bignet (EAT) Project assistantMarco Campenni Postdoc
Jonas Colen Torrens Project assistantRobert Constanza Affiliated senior researcher
Sarah Cornell Researcher
Ann-Sophie Crepin Affiliated senior researcher
Andrea Downing Researcher
Ingo Fetzer Researcher
Victor Galaz Senior lecturer
Tiina Häyhä Postdoc
Therese Lindahl Affiliated researcher
Will Steffen Affiliated senior researcher
Uno Svedin Senior researcher
My Svensdotter Project assistant
Sverker Sörlin Affiliated senior researcher
Brian Walker Affiliated senior researcher
Theme StewardshipÖrjan Bodin Associate senior lecturer
Arvid Bergsten PhD student
Andreas Duit Affiliated senior lecturer
Johan Enqvist PhD student
Diego Galafassi PhD student
Thomas Hahn Researcher
Malena Heinrup Project assistantIrene Håkansson Project assistantStuart Kininmonth Postdoc
Cecilia Lundholm Affiliated senior researcher
Vanessa Masterson PhD student
Helen Moor PhD student
Björn Nyqvist Postdoc
Jon Norberg Professor
Per Olsson Researcher
Ryan Plummer Senior research fellow
Angelina Sanderson Bellamy Researcher
Annica Sandström Postdoc
Lisen Schultz (PECS) Researcher
Maria Tengö Researcher
Franciska von Heland PhD student
Simon West PhD student

62

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Resilience Research School members 2014
Rivolala Andriamparany, PhD Stockholm­Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Thomas Elmqvist

Anna Helgeson, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Elin Enfors

Arvid Bergsten, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Örjan Bodin

Jonas Hentati Sundberg, PhD Stockholm­Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Henrik Österblom

Emma Björkvik, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Wijnand Boonstra

Malin Jonell, PhD Dept Ecology, Environment
and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Max Troell

Brita Boman, PhD Dept of Law, Stockholm­University
Supervisor: Jonas Ebbeson

Jean-Baptiste Jouffray, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Magnus Nyström

Linus Dagerskog, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University and Stockholm­Environment InstituteSupervisor: Johan Rockström

Martina Kadin, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Thorsten Blenckner

Stefan Daume, PhD Faculty of Forest Sciencesand Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen
Supervisor: Victor Galaz

Patrick Keys, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Line Gordon

Yihun Dile Taddele, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University and Stockholm­Environment InstituteSupervisor: Johan Rockström

Johannes Langemeyer, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University and Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, UniversitatAutònoma de Barcelona
Supervisor: Thomas Elmqvist

Elizabeth Drury O’Neill, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Beatrice Crona/Magnus Nyström

Joshua Lewis, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Henrik Ernstson

Johan Enqvist, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Maria Tengö

Emilie Lindkvist, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Jon Norberg/Maja Schlüter

Diego Galafassi, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Örjan Bodin

Rebecka Malinga, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Line Gordon

Matteo Giusti, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Stephan BarthelAndres Marin, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Beatrice Crona/Örjan Bodin

Julie Goodness, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Thomas Elmqvist

Vanessa Masterson, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Maria Tengö

Marnie Graham, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University and Departmentof Environment & Geography at Macquarie
University
Supervisor: Henrik Ernstson

Megan Meacham, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Garry Peterson

Jamila Haider, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Garry Peterson/Maja Schlüter
Maike Hamann, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Oonsie Reinette Biggs

Andrew Merrie, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Henrik Österblom
Helen Moor, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Jon Norberg
Kirill Orach, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Maja Schlüter

Daniel Ospina, PhD Stockholm Resilience­Centre, Stockholm University and Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics
Supervisor: Garry Peterson
Jeff Ranara, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Thomas Elmqvist/Garry Peterson
Juan Carlos Rocha Gordo, PhD Stockholm­Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Garry Peterson
Caroline Schill, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University and Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics
Supevisor: Therese Lindahl
Lisa Segnestam, PhD Dept Economic History,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Ronny Peterson
My Sellberg, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Garry Peterson
Hanna Sinare, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Line Gordon
Matilda Valman, PhD Dept. Political Science,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Henrik Österblom
Franciska von Heland, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Per Olsson
Lan Wang, PhD Department of Water Management, TU Delft
Supervisor: Line Gordon
Simon West, PhD Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
Supervisor: Lisen Schultz
Johanna Yletyinen, PhD Stockholm ResilienceCentre, Stockholm University
Supervisor: Thorsten Blenckner

63

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

Visiting reseachers
Heleen Vreugdenhil.

