Text and images © named author/artist, n.paradoxa.
No reproduction without © permission of n.paradoxa and author/artist.

Bodies Unlimited
A decade of subRosa’s art practice
subRosa
subRosa’s performative art practice has long focused on
examining the conditions of female bodies in the production
and consumption of medical and biotechnologies in the
globalized fertility industry. To date, the so-called biotech
revolution represents an unprecedented intervention – at both
micro and macro levels – into the reproduction, manipulation,and control of all life forms. As feminist artists, subRosa
situates our own bodies and labor in relation to an inquiry
about the “post-human” body that manifests simultaneously
as the distributed body, medicalized body, socially networked
body, cyborg body, citizen body, virtual body, laboring body,soldier body, animal body, and gestating body. We ask: How
do we imagine ourselves as resistant, activist artists in these
new global bio-scenarios? Can our work propose feminist
ethics for post-human bodies and material life?
For the past forty years or more, leading feminist
scientists, scholars, and activists, including Evelyn Fox
Keller, Donna Haraway, Sandra Harding, and Vandana
Shiva,1 have interrogated the disciplines of science from afeminist perspective. They have made crucial incursions into
the practices, methods, and philosophies of life-science,16

biotechnology, genetics, bio-politics, and bio-ethics.
Concurrently, feminist artists and art historians haveprofoundly challenged how art is made, taught, and interpreted;and feminist art has strongly influenced and changed themainstream art world. Feminist artists have activated new art
practices that often employ research into non-art fields suchas sociology, anthropology, psychology, sexuality, medicine,and gender studies. They have introduced new subject matter,methods and content including interrogations of emerging
biogenetic-sciences, genetically engineered life, newreproductive technologies, environmental studies, and animalstudies; and pioneered cultural forms and methods including
participatory, relational, and social art practices, cyberfeminist
art, and pedagogical public performance. subRosa has been aleader in bringing such new performative, participatory, andrelational art practices to bear on a feminist critique of
biotechnology, Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART),2
eugenics, genetic engineering and patenting of life materials.
In this article, subRosa briefly describes the history anddevelopment of our practice, and presents a selection of our
projects and performances.
n.paradoxa Vol.28

A brief history of subRosa
As part of a 1998 artist residency at the Studio for Creative
Inquiry at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), visiting artist
Faith Wilding initiated a feminist reading group to research
the topic of ‘Sex and Gender in the Biotech Century’. 3 This
heterogeneous group composed of graduate students, faculty,
and artists met regularly over sumptuous brunches, to discuss
feminist writings about gender, race, reproduction and female
labor in relation to the bio-sciences, and the digital imaging
and new media technologies that were coming into use in
the burgeoning computer science fields, and electronic art
practices. The Studio for Creative Inquiry was founded tofoster interdisciplinary work between the arts, sciences, andnew media technologies at a time when both “new mediaart” and “bio art” were beginning to be hot trends in theacademic art world, yet few artists were bringing a critical,
feminist discourse, and audience engagement to the complex
questions raised by emerging bio-tech sciences. Membersof the reading group were also reading and thinking about
how cyberfeminism might relate to historical feminist art
practices, and to engaged activist work with socio/politicalissues involving gendered and raced bodies. Thus we readand discussed articles on the tactics and strategies of the
Feminist Women’s Health Movement, ACT UP, feminist
grass-roots activism in immigrant rights and labor
movements, reproductive rights, anti-war, environmentalorganizing, and the like.
It was no accident that subRosa began at Carnegie
Mellon, an elite private university that prides itself on its
leadership in research and development of computer sciencefields, as well as business, engineering and robotic
technologies – it early acquired “Andrew” one of the world’s
first supercomputers – and is also home to a highly regarded
School of Art where Andy Warhol was a student. CMU isalso a recipient of major DARPA funding for research inmilitary and space robotics, and Artificial Intelligence.4 Someinteresting collaborations between (mostly male) art androbotics students and faculty were already underway at CMU
in the 1990s, but there was a marked lack of feminist
discussion and consciousness about women’s involvementwith technologies in this high-tech school.5
Just prior to the formation of the reading group, Wildingand Hyla Willis – a professional graphic designer and art
student at CMU – collaborated on SmartMom, a net-art
project that detourned appropriated images and texts about
NASA-engineered cyborg bodies and the Smart T-shirt
n.paradoxa Vol.28

