Statement of Mutual Cooperation and Understanding between the U.S. Department of theTreasury and the Authorities of Japan to Improve International Tax Compliance and to
Facilitate Implementation of FATCA

Whereas, the United States of America (“United States”) and Japan have a longstanding andclose relationship with respect to mutual assistance in tax matters and desire to improve
international tax compliance by further building on that relationship;
Whereas, Article 26 of the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America
and the Government of Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal
Evasion With Respect to Taxes on Income, signed on November 6, 2003, at Washington, DC(the “Convention”) authorizes exchange of information for tax purposes;
Whereas, the United States enacted provisions commonly known as the Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act (“FATCA”), which introduce a reporting regime for financial institutions withrespect to certain accounts;
Whereas, the Authorities of Japan, as defined in subparagraph 1(e) of Section 1 of this Statement,
are supportive of the underlying policy goals of FATCA to improve tax compliance;
Whereas, FATCA has raised a number of issues, including that Japanese financial institutions
may not be able to comply with certain aspects of FATCA due to domestic legal impediments;
Whereas, intergovernmental cooperation to facilitate FATCA implementation would addressthese issues and reduce burdens for Japanese financial institutions;
Whereas, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Authorities of Japan (each, a“Participant”) desire to implement an arrangement to provide for cooperation to facilitate theimplementation of FATCA based on direct reporting by Japanese financial institutions to the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service, supplemented by the exchange of information upon request pursuant
to the Convention and subject to the confidentiality and other protections provided for therein,
including the provisions limiting the use of the information exchanged under the Convention;
Now, therefore, the Participants confirm the following:

Section 1
Definitions
1.
For purposes of this Statement, and any annexes thereto (“Statement”), the following
terms have the meanings described below:(a)

The term “United States” means the United States of America, and, when used ina geographical sense, means the territory of the United States of America,
including the States thereof, but does not include the U.S. Territories. Any1reference to a “State” of the United States includes the District of Columbia.
(b)

The term “U.S. Territory” means American Samoa, the Commonwealth of theNorthern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the U.S.
Virgin Islands.

(c)

The term “IRS” means the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.

(d)

The term “Japan,” when used in a geographical sense, means the territory ofJapan.

(e)

The term “Authorities of Japan” means the following:1) The Ministry of Finance of Japan2) The National Tax Agency of Japan
3) “Japanese Supervisory Authorities,” which means the following:(A)The Financial Services Agency of Japan (FSA),(B)The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan,(C)The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan, and(D)The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan(f)

The term “Partner Jurisdiction” means a jurisdiction that has in effect anagreement with the United States to facilitate the implementation of FATCA. The
IRS intends to publish a list identifying all Partner Jurisdictions.

(g)

The term “Competent Authority” means:
1) in the case of the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate;and2) in the case of Japan, the Minister of Finance or his authorized representative.

(h)

The term “Financial Institution” means a Custodial Institution, a Depository
Institution, an Investment Entity, or a Specified Insurance Company.

(i)

The term “Foreign Reportable Amount” means, in accordance with relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations, a payment of fixed or determinable annual or periodical
income that would be a withholdable payment if it were from sources within the
United States.

(j)

The term “Custodial Institution” means any Entity that holds, as a substantial
portion of its business, financial assets for the account of others. An Entity holds
financial assets for the account of others as a substantial portion of its business if
the Entity’s gross income attributable to the holding of financial assets and related
financial services equals or exceeds 20 percent of the Entity’s gross income
during the shorter of: (i) the three-year period that ends on December 31 (or the
final day of a non-calendar year accounting period) prior to the year in which thedetermination is being made; or (ii) the period during which the Entity has been in2

existence.
(k)

The term “Depository Institution” means any Entity that accepts deposits in theordinary course of a banking or similar business.

(l)

The term “Investment Entity” means any Entity that conducts as a business (oris managed by an Entity that conducts as a business) one or more of the following
activities or operations for or on behalf of a customer:
1) trading in money market instruments (cheques, bills, certificates of deposit,
derivatives, etc.); foreign exchange; exchange, interest rate and index
instruments; transferable securities; or commodity futures trading;2) individual and collective portfolio management; or3) otherwise investing, administering, or managing funds or money on behalf ofother persons.
This subparagraph 1(l) is to be interpreted in a manner consistent with similar
language in the definition of “financial institution” in the Financial Action Task
Force Recommendations.

(m)

The term “Specified Insurance Company” means any Entity that is an insurancecompany (or the holding company of an insurance company) that issues, or is
obligated to make payments with respect to, a Cash Value Insurance Contract oran Annuity Contract.

(n)

The term “Japanese Financial Institution” means (i) any Financial Institution
resident in Japan, but excluding any branch of such Financial Institution that is
located outside Japan, and (ii) any branch of a Financial Institution not resident inJapan, if such branch is located in Japan.

(o)

The term “Partner Jurisdiction Financial Institution” means (i) any Financial
Institution established in a Partner Jurisdiction, but excluding any branch of such
Financial Institution that is located outside the Partner Jurisdiction, and (ii) any
branch of a Financial Institution not established in the Partner Jurisdiction, if suchbranch is located in the Partner Jurisdiction.

(p)

The term “Reporting Japanese Financial Institution” means any Japanese
Financial Institution that is not a Non-Reporting Japanese Financial Institution.

(q)

The term “Non-Reporting Japanese Financial Institution” means any Japanese
Financial Institution, or other Entity resident in Japan, that is described in Annex
II as a Non-Reporting Japanese Financial Institution or that otherwise qualifies asa deemed-compliant FFI or an exempt beneficial owner under relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations.
3(r)The term “Nonparticipating Financial Institution” means a nonparticipating
FFI, as that term is defined in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, but does notinclude a Japanese Financial Institution or other Partner Jurisdiction Financial
Institution other than a Financial Institution treated as a Nonparticipating
Financial Institution in line with paragraph 2 of Section 4 of this Statement or thecorresponding provision in an agreement between the United States and a Partner
Jurisdiction.

(s)

The term “Preexisting Account” means a Financial Account maintained by aReporting Japanese Financial Institution as of December 31, 2013.

(t)

The term “New Account” means a Financial Account opened by a Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution on or after January 1, 2014.

(u)

The term “U.S. Account” means a Financial Account maintained by a Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution and held by one or more Specified U.S. Persons orby a Non-U.S. Entity with one or more Controlling Persons that is a Specified U.S.
Person. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an account should not be treated as a U.S.
Account if such account is not identified as a U.S. Account after application of thedue diligence procedures in Annex I.

(v)

The term “Non-Consenting U.S. Account” means a Preexisting Account withrespect to which (i) a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution has determined that
it is a U.S. Account in line with the due diligence procedures in Annex I, (ii) thelaws of Japan prohibit the reporting under the requirements of an FFI Agreement
absent consent of the Account Holder, (iii) the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution has sought, but was unable to obtain, the required consent to report or
the Account Holder’s U.S. TIN; and (iv) the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution has reported, or was required to report, aggregate account information
to the IRS as prescribed under sections 1471 to 1474 of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Code and the relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations.

(w)

The term “Financial Account” has the meaning described in relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations but does not include any account, product or arrangementthat is excluded from the definition of Financial Account in Annex II.

(x)

The term “FFI Agreement” means an agreement that describes the requirements,
consistent with this Statement, for a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution to betreated as complying with the requirements of section 1471(b) of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code.

(y)

The term “Account Holder” means the person listed or identified as the holder ofa Financial Account by the Financial Institution that maintains the account. A
person, other than a Financial Institution, holding a Financial Account for the
benefit or account of another person as agent, custodian, nominee, signatory,4

investment advisor, or intermediary, is not treated as holding the account for
purposes of this Statement, and such other person is treated as holding the account.
For purposes of the immediately preceding sentence, the term “Financial
Institution” does not include a Financial Institution organized or incorporated in a
U.S. Territory. In the case of a Cash Value Insurance Contract or an Annuity
Contract, the Account Holder is any person entitled to access the Cash Value orchange the beneficiary of the contract. If no person can access the Cash Value orchange the beneficiary, the Account Holder is any person named as the owner inthe contract and any person with a vested entitlement to payment under the termsof the contract. Upon the maturity of a Cash Value Insurance Contract or an
Annuity Contract, each person entitled to receive a payment under the contract istreated as an Account Holder.
(z)

The terms “Cash Value Insurance Contract” and “Annuity Contract” have themeanings described in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations.

(aa)

The term “U.S. Person” means a U.S. citizen or resident individual, a partnershipor corporation organized in the United States or under the laws of the UnitedStates or any State thereof, a trust if (i) a court within the United States would
have authority under applicable law to render orders or judgments concerning
substantially all issues regarding administration of the trust, and (ii) one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, oran estate of a decedent that is a citizen or resident of the United States. Thissubparagraph is to be interpreted in line with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.

