Summary of information available in Japan concerning thecontamination of foodstuffs by the radionuclides persistingin the environment after the Fukushima accident
13 July 2012

More than a year after the Fukushima Dai-ichi accident occurred on 11 March 2011, IRSN continues
to periodically collect and analyse the data published in Japan relating to the contamination of
the terrestrial environment, and notably of the foodstuffs produced in the areas affected by theaccident.
On the whole, the results of the first half of 2012 show a significant improvement for many
categories of foodstuffs (notably vegetables, livestock meat and milk) compared with the spring of
2011, but significant caesium-134 and caesium-137 concentrations are still regularly measured insome types of products: shiitake mushrooms, wild plant shoots (bamboo, Aralia, koshiabura andfiddleheads), game meat (mainly boars), freshwater fish and some marine species caught along thecoast near to the damaged plant, etc. These foodstuffs are occasionally found to exceed the sales
and consumption standards, and this occurs more frequently since these standards were tightenedon 1 April 2012. This has led the Japanese authorities to maintain or even increase the sales andconsumption restrictions for the products and territories concerned.
IRSN therefore recommends maintaining a certain degree of caution regarding the consumption of
the following foodstuffs:- Wild plants and boar meat: these products come from a forest environment, where nothingis done to reduce the contamination;- Shiitake mushrooms: the restrictions are widened daily, and the districts concerned arefurther and further away from the Fukushima prefecture.
- Fish (marine and freshwater), the contamination levels of which regularly and constantly
exceed the standards.
Care should be taken regarding the origin and, where appropriate, the measured contaminationlevels of these foodstuffs. In general, a varied diet (particularly in terms of its origin) is
recommended in order to effectively reduce internal contamination via ingestion.
In view of the long life of the radioactive caesium in the Japanese environment, maintaining
regular monitoring of agricultural or wild products is justified if the quality of the foodstuffs
consumed in Japan or exported is to be ensured, as the contamination levels will decrease only
slowly.

1/18

REMINDER OF THE GENERAL LEVEL OF CONTAMINATION IN THE
TERRESTRIAL ENVIRONMENT IN JAPAN FOLLOWING THE FUKUSHIMAACCIDENT
IRSN report 2012-01 (“Fukushima, one year later – Initial analyses of the accident and its
consequences”), which was published on 12 March 2012, contains a detailed description of thecurrently-available data on the environmental contamination in Japan. It states in particular thatthe terrestrial environment in Japan is durably contaminated by two radionuclides - caesium-134
and caesium-137 - which now constitute almost all of the residual contamination resulting from thenuclear accident. This contamination consists of a superficial deposit that, because of thephysicochemical properties of caesium, should remain relatively immobile except in rainwater runoff (transported in the water) and the re-suspension of wind-borne dust; these are only minor andgradual transport processes, however, and they have not significantly changed the overall
distribution of radioactive caesium deposits, which are mapped increasingly accurately (see maps in
Figure 1) in the successive measurement campaigns that still continue today.

Deposits of
Cs + 134Cs(in thousands of
Bq/m²)
137

Deposits of
Cs + 134Cs

137(in kBq/m²)

Figure 1 – Maps of caesium-134+137 deposits in Japan (surface activity relating to 5 November2011). Right: the north-east of Honshū island. Left: a radius of 80 km around the Fukushima
Dai-ichi plant (source: “Results of the Fourth Airborne Monitoring Survey by MEXT” publishedon 16 December 2011)
At the end of June 2012, 97% of the caesium-137 and 65% of the caesium-134 originally deposited at
the time of the accident still remains as a result of the respective rates of radioactive decay;
approximately 59% of the deposits’ remaining radioactivity consists of caesium-137, while the rest
consists of caesium-134.
These residual deposits help to maintain the significant external exposure doses of the people
living in the contaminated areas. As a result, the people living in areas that received the largest

2/18

deposits were evacuated in 2011, from the 20 km-radius “restricted area” around the damaged
nuclear power plant (NPP) and from the “deliberate evacuation area” located more than 20 km to
the north-west of the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP (the Katsurao, Iitate and Namie districts, and part of
the Kawamata and Minamisoma districts). In April 2012 (see map in Figure 2), the Japanese
authorities defined zones within these evacuation areas, to which, in view of the measured
contamination levels and the expected levels of external exposure (less than 20 mSv/year), people
could initially return in order to perform certain activities for a short period in preparation for the
population’s return; this concerns part of the Minamisoma, Tamura and Kawauchi districts (green
areas on the map in Figure 2). However, no one should be allowed to return to part of these
districts (orange areas, where the radioactive caesium deposits exceed 1 million Bq/m2) in the shortterm. In the areas with the highest caesium deposit levels (over 3 million Bq/m 2), the population’s
return seems barely feasible in the long term.