technology developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology
for remote medical surveillance and treatment of soldiers
wounded in the battle field.6 Inspired by Haraway’s
theorizing of the cyborg as a generative, feminist post-humanfigure, some of the artists in the reading group self-organized
as a working group interested in collaborating on activist art
projects about the subjects we were researching. 7 The group
selected the name ‘subRosa’, which sounded deliciously
clandestine, for our as yet unspecified activities, andannounced ourselves in an under-the-radar intervention“cellular mutations” which we sneakily distributed in red
plastic biohazard baggies at The Next Five Minutes 3 Festival
in Amsterdam in 1999. Our founding manifesta declared:
subRosa’s name honors feminist pioneers in art,
activism, labor, politics, and science: Rosa Bonheur, Rosa
Luxemburg, Rosie the Riveter, Rosa Parks, RosieFranklin.
subRosa is a reproducible cyberfeminist cell of
cultural researchers committed to combining art,
activism, and politics to explore and critique theintersections of the new information and biotechnologies
in women’s bodies, lives, and work.
subRosa produces artworks, activist campaigns andprojects, sneak attacks, publications, media interventions,and public forums that make visible the effects of theinterconnections of technology, gender, and difference;
feminism and global capital; new bio and medical
technologies and women’s health; and the changed
conditions of labor and reproduction for women in the
integrated circuit.
subRosa practices a situational embodied feminist
politics nourished by conviviality, self-determination, andthe desire for affirmative alliances and coalitions.
It was an ambitious program, but since that firstintervention, subRosa has never looked back, although we’ve
undergone difficult changes in our group’s composition, been
separated geographically, and always struggle for time andresources to complete our many projects. Since the late 1990s,
the landscape for artists who work collaboratively haschanged dramatically, but when subRosa first began to work
together it was still something of a novelty in mainstream
academia and the art-world, and we found ourselves called
on repeatedly to explain and justify our collaborative structure
to funding organizations, granting bodies, hiring committees,
curators, and art historians. Luckily, our first significant arts
grant came from Creative Capital, which turned out to be
17subRosa and Wu Tsang Yes Species in Cyberfem. Feminisms on theElectronic Landscape Espai d’art contemporani de Castelló (EACC),
Spain, 20 Oct 2006

very open and helpful when we explained the nature of ourcollaborative work and allowed us to apply as a group, rather
than as individuals. Even today, most artists with academic
jobs who work collaboratively still have to struggle to defend
their practices – and themselves – as worthy of advanced
academic status and recognition when it comes to hiring,promotion and tenure.
subRosa’s current members, Willis and Wilding,communicate frequently through email and phone calls, andwe hold occasional intensive working retreats in one or theother’s city of residence. As well, we use the time when we’retraveling together to brainstorm and make plans for future
projects and talk over what we’ve done. Apart from importantfunding by Creative Capital early on, as well as several statearts grants from Pennsylvania, our project funding comesfrom lecture and exhibition honoraria, and materials andtravel funds from inviting institutions. Both Willis andWilding support our-selves with full-time teaching jobs andalso use faculty research and project money to fund subRosa
projects and publications.
The subject matter of subRosa’s projects has expanded
well beyond our initial feminist critique of the development
and marketing of ART, and ranges widely over a number oflinked biotech and bio-political feminist issues. For example,
our research about the lucrative global surrogacy and fertility
tourism industry – and the eugenic thinking and “genetic
18

subRosa Can You See Us Now? Ya Nos Pueden Ver? in The
Interventionists: Art in the Social Sphere curated by Nato Thompson,
MASS MoCA, North Adams, MA, May 2004-April 2005

essentialism” inherent in these industries – led to ourparticipatory performance U-GEN-A-CHIX or Why are
Women Like Chickens, and Chickens Like Women, which
compared the use of women and chickens as producers ofgenerative tissues such as eggs and embryonic stem cells forthe global biomedical and ART market. 8 A version of thisperformance commissioned by the City of Women Festival
in Ljubljana, Slovenia (2009), also incorporated findings ofour research about the rapid growth in fertility tourism andthe increasing incursion of genetically modified crops inEastern European and Balkan countries. Can You See Us
Now? Ya Nos Pueden Ver? was a large, interactive installationin the 9-month long exhibition, The Interventionists, at Mass
MoCA in North Adams. 9 We collaborated with artist Wu
Tsang on Yes Species, a performance and book project abouttransgender and Intersex for an exhibition at NGBK Gallery
in Berlin. 10 Inspired by the work of our friends and comradesin the Ultrared collective, we held a two-week artist residency
project, A Week With|Out Women at WHW’s Galerija Nova
in Zagreb, which we structured as a collective inquiry into
n.paradoxa Vol.28