(bb)

The term “Specified U.S. Person” means a U.S. Person, other than: (i) acorporation the stock of which is regularly traded on one or more establishedsecurities markets; (ii) any corporation that is a member of the same expanded
affiliated group, as defined in section 1471(e)(2) of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Code, as a corporation described in clause (i); (iii) the United States or any wholly
owned agency or instrumentality thereof; (iv) any State of the United States, any
U.S. Territory, any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or any wholly
owned agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing; (v) any
organization exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code or an individual retirement plan as defined in section 7701(a)(37)of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code; (vi) any bank as defined in section 581 of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code; (vii) any real estate investment trust as defined in
section 856 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code; (viii) any regulated investmentcompany as defined in section 851 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or any
entity registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under theInvestment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-64); (ix) any common trust fundas defined in section 584(a) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code; (x) any trust thatis exempt from tax under section 664(c) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or thatis described in section 4947(a)(1) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code; (xi) a dealer
in securities, commodities, or derivative financial instruments (including notional
principal contracts, futures, forwards, and options) that is registered as such under5

the laws of the United States or any State; or (xii) a broker as defined in section
6045(c) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
(cc)

The term “Entity” means a legal person or a legal arrangement such as a trust.

(dd)

The term “Non-U.S. Entity” means an Entity that is not a U.S. Person.

(ee)

An Entity is a “Related Entity” of another Entity if either Entity controls theother Entity, or the two Entities are under common control. For this purpose,control includes direct or indirect ownership of more than 50 percent of the voteor value in an Entity. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Japan may treat an Entity as
not a Related Entity of another Entity if the two Entities are not members of thesame expanded affiliated group as defined in section 1471(e)(2) of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code.

(ff)

The term “U.S. TIN” means a U.S. federal taxpayer identifying number.

(gg)

The term “Controlling Persons” means the natural persons who exercise control
over an Entity. In the case of a trust such term means the settlor, the trustees, theprotector (if any), the beneficiaries or class of beneficiaries, and any other natural
person exercising ultimate effective control over the trust, and in the case of alegal arrangement other than a trust, such term means persons in equivalent orsimilar positions. The term “Controlling Persons” is to be interpreted in a mannerconsistent with the Financial Action Task Force Recommendations.

2.
Any term not otherwise defined in this Statement, unless the context otherwise requires or
the U.S. Competent Authority and the Japanese Competent Authority confirm a common
meaning (as permitted by domestic law), is to have the meaning that it has at that time under thelaw of the country implementing this Statement, any meaning under the applicable tax laws ofthat country prevailing over a meaning given to the term under other laws of that country.
Section 2
Reporting and Exchange of Information
1.
Direction to Japanese Financial Institutions. The Japanese Supervisory Authorities arecommitted to direct and enable all Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions to:(a)register with the IRS by January 1, 2014, and implement the requirements of an
FFI Agreement;(b)with respect to Preexisting Accounts identified as U.S. Accounts,(i)request from each Account Holder the Account Holder’s U.S. TIN andconsent to report; and(ii)

report annually to the IRS, in the time and manner consistent with therequirements of an FFI Agreement and relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations,6the aggregate information required with respect to Non-Consenting U.S.
Accounts;(c)2.

with respect to accounts of, or obligations to, Nonparticipating Financial
Institutions that exist as of December 31, 2013, and in connection with which theReporting Japanese Financial Institution expects to pay a Foreign Reportable
Amount,(i)with respect to calendar years 2015 and 2016, request from each such
Nonparticipating Financial Institution consent to report;(ii)with respect to calendar years 2015 and 2016, report to the IRS the
number of non-consenting Nonparticipating Financial Institutions towhich Foreign Reportable Amounts were paid during the year and theaggregate value of all such payments no later than March 15 of the year
following the year to which the information relates;(d)with respect to New Accounts identified as U.S. Accounts, obtain from each
Account Holder consent to report, consistent with the requirements of an FFI
Agreement, as a condition of account opening; and(e)with respect to new accounts opened by, or obligations entered into with, aNonparticipating Financial Institution on or after January 1, 2014, and inconnection with which the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution expects to pay
a Foreign Reportable Amount, obtain from each such Nonparticipating Financial
Institution consent to report, consistent with the requirements of an FFI
Agreement, as a condition of opening the account, or entering into the obligation.

Exchange of Information.
(a)In the context of FATCA implementation, the U.S. Competent Authority may
make group requests to the Japanese Competent Authority based on the aggregate
information reported to the IRS pursuant to the direction described in subparagraphs 1(b)(ii) and 1(c)(ii) of this Section, for the information about NonConsenting U.S. Accounts and Foreign Reportable Amounts paid to Nonparticipating Financial Institutions that the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
would have had to report under the requirements of an FFI Agreement had it obtained consent. It is expected that such requests be made pursuant to Article 26 of
the Convention and apply to information for the time period beginning on or after
the date of commencement of this Statement.

(b)

The information requested pursuant to subparagraph 2(a) of this Section would beconsidered information that may be relevant for carrying out the administration or
enforcement of the domestic laws of the United States concerning taxes coveredby the Convention and under which taxation is not contrary to the Convention,
without regard to whether the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution or anotherparty has contributed to non-compliance of the taxpayers in the group.
7

(c)The Japanese Competent Authority should, within 6 months of the receipt of agroup request from the U.S. Competent Authority for the information described insubparagraph 2(a) of this Section, exchange such requested information with the
U.S. Competent Authority in the same format in which the information would
have been reported if it had been reported directly to the IRS by the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution. The Japanese Competent Authority should notify
the U.S. Competent Authority and the relevant Reporting Japanese Financial Institution if there will be any delay in the exchange of the requested information. In
such case, the Japanese Competent Authority would exchange the requested information with the U.S. Competent Authority as soon as possible.

(d)

Notwithstanding subparagraph 2(c) of this Section, the Japanese Competent Authority is not expected to obtain and exchange the U.S. TIN of the Account Holder
of a Non-Consenting U.S. Account if such U.S. TIN is not in the records of theReporting Japanese Financial Institution. In such a case, the Japanese Competent
Authority should obtain and include in the exchanged information the date ofbirth of the relevant person, if the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution has
such date of birth in its records.

3.
The information exchanged between the Competent Authorities of both countries in linewith this Section would be subject to the confidentiality and other protections provided for in theConvention, including the provisions limiting the use of the information exchanged.
Section 3
Application of FATCA to Japanese Financial Institutions
1.
Treatment of Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions. Except as described inparagraph 2 of Section 4 of this Statement, each Reporting Japanese Financial Institution that
registers and implements the requirements of an FFI Agreement should be treated as complying
with the requirements of, and as not subject to withholding under, section 1471 of the U.S.
Internal Revenue Code.
2.

Suspension of Rules Relating to Non-Consenting U.S. Accounts.
(a)

Except as described in subparagraph 2(b) of this Section, the United States should
not require a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution to withhold tax under
section 1471 or 1472 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code with respect to an
account held by a recalcitrant account holder (as defined in section 1471(d)(6) of
the U.S. Internal Revenue Code), or to close such account, if:(i)the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution complies with the directions
in paragraph 1 of Section 2 of this Statement with respect to the account;
and

(ii)

the Japanese Competent Authority exchanges with the U.S. Competent8Authority the requested information described in subparagraph 2(a) of
Section 2 of this Statement within 6 months from the date of the receipt ofsuch request.
(b)

If the condition of subparagraph 2(a)(ii) of this Section is not fulfilled, unlessotherwise confirmed between the Competent Authorities, the U.S. Competent
Authority may determine that there is significant non-compliance with respect toa Reporting Japanese Financial Institution with the requirements of an FFI
Agreement or the conditions of this Statement, as described in paragraph 2 ofSection 4 of this Statement, beginning on the date that is 6 months after the dateof the receipt of the request described in subparagraph 2(a) of Section 2 of thisStatement, and, notwithstanding subparagraph 2(b) of Section 4 of this Statement,
may treat the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution as a Nonparticipating
Financial Institution beginning 3 months after the date of such determination ofsignificant non-compliance and ending on the date on which the JapaneseCompetent Authority exchanges the requested information with the U.S.
Competent Authority.

