日本原子力学会標準
AESJ-SC-P005:2021「原子力発電所の高経年化対策実施基準：2021」

正誤表

No.

頁

誤

正

備考

まえがき
1

ⅰ

省令

原子力規制委員会規則

別紙参照

2

ⅳ

日本語と不一致

日本語と一致

別紙参照

3

ⅴ,ⅵ

Attachment A～F

Attachment

別紙参照

4

ⅵ

日本語と不一致

日本語と一致

別紙参照

別紙
誤

ṇ

ࡲ࠼ࡀࡁ

ࡲ࠼ࡀࡁ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2021 ࡣ㸪୍⯡♫ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍ࡀᶆ‽ጤဨ఍ࢩࢫ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2021 ࡣ㸪୍⯡♫ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍ࡀᶆ‽ጤဨ఍ࢩࢫ

ࢸ࣒Ᏻ඲ᑓ㛛㒊఍ PLM ศ⛉఍㸪ྠᑓ㛛㒊఍㸪ྠጤဨ఍࡛ࡢᑂ㆟ࢆ⤒࡚ไᐃࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛㸪㍍ỈᆺཎᏊࢸ࣒Ᏻ඲ᑓ㛛㒊఍ PLM ศ⛉఍㸪ྠᑓ㛛㒊఍㸪ྠጤဨ఍࡛ࡢᑂ㆟ࢆ⤒࡚ไᐃࡋࡓࡶࡢ࡛㸪㍍ỈᆺཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㐠㌿࣭⟶⌮ࢆ⾜࠺஦ᴗ⪅ࡀ⾜࠺㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲࢆつᐃࡋࡓᶆ‽࡛ࡍࠋ

ຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㐠㌿࣭⟶⌮ࢆ⾜࠺஦ᴗ⪅ࡀ⾜࠺㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲࢆつᐃࡋࡓᶆ‽࡛ࡍࠋࡇࡢᶆ‽࡛ࡣ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇࡜࠸࠺⏝ㄒࢆ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔ࡇࡢᶆ‽࡛ࡣ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇࡜࠸࠺⏝ㄒࢆ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔⤫ཬࡧᶵჾ࡟᝿ᐃࡉࢀࡿ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡀᏳ඲ᶵ⬟࡟୚࠼ࡿᙳ㡪ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪㛗ᮇ㛫ࡢ⤫ཬࡧᶵჾ࡟᝿ᐃࡉࢀࡿ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡀᏳ඲ᶵ⬟࡟୚࠼ࡿᙳ㡪ࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ ࡼࡗ࡚ 㸪㛗ᮇ㛫ࡢ౪⏝ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓάືࢆ⾜࠺ࡇ࡜࡜࠸࠺ព࿡࡛౑⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ

౪⏝ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓάືࢆ⾜࠺ࡇ࡜࡜࠸࠺ព࿡࡛౑⏝ࡋ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ

ᡃࡀᅜ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢᏳ඲࣭Ᏻᐃ㐠㌿ࢆ☜ಖࡍࡿࡓࡵ㸪ᐃᮇⓗ࡟㐠㌿ࢆ೵Ṇࡋ࡚㸪ᡃࡀᅜ࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡣ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢᏳ඲࣭Ᏻᐃ㐠㌿ࢆ☜ಖࡍࡿࡓࡵ㸪ᐃᮇⓗ࡟㐠㌿ࢆ೵Ṇࡋ࡚㸪ᐃᮇ஦ᴗ⪅᳨ᰝ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪┬௧࡟ᐃࡵࡿᢏ⾡ᇶ‽࡬ࡢ㐺ྜᛶࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪஦ᴗ⪅ࡢಖᏲ┬௧࡟ᐃᮇ஦ᴗ⪅᳨ᰝ࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪ཎᏊຊつไጤဨ఍つ๎࡟ᐃࡵࡿᢏ⾡ᇶ‽࡬ࡢ㐺ྜᛶࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡿ࡜࡜ࡶཎᏊຊつไጤဨ఍つ๎࡟⟶⌮࡟࠾ࡅࡿಖ඲άື࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪ᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔⤫ཪࡣᶵჾࡢ೺඲ᛶ☜ㄆ㸪Ᏻ඲ᶵ⬟ࡢ⥔ᣢཬࡧಙ㢗ᛶ࡟㸪஦ᴗ⪅ࡢಖᏲ⟶⌮࡟࠾ࡅࡿಖ඲άື࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪ᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔⤫ཪࡣᶵჾࡢ೺඲ᛶ☜ㄆ㸪Ᏻ඲ᶵ⬟ࡢ⥔ᣢ࣭ྥୖࡀᅗࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣛࣥࢺ㐠㌿୰࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡶ㸪ഴྥ┘ど㸪ᕠどⅬ᳨㸪ᐃ౛ヨࡢ⥔ᣢཬࡧಙ㢗ᛶࡢ⥔ᣢ࣭ྥୖࡀᅗࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋࡲࡓ㸪ࣉࣛࣥࢺ㐠㌿୰࡟࠾࠸࡚ࡶ㸪ഴྥ┘ど㸪㦂࡞࡝ࡢ≧ែ┘ど࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪ᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔⤫ཪࡣᶵჾࡢ␗ᖖ඙ೃࡢᢕᥱࡀ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋ

