Avaya - Climate Change 2020
C0. Introduction

C0.1(C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization.
Avaya is a global leader in digital communications products, solutions and services for businesses of all sizes. We enable organizations around the globe to succeed bycreating intelligent communications experiences for customers and employees. Avaya builds open, converged and innovative solutions to enhance and simplify
communications and collaboration in the cloud, on-premises or a hybrid of both. Our global, experienced team of professionals delivers award-winning services from initialplanning and design, to seamless implementation and integration, to ongoing managed operations, optimization, training and support. As of September 30, 2019, we had apresence in approximately 175 countries worldwide and during the past four fiscal years we served more than 90% of the Fortune 100 organizations.

For more information, please visit www.avaya.com.

C0.2(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data.

Reportingyear

Start dateEnd date

Indicate if you are providing emissions data for past reportingyears

Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing emissions data
for

January 1
2019

December 31
2019

No

<Not Applicable>

C0.3

CDP

Page 1 of 54

(C0.3) Select the countries/areas for which you will be supplying data.
Argentina
Australia
Austria
BelgiumBrazilCanadaChile
China
China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Colombia
Croatia
Czechia
Denmark
FranceGermany
Hungary
India
Indonesia
IrelandIsrael
Italy
Japan
Kenya
Luxembourg
Malaysia
MexicoNetherlands
New Zealand
NorwayPeru
Philippines
PolandRepublic of Korea
Russian Federation
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
South Africa
Spain
SwedenSwitzerland
Taiwan, Greater China
ThailandTurkeyUnited Arab Emirates
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America

C0.4(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
USD

C0.5
(C0.5) Select the option that describes the reporting boundary for which climate-related impacts on your business are being reported. Note that this option shouldalign with your chosen approach for consolidating your GHG inventory.
Operational control

C1. GovernanceC1.1(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-related issues within your organization?
Yes

C1.1a

CDP

Page 2 of 54

(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) (do not include any names) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position of Please explain
individual(s)Chief
Executive
Officer(CEO)

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) is responsible for overseeing Avaya in its mission to bring about positive environmental, social, and economic change. For example, the CEO signed the “We Are
Still In” declaration, adding Avaya to the largest climate action group in the United States. The CEO publishes a “CEO Corporate Responsibility Message” externally on our Corporate Responsibility
website that highlights Avaya’s annual progress and achievements towards our: carbon emission reduction targets; environmental initiatives; and collaboration with employees, customers, partners
and suppliers to make a meaningful impact. These responsibilities lie with the CEO because climate change is an integral part of our overall business strategy and impacts our operations.

C1.1b(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Frequency with which climaterelated issues are a scheduled
agenda item

Governance mechanisms into whichclimate-related issues are integrated

Scope ofboard-level
oversight

Scheduled – some meetings

Reviewing and guiding strategy<Not
Monitoring implementation and performance of Applicable>
objectives
Monitoring and overseeing progress against
goals and targets for addressing climaterelated issues

Please explain

The Board is briefed on Avaya’s Corporate Responsibility (CR) program annually as a scheduled agenda
item. A presentation is given on Avaya’s CR framework and environmental, social, governance andcommunity initiatives.

C1.2(C1.2) Provide the highest management-level position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Name of the position(s) and/or committee(s)Reportingline

Responsibility

Coverage of
responsibility

Frequency of reporting to the board on climaterelated issues

Other C-Suite Officer, please specify (Chief Administrative
Officer and General)<Not
Applicable>

Both assessing and managing climate-related risks
and opportunities<Not Applicable>

Not reported to the board

C1.2a(C1.2a) Describe where in the organizational structure this/these position(s) and/or committees lie, what their associated responsibilities are, and how climaterelated issues are monitored (do not include the names of individuals).
Responsibility for climate-related issues lies with the Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel (CAO & GC) for Avaya, a direct report to Avaya’s CEO. Among otherthings, the CAO & GC heads the law department, which is focused on compliance and risk management and includes the Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS),
Corporate Responsibility, and Philanthropy groups. The CAO & GC has direct oversight and ultimate decision-making of our corporate-wide corporate responsibility strategy,
programs and policies, sustainability goals, and management processes. For example, our annual Corporate Responsibility Report, carbon emission reduction goals, andprogram budgets undergo review and approval by the CAO & GC.

The Vice President and Deputy General Counsel (VP & DGC) reports directly to the CAO & GC and leads a portion of the law department, which includes Avaya’s Corporate
Responsibility, Environmental Health and Safety, and Philanthropy programs. The VP & DGC manages and meets monthly with the Senior Director of EHS, Corporate
Responsibility, and Philanthropy to monitor and review climate-related programs, policies, activities, initiatives, and performance.

C1.3(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets?
Provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues
Row 1

Comment

Yes

C1.3a

CDP

Page 3 of 54

(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues (do not include the names of individuals).
Entitled to incentive

Type of Activity
Comment
incentive inventivized

Other C-Suite Officer

Monetary PleaserewardselectAnnual bonuses and performance ratings are linked to the success of Avaya’s overall business strategy and operations, which includes maintaining andachieving Avaya’s environmental commitments, goals and initiatives, including our carbon emission reduction target.

Environment/Sustainability Monetary Pleasemanager
rewardselectAnnual bonuses and performance ratings are linked to the establishment and achievement of Avaya’s environmental commitments, goals and initiatives,
including our carbon emission reduction target, efficiency measures, and supply chain compliance and engagement.

Facilities manager

Monetary PleaserewardselectAnnual bonuses and performance ratings are based on the effective and efficient management of real estate, which includes identifying energy reduction andenergy efficiency measures, tracking and reporting monthly energy, water, and waste data, and consolidating our real estate portfolio to reduce ourenvironmental footprint.

All employees

Monetary PleaserewardselectAvaya’s annual Month of Giving (MOG) is a spirited campaign designed to bring together employees, suppliers, and partners to make a difference incommunities across the globe. A component of the MOG is the Community Engagement Challenge, a friendly competition between employee-organizedcharitable activities for a chance to win donation money for their selected nonprofits. In 2019, activities included raising money and volunteering for numerous
charitable organizations, including those that are dedicated to protecting or restoring the environment. MOG winners and participants are recognized andhighlighted in internal and external communications.

Other, please specify(R&D Design forEnvironment Team)

Monetary Emissions
rewardreduction
project
Energyreduction
project

Annual bonuses and performance ratings are linked to the designing products and systems in line with the Design for Environment (DFE) program. One of the
major design objectives of the DFE program is minimizing energy consumption in new products and systems, which results in lower emissions.

C2. Risks and opportunities

C2.1(C2.1) Does your organization have a process for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities?
Yes

C2.1a
(C2.1a) How does your organization define short-, medium- and long-term time horizons?
From (years)

To (years)

Short-term

03Medium-term

3

10Long-term

10

30Comment

C2.1b
(C2.1b) How does your organization define substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Avaya considers a risk to be substantive if it has the potential to have a material legal, financial, operational, and/or reputational impact. To determine whether an identified
risk or opportunity is considered substantive, we compare its impact to Avaya’s annual revenue and other related thresholds, which include: severity of legal and compliance
ramifications (e.g. fines, penalties, lawsuits); length, extent, and degree of media coverage, the impact on our ability to successfully deliver products and services to ourcustomers; the amount of time needed to recover from reputational harm; and impact on earnings. Impacts are rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being “insignificant” (i.e. nopress exposure, no regulatory or legal action, limited or no impact on customers, no impact on earnings) and 5 being “catastrophic” (i.e. significant reputational damage,criminal penalties and fines, potential sanctions, need to restate earnings). Based on this assessment, we map high priority risks, determine ownership of the risks, and work
collaboratively to develop mitigation strategies and monitoring.

