1

BIOTERRORISM EVIDENCE

Evidence that an international corporate criminal syndicate,
which has annexed high government office inside the UnitedStates, is intent on carrying out a mass genocide against thepeople of the United States by using an artificial (genetic) flu
pandemic virus and a forced vaccination program
to cause mass death and injury and depopulate America inorder to transfer control of the United Statesto WHO, the UN and affiliated security forces (UN troops
from countries such as China, Canada, the UK and Mexico
etc).

2

Contents

I. Introduction: Summary of Claims
II. Factual BackgroundIII. Evidence the “swine flu“ vaccines meets the criteria for definition as “bioweapons”
IV. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” virus is an artificial (genetically engineered) virus
V. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu killer virusof 1918
VI. Genome sequence of the “swine flu”
VII. Evidence as to the role of Baxter and WHO in producing and releasing 72 kilos of lethal
pandemic virus material in Austria, nearly triggering a pandemic this winter
VIII. Evidence Baxter is an element in a covert bioweapons network: Baxter officers
IX. Evidence Baxter has deliberately contaminated drugs
X. Evidence Novartis is using vaccines as bioweapons.
XI. Evidence as to the WHO’s role in the bioweapons program: supplier of the bird flu virus to
BaxterXII. Evidence as to deliberate release of the “swine flu” virus in Mexico
XIII. Evidence as to the involvement of President Obama
XIV. Evidence as to WHO’s manipulation of disease data in order to justify declaring a Pandemic
Level 6 in order to seize control of the USA
XV. Evidence as to FDA’s role in covering up the bioweapons program
XVI. Evidence as to the Canada’s National Microbiology Labs role in the bioweapons program
XVI. Evidence of the involvement of scientists working for the UK’s NIBSC, and the CDC inengineering the swine flu
XVII. Evidence vaccinations caused the Spanish killer flu of 1918: a lack of quality control thenas now
XVIII. Precedents: the abandoned swine flu mass vaccination program of 1976
XIX. Inadequate performance of the government in stopping the spread of the swine flu as coverfor spreading a pandemic: evidence as to lax controls at government labs (Fort Detrick)
XX. Evidence as to manipulation of the legal framework to allow mass vaccination by force

3
XXII. Constitutional issues: the legality v. illegality of jeopardising the Life, Health and “Publicgood” by mass vaccinations
XXI. The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime
XXII. Evidence as to the use of chemtrails for as an element in a larger biological warfare against
the target US population
XXIII. Evidence as to the existence of an international corporate crime syndicate
XXIV. Evidence as to the existence of the “Illuminati” and to a pattern of activities that violate
laws on racketeering influenced organised crime
XXV. Evidence of the Illuminati’s involvement in the current collapse of the world’s financial
system
XXVI. Evidence as to the depopulation agenda of the Illuminati/Bilderbergs and theirinvolvement in the engineering and release of “flu” pandemic virus
XXVII. Evidence as to a genocide agenda by means of weaponised flu being discussed at theannual Bilderberg meeting in Athens from May 14-17, 2009
XXVIII. Evidence as to the profits of pharmaceutical companies in the event of a pandemic
XXIX. Adjuvants: Evidence that the swine flu vaccine is planned to cause harm
XXX. Conclusion
XXXI. Defendants

4
I. Introduction: Summary of Claims

There is evidence that an international corporate criminal syndicate, which has annexed highgovernment office at Federal and State level, is intent on carrying out a mass genocide against thepeople of the United States by using an artificial (genetic) flu pandemic virus and forced vaccine
program to cause mass death and injury and depopulate America in order to transfer control of theUnited States to the United Nations and affiliated security forces (UN troops from countries suchas China, Canada, the UK and Mexico).
There is proof many organisations – World Health Organisation, UN as well as vaccine companies
such as Baxter and Novartis – are part of a single system under the control of a core criminalgroup, who give the strategic leadership, and who have also funded the development,
manufacturing and release of artificial viruses in order to justify mass vaccinations with abioweapon substance in order to eliminate the people of the USA, and so gain control of theassets, resources etc of North America.
The motivation for the crime is classical robbery followed by murder although the scale andmethod are new in history.
The core group sets its strategic goals and operative priorities in secret using committees such as
the Trilateral Commission, and in person to person contact in the annual Bilderberg meeting. It
can be identified as the “Illuminati”, a mafia-like group with family dynasties at its center.
Speicfically, evidence is presented that Defendants President Barack Obama, President of theUnited States, David Nabarro, UN System Coordinator for Influenza, Margaret Chan, DirectorGeneral of World Health Organisation, Kathleen Sibelius, Secretary of Department of Health andHuman Services (HHS), Secretary Janet Napolitano, the Department of Homeland Security,
David de Rotschild, banker, David Rockefeller, banker, George Soros, banker, and Alois Stöger,Austrian Health Minister, among others, are part of this international corporate crimine syndicate
which has, marching as one phalanx to carry out their plan of genocide, have developed,
produced, stockpiled and used biological weapons to eliminate the population of the United States
for financial and political gain.
Evidence is presented for contending that the defandants did conspire with each other and withothers to devise, fund and participate in the final phase of the implementation of a covert
international bioweapons program involving, among other entities, the pharmaceutical companies
Baxter and Novartis, by first instructing for the bioenginneering and, then release of lethal
biological agents, specifically, the so-called “bird flu” virus and, the “so-called” swine flu virus, inorder to have a pretext to implement a forced mass vaccination programme, which will be themeans for the administration of a toxic biological agent using the delivery system of an injection,so causing death and injury to the people of the United States in violation of the Biological
Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 (BWATA) passed into law in 1990, which extended thescope of bio-warfare materials regulation to include private individuals and non-stateorganizations, including corporations.
There is clear, verifiable and unambiguous proof that Baxter AG, Austrian subsidiary of Baxter
International, based in Deerfield, Ill, deliberately, wilfully and knowingly, sent out 72 kilos of live
bird flu virus as one the most deadly bioweapons and supplied by the World Health Organisation,
Geneva, Switzerland in the winter of 2009 to 16 laboratories in four countries and so nearly
triggered a pandemic.

5
There is strong evidence that this event was part of a covert biological warfare against the targeted
US population by infiltrating a spectrum of organisations so that they actually march as one
phalanx to carry out their plan of genocide.
The defendants have created, resourced and sustained a covert bioweapons system for purposes ofmass murder with the help of the
-

WHO
EU
National research labs such as the CDC
Vaccine companies
FEMA
Homeland Security

These organisations are interacting with each other to develop and distribute biological weapons
in secret.
They have leveraged funding through the banking system as well as through the drug trade they
control.
They have leveraged technology to improve their capability to use biological agents to eliminate
the population of the US by developing genetic viruses such as the bird flu and swine flu virus inlabs.
They have developed vaccine companies to deliver the biological agents to the population throughvaccines, which will be compulsory in the event of a pandemic.
They have positioned themselves to profit from any pandemic they themselves create by securing
funding and lucrative contracts for “anti dote” vaccines with governments and internationalorganisations such as WHO far in advance.
They have implemented an illegal and unconstitutional regulatory framework to compel people toaccept mass vaccinations so that the people of America will not be allowed to refuse an untested
vaccine and they will not be allowed to sue for compensation.
They have installed a covert infrastructure of genocide in the USA, including FEMA camps withincinerators and mass graves.
They have trained police and other security and health organisations such as Homeland Security
and FEMA to carry out the programme of genocide, and to target American patriots calling for a
return to the Constitution as terrorists.
They use organisations such as the CIA and the Freemasons, and means such as offshore bankaccounts and blackmail, to carry out their covert plans.
They have made use of their control of the mainstream media to ensure that the people of America
are given faulty information about the pandemic and so are more likely to accept the vaccinesfrom the very same companies suspected of being involved in starting those same pandemics.
By eliminating the US population, they aim to acquire the resources and assets of the country at
relatively little expense and without being held accountable because the programme of genocide isdisguised as a necessary public health measure by the media and government agents they control.

6
They aim to introduce a new North American Union, including Canada and Mexico, under theauthority of the Federal Reserve and patrolled by UN troops to maximise their political andeconomic control of the USA.
Specifically, evidence is presented that the vaccine company Baxter’s Austrian subsidiarydeliberately released live bird flu virus in February, 2009, nearly triggering a pandemic.
According to § 175 (a) of BWATA, there is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense
under this section committed by or against a national of the United States
The amount of material was 72 kilograms.
This material was sent to 16 labs in four countries under a false label.
The 72 kilos of live bird flu virus was destined for the seasonal flu vaccine.
The deadly mixture of live bird flu virus and human flu virus were mixed in a Biosecurity level 3
facility, where basic protocol and procedures would make it impossible to ever mix a live virus
bioweapon with vaccine material by accident.
The mixture was a super-wide spectrum combination H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and live,
unlabeled H5N1 viruses. If both strains were to incubate and recombine in a human host, a virus
could mutate via "reassortment" into a virulent airborne weapon that would cause a pandemic.
The material was not radiated before it was sent out, leaving the deadly virus alive.
It was only detected when a lab member in a lab in the Czech Republic tested a portion on ferrets
and these died.
Lab staff in Austria and the Czech Republic were subsequently given preventative treatment
against the bird flu in hospitals in Vienna, Austria.
There is evidence the Austrian Health Minister is involved in a cover up because he sent a vet to
examine the incident and Baxter was given a green light to continue as before.
WHO supplied the live bird flu virus which Baxter used in its 72 kilos of contaminated material.
WHO has supplied the funding, licences and regulatory framework for the development of thebird flu virus in labs and the “anti-dote” vaccine.
WHO has deliberately and systematically suppressed and manipulated scientific facts on the virus
and vaccines to serve the interests of the international crime syndicate group.
WHO issues talking points and statements that are propagandist in style and designed to sway
public opinion in favour of the vaccine.
WHO has rushed to declare a pandemic level 6 in disregard for the science in order to justify
commandeering, together with the UN, national US government agencies and authorities, setting
up a control center in the WHO Pandemic Control Room which has supercomputers linked to theUN.
WHO redefined “Pandemic” as “Widespread, spreading from human to human but notparticularly dangerous” changing it from its previous definition of “widespread, rapidly spreading
and very dangerous.

7

Legislation is in place which would require Americans to either submit to vaccination once a
pandemic is declared by either the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Governor of yourState or both.
Refuse this vaccine and you will find yourself confined either as a felon without benefit of judge
or jury if the offence is a State level one, or involuntarily incarcerated in Federal FEMA holding
camps if the offence is a Federal one.
If you are in the US, entering or leaving the US at that time, will be to either submit to aweaponized substance being injected into our bodies or involuntary detention.
You will have no right to claim compensation in case of death or injury from the vaccination
under special immunity laws.
WHO has rushed to give companies such as Baxter funding and contracts to develop the swine flu
vaccine in spite of the fact that Baxter was mixed 72 kilos of live bird flu with human flu vaccine
material in a BSL-3 facility, failed to radiate it and sent it out to 16 labs in four countries as for theseasonal flu vaccine material locations.
About eight weeks later, a genetically engineered virus for a worldwide interspecies flu pandemic
breaks out close to Baxter’s facilities in Mexico City and the same company is given contracts to
produce vaccines for the outbreak.
Furthermore, Novartis, which caused the death of at least 21 homeless people in Poland due totheir fully licensed bird flu vaccine has been awarded huge contracts by WHO and othergovernments.
The swine flu virus is an artificial, lab engineered and there is evidence it was released from a lab.
The vaccine for it will be produced in cell cultures that have been responsible for viruses such as
AIDs.
Dangerous adjuvants such as squalene are to be added.
There is evidence that key members of the international criminal corporate syndicate discussed
depopulation at their annual Bilderberg meeting in Greece attended by David Rockefeller.
The financial links between Illuminati crime gang members such as the Rockefellers and theRothschilds and WHO, the UN and the EU as well as the banks that hold shares in vaccine
companies, in media and in offshore banking appear to be extremely complex and needinvestigation by the appropriate law enforcement agencies.

8
II. Factual Background
1. Timeline and facts that establish probbale cause

A.

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, the NATIONAL SECURITYPRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL
DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20 and other laws.

1. NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and HOMELAND
SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20 allows the governors in each state tosuspend the government and law and, among other things, confiscate and destroy facilities andresources in the interest of the public health without compensation to the owners, per Article IV
Section 402(a). The State Legislatures are barred from intervening for a period of 60 days.
2. Under the National Emergency Act, the President "may seize property, organize and control themeans of production, seize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute martial law, seize
and control all transportation and communication, regulate the operation of private enterprise,
restrict travel, and, in a variety of ways, control the lives of United States citizens."
3.. NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 have created the position of National Continuity Coordinator without any
specific act of Congress authorizing the position.
4. NSPD-51/ HSPD-20 appears to negate any a requirement that the President submit to Congressa determination that a national emergency exists, suggesting instead that the powers of theexecutive order can be implemented without any congressional approval or oversight.
http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/laws/gc_1219263961449.shtm#1
5. The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act has been adopted in 38 States makes it amisdemeanor to a felony to refuse to take amandated vaccine.
6. Legislation would require Americans to either submit to vaccination once a Pandemic State is
declared by either the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Governor of your State orboth.
Refuse this vaccine and you will find yourself confined either as a felon without benefit of judge
or jury if the offense is a State level one, or involuntarily incarcerated in Federal FEMA holding
camps if the offense is a Federal one.
Law enforcement officers are allowed to use deadly force against felony suspects.
If you are in the US, entering or leaving the US at that time, will be to either submit to aweaponized substance being injected into our bodies or involuntary detention.
7. The "Model State Emergency Heath Powers Act" allows the Government to seize and/or
quarantine a town and all the people within it.
For the specific versions of that Act enacted in each individual state see
http://www.publicealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA%20Surveillance.pdf(Model State Emergency Health Powers Act)
http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/states/stateplans.html

9
Once a town is quarantined, the government is allowed to seize all property and seize the rights ofthe people to resist government i.e. confiscating all civilian owned firearms.
8. People who suffer death or injury as a result of a government-mandated vaccine will be barredfrom seeking compensation under immunity provisions.
9. Section 63, Vaccination and Treatment of The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, A
Checklist of Issues, indicates those unwilling to submit to a vaccine will be subject to isolation orquarantine. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/modelact.pdf
10. Mandatory vaccine simulation drills are planned for at least three states including Texas, Ohioand Alaska. (Maloney, County plans to deal with unthinkable, 2009)http://www.seguingazette.com/story.lasso?ewcd=7067c6003405a409
11. The Massachusetts Legislature is fast-tracking legislation for Martial Law and mandatory
vaccines in response to the current „swine flu outbreak“. (AP, 2009)http://news.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/2009_04_28_Mass__Senate_approves_pandemi
c_flu_prep_bill/
12. Any physician or other health care provider who refuses to perform medical examination or
vaccinations as directed shall be liable for delicensure and the inability to continue to practice in
the State.
13. the Act criminalizes refusal of medical treatment, making citizens liable for a misdemeanor ifthey refuse mandatory vaccines, per Article V Section 504(b). The Act gives the public healthauthority the right to isolate or quarantine a person on an ex parte court order, with no hearing forat least 72 hours. If the public health authority decides that an unvaccinated person is a risk toothers, even if uninfected, he could be quarantined, per Article V Section 503(e).
14. The Act removes the States accountability for harm or deaths resulting from mandatory
vaccines citing the state immunity clause: "Neither the State, its political subdivisions, nor, except
in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct, the Governor, the public health authority, or
any other State official referenced in this Act, is liable for the death of or any injury to persons, or
damage to property, as a result of complying with or attempting to comply with this Act or any
rule or regulations promulgated pursuant to this Act," per Article VIII Section 804.
15. President Bush announced a new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza
to a High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York on Sept. 14, 2005.
The 2005 plan, operative until Bush announced the International Partnership on Avian andPandemic Influenza, directed the State Department to work with the WHO and U.N.
http://www.hhs.gov/pandemicflu/plan/appendixh.html
16. The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America Summit in Canada released a planthat establishes U.N. law along with regulations by the World Trade Organization and World
Health Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the stage formilitarizing the management of continental health emergencies.
17. the SPP plan gives primacy for avian and pandemic influenza management to plans developedby the WHO, WTO, U.N. and NAFTA directives – not to decisions made by U.S. agencies.
18. the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, has created a web page dedicated to avian flu
and has been running exercises in preparation for the possible use of U.S. military forces in a10continental domestic emergency involving avian flu or pandemic influenza.
19. All 194 nation-states (members of U.N.) had until June 2007 to implement the WHO revised
International Health Regulations (IHR) -- revised in 2005, which included passage of legislation
empowering state surveillance and monitoring of their citizens under the guise of a potential
worldwide pandemic (smallpox, polio, SARS or human cases of new strains of influenza).
Stockpiling specific vaccines and anti-viral medications are part of compliance with IHR.
20. The U.N.-WHO-WTO-NAFTA plan advanced by SPP features a prominent role for the U.N.
system influenza coordinator as a central international director in the case of a North American
avian flu or pandemic influenza outbreak.
21. in Sept. 2005, Dr. David Nabarro was appointed the first U.N. system influenza coordinator, aposition which also places him as a senior policy adviser to the U.N. director-general. Nabarro
joined the WHO in 1999 and was appointed WHO executive director of sustainable development
and health environments in July 2002.
22. In a Sept. 29, 2005, press conference at the U.N., Nabarro made clear that his job was toprepare for the H5N1 virus, known as the avian flu.
He quantified the deaths he expected as follows: "I'm not, at the moment at liberty to give you aprediction on numbers, but I just want to stress, that, let's say, the range of deaths could beanything from 5 to 150 million."
23. The National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, signed on May 9, 2007
declares that in the event of a “catastrophic event”, George W. Bush can become what is best
described as "a dictator":"The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional
government."
This directive gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government andthe country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers. The directive
also placed the Secretary of Homeland Security in charge of domestic “security”.
“(1) this directive establishes a comprehensive national policy on the continuity of Federal
Government structures and operations and a single National Continuity Coordinator responsible
for coordinating the development and implementation of Federal continuity policies. This policy
establishes "National Essential Functions," prescribes continuity requirements for all executive
departments and agencies, and provides guidance for State, local, territorial, and tribal
governments, and private sector organizations in order to ensure a comprehensive and integrated
national continuity program that will enhance the credibility of our national security posture andenable a more rapid and effective response to and recovery from a national emergency.
24.(b) "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results inextraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S.
population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions.“

B. World Health Organization (WHO) and U.N.

11
25. The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN)that acts as a coordinating authority on international public health. Established on 7 April 1948,
and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the agency inherited the mandate and resources of its
predecessor, the Health Organization, which had been an agency of the League of Nations.
26. The WHO's constitution states that its objective "is the attainment by all peoples of the highest
possible level of health."
27. The WHO and UN will become the controlling agencies in the US in the event of a declared
pandemic level 6.
28. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a global influenza preparedness plan,
which defines the stages of a pandemic, outlines WHO's role and makes recommendations fornational measures before and during a pandemic.
PhasesWHO Pandemic Influenza Phases (2009)[80]Phase

Description

Phase 1

No animal influenza virus circulating among animals have been reported to cause
infection in humans.

Phase 2An animal influenza virus circulating in domesticated or wild animals is known to havecaused infection in humans and is therefore considered a specific potential pandemic
threat.

Phase 3An animal or human-animal influenza reassortant virus has caused sporadic cases orsmall clusters of disease in people, but has not resulted in human-to-humantransmission sufficient to sustain community-level outbreaks.

Phase 4

Human to human transmission of an animal or human-animal influenza reassortantvirus able to sustain community-level outbreaks has been verified.

Phase 5

Human-to-human spread of the virus in two or more countries in one WHO region.

Phase 6

In addition to the criteria defined in Phase 5, the same virus spreads from human-tohuman in at least one other country in another WHO region.

Post peak
periodLevels of pandemic influenza in most countries with adequate surveillance have
dropped below peak levels.

Post

Levels of influenza activity have returned to the levels seen for seasonal influenza in12pandemic
periodmost countries with adequate surveillance.

29. "Efforts by the federal government to prepare for pandemic influenza at the national level
include a $100 million DHHS initiative in 2003 to build U.S. vaccine production.
30. Several agencies within Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) — including the
Office of the Secretary, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, and the National Instituteof Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — are in the process of working with vaccine
manufacturers to facilitate production of pilot vaccine lots for both H5N1 and H9N2 strains aswell as contracting for the manufacturing of 2 million doses of an H5N1 vaccine.
31. On October 27, 2005, the Department of Health and Human Services awarded a $62.5 million
contract to Chiron Corporation to manufacture an avian influenza vaccine designed to protect
against the H5N1 influenza virus strain. This followed a previous awarded $100 million contract
to sanofi pasteur, the vaccines business of the sanofi-aventis Group, for avian flu vaccine.
32. According to The New York Times as of March 2006, "governments worldwide have spentbillions planning for a potential influenza pandemic: buying medicines, running disaster drills,[and] developing strategies for tighter border controls" due to the H5N1 threat.[83]33. In October 2005, President Bush urged bird flu vaccine manufacturers to increase theirproduction.[94]34. On November 1, 2005 President Bush submitted a request to Congress for $7.1 billion to
begin implementing the National Strategy To Safeguard Against The Danger of Pandemic
Influenza. The request includes $251 million to detect and contain outbreaks before they spreadaround the world; $2.8 billion to accelerate development of cell-culture technology; $800 million
for development of new treatments and vaccines; $1.519 billion for the Departments of Healthand Human Services (HHS) and Defense to purchase influenza vaccines; $1.029 billion to
stockpile antiviral medications; and $644 million to ensure that all levels of government are
prepared to respond to a pandemic outbreak.[96]35. On 6 March 2006, Mike Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human Services, said U.S. healthagencies are continuing to develop vaccine alternatives that will protect against the evolving avian
influenza virus.[97]C. 2009 Swine flu outbreak
36. In March and April 2009, an outbreak of a new strain of influenza commonly referred to as"swine flu" infected many people in Mexico and other parts of the world.
37. The new strain was first diagnosed in two children by the CDC, first on April 14 in San Diego
County, California and a few days later in nearby Imperial County, California.[78] Neither child
had been in contact with pigs.

13
38. The outbreak was first detected in Mexico City, where surveillance began picking up a surge
in cases of influenza-like illness (ILI) starting March 18.[80]39. On April 18.[85] The Mexican cases were confirmed by the CDC and the World HealthOrganization to be a new strain of H1N1.[80][86]40. Cases were also reported in the states of San Luis Potosí, Hidalgo, Querétaro and Mexico
State.[87] Mexican Health Minister José Ángel Córdova on April 24, said "We’re dealing with a
new flu virus that constitutes a respiratory epidemic that so far is controllable."[87] Mexican news
media speculate that the outbreak may have started in February near a Smithfield Foods pig plant
amid complaints about its intensive farming practices,[88][89] although no pigs in Mexico havetested positive for the virus.[citation needed]
41. The first death from swine flu occurred on April 13, when a diabetic woman from Oaxaca diedfrom respiratory complications.[91][92] The Mexican fatalities are alleged to be mainly young adultsof 25 to 45.
42. Although by late April there had been reports of 152 "probable deaths"[94] in Mexico, theWHO had received reports of only 7 confirmed deaths as of April 29 and explicitly denied thelarger figure.[95][96]43. Mexico's Health Secretary declared that around 100 early suspected deaths from swine flu
could not be confirmed because samples were not taken.[5]44. Cases were first discovered in the U.S. and officials soon suspected a link between thoseincidents and an earlier outbreak of late-season flu cases in Mexico. Within days hundreds ofsuspected cases, some of them fatal, were discovered in Mexico, with yet more cases found in the
U.S. and several other countries in the Northern Hemisphere. Soon thereafter, the U.N.'s World
Health Organization (WHO), along with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), expressed concern that the A(H1N1) could become a worldwide flu pandemic, and WHOthen raised its pandemic disease alert level to "Phase 5" out of the six maximum, as a "signal thata pandemic is at the imminent level".
45. According to a Summary of latest H1N1 developments in the United States by Alexander S
Jones May 19, 2009A) H1N1 may have killed an infant in New York who developed cyanosis with rapid progression
to death. This is an ominous parallel to 1918. This suggests viral pneumonia, but we have no
confirmation. Whether this is from the New York 'consensus strain' or a new recombinant,mutant, or reassortant is unknown at this time.
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105092
http://www.myfoxny.com/dpp/health/swine_flu/090519_second_possible_death_from_swine_flu_
in_new_york_city
B) Dr. Niman has estimated there are currently 1 - 10 million infections in the United States. This
matches my own assessment. With a case fatality rate of 0.1%, we can expect 1000 - 10000 deaths-- although it has become clear at this point the authorities are covering up the spread of the virus.
With a case fatality rate of 0.4%, we can expect 4000 - 40000 deaths.
http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05180901/Swine_H1N1_Japan_6.html

14C) H1N1 is rapidly spreading in schools. The articles I have pasted below are only the tip of theiceberg -- this is across the country at this point.
Lowell had 123 students call in sick Monday and sent another 71 home with fevers and other flulike symptoms, the representative said
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105174
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2009/05/18/daily24.html
The Dana Hall School in Wellesley has been shuttered for the next week after nearly 100 students
and staff called in sick with fevers, sore throats, and other flu-like systems.
A spokeswoman for Dana Hall School in Wellesley said Tuesday there is no indication that swine
flu is what prompted 90 students and eight faculty and staff members to call in sick on Monday,
but the move was made after consulting with state and local public health officials.
A spokeswoman for the state Public Health Department says there are no confirmed swine flu
cases at the school and no one associated with the school is being tested for the disease.
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=235635#post235635
http://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/wellesley/2009/05/flu_closes_dana_hall_school_in.html
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/2009_05_19_Wellesley_school_closes_after_ra
sh_of_illnesses/srvc=home&position=recentD) There has been a death from a possible lethal coinfection, a dangerous event suggesting worse
is to come -- see the case of the death from pneumonia of an oil platform worker who tested
positive for multiple strains of the flu.
Possible Swine Flu Death in Little RockReported by: KARK 4 News
Monday, May 18, 2009
The death of a 28-year-old man in a Little Rock hospital over the weekend could be linked to the
H1N1 virus better known as Swine Flu.
That's according to Pulaski County Coroner Garland Camper , who tells KARK 4 that the man's
autopsy revealed he had suffered from more than one strain of flu. Camper calls that "somewhat
unusual."Camper says the man was an offshore oil worker who had been in the hospital with flu-like
symptoms, and had reportedly been ill for weeks.
http://arkansasmatters.com/content/fulltext/news/?cid=222431
E) Data has become available from case studies in California , from H1N1 hospitalizations.
15/25 patients have lung infiltrates, almost half have vomiting... this is somewhat disturbing.
The best predictive symptoms based on this data are:1) Fever (97%)2) Cough (77%)

153) Lung infiltrates (60%)4) Vomiting (46%)5) Shortness of breath (43%)#3 and #4 are unusual for influenza
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?p=235601#post235601

F) An article in Science from last week estimated the H1N1 case fatality rate is 0.4% -- four times
higher than seasonal flu.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-05/icl-sfe051109.php
G) The ER in New York has become overwhelmed with patients -- on Tuesday, seeing double thenumber of children who present with respiratory symptoms.
Alan D. Aviles, the president of the city’s Health and Hospitals Corporation, said that emergency
admissions were running about 50 percent higher than usual for adults and “more than 100
percent above average” for children.
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showpost.php?p=235577&postcount=23
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/toddlers-death-stokes-flu-concerns/?hp
46. "The first case was seen in Mexico on April 13. The outbreak coincided with the President
Barack Obama’s trip to Mexico City on April 16. Obama was received at Mexico’s anthropology
museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, a distinguished archeologist who died the following dayfrom symptoms similar to flu, Reforma newspaper reported. The newspaper didn’t confirm if
Solis had swine flu or not. "http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=worldwide
47. The Paris-based World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) said April 27th that virus
currently circulating in Mexico and the United States and which has killed at least 20 people had
never been found before in any animal and was completely new.
"The virus has not been isolated in animals to date. Therefore, it is not justified to name thisdisease swine flu," the OIE said in a press statement.
The virus "includes in its characteristics swine, avian and human virus components," the OIE said,
and urged that it be called "North American influenza," after its geographic origin.
The OIE said it was "urgent" that scientific research be carried out to determine the susceptibilityof animals to what it said was a "new virus."
48. The new strain is an apparent reassortment of four strains of influenza A virus subtype
H1N1.[64] Analysis by the CDC identified the four component strains as one endemic in humans,
one endemic in birds, and two endemic in pigs (swine).
49. Alexander S Jones, former employee the NIH, has analyzed the genome sequence of the virus
and concluded we “must seriously consider a laboratory origin for this virus”.
“BLAST sequence homology of 'swine flu' indicates both the Hemagglutinin(HA) surface protein as well as the Non-structural (NS1) interferon
Inhibition proteins are novel recombinants previously unidentified in nature.

16
Both these influenza proteins, based on the genetic sequences released Friday May 1st by the U.S.
Centers of Disease Control (CDC), share their closest genetic identity with turkey (avian) and pig(swine) strains from multiple continents including North America as well as Asia. Even the closest
matches indicate 5% previously unidentified genetic material.
I submit this evidence, coupled with the lack of the presence of this virus at the pig farm near the
proposed CDC's "patient zero" (a 5 year old from La Gloria, 80km away from the pig farm in
Perote, Mexico), shows that the origin of the flu outbreak remains unidentified at this time, andcannot be ascribed to Mexican or North American swine.
Furthermore, I submit that since 5% of both these influenza A RNA sequences share no known
homology in any public databases (in addition to the avian/swine hybrid nature of both these
critical genes), that we must seriously consider a laboratory origin for this virus.
Future research that may be promising includes identifying critical SNPs, especially in the PB2
and the NS1 coding regions which may be markers for evolution of pathogen virulence, andshould be closely monitored. The hemagglutinin protein should also be monitored for acquisitionof a poly-basic amino acid site which would give the virus pantrophic properties as in the 1918
pandemic. “(Alexander S Jones)
50. The World Health Organization on May 11 said leading vaccine producers including Baxter,
Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Aventis had requested “wild type virus” samples of the A(H1N1) or swine flu virus. MedImmune, which is now part of AstraZeneca, Baxter, CSL andSolvay are also being sent samples, as are smaller developers Microgen, Nobilon International,
Omnivest Vaccines and Vivaldi. The WHO is co-coordinating scientific discussions over the virus,
and has said that, within the next few weeks, it is likely to make a recommendation on whether
and how to produce a pandemic vaccine.
51. Latest Pandemic Time Estimates, based on Los Alamos Flu Simulation
http://www.lanl.gov/news/images/bird4x3red.mov
by Alexander S Jones*using baseline U.S. zero day of April 20th, 2009

Monday April 20
Monday April 27
Monday May 4
Monday May 11
Monday May 18
Monday May 25
Monday June 1
Monday June 8
Monday June 15
Monday June 22
Monday June 29
Monday July 6
Monday July 13
Tuesda July 14
Wednes July 15
Thursd July 16

Day 1
Day 7
Day 14
Day 21
Day 28
Day 35
Day 42
Day 49 <-- WHO Declares Phase 6 (by Day 53, aka by Friday June 12th)
Day 56
Day 63 <-- Cases Go Exponential (by Day 60, aka by Friday June 19th)
Day 70Day 77
Day 84
Day 85
Day 86
Day 87 <-- Wave 1 Outbreak Peaks (by Day 87, aka by Thursday July 16th)

17

Wave 2 Outbreak Peaks at +90 days, so approx mid-October
52. The CDC announced on 10 Jun 2009 that in the event of a pandemic, flights would be
rerouted to Miami International Airport and 18 other major U.S. airports, according to plans by
the CDC. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has set up stand-by
quarantine/screening facilities at the 19 airports to which all flights from affected countries would
be diverted.
53. WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan announced that the World Health Organisation israising its pandemic alert to phase 6 on Thursday, June 11th.
54. The WHO Pandemic Six level declaration entitles President Obama to impose martial law anddeploy FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security "Pandemic Task Forces". Each State
Governor will be notified that the provisions of the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act(MSEHPA) will be implemented. This means that all Americans must consent to massvaccinations, or be guilty of a felony crime. The legal situation is that anyone who refuses thevaccine, and/or resists forced relocation to a prepared "quarantine compound", can "legally" be
shot and killed because police are allowed to use „deadly fiorce“ against felony suspects.

18III. Evidence the “swine flu“ vaccines are bioweapons

The “bird flu” has been classified by the United States government in its own export regulations
as a biological weapon, and there are grounds for believing the “swine flu”, likewise, is abioengineered virus and a component of a biological weapons system as defined by Section 175(a) of BWATA designed, like the “bird flu”, to deliver toxins and microorganisms so as todeliberately inflict disease on death on people while being disguised as injections for prophylactic,
protective, or other peaceful purposes.
Commerce Department regulations supplement listing pathogens whose vaccines are subject toexport restrictions for countries classified as sponsors of terrorism (see pages 57-60, 70)
http://www.access.gpo.gov/bis/ear/pdf/ccl1.pdf
The United States bars the export of vaccines for the bird flu, smallpox, yellow fever, and manyother pathogens to five countries classified as sponsors of terrorism.
Under Department of Commerce rules, a long list of vaccines for viruses, bacteria, and biologicaltoxins cannot be exported to Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria unless they obtain aspecial export license, which can take weeks.
The list of pathogens subject to the rules includes viruses that cause dengue fever, Ebola fever,Marburg fever, Rift Valley fever, and monkeypox. A list of animal pathogens covered by the
restrictions includes highly pathogenic bird flu viruses. Bacterial pathogens on the restricted list
include anthrax and the microbes that cause tularemia and plague. Not on the list are the causes ofcommon vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, andseasonal influenza.
The Associated Press reports that vaccines for bird flu are barred from being expoerted to nationsclassified as terrorist.
“Deep inside the United States export regulations is a single sentence that bars U.S. exports ofvaccines for avian bird flu and dozens of other viruses to five countries designated "state sponsorsof terrorism."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081011/ap_on_re_as/as_bird_flu_biological_warfare;_ylt=An9Wo
LAijbbjeNwhYV6N98Ws0NUE
US controls bird flu vaccines over bioweapon fears
By ROBIN McDOWELL, Associated Press Writer Sat Oct 11, 7:14 AM ET
When Indonesia's health minister stopped sending bird flu viruses to a research laboratory in the
U.S. for fear Washington could use them to make biological weapons, Defense Secretary Robert
Gates laughed and called it "the nuttiest thing" he'd ever heard.
Yet deep inside an 86-page supplement to United States export regulations is a single sentencethat bars U.S. exports of vaccines for avian bird flu and dozens of other viruses to five countries
designated "state sponsors of terrorism."
The reason: Fear that they will be used for biological warfare.
So, the United States government views vaccines as tools of biological warfare, giving indirectconfirmation to the fears of the Indonesian Health Minister.

19
Furthermore, Ex-HHS Secretary Mike O. Leavitt refused to provide BIRD FLU VACCINES
created by contract with Sanofi-Pasteur to rogue "terrorist" nations like Iran, North Korea, andSyria solely because the VACCINE could be used as a "BIOLOGICAL WEAPON" by "terrorist
nations". (See http://crooksandliars.com/node/23360/print)
Leavitt recently declared that a pandemic is "nature's terrorist". (See
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090509/ap_on_he_me/med_swine_flu_pivotal_moments) andhttp://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=35&sid=1670164. Here we have ex-HHS secretary
Leavitt, declaring that a pandemic is a useful form of "terrorism".
Since untested, untried, and potentially lethal "experimental vaccines" are restricted as "biologicalweapons" from distribution to "rogue nations", why even contemplate forcing the same "vaccine"
onto American citizens?
The only purpose for forcing American citizens to take these vaccines can be to cause death andinjury under the guise of employing them for peaceful purposes because these vaccines areaccording to the United States government’s own regulations so dangerous they have to be kept
out of the hands of “terrorist nations” for fear they might use them in a terrorist attack.
Any group of American, dual- American citizens or citizens of other countries who knowingly
develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent,
toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon against the people of Anerica, or knowingly assists a
foreign state or any organization to do so, also employing deceit and fraudulent misrepresentation
violates BWATA (see Attachment 1).
“Section 175: Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons(a) IN GENERAL- Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires,
retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or
knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or
imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over
an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”
The Act broadly defines several terms related to biological warfare of vector, toxin, biologicalagent and delivery system.
The “swine flu” virus fits the BWATA definition for classification as a bioweapon as:
any micro-organism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product that may be engineered as aresult of biotechnology, or any naturally occurring or bioengineered component of any suchmicroorganism, virus, infectious substance, or biological product, capable of causing death,disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another livingorganism; deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind or deleterious
alteration of the environment
The “swine flu” has killed and injured people in the United States alone and so meets the BWATA
of a toxin:•“Toxin: "whatever its origin or method of production -- any poisonous substance produced
by a living organism; or any poisonous isomer, homolog, or derivative of such a
substance".

20
The forced injections of the population with toxins under guise of offering prophylactic treatment
are the delivery system as defined by BWATA. The vaccination process itself will release a fully
weaponized virus:•“Delivery system: "any apparatus, equipment, device, or means of delivery specificallydesigned to deliver or disseminate a biological agent, toxin, or vector".

Constituting the vector as defined by BWATA are the people of the United States who will be
injected by force en masse with disease producing microorganisms, and so allow the virus tomutate and develop into more lethal strains.
•“Vector: "a living organism capable of carrying a biological agent or toxin to a host".”According to other sources, a top scientist for the United Nations, who has examined the outbreakof the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as HIV/AIDS victims, has concluded that the current
swine flu virus possesses certain transmission "vectors" that suggest the new strain has been
genetically-manufactured as a military biological warfare weapon.
The UN expert believes that Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and the current A-H1N1 swine flu virus arebiological warfare agents.

