SC/58/O8

Cruise report of the second phase of the Japanese Whale
Research Program under Special Permit in the Western North
Pacific (JARPN II) in 2005 – Offshore component –TAMURA, T.1) , OTANI, S.1), KIWADA, H.1), MORI, M.2), KONISHI, K.1), ISODA, T.1), WADA, A.1), OGIHARA, M.1),
HASEGAWA, A.1), KUMAGAI, S.1), KOMATSU, W.1), HAYASAKA, K.1), FUKUTOME, K.2), KASAI, H.1), KOYANAGI, T.1),
NAGAMINE, M.1), SIOZAKI, M.2), ZHARIKOV, K.A.3), NA, JONG-HUN.4), OGAWA T.2), WATANABE, H. 5), YONEZAKI, S. 5),
INAGAKE, D.5) AND KAWAHARA, S.5)
1) The Institute of Cetacean Research, 4-5, Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0055, Japan,2) Kyodo Senpaku Co. Ltd., 4-5, Toyomi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0055, Japan,
3) Marine Mammal Lab, VNIRO –Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries & Oceanography,17, V.
Krasnoselskaya, Moscow, 107140, RUSSIA,
4) Pukyong National University, Collage of Fisheries Science, Dept. Marine Production Management., 559-1, Daeyeon
3 dong Nam-gu Pusan, Korea.
5) National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, 5-7-1, Shizuoka, 424-8633, Japan.
Contact e-mail: tamura@cetacean.jp

ABSTRACTThe fourth cruise of the full-scale survey of the second phase of the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special
Permit in the Western North Pacific (JARPN II) -offshore component- was conducted from 16 May to 16 August 2005
in sub-areas 7, 8 and 9 of the western North Pacific. The objectives of the full-scale research are (a) feeding ecology andecosystem studies, (b) monitoring environmental pollutants in cetaceans and the marine ecosystem and (c) elucidationof stock structure. Target species are common minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata, Bryde’s whale B. edeni, sei
whale B. borealis and sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus. A total of six research vessels were used: one trawl survey
vessel equipped with scientific echo sounder (TSV), one dedicated sighting vessel (SV), three sighting/sampling vessels(SSVs) and one research base vessel. A total of 12.697.4 n.miles was surveyed in a period of 91 days. During that
period 114 common minke, 110 Bryde’s, 503 sei and 337 sperm whales were sighted by the SSVs. A total of 100
common minke, 100 sei, 50 Bryde’s and 5 sperm whales was sampled by the SSVs. The cooperative prey and whale
surveys were conducted with the participation of the six vessels in a part of sub-area 7 and 9 from 8 to 15 July, and from25 July to 4 August. All whales sampled were examined on board the research base vessel. Previous surveys in thisresearch area showed that common minke whales fed mainly on Pacific saury (Cololabis saira), minimal armhook
squid (Berryteuthis anonychus) and Japanese anchovy (Engraulis japonicus). During early seasons (May - June),
Japanese anchovy was the dominat as prey species. However, results of the present survey suggested that they fed
mainly on krill. Japanese anchovy was replaced by other prey species in this year. As in previous surveys, Bryde’s
whales fed mainly on Krill and Japanese anchovy. Sei whales fed mainly on copepods, krill and Pacific saury.
Dominant prey in the stomach of five sperm whales were various kinds of squids, which inhabit the mid- and deepwaters. The proportion of Japanese anchovy as a prey species for baleen whales was lower in this year than that inprevious years. Based on this, it seems that the availability of Japanese anchovy may have been lower than other years
due to changes in whale migration timing and/or decrease of the resource. It might be possible in the future that theJapanese anchovy will be replaced by other fishes as a major prey item.
KEYWORDS: COMMON MINKE WHALE; BRYDE’S WHALE; SEI WHALE; SPERM WHALE; NORTHPACIFIC OCEAN; DISTRIBUTION; FOOD/PREY; ECOSYSTEM; SCIENTIFIC PERMITS

1

BACKGROUND
After the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Western North Pacific (JARPN) from 1994 to
1999, the meeting to review the survey results and data availability was held on February 2000. In that meeting,participants agreed that no sub-stock scenario existed within the O stock (Government of Japan, 1994) for common
minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata in western North Pacific but the hypothesis of whether the W-stock exist(western part of sub-area 9) was not resolved. Regarding the feasibility studies on feeding ecology, the workshop
considered them as successful. The results showed that the main prey species of common minke whale changed
seasonally and geographically. As most of these prey species are also the target species of Japanese commercial
fisheries, possible competition between common minke whales and fisheries was postulated. The Workshop agreed that,
if ecological studies are to be conducted in the area, the sampling regime must be designed to allow for a morequantitative estimation of temporal and geographical variation in diet. It was also recommended that acoustic and trawl
surveys should be conducted concurrently with future whale surveys, if possible (IWC, 2001).
The second phase of Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the Western North Pacific (JARPNII)
was started in the 2000 summer season as a two-year feasibility study. One of the major objectives of this research is to
study the feeding ecology of whales and the marine ecosystem. During the previous JARPN surveys, it was revealed
that common minke whales consumed various commercial fish species such as Pacific saury Cololabis saira, Japanese
anchovy Engraulis japonicus. Japanese common squids Todarodes pacificus and walleye pollock Theragra
chalcogramma, and that they ate considerable amounts of these prey species. The second objective of the feasibility
survey of JARPNII is related to stock structure issues, and the third to pollution studies. Sampling of minke whale,
Bryde’s whale Balaenoptera edeni and sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus was conducted in the feasibility research
program.
Based on the success of the feasibility study (Government of Japan, 2002) and increasingly strong support frominternational fisheries organizations, including FAO, for research to improve multi-species approaches to management,
JARPN II, as a full-scale research program, started from 2002.The full-scale study aimed mainly i) to evaluate thefeeding ecology and ecosystem studies, ii) to monitor environmental pollutants in cetaceans and the marine ecosystem
and iii) to elucidate the stock structure (Government of Japan, 2002b).
The full-scale JARPN II plan involved two survey components: the ‘offshore’ survey was covered by the Nisshin Maru
research unit and the ‘coastal’ survey was covered by small type whaling catcher boats. The coastal component wasnecessary to cover the temporal and spatial gaps, which could not be covered by the Nisshin Maru unit (Government ofJapan, 2002b).
Sampling of 100 minke whale, 50 Bryde’s whale and 10 sperm whale as in the JARPN II feasibility study is continued
in the full research program with the addition of 50 sei whales Balaenoptera borealis in each year and 50 common
minke whales to be taken by small-type whaling catcher boats in 2002. Sei whale is selected as a target species as they
feed on fisheries resources such as common squid and the estimated biomass is larger than that of Bryde’s and common
minke whales. The additional 50 common minke whales provide full coverage of the spring and autumn seasons incoastal waters where the competition between cetaceans and fisheries is likely to be substantial. In the full JARPN II
plan the coastal survey component was presented as a two-year feasibility study to be conducted in 2002 and 2003. The
plan also noted that in the case of the sei whale, ‘the required sample size will be recalculated after the first two years
making use of the data accumulated’ (Government of Japan, 2002b).
In accordance with these provisions, a revised JARPN II research plan was presented for the period starting from 2004,
which takes into consideration i) the results of the coastal survey component (feasibility surveys in 2002 and 2003)
regarding logistic and sample size of the common minke whale and ii) the results of new calculations of required
sample size for the sei whale based on the data accumulated in those two years. The research area was set in sub-areas 7,
8 and 9, and the target species and sample sizes in 2005 were set as follows: 160 common minke whales Balaenoptera
acutorostrata (100 were to be sampled by the offshore survey and 60 - by the coastal survey); 100 sei whales B.
borealis (offshore survey), 50 Bryde’s whales B. edeni (offshore survey) and 10 sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus(offshore survey) (Government of Japan, 2004a, 2004b).
In this paper, we present an outline of the fourth full-scale survey of the JARPN II -offshore component-, which was
conducted from 16 May to 16 August 2005.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Research area
Sub-areas 7, 8 and 9, excluding the EEZ zones of foreign countries, constituted the research area (Fig. 1). Those subareas were further divided as follows:2

Sub-area 7:

Five small blocks (7N, 7MI, 7MO, 7SI, 7SO stratified for taking into account satellite information onwater temperature.

Sub-areas 8 and 9: Four small blocks were divided at latitude of 40ºN in each sub area (8N and 8S, 9N and 9S).
In the case of the cooperative survey, two special blocks were predetermined in the survey areas. Two special blocks(SBs) were set in the offshore area as shown in Fig. 4. We conducted the whale and prey surveys in the SBs
concurrently.
Research vessels
Six research vessels were used.
The research base vessel Nisshin Maru (NM: 7,659GT) commanded the research and was used for conducting thebiological examinations of whale samples and in the processing of by-products. The Yushin Maru (YS1: 720GT),
Yushin Maru No.2 (YS2: 747GT) and Kyo Maru No.1 (K01: 812.08GT) were used as the sighting/sampling vessels(SSVs), which conducted sighting activities, sampling of targeted whale species and various experiments andobservations. The Kyoshin Maru No. 2 (KS2: 372GT) was used as a dedicated sighting vessel (SV). The Shunyo Maru
(SYO: 887GT) was engaged in trawl surveys and echo sounder surveys. This vessel also conducted the mid-water trawl
net and MOCNESS net sampling. Furthermore, this vessel conducted the oceanographic observations using CTD.
Survey components
The survey was composed of three main components: whale survey, sighting survey and the cooperative survey.
Whale survey
Vessels: Four research vessels (NM, YS1, YS2 and K01)
Research area: Sub-areas 7, 8 and 9. In addition, a ‘special monitoring survey’ (SMS) was settled in some areas where
the number of common minke, Bryde’s and sei whales was expected to be abundant.
Research period (Table 1):
First period:

Between 16 May and 7 July.

Second period:

Between 15 and 24 July.

Third period:

Between 5 and 16 August.

Dedicated Sighting survey (Table 1)
Vessels: One research vessel (KS2)
Research area:

Sub-areas 7, 8 and 9

Research period:
Entire period:

Between 15 May and 24 August.

Cooperative survey on the prey species and whale sampling (Table 1)
Vessels: Five research vessels (NM, YS1, YS2, K01 and SYO)
Research area:

Two special blocks (A and B) were settled.

Reseach period:First period (A):

Between 8 and 15 July for the A (offshore-A block).

Second period (B): Between 25 July and 4 August for the B (offshore-B block).

Methods for setting cruise track line for the whale survey
Track lines and allocation of vessels were made as in previous JARPN and JARPN II surveys (Fujise et al., 1995, 1996,
1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003; Ishikawa et al., 1997; Zenitani et al., 1999; Tamura et al., 2004, 2005). The zigzagshaped track line was established on an arbitrary basis in each sub-area and month, taking into consideration previous
sighting information of target whales and sea conditions.
Furthermore, some ‘special monitoring surveys’ (SMS) were conducted in areas where the abundance of common
minke whales, Bryde’s and sei whales was expected to be high. Track line in the SMS was designed separately from theoriginal track line. Three SSVs were allocated to these tracks with the allocation being changed every day.

