Annals of Botany 85: 345±350, 2000
doi:10.1006/anbo.1999.1051, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on

Rapid Swelling of Pollen Grains in the Dehiscing Anther of Two-rowed Barley(Hordeum distichum L. emend. LAM.)
T. M AT S U I * {, K . O M A SA { and T. H O R IE }{Experimental Farm, Kyoto University, 12-1 Hatchonawate, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-0096, Japan, {Graduate School of
Agriculture and Life Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan and } Graduate School of Agriculture,
Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Received: 30 August 1999 Returned for revision: 21 October 1999 Accepted: 8 November 1999
The role of rapid swelling of pollen grains in anther dehiscence in Hordeum distichum L. emend. LAM. and themechanism of this swelling were examined. Arti®cial opening of the ¯oret induced rapid swelling of pollen grains andthecae dehiscence. The theca dehisced as pollen grains became swollen and dehisced anthers had larger pollen grains
than indehisced anthers. Septa in the anther segments dehisced as a result of water-induced pollen pressure. These
results strongly support the theory that the rapid swelling of pollen grains is a driving force for anther dehiscence. On
the other hand, potassium was detected in pollen grains from dehisced anthers, but not in pollen grains in indehisced
anthers. This suggests that potassium ions function as a turgor regulator in the rapid swelling of pollen grains. The
mechanism of anther dehiscence is discussed in relation to the swelling of pollen grains, as is the possible mechanism# 2000 Annals of Botany Companyof this swelling.
Key words: Anther dehiscence, Hordeum distichum L. emend. LAM., pollen swelling, potassium ion, two-rowedbarley.

I N T RO D U C T I O N
Historically, anther dehiscence has generally been regarded
as a desiccatory process (Schmid, 1976). However, someworkers have challenged this assumption (Cheng et al.,
1979; Keijzer, 1987; Bonner and Dickinson, 1990). Using
Liliaceae, Keijzer (1987) reported that the dehiscing processof the anther consists of the following four stages: (1)enzymatic rupture of the septum between two locules; (2)mechanical rupture of the tapetum that kept the locules
close together by swelling of pollen grains; (3) mechanicalopening of the stomium by the centripetal force of thehighly turgescent epidermis and endothecium using theepidermal cells of locule walls adjacent to the stomium as afulcrum; and (4) outward bending of the locule walls by thecentrifugal force of the dehydrating epidermis and endothecium.
Previously, Matsui et al. (1999a,b) showed that ¯oret
opening in rice (Oryza sativa L.) induces rapid swelling ofpollen grains, which causes the theca to bulge, disrupting
the septum and resulting in theca dehiscence. The nextquestion is whether this mechanism evolved to eect antherdehiscence in rice, a species that pollinates even in a wet or
rainy monsoon season. This paper reports the mechanismof anther dehiscence, based on pollen grain swelling, in
two-rowed barley (Hordeum distichum L. emend. LAM.), a
cleistogamous poaceous plant, and shows that such amechanism is not peculiar to rice. In addition, we discuss
the possible involvement of potassium ions in the rapid
swelling of pollen grains.
* For correspondence. Fax 81 726 83 1532.

0305-7364/00/030345+06 $35.00/00

M AT E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S
Plant materials
Hordeum distichum L. emend. LAM. (`Saikaikawa 24',
cleistogamous two-rowed barley) grown under ®eld conditions (Experimental Farm of Kyoto University, Osaka,
Japan) from November to May was used for all experiments. Heading was from the end of March to mid-April.
Transverse sections of anthers
Florets with lemmas removed were ®xed in FAA
immediately after emergence. The ®xed materials were
dehydrated with a methanol±butanol series, and embedded
in paran. Ten-micron-thick transverse sections were cut
and stained with toluidine blue-O.
Process of anther dehiscence
Florets were detached from panicles at the heading stage
before pollination, and the lemmas were removed immediately (arti®cial ¯oret opening) at 208C, and 60% relative
humidity (R.H.). Within a few minutes, anthers in some¯orets dehisced. The process of anther dehiscence wasobserved under a stereo-microscope.
Diameter of pollen grains and anther dehiscence
Several days after emergence of the panicles, ¯orets on
one side of the panicles (Fig. 1A±L) were detached and theirlemmas were immediately removed at 208C, and 60% R.H.
# 2000 Annals of Botany Company

346

Matsui et al.ÐRapid Swelling of Barley Pollen in Dehiscing Anthers
thicker in the upper part of the locule, especially adjacent tothe stomium, than in other parts.
Process of anther dehiscence

FIG. 1. The notation of ¯oret position on a panicle.

