Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender
Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

ミリヤナ・モロクワシチ＝ミュラー教授は、パリ第５大学（ルネ・デカルト校）で１
９７
２年に社会学博士号を取得。リール第３大学準教授などを経て、現在はフランス国立科学研究センター教授兼パリ第１０大学教授を務めている。
教育・研究範囲は、フランス、ヨーロッパを越え、北米まで幅広い。２
０
０
０年７
月から１
０月まで、ドイツ・ハノーバーで開催された国際女性大学（IFU）を設
立・実施し、設立以来ヨーロッパ史上初の女性大学運営に深く関わっている。また、１
９８
４年、国際移動研究の代表的学術雑誌 International Migration Review が初の「女性と移動」特集を組んだ際には、編集責任者を務め、巻頭論文も執筆した。
主な著書には、Bridging States and Markets: International Migrations of the Early
Nineties（１９９３）
、Migrants: Les Nouvelles Mobilites en Europe（１９９６）等がある。
２００
１年４月から９月まで、お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究センター外国人客員教授として赴任。本稿は、その間行われた公開講演会で発表された原稿に、加筆修正したものである。

The foreigner here is not the one often described in the past, the traveller who comes today
and goes tomorrow, but the one who comes today and stays tomorrow-a potential migrant so
to say, who, although he has not continued his trail, has not given up the freedom of coming
and going. (Georg Simmel１)
Industrial countries will probably have an irreducible requirement in the years ahead for thekind of employment that immigrants are willing to undertake.

Indeed, if globalisation expands

the number of jobs at the bottom of the employment scale, particularly in services, it could wellincrease the demand for their labour. (Peter Stalker, p. 137)

The redrawing of the map of Europe in the aftermath of the events of 1989 and the collapse of thecommunist regimes involved an unprecedented mobility of persons and heralded a new phase in thehistory of European migrations. The clear distinction between sending and receiving countries has
been blurred with former sending countries emerging simultaneously as receiving, as sending and astransit areas. Furthermore, the former predominantly labour migration pattern has become highly
diversified: shuttle/commuter migrants, refugees, “repatriates,” undocumented and trafficked
migrants are some of the numerically most important categories along with the traditional labourand family migration.

15

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨The new forms of migration are no longer male dominated: the post communist transition has puton the move a great number of women who are looking for an escape either from their new market
conditions or from the newly dominant discourse of nationalist projects in their home countries orare simply attracted by the challenges of the newly acquired freedom of movement.
What are the main trends in this new European migration landscape? How are they shaped by
the global trends world-wide and how gendered is this new migration pattern? What are themigrants’ coping strategies of resistance to ever more restrictive policies?
These are some of the questions I wish to address. To do so, I will first define the terms I am
using in the title. Second, I will argue that the issue I am addressing has to be seen in the global
context of world-wide trends in migration. I will then describe the current diversified pattern of
migrations in Europe, highlighting some gendered dimensions of the trends. Finally I want to reflect
on possible issues for an Asia-Europe comparison.

１． Definitions
Post-communist has been used to denote the period after 1989 and the “transition to democracy”(Mink and Szurek 1993) in Central Europe and later in other former communist countries. Post-walland post-cold war are other terms that are commonly used to cover the period of the nineties in thatpart of the world. I will be focusing on migrations taking place in, from or to former eastern bloc
countries including the former Yugoslavia. Germany is the country of the European Union(hereafter EU) most concerned by these migrations and I will be referring often to it as well as to theGerman data to illustrate the trends. Russia is another country largely affected both internally andinternationally by massive “post-imperial” movements of Russians toward their former “mother land”
and abroad, but also by other migrants whose final destination is not necessarily Russia.
According to the most widely used definition, international migrants are persons who take up
residence in a foreign country (World Migration Report 2000). Thus defined, international migrants do
not include the variety of short term moves of tourists, business travellers, religious pilgrims, or
persons seeking medical treatment who make millions of visits to foreign countries each year.
Rather, only those foreigners who remain for an extended stay in a new country are counted asinternational migrants. However, migration processes actually cover a multitude of different
patterns and do not necessarily lead to settlement and integration in only one place. The concept ofinternational migration I am using here implies a one-way migration as well as repeated movements
across nation-state boundaries, for permanent or shorter or longer term stays (sojourns).

Gender refers to asymmetrical power relations. It is a universal ordering principle, which, alongwith and in spite of other differentiations (class, ethnicity) and diverse cultural expressions, assigns
more value to men’s characteristics, behaviour, and beliefs than to women’s. The result is atendency for men and masculinities to dominate. Gender power distribution structures every aspectof human interaction: who will be socialised to become vulnerable or strong, who will have property,

16

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２political power, take decisions in the family and in politics, who will be excluded from privileges, whowill be prone to mobility or denied the opportunity to move.

Europe refers to the continent re-united. The “iron curtain” no longer exists. However, any
definition or self-definition of Europe entails a basic East-West dichotomy.

“Europe” and “European”

are usually constructed as referring to things “Western”, in contrast or opposition to other regions orcultures, which are characterised as “Eastern” (Stolting
2000). According to some thesis in which¨
one can depict a kind of self fulfilling prophecy, Europe is also a theatre of the “clash of civilizations.”
The line between the “west and the rest”, which cuts Europe in two is geographically only slightly tothe east of the former iron curtain line (Huntington, 1996).
Map 1. Europe in 2001

Source: Homme et Migrations 2001, p. 7.

17

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

Map 2. The Iron Curtain

Source: Foucher 1993, p. 53.

And yet, it is impossible to draw a line between European East and West. For the French the East
begins in Germany, for Germany in Poland, and so on. Russians have also their own East: Central
Asia and the Chinese. The concept of East functions as a contrast to the West, with shifting
reference points within Europe.
This dichotomy is present in the minds of all Europeans and is very important for the construction
and recomposition of their identities, but also for the perpetuation of the myth of Europe as a nonimmigrant society (Kramer 1993). It also has implications for attitudes toward migrants: when theiron curtain was lifted, the Europeans (i.e. those who monopolised the name of the continent forthemselves only) feared “invasion from the East”, or from the “other Europe” (Morokvasic,
Angenendt and Fischer 1993: Withol de Wenden and de Tinguy 1995). It also has implications for18

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２

migration policies: the policies that serve as a reference point and as guidelines for the countries of
its Eastern part are those of Western Europe, of the EU (de Tinguy 2001).

２． The Global Trends

Map 3. Huntington’s Divide

In our globalized world the population of international migrants haslately been increasing at a faster rate than the rate of global population
increase──which was not the case some thirty years ago. Still only 2.6% of
the world’s population live outside their original country of origin: some 150
million people world-wide. This means that the propensity to moveinternationally, particularly in the absence of any violent pressure such as
wars, is limited to a small proportion of humans. Most people prefer not
to migrate if they feel that they can satisfy their needs at home. Those
who move also have a high propensity to return if they have somewhere to
return to.
The following are the principal trends that affect international migrationand global responses to it. Developments in Europe have to be seen in that
context.

Growing Economic Integration and Globalisation
Migration is one of the constitutive processes of globalisation today.
However the progressive globalisation of capital and many commodities has
not been matched by the globalisation of labour. Whereas goods and capital
move freely, people do not. The growing interconnectedness of the world

Source: Huntington 1996, p. 159.

also leads to more poverty, and increases the gap between rich and poor
countries. In poor countries, the decline of traditional economic sectors, subsequent unemployment
and foreign debt not only generate migration, but also force the governments of these countries torely on the migration of their citizens and their remittances. The pressure to emigrate is met byprotective walls on behalf of the powerful, rich states. Most workers remain firmly tied to theterritorial world of the state system, with border controls restricting their movement remaining astight as in the past and often tighter. Globalisation processes have precisely revitalised rather thandiminished one crucial function of the nation state, namely that of controlling the movement of people
across its borders (Nyberg-Soerensen 1998). Erecting walls around richer and therefore more andmore desirable economies feeds and encourages illegal trafficking in people.

