The 21st ifva Animation Category Jury Meeting Transcript
Jury Members: Lo Che-ying (Lo), Lam Kee-to (Lam), Yu Ka-ho (Yu)
Absent: Denis Yeung, Welby Chung
ifva representative: Kattie Fan (Fan), Szeto Chung Yan (Szeto)(Note: Chung had viewed all the finalist works on the day prior to the jury meeting.)
Fan:

Today, our task is to select the Gold Award winner, who will get $50,000 in cash, prizes
and a trophy, one Silver Award winner, who will get $30,000 in cash, prizes and a trophy,
one Special Mention winner, who will get a certificate. We can discuss all the finalist works
and then nominate the winners. Welby Chung has already seen the finalist works andchosen the award winner and left comments, which we will convey to you in due course.
First of all, what is your view on Shear Marks?

Lo:

We can make general comments about each of the works.

Lam:

I agree.

Lo:

Shear Marks is a relatively traditional animation. For a young artist, this presents a big
challenge. We can see that he has a firm grasp of technique. This work is hard to do. It is
about sentiments and focuses on two main characters. Acting is important. The visualtechnique is unusual, and not like the Japanese style we’re used to, but the feelings are
similar. The sense of nostalgia is there, but the characters lack a certain humanity. The artist
wants to give the work a contemporary feel, but the number of scenes and characters are
not enough, and the story just focuses on the two main characters. The treatment in certain
scenes is good. There is a lot of dialogue, but in some scenes there is not enough while inothers, there is too much. This is the fault of the director, but in fact, this is a difficult film
to make. If it had live actors, perhaps they could convey the necessary feelings, but for an
animation, the director needs to handle more aspects and their task is more difficult. Perhaps
if they could find two talented young actors to play the role, this could be a touching film.
For an animation, this is quite a challenge. Now it’s not a complete success, but the artist
had achieved something.

Lam:

When watching these works a second time, three works stood out for me, and Shear Marks
is one of them. This is a dramatic film, and the plot progression is important. I think they
manage to convey the story. The sense of nostalgia is there and the story is complete. The
pacing is good, although the ending is rushed. I was touched by the scene happening several
years later. The work has many details that makes it more moving on the big screen. It uses
dramatic means to talk about the end of an era. It is the collective memory of Hong Kong,
with public housing estates, rain storms and mudslides. For Hong Kong audiences, thefeeling is even stronger. However, the visuals are not strong, and younger audiences may
not understand fully. There are not a lot of people working on this production, so this isquite an achievement. Nowadays most animation works are just viewed on the televisionor computer screen in the production stage, and artists neglect the big screen experience. If
the creator of Shear Marks saw this work on the big screen, they may feel there is a lot of1room for improvement. One of the regrettable things is that even though the workemphasizes light and there is detailed lighting treatment of the characters, the charactershave no shadows. I think this is because the artist only saw the work on the small screen
and neglected this part. The story is solid and talks about the passing of an era, and is about
sentiments and memories, which is attractive to me. The treatment of eyes is also
problematic, at the beginning the black irises are pretty, but then it switched to green. I
don’t understand why they did that, I think it’s a flaw. It stands out because some dramaticelements are treated well, like the use of lamp-posts to reflect the changing of times, whichcoincides with the characters’ growing up. However the main character’s childhood friend
stops growing, which becomes a dramatic effect. For ifva, the technical competence isimportant, but the message behind it is even more crucial. The impact of Shear Marks isstrong, and that’s why it is one of my top three choices.
Yu:

I agree with both Lo and Lam. The story is solid, but the artist is limited by their technicalcapabilities. Their 3D capabilities limit the characterization in this film. I have seen
previous works by one of the films creators, Ng Kai Chung, and know that he has the ability
to handle the rhythm and expression of characters. But in this 3D work, I see that he faces
a lot of limitations. For example, when the mother apologizes, her hands are out of control.
It is obvious that the creator wants to do something but has limitations.

Lo:

In addition to acting, when the main character throws the soda to the old man, the action isstrange. His arm joints are not coordinated. It’s not that it is like this throughout. Some
scenes are okay.

Lam:This is a matter of technical abilities and the time limitations.

Lo:This work is a challenge. This kind of 3D work is rare. Some parts are not realistic. It isdifficult to do well. For example, the side view of characters is thick and heavy, the shapechanges and the mouth is strange. From what I know, the artist knew about these problems
and attempted to fix things. This version is the best one so far.

