JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the project

Installation of High Efficiency Loom at Weaving
Factory

Reference number

BD003

Third-party entity (TPE)

TPE-BD-002

Japan

Organization(JQA)

Quality

Project participant contracting the TPE

Toyota Tsusho Corporation

Date of completion of this report

22/03/2018

Assurance

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed
document form
using the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to thetype of project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring
Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology
approved JCM and that the applied version is valid at the time of
methodology
submission of the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex
ante listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental
impactimpact assessment, if required by the People’s Republic ofassessment
Bangladesh, in line with Bangladeshi procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
1JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Schemecompetence*

Mr.
Koichiro
Team
JQA
Ms.
TanabeleaderMr.
Sachiko
Team
JQA
Ms.
Hashizume
memberMr.
Tadashi
External
Internal
Ms.
YoshidaIndividual
reviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader,team member, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
Through a review of the draft PDD, it was checked and confirmed that the PDD wascompleted using the latest version of the PDD form (JCM_BD_F_PDD_ver03.0)
appropriate to the type of project and drafted in line with JCM Guidelines for Developing
PDD and MR (JCM_BD_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0)<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the PDD was completed using the valid form in linewith the JCM Guidelines for Developing PDD and MR.
C.2. Project description3

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Means of validation>
The title of the proposed JCM project is “Installation of High Efficiency Loom at
Weaving Factory” (herein after referred to as the proposed JCM project). The proposed
JCM project aims to reduce CO2 emissions from electricity consumption in the People’s
Republic of Bangladesh (herein after referred to as Bangladesh) by installing energy
efficient air jet looms in Bangladesh's textile industry. The project participant from
Bangladesh is Hamid Fabrics Limited (herein after referred to as HFL) and the project
participants from Japan is Toyota Tsusho Corporation (herein after referred to as TTC).
The proposed JCM project is expected to achieve the amount of 437 tCO2e emission
reductions per annum. The estimated emission reductions of the period between 2018and 2020 are calculated to be 3,058 tCO2e in the PDD.
The starting date of project operation is defined as 24/06/2018 and the expected
operational lifetime of the proposed JCM project is defined as 7 years. With respect tothe staring date of project operation, an issue was raised and resolved as mentioned in
Section C.10 of this validation report. The proposed project was partially supported by
the Ministry of the Environment, Japan (MOEJ) through the financing programme for
JCM Model projects, which provided financial support of less than half of the initialinvestment for the projects in order to acquire JCM credits. Further, implementation of
the proposed project promotes technology transfer of low carbon technologies in
Bangladesh as high efficiency air jet looms equipped with energy saving technologies
are installed through the MOEJ’s programme.
The validation team conducted desk review and interviews to confirm the accuracy
and completeness of the project description. The documents reviewed during the desk
review are listed in Section E.2 of this report. The interviewees are listed in Section E.1.
The validation team did not visit the project site, for local security reasons andaccording to the validation contract. Based on the findings through the process taken,
an issue was raised and resolved as described below.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL01)
It is requested to clarify the detailed address of project site in Section A.3 of PDD. It isrequested to describe the latitude and longitude by using a format searchable by google
map.
(Summary of the response on CL01)4

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Latitude, longitude information of the project site in the PDD has been revised basedon the Google map output showing the location of the Hamid Fabrics factory and its
geographical coordinates. The Google map output is submitted for review.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL01)
It was confirmed that the provided latitude and longitude information is searchable in
Google map. The validation team identified the location of Hamid Fabrics factory on the
Google map. Therefore, this issue was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the accuracy and completeness of the projectdescription were valid.
C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The project applies the approved methodology BD_AM003 "Energy efficiency
improvement through the introduction of energy efficient air jet looms in textile industry"version.01.0. This methodology was approved by JC on 16 October 2017. It is
confirmed that this methodology is applicable to the proposed JCM project and theapplied version of 01.0 is valid at the time of submission of the project for validation.
The fulfilment of each eligibility criterion defined in the methodology is confirmed bychecking the documentation referred to in the PDD and by reviewing comparable
information.
Criterion 1: The air jet loom(s) are introduced at a textile factory. The air jet looms
introduced as part of the project are equipped with energy saving technologies such as
an optimized shape reed’s tunnel of nozzles and a pressure sensor to measure airpressure of nozzles for optimization of compressed air consumption of weft insertion.

