Strengthening the National Research and Innovation Funding Agencies in West Africa (SRIFA)REPORT ON VALIDATION, CO-DEVELOPMENT AND CO-DESIGN OF TRAINING
PROGRAMME AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT WORKSHOP IN BURKINA FASO
Event Dates: 16-17 April 2024
Prof. Nicholas Ozor
Executive Director, African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS),
and SRIFA Principal Investigator,
Chancery Building, 8th Floor, Valley Road,
P. O. Box 10081-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
Email: executivedirector@atpsnet.org
Submitted to:
Dr. Matthew Wallace
Senior Program Specialist,
International Development Research Centre (IDRC)
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada.
mwallace@idrc.ca

INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background and Justification
The Science Granting Councils Initiative (SGCI) in sub-Saharan Africa recognizes the critical role of national
agencies in charge of funding of research and innovation referred to as Science Granting Councils (SGCs). The
SGCs are responsible for driving research and innovation (R&I) for social and economic development. In West
Africa, efforts are underway to strengthen existing SGCs where they exist as well as to establish new ones
where they do not exist to bolster R&I capacities in the sub-region. With support from the SGCI, the African
Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS) in partnership with the African University of Science andTechnology (AUST), is working to provide training and technical support to SGCs in Burkina Faso, Côte
d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and Sierra Leone. Preliminary studies conducted through desk reviews,
surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions have informed the development of draft reports
on each of the participating countries. With a 2-day validation and co-development workshop, the training needs
and technical support is refined and finalised for subsequent delivery of tailored training and technical support
to the Councils in the respective countries.
The landscape of R&I funding, policy, and practice is dynamic, requiring Councils or their equivalent in West
Africa to continuously evolve and build their capacities. Despite their dedication to R&I, these Councils or theirequivalent encounter challenges such as limited resources, policy inconsistencies, and knowledge gaps amongstaff. Existing training programmes often lack regional specificity and fail to address the unique needs of West
Africa. Worse still is that some countries in the sub-region are yet to establish a research and innovation funding
Council. Therefore, the proposed workshop aims to validate and refine training programme content by engaging
the Council staff or its equivalent in the participating countries in reviewing and providing feedback on
designed modules; prioritising topics relevant to emerging R&I trends. Additionally, to build capacity of theCouncils and/or establish a new Council where it does not exist, the workshop seeks to co-develop and tailor
technical support delivery approaches in collaboration with the relevant stakeholders; integrating innovative
methods such as blended learning and peer-to-peer exchange. It aims to foster ownership and commitment
among participants through active participation, open discussions, and shared decision-making, whiledeveloping strategies for long-term engagement and knowledge sharing. Furthermore, the workshop aims tostrengthen regional collaboration and partnerships by facilitating networking and communication between
Council representatives and identifying opportunities for joint research projects, policy initiatives, and resource
mobilisation within the sub-region.
1.2 Goal of the Validation and Co-Development of Training Programme Workshop
The goal of the workshop was to validate the preliminary results on policy and institutional landscape,comprehensive stakeholder mapping and analysis, and needs assessment of the research and innovation funding
ecosystem in the participating countries and co-develop a tailor-made training and/or technical support
programme for each of the Councils/funding agencies. Specifically, the Workshop seeks to:a) Validate the content and structure of the training programme designed to strengthen Science Granting
Councils in West Africa.
b) Facilitate collaborative refinement and prioritisation of needs in order to develop the training
programme through inputs from key stakeholders.
c) Foster knowledge exchange and peer learning among participants to enhance the effectiveness of
capacity-building efforts.

