THE VARIATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PELAGE
OF THE RIBBON SEAL WITH REFERENCE
TO THE SYSTEMATICSY ASUHIKO NAITO
Koninato Marine Biological Laboratory, Tokyo Universityof Fisheries, Amatsu-Kominato, Chiba

AND
MASA YUKI OSHIMA
Kamogawa Sea World, Kamogawa, Chiba

ABSTRACT

More than four hundreds pelages of the ribbon seal (Histriophoca
fascita) were examined to know the development of the patterns andtheir variation. To describe them, some terminology were devised. The
formations of these bands pattern were closely related to the pigmentation. Concerning to the pigmentation, two types of the pigmentation
were found such as basic pigmentation and secondary pigmentation.
The former pigmentation was found in both ·sexes of all ages except
pups (not white coat pups), and the later pigmentation was found in
adult males and in some females. However, some adult males did notshow secondary pigmentation exceptionary. From these formations of
the pigmentation, the ancestral form of the ribbon seal was speculated.
The small ringed pattern was also found, and systematic reverse or
atavism was considered and discussed.

INTRODUCTION

The ribbon seal (Histriophoca fascita) is generally known for its ribbon mark.
Their color pattern is much characterized by sex. The ribbon seal and harp
seal are the only seals with banded pelage, and in these seals the color pattern
has not been discussed and argured while the sexual dimorphism seen inpolygamous form has been well noted from the point view of social biology,
evolution and so on. In general, however, divergence in the pinnipeds frommeaning of adaptation occurs in many directions. The less arguments anddiscussions on the color pattern of the ribbon seal may due to the less knowledge
on this seal. When we consider the problems on color patterns, we have quite
small knowledges on their distribution, movements, breeding, social behaviour
and etc. Yet, it is still necessary to discribe the color pattern itself for the sakeof future study of adaptation, evolution and systematics on this seal. The present
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976, 187-197.

188

NAITO AND OSHIMA

paper is written to introduce the color pattern itself of the ribbon seal, andvariations are described with some new findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODSAll pelages of the ribbon seal dealt in the present study were collected fromthe area along the Sakhalin (south to 50°N) in the Sea of Okhotsk from the
mid to the end of May 1975. The pelages of these seals were stocked in the
fur companies after they were tentatively tanned. The authors had a chance
to examine the pelages in October 1975 at Engaru Fur Company and Hakodate
Fur Company. The pelages were recorded by photo to examine. The pelages
size were measured from the nose tip to the root of the tail. The measurements,
however, were sometimes rough because the pelages were broken in the measuring points. The sexes were also recorded by examing the genital openings(penis openings in males and teats openings in females). The total numbers
examined in this study were 472 pelages (280 males and 192 females).

1.

The formation of the ribbon pattern
It is widely known that the adult male ribbon seal has the characteristic
white bands on their head to neck part, lateral body sides and lumber partwhich are so-called ribbon pattern. These white bands are also found in adultfemales, yet they are not so distinct. It is also generally recognized that thesewhite bands are not seen in both sexes of young seals. Concerning the revelation of these bands, however, it is still uncertain when and how these bands
are formed.
According to the Tikhomirov (1966), during the time from the moulting of
the lanugo coat to the first moulting the seals have no pattern showing darkgrey color in the dorsal side and bright grey in the belly side. After the firstmoulting at one year old they begin to show the distinct shield shaped pattern
against the darker grey back, however there found no sexual dimorphism in thecolor pattern. After the second moulting at 2 years old, they first begin toshow the peculiar ribbon pattern in males, and sexual dimorphism was foundin the color pattern. The seals show the full adult type ribbon mark in males
at 3 years old.
In our pelage study, we failed to get age informations from canine teeth,
however, we got almost same results as Tikhomirov (1966) attained. As shown
Table 1 and Plate I, all pelages were easily classified into four categories inmales and three in females such as stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage
IV in males by the developmental stages of the pattern, and each stages ofboth sexes well corresponded with the results by Tikhomirov (1966). The sealsof both sexes of stage I have no ribbon pattern but showed grey or brownish
grey back and creamy white or brownish yellow bellies. The seals of thisstage were identified to be pups by the sealers and the pelage process workers.
Actually these pelages corresponded with the pelages of 0 year old described
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