Transnationalism
Transnational population movements may also be seen as part of the globalising tendencies in themodern world. The phenomenon of “workers without frontiers” (Stalker 2000), trans-national

19

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

migrants or “transmigrants” (Glick-Schiller, Basch and Szanton-Blanc 1995; Faist 2000; Pries 1997;
Smith and Guarnizo 1998) is spreading worldwide in spite of (or along with) the growing state andinterstate efforts to control the movements and borders and halt unwanted migrations. For
migrants, at least those who are free to move, it is now much easier than before to live in twosocieties at the same time, maintaining two homes and commuting between them. Circulatory
migration is an important dimension of migration systems (Kritz, Lim and Zlotnik 1992) and this is
the case in many parts of the world (China-Canada, Eastern-Western Europe, North Africa-Europe,
Turkey-Europe etc). The flow of migrants’ remittances often exceeds revenue from tourism orother trade, investment or foreign aid to the source country and maintaining the flow of these
remittances is often an important consideration in migration policy making. Dual and multiple
citizenships are among the visible outcomes of transnational movements and transnational belonging.
Though slowly and reluctantly, this change in reality can also be followed by changes in legislation(as recently in Germany).

Technological Advance in Transport and Communication
Geographic distances count less and less: with ever cheaper and faster travel the likelihood of long
distance moves increases. But migration no longer means a separation from the families for long
periods of time nor a break with a past. Instant communication through the internet andinexpensive telephone services permits migrants to remain in touch with families at home. Theinternet may also facilitate job searching and access to labour. All this may facilitate migration or
increase opportunities for moving. On the other hand, instant communications also create job
opportunities locally, which in the long run may be a deterrent to migration. After moving
production offshore, many large Western companies have been turning to the South for alsodelocalising their customer services.

International Relations in the Post-Cold War Era and Refugee Regimes
The most profound effects on migration regimes are those relative to forced migration. Most
current refugee policy was formulated after World War II with the lessons of the Nazi era in mind
and the increase in East-West tensions. Refugee policy was seen as an instrument of foreign policy.
Admission of refugees for permanent re-settlement and asylum were all part of the fight against
communism. Ideological support for such a generous non-refoulement（i.e. not to reject entrants atthe border）policy is no longer there and non-entry has become the guiding principle of a new agenda
hostile to refugees (Joly, Kelly and Nettleton 1997). This implies a strategy of containment of
threatened populations in the areas of origin or in their vicinity. A new category of IDPs―
Internally displaced persons ── has been coined to designate them. “Humanitarian interventions”
may be carried out on their behalf. This highlights the growing inequity between those states
which retain control over their destinies and have the power to intervene in other states or wage
wars “in the name of human rights” and the weaker ones, whose state sovereignty is undermined,20ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２incapable of exercising any such controls.

Demographic Trends
Demographic trends affect international migration, they are an important factor in explaining
emigration pressures from many developing sending countries with rapid population growth(Chesnais 1995). In most of the states of the developed world, on the other hand, fertility rates are
below replacement rates, and the population is ageing, which may in the long run influence thereceptivity of these states towards migration. The projected change in migration policy in Germany
may herald broader changes in that direction.2
Related to this are the changing role of women in the society: women’s education and their ability
to generate income are essential in any strategy to restrain rapid population growth. As they gain
more autonomy through education and work, they migrate not only as reuniting spouses but also as
the main protagonists of migration and principal applicants for work visas. Women are also
important actors in what Saskia Sassen has called “alternative circuits of survival” (Sassen 2000).

Toward a Global Management of Migration
A number of regional and international mechanisms have developed in the past decades to deal
with new realities of migration. Europe had the lead in establishing free circulation within theEuropean community in 1968, the intergovernmental Shengen agreement was signed in 1985 andother regional consultation processes have been co-ordinated by the International Organisation for
Migration (IOM) or United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). This is a new
development: states traditionally tend to see immigration policy as a matter of national interest andsovereignty. In the “Guest-worker period” of the 1960’s and the 1970’s the European states used toadopt unilateral policies or make bilateral agreements with the sending states. So far, theharmonisation of migration policies mainly relates to managing unauthorised migration and to bordercontrols. This has not stopped migrants, but has redirected their moves, changed the migration
patterns and contributed to the mushrooming of professional trafficking.
Even when the authority in this area shifts to regional or international institutions or regimes,
these continue to exercise authority usually on behalf of the most powerful states. Although there ismuch talk about global migration and about trends toward the global migration regime, there is no
emerging global governance of international migration and there is so far little global humane
governance in sight. Compared to their efforts in the areas of global trade and investment, states
have done comparatively little to try to renew or strengthen the international human rights regime(Collinson 1999). The international refugee regime and right to asylum, human rights and minority
rights are meanwhile under serious threat, in particular since the attack on the symbols of US
imperialism on 11 September. As the case of the Afghan boat people heading to Australia in
September 2001 has demonstrated, it is increasingly left to the judiciary and to non governmentalorganisations (and sometimes to intergovernmental organisations) to invoke international human21

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨rights instruments to protect migrants and refugees ── usually in opposition to the governments
concerned.3

Trafficking in People
Trafficking implies the transportation of people across borders in an illicit way (it seeks tocircumvent cross-border traffic regulation). It often involves also a forced recruitment for work andservices and a use of violent means to do so. The new trend is the scale of people smuggling: it isestimated that some four million people are being trafficked in the world every year. Another trend
is its increased professionalisation and more and more involvement of transnational crime networks
in controlling the undocumented migration. This has an impact on the profile of smuggled people
and the conditions under which they are transported ── with minimum protection and safety,4 aswell as on their lives upon arrival in a destination where they are forced into prostitution or kept in
virtual slavery in order to repay “debts” or are sold to businesses who cover the fees in exchange forindentured labour. Trafficking in women is mainly related to the sex labor and prostitution. It is
an increasingly lucrative business ── it is estimated that these human trafficking operations yieldprofits of about US$ 7 billion per year.

22ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２

３． The New European Migration LandscapeMap 4. Migrations in Europe since 1989

Source: Foucher 1993, p. 289.