1d) Generate actionable insights and recommendations to ensure the relevance and impact of the training
programme.
1.3 Methodology for the Workshop
The workshop was held physically and virtually for the benefit of those unable to join physically inOuagadougou, Burkina Faso at Palm Beach Hotel. The workshop involved a two-day engagement session with
the Council and other relevant stakeholders including ministries and agencies in research and innovation
funding. The first day involved presentation and the validation of results and prioritization of training needs andtechnical support while the second day involved the co-development of training and technical support
programmes with the Council. This 2-day workshop employed highly interactive and collaborative approaches.
The project team actively participated in the workshop including Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo (ATPS), Dr.
Chukwuemeka Uwanaka (AUST), Alfred Nyambane (Programme Manager, ATPS) and Susan Mburu,(Communication and Outreach Officer). The team reviewed and refined the reports through presentations, group
discussions, and brainstorming sessions. The focus was on co-developing training delivery methods and tools
tailored to the Council’s preferred learning styles, national, and regional contexts. The workshop was expected
to foster ownership and commitment by encouraging open dialogue, shared decision-making, and strategies forlong-term engagement as well as gender equality and social inclusion. Additionally, the networking
opportunities are expected to facilitate regional collaboration and knowledge exchange among SGCs andstakeholders, strengthening R&I ecosystems across West Africa.
1.4 Expected Outputs and Outcomes of the workshopa) Validated and refined training programme tailored to the needs of Science Granting Councils in West
Africa.
b) Enhanced collaboration and mutual learning among stakeholders involved in research and innovation
funding within the sub-region.
c) Actionable recommendations for the effective implementation and sustainability of the training
programme and technical support.
DAY 1: UNDERSTANDING POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL LANDSCAPE, COMPREHENSIVESTAKEHOLDER MAPPING OF THE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION FUNDING ECOSYSTEM
The workshop commenced with registration of all participants, followed by general introductions. The generalframework for the event was then summarily explained, so that participants will be up to speed with their
expected responsibilities for the 2-day event. After these preliminaries, an overview of the research study on thefunding environment for science, technology and innovation in Burkina Faso as conducted by the ATPS and its
partner the AUST was presented. The prior expectation was that the feedback from participants will support thevalidation objective of the workshop.
The report on the study on the state of policies, the comprehensive stakeholder mapping and analysis, and theevaluation of the needs of the research and innovation funding ecosystem in Burkina Faso was presented by Dr.
Cynthia Nwobodo. She succinctly presented the major results of the study. Following the presentation, theparticipants wanted to understand the interest of the project for FONRID first and foremost. In response to thisquestion, Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo explained that her organization was mandated within the framework of SGCI tostrengthen FONRID's performance based on existing practices and the functioning of the council. She also2emphasized that it is not for them to define the direction for FONRID or the ministry, but rather to provide
technical support based on their experience to achieve FONRID's objectives in research and innovation funding.
Regarding the report, the participants proposed a review of the policy documents, taking into account the new
guidelines of the transition in government in terms of research. Thus, it was suggested to include in the report
the Action Plan for Stabilization and Development which was developed in 2023. They also suggested
removing certain documents whose implementation deadlines have passed to be in line with the study period.
These include the Priority Action Plan (PAP), the National Program for the Rural Sector (PNSR), and the
National Economic and Social Development Plan (PNDES). For these documents, the implementation period
had passed. The new strategic document was shared with the SRIFA team for inclusion in the report.
Discussions also focused on understanding and appreciating the level of influence and power attributed to thevarious research and innovation institutions in Burkina Faso. For some participants, this does not fully alignwith the observed reality. Dr. Cynthia thus explained the functioning of the analysis tool and how the correlation
is made based on the evaluation of the responses to the study questionnaire earlier distributed. Regarding theinstitutional landscape for funding, some participants noted that programs within the development ministries
also contribute to funding research in Burkina Faso, as do NGOs and private companies. After these
discussions, the participants validated the report, subject to incorporating the proposed amendments.
Some of the relevant policies and highlights from the report include;
The National Policy for Scientific and Technological Research (PNRST) 2013-2025: Launched in 2012, theNational Policy for Scientific and Technological Research has as its main objective to develop research anddevelopment and the application and commercialization of research results. The policy guides all scientific andtechnological research activities in Burkina Faso. It establishes for the creation of a national research fund tocoordinate research activities. The financial support for scientific research and innovation for sustainable
development was allocated to the National Fund for Development Research and Innovation (FONRID). The
PNRST is the guiding framework for government action in the sector for a ten-year period, allowing for it tocontribute to the effective implementation of new aspirations for growth and development (Lill and Gaillard,2014). Its key priority areas are to improve food security and self-sufficiency by boosting capacities inagricultural and environmental sciences.
The Priority Action Plan (PAP)2013-2015: the PAP outlines the government’s planned research activities for
departments. Its implementation aims to contribute to achieving the vision and direction of the science andtechnology sector by 2015. The PAP provides a framework for institutions and organisations to enable increased
