DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYSUMMARY

JUNE 2020

Image courtesy of NASA

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYSUMMARY

JUNE 2020

This page left intentionally blankTABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ........................................ 1
Desired Conditions.......................................... 2
Strategic Context............................................ 3
Strategic Approach ........................................ 6
Conclusion....................................................... 10This page left intentionally blankDEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYEXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Department of Defense (DoD) is embarking on the most significant transformation in
the history of the U.S. national security space program. Space is now a distinct warfighting
domain, demanding enterprise-wide changes to policies, strategies, operations, investments,
capabilities, and expertise for a new strategic environment. This strategy identifies how
DoD will advance spacepower to enable the Department to compete, deter, and win in acomplex security environment characterized by great power competition.
Space is vital to our Nation’s security, prosperity, and scientific achievement. Space-based
capabilities are integral to modern life in the United States and around the world and are an
indispensable component of U.S. military power. Ensuring the availability of thesecapabilities is fundamental to establishing and maintaining military superiority across all
domains and to advancing U.S. and global security and economic prosperity. Space,however, is not a sanctuary from attack and space systems are potential targets at all levelsof conflict. In particular, China and Russia present the greatest strategic threat due to theirdevelopment, testing, and deployment of counterspace capabilities and their associatedmilitary doctrine for employment in conflict extending to space. China and Russia each have
weaponized space as a means to reduce U.S. and allied military effectiveness and challenge
our freedom of operation in space.
Rapid increases in commercial and international space activities worldwide add to thecomplexity of the space environment. Commercial space activities provide national andhomeland security benefits with new technologies and services and create new economic
opportunities in established and emerging markets. The same activities, however, also create
challenges in protecting critical technology, ensuring operational security, and maintaining
strategic advantages. Internationally, allies and partners also recognize the benefits of spacefor military operations, and increasingly understand the threats to those space activities.
Allies and partners who are actively expanding their defense space programs, present novel
opportunities to increase defense collaboration and cooperation.
In response to this new security environment, and in accordance with the 2018 National
Strategy for Space (NSfS) and the 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS), this Defense
Space Strategy (DSS) provides guidance to DoD for achieving desired conditions in spaceover the next 10 years. The DoD desires a secure, stable, and accessible space domain,
whose use by the United States and our allies and partners is underpinned by comprehensive,
sustained military strength. The strategy includes a phased approach for the defense
enterprise to move with purpose and speed across four lines of effort (LOEs): (1) build acomprehensive military advantage in space; (2) integrate space into national, joint, andcombined operations; (3) shape the strategic environment; and (4) cooperate with allies,
partners, industry, and other U.S. Government departments and agencies.
The Department is taking innovative and bold actions to ensure space superiority and tosecure the Nation’s vital interests in space now and in the future. Establishing the U.S.
Space Force (USSF) as the newest branch of our Armed Forces and the U.S. SpaceCommand (USSPACECOM) as a unified combatant command, as well as undertaking
significant space acquisition reform across the DoD, has set a strategic path to expand
spacepower for the Nation. It is a path that embraces space as a unique domain of national
military power that, together with the other domains, underpins multi-domain joint andcombined military operations to advance national security.
1

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYDESIRED CONDITIONSThis Defense Space Strategy (DSS) is designed to achieve the following desired conditionsat an accelerated pace over the next 10 years, focusing on the military application of
spacepower through control, exploitation, and influence of space to achieve strategic,
operational, and tactical objectives.

DESIRED CONDITIONS:The space domain is secure, stable, and accessible. The use of space by the UnitedStates and our allies and partners is underpinned by sustained, comprehensive U.S.
military strength. The United States is able to leverage our use of space to generate,
project, and employ power across all domains throughout the spectrum of conflict.

To achieve these desired conditions, DoD will advance spacepower through the pursuit of
the following defense objectives:
Maintain Space Superiority: DoD will establish, maintain, and preserve U.S. freedom of
operations in the space domain. DoD will be prepared to protect and defend U.S. and, as
directed, allied, partner, and commercial space capabilities and to deter and defeat adversary
hostile use of space.
Provide Space Support to National, Joint,
and Combined Operations: DoD spaceforces will deliver advanced space capabilities
and effects to enable national, joint, andcombined operations in any domain throughsustained, comprehensive space militaryadvantages. DoD will leverage and bolster athriving domestic civil and commercial spaceindustry.
Ensure Space Stability: In cooperation withallies and partners, DoD will maintainpersistent presence in space in order to: deter aggression in space; provide for safe transit
in, to, and through space; uphold internationally accepted standards of responsible behavior
as a good steward of space; and support U.S. leadership in space traffic management andthe long-term sustainability of outer space activities.