3

The SSVs surveyed in the following manner: the research course consisted of one main track and two parallel tracks
established in 7 n.miles apart from both sides. The track line of the prey survey vessel in the cooperative survey wasdetermined in the following manner. The zigzag-shaped track line was set independent of whale survey. If the SYO
detected the existence of the prey species by response of echo sounder, the SYO conducted the trawl survey and/or
MOCNESS survey for the target depth to identify these prey species, at the same time.
Apart from these sampling activities, an independent track line for dedicated sighting survey was determined in the
research area. The track lines were determined randomly.
Sighting surveys
Sighting procedure both for the whale survey and dedicated sighting survey was similar to the previous surveys of
JARPN and JARPN II (Fujise et al., 1995, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003; Ishikawa et al., 1997; Zenitani et al.,
1999; Tamura et al., 2004, 2005). In the research area sighting was conducted mainly under closing mode. Furthermore
two modalities of sighting in closing mode were adopted, NSC and NSS modes, by taking into consideration weather
and sea conditions mainly. The NSC and NSS modes were the same as BC and BS modes in the previous JARPN
surveys, respectively. The conditions to conduct surveys under NSC mode were similar to those established in Japanesesighting surveys conducted by the National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries (i.e. visibility of 2 n.miles or more
and wind force of 4 or below). The NSS mode was used under more bad weather conditions such as heavy rain and fog
but under this condition the collection of whale samples was possible. This NSS mode was used only by SSV vessels.
These two mode surveys were recorded separately for future analysis. Also an ASP mode was used (closing mode
survey without sampling activities under normal sighting conditions).
During the transit from homeport (HP) to research area (RA) and from RA to HP, the NSP mode was adopted (passing
mode without sampling activities under normal sighting conditions).
Closing was performed mainly on sightings of common minke, Bryde’s, sei and sperm whales. Furthermore closing was
made on sightings of large whales, such as blue, humpback, right and fin whales. In these cases, closing was done inorder to confirm species and school size and in order to conduct some experiments.
Sampling of common minke, Bryde’s, Sei and sperm whales
Most of the target whale species sighted on the trackline were approached for sampling. Furthermore sampling effort
was applied outside the established research hours (SSV: 06:00-19:00, SV: 06:00-18:00), if collection of whale samples
was considered as possible.
For schools consisting of two or more animals, numbering was made for all the whales in the school; to set samplingorder randomly in accordance with the table of random numbers (Kato et al., 1989). Cow and calf pairs were nottargeted for sampling.
Sampled whales were immediately transported to a research base vessel, where biological measurements and sampling
were carried out.
Prey species survey
Detailed report on this activity is shown in Appendix I.
A quantitative echo sounder (Simrad EK60 with program version 1.4.3.64) was used on board SYO to acquire acoustic
data with operating frequency at 38, 70 and 120 kHz. Those data were collected as the reference information for
qualitative analysis. Calibrations were carried out in Sendai Bay in July 25 using the copper sphere technique described
in EK 60 online help manual.
The mid-water trawl net was 86.3 m long with a mouth opening of ca. 900 m2 and a 6.0 m cod end with a 17.5 x 17.5mm mesh. Surface and mid-water trawl was towed at acoustic identified stations. Trawls were conducted for 0.5 hour toidentify the species compositions of biological backscattering detected by the quantitative echo sounder. Routine trawls
were conducted at predetermined stations in each block in daytime and nighttime. The purpose of the routine trawls wasto estimate the abundance and distribution patterns of cephalopods and neustonic organisms such as Pacific saury(Cololabis saira) that are difficult to detect by the echo sounder. Three different depth layers were sampled at routine
trawl stations; 0-30m (surface) 30-60m and 60-90m (mid-water). Nighttime routine trawls were conducted twice toexamine day-night difference of prey species composition. All samples were identified to the species as much as
possible and wet weight of each species was measured aboard the ship. For the major species, length and weight of 100
individuals were measured to examine their size composition. A part of samples were frozen at –30°C for further
analysis in the laboratory.
MOCNESS was used to collect zooplankton such as copepods and krill. This net with a mouth opening of ca. 1 m2
with a 0.33 x 0.33 mm mesh can take some samples in each depth layer and estimate the quantitative value. Eightdifferent depth layer were sampled at routine trawl stations; 0-20m, 20-40m, 40-60m, 60-80m, 80-100m, 100-150m,
150-200m and 200-250m.
4Experiments
The following experiments and observations were conducted on board the sighting/sampling vessels:

1. Sighting distance and angle experiments to examine the precision of sighting data (YS1, YS2 and K01).
2. Biopsy sampling on gray, blue, fin, sei, Bryde’s, minke, humpback, right, bowhead and sperm whales.
3. Photographic records of natural marks in blue, humpback and right whales.
4. Preliminary examination of attachment of data logger to Minke, sei and Bryde’s whales.
5. Feeding behaviour patterns of large whale species (blue, fin, sei, Bryde’s, common minke, humpback, right andsperm whales).
6. Oceanographic observations using EPCS (Electric particle counting and sizing system) (YS2).

On board the SV, the following experiments and observations were conducted:
1. Sighting distance and angle experiment to examine the precision of sighting data.
2. Biopsy sampling on gray, blue, fin, sei, Bryde’s, minke, humpback, right, bowhead and sperm whales.
3. Photographic records of natural marks in blue, humpback and right whales.
4. Feeding behaviour patterns of large whales.
5. Oceanographic observations using EPCS (Electric particle counting and sizing system).

On board the prey survey vessel (SYO), the following experiments were conducted:
1. Estimate abundance of prey species of common minke and other large whale species using an echo sounder system.
2. Oceanographic observations using CTD.

Observations of marine debris in the research area were conducted from the wheelhouse of the research base vessel(NM) (mainly during transit cruises). Marine debris was also investigated in the stomach contents of common minke,
Bryde’s, sei and sperm whales sampled. Experiments on killing method were conducted onboard of both the researchbase vessel and the SSVs.

RESULTS
Searching distance
Track line covered by the three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) is shown in Figs 2 and 3. The total searching distancefor SSVs was 12,697.4 n.miles (Table 2).
In the cooperative surveys on ecosystem research, the surveys were conducted from 8 to 15 July and from 25 July to 4
August, respectively. Under the cooperative survey, searching distance for SSVs were 490.4 n.miles and 1,081.5
n.miles, respectively (Fig. 4, Table 2).
Track line covered by the dedicated sighting vessel (SV) is shown in Fig 5. The total searching distance was 5,078.7
n.miles (Table 2).
Sightings of common minke, Bryde’s, sei and sperm whales
Sighting and sampling vessels (SSVs)
A total of 113 schools (114 individuals) of common minke whales were sighted, consisting of 73 schools (73individuals) of primary and 40 schools (41 individuals) of secondary sightings. For sei whale, 311 schools (503
individuals) were sighted, consisting of 208 schools (339 individuals) of primary sightings and 103 schools (164
individuals) of secondary sightings. For Bryde’s whale, 83 schools (110 individuals) were sighted, consisting of 57
schools (78 individuals) of primary sightings and 26 schools (32 individuals) of secondary sightings. For sperm whale,
186 schools (337 individuals) were observed, consisting of 151 schools (225 individuals) of primary sightings and 35
schools (112 individuals) of secondary sightings (Table 3).

5Fig 6 shows the distribution of common minke whales sighted by the SSVs in the sub-areas 7, 8 and 9. Figs.7 and 8
show the distribution of Bryde’s and sei whales. Common minke whales were sighted in northern part of sub area 7,
entire part of sub-areas 8 and 9. But, Bryde’s whales were sighted mainly in southern part of sub-areas 7, 8 and 9. Sei
whales were sighted mainly in offshore of sub-areas 8 and 9. In the sub-areas 8 and 9, some segregation was observed
between sei and Bryde’s whales. Fig. 9 shows the distribution of sperm whale sightings in sub-areas 8 and 9. Spermwhales were widely distributed in sub-areas 7, 8 and 9.
Dedicated sighting vessel (SV)During the research cruise, 20 schools (21 individuals) of common minke whales were sighted, consisting of 14 schools(15 individuals) of primary sightings and 6 schools (6 individuals) of secondary sightings. For sei whale, 181 schools(360 individuals) were sighted, consisting of 177 schools (339 individuals) of primary sightings and 4 schools (21individuals) of secondary sightings. For Bryde’s whale, 12 schools (15 individuals) were sighted, consisting of 12
schools (15 individuals) of primary sightings. For sperm whale, 79 schools (210 individuals) were sighted, consisting of
68 schools (198 individuals) of primary sightings and 11 schools (12 individuals) of secondary sightings (Fig. 14, Table
4).
Sightings of other large cetacean species
Sighting and sampling vessels (SSVs)
Table 3 also shows the number of sightings for other large whale species made by the SSVs, including large baleen
whales such as blue (24 schs./28 inds.), fin (90 schs./136 inds.), humpback whales (32 schs./47 inds.) and right whale(1 sch./2 inds.) (Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13).
Dedicated sighting vessel (SV)
Large baleen whales such as blue (15 schs. /18 inds.), fin (32 schs. /60 inds.) and humpback whales (19 schs. /43 inds.)
were found in the sub-areas 7, 8 and 9 (Figs. 15 and 16, Table 4).
Sampling of common minke, Bryde’s, sei and sperm whales
This survey covered spatial and temporal gaps for studies on feeding ecology and stock structure. Table 5 shows thenumber of whales sampled in each sub-area or special block for each research component and period. A total of 100
common minke whales (Male: 86 individuals, Female: 14 individuals) were sampled, 85 during the whale survey
component and 15 during the cooperative survey component. A total of 100 sei whales (Male: 51 individuals, Female:
49 individuals) were sampled, 78 during the whale survey component and 22 during the cooperative survey component.
A total of 50 Bryde’s whales (Male: 21 individuals, Female: 29 individuals) were sampled, 14 during the whale survey
component and 36 during the cooperative survey component. A total of three male and two female sperm whales were
sampled during the whale survey component.
Geographical distribution of common minke, Bryde’s and sei whale samples are also shown in Figs 6 - 8 based on thesighting positions. Fig. 7 shows the distribution of sperm whale samples based on the sighting positions. One minke
whale was struck but lost due to technical failure.
Biological research for common minke, Bryde’s and sei whales
Table 6 summarizes the biological data and samples collected from whale sampled such as the common minke, Bryde’s,
sei and sperm whales sampled. A total of 55 research items were covered. These items are related to the studies
conducted under the three main objectives of the JARPN II: study on feeding ecology of whales and marine ecosystem,
pollution studies and elucidation of stock structure.
Composition of sex and sexual maturity of common minke, Bryde’s, and sei whales is shown in Tables 7, 8 and 9. The
rate of mature males in common minke was higher than in Bryde’s and sei whales.
Preliminary analyses of biological data and experiments
Body length of sampled whales
The statistics of body length of common minke whales are shown in Table 10. Mean body length of common minke
whales is 7.23 m and 6.79 m for males and females, respectively. For Bryde’s whales, the statistics of body length are
shown in Table 11. Mean body length of Bryde’s whales is 11.44 m and 11.93 m for males and females, respectively.
For sei whales, the statistics of body length are shown in Table 12. Mean body length of sei whales is 13.53 m and14.06 m for males and females, respectively. For sperm whale, the statistics of body length are shown in Table 13.
Mean body length of sperm whales is 10.12 m and 9.09 m for males and females, respectively.