subRosa U-Gen-A-Chix / Why are Women Like Chickens, and Chickens, Like
Women? in City of Women Festival, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 13 Oct 2008

subRosa Biopower Unlimited! 23rd Annual New Media & Art
Festival, Bowling Green State University, Ohio, October, 2002

the conditions and status of several different groups of womenin Croatia including university students, queer activists,
women’s studies scholars, and performance artists. 11
subRosa frequently gives lectures, seminars, andparticipatory workshops in the US and internationally. As well,
we often collaborate with students and faculty from Women’sStudies, Life Sciences, Visual and media arts departments, aswell as various community groups, local artists and art
institutions, to organize performances and events. subRosa
also participates in international conferences, art festivals andvideo screenings, and has published a variety of books,
booklets, essays, zines, DVDs, mapping projects, and posters.
Most of our projects are initiated by an invitation to
perform or lecture at a specific festival, exhibition, event,school, or cultural institution. We try to match what we areinterested in researching to the situation, site, and conditionsof the inviting venue. Productive performances have takenplace in colleges and universities when we do not identify
ourselves as artists, but, sometimes costumed in our official
white lab coats, we have insinuated ourselves successfully

into one of the public student gathering spaces such as theschool cafeteria, or the student union, where students areused to seeing info-tables, vendors and proselytizers of all
kinds – since students are a huge marketing group for the
military, various political and social organizations, andelectronic and technological gadgets. For example, a
successful subRosa intervention took place at a ‘Campus
Technology Fair’ where we represented a fictive entity,
Biopower Unlimited, and set up shop among the many otherbooth displays during Freshman week, with a bank ofcomputers programmed to test attendants’ “bio-power” byanalyzing the every-day uses of their time and labor. It wasinteresting – and perversely entertaining – to witness thestudents’ perplexity when trying to figure out what we were“selling”. Many took our on-line bio-power “test” only tofind that they were spending all of their waking hours
working for someone else, and had virtually no “free” timeof their own for family, pleasure, play, or socializing. 12
Over the years, subRosa has developed situational andsited forms of trans-disciplinary performance that createn.paradoxa Vol.28

19

open-ended, discursive environments in which participants
engage with objects, images, texts, technologies, and learning
experiences, and interact with each other and the artists. We
strive to create a space of collective inquiry where participants
can directly experience and speak about the social andmaterial effects of the new digital and biotechnologies on
their lives.
subRosa engages in many forms of research andinvestigates new models of interdisciplinary knowledge
generation, dissemination and representation in the arts,
sciences, and humanities. We ask: what counts as collective
knowledge production and who are the knowledge producers
in a democracy? What are the criteria for ethical, sociallyengaged scientific and artistic work? What cultural and social
mechanisms promote such citizen knowledge production,
and what apparatuses of authority, specialization, or
privatization counter the sharing of important contemporary
knowledge? We believe that artists can introduce audiences
to scientific processes within a critical context that questions
the effects bio-science has in real life. Emerging biotechnologies are creating changes in labor conditions forscientists, lab-workers, medical technicians, doctors andnurses. They also create new social relations andsubjectivities, and new ways of using and controlling
everyone’s bodies and bio-power. As feminists, we also study
the particular effects on women’s and children’s bodies andlives. For example, a child born through the use of Assisted
Reproductive Technologies could have four mothers: a) the“commissioning” mother; b) the egg-donor mother; c) the
surrogate gestational mother; and d) the social mother/parental mother who rears the child. Our work explores theconsequences and meaning of such new subjectivities andkinship relations, as well as examining actual embodied
processes such as the new divisions of gestational labor, thephysical and emotional effects of the process of “assisted
reproduction” and the troubling issues of eugenic control ofreproduction. Our projects attempt to show how and why
the new digital media- and bio-technologies affect everyone– directly or indirectly, whether “wired” or not – because
they are embedded in every aspect of life: material and service
labor, immaterial knowledge and intellectual work, creativeand cultural production, food production, education,communication, reproduction, medical treatment, and global
commodity production and exchange. And they have a
profound impact on how we conceptualize and represent our“human-ness”. In fact, the very idea of an “essential
20

subRosa Cloning Culture LASALLE-SIA College of Arts, Singapore,
10-13 Jan 2003

humanness” has been called into question by the new lifeforms, bodies, and conditions these technologies produce.
These are exciting, and disturbing, questions for subRosaand engaged artists and activists to confront and grapple with.

