JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of Ultra-lightweight Solar Panels forPower Generation at International School

Reference number

KH001

Third-party entity (TPE)

Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Asian Gateway Corp.

Date of completion of this report

21/12/2017

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in the
Emissionsourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposed
JCM project.
emission
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
impactimpact assessment, if required by the Kingdom ofassessment
Cambodia, in line with Cambodian procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to
consultation
engage stakeholders and solicit comments for the proposed1

JCM̲KH̲FttVЪ l̲Rep̲ver01.0

Item

No CAR oFCL

Validatiop requirelne,ts

remalningproicct.

Ⅳlonitoring

The dcscription of the NIIon■ orillg Plan(Ⅳ 〔onitOring Plall

Shcct and Monitoring Strllcture Sheet)iS bascd on tlle
approved methodology and/or Guidclincs for Developing

the Joint Crediting Mechanism(JCM)PraCct DeJgll
Documcnt,Monitoring Plan,and Monitoring RcpOlt.

図

Thc monitoring poillts for llleasurement are appropriate,aswell as n/11etller the b/pes of equiplnent to be installed areappropriatc ifncccssarvl

All inputs on the PDD of the proposed JCⅣ l prac∝

Public inputs

vith tllc Pro」 cct Cycle Proccdurc aresublnittcd in linc 、図taken into duc account bv the proiect participants.

Of

The corporate idenjサ ofaH prttect partidpallts and a focJ

communications

poillt,as、 vcll as thc personal identitics,including spccilnen

Ⅳlodalities

signatures and emploシ γnent status, of their authorized図

signatories are included in tlle ⅣloC.

Tllc Ⅳ[oC has bccn corrcctけ complCted alld duly
authorized.

Avoldanceof

double

図The proposed JCヽ l praCCt is not registered under otller
intcmational climatc lnitigation incchanisms.

図re21stration
Stそ

ut

of

ooeration

Thc TPE validatcs thc start of the opertting date of theorooosed JCNII oroiect.

図

Ms.□

ALlthOrised sittatory:

Mr.図Last name:Chiba

First namc:Michiaki

Title:Climate Change Ⅳlanager― Asia&Paciflc

Date:21/12/2017

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Mr.
Ms.

Name

Company

Function*

Michiaki
Chiba

LRQA Ltd.

Team leader

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Internal
Stewart Niu LRQA China
Ms.
reviewer
Mr.
Ms.
Mr.
Ms.
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*
Technical
competenceauthorised

On-sitevisit

N/A* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The initial version of PDD was checked and confirmed as complete against the JCM Guidelines
for Developing Project Design Document (PDD) and Monitoring Report (MR) No.
JCM_KH_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0. A valid form of the JCM PDD Form as of the time ofcommencement of the public comment period No. JCM_KH_F_PDD_ver02.0 was used for the
PDD Version 01.0 dated 11/09/2017.
The completeness was also checked for the revised PDD Version 02.0 dated 15/12/2017 against
the updated JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document (PDD) and Monitoring
Report(MR)

No.

JCM_KH_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0

and

JCM

PDD

Form

No.

