1

Reading materials for learning TOEIC vocabulary based on corpus data
TANIMURA Midori
UTIYAMA Masao
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology
1.

Introduction
It is agreed that presenting words in context rather than isolating them from context
enhances learners’ acquisition of vocabulary. For example, several recent studies havefound positive evidence supporting the use of explicit vocabulary instruction in
conjunction with reading (Paribakht & Wesche 1997). A great deal of vocabulary
learning material which follows this idea has also been provided by publishers or on theWeb, however, the selection of most words is mainly based on material writers’
experience and intuition. Indeed, Kennedy (1987a, 1987b) points out that corpora areuseful tools to look critically at existing language teaching materials about ways of
expressing quantification and frequency of vocabulary in ESL (English as a second
language) textbooks. Considering recent remarkable developments and the progress ofcomputer technology, it is now possible to select vocabulary statistically, and creatematerials objectively based on vast amounts of corpus data.
The sorts of learners we principally have in mind are the ones who mastered seniorhigh school level vocabulary and want to continue to increase their vocabulary. We
attempt to bridge the gap between English vocabulary used in Japanese senior highschool textbooks and those used in international communication through reading.
2.

Literature review
What are the factors that should be taken into account when creating materials forlearning vocabulary based on corpus data? It would be suggested that there are threemajor factors to be considered: (1) recycling and attention; (2) words in context; and (3)word selection by corpus data.
(1) Recycling and attention
Much research has been done about vocabulary learning through reading. In L1
study, Gardner (2004) points out that children (ages 5 to 12) learn 3000 new words
every year and that 12th graders (ages 17 and 18) have approximately 40,000 words.
“Word” can be defined as “a word family which consists of a base word, its inflected
forms and common derivations (Laufer & Nation, 1995; Nation & Waring, 1997).”
The major source of acquiring vocabulary for them is reading in multiple andvarious contexts. However, in EFL situations, it is unlikely that learners meet the samewords even though textbooks provide a variety of texts to learners, because learners are
not exposed enough to acquire words. Nation (1990:44) for example points out that “Itis important for teachers in countries where English is not used much outside theclassroom to know whether they can rely on coursebook to provide enough repetition
for vocabulary learning to be possible.” Therefore, it is critically important in reading2that learners have the opportunity to keep meeting words that they have met before andthese words need to be reinforced by another meeting in limited time (Paribakht &Wesche 1997). Indeed, there is interesting research done by Rott (1999) about the
number of times a learner needs to be exposed to unknown words to acquire and retain
them. The results indicate 6 times exposure produced significantly more vocabulary.
Other researchers also have found similar results.
On the other hand, according to some psychologists (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Craik& Tulving, 1975), repetition is not an important factor in vocabulary learning, butattention that is given to an item decides whether it will be remembered or not. Ellis(1995) and Robinson (1995) also indicate that vocabulary learning requires attention but
it should be addressed to both meaning and form. Furthermore, in Fraser’s study(1999), higher retention rates occur when words are noticed and potentially highly
salient. She notes that this occurs with not only L1 cognates but also in L2 word
association, and frequently encountered words.
(2) Words in context
Traditionally the way of learning vocabulary typically involves memorizing, making
vocabulary cards and looking up dictionaries. Nation (1990) actually cites that one of
the great attractions of learning lists of words is that large number of words can belearned in a very short time. He goes on to state that a lot of research has shown theeffect of learning lists of words. However, Fanselow (1992) argues that learners can
not store word meaning if they use word lists (Laufer, 1997; Nagy, 1997). A good
example for this would be that learners often forget words just after the test was done.
He further claims that learning words without the context is not only less effective inunderstanding meaning, but also it gives bad influence for reading.
On the other hand, comprehension of a text involves multiple exposures to the wordin context. It requires deep processing of information about the words, leads to a moreaccurate understanding of word meaning, and fosters vocabulary acquisition (Ellis
1995). Another piece of research also has shown the fact that reading plus vocabulary
instruction treatment led to a quantitatively and qualitatively superior gain (Qian 1996).
(3) Word selection by corpus data
After a basic level of high frequency words is learned, all students need to develop
knowledge of technical or topical vocabulary in order to grasp the idea of specialized
texts which they will encounter in their own particular fields. To select words for
specific purposes, there has been development of various word lists which attempt tocount frequency in specific areas (O’ Dell 1997:269). Nation (1990) summarizes
several values which specialized word counts have. First, they provide a useful guideto which vocabulary learners should focus on in reading. Second, they can play therole of a checklist and a goal for learners. Through marking important words which
they do not know, these words are brought to the learners’ conscious attention and they
are more likely to stay in their mind.
It should be kept in mind however that the results of frequency count often differ