IV. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” virus is an artificial (genetic) virus.

Evidence comes from the Paris-based World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), which said on
April 27th the virus currently circulating in Mexico and the United States and which has killed atleast 20 people has never been found in any animal.
"The virus has not been isolated in animals to date. Therefore, it is not justified to name thisdisease swine flu," the OIE said in a press statement.
The virus "includes in its characteristics swine, avian and human virus components," the OIE said,
and urged that it be called "North American influenza," after its geographic origin.
The OIE said it was "urgent" that scientific research be carried out to determine the susceptibilityof animals to what it said was a "new virus."
Also, Adrian Gibbs, the Australian virologist, who was one of the first to analyze the genetic
construction of the swine flu virus, and who was part of the team which developed anti-flu
vaccines Tamiflu and Relenza, believes the disease - which has spread across the world in recent
weeks – was made in laboratories.
Gibbs and two colleagues analyzed the publicly available sequences of hundreds of amino acids
coded by each of the flu virus’s eight genes. He said he aims to submit his three-page paper today
for publication in a medical journal.
The World Health Organization is investigating a claim by an Australian researcher that the swine
flu virus circling the globe may have been created as a result of human error., according to areport on May 13 (Bloomberg) --21

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601124&sid=aShZig0Cig4g.
Andrew Rambaut, a viral geneticist at the University of Edinburgh, has said: “The newneuraminidase gene that came in from Eurasian swine is one we’ve never before seen circulatingin humans.”“This is what we call a reassortment between two currently circulating pig flu viruses,” he said.
“Why it’s emerged in humans is anyone’s guess. It hasn’t been seen before in pigs as far as I
know.”
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-04/29/swine-flu-genes-from-pigs-alone.aspx

V. Scientific evidence the “swine flu” was bioengineered to resemble the Spanish flu virus of
1918.

Research scientist working on the recreation of the 1918 flu allege that the Spanish flu genetic
material has been re-engineered to synthetically create what is now known as the A/H1N1 virus,
or as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) calls it, the “novel flu.”
The Spanish flu genetic material was obtained from the corpses of victims of the 1918 Spanish flu
buried in the Artic permafrost.
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_4724.shtml
The history of the synthetic H1N1 flu virus and a not-so-rosy future
By Wayne Madsen
Online Journal Contributing Writer
May 21, 2009, 00:20
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/(WMR) -- The history of the extraction of the genetic material from the corpses of victims of the1918 Spanish influenza virus who were buried in Arctic permafrost is part “X-Files” and part
“Jurassic Park.”
After an unsuccessful 1951 mission, that involved U.S. biological warfare specialists, to extract1918 Spanish flu genetic material in 1951 from a cemetery in the Inupiat Eskimo village of Brevig
Mission, Alaska, scientists made another attempt, a successful one it turns out, in 1997.
Dr True Ott has reported that the published definition of the swine flu by the NCSL is identical toJeffrey Taubenbergers 1997 initial findings concerning the 1918 killer virus which he successfully
resurrected 6 years later.
It easiest to explain this highly improbable match between the two viruses by assuming the „swine
flu“ virus was deliberately, and systematically engineered to resemble the 1918 Spanish killer flu
virus.
Dr Ott explains that Taubenberger’s initial 1997 report identified the 1918 killer virus as a “novel”(new) swine flu that “recombined” avian (H5N1) as well

22
as human (H3N2) virus fragments in its RNA structure.
Taubenberger, so Dr Ott argues as he reconstructs the events, then used a complex computer
program to perfectly match the RNA and DNA structures, in order to replicate and “resurrect” the1918 killer Spanish flu virus as a powerful biological weapon.
“SWINE FLU 2009” IS WEAPONIZED 1918 “SPANISH FLU”
By A. True Ott, PhD, ND“The "Spanish" influenza pandemic killed at least 20 million people in 1918-1919, making it theworst infectious pandemic in history.
*Understanding the origins of the 1918 virus and the basis for its exceptional virulence may aid in
the prediction of future influenza pandemics.* RNA from a victim of the 1918 pandemic wasisolated from a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, lung tissue sample. Nine fragments of viral
RNA were sequenced from the coding regions of hemagglutinin, neuraminidase, nucleoprotein,matrix protein 1, and matrix protein*/2. The sequences are consistent with a novel H1N1 influenza A virus that belongs to thesubgroup of strains that infect humans and swine, not the avian subgroup.” /**/ /*SOURCE: Science Magazine Report, 21 March 1997, Dr. Jeffrey
Taubenberger et. al. See
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/275/5307/179
Taubenberger’s initial report identified the 1918 killer virus as a “novel” (new) swine flu that“recombined” avian (H5N1) as well as human (H3N2) virus fragments in its RNA structure.
Taubenberger used a complex computer program to perfectly match the
RNA and DNA structures, and then successfully replicated and“resurrected” the 1918 killer flu as a powerful biological weapon in 2003, 6 years later. Now,
indeed as Taubenberger foresaw in 1997, evil and conspiring men in positions of high power can
not only PREDICT FUTURE INFLUENZA PANDEMICS, but they can also UNLEASH THEM
AT WILL from laboratory test tubes in order to achieve socio-economic
agendas.
It should concern EVERY MAN, WOMAN, AND CHILD in America (as well as the entire
world) that according to the World Health Organization(WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia, the so-called “Swine Flu”
infecting and killing human beings in Mexico and North America this spring and summer, is *“anew subtype of the A/H1N1 not previously detected in swine or humans. This novel H1N1
influenza (swine flu) virus is a triple recombinant including
gene segments of human, swine, and avian origin*.” Source:
http://www.ncsl.org/?tabid=17089(Interestingly, the National Council of State Legislatures (NCSL) is an unelected bureaucracy ofpolicy-makers instigated and promulgatedby Utah’s Dixie Leavitt, the father of Mike O. Leavitt the PANDEMIC FLU GURU of the Bushadministration.)
This published definition by the NCSL is IDENTICAL to Taubenberger’s 1997 initial findings
concerning the 1918 killer virus which he successfully resurrected 6 years later. Is this just a
bizarre, meaningless coincidence? You decide.
The 1918 virus pandemic was the direct result of TYPHUS FEVER VACCINES injected into

23
millions of soldiers during the Great War (WWI). John D. Rockefeller labs and factories in China produced these Typhus vaccines in 1916 byharvesting pus from infected humans, injecting the infectious matter into pig hosts, then mixing
the harvested contaminants into chicken egg albumin to be injected into human hosts as a“vaccine”.
Rockefeller, always a shrewd businessman, supplied both sides,(German as well as Allied armies) with his toxic and lethal vaccine brew. Immediately after
vaccination, many soldiers fell ill with what was called at the time “Para-Typhoid” infection --i.e. nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and killing pneumonia. Subsequent waves spread across the globe,
killing as many as 50 million innocent souls worldwide. (Source: The Horrors of Vaccination –Higgins, 1921)
Only much later did the world’s medical establishment wrongfully label and name the deadly
recombinant virus accidentally spawned by Rockefeller’s vaccine the “1918 Spanish Flu”. Of
course, Rockefeller’s multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical empire could notafford to label it what it really was: “Vaccine-Induced Disease of 1918”.
Today, the stage is set for eugenics and genocide on a truly massive scale. The Taubenberger
Frankenstein monster has been released and hundreds of millions of 1918 influenza vaccine
serums have been produced.
It was an accident in 1918, however the subsequent cover-up is/was unconscionable. What is
occurring now is inexcusable and criminal in the extreme.
Mother Nature does not “naturally” recombine bird, swine and three human influenza viruses.
(Birds do not exchange bodily fluids with pigs and humans in un-natural sexual liaisons --- only
sick, warped scientists can create such a monstrosity.)
Mexico's top government epidemiologist said Wednesday that it is "highly improbable" that a
farm in the Mexican state of Veracruz operated by Smithfield Foods Inc. is responsible for thenation's swine-flu outbreak.
Miguel Ángel Lezana, the government's chief epidemiologist, said in an interview that pigs at thefarm are from North America, while the genetic material in the virus is from Europe and Asia.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124105320874371313.html
Dr Leonard Horowitz states in a 10.41 mins YouTube clip that the swine-bird-human flu strain in
Mexico could have only come from Dr James S Robertson and colleagues because: "nobody elsetakes H5N1 Asian-flu infected chickens, brings them to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines
their proteins with H1N1 viruses from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in someswine flu genes from pigs, then reverse engineers them to infect humans."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBeKB7aKzOs
In addition, Dr Horowitz indicates that there is hard evidence to show that Dr James Robertson
believes it is OK to prime populations worldwide by releasing viruses he and his colleagues are
creating in advance of a pandemic.
Dr Horowitz mentions the involvement of Dr Rick Bright who has ties to the WHO, the CDC and
Novovax Inc, and is involved in PATH - Influenza Vaccine Project in the Vaccine Development
Global Program.

24

VI. Genome sequence of the “swine flu”

An analysis of the “swine flu” genome sequence by Alexander S Jones indicates that 5% of boththese influenza A RNA sequences share no known homology in any public databases (in addition
to the avian/swine hybrid nature of both these critical genes), and so a laboratory origin for thisvirus must be seriously considered.
“Influenza A virus (A/Texas/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear export protein (NEP) andnonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/FJ981620==============================================
HA ("hemaglutinin") protein BLAST sequence homology
Accession
Description
Max score
Total score
Query coverage
E value
Max ident
Links

FJ981615.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
3142 3142 100% 0.0 100%

FJ981612.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
3142 3142 100% 0.0 100%

FJ966982.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
3142 3142 100% 0.0 100%

FJ966959.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/05/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
3142 3142 100% 0.0 100%

25
CY039527.1
Influenza A virus (A/Netherlands/602/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 sequence3125 3125 99% 0.0 99%

FJ969511.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/10/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3125 3125 100% 0.0 99%

FJ966952.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/05/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3125 3125 100% 0.0 99%

FJ969509.1
Influenza A virus (A/New York/19/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3120 3120 100% 0.0 99%

FJ966960.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/06/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3120 3120 100% 0.0 99%

FJ981613.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3114 3114 100% 0.0 99%

FJ971076.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/08/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3114 3114 100% 0.0 99%

FJ966974.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3114 3114 100% 0.0 99%

FJ966082.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3109 3109 100% 0.0 99%

FJ969540.1

26
Influenza A virus (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
3107 3107 100% 0.0 99%

FJ973557.1
Influenza A virus (A/Auckland/1/2009(H1N1)) segment 4 hemagglutinin(HA) gene, partial cds
2894 2894 92% 0.0 99%

AF455680.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Indiana/P12439/00 (H1N2)) hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
2710 2710 100% 0.0 95%

AF250124.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Indiana/9K035/99 (H1N2)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2699 2699 100% 0.0 95%

AY038014.1
Influenza A virus (A/Turkey/MO/24093/99(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (H1)gene, complete cds2682 2682 100% 0.0 95%

EU139828.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Minnesota/1192/2001(H1N2)) hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
2676 2676 100% 0.0 95%

EF556201.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Guangxi/17/2005(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
2665 2665 100% 0.0 94%

AF455675.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Ohio/891/01(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA) gene,complete cds
2660 2660 100% 0.0 94%

FJ974021.1
Influenza A virus (A/Regensburg/Germany/01/2009(H1N1)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, partial cds
2656 2656 84% 0.0 99%

AY060047.1

27
Influenza A virus (A/SW/MN/23124-T/01(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA) gene,complete cds
2654 2654 100% 0.0 94%

AY060050.1
Influenza A virus (A/SW/MN/16419/01(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2643 2643 100% 0.0 94%

AY060048.1
Influenza A virus (A/SW/MN/23124-S/01(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA) gene,complete cds
2643 2643 100% 0.0 94%

AF455681.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Illinois/100085A/01 (H1N2)) hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds2638 2638 100% 0.0 94%

EF556199.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Guangxi/13/2006(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
2621 2621 100% 0.0 94%

AF455682.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Illinois/100084/01 (H1N2)) hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
2621 2621 100% 0.0 94%

EU139830.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Minnesota/00194/2003(H1N2)) hemagglutinin(HA) gene, complete cds
2604 2604 100% 0.0 94%

EU139831.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Kansas/00246/2004(H1N2)) hemagglutinin (HA)
gene, complete cds
2560 2560 100% 0.0 93%

EU604689.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/OH/511445/2007(H1N1)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2555 2555 100% 0.0 93%

AF455677.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/North Carolina/93523/01 (H1N2))

28
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2534 2534 100% 0.0 93%

DQ666933.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Korea/S11/2005(H1N2)) segment 4
hemagglutinin gene, complete cds
2518 2518 99% 0.0 93%

EU798780.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Korea/Hongsong2/2004(H1N2)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2488 2488 99% 0.0 93%

EU798781.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Korea/JL01/2005(H1N2)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2486 2486 99% 0.0 93%

EU798784.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Korea/Asan04/2006(H1N2)) segment 4
hemagglutinin (HA) gene, complete cds
2481 2481 99% 0.0 93%

NS1 ("non-structural") protein BLAST sequence homology
Sequences producing significant alignments:(Click headers to sort columns)
Accession
Description Max score
Total score Query coverage E
value Max ident
Links
FJ981620.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear export
protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1594 1594 100% 0.0 100%
FJ981611.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/05/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear export
protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1594 1594 100% 0.0 100%
FJ969538.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1589 1589 100% 0.0 99%
FJ969533.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/08/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1589 1589 100% 0.0 99%
FJ969528.1

29Influenza A virus (A/California/07/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1589 1589 100% 0.0 99%
FJ969519.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/08/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1589 1589 100% 0.0 99%
FJ969514.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1589 1589 100% 0.0 99%
FJ971074.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/06/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1583 1583 100% 0.0 99%
FJ966966.1
Influenza A virus (A/Texas/05/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear export
protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1559 1559 97% 0.0 100%
FJ966086.1
Influenza A virus (A/California/04/2009(H1N1)) segment 8 nuclear
export protein (NEP) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete
cds1543 1543 97% 0.0 99%
EU735822.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/OH/313053/2004(H3N2)) nonstructuralprotein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1395 1395 100% 0.0 95%
EF551057.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/North Carolina/2003(H3N2)) nonstructuralprotein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1389 1389 100% 0.0 95%
EF551049.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/Illinois/2004(H3N2)) nonstructural protein
2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds
1389 1389 100% 0.0 95%
DQ150437.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/IN/PU542/04 (H3N1)) nonstructural protein(NS1) gene, complete cds
1389 1389 100% 0.0 95%
AF153262.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Minnesota/9088-2/98 (H3N2)) segment 8 NS1and NS2 genes, complete cds
1386 1386 97% 0.0 96%
AF153261.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Texas/4199-2/98 (H3N2)) segment 8 NS1 andNS2 genes, complete cds
1386 1386 97% 0.0 96%
AF342817.1
Influenza A virus (A/Wisconsin/10/98 (H1N1)) nonstructural protein 1

30
and nonstructural protein 2 genes, complete cds
1384 1384 100% 0.0 95%
DQ335775.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/Ohio/313053/04(H3N2)) nonstructuralprotein (NS) gene, complete cds
1384 1384 100% 0.0 95%
AF153263.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Iowa/8548-1/98) segment 8 NS1 and NS2
genes, complete cds
1380 1380 97% 0.0 96%
EU697208.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/Minnesota/366767/2005(H3N2)) nonstructuralprotein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds1378 1378 100% 0.0 95%
EU735830.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/NC/353568/2005(H3N2)) nonstructuralprotein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes, complete cds1378 1378 100% 0.0 95%
DQ150429.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/MI/PU243/04 (H3N1)) nonstructural protein(NS1) gene, complete cds1378 1378 100% 0.0 95%
EU697213.1
Influenza A virus (A/turkey/North Carolina/353568/2005(H3N2))
nonstructural protein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes,
complete cds1373 1373 100% 0.0 95%
AF250128.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Indiana/9K035/99 (H1N2)) NS1 and NS2 genes,
complete cds
1369 1369 97% 0.0 96%
AY038021.1
Influenza A virus (A/Turkey/MO/24093/99(H1N2)) nonstructural protein(NS) gene, complete cds, alternatively spliced1363 1363 98% 0.0 95%
EU798872.1
Influenza A virus (A/swine/Korea/CAS09/2006(H3N2)) segment 8
nonstructural protein 2 (NS2) and nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) genes,
complete cds
1360 1360 97% 0.0 95%
AY060136.1
Influenza A virus (A/SW/IN/14810-S/01(H1N2)) nonstructural protein(NS) gene, complete cds
1360 1360 97% 0.0 95%
AY060135.1
Influenza A virus (A/SW/IN/14810-T/01(H1N2)) nonstructural protein(NS) gene, complete cds
1360 1360 97% 0.0 95%
AY060129.1
Influenza A virus (A/SW/MN/3327/00(H1N2)) nonstructural protein (NS)gene, complete cds
1360 1360 97% 0.0 95%
AF455710.1
Influenza A virus (A/Swine/Minnesota/5“31

Alexander S Jones concluded “we must seriously consider a laboratory origin for this virus”
because 5% of both these influenza A RNA sequences share no known homology in any public
databases.
“BLAST sequence homology of 'swine flu' indicates both the Hemagglutinin(HA) surface protein as well as the Non-structural (NS1) interferon
Inhibition proteins are novel recombinants previously unidentified in nature.
Both these influenza proteins, based on the genetic sequences released Friday May 1st by the U.S.
Centers of Disease Control (CDC), share their closest genetic identity with turkey (avian) and pig(swine) strains from multiple continents including North America as well as Asia. Even the closest
matches indicate 5% previously unidentified genetic material.
I submit this evidence, coupled with the lack of the presence of this virus at the pig farm near the
proposed CDC's "patient zero" (a 5 year old from La Gloria, 80km away from the pig farm in
Perote, Mexico), shows that the origin of the flu outbreak remains unidentified at this time, andcannot be ascribed to Mexican or North American swine.
Furthermore, I submit that since 5% of both these influenza A RNA sequences share no known
homology in any public databases (in addition to the avian/swine hybrid nature of both these
critical genes), that we must seriously consider a laboratory origin for this virus.
Future research that may be promising includes identifying critical SNPs, especially in the PB2
and the NS1 coding regions which may be markers for evolution of pathogen virulence, andshould be closely monitored. The hemagglutinin protein should also be monitored for acquisitionof a poly-basic amino acid site which would give the virus pantrophic properties as in the 1918
pandemic. “(Alexander S Jones)VII. Evidence as to the role of Baxter and WHO in producing and releasing pandemic virus
material in Austria.

Baxter Pharmaceutical http://www.baxter.com/ has been chosen by the WHO to lead the efforts infinding a vaccine cure for the swine flu H1N1 virus.
Baxter AG, headquartered in Vienna, and the Austrian subsidiary of the pharmaceutical company
Baxter International, headquartered in Deerfield, IL, USA, sent vaccine material contaminatedwith deadly live H5N1 bird flu virus to 16 laboratories in four countries in winter 2009 before atechnician caught the mistake.
The deadly mixture of live bird flu virus and human flu virus were mixed in a biosecurity level 3
facility, where basic protocol and procedures would make it impossible to ever mix a live virus
bioweapon with vaccine material by accident. In the first place, the strain of bird flu that is lethal
to humans has no place in the the Baxter facility in Austria. So what was it doing in the facility
designed for research into normal flu viruses and vaccines and their production to begin with?

32

The material released was a combination H3N2 seasonal flu viruses and live, unlabeled H5N1
viruses. If both strains were to incubate and recombine in a human host, a virulent airborne
weapon that would cause a pandemic would be released, potentially killing billions.
The Baxter facility did not radiate the material before they sent it out, leaving the deadly virus
alive.
To sum up,Baxter International, a global pharmaceutical corporation that has secured lucrative
contracts to supply bird flu vaccines in pandemic, mixed live bird flu with human flu vaccine
material in a Biosecurity level -3 facility, fail to radiate it and sent it under a false label to 16 labs
as vaccine material.
About eight weeks later, a artitificial, genetic worldwide interspecies flu pandemic breaks out in
Mexico City, close to another Baxter facility, and the same company is given government andWHO contracs to produce vaccines for the outbreak.

According to Austrian Health Minister Alois Stöger , 72 kilograms of vaccine material was
contaminated with the live bird flu virus which WHO supplied.
http://www.parlament.gv.at/PG/DE/XXIV/AB/AB_01457/fnameorig_158854.html Parliamentary
answers 1457/AB (XXIV. GP) May 20th, 2009,
Fragen 14 und 15:
Das für Forschungszwecke bestimmtes Material -72 kg waren als kontaminiert anzusehen - wurdein die Firma zurück geholt und kontrolliert vernichtet.“
It is still not clear how 72 kilograms of the world’s deadliest bioweapon can be sent by accident
from a high biosecurity facilities, not irradiated and under a false label.
However, we know from Baxter itself that it produced the 72 kilograms contaminated materialusing a wild type live bird flu virus obtained from the WHO reference center.
http://www.promedmail.org/pls/otn/f?p=2400:1001:53103::NO::F2400_P1001_BACK_PAGE,F2
400_P1001_PUB_MAIL_ID:10001,76322„A statement on behalf of Baxter------------------------------I would like to provide the following update to a posting on ProMED
dated 25 Feb 2009 (Avian influenza, accidental distribution - Czech
Rep. ex Austria: RFI).
The H5N1 strain was the A/Vietnam/1203/2004 strain, received from a
WHO reference centre. All information concerning this incident has
been provided to the involved national authorities and appropriate
international bodies such as ECDC and WHO.
-Christopher Bona
Director, Global BioScience Communications

33
Corporate Communications
Baxter International Inc.
One Baxter Parkway
Deerfield, IL 60015<christopher_bona@baxter.com>
Also, Baxter is the only flu vaccine manufacturer to work with wild type flu viruses, felt to be
more dangerous than the altered and attenuated (weakened) viruses other manufacturers use.
http://chealth.canoe.ca/channel_health_news_details.asp?news_id=27436&news_channel_id=1020&channel_id=1020
The Austrian police have launched an investigation into the incident that almost triggered a global
pandemic. The mixture of the deadly H5N1 virus with a mix of H3N2 seasonal flu viruses isclassified as one of the most deadly bioweapons in the world with a mortality rate of 63 per cent.
So, with the Baxter incident in Austria, there is proof that Baxter not only created flu material
with help from WHO, but also distributed them in large quantities to trigger a pandemic, while
also positioning themselves to produce the vaccine allegedly to "protect" against the virus theycreated and released.
In criminal charges filed against Baxter on April 8th, 2009 at the Vienna City Prosecutor’s office,Landesgerichtstr 11, 1080 Vienna, Austria, it was alleged that Baxter unlawfully, wilfully andknowingly, in the period between December 2008 and February 2009, employed manipulative anddeceptive devices and contrivances in violation of national and international laws on the
manufacturing, possession, release and dissemination of biological weapons of mass destruction
and on organised crime, to manufacture and distribute a biological agent that is classified as abioweapon among the population in order to profit from the pandemic.
First, Baxter manufactured influenza material contaminated with a bird flu virus in its biomedical
research laboratories in Orth on the Danube in December 2008.
Baxter uses BSL 3 (Biosafety Level 3) precautions in its laboratories, a system for the safehandling of toxic substances, which makes an accidental contamination of ordinary flu material
with the dangerous bird flu virus virtually impossible.
The 72 kilograms of contaminated vaccine material contained a mixture of a seasonal H3N2
human influenza virus and the deadly bird flu H5N1 virus. By adding a virus of the type H5N1 toan ordinary flu virus of the type H3N2, The H5N1 virus is restricted in its human-to-humantransmissibility, especially because it is less airborne. However, when it is combined with seasonal
flu viruses, which are airborne and easily spread, a new bioweapon is created.
Second, Baxter distributed via Avir this contaminated vaccines using false concealment and afalse label to 16 laboratories in Austria and in other countries at the end of January/beginning of
February, potentially infecting at least 36-37 laboratory staff, who had had to be treatedpreventively for bird flu and ordinary flu in hospital.
A total of 18 laboratory staff belonging to Avir had to undergo preventative treatment for the bird
flu and ordinary flu at the Otto Wagner Hospital in Vienna on February, 9th, 2009, because of their
exposure as part of their work to the highly pathogenic bird flu virus.

34This indicates that, in the opinion of medical experts, there was a risk that the staff of Avir had
contracted bird flu, and, unknowingly, acted as carriers of a pandemic virus into the population ofa densely built up Vienna city district and in wintertime.
The material was only discovered when staff working for BioTest (in Konarovice in the Czech
Republic), tested the vaccination on ferrets, who then died.
BiotTst was supposed to test anti-flu vaccination that should serve Europeans during the next flu
season, and the labels on the material sent to them from Baxter via Avir gave no indication of thelethal contents.
The 13 BioTest staff were treated with Tamiflu and were placed in quarantine for fear they had
been contaminated with the bird flu virus, which is on the list of the possible biological weaponsand one of the most dangerous biological agents on the Earth with more than 60% death rate.
Subsequently the same problem of Baxter contaminated vaccine material was found in thelaboratories in Slovenia, Austria and Germany, who had received the material from Baxter.
First, the company Baxter evoked the 'trade secret" and refused to explain how exactly how a
Level 3 biological warfare pathogen found its way into H3N2 material, regardless whether or not
this experimental vaccine material was 'intended' for eventual use in humans or not.
Baxter representatives have said that the material sent to the Czech republic, Austria, Slovenia andGermany was in fact a pure H5N1 sent by accident - maybe to mask the previous assumption,that it was in fact an ordinary flu vaccine, which was contaminated. It is still not clear whether it
was in fact the pure H5N1 or contaminated vaccine.
The Austrian Health Minister Alois Stöger confirmed on May 20th 2009 that the 72 kilograms ofcontaminated vaccine material has been destroyed, but no information has been released as to thegenetic sequences of the contaminated material or what Clade was Baxter's H5N1 vaccine from,whether from Clade 1? Clade 2? Clade 3? Other?
Therefore, it is not possible to know whether H5N1 resembles the strains circulating in waterfowl.
Was the contaminated H5N1 strain genetically engineered? If so, by whom? Does the NS protein
in Baxter's H5N1 material contain polymorphisms which suppress human interferon production?
Was Baxter's H5N1 a full set of influenza genes? Or was it just the hemaglutanin andneuraminidase? Did Baxter's H5N1 contain a poly-basic cleavage site on the Hemaglutanin
surface protein? Why were the samples of experimental vaccine material not irradiated?
Coinfection of H5N1 and H3N2 would not produce simple reassortment but a complex in vivo
recombination of many competing strains in the infected host.
Furthermore the complex coinfection of H5N1 and H3N2 in a human would produce natural
selection pressure for maximum virulence.
The book "Evolutionary Dynamics" suggest that viral coinfection selects for both maximum
virulence and infectivity.
How close the world came to a pandemic is underlined by the reaction of Panasonic Japan.
On February 9th – on the very same day as 18 employees of Avir were given preventative
treatment for the bird flu in the Otto Wagner Hospital in Vienna – AFP reported that Panasonic35Japan intended to bring back to Japan the families of many of its staff working around the world
because of the threat of a bird flu pandemic.
“Panasonic to fly home workers’ families over bird flu fears
Feb 9, 2009TOKYO (AFP) — Panasonic Corp. has ordered Japanese employees in some foreign countries tosend their families home to Japan in preparation for a possible bird flu pandemic, a spokesman
said Tuesday.”
The firm decided to take the rare measure “well ahead of possible confusion at the outbreak of a
global pandemic,” he said.
The Times of India reported on March 6th, 2009, that a pandemic was nearly triggered as a resultof Baxter’s actions. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Health--Science/Science/Virus-mix-up-bylab-could-have-resulted-in-pandemic/articleshow/4230882.cms“It's emerged that virulent H5N1 bird flu was sent out by accident from an Austrian lab last yearand given to ferrets in the Czech Republic before
anyone realised. As well as the risk of it escaping into the wild, the H5N1 got mixed with a humanstrain, which might have spawned a hybrid that could unleash a pandemic.
Last December, the Austrian branch of US vaccine company Baxter sent a batch of ordinary
human H3N2 flu, altered so it couldn't replicate, to Avir Green Hills Biotechnology, also inAustria. In February, a lab in the Czech Republic working for Avir alerted Baxter that, ferrets
inoculated with the sample had died. It turned out the sample contained live H5N1, which Baxter
uses to make vaccine. The two seem to have been mixed in error.
Markus Reinhard of Baxter says no one was infected because the H3N2 was handled at a highlevel of containment. But Ab Osterhaus of Erasmus University in the Netherlands says: "We needto go to great lengths to make sure this kind of thing doesn't happen."
Accidental release of a mixture of live H5N1 and H3N2 viruses could have resulted in direconsequences.“
It needs to be stressed that the bird flu virus was developed in US military laboratories from 1995
onwards by researchers who reconstructed the genetic code of the Spanish Flu pandemic virus of
1918-1919.
So, using the argument that they need to find an antidote to the lethal bird flu virus, researchers
have actually resurrected this lethal bird flu virus and created the danger in the first place, andwith funds provided by organisations such as WHO.
“Reviving the Spanish Flu virus is a recipe for a catastrophe. It could put any attack using anthrax
or the plague in the shade, “ said Jan van Aken, head of the German section of the Sunshine
Project.
In the summer of 2008, US researchers found that this newly reconstructed lethal bird flu virus
could be mixed with ordinary human flu virus in laboratory conditions and so, in theory, could
acquire easy human-to-human transmissibility.
It was precisely this very virus, a mix of a lethal H5N1 bird flu virus and an ordinary human flu
H3N2 virus that Baxter manufactured in its laboratory in Orth/Donau in December 2008, and then36
distributed via Avir to 16 laboratories in Austria and abroad employing fraudulent
misrepresentation.
The Canadian Press explains the issue:“While H5N1 doesn’t easily infect people, H3N2 viruses do. If someone exposed to a mixture of
the two had been simultaneously infected with both strains, he or she could have served as an
incubator for a hybrid virus able to transmit easily to and among people.“
According to media reports, Dr Rebecca Carley maintained in March 2009 that this was adeliberate attempt to start a pandemic.
“Basically, they’re trying to cause the pandemic. They have already stockpiled at least 250
million doses of the bird flu vaccine. The shelf life of that vaccine has a certain amount of timeby which they’ll have to throw it in the garbage. So they have to start the pandemic so that they
can give the vaccines, which will then cause the bird flu pandemic…In fact, this is an associatedpress article that says that our government is reluctant to give bird flu vaccine to some of therogue nations for fear they will use the vaccine as biological warfare. So when you actually lookat what’s out there, folks, it becomes crystal clear. This is genocide. This is population
reduction. And it’s happening right now. ““Well, let me also state that this is very intentional because the H5N1 bird flu virus is not actuallyable to be picked up by humans in a regular scenario. So by putting it with a regular human flu,they’re intentionally causing it to create a hybrid virus. And this is how they’re going to make thebird flu virus be contracted by the people because it’s very virulent. And basically, the scenariothat it creates is very disturbing. You actually bleed out into your lungs and suffocate on yourown blood. “

VIII. Evidence Baxter is an element in a covert bioweapons network.

There are grounds for believing the specific production system which Baxter has developed withhelp of US government bodies for producing a human vaccination to the bird flu — namely, theuse of 1,200 liter bioreactors and vero cell technology – could meet the technical criteria to beclassified as a secret dual purpose large-scale bioweapon production facility in as far as the
production process would allow a huge amount of contaminated vaccine material to be produced
rapidly.
Grounds for believing Baxter is involved in any "Special Access Programs" , as defined by
Congress, including 'waived', 'unacknowledged' 'waived' Special Access Programs (also known as'black programs'), include Baxter’s application for a patent for a bioengineered bird flu virus
designed to be more lethal Application number: 10/547155, Publication number: US
2007/0134270.
Vero cells, a continuous cell line derived from epithelial cells of the African green monkey kidneyused to make live polio vaccines and also to promote the spread of AIDS, can be used to growhuge amounts of virus in weeks, so allowing organisations such as WHO and Baxter to grow 72
kilos o bird flu virus rapidly and easily for distribution.
Green monkeys are used in medical research.

37
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1...
concerns viruses in African green monkeys.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=190510&rendertype=abst... states thatkidney cells of green monkeys can be used as hosts to cultivate influenza viruses.
http://www.ippl.org/Jasmine.htm states that monkeys can carry diseases that can make humans
sick or, at worse, can kill them. Monkeys can catch most human diseases.
http://www.sfbr.org/pages/news_release_detail.php?id=47 concerns work by Jonathan Allan todetermine the link between African green monkeys and AIDS. Over 50% of the monkeys carry
SIV – the simian version of HIV – yet never develop the disease.
If contaminated material were added to the 1,200 liter bioreactors, it would replicate and infect theentire batch of vaccine material in the 1,200 liter tank turning a vaccine into a bioweapon.
Contaminated material could be distributed among sections of the population using false labels
and secretly marked batches and so infect millions of people in a way as to delay the reaction orover two doses.
Such vaccine material would kill thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people under thecover of a prophylactic measure against a pandemic created by, and spread, by Baxter.
Imagine the potential for disaster if even one batch was infected and distributed to thousands, if
not hundreds of thousands of people, who would not only become ill themselves but also act as
incubators of a new more lethal virus.
At the same time, the media – controlled by the organised crime syndicate – would so explain thestory as to suggest that the deaths came from a naturally occurring virulent virus and the deaths
happened in spite of the injections.
Vaccinations are needed to upgrade the “swine flu” bridge virus to the more lethal “bird flu” virus
if the international crime syndicate is to achieve its goal of a drastic reduction in the world
population with a parallel consolidation of geopolitical power.
There is evidence the bioweapons programs are 'international' in scope with funding coming fromthe US government, WHO, the UN and also banks.
There are reasonable grounds for believing there are financial and social connections with theincoming administration as Baxter because its executives are based near Chicago, the politicalbase of President Obama, and Baxter has contributed to political parties.
It is clear that Baxter stands to benefit financially from the outbreak of a pandemic through acontaminated season influenza vaccine in late 2009, and that the shareholders will profit directlyfrom this boost.
It has been reported that President Obama holds shares in Baxter.
Certainly, Baxter is guaranteed substantial direct profits from their triggering a bird flu pandemic
from their contract sealed in 2006 with the Austrian Health Ministry, led by then Health Minister
Maria Rauch-Kallat, to supply 16 million vaccine shots in the event of a bird flu pandemic being
declared in Austria alone.

38
Baxter also has the contract to supply the swine flu vaccine for the Austrian government in spiteof its role in releasing pandemic material this winter.
Baxter has contracts with WHO to supply huge quantities of vaccines.
However, upfront profits from sales of vaccines are just one part of the profit that the organised
corporate crime syndicate, comprised also of banks, will obtain as mentioned.
If millions, if not billions, of people were to die as a result of a pandemic virus and/or
contaminated inoculations, then their assets, their savings, their houses, apartments, farms andcompanies would be easy to acquire by a crime syndicate that has infiltrated and annexed key
government offices.

Baxter Officers„Baxter officers in Austria:
Two Baxter officers associated with Baxter's Austria location where the 72 kilos of pandemic bird
flu was released, are Noel Barrett and Hartmut Ehrlich. Barret and Erlich were part of the Baxter
H5N1 Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Clinical Study Team that published A Clinical Trial of a
Whole-Virus H5N1 Vaccine Derived Cell Culture. The vaccine was called Celvapan.

Dr. Noel Barrett
Vice President, Global R&D Vaccines
Baxter AG

Dr. Barrett is Vice-Presdent R&D, Vaccines in the Bioscience Division of Baxter Healthcare. He
received his Ph.D. in Virology at Trinity College, Dublin in 1979 and subsequently held a postdoctoral fellowship for four years at the University of Würzburg in Germany. He is presently
responsible for overseeing the development of a range of viral and bacterial vaccines.
Here is an audio interview with Noel Barrett about "The vaccine-making industry's efforts tocombat the bird flu around the world." Of course, Barrett, Baxter and the rest of the vaccine
industry would love nothing more than for a bird flu outbreak to occur. Alan Watt points out thatthe current flu scare is just another example of how we truly live in an age of crisis creation. It's
not just to control the public via problem-reaction-solution. Crisis creation is also a great way tomake huge profits. Fear has always been a fantastic sales mechanism for the elite. The current flu
hype and panic means fantastic business for Baxter, and they're already cashing in on millions andmillions of taxpayer dollars.
Barrett is a member of the World Vaccine Council and spoke at the council's 2006 conference in
Lyon, France, which took place from October 9-11, 2006. What is it about the dates 9 and 11 andthis globalist cabal? It's like an Illumiati gang sign they can't stop flashing down through history. I
guess its also just a coincidence that the 'swine' flu outbreak of 2009 occurred 91 years after the1918 pandemic?
Part of the program for the conference at Lyon included the topic of "Avian flu and influenza: thereal situation" and Dr. Barrett gave a presentation on the topic of "The development of a vero cell
derived candidate H5N1 vaccine." Vero-cell technology allows Baxter to produce vaccines much

39
faster than the traditional egg based process which uses putrid chicken eggs to grow the viralculture. With vero-cell technology, viruses are placed in in large fermenting tanks with chemicals,
heavy metals ("accelerants"), and pulverized monkey kidneys. By not relying on the old system ofusing millions of eggs to make flu vaccines, Baxter claims it can cut vaccine production time inhalf, to as little as 12 weeks. It's also interesting to note that the WHO countered Dr. Gibbs' claimthat the flu probably came from a laboratory by disputing that there is enough evidence of the
traditional egg based laboratory process. News flash for the WHO: Baxter's Vero-cell technology
doesn't require any eggs.

