JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the project

Low carbon hotel project in Vietnam: Improving
the energy efficiency of commercial buildings byutilization of high efficiency equipment

Reference number

VN003

Third-party entity (TPE)

TPE-VN-002

Japan

Quality

Assurance

Organization (JQA)
Project participant contracting the TPE

Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co.,Ltd.

Date of completion of this report

25/02/2016

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in the
Emissionsourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposed
JCM project.
emission
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
1

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Koichiro
Team
JQA
Ms.
TanabeleaderMr.
Sachiko
Team
JQA
Ms.
Hashizume
memberMr.
HiroshiInternal
JQA
Ms.
Motokawa
reviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
Through a review of the draft PDD, it was checked and confirmed that the PDD wascompleted using the latest version of the PDD form (JCM_VN_F_PDD_ver01.0)
appropriate to the type of project and drafted in line with JCM Guidelines for Developing
PDD and MR (JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver01.0).
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the PDD was completed using the valid form inline with the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The title of the proposed JCM project is “Low carbon hotel project in Vietnam:3

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Improving the energy efficiency of commercial buildings by utilization of high efficiency
equipment” (herein after referred to as the proposed JCM project).
The proposed JCM project aims to reduce CO2 emissions in the Socialist Republic ofViet Nam (herein after referred to as Vietnam) by introducing multiple energy efficiency
measures to existing commercial buildings. The proposed JCM project involves
installation of energy efficiency measures at two project sites, Hotel Nikko Hanoi[Location 1], and Renaissance Riverside Hotel Saigon in Ho Chi Minh City [Location 2].
For Location 1, three energy efficiency measures, namely, a high efficiency boiler, aheat recovery heat pump and LED lamps are to be installed. For Location 2, a highefficiency boiler is to be installed.
The project participant from Vietnam is Hochiminh City University of Natural
Resources and Environment (herein after referred to as HCMUNRE) and the project
participants from Japan are Hibiya Engineering, Ltd. and Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan
Stanley Securities Co., Ltd (herein after referred to as MUMSS).
The proposed JCM project is expected to achieve the amount of 289 tCO2e emission
reductions per annum. The estimated emission reductions of the period between 2016
and 2020 are calculated in the PDD.
The starting date of project operation is defined as 01/04/2016 and the expected
operational lifetime of the proposed JCM project is defined as 10 years.
The proposed JCM project has been selected as one of the JCM demonstration
projects by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization(NEDO). As a result of the financial support provided by NEDO's program,
implementation cost of the proposed JCM project will be partially provided by Japanese
government. Further, implementation of the proposed JCM project promotes technology
transfer of low carbon technologies in Vietnam. Through the NEDO program, operationof the high efficiency equipment will be monitored for a period set by the NEDO
program. During this monitoring period, knowhow transfer to the operators in Vietnam
for the optimum operation and utilization of the equipment is expected.
The validation team conducted desk review, interviews and an on-site visit to confirm
the accuracy and completeness of the project description. The documents reviewed
during the desk review are listed in Section E.2. of this report. The two-day on-site visit
to Vietnam was undertaken during 25-26 June 2015 including interviews with the project
participants and other stakeholders such as the local technical team of suppliers of the
project equipments. The interviewees including the project participants and otherstakeholders are listed in Section E.1.
Based on the findings through the process taken, CL01 was raised and resolved as
described below.
4

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL01)
As for the "expected operational lifetime of project" in Section A.5, it was confirmed
through interview with the project participant that the operational lifetime (10 years) was
derived from the legal durable years of each equipment and thus it is in line with thefinancial accounting rules under the regulation in Japan. However, it was not confirmed
whether it complies with the legal rules in the host country. Therefore, it is requested toclarify it accordingly.
(Summary of the response on CL01)
In accordance with “Guiding regulation on management, use and depreciation of fixed
assets, No.45/2013/TT-BTC, Ministry of Finance, Socialist Republic of Viet Nam”, timeframe of depreciation for the high efficiency equipment implemented by the proposed
JCM project is somewhere between 5 to 12 years. The operational lifetime stated in the
PDD falls between the duration suggested by the guidance.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL01)
It was confirmed through the review of the above mentioned document that the"expected operational lifetime of project", which is stated in Section A.5 of the PDD, iswithin a reasonable range of the host country's accounting rules for depreciation of the
project equipments. Therefore, CL01 was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the accuracy and completeness of the projectdescription were valid.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applies the approved methodology JCM-VN-AM003 "Improving theenergy efficiency of commercial buildings by utilization of high efficiency equipment"
Ver.01.0. This methodology was approved by JC on 14 January 2015. It is confirmedthat this methodology is applicable to the proposed JCM project and the applied versionof 01.0 is valid at the time of submission of the project for validation.
The fulfilment of each eligibility criterion defined in the methodology is confirmed bychecking the documentation referred to in the PDD and by reviewing comparable
5