efficiency and effectiveness of Ministry of Scientific Research and innovation’s (MRSI’s) activities in thecontext of sectoral policy. It focuses on acting as a reminder of PNRT’s broad vision; offering a presentation ofprogrammes and priority actions of PNRST, funding of PNRST, providing strategies for implementation,
monitoring and evaluation, and addressing assumptions and risk management (Lill and Gaillard, 2014).
The Science, Technology and Innovation Act (2013): This Act establishes three mechanisms for funding
research and innovation. The mechanisms are the National Fund for Education and Research, the National Fundfor Research and Innovation for Development, and the Forum of Scientific Research and Technical Innovation.
Funding comes from the national budget and various annual subsidies: 0.2% of tax revenue, 1% of mining
revenue, and 1% of revenue from operating mobile phone licences, and from royalties on sales from the resultsof research and the patent licence agreement concerning inventions funded by public funds.
The National Action Plan for the Development of Higher Education (PNADES) 2014-2023: Officiallyadopted in August 2014, the National Action Plan for the Development of Higher Education is aimed atproviding the government with a repository of programmes, monitoring and evaluation strategies and actions
that will be taken over the period of 2014-3023 for the benefit of higher education to ensure its quantitative and3qualitative development. It aims to improve key national indicators in order to provide the country with efficienthuman capital for socio-economic development.
Strategic Plan for Scientific Research and Technology (2015-2024): The objective of this plan is to create
favourable conditions to produce knowledge and technologies necessary for sustainable socioeconomic
development in Burkina Faso. The plan was elaborated as a response to some identified needs including: i)strengthen coordination, synergy, and coherence of research within the different institutes of the CNRST; ii)
greater linkage between the CNRST’s research programmes and major national development programmes; andiii) mainstream emerging themes through collaborative research programmes.
The Oriental Law for Scientific Research and Innovation (LORSI) 2013: The LORSI sets a legal frameworkand fundamental guidelines for scientific research and innovations in Burkina Faso. It sets the general rules
guiding the implementation of sustainable development in Burkina Faso.
Sectoral Research and Innovation Policy (PSRI) 2018-2027: Enacted in December 2017, the Sectoral
Research and Innovation Policy is aimed at strengthening the productive system of Burkina Faso through thegeneration and intensive use of research and innovation results. The policy is set to guide all players in the
research and innovation ecosystem of Burkina Faso.
National Strategy for the Valorization of Technologies, Inventions, and Innovations (SNVTII) 2020-2024:
The National Strategy for Valorization of Technologies, Inventions, and Innovations (SNVTII) is aimed atpromoting the intensive use of technologies, inventions, and innovations. The Objectives of the strategy are toensure the firm protection of technology of Inventions and Innovations (TII); make technologies, inventions andinnovations available and accessible to actors; set up and/or strengthen the valuing structures of TII and ensure
their functioning; develop specialised human resources for valuing TII; and ensure effective communication on
the valorization of TII (Banhoro et al. 2019). With SNTII, it is expected that by 2024, research results will bebetter valued and popularised for the socio-economic development of Burkina Faso.
The National Rural Sector Programme (PNSR) 2016-2020: This program is aimed at ensuring food andnutritional security through sustainable development of a productive and resilient agro-sylvo-pastoral, fishery,
and wildlife sector that are more market oriented. It provides guidance for sustainable funding of research
programmes for achievement of development goals. It also aims to strengthen the strategic and operational
capacities of research structures through the improvement of human resources and management systems.
The National Economic and Social Development Plan (PNDES 2016-2020): adopted in October 2016, theoverall goal of PNDES 2016-2020 is to achieve the structural transformation of the Burkinabe economy toattain strong, sustainable, resilient and inclusive growth that creates decent jobs and improves social welfare..
The PNDES 2016-2020 is a national reference for interventions by the State and its partners over the period
2016-2020. It aims at a cumulative growth in per capita income, reducing poverty, strengthening humancapacities and satisfying basic needs, within an equitable and sustainable framework. Among its major target
areas is to promote research and innovation to ensure structural economic transformation. In addition to thepolicy and institutional landscape presented, participants mentioned some few important institutions which were
not contained in the report including the Fiber and Textile Company (SOFITEX), NAFASO, and Projects andprograms of development ministries with external financing and within the framework of specific conventions.
A major observation after the presentation of the overview of the research study was that many participants had
no access to the study prior to the presentation, and were therefore unable to provide informed feedback tosupport the validation process. The complexities arising from the relative level of high staff turnover at
FONRID (the primary STI funding agency in Burkina Faso), was probably responsible for this scenario. The
lack of access to the study by some participants, meant that the programme of events was slightly adjusted toaccommodate this outcome. A commitment was made by the project team to share the report the same day, so4that more informed discussions could be made the following day. Some feedback was however received,
following the previous presentation.
The participants were further divided into two working groups to deliberate and work on the training needs andtechnical support and prioritize them according to their importance to FONRID. Resource mobilization was
identified as the top priority given the importance of grant requests not covered by the allocated budget,
followed by effective communication of research results, public-private partnership, quality assurance andresearch ethics, commercialization of research results, and gender equality and inclusion strategies. After
identifying these priorities, the group further justified their choices as presented in the following tables:
Priority Training Need Areas