Dr Hartmut Ehrlich
Vice President for Global Clinical Research and Development
Baxter scientist since 1995

Hartmuch Ehrlich is a hemophilia specialist who began at Baxter in 1995. In 1996, Bayer AG and
Baxter were discovered to have knowingly shipped out millions of ampules of HIV contaminatedFactor VIII--a hemophiliac drug--which resulted in the infections and deaths of many thousandsof people.
Ehrlich completed his Doctorate at the Clinical Research Unit for Blood Coagulation andThrombosis of the Max Planck Foundation, and conducted research at the Kerckhoff-Clinic of the
Max Planck Foundation. It's worth noting that what is known today as the Max Planck Foundation
actually began as the The Kaiser Wilhem Institute. Founded in 1911, The Kaiser Wilhelm
Institute was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and was the headquarters for Nazi research
into eugenics, euthanasia, population control, genetic engineering, and biological warfare.
Max Planck (1898-1947)

Known primarily as the German physicist who originated quantum theory, Max Planck was madepresident of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in 1930. At the end of WW II, the Institute was moved
and renamed the Max Planck Institute in order to cover up its unsavory past. Einstein neverforgave Planck for not being more critical of the Nazis.
After finishing his studies at the Max Planck Institute, Ehrlich joined Baxter in 1995 as Medical
Director for its Biotech business, and held several positions of increasing responsibility until
September 2003 when he was named Vice President, Global Clinical R&D for the BioScience
Division. In September of 2006, he was promoted to his current position, leading all R&D efforts
for BioScience. Ehrlich, along with Barrett, helped develop Baxter's bird flu vaccine Celvapan,
and helped secure an agreement with the WHO and EMEA to use the viral concoction if apandemic is declared.
“We are very pleased to receive the EMEA’s positive opinion for Celvapan,” said Hartmut
Ehrlich, M.D., vice president, BioScience global research and development. “This is another step
towards our goal of supplying a safe and effective vaccine to protect the population against a
possible influenza pandemic.” This scumbag should definitely be pleased now that theavian/swine flu has been released in Mexico and other locations around the world. If I understandcorrectly, pharmaceutical corporations are "immune" from liability if their products cause injury
or death as long as the distribution is by government mandate during a declared health emergency.
Baxter International Board of Directors>From its inception, Baxter International has had numerous military, medical-industrial complex,
and global eugenicist ties. The company was the first and only manufacturer of commercially40
prepared intravenous solutions for the US Army during WWII. Here is a sample of current Baxter
directors to give you some idea of the deep connections.

General Walter E. Boomer
Baxter Director since 1997
USMC Four Star General
Over 30 years in the military"A leader's position is with and in front of the people he is leading."
Walter Boomer - Above & Beyond: Former Marines Conquer the Civilian World (2004)
This is a curious statement from Boomer, who supposedly led all Marines in Operations Desert
Shield and Desert Storm. Where was the brave general when his own US Marine troops were
under biological attack from their own military command in Iraq? At least one in four U.S.
veterans of the 1991 Gulf War suffers from a multi-symptom illness caused by exposure to toxic
chemicals during the conflict. How many Marines died from vaccine induced Gulf War illness on
Boomer's watch? How many of his men and women still suffer from debilitating symptoms today
and can't get medical assistance from their own military? Since the Gulf War, 11 thousand
veterans have died from illnesses related to vaccines, DU, and chemical weapons.
I don't see Boomer exactly standing "with and in front of his people" when it comes to biological
warfare and cold blooded treason. Should we civilians also entrust our lives to this traitorous
bastard, much less believe anything that his cronies at Baxter or the criminals in government tell
us about the current flu outbreak or their proposed vaccines? Hell no.

Wayne T. Hockmeyer
Baxter Director since 2007
US Army Special Forces
Entomology degree
Malaria specialist
Chair, Immunology Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (1980-1986)
Founder, President & CEO of MedImmune, a flu vaccine technology company (1988-2000)

Here is an excerpt from Hockmeyer's biography:"After three months in his first job at Dow Chemical Co. in Michigan, he was commissioned in
the Army, and, following airborne and special forces training, was sent to Vietnam in 1968 withthe 5th Special Forces Group. The Army assisted with Hockmeyer's return to the University of
Florida, where he earned his doctorate. He rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel and, during his
20-year military career, authored many research papers with particular emphasis on thedevelopment of malaria vaccines."
Hockmeyer served as Chairman of the Immunology Department, Walter Reed Army Institute of
Research from 1980 to 1986. Walter Reed houses the largest biomedical research facility
administered by the US Defense Department. It was originally founded by US Army Surgeon,
General George Steinberg in 1893. Steinberg is known as the father of American bacteriology,
and Walter Reed can arguably be said to house some of the world's experts in biological warfare.

41
Wayne T. Hockmeyer Hall - Structural biology research facility at Purdue University that willcontain a BSL-3 laboratory

Hockmeyer Hall research facility at Purdue University is currently under construction and
expected to be completed by Fall of this year. Structural biology focuses on the physical design
and functions of viral structures (presumably in order to better manipulate them).
In this video of the dedication for what is essentially a bioweapons research facility, the speaker
admits that Hockmeyer Hall will contain a BSL-3 biohazards containment laboratory "specificallydesigned for the study and growth of pathogenic viruses."
Indeed, the recent research activities of the structural biology department of Purdue indicates aheavy interest in viruses as potential bioweapons:---They mapped the structure of the Dengue Virus and determined the structure of the immaturedengue particle while still within its cellular host, which will obviously help in the virus
development process.
---They analyzed the structure of the baseplate of the T-4 Virus helping scientists further
understand how viral infection occurs (in other words, how to better cause infection).
---They determined the orientation of the major surface proteins in the viral particle of West Nile
Virus. Because these proteins allow the virus to invade a host cell, the research could be a step
forward in combating (or spreading) the deadly mosquito-borne disease.
---They genetically modified the Ross River Virus that was then used to alter the liver cells of
living mice without killing them. Viruses as agents to alter the very structure of human beings.
---They redesigned the shell of Ebola, "transforming the feared virus into a benevolent workhorsefor gene therapy." The new modification is a version of Ebola that can be inhaled. As Alex has
mentioned numerous times lately, an airborne, inhalable version of the Ebola virus is the holygrail of bioweapons research for "Dr Death," aka Eric Pianka, the lunatic UT professor who callsfor 90% of the world's population be eradicated like vermin. It's unfortunate for the rest of us that
Pianka lacks the courage to lead by example and just kill himself, already.
Roll up your sleeve, "Dr. Death," Baxter has an injection for you.

Albert Sabin (1906-1993)

In 2005, Hockmeyer received the 2005 Albert Sabin "Humanitarian Award" by the Sabin Vaccine
Institute. Oh, that's rich. Sometimes just you have to laugh at the dark humor and doublespeak of
the eugenicists. Albert Sabin was a US virologist and developer of the dangerous and deadly oral
polio vaccine. During WW II, he devised vaccines for the United States Army. After the war, hedeveloped a live attenuated vaccine against polio, which presumably included monkey kidney
tissue that was infected with the notorious cancer causing agent SV-40 (simian virus 40) that
resulted in the deaths of millions and an explosion in the number of previously rare cancers. In the
1950s, Sabin persuaded the USSR to use the deadly vaccine on an industrial scale.

Joseph B. Martin
Baxter director since 2002.

42
Dean, Harvard Medical School, 1997-2007
Founder, Systems Biology Department, Harvard University

By all accounts, Joseph B. Martin is a hardcore eugenicist just like Boomer, Hockmeyer, Pianka,
Sabin, and the rest of the whitecoats at Baxter. Over the course of his career, Martin appears tohave contributed nothing to the actual curing of diseases or easing of human suffering, but only
directed his efforts towards the study of disease etiology and ways to manipulate sickness andspread it on a massive scale. In this evil pursuit he is no different than the rest of his colleagues.
Here are some of Martin's contributions to humanity:"The Role of Pathogenesis of Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Role of Dynamic Mutations."
Neuroreport 1996; 8:i-vii.
"The Molecular Basis of the Neurodegenerative Disorders." N Engl J Med 1999, 340:25:19701980.
On the surface, Dr. Martin is a neurology professor who specializes in degenerative diseases like
Alzheimers, Parkinson's, MS, ALS, and Huntington's, many of which are spreading at incredible
rates and are now widely believed to be caused by environmental and medical factors and inparticular, by vaccines. It's as if Martin and the other Baxter executives could have neverconceived that diseases might have iatrogenic causes .
"Dr. Martin's research focuses on the "application of neurochemical and molecular genetics tobetter understand the causes of neurological and neurodegenerative disease." Remember: vaccines
are essentially dual use bioweapons. A better understanding of the causes of disease is just thesame as learning how to better cause and spread disease among the human population. The
difference is only a matter of intention. In 1980, Dr. Martin established the NIH sponsored"Disease Center Without Walls." A "disease center without walls?" I don't like the sound of that,
especially when eugenicists are involved.
In 1984, Martin played a key role in establishing the Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease ResearchCenter. Let's see, after 60 years, there's still no cure for Alzheimer's, it's spreading at alarming
rates, there's no end in sight, and it's believed to be caused by environmental factors. Is Dr. Martin
actually trying to cure Alzheimer's? If so, his "disease research center" isn't helping much.
In 2003, Martin founded the Systems Biology department at Harvard. No doubt it was at thebehest of his globalist masters.
You only have to read the first two sentences of the Wikipedia definition of Systems Biology torealize it is mere pseudo-science masquerading as genuine holistic scientific inquiry. "Because thescientific method has been used primarily toward reductionism, one of the goals of systems
biology is to discover new emergent properties that may arise from the systemic view." In otherwords, the scientific method need not apply here. Systems Biology is just another academic coverfor the eugenicist elite's agenda.
Not surprisingly, eugenicist Andrew Huxley is known as the forefather of Systems Biology.
Andew Fielding Huxley was the youngest son of Leonard Huxley and half brother to Julian andAldous Huxley, all of whom were inbred, parasitic, elite eugenicists. According to Alan Watt,
Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World (1931), the novel that eerily predicts the very sociobiological nightmare we are currently living through, died of cancer of the tongue. Did he say too
much? Who might have had the viral expertise to kill Aldous with such a targeted cancer at the
time?

43
Andrew Fielding Huxley (1917-?)

Gail D. Fosler
Baxter Director since 2001
Council on Foreign Relations
Bretton Woods Committee
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Advisory Panel
Trustee, The Economic Club of New York"It is industries, not nations, that compete globally."-- Gail D. Fosler, Chief Economist, The Conference Board
An unabashed globalist, Gail Fosler is President and Chief Economist for The Conference Board,a key policymaking NGO for globalists and bankers. Prior to joining The Conference Board in
1989, Fosler was Chief Economist and Deputy Staff Director of the US Senate Budget
Committee. The Wall Street Journal twice named Fosler America's most accurate economic
forecaster. So, although she has absolutely no biology or chemistry background, it would seemthat Fosler knows a bit about pseudo-science herself.
Headquartered in New York, The Conference Board is a global organization with offices inBrussels, Hong Kong, India, the Middle East, and Beijing. It began with a 1915 meeting at the
Yama Farms Inn in New York which consisted of the presidents of 12 major corporations and sixof the foremost industry associations. The gathering included Frank A. Vanderlip, a member of
the Jekyll Island group, the notorious group of bankers that wrote the bill that became the Federal
Reserve Act.
Frank A. Vanderlip (1864-1937)

Joining Fosler on the Conference Board are two fellow globalist scumbags:
Harry M. J. Kraemer Jr. (Vice Chair), former Baxter Chairman and CEO. Director of SAIC.

Josef Ackermann (Vice Chair), director of Bayer AG, Deutsche Bank AG, Royal Dutch Shell,
Siemens. Bilderberg attendee: 2005, 2008

Gail Fosler is also a member of The Council on Foreign Relations and the Bretton Woods
Committee, director and a member of the Executive Committee of the National Bureau of
Economic Research, and a trustee of The Economic Club of New York. She has served on theAdvisory Panel to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. She is a director of Caterpillar
Incorporated, Unisys Corporation, and H.B. Fuller, one of the world's largest polluters. There are
a number of Baxter officials that have also worked for H.B. Fuller.
Gail's husband, R. Scott Fosler, is also a globalist public policy hack.
Among his publications are:
The Challenge to New Governance in the Twenty-First Century: Achieving Effective CentralLocal Relations,Public Private Partnership in American Cities,
and The New Economic Role of American States: Strategies in a Competitive World Economy

44

Albert P. L. Stroucken (Netherlands)
Baxter Director since 2004
Bayer AG (1969-1998)
HB Fuller (1998-2006)

It was during Stroucken's tenure in 1997 that both Bayer and Baxter agreed to a $670 million
settlement after knowingly distributing blood products that infected thousands of hemophiliacs
with HIV during the 1980s.

Bayer has a long history of atrocities dating all the way back to WW II. According to a lawsuit,
Bayer paid Nazi officials during World War II for access to concentration camp victims andcollaborated in Nazi experiments with Joseph Mengele as a form of research and development for
their products. A physician identified only as Dr. Koenig was a representative of Bayer andaccompanied "Angel of Death" Mengele as he performed his grotesque medical experiments at
the Nazi concentration camp at Auschwitz. Bayer provided toxic chemicals to the Nazis, andMengele used them in the experiments, while Koenig recorded the results and reported theinformation back to Bayer.
The Angel of Death, Joseph Mengele

James R. Gavin III
Baxter Director since 2003
Lieutenant Commander, US Public Health Service (1971-73)
Senior Science Officer, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (1991-2002)
Trustee, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Another not-for-profit NGO helping to usher in the New World Order, the Howard Hughes
Medical Institute is really a front for eugenics research and activities. They even proudly issue a
publication called "The Genetic Trail."
The Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) is one of the largest private medical researchorganizations in the US, second in funding only to fellow eugenics operation, the Bill & Melinda
Gates Foundation. Unlike most such organizations, HHMI directly employs the researchers it
funds, and the 350+ "investigators," as the institute likes to call them, include a dozen Nobel Prizewinners. They concentrate primarily on such areas as cell biology, genetics, immunology, andneuroscience, as well as the formerly discussed eugenics pseudoscience, structural biology. To top
it all off, James Baker III is on the board of HHMI. What more needs to be said?
Gavin is also involved with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation – another NGO eugenics front.
9/11 coverup artist Thomas Kean is is Chairman of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation .

Appendix: Baxter International Officers

45
In addition to its board of directors, Baxter officers also indicate deep military, med-industrial
complex, and global eugenicist ties. Here's a quick list.
Robert L. Parkinson, Jr.
Baxter Executive Admits Heparin Contamination Appears Deliberate

Wilbur H. Gantz
CEO, PathoGenesis
Military Service: USMC
Princeton
HarvardHarry M. Jansen Kraemer, Jr.
Director, SAIC (1997-)

Vernon R. Loucks, Jr.
Skull and Bones Society
Military service: USMC
Director, Harvard Business School
National Institutes of Health Special Adviser (1983-86)
Sabin Vaccine Institute Lifetime Achievement Award, 2006.

James R. Tobin
Military service: US Navy (Lt., 1968-72)“

IX. Evidence Baxter has deliberately contamined drugs.

That vaccine material has been deliberately contaminated causing death and injury has even been
admitted by Baxter’s CEO Robert Parkinson.
Baxter is at the center of a lawsuit alleging that Baxter altered an ingredient in heparin that flowed
through heparin syringes to patients, resulting in pain and suffering, and sometimes death, to thoseaffected.
“Baxter International chief executive Robert Parkinson admitted to what looks to be the deliberatecontamination of its heparin product which contributed to 81 deaths and prompted a productrecall. He said that a contaminating agent that is an altered form of chondroitin sulfate waspurposely added to the material before it reached Baxter's supplier in China.“ (Sturgeon, 2009)http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpposted/archive/2008/04/29/baxter-ceo-personalresponsibility-over-drug-contamination.aspx“We're alarmed that one of our products was used in what appears to have been a deliberate
scheme to adulterate a lifesaving medication,“ Baxter Chief Executive Officer Robert Parkinson
told the House Energy and Commerce Committee's investigative subcommittee.

46“It seems to us that it's an intentional act upstream in the supply chain“ said David Strunce, thechief executive officer of Waunakee, Wisconsin-based Scientific Protein, during the hearing. “We
don't know specifically where.“
The drug's main ingredient was contaminated before reaching the Chinese factory of Baxter's
supplier, Scientific Protein Laboratories, executives of both companies testified at a U.S. House
hearing today.
The Food and Drug Administration suspects the contamination was deliberate, though there isn't
proof, according to the agency.
Baxter recalled heparin, used to prevent blood clots, in January of this year after reports ofharmful side effects. Since January 2007, 81 people have died after allergic reactions, the FDA
said on April 21. Tainted heparin made by other drugmakers has been found in more than a dozen
countries since Baxter's recall, and regulators have said they don't know how it was introduced.
Some samples of Baxter's heparin were found contaminated with a cheaper substance known as
over-sulfated chondroitin sulfate, according to the company and the FDA.
In a class-action lawsuit filed filed January 5th 2009 by Joyce Ann Osteen at the St. Clair County
Circuit Court for compensation for scores of patients harmed by tainted heparin, the claim is madethat Baxter altered the profile of the drug, in an attempt to reduce costs.
The lawsuit accuses Baxter of using a more dangerous and unapproved ingredient, OSCS to
dilute, or to substitute for the more costly, natural ingredient in heparin to "reap greater profits as aresult of utilizing cheap component parts."
About 3500 pig intestines are required to produce 2.2 pounds of raw heparin. While the suit did
not quantify heparin mass relative to value, it was alleged that it costs Baxter $900 to produce
heparin the old-fashioned way.
It is alleged, Baxter found a way to make that same amount of heparin for just $9. And the heparin
mimic OSCS, according to the lawsuit, was the key.
The lawsuit notes that OSCS is not found in nature, and is not approved in the United States.
"Un-approved APIs significantly increases the likelihood that exposed patients will experience
adverse side effects and reactions that can result from the un-approved doses," the suit states. "Inother words, an unapproved API enhances the risk and danger."
As of April 8, there have been 103 reported deaths in patients who received tainted heparin since
January 1st of 2007, the suit states. Of those deaths, 91 were reported after January 1st of lastyear.
"On or about July 30th, 2008 the (US Food and Drug Administration) conclusively linked thedeaths of patients infused with heparin to specific lots made by Baxter," the suit states. "Thespecific lots of Baxter product tested positive for OSCS."
Heparin crude lots received in August 2006 are said to have included material from anunacceptable workshop vendor, according to the suit. Raw material inventory records wereincomplete, the control of material flow in the processing area was found to be inadequate, and acollection of outer foil bags containing heparin sodium were unlabeled. There was also no reportor data to verify that the leachable for certain bags used for heparin sodium had been evaluated,according to the complaint.

47

Inspectors reported a breakdown in critical processing steps identified for heparin sodium USP
process, a lack of an impurity profile established for heparin sodium, and a lack of evaluation for
degradents. Manufacturing instructions were found to be incomplete, and there had been noverification performed for the reported USP test methods.
When even the CEO of Baxter has said that the contamination of Baxter’s blood-thinner heparinappears to have been deliberate and he has a “strong sense of personal responsibility“ for this“deliberate scheme“, how much more likely is a deliberate contamination of the “swine flu“
vaccine?
"We're alarmed that one of our products was used, in what appears to have been a deliberate
scheme, to adulterate a life-saving medication, and that people have suffered as a result," Baxter
Chief Executive Robert Parkinson said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00940720080429"We deeply regret that this has happened, and I feel a strong sense of personal responsibility forthese circumstances," he said.
Under the current set of regulations, acts and provisions, it would be possible for a bioterrorist
organisation that has access to the production facilities or to the 1,200 liter bioreactors or that
could influence the composition of vaccine material to kill all Americans by contaminating thevaccine material and forcing them to take it without adequate checks or face being shot.
Theoretically, the lethal effect of the vaccination could be delayed or triggered by a second
substance.
Dr. Marc Girard predicted this Bird Flu disaster.....he was however the one behind the decision ofFrance to stop use of the Hep B vaccine due to autoimmune disease. He has seen hwever, thiscoming where the vaccines are not even worth the risk and yet they keep recommending them.

Dr. Marc Girard was commissioned as a medical expert witness by a French judge in a criminal
inquiry in France in September 1994 into deaths following a campaign of vaccination against
hepatiris B upon the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO).
In an open letter to the then WHO Director- General, he indicates that WHO is guilty of criminal
misconduct.
http://www.impfkritik.de/forum/showthread.php?t=534„While much information concerning World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on
vaccines, particularly against hepatitis B, remains secret, there is sufficient evidence in the open
literature to suggest scientific incompetence, misconduct, or even criminal malfeasance. The
benefits are overstated and toxicity greatly understated. Influenza vaccine recommendations
falsely imply that the available vaccines could help prevent avian influenza,“ he writes.

French judges investigate vaccine manufacturer for manslaughter
March 19th, 2008
In what was called a “thunderclap in the vaccine industry,” French authorities have opened aformal investigation concerning a hepatitis B vaccination campaign by GlaxoSmithKline andSanofi Pasteur in the 1990s. It is alleged that the companies failed to fully disclose neurologic side
effects. Another investigation opened by Judge Marie-Odile Bertella-Geffroy concerns the death48(“manslaughter”) of a 28-year-old woman from multiple sclerosis, allegedly connected to thevaccine (Le Figaro 1/31/08).
>From 1994 to 1998, almost two-thirds of the French population and almost all newborn babies
were vaccinated against hepatitis B, but the campaign was temporarily suspended because ofconcerns about side effects.
Some 30 plaintiffs, including the families of five patients who died after the vaccination, havelaunched civil actions (Reuters 1/1/08).
A British case-controlled analysis showed an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI 1.5-6.3) for firstsymptoms of multiple sclerosis in recipients of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine compared tocontrols. Two previous French studies had shown a RR of about 1.5. Other studies showed anonsignificant increase or null findings, especially when date of diagnosis rather than date of firstsymptoms was used (Neurology 2004;63:838-842).
According to attorney Clifford Miller, “British doctors administering hepatitis B vaccine to
infants could face criminal prosecution if fully informed consent is not obtained. Civil prosecution
for damages is possible over 21 years later if the injured survive as adults” (UK Press Association
Newswire/Romeike, September 2005).
The hepatitis B vaccine has been considered “one of the safest vaccines ever produced”(Neurology, op. cit.). On the other hand, French medical expert Marc Girard has said that “for a
preventive measure, hepatitis B is remarkable for the frequency, variety and severity ofcomplications from its use” (Romeike, op.cit.)

http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/girard.pdf

He gives evidence that WHO systematically manipulates scientific data to exaggerate the benefitsof vaccines and playdown the risks.
„Meanwhile, WHO or its “experts” go on publishing reassuring statements based upon an explicit
reference to a safety study that, according a public communiqué of February 2000, even the
Frenchagency decided to “discard.”An unfortunate misprint in Table 2 of this study—uncorrected to myknowledge—allows the authors to halve the clear increase of multiple sclerosis in vaccinatedteenagers and young adults. Such an error would normally lead one to suspect fraud.
Girard calls WHO „merely a screen for the commercial promotion“ of vaccines.
He says notes that apparently neutal government boards are packed with vaccine company
employees.
„ In the promotion of the hepatitis B vaccination, WHO has evidently served merely as a screen
for commercial promotion, in particular via the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB), which
was created, sponsored, and infiltrated by the manufacturers. In September 1998, after the serious
hazards of the campaign had been given their first media coverage in France, the VHPB organizeda panel of “experts,” whose reassuring conclusions were extensive media coverage as reflecting
WHO’s position. Yet some of the participants in this panel had noexpertise beyond being employees of the manufacturers, and the vested interests of therest did notreceive any attention.“

World Health Organization Vaccine Recommendations: Scientific Flaws, or Criminal
Misconduct?

49
Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons Volume 11 Number 1 Spring 2006
http://www.drbriffa.com/blog/2007/02/19/world-health-organisation-accused-of-impropersoliciting-of-funds-from-the-pharmaceutical-industry/World Health Organisation accused of improper soliciting of funds from the pharmaceuticalindustry
Posted on 19 February 2007
It seems that not a week goes by without some information leaking out about the sometimes toocosy relationship that can exist between the pharmaceutical industry and organisations we rely on
for giving us impartial health information and advice. This particular week’s story concerns
accusations that a representative of the World Health Organisation (WHO) attempted to solicit
funds from the pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline, and then siphon them through anorganisation to obscure the source of the those funds.
The individual at the centre of this controversy is Dr Benedetto Saraceno, director of the WHO’s
department of mental health and substance abuse. It is alleged that he was seeking £5000($10,000; 7000 euros) to pay for the preparation for a report on neurological diseases including
Parkinson’s disease. The WHO has a strict policy that forbids it from taking funds from thepharmaceutical industry, and quite right so.
However, in an email that has been passed to the British Medical Journal, Dr Saraceno appears tosuggest that to get around this, money from GSK should be paid to an organisation known as theEuropean Parkinson’s Disease Association (EPDA). In an email to the EPDA, Dr Saraceno writes“WHO cannot receive funds from the pharmaceutical industry,” and goes on to add “I suggest that
this money should be given to EPDA and eventually EPDA can send the funds to WHO which
will give and invoice (and acknowledgment contribution) to EPDA but not to GSK.”
It is alleged that GSK promptly withdrew its offer once it became clear they would not be
officially recognised as the source of this funding.
Since the somewhat—damning correspondence came to light, it seems that Dr Saraceno has
attempted to do some major backtracking. He claims that his original email to EPDA was“clumsily worded” and that he denied ever suggesting that funds from GSK be siphoned throughthe EPDA. Personally, I find it hard to imagine what it is about the wording of Dr Saraceno’s
email to the EPDA that is in any way clumsy. And neither does Mary Baker - the person at the
EPDA to whom Dr Saraceno was writing. She is quoted as saying “There is absolutely no doubt
in my mind that Dr Saraceno knew the $10,000 was coming from GSK and that he was intending
to take it and disguise its origins by getting EPDA to accept it first before passing it on.”When the BMJ put its concerns about this rather distasteful episode to the WHO, a spokesman
apparently replied “It’s astonishing that the BMJ thinks there’s a story here. Dr Saraceno sent a
second email saying he had not meant to ask for the money. So I don’t think there’s anything toanswer.” Does the WHO really believe that just because one of its employees denies impropriety,even when presented with evidence that appears to suggest otherwise, that there is no case toanswer? I have a feeling that many who learn of this sorry state of affairs would beg to differ.
References:
1. Day M. Who’s funding WHO? British Medical Journal 2007;334:338-340

X. Evidence Novartis is using vaccines as bioweapons.

The bird flu trials conducted by Novartis in 2008 offers evidence that companies are designing
their trials of pandemic flu vaccines for adverse events, that is, for disease and death.

50
Novartis, one of the companies tasked with developing a “swine flu” vaccine by Defendant HHS,
employed fraudulent misrepresentation and manipulated the vaccine licencing procedure to pass
off a substance that is a bioweapon as a harmless vaccines for prophylactic, protective, andpeaceful purposes when it tested a bird flu vaccine on homeless people in Poland.
Novartis’s trials of a FLUAD-H5N1 bird flu vaccine in Poland in the summer of 2008 resulted in
the deaths of as many as 21 homeless people according to the Telegraph.
http://hygimia69.blogspot.com/2009/04/france-24-health-workers-on-trial-for.html“The medical staff, from the northern town of Grudziadz, is being investigated over medical trials
on as many as 350 homeless and poor people last year, which prosecutors say involved an untried
vaccine to the highly-contagious virus.
Authorities claim that the alleged victims received £1-2 to be tested with what they thought was aconventional flu vaccine but, according to investigators, was actually an anti bird-flu drug.
The director of a Grudziadz homeless centre, Mieczyslaw Waclawski, told a Polish newspaperthat last year, 21 people from his centre died, a figure well above the average of about eight.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/2235676/Homeless-people-die-afterbird-flu-vaccine-trial-in-Poland.html
Other reports state three doctors and six nurses are on trial for testing the bird flu vaccine on
nearly 200 patients without their knowledge.
http://hygimia69.blogspot.com/2009/04/france-24-health-workers-on-trial-for.html
Health workers on trial for vaccine scam in Poland
Nine health workers went on trial in northern Poland Monday accused of having tested a vaccine
against bird flu on nearly 200 patients without their knowledge, court officials said.
The accused -- three doctors and six nurses -- are charged with "fraud, creating false documents
and delivering health care without authorisation" to 196 patients, judge Piotr Szadkowski of the
Torun region told AFP.
If found guilty, they risk up to 10 years in jail.
All nine accused, some reportedly clad in wigs and sun glasses to avoid being identified, pleaded
not guilty.
The medical personnel are charged with administering a vaccine banned in Poland against thedeadly H5N1 strain of bird flu that can be transmitted to humans.
The patients were paid for the vaccines, Polish news agency PAP reported.
They allegedly led their patients, many of them poor and homeless, to believe they were being
vaccinated against ordinary flu.
Police discovered the scam by chance when they were called to break up a fight at a homelessshelter, PAP said.
-

51
The FLUAD-H5N1 drug being tested was approved for market in the European Union on May 2,
2007 before it was tested on the homeless in Poland and proved to be lethal.
This vaccine is for “government use in case of pandemic caused by Avian Influenza virus“ also
for US government use.
”Novartis has also received contract from US DHHS to further develop MF59C.1 adjuvant
technology to potentially extend vaccine supplies in case of Influenza pandemic outbreak“”Represents "mock-up vaccine", filed as normal step for eventual accelerated approval of final
vaccine once a pandemic has been declared; Initial preparations were made with viral strain H5N3
(1999) and H9N2 (2004); File submitted for approbation in 2006 was based on clinical trials
conducted with various strains of Avian Influenza virus, but more specifically with reverse
genetic-engineered strain H5N1 A/Vietnam/1194/2004, with adjuvant MF59C.1;
Vaccine will eventually contain pandemic Avian Influenza strain designated by WHO at the timeof pandemic, along with adjuvant MF59. “
http://www.antiviralintelistrat.com/1/Database?prod=1737
Perhaps this lethal drug got a licence because the primary outcome listed for the study was“adverse events rate” after two doses. That is to say, its success was measured in terms of its
capacity to cause injury and damage. That is why the drug no doubt got the licence because it
proved to be very damaging indeed and so met the primary outcome desired by Novartis
according to the official documents of the trial.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00434733
Immunogenicity, Safety and Tolerability of Two Doses of FLUAD-H5N1 Influenza Vaccine in
Adult and Elderly Subjects
This study has been completed.
First Received: February 12, 2007 Last Updated: April 23, 2008 History of Changes
Sponsors and Collaborators:

Novartis
Novartis Vaccines

Information provided by: Novartis

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00434733
PurposeThis study is designed to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of 2 doses of
FLUAD-H5N1 vaccine compared to 2 doses of trivalent, interpandemic FLUAD, eachadministered 3 weeks apart.

Condition

Intervention

Phase

52
Influenza

Biological: Pandemic influenza vaccine

Phase III

MedlinePlus related topics: Bird Flu Flu
Drug Information available for: Fluvirin Influenza Vaccines
U.S. FDA Resources
Study Type:Interventional
Study Design:

Prevention, Randomized, Single Blind, Active Control, Parallel Assignment,
Safety Study

Official Title:

A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blind, Multicenter Study to
Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Safety and Tolerability of Two Doses of FLUADH5N1 Influenza Vaccine in Adult and Elderly Subjects

Further study details as provided by Novartis:
Primary Outcome Measures:•

Adverse event rate
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00434733
Secondary Outcome Measures:•

Seroconversion and seroprotection after two doses of H5N1 vaccine

Estimated Enrollment:

4400

Study Start Date:

January 2007

Eligibility
Ages Eligible for Study:
Genders Eligible for Study:
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Criteria

18 Years and older
Both
Yes

Inclusion Criteria:•

Healthy Subjects 18 years of age who signed the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:•

Receipt of another investigational agent within 4 weeks•

Receipt of influenza vaccination for current season 2006/2007.

•

any acute disease or infection, history of neurological symptoms or signs, known orsuspected impairment of immune function, any serious disease, bleeding diathesis•

fever (defined as axillary temperature ³38.0°C) within 3 days (prior to Visit 1)

53•Pregnant or breastfeeding or females of childbearing potential who refuse to use an
acceptable method of birth control
Surgery planned during the study period••

Hypersensitivity to eggs, chicken protein, chicken feathers, influenza viral protein,neomycin or polymyxin or any other component of the study vaccine•

Receipt of another vaccine within 3 weeks prior to Visit 1 or planned vaccination within 3
weeks following the last study vaccination
History of (or current) drug or alcohol abuse••

Any condition, which, in the opinion of the Investigator, might interfere with theevaluation of the study objectives.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00434733

Locations
PolandCentrum Badań Farmakologii Klinicznej monipol
Kraków, Poland, 30-969
Sponsors and Collaborators
Novartis
Novartis Vaccines
Investigators
Study Chair: Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics GmbH & Co KG Novartis
More Information

Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics

No publications provided
Study ID Numbers:

V87P4, 2006-005428-18

Study First Received:

February 12, 2007

Last Updated:

April 23, 2008

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT00434733

Health Authority:

Poland: Central Register of Clinical Trials (CEBK)History of Changes

Keywords provided by Novartis:
Influenza H5N1, pandemic
Study placed in the following topic categories:
Virus Diseases
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Respiratory Tract Infections

Influenza, Human
Influenza in Birds
Orthomyxoviridae Infections

Additional relevant Mesh terms:
Virus Diseases
RNA Virus Infections
Respiratory Tract Diseases

Respiratory Tract Infections
Influenza, Human
Orthomyxoviridae Infections

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 17, 2009

54
Back to top of Main Content

U.S. National Library of Medicine, Contact Help Desk
U.S. National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services,

When damage and injury, however, are listed as the primary outcome, this is no longer medicine.
This is murder.
Any vaccine for a pandemic influenza should have to be thoroughly evaluated through trials andresearch to prove its safety, efficiency, efficiency, quality and beneficial health effects if agovernment is going to be in compliance with its duty under normative justice to issue a licence
for that vaccine.
Moreover, vaccines and drugs should have been tested for their beneficial health effects in several
clinical phases for safety and efficacy before they can be released to the general public. This is atime consuming process often taking years to complete. There is no short cut to following theseprocedures when it comes to safety.
Any new vaccine has to be evaluated at many levels: Phase 1: safety, Phase 2: safety andimmunogenicity, Phase 3: large- scale trials for efficacy and Phase 4: post- marketingsurveillance.
It is criminal for a vaccine material that has as its stated primary desirable outcome “adverse
events rate” after two doses rather than “positive events rate”, that is, beneficial effects on thehealth of the patient, to be injected into patients.
It is a crime to produce a vaccine whose overwhelming intention is to produce “adverse events” ordamage to the people who are injected with the drug as the FLUAD-H5N1 does. It is a crime toapprove that vaccine for the market on the basis of it producing “adverse events rate”.
If I make a drug saying its success is measured in terms of “adverse events” and to damage
people, I am conspiring to commit pre-meditated assault or murder using a bioweapon and an
injection as the delivery system. If I actually use that drug and kill people I have committed pre
meditated murder using a bioweapon and an injection as a delivery system.
The doctors and nurses involved in the bird flu trials in Poland are now on trial for having
withheld from their victims information about the drug, presenting it instead as a harmless, routine
shot. In so far as they have violated the requirement to obtain informed consent, they haveviolated the medical law. In so far as their actions led to the deaths of others, they have violated
criminal law.
Are the people of the United States going to be forced to take an unproven, untested vaccine suchas the one produced by Novartis, fully licensed but licensed to cause adverse events, that is to say,to kill and injure?
Novartis along with Baxter is one of the two major companies with contracts to produce millionsof doses of swine flu vaccines for a mass compulsory vaccination.
„Novartis has also received contract from US DHHS to further develop MF59C.1 adjuvant
technology to potentially extend vaccine supplies in case of Influenza pandemic outbreak.“55
http://www.antiviralintelistrat.com/1/Database?prod=1737“CompanyMarket Cap2009 P/E5-year Earnings GrowthTechnology
Novartis (NVS)$85 B10x10%Cell-based vaccines
Baxter (BAX)$30 B13x12%Cell-based vaccines
Gilead (GILD)$40 B18x15%Anti-viral drugs
Crucell (CRXL)$1.5 B50x30%Cell-based vaccinne
Gilead will receive royalties on every dose of Tamiflu sold by Swiss-based Roche. The current
efforts to beef up emergency stockpiles of Tamiflu could add $80 million to Gilead’s bottom line
within two years.
Novartis, Baxter, and Crucell are each developing vaccine-production methods to replace ourantiquated system (which uses chicken eggs). From start to finish, each of the new approaches cangenerate an original vaccine within 12 to 16 weeks.
Novartis already has the genetic code of the current swine flu virus. Now, it’s waiting for an actual
sample of the virus to arrive in its labs. Baxter expects a sample, as well, in the next few days.”