C2.2

CDP

Page 4 of 54

(C2.2) Describe your process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Annually
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-termLong-term
Description of process
Avaya uses an integrated, cross functional and company-wide risk management process to evaluate climate change risks and opportunities annually. Avaya Corporate
Responsibility works directly with the business continuity and real estate team to evaluate direct operational risks and opportunities, such as those identified in the latest
Avaya 10-K report relating to energy use, demand for low-carbon products, and regulatory compliance. Avaya Corporate Responsibility also evaluates any climate-relatedrisks and opportunities, such as access to new markets or increased diversification of business activities. Once identified, Avaya evaluates whether the risk or opportunity is
substantive based on its potential to have a material legal, financial, operational, and/or reputational impact. The detailed risk assessment is included in this CDP report,
which is then reviewed and approved by the VP & DGC. An example of a physical risk to our direct operations is reduced production capacity due to extreme weather
events. Avaya evaluates whether this risk is substantive by analyzing (1) the potential financial impact from interruptions to our business; (2) the impact on our ability tosuccessfully deliver products and services to our customers; and (3) estimated costs of losses or building damage that insurance may not cover. We also consider the
mitigation measures we have in place, such as our business continuity program, which will reduce the potential business and financial impact. An example of a transitional
opportunity for our direct operations is reducing energy costs by consolidating our real estate footprint. Avaya evaluates whether this opportunity is substantive by analyzing
the potential financial impact of reducing energy and water consumption across our global portfolio, and comparing it to key financial metrics, such as revenue, operating
expenses, and our real estate budget.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Upstream
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Annually
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-termLong-term
Description of process
Avaya uses an integrated, cross functional and company-wide risk management process to evaluate climate change risks and opportunities annually. Avaya Corporate
Responsibility works directly with the business continuity and real estate team to evaluate upstream risks and opportunities, such as those identified in the latest Avaya 10K report relating to material sourcing, material processing, and supplier activities. Once identified, Avaya evaluates whether the risk or opportunity is substantive based on
its potential to have a material legal, financial, operational, and/or reputational impact. The detailed risk assessment is included in this CDP report, which is then reviewed
and approved by the VP & DGC. An example of a physical upstream risk is supply chain disruption from extreme weather events. Avaya evaluates whether this risk is
substantive by analyzing (1) the potential financial impact from interruptions, shortages, or delays of product components; and (2) the impact on our ability to successfully
deliver products and services to our customers. We also consider the mitigation measures we have in place, such as our business continuity program and supply chain
management, which will reduce the potential business and financial impact. An example of a transitional upstream risk is failure of suppliers to comply with increased
climate change-related regulations, such as emission reduction and energy-related product design requirements. Avaya evaluates whether this risk is substantive by
analyzing the potential financial impact of (1) needing to redesign products to meet regulatory standards; (2) qualifying alternative suppliers; and (3) delays in scheduled
product deliveries to customers. We also consider the mitigation measures we have in place, such as our product manufacturing oversight, which will reduce the potential
business and financial impact.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Downstream
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Annually
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-termLong-term
Description of process
Avaya uses an integrated, cross functional and company-wide risk management process to evaluate climate change risks and opportunities annually. Avaya Corporate
Responsibility works directly with the business continuity and real estate team to evaluate downstream risks and opportunities, such as those identified in the latest Avaya
10-K report relating to technology or reputation that can impact on our customers. Once identified, Avaya evaluates whether the risk or opportunity is substantive based on
its potential to have a material legal, financial, operational, and/or reputational impact. The detailed risk assessment is included in this CDP report, which is then reviewed
and approved by the VP & DGC. An example of a downstream transitional opportunity is the shift in consumer demand towards low-carbon or energy efficient products.
Avaya evaluates whether this opportunity is substantive by analyzing the potential financial impact of (1) increased revenue for Avaya cloud-based solutions; (2) industry
growth rate projections and Avaya market share; and (3) positive reputational impacts of developing solutions that help mitigate climate change. An example of downstream
physical risk is disruption of product delivery due to extreme weather events. Avaya evaluates whether this risk is substantive by analyzing the potential financial impact
from interruptions to our business and product delivery, and the likelihood that this would happen. We also consider the mitigation measures we have in place, such as ourbusiness continuity program, which will reduce the potential business and financial impact.

CDP

Page 5 of 54

C2.2a(C2.2a) Which risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Relevance Please explain&
inclusion
Current
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related risks relating to current regulation are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. Avaya is subject to a wide range of federal, state, local, andinternational governmental requirements relating to protection of the environment, the materials content and electrical design of our products, and discharge of substances into theenvironment. Failure to comply with current regulations could lead to legal ramifications, reputational harm, and withdrawing noncompliant products in the market. As part of its business
continuity program, Avaya researches current regulations that we must comply with, including the Restriction on Hazardous Substances (RoHS), Waste Electrical and Electronic
Equipment Directive (WEEE), and Energy Labelling Directive to mitigate this risk. Following the risk assessment, Avaya updates its programs and policies accordingly to ensure they are
up to date with current regulations.

Emerging
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related risks relating to emerging regulation are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. A growing number of climate change regulations andinitiatives are either in force or pending at the local, federal, and international levels as part of a transition to a lower-carbon economy that is underway globally. Such a transition may entail
extensive policy, legal, technology and market changes to address mitigation and adaptation requirements related to climate change. Depending on the nature, speed and focus of thesechanges, transition risks may pose varying levels of financial and reputational risk to our organization. Our operations and supply chain could face increased climate change-related
regulations, modifications to transportation to meet lower emission requirements, changes to types of materials used for products and packaging to reduce emissions, increased utility
costs to address cleaner energy technologies, increased costs related to severe weather events, and emissions reductions associated with operations, business travel or products. These
costs and changes to operations could have a financial impact on our business and result in an adverse impact on our operating results or reputation.

Technology Relevant,alwaysincluded

Climate-related risks relating to technology are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. With growing awareness of climate change, the demand for lower
emissions products and services is increasing. As we continue to shift our products and services to the cloud, this creates an opportunity to serve customers' needs and requirements.
Avaya designs our products to be increasingly energy-efficient, enable reuse and recyclability, and minimize consumption of material. However, next-generation business communications
technology continues to evolve, and Avaya must keep pace to maintain or expand our market leading position. If we are not able to successfully develop and bring our new technologies tomarket in a timely manner, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we may need to invest more in research and development toensure our products and services are innovative and competitive in the market.

Legal

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related legal risks are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. There is heightened awareness of the negative impacts of climate change and thenumber of climate-related litigation claims is increasing. Avaya could face legal risks if we fail to comply with environmental laws, responsibly source materials in our supply chain, or
sufficiently disclose our material financial risks. For example, one of the legal requirements in the electronics industry is the disclosure of the use of conflict minerals and its origins. If Avaya
failed to comply with laws, it could impact our company financially through increased costs and reduced demand for our products and services resulting from fines and judgments.

MarketRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related market risks are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. The business communications market in which we operate is characterized by
rapid, and sometimes disruptive, technological developments, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and enhancements, changes in customer requirements anda limited ability to accurately forecast future customer orders. As the market continues to evolve and technology continues to develop rapidly, we may face competition in the future fromcompanies that do not currently compete against us. To effectively compete and maintain or expand our market leading position, we may need to make additional investments in ourbusiness, use more capital resources than our business currently requires or reduce prices, any of which may materially and adversely affect our profitability. However, there could be an
opportunity for us in the market if the demand continues to increase for products and services that that are energy-efficient and lower emissions. We recently introduced a significant
number of new product offerings and are increasingly focused on new, high value software products that reduce the cost of ownership as a revenue driver.

Reputation Relevant,alwaysincluded

Climate-related risks relating to our reputation are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. Companies are being held to higher standards and are expectedto act on climate change. Avaya’s customers regularly request information on our corporate responsibility and sustainability initiatives through questionnaires. Avaya reports its carbon
emissions annually to CDP and GRI. In addition, Avaya publishes an annual corporate responsibility report that is publicly available on our website. If Avaya refused to report climaterelated information or failed to implement sustainability initiatives, we could experience reputational harm from our customers and community. This could lead to a decrease in revenue andlower demand for our products and services.

AcutephysicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related acute physical risks are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. With facilities around the world, Avaya is vulnerable to severe weather
events including storms, floods, tornados, and hurricanes. Acute physical risks could lead to higher capital costs from direct damage to our assets or supply chain disruption. As part of its
business continuity program, Avaya identifies, assesses, and manages acute physical risks on an annual basis to ensure resilience of our existing real estate assets and those being
considered. Climate-related chronic physical risks are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. Avaya is subject to chronic physical risks related to longerterm shifts in climate patterns. Avaya’s financial performance may be impacted by changes in water availability, sourcing, and quality due to the impacts of climate change. Extremechanges could impact many facets of our business, including our facilities, operations, supply chain, transportation, and employee health and safety. Sea level rise and chronic flooding
creates a risk for Avaya and its suppliers’ assets. Chronic physical risks are more difficult to analyze and involve many variables, but they are included in the Avaya Corporate
Responsibility team’s annual climate-related risk assessment.

Chronic
physicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Climate-related chronic physical risks are evaluated annually as a part of Avaya’s company-wide risk assessment. Avaya is subject to chronic physical risks related to longer-term shifts inclimate patterns. Avaya’s financial performance may be impacted by changes in water availability, sourcing, and quality due to the impacts of climate change. Extreme changes could
impact many facets of our business, including our facilities, operations, supply chain, transportation, and employee health and safety. Sea level rise and chronic flooding creates a risk for
Avaya and its suppliers’ assets. Chronic physical risks are more difficult to analyze and involve many variables, but they are included in the Avaya Corporate Responsibility team’s annual
climate-related risk assessment.

