Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
第41回原子力委員会
資料第3-1号

White Paper on Nuclear Energy 2016
– Summary –1． Background○ The White Paper on Nuclear Energy has been published on a continuous basis since thelaunch of the Japan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC) in 1956 through 2010, the year
before the TEPCO Fukushima nuclear power plant accident (the Fukushima accident).
○ Subsequent to the 2009 edition (published in March 2010), the White Paper wassuspended, as attention was focused on responses to the Fukushima accident andsubsequent review and reform of the JAEC.
○ The report of the Experts Committee for Review of the JAEC suggested that there wasvalue in publishing the White Paper, and the Amended Act for Establishment of JAEC
clearly called for the task of "the collection of information and conducting of surveys
concerning nuclear utilization."
2． Objectives○ The White Paper on Nuclear Energy is intended to fulfill the responsibility of the Japanese
Government to the Japanese people to comprehensively and continuously provide
explanation on the Government's initiatives in nuclear energy based on the lessons
learned from the Fukushima accident and the changes in attitudes surrounding nuclear
energy. Additionally, with attention focused from overseas on the state of nuclear energy
in Japan, the White Paper is a suitable means of sharing information with theinternational community.
○ At this time, JAEC has adopted the "Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy". The Cabinet has
decided that the Government will respect this document for research, development andutilization of nuclear science and technology.

It is important to present readily

understandable information to the Japanese people, including the statement of "Basic
Policy for Nuclear Energy".
3． Main Points of the White Paper(1) "Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy"
JAEC adopted “Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy” and the Cabinet decided that the1

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
Government will respect this document in July 2017. The White Paper provides
explanation of the policy using data on the circumstances surrounding nuclear energy andinternational expertise.
(2) The experience and lessons-learned from the Fukushima accident and the efforts
implemented based on themSome organizations such as NAIIC (The Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation
Commission) established by the National Diet of Japan after the Fukushima Nuclear
Accident and the Governmental Investigation Committee conducted investigations
concerning the Fukushima accident. The White Paper describes the reform of nuclear
safety organization and systems as well as the ongoing efforts implemented based on the
proposal of those organizations. The White Paper also describes tireless efforts toimprove safety that have been made by nuclear industry, including nuclear operators.
It describes the progress of recovery and reconstruction at Fukushima, and the effort
made to tackle decommissioning of damaged reactors and develop counter measures tocontaminated water.
(3) Fixed point observations of current status and measures implemented in the
research, development, and utilization of nuclear energy in Japan
The White Paper comprehensively reports on the current activities and continuous efforts
in entire areas of nuclear energy in Japan, which includes: ensuring peaceful uses;
implementation of nuclear safety measures; rebuilding public trust; processing anddisposal of radioactive wastes; developing and securing human resources; research anddevelopment; utilization of radiation; nuclear security; and international approaches.

2

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Introduction】Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy○"Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy" was adopted on July 20, 2017 by JAEC, and is the firstfull-scale policy recommendation of the Commission after its renewal. The Cabinet
decided that the Government will respect this document for research, development andutilization of nuclear science and technology on the next day, July 21.
○ The White Paper presents the entire text of the document along with its accompanying
diagrams.
1．Changing environment surrounding nuclear energy• A need exists to sincerely address the public distrust and anxiety about nuclear energy and rebuild
social confidence• A new competitive electric power market has emerged with full liberalization of the retailelectricity market• Further substantial reduction of greenhouse gas emissions over a long term will be difficult toachieve simply by applying existing countermeasures• Increased use of existing thermal power stations and introduction of a feed-in tariff (FIT) system
for renewable energy have led to higher electricity tariffs, which have had a major negative
impacts on people’s livelihood and economic activities
2．Fundamental issues ingrained in in nuclear energy-related organizations• The unique mindset and groupthink in Japan, the pressure to conform tacitly or forcibly to theopinion of the majority, and the tendency to maintain the status quo are all very strong, and they
can be a problem.
• Another tendency within organizations is to lapse into sub-optimization. Creating a culture inwhich people can exchange a variety of opinions based on solid grounds, regardless of theirstanding inside or outside the organization, is necessary
3． Basic objectives and important initiatives of nuclear energy use• Appropriate use of nuclear energy with thorough risk-management by responsible organizations isnecessary.
• It is important to proceed with the use of nuclear energy with peaceful use and safety assurance
as basic preconditions, winning the confidence of the people and bearing in mind both benefits andcosts that nuclear technology can bring to the environment, people’s livelihood, and economic
activities.
(1) Seriously reflect on the Fukushima accident and learn lessons therefrom•

Establish a safety culture that overcomes weakness of traditional Japanese organizations
and national cultures.

