JCIA
ANNUALREPORT
2022

This pamphlet serves as a supplement to the JCIA
Annual Report to introduce various data and initiatives relating to the activities of JCIA. It is intended
to be read together with JCIA Annual Report 2022.

一般社団法人 日本化学工業協会
Japan Chemical Industry Association
Japan Chemical Industry Association

Reference
Materials

CONTENTS
Environmental Protection(Prevention of Global Warming) 

1-1

Environmental Protection(Industrial Waste Reduction) 

1-2

Environmental Protection(Prevention of Atmospheric Pollution andWater Pollution) 

1-3

Environmental Protection(Reduction of Chemical Emissions) 

1-4

Environmental Protection(Investment in Environmental Measures) 

1-5

1

1

2
3
4
4

2

Process Safety and Disaster Prevention(Efforts to Prevent Plant Accidents) 3Industrial Health and Safety 

54Social (Regional) Dialogue 

65Members’ Self-Assessment 

6

6

Responsible Care Verification 

65

Environmental Protection (Prevention of Global Warming)

CO2 Emissions Index

CO2 Emissions Index(one million tons)

CO2 emissions of JCIA members have been
decreasing with each passing year since
the “Commitment to a Low Carbon Society”
activities began in FY2013, with emissions
dropping by 11.8 million metric tons (17.2%)
last fiscal year compared to the reference year
of FY2005. In FY2018, JCIA announced a newtarget of reducing the absolute quantity of CO2
emissions before FY2030, by 6.79 million metric tons compared to FY2013. Although emissions in FY2021 were higher than in FY2020,
when emissions fell significantly due to theimpact of stagnant economic activity causedby the COVID-19 pandemic. JCIA members reduced CO2 emissions by 1.82 million tons from
FY2018, resulting in a total reduction of 6.88
million tons. As a result, JCIA also achieved its
target for 2030 ahead of schedule in 2021.

70

69

65
Reduced by 6.79 million
metric tons

60
57

57

2021

2030
Target55

50 2005

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

(Base year)(FY)(FY2021 data are finalized values. Participating companies and associations: 274 companies, 2 associations.)

Emissions of CO2 and Three Alternatives to Freon

Emissions of CO2 andThree Alternatives to Freon

CO2 emissions: Energy source CO2 emissions（％）

Emissions of PFCS and others: CO2e*2 emissions of three alternatives to Freon

120

100

15%
80

60

40

20

0 Base year*1

2005

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021
(FY)

*1 Base years: The base year for CO2 emissions is FY1990; the base year for estimated emissions associated with
manufacturing of PFCs and others is 1995 (calendar year)*2 CO2e (CO2 equivalent): Corresponding value of CO2 emissions

1

1

JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

When the reductions of CO2 emissions andemissions from the manufacture of three alternatives to Freon (PFCS, SF6, NF3) are combined, emissions in 2021 were down 15% fromthe base years.
From 2021 onward, the global warming potential is based on the IPCC Fifth Report (AR5).

12

Environmental Protection (Industrial Waste Reduction)

Voluntary Action Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society for FY2021 and Beyond

tion of the final disposal volume may run counter to the realization ofa low-carbon society, for example, by increasing energy consumption.
Even under these circumstances, Keidanren will continue its efforts
to reduce the volume of final disposal of industrial waste, the mostrepresentative indicator for industry in the formation of a Sound Material-Cycle Society, by setting a reduction target for industry as a whole,
based on the idea of not increasing the volume of final disposal fromthe current level.

Since FY2016, JCIA has been working to achieve the target of reducing final disposal volume by about 70% in FY2020 compared to
FY2000*1 in accordance with the Keidanren voluntary Action Plan for
Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society and we have been promoting efforts to achieve this goal. On the other hand, the recycling
rate of industrial waste has already reached close to 100%, and somewaste is difficult to recycle. As a result, the recycling rate has remained
almost flat since 2010. It has also been pointed out that further reduc-*1 Final disposal amount reduction rate (vs. FY2000):
FY2000 final disposal amount – FY2020 final disposal amount
FY2000 final disposal amount≒ 70％

Therefore, JCIA has set the following new targets for FY2025:

Reduce final landfill volume of industrial waste to170,000 tons/year or less; andMaintain the recycling rate at 65% or higher,
and continues to work toward maintaining the current level.