PELAGE PATTERN OF RIBBON SEAL

189

TABLE 1. PELAGE MATERIALS USED IN THIS STUDY. ALL PELAGES WERE
CLASSIFIED IN EACH 10 CM BY THE LENGTH, AND THE DEVELOPMENTAL
STAGES OF PELAGE PATTERN WERE EXAMINED. NUMBERS
IN PARENTHESIS SHOW PERCENTAGE OF
EACH STAGE IN EACH CLASS.
Class of pelage
size in cm

Numbers
stage I

Developmental stage of patternstage IIstage IIIstage IVMales

110-120120-130130-140140-150
150-160
160-170
170-180
180-190
190-200

2
10
31
35
63
75
55
7
2

2 (100.0)
9 ( 90.0)
10 ( 32.2)
5 ( 14.3)
I ( 1. 6)

280

27

6
12
28
17

6 (100. 0)
10 ( 83.3)
6 ( 21. 4)
2 ( 11.8)
I ( 2.2)

1 (10)

1 ( 1. 3)

2 ( 6.4)
17 ( 48.6)
58 ( 92.0)
73 ( 97.4)
55 (100 )
7 (100 )
2 (100 )

29

10

214

2 (16.7)
20 (71. 4)
9 (52.9)22 (48.9)

2 ( 7. I)
6 ( 35.3)
22 ( 48.9)

19 (30.2)
3 (16. 7)
l (33.3)

44 ( 69.8)
15 ( 83. 3)
2 ( 66. 7)

7691

16 (51. 6)

3 ( 9. 7)

II (31. 4)

2 ( 5. 7)
3 ( 4.8)

I ( 1. 6)
I ( 1. 3)

Females110-120120-130130-140140-150
150-160
160-170
170-180
180-190

45
63
18
3
192

25

by Tikhomirov (1966). From above the seals of stage I were supposed to be 0
year old. The seals of stage II still showed the same pattern between two sexes.
They begin to show the peculiar shield pattern with narrow white line at its
margin, and at the same time the initial pup dorsal dark color were still found.
These seals of this stage were also estimated to be 1 year old by the sealers andthe pelage process workers, and also the comparison with the results by Tikhomirov ( 1966) suggested these seals to be 1 year old. In stage III seals begin toshow the sexual dimorphism. Being incomplete, male seal pelages of this stage
showed the ribbon pattern with obscured ·white bands. These pelages did
not show as strong contrast as seen in full adult type pelages as over all
look, and shield pattern had developed extending four feet towards the belly
side to connect each other from both sides making the ring patterns at eachlateral sides. The margin of this developed shield pattern were relatively clear.
On the contrary, the other margin of white bands were unclear, so that the
ribbon pattern did not appear clearly at this stage. This may due to the time
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