Timon McPhearson

Kirsten Abernethy

PhD in Policy Analysis from Delft University of Technology. The Netherlands.

Assistant Professor of Urban Ecology.
Coordinator for Environmental Science.
Tishman ­Environment and Design
Center, The New School. USA.

Lecturer in Environmental Social Scienceat the Environment and Sustainability
Institute at the University of Exeter. UK.

3–6 February

Parwinder Grewal

3 September–3 October

1–30 July

Professor and Department Head of the
Entomology and Plant Pathology DepartmentThe University of Tennessee.
Institute of Agriculture. USA.
24 March–30 June

Petr Matous

Richard C. Stedman
Associate Professor. Director, ­Human
Dimensions Research Unit. Cornell
University, Ithaca. USA.
1 August–10 December

Sarel Cilliers
Professor. Plant Ecology, Urban Ecology.
School of Environmental Sciences andDevelopment. North-West University(Potchefstroom Campus). Potchefstroom. South Africa.
5 April–30 June

Roxana Borquez Gonzalez
Researcher at the Center for Climate
and Resilience Research of Chile. Chile.

Egidius Kamanyi
Teaching Assistant at the University of
Dar es Salaam-Tanzania.
22–28 AugustFriederike Lempe
Phd candidate at the Thuenen-Instituteof Baltic Sea F­ isheries in Rostock,­Germany.
28 August–5 September

Associate Professor at the School of­Engineering, University of Tokyo. Japan
15–17 OctoberPascal Thoya
Research Scientist. Kenya Marine andFisheries Research Institute. Mombasa,
Kenya.
17–20 ­November

Deborah Goffner
Research Director, French National
Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS).
Cheikh Anta Diop University. Dakar,
Senegal.
January-December

21 April–2 May“Gamifying” resilience thinking
In November 2014 Centre researchers,
students and partners experimented
with a new way to explore resilience
concepts using games and theatre. Australian Theatre company Boho present-

ed the game “The Best Festival Ever,”a blend of science and interactive performance developed in collaboration
with researchers. Boho has long experience from producing science-theatre

based on climate and systems science.
Much of their work is inspired by­research conducted by the Stockholm­Resilience Centre.

PHOTO: D.Finnigan

64

STOCKHOLM RESILIENCE CENTRE

g
n
i
k
n
i
th ical systems
e
c
n
e
i
l
i
s
olog
e
r
g
ocial-ec
s
n
n
i
i
e
c
y
Appl for building resiliensrinciple
Seven pA PAR TNE

R WIT H1

resilieockholmt.sw
w
w

nce.su.seApplying resilience thinking
Seven principles for building resilience in social-ecological systems
Over the past decades, few concepts have gained such prominence as resilience, the capacity of a system to deal with change
and continue to develop.
This publication is a popular summary of the book “Principles
for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in SocialEcological Systems”, published by Cambridge University Press(2015).
It presents a set of seven principles that are considered crucial forbuilding resilience in social-ecological systems and discuss how
these principles can be practically applied.

A resilience thinking approach investigates how these interacting
systems of people and nature can best be managed in the face ofdisturbances, surprises and uncertainty. We define resilience as
the capacity of a system, be it an individual, a forest, a city or an
economy, to deal with change and continue to develop. But amid
the enormous attention it has attracted, confusion exists. What
does resilience actually means and how it should be applied?
Read more at www.stockholmresilience.org/applying-resilienceand download the brochure on the same page.

www.stockholmresilience.su.se