An Overview
Most of these global trends apply also in the context of the Europe-Europe migrations. The
demographic situation is however different from most of other geopolitical areas, where migratory
movements are generated by the concentration of deep contrasts: on the one hand, economic
abundance, political stability, social security and welfare and low birth rates in close connection with23

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

economic poverty, political unrest and demographic explosion, on the other. Birth rates of the most
European populations, East and West, are low and there is no demographic pressure from the poorer
East.
As for gender roles, the Eastern European women had broad access to education and to the labour
market in the period of socialism (Kosmarskaya 1999; Einhorn 1993). Therefore, their propensity to
migrate, which is very high, is rather associated with their experience of a loss of previously held
benefits and rights acquired under socialism, than with the recently changing roles enabling them togain more independence.
The EU countries now have a foreign population of some 18 million. As part of the total
population it varies from less than 2% in Finland or Italy to over 30% in Luxembourg, 8. 9% in
Germany, and 6. 3% in France.
Table 1. 1990 census data
Country1

Foreign

Percentage of

population

total population

Germany
France１
Great Britain
Italy
Belgium
Austria
Netherlands
Spain
SwedenGreeceDenmark
Portugal
Luxembourg
IrelandFinland7314. 03596. 6
1972. 01095. 6911. 9728. 2679. 9539. 0526. 6304. 0237. 7172. 9142. 8118. 0
73. 8

Total

18413. 0

8. 9
6. 3
3. 4
2. 0
9. 0
9. 0
4. 4
1. 3
6. 0
3. 0
4. 7
1. 7
34. 1
3. 2
1. 4

１
９
９
０census data

Source: OECD, SOPEMI Reports, Eurostat

Germany is the primary target of East and Central European immigrants, migrants, refugees andundocumented residents. There are ten times more migrants from that part of Europe in Germany
than in France, the second largest immigration receiving country in Europe.
The re-composition of the European migration landscape after 1989 concerns both the European
South and its Central and Eastern part. This paper focuses on the latter, but I would like first to
stress some similarities, in particular since the European South has become also a target of somemigrations from the East. Both are originally sending areas and have turned within a very shorttime into transit and receiving areas with little previous experience and legislation in dealing withimmigrants. Both have a large proportion of women migrants especially in more recent movements(Oso 1998; Campani 1993). This is a new “gender-even” or sometimes even female dominated24

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２pattern, away from the male dominated guest-worker pattern characteristic of Europe in the 1970’s.
In the Central and Eastern part of Europe the previously international migrations turned into
internal ones (in case of Germany for instance), those that used to be domestic, internal movements
became international (with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia into
twenty two new states); the areas of origin, of destination and transit are interwoven; and borderregions become centres of activity for some people and insurmountable obstacles for the mobility ofothers.
Transnational migrations from and to Eastern Europe are signs of the progressive incorporation ofthat region into the world system and more specifically into the enlarged European Union. They
are likely to continue but will predominantly involve temporary moves of persons involved in shortterm income generating activities. These persons do not move with their families and as far associal security, welfare provisions and education are concerned they draw on and depend on theirhome countries, not the host countries (Morawska 2000). This is an important difference to themigrations of the guest-worker period.
One can trace these migrations back to four moments that have earmarked these profoundchanges: the fall of the Berlin Wall, the German Unification, the violent disintegration of Yugoslavia
and the implosion of the Soviet Union. These events triggered or accelerated already existing¨” (themovements of Germans from the GDR (German Democratic Republic) of so-scalled “Ubersiedler
Germans who had settled “across” in East Germany) and the so-called “Aussiedler ” from thecommunist world (mainly USSR, Poland and Romania). Millions of shopping and working tourists areengaged in transborder movements not to go sightseeing but to engage in a variety of income
generating activities (Wallace 1997; Morokvasic 1999; Cyrus 1997; Irek 1998). Finally, the nationalist
projects and hostility towards minorities, including wars, displaced millions of former Yugoslavs,
Russians and other groups towards the territories where their groups were in a majority.
In the 1970s and the 1980s, departures from the countries belonging to the Soviet block wererelatively rare in proportion to the total population of almost 400 million in that area. On the
average, Western Europe received only about 100,000 persons per year from that area (Chesnais1995). For Eastern Europeans at that time, emigration was equivalent to exile for good. Theirdepartures accelerated, however, at the end of the 1980’s. In the months preceding 9 November
1989, the citizens of the GDR “voted with their feet”: they used their opportunity to travel to theneighbouring socialist countries, “occupied” Western Embassies. Czechoslovakia and Hungary letthem pass to Austria.
Even before the fall of the Berlin Wall the Poles, benefiting from the lenient exit regulation of theircountry, used to come massively to Germany for seasonal work or as street sellers. In the south,
Albanians loaded old ships and landed in Italy ── the “Albanian boat people ” was the expression
immediately coined. The images of overloaded trains and boats were exploited by the media
fuelling panic about invasion of prosperous Europe by poor East Europeans. It was feared thatmillions of Russians would leave the country as soon as they received their passports. A number of25

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

opinion surveys on “potential migrants” from the East fuelled the panic, providing a scientificjustification to irrational fears of invasion.
Fears in the West did not materialise. Although an unprecedented number of people was set on
the move (the estimates are about 25 million annual border crossings just for the countries of Central
Europe), it did not result in a massive exodus. About two million persons from the East wereadmitted in 1989 and 1990 and as many in the next two years. The main beneficiary was Germany
and to an extent Austria. Other Western European countries were not important targets. And
although Germany still does not consider itself as an immigration country,5 No other European
society has been as confronted with migration as Germany (Bade and Munz
¨ 2000). In the years
following the Second World War Germany received millions of displaced and deported Germans fromthe Eastern Reich Territories. By 1949 when the Federal Republic was founded, they were over 8
million or 16% of its population. Over 30 million people (foreigners, ethnic Germans, asylum seekers,families) came to Germany from 1950 to 1998 and in the same period some 22 million left the country.
Besides, almost seven million came from the GDR to the West, whereas a million and a half migrated
in opposite direction. (Bade and Munz
¨ 2000).
Graph 1.

Source: Statistisches Bundesamt

The high percentage of women is an aspect which is characteristic of most post-communist
movements. The most important legacy of state socialism was the institutionalised equality between
women and men and a number of rights along with it, as well as paid employment as a norm for
women: a majority of women of working age were economically active.
However the commitment to equality took place in societies which have preserved strong
patriarchal norms and corresponding gender power relationships. Many women did not see theright to work as liberation. Rather, the right to work was degraded by state compulsion into an
obligation to be endured (Einhorn 1993). It subjected them to the rigors of the double burden.
They were the first to lose their jobs in the process of post-communist economic restructuring

26

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２(Heinen 1995, Rai Pilkington and Phizacklea 1992; Funk and Mueller 1993). However, they did notsee in that loss something worth defending locally or possible to defend locally.
Thus they became a large supply of would-be migrants, readily available to respond to the demandin destination countries. Given the nature of job supply for migrant women (mainly in services), theirregular character of both their entry and of their subsequent income generating activity remains
much more easily concealed than that of migrant men.
I will look at four main migration trends in the diversified pattern of migrations in Europe
nowadays, highlighting some of their gender dimensions:
1. permanent migration (ethnic and family migration),
2. transnational work migration (official recruitments, circular/shuttle “tourist” migrations for the
purpose of work and trade)
3. forced migration and refugee movements
4. undocumented migration and trafficking
These migration flows are often overlapping; the boundaries between formal and informal,
between legal and illegal, between forced and voluntary being often blurred. For example: migrants
can come as tourists ── which is perfectly legal within the time limits of their visa or visa-freetravel, but if they engage in an income generating activity and if they overstay their visa period,
they

becomeillegal. In

somecountries

thelegalisation

procedures

have

enabledsome

undocumented migrants to legalise their situation as in France, Italy, Greece, Portugal or Spain. In
some countries and at some periods of labour market conjuncture, asylum seekers may have accessto the labour market. Otherwise they are not allowed to work, but are kept in the conditions which
discourage them from staying in the country: in detention centres, with restricted mobility, andunder prohibition of bringing families, or family reunion left to the discretion of the authorities in thereceiving countries.

