令和元年 11 月 29 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 036 号

本資料は、インドネシアで初めての日系知的財産コンサルタント会社であるハキンダ・インターナショナルが、インドネシア及びその近隣諸国の知財関連ニュースを英語で提供するものです。本文内容の無断での転載、再配信、掲示板への掲載等はお断りいたします。
情報の内容につきましては正確を期すように努めておりますが、正確性を保証するものではありません。本情報の利用の結果発生するいかなる不利益に対しましてもその責任を負いませんので予めご了承願います。

<Indonesia> Mark: Case “BENSU”
In case No. 48/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, the judges decide that lawsuit filed by Ruben Samuel Onsu (plaintiff)
regarding the cancellation of mark “Bensu” No. IDM000622427 (class 43) owned by Jessy Handalim (defendant) cannot beaccepted. Further, Director of Mark confirming that the plaintiff lost the case but later it is known that the plaintiff purchased thesaid mark and the assignment has been processed.
Previously, in the said case, the plaintiff asked Commercial Court of Central Jakarta to cancel the registration of mark “Bensu”
No. IDM000622427 in class 43 owned by defendant because it has similarity with the name of famous person (bensu) and it wasfiled with having bad faith. The plaintiff is a famous artist in Indonesia and has a nickname “bensu”.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 28 June 2019)<Indonesia> LEVI STRAUSS WON THE MARK CASE
In case No. 56/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, the judges decide that Tomi Yomriko (defendant) is infringing the wellknown “arcuate device” marks No. IDM000005515 and IDM000005518 in class 25 owned by Levis Strauss & Co. (plaintiff). Thejudges ask the defendant to stop using the said mark including to stop all activities related to the said mark. However, theplaintiff’s claim that the defendant must pay compensation for damage by Rp4.52 billion is refused.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 4 July 2019)<Indonesia> Mark Case: “DOMINO”
In case No. 41/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, Judges refuse to cancel the registration of mark “Domino” No.
IDM000359520 and IDM000182444 in class 30 owned by Endy Sitio (defendant). Previously, Dominos IP Holder LLC (plaintiff)
asks Commercial Court of Central Jakarta to cancel the said marks owned by defendant because they have similarity with marks“Domino’s” and “Domino’s Pizza” owned by the Plaintiff. Meanwhile, Director of Mark states that the defendant is the first party
who has the mark right in Indonesia.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 9 July 2019)<Indonesia> Mark Case: “Kinco and Logo”
In case No. 471/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019, Supreme Court agrees to cancel the registration of mark “Kinco dan Logo” No.
IDM000619419 owned by Holicindo Desa Anugerah (defendant) because it has similarity with mark “Kinco and Logo” owned byKinco Group Company Limited (plaintiff). Previously, in case No.38/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, Commercial Court ofCentral Jakarta cannot accept the said lawsuit filed by the plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 10 July 2019)1

令和元年 11 月 29 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 036 号<Indonesia> Case Mark: Novell Lost
In case No. 22/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, judges refused to cancel the decision of Mark Appeal Commission(defendant) which previously refused the application of registration of mark “Pil Merek Hati” in Class 5 owned by PT Novell
Pharmaceutical (plaintiff) because it has similarity in its essential part with mark “HATI” No. IDM000194847.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 15 July 2019)<Indonesia> Mark Case: “SCOTT”
In case No. 50/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst, Scott USA Limited (plaintiff) and by Andrian Arianto Tenggono (defendant)
have reached a peaceful settlement upon the said case. Previously, the plaintiff asks Commercial Court of Central Jakarta to cancel
the registration of mark “Scott” No. IDM000044156 class 12 owned by defendant because it has similarity with well-known mark“Scott” owned by the plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 17 July 2019)<Indonesia> Mark Case: “STELLA”
In case No. 26/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN. Niaga Sby, the judges agree to cancel the registration registration of mark “Stella”
No. IDM000191567 class 3 owned by Budi Wardana (defendant) because it has similarity with mark “STELLA” No.
IDM000450050 in class 3 owned Godrej Mid East Holding Limited (plaintiff).
(Bisnis Indonesia, 17 July 2019)<Indonesia> Mark Case: “Alstyle”
In case No. 3/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst, Judges agree to cancel the registration of mark “Alstyle Device” No.
IDM000552947 in class 25 owned by Darmanto (defendant) because it has similarity with marks “ALSTYLE” No.
D002017044486 and No. D002018041994 owned by Gildan Activewear SRL (Plaintiff).
(Bisnis Indonesia, 23 July 2019)<Indonesia> Update of Mark Case: “AMANAH”
Judges of Commercial Court of Central Jakarta decide that the herein below lawsuit No. 64/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst
filed by PT Aneka Boga Citra (plaintiff) cannot be accepted. Previously, plaintiff asked Commercial Court of Central Jakarta tocancel the registration of mark “Jahe Merah Super Amanah” No. IDM000578443 owned by Suwandi Tanuwijaya (defendant)
because it has similarity with marks “Amh Amanah” No. IDM000534636 and “Amh” No. IDM000451140 owned by the plaintiff.
In addition, the plantiff also ask UD Cipta Mandiri Abadi (defendant 1) and Sunarto (defendant 2) for pay compensation fordamages because of using similar marks (Amanah).
(Bisnis Indonesia, 25 July 2019)<Indonesia> Apology Notice: “LOIS”
RANDI REDIFAN and RANKI REDIFAN domiciled in West Jakarta, apologizes to PT. INTIGARMINDO PERSADA (owner ofmark right “LOIS”) because of using mark “LOIS”, producing, and distributing products using the said mark without any right.
They will also withdraw all the said products from the market.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 29 July 2019)<Indonesia> Trademark Case: “Type-R”
In case No. 42/Pdt.Sus-H.C/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Honda Motor Co. Ltd. (plaintiff) asks Commercial Court to cancel theregistration of mark “Type-R” No. IDM000031227 and IDM000344428 owned by Handy Wijaya (defendant) because it has2