C2.3(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.3a
(C2.3a) Provide details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Risk 1
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Legal

Exposure to litigation

Primary potential financial impact
Increased direct costs
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 6 of 54

Company-specific description
Avaya is subject to various requirements relating to the operating characteristics of our products. For example, all Avaya-designed and Avaya-branded ODM and OEM
external power supplies (ESPs) used in office and domestic applications need to comply with the European framework directive for the Eco-design of Energy using Products(EuP) Lot 7. If we violate or fail to comply with these requirements, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators, lose customers and damage our reputation,
which could have an adverse effect on our business.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Unlikely
Magnitude of impact
Medium-high
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
37650000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Failure to comply with applicable environmental regulations would lead to penalties and fines enacted by authorities. For example, if Avaya contravened or failed to comply
with the prohibition on hazardous substances in the RoHS Regulations, we could receive an enforcement notice requiring non-compliant goods to be withdrawn from themarket. In FY19, EMEA sales accounted for 26% of our GAAP revenue, or approximately $753 million. If Avaya’s EMEA revenue decreased by 5% due to the withdrawal ofnoncompliant products, it could lead to a loss of up to $37.65 million. In addition, we could face a fine up to the statutory maximum (currently £5000) on summary conviction
or an unlimited fine on conviction on indictment.
Cost of response to risk
0
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Avaya’s Design for Environment (DfE) program ensures that our products are compliant with mandatory requirements in the countries where Avaya markets its products.
For example, Avaya’s DfE program ensures compliance with EU EuP Lot 7 directive, EU and China RoHS, and EU REACH requirements by tracking product energy
efficiency-related and product labeling regulations and standards and actively monitoring proposed legislation in countries where we have operations and sales. Avaya’s
Design for Environment program is a core part of our business; therefore, we do not consider it to incur an additional cost of management.
Comment
Identifier
Risk 2
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Acute physical

Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events such as cyclones and floods

Primary potential financial impact
Decreased revenues due to reduced production capacity
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
Our worldwide operations, and those of our contract manufacturers and outsourced service providers, are vulnerable to interruption by extreme weather events. For
instance, our corporate headquarter office in the San Francisco Bay Area of California is vulnerable to damage from flooding and possible sea level rise. If any disasterwere to occur, our ability and the ability of our contract manufacturers and outsourced service providers to operate could be seriously impaired and we could experiencematerial harm to our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, the coverage or limits of our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient tocompensate for any losses or damages that may occur.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
More likely than not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
6500000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
CDP

Page 7 of 54

Explanation of financial impact figure
If one of Avaya’s facilities was located in an area impacted by an extreme weather event, there is a potential for physical damage to the building. For example, if Avaya’s
headquarters in Santa Clara was impacted by flooding or severe weather, the financial impact would be less than $6.5 million based on the value of the building contents.
Avaya’s business continuity team assesses the real estate asset values of its portfolio against current market rates to calculate the risk.
Cost of response to risk
0
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Avaya Corporate Security and Business Continuity has developed location-based risk assessments for facilities over 50 people that cover physical risks, which includes
extreme weather and natural disasters. Based on the risk assessments, the Corporate Security and Business Continuity team develops management plans that arecomprehensive in scope; for example, if a severe weather event occurs in one location, other facilities can provide ongoing support and/or production. In addition, eachAvaya location has an Emergency Preparedness Plan which helps ensure the safety of our employees and minimize damage in the event of an emergency or natural
disaster. The Corporate Security and Business Continuity team evaluates these risks annually and updates the risk assessments and management plans accordingly. The
Avaya Corporate Security and Business Continuity program is a core part of our business; therefore, we do not consider it to incur an additional cost of management.
Comment
Identifier
Risk 3
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Downstream
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Reputation

Increased stakeholder concern or negative stakeholder feedback

Primary potential financial impact
Decreased revenues due to reduced demand for products and services
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
Avaya is experiencing increasing demand from stakeholders – such as customers, investors, stakeholders, and the public – for companies to address climate change andimplement measures to collectively reduce our environmental impact. Failure to take action, demonstrate leadership, or comply with climate change developments canimpact the Avaya brand and reputation. For example, Greenpeace’s annual “Click Green” report puts public pressure on major internet and technology companies to adopt
sustainable practices. Companies that fail to take action or be transparent about their energy use receive poor grades and are vulnerable to reputational harm.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Unlikely
Magnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
28870000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
If Avaya ‘s reputation was negatively impacted due to lack of lack of commitment or action towards water-related issues, it could impact our relationship with our customers
and therefore our revenue. In a hypothetical scenario, we analyze how a 1% decrease in our revenue would impact our business. Avaya’s FY19 revenue was $2.887
billion; if our revenue decreased by 1% due to reputational harm, it would result in a loss of $28,870,000.
Cost of response to risk
204000000
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Avaya demonstrates proactive management of its climate change impacts by developing innovative, energy efficient products such as the ENERGY STAR certified J179,
J169 and J129 VoIP phones and utilizing our own products such as Avaya Equinox to reduce the need for travel. In FY19, Avaya invested $204 million in R&D, which
accounted for 16.7% of our product revenue. Our investments in FY19 were primarily focused on driving innovative cloud solutions that allow Avaya and our customers toincrease efficiency while reducing our environmental footprint. In addition, Avaya takes action on climate change by participating in CDP and implementing a carbon
emission reduction goal, participating in corporate responsibility and environmental conferences that address solutions to climate change; and promoting the environmental
benefits of Avaya solutions to current and potential customers.
Comment

C2.4(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

CDP

Page 8 of 54

C2.4a(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Shift in consumer preferences
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific description
Avaya is a business-to-business company and our customers are setting higher standards and expectations for companies they would like to do business with specific to asustainability value proposition. Avaya receives and responds to customer questionnaires on an ongoing basis, which request information on sustainability, EHS, andbusiness ethics practices. Avaya’s customers also request us to report our carbon emissions annually to CDP. In terms of our products and service offerings, ourcustomers are looking for solutions that not only streamline their business operations and enhance collaboration, but those that are increasingly energy efficient and reduce
the total cost of ownership (i.e. hardware, facilities, and utilities).
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
More likely than not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
2970000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
In FY19, revenue for Avaya’s Enterprise Cloud and Managed Services was $297 million. In a hypothetical scenario, if Avaya was able to increase our cloud-based revenue
by 1% because of higher demand for low-emissions products and services, it would result in $2,970,000 of additional revenue.
Cost to realize opportunity
204000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Avaya offers a robust portfolio of cloud-based contact center and unified communications, which include solutions that take collaboration beyond dedicated videoconferencing rooms to desktops and mobile devices that employees use every day. In FY19, Avaya invested $204 million in R&D, which supports driving innovative cloudbased solutions across our portfolio. By migrating to the cloud, customers can lower their total cost of ownership with no infrastructure expense and minimal operating costs.
This provides an advantage over our competitors because we give our customers solutions that increase productivity and save costs, while giving them the opportunity to
reduce their energy and carbon footprint.
Comment
Identifier
Opp2
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Direct operations
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development and/or expansion of low emission goods and services
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific description
With growing awareness of climate change, increasing regulations, and more extreme weather events, the demand for lower emissions products and services is increasing.
As Avaya continues to shift its products and services to the cloud, this creates an opportunity for increased revenue to meet this demand. Avaya made significant progresspositioning the company for future growth and accelerating our relevance in cloud during fiscal 2019. Notably, we grew our public cloud seats by approximately 160% year
over year; we launched ReadyNow, an enterprise-class private cloud solution, and have already booked $90 million of total contract value; we announced a Microsoft
partnership to bring our next generation CCaaS to market on Azure; and we recently closed our strategic partnership for UCaaS with RingCentral. Additionally, the Avaya
OneCloud platform was named a 2019 Communications Solutions Products of the Year Award. The investments across our portfolio, especially in contact center, cloud,services and AI, have materially strengthened our position and solidified our platform for future growth. Although we cannot fully correlate the increased revenue to demand
CDP

Page 9 of 54

for low emission products and services, the environmental benefits do enhance our cloud-based and software solutions and make them more attractive to our customers.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
More likely than not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
2970000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
In FY19, revenue for Avaya’s Enterprise Cloud and Managed Services was $297 million. In a hypothetical scenario, if Avaya was able to increase our cloud-based revenue
by 1% because of higher demand for low-emissions products and services, it would result in $2,970,000 of additional revenue.
Cost to realize opportunity
204000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Avaya aims to design and develop products that help our customers reduce their environmental impact through its Design for Environment (DfE) program. We hold an ISO
14001 certification for our DfE program which demonstrates our commitment to continually reduce the environmental impact of our products. In FY19, Avaya invested $204
million in R&D, which supports the development of leading-edge unified communications and contact center products and solutions. Avaya will continue to provide low
emission products and services, creating an opportunity to increase revenue as demand for these products increases.
Comment
Identifier
Opp3
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Direct operations
Opportunity type
Resource efficiency
Primary climate-related opportunity driverMove to more efficient buildings
Primary potential financial impact
Reduced indirect (operating) costs
Company-specific description
Moving to more efficient buildings can help Avaya reduce our energy consumption, real estate costs, and carbon emissions. For example, Avaya is focused on using ourreal estate assets efficiently by ensuring our facilities are suitable according to the number of employees and nature of work at each location and making consolidations,where possible. In addition, Avaya is implementing energy efficiency projects such as installing LED lighting and upgrading to modular uninterruptable power supply (UPS)
systems to make our facilities more efficient and reduce operating costs.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, a single figure estimate
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
1200000
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)<Not Applicable>
Explanation of financial impact figure
Avaya employs strategies to use its real estate assets more efficiently by consolidating laboratories and reducing its square footage, where possible. This results indecreased energy usage and cost savings. For example, Avaya reduced its annual facilities energy costs (electricity, diesel, and natural gas) by approximately $1.2 million,or 13%, from 2018 to 2019 across its global real estate portfolio.
Cost to realize opportunity
5000000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
The Avaya EHS and Corporate Responsibility Team regularly meets with the Avaya Real Estate Team to review and discuss building management improvement

CDP

Page 10 of 54

opportunities including minimizing waste, water, and energy consumption. In addition, Avaya employs strategies to use its real estate assets more efficiently by
consolidating laboratories, reducing its square footage, and relocating to more efficient spaces, where possible. Avaya considers the cost to realize efficiencies in our realestate footprint to be the Rough Order of Magnitude real estate budget, which was less than $5 million in 2019.
Comment

C3. Business Strategy

C3.1(C3.1) Have climate-related risks and opportunities influenced your organization’s strategy and/or financial planning?
Yes

C3.1a
(C3.1a) Does your organization use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its strategy?
No, but we anticipate using qualitative and/or quantitative analysis in the next two years

C3.1c(C3.1c) Why does your organization not use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its strategy?
Avaya is spending time researching and understanding the different types of climate-related scenarios, methodologies, and assumptions. Although we were unable tocomplete an in-depth analysis this year, we are preparing to conduct one in the next two years and will use it to inform our strategy.

