JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroducing double-bundle modular electric heatpumps at AXIA SOUTH CIKARANG Tower 2

Reference number

ID008

Third-party entity (TPE)

TPE-ID-003 Japan Quality Assurance
Organization (JQA)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Toyota Tsusho Corporation

Date of completion of this report

09/09/2016

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
impactimpact assessment, if required by the Republic ofassessment
Indonesia, in line with Indonesia’s procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
1JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Koichiro
Team
JQA
Ms.
TanabeleaderMr.
Sachiko
Team
JQA
Ms.
Hashizume
memberMr.
HiroshiInternal
JQA
Ms.
Motokawa
reviewer
Mr.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized
N/A* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
Through a review of the draft PDD, it was checked and confirmed that the PDD wascompleted using the latest version of the PDD form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver01.0)
appropriate to the type of project and drafted in line with JCM Guidelines for Developing
PDD and MR (JCM_ID_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0).
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the PDD was completed using the valid form in linewith the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>3

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The proposed JCM project aims to reduce CO2 emissions in Indonesia by introducing
a high efficient technology for hot water supply and air conditioning system incommercial buildings. The proposed project introduces a water-to-water double-bundle
modular electric heat pumps (modular HP) system to a new residential hotel "AXIA
SOUTH CIKARANG Tower 2" in Bekasi, which is located on the eastern border of
Jakarta. The project will provide hot water and air conditioning to the common area andthe back yard of the project hotel, reducing the consumption of fossil fuel which would
have been used for the conventional boilers for hot water supply. In addition, the energy
efficiency for the air conditioning would be also improved, leading to the additionalenergy saving. The key technology of the proposed JCM project has been defined in
the approved methodology “Introducing double-bundle modular electric heat pumps to a
new building, version 1.0” (ID_AM010).
The emission reductions that would be achieved by the proposed project are
estimated to be 175 ton annually. This estimate may vary depending on the hot water
demand and the cooling demand at the hotel during the monitoring period. The
estimated emission reductions of the period from 2016 through 2020 are calculated in
the PDD.
The validation team conducted document review, and then conducted a one-day
on-site inspection on 24/08/2016, including a follow-up interview. The location of the
proposed JCM project, including coordinates, was checked during the on-site visit. The
project description was also cross-checked through the physical inspection andinterview with a representative of each of the entities below, who have been involved in
the proposed JCM project:
 PT. TTL Residences (hereinafter called “the project participant”)
 PT Takenaka Indonesia (hereinafter called “the engineering service provider”) Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd. (JCM consultant)

It was confirmed through interview with the interviewees that the starting date ofproject operation was on 01/04/2016, which was the official opening date of AXIA
SOUTH CIKARANG Tower 2. It was also confirmed that the expected operational
lifetime of the proposed JCM project is eight years, which was defined by a statutory
useful life of the proposed technology under the regulation of Indonesia (Regulation of
the Finance Minister, No.96/PMK. 03/2009, Category 2).
For the purpose of knowledge transfer of the advanced technology, the engineering
service provider has provided the facility management team of PT. TTL Residences with
4

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

opportunities for practice through the trial and commercial operation of the projectequipment, and it is also conducting a training session to the team. This finding was
confirmed through review of supporting documents and the on-site inspection, with asatisfactory result.
As a result, the team determined that the description of the proposed JCM project in
the PDD was accurate, complete, and provided an understanding of the proposed JCM
project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the accuracy and completeness of the projectdescription were valid.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
Selection of methodology(ies)
Through a review of the draft PDD and Monitoring Plan (Monitoring Plan Sheet andMonitoring Structure Sheet), it was confirmed that the following latest version of
methodology was correctly quoted and applied in the proposed JCM project.
 JCM_ID_AM010_ver01.0
The assessment results of the eligibility criteria in the approved methodology aresummarized as below:
Criterion 1:
A project introduces (a) modular HP(s) to a new building. The total cooling capacity ofthe modular HP(s) is altogether less than 176 kW or 600,000 BTU/hr.
Through reviewing supporting documents (the specifications of the installed modular
HPs) and interviewing during the physical inspection, the project information of Criterion
1 described in the PDD, was checked and confirmed as below with a satisfactory result:
 AXIA SOUTH CIKARANG Tower 2 is a new building, which began the construction
work in October 2014 and was completed in March 2016.
5

