General Comment No. 25: The right to participate in public affairs, votingrights and the right of equal access to public service (Art. 25) : . 12/07/96.
CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7, General Comment No. 25. (General Comments)
Convention Abbreviation: CCPR

GENERAL COMMENT 25

The right to participate in public affairs, voting rights andthe right of equal access to public service(Article 25)(Fiftyseventh session, 1996) (1) (2)Adopted by the Committee at its 1510th meeting (fiftyseventh session) on 12 July 1996. The
number in parenthesis indicates the session at which the general comment was adopted.
1. Article 25 of the Covenant recognizes and protects the right of every citizen to take part in theconduct of public affairs, the right to vote and to be elected and the right to have access to public
service. Whatever form of constitution or government is in force, the Covenant requires States toadopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to ensure that citizens have aneffective opportunity to enjoy the rights it protects. Article 25 lies at the core of democratic
government based on the consent of the people and in conformity with the principles of theCovenant.
2. The rights under article 25 are related to, but distinct from, the right of peoples to selfdetermination. By virtue of the rights covered by article 1 (1), peoples have the right to freely
determine their political status and to enjoy the right to choose the form of their constitution orgovernment. Article 25 deals with the right of individuals to participate in those processes whichconstitute the conduct of public affairs. Those rights, as individual rights, can give rise to claims
under the first Optional Protocol.
3. In contrast with other rights and freedoms recognized by the Covenant (which are ensured to
all individuals within the territory and subject to the jurisdiction of the State), article 25 protects
the rights of "every citizen". State reports should outline the legal provisions which define
citizenship in the context of the rights protected by article 25. No distinctions are permitted
between citizens in the enjoyment of these rights on the grounds of race, colour, sex, language,

religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Distinctions between those who are entitled to citizenship by birth and those who acquire it by
naturalization may raise questions of compatibility with article 25. State reports should indicate
whether any groups, such as permanent residents, enjoy these rights on a limited basis, forexample, by having the right to vote in local elections or to hold particular public servicepositions.
4. Any conditions which apply to the exercise of the rights protected by article 25 should bebased on objective and reasonable criteria. For example, it may be reasonable to require a higher
age for election or appointment to particular offices than for exercising the right to vote, whichshould be available to every adult citizen. The exercise of these rights by citizens may not besuspended or excluded except on grounds which are established by law and which are objective
and reasonable. For example, established mental incapacity may be a ground for denying aperson the right to vote or to hold office.
5. The conduct of public affairs, referred to in paragraph (a), is a broad concept which relates tothe exercise of political power, in particular the exercise of legislative, executive andadministrative powers. It covers all aspects of public administration, and the formulation andimplementation of policy at international, national, regional and local levels. The allocation ofpowers and the means by which individual citizens exercise the right to participate in the conductof public affairs protected by article 25 should be established by the constitution and other laws.
6. Citizens participate directly in the conduct of public affairs when they exercise power asmembers of legislative bodies or by holding executive office. This right of direct participation issupported by paragraph (b). Citizens also participate directly in the conduct of public affairs
when they choose or change their constitution or decide public issues through a referendum orother electoral process conducted in accordance with paragraph (b). Citizens may participate
directly by taking part in popular assemblies which have the power to make decisions about local
issues or about the affairs of a particular community and in bodies established to represent
citizens in consultation with government. Where a mode of direct participation by citizens isestablished, no distinction should be made between citizens as regards their participation on thegrounds mentioned in article 2, paragraph 1, and no unreasonable restrictions should be imposed.
7. Where citizens participate in the conduct of public affairs through freely chosen
representatives, it is implicit in article 25 that those representatives do in fact exercise
governmental power and that they are accountable through the electoral process for their exerciseof that power. It is also implicit that the representatives exercise only those powers which areallocated to them in accordance with constitutional provisions. Participation through freely
chosen representatives is exercised through voting processes which must be established by lawsthat are in accordance with paragraph (b).
8. Citizens also take part in the conduct of public affairs by exerting influence through publicdebate and dialogue with their representatives or through their capacity to organize themselves.
This participation is supported by ensuring freedom of expression, assembly and association.