Figure 2 – Restricted area (20 km radius, in red) and deliberate evacuation area (in paleyellow) set up by the Japanese authorities on 1 April 2012 (source: METI, April 2012). The
green areas indicate parts of the restricted area set up in 2011 in which preparations arebeing made for the population’s return. The orange areas indicate parts of the Kawauchi andMinamisoma districts to which the population should not be allowed to return in the shortterm. The pink area represents a part of the Minamisoma district to which the population’s
return is barely feasible even in the long term due to the very considerable radioactive
deposits (the surface activity exceeds 3 million Bq/m2).
The durable contamination of certain foodstuffs produced in Japan is also caused by theresidual radioactive caesium deposits. Whereas the contamination found in plant foodstuffs during
the weeks following the accident was due to the direct contamination of the plants’ aerial parts

3/18

(notably the leaves) through atmospheric deposition, two complementary transfer mechanisms thencontinued to contaminate various plant products:-

Translocation of the radionuclides initially deposited on the leaves, meaning that theradionuclides (notably caesium) are absorbed by the leaves, transported in the sap and thenstored in some structural (wood) or storage tissue (bulbs, fruits, etc.); The plant can theneasily remobilise the radionuclides accumulated in this way when new shoots or fruit grow,long after the plant was initially contaminated. The effects of this process tend to fade overthe course of time;-

Root transfer of the radionuclides accumulated in the soil. Due to the long life of thecaesium-137 in the top layers of the soil, this is the main process resulting in the durable
contamination of wild or cultivated plants. The effects of this transfer process vary greatly,
however, depending on the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil and theplant species concerned. This phenomenon may be accentuated by the plant’s living
conditions, as in the case of rice, where radionuclides can also be transferred directly fromthe water in which it grows.

The durability of animal foodstuff contamination (meat, milk, eggs, etc.) directly depends on thequality of the animals’ feed. Although the quality of livestock’s feed can be monitored in order tokeep the level of contamination as low as possible, such checks are not possible in the case of wild
animals (game).
Lastly, the durability of contamination in foodstuffs coming from aquatic environments (freshwateror marine) depends not only upon the presence of the radionuclides in the water due to regular runoff containing the terrestrial deposits, but also (and mainly) upon the lifestyle and food of theaquatic species concerned.
The results of the measurements taken for various categories of foodstuffs in Japan and published in
the first half of 2012 provide an overall assessment of these contamination phenomena involving theresidual deposits of radioactive caesium. These results, which were collected and analysed by IRSN,
are summarised in the following chapters. They also show which types of products and places oforigin always exceed the sales and consumption standards set in Japan.

1. REPORT OF FOODSTUFF CONTAMINATION ACCORDING TO THE
RESULTS PUBLISHED IN JAPAN SINCE THE FUKUSHIMA ACCIDENT
1.1. Foodstuff contamination controls and restrictions set up in Japan
After the Fukushima accident occurred in March 2011, restrictions on the sale and consumptionof foodstuffs produced in Japan were set up by the Director-General of the Nuclear Emergency
Response Headquarters to limit the risk of exposure through the ingestion of contaminatedfoodstuffs. These restrictions are based both on radioactivity controls performed on the foodstuffs
produced in districts affected by radioactive fallout caused by the accident and on compliance withfood standards (radionuclide concentrations for different categories of foodstuffs) set at an
acceptable level of risk of exposure for the local population, in terms of radiation protection(Table 1). Initially, these standards related to various categories of radionuclides, but with thegradual disappearance of the short-lived radionuclides (notably iodine-131), only radioactive
caesium (134Cs and 137Cs) has been detected in Japanese foodstuffs since the summer of 2011.
Early in 2012, the Japanese authorities decided to optimise the existing standards in order toreduce the population’s exposure to a level as low as reasonably possible, notably in view ofchanges in the radioactive contamination in Japan (the disappearance of short-lived radionuclides
and the declining levels of detected radioactivity), by applying much more stringent standards witheffect from 1 April 2012 (Table 1). These concern only the radioactive caesiums (134Cs+137Cs), which
are the only radionuclides attributable to the Fukushima accident that can currently be detected infoodstuffs.

