日本英文学会 第 80 回全国大会

2008 年 5 月 25 日 （於：広島大学）

The Virginians にみる Englishness――
Englishness―― “Germanism”
Germanism”との対照との対照において対照において大阪大学大学院 市橋 孝道[発表手順]
発表手順]
I：序論－The Virginians(1857-59)について①低い評価 ②Henry Esmond とのつながり ③題材の目新しさ ④研究経緯 ⑤問題点
II：濃厚な英国描写 Part1（story と text より）①双子の主人公の関係性 ②出発点と帰着点の対照性 ③英国で“クロス”する story と text
④英国の暗部と明部
III：濃厚な英国描写 Part2（作品構成と語りより）①二人の語り手の立ち位置と視野の違い ②頻出する“home”という単語
IV：Germanism について
①概略 ②サッカレーと Germanism ③作品刊行当時のサッカレーの対 Germanism 態度
V：The Virginians にみる German Background のある人物／ドイツ人の表象①Lady Maria ②Baroness Bernstein ③George II
VI：結論－“Englishness”という言葉（ドイツ的なものとの関連から）

[資料]
資料]
①The Virginians【主な登場人物相関図】→②“CHIASMUS”～【ｶｲｱｽﾞﾏｽ】について～
交差対句法は、ギリシャ文字のカイ（χ=chi）にちな
んで名付けられた。交差対句法とは、修辞的な交差のことであり、対になった句において最初の句の統語法や意味が第二の句で逆になることを指す。（『コロンビア大学

現代文学・文化批評用語辞典』より）

Love’s fire heats water例）Love’s fire heats water, water cools not love. (Shakes., Sonnets)
water cools not love

[引用]
引用]
1. This note if I go on I feel will be very glum. The Virginians is no doubt not a success. It sadly
lacks story, and people wont care about old times, or all the trouble I take in describing them.
(Thackeray “To W. F. Synge”)
2. a) To say that his novel[The Virginians] will not rank with Mr. Thackeray’s best works is veryslight blame; to say that it will rank with those of his works which are less good is no slightpraise.

(Smith Rev. of The Virginians)1b) The Virginians, though it hardly deserves [Douglas] Jerrold’s apocryphal joke about its
superlative badness, is Thackeray’s worst major novel. (Sutherland 89)
3. Thackeray began The Virginians in May, 1857, but the idea of the novel had been much in his
mind since he wrote the preface to Esmond nearly six years before. During his two visits to theUnited States he examined with great interest the scenes of his projected narrative and was
assiduous in gathering materials for it […]. (Ray 381)
4. I [Rachel] know the fatal differences which separated them [George and Henry] in politics

never disunited their hearts; and as I can love them both, whether wearing the king’s
colours or the Republick’s, I am sure that they love me, and one another.

(HE 8)

5. While he was in Richmond, the consul there happened to be G. P. R. James, […]. According
to contemporary report, the two conversed several times over cigars, but unfortunately
what they talked about is not on record. […]perhaps now Thackeray was reminded of James’s
historical romance Henry Masterton, reprinted earlier in the decade, centering on two brothersof an antithetical temperaments who, like George and Harry Warrington of The Virginians, findthemselves on opposite sides in a revolution. (Colby 394)
6. a) On the library wall of one of the most famous writers of America, there hang two crossed
swords, which his relatives wore in the great War of Independence. The one sword was
gallantly drawn in the service of the king, the other was the weapon of a brave andhonoured republican soldier. (1)b) In disposition, they[George and Henry] were in many points exceedingly unlike; but infeature they resembled each other so closely, that but for the colour of their hair it had
been difficult to distinguish them. …Howbeit alike in form, we have said that they differedin temper. The elder was peaceful, studious, and silent; the younger was warlike and noisy.
(30)

7. a) George was a demure, studious boy, and his senses seemed to brighten up in the library,where his brother was so gloomy. […] Harry, on the other hand, was all alive in thestables or in the wood, eager for all parties of hunting and fishing […]. (32)b) […] I [George] visited my brother at his new house and plantation, I found him and his wife
at stanch Americans as we were British. (919)
8. ‘The elder brother not dead?’ says my lord[Eugene].
[William] ‘No more dead than you are. Never was. It's my belief that it was a cross between
the two.’2