3depending on which corpus is used. As Nation and Newton (1997) mention, every
field has its own technical vocabulary, which is used within a narrow range andnormally used within a specialized field. In other words, in a particular field it may
occur frequently, but in other fields it may scarcely occur. In fact, Grabe (1991) argues
that in specialized academic settings, infrequent words may be the most important forL2 learners to know, because they may be closely connected to the topic being
discussed.
The studies above reveal three points: (1) vocabulary should be recycled and it
should obtain learners’ attention; (2) vocabulary should be presented in contexts; and (3)vocabulary for specific areas should be selected by appropriate corpus data. However,there does not seem to be any traditional materials which meet all three criteria at thesame time. In this paper, we propose new vocabulary learning materials for the
TOEIC test in reading. In order to examine its usefulness and effectiveness, it wasused in class for a year and it was compared with a vocabulary list book where newwords and their meanings were isolated from contexts and which was basically based onmaterial writers’ experience.
To examine the validity of our reading texts, the following research questions were
examined:
1. Which material is more effective and efficient to retain the meanings ofvocabulary, texts or word lists?
2. Does general reading ability improve after learning words for the TOEIC
test?
3.

Features of our reading texts
The aim of producing our reading material is to help students effectively learn
words for TOEIC in context, thus it is important to decide which new words learners
should be exposed to and the degree to which those words are recycled. Our readingmaterial consists of 642 words which occur most frequently in the TOEIC test according
to research results by Chujo (2003) and Chujo et al. (2004). The bulk of the corpus
analyzed in this study consists of parts of the Daily Yomiuri from 1989 to 2001 (about
25000 articles). The choice to use a newspaper is based on the assumption that it
includes more words related to finance, business and economy covering a broad rangeof topics in the TOEIC test rather than a different genre such as the novel, and the Daily
Yomiuri is the only Japanese newspaper which is available for non-commercial research
purposes. Our reading material was constructed by the following steps (see Utiyama
et al. 2004. for more details on how to create materials).
Step 1.
Step 2.

Gather the texts (= articles) containing as many new and recycled words(that are shared with the 642 words) as possible.
Sort the texts by size of how many new and recycled words are included.

In the end, 116 texts which contained 642 words were constructed as reading material.

4

Due to the algorithm, the texts selected at the earlier stage of this process had more newwords than the ones selected at the later stage. That is, the number of new words
gradually decreases as learners go on in their study. For example, in the first text, 43
new words were included which need to be learned for the TOEIC test while in the tenth
text 16 new words were included. This means that most words in the TOEIC
vocabulary were covered in the earlier texts. Thus, learners can learn vocabulary
efficiently even if all reading texts can not be covered in the lesson. The readingmaterial was also designed to contain as many recycled words out of the 642 words as
possible so that learners meet the same words repeatedly through reading the texts. In
this study, 60 texts out of 108 were used as reading texts through the academic year.
The following statistics are thus based on the words in 60 texts.
The following is a sample of an English text. The third text is chosen here because
the first and second texts do not include recycled words. In the original text of the
English version, three different colors were used to distinguish new words and two
kinds of recycled words. New words were colored in red, recycled words which
occurred in previous texts were colored in blue and recycled words which occurred in
the same text were colored in orange. In the following example, new words areunderlined, recycled words in previous texts are in italics, and recycled words in thesame text are boxed.
３．Consumer fraud incidents increasing
A growing number of people are falling victim to firms that ask for payment in advance but fail todeliver personal computers and other brand name goods offered at 40-70 percent discounts
through newspaper inserts. As of Wednesday, consumer protection centers nationwide reported