4/18

Table 1 – Radioactive caesium concentration standards (134Cs+137Cs) in foodstuffs in Japan,
defined following the Fukushima accident
Food category

Standards before 01/04/2012(Bq of

134+137

Drinking water

200

Milk

200

Vegetables
Cereals
Meat, eggs and fish

500

Food category

Cs/kg)⇒

Standards after 01/04/2012(Bq of 134+137Cs/kg)

Drinking water

10

Milk

50

Other general
foodstuffs

100

Infant feeds

50

Detailed rules have been introduced in order to decide when the restrictions (the prohibition of saleor consumption) should be introduced and lifted depending on the doses measured in the foodstuffs:-

Restricting the sale of a foodstuff if its caesium concentration (134Cs+137Cs) exceeds thestandard for the food category concerned;-

Restricting the consumption of a foodstuff if its radioactive caesium concentration is judged
too high (the official document by the Japanese authorities does not specify an exact limit);-

Lifting the restriction when the measured doses (in at least three measurements) obtainedin the last month for each district are all below the standards.

The MHLW (the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare) has regularly published andupdated the list of districts and foodstuffs concerned by these restrictions, as well as the results ofthe foodstuff monitoring.
The introduction of restrictions in specific districts in application of the rules described above
depends on which categories of foodstuffs are actually produced in the districts concerned and,
therefore, the harvesting season. As a result, restrictions were introduced in various districts of the
Fukushima, Ibaraki, Chiba, Miyagi, Tochigi, Iwate, Gunma and Kanagawa prefectures (solely in thecase of tea leaves) at various times during 2011 (and even early in 2012), depending on the types offoodstuffs and the moment when the food standards were seen to have been exceeded. With themore stringent standards introduced on 1 April 2012, new districts have been affected by theserestrictions. The restrictions introduced in 2011 or in 2012 are still in force in most districts today.
The relatively few districts that have had their restrictions lifted are mainly in the Chiba, Tochigi,
Ibaraki and Gunma prefectures, in the case of tea leaves.
According to the available information, it seems that the monitoring conducted by the Japanese
authorities is not based on a precisely detailed plan specifying the types of foodstuffs to be checkedor the locations in which monitoring is most important. The results should therefore be viewed witha degree of caution when they are compared over the course of time. This is because the measured
foodstuffs are not always the same from one month to another, and the samples are not always
taken in the same places (the number of sampling points in the districts varies depending on thetype of foodstuff and on the previously-obtained measurement results).
For plant agriculture, the number of analysed samples has increased over the course of time (there
were approximately twice as many controls in May 2012 as in May 2011; see Figure 3), reflecting the
progressive reinforcement of the control scheme in response to the results already obtained and themore stringent food standards. This has, as expected, resulted in the standards being exceeded
more frequently, increasing from a very low level before 1 April 2012 (less than 1% of the controlled
foodstuffs) to 9% in April 2012 and 5% in May 2012, i.e. the same level as in May 2011 with the oldstandards.

5/18

Figure 3 – Changes in the number of plant agriculture contamination controls and breaches offood standards in Japan since the beginning of 2012, and comparison with May 2011
For fishery products (marine and freshwater), the trend is the same as that of plant agriculture(Figure 4). The number of samples taken increases over the course of time as the control scheme isset up. The situation was fairly stable (approximately 4% of the samples exceeded the current
standards) until the standards changed on 1 April 2012, when the rate rose to 10%.
Fishery product measurements
Standards tightened(01/04/2012)

Standards tightened(01/04/2012)

January 2012

February 2012

January
2012

March 2012
April 2012

January 2012

February
2012

March
2012

April
2012

May
2012

May 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

No. of samples > standards
No. of samples measured

Figure 4 – Changes in the number of fishery product contamination controls and breaches offood standards in Japan since the beginning of 2012, and comparison with May 2011
For meat, the situation is fairly stable and does not seem to be affected by the revised foodstandards (Figure 5). The food standards are generally exceeded very infrequently, and almost all
breaches concern game meat (mainly wild boar).

