Resolution 1815 (2011)1
The potential dangers of electromagnetic fields and their effect on the environment

1. The Parliamentary Assembly has repeatedly stressed the importance of states’ commitment topreserving the environment and environmental health, as set out in many charters, conventions,declarations and protocols since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and theStockholm Declaration (Stockholm, 1972). The Assembly refers to its past work in this field, namelyRecommendation 1863 (2009) on environment and health: better prevention of environmentrelated health hazards, Recommendation 1947 (2010) on noise and light pollution, and moregenerally, Recommendation 1885 (2009) on drafting an additional protocol to the European
Convention on Human Rights concerning the right to a healthy environment and Recommendation
1430 (1999) on access to information, public participation in environmental decision-making andaccess to justice – implementation of the Ǻrhus Convention.
2. The potential health effects of the very low frequency of electromagnetic fields surrounding powerlines and electrical devices are the subject of ongoing research and a significant amount of publicdebate. According to the World Health Organization, electromagnetic fields of all frequencies
represent one of the most common and fastest growing environmental influences, about whichanxiety and speculation are spreading. All populations are now exposed in varying degrees toelectromagnetic fields, the levels of which will continue to increase as technology advances.
3. Mobile telephony has become commonplace around the world. This wireless technology relies
upon an extensive network of fixed antennae, or base stations, relaying information with radiofrequency signals. Over 1.4 million base stations exist worldwide and the number is increasing
significantly with the introduction of third generation technology. Other wireless networks that allow
high-speed Internet access and services, such as wireless local area networks, are also increasingly
common in homes, offices and many public areas (airports, schools, residential and urban areas).
As the number of base stations and local wireless networks increases, so does the radio-frequency
exposure of the population.
4. While electrical and electromagnetic fields in certain frequency bands have wholly beneficial
effects which are applied in medicine, other non-ionising frequencies, whether from extremely lowfrequencies, power lines or certain high frequency waves used in the fields of radar,telecommunications and mobile telephony, appear to have more or less potentially harmful, nonthermal, biological effects on plants, insects and animals as well as the human body, even when
exposed to levels that are below the official threshold values.
5. As regards standards or threshold values for emissions of electromagnetic fields of all types andfrequencies, the Assembly strongly recommends that the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable)
principle is applied, covering both the so-called thermal effects and the athermic or biological effects
of electromagnetic emissions or radiation. Moreover, the precautionary principle should be applied
when scientific evaluation does not allow the risk to be determined with sufficient certainty. Given
the context of growing exposure of the population, in particular that of vulnerable groups such as1

young people and children, there could be extremely high human and economic costs if early
warnings are neglected.
6. The Assembly regrets that, despite calls for the respect of the precautionary principle and despite
all the recommendations, declarations and a number of statutory and legislative advances, there is
still a lack of reaction to known or emerging environmental and health risks and virtually systematicdelays in adopting and implementing effective preventive measures. Waiting for high levels ofscientific and clinical proof before taking action to prevent well-known risks can lead to very highhealth and economic costs, as was the case with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.
7. Moreover, the Assembly notes that the problem of electromagnetic fields or waves and theirpotential consequences for the environment and health has clear parallels with other current issues,
such as the licensing of medication, chemicals, pesticides, heavy metals or genetically modified
organisms. It therefore highlights that the issue of independence and credibility of scientificexpertise is crucial to accomplish a transparent and balanced assessment of potential negative
impacts on the environment and human health.
8. In light of the above considerations, the Assembly recommends that the member states of theCouncil of Europe:
8.1. in general terms:
8.1.1. take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields, especially to radio
frequencies from mobile phones, and particularly the exposure to children and young people whoseem to be most at risk from head tumours;
8.1.2. reconsider the scientific basis for the present standards on exposure to electromagnetic fields
set by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, which have serious
limitations, and apply ALARA principles, covering both thermal effects and the athermic or biologicaleffects of electromagnetic emissions or radiation;
8.1.3. put in place information and awareness-raising campaigns on the risks of potentially harmful
long-term biological effects on the environment and on human health, especially targeting children,teenagers and young people of reproductive age;
8.1.4. pay particular attention to “electrosensitive” people who suffer from a syndrome of
intolerance to electromagnetic fields and introduce special measures to protect them, including thecreation of wave-free areas not covered by the wireless network;
8.1.5. in order to reduce costs, save energy, and protect the environment and human health, stepup research on new types of antenna, mobile phone and DECT-type device, and encourage research
to develop telecommunication based on other technologies which are just as efficient but whoseeffects are less negative on the environment and health;8.2. concerning the private use of mobile phones, DECT wireless phones, WiFi, WLAN and WIMAX
for computers and other wireless devices such as baby monitors:
8.2.1. set preventive thresholds for levels of long-term exposure to microwaves in all indoor areas,in accordance with the precautionary principle, not exceeding 0.6 volts per metre, and in themedium term to reduce it to 0.2 volts per metre;
8.2.2. undertake appropriate risk-assessment procedures for all new types of device prior tolicensing;
8.2.3. introduce clear labelling indicating the presence of microwaves or electromagnetic fields, thetransmitting power or the specific absorption rate (SAR) of the device and any health risks
connected with its use;2

8.2.4. raise awareness on potential health risks of DECT wireless telephones, baby monitors andother domestic appliances which emit continuous pulse waves, if all electrical equipment is left
permanently on standby, and recommend the use of wired, fixed telephones at home or, failingthat, models which do not permanently emit pulse waves;
8.3. concerning the protection of children:
8.3.1. develop within different ministries (education, environment and health) targeted information
campaigns aimed at teachers, parents and children to alert them to the specific risks of early, illconsidered and prolonged use of mobiles and other devices emitting microwaves;
8.3.2. for children in general, and particularly in schools and classrooms, give preference to wired
Internet connections, and strictly regulate the use of mobile phones by schoolchildren on school
premises;
8.4. concerning the planning of electric power lines and relay antenna base stations:
8.4.1. introduce town planning measures to keep high-voltage power lines and other electric
installations at a safe distance from dwellings;
8.4.2. apply strict safety standards for the health impact of electrical systems in new dwellings;
8.4.3. reduce threshold values for relay antennae in accordance with the ALARA principle and installsystems for comprehensive and continuous monitoring of all antennae;
8.4.4. determine the sites of any new GSM, UMTS, WiFi or WIMAX antennae not solely according tothe operators’ interests but in consultation with local and regional government authorities, local
residents and associations of concerned citizens;8.5. concerning risk assessment and precautions:8.5.1. make risk assessment more prevention oriented;
8.5.2. improve risk-assessment standards and quality by creating a standard risk scale, making theindication of the risk level mandatory, commissioning several risk hypotheses to be studied andconsidering compatibility with real-life conditions;
8.5.3. pay heed to and protect “early warning” scientists;
8.5.4. formulate a human-rights-oriented definition of the precautionary and ALARA principles;
8.5.5. increase public funding of independent research, in particular through grants from industry
and taxation of products that are the subject of public research studies to evaluate health risks;
8.5.6. create independent commissions for the allocation of public funds;
8.5.7. make the transparency of lobby groups mandatory;
8.5.8. promote pluralist and contradictory debates between all stakeholders, including civil society(Ǻrhus Convention).

3

1. Text adopted by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the Assembly, on 27 May 2011 (seeDoc. 12608, report of the Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional
Affairs, rapporteur: Mr Huss).

4