9. Paragraph (b) of article 25 sets out specific provisions dealing with the right of citizens to takepart in the conduct of public affairs as voters or as candidates for election. Genuine periodic
elections in accordance with paragraph (b) are essential to ensure the accountability ofrepresentatives for the exercise of the legislative or executive powers vested in them. Suchelections must be held at intervals which are not unduly long and which ensure that the authorityof government continues to be based on the free expression of the will of electors. The rights andobligations provided for in paragraph (b) should be guaranteed by law.
10. The right to vote at elections and referenda must be established by law and may be subject
only to reasonable restrictions, such as setting a minimum age limit for the right to vote. It is
unreasonable to restrict the right to vote on the ground of physical disability or to impose literacy,
educational or property requirements. Party membership should not be a condition of eligibility
to vote, nor a ground of disqualification.
11. States must take effective measures to ensure that all persons entitled to vote are able toexercise that right. Where registration of voters is required, it should be facilitated and obstaclesto such registration should not be imposed. If residence requirements apply to registration, theymust be reasonable, and should not be imposed in such a way as to exclude the homeless fromthe right to vote. Any abusive interference with registration or voting as well as intimidation or
coercion of voters should be prohibited by penal laws and those laws should be strictly enforced.
Voter education and registration campaigns are necessary to ensure the effective exercise ofarticle 25 rights by an informed community.
12. Freedom of expression, assembly and association are essential conditions for the effective
exercise of the right to vote and must be fully protected. Positive measures should be taken to
overcome specific difficulties, such as illiteracy, language barriers, poverty, or impediments tofreedom of movement which prevent persons entitled to vote from exercising their rights
effectively. Information and materials about voting should be available in minority languages.
Specific methods, such as photographs and symbols, should be adopted to ensure that illiterate
voters have adequate information on which to base their choice. States parties should indicate intheir reports the manner in which the difficulties highlighted in this paragraph are dealt with.
13. State reports should describe the rules governing the right to vote, and the application of
those rules in the period covered by the report. State reports should also describe factors which
impede citizens from exercising the right to vote and the positive measures which have been
adopted to overcome these factors.
14. In their reports, States parties should indicate and explain the legislative provisions which
would deprive citizens of their right to vote. The grounds for such deprivation should beobjective and reasonable. If conviction for an offence is a basis for suspending the right to vote,the period of such suspension should be proportionate to the offence and the sentence. Persons
who are deprived of liberty but who have not been convicted should not be excluded fromexercising the right to vote.
15. The effective implementation of the right and the opportunity to stand for elective officeensures that persons entitled to vote have a free choice of candidates. Any restrictions on theright to stand for election, such as minimum age, must be justifiable on objective and reasonable
criteria. Persons who are otherwise eligible to stand for election should not be excluded byunreasonable or discriminatory requirements such as education, residence or descent, or byreason of political affiliation. No person should suffer discrimination or disadvantage of any kindbecause of that person's candidacy. States parties should indicate and explain the legislative
provisions which exclude any group or category of persons from elective office.
16. Conditions relating to nomination dates, fees or deposits should be reasonable and notdiscriminatory. If there are reasonable grounds for regarding certain elective offices asincompatible with tenure of specific positions (e.g. the judiciary, high-ranking military office,public service), measures to avoid any conflicts of interest should not unduly limit the rights
protected by paragraph (b). The grounds for the removal of elected office holders should beestablished by laws based on objective and reasonable criteria and incorporating fair procedures.
17. The right of persons to stand for election should not be limited unreasonably by requiringcandidates to be members of parties or of specific parties. If a candidate is required to have aminimum number of supporters for nomination this requirement should be reasonable and not act
as a barrier to candidacy. Without prejudice to paragraph (1) of article 5 of the Covenant,political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand forelection.
18. State reports should describe the legal provisions which establish the conditions for holding
elective public office, and any limitations and qualifications which apply to particular offices.
Reports should describe conditions for nomination, e.g. age limits, and any other qualifications
or restrictions. State reports should indicate whether there are restrictions which preclude persons
in public-service positions (including positions in the police or armed services) from being
elected to particular public offices. The legal grounds and procedures for the removal of elected
office holders should be described.
19. In conformity with paragraph (b), elections must be conducted fairly and freely on a periodic
basis within a framework of laws guaranteeing the effective exercise of voting rights. Persons
entitled to vote must be free to vote for any candidate for election and for or against any proposal
submitted to referendum or plebiscite, and free to support or to oppose government, without
undue influence or coercion of any kind which may distort or inhibit the free expression of theelector's will. Voters should be able to form opinions independently, free of violence or threat ofviolence, compulsion, inducement or manipulative interference of any kind. Reasonable
limitations on campaign expenditure may be justified where this is necessary to ensure that thefree choice of voters is not undermined or the democratic process distorted by thedisproportionate expenditure on behalf of any candidate or party. The results of genuine elections
should be respected and implemented.
20. An independent electoral authority should be established to supervise the electoral process
and to ensure that it is conducted fairly, impartially and in accordance with established laws
which are compatible with the Covenant. States should take measures to guarantee therequirement of the secrecy of the vote during elections, including absentee voting, where such asystem exists. This implies that voters should be protected from any form of coercion orcompulsion to disclose how they intend to vote or how they voted, and from any unlawful or
arbitrary interference with the voting process. Waiver of these rights is incompatible with article
25 of the Covenant. The security of ballot boxes must be guaranteed and votes should be counted
in the presence of the candidates or their agents. There should be independent scrutiny of thevoting and counting process and access to judicial review or other equivalent process so thatelectors have confidence in the security of the ballot and the counting of the votes. Assistanceprovided to the disabled, blind or illiterate should be independent. Electors should be fully
informed of these guarantees.
21. Although the Covenant does not impose any particular electoral system, any system
operating in a State party must be compatible with the rights protected by article 25 and must
guarantee and give effect to the free expression of the will of the electors. The principle of one
person, one vote, must apply, and within the framework of each State's electoral system, the voteof one elector should be equal to the vote of another. The drawing of electoral boundaries and themethod of allocating votes should not distort the distribution of voters or discriminate against
any group and should not exclude or restrict unreasonably the right of citizens to choose theirrepresentatives freely.
22. State reports should indicate what measures they have adopted to guarantee genuine, free andperiodic elections and how their electoral system or systems guarantee and give effect to the freeexpression of the will of the electors. Reports should describe the electoral system and explain
how the different political views in the community are represented in elected bodies. Reports
should also describe the laws and procedures which ensure that the right to vote can in fact befreely exercised by all citizens and indicate how the secrecy, security and validity of the voting
process are guaranteed by law. The practical implementation of these guarantees in the period
covered by the report should be explained.
23. Subparagraph (c) of article 25 deals with the right and the opportunity of citizens to haveaccess on general terms of equality to public service positions. To ensure access on general termsof equality, the criteria and processes for appointment, promotion, suspension and dismissal must
be objective and reasonable. Affirmative measures may be taken in appropriate cases to ensurethat there is equal access to public service for all citizens.
Basing access to public service on equal opportunity and general principles of merit, andproviding secured tenure, ensures that persons holding public service positions are free frompolitical interference or pressures. It is of particular importance to ensure that persons do not
suffer discrimination in the exercise of their rights under article 25, subparagraph (c), on any of
the grounds set out in article 2, paragraph 1.
24. State reports should describe the conditions for access to public service positions, any
restrictions which apply and the processes for appointment, promotion, suspension and dismissal
or removal from office as well as the judicial or other review mechanisms which apply to theseprocesses. Reports should also indicate how the requirement for equal access is met, and whether
affirmative measures have been introduced and, if so, to what extent.

