SOME INFORMATIONS ON DISTRIBUTION AND
SEASONAL MOVEMENT OF THE GANGES DOLPHINTOSHIO KASUYA* AND A. K. M. AMINUL HAQUE**
ABSTRACT

By analizing the data on the distribution of Platanista gangetica obtained in
Nepal and East Pakistan in 1969 and 1970, following conclusion was obtained.
The upper range of the distribution in the Narayani River is at Dio Ghat,
about 100 km north of the range reported before. In monsoon season, theyextend the distribution to smaller streams, and go down to larger streams in dry
season. The density is lower in the estuary. They were observed swimming
mostly single or in couple in dry season. But they often assemble to special
narrow area of waters, which is probably affected by the distribution of food.
INTRODUCTION

Though Anderson (1878) and Pilleri (1970) accomplished a intensive study on the
distribution of the Indus and Ganges dolphins, their upper limit of the distribution in
the Himalayan piedmont area, and the seasonal movements are not still clear.
Here, we report some informations on the distribution of the Ganges dolphin,
Platanista gangetica, obtained by the Cetacean Research Expedition, University ofTokyo, directed by Prof. M. Nishiwaki.
The observation in Nepal was made in Feb. 1970, and that in East Pakistan,present Bangladesh, in the period from Oct. 1969 to May 1970.
DISTRIBUTION IN NEPAL

It is reported that the Ganges dolphin distributes in India up to near the boundaryof Nepal along the Gandak (Anderson 1878). Present investigation was made at the
Narayani River and its tributary, the Rapti River. They form one of the three large
river systems in Nepal, and the lower stream of the Narayani River is called theGandak which meet with the Ganges River at Patna, India.
On the Rapti River, the observation was made from Hitaura (85°02'E, 27°26'N)
down to Jhawani in dry season on Feb. 2, 1970. The stream of this river was too
shallow to expect the dolphin, and according to the informations obtained from thepeople in Jhawani and other several villages, the dolphin, which is called Suongsu,
distributes not in the Rapti River but in the Narayani River.
Along the Narayani River, observation was made on the next 2 days with asmall country boat from Dio Ghat to Bhwasara Ghat. The former situates at the confluence of the Kaligandaki and the Burigandaki. The water depth of this river was* Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
* * Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 24, 1972, 109-115.

110

KASUYA AND HAQUE

measured with a weight and a line, and the width of the stream was presumed by eye,which are shown in Fig. 1. Though we could not find the dolphin, following informations were obtained from the people who live in the valley.
1. Dio Ghat: The dolphin is seen at this spot both in dry and rainy seasons,but none in the upper streams.
2. Narayani Bazar: Dolphins are seen sometimes in summer season, usually 1
or 2 individuals, recently (winter) no sighting.
3. Pitonj Ghat: Dolphins are seen sometimes (from Nepalese people). A
dolphin was observed once between Dec., 1963 and Jan., 1964 by Mr. T. Shimada aJapanese proprietor of a farm.
4. Bhwasara Ghat: No dolphin is seen in the dry season, but have been seenin August to October (rainy season).
5. Gola Ghat: No dolphin was seen by us.
6. Gola Ghat to Tribeni Ghat: A Japanese doctor Iwashita sighted thedolphins on several occasions in March, 1969.

- - - - - l 27°50'N

64'E

84'30'E

Fig. I. Map showing the Narayani valley, Nepal.
water, and W width in m.

D indicates the depth of theAmong these informations, those obtained from Mr. Shimada and Dr. Iwashita
are most reliable. Considering all of these informations it is concluded that theGanges dolphin distributes in the Narayani River both in winter and summer seasons
but the density between Gola Ghat and Dio Ghat will be lower in the winter season
than in the summer season. Probably, most of the dolphins in the upper stream
will move to the downstream in the winter. Though the stream with 10 m or more
depth was found at Dio Ghat, most of the part of the stream between Dio Ghat andGola Ghat was shallow and rapid. This environment will not be suitable for thisspecies. But in the summer season, considering from the water mark on the rock, thewater level at Dio Ghat seems to be about 3 m higher than in the winter.
The streams upper than Dio Ghat, or the Kaligandaki and Burigandaki are
shallow and run in the rocky mountaineous area. So the migration of the dolphin is
not expected. It will be safe to say that the upper limit of distribution along theSci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 24, 1972.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE GANGES DOLPHINTABLE 1.

