Exhibit 1.02

The Procter & Gamble Company
Conflict Minerals Report

This Conflict Minerals Report for the year ended December 31, 2013 is provided by The Procter & Gamble Company (the “Company
Company””) in compliance with Rule13p
13p--1 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Rule
Rule””). Under the Rule, we are required to make specific disclosures regarding ourmanufactured products that contain conflict minerals, provided those conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. As
defined by the Rule, and for purposes of this report, the conflict minerals are cassiterite, columbite
columbite--tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives, which are
limited to tin, tantalum, and tungsten ((““Conflict Minerals
Minerals””; tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold collectively are referred to as “3TG
3TG””). References in this report to
“we,
we,”
”“
“us
us”
” or “ourour”” refers to the Company and our subsidiaries, unless otherwise specified or unless the context otherwise requires.
As detailed below, based on our reasonable country of origin inquiry, the Company has no reason to believe that the 3TG in any of our products is funding
armed conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (collectively, the “Covered Countries
Countries””) . However, because this is the first yearof reporting under the Rule, it has been challenging for many companies and their suppliers (including us and our suppliers) to gather complete and reliable
data. For that reason, we have not been able to rule out the possibility that some Conflict Minerals in our products may have originated in the Covered
Countries and may not be from recycled or scrap sources. Consequently, we exercised due diligence on the Conflict Minerals
Minerals’’ origin and chain of custody, andwe are providing this Conflict Minerals Report to describe our due diligence processes and results.
1. Company Overview
The Company is a global leader in retail goods, focused on providing branded consumer packaged goods of superior quality and value to our consumers
around the world. Our products are sold in more than 180 countries and territories primarily through mass merchandisers, grocery stores, membership club
stores, drug stores, department stores, salons, highhigh--frequency stores and distributors. We have on
on--thethe--ground operations in approximately 70 countries,
including more than 130 plants and more than 250 shipping locations worldwide. In total, across all aspects of our business (e.g., raw materials, packaging,
services, equipment), we work with approximately 80,000 suppliers.
The Company sells more than 300 branded products. The vast majority of these products do not contain Conflict Minerals. Based on an extensive review ofour brands, only a small number of products were identified as within the scope of the Rule: blades and razors, batteries, electric charging devices, electric
toothbrushes, powered beauty devices and small electronic appliances.
2. Compliance Systems and Due Diligence
Our Conflict Minerals Program has been designed to conform, in all material respects, with the framework described in The Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development ((“
“OECD
OECD”
”) Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chain of Minerals from Conflict
Conflict--Affected and High
High--Risk Areas(“OECD Guidance
Guidance””) and the related Supplements for gold and for tin, tantalum and tungsten. We are a “downstream company
company”” within the meaning of theOECD Guidance, and, therefore, have designed our Conflict Minerals Program in a manner consistent with the guidance specifically applicable to downstream
companies in the OECD Guidance.
a) Conflict Minerals Policy
The Company has adopted a Conflict Minerals Policy, which is publicly available on our website at
http://www.pg.com/en_US/sustainability/policies_practices/conflict_minerals.shtml
http://www.pg.com/en_US/sustainability/policies_practices/conflict_minerals.shtml..
b) Internal Management Systems and Controlsi) Compliance TeamIn order to facilitate our compliance with the Rule, the Company created a multi
multi--functional core team ((““Core TeamTeam””), which includes representatives fromPurchases, Product Supply, Sustainability, Research & Development, Finance & Accounting, Global Business Services, Corporate Communications, Corporate