receiving more than 2,000 complaints from angry consumers claiming to have been victimized bysuch discount sales ploys. During the past year, law enforcement authorities have exposed fourorganizations nationwide said to have been behind such schemes. Victims order the products over
the telephone--using various methods of payment--attracted by the notion of purchasing highquality products at low prices. Police and consumer protection centers are advising consumers to
be on guard and consider the risks of paying for merchandise before delivery. According to the
National Police Agency, cases of such discount sales ploys began to increase about two years ago.
The agency has since stepped up efforts to crack down on such crimes. Japan Discount Service, amail order firm based in Tokyo's Shinjuku Ward, claimed in a newspaper insert that those paying a
10,000 yen membership fee would be able to buy household appliances from Japan's top
manufacturers at 60-70 percent off suggested retail prices. The organization attracted 40,000
members and was raided by Ibaraki Prefectural Police last September on suspicion of violating atelephone sales-related law. Investigators last March raided the offices of a marketing firm
specializing in personal computer equipment sales, also based in Shinjuku Ward, for failing to deliverproducts to customers who had paid the company a total of 200 million yen.

It is assumed that those colored words work as markers to make learners conscious ofthem and get their attention.

5

Table 1 and Table 2 present how the target (TOEIC) words were recycled in thereading material. Table 1 shows the high token frequency words. For example,“company,” the top ranking word, occurs 50 times throughout the texts. This could
occur in the same text more than once. The word “according” in rank 4 is often used
as “according to,” but phrases are not considered in this study.
Table 1 High Token Frequency Words (the Top 20)
Ranking

Words

Number of

11

employee18

Occurrences11

director

18

1

company

50

11fiscal18

2

official

45

14

price

17

3

bank

38

14

department

174

according

27

16

law

16

5

tax

25

17

sale

15

5

service25

17president

15

7

million23

19

industry

14

7

number23

19

receive14

9agency19

19

import14

9expect

19

19

loan

14

Table 2 shows the number of texts where each word occurs. For example,“official,” the top ranking word, occurs in 31 texts and learners most often meet thisword in a different time through a year.
Table 2 Number of Texts Where Each Type Occurs (the Top 20)
Ranking

Words

Number of

9

offer

10

Occurrences

12current

91

official

31

12

provide92company

21

12

bank

9

3

expect

14

15

firm

8

3

according

14

15

concern

8

5number12

15

agency86employee

11

15

cost

8

6

receive

11

15

organization

8

6

service11

15

industry

8

9million

10

15

price

8

9

area

10

15

fiscal8

6

As shown in Table 1 and 2, target words are recycled and consequently learners arelikely to be exposed enough to acquire target vocabulary efficiently.
4.
Procedure
4.1. Participants
Ninety-nine Japanese English learners aged between 18 and 20 years old
participated in this study. There were three groups of participants; class A, B and C,
who were placed according to the scores of their entrance exams. They are first year
students majoring in science, marketing, architecture and engineering in a university.
In this university, first year students are required to take two English classes by the same
Japanese instructors and one English conversation class by foreign teachers every week.
A total of 60 lessons in both the first and the second semester taught by a Japaneseteacher were targeted for this study.
4.2. Instruction
An instruction sheet was delivered to the learners. To access the reading texts on
the Web, learners were supplied with the URL, a username and a password. Learners
were told that the lessons using these reading texts were part of reading materials
development for vocabulary learning. Then learners were instructed on how to follow
the Web page.
This is a part of the page where reading texts are listed. Learners studied from 1.
Streamlining to cost NTT over 1.4 tril. yen. This text contains 296 words and wasissued on November 9th 2001. It contains 43 common words in the TOEIC vocabulary.
All of the words were new and there were no recycled words. Printed materials werealso prepared for the learners who had difficulty accessing a computer.
TOEIC COURSE 1 (642 words, 116 articles)
１．Streamlining to cost NTT over 1.4 tril. yen (296 words - 2001/11/09)
43 common = 43 new + 0 old
new: account agreement allowance amount approve bank committee company compensation
convention corporate cost current demand due earnings employee expect expense expensive
old:
6.7% (43/642) learned.296 words read.
２．Council recommends measures to more effectively cope with (255 words - 1995/09/12)