‘Mr. Warrington[Henry] is incapable of such duplicity!’ cries Maria. (574, emphasis added)
9. a) There was no friendship in this cursed, cold, selfish country [Britain]. He [Henry] would
leave it. He would trust no Englishman, great or small. He would go to Germany, and makea campaign with the king; or he would go home to Virginia, bury himself in the woods there,
and hunt all day […]. (487)b) The macaronis and fine gentlemen at White's and Arthur's continued to show poor Harry
Warrington such a very cold shoulder, that he sought their society less and less…. He wasstricken down and dismayed by the fickleness and heartlessness of the world in its
treatment of him. (605-606)
10. a) And as he [George] and the Lambert ladies [Theo and Hetty] were alike strangers in
London, they partook of its pleasures together, and, no doubt, went to Vauxhall andRanelagh, to Marybone Gardens, and the play, and the Tower, and wherever else there washonest amusement to be had in those days. Martin Lambert loved that his children shouldhave all the innocent pleasure which he could procure for them, and Mr. George, who wasof a most generous, open-handed disposition, liked to treat his friends likewise […]. (610)b) With all the passion of his heart Mr. Warrington loved a play. He had never enjoyed thisamusement in Virginia, […] No wonder that he was eager to take his friends [Theo andHetty Lambert] to the theatre, and we may be sure our young countryfolks were notunwilling. Shall it be Drury Lane or Covent Garden, ladies? (610-611)
11. a) […] don't you acknowledge that the sight of an honest man [Martin Lambert], with anhonest, loving wife by his side, and surrounded by loving and obedient children, presents
something very sweet and affecting to you? (221)b) Ah, how happy we [George and Theo] were! how brisk and pleasant the winter! How snug
the kettle by the fire […] how delightful the night at the theatre, for which our friends
brought us tickets of admission […]. (837)Fig. 1
12. a) A century ago and our ancestors, the most free or the most strait-laced, met together at ascore of such merry places as that where our present scene lies, and danced and frisked, and3

gamed, and drank at Epsom, Bath, Tunbridge, Harrogate, as they do at Hombourg and
Baden now. (313)b) And so Mr. Reynolds, a most perfect and agreeable gentleman, would have painted my wife
[Theo]; but I [George] knew what his price was, and did not choose to incur that expense. I
wish I had now, for the sake of the children, that they might see what yonder face was likesome five-and-thirty years ago. (839)
13. There are few things to me more affecting in the history of the quarrel which divided the two
great nations than the recurrence of that word Home, as used by the younger towards theelder country. (7, emphasis added)
14. Now my country is England, not America or Virginia: and I[George] take, or rather took, theEnglish side of the dispute. My sympathies had always been with home, where I was now asquire and a citizen. (918, emphasis added)
15. In spite of false starts, like the short-lived cult of German plays around 1790, and theidiosyncracies of those mediating between Germany and Britain, there was an important
continuity of interest during the period between 1800 and 1850. (Ashton 25)
16. To lay down the pen, and even to think of that beautiful Rhineland makes one happy. […] Yes,
they [William Dobbin and Amelia Sedley] were very happy. They went to the Opera often ofevenings－to those snug, unassuming, dear old operas in the German towns, where thenoblesse sits and cries, and knits stockings on the one side, over against the bourgeoisie on theother. (VF 718-719)
17. a) The correspondence with [Karl Christian Phillipp] Tauchnitz, which revolved mainly about
reprints of Thackeray’s writings in their original language, also touched on translationoccasionally; notably in a letter of 7 December 1857, in which the novelist admitted that
he had empowered someone to translate The Virginians into German, but that he could
not remember who that was. (Prawer 421)b) Holding my promise may be in a condition to deprive Germany of the benefits of The

Virginians! What a queer state of things! What a loss for the German nation! (LPPS ii 834)
18. a) Goethe is a noble poet, & as interesting an old man to speak to & look upon as I ever saw,
but alas that I must say it－I believe he is little better than an old rogue－It was acharacter which I was very unwilling to give him, but it is the strict & uncomfortable truth[…]. (LPP I: 148)4b) I fancied Goethe must have been still more handsome as an old man than even in the daysof his youth. His voice was very rich and sweet. […]in truth I can fancy nothing more serene,majestic, and healthy looking than the grand old Goethe. (LPP III: 444-45)
19. What, then, happened to soften the image of Weimar between the letters written from the spotin 1830 and 1831 and the letter to Lewes written a quarter of a century later? One factor thatcounts for much here is the increasing esteem for Goethe, and for the society that sustained
him, due to Carlyle and a host of British admirers. Thackeray was always sensitive to currentsof this kind, and the acquaintance and correspondents whose views he respected－Carlyle,
Lewes, Monckton Milnes, Anna Jomeson and many more. (Prawer 409)
20. a) Maria was Will's half-sister. She and my lord were children of the late Lord Castlewood's
first wife, a German lady, whom, 'tis known, my lord married in the time of Queen Anne's
wars. Baron Bernstein, who married Maria's Aunt Beatrix, Bishop Tusher's widow, wasalso a German, a Hanoverian nobleman, […]. (159)b) ‘Ah! yes! The letters have been lost－ach, lieber Himmel!’ And Maria, as she would
sometimes do, when much moved, began to speak in the language of her mother. (367)c) [Jack] ‘[…] I mean the late lamented husband. Do you know who he [Baron Bernstein]was?’[A Baron] ‘Intimately. A more notorious villain never dealt a card. At Venice, at Brussels,
at Spa, at Vienna--the gaols of every one of which places he knew. I knew the man,my lord.’ (260, emphasis added)
21. ‘If he [George II] does not want us, we had better not come again, that is all,’ said Harry,
simply. ‘I never, somehow, considered that German fellow a real King of England.’‘Hush! For Heaven’s sake, hold your confounded colonial tongue!’ cries out my lord [Eugene].
(443)
22. ‘Englishness’ is a relatively modern invention. Dictionaries place it no earlier than 1805, its
first occurrence apparently being attributable to William Taylor of Norwich, the radical
poetaster who is credited with bringing German romanticism to the attention of a British
audience. It is pleasantly ironic that he should also have been accused by contemporaries of‘employing words and forms of construction which are not sanctioned or not current in our
language’. In this respect Taylor cheerfully admitted to his own un-Englishness, boasting toSouthey that his taste was ‘moulded on that of a foreign public’. Perhaps it was his immersion
in German that induced him to coin a word that has something of a Germanic feel about it.
(Langford 1-2)
5