Level ofPriority

Justification

Mobilization of resources, negotiation
techniques and granting

1st-Major concern, because the national financial
allocation for FONRID is insufficient to meet
research funding needs; necessary to explore othersustainable sources of financing.

Effective communication of research findings
Strategies for using evidence to inform policy,
such as writing a policy briefing note

2nd

- Make the results known to potential users

Private public partnership

3rd-Use research results to inform policies-Arouse private sector interest in research-direct research on private sector research priorities

Quality assurance and research ethics

4th- Equip research and innovation stakeholders on theissue of quality assurance and ethics

Commercialisation of research
results/Safeguarding intellectual property
rights

5th-Ensure research funding

Gender equality and inclusion strategies /Capacity building for gender-sensitive datacollection, management, reporting andarchiving

6th-Ensure the use of the results-Promote consideration of gender and inclusivenessin the granting of funding

The priority technical support and their justifications are presented below:
Priority Technical Support

Level ofPriority

Justification5

Support on advocacy for increased R&I
funding in the country from policymakers
and parliamentarians

1st

Political commitments were made by the political officeholders:- LORSI-mining fund,- 1% GDP commitment from Maputo-African
Union)
Advocacy to raise funds

Stakeholder engagements and policy
dialogue on topical issues of R&I funding
interests to the Council

2ndWithout the commitment of stakeholders, the funds
allocated to research will not be used to achieve theobjectives

Creation of physical and online platforms
for knowledge sharing among critical R&I
funding stakeholders in the country

3rd

Platforms to involve as many stakeholders as possible
to facilitate information sharing

Drafting of STI policy
documents/frameworks

4thDocuments for updating research themes but also futureadvocacy

Commissioning of studies on specific STI
issues relevant to Council

5th

Depending on the priorities defined in the research &innovation policy, studies will clarify the areas ofintervention of the Council

Organising benchmarking/learning visits toother well-performing Councils

6th

Sharing of information/experience and opportunity of
networking

Brokering STI agreements with otherCouncils and Actors in the ecosystem

7th

To crown commitments/responsibilities

As a guide for the next day, a framework comprising content, challenges, gender and social inclusion,sustainability, and cross-cutting issues was developed. This was presented to the participants to guidediscussions for the April 17, 2024 workshop.
DAY 2: CO-DEVELOPING AND CO-DESIGN OF TAILOR-MADE TRAINING PROGRAMME ANDTECHNICAL SUPPORTThe second day began on a more informed basis for the participants, as they had had some time to review theprevious study. The framework provided also ensured structured presentations and feedback, essentially ontechnical needs and training needs. For this activity, two working groups were formed: one group worked on
co-development and co-design of training programmes, while the other group worked on co-development andco-design of technical support. Regarding the prioritized training needs, each group was to brainstorm on eachof the priority areas under the five thematic areas of content, challenges, gender and social inclusion,sustainability, and cross-cutting issues.
The tables below present the expectations and insights from the participants on the prioritized training needs
and technical support in terms of content, challenges, gender and social inclusion, sustainability, andcross-cutting issues by the Burkinabe participants.