7

4.3. Treatment
The treatment in this study was carried out from May 2004 to January 2005. Twokinds of materials were used as a supplement for learning vocabulary for the TOEIC test,
one was our reading texts and the other a commercially available vocabulary list bookwhich learners were required to purchase and study in each lesson. In this vocabularylist, each word with a pronunciation guide followed by its meanings is presented on theleft-hand side, and some specific words are accompanied by typical usage with theJapanese translation on the right-hand side. This vocabulary list book, however, does
not present example sentences of all the words.
Learners were required to study both vocabulary learning materials as homework,and they were tested in each lesson. During the summer holidays, the learners werealso required to study both sets of vocabulary. Through the year, 60 out of the 116
reading texts were covered, while all words in the vocabulary list book were covered.
The reason all the words in reading texts were not covered was the logistics of thelesson schedule, but 559 words out of 642 were covered; which amounts to 87% of theimportant words.
4.4. Measure
Two kinds of tests were conducted: (a) vocabulary retention test; and (b) reading
comprehension tests following the TOEIC format which consisted of 40 multiple choicetests. The retention test (see 4.5 test designs) was done to examine which vocabulary
learning materials were more effective to recall. Learners were asked to write
Japanese translations of the words which were listed in the test sheet. Since many
words have multiple senses and are different parts of speech (e.g. nouns, adjectives andverbs), learners were instructed to write as many meanings as possible. If one of themeanings which learners listed was compatible with the one in reading texts or
vocabulary list book, a score was given. The reading part of the TOEIC test was used inorder to assess learners’ initial and final reading levels on the first and the last day of thesemester. At the end of the semester a questionnaire was conducted to examine what
the students thought of the reading texts and the Web system they actually used for
self-study.
4.5. Test designs
4.5.1. Word selection
To select the words for the retention test, electric word lists needed to first be
prepared. Since there was no electric version in vocabulary list book, every word was8typed and stored as a text file. Next, each word in the vocabulary list book and in thereading texts was given a ranking in JACET. It is necessary to note that the words in
JACET 8000 are categorized as parts of speech and thus the same words occur several
times in different rankings. As table 3 shows, it turned out that only the words“upward” and “forward” occurred more than once.
Table 3 Frequency of “upward” and “forward”
Word

Part of Speech

Ranking

upwardAdv

3902

upwardA

6089

forward

A/Adv

642

forwardAdv

4187

In this study, the higher ranking is adopted; 3902 for “upward” and 642 for “forward”.
The original ranking was used for the other words, since they occur only once. All thewords in the reading texts and the vocabulary list book were then combined, and finally
three types of combined word rank lists were made: (1) words which occur in thereading texts but not in the vocabulary list book; (2) words which do not occur in thereading texts but occur in the vocabulary list book; and (3) words which occur in bothmaterials. The left column of Table 4 shows the total number of words which occur ineach type. The right column shows the number of the words which do not occur in
JACET. In order to select the words for retention test, those words which do not occur
in JACET were excluded.
Table 4 Distribution of Word Occurrence in Three Types
Total Number

JACET×of Words(1) Texts ○ – Lists ×

177

20

(2) Texts × – Lists ○

2206

221

(3) Texts ○ – Lists ○370

6Twenty words in each type (1), (2) and (3) and thus a total of sixty words were selected
for the retention test. To conform to the level of difficulty, the ranking distribution in
JACET 8000 was examined as in Figure 1-3.

