AUTHOR INDEX (Vols. 31–35)
Invited Articles
1. A, A. The Causative Alternation Revisited: Constraints and Variation.
2. B, Ž. On Pronouns, Clitic Doubling,and Argument Ellipsis: Argument Ellipsis as Predicate Ellipsis.
3. C
, L
L -S
. On the Interaction between
Modals and Aspects.
4. C, W. Studying Language as a Complex
Adaptive System.
5. F,A. (See M. N
, N. Yand A. F(2019))
6. N
, M
, N
Y
and
A
F
. Intervention in Japanese EFL
Learners’ Control Constructions with Quantifiers.
7. S, M. Notes on the Locality of Anaphor
Binding and A-movement.
, U . Counterparts Block Some ‘De Re’
8. S
Readings.
9. Y, N. (See M. N
, N.
Yand A. F(2019))

32:1 (2015) 1–21

35:1 (2018) 1–37
35:2 (2019) 241–260
31:1 (2014) 1–21
35:2 (2019) 221–240

35:2 (2019) 221–240
34:1 (2017) 1–33
35:1 (2018) 38–64
35:2 (2019) 221–240

Articles, Brief Articles, Articles on a Specified Topic, Notes and Discussion
1. A, N. Indeterminate Pronoun Binding
and Bound Pronouns in Japanese Raising-toObject Construction: Agree-based Construal.
32:2 (2015) 261–292
2. A,A. Two Types of Main Verb Inversion. 31:1 (2014) 22–44
3. B , L . (See H. M , L. B , W. B
and M.
H(2016))
33:1 (2016) 1–35
4. B , W. (See H. M , L. B , W. B
and M. H(2016))
33:1 (2016) 1–35
5. B
,H. (See H. M
and H. B(2015))
32:2 (2015) 327–345
6. C, C-Y . Direction of Stress Shifts inNoun-Verb Pairs and Progressions in American
and British English.
31:2 (2014) 401–438
−1−

2

7. C

, C
-Y . Word Frequency, Entry Date, andEntry Status in Relation to Stress Shifts in English
Noun-Verb Pairs.
8. F , L -Y . (See H. M , L-Y. F
and C.
W(2015))
9. F,C. Against Feature “Copying.”
10. G
, N
. (See Y. S , N. G
and S. K(2018))
11. H
, M
, H
M
and T
U
. Where the Nominative/Genitive Alternation Genuinely Takes Place in Modern Japanese.
12. H
, M
. (See H. M , L. B , W. B
and M. H(2016))
13. H
, M
, H
M
and F
N
. On the Scope of Naze ‘Why’ in Japanese.
14. H
, N
. The Derivation of Non-Restrictive Relative Clauses and Their Invisibilities.
15. H
, S
. Why Is the Wdydwyd Construction Used in the Way It Is Used?
16. H
, I
. Support for Feature Inheritance inEnglish.
17. H, Y. Be Said to V as an Evidential
Construction.
18. H
, Y
. An Overview of the Three-Tier
Model of Language Use.
19. H
, Y
. (See T. S
and Y. H(2015))
20. I, K. The It Is That-Construction and
Abductive Inference.
21. I
, K
. (See R. N
and K. I(2017))
22. K,T. A Comparative Study of the vP
Domain in English and Japanese.
23. K, S -I . (See Y. S , N. G
and S.
K(2018))
24. K,A. Relativized Agree.
25. K,R. Eliminating PF-Reanalysis.
26. K, K . The Development of Negative-Initial
Constructions in the History of English.
27. K, K . Subextraction from NP and Cyclic Linearization.