190

NAITO AND OSHIMA

duration of pigmentation between four feeted dorsal pigmentation (developed
shield pattern) and other pigmentation, and also due to decolorization in whitebands parts. As a matter of facts in this stage unclear radial thin dark lines
were found in the white bands. In this stage initial pup dorsal dark color
which were found in stages I and II were already lost. Concerning the age ofthis stage, the sealers and the pelage process workers do not classify the pelages
by age, however, seals of this stage were supposed to be 2 years old in accordance with pelages of 2 years old seals described by Tikhomirov (1966). Pelage
pattern of female seals of stage III were apparently different from these ofmales. Wide variation being found, seals generally showed indistinct ribbon
pattern. The pigmentations did not develop as strongly as males of samestage. The peculiar shield pattern which were always found in stage II usuallychanged to have extended four feet. Over all look, however, was very bright,
for the pigmentations at lateral body side and hip parts were dim. The
decolorization at white bands developed to vanish the initial pup dorsal
dark color which was still found at stage II. The ages of female seals of thisstage III were supposed to be over 2 years old. Only in males stage IV waspossibly classified. Seals of this stage showed complete adult type ribbon
pattern. The ages of seals of this stage were supposed to be over 3 years old.
As already described, we do not have any age informations from the canine
teeth in this study, yet we could know the formation of .the ribbon pattern by
the age in accordance with the results by Tikhomirov (1966). However it isconsidered that age variation may occur in the formation of the ribbon pattern.
To make this problem much surer, we studied on the captured ribbon seals.
Kamogawa Sea World well succeeded in keeping a male and a female ribbon
seals. A male and a female pups were kept from 1973 and 1974 respectively.
This male seal developed his pattern showing the same stages as describedabove after each moulting in May, and showed complete ribbon pattern of the
final stage in this study at age 3 years old. On the other hand a female seal
showed the same pattern as stages I and II at age 0 and 1. However, she had
died at age I year old in 1974. From above all, stages I, II, III and IV wellcorresponded to the age 0, 1, 2, and over 3 years old in males, and stages I, II.
III also to the age 0, 1, and over 2 years old in females.

Analysis f rorn schernatic diagrarn
As mentioned above, the ribbon pattern was formed age by age
showing the peculiar age classes such as stages I, II, III, IV in males andstages I, II, III in females. We already described when these pattern appear,
however, we still do not know how they appear. To analize this problem, we
made some schematic diagrams in each sex, and for the explanation conveniencesome terminology were used. Farther more in the former chapter, we usedstage classes such as stages I, II, III, IV for the convenience, however, eachstage corresponded to age classes such as 0 year old, 1 year old, 2 years old
and over 3 years old respectively over all. Therefore we use age classes instead

2.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

PELAGE PATTERN OF RIBBON SEAL

191

of stage classes m this chapter and later chapters.
Male
Plate II shows the schematic peculiar pattern of each age classes, this plate
also shows the degrees of pigmentation. Seals of 0 year old have their dorsal
pattern ·which are named pup pattern (P. P.). At age one, the darker shieldpattern (S. P.) appears in the center part of pup pattern, and at the same time
decolorization occurs at the margin of shield pattern. As a result pup pattern
are divided into four pattern such as initial neck pattern (I. N. P.), initial
lateral patterns (I. L. P.) and initial hip pattern (I. H.P.). The pigmentations ofthese patterns are same degree as pup pattern at age 0. The pigmentation anddecolorization develop quickly at age 2. The basic shield pattern developed
having four feet which connect each other to make round circle at lateral side.
This developed shield pattern (D.S. P.) is almost real black. The same degreeof pigmentation appears in the head and neck parts forming the neck pattern(N. P.) which took place the initial neck pattern (I. N. P.). The decolorization
at the outer margin of developed shield pattern occurs as fast as pigmentation
forming the neck band (N. B.), lateral bands (La. B.) and lumber band (Lu. B.),so that the initial lateral pattern at age 0 do not appear at age 2. At the sametime, however, the lesser new pigmentation begin to occur innerpart of thelateral bands and at hip part forming the lateral pattern (L. P.) and the hippattern (H.P.). The developemental stage of pigmentation and the decolorization attains the final stage at age 3. The neck pattern and the developed
shield pattern come to much more black, and the delayed pigmentation of thelateral pattern and the hip pattern develop to come as black as the pigmentation of other patterns. At the same time each bands appears whiter by thedeveloped decolorization.
As mentioned above, we could find out that time duration of the pigmentation and the decolorization exist in forming the so-called ribbon pattern, andfurthermore we can classify the pigmentation of each pattern by their developmental stages, while the decolorization of each bands is impossible to classify
because of their same developemental stage. Fig. 1 shows this pigmentation
stage of each pattern. The pigmentation of pup pattern is decreasing andtook over by other pigmentation or disappear. We call this as the degenerative
pigmentation. The pigmentation of the shield pattern is very stable and very
actively increase, and the neck pattern pigmentation is relatively stable andincreasing. These pigmentations are classified as the basic pigmentation. The
latest pigmentations of the lateral pattern and the hip pattern are not stable, forthese are much variable (explained in the later chapter). These are classified
as the secondary pigmentation.
FemalePlate III shows the schematic diagrams of pattern of each age class in females.
As shown in Plates II and III, females show the quite same pattern and the same
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