•

Shift in safety assurance of a “culture of prevention” by promotion of risk management.

3

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017(2) Pursue nuclear energy use addressing global warming issues and people’s livelihood and theeconomy•The National Government needs to clarify the role that nuclear power generation can playover a long term and examine necessary measures therefor.

(3) Nuclear energy in the global context•

Collect and share international knowledge and experiences; improve internationalawareness(4) Peaceful use of nuclear energy: enhancing non-proliferation and security regimes•

Take steps to assure the international community of Japan’s peaceful use of plutonium t;
Ensure the plutonium balance and responsible plutonium management; consume plutonium
by pluthermal(5) Rebuilding public trust, as a major precondition•

Create an information base for people to be able to deepen their understanding of
the circumstances surrounding nuclear energy use in Japan based on scientificallyaccurate information and objective facts(evidence)(6) Steadily pursuing decommissioning and radioactive waste disposal•

The resolute implementation of disposal of radioactive waste by the current
responsible generation(7) Expanded use of radiation and radioisotopes•

Develop necessary infrastructure to enable further use of radiation and radioisotopes
including the use of quantum beams.

(8) Solid foundation for nuclear energy use•

R&D institutions and nuclear industry should collaborate and develop a deep and broad
knowledge base.

⇒In light of the fact that the environment surrounding nuclear energy will keep changing
substantially in the coming years, “Basic Policy for Nuclear Energy” is to be reviewed andrevised, as necessary, roughly every five years.

4

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Chapter 1】 Responding to the Fukushima accident and initiatives
toward reconstruction and revival
1-1 investigations and verification of the Fukushima accident○ In the wake of the Fukushima accident, institutions in Japan and abroad, including the
National Diet of Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation
Commission (NAIIC), the Investigation Committee on the Accident at the Fukushima
Nuclear Power Stations of Tokyo Electric Power Company (ICANPS), and theInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) conducted investigations and verification
activities, and published numerous recommendations.
○ While certain causes behind the accident remain unascertained due to extremely highlevels of radioactivity and the resultant inability to conduct on-site studies, impact of theaccident on society continues. Therefore, ongoing initiatives are needed to clarify causesof the accident and the extent of the damage.
1-2 Initiatives and structural reform in nuclear safety after the Fukushima accident○ The Government has strengthened nuclear safety regulations and measures for nuclear
emergency response based on the recommendations of the NAIIC and ICANPS.
○ The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) has unified nuclear safety management andplaced the safety of the people in the use of nuclear energy as its the highest priority. In
particular, the NRA has newly developed the world's most stringent level of regulatory
regime incorporating strengthened measures to deal with severe accidents and has
conducted conformity reviews.
○ The amended Act on Special Measures concerning Nuclear Emergency Preparedness
has specified that the Government bear the responsibility of developing thoroughmeasures to prevent nuclear disasters, assuming the possibility that such disasters could
be caused by large-scale natural disasters. Amendments to the Atomic Energy Basic Act
have strengthened the system by implementing such measures as the establishment of
Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Council which coordinates overall nuclear disasterprevention.
○With the goal of achieving higher levels of safety, nuclear operators who have primary
responsibility for ensuring safety have made efforts to improve and implement voluntaryand ongoing safety improvement measures such as setting up voluntary regulatoryorganizations, utilization of risk assessment, and enhancement of their response to
severe accidents. The Government is promoting voluntary improvements in nuclear
power safety in the industry, including the development of roadmaps for light-water
reactor safety technologies and for human resources development.

5

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

Post-accident review of nuclear safety governmental systems

1-3 Initiatives toward the reconstruction and revival of the Fukushima area
○ Environmental contamination occurred due to the release of radioactive substancesfrom reactor facilities in the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.