ᕠどⅬ᳨㸪ᐃ౛ヨ㦂࡞࡝ࡢ≧ែ┘ど࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪ᵓ⠏≀㸪⣔⤫ཪࡣᶵჾࡢ␗ᖖ඙ೃࡢᢕᥱࡀ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡲࡍࠋࡇࡢᶆ‽ࡣ㸪ᖹᡂ 19 ᖺ 3 ᭶࡟㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2007 ࡜ࡋ࡚ึ∧ࢆⓎ⾜ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋึ∧࡛ࡣ㸪ཎᏊ⅔ࡢ㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30 ᖺ௨㝆ࢆᛕ㢌࡟࠾࠸ࡓ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲࢆつᐃࡋ࡚ࡇࡢᶆ‽ࡣ㸪ᖹᡂ 19 ᖺ 3 ᭶࡟㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2007 ࡜ࡋ࡚ึ∧ࢆⓎ⾜ࡋ࠸ࡲࡋࡓࡀ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ᳨ᰝไᗘࡢᨵၿ࡟ྥࡅࡓ᳨ウ࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡢࡓࡵ㸪㏿ࡸ࠿࡟ᨵᐃస

ࡲࡋࡓࠋึ∧࡛ࡣ㸪ཎᏊ⅔ࡢ㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30 ᖺ௨㝆ࢆᛕ㢌࡟࠾࠸ࡓ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲࢆつᐃࡋ࡚ᴗ࡟╔ᡭࡋ㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶࢆᩚ⌮ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪㐠㌿ึᮇ࠿ࡽ㸪10 ᖺࡈ࡜㸪㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30࠸ࡲࡋࡓࡀ㸪ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ࡟ᑐࡍࡿ᳨ᰝไᗘࡢᨵၿ࡟ྥࡅࡓ᳨ウ࡜ࡢ㐃ᦠࡢࡓࡵ㸪㏿ࡸ࠿࡟ᨵᐃస

ᖺ௨㝆ࡢࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢẁ㝵࡟ᛂࡌࡓ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋ෆᐜࢆྲྀࡾࡲ࡜ࡵ㸪つᐃ໬ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ᴗ࡟╔ᡭࡋ㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶࢆᩚ⌮ࡍࡿࡇ࡜࡟ࡼࡗ࡚㸪㐠㌿ึᮇ࠿ࡽ㸪10 ᖺࡈ࡜㸪㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30ᖺ௨㝆ࡢࡑࢀࡒࢀࡢẁ㝵࡟ᛂࡌࡓ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐇ᪋ෆᐜࢆྲྀࡾࡲ࡜ࡵ㸪つᐃ໬ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ᖹᡂ 21 ᖺ 2 ᭶࡟Ⓨ⾜ࡋࡓཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2008 ࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢࡼ࠺࡞Ⅼ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋࡲࡎ㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐃ⩏ࢆぢ┤ࡋ㸪㐠㌿ᮇ㛫࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟

ᖹᡂ 21 ᖺ 2 ᭶࡟Ⓨ⾜ࡋࡓཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2008 ࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢࡼ࠺࡞Ⅼᑐࡍࡿάືෆᐜࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ㸪ಖ඲ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ࡜㐃ᦠࡋࡓᐇ᪋ෆᐜࢆつᐃࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋࡲࡎ㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ࡢᐃ⩏ࢆぢ┤ࡋ㸪㐠㌿ᮇ㛫࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟⾡ホ౯ࢆᐇ᪋ࡋࡓཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ▱ぢࢆᇶ࡟ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᶵჾࡈ࡜࡟᝿ᐃࡉࢀࡿ⤒ᖺຎᑐࡍࡿάືෆᐜࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ㸪ಖ඲ࣉࣟࢢ࣒ࣛ࡜㐃ᦠࡋࡓᐇ᪋ෆᐜࢆつᐃࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋࡉࡽ࡟㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ໬஦㇟ࢆ͆⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲͇࡜ࡋ࡚ྲྀࡾࡲ࡜ࡵ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪⤒ᖺ⾡ホ౯ࢆᐇ᪋ࡋࡓཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ▱ぢࢆᇶ࡟ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᶵჾࡈ࡜࡟᝿ᐃࡉࢀࡿ⤒ᖺຎຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࢆ㐠㌿ึᮇ࠿ࡽᐇ᪋ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆせồ஦㡯࡜ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