9

Texts ○ - Lists ○Texts ○ - Lists ×
140

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0

120
100
80
60
40
20

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

0
0

1000 2000

3000

4000 5000

6000 7000

8000

Figure 3 Texts ○ - Lists ○Figure 1 Texts ○ - Lists ×
Texts × - Lists ○
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0

1000 2000

3000

4000 5000

6000 7000

8000

Figure 2 Texts × - Lists ○In JACET 8000, ranking 1 means the most frequent word and ranking 8000 means
the least. While figures 1 and 2 show that more than 10 words occur at the 5000 wordlevel, figure 3 shows that most words are distributed from 0 to 3000 word level and not
many words occur above the 4000 word level. Therefore five words were selectedfrom the 0 word level (from 1 to 999) to the 3000 word level (from 3000 to 3999) for
each type (see appendix).
It was predicted that the words in type (3) were most retained, those in type (1) wereless retained and those in (2) were least retained, because in type (3) words were mostrecycled and in type (2) words were least recycled.
4.5.2. Data analysis
To examine the efficiency and effect of the reading texts and the vocabulary list
book, a retention test was conducted and the score gained for each of the three types ofwords were calculated. The gain score and three types were then run as the dependent
variable and the independent variable in the statistical tests. One way ANOVA was run
and subsequent analysis by using the LSD post hoc test was then performed.
In order to evaluate general reading ability, t score was used to compare the TOEIC
test scores before and after the research.

10

5. Results
5.1. Results of research questions
Research question 1: Which material is more effective and efficient to retain themeanings of vocabulary, texts or word lists?
Table 6 presents means and standard deviation for retention test scoresaccording to the three types. The average score of (1) is the highest andthat of (2) is the lowest.
Table 6 Retention Test Scores
Mean

SD

(1) Texts ○ – Lists ×

14.9

2.2

(2) Texts × – Lists ○

10.8

3.2

(3) Texts ○ – Lists ○

13.7

3.7

Table 7 shows the result of one way ANOVA and it shows that the three types are
significantly different. Table 8 is a result of LSD post hoc test.
Table 7 One Way ANOVA
Ssq
BetweenDf

Ms

F-ratio46.68327

875.36032437.6801

2756.404

294

9.375524

3631.764

296

Significance
8.05E-14

GroupsWithinGroups
Total

Table 8 LSD Post Hoc Test
LSD

Mean Diff.

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval(I-J)

for Mean(I) SUBJECT(J) SUBJECT(1)Texts ○ - Lists ×(2)Texts × - Lists ○*4.091

0.435(3)Texts ○ - Lists ○*1.202(1)Texts ○ - Lists ×(2)Texts × - Lists ○(3)Texts ○ - Lists ○*Lower Bound