Compliance and Legal. The Core Team designed our Conflict Minerals Program, including, but not limited to, processes for supply chain review, supplier andemployee outreach, due diligence and risk management. Senior management has been briefed about the progress of our Conflict Minerals Program efforts.
ii) Control Systems
As a downstream company, the Company does not generally have a direct relationship with 3TG smelters and refiners. Consequently, we are engaging withother companies through trade associations and industry initiatives, such as the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition
Coalition--Global ee--Sustainability Initiative
Initiative’’s(“EICCEICC--GeSI
GeSI””) Conflict
Conflict--Free Sourcing Initiative ((“
“CFSI
CFSI”
”), to improve disclosure of upstream participants in the supply chain.
In addition to our Conflict Minerals Policy, our work is governed by:● the Company
Company’’s Worldwide Business Conduct Manual, which contains the global standards P&G employees must follow to ensure they uphold P&G
P&G’’sPurpose, Values and Principles in their daily work (available at
http://www.pg.com/en_US/downloads/company/governance/Policy_Worldwide_Business_Conduct_Manual.pdf
http://www.pg.com/en_US/downloads/company/governance/Policy_Worldwide_Business_Conduct_Manual.pdf)),● our Sustainability Guidelines for Suppliers, which outline the values we seek in the suppliers with whom we do business (available at
http://www.pgsupplier.com/en/pg
http://www.pgsupplier.com/en/pg--values/sustainability.shtml
values/sustainability.shtml),), and● our Human Rights Policy Statement, which outlines our commitment to respect human rights and the expectation that our business partners share
this commitment (available at http://pgsupplier.com/en/_downloads/Human_Rights_Policy_Statement.pdf
http://pgsupplier.com/en/_downloads/Human_Rights_Policy_Statement.pdf).).
iii) Supplier Engagement
Soon after the Rule was adopted, we began engaging with our suppliers to ensure they were aware of the Rule and the implications for them as suppliers of theCompany. The Company sent mailings to all Company suppliers that we anticipated would be within the scope of the Rule, informing them that the Rule had
been finalized and of the Company
Company’’s expectation that each supplier would have a conflict minerals policy in place and implement a system to trace the origin ofany 3TG supplied to the Company. The mailing included a letter that explained the upcoming due diligence process, together with a link to a website thatincluded the template developed by the EICC
EICC--GeSI (the “Template
Template””) for the reporting of Conflict Minerals, as well as additional guidance and training
materials related to the Rule. We also provided a Company contact to answer any questions the suppliers had regarding implementation of the Rule.
As described in our Conflict Minerals Policy, we will engage with any of our suppliers if we have reason to believe that supplier is providing the Company with
3TG that may support conflict in the Covered Countries, with the goal of establishing an alternative source of 3TG that does not support such conflict. To date,
we have found no instance where there is reason to believe our sourcing of 3TG is being used to fund armed conflict in the Covered Countries; therefore, it has
not been necessary to seek alternative sources or terminate a contract.
iv) Grievance Mechanism
P&G is committed to creating an environment that fosters open communication. The Company has well
well--established grievance mechanisms through which both
employees and suppliers can report violations of the law or Company policies. For employees, the Company maintains the Worldwide Business Conduct
Manual Helpline (the “Helpline
Helpline””), which is staffed by an independent third party and provides an anonymous way to report concerns about potential violations
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. For suppliers, the Company encourages them to report any ethical concerns or policy violations, as outlined at
http://www.pgsupplier.com/en/pg
http://www.pgsupplier.com/en/pg--values/reportvalues/report--a-concern.shtml
concern.shtml.. This reporting mechanism is operated by a third party supplier to help ensure anonymity.
To date, the Company has received no reports through either mechanism indicating any potential concerns with our Conflict Minerals Policy, our 3TG sourcing
or our Conflict Minerals Program.
v) Maintenance of Records
The Company has adopted a policy to maintain relevant documentation.
c)