3.
Specific Treatment of Retirement Plans. The United States should treat as exempt
beneficial owners or deemed-compliant FFIs, as appropriate, for purposes of sections 1471 and1472 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code Japanese retirement plans established or located in, andregulated by, Japan and described in Annex II. For this purpose, a Japanese retirement plan
includes an Entity established or located in, and regulated by Japan, or a predetermined
contractual or legal arrangement operated to provide pension or retirement benefits or earn
income for providing such benefits under the laws of Japan and regulated with respect tocontributions, distributions, reporting, sponsorship, and taxation.
4.
Identification and Treatment of Other Deemed Compliant FFIs and Exempt
Beneficial Owners. The United States should treat each other Non-Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution as a deemed-compliant FFI or as an exempt beneficial owner, as appropriate,
for purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
5.
Special Rules Regarding Related Entities and Branches That Are Nonparticipating
Financial Institutions. If a Japanese Financial Institution that otherwise meets the conditions
described in Section 2 of this Statement or is described in paragraph 3 or 4 of this Section has a
Related Entity or branch that operates in a jurisdiction that prevents such Related Entity or
branch from fulfilling the requirements of a participating FFI or deemed-compliant FFI for
purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, such Japanese Financial Institution
should continue to be treated as a participating FFI, deemed-compliant FFI, or exempt beneficial
owner, as appropriate, for purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, provided
that:
(a)

The Japanese Financial Institution treats each such Related Entity or branch as aseparate Nonparticipating Financial Institution, and each such branch or Related
Entity identifies itself to withholding agents as a Nonparticipating Financial
Institution;
9(b)Each such Related Entity or branch identifies its U.S. accounts and reports to the
IRS the information with respect to those accounts as required under section 1471
of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code to the extent permitted under the relevant laws
pertaining to the Related Entity or branch; and(c)Such Related Entity or branch does not specifically solicit U.S. accounts held bypersons that are not resident in the jurisdiction where such Related Entity or
branch is located or accounts held by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions thatare not established in the jurisdiction where such branch or Related Entity is
located, and such Related Entity or branch is not used by the Japanese Financial
Institution or any other Related Entity to circumvent the conditions of thisStatement or the requirements of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code,as appropriate.

6.
Coordination of Definitions with U.S. Treasury Regulations. Notwithstanding Section
1 of this Statement and the definitions described in the Annexes to this Statement, in implementing this Statement, the Authorities of Japan may use, and may permit Japanese Financial Institutions to use, a definition in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations in lieu of a corresponding definition in this Agreement, but should not do so where such application would frustrate the purposesof this Statement.
Section 4
Verification and Enforcement
1. Minor and Administrative Errors. The IRS may contact a Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution where it has reason to believe that administrative errors or other minor errors may
have led to incorrect or incomplete information reporting or resulted in other infringements of
the requirements of an FFI Agreement.
2.

Significant Non-Compliance.
(a)

The IRS may notify the Financial Services Agency of Japan, which serves as acentral contact point of the Japanese Supervisory Authorities on this issue, whenthe IRS has determined that there is significant non-compliance with therequirements of an FFI Agreement or the conditions of this Statement withrespect to a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution. The Japanese Supervisory
Authorities should apply their official guidance to address the significant noncompliance.

(b)

If the non-compliance is not resolved within a period of 12 months after
notification of significant non-compliance is first provided by the IRS, the UnitedStates may treat the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution as a
Nonparticipating Financial Institution.

3. Competent Authority Mutual Agreement. The Competent Authorities of Japan and theUnited States may enter into an agreement under the mutual agreement procedure provided
10

for in Article 25 of the Convention to:(a)

Establish the procedures for the exchange of information described in paragraph 2of Section 2 of this Statement; and(b)

Prescribe rules and procedures as may be necessary to implement this Section.

4. Reliance on Third Party Service Providers. Consistent with the requirements of an FFI
Agreement and relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions
may use third party service providers to fulfill the requirements of an FFI Agreement, butthese requirements would remain the responsibility of the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institutions.
Section 5
Mutual Commitment to Continue to Enhance the Effectiveness of Information
Exchange and Transparency
1.
Treatment of Passthru Payments and Gross Proceeds. The Participants are committed
to work together, along with Partner Jurisdictions, to develop a practical and effective alternative
approach to achieve the policy objectives of foreign passthru payment and gross proceeds
withholding that minimizes burden.
2.
Development of Common Reporting and Exchange Model. The Participants arecommitted to working with Partner Jurisdictions and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development on adapting the terms of this Statement and of agreements between
the United States and Partner Jurisdictions to a common model for automatic exchange of
information, including the development of reporting and due diligence standards for financial
institutions.
Section 6
Consistency in the Application of FATCA to Partner Jurisdictions
1.
The Authorities of Japan and Japanese Financial Institutions should be granted the benefitof any more favorable treatment under Section 3 or Annex I of this Statement relating to theapplication of FATCA to Japanese Financial Institutions afforded to another Partner Jurisdiction
under a bilateral arrangement or agreement pursuant to which the other Partner Jurisdiction
implements the same duties as the Authorities of Japan and Japanese Financial Institutions
described in Section 2 of this Statement consistently with the same terms and conditions as
described therein and in Sections 4, 6, 8, and 9 of this Statement.
2.
The IRS should notify the Ministry of Finance of Japan of any such more favorable
treatment, and such more favorable treatment should be implemented automatically under thisStatement as if it were specified in this Statement and implemented as of the date ofcommencement of the arrangement or agreement incorporating the more favorable treatment,
unless the Ministry of Finance of Japan declines the implementation thereof after consulting withother members of the Authorities of Japan.
11Section 7
Reciprocal Information Exchange
Consistent with its obligations under the Convention, the United States should continue tocooperate with the Japanese Competent Authority to respond to requests pursuant to theConvention to collect and exchange information on accounts held in U.S. financial institutions
by residents of Japan.
Section 8
Consultations and Modifications
1.
In case any difficulties in the implementation or interpretation of this Statement arise,either Participant may request consultations to develop appropriate measures to ensure thefulfillment of this Statement.
2.

This Statement may be modified by written mutual consent of the Participants.
Section 9
Annexes

The Annexes form an integral part of this Statement. Annex I describes the due diligenceprocedures that the Authorities of Japan intend to direct Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions
to apply in order to identify U.S. Accounts and accounts held by Nonparticipating Financial
Institutions in a manner that complies with the requirements of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code. Annex II describes entities that for purposes of relevant U.S. Treasury
Regulations are exempt beneficial owners or deemed-compliant FFIs, as the case may be, andaccounts that are excluded from the definition of Financial Accounts.
Section 10
Term of Statement
1.

This Statement starts to be implemented on June 11, 2013.

2.
Either Participant may discontinue this Statement at any time, but should endeavor togive 12 months’ notice of its intent to discontinue in writing to the other Participant.
3. The Participants may, prior to December 31, 2016, consult in good faith to modify thisStatement as necessary to reflect progress on the commitments described in Section 5 of thisStatement.
4. This Statement is to be implemented consistently with existing laws in force in each country
and should not be interpreted to create any legal obligations.
Annexes
Annex I
Annex II

Due Diligence
Non Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions and Excluded Accounts
12

ANNEX I
DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURES FOR IDENTIFYING AND REPORTING ON U.S.
ACCOUNTS AND ON PAYMENTS TO CERTAIN NONPARTICIPATINGFINANCIAL INSTITUTIONSThis Annex I describes the due diligence procedures that the Authorities of Japan intend todirect Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions to apply in order to identify U.S. Account andaccounts held by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions in a manner that complies with therequirements of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
I.

General.
A.
Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions must identify U.S. Accounts andaccounts held by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions in accordance with the due
diligence procedures contained in this Annex I in order to be treated as complying
with the requirements of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
B.

For purposes of the Statement,
1.
All dollar amounts are in U.S. dollars and include the equivalent inother currencies.
2.
The balance or value of an account is determined as of the last day ofthe calendar year, or in the case of a Cash Value Insurance Contract or an
Annuity Contract, as of the last day of the calendar year or the most recent
contract anniversary date.
3.
Subject to subparagraph E(1) of section II of this Annex I, an account istreated as a U.S. Account beginning as of the date it is identified as such
pursuant to the due diligence procedures in this Annex I.
4.
Unless otherwise provided, information with respect to a U.S. Accountmust be reported annually in the calendar year following the year to which theinformation relates.