Industrial Waste Volume andEffective Resource Utilization Ratio*2

Industrial Waste Volume and Effective Resource Utilization Ratio
Effective resource utilization ratio

Industrial waste volume(1,000 tons/year)

8,000

6,000

71
6,151

80

60

43

3,898

4,000

40

20

2,000

0

（％）

100

10,000

2000

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Data is reviewed annually.

2020

2021

0

(FY)
(79 survey-responding companies)*2 Effective utilization rate (including heat recovery):Effective use of resources in the same FY≧ 65%
Amount of industrial waste

Final Landfill Disposal Volume(1,000 tons/year)

1,000

Ratio to FY 2000

Final landfill disposal volume

100

100

80

800

600

（％）

60

548

400

30

200

0 2000

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Data is reviewed annually.

2020

164

20

2021

0

(FY)
(79 survey-responding companies)

FY2021 results
Relative to FY2000

40

Relative to FY2020

Industrial waste volume

37% decrease

4% increase

Effective resource utilization ratio

28% increase

marginal change

Final disposal by JCIA members

70% decrease

11% increase

Industrial waste volume in FY2021 was 3.898
million metric tons, down 37% from the baseyear of FY2000. We are also making positiveefforts to encourage sorting and reuse. In addition, the effective utilization rate of resources
including heat recovery, which had been 43%
in FY2000, improved to 71% in FY2021 by
not only strengthening recycling with thoroughsorting of the materials but also aggressively
switching from simple incineration to heat recovery for items that are difficult to recycle. As
a result, JCIA members achieved a level that
greatly exceeds the chemical industry’s specific target of increasing the ratio to 65% or more
by FY2025*2 in the Keidanren Voluntary Action
Plan for Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle
Society ahead of schedule.

Final Landfill Disposal Volume
The final landfill disposal of FY2021 was
164,000 tons, which is about an 17,000ton increase from FY2020, which ended in a
70% reduction from the base year FY2000.
In FY2019, domestic disposal volume temporarily increased due to import restrictions on
waste plastics enforced in Asian countries. In
FY2020, there was a significant decrease dueto the reduced economic activity caused by
COVID-19. In FY2021, the trend returned toflat to slightly decreasing seen up to 2018 prior
to the pandemic. Not only did JCIA members
achieve the target for the chemical industry,
namely reduce final landfill volume of industrial
waste to 170,000 tons/year or less by FY2025,
as per the Keidanren Voluntary Action Plan for
Establishing a Sound Material-Cycle Society,but the reduction also helped lower waste incineration volume. In additioin to reducing thefinal landfill disposal volume, member companies are strengthening their traceability concerning proper disposal of waste, through confirming the issuance, recovery and verificationof industrial waste manifestos, and the regularinspection of final disposal sites of contractors.

JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

2

1

3

Environmental Protection (Prevention of Atmospheric Pollution and Water Pollution)

Prevention of Atmospheric Pollution and Water Pollution
JCIA members in Japan have significantly reduced their emissions of air and water pollutants compared to around 2000. In recent years, the rate ofemissions reduction has slowed, but emissions intensity has been declining. JCIA members comply both with regulatory standards and agreementswith municipalities. They also set their own voluntary management criteria, which are more rigorous than government standards, to intensify their ongoing efforts to reduce emissions.