JCM_KH_F_PDD_ver03.0.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>3

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PDD was completed using the valid form of the JCM
PDD Form and in accordance with the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The project is to introduce 200 kW solar power generation system on rooftop of buildings of theInternational School of Phnom Penh (ISPP) in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The electricity
generated by the project solar power generation system is self-consumed and reduces GHG
emissions from generation of grid electricity that is imported by ISPP in the absence of the JCM
project. The project solar power generation system employs the photovoltaic module applying
ultra-lightweight solar panel Lightjoule of Asahi Glass Co., Ltd., Japan.
The project is implemented by ISPP and Asian Gateway Corp. from Japan. The start date ofproject operation is on 01/08/2016 and the expected operational lifetime of the project is for 17
years. The PPs referred to the Statutory useful life for the calculation of depreciation andamortization for machinery and equipment issued by Japan’s Ministry of Finance for the basisof the expected operational lifetime of the project solar power generation system indicated asfor 17 years (the other facilities mainly made of metal for education industries), while theperiod of depreciation applied by ISPP for tangible properties is for 20 years. The project solar
power generation system applying the state-of-art design of the Japanese leading manufacturer
will have a longer operational lifetime with sound operation and maintenance activities, but thePPs selected shorter lifetime specified by the applicable regulations. That is conservative andconsidered acceptable as it fulfils the duration of the crediting period.
The project receives financial support for JCM model projects from the Ministry of theEnvironment, Japan. The PP from Japan contributes in transfer of technology by provision of
capacity building on operation and monitoring.
The validation team assessed the PDD and the supporting documents, interviewed the PPs tovalidate the requirements concerning accuracy and completeness of the project description.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
Through the processes taken, CL 1 was raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CL 1
4

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify the date the project PV systemstarted operation and the estimated emission reductions in the first year of the operation.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs amended the start date of the operation to
01/08/2016 and revised estimated ERs in the first year of the operation.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team confirmed that the project solar PV systemstarted operation in August 2016 as described in the revised PDD based on the generation data
and the estimated ERs in the first year of operation has been re-calculated for the change. The
CL was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team assessed the project description provided in the PDD with the supporting
documents to the requirements on the accuracy and completeness. The validation teamconfirmed that the proposed JCM project in the PDD is described in accurate and completemanners that is understandable the nature of the proposed project activity.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applied the approved methodology JCM_KH_AM002_ver01.0 "Installation ofSolar PV System" Ver 01.0.
LRQA assessed if the selected methodology is applicable to the proposed project. The projectapplicability was checked against each eligibility criterion in the selected approved
methodology. The steps taken to validate each eligibility criterion and the conclusions about its
applicability to the proposed project are summarised as below.
Criterion 1: The project installs solar PV system(s).
Justification in the PDD: The project installs 200kW green-field solar power system on the roofof the international school in Phnom Penh.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the project documentation,technical specification, the test and commissioning report, and the on-site visit and interviews
were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the
project installed solar PV system on the roof of buildings of ISPP and the criterion is met.
Criterion 2: The PV modules have obtained a certification of design qualifications (IEC 61215,
IEC 61646 or IEC 62108) and safety qualification (IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
Justification in the PDD: The PV modules installed in the project have been certified for IEC
61215, IEC 61730-1 and IEC 61730-2).
5

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification,
certificates of design qualifications and safety qualification, the test and commissioning report,
and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that the PV
modules of the project solar PV system have obtained the certificates in compliance with theinternational standards IEC61215, IEC61730-1 and IEC61730-2 as appropriate. The criterion
was therefore fulfilled.
Criterion 3: The equipment to monitor output power of the solar PV system(s) and irradiance isinstalled at the project site.
Justification in the PDD: Electricity meter and pyranometer have been installed at theinternational school to monitor output power and irradiance respectively.
Steps taken for assessment: Document review was conducted on the technical specification, thetest and commissioning report, and the on-site visit and interviews were conducted at the
project site.
Conclusion: Based on the validation processes taken, the validation team confirmed that themonitoring equipment has been installed for output power of the solar PV system as well as
irradiance at the project site. Thus the criterion was confirmed as satisfied by the project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project applied the valid version of the approved
methodology and the applicability was demonstrated to the eligibility criteria as appropriate.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The project supplies electricity generated by 200 kW solar power generation system installed on
the rooftop of school buildings for the self-consumption and displaces electricity purchasedfrom the public power grid system.
ISPP has implemented the project to install rooftop solar power generation systems in twophases. The phase 1 included total 200 kW solar power generation system on the roof of theSecondary School Building A and the Black Box Theatre building and it is applied for thevalidation to be registered as a JCM project. The phase 2 included total 800 kW solar power
generation system on the roof of the other buildings of ISPP and the construction completed in
March 2017.
6