After 4 min, the percentage of dehisced thecae was
examined. The anthers were then broken open using
tweezers and the diameters of scattered pollen grains wereimmediately measured under a stereo-microscope. Eighteenpollen grains from three anthers per ¯oret were examined.
Florets on the other side of the panicles (a±k in Fig. 1)
were also detached and their lemmas were immediately
removed. In this group, anthers in one ¯oret were broken
every 2 min after checking whether they had dehisced, andthe diameters of six pollen grains per anther were measured.

After arti®cial ¯oret opening, anthers began to dehisce
within a few minutes. The ®rst detectable change relating toanther dehiscence was the rapid expansion of the whole
theca, which implies rupture of the septum (Fig. 3A, B). As
a result of this expansion, the stomium bulged outwards
and became ¯at except at the apical part of the theca; here,
the locule walls adjacent to the stomium remained bent
inward (Fig. 3B). Subsequently, the stomium split at theapical end of the thecae (Fig. 3C). After a few minutes, thelocule walls adjacent to the split straightened (Fig. 3D),
causing the split on the stomium to widen and the pollen
grains to over¯ow from the widened split.
Diameter of pollen grains and anther dehiscence

Anthers that did not dehisce by arti®cial ¯oret opening
were detached from a panicle several days after emergence.
Both ends of each anther were excised leaving the middle
part (about 0.3 mm) in a 10% sucrose solution. The cut
piece was again transversely cut in half, each with four
locule tubes (about 0.15 mm in length). Pollen grains in one
half were carefully brushed out of the locule tubes and left
in the sucrose solution. Pollen grains were left intact in theother half of the anther. After this treatment, both anthersegments were immersed in water. Thirty minutes later,
septum rupture was observed. Five to ten minutes wererequired for anther cutting and pollen removal. This
experiment was repeated ten times.

Figure 1 shows the notation of ¯oret position on apanicle, and Fig. 4 the relationship between the position of¯orets on the panicle and the diameter of the pollen grainsin the ¯oret 4 min after arti®cial ¯oret opening, together
with the dehiscence of thecae at that time. Anthers in¯owers on the apical and basal parts of the panicle did notdehisce. Pollen grain diameters in the dehisced anthers wereover 45 mm, whereas those in the indehisced anthers were
smaller. The stomium of indehisced thecae had not risen,which means that the septum of such thecae remained
unruptured.
Figure 5 shows the time course of changes in the
diameters of pollen grains and the thecae dehiscence afterarti®cial ¯oret opening. The diameter of pollen grains in the¯orets on the middle part of the panicle increased within
2 min, whereas those in the ¯orets near the apical and basal
ends of the panicle did not. Only anthers with large pollen
grains dehisced.

Detection of potassium ions in pollen grains

Rupture of septum in water and potassium in pollen grains

Florets were detached from panicles several days after
their emergence, and the lemmas of the ¯orets were
removed at 208C and 60% R.H. After 2 min, pollen grains
were sampled from dehisced and indehisced anthers. Bothpollen grains were stained with Macallum's modi®ed
solution (Toriyama, 1955) and embedded in glycerin.

In anther segments with locules holding pollen grains,
80% of the septa between locule tubes ruptured in water,
but no septa ruptured in the anther segments holding nopollen grains.
Figure 6 shows the potassium salt crystals in pollen
grains formed in Macallum's modi®ed solution. The pollen
grains from dehisced thecae had crystals (Fig. 6A), whereas
those from indehisced thecae had few crystals (Fig. 6B).