NOx Emissions

SOx Emissions
NOx emissions(1,000 tons/year)

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (kg/1 mil. yen)

100
80
60

5.0
4.0

3.36
623

40

2.66

3.0

56.4

2.0

20
0

81

83

76

75

76

77

77

80

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Dust emissions

20.7

20
1.30

0

(FY)

0.98

81

83

76

75

76

76

75

78

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

COD emissions

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (g/1 mil. yen)

3.0

150
106

(1,000 tons/year)

25

2.0
1.0
0.0

(FY)

1.5
80

82

75

74

72

72

72

74

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

100

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (kg/1 mil. yen)

1.0

0.83

20
15

73

2.0

1.0

0.64

15.5

13.7

0.8
0.6

10

0.4

50

5

0.2

0

0

81

83

76

75

77

77

77

81

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

(FY)

Total Nitrogen Emissions

0.0

(FY)

Total Phosphorous Emissions

Total nitrogen emissions(1,000 tons/year)

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (kg/1 mil. yen)

50
1.13
0.93

30
19.7

76

78

71

70

70

70

70

74

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021
(FY)

Total phosphorous emissions(1,000 tons/year)

1.5

1.0

1.2

0.8

0.9
21.1

10
0

3.0
24.2

0.0

200

20

30

10

4.0

40

4.0

COD Emissions(1,000 tons/year)

0.0

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (kg/1 mil. yen)

40

1.0

Dust Emissions

2.0

SOx emissions(1,000 tons/year)

0.6

Emission intensity

Emission intensity* (g/1 mil. yen)

50
40

34.4

28.6

0.64

30

0.61
0.6

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.0

0.0

20
10

76

78

71

70

70

70

70

74

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

0.0

(FY)

*Emission intensity: Emissions per ¥1 million sales. The figures in the bars indicate the number of companies that submitted data.

3

JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

1

Environmental Protection (Reduction of Chemical Emissions)4

Emissions of PRTR Substances
Atmosphere(1,000 tons/year)

Water

Soil

60
50 46.1
40
30
20

7.7

10

Emissions of PRTR*1 Substances
JCIA members' emissions of PRTR designated substances in FY2021 was 7,700 metric tons,
a reduction of approximately 83% compared to FY2000 and 54% compared to FY2010. Theseemissions have been declining every year since FY2014 and JCIA members achieved their voluntary target*3 for FY2025. The breakdown of emissions is as follows: 91% into the atmosphere,
9% into water, and less than 0.1% into soil.
*1 PRTR (Pollutant Release and Transfer Register): The PRTR system is designed to identify, collect and disseminate data on theamounts and sources of a variety of toxic chemicals released to the environment or transferred outside of facilities in the formof waste.
PRTR Law: Act on Confirmation, etc. of Release Amounts of Specific Chemical Substances in the Environment andPromotion of Improvements to the Management Thereof

0 20002014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(FY)

Emissions of Voluntary Surveyed
Substances
Atmosphere(1,000 tons/year)

Water

Soil

60 55.4
50
40
30

15.8

20
10
0 2000Emissions of Voluntary Surveyed Substances
JCIA has independently established voluntary survey substances(†) and is working to further reduce their emissions. There were 15,800 metric tons of substance emissions surveyed by JCIA
voluntarily(†) in 2021, representing a 71% reduction compared to FY2000 and a 36% reduction
compared to FY2010. JCIA members have continued to reduce the amount since FY2014 andachieved their voluntary target for FY2025*3. The breakdown of emissions was 92% into the atmosphere and 8% into water. No emissions into the soil were reported.
(†) C hange in the number of substances voluntarily surveyed by JCIA:
From FY2000 to 2009: 126 substances
From FY2010 to 2012: 106 substances
From FY2013 to the current: 90 substances

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(FY)

VOC*2 Emissions

VOC Emissions(1,000 tons/year)

JCIA members are making tremendous efforts to install equipment and improve the processes
for controlling VOC emissions. In FY2021, VOC emissions amounted to 21,400 metric tons, a
76% reduction compared to FY2000 and a 37% reduction compared to FY2010. Thus, JCIA
members have achieved significant reductions along with their voluntary target for FY2025*3.

100 90.2
80
60

*2 V
 OC (volatile organic compound): VOC is a collective term for a wide variety of volatile organic compounds that turn into gas
and enter the atmosphere, including toluene, xylenes and ethyl acetate.

