Bibliography

1. Richmond, Phyllis Allen, "fchnt Are We Looking For?";
Science% vol. 139* February 22 f 1965#2% G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization andRetrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19&8, Chapter I.
3.

G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization andRetrieval; ilcGraw Hill Book Co., 19o©t Chapter II.

4.

G. Salton and M. E. Lesk; Computer Evaluation of Indexing and Text Processing; Scientific Report No. ISR-12
to the National Science Foundation Section III, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University; June,1967.

5«G. Saltonf Automatic Information Organization andRetrieval; McGraw Hill Book Co., 19bb, Chapter VII.

6.

M. E. Lesk and G. Salton; Evaluation of Interactive
Search and Retrieval Methods Using Automatic Information Displays; Technical Report No. 68-17t Departmentof Computer Science, Cornell University, revised
September, 1968.

7.

ti. Rubinoff, S. Bergman, W. Franks, and 3. Rubinoff;
Experimental Evaluation of Information Retrieval Througha Teletypewriter; Communications of the ACM, Volume 11,
No* 9 f September, 1968.

6.

J. J. Rocchio, Relevance Feedback in Information Retrieval; Report ISR-9 to the National Science Foundation, Chapter 23.

9#

J. J. Rocchio, Document Retrieval System Optimizationand Evaluation; Harvard University Doctoral Thesis,
Report ISR-10 to the National Science Foundation, Harvard Computation Laboratory; June, 1 9 6 %10.

J. J. Rocchio, G. Salton, Search Optimization and Iterative Retrieval Techniques; Proceedings of the Fall
Joint Computer Conference« Las Vegas, November, 1 9 6 %llo

0. W. Riddle, T. Horwitz, R. Dietz, Relevance Feedbackin Information Retrieval Systems; Report ISR-11 to theNational Science Foundation, Chapter 6, Department ofComputer Science, Cornell University; June, 1966.

12.

R. Crawford and H. Melzer; The Use of Relevant Documents
Instead of Queries in Relevance Feedback; Scientific Report No* ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation,
Section XIII; Department of Computer Science, CornellUniversity) October, 1968.
i

1$.

D. Steinbuhlsr and C. Aleta; Negative Relevance Feedback Process; student reports, Computer Science 43bt
Department of Computer Science, Cornell University,Spring, 1968.

14 •J* Kelly; Negative Response Relevance Feedback; Scientific Report No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation Section IX, Department of Computer Science,Cornell University; June, 1967•

15#0* Salton, The Evaluation of Automatic Retrieval Processes, Selected Test Results Usine; the Sf/ART System;
American Documentation. Vol* 16, No. 3* July* 1 9 6 %16«

F. Wilcoxon, R. Wilcox, Some Rapid Approximate Statistical Procedures; Lederle Laboratories, America
Cyanamid Company, 1964.

17«

H. Hall, N. Weiderman, The Evaluation rroblem in Relevance Feedback Systems; Scientific Report No. ISR-12
to the National Science Poundation, Section XII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, June,

1967.
16.

C. Cleverdon, E. IA. Keen, Factors Determining the Performance of Indexing Systems, Vol. 2, ASLIB CranfieldResearch Project, 1966, Chapter III.

19* fcU Leak, G. Salton, Design Criteria for Automatic Information Systems, Report ISR-11 to the National Science
Foundation, Chapter V, Department of Computer Science,Cornell University, June 1966.
20#

G. Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval ; McGraw Hill Book Co., 1968, Chapter VlT"21#

R. Steel, J. Torrie, Principles & Procedures of Statistics, McGraw Hill Book Co., i960, Chapter 2T.~

22«

G. Salton, Search Strategy^and The Optimization of Retrieval Sffectiveness; Scientific Report No. ISR-12to the National Science Foundation, Section V* Depart- ,ment of Computer Science, Cornell University; June, 1967»25#

Leech and Matlack; Information Retrieval: Dictionary
Representation and Cluster Evaluation; Scientific Report
No# ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section
VII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University;
June, 1967•

24 #Williamson, Williamson, and Ide; The Cornell Programs forCluster Searching and Relevance Feedback, Scientific Heport No. ISR-12 to the National Science Foundation, Section 17, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University;

June| 1967»

205
25#

R« Grauer and M. Messier, An Evaluation of Pocchiof8
Clustering Algorithm, Scientific Report No* ISR-12to the National Science Foundation, Section VT,Department of Computer Sciencef Cornell University, Junef
1V67.

26*

A. Borodin, L# Kerr, F# Lewis, Query Splitting in
Relevance Feedback Systems, Scientific Report No#ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section
XII, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University,October, l'768o27©

M# Davis, M« Linsky, M. Zelkowitz; A RelevanceFeedback System Employing a Dynamically evolving
Document Space; Scientific Report No, ISR-14 to theNational Science Foundation, Section X, Departmentof Computer Science, Cornell University, October,
1^68.

23.

£• Brauen, R. Holt, T* wilcox, Index Space Modification
Based on Relevance Feedback, Scientific Report Noa
ISR-14 to the National Science Foundation, Section
XI, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University,October, 1968.

29*No Nilseon^ Learning M chines. New Yorki

196%

McGraw-Hill,