Upper Bound

0

3.234

4.947

0.435

0.006

0.345

2.058

*-4.091

0.435

0-4.947-3.234(3)Texts ○ - Lists ○*-2.889

0.435

1.53E-10-3.744-2.032(1)Texts ○ - Lists ×*-1.202

0.435

0.006

-2.058-0.345(2)Texts × - Lists ○*2.8890.435

1.53E-10

2.032

3.745

a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference in score

11

The result of table 8 can be summarized as follows: type (1) > type (2); type (1) >type (3); and type (3) > type (2). As might be expected, learners’ scores in type (1)were higher than in type (2) and the scores in type (3) were higher than in type (2).
Words in type (1) and (3) are recycled while the words in type (2) occur only. Thus
these results indicate that learning recycled words in reading texts is a more effective
way to remember vocabulary than learning from a vocabulary list book. In otherwords, the reading texts would make it possible for the learners to pay more attention to
the target words which they need to learn and the contexts help the learners tounderstand the meaning more easily.
In contrast, the score in type (1) is higher than type (3). There is a significant
difference between type (1) and type (3), which was not expected. Looking at the
average score in Table 7, however, the difference between the two types was 1.2 andthus it is not as big as the difference between type (1) and (2) or (2) and (3). Even
though the level of difficulty was carefully conformed when selecting words for the test,
learners may have known some words. Overall, this result indicates that texts are
more effective and efficient to retain meanings of vocabulary than word lists are.
Research question 2: Does general reading ability improve after learning words for
the TOEIC test?
Table 9 presents the mean and standard deviation for the pre- and post-tests of a
TOEIC reading section. T-test shows that pre- and post-tests are significantly different(t = -2.37, df = 76, p = 0.02).
Table 9 Pre- and Post-test Scores of a TOEIC Reading Section
Mean

SD

Pre-test

20.2

5.9

Post-test

21.5

7

Whereas there is a significant difference between pre- and post tests, the difference
between the scores is not much. Compared to the development of vocabulary skills,
the range of reading skills shows low rates of increase. Thus it would be difficult toconclude that development of vocabulary skills correlate with reading skills although
the result indicates that vocabulary learning would have a positive effect on generalreading ability. It should be noted that there are still many words left the students needto know for understanding the reading texts. Moreover reading involves different
types of knowledge, cognitive and linguistic skills and strategies. Vocabulary is

12important to reading comprehension but would play a part of role in reading
development.
5.2. Results of Questionnaire
A questionnaire was also conducted at the end of the semester. It was designed tobe completed in a short time. Most of the questions involved simple choices of option
or judgment presented on the familiar semantic differential scale, and expressed by acircle. The last question invited comment and opinions in which we hoped possible
issues may be raised.
Learners were asked to assess reading texts on a scale of 1 to 5 for each of thefollowing.
Table 10 Results of Scaling in Questionnaire
Questions

5-

1

Averagevery good-

not good

4.1

increased-

not increased

3.4(3) Is reading texts more fun than previous learning styles?

very fun-not fun3(4) Is reading texts useful?

very useful-

not useful

3.7(5) Do you think reading texts is easy and appropriate?

appropriate-

not appropriate

3.4(6) Do you want to use reading texts next year?

very much-

not very much

3.5

many

-

not many

3.5(1) Do you think it was good to have a vocabulary check test in

Scoreeach class?
(2) Do you think your vocabulary size for TOEIC increased
compared with in April?

(7) Do you think there are better materials than reading texts?

The average scores of the questions were between 3 and 4. The score of question(1) had the highest score of 4.1 and a substantial majority felt that learning vocabulary
was unavoidable and that they needed to be tested to remember vocabulary. The
second highest score was 3.7 in question (4). Learners felt that these reading texts
were fairly useful but at the same time, the score of question (3) was marked the lowest,
suggested that their learning might not be enjoyable with reading these texts. In termsof the necessity of increasing vocabulary size, there is no doubt that learners felt theyneeded to learn vocabulary and the materials had the capacity to arouse their motivation.
But in terms of reading for pleasure, it is not surprising that the learners found thereading difficult, because the texts used here were from the newspaper which included
TOEIC vocabulary in them, and their topics are not very familiar. The result ofquestion (6) and (7) showed some discrepancy. The figure suggests that whereas
learners wanted to use these texts next year, they also felt that there must be better

13materials.
The learners were also asked to answer the following questions from (8) to (10) andgive their reasons and comments.
Table 11 Results of Fill-in Type Questions
Questions

Answers(8) About how many pages do you really study hard?

Mean: 30.6 out of 60 texts(9) About how many minutes do you spend studying this material?

Mean: 12.9 minutes(10) Which do you think is better for learning words, (a) vocabulary list

The number of learners

book, (b) reading texts or (c) difficult to answer.