NAITO AND OSHIMA

192

degrees of pigmentation and decolorization as males at age 0 and 1. At age 0
they possess the pup pattern, and at age I the shield pattern, initial neckpattern, lateral patterns and initial hip pattern appear as well. At age 2, theshield pattern develop its four feet at each corner making the round circles
at lateral sides. This developed shield pattern is quite same as males not in
the degrees of pigmentation but in form. The neck pattern, the lateral pattern,
and the hip pattern also appear at this age, while the pigmentation of thesepattern also not so strong as males. These pattern and pigmentation do not seemto change over 2 years old. Compared with males, overall look of female
seems to be quite bright and no pattern seems to exist in females at firstglance. However, these are due to the less pigmentation in females. They
actually possess the each same pattern as males. These pigmentation stage ofeach pattern are also shown in Fig. I. Concerning to the sexual dimorphism, it
is generally believed that the male ribbon seal shows distinct ribbon pattern
and the female seal does not show it. As already mentioned above, it was
revealed that the sexual dimorphism are found not in the pattern itself but inthe degrees of the pigmentation of the pattern. As seen in Fig. I and Plates
II and III, the sexual dimorphism occurs after 2 years old, and completion ofdimorphism is found at age 3. Probably, these are closely related to the sexual
maturation. We do not know the age of sexual maturation of the ribbon seal.
According to Tikhomirov (1966), however, it seems to mature after age 2 and3 in fem ales and males.
ages

0

1

P.P

+

+
++

S,P.
Male

D.S.P.
N.P.
La.P.
H.P.
P.P.
S.P.

FemaleD.S.P.
N.P.
La.P.
H.P.

+

+
++

2

3

degenerative pigmentation

+++
+++
+++
++
++

+++
+++
+++
+++
+++

++
+
+
+
+

++
+
+
+
+

basic pigmentation

secondary pigmentation

degenerative pigmentation
basic pigmentation

secondary pigmentation

Fig. I. Development of the pigmentation of each pattern. Plus simbols show thedegree of the pigmentation. Abbreviation shows as follows. P.P., Pup Pattern;
S. P ., Shield Pattern; D.S. P., Developed Shield pattern; N. P., Neck Pattern; La. P.,
Lateral Pattern; H.P., Hip Pattern.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

193

PELAGE PATTERN OF RIBBON SEAL3.

The variations of bands, pig1nentations and other charactor
As already introduced, three types of distinct white bands are seen on the
pelage such as head band and two lateral bands which encircle the fore flippers,
and lumber band. Of all three type bands, head band showed the least variation. This band circulate the neck and the throat slightly prolonged anterior
at the head, so that it shows the chevron when we saw the tanned sheet ofpelage (Plate V). Being slight variation in this band, these are no individuals
in our materials which never form the chevron. The lateral bands which form
the large ringed patterns in the sheet of tanned pelages show much more variation than the head band. Some variation being found in the size of the ringitself and width of the band as well, and rather wide variations were found in
the connection or the combination to other bands. Concerning to the way ofconnection three basic types were derived such as type 1, no connection to otherbands; type 2, connection with lumber band (including the case of one sideband connecting to the lumber band); type 3, connection to both head bandand lumber band (including the case of one side band connecting to other band
(Plate IV). The appearance frequency of each type were shown in Table 2.
Type 1 is the most popular with 51.7% frequency, and 34.4% for type 2 and13.9% for type 3 respectively. However, there seemed no pelages which showed
the connection between the lateral bands and the head band. It also seemedthat each lateral band never connect at dorsal side while they usually connect
at belly side. The widest variation was apparently found in the lumber band.
The variation found in this band was so much wide that it seemed quite difficult to describe or classify into some categories precisely. For the convieniencein this study the lumber band variations were only shown in Plate V showing
from simple form to complicated form.
The variation seen in the bands was described already from the understanding that these bands are peculiarly specialized in this species. The patternof these bands, however, have never been interpreted from the point of viewof its origin, for these white bands are too much distinct and attractive todraw the attention to the dark pigmented counter pattern against the whitebands. The darker the pigmented counter parts the more remarkably the whitebands appears. On the other hand, the less pigmentation makes the bands be
TABLE 2. APPEARANCE FREQUENCY OF EACH VARIATION TYPE OF
THE LUMBER BANDS. NUMBERS IN PARENTHESIS SHOW THE
NUMBER OF CASES THAT ONE SIDE OF TWO LUMBER
BANDS CONNECTED TO OTER BANDS.
Type

