（公 3-02）

輸送貨物の事故情報に関するデータベース

報 告 書2024 年 3 月 31 日

一般社団法人

日本海事検定協会

NIPPON KAIJI KENTEI (THAILAND) LIMITED

1/2

I. DATABASE OF DAMAGE CARGO (Data Analysis of 2021)（NIPPON KAIJI KENTEI (THAILAND) LIMITED）

2/2

31 MARCH 2024

DATABASE OF DAMAGE CARGODATA ANALYSIS OF 2021

PRODUCED BYNKKTCONTENTS
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2

2. Database Subject ........................................................................................................... 2

3. Database Categories ................................................................................................... 2-4

4. Details damage case based on cargo types

1. Summary of Type of damage in 2021...................................................................... 52. Food ........................................................................................................................ 6-73. Machinery ............................................................................................................. 8-104. Paper .................................................................................................................. 11-125. Chemical Product ............................................................................................. 13-15

6. Metal Material .................................................................................................. 16-17

7. Steel .................................................................................................................. 18-19

8. Electric Product .................................................................................................. 20-21

9. Agricultural Product ......................................................................................... 22-23

10. Medial Product ............................................................................................... 24-25

11. Plastic ............................................................................................................. 26-27-1-1. Introduction
The purpose of this database is to organize past accident information, analyze the type ofdamaged cargo, accident characteristics and trends, cause of accident, etc., examine theaccident countermeasures.

2. Database Subject
The subject in this database included damage cases in 2021, which were carried as directly
request or as a third-party inspection agency for import shipment, and we extracted andanalyzed it, mainly for container cargo.
This database consists of data collected under the above conditions, and it is only a reference
value because it is a part of import cargo accidents and is not complete.
In addition, this data does not represent the frequency of accidents in cargo imported intoThailand, as it only contains information on accidents which have been inspected by NKKT.

3. Database Categories
Transportation method:-Vessel-Flight-Train-

Truck-

Other Method

-

Food-

Machinery-

Paper-

Chemical Product-

Metal Material-

Steel-

Electrical Product-

Agricultural Product-

Medical Item-

Plastic

Cargo Categories:-2-

Packages:-Bare-

Wooden Case-

Bag-

Carton-Palletized-

Drum-Bulk-Roll-

Bundle-Steel Case-

Aluminate Sheet

Location where damage occurred:-

Storage at Loading Port-

Loading Operation-

Vanning Operation-

Inland Transportation-

In Transit-

Transshipping-

Unloading Operation-

Devanning Operation-

Storage at Discharging Port-

Storage at Airport-

During Processing-

Deformed-

Leakage-Torn-

Wet by Sea Water-

Wet by Fresh Water-

Humidity and/or Temperature change gap-

Molded-Rusted-Stained-Oxidized-

Contaminated-

DeterioratedDamage type:

-3-

-

Missing/Non-delivery/Pilferage-

Operation Failure/Malfunction-Burnt-

Quality Degraded-

Discrepancy-

Melted/Thaw-

Impact/Shock during transportation-

Rough handling-Container sustained damage/malfunction-

Poor Lashing-

Improper Stowage/Loading-

Poor cleaning

-

Fire-

Rise in Temperature-

Humidity change/Temperature change gap-

Cargo nature-

Vessel/Container Submerge

-

Thief

-

Defective cargo hold-

Improper Storage-

Delay of the vessel

Cause of damage:-4-

4. Detail damage case based on cargo types
1. Summary of Type of Damage in 2021
Type of Damage

Ratio

Contaminated

7.13%

Deformed43.21%

Deteriorated

5.35%

Discrepancy

0.22%

Leakage

0.89%

Missing/Non-delivery/Pilferage

0.22%

Molded2.23%

Operation Failure/Malfunction

0.67%

Quality Degraded

0.89%

Rusted

9.35%

Stained

1.56%

Torn

7.13%

Wet by Fresh Water

18.04%

Wet by Sea Water

1.11%

Humidity and/or Temperature change

1.34%

gap
Melted/Thaw

0.45%

Burnt

0.22%
Total

100.00%

Table 1: Summary of Type of damage in 2022
Wet by Sea Water
1%

Humidity and/orMelted/Thaw
Burnt
Temperature change
0%
gap
0%
1%

Wet by Fresh Water
18%

Deformed
43%

Torn7%

Stained2%
Rusted9%Quality Degraded
1%
Operation
Failure/Malfunction
1%
Molded2%

Missing/Nondelivery/Pilferage0%

Contaminated7%

Leakage1%

Discrepancy
0%Chart 1: Summary of Type of damage in 2022
-5-Deteriorated
5%2. Food[2-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

3.33%

Deteriorated

70.00%

Missing/Non-delivery/Pilferage

3.33%

Molded

16.67%

Quality Degraded3.33%

Wet by Sea Water

3.33%
Total

100.00%

Table 2-1: Type of damage to Food cargo

Wet by Sea Water
3%
Quality Degraded3%

Deformed
4%

Molded17%
Missing/Nondelivery/Pilferage3%

Deteriorated70%

Chart 2-1: Type of damage to Food cargo[2-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

In Transit

90.00%

Storage at Loading Port

6.67%

Vanning Operation

3.33%
Total

100.00%

Table 2-2: Location of damage occurred of Food cargo-6-Storage at Loading

Vanning Operation

Port3%

7%

In Transit
90%

Chart 2-2: Location of damage occurred of Food cargo[2-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Cargo nature

13.33%

Container sustained damage/malfunction

63.33%

Defective cargo hold

3.33%

Impact/Shock during transportation

3.33%

Rise in Temperature

10.00%

Rough handling

3.33%

Thief

3.33%
Total

100.00%

Table 2-3: Cause of damage of Food cargo
Rise in Temperature Rough handling Thief
3%
3%
10%
Impact/Shock duringtransportation
3%

Cargo nature
14%

Defective cargo hold3%

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
64%

Chart 2-3: Cause of damage of Food cargo-7-3. Machinery[3-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Contaminated

1.10%

Deformed

62.64%

Molded3.30%

Operation Failure/Malfunction

1.10%

Quality Degraded

1.10%

Rusted3.30%

Stained3.30%

Torn3.30%

Wet by Fresh Water16.48%

Wet by Sea Water

1.10%

Humidity and/or Temperature change gap

3.30%

Total

100.00%

Table 3-1: Type of damage to Machinery cargo

Humidity and/orTemperature changegap
3%

Wet by Sea Water
1%
Wet by Fresh Water
17%
Torn
Stained3%
3%
Rusted3%
Quality Degraded
1%
Operation
Failure/Malfunction
1%

Contaminated1%

Deformed
63%
Molded4%

Chart 3-1: Type of damage to Machinery cargo-8-[3-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

9.89%

In Transit

45.05%

Inland Transportation

7.69%

Loading Operation

1.10%

Storage at Airport

4.40%

Storage at Discharging Port

1.10%

Storage at Loading Port

4.40%

Unloading Operation

2.20%

Vanning Operation

4.40%

During Processing

19.78%
Total

100.00%

Table 3-2: Location of damage occurred of Machinery cargo

Vanning Operation
4%
Unloading Operation
2%

Devanning Operation
10%

During Processing
20%

Storage at Loading Port
4%
Storage at Discharging
Port
1%
Storage at Airport
5%
Loading Operation
1%

In Transit
45%
Inland Transportation
8%

Chart 3-2: Location of damage occurred of Machinery cargo-9-[3-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

CaseRatio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

1010.99%

Defective cargo hold11.10%

Humidity change/Temperature change gap

88.79%

Impact/Shock during transportation

2426.37%

Improper Storage1415.38%

Improper Stowage/Loading

11.10%

Poor cleaning

33.30%

Poor Lashing

22.20%

Rough handling28

30.77%

91

100.00%

Total

Table 3-3: Cause of damage of Machinery cargo

Rough handling
31%

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
11%

Defective cargo hold1%
Humiditychange/Temperaturechange gap
9%Poor Lashing2%
Poor cleaning
3%
ImproperStowage/Loading1%