໬஦㇟ࢆ͆⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲͇࡜ࡋ࡚ྲྀࡾࡲ࡜ࡵ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪⤒ᖺࡲࡓ㸪10 ᖺࡈ࡜ཬࡧ㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30 ᖺ௨㝆ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ᐇ

ຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࢆ㐠㌿ึᮇ࠿ࡽᐇ᪋ࡍࡿࡇ࡜ࢆせồ஦㡯࡜ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

᪋ࡍࡿᶆ‽ⓗ࡞ホ౯ࡢᡭἲࢆつ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ࡲࡓ㸪10 ᖺࡈ࡜ཬࡧ㐠㌿㛤ጞ 30 ᖺ௨㝆ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ࡑࢀࡒࢀ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟ᑐࡋ࡚ᐇ
᪋ࡍࡿᶆ‽ⓗ࡞ホ౯ࡢᡭἲࢆつ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2010㸦㏣⿵1㸧㸪2011㸦㏣⿵2㸧ཬࡧ2012㸦㏣⿵3㸧࡛ࡣ㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ19ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ22ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲ࡛࡟㸪ཎᏊຊᏳ඲ጤဨ఍࡟

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2010㸦㏣⿵1㸧㸪2011㸦㏣⿵2㸧ཬࡧ2012㸦㏣⿵3㸧࡛ࡣ㸪⤒ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࡓ8ᇶ㸦ᩔ㈡Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨୍ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ4㸪6ྕᶵ㸪὾ᒸཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪ᮾᾏ➨ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ19ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ22ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲ࡛࡟㸪ཎᏊຊᏳ඲ጤဨ఍࡟

஧Ⓨ㟁ᡤ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪኱㣤Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࡓ8ᇶ㸦ᩔ㈡Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨୍ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ4㸪6ྕᶵ㸪὾ᒸཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪ᮾᾏ➨ࡋ࡚཯ᫎࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

஧Ⓨ㟁ᡤ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪኱㣤Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ࡋ࡚཯ᫎࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2015࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢⅬ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋ
࣭ཎᏊຊつไጤဨ఍͆ᐇ⏝Ⓨ㟁⏝ཎᏊ⅔᪋タ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋࢞࢖ࢻ㸦ཎᏊຊつไጤဨ఍㸪ᖹᡂ25ᖺ12᭶6᪥㸧͇ཬࡧᮾ᪥ᮏ኱㟈⅏࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࡢ཯ᫎ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ホ౯ᑐ㇟ᶵჾཬࡧ
iཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2015࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢⅬ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋ
࣭ཎᏊຊつไጤဨ఍͆ᐇ⏝Ⓨ㟁⏝ཎᏊ⅔᪋タ࡟࠾ࡅࡿ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋࢞࢖ࢻ㸦ཎᏊຊつไጤဨ
i

ṇ

誤

ホ౯ᑐ㇟ᮇ㛫ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ࡚㸪㛗ᮇ೵Ṇ୰ࡢࣉࣛࣥࢺࡢᢏ⾡ホ౯㸪⪏ὠἼᏳ඲ᛶホ౯ཬࡧ఍㸪ᖹᡂ25ᖺ12᭶6᪥㸧͇ཬࡧᮾ᪥ᮏ኱㟈⅏࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࡢ཯ᫎ࡜ࡋ࡚㸪ホ౯ᑐ㇟ᶵჾཬࡧ

㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇᳨ウࡢ᭷ຠᛶホ౯ࢆつᐃࡋࡓࠋホ౯ᑐ㇟ᮇ㛫ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆᩚ⌮ࡋ࡚㸪㛗ᮇ೵Ṇ୰ࡢࣉࣛࣥࢺࡢᢏ⾡ホ౯㸪⪏ὠἼᏳ඲ᛶホ౯ཬࡧ࣭ᅜ㝿ཎᏊຊᶵ㛵㸦IAEA ࡢ IGALL㸦International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned㸧࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ
࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟ᑐࡍࡿᢏ⾡ホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲཬࡧ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ࡟᭱᪂▱ぢࢆ཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ

㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇᳨ウࡢ᭷ຠᛶホ౯ࢆつᐃࡋࡓࠋ࣭ᅜ㝿ཎᏊຊᶵ㛵㸦IAEA ࡢ IGALL㸦International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned㸧࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ
࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟࡟ᑐࡍࡿᢏ⾡ホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲཬࡧ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶ࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ22ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ24ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ࡟᭱᪂▱ぢࢆ཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ

࡛࡟㸪ཎᏊຊᏳ඲ጤဨ఍࡟ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࡓ5ᇶ㸦⚟ᓥ➨୍ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨஧ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ22ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ24ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⋞ᾏཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪ఀ᪉Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯࡛࡟㸪ཎᏊຊᏳ඲ጤဨ఍࡟ሗ࿌ࡉࢀࡓ5ᇶ㸦⚟ᓥ➨୍ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨஧ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢཬࡧཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㐠㌿⤒㦂ࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ࡋ࡚཯ᫎࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ

ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⋞ᾏཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪ఀ᪉Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯⾡ホ౯ࡢ▱ぢࢆᇶ࡟ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᶵჾࡈ࡜࡟⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢཬࡧཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㐠㌿⤒㦂ࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ࡋ࡚཯ᫎࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ౯ࡀᚲせ࡞㒊఩࣭⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ⤌ྜࡏࢆつᐃࡋࡓࠋ⾡ホ౯ࡢ▱ぢࢆᇶ࡟ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࢆᵓᡂࡍࡿᶵჾࡈ࡜࡟⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࢆ⪃៖ࡋࡓ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡀᚲせ࡞㒊఩࣭⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ⤌ྜࡏࢆつᐃࡋࡓࠋཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2016㸦㏣⿵1㸧㸪2017㸦㏣⿵2㸧㸪2018㸦㏣⿵3㸧ཬࡧ2019㸦㏣
⿵4㸧࡛ࡣ㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ25ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ29ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲ࡛࡟㸪ᅜࡢᑂ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2016㸦㏣⿵1㸧㸪2017㸦㏣⿵2㸧㸪2018㸦㏣⿵3㸧ཬࡧ2019㸦㏣ᰝࡀ᏶஢ࡋࡓ18ᇶ㸦ᩔ㈡Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨஧ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2㸪3㸪4ྕᶵ㸪ᓥ᰿ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪

⿵4㸧࡛ࡣ㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᖹᡂ25ᖺ11᭶࠿ࡽᖹᡂ29ᖺ10᭶ᮎࡲ࡛࡟㸪ᅜࡢᑂ὾ᒸཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ3ྕᶵ㸪ዪᕝཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪᯽ᓮส⩚ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ3ྕᶵ㸪ᰝࡀ᏶஢ࡋࡓ18ᇶ㸦ᩔ㈡Ⓨ㟁ᡤ2ྕᶵ㸪⚟ᓥ➨஧ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ2㸪3㸪4ྕᶵ㸪ᓥ᰿ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪㧗὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸦෭೵Ṇࡢ⥔ᣢ࡟ᚲせ࡞タഛࡢホ౯ࢆྵࡴ㸧㸪㧗὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ3㸪4ྕᶵ㸪⋞ᾏཎᏊຊ὾ᒸཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ3ྕᶵ㸪ዪᕝཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪᯽ᓮส⩚ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪⨾὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ3ྕᶵ㸪Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪ᕝෆཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ࡋ࡚཯ᫎ

㧗὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸦෭ ೵Ṇࡢ⥔ᣢ࡟ᚲせ࡞タഛࡢホ౯ࢆྵࡴ㸧㸪㧗὾Ⓨ㟁ᡤ3㸪4ྕᶵ㸪⋞ᾏཎᏊຊࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

Ⓨ㟁ᡤ1ྕᶵ㸪ᕝෆཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤ1㸪2ྕᶵ㸧ࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᢏ⾡ホ౯ሗ࿌᭩ࡢ▱ぢࢆ㸪᭱᪂▱ぢ࡜ࡋ࡚཯ᫎ
ࡋࡲࡋࡓࠋ

ཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2021࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢⅬ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋ࣭᭱᪂▱ぢཬࡧ㐠㌿⤒㦂ࡢ཯ᫎࡢࡓࡵࡢㄪᰝ⠊ᅖࢆ㸪᭱㏆ࡢ≧ἣ࡟ᑐᛂࡋࡓෆᐜ࡟ぢ┤ࡋࡓࠋཎᏊຊⓎ㟁ᡤࡢ㧗⤒ᖺ໬ᑐ⟇ᐇ᪋ᇶ‽㸸2021࡛ࡣ㸪୺࡟௨ୗࡢⅬ࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ᨵᐃࢆ⾜࠸ࡲࡋࡓࠋ

࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ10ᖺࡈ࡜ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢホ౯ࡢ࣭᭱᪂▱ぢཬࡧ㐠㌿⤒㦂ࡢ཯ᫎࡢࡓࡵࡢㄪᰝ⠊ᅖࢆ㸪᭱㏆ࡢ≧ἣ࡟ᑐᛂࡋࡓෆᐜ࡟ぢ┤ࡋࡓࠋᐇ᪋᪉ἲཬࡧ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ࡟᭱᪂▱ぢࢆ཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ
࣭ᅜ㝿ཎᏊຊᶵ㛵㸦IAEA ࡢIGALL㸦International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned㸧࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟཯ᫎࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪つ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋࡓࠋ࣭㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ10ᖺࡈ࡜ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲཬࡧ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧ࡢ⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ࡟᭱᪂▱ぢࢆ཯ᫎࡋࡓࠋ
࣭ᅜ㝿ཎᏊຊᶵ㛵㸦IAEA ࡢIGALL㸦International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned㸧࠿ࡽᚓࡽࢀࡓ▱ぢࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟཯ᫎࡍࡿ࡜࡜ࡶ࡟㸪つ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋ࣭㐠㌿⤒㦂ཪࡣ᭱᪂▱ぢࡢ཯ᫎ࡟࠶ࡓࡗ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࢆኚ᭦ཪࡣ㑅ᐃࡍࡿᚲせࡀ⏕ࡌࡓሙྜ㸪2015ᖺ∧ࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮࡟グ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓ⤒ࡓࠋ࣭㐠㌿⤒㦂ཪࡣ᭱᪂▱ぢࡢ཯ᫎ࡟࠶ࡓࡗ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࢆኚ᭦ཪࡣ㑅ᐃࡍࡿᚲせࡀ⏕ࡌࡓᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࢆኚ᭦ཪࡣ㑅ሙྜ㸪2015ᖺ∧ࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮࡟グ㍕ࡋ࡚࠸ࡓ⤒ᐃ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡟㸪ࡇࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࢆつ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋࡓࠋᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆ㐺⏝ࡋ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࢆኚ᭦ཪࡣ㑅࣭タィ࠿ࡽᗫṆࡲ࡛ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᇶᮏⓗ࡞⪃࠼᪉ࢆࡲ࡜ࡵ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧࡜ࡋ࡚᪂つ㏣ຍࡋࡓࠋ

ᐃ࡛ࡁࡿࡼ࠺࡟㸪ࡇࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࢆつ᱁໬ࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦つᐃ㸧࡜ࡋࡓࠋ࣭タィ࠿ࡽᗫṆࡲ࡛ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮࡟ࡘ࠸࡚㸪ᇶᮏⓗ࡞⪃࠼᪉ࢆࡲ࡜ࡵ࡚㸪⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࢆ㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧࡜ࡋ࡚᪂つ㏣ຍࡋࡓࠋ

AESJ-SC-P005㸸2021 ࡟ࡣ㸪ḟࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩ࡀ࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡣつᐃࡢ୍㒊࡛ࡣ࠶ࡾAESJ-SC-P005㸸2021 ࡟ࡣ㸪ḟࡢ㝃ᒓ᭩ࡀ࠶ࡾࡲࡍࠋࡓࡔࡋ㸪㝃ᒓ᭩㸦ཧ⪃㸧ࡣつᐃࡢ୍㒊࡛ࡣ࠶ࡾࡲࡏࢇࠋ㝃ᒓ᭩ A㸦ཧ⪃㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉ࡲࡏࢇࠋ㝃ᒓ᭩ B㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࡢ㑅ᐃ㝃ᒓ᭩ A㸦ཧ⪃㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢ⪃࠼᪉㝃ᒓ᭩ C㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮㝃ᒓ᭩ B㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢ≉ᛶ࡟ᛂࡌࡓ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮᪉ἲࡢ㑅ᐃ

ii

ii

誤

ṇ

㝃ᒓ᭩ D㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮஦㇟ࡢ≉ᐃ㝃ᒓ᭩ C㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬࣓࢝ࢽࢬ࣒ࡲ࡜ࡵ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮㝃ᒓ᭩ E㸦つᐃ㸧10 ᖺࡈ࡜ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ

㝃ᒓ᭩ D㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟୍ぴ⾲࡟ᇶ࡙ࡃ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮஦㇟ࡢ≉ᐃ㝃ᒓ᭩ F㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ

㝃ᒓ᭩ E㸦つᐃ㸧10 ᖺࡈ࡜ࡢ⤒ᖺຎ໬⟶⌮ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ

㝃ᒓ᭩ G㸦つᐃ㸧⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ

㝃ᒓ᭩ F㸦つᐃ㸧⤒ᖺຎ໬஦㇟ࡢホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ
㝃ᒓ᭩ G㸦つᐃ㸧⪏㟈Ᏻ඲ᛶホ౯ࡢᐇ᪋᪉ἲ

iii

iii

誤

ṇ

Foreword

Foreword

The “Code on Implementation and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management Programs 2021” was

The “Code on Implementation and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management Programs 2021” wasestablished by the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) through discussions in PLM Subcommittee followed

established by the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) through discussions in PLM Subcommittee followed

by deliberations in System Safety Technical Committee and then in Standards Committee. The Code sets forthby deliberations in System Safety Technical Committee and then in Standards Committee. The Code sets forth

the method for implementation of ageing management measures to be adopted by Japan’s electric utilities which

the method for implementation of ageing management measures to be adopted by Japan’s electric utilities which

are in charge of operation and management of light water reactor-type nuclear power plants.

are in charge of operation and management of light water reactor-type nuclear power plants.