C3.1d(C3.1d) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your strategy.
Have climate- Description of influence
related risks
andopportunities
influenced
your strategy
in this area?
Products
andservices

Yes

Growing awareness of climate change and customer demand for energy efficient and low-carbon products influences Avaya’s development of new product and services offerings.
Avaya is focused on delivering best-in-class products and services that are innovative, flexible, and enable enhanced collaboration, but also those that help our customers reduce theirenvironmental impact. We are shifting away from hardware and developing more software and cloud-based solutions; coupled with savings in money, time and services, cloudarchitecture represents an important way Avaya can help its customers implement more sustainable business practices in the face of climate change. In addition, Avaya is designing its
products to be increasingly energy efficient to meet customer demand and energy standards; currently our J179, J169, and J129 VoIP phones are ENERGY STAR certified products
and there are more products in progress towards achieving the certification. The impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on our products and services is high due to the R&D
investment needed to develop these technologies; for example, Avaya invested $204 million in R&D in FY19.

Supplychain
and/or
value
chain

Yes

Avaya’s customers and the public are setting higher expectations for supply chain responsibility and holding companies accountable for their suppliers. The electronics industry has
faced public scrutiny for engaging in business with suppliers who violate environmental, labor, and/or ethics laws. Avaya holds itself to high environmental, social, and ethical standards,
and proactively works to ensure these standards are implemented down our supply chain. Avaya is a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), a coalition of companies
dedicated to supply chain responsibility in the electronics industry and has adopted the RBA Code of Conduct in full. Before engaging in business with a direct Tier 1 supplier, we requirethem to agree to adopt the RBA Code of Conduct as part of their contract. In addition to supply chain standards, Avaya considers multiple vendors and supplier geographical distribution
to reduce risk and potential costs, so the magnitude of impact of climate-related risks and opportunities on our supply chain is low.

Investment Yes
in R&D

Investing in R&D is critical for Avaya in order for us to continue delivering innovative and efficient products that delight our customers and maintain our leading position in the softwareand services market. Over the past three fiscal years, we have invested over $800 million in R&D, including technology acquisitions. Avaya is shifting its R&D focus areas to cloudbased solutions across our portfolio, which offer both economic and environmental benefits to our customers. A significant amount of Avaya’s R&D activities is conducted in countries
outside of the U.S.; the productivity and success of our R&D could be impacted by increased legal and regulatory constraints, natural disasters or extreme weather events, andeconomic conditions. As indicated above, the risk to our R&D supply chain is low as Avaya considers multiple vendors and supplier geographical distribution. However, the impact ofclimate-related opportunities on R&D is high as we shift our investments towards innovate software and services offerings, which offer inherent environmental benefits to our customers,
and away from hardware-based business communications.

Operations Yes

Over the last few years, Avaya has focused on consolidating its facilities and streamlining its operations in order to save costs and increase efficiencies. Streamlining our operations has
also led to significant energy reductions and increased opportunity for energy efficiency projects as we move into new buildings that are more suited for the number of employees andnature of the work. The impact of climate-related opportunities on our operations is medium-low due to the costs savings we have realized from consolidating our real estate footprint; forexample, Avaya reduced its annual facilities energy costs (electricity, natural gas, and diesel) by approximately $1.2 million, or 13%, from 2018 to 2019.

C3.1e

CDP

Page 11 of 54

(C3.1e) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your financial planning.
Financial
Description of influenceplanning
elements
that havebeen
influenced
Row Indirect
Our operating costs have been positively impacted by realizing an opportunity around resource efficiency. Avaya employs strategies to use its real estate assets more efficiently by consolidating1
costs
laboratories and reducing its square footage, where possible. As a result, Avaya reduced its annual facilities energy costs (electricity, natural gas, and diesel) by approximately $1.2 million fromAcquisitions 2018 to 2019. In addition, Avaya implements energy efficiency projects to further reduce energy and operating costs. We expect our operating costs to continue to be influenced by climateand
related risks and opportunities on the medium-term time horizon (3-10 years). Avaya’s strategic operating plan requires continued investments in acquisitions and strategic alliances with otherdivestments companies in various areas, including, without limitation, accelerating the development, sales and delivery of our cloud-based solutions and services. For example, Avaya acquired Spoken, aprivate technology company that provides cloud-native, multi-tenant architecture-based CCaaS solutions. Additionally, Avaya formed a strategic partnership with RingCentral to develop Avaya
Cloud Office in 2019. Avaya cloud-based solutions meet customer demand to increase productivity and save costs while minimizing their carbon footprint. In addition, they lower the total cost ofownership by reducing hardware, power and space requirements, which will help our customers avoid carbon emissions.

C3.1f(C3.1f) Provide any additional information on how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your strategy and financial planning (optional).

C4. Targets and performance

C4.1(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was active in the reporting year?
Absolute target

C4.1a(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Target reference number
Abs 1Year target was set
2015
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s) (or Scope 3 category)
Scope 1+2 (location-based)
Base year
2014
Covered emissions in base year (metric tons CO2e)
105570Covered emissions in base year as % of total base year emissions in selected Scope(s) (or Scope 3 category)98
Target year
2020
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
15
Covered emissions in target year (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
89734.5
Covered emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)36756% of target achieved [auto-calculated]
434.555271383916
Target status in reporting year
Achieved
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, we consider this a science-based target, but this target has not been approved as science-based by the Science-Based Targets initiative
Please explain (including target coverage)
Avaya has adopted the "3% Solution" target developed by the WWF and CDP, therefore targeting a 3% absolute reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions each year fora total 15% reduction by 2020. Fugitive emissions and sites smaller than 400 sq. ft. are excluded from our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions and target because they are

CDP

Page 12 of 54

negligible, only accounting for 2% of these emissions; therefore, our target covers 98% of our total, gross global Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.
Target reference number
Abs 2Year target was set
2015
Target coverage
Company-wide
Scope(s) (or Scope 3 category)
Other, please specify (Scope 3 (All Categories))
Base year
2014
Covered emissions in base year (metric tons CO2e)
839264
Covered emissions in base year as % of total base year emissions in selected Scope(s) (or Scope 3 category)100
Target year
2020
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
0.05
Covered emissions in target year (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
838844.368
Covered emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
816626% of target achieved [auto-calculated]
5394.72680825104
Target status in reporting year
Achieved
Is this a science-based target?
No, but we are reporting another target that is science-based
Please explain (including target coverage)
Avaya set a target to achieve a year-over-year absolute reduction in its total Scope 3 emissions, or a minimum of 0.01%. per year

C4.2
(C4.2) Did you have any other climate-related targets that were active in the reporting year?
No other climate-related targets

C4.3(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year? Note that this can include those in the planning and/or
implementation phases.
Yes

C4.3a
(C4.3a) Identify the total number of initiatives at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings.
Number of initiatives

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e (only for rows marked *)Under investigation0

0

To be implemented*

6338

Implementation commenced*

00

Implemented*

4

9732

Not to be implemented

0

0

C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Initiative category & Initiative type
CDP

Page 13 of 54

Company policy or behavioral change

Site consolidation/closure

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)161
Scope(s)Scope 1
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
21490
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
5000000
Payback period>25 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
In collaboration with the Real Estate and Facility Management Team, Avaya is exploring ways to reduce energy costs and its overall footprint. Buildings are being evaluatedfor their type of use (e.g., warehouse, R&D, office space) and total occupancy to optimize building efficiency. Through voluntary building consolidation efforts, Avaya is
reducing its leased square footage and consolidating lab spaces, which results in reductions of diesel and natural gas consumption and cost. Avaya facilities reduced
Scope 1 emissions from diesel fuel use (125 metric tons CO2e) and natural gas use (36 metric tons CO2e) from 2018-2019, for a total of 161 metric tons CO2e. From
reduced diesel and natural gas consumption, we realized nearly $22,000 in savings. The Rough Order of Magnitude budget for total FY19 real estate closures,consolidations and relocations was less than $5 million.
Initiative category & Initiative typeCompany policy or behavioral change

Site consolidation/closure

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
8615
Scope(s)Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
1150000
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
5000000
Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
3-5 years
Comment
In collaboration with the Real Estate and Facility Management Team, Avaya is exploring ways to reduce energy costs and its overall footprint. Buildings are being evaluatedfor their type of use (e.g., warehouse, R&D, office space) and total occupancy to optimize building efficiency. Through voluntary building consolidation efforts, Avaya is
reducing its leased square footage and consolidating lab spaces, which results in reductions of electricity consumption and cost. Avaya facilities reduced carbon emissions
associated from purchased and estimated electricity by 8,841 metric tons CO2e from 2018-2019; 8,615 mtCO2e in reductions were due to minimizing our real estate
footprint and 226 mtCO2e in reductions was due to the UPS in Bangalore. From reduced electricity consumption, we realized $1.15 million in savings. The Rough Order ofMagnitude budget for total FY19 real estate closures, consolidations and relocations was less than $5 million.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Other, please specify (Uninterruptable power supply)

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
226
Scope(s)Scope 2 (location-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
39987
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
55000
Payback period
CDP

Page 14 of 54

1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
11-15 years
Comment
The Avaya Bangalore office was using conventional type uninterrupted power supply (UPS) systems that had an efficiency of 80% at full load condition. These were
replaced with modular UPS systems with an efficiency of 96.5% at full load condition. By upgrading to modular UPS systems, the Bangalore office is expected to realize
energy savings of 1,517,544 kWh over a 5-year warranty period, or approximately 303,508 kWh per year. This annual energy savings was multiplied by the U.S. national
weighted average CO2 marginal emission rate of 7.44 x 10-4 metric tons CO2/kWh to calculate the avoided emissions, 226 mtCO2e.
Initiative category & Initiative typeCompany policy or behavioral change

Other, please specify (Employee travel policy)

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)730
Scope(s)Scope 3
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
800000Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
0Payback period
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Avaya maintains and implements a strict travel policy in order to reduce our carbon emissions. We encourage utilizing our own video and web conferencing technologies,
which enable participants to interact as if they are all in the same room, in lieu of traveling for business meeting. From 2018 to 2019, we reduced our air travel by over 2.7
million miles and our rental car travel by nearly 315,000 miles. By reducing Avaya business travel (air + rental cars), we reduced our Scope 3 carbon emissions by 730
mtCO2e. Our air travel costs decreased by approximately $800,000, yielding cost savings for the company. There is no additional cost resulting from the travel policy or theutilization of our own technologies.