Role of pollen grain swelling

R E S U LT S
Anther structure
The anther of two-rowed barley consists of two thecae,bound together by connective tissue (Fig. 2A, B). Eachtheca is separated by small epidermal cells (stomium) and aseptum. In the centre of the septum the cavity fordehiscence is formed, while some of the septum cells still
persist; the septum cells and the deteriorated tapetum
appear to keep the locules close together (Fig. 2C). The
U-shaped cell-wall thickening in the endothecium became

DISCUSSION
Pollen grains in ¯orets in the middle part of the panicle
showed rapid swelling in response to arti®cial ¯oret
opening, whereas grains in ¯orets at the apical and basal
ends did not. Florets on a panicle of two-rowed barleycomplete pollination from the middle part of the panicle toeither ends. Thus, the swelling ability of pollen grains
coincides with ¯owering order, which indicates that there isa natural maturation gradient of pollen grains in a panicle

Matsui et al.ÐRapid Swelling of Barley Pollen in Dehiscing Anthers

347

B

A

L
L

L

L

L
L

L

L

C

P

CA
ST

S
FIG. 2. Cross-sections of an anther stained by toluidine blue O. A, Cross-section of apical end. Thickened U-shaped walls are observed in theendothecial cells (arrowheads). B, Cross-section of middle region. C, Details around a septum. S, Septum; ST , stomium; L, locule; CA , cavity foranther dehiscence. Bars  100 mm (A and B) or 25 mm (C).

and that the swelling ability of the pollen grains depends onthe maturation stage of the pollen grains.
Dehisced anthers had larger pollen grains than indehisced anthers, and the anthers dehisced as the pollen grains
became swollen. Transverse sections of the anther before
dehiscence show that some of the cells in the septum still
persist and keep the two adjacent locules closed together
with the deteriorated tapetum. Dehiscence, therefore,
includes rupture of the septum and splitting of thestomium, and the close relationship between the swellingof pollen grains and anther dehiscence suggests thatswelling of pollen grains is important in these two events.
Since the last century the mechanism of septum rupture
has been the subject of debate (Keijzer, 1987). The

mechanisms presented by earlier investigators can be
categorized into mechanical rupture and enzymatic breakdown of the tissue. According to the mechanical rupture
theory, outward bending of locule walls by desiccation andpollen pressure were the driving forces.
Keijzer (1987) showed that desiccation of the endothecium did not cause opening of the septum in Liliaceae.
Matsui et al. (1999b) also showed disturbance of septum
rupture by desiccation in the anther of rice. Moreover,Cheng et al. (1979) showed that maize septum rupture does
not involve endothecial ®brose wall thickening. In thepresent observation, ¯oret opening caused rupture of the
septum only in the ¯orets in the middle of the panicle. Thisobservation suggests that septum rupture is not a simple

348

Matsui et al.ÐRapid Swelling of Barley Pollen in Dehiscing Anthers

FIG. 3. The process of anther dehiscence. A, The beginning of the anther dehiscence process; the stomium is rising. B, Just after the rising ofstomium. C, The beginning of stomium opening. Locule wall keeps the slit at the opening stomium. D, Locule wall adjacent to the stomium begins
to bend outward. The slit on the stomium begins to widen.

FIG. 4. Relationships between the position of the ¯oret on the panicle
and the diameter of pollen grains, and the percentage of dehisced
thecae in the anthers 2 min after arti®cial ¯oret opening. d, All thecae
dehisced; m, half of the thecae dehisced; j, no thecae dehisced.
Vertical bars indicate +s.e. of three anthers.

FIG. 5. Typical change in the diameter of pollen grains afterarti®cial ¯oret opening. Letters indicate the position of the ¯oret on
the panicle (see Fig. 1). Open and solid symbols indicate dehisced andindehisced anthers, respectively. Vertical bars indicate +s.e. of six
pollen grains.

Matsui et al.ÐRapid Swelling of Barley Pollen in Dehiscing Anthers

349

FIG. 6. Pollen grains from dehisced (A) and indehisced anthers (B). Both materials were treated with Macallum's modi®ed solution and embedded
in glycerin. Arrowheads indicate the crystals of potassium salts (yellow crystals). Bars  100 mm.