subRosa Projects
As Vandana Shiva suggests, ‘The new biotechnologies
reproduce the old patriarchal divisions of activity/
passivity, culture/nature. These dichotomies are then used
as instruments of capitalist patriarchy to colonize theregeneration of plants and humans. Only by decolonizing
generation can the activity and creativity of women andnature in a non-patriarchal mold be reclaimed.’ 13
In 2003, subRosa held a series of presentations andconversations in Singapore about that country’s leading
scientific developments in Assisted Reproductive Technologies(ART), animal cloning, and embryonic stem cell technologies
under the title Cloning Cultures in Singapore. During our twoweek stay, we observed scientists in a primate cloning lab;attended an informational sales seminar at a commercial
umbilical cord blood bank; and visited the obstetrics andmaternal care wards and neonatal intensive care units (ICU)
of a large public women’s hospital. We interviewed
reproductive scientists, doctors, nurses, women patients, andresearchers in these facilities. As well, we conducted a threeday workshop called Cloning Cultures with art students fromLASALLE-SIA College of the Arts, and a seminar with aclass from the National University of Singapore taught by
Irina Aristarkhova, a feminist scholar and professor teachingcourses in feminism and new media arts in both schools.
The workshop at LASALLE began with a simple blackboard
n.paradoxa Vol.28

subRosa Cell Track: Mapping the Appropriation of Life Materials,‘Soft Power: Arte eta teknologiak aro biopolitikoan’ Bilbao, Spain,
1 Oct - 6 Nov 2009lecture on the processes of cloning, cell-division, and cellculture, and explained how “genetically identical” newanimals and plants could be produced by this method.
subRosa showed a slide-show of photos taken in down-town
Singapore’s stores, restaurants, and sidewalks the day before,
which demonstrated how cloning has entered the cultural
imaginary in the form of everyday commodities, clothing,
toys, and foods. We then divided the students into five groups
led by a subRosa member, and each group took on a different
project connected to cloning, genetics, eugenics, andbiotechnology as they pertained to local issues such as water
purification, growing genetically modified crops, or charting
school children’s growth and intelligence. In the course of
three days, the students produced wonderfully engaging
works that clearly visualized the social and cultural fears
and desires connected to cloning and genetic engineering. 14
A year later, our Singaporean research on the biological,
socio-economic and political issues surrounding embryonicstem cells, reproduction, and cloning technologies led to thedevelopment of two new subRosa projects. The first, Cell
Track: Mapping the Appropriation of Life Materials (2009,2008, 2004) was both an installation, and a web site thatexamined the privatization and patenting of human, animal,and plant genomes within the context of a history of eugenics
in the US. 15 In the Chicago version of the installation, alarge anatomical drawing of a human figure combining maleand female body parts was superimposed on a wall painted
with Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion map of the world. 16
Affixed to relevant parts of the figure, were large red dots
bearing texts that highlighted examples of the patenting ofn.paradoxa Vol.28