33:2 (2017) 231–271
32:1 (2015) 59–77
31:1 (2014) 114–129
35:1 (2018) 96–121

31:1 (2014) 149–160
33:1 (2016) 1–35
33:2 (2017) 478–498
35:1 (2018) 65–95
33:2 (2017) 499–510
31:2 (2014) 583–592
33:1 (2016) 88–99
32:1 (2015) 120–138
32:1 (2015) 114–119
31:1 (2014) 161–172
33:2 (2017) 478–498
33:2 (2017) 272–306
35:1 (2018) 96–121
31:2 (2014) 439–476
33:1 (2016) 100–107
33:2 (2017) 307–339
35:2 (2019) 297–315

3

28. K

, R
. Two Types of Extraposition Construction in English.
29. K
, H
. The Grammatical Significance ofPrivate Expression and Its Implications for theThree-Tier Model of Language Use.
30. K
,T. The Syntax of Japanese Reciprocal
V-V Compounds: A View from Split Antecedents.
31. L , S . Ordering Relations among Positional
Functions: Constraints vs. Rules.
32. M
, M
. Ellipsis as Topicalization in Derivational Cartographic Structures.
33. M
, H
. Reconstruction, Cyclic Transfer
and Reintegration.
34. M , H
and D
P. Ó B. Embedded
Topicalization in Irish.
35. M , H
. (See M. H
, H. Mand T.
U(2014))
36. M , H
and D
P. Ó Baoill. Clausal Arguments in Irish.
37. M , H
, L -YF and C W
. DoesModern Chinese Allow Genitive Subjects?
38. M , H
. (See D. P. Ó B
and H. M(2015))
39. M , H
and H
B. The Absolutive/
Genitive Alternation in Selayarese.
40. M , H
, L
B , W
B
and
M
H
. Scrambling and Genitive Subjects in Mongolian.
. (See M. H
, H. Mand F.
41. M , HN
(2017))
42. M,A. Embedded Imperatives in Control.
43. M
, T
. The Syntactic Structure of
Wh-Syntactic Amalgams.
44. M
, T
. Transparent Free Relatives as
Specifying Coordination.
45. M
, M
. Superiority Eﬀects in Minimalism: A Case Study of A-Movement.
46. M
, M
. De-activation of ϕ throughPair-Merge.
47. N , R
. Deverbal Noun-Forming Processes inEnglish.

32:2 (2015) 346–356

32:1 (2015) 139–155
31:1 (2014) 45–78
32:2 (2015) 293–326
34:2 (2018) 331–347
35:2 (2019) 261–296
31:1 (2014) 130–148
31:1 (2014) 149–160
31:2 (2014) 545–562
32:1 (2015) 59–77
32:1 (2015) 102–113
32:2 (2015) 327–345

33:1 (2016) 1–35
33:2 (2017) 478–498
33:2 (2017) 340–376
32:1 (2015) 78–101
34:2 (2018) 235–265
31:2 (2014) 563–582
33:1 (2016) 108–118
33:1 (2016) 36–68

4

48. N

, R
and K
I
. Semi-Lexical
Categories in Word-Formation: A Case Study inJapanese Mimetic Compounds.
49. N
, F
. (See M. H
, H. M
andF. N(2017))50. N, K. Competition Theory and a New
Perspective on Cross-Linguistic Variations.
51. Ó B, D
P. (See H. M
and D. P. Ó
B(2014))
52. Ó B, D
P. (See H. M
and D. P. Ó
B(2014))
53. Ó B, D
P. and H
M . Puzzles
with the Subject Position in Irish.
54. O, J . Reformulating Pair-Merge of Heads.
55. O,T. An Extension of Feature-Inheritance.
56. O,T. Radical Free Merger.
57. S , Y
, N
Gand S -IK.
On the In-situ Theory of Sluicing in English: A
New Perspective from “Immobile” Elements.
58. S
, R
. On the Development of The
Point Is and Related Issues in the History ofAmerican English.
59. S, S . On the Nature of English Gerunds.
60. S,T. The Rhetorical Eﬀect of Locative
Inversion Constructions from the Perspective of
the Three-Tier Model of Language Use.
61. S
, T
and Y
H
. Introduction:
Public/Private-Self-Centeredness and Grammatical
Phenomena in Japanese and English—The Perspective of the Three-Tier Model of Language Use.
62. T
, Y
. A DP Movement Approach toRelativization from VP Idioms: Toward a Unified
Approach.
63. T, R . A Unified Account of Elliptical Constructions in Terms of the Labeling Theory.
64. T
, H
. A Minimalist Analysis of Two
Types of English Right Node Raising Constructions.
65. T, S . Agreement, Labeling and Sentential Subjects.