C4.3c(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?
MethodComment

Compliance with regulatory
requirements/standards

As regulations expand around the world, they provide an effective driver to internal investments and decisions regarding emission reductions and efficiency measures.

Financial optimization calculations

Key strategies to reduce our emissions include (1) evaluating our real estate assets for building optimization and (2) optimizing the use of Avaya technology to reducebusiness air travel costs.

C4.5(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods and/or services as low-carbon products or do they enable a third party to avoid GHG emissions?
Yes

C4.5a

CDP

Page 15 of 54

(C4.5a) Provide details of your products and/or services that you classify as low-carbon products or that enable a third party to avoid GHG emissions.
Level of aggregation
Company-wide
Description of product/Group of products
As a global leader in delivering superior communications experiences, Avaya provides the most complete portfolio of software and services for multi-touch contact centerand unified communications offered on premises, in the cloud, or a hybrid. Avaya’s software and services reduces the need for hardware, increases efficiency, and lowers
the total cost of ownership, which in turn avoids carbon emissions. In addition, Avaya’s collaboration technology, such as Avaya Aura® and Avaya Equinox, can beleveraged to reduce travel emissions by migrating meetings from the physical to the digital realm. Both Avaya and its customers harness our solutions in order to avoid
emissions and reduce our environmental impact.
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they enable avoided emissions?
Avoided emissions
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate avoided emissions
Evaluating the carbon-reducing impacts of ICT% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the reporting year
83.8
% of total portfolio value<Not Applicable>
Asset classes/ product types<Not Applicable>
Comment
Software and services accounted for over 83.8% of FY19 GAAP revenue, which Avaya considers to enable avoided emissions since our software and services reduce theneed for hardware, business travel, and physical infrastructure.
Level of aggregation
Group of products
Description of product/Group of products
As part of our strategic business plan, Avaya has invested in R&D to develop new and improved technologies that reduce electricity consumption, as well as server
virtualization that saves electricity and physical space. Avaya is focused on designing increasingly energy efficient products through its Design for Environment (DfE)
program; currently our J179, J169 and J129 VoIP phones are ENERGY STAR certified products listed on the ENERGY STAR website. These products reduce energy
consumption, increase efficiency, and avoid carbon emissions.
Are these low-carbon product(s) or do they enable avoided emissions?
Avoided emissions
Taxonomy, project or methodology used to classify product(s) as low-carbon or to calculate avoided emissions
Evaluating the carbon-reducing impacts of ICT% revenue from low carbon product(s) in the reporting year
3.7
% of total portfolio value<Not Applicable>
Asset classes/ product types<Not Applicable>
Comment
Revenue for the J100-series phones accounted for 3.7% of Avaya’s FY19 revenue of $2.887 billion.

C5. Emissions methodology

C5.1

CDP

Page 16 of 54

(C5.1) Provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2).
Scope 1
Base year start
January 1 2014
Base year end
December 31 2014
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
21818
Comment
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start
January 1 2014
Base year end
December 31 2014
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
83752
Comment
Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C5.2(C5.2) Select the name of the standard, protocol, or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate emissions.
IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2006
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)

C6. Emissions data

C6.1
(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
5300
Start date
<Not Applicable>
End date<Not Applicable>
Comment

C6.2(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
Row 1​Scope 2, location-based​
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Scope 2, market-based
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Comment

C6.3
CDP

Page 17 of 54

(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Scope 2, location-based
31456
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
33685
Start date
<Not Applicable>
End date<Not Applicable>
Comment

C6.4(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions that are within your selected reporting
boundary which are not included in your disclosure?
Yes

C6.4a
(C6.4a) Provide details of the sources of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions that are within your selected reporting boundary which are not included in yourdisclosure.
SourceFugitive emissions
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
No emissions from this source
Relevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are relevant and calculated, but not disclosed
Relevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are relevant and calculated, but not disclosed
Explain why this source is excluded
Fugitive emissions were calculated and estimated to be approximately 2% of our Scope 2 emissions. Because of their minimal impact on our Scope 2 footprint, they are notincluded in our disclosure.
SourceFacilities smaller than 400 square feet
Relevance of Scope 1 emissions from this source
Emissions are not evaluatedRelevance of location-based Scope 2 emissions from this source
Emissions are not evaluatedRelevance of market-based Scope 2 emissions from this source (if applicable)
Emissions are not evaluated
Explain why this source is excluded
Avaya does not include facilities less than 400 square feet in its Scope 1 or Scope 2 emissions. These sites comprise approximately 0.2% of our real estate footprint andcan include storage space, so their impact on our carbon footprint is deemed to be negligible.

C6.5(C6.5) Account for your organization’s gross global Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.

CDP

Page 18 of 54

Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
106883Emissions calculation methodology
Environmentally extended Input-output (IO) analysis is a methodology used in environmental accounting which reflects the link between economic consumption activities
and environmental impact. Avaya worked with an external consultant to analyze 2017 spend data for purchased goods and services, capital goods, and upstream leased
assets and categorize these activities into their respective IO spend categories applying emission factors developed by the Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon
University (2002 US Benchmark Version of the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) Model). http://www.eiolca.net/cgi-bin/dft/use.pl (last accessed
March 18th, 2015.) Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for purchased goods and services calculated in 2017 was used for2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Used internal spend data; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
164128Emissions calculation methodology
Environmentally extended Input-output (IO) analysis is a methodology used in environmental accounting which reflects the link between economic consumption activities
and environmental impact. Avaya worked with an external consultant to analyze 2017 spend data for purchased goods and services, capital goods, and upstream leased
assets and categorize these activities into their respective IO spend categories applying emission factors developed by the Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon
University (2002 US Benchmark Version of the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) Model). http://www.eiolca.net/cgi-bin/dft/use.pl (last accessed
March 18th, 2015.) Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for capital goods calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Used internal spend data; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.
Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
13168
Emissions calculation methodology
Upstream emissions associated with fuel and energy consumed by Avaya-operated facilities and vehicles include emissions associated with fuel extraction and delivery,
and with the generation of energy that is lost during the distribution of energy over physical energy infrastructure. Emissions were calculated using emissions factors
published by the UK Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. Global warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report. Because there
were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for capital goods calculated in 2018 was used for 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Used fuel and energy data from utility bills and third-party logistics partners.
Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
10534
Emissions calculation methodology
Upstream emissions associated with transportation and distribution of products and product inputs were calculated using records provided by third party logistics partners.
The distance and weight of shipments were multiplied by emissions factors sourced from the EPA. Global warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5thAssessment Report. Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for upstream transportation and distribution calculated in 2017 wasused for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Used data provided by third-party logistics partners.

CDP

Page 19 of 54

Waste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e605
Emissions calculation methodology
Emissions factors for the transportation of waste generated at Avaya facilities to waste processing plants were derived from EPA WARM factors, and only include emissions
associated with transportation of waste. Global warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report. Because there were no significant changes inthe business, the metric tons CO2e for waste generated in operations calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Used internal data on waste generated in operations.
Business travel
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
6345
Emissions calculation methodology
Business Travel includes short, medium and long-haul flights. Avaya receives detailed data, including departure and arrival locations, total miles and frequency of trips fromits third-party travel partner. Avaya applies DEFRA (2017) emission factors and calculates the associated emissions from business travel using its energy and carbon
software management tool. Also included in this footprint are emissions from rental cars; the total CO2 value is provided by our travel vendor.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Used data provided by third-party travel partner.
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
16265
Emissions calculation methodology
Emissions were calculated applying average commuting mode, distance and speed, on a per-country basis, to the number of employees working at Avaya facilities in 2017.
This was then multiplied by the appropriate emission factors, based on the mode of transportation, which were sourced from the EPA Emissions Factor Hub. Global
warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report. Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for employee
commuting calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Utilized internal data on headcount and office locations; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.
Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
25943
Emissions calculation methodology
Environmentally extended Input-output (IO) analysis is a methodology used in environmental accounting which reflects the link between economic consumption activities
and environmental impact. Avaya worked with an external consultant to analyze 2017 spend data for purchased goods and services, capital goods, and upstream leased
assets and categorize these activities into their respective IO spend categories applying emission factors developed by the Green Design Institute, Carnegie Mellon
University (2002 US Benchmark Version of the Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) Model). http://www.eiolca.net/cgi-bin/dft/use.pl last accessed
March 18th, 2015.) Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for upstream leased assets calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Used internal spend data; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.