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The 200 kW solar power generation system proposed as a JCM project and 800 kW solar power
generation system supply electricity for self-consumption by facilities of ISPP and reduce
import from the public electricity grid. Approximately 60% of the total electricity consumptionof ISPP is supplied by the solar power generation system on weekdays. There are 2 x 1,500 kVA
diesel power generators in the school to back up electricity supply from the public electricity
grid system.
The project 200 kW solar power generation system together with the Phase 2 800 kW solar
power generation system is controlled the output electricity to match with the level of electricity
consumption by the school facilities and stops when the total electricity consumption of theschool facilities falls below 20 kW in order to prevent reverse electricity flow into the diesel
power generators and the public electricity grid under current situation that ISPP is discussing
with the electricity company off-taking of surplus electricity. There is more electricity demandthan 20 kW for basic consumption of the school facilities, such as air-conditioning in the school
offices and server rooms, even on the school holidays and the solar power systems are operated
for 365 days a year under normal conditions.
The source of GHG emissions is consumption of grid electricity and CO2 emissions in thereference scenario are considered to determine the reference emissions (REs), while the projectemissions (PEs) are assumed to be zero for the solar PV system in accordance with the applied
methodology. The annual electricity generation of the project is estimated ex-ante at 296.6
MWh. The estimation is based on the information from the technology supplier, the site
conditions and public information in the host country. The default CO2 emission factor for the
PV system connected to the national grid of 0.353 t-CO2/MWh is applied. The annual GHG
emission reductions (ERs) are calculated using the estimated annual electricity generation of the
project: ERs = REs – PEs = 296.6 MWh x 0.353 – 0 = 104.7 t-CO2e. The project started
operation from 01/08/2016 and the ERs in the first year of operation are estimated based on theestimated electricity generation in August to December as: 115.4 MWh x 0.353 – 0 = 40.7
tCO2e.
The validation team assessed the documented evidence and confirmed that all the relevant GHG
emission sources covered in the applied methodology are addressed, and the steps taken and theequations applied to calculate REs for the proposed project comply with the requirements of theapproved methodology.
Through the processes taken, CAR 2 and CL 2 were raised as the resolution detailed below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 2
7

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Nature of the issue raised: The PPs selected default reference CO2 emission factor of 0.533
tCO2/MWh for the project solar PV system but the PV system of the proposed project isconnected to the national grid.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs confirmed that the project solar PV system isconnected to the national grid and the default reference CO2 emission factor of 0.353
tCO2/MWh is applied in the revised calculation.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team confirmed that the default reference CO2
emission factor of 0.353 tCO2/MWh is applied in the revised PDD and the monitoring
spreadsheet. The estimated annual ERs of the project is changed to from 158 tCO2 to 104 tCO2.
The CAR was closed.
Grade / Ref: CL 2
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify relevance of ex-ante estimation of
GHG emission reductions. The electricity generation of the project PV system by the time ofvalidation on site visit seemed to be in a lower level than the estimation by the technology
provider due to the restriction to prevent a reverse power flow to the public electricity grid
system when the level of internal electricity consumption is low e.g. on holidays.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs clarified that the current level of electricity
generation is low but negotiation with the electric power company is underway to allow surplus
electricity to flow into the public electricity grid system upon agreement and the level ofelectricity generation used in the ex-ante estimation of ERs is expected to be achieved.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team confirmed through interviewing the PPs that
the PPs are under discussing off-taking of surplus electricity by the electric power company.
The validation concluded that the estimated ERs do not need to be changed at the stage eventhough the actual generation in the first year of operation is in a lower level. The CL was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that:- The methodology was applied correctly to calculate PEs and REs and no other significant
emission source was identified that would be affected and reasonably attributed by
implementation of the proposed project but not addressed by the applied methodology;- The choice of whether an emission source or gas is to be included where the applied
methodology allows was reasonably justified by the PPs;
- The Monitoring Plan Sheet (MPS) was not altered and the fields were filled in as required sothat all estimates of the REs could be replicated using the data and parameter values provided in
the PDD;- The values for the project specific parameters fixed ex ante listed in the MPS were appropriate
8