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

information.
Criterion 1 : The project involves implementation of one or more energy efficiency
measures categorized in Table 1 by using high efficiency equipment at an existing
facility. Projects involving installation of high efficiency lighting need to be coupled withanother energy saving measure(s) in order to be eligible under this methodology. Highefficiency equipment introduced by the project replaces the existing equipment or
substitutes the output of the existing equipment, and it is included in the applicabletechnologies as shown in Table 1:
Table 1 Applicable Technologies
No Energy
Applicable technologies and their criteria
efficiency
measures
High efficiency boiler with the following features:
1
Energy- Energy efficiency is greater or equal to 93% (e.g. small
efficiency
improvement once -through boiler);by reducing - Equipped with automatic unit number control device; and- Individual performance test report is provided.
fossil fuelconsumption
Heat recovery heat pump using electricity, which generates
2
Fuel switch
to electricity both cooling and heating energy (temperature of hot water≥80°C) and uses non-HFC refrigerant with zero Ozone
and/or
Depletion Potential (ODP)
efficiency
improvement
LED lighting
3
Installationof highefficiency
lighting
Though reviewing supporting documents including the specifications, and the interview
with the local technical team of manufacturers of the project equipments, the project
information of Criterion 1 described in the PDD, was checked and confirmed with asatisfactory result, as below:
For Location 1, three energy efficiency measures, namely, a high efficiency boiler
manufactured by MIURA Co.,Ltd., a heat recovery heat pump manufactured by
Mayekawa MFG. Co.,Ltd. and LED lamps manufactured by Panasonic Corporation are
to be installed. For Location 2, a high efficiency boiler manufactured by MIURA Co.,Ltd.
is to be installed.
The installation of a high efficiency boiler is replacing the existing boiler at eachlocation. The applicability of the technology as energy efficiency measures 1 was
confirmed in the following manners;- It was confirmed through the review of technical specification issued by MIURA

6

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Co., Ltd. that the project boiler efficiency is greater than 93% (Lower calorificvalue).
- It was confirmed through interview with Maruse Engineering (V), which is the local
distributer of MIURA Co., Ltd., that the project boiler is equipped with automatic unit
number control device.
- It was confirmed through interview with Maruse Engineering (V) that the individual
performance test report is to be provided for the project boiler.
The installation of a heat recovery heat pump is replacing the existing boiler at
Location 1. The applicability of the technology as energy efficiency measures 2 wasconfirmed in the following manners;- It was confirmed through reviewing the technical specification issued by
Mayekawa MFG. Co.,Ltd. that the project heat pump generates both cooling andheating energy, and hot water temperature is 90°C, and uses R744(CO2) as
refrigerant.
The installation of LED lighting is replacing the existing lighting equipment at Location
1. The applicability of the technology as energy efficiency measures 3 was confirmed in
the following manners;- It was confirmed through the review of technical specification issued by
Panasonic Corporation that the project high efficiency lighting is LED.
Criterion 2: If the existing equipment is a chiller containing CFCs, HFCs, or HCFCs andis removed due to the project, a plan to prevent release of refrigerant used for the
existing chiller into the atmosphere is prepared. Execution of the prevention plan ischecked at the time of verification, in order to confirm that the refrigerant used for the
existing chiller is not released to the air.
Through the interview with the project participants and the local technical team ofmanufacturers of the project equipments, the project information of Criterion 2
described in the PDD, was checked and confirmed with a satisfactory result, as below:-It was confirmed through interview with Hibiya Engineering Ltd. and Mayekawa
Vietnam Co.,Ltd. ,which is the local subsidiary of Mayekawa MFG. Co.,Ltd., that the
project does not involve any removal of the existing chiller.
Criterion 3: High efficiency equipment in the project guarantees a better performance
than the reference equipment for a minimum of one year.
The performance level can be confirmed by comparing the efficiency or rated electricity
consumption between the high efficiency equipment and the reference equipment, with