XI. Evidence as to the WHO’s role in the bioweapons program

The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN) thatacts as a coordinating authority on international public health. Established on 7 April 1948, andheadquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the agency coordinating international efforts to monitor
outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as SARS, malaria, and AIDS.
WHO is currently working with Collaborating Center in Atlanta (The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) in the United States of America) and vaccine companies such as Baxter andNovartis to develop “candidate vaccine viruses” for 4 billion people by autumn of the world’s
population, enough to achieve an 80 per cent reduction in the world’s population.
There is evidence that WHO itself is playing a role in exposing the populations of the world to therisk of a pandemic virus that could kill billions of people.
Though Dr Margarent Chan, the Director General of WHO, is technically a public servant and has
the duty as part of her official capacity to act at all times in such a way as to safeguard the healthof the world's population, there are grounds for believing WHO is abusing its administrative
structures, personnel and services actually “misusing“ pandemic material and pandemic
declarations to assist organisations, companies, government bodies or other entities intent on
unleashing a pandemic virus and then carrying through a mass vaccination programme withcontaminated material in order to gain political and economic advantages from mass murder.
WHO supplied the the “wild” bird flu virus from its reference laboratory that Baxter AG in

56
Austria then used to produce 72 kilograms of contaminated bioweapon material that nearly
triggered a pandemic.
In spite of the fact Baxter was involved in a scandal involving vaccines tainted with deadly avian
flu virus, WHO chose Baxter head up efforts to produce a vaccine for the Mexican swine flu thathas seemingly migrated into the U.S. and Europe.
Baxter has confirmed it is working with the World Health Organization on a potential vaccine forswine flureports the Chicago Tribune.
Baxter has previously worked with governments all over the globe to develop and produce
vaccines to protect against infectious disease or potential threats from bioterrorism. After 9/11
Baxter helped supply stockpiles of a smallpox vaccine and in 2003 the company was contracted todevelop a vaccine to combat the SARS virus. In 2006 the UK Government announced plansdesigned to inoculate every person in the country with Baxter’s vaccines in the event of a flu
pandemic.
Even though Czech newspapers immediately questioned whether the events were part of aconspiracy to deliberately provoke a pandemic, there was no in depth investigation by WHO
resulting in recommendations for the tightening of standards or for charges at Baxter made public.
Since the probability of mixing a live virus biological weapon with vaccine material by accident isvirtually impossible, this leaves no other explanation than that the contamination was a deliberateattempt to weaponize the H5N1 virus and distribute it via conventional flu vaccines to the
population who would then infect others to a devastating degree as the disease went airborne.
Baxter has put the safety of the entire human race at risk together with WHO, and now, that same
company, Baxter, is seeking a sample of the potentially lethal never before seen form ofswine/avian/human flu virus and WHO has chosen it to develop a new vaccine, reaping billions in
the process.
Why should Baxter be entrusted with this task by WHO, when Baxter have already been proven to
be at the very least criminally negligent, and at worst a prime suspect in attempting to carry off
one of the most heinous crimes in the history of mankind unless WHO is involved?
So, under the guise of helping to coordinate the response to a pandemic, WHO is actually helping
vaccine companies to develop and also release the pandemic viruses with impunity by providing
funds, licences and authority.
Though Dr Margarent Chan, the Director General of WHO, is technically a public servant and has
the duty as part of her official capacity to act at all times in such a way as to safeguard the healthof the world's population, there are grounds for believing WHO is abusing its administrative
structures, personnel and services actually “misusing“ pandemic material and pandemic
declarations to assist organisations, companies, government bodies or other entities intent on

57
unleashing a pandemic virus and then carrying through a mass vaccination programme withcontaminated material in order to gain political and economic advantages from mass murder.
The World Health Organization, together with the UN, will be given authority over the US in theevent of a pandemic under a decree issued by President George Bush in 2005.
When WHO sends such a "declaration" to President Obama, FEMA and the Department ofHomeland Security "Pandemic Task Forces" will be deployed according to my information.
Each State Governor will be notified that the provisions of the Model State Emergency HealthPowers Act (MSEHPA) will be implemented. This means that all Americans must consent tomass vaccinations, or be guilty of a FELONY crime.
The legal situation is that anyone who refuses the vaccine, and/or resists forced relocation to a
prepared "quarantine compound", can "legally" be shot and killed. (Justified "deadly force".) See
http://www.forhealthfreedom.org/Pub...ModelState.html
On Friday April 24, following the „swine flu“ scare in Mexico, WHO ordered officers to man the"Pandemic Control Room" 24/7 for the first time and was reported to be about to declare a"pandemic".
The WHO "Pandemic Control Room" is designed to map and track the spread of a pandemic
virus, and is thus equipped with super-computers tied to all U.N. member government's security
forces.
This "control room" is where any declarations of "pandemic" will originate from.
WHO appeared to be ready to declare a pandemic prematurely as a pretext to rush throughemergency laws and mass compulsory vaccination program with contaminated or faulty vaccine
material that could result in death or injury to people as happened in the mass swine flu
vaccination program of 1976.
WHO intentionally manipulated information on the swine flu outbreak to play up the danger of apandemic in order to justify the declaration of a pandemic and the implementation of a massvaccination programme while ignoring and suppressing information that indicates WHO’s drastic
response is not proportionate to the risk, especially the evidence that many people have recoveredfrom the „swine flu“ with just rest and hydration.
WHO’s assessment of the dangers of this swine flu was by far the most pessimistic with the CDC
recommending just customary precautions.
WHO identified about 80 fatalities at a time when the Mexican government itself confirmed only
16 from this new flu strain.
The new strain of the so called „swine flu“ appeared in Mexico and America simultaneously, andunder "mysterious circumstances" also indicating a deliberate, planned and coordinated release of
the synthetic laboratory engineered viruses.
But WHO only began investigating the "mysterious" incident after the Austrlian virologist Adrian
Gibbs said in an interview he thought the virus had come from a lab.
It is WHO’s especial duty, given this precedent in 1976, to make sure no mass vaccination
programme is implemented unless that causes injury to the general public is implemented under58
WHO’s auspices by WHO declaring a pandemic prematurely and without having adequate
safeguards in place to ensure the high quality and safety of any vaccine material.
However, WHO immediately contracted Baxter, the very same company that nearly triggered apandemic by releasing 72 kg of live bird flu material in winter to produce huge amounts ofvaccine for the „mysterious“ swine flu.
Again, it was the WHO reference center which provided Baxter with the particularly lethal wild
type bird flu virus that ended up contaminating ordinary human flu material and being distributed
to 16 laboratories in Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Germany under a false label, so
nearly sparking a bird flu pandemic this winter in the estimation of experts and the media.
Virus mix-up by lab could have resulted in pandemic (6 Mar 2009)http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4230882.cms
In the Baxter case of this winter, there is therefore a clear, well documented link between WHO
and the release of pandemic bird flu material in Europe this winter.
The WHO is, according to reports, conducting an investigation into Baxter and Avir's role inproducing and distributing this material, but has so far not made public the results of its
investigation or made recommendations in respect of stricter biosecurity rules for laboratories
working with the highly pathogenic bird flu virus.
Under the biosafety 3 regulations an accidental contamination of the deadly bird flu virus strain
WHO sent from its reference center to Baxter with a human flu is virtually impossible.
WHO’s failure to conduct a full and detailed investigation into the „Baxter incident“, and to makethose findings public or to make clear recommendations as to how to prevent a repeat of thisincident is not merely a failure to perform their duty as a public health body, but evidence of theirrole in covering up the real origin of the pandemic virus, specifically, in WHO's own reference
center.
I contend that WHO and Baxter and other vaccine companies are working together to deliberately
trigger a pandemic with the aim of profiting from it by sealing in advance lucrative contracts to
supply a vaccination.
I contend that high offices in organisations such as the WHO have been annexed by criminal
elements who are actually helping to further a criminal agenda of committing murder with the
motive of robbery - albeit using covert bioweapons programmes.
Given the fact that this Baxter incident happened only a few weeks ago and WHO is involved in it
in as far as it supplied a) a lethal strain of the bird flu virus and b) is investigating the incident, it
is surprising how quickly WHO gave Baxter a contract to work on the swine flu.
Although many researchers and NGOs issued warnings that resurrecting this lethal Spanish flu
virus was dangerous to the public, WHO has been one of the biggest supporters of continuingresearch into this bioengineered virus and into its "antidotes" spending millions, if not billions, oftax payers dollars on research or „creation“ and then on „vaccination“ and „prevention“
programmes.
Jeffery K. Taubenberger of the Department of Molecular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of
Pathology into the bird flu virus and specifically his reconstruction of the deadly strain of the bird
flu virus from the genetic material retrieved from victims of the Spanish flu pandemic of 19181919.

59

It was only in the summer of 2008 that researchers published evidence that showed that the bird
flu can mix with the human flu virus to produce a pandemic virus in a laboratory situation.
That same summer Novartis tested ist bird flu vaccine for „adverse events“ on homeless people in
Poland, causing deaths and injury.
There is therefore, plenty of evidence from the documents and reports even within the publicdomain to show that WHO and their allied pharmaceutical companies and other agents, including
the European Union, are knowingly and intentionally creating pandemic virus material, testing it
and releasing it.
There is evidence from the pattern of WHO’s activities that, under the color of their office while
purporting to act in an official capacity, members of the organisation are actually acting on behalfof hidden crime interests intent on igniting a pandemic and misusing a declaration of a pandemic
to gain political and financial advantages, a group which designated in these charges as theIlluminati crime gang.
The declaration of a pandemic by WHO has direct political and financial and other advantages toelements in the US government, especially elements belonging to the Illuminati/Bilderberg/ NewWorld Order/CIA/Freemason crime gang.
For one thing, many high level associates of the Illuminati are now being considered forinvestigation for sanctioning torture in violation of the US and international law, specifically
Donald Rumsfeld (who has financial connections with an anti bird flu Tamiflu producer), Richard
Cheney and Alberto Gonzales.
The imposition of martial law on the pretext of a pandemic will help those individuals suspectedof violating laws to torture to avoid prosecution in the United States, although a case is being
pursued in Spain.
Furthermore, elements of the Illuminati have knowingly and intentionally manipulated thefinancial system for their financial gain, first by sucking in huge amounts of money, and then by
imploding the system.
WHO is knowingly and intentionally, helping the Illuminati achieve their political goals ofcontrolling the millions of newly impoverished Americans by giving the government a pretext todeclare martial law and implement a mandatory vaccination program.
Further evidence of WHO’s role in facilitating the covert bioweapons program by the Illuminati
against the people of the United States comes from the recent case of VICL
In spite of the fact that WHO has said on its own website that the vaccine candidate viruses would
only be available by mid May, Vical Incorporated (VICL 2.13, -0.12, -5.33%) announced on May
21st that in the two weeks since launching its program to develop a vaccine against H1N1
influenza (swine flu), the company has completed development of a prototype H1 vaccine,produced an initial supply of research-grade material, and initiated immunogenicity testing inanimals.
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/frequently_asked_questions/vaccine_preparedness/en/ind
ex.html

60
According to the WHO website: “A vaccine for the Influenza A(H1N1) virus will be produced
using licensed influenza vaccine processes in which the vaccine viruses are grown either in eggs
or cells. Candidate vaccine strains have been identified and prepared by the WHO Collaborating
Center in Atlanta (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States ofAmerica)1. These strains have now been received by the other WHO Collaborating Centers whichhave also started preparation of vaccine candidate viruses. Once developed, these strains will be
distributed to all interested manufacturers on request. Availability is anticipated by mid-May.”
How can VICL have completed development of a prototype H1 vaccine, produced an initialsupply of research-grade material, and initiated immunogenicity testing in animals even before thecandidate vaccine was grown and released to companies unless VICL itself was involved in
making the virus in the first place.
How can VICL have won a contract with the Navy for clinical testing of a vaccine when thecandidate virus has not even been released by WHO?
“The first doses of Influenza A(H1N1) vaccine could be available in five to six months fromidentification of the pandemic strain. The regulatory approval will be conducted in parallel withthe manufacturing process. Regulatory authorities have put into place expedited processes that do
not compromise on the quality and safety of the vaccine. Delays in production could result frompoor growth of the virus strain used to make the vaccine,” WHO says on its website.
VICL is working to a very different time plan.
„Assuming a successful outcome of this testing and a commitment for program-specific externalfunding, the company is ready to advance directly to large-scale cGMP manufacturing of vaccine
for human clinical trials to be conducted by the U.S. Navy.
The company previously announced that it has entered into a Cooperative Research andDevelopment Agreement (CRADA) with the U.S. Naval Medical Research Center (NMRC), a
biomedical research organization within the U.S. Navy, to advance into clinical testing as quickly
as possible a Vaxfectin(r)-formulated H1 DNA vaccine. Vical and the NMRC are actively
pursuing funding to support the program.“
Criminal charges have also been brought against WHO, Baxter and the Swiss National Influenza
Laboratory in Geneva for their role in an alleged bioterrorist attack in Switzerland on April 27th.
(see Attachment (B) for charges in German)
A container with vials of swine flu virus exploded on a Swiss Intercity train at peak time,
exposing 61 people to a potentially lethal virus.
(http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKTRE53R1PO20090428)
The container appears to have come from a WHO and Baxter affiliated laboratory in Mexico City.
It was destined for the National Influenza Laboratory of Switzerland in Geneva, but wasapparently sent by plane to Zurich where it was picked up by a technician.
The container was faultily packaged. The dry ice meant to cool the vials was packed into thewrong part of the container and resulted in an explosion as the dry ice melted in the train
compartment.
The allegation is that these groups were acting in unison to rlease a virulent strain of the virus
among the Swiss population and cause panic in an attempt to justify triggering a pandemic level 6

61declaration from which they would reap enormous financial and political profits, including, in thecase of WHO and the affiliated UN, the right to assume control over key US infrastructure.
A virus of this sensitive nature should not have been sent in a high speed commuter train packed
with people. It should have been classified as a hazardous material and sent by a third party.
Furthermore, it was alleged the container was not “faultily” packed as claimed, but deliberately
designed to explode and spray out particles of the virus among passengers.
An Intercity train, a more or less enclosed, air conditioned space with constant variables such astemperature and packed with people, is an ideal place to launch a bioweapons attack.
It was contended that the container used for transporting the vials resembled a CO2 bomb. Dry ice
packed into the middle ring of a hermetically sealed container evaporated when it melted,
producing vapour. The vapour expanded and the growing pressure led to the explosion of the vialsof « swine flu and to the bursting of the container.
The blast was sufficient in force to injure the technician charged with transporting the package aswell as a passenger.
Through this explosion, the virus was aerosolised and spread around the compartment. It can beassumed it went into someone’s lung, carried by the shockwave of the explosion outwards.
It was alleged that dry ice or solid carbon was chosen because most bomb sniffers - dog andelectronic alike - look for sulfur and nitrogen compounds found in black powder, ANFO, etc.
Solid carbon or CO2 is in the air already, so detecting it and discriminating from natural
background sources is harder.
The container used to transport the vials should have had a vent hole to allow the pressurebuilding up from the melting dry ice to escape. It should also have been made of plastic if it werethe conventional type of container for carrying medical supplies.
Because the container had no such vent hole and was made of a robust material, the evaporating
CO2 pressurized the container, and the vials of swine flu.
Once the outer case burst, the inner vials underwent a similar explosive decompression, instantly
vaporizing their contents as a mist filled with microrganisms.
It was alleged that the “organisers” of this bioterrorist act planted misleading information into thegeneral public that the virus was harmless when it isn’t to spread the lethal Mexican pandemicstrain by sending their agents from the National Influenza Laboratory in Geneva to the scene of
the explosion to reassure the police that the virus was harmless.
In spite of the fact that the credibility of the laboratory staff was severely compromised by theirdecision to send the vials by train and by the faulty packaging of the container, the police did notcarry out a forensic investigation.
As a result, the infected passengers were allowed to go home without any preventative treatment
or plans for the monitoring of their health.

XII. Evidence as to deliberate release of the “swine flu” virus in Mexico

62

Virologist Adrian Gibbs said that the “swine flu” was leaked from a lab and, interestingly, Baxter
has large-scale production and research facilities close to Mexico City, where the outbreak of the“swine flu” occurred.
The “mysterious origin” of the swine flu was underlined by the Mexico’s Chief Epidemiologist
M.A. Lezana, who said that among the first mortalities was a Bangladeshi born street vendor in
Mexico City who fell ill in early April. The man is said to have met his brother in Merida, Yucatan
in early April and returned to Mexico City before he died. The assertion is that the brother, aBangladeshi or a Pakistani, was also ill.
(http://ahrcanum.wordpress.com/2009/05/05/baxter-pharmaceutical-plant-in-mexico-ground-zerofor-flu-outbreak/)
Edgar Hernandez of La Gloria fell ill with a fever and headache in early April according to hismother Maria del Carmen Hernandez. His mom took him for healthcare, and he recovered swiftly.
The Financial Times timeline says it was April 2.
Mexican officials confirm that Edgar Hernandez did carry the A/H1N1 virus, but they have notconfirmed any other resident did or does. No one else in Edgar’s family got sick at all. A statepublic health doctor says, “We just don’t know how he (Edgar) got sick. Maybe it was a genetic
accident of some kind.”Also, the Financial Times timeline points to a La Gloria health official requesting assistance inFebruary for an outbreak of an acute respiratory disease; and on April 6 there was a health alert in
La Gloria with 400 seeking medical treatment.
How did Edgar Hernandez become positive if not for the pigs of La Gloria? And why cannot
Smithfield find the A/H1N1 in one million pigs — all of whom will be slaughtered soon enoughunless that Bangladeshi subplot fleshes out. More soon.
One thought from http://www.naturalnews.com/026141.html notes,” it is astonishing to realize,
because for this to have been a natural combination of viral fragments, it means an infected birdfrom North America would have had to infect pigs in Europe, then be re-infected by those samepigs with an unlikely cross-species mutation that allowed the bird to carry it again, then that bird
would have had to fly to Asia and infect pigs there, and those Asian pigs then mutated the virus
once again (while preserving the European swine and bird elements) to become humantransmittable, and then a human would have had to catch that virus from the Asian pigs — in
Mexico! — And spread it to others in order to assist the World Health Organization in developing
a new vaccine, reaping billions in the process. ”
Just 50 miles from the H1N1 ground zero outbreak in Mexico City, lies Baxter’s manufacturing
plant in Cuernavaca, Mexico. It was named one of the 10 Best Plants in North America for 2008
by Industry Week magazine.
http://www.baxter.com/about_baxter/news_room/news_releases/2008/12_19_08_industryweek.ht
ml
The plant manufactures, “Water for Injection, Devices Medical, Premixes Formulations,”
according to http://www.alibaba.com/member/juanbaxter/aboutus.html. What else do they
manufacture there? What kind of water gets injected? Germ Warfare? Bio Hazards? Virus
Mutations? Vaccines? Cures or Causes?

63
Baxter was also responsible for the mislabeled, recalled doses of Heparin. Baxter recalled one lotof a product that hospitals use to treat burn victims and patients in shock after a test found a rare
form of HIV in the plasma used to make the product. HIV-2 in plasma!
http://www.aegis.org/news/ct/2001/CT010716.html. Baxter also manufactures a vaccine against
tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) and a vaccine against group C meningococcal meningitis.
http://www.baxtervaccines.com/?node_id=312 , in addition to other pharmaceutical products,
anesthetic’s, pumps, etc.
http://www.ecomm.baxter.com/ecatalog/browseCatalog.do?lid=10001&cid=10016
The National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) has a satellite campus located in
Cuernavaca, which is aimed at research and graduate studies. It also has an undergraduate
program in genomics.
Cuernavaca is the home of the following research centers: Center for Genomic Sciences(UNAM),[3] the Institute of Biotechnology (UNAM),[4] the Institute of Physical Sciences(UNAM),[5] the Center for research in Energy (UNAM), the Institute of Mathematics (UNAM),
the Center for Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences (UAEM),[6] and the National
Institute of Public Health. Cuernavaca has the highest concentration of scientists and researchersin Latin America. -WIKI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuernavaca Cuernavaca is certainly awho’s who in genetics and research.

XIII. Evidence as to the involvement of President Obama

Since President Obama visited Mexico on April 16, the virulent flu has stricken more than 1,000
peeple, killing nearly 70 of them, including one person the President met at a museum.
Obama was received at Mexico’s anthropology museum in Mexico City by Felipe Solis, adistinguished archeologist who died the following day from symptoms similar to flu, Reforma
newspaper reported.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=home
A federal agent who traveled to Mexico with President Obama this month probably contracted
swine flu and infected several members of his family in Anne Arundel County, prompting
assurances yesterday from the White House that the president was safe.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/30/AR2009043001836.html"[President Obama’s} doctors have advised him that his trip to Mexico has not put his health inany danger," said spokesman Josh Earnest.
White House aides declined to discuss what steps the President's doctors have taken, such as
testing for the illness or inocculations, but one suggested he has not been tested.
"I can tell you that the President doesn't have any symptoms, and his doctors advised that there
was no need for him to be tested," the aide said.
That is likely because the swine flu has a short incubation period of less than three days, and thePresident would have shown symptoms even before he returned home if he had been infected.
(http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/04/26/2009-04-64
26_white_house_president_obama_does_not_have_swine_flu_from_recent_mexico_trip.html#ixz
z0GnOgyRRk&B)
Under the color of an official government trip, a lab engineered virus was unleashed in Mexico, aforeign country chosen to distract attention from their own involvement, in order to profit
politically and financially from a pandemic declaration.
The appearance of the swine flu coincided with President Obama’s visit. A high level museum
official, who was healthy enough to meet the President in Mexico City, died the next day
indicating he had received a lethal dose of a toxic virus. A federal agent who travelled with the
President also contracted the disease. However, the President himself was not even tested for theswine flu. I contend that the key staff of the President saw no need to test the President because
they knew he had been vaccinated in advance against the virus that the team helped release.
President Obama went into Mexico and left unscathed in spite of the growing “swine flu”
emergency.
“Authorities canceled school at all levels in Mexico City and the state of Mexico until further
notice, and the government has shut most public and government activities in the area. The
emergency decree, published today in the state gazette, gives the president authority to take moreaction.”http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aEsNownABJ6Q&refer=home“The federal government under my charge will not hesitate a moment to take all, all the measuresnecessary to respond with efficiency and opportunity to this respiratory epidemic,” Calderon said
today during a speech to inaugurate a hospital in the southern state of Oaxaca.
At least 20 deaths in Mexico from the disease are confirmed, Health Minister Jose Cordova said
yesterday. The strain is a variant of H1N1 swine influenza that has also sickened at least eightpeople in California and Texas. As many as 68 deaths may be attributed to the virus in Mexico,
and about 1,000 people in the Mexico City area are showing symptoms of the illness, Cordoba
said.”In the event of a level 6 pandemic level designation from the WHO, President Obama has theright to implement emergency measures: Americans would be subject to compulsory vaccinations
and possible detention because of the Patriot Act I, Patriot II, BARDA, BioShield I, BioShield II,
BARDA, Federal or State Emergency Medical Powers Acts, FEMA and other laws, provisions
and regulations.
Also, as the pressure increases on Obama to produce a valid Birth certificate, Obama and his
international criminal syndicate backers are seeking to accelerate the declaration of a Pandemic
Level 6 by WHO to avert the political destablisation of their front man.
Lawsuits have been filed contesting that Obama is ineligible to be President of the United Statesof America because he is not a natural-born citizen as defined by US law because, among otherreasons, Hawaii, the birthplace of Obama’s mother was not a state.
„Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. citizen
parents. US Law very clearly stipulates: ".If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of yourbirth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which
had to be after the age of 16." Barack Obama's father was not a U.S. citizen and Obama's motherwas only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. citizen for 10 years,

65(or citizen perhaps because of Hawai'i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for atleast 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama's birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn't matter *after*.
In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. citizenship. At most,there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama's birthwhen she was 18 in Hawai'i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, atthe time of Barack Obama's birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned,
she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old atthat time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent.
Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him fromholding the office.“
So far, President Obama has not produced verifiable, unambiguous evidence that he meets thecriteria of a natural born citizen. We contend Obama is actually the member of a foreign-based
crime gang that has used fraudulent means to get their member Barack Obama in office so they
can use him as an instrument to take control of the economic, political and military structures of
the USA.
The plan is to give him the powers of a dictator under the pretext of implementing martial law todeal with a pandemic or a false flag nuclear attack or the consequences of hyperinflation that thesame group have themselves engineered by manipulating the financial markets and creating debt.
Once martial law is declared, Homeland Security will be used to terrorise the population of the
USA taking on a role similar to the Gestapo in Nazi Germany to enforce mass vaccinations,imprisonment in FEMA camps and quarantines in towns and cities. A wave of arrests is planned toarrest and kill all political opponents.
Further, a bill calling for an audit of the Federal Reserve, which is gathering steam in Congress,
could reveal the extent of the financial crimes committed by the Federal Reserve Chairman andhis international backers, a further reason for the crime elite to seek an excuse to declare martial
law to destroy opponents and evidence of their crimes.

XIV. Evidence as to WHO’s manipulation of disease data in order to justify declaring a Pandemic
Level 6 in order to seize control of the USA.

F. William Engdahl discusses the way WHO is seeking to amplify the dangers associated with theswine flu, which so far was has been so mild that it is indistinguishable from ordinary flu.
At a press conference on June 11th, the CDC confirmed that 27 people had died so far from theswine flu in the US but 36,000 people die from the seasonal influenza every year.
„According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the average global burden of interpandemic influenza may be on the order of 1 billion cases per year, leading to 300,000-500,000
deaths worldwide. In temperate climate zones, seasonal epidemics typically begin in the late Falland peak in mid-winter, infecting about 5-15% of the population each season, while In tropicalzones the virus can be isolated year-round. The disease can affect all age groups, but rates ofinfections are highest among young children who spread the virus and are a potential source of
infection in older age cohorts, whereas rates of serious illness, complications and death are highest

66
in persons aged 65 years and older, as well as in persons with chronic cardiac or respiratory
conditions. The efficacy of vaccination in reducing the burden of the disease, as well as the
economic burden of treating influenza, is well established.“*WHO redefined “Pandemic” as “Widespread, spreading from human to human but notparticularly dangerous” changing it from its previous definition of “widespread, rapidly spreading
and very dangerous in order to justify the Pandemic declaration.
If the WHO doesn’t declare a Pandemic Level 6 every year when the seasonal flu wave kills tensof thousands of people in the USA, then why declare a Pandemic Level 6 now when the swine flu
has killed only 27 people?
WHO’s rushed to declare a Pandemic Level on June 11th when the CDC said in a press
conference that the number of cases was decreasing was because such a declaration triggers thehand over of power over the USA and other parts of the world to WHO and the UN, front
agencies for the international global elite.
In a report dated June 5th, (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13856), F.
William Engdahl takes a shot at the „flying pigs“ swine flu.
The WHO Plays with Pandemic Fire
The Continuing Saga of the Flying Pigs Pandemic Flu
by F. William Engdahl.
Global Research, June 5, 2009

According to information from within the World Health Organization in Geneva, the UN
organization supposedly monitoring global health dangers, WHO Director-General Margaret Chanplans to declare a Phase 6 Official Pandemic Alert in the coming days. This bizarre act if declared
would come at a time that the country which had to date reported far the latest number of suspected
H1N1 cases, the USA, has simply arbitrarily stopped reporting new cases.
If you consider to let your family get scared into taking drugs like Tamiflu that not only do notprevent or even ameliorate symptoms of flu, but in some cases are so toxic they cause severe
paralysis, breathing problems and even death, you should at least know the facts before.
The report that WHO may declare an official Pandemic global alert any time is all the more bizarre
given the fact that the global wave of cases reported to date to WHO from around the world
reportedly have been so mild as to be indistinguishable from the symptoms of ordinary flu.
And the relatively small number of deaths alleged tied to swine flu as it originally was named,
appear in no way definitely tied to to H1N1 causes. In a May 28 CDC press briefing, the CDC
reported, ‘When we look at our deaths, we have information on 11 of the 12 deaths that have beenreported to us so far. And it appears that 10 of those fatalities occurred in people who had anunderlying condition that put them at greater risk for severe complications of influenza.’ That iswhat epidemiologists call correlation not causality or ‘opportunistic infection’ deaths.
European epidemiologists privately believe that there is no proven link between supposed H1N1
Influenza A illness and the deaths, rather that the deaths are ‘coincidence’ or what health

67
professionals term ‘opportunistic infections.’ The CDC report would seem to strengthen thatargument.
US CDC stops regular reporting?
Even more bizarre for a supposed pandemic ‘threat to all mankind’ the official monitoring agency
in the nation with so far the largest number of reported case counts, which notably include‘probable’ ad well as ‘confirmed’ H1N1 cases, namely the United States, the CDC announced en
passant, on that May 28 press briefing that, ‘beginning next week, we're going to shift to a different
schedule. We'll be updating our case count information less frequently.’ That statement came from
Dr. Anne Schuchat, Deputy Director for Science and Public Health Program of the US Centers for
Disease Control. She declined to say what ‘less frequently’ was or even why such a decision wasreached at the same time the US Government is dedicating billion dollars fast track funds to drugmakers to produce H1N1 vaccines.
Oops! Wait a minute. I thought we were teetering on the edge of declaring a global Pandemic
Emergency, Phase 6 where travel restrictions, mandatory quarantine and other extreme steps would
be implemented. Then the responsible national agency in the country with something like 67% of
all reported cases of H1N1 Swine Flu decided casually not to report so often?
Another anomaly in the increasingly bizarre situation is the release of new WHO Pandemic
guidelines on April 20, 2009, conveniently enough just in time to affect the current world pandemic
scare. According to a WHO official responsible for the report, the revision of revised 2005 WHO
Pandemic guidelines was begun ‘well before the Mexican flu cases were first reported.’ The official
spoke off record.
Even more curious is the fact that the latest April 2009 WHO Pandemic response guidelines
prescribe the exact same response for Phase 5 (sub-pandemic) and Phase 6 (so-called Pandemic),
namely ‘implement actions as called for in their national plans.’ For that we need WHO?
Drug giants gearing up
The situation is becoming a golden harvest for the giant pharmaceutical makers as they receive
samples from the CDC to begin producing possible vaccines as well as so-called antiviral drugs
like Tamiflu.
The US government recently made available one billion dollars to help big vaccine makers like
Sanofi-Aventis and GlaxoSmithKline ready production of new vaccines. Novartis leads the herdwith $289 million in federal support, followed by Sanofi Aventis with $191 million and
GlaxoSmithKline, which gets $181 million. In addition the US Government had decided to ‘derisk’ the vaccine production, presumably removing usual safeguards for new vaccines. The US
Health and Human Services Department (HHS) is placing orders with manufacturers with which it
already has contracts to produce a pandemic vaccine for the never-pandemic H5N1 avian flu. Morethan $3 billion in federal funds since 2005 have gone toward developing, building manufacturing
and stockpiling a vaccine to fight that disease. How long do such vaccines hold in stock?
Fittingly given the bizarre nature of the entire Flying Pigs panic being spread by WHO and CDC,
the CDC reports that it expects the first H1N1 approved vaccines to be ready by Halloween. Trickor Treat?
In Australia the government has ordered 10 million doses of a new vaccine being developed by
CSL. CSL plans to start producing a new vaccine in the next days that can be used for humantesting. A vaccine based on the California strain of the virus is being tested in ferrets. China says

68
that it will have samples of swine flu on hand by June and plans to start manufacturing a new
A/H1N1 vaccine in July.
Many drugmakers are using techniques of genetic manipulation to produce their new vaccine
offerings in a race to market. The Maryland drugmaker Novavax which reported severe annual
income losses prior to the current Swine Flu scare, now is preparing a genetically modified vaccine
they claim is suitable for H1N1 flu.

The 1976 Swine Flu fiasco
Once WHO declares a Phase 6 Pandemic Alert, all hell could break loose with governments andpopulation going into panic, cancellation of international travel, severe domestic travel restrictions
and other emergency measures resembling martial law.
In 1976 President Gerald Ford issued an Executive Order calling for every man woman and child in
the USA to be vaccinated against a suspected outbreak of swine Flu at the Fort Dix US militarybase. Within months more than forty million unknowing Americans had been vaccinated, some
20% of the then total population despite the fact that no pandemic ever appeared. The flu wasrestricted to Fort Dix.
Interestingly, aside from severe weather and crowded barrack conditions at Fort Dix, every recruit
coming in had immediately been given multiple vaccinations as routine, similar to what US soldiers
are given today before being shipped to Iraq or Afghanistan, or similar to what US and European
soldiers were given in 1918 during the spread of the misnamed Spanish Influenza of 1918. Was theFort Dix wave of illnesses and one death a consequence of the vaccinations? We may never know
as no government agency was interested in pursuing the notion.
In that 1976 US swine flu panic, aided by a nervous President eager to win re-election, there werethirty deaths due to adverse vaccine reactions and dozens if not hundreds of cases of the rare
Guillain-Barre syndrome which led to halting of a national vaccination that was being given for a
non-existent pandemic.
Free from liability?
There was one very significant difference between 1976 and today however. In 1976 US insurancecompanies refused to insure vaccine manufacturers against lawsuits for vaccine-related illnesses ordeaths. Today drugmakers need have little fear of damages from product liability lawsuits. They
can unleash whatever substances the FDA lets them, and indications are that under Pandemic
declaration safety standards would be dropped in the rush to stab the population as widely as
possible with vaccines.
Under rulings made under the Bush Administration, vaccines can be labelled as “unavoidably
unsafe” meaning that when a product is ‘carefully designed, manufactured and marketed, but isdangerous nonetheless,’ it is not a defective product, even though it might cause injury. Clear? It
certainly is clear to the pharmaceutical industry which lobbied hard for the determination.
A decisive victory for the drug industry came in January 2006 when Bush Administration Healthand Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt announced a new ruling in defiance of establishedprecedent and the expressed intent of Congress. The new FDA rules pre-empted any state laws thatallow citizens to sue drugmakers for producing unsafe drugs under the dubious claim that the FDA,an agency under HHS, had national responsibility for certification of drug safety and state lawsuits
impinged on that national responsibility. As several Congressmen at the time pointed out the FDA

69
track record for timely response to clear drug dangers as in the Vioxx cases was hardly to thebenefit of the health and welfare of citizens suffering needless heart attacks and death as a side
effect of the drug.
It would be relevant to ask if the Democratic Congress that protested the 2006 FDA liability-freeruling has plans to change that free ride for vaccine makers. That might do more than anything to
reduce the effects of Swine Flu. Then people might realize where the real swine danger lies.

XV. Evidence as to FDA’s role in covering up the bioweapons program

There is evidence that the criminal activities of the vaccine companies are covered up bycomplicit FDA offiials.
The FDA failed to complete an inspection of Baxter’s. Scientific Protein plant in China thatshould have been conducted in 2004 because regulators confused the plant with another with asimilar name, according to the agency, thereby allowing the contamination of the heparin.
The FDA may have been able to have prevented contaminated heparin from reaching the U.S. if
the agency had completed the 2004 inspection, said David Nelson, an investigator for the energy
and commerce panel, who testified before the panel.
While there wasn't contamination at the time, Nelson said an inspection may have identified
shortcomings, including procedures to ensure the ingredients it purchased were pure. The FDA
failed to complete an inspection of the Scientific Protein plant in China that should have been
conducted in 2004 because regulators confused the plant with another with a similar name,according to the agency.
Baxter inspected the plant in September and found no major deficiencies, said Nelson. In
February, the FDA sent inspectors to the plant and uncovered ``significant deviations'' fromstandard practices, he said. He questioned whether the Baxter inspection was sufficient.
The inspections were done ``at different points in time'' for different reasons, Baxter's Parkinson
said. The company's inspection was routine, while the FDA's was ``for cause'' after the recall.
``That leads to a very different type of inspection,'' Parkinson said.
``Our investigations have revealed an FDA woefully lacking in the personnel, effective policies,
and the will at the highest level to perform the duties entrusted to it by the Congress and theAmerican people,'' said Representative John D. Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, during the hearing.
The FDA would need an additional $225 million annually to inspect overseas drugmakers every
two years, said Janet Woodcock, head of the FDA's drug division. The agency plans to spend $11
million this year for overseas inspections, according to the Government Accountability Office, theinvestigative arm of Congress.
The FDA conducts annual inspections of about 7 percent of overseas drugmakers that ship to the
U.S., a pattern suggesting it would take 13 years to visit them all, according to the GAO.
Representative Michael Burgess, a Republican from Texas, also raised alarm that heparinappeared to have called the contamination ``thuggery'' and ``thievery'' and said it was an ``knife in
the back'' of the American public.