Lam:

Some scenes that capture the children’s mood are done well. For animators, one of theirpartners is computers. If they know about the problems, they could have done better. Even
simple programming depends on how it is used. On the whole this work has flaws. The
technology at their disposal can only take them so far within their time limitations, so these
problems appear. When watching it, audiences know that this work has limitations, but they
don’t mind. ifva should emphasize what the artists want to express and emphasize.

Yu:

The way I feel about technique is whatever tools you use, there are limitations, even withpencils. I look at how the artist adapts to these tools, and whether they can find a way out
and not become limited by these tools. For this work, I feel that they have not transcended
these limitations, but are bound by them.

Lam:

You may deduct points for this.

Fan:

The next work is Bluebeard’s Castle.
2

Lo:This work is visually attractive, and uses a lot of Japanese artistic images, and is obviously
a collage. Even though it is something we’ve seen a lot before, the artist’s treatment makes
it attractive. The visual effects are good and the characters are simple and effective and thetreatment is fine. However the length of the work makes it less detailed than I would like.
It’s only a few minutes long, and goes by in a flash. What the artist wants to say is there.
There may be a lot of messages hidden behind the work, but for its short duration, it feels
complete. The important thing is that it is effective. If it can be more detailed, then it’d beeven better, especially for the climactic scene at the end where the character is afraid. Now
the scene seems to be too brief.

Lam:

The artist knows what they want to express, and uses just three minutes to express what
they think about the Bluebeard story. The good thing about it is the visual style. The topic
is expressed well. But there are many elements in the Bluebeard story that the artist leaves
out. For a three-minute short, the artist filters the Bluebeard story according to their own
interpretation. For example, the three wives that are killed are shown through kimonos, andtogether with Bluebeard himself, they form the four seasons. I am not sure if this is theirown concept or if they took it from other sources, because the story of Bluebeard had been
retold many times. Even if they took the concept from other sources, it’s okay. Now thecharacters’ clothing becomes an important dramatic element, which is well expressed. The
lead character’s wife is blood red and the color of autumn. The wives are like collector’s
item for the castle owner, which is interesting. However, Bluebeard is too much like animage, and is just used as a tool by the artist, and his intentions should be the main point of
the story. The artist simply presents this concept in 3 minutes without going more deeply
into it. They have done well, and when I saw it in the first round, I immediately felt that it
deserves to be among the finalist. But for awards, this work is too small in scale. The spatial
treatment is strong, and the plot-point with the opening of the lock is meaningful. The deathscene at the end is short and sweet. It takes the original story and adds dramatic elements,
like the use of kimonos, which represents certain identity when worn by people. Amongthe ten works, this one is small in scale.

Yu:

I have not read the original Bluebeard story, and looks at this from someone who doesn’tknow the story, and I have a lot of questions. The ending seems abrupt to me. The main
character discovers three dead wives in the room, but why does he become a demon? I don’t
understand the psychological transformation. Bluebeard appears too simple and weak, andI don’t understand the princess’ motivations.

Lam:

That is a key point.

Fan:

How about Dancing Eye?

Lo:

The concept of Dancing Eye is interesting, but I don’t understand how the different
elements are put together. The movements of the gymnast and the transparent glass are
good, and the main theme is expressed well. However the film is fragmented. You canunderstand it as a story about a child who is lost in his own world, which can easily bedestroyed, and only children can know about and understand this world. This is a lively
world full of music. When the child gets a pair of glasses, this world is lost. This simple
3

concept is expressed well. For a 3D world, some of the details are distinctive and different
from the usual works we see. Perhaps it is its treatment of light and shadow and texture.
The whole film has a special look to it, but some parts are strange. It is unique and personal,
and not everyone may understand it. For me, I am ambivalent, but I can see that the artist
has put in a lot of effort.
Lam:

A common thread among the works this year is that the artists want to express the themesof their works in a visual way. Dancing Eye is one such work. I think the artist does notwant to be too orderly. If you try to figure out the logic behind it, you’d be lost in a maze.
The artist does not want to explain too much and just express themselves clearly which I
think is a good point. Within this 6-minute work, the artist expresses what they feel aboutvisual memories in childhood, which may not be something you can understand. From thelittle girl’s perspective, her vision is not three-dimensional and distances between objects
are not distinguished. Her perception of space is not real, but has a fantastical texture. The
artist emphasizes the sounds associated with touch, and this is especially apparent on the
big screen. The sounds of cloth and metal are expressed in detail, and the artist tries toconvey a new sense of texture. The little girl wants to create a pet, a visual teddy bear whichcomes out of her memory and delights her. This worries her family and the glass breaks,
which seems to suggest that she has super-powers and her vision is advanced. You caninterpret it this way, even though this may not be the artist’s intentions. Then her family
feels that there is some problem with her eyes and takes her to get glasses. When she putson the glasses, the little girl feels that she has lost her special sense, and becomes sad. Whenshe cries, you feel that the story is over, and she grows up. The details in the film are quite
good, which gives the film flavor when you view it a second time. However, what it tries
to express is too personal and individualistic. It is a good work, but not among my top three.

Yu:This is the third or fourth time I’ve seen it. Watching it on the big screen, I noticed things
I hadn’t before. For example, the scene where the glass breaks, I had not noticed thebackground sound, but this time, I heard the sound of the parents quarreling. Now the scene
can be seen as the girl is having a temper tantrum. Interpreted this way, I feel that this work
is not just nostalgic, but is on another level. It uses the child’s perspective to criticize theadult world.

Lam:

This is a fun work, and reminds me of two mainstream films, the Japanese cartoon The
Anthem of the Heart and the surveillance in The 5th Wave. The artist expresses this theme,
and it’s clear that they have something to say, but doesn’t know how to get it across, because
they feel that once they said it, it would destroy everything. This is the way young people
look at the world.

Yu:

On a technical level, I agree with Lo’s views. Some parts are strange. I’m not sure if it’s atechnical problem or art direction. Everything is pink, but that crystal figure does not match
this pink world.

Lam:

This work emphasizes that the child’s perspective is crystal clear.

Szeto:

Chung’s view of this work is that it can be Special Mention. On the whole the story is4smooth, but the lines in the child’s world are stiff. Also the gymnast doll is pretty, and its
action and details are fine. But the work is too tidy in all respects, and lacks the independent
spirit and creativity that ifva emphasizes. Among the ten works, this one impressed him
the most, although it does not quite deserve the Gold and Silver awards, and herecommends it for Special Mention.
Fan:

Eye’m Free.

Lo:

Eye’m Free is quite interesting, and the art direction is unique, and so is the modeling,lines, color, action and storytelling. It is very personal and other people may not readily
understand. The work is long and the content is rich, but reading its synopsis, I cannot get
what it is trying to say at all. This film is worth re-visiting so as to appreciate its details. As
an independent animation, this is quite a personal work, and has to do with the artist’s
thoughts on the telephone world and interaction. I think this is an interesting work, and isa modern view of the world. I would need to watch it a few more times to fully appreciate
it. After the first viewing, I thought it is interesting and some scenes are inspired, though I
was not really touched. The tone of the work is distant, and many parts are fragmented.
Also there are many mis-written words, and even though this is a small problem, it affects
my viewing experience, and makes me think the work is careless.

Lam:

At the press conference, I talked to Eye’m Free’s director, and discovered that this is theirfirst film, and they are unfamiliar with animation techniques, which shows up with thisfilm. The technique of expression is simple and unrefined and there are a lot of
inadequacies. On first viewing, I quite liked it. The story is simple and expressed in termsof psychology. It is about the future and ways of seeing things, and the layered message isexpressed well. In common with Shear Marks, there are dramatic elements aboutchildhood. The first part focuses on the boy, while the girl becomes more important later.
In both works, the girl serves as the creative muse. The best part about this work is that it
is expressed visually. People in the future rely on machines and glasses. At the beginningone of the main character’s eyes are damaged, and he becomes disabled. The girl uses aerial
camera to help him get a new eye. The new eye is capable of seeing many things, whichtakes the main character out of his usual world. There are two levels, one is a changed
perspective that is not the same as his usual self, the other is the difference between looking
and seeing. Look is just viewing, while seeing is understanding. The artist does not fully
express their ideas, but attempts to use dramatic means of conveying their message. They
have not found the answer, but for a first work, this is normal. The thing that attracts me tothis work is that it uses a limited means to record the times as the artist sees it. It isfragmented, and just like Shear Marks, it is about friendship and innocent sentiments, a
bit like puppy love. In this respect it is stronger than Shear Marks. The most valuable
aspect of the work is that the artist uses contemporary perspectives to express their ideas.
This is a very personal work, and is among my top three.

Yu:

I think its storytelling is sloppy.

Lam:

It has to do with ability.