C.
As an alternative to the procedures described in each section of this Annex I,
Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions may rely on the procedures described in
relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations to establish whether an account is a U.S. Accountor an account held by a Nonparticipating Financial Institution, except that if an
account is treated as held by a recalcitrant account holder under procedures describedin relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, such account is to be treated as a U.S. Accountfor purposes of this Statement. Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions may makesuch election separately for each section of this Annex I either with respect to all
relevant Financial Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified groupof such accounts (such as by line of business or the location of where the account ismaintained). Except as otherwise provided in an FFI Agreement, once a Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution has chosen to rely on the procedures in relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations with respect to any group of accounts, such Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution must continue to apply such procedures consistently in all1

subsequent years, unless there has been a material modification to relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations.
II.
Preexisting Individual Accounts. The following rules and procedures apply for
purposes of identifying U.S. Accounts among Preexisting Accounts held by individuals(“Preexisting Individual Accounts”).
A.
Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified, or Reported. Unlessthe Reporting Japanese Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all
Preexisting Individual Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified
group of such accounts, the following Preexisting Individual Accounts are not required
to be reviewed, identified, or reported as U.S. Accounts:
1.
Subject to subparagraph E(2) of this section, a Preexisting Individual
Account with a balance or value that does not exceed $50,000 as of December
31, 2013.
2.
Subject to subparagraph E(2) of this section, a Preexisting Individual
Account that is a Cash Value Insurance Contract or an Annuity Contract with abalance or value of $250,000 or less as of December 31, 2013.
3.
A Preexisting Individual Account that is a Cash Value Insurance
Contract or an Annuity Contract, provided the law or regulations of Japan or
the United States effectively prevent the sale of such a Cash Value Insurance
Contract or an Annuity Contract to U.S. residents (e.g., if the relevant Financial
Institution does not have the required registration under U.S. law, and the lawof Japan requires reporting or withholding with respect to insurance products
held by residents of Japan).
4.

A Depository Account with a balance of $50,000 or less.

B.
Review Procedures for Preexisting Individual Accounts With a Balance or
Value as of December 31, 2013, that Exceeds $50,000 ($250,000 for a Cash Value
Insurance Contract or Annuity Contract), But Does Not Exceed $1,000,000(“Lower Value Accounts”).
1.
Electronic Record Search. The Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution must review electronically searchable data maintained by theReporting Japanese Financial Institution for any of the following U.S. indicia:a)
Identification of the Account Holder as a U.S. citizen or
resident;b)

Unambiguous indication of a U.S. place of birth;c)Current U.S. mailing or residence address (including a U.S. post
office box);d)Current U.S. telephone number;2e)Standing instructions to transfer funds to an account maintainedin the United States;f)Currently effective power of attorney or signatory authority
granted to a person with a U.S. address; org)
An “in-care-of” or “hold mail” address that is the sole address
the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution has on file for the AccountHolder. In the case of a Preexisting Individual Account that is a Lower
Value Account, an “in-care-of” address outside the United States or“hold mail” address shall not be treated as U.S. indicia.
2.
If none of the U.S. indicia listed in subparagraph B(1) of this section are
discovered in the electronic search, then no further action is required until there
is a change in circumstances that results in one or more U.S. indicia being
associated with the account, or the account becomes a High Value Accountdescribed in paragraph D of this section.
3.
If any of the U.S. indicia listed in subparagraph B(1) of this section are
discovered in the electronic search, or if there is a change in circumstances that
results in one or more U.S. indicia being associated with the account, then theReporting Japanese Financial Institution must treat the account as a U.S.
Account unless it elects to apply subparagraph B(4) of this section and one of
the exceptions in such subparagraph applies with respect to that account.
4.
Notwithstanding a finding of U.S. indicia under subparagraph B(1) of
this section, a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is not required to treat
an account as a U.S. Account if:a)Where the Account Holder information unambiguously indicatesa U.S. place of birth, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
obtains, or has previously reviewed and maintains a record of:(1)
A self-certification that the Account Holder is neither a
U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident for tax purposes (which may beon an IRS Form W-8 or other similar agreed form);(2)
A non-U.S. passport or other government-issued
identification evidencing the Account Holder’s citizenship or
nationality in a country other than the United States; and(3)
A copy of the Account Holder’s Certificate of Loss of
Nationality of the United States or a reasonable explanation of:(a) The reason the Account Holder does not have such acertificate despite relinquishing U.S. citizenship; or(b) The reason the Account Holder did not obtain U.S.
citizenship at birth.

3b)Where the Account Holder information contains a current U.S.
mailing or residence address, or one or more U.S. telephone numbersthat are the only telephone numbers associated with the account, theReporting Japanese Financial Institution obtains, or has previously
reviewed and maintains a record of:(1)
A self-certification that the Account Holder is neither a
U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident for tax purposes (which may beon an IRS Form W-8 or other similar agreed form); and(2)Documentary evidence, as defined in paragraph D ofsection VI of this Annex I, establishing the Account Holder’snon-U.S. status.
c)
Where the Account Holder information contains standing
instructions to transfer funds to an account maintained in the UnitedStates, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution obtains, or has
previously reviewed and maintains a record of:(1)
A self-certification that the Account Holder is neither a
U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident for tax purposes (which may beon an IRS Form W-8 or other similar agreed form); and(2)Documentary evidence, as defined in paragraph D ofsection VI of this Annex I, establishing the Account Holder’snon-U.S. status.
d)Where the Account Holder information contains a currently
effective power of attorney or signatory authority granted to a personwith a U.S. address, has an “in-care-of” address or “hold mail”
address that is the sole address identified for the Account Holder, or
has one or more U.S. telephone numbers (if a non-U.S. telephone
number is also associated with the account), the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution obtains, or has previously reviewed and maintains
a record of:(1)
A self-certification that the Account Holder is neither a
U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident for tax purposes (which may beon an IRS Form W-8 or other similar agreed form); or(2)
Documentary evidence, as defined in paragraph D ofsection VI of this Annex I, establishing the Account Holder’snon-U.S. status.
C.
Additional Procedures Applicable to Preexisting Individual Accounts That
Are Lower Value Accounts.
1.
Review of Preexisting Individual Accounts that are Lower Value
Accounts for U.S. indicia must be completed by December 31, 2015.
2.

If there is a change of circumstances with respect to a Preexisting4

Individual Account that is a Lower Value Account that results in one or more
U.S. indicia described in subparagraph B(1) of this section being associatedwith the account, then the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must treat
the account as a U.S. Account unless subparagraph B(4) of this section applies.
3.
Except for Depository Accounts described in subparagraph A(4) of thissection, any Preexisting Individual Account that has been identified as a U.S.
Account under this section shall be treated as a U.S. Account in all subsequent
years, unless the Account Holder ceases to be a Specified U.S. Person.
D.
Enhanced Review Procedures for Preexisting Individual Accounts With a
Balance or Value That Exceeds $1,000,000 as of December 31, 2013, or December
31 of Any Subsequent Year (“High Value Accounts”).
1.
Electronic Record Search. The Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution must review electronically searchable data maintained by theReporting Japanese Financial Institution for any of the U.S. indicia describedin subparagraph B(1) of this section.
2.
Paper Record Search. If the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution’s electronically searchable databases include fields for, and capture
all of the information described in, subparagraph D(3) of this section, then no
further paper record search is required. If the electronic databases do not
capture all of this information, then with respect to a High Value Account, theReporting Japanese Financial Institution must also review the current customer
master file and, to the extent not contained in the current customer master file,the following documents associated with the account and obtained by theReporting Japanese Financial Institution within the last five years for any of the
U.S. indicia described in subparagraph B(1) of this section:a)
The most recent documentary evidence collected with respect tothe account;b)

The most recent account opening contract or documentation;c)
The most recent documentation obtained by the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution pursuant to AML/KYC Procedures or forother regulatory purposes;d)Any power of attorney or signature authority forms currently ineffect; ande)

Any standing instructions to transfer funds currently in effect.

3.
Exception Where Databases Contain Sufficient Information. A
Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is not required to perform the paper
record search described in subparagraph D(2) of this section if the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution’s electronically searchable information includes
the following:5

a)

The Account Holder’s nationality or residence status;b)
The Account Holder’s residence address and mailing address
currently on file with the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution;c)
The Account Holder’s telephone number(s) currently on file, ifany, with the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution;d)Whether there are standing instructions to transfer funds in theaccount to another account (including an account at another branch of
the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution or another Financial
Institution);e)Whether there is a current “in-care-of” address or “hold mail”
address for the Account Holder; andf)Whether there is any power of attorney or signatory authority forthe account.
4.
Relationship Manager Inquiry for Actual Knowledge. In addition to
the electronic and paper record searches described above, the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must treat as a U.S. Account any High Value
Account assigned to a relationship manager (including any Financial Accounts
aggregated with such High Value Account) if the relationship manager has
actual knowledge that the Account Holder is a Specified U.S. Person.
5.