6

Distribution and food habit
During research season (from May to August) in the offshore area, common minke whales fed mainly on Pacific saury.
They also fed on krill, Japanese anchovy, and minimal armhook squid. On the other hand, the common minke whales
fed mainly on Japanese anchovy and walleye pollock in coastal area. The geographical changes of the prey species of
the common minke whales seem to reflect changes in the distribution of prey species in feeding areas. The common
minke whales seem to be opportunistic feeders with a broad diet and with flexible feeding habits in the research area
(Table 13). Bryde’s whales were distributed in the southern part of research area during research periods. They fed
mainly on krill and Japanese anchovy (Table 13). Sei whales were distributed widely in the research area. From May toAugust, they fed mainly on copepods and krill in the research area. The sei whales seem to be opportunistic feeders
with a broad diet and with flexible feeding habits in the research area. There are geographical and seasonal changes of
their prey species (Table 13). Sperm whales were distributed widely in the research area. They fed mainly on deep sea
squids in offshore area (sub area 7, 8 and 9).
In this research, there were differences of prey species among three baleen whale species. Especially, in May and June,
common minke whale usually fed mainly on Japanese anchovy. However, they fed mainly on zooplanktons such as krill
and copepods in this year. Sei whales did not feed on Japanese anchovy during this research season. Bryde’s whale fed
on krill and Japanese anchovy, the proportion of Japanese anchovy was lower than that in other research years (Figs.
17-a, b, c).
The length composition of Japanese anchovy and Pacific saury in the stomach of each whale
Japanese anchovy
Even though, three whale species fed on Japanese anchovy, the sizes of the fish were different. The body length ofJapanese anchovy in the stomachs of common minke whale, Bryde’s whale, sei whale, were from 68 to 137 mm, from29 to 146 mm, and from 37 to 50 mm, respectively (Fig. 18).
Pacific saury
Common minke whale and sei whale fed on Pacific saury, and the sizes of the fish were different. The body length ofPacific saury in the stomachs of common minke whale and sei whale, were from 219 to 336 mm, and from 100 to 345
mm, respectively (Fig. 19).
Condition of concurrent survey
In this season, the cooperative surveys were conducted in two survey blocks. The survey areas were set in the offshore
areas (Fig. 1). During the survey period, a total of 22 sei whale samples, 36 Bryde’s whales and 15 common minke
whales were collected by the SSVs. Information on the prey species distribution was also collected by SYO during
these periods (See Appendix 1).
Experiments, prey surveys and oceanographic surveys
Biopsy sampling trial
Table 14 shows the results of biopsy skin sampling for right whales. A total of 2 right whales were targeted for biopsy
sampling by the SVs and SSVs. As a result, two right whale’s biopsy skin samples were collected.
Natural marks (photo ID) for blue, humpback and right whales
Table 15 shows the result of the photo-ID experiments on right whales. A total of two right whales were targeted by the
SVs and SSVs. These trials were conducted for right whales.
Feeding behaviour for large baleen whales
The SV and SSVs had a plan to conduct recording of the feeding behaviour of large baleen whales using a video
recorder. However, we did not have a chance to record the feeding behaviour of large baleen whales in this year.
Prey species survey
Echo sounder survey was conducted on SYO and they operated to cover the planned track lines. Surface routine trawls
were towed at 28 stations. MOCNESS was towed at 10 stations. The details of the prey species survey conducted by
SYO are described in Appendix 1.
CTD
CTD casts were made at 59 stations by KS2. CTD (Model SBE 19) casts were conducted down to 500m at each station
to collect the temperature and salinity profiles in the study area by KS2. CTD casts were made at some stations by SYO.
In the SYO, CTD (Model SBE 9, Seabird Co.) casts were conducted down to 500m at each sampling station to measure
the temperature and salinity profiles in the study area by SYO. The details of the oceanographic observations arereported in Appendix 2 of this document.
7

By-products of whales
After biological measurements and sampling were completed, all the whales were processed according to Article VIII
of The International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. Total production including red meat and blubber from100 sampled common minke, 100 sei, 50 Bryde’s and 5 sperm whales was 265 tons, 1,259 tons, 367 tons and 14 tons,
respectively.
Participation by foreign scientists
In 2005 JARPNII, two foreign scientists participated. They joined our sighting and sampling survey on board. It is
expected that these international collaboration will continue in future.

DISCUSSIONSThis forth JARPN II was completed satisfactorily. New samples and data ware collected to allow advances in the main
objectives of JARPN II, some of samples and data were collected from areas and months not covered in previous
surveys.
The distributions and food habits of whales targeted
Minke whale
Common minke whales were sighted in the northern part of sub area 7 and the entire part of sub-areas 8 and 9. They
were not found in the centre and southern parts of sub area 7, because our research activity was conducted after lateJune. It was confirmed that they migrated into higher latitude waters during the summer season. Regarding to seasonal
movement, Hatanaka and Miyashita (1997) conducted the examination of movement of common minke whales in thewestern North Pacific. They summarized the pattern of seasonal movement of the O stock as follows: i) immature males
migrate into the coastal area of sub area 7 south in April and then disperse to sub area 7 north and the southern Okhotsk
Sea from June, ii) immature females follow a similar pattern of immature males, iii) mature males found throughout
coastal and offshore waters during May to September, iv) mature females are found in the Okhotsk Sea in May, after
which they move further north to the middle and northern Okhotsk Sea. In this research, the proportion of mature
females was only 6.0% (6 individuals). This fact is an indirect confirmation of the hypothesis that in summer season
almost all females are feeding in the Okhotsk Sea. In resent years, during early seasons (May - June), Japanese anchovy
was the dominat prey species (Tamura and Fujise, 2002). However, they fed mainly on krill this year. It seems likelythat the Japanese anchovy will be replaced by other prey in this year. During late season (July – August), Pacific saury
was the dominat prey species (Tamura and Fujise, 2002). This is consistent with the results of previous years. We
confirmed that Pacific saury was the most important prey species for common minke whales in the research area.

Bryde’s whale
Bryde’s whales were sighted mainly in the southern part of sub-areas 7, 8 and 9. It was confirmed that they were
distributed in lower latitude waters in the research area during the summer season. Regarding seasonal movement, someresearchers conducted the examination of movement of Bryde’s whales in the western North Pacific. Omura andNemoto (1959) reported that Bryde’s whales were distributed south of 40 oN within higher surface water temperatures(over 20 oC). Nemoto (1959) stated that they migrated in the areas of the higher surface water temperature of 18 oC or
more degrees. Water temperature of 20 oC was their distribution boundary in the offshore. In this research, it was
confirmed that their distribution area was south of 40 oN, and our research seems to investigate habitat of the northern
limit of their distribution. In previous years, during early seasons (May - June), krill was the dominat prey species. And,during late season (July – August), Japanese anchovy was the dominat prey species (Tamura and Fujise, 2002).
However, the proportion of Japanese anchovy was lower than the previous years. It seems that the abundance ofJapanese anchovy was lower than other years due to change of their migration timing and/or decrease of their resources.

Sei whale
Sei whales were sighted mainly in the southern part of sub-areas 8 and 9. It was confirmed that they were distributed
into middle and higher latitude waters in the research area during the summer season. Our research seems to investigate
habitat of the southern limit of their distribution. Sighting north of 45 oN were few, because we could not conduct the
research activity due to bad weather such as high density fog. In resent years, during all seasons (May - September),
Copepods and Japanese anchovy were the dominat prey species. And, during late season (July – August), Japanese
anchovy was the dominat prey species (Tamura and Fujise, 2002). However, the proportion of Japanese anchovy was8lower than the previous years. It seems that the abundance of Japanese anchovy was lower than other years due tochange of their migration timing and/or decrease of their resources.

The length composition of Japanese anchovy and Pacific saury in the stomach of each whale
Japanese anchovy
The common minke whales fed mainly on mature Japanese anchovy, on the other hand, Bryde’s whales and sei whales
fed mainly on pre-mature Japanese anchovy. This size difference probably reflects the distribution of Japanese anchovyin the area (Murase et al, 2002). It seems that there is size selectivity of prey among whales. This data may be useful fordevelopment of ecosystem models for the western North Pacific.
Pacific saury
Prey size differences probably reflects the distribution of Pacific saury in the area. It seems that there is size selectivityof prey between common minke whales and sei whales. Our results will useful in assessing their feeding impact on
Pacific saury resources and the level of inter-specific competition among other baleen whales. The data will also be
useful for developing ecosystem models for the western North Pacific. This size differences probably reflects the
distribution of Pacific saury in the area. It seems that there is size selectivity of prey between common minke whales
and sei whales.
The importance of the research for ecosystem modelling
In this research, there was difference of prey species among three baleen whale species. Especially, the proportion ofJapanese anchovy as the prey for baleen whales was lower than that in previous years. It is well known that the mostabundant species were replaced successively starting with the Japanese sardine, Pacific saury and Japanese anchovy,chub mackerel and Japanese sardine again in periods of 10 to 20 years in Japanese waters (Yatsu et al. 2001). In recent
years, Japanese anchovy was dominat. Japanese anchovy will be replaced by other fishes in the future. There is a needto monitor the resource of prey species and the food habit of whales. Our results will used to build ecosystem models.

Response to the discussion in the IWC/SC meeting
The revised JARPN II research plan was presented in the 56th IWC/SC annual meeting (Government of Japan, 2004a).
Although, discussions were made at those meetings, there remained divided views in the Committee members (IWC,
2005, 2006). Thus, the 2005 surveys were conducted following the original plan and almost same methodology in the2004 revised JARPN II research plan.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are greatly indebted to Mr. Joji Morishita and Hideki Moronuki, the Fisheries Agency of Japan, Dr.
Hidehiro Kato, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, and Dr. Hiroshi Hatanaka, Dr. Seiji Ohsumi, Dr.
Yoshihiro Fujise, Dr. L.A. Pasutene, and Mr. Shigetoshi Nishiwaki, The Institute of Cetacean Research (ICR) for theirguidance in the design and implementation of the research. We thank all crew of the research vessels (NM, YS1, YS2,
K01, KS2 and SYO) and the staff of the ICR, NRIFSF, and Kyodo-Senpaku Co. Ltd. The present research project(JARPN II) was funded under the subsidy of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Government of Japan.