5

Yu:

That’s right. It’s a matter of ability. For example, there is a scene where the boy is lying on
the grass, and the girl suddenly produces an eye out of nowhere.

Lo:

Anything goes.

Yu:

Many scenes are forced. The artist puts in whatever idea comes to mind without
considering how to set it up. The interesting thing is that they are sensitive in theirobservation of the relationship between the environment, human beings and technology,
but they are a little bit naive. The modern view of the world is virtual and internal. The
aerial shots suggest escaping from one’s environment, but you have to rely on technology
as means. Their artist statement sums up the work’s central themes. Does the girl embody
the message they want to convey? In one scene, the lens flies in and out. What is themeaning of that? The story is layered with meaning that can be decoded, but the storyline
is sloppy.

Fan:

eve?

Lo:

The idea is good, and I don’t know if the story is original. It is about a cicada and squirrel.
From the synopsis the story is worth developing, but unfortunately, many elements are notactualized. First, there is no story and just two characters, and the drama comes only fromthe two characters and their actions, but the effect is not strong enough, and the audience
does not understand what they are doing and why they do it. On the whole, the art direction
is consistent and in the style of illustrations. Even though the drawing is simple, its moodis good. However the cicada looks like a frog. The art direction is interesting. If you don’t
delve into the story, you can see this is a children book illustration style of animation. The
story could have been more touching, but right now it is not expressed well.

Lam:

What does the name eve refer to?

Lo:

It is used in the sense of thing that happens on the day before, but if you don’t read thesynopsis, the images are not constructed well. I really thought the cicada was a frog, andhis voice is not that of a cicada. It is interesting in that it is a stylized treatment, but mostpeople won’t get that it is a cicada and therefore won’t be able to understand the story. They
just see several creatures.

Lam:

I think this work is suitable for viewing on a mobile phone, and is slightly inadequate forviewing on the big screen. When viewed on a mobile phone, the squirrel is quite cute, buton the big screen, the visual details are flat. Also I discovered on the big screen that thesquirrel is the main character, while the cicada represents the memory of the forest in winter.
The story is told from the squirrel’s perspective and he feels he has to protect the cicada.
Finding the warmth of friendship is the main theme of the film. After one minute, you feelthat the film is short and condensed, but at six minutes in length, it lacks content. The
relationship between the squirrel and cicada is interesting. The crow appears several times,
and functions only as a villain. In winter, memories are reawakened, and they find warmthin friendship. However the final scene goes overboard. The film has worth-while concept,
and if it can be developed at a later date, it would make a moving film. Now the film merely
6scratches the surface of the main themes. The work uses animation well, but compared withother films, it is just a minor work.
Yu:

If you freeze frame the film, each frame is pretty, but on the whole, the rhythm is too rushed.
It seems that the artist had not considered the overall effect during the production stage.
They focus their energies on certain shots, and then go on to the next one, until the wholefilm is completed and they splice the film together, without considering how to tell thestory. I watched the film three times, and still did not understand what the role of the cicada
is in different parts. Many works from animation masters are like this, but the overall
impression is different. I feel the artist does not know what they are doing, and the overall
result lacks cohesion. It is hard for the audience to get into it and discover things forthemselves.

Szeto:

This is one of Chung’s favorite work. According to ifva criteria, he feels that this film
displays a high sense of independent spirit. Technically the treatment is not complete andflawed, and there are jump-frames. However the treatment of animals is smooth. One of
the most memorable part is the depiction of the crow looking down from its perspective,
which is rarely seen. Even though the work is not mature, it displays independent spirit inaccordance with ifva’s requirements. So this is his top choice.

Fan:

Mur Mur?

Lo:

The film is too short. The concept is there, but that’s it. It lacks a punch line that moves theaudience. Perhaps because it chooses a detached perspective, the audience is not touched.

Lam:

Compared with eve, this is better. This year there are many works about parting and death,
which are mostly narrative films that uses dramatic means to express this theme. This work
relies on atmosphere and depicts the emptiness and quietness after attending a funeral, anduses a fly to express this feeling. The work emphasizes the texture of oil painting, and thegrayish white tones make the brush strokes apparent, which gives it a human touch. It
accurately reflects the mood after attending a funeral. Even though the work is short, it
manages to express this theme. As a work, the technique is good, although it is on a small
scale. It shows that local artists are capable of having their own points of view andexpressing them. This reflects a good creative atmosphere, and that’s the reason why I
selected it as one of the finalists. This can be a Special Mention. Not just longer works can
win awards. As long as the concept and execution is good, the length is not important.