desiccatory process because the U-shaped thickening of thecell wall in the endothecium, which generates an outwardand inward-bending force of locule walls with the osmotic
properties of the endothecium, is already completed at the
panicle emergence. This is in agreement with the above
reports.
Keijzer (1987) showed that the septum in Gasteria
verrucosa opened normally after removal of the pollen
from the locules. The septum in male sterile anthers lacking
expanding pollen in Aloe vera was also found to open
(Keijzer and Cresti, 1987). From these results andcytological changes in the anther of G. verrucosa, Keijzer(1987) concluded that enzymatic breakdown of cell wallmaterial leads to the opening of the septum. In maize,
Keijzer et al. (1996) found enzymatic lysis of the septum
preceded theca dehiscence. Cheng et al. (1979, 1986)
assumed that the shortening of the outer epidermal wallfrom the microspore stage to the time of anther dehiscencegenerates the tensile force responsible for the rupture of the
septum. The enzymatic lysis and the tensile force, however,cannot explain the synchronism between ¯oret opening andseptum rupture. Our arti®cial water-induced rupture of the
septum proves that pollen pressure can rupture the septumand cause the theca to bulge in two-rowed barley. In thisexperiment, septa that had not dehisced as a result ofarti®cial ¯oret opening, probably because of immaturity ofthe pollen, dehisced in water. This indicates that rupture
does not depend on a change in physical character of thetissue but on the ability of pollen grains to swell. Pollenpressure would complete the rupture of the septum
weakened by enzymes.
In our observations on the anther dehiscence process, thestomium bulged outward in the whole theca simultaneously
after arti®cial opening of the ¯oret. The stomium, however,ruptured only at the apical part of theca. This indicates thatthe swelling of pollen grains alone cannot split the stomium,although there is a close relationship between the diameterof pollen grains and thecae dehiscence. Since the locule walls
adjacent to the splitting stomium remained bent inward, it is
supposed that bulging of the theca as a result of pollenpressure, combined with the centripetal force of the locule
walls adjacent to the stomium on the apical part of thecae,
stretches the stomium more severely than in other parts andsplits it. In transverse sections of the anther, the locule walls
adjacent to the splitting stomium had well-developed cellwall thickening. Since such locule walls bend outward bydesiccation and inward due to water uptake by the endothecium and epidermis (Keijzer, 1987), the locule walls
would remain bent by the turgor in the latter two tissues.
Previously, Matsui et al. (1999b) reported a similar role oflocule walls in the splitting of the stomium on the apical partof the rice anther. They compared anther dehiscence underdierent relative humidities, and found that desiccation was
not necessary for stomium splitting. Keijzer (1987) reported
that epidermal cells of the locule walls adjacent to thestomium act as a fulcrum in G. verrucosa. Such a role of the350