For the purpose of this Code, ageing management of nuclear power plants means the implementation of

For the purpose of this Code, ageing management of nuclear power plants means the implementation ofactivities taking into consideration long-term plant operation through evaluation of the effects of ageing

activities taking into consideration long-term plant operation through evaluation of the effects of ageing

phenomena, which are expected to occur in structures, systems and components constituting a nuclear power

phenomena, which are expected to occur in structures, systems and components constituting a nuclear power

plant, on their safety functions.

plant, on their safety functions.

In order to ensure safe and stable operation, Japan’s nuclear power plants are subjected to regulatory inspections

In Japan,aelectric utilities carry out periodic inspections of their nuclear power plants by shutting down operation

conducted by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry in accordance with the Electricity Business Act (Itat regular intervals in order to ensure safe and stable operation of nuclear power plants. These inspections are

was decided in July 2013 that the Nuclear Regulation Authority would perform regulatory inspections according

intended to verify the consistency with the technical standards specified in the “Regulations on the Technicalto the “Act on the Regulation of Nuclear Source Material, Nuclear Fuel Material and Reactors”) and voluntaryStandards for Commercial Power Reactors and Associated Facilities (issued by the Nuclear Regulation

inspections implemented by electric utilities by shutting operation at regular intervals. These inspections are

Authority)”. At the same time the electric utilities are implementing the maintenance programs for plant

intended to verify the consistency with the technical standards specified in the ministerial ordinances andstructures, systems and components to confirm their integrity, maintain their intended safety functions andnotifications. At
A the same time the electric utilities are implementing the maintenance programs for plantmaintain and improve their reliability. In addition, while the plant is operating, the electric utilities carry out

structures, systems and components to confirm their integrity, maintain their intended safety functions andcondition monitoring, including trend monitoring, plant walkdowns and surveillance tests, to identify abnormal

maintain and improve their reliability. In addition, while the plant is operating, the electric utilities carry out

indications of plant structures, systems and components.

condition monitoring, including trend monitoring, plant walkdowns and surveillance tests, to identify abnormal
indications of plant structures, systems and components.

The original version of Code on Implementation and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management
Programs was issued in March 2007. The original version set forth the method of implementing ageing

The original version of Code on Implementation and Review of Nuclear Power Plant Ageing Management

management measures for plants operating more than 30 years. Drafting the revised version started immediately

Programs was issued in March 2007. The original version set forth the method of implementing ageing

after issuance of the original Code in conjunction with the work toward establishment of a new inspection systemmanagement measures for plants operating more than 30 years. Drafting the revised version started immediately

for nuclear power plants. This new version of the Code specifies the details of ageing management measures toafter issuance of the original Code in conjunction with the work toward establishment of a new inspection system

be taken from the early stage of operation, when the plant marks its 10th and 20th year of operation, and enhances

for nuclear power plants. This new version of the Code specifies the details of ageing management measures toageing management measures to be implemented every 10 years after a plant marks its 30th year of operation.

thth

be taken from the early stage of operation, when the plant marks its 10 and 20 year of operation, and enhances
ageing management measures to be implemented every 10 years after a plant marks its 30th year of operation.

AESJ-SC-P005:2008 which was issued in February 2009 includes major changes. First, the definition of ageing
management measures was reviewed and maintenance activities to be conducted to address ageing phenomena

AESJ-SC-P005:2008 which was issued in February 2009 includes major changes. First, the definition of ageing

were identified according to the number of operating years to determine the details of an ageing management

management measures was reviewed and maintenance activities to be conducted to address ageing phenomena

program in conjunction with the maintenance program. In addition, “summary sheet of ageing phenomena” waswere identified according to the number of operating years to determine the details of an ageing management

formulated showing expected ageing phenomena according to nuclear power plant component based onprogram in conjunction with the maintenance program. In addition, “summary sheet of ageing phenomena” wasknowledge obtained by nuclear power plants which had implemented a plant life management technicalformulated showing expected ageing phenomena according to nuclear power plant component based on

evaluation. The summary sheet of ageing phenomena is attached to this Code as a regulatory requirement andknowledge obtained by nuclear power plants which had implemented a plant life management technicalthis Code requires electric utilities to perform ageing management from the early stage of plant operation

evaluation. The summary sheet of ageing phenomena is attached to this Code as a regulatory requirement andaccording to the summary sheet of ageing phenomena. This Code also includes another attachment which

this Code requires electric utilities to perform ageing management from the early stage of plant operation

identifies the ageing management measures to be taken when a plant marks its 10th and 20th year of operation and

iv

iv

ṇ

誤

according to the summary sheet of ageing phenomena. This Code also includes another attachment which

enhances ageing management measures to be implemented every 10 years after the plant marks its 30th year ofidentifies the ageing management measures to be taken when a plant marks its 10th and 20th year of operation andoperation by specifying the standardized methods for evaluation of individual ageing phenomena.

enhances ageing management measures to be implemented every 10 years after the plant marks its 30th year ofoperation by specifying the standardized methods for evaluation of individual ageing phenomena.