Yu:

I like this work very much, perhaps because it moves me, on account of my personal
experience. It’s a personal thing. My feelings about funerals are deep, because my motherpassed away several years ago. I think the work expresses the feeling of sadness and at thesame time being unable to cry. It uses the sound of two mosquitoes buzzing to express thisfeeling, which is unique and rarely seen. From the perspective of traditional animation, thework does not have many techniques, but the artist uses interesting visual language toexpress themselves, which makes it out of the ordinary.

7

Lo:

The concept is good, and the combination of funeral and mosquitoes clearly expresses what
the artist wants to say. But as an animation, the work is inadequate. If this was not an
animation but simply two pictures, one of the funeral and one of mosquitoes, the concept
could have been brought out. As an animation, the sound of mosquitoes is important, but
this effect can also be done with a picture book. So I think the artist could have used the
medium of animation in a more effective way.

Yu:

I agree. As just a visual work, it is outstanding. But how should we evaluate it as animation?

Lam:

The effect and atmosphere is good, and reminds me of Polanski’s Repulsion, at the end ofwhich the police enters the apartment, and the space is quiet except for the buzzing of flies
and the dead rabbit behind the television. Of course, that film is a classic, and the impact
is great. This work conveys a similar feeling. If he had seen this work, he may have copied
this idea, but if he had not, then at least he should know that people before him had dealt
with similar ideas. Artists could take from classic films and develop their ideas in a stronger
way. I like this work too.

Yu:

You feel this work is clichéd?

Lam:

It is simplistic. The creator of Eye’m Free is not technically proficient, but is able toexpress their feelings directly without too many considerations. But that is also their flaw.

Fan:

The creator of Mur Mur is a visual artist. The creator of the next work, Red Egg is a
performance artist.

Lo:

As sand painting, it is good, but as animation, it is inadequate. The artist fails to handle
storytelling rhythm and means in a proper way. For sand animation, morphing is aninteresting element, but here the morphing is not thorough. There are too many messages
condensed within the frames, and there is no room for reflection, which is a waste. There
are many pictures, but they pass by so quickly and the audience does not have time to fully
appreciate the emotional content of each picture. It needs to be at least twice as long. Even
though the messages are quite direct, the film is about life, so there should be some room
for thought. Some parts could even be repeated so that the audience can see them moreclearly and form a deeper impression.

Lam:

The visual effects of Red Egg are extraordinary, and watching it on the big screen, I am
able to appreciate its many details. In the first round, this is one of my three favorites, but
after seeing it again, I have changed my mind because the work cannot bear repeatedviewing. At first I marveled at the technique and what the artist wants to express. I
mentioned that the artist’s view of Hong Kong is contemporary. When evaluating a work,
I look at whether its elements are adequate, and timing is also important. Watching it asecond time, I see that the concept of the red egg and the transition to red ribbons andmemory of an era are expressed well. In addition to the visual expression, I also pay
attention to the timing. This artist is good at visual expression, and the details convey strong
feelings. The music helps a lot, but it does not quite match the visuals. I am still deliberating
in my mind. Technically it is good, but whether it bears repeated viewing is also important.
8Yu:

The nice thing about sand painting is the transition between images, which sets up theaudience’s expectation and anticipation. However, this work has not realized this, which isa waste. The pictures are pretty, but with morphing, it would be even better. It uses
traditional animation techniques, but falls short of the standards of traditional animationsuch as pacing and rhythm.

Lo:

Because it is time-consuming to do. Undeniably, the work has many details and the lines
are fine, but sand animation does not emphasize detailed treatment. Of course it’s good thatthe artist is able to be detailed, but they should keep the lines and do morphing. Now it is
no different from sand painting and merely captures such painting. The best sand painting
used to have simple shapes because complicated shapes take too much time to do. However
this is not important. The important thing is how to use this type of movement to create
visual effects, which does not have to be complicated. Sometimes just changing the camera
angles is interesting enough. The good thing about sand is that even if you drop it willynilly, it creates unexpected texture, and you don’t need to be too refined. Sand does not
require detailed treatment.

Yu:

It’s a pity that the work fails to deliver the special quality of sand animation.

Szeto:

Chung thinks that the story is clichéd. He expects to see more transformations on the big
screen, but failed to find any, so he deducted marks off it.

Fan:

The Third Hand?