25. In order to ensure the full enjoyment of rights protected by article 25, the free communicationof information and ideas about public and political issues between citizens, candidates andelected representatives is essential. This implies a free press and other media able to comment on
public issues without censorship or restraint and to inform public opinion. It requires the fullenjoyment and respect for the rights guaranteed in articles 19, 21 and 22 of the Covenant,including freedom to engage in political activity individually or through political parties andother organizations, freedom to debate public affairs, to hold peaceful demonstrations andmeetings, to criticize and oppose, to publish political material, to campaign for election and toadvertise political ideas.
26. The right to freedom of association, including the right to form and join organizations andassociations concerned with political and public affairs, is an essential adjunct to the rights
protected by article 25. Political parties and membership in parties play a significant role in the
conduct of public affairs and the election process. States should ensure that, in their internalmanagement, political parties respect the applicable provisions of article 25 in order to enablecitizens to exercise their rights thereunder.
27. Having regard to the provision of article 5, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, any rights
recognized and protected by article 25 may not be interpreted as implying a right to act or as
validating any act aimed at the destruction or limitation of the rights and freedoms protected by
the Covenant to a greater extent than what is provided for in the present Covenant.

Notes

1/ Adopted by the Committee at its 1510th meeting (fiftyseventh session) on 12 July 1996.
2/ The number in parenthesis indicates the session at which the general comment was adopted.

©1996-2001
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Geneva, Switzerland