7

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

an evidence of either a manufacturer’s performance guarantee or energy saving
company’s (ESCO) energy saving guarantee of high efficiency equipment. Where such
evidence is not available for the reference equipment, high efficiency equipment in the
project guarantees a better performance than the default efficiency values provided in
the methodology.
Though it is stated that “High efficiency equipment in the project guarantees a better
performance than the reference equipment for a minimum of one year” in the PDD,
there are no descriptions on the evidence to demonstrate the statement. Therefore,
CL02 was raised and resolved as described below.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL02)
As for "Criterion 3", it is requested to clarify whether the performance level of higher
efficiency equipment, compared to the reference equipment, can become evident witheither a manufacturer's performance guarantee or an energy saving company's
guarantee of high efficiency equipment.
(Summary of the response on CL02)
Manufacturer's guarantee for a minimum of one year along with the specification ofhigh efficiency equipment in the project has been provided as the evidence for eachhigh efficiency equipment.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL02)
It was confirmed through reviewing the submitted product guarantee for eachequipment that the guarantee period is one-year. On the other hand, it was confirmed
through the interview with the project participants that the regular maintenance service
for each equipment is to be provided once a half year. During the site visit, it was
confirmed through the interview with manufactures and distributers that themaintenance service for each equipment is to be provided by the local technical team ofthem. In addition, a maintenance check list for each equipment was provided.
Through reviewing the provided checking list and interviews with relevant stakeholders
it was confirmed that the maintenance services enable an expected performance level.
Based on the above-mentioned confirmation, it was considered reasonable that theperformance level of higher efficiency equipment, compared to the reference
equipment, was sufficiently demonstrated by "Manufacturer's guarantee for a minimumof one year along with the specification of high efficiency equipment in the project".

8

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Therefore, CL02 was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project meets each eligibility criterion of
JCM_VN_AM003_ver01.0 which is the latest version of the methodology at the time ofthe validation. The issues raised by the team were fully clarified, which resulted inrevision of the PDD. Therefore the team concluded that the project is eligible for
applying selected methodology and that the applied version is valid at the time ofsubmission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The sources of reference emissions are fossil fuel and electricity consumption byreference equipment. The sources of project emissions are fossil fuel and electricity
consumption by the project equipment, and electricity consumption by the auxiliary
equipment for the project equipment.
Through reviewing the relevant supporting documents and site visit, it is confirmedthat all emission sources covered in the applied methodology are included.
The

Monitoring

Plan

Sheet

(MPS)

has

been

prepared

by

using

JCM_VN_AM003_ver0.0.xlsx. The validation team confirmed that it is not altered, andits required fields are appropriately filled in.
As for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante, the validation team assessed
the estimated value for each of them by supporting documents including specifications
for project equipments and reference equipments and the most recent national gridemission factors. The validation team determined that all data sources and assumptions
were appropriate and calculations were correct as applicable to the proposed JCM
project, except for two parameters. Therefore, two clarification requests (CL03 andCL04) were raised on these findings.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL03)
As for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante, it is requested to demonstrate
through any evidential documents that the estimated value of the following fixed ex-anteparameter for Location 1 is reasonable.
-ECAj: Capacity of auxiliary equipment (hot water pump) for operation of heat pump9

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(Summary of the response on CL03)
Technical specification and a picture of the nameplate for the electric pump equippedin Location 1 have been submitted for review.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL03)
The estimated value for the fixed ex-ante parameter was confirmed as appropriate
through technical specification and the nameplate picture of the electric pump equippedin Location 1. Therefore, CL03 was closed.
(Issue raised as CL04)
As for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante, the following documents were
provided to determine whether all data sources of the estimated value for the fixed ex
ante parameters are appropriate:- Technical specifications of the project boiler issued by MIURA Co., Ltd.
- Technical specifications of the project heat pump issued by Mayekawa MFG.
Co.,Ltd.
However, the following documents were not confirmed:- Technical specifications of LED lighting
Therefore, it is requested to provide the TPE with them.
(Summary of the response on CL04)
Technical specifications and the calculated total capacity of LED lighting have been
submitted for review.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL04)
It was confirmed through the submitted technical specifications and the calculated
total capacity of LED lighting that the estimated value of relevant fixed ex-anteparameter (ECpj3,i) was calculated appropriately, and the calculation result was reflectedin the revised MPS(input). Therefore, CL04 was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team reached the conclusion that the selected emission sources and
GHG types were justified for the JCM project. The validation team assessed theestimated values for project-specific parameters to be fixed ex ante in the MPS andintermediate processes to derive the values. The issues raised by the team were fully
clarified, which resulted in a revision of the PDD and the MPS. As a result, thoseestimated values fixed ex-ante were considered reasonable in the context of the10