Numbers

Type I.
Type 2.

108 ( 0)72 (18)51. 7Type 3.

29 ( 9)

Total

209

13.9
100

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

0/

/0

34.4

194

NAITO AND OSHIMA

more obscure. In the present study such above mentioned obscure bands were
found. As shown Plate VI, the less pigmentation were found in the lateralpattern and the hip pattern. We found six examples of this less pigmentation
pelages out of 214 pelages of over 3 years old male seals, and the frequency
was 2.8%. These less pigmentations make the lateral bands and lumber band
obscure as if those bands do not exist. On the other hand the pigmentation
at the neck pattern and the developed shield pattern were very strong andstable, and such less pigmentation were not found. This may relate to the lessvariation of the head band mentioned already. The less pigmentations inlateral parts and hip parts may relate to wider variation of the lateral bands
and the lumber band already mentioned. With regards to the female pattern,
the contrast being obscure, female shows the distinct dorsal pigmentation which
form the same developed shield pattern as the males, while the pigmentationin the lateral pattern and hip pattern are not strong as much as in the developed shield pattern. Therefore in the females no lateral bands and lumber
bands were often found. From above as already mentioned in the former
chapter, the pigmentation of the ribbon seal were possibly classified into twostages from the phylogenetic aspects, basic pigmentation and secondary pigmentation, indicating speculately that the ribbon seal in its ancestral form had thepigmentation in smaller area such face-head parts and shoulder-dorsal parts
showing the brighter phase as over all look (Plate VII), and secondary pigmentation had occurred in the lateral and hip parts resulted the formation of
the peculiar bands so-called ribbon marks. Of course sexual dimorphism by
the pigmentation degrees might existed even if it was not distinct as much as
today's ribbon seal.
The variation of the bands and pigmentation were described above, and theformation of the ribbon pattern were explained. In the present study farther
variation were found. As shown Plate VI, the small ringed pattern or spotted
pattern was found in some of pelages. The appearance frequency was as shownin Table 3. According to the numbers of rings or spotted patterns they wereclassified into three degrees. Males showed higher frequency (8.8%) and infemales these patterns are not distinct and they showed lower frequency (5.6% ).
This difference between sexes may due to that these small white ringed orspotted patterns are embossed against darker pelages of males and are easilyfound. This ringed or spotted patterns well resembles to those of the harbour
seal (Phoca vitulina; both ice-breeding and land-breeding types) which werementioned Belkin et al. (1969), and Naito (1973). On these ringed pattern of theharbour seal, McLaren (1966) pointed out to be atavism related to the ringed
seal. In this study it is quite difficult to deny that these small ringed patterns
are nothing but the only simple variation, because they appeared pretty highfrequency (8.8%) in adult males. The present stage of study on this problem
cannot settle the arguments, however, this fingding in the ribbon seal may
support that these small ringed patterns are the pretty stable systematic or
phylogenitic character which appears in some taxonimic groups.
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

