Fortive - Climate Change 2023
C0. Introduction

C0.1(C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization.
Fortive Corporation is a provider of essential technologies for connected workflow solutions across a range of attractive industrial technology end-markets. Our strategic
segments - Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions - include well-known brands with leading positions in their markets.
Our businesses design, develop, manufacture, and service professional and engineered products, software, and services, building upon leading brand names, innovativetechnologies, and significant market positions. We are guided by our shared purpose to deliver essential technology for the people who accelerate progress in buildings,
factories, and hospitals, and we are united by our culture of continuous improvement and bias for action that embody the Fortive Business System (“FBS”). Through rigorous
application of the proprietary set of growth, lean, and leadership tools and processes that comprise FBS, we continuously improve business performance in the critical areasof innovation, product development and commercialization, global supply chain, sales and marketing, and leadership development. Our commitment to FBS enables us todrive higher customer satisfaction and profitability, and generate significant improvements in innovation, growth, and core operating margins. Additionally, our FBS tools
enable us to execute a disciplined acquisition strategy and expand our portfolio into new and attractive markets, evolving to further our goal of creating long-term shareholder
value. For more information please visit: www.fortive.com.

C0.2(C0.2) State the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data and indicate whether you will be providing emissions data for past reporting
years.
Reporting year
Start date
January 1 2022
End date
December 31 2022
Indicate if you are providing emissions data for past reporting years
Yes
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 1 emissions data for
3 years
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 2 emissions data for
3 years
Select the number of past reporting years you will be providing Scope 3 emissions data for
1 year

C0.3

CDP

Page 1 of 68

(C0.3) Select the countries/areas in which you operate.
BrazilCanadaChile
China
Colombia
FinlandFranceGermany
GreeceHong Kong SAR, China
India
Indonesia
IsraelItaly
Japan
MexicoNetherlands
New Zealand
PolandPortugal
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Slovakia
South Africa
Spain
SwedenSwitzerland
Taiwan, China
ThailandTurkeyUnited Arab Emirates
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
United States of America
Viet Nam

C0.4(C0.4) Select the currency used for all financial information disclosed throughout your response.
USD

C0.5
(C0.5) Select the option that describes the reporting boundary for which climate-related impacts on your business are being reported. Note that this option shouldalign with your chosen approach for consolidating your GHG inventory.
Operational control

C0.8(C0.8) Does your organization have an ISIN code or another unique identifier (e.g., Ticker, CUSIP, etc.)?
Indicate whether you are able to provide a unique identifier for your organization

Provide your unique identifier

Yes, a Ticker symbol

FTV

C1. GovernanceC1.1(C1.1) Is there board-level oversight of climate-related issues within your organization?
Yes

CDP

Page 2 of 68

C1.1a(C1.1a) Identify the position(s) (do not include any names) of the individual(s) on the board with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position ofindividual orcommittee

Responsibilities for climate-related issues

Director on board

The entire Board of Directors has oversight responsibility for the Sustainability/ESG program. The Nominating & Governance committee has direct oversight and responsibility including climaterelated issues, strategy, and reporting.

Board-levelcommittee

As identified in their charter (Fortive 2023 Proxy Statement, pp. 21-22, 24, 29, and 40) the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board assists the Board in oversight of the Company’s
Sustainability/ESG program and strategies, including risks and opportunities, climate-related goals and strategies, progress, shareholder engagement, and reporting.

Chief Executive
Officer (CEO)The CEO is a member of the Board. The entire Board of Directors has oversight responsibility for the Sustainability/ESG program. The Nominating & Governance committee has directoversight and responsibility, including climate-related issues, strategy, and reporting.

C1.1b(C1.1b) Provide further details on the board’s oversight of climate-related issues.
Frequency with Governance mechanisms into which climate-related issues Scope of Please explain
which climate- are integrated
boardrelated issues
level
are a scheduled
oversight
agenda item
Other, please
specify(Scheduled –quarterly andannually )Overseeing acquisitions, mergers, and divestitures<Not
Reviewing innovation/R&D priorities
Applicabl
Reviewing and guiding strategye>Monitoring progress towards corporate targets
Reviewing and guiding the risk management process
Other, please specify (Overseeing climate-related strategies,
goals, results and reporting every meeting of the Nominatingand Governance Committee, as well as climate-related
strategies, risk management, and reporting on an annual basiswith the full Board of Directors )The Board has delegated to the Nominating and Governance Committee the responsibility of exercising oversight withrespect to Fortive's Sustainability disclosures. Consistent with such delegation, our SVP, General Counsel provides
frequent reports and updates to the Nominating and Governance Committee, and a report to the Board on an annual
basis, with an update on the Sustainability strategy, including relevant and material risks and opportunities, goals,
progress, shareholder engagement and disclosure.

C1.1d(C1.1d) Does your organization have at least one board member with competence on climate-related issues?
Board member(s)Criteria used to assess competence of board member(s) on climate-related
have competence on issues
climate-related
issuesRow Yes1

ESG (Sustainability) experience is among the skills and attributes that areincorporated into board membership criteria for nominees. Each of the nine Board
members has ESG experience; three of the nine have significant ESG experience.

Primary reason for no
Explain why your organization does not have at least one board
board-level competence member with competence on climate-related issues and any
on climate-related issues plans to address board-level competence in the future<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C1.2(C1.2) Provide the highest management-level position(s) or committee(s) with responsibility for climate-related issues.
Position or committee
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing major capital and/or operational expenditures related to low-carbon products or services (including R&D)
Managing climate-related acquisitions, mergers, and divestitures
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Setting climate-related corporate targets
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Managing public policy engagement that may impact the climate
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
CEO reporting line
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Annually
Please explain
The CEO supports and provides leadership in support of enterprise climate-related goals, targets, performance, and mitigation.
Position or committee
CDP

Page 3 of 68

General Counsel
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing annual budgets for climate mitigation activities
Managing major capital and/or operational expenditures related to low-carbon products or services (including R&D)
Managing climate-related acquisitions, mergers, and divestitures
Developing a climate transition plan
Implementing a climate transition plan
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Conducting climate-related scenario analysis
Setting climate-related corporate targets
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities
Managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
Other, please specify (Legal/Risk reporting line)
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Annually
Please explain
General Counsel (SVP): Executive officer responsible for Fortive's Sustainability Program oversight and progress, as well as EHS and Risk Management. Climate changerelated matters are in-scope of the Sustainability Program and include Fortive's new 2029 goal to reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions by 50% from 2019 levels.
The General Counsel reports to the full Board and to the Nominating and Governance Committee about Sustainability (ESG) Program disclosures, targets, and strategic
initiatives on an annual basis, and semi-annually, respectively, or more frequently, as needed. The General Counsel also reports to the Board about EHS compliancematters and Risk Management, on an annual basis or more frequently as needed.
Position or committee
Environment/ Sustainability manager
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Managing climate-related acquisitions, mergers, and divestitures
Developing a climate transition plan
Implementing a climate transition plan
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Conducting climate-related scenario analysis
Setting climate-related corporate targets
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Managing public policy engagement that may impact the climate
Managing value chain engagement on climate-related issues
Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
Corporate Sustainability/CSR reporting line
Frequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Annually
Please explain
The Senior Director of Sustainability supports the General Counsel with briefings and updates to the Board.
Position or committee
Other, please specify (ESG Disclosure Task Force)
Climate-related responsibilities of this position
Developing a climate transition plan
Implementing a climate transition plan
Integrating climate-related issues into the strategy
Monitoring progress against climate-related corporate targets
Managing public policy engagement that may impact the climate
Assessing climate-related risks and opportunities
Managing climate-related risks and opportunities
Coverage of responsibilities<Not Applicable>
Reporting line
Please selectFrequency of reporting to the board on climate-related issues via this reporting line
Annually
Please explain
ESG Disclosure Task Force: Cross-functional committee comprised of Sustainability, Legal, and Accounting leaders. Focus includes:- ESG Disclosure Governance- ESG Disclosure Strategy- ESG Disclosure Execution
ESG Disclosures are included with the annual Sustainability update to the Nominating & Governance committee.

CDP

Page 4 of 68

C1.3(C1.3) Do you provide incentives for the management of climate-related issues, including the attainment of targets?
Provide incentives forthe management ofclimate-related issues
Row Yes1

Comment

On an annual basis, the Compensation Committee establishes performance goals for each executive officer, with goals aligned to each executive officer’s scope of responsibility insupport of the Company’s overall strategic initiatives. Annual executive officer incentive compensation for the corresponding fiscal year accounts for the individual’s execution
against his or her personal performance goals and the company's overall performance.
Additionally, other leaders whose scope of responsibility includes climate have performance goals. Their performance to these goals impacts compensation (i.e., bonus,
promotions, etc.).

C1.3a

CDP

Page 5 of 68

(C1.3a) Provide further details on the incentives provided for the management of climate-related issues (do not include the names of individuals).
Entitled to incentive
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)Type of incentive
Monetary reward
Incentive(s)Bonus - % of salary
Performance indicator(s)Shareholder approval of climate transition plan
Achievement of a climate-related target
Incentive plan(s) this incentive is linked to
Both Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Plan
Further details of incentive(s)The incentive is a composite performance factor/personal performance factor.
Explain how this incentive contributes to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
A percentage of the CEO's annual incentive compensation is determined by personal performance factors. While the financial factors are determined by the Company’s
consolidated financial results, the personal performance factor structure allows the flexibility to establish goals that are applicable to the specific executive officer.
Entitled to incentive
General Counsel
Type of incentive
Monetary reward
Incentive(s)Bonus - % of salary
Performance indicator(s)Board approval of climate transition plan
Progress towards a climate-related target
Achievement of a climate-related target
Other (please specify) (Integration of Sustainability strategy into overall business strategy)
Incentive plan(s) this incentive is linked to
Both Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Plan
Further details of incentive(s)The incentive is a composite performance factor/personal performance factor
Explain how this incentive contributes to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
A percentage of the General Counsel's annual incentive compensation is determined by personal performance factors. While the financial factors are determined by theCompany’s consolidated financial results, the personal performance factor structure allows the flexibility to establish goals that are applicable to the specific executive
officer.
Entitled to incentive
Environment/Sustainability manager
Type of incentive
Monetary reward
Incentive(s)Bonus - % of salary
Performance indicator(s)Board approval of climate transition plan
Shareholder approval of climate transition plan
Progress towards a climate-related target
Achievement of a climate-related target
Other (please specify) (Sustainability strategy (quality and integration across the business))
Incentive plan(s) this incentive is linked to
Both Short-Term and Long-Term Incentive Plan
Further details of incentive(s)The incentive is a composite performance factor/personal performance factor.
Explain how this incentive contributes to the implementation of your organization’s climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
A percentage of the Senior Director of Sustainability's annual incentive compensation is determined by personal performance factors. While the financial factors are
determined by the Company’s consolidated financial results, the personal performance factor structure reflect establish goals that are applicable to the scope of
responsibility.

C2. Risks and opportunities

C2.1

CDP

Page 6 of 68

(C2.1) Does your organization have a process for identifying, assessing, and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities?
Yes

C2.1a
(C2.1a) How does your organization define short-, medium- and long-term time horizons?
From (years)

To (years)

Short-term

02Medium-term

25Long-term

5

10Comment

C2.1b
(C2.1b) How does your organization define substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Fortive is comprised of 17 operating companies (OpCos) that span multiple industries, across three operating segments. The definition of substantive financial or strategic
impact varies by OpCo and is directly influenced by the OpCo's business, markets, and industry.