REFERENCES
Fujise, Y., Kishiro, T., Zenitani, R., Matsuoka, K., Kawasaki, M. and Shimamoto, K. 1995. Cruise report of the Japanese whale research program
under a special permit for North Pacific minke whales in 1994. Paper SC/47/NP3 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 1995
(unpublished). 29pp.
Fujise, Y., Iwasaki, T., Zenitani, R., Araki, J., Matsuoka, K., Tamura, T., Aono, S., Yoshida, T., Hidaka, H., Nibe, T. and Tohyama, D. 1996. Cruise
report of the Japanese whale research program under a special permit for North Pacific minke whales in 1995 with the results of a preliminary
analysis of data collected. Paper SC/48/Np13 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 1996 (unpublished). 39pp.
Fujise, Y., Shimada, H., Zenitani, R., Goto, M., Tamura, T., Lindstrøm, U., Uchida, A., Yoshida, H., Shimamoto, K., Yuzu, S., Kasai, H., Kinoshita,T., Iwata, T. and Tohyama, D. 1997. Cruise report of the Japanese Whale Research Program under a Special Permit in the North Pacific (JARPN) in
1996 with some preliminary analysis of data collected during the 1994-1996 JARPN surveys. Paper SC/49/NP8 presented to the IWC ScientificCommittee, September 1997 (unpublished). 38pp.

9

Fujise, Y., Zenitani, R., Tamura, T., Bando, T., Ohtani, S., Takeda, S., Kitajima, A., Kimura, T., Masaki, T. and Tohyama, D. 2000. Cruise report of
the Japanese whale research program under special permit in the North Pacific (JARPN) in 1999. Paper SC/F2K/J9 presented to the JARPN review
meeting, February 2000 (unpublished). 32pp.
Fujise, Y., Pastene, L.A, Tamura, T., Bando, T., Murase, H., Kawahara, S., Watanabe, H., Ohizumi, H., Mogoe, T., Kiwada, H., Nemoto, K. andNarita, H. 2001. Progress Report of the Feasibility study of the Japanese whale research program under special permit in the western North PacificPhase II (JARPN II) in 2000. Paper SC/53/O10 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, July 2001 (unpublished). 77pp.
Fujise, Y., Tamura, T., Bando, T., Hikaru Watanabe, Hiroshi Kiwada, Otani, S., Kanda, N., Yasunaga, G., Mogoe, T., Konishi, K., Inamori, M.,
Shigemune, H. and Tohyama, D. 2002. Cruise report of the feasibility study of the Japanese whale research program under special permit in thewestern North Pacific – Phase II (JARPNII) in 2001. Paper SC/54/O16 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2002 (unpublished). 51pp.
Fujise, Y., Tamura, T., Bando, T., Yasunaga, G., Konishi, K., Murase, H., Yoshida, T., Itoh, S. Ogawa, R., Oka, T., Sasaki, T., Fukutome, K., Isoda,T., Birukawa, N., Horii, N., Zharikov, K.A., Park, K.J., Tohyama, D. and Kawahara, S. 2003. Cruise report of the Japanese whale research program
under special permit in the western North Pacific – Phase II (JARPNII) in 2002 (Part I). Paper SC/55/O7 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee,
May 2003 (unpublished). 41pp.
Government of Japan. 2000. Research Plan for Cetacean Studies in the Western North Pacific under Special Permit (JARPN II) (Feasibility Study
Plan for 2000 and 2001). Paper SC/52/01 presented to the IWC Scientific meeting, 68pp.
Government of Japan. 2002a. Report of the 2000 and 2001 feasibility study of the Japanese whale research program under special permit in thewestern North Pacific-phase II (JARPN II). Paper SC/54/O17 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2002 (unpublished). 202pp.
Government of Japan. 2002b. Research Plan for Cetacean Studies in the Western North Pacific under Special Permit (JARPN II) Paper SC/54/O2
presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2002 (unpublished). 115pp.
Government of Japan. 2004a. Revised research plan for cetacean studies in the western North Pacific under special permit (JARPN II). Paper
SC/56/O1 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 2004 (unpublished). 14pp.
Government of Japan. 2004b. Some considerations of the feasibility components of the JARPN II research plan. Paper SC/56/O2 presented to the
IWC Scientific Committee, May 2004 (unpublished). 36pp
Ishikawa, H., Yuzu, S., Shimamoto, K., Bando, T., Ohshima, K., Kasai, H., Kinoshita, T., Mizushima, Y., Iwakami, H., Nibe, T., Hosoyama, T.,
Kuramochi, T., Numano, K. and Miyamoto, M. 1997. Cruise report of the Japanese Whale Research Program under a Special Permit in the North
Pacific (JARPN) in 1997. Paper SC/49/NP9 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, September 1997 (unpublished). 28pp.
Kato, H., Hiroyama, H., Fujise, Y. and Ono, K. 1989. Preliminary report of the 1987/88 Japanese feasibility study of the special permit proposal forSouthern Hemisphere minke whales. Report of the International Whaling Commission, 39: 235-248.
Nemoto, T. 1959. Food of baleen whales with reference to whale movements. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst., Tokyo, 14: 149-291.
Tamura, T. and Fujise, Y. 2002. Appendix 1. Food habit of common minke whales based on JARPN II., pp 47-63. In: Government of Japan (Fujise,Y., Kawahara, S., Pastene, L.A. and Hatanaka, H. eds.), Report of 2000 and 2001 feasibility study of the Japanese Whale Research Program underSpecial Permit in the western North Pacific-Phase II (JARPN II). Paper SC/54/O17 submitted to the 54th IWC Scientific Committee Meeting.
Tamura, T. and Fujise, Y. 2002. Appendix 2. Food habit of Bryde’s whales based on JARPN II., pp 64-74. In: Government of Japan (Fujise, Y.,
Kawahara, S., Pastene, L.A. and Hatanaka, H. eds.), Report of 2000 and 2001 feasibility study of the Japanese Whale Research Program underSpecial Permit in the western North Pacific-Phase II (JARPN II). Paper SC/54/O17 submitted to the 54th IWC Scientific Committee Meeting.
Tamura, T., Fujise, Y., Bando, T., Yasunaga, G., Konishi, K., Kiwada, H., Isoda, T., Itoh, S. Machida, S., Tsunekawa, M., Konagai, T., Takamatsu, T.,
Ohshima, T., Honjo, K., Matsuoka, T., Zharikov, K.A., Yong, Rock AN, Tohyama, D. and Kawahara, S. 2004. Cruise Report of the Japanese Whale
Research Program under Special Permit in the western North Pacific -Phase II (JARPN II) in 2003 (part I) - Offshore component –. Paper
SC/56/O13 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 2004 (unpublished). 46pp.
Tamura, T., Fujise, Y., Mogoe, T., Kanda, N., Yasunaga, G., Konishi, K., Kiwada, H., Ogihara, M., Hasegawa, A., Kitajima, M, Sugiyama, T., Sasaki,T., Mori, M., Teraoka, T., Tsunekawa, M., Fukutome, K., Zharikov, K.A, NA, Jong-Hun., Tohyama, D, Inagake, D. and Kawahara, S. 2005. Cruise
Report of the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the western North Pacific -Phase II (JARPN II) in 2004 (part I) - Offshore
component –. Paper SC/57/O3 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, June 2005 (unpublished). 33pp.
Yatsu, A., Nishida, H., Tomosada, A., Kinoshita, T. and Wada, T. 2001. Trajectories of catch and stock abundance of dominant small pelagic fishes
and common squid with some related environmental indices around Japan. PICES Sci. Rep. 18: 175-8.
Zenitani, R., Fujise, Y., Matsuoka, K., Tamura, T., Bando, T., Ichihashi, H., Shimokawa, T., Krasnenko, A.S., Taguchi F., Kinoshita, T., Mori, M.,
Watanabe, M., Ichinomiya, D., Nakamura, M., Sakai, K., Matsuzaka, K., Kamei, H. and Tohyama, D. 1999. Cruise report of the Japanese Whale
Research Program under a Special Permit in the North Pacific in 1998. Paper SC/51/RMP7 presented to the IWC Scientific Committee, May 1999
(unpublished). 20pp

10

Table 1. Outline of 2005 JARPN II survey
・ Whale sampling survey
Subarea
9

Research
periods
May 16-17

Whale survey (First period)

7, 8, 9
8
9
8
9
8
7

May 18-July 7
May 18-24
24-MayMay 25-26
May 27-June 19
June 20-24
June 25-July 7

51
6.5
0.5
2
24
5
13

NM, YS1, YS2 and K01

Cooperative survey (SB-A)

7

July 8-15

7.5

NM, YS1, YS2, K01 and SHU

Whale survey (Second period)

7, 8, 97
8, 9July 15-24
July 15-16
July 17-24

9.5
1.5
8

NM, YS1, YS2 and K01

Cooperative survey (SB-B)

8, 9

July 25-August 4

11

NM, YS1, YS2, K01 and SHU

Whale survey (Third period)

9

August 5-16

12

NM, YS1, YS2 and K01

7, 8, 9May 16-August 16

91

NM, YS1, YS2, K01 and SHU

Research
periods
May 15-August 24

Days

Remarks

Research
Sighting survey

Total

Days Research ships and remark( 2 ) YS2

・ Sighting survey by Kyoshin Maru No.2
Research
Dedicated sighting survey

Subarea
7, 8, 9113

Research base ship: Nisshin Maru (NM)
Sighting and Sampling vessels (SSVs) : Yushin Maru (YS1), Yushin Maru No.2 (YS2) and Kyo Maru No.1 (K01)
Sighting vessel (SV) : Kyoshin Maru No.2 (KS2)Prey species survey vessel : Shunyo Maru (SHU)

11

Table 2. Searching distances made by the three sighting/sampling vessels (YS2, YS1 and K01)
and sighting vessels (KS2) in the 2005 JARPN II
SSVs
Sub-area

PeriodSearching distance (n.miles）
ASP
NSS
Combined173.3 1,894.1
7,801.6
110.6
0.0
110.6
0.0
569.0
1,718.5
0.0
0.0
34.6
0.0
0.0
82.9
59.1
599.7
3,335.8
0.0
351.4
547.4
3.6
374.0
1,971.8

Whale survey (First period)

7, 8, 9
9
8
9
8
9
8
7

May 16-July 7
16-MayMay 18-24
24-MayMay 25-26
May 27-June 19
June 20-24
June 25-July 7NSC
5,734.2
0.0
1,149.5
34.6
82.9
2,677.0
196.0
1,594.2

Cooperative survey (SB-A)

7

July 8-15

318.6

0.0

171.8

490.4

Whale survey (Second period)

7, 8, 97
8, 9July 15-24
July 15-16
July 17-24

829.5
221.0
608.5

0.0
0.0
0.0

624.6
61.1
563.5

1,454.1
282.1
1,172.0

Cooperative survey (SB-B)

9

July 25-August 4

714.9

0.0

366.6

1,081.5

Whale survey (Third period)

9

August 5-16

845.5

170.8

853.5

1,869.8

7, 8, 9May 18-August 16

8,442.7344.1

3,910.6

12,697.4

Sub-area

Period

7,8,9

May 15-Aug. 24

Total

SV (KS2)

Dedicated sighting survey

Transit

Searching distance (n.miles）
ASP
4,974.9
103.8

Combined

May 15-Aug. 24

12

5,078.7

13

47

15

15

Fin whale

Blue whale

Humpback whale

0118

Sperm whale

Right whale

45

139

1

Bryde's whale

Sei whale

Like minke whale

0

22

18

70

175

62

227

1

0

2

6

20

24

16

63

1

0

3

7

27

50

20

101

1

25

Common minke whale

24

55

Cetacean species

55

NSC
Primary
SecondarySch. Ind.
Sch. Ind.