70
Bayer pharmaceutical company documents (from its Cutter Biological unit), made public during alawsuit, revealed that in 1985, Bayer and the FDA colluded by knowingly and deliberately
putting thousands of hemophiliacs at risk of death by selling an AIDS-infected blood clotting drugin Asia and Latin America. See: http://www.ahrp.org/infomail/0503/22.php
The New York Times reported that FDA official, Dr. Harry Meyer, willingly helped Bayer coverup "one of the worst drug-related medical disasters in history." Meyer suggested that the issue
should be "quietly solved without alerting the Congress, the medical community and the public."
Attorney, Mike Papantonio http://www.ringoffireradio.com/mike_papantonio.asp, who with
Robert Kennedy Jr, co-hosts, Ring of Fire, said in an interview with MSNBC's Joe Scarboroughthat this lethal product was also sold in Spain, France, and Japan, killing thousands--especiallychildren.
He stated emphatically that the internal documents show that Bayer "absolutely, positively knew
[the product] was infected and would likely kill thousands of people" but that it set out to "profit
by disaster." see video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS3mhjt7TrY&search=Bayer
When the French government learned of it, company officials went to jail. In the US nopharmaceutical corporate criminals have ever been held accountable nor indicted
Bayer was one of the companies that issued contracts for unknown medical substances to be
injected into Nazi concentration camp inmates during the second world war.
The FDA is a government body whose officials must act, therefore, in accordance with themandate of the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights to eliminate the risk of death and injury
concerning vaccines and other medicines as the Preamble, Constitution and Code, from which all
government bodies derive their legitimacy, requires.
“The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or USFDA) is an agency of the United States
Department of Health and Human Services and is responsible for regulating and supervising thesafety of foods, dietary supplements, drugs, vaccines, biological medical products, blood
products, medical devices, radiation-emitting devices, veterinary products, and cosmetics.”
However, I contend the FDA is deliberately, willfully and knowingly failing to do its duty toinspect and control vaccine companies employing devices, schemes and artifices to subvert theregulations such as going to the wrong plant for the inspection out of “confusion” because key
personnel within the FDA, including Defendant Dr Margaret Hamburg, are following instructions
for a cover up from the very same international crime syndicate that is using those same vaccine
companies to commit covert mass murder, and to profit from that mass murder.
The FDA Chief Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. has committed perjury before Congress after it
was discovered that he gave misleading information about the fraud involved in the approval ofthe dangerous antibiotic drug Ketek made by Sanofi-Aventis.
“FDA Chief in Very Hot Water with CongressThursday, February 14, 2008 - Byron J. Richards, CCN
It now appears that the FDA Chief Andrew von Eschenbach, M.D. has committed perjury before
Congress...
The FDA is now ignoring Congressional subpoenas of its records, setting up another showdown
between Congress and the Bush Administration. Unlike former showdowns, national security is

71
not involved. Will the Bush administration offer protection for a situation that involves needlessdeaths to Americans? The Chinese sentenced to death the head of their FDA for far lesser
misdoings.
The issue revolves around the fraud-riddled antibiotic Ketek which is made by Aventis, now
Paris-based Sanofi-Aventis. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-IA, has been holding the FDA’s feet to thecoals on the Ketek issue for the past several years ever since an 18 year old boy from Iowa was
killed by the antibiotic when being treated for a routine infection. There are other deaths andmany cases of liver failure. The House Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee has been
looking into the matter since early last year, shortly after von Eschenbach’s permanent
appointment to head the FDA.
The available evidence paints a picture of the FDA turning this deadly drug loose on children eventhough it knew of safety problems, a trail of evidence von Eschenbach has actively covered up. In
the face of Congressional scrutiny the FDA has since scaled back it’s approved use of Ketek, but
has left it on the market to treat pneumonia. The FDA blames Aventis for the problems, who isalso in hot water with Congress. The FDA is refusing to hand over records showing what it knew
and when. Insider information indicates significant FDA wrongdoing.
We already know that a clinical trial involving the drug was forged by a weight loss clinic in
Gadsden, Alabama. The physician in charge, Dr. Maria Anne Kirkman-Campbell, is now serving
five years in prison. Congress has been trying to get to the bottom of the matter, seeking toestablish what Sanofi-Aventis and the FDA knew. Congress has hit a stone wall. It appears theyboth knew plenty – and covered their tracks.
The House Subpoenas FDA Records
Congress finally had enough. On January 25, 2008 John Dingell and Bart Stupak of the House
Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee sent a memorandum stating they intended to
subpoena FDA investigators, a private contractor, and various FDA records, which they followed
through on several days later.
On February 12, 2008 the House committee held hearings on the matter. Douglas Loveland, aspecial agent at the FDA’s criminal-investigation office, told the committee that Aventis shouldhave known there was fraud and there was a “catastrophic failure” of their clinical trial systems.
They ignored “red flags” about the bogus data, “they were loud signals…they were brightsignals.”
The FDA even admits that it knew there were “serious protocol violations and regulatory
noncompliance by multiple clinical investigators” and that it had no knowledge these problems
were ever fixed before approving the drug. However, the FDA is not forthcoming about
information that may indicate a von Eschenbach cover-up.
Last March von Eschenbach provided written testimony to the committee on events surrounding
the Ketek drug approval. The committee subsequently learned from an FDA insider and thosefamiliar with the approval that the testimony was not truthful. The committee had recently
subpoenaed the FDA records regarding the preparation of this testimony to learn why it was liedto.
On February 12, 2008 the committee was told by the parent of the FDA, the Health and Human
Services Department, that these documents would not be provided because “The department hasserious concerns about providing the kind of materials the committee has subpoenaed…suchhighly confidential and deliberative materials used to prepare witnesses testifying before Congress

72
risks chilling the open exchange of views that is essential to the effective conduct of agency
business.” A more skeptical outsider like myself would interpret this to mean “that when people
are killed the FDA is above the law and doesn’t need to disclose relevant information.”
Dingell is not taking the matter lying down: “What is in those briefing books that he does notwant either my Republican colleagues or our side to see? Is there evidence of perjury? Are there
statements embarrassing to the administration?” He went on to say that “Neither Chairman Stupak
nor I will tolerate such a perversion of Congressional powers to investigate and probe.” His next
step to get the von Eschenbach records may be to hold Michael Leavitt, the HHS Secretary, incontempt of Congress – setting up a major showdown with the Bush Administration.
FDA Whistleblower
Dr. David Ross served as the FDA’s primary safety reviewer on Ketek. He was concerned about
liver damage as early as 2000 and was stunned by the fact that the U.S. clinical trial contained
blatant fraud. Back in 2003 he wanted to give this information to the FDA advisory panel thatwas deciding if Ketek was safe to use for the public. FDA management prevented him from doing
so and purposefully withheld information from the advisory panel about the ongoing criminal
investigation.
Ross buckled to FDA management pressure and omitted the safety risks and his concerns about
Ketek from his final report. This all happened prior to von Eschenbach coming to the FDA.
Under von Eschenbach’s tenure as temporary head of the FDA the Ketek problems began to hit
the fan. Congress started actively looking into the matter and von Eschenbach went into damage
control mode. He called a meeting of 40 FDA employees regarding Ketek issues andmysteriously Ross was invited to this meeting (he no longer worked on the Ketek issue).
Ross has reported that during the meeting von Eschenbach likened the workings of the FDA to a
football locker room, where differing views can be vented but that once on the field the teamspeaks with one voice and any FDA staff who speaks differently will be warned the first time,benched the second time, and traded the third time.
In the face of such a blatant effort to suppress the truth of the situation Ross turned whistleblower.
He has told Congress that the FDA approved Ketek “despite knowing that it could kill people
from liver damage and that tens of millions of people would be exposed to it.”Grassley Predicted the Unethical Behavior of von Eschenbach
Back in February of 2007 Senator Grassley informed the House committee of the extensive natureof the FDA cover-up on Ketek as well as other issues, including FDA disregard for Congressional
investigation.
Von Eschenbach is a cancer-industry insider who took the job at the FDA so he could get quick
approval of new biotech drugs while using humans for cruel experiments in the name of“progress.” His nomination as permanent head of the FDA took place during the 2006 lame ducksession of Congress and was rubber stamped by Big Pharma friendly Senators. Senator Grassley
knew better, as he stated on the floor of the Senate during the confirmation hearings:“People ought to be ashamed of saying Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach has done a superb job in theposition he is currently occupying [acting head of the FDA].…That is an insult….In myinteractions with the Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA these last 8 months,
I have seen a complete and utter disrespect for congressional authority and hence the law.… This

73
body [the Senate] should not walk hand in hand with the executive branch and sit idly by asinstances of abuse and fraud continue to endanger the health and safety of American people.”
As Grassley’s warning fell on deaf ears, Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a man whose pockets are lined withBig Pharma money, rose in defense of von Eschenbach:“To me it is simply unconscionable that the Food and Drug Administration, one of the best little
agencies in Government, has gone leaderless for such a period of time…I know Dr. vonEschenbach well. He is a man of integrity….I urge my colleagues—no, I implore mycolleagues—to do what is right and vote [for] this nomination….it is what the American people
deserve.”
Indeed, as history notes, the American people got von Eschenbach – a drug company sales rep
sitting in the hot seat atop the dysfunctional FDA, an organization of unelected bureaucrats whoare certain they are above the rule of law and certain they have nice jobs waiting for them in the
Big Pharma world.

XVI. Evidence as to the Canada’s National Microbiology Labs role in the bioweapons program

Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory, a public health reference laboratory that has a duty toprovide scientific excellence and quality assurance, sequenced the first Mexican and Canadian flu
samples said that the genetic sequence of the H1N1 flu virus from Mexico and Canada is thesame.
However, other scientists have found three distinct strains.
Two polymorphisms are different between the virulent Mexican and mild Canadian strain of theswine flu. It is too early to tell if these polymorphisms will be of clinical significance or not. Thatsaid, a national laboratory is required by law to supply accurate and comprehensive informationon the genome sequences of the swine flu virus strains.
The lab should have provided a full and comprehensive analysis including the different in thepolymorphisms because its analysis will be the basis for the development of a vaccine.
The wrong genome sequence analysis could lead to the wrong vaccination and could potentiallycause harm, loss of life.
“Mexican and Canadian Swine Flu -- Not The Same”
http://dc-chemical.us/?q=node/35
Regarding the genetic analysis of Mexican Swine Flu vs. Canadian Swine Flu -- There are SNPs
on PA and PB2 , which are ONLY present in the Mexican strain -- a sequence released by Dr.
Plummer's own laboratory! The fact that this difference was in his own data should bring into
question the credibility of government health labs' ability and will to protect the public interest..
Suppose we use New York / Canada as the consensus strain. There are two unique polymorphisms
found ONLY in Mexico (so far, anyway):

74
Whether or not these SNPs are clinically significant is another question entirely -- the fact is, theyshould have been addressed, rather than suppressed.”
If the Canadian laboratory falsely classifies the mild strain of swine flu as the lethal Mexican
strain, it will have ramifications.
The Canadian government is entitled to use criminal law to deal with outbreaks of diseases.
Clearly, the government would not be able to claim such a drastic mandate unless the public were
led to believe the danger was great.
The analysis of the laboratory could also be the basis for the production of vaccine material. If thelaboratory has got it wrong, then the vaccine companies are likely to get it wrong.
For that reason, the Canadian laboratory, flowing from its obligation as a public health bodyestablished to provide scientific excellence and quality assurance, should, at the very least, havegiven the entire sequence, including the two different polymorphisms and made it clear that there
was a difference between the Mexican and Canadian strain.
The laxity at the Canada's National Microbiology which contains some of the world's mostdeadliest pathogens was underlined when Canadian scientist was stopped at the U.S. border after
authorities found 22 vials used in Ebola research in his car.
Konan Michel Yao, 42, was apprehended by U.S. officials as he attempted to enter the UnitedStates at the Pembina, N.D., border crossing from Manitoba on May 5, 2009.
Yao faces U.S. criminal charges for smuggling and is currently in the custody of the U.S.
Marshals service.
Yao working at the agency's special pathogens laboratory on an Ebola vaccine project when his
research term ended in January.
The head of the lab admitted that Yao vel 3 and 4 pathogens, such as the swine flu virus, HIV andEbola virus and that "There was…genetic material from the Ebola virus in the material that hetook off with.“
Canada's public health agency did not know the vials were missing until it was contacted by the
RCMP, which had been alerted by U.S. border services, Plummer said.
The matter has also been referred to the Winnipeg Police Service, which has not yet decided
whether to lay charges.
The National Laboratory did not inform the police about the missing vials.

XVI. Evidence of the involvement of scientists working for the UK’s NIBSC, and the CDC inengineering the swine flu.

Len Horowitz, expert on emerging diseases who worked at the research faculty at Harvard Schoolof Dental Medicine, has alleged that there is a network of genetic engineers manipulating,mutating, and distributing viruses.
In an interview on the Alex Jones show, Dr. Horowitz urges an investigation of Dr. James S.
Robertson, Englands leading bioengineer of flu viruses for the vaccine industry, and avid

75
promoter of U.S. Government funding for lucrative biodefense contracts, along with collaborators
at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
James Robertson is a scientist in the division of the National Biological Standards Board (NBSB)
is a non-departmental public body (NDPB) of the UK government NIBSC, is working closelywith the WHO and other international agencies in developing a candidate vaccine virus andassociated reagents that are required by the vaccine manufacturing industry to produce swine flu
vaccine.
It has been alleged that these suspects helped Novavax, Inc., in Bethesda, Maryland, produce
genetically-modified recombinants of the avian, swine, and Spanish flu viruses, H5N1 and H1N1,
nearly identical to the unprecedented Mexican virus that is allegedly spreading to the UnitedStates at the time of this posting.
„The outbreak was precisely timed to promote the company's new research and huge vaccine
stockpiling contracts.
Scientists at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are implicated through collaborations
and publications involving private contracts with Novavax, a company that obtains its biosimulars
through CDC Influenza Branch director, Ruben O. Donis, and Dr. Rick Bright, previously
working with Donis at the CDC, now Novavaxs Vice President of Global Influenza Programs.
Descriptions of this virus is pathognomonic, or diagnostic, of a virus that came from Robertsons
circle of friends, Dr. Horowitz charges. No other group in the world takes H5N1 Asian flu infected
chickens, brings them to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines their proteins with H1N1 viruses
from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in swine flu genes from pigs, then reverse
engineers them to infect humans. The end product could only have ended up in Mexico via theUnited States from Britain in care of the CDC. The CDC had to have sent them to Novavax,
where Rick Brights team is now implicated in a conspiracy to commit genocide—the mass killingof Consider people for profit.“
http://involuntaryservant.blogspot.com/2009/04/dr-len-horowitz-names-specific.html

XVII. Evidence vaccinations caused the Spanish killer flu of 1918.

"The 1918 'Spanish Flu' started in American military Camp Funston, Fort Riley, USA amongst
troops making ready for W.W.I - taking on board vaccinations, recruit training and all. It
eventually killed about 40,000,000 people worldwide. That flu strain only appeared briefly once
again, according to the US Atlanta CDC. This was in 1976 and again it struck at the US army
camp Fort Dix, USA, amongst recently vaccinated troops (and no one else EVER); Fort Dix is
known to have been a vaccine trial centre. Was the world's greatest 'influenza' scourge anotherwell-hidden vaccine disaster?"---John P Heptonstall
Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which
vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-sevensoldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals werefilled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic wascalled "the Spanish Influenza," a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended toconceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were
the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu recalled

76"the Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers
make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.--Eustace Mullins
In 1918, the US Army forced the vaccination of 3,285,376 natives in the Philippines when no
epidemic was brewing, only the sporadic cases of the usual mild nature. Of the vaccinatedpersons, 47,369 came down with small-pox, and of these 16,477 died. In 1919 the experiment was
doubled. 7,670,252 natives were vaccinated. Of these 65,180 victims came down with small-pox,
and 44,408 died. In the first experiment, one-third died, and in the second, two-thirds of theinfected ones died. ----- from Dr. William Koch's book, The Survival Factor in Neoplastic andViral Diseases.
"Soldiers DID die following the injections which contained mercurous chloride otherwise known
as CALOMEL. There WAS a widespread campaign for mercury containing vaccines. There WAS
also an outpouring of propaganda [such as our present day SARS, MONKEYPOX, SMALLPOX
hype] to frighten the public, there WERE large numbers of deaths at the time, all blamed on“Spanish Flu”. Of course the Spanish Flu was just as bogus in the early 1900s as Swine Flu was in
the 70s when President Ford faked his vaccination and helped set our country up for a REAL
epidemic [vaccine induced, iatrogenic, Guillaine Barre syndrome]. Spanish Flu was as bogus as
the more recent WEST NILE VIRUS, AIDS, SARS, SMALLOX and MONKEYPOX is today.
They are killing the innocent and the ignorant today, just as they have in the past. The deaths fromthe great flu epidemic of 1918 were caused by the use of CALOMEL, the major biological poison
used to treat “sepsis” as it was called in those days. CALOMEL is mercurous chloride and wasused by the medical quacks of that day for “anything that ailed you”. Mercury is a deadly poison."Dr. Duffy[Vaccines] It was transmitted like wildfire among troops in trenches and camps on the Western
Front of World War I, and returning US and Canadian soldiers brought it back to North America,
where hundreds of thousands more people were killed. As for the source of the virus, various
investigations have pointed at a huge British army base in northern France and the United States,
as well as Spain. http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18/20090430/thl-1918-flu-pandemic-killed-2-64-mlnin-5effa79_1.html
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf1.html
Biological weapons have a long history of use. In 1346, the invading Tartar army catapulted thebodies of plague victims into the Crimean Peninsula city of Kaffa and infected its citizens. In
1763, British troops under General Jeffrey Amherst gave the Delaware Indians blankets used bypeople with smallpox, possibly infecting the susceptible native population.
Medical historians have concluded that the Spanish flu “epidemic” of 1918, which killed an
estimated 50 million people, was caused by the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war inwhich vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen.
The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month.
As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but withcasualties of the vaccine.
In 1948 Heinrich Mueller, the former head of Nazi Germany’s Gestapo, told his CIA Interrogatorthat the most devastating plague in human history was man-made.
He was referring to the influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 that infected 20% of the world’s
population and killed between 60 and 100 million people. This is roughly 3 times as many as were
killed and wounded in World War One, and is comparable to WWII losses, yet this modern plague

77
has slipped down the memory hole.Mueller said the flu started as a US army bacteriological
warfare weapon that somehow infected US army ranks at Camp Riley KS in March 1918, andspread around the world.
At a 1944 Nazi bacteriological warfare conference in Berlin, General Walter Schreiber, Chief ofthe Medical Corps of the German Army told Mueller that he had spent two months in the US in
1927 conferring with his counterparts. They told him that the “so-called double blow virus” (i.e.
Spanish Flu) was developed and used during the 1914 war. “But,” according to Mueller, “it got
out of control and instead of killing the Germans who had surrendered by then, it turned back onyou, and nearly everybody else.” (”Gestapo Chief: The 1948 CIA Interrogation of Heinrich
Mueller” Vol. 2 by Gregory Douglas, p. 106) Actually the Armistice took place Aug 11, 1918.
http://elliotlakenews.wordpress.com/2006/12/08/was-the-spanish-flu-man-made/According to Dr. Jerry Tennant, the widespread use of aspirin during the winter that followed theend of The Great War could have been one of the key factors that contributed to the earlier
pandemic by suppressing the immune system and lowering body temperatures that allowed the flu
virus to multiply. Like aspirin, modern-day antiviral drugs like Tamiflu® and Relenza® also
lower body temperatures, and therefore can also be expected to contribute to the spread of apandemic.
„What is new about this virus is that it has a mixture of DNA from animals, birds, and humans!
Normally viruses are species specific. Viruses that cause illnesses in hogs can rarely betransmitted to humans, but that virus usually cannot be transmitted human-to-human. Althoughsome express confusion about how this virus could have mutated in a way that a hog virus and abird virus could mix with a human virus and cause human to human transfer, it is known thatmixing of viral DNA has been done in laboratories.
Except for the fact that the DNA of this virus is suspect, we should not expect to have an epidemic
that kills many people. One of the reasons is that viruses usually do not kill people—they justmake you feel bad. What killed the majority of people in 1918 was that the flu allowed people toget bacterial pneumonia from Streptococcus. That is what kills you. We are much better able todeal with bacterial pneumonia now than they were in 1918.
However, the genetically altered viruses like the AIDS virus have killed many. That is the reason
for current concerns.
In 1897, the German company Bayer patented aspirin. Their patent expired in 1917, just at the endof World War I. Many of the returning American soldiers brought it back to their families. It was
the first time that there had been widespread use of aspirin with the flu. It is known that when avirus attaches to a cell, it cannot duplicate if there is a fever, but it will make a million copies ofitself if the temperature is low. Thus lowering temperature with drugs allows viruses to multiply!
It is also known that aspirin and drugs like it suppress the immune system making it easier forbacteria to grow. This makes it easier for pneumonia to occur. It is not clear how much aspirin
contributed to the spread of the 1918 flu. A current problem is that the antiviral drugs, Tamiflu®
and Relenza® lower body temperature. It is not uncommon to see people get the flu and start oneof these drugs. They feel better. Then a week later, they have pneumonia.
Since 2003, there have been multiple warnings that the H5N1 bird flu virus would kill millions ofpeople. Only 257 people are known to have died from the bird flu! Over 1,000,000 people getmalaria every year, but there are no dire warnings from the World Health Organization or
President Obama about malaria!

78
Can there be other reasons that we are being frightened about a flu pandemic? The Bushadministration bought $1.4 billion of Tamiflu® "to combat the bird flu". The Obamaadministration wants to buy enough to treat 25% of the American population. Other governments
are stockpiling it as well. This is despite the fact that Tamiflu® doesn't work for the bird flu and is
not likely to work for the swine flu either. "After following WHO protocols in treating 41 victimsof the H5N1 bird flu virus (19% of the worldwide cases of bird flu reported to date), Nguyen
Tuong Van, MD, who runs the intensive care unit of the Center for Tropical Diseases in Hanoi,
Vietnam concluded that Tamiflu®, the drug most widely stockpiled around the world to combat a
potential bird flu pandemic, is "useless". (Wikipedia) Thus, the American taxpayers paid billionsof dollars for a drug to treat about 100 cases per year of the bird flu. Someone made a lot ofmoney from a drug that does not work for an epidemic that never happened. They are making
even more money this year. If only we were using that money for something useful like treating
malaria!“ writes Tennant.
Scientists are opposing a plan in Japan to mass vaccinate against the “swine flu” on the grounds
that the virus will re-assort itself into a hybrid H1N1/H5N1 strain or mutate into a new, morelethal H5N1 strain. The nightmare scenario is that the mutated virus may take on thecharacteristics of H5N1 or the avian flu
http://www.rense.com/general85/a1.htm„The AH1N1 virus has infected some 100 students in Kobe, Japan. Many of the students have nohistory of traveling abroad. There are plans underway to begin a mass vaccination against
AH1N1. However, there are misgivings in the international research community aboutadministering an AH1N1 vaccine.
The fear is that once a vaccination against AH1N1 is started, the virus will re-assort itself into a
hybrid H1N1/H5N1 strain or mutate into a new H5N1 strain. The current AH1N1 strain, as
previously reported by WMR, contains synthetically gene-spliced strains of two forms of human
flu viruses, two forms of swine flu viruses, and a single form of avian flu virus.
What researchers have told us is that as long as the current AH1N1 can infect humans, it will not
try to mutate. Even though there have been deaths from AH1N1, most of those infected are sickfor up to four days, take Tamiflu or similar drugs, and recover with immunity from the hybrid or"novel" virus. The vaccination program will be a profit maker for such Big Pharma firms as
Sanofi-Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline and Baxter International.
However, with vaccinations, the AH1N1 virus will, of course, be rejected by human hosts andcases around the world will decrease. However, then, the virus will begin to mutate in order tosuccessfully infect human hosts. And when that happens, the new, newly-mutated virus will
become much more transmissible and more pathogenic.
The nightmare scenario is that the new, mutated virus may take on the characteristics of H5N1 or
the avian flu. The vaccines administered for AH1N1 will be ineffective against the new strain of
H5N1 and the world may face a more deadly pandemic then the current AH1N1 outbreak. There
are scientists at WHO who are aware of this scenario but their alarm has been suppressed bypolitical and economic considerations. „A lack of quality control of the vaccinations is as much a problem today as it was in 1918.
In the US, the differing standards applied by different groups are due to the fact that experiments
on engineered viruses such as the 1918 flu are approved on a case-by-case basis by Institutional

79
Biosafety Committees (IBCs), composed of local scientists and officials. Critics say these are free
to interpret the official guidelines in a way that suits them.
“There is no effective national system to ensure consistency, responsibility and good judgement insuch research,” says Edward Hammond of the Sunshine Project, a biosecurity pressure group in
Austin, Texas. In a review of IBCs published this month, he found that many would not provide
minutes of recent meetings as required by law.
He says the IBC that approved the planned 1918 flu study at the University of Washington
considered only one scenario that could result in workers being exposed to airborne virus – thedropping of samples. Its solution: lab workers “will be trained to stop breathing”.
Bird flu vaccination could lead to new strains* 19:00 24 March 2004 by Debora MacKenzie
Vaccinating chickens may be the only way out of the bird flu nightmare in Asia. But it could also
lead to the evolution of new strains, the latest research shows, increasing the risk of a humanpandemic.
Only intensive surveillance can stop this happening, but experts say the countries affected do nothave the necessary systems in place.
Last week China declared its bird flu outbreaks had ended. Health officials are vaccinating
millions of the birds that escaped slaughter. Indonesia is also vaccinating, and other Asian
countries hit by the H5N1 bird flu are considering the same strategy.
But the H5N1 virus is almost certainly still circulating among the vaccinated birds, and the fear isthat in this abnormal setting it may evolve into a form that is not only fatal to people, like thecurrent one, but can also spread from person to person.

XVIII. Precedents: the abandoned swine flu mass vaccination program of 1976

In 1976, a mild swine flu swept through the United States. President Gerald Ford mandated amass vaccination programme -- which was carried out by the same vaccine companies as today -that had to be abandoned because of the catastrophic results.
President Ford was acting on the advice of medical experts, who believed they were dealing witha virus potentially as deadly as the one that caused the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic.
The virus surfaced in February 1976 at Fort Dix, New Jersey, where 19-year-old soldier, Pvt.
David Lewis, told his drill instructor that he felt tired and weak, although not sick enough to skipa training hike. Lewis was dead with 24 hours.
The autopsy revealed that Lewis had been killed by "swine flu," an influenza virus originating in
pigs. By then several other soldiers had been hospitalized with symptoms. Government doctors

80
became alarmed when they discovered that at least 500 soldiers on the base were infected without
becoming ill.
The incident recalled 1918, when infected soldiers returning from the trenches of World War I
triggered a contagion that spread quickly around the world, killing at least 20 million people. The
nation's health officials urged Ford to authorize a mass inoculation program aimed at reaching
every man, woman and child.
Mass vaccinations started in October, but within weeks reports started coming in of people
developing Guillain-Barré syndrome, a paralyzing nerve disease, right after taking the shot.
Within two months, 500 people were affected, and more than 30 died. Amid a rising uproar andgrowing public reluctance to risk the shot, federal officials abruptly canceled the program Dec. 16.
In the end, 40 million Americans were inoculated, and there was no epidemic. A later, more
technically advanced examination of the virus revealed that it was nowhere near as deadly as the1918 influenza virus. The only recorded fatality from swine flu itself was the unfortunate Pvt.
Lewis.
Healthy men, women and children went to receive the untested swine flu injection and died as aresult of the injection. Others received permanent injuries.
The programme was stopped. An Australian doctor, Archie Kalokerinos, gave his account of his
involvement in the 1976 swine flu pandemic:„In 1976 I was working in the far north of Australia amongst Aborigines. I observed, in one
community of only a few hundred people, when they were given the flu vaccine (probably theVictorian strain but this detail does not really matter because nobody outside a few selectedindividuals really knows what is in any particular batch), six men died suddenly soon afterwards.
They were not all 'old’. One was in his early twenties. A few weeks later, in another community I
found that individuals with heart or potential heart problems or diabetes were particularly likely todrop dead soon after being given the vaccine.
Obviously, there was a problem with some batches of the flu vaccine.
A few months later I was in America. President Ford had been told by his health advisers that
there was going to be a huge epidemic of ‘swine flu’, that this could kill may thousands and theonly way to prevent this catastrophe was to vaccinate the entire population of America – every
man woman and child - with a specific vaccine.
So the vaccine was manufactured and the biggest vaccination campaign in history was begun. I
was concerned because the vaccine could not be properly tested in a short period. None of therecipients would know anything about what they were being injected with and the chances werethat many would die suddenly. Furthermore, it was extremely unlikely that an epidemic of swine
flu would occur. So I spoke out. At first the newspapers got hold of what I said and headlined,‘Australian Physician Call It Mass Murder’. Then I appeared on Kathy Crosby’s television
program.
Watching that was a man in New York who did not like a gentleman named Gambino the Mafia
boss. Gambino was about 70 years old and had a history of heart problems. It was a simple matterto get someone to persuade Gambino to have the flu shot and Gambino obliged by dropping dead.
The newspapers got it right when they stated, ‘Mafia Flu Jab Conspiracy’.
People were dropping dead in the buildings where they received their shots. Others became

81paralyzed. The whole program ground to a halt.
President Ford decided to settle the matter quickly. In front of the whole world, on television, herolled up his sleeve and ‘had his shot’. I claimed at the time that he was given a ‘dud’ shot and I
am certain that this was actually done. Then President Ford invited all the news media men andwomen who were milling around to line up and have their shots. Only one man volunteered andhe happened to be the White House press secretary. All the others refused the invitation.
There was not a single case of swine flu. There never was going to be an epidemic of swine flu.
How was it that the world’s most powerful man with the world's greatest department of health got
it all so wrong? No one really knows the answer but what ever it is it is certainly not clean andtidy.
Furthermore, as far as I know I was the only practicing doctor who spoke out against it andwarned about almost certain consequences. How was it that a doctor with only basic qualifications
and not even the possessor of American citizenship stood out alone? There was at least one
researcher, Anthony Morris, who did try to speak out but he was at the time censored andcensored very hard.
This, therefore, is a classical example of how only one man got it right and everyone else got it
wrong. This is an important consideration because, when the subject of vaccines is discussed thefact that the vast bulk of the medical establishment states that something is so it is not, in reality,
necessarily so. If the establishment can get something so vast and important as the swine fiu
vaccine campaign so wrong then it is logical to reason that they could also get a lot of other things
wrong. At least it gives reasons to doubt what the establishment claims to be fact. If doctors andmembers of the general public considered this fewer errors would be made and fewer individuals
would suffer unnecessarily.
http://webpages.netlink.co.nz/~ias/swine.htm“Claims of over $1.3 billion came from victims of the vaccine that caused severe paralysis,
Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and death of 25.

XIX Inadequate performance of the government in stopping the spread of the swine flu as coverfor spreading a pandemic

The necessity for a mandatory vaccine or multiple mandatory vaccines could have been avoided
by early curtailment of the virus' spread says an expert. Hong Kong virologist and SARS expert Yi
Guan says the World Health Organization erred in not responding fast enough to the outbreak andthus contributed to more cases being spread rapidly. The fact that the borders were not closed andairplane flights were not halted into Mexico or departing from Mexico furthered the spread of theswine flu. (Stone, SARS Sleuth Tracks Swine Flu, Attacks WHO, 2009)http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/504/1?etoc
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC called on the Obama administration April 27 to
immediately close the southern border to Mexico and restrict all inbound air and ground traffic
from Mexico to emergencies and product delivery to protect American lives from the Mexican
Swine Flu outbreak., but the borders were left open.

82
Conservative Caucus and Judicial Watch have uncovered evidence of a Canada/US/Mexico policy
to leave Borders Open during Pandemics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9q9MSVYWLtA
In addition, the Department of Homeland Security would not allow Border Guards to wear
protective masks to protect themselves and their families from further outbreaks. Only
intervention from Congressmen Bilbray (R-CA) and Burgess (R-TX) had Border Guards were
finally allowed to wear masks. denials by DHS that it hadn't prohibited mask wear by Border
Guards.
The "Model State Emergency Heath Powers Act" allows the Government to seize and orquarantine a town and all the people within it.
But why does the government decide on such drastic measures when it comes to towns and cities
while allowing the borders to remain open?
Futhermore, the CDC has set up quarantine facilites at 19 airports. Passengers, presumably
without guns, will be taken to quarantine facilities when they step off the plane.
One report states that the sum of 15,000 dollars has been calculated to keep 200 people
quarantined for a month. That works out at 75 dollars per person for a month. This is a sum thatmight cover the costs of a lethal injection and a plastic FEMA coffin and/or transport to an
incinerator by rail. No adult can be kept for 75 dollars a month in any facility in the USA in good
health.
„MIA may be a quarantine site in pandemic
In the event of a pandemic, flights would be rerouted to Miami International Airport and 18 othermajor U.S. airports, according to plans by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
BY MICHAEL TURNBELL AND SCOTT POWERSSun Sentinel
As the swine flu scare fades, Miami International Airport and 18 other major American airports
have been lined up to handle a future pandemic that could require them to quarantine international
flights.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has set up stand-by quarantine/screening
facilities at the 19 airports to which all flights from affected countries would be diverted.
a quarantine of up to 200 people could cost $15,000 a month, with costs of an actual quarantine
running into the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
That works out at about 75 dollars per person for a month! Howis this possible?
Thi sis budget you die on not live on

http://www.miamiherald.com/business/story/1089929.html----------------------------------------------http://waronyou.com/forums/index.php?action=printpage;topic=9944.0________________________________________
Title: Swine Flu Vaccination Poses Serious Threat to Your Health
Post by: Raven on June 16, 2009, 10:58:31 PM________________________________________
http://euro-med.dk/?p=9152&print=1 (http://euro-med.dk/?p=9152&print=1)

83
Swine Flu Vaccination Poses Serious Threat to Your Health
Posted By Anders On June 15, 2009 @ 00:16 In English, Euromed | 6 Comments
No one can expect the government to hold the citizens of the nation to a higher standard than itholds itself, and yet that is exactly what the current administration is doing.
When individuals take precautionary measures and their government does not - i.e. closing theborders, etc. - forced innoculations in the face of open borders and unrestricted air travel fly in theface of reason.
Quarantining towns and cities and injecting someone without consent must be viewed as a moreservere response than a simple restriction of international or interstate travel.
Injection of an untested substance into one's body, without consent, is a violation of the sanctity oflife upon which all of our laws are based, and in mechanics and effect, is tantamount to rape.
Were it not the government performing such a mass, forced inocculation then the perpetrator
would surely face assault charges, if not for unlawful imprisonment, abduction, and mutilationand possibly even murder or mass murder.

In addition, Army criminal investigators are looking into the possibility that disease samples are
missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick -- the same Army research lab from which the 2001 anthrax
strain was released, according to a recent article in the Fredrick News Post.13 In February, the top
biodefense lab halted all its research into Ebola, anthrax, plague, and other diseases known as"select agents," after they discovered virus samples that weren't listed in its inventory and might
have been switched with something else.
According to a report in the Washington Post, there will be no investigation.
“An inventory of potentially deadly pathogens at Fort Detrick’s infectious disease laboratory
found more than 9,000 vials that had not been accounted for, Army officials said yesterday,
raising concerns that officials wouldn’t know whether dangerous toxins were missing.
After four months of searching about 335 freezers and refrigerators at the U.S. Army Medical
Research Institute of Infectious Diseases in Frederick, investigators found 9,220 samples thathadn’t been included in a database of about 66,000 items listed as of February, said Col. Mark
Kortepeter, the institute’s deputy commander.
The vials contained some dangerous pathogens, among them the Ebola virus, anthrax bacteria andbotulinum toxin, and less lethal agents such as Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus and thebacterium that causes tularemia. Most of them, forgotten inside freezer drawers, hadn’t been usedin years or even decades. Officials said some serum samples from hemorrhagic fever patients
dated to the Korean War.
Kortepeter likened the inventory to cleaning out the attic and said he knew of no plans for aninvestigation into how the vials had been left out of the database. “The vast majority of thesesamples were working stock that were accumulated over decades,” he said, left there by scientists
who had retired or left the institute.”

84
XX. Evidence as to manipulation of the legal framework to allow mass murder with impunity

President Obama and his predecessor President George Bush, have introduced legislation andexecutive orders that have stripped the civic rights of the people of the United States, specificallyby criminalising their right to refuse a “swine flu” or other pandemic virus vaccine, and so paved
the way for the implementation of a programme of mass murder by means of a virus and vaccine
while giving themselves and their agents immunity.
„The Project BioShield Act of 2004 (S. 15) became law on July 21, 2004 "to provide protections
and countermeasures against chemical, radiological, or nuclear agents that may be used in aterrorist attack against the United States by giving the National Institutes of Health contracting
flexibility, infrastructure improvements, and expediting the scientific peer review process, andstreamlining the Food and Drug Administration approval process of countermeasures."In other words, the FDA may now recklessly approve inadequately tested, potentially dangerous
vaccines and other drugs if ever the Secretaries of Health and Human Services (HHS) or Defense(DOD) declare a national emergency, whether or not one exists and regardless of whether
treatments available are safe and effective.
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act slipped under the radar when
George Bush signed it into law as part of the 2006 Defense Appropriations Act (HR 2863). It lets
the HHS Secretary declare any disease an epidemic or national emergency requiring mandatory
vaccinations. Nothing in the Act lists criteria that warrant a threat.
Also potential penalties aren't specified for those who balk, but very likely they'd include
quarantine and possible fines.
The HHS web site also says the Secretary may "issue a declaration....that provides immunity fromtort liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or
resulting from administration or use of (vaccine or other pharmaceutical) countermeasures todiseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or crediblerisk of a future public health emergency...."The industry-run US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notoriously rushes inadequately tested
drugs to market, putting their efficacy and safety into question, and turning those who use theminto lab rats. It includes everyone if a mass vaccination is ordered on the mere claim of a public
emergency - no proof required.
The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (S. 3678) is the other worrisome law, effective
December 19, 2006. It amended "the Public Health Service Act with respect to public healthsecurity and all-hazards preparedness and response, and for other purposes." Even its supporters
worry about issues of privacy, liability, and putting profits over public health. Critics express
greater concerns about dangerous remedies for exaggerated or non-existant threats as well as mass
hysteria created for political purposes.
The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA) has been criticised heavily.
On its web site, the ACLU says this about MSEHPA:
It's "written in a way that doesn't adequately protect citizens against the misuse of the tremendous
powers that it would grant in an emergency. (It's) replete with civil liberties problems. Its three
top flaws are that:

85(1) It fails to include basic checks and balances (by) grant(ing) extraordinary emergency powers(that) should never go unchecked. (It) could have serious consequences for individuals' freedom,
privacy, and equality."(2) "It goes well beyond bioterrorism (with) an overbroad definition of 'public health emergency"that may be anything a local or national authority declares for any reason with no conclusive
evidence for proof.
(3) "It lacks privacy protections (and) undercut(s) existing protections for sensitive medical
information."
MSEHPA worries other organizations besides the ACLU, both conservative and progressive including the Free Congress Foundation, American Legislative Exchange Council, conservative
association of state legislators, Human Rights Campaign, and Health Privacy Project.
The Real Threat of Dangerous, Mandatory Vaccinations
In the wake of the hyped Swine Flu scare, media reports suggest mass vaccinations are coming.
The May 6 Kimberly Kindy - Ceci Connolly Washington Post one, for example, headlined "US
May Add Shots for Swine Flu to Fall Regimen" without saying they'll be mandatory but reading
between the lines suggests the possibility this year or later.
Any Federal or State laws that allow the government under any authority, including a presidential
executive order, to compel the people of United States of America to take a vaccination for which
there is verifiable scientific evidence for believing could be very dangerous to them, bothindividually and collectively, and which, also includes provisions, barring them from claiming any
compensation for any injury or death while enforcing punishments so severe for refusing that it
could cost people lives or result in imprisonment, are in violation of the Preamble, theConstitution and the Bill of Rights and the Laws of the land.
To accept the legal framework of the Patriot Act 1, and 2, The Model State Emergency HealthPowers Act, the NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and
HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20 is to accept that the legal
rights of the US citizen today in 2009 are no different from the prisoners of the Nazi German
concentration camps when it comes to their right to refuse an unproven vaccine forced on them byagents claiming the authority of an official office that was, however, also outside the scope of theduties and offices mandated by the German Constitution.
The prisoners in the Nazi concentration camps had no right under law to refuse a vaccine orexperimental drug just as the US citizens today have no right to refuse an unproven pandemic
vaccine today. Any refusal to allow a vaccination by Nazi concentration camp inmates was met
with severe punishment including shooting, beatings, and solitary confinement. And any refusal
by US citizens today will be met by the same severe punishment including shooting andimprisonment because the government agents administrating the vaccines are authorised to use
these punishments against criminals, and those who refuse the vaccination are classified as
criminals.
Nazi concentration camp prisoners were barred from seeking compensation or any form of legal
redress for any injuries and damages done to them by forced vaccination – if they survived, at all,and most did not. And the citizens of the United States of America are also to be barred fromseeking compensation or any form of legal redress for any harm, including death, inflicted onthem by the vaccinations.
The Nazi doctors who forced prisoners to take experimental substances -- under contract often
from pharmaceutical companies such as Bayer -- were condemned for their crimes by the US
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg. In response to this barbarism, a new code of medical ethics was
drawn up called the Nuremberg Code, which emphasises the importance of obtaining theindividual consent and also adequate information before any vaccination is administered or any
medical experiment performed.