C2.2(C2.2) Describe your process(es) for identifying, assessing and responding to climate-related risks and opportunities.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Upstream
Downstream
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Annually
Time horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-termLong-term
Description of process
Fortive identifies, assesses and responds to climate-related risks through our Risk Assessment Process (RAP), within the enterprise risk management program (ERM).
Through the annual RAP, business and functional leaders evaluate and identify the risks inherent in their operations on topics including: International dynamics; Human
resources; Regulatory and industry standards; Finance and accounting compliance; Business Continuity, Product safety and security; Sales and marketing; Data protection
and cybersecurity; General and internet technology; Environmental, Health and Safety; Sustainability, Physical Assets and Natural Disasters; Supply Chain, and ClimateRelated Risks.
RAP is conducted via a bottom-up and top-down approach on a segment and operating company level and functional level. Through RAP, operating companies identify andanalyze risks from both probability and magnitude of impact perspectives. Each risk is required to have a documented countermeasure(s) and progress is continuously
monitored and actioned. These risks are entered into individual risk matrix profiles, which are reviewed by the Segment CEOs. Results are reported to senior management
and the Risk Committee and reported to the Board.
The RAP outcome informs business decisions and investments related to talent management, real estate, infrastructure, regulatory compliance, supplier and commodity
sourcing, EHS programs, and climate change adaptation and mitigation.
The Fortive Risk Committee reviews and develops the Fortive-level risk assessment based on these company prioritizations, combined with broader corporate-level risks.
The Risk Committee is led by Fortive's General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer; the General Counsel reports the results to the Board of Directors annually, with our
audit committee overseeing our Enterprise Risk Management process.
Fortive’s ESG strategy and progress is routinely reviewed with the Board as they maintain oversight with respect to reporting and disclosure. The strategy is evaluatedusing several factors, including identification and responsiveness to business risks and opportunities. While climate-related risks are relevant to our business, we also see
significant opportunities. Fortive's products and service offerings help customers improve energy efficiency, carbon reduction, social benefits, and other impacts associatedwith climate change.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
More than once a year
Time horizon(s) covered

CDP

Page 7 of 68

Short-term
Medium-term
Description of process
To quantify and drive continuous improvement, our operating companies assess the EHS Risk level at each of our EHS significant sites and report an EHS Risk Score on asemi-annual basis. Fortive defines sites as EHS Significant if they have 50 and more employees and/or any manufacturing, light assembly or laboratory operations.
Fortive's EHS significant sites comprise approximately 70% of our real estate footprint. The EHS Risk Score is a Fortive standard metric comprising EHS performance
criteria, organized into five major categories:i) Safety Risks, ii) Environmental Risks, iii) Sustainability, iv) Leadership Involvement, and v) Metrics.
Our goal is to reduce the average EHS Risk Score across the company by implementing EHS and Sustainability programs and initiatives that are impactful and relevant toour operating environments.
Value chain stage(s) covered
Direct operations
Upstream
Risk management process
Integrated into multi-disciplinary company-wide risk management process
Frequency of assessment
Every three years or moreTime horizon(s) covered
Short-term
Medium-term
Description of process
We recognize the significant impact that suppliers could have on our business and with our global presence, the planet and natural resources. Fortive suppliers are required
to affirmatively commit to the standards outlined in our Supplier Code of Conduct (available in 22 languages). Sustainability-related questions are included in the supplierquestionnaire and are required to be completed by all suppliers. In conjunction with the questionnaire update, we train our internal auditors to ensure quality andconsistency.
Fortive's Supplier Code of Conduct includes specific language on human rights and combating modern slavery. We also improved alignment with the International Labour
Organization (ILO) to create consistency among our suppliers and peers. Our impact is seen through our Human Rights Risk Management and related Supplier Audit
Program.
Through the Supplier Code, Supplier Audit Program, and Supplier Assessment, we deploy actions including briefings with C-Suite executives and senior Operations andProcurement leaders and e-learning modules to inform employees on updates and changes to policies and procedures such as environmental related permits for theoperations they manage.

C2.2a

CDP

Page 8 of 68

(C2.2a) Which risk types are considered in your organization's climate-related risk assessments?
Relevance Please explain&
inclusion
Current
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Fortive's Risk Assessment Process (RAP) and EHS Risk Score include categories to account for current regulations in their risk registers. Through the RAP, Fortive and its operatingcompanies evaluate regulatory and compliance risks, including environmental regulations, and the management of these risks based on severity and probability. Fortive's EHS LeadershipCouncil and EHS professionals across the company monitor current and emerging EHS regulations, including climate- and environmental regulations. Our EHS Significant Sites are
required to complete a semi-annual risk assessment to evaluate their relative EHS Risk, including sustainability, occupational health, safety, and environmental compliance, leading EHS
metrics and public/reputational risks, among others.
As a global company with operations that cross numerous industries, Fortive is subject to a range of environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws and regulations
requires operating and capital investments. For example, Fortive has significant operations across the European Union, Australia and California where climate-related regulations may be
applicable. For example, we monitor requirements such as carbon pricing, the EU Taxonomy, CSRD, proposed CS3D, California's State Assembly Bill 32, Low Carbon Fuel Standard andSustainable Transportation Planning for applicability to our business and the industries and customers we serve.
Fortive uses Datamaran(R), an AI-powered materiality and regulatory monitoring platform, to evaluate material issues in real-time. Relevant updates are integrated into meetings regarding
risk assessment with internal stakeholders, including the Risk Management team, the EHS Leadership Council, Investor Relations, Compliance, and the Sustainability team.

Emerging
regulation

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Fortive's Risk Assessment Process (RAP) and EHS Risk Score include categories to account for emerging regulations in their risk registers. Emerging environmental risks are evaluated aspart of the regulatory & compliance and physical asset and natural disaster assessments, based on severity and probability. Fortive's EHS Leadership Council and EHS professionals
across the company monitor current and emerging EHS regulations, including climate- and environmental regulations. The EHS Risk Score is conducted semi-annually at our significant
operations to evaluate their relative EHS Risk, including management to address existing and emerging regulations.
Our operating companies monitor emerging regulations and the potential impacts on our customers. For example, emerging regulations for end producer responsibility (EPR) underscores
the importance of our product end-of-life management processes. Increasingly, municipalities and states across the U.S. and Europe are increasing the stringency of waste management
regulations to reduce landfill disposal due to the land use, emissions and other environmental impacts.
Fortive uses Datamaran(R), an AI-powered materiality and regulatory monitoring platform, to evaluate material issues in real-time. Relevant updates are integrated into meetings regarding
risk assessment with internal stakeholders, including the Risk Management team, the EHS Leadership Council, Investor Relations, Compliance, and the Sustainability team.

Technology Relevant,alwaysincluded

Fortive's products and services help our customers accelerate progress toward a sustainable future and we recognize that technology is a critical pathway to progress. Fortive's operatingcompanies conduct peer benchmarks and market assessments to understand and stay ahead of current technologies and trends. The climate-related impacts of technology are moreindirect than direct, as we operate primarily in the business-to-business space. However, we monitor and are proactive in our cybersecurity policies and information technology practices toensure the safety and security of our operations and our customers. The role that many of our products and services play in operating and managing critical infrastructure makes ourcontribution to climate-related risks and opportunities all the more critical. For example, several of our operating companies' sensors are used in critical infrastructure including electrical
grid infrastructure and public water services. Security of these devices is critical for sustainable management of these limited resources.

Legal

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Fortive's Risk Assessment Process (RAP) and EHS Risk Score include categories to account for applicable legal actions in their risk registers.

Relevant,
alwaysincluded

Given the diversity of Fortive operating companies, each operating company evaluates risks associated with their industry and market. Risks and opportunities are reflected in each
operating company's strategic plan. For example, Intelex is a leading provider of EHS&Q and Sustainability software applications, with an expanding market share, increasing competitionin the adoption of organizational management systems to account for, quantify and manage climate-related impacts and GHG inventory management and reporting is a key factor for our
ESG-related businesses.

Reputation Relevant,alwaysincluded

Fortive's Risk Assessment Process (RAP) includes a category to account for reputational and/or community relations risks. The Investor Relations team also monitors risks that are
revealed and/or explored via engagement with investors. Fortive is committed to sustainable performance and through environmental stewardship, corporate citizenship, inclusion, diversity& equity (ID&E), and high standards of ethics, business conduct and corporate governance.
Fortive's Values are foundational to our culture and drive how we conduct our business and engagement with customers, employees, suppliers and the communities where we live andoperate. Our reputation is influenced by the real and perceived impacts which directly impacts our ability to attract and retain diverse top talent. Stakeholders from investors to prospective
employees evaluate Fortive's commitments, performance and innovation associated with climate change-related matters, including our GHG reduction goal and our strategy for
performance and integration across the business.

AcutephysicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Fortive's Risk Assessment Process (RAP) program includes assessment of acute physical risks in the risk register and management process. Each operating company is required toassess risks associated with physical assets and natural disasters, for example, physical asset/building system reliability and increased operational costs (e.g., increased costs fromincreased peak demands on energy consumption, energy efficiency investments), business continuity planning and exposure(s) to a lack of contingency planning for natural disasters,
terrorism, workplace violence or malicious acts, or IT disaster/non-recovery. We have significant operations located in regions that are subject to risks associated with the frequency andintensity of natural disasters and storm events, in particular across Asia, the Americas and Africa.

Chronic
physicalRelevant,
alwaysincluded

Fortive's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program includes assessment of chronic physical risks in their risk registers and management process. Each operating company is required
to assess risks associated with physical assets and natural disasters, for example, physical asset/building system reliability and increased operational costs (e.g., increasing costs due toenergy as resource scarcity is reflected in market prices). We have significant operations in geographic locations that are experiencing and/or at-risk of sustained increases in averagetemperatures, reduced water availability, and potential strains on infrastructure services which will increase operational costs over the medium- and long-term, including continental Asia,
Australia and South Asia, the Americas and Africa.

MarketThere were no active or pending climate-related legal claims in the reporting period. Through Fortive's Sustainability team and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), we regularly evaluate
regulatory and compliance requirements (real and emerging), including current or pending climate-related legal actions.