1

5

1

11

25

12

69

3

16

2

7

1

14

42

16

112

3

16

0

3

2

10

10

8

29

3

11

0

4

2

21

32

10

48

3

11

NSS
Primary
SecondarySch. Ind. Sch. Ind.

0

5

0

0

8

0

0

1

2

0

6

0

0

8

0

0

1

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ASP
Primary
SecondarySch. Ind. Sch. Ind.

0

2

0

2

1

2

11

2

5

0

5

0

4

30

2

15

2

5

OE
SecondarySch. Ind.

1

25

16

58

151

57

208

5

73

2

35

19

84

225

78

339

5

73

PrimarySch. Ind.

0

7

8

32

35

26

103

6

40

0

12

9

52

112

32

164

6

41

Total
SecondarySch. Ind.

1

32

24

90

186

83

311

11

113

2

47

28

136

337

110

503

11

114

Total
Sch. Ind.

Table 3. List of cetacean species and number of sightings (no. schools/no. individuals) were made by three sighting/sampling vessels and research basein the 2005 JARPN II (Total area: May 15 - August 16).

Table 4. List of cetacean species and number of sightings (no. schools/no. individuals) was
made by dedicated sighting vessel (KS2) in the 2005 JARPN II.

Cetacean species
Common minke whale

ASP
Primary
SecondarySch. Ind.
Sch. Ind.
14
15
0
0

OE
SecondarySch. Ind.
6
6

PrimarySch. Ind.
14
15

Total
SecondarySch. Ind.
6
6

Total
Sch. Ind.
20
21

Like Common minke whale

2

2

0

0

0

0

2

2

0

0

2

2

Blue whale

13

16

1

1

1

1

13

16

2

2

15

18

Fin whale

31

58

0

0

1

2

31

58

1

2

32

60

Sei whale

177

339

3

19

1

2

177

339

4

21

181

360

Bryde's whale

12

15

0

0

0

0

12

15

0

0

12

15

Humpback whale

15

34

3

8

1

1

15

34

4

9

19

43

Sperm whale

68

198

6

7

5

5

68

198

11

12

79

210

Unidentified large cetacean

10

11

21

31

1

1

10

11

22

32

32

43

Unidentified cetacean

29

29

0

0

0

0

29

29

0

0

29

29

14

Table 5. Summary of whale sampling in the 2005 JARPN II survey
Research type7, 8, 98
98
77, 8, 9
8
9
8
9
8
7

Research
periods
May 18-July 7
May 18-24
24-MayMay 25-26
May 27-June 19
June 20-24
June 25-July 7

Cooperative survey (SB-A)

7

7

Whale survey (Second period)

7, 8, 97
8, 9

Cooperative survey (SB-B)
Whale survey (Third period)

Whale survey (First period)

Total

Sub-area Sub-area

Common minke

55
7

Whale samples
Sei
Bryde's
61
14
6
0

Sperm
5
0

0
3

0
6

0
0

0
0

13
0
32

46
3
0

3
8
3

2
2
1

July 8-15

0

0

36

0

7, 8, 97
8, 9July 16-24
16-JulJuly 17-24

4
0
4

16
0
16

0
0
0

0
0
0

8, 9

8, 9

July 25-August 4

15

22

0

0

9

9

August 5-16

26

1

0

0

7, 8, 97, 8, 9May 18-August 16

100

100

50

5

15

Table 6. Summary of whale sampling in the 2005 JARPN II survey

Common minke

Sei whale

Bryde's whale

Sperm whale

M F T
86 14 100
Body length and sex
86 14 100External body proportion
86 14 100
Photographic record and external character
86 14 100
Diatom film record and sampling
86 14 100
Standard measurements of blubber thickness (five points)
20 6 26
Detailed measurements of blubber thickness (eleven points)
86 14 100
Body weight
20 6 26
Body weight by parts
86 14 100
Blubber tissues for DNA study
Blubber, muscle, liver and kidney tissues for heavy metal analysis 86 14 100
Blubber, muscle, liver and kidney tissues for organochlorines analy 86 14 100
20 6 26
Tissues for lipid analysis
86 14 100
Tissues for various analysis
5 0 5Intestine contents for prey species identification
86 5 91
Tissues for virus test
Mammary grand; lactation status, measurement and histological sam- 14 14- 0 0
Collection of maternal milk sample- 14 14
Uterine horn; measurement and endometrium sample- 14 14
Collection of ovary
3 1 4Photographic record of foetus
3 1 4
Foetal sex (identified by visual observation)
3 1 4
Foetal length and weight3 1 4External measurements of foetus
3 1 4
Foetal tissues for various analysis
86 - 86
Testis and epididymis; weight and histological sample
86 14 100
Collection of serum sample
86 14 100
Collection of whole blood sample- 1 1
Whole blood samples from umbilical cord
86 14 100
Stomach content, conventional record
86 14 100Volume and weight of stomach content in each compartment
86 14 100
Stomach contents for feeding study
86 14 100
Record of external parasites
0 0 0Collection of external parasites
86 14 100
Record of internal parasites
0 2 2
Collection of internal parasites
86 14 100
Earplug for age determination
86 14 100
Tympanic bulla for age determination- Maxillally teeth for age determination
Largest baleen plate for morphologic study and age determination 86 14 100
86 14 100
Baleen plate measurements (length and breadth)
86 14 100
Length of each baleen plate series
86 14 100
Vertebral epiphyses sample
0 0 0
Number of vertebrae
86 14 100
Number of ribs
20 6 26
Brain weight
86 14 100
Skull measurement (length and breadth)

M F T
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
4 9 1351 49 100
4 9 1351 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
4 9 1351 49 100
2 3 5
51 32 83
- 49 49- 1 1- 49 49- 49 49
4 3 7
4 3 7
4 3 7
4 3 7
4 3 7
51 - 51
51 49 100
51 49 100
- 23 23
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
4 0 451 49 100
2 0 2
51 49 100
51 49 100
- - 51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
51 49 100
4 9 1351 49 100
3 9 1247 46 93

M F T
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
12 15 27
21 29 50
12 15 27
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
12 15 27
21 29 50
0 4 4
21 8 29- 29 29- 3 3- 29 29- 29 29
15 16 31
15 16 31
15 16 31
15 16 31
15 16 31
21 - 21
21 29 50
21 29 50
- 1 1
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
0 6 6
21 29 50
0 1 1
21 29 50
21 29 50
- - 21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
21 29 50
12 15 27
21 29 50
12 15 27
19 27 46

M
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0
3
3
1
3
1
3

Samples and data

16

F
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
2
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2

T
5
5
5
5
5
3
5
3
5
5
5
3
5
5
3
2
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
5
5
0
5
5
5
5
4
5
1
5
5
3
5
3
5

Table 7. Compositon of sex and sexual maturity of common minke whales collected by the2005 JARPN II survey
Sub-area
7
8
9CombinedImm.
4(12.5)
3(21.4)
9(16.7)
16(16.0)

Male
Mat. Unknown Total
195
28(59.4)(15.6)(87.5)
4
07(28.6)(0.0)(50.0)
32
10
51(59.3)(18.5)(94.4)
55
15
86(55.0)(15.0)(86.0)

Imm Ovu.
30(9.4) (0.0)
52(35.7) (14.3)
00(0.0) (0.0)82(8.0) (2.0)

FemaleRest. Preg.
01(0.0) (3.1)00(0.0) (0.0)03(0.0) (5.6)04(0.0) (4.0)

Combined
Total
4(12.5)
7(50.0)
3(5.6)
14(14.0)

32(100.0)14(100.0)54(100.0)100(100.0)Sex ratio(% males)87.5

Maturity
Male Female
67.9 25.0

Pregnancy
rate*)
100.0

50.0

57.1

28.6

0.0

94.4

62.7

100.0

100.0

86.0

64.0

42.9

66.7

*) Apparent pregnancy rate

Table 8. Compositon of sex and sexual maturity of Bryde’s whales collected by the 2005
JARPN II survey
MaleImm. Mat. Total
8
10
18(20.5) (25.6) (46.2)
2
1
3(25.0) (12.5) (37.5)000(0.0) (0.0) (0.0)
101121(20.0) (22.0) (42.0)

Sub-area
7
8
9CombinedImm
10(25.6)
2(25.0)
1(33.3)
13(26.0)

FemaleCombined
Ovu Rest. Preg. Lact. Preg&Lact Total
1
2
4
4
0
21
39
(2.6) (5.1) (10.3) (10.3)(0.0)(53.8) (100.0)
0
0
3
0
0
5
8
(0.0) (0.0) (37.5) (0.0)(0.0)(62.5) (100.0)
0
2
0
0
0
3
3
(0.0) (66.7) (0.0) (0.0)(0.0)(100.0) (100.0)
1
4
7
4
0
29
50
(2.0) (8.0) (14.0) (8.0)(0.0)(58.0) (100.0)

Sex ratio(% males)46.2

MaturityPregnancy
Male Female
rate*)
55.6 52.4
72.7

37.5

33.3

60.0

100.0

0.0

-

66.7

0.0

42.0

52.4

55.2

68.8

*) Apparent pregnancy rate

Table 9. Compositon of sex and sexual maturity of sei whales collected by the 2005
JARPN II survey
Sub-area
7
8
9Combined

Imm.
0

Male
Mat. Total
0
0

3
10
13
(9.7) (32.3) (41.9)
43438(5.8) (49.3) (55.1)
74451(7.0) (44.0) (51.0)

Imm
0

Ovu
0

3
1
(9.7) (3.2)
111(15.9) (1.4)
142(14.0) (2.0)

Rest.
0

FemalePreg. Lact.
0
0

1
13
0
(3.2) (41.9) (0.0)1161(1.4) (23.2) (1.4)2291(2.0) (29.0) (1.0)*) Apparent pregnancy rate

17

Combined
0

Total
0

0

0
(0.0)
1
(1.4)
1
(1.0)

18
(58.1)
31(44.9)
49(49.0)

31(100.0)69(100.0)100(100.0)

Preg&Lact

Sex ratio(% males)0.0

MaturityPregnancy
Male Female
rate*)
0.0
0.0
0.0

41.9

76.9

83.3

86.7

55.1

89.5

64.5

90.0

51.0

86.3

71.4

88.6

Table 10. Statistics of body length (m) of common minke whales collected by the 2005
JARPN II survey
Sub area
7

