ADRC Highlights
Asian Disaster Reduction Center Monthly News
● Promoting Cooperation with Member Countries
Vol. 362
May2023
TOPICS
Promoting Cooperation
with Member Countries
Asian Conference on
Disaster Reduction 2022(ACDR2022): Session 1-3

Participation inInternationalConferences

Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction 2022 (ACDR2022): Session 1-3

Following the last month's issue (No. 361), this issue reports on Session 1, 2 and 3of the Asian Conference on Disaster Reduction (ACDR) 2022, which took place in
Sendai, Japan, in March 2023.
Session 1: Large-Scale Disasters and Countermeasures
This session shared information on the current situations of large-scale disasters
and the responses to them. Disasters are intensifying around the world due to theclimate change, increasing economic damages caused by the progress ofurbanisation and impacts of the cascading and compounding risks. Furthermore,
the session provided an opportunity to learn about disaster risk management(DRM) systems, including a more effective pre-disaster investment in DRR andDRM measures.

Technical workshop:
validation of the prototype
for the new losses anddamages tracking system

Speakers of Session 1

Asian DisasterReduction Center
Higashikan 5F, 1-5-2
Wakinohamakaigan-dori,Chuo-ku, Kobe
651-0073 Japan
Tel: 078-262-5540
Fax: 078-262-5546
editor@adrc.asia
https://www.adrc.asia© ADRC 2023

Dr SAKAMOTO Mayumi (Professor, Graduate School of Disaster Resilience andGovernance, University of Hyogo) moderated this session. In her introduction, she
stressed the importance of improving the countermeasures for large-scale disasters.
Water-related disasters are getting more frequent and intense, such as seen in theunusually prolonged floods that occurred in Pakistan in 2022. Earthquakes, such as
those in Türkiye and Syria in February 2023, have unknown dynamics andunpredictable occurrence. It was noted that the impact of these disasters often crossnational borders affecting people living in different countries.
Dr ARASHIMA Chizu (Professor, International and European Union Law, Facultyof Global Communication, Kobe Gakuin University) presented the issues intransboundary disaster governance from the perspective of international law. She
highlighted the importance of science-based data in negotiating treaties or bilateralagreements between countries on addressing transboundary disasters.
Mr Saleem Shahzad Malik (Director, Disaster Risk Reduction, National Disaster
1

ADRC Highlights

Vol. 362

Continued

Management Authority, Prime Minister’s Office, Pakistan) presented the disaster risk reduction and climatechange adaption activities in Pakistan. In particular, the government is strengthening its disaster management
system to address extreme events such as the prolonged and devastating floods in 2022. Additionally, thegovernment has been adopting new technology in disaster risk management as well as utilising scientific data
to further enhance its disaster risk reduction strategies.
Dr Le Minh Nhat (Deputy Director, Department of Natural Disaster Response and Recovery, Vietnam
Disaster Management Authority, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Vietnam) presented anoverview of the disaster risk management system in Vietnam. He said that flood is the most frequent type ofdisaster in the country. To address this, major financial and structural investments have been promoted inflood control and management. In fact, the National DRR Plan 2021-2025 puts greater priority inimplementing flood control projects.
Mr Serik Aubakiro (Acting Director, Center for Emergency Situations and Disaster Risk Reduction(CESDRR)) introduced roles and functions of CESDRR, which is a permanent intergovernmental body tohelp address transboundary disasters and emergencies. CESDRR was established through the agreement
between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic toachieve the following objectives: 1) cooperation in disaster risk reduction, prevention and elimination ofemergency situations; 2) mitigate factors of disaster risk, identify, assess, forecast and monitor emergency
situation hazards; 3) coordinate mutual efforts and strengthen preparedness for effective and timely responseto emergencies; 4) implement regional and international cooperation in DRR and emergency management;
and 5) increase the safety of life activities of the population during natural and man-made disasters.
Dr Sakamoto, in her conclusion of the session, acknowledged that this session made clear that information
sharing between countries of origin of the disaster and countries affected by that disaster is critical in
mitigating transboundary impacts. However, despite the urgency required for information sharing as disaster
response, there is no practical international communication system that can be used in emergency situations,since techniques and rules for natural disaster monitoring vary from country to country. One of her
suggestions is to establish an international risk communication system among relevant organisations toenhance transboundary disaster risk management.
Session 2: Broaden Our Horizons for Disaster Data Linkage in SFDRR Implementation: Applicationof GLIDE (GLobal IDEntifier Number)This session reviewed the current status of the disaster data management in Asia and introduced some tools
and practices to effectively deal with the data collected from wide range of stakeholders. It aimed atcontributing to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR) Target G-5: Number ofcountries that have accessible, understandable, usable and relevant disaster risk information and assessment
available to the people at the national and local level.
Mr Julio Serje (Consultant, ADRC and Director, RobotSearch Software Inc.) moderated this session. In theintroduction, he emphasized the challenges relating to disaster data management in disaster risk reduction.
There are still gaps among stakeholders on how damages and losses data are managed. On the other hand,most of the disaster data just remain aggregated and not put into use. These challenges exist on top of the factthat disaster data is getting more complex, and therefore, it is important to promote the establishment oflinkages among the various data management tools existing in the Asian region.
Dr Animesh Kumar (Head, UNDRR Office in Bonn, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction)
reported the progress in monitoring the SFDRR. He informed that as of February 2023, the cumulative
number of countries using Sendai Framework Monitor (SFM) to report on DRR progress amounted to 156.
The SFM targets and indicators are also finding application in several intergovernmental processes, while thedata has helped reporting on SDGs and are being used by partner organisations in thematic reports andprogrammes. The challenge in reporting is that developing countries, especially LDCs and SIDS, arestruggling to provide data to all targets and all indicators for the SFM. To help advance monitoring, newmodels and tools are being developed particularly in tracking of disaster losses and damages. The new modelis expected to link climate-related variables, losses and damages, and disaster events.
2ADRC Highlights