C2.3(C2.3) Have you identified any inherent climate-related risks with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.3a
(C2.3a) Provide details of risks identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Risk 1
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Emerging regulation

Carbon pricing mechanisms

Primary potential financial impact
Increased indirect (operating) costs
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification
CDP

Page 9 of 68

<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
A carbon price on GHG emissions could result in increased compliance costs for our businesses. Our businesses’ sales and operations are subject to risks associated withchanges in laws, regulators and policies, including carbon emission regulations and energy efficiency and design regulations. Failure to comply with applicable regulations
could result in monetary and non-monetary penalties as well as potential damage to our reputation. For example, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in the
EU and other emerging carbon tax /ETS schemes will increase the cost of doing business. Our current EU operations account for approximately 7.5% of Fortive's total
Scope 1 and 2 emissions. Organic and acquisition growth present additional risk for our operating companies headquartered and/or operating in the EU.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
More likely than not
Magnitude of impact
Low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
24000
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
3290000
Explanation of financial impact figure
A carbon price between $6 (minimum) and $50* (maximum) per metric ton over the next 5-10 years, conservatively applied to Fortive's GHG emissions, could result in
additional operating costs between $24k annually (EU only at $6/MCTO2e) to $3.2M annually (all FTV @ $50/MTCO2e). At $50/MTCO2e, the financial impact is less than
0.1% of Fortive's annual revenue in 2022.
*Source: proposed carbon price during the Obama administration (U.S.)
Cost of response to risk
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Fortive monitors regulatory updates and evaluates risks for increased costs in risk areas that include climate legislation, regulations and taxes. We implement control
measures including supplier diversification, utility contract terms and agreements, and operational efficiency initiatives to mitigate operational cost increases.
Comment
Regulatory monitoring, supply chain management, and internal controls are standard costs of business.
Identifier
Risk 2
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Acute physical

Other, please specify (Hurricanes, Wildfires, Tornadoes, Cold Wave/Frost)

Primary potential financial impact
Increased indirect (operating) costs
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
Extreme weather events could result in physical damage to our sites and other assets, disrupting business operations and supply chain, resulting in production delays,
temporary reduction of our production capacity, and/or deferred or lost revenue, among other impacts. Our global real estate portfolio could be impacted by a variety of
weather events like hurricanes, wildfires, tornadoes, and droughts. We track events and enact crisis management and relief for at-risk sites during extreme weather events.
Our EHS, Facilities and Human Resources teams have disaster preparedness and business continuity standard work, as well as rapid response protocols, to ensure thehealth and safety of our employees first and foremost. These protocols ensure continued operations in a safe and efficient manner.
In 2022, unique events including wildfires in the U.S. Southwest and Pacific Northwest impacted our operating companies, in some cases requiring site closures spanningdays. Operational risks are projected to occur more frequently as climate change accelerates.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
About as likely as not
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
50000
CDP

Page 10 of 68

Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
95000000
Explanation of financial impact figure
As acute climate change-related events increase in likelihood, there is a greater probability for events that have a financial impact on the business. Remediation activities
like smoke removal, flood response, and grid outages could incur costs at the lower bound of financial impact of $50,000. A less likely impact of acute climate changerelated events would necessitate a rebuild of a major North American EHS significant site with manufacturing, service or assembly operations, if completely destroyed by
an extreme weather event, such as a wildfire or hurricane, could cost up to $95 million to the company. All operating company sites are insured for physical risks andbusiness interruption (revenue) losses, so this figure represents the maximum unmitigated risk.
Cost of response to risk
0
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Currently, Fortive has resources and standard work in place to identify, mitigate and respond to physical risks. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the business.
The potential exposure associated with physical changes is currently assessed and managed through Fortive’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program, associatedRisk Assessment Process (RAP), and Risk Transfer & Financing. Fortive Corporation works closely with internal and external teams to regularly evaluate, identify andimprove onsite risks and processes. Fortive facilities undergo third party site engineering assessments at varying cadences based on site total insurable value (TIV). In
addition, Fortive sites are assigned EHS risk scores which include various criteria and undergo regular internal and external audits, scheduled and unscheduled. Employee
safety, business continuity, and disaster response are also key focus areas in our risk management and risk mitigation efforts. Although a comprehensive climate changerelated impact assessment of at some sites remains to be conducted, Fortive remains committed to continuous improvement towards our operations, real estate portfolio,
standard work and site-related risk assessments.
Comment
Identifier
Risk 3
Where in the value chain does the risk driver occur?
Direct operations
Risk type & Primary climate-related risk driver
Emerging regulation

Enhanced emissions-reporting obligations

Primary potential financial impact
Decreased access to capital
Climate risk type mapped to traditional financial services industry risk classification<Not Applicable>
Company-specific description
Fortive has operations in over 50 countries, including in the EU and Asia-Pacific region where emissions reporting requirements are increasing in scope and rigor. An
incomplete or a lack of reporting to relevant agencies or stock exchanges requiring increased disclosure from companies with operations in these regions could negatively
impact Fortive's profile among banks and insurance providers. Proposed rulings, like the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's rulemaking proposal "TheEnhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors" have ambitious timelines and phase-in periods that are subject to strict disclosure
thresholds for the financial impacts of climate-related risks on financial statements. This has financial risk implications both from an infrastructure and readiness perspective
and the potential for penalties and litigation for those companies not prepared in a short duration.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
Low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
15000
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
4000000
Explanation of financial impact figure
The financial impact is difficult to calculate or even estimate due to the uncertainty of when the regulations may go into effect and definitive actions by institutions andagencies. It is certain that added compliance costs will exceed the proposed $15,000 per year cited by the SEC proposal.
If the regulations go into effect, we anticipate the need for a dedicated full-time FTE at our largest operating companies and consulting support, which is conservatively
estimated to increase operating costs by $1M annually for the first 1-4 years.
Cost of response to risk
1000000
Description of response and explanation of cost calculation
Fortive continues to advance our reporting and compliance efforts in anticipation of emerging climate related regulations through the combined efforts of the Sustainability
team, Climate Disclosure Task Force, and Third-Party Verification Support. Fortive anticipates added annual operating expenses to persist to address these needs.
If the regulations go into effect, we anticipate the need for a dedicated full-time FTE at our largest operating companies and consulting support, which is conservatively
estimated to increase operating costs by $1M annually for the first 1-4 years.
Comment
This is the minimum cost for response to applicable climate-related regulations.
CDP

Page 11 of 68

C2.4(C2.4) Have you identified any climate-related opportunities with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business?
Yes

C2.4a
(C2.4a) Provide details of opportunities identified with the potential to have a substantive financial or strategic impact on your business.
Identifier
Opp1
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Direct operations
Opportunity type
Resource efficiency
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Other, please specify (Energy use reduction and energy efficiency investments)
Primary potential financial impact
Reduced direct costs
Company-specific description
In 2022, Fortive announced our commitment to reduce Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions across at least 95% of our real estate footprint by 2029, from 2019 levels. To achievethat target, operating companies are implementing emissions-reduction projects that will reduce energy use/improve energy efficiency. In most cases, these projects savemoney AND energy. For example, in 2022, operating companies submitted energy efficiency projects that had the potential to reduce GHG emissions by over 4,000
MTCO2e.
Time horizon
Short-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
Low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
0
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
126000Explanation of financial impact figure
This financial impact figure reflects the estimated annual *savings* from approved energy efficiency project investments in 2022.
Cost to realize opportunity
2600000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Our strategy to reduce GHG emissions is multi-faceted and grounded in the Fortive Business System (FBS). One fundamental aspect of our strategy is to identify andimplement energy use reduction/avoidance and/or energy efficiency projects to drive our operational GHG emissions down. We leverage kaizen, an FBS-based process toreview in-depth, the sources of energy use and opportunities for efficiency improvement, energy use avoidance and reduction. We deploy energy kaizens at scale, while
also evaluating renewable energy and shared service opportunities to improve operational efficiency at scale.
Fortive applies a balanced perspective for investing in GHG emissions reduction projects: we evaluate projects based on their GHG emissions reduction and their financial
ROI; we do support projects that have a material GHG reduction even if the pure financial ROI does not fulfil traditional criteria.
The $2.6M cost to realize the opportunity reflects the total cost if every submitted project was approved.
Comment
Identifier
Opp2
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development of climate adaptation, resilience and insurance risk solutions

CDP

Page 12 of 68

Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific descriptionMore than 60% of Fortive's 2022 revenue was generated from products & services that enable sustainability-related impacts, for example: energy and carbon reduction,water savings, waste avoidance, patient health and safety, and workplace health and safety.
For example: Fluke offers a suite of products that enable customers to reduce and avoid emissions, including (but not limited to):- Thermal imaging: handheld thermal cameras for preventive maintenance, inspections and frontline troubleshooting of electrical systems,- Thermal calibration: tools that identify and correct errors in temperature measurement to establish and maintain desired set points in process heating and coolingapplications/HVAC,- Industrial imaging: Enable customers to locate air, gas and vacuum leaks in compressed air systems (compressed air leaks are a leading source of waste energy use inindustrial operations (>6% of total energy consumed, on average),- Power standards: Calibrating equipment used to manage reliability of power distribution. and.
- Fluke battery testers: Tools and equipment to test efficiency of batteries, including batteries associated with solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays, to discharge efficiency andmaximize charging cycles.
Time horizon
Medium-term
Likelihood
Very likely
Magnitude of impact
Medium-low
Are you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
Explanation of financial impact figure
Fortive developed a methodology to qualify products and services as enabling sustainability impacts (when in use) and capture revenue on a quarterly basis. Thismethodology now allows Fortive businesses to optimally strategize their existing offerings in these spaces with robust data analytics, as well as target new R&D
opportunities and market expansion.
Cost to realize opportunity
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Fluke, and other Fortive operating companies, are already innovating for the energy and emission spaces and anticipate continued growth in the market for hardware andsoftware enabled solutions that advance the capabilities of industrial operations towards optimized energy efficiency and decarbonization. These Fortive businesses willcontinue to innovate and develop solutions to meet the increased demand, enabling customers to meet their climate goals, reduce resource consumption like water, and in
the process save money by realizing more efficient operations. These businesses are also positioned to enable the expansion of renewable energy, at scale.
Comment
Identifier
Opp3
Where in the value chain does the opportunity occur?
Downstream
Opportunity type
Products and services
Primary climate-related opportunity driver
Development of new products or services through R&D and innovation
Primary potential financial impact
Increased revenues resulting from increased demand for products and services
Company-specific description
Hengstler-Dynapar develops and builds encoders that are used in renewable industries to support wind turbine operations and solar array functionality.
Hengstler-Dynapar HDN58 Magnetic Contactless Encoders allow for solar panels to align with the passing sun to optimize solar power generation. In the United States, thescaling of solar power affords many opportunities for revenue generation for initial install and continued servicing.
The Slim Tach 56 Magnetic Encoder positions wind turbine pitch motors to optimal blade angle to provide the most efficient turbine operation across varied environmental
conditions. The Slim Tach 56 also addresses Electro-Magnetic Interference (EMI) when the brake mechanism is applied, exhibiting a high resistance to such EMI,
minimizing impact to operations.
Time horizon
Long-term
Likelihood
Virtually certain
Magnitude of impact
MediumAre you able to provide a potential financial impact figure?
Yes, an estimated range
Potential financial impact figure (currency)
CDP

Page 13 of 68

<Not Applicable>
Potential financial impact figure – minimum (currency)
525300000
Potential financial impact figure – maximum (currency)
1514700000
Explanation of financial impact figure
Fortive developed a methodology to qualify products and services as enabling sustainability impacts (when in use) and capture revenue on a quarterly basis.
The $525M minimum reflects the 2022 sustainability-related revenue from applicable product lines within the Precision Technologies segment that support renewablerevenue.
The $1.5B reflects 1% of the projected 2030 global wind energy market, a key market for future growth across Fortive's portfolio (assumes a modest market share).
Source: Spherical Insights, 23-March-2023
Cost to realize opportunity
80300000
Strategy to realize opportunity and explanation of cost calculation
Hengstler-Dynapar, and other Fortive businesses, are already innovating for the energy and emission spaces and anticipate continued growth in the market for hardware
and software enabled solutions that advance the capabilities of industrial operations towards optimized energy efficiency and decarbonization. These Fortive businesses
will continue to innovate and develop solutions to meet the increased demand, enabling customers to meet their climate goals, reduce resource consumption like water, andin the process save money by realizing more efficient operations. These Fortive businesses are also positioned to enable the expansion of renewable energy, at scale.
Hengstler-Dynapar will continue to realize sales opportunities with their Heavy-Duty Magnetic Encoders and Vacuum Contactor offerings, providing significant growth
opportunities as industry needs dictate greater customization and higher reliability of components.
$80M reflects ~20% of Fortive's R&D investments in 2022, an estimated proportion of total R&D investments based on market growth potential (Source: 2022 10-K, p. 37).
Comment