human biological material ranging from specific genesequences to one man’s entire genome. These dots also noteda few significant examples in which ownership rights havebeen contested or overturned. The figure and map werehorizontally bisected by a timeline delineating key momentsin the history of the patenting of life materials, as well as
important statements or actions critical of this form ofownership. The overlapping territories of the bodily and landmasses, superimposed with brief case studies andcontestational histories, provided a graphic visualization of
the economic and geographic implications of the human stem
cell industry. A laptop installed at one end of the time line
allowed visitors to further explore some of the source material
that informed the project, as well as critical and artistic texts
by subRosa. This material was incorporated into a web site(http://refugia.net/celltrack/) that provided actual examplesof the Licensing and Commercialization Agreementsscientists must sign to obtain cell lines, and accounts ofresearchers “harvesting” genetic intellectual property fromwomen, children, cancer patients, and indigenous peoples.
An essay on the site takes a closer look at the rhetoric usedby genetics industries that refer to stem cell technologies as
the “new gold standard” for medical research. An animationin the form of a children’s storybook gave voice to a rebellious‘Stem Cell That Wanted to be Different’. Site visitors could
also read a statement drafted at the 2002 World Social Forumin Brazil, ‘The Treaty Initiative to Share the Genetic
Commons’. Finally, the “gold rush” of recent mergers
between fiscal giants in the pharmaceutical, agricultural, andbiotech industries were also documented.
Cell Track draws attention to the increasing separation
between the bodies that produce stem cells and genetic
material, and the medical and pharmaceutical “products”
derived from them. Maternal body cells and tissues like eggs,
placentas, fetuses, and umbilical cord blood have become
valuable “raw materials” mined for stem cell technologies.
This development has opened the way for corporate scienceto profit from the manipulation and control of life – bypatenting and licensing DNA sequences, engineered genes,
stem cell lines, transgenic organisms, and the like. Cell Trackraises the need to found an activist, feminist-inspired
collective research and resource lab, available to amateurs,
artists, independent scientists, and non-profit researchers
conducting experimental and contestational public healthresearch and shared knowledge production about
controversial biotechnologies.
21

Epidermic! DIY Cell Lab (2009, 2005) was a participatory
performance alongside Cell Track, intended to familiarize
gallery visitors with the scientific processes and concepts ofrecombinant DNA and stem cell technologies that underlie
genetic engineering. 17 subRosa set up an amateur science
performance and experimental lab in the Betty Rymer art
gallery. Working with a scientist and using easily obtained
science materials, we duplicated the classic 1973 experimentthat first produced anti-biotic resistant recombinant DNA.
By completing the final “transformation” step in the gallery,
we were able to give visitors an understanding of some of
the actual lab processes by which E.coli bacteria were
genetically altered to make them resistant to antibiotics.
Viewers could practice the technique of “streaking” the agarcoated surface of a Petri dish with cell cultures, and observe
E.coli cells being transformed. Visitors also watched a shortlecture demonstration about adult and embryonic stem cellcloning, and learned how to make yogurt in their own
kitchens as an example of DIY cell culture. At another tablein the gallery, visitors cut and pasted xeroxed historical andcontemporary drawings and images of recombinant processes
from alchemy to gene splicing, into collages that represented
their own fears, desires and understandings of recombinantscience. These were projected onto a large screen next to thelab-like setting of the DNA experiment in progress. Thus
visitors were exposed to at least three different ways in whichscience can be visually represented, and got a taste of publicknowledge production in action. The “wet lab” componentof DIY Epidermic! brought information and discussion aboutcell transformation, recombinant DNA, and tissue culture
experiments into a public space of discourse in the context
of the research performed and exhibited in the Cell Trackinstallation. Transgressing the sanctity of what and where a“lab” should be located, and who should or can engage inscientific processes allowed for the different kind of public
inquiry and perception of the ownership issues which
subRosa wished to address in these two projects.
International Markets of Flesh (IMF) (2009, 2005, 2003)
was an audience-participatory performance and collective
mapping of global trafficking in human organs and tissues.18
The first iteration of IMF took place on the altar of aseventeenth century converted convent church turned art
space, near the vast central market of Mexico City. Throughparticipatory activities, demonstrations, & manipulation oflife-size organ sculptures, the audience learned about thegrowing international demand for transplantable organs and22

Top: subRosa International Markets of Flesh in Arte Nuevo
InteractivA’05 Mérida, Mexico, 25 June 2005. Bottom: XIInternational Performance Art Festival: Out of Focus, ExTeresa Arte
Actual, Mexico City, 11 July 2004

tissues, and the political, social, and medical consequences
these demands create. Participants wrote personal stories andrumors about organ harvesting and trade on a large Dymaxion
world map, and affixed organ stickers to relevant spots. The
visual accumulation of facts, fiction, and testimony
effectively demonstrated the dominant flows of the fleshmarket worldwide, with demand generally coming from theNorth, and supply from the South. Performers and audience
members also discussed changing ideas about the value ofhuman life in the age of genetically engineered, globally
distributed, and patented human body parts; filled in a form
estimating the net worth of their body parts and labor, andreceived a ‘Certificate of Flesh Worth’. We repeated the IMF
performance, and further developed it, for InteractivA, acultural festival held in the Yucatan city of Merida a year
later. For this performance local teenage schoolchildren
n.paradoxa Vol.28

assisted subRosa, while their families, as well as international
artists and tourists, participated as the audience. Here ouremphasis was on acts of exchange, gift economies, and thedifferent ways in which value is created and distributed: anorgan for money, the “gift of life” for family survival, theexchange of knowledge for power.