PELAGE PATTERN OF RIBBON SEAL

195

TABLE 3. APPEARANCE FREQUENCY OF THE PELAGES ON WHICH
THE SMALL RINGED OR SPOTTED PATTERN \VAS OBSERVED.
THE PELAGES WERE CLASSIFIED INTO THREE DEGREESBY NUMBERS OF THE RINGS AND SPOTS.
Males

Females

Total

Numerous202Medium

4

0

4

Rare

14

Total

20

5
5

25

Numbers examined

226

90

316

Total ratio for examined numbers

8.8%

5.6%

19

7.9%

DISCUSSION

The pelage color pattern of the ribbon seal were studied, and revelation of thecolor pattern according to ages, sexual difference, the bands variation, theformation of the bands, and the small ringed patterns were examined as systematiccharacter.
Concerning to the sexual segregation in the pinnipeds, the divergenceoccurred in many ways. The remarkable sexual segregation are well known in
the land-breeding polygamous seals such as the fur seals, the elephant seals andetc. In these seals, sexual dimorphism seen in body size, size of canine teeth
and etc. seem to be derived from the possession of territory and mating females
through the struggles between males. On the contrary sexual dimorphism seenin the pelage pattern are only found in the ribbon seal and harp seal. The
ribbon seal occurs in the unstable dispersed pack ice area in the breeding seaon(Burns, 1970; Fay, 1972). This seal dose not aggregate but appears alone on
the ice floes. Each individual occupies each ice floe (Naito, unpublished).
Therefore these remarkable pelage pattern may have some effects to increase achance to mate, or may effect on females as display from a distance even on
ice floes or darker under water where the surface is covered by ice floes. The
breeding behaviours of this seal, however, are not known at the present stage of
our study, therefore explanation on some significance of this pelage pattern
seemed to be quite difficult from the aspects of breeding or scocial behaviour.
As to phylogenic problems, some findings were made in the present study.
The peculiar pelage pattern of this seal were formed by the two stages ofpigmentation such as the basic pigmentation and the secondary pigmentation.
The basic pigmentation was found in all of adult males and females even in
immature seals of both sexes, and the secondary pigmentation was not always
occurred in some adult females and even in some of adult males. When we
consider that the secondary pigmentation are the acquired character in theirpathway of evolution, it is supposedly considered that the ancestral form of theribbon seal would not have the lateral and lumber bands pattern, but showeddark patterns around the face and shoulder-dorsal area against the bright groundSci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

196

NAITO AND OSHIMA

color. This speculated ancestral form would much resemblance to the harp seal
in the Atlantic, because this seal shows smaller pigmentation parts and brighter
color over all. However, to attain some conclusion on the relation between the
ribbon seal and the harp seal, it is essential to examine the variation of thepelage pattern of the harp seal as well as the ribbon seal.
The small ringed patterns were also found in this study, and estimated tohave some systematic characters. This may support the hypothesis that ringed
patterns occur as atavism (McLaren, 1966). Burns and Fay (1970) showed thesystematic relationship among the four smaller seals of the tribe Phocini (Histriophaca, Pagophilils, Phoca, Pnsa) by the osteological study. They indicatedthe stronger interrelationship between Histriophoca and Pagophilus, and alsosuggested the stronger interrelationships between Pagophilus and Pusa-Phoca
group than those between Histriophoca and Pusa-Phoca group. From above
relationships we can expect to find the some ringed patterns from the harp seal,
too.
ACKNOWLEDG MENTThis work were performed by examing the larger number of pelages, andwe are very much indebted to Mr. Y. Suzuki, the president of Engaru Far
Company and Mr. Kodama, the Hakodate Fur Company. ·They were kindly
permitted us to examine and take photographs their pelages. We also would
like extend our sincere thanks to them for their kindness to permitted us to
use their facilities.
REFERENCES
BELKIN, A. N., G. M. KOSYGIN, and K. I. PANIN, 1969. Marine mammals. Academy of
Scsences of U.S. S. R., Ministry of Fisheries of U.S. S. R., Moscow., 157-175.
BURNS, J. ]., 1970. Remarked on the distribution and natural history of pogophilic Pinnipeds
in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. ]. Mamm., 51(3): 445-454.
BURNS, J. ]., and F. H. FAY, 1970. Comparative morphology of the skull of the ribbon seal,
Historiophoca fasciata,with remarks on systematics of Phocidae. ]. Zoo!., 161: 363-394.
FAY, F. H., 1972. Tne role of ice in the ecology of marine mammals of the Bering Sea. International Symposium for Bering Sea Study. Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan.
MCLAREN, I. A., 1966. Taxonomy of the harbor seals of the western North Pacific and evolution of certain other hair seals. ]. Mamm., 47(3): 466-473.
NAITO, Y., 1973. Comparison in colour pattern of two species of harbour seal in adjacentwaters of Hokkaido. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst. 25: 401-310.
SCHEFFER, V. B., 1958. Seals, sea lions and waluses. Stanford University Press, Stanford,
179pp.
T!KHOMIROV, E. A., 1966. The formation and variation of the pelage pattern of the ribbon
seal. Pacific Sci. Inst. of Fisheries and Oceanography 108: 239-241.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