C3. Business Strategy

C3.1(C3.1) Does your organization’s strategy include a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world?
Row 1
Climate transition planNo, but our strategy has been influenced by climate-related risks and opportunities, and we are developing a climate transition plan within two years
Publicly available climate transition plan
<Not Applicable>
Mechanism by which feedback is collected from shareholders on your climate transition plan
<Not Applicable>
Description of feedback mechanism<Not Applicable>
Frequency of feedback collection<Not Applicable>
Attach any relevant documents which detail your climate transition plan (optional)<Not Applicable>
Explain why your organization does not have a climate transition plan that aligns with a 1.5°C world and any plans to develop one in the future
In 2022, Fortive announced a 50% absolute Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions reduction target by 2029 that is aligned with the Science-based Targets Initiative (SBTi) guidance.
We continue to work to achieve alignment with TCFD and have taken initial steps, including: i) added climate change experience to the skills matrix for members of theBoard Nominating and Governance Committee, ii) incorporated climate-related performance goals for leaders and management with relevant responsibilities, iii) reviewed
and refined the risks and opportunities for operating companies within the Risk Assessment Process (RAP) to capture short- and long-term physical and transition risks, iv)
expanded our Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting to include over 95% of our real estate footprint, aligned with the Science Based Target initiative (SBTi)
guidance, and v) announced our commitment to reduce water use at our major operations by 2029, from 2022 levels.
Additional details will become available as we continue to develop our processes and controls and advance towards full alignment.
Explain why climate-related risks and opportunities have not influenced your strategy<Not Applicable>

C3.2

CDP

Page 14 of 68

(C3.2) Does your organization use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its strategy?
Use of climate-related scenario analysis Primary reason why your organization does not use Explain why your organization does not use climate-related scenario analysis to inform its
to inform strategy
climate-related scenario analysis to inform its
strategy and any plans to use it in the future
strategy
Row No, but we anticipate using qualitative
Important but not an immediate priority
1
and/or quantitative analysis in the next two
years

In 2022 we announced a new, more ambitious goal to achieve a 50% absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2
GHG emissions reduction target by 2029, from 2019 levels. This new goal is aligned with SBTi guidance.
We disclose our TCFD progress in the Appendix of our annual Sustainability report, including our intent to
conduct climate-related scenario analyses within our 3-year roadmap to inform our strategy.

C3.3(C3.3) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your strategy.
Have climate-related Description of influencerisks andopportunities
influenced yourstrategy in this area?
Products
andservices

Yes

In 2022, we deployed a methodology to qualify products andservices that enable Sustainability-related outcomes directly or
through customer applications. The outcome is two-fold:1) we established a standardized process across Fortive, that is now integrated into quarterly financial reporting; AND2) we determined that approximately 60% of Fortive’s 2022 revenue was generated from sustainability-enabling products and services. The products align with the United
Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs).
By calculating a baseline, we have a start line from which to drive continuous improvement and measure our growth. Fortive's aspirations to improve the % revenue influences
strategy - at the enterprise and operating company levels.
Our customers count on Fortive’s innovative products and services to accelerate progress toward these ambitious, world-shaping goals. We partner with our customers toenable safer workplaces and medical environments, renewable energy solutions, and smarter use of precious natural resources. Climate-related risks and opportunities
accelerate the demand and our innovative culture to develop and enhance products and services to realize the impacts our products enable, at scale.

Supplychain
and/orvalue
chain

Evaluation in progress Fortive is undergoing a comprehensive assessment of our Scope 3 emissions, including purchased goods and services, transportation and distribution and other supplierrelated value chain intersections. In 2022, we completed the assessment of upstream Scope 3 categories and continue to work on downstream Scope 3 category analysis.

Investment Yes
in R&DThe Fortive procurement team constantly evaluates service providers to augment and advance our responsible sourcing efforts and supply chain resiliency to include climaterelated risks and opportunities.
More than 60% of Fortive's revenue was derived from sustainability-related products & services. This is the keystone of our Sustainability Value Proposition, and operatingcompanies account for climate-related risks and opportunities by prioritizing R&D investments that reflect known and anticipated customer needs.
Our proprietary Lean Portfolio Management (LPM) tool drives teams to make strategic portfolio investment decisions and carry out innovative growth programs. Through thisprocess, we solicit customer input and leverage our stakeholders’ knowledge of markets and emerging technologies to advance and support our products already in the market,
or to phase out obsolete products and services to make way for new innovations. The LPM process helps Fortive and our operating companies deliver greater returns on
research and development and accelerate innovation, positioning businesses for thoughtful and sustainable R&D efforts and product solutions.
Fortive’s Growth Accelerator is a powerful and proven FBS toolset
for generating and pursuing breakthrough innovation that drives an increase in our organic growth. Growth Accelerator provides the space for our employees to solve customer
problems by developing inventive solutions and quickly testing uncertainties and risks to enable faster learning and decision making. Coupling the Growth Accelerator with Lean
Portfolio Management enables our businesses to bring high quality products to market at a faster pace. This is true for all Fortive products and services, including climaterelated products and services.

Operations Yes

Through the Enterprise Risk Management, EHS Risk Score and energy kaizen programs, we account for climate change-related risk and energy use reduction opportunities
and energy efficiency strategies. Climate change-related risks are identified through the ERM and the EHS Risk Score. The energy kaizen program is a proactive process, used
to identify energy efficiency and carbon reduction opportunities at the site and operational level.

C3.4(C3.4) Describe where and how climate-related risks and opportunities have influenced your financial planning.
Financialplanning
elements thathave been
influenced
Row Revenues
1
Indirect costs
Capital allocation
Acquisitions anddivestments

Description of influence

Indirect costs: climate-related increases in global average temperatures presents risk to operational costs (i.e., indirect costs) due to increased demand for energy to maintain and manage
workplace temperatures. For example, in 2022 wildfires across the western United States impacted many of our employees and certain site operations. There were increased costs
associated with closing down and reopening the facility, driven by lost productivity and increased HVAC operations to ensure indoor air quality could be returned to operational-required
levels.
Capital allocation: We invest in emissions reduction projects to reduce energy use/improve energy efficiency to reduce GHG emissions and indirect costs. Dedicated capital allocation
enables operating companies to implement energy efficiency and renewable energy projects.
Revenues: In 2022, we deployed a methodology to qualify products andservices that enable Sustainability-related outcomes directly or
through customer applications. Understanding our baseline of revenue associated with sustainability-related products and services positions us to establish aspirational targets to drive
continuous improvement.
Acquisitions and divestments: Several of Fortive’s own products and services enable us to test and implement a range of services to execute our own Sustainability initiatives andadvance our performance. Our business strategy and portfolio of companies continue to evolve towards more software-based (vs. manufacturing) businesses. With this transition, thecarbon intensity of our operations is decreasing and shifting more toward indirect emissions.

C3.5
CDP

Page 15 of 68

(C3.5) In your organization’s financial accounting, do you identify spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climate transition?

Row
1

Identification of spending/revenue that is aligned with your organization’s climatetransition

Indicate the level at which you identify the alignment of your spending/revenue with a sustainable financetaxonomyNo, but we plan to in the next two years<Not Applicable>

C4. Targets and performance

C4.1(C4.1) Did you have an emissions target that was active in the reporting year?
Absolute target

C4.1a(C4.1a) Provide details of your absolute emissions target(s) and progress made against those targets.
Target reference number
Abs 1
Is this a science-based target?
Yes, we consider this a science-based target, and we have committed to seek validation of this target by the Science Based Targets initiative in the next two years
Target ambition
1.5°C aligned
Year target was set
2022
Target coverage
Other, please specify (95-100% of our operational footprint)
Scope(s)Scope 1
Scope 2
Scope 2 accounting method
Market-based
Scope 3 category(ies)<Not Applicable>
Base year
2019
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
21071
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
44759
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
CDP

Page 16 of 68

Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e)
65830
Base year Scope 1 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 1
32
Base year Scope 2 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 2
68
Base year Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 1:
Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions covered by target as % of total base year
emissions in Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream
transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 5: Waste
generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel (metrictons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting(metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream
leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3,
Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 10:
Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 11: Use of soldproducts (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 12:
End-of-life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 13:
Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 17 of 68

Base year Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Category 15: Investments (metric tons
CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3, Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Base year total Scope 3 emissions covered by target as % of total base year emissions in Scope 3 (in all Scope 3 categories)<Not Applicable>
Base year emissions covered by target in all selected Scopes as % of total base year emissions in all selected Scopes
Target year
2029
Targeted reduction from base year (%)
50
Total emissions in target year covered by target in all selected Scopes (metric tons CO2e) [auto-calculated]
32915
Scope 1 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)
15428
Scope 2 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)35692
Scope 3, Category 1: Purchased goods and services emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 2: Capital goods emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 5: Waste generated in operations emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 6: Business travel emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 7: Employee commuting emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 8: Upstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 10: Processing of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 11: Use of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 13: Downstream leased assets emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 14: Franchises emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Category 15: Investments emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (upstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Scope 3, Other (downstream) emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total Scope 3 emissions in reporting year covered by target (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Total emissions in reporting year covered by target in all selected scopes (metric tons CO2e)
51120
Does this target cover any land-related emissions?
No, it does not cover any land-related emissions (e.g. non-FLAG SBT)
% of target achieved relative to base year [auto-calculated]
44.6908704238189

CDP

Page 18 of 68

Target status in reporting year
Underway
Please explain target coverage and identify any exclusions
No exclusions
Plan for achieving target, and progress made to the end of the reporting year
Our plans to achieve the target include: i) emissions reductions, ii) renewable energy, iii) operational improvements, and iv) organic gains from the increasing contribution ofrenewable energy to the electricity grid.
List the emissions reduction initiatives which contributed most to achieving this target<Not Applicable>

C4.2(C4.2) Did you have any other climate-related targets that were active in the reporting year?
No other climate-related targets

C4.3(C4.3) Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year? Note that this can include those in the planning and/or
implementation phases.
Yes

C4.3a
(C4.3a) Identify the total number of initiatives at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings.
Number of initiatives

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes CO2e (only for rows marked *)Under investigation

39

4098

To be implemented*

13

2130

Implementation commenced*

13

2130

Implemented*

13

2130

Not to be implemented

26

1968

C4.3b
(C4.3b) Provide details on the initiatives implemented in the reporting year in the table below.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Lighting

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
231
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
132097
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
225252
Payback period
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Interior and Exterior Lighting
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

CDP

Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC)

Page 19 of 68

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)983
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
210210Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
644389Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
HVAC projects offer a mixed payback period, depending on the nature of the project. In some cases, these reduce Scope 1 emissions due to refrigerant replacements; inother cases, they are larger-scale projects such as a more complete upgrade, in which case they have a higher payback period.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in production processes

Process optimization

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)415
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
77602
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
117000
Payback period
1-3 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Production cell merger and reconfiguration to optimize efficiencies.
Initiative category & Initiative type
Energy efficiency in buildings

Building Energy Management Systems (BEMS)

Estimated annual CO2e savings (metric tonnes CO2e)
256
Scope(s) or Scope 3 category(ies) where emissions savings occur
Scope 1
Scope 2 (location-based)
Scope 2 (market-based)
Voluntary/Mandatory
Voluntary
Annual monetary savings (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
47916
Investment required (unit currency – as specified in C0.4)
190000
Payback period
4-10 years
Estimated lifetime of the initiative
6-10 years
Comment
Air exchange rate reduction project
CDP

Page 20 of 68

C4.3c
(C4.3c) What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?
MethodComment

Dedicated budget for lowcarbon product R&D

Fortive invests in the development and modification of its products and services in response to actual or anticipated customer demands for solutions that help customers achieve theiremissions reduction goals. For example, across Fortive, our operating companies fund and staff testing laboratories for products and services that support lower carbon market
solutions (e.g., renewable energy, sensing technology) and our customers' carbon intensity. Where applicable, we apply those solutions to our own operations to drive performanceand emissions reductions.