WATER AND AIR TEMPERATURE AT NARAYAN! VALLEY
AND MYMENSINGH (BRAHMAPUTRA RIVER)
Narayani valley

Water
Air

111

14.9°C (Dio Ghat, 09.00)
15.8°C (Pitonj Ghat, 10.55
7 .9°C (06.00)
2 l.3°C (13.30)

Mymensingh
19.0-20.7°C (Morning)
10.5-13.3°C (06.00)
21 -23°C (14.00)

Narayani River will be at around Dio Ghat, which situates about 250 m above thesea level and about 100 km north from the uppermost range of the distribution
confirmed by Anderson (1878).
The air and water temperature in the Narayani valley is shown in Table 1.
The air temperature is nearly same with that at Mymensingh and Assam (Pilleri1970), but the water temperature seems slightly lower than that at the Brahmaputra.
SEASONAL MOVEMENT

The seasonal movement of the Ganges dolphin was studied in East Pakistan, present
Bangladesh. The observation was made at fixed stations on the Brahmaputra andthe Meghna, or from the cruising ships in the Meghna and theJamuna. In the caseof the fixed stations, a half hour or one hour observation was repeated with the several
days intervals. All the stations on the Brahmaputra River were placed around
Mymensingh, and the distance from the uppermost station at Khagdahar to thelower station at Kalir Bazar is about 25 km along the river. All of these 8 stations are
situated at the depths or at the confluence of a small river (Kewatkhali), where thedolphins are observed more numerously than the other places.
The Brahmaputra was once a main stream of the Brahmaputra river system,
but in the present days it is only a branch of the main stream connecting the two big
streams, or the J amuna River and the Megha River. So in the winter season, its
water depth is usually less than several meters except some deep spots. In January,
the water depth near the station at Kalir Bazar was only about 1 m. The station at
Sandarghat in Dacca is also on the relatively small branch of the Meghna River.
Other observations were made at the maiP stream of the Meghna and the J amuna.
Table 2 shows the seasonal fluctuation of the density of the dolphin consideredfrom the frequency of the surfacing individuals. The density was classified into 4categories of many, several, few, and none. In case when the number of individuals
was estimated, it was also recorded. As seen in this table, the population of thedolphin in the Brahmaputra starts to decrease at the beginning of November. And
in December and January, only few individuals seem to have remained in the observed area of the Brahmaputra near Mymensingh. Same tendency was also observed at the station at Sandarghat. Other information on the population density inthe Brahmaputra was obtained from the result of" J agatber " fishing, in which one
net is set across the river and another net which is set in the upper stream is moved
slowly day by day toward the down stream, finally to catch all the fish between theSci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 24, 1972.

112

KASUY A AND HAQUETABLE 2. SEASONAL FLUCTUATION OF THE DENSITY OF THE GANGESDOLPHIN SIGHTED AT THE STATION OR ON THE SHIP
Month

DecadeBrahmaputra
Khagdahar
Govindapur
Shambhuganj
Kewatkhali
Sutiakhali
Phulpur
Bhabakhali
Kalir Bazar
MeghnaBhairab Bazar
Sandarghat, Dacca
Chandpur-Dacca
JamunaTistamukhghat-Goalundoghat

Nov.

Oct.

2

3

*
* *
* *0
* +
*
-te
* *
*

2

Dec.

3

+

+

0

0

*

+ o, 1-2

+

1

*
*
ttt

2
0

0

0
0
0, 1
0
0
1-2

Jan.