(a) 12, (b) 35, (c) 38

The figures in (8) and (9) showed that the learners were studying seriously about 30
out of 60 texts, and spending about 13 minutes reading each text. This result indicatedthat they specially focused on the words which were colored and not on all thesentences, because it would be difficult to understand the passage in such a short time.
The answers in (10) presented that three times as many learners chose (b) reading texts
is than chose (a) vocabulary list book, but more than half the learners chose (c) difficult
to answer. The main comments by the learners who chose reading texts and those whochose vocabulary list book are shown in Table 13.
Table 13 Comments about Reading Texts and Vocabulary List Book
Reading texts

Vocabulary list book

“Important words for the TOEIC test are“It is easy to look up words.”

recycled.”“I can learn the words in context.”“It contains many words.”“Words in color are the key to understanding“It has direct translation and easy to know the meanings

the contents of information,”while reading texts do not have direct translation.”“I can learn not only important words but also

“It is easy to use because I do not have to access a

I can gain knowledge on a variety of topics.”

computer.”“This is good for reading as well as for“Several meanings are presented for each word.”

vocabulary.”“I think it is more practical for learning
vocabulary for the TOEIC test.”“It gives me an opportunity to work on myself
and this helped me with improving my
proficiency.”

14

In a practical sense there may be pros and cons in both materials. Comments
indicate that learners who chose (a) vocabulary list book tend to use it as a dictionary.
On the other hand, learners who chose (b) reading texts tend to use them for vocabulary
learning aids and for improving general English proficiency. Learners who chose (3)difficult to answer seem to flexibly use the materials depending on their purposes.
One of the learners who chose (c) difficult to answer commented that both materials arehelpful to learn vocabulary.
Prospective readers of these reading materials were people who have learned a basic
level of high frequency words and already acquired reading skills. For the learners
who have just started learning English, word lists may be a useful tool to learn new
words.
6.

Conclusion
This research investigated the effect of corpus-based reading texts in learners'
vocabulary development for the TOEIC test. The approach we used was to recycle andreinforce frequent vocabulary in context to get learners’ attention. We showed thesyllabus designs of how we used reading texts in and outside of the classroom. We
also presented the test design of how we selected the words for the vocabulary retention
test. The result of the pre/post reading tests showed that vocabulary learning enhanced
general reading comprehension. The result of the retention test showed that reading
texts is more efficient and effective to remember vocabulary compared with avocabulary list book. The results of the questionnaires showed that reading texts
promotes a positive attitude toward reading even though it is not very easy. The
challenges that teachers and learners may encounter when using the reading texts andhow they are dealt with were also addressed.
This way of creating our vocabulary learning materials and presenting it on the Web
in this study can be applied for any kind of specialized fields, such as medicine,engineering, architectures and chemical, and it would contribute to fostering learners’
vocabulary learning more efficiently. Considering the burden that learners feel whenlearning English, this way of creating materials based on statistical and objective corpus
data is absolutely necessary and it is the role of teachers and material writers to selectvocabulary and reduce the learning burden which many learners have.
Our vocabulary learning Web site, VOCABRIDGE, is now available on the internet.