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

proposed JCM project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
It is confirmed through the review of the following documents that no environmental
impact assessment is required for the project.
- Decree No. 18/2015/ND-CP on Environmental Protection Planning, Strategic
Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental
Protection Plans<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the project design of the proposed JCM project
was in accordance with the regulation in Vietnam.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The project participants identified the direct stakeholders of the project are the hotels
where the project located, namely Hotel Nikko Hanoi and Renaissance Riverside Hotel
Saigon. Face-to-face interviews have been conducted to invite comments from thefacility management representatives of both hotels.
In addition to this, a briefing session for the project was conducted to invite commentsfrom government officials on 17th September 2014 at Hotel Nikko Hanoi.
It was confirmed through the submitted meeting minutes that the following local
stakeholders were invited to the briefing session.
 MONRE: Ministry of natural resources and environment
 DMHCC: Department of meteorology, hydrology and climate changes
 MOST: Ministry of Sciences and Technology
 IMHEN: Institute for meteorology, hydrology and environment
 MOT: Ministry of transport MOF: Ministry of finance MOIT: Ministry of industry and trade11

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The comments received at the meeting were fully taken into account and the results
were reflected in the PDD. It was confirmed through the interview with the project
participants that the above-mentioned process and due steps taken for the local
stakeholder consultation are appropriate.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the local stakeholder consultation of the proposed
JCM project was adequate.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
It is confirmed that the Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet isdescribed based on the applied methodology VN-AM003 ver 01.0.
It is confirmed that four monitoring points for Location 1 and one monitoring point for
Location 2 are indicated in Section C.2. of the PDD and they are corresponding to theparameters listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet. Regarding the monitoring equipments
and the means of monitoring including the monitoring frequency and the QA/QC
procedures, the validation team confirmed that those descriptions comply with therequirements of the methodology.
It is confirmed through the document review and interview with the JCM monitoring
manager whether the monitoring plan is feasible and the means of implementation of
the monitoring plan, including the data management and quality assurance and quality
control procedures, are sufficient for ex post reporting and verification.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that Monitoring Plan of the proposed JCM projectcomplied with the requirements of the methodology and/or PDD and Monitoring12

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Guidelines, and the project participants had ability to implement the described
Monitoring Plan including feasibility of Monitoring Structure Sheet.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
Through document review, it was confirmed that the Modalities of Communication(MoC), provided by one of the project participants, MUMSS, with whom JQA has acontractual relationship, had applied the latest version of MoC form. The date ofsubmission indicated in the MoC was 20/11/2015, and it was considered to be valid.
JQA also conducted interviews with the signatories of the Modalities of Communication(MoC), and then identified the personnel and their employment status, including thespecimen signatures. Therefore, JQA determined that the information of all project
participants, including the focal point provided in the MoC and its correctness ofauthority, was appropriate.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the MoC complied with all relevant forms andrequirements.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
It was confirmed preliminarily through review of the relevant website (e.g. UNFCCC
website, Markit Environmental Registry, etc.) that the proposed JCM project had notbeen registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms. The written
confirmation of the avoidance of double registration was also provided through thesigned MoC, and was cross-checked through interview with the project participants,
with a satisfactory result.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

13

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the proposed JCM project was not registeredunder the other international climate mitigation mechanisms at the stage of validation.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
In the PDD submitted for the invitation of public inputs as described in Section D, thestart date of operation is defined as 01/03/2016. In the revised PDD, the project
participants have changed the date to 01/04/2016 based on the updated schedule forthe project operation. Through reviewing the updated schedule for the proposed JCM
project provided by the project participants, it was confirmed that the project equipments
are to be handed over to those hotels before 29/03/2016. Therefore, the revised startdate of operation 01/04/2016 is reasonable and this date is not before January 1, 2013.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the start of the operating date of the proposed
JCM project did not predate 01/01/2013, and it had been defined appropriately.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No other issue was identified.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable.