33:2 (2017) 377–414
33:2 (2017) 478–498
31:2 (2014) 477–508
31:1 (2014) 130–148
31:2 (2014) 545–562
32:1 (2015) 102–113
34:2 (2018) 266–301
31:2 (2014) 509–544
34:1 (2017) 34–68

35:1 (2018) 96–121

31:1 (2014) 79–113
33:2 (2017) 415–444

32:1 (2015) 156–176

32:1 (2015) 114–119

34:2 (2018) 348–365
33:2 (2017) 445–477
33:1 (2016) 69–87
34:2 (2018) 302–330

5

66. T

, T
. On Labeling in Free Relative
Clauses in English.
67. U
, T
. (See M. H
, H. MandT. U(2014))68. W, C . (See H. M , L-Y. F and C. W
(2015))69. Y, M. Deriving the Direct Object
Restriction.
70. Y
, M
. Two Types of External Causes
and an Implication for Causative Alternation.

Review Articles
1. F , T. Radical Argument Drop Viewed
through Parametric Variation (T. Biberauer, A.
Holmberg, I. Roberts and M. Sheehan, Parametric
Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory).
2. I , T. On Symmetric Aspects of Grammar. (B.
Citko, Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels).
3. I, S . Aspect and Force Dynamics: Which Is
More Essential to Resultatives? (W. Croft, Verbs:
Aspect and Causal Structure).
4. O, M. What Really Happened to Impersonal Constructions in Medieval English (R.
Möhlig-Falke, The Early English Impersonal Construction: An Analysis of Verbal and Constructional Meaning).
5. T, H. Is the Theory of Politeness Pragmalinguistic or Sociopragmatic?: A New Look
into the Universality/Culture-Specificity Divide (G.
Leech, The Pragmatics of Politeness).
6. T,S . Two Phonologies or One?: Some
Implications of the DYG for Biolinguistics (B. D.
Samuels, Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective).
7. T, H. Prominence and Structure of Compounds (G. Kunter, Compound Stress in English:
The Phonetics and Phonology of Prosodic Prominence).

32:1 (2015) 22–58
31:1 (2014) 149–160
32:1 (2015) 59–77
35:1 (2018) 151–172
35:1 (2018) 122–150

31:1 (2014) 173–202

31:1 (2014) 203–233

31:1 (2014) 234–263

31:2 (2014) 623–658

33:2 (2017) 511–543

31:2 (2014) 593–622

33:1 (2016) 119–144

6

Reviews
1. A, K . Construction Morphology (G. Booij).
2. A, N. External Arguments in Transitivity
Alternations: A Layering Approach (A. Alexiadou,
E. Anagnostopoulou and F. Schäfer).
3. D, Y. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation (N. Dehé).
4. F, H. The Phonology of Contrast (A.
Łubowicz).
5. G,N. A Syntax of Substance (D. Adger).
6. H, K . Sluicing: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives(J. Merchant and A. Simpson).
7. H, A . Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of
Elisabeth Selkirk (T. Borowsky et al. (eds.)).
8. I , R. Discourse Markers in Early Modern
English (U. Lutzky).
9. I, H. Perspectives on Agrammatism (R.
Bastiaanse and C. K. Thompson (eds.)).
10. I
, Y
. Agreement and Its Failures (O.
Preminger).
11. I, Y . The Syntax of Yes and No (A.
Holmberg).
12. I, S . Advances in Research on Semantic
Roles (S. Kittilä and F. Zúñiga (eds.)).
13. K
, N
. Case: Its Principles and Its Parameters (M. Baker).
14. K
, S
. Telicity, Change, and State:
A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure (V.
Demonte and L. McNally (eds.)).
15. K
, M
. Motivation in Grammar and the
Lexicon (K.-U. Panther and G. Radden (eds.)).
16. K
, H
. Symmetry Breaking in Syntax (H.
Haider).
17. K, C
U . Predicate Concatenation:
A Study of the V-te V Predicate in Japanese (K.
Nakatani).
18. K
, H
. The In-Situ Approach to Sluicing(J. Abe).
19. K , K
. Strengthening the PRO Hypothesis(L. A. Reed).
20. K
, H
. Phrase Structure and Argument