Mean S.D.
7.32 0.63

Male
Min
5.11

n
28

FemaleMean S.D. Min Max
6.25 1.81 4.59 8.79

Max
8.08

n
4

8

6.72

1.19

4.72

7.68

7

6.44

1.33

5.03

8.69

7

9

7.25

0.82

4.49

8.12

51

8.33

0.19

8.17

8.54

3

Combined

7.23

0.80

4.49

8.12

86

6.79

1.51

4.59

8.79

14

Table 11. Statistics of body length (m) of Bryde’s whales collected by the 2005
JARPN II survey
Sub area
7

Mean S.D.
11.52 1.05

Male
Min Max
9.86 13.02

n18

FemaleMean S.D. Min Max
11.97 1.13 10.09 14.18

n
21

8

10.90

1.25

9.78

12.25

3

12.18

0.74

11.11 13.02

5

9

-

-

-

-

0

11.18

2.00

8.92

12.70

3

Combined

11.44

1.07

9.78

13.02

21

11.93

1.16

8.92

14.18

29

Table 12. Statistics of body length (m) of sei whales collected by the 2005 JARPN II survey
Sub area
7

Mean
-

S.D.
-

Male
Min
-

Max
-

n
0

Mean
-

FemaleS.D. Min Max
-

8

13.51

1.23

10.13 14.88

13

14.27

1.61

9.06

15.47

18

9

13.54

0.82

10.41 15.00

38

13.94

1.16

10.93 15.44

31

Combined

13.53

0.93

10.13 15.00

51

14.06

1.33

9.06

49

18

15.47

n
0

Table 13. Statistics of body length (m) of sperm whales collected by the 2005 JARPN II survey
Sub area

Male
Mean S.D. Min Max
9.15
10.60 0.48 10.26 10.94
10.12 0.90 9.15 10.94

7
8
9
Combined

n
0
1
2
3

FemaleMean S.D. Min Max
9.28
8.90
9.09 0.27 8.90 9.28

n
1
1
0
2

Table 14. Frequency of male common minke whales with anomalous testes tissues in the 2005
JARPN II survey

Area

Maturity

7

Immature
MatureUnknown
Combined
Immature
MatureCombined
Immature
MatureUnknown
Combined
Immature
MatureUnknown
Combined

8

9Combined

Anomalousn Normal One Both
Combined(%)
side side
4
4
0
0
0
(0.0)
19
12
7
0
7
(36.8)
55
5(100.0)
28
16
7
5
12
(42.9)
3
3
0
0
0
(0.0)
4
3
1
0
1
(25.0)
7
6
1
0
1(14.3)
9
9
0
0
0
(0.0)
32
22
10
0
10
(31.3)
1010
10(100.0)
51
31
10 10
20
(39.2)
16
16
0
0
0
(0.0)
55
37
18
0
18
(32.7)
15
15
15(100.0)
86
53
18 15
33
(38.4)

19

Table 15. Prey species and stomach contents weight (1st. + 2nd. stomachs) found in stomachof common minke, Bryde's, sei and sperm whales sampled by the 2005 JARPN II
surveysCommon minke whale (Broken 11; Empty 17)
Prey species
Copepods
Krill
Fish

Neocalanus spp.

Pacific saury
Japanese anchovy
Walleye pollock
Unidentified fishes
Chub mackerel
Salmonidae
Japanese pomfret*SquidsMinimal armhook squid
Japanese common squid**: Minor prey species

N(Dominant)
2
17
24
16
6
3
1
1
2

Range of weight (kg)in the stomachs
1.0, 1.9
1.2 - 65.7
2.8 - 89.1
2.2 - 104.9
2.5 - 115.2<0.1 - 30.0
10.7
6.7
22.6, 27.2-

Bryde's whale (Empty 22)
Prey species
Krill
Fish

Krill
Japanese anchovy
Chub mackerel*Japanese sardine**: Minor prey species

N(Dominant)13
15

Range of weight (kg)in the stomachs<0.1 - 134.3<0.1 - 257.5

N(Dominant)34
36
5

Range of weight (kg)in the stomachs<0.1 - 389.1<0.1 - 346.8<0.1 - 186.3-

Sei whale (Broken 2; Empty 23)
Prey species
Copepods
Krill
Fish

Neocalanus spp.

Pacific saury
Japanese anchovy*
Chub mackerel*
SquidsJapanese common squid**: Minor prey species

20Table 16. Summary of biopsy skin sampling for right whales in the 2005 JARPN II survey

Whalespecies
Right
whale

NumberTargeted Number Number Numberofindividuals
of
of
of
Ship
experiments
shootshits
samples
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
SSVs
1
2
5
3
2

Effort
(hr)
(F)
0h30m

sampleper
trial(E)/(C)
0.40

Table 17. Summary of photo ID for right whales in the 2005 JARPN II survey

Whalespecies
Right
whale

Ship

SSVs

Numberofexperiments(A)
1

Targeted
individuals
(B)
2

21

Numberoftrials(C)2

sampleperhit(E)/(D)
0.67

9N
7N

8N

7MI 7MO
8S
7SI

9S

7SO

Fig 1. Map showing the research area and strata of the JARPN II full-scale program.

22

Fig. 2. Track-line covered by the three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) during thenormal survey of the 2005 JARPN II (Red line: BC mode; Blue line: BS mode).

Fig. 3. Track-line covered by the three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) during the special
survey of the 2005 JARPN II (Red line: BC mode; Blue line: BS mode).

23

Fig. 4. Track-line covered by the three sighting/sampling vessels (SSVs) during thecooperative surveys of the 2005 JARPN II (Red line: BC mode; Blue line: BS mode).

Fig. 5. Track-line covered by the three sighting vessel (SV:KS2) during the special
survey of the 2005 JARPN II.

24

Fig. 6. Positions of the sightings and samplings of the common minke whales(●: sighted and sampled, 〇: sighted only).

Fig. 7. Positions of the sightings and samplings of the Bryde’s whales(◆: sighted and sampled, ◇: sighted only).

25

Fig. 8. Positions of the sightings and samplings of the sei whales(■: sighted and sampled, □: sighted only).

Fig. 9. Positions of the sightings and samplings of the sperm whales(▼: sighted and sampled, ▽: sighted only).

26

Fig. 10. Positions of the sightings of the Blue whales (□)

Fig. 11. Positions of the sightings of the fin whales (□)

27

Fig. 12. Positions of the sightings of the humpback whales (〇).

Fig. 13. Positions of the sightings of the right whales (〇).

28

Fig. 14. Positions of the sightings of common minke, Bryde’s, sei and sperm whales in
dedicated sighting survey by KS2 (〇: minke, ◇: Bryde’s, □: sei, ▽: sperm)

Fig. 15. Positions of the sightings of humpback and fin whales in dedicated sighting survey by
KS2 (〇: humpback, □: fin).

29

Fig. 16. Positions of the sightings of blue and right whales in dedicated sighting survey by KS2(□: blue, 〇: right).

30

Minke whale
From May to June
1994 – 2004 (N=303)

2005 (N=22)

From July to September
1994 – 2004 (N=511)

2005 (N=49)

Fig.17-a. The comparison of prey species of common minke whale between previous seasonsand this season: Krill,: Japanese anchovy,: Walleye pollock,: Pacific saury,: Common squid,31: Others

Sei whale
From May to June
2000 – 2004 (N=30)

2005 (N=46)

From July to September
2000 – 2004 (N=106)

2005 (N=29)

Fig.17-b. The comparison of prey species of sei whale between previous seasons and thisseason: Copepods,: Krill,: Japanese anchovy,: Others

32: Pacific saury,Bryde’s whale
From May to June
2000 – 2004 (N=87)

2005 (N=8)

From July to September
2000 – 2004 (N=95)

2005 (N=20)

Fig.17-c. The comparison of prey species of Bryde’s whale between previous seasons and thisseason: Krill,: Japanese anchovy,: Chub mackerel,

33: Others

Common minke whale
8030
Sub area 7
N =43

60

Sub area 9
N =444

40

%

%

20

10

20
0
0

50

100

0

150

0

50

mm

100

150

100

150

mm

Bryde’s whale
60.0

60.0
Sub area 7
N = 100

Cooperative survey
N = 295

40.0

%

%

40.0

20.0

20.0

0.0

0.0
0

50

100

150

0

mm

50
mm

60.0
Sub area 8
N = 50

%

40.0

20.0

0.0
0

50

100

150

100

150

mm

Sei whale80
Sub area 9
N =50

%

60

40

20

0
0

50
mm

Fig.18. The size frequency distribution of Japanese anchovy fed on by whales in each area.

34

Minke whale

Sei whale40

40

Sub area 9
N =364

30

20

%

%

30

Sub area 9
N =67

10

20
10

0

0
100

150

200

250

300

350

100

mm

150

200

250

300

350

mm

Fig.19. The size frequency distribution of Pacific saury fed on by whales in each area.

35

Appendix 1
Offshore prey species survey of JARPN II in 2005

SHIGEYUKI KAWAHARA1, HIROTO MURASE2, HIKARU WATANABE1, SHIROH YONEZAKI1, DAISUKE SHIMIZU3

1National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, 2-12-4 Fukuura, Kanazawa, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-8648,
Japan

2

The Institute of Cetacean Research, Toyomi-cho 4-5, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055, Japan

3

Field Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Minato-cho 3-1-1, Hakodata, Hokkaido 041-8611, Japan

Contact e-mail: kawahara@fra.affrc.go.jp
ABSTRACTA prey species survey was conducted in offshore two blocks of the western North Pacific in cooperation withthe sampling survey by the Nisshin Maru in July-August 2005. The primary objective of the prey species survey
was to examine prey environment and prey preference of Bryde’s, minke and sei whales. The distribution andabundance of the prey species were investigated with the quantitative echosounder (EK60), midwater trawl and
MOCNESS of a trawler-type research vessel, Shunyo-maru, during the daytime. Acoustic data were acquiredby steaming at about 10 knots along the track lines with operating frequency at 38, 70 and 120 kHz. Species andsize compositions of acoustical backscatterings were identified by targeting midwater trawl and MOCNESS.
Another type of trawlings was made at predetermined stations to estimate the distribution and abundance of
cephalopods and neustonic organisms that are difficult to detect with the echosounder. In the western block
where Bryde’s whales were found, the abundance of prey was low and larvae of Japanese anchovy were
sampled by MOCNESS. In the eastern block Japanese anchovy tends to occur in the southern part where sei
whales were found. And Pacific saury occurs in the northern part where minke whales were found.

INTRODUCTION
After two-year feasibility surveys, the government of Japan submitted the full-scale Research Plan for Cetacean Studies
in the Western North Pacific under Special Permit (JARPN II) to the 54th IWC/SC (Government of Japan 2002). The
overall goal of JARPN II is to contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of marine living resources including
whales in the western North Pacific, especially within Japan’s EEZ. The priority of this plan is to examine feeding
habits of major cetacean species and ecosystem studies, including studies on prey consumption by cetaceans, prey
preference (selection) of cetaceans, and ecosystem modelling. In JARPN II, the cooperative whale/prey surveys are36

conducted to estimate the prey selection of cetaceans. In 2005, the prey species survey was conducted in cooperation
with Nisshin Maru in two blocks in the offshore region of the western North Pacific. This document presents thepreliminary results of this prey survey.