6/18

Meat measurements
Standards tightened(01/04/2012)

January 2012

Standards tightened(01/04/2012)

January2012

February 2012 March 2012
April 2012

January 2012

February
2012

March
2012

April
2012

May
2012

May 2012

February 2012

March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

No. of samples > standards
No. of samples measured

Figure 5 – Changes in the number of meat contamination controls and breaches of foodstandards in Japan since the beginning of 2012, and comparison with May 2011
The following paragraphs show the changes in the contamination of the main categories ofcontrolled foodstuffs in Japan. The values shown are based on the analytical results published up to
the end of June 2012 for 185,756 foodstuff samples, of which 28,477 are for the Fukushima
prefecture alone. During the months following the accident, these results regularly revealed
significant specific activity in caesium-134, caesium-137 and iodine-131. Iodine-131 has not been
detected in foodstuffs since summer 2011 because of its short radioactive life (8 days), which has
resulted in it disappearing from the environment. Subsequently, only radioactive caesium specificactivity (expressed in Becquerels of 134Cs+137Cs per kilogramme of fresh product – Bq/kg) is used to
track the residual effect of fallout from the Fukushima accident upon food in Japan.

1.2. Terrestrial plant products
As plant production is often seasonal, the results available for the first half of 2012 relate only to
products actually harvested during this period. They relate to both cultivated and wild products.
•

Mushrooms

Between March 2011 and March 2012, the sales standards in force during this period have been
exceeded many times in the case of shiitake mushrooms (Figure 6). The shiitake mushroom, which isalso called the “black mushroom”, “scented mushroom”, “lentin” or “oak lentin”, takes its
Japanese name from shii, a type of tree (similar to the oak) on which it grows in its natural habitat,
and take, which means “mushroom growing on”. The shiitake is the second most widely-cultivatedfungus in the world. It can easily be found on grocery store shelves, often in its dried form. In
Japan, it is grown in greenhouses or outdoors, on wooden logs (“log-grown”) or on a bed of compost
in a mushroom house (“mushroom bed-grown”).
More rarely, other species of mushrooms have exceeded the standards during this period: Grifola
frondosa (maitake), Lactarius volemus (tawny milkcap), Suillus bovinus (Jersey cow) and Pholiota
nameko.
Between April and June 2012, the only mushrooms that exceeded the new sales standards havebeen shiitake: of more than 800 analysed samples, 196 fresh and 79 dried shiiitake mushrooms
exceeded the standard.

7/18

Figure 6 – Shiitake mushroom grown on a trunk
The graph in Figure 7 shows the 2036 results of radioactive caesium activity measurements(134Cs+137Cs) in undried shiitake mushrooms obtained between April 2011 and May 2012,
distinguishing between the analysed mushrooms’ prefectures of origin. The 812 values below thedetection limits are conventionally recorded as 1 Bq/kg. This graph shows that the measured levelsof contamination vary considerably (by a factor of 1000:1), which can be explained by the analysedsamples’ place of origin and their growing conditions; in addition, no significant difference can beseen between the results for samples from the Fukushima prefecture and those from othermonitored prefectures. This graph also shows that the contamination levels have not changed overthe course of the period.

Caesium (134 +137) in Bq/kg

Fukushima prefecture
Other prefectures

Mar. ’11

May ’11

July ¹11

Aug. ’11

Oct. ’11

Dec. ’11

Jan. ’12

Mar. ’12

May ’12Figure 7 - Specific activity in caesium-134+137 in undried shiitake mushrooms measured
between April 2011 and May 2012 (source: MHLW). By convention, measurements that are“undetectable” are given a value of 1 Bq/kg
Most of the 549 analysed samples applying to shiitake grown indoors (mushroom bed-grown or loggrown) have revealed radioactive caesium activity levels below the measuring instruments’detection limits. Of these 549 results, only four exceed 500 Bq/kg: three log-grown shiitake samples(with a maximum value of 1,770 Bq/kg) and a mushroom bed-grown shiitake sample (850 Bq/kg), allof which are from the Fukushima prefecture.
Of the 535 analytical results for shiitake mushrooms grown outdoors (usually on logs), the caesium
activity exceeds 170 Bq/kg in half of the cases and 40 results exceed 500 Bq/kg, most of which
involve samples taken from the Iwate prefecture. The maximum value is 2,300 Bq/kg for a loggrown shiitake sample from the Iwate prefecture.

8/18

In the other published measurement results, it is not specified whether the shiitake was grownindoors or outdoors.
Of course, as the drying process concentrates the caesium, the dried shiitake mushrooms’ specificactivity can reach even higher values, with a maximum value of 6940 Bq/kg measured in a sample
from the Tochigi prefecture in November 2011.
All of these results suggest that the contamination of these mushrooms (and more specifically, ofthe carpophorus, the edible part) is mainly the result of the translocation of mycelium
contamination (the mycelium, the perennial part of the mushroom, has a life of several years). This
mycelium contamination may either have been directly caused by the radioactive fallout in March2011 or be due to contamination of the substrate on which the mycelium grows (if the log has been
exposed to the radioactive plume, for example). We can expect the mushroom contamination tolast for years or even decades with little change in the caesium activity.
The map in Figure 8 shows the districts affected by the shiitake mushroom sales restrictions,indicating (in green) those to which the old standards applied and those (in red) to which the new,more stringent food standards apply since their introduction in Japan.