PELAGE PATTERN OF RIBBON SEALEXPLANATION OF THE PLATESPLATE IThe developmental stages of the color pattern. From top stage I (pup), stage II(1 year old), stage III (2 years old), stage IV (3 years old). Left, males; right,
females.
PLATE II
The schematic diagrams of male pelage pattern.
year old, 2 years old and 3 years old.

From top to below 0 year old, 1

PLATE IIIThe schematic diagrams of female pelage patterns.
and 2 years old.

From top 0 year old, 1 year old

PLATE IV
The variation of lateral bands. From top, Type I (no connection to other bands),
Type 2 (connection to lumber band), Type 3 (connection to both lumber and headbands).
PLATE VThe variation of the lumber band. Arranged from simple form to more complicatedform from left top to right bottom.
PLATE VI
Examples of adult males which did not show the complete secondary pigmentation.
PLATE VII
The schematic diagrams of the speculated ancestral form, which were devised fromthe developemtal process of the pigmentation.
PLATE VIII
The examples of the small ringed or spotted patterns. The pelages were classified
into three degrees A, B and C according to the numbers of ringed patterns.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976.

197

9L6l '
8
l ・oN

・
i
s
u
r・
saus
a
7
v
1
1
1
1
1・
t
f
a
u・
口S

6

，

‑t
，.ー

‑
‑

ノ・

Vl
〜IHSO ONV O..LIVN

13ムV寸dPLATE II
NAITO AND OSHIMA

P.P.

1. H.P.

I. N.P.

La.P.

N.P.

H.P.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976

NAITO AND OSHIMA

PLATE III

S.P.

I.NP.

.·.•:;:::;::}f{fjf}:};j;:;:::.:.
I. L.P.

La.P.

N.P

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976

D.S.P.

・
︑H
d
c

A

O
D
N

O

T
A

︑
︑

I＼・
PLATE

〉、

．一

、 ，． 、．・ー

.

.
工
、
. e
.
‑ ~ ，）
・司
康

E
・

F

．
．
−

可

ニ

・
・
・
・

s.んはf
sRe
e
ρ．Whal
e
・R
i
.
Sc
,19;;

.28
o
N

9L6l

z・oN
e
'

JS
！
y・
a
f
<
y S3/VlfA1 ・
a
s
［・
'"/W

・
l
:
¥
.
'
IV
L
HSO ClNVO.
V WI

l
V1c
＇ LL
.
＇
八

PLA T巳 YI

TO A N D OSHIM A:¥AI. b1Sl.,se. WhalesR
p
e
.R
i
c
S

6
7
9
,1
8
.2
o
N

NAITO AND OSHIMA

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 28, 1976

PLATE VII

PLATE VIII

N AITO 八氏。 OSHIMA

S
c
i
.Re
ρfth
a
l
e
sRe
s.I
n
s
t.
,
.
V
o
.28
,1976