Through reviewing the annual report of HFL, the validation team confirmed that it is
one of the leading manufacturers of high quality textiles in Bangladesh. The productrange offers 100% cotton fabrics as well as blended fabrics such as cotton/polyester,
cotton/viscose, nylon/cotton and cotton/lycra. The weaving unit produces gray fabrics invarious design and constructions such as Twill, Canvas, Oxford, Rib stop, Rib cord,
Ottoman, Herringbone, and various dobby designs.
5

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Through reviewing the equipment specifications attached to the quotation of 60 sets of
air jet looms prepared for HFL by TTC, it was confirmed that the model number of the
project air jet looms is JAT810. Through reviewing the brochure of JAT810, it was
confirmed that air jet loom JAT810 is equipped with optimized shape reed’s tunnel ofnozzles and a pressure sensor to measure air pressure of nozzles for optimization ofcompressed air consumption of weft insertion.
Therefore, it was confirmed that the proposed JCM project is satisfying this eligibility
criterion.

Criterion 2: Periodical checks of the project air jet loom(s) are conducted at least once
every calendar year.

Through reviewing the provided record of periodical checks, "Monthly Preventative
Maintenance status" and "Weekly Greasing & Oiling Schedule Record", it was
confirmed that the project participants implement greasing and oiling weekly andpreventative maintenance monthly. Regarding Criterion 2, an issue was raised andresolved as mentioned in the section below. As a result, it was confirmed that the
proposed JCM project is satisfying this eligibility criterion.
Criterion 3: Shedding mechanism of the project air jet loom(s) is either Cam or Dobby
shedding.
Through reviewing the equipment specifications attached to the quotation of 60 sets of
air jet looms prepared for HFL by TTC and it was confirmed that 45 sets of air jet looms
are Cam shedding and 15 sets of air jet looms are Dobby shedding. Therefore, it was
confirmed that the proposed JCM project is satisfying this eligibility criterion.
Criterion 4: The effective reed width of the project air jet loom(s) is less than or equal to
190 cm.
Through reviewing the equipment specifications attached to the quotation of 60 sets of
air jet looms prepared for HFL by TTC, it was confirmed that the effective reed width ofthe project air jet looms is 190cm. Therefore, it was confirmed that the proposed JCM
project is satisfying this eligibility criterion.
6

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL03)
With respect to the eligibility criterion 2, it is requested to clarify the detail of periodical
check of project air jet looms, especially responsibility, schedule and check items.
(Summary of the response on CL03)
To maintain smooth operation of project air jet looms, Hamid Fabrics plans to conductperiodic check of project air jet looms on monthly and weekly basis.

The mainactivities for both monthly and weekly periodic check of air jet looms are greasing,oiling, and cleaning of parts outlined in the "weekly greasing & oiling schedule record"and "monthly preventive maintenance status".
(Assessment result of the responses on CL03)
Through reviewing the provided samples of "weekly greasing & oiling schedule record"and "monthly preventive maintenance status", it was confirmed that the periodical
checks and preventative maintenance of project air jet looms are conducted weekly andmonthly by HFL. The validation team confirmed that the actual implementation of the
proposed JCM project satisfies the eligibility criterion 2. Therefore, this issue wasclosed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project meets each eligibility criterion of
BD_AM003_ver01.0 which is the latest version of the methodology at the time of thevalidation. The issue raised by the team was fully clarified. Therefore the teamconcluded that the project is eligible for applying selected methodology and that theapplied version is valid at the time of submission of the proposed JCM project forvalidation.
C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>
The sources of reference emissions is electricity consumption by reference rapierlooms. The sources of project emissions is electricity consumption by the loom motors
and air compressors of the project air jet looms. The validation team conducted the7JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

validation for the proposed JCM project through reviewing the relevant supporting
documents, and without an on-site visit for security reasons. As a result, it is confirmedthat all emission sources covered in the applied methodology are included. The
Monitoring

Plan

Sheet

(MPS)