Key
Restriction periods for shi take mushrooms
No restrictions
Before 01/04/2012 – Old standards
After 01/04/2012 – New standards

Figure 8 – Map of Japanese districts affected by the shiitake mushroom sales restrictions as at
22 June 2012•

Other terrestrial plant foodstuffs

In addition to the mushrooms, various other cultivated or wild plant foodstuffs have been regularly
monitored in Japan during their harvest periods. Some of them have revealed radioactive caesium
concentrations that exceed the new food standards introduced on 1 April 2012. They are:
- Young tree or bush shoots eaten in spring: Caesium concentrations in excess of the newstandards were measured in 57 koshiabura samples and 19 Aralia shoot samples taken in April
and May 2012. The shoots of the koshiabura tree are usually consumed in the form of doughnuts(tempura). The young Aralia shoots are consumed in Russia and Asia, and they are also used in
the manufacture of cosmetic beauty products. Figure 9 shows the changes in caesium activity(134Cs+137Cs) in these foodstuffs between March 2011 and May 2012; these results concern 151
Aralia shoot samples, 51 of which were grown in greenhouses and 44 were “wild” (noinformation was provided on the 56 other samples), and 81 koshiabura samples, 25 of whichwere “wild” (no information was provided on the others). The samples were highly seasonal,
and most were taken in spring 2011 and spring 2012. The 69 “wild” samples (44 Aralia shootsand 25 koshiabura shoots) were all taken in April and May 2012; they were probably gathered inforests.

9/18

Caesium activity (Bq/kg)

Fukushima prefecture
Other prefectures

Mar. ’11

May ’11

June-

Aug. ’11

Oct. ’11

134

137

Nov. ’11 Jan. ’12

Mar. ’12

Apr. ’12

June ’12

Figure 9 - Specific activity in caesium ( Cs+ Cs) in edible young tree shoots (koshiabura andAralia) between March 2011 and May 2012 (source: MHLW). By convention, measurements thatare “undetectable” are given a value of 1 Bq/kg
These foodstuffs are still considerably contaminated, with the same contamination levels as in2011. The highest specific activities (2,800 Bq/kg and 2,900 Bq/kg) were found in two “wild”
koshiabura samples taken at the end of April/beginning of May 2012 in the Tochigi prefecture.
The winter 2011/2012 samples were, on the other hand, grown in greenhouses and revealed
lower specific activities. The highest specific activity found in a greenhouse-grown sample was
130 Bq/kg in an Aralia shoot sample from Kawamata (Fukushima prefecture) taken at the end of
February 2012. Apart from the seasonality, there does not seem to be any noticeable trend overthe course of time. The young shoots are contaminated through translocation from theperennial part of the tree. The caesium concentration levels can be expected to remain high forthe next few years. The maps in Figure 10 show the districts affected by the Aralia andkoshiabura shoot sales restrictions, taking into account the new food standards in force inJapan.

Key

Key

Restr ct on periods for aral a shoots

Restriction periods for kosh abura shoots

No restr ct ons

No restrictions

Af er 01/0 /2012 – New s andards

After 01/0 /2012 – New standards

Figure 10 – Maps of Japanese districts concerned by Aralia (left) and koshiabura (right) shootsales restrictions as at 22 June 201210/18

- Bamboo shoots: Between April and May 2012, caesium concentrations exceeding the newstandards were measured in 47 bamboo shoot samples. Figure 11 shows the changes in caesium
activity (134Cs+137Cs) in the bamboo shoots from March 2011 to May 2012. This situation is similar
to that of the tree shoots, with the spring 2012 concentration levels slightly lower than those in2011 (the standards were exceeded three times less in May 2012 than in May 2011). The
durability of the contamination is due to a phenomenon of translocation from the perennial partof the plant, and we can expect this to occur again during the next few years.