3

0
0
0
0
0 0, 1, 2
0, 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

1

2

O, 1
0
0
0
0
0

ttt

ttt
0

ttt
ttt

ttt

two nets. TheJagatber operated in January at the Brahmaputra River near Jamalpur (see the map in Kasuya 1972) showed that there was 3 dolphins in the stream of
5 km length.
In Assam the rainy season lasts from May to September and there is very few
rainfall in the remaining months (Pilleri 1970), as the result the water level of theGanges-Brahmaputra river system is considered to decrease from October to April.
So we consider that the most of the Ganges dolphin in the tributaries may have retreated to the main streams and will come back again in the rainy season. However,some individuals seem to be left in the tributaries in the dry season. They are mostly
juvenile animals of about one year old (Kasuya 1972).
In the large stream of the Meghna and the J amuna the dolphin is observed inboth rainy and dry seasons.
The geographical variation of the density of the Ganges dolphin in dry season
was observed from the cruising ship by one or two persons in 1970 in the following
area (for the name of the place, see Kasuya 1972).
J amuna River2, Jan.; 2 persons, Jagannathganj Ghat-Sirajganj Ghat, Steamer.
14, Jan.; 2 persons, Bahadurabad Ghat-Tistamukh Ghat-J agannathganj
Ghat, Launch.
19, Jan.; 2 persons, Jagannathganj Ghat-Sirajganj Ghat-Goalundo Ghat,
Launch.
20, Jan.; 2 persons, Chandpur-Narayanganj, Steamer.
27, Jan.; 1 person, Narayanganj-Chandpur-Barisal (to Sundarbans, continue
to 28th), Steamer.
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,

No. 24, 1972.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE GANGES DOLPHIN

113

Sundarbans
28, Jan.; 1 person, (Barisal)-Tharacatti-N alchiti-Mouth of Haring a ta R.Chalna-Khulna, Steamer.
30, Jan.; 1 pc rson, Khulna-Mouth of Pusur R.-Khulna, Launch.
Meghna river
30, Apr.-3, May; 1 person, Streams from Bhairab Bazar to Sunamganj, Several
launches.
TABLE 3. GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION OF THE DENSITY OF GANGESDOLPHIN BASED ON THE OBSERVATION ON THE SHIP
Distancefromestuary 1 >0- 30
30- 6060- 9090-120120-150
150-180
180-210130<llLocality

Number ofsightings
individuals

lower Sundarbans
up to Khulna (upper Sundarbans)
up to Chandpur (lower Meghna)
up to Dacca
up of Goal undo Ghat
up to Sirajganj Ghat
up to Tistamukh Ghat
Meghna, upper streamof Bhairab Bazar

Number ofindividuals
per 100 miles'>

Month

29
32
34
95
15
37
37
4

29
67
35
191
182
57
69
16

January

540

229

April and May

"
"
"
"

"

"
"

in nautical miles.

Table 3 shows the total number of individuals sighted, and the relative densityof the dolphin shown by the calculated number of sighted individuals per 100 nautical
miles (186 km) of observation. In case of the Meghna, calculation was made assuming the speed of launch as 8 knot (15 km/hour).
According to this result the dolphin seems to distribute densely in the lower andupper Meghna, and lower Jamuna. But the density in the estuary is slightly low.
Other than the Ganges dolphin, 6 Orcaella brevirostris, which were identified by
the dark colour and the pointed dorsal fin, were observed in 5 occasions at Mongla
and Sundarbans.
SCHOOLING BEHAVIOR

Because of the turbidity of the water, the behavior of the dolphin under thewater is not observable. In this study, dolphin or dolphins surfacing at close distanceand swimming toward nearly same direction were considered to belong to one school.
Table 4 shows frequency distribution of the number of individuals constituting aschool. This observation was made in the dry season in the same cruise mentioned in
the preceding chapter. It is shown in the table that most of the schools, 90.0 % of thetotal number of schools sighted or 80.4 % of the dolphin of this species are single individual. The schools formed by 2 individuals are found in only 8.4 % of all theschools, and the number of animals constituting these schools is 15.0 %· So, it is conSci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,
No. 24, 1972.