３‐
１．Permanent Migrations
The enlargement of the European Union by twelve new members, with a further four countries
joining in a few years, raises the question of the free circulation of persons. What will happen when
the citizens of new member states are free to circulate, take jobs and settle wherever they wish
throughout the Union? Will the poorer East “flood” the rich West? Such a perspective may bequestioned for several reasons. Similar questions were asked when former sending countries of theSouth, (Greece, Spain and Portugal) joined the Union. The experience of the EU countries so far
shows that intra European mobility has not increased but has diminished: only five million of some
300 million EU citizens have chosen to live in an EU country other than their own. Besides, neither
Poland, though a traditionally emigration country, nor the Czech Republic nor Hungary became
sending areas. Their citizens show little propensity to emigrate permanently, or ── as far as
Czechs and Hungarians are concerned ── even to undertake short term moves. On the contrary,27

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨these states of Central Europe are now receiving more foreigners both from the South and from theEast than they are sending to the West (Jazwinska and Okolski 1996). Permanent emigration is also
diminishing from other countries hoping to join the EU, Bulgaria and Roumania. But the propensityof their citizens to circulate remains high. They were the last to acquire the right to visa-free travelto the EU.
Most permanent migrations are ethnic in character and are politically treated as “repatriations” inthe countries of destination: ethnic Germans or Jews from the former Soviet Union mostly headingfor Germany (as well as Israel and the US for those of Jewish background), Russians from the former
Soviet republics to Russia. As in permanent migrations usually, the sex ratio is even or women
outnumber men slightly.
Up to 1987 a million and a half ethnic Germans (Aussiedler) came to Germany, mostly from Poland
but also from Rumania and the Soviet Union. During the next ten years 2.5 million arrived, amajority from the former Soviet Union (see Graph 2).

Graph 2.

Source: Statistisches Bundesamt

Aussiedler benefited from preferential treatment and a number of integration measures which otherimmigrants did not have (paid language classes, professional re-training, housing allowances, etc.).
But this preferential treatment was not gender-neutral: men and women enter gender-segregatedlabour markets with often inadequate qualifications. The re-training measures for instance, with
their focus on skilled production work, have benefited men more than women who entered theservice sector. Thus, as Quack has demonstrated (1993), three years after their arrival to Germany,
men usually succeeded in finding jobs, though below their skill level, whereas women remained
unemployed. This in turn had an impact on families because of the uneven integration of family
members into German society, women remaining more isolated.
Russia has received almost seven million persons from the former non Russian Soviet Republics inthe period from 1989 to 1996. Politically, they are regarded both as repatriations and as forced

28

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２

migrations (Vishnevski 1996; Kosmarskaya 1999). The pattern of migration is family based and themove to Russia represents a loss of social status for both men and women. “Families” often
however consist of single mothers and single, retired women who suffer discrimination in the processof resettlement (Kosmarskaya 1999). Thus, those who still remain in the former republics (it isestimated that there are some thirty million Russians and Russian speakers left in the Newly
Independent States) have been slowly adapting to their new position of minorities. Further
migration is discouraged by the negative experience of the former migrants.
The enlargement of Europe, the moving of Shengen6 borders to the East and the introduction ofvisas by the new EU members and member-candidates for their Eastern neighbour citizens, maytransform much of what is now shuttle migration from Ukraine, Byelorussia, and Moldova to Central
Europe into a permanent one. It may also be diverted towards Russia.

Family reunification

is another world-wide form of permanent migration. It is often aconsequence of labour migration: those already in the country bring their families or marry in theircountry of origin and bring their fiances´ and spouses. Depending on the country and on thedefinition of “family” it can be a cause of still further migration. The situation in Europe ── itvaries from group to group and from country to country ── is however different from that in theUS, where family members can and do sponsor other family members.
Family reunification is supported by international human rights law (Article 16. 3 of the Universal
Declaration of Human rights says that the family is “the natural unit of the society and entitled toprotection by the society and the state”). In Europe, family is not only protected as the basic unit ofsociety, it is also generally acknowledged that the family is changing: traditional family structures
are breaking down, and new forms of marriages and partnerships are emerging. However, statesusually have double standards when it comes to defining the families of their own citizens and thoseof migrants (Lutz 1997). There are no obligations on behalf of EU members towards the third
country nationals. When it comes to family reunification of a migrant, it is not granted
automatically, but is left to the discretion of member states. The eligibility to bring family is
restricted for many migrant groups (such as asylum seekers and short term workers). Besides,
potential beneficiaries of family reunification are forced into the most traditional family arrangements
and ever-stricter adherence to family structures in order to be permitted entry. For instance, forced
to live apart for periods stretching from one to three years, they are supposed to prove the stabilityof their marriage! The probation period continues even after their entry. The independent
resident status is not granted to the spouse if the marriage breaks before that probation period.
Although the requirements to entry for the purpose of family reunification are formally genderneutral, the wives and husbands and male and female fiances´ have not been treated equally becauseof the prevailing gendered stereotypes about supposedly culturally determined sex roles. The
restrictions based on the “male breadwinner” stereotype have long prevented women from bringing
their family or their husbands. Those restrictions have been lifted but there is still a prevailingsuspicion that men use marriages of convenience to enter the country for the purpose of work.

29

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

Women, on the contrary, find it much easier to enter on a spouse visa．

３‐
２．Transnational Work Migration
３‐
２‐
１．The Decline of official recruitments
Whereas in the guest-worker period of the 1960s and 1970s migratory movements in Europe took
place within the framework of official recruitment policies and migrants were brought to fill in thevacancies in manufacturing industries, since the 1980s, migrations are taking place in the context ofclosed borders, the increasing disintegration of protected labour markets and the casualisation ofwork. This creates a demand for foreign workers willing to accept “informal wages” onconstruction sites, in household renovation, agriculture, cleaning, repair and other services. Thoughcases of official new recruitment do exist in Germany in particular, they are still on a more limited
scale than those thirty years ago. Most involve contract labour, mostly from Central Europe, inparticularfrom

Poland,

and

some

other

ex-communist

Central-European

countries.

Such

recruitment takes place as “an exception to the non-recruitment” policy adopted in 1974: 312,977
workers were recruited in 1999 and almost 350,000 in 2000. Such official recruitment concerns
primarily men.
The educational and skill level of Central Eastern European migrants is high and their origin is
predominantly urban: over half of those of Jewish background who left Russia for Israel or Germany
had a university degree. Among the flows in Europe different survey data suggest a percentage ofacademics ranging from 13 to 23% (Morokvasic 1996). From 1990 to 1993 top German scientificinstitutions received 1257 scientists from Russia, Poland, and Bulgaria. A majority of them (some80%) were men, reflecting the gendered demand and an uneven gender distribution in science inGermany, rather than an imbalance in the sending countries (Rudolph 1994a), where women used tobe comparatively more present in scientific jobs.
The scientists and highly skilled migrants who get a job close to the level of their qualification area minority. Given the nature of the job supply one can speak of a de-skilling process, in particular in
the case of women, only a minority in official programs, who often take jobs as domestic helpers or
caretakers. But these jobs tend to be on a semi-regular basis and will be discussed in the lastsection.
A study of Czech transborder workers in Bavaria showed that a majority (two thirds) of therecruited were men. For both men and women, the work done was under their qualification level
and less skilled than the work they had done in their country. Again, women were worse off:
whereas all men had skilled jobs, only one third of women did (Rudolph 1994b).
The employment data for Germany, however, show that the profile of East Europeans in Germanyhas deteriorated in twenty years. It seems also that the drop in the labour market position reflects
to an extent the lower educational level of migrants now as compared to those twenty years ago.