MATERIALS AND METHOD
Survey period and areas
The prey species survey was conducted in July-August 2005 in cooperation with Nisshin Maru; first from July 12 to 25
in the western block and second from July 27 to August 11 in the eastern block by a stern-trawler type research vessel,
Shunyo-maru (887 GT) of Fisheries Research Agency (Fig. 1). Time difference between the whale and prey species
surveys was controlled less than about one week so that results of two surveys were comparable. Research hour wasfrom an hour after sunrise to an hour before sunset while the maximum research hours were set at 13 hours.

In each block a zigzag track line was set independently from the whale survey. The way points of planned track lines
were shown in Table 1. The distribution and abundance of the prey species were investigated with the quantitativeechosounder (Simrad EK60), midwater trawl, and Multiple Opening and Closing Nets Environmental Sampling System(MOCNESS). CTD casts were conducted down to 500 m at each sampling station to measure vertical temperature andsalinity profiles in the study area.

Acoustic data acquisition and analyses
During the daytime, the ship steamed at around 10 knots along the track line. To record acoustic data a quantitativeecho sounder (Simrad EK60 with program version 1.4.3.64) with operating frequency at 38, 70 and 120 kHz was used.
The transducers were hull-mounted at the depth of 4.3 m from the surface. Calibrations were carried out in Sendai Bay
in July 25 using the copper sphere technique described in EK 60 online help manual. Acoustic data are being analyzed
now with the aid of Sonar Data Echoview (version 3.00.74.01) at the laboratory.

Trawl sampling
The midwater trawl net used was 86.3 m long with a mouth opening of ca. 900 m2 and a 6.0 m cod end with a 17.5 x
17.5 mm mesh inner. The sampling depth and the height of the mouth of the net were monitored with the Scanmer
transducers attached to the head and bottom ropes of the trawl. Towing speed of the trawl net was 4-5 knot. Two typesof mid-water trawlings were made during daylight period. Targeting trawlings were to identify the species and size
compositions of biological backscatterings detected by the echosounder. Another type of trawlings was made atpredetermined stations to estimate the distribution and abundance of cephalopods and neustonic organisms that are
difficult to detect with the echosounder. At predetermined stations the midwater trawl net was towed at surface or in a37

stairs-like fashion at three depth layers (0-30m, 30-60m and 60-90m) shallower than 100 m. Towing duration was 30
minutes in total, 10 minutes for each layer. All samples were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible and wet
weight of each species was measured aboard the vessel. For the major species, body length of 100 individuals wasmeasured to examine their size composition. Some frozen samples were taken for further analysis in the laboratory.

MOCNESS sampling
During the survey we used MOCNESS to examine species/size compositions and vertical distribution pattern of mesoand macro-zooplanktons. The mouth opening and mesh size of the net were 1 m2 and 0.33 x 0.33 mm, respectively.
MOCNESS was towed at about 2 knots in 8 target depths (0-20m, 20-40m, 40-60m, 60-80m, 80-100m, 100-150m, 150200m, and 200-250m) during the daytime. The volume of water filtered by each net was measured with a flow meter
mounted at the net mouth. Samples were preserved in 10 % formalin-buffered seawater for further analysis in thelaboratory.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
During the survey, we conducted targeting and predetermined trawlings for 4 and 9 times in the western block and 3
and 12 times in the eastern block (Fig. 2). Results of trawlings in the eastern and western blocks are shown in Tables 2
and 3, respectively. We conducted MOCNESS for 7 Times in the western block and 4 times in the eastern block,respectively (Fig. 2). The oceanographic conditions are described in Appendix 2 in the report. While the acoustic data
and MOCNESS samples are being analyzed now, the preliminary results are as follows.

In the western block where Japanese anchovy (juveniles and adults) and krill were found in the stomachs of sampled
Bryde’s whales, the abundance of prey species was low and mainly larvae of Japanese anchovy were sampled by
MOCNESS. In the eastern block where minke and sei whales were found in the northern and southern parts,
respectively, Japanese anchovy (5-10cm in scaled length) with sardine/mackerel and Pacific saury (30-35cm in knob
length) are distributed in the southern and northern parts, respectively. Copepod and krill were distributed in thenorthern part and in the whole block, respectively. According to Nisshin Maru, minke and sei whales were distributed in
the northern and southern parts, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A special thank is given to Captain M. Onoda and the crews of Shunyo-maru for their dedication in collecting data.

38

REFERENCE
Government of Japan. 2002. Research plan for cetacean studies in the western North Pacific under Special Permit(JARPN II). Paper SC/54/O2 submitted to the 54th IWC Scientific Committee Meeting.
Watanabe, H., Yonezaki, S., Matsukura, H., Murase, H. and Kawahara, S. 2005. Offshore prey species survey of
JARPN II in 2004. Appendix 1, pp 23-28. In: Tamura, T., Fujise, Y., Mogoe, T., Kanda, N., Yasunaga, G., Konishi,K., Kiwada, H., Ogihara, M., Hasegawa, A., Kitajima, M., Sugiyama, T., Sasaki, T., Mori, M., Teraoka, T.,
Tsunekawa, M., Fukutome, K., Zharikov, L.A., NA, Jong-hun., Tohyama, D., Inagake, D. and Kawahara, S. 2005.
Cruise report of the Japanese Whale Research Program under Special Permit in the western North Pacific –Phase II(JARPN II) in 2004 (Part I) – Offshore component -. Paper SC/57/O3 submitted to the 55th IWC ScientificCommittee Meeting, 33 pp.

39

Table 1. Waypoints of planned track lines for the western (left) and eastern (right) blocks.
WP
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
WP7

Latitude
36
38
36
38
36
38
36

0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Longitude
144
45
145
15
145
45
146
15
146
45
147
15
147
45

WP
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
WP7

40

Latitude
40
0.0
41
0.0
42
0.0
43
0.0
44
0.0
45
0.0
45
32.7

Longitude
157
0.0
159
0.0
157
0.0
159
0.0
157
0.0
158
50.0
157
50.0

Table 2. Results of trawlings in the western block in 2005 offshore prey species survey.
Stn. Date
Stn

Time

採集日

2

(m)

2005.7.14

Depth Latitude Longitude Catch
曳網時間

1 5:26-16:00

曳網層
緯度(kg) larvae
adult
（m）
0-100

3 7.00.4N

Anchovy

総漁獲
量(kg)

経度

1 44.55.9E

シラス＋

ｶﾀｸﾁｲﾜｼ＋-6

2005.7.16

14:59-15:32

0-100

3 6.17.8N

1 45.41.3E

＋

-

8

2005.7.17

1 3:07-13:37

0-30

3 6.30.7N

1 45.54.1E

＋

-

22個体
ind.
11個体
ind.

11

2005.7.18

1 1:08-11:38

0-30

3 7.19.2N

1 46.00.4E

＋

-

-

12

2005.7.18

1 8:02-18:32

0-30

3 8.00.7N

1 46.15.7E

＋

＋

-

13

2005.7.19

13:01-13:31

0-30

3 7.01.5N

1 46.31.6E

0.1

0.1

-

15
16

2005.7.20
2005.7.20

10:46-11:16
15:52-16:22

0-30
0-30

35.59.3N
36.29.0N

146.44.0E
146.52.5E＋+
1 ind.
1尾--17

2005.7.21

09:03-10:03

0-100

36.55.8N

146.59.6E

0.9

0.9

6 ind.
6個体

192005.7.21

08:08-09:18

0-100

38.00.6N

147.12.0E

0.7

0.7

2 ind.
2個体

202005.7.22

1 4:40-15:10

0-30

37.31.7N

147.22.2E

0.2

0.2

-

21

2005.7.23

08:44-09:04

0-30

38.00.6N

147.12.0E

0.2

0.2

-

22

2005.7.23

11:47-12:34

0-100

37.31.7N

147.22.2E

0.2

0.2

-

Table 3. Results of trawlings in the eastern block in 2005 offshore prey species survey.
Results of MOCNESS during the offshore survey in 2004

Stn.
Stn

Date

Time

Depth Latitude
Longitude Catch Japanese
曳網層
総漁獲

曳網時間

採集日

(m)

（m）

緯度

経度

主要魚種漁獲量（kg）

Pacific量(kg)

ｶﾀｸﾁｲﾜｼ マイワシ(kg) Anchovy Sardine Mackerel Saury

1 2005.7.31

06:45-07:20

0-100

40.00.2N

156.58.3E

3 2005.7.31
4
2005.8.1

16:08-16:28
09:55-10:32

0-30
0-100

40.28.8N
40.52.0N

157.55.2E
158.40.7E

1.1

52005.8.1

15:13-15:29

0-30

41.08.1N

158.45.3E

5.0

62005.8.2

08:32-09:10

0-30

41.29.4N

158.00.3E

20.6

17.1

8

2005.8.3

07:28-07:48

0-30

42.08.7N

157.21.2E

39.6

37.2

9
10

2005.8.3
2005.8.3

12:38-13:08
17:00-17:36

0-30
0-100

42.27.6N
42.43.9N

157.53.6E
158.23.1E

1.9

0.1
0.2

11

2059.8.4

09:46-10:10

0-30

42.59.4N

158.58.2E

15.1

12
13

2059.8.4
2005.8.5

15:13-15:33
09:25-09:55

0-30
0-30

43.20.8N
43.44.0N

158.21.2E
157.28.0E

8.1

152005.8.5

16:56-17:26

0-30

44.10.6N

157.22.6E

2.6

17

2005.8.6

09:03-09:33

0-30

45.28.2N

158.07.3E

230.3

19
20

2005.8.7
2005.8.7

06:09-06:29
10:52-11:50

0-30
0-30

44.43.3N
44.27.1N

158.21.4E
157.50.1E

3.9
23.8

+
-

サンマ

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.4

2.2

0.5
-

1.3

0.2
-

14.0
-

41

マサバ

1.7
-

1.8
-

0.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.6

+

-

-

230.3

-

+
-

3.9
23.3

2.1

6.1

Eastern blockWestern block

Fig. 1. The western and eastern blocks in 2005 offshore prey species survey.
46
Predeternimed
trawl. (100m)

17
16

Predeternimed
trawl. (surface)

18

Targeting trawl45
MOCNESS
19

CTDのみ

15
20
44
13
14
12
11

43
10
9
8
42
7
5
6
41
4
3
1
40
157

2
158

159

Fig. 2. Positions of trawlings, MOCNESS and CTD only stations in the western (left)and eastern (right) blocks in 2005 offshore prey species survey.

42

Appendix 2
Oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacificin July to August 2005
Denzo Inagake*, Shigeyuki Kawahara* and Hiroto Murase***National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, 2-12-4 Fukuura, Kanazawa,
Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-8648, Japan**The Institute of Cetacean Research, Toyomi-cho 4-5, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0055,
Contact e-mail: ina@affrc.go.jp
ABSTRACTA prey species survey was conducted in July-August 2005 using R/V Shunyo Maru as a part of offshore
component of JARPN II. The survey covered two blocks; the western block where Bryde’s whales were foundand the eastern block where minke and sei whales were found. During the survey, oceanographic observation
with CTD was made to make clear the environment of the prey. In the western block, the northern part was in thewarm water with a warm-core ring and the southern part was characterized by the warm water and cold water.
The eastern block is in and around the Transition Domain which is between the Subarctic Front and the Subarctic
Boundary.