Effect of Finding U.S. Indicia.
a)
If none of the U.S. indicia listed in subparagraph B(1) of thissection are discovered in the enhanced review of High Value Accounts
described above, and the account is not identified as held by a Specified
U.S. Person in subparagraph D(4) of this section, then no further action
is required until there is a change in circumstances that results in one ormore U.S. indicia being associated with the account.
b)
If any of the U.S. indicia listed in subparagraph B(1) of thissection are discovered in the enhanced review of High Value Accounts
described above, or if there is a subsequent change in circumstancesthat results in one or more U.S. indicia being associated with theaccount, then the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must treat
the account as a U.S. Account unless it elects to apply subparagraph
B(4) of this section and one of the exceptions in such subparagraphapplies with respect to that account.
c)
Except for Depository Accounts described in subparagraph A(4)of this section, any Preexisting Individual Account that has been
identified as a U.S. Account under this section shall be treated as a U.S.
Account in all subsequent years, unless the Account Holder ceases tobe a Specified U.S. Person.

6

E.

Additional Procedures Applicable to High Value Accounts.
1.
If a Preexisting Individual Account is a High Value Account as ofDecember 31, 2013, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution mustcomplete the enhanced review procedures described in paragraph D of thissection with respect to such account by December 31, 2014. If based on thisreview such account is identified as a U.S. Account, the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution must report the required information about such accountwith respect to 2013 and 2014 in the first report on the account. For all
subsequent years, information about the account must be reported on an annual
basis.
2.
If a Preexisting Individual Account is not a High Value Account as ofDecember 31, 2013, but becomes a High Value Account as of the last day of asubsequent calendar year, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution mustcomplete the enhanced review procedures described in paragraph D of thissection with respect to such account within six months after the last day of thecalendar year in which the account becomes a High Value Account. If based on
this review such account is identified as a U.S. Account, the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must report the required information about suchaccount with respect to the year in which it is identified as a U.S. Account andsubsequent years on an annual basis, unless the Account Holder ceases to be aSpecified U.S. Person.
3.
Once a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution applies the enhanced
review procedures described in paragraph D of this section to a High Value
Account, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is not required to reapply such procedures, other than the relationship manager inquiry described insubparagraph D(4) of this section, to the same High Value Account in any
subsequent year.
4.
If there is a change of circumstances with respect to a High Value
Account that results in one or more U.S. indicia described in subparagraph
B(1) of this section being associated with the account, then the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must treat the account as a U.S. Account unless
it elects to apply subparagraph B(4) of this section and one of the exceptions insuch subparagraph applies with respect to that account.
5.
A Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must implement procedures
to ensure that a relationship manager identifies any change in circumstances ofan account. For example, if a relationship manager is notified that the AccountHolder has a new mailing address in the United States, the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution is required to treat the new address as a change incircumstances and, if it elects to apply subparagraph B(4) of this section, is
required to obtain the appropriate documentation from the Account Holder.

F.
Preexisting Individual Accounts That Have Been Documented for Certain
Other Purposes. A Reporting Japanese Financial Institution that has previously
obtained documentation from an Account Holder to establish the Account Holder’s
status as neither a U.S. citizen nor a U.S. resident in order to meet its obligations under7

a qualified intermediary, withholding foreign partnership, or withholding foreign trust
agreement with the IRS, or to fulfill its obligations under chapter 61 of Title 26 of theUnited States Code, is not required to perform the procedures described insubparagraph B(1) of this section with respect to Lower Value Accounts or
subparagraphs D(1) through D(3) of this section with respect to High Value Accounts.
III.
New Individual Accounts. The following rules and procedures apply for purposes ofidentifying U.S. Accounts among Financial Accounts held by individuals and opened on orafter January 1, 2014 (“New Individual Accounts”).
A.
Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified, or Reported. Unlessthe Reporting Japanese Financial Institution elects otherwise, either with respect to all
New Individual Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified group ofsuch accounts, the following New Individual Accounts are not required to be reviewed,
identified, or reported as U.S. Accounts:
1.
A Depository Account unless the account balance exceeds $50,000 at
the end of any calendar year.
2.
A Cash Value Insurance Contract unless the cash value exceeds $50,000
at the end of any calendar year.
B.
Other New Individual Accounts. With respect to New Individual Accounts
not described in paragraph A of this section, upon account opening (or within 90 days
after the end of the calendar year in which the account ceases to be described inparagraph A of this section), the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must obtain aself-certification, which may be part of the account opening documentation, thatallows the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution to determine whether the AccountHolder is resident in the United States for tax purposes (for this purpose, a U.S. citizen
is considered to be resident in the United States for tax purposes, even if the AccountHolder is also a tax resident of another jurisdiction) and confirm the reasonableness ofsuch self-certification based on the information obtained by the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution in connection with the opening of the account, including any
documentation collected pursuant to AML/KYC Procedures.
1.
If the self-certification establishes that the Account Holder is resident in
the United States for tax purposes, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
must treat the account as a U.S. Account and obtain a self-certification that
includes the Account Holder’s U.S. TIN (which may be an IRS Form W-9 orother similar agreed form).
2.
If there is a change of circumstances with respect to a New Individual
Account that causes the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution to know, or
have reason to know, that the original self-certification is incorrect or
unreliable, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution cannot rely on theoriginal self-certification and must obtain a valid self-certification that
establishes whether the Account Holder is a U.S. citizen or resident for U.S.
tax purposes. If the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is unable toobtain a valid self-certification, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
must treat the account as a Non-Consenting U.S. Account.
8

IV.
Preexisting Entity Accounts. The following rules and procedures apply for purposesof identifying U.S. Accounts and accounts held by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions
among Preexisting Accounts held by Entities (“Preexisting Entity Accounts”).
A.
Entity Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified, or Reported.
Unless the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution elects otherwise, either withrespect to all Preexisting Entity Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly
identified group of such accounts, a Preexisting Entity Account with an accountbalance or value that does not exceed $250,000 as of December 31, 2013, is not
required to be reviewed, identified, or reported as a U.S. Account until the accountbalance or value exceeds $1,000,000.
B.
Entity Accounts Subject to Review. A Preexisting Entity Account that has anaccount balance or value that exceeds $250,000 as of December 31, 2013, and aPreexisting Entity Account that initially does not exceed $250,000 but the accountbalance or value of which later exceeds $1,000,000, must be reviewed in accordancewith the procedures set forth in paragraph D of this section.
C.
Entity Accounts With Respect to Which Reporting Is Required. With
respect to Preexisting Entity Accounts described in paragraph B of this section, only
accounts that are held by one or more Entities that are Specified U.S. Persons, or by
Passive NFFEs with one or more Controlling Persons who are U.S. citizens orresidents, shall be treated as U.S. Accounts. In addition, accounts held by
Nonparticipating Financial Institutions shall be treated as accounts for which
aggregate payments are required to be reported under an FFI Agreement.
D.
Review Procedures for Identifying Entity Accounts With Respect to Which
Reporting Is Required. For Preexisting Entity Accounts described in paragraph B ofthis section, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must apply the following
review procedures to determine whether the account is held by one or more Specified
U.S. Persons, by Passive NFFEs with one or more Controlling Persons who are U.S.
citizens or residents, or by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions:
1.

Determine Whether the Entity Is a Specified U.S. Person.
a)
Review information maintained for regulatory or customer
relationship purposes (including information collected pursuant to
AML/KYC Procedures) to determine whether the information indicatesthat the Account Holder is a U.S. Person. For this purpose, information
indicating that the Account Holder is a U.S. Person includes a U.S.
place of incorporation or organization, or a U.S. address.
b)
If the information indicates that the Account Holder is a U.S.
Person, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must treat theaccount as a U.S. Account unless it obtains a self-certification from the
Account Holder (which may be on an IRS Form W-8 or W-9, or asimilar agreed form), or reasonably determines based on information inits possession or that is publicly available, that the Account Holder is
not a Specified U.S. Person.

92.

Determine Whether a Non-U.S. Entity Is a Financial Institution.
a)
Review information maintained for regulatory or customer
relationship purposes (including information collected pursuant to
AML/KYC Procedures) to determine whether the information indicatesthat the Account Holder is a Financial Institution.
b)
If the information indicates that the Account Holder is a
Financial Institution, or the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
verifies the Account Holder’s Global Intermediary Identification
Number on the published IRS FFI list, then the account is not a U.S.
Account.