Caesium activity (Bq/kg)

Fukushima prefecture
Other prefectures

Mar. ’11

May ’11

July ¹11

Sept. ’11

134

Nov. ’11

Jan. ’12

Mar. ’12

May ’12

July ’12

137

Figure 11 – Specific activity in caesium ( Cs+ Cs) in bamboo shoots between March 2011 andMay 2012 (source: MHLW). By convention, measurements that are “undetectable” are given a
value of 1 Bq/kg
The map in Figure 12 shows the districts affected by bamboo shoot sales restrictions. The more
stringent food standards have had a considerable effect on the number of districts newly
affected by restrictions.

Key
Restriction periods for bamboo shoots
No restrictions
Before 01/04/2012 – Old standards
After 01/04/2012 – New standards

Figure 12 – Map of Japanese districts affected by bamboo shoot sales restrictions as at 22
June 2012 (in red: districts affected since the introduction of the new food standards)- Fiddleheads (Figure 13): between April and May 2012, 44 samples of fern varieties with edible
fiddleheads (ostrich ferns, royal ferns and bracken) were measured with caesium concentrations

11/18

exceeding the new standards (between 110 and 1100 Bq/kg). The contamination process(translocation) and trends are similar to those of tree shoots and bamboo shoots;

Figure 13 - Edible fiddleheads- Tea, which has been analysed very many times and yet it has only exceeded the detection limits(let alone the sales standards) in a minority of cases. In the month of May 2012 alone (theperiod of the “first flush”, or first harvest), 536 tea samples were analysed and only 11
exceeded 10 Bq/kg, with none ever exceeding 25 Bq/kg, in the Tochigi, Ibaraki and Chiba
prefectures. However, some sales restrictions introduced in 2011 still remain, mainly in the
Ibaraki prefecture. Since 1 April 2012, the tea-leaf sales restriction has been lifted in only
13 districts in the Ibaraki, Tochigi, Gunma and Chiba prefectures;- Yacón tea leaf powder from the Miyagi prefecture, of which 4 samples taken in 2012 (from a
total of 12 measured samples) have revealed radioactive caesium specific activity levels ranging
from 15,000 Bq/kg to 20,000 Bq/kg. Despite its name, yacón tea cannot be compared with aninfusion tea: it is a powder extracted from a tuber, the Peruvian ground apple (or yacón), grown
for its sweetening properties (Figure 14). It is a perennial member of the Asteraceae family,
similar to the sunflower and Jerusalem artichoke. Yacón provides two products: yacón syrup andyacón tea. The very high caesium concentrations measured in 2012 are probably due to thepowder transformation process.

Figure 14 – Yacón: aerial part (left) and edible tubers (right)
The caesium concentrations of the other plant foodstuffs monitored in Japan more rarely exceed
the new food standards: petasites (or butterbur scape, a wild herbaceous plant) and a few otheredible wild plants (ashitaba, uwabamisou, etc.) (approximately a dozen cases); emu, or Japanese
apricot (two cases); spinach (one case); wasabi (one case); and Japanese parsley (one case).

12/18

1.3. Meat and milk
Numerous controls have been performed on the meat produced in Japan, which mainly consists ofbeef, since the Fukushima accident (see Figure 5).
•

Livestock meat and cow’s milk

Each month, many beef samples are measured (approximately 98% of the total number of meatmeasurements) but none, or virtually none, are found to exceed the food standards (one sample
from the Iwate prefecture in January and another in March 2012). In May 2012, only 20 of the morethan 10,000 analytical results exceeded the detection limits, with a maximum of 92 Bq/kg (from the
Miyagi prefecture).
The results are similar for pork, with less intense monitoring. For the month of May 2012 alone, only
6 of the 77 caesium specific activity samples analysed (134Cs+137Cs) exceeded the detection limits,with a maximum of 110 Bq/kg (from the Fukushima prefecture).
Cow's milk is also constantly monitored, with most results below the measuring instruments’detection limits, as well as all forms of infant milk.
These good results, both for meat and for milk, seem to confirm that the quality of the livestock
feed is properly controlled; this is made easier by the rearing technique most widely used in Japan(stalling). In view of the durable environmental contamination, the maintaining of regularmonitoring is justified in order to detect any adverse events. If cattle regularly consume
moderately-contaminated feed (approximately 100 Bq/kg), the meat’s caesium concentration can
gradually increase and exceed the sales standards, as occurred in July 2011 in the case of someherds (Kawamata-Machi).
•Game

Unlike livestock, it is not possible to check the quality of wild game’s food. As a result, it is in thistype of meat that the highest radioactive caesium concentrations are most regularly found. This isparticularly true of wild boar meat, in which the contamination regularly exceeds the foodstandards. This is due to the fact that the wild boars live in forests, which are seriously
contaminated as a result of discharges into the atmosphere and have not been decontaminated.
Very occasionally, the current standards are exceeded by brown bear, deer or even hare meat
samples (see Figure 15).

