30 September 2021

The 9th SIGLOC-online: Pre & Post Self-Evaluation Results
COIL Promotion OfficeOsaka City University, Japan
1. Information on respondents:● Respondents are 30 participants out of 41, who completed the 9th SIGLOC-online program held from13th September to 24th September 2021
●Respondents evaluated their abilities related to Social Innovation before and after the program witha rubric having four (4) levels (Evaluation sheet is attached as a Reference)●Respondents’ countries/regions in residence and universities
County/Regionin ResidenceCambodiaUniversity

Number of RespondentsRoyal University of Phnom Penh

1

Brawijaya University

1

University of Indonesia

2

Osaka City University

6

Osaka Prefecture University

1

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

2

Misamis University

7

San Pedro College

4

I-Shou University

1

Chreso University

1

Mukuba University

4Indonesia

JapanMalaysia

Philippines

TaiwanZambia

Total

Total

130

2. Overall result● Below are the “Overall average scores of respondents by question (ability)”.

3. Results by Question (Ability)
Q1: Ability for basic understanding of problems
Criteria

Ability for basic understanding of problems

No. of Respondents
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I understand the sustainability of society and I am able toexplain it.

41

Level 2
Satisfactory

I understand the relationships between social economic
growth and/or economic development, and sustainability,
and I am able to explain them.

96

Level 3Good

I understand the relationships among social economic
growth, sustainability and policies, and I am able to explain
them.

85

Level 4
Excellent

I understand the relationships among economic growth andsustainability of society; and self-help, mutual-help andpublic-help, and I am able to explain them.

9182.63

3.33

Average Score+27%

2

Q2: Ability to discover/identify issues
Criteria

Ability to discover/identify issues

Level 1
Acceptable

No. of Respondents
PrePostI am able to explain social issues that are commonly sharedin a particular society to others.

32

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to explain social issues to people in othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between their own country and othercountries.

84

Level 3GoodI am able to discuss social issues with people from othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between my own country and othercountries; and discover/ identify issues.

1312

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to discuss social issues with people from othercountries, including differences in social and cultural
backgrounds (contexts) between my own country and othercountries; and discover universal issues.

6122.73

3.13

Average Score+15%

Q3: Ability to find creative solutions
Criteria

Ability to find creative solutions

No. of Respondents
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I am able to create solutions to social issues.

31

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to create solutions to social issues in the country
where they occur.

127

Level 3GoodI am able to create measures that can solve social issues insociety, and explain to people in other countries about why
those measures will lead to solving problems.

1015

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to create universal solutions to social issues, andexplain their applicability to any country.

572.57

2.93

Average Score+14%3

Q4: Ability to implement solutions (Collaboration/ Collective impact)
Criteria

Ability to implement solutions(Collaboration/ Collective impact)

No. of Respondents
PrePostLevel 1
Acceptable

I am able to list what is needed to implement solutions tosocial issues.

6

1

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to make a plan to implement solutions to socialissues.

10

7

Level 3GoodI am able to find relevant organizations and collaborators toadvance a plan to implement solutions to social issues.

98

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to discuss with representatives of relevantorganizations and collaborators in order to advance a planfor implementing solutions; and obtain an agreement ofcollaboration.

5142.43

3.17

Average Score+30%

Q5: Leadership
Criteria

No. of Respondents

Leadership

Pre

Post

Level 1
Acceptable

I am able to perform given tasks.

32

Level 2
Satisfactory

I am able to achieve given goals as a group member.

86

Level 3GoodI am able to achieve given goals as a group leader.

910

Level 4
Excellent

I am able to create and share goals for my team, and work
together to achieve them.

10122.87

3.07

Average Score+7%

4. Note:● Individual average total of 5 criteria: Pre=2.65, Post=3.13 (Increased +18%)

4

Reference: SIGLOC-online 2021 March Self-Evaluation Form5