3.
Determine Whether a Financial Institution Is a Nonparticipating
Financial Institution Payments to Which Are Subject to Aggregate
Reporting Consistent with the Requirements of an FFI Agreement.
a)Subject to subparagraph D(3)(b) of this section, a Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution may determine that the Account Holder
is a Japanese Financial Institution or other Partner Jurisdiction
Financial Institution if the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
reasonably determines that the Account Holder has such status on thebasis of the Account Holder’s Global Intermediary Identification
Number on the published IRS FFI list or other information that is
publicly available or in the possession of the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution, as applicable. In such case, no further review,
identification, or reporting is required with respect to the account.
b)
If the Account Holder is a Japanese Financial Institution or other
Partner Jurisdiction Financial Institution treated by the IRS as a
Nonparticipating Financial Institution, then the account is not a U.S.
Account, but payments to the Account Holder must be reported
consistent with the requirements of an FFI Agreement.
c)
If the Account Holder is not a Japanese Financial Institution orother Partner Jurisdiction Financial Institution, then the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must treat the Account Holder as a
Nonparticipating Financial Institution payments to which are reportableconsistent with the requirements of an FFI Agreement, unless theReporting Japanese Financial Institution:(1)
Obtains a self-certification (which may be on an IRS
Form W-8 or similar agreed form) from the Account Holder that
it is a certified deemed-compliant FFI, or an exempt beneficial
owner, as those terms are defined in relevant U.S. Treasury
Regulations; or(2)
In the case of a participating FFI or registered deemedcompliant FFI, verifies the Account Holder’s Global
Intermediary Identification Number on the published IRS FFI
10

list.
4.
Determine Whether an Account Held by an NFFE Is a U.S. Account.
With respect to an Account Holder of a Preexisting Entity Account that is not
identified as either a U.S. Person or a Financial Institution, the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must identify (i) whether the Account Holder has
Controlling Persons, (ii) whether the Account Holder is a Passive NFFE, and(iii) whether any of the Controlling Persons of the Account Holder is a U.S.
citizen or resident. In making these determinations the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution must follow the guidance in subparagraphs D(4)(a)through D(4)(d) of this section in the order most appropriate under thecircumstances.
a)
For purposes of determining the Controlling Persons of an
Account Holder, a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution may rely on
information collected and maintained pursuant to AML/KYC
Procedures.
b)
For purposes of determining whether the Account Holder is a
Passive NFFE, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must obtaina self-certification (which may be on an IRS Form W-8 or W-9, or on asimilar agreed form) from the Account Holder to establish its status,
unless it has information in its possession or that is publicly available,
based on which it can reasonably determine that the Account Holder isan Active NFFE.
c)
For purposes of determining whether a Controlling Person of a
Passive NFFE is a U.S. citizen or resident for tax purposes, a Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution may rely on:(1)
Information collected and maintained pursuant to
AML/KYC Procedures in the case of a Preexisting Entity
Account held by one or more NFFEs with an account balance orvalue that does not exceed $1,000,000; or(2)
A self-certification (which may be on an IRS Form W-8
or W-9, or on a similar agreed form) from the Account Holder
or such Controlling Person in the case of a Preexisting Entity
Account held by one or more NFFEs with an account balance orvalue that exceeds $1,000,000.
d)
If any Controlling Person of a Passive NFFE is a U.S. citizen or
resident, the account shall be treated as a U.S. Account.
E.
Timing of Review and Additional Procedures Applicable to Preexisting
Entity Accounts.
1.
Review of Preexisting Entity Accounts with an account balance or valuethat exceeds $250,000 as of December 31, 2013 must be completed by
December 31, 2015.
11

2.
Review of Preexisting Entity Accounts with an account balance or valuethat does not exceed $250,000 as of December 31, 2013, but exceeds$1,000,000 as of December 31 of a subsequent year, must be completed within
six months after the last day of the calendar year in which the account balanceor value exceeds $1,000,000.
3.
If there is a change of circumstances with respect to a Preexisting Entity
Account that causes the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution to know, or
have reason to know, that the self-certification or other documentation
associated with an account is incorrect or unreliable, the Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution must redetermine the status of the account in accordancewith the procedures set forth in paragraph D of this section.
V.
New Entity Accounts. The following rules and procedures apply for purposes ofidentifying U.S. Accounts and accounts held by Nonparticipating Financial Institutions among
Financial Accounts held by Entities and opened on or after January 1, 2014 (“New Entity
Accounts”).
A.
Entity Accounts Not Required to Be Reviewed, Identified or Reported.
Unless the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution elects otherwise, either withrespect to all New Entity Accounts or, separately, with respect to any clearly identified
group of such accounts, a credit card account or revolving credit facility treated as a
New Entity Account is not required to be reviewed, identified, or reported, provided
that the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution maintaining such account implements
policies and procedures to prevent an account balance owed to the Account Holderthat exceeds $50,000.
B.
Other New Entity Accounts. With respect to New Entity Accounts notdescribed in paragraph A of this section, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
must determine whether the Account Holder is: (i) a Specified U.S. Person; (ii) a
Japanese Financial Institution or other Partner Jurisdiction Financial Institution; (iii) a
participating FFI, a deemed-compliant FFI, or an exempt beneficial owner, as thoseterms are defined in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations; or (iv) an Active NFFE or
Passive NFFE.
1.
Subject to subparagraph B(2) of this section, a Reporting Japanese
Financial Institution may determine that the Account Holder is an Active NFFE,
a Japanese Financial Institution, or other Partner Jurisdiction Financial
Institution if the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution reasonably
determines that the Account Holder has such status on the basis of the AccountHolder’s Global Intermediary Identification Number or other information thatis publicly available or in the possession of the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution, as applicable.
2.
If the Account Holder is a Japanese Financial Institution or other
Partner Jurisdiction Financial Institution treated by the IRS as a
Nonparticipating Financial Institution, then the account is not a U.S. Account,but payments to the Account Holder must be reported consistent with therequirements of an FFI Agreement.
123.
In all other cases, a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution mustobtain a self-certification from the Account Holder to establish the AccountHolder’s status. Based on the self-certification, the following rules apply:a)
If the Account Holder is a Specified U.S. Person, the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must treat the account as a U.S. Account.
b)
If the Account Holder is a Passive NFFE, the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution must identify the Controlling Persons as
determined under AML/KYC Procedures, and must determine whether
any such person is a U.S. citizen or resident on the basis of a selfcertification from the Account Holder or such person. If any such
person is a U.S. citizen or resident, the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution must treat the account as a U.S. Account.
c)
If the Account Holder is: (i) a U.S. Person that is not a Specified
U.S. Person; (ii) subject to subparagraph B(3)(d) of this section, aJapanese Financial Institution or other Partner Jurisdiction Financial
Institution; (iii) a participating FFI, a deemed-compliant FFI, or an
exempt beneficial owner, as those terms are defined in relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations; (iv) an Active NFFE; or (v) a Passive NFFE
none of the Controlling Persons of which is a U.S. citizen or resident,
then the account is not a U.S. Account, and no reporting is requiredwith respect to the account.
d)
If the Account Holder is a Nonparticipating Financial Institution(including a Japanese Financial Institution or other Partner Jurisdiction
Financial Institution treated by the IRS as a Nonparticipating Financial
Institution), then the account is not a U.S. Account, but payments to the
Account Holder must be reported consistent with the requirements ofan FFI Agreement.
VI.
Special Rules and Definitions. The following additional rules and definitions apply
in implementing the due diligence procedures described above:A.
Reliance on Self-Certifications and Documentary Evidence. A Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution may not rely on a self-certification or documentary
evidence if the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution knows or has reason to knowthat the self-certification or documentary evidence is incorrect or unreliable.
B.

Definitions. The following definitions apply for purposes of this Annex I.
1.
AML/KYC Procedures. “AML/KYC Procedures” means thecustomer due diligence procedures of a Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution pursuant to the anti-money laundering or similar requirements ofJapan to which such Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is subject.
2.
NFFE. An “NFFE” means any Non-U.S. Entity that is not an FFI as
defined in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations or is an Entity described in
13subparagraph B(4)(j) of this section, and also includes any Non-U.S. Entity thatis established in Japan or another Partner Jurisdiction and that is not a Financial
Institution.
3.
Passive NFFE. A “Passive NFFE” means any NFFE that is not (i) an
Active NFFE, or (ii) a withholding foreign partnership or withholding foreign
trust pursuant to relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations.
4.
Active NFFE. An “Active NFFE” means any NFFE that meets any of
the following criteria:a)Less than 50 percent of the NFFE’s gross income for thepreceding calendar year or other appropriate reporting period is passive
income and less than 50 percent of the assets held by the NFFE during
the preceding calendar year or other appropriate reporting period areassets that produce or are held for the production of passive income;b)
The stock of the NFFE is regularly traded on an establishedsecurities market or the NFFE is a Related Entity of an Entity the stockof which is traded on an established securities market;c)
The NFFE is organized in a U.S. Territory and all of the ownersof the payee are bona fide residents of that U.S. Territory;d)
The NFFE is a government (other than the U.S. government), a
political subdivision of such government (which, for the avoidance of
doubt, includes a state, province, county, or municipality), or a public
body performing a function of such government or a politicalsubdivision thereof, a government of a U.S. Territory, an internationalorganization, a non-U.S. central bank of issue, or an Entity wholly
owned by one or more of the foregoing;e)
Substantially all of the activities of the NFFE consist of holding(in whole or in part) the outstanding stock of, or providing financing
and services to, one or more subsidiaries that engage in trades orbusinesses other than the business of a Financial Institution, except thatan NFFE shall not qualify for this status if the NFFE functions (or holds
itself out) as an investment fund, such as a private equity fund, venture
capital fund, leveraged buyout fund, or any investment vehicle whose
purpose is to acquire or fund companies and then hold interests in thosecompanies as capital assets for investment purposes;f)
The NFFE is not yet operating a business and has no prior
operating history, but is investing capital into assets with the intent tooperate a business other than that of a Financial Institution, provided
that the NFFE shall not qualify for this exception after the date that is
24 months after the date of the initial organization of the NFFE;g)
The NFFE was not a Financial Institution in the past five years,
and is in the process of liquidating its assets or is reorganizing with the14intent to continue or recommence operations in a business other thanthat of a Financial Institution;h)
The NFFE primarily engages in financing and hedging
transactions with, or for, Related Entities that are not Financial
Institutions, and does not provide financing or hedging services to any
Entity that is not a Related Entity, provided that the group of any such
Related Entities is primarily engaged in a business other than that of a
Financial Institution;i)
The NFFE is an “excepted NFFE” as described in relevant U.S.
Treasury Regulations; orj)