Brown bear
Beef

Hare

Deer
Pork

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

Hare

Deer

Brown bear

Hare

Pork

Beef

Red

April 2012
Red

Brown bear
Pork

Hare

W ld boar
Pork

Beef

Beef

Wild boar

Wild boar

W ld boar

Brown bear

May 2012
Deer

January 2012

Brown bear

Hare

February 2012 March 2012

April 2012

May 2012

Brown

Beef
Pork

Pork
Wild boar
Beef

Wi d boar

Hare
Deer

Figure 15 – Distribution of breaches of sales standards by meat type, since the beginning of2012
Figure 16 shows the changes in caesium activity (134Cs+137Cs) in wild boar meat from March 2011 to
May 2012. Despite a slight downward trend over the course of time, the values remain consistently

13/18

higher than the detection limits and often exceed the sales limits. This situation can be expected tolast for as long as the forests’ specific activity remains high.

Caesium activity (Bq/kg)

Fukushima Fukushima
Other prefectures

Mar. ’11

May ’11

July ¹11

Sept. ’11

Nov. ’11

134

137

Jan. ’12

Mar. ’12

May ’12

July ’12

Figure 16 – Specific activity of caesium ( Cs+ Cs) in wild boar meat between March 2011
and May 2012 (source: MHLW). By convention, measurements that are “undetectable” aregiven a value of 1 Bq/kg

1.4. Marine or freshwater foodstuffs
The marine or freshwater foodstuffs sampled in the areas affected by the accident still have fairly
high levels of caesium contamination, justifying the maintaining of production monitoring andrestrictions. A more detailed description of the situation regarding marine organisms is contained in
IRSN memo entitled “Updated summary of knowledge concerning the impact on the marine
environment of radioactive discharge from the damaged nuclear site of Fukushima Dai-ichi”. Thissummary only contains the main elements concerning marine or freshwater organisms intended forhuman consumption.
•

Marine products

In the last few months and before the 1 April 2012, the date on which the new food standards wereintroduced, the only marine organisms whose caesium concentration exceeded the standard in force
at the time (500 Bq/kg wet) were fish, all of which were from the Fukushima prefecture. After thisstandard was reduced to 100 Bq/kg wet, it was sometimes exceeded not only by various species offish, but occasionally also by clams and sea urchins. This has led the Japanese authorities to extend
the fish and marine product sales and consumption restrictions to other areas (Figure 17): in
addition to the ports in the Fukushima prefecture, which were already affected by the restrictions
before 1 April 2012, the restrictions have been extended to the ports in the Miyagi and Ibaraki
prefectures. These restrictions apply to the landing of the fish specified by the authorities (this listis periodically updated by the MLHW) in the prefectures’ ports, regardless of where they werecaught.

14/18

-Sea bass
Pacific cod
Panther puffer
Flounder- Juvenile sandeels(also consumption
restriction)- Rockfish- Whitefish- Flounder- Ocellate spot skate
Key
Restriction periods for saltwater fish
No restrictions
Before 01/04/2012 – Old standards
After 01/04/2012 – New standards

Figure 17 – Map of areas in which the landing of saltwater fish is restricted as at 22 June 2012
The graph in Figure 18 shows the measured caesium concentration levels in different marine species
between March 2011 and March 2012.

Caesium (Bq/kg wet)
AinameCongerHalibut
GurnardJapanese sand lance
Poacher
Ray
RedfishHorse mackerel
MackerelSardineAbalones
Sea urchins
Clams

Figure 18 – Changes over time of 137Cs+134Cs (Bq/kg wet) concentrations in some marine
products, between March 2011 and March 2012
The following comments can be made regarding these results:-

The caesium concentration varies greatly (by a factor of 1000:1), due to the wide range ofplaces in which the various species were caught and their lifestyle (mobility, feed, etc.);-

Sedimentary fish (represented by orange symbols in Figure 18), such as ainames, halibuts,
gurnards, rays and rockfish, tend to have higher concentration levels than pelagic species(represented by bluish symbols in Figure 18) such as mackerel, sardines and horse mackerel;-

It should be noted that the sea urchin, abalone and clam samples taken from the Fukushima
prefecture can also reach high levels (represented by pink symbols in Figure 18);

15/18

-

For most species, it is difficult to see any change in contamination over the course of time
(upward or downward), given the wide range of results obtained. However, a downward
trend in the contamination levels can be seen in the molluscs (such as mussels, oysters,
clams and abalones) or grazing organisms (sea urchins), due to a reduction in the ambient
contamination of the sea water and the lack of any new major discharges.