31:1 (2014) 275–283

35:2 (2019) 338–350
35:1 (2018) 173–183
33:1 (2016) 145–156
31:2 (2014) 681–692
31:1 (2014) 339–352
31:2 (2014) 659–670
32:1 (2015) 236–244
31:1 (2014) 376–387
34:1 (2017) 93–104
35:1 (2018) 184–192
35:2 (2019) 327–337
35:2 (2019) 316–326

32:2 (2015) 371–384
31:2 (2014) 703–713
32:1 (2015) 198–210

32:2 (2015) 357–370
34:1 (2017) 105–116
33:2 (2017) 544–555

7Structure: A Case Study of the Syntax-Semantics
Interface (T. Lohndal).
21. K, S -I . Control in Generative Grammar:
A Research Companion (I. Landau).
22. K
, M
. The Phonological Mind (I.
Berent).
23. K, M. Sociophonetics: An Introduction (E. R. Thomas).
24. K
, T
. Errors and Disfluencies in Spoken Corpora (G. Gilquin and S. De Cock (eds.)).
25. K
, C
. The English It-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation (A. L. Patten).
26. K
, Y
. Constructions and Environments:
Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in
Old and Middle English (P. Petré).
, T. Compositional Semantics: An In27. K
troduction to the Syntax/Semantics Interface (P.
Jacobson).
28. K
, K
. Edges in Syntax: Scrambling
and Cyclic Linearization (H. Ko).
29. M
, M
. Beyond Functional Sequence: The
Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 10(U. Shlonsky (ed.)).
30. M
, C
. Go to Ku to Nazuke-kinoo:
Niti-eigo no “Keiyoosi + Meisi”-kei o Tyuusin ni(Words, Phrases and the Naming Function: With a
Focus on “Adjective + Noun” Forms in Japaneseand English) (R. Shimamura).
31. M
, J
. The Syntax of Roots and the Rootsof Syntax (A. Alexiadou, H. Borer and F. Schäfer(eds.)).
32. M,K. Rich Languages from Poor Inputs(M. Piattelli-Palmarini and R. C. Berwick (eds.)).
33. M
, M
. The Phonology of Japanese(L. Labrune).
34. N
, Y
. Evur Happie & Glorious, ﬀor
I Hafe at Will Grete Riches (L. Sikorska and M.
Krygier (eds.)).
35. N
, A
. Creative Compounding in English:
The Semantics of Metaphorical and Metonymical

35:2 (2019) 351–360
32:2 (2015) 397–409
32:1 (2015) 177–184
31:2 (2014) 671–680
32:2 (2015) 410–418