Works Cited
Primary Sources
Thackeray, William Makepeace. Henry Esmond ; The English Humourists ; The Four Georges.
London: Oxford University Press, 1908. Vol. 13 of The Oxford Thackeray with Illustrations.
Ed. George Saintsbury. 17 vols. 1908. Cited as “HE”.
－－－. Vanity Fair. 1847-48. Ed. Geoffrey and Kathleen Tillotson. Boston: Houghton, 1963. Cited
as ‘VF’.
－－－. The Virginians: A Tale of the Last Century. London: Oxford University Press, 1908. Vol.
15 of The Oxford Thackeray. （このテキストからの引用はページ数のみ表記）－－－. The Letters and Private Papers of William Makepeace Thackeray. Ed. Gordon Ray. 4 vols.
London: Oxford UP, 1945-6. Cited as “LPP”.
－－－. The Letters and Private Papers of William Makepeace Thackeray: A Supplement toGordon Ray. Ed. E.F. Harden. 2vols. New York: Garland, 1994. Cited as ‘LPPS’.
－－－. Letter to W. F. Synge. December 1858. Pierpont Morgan Lib., New York. Rpt. in Thackeray
at Work. John Sutherland. London: The Athlone Press, 1974.
Secondary Sources

The German Idea: Four English Writers and the Reception of German
Thought, 1800-1860. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1980.
Carlyle, Thomas. “State of German Literature.”1827. Critical and Miscellaneous Essays.
London: Chapman and Hall, 1899. Vol. 26 of The Works of Thomas Carlyle. 30 vols.

Ashton, Rosemary.

1899-1905. 26-86.
Colby, Robert A. Thackeray's Canvass of Humanity : An Author and His Public. Columbus: Ohio
State University Press, 1979.
Colley, Linda. “Britishness and Otherness: An Argument.” Journal of British Studies.
31(4):309-29.
De Jong, Mary G. “The Way It Really Was: America’s Quarrel Over Thackeray’s The Virginians.”
Mississippi Quarterly: The Journal of Southern Culture. 38 (1984): 59-72.
Gamble, Andrew. Britain in Decline: Economic Policy, Political Strategy and the British State.
New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994.
“Germanism.” Def. 3. The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989.
Langford, Paul. Englishness Identified: Manners and Character, 1650-1850. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 2000.
Prawer, Siegbert, S. Breaches and Metaphysics: Thackeray’s German Discourse. Oxford:
European Humanities Research Centre, 1997.
Ray, Gordon, N. Thackeray: The Age of Wisdom, 1847-1863. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1958.
Smith, Goldwin. Rev. of The Virginians, by William Makepeace Thackeray. Edinburgh Review
Oct. 1859: 438-53. Rpt. in Thackeray: The Critical Heritage Ed. Geoffrey Tillotson and
Donald Hawes. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1968. 286-304.
Sorensen, Gerald C. “Some Sources for Thackeray’s The Virginians.” Review of English Studies: A
Quarterly Journal of English Literature and the English Language. 35 (1984): 208-13.
Sutherland, John. Thackeray at Work. London: The Athlone Press, 1974.
Ward, Mrs. Humphry. Introduction. Wuthering Heights. By Emily Brontë. London: John
Murrau, 1924. xi-xli.
井野瀬 久美恵 “イギリス的なるもの（Englishness）の捏造”『文化の生産 二〇世紀における諸民族文化の伝統と変容』田村 克己 編
東京：ドメス出版, 1999. 119-137.

6