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

 The total cooling capacity of the installed modular HPs (6 units) is 171.6kW(28.6kW/unit × 6 units), which is less than 176kW.
Criterion 2:
The modular HP(s) introduced under the project has its technical capability to produce
outgoing hot water higher than or equal to 70 degrees Celsius. The value can bechecked against specifications from an equipment supplier.
Through interview with the project participant, the project information of Criterion 2
described in the PDD was checked as below:
 During and after the on-site inspection, model code of the installed modular HPs
was confirmed through the nameplate of the equipment and product guarantee
letter issued by the equipment supplier.
 It was explained by the project participant that the technical capability of outgoing
hot water produced by the installed modular HPs is higher than 70 degrees Celsius,
while its practical capability under normal operating condition is 65 degrees
Celsius. However it was not confirmed through supporting documents (thespecification and performance characteristic table of the installed modular HPs).
Therefore, clarification request (CL01) was raised.
Criterion 3:
In addition to the modular HP(s) installed for project, oil-fired hot water generating
equipment(s) and/or electric-run chilled water generating equipment(s) may be installed
and operated to supply hot and/or chilled water to the project building. In such cases,
the capacity of these additional equipment to generate hot and/or chilled water is lessthan or equal to half of the heating capacity and/or the cooling capacity of the modularHP(s), respectively.
Through reviewing supporting documents (the specifications of an electric-run chilledwater generating equipment) and interviewing during the physical inspection, theproject information of Criterion 3 described in the PDD was checked and confirmed as
below with a satisfactory result: An electric-run chilled water generating system has been already installed, while
there is no plan to install oil-fired hot water generating equipment in the proposed
JCM project.
 Two units of electric-run chiller have been installed and the nominal cooling
capacity of 60kW each.
 These two chiller units have been designed for alternate-switching operation based6

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

on the cooling demand of the hotel, and thus they are not operated simultaneously
under normal operating condition. Moreover, according to performance results ofthese equipments after the commercial operations, cooling demand of the hotel has
been met with this chiller operation with the room occupancy ratio above 90%. The
maximum operating cooling capacity of the additional equipment is, therefore,
60kW, which is less than half of the cooling capacity of the modular HPs.
Criterion 4:
A plan for not releasing refrigerant used for the modular HP(s) is prepared, if therefrigerant contains CFCs, HFCs, or HCFCs.
Through reviewing supporting documents (management plan document for Freonleakage) and interviewing during the physical inspection, the project information ofCriterion 4 described in the PDD was checked and confirmed as below with asatisfactory result: “Management plan for Freon leakage” has been established and it covers modular
HPs only (an electric-run chilled water generating system is not included). The
specification of modular HPs states that HFC-134a is the only refrigerant that isused for the modular HPs.
 Operating instructions for troubleshooting have been also established. The
pressure of compressed air for each of modular HPs is closely monitoredindividually under normal operating condition, and in case of a refrigerant leak, it isalerted to internal facility engineers for emergency measures immediately. Initial
response procedures in emergency are available, and organization for heat pump
maintenance by service engineers of the equipment supplier has been built.
 On the other hand, it was not confirmed whether any regular maintenance isnecessary for a refrigerant leak caused by refill of refrigerant during the expected
operational lifetime of the project.
Therefore, clarification request (CL02) was raised.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL01)
As for Criterion 2, it is requested to clarify the technical capability of outgoing hot waterproduced by the installed modular HPs through any supporting documents.

7

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(Summary of the response on CL01)
Supporting documents were submitted.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL01)
It was confirmed through the supporting documents provided by the project participantthat the technical capability of the installed modular HPs was confirmed appropriately.
Therefore, CL01 was closed.