SPACEPOWER:

The sum of a nation’s capabilities to leverage space for diplomatic, information,
military, and economic activities in peace or war in order to attain national
objectives.

2

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYSTRATEGIC CONTEXTGreat power competition defines the strategic environment. Space is both a source of andconduit for national power, prosperity, and prestige. As a result, space is a domain that has
reemerged as a central arena of great power competition, primarily with China and Russia.

CENTRAL PROBLEM:

The U.S. defense space enterprise was not built for the current strategic environment.
The intentions and advancements of potential adversaries in space are threatening theability of the United States to deter aggression, to protect U.S. national interests, and tofight and win future conflicts.

More than any other nation, the United States relieson space-based capabilities to project and employ
power on a global scale. Today, U.S. reliance on
space has increased to the point where spacecapabilities not only enhance, but enable our way oflife and way of war. U.S. national security andprosperity require unfettered access to and freedom
to operate in the space domain.
The reemergence of great power competition and a
rapid expansion of allied, partner, and commercial
activities in space in recent years have drasticallychanged the character of the space domain. The actions, intentions, and military strategies
of potential adversaries have transformed space into a warfighting domain. In parallel,
growth in allied, partner, and commercial space capabilities has added complexity to thespace operating environment while creating an unprecedented level of collaborative
opportunities.
These factors amplify the need to strengthen the U.S. defense posture and present several
threats, challenges, and opportunities as the Department seeks to attain its desiredconditions.
THREATS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES
Threats: China and Russia present the most immediate and serious threats to U.S. space
operations, although threats from North Korea and Iran are also growing. Chinese andRussian strategic intentions and capabilities present urgent and enduring threats to the abilityof the Department to achieve its desired conditions in space. China and Russia haveanalyzed U.S. dependencies on space and have developed doctrine, organizations, andcapabilities specifically designed to contest or deny U.S. access to and operations in thedomain. Concurrently, their use of space is expanding significantly. Both countries consider
space access and denial as critical components of their national and military strategies.
Specifically, Chinese and Russian military doctrines indicate that they view space asimportant to modern warfare and consider the use of counterspace capabilities as a means
for reducing U.S., allied, and partner military effectiveness and for winning future wars.
China and Russia have weaponized space as a way to deter and counter a possible U.S.
intervention during a regional military conflict.
3

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGY

Challenges: Several factors may limit DoD’s ability to achieve its desired conditions: The DoD will continue to depend on space to project power and to respond rapidly

to crises worldwide to a greater extent than potential adversaries operating in theirrespective regions.

 The DoD has limited operational experience with conflict beginning in or

extending into space, despite rapid counterspace advancements by potential
adversaries.

 International

understanding and agreement of what constitutes unsafe,
irresponsible, or threatening behavior in space is nascent.

 U.S. activities, both terrestrial and in space, are increasingly exposed by advancesin potential adversary, rest-of-world, and commercial space-based capabilities,
impeding the U.S. military’s freedom of maneuver and action in all domains.
Meanwhile, potential adversaries are leveraging technological advancements in thecommercial space sector at decreased costs and broader accessibility to expand
their space technologies and capabilities.

 Public understanding of their reliance on space systems, the changing character ofthe space domain, and the significantly growing counterspace threats to the UnitedStates and its allies and partners remains cursory.

COUNTERSPACE CONTINUUM

Opportunities: The emerging strategic environment also presents numerous opportunities
that may enhance the Department’s ability to attain its desired conditions: National leadership recognizes the criticality of space to national security andprosperity. Space, including space security, is a top national priority with increasing
resources to ensure continued U.S. leadership in this critical domain. Strategic
guidance, including the National Security Strategy, the NDS, and the NSfS
underscore the Nation’s vital interest of unfettered access to, and freedom tooperate in, space.