30

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２Graph 3. Position in Labour Market, Germans andEast Europeans (women), 1980 and 1999

Graph 4. Position
intheLabourMarket,German and East European (men), 1980 and 1999

80

60
East
Europeans
Germans

70
60

40
［％］

50
［％］

East Europeans
Germans

50

40
30

30
20

20
10

10
0

1980

1999

1980

Unskilled

1999

Skilled

1980

1999

Graph 5. Educational level of Germans and East
Europeans (men), 1980 and 1999

1980

1999

1980

Skilled

1999

White collar

Graph 6. Educational Level of Germans and East
Europeans(women),1980 and 199970

East Europeans
Germans

60

40

40

［％］

50

30
20

East
Europeans
Germans

60

50

30
20

10
0

1999

Unskilled

70

［％］

1980

0

White collar

101980 1999

1980 1999

1980 1999

1980 1999

Without

Primary

Professional
schoolingHigh school01980 1999

1980 1999

1980 1999

1980 1999

Without

Primary

Professional
schoolingHigh school

Source: Elaborated by me on the basis of German employment statistics, data presented in Bade and Munz 2000, p. 67, p. 69.

There is still a high proportion of Eastern Europeans with University education (among men evenproportionally more than among German men).
As early as twenty years ago, about two thirds of German women were in white-collar jobs
(employees), in 1999 76% had these jobs. As for the East European women the trend is reversed:
the proportion of those in white-collar jobs diminishes and those in blue-collar jobs increases (Graph
3). One can observe a similar tendency among men: German men, much less in “employee jobs”
than German women in 1980, tend to leave skilled blue-collar jobs for white-collar jobs. The
percentage of those in unskilled jobs remains the same. As for East European men, who used to be
proportionally better represented in white collar jobs than their German counterparts (over 30%),
their profile deteriorated, with over 50% in unskilled jobs and less than 20% in white collar jobs.
In the same period the educational profile of German men and women has improved, whereas thatof East Europeans has deteriorated: the number of those without any schooling has increased forboth German and East European men. Fewer East Europeans now have professional training or
higher education compared with twenty years ago. But twenty years ago, the percentage of those31

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

with higher education was twenty times higher than among the Germans and today it is just slightly
higher. As for the East European women, the majority used to have either professional schooling or
higher education. Today, the proportion of both has decreased and those without education or withprimary education has increased.
３‐２‐
２． Circulation, Work and “Trade Tourists”
The most important feature in the new migrations from and in the Eastern Europe is not thatpeople become “free to leave” but rather “free to leave and to come back” (Morokvasic 1996a; 1999) .
What used to be exodus (emigration for good) in the time of the cold war, could now become a backand forth movement, as it historically used to be. Departure no longer implies leaving forever anddoes not, as before, exclude return. These movements, variably called commuter, shuttle, pendulum,
colniki remind of historical figures of commuting migrants called golondrinas (Moch 1996) andcolporteurs (Fontane 1993), or Preußengänger (Bade 1982), increased tremendously in the post 1989
period.
They involve traders, seasonal labourers in agriculture and in construction, domestic helpers andworkers in nursing and care who usually within their short visa-free period travel as tourists andengage in these different activities. Their circulation is facilitated not only by liberalised exit
legislation, but also by the relaxed visa requirements for the citizens of the states who are candidates
for joining the EU (visa requirements were first lifted for Poles as early as April 1991 and last for
Rumanians on January 1st 2002).
Most mobile of all have been the Polish. Already in 1990 22 million Poles travelled abroad, which
was 15 times more than a decade earlier (when travel “abroad” implied mainly to communist
countries). This short term mobility, or, as some researchers called it “quasi migration” or“incomplete migration,” is a result of economic restructuring which has left masses of people without
jobs. It cuts across all social strata: the people on the move are well-educated, often with university
degrees; they take off for a short time to harvest grapes, strawberries or asparagus in Germany inorder to supplement wages, preserve their standard of living at home or improve it. Paradoxicallytherefore, they migrate in order to stay at home (Morokvasic 1999). Their mobility is mainly analternative to emigration. They respond to a persistent demand for cheap labour in a number ofsectors, mostly in Germany where various measures to get the local unemployed to do the work
remained unsuccessful.

32ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (1)Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (2)Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (4)Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (3)Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨
Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

Circulatory migration for the purpose of work and trading is a widespread form of migration
throughout the Eastern part of the European continent and in Central Europe. Officially tourists,these post-communist migrants commute on a daily, weekly or monthly basis (Morokvasic 1992;

33

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (6)Photo. Polish Market in Berlin 1991-92 (5)Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller¨

Wallace 1997). The fact that migration can be envisaged as a short-term move only, whatever the
final outcome, increases the propensity to move, but also the likelihood of return and circulation.
The scope of this migration is difficult to estimate, as migrants usually move several times a year.
Empirical evidence suggests that women are more likely than men to engage in this kind of shortdistance movement because of the division of labour in the household and women’s mothering role
(Morokvasic 1999). Migrant women create a transnational migratory space in which they try to
optimise the opportunities and minimize the obstacles relative to their reproductive and productive
work. Polish women have themselves set up a system of rotation so that they can go home atregular intervals, while their female substitute takes up their cleaning or other jobs in Germany inthe meantime. They are usually a group of 4−5 sharing both employers and housing. This
reduces costs incurred by double residence. The regularity of their commuting seems to be
determined by their care for the family remaining in Poland. In the case of the males whom I
interviewed, working mainly in construction or in agriculture, commuting takes place at less regularintervals and is determined by the seasonal nature of their jobs and by the needs of the employer.
Women engaged in “self−managed” rotation also avoid being captured in an institutionalised formof dependency: not only they are not dependent on one employer, but their employers become
dependent on their “self−managed” rotation system. Besides, their constant mobility enables them34

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２

to avoid illegal status.
Many of the East European “live-out” cleaners, baby sitters and care takers to whom the German
middle-class, career-oriented women transfer the reproductive work that they would have donethemselves, are themselves also middle class, academics or professionals in their own countries andare trying often to hold on to these jobs. Whereas the former engage in career-building, using theirclass and citizenship privilege to buy themselves out of performing reproductive tasks, employing
other women to perform these tasks, the latter are de-classed (Friese 1995). Thus, the increasing
equal opportunities between German men and women in the outside world are overlapping withincreasing inequalities among women: German on the one hand and Polish, Russian, Filipino etc. on
the other. As for the gendered division of labour in the household, the presence of foreign female
substitutes enables the status quo to be preserved.

３‐
３．Forced Migration and Refugees

Graph 7. Asylum Seekers in Germany Per Year

Source: Bade and Munz 2000, p. 21.

Whereas the central European countries were able to negotiate the lifting of visa requirements fortheir citizens in exchange for being gatekeepers of EU borders (the border guards who were used toprevent their own citizens from emigrating, are now asked to prevent third country citizens fromgetting in) the post-communist period did not bring freedom of mobility to everybody.
The disintegration of Yugoslavia and of the USSR and the creation of new ethnically-defined nation
states created flows of refugees in a long and violent process of unmixing (“unscramble” in H.
Arendt‘s words) of populations. Whereas most of these movements were contained within the
territories of the former two multinational states, creating voluminous ethnic resettlements, the “spillover” into western Europe occurred only in the case of those from the former Yugoslavia. But thistook place before the post Yugoslav states were created and before the new visa regulations were
imposed on their citizens (1992).

35

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

Graph 8. Entry and Exit of Yugoslavs into Germany Per Year

Source: Bade and Munz
¨ 2000, p. 34.

