INVITED REVIEW ARTICLE
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 83. 663–668, 2021
doi:10.18999/nagjms.83.4.663

Proposal for personalized treatment of early glottic cancer
with radiation therapy
Yoshiyuki Itoh and Tamami Ono
Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan

ABSTRACTThe preservation of both the organ and its function is important for the treatment of early stage glottic
cancer, and radiation therapy is an important and useful option. However, treatment with radiation therapy
alone is insufficient. Therefore, to improve the local control rate even for early stage glottic cancer,
attempts have been made to individualize treatment with radiation therapy (±chemotherapy) based on T
stage and morphological characteristics. This individualized treatment greatly improved the local control
rate for early glottic cancer. In the future, more suitable individualization can be achieved by investigating
the radiosensitivity of biomarkers using biopsy materials before radiation therapy, in addition to T stage
and morphological characteristics. Currently, many biomarkers are being investigated; however, appropriate
biomarkers for predicting local control remain unknown.
Keywords: early glottic carcinoma, radiation therapy, chemoradiotherapy, biomarkers
Abbreviations:
CA: carbonic anhydrase
COX-2: cycloxygenase-2
EpCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecule
5-FU: fluorouracil
GC: glottic cancer
LC: local control
This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

INTRODUCTION
Radiation therapy for early stage glottic cancer (GC) is regarded as one of the standard
treatments for the preservation of the organ and its function; it is the most popular treatment
method in clinical practice. Guidelines from other countries also recommend treatments aimed atpreserving the larynx as a standard treatment for early stage GC. However, in many reports,1-4
the local control (LC) rate of GC is insufficient, and the usefulness and effectiveness of radiation therapy were not demonstrable. In particular, T2 GCs have a high recurrence rate, and theReceived: March 18, 2021; accepted: April 30, 2021
Corresponding Author: Yoshiyuki Itoh, MD, PhD
Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku,
Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
Tel: +81-52-744-2328, Fax: +81-52-744-2335, E-mail: itoh@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
663

664
Yoshiyuki Itoh and Tamami Onolaryngeal preservation rate with radiation therapy alone is approximately 65%–80%, although
there are variations in reports. The usefulness of radiation therapy in preserving the organ andits functions is far from convincing.
Therefore, for a long time, attempts have been made to improve the LC rate of early stage
GC.5-15 These attempts specifically focused on combining radiation therapy with intravenous
chemotherapy and oral anticancer drugs or by increasing the fraction size of radiation (hypofractionation) depending on T stage (T1 or T2) and morphological characteristics (bulky or non-bulky
in this study) of the tumor, even in early stage GC. As a result, the LC rate has improved withthis personalized treatment.
This study outlines the history of personalized treatments by T stage and morphologicalcharacteristics that have been performed so far12,16 and aims to personalize the treatment of earlystage GC by adding the sensitivity of radiation to biomarkers.
Therefore, we propose a new treatment strategy. The usefulness of multiple biomarkers forradiosensitivity is unknown at this time, with some reports being useful and some not. We must
wait for further research results in the future.

PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND EVALUATION
T2 GC is also an early stage GC, and treatment that preserves the larynx is the first choice.
However, the control rate of T2 GC with radiation therapy alone is poor and unsatisfactory.
Therefore, to improve the control rate with radiation therapy alone, we initiated treatment withconcurrent chemoradiotherapy. The anticancer drug used in this case was a combination of lowdose cisplatin and 5-FU.5 Since this combination therapy has relatively few side effects and lessburden on the kidneys, it can be administered to older people and patients with impaired renal
function and is also indicated for patients with esophageal and lung cancers.16,17 The LC rate of
T2 with chemoradiotherapy exceeded 90%, and the laryngeal preservation rate also improved.
However, the problem was that the anti-cancer drug was administered via continuous intravenous
infusion for 24 hours, and this treatment was originally intended for patients who could betreated in outpatient clinics; thus, for hospitalized patients who wish to stay out on weekends,
the catheter remains indwelling. This increases the risk of infection at the catheter insertion site.5
Although chemoradiotherapy is a useful treatment, it cannot be reported as a treatment that canbe performed at any facility as a routine medical care. However, it can be reported that this isa treatment method for early GC that is widely applicable.
Therefore, we conducted a phase I/II clinical trial using the oral anticancer drug S-1, an
anticancer drug that can be administered to outpatients, as the chemotherapeutic agent. We
planned an administration schedule that would use S-1 as a single agent and that would havethe most sensitizing effect on radiation. To determine the recommended dose of S-1, a phase
I clinical trial was conducted with postoperative irradiation cases for head and neck cancer, 9
and then a phase II clinical trial was conducted for early GC. To date, no recurrence has been
observed in all GC cases treated with this protocol.10,14 In addition, in T2 patients with unfavorable or poor vocal cord mobility, chemoradiation was performed with high-dose cisplatin. No
recurrence was observed in patients treated with this treatment either.12 Aggressive treatment of
T2 with simultaneous chemoradiotherapy resulted in an improvement in the outcome of T1 andT2 GCs and the LC rate at Nagoya University Hospital. T1 GCs were previously treated with
70 Gy/35 fractions once,8 and a control rate exceeding 90% was not obtained. Therefore, wechanged to hypofractionation of 2.25 Gy/fraction. The LC rate of T1 GC with hypofractionation
exceeded 90% in Japan and other countries.18,19 The Tokai Study Group for Therapeutic Radiol-665
Personalized glottic cancer treatment

ogy and Oncology treated T1 GC with 2.25 Gy at 10 institutions, with 202 patients enrolled.
The median follow-up period was 34.2 months. The 2- and 4-year LC rates were 93.8% and93.1%, respectively.15 Similarly, good results were obtained in the treatment results for T1 GC
in multiple centers and with large numbers.

PERSONALIZED TREATMENT BY T STAGE AND MORPHOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS
So far, we have set a policy of individualized treatment of GC12 based on T stage and morphological characteristics, and we treated 80 patients from 2007 to 2019 according to this treatment
policy.12 The 5-year LC rate of patients who received this treatment was 97.3% (unpublisheddata). However, patients who could not follow the treatment policy owing to medical problems
such as poor renal function or simultaneous multiple cancers or old age and patients who did
not agree to the treatment policy did not have a good 5-year LC rate (75.7%, with a significant
difference [P=0.02]). Meanwhile, the 5-year LC rate of patients who received chemotherapy was
100% (unpublished data). Therefore, we believe that our personalized treatment strategy based on
T stage and morphological characteristics of tumors for early stage GC is appropriate. However,in the future, by making complete use of new biomarkers, more appropriate individualization will
be developed, with advance knowledge of radiosensitivity status. A high laryngeal preservation
rate and low recurrence rate are expected. For example, the overexpression of cycloxygenase-2(COX-2), p53, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), hypoxia inducible factor 1α subunit,
and carbonic anhydrase IX has been reported as a risk factor for a high local recurrence rate,
and a high total microvessel perimeter per tumor area was a predictor of 337 optimized radiation therapy strategies for early GC.20-23 However, in a recent systematic review, EGFR and P53
could not predict LC after radiation therapy,24 and other clusters of markers (markers involvedin angiogenesis and hypoxia, apoptosis markers, cell cycle markers, COX-2, and DNA properties) also did not provide evidence for the prediction of LC after radiation therapy. In addition,according to an ancillary study of a multi-institutional randomized phase III trial of accelerated
fractionation versus standard fractionation radiation therapy for T1-2N0M0 GC (JCOG0701), it
could not be concluded whether EpCAM, p16, and p53 were prognostic factors for early stage
GC after primary radiation therapy.25,26
The usefulness of biomarkers for radiosensitivity has not yet been concluded; thus, we must
wait for the results of future research on how to proceed. However, treatment results have
improved owing to the personalized treatment strategy based on T stage and morphologicalcharacteristics being performed at the Nagoya University Hospital.12
Here, we propose a new treatment strategy that considers biomarkers in addition to individualized treatment for T1-T2 early stage GC at Nagoya University Hospital. Fig. 1 shows the
proposed personalized treatment strategy for early stage GC.
In addition to confirming the histological diagnosis with biopsy and histology in advance, thepresence or absence of radiosensitivity is confirmed, and treatment methods were sorted basedon sensitivity. In a T1 tumor, if radiosensitivity is confirmed, irradiation with 63 Gy in 28 fractions (2.25 Gy/fraction) is recommended for radiation alone. If the tumor is not radiosensitive,
laryngeal preservation by surgery or laser therapy is recommended rather than radiation therapy.
If surgery or laser therapy is not desirable, radiation therapy in combination with anticancer drugs
should be considered. So far, no recurrence has been reported after the simultaneous treatment
with S-1 and radiation has been observed for 11 years, and it is unlikely that there were noradiation-resistant tumors among the registered cases. It is judged that the radiation therapy