86

The Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights which are the law of the land, and from which all
government bodies derive their authority, make it clear that the citizens of the United States cannever legally and constitutionally be stripped of all their rights in the same way that the Nazi
prisoners of war were by any legislation or any Presidential executive order waiver, and they cannever be forced to take an unproven vaccine under punishment of being shot or imprisoned as
criminals and have their their right to compensation abolished by the government in advancewithout their consent.
Articles IV and VIII of the Amendments are two of the articles that give the people of the UnitedStates the legal right to refuse a vaccination or any medical experiment to be inflicted on theirbodies by force.
Article IV. 'The right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonablesearches and seizures shall not be violated."
This Article makes it clear that provisions in the state and federal health emergency acts to
go into houses and seize property if people refuse to accept an unproven vaccine areillegal.
Article VIII. "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fine's imposed, nor crueland unusual punishments inflicted."
Article VIII makes it clear that “cruel and unusual punishments” cannot be inflicted on the
citizens of United States, but that all punishments need to be in proportion to the offence.
The punishments envisaged for refusing a vaccine are not in proportion to the offence.
Isn’t shooting someone or imprisoning them as a criminal, as the federal government claims theright to do under its draconian emergency health powers, because they refuse to take a dangerous
vaccine a cruel and unusual punishment, and therefore an extreme and flagrant violation of Article
VIII?
Isn’t putting someone in a “FEMA” camp for quarantine, that is to say, imprisoning them without
right to a jury, just for refusing to have an unproven vaccine injected into their body without theirconsent an “excessive” and disproportionate punishment?
Isn’t abolishing the right of people to claim any compensation for any injury or damage inflictedon them by vaccination with an unproven substance a “cruel and unusual punishment?”
Again, it is clear from the Constitution that the government is prohibited from inflicting excessive
and unreasonable punishments possible under criminal law and also military law for an action thatis a right of every citizen of the United States of America, namely the right to refuse to allow an
unknown, potentially lethal substance, to be injected into their body, and any “immunity” that the
government confers upon itself as it commits these acts is an illegal and unconstitutional“immunity”.
It is legally unconstitutional for the government to treat its citizens, free men, women and children
and members of a free state, with rights and dignities that cannot be invaded, as "slaves," and“prisoners” to be subjected to military despotism or arbitrary medical dictates and compelled totake a vaccination on pain of death without recourse to the courts of law or compensation if they
are injured as a result of this compulsory vaccination giving them the same legal status as theprisoners of the Nazi concentration camp, that is to say, no legal status and no legal rights.

87

The Nazi concentration camp doctor could force any vaccine into the helpless prisoner without
being required to ask for the prisoner’s permission, but the Constitution of the United Statesprohibits doctors, nurses or other personal from injecting into citizens an untested substance byforce and without full approval and consent of the patient.
The US Military Tribunal condemned the Nazi doctors at the Doctor’s Trial at Nuremberg of 1946
- 1947.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/NurembergDoctorTrial.html
In the Nazi concentration camps, prisoners were forced to allow camp personnel perform any
operation they wished on their bodies, often barbaric operations, barbaric experiments with drugs
and untested substances that resulted in the death in agony of those prisoners, often over a periodof days or weeks.
But the United States citizen cannot be treated in the same way as a prisoner in a Nazi
concentration camp and subjected to the same compulsory vaccinations by medical or military
personnel because of the "unalienable" "retained" and "reserved" rights possessed by the People
under the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights, Laws and Statues of the land.
In Nazi Germany, doctors who refused to go along with the dictates of the totalitarian bureaucratic
Nazi state were punished and had their licenses. But doctors who are citizens of the United Statescannot legally and constitutionally be forced to go along with dangerous medical experiments on
the entire population by threats of having their licence removed.
The rights of all citizens cannot be legally invaded or denied by any Government, and so it follows, that mandatory vaccination is always and without exception illegal, unconstitutional, andshould be absolutely banned by any court in the US whose judges are themselves not guilty ofabusing their office by upholding illegal laws.
Not only the Nazi German doctors, but also the Nazi German judges themselves were put on trial
at Nuremberg for allowing German citizens in spite of the Constitution of the German Republic,
which assigned solid civic rights to all citizens, to be systematically stripped of those rights.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/alstoetter.htm
That judges stretch the Constitution and laws to the point where they allow any crime and who
have been involved in crimes against humanity perpetrated by “government agencies” and the
medical establishment are not immune from prosecution is shown by the judgements of the
Nuremberg Trial of 1947.
Flowing from the judgements against Nazi German functionaries involved in forced vaccinations
handed down at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials, it follows that personnel belonging togovernment bodies, courts and private companies that force the US people to undergo massvaccination with an unproven substance under threat of being punished as criminals if they do not,and even shot under provisions of criminal law, should be made, both collectively andindividually, liable not just for paying damages for those harmed by the vaccine as was the case in
1976 when substantial damages were paid out to victims of the government-mandated swine flu
vaccine programme, but also for charges of conspiracy to mass murder.
To sanction the narrowing down of the choice of a citizen of the United States, endowed with anextremely wide horizon in which to exercise their free will thanks to the provisions of thePreamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights, to only two options, namely the alternative of taking adangerous, possibly lethal vaccine, or of being shot or imprisoned as a criminal, is, in effect, to88sanction the murder of that individual. For if a person cannot choose except between death by adangerous vaccine or death by a bullet, then the life of that person is being directly threatened byan outside agent and there is way out for them except death. That person cannot resist a dangerous
vaccine by law and they cannot resist it by force.
If a government can so violate the basic freedoms of citizens of the United States as to force themto take an untested vaccine for a “swine flu” or other pandemic, then it can force them to do
anything, such as, for example, not to drive a car, an activity which has been proven to be far
more dangerous to people’s health than the swine flu, which has killed relatively few people so far
in the USA.
On this logic, a government can force a mandatory reading program on its citizens on the grounds
that this is good for the well being of the individual and the country, and shot or imprison anyone
who does not participate without any right to compensation.
The right of the citizens of the United States to refuse a vaccination flows from the second articleof the Declaration state that "all men" are endowed by their Creator with "certain" "unalienable
rights" among which are "life" "liberty" and the "pursuit of happiness."
To force the people of America to take a dangerous vaccine which has a high possibility of
causing death and injury and so robbing them of their “life”, “liberty” and “pursuit of happiness”
is to violate their unalienable right to life, safety, liberty and happiness of the individual.
The right to "life" of course is stated first among all the rights granted by the Constitution to a
citizen of the United States of America because without life is the prerequisite of all otheractivities; and the right to "liberty" is stated second, because without reasonable scope to exercise
our freedom to pursue our ideas of happiness in our own way, without infringing on the liberty or
happiness of others, we enjoy a merely nominal notion of liberty that is useless and meaningless.
The right to freedom from dangerous vaccines and other biological agents is directly covered by
the “right to life”, and is, therefore, an “unalienable right” of every American citizen today as
yesterday that no government can invade.
The government’s mandatory “swine flu” vaccine programme is, therefore, not only illegal andunconstitutional, but it is also contrary to accepted norms of medical ethics, which reinforce theright of a patient to decide what operation is or is not to be performed on his own body and blood,
including what vaccination to accept.
The President has no legal or constitutional right to issue decrees, executive orders or waivers that
grant him or any other body, national or international, such as the United Nations or WHO, theright to abolish, limit or infringe on the civic rights of the citizens of the United States of America
anchored in the Constitutional Charters of the United States.
The Constitution and Bill of Rights judge any President who acts in this way, to be acting
illegally, for he is acting in opposition to the very body of laws from which he derives his own
authority. Presidential authority has no authority whatsoever when it authorises flagrant violationof the Constitution from which that president derives authority in the first place.
As the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights makes clear, the people of United States ofAmerica are endowed originally and inherently with all necessary or unalienable rights for life,
liberty and happiness, and their government exists simply or chiefly for the purpose of protecting
and enforcing these rights. The government cannot grant or deny its citizens rights, which exist
inalienably in the people themselves.

89
No President, no government has the authority to deny the citizens of the United States any of
their constitutional rights.
Articles IX and X state:"The enumeration in the constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny ordisparage others retained by the people.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
These Articles underline that the people of the United States are acknowledged to have specific"certain" "unalienable" "reserved" and "retained" rights, and that these rights are divinely
conferred and naturally inherent and, therefore, cannot be restricted, limited or infringed upon by
any government, in any way, but must be respected, protected and enforced by all governments,
and that governments exist for the chief purpose of defending and enforcing these rights.
The most basic, essential and obvious right is the right of American people to choose what
happens to their own bodies and which treatments or vaccinations to accept and under what
conditions, that is to say, the right to “life.”
Because the people of the United States of America have the right to decide what vaccination is
injected into their bodies as part of their “right to life” and “liberty”, they can never be legallyforced to accept an injection of an unproven substance under threat of a drastic punishment suchas being shot as a criminal suspect, and without any recourse to compensation or any right to legal
redress.
It follows from the above that any government personnel, police, military, doctors or nurses whoare participating in such a forced mass vaccination programme are acting illegally andunconstitutionally and without exception, in every single case, with every single vaccination,
violating the most fundamental and inalienable rights of the people of the United States.
The Declaration of Independence states that the right of the American people to “life” is“unalienable”, creating a rock-like legal basis for the right to refuse any vaccination.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they areendowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life,
Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are
instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That
whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of
the People to alter or to abolish it."
The rights of Americans are expanded on under THE FIVE ARTICLES OF THE
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS, JULY 4, 1776.

First: All men are created equal.
Second: All men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, among
which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Third: Governments are instituted among men to secure these unalienable rights.
Fourth : Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.
Fifth : Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the rightof the people to alter or to abolish it.

90
The Declaration states that there are "Natural" and "Divine" rights that human beings are endowed
with, and that these exist before any human laws, charters or constitutions were ever written.
These rights antedate, and therefore takes precedence over State and National laws andConstitutions, which, to be valid, must be based on the fundamental principles of inherent humanand natural rights which are naturally and divinely and equally conferred upon all human kind.
The official title of this document is "The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States ofAmerica," which shows that it is the official statement or code of the foundation governing
principles of the New Nation issued by its first Congress and has, therefore, the full effect of a"Constitution," "Pre-Constitution" or "Bill of Rights."
It follows that no government, no president, in spite of any self proclaimed “state emergency” – a“state of emergency” was also the pretext that the Nazis and Nazi Judges used to destroy theGerman Constitution -- or any war on terrorism or disease can ever introduce regulations or lawsthat override these basic rights to life for they are anchored in foundation of the country itself, in
the Constitution and its democratic code.
The implementation of emergency health powers and martial law will mean will mean thedestruction of the Constitution and is therefore always, without exception illegal andunconstitutional.
The courts of the United States have handed down clear judgements against forced vaccinations.
In 2004, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued a temporary injunction, saying thePentagon’s compulsory vaccination of military personnel against anthrax was illegal.
Until proven otherwise by the Food and Drug Administration, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G.
Sullivan in his 34-page decision agreed with the contention of unidentified active duty National
Guard and civilian defense employees that Anthrax Vaccine Absorbed was an unlicensed,
investigative drug and being used for an unapproved purpose.
So concerned was Congress about the impact of vaccines that it passed a law amid fears that theuse of such drugs may have led to unexplained illnesses among veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf
War, which have come to be known as Gulf War Syndrome.
The judgements against vaccinations go back for decades. In 1894 Judge Bartlett, of the New
York Supreme Court, in the case of Walters, decided that:"To vaccinate a person against his will, without legal authority so to do, would be an
assault."
So, to force someone to take a vaccine against their will is itself an assault or a criminal
offence under this interpretation. If the person who is forced to take the vaccine then dies,
it flows that not an assault but a murder has been committed. And when a murder has beencommitted, the US Justice system requires the perpetrators to be brought to justice even if
they are government officials or government personnel.
Judge Gaynor also of the New York Supreme Court and also in the same year, 1894, in the case ofSmith against Health Commissioner Emery of Brooklyn issued a ruling later confirmed by the
New York Court of Appeals:"If the Commissioner [of Health] had the power to imprison an individual for refusing tosubmit to vaccination, I see no reason why he should not also imprison one for refusing toswallow a dose. But the Legislature has conferred no such power upon him, if, indeed, it

91
has the power to do the like. ... If the Legislature desired to make vaccination compulsory
it would have so enacted. Whether it be within its power to do so, and if so, by whatmeans it may enforce such an enactment, are not for discussion here."

XVIII. Constitutional issues: the legality v. Illegality of jeopardising the Life, health and “publicgood” by mass vaccinations

Flowing from the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights, the purpose of the implementation of
any Federal or State government swine flu or any other mass vaccination or medical programme
has to be to promote and safeguard the Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness including property
and health of people of the United States of America.
There is, therefore, an absolute requirement for any vaccination’s beneficial effects for the peopleof the United States of America as a whole, not just individually but also collectively, to be provenaccording to generally accepted scientific principles be based on thorough tests and trials anddocumented in scientific literature and other sources of information.
The US government is legally and constitutionally obliged to be dedicated to the fulfilment of
the duty to implement only those public health or vaccination programmes using appropriate
policy and regulatory frameworks that are proven to be in the best interests of the health of thepeople of United States of America by the THE FIVE ARTICLES OF THE DECLARATION OF
RIGHTS, JULY 4, 1776.
The Charters of the United State Constitution say that the government derives its power from thePeople and must exercise its authority only for measures that contribute to the Life, Liberty andPursuit of Happiness the people, and cannot grant itself “immunity” by a special decree thatexempts it from the duties for whose specific purpose it was founded in the first place.
Furthermore, the Preamble to the Constitution binds the government to ensure any activity or
programme, including a vaccine programme, yields fruitful results in terms of Life, Liberty andPursuit of Happiness for the People and with minimal risks and burdens, with the words, “We thePeople of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure
domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure
the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution
for the United States of America.““The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory statement of thefundamental purposes and guiding principles which the Constitution is meant to serve. It
expresses in general terms the intentions of its authors, is sometimes referred to by courts asreliable evidence of what the Founding Fathers thought the Constitution meant and what they
hoped it would achieve,”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The Preamble makes it clear what the ultimate and overriding purpose or goals -- the telos using
a term of Aristoteles -- of the application and interpretation of Constitution, the Rules andStatues and also the Government are, namely, “to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings ofLiberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the UnitedStates of America.“

92
While the Preamble is not the Law of the Land, it has a binding character of a Law in as far as it
sets a clear direction, goal or objective to which activities of the constituent legal andgovernmental bodies, including the public health bodies of the United States when implementing
vaccine programmes, must align themselves in order to have any legitimate authority whatsoeverin the first place.
All the articles and amendments, laws and statutes must be read in conjunction with theconstitution’s Preamble, which sets forth a normative structure in which the „general welfare“,„justice“, „liberty“ and domestic democracy have an inseparable relationship for „Posterity“. The
Preamble’s normative meaning is given tangible form by the provisions in the Constitution and
the Bill of Rights.
The Preamble, Constitution and Law or Code or Statues are inextricably and logically connected.
The Preamble is the authority for the Constitution. For anything to have Force and Effect it musthave authority. Rules are similar to Regulations, which is how the Law or Code or Statutes areinterpreted and enforced. The Code is the Authority for the Rules. The Constitution is the
Authority for the Code. The Preamble is the Authority for the Constitution. That means that thePreamble is the ultimate authority for the Constitution, the Code, the Rules or Statutes.
The Preamble can never, not in for Posterity, under any circumstances be detached from theConstitution and the government and its agencies cannot ever be detached from the Constitution
and Preamble. This is because the causality between the Preamble, Constitution and Rules
involves a logical and not a contingent necessity.
The philosopher David Hume in his A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740) showed that the
only necessity that links cause and effect is the logical necessity of a demonstrative argument.
By contrast, when a sequence of events is observed in the physical world that is consideredcausal -- for example, an apple falling down from a tree onto the ground -- these are only
impressions of the apple, its motion and its collision, but there is no logical necessity by which
the cause brings about the effect. There might be an occasion when the apple does not fall
downwards but upwards. We have observed apples falling to the ground every single time but
there is no logical necessity for them to fall to the ground every single time.
There is, however, a logical necessity that two plus two always equals four and that logicalnecessity resides in the ideas of two and two and in the idea of addition of numbers.
Two plus two can never logically equal three.
Hume established that there was no argument for linking causes and effects in terms of powers,
active forces, and so on but that the only causal necessity was a logical one such as foundinherent in the concepts of mathematics and language.
Because the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights are artefacts of language and the words
have logical relationships between each other that involve the idea of a necessary connection, thecausal links between them cannot logically be broken apart.
The Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights have the same logical relationship between themas two plus two plus two equals six.
A whole can be divided into various parts just as an apple pie can be divided into slices. The
Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights form one whole but can also be divided into parts forthe sake of ease of use by persons seeking to apply the law to specific and concrete
circumstances. Nevertheless, the meaning of any law is not contained in one isolated word or93
paragraphs but in conjunction with the other parts and the overriding intention expressed in thePreamble, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, is the ultimate framework or vector forinterpreting all the other laws.
Those goals that are in conflict with the goals laid down in the Preamble are, therefore, a priori
logically and necessarily without any legal force in US law and government.
That laws when detached from a Constitution and normative justice can be administered in a
way that is unjust is shown by the developments in Nazi Germany when legal manoeuvres werecarried out to obstruct and destroy the basic purpose and provisions of the German Constitution,
manoeuvres including the privatisation or corporatisation of German government functions,putting them into a „legal void“, referencing not the Constitution or normative justice, but the“performance targets” of their „corporate owners.“
That it was illegal and unconstitutional for the Nazis to use the manoeuvre of corporatising
government functions and replacing laws with regulations is underlined by the judgements of the
US Military Tribunal at Nuremberg.
Under the Federal Register Act of 1935, an attempt was made to detach the operation of
government agencies from the goals laid out in the Preamble, Constitution and Code, binding byvirtue of the logical necessity inherent in the ideas expressed in these Charters on all government
activities, by assigning to those government functions the status of private corporations, and in a
way that the constitutional mandates and goals of the Preamble did not attach to them.
As a result, corporations under private law were created that appeared to be able to operated
outside the Preamble and Constitution and Bill of Rights on a technicality.
In this way, members of the international crime syndicate, who have annexed high ogvernment
office, were able to carry out their criminal plans under color of their office more easily.
The people working for the agencies were given the status of private sector employees and wereno longer public officers with an Office bound to the Preamble and Constitution.
They were employed under contracts of corporate law that made no reference to the Preamble
and Constitution, from which they derived their entire authority from in the first place.
They were given the status of simple mercenaries with some of them armed and some of themunarmed, who worked for money and were required to perform certain duties laid down by theiremployers by and through "cooperative agreements", "performance of services contracts","grants", "memorandums of understanding", "incentive programs" and on and on which arecontrolled by the Federal government.
However, the privatisation or corporatisation of the functions of government, including publichealth functions, is not logically and legally the same as the privatisation or corporatisation of
the ideas and Charters underlying a government and its functions. The Preamble andConstitution remain the ultimate authority over these agencies because they are the original andsole cause or authority of all government activities, including the activities of privatised publichealth government agencies.
The limits of privatizing government functions and detaching them from the Constitution andallowing them to operate as “corporations” with employees accountable to no one except to theiremployer in a “law free” zone are shown by the Nuremberg Trials.

94
German government functions that were “privatised” or handed out to newly created corporatelike bodies charged with performing specific functions, for example, the Gestapo, charged withinternal surveillance, and the “SS Totenkopf Verbände”, or death squads, charged withadministrating the Nazi concentration camps, were still held accountable after the war for the“fruits” or “results” of their work.
A mere declaration by the “employees” of the SS and Gestapo that they were following orders
from their “employer”, and working with utmost efficiency to reach performance targets, such as
killing so and so many prisoners a day in the camps, was regarded as insufficient by the US
Military Tribunal to absolve them of their responsibility before the law of their crimes.
The Nuremberg Trial judgements show that no government can privatise an essential
government function in way that detaches from the activities of an agency from normative
justice, the law or principles of a Constitution Republic.
Moving a government function into an entirely “law-free” “corporate” economic zone where
the only dictates that apply are those of efficiency, targets and performance and contracts without
an reference to the ultimate “fruits” of those “efficient” activities is prohibited by law.
Murder is murder whether it is done efficiently by privatised government agencies or not.
Torture is torture whether it is done efficiently by privatised government agencies or not.
Infringements on liberty are infringements whether they are done efficiently by corporations ornot.
The regulations that these “corporations” produced to carry out their mass murder andsurveillance were deemed illegal.
Regulations are not the same as the law. That is the judgement of Nuremberg. Corporate
regulations do not confer authority and legitimacy. Only the Constitution and the Law confer
authority and legitimacy.
Presidential or Leader waivers and executive orders that gave an air of legitimacy to a criminal
system were deemed illegal at the Nuremberg Trials if they were not in alignement withnormative justice and the Constitution.
This, then, is the judgement of the Nuremberg Trials. No act of “privatisation” on the authorityof the government can abolish normative justice and the essential mandate of the Constitution
from which all government bodies derive their legitimacy. Privatised government agencies must,
therefore, also act within the terms of the Preamble and Constitution no matter and corporate
contracts cannot abolish this relationship.
Corporate contracts can only regulate the activities of the people working inside the corporation
but not the legal relationship between the corporation and normative justice and the Constitution.
For the President by use of decrees or the government to create government bodies that are in
total opposition to a Constitutional Republic where all people a right to Life, Liberty and Pursuitof Happiness including property is, therefore, illegal and unconstitutional.
Officials are always directly accountable back and though their Office to the Constitution, to thePeople by virtue of the obligations and legal relationships that flow from the Preamble,
Constitution and Bill of Rights that subordinate all other activities to these.

95
Federal Law and Regulations prohibit the use of investigational new drugs, including unprovenvaccines, without informed consent of recipients 51. 10 U.S.C. § 1107 (2000) provides thatinvestigational new drugs or drugs unapproved for their intended uses may not be given tomembers of the Armed Forces without their prior consent except in the case of a waiver by the
President of the United States. However, Presidential decrees are not mandated by the US
Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights with its democratic code.
Executive orders issued by Adolf Hitler, the de facto President of Nazi Germany (who won
democratic elections in 1933) of German citizen’s constitutional rights was not consideredadequate justification for violating those rights and the rules of normative justice by the US
Military Tribunal at the Nuremberg Trials.
Therefore, the various government agencies created by the Federal Act of 1935 also have to besubordinated to th central overriding purpose and goals of the Preamble and Constitution,
namely Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness, irrespective of any corporate contracts.
Essential government functions, including public health functions and mass vaccination
programmes, cannot be detached by an act of "privatisation" or “corporatisation” from thePreamble, Constitution and Law of the land and from the goals they mandate.
They cannot never legally and constitutionally be detached from or given a life independent of
the Preamble and Constitution and Law because this is the ultimate source of their authority inthe first place.
The public agencies in United States of America cannot be turned into an apparatus for killing
Americans by means of deliberately or accidentally contaminated and/or shoddily manufactured
vaccinations under any law for the enrichment of pharmaceutical companies, the banks that own
those companies or by any foreign powers that gain undue influence over the US government.
The abolition of the relationship between the Preamble and Constitution and the activities of thegovernment agencies under the Federal Act of 1935 is a legal fiction.
Any judge who attempts to interpret laws in a way that is not alignment with the overwhelming
intention of the Preamble, Constitution and the Bill of Rights, namely, to protect the Liberty,
Life, Happiness, including health and property of the people of America, and to hold thegovernment agencies, including the public health agencies, accountable for doing the same, hasfailed to understand the objective, logical necessity inherent in these documents.
As mentioned, there is a precedent for making judges accountable for failing to uphold theobjective necessity of normative justice of the Preamble and Constitution and for allowing atyrannical government to hollow out the rights of citizens. That precedent is in the Nazi German
Judges Trial conducted by US Military Tribunals at Nuremberg in 1947 when German judges
and lawyers were held to account for their wilful, sophistic and perverse interpretation of theGerman Constitution, which, like the US constitution, assigned civil rights to individuals andlimited the power of the government, thereby allowing the Nazi government to carry out the defacto abolition of all those civic rights and government limits with a veneer of legality.
The goals laid out in the Preamble are not law, but they still have the absolute and binding
character of a law, and that binding character extends to all courts and to all government
functions, privatised or not.
The Preamble requires that the Constitution and laws and goals of courts and government
agencies are always and without exception interpreted in such a way as to contribute to the goals
laid down in the Preamble, including the continuation of the Constitution in perpetuity, so

96eliminating sophistry, which can be used to justify the opposite of the logical necessity inherent
in the law by playing with words and semantics or taking elements of the law out of theircontext.
The US Constitution also mandated a tripartite government, a separation of powers, and thesevarious powers cannot be combined altogether into the Administrative State, i.e. fourth branch,by an act of legislation, which detaches the Administrative States from the Preamble andConstitution by virtue of logical necessity.
The courts in the Administrative State cannot force out the Constitutional Courts and replacethem with the other "jurisdictions" such as Administrative, Equity, Maritime and so on.
They are the custard on the apple pie of the Preamble, Constitution and Statutes, to use a
metaphor. The custard goes on top of the apple pie. It is not served instead of the apple pie. If
you go to a diner and ask for apple pie and get only custard, the diner owners would be judged inbreach of duty.
The existence of the various branches of Administrative law, such as Equity and Maritime law,cannot be used as an excuse to serve the American people custard when they have asked for, and,more importantly, when they have the legal and constitutional right to, apple pie.
The courts and government agencies derive their authority solely from the contribution they
make towards creating a balanced, just and equitable society, that is to say solely from thePreamble and Constitution and Statues, and their adherence to the normative justice and endgoals or telos formalised in these documents.
Administrative courts were also at work in Germany during the totalitarian Nazi rule after theGerman Constitutional Courts were neutralised by the Dictator Adolf Hitler and his Nazi judges.
However, the mere functioning of the Administrative State churning out masses of regulations tocreate a totalitarian bureaucracy that disguised the total lawlessness during the entire existence of
the Nazi rule was not enough for Nazi Germany to be spared the judgement of being a criminal
state by the US Military Tribunal at Nuremberg.
“For the good of the State”, the Nazi legal precept, was not considered to be the same as “For thegood of the People.”That the State itself can be found to be criminal is underlined by the judgement of the
Nuremberg Trials. Government bodies that subordinate their functions to a state found to be
acting criminal are also to be classified as part of that criminal enterprise.
The People and precepts of normative justice that serve the People must always remain primary
under the Constitution, according to the judgement of the Nuremberg Trial.
A judge who in a wilful interpretation of the laws fights the interests of the pharmaceuticalindustry or the banking industry in some corner of Administrative law at the expense of theConstitution, the Preamble and the People, from which that judge alone derives any legitimate
authority, for whatever reason a judge might be so inclined, is also a priori exercising his officeillegally and unconstitutionally.
Even assuming the primacy of Administrative law over the Preamble and Constitution, a mass
“swine flu” or other pandemic flu vaccination programme would still be illegal.
To reframe the argument for a mass swine flu vaccination in terms of equity law, for example, amass flu vaccine programme must leave the American people in credit when it comes to their

97
health, happiness and life in spite of the government asking them for a debit in terms of requiringthem to take a vaccination and so accept a jab and a disease into their bloodstream.
By contrast, a vaccine programme that leaves the majority of people of America overwhelming
in deep debt, suffering a loss of health, life and property or in detention, and in a manner thatprohibits them from seeking a legal or financial redress in the form of compensation, that is,suffering a damage that is irreparable, is illegal, and the profit of a tiny group from this is illegal.
It follows therefore not only from the Preamble, the Constitution and Bill of Rights but also fromthe application of the principles of Equity law that no mass vaccination programme should be
conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or injury will occur on a scalethat far outweighs any benefits.
As part of their legal and binding obligation under the Preamble to ensure the health, justice andlife of the people of America, the US government is prohibited from taking a reckless gamble
with the very lives, health whose maintenance is the sole purpose and object of the Constitution
by forcing on the People a random, unnecessary and unknown drug.
In the judgement of Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), theplaintiff was forced to take a small pox vaccination because, it was argued, such a vaccine helped
to protect the whole community. A citizen has obligations to the state in which that citizen isembedded. Nevertheless, the protection of the whole was considered to be the legal justification
for forcing an individual to take the vaccine.
The Supreme Court examined the issue of whether involuntary vaccination violated Jacobson's"'inherent right of every freeman to care for his own body and health in such way as seems to him
best . . . " The Court bifurcated this question, first considering the right of the state to invade
Jacobson's person by forcing him to submit to vaccination:
This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that "persons and property
are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens, in order to secure the general comfort, health,and prosperity of the State; of the perfect right of the legislature to do which no question ever was,or upon acknowledged general principles ever can be made, so far as natural persons areconcerned."' (at 26)
With this language, the Court stated the basic bargain of civilization: an individual must give up
some personal freedom in exchange for the benefits of being in a civilized society. Jacobsonsought to enjoy the benefit of his neighbors being vaccinated for smallpox without personallyaccepting the risks inherent in vaccination. The Court rejected Jacobson's claim, which it viewed
as an attempt to be a free-rider on society. „However, scientific advances have shown that vaccination itself can actually increase thevirulence of a virus and so increase the danger to the community.
In view of all the evidence of adverse events from vaccinations recorded upon a mass of people
with a range of genetics, no court can nowadays argue that it is for the "public good" that people
are vaccination. The idea that there is a "herd immunity" has been proven to be without any
substance. Scientific advancement has shown that "herd immunity” is not only outdated but
actually false.
It was the act of mass vaccinations in 1918 that actually caused the deadly Spanish flu pandemic,
according to experts. [reference]

98
Therefore, the judgement of 1905 on vaccines based on outdated science cannot be the judgementof 2009. The courts must adjust to the new body of scientific evidence available and on the basisof this information, they are legally and constitutionally bound to make judgements to promote
the health and well being of the American people.

XXI. The issue of immunity and compensation as evidence of intent to commit a crime

The US government has passed legislation giving them immunity in the event of vaccinations
causing death or injury, specifically by barring people from seeking compensation.
Compensating patients who are harmed as a consequence of participation in a vaccination
programme is a well established principle of US law.
The US federal government currently has a programme that gives compensation to victims ofgovernment mandated vaccinations.
Victims of the 1976 government-mandated swine flu mass vaccination programme won more thana billion dollars in damages for the injuries they suffered as a result of vaccines.
Compensation is a mechanism by which the vaccine companies have an incentive to act in theinterests of the people, and not manufacture products that cut costs and are dangerous.
And yet this compensation is to be waived now under The Model State Emergency Health Powers
Act, the National Emergency Act, NATIONAL SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL
DIRECTIVE/NSPD 51 and HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE/HSPD-20.
So, just at the time when Americans are being asked to take upon themselves the greatest risk of a
vaccine not proven, or rather proven to have killed people in Poland, they will not be able to claim
compensation.
For the US government to force the people of America to sign away their right to compensation,individually and collectively, for a vaccine that is classified as a bioweapon by that same
government, and which they are being compelled to take at pain of death or imprisonment while
not adequately regulating the vaccine manufacturers in spite of lapse after lapse is illegal andunconstitutional.
For the government of the USA is not mandated by the Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights
to seek the Life, Liberty and Happiness of pharmaceutical companies and the banks that holdshares in vaccine companies by supplying them with a huge market of unwilling subjects to inject
whatever substances they chose into those people.
The government of the USA only has legitimate authority in as far as it serves the People of theUnited States and their Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Such a blanket enforced waiver is illegal and unconstitituional: only the invidivual can waive theirown right to compensation and only after being adequately informed and giving their consent.
The principle that the patient must always consent of their free will to a vaccination wasestablished at the Nuremberg Trials when Nazi German doctors were held to account for injecting
unknown substances into Nazi concentration camp inmates.

99
Just as Navy personnel are being forced to take vaccinations for human clinical trials for Vical, theconcentration camp inmates of Nazi Germany were given substances for testing by companies
like Bayer.
Members of the international crime syndicate, who have annexed high ogvernment office and whoare carrying out their criminal plans under color of their office, now want to abolish the right ofthe entire nation not only to refuse but also to claim any compensation if they are injured.
What will happen when people are given a vaccine similar in lethality to the one in Poland, butcannot claim any compensation?
When the US government forces the people of America to take an uknown vaccine for which they
are a priori banned from asking for compensation for death or injury, the government has moved
beyond equity or administrative law and into criminal law with the government acting criminally.
When an American is forced at gunpoint under criminal law to take a vaccination but are barredfrom any form of legal or financial redress if they are injured or killed, then they have the samerights as the Nazi concentration camp inmates, who were also forced to allow unknown
substances to be injected into their bloodstream at gunpoint and who were also barred fromseeking any from of redress whether in the form of financial compensation or before the law
courts because the Nazi government de facto waived their right to do so.
Furthermore, if the government absolishes the requirement to pay compensation to those injured
or killed as a result of a swine flu vaccination, then the government is telling the vaccine
companies it has a carte blanche to do what it wants. It doesn’t matter who dies or is injured as aresult of shoddy vaccines. The companies will never be held to account.
The burden of risk or debt has to be born entirely by the people while the credit or profts in theform of revenue from sales, higher share prices and better dividends acrrue solely to thepharmaceutical companies and the banks that hold stock.
By waiving the right of the people of America to claim any compensation and offering blanekt
immunity, companies have a financial incentive to sell as many vaccines as possible as
expensively as possible while producing them as cheaply as possible by cutting quality control
standards to maximise their companies.
Baxter, another key vaccine supplier, is currently facing lawsuits for adultering Helperin withcheaper ingredients to maximise profits resulting in death and injury.
If this is the way, Baxter is behaving when it can still be sued for killing and injuring people byputting in cheap and unapproved ingredients, how will it behave when it cannot be sued fordamaging vaccines?
Are the people of America going to be forced to accept into their blood an unproven, untested,
toxic drug that cost about the minimum to produce irrespective of the danger?
The principle of compensation is there to ensure equity in a transaction over the long term. A
buyer buys a product from a seller. If the product proves to be wilfully and negligently faulty, thebuyer can claim compensation. An American takes a vaccine from a manufacturer. If the vaccine
proves to be wilfully and negligent faulty and to lead to death and injury, the person can claim
compensation

100
The mechanism gives an incentive to companies to produce products of reasonable quality. What
incentive to vaccine companies to ensure quality controls when they are given a blanket immunityfrom any damages they cause no matter how faulty their work?
Today, when people can claim compensation, vaccine companies are still producing dangerous
products. What will the vaccine companies do when people can’t claim compensation? What right
did the government have to waive the compensation of the American people?
The Preamble, Constitution and Bill of Rights prohibits the government from forcing the peopleof America to take a shoddily made vaccine under gun point signing away their right tocompensation collectively in advance.
If it is the intention of the government is to produce vaccines to the highest standards then thegovernment should embrace the compensation mechanisms. Because damages is a mechanism toenforce high standards on companies and so act as a counterweight to the pure profit motive.
If the government has blocked damages, just how confident can they be of the safety and thequality of the vaccines?
The people of America are expected to bear all the risks or buy up all the debt, but have been toldin advance that they will never be able to recover their losses. And whatever they do, their losses
will be huge. If they take the vaccine from companies that have admitted to the deliberatecontamination of their drugs, who have a record of causing death and injury and nearly triggering
pandemics, they could lose their health, liberty and life and property will be confiscated fromthem.
If they do not take the vaccine, they will lose their liberty and possibly life and their property will
be useless to them.
To confiscate property for refusing to take an unproven vaccine at gun point is actually theft androbbery.
If I refuse a vacine that will harm me and as a result my assets are taken by force by another, I am
being held to gun point and robbed.
The US government cannot legally and constitutionally expect the citizens of the US to bear theentire risk and loss of the mass vaccination programme themselves while failing to hold the FDA
to account for lapse after lapse.
These lapses go beyond negligence. They show a pattern of activity, a pattern of activity by key
government bodies to protect the vaccine companies at all costs.
Since the government has granted immunity to vaccine companies, every indidivual knows that noone will take care of them medically when the vaccine injurs them. Since the risk of injury and theemotional and financial burden of subsequent recovery is borne exclusively by the individualalone, the individual exclusively has the right to decide whether to obtain said innoculation andbear the risk, or to avoid the risks of an untested vaccine and to take normal precautionary
measures.