Dedicated budget for energy Fortive is investing in emissions reduction projects to reduce our operational carbon emissions. This includes energy efficiency projects such as lighting upgrades, process
efficiency
improvements, equipment updates and retrofits and more. The funding for these projects is a dedicated budget, separate from standard CapEx funding and is allocated based on
impact to GHG emissions reductions.
Dedicated budget for otherFortive is investing in emissions reduction projects to reduce our operational carbon emissions. This includes infrastructure upgrades and improvements, gas recovery systems, andemissions reduction activities energy use avoidance. The funding for these projects is a dedicated budget, separate from standard CapEx funding and is allocated based on impact to GHG emissions reductions.
Other (Internal Metrics and
KPI, Incentives, Lower
Return on Investment (ROI)
specifications)

Fortive has developed internal GHG KPIs that are allocated to our highest-emitting operating companies, including in 2021. These KPIs drive accountability and action to reduce GHG
emissions. Through the dedicated budget, projects are reviewed and approved based on their impact to GHG emissions reductions.

C4.5(C4.5) Do you classify any of your existing goods and/or services as low-carbon products?
Yes

C4.5a
(C4.5a) Provide details of your products and/or services that you classify as low-carbon products.
Level of aggregation
Group of products or services
Taxonomy used to classify product(s) or service(s) as low-carbon
Other, please specify
Type of product(s) or service(s)Other

Other, please specify (Energy efficiency)

Description of product(s) or service(s)Fluke offers a suite of products that enable customers to reduce and avoid emissions, including (but not limited to):- Thermal imaging: handheld thermal cameras for preventive maintenance, inspections and frontline troubleshooting of electrical systems,- Thermal calibration: tools that identify and correct errors in temperature measurement to establish and maintain desired set points in process heating and coolingapplications/HVAC,- Industrial imaging: Enable customers to locate air, gas and vacuum leaks in compressed air systems (compressed air leaks are a leading source of waste energy use inindustrial operations (>6% of total energy consumed, on average),- Power standards: Calibrating equipment used to manage reliability of power distribution. and.
- Fluke battery testers: Tools and equipment to test efficiency of batteries, including batteries associated with solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays, to discharge efficiency andmaximize charging cycles.
Have you estimated the avoided emissions of this low-carbon product(s) or service(s)NoMethodology used to calculate avoided emissions<Not Applicable>
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the low-carbon product(s) or services(s)<Not Applicable>
Functional unit used
<Not Applicable>
Reference product/service or baseline scenario used
<Not Applicable>
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the reference product/service or baseline scenario<Not Applicable>
Estimated avoided emissions (metric tons CO2e per functional unit) compared to reference product/service or baseline scenario<Not Applicable>
Explain your calculation of avoided emissions, including any assumptions<Not Applicable>
Revenue generated from low-carbon product(s) or service(s) as % of total revenue in the reporting year
Level of aggregation
CDP

Page 21 of 68

Group of products or services
Taxonomy used to classify product(s) or service(s) as low-carbon
Other, please specify
Type of product(s) or service(s)Power

Other, please specify (Electrical Utilities)

Description of product(s) or service(s)Qualitrol provides a range of products that monitor electricity and power infrastructure to ensure stable, continuous operations by:- monitoring single parameters on a power transformer to maintain health and alarm on established thresholds- providing electrical utilities insight into the health of their assets to aid in better planning of resources, prolonging asset life, avoiding unplanned power outages, and avoid
environmental remediation incidents (fires and oil spills) due to catastrophic asset failure,- .diagnosing faults and power quality issues on the electrical grid when an unplanned power outages occur, andhelping electrical utilities to restore power quickly and safely while providing data to root cause the issue of the outage(s).
Have you estimated the avoided emissions of this low-carbon product(s) or service(s)NoMethodology used to calculate avoided emissions<Not Applicable>
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the low-carbon product(s) or services(s)<Not Applicable>
Functional unit used
<Not Applicable>
Reference product/service or baseline scenario used
<Not Applicable>
Life cycle stage(s) covered for the reference product/service or baseline scenario<Not Applicable>
Estimated avoided emissions (metric tons CO2e per functional unit) compared to reference product/service or baseline scenario<Not Applicable>
Explain your calculation of avoided emissions, including any assumptions<Not Applicable>
Revenue generated from low-carbon product(s) or service(s) as % of total revenue in the reporting year

C5. Emissions methodology

C5.1(C5.1) Is this your first year of reporting emissions data to CDP?
No

C5.1a
(C5.1a) Has your organization undergone any structural changes in the reporting year, or are any previous structural changes being accounted for in thisdisclosure of emissions data?
Row 1
Has there been a structural change?
No
Name of organization(s) acquired, divested from, or merged with<Not Applicable>
Details of structural change(s), including completion dates<Not Applicable>

C5.1b
(C5.1b) Has your emissions accounting methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition changed in the reporting year?
Change(s) in methodology,
boundary, and/or reporting year
definition?
Row Yes, a change in boundary
1

CDP

Details of methodology, boundary, and/or reporting year definition change(s)Change in Boundary: With the announcement of our 2029 absolute Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions reduction goal and alignment to the Science Based Targets Initiative(SBTI) guidance, we expanded our reporting boundary to at least 95% of our real estate footprint (an increase from the ~70% of our prior goal and reporting boundary).

Page 22 of 68

C5.1c
(C5.1c) Have your organization’s base year emissions and past years’ emissions been recalculated as a result of any changes or errors reported in C5.1a and/or
C5.1b?
Base year
recalculation
Row Yes1

Scope(s)recalculated

Base year emissions recalculation policy, including significance threshold

Scope 1
Due to the change in boundary (expanded to 95%+ of our real estate footprint from ~70% in prior years) AND the shift to a market based GHG reduction
Scope 2,target, we updated our accounting processes, consistent with The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
market-based

Past years’
recalculation
Yes

C5.2
(C5.2) Provide your base year and base year emissions.
Scope 1
Base year start
January 1 2019
Base year end
December 31 2019
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
21071
Comment
Consistent with the accounting methodology outlined in The Greenhouse Gas Protocol - A Corporate Accounting and Reporting standards, we updated the GHG inventory
to reflect current day Fortive operating companies back through the 2019 base year. We also revised historical data when and where inaccuracies were identified,exceeding the +/- 5% threshold for material change.
Scope 2 (location-based)
Base year start
January 1 2019
Base year end
December 31 2019
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)49479
Comment
Consistent with the accounting methodology outlined in The Greenhouse Gas Protocol - A Corporate Accounting and Reporting standards, we updated the GHG inventory
to reflect current day Fortive operating companies back through the 2019 base year. We also revised historical data when and where inaccuracies were identified,exceeding the +/- 5% threshold for material change.
Scope 2 (market-based)
Base year start
January 1 2019
Base year end
December 31 2019
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
44759
Comment
Scope 3 category 1: Purchased goods and services
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
199168Comment
Spend-based emissions calculation methodology

CDP

Page 23 of 68

Scope 3 category 2: Capital goods
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)112832
Comment
Spend-based emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3 category 3: Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
11757
Comment
Fuel-based emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3 category 4: Upstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
66523
Comment
Supplier-specific method and Spend-based method emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3 category 5: Waste generated in operations
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
2479
Comment
Waste-type-specific emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3 category 6: Business travel
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
11433
Comment
Spend-based and Distance-based emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3 category 7: Employee commuting
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
24100
Comment
Distance-based emissions calculation methodology

CDP

Page 24 of 68

Scope 3 category 8: Upstream leased assets
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
This category is not relevant because all leased assets are included in Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Scope 3 category 9: Downstream transportation and distribution
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
These emissions are included in Category 4 figure
Scope 3 category 10: Processing of sold products
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
This category is not relevant because Fortive does not produce intermediate products that require processing.
Scope 3 category 11: Use of sold products
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Relevant but not yet calculated
Scope 3 category 12: End of life treatment of sold products
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Relevant but not yet calculated
Scope 3 category 13: Downstream leased assets
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Not relevant, Fortive doesn't have downstream leased assets to report.

CDP

Page 25 of 68

Scope 3 category 14: Franchises
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Not relevant, Fortive does not have businesses operating with a franchise model.
Scope 3 category 15: Investments
Base year start
January 1 2022
Base year end
December 31 2022
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
3249
Comment
Investment-specific emissions calculation methodology
Scope 3: Other (upstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment
Scope 3: Other (downstream)
Base year start
Base year end
Base year emissions (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C5.3(C5.3) Select the name of the standard, protocol, or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate emissions.
The Climate Registry: General Reporting Protocol
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Scope 2 Guidance
The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard
US EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership: Direct Fugitive Emissions from Refrigeration, Air Conditioning, Fire Suppression, and Industrial Gases
US EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership: Indirect Emissions From Purchased Electricity
US EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership: Direct Emissions from Stationary Combustion Sources
US EPA Center for Corporate Climate Leadership: Direct Emissions from Mobile Combustion Sources

C6. Emissions data

C6.1

CDP

Page 26 of 68

(C6.1) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 1 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
15428
Start date
January 1 2022
End date
December 31 2022
Comment
Past year 1
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
13818
Start date
January 1 2021
End date
December 31 2021
Comment
Past year 2
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
19631
Start date
January 1 2020
End date
December 31 2020
Comment
Past year 3
Gross global Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
21071
Start date
January 1 2019
End date
December 31 2019
Comment

C6.2(C6.2) Describe your organization’s approach to reporting Scope 2 emissions.
Row 1​Scope 2, location-based​
We are reporting a Scope 2, location-based figure
Scope 2, market-based
We are reporting a Scope 2, market-based figure
Comment
We have expanded our methodology to incorporate both location-based and market-based figures.

C6.3

CDP

Page 27 of 68

(C6.3) What were your organization’s gross global Scope 2 emissions in metric tons CO2e?
Reporting year
Scope 2, location-based
42121
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
35692
Start date
January 1 2022
End date
December 31 2022
Comment
Past year 1
Scope 2, location-based
41947.3
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
38102
Start date
January 1 2021
End date
December 31 2021
Comment
Past year 2
Scope 2, location-based
45768
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
40055
Start date
January 1 2020
End date
December 31 2020
Comment
Past year 3
Scope 2, location-based
49479
Scope 2, market-based (if applicable)
44759
Start date
January 1 2019
End date
December 31 2019
Comment

C6.4(C6.4) Are there any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1, Scope 2 or Scope 3 emissions that are within your selectedreporting boundary which are not included in your disclosure?
No

C6.5(C6.5) Account for your organization’s gross global Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions.

CDP

Page 28 of 68

Purchased goods and services
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
199168Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Fortive uses global procurement data to derive relevant emissions based on provided spend data. Fortive uses EEIO emissions factors applied against direct and indirectspend in USD to arrive at final GHG figures.
Capital goods
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)112832Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Fortive uses global procurement data to derive relevant emissions based on provided spend data. Fortive uses EEIO emissions factors applied against direct and indirectspend in USD to arrive at final GHG figures.