(Issue raised as CL02)
As for Criterion 2, it is requested to clarify whether any regular maintenance, which
includes a refrigerant leak caused by refill of refrigerant, is required during the expected
operational lifetime of the project.
(Summary of the response on CL02)
Additional supporting documents were submitted, and clarification was provided byequipment supplier.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL02)
It was confirmed through the supporting documents and clarification that any regular
maintenance, which causes a refrigerant leak, is not planned. Therefore, CL02 wasclosed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team reached the conclusion that the relevant information contained in
the PDD is in compliance with the eligibility criterion listed in the approved methodology
applied. The issues raised by the team were fully clarified.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
It is confirmed through desk review that the emission sources and GHGs, which aredescribed in the draft PDD, are described based on evidential documents properly. It isalso confirmed through an on-site inspection that they are corroborated as below:
 As illustrated in the PDD, the proposed JCM project includes modular HPs,
electric-run chillers, and the other electric-run auxiliary equipment.
 It was observed that an in-house power generator (diesel fuel) had been installed in8

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the building, for emergency use. The project participant excludes it from the projectboundary, and the validation team considered it reasonable.
Since the applied methodology does not allow the PPs to choose any source or gas
to be included, all emission sources and their associated GHGs relevant to the
proposed JCM project meet the applied methodology. As for Monitoring Spreadsheet,
the appropriate form, which is defined in the applied methodology and not altered, isused. It is cross-checked and concluded that the required fields of the spreadsheet arefilled in appropriately.
Parameters to be fixed ex ante
Through cross-check of the project-specific parameters fixed ex ante, it was notconfirmed through the supporting documents whether EFelec (CO2 emission factor forthe electricity consumed by the project and the reference equipment), which was
identified in the Monitoring Spreadsheet, is appropriate or not. Therefore, a clarification
request (CL03) was raised.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL03)
It is requested to provide the validation team with the latest supporting document todetermine EFelec.
(Summary of the response on CL03)
Supporting document and the revised PDD were submitted.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL03)
The validation team determined that EFelec (CO2 emission factor for the electricity
consumed by the project and the reference equipment) is to be corrected to 0.840
tCO2/MWh from 0.843 tCO2/MWh, according to the latest data sourced from “GHG
emission factors of electricity interconnection systems 2014”, which issued byIndonesian national directorate general of electricity. The PDD was revised correctly,
and thus CL03 was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
9JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The validation team reached the conclusion through the validation that the selected
emission sources and GHG types were justified for the JCM project. The validationteam assessed values for project-specific parameters to be fixed ex ante in the
Monitoring Plan Sheet and intermediate processes to derive the values. As a result,
those were considered reasonable in the context of the proposed JCM project. The
issue raised by the team was fully clarified, which resulted in a revision of the PDD andthe Monitoring Plan Sheet.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
It is confirmed through review of AMDAL (Environmental Impact Assessment inIndonesia) that the proposed JCM project is not required to conduct AMDAL, since it is
not applicable for the project type (Housing and Human Settlement Sector) of AMDAL.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the project design of the proposed JCM project
was in accordance with the EIA regulation in the Republic of Indonesia.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
Through document review and interviews with local stakeholders, the following
information was confirmed with a satisfactory result:(a) Comments been invited from local stakeholders that are relevant for the proposed
project.
The relevant local stakeholders have been identified by the project participants, and a
LSC meeting was held on 04/02/2016, with inviting the following local stakeholders
respectively:
 Indonesia JCM Secretariat
 Bureau of Industry, Trade, Cooperative, and Micro Small Medium Business of10

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Bekasi Regency
 International Cooperation Division, Regional Autonomy and Cooperation Bureau,
Government of West Java Province Social Service Bureau, Government of West Java Province PT TTL Residences PT Takenaka Indonesia
 PT Toyota Tsusho Indonesia
 Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.
(b) The summary of the comments received as provided in the PDD is complete.
 The summary of the comments received has been described in the PDD. Throughinterview with one of local stakeholders (PT Takenaka Indonesia), it is confirmedthat those comments have been described in the PDD appropriately.
(c) The project participants have taken due account of all comments received and havedescribed this process in the PDD.
JQA determines that the relevant local stakeholders have been identified appropriate
and the information on the LSC meeting has been described in the PDD appropriately.
As a result, it is concluded that no additional actions are required for the comments
received.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the local stakeholder consultation of the proposed
JCM project was adequate.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
Through document review and interviews with the project participants, the following
information was confirmed:(a) Assessment of compliance of the monitoring plan with the approved methodology
11