4

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGY The creation of new space-focused organizations in DoD offers an historic

opportunity to reform every aspect of our defense space enterprise. The USSF,
the newest branch of the Armed Forces, will bring unity, focus, and advocacy toorganizing, training, and equipping space forces. USSPACECOM, the newest
combatant command, will bring additional
operational focus to deterring threats and shaping
the security environment in space. Concurrent withongoing space acquisition activities within the
Department of the Air Force, the Space
Development Agency was established under a newmodel for rapid acquisition to rapidly develop andfield new space capabilities. Taken together, theestablishmentof
theseorganizations
institutionalizes the commitment of both thelegislative and executive branches of government to champion strategic change
across the national security space enterprise. These new institutions bring focus
and momentum to addressing current and future challenges.

 New leadership and management for space acquisition has been established tounify the Department’s space acquisition efforts into a streamlined structure forbetter integration and speed of delivery. A new Assistant Secretary of the Air Forcefor Space Acquisition and Integration ASAF(A&I), along with a new Space Force
Acquisition Council (SFAC), will simplify the leadership and synchronization of
the DoD’s space development efforts by overseeing and directing: the Space
Development Agency, the Space and Missile Systems Center, and the Space Rapid
Capabilities Office. When the transfer of the Space Development Agency iscompleted, the Department will have a new unified structure.

 The United States has long maintained a robust and prolific arrangement ofalliances and partnerships built on trust, common values, and shared national
interests. This approach creates an important advantage for the United States andits allies and partners. Many U.S. allies and partners acknowledge space as anintegral component of their respective national security strategies and recognize
the increasing counterspace threats posed by potential adversaries. As a result,they are increasingly interested in collaborating in the development of spacecapabilities, sharing space-related information and intelligence, and partnering inspace operations to secure access to, and ensure freedom of action in, space.

 Commercial space activities have expanded significantly in both volume anddiversity, resulting in new forms of commercial capabilities and services thatleverage commoditized, off-the-shelf technologies and lower barriers for market
entry. These developments are contributing to a burgeoning space industry driven
by entrepreneurial innovation and investment, advanced technology, decreased
costs, and increased demand for space-based services. The DoD has anopportunity to leverage innovation and cost-effective investments driven by theprivate sector, presenting opportunities for collaboration to develop gamechanging capabilities with a more streamlined and responsive acquisition process.
5DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYSTRATEGIC APPROACH
The Department is rapidly transforming its approach to space from a support function to a
warfighting domain in order to achieve our desired conditions and strategic objectives overthe next 10 years in the face of identified threats, challenges, and opportunities.

CENTRAL IDEA:The Department will grow its spacepower capacity over the next 10 years to ensure
space superiority and secure the Nation’s vital interests. The Department will take action
rapidly to leverage opportunities and U.S. strengths in close cooperation with our allies,
partners, and industry.

Generating an enduring superior spacepower
capacity will take a number of years and will
require DoD to rely in the near-term on
enhancing existing capabilities.
The
Department will expand its space partnerships
and will establish new and deeper pathways tocollaborate with allies, partners, industry, andother U.S. Government departments andagencies,makingcooperation
andcollaboration a matter of course in futurecapability development and operations. These
actions will be undertaken while theDepartment builds comprehensive military
spacepower through a trained and ready force
that is integrated into Joint Force plans to
support the Department’s objectives to compete, deter, and win across the spectrum of
conflict. This will require embracing space as a unique domain of national and military
power while also embracing principles of joint warfare.
The Department will pursue the following prioritized lines of effort (LOEs) to achieve
our desired conditions while addressing identified threats, opportunities, and challenges:
1) Build a comprehensive military advantage in space.
2) Integrate military spacepower into national, joint, and combined
operations.
3) Shape the strategic environment.
4) Cooperate with allies, partners, industry, and other U.S. Government
departments and agencies.

6

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYLOE 1: Build a comprehensive military advantage in space. The Department must
transform its space enterprise by: reforming its organizations; fielding resilient architectures;
building capabilities to counter hostile uses of space; and developing spacepower expertise,
doctrine,
andoperational
concepts
commensurate with the threat. DoD willdevelop an agile space enterprise that can takeadvantage of emerging technological andcommercial innovation in order to continually
outpace adversary threats. Space superiority
will be achieved through on-orbit, multidomain, and cross-component operations thatare fully integrated with our allies and partners.
The establishment of the USSF as a new
branch of the Armed Forces offers a historicand immediate opportunity to rapidlytransform the enterprise to achieve spacesuperiority.
Additionally, the creation of a
new ASAF (A&I) and SFAC will further unify
DoD space acquisition efforts, improving the synchronization of space systems andprograms and ensuring integration across the national security space enterprise. DoD
components will prioritize necessary resources for this LOE for the duration of the DSS
timeframe. Specific objectives include: Build out the U.S. Space Force.
 Develop and document doctrinal foundations of military spacepower.
 Develop and expand space warfighting expertise and culture.
 Field assured space capabilities.
 Develop and field capabilities that counter hostile use of space.
 Improve intelligence and command and control (C2) capabilities that enable

military advantage in the space domain.