has

been

prepared

by

using

JCM_BD_AM003_ver01.0.xlsx. The validation team confirmed that it is not altered, andits required fields are appropriately filled in.
As for two project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante, namely, EFelec,grid (CO2emission factor for the grid electricity consumed by the project) and EFelec,cap (CO2emission factor for the captive electricity consumed by the project), the validation teamassessed the estimated value for each of them by supporting documents including
photos of the captive power generator using natural gas as fuel at the project site. In thecourse of such assessment issues were raised and resolved as mentioned in thesection below.
As for the parameters to be monitored ex post, project participants provide theestimated values of ΣECPJLM,p (Total electricity consumption by the motor(s) of the
project air jet loom(s) during the period p) and ΣECPJAC,p (Total electricity consumption
by the air compressor(s) of the project air jet loom(s) during the period p) to complete
the ex-ante estimation of CO2 emission reductions to be achieved by the proposed JCM
project in Table 3 of Monitoring plan sheet (Input sheet). Regarding the assumption ofoperation date of the project equipment which are used for the ex-ante estimation of theelectricity consumptions, an issue was raised and resolved as mentioned in the section
below.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL04)
The estimated value of CO2 emission factor for the grid electricity consumed by the
project (EFelec,grid) in the MPS is 0.656. But the value in Letter on the CO2 emission
factor for the grid electricity in Bangladesh issued by Ministry of Environment,
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh dated 19/08/2013, which wasprovided as the source of the estimated value is 0.67. It is requested to clarify theinconsistency. Regarding CO2 emission factor for the captive electricity consumed by
the project (EFelec,cap), the default value for the captive electricity with natural gas as fuel,0.46 is applied. It is requested to clarify the fuel used for the captive power generator of
the HFL.

8

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(Summary of the response on CL04)
PDD has been revised to reflect the latest published grid emission factor for
Bangladesh, which is 0.67. The fuel used for the captive power generator of the HFL isnatural gas.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL04)
It was confirmed that the grid emission factor for Bangladesh was revised as 0.67 in
the MPS. Through reviewing the picture provided by PPs, it was confirmed that the fuelused for the captive power generator at the Hamid Fabrics factory is natural gas.
Therefore, this issue was closed.
(Issue raised as CL06)
There are two parameters to be monitored ex post as below;
1. Total electricity consumption by the motor(s) of the project air jet loom(s) during theperiod p [MWh/p]
2. Total electricity consumption by the air compressor(s) of the project air jet loom(s)during the period p [MWh/p]
The PP estimated each value by multiplication using the rated energy consumption of
motors and compressors, number of project air jet looms and number of operation date.
With respect to the number of operation date, it is requested to clarify theappropriateness of the applied value (24hours x 30days x 12months) in terms of legal
restraints or not, such as labor legislations in Bangladesh.
(Summary of the response on CL06)
According to Hamid Fabrics, the factory is in operation for 24hrs/day (3 shifts per day).
Also, according to the factory record, the number of operating days between March2017 and January 2018 was 299days, which leads to monthly average operating daysof 27days/month. The applied value used for the emission reduction calculation(24hours x 30days x 12months) has been revised to reflect actual number of operatingdays (24hours x 27days x 12months).
(Assessment result of the responses on CL06)
It was confirmed that the justification on the operation hours is reasonable and therevision of the emission reductions calculation was reflected in the revised PDD and
MPS appropriately. Therefore, this issue was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
9JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team reached the conclusion that the selected emission sources and
GHG types were justified for the JCM project. The validation team assessed theestimated values for project-specific parameters both to be fixed ex ante and to bemonitored ex post in the MPS including intermediate processes to derive the values.
The issues raised by the team were fully clarified, which resulted in a revision of the
PDD and the MPS. As a result, those estimated values fixed ex-ante, and ex-anteestimation of CO2 emission reductions were considered reasonable in the context of the
proposed JCM project.
C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
It is confirmed through the review of the following documents that no environmental
impact assessment is required for the project, in line with the Environment Conservation
Rules, 1997, in Bangladesh.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the project design of the proposed JCM project
was in accordance with the regulation in Bangladesh.
C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The project participants identified the main stakeholders as those who operate andmaintain the project facility at the project site. A stakeholder meeting has been
conducted to invite comments from the stakeholders as below.
Date and8 August, 2017

Time

10:30－12:30 Bangladesh standard time (BST) (or 13:30 – 15:30
Japan standard time (JST))Venue

The following two locations were connected via TV conference10

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

system:

Meeting room at Hamid Fabrics Ltd. Factory, Shilmandi,
Narshingdi

ParticipantsMeeting room at Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Shinagawa, TokyoManaging director, managers, and engineers of Hamid Fabrics Ltd.,and Hannan Consultancy Co., and factory staff who are involved inoperation and maintenance/monitoring of air-jet looms at the project

Invitees who
were notavailable

site.
JETRO Dhaka

The comments received at the meeting were fully taken into account and the results
were reflected in the PDD. It was confirmed through the document review and interview
with the project participants that the above-mentioned process and due steps taken forthe local stakeholder consultation are appropriate. Regarding the consideration of acomment received, an issue was raised and resolved as mentioned below section.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL07)
With respect to the LSC, it is requested to clarify what kind of know-how transfer in the
JCM procedures has been implemented.
(Summary of the response on CL07)
At the time of LSC, know-how related to JCM procedures such as preparing MoC,
emission reduction calculation using JCM methodology was provided.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL07)
Through reviewing the material and the minutes of the LSC meeting, it was confirmedthat the know-how related to JCM procedure including preparation of MoC, emission
reduction calculation was provided. Therefore, this issue was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the local stakeholder consultation of the proposed
JCM project was adequate.
11

