JTTRI SeminarJakarta, 14 February 2020

PROBLEMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PRIORITY OF URBAN RAILWAY NETWORKPROJECT : JAKARTAOUTLINE• DKI Jakarta Mobility Condition• Motorization Scenarios• Public Mass Transportation System Network in DKI Jakarta
Existing Condition• Public Mass Transportation System Network Indications for DKIJakarta 2030
• Public Transportation System Implementation Hierarchy

DKI JAKARTA MOBILITY CONDITIONSM O T O R I Z AT I O N
MOTORIZATION GROWTH IS NOT PARALLEL WITH THE PROVISION OFPUBLIC TRANSPORTCongestion continues to increase with motorization and urbanization. District utilization
change and economy growth also increases the movement needs that need to be facilitated bypublic transportation.
Congestion and Lack of Public
Transportation Quality in Jabodetabek

Congestion
aroundRagunan occurs with thenearby TB Simatupang
business area which has alarge generation andattraction.

External impacts such as wasted time, air
pollution and the declining of public healthMotorization will continue to increase without
network development(“Do-Nothing Scenario”)

STRATEGY FOR
IMPROVING PUBLIC
TRANSPORT ION
MARKET SHAREPOLICY DIRECTIONACCESSIBILITY-ORIENTED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENTACTIVITY PLACE

LIVING PLACE

Proportion of Private Vehicle and Public Transportation Users•Park and Ride• Feeder•Taxi StandServices• PedestrianFacilities• Bicycle Paths

USE OF PRIVATE VEHICLE•••

Feeder Services •Pedestrian
Facilities•Bicycle Paths•Transfer
Facilities
Park andRide
Taxi StandCHEAPER AND FASTERUSE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

Network Development and Transportation
Policy will reduce motorization(“Do-Something Scenario”)

Capital Split Trend and Scenarios 2010 – 2050
(Do Something)2010

201920252030

2040

2050

Public Mode

27%

20%

22%26%30%

40%

Private Mode

73%

80%

78%

74%

70%60%

MOTORIZATION SCENARIOHigh Motorization Rate

“Roads and Public Transportations
Play Important Roles in UrbanMobility ”• The increase of Road Ratio from 15% -20%
• Massive Road Development - HighInfrastructure Investment • Inefficient Transportation System• Road Capacity vs. Traffic Volume• The increase of Air Pollution

The Road Ratio and Public
Transportation Ratio in Jakarta
are still low compared to other
cities in the world&Low Motorization Rate
• To manage the growth in the use ofPrivate Vehicles• Development Priorities of the Mass
Public Transportation System• Big investment - exploratory of KPBU(PPP) project• More efficient Transportation System• Better Environtment

PA R I STOK YO

PUBLIC MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN DKI JAKARTA
Existing Condition• The condition of mass public transportation in
DKI Jakarta is still not well developed.
• Based on the Macro Transportation Pattern(PTM) recommends four modes of public
transportation that are needed to overcome
the transportation problems comprehensively.
• In line with the development of existingmodes, it is also necessary to take steps tolimit the use of private vehicles by restricting
the traffic.
• Scenarios’ development with the priority ofdeveloping public transportation systems withvarious alternatives, including scenarios for
implementing
Transport
DemandManagement.

PUBLIC MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM NETWORK INDICATIONS IN DKI
JAKARTA 2030
• MRT I Lebak Bulus-Bundaran HI (2019)• LRT Jakarta (2020)• LRT Jabodebek (2022)• LRT Jakarta Velodrom-Manggarai (2022)• MRT Phase II Bundaran HI - Kota (2024)• Jakarta Loopline (2024)• MRT East-West (2028)
Constraints and obstacles to pursue
infrastructure development targets• The great need for funding/financing,inadequate government fiscal• Limited number of competent humanresources• High demand for construction material andequipment sources• Supporting policies that is still need to beformulated• Institutional and regulatory support

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION HIERARCHYCENTRAL GOVERNMENTJABODETABEK RAILWAY SYSTEM▪ Tangerang Line
▪ Serpong Line▪ Bogor –Depok Central Line▪ Bekasi Line
▪ Loop Line▪ Tanjung Priok LineDKI JAKARTA PROVINCE LOCAL GOVERNMENTFEEDER SYSTEM &RESTRUCTURED REGULER BUS
SYSTEM

NON MOTORIZED TRANSPORT :▪ Pedestrian▪ Bicycle
TaxiParatransit

THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMDEVELOPMENT• Efficiency to support economic growth• Justice/equality in community mobility, including:• promoting the use of public transportation• reduction of traffic jams rate.

MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMBACKBONE (JAKARTA)▪ Transjakarta Busway(15 coridors)▪ MRT Lebak Bulus-Kota▪ MRT East-West▪ Proposed New LRT Lines

PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENTCONCEPT• Transportation System Flexibility• Ease of Developing Transportation Systems• Inter-modes Integration• Integration of Transportation Systems and Land Use• Long-term Development Consistency• Consistency between areas/regions in JABODETABEKFUNDING OPTION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE

Cooperation between the Government andBusiness Entities (KPBU/PPP) in the provisionof infrastructure for public interest refers to thespecifications that have been predetermined by
the Person in Charge of the Cooperation
Project (PJPK), which partially or completely
uses the resources of the business entity byhaving regard to the risk management between
the parties.

KEY OF UNDERSTANDING

COOPERATIONPUBLICINTERESTPREDETERMINEDSPECIFICATIONPARTIAL ORCOMPLETE
BUSINESS ENTITY’SRESOURCESRISKMANAGEMENTPARTNERSHIPCOMPETITIVE

EFFECTIVE

BENEFITSRISKS CONTROL AND
MANAGEMENTEFFICIENTKPBU/PPP PRINCIPLES

19 TYPES OF KBPU (PPP) INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS
Roads

Transportation

Oil and Gas &Renewable Energy

Electricity

Energy Conservation

Telecommunication &Informatics

Airports
Roads

Ports

Power Plants
Public Street
Lighting

Highway

Railway

Transmission

Fiber Optic
e-Gov

Highway Bridge

Land andCrossing

CONNECTIVITY
SOCIAL FACILITIESURBAN FACILITIESDrinking Water

Local Waste
Management

Centralized Waste
Management

Tourism

Education Facilities

Correctional
Institution

Area/Park

HealthCommunity/Residents
Housing
Traditional
MarketWaste/Garbage
Management

Natural Resources& Irrigation

Urban Facilities

Sports, Arts andCulture Facilities

9INVESTMENT RETURN PATTERNAVAILABILITY PAYMENTUSER FEE
APBN/APBD
Allocation

KPBU/PPP
Agreement

User
Tarif

KPBU/PPP
Agreement

User

Business Entity

Business
EntityCreditAgreement

Contractor
Contractor

Operator

CreditAgreement

Operator

Definition● Periodic payment by the Minister/Institutional Head/Regional Head to theImplementing Business Entity on the availability of infrastructure services that are inaccordance with the quality and/or criteria as specified in the KBPU/PPP Agreement

10KPBU/PPP SCHEME WITH RETURNS FROM AVAILABILITY PAYMENT (AP)AP Payment Towards Service Standards (SLA)
Public Expenditures in Conventional Schemes
Rp

The Benefits of AP :Construction Payment

40•Operation &Maintenance Payment

40Unexpected risks / costs borneby the publicTotal Expenditures

290

40
100

100

5551234556Payment towards SLA:

557•

Sustainability: Planning-construction-operationmaintenance stages
On schedule, on budget, on service

8595105115Year

12Full APSLA

Public Expenditures in APFull AP – Penalty

Penalty

SLANo Construction Payment
RpRisks transferred to private
sector and regulated byprivate sector.

Availability Payment (AP)

28
12328
428
528
628
728
8928
1028

28

1112

Total Expenditures

MinimumStandards
Regulated

Business Entity
Actual

280

28

Year

Minimum Service Standards for the availability of:
1. Rail-based Mass Transportation Capacity
2.Headway, Waiting time and Travel time according to theoperating plan

Sumber: LKPP

11