CDP

Page 20 of 54

Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
26299
Emissions calculation methodology
Downstream emissions associated with transportation and distribution of products and product inputs were calculated using records provided by 3rd party logistics partners.
The distance and weight of shipments were multiplied by emissions factors sourced from the EPA. Global warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5thAssessment Report. Because there were no significant changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for downstream transportation and distribution calculated in 2017
was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Used data from third-party logistics partners.
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Avaya determined this category to represent less than 0.1% of Scope 3 emissions.
Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e446388Emissions calculation methodology
Avaya identified the total number of units sold for each of the product types sold by the company. These figures were then multiplied by assumed annual energy
consumption and an average emissions factor for the United States, to identify estimated emissions associated with use of products. The emissions factor was sourced
from the International Energy Agency, and global warming potentials were sourced from the IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report. Because there were no significant changes inthe business, the metric tons CO2e for use of sold products calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Utilized internal product sales data; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Metric tonnes CO2e
68
Emissions calculation methodology
End of life fate was determined by product sales and country regulations. Electronic waste is regulated in many countries and assumed to be recycled in such markets. Endof life emission factors were derived from emissions factors published by the Department of Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs. Because there were no significant
changes in the business, the metric tons CO2e for purchased goods and services calculated in 2017 was used for 2018 and 2019.
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Utilized internal product sales data; no external data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners.
Downstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Avaya does not have downstream leased assets.
CDP

Page 21 of 54

Franchises
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
This category is not applicable to Avaya because it does not have any franchises.
Investments
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
According to the GHG Protocol, this category is designed primarily for private and public financial institutions. Therefore, this category is not applicable to Avaya.
Other (upstream)
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
No other upstream categories were determined to be relevant to Avaya in our Scope 3 analysis.
Other (downstream)
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Metric tonnes CO2e
<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
No other downstream categories were determined to be relevant to Avaya in our Scope 3 analysis.

C6.7(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic carbon relevant to your organization?
No

C6.10

CDP

Page 22 of 54

(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit currency total revenue and provide any
additional intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Intensity figure
4.66
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, metric tons CO2e)36756
Metric denominator
full time equivalent (FTE) employee
Metric denominator: Unit total
7888
Scope 2 figure used
Location-based% change from previous year
23
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason for change
Note: metric denominator unit is number of FTE employees in FY19. Our intensity figure decreased because the reduction in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 (location-based)emissions exceeded the reduction in FTE employees from 2018 to 2019. Avaya’s Scope 1 and Scope 2 (location-based) emissions decreased by 24%, which was primarily
due to reductions in energy use in Avaya facilities/data centers and fuel usage of Avaya fleet, and the number of FTE employees decreased by 2% from 8,086 to 7,888.
Intensity figure
12.74
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, metric tons CO2e)36756
Metric denominator
unit total revenue
Metric denominator: Unit total
2887
Scope 2 figure used
Location-based% change from previous year
25
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason for change
Note: metric denominator unit is million in GAAP revenue for FY19. Our intensity figure decreased because the reduction in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 (location-based)emissions exceeded the change in GAAP revenue from 2018 to 2019. Avaya’s Scope 1 and Scope 2 (location-based) emissions decreased by 24%, which was primarily
due to reductions in energy use in Avaya facilities/data centers and fuel usage of Avaya fleet, and our revenue increased by 1% compared to FY18.

C7. Emissions breakdowns

C7.1(C7.1) Does your organization break down its Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type?
No

C7.2(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/region.
Country/Region

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

India

159

Ireland276

United States of America

16

Other, please specify (Corporate emissions from Avaya fleet (multiple countries))

4849

C7.3

CDP

Page 23 of 54

(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By facility
By activity

C7.3b(C7.3b) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business facility.
Facility

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

LatitudeLongitudePune-Tower III

62

18.50868

73.926527

Pune-Tower XI

77

18.514017

73.928495

Hyderabad-Vega20

17.448293

78.391485

Galway276

53.285348-9.025049

Columbia

16

39.168117-76.843701

Other, please specify: Corporate emissions from Avaya fleet (multiple facilities)

4849

C7.3c
(C7.3c) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Stationary diesel

435

Stationary natural gas

16

Avaya fleet

4849

C7.5

CDP

Page 24 of 54

(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/region.
Country/Region

Scope 2, location-based(metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based(metric tons CO2e)

Purchased and consumed electricity,heat, steam or cooling (MWh)China, Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region

76

76

104

Singapore

504

504

1030

Australia

578

578

804

China

637

637

1019

India

7781

7781

10828

Japan

340

340

649

Argentina

145

127

360

Brazil

52

52

443

France

18

14

239

Germany

1440

2552

3368

Hungary

191

290

764

Ireland

1322

2254

3536

Israel

875

875

1570

Italy

113

183

393

Spain

51

81

186

United Kingdom of GreatBritain and Northern Ireland

229

296

1020

Canada

311

206

2379

Mexico

382

382

879

United States of America

15061

15046

36565

Austria

5

10

21

Belgium

73

71

369

Chile

12

12

30

Taiwan, Greater China

37

37

70

Colombia

54

54

360

Croatia

6

15

31

Czechia

58

69

130

Denmark

3

9

21

Indonesia

35

35

54

Kenya

3

3

15

Republic of Korea

172

172

367

Luxembourg

12

12

37

Malaysia

54

54

96

Netherlands

102

128

275

New Zealand

6

6

43

Norway

1

3

13

Peru

7

7

30

Philippines

72

72

126

Poland

63

83

109

Russian Federation

87

87

273

Saudi Arabia

113

113

186

South Africa

18

18

23

Sweden3

4

56

Switzerland

37

20

270

Thailand

34

34

82

Turkey29

29

70

United Arab Emirates

254

254

451

Purchased and consumed low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or coolingaccounted for in Scope 2 market-based approach (MWh)C7.6(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By facility
By activity

C7.6b

CDP

Page 25 of 54

(C7.6b) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business facility.
Facility

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Causeway Bay

76

76

Singapore

365

365

North Ryde

453

453

Shanghai

117

117

Beijing - Oriental Plaza

210

210

Dalian207

207

Zhongshan

96

96

Bangalore-AMR Tech Park

160

160

Pune-Tower III

1335

1335

Pune-Tower XI

5078

5078

Hyderabad-Vega

849

849

Gurgaon-MG Road

100

100

Osaka

8

8

Tokyo

332

332

Buenos Aires

145

127

Sao Paulo

52

52

Paris

12

8

Dietzenbach

221

393

Dusseldorf

128

228

Frankfurt – Theodor Heuss Allee

382

679

Hamburg – Sachenstrasse

60

106

Leipzig

37

66

Munich64

113

Stuttgart

91

162

Budapest

191

290

Galway

1287

2196

Holon

875

875

Ancona – Radvision

53

87

Sesto San Giovanni - Via Nazario Sauro

22

36

Madrid43

68

Mexico City

108

108

Columbia

333

398

Thornton

3250

2831

Coppell

2198

2548

Highlands Ranch 8740

1463

1333

Highlands Ranch 8744

3701

3223

New York City

98

54

Santa Clara

266

236

Estimated sites (multiple facilities)

4396

4806

Carrollton Data Center

376

435

Frankfurt 1 & 2 Data Center

374

664

Lebanon Data Center

1704

2037

Singapore Data Center

139

139

Issy Les Moulineaux

1

1

C7.6c
(C7.6c) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business activity.
Activity

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Avaya facilities (purchased electricity)

24468

25602

Avaya facilities (estimated electricity)

3768

4178

Avaya facilities (estimated heating)

628

628

Data Centers (purchased electricity)

2592

3277

C7.9
(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Decreased

C7.9a

CDP

Page 26 of 54

(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined), and for each of them specify how your emissions compare
to the previous year.
Change in Direction Emissions
Please explain calculation
emissions of change value(metric(percentage)
tons
CO2e)
Change inrenewableenergyconsumption
Other
emissions
reduction
activities<Not
Applicable>
11718

Decreased 24

Divestment<Not
Applicable>

Acquisitions<Not
Applicable>

Mergers<Not
Applicable>

Change in
output<Not
Applicable>

Change inmethodology<Not
Applicable>

Change inboundary<Not
Applicable>

Change inphysicaloperatingconditions

172

Decreased 0.35

Unidentified<Not
Applicable
>

Other

<Not
Applicable>

Avaya achieved 11,718 mtCO2e due to real estate consolidations and a reduction in headcount: reduced electricity use in facilities (8,028 mtCO2e) and data
centers (431 mtCO2e); reduced fuel usage from Avaya fleet (2,089 mtCO2e); reduced natural gas usage for facilities (36 mtCO2e); reduced diesel fuel usage
for facilities (125 mtCO2e); and reduced electricity and natural gas usage for estimated sites (1,009 mtCO2e). The formula for the calculation is: (Change in
Scope 1 & 2 Emissions attributed to emission reduction activities/Previous year Scope 1 & 2 Emissions) x 100. Therefore, 11,718 mtCO2e was divided by the
48,646 mtCO2e, the 2018 gross Scope 1 and 2 location-based emissions, and then multiplied by 100 to calculate the 24% total reduction from emission
reduction activities.