XXII. Evidence as to the use of chemtrails for population reduction

Evidence as to the use of chemtrails for population reduction

101“The chemtrail conspiracy theory holds that some contrails are actually chemicals or biologicalagents deliberately sprayed at high altitudes for a purpose undisclosed to the general public,”
according to Wikipedia.
However, contrails are visible in the skies throughout the USA and Europe and the Germany has
admitted carrying out chemtrail operations.

German RTL television reported on the German air forces involvement in chemtrials.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVjKg1JOjVY
Chemtrials have been related to the U.S. Patent #: 5,003,186, titled `Stratospheric Welsbach
Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming," and there is evidence they contain chemicals andbiological agents that cause injury and harm to people and are part of the "biological war" being
waged against the world's population by the elite.
Investigative reporter Jeff Ferrell writes about the chemtrials.
(http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message470752/pg1)
A scientist now confirms that the United States military funded
research which led to a patent suspected of making socalled "chemtrails" in our skies. In this follow-up report,
investigative reporter Jeff Ferrell also discovered a U.S. Air Forcemanual called "Owning the Weather in 2025," which describes the verysame approach.
Ferrell's original report aired on KSLA News 12, the CBS-TV
affiliate in Shreveport, Louisiana where he works as a reporter andanchor. The story attracted attention from hundreds of people acrossthe country and Canada. They watched it on YouTube, Google Video anda host of other web sites that posted the story. In turn, thoseviewers began emailing and calling the station.
While Ferrell immediately began investigating for a follow-up
report, the station's interest in the subject waned. So, here's what
he found out in his independent research:************ *"I learned about U.S. Patent #: 5,003,186, titled`Stratospheric Welsbach Seeding for Reduction of Global Warming,"
better known by chemtrail researchers as "The Welsbach Patent."
The patent describes putting metallic particles like aluminumand barium into jet fuel. Then, exhaust from the jet engine seeds thestratosphere. In turn, those small metallic particles serve a dual
purpose by: 1) reflecting incoming light back into space and 2.)
helping convert the warmth below into infra-red waves, allowing themto escape from the earth's atmosphere.
"It turned out that it seemed to work and so that's why we had
applied for a patent," said patent co-inventor David Chang. Chang
confirmed that the U.S. military did fund that research while heworked at Hughes Aircraft, an aerospace giant at the time. It would
later downsize considerably and evolve into Direct-TV, which required
some of the very same kinds of research and development.
In fact, Chang described several other military-funded projects

102
where jet engine exhaust dispersed metallic particles into theatmosphere. "For instance, we were using it to develop targets forlaser range finders," continued Chang.
I then learned about that U.S. Air Force document
titled, "Owning the Weather in 2025." it details weather
modification for war-fighting and describes putting carbon dust into
jet fuel for dispersal as the quote, 'most convenient, safe and costeffective method," just as the Welsbach Patent explained. Thatmethod is described on page 15 of the Air Force report, originally
written in 1996 as a study paper.
In September of 2002, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell eventold a United Nations World Summit in South Africa quote, "we arecommitted to a billion-dollar program to develop and deploy advanced
technologies to mitigate greenhouse-gas emissions." Powell neverfully elaborated.
And few may remember that the U.S. military used covert weather
modification in the past. During the Vietnam War a top secretmission called "Operation Popeye," seeded clouds over the Ho Chi Minh
Trail to create floods and wash out the enemy's supply routes.
Reporter Jack Anderson is credited with breaking that story back in
1971.
A Discovery Channel program, which first aired in February 2007,
investigated so-called Chemtrails, describing them as contrail
formations that persist in the skies for hours after a jet passes.
But the military refused them access to jet fuel for testing.
"I suspect it may be some sort of weather control," said Stamps,
Arkansas resident Bill Nichols in our first report on the subject,which aired on KSLA News 12. Nichols handed us a mason jar with asample inside containing water and `other' material collected
recently from his back yard. Independent testing at a Shreveport, LA
lab did show high levels of barium, a hallmark of other chemtrail
testing. Louisiana regulators described such a reading as unusual,
but very difficult to prove its source.
Chemtrail skeptics argue barium is used very often commerciallyfor everything from mining to oil drilling. But Chang told me
that's 'exactly' why they considered such material safe to use in ourskies as a welsbach particle.
But, no one has yet to officially confirm a direct connection
between these alleged chemtrails and the U.S. military. Such a
discovery is the 'Holy Grail' of chemtrail researchers. Such arevelation, if there is indeed such a covert program in existence atall, would require someone to step forward and potentially risk court
martial or legal action. Until then, the guessing and the waiting
continue.
Story by Jeff Ferrell“
For more evidence of chemtrials, this report on www.rumormillnews from Canada.

Heads Up--Boost Your Immune System Now--What's Happening in Canada!?!! What To Do!!!

103
Posted By: CrystalRiver <Send E-Mail>
Date: Tuesday, 9-Jun-2009 09:17:05
In Response To: ARE THESE THE 'NEW' CHEMTRAILS OR MAYBE COUNTER MEASURE
AGAINST THEM - INCREDIBLE VIDEO (Sandollar)
Dear RM Agents and Readers,
Just received these this morning; thought you should know:
Hey All,
Just want to report from Vancouver Canada. There is a very strange mix in the chemtrails today. In
all my 10+ years of daily keeping track on all levels I have never felt this one before.
When I left the house this morning I noticed that instead of the usual milky white (chem) sky-there was a mist that went from cloud level to the ground---just a mist ---although it was hot andmorning mist should have long been gone.
I have a long bus ride to the university where i study--so I usually do my reading on the way up
on the bus---but today I found I couldn't focus my eyes (physically) It was very strange--I strained
and I strained but could hardly get any reading done.
In class I found it difficult to stay awake---though it was only a two hour class.
Finally I get home thinking--well maybe I'm just overtired--but happened to glance in the mirror
in the bathroom---and holy moly---my pupils were totally dilated---haven't seen that since thesixties...no wonder I couldn't focus....
Anyway---a new chemtrail mix in this neck of the woods as far as I can tell....
Peace and Love
B------------------------------------------------------B,
Not certain, but that sounds like sodium hexa-fluoride and possibly a bromonated material.
The Mists are what was described in UK as habingers of everyone getting flu like symptoms...I'm
certain the mists are the delivery sperandi for the Flu...Avian or Swine or the one other I heard
about which contains a genitically utated form of e bola...years ago I saw the patents that
describes a weaponized form of this monster...has a high fungal profile with e bola strains mutatedin it.
Better get some form of Shikimic acid, Star Anise or Licorice Root and chew on them and eat
with boiled eggs...that is a good source of Sulfur..same combo as Tami flu..but you just eat
them...suck on the star anise and then chew and swallow...will not hurt you.
Lignite coal solutions such as Willard's water XXX can be used to neutralize sodium hexa
fluoride...you can get off the Internet at Willards Water or CAW (Catalyst Altered water)
Have also seen the patents where the US Air Farce uses Melanin powder in these sprays...you104
inhale and makes you super sleepy and tired.
Now, making people really sick, can't see...think you might die...then the Martial Law exercise in
July makes a lot more sense...they will offer emergency vaccines...just as we always thought theywould.....this is the front line in battling these damned Serpents!
Mike Castle

Dilated pupils indicate sympathomimetic amines -- possibly cholinergic, serotonergic or
dopaminergic. These three are the most common pharmaceutical classes which cause dilated
pupils (mydriasis). For example , an agent to ruin memory (anticholinergic) can have this effect.
I would bet on cholinergic in the chemtrails -- the military has been experimenting with thesesince the 50s. They would be great for disrupting social memory. The key to determining whichclass is to note other side effects (sweating, dry mouth, etc) and you can tell which class thepharmaceutical agent belongs.
Sympathomimetic amines: Symptoms based on receptor system
1) Serotonergic: any of the following: altered visual perception, visual fragmentation, synthesisia(crossing of senses), lack of emotion and/or unprovoked intense emotion, inability to coherently
integrate emotions, altered perception of time and space, altered perception of self , 'self-in-world',
or 'self-through-time', altered function of empathy, muscular tension, teeth grinding, altered visual
processing and visual system integration, nausea, fragmentation of 'time-sense' coherency.
Examples include: LSD, Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, MDMA, Celexa, Remeron.
2) Dopaminergic: any of the following: increased heart rate, feelings of power or invincibility,
increased pulse / blood pressure, confidence, altered perception of time, suppressed appetite,altered function of memory processing or integration, insomnia, suppression of slow wave sleep,
induction of serum cortisol, altered immune system function, suppression of adaptive immune
system, induction of neutrophil activity, possible dehydration. Examples include: Amphetamine,
Bupropion, Methylphenidate, Modafinil, Ephedrine, Epinephrine, etc.
3) Cholinergic: any of the following: lack of sweating and/or profuse sweating, lack of salivationor profuse salivation, confusion, memory loss, muscle weakness, muscle tremor, profoundly realvisual hallucinations, fragmentation of 'time-sense' coherency, disorientation, externally obvious
psychosis, etc. The biggest give away is profoundly increased or decreased salivation. Examples
include: Chlorpheniramine, Brompheniramine, Diphenhydramine, Atropine, BZP, etc and ofcourse nerve agents.

Most 'first-gen' military weapons (1950s) involved #3 but I am sure they have some complex
mixes these days. The vast majority of the spraying contains a military non-carbon based
nanotech synthetic epigenetic parasite with synthetic erythrocytes -- but no doubt the luciferianNATO military are throwing drug aerosols in there too to make sure the sheeple stay brain-dead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-quinuclidinyl_benzilate

XXIII. Evidence as to the existence of an international corporate crime syndicate

105
President John F. Kennedy spoke about the existence of this syndicate in a speech given to the US
press association on April 27, 1961.
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies
primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead ofinvasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillasby night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material
resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military,
diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations areconcealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, notpraised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts theCold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.”The „monolithic and ruthless conspiracy“ is behind the plans to cause genocide using an artificial
virus after collapsing the financial system.
To the international organised corporate crime syndicate, which I contend, assassinated John F
Kennedy when he began to oppose them, specifically, by returning the Federal Reserve to thePeople of America, belong the leaders of the oil and gas industry who have suppressed renewableenergy technologies.
The Global Elite plan a New World Order with an enslaved “police state” culture. How might thisbe done? One way is the Patriot Act. Another could be the 800 FEMA detention camps fully
constructed, staffed, and awaiting prisoners.
There are reasons to believe that this foreign-based international corporate criminal organisation,commonly referred to in popular language as the „Illuminati“, which operates through various
informal and formal organisations such as the „Bilderbergs“, the United Nations and the World
Health Organisation, is conducting a secret biological war against the population of the UnitedStates, and the world, and has set up in covert and funded an elaborate dual purpiose bioweapons
programme, involving vaccine companies and international government agencies such as the
WHO to engineer and then release a pandemic virus to cause death and disease at least three times
this year, first in Austria, second in Mexico, third in Switzerland for political and financial gain.
The creation of a pandemic will result in the implementation of a government mandated mass
compulsory vaccination programs in the United States, and could lead to the death not only of
hundreds of millions of Americans but billions of people around the world leaving a large
proportion of the world’s natural resources and other assets in the hands of the „Illuminati.“
I allege that this is part of a long term plan by the syndicate, who have built large numbers of
FEMA concentration camps with incinerators and prepared mass graves in states such as Indiana
and in New York to quarantine people and dispose of the bodies of the people who are killed by
the bioweapons attack.

XXIV. Evidence as to the existence of the “Illuminati”

There is evidence that the „Illuminati“ are the inner core of the international crime syndicate
planning genocide by means of an artificial virus. Memembers of the Illuminati include the Queen
Beatrix of The Netherlands, David de Rothschild, Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller. The
Illuminati is a secret organization to overthrow the rule of all soveriegn nations and gain
domination over the world’s poltiical and economic systems.

106

The Illuminati leadership is in the hands of a few families or groups, who like the mafia, pass the„Knowledge“ on from generation to generation, protecting their activities by a code of silence or
Omerta towards outsiders as well as by the use of occult symbols.
The Illuminati operate through secret socieities such as the freemasons as well as throughorganisations such as the Bilderbergs, Trilateral Commission and Council of Foreign Relations.
The world’s first truly global crime syndidcate, they base themselves in off shore banking centersand employ international organisations such as the UN and WHO.
The Illuminati’s interactions with politics are dominated by expediency. Their aim is to use theirmoney to get their candidates elected to implement legislation to achieve as total a control overthe country’s economy as possible in order to maximise the private profits flowing to theIlluminati banks whether through „bailouts“ or through wars generating debts for which they canearn interest.
The Illuminati is distinguished by a strong anti human ideology, a conviction they belong to asuperior „Bloodline“ and fascination for the Occult and rituals. The Illuminati believe there will
be massive changes in the earth’s geomagentic sphere in 2012 and are anxious to surive what they
perceive as a time of upheaval by decimating the world’s population rapidly, so leaving themmore of the earth’s natural resources to use.
Because the Illuminati fund and control the western mainstream media, their existence is airbrushed out of the news as are any information that would give the general public an insight into
their criminal activities, including the manipulation of financial stocks and oil prices as wel as
their plans to commit genocide using artificially engineered viruses and vaccines containing
toxins.
However, sometimes a glimpse of the Illuminati and their plans can be found in the mainstream
media.
For example, the UK Telegraph ran a 'fictional' „slideshow“ story about a series of nuclear attacks
and the formation of a foreign-controlled, totalitarian government, called the UNA, after thedismantlement of the United States complete with scenes of vaccinations and chip implants called
Black Jack this winter, which was replete with Illuminati Occult symbols.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/4220575/Blackjack.html
There were five parts that were presented in the Culture secion without comment on consecutive
weeks.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/4315740/Blackjack---Part-2.-Aslideshow-story.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4515126/Blackjack---Part-3.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4590866/Blackjack---Part-4.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/4613223/Blackjack---Part-5.html

The slide show story Blackjack was discussed in the media, also at www.infowars.com.

107
http://www.infowars.com/operation-blackjack-the-story-of-terrorist-nuclear-attacks-on-majorwestern-cities/“Operation Blackjack: The Story of Terrorist Nuclear Attacks on Major Western Cities
Cryptogon
January 13, 2009This little curiosity comes to us from the Telegraph’s Culture Picture Galleries section.
As of now, there’s an entry called: Operation Blackjack: The Story of Terrorist Nuclear Attacks on
Major Western Cities.
On the page, we read: Blackjack - A slide show story. The events portrayed in this slide show are
entirely fictitious.
There is no author listed.
I didn’t spend too much time gazing at the chicken entrails, but there were a few howlers thatwere too good to pass up:

Remember the Kingstar (controlled demolition company) van near the exploded bus on the 7/7
London bomings? That’s what came to mind for me.
Also, the ‘fictitious’ attack occurs during the Summer solstice. What’s the name on the side of thevan? New Dawn Presentations. And its logo? That’s right, the Sun.”108
The sun Logo on the van is notably similar to that for the “Black Sun” (notorious Nazi occultic
symbol), as it is depicted in the following Black Sun-themed page, for example…
http://www.myspace.com/blacksunrisingpylon
And the “New Dawn…” company name on the van of course has the Luciferian/Venus-theme,
coupled with Obama/Inauguration reference, ‘all over it’.
The name “Blackjack” here presumably derives from the game, which is also known as Twentyone (the featured date).
There is a green snake on the van in Toronto.
The numerical dates featured in the story - 21st & 22nd - are the same as those mentioned by
Colin Powell for the soon coming “Event” in the present month (January).
Symbolism: June 22nd. 22 from June 22nd. is a double 11. The time is 8:03:27, 8+0+3 from 8:03
is 11, and from the seconds 27, you have 2+7=9, so you have an 11:9, or a 9-11. Also if you takethe 22 from June 22nd, you have a double 11, and you get a third 11 from 8:03 (8+3=11). So you
have 3 11s, and in numerology, when you take a number 3 times over, you give it the highest
power of that number.
Also in Part 5 The symbols and dates and numbers, codes used are intestersting. Date on the Press
Representative ID card is 09-11-11.
The Operation to take over the USA by means of false flag operations is called Teardrop and theteardrop is a stylised visual element used in ancient Egyptian art to depict the peregrine falcon.
In Part 5 of the Black Jack there is series of numbers on a slide whose code can be broken usinga hexadecimal string to read “this is not simply entertainment.”
If you type in this number(74686973206973206e6f742073696d706c7920656e7465727461696e6d656e74) from the ID card
into a HEXADECIMAL to STRING converter, then you get the following message:“this is not simply entertainment”
http://www.prisonplanet.com/weird-hexadecimal-code-and-possible-warning-in-telegraphsoperation-blackjack-part-5.html
XXV. Evidence of the Illuminati’s involvement in the current collapse of the world’s financial
system.

There is evidence that the international corporate crime syndicate, which controls the westernworld’s banking system, deliberately crashed the economy to achieve certain objectives, including
a new world government with the World Health Organisation as a new world health agency.
Former New York Governor Elliot Spitzer has only spoken of accounting fraud and the bailout asa pretext to transfer money from the taxpayers to banks controlled by the Illuminati.
“Spitzer had some pointed criticism for the way the Obama administration has been handling thebank bailouts. When Spitzer was attorney general of New York, he prosecuted AIG and other Wall

109
Street banks, and Maddow asked him if he saw a connection between those prosecutions and what
led to the current crisis.
Spitzer said "Absolutely," and while the specific instruments and mechanisms, derivatives andcredit default swaps, may have changed, the "fundamental accounting fraud... the desperate desire
to cook the books," is present in the current collapse.
Spitzer worries that despite the government spending trillions of dollars to bail these companies
out, "not nearly enough is changing." Essentially, we are not doing enough to combat the systemic
problem of companies that are too big to fail:We are rebuilding the same edifice. We are re-establishing the primacy of the same companies.
We are still building in a too-big-to-fail structure so that so that we as taxpayers will be guarantors
of companies that when they get into trouble again, we will bail them out. None of this is being
confronted by the administration as they, and we through our tax dollars, resuscitate a broken
system.
Spitzer also highlighted that one of the reasons for the massive scale of the current financial crisis
is that our economy has been so over-leveraged and that what had to happen in order to right our
economy was to de-leverage. However, Spitzer argues, we haven't de-leveraged at all; we've
simply transferred the obligation from the banks to the taxpayers, and the taxpayers have gotten a
raw deal in the process.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/12/rachel-maddow-eliot-spitz_n_202725.html
Professor William Black has also touched on the theme.
“Associate Professor of Economics and Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of
Law. He was the Executive Director of the Institute for Fraud Prevention from 2005-2007. He
previously taught at the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, and at Santa
Clara University. He was litigation director for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, deputy
director of the FSLIC, SVP and the General Counsel of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco.[2]”“On April 3, 2009 Black appeared on "Bill Moyers Journal" on PBS and provided some disturbing
commentary on the current banking crisis.[3] In the interview with Bill Moyers,[4] Black asserted
that our current banking crisis is essentially a big Ponzi scheme, that the "liar loans" and otherfinancial tricks were essentially illegal frauds, and that the triple-A ratings given to these loans
was part of a criminal cover up. He said that the "Prompt Corrective Action Law" passed after the
Savings and Loan crisis mandated that ailing banks should be put into receivership. Black also
stated that trying to hide how bad the situation is will simply prolong the problem, as happened inJapan's lost decade. Black stated that Timothy Geithner is engaged in a cover-up, and that theadministration does not want people to understand what went wrong or how bad the banking
situation is today.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_K._BlackThe New York Times reported Yra Harris, a commodoties trader, alleging the Wall Street Banks
see transparency about their operations as inimical to their profits. This is surely a pretty good
definition of „crime.“
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/business/01lobby.html

110“The banks want to go back to business as usual — and then some. And they have a lot of
audacity now that everyone has bailed them out,” said Yra Harris, an independent commodities
trader who was involved in an effort to regulate derivatives nine years ago. “But we have to begin
with the premise that Wall Street doesn’t want transparency, because more transparency means
less immediate profits.”

XXVI. Evidence as to the depopulation agenda of the Illuminati/Bilderbergs and theirinvolvement in the engineering and release of the artificial “swine flu” virus

On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger, an adviros to
President Obama, completed a classified 200-page study, “National Security Study Memorandum
200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests“
arguing that that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a
grave threat to U.S. national security.
Adopted as official policy in 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan toreduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war andfamine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (thesame post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing
the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries ofstate, treasury, defense, and agricultur.
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/kiss_nssm_jb_1995.html
In a study published in 1996, the he US Air Force proposed a pandemic in 2009http://www.infowars.com/us-air-force-study-proposed-2009-influenza-pandemic-in-1996/.
These are just some of the documents and materials available pointing to a depopulation agenda,
but also of note are the State of New York Division of Cemeteries “Mass Fatality forms” sent tocemeteries in that state to collect data about their ability to deal with the high volume of casualties
that would occur if their were a flu pandemic or other disaster. The form letter that this officereceived was dated April 4, 2007, as reported in Infowars with a link to the pdf of the forms.
http://www.infowars.com/plans-for-mass-graves-confirmed-government-surveying-cemeteryreadiness-for-flu-outbreak/The biggest threat to the planet is PEOPLE: there are simply too many, doing too welleconomically and burning too much oil.” -- Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview.
“My three main goals would be to 1. reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, 2.
destroy the industrial infrastructure and 3. have wilderness, with it’s full complement of species,
returning throughout the world.” --- Dave Foreman, Club of Rome, Bilderberger, and co-founderof Earth First!
“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be
ideal.” ---Ted Turner, founder of CNN and major UN donor.
“------the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one
billion.” ------- Club of Rome publication titled “Goals for Mankind.”

111“If I were re-incarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a perfected killer virus to lower
human population levels!” --- Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh“I suspect that eradicating smallpox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing
ecosystems.” --- John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal“The extinction of the human species may not only be INEVITABLE, but a GOOD THING.” ---Christopher Manes, Earth First!
“As in China, the act of childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless theparents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive
chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” --- DavidBrower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club.
The international crime corporate syndicate, including bankers such as David de Rotschild andGeorge Soris, have provided the funds for the bioweapons programme by instructing their funds
or banks to invest in pharmacuetical stock and by instructing their agents in government tochannel public finance to covert biooweapons, vaccines programmes through a the complex webof financial instruments, also offshore.

112
XXVII. Evidence as to the Genocide Agenda by means of Weaponised Flu being discussed at theannual Bilderberg meeting in Athens from May 14-17, 2009.

Kevin Trudeau has recently said that he has personally spoken to Bilderberg members who haveexpressed their desire to see “two thirds of the dumb people” wiped off the planet, and suggested
in an interview on the Alex Jones show that some of these conversations occurred in or aroundthe annual Bilderberg Group, which took place this year in Vouliagmeni, close to Athens, Greece,
from 14-17th of May.
http://www.infowars.com/billionaire-elite-want-two-thirds-of-the-dumb-people-wiped-off-theplanet/
The Greek Newspaper To Vima OnLine(http://www.tovima.gr/default.asp?pid=2&artid=268290&ct=32&dt=16/05/2009) and an official
press release (http://info.kopp-verlag.de/fileadmin/user_upload/allgemein/200905/Bilderberger_PM.pdf) includes among the attendees David Rockefeller, Lawrence Summers,
Paul Wolfowitz as well as Daniel Vasella, head of Novartis, the company that carried out the bird
flu trials in summer 2008, resulting in the deaths of homeless people in Poland, and Werner
Faymann the Chancellor of Austria, where Baxter’s subsidiary responsible for sending out 72
kilos of bird flu virus, originating from WHO, is located.
Another list indicating who did or did not turn up for the meeting by means of the use of a +/symbol is available on the Swiss website Alles Schall und Rauch (http://allesschallundrauch.blogspot.com/2009/05/liste-der-teilnehmer-bilderberg-2009.html).
The surname of the Austrian Chancellor is misspelled as Feymann in this list. The attendance ofWerner Faymann is however, further, confirmed by a parliamentary question tabled by Austrian
MP Martin Strutz (http://www.bzoe-klub.at/Pressedienste/Mai_2009/17.05.2009_Strutz.html) tobe addressed to the Faymann, requesting information about Faymann’s attendance at the
Bilderberg meetings, which were originally financed by the CIA, maintains Strutz.
The list of attendees given on Alles Schall und Rauch is as follows:“Beatrix - Königin der Niederlande
Sofia - Königin von Spanien
Konstantin - ehemaliger König von Griechenland
Philipp - Prinz von Belgien, Mitglied des Club of RomeJoseph Ackerman - Vorstandsvorsitzende der Deutschen Bank
Kieth Alexander - Direktor der US National Security Agency (NSA), grösster Geheimdienst der
Welt
Georgios Alogoskoufis - ehemaliger Wirtschafts- und Finanzminister Griechenland
Roger Altman - Vizefinanzminister unter Präsident Clinton
Efstratios-Georgios A. Arapoglou - Zentralbankchef Griechenland
Ali Babacan - Aussenminister Türkei, Koordinator für die Beitrittsverhandlungen der Türkei mit
der EU
Dora Bakoyannis - Aussenminister Griechenland+Jon Frederik Baksaas - Chef von Telenor NorwegenFrancisco Pinto Balsemão - Portugisischer Ministerpräsident
Nicolas Baverez - Herausgeber Le Point Frankreich
Franco Bernabè - Chef von Telecom Italia, stellvertretender Vorsitzender von Rothschild Europe-Xavier Bertrand - Generalsekretär der UMP Partei Frankreich
Nils Daniel Carl Bildt - Aussenminister Schweden

113
Jan Arne Björklund - Bildungsminister, Parteivorsitzenden der Folkpartiet liberalerna Schweden
Christoph Blocher - ehemaliger Bundesrat und ehemaliger Parteichef der SVP
Alexandre Bompard - Journalist Radio Europe 1 Frankreich+Vendeline von Bredow - Wirtschaftsjournalist The Economist+Oscar Bronner - Herausgeber Der Standard Österreich+Max Boot - Autor, Berater, Historiker, Ober-Neocon und CFR Mitglied-Ana Botín - Tochter des Präsidenten der Banco de Santander Emilio Botín+Henri de Castries - Chef der AXA
Juan Luis Cebrián - Chef er PRISA Group of Media Spanien-W. Edmund Clark - Chef Toronto-Dominion Bank Kanada-Kenneth Harry Clarke - ex-Finanzminister Grossbritannien
Luc Coene - Chef der belgischen Nationalbank+Timothy C. Collins - Chef von Ripplewood Holdings
George David - Präsident CocaCola Griechenland
Sir Richard Billing Dearlove - ex-Chef des britischen Geheimdienstes MI6
Anna Diamantopoulou - Parlamentsmitglied der PASOK Griechenland
Mario Draghi - Chef der italienischen Zentralbank+Nicolas N. Eberstadt - American Enterprise InstituteAnders Eldrup - Chef und Präsident von DONG Energy Dänemark
John Jacob Philip Elkann - Vizepräsident des Fiat-Konzerns
Thomas Enders - Chef Airbus
José Manuel Entrecanales - Chef des Baukonzerns Acciona Spanien+Werner Feymann - Bundesparteivorsitzender der SPÖ österreichischer Bundeskanzler-Isidro Fainé Casas - Präsident der Caixa Bank und SEAT Berater
Niall Ferguson - Professor für Wirtschaft an der Havard Business School-Timothy Franz Geithner - Finanzminister der USA
Dermot Gleeson - Berater der irischen Regierung und Geschäftsmann
Donald E. Graham - Chef der Washinton Post
-Alfred Gusenbauer - ex-Bundeskanzler Österreich
Victor Halberstadt - Professor für Wirtschaftswissenschaften Uni Leiden
Ernst Hirsch Ballin - Justizminister der NiederlandeRichard Holbrooke - Sonderbeauftragter für Pakistan und Afghanistan für Obama+Jan H.M. Hommen - Vorsitzender ING Bank
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer - NATO-Generalsekretär
James Logan Jones Jr. - Sicherheitsberater von Präsident Obama
Vernon Eulion Jordan - ehemaliger Sicherheitsberater von Präsident Clinton-Robert Kagan - US-Regierungsberater für Sicherheitspolitik, Terrorismus und den Balkan
Jyrki Katainen - Finanzminister Finnland-Henry Alfred Kissinger - ex-US-Sicherheitsberater und US-Aussenminister, Chef von alles+John M. Keane - SCP Partner, ex-US-General+Muhtar Kent - Präsident der Coca Cola Company+John Kerr - Mitglied des House of Lords, Vizevorsitzender Royal Dutch Shell+Eckart von Klaeden - MdB, Aussenpolitischer Sprecher der CDU/CSU+Klaus Kleinfed - Präsident von Alcoa Inc.
Mustafa Koç - Vorsitzender der Koç Holding der grösste türkische Mischkonzern
Roland Koch - hessischer Ministerpräsident
Sami Kohen - aussenpolitische Kolumnist der türkischen Zeitung Milliyet
Henry Kravis - Hudson InstituteMarie-Josee Kravis - Hudson Institute
Neelie Kroes - EU-Kommissar für Wettbewerb
Odysseas Kyriakopoulos - Präsident des Verbandes Griechischer Industrien+Christine Lagarde - Ministerin für Wirtschaft, Industrie und Arbeit Frankreich+Pascal Lamy - Generaldirektor Welthandelsorgansation WTO
Manuela Ferreira Leite - Chefin der portugiesischen Sozialdemokraten PSD

114Bernardino León - spanische Staatssekretär für auswärtige Angelegenheiten+Peter Löscher - Chef Siemens AG+Peter Mandelson - Wirtschaftsminister GB-Jessica Tuchman Mathews - Präsidentin der Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Denkfabrik
Philippe Maystadt - Präsident der Europäischen Investitionsbank (EIB)+Edward McBride - Wirtschaftsredaktor The Economist
Frank McKenna - Vizevorsitzender der TD Bank Financial GroupJohn Micklethwait - Wirtschaftsredakteur The Economist
Thierry Montbrial - President des l'Institut français des relations internationales
Mario Monti - Präsident der Wirtschaftsuniversität Luigi Bocconi
Miguel Ángel Moratinos - Aussenminister Spanien
Craig Mundie - Chefstratege Microsoft
Egil Myklebust - ex-Vorsitzender der SAS, Norsk Hydro ASA, Mitglied des Weltwirtschaftsrat fürNachhaltige Entwicklung
Matthias Nass - Stellvertretender Herausgeber "Die Zeit"+Juan Maria Nin Génova - Präsident la Caixa Bank
Denis Olivennes - Direktor Nouvel Observateur Frankreich+Jorma Ollila - Vorsitzender Royal Dutch Shell+George Osboren - Schatzkanzler GB
Frederic Oudea - Chef Societe General Bank Frankreich-Cem Özdemir - Bundesvorsitzender der Partei Bündnis 90/Die Grünen
Tommaso Padoa-Schioppa - ex-Finanzminister Italien+Alexis Papahelas - Journalist Kathimerini
Dimitris Papalexopoulos - Chef Titan Cement Company S.A. Griechenland
Jannos Papathanasiou - Wirtschafts- und Finanzminister Griechenland
Richard Perle - Sicherheitsberater unter George W. Bush, Hauptverantwortliche für den Irakkrieg-David Petraeus - US-Viersternegeneral, Kommandeur des US Central Command, zuständig fürden Nahen Osten und Zentralasien
Manuel Pinho - Minister für Wirtschaft und Inovation Portugal+Jean Pisani-Ferry - Direktor von Bruegel
Robert S. Prichard - Chef der Zeitung Toronto Star Kanada
Romano Prodi - ex-Ministerpräsident Italien, ex-Präsident der Europäischen Kommission+Hanna Rajalahti - Chefredakteur Talouselämä-Olli Rehn - EU-Erweiterungskommissar Finnland
Heather Reisman - Chefin Indigo Books & Music Inc Kanada
Eivind Reiten - Generaldirektor des Petroleumskonzerns Norsk Hydro
Michael Ringier - Verwaltungsratspräsident der Ringier Holding AG, grösster Verlag der Schweiz
David Rockefeller - Banker, Gründer der Council on Foreign Relations und Trilateralen
Kommission, Capo di tutti Capi
-Dennis B. Ross - Direktor des Washington Institute for Near East Policy Denkfabrik
Barnett R. Rubin - Director of Studies and Senior Fellow Center of International Cooperation-Alberto Ruiz-Gallardòn - Bürgermeister von Madrid
Suzan Sabancı Dinçer - Chefin der Akbank Türkei
Indira Samarasekera - Präsidentin der University of Alberta
Rudolf Scholten - Mitglied des Vorstandes Österreichische Kontrollbank AG-Jürgen Schrempp - ex-Vorstandsvorsitzender der DaimlerChrysler AG+Josette Sheeran - Diektor UNO Welternährungsprogramm+Domenico Siniscalco - Vizevorsitzender Morgan Stanley Int.
Pedro Solbes Mira - ex-Wirtschafts- und Finanzminister Spanien-Sampatzi Saraz - türkischer Banker-Sanata Seketa - Kanada+James B. Steinberg - US-Vizeaussenminister+Björn Stigson - Präsident des Weltwirtschaftrats für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (WBCSD)

115+Yannis Stournaras - Direktor bei der Foundation for Economic & Industrial Research (IOBE)-Dominique Strauss-Kahn - Chef des Internationalen Währungsfonds-Lawrence Summers - ex-Chefökonom der Weltbank, ex-Finanzminister unter Clinton,
Wirtschaftsberater von Obama
Peter Denis Sutherland - ex-EU-Wettbewerbskommissar, Vorsitzender von BP and Goldman
Sachs International+Nobuo Tanaka - Direktor Organisation für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Martin Taylor - ex-Chef der Barclays Bank, Vorsitzender von Syngenta, ex-Generalsekretär der
Bilderberg Group
Peter Thiel - ex-Chef PayPal, Clarium Capital Management+Helle Thorning-Schmidt - Parteichef der Sozialdemokraten Dänemark+Thomas Thune Andersen - Chef Maersk Oil Dänemark+Andreas Treichl - Chef Erste Group Bank AG Österreich
Jean-Claude Trichet - Chef der Europäischen Zentralbank+Loukas Tsoukalis - Sonderberater von Kommissionspräsident Barroso, Chef der ELIAMEP
Agah Ugur - Chef Borusan Holding Türkei
Matti Vanhanen - Premieminister Finnland
Daniel Vasella - Chef von Novartis
Jeroen van der Veer - Chef Royal Dutch Shell-Guy Verhofstadt - ehemaliger Premierminister Belgien
Paul Volcker - ehemaliger Fed Chef, Wirtschaftsberater von Barack Obama
Jacob Wallenberg - Bankier und Grossindustrieller Schweden
Marcus Wallenberg - Bankier und Grossindustrieller Schweden
Nout Wellink - Chef der niederländischen Zentralbank, Mitglied der Europäischen Zentralbank
Gerardus Johannes Wijers - Chef von AkzoNobel, ex-Wirtschaftsminister der NiederlandeMartin Wolf - Journalist der Financial Times
James David Wolfensohn - ehemaliger Präsident der Weltbank
Paul Wolfowitz - ex-Präsident der Weltbank, Berater von George W. Bush, und stellvertretender
ex-Verteidigungsminister der USA, Ober-Neocon und Hauptverantwortlicher für den Irakkrieg-Fareed Zakaria - Chefredakteur von Newsweek International und politischer Kommentator bei
ABC News, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, New Yorker und CNN
Robert Zoellick - Präsident der Weltbank“
In an interview on the Alex Jones show, Trudeau acknowledged he had been in Greece around thetime of the annual Bilderberg meeting in Athens and implied that he attended the Bilderberg
Group meeting, stating that he personally knew many Bilderberg members who he “conversedwith on a regular basis”, including Crown Prince Albert II of Monaco.
Trudeau expands on the conviction of the Bilderberg, a group associated with the Illuminati, thatthey are genetically superior to the rest of humanity.
Bilderberg attendees go on record playing down the content of the meetings, portraying them as aseries of dry policy discussions. However, their refusal to divulge the contents of their meetings is
consistent with the contention that this is a group meeting in secret to plot financial and biologicalcrimes against humanity.
According to Trudeau the elite, comprising the Illuminati and Bilderberg, openly talk about their
desire for a massive global population reduction, something indirectly confirmed by elite insiders
like Johnathan Porrit, UK government “green” advisor, calling for the population of the UK to be
reduced in the Times to 30 million on March 22, 2009 in the interval between the release of thebird flu pandemic material in Austria and the swine flu pandemic material in Mexico.
(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5950442.ece):116
A week later on March 31st, an interview with Dr Nina Federoff, advisor to President Obama,
appeared in the BBC, in which Dr Federoff stated there were too many people on the planet:„We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can't support
many more people," Dr Fedoroff said, stressing the need for humans to become much better atmanaging "wild lands", and in particular water supplies.“
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7974995.stm“Some of the conversations you have on the 200 foot yachts off the coast of Monaco - you can’t
believe what really goes on behind closed doors,” said Trudeau, noting that Alex Jones had
exposed such issues in his documentary films, notably Endgame. The billionaire said that he had
recently spent time in Monaco with Crown Prince Albert II.
Trudeau stated that elitists he had talked to thought their plans were for the greater good of
humanity but that they believed there were two classes of people on earth, the ruling elite and the“worker bees,” , and that the elite were defined not necessarily by money or power, but by their
genetic ancestry.
Trudeau shockingly detailed conversations with elitists during which they brazenly admitted their
desire for massive global population reduction.
“I’ve been sitting on the boats off the coast of Barbados with the guys who basically said we needto get two-thirds of the dumb people off the planet - I’ve been in the meetings,” said Trudeau,adding that such words were not spoken in an evil manner, but in a “matter of fact” way under thepretext that such a thing would be for the good of planet earth.
Revealingly, Trudeau said that elitists see Alex Jones as an annoyance but tolerate him because
they believe Jones as well as Trudeau himself are, “desensitizing people to these realities,” which in a way works to their benefit.
“I’ve been told that’s why I still get invited on the yachts,” added Trudeau.
Trudeau aid that the elite was divided into two camps, one larger faction that, “Categoricallybelieves they are genetically superior than the rest of the population,” and another smaller faction,
mainly comprising of younger people, that are feeding Trudeau information who, “Have come tothe conclusion that some people are smarter than others, some people are more talented thanothers, some people are more motivated to work….but everyone should be allowed to succeed or
fail based on their own choices or initiative….and that’s where there’s a split and a division right
now at the highest levels,” said Trudeau.
Also, among the Bilderberg attendees in Athens was John Kerr, of Royal Dutch Shell, underlining
the financial connection between the Illuminati and Bilderbergs and oil companies. Queen Beatrixof The Netherlands, who also attended the meeting, is a leading Bilderberg member. Her father
Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, was a member of Nazi Germany’s SS and worked for IG
Farben, helped organise the first Bilderberg meeting in 1954, and later served on more than 300
corporate boards.
Rather than relieving the pressure on the environment by switching over to renewable energy
sources, the financial elite have agreed in secret to reduce the world’s population and by means of
the use of a huge secret bioweapons programme hidden from the general public under the guise ofprotecting the general public against a pandemic they created by using vaccines, and they
discussed their plans for depopulation, so Kevin Trudeau has suggested, at the Bilderberg meetingin Athens.