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
Through reviewing the Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet, it was
confirmed that they are described based on the applied methodology BD-AM003 ver
01.0. Regarding the monitoring points, an issue was raised and resolved as section
below. With respect to the monitoring methods and procedures, the means of
implementation of the monitoring plan, including the data management and quality
assurance and quality control procedures, an issue was raised. Considering the project
participants response, the validation team closed the issue and raised a FAR.

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CAR01)
The monitoring point numbers are not described in the section C.2. Figure of allemission sources and monitoring points relevant to the JCM project.
(Summary of the response on CAR01)
Figure in Section C.2 has been revised to include monitoring point No. in line with
MPS.
(Assessment result of the responses on CAR01)
It was confirmed that the Figure in Section C.2 is revised appropriately. Therefore, thisissue was closed.
(Issue raised as CL05)
The measurement methods and procedures are not clearly stated in a project specificmanner in Table 1 Parameters to be monitored ex post. For example, it is not clearlystated which method is to be applied Method 1, Automated monitoring system, or
Method 2, Manual monitoring. It is requested to clarify the information flow, actual
allocation of role/responsibility within the monitoring structure described in themonitoring structure sheet. In addition, it is requested to clarify the frequency of
calibration for the measurement equipment.
(Summary of the response on CL05)
The project anticipates replacement of monitoring equipment before the monitoring
begins. The project participants wish to leave the text in line with the applied
12

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

methodology to keep all options allowed under the methodology.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL05)
Based on the PP response, the validation team determined that this issue is to be
confirmed during the first verification. Therefore, the validation team closed this issue
and instead raised FAR01.
(Issue raised as FAR01)
Corresponding to PP response to CL05, a FAR is raised in the validation process. It isrequested to establish the information flow, actual allocation of role/responsibility within
the monitoring structure, QA/QC procedures including calibration and record archiving
in line with the applied methodology and JCM guidelines. It is requested to describesuch information in the Monitoring Report Sheet appropriately for TPE's confirmation at
the first verification.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team confirmed that the project participants are to prepare theMonitoring Plan of the proposed JCM project complied with the requirements of themethodology and/or PDD and Monitoring Guidelines prior to the starting of themonitoring. The conformity of such monitoring requirements shall be confirmed in thecourse of assessment of PP response to FAR01 during the first verification.
C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
Through document review, it was confirmed that the Modalities of Communication(MoC), provided by one of the project participants, TTC, with whom JQA has acontractual relationship, had applied the latest version of MoC form. The date ofsubmission indicated in the MoC was 21/12/2017, and it was considered to be valid.
JQA also directly checked with the signatories of the Modalities of Communication(MoC), and then identified the personnel and their employment status, including thespecimen signatures. To do so, an issue was raised and resolved as mentioned below
section. As a result, JQA determined that the information of all project participants,
including the focal point provided in the MoC and its correctness of authority, wasappropriate.

13

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL08)
The MoC was submitted to JQA on 21/12/2017 together with the PDD for publiccomments. All the two entities listed as the PPs in the PDD are included in the MoC.
Both entities nominated as a focal point entity. JQA reviewed the website of each entity
and confirmed its identity. It is requested to provide evidence to enable the validationteam to check the personal identity including specimen signatures and employment
status for all project participants and focal points in the MoC.
(Summary of the response on CL08)
Evidence to enable the validation team to check the personal identity including
specimen signatures and employment status for all project participants and focal points
in the MoC have been provided.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL08)
Through reviewing the name cards together with the signature of all the focal points
and project participants, the validation team confirmed the validity and authority of the
MoC. Therefore, this issue was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team determined that the information of all project participants, including
the focal point provided in the MoC and its correctness of authority, was appropriate.
C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
It was confirmed preliminarily through review of the relevant website (e.g. UNFCCC
website, Markit Environmental Registry, etc.) that the proposed JCM project had notbeen registered under other international climate mitigation mechanisms. The written
confirmation of the avoidance of double registration was also provided through thesigned MoC, and was cross-checked through interview with the project participants,
with a satisfactory result.