The following building closures in 2019 lead to a reduction of 172 mtCO2e in Scope 2 location-based emissions, as follows: Beijing – Dongcheng District (70mtCO2e), New York City (71 mtCO2e), Almaty (15 mtCO2e), Doha (5 mtCO2e), Newport Beach (4 mtCO2e) and Novi (7 mtCO2e). The formula for the
calculation is: (Change in Scope 1 & 2 Emissions attributed to change in physical operating conditions/Previous year Scope 1 & 2 Emissions) x 100. Therefore,
172 mtCO2e was divided by 48,646 mtCO2e, the 2018 gross Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and then multiplied by 100 to calculate the 0.35% total reduction fromchange in physical operating conditions.

C7.9b(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-based Scope 2 emissions figure or a market-based Scope 2
emissions figure?
Location-based

C8. Energy

C8.1(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

C8.2(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Indicate whether your organization undertook this energy-related activity in the reporting year

CDP

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired steamNo

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling

No

Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling

No

Page 27 of 54

C8.2a(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
Heating value

MWh from renewable sources MWh from non-renewable sources Total (renewable and non-renewable) MWh

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)

Unable to confirm heating value 0

25136

25136

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity<Not Applicable>

5871

61071

69942

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

<Not Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy <Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Total energy consumption

5871

86207

92078

<Not Applicable>

C8.2b
(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this fuel application
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of heat

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of steamNo

Consumption of fuel for the generation of coolingNo

Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation

No

C8.2c
(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
DieselHeating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1622
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
1622
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Emission factor
0.2683Unit
metric tons CO2e per MWh
Emissions factor source
IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Natural Gasoline
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
3300
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
3300
CDP

Page 28 of 54

MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Emission factor
0.20251
Unit
metric tons CO2e per MWh
Emissions factor source
IPCC 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Comment
Fuels (excluding feedstocks)
Motor Gasoline
Heating value
Unable to confirm heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
20214
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
20214
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-cogeneration or self-trigeneration<Not Applicable>
Emission factor
8.78
Unit
kg CO2 per gallon
Emissions factor source
USEPA
Comment

C8.2e(C8.2e) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a zero emission factor in the market-based Scope 2
figure reported in C6.3.
Sourcing method
None (no purchases of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling)
Low-carbon technology type
<Not Applicable>
Country/region of consumption of low-carbon electricity, heat, steam or cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh consumed accounted for at a zero emission factor<Not Applicable>
Comment

C9. Additional metrics

C9.1(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.

CDP

Page 29 of 54

C10. Verification

C10.1(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Verification/assurance status
Scope 1No third-party verification or assurance

Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)

No third-party verification or assurance

Scope 3No third-party verification or assurance

C10.2(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related information reported in your CDP disclosure other than the emissions figures reported in C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
No, but we are actively considering verifying within the next two years

C11. Carbon pricing

C11.1(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS, Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
No, but we anticipate being regulated in the next three years

C11.1d(C11.1d) What is your strategy for complying with the systems you are regulated by or anticipate being regulated by?
Avaya has facilities and operations in 57 countries around the world, so we anticipate being regulated by a carbon pricing system in the next three years. Avaya’s Law Team
includes personnel who monitor, review, and provide legal advice on current and emerging policies and regulations that are applicable to our business. If Avaya must comply
with a carbon pricing system in the next three years, Avaya’s Senior Director of Corporate Responsibility, EHS and Philanthropy will work with the Law Team to ensurecompliance and inform relevant business divisions, including finance and operations, about the regulatory requirements.

C11.2(C11.2) Has your organization originated or purchased any project-based carbon credits within the reporting period?
No

C11.3
(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal price on carbon?
No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years

C12. Engagement

C12.1(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on climate-related issues?
Yes, our suppliers
Yes, our customers

C12.1aCDP

Page 30 of 54

(C12.1a) Provide details of your climate-related supplier engagement strategy.
Type of engagement
Compliance & onboarding
Details of engagement
Included climate change in supplier selection / management mechanism
Code of conduct featuring climate change KPIs
Climate change is integrated into supplier evaluation processes% of suppliers by number95% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)
94% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
32
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
As a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA), Avaya adopted the RBA Code of Conduct, which includes requirements related to air emissions, energy
consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, water management, and solid waste. Avaya requires its direct Tier 1 suppliers to adhere to the RBA Code of Conduct by including
it in our contracts.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
By requiring our direct Tier 1 suppliers to adhere to the RBA Code of Conduct, Avaya is promoting social, ethical, and environmental responsibility in the electronics supply
chain and reducing our supply chain risk. Avaya reserves the right to audit our suppliers to ensure compliance with the Code. Measures of success include: an increased
number of suppliers in the electronics industry adopting the RBA Code of Conduct; an increased number of suppliers passing audits; and reduced number of findings
resulting from supplier audits.
Comment
Type of engagement
Information collection (understanding supplier behavior)
Details of engagement
Collect climate change and carbon information at least annually from suppliers% of suppliers by number
8% total procurement spend (direct and indirect)64% of supplier-related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
22
Rationale for the coverage of your engagement
Avaya has access to the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) online tool which enables companies to request that their suppliers complete an annual Self-Assessment
Questionnaire (SAQ), which includes questions on their corporate environmental policy, procedures, and management system. In addition, Avaya has access to annual
supplier audits which evaluate their compliance with the RBA Code of Conduct requirements, which include measuring energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions,waste minimization, water management, air emission reduction, and labor and ethics.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successAvaya has access to supplier audits, findings, and corrective actions on the RBA online platform to ensure compliance with the code. Measures of success include:
improvements in supplier audit scores over time; reduced number of findings and increased number of corrective actions implemented; and increasing the number ofsuppliers completing the audits and SAQs.
Comment

C12.1b

CDP

Page 31 of 54

(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Type of engagement
Education/information sharing
Details of engagement
Share information about your products and relevant certification schemes (i.e. Energy STAR)% of customers by number
100% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
58
Portfolio coverage (total or outstanding)<Not Applicable>
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
Avaya shares information about the ENERGY STAR certification of our products (i.e. Avaya J129/J139/J169/J179 IP phones) publicly on our website and in our annual
Corporate Responsibility Report to enable access to our customers. In addition, Avaya responds to customer requests throughout the year and shares information on ourenvironmental performance, energy rating of our products, corporate responsibility initiatives, and carbon emissions data.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successAvaya improves its relationship with its customers by being transparent and sharing information on our environmental initiatives both publicly and through specific customer
questionnaires. Customer satisfaction with our questionnaire responses, which can be measured by our rating on customer surveys, is an important measure of our
success.
Type of engagement
Education/information sharing
Details of engagement
Run an engagement campaign to education customers about your climate change performance and strategy% of customers by number
100% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
58
Portfolio coverage (total or outstanding)<Not Applicable>
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
As a member of the climate advocacy group, We Are Still In, Avaya participated in the We Are Taking Action Campaign. As part of the campaign, Avaya submitted a
Climate Action Contribution on their website to share information about our current goals and strategy to reduce our carbon emissions, and updates this information
annually. This information is made available to our customers on a public platform to raise awareness, stand firm in our commitments, and foster opportunities forcollaboration.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successAvaya’s participating in the We Are Taking Action Campaign helped encourage others to step up and join the fight against climate change. A measure of success is the total
number of Climate Action Contributions submitted as part of the campaign. There were 880 total contributions, which included businesses, investors, cities, states, counties,
cultural and educational institutions, and tribes.
Type of engagement
Education/information sharing
Details of engagement
Run an engagement campaign to educate customers about the climate change impacts of (using) your products, goods, and/or services% of customers by number
0.01% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
58
Portfolio coverage (total or outstanding)<Not Applicable>
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
Avaya engaged with 19 customers who requested us to respond to CDP to: (1) share our 2018 CDP report results; and (2) help customers minimize their carbon footprint
using Avaya technology. The Avaya IX Collaboration Unit CU360 enables customers to turn existing spaces into video collaboration rooms. This solution allows customers
to host engaging, efficient meetings and avoid the cost, hassle, and Scope 3 carbon emissions associated with air travel.
Impact of engagement, including measures of successAvaya improves its relationship with its customers by responding to CDP annually and sharing our results, and also helping them minimize their carbon footprint with Avaya
technology. Key measures of success are the number of email responses to our outreach and the sales of CU360 as a result of our outreach.

C12.3(C12.3) Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence public policy on climate-related issues through any of the following?
Trade associations
Other

CDP

Page 32 of 54

C12.3b(C12.3b) Are you on the board of any trade associations or do you provide funding beyond membership?
No

C12.3e(C12.3e) Provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake.
Avaya is a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (RBA) and has partnered with organizations such as the Silicon Valley Leadership Group to discuss climate change
and related policies.

C12.3f(C12.3f) What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climatechange strategy?
Avaya’s Law Team includes personnel who monitor, review, and provide legal advice on current and emerging policies that are applicable to our business. Avaya’s SeniorDirector of Corporate Responsibility, EHS and Philanthropy meets monthly with regulatory review personnel to exchange information and receive guidance to ensure ouractivities that influence policy are consistent with Avaya’s overall climate change strategy. In addition, quarterly meetings are held with Avaya management to review ourbusiness activities and ensure consistency with climate change strategy and objectives.