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

and/or PDD and Monitoring Guidelines
The parameters, which are required in the applied methodology, have been defined inMonitoring Plan Spreadsheet (MPS). As for the means of monitoring, JQA conductedinterview with the engineering service provider to confirm the following information:
 In order to monitor QPJh,j (Quantity of heating energy utilized by the project building
during the period p) and QPJc,j (Quantity of cooling energy utilized by the projectbuilding during the period p), two approaches ((1) calorimeter or (2) calculation
results using a set of different monitored data) are defined and described in“measurement methods and procedures” of the MPS, while the project participant
does not have any plan to install calorimeter for monitoring.
Therefore, clarification request (CL04) was raised.
 QPJh,j and QPJc,j are determined by calculation results using a set of data monitored
by a flow meter or a temperature measuring meter. Data monitoring, calculation,
recording and reporting are controlled by BMS (building management system), andthe calculation results of QPJh,j and QPJc,j are reported directly.
 According to the equipment supplier of monitoring meters, a flow meter is calibrated
prior to factory shipment, based on JCSS (Japan Calibration Service System),
which complies with ISO/IEC17025. On the other hand, no information concerning
calibration of a temperature measuring meter was provided through the on-site
inspection.
Therefore, clarification request (CL05) was raised.
 Meanwhile, according to the supplier of electricity measuring meters, an electricity
measuring meter is calibrated prior to factory shipment, based on IEC 62053-22(Electricity metering equipment - Particular Requirements - Part 22: Static meters
for active energy).
(b) Assessment of the implementation of the plan
Through interview with the project participant, it is confirmed that facility management
team for modular HPs has been organized in the organization of the project participant,in line with Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) of the proposed JCM project. The teamhas both executive assistant manager (as Monitoring manager of MSS) and chiefengineer (As Facility Manager of MSS) to manage assistant engineers.

12JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL04)
It is requested to clarify whether approach 1 is used for monitoring or not.
(Summary of the response on CL04)
The revised MPS was submitted.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL04)
The validation team confirmed that the description of approach 1 was deleted from therevised MPS. As a result, CL04 was closed.

(Issue raised as CL05)
It is requested to provide information concerning calibration of a temperature
measuring meter.
(Summary of the response on CL05)
Supporting documents were submitted.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL05)
It was confirmed through the submitted supporting documents that a temperature
measuring meter is also checked based on inspection specification, including allowableerror range, and such inspection is conducted for all temperature measuring meters
prior to factory shipment. As a result, CL05 was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that Monitoring Plan of the proposed JCM projectcomplied with the requirements of the methodology and/or PDD and Monitoring
Guidelines, and the project participants had ability to implement the described
Monitoring Plan, including Monitoring Structure Sheet.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
Through document review, it is confirmed that the Modalities of Communication (MoC)
have applied the latest version of MoC form. The date of submission indicated in the
MoC is 03/08/2016, and it is considered to be valid. JQA also conducted interviews with
13

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the signatories of the Modalities of Communication (MoC), and then identified thepersonnel and their employment status, including the specimen signatures. Therefore,
JQA determine that the information of all project participants, including the focal point
provided in the MoC and its correctness of authority, is appropriate.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the MoC complied with all relevant forms andrequirements.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
It was confirmed through review of the relevant website (e.g. UNFCCC website, Markit
Environmental Registry, etc.) that the proposed JCM project has not been registeredunder other international climate mitigation mechanisms. Also, the written confirmationof the avoidance of double registration was provided through the signed MoC, and wascross-checked through interview with the project participant, with a satisfactory result.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the proposed JCM project was not registeredunder the other international climate mitigation mechanisms at the stage of validation.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
14

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Through interview with the project participant, it was confirmed that the starting date ofproject operation was identified as the opening date of AXIA SOUTH CIKARANG Tower
2, dated 01/04/2016, which is not before 01/01/2013.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concludes that the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM
project has been defined appropriately.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No other issue was identified.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable.