Yugoslavs had strong connections in Western European countries as former guest workers orfamilies of guest workers and as holders of Yugoslav passports they did not need visas for travelling
into Western Europe. However, immediately after the recognition of the new states in 1992, visas
were imposed by the EU, and gradually other European countries, on their citizens, except
Slovenians and with some privileges given to Croatians by Germany.
European authorities also implemented in 1993 a new regime for these refugees, that of“temporary protection.” The new legislation created a new category of people to whom the Geneva
Convention would not apply. They were “tolerated temporarily” but did not have social rights,
rights to family reunion or access to the labour market and were often restricted in their territorial
movements. Germany received by far the highest number of refugees. Most were sent back to theircountries of origin when the hostilities were over or the situation was considered to be “normal.”
It is generally acknowledged that women form a majority of the world’s refugees, some 80%(Gottstein 1995). However, they constitute a minority among the asylum seekers in the countries ofdestination. Why is it so?
The process of claiming refugee status is formally gender-neutral, but this means that the law does
not respond specifically to women’s experiences. At its root is the ideology which makes a sharp
distinction between public and private spheres with women’s roles viewed as being primarily within
the private, domestic sphere. Politics is seen as public and therefore predominantly masculine.
Women are rarely seen as political actors in their own right and therefore rarely as potential
conventional refugees. Because of this lesser likelihood, the families and groups back home are alsoless likely to sponsor the emigration of a woman than that of a man.
Women arriving with their husbands are generally classified as dependants. There is evidence36ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２from surveys in different European countries that this reinforces the existing power relations in the
couple or family and facilitates the perpetuation of these power relationships in the country ofdestination. Women may be reluctant to report domestic violence for fear of jeopardising thefamily’s asylum application.
According to the Geneva Convention of 1951 it is a persecution or fear of persecution on the
grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion thatcan be a legitimate motive for granting political asylum.
The recommendation of the European Parliament of 13 April 1984 to the executive committee ofthe UNHCR to include women victims of specific persecution and inhuman treatment was left toeach state to apply or not.
This means that persecution on grounds of sex is not included and to gain refugee status womenmust claim that they have suffered rape, sexual assault or some other violation, as a result ofmembership of one of the categories listed in the Convention. That is why some have argued infavour of having women classified as a “social group” for asylum purposes. This would however be
problematic because it could lead to further exclusion and discrimination of women.
Perhaps more than ever before, the wars in former Yugoslavia have brought to the forefront theissue of violence related to warfare and concerning women: rape and forced prostitution. Before themedia seized the issue, the cases were simply rejected, “rape and fear of war not being sufficientreasons for granting political asylum, rape being a normal criminal act and not a politically motivatedone” (Tageszeitung (Berlin), 9 December 1992).

After that, from 1993 in particular, the world wide

debate focused on rape, but not so much as violence against women per se, but on ethnic rape, i. e.
acts of violence against women of a particular ethnic group and as an instrument of war. It wasstrong on the agenda when it was instrumental in looking for justification for a military intervention.
It is on those grounds that the International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague came up in
February 2001 with a historical and, from a feminist point of view, still very controversial judgement(Mishkowski 2001).7

Indeed, the wall of silence around sexualized violence in wars has been broken

and the convictions in the Hague are an important signal and empower women who accepted towitness for the first time in history, only a short time after the facts. However, a hierarchy ofsexualized violence is established and it seems that the rape becomes of political concern only when
it is not only a crime against women but also a crime against the group to which the woman isassumed to belong. Other “non strategic” violence against women becomes less terrible and normal,
banalized. The gender specific dimenison of rape, the underlying power hierarchies, the continuityof violence in peace and in war remain invisible. However, sexualized violence should be prosecutedalways, whereever it takes place and whoever the perpetrators (the US and NATO included) and not
only when it can be used for other political purpose (“humanitarian intervention” as in Bosnia).

37

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

３‐
４．Undocumented Migrants and Trafficking :There is more and more trafficking with reliance on professional smugglers or traffickers. Suchmigration is estimated today to represent 30% of the flows of the third country nationals towards the
EU. It has doubled in one decade in spite of the more and more restrictive measures to prevent it.
Some 150,000 people are apprehended every year on the EU borders and the authorities in charge ofdevising policies of prevention estimate that this is just one quarter of the total “illegal migration”.
This has been a constant trend in the post-war migrations world wide and suggests that the richcountries remain and will remain accessible whatever measures are taken to curtail migrations(Sassen 1996). Europe more and more resembles a fortress narrowing its gates of entry and people
are looking for alternative ways to pass, modifying their migration strategies with the aim toundermine the impact of these new restrictions.

Map 5. Main Routes of Undocumented Migration in Europe

Source: Liberation, 7 March, 2001.

38

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２

The increased participation of women in particular in some migratory flows does not necessarilyreflect more freedom of movement for them. Rather, as in the case of trafficked women, theirmobility may be totally restricted.
Women are smuggled into a fast growing sector employing almost exclusively women world wide:
the entertainment industry and sex labour. This is often related to various forms of trafficking in
women. The traffic in women and girls for the purpose of prostitution may be seen as one aspect ofa transnational transfer of sex-affective labour from low income areas to high income areas, to fillgaps which cannot be filled by indigenous labour (Truong 1996).
It is a growing business for traffickers who understand that it is more profitable to deal in humanbeings than in drugs, arms or cigarettes, because it provides an opportunity for a long term extortionof money under pressure and is not an “one time affair” only as with other commodities.
Trafficking into prostitution and into various forms of sex related entertainment relies sometimes on
the system of “mail order brides” and arranged marriages through the internet to reach customers
and for advertising (Vartti 2002 forthcoming).
While women from South East Asia and Africa have been trafficked into Europe for a long time,
women from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union are now the majority in this lucrativetrade. In Central and Eastern European countries, proximity has lowered the costs of transport andmade it easier and more profitable to traffic women from there.
The context in which women and girls are becoming more and more vulnerable to violence andexploitation has developed an internal dynamic and will be difficult to change. They come fromfragile economies where structural reforms have adverse effects on their livelihood. Economic andsocial inequalities and limited opportunities for work in the former communist countries makewomen easy targets for professionally organised networks that recruit them and assist them in theiremigration. Attracted by promises of “decent” and well-paid work through advertising of jobs that
do not exist, or kidnapped and sold by their male relatives or boyfriends, these women are trapped in
prostitution.

39

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

Map 6. Angela’s Odyssey

Source: Los Angeles Times , 3 September, 2001.

At the same time as being an important source for capital accumulation for various smugglers andtheir networks, this has become a survival strategy for many households (in Albania, and Moldova,
for instance). Besides, trafficking in women for the purpose of prostitution is related to different
forms of male mobility: tourism, the mobility of executives (which is also a source of hard currency
for the countries), but also to the military and to militarised peace-keeping. This male mobility
creates a demand for sexual labour. Sex tourism is not as developed as in Thailand or thePhilippines, but Russian girls are available to entertain Chinese or other businessmen on their trips to
Russia, women from the Ukraine, Byelorussia, Bulgaria, Rumania are smuggled in/and through theBalkans where the large presence of military peace keeping forces creates a permanent demand forsex workers.
“Guestimates” of the number of prostitutes in Germany vary from 200,000 to 400,000 and a quarterare said to originate from Eastern Europe. In the Czech Republic 70% of the prostitutes come fromthe poorer ex-communist countries. German sex tourists now just have to cross the border insteadof going as far as Thailand. Along the border between Germany and Czech Republic there is aseveral miles long strip of brothels where hundreds of ever younger and younger girls from Bulgaria,
Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova cater for the needs of clients. According to the estimations of thejoint EU police force this is a business equivalent to several billion dollars a year.8
Trafficked women are coerced into a totally dependent status vis-à-vis the trafficker who takes

40

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２their passports and their return tickets. Women are rotated across the European borders toprevent them from establishing long term connections with the outside world and keeping themwithin the three-month visa limit corresponding to status as a visitor or tourist. This artificial
legality is possible often thanks to a complicity between modern slave traders and the border policeof different countries involved in the trafficking route.
Women are usually indebted in their home country in order to pay the trafficker. They also haveto pay the “pimp” and for their food and rent, they can keep only a small percentage of what theyearn. If they try to leave the relationship or the job, they may be deported as illegal aliens. Most
West European governments expel illegally trafficked prostitutes.
There has recently been a significant change in the approach to trafficked women and girls by the
local police authorities in some European countries. Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands are taking
measures to protect women who were trafficked into prostitution. Rather than being simply treatedas illegal and sent back, they are offered shelter, a residence permit, the possibility to have a new
identity, and to bring their family. It is expected in return that they will provide information on
traffickers and their networks (Times 3, Sept 2001).

