1
References-Applications
Ayalon, H. (1995). Math as a gatekeeper: Ethnic and gender inequity in taking of thesciences in Israel. American Journal of Education, 104, 34-56.
Ayalon, H. (2002). Mathematics and sciences course taking among arab students inisrael: a case of unexpected gender equality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Spr
2002 v24, 63-80
Baker, C. (1990). The effectiveness of bilingual education. Journal of Multilingual andMulticultural Development, 11, 269-277.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D. L., Watson, M. & Scheps, E. (1995). Schools ascommunities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, andperformance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627-658.
Bray, M., & Murray, T. R. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: Different
insights from different literatures and the value of multilevel analyses. Harvard EducationalReview, 65, 472-490.
Bonesronning, H. (1996). Student Body Composition and School Performance: Evidence
from Norway. Education Economics, 4, 11-31.
Bressoux, P. (1996). The effects of teachers' training on pupils' achievement: The case ofelementary schools in France. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 252-279.
Broekkamp, H., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H.
(2002). Importance in Instructional Text: Teachers' and Students' Perceptions of Task Demands.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 260-271.

2
Bryk, A., & Thum., Y. M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on droppingout: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 353-383.
Caldas, S. J., Bankston, C. (1998). The inequality of separation: Racial composition ofschools and academic achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 533-557.
Cheung, K. C., et al. (1990). The analysis of multilevel data in educational research:Studies of problems and their solutions. International Journal of Educational Research, 14, 215319.
Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. G., Seroczynski, A. D., Tran, J. M.,
Hoffman, K. B., Ruiz, M. D. Jacquez, F., & Maschman, T. The development of multiple domainsof child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. ChildDevelopment, 72, 723-746.
Driessen, G., & Geert, W. J. M. (1997). Pre-reading and pre-arithmetic instruction in
infant education in the netherlands: A multilevel analysis approach. Early Child Developmentand Care, 134, 1-21.
Driessen, G., & Sleegers, P. (2000). Consistency of teaching approach and student
achievement: An empirical test. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 57-79.
Driessen, G. (2002). School composition and achievement in primary education: Alarge-scale multilevel approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 347-368.
Fielding, A. (1995). Institutional disparities in the cost effectiveness of GCE a-levelprovision: A multi-level approach. Education Economics, 3, 159-171.

3Fielding, A. (1998). Perspectives on performance indicators: GCE advanced level anddifferences between institution types in cost effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, 9, 218-231.
Fielding, A. (2002). Teaching groups as foci for evaluating performance in costeffectiveness of GCE advanced level provision: Some practical methodological innovations.
School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 225-246.
Fleming, C. B., Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., Haggerty, K. P., & Abbott, R. D.
Assessing the effects of a school-based intervention on unscheduled school transfers during
elementary school. Evaluation Review, 25, 655-679.
Fuller, B., Raudenbush, S. W., Wei, L. M., & Holloway, S. (1993). Can government
raise childcare quality? The influence of family demand poverty and policy. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 64, 255-278.
Garner, C. L., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1991). Neighborhood effects on educational
attainment: A multilevel analysis. Sociology of Education, 64, 251-262.
Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban
elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis.
Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 683-702.
Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationshipbetween teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17,807-818.

4
Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examinationof the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementaryschools. Elementary School Journal, 102, 3-17.
Goh, S. C., Youns, D. J., Fraser, & B. J. (1995). Psychosocial climate and student
outcomes in elementary mathematics classrooms: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Experimental
Education, 64, 29-40.
Goldstein, H., & Sammons, P. (1997). The influence of secondary and junior schools on
sixteen year examination performance: A cross-classified multilevel analysis. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8, 219-230.
Gray, J., et al. (1995). A multi-level analysis of school improvement: Changes in schools’
performance over time. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 97-114.
Goldschmidt, P., & Wang, J. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A
longitudinal multilevel analysis.
American Educational Research Journal, 36, 715-738.
Griffith, J. (2002). A multilevel analysis of the relation of school learning and social
environments to minority achievement in public elementary schools. Elementary School Journal,
102, 349-366.
Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). The assessment of principal performance: A
multilevel evaluation approach. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 11-28.
Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modelling student progress in studies of educationaleffectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 310-333.

5
Hofman, W. H. A. (1994). School effects on performance of minority pupils. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 26-44.
Hofman, W. H. A. (1995). Cross-level relationships within effective schools. School
Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 146-174.
Hser, Y. (1995). Drug treatment counselor practices and effectiveness: An examinationof literature and relevant issues in a multilevel framework. Evaluation Review, 19, 389-408.
Johnsrud, L. K., & Rosser, V. J. (2002). Faculty members' morale and their intention toleave: a multilevel explanation. Journal of Higher Education,73, 518-542.
Kendall, L. (1995). Contextualization of school examination results 1992. Educational
Research, 37, 123-139.
Kreft, I. G. G. (1993). Using multilevel analysis to assess school effectiveness: A studyof Dutch secondary schools. Sociology of Education, 66, 1-4-129.
Konu, A. I., Lintonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J. (2002). Evaluation of well-being in schools a multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being. School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, 13, p187-200
Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of theclassroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' comprehensive model ofeducational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 501-529.
Lee, V. E., & Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of highschool achievement. Sociology of Education, 62, 172-92.
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1990). Gender equity in teachers’ salaries: A multilevelapproach. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 57-81.