<Findings>
14

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concluded that the proposed JCM project was not registeredunder the other international climate mitigation mechanisms at the stage of validation.
C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
In the PDD submitted for the invitation of public inputs as described in Section D, thestart date of operation is defined as 06/03/2017. Regarding the nature of this date, anissue was raised and resolved as mentioned in the section below. As a result, in therevised PDD, the project participants have changed the date to 24/06/2018. According
to PPs’ clarification, due to the technical difficulty on the compressor, replacement ofcompressor is expected to complete on 24/06/2018. Thus PPs has decided to set thestarting date of the project operation at the date when the replacement of compressor iscompleted. The revised starting date of operation 24/06/2018 is reasonable and thisdate is not before January 1, 2013

<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
(Issue raised as CL02)
The MoC was submitted to JQA on 21/12/2017 together with the PDD for publiccomments. All the two entities listed as the PPs in the PDD are included in the MoC.
Both entities nominated as a focal point entity. JQA reviewed the website of each entity
and confirmed its identity. It is requested to provide evidence to enable the validationteam to check the personal identity including specimen signatures and employment
status for all project participants and focal points in the MoC.
(Summary of the response on CL02)
Evidence to enable the validation team to check the personal identity including
specimen signatures and employment status for all project participants and focal points
in the MoC have been provided.
(Assessment result of the responses on CL02)15

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Through reviewing the name cards together with the signature of all the focal points
and project participants, the validation team confirmed the validity and authority of the
MoC. Therefore, this issue was closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
The validation team concludes that the start of the operating date of the proposed JCM
project has been defined appropriately.
C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No other issue was identified.
<Findings>
Please state if CARs, CLs, or FARs are raised, and how they are resolved.
No outstanding issue was raised.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
Not applicable.

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
The PDD of the proposed JCM project, which was submitted in line with the Project
Cycle Procedure, was made publicly available through the JCM website for public
inputs. This call for public comments is open from 22/12/2017 to 20/01/2018. The
specific JCM website is as below:
https://www.jcm.go.jp/bd-jp/information/246

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
No comment was received during the period of the public comments; therefore, noaction was required to be taken into due account by PPs.

16

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees

Mr. Akio Ouchi, Assistant Manager, Industrial Machinery Group, Machinery Project
Department, Toyota Tsusho Corporation

Ms. Chisato Nakade, Senior consultant, Clean Energy Finance Division,
Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.

E.2. List of documents received
1

Project Design Document (draft)(JCM_BD_F_PDD_ver02.0_AJL_ver01.docx)

2

Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (draft)(JCM_BD_AM003_ver01.0_AJL_ver01.xlsx)

3

Modalities of communications statement, a validated version for submission ofrequest for registration

4

Joint Crediting Mechanism Approved Methodology BD_AM003“Energy efficiency improvement through the introduction of energy efficient air
jet looms in textile industry”(JCM_BD_AM003_ver01.0.pdf)

5

Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet BD_AM003(JCM_BD_AM003_ver01.0.xlsx)

6

JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_BD_Glossary_ver02.0.pdf)

7

JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_BD_PCP_ver02.0.pdf)

8

JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form
(JCM_BD_F_MoC_ver01.0.pdf)

9

JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring
Report (JCM_BD_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0.pdf)

10 JCM Project Design Document Form
(JCM_BD_F_PDD_ver03.0.pdf)
11 JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification(JCM_BD_GL_VV_ver02.0.pdf)
12 JCM Validation Report Form
(JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0.docx)
13 Hamid Fabrics Annual reporthttps://www.hfl.com.bd/annual_report.php
15 Company profile of Toyota Tsusho Corporation
16 Commissioning report17

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

17 The statutory useful life for the calculation of depreciation and amortization
provided by Ministry of Finance of Japan
18 Brochure and specification of the project air jet loom, JAT810
19 "Weekly greasing & oiling schedule record" and "Monthly preventive
maintenance status"
20 Electric line diagram of the project
21 The Environment Conservation Rules, 1997, Bangladesh
22 The minutes of the local stakeholder consultation meeting, including theinvitation letter and the attendees' list
23 Presentation materials for the local stakeholder consultation
24 Source of total electricity consumption by the motors and air compressors of
the project air jet looms during period p
26 Letter on the CO2 emission factor for the grid electricity in Bangladesh issued
by Ministry of Environment, Government of the People's Republic ofBangladesh dated 19/08/2013
28 Project Design Document (final)(JCM_BD_F_PDD_ver03.0_BD003_ver03.docx)
29 Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet (final)(JCM_BD_AM003_ver01.0_AJL_ver03.xlsx)

18

JCM_BD_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers

19