Matsui et al.ÐRapid Swelling of Barley Pollen in Dehiscing Anthers

epidermis was not con®rmed in our observation; the locule
walls adjacent to the splitting septum did not touch eachother. On the other hand, Keijzer et al. (1996) found cellwall lysis in the stomium of the apical part of the antherpreceded dehiscence in maize.
Swelling is caused by imbibition by the pollen grains. It is
generally accepted that active water movement in plants
depends on the gradient of water potential that is mainly
regulated by saccharide or cation (especially potassium ion)content. In Poaceous pollen grains, accumulated starch in
the grains breaks down just before pollination (Watanabe,
1961; Koike and Satake, 1987). The dissolution of starch
into saccharides will decrease the osmotic potential in pollen
grains. The observed pollen grain swelling, however,occurred within 2 min. Since starch breakdown is a relatively
slow process (a few hours is needed for rice pollen tocomplete breakdown; Koike and Satake, 1987), it is dicult
to explain the swelling by a change in saccharide concentration alone. In contrast, movement of potassium ions as
osmotic regulators is rapid: various rapid actions have beenshown to be caused by the movement of potassium ions inplants (e.g. pulvinus in Mimosa pudica; Toriyama, 1955).
Potassium was detected in pollen grains from dehisced
anthers, but not in pollen grains in indehisced anthers,
which suggests the participation of potassium ions in theswelling of pollen grains. There is good evidence that theplasma membrane of pollen grains has K  channels(Obermeyer and Kolb, 1993) and a proton pump (Weisenseel and Jae, 1976; Obermeyer et al., 1992). Moreover,
Obermeyer and Blatt (1995) showed that K  in¯ux and H eux are present in quiescent, ungerminated pollen grains
in Lilium longi¯orum. Although such K  in¯ux is regarded
as a process which initiates pollen grain germination(Weisenseel, Nuccitelli and Jae, 1975; Obermeyer andBlatt, 1995), it seems to be required for active water uptake
by pollen grains. We hypothesize that the inward current ofpotassium ions from the inter-pollen space (locular ¯uid)
into pollen grains decreases the water potential in pollen
grains and leads to their swelling.
The mechanism of anther dehiscence after arti®cial ¯oret
opening may be summarized as follows: (1) ¯oret opening
triggers rapid swelling of pollen grains, which may becaused by K  accumulation; (2) the swelling causes thetheca to bulge and the whole septum to rupture; (3) at theapical end of the theca, the pressure of the swollen pollen
combined with the centripetal force of the locule walls
adjacent to the stomium splits the stomium.
A similar mechanism, from the rapid swelling of pollen
grains to stomium split, has been observed in the apical partof rice thecae (Matsui et al., 1999a,b). Such mechanisms
may be common in Poaceous plants. However, the tworowed barley used in this study is cleistogamous, andnormally the anthers dehisce without ¯oret opening. It issomewhat surprising, therefore, that arti®cial ¯oret opening
triggered anther dehiscence as seen in chasmogamous rice.
How anther dehiscence is triggered will be the subject of
future research.
AC K N OW L E DG M E N T S
We thank Mr M. Mineyama and Mr R. Wada for technicalassistance.
L I T E R AT U R E C I T E D
Bonner LJ, Dickinson HG. 1990. Anther dehiscence in Lycopersiconesculentum. II. Water relations. New Phytologist 115: 367±375.
Cheng PC, Greyson RI, Walden DB. 1979. Comparison of antherdevelopment in genic male-sterile (ms10) and in male-fertile corn
(Zea mays) from light microscopy and scanning electron
microscopy. Canadian Journal of Botany 57: 578±596.
Cheng PC, Greyson RI, Walden DB. 1986. The anther cuticle of Zea
mays. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 2088±2097.
Keijzer CJ. 1987. The process of anther dehiscence and pollen
dispersal. I. The opening mechanism of longitudinally dehiscing
anthers. New Phytologist 105: 487±498.
Keijzer CJ, Cresti M. 1987. A comparison of anther tissue development
in male sterile Aloe vera and male fertile Aloe ciliaris. Annals of
Botany 59: 533±542.
Keijzer CJ, Leferink-ten Klooster HB, Reinders MC. 1996. The
mechanics of the grass ¯ower: anther dehiscence and pollen
shedding in maize. Annals of Botany 78: 15±21.
Koike S, Satake T. 1987. Sterility caused by cooling treatment at the¯owering stage in rice plants. II. The abnormal digestion of starchin pollen grain and metabolic changes in anthers following coolingtreatment. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 56: 666±672.
Matsui T, Omasa K, Horie T. 1999a. Rapid swelling of pollen grains in
response to ¯oret opening unfolds locule in rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Plant Production Science 2: 196±199.
Matsui T, Omasa K, Horie T. 1999b. Mechanism of anther dehiscencein rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 84: 501±506.
Obermeyer G, Blatt MR. 1995. Electrical properties of intact pollen
grains of Lilium longi¯orum: characteristics of the non-germinating pollen grain. Journal of Experimental Botany 46: 803±813.
Obermeyer G, Kolb HA. 1993. K  channel in the plasma membrane oflily pollen protoplasts. Botanica Acta 106: 26±31.
Obermeyer G, Lutzelschwab M, Heumann H-G, Weisenseel MH. 1992.
Immunolocalization of H  -ATPases in the plasma membrane ofpollen grains and pollen tubes of Lilium longi¯orum. Protoplasma
117: 55±63.
Schmid R. 1976. Filament histology and anther dehiscence. Botanical
Journal of the Linnean Society 73: 303±315.
Toriyama H. 1955. Observational and experimental studies of sensitiveplants. VI. The migration of potassium in the primary pulvinus.
Cytologia 20: 367±377.
Watanabe K. 1961. Studies on the germination of glass pollen. II.
Germination capacity of pollen in relation to the maturity ofpollen and stigma. Botanical Magazine Tokyo 74: 131±137.
Weisenseel MH, Jae LF. 1976. The major growth current through lilypollen tubes enters as K  and leaves as H  . Planta 133: 1±7.
Weisenseel MH, Nuccitelli R, Jae LH. 1975. Large electricalcurrents traverse growing pollen tubes. Journal of Cell Biology
66: 556±567.