Vol. 362

Continued

Mr Demberelnyam Baasansuren (Director, Risk Management Department, National Emergency
Management Agency (NEMA), Mongolia) presented the practices and challenges of disaster data gatheringand sharing in Mongolia. One of those practices is the Spatial Information System that NEMA established in2019 in order to share hazard information nationwide. Among the challenges in data gathering are barriers in
distributing the registration templates and guidance to respective stakeholders for raw data collection. Inaddition, the human and technological capacities are insufficient to provide an understanding on thenecessity in collecting and generating reliable data. As way forward, NEMA will strengthen knowledge andunderstanding of data disaggregation and its importance through training and other outreach activities.

Speakers of Session 2Dr Chihun Lee (Senior Research Officer, National Disaster Management Research Institute, Ministry of theInterior and Safety, Republic of Korea) talked about the international cooperation on disaster risk reduction
focusing on early warning systems for floods. He highlighted the cooperation project carried out with thePhilippine government to install flood early warning systems putting emphasis on communication protocols.
Mr Rajesh Sharma, (Programme Specialist (Global) Disaster Risk Information and Application Crisis
Bureau, Bangkok Regional Hub United Nations Development Programme, Bangkok, Thailand) introduced
UNDP’s Digital Disaster Risk Reduction Maturity Model (DDRRMM). This is a tool that diagnose thematurity of the digital ecosystem of disaster risk reduction and management practices. In developing thistool, UNDP conducted an in-depth analysis of national disaster database systems to support the newgeneration of disaster data and information systems in line with the level of digital maturity of each country.
He highlighted the importance of digital and data governance for DRM, and this needs to be promoted
through legal and institutional frameworks, policies, strategies, action plans, and practical guidelines.
Mr Keith Paolo C. Landicho (Disaster Monitoring and Analysis Officer, ASEAN Coordinating Centre for
Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management) presented the evolution of the ASEAN Disaster
Information Network (ADINet), which is a repository of information on hazards and disasters that occurredin Southeast Asian region. ADINet has two types of linkages. One of them are “existing linkages” that
include: linkages for validation, linkages for research application, and linkages for coverage. The others are“external linkages” that include: linkages for integration and linkage for enhancement. ADINet’s linkage
with GLIDE fits under the linkages for integration.
Dr SHIOMI Yumi (Senior Researcher, Asian Disaster Reduction Center (ADRC)), presented the GLobal
disaster IDEntifier (GLIDE) improvements, particularly on open governance and better functionality. In
terms of governance, a steering committee was established in 2021 as well as the three subcommittees: API,SOP, and New Product Development. In terms of functionality, two new manuals were drafted andcrowdsourcing was introduced in 2022 to allow users to report “missing disasters in the GLIDE database.”
3ADRC Highlights

Vol. 362

Continued

Linkages of GLIDE with other disaster data management tools have been constantly coordinated, such as
linkage with Reliefweb, Sentinel Asia, UNOSAT, ADINet, and ESCAP.
The session featured the challenges for collecting, reporting and sharing disaster data and the practices tomanage it effectively. While the number of countries that reported its progress of implementing the SFDRR
has increased, it was found that there are still gaps in data collection and management at national and locallevels. To address these challenges, various tools have been developed by stakeholders. Linkages of various
data management tools need to be promoted.
Session 3: The Provision of Information via Satellite for Disaster and Crisis Management
This session provided an overview of the utilization of the Quasi Zenith Satellite System (QZSS) for disasterand crisis management (DC Report). It also presented the outcomes of QZSS DC Report demonstrations insome countries.

