Fusion energy: a time of potential andtransition
Published: Nov. 30, 2016 at 8:52 AM
Stewart Prager and Michael C. Zarnstorff, Princeton University
For centuries, humans have dreamed of harnessing the power of the sun to energize our lives here on Earth. But
we want to go beyond collecting solar energy, and one day generate our own from a mini-sun. If we're able tosolve an extremely complex set of scientiQc and engineering problems, fusion energy promises a green, safe,
unlimited source of energy. From just 1 kilogram of deuterium extracted from water per day could come enoughelectricity to power hundreds of thousands of homes.
Since the 1950s, scientiQc and engineering research has generated enormous progress toward forcing hydrogenatoms to fuse together in a self-sustaining reaction – as well as a small but demonstrable amount of fusionenergy. Skeptics and proponents alike note the two most important remaining challenges: maintaining thereactions over long periods of time and devising a material structure to harness the fusion power for electricity.
As fusion researchers at the Princeton Plasma Physics Lab, we know that realistically, the Qrst commercial fusion
power plant is still at least 25 years away. But the potential for its outsize beneQts to arrive in the second half of
this century means we must keep working. Major demonstrations of fusion's feasibility can be accomplishedearlier – and must, so that fusion power can be incorporated into planning for our energy future.
Unlike other forms of electrical generation, such as solar, natural gas and nuclear Qssion, fusion cannot bedeveloped in miniature and then be simply scaled up. The experimental steps are large and take time to build. But
the problem of abundant, clean energy will be a major calling for humankind for the next century and beyond. Itwould be foolhardy not to exploit fully this most promising of energy sources.
Why fusion power?
In fusion, two nuclei of the hydrogen atom (deuterium and tritium isotopes) fuse together. This is relatively
difQcult to do: Both nuclei are positively charged, and therefore repel each other. Only if they are moving extremely
fast when they collide will they smash together, fuse and thereby release the energy we're after.
This happens naturally in the sun. Here on Earth, we use powerful magnets to contain an extremely hot gas ofelectrically charged deuterium and tritium nuclei and electrons. This hot, charged gas is called a plasma.
The plasma is so hot – more than 100 million degrees Celsius – that the positively charged nuclei move fastenough to overcome their electrical repulsion and fuse. When the nuclei fuse, they form two energetic particles –an alpha particle (the nucleus of the helium atom) and a neutron.
Heating the plasma to such a high temperature takes a large amount of energy – which must be put into thereactor before fusion can begin. But once it gets going, fusion has the potential to generate enough energy tomaintain its own heat, allowing us to draw off excess heat to turn into usable electricity.

Fuel for fusion power is abundant in nature. Deuterium is plentiful in water, and the reactor itself can make tritiumfrom lithium. And it is available to all nations, mostly independent of local natural resources.
Fusion power is clean. It emits no greenhouse gases, and produces only helium and a neutron.
It is safe. There is no possibility for a runaway reaction, like a nuclear-Qssion "meltdown." Rather, if there is any
malfunction, the plasma cools, and the fusion reactions cease.
All these attributes have motivated research for decades, and have become even more attractive over time. But
the positives are matched by the signiQcant scientiQc challenge of fusion.
Progress to date
The progress in fusion can be measured in two ways. The Qrst is the tremendous advance in basic understandingof high-temperature plasmas. Scientists had to develop a new Qeld of physics – plasma physics – to conceive ofmethods to conQne the plasma in strong magnetic Qelds, and then evolve the abilities to heat, stabilize, control
turbulence in and measure the properties of the superhot plasma.
Related technology has also progressed enormously. We have pushed the frontiers in magnets, andelectromagnetic wave sources and particle beams to contain and heat the plasma. We have also developed
techniques so that materials can withstand the intense heat of the plasma in current experiments.
It is easy to convey the practical metrics that track fusion's march to commercialization. Chief among them is thefusion power that has been generated in the laboratory: Fusion power generation escalated from milliwatts for
microseconds in the 1970s to 10 megawatts of fusion power (at the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory) and
16 megawatts for one second (at the Joint European Torus in England) in the 1990s.
A new chapter in research
Now the international scientiQc community is working in unity to construct a massive fusion research facility inFrance. Called ITER (Latin for "the way"), this plant will generate about 500 megawatts of thermal fusion power for
about eight minutes at a time. If this power were converted to electricity, it could power about 150,000 homes. As
an experiment, it will allow us to test key science and engineering issues in preparation for fusion power plantsthat will function continuously.
ITER employs the design known as the "tokamak," originally a Russian acronym. It involves a doughnut-shaped
plasma, conQned in a very strong magnetic Qeld, which is partly created by electrical current that cows in theplasma itself.
Though it is designed as a research project, and not intended to be a net producer of electric energy, ITER willproduce 10 times more fusion energy than the 50 megawatts needed to heat the plasma. This is a huge scientiQc
step, creating the Qrst "burning plasma," in which most of the energy used to heat the plasma comes from thefusion reaction itself.
ITER is supported by governments representing half the world's population: China, the European Union, India,Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. It is a strong international statement about the need for, andpromise of, fusion energy.
The road forward

A look inside the ITER tokamak reactor. ITER
From here, the remaining path toward fusion power has two components. First, we must continue research on thetokamak. This means advancing physics and engineering so that we can sustain the plasma in a steady state formonths at a time. We will need to develop materials that can withstand an amount of heat equal to one-Qfth theheat cux on the surface of the sun for long periods. And we must develop materials that will blanket the reactor
core to absorb the neutrons and breed tritium.
The second component on the path to fusion is to develop ideas that enhance fusion's attractiveness. Four suchideas are:

The W-7X stellarator conQguration. Max-Planck Institute of Plasmaphysics, CC BY
1. Using computers, optimize fusion reactor designs within the constraints of physics and engineering. Beyond
what humans can calculate, these optimized designs produce twisted doughnut shapes that are highly stable andcan operate automatically for months on end. They are called "stellarators" in the fusion business.
2. Developing new high-temperature superconducting magnets that can be stronger and smaller than today'sbest. That will allow us to build smaller, and likely cheaper, fusion reactors.
3. Using liquid metal, rather than a solid, as the material surrounding the plasma. Liquid metals do not break,offering a possible solution to the immense challenge how a surrounding material might behave when it contacts
the plasma.
4. Building systems that contain doughnut-shaped plasmas with no hole in the center, forming a plasma shaped
almost like a sphere. Some of these approaches could also function with a weaker magnetic Qeld. These"compact tori" and "low-Qeld" approaches also offer the possibility of reduced size and cost.
Government-sponsored research programs around the world are at work on the elements of both components –and will result in Qndings that beneQt all approaches to fusion energy (as well as our understanding of plasmas in
the cosmos and industry). In the past 10 to 15 years, privately funded companies have also joined the effort,
particularly in search of compact tori and low-Qeld breakthroughs. Progress is coming and it will bring abundant,clean, safe energy with it.

Stewart Prager is a professor of astrophysical science and former director of the Princeton Plasma Physics
Laboratory at Princeton University. Michael C. Zarnstorff is deputy director for research at the Princeton Plasma
Physics Laboratory.

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

© 2016 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.