32:2 (2015) 419–431

33:2 (2017) 580–590

34:1 (2017) 173–182
34:2 (2018) 366–374

34:1 (2017) 117–128

34:1 (2017) 69–80

34:1 (2017) 81–92
33:2 (2017) 616–631
31:1 (2014) 264–274

34:2 (2018) 375–386

8Noun-Noun Combinations (R. Benczes).
, T. Pseudogapping and Ellipsis (K.
Gengel).
37. N, H. The Minimalist Program: The Nature and Plausibility of Chomsky’s Biolinguistics(F. R. Al-Mutairi).
38. N
, H
. Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English (A.
Meurman-Solin, M. J. López-Couso and B. Los(eds.)).
39. N, F. Structuring Sense: Volume III:Taking Form (H. Borer).
40. N
, S
. On the Compositional Natureof States (E. M. Husband).
41. N
, M
. Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach (V. Evans).
42. O
, Y
. Regimes of Derivation in Syntax
and Morphology (E. Williams).
43. O
, H
. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (E. C. Traugott and G.
Trousdale).
44. O , S
. Gengo no Sekkei・Hattatu・Sinka(The Design, Development and Evolution of Language) (K. Fujita, N. Fukui, N. Yusa and M.
Ike-uchi (eds.)).
45. O, R . Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigmbased Model (A. Spencer).
46. S
, T
. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics (F.
Recanati).
47. S, S -I. Patterns and Categories in English Suﬃxation and Stress Placement: A Theoretical and Quantitative Study (H. Zamma).
48. S , K
. Old Northumbrian Verbal Morphosyntax and the (Northern) Subject Rule (M. Cole).
. Derivational Linearization at the
49. S , Y
Syntax-Prosody Interface (K. Shiobara).
50. S
, O
. Modality, Subjectivity and Semantic Change: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (H.
Narrog).
51. S, R. Morphosyntactic Change: A
Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes (B.

31:1 (2014) 312–324

36. N

33:2 (2017) 556–566

35:1 (2018) 193–203

31:1 (2014) 353–364
32:2 (2015) 385–396
31:2 (2014) 693–702
32:2 (2015) 442–453
31:1 (2014) 284–296

33:2 (2017) 604–615

34:1 (2017) 162–172
33:1 (2016) 202–212
31:1 (2014) 365–375

33:1 (2016) 157–167
34:1 (2017) 195–205
31:1 (2014) 325–338

32:1 (2015) 223–235

9Los, C. Blom, G. Booij, M. Elenbaas and A. van
Kemenade).
52. S
, C
. The Historical Phonology ofVowel Length (B. E. de Chene).
53. S
, H
. Where Do Phonological Features Come From?: Cognitive, Physical and Developmental Bases of Distinctive Speech Categories (G. N. Clements and R. Ridouane (eds.)).
54. S
, M
. (Re)labeling (C. Cecchetto and
C. Donati).
55. S
, K
. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in
Language, Thought and Communication (J.
Littlemore).
56. S
, T
. Interpreting Motion: Grounded Representations for Spatial Language (I. Mani and J.
Pustejovsky).
57. T
, T
. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives and the Structure of Words (J. D. Bobaljik).
58. T
, M
. Japanese Syntax in Comparative Perspective (M. Saito).
59. T
, H
. Culinary Verbs in Middle English(M. Bator).
60. T
, A
S. The Sonority Controversy (S.
Parker (ed.)).
61. T,J. Perspectives on Semantic Roles (S.
Luraghi and H. Narrog (eds.)).
62. T,T. Explorations in Maximizing Syntactic Minimization (S. D. Epstein, H. Kitahara
and T. D. Seely).
63. T
, S
. Diachrony and Synchrony inEnglish Corpus Linguistics (A. Alcaraz-Sintes and
S. Valera-Hernández (eds.)).
64. U
, K
. Understanding Pragmatics (G.
Senft).
65. U, T. Advances in Generative Lexicon
Theory (J. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K.
Kanzaki and C. Lee (eds.)).
66. Y
, I
. The Modular Architecture ofGrammar (J. M. Sadock).

33:2 (2017) 591–603
33:1 (2016) 178–189

33:1 (2016) 168–177
34:1 (2017) 129–137

34:1 (2017) 183–194

32:2 (2015) 432–441

32:1 (2015) 185–197
34:1 (2017) 138–149
34:1 (2017) 206–213
33:1 (2016) 190–201
33:2 (2017) 567–579

34:1 (2017) 150–161

34:2 (2018) 387–397
32:2 (2015) 454–465

32:1 (2015) 211–222
31:1 (2014) 297–311

10Obituary
1. C,S. Akira Ota (1917–2015)
2. K,M. Minoru Yasui (1921–2016)
3. N,H. Kazuko Inoue (1919–2017)33:2 (2017) 632–635
34:1 (2017) 214–216
34:2 (2018) 398–401