Seminars and Workshops
subRosa is working on designing new pedagogies thatcombine women’s studies, art, and science studies. Thus weoften engage in participatory forms of inquiry and knowledge
creation such as lectures, seminars, and workshops. For
example, in February 2011, we were invited to conduct aclass in a graduate Women’s Studies seminar, ‘Engineering
Life and Ethics’ taught by Drs. Deboleena Roy, and Sara
Giordano, at Emory University in Atlanta. Our topic,
Feminist Scientists and Artists Interrogate Synthetic Biology,
was grounded in Sandra Harding’s premise that a feminist
science that takes gender into account, posits a different
world, and imagines a science built on different social
relations than patriarchal science.19 We were interested inhearing what the students might have to say about strategies
and tactics for “becoming feminist scientists” and what itmeans to do science from a feminist point of view. Eachstudent first gave a brief summary of her/his research topic
and field of study and voiced a central question or concern.
subRosa then presented and discussed several “bio-art”
projects that exemplified some of the ways in which
performative and participatory art practices can initiate public
discussion about troubling aspects of bio-genetic
technologies. We also posed a number of questions to theclass to try to tease out troubling issues regarding the “new”
biological and material science of synthetic biology, forexample: Do synthetic biologists and bio-artists have carte
blanche to manipulate life materials, eradicate species
boundaries, and change the ontology of existing organisms?
In other words, in what ways does matter “matter”? Are
there limits and boundaries to human interventions into life
processes? If “life” is synthetically produced, will random
bio-diversity, mutation, and difference be obliterated or
disrespected? Since synthetic DNA needs living cells ormolecules [so-called wetware] to “make life”, does thatchange its ethical status? What are the urgencies andpossibilities for feminist science pedagogy now? It wasinteresting to see how closely our questions coincided withthe students’ concerns and research. We were excited to learnn.paradoxa Vol.28

that the class requires students to spend a minimum of five
hours in a lab over the course of the semester working“bench-side” with ‘graduate students, postdoctoral fellows
and/or faculty who conduct synthetic biology researchor genetic engineering experiments in their lab.’ 20 The
method of interdisciplinary “bench-side” work presentsinteresting possibilities for feminist artists, ethicists, andscientists to develop new methods of teaching and “doing”
science and art together. subRosa found this class to be
exciting and generative, and hopes to refer to the model toorganize a feminist science and art study and action group in
the coming years.
Bodies Unlimited! A subRosa Workshop for ‘SoftPowerII’, was held at Sala Rekalde, a cenrally located public art
gallery and hot spot for contemporary art close to the
Guggenheim, Bilbao, in November 2010.21 Organized bycurator and journalist Maria Ptqk, ‘SoftPower II’ was a series
of week-long seminars, workshops, and exhibitions with theoverall title of ‘Art and Technologies in the Age of Biopolitics’. Our goals for the workshop were to help participants
gain a basic understanding of what is meant by recombinantDNA, genetic engineering, intellectual property andpatenting of life. Further, we wanted to examine the ways inwhich capitalism and patriarchy become naturalized in the
production of scientific knowledge, and to ask: How do we
produce new knowledge together using our own stories andexperiences, and mix things up to produce new questions
and new working methods?
Not knowing what we were facing in terms ofparticipants, space, available equipment, and language orcultural differences, we stuck to some basic processes andexercises through which we hoped to raise consciousness
and questions about the big issues we were introducing. The
challenge was to merge live art practices, everyday life, andspecialist and amateur fields of research and practice. The
five-day interdisciplinary workshop included eight female
students and one male student, who represented a wide rangeof disciplines including fine arts, social sciences, media art,
digital technologies, scientific, and medical fields. Since acommon language was a problem, we divided each day into
several different experiential activities that included visualpresentations and discussions of many artist projects, creating
and keeping shared lab-books, observing/doing basic
biological processes that are often used in biotechnology
such as fermentation methods, culturing cells and bacteria,
growing molds and yeasts. We performed a simple DNA
23