6

Table 1: Co-development and co-design of training programme to Strengthen FONRID
Training Need Areas

Content

Mobilisation of resources, - Elements ofnegotiation techniques
mobilisation ofand granting
financial resources-Fund trading
techniques-Technique for
writing a financing
requestChallenges

Solution

Gender/Inclusivity

Strengthen thefinancialcapacity of
FONRID tomeet subsidy
needs

Train FONRID
agentsGender and inclusion asmeans of resource
mobilisation

Developmobilisation tools

Promoting social justice

Low capacity interms ofresource
mobilisation-Project writing
technique to respond Insufficient
to calls for funding Tools formobilisation- Technique of-Low capacity insearching for andwriting Project
maintaining therequestpartnership
financing
Effective communication -Development ofof research findings \communications
Strategies for using
supports focused onevidence to inform policy, the results ofsuch as writing a policy
research projects
briefing note
- Strategy fordissemination/popul
arisation of project
results- Make theTrain FONRID
results known to agentsencourage theiruse
Develop
results-based-Influencecommunications
political
tools
decisions infavour of
research funding

Make research results
accessible to women,men, young people andvulnerable groups-Technique forcollecting evidence
to inform policies- Technique ofwriting politicalnotes focused on
project results
Private public partnership - Identification ofprivate partner

Getting theDevelop a digital
Expand the field ofprivate sector to platform forpossibilities/solutions byinteraction between

7

- Arouse the interest participate inresearchof the Private Sector funding research stakeholders andin research
the private sector

taking into accountgender and inclusion
Promoting social justice-Create a frameworkfor dynamic
public-private
dialogue
Quality assurance andresearch ethics

Commercialization ofresearch
results/Safeguarding
intellectual property
rights-Know the elements Finance qualityof quality in a
projects toresearch project
impactsocio-economic- Know the code of development
ethics andprofessional conduct
for researchTrain agents, theCST, expert
evaluators in theselection of quality
projects forfinancing-Know the rights
Promote the use
and the process ofof researchacquiring
results
intellectual property

Train agents, theExpand the field of
CST, expert
possibilities/solutions by
evaluators intaking into accountquality selection for gender and inclusion
financing
Promoting social justice-Know themechanisms oftechnology transfer
andcommercializationof research results
Gender equality andinclusion strategies /Capacity building for
gender-sensitive datacollection, management,
reporting and archiving-Technique forcollecting andmanaging data
sensitive to genderand inclusion inprojects-Advocacy on
gender equality andinclusion in the
granting of funding

Expand the field of
possibilities\solutions bytaking into accountgender and inclusion
Promoting social justice-Develop a guideand evaluation
criteria based on
quality assuranceInstitute positive Capacity building
discriminationin gender equality
measuresand inclusion data
focused on sex collection,
and age in the
management
selection andfinancing of
projects

Expand the field of
possibilities\solutions bytaking into accountgender and inclusion
Promoting social justice

Facilitate accessto financing forall8Co-development and Co-design of Technical Support to Strengthen the FONRID
Priority

Content

Priority 1: Support on advocacy forincreased R&I funding in the country frompolicymakers and parliamentarians

1- Technical assistant by external expertise
2- Strengthening the capacities of teams in terms of advocacy

Priority 2: Stakeholder engagements andpolicy dialogue on topical issues of R&I
funding interests to the Council

1- identification of challenges (MEL, funds), percentage to include
gender in financing based on the law
Financing sustainability: budget fluctuation, Prob: budget
sustainability
Devdocs on themes

Priority 3: Creation of physical and online
platforms for knowledge sharing among
critical R&I funding stakeholders in the
country

1.Facilitating networking and collaboration
2.Implementing effective knowledge classification systems
3.Building and maintaining a community of practicePriority 4: Drafting of STI policy
documents/frameworks

1.Stakeholder engagement and consultation
2.Writing clear and concise policy statements
3.Prioritizing resource allocation