令和元年 11 月 29 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 036 号

similarity with well-known mark “Civic Type-R” No. D002018008164 and “Honda Type-R” No. D002018008166 owned by theplaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 8 August 2019)<Indonesia> Trademark Case: “Chint”
In case No. 40/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co. Ltd. (plaintiff) asks Commercial Court tocancel the registration of mark “Chint” No. IDM000559907 in class 9 (electrical apparatuses/instrument) owned by Huang Yang
Wu (defendant) because it has similarity with mark “Chint” No. D002019010896 owned by the plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 19 August 2019)<Indonesia> IP Online Filing System
This week, DGIP will implement the online system for IP filing to increase the receipt of PNBP (non-tax income) which targetedto achieve Rp500 billions this year. In addition, the online system is aimed to help regional applicants that it will be easier forthem to file an application. However, this system is vulnerable in case there is a power blackout or IT problems. Hopefully,
DGIP still provide manual filing system to anticipate this kind of problem.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 20 August 2019)<Indonesia> Notification and Warning
PT Kapal Api Global as the owner of the fame mark “KAPAL API”, hereby notifies and warns any party not toproduce/distribute/sell products using the same marks in order to avoid any legal action.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 21 August 2019)<Indonesia> Supreme Court Decision on Design Case
Supreme Court in case No. 407K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019 refused to the appeal of PT Solihin Jaya Industri (plaintiff) and decide thatChung She (defendant) is the owner of industrial designs of wheel barrow No.0025632-D, No.ID0020550-D and ID0020554-D.
The plaintiff also must pay compensation by Rp1.25 billion to the defendant.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 27 August 2019)<Indonesia> Supreme Court Decision on Mark “INDEX”
Supreme Court in case No. 72 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018 decided that Index Company Limited is the owner of well-known mark“Index”. Supreme Court also asked DGIP to cancel the registration of mark “Index” in the name of Ijek Widya Krisnadi/Kasno inclasses 11, 21, 35, 42, and 45 because it was filed with having bad faith and has similarity with mark “Index” owned by Index
Company Limited.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 29 August 2019)<Indonesia> Trademark Case: “Dieselindustri”
In case No. 37/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Diesel S.p.A (plaintiff) asks Commercial Court to cancel theregistration of mark “Dieselindustri” No. IDM000487465 in class 25 owned by William Pramono (defendant) because it has
similarity with well-known mark “Diesel” owned by the plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 30 August 2019)3

令和元年 11 月 29 日発行
インドネシア知財ニュース第 036 号<Indonesia> Supreme Court Decision on Mark “Pierre Cardin”
Supreme Court in case No. 47 PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2018 refused the PK submitted by Pirre Cardin (plaintiff) and refused to cancel
the registration of mark “Pierre Cardin” owned by Alexander satryo Wibowo (defendant) because the plaintiff had previously
filed the same case in 1981. In Indonesian law, the court cannot make a trial for the same cases twice.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 2 September 2019)<Indonesia> Trademark Case: “Chelsea”
In case No. 27/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst, Hardiman (plaintiff) asks Commercial Court to cancel the registrationof logo mark “Chelsea” No. IDM000516139 and “Chelsea FC” No. IDM000524568 in class 25 owned by Chelsea Football Club
(defendant) because they have similarity with device mark “Chelsea ” No. IDM000249835 owned by the plaintiff.
(Bisnis Indonesia, 26 September 2019)4