666
Yoshiyuki Itoh and Tamami Ono

Fig. 1 The personalized treatment strategy proposal of radiation therapy for T1-2 glottic cancer based on
both radiosensitivity and morphological characteristics
RT: radiotherapy
Gy: grayfr: fraction
CCRT: concurrent chemoradiotherapy
CDDP: cisplatin

regimen might have overcame the radiation resistance. Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 (60 Gy in
30 fractions at 2 Gy/fraction)10,12,14 or 2.25 Gy/fraction with a total dose of 52.25 Gy/25 fractions
with short-term fractionated irradiation,13 which is currently being administered in clinical trials,
may be used. Combination therapy with short-term irradiation has a shorter treatment period andlower medical costs than the conventional irradiation alone with 70 Gy/35 fractions. For T2 GC,
2.25 or 2.4 Gy/fraction26 radiation alone is recommended, except in a bulky tumor in whichradiosensitivity is unlikely. For bulky tumors, simultaneous doses of S-1 and 2.25 Gy/fraction,and for unfavorable or poor vocal cord mobility, high doses of cisplatin and radiation (70 Gy/35
fractions) are recommended. If the tumor is radiation resistant, laryngeal preservation by surgery
may be performed, and depending on the size and spread of the tumor lesion, partial resection
may be difficult even for T2 GCs, and laryngectomy may be performed. High doses of cisplatin
and radiation (70 Gy/35 fractions) are also indicated if laryngeal preservation is strongly desired.

CONCLUSION
Individualized treatment is required to improve LC centered on radiation therapy for early stage
GC. Depending on biomarkers, tumor stage, and morphological characteristics, it is speculated that

667
Personalized glottic cancer treatmenta more appropriate individualized treatment can be achieved by determining the radiosensitivity
status. Meanwhile, further research is required.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was conducted with the cooperation of many researchers. We would like toexpress our sincere gratitude to each researcher.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare that we have no competing interests.