KASUYA AND HAQUE

114
TABLE 4.

SCHOOL SIZE OF THE GANGES DOLPHIN
Month

Locality%no.
Tistamukh Ghat to Golundo Ghat
Jan.
Lower Meghna and Sundarbans
Jan.
Upper MeghnaApr., May
Total no. of schools
Total no. of individuals

73 90.l
189 85.9
550 91.5
772 90.0772 80.4

No. of individuals in a school
3
4
2
no.
% no. % no. %
5
28
39
72
144

6.2
12.7
7.0
8.4
15.0

2 2.5
3 1.4
7 1.3
12 1.436 3.8

0
1
2
8

1.2
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.8

total
OJ
no.
lo
81
220
557
858
960

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

~

!'...-50
>.
u

c
Cll
&30

Cll
.....

IJ...

10

2

0

3

4

Distance in nautical mile
Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of the length of the course where the Ganges dolphin
was sighted with the interval less than 1/3 nautical mile. Closed circle and solidline indicate theJamuna River, and open circle and dotted line the lower Meghnaand Sundarvans .

........
~

~20
>-.

u

c

Cll
::::J

g-10

....

IJ..

0

7
8
6
4
5
3
Distance in nautical mile

2

Fig. 3. Frequency distribution of the length of the course where the Ganges dolphin
was not sighted. In case where the dolphin was sighted with the interval less than
1/3 miles, it is dealt as continuous. For other marks see Fig. 2.
Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,

No. 24, 1972.

DISTRIBUTION OF THE GANGES DOLPHIN

115

sidered that the Ganges dolphin is not a gregarious species, at least in dry season,quite different from the other oceanic dolphins.
Fig. 2 shows the frequency distribution of the length of the course of the ship
where the dolphins were observed with the intervals less than 1 /3 nautical mile
(620 m). This indicates that the dolphin assembles to some narrow placess in theriver. We think that this will be related with the distribution of the food of thedolphin, because the dolphins were often observed at the confluence of a river or down
streams of a shallow place. As seen in Fig. 3, the places where dolphin assembles areusually scattered with the distance less than 3 nautical miles (5.6 km), but sometimes with 4 miles or more distance.
The Ganges dolphin never comes to the bow of the ship, which is different fromthe usual oceanic dolphins.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We acknowledge all the members of the Catacean Research Expedition, University ofTokyo, who helped us in collecting the data on distribution of the Ganges dolphin.
Mr. Hamada and Dr. Shimada of the Rapti Agricultural Experimental andModel Farm helped us in having a small trip to the Narayani River, and Dr. Iwashita
informed us of his observation on the dolphin in i"epal. These persons are greatly
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
ANDERSON, J., 1878. Anatomical and zoological researches, comprizing an account of the zoological result of the two
expeditions to Western Yunnan in 1868 and 1875 and a monograph of the two cetacean genella, Platanista and Orcella, vol. 1. B. Quaritch, London, 564 pp.
KASUYA, T., 1972. Some informations on the growth of the Ganges dolphin with a comment on the Indus
dolphin. Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst., 24: 87-108.
PrLLERI, G., 1970. Observations on the behavior of Platanista gangetica in the Ind us and Brahmaputra Rivers.
Investigations on Cetacea, 2: 27-60. G. Pilleri (ed.), Berne.

EXPLANATION OF PLATE
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Gola Ghat, the upper limit of distribution of Platanistagangetica on the Narayani River in
Nepal. The stream of this side is the Burigandaki River, the other the Kali gandaki
River, and the lower stream at the left.
Fishing boats in the Brahmaputra River, at Samoganj near Mymensingh, Jan. 1970.
The Meghna River at Bhairab Bazar, Jan. 1970.

Sci. Rep. Whales Res. Inst.,

No. 24, 1972.

I3
:
.
L
V1d

邑

'U6
！争Z・O｝ぜ
l
山 l'
f
J
l
lS
3
/
V
l
f
A
<
I・
（
f
3
l
l'
"
S

ヨ日O V
H GNVV入口 SV){