Fuel-and-energy-related activities (not included in Scope 1 or 2)
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
11757
Emissions calculation methodology
Fuel-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
Fortive uses global energy purchases data to calculate emissions from this category. Global upstream emissions from fuel purchases and US upstream emissions fromelectricity purchases are calculated using emission factors derived from lifecycle analysis software. Outside the US, upstream emissions and T&D loses from electricity
purchases are estimated using emission factors from UK Defra Guidelines. Within the US, T&D losses are calculated using data from EPA's eGRID database.
Upstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
66523
Emissions calculation methodology
Supplier-specific method
Spend-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
50
Please explain
Fortive calculated upstream transportation & distribution emissions from a combination of spend data and vendor emission reports. GHG emissions were derived byapplying EEIO factor mapping based on spend category and shipment mode.
Waste generated in operations
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
2479
Emissions calculation methodology
Waste-type-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Fortive tracks waste generated in operations. Metrics include the amount of waste generated by type and disposal method. U.S. EPA WARM derived emission factors wereused to estimate emissions from this category.
CDP

Page 29 of 68

Business travel
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
11433
Emissions calculation methodology
Spend-based method
Distance-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
100
Please explain
This category includes hotel and business travel via air and rental cars. Air travel emissions are estimated using factors from the latest UK Defra Guidance. Emissions fromcar rentals are calculated using emission factors from the EPA's MRR, US National Inventory, and the EPA's Emission Factors Hub.
Employee commuting
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)
24100
Emissions calculation methodology
Distance-based method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Fortive calculated GHG emissions using distance-based methodology from employee home to office. Used the EPA EF Hub 2023, Scope 3 category 7, passenger careemissions factor for passenger car to arrive at GHG figures. Employee commute distances were determined for U.S. based employees using great circle distance between
two zip codes. Non-US zip codes used the average of these commute distances.
Upstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
This category is not relevant because all leased assets are included in Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
Downstream transportation and distribution
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Included in Category 4 emissions.
Processing of sold products
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
This category is not relevant because Fortive does not produce intermediate products that require processing.

CDP

Page 30 of 68

Use of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, not yet calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
End of life treatment of sold products
Evaluation status
Relevant, not yet calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Downstream leased assets
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
This category is not relevant because all leased assets are included in Scope 1 and 2 emissions.
Franchises
Evaluation status
Not relevant, explanation provided
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Fortive does not have businesses operating with a franchise model.
Investments
Evaluation status
Relevant, calculated
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)3249
Emissions calculation methodology
Investment-specific method
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners
0Please explain
Fortive applied ownership and revenue related data against US EEIO categorization factors to arrive at allocated GHG Emissions.

CDP

Page 31 of 68

Other (upstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain
Other (downstream)
Evaluation status
Emissions in reporting year (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>
Emissions calculation methodology<Not Applicable>
Percentage of emissions calculated using data obtained from suppliers or value chain partners<Not Applicable>
Please explain

C6.5a(C6.5a) Disclose or restate your Scope 3 emissions data for previous years.
Past year 1
Start date
January 1 2021
End date
December 31 2021
Scope 3: Purchased goods and services (metric tons CO2e)
173018
Scope 3: Capital goods (metric tons CO2e)
105254
Scope 3: Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2) (metric tons CO2e)
11343
Scope 3: Upstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)138120
Scope 3: Waste generated in operations (metric tons CO2e)2324
Scope 3: Business travel (metric tons CO2e)4685
Scope 3: Employee commuting (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Upstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Downstream transportation and distribution (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Processing of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Use of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: End of life treatment of sold products (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Downstream leased assets (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Franchises (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Investments (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (upstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Scope 3: Other (downstream) (metric tons CO2e)
Comment

C-CG6.6

CDP

Page 32 of 68

(C-CG6.6) Does your organization assess the life cycle emissions of any of its products or services?
Assessment of life cycle emissions
Row 1

Comment

No, but we plan to start doing so within the next two years

C6.7(C6.7) Are carbon dioxide emissions from biogenic carbon relevant to your organization?
No

C6.10
(C6.10) Describe your gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tons CO2e per unit currency total revenue and provide any
additional intensity metrics that are appropriate to your business operations.
Intensity figure
0.00001245
Metric numerator (Gross global combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions, metric tons CO2e)
51120
Metric denominator
unit total revenue
Metric denominator: Unit total
5286000000
Scope 2 figure used
Market-based% change from previous year
2.1
Direction of change
Decreased
Reason(s) for change
Other emissions reduction activities
Change in output
Change in revenue
Please explain
Scope 1 & 2 GHG emissions decreased from 2021 to 2022 AND annual revenue increased over the same period.

C7. Emissions breakdowns

C7.1(C7.1) Does your organization break down its Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type?
Yes

C7.1a
(C7.1a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by greenhouse gas type and provide the source of each used greenhouse warming potential(GWP).
Greenhouse gas

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons of CO2e)

GWP Reference

CO211824.5

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 - 100 year)

CH4

7.5

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 - 100 year)

N2O

29.8

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 - 100 year)

SF63567.2IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4 - 100 year)

C7.2

CDP

Page 33 of 68

(C7.2) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)

United States of America

13989.3

Canada86

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

182.9

Germany

459.3

China

25.7

India

113.1

Switzerland

63.7

Australia

2.3

Netherlands

26.3

Brazil8.2

Slovakia

182

Japan

6.3

Democratic People's Republic of Korea

4.1

France14.2

Sweden0.1

Taiwan, China

0.4

Chile

0.1

Colombia

0.1

Finland

1.3

Greece0.2

Hong Kong SAR, China

0.2

Indonesia

1

Italy

94.6

Mexico30.6

Poland106.1

Portugal

0.8

Qatar

0.8

Russian Federation

6.5

Saudi Arabia

0.6

Singapore

2.5

South Africa

0.8

Spain

12.2

Thailand

0.4

Turkey3.7

United Arab Emirates

0.7

Viet Nam

0.2

Israel

0.2

C7.3(C7.3) Indicate which gross global Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division

C7.3a

CDP

Page 34 of 68

(C7.3a) Break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 1 emissions (metric ton CO2e)

Accruent

15.9

Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP)

1654.7

Anderson-Negele

74.2

Censis

0

Fluke

4808

Fortive Corporate

2871

Gems Sensors

325.6

Gordian

1.8

Hengstler/Dynapar

497.1

Industrial Scientific921.3

Invetech0

Pacific Scientific EMC

330

Qualitrol

293.4

Setra

231.7

Tektronix

3139.2

Fluke Health Systems

263.6

Intelex0ServiceChannel

0

Provation

0

C7.5

CDP

Page 35 of 68

(C7.5) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by country/area/region.
Country/area/region

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

United States of America

28810.523455.5

Canada

151.8

151.8

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland829

1390.4Germany

644.4

1151.7

Japan

535.9

535.9

China

7022.97022.9India

1266.71266.7

Republic of Korea

135.3

135.3

France27.8

25.2

Switzerland

3.2

2.6

Australia

1121.31121.3

Netherlands

411.9

503.9

Sweden2.8

17Brazil77

77

Slovakia

00

Taiwan, China

162.1

162.1

Belgium

3.2

3Austria

8.9

4.1

Chile

1.9

1.9

Colombia

1.2

1.2

Denmark

0

0.5

Finland1

1.4

Greece1.6

1.4

Hong Kong SAR, China

11.3

11.3

Indonesia

66.6

66.6

Ireland

22.7

36.5

Israel

3.2

3.2

Italy

25.7

41

Malaysia

60.5

60.5

Poland72.1

89.8

Portugal

3.5

3.8

Qatar

3.8

3.8

Russian Federation

145.8

145.8

Saudi Arabia

4.6

4.6

Singapore

267.2

267.2

South Africa

21.4

21.4

Spain

38

48.2

Thailand

33.2

33.2

Turkey13.6

13.6

United Arab Emirates

3.2

3.2

Viet Nam

8.8

8.8

Mexico

95.5

95.5

C7.6
(C7.6) Indicate which gross global Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide.
By business division

C7.6a

CDP

Page 36 of 68

(C7.6a) Break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division.
Business division

Scope 2, location-based (metric tons CO2e)

Scope 2, market-based (metric tons CO2e)

Accruent

328.5

334

Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP)

479

500.7

Anderson-Negele

392.8

410.3

Censis

64.1

64.1

Fluke

10113.7

6326.5

Fortive Corporate

706.8

288.8

Gems Sensors

880.2

1124.1

Gordian178

178

Hengstler/Dynapar

3664.83530.7

Industrial Scientific2636.92655.1

Invetech1089.51081.2

Pacific Scientific EMC

3465.93427.6

Qualitrol

442

526.3

Setra

784.7

784.7

Tektronix

15777.7

15629.7

Fluke Health Systems

1116.61129.2

Intelex00ServiceChannel00Provation

0

0

C7.7
(C7.7) Is your organization able to break down your emissions data for any of the subsidiaries included in your CDP response?
Yes

C7.7a
(C7.7a) Break down your gross Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by subsidiary.
Subsidiary name
Accruent
Primary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
15.9
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)328.5
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)334
Comment
Subsidiary name
Anderson-Negele
Primary activity
Electronic components
CDP

Page 37 of 68

Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
74.2
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)392.8
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
410.3
Comment
Subsidiary name
Advanced Sterilization Products (ASP)
Primary activity
Medical equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)1654.7
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)479
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
500.7
Comment
Subsidiary name
Hengstler-Dynapar
Primary activity
Electronic components
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CDP

Page 38 of 68

CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)497.1
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)3664.8
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)3530.7
Comment
Subsidiary name
Fluke
Primary activity
Electronic equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
4808
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
10113.7
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)6326.5
Comment
Subsidiary nameGordianPrimary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 39 of 68

LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
1.8
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
178
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
178
Comment
Subsidiary name
CensisPrimary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
64.1
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
64.1
Comment
Subsidiary nameGems Sensors
Primary activity
Electronic components
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
325.6

CDP

Page 40 of 68

Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
880.2
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)1124.1
Comment
Subsidiary name
Industrial ScientificPrimary activity
Electronic equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
921.3
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)2636.9
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)2655.1
Comment
Subsidiary name
InvetechPrimary activity
Medical equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
Please selectISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)1089.5
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)1081.2
Comment

CDP

Page 41 of 68

Subsidiary name
Pacific Scientific EMC
Primary activity
Please selectSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
330
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)3465.9
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)3427.6
Comment
Subsidiary name
Qualitrol
Primary activity
Infrastructure upkeep & management
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
293.4
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)442
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)526.3
Comment
Subsidiary name
Setra
Primary activity
Electronic equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
Please select

CDP

Page 42 of 68

ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)
231.7
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)784.7
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)784.7
Comment
Subsidiary name
Tektronix
Primary activity
Electronic equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)3139.2
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
15777.7
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)
15629.7
Comment
Subsidiary name
Fluke Health Systems
Primary activity
Medical equipment
Select the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 43 of 68

Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)263.6
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)1116.6
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)1129.2
Comment
Subsidiary nameIntelexPrimary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Subsidiary nameServiceChannelPrimary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>

CDP

Page 44 of 68

Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment
Subsidiary name
Provation
Primary activity
SoftwareSelect the unique identifier(s) you are able to provide for this subsidiary
No unique identifier
ISIN code – bond<Not Applicable>
ISIN code – equity<Not Applicable>
CUSIP number<Not Applicable>
Ticker symbol<Not Applicable>
SEDOL code
<Not Applicable>
LEI number<Not Applicable>
Other unique identifier<Not Applicable>
Scope 1 emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, location-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Scope 2, market-based emissions (metric tons CO2e)0
Comment

C7.9(C7.9) How do your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Decreased

C7.9a(C7.9a) Identify the reasons for any change in your gross global emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined), and for each of them specify how your emissions compare
to the previous year.