The structure of government on the reconstruction and revival of the Fukushima area
(As of December, 2016), (source) Created by Office of Atomic Energy Policy based on” Initiatives toward the reconstruction revival of the
Fukushima area” Reconstruction Agency

6

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
○ The Government implemented emergency protective measures against radioactivity inthe wake of the accident, including by issuing evacuation orders to residents andrestrictions on the shipment of food products. To assess the effects of radiation on thehuman body and the environment, air dose rate monitoring and studies of the impact
on health were conducted immediately after the accident.
○ Yet even at the end of December 2016, the impact of the accident is ongoing, with many
Fukushima residents remaining evacuated from their homes and some food shipment
restrictions continuing. Therefore, the following measures are proceeding to lift theevacuation order and to restore and reconstruct the disaster area:
・ Decontamination, treatment of radioactive waste material, setting up of interim storage
facility
・ Implementation of initiatives to support the reconstruction of lives through safety andsecurity measures for early return of the evacuees, reconstruction of businesses andlivelihoods, and measures to address rumors
・ Initiatives toward reconstruction and revival such as the Fukushima Innovation Coast
schemeTransition of evacuation area (from April 2011 to April 2017)(source) Created by Office of Atomic Energy Policy based on “a review of evacuation area” (Team in Charge of Assisting the Lives ofVictims of the Fukushima accident) and “image of evacuation area” (METI)

7

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

1-4 Efforts to decommission the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant○ Decommissioning of the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant and dealing withcontaminated water is being implemented safely and steadily following the "Mid-to LongTerm Roadmap for Decommissioning the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power
Plant." The roadmap sets basic guidelines and milestones for implementation of thedecommissioning plan. Since the initial version was released in December 2011, theroadmap has been revised on an ongoing basis to reflect the progress of these initiatives.
○ It will also incorporate a broad range of insight from within Japan and from overseas aswell as further research and development to implement the decommissioning plan overthe medium to long term. As it is important to promote efforts to develop and secure
human resources such as researchers and engineers to maintain and continue thedecommissioning work and to support research and development activities, theGovernment is going forward in setting up projects of research and development to deal
with the highly complex technical issues associated with plant decommissioning as wellas basic research, human resources development, and establishing proper researchfacilities.

8

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Chapter 2】 Basic activities pertaining to the use of nuclear energy
2-1 Nuclear safety measures○ Measures to improve nuclear safety based on lessons learned from the Fukushima
accident have been implemented by IAEA, OECD/NEA, the United States, and othercountries.
○ In Japan, the nuclear safety regulation system was reorganized and nuclear safety
regulations have been strengthened by implementing measures to deal with severe
accidents, and by incorporating the latest knowledge.
○ The Nuclear Regulatory Commission monitors and oversees initiatives to ensure safe
operations by nuclear operators within the framework of new nuclear safety regulations
and implements ongoing improvements in regulations based on the most up-to-dateknowledge.
○ The Nuclear Emergency Preparedness and Response Guidelines call for "continuous
revision to improve effectiveness based on newly obtained knowledge and accurate
assessments of the situation on the ground," and initiatives to enhance nuclear disaster
preparedness is being implemented along with ongoing revision of the Guidelines.

Transition of evacuation area (from April 2011 to April 2017)(source) Office for the Nuclear Emergency Preparedness’s web site “Support for an improvement of a regional disaster prevention plan ”

9Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
2-2 Nuclear Security○ The Government of Japan complies with the mandates of the "Convention on theProtection of Nuclear Materials and Nuclear Facilities", and requires, based on the
Nuclear Reactor Regulation Law, that nuclear operators take appropriate steps to prevent
interference or destruction of nuclear facilities and to prevent the theft of nuclear material
at every stage, including its transport, storage, and use in nuclear facilities. The
Government conducts periodic reviews of the implementation status of protective
measures instituted by the operators.
○ While there have been protective measures against the illegal movement of nuclear
material and interference in or destruction of nuclear facilities or the transport of nuclear
material, these protections are now being expanded to deal with the theft of radioactive
substances and obstruction relating to facilities or transportation, as well as regulating
nuclear materials and other radioactive substances that were outside of regulatory
control.
2-3 Ensuring peaceful use○ The IAEA has established safeguards to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy andhas signed safeguard agreements with countries around the world to prevent thediversion of nuclear material from peaceful uses to military uses.
○ Japan ensures the peaceful use of nuclear energy through strict application of IAEA
safeguards and strengthened transparency in the use of plutonium.
○ In August 2003, the JAEC adopted “the Basic Policy on the Utilization of Plutonium inJapan”. Since then the JAEC has made its own efforts for toward ensuring transparency
of regarding the use of plutonium such as requiring the electric utilities to submit plans forthe use of plutonium.
○ The Japanese Government has been strengthening the governance structure regarding
reprocessing operations of spent nuclear fuel through the Spent Nuclear Fuel
Reprocessing Fund Act, enacted by the Diet in May 2016. This act established the
Nuclear Reprocessing Organization of Japan (NuRO) as an authorized corporation
responsible for implementation of reprocessing. The Act stipulates that the Minister of
Economy, Trade and Industry, in the process of approving the mid-term implementation
plan for spent nuclear fuel reprocessing (MRP) of NuRO, shall ask for the view of the
JAEC from the viewpoint of peaceful use of nuclear energy and securing the supplydemand balance of plutonium. Based on Japan’s policy of “not possessing plutonium
reserves of which use is unspecified” the JAEC will neutrally judge each plan’s
appropriateness in terms of supply-and-demand balance of plutonium and make public its
view, and present its opinion to the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, electricutilities, and others as appropriate.
○ In view of increasing worldwide concerns about Japan’s plutonium stockpile, JAEC