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

with all the data sources and assumptions and the calculations were correct to the proposed
JCM project;- All assumptions and data used by the PPs were listed in the PDD, including their references
and sources; and- All values used in the PDD were considered reasonable in the context of the proposed JCM
project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The proposed project is to install 200 kW solar power generation system on rooftop of theexisting school buildings and an environmental impact assessment is not required by laws of thehost country. The validation team assessed the applicable legal requirements in the host country
using its local sources/expertise and confirmed that an environmental impact assessment is not
required to be conducted for implementation of the project.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed by assessing the relevant documents and using the local
sources/expertise that the project does not need an environmental impacts assessment to be
conducted to meet the legal requirement of the host country and the PDD satisfies therequirements of the JCM.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs identified the staff of ISPP working at the project site as the main local stakeholders
and held a consultation meeting. The staff of ISPP attended the meeting provided comments
mainly related to the monitoring activities and the validation. No negative issue was raised
through the process.
The details of the persons interviewed and documents reviewed are provided in the Section E ofthis report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
9

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the PPs have invited comments to the proposed project fromthe relevant local stakeholders, the summary of the comments received is provided in the PDD
in a complete manner and the PPs have taken due account of all the comments received fromthe local stakeholders as the processes described in the PDD.
C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The MP consisting of the MPS and Monitoring Structure Sheet (MSS) is based on the approved
methodology. The Case 1 is selected for calculation of REs following the applied methodology.
The project PV system does not supply electricity to a national grid but the annual businessdays of the facilities to which the project PV system supplies electricity are 365 days or 366
days. School facilities need electricity supply including the school holidays, e.g. forair-conditioning in the school office, server rooms, etc. Total quantity of the electricity
generated in the project is the parameter to be monitored ex-post in the Case 1.
The electricity generated by the project solar power generation system is directly andcontinuously measured by electricity meters. Electricity meters are installed to measureelectricity generation from the solar PV modules on the roof of Secondary School Building A
and Black Box Theatre. Type approval is provided for the electricity meter in compliance withIEC 62053-22 and the accuracy class is 0.5s.
The roles and responsibilities of the persons are described in the MSS in accordance with therequirements of the applied methodology. The reading results of electricity meters are monthly
recorded, checked by the Operation Administrator, ISPP Director and General Manager (Asian
Gateway).
The validation team confirmed that the MP complied with the requirements in the approved
methodology and that the PPs will be able to apply the MP following the monitoringarrangements described in it. CAR 1, CL 3, and CL 4 were issued that the details of resolution
are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 1
Nature of the issue raised: The MPS needs to be completed for the monitoring parameter (1)The total quantity of the electricity generated with the specific information applicable for the
project:10JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

1) Whether the monitoring option B or C is applied,2) Whether invoice/receipts or measured data is applied as the source of data,
3) Whether the reading of electricity meters is recorded manually or electronically, and
4) Details of the measuring equipment on accuracy level.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs revised the relevant parts of the MPS as
below.
1) The Monitoring Option is specified as Option C.
2) Source of Data is specified as Measured data.
3) The Measurement method and procedures are added confirmation that the data of electricity
generation is measured and recorded electronically.
4) The accuracy level of the electricity meter is indicated as 0.5s.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MPS and confirmed therequested information specific to the project is filled for the monitoring parameter. The CAR
was closed.
Grade / Ref: CL 3
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify how the PPs ensure that data
monitored and required for verification and issuance be kept and archived electronically for two
years after the final issuance of credits.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs confirmed that the monitored data will be
kept and archived electronically for two years after final issuance of credits and it was added in
the revised MPS.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MPS and confirmed therequested information specific to the project is filled for the monitoring parameter. The CL wastherefore closed.
Grade / Ref: CL 4
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to clarify responsibility and procedure formanaging monitoring points to maintain and control measuring instruments.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs revised the MSS and added description of
responsibility by Operators to conduct maintenance of electricity meter.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MPS and confirmed therequested information specific to the project is filled for the monitoring parameter. The CL wasclosed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MP was described in compliance with the requirements
11

