- 118 -REFERENCES
CLEVERDON, C.W.

Report on the first stage of an investigation into
the comparative efficiency of indexing systems.
Cranfield; 1960.

CLEVERDON, C.W.

Report on the testing and analysis of an investigation
into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems.
Cranfield, 1962.

AITCHISON, J. and
CLEVEBDON, C.W.

Report of a test on the index of metallurgicalliterature of Western Reserve University.
Cranfield, 1963.

SWANSON, D.R.

The evidence underlying the Cranfield results.
Library Quarterly, 3,5, 1965, pp. 1-20.

CLEVEBDON, C.W.

The Cranfield hypotheses.
Library Quarterly, 35, 1965, pp. 121-124.

LANCASTER, F.W.

Project SHARP. Information storage and retrieval
system; evaluation of indexing procedures andretrieval effectiveness.
1964. Bureau of Ships, Washington.

MONTAGUE, ft.A.

Testing, comparison and evaluation of recall,relevance, and cost of coordinate indexing withlinks and roles.
Proceedings of the American Documentation
Institute. Vol. I, 1964, pp. 357-367.

BOURNE, C.

Review of the criteria and techniques used orsuggested for the evaluation of reference retrieval
systems.
Unpublished note prepared for N.S. F. Evaluation
Meeting, October, 1964.

RICHMOND, P.

System evaluation by comparison testing. 1965.
(To be published in College and Research Libraries).

VICKERY, B.C.

On retrieval system theory.
London. Butterworths. 1961.

GULL, D.C,

Seven years of work on the organisation ofmaterials in the special library.
American Documentation, £, 1956, pp. 320-329.

CLEVEBDON, C.W.
andTHORNE, R.G.

A brief experiment with the Uniterm system of
coordinate indexing for cataloguing of structural data.
R. A.E. Library Memo 7, 1954.

-lie-12.

METCALFE, J.

Information indexing and subject cataloguing.
New York* Scarecrow Press. 1961.

13.

TAUBE, M.

The pitudo-mathematics of relevance.
American Documentation, 16/1965, pp. 69*72.

14.

SALTON, Q.

The evaluation of computer-based information
retrieval systems.
F.I.D. Congress. Washington. October, 1965.

15.

BRANDHORST, W.T.
andECki»f> ? > .

NASA Searoh System analysis she#t.
American Documentation, 1£, 1965, pp. 184-126.

16.

GIBB, M.

Keywords to information.
New Scientist, 26,, 1965, pp. 662-669*

17.

ALTMANN, 1,

Multiple testing of the ABC method and thedevelopment of a second-gene ration model.
Harry Diamond Laboratories. Washington. 1965.

18.

SWANSON, 0.

Word correlation and automatic indexing.
Phase I Final Report. Ramo-Wooldridge. 1960.

10.

O'CONNOR, J.

Some suggested mechanised indexing investigations
which require no machines.
American Documentation 18, 1961, pp. 198-803.

20.

KESSLER, MM.

Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, B*8. 1968.

21.

JONKERS, F.

Indexing theory, indexing methods and search devices.
New York. Soarecrow Press. 1964.

22.

TeNUYL, Th.W,

The L'unitS mechanised documentation system*
Revue de Documentation, |8> 1962, pp. 140*147.

23.

FARRADANE, jf.JU

Relational indexing and classification in the lightof recent experimental work in psychology.
Information Storage and Retrieval l^, 1963, pp. 3-11,

84.

MABON, M.E. andKUHNS, J.L.

SB.

WHELAN, S.

On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information
retrieval.
Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery,±> i960,,(|i, **6*»44.
Library retrieval: the R.R.E, pilot retrieval scheme.
R.H#B. Journal. October, 1958, pp. 59-68.

86.

GARDIN, J.

SYNTOL. Rutgers Series on Systems for theIntellectual Organisation of Information.
Vol. 8, 1985.

- 120 -27.

ENGINEERS JOINTCOUNCIL

Thesaurus of engineering terms.
New York, 1964.

28.

WALTON, T.S.

FROLIC: Thesaurus and code dictionary.
Washington. David Taylor Model Basin. 1963.
(Unpublished).

29. NEEDHAM, R.M. andSPARCK JONES, K.

Keywords and clumps: recent work on information
retrieval at Cambridge Language Research Unit.
Journal of Documentation, 20, 1964, pp. 5-15.

30.

SALTON, 0 .

Progress in automatic information retrieval.
I. E, E. E. Spectrum. August, 1968, pp. 90-103.

31.

O'CONNOR, J.

The Scan-Solumn Index.
American Documentation, Vol. 13, 1962, pp. 204-209.

32.

Three-year project to study citation index
methodology.
Scientific Information Notes, 3,, 1961, No. 3, p. 10.

33.

Investigation into a method for analysing document
representation techniques.
Scientific Notes, £, No. 3, 1965.

34.

Laboratory approach to the study of relevanceassessments in relation to document searching.
Scientific Information Notes, £, No. 4, 1965, p. 14.

35.

Field experimental approach to the study of relevanceassessments in relation to document searching.
Scientific Information Notes, 7 , No. 4, 1985, p. 14.

36.

Application of selected indexing systems to a common
sample of scientific documents.
Scientific Information Notes, 5>, No. 6, 1963, p. 9.