40

21.4

20
0

*3 F
 Y2025 voluntary target: Reduce PRTR/VOC emissions to no worse than FY2010 levels in FY2020 and beyond. As for highly
toxic substances, reduction efforts should be continued individually.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(FY)

2000

1

5

Environmental Protection (Investment in Environmental Measures)

Investment in Environmental Measures
In FY2021, the sum of investments by JCIA members in the installation and maintenance of environment-friendly equipment, such as energy-saving
and CO2 reduction equipment, and investments in the development of environment-friendly products and technologies amounted to ¥76.9 billion. This
represents a ratio of investment to sales of 0.36%. While it is estimated that the decrease in investment amount was due to the fact that many construction projects were forced to be canceled or postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the ratio of investment to sales in 2021 remains
about the same as in previous years. The planned investments in environmental protection measures by JCIA members have been steadily improving
their environmental performance.

Investment in Environmental Measures
Environmental investment

Breakdown of Environmental Investment in FY2021
Ratio to sales

800

769

736

0.8

Others

5.2%

Promotion of greenification

0.5%

600

0.6

400

0.4
0.40

0.36

200
0

Soil and ground waterpollution countermeasures 3.0%（％）(¥100 million)

0.2
81

83

76

74

74

76

76

79

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

0.0

(FY)

*Emission intensity: Emissions per ¥1 million sales. The figures in the bars indicate the numberof companies that submitted data.

Measures to prevent noise,
vibration,and offensive odor

Energy-saving
and CO2-reduction
measures2.9%

Measures to reduce emissionsof harmful substances

6.9%

Atmospheric pollution
countermeasures

11%

Industrial waste
and recycling
measures

39%

14%

Water
pollution
countermeasures

17%

JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

4

2 Process Safety and Disaster Prevention
Accident Occurrences

Investment in Safety, Security, and Disaster-Prevention
MeasuresIn FY2021, the total number of accidents at plants (113) and the number of accidents at plants per company (1.40) was lower than the previous year for the first time in four years, but remains high compared tohigh compared to levels several years ago.

JCIA member's investment in safety and disaster-preventive maintenance for FY2021 was 150.5 billion yen, a 17% increase compared withFY2020, with the ratio of investment to sales standing at 0.71%, down
0.05% compared with FY2020. The amount of investment recovered tothe pre-COVID-19 level, but the investment ratio declined slightly.

Investment in Safety, Security,
and Disaster-Prevention Measures

Accident Occurrences
Number of leakage accidents

Number of explosions and fires

Number of plant accidents per company(incidents)

120

80

1.11

20
0

（％）

1,600

1,505 1.6

1.40

1.50

1,400

1.4

80

1.25

1,200

1.2

1,000

1.00

52

33

81

83

77

75

77

77

77

81

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

882

400

0.25

200

0.00

0

0.6
0.4

(FY)

The figures at the bottom of the bars indicate the number of companies that submitted data.

0.8

0.48

600

0.50

1.0

0.71

800

0.75

38

Ratio to sales(¥100 million)

1.75

60
40

Safety and disaster-prevention investment amount(incident/company)

140

100

(Efforts to Prevent Plant Accidents)

78

80

75

73

76

74

76

79

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

0.2
0.0

(FY)

The figures at the bottom of the bars indicate the number of companies that submitted data.

 reakdown of Safety and Disaster-Prevention
B
Investment Amount

Breakdown of Safety and Disaster-Prevention Investment
AmountOthers 9%

Earthquake and other natural disastercountermeasures 8%

The breakdown of investment costs for safety and disaster-preventive maintenance in FY2021 shows that the maintenance for aging facilities accounts
for nearly 60% of this investment. This trend indicates that countermeasures for the aging facilities has been a major investment item over the past
several years.