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
The PDD of the proposed JCM project, which was submitted in line with the Project
Cycle Procedure, was made publicly available through the JCM website for public
inputs. This call for public comments is open from 06/08/2016 to 04/09/2016 (24:00
GMT). The specific JCM website is as below: https://www.jcm.go.jp/id-jp/information/173
D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants15

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

No comment was received during the period of the public comments; therefore, noaction was required to be taken into due account by the project participants.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees Shintaro Morita, Project Manager, Toyota Tsusho Corporation
 Takuma Sato, President Director, PT TTL Residences
 Ohshu Hayashi, Director, PT TTL Residences Muahtaruddin Sitorus, Executive assistant manager, PT TTL Residences Maman Sudirman, Chief Engineering, PT TTL Residences
 Koichi Tada, Senior Manager, PT Takenaka Indonesia
 Chisato Nakade, Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.
 Ricky Tagar Risnauli, Senior Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
Co., Ltd.
E.2. List of documents received
 Project Design Document (draft version)(JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver01.0_AXIA2_HP.docx)
 Project Design Document (final version)(JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver01.0_ID008_final.docx)
 Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (draft version)(JCM_ID_AM010_ver01.0_AXIA2_HP.xlsx)
 Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (final version)(JCM_ID_AM010_ver01.0_ID008_final.xlsx)
 Modalities of communications statement (submitted with the draft PDD for
publication)
 Modalities of communications statement (a validated version for submission ofrequest for registration)
 JCM Approved Methodology ID_AM010 (JCM_ID_AM010_ver01.0.pdf)
 Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet ID_AM010(JCM_ID_AM010_ver01.0.xlsx)
 JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_ID_Glossary_ver02.0)
 JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_ID_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0)
 JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_ID_PCP_ver04.0)
 JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_ID_GL_VV_ver01.0)
16

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

 JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (JCM_ID_F_MoC_ver01.0.pdf)
 JCM Project Design Document Form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver01.0.docx)
 JCM Validation Report Form (JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0.docx)
 Brochure of Axia South Cikarang
 Regulation of the Finance Minister, No.96/PMK. 03/2009, Category 2 (Statutory
useful life of modular HP)
 Specification of modular HP system
 Performance characteristic table of modular HPs (COP) Specification of an electric-run chilled water generating equipment
 Management plan document for Freon leakage
 Project system boundary (utility piping system schematic diagram) Meeting minutes of the local stakeholder consultation
 Clarification letter for specification of measuring equipment (inlet/outlet temperature
measuring meters and flow meters)
 Specification or calibration certificate of measuring equipment (water flow meter)
 Specification or calibration certificate of electricity measuring meters for modular
HPs and auxiliary electric equipment for the modular HP
 Model of the installed modular HPs
 Table 1.4 of Ch.1 Vol.2 of 2006 IPCC Guidelines on National GHG Inventories
 “Emission Factors of Electricity Interconnection Systems”, National Committee on
Clean Development Mechanism (Indonesian DNA for CDM), based on data obtained
by Directorate General of Electricity, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources,
Indonesia
 Presentation materials for local stakeholder consultation
 Legal requirement of environmental impact assessment in Indonesia
 Equipment list for heat pump source Specimen signature of the representative of Toyota Tsusho Corporation
 Clarification letter for modular HPs on the past record of Freon leakage
 Maintenance agreement between the equipment supplier and the local distributer for
modular HPs

17

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.

Statement of competence
Name: Mr. Koichiro Tanabe
Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator-

Verifier

2014/12/22

Team leader

2015/3/24

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry

2014/12/22

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2014/12/22

18

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Statement of competence
Name:

Ms. Sachiko Hashizume

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2015/11/20

Verifier

2015/11/20-

Team leader

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2015/11/20

TA 1.2. Renewables

2015/11/20

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2015/11/20

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2015/11/20

19

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Statement of competence
Name: Mr. Hiroshi Motokawa
Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2014/12/22

Verifier

2014/12/22

Team leader

2014/12/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2014/12/22

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2014/12/22

20