The summary sheet of ageing phenomena in AESJ-SC-P005: 2010 (Amendment 1), 2011 (Amendment 2) and2012 (Amendment 3) include the results of ageing management technical evaluation for the 8 units (i.e., Tsuruga-

The summary sheet of ageing phenomena in AESJ-SC-P005: 2010 (Amendment 1), 2011 (Amendment 2) and1, Fukushima Daiichi-4, 6, Hamaoka-2, Tokai Daini, Mihama-1 and Ohi-1, 2) as the latest knowledge, which2012 (Amendment 3) include the results of ageing management technical evaluation for the 8 units (i.e., Tsuruga-

were described in the reports submitted to Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan from November 2007 to the end

1, Fukushima Daiichi-4, 6, Hamaoka-2, Tokai Daini, Mihama-1 and Ohi-1, 2) as the latest knowledge, whichof October, 2010.

were described in the reports submitted to Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan from November 2007 to the end

AESJ-SC-P005:2015 includes the following major changes:of October, 2010.

࣭ Incorporating the “Regulatory Guide for the Implementation of Ageing Management Program for
AESJ-SC-P005:2015 includes the following major changes:࣭6, 2013) and lessons learned from the Great East Japan Earthquake, the scope of components subject to theCommercial Nuclear Power Generation Facilities” (issued by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, December

evaluation and the evaluation period were reviewed and modified, and descriptions about technical

6, 2013) and lessons learned from the Great East Japan Earthquake, the scope of components subject to theevaluation of plants in a long-term shutdown state, tsunami safety evaluation and evaluation of theevaluation and the evaluation period were reviewed and modified, and descriptions about technicalevaluation of plants in a long-term shutdown state, tsunami safety evaluation and evaluation of theeffectiveness of the Assessment of ageing management measures were added.
࣭࣭The findings obtained from the International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) were incorporated

effectiveness of the Assessment of ageing management measures were added.
࣭ The findings obtained from the International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) were incorporatedo Attachment (Reference) “List of Ageing Phenomena”.
into࣭ Attachment (Provisions) “Methods for Implementing Technical Evaluation of Ageing Phenomena” andintoo Attachment E (Reference) “List of Ageing Phenomena”.

Attachment (Provisions) “Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation” were modified

Attachment C (Provisions) ““Methods for Implementing Technical Evaluation of Ageing Phenomena” andincorporating the latest knowledge.

Attachment D (Provisions) “Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation” were modified࣭Commercial Nuclear Power Generation Facilities” (issued by the Nuclear Regulation Authority, December

Incorporating the “Regulatory Guide for the Implementation of Ageing Management Program for(Provisions) was revised to include the࣭ The summary sheet of ageing phenomena included in Attachmentt (Provisions)

incorporating the latest knowledge.

results of ageing management technical evaluation for the 5 units (i.e., Fukushima Daiichi-1, Fukushima

The summary sheet of ageing phenomena included in(Provisions)
was revised to include then Attachment A (Provisions) w

Daini-1, Genkai-2, Ikata-2 and Mihama-2) as the latest knowledge, which were described in the reports

results of ageing management technical evaluation for the 5 units (i.e., Fukushima Daiichi-1, Fukushima

submitted to Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan from November 2010 to the end of October, 2012. In

Daini-1, Genkai-2, Ikata-2 and Mihama-2) as the latest knowledge, which were described in the reports

addition, the combinations of component portions and ageing phenomena, which should be subject tosubmitted to Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan from November 2010 to the end of October, 2012. In

seismic safety evaluations taking into account aging phenomena, were identified in the Summary Sheet of

addition, the combinations of component portions and ageing phenomena, which should be subject toAgeing Phenomena for each plant component based on the knowledge obtained by nuclear power plants

seismic safety evaluations taking into account aging phenomena, were identified in the Summary Sheet ofwhich had implemented a plant life management technical evaluation.

Ageing Phenomena for each plant component based on the knowledge obtained by nuclear power plants
which had implemented a plant life management technical evaluation.

The summary sheet of ageing phenomena in AESJ-SC-P005: 2016 (Amendment 1) , 2017 (Amendment 2),
2018 (Amendment 3) and 2019 (Amendment 4) include the results of ageing management technical evaluation

The summary sheet of ageing phenomena in AESJ-SC-P005: 2016 (Amendment 1) , 2017 (Amendment 2),

for the 18 units (i.e., Tsuruga-2, Fukushima Daini-2, 3, 4, Shimane-1, Hamaoka-3, Onagawa-1, Kashiwazaki2018 (Amendment 3) and 2019 (Amendment 4) include the results of ageing management technical evaluation

Kariwa-1, Mihama-3, Takahama-1,2 (including evaluation of the cold shutdown condition), Takahama-3, 4,

for the 18 units (i.e., Tsuruga-2, Fukushima Daini-2, 3, 4, Shimane-1, Hamaoka-3, Onagawa-1, Kashiwazaki

Genkai-1 and Sendai-1, 2) as the latest knowledge, which were completed the examination by Japanese

Kariwa-1, Mihama-3, Takahama-1,2 (including evaluation of the cold shutdown condition), Takahama-3, 4,

Government from November 2013 to the end of October, 2017.