Explosion, fire,and leakage countermeasures

Measures against
aging of facilities

9%

57%

Measures to improve
work safety andwork environment

3 Industrial Health and Safety17%

Occurrence of Occupational Accidents
Lost Time Injury Rate (LTIR) Trends
Number of lost time injuries
LTIR*1 =Total working hours (per one million hours)

Lost Time Injury Severity Rate* Trends
Number of work days lost
Total work hours (per thousand hours)

Lost Time Injury =Severity Rate*2*1 LTIR: Indicator that shows the frequency of lost time injuries*2 Lost Time Injury Severity Rate: Indicator that shows the severity of occupational accidents

LTIR Trends

Overall Severity Rates

Manufacturing industry*

1.4
1.2
1.0 1.06
0.8 0.76
0.6
0.4 0.43
0.33
0.2
0.0
2014

Chemical industry*

Contractors

Member companies

0.3

1.31
1.07

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Chemical industry*

Contractors

Member companies

0.2 0.20
0.17

0.64
0.41
2015

Manufacturing industry*

0.148

0.12
0.1 0.09
0.0

2021(Calendar year)

2014

0.06
0.02
0.009
2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

(Calendar year)

In 2021, as in 2020, there were two fatal accidents at subcontractors,
so the intensity rate was significantly worse than in 2019, when there
were zero fatal accidents. It was also much higher than in the manufacturing industry and the chemical industry as a whole.

Frequency rates for JCIA members and their subcontractors in 2021
are below those for the manufacturing and chemical industries as awhole, but are trending upward overall.

Number of Fatalities from Occupational Accidents
2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

5

0

0

1

1

0

2

0

Member companies
Contractors

4

1

1

3

1

0

2

2

Chemical industry*

11

22

12

12

18

12

10

12

Manufacturing industry*

180

160

177

102

183

141

136

137

* Data publicly announced by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)

5JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

Number of Fatalities
from Occupational Accidents
In 2021, there were no fatalities due to work-related accidents at JCIA members, but two
fatalities occurred at subcontractors.

4Social (Regional) Dialogue

Implementation of Regional
Dialogue Meetings
JCIA's Responsible Care Committee convened
meetings and maintained dialogue with regional communities once every two years until 2018
in each area where there is a concentration of
JCIA member sites, especially chemical complexes. Due to the impact of COVID-19, manyof the regional dialogue meetings have been
postponed since 2019. In 2021, those scheduled in Yokkaichi, Osaka, Toyama & Takaoka,
Northern Niigata were postponed.

Implementation of Regional Dialogue Meetings
Areas of implementation
in FY2021

Okayama, Western Yamaguchi, Iwakuni & Otake, Sakai& Senboku, Kawasaki, Oita
(All were document-based meetings.)

Areas of implementation
in FY2020

Eastern Yamaguchi, Aichi, Chiba, Hyogo(All were document-based meetings.)

5 Members’ Self-Assessment
Details of Self-Assessment Scores(Average scores reported by JCIA members)

Pink cells are new items from this fiscal year.

Assessed item

Important items

Code
1 Policy
2 Identification of striking environmental aspects,
identification of dangerous and harmful factors, etc.
3 Legal and other requirements
4 Objectives
5 Plans
6 Organization
7 Education and training
8 Communication
9 Response to emergency situations
10 Documentation and document management
11 Operation management
12 Inspection and monitoring
13 Corrections and preventive measures
14 Collection of information and management of records
15 Auditing
16 Revisions by management(Overall assessment)
Abbreviation
CodeMSManagement system