Lo:The Third Hand is a small, simple and compact work. Over 90% of the effort put into it iseffective. Of course I question why it’s like this, but purely as a short film, it offers an easyto-understand story. The whole film is composed of action with no dialogue, but the story
is clear. The action of the basketball is effective, and the treatment of the strange hand isfresh. There is a sense of speed that, when combined with music, is interesting. It leaves
an impression upon initial viewing, and is easy on the eyes. It is not deep, but entertaining,
and the art direction is unique.

Yu:

The best thing about it is not the content, but rather the imagination: if I had an extra hand,
what would I do with it on the basketball court? This premise is fun. As Lo said, it
communicates its idea well, and the treatment of action is strong. But my feeling is that itis promoting the use of drugs, which is problematic. I could see The Third Hand as an
auteur work. When viewing it a second time, I feel that the action of basketball playing isdetailed. The strength of this director is in their treatment of action, which they express
well. They must have referenced a lot of other works. This film shows that independent
animators are equipped with a high level of technical skills.

Yu:

I agree with what Chung said in his comments, which is that the work is very complete. In
the last scene, everyone has a third hand, so is it promoting something immoral? I don’t
think so. The director is posing exactly this question in the work. It also made me think
about society nowadays, and criticisms about cronyism. I felt I gained something after
watching this film, even though I doubt whether this is intended by the artist. When they9

introduced the work, they did not seem to have put too much thought into it. For them, it
is simply a fun film.
Lam:

What did Chung say?

Szeto:

He likes the work, but feels that among the finalists, this one is more commercial and lessindependent. It is not that this is not a good work, but according to the criteria of thiscompetition, it does not deserve an award.

Fan:

Fishy.

Lo:

I like its mood, which is good. On a technical level, the world of paper folds is beautiful.
Unfortunately, the story-telling is not good, and should have been better. It is not a matterof the work’s duration, but rather its overall treatment. Right now there is only a little bitof what the artist wants to say, and they need to digest the subject matter better. The mostserious issue is that there is no dialogue, but the theme is complex and requires moredetailed treatment. There is insufficient description of the main character’s psychology.
The time-lapse is half-baked and is not effective because only a few minutes had passed
and we cannot see much change. There is nothing wrong with the subject matter, but theartist needs to develop the story with more details. The relationship between human beingsand fish can be fleshed out more. I really like the art direction, which is beautiful andtextured, and the modeling is interesting. However, it is easy to confuse the characters, andthey do not leave much of an impression.

Lam:

After watching it on the big screen, I raised the marks for this film. I looked at thestoryboard when the film was still in production, and found the story lacking then. The
texture of paper is interesting even on the TV screen. When paper gets in contact with water,
it should break apart, but this treatment adds another visual imagining. The grayish whitecolor matches that world, and upon second viewing this feeling is even stronger. Using theworld of paper to depict fish is advantageous. Mainstream films would often mix in manydifferent elements, but Fishy is simply about the head of a family of fish who becomes ahuman being and faces life as a laborer. Even though the film is simple, its ideas are well
expressed. This is apparent on the storyboard, and now that the film is made, the message
is even more interesting. Fish laborer and life has dramatic tension, which touches on lifeand responsibility. The visual treatment is clever.

Yu:

This work’s artistic style carries forward the artist’s previous works, and theme is similar,
which is about the helplessness of life. I agree with Lo that some parts are confusing andyou don’t know what the artist is trying to say. One of the problems is that the characterslook too similar, and you can’t tell which the main character is. The effect and texture ofpaper is pretty, and the art direction is good. But I can’t tell what the significance of paper
is.

Lo:

That’s right, I agree. Some parts are not expressed clearly enough because of the use of
paper. For example, when the character is working at the sushi restaurant, there are shotsof fish bones, but paper fails to adequately represent the shape of fish bones, which affects
10

the impact of the scene. There is a big contrast between fish and the eating of fish, and theuse of paper cannot show things like blood, which is a waste. This is a matter of choice.
Why use paper?
Yu:

Is it because it is trendy?

Lam:

I think that’s probably the intention.

Lo:

Many scenes fail to touch the audience and we don’t know what the artist is trying to say.
Even if we have the synopsis in front of us, we still don’t know what each shot is about.

Szeto:

Chung appreciates the creativity of the artists and admires their ways of expression,
because it takes a lot of time and effort. However the story is too weak and it is hard tounderstand what it is about, so the entertainment value is low. He got lost in the middle anddid not understand what the story is trying to say.