Impact/Shock duringtransportation
26%
Improper Storage
16%

Chart 3-3: Cause of damage of Machinery cargo-10-4. Paper[4-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Contaminated

5.26%

Deformed

21.05%

Torn

36.84%

Wet by Fresh Water

36.84%
Total

100.00%

Table 4-1: Type of damage of Paper cargo

Contaminated5%
Wet by Fresh Water
37%

Deformed
21%

Torn37%

Chart 4-1: Type of damage of Paper cargo[4-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

10.53%In Transit

47.37%

Inland Transportation

5.26%

Storage at Discharging Port

5.26%

Storage at Loading Port

5.26%

Vanning Operation

21.05%

During Processing

5.26%
Total

100.00%

Table 4-2: Location of damage occurred of Paper cargo-11-During Processing
5%

Devanning Operation
11%

Vanning Operation
21%
Storage at Loading Port
5%

Storage at Discharging
Port5%In Transit
48%

Inland Transportation
5%

Chart 4-2: Location of damage occurred of Paper cargo[4-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

31.58%

Impact/Shock during transportation

15.79%

Improper Storage

10.53%

Poor cleaning

5.26%

Rough handling36.84%
Total

100.00%

Table 4-3: Cause of damage of Paper cargo

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
32%

Rough handling
37%

Poor cleaning
5%

Impact/Shock duringtransportation
16%

Improper Storage
10%

Chart 4-3: Cause of damage of Paper cargo-12-5. Chemical Product[5-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

11.54%

Deteriorated

3.85%

Discrepancy

3.85%

Leakage15.38%

Molded3.85%

Rusted

7.69%

Torn

15.38%

Wet by Fresh Water

26.92%

Humidity and/or Temperature change gap

3.85%

Melted/Thaw

7.69%
Total

100.00%

Table 5-1: Type of damage of Chemical Product

Melted/Thaw
8%Humidity and/or
Temperature change
gap
4%

Deformed
11%

Deteriorated
4%
Discrepancy
4%

Wet by Fresh Water
27%

Leakage
15%

Molded4%
Rusted8%

Torn15%Chart 5-1: Type of damage of Chemical Product-13-[5-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

7.69%

In Transit

53.85%

Inland Transportation

11.54%

Storage at Loading Port

3.85%

Vanning Operation

23.08%
Total

100.00%

Table 5-2: Location of damage occurred of Chemical ProductDevanning Operation
8%

Vanning Operation
23%
Storage at Loading Port
4%

Inland Transportation
11%

In Transit
54%

Chart 5-2: Location of damage occurred of Chemical Product-14-[5-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Cargo nature

7.69%

Container sustained damage/malfunction

15.38%

Humidity change/Temperature change gap

11.54%

Impact/Shock during transportation

15.38%

Improper Storage

7.69%

Improper Stowage/Loading

3.85%

Rise in Temperature

11.54%

Rough handling26.92%
Total

100.00%

Table 5-3: Cause of damage of Chemical Product
Cargo nature
8%

Rough handling27%

Container sustaineddamage/malfunction
15%

Humiditychange/Temperaturechange gap
11%

Rise in Temperature
12%

ImproperStowage/Loading
Improper Storage
4%8%

Impact/Shock duringtransportation
15%

Chart 5-3: Cause of damage of Chemical Product-15-6. Metal Material[6-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

50.00%

Rusted14.29%

Torn

14.29%

Wet by Fresh Water

21.43%
Total

100.00%

Table 6-1: Type of damage of Metal Material

Wet by Fresh Water
22%

Deformed
50%

Torn
14%

Rusted14%

Chart 6-1: Type of damage of Metal Material[6-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