subRosa Bodies Unlimited workshop and exhibition Soft Power II
Sala Rekalde, Bilbao, Spain, 2-6 November 2010

extraction from strawberries, and made high-powered
magnifiers from web cams. We organized a three-hour “drift”(using the method of the Situationist derive) through local
sites of biological production and consumption–
supermarkets, farmer’s markets, hair and massage salons,street food vendors, urban gardens, etc. The workshop
culminated in a public exhibition of our experiments, and aperformance of DNA extraction with the audience.
Surprisingly, a wide variety of people showed up, andenergetically engaged in discussion around the subject of
the experiments and objects. Although we were quite happy
with the outcome of the workshop, it is frustrating that one
never knows what the long-term reverberations of such hit
and run projects are. We are always sowing seeds randomly,
but rarely seeing what comes up.
Throughout the world farmers, scientists, scholars,
activists, artists, and ordinary citizens are making it a common
cause to contest capitalist control of the world’s genetic
heritage, biopower, and traditional knowledges. At stake forconcerned citizens is the contestation of corporate biotech’s
bid for the monopoly, ownership and control of all life
materials, icluding new biological organisms, and genetic
24

heritage that, up to the early 1970s, had been considered acommon good and not patentable. subRosa is interested inengaging in a collective inquiry with feminist scientists,
theorists, scholars, students, artists, and practicioners, for the
purpose of developing contestational, interdisciplinary, andpedagogical practices, and introducing new feminist researchmodels and methods. We believe that the acceleration ofsynthetic biology research, the creation of so-called biomass
and synthetic life organisms, and other new ways of “makinglife” in the laboratory, calls feminist scientists and artists togo beyond a critique of science to create new science
practices, methods, and working ethics that specificallyaddress the challenges of synthetic biology and the ethicaland embodied issues it raises.

Notes
1. See Sandra Harding The Science Question in Feminism (Ithaca andLondon: Cornell University Press, 1986); Donna Haraway
Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™Feminism
and Technoscience (New York and London: Routledge, 1997); Vandana
Shiva Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge (Boston: SouthEnd Press, 1997); Suzanne Holland, Karen Lebacqz and Laurie
Zoloth(eds.) The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics,
and Public Policy(Cambridge and London: MIT Press, 2001) and Judith
Butler Undoing Gender (New York and London: Routledge, 2004).
2. See subRosa ‘Stolen Rhetoric: The Appropriation of Choice by ART
Enterprises’ in Maria Fernandez, Michelle Wright, Faith Wilding (eds.)
Domain Errors! Cyberfeminist Practices (New York: Autonomedia, 2003);
see also ‘The Economies of Art’ n.paradoxa vol.8 (2001) pp. 59-64
3. Participants in initial subRosa meetings, discussions, and projects:
Emily de Araujo, Krista Connerly, Steffi Domike, Maria Fernandez,
Camilla Griggers, Christina Hung, Carolina Loyola, Laleh Mehran,n.paradoxa Vol.28

Elizabeth Monoian, Ann Rosenthal, Suzie Silver, Lucia Sommer, Rebecca

especially Adeline Kuh, Margaret Tan, and Dr. Sheryl Vanderpol. The

Vaughan, Faith Wilding, Hyla Willis, Michelle M. Wright.

project was funded in part by a generous grant from the Creative Capital

4. DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, theFoundation, NYC.

research arm of the military www.darpa.mil

15. Cell Track was exhibited at BioDifference: The Political Ecology

5. For example, Simon Penny’s classes in ‘Gizmology’ produced some

Biennale of Electronic Arts, Lawrence Wilson Gallery, Univ. of Westerninteresting cross-over projects between art and robotics students. In theAustralia, Perth, Sept-Oct 2004; and at YOUgenics 3 Betty Rymer

1990s Faith Wilding was a member of Old Boys Network, a cyberfeminist

Gallery, Art Institute of Chicago, Dec 2004-Feb2005, curated by Ryangroup in Europe, and also collaborated on some bio-tech projects andGriffis. see http://refugia.net/celltrack/

publications with CAE (Critical Art Ensemble)