Speakers of Session 3Dr Gerald Potutan (Senior Researcher, ADRC and Visiting Associate Professor, Kobe University) moderated
this session. In many remote, mountainous, and island areas in Asia, people have limited or no access tointernet or cellular communications. Oftentimes, the warning information to evacuate does not reach thepeople at risk. Providing the warning information via QZSS helps address this challenge. It directly transmits
the message to: 1) individuals with receivers/terminals; 2) outdoor electronic facilities/boards; and 3) ground
receivers that activate community alarms (e.g., siren and beam lights).
Mr HONGO Nobuo (Deputy Director, National Space Policy Secretariat, QZSS Strategy Office, CabinetOffice, Japan) explained about the Satellite Report for Disaster and Crisis Management (DC Report) which isone of the services under QZSS. With this service, disaster management agencies can provide warning
information via QZSS satellites to communities-at-risk even in the absence of internet or cellular services. Asof December 2022, approximately 390 products are compatible with QZSS. Using some of these products(smartphone apps), demonstrations of QZSS utilization were conducted in Australia, Fiji, and Thailand.
Ms Runjie Gou (GIS Engineer, Social Innovation Division, NTT DATA Corporation) presented the outline
and progress of the QZSS Project, which is jointly implemented by five partner organizations: Cabinet Officeof Japan, NTT Data Corporation, Keio University, PASCO Corporation, Asia Air Survey, and ADRC. Ms
Gou said that the main purpose of the project is to create a system using the QZSS DC Report service that istailored to each country’s needs and environment as well as to conduct QZSS DC Report Demonstrations
before it officially starts operation in 2024. In the demonstrations, the project will identify requirements andissues for deployment of the system.
4ADRC Highlights

Vol. 362

Continued

Dr Hasi Bateer (Hasi Lab Director, Advanced Technologies Research Laboratory, Infrastructure Systems
Development Center, Asia Air Survey, Co. Ltd.) reported the outcomes of feasibility study for disaster
information system using QZSS. The study covers 21 countries in Asia and Pacific region, and investigated
the following: 1) conditions for receiving QZSS, 2) specific disaster cases and issues; and 3) Early Warning
System implementation needs. The outcomes highlighted information transmission issues, including:
distortion of information as it passes through many channels; delayed arrival of information; and limited
coverage of telecommunications network. In order to have an effective transmission of warning information,
the study recommended that following characteristics must be present in the information system: robustness,
immediacy, correctness, and comprehensiveness.
Mr ICHIKAWA Ryunosuke (Assistant Manager, Social Innovation Division, NTT DATA Corporation)
presented results of QZSS validations conducted in Thailand, Fiji, and Australia. In the Thailand, thescenario was forest fire. By using QZSS, rangers were able to receive information directly from QZSSwherever they are in the park. In Fiji, the scenario was tsunami, and station devices were able to receive thetransmission of QZSS and then further disperse the information by low power wide area network (LPWAN).
In Australia, the scenario was bushfire. Information from QZSS were received through smartphones.
Following up on this promising result, the next demonstration will be on a more practical application
including residents to receive messages on mobile terminals by using different communication methods (e.g.,Wi-Fi, LPWAN, and Bluetooth).
Ms Vasiti SOKO (Director, National Disaster Management Office (NDMO), Fiji) mentioned that one of thereasons for using QZSS in Fiji is due to its location in the Pacific Ocean, situated in between Vanuatu andSamoa which are also disaster prone countries, thus the disasters in these countries having a strong impact oneach other. Also, the risk communication system is still limited in Fiji. Since NDMO Fiji is strengthening its
disaster management system including early warning system, the utilisation of QZSS DC Report service inFiji is a welcome endeavor.
Mr Socheath So (Senior Technical Officer, The National Committee for Disaster Management (NCDM),Cambodia) introduced Cambodia's disaster risk management information system called Platform for Realtime Impact and Situation Monitoring (PRISM). This platform links the field assessment information, early
warning systems, satellite data, baseline population, and socio-economic vulnerability data to effectively
measure the risk and its impact. QZSS is expected to augment the PRISM by providing warning informationtransmission system that is tailored to the local environment.
Thank you very much to all the moderators and speakers for your contribution to the success of the sessions.
● Participation in International Conferences
Technical workshop: validation of the prototype for the new losses and damages trackingsystem

On 3-4 May 2023, ADRC attended the “Technical workshop: validation of the prototype for the new losses
and damages tracking system” held in Bonn, Germany. The workshop which was organized by UNDRR,
UNDP and WMO aimed to gather feedback from practitioners, experts and other losses and damages datastakeholders on the draft prototype of a new tracking system of the losses and damages data that is now inthe process of development. During the two-day workshop, over 80 participants actively exchanged opinions
in person and virtually about several issues of the new system such as functionalities, data analysis,visualization and administration. It is expected that the new system will ensure the use of data to generate
insights for comprehensive disaster and climate risk management and for risk-informed sustainable
development policy making and investment decisions.

5