35.71%In Transit

42.86%

Inland Transportation

7.14%

Storage at Discharging Port

7.14%

Storage at Loading Port

7.14%

Total

100.00%

Table 6-2: Location of damage occurred of Metal Material-16-Storage at Discharging
Port7%

Storage at Loading Port
7%
Devanning Operation
36%

Inland Transportation
7%

In Transit
43%

Chart 6-2: Location of damage occurred of Metal Material[6-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

14.29%

Humidity change/Temperature change gap

21.43%

Rough handling64.29%
Total

100.00%

Table 6-3: Cause of damage of Metal Material
Container sustaineddamage/malfunction
14%

Humiditychange/Temperaturechange gap
22%
Rough handling
64%

Chart 6-3: Cause of damage of Metal Material-17-7. Steel[7-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

59.71%

Rusted25.18%

Stained

2.16%

Torn

3.60%

Wet by Fresh Water

7.19%

Humidity and/or Temperature change gap

1.44%

Burnt

0.72%
Total

100.00%

Table 7-1: Type of damage of Steel cargo

Torn
4%

Wet by Fresh Water
7%

Humidity and/or
Temperature changegap
1%

Burnt
1%

Stained2%

Rusted25%

Deformed
60%

Chart 7-1: Type of damage of Steel cargo[7-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

2.88%

In Transit

85.61%

Inland Transportation

0.72%

Loading Operation

1.44%

Storage at Airport

0.72%

Storage at Discharging Port

2.88%

Storage at Loading Port

1.44%

Unloading Operation

0.72%

Vanning Operation

3.60%
Total

100.00%

Table 7-2: Location of damage occurred of Steel cargo-18-Storage at Loading Port
Unloading Operation
1%
1%
Storage at Discharging
Port
3%

Vanning Operation
3%

Devanning Operation
3%

Storage at Airport
1%
Loading Operation
1%
Inland Transportation
1%

In Transit
86%

Chart 7-2: Location of damage occurred of Steel cargo[7-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Cargo nature

2.16%

Container sustained damage/malfunction

7.91%

Humidity change/Temperature change gap

9.35%

Impact/Shock during transportation

8.63%

Improper Storage

15.83%

Rough handling55.40%

Fire

0.72%
Total

100.00%

Table 7-3: Cause of damage of Steel cargo

Fire1%

Cargo nature
2%

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
8%
Humiditychange/Temperaturechange gap
9%Rough handling
55%

Impact/Shock duringtransportation
9%
Improper Storage
16%

Chart 7-3: Cause of damage of Steel cargo-19-8. Electric Product[8-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Contaminated

1.52%

Deformed

48.48%

Operation Failure/Malfunction

3.03%

Torn

3.03%

Wet by Fresh Water

42.42%

Wet by Sea Water

1.52%
Total

100.00%

Table 8-1: Type of damage of Electric productContaminated2%

Wet by Sea Water
2%
Wet by Fresh Water
42%

Deformed48%
Torn3%

Operation
Failure/Malfunction
3%

Chart 8-1: Type of damage of Electric product[8-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

10.61%In Transit

22.73%

Inland Transportation

10.61%

Storage at Airport

43.94%

Storage at Loading Port

1.52%

Transshipping

4.55%

Unloading Operation

1.52%

Vanning Operation

3.03%

During Processing

1.52%
Total

100.00%

Table 8-2: Location of damage occurred of Electric product-20-Unloading Operation
1%

Vanning Operation
3%

During Processing Devanning Operation
1%
11%

Transshipping
5%

In Transit
23%

Storage at Loading Port
1%

Storage at Airport
44%

Inland Transportation
11%

Chart 8-2: Location of damage occurred of Electric product[8-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

10.71%

Humidity change/Temperature change gap

7.14%

Impact/Shock during transportation

8.93%

Improper Stowage/Loading

1.79%

Rough handling71.43%
Total

100.00%

Table 8-3: Cause of damage of Electric productContainer sustained
damage/malfunction
11%

