CoP17 Prop. 56

Inclusion of Guibourtia demeusei, G. pellegriniana and G. tessmannii in Appendix IIwith annotation #4
Proponents: Gabon and European Union
Summary: The genus Guibourtia is currently considered to comprise between 14 and 16 species1,2; 13
occur in tropical Africa, and one in the Neotropics1. All three species in the current proposal are African foresttrees.
Guibourtia tessmannii grows to 65m with a trunk that can exceptionally reach 2m in diameter at breast
height (DBH) but is generally smaller. It is found at very low population density on firm ground in evergreen
forest in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon. It is also believed likely to occur in southeast Nigeria, theRepublic of Congo and extreme southwest Central African Republic, being present in logging concessions inCameroon near these countries. It has not been confirmed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo3.
Guibourtia pellegriniana grows to 30m, with a trunk typically around 40cm DBH. It also occurs at very low
population density. Its known distribution is considerably smaller than that of G. tessmannii. Herbarium
specimens originate from a narrow strip of coastal forests in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon andpossibly the Republic of Congo. Recent work indicates it may be more widespread than this, also occurringin forests further inland where G. tessmannii is found, although at much lower density.
Guibourtia demeusei grows 25 to 40m tall with a trunk up to one metre DBH. It occurs in periodicallyflooded and swampy forest and gallery forest, often in pure stands4. It has a much larger range than theother two species, extending into the central Congo basin. It occurs in Cameroon, Central African Republic,Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, and the Republic of Congo5.
There is a general lack of biological data for these species, which are all from closed forest and havehistorically been problematic to study6. G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana are said to be difficult todistinguish from each other in the field. Increment rate (increase in trunk diameter) of ca. 0.35cm per year
has been estimated for G. tessmannii in Gabon and of ca. 0.4cm per year for managed populations ofG. demeusei in the Republic of Congo7. Frugivorous animals are thought to play an important part in seeddispersal.
Some inventory data are available. Historic estimates for Gabon (of a probable stock of three to sevenmillion m3 of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana combined made in 1975 and of seven to 13 million m3 madein 1995) are not considered reliable. More recent assessment in forestry concessions in Gabon foundextremely low stocks of the two species combined that could be harvested on a sustainable basis (annualharvests from effectively zero to 0.0045m3 per ha). Inventories in Cameroon have found similarly low
stocking densities, between 0.002 and 0.06 trees with DBH >20cm per ha. A considerably higher density ofG. demeusei, of 0.4 stems per ha, has been reported in the Central African Republic5.
The timber of all three species is commonly used locally and has a high socio-cultural value8. G. tessmannii
and G. pellegriniana in particular are reportedly highly sought-after as timber for furniture-making within theirrange, although there is no information on quantities used.
All three species are traded internationally as Bubinga but are also known under other names, such asKevazingo. G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana are commonly referred to as Rose Bubinga and arereportedly indistinguishable in trade. G. demeusei, or Red Bubinga, can be distinguished and is generally
considered of inferior quality, but reportedly may be easily confused with or substituted for that of the othertwo on the international market. Historically most exports were to Europe; more recently China has become
the main market as the timber is used for the making of Hongmu-type (rosewood and blackwood or ebony)furniture, demand for which has increased greatly in the past decade. Guibourtia species are not a part of therecognised Hongmu standard in China, but their timber is a category A2 hardwood that is used as a
substitute for Hongmu timbers9.
Trade data, often reported under trade (i.e. non-scientific) names, may refer to one or other of the threespecies, or some combination of them. Reported exports of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana combinedfrom Gabon have increased over time. Until 2009 all recorded export was of roundwood (logs), rising from anaverage annual export of ca. 25,000m3 in 1987 to 1992, to ca. 60,000m3 in 1993 to 1999 and just under
70,000m3 in 2000 to 2009. From 2011 onwards, only sawnwood has been officially recorded as exported.
1