10

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
believes that the steady consumption of plutonium in the form of MOX fuel for light water
reactors is currently the only practical way of using plutonium.
(In September 2017, JAEC published explanation on the use of plutonium in Japan, ”Plutonium
Utilization in Japan”: http://www.aec.go.jp/jicst/NC/about/kettei/kettei171003_e.pdf)

2-4 Treatment and disposal of radioactive waste○ Radioactive waste is generated by the use of nuclear energy and radiation and related
research and development in nuclear power plants, nuclear fuel cycle facilities,
universities, laboratories, and medical institutions, and by the demolition of those nuclear
related facilities. The processing and disposal of these radioactive waste materials
ensuring that these materials have no significant impact on human health or the living
environment is a vital aspect of the use of nuclear energy.
○ The White Paper explains an overview of the final disposal of high-level radioactive waste
and initiatives in the treatment and disposal of low-level radioactive waste.

11

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

2-5 Securing and Training of nuclear energy human resources○ To improve safety from the lessons of the Fukushima accident, it is necessary to secure
human resources with high levels of skill and safety consciousness. A variety oftechnologies will also be needed along with the people who can take charge of thesetechnologies to handle the reprocessing of spent fuel, to treat, dispose of and eliminate
radioactive waste, and to ensure the safe decommissioning of the TEPCO’s Fukushima
Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.
○ After reaching a peak in 1994, the number of students majoring in nuclear energy has
declined, and has trended flat in recent years at around 750. Moreover, in the wake of the
Fukushima accident, there has been an ongoing decrease in the number of engineering
personnel participating in joint briefings by nuclear energy-related companies and newhires among electric power operators.

12

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

2-6 Coexistence of the public and local communities with nuclear energy○ The accident investigation report identified problems in the way the Government andTEPCO provided information to citizens about the situation of the accident and the effectsof radiation on the human body, as well as problems in the content of the information
itself. The report also identified issues in the way information should be presented to the
public in normal times, and not just in times of an emergency, such as an accident.
○ These problems are some of the main factors underlying the general public's distrust andanxiety about nuclear energy. To rebuild public trust, the Government and nuclear
operators have participated in town hall style meetings and fostered open dialogs andexchanges of information with communities where power plants are located as well aswith the communities that consume the electric power those plants generate.
○ JAEC has identified the need to build information systems based on scientificunderstanding (evidence) that enables anyone with nuclear energy-related questions to
independently find explanations and answers to help them develop a deeper
understanding.

13

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

○ In the column, the Japan Atomic Energy Commission introduced some of the initiatives of
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) in the
United States as examples of how to build evidence-based information systems.

14

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Chapter 3】 Utilization of nuclear energy and radiation
3-1 Utilization of nuclear energy(1) Nuclear Power Generation○ The Fukushima accident had an enormous impact on the people of Fukushima Prefecture
and many other Japanese citizens. The accident increased the level of people's distrust
and anxiety about nuclear energy. It is essential to confront this distrust and anxiety
honestly and directly, and rebuild social confidence by making greater efforts to alleviate
people's concerns.
○ The Government's basic policy is that dependency on nuclear power generation will belowered to the extent possible by energy saving and introducing renewable energy as
well as improving the efficiency of thermal power generation, etc.

○ Efforts need to be made to resolve the following issues that Japan faces
・ At 94.4%, Japan’s dependence on overseas resources is one of the highest amongindustrialized nations.
・ Burden on the public has increased in the form of higher electricity rates due to greater
reliance on thermal power generation using imported fossil fuels to replace nuclear
power, as well as the introduction of the feed-in tariff system for renewable energy
・ Efforts must be made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to deal with the problem ofglobal warming

15

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

(2) Nuclear fuel cycle○ Establishment of a "nuclear fuel cycle" is a basic national policy where spent nuclear fuelgenerated by nuclear power plants is reprocessed and recovered plutonium and uranium
are effectively used as fuel,.
○ Keeping in mind that safety always comes first, the Government and nuclear operators
have been making efforts to implement this basic policy with understanding andcooperation of the public including communities surrounding nuclear power plants.