The NFFE meets all of the following requirements:i.
It is established and operated in its jurisdiction ofresidence exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, artistic,
cultural, athletic, or educational purposes; or it is establishedand operated in its jurisdiction of residence and it is a
professional organization, business league, chamber ofcommerce, labor organization, agricultural or horticulturalorganization, civic league or an organization operated
exclusively for the promotion of social welfare;ii. It is exempt from income tax in its jurisdiction ofresidence;iii. It has no shareholders or members who have a proprietaryor beneficial interest in its income or assets;
iv. The applicable laws of the NFFE’s jurisdiction ofresidence or the NFFE’s formation documents do not permit
any income or assets of the NFFE to be distributed to, or
applied for the benefit of, a private person or non-charitable
Entity other than pursuant to the conduct of the NFFE’scharitable activities, or as payment of reasonable compensation
for services rendered, or as payment representing the fairmarket value of property which the NFFE has purchased; andv. The applicable laws of the NFFE’s jurisdiction ofresidence or the NFFE’s formation documents require that, upon
the NFFE’s liquidation or dissolution, all of its assets be
distributed to a governmental entity or other non-profit
organization, or escheat to the government of the NFFE’s
jurisdiction of residence or any political subdivision thereof.

C.

Account Balance Aggregation and Currency Translation Rules.
1.
Aggregation of Individual Accounts. For purposes of determining theaggregate balance or value of Financial Accounts held by an individual, a15

Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is required to aggregate all Financial
Accounts maintained by the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution, or by a
Related Entity, but only to the extent that the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution’s computerized systems link the Financial Accounts by reference toa data element such as client number or taxpayer identification number, andallow account balances or values to be aggregated. Each holder of a jointly
held Financial Account shall be attributed the entire balance or value of thejointly held Financial Account for purposes of applying the aggregation
requirements described in this paragraph 1.
2.
Aggregation of Entity Accounts. For purposes of determining theaggregate balance or value of Financial Accounts held by an Entity, aReporting Japanese Financial Institution is required to take into account all
Financial Accounts that are maintained by the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution, or by a Related Entity, but only to the extent that the Reporting
Japanese Financial Institution’s computerized systems link the Financial
Accounts by reference to a data element such as client number or taxpayer
identification number, and allow account balances or values to be aggregated.
3.
Special Aggregation Rule Applicable to Relationship Managers. For
purposes of determining the aggregate balance or value of Financial Accounts
held by a person to determine whether a Financial Account is a High Value
Account, a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is also required, in the caseof any Financial Accounts that a relationship manager knows, or has reason toknow, are directly or indirectly owned, controlled, or established (other than ina fiduciary capacity) by the same person, to aggregate all such accounts.
4.
Currency Translation Rule. For purposes of determining the balanceor value of Financial Accounts denominated in a currency other than the U.S.
dollar, a Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must convert the U.S. dollar
threshold amounts described in this Annex I into such currency using apublished spot rate determined as of the last day of the calendar year preceding
the year in which the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution is determining
the balance or value.
D.
Documentary Evidence. For purposes of this Annex I, acceptable
documentary evidence includes any of the following:
1.
A certificate of residence issued by an authorized government body (forexample, a government or agency thereof, or a municipality) of the jurisdictionin which the payee claims to be a resident.
2.
With respect to an individual, any valid identification issued by anauthorized government body (for example, a government or agency thereof, ora municipality), that includes the individual’s name and is typically used for
identification purposes.
3.
With respect to an Entity, any official documentation issued by anauthorized government body (for example, a government or agency thereof, ora municipality) that includes the name of the Entity and either the address of its
16

principal office in the jurisdiction (or U.S. Territory) in which it claims to be aresident or the jurisdiction (or U.S. Territory) in which the Entity wasincorporated or organized.
4.
With respect to a Financial Account maintained in a jurisdiction with
anti-money laundering rules that have been approved by the IRS in connection
with a QI agreement (as described in relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations), anyof the documents, other than a Form W-8 or W-9, referenced in thejurisdiction’s attachment to the QI agreement for identifying individuals or
Entities.
5.
Any financial statement, third-party credit report, bankruptcy filing, or
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission report.
E.
Alternative Procedures for Financial Accounts Held by Individual
Beneficiaries of a Cash Value Insurance Contract. A Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution may presume that an individual beneficiary (other than the owner) of a
Cash Value Insurance Contract receiving a death benefit is not a Specified U.S. Person
and may treat such Financial Account as other than a U.S. Account unless theReporting Japanese Financial Institution has actual knowledge, or reason to know, thatthe beneficiary is a Specified U.S. Person. A Reporting Japanese Financial Institution
has reason to know that a beneficiary of a Cash Value Insurance Contract is aSpecified U.S. Person if the information collected by the Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution and associated with the beneficiary contains U.S. indicia as described insubparagraph (B)(1) of section II of this Annex I. If a Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that the beneficiary is a Specified
U.S. Person, the Reporting Japanese Financial Institution must follow the proceduresin subparagraph B(3) of section II of this Annex I.
F.
Reliance on Third Parties. Regardless of whether an election is made underparagraph C of section I of this Annex I, Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions
may rely on due diligence procedures performed by third parties, to the extent
provided in an FFI Agreement and relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations.

17

ANNEX IINON-REPORTING JAPANESE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONSAND EXCLUDED ACCOUNTS
The following Entities are treated under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations as exempt
beneficial owners or deemed-compliant FFIs, as the case may be, and the following accounts
are excluded from the definition of Financial Accounts.
This Annex II may be modified by a mutual decision of the Competent Authorities of Japanand the United States: (1) to include additional Entities and accounts that present a low riskof being used by U.S. Persons to evade U.S. tax and that have similar characteristics to the
Entities and accounts described in this Annex II as of the date of commencement of theStatement; or (2) to remove Entities and accounts that, due to changes in circumstances, nolonger present a low risk of being used by U.S. Persons to evade U.S. tax. Procedures forreaching such a mutual decision may be included in the mutual agreement described inparagraph 3 of Section 4 of the Statement.
I. Exempt Beneficial Owners. The following categories of institutions are treated as NonReporting Japanese Financial Institutions and as exempt beneficial owners for purposes ofsections 1471 and 1472 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code:
A. Japanese Governmental Organizations
The Japanese Government, including local government, and any of its politicalsubdivisions, or any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of any one or moreof the foregoing.
B. Central Bank
Bank of Japan and any of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
C. International Organizations
Any Japan office of:
The International Monetary Fund
The World BankThe International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
The International Finance Corporation
The Asian Development Bank
The African Development Bank
D. Public Institutions
Public institutions which are established for public purpose under law, and whose
all bonds are issued indirectly (through other private securities companies)
Public Institutions for industrial development:
Regional Economy Vitalization Corporation of Japan
Innovation Network Corporation of Japan
1