LOE 2: Integrate military spacepower into national, joint, and combined operations.
Military spacepower achieves its greatest potential when combined with all other forms of
military power. The integration of superior space capabilities into and throughout the Joint
Force, along with operational integration with allies and partners, is essential for securing
our military advantage against threats in space. As DoD builds superior space forces, it must
further develop and enhance integration of space warfighting doctrine, capabilities, andpersonnel into national, joint, and combined operations. The establishment of
USSPACECOM as a new combatant command provides a full-time operational focus on
deterrence, integration, and employment of military spacepower. DoD components willprioritize necessary resources for this LOE for the duration of the DSS timeframe. Specificobjectives include:
7

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGY Enable USSPACECOM to plan, exercise, and execute joint and combined space

operations across the spectrum of conflict.

 Realign operational authorities and update rules of engagement.
 Integrate space warfighting operations, intelligence, capabilities, and personnel into

military plans and staffs.

 Update security classification for DoD space programs.
 Integrate allies and partners into plans, operations, exercises, engagements, andintelligence activities.

LOE 3: Shape the strategic environment. DoD will deter aggression and attacks in space
and, if deterrence fails, be capable of winning wars that extend into space. Additionally, DoD
will take actions that enhance domain stability and reduce the potential for miscalculations.
In this context, international views about space as a warfighting domain and what constitutes
acceptable and unacceptable behavior in that domain are nascent or, in some cases, nonexistent.
DoD will partner with the
Department of State (DoS) to work closelywith allies and partners in order to develop
common understandings of appropriate
behavior in space. The United States must alignwith allies and partners to engage proactively
and assertively with the wider international
community,
includingwithpotential
adversaries, to advance U.S., allied, and partner
national security interests and to reduce thepossibility of mishaps and misperceptions.
This LOE must be executed in close
cooperation with DoS and across all key DoD
components, utilizing appropriate authorities,
without adversely affecting space capability development, production, and fielding activities.
Overall, LOE 3 activities are enduring but critical in the near-term in order to leverage U.S.
strengths as the Department develops space warfighting policy and builds associatedwarfighting capacity.
Specific objectives include: Inform international and public audiences of growing adversarial threats in space.
 Deter adversary aggression against the space capabilities of the United States andits allies, partners, and commercial interests.

 Coordinate space messaging.
 Promote standards and norms of behavior in space favorable to U.S., allied, andpartner interests.

8

DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYLOE 4: Cooperate with allies, partners, industry, and other U.S. Government
departments and agencies. Partnering is both inherent in the first three LOEs and a
distinct LOE in its own right. In close
partnership with key U.S. departments andagencies, DoD must enhance spacecooperation with international partners andcommercial entities, many of whose spacecapabilities are already integral to collective
security. DoD will promote burden-sharing
with our allies and partners, developing andleveraging cooperative opportunities in policy,
strategy, capabilities, and operational realms.
Pursuit of LOE 4 will be ongoing, with themost significant attention needed in the shortterm to lay foundations for benefits over the
long-term. Specific objectives include: Expand information sharing relationships with capable allies and partners.
 Align with allies and partners on space policy.
 Join with allies, partners, and other U.S. Government departments and agencies topromote favorable standards and norms of behavior in space.

 Expand cooperative research, development, and acquisition (RD&A) with allies

and partners.

 Leverage commercial technological advancements and acquisition processes.
 Modernize DoD’s approach to the commercial licensing approval process.

9DEFENSE SPACE STRATEGYCONCLUSION
This strategy provides an opportunity to build
upon existing work by taking immediate andenduring steps to generate and employ a superior
spacepower capacity. Successful implementationof this strategy requires embracing space activities
as a unique source of national and military power
and incorporating the principles of joint warfare
into space operations. Implementation of thestrategy will posture the Department to achieve
its strategic objectives with the necessaryprioritization of resources and risk management
to advance U.S. national interests.

10This page left intentionally blank2