14

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
The PDD of the proposed JCM project, which was submitted in line with the Project
Cycle Procedure, was made publicly available through the JCM website for public
inputs. The duration of call for public inputs on the PDD was 30 calendar days
subsequent to the publication of the PDD, and it started from 05/12/2015. The specific
JCM website is as below:
https://www.jcm.go.jp/vn-jp
D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the period of the public comments, covering
05/12/2015 to 03/01/2016; therefore, no action was required to be taken into due
account by the project participants.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees

Shinichi Itou, Director and Executive Officer, Energy and Smart Business
Promotion Head Office, Hibiya Engineering, Ltd.



Mitsuo Tomoyori, Consultant, Energy and Smart Business Promotion Head Office,Hibiya Engineering ,Ltd.



Susumu Nakano, Manager, Technology Research Centre, Hibiya Engineering ,Ltd.



Satoshi Nakamura, Senior Consultant, Clean Energy Finance Division, Mitsubishi
UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co.,Ltd.



Chisato Nakade, Consultant, Clean Energy Finance Division, Mitsubishi UFJ
Morgan Stanley Securities Co.,Ltd.



Tsutomu Kamiya, Managing Director, Mayekawa Vietnam Co.,Ltd.



Yutaro Sugiyama, Engineering Manager, Mayekawa Vietnam Co.,Ltd.



Yuya Kubo, Sales Director, Maruse Engineering (V)Issei Setoguchi, Maintenance Manager, Maruse Engineering (V)

Ho Thi Thanh Van, Dean, Office of Research Development and External Relations,
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Hochiminh City University of
Natural Resources and EnvironmentDinh Thi Nga, Vice-Head,Office of Research Development and External Relations,
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Hochiminh City University of
Natural Resources and Environment15

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

E.2. List of documents received
Project Design Document (draft) (LCH_JCM_VN_F_PDD_ver01_0_record.docx)Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (draft)(LCH_JCM_VN_AM003_ver01.0_Location1_hanoi.xlsx /LCH_JCM_VN_AM003_ver01.0_Location2_HCMC.xlsx)



JCM Approved Methodology VN_AM003 “Improving the energy efficiency ofcommercial buildings by utilization of high efficiency equipment”(JCM_VN_AM003_ver01.0.pdf)

Form of Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet(JCM_VN_AM003_ver01.0.xlsx)



JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_VN_Glossary_ver01.0)



JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_VN_GL_PDD_MR_ver01.0)



JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_VN_PCP_ver02.0)

Implementation Document for The JCM demonstration and verification project Low
Carbon Hotel: A new building energy management system for Vietnam (V-BEMS)Specifications of oil fired boilers of Miura EZ-1000SKBrochure of heat-pump water heater Unimo manufactured by Mayekawa

Brochure of LED lighting by PanasonicWarranty certificate for project boilers



Purchase and sales agreement including warranty terms for project heat-pumpwater heaterWarranty certificate for project LED lighting

Inspection report form for project boiler

Maintenance checking list for project heat-pump water heaterDecree No. 18/2015/ND-CP on Environmental Protection Planning, Strategic
Environmental Assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental
Protection Plans

A minutes of the stakeholder consultation meeting (held on 17/09/2014)



Specifications of reference boilers indicating fuel typeSpecification of reference lighting equipment

Specification and picture of nameplate for EBARA centrifugal pumps

Vietnamese national grid emission factor for 2013



IPCC default value from “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories”



Low No. 55/2014/QH13 on Environmental ProtectionSpecifications of multiple installation controller MP1-200.MT1-200
16

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Explanation on automatic unit number control deviceSample of Boiler commissioning test dataBrochure of heat-pump water heater Unimo manufactured by Mayekawa written in
Vietnamese

Mayekawa Vietnam company profile and organization chartGuiding regulation on management, use and depreciation of fixed assets,
No.45/2013/TT-BTC, Ministry of Finance, Socialist Republic of Viet NamContract between MUMSS and HCMUNRE on the support service for themonitoringIntroduction of HCMUNRE

Schedule of the project version 4.0



Revised Project Design Document (ver.02.0)



Revised Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (ver.02.0)

17

JCM_VN_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.

18