Priority 5: Commissioning of studies on
specific STI issues relevant to Councils

1. Establishing project management frameworks
2. Monitoring progress and ensuring quality
3. Ensuring research ethics compliance

Priority 6: Organizing
benchmarking/learning visits to otherwell-performing Councils

1.Build relationships with counterparts in other agencies
2.Explore opportunities for joint projects or initiatives
3.Establish channels for ongoing knowledge exchange

Priority 7: Brokering STI agreements withother Councils and Actors in the ecosystem

1.Facilitate international research partnerships
2.Access global knowledge networks and expertise
3.Develop joint training programs and workshops

1. Conclusion
The political and institutional landscape in Burkina Faso gives great importance to research and innovation.
Funding efforts are therefore being deployed for the development of this field. Similarly, it is expected that
research results and innovations will contribute to the socio-economic development of the country. The
institutions set up in this framework work in tandem to make research an engine of socio-economic
development despite limited financial resources. After an analysis of FONRID's strengths and weaknesses, it
can be concluded that the training and technical support needs identified above are the gaps to be filled for theeffective functioning of the Council as well as the entire research and innovation ecosystem in Burkina Faso.
Indeed, substantial funds, committed policies and well-equipped actors are the basis for the development of the
expected research and innovation in Burkina Faso. As previously mentioned, high staff turnover at FONRID
stood out as a challenge, with its implications for sustainability. Though it is an extraneous factor for ATPS and
therefore beyond its orbit of control, concerted efforts are required to ensure that capacity is developed andsustained, within the Burkina Faso research and innovation funding ecosystem. Participants suggested that thetraining and technical support should accommodate staff from other sister agencies, ministries and parastatals toensure that capacities are retained in the ecosystem. The FONRID and other participants were asked to9nominate some countries in Africa they would like to visit, for shared lessons and capacity building. In
response, they asked to be given some time to provide the feedback.
References
Lill M. and Gaillard J. (2014). Science Granting Council Country Report: Burkina Faso. Accessed from:https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers14-04/010061547.pdf
Banhoro F. A., Nana R., Ouedraogo M. H., and Sawadogo M. (2019) Valorization of Research and Scientific
Innovation Results as Factor of Sustainable Development of African Agriculture: The Example of
Burkina.

A Group photograph of participants during SRIFA validation workshop in Burkina Faso

10

Table 4: Workshop Programme
Jour 1: Comprendre le système du financement de la recherche et de l'innovation 16 Avril 2024
Session du matin: Ouverture et aperçu general
9:00 - 9:30

Enregistrement

Susan
Mburu/Chukwuemeka/Représ
entant de CNC

9:30 – 9:40

Mots de bienvenue

Aminata Kabore

9:40 – 9:45

Presentation des participants

Tous les participants

9:45 -10:00

Discours d’ouverture.

Dr Jibrin Yonli

10:00-10:20

Présentation des objectifs de l'atelier et des résultats

Dr Cynthia Nwobodo

attendus.
10:20 - 10:30

Photo de groupe

10:30 – 11:00

Tous les participants
Pause-café

Session 1: Presentation des résultats préliminaires
11:00 – 11:45

Presentation du rapport du Burkina Faso

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

11:45 – 12:45

Session interactive de question-réponse.

Alfred Nyambane/Dr Cynthia
Nwobodo12:45 – 2:00

Pause déjeuner
Session de l’après-midi : Discussion de fonds avec les parties prenantes

2:00 – 3:30

3:30 – 4:00

Séances en petits groupes : Discussions des groupes de

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo/Alfred

parties prenantes sur la priorisation des besoins de

Nyambane/Dr. Chukwuemeka

formation et de soutien technique

UwanakaPrésentations des groupes sur les défis et les opportunités
identifiés.

4:00 – 4:30

Discussion plénière : Thèmes clés émergeant desengagements des parties prenantes.