４．Reflecting on some issues for a comparative Asia-Europe agenda
Instead of a conclusion, I would like to raise some of the questions of interest for a possible
comparison with Japan or other Asian receiving countries.
The migration context is similar: both are large geopolitical areas where the concentration of deep
contrasts has generated and will generate migratory movements. Economic prosperity, politicalstability and low birth rates are geographically close to areas of economic poverty, political unrestand demographic explosion. In the receiving countries of both Asia and Europe the fertility rates
are very low, and the population is rapidly ageing. Who will support the elderly, and who will dothe unattractive jobs in future? To what extent is migration seen as a potential remedy to thesituation and what are the policies, if any, that reflect that awareness?
Feminisation of migration is a trend even more apparent in Asia than in Europe with sex ratiosthat in many cases have reversed from the originally male dominated ones, due to the characteristics
of labour demand. In female dominated migration the proportion of single women, at least in the
beginning of migration flows, is high. What are the implications for the processes of integration andsettlement in the two parts of the world, in particular knowing that family reunification is much
more restricted in Asia than in Europe? What models of citizenship and of integration are the dual
citizens or their offspring confronted with?
Transnational migration in its various forms is a phenomenon widespread in Asia and across the
Pacific as well as in Eastern and Western Europe. Often the very permanent status (permanent
residence, marriage with a national, acquisition of citizenship), enables these transnational travels andliving in two places. Migration has intensified in the post-communist period and in Europe migration

41

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

patterns have been diversified, in particular with intensified circulatory, short-term movements.
Transborder trading has dynamised economies in a number of Euro-regions.

How does it comparewith similar migration patterns in Asia (for instance in the Mainland China-Hong-Kong case or theRussia-China case)?
Trafficking and human smuggling, in particular of women for the entertainment industry, has been
a comparable phenomenon in Europe and Asia. The European Union states are moving toward
uniform legislation to combat human trafficking. So far the enforcement has been uneven. Somecountries are starting to have a new approach to the victims of trafficking, offering them security
and residence instead of expulsion. To what extent could that approach apply in Asia as well?
Labour recruitment has in European receiving (but officially non-immigration countries), consistedof a variety of “back-door” policies, exceptions, legalisations (amnesties) etc. How does this compare
to the Asian receiving countries and what are the prospects for more open recruitment strategies?
The “fortress Europe” has developed a hostile agenda toward refugees. It implies preventing
arrival in Europe, shifting the responsibility of assessment to other countries who have signed the
Geneva Convention (most have signed it), the more restrictive application of the Geneva Convention,and the denial of social assistance (access to the labour market, family reunion). This multiplicationof statuses, and difficult entry has eroded the image of the refugee, blurring the boundaries between
migrants, the undocumented and refugees. How does this compare to Asia where a number ofstates have not signed the 1951 Geneva Convention?

Notes
１．From Kurt Wolff The Sociology of Georg Simmel , (New York: The Free Press, 1950) p. 402.
２．The British Home secretary has recently declared that he was prepared to review the British asylum policy andthe work permit system “to take account of worldwide economic migration” Observer, 12. 9. 2001.
３．Lawyers of the Victorian Civil Liberties Council who were arguing in a Court in Melbourne in September 2001
that the 400 Afghan boat people rescued by a Norwegian ship were within the Australian jurisdiction and should be
brought ashore so that they can claim asylum, lost the case against the Australian government (Daily Yomiuri, 9.
September 2001).
４．The Union of Moroccans in Spain has recently estimated that some 4000 Moroccans have drowned in the past five
years trying to cross from Africa to Europe at Gibraltar in unsafe rubber dinghies.
５．This might however change: there is a new migration law proposal made public in July this year, Bericht der
Unabhäangigen Kommission Zuwanderung (Report of the Independent Commission on Migration) 2001.
６．The intergovernemental Shengen agreement signed on 14 July 1985 between France, Germany and the three
Benelux countries defines external borders of the «Shengen space» (space comprised by the states signatories of theagreement) while gradually suppressing the internal borders. Italy, Greece, Spain and Portugal joined in later.
The member states harmonize the external control of the borders, implemented a uniform visa for the citizens ofthird countries and cooperate on other issues relative to migration, circulation, asylum. The enlargment of Europe
eastwards implies the capacity of candidates to comply to the Shengen regime.
７．Three Bosnian Serbs were convicted to 28, 20 and 12 years of emprisonment for rape on “Muslim Bosnian
Women.”
８．Trafficking in Migrants, Quarterly Bulletin of IOM, Geneva, no. 19, 1999.

42

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２References
Bade,

Klaus

J.

and

RainerMunz.
¨

Migrationsreport 2000.

Fakten-Analysen-Perspektiven.

Frankfrut; NewYork:

Campus, 2000.
Bade, Klaus J. ed. Deutsche im Ausland -Fremde in Deutschland: Migration in Geschichte und Gegenwart.

Munchen:¨

Verlag C.H. Beck, 1992.
Bericht der Unabhangigen
Kommission Zuwanderung 2001.
¨

Zuwanderung Gestalten. Integration Fordern. Berlin: 2001.

Bohning,
Wolf-Rudiger. and Nana Oischi. “Is International Economic Migration Spreading?” International Migraiton¨
Review 29. 3 (1995): 79−7.
Campani, Giuseppe. “Labour Markets and Family Networks: Filipina Women in Italy.” In Rudolph Hedwig andMirjana Morokvasic-Muller. Bridging States and Markets. International Migrations of the Early Nineties. Berlin:
Sigma, 1993. p. 320. Reprint, Jean-Claude, Chesnais, Le crépuscule de l’Occident: dénatalite, condition des femmes etimmigration. Paris: Robert Laffont, 1995.
Collinson, Sara Globalisation and the Dynamics of International Migration: Implications for the Refugee Regime.
UNHCR Working paper 1−New Issues in Refugee Research. London, 1999.
Cyrus, Norbert. Zur Situation Irregulärer Polnischer Zuwanderinnen in Berlin. Report of the Berliner Fachkommission
Frauenhandel, 1997.
De Tinguy, Anne. “L’elargissment
a l’est de l’Union, un nouveau defi
Hommes et Migraions´｀´ pour l’Europe reunifiee.”´1230 (2001): 5−19.
Faist, Thomas. “Transnationalization in International Migration: Implications for the Study of Citizenship andCulture.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 23. 2 (March 2000): 189−222.
Fontaine, Laurence. Histoire du colportage en Europe.

Paris: Albin Michel, 1993.

Friese, Marianne. “Die Osteuropaische
Akademikerin, die im Westeuropaischen
Haushalt Dient: Neue soziale¨¨
Ungleichkeiten und Arbeitsteilungen zwischen Frauen.” In Konkurrenz und Kooperation.