6Lee, V. E., Croninger, R. G., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Parental choice of schools and social
stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
16, 434-457.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., & Kong, C-K. (2002). Multilevel causal ordering of academic
self-concept and achievement: influence of language of instruction (English compared withChinese) for Hong Kong students. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 727-763.
Mellor, S., Paley, M. J., Holzworth, R. J. (1999). Fans' judgments about the 1994-95
major league baseball players' strike. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 59-87.
Mobley, C. (2001). The impact of community colleges on the school-to-work transition:
A multilevel analysis. Community College Review, 28, 1-30.
Mok, M., & Flynn, M. (1998). Effect of catholic school culture on students' achievementin the higher school certificate examination: A multilevel path analysis. Educational Psychology:
An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 18, 409-432.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness inmathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement
program (primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273-303.
Mullens, J. E., Murnone, R. J., & Willed, J. B. (1996). The contribution of training andsubject matter knowledge to teaching effectiveness: A multilevel analysis of longitudinalevidence from Belize. Comparative Education Review, 40, 139-157.
Naderi, A., & Mace, J. (2002). Education and Earnings: A multilevel analysis. A casestudy of the manufacturing sector in Iran. Economics of Education Review, 22, 143-56.

7Opdenakker, M-C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). effects of schools, teaching staff andclasses on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences
between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165-196.
Raudenbush, S. W. (1990). New evidence in the search for effective primary schools.
American Journal of Education, 98, 175-183.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Chan, W. (1993). Application of a hierarchial linear model to thestudy of adolescent deviance in an overlapping cohort design. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 61, 941-951.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Rowen, B., & Cheong, F. C. (1992). Contextual effects on theself-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.
Raudenbush, S. W., Rowen, B., & Cheong, F. C. (1993). Higher order instructional goals
in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research
Journal, 30, 523-553.
Raudenbush, S. W., Eamsukkawat, S., Di-Ibor, I., Kamali, M. & Taoklom, W. (1993).
On-the-job improvements in teacher competence: Policy Options and their effects on teaching
and learning in Thailand. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 279-297.
Raudenbush, S. W., Kidchanapanish, S., & Kong, J. J. (1991). The effects of preprimary
access and quality on educational achievement in Thailand. Comparative Education Review, 35,255-273.
Riddell, A. R. (1989). An alternative approach to the study of school effectiveness inthird world countries. Comparative Education Review, 33, 481-497.

8Rountree, P. W., & Land, K. C. (1996). Burglary victimization, perceptions of crime risk,and routine activities: A multilevel analysis across Seattle neighborhoods and census tracts.
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 147-180.
Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S. W., & Kang, S. J. (1991). Organizational design in highschools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99, 238-266.
Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis ofstudents and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (1993). The economic returns to college major,
quality and performance: A multilevel analysis of recent graduates. Economics of Education
Review, 12, 1-19.
St James-Roberts, I., & Plewis, I. (1996). Individual differences, daily fluctuations, anddevelopmental changes in amounts of infant waking, fussing, crying, feeding, and sleeping.
Child Development, 67, 2527-2540.
Sammons, P., et al. (1995). Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis ofprimary and secondary school effects on GCSE performance. School Effectiveness and School
Improvement, 6, 285-307.
Sammons, P., & Smees, R. (1998). Measuring pupil progress at key stage 1: Usingbaseline assessment to investigate value added. School Leadership & Management, 18, 389-407.
Schagen, I. (1994). Multilevel analysis of the key stage 1 national curriculum assessment
data in 1991 and 1992. Oxford Review of Education, 20, 163-171.
Schagen, I.,Kendall, L., & Sharp, C. (2002). Measuring the success of "Playing forSuccess." Educational Research Win, v44, 255-267.

9Tang, Y., (1997). School effectiveness in Taiwanese vocational education: A multi-levelanalysis. Education Economics, 5, 3-26.
Tsui, K. T., & Cheng, Y. C. (1999). School organizational health and teachercommitment: A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research andEvaluation (An International Journal on Theory and Practice), 5, 249-268.
Author(s):Tymms, P. (2001). A test of the big fish in a little pond hypothesis: An investigation into
the feelings of seven-year-old pupils in school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement,
12, 161-181.
van den Oord, E. J. C. G., & Van Rossem, R. (2002). Differences in first graders' school
adjustment: the role of classroom characteristics and social structure of the group. Journal of
School Psychology, 40, 369-394.
Webster, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (2000). Accounting for variation in science andmathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of Australian data; Third International
Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11,339-360
Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student
academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10, 20 pages.
Wong, A. F. L., Young, D. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1997). A multilevel analysis of learning
environments and student attitudes. Educational Psychology: An International Journal ofExperimental Educational Psychology, 17, 449-468.
Young, D. J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science andmathematics: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 386-418