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

of the approved methodology and the Guidelines for developing PDD and MR, and the PPs
have demonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure and their ability to implement the MP.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was submitted to LRQA in the form JCM_KH_F_MoC_ver01.0. The MoC nominates
Asian Gateway Corp. as the focal point and was signed by the authorized representatives of all
the PPs with the contact details. The form used is the latest one as of the time of validation. The
validation team assessed the personal identities including specimen signatures and employment
status of the authorized signatories through directly checking the evidence for corporate andpersonal identity of the PPs and their authorised signatories. The validation team also confirmed
through reviewing the corporate information of the PPs and by meeting the persons representing
the PPs that the information provided in the MoC is correct.
CAR 3 was issued that the details of resolution are as described below.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Grade / Ref: CAR 3
Nature of the issue raised: The PPs were requested to re-submit the MoC completed with thecorrect information for the focal point entity and the other project participants.
Nature of responses provided by the PPs: The PPs submitted the MoC after amendments.
Assessment of the responses: The validation team reviewed the revised MoC and confirmed theinformation of the PPs is corrected as appropriate.The CAR was closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the MoC was completed using the latest form after
assessment conducted on relevance of the MoC in compliance with the requirements of the
JCM Guidelines.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The validation team assessed and confirmed relevance of the written confirmation in the MoC
from the PPs that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms.
The team in addition to the interviews with the PPs checked publicly accessible information of
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Joint Implementation (JI), Verified Carbon Standard
12

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(VCS) and Gold Standard (GS) and found no identical project as the proposed JCM project interms of the name of entities, applied technology, scale and the location. The result ofresearches confirmed that the proposed project was not registered under the other international
climate mitigation mechanisms than JCM and it will not result in a double counting of GHG
emission reductions.
The details of the persons interviewed and the documents reviewed are shown in the Section Eof this report.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No issue was raised to the requirements of this section.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the proposed JCM project was not registered under the otherinternational climate mitigation mechanisms.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
The start date for the operation of the proposed JCM project is indicated in the PDD as
01/08/2016.
The validation team confirmed correctness/relevance of the information by reviewing the
supporting evidence, including but not limited to assessing of the contracts and commissioning
report, and that the date is not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Please refer to CL 1 in the above section C.2. The start date of the project operation waschanged from 01/10/2016 to 01/08/2016 in the revised PDD.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the start date of operation of the proposed JCM project is
01/08/2016 and not before 01/01/2013 as required to be eligible as a JCM project.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No issue was identified as relevant element not covered above.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
Not applicable13

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD is to be made publicly available for 30days to invite public comments. The PDD was made publicly available in line with therequirements of the procedure for the period of 14/09/2017 to 13/10/2017 as per
https://www.jcm.go.jp/kh-jp/projects/30.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the above period to receive public inputs.
Thus no action was required to be taken by the PPs to satisfy the JCM requirement.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees
International School of Phnom Penh (ISPP)
Michael Hodgson, Operations Administrator
Sam Ol Kong, Building/Ground Manager
Vichet Kem, MEP Engineer, Maintenance
Asian Gateway Corporation
Tomonori Kimura, Founder & CEO
Yuma Nagata, Director, International Consulting Department
Ly Bunheng, Application Engineer, Energy Division
Meach Makara, Sales Manager, Project Development
Environmental Resource Management (ERM) Japan Ltd.
Tsuyoshi Nakao, Group Leader, Sustainability Management Team14