INTRODUCTION
A prey species survey was conducted in the offshore two blocks of the western North Pacific in July-August 2005
using R/V Shunyo Maru in cooperation with the sampling survey by Nisshin Maru (Fig. 1). While Bryde’s whales
were found in the western block, minke and sei whales were found in the northern and southern parts of the eastern
block, respectively.
There are a lot of water masses and fronts in the western North Pacific. The Oyashio flows southwestward along
the Kuril Islands and turns eastward from the northern coast of Japan. The Kuroshio flows northward from the tropicalarea to Tohoku area east of Japan, and reaches near the Oyashio front. Both major current, the Kuroshio and the
Oyashio, form Kuroshio-Oyashio Inter-frontal Zone. Water masses originated in the Kuroshio and the Oyashio are
mixed each other in this zone and form new water masses.
In the high sea of the North Pacific Ocean, there are Subarctic Front (temperature front defined by 4 ) and theSubarctic Boundary (salinity front defined by 34.0psu) with a week eastward flow. The Subarctic Front is south limit of
the subarctic water and the Subarctic Boundary is north limit of the tropical water. The area between these fronts iscalled the Transition Domain (Favorite et al. 1976).
Each water mass in the western North Pacific has its own ecosystem, like a Kuroshio ecosystem, an Oyashio
ecosystem, warm-core ring ecosystem, etc. So, we must make clear the oceanographic condition around whale’s preyto build up a marine ecosystem model in this area. In this paper, distributions of water masses and fronts in the two
blocks will be described to make clear the environment of the prey of Bryde’s, sei and minke whales.

METHODS
Hydrographic observations with a conductivity-temperature-depth profiler (CTD; SBE 911plus) were carried out
from 13 to 23 July in the western block and from July to 8 August 2005 in the eastern block of the Kuroshio-Oyashio
Inter-frontal Zone using R/V Shunyo Maru. Salinity compensation for CTD data was not done using water sampling
data.

43

Oceanic fronts and water masses are usually detected by subsurface temperature map, because they are obscure insea surface temperature distributions from summer to fall seasons and the Oyashio water spreads into the subsurface
layer (Table 1). The Kuroshio Extension is defined by the 14 isotherm at the depth of 200m (Kawai , 1969). The
warm water spread from Kuroshio Extension is defied by temperature more than 10 at the depth of 100 m . The first
and the second Oyashio Intrusions are defined by temperature lass than 5 at the depth of 100 m (Murakami, 1994).
Subarctic front and the Subarctic Boundary is defined by 4 temperature front and 34.0psu salinity front, respectively(Favorite et al. 1976). We use these indices to know the distribution of water mass in the two blocks.
The oceanographic conditions in July 2005 were analyzed by Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute (TNFRI),
which used quasi-real-time data from several cooperative organs and prefectures, those were Fisheries Research Agency,
Meteorological Agency, Hydrographic Department and Fisheries Experiment Stations, etc. TNFRI publishedtemperature maps and schematic hydrographic maps using World Wide Web(http://www.myg.affrc.go.jp/kaiyo/temp/temp.html).

OCEANOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS IN THE WESTERN BLOCK
The upper panel in Fig. 2 shows the Temperature-Salinity diagrams in the western block. Light blue dots show thedata in cold waters defined by 100 m temperature which is over 5 and less than 10 . Green dots show the data inwarm water spread from the Kuroshio Extension defined by 100 m temperature over 10 and 200 m temperature lessthan 14 . There is no typical Kuroshio water characterized by high salinity profile around 34.5psu and Oyashio water
characterized by cold profile less than 5 shown blue dots in lower panel in Fig. 2. It is appear that water masses in thewestern block have characteristics of the mixed water of the Oyashio and the Kuroshio.
Figure 3 shows temperature maps at the depth of 100 m and 200 m. The warm water spread from the Kuroshio
appears in the northwestern part of the block and cold water less than 10 was distributed in the southeastern part ofthis block. Figure 5 shows warm water (yellow area in Fig. 5) was spreading from offshore area to the northern part ofthe block and cold water (green area in Fig. 5) was spreading from the Tohoku coast to southern part of the block.
Figure 5 also shows the Kuroshio warm-core ring around 37ﾟ50’N, 144ﾟ50’E, and Fig. 3 shows a temperature front in
the northwestern part of the survey area. So, St. 3 was in the warm-core ring.
Figure 4 shows the vertical sections of temperature along 36ﾟN, 37ﾟN and 38ﾟN. The warm water, warmer than
20 , spread at the surface layer upper 20 m depth, and seasonal thermocline lies around the depth of 50 m. The warm
water defined by warmer than 10 is observed above 100 m depth in the southern sections but this warm water isdeepened in the northern area to the depth of 200 m. On the 38ﾟN section, the thermocline rises eastward, it is caused
by a temperature front of the Kuroshio warm-core ring shown in Fig. 5.
These figure shows that northern part of the western block was in the warm water spread from the Kuroshio and thesouthern part of this block was characterized by the warm water and cold water. The northwestern station of this block
was in the Kuroshio warm-core ring.

OCEANOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS IN THE EASTERN BLOCK
Figure 2 shows the Temperature-Salinity diagrams using CTD station data. Water masses in the eastern block(lower panel in Fig. 2) have characteristics of cold low-salinity water (the subarctic water in the lower part of Fig. 2).
Some of these stations show warm surface water above the subarctic water (left upper part of Fig. 2).
Figure 6 shows the 100 m depth temperature map observed by R/V Shunyo Maru. The cold water less than 5 wasdistributed in a northern half of the block. The Subarctic Front (defined by 4 isotherm) was observed around 43ﾟN to
43-30ﾟN in Fig. 6. In 100 m depth salinity map (Fig. 7), a salinity front around 34.0psu is shown in the southern part ofthis survey area, but is not shown in 200 m depth salinity map.
Figure 8 shows the vertical sections of temperature and salinity along the cruise track of R/V Shunyo Maru between
157ﾟE-159ﾟE, which is a zigzag line. The Subarctic Water colder than 4 is observed in the northern area, north of
43ﾟN, and 4 isotherm lies vertically from 50 m depth to 500 m depth around St. 12. A surface low salinity water lessthan 33.5psu is also observed in the northern area, north of St. 12, The high salinity water, grater than 34psu, is shownat a surface layer in the southern area, south of St. 3. Around St. 3, isotherms between 5 and 10 lie vertically andshow an existence of a temperature front. Because the salinity front around 34psu is limited in the surface layer, upper
100 m depth, it is not a typical Subarctic Boundary, but it is a part of the Subarctic Boundary.
Figure 5 shows the schematic hydrographic map in July 2005, presented by TNFRI. The cold water, colder than
5 lies around 42 ﾟ N, 152 ﾟ E and 43 ﾟ 30’N, 158 ﾟ 30’E. The eastern block is a northeastern part of Fig. 5 and thestations were denoted by light blue stars and blue circles, which denote stations in the cold area and the Oyashio area,
44

respectively. Northern part of our stations, north of 43 ﾟ 30’N, is blue circles, and southern part of our stations shows
light blue stars, that is coincide with the schematic hydrographic map shown in Fig. 5.
These figure shows that the eastern block is in and around the Transition Domain which is between the Subarctic
Front and the Subarctic Boundary.

REFERENCES
Favorite, F., A. J. Dodimead and K.Nasu (1976): Oceanography of the Subarctic Pacific Region, 1960-71. Bull. 33,
International North Pacific Fisheries Commission, 187 pp.
Kawai, H. (1969): Statistical estimation of isotherms indicative of the Kuroshio axis, Deep-Sea Res., 16, 109-115.
Murakami, M. (1994): On long-term variations in hydrographic conditions in the Tohoku area, Bull. Tohoku Natl. Fish.
Res. Inst., No. 56, 47-56 (in Japanese with English abstract).

45

Table 1. Extraction method from temperature map to determine the position of each water mass.
Target characteristics

Extraction method

Kuroshio Extension Axis

14

isotherm at 200m

Warm-core ringTemperature front at 200m

Oyashio front

5

Oyashio water

Area with T<5Cold water

Area with 5 <T<10

Warm water

isotherm at 100m
at 100m
at 100m

Area with T>10

at 100m and T<14

Subarctic Boundary

Salinity front defined by 34.0psu

Subarctic Front

Temperature front defined by 446

at 200m

Eastern blockWestern block

Fig. 1. Station map observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 13−23 July in the western block (left panel) and 30 July – 8
August in the eastern block (right panel) 2005. Green triangles, light blue stars and blue circles denote CTD
stations observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in the warm area, cold area and the Oyashio area, respectively. Green
triangles, light blue stars and blue circles denote CTD stations in the warm area (100 m temperature was over
10 and 200 m temperature was less than 14 ), the cold area (100 m temperature was over 5 and less than10 ) and the Oyashio area (100 m temperature was less than 5 ), respectively.

47

Fig. 2. Temperature-Salinity diagrams using CTD station data observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 13−23 July in thewestern block (upper panel) and 30 July – 8 August in the eastern block (lower panel) 2005. Each thin line inthis figure denotes a density line of sigma-t.

48

Fig. 3. 100 m (left panel) and 200 m (right panel) temperature maps observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 13 – 23 July
2005 in the western block.

Fig. 4. Vertical sections of temperature along 36 ﾟ N (left panel), 37 ﾟ N (middle panel) and 38 ﾟ N (right panel)observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 13– 23 August 2005 in the western block.

49

Tsugaru
Warm
Water
Warmcore
Ring

WarmcoreRing
1st Oyashio
Intrusion

Warm
Warm- Water
core
Ring

Kuroshio
Area

Fig. 5. Schematic hydrographic map in Tohoku area, northwestern Pacific, in July 2005 (presented by Tohoku National
Fisheries Research Institute) with station map observed by R/V Shunyo Maru. Blue, green, yellow and red area
show distributions of the Oyashio, the cold water, the warm water spread from the Kuroshio Extension and theKuroshio Extension, respectively. Green area shows distribution of cold water between the Oyashio and warm
water spread from the Kuroshio Extension. Green triangles, light blue stars and blue circles denote CTD
stations observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in the warm area, cold area and the Oyashio area, respectively.

50

Fig.6. 100 m (left panel) and 200 m (right panel) temperature maps observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 30 July – 8
August 2005 in the eastern block.

Fig.7. 100 m (left panel) and 200 m (right panel) salinity maps observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 30 July – 8 August
2005 in the eastern block.

51

Fig. 8. Vertical sections of temperature (upper panel) and salinity (lower panel) along the cruise track between 157 ﾟ E159 ﾟ E observed by R/V Shunyo Maru in 30 July – 8 August 2005 in the eastern block.

52