Humiditychange/Temperaturechange gap
7%Impact/Shock duringtransportation
9%
ImproperStowage/Loading
2%

Rough handling
71%

Chart 8-3: Cause of damage of Electric product-21-9. Agricultural Product[9-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Contaminated79.41%

Deteriorated

5.88%

Quality Degraded

5.88%

Torn

2.94%

Wet by Sea Water

5.88%
Total

100.00%

Table 9-1: Type of damage of Agricultural ProductWet by Sea Water
6%

Torn3%

Quality Degraded
6%
Deteriorated
6%

Contaminated79%

Chart 9-1: Type of damage of Agricultural Product[9-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

In Transit

35.29%

Loading Operation

5.88%

Unloading Operation

58.82%
Total

100.00%

Table 9-2: Location of damage occurred of Agricultural Product-22-In Transit
35%

Unloading Operation
59%
Loading Operation
6%

Chart 9-2: Location of damage occurred of Agricultural Product[9-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Cargo nature

11.76%

Defective cargo hold26.47%

Improper Stowage/Loading

2.94%

Poor cleaning

5.88%

Rough handling52.94%
Total

100.00%

Table 9-3: Cause of damage of Agricultural Product
Cargo nature
12%

Defective cargo hold
26%

Rough handling
53%

Poor cleaning
6%

Chart 9-4: Cause of damage of Agricultural Product-23-

ImproperStowage/Loading3%10. Medical Item
[10-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

33.33%

Molded

16.67%

Torn

16.67%

Wet by Fresh Water

33.33%
Total

100.00%

Table 10-1: Type of damage of Medical Item

Wet by Fresh Water
33%

Deformed
33%

Molded
17%Torn17%

Chart 10-1: Type of damage of Medical Item

[10-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

In Transit

50.00%

Storage at Loading Port

16.67%

Vanning Operation

33.33%
Total

100.00%

Table 10-2: Location of damage occurred of Medical Item

-24-Vanning Operation
33%

In Transit
50%

Storage at Loading Port
17%

Chart 10-2: Location of damage occurred of Medical Item

[10-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

33.33%

Poor cleaning

16.67%

Rough handling50.00%
Total

100.00%

Table 10-3: Cause of damage of Medical Item

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
33%

Rough handling
50%

Poor cleaning
17%

Chart 10-3: Cause of damage of Medical Item-25-11. Plastic Product[11-1] Type of damage
Type of Damage

Ratio

Deformed

13.33%

Stained

6.67%

Torn

40.00%

Wet by Fresh Water

40.00%
Total

100.00%

Table 11-1: Type of damage of Plastic productDeformed
13%
Stained7%

Wet by Fresh Water40%

Torn40%Chart 11-1: Type of damage of Plastic product[11-2] Location of damage occurredOccurred location

Ratio

Devanning Operation

6.67%

In Transit

13.33%Loading Operation

6.67%

Storage at Airport

13.33%

Storage at Discharging Port

26.67%

Unloading Operation

6.67%

Vanning Operation

20.00%

During Processing

6.67%
Total

100.00%

Table 11-2: Location of damage occurred of Plastic product-26-Devanning Operation
6%

During Processing
7%

In Transit
13%

Vanning Operation
20%

Loading Operation
7%

Unloading Operation
7%

Storage at Airport
13%
Storage at Discharging
Port27%

Chart 11-2: Location of damage occurred of Plastic product[11-3] Cause of damage
Cause of damage

Ratio

Container sustained damage/malfunction

13.33%

Improper Storage

20.00%Poor cleaning

6.67%

Rough handling53.33%

Vessel/Container Submerge

6.67%

Total

100.00%

Table 11-3: Cause of damage of Plastic product

Vessel/Container
Submerge
7%

Container sustained
damage/malfunction
13%
Improper Storage
20%

Rough handling
53%

Poor cleaning
7%

Chart 11-3: Cause of damage of Plastic product-27-