Identify and Assess Risks in the Supply Chain

As previously stated, the Company has more than 300 brands and works with approximately 80,000 suppliers worldwide. Through an extensive review of our
supply chain, we determined a list of products within the scope of the Rule. We identified 232 direct suppliers for these inin--scope products, and, through asurvey of the relevant external manufacturers, determined another 13 suppliers who should be included in our survey.
The breadth and complexity of our supply chain creates a challenge in identifying all parties who are upstream from our direct suppliers. Therefore, we must
rely on our direct suppliers to provide information on the origin of the 3TG contained in components and materials supplied to us, including sources of 3TG
that are supplied to them from suppliers further upstream in the supply chain. In addition, we participate in trade and industry associations, as described above,to help further identify and assess the risks.
3. Due Diligencea) Survey Requests
The Company conducted a survey of 245 suppliers using the EICC
EICC--GeSI Template. The survey recipients represent all of the suppliers in the product categories
identified as potentially within the scope of the Rule. The Template was developed by EICC and GeSI to facilitate disclosure and communication of information
regarding a company
company’’s supply chain. The Template includes questions regarding the suppliersupplier’’s conflict
conflict--free policy, recipient
recipient’’s engagement with its direct
suppliers, and the smelters the supplier (and its suppliers) use. In addition, the Template contains questions about the origin of any 3TG provided by the
supplier, as well as the suppliersupplier’’s due diligence. Written instructions and recorded training illustrating the use of the tool is available on the EICC website.
The Template was either sent directly to suppliers by the Company, or, if a supplier chose to register through BOMCheck, which is an industry initiative for
efficient substance declaration through a web
web--based database, they were provided the opportunity to post their survey through the BOMCheck Conflict
Minerals module. The Company provided a written reminder to our mailing recipients 30 days after the Template was sent. Additional follow
follow--ups wereconducted through the Purchases representative responsible for the supplier.
b) Survey Responses
The Company received responses from the majority of the suppliers surveyed. Members of the Core Team reviewed these responses for completeness and to
determine if any potential red flags were present, in accordance with the requirements of our Conflict Minerals Program, and followed up as needed with
suppliers to clarify responses.
To date, of the 245 suppliers originally in our Survey group, 75 have responded that they do not supply 3TG to the Company. Because we broadly surveyed all
suppliers in the potentially affected product categories, this result was anticipated.
Our remaining responses included varying degrees of information regarding the names and locations of 3TG smelters used by each supplier. For those
suppliers who included smelter data, we analyzed and compared the 3TG smelters against the list of smelter facilities that have received a “conflict freefree””
designation through the Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative's ((“
“CFSI
CFSI”
”) Conflict Free Smelter Program. Those smelters who have been certified as conflict free arelisted in Attachment A. While we have seen no indication that any of our remaining suppliers are sourcing from any of the Covered Countries, we haveinsufficient data at this time to validate the status of any other smelters or refiners.
4. Our Efforts to Determine the Mine or Location of Origin with Greatest Possible Specificity
As a downstream company, we rely upon independent assessment programs to provide upstream information such as the mine or location oforigin. Consistent with the OECD Guidance, our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin of necessary Conflict Minerals in material supplied to us
with the greatest possible specificity was limited to a review of whether the smelters reported to be in our suppliers
suppliers’’ supply chain were verified as compliant
with the Conflict Free Smelter Program. CFSI has developed an audit protocol for verification of entities as compliant with the Conflict Free Smelter Program inaccordance with the OECD Guidance and in conjunction with complementary traceability schemes in the Covered Countries. The Conflict Free Smelter List iscomposed of entities that are compliant with the Conflict Free Smelter Program and that have been subject to an independent third party audit to assess
whether the entity employed policies, practices, and procedures to source conflict free minerals. We are a member of CFSI and have access to CFSI country oforigin information for entities on the Conflict Free Smelter List. CFSI has chosen to address confidential business information concerns by aggregating thecountries of origin for Conflict Minerals sourced by such entities on the Conflict Free Smelter List. CFSI requires that the independent auditor make an
examination of the countries of origin for processed Conflict Minerals as well as the location of the mine, even if the specific mine or location of origin for theseminerals within a country is not provided to CFSI members.
In 2013, our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin for Conflict Minerals in the supplied materials with the greatest possible specificity
encompassed our due diligence measures described above, including, for example, (i) surveying our suppliers using the Template; (ii) reviewing the entities
identified by our suppliers as smelters of Conflict Minerals contained in the materials supplied to us against information provided by the CFSI to identify thosesmelters that have received a conflict free designation; and (iii) reviewing available information from CFSI on the mine or location of origin of necessary Conflict
Minerals from the smelters described in clause (ii) of this paragraph. The country of origin information that we were able to obtain through these efforts is
included in Attachment A.
5. Steps to Mitigate Risk
The Company will continue to work to improve its Conflict Minerals due diligence process. To further mitigate the risk that any Confict Minerals in our
products finance or benefit armed groups, we are making the following commitments:a) As a Company, we will engage in additional supplier engagement to increase the number and quality of supplier responses;b) When we become aware or are made aware of a supplier that is not in compliance with our Conflict Minerals Policy, we will engage withthat supplier for remedy and, where necessary, find an alternative source of 3TG; andc) We will continue to invest and build relationships with relevant trade associations/industry initiatives to help improve supply chain diligence bestpractices consistent with OECD Guidance.

ATTACHMENT A
Smelters and Countries of Origin

The following facilities have been reported to us by our suppliers as part of their supply chain for Conflict Minerals and each is listed by CFSI as a smelter orrefiner. The facility names are listed as they appear on the CFSI smelter list.

Allgemeine Gold
Gold--und Silberscheideanstalt A.G.
Heimerle + Meule GmbH
Heraeus Ltd. Hong Kong
LS
LS--NIKKO Copper, Inc.
Malaysia Smelting Corporation (MSC)
Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.
MinsurMineracäo Taboca S.A.
Mitsubishi Materials CorporationOMSA
PT Bukit TimahPT Tambang TimahPT TimahTanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K.
Thaisarco
Umicore SA Business Unit Precious Metals Refining
Western Australian Mint trading as The Perth Mint
Yunnan Tin Company, Ltd.

Countries of origin of the conflict minerals these smelters process are believed to include the following countries. This information was provided through CFSI
and is aggregated for confidentiality purposes. While some countries listed below are Covered Countries, the smelters identified as sourcing from thosecountries have all been certified as conflict free by CFSI.

AngolaArgentina
Australia
Austria
BelgiumBrazilBurundiCentral African Republic
Chile
China

Djibouti
Egypt
Estonia
Ethiopia
FranceGermany
GuyanaIndia
Indonesia
Ireland

Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malaysia
Mongolia
Mozambique
Myanmar
Netherlands
Nigeria
Peru
Plurinational State of Bolivia

Colombia
Cote D
D’’Ivoire
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of Congo

IsraelJapan
Kenya
Lao People
People’’s Democratic Republic

Portugal
Republic of Congo
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation

RwandaSierra Leone
Singapore
South Africa
South Sudan
Suriname
Switzerland
Thailand
UgandaUnited Kingdom of Great Britain andNorthern Ireland
United Republic of Tanzania
United States of America
Zambia