Lo:

The middle part is a bit confused.

Szeto:

But Chung appreciates their effort, and thinks that the work can be a Special Mention.

Fan:

The last work is Behind the Schoolbag.

Lo:Among the ten finalists, there is a lot of variety, and in terms of animation production, thisyear has seen a good crop of films. To a certain extent, all the works succeed in part in what
they set out to do, but on the whole they all lack something. Sometimes it is problems withthe story, other times it is technical or other issues. Behind the Schoolbag is rare in that it
strikes a balance. The subject matter is unique, and its director does their job and is effective.
The use of dialogue is appropriate and the art direction is distinctive. On the whole this isa high level work.

Lam:

Watching it a second time, I appreciate how the character forms the desire to kill after beingbullied, which is chilling. The dramatic treatment is strong. The most attractive aspect of
the film is that it talks about a current social phenomenon. The subject matter is good, but
it stays within the confines of drama, and the solution is simply a kind of symbolism.
“Being happy” does not really solve the problem. This work is contemporary, and we candiscuss it, but is it the best? I think it lacks completeness. With regards to the one beingbullied, the guy wearing glasses, the treatment of the schoolbag and the visual treatment
has greater impact than what live action can achieve, and utilizes the power of animation.
This is one of the works I highlighted, but I have not given it the top place.

Yu:

This is my favorite film, and many aspects are well executed. For example in the scene
where the character is being beaten by the buff guy on the MTR, the director uses the train
door, which is brilliant. The dialogue is also good.

Lo:

If it was live action, the scene would have been awkward. With this kind of dialogue andmodeling, the scene is funny, and this is what animation is about. It uses animation’s art
11direction to express something in a conceptual way, thus sparking audience’s imagination
in a convincing way. Even though there is not a lot of dialogue, it works.
Yu:

Dialogue helped this work a lot, and reduced the artist’s effort.

Szeto:

This is Chung’s favorite. As a viewer, one feels for the main character, especially in thescene where he is being beaten on the MTR, he pulls out a plastic knife, which isanticlimactic because it is out of his expectation. However, there are too many static scenes,
but for this kind of work, there should be more action, and there is insufficientpsychological expression. Chung has high expectations of this director and thinks that hecould have done more. So he recommends him for Silver Award rather than Gold.

Lo:

I think the work is just right with the use of static scenes, which gives the audience room
to breathe.

Fan:

Many of the entrants in ifva this year are students or first timers, while some are moreexperienced. It is like Open Category and Youth Category, which you may wish to take
into consideration.

Lo:

My nomination for Gold is Behind the Schoolbag, Silver is Shear Marks, Special Mention
is Eye’m Free or Dancing Eye.

Lam:

Gold for Shear Marks, Silver for Eye’m Free, Special Mention for Dancing Eye.

Yu:Gold for Behind the Schoolbag, Silver for Shear Marks or Fishy, Special Mention for
Mur Mur.

Fan:

There are no nominations for The Third Hand, Red Egg and Bluebeard’s Castle. Chungchose eve. Let’s decide the Gold first. Lam chose Shear Marks, Lo and Yu chose Behind
the Schoolbag, Chung chose eve.

Lo:

All ten finalists achieved ifva’s requirements. We have different points of view, but they
are not in conflict. I have high expectations for the Gold winner, which is that it bears
repeated viewing and stands up after watching three or four times. With some works,
watching once is enough. Shear Marks does not stand up as well as Behind the Schoolbag.

Lam:

Shear Marks is an optimistic work, while Behind the Schoolbag is dark. I really like
Eye’m Free, but it does not deserve Gold, but I hope it can get Silver, because it is strongly
independent. Shear Marks is not just independent for independent’s sake and its story issimple and easy to understand. But on the big screen, the character’s lack of shadows takes
away from its completeness. The director uses some simplified characters. They used
simple resources to make this film and achieved their aims, so it deserves recognition.

Lo:

Shear Marks is an ambitious work, and is a difficult animation to make. Yet it is limited
by technology. Comparatively, Behind the Schoolbag uses simple lines and is effective.

12

Lam:

I should add that Behind the Schoolbag is more international. With Shear Marks, even if
the audience is not from Hong Kong, they would still be interested in the Shek Kip Mei
housing estate, which represents Hong Kong’s visual memories. The Autumn Moon
festival scene with the convenience store gives it an added layer of meaning. International
audiences will appreciate its local Hong Kong flavor. As for completeness, Behind the
Schoolbag is superior.