15

References
Chujo, K. (2003). Eigo shokyuushamuke TOEIC goi 1 & 2 no sentei to sono kouka[Selecting “TOEIC vocabulary 1 & 2” for beginning level students and measuring its
effect on a sample TOEIC test]. Journal of the College of Industrial Technology, Nihon
University, 36, 27-42.
Chujo, K., Ushida, A., Yamazaki, M., Genung, A., Uchibori, A., & Nishigaki, C.
(2004). Bijuaru beishikku niyoru TOEIC-yoo goiryoku yoosei sofutowuea no shisaku(3) [The development of English CD-ROM material to teach vocabulary for the TOEIC
test (utilizing Visual Basic): Part 3]. Journal of the College of Industrial Technology,
Nihon University, 37, 29-43.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework formemory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words
in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 268-284.
Ellis, R. (1995). Modified oral input and the acquisition of word meanings. Applied
Linguistics, 16, 409-441.
Fanselow, J. (1992). Try the opposite. Tokyo: Simul Press.
Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning
through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225-241.
Gardner, D. (2004). Vocabulary input through extensive reading: A comparison ofwords found in children’s narrative and expository reading materials. Applied
Linguistics, 25, 1-37.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research.
TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375-406.
Kennedy, G. (1987a). Expressing temporal frequency in academic English. TESOL
Quarterly, 21, 69-86.
Kennedy, G. (1987b). Quantification and the use of English: A case study of one
aspect of the learner's task. Applied Linguistics, 8, 264-286.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don’tknow, words you think you know, words you can’t guess. In J. Coady and T. Huckin(Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.20-34). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2
written production. Applied Linguistics, 16, 307-322.
Nagy, W. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second-language vocabulary
learning. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition

16

and pedagogy (pp. 64-83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury
House Publishers.
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. In J. Coady and T.
Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.238-254). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nation I. S. P., & Warning, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists.
In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition andpedagogy (pp.6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’ Dell, F. (1997). Incorporating vocabulary into the syllabus. In N. Schmitt and M.
McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.258-278).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities andreading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady and T.
Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy
vocabulary (pp.174-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Qian, D. D. (1996). ESL vocabulary acquisition: Contextualization andDecontextualization. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 120-142.
Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language
Learning, 45, 283-331.
Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’
incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 21, 589-619.
Utiyama, M., Tanimura, M., & Isahara, H. (2004). Constructing English reading
courseware. PACLIC-18, 173-179.
from http://www2.nict.go.jp/jt/a132/members/mutiyama/pdf/reading-paclic18.pdf
Sources for World Wide Web
VOCABRIDGE
http://www.kotonoba.net/~mutiyama/vocabridge/
The Daily Yomiuri database purchase
http://ndk.co.jp/yomiuri/kijideta/guidance/index.html

17

Appendix
JACET
Rank

Words

Lists

Texts

1000 DISTANT○

×2000 AFTERWARD○

×0 DEAL×○2000 COMPOSE○

×

0 AHEAD×○2000 EMPHASIZE○

×

0 TOTAL×○2000 LITERALLY○×

0 DIRECTOR

×○2000 AWKWARD○

×0 GUIDE×○

3000 ABUSE○

×1000 SECURITY

×○3000 EXPENDITURE○

×1000 QUARTER

×○3000 ACCUSE○×1000 NEARBY

×○3000 GENUINE○

×1000 CHAIN

×○3000 COMPROMISE○

×1000 AIRPORT×○

0 FIGURE○○

2000 SPECIALIST×○

0 INDIVIDUAL○○

2000 USER

×○0 EXPRESS○○

2000 PRIORITY

×○

0 CROWD○○

2000 CONSULTANT

×○

0 OPERATION○○

2000 WEEKLY

×○1000 CHARGE○○

3000 REQUIREMENT

×○1000 RESPONSIBLE○○

3000 CONVERT×○1000 EXPORT○○

3000 ALLOWANCE

×○1000 ORGANIZE○○

3000 INADEQUATE×○1000 OBTAIN○○

3000 ANALYST×○2000 TRANSFER○○

0 PUBLIC○

×2000 APPLICATION○○

0 DESIGN○

×2000 URBAN○○

0 COMMUNITY○

×2000 APPROVE○○

0 SPREAD○

×2000 PARTICIPATE○○

0 FREEDOM○

×3000 PROCEDURE○○

1000 BREATH○

×3000 REASONABLE○○

1000 DESPITE○

×

3000 WITHDRAW○○

1000 IMPRESSION○

×3000 APPROXIMATELY○○

1000 PERSUADE○

×3000 ANTICIPATE○○