Frauen im Zwiespalt?

Ilse Modelmog and Ulrike Grassel, eds. Munster: Lit Verlag, 1995. pp. 171−193.
¨
Funk, Nanette. and Magda Mueller, eds. Gender Politics and Post-Communism.
Gottstein, Margit. Folgen von Unterdruckung, Krieg und Flucht für Frauen.

New York: Routledge, 1993.

In: Senatsamt fur¨ die Gleichstellung (Hg):

Frauen auf der Flucht. Dokumentation der Fachtagung am 26. Oktober 1995 in Hamburg. Hamburg, pp. 8−16.
Heinen, Jaqueline. Chômage et devenir de la main-d’œuvre fèminine en Pologne: le coût de la transition. Paris:l’Harmattan, 1995.
Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Shuster, 1996.
IOM studies on trafficking in women. In particular: Omelaniuk Irene and Ginette Baerten “Trafficking in Womenfrom Central and Eastern Europe-Focus on Germany.” In Migration in Centralk and Eastern Europe, 1999 Review,
March 1999. Geneva/Vienna: IOM/ICMPD.
Irek, Malgorzata. Der Schmugglerzug. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch, 1998.
Jolly, Daniele,｀ Lynette Kelly and Clive Nettleton. Refugees in Europe: The Hostile New Agenda. London: Minority
Rights Group, 1997.
Kosmarskaya, Natalya. “Post-Soviet Russian Migration from the New Independent States: Experiences of Women
Migrants” In Doreen Indra, Engendering Forced Migration.

Theory and Practice. New York; Oxford: BerghahnBooks, 1999. pp. 177−199.
Kritz, Mary, Lim Lin Lean and Zlotnik Hania, eds. International Migration Systems: a Global Approach. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1992. p. 354.
Lutz, Helma “The Limits of Europeanness: Immigrant Women in Fortress Europe.” Feminist Review 57 (1997): 93−
111.
Mink George et Jean-Charles Szurek. Cet Etrange post-communisme, Paris: la Decouverte, 1993.

43

Mirjana Morokvasic-Muller
Post-Communist Migrations in Europe and Gender¨

Mischkowski Gaby “Ein Grauel ohne Strategie.” Tageszeitung (Berlin) 2 March 2001.
Morawska, Ewa Transnational Migrations in the Enlarged European Union: A Perspective from East Central Europe.
European University Institute, Florence, EUI Working Paper RSC, no. 2000/19.
Morokvasic, Mirjana. Steffen Angenendt and Andrea Fischer. “Migrations: est-ouest dans le debat
scientifique et´politique en France et en Allemagne.” Revue d’etudes comparatives est-ouest 3 (1994): 135−160.
. und Hedwig Rudolph. Wanderungsraum Europa: Menschen und Grenzen in Bewegung. Berlin: Sigma, 1994.
. et Hedwig Rudolph. Migrants: les nouvelles mobilites en Europe. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996.
. “La mobilite
elites scientifiques en provenance de l’Autre Europe: exode ou circulation.” Revue d’etudes´ des ´comparatives est-ouest 3 (septembre 1996a): 31−73.
. “Entre l’est et l’ouest., des migrations pendulaires.” In Mirjana Morokvasic and Hedwig Rudolph.
Migrants: les nouvelles mobilités en Europe. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996b. pp. 119−157.
. “La mobilite´ transnationale comme ressource: le cas des migrants de l’Europe de l’est.” Cultures et Conflits.
32 (1999): 105−122.
Nyberg-Soerensen, Ninna “Narrating Identity Across Dominican Worlds.” In Transnationalism from Below. MichaelPeter Smith and Luis Eduardo Guarnizo eds. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1998. pp. 241−269.
Oso, Laura “Women, the Pioneers of Migration Chains: the Case of Spain.” Working paper presented at the “Working
Party on Migration.” (DEELSA/ELSA/WP 2/(98)4), Paris, OCDE, 10−11 september 1998.
Page Moch, Leslie. “European Perspective. Changing Conditions and Multiples Migrations 1750−1940.” In European
Migrants: Global and Local Perspectives. Dirk Hoerder and Leslie Page Moch eds. Boston:Northeastern

University Press, 1996.
Pries, Ludger. ed. Transnationale Migration: Soziale Welt Sonderband 12. Baden-Baden .Nomos, 1997. p. 372.
Quack, S. “Zur beruflichen Eingliederung von Aussiedlerinnen und Aussiedlern in Deutschland.” In Mirjana
Morokvasic und Hedwig Rudolph. Wanderungsraum Europa: Menschen und Grenzen in Bewegung. Berlin: Sigma,
1994.
Rai, Shirin, Hilary. Pilkington and Annie Phizacklea, eds. Women in the Face of Change. London: Routledge, 1992.
Rudolph, Hedwig. “Grenzgangerinnen
und Grenzganger
aus Tschehien in Bayern.” In Mirjana Morokvasic und¨¨
Hedwig Rudolph. Wanderungsraum Europa: Menschen und Grenzen in Bewegung. Berlin: Sigma, 1994b.
Rudolph, Hedwig and Mirjana Morokvasic. Bridging States and Markets. International Migrations of the Early Nineties,
Berlin: Sigma, 1993. p. 320.
Rudolph, Hedwig. Ex Oriente Lux?

Discussion Paper F S I 94-105, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. 1994a.

Sassen, Saskia. Migranten, Siedler, Fluchtlinge. Von der Massenauswanderung zur Festung Europa.

Frankfurt: Fischer,

1996.
Schiller, Glick, Basch Linda Nina and Szanton-Blanc Cristina. From immigrant to Transmigrant:

Theorizing

Transnational Migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68. 1 (1995): 48−63.
Simmel, Georg. “The Stranger.” In The Sociology of Georg Simmel . H. K. Wolff ed. New York: The Free Press. 1950.
pp. 402−427.
Smith, Michael Peter and Luis Eduardo Guarnizo eds. Transnationalism from Below. New Brunswick: Transaction
Publishers, 1998.
Stalker, Peter. Workers without Frontiers: The Impact of Globalization on International Migration. Geneva: Lynne Rienner
Publishers, 2000: −ILO.
Stolting,
Erhard. “The East of Europe: A Historical Construction.” In Biographies and the Division of Europe. Breckner,¨
Roswitha, Deborah Fishman-Kalekin. and Ingrid Miethe. eds. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, 2000. pp. 23−38.
Tageszeitung (Berlin), 9 December 1992
Truong, Than-dam. “Gender, International Migration and Social Reproduction: Implications for Theory, Policy,
Research and Networking,” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 5. 1 (1996): 27−52.

44

ジェンダー研究 第５号 ２００２Vartti, Riita. “German matchmaking web-sites. Ongoing trafficking in women?” in Mirjana Morokvasic, Umut Ereland Kyoko Shinozaki (eds.): Gender and Migration: Crossing Borders and Shifting Boundaries. Vol 1: On the Move.
Opladen: Leske + Budrich (forthcoming).
Vishnevski, Anatoli “Migrations europeennes dans le nouveau contexte geopolitique.”In Migrants: les nouvelles´mobilités en Europe. Mirjana Morokvasic et Hedwig Rudolph eds. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1996.
Wallace Claire et al. “Spending Saving or Investing Social Capital: the Case of Shuttle Traders in Post-Communist
Central Europe.” East European Series 43 (1997).
Withol de Wenden, C. and Anne De Tinguy. L’Europe et toutes ses migrations. Bruxelles: Editions Complexe, 1995.
World Migration Report 2000, Geneva IOM, 2000.

45