MS
4.6

EP
4.5

PS
4.5

OSH
4.5

DS
4.0

CPS
4.4

4.5

4.5

4.6

4.6

3.8

4.5

-

4.6
4.7
4.6
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.4

4.3
4.1
4.1
3.9
3.8
4.5
4.5
4.3

4.2
4.5
4.4
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.4
4.5
4.4

4.3
4.6
4.4
4.6
4.0
4.4
4.6
4.5

3.8
3.9
3.9
4.0
3.5
4.0
3.7
4.0
3.9

4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
3.5
4.3
4.4
4.2

3.5
3.7
3.7
3.5
3.9
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9

Self-assessment score
4.5 points or overClassification
Very satisfactoryEP
PS

Environmental protection
Process safety and disaster prevention

3.5 to under 4.5 points
2.5 to under 3.5 points

Just about satisfactory
Somewhat unsatisfactory

OSH
DS

Occupational health and safety
Distribution safety

Under 2.5 points

Unsatisfactory

CPS
SD

Chemicals and product safety
Social dialogue

SD
4.3

Details of Self-Assessment Scores(Average scores reported by JCIA
members)
As JCIA revised its RC code for the first timein 20 years this year, the evaluation items andcontents of the self-assessment were also revised.
On a scale of 5, scores in the 4-point range
were recorded for all important items in the categories of management system, process safetyand disaster prevention, and occupational
health and safety, showing that the PDCA cycle is being implemented at a high rate in thesecategories. In the category of environmental
protection, many of JCIA members need to enhance communication and operation management. For logistics safety, issues remain in theidentification of striking environmental aspects,
objectives, plans, education and training, andresponse to emergency situations, and inspection/monitoring, but the rest were in the 4-point
range. Regarding chemical and product safety,
improvement is needed in terms of operation
management. Regarding social dialogue, there
are still many issues to be addressed in all
items except for the policy. The overall lowscore for social dialogue may be due to theimpact of COVID-19 and the inability to create
sufficient opportunities for dialogue.

6 Responsible Care Verification
Companies Undergoing RC Verification

Companies Undergoing Responsible Care (RC) Verification

Verification of actions

In FY2021, 11 JCIA members underwent RC verification (nine companies
for verification of reports, two companies for verification of actions, and one
company for GHG verification). The total number of JCIA members that haveundergone RC verification is 249 (200 companies for verification of reports, 47
companies for verification of actions, and two companies for GHG verification).

Verification of reports

Verification of GHG*

(Number of companies undergoing verification)

15

10

5

0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
(FY)

* GHG: Greenhouse Gas

Verification of reports (Nine companies):
Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd., Asahi Kasei Corporation,
JSR Corporation, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.,
Sumitomo Seika Chemicals Company Ltd., Nippon Soda Co., Ltd.,and Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co., Ltd., Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd.,
Nippon Nyukazai Co., Ltd.
Verification of actions (Two companies):
Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd., Nissan Chemical Corporation.
GHG verification (One company): Earth Corporation.

Please refer to the publications posted on the JCIA website regarding other information such as the aggregate results of the JCIA member questionnaire.

JCIA ANNUAL REPORT 2022 REFERENCES

6

on

ba

St.

en

ter

Lo

shi

op

Nih

Ka

ac

ho

St.

Kao

res

sw

ay

Cit

yC

yab

Exit 3nE

xp

Shinkawa 1-Chome
Intersection

Sh
in O

Me

has
hi D

tro

ori

po

lita

Exit 1

Hatchobori
Intersection

Japan Chemical
Industry Association

Family Mart

Reiganjima Intersection

Sardonyx Tokyo

Exit B1

Hatchobori St.

Access Information
Kayabacho St. (Tokyo Metro Hibiya Line, Tozai Line)
Approximately 3 minutes on foot from Exit 1 or Exit 3
Hatchobori St. (JR Keiyo Line)

Contact
General Affairs Department
TEL 03-3297-2550
FAX 03-3297-2610

Public Relations Department
TEL 03-3297-2555
FAX 03-3297-2615

International Affairs
Department
TEL 03-3297-2576
FAX 03-3297-2612

Department of Business/
Economic Information
TEL 03-3297-2559
FAX 03-3297-2606

Labor Department
TEL 03-3297-2563
FAX 03-3297-2606

Technical Affairs Department
TEL 03-3297-2578
FAX 03-3297-2606

Environment and Safety
Department
TEL 03-3297-2568
FAX 03-3297-2606

Chemicals Management
Department
TEL 03-3297-2567
FAX 03-3297-2612

Responsible Care Department
TEL 03-3297-2583
FAX 03-3297-2615

Chemical Products PL
Consulting Center
TEL 03-3297-2602
FAX 03-3297-2604

JCIA
Annual report
2022

Dream Chemistry 21
Committee
TEL 03-3297-2555
FAX 03-3297-2615

Japan Chemical Industry Association
7F Sumitomo Fudosan Rokko Building, 1-4-1 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0033
TEL 03‐3297‐2555 FAX 03‐3297‐2615

October 23 is

Chemistry Day
https://www.nikkakyo.org/

Nikka-chan:
JCIA’s official character

Published January 2023