CoP17 Prop. 56
Using a conversion factor from sawnwood to roundwood of three, on average the equivalent of 65,000m3roundwood was exported annually in 2011 to 2014.
Recorded exports from Cameroon do not distinguish between the three species. Exports are at a much lower
level than those for Gabon, amounting for ca. 13,000m3 roundwood per year in 1995 to 1998 and roundwood
equivalent of around 6000m3 in sawnwood per year for 1999 to 2014 with little discernible overall trend. Data
from logging requests submitted by forest management units indicates that during the period 2008 to 2012,around 75% of logged volume of Guibourtia in Cameroon was of G. demeusei, with volumes requested forthis species for 2011 to 2013 considerably higher than those requested in previous years. At the same time
requested volume of G. tessmannii (probably including G. pellegriniana) halved.
Recorded exports of Bubinga from Equatorial Guinea are at a low level, although have risen from virtuallyzero in 2007 to ca. 400 m3 in 20115. The species involved are not identified, nor is it clear if the volume is forroundwood or sawnwood.
Bubinga exported from Democratic Republic of the Congo is G. demeusei (the other two species do notoccur there); it is likely that all Bubinga exported from Central African Republic (where G. demeusei is known
to occur and the other two have not been confirmed) is also G. demeusei. Reported exports from the Central
African Republic rose sharply from zero or nearly zero in 2005 to 2009 to ca. 600m3 in 2010 and 1700m3 in2011 (again, it is unclear if this is roundwood or sawnwood). Recorded exports from the Democratic Republicof the Congo also increased, from very low levels in 2005 to 2008 to ca. 700m3 in 2009 and 2000m2 in eachof 2010 and 2011.
Roundwood of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana is advertised on the internet, indicating that it is available
on the international market despite the fact that the two countries known to export these species prohibit
export of roundwood. It is suspected that declared exports represent only a proportion of the actual volume
exported, although exactly what proportion remains unknown. There are narrative accounts of extensive
illegal and unauthorised logging of these species in Cameroon5.
Current low population densities of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana have been ascribed to past
exploitation10. However, there is an absence of baseline information on which to assess the effects ofexploitation.
Minimum felling diameters have been set in some range States. The export of Bubinga logs has beenprohibited in Cameroon since 1999 and Gabon since 2010. In November 2012 Cameroon suspended its
harvest of G. tessmannii in the national forest domain.
Guibourtia ehie and G. arnoldiana are distributed in the same region as the proposed three species, and arealso in international trade but are easily distinguished due to their brown wood.
The listing of these species is proposed with an annotation (#4) that would include all parts and derivatives,
except seeds, seedlings or tissue cultures obtained in vitro and cut flowers of artificially propagated plants.
Analysis: Information on the status of Guibourtia tessmannii, G. pellegriniana and G. demeusei is sparse.
There is very little information on recruitment rates or age and size at maturity. The species, particularly G.
tessmannii and G. pellegriniana, are known to be in demand internationally for their rosewood-type timber,the market for which has grown very rapidly in Asia, particularly China, in recent years.
Populations of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana are of low density, although it is not known if this is anatural state or a result of past exploitation. Where there is information on trade in these species it appears
to be at a low level. There are indications of illegal offtake and trade, the volume of which is not quantified
but which may be relatively high. Given the evident scarcity of harvestable-sized G. tessmannii and G.
pellegriniana it is likely that current harvest, including illegal offtake, for export is exceeding the rate at whichsuch trees are entering the population, leading to probable commercial extinction of these species. It isunclear, however, whether this will lead to the species themselves becoming threatened by harvest or otherinfluences, or becoming eligible for inclusion in Appendix I in the near future
G. demeusei is a widespread species that can be locally abundant. Reported harvest and export in a numberof its range States increased around 2009 and 2010, which may be associated both with increasing demand
for rosewoods in general at that time, and declining availability of G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana.
However, recorded harvest and export remain at a relatively low level, indicating that the species is unlikely
to meet the criteria for inclusion in Appendix II in Annex 2 a of Res. Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16).
2CoP17 Prop. 56

Given the difficulties in distinguishing between G. tessmannii and G. pellegriniana, if either were to beincluded in Appendix II, then the other would meet the criteria in Annex 2b A of the Resolution (lookalikecriteria). Information regarding the similarity of these two species to G. demeusei is conflicting. By someaccounts the principal part in trade (timber) is relatively straightforward to distinguish, although all three may
be traded under the same generic trade name. It is unclear, therefore, whether G. demeusei does meet thecriteria in Annex 2b A of the Resolution.
Reviewers: D. Mahonghol and T. Osborn.
References:
Information not referenced in the Summary section is from the Supporting Statement.
1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2016). Guibourtia ehie (Black hyedua). Available at: http://www.kew.org/science-conservation/plants-fungi/guibourtia-ehie-black-hyedua. Viewed on 6th July2016.
2 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (2016). Guibourtia. Available at:
http://www.theplantlist.org/browse/A/Leguminosae/Guibourtia/. Viewed on 6th July 2016.
3 Contra to the following report which is in error: Mahonghol, D. & Osborn, T. (2015) Review of trade in selected Africantimber species threatened by international trade from major range States (Cameroon, Congo, Democratic Republic ofCongo and Gabon) to Germany and the EU: A preliminary assessment of Guibourtia tessmannii (Bubinga) and Millettia
laurentii (Wenge) (A preliminary draft information document prepared by TRAFFIC and WWF Germany for the 21st
Meeting of the CITES Plants Committee).
4 Useful Tropical Plants Database (2016) Useful Tropical Plants Database. http://tropical.theferns.info/. Viewed on 3rdJuly 2016.
5 Betti, J. L. (2012) Background information on the conservation status of Bubinga and Wenge tree species in Africa
countries. Report prepared for the international tropical timber organization (ITTO).
6 Jongkind, C. (2016) In litt. to IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses Team, Cambridge, UK.
7 Mpati (2015) Review of trade in selected African timber species threatened by international trade. Unpublished report.
8 Mahonghol, D. (2016) In litt. to IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses Team, Cambridge, UK.
9 Chinese Industrial Standard of Precious Dark Color Hardwood Furniture (QB / T 2385-2008).
10 van der Burgt, X. (2016) In litt. to IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses Team, Cambridge, UK.

3