16. We used Buckminster Fuller’s Dymaxion map because it reverses

6. For the Smart T shirt see www.gtwm.gatech.edu/gtwm.html

the locations of North and South that we are used to in world maps, and7. The project group evolved into a “core” subRosa group that worked

renders the comparative size of the continents more accurately.

together until 2004; it included Steffi Domike, Christina Hung, Laleh

17. Epidermic! DIY Cell Labtook place Feb. 18, 2005 during

Mehran, Lucia Sommer, Hyla Willis, and Faith Wilding. subRosa never

YOUGenics 3

had formalized membership criteria or elections of members. It is

18. International Markets of Flesh, XI International Performance Art

interesting to note that though the words “collaboration” or “collective”

Festival Out of Focus, ExTeresa Arte Actual, Mexico City, 11 July 2004.

do not occur in the subRosa founding manifesto, the current members

Arte Nuevo InteractivA ’05 curated by Raul Balanquet, Patio Centralof subRosa, Hyla Willis and Faith Wilding, think of ourselves as

del Centro Cultural Olimpio, Mérida, Mexico, 25 June 2005 (catalogue).

collaborators, and of subRosa as a collective.Our current website

19. Sandra Harding The Science Question in Feminism (Ithaca anddescribes subRosa as a collective, and we talk about subRosa’s body of

London: Cornell University Press, 1986) p. 243 and ff

work as collectively produced. For more history, and to download

20. Re-phrased from the class syllabus

publications go to www.cyberfeminism.net

21. The first part of Soft Power I took place in 2009 in Vitoria-

8. First U-Gen-A-Chix performance, YOUGenics2: Exploring the Social

Gasteiz,Spain thanks to the collaboration of Proyecto Amarika. see

Implications of Genetic Technologies was curated by Ryan Griffis,

www.amarika.org/softpower/

Southwest Missouri State University, Springfield, 2 Oct 2003. Performed
as Express Choice, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 7 Nov 2005.
9. Can You See Us Now? ¿Ya Nos Pueden Ver? in The Interventionists:

10. Yes Species ‘Intersex 1-0-1 Festival’ Neue Gesellschaft für Bildende

Why not order n.paradoxa
for your library or institution?

Kunst (NGBK), Berlin, June 17, 2005 (catalog). Also shown in Cyberfem.

Price for annual subscription or any 2 Volumes

Art in the Social Sphere curated by Nato Thompson, MASS MoCA,
North Adams, MA, May 2004-April 2005 (catalogue)

Feminisms on the Electronic Landscape curated by Ana MartínezCollado, Espai d’art contemporani de Castelló (EACC), Spain (20 Oct
2006)
11. A Week With | Out Women Artist residency (at WHW’s GalerijaNova) & performance (at Student Center Club, Teater &TD), Zagreb,
Croatia, 31 May-8 June 2008
12. Biopower Unlimited! ‘23rd Annual New Media & Art Festival’Bowling Green State University, Ohio, October, 2002
13 Vandana Shiva Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge(1997) p. 45
14 subRosa’s Singapore residency and ‘Cloning Cultures’ workshop were
hosted by LASALLE-SIA College of the Arts, with additionalsponsorship from the National University of Singapore’s Cyberarts
Programme. Special thanks to Gunalan Nadarajan, then Dean of
LASALLE-SIA; Dr. Irina Aristarkhova, Assistant Professor ofCommunications (NUS); and all our Singaporean collaborators,
n.paradoxa Vol.28

Institutions in UK & Europe only £32
Institutions in US/ Canada/ Rest of World US $72
Institutional orders accepted by fax, email or post.
Payments following invoice by cheque/postal orderto ‘KT press’, by credit card or bank transfer .
n.paradoxa can also be ordered through the following
library subscription agents:
Swets Blackwell and EBSCO
or place your own institutional order onlineat www.ktpress.co.uk
Back issues also available.
4 volumes £56 (UK & Europe)
US $124 (USA/ RoW)
Post orders to: KT press, 38 Bellot Street, London,
SE10 OAQ, UK or Tel/Fax +44 (0) 208 858 3331
Registered in London Co. No. 3492334
Credit card subscriptions accepted by phone or fax
From late 2011, PDFs of articles in n.paradoxa will become
available for sale online and electronic subscriptions will become
available. Go to www.ktpress.co.uk for more details.
25