Genkai-1 and Sendai-1, 2) as the latest knowledge, which were completed the examination by Japanese
Government from November 2013 to the end of October, 2017.

AESJ-SC-P005:2021 includes the following major changes:
࣭ The scope of studies for feedback of latest findings and knowledge and operating experience was modified.

AESJ-SC-P005:2021 includes the following major changes:v࣭ Attachment (Provisions) “Method for Implementing Ageing Management Program every Ten years”,
v

ṇ

誤

Attachment (Provisions) “Methods for Implementing Technical Evaluation of Ageing Phenomena” and࣭

The scope of studies for feedback of latest findings and knowledge and operating experience was modified.

࣭

Attachment B (Provisions) ““Method for Implementing Ageing Management Program every Ten years”,

Attachment (Provisions) “Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation” were modified

Attachment C (Provisions) ““Methods for Implementing Technical Evaluation of Ageing Phenomena” andincorporating the latest knowledge.

Attachment D (Provisions) “Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation” were modified
incorporating the latest knowledge.
࣭࣭ The findings obtained from the International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) were incorporated
into
o Attachment (Reference) “List of Ageing Phenomena”, and the Attachment was modified as provisions.

The findings obtained from the International Generic Ageing Lessons Learned (IGALL) were incorporated

࣭ Attachment (Reference) “Philosophy for Ageing Management Based on Ageing Phenomenon

into Attachment E (Reference) ““List of Ageing Phenomena”, and the Attachment was modified as

Characteristics” to AESJ-SC-P005:2015 was specified as Attachment (Provisions) in this Code so that theprovisions.

philosophy for ageing management based on ageing phenomenon characteristics can be applied to changeor select the aging management method when it becomes necessary to change or select aging management

AESJ-SC-P005:2021 includes following Attachments, but the Attachments E and F (Reference) aare not an
integral part of the provisions.

methods in incorporating operating experience or the latest knowledge.
࣭ The basic concept of ageing management from design to decommissioning of a nuclear power plant wassummarized and newly added as Attachment (Reference).

Attachment A (Reference): Philosophy for Ageing Management fromthe early stage of operationf
Attachment B (Provisions): Selection of Ageing Management Based on Ageing Phenomenon Characteristics

AESJ-SC-P005:2021 includes following Attachments, but thee Attachments (Reference) are not an integral part

Attachment C (Provisions): Ageing Management According to Summary Sheet of Ageing Phenomenaof the provisions.

Attachment D (Provisions): Identification of Ageing Phenomena According to List of Ageing Phenomena
Attachment E (Provisions): Method for Implementing Ageing Management Program every Ten years

Attachment A (Reference): Philosophy for Ageing Management

Attachment F (Provisions): Methods for Implementingg Technical E
Evaluation of Ageing Phenomena

Attachment B (Provisions): Selection of Ageing Management Based on Ageing Phenomenon Characteristics

Attachment G (Provisions): Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation

Attachment C (Provisions): Ageing Management According to Summary Sheet of Ageing Phenomena
Attachment D (Provisions): Identification of Ageing Phenomena According to List of Ageing Phenomena
Attachment E (Provisions): Method for Implementing Ageing Management Program every Ten years
Attachment F (Provisions): Methods for Implementing Evaluation of Ageing Phenomenaไᐃ㸸2021 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 1 ᪥ࡇࡢᐇ᪋ᇶ‽࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢពぢཪࡣ㉁ၥࡣ㸪୍⯡♫ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍஦ົᒁᶆ‽ጤဨ఍ᢸᙜ
(ࠛ105-0004 ᮾி㒔Attachment G (Provisions): Method for Implementing Seismic Safety Evaluation

༊᪂ᶫ 2-3-7 TEL 03-3508-1263) ࡟ࡈ㐃⤡ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ

ไᐃ㸸2021 ᖺ 9 ᭶ 1 ᪥ࡇࡢᐇ᪋ᇶ‽࡟ࡘ࠸࡚ࡢពぢཪࡣ㉁ၥࡣ㸪୍⯡♫ᅋἲே ᪥ᮏཎᏊຊᏛ఍஦ົᒁᶆ‽ጤဨ఍ᢸᙜ
(ࠛ105-0004 ᮾி㒔vi༊᪂ᶫ 2-3-7 TEL 03-3508-1263) ࡟ࡈ㐃⤡ࡃࡔࡉ࠸ࠋ

vi