CDP

Change in emissions (metric tons CO2e)

Direction of change in emissions

Emissions value (percentage)

Change in renewable energy consumption

2298.6

Decreased

4.3

Other emissions reduction activities

2129.8Decreased

4

Divestment<Not Applicable>

Acquisitions<Not Applicable>

Mergers<Not Applicable>

Change in output<Not Applicable>

Change in methodology<Not Applicable>

Change in boundary<Not Applicable>

Change in physical operating conditions<Not Applicable>

Unidentified<Not Applicable>

Other<Not Applicable>

Please explain calculation

Page 45 of 68

C7.9b
(C7.9b) Are your emissions performance calculations in C7.9 and C7.9a based on a location-based Scope 2 emissions figure or a market-based Scope 2
emissions figure?
Market-based

C-CG7.10(C-CG7.10) How do your total Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year compare to those of the previous reporting year?
Decreased

C-CG7.10a(C-CG7.10a) For each Scope 3 category calculated in C6.5, specify how your emissions compare to the previous year and identify the reason for any change.
Purchased goods and services
Direction of change
Increased
Primary reason for change
Other, please specify (Greater procurement of goods and services in CY )Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)
26150% change in emissions in this category
15.11
Please explain
Spend increased YoY.
Capital goods
Direction of change
Increased
Primary reason for change
Other, please specify (Greater procurement of goods and services in CY )Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)7578% change in emissions in this category
7.2
Please explain
Spend increased YoY.
Fuel and energy-related activities (not included in Scopes 1 or 2)
Direction of change
Increased
Primary reason for change
Change in output
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)414% change in emissions in this category
3.64
Please explain
Increased production necessitating FERA
Upstream transportation and distribution
Direction of change
Decreased
Primary reason for change
Change in methodology
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)71597% change in emissions in this category
51.83
Please explain
Improved quality of T&D Data and clarity on dataset corrected and improved accounting methodology.

CDP

Page 46 of 68

Waste generated in operations
Direction of change
Increased
Primary reason for change
Change in boundary
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)155% change in emissions in this category
6.67
Please explain
2022 data now includes waste estimations for space leased by OpCosBusiness travel
Direction of change
Increased
Primary reason for change
Change in boundary
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)6748% change in emissions in this category
144.03
Please explain
CY22 data now includes hotel data and related emissions. Continued return to business travel following COVID-19 downturn.
Employee commuting
Direction of changeFirst year of reporting this category
Primary reason for change<Not Applicable>
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>% change in emissions in this category<Not Applicable>
Please explain<Not Applicable>
Investments
Direction of changeFirst year of reporting this category
Primary reason for change<Not Applicable>
Change in emissions in this category (metric tons CO2e)<Not Applicable>% change in emissions in this category<Not Applicable>
Please explain<Not Applicable>

C8. Energy

C8.1(C8.1) What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?
More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

C8.2

CDP

Page 47 of 68

(C8.2) Select which energy-related activities your organization has undertaken.
Indicate whether your organization undertook this energy-related activity in the reporting year
Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstocks)

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity

Yes

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

No

Consumption of purchased or acquired steamNo

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling

No

Generation of electricity, heat, steam, or cooling

No

C8.2a
(C8.2a) Report your organization’s energy consumption totals (excluding feedstocks) in MWh.
MWh from non-renewable sources

Total (renewable and non-renewable) MWh

Consumption of fuel (excluding feedstock)

Heating value

LHV (lower heating value) 1165.2

MWh from renewable sources

47964.2

49129.4

Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity<Not Applicable>

10655.2

126298.6

136953.8

Consumption of purchased or acquired heat

<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired steam<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of purchased or acquired cooling<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy<Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Total energy consumption<Not Applicable>

11820.4

174262.8

186083.2

C8.2b
(C8.2b) Select the applications of your organization’s consumption of fuel.
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this fuel application
Consumption of fuel for the generation of electricity

Yes

Consumption of fuel for the generation of heat

No

Consumption of fuel for the generation of steamNo

Consumption of fuel for the generation of coolingNo

Consumption of fuel for co-generation or tri-generation

Yes

C8.2c
(C8.2c) State how much fuel in MWh your organization has consumed (excluding feedstocks) by fuel type.
Sustainable biomass
Heating value
LHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
1165.2
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Wood burned steam heating.

CDP

Page 48 of 68

Other biomass
Heating value
LHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Other renewable fuels (e.g. renewable hydrogen)Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
Comment
Coal
Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
Comment
Oil
Heating value
LHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
2349.2
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Diesel Fuel & No. 2 Fuel Oil

CDPPage 49 of 68

Gas
Heating value
LHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
45615
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Natural Gas
Other non-renewable fuels (e.g. non-renewable hydrogen)Heating value
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
Comment
Total fuelHeating value
LHV
Total fuel MWh consumed by the organization
47964.2
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of electricity0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of heat0
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of steam<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self-generation of cooling<Not Applicable>
MWh fuel consumed for self- cogeneration or self-trigeneration
0
Comment
Diesel Fuel, No. 2 Fuel Oil, Natural Gas

C8.2e(C8.2e) Provide details on the electricity, heat, steam, and/or cooling amounts that were accounted for at a zero or near-zero emission factor in the market-based
Scope 2 figure reported in C6.3.
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
United States of America
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)
CDP

Page 50 of 68

1500
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
China
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeWind
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)918
Tracking instrument used
GEC
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
China
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2013
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
China
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeHydropower (capacity unknown)
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)200
Tracking instrument used
GEC
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
China
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2015
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
India
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)558
Tracking instrument used

CDP

Page 51 of 68

Indian REC
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attributeIndia
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2013
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
India
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)360
Tracking instrument used
Indian REC
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attributeIndia
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2018
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
India
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeHydropower (capacity unknown)
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)200
Tracking instrument used
Indian REC
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attributeIndia
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2006
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
FranceSourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)200
Tracking instrument used
GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute

CDP

Page 52 of 68

FranceAre you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2011
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
PolandSourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology type
Other biomass
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)200
Tracking instrument used
GO
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
PolandAre you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
Yes
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)
2015
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
United States of America
Sourcing method
Unbundled procurement of energy attribute certificates (EACs)
Energy carrier
Electricity
Low-carbon technology typeSolar
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)1500
Tracking instrument used
US-RECCountry/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute
United States of America
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?
No
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Comment
Country/area of low-carbon energy consumption
China
Sourcing method
Please selectEnergy carrier<Not Applicable>
Low-carbon technology type
<Not Applicable>
Low-carbon energy consumed via selected sourcing method in the reporting year (MWh)<Not Applicable>
Tracking instrument used
<Not Applicable>
Country/area of origin (generation) of the low-carbon energy or energy attribute<Not Applicable>
Are you able to report the commissioning or re-powering year of the energy generation facility?

CDP

Page 53 of 68

<Not Applicable>
Commissioning year of the energy generation facility (e.g. date of first commercial operation or repowering)<Not Applicable>
Comment

C8.2g(C8.2g) Provide a breakdown by country/area of your non-fuel energy consumption in the reporting year.
Country/area
United States of America
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)98705.6
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
98705.6
Country/area
China
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)11223.7
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]<Calculated field>
Country/area
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)3939.8Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
3939.8Country/area
Germany
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1860.6
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0

CDPPage 54 of 68

Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1860.6Country/area
India
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1744.5
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1744.5Country/area
Australia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1630.2
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1630.2
Country/area
CanadaConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1168.8Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1168.8Country/area
Netherlands
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1114.8Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1114.8CDP

Page 55 of 68

Country/areaJapan
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)1096.9Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
1096.9Country/area
BrazilConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)736
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
736
Country/area
FranceConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)514.9
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
514.9
Country/area
SingaporeConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)445.3
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
445.3
Country/area
Russian Federation
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)

CDP

Page 56 of 68

404.9Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
404.9
Country/area
Republic of Korea
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)261.3
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
261.3
Country/area
Taiwan, China
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)259.5
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
259.5
Country/area
SwedenConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)221.2
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
221.2
Country/area
MexicoConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)192.1
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0

CDPPage 57 of 68

Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
192.1
Country/area
Switzerland
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)131.9
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
131.9
Country/area
Spain
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)104.2
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
104.2
Country/area
PolandConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)94.7
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
94.7
Country/area
Italy
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)89.5
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0
CDPPage 58 of 68

Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
89.5
Country/areaIndonesia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)54.7
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
54.7
Country/area
IrelandConsumption of purchased electricity (MWh)50
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
50
Country/area
Malaysia
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)45.4
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
45.4Country/area
Austria
Consumption of purchased electricity (MWh)35.3
Consumption of self-generated electricity (MWh)0Is this electricity consumption excluded from your RE100 commitment?
<Not Applicable>
Consumption of purchased heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Consumption of self-generated heat, steam, and cooling (MWh)0Total non-fuel energy consumption (MWh) [Auto-calculated]
35.3
CDP

Page 59 of 68

C-CG8.5(C-CG8.5) Does your organization measure the efficiency of any of its products or services?
Measurement of
product/service
efficiency
Row No, but we plan to start
1
doing so within the next
two years

Comment

Fortive is undertaking research and analysis to develop a consistent, transparent framework to evaluate, quantify and validate the efficiency of products and services across ouroperating companies. Existing frameworks are being evaluated for efficacy and applicability, and given the diverse nature of our operating companies, we are evaluating across a
range of industries.

C9. Additional metrics

C9.1(C9.1) Provide any additional climate-related metrics relevant to your business.
Description
Other, please specify (Energy intensity per operational square foot)Metric value
Metric numerator
MMBTu
Metric denominator (intensity metric only)
Square footage (SF)% change from previous year
Direction of change<Not Applicable>
Please explain

C-CE9.6/C-CG9.6/C-CH9.6/C-CN9.6/C-CO9.6/C-EU9.6/C-MM9.6/C-OG9.6/C-RE9.6/C-ST9.6/C-TO9.6/C-TS9.6(C-CE9.6/C-CG9.6/C-CH9.6/C-CN9.6/C-CO9.6/C-EU9.6/C-MM9.6/C-OG9.6/C-RE9.6/C-ST9.6/C-TO9.6/C-TS9.6) Does your organization invest in research anddevelopment (R&D) of low-carbon products or services related to your sector activities?

Row 1

Investment in low-carbon R&D

Comment

Yes

Fortive has numerous operating companies that invest in R&D of low-carbon products to serve our customers.

C-CG9.6a(C-CG9.6a) Provide details of your organization’s investments in low-carbon R&D for capital goods products and services over the last three years.
Technology area
Control systems
Stage of development in the reporting year
Full/commercial-scale demonstration
Average % of total R&D investment over the last 3 years
20
R&D investment figure in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4) (optional)
Average % of total R&D investment planned over the next 5 years
Explain how your R&D investment in this technology area is aligned with your climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Setra Remote Energy Monitoring; these sensor-based systems enable customers to apply sensors where they want to track energy use at a systems or equipment level;
the data is then fed into a centralized software interface to provide real-time monitoring and a detailed understanding of where/how energy is used throughout thefacility/campus.
Technology area
Machinery automation
Stage of development in the reporting year
Large scale commercial deployment
Average % of total R&D investment over the last 3 years
CDP