C12.4(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places
other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Publication
In mainstream reports
StatusComplete
Attach the document
Avaya 10-K FY19.pdf
Page/Section reference
Risk Factors, pg. 31
Content elements
Risks & opportunities
Comment
Publication
In voluntary sustainability report
StatusComplete
Attach the document
FY19 Corporate Responsibility Highlights.pdf
Page/Section reference
Environment, pg. 2
Content elements
Strategy
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment

C15. Signoff

C-FI(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional information or context that you feel is relevant to your organization's response. Please note that this field is optional
and is not scored.

CDP

Page 33 of 54

C15.1(C15.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.

Row 1

Job title

Corresponding job category

VP & Deputy General Counsel

Other, please specify (VP & Deputy General Counsel)

SC. Supply chain module

SC0.0(SC0.0) If you would like to do so, please provide a separate introduction to this module.

SC0.1(SC0.1) What is your company’s annual revenue for the stated reporting period?
Annual Revenue
Row 12887000000

SC0.2(SC0.2) Do you have an ISIN for your company that you would be willing to share with CDP?
Yes

SC0.2a(SC0.2a) Please use the table below to share your ISIN.

Row 1

ISIN country code (2 letters)

ISIN numeric identifier and single check digit (10 numbers overall)

US0534991098

SC1.1(SC1.1) Allocate your emissions to your customers listed below according to the goods or services you have sold them in this reporting period.
Requesting member
Amdocs Ltd
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
1
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
CDP

Page 34 of 54

Requesting member
AT&T Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e40
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Bank of America
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
24
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Barclays
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
12
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 35 of 54

Requesting member
BT Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e21
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for BT, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e2
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
California Department of General Services (DGS)
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeAvaya provides an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions, where data is available, based upon customer-specific sales versus total sales. Due to lack of available
data, Avaya is unable to allocate emissions to DGS at this time. However, we are exploring this capability for future reporting cycles.

CDP

Page 36 of 54

Requesting member
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for Hewlett Packard, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
HP IncScope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e87
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e6
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 37 of 54

Requesting member
Mastercard Incorporated
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
14
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for Mastercard, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
MetLife, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for MetLife, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
Prudential Financial, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeAvaya provides an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions, where data is available, based upon customer-specific sales versus total sales. Due to lack of available
data, Avaya is unable to allocate emissions to Prudential at this time. However, we are exploring this capability for future reporting cycles.

CDP

Page 38 of 54

Requesting member
Swisscom
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e2
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
The Allstate Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
12
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
U.S. General Services Administration - OMB ICR #3090-0319
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for GSA, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.

CDP

Page 39 of 54

Requesting member
Verizon Communications Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e20
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Vodafone Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
15
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Wells Fargo & Company
Scope of emissions
Scope 1
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
14
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
On-site fuel combustion from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 40 of 54

Requesting member
Amdocs Ltd
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e8
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
AT&T Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e239
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Bank of America
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
140
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 41 of 54

Requesting member
Barclays
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e72
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
BT Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
113
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for BT, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e9
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 42 of 54

Requesting member
California Department of General Services (DGS)
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeAvaya provides an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions, where data is available, based upon customer-specific sales versus total sales. Due to lack of available
data, Avaya is unable to allocate emissions to DGS at this time. However, we are exploring this capability for future reporting cycles.
Requesting member
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for Hewlett Packard, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
HP IncScope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e472
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 43 of 54

Requesting member
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
35
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Mastercard Incorporated
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e74
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. FY19 data was unavailable for Mastercard, so FY18 was provided as an estimate.
Requesting member
MetLife, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
1
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 44 of 54

Requesting member
Prudential Financial, Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeAvaya provides an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions, where data is available, based upon customer-specific sales versus total sales. Due to lack of available
data, Avaya is unable to allocate emissions to Prudential at this time. However, we are exploring this capability for future reporting cycles.
Requesting member
Swisscom
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
14
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
The Allstate Corporation
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e72
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 45 of 54

Requesting member
U.S. General Services Administration - OMB ICR #3090-0319
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e0
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales. Due to lack of available sales data for GSA in FY19, FY18 data was used as an estimate.
Requesting member
Verizon Communications Inc.
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e118
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.
Requesting member
Vodafone Group
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e
88
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

CDP

Page 46 of 54

Requesting member
Wells Fargo & Company
Scope of emissions
Scope 2
Allocation level
Company wide
Allocation level detail<Not Applicable>
Emissions in metric tonnes of CO2e82
Uncertainty (±%)
Major sources of emissions
Electricity consumption from facilities
VerifiedNo
Allocation method
Allocation based on the market value of products purchased
Please explain how you have identified the GHG source, including major limitations to this process and assumptions madeDue to the complexity of data, Avaya is providing an allocation based upon Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Scope 1 and 2 emissions have been allocated based upon customerspecific sales versus Avaya’s total sales.

SC1.2(SC1.2) Where published information has been used in completing SC1.1, please provide a reference(s).

SC1.3(SC1.3) What are the challenges in allocating emissions to different customers, and what would help you to overcome these challenges?
Allocation challenges

Please explain what would help you overcome these challenges

Diversity of product lines makes
accurately accounting for eachproduct/product line cost ineffective

Because our product lines are diverse, complex and continuously evolving, it is difficult to categorize groups of products and quantify their associated carbon emissions. In
addition, the Avaya EHS/CSR team has been unable to obtain detailed data on the list of products/product lines used for each customer. For future reporting cycles, Avaya will
work internally to obtain the necessary data and reports in order to improve the accuracy of our emission allocations.

SC1.4(SC1.4) Do you plan to develop your capabilities to allocate emissions to your customers in the future?
Yes

SC1.4a(SC1.4a) Describe how you plan to develop your capabilities.
Avaya EHS/CSR will work internally with the sales and product team to try to obtain the data needed to improve the accuracy of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emission
allocations. Additionally, we are working on our capabilities to allocate Scope 3 emissions to our customers in addition to Scope 1 and Scope 2.

SC2.1(SC2.1) Please propose any mutually beneficial climate-related projects you could collaborate on with specific CDP Supply Chain members.
Requesting member
Amdocs Ltd
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Other, please specify
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
CDP

Page 47 of 54

1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
AT&T Inc.
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
Avaya has met with AT&T to discuss how our technology could enable them to reduce carbon emissions from business travel. We are open to pursuing this or other joint
projects where we could work together to achieve CO2 reductions.
Requesting member
Bank of America
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Barclays
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
BT Group

CDP

Page 48 of 54

Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
Avaya has met with BT to discuss how our technology could enable them to reduce carbon emissions from business travel. We are open to pursuing this or other joint
projects where we could work together to achieve CO2 reductions.
Requesting member
Caesars Entertainment
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
California Department of General Services (DGS)Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
CDP

Page 49 of 54

Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
HP IncGroup type of project
Other, please specify (To be determine)Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Itaú Unibanco Holding S.A.
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Mastercard Incorporated
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
MetLife, Inc.
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project

CDP

Page 50 of 54

Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
Avaya has met with MetLife to discuss how our technology could enable them to reduce carbon emissions from business travel. We are open to pursuing this or other joint
projects where we could work together to achieve CO2 reductions.
Requesting member
Prudential Financial, Inc.
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Swisscom
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
The Allstate Corporation
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into the
CDP

Page 51 of 54

CO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
U.S. General Services Administration - OMB ICR #3090-0319
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Verizon Communications Inc.
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Vodafone Group
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions
Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.
Requesting member
Wells Fargo & Company
Group type of project
Other, please specify (To be determined)
Type of project
Other, please specify (TBD)
Emissions targeted
Actions that would reduce both our own and our customers’ emissions

CDP

Page 52 of 54

Estimated timeframe for carbon reductions to be realized
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime CO2e savings
Estimated payback
1-3 years
Details of proposal
We are open to working with our customers. We are looking for tools and methodologies that are robust, sustaining and cost effective. We have not found such tools atpresent and welcome any guidance. Since ICT technologies have carbon enablement benefits, there may be an opportunity to pursue a joint project looking further into theCO2 reductions that have been realized by the customer per its adoption of Avaya technology.

SC2.2(SC2.2) Have requests or initiatives by CDP Supply Chain members prompted your organization to take organizational-level emissions reduction initiatives?
No

SC3.1
(SC3.1) Do you want to enroll in the 2020-2021 CDP Action Exchange initiative?
Yes

SC3.1a(SC3.1a) Identify which member(s), if any, have motivated you to take part in Action Exchange this year.
Please selectSC3.1b
(SC3.1b) Select the types of emissions reduction activities that your company would like support in analyzing or in implementing in the next reporting year.
Company policy or behavioral change
Energy efficiency in buildings
Low-carbon energy consumption
Waste reduction and material circularity

SC3.1c(SC3.1c) As part of Action Exchange, would you like facility level analysis?
No

SC3.2
(SC3.2) Is your company a participating supplier in CDP’s 2019-2020 Action Exchange initiative?
No

SC4.1
(SC4.1) Are you providing product level data for your organization’s goods or services?
No, I am not providing data

Submit your response
In which language are you submitting your response?
EnglishPlease confirm how your response should be handled by CDP

I am submitting my response

CDP

I am submitting to

Public or Non-Public Submission

Are you ready to submit the additional Supply Chain Questions?

Customers

Public<Not Applicable>

Page 53 of 54

Please confirm below
I have read and accept the applicable Terms

CDP

Page 54 of 54