Fan:

For Silver award nomination, Lo and Yu chose Shear Marks, Lam chose Eye’m Free,
Chung chose Behind the Schoolbag, and Yu also picked Fishy.

Lo:

So the Gold is a toss-up between Shear Marks and Behind the Schoolbag. Shear Marks
lacks human touch, and the atmosphere is stagey. It just focuses on two kids, and they lackinteraction with their environment. There ought to be more characters, but I heard becauseof technical issues, this was not achieved and they gave up. Comparatively speaking,Behind the Schoolbag is more minimal, clever and effective.

Lam:

I am not opposed to Behind the Schoolbag getting Gold. If so, I would like Eye’m Free to
get Silver. The most important issue is that this is a work by a single artist and represents
their expression, so I treasure it because it differs from mainstream values. It uses a
subjective way of expression, and conveys its subject matter well. Shear Marks andBehind the Schoolbag are done by professional animators, while Eye’m Free starts with
an idea and is more independent. Hong Kong has many such works, and Youth category
entrants just tell simple stories using their limited knowledge of cinema.

Yu:

I am swayed by Lam. If we use subjective viewpoint, independent and experimental spirit,
which is rare in animation, as criteria, then Mur Mur and Eye’m Free are superior.

Fan:

As far as ifva is concerned, we emphasize different qualities every year. In recent years,
Animation category rarely mentions unique vision and experimental spirit, so you may
wish to consider these.

Lo:

Eye’m Free is unique in terms of its color and modeling, but on the whole it is very
personal and some parts don’t work. For awards, simply having a deep subject matter is
not sufficient. It just manages to convey the subject matter and is interesting. With Mur
Mur I don’t see how the work can be further developed. The production team is too small,and it’s hard to say what they set out to do. The team is just made up of people who
graduated from college two or three years ago and barely fulfills their requirement. One
should just consider the quality of the work. Shear Marks can be seen as a commercial
work, and the story is clichéd yet contains many new attempts by the artist, so it is very
independent. The latest generation of artists all grew up watching commercial films, andare inevitably influenced by them. It’s best to consider the quality of the works.

Lam:

Many works are left out. I also like Mur Mur, but I find it too short. What can we do inthis situation? Take a vote?

Yu:

Lo, why did you not pick Fishy? You had praised it, so I’d like to know why.
13

Lo:

Among the three works (Fishy, Shear Marks and Behind the Schoolbag), Fishy lost themost marks because it doesn’t tell its story well. It could have done better, which is a pity.
Fishy only achieved 60% of what it set out to do, while with Shear Marks it’s 80% and
Behind the Schoolbag, 90%.

Fan:

So let’s take a vote to determine the Gold Award. How many people vote for Behind the
Schoolbag? (Yu and Lo raise their hands). So the Gold Award goes to Behind the
Schoolbag. Nominations for Silver include Fishy, Shear Marks and Eye’m Free.

Lam:

My view is unchanged. I think Silver should go to Eye’m Free.

Yu:

Shear Marks is more highly praised.

Lo:Awards can mean many things, Shear Marks takes a traditional subject matter and isambitious in trying to achieve it. Compared with an experimental subject, this is more of achallenge, and deserves encouragement.

Lam:

So it’s two against one? Are you still considering?

Yu:

I am leaning towards Shear Marks.

Fan:

So the Silver goes to Shear Marks. How about Special Mention?

Yu:

I agree with Lo. Fishy is technically accomplished, but Shear Marks is more passionate.

Fan:

How about Special Mention?

Lo:

I don’t mind Eye’m Free getting it. I hope the artist does more in the future.

Lam:

Eye’m Free missed out on Silver, so I hope it gets Special Mention.

Lo:

Ka Ho? Can we have two Special Mentions?

Lam:

If there were two, I choose Eye’m Free and Mur Mur. Dancing Eye is hampered bytechnology. ifva should encourage independent spirit.

Lo:

I agree.

Yu:

Let’s have two.

Fan:

Okay, so Eye’m Free and Mur Mur get Special Mention.

14

Animation Category
Gold Award
Behind the Schoolbag
Ho Chun-yu
Silver Award
Shear MarksLam Ho-tak, Kwok Man-ho, Ng Kai-chungSpecial Mention
Eye’m Free
Pau Ching-yee Louise
Mur Mur
Lo Hin-kit

15