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

E.2. List of documents received
Category A documents (documents prepared by the PP)- PDD Version 01.0 dated 11/09/2017 with the monitoring spreadsheet- Revised PDD Version 02.0 dated 15/12/2017 with the monitoring spreadsheet- MoC dated 24/10/2017 and revised one dated 22/11/2017- Project implementation plan and schedule- Installation details and authorization request of system design and connection to mainelectricity distribution system of ISPP, Solar Partners Asia
- Delivery specifications for 200 kW Asahi Glass Solar System ISPP Phase 1, Solar Partners
Asia- EPC contract agreement- Specification of photovoltaic module, Light joule, Asahi Glass Co., Ltd.
- Specification of String Inverter SUN2000-33KTL, Huawei- Technical specification of DIRIS A20 Multifunction meters - PMD, Socomec S.A.
- Technical specification of Silicon-cell Pyranometer, Kipp & Zonen BV- User manual- Photographs of project construction- Estimation of solar power generation- Useful lifetime based on the act of Japan’s Ministry of Finance for calculation of useful
lifetime for depreciation and amortization- Depreciation period of solar power generation system- Commissioning Report, Sharp Solar Solution Asia Co., Ltd.
- Asahi Glass Limited Warranty Certificate- Huawei String Inverter Warranty and Service Condition- Single Line Diagram- Certificate by TUV Rheinland No. PV 50285520 to IEC 61215:2005 dated 23/06/2014- Certificate by TUV Rheinland No. PV 50285522 to IEC 61730-1:2004 and IEC 61730-2:2004
dated 23/06/2014- Attestation of Conformity No. AC 1039 PRO, Socomec S.A. dated 04/07/2011 for DIRIS A20
following specifications IEC 62053 class 0.5s active energy- Explanation on the monitoring structure and process- Sub-degree #72 ANRK.BK on Environment Impact Assessment Process (PDF) 990881,
Council of Minister for the Development of Cambodia dated 11/08/1999- Report of local stakeholders’ consultation meeting dated 07/09/201715

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Category B documents (other documents referenced)- JCM_KH_AM002_ver01.0 Installation of Solar PV System, Ver 01.0
- JCM Project Cycle Procedure JCM_KH_PCP_ver03.0- JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification JCM_KH_GL_VV_ver01.0- JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR JCM_KH_GL_PDD_MR_ver02.0 and
JCM_KH_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0- JCM Glossary of Terms JCM_KH_Glossary_ver01.0- JCM PDD Form JCM_KH_F_PDD_ver02.0 and JCM_KH_F_PDD_ver03.0- JCM MoC Statement Form JCM_KH_F_MoC_ver01.0- JCM Validation Report Form JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Approved Small Scale CDM Methodology AMS I.D. Version 18.0 Grid connected renewableelectricity generation- Approved CDM Methodological Tool to calculate the Emission Factor for an electricity
system- Proposed and registered projects under CDM, VCS, Gold Standard, and the other international
schemes- IEC 62053-22:2003, Electricity metering equipment (ac) - Particular requirements. Part 22:
Static meters for active energy (classes 0,2 S and 0,5 S)

16

JCM_KH_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers.
Certificate of Appointment is attached to this report.

17

Joint Crediting Mechanism Certificate of Appointment
Title of Project: Validation for Introduction of Ultra-lightweight Solar
Panels for Power Generation at International School (KH001)

We hereby certify that the following personnel have engaged in the validation process thathas fully satisfied the competence requirements of the validation of the JCM project.

Name of Person

Assigned Roles

Michiaki Chiba

Team Leader

Stewart Niu

Technical Reviewer

Signed byMichiaki Chiba
Climate Change Manager – Asia & Pacific
10/10/2017

Lloyd's Register Group Limited, its affiliates and subsidiaries, including Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Limited (LRQA), and their respective
officers, employees or agents are, individually and collectively, referred to in this Legal Section as 'Lloyd’s Register'. Lloyd’s Register assumes noresponsibility and shall not be liable to any person for any loss, damage or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice in thisdocument or howsoever provided, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd’s Register entity for the provision of thisinformation or advice and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract.

MSBSF43618

Revision 0, 20 November 2014