16

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
○ Due to the possibility of the diversion of uranium-enrichment facility and reprocessing
facility for production of high enriched uranium and plutonium which might be used fornuclear weapons, the use of these facilities and materials is strictly limited to peacefulpurposes in accordance with the Atomic Energy Basic Law. Furthermore, transparency
relating to peaceful use should be increased to allay concerns both within Japan andinternationally.

3-2 Utilization of radiation○ Japan has developed technologies for the safe handling of radiation and regulations forradiation protection to prevent damage to human health.
○ Academic and industrial research and development has gone forward to use the benefitsof radiation, and today radiation is effectively used in a wide variety of fields including
medicine, industry, agriculture, and science and technology. The aggregate economic
value of these applications is calculated at nearly 4 trillion yen.

17

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 201718

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Chapter 4】 Nuclear energy research and development○ Japan is promoting research and development related to the decommissioning of the
TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and measures for its contaminated waterand approaches to restoring the contaminated environment, and nuclear safety research.
Additionally, grounded on the lessons learned from the accident, it is necessary toproceed with technology development that contributes to improved safety, including
measures to deal with severe accidents, and with R&D work that contributes to thedisposal of spent fuel and other radioactive waste.
○ From the standpoint of the practical application of new nuclear energy science andtechnology, JAEA is advancing fundamental research and development activities related
to nuclear and reactor engineering, fuel and materials, as well as nuclear fusion and hightemperature gas reactor, etc.
○ In the area of fast reactor cycle technology, in December 2016, the Fast Reactor
Development Council decided to decommission the Monju facility without resuming its
operations and to integrate, to the greatest extent possible, the functions of Monju into
fast reactor research and development efforts going forward.
○ JAEA plans to consolidate and develop priorities for all of their reactors, including
research reactors, and to develop plans for safety measures for these facilities.
○ In promoting research and development activities, it is vital to develop connections andpartnerships between the industries that are introducing new technologies into the market
with the research facilities and universities that are creating new knowledge and value.
JAEC has pointed out the need for a network that crosses industry and research
institutions and universities, and for the establishment of a broad knowledge base.

The image of collaboration & cooperation between R&D institutions & industries
19

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017

【Chapter 5】 International initiatives
5-1 International cooperation○ Some developed countries continue to use nuclear energy, including nuclear power
generation, and some developing countries have introduced and expanded their use of
nuclear energy after the Fukushima accident. Given these circumstances, Japan is
expected to promote strategic international cooperation and collaboration premised on
the peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as nuclear nonproliferation, nuclear security,and safety and to demonstrate international leadership in nuclear nonproliferation andsecurity.
○ In the aftermath of the Fukushima accident, Japan promotes bilateral and multilateral
cooperation between the developing countries and developed countries while proactively
participating in the work of international organizations.

Cabinet Office Deputy Minister Hirotaka Ishihara speaking at the IAEA

5-2 Maintaining and strengthening nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation
regimes○ To create a safer and more peaceful world free of nuclear weapons, Japan is committed
to promoting nuclear disarmament diplomacy and striving to maintain and strengthen theinternational nuclear nonproliferation regime.
○ An overview is given of initiatives and recent trends in nuclear nonproliferation including
nuclear nonproliferation treaties (NPT), nuclear nonproliferation with respect to North
Korea and Iran, and initiatives against nuclear terrorism including nuclear security
summits and treaties to protect nuclear material and nuclear energy facilities.

20

Provisional Translation Nov 28, 2017
5-3 International use of nuclear energy and industry trends○ Although the Fukushima accident has had an enormous impact on all the countries
around the world using nuclear power, many of these countries maintain the policy tocontinuously use this energy source. An overview of nuclear energy policy and industry
trends in the US, UK, China, and other countries is given.
○ Given the international presence of Japan's nuclear industry, the Government andbusinesses must ensure that strict procedures and export controls are firmly in place
within the framework of the international nuclear nonproliferation regime. When granting
public credit, the Government is committed to assessing whether Japan's trading partners
comply with international policies to assure safety and their safety systems are in place
domestically, and disclose such information to the public.

*

*

21

*