4.30 – 6.00

Session de réseautage

Jour 2: Co-développement de programmes sur mesure 17 Avril 2024
Session du matin: Récapitulatif et Définition des objectifs
9:00 - 9:30

Enregistrement

Susan
Mburu/Chukwuemeka/Représ
entant de CNC

9:30 – 9:45

Récapitulatif et revue de la première journée

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

9:45 -10:30

Introduction au processus de co-développement

Alfred Nyambane/Dr. Cynthia
Nwobodo10:30 – 11:00

Pause-café
Session 2: Atelier de co-développement

11:00 – 11:40

Atelier 1: Conception des programmes de formation sur

Tous les participants

mesure.
11:40 – 12:20

Atelier 2: Identification des besoins en assistanceTous les participants

technique
12:20 – 1:00

Discussions inter-groupes et partage d'idées

1.00 – 2.00

Tous les participants

Pause déjeuner
Session de l’après-midi: Planification de la mise en œuvre

2:00 -2:30

Présentation du programme codéveloppé

Représentant du conseil

2:30 – 3:30

Retour d'information et affinement à travers un processus

Tous les participantsitératif.

12

3:30 – 4:15

Feuille de route pour la mise en œuvre : Calendrier et

Dr. Cynthia Nwobodo

responsabilités
4:15 – 4:30

Discours de clôture et perspectives

Dr.Chukwuemeka/ Dr Cynthia
Nwobodo13

List of Participants
S/N

NAME

INSTITUTION

EMAIL

1. Dr Babou André BATIONOFONRIDbabou.bationo@gmail.com

76604258

2. Dr Djibril YONLIFONRIDd.yonli313@gmail.com

70729066

3. Pr Salimata KOUAME

FONRID

trasally@yahoo.fr

62132248

4. Ardiouma COULIBALYFONRID

Ardic3192@yahoo.fr

73517134

5. Robert GANSONREFONRID

monsieurgansonre@gmail.co 70459963
m

6. AichaOUEDRAOGO/DIALLOFONRIDaichanassoum@gmail.com

70959536

7. Hervé Dieudonné PALE

FONRID

herve.pale@fonrid.com

70479172

8. Aminata KABORE

INERA

kab.amina@yahoo.fr

70385699

9. Dr Nafissatou
OUEDRAOGOTELEPHONE(+226)

Directrice FRSIT nafissatouedraogo@yahoo.fr 78903263

1 Dr Severin Aimé KIMA0.

DG ANVAR

aimeseverinkima@yahoo.fr

1 Pr Maiga
1.

DG CIOSPB

eugeniemaiga@gmail.com

1 Dr Florencia Wendkuuni
2. ZERBO/DJIGMAMESRI/DGRI

florencia.djigma@gmail.com

1 Pr Aly SAWADOGO3.

MESRI/DGESup alysavadogo@gmail.com
doumouniali@yahoo.fr

70294857

77975459

1 Pr Ali DOUMOUNIA
4.

ENS

78 09 27 84

1 Dr NANEMA Emmanuel5.

DG CNRST

Nanema_emmanuel@yahoo. 60 82 44 02
fr

1 Pr SANOU Adama
6.

VP/RC UJKZSanoua14@yahoo.fr

1 Pr SONGNAABA
7.

VP/RC UTS

70415717
70 10 90 61

14

1 Dr SOME ARCENS MARIE
8. THERESEEx DG FONER

mtarcens@gmail.com

76 59 93 39

1 Dr Eric SAVADOGO
9.

NAFASO-Privé

2 M. SORE
0.

ONG Procashew

70 11 6837

2 M. ZALLE
1.

Secteur privé
APROMAB

76111141

2 M. CISSE
2.

Secteur privé
RPBHC

66 44 66 37

2 M Boureima SAGNAN
3.

MEDIA/Sidwaya

70612673

2 Dr SEREME Idrissa
4.

Directeur INERA drissa.sereme@ird.fr /sereme@gmail.com

70326864

2 Dr BELEMNABA Lazare5.

Directeur IRSS

2
6.

Directrice INSS

2 Dr PARKOUDA Charles
7.

Directeur IRSAT cparkouda@yahoo.fr

70308930

2 Tindano Gerome
8.

MEDIA/TNB

70664950-

lbelemnaba2@gmail.com

2 Pr SOUGOTI/GUISSOU
9. Marie Laure

VP/UNZ

guissoulaure@gmail.com

70278118

3 Sanfo Ibrahim
0.

CIAB

abrafo27@yahoo.fr

76533646

Président/CST

compaore@yahoo.fr

70260693

Maxime COMPAORE

15