Page 60 of 68

15
R&D investment figure in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4) (optional)
Average % of total R&D investment planned over the next 5 years
Explain how your R&D investment in this technology area is aligned with your climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Andersen-Negele develops sensors used throughout the food and beverage sector to ensure precision homogenization and pasteurization to reduce water and otheradditive usage in the beverage production process.
Technology area
Renewable energy
Stage of development in the reporting year
Large scale commercial deployment
Average % of total R&D investment over the last 3 years
15
R&D investment figure in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4) (optional)
Average % of total R&D investment planned over the next 5 years
Explain how your R&D investment in this technology area is aligned with your climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Qualitrol provides a range of products that monitor electricity and power infrastructure to ensure stable, continuous operations by:- monitoring single parameters on a power transformer to maintain health and alarm on established thresholds- providing electrical utilities insight into the health of their assets to aid in better planning of resources, prolonging asset life, avoiding unplanned power outages, and avoid
environmental remediation incidents (fires and oil spills) due to catastrophic asset failure,- diagnosing faults and power quality issues on the electrical grid when unplanned power outages occur, andhelping electrical utilities to restore power quickly and safely while providing data to root cause the issue of the outage(s).
Technology area
Other, please specify (GHG Management and Accounting Software)Stage of development in the reporting year
Full/commercial-scale demonstration
Average % of total R&D investment over the last 3 years
5
R&D investment figure in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4) (optional)
Average % of total R&D investment planned over the next 5 years
Explain how your R&D investment in this technology area is aligned with your climate commitments and/or climate transition planIntelex, a Fortive company, develops web and mobile applications that streamline and simplify environmental, safety and quality management to help companies around theworld ensure compliance, reduce risk and improve performance. Their products include ESG-focused applications such as the Sustainability Performance Indicators (SPI)
solution that enables organizations to effectively manage and analyze their ESG data including GHG inventories. By empowering customers to have ESG and GHG data inreal-time, customers are positioned to action their data, measure the impacts, and communicate easily with stakeholder audiences.
Technology area
Other, please specify (Other Energy Efficient Products or Efficiency Services)Stage of development in the reporting year
Large scale commercial deployment
Average % of total R&D investment over the last 3 years
20
R&D investment figure in the reporting year (unit currency as selected in C0.4) (optional)
Average % of total R&D investment planned over the next 5 years
Explain how your R&D investment in this technology area is aligned with your climate commitments and/or climate transition plan
Fluke offers a suite of products that enable customers to reduce and avoid emissions, including (but not limited to):- Thermal imaging: handheld thermal cameras for preventive maintenance, inspections and frontline troubleshooting of electrical systems,- Thermal calibration: tools that identify and correct errors in temperature measurement to establish and maintain desired set points in process heating and coolingapplications/HVAC,- Industrial imaging: Enable customers to locate air, gas and vacuum leaks in compressed air systems (compressed air leaks are a leading source of waste energy use inindustrial operations (>6% of total energy consumed, on average),- Power standards: Calibrating equipment used to manage reliability of power distribution. and.
- Fluke battery testers: Tools and equipment to test efficiency of batteries, including batteries associated with solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays, to discharge efficiency andmaximize charging cycles.

C10. Verification

C10.1

CDP

Page 61 of 68

(C10.1) Indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your reported emissions.
Verification/assurance status
Scope 1

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 2 (location-based or market-based)

Third-party verification or assurance process in place

Scope 3No third-party verification or assurance

C10.1a(C10.1a) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 1 emissions, and attach the relevant statements.
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
Fortive CY22 Assurance Statement-ASRauth.pdf
Page/ section reference
Page 1
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.1b
(C10.1b) Provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken for your Scope 2 emissions and attach the relevant statements.
Scope 2 approach
Scope 2 market-based
Verification or assurance cycle in place
Annual process
Status in the current reporting year
Complete
Type of verification or assurance
Limited assurance
Attach the statement
Fortive CY22 Assurance Statement-ASRauth.pdf
Page/ section reference
Page 1
Relevant standard
ISO14064-3
Proportion of reported emissions verified (%)
100

C10.2
(C10.2) Do you verify any climate-related information reported in your CDP disclosure other than the emissions figures reported in C6.1, C6.3, and C6.5?
No, we do not verify any other climate-related information reported in our CDP disclosure

C11. Carbon pricing

C11.1(C11.1) Are any of your operations or activities regulated by a carbon pricing system (i.e. ETS, Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax)?
No, and we do not anticipate being regulated in the next three years

CDP

Page 62 of 68

C11.2(C11.2) Has your organization canceled any project-based carbon credits within the reporting year?
No

C11.3
(C11.3) Does your organization use an internal price on carbon?
No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next two years

C12. Engagement

C12.1(C12.1) Do you engage with your value chain on climate-related issues?
Yes, our customers/clients

C12.1b
(C12.1b) Give details of your climate-related engagement strategy with your customers.
Type of engagement & Details of engagement
Education/information sharing

Share information about your products and relevant certification schemes (i.e. Energy STAR)% of customers by number
20% of customer - related Scope 3 emissions as reported in C6.5
0
Please explain the rationale for selecting this group of customers and scope of engagement
Due to the prominence and role of Fortive's operating companies in relevant markets such as renewable energy, we both receive questions/inquiries from customers AND
solicit information from customers about products' and services' energy efficiency, certifications, etc.
Impact of engagement, including measures of success
Net promoter score (NPS): varies by operating company, business unit, product category etc. but on average, we always look to increase NPS by 10%

C12.2(C12.2) Do your suppliers have to meet climate-related requirements as part of your organization’s purchasing process?
No, but we plan to introduce climate-related requirements within the next two years

C12.3

CDP

Page 63 of 68

(C12.3) Does your organization engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate?
Row 1
External engagement activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Yes, we engage directly with policy makers
No, we have assessed our activities, and none could either directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Does your organization have a public commitment or position statement to conduct your engagement activities in line with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
No, and we do not plan to have one in the next two years
Attach commitment or position statement(s)<Not Applicable>
Describe the process(es) your organization has in place to ensure that your external engagement activities are consistent with your climate commitments and/or
climate transition plan
Our engagement is led and informed by our publicly stated goals and Sustainability strategy, which includes climate change. We engage when/if there is a public policy or
proposed regulations that either support our goals and strategy (lend support) or to raise opposition with public policy or proposed regulations that may negatively impact
our strategy. For example, Fortive submitted comments to the Securities & Exchange Commission in response to the draft Climate-related Disclosure Ruling to raise
concerns about select proposed requirements.
Primary reason for not engaging in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Important but not an immediate priority
Explain why your organization does not engage in activities that could directly or indirectly influence policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Climate policy in development

C12.3a(C12.3a) On what policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate has your organization been engaging directly with policy makers in the reporting year?
Specify the policy, law, or regulation on which your organization is engaging with policy makers
The U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)'s draft Climate-risk related rule (issued March 2022)
Category of policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Climate change mitigation
Focus area of policy, law, or regulation that may impact the climate
Climate-related reporting
Climate transition plans
Emissions – CO2
Transparency requirements
Verification and audits
Policy, law, or regulation geographic coverage
National
Country/area/region the policy, law, or regulation applies toUnited States Minor Outlying Islands
United States of AmericaYour organization’s position on the policy, law, or regulation
Support with major exceptions
Description of engagement with policy makers
Comment letter (public)
Details of exceptions (if applicable) and your organization’s proposed alternative approach to the policy, law or regulation
1) inclusion of Scope 3 emissions
2) 1% financial materiality threshold3) Scenario Analysis disclosure4) Disclosure activation timeline
Have you evaluated whether your organization’s engagement on this policy, law, or regulation is aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement?
Yes, we have evaluated, and it is aligned
Please explain whether this policy, law or regulation is central to the achievement of your climate transition plan and, if so, how?
<Not Applicable>

C12.4

CDP

Page 64 of 68

(C12.4) Have you published information about your organization’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places
other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Publication
In mainstream reports, incorporating the TCFD recommendations
StatusComplete
Attach the document2022-Fortive-Sustainability-Report_Appendix.pdf
2022-Fortive-Sustainability-Report_Final.pdf
Page/Section reference
Protect the Planet (p. 33-36) Report Appendix (p. 8, 11-16)
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment
Publication
In mainstream reports
StatusComplete
Attach the document
proxy-statement.pdf
Page/Section reference
3-4, 9-10, 19-40
Content elements
Governance
Strategy
Risks & opportunities
Emissions figures
Emission targets
Comment

C12.5(C12.5) Indicate the collaborative frameworks, initiatives and/or commitments related to environmental issues for which you are a signatory/member.

Row 1

Environmental collaborative framework, initiative and/or commitment

Describe your organization’s role within each framework, initiative and/or commitment

UN Global Compact

Signatory

C15. Biodiversity

C15.1(C15.1) Is there board-level oversight and/or executive management-level responsibility for biodiversity-related issues within your organization?

Row
1

Board-level oversight and/or executive management-level responsibility for biodiversity-related
issuesDescription of oversight and objectives relating tobiodiversity

Scope of board-level
oversight

No, and we do not plan to have both within the next two years<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

C15.2(C15.2) Has your organization made a public commitment and/or endorsed any initiatives related to biodiversity?
Indicate whether your organization made a public commitment or endorsed any initiatives related to biodiversity
Row 1 No, and we do not plan to do so within the next 2 years

CDP

Biodiversity-related public commitments

Initiatives endorsed<Not Applicable><Not Applicable>

Page 65 of 68

C15.3(C15.3) Does your organization assess the impacts and dependencies of its value chain on biodiversity?
Impacts on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
No and we don’t plan to within the next two years
Value chain stage(s) covered<Not Applicable>
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity<Not Applicable>
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)<Not Applicable>
Dependencies on biodiversity
Indicate whether your organization undertakes this type of assessment
No and we don’t plan to within the next two years
Value chain stage(s) covered<Not Applicable>
Portfolio activity<Not Applicable>
Tools and methods to assess impacts and/or dependencies on biodiversity<Not Applicable>
Please explain how the tools and methods are implemented and provide an indication of the associated outcome(s)<Not Applicable>

C15.4(C15.4) Does your organization have activities located in or near to biodiversity- sensitive areas in the reporting year?
Not assessed

C15.5(C15.5) What actions has your organization taken in the reporting year to progress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Have you taken any actions in the reporting period to progress your biodiversity-related commitments?
Row 1 No, we are not taking any actions to progress our biodiversity-related commitments

Type of action taken to progress biodiversity- related commitments<Not Applicable>

C15.6(C15.6) Does your organization use biodiversity indicators to monitor performance across its activities?

Row 1

Does your organization use indicators to monitor biodiversity performance?

Indicators used to monitor biodiversity performance

No

Please select

C15.7(C15.7) Have you published information about your organization’s response to biodiversity-related issues for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP
response? If so, please attach the publication(s).
Report typeContent elements

Attach the document and indicate where in the document the relevant biodiversity information is locatedC16. Signoff

C-FI

CDP

Page 66 of 68

(C-FI) Use this field to provide any additional information or context that you feel is relevant to your organization's response. Please note that this field is optional
and is not scored.

C16.1(C16.1) Provide details for the person that has signed off (approved) your CDP climate change response.

Row 1

Job title

Corresponding job categoryPeter Underwood

Other C-Suite Officer

SC. Supply chain module

SC0.0(SC0.0) If you would like to do so, please provide a separate introduction to this module.

SC0.1(SC0.1) What is your company’s annual revenue for the stated reporting period?
Annual Revenue
Row 1

SC1.1
(SC1.1) Allocate your emissions to your customers listed below according to the goods or services you have sold them in this reporting period.

SC1.2(SC1.2) Where published information has been used in completing SC1.1, please provide a reference(s).

SC1.3(SC1.3) What are the challenges in allocating emissions to different customers, and what would help you to overcome these challenges?
Allocation challenges

Please explain what would help you overcome these challenges

SC1.4(SC1.4) Do you plan to develop your capabilities to allocate emissions to your customers in the future?

SC2.1(SC2.1) Please propose any mutually beneficial climate-related projects you could collaborate on with specific CDP Supply Chain members.

SC2.2(SC2.2) Have requests or initiatives by CDP Supply Chain members prompted your organization to take organizational-level emissions reduction initiatives?

SC4.1(SC4.1) Are you providing product level data for your organization’s goods or services?

CDP

Page 67 of 68

Submit your response
In which language are you submitting your response?
EnglishPlease confirm how your response should be handled by CDP

Please select your submission options

I understand that my response will be shared with all requesting stakeholders

Response permission

Yes

PublicPlease confirm below
I have read and accept the applicable Terms

CDP

Page 68 of 68