EPEAT Program
Continuous Monitoring Outcomes Report
Imaging Equipment
IE-2021-01
March 24, 2022

1.0 Background
EPEAT® is a comprehensive voluntary sustainability Type 1 ecolabel that helps purchasers identify sustainable
technology products and services. Central to EPEAT are conformity assurance activities that meet the technicalrigor and credibility needs of the institutional purchasers who rely upon EPEAT. The EPEAT Program ensures
the ongoing conformance of EPEAT-registered products through an ongoing surveillance process known asContinuous Monitoring. Continuous Monitoring activities occur throughout the year and test the ability ofParticipating Manufacturers to prove conformance with EPEAT Criteria on an ongoing basis.
Some Continuous Monitoring activities require that Investigations be conducted in discrete timeframes calledRounds. The EPEAT Program develops an individual plan for each Continuous Monitoring Round, which
specifies the EPEAT Criteria to be investigated, the method of investigation that GEC-approved Conformity
Assurance Bodies (CABs) must use and the specific dates when the Investigation activities must be completed.
The EPEAT Program also selects the Participating Manufacturers and EPEAT-registered products and assigns
Investigations to CABs, which must fully participate in and are responsible for implementing Continuous
Monitoring Round activities with their Participating Manufacturer clients. Participating Manufacturers arerequired to cooperate fully with their GEC-approved CAB during Round activities.
To maintain the level of transparency relied on by purchasers, the EPEAT Program publishes an Outcomes
Report at the conclusion of each Round to summarize the activities conducted and to identify the products andParticipating Manufacturers that received major nonconformances and the actions taken to restore accuracyof the EPEAT Registry.
This document summarizes the activities and results of Continuous Monitoring Round IE-2021-01 conductedfor the Imaging Equipment category.

2.0 Overview of Continuous Monitoring Round IE-2021-01
2.1

Investigation Activities

As per the published Round Plan, Continuous Monitoring Round IE-2021-01 used Level 2 Investigations(laboratory evaluation of products to determine the products’ conformance with specific EPEAT Criteria). GECapproved CABs obtained the products, as identified by the EPEAT Program, from the open market withoutinvolvement of the Participating Manufacturers, where possible, and sent them for laboratory evaluation. The
laboratories evaluated the products against the specified Criteria and produced reports summarizing theactivities conducted and the results. GEC-approved CABs reviewed the reports, made recommendations on
conformity, and sent the reports to the EPEAT Program. The EPEAT Program made the final decisions on
conformity for the Investigations.

Global Electronics Council

Outcomes Report – Level 2 Investigations (P41A Issue2 Rev0)

Page 1 of 3

IE-2021-01 Outcomes Report

2.2March 24, 2022

Criteria InvestigatedContinuous Monitoring Round IE-2021-01 focused on chemicals of concern. Products were selected randomlyusing a random number generator from a list of Participating Manufacturers. In this Round, laboratories
examined the Required Criteria for all products and the Optional Criterion for those products that had selected
the Criterion.
Table 1: Criteria Investigated in Round IE-2021-01
Criteria NumberCriterion Title

4.1.1.1

Compliance with provisions of European RoHS Directive upon its effective date

4.1.2.1

Further reduction of the use of European Union RoHS Directive hazardous substances (cadmium)4.1.5.1

Compliance with provisions of European Union Battery Directive

4.1.6.1

Reducing BFR/CFR/PVC content of external plastic casings

4.8.1.1

Elimination of intentionally added heavy metals in packaging

3.0 Summary of Investigations and Final Decisions on Conformity for IE-2021-01
Highlights from this Continuous Monitoring Round are:•10 investigations completed•

9 decisions of Conformance•1 decision of Inconclusive

4.0 Further Details on Nonconformances for IE-2021-01
All nonconformances must be categorized as either major or minor. Minor nonconformances are non-criticalor clerical in nature and do not materially affect the validity of conformance with EPEAT Criteria. Allnonconformances that do not meet the definition of minor are categorized as major.
There were no nonconformances of any kind identified in Continuous Monitoring Round IE-2021-01.

5.0 Actions to Restore Conformance
Where the final conformity decision is nonconformance (whether major or minor), Participating Manufacturers
must make corrections to restore the accuracy of the EPEAT Registry during the Corrective Action Phase. Theseactivities may include providing additional evidence to demonstrate conformance with the criterion or
unselecting the criteria in the EPEAT Registry. Where the product was found nonconformant and is no longer
available in the marketplace, the product must be archived.
During the Corrective Action Phase, Participating Manufacturers must also develop Corrective Action Plans forother EPEAT-registered products that may be affected by the same underlying issue causing thenonconformance but were not the subject of investigation (called “similarly affected products”).
Since no nonconformances were identified in this Round, no corrective actions were taken.

Global Electronics Council

Outcomes Report – Level 2 Investigations (P41A Issue2 Rev0)

Page 2 of 3

IE-2021-01 Outcomes Report

March 24, 2022

Document Control and Change History
Issue
1Revision01120

Owner
EPEAT Conformity
Assurance Manager
EPEAT Conformity
Assurance Manager
Senior Manager,
Ecolabels andResources

Global Electronics Council

ApproverDirector, EPEAT
ProgramDirector, EPEAT
Program
Senior Director,
Ecolabels andManufacturer
Resources

Description
Initial release

Reformatting of document. Addition ofstandardized text.

Outcomes Report – Level 2 Investigations (P41A Issue2 Rev0)

Approval Date

Effective Date2018 Dec 112018 Dec 112021 Mar 25

2021 Mar 30

Page 3 of 3