The organization for restructuring businesses after the Tohoku earthquake
E. Pension Funds
Funds that meet the requirement of pension funds defined in the Article 3.1.(m) of
the Convention between the Government of Japan and the Government of theUnited States of America for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and thePrevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, signed on
November 6, 2003, at Washington, DC.
II. Deemed-Compliant Financial Institutions. The following categories of institutions are
Non-Reporting Japanese Financial Institutions that are treated as deemed-compliant FFIs forpurposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code:
A. Small Financial Institutions with Local Client Base. A Financial Institution
satisfying the following requirements is a Non-Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution treated as a registered deemed-compliant FFI for purposes of section
1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code:
1. The Financial Institution must be licensed and regulated as a financial
institution under the laws of Japan;
2. The Financial Institution must have no fixed place of business outside of Japan.
For this purpose, a fixed place of business does not include a location that is
not advertised to the public and from which the Financial Institution performs
solely administrative support functions;3. The Financial Institution must not solicit customers or Account Holders
outside Japan. For this purpose, a Financial Institution is not considered tohave solicited customers or Account Holders outside Japan merely because the
Financial Institution (a) operates a website, provided that the website does not
specifically indicate that the Financial Institution provides Financial Accounts
or services to nonresidents, and does not otherwise target or solicit U.S.
customers or Account Holders, or (b) advertises in print media or on a radio or
television station that is distributed or aired primarily within Japan but is also
incidentally distributed or aired in other countries, provided that theadvertisement does not specifically indicate that the Financial Institution
provides Financial Accounts or services to nonresidents, and does nototherwise target or solicit U.S. customers or Account Holders;
4. The Financial Institution must be required under the laws of Japan to identify
resident Account Holders for purposes of either information reporting or
withholding of tax with respect to Financial Accounts held by residents or for
purposes of satisfying Japan’s AML due diligence requirements;
5. At least 98 percent of the Financial Accounts by value maintained by the
Financial Institution as of the last day of the preceding calendar year must be
held by residents (including residents that are Entities) of Japan;2

6. Beginning on or before January 1, 2014, the Financial Institution must havepolicies and procedures, consistent with those described in Annex I, to prevent
the Financial Institution from providing a Financial Account to any
Nonparticipating Financial Institution and to monitor whether the Financial
Institution opens or maintains a Financial Account for any Specified U.S.
Person who is not a resident of Japan (including a U.S. Person that was a
resident of Japan when the Financial Account was opened but subsequently
ceases to be a resident of Japan) or any Passive NFFE with Controlling
Persons who are U.S. residents or U.S. citizens who are not residents of Japan;
7. Such policies and procedures must provide that if any Financial Account heldby a Specified U.S. Person who is not a resident of Japan or by a Passive
NFFE with Controlling Persons who are U.S. residents or U.S. citizens who
are not residents of Japan is identified, the Financial Institution must reportsuch Financial Account as would be required if the Financial Institution were aReporting Japanese Financial Institution or close such Financial Account;
8. With respect to a Preexisting Account held by an individual who is not aresident of Japan or by an Entity, the Financial Institution must review those
Preexisting Accounts in accordance with the procedures described in Annex I
applicable to Preexisting Accounts to identify any U.S. Account or Financial
Account held by a Nonparticipating Financial Institution, and must report such
Financial Account as would be required if the Financial Institution were aReporting Japanese Financial Institution or close such Financial Account;
9. Each Related Entity of the Financial Institution that is a Financial Institution
must be incorporated or organized in Japan and, with the exception of any
Related Entity that is a pension fund described in paragraph E of section I of
this Annex II, satisfy the requirements described in this paragraph A;
10. The Financial Institution must not have policies or practices that discriminate
against opening or maintaining Financial Accounts for individuals who are
Specified U.S. Persons and residents of Japan; and11. The Financial Institution must satisfy the requirements described in paragraph
D of section II of this Annex II.
B. Collective Investment Vehicle. An Investment Entity established in Japan that isregulated as a collective investment vehicle, provided that all of the interests in thecollective investment vehicle (including debt interests in excess of $50,000) are
held by or through one or more exempt beneficial owners, Active NFFEs
described in subparagraph B(4) of section VI of Annex I, U.S. Persons that are notSpecified U.S. Persons, or Financial Institutions that are not Nonparticipating
Financial Institutions, and the Investment Entity satisfies the requirements
described in paragraph D of section II of this Annex II. Such an Investment Entity
is a Non-Reporting Japanese Financial Institution treated as a registered deemedcompliant FFI for purposes of section 1471 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code.
C. Special Rules. Under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, the following rules
apply to an Investment Entity:31. With respect to interests in an Investment Entity that is a collective investment
vehicle described in paragraph B of this section, the reporting requirements
under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations of any Investment Entity (other thana Financial Institution through which interests in the collective investment
vehicle are held) would be deemed fulfilled.
2. With respect to interests in:a) An Investment Entity established in a Partner Jurisdiction that is regulated
as a collective investment vehicle, all of the interests in which (including
debt interests in excess of $50,000) are held by or through one or more
exempt beneficial owners, Active NFFEs described in subparagraph B(4)of section VI of Annex I, U.S. Persons that are not Specified U.S. Persons,or Financial Institutions that are not Nonparticipating Financial
Institutions; orb) An Investment Entity that is a qualified collective investment vehicle
under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations;the reporting requirements under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations of any
Investment Entity that is a Japanese Financial Institution (other than a
Financial Institution through which interests in the collective investment
vehicle are held) would be deemed fulfilled.
3. With respect to interests in an Investment Entity established in Japan that is
not described in paragraph B or subparagraph C(2) of this section, consistent
with paragraph 4 of Section 4 of the Statement, the reporting requirements
under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations of all other Investment Entities withrespect to such interests would be deemed fulfilled if the information to bereported by the first-mentioned Investment Entity pursuant to the Statementwith respect to such interests is reported by such Investment Entity or anotherperson.
4. An Investment Entity established in Japan that is regulated as a collective
investment vehicle would not fail to qualify under paragraph B or
subparagraph C(2) of this section, or otherwise as a deemed-compliant FFI,
solely because the collective investment vehicle has issued physical interests
in bearer form, provided that:a) The collective investment vehicle has not issued, and does not issue, any
physical shares in bearer form after December 31, 2012;b) The collective investment vehicle retires all such shares upon surrender;c) The collective investment vehicle (or a Reporting Japanese Financial
Institution) performs the due diligence procedures described in Annex I
and reports any information required to be reported with respect to any
such shares when such shares are presented for redemption or otherpayment; and4d) The collective investment vehicle has in place policies and procedures toensure that such shares are redeemed or immobilized as soon as possible,
and in any event prior to January 1, 2017.
D. Registration Requirements for a Financial Institution that Qualifies as a Registered
Deemed-Compliant FFI. Under relevant U.S. Treasury Regulations, a Financial
Institution that qualifies as a registered deemed-compliant FFI must satisfy thefollowing requirements:
1. Register with the IRS pursuant to procedures prescribed by the IRS andcomply with the terms of its registered deemed-compliant status;
2. Have its responsible officer certify every three years to the IRS, either
individually or collectively for such Financial Institution and its Related
Entities, that all of the requirements for the deemed-compliant category
claimed by the Financial Institution have been satisfied since January 1, 2014;
3. Maintain in its records the confirmation from the IRS of the Financial
Institution’s registration as a deemed-compliant FFI and the Financial
Institution’s Global Intermediary Identification Number or such otherinformation as the IRS specifies in forms or other guidance; and4. Notify the IRS if there is a change in circumstances that would make the
Financial Institution ineligible for the deemed-compliant status for which it
has registered, and to do so with six months of the change in circumstances
unless the Financial Institution is able to resume its eligibility for its registereddeemed-compliant status within the six-month notification period.
III. Exempt Accounts. The following categories of accounts established in Japan andmaintained by a Japanese Financial Institution are not treated as Financial Accounts, andtherefore are not U.S. Reportable Accounts or accounts held by a Nonparticipating Financial
Institution, under the Statement:
A. Employee Retirement Savings Accounts, Employee Housing Savings Accounts,
and Employee Savings Accounts, established under the Act for Promotion ofWorker's Property Accumulation;
B. Employee Benefit Savings Insurance, Employee Benefit Savings Trusts,
Employee Fund Savings Insurance, and Employee Fund Savings Trusts;
C. Employee or executive stock ownership plans established in Japan pursuant to
Article 1-3-3 (5) of the Order for Enforcement of Financial Instruments andExchange Law;
D. Stock ownership plans established for the benefit of significant business partners
established in Japan pursuant to Article 1-3-3 (6) of the Order for Enforcement of
Financial Instruments and Exchange Law;

5

E. Accounts or products under qualified employee or executive stock option plans
which conform to Article 29-2 or 29-3 of the Act on Special Measures concerning
Taxation of Japan;
F. Individual Savings Account (“ISA accounts”) as defined in Article 37-14(5)1 of
the Special Tax Measurement Law;
G. Employee Retirement Benefit Trusts;
H. Trusts which are legally required to be established for segregation of funds fromthe settlors’ own property for the purpose of keeping the funds for repayment incase of the settlors’ bankruptcy;
I. Employees’ Stock Ownership trusts;
J. Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trusts;
K. Specified Accounts Based on the Act on Transfer of Bonds, stocks, etc.;
L. Corporate pension insurance, Contributory group annuity insurance, Group
endowment insurance, Group whole life insurance.

6