The results show the long-lasting high levels of contamination in various marine species caught
along the coast of the Fukushima prefecture; these regularly exceed the sales and consumption
standards, particularly since the standards were tightened on 1 April 2012. This situation justifies
the continued monitoring of marine species caught in the north-eastern coastal waters of Japan.
•

Freshwater products

Five fish species of which samples were caught in lakes or rivers have higher contamination levels
that regularly exceed the food standards in the Fukushima prefecture and are regularly monitored(Figure 19). They are: dace (Tribolodon hakonensis), white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis),ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis), masu salmon (Oncorhyncus masou) and Japanese smelt (Hypomesus
nipponensis). Apart from the dace, all of the other species are amphihaline (meaning that theymigrate from fresh to salt waters and vice versa). However, it should be noted that some
populations of these species may remain attached to fresh waters throughout their life-cycle.

Ayu Fukushima

Smelt Fukushima

Dace Fukushima

Char Fukushima

Salmon Fukushima

Smelt Gunma

Dace Gunma

Char Gunma

Minamisoma city

lidate village
134

137

Cs + Cs in
Bq/kg wetFigure 19 – Caesium concentration levels (134Cs+137Cs) in five species of fish caught in rivers orlakes in the Fukushima prefecture The red lines represent the maximum permitted levels forfood consumption (solid line up to 1 April 2012: 500 Bq/kg wet; dotted line from 1 April 2012:
100 Bq/kg wet)
The results vary considerably, however what clearly stands out is the fact that the most affected
samples were all collected from rivers or lakes in the Fukushima prefecture (shown in red) except
for a few specimens fished from lakes in the Gunma prefecture (shown in blue). The highest levels
were found in fish caught near to the city of Minamisoma in the Fukushima prefecture. A
contamination level of a masu salmon sample caught in Iidate on 18 March 2012 was extremely high,reaching 18700 Bq/kg wet.
These changes should generally be directly related to the high contamination levels in theseenvironments.

16/18

It should be noted that one species of salmon, the chum salmon (Oncorhyncus keta), was also
monitored regularly in the Hokkaido and Fukushima prefectures. The levels found are almost always
below the detection limits. This can be directly related to how this species lives; only adultspecimens are found in rivers, and they do not eat during that phase of their lives, which tends tohighlight the importance of the trophic route as the main source of contamination in the fish.
A number of other species have been subjected to more or less regular monitoring, such as various
types of molluscs, crabs, crawfish, shrimps, carp and other species of salmon. Since January 2012,
the levels detected in these samples are usually less than 200 Bq/kg wet (137Cs+134Cs), althoughthese levels may occasionally be exceeded.

17/18

2. CONCLUSION
The results of the monitoring by the Japanese authorities generally show that the livestock andplant production contamination level is considerably lower than in the spring of 2011. In addition,
the monitoring has been increased and some producers have even set up more stringent measuresthan those of the Japanese authorities. All of these measures help to increase Japan’s food safety.
Some foodstuffs, however, still reveal high radioactive caesium levels in the first half of 2012:
shiitake mushrooms, some plant products such as bamboo shoots or even wild plants, game, certain
freshwater fish (salmon and carp) from the Fukushima prefecture or adjoining prefectures, or somemarine products caught along the coast near to the damaged nuclear power plant. Fortunately, inmost cases these are foodstuffs said to be of “lesser importance” as they play a small part in thestandard diet in Japan (with the exception of fish).
This situation has resulted in the Japanese foodstuff sales and consumption standards being
exceeded more frequently since they were made more stringent on 1 April 2012.
IRSN therefore recommends a certain degree of caution regarding the consumption of the following
foodstuffs:-

Wild plants and boar meat: these products come from a forest environment, where nothingis done to reduce the contamination;-

Shiitake mushrooms: the restrictions are widened daily, and the districts concerned arefurther and further away from the Fukushima prefecture.

-

Fish (marine and freshwater), the contamination levels of which regularly and constantly
exceed the standards.

Care should be taken regarding the origin and, where appropriate, the measured contaminationlevels of these foodstuffs. In general, a varied diet (particularly in terms of its origin) is
recommended in order to effectively reduce internal contamination via ingestion.

18/18