REFERENCES
1
2

3

4

5

6
7
8
9
10
11

12
13

14
15

16

Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Hinerman RW, Amdur RJ, Villaret DB. Management of T1-T2 glottic
carcinomas. Cancer. 2004;100:1786–1792. doi:10.1002/cncr.20181.
Mendenhall WM, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, Werning JW. Laryngeal Cancer. In: Perez and Brady’s Principles
and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 6th ed. Halperin EC, Perez CA and Brady LW Eds. Philadelphia:
Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2013:850–868.
Frata P, Cellai E, Magrini SM, et al. Radical radiotherapy for early glottic cancer: results in a series of1087 patients from two Italian radiation oncology centers. II. The case of T2N0 disease. Int J Radiat Oncol
Biol Phys. 2005;63:1387–1394. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.05.013.
Eskiizmir G, Baskın Y, Yalçın F, Ellidokuz H, Ferris RL. Risk factors for radiation failure in early-stage
glottic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2016;62:90–100. doi:10.1016/j.
oraloncology.2016.10.0131.
Itoh Y, Fuwa N. Retrospective analysis. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using protracted continuous infusion of low-dose cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for T2N0 glottic cancer. Radiat Med. 2006;24(4):277–281.
doi:10.1007/s11604-005-1517-1.
Itoh Y, Hirasawa N, Naganawa S, et al. Combined chemoradiotherapy for early glottic cancer in clinicalpractice in Japan: analysis of 10 institutions. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:5181–5184.
Hirasawa N, Itoh Y, Ishihara S, et al. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for patients with T1-T2
glottic carcinoma. a retrospective analysis. Head Neck Oncol. 2010;2:20. doi:10.1186/1758-3284-2-20.
Hirasawa N, Itoh Y, Naganawa S, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of early glottic cancer from 2000 to
2005. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:122. doi:10.1186/1748-717X-7-122.
Fujimoto Y, Kato S, Itoh Y, Naganawa S, Nakashima T. A phase I study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy
using oral S-1 for head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(1):209–213.
Kimura K, Itoh Y, Okada T, et al. Critical evaluation of a prospective study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy
with S-1 for early glottic carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(4):2385–2390.
Itoh Y, Kubota S, Kawamura M et al. A multicenter survey of stage T1 glottic cancer treated withradiotherapy delivered in 2.25-Gy fractions in clinical practice: an initial 5-year analysis. Nagoya J Med
Sci. 2016;78:399–406. doi:10.18999/nagjms.78.4.399.
Kimura K, Itoh Y, Okada T, et al. Optimized treatment strategy of radiotherapy for early glottic squamouscell carcinomas: an initial analysis. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2017;79(3):331–338. doi:10.18999/nagjms.79.3.331.
Kimura K, Itoh Y, Okada T, et al. Study protocol: prospective study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with
S-1 and hypofractionated radiotherapy for outpatients with early glottic squamous cell carcinomas. Asian
Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018;19:195–1199. doi:10.22032/APJCP.2018.19.5.1195.
Takase Y, Itoh Y, Ohtakara K, et al. Early glottic cancer treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy withonce-daily orally administered S-1. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2021;83:251–258. doi:10.18999/nagjms.83.2.251.
Oie Y, Itoh Y, Kawamura M, et al. Clinical results of T1 glottic cancer treated with radiotherapy using 2.25
Gy per fractions: a multicenter survey in clinical practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105:E366–
E367.
Itoh Y, Fuwa N, Matsumoto A, Asano A, Sasaoka M. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using protracted

668
Yoshiyuki Itoh and Tamami Ono

17
18

19
20

21
22

23

24

25
26

infusion of low dose CDDP and 5-FU and radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Nippon Acta Radiol.
1999;59:395–401.
Itoh Y, Fuwa N, Matsumoto A, Asano A, Morita K. Continuous infusion low-dose CDDP/5-FU plus radiation
in inoperable or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:230–234.
Yamazaki H, Nishiyama K, Tanaka E, Koizumi M, Chatani M. Radiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma(T1N0M0): results of prospective randomized study of radiation fraction size and overall treatment time.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;64:77–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.06.014.
Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Hinerman RW. T1-T2N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the glottic
larynx treated with radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4029–4036. doi:10.1200/JCO.2001.19.20.4029.
Cho EI, Kowalski DP, Sasaki CT, Haffty BG. Tissue microarray analysis reveals prognostic significanceof COX-2 expression for local relapse in T1-2N0 larynx cancer treated with primary radiation therapy.
Laryngoscope. 2004;114:2001–2008. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000147936.67379.e7.
Murakami N, Mori T, Yoshimoto S, et al. Expression of EpCAM and prognosis in early-stage glottic cancer
treated by radiotherapy. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:E431–E436. doi:10.1002/lary.24839.
Schrijvers ML, van der Laan BF, de Bock GH, et al. Overexpression of intrinsic hypoxia markers HIF1alphaand CA-IX predict for local recurrence in stage T1-T2 glottic laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:161–169. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.025.
Zhang S, Hayashi R, Fujii M, et al. Total microvessel perimeter per tumor area is a predictor of radiosensitivity in early-stage glottic carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:1104–1109. doi:10.1016/j.
ijrobp.2008.05.038.
Noordhuis MG, Kop EA, Bert van der Vegt, et al. Biological tumor markers associated with local control after primary radiotherapy in laryngeal cancer: a systematic review. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2020;45:486–494.
doi:10.1111/coa.13540.
Murakami N, Mori T, Machida R, et al. Prognostic value of epithelial cell adhesion molecules in T1-2N0M0
glottic cancer. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(7):1522–1527. doi:10.1002/lary.29348.
Kodaira T, Kagami Y, Shibata T, et al. Results of a multi-institutional, randomized, non-inferiority, phase
III trial of accelerated fractionation versus standard fractionation in radiation therapy for T1-2N0M0 glottic
cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG0701). Ann Oncol. 2018;29:992–997. doi:10.1093/
annonc/mdy036.