117
Attending the meeting in Athens were key players in the bioweapons programme, including theCEO of Novartis, Daniel Vassella, and Werner Faymann, whose government has given cover toBaxter’s subsidiary in Austria in triggering a pandemic.

XXVIII. Evidence as to the profits of pharmaceutical companies in the event of a pandemic
According to the Times, the UK government alone has signed a deal with Baxter andGlaxoSmithKline for 90 million doses of the vaccine.
The Austrian government has a contract for 16 million doses with Baxter.
„Baxter & GlaxoSmithKline making millions from fear of swine flu epidemic« on: May 15, 2009, 08:40:41 AM »________________________________________
Swine flu: Government signs up for 90 million doses of vaccine
May 15, 2009http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article6293951.ece
Ministers have signed agreements to secure up to 90 million doses of swine flu vaccine despite thefact that a pandemic has not yet been declared, it was announced today.
The deals with pharmaceutical companies GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and Baxter will secure “earlysupplies” of a vaccine for the newly identified H1N1 strain.
Enough “pre-pandemic” vaccine has been ordered to protect at least half of the population by
December, at an estimated cost of £100 million. This is in addition to the purchase of 500 million
doses of anti-viral drugs that have already been stockpiled to help treat illness and deals to procure
vaccine in the event of a pandemic.
So far 78 cases of the newly identified H1N1 strain have been confirmed in Britain, with all those
infected showing only minor symptoms. However, experts predict that swine flu — which isactually a recombination of existing animal and human flu strains — could cause a second wave
of more widespread illness in winter.
The Department of Health said that today’s agreement could provide enough vaccine to protect
health workers and the most vulnerable patients before a pandemic arrived, without affecting thenormal supply of seasonal flu vaccine.
The Government has already signed agreements worth £155 million to supply up to 132 million
doses of vaccine to inoculate people in the event of a pandemic. It has also procured enough antiviral drugs to cover 80 per cent of the population, at a cost of more than £500 million.
But it refused to disclose the additional cost of the new contracts signed today.
The World Health Organisation’s official alert level remains at phase five out of six — one stepaway from declaring a global pandemic. But France, Belgium and Finland are among othercountries that are stockpiling doses of potential vaccine as a precautionary measure for such an
event. „Re: Baxter & GlaxoSmithKline making millions from fear of swine flu epidemic« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2009, 08:51:36 AM »

118________________________________________
Boost in output of antivirals to treat swine flu benefits drug firms
Thursday 30 April 2009http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/30/swine-flu-drugs-glaxosmithkline-roche
Drugs firms led by GlaxoSmithKline and Swiss group Roche have seen a jump in their shareprices as they rush to crank up production of the few antiviral drugs shown to have been effectivein the treatment of the new deadly strain of swine flu.
Governments around the world have been in contact with those specialist firms known to haveexpertise in the production of drugs to treat the flu virus and in the development vaccines toprevent its spread. They are keen to shore up stockpiles and prepare for a surge in vaccination
demands in the northern hemisphere this winter.
Top of their list has been Glaxo, which has seen its share price leap 8% since the World HealthOrganisation declared outbreaks of swine flu in the US and Mexico over the weekend to havebecome a "public health emergency of international concern".
The British company is urgently looking to increase production of Relenza, one of two anitviraltreatments found to be effective against the new flu strain. Glaxo has been in talks with the WHO,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the health department in the US, and thegovernment of Mexico.
Since the start of the outbreak, Glaxo has supplied 100,000 packs of Relenza, an inhaled drug, and170,000 additional doses of its seasonal flu vaccine to the Mexican authorities at their request.
Also besieged with requests is Swiss firm Roche which makes the antiviral pill Tamiflu. The
company has pledged to use its "rapid response stockpile" as directed by the WHO, though norequest has been made yet.
Several drug firms with expertise in developing vaccines have been in touch with the WHOrequesting samples of the virus in order to begin work on a preventative. French firm SanofiAventis said it was "ready to work" with international health officials when asked. Chicago-based
Baxter International has asked the WHO for samples, but none have arrived yet.
Companies producing face masks are boosting production to meet a surge in demand. Kimberley
Clark said it had increased production and would not run out of stock. "We are closely monitoring
our inventory, and have increased production ... in order to minimise potential disruptions in ourability to meet customer demand."

About sanofi-aventis
Sanofi-aventis, a leading global pharmaceutical company, discovers, develops and distributes
therapeutic solutions to improve the lives of everyone. Sanofi-aventis is listed in Paris(EURONEXT: SAN) and in New York (NYSE: SNY).
Sanofi pasteur, the vaccines division of sanofi-aventis Group, provided more than 1.6 billion
doses of vaccine in 2008, making it possible to immunize more than 500 million people across theglobe. A world leader in the vaccine industry, sanofi pasteur offers the broadest range of vaccinesprotecting against 20 infectious diseases. The company's heritage, to create vaccines that protect
life, dates back more than a century. Sanofi Pasteur is the largest company entirely dedicated tovaccines. Every day, the company invests more than EUR1 million in research and development.
For more information, please visit: www.sanofipasteur.com or www.sanofipasteur.us.

119

BirMex - http://www.birmex.gob.mx/
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.birmex.gob.mx/&ei=LPjzSbXFOCblQeZv7XRDA&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DBirme
x%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DG
Biological Laboratories Reagents and Mexico, SA de CV (Birmex) is a company owned by theFederal Government of Mexico that develops, produces and sells imported vaccines, sera andheterologous clinical diagnostic products.
To meet the demand of the Mexican market, Birmex also sells vaccines, immunoglobulins anddiagnostic products manufactured by other companies.
Faced with the challenges of the future, Birmex is developing new vaccines with modern
technology to complement its service to its customers.

Bruce Japsen | Tribune staff reporter
11:43 AM CDT, May 7, 2009
Baxter International Inc. confirmed today that it has received a strain of the swine flu virus and is"taking all of the appropriate steps necessary to prepare for a large scale vaccine production," thecompany said in a statement to the Tribune.
The Obama administration has yet to decide whether any large scale manufacturing of dosages iseven necessary or whether any stockpile contracts would even be awarded. But Deerfield-based
Baxter and several other vaccine makers this week are receiving strains of the virus to begin
testing.
"Baxter can confirm that we are working on a vaccine and we have received a strain for testingand evaluation," said Baxter spokesman Christopher Bona. "We need to evaluate the strain."
The task of developing a vaccine begins for Baxter after the strain arrives at its Vienna researchand development labs. The virus arrived via flight from Atlanta, where epidemiologists from the
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been tracking the spread of the virus.
Baxter would not say when its researchers obtained the virus strains.
"It could take three to four weeks to evaluate the growth characteristics of the strain in the vero
cell culture," Bona said in an interview earlier this week.

Ill-based Baxter working on swine flu vaccine« on: April 25, 2009, 11:39:12 PM »________________________________________
Ill-based Baxter working on swine flu vaccine
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2009/04/25/ap6338850.html
Specialty drug maker Baxter International Inc. will work with the World Health Organization todevelop a vaccine that could stem an outbreak of a deadly swine flu strain in Mexico.
Baxter spokesman Christopher Bona said Saturday that the Deerfield, Ill.-based company has
asked the WHO for a sample of the flu strain.

120

He says Baxter has patented technology that allows the company to develop vaccines in a half thetime it usually takes - about 13 weeks instead of 26.
There have been 20 confirmed deaths in Mexico of the swine flu, with nonfatal cases also
confirmed in Kansas and California.
Humans don't have a natural immunity to swine flu strain that emerged in Mexico in March.
Officials have warned the outbreak could become a global epidemic.“
Sanofi Aventis is another pharmaceutical company profitting from the current swine flu
pandemic.
„Just in Time for a North American - Global Pandemic?
So now we have S-P / Merck major Animal Health vaccine manufacturer and sanofi pasteur thenumber one human vaccine manufacturer and BIRMEX a "shadowy" Mexican govermental
company.
Sanofi-aventis invests €100 million in new facility in Mexico
http://www.worldpharmanews.com/content/view/719/30/
Sanofi-aventis invests €100 million in new facility in Mexico
Thursday, 12 March 2009
Sanofi-aventis (EURONEXT: SAN and NYSE: SNY), has announced the signing of anagreement with the Mexican authorities to build a € 100 million facility to manufacture influenza
vaccine in Mexico. The announcement was made during a ceremony attended by Felipe Calderon,President of Mexico, and Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France, who was in Mexico City for a
State visit.
This facility will be built and operated by sanofi pasteur, the vaccines division of sanofi-aventis
Group, which was represented at the ceremony by Chris Viehbacher, Chief Executive Officer ofsanofiaventis.
"By building this new facility, sanofi-aventis is proud to contribute to the strengthening of
Mexico's health infrastructure and is eager to support Mexico's exemplary commitment to publichealth through influenza immunization and pandemic readiness", said Chris Viehbacher. "Thisinvestment illustrates sanofi-aventis' local approach to global health. This facility will benefit
public health in Mexico and the Latin American region, in the context of influenza pandemic
preparedness."
The agreement was signed by Birmex’ (Laboratorio de Biológicos y Reactivos de México) andsanofi-aventis' representatives in the presence of Dr. José Ángel Córdova Villalobos, Minister of
Health of Mexico.
The new influenza vaccine plant will be built in Ocoyoacac, where sanofi-aventis already operates
a facility. The plant will be designed to switch to pandemic vaccine manufacturing if a human
influenza pandemic is declared and a pandemic influenza strain is identified by the World HealthOrganization (WHO).
As the world leader in research, development and manufacturing of influenza vaccines, sanofi
pasteur is working to develop new and improved influenza vaccines to save lives and is actively
involved in pandemic preparedness. Over the last five years, sanofi pasteur has been consistently

121
investing in major expansions of its influenza vaccine production capacity in the United States,
France, China, and now Mexico. With the production of more than 170 million doses of seasonal
influenza vaccine in 2008, sanofi pasteur confirmed its global influenza vaccine market
leadership.

Just how large the profits for companies like Baxter just from producing the vaccine alone andexcluding funding channelled to them by WHO are not clear. However, two Federal Budget
Analysts in Washington, DC, Sharon L. Davis and Mary Palmer, have concluded that drug
companies and pharmacies make 3000 per cent profits on the actual price of active ingredientsused in some of the most popular drugs in America.
„
Celebrex 100 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $130.27 Cost of general active
ingredients: $0.60 Percen t markup: 21,712%
Claritin 10 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $215.17 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.71 Percent markup: 30,306%
Keflex 250 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $157.39 Cost of general active ingredients:$1.88 Percent markup: 8,372%
Lipitor 20 mg Consumer Price (100 tablets): $272.37 Cost of general active ingredients:$5.80 Percent markup: 4,696%
Norvasec 10 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $188.29 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.14 Percent markup: 134,493%
Paxil 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $220.27 Cost of general active ingredients:$7.60 Percent markup: 2,898%
Prevacid 30 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $44.77 Cost of general active ingredients:$1.01 Percent markup: 34,136%
Prilosec 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $360.97 Cost of general active ingredients$0.52 Percent markup: 69,417%
Prozac 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $247.47 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.11 Percent markup: 224,973%
Tenormin 50 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $104.47 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.13 Percent markup: 80,362%
Vasotec 10 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $10237 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.20 Percent markup: 51,185%
Xanax 1 mg Consumer price (100 tablets) : $136.79 Cost of general active ingredients:$0.024 Percent markup: 569,958%
Zestril 20 mg Consumer price (100 tablets) $89.89 Cost of general active ingredients$3.20 Percent markup: 2,809%
Zithromax 600 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $1,482.19 Cost of general active
ingredients: $18.78 Percent markup: 7,892%

122
Zocor 40 mg Consumer price (100 tablets): $350.27 Cost of general active ingredients:$8.63 Percent markup: 4,059%
Zoloft 50 mg Consumer price: $206.87 Cost of general active ingredients: $1.75 Percent
markup: 11 ,821%

Sharon L. Davis, Budget Analyst, US Department of Commerce Room 6839 Office Ph: 202-4824458; Office Fax: 202-482-5480 Email Address: sdavis@docgov
Mary Palmer, Budget Analyst, Bureau of Economic Analysis Office of Budget & Finance;
Voice: (202) 606-929
The news that WHO might declare a pandemic level 6 led to vaccien companies preparing to
make as many as 4.9 billion vaccines against the so-called swine flu, ensuring them gigantic
profits just from the sakes alone.

Today's Top Stories from www.fiercepharma.com
WHO ready to declare phase 6 pandemic<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,bbzs,chbg,4h4n,gyv>
By John Carroll<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,aejj,1hyc,4h4n,gyv#comment>
Comment<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,aejj,1hyc,4h4n,gyv#comment>|<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,4p9p,dxh0,4h4n,gyv>
Forward<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,4p9p,dxh0,4h4n,gyv>
There's widespread expectation that the World Health Organization
will declare a phase 6 pandemic alert this morning--the first suchwarning since 1968.
But you can also expect the WHO's health experts to spend aconsiderable amount of time and effort reassuring the globe that thisis not the deadly viral outbreak that has worried governments forgenerations. And vaccine developers are already well on the way todeveloping new jabs that guard against the new flu.
"It's 24 hours a day," Dr. Giovanni Della Cioppa, head of Global
Clinical Research & Development for Novartis Vaccines, tells
FierceVaccines. "We are working to get this vaccine to the public asquickly as possible."
WHO has been studying a phase 6 alert for weeks as evidence growsthat the swine flu virus has taken hold in countries around the world.
In Australia, there have been 1,000 confirmed cases, offering
considerable data that the virus has extended outside of North

123
America.
"Phase 6, if we call a phase 6, doesn't mean anything concerning
severity, it is concerning geographic spread... Pandemic means global,
but it doesn't have any connotation of severity or mildness," WHOspokesman Gregory Hartl told Reuters.
- read the report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,d17o,6j8y,4h4n,gyv>
from ABC News- read the report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,856,jfku,4h4n,gyv>
from Reuters
ALSO: Canada has created a network of 80 scientists from thecountry's research and health institutions to coordinate their work on
a new vaccine for swine flu. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,cuma,8lob,4h4n,gyv>
Related Articles:
Bloomberg: WHO readies phase 6 pandemic alert<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9uav,kw7j,4h4n,gyv>
Swine flu vaccine business ramps up<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,5ly4,7ea8,4h4n,gyv>
Vax makers in global race to create swine flu jab<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6w22,8x7g,4h4n,gyv>
Read more about: H1N1
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6n96,elcm,4h4n,gyv>, swine flu<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,dhuk,g8ek,4h4n,gyv>, Vaccine<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,ks8b,3xm5,4h4n,gyv>, pandemic flu<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2dhh,4gda,4h4n,gyv><http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,lgbj,65js,4h4n,gyv><http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,7155,jfrc,4h4n,gyv>
6 Key Imperatives for Pharmaceutical Alliance Management Functions Tuesday, June 16th, 1 pm ET / 10 am PT
This webinar focuses on where Alliance Management in Pharmaceuticalorganizations needs to go in 2009 and 2010. Learn the six crucial
elements to consider as you work to enhance your value proposition,
have impact on alliance success, and help your company deal with thesechallenging times. Register Today!

124<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,lgbj,65js,4h4n,gyv>
Four big vax makers ready H1N1 jabs
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,fd0m,af61,4h4n,gyv>
By John Carroll<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,b8rd,2itq,4h4n,gyv#comment>
Comment<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,b8rd,2itq,4h4n,gyv#comment>|<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,3z61,km8,4h4n,gyv>
Forward<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,3z61,km8,4h4n,gyv>
Vaccine teams for four of the world's largest vaccine manufacturers
say they have the seed stock they need to develop a new swine flu vax
for use this autumn. But the researchers add that they're still
uncertain just how much of the growing demand for the vaccine can bemet.
"It will probably take a couple of weeks to ascertain the yields
before we get into large-scale manufacture," a Glaxo spokesman told
Reuters. Teams for GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis andSolvay all say they're at work on a new H1N1 jab, but they need todetermine how well the strain they're working with will grow in a
manufacturing setting before they can calculate yields.
All these vaccine manufacturers could reap windfall profits from aburst of new orders for the new flu vaccine. Developed countries havealready started to ink contracts. And the manufacturers will be able
to shift from seasonal flu vaccines to the H1N1 vax as they deploy a
new array of resources built in recent years to improve on the world's
supply of vaccines.
- read the report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,q2f,hroq,4h4n,gyv>
from Reuters
Related Article:
Novavax shares soar on NIH swine flu agreement<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,4wka,29cf,4h4n,gyv>
Glaxo expects vax orders to spike as WHO outlines deadlines<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,fx2l,j1bc,4h4n,gyv>
UK ordering up new flu vax stockpile<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,a887,g8d8,4h4n,gyv>
Novartis readies key adjuvant for swine flu use<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,kl6c,dutc,4h4n,gyv>
Read more about: Sanofi-Aventis

125<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2g50,k3xg,4h4n,gyv>, GlaxoSmithKline<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,4dxa,bgku,4h4n,gyv>, Vaccine<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,ks8b,3xm5,4h4n,gyv>, manufacturing<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,jjxm,m3jp,4h4n,gyv>
Novartis teams up on master's program<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2bdk,i97g,4h4n,gyv>
By John Carroll<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,1yhm,21aj,4h4n,gyv#comment>
Comment<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,1yhm,21aj,4h4n,gyv#comment>|<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9xzj,lm1b,4h4n,gyv>
Forward<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9xzj,lm1b,4h4n,gyv>
Looking to cultivate some expert assistance for on-the-ground
vaccine research work, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics is partneringwith the University of Siena to offer a unique, two-year Masters
program covering the clinical development of vaccines for a group of
doctors from developing countries. Novartis will bring its scientificknow-how to the class, which will largely be made up of doctors fromAfrican and Asian countries.
"The best place to develop a vaccine for developing countries is thedeveloping country," Dr. Giovanni Della Cioppa, head of Global
Clinical Research & Development for Novartis Vaccines, tells
FierceVaccines. Key factors like engineering a vaccine's resistance tohigh temperatures and use of local storage facilities would be built
into the research programs, pushing the researchers to come up withtreatments that are ideal for that environment. And these new experts
on vaccine development will be free to work with any developers.
"For all of those interested in big-scale clinical research,creating new centers of excellence outside of the normal, very
expensive environment of North America and Europe would be of greatinterest," says Dr. Cioppa, who's been thinking about setting up a
program like this for the past decade.
"Clinical research and development of vaccines, along withimmunology, infectivology and biostatistics, are some of the core
subjects that will be addressed during the program," explains
Professor Ranuccio Nuti, coordinator of the Technical-ScientificCommittee. "Our aim is to provide these medical professionals with theknowledge necessary to meet the demands arising in the area ofneglected diseases as well as to prepare them to react proactively tosituations such as the recent outbreak of the H1N1 virus in Mexico."
The first year of the program will cover immunology, infectivology,

126
methodology of clinical research, pharmacovigilance, biostatistics,
clinical data management and vaccine production. The second year of
the course will focus on applying the skills acquired during the
program in vaccine research and development programs.
- read the press release<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,l1vg,8qei,4h4n,gyv>
Read more about: university partnership<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,gzya,cqag,4h4n,gyv>, Novartis<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,hhjp,dgzb,4h4n,gyv>
GlaxoSmithKline unveils $600M vaccine plant<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,grl,iqct,4h4n,gyv>
By John Carroll<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9qzx,4zxt,4h4n,gyv#comment>
Comment<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9qzx,4zxt,4h4n,gyv#comment>|<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6rxd,4d96,4h4n,gyv>
Forward<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6rxd,4d96,4h4n,gyv>
GlaxoSmithKline has taken the wraps off its new, $600 million
vaccine manufacturing plant in Singapore, which will produce jabs fora range of childhood diseases such as meningitis, pneumonia and blood
poisoning. And the opening ceremony featured plenty of boasting. Glaxo
chief Andrew Witty called the plant "possibly the best vaccine
facility anywhere in the world."
Finishing the plant and getting started actually producing advanced
vaccines, though, are two different things. Production work will only
begin in 2011, giving regulators from the FDA and the World HealthOrganization time to inspect the facility. Glaxo used the opening day
ceremony to announce a $30 million fund to endow graduate studies inmanufacturing processes, green chemistry and health policies.
Singapore has pushed hard to expand its biopharma industry and anumber of multinationals have set up operations in the city-state. And
GlaxoSmithKline has been a big supporter. The pharma giant has been
rapidly building its global vaccine business, which was on display
earlier this week with the announcement that GSK is investing $34
million into a new joint venture<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,h66o,5yna,4h4n,gyv>
to produce vaccines in China.
- read the report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6un9,am25,4h4n,gyv>
from the Straits Times
Related Articles:

127

GSK unveils $300M vax facility for U.S. market push<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,loty,9k5d,4h4n,gyv>
Glaxo makes $34M leap into Chinese vaccine market<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,h66o,5yna,4h4n,gyv>
GSK kickstarts global trial for seasonal flu vax<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,ll0h,4rb4,4h4n,gyv>
Read more about: vaccine plant<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,1dv7,m8d9,4h4n,gyv>, GlaxoSmithKline<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,4dxa,bgku,4h4n,gyv>, Singapore<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2ggc,gy7o,4h4n,gyv><http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2x,9uq8,4h4n,gyv>
Join Fierce & Adobe @ DIA for a Free Networking Event. RSVP Today<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,2x,9uq8,4h4n,gyv>
Vaccine Market
Just how far does the vaccine shield law go? The U.S. Supreme Court
wants to know. It's eyeing a Georgia Supreme Court ruling that allowed
a liability suit over vaccines made by Wyeth and GlaxoSmithKline. The
drugmakers want the Supremes to review that ruling; in their view, the1986 vaccine shield law should have precluded the suit. But theGeorgia high court said the 1986 law, while protecting vaccine makers
from frivolous suits, doesn't prevent claims that they should haveused a safer vaccine formula. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,ch9x,6o0s,4h4n,gyv>
Emergent BioSolutions has won a $30 million payment from the federal
government on the FDA's decision to extend the shelf life of its
anthrax vaccine from three years to four years. The news boosted
Emergent's stock price by 11 percent. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,9r94,5lg6,4h4n,gyv>
The FDA has strengthened its warning on Gardasil after hearing newreports of injuries sustained by patients who faint after getting thejab. Recipients will need to stay seated or lying down and observedfor 15 minutes. Story<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,l9bk,av3y,4h4n,gyv>
The World Health Organization is urging that all children be
vaccinated against rotavirus, a disease that kills more than half amillion children each year. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,8bs0,6p6y,4h4n,gyv>
Vaccine Research128
Vical has lost money for two decades, but the vaccine developer says
it's DNA-based vaccines are now "ready for prime time." Story<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,cxi1,7vs7,4h4n,gyv>
Researchers at Boston University School of Medicine have found how
the bacteria responsible for traveler's diarrhea binds to the host's
intestines, offering some key insights that will help develop a more
effective vaccine for the ailment. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,gh91,57yf,4h4n,gyv>
The Associated Press and the Washington Post looked at new efforts
to create a new malaria vaccine along with mutant mosquitoes which areresistant to malaria. Report<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,53tj,ifbd,4h4n,gyv>
New data from Phase III European clinical trials reinforce that
Wyeth's Prevenar 13 has the potential to guard against the 13 mostprevalent serotypes associated with pneumococcal disease. Release<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,5dbt,a2h7,4h4n,gyv>
Webinars
Register Today!
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,6eb8,bcr7,4h4n,gyv>
EventsRegister today!
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,ctty,ducb,4h4n,gyv>
Register today<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,h80m,chsg,4h4n,gyv>!
Marketplace
Click here.
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,jpc7,hp8q,4h4n,gyv>
opengenomics.com/pcr<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,a25d,463n,4h4n,gyv>.
Jobs
Learn more.
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,1sfb,ggzy,4h4n,gyv>
Learn more.
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,hnws,gy9u,4h4n,gyv>
http://www.fiercepharma.com/jobs<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,f3uk,k4am,4h4n,gyv>.
FierceVaccines is a weekly update on the vaccine industry. Sign up<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,5i72,a7y,4h4n,gyv>
or learn more

129
<http://www.uptilt.com/c.html?rtr=on&s=69l,176sg,29k4,jowv,emof,4h4n,gyv>
today.
XXIX.Evidence that the swine flu vaccine is planned to cause harm: Inclusion of adjuvants

Dr Ann Schuchat and Dr Tom Friedman said at CDC press conference -http://www.cdc.gov/media/transcripts/2009/t090611.htm-- that adjuvants would be included in
the vaccine.
Squalene is an example of an organic adjuvant commonly used and has been blamed for some of
the tragic effects of the smallpox vaccine administered to Gulf War vets who developed the socalled Gulf War Syndrome, which should be called the Fort Detrick Syndrome.
Adjuvants activate the pathogenes within a vaccine.
„In immunology, an adjuvant is an agent that may stimulate the immune system and increase theresponse to a vaccine, without having any specific antigenic effect in itself.[1]The word
“adjuvant” comes from the Latin word adjuvare, meaning to help or aid.[2]"An immunologic
adjuvant is defined as any substance that acts to accelerate, prolong, or enhance antigen-specificimmune responses when used in combination with specific vaccine antigens."[3]Adjuvants have been called the dirty little secret of vaccines [4] in the scientific community,
because much about how adjuvants work is a mystery. Known adjuvants include oils, aluminum
salts, and virosomes.“ (Wikipeida)„Anne Schuchat:Our HHS Secretary Sebelius announced May 22nd that nearly $1 billion wasgoing towards vaccine development and manufacturing. That included resources for the clinical
trials that are being carried out through NIH and through the manufacturers in collaboration, ofcourse, with the FDA and with the part of HHS that works on these pandemic matters. It also
included resources to assure manufacturing capacity for both antigen, the component of thevaccine that gives you that immuno response, and the additional chemical that can sometimes
increase the immune response that's more specific to the antigen. So the actual amounts -- or I
can give you dollar figures rather than not ghost information -- there are five different
manufacturers that the HHS has contracted with and there's been a procurement order for a total of$650 million worth of antigen, and $287 million worth of adjuvant. It is posh to say there are a lotof steps important in the clinical development of a vaccine and the testing and we can't predict
today how much antigen would be needed. For the H1N1 vaccine we need a lot of antigen to get
the response but with adjuvant you could get a different response. We need to be able tomanufacture vaccine in case there is decision to use vaccine we have it on hand. Even if thedecision to use vaccine is not made, these orders permit the chemicals to be stored in bulk where
they could later be formulated if they needed to be. We've done this in a way that's giving us a lotof options for the future.
Glen Nowak: Thank you, Anne.
Operator: Our next question comes from Alice Park with Time Magazine. Ma'am, your line is
open.
Alice Park: Yes, this is also a question about vaccines for either Dr. Schuchat or Dr. Frieden. At
this point do we have any better information for how well this vaccine is going to be matched towhatever strain we might be in the fall, and how quickly would we be able to adjust this vaccine if
we were to see a slightly different variant of this H1N1 become more prevalent in the fall?
Glen Nowak: I'll have Dr. Schuchat answer that question.
Anne Schuchat:The good news so far is we have tested a number of isolates from around theworld, including different countries and many different states here in the U.S. Characteristics ofthe virus are the same, suggesting that the strains that are being used for vaccine development arematching the strains that are continuing to circulate. But with influenza, we need to keep looking.

130
So we'll be testing strains through the course of the weeks and months ahead and learn more fromthat about whether whatever may circulate here in the fall or winter is still the same as what has
been circulating so far. So at this point we have no reason to think that the strains that are being
used to develop vaccines have any kind of diversion from what's circulating. Now, of course
you've asked the question about how well will this work. That's the million dollar question
because we don't know yet. We're going to need to do those clinical studies to see whether avaccine that's developed gives a good immune reaction in different people, whether vaccine withor without adjuvant and whether there are different doses people need to get a good response.
Those are studies we'll carry out over the next several months and we'll look forward to seeing
results from them.“
There are reports that the flu vaccine contains squalene oil as an adjuvant.
Flu vaccine contains squalene oil as an adjuvant.
Micropaleontologist Dr. Viera Scheibner conducted research into the adverse effects of adjuvantsin vaccines and wrote: [3] Squalene “contributed to the cascade of reactions called “ Gulf War
syndrome. GIs developed arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes,
malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skinlesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes,
neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte
sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, deadly Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon with paroxysms of lack of blood in fingers and toes infingers and toes, Sjorgren’s syndrome with blurred vision, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and lowgrade fever.”[4] Wikipedia A [5] study linking squalene, as experimental vaccine adjuvant, to individuals
with the clinical signs of Gulf War syndrome was published in 2002. A U.S. Federal Judge ruledthat there was good cause to believe aqualene to be harmful, and he ordered the Pentagon to stop
administering it in October 2004.

XXX. Conclusion

There is evidence that there is an international criminal corporate crime syndicate, directed by agroup called the Illuminati, are planning the mass murder of the people of the USA by using an
artificial virus as a pretext to deliver a toxic vaccinations.
There is clear, unambiguous evidence that Baxter is affiliated with this group and deliberately
released 72 kilos of pandemic material in February in Austria to trigger a pandemic in order tojustify a pandemic declaration level 6 by WHO and mass vaccinations.
There is evidence members of the same group were involved in engineering and releasing the“swine flu” virus in Mexico to allow WHO to declare pandemic level 6 on June 11th.
The same complex of international pharmaceutical companies and international government
agencies that have developed and released pandemic material have positioned themselves to profit
from triggering the pandemic by sealing contracts to supply the vaccine.

131
There are reasonable grounds for believing that the mandatory vaccines will be purposelycontaminated with diseases that are specifically designed to cause death.
A fully licensed Novartis bird flu vaccine has killed at least 21 homeless people in Poland in thesummer of 2008 and had as its “primary outcome measure”, an “adverse events rate”, thereby
meeting the US government’s own definition of a bioweapon (a biological agent designed to cause
an adverse events rate, i.e. death or injury) with a delivery system (injection).
The nature and intent of these pandemic viruses and forced inoculation is to drastically reduce theworld’s population, something that the financial and political elite believe will offer them the best
chance of surviving in an environmentally stressed era while maintaining their revenue from oil
and gas. A switch to solar, wind and geothermal energy, for example, would relieve pressure on
the environment but destroy their profit base.
Furthermore, their control of organisations such as WHO, the UN and the Federal Reserve willallow them to consolidate their power in a “New World Order” as they refer to their own project
for world domination by them.
To sum up: the pandemic flu vaccine is a) classed as a “bioweapon” according to the US
government’s own documents (see Attachment 1), b) the vaccine companies tasked withproducing the vaccine have been involved in the activities of the type typical of bioweapons,
including developing weapnized viruses, releasing them into the general public, in deliberatecontamination of vaccines resulting in death and injury and designing trials of vaccine to cause
death and injury and there is a high probability the vaccines will be cause injury or death, and c)
the government is acting unconstituutionally and illegally in compelling them to take an injectionof a substance classified as bioweapon d) in criminalising a refusal, and e) in waiving people’s
right to claim compensation in the event of injury or damage, and f) by misusing the US
population as “vectors” to spread the pandemic because the act of mass vaccination, that is to say,of forced injections of of toxins under guise of offering prophylactic treatment is the very process
by which the virus will be able to mutate and release a fully weaponized virus.

132
XXXI. Defendants
The main defendants are:

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE
20500 Washington, D.C.
DAVID NABARROUNITED NATIONS
760 United Nations Plaza,
New York, NY 10017
DR. MARGARET CHAN
WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION
Avenue Appia 20
1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland
KATHLEEN SIBELIUS
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201,
JANET NAPOLITANODEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, D.C. 20301
DR. MARGARET HAMBURG
COMMISSIONER
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
5600 Fishers Lane
Rockville, Maryland 20857-0001
ROBERT PARKINSON
CEO, BAXTER INT.,
Baxter International, headquartered in Deerfield, IL, USA
DANIEL VASSELLA
CEO, NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL AG
CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
CHRIS VIEHBACHERCEO SANOFI AVENTIS
160-180, avenue de France, 75008 Paris
France133
ANDREW WITTYCEO GSK PLC
One Franklin Plaza
Philadelphia PA 19101
RAHUL SINGHVICEO NOVAVAX
9920 Belward Campus DriveRockville, MD 20850
DAVID DE ROTHSCHILD
Managing Partner,
Rothschild & Cie BanqueRothschild Inc, 1251 Avenue of the Americas
51st floor, NY 10020
DAVID ROCKEFELLER
Honorary North American Chairman
TRILATERAL COMMISSION
1156 Fifteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005
GEORGE W. BUSH
10141 Daria Place
Dallas, TX 75229
GEORGE SOROS
Chairman of Soros Fund Management, LLC
888 7th Ave., 33rd Fl. New York, NY 10106
WILLIAM HENRY GATES III
BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATIONPO Box 23350, Seattle, WA 98102
Michael O. Leavitt
Former Secretary of Health and Human Services (2005-2009)
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
Jeffrey Taubenberger,
NAID-Intramural branch6610 Rockledge Drive, Room 4017, MSC 6606
Bethesda, MD 20892-6606
James Robertson
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
Blanche Lane
South Mimms
Potters Bar
Hertfordshire
EN6 3QG
Ruben O. Donis
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

134
Mailstop E-03 1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta, Georgia 30333
United States
Rick A. BrightCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
Mailstop E-03 1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta, Georgia 30333
United States
The above defendants have given support in the form of funds, logistics, skills, licences and coverto the covert programme of mass genocide using an artificial virus and mass vaccination with
toxic vaccines.
Speicifically, Defendant President Barack Obama, who as part of his Office, will oversee theimplementation of the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, which would
give primacy to the World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nations over US law andgovernment agencies in the event of a pandemic being declared. President Obama has also
requested a $1.5 billion emergency appropriation to deal with swine flu, including development ofa vaccine.
Defandant David Nabarro, who as Senior U.N. system influenza coordinator will implement an
emergency response plan in the event of a declared pandemic on US territoriy operating throughauthorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.N. Food andAgriculture Organization, and taking precedence over US government agencies and law.
4. Defandant WHO, the organisation responsible for coordinating the global response, including
the US response, to the „swine flu“ and other pandemics.
Defendant HHS is in the process of working with vaccine manufacturers to facilitate productionof pilot vaccine lots for both H5N1 and H9N2 strains as well as contracting for the manufacturingof H5N1 vaccine. The HHS recently awarded contracts to Novartis AG worth $289 million;
Sanofi Aventis SA for $191 million, and GlaxoSmithKline PLC for $181 million to produce
H1N1 vaccine ingredients. HHS said it is also talking to additional manufacturers to find morecapacity.
Defendant DHS has prepared pandemic flu guidelines, including the National Strategy To
Safeguard Against The Danger Of Pandemic Influenza (White House) and will coordinate
between government officials and the public health, medical, veterinary, and law enforcement
communities, as well as the private sector in the event of a declared pandemic.
Defendant Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) through its agent, Defendant Foodand Drug Administration (“FDA”), is the federal agency responsible for licensing and quality
control of drugs and biologic products, such as „swine flu“ and other pandemic vaccines.
The FDA is responsible for promulgating federal regulations that describe what makes a drug or
vaccine an “IND” and how a drug is placed in IND status.

Defendant Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt introduced a new FDA rules in January
2006 that pre-empted any state laws that allow citizens to sue drugmakers for producing unsafe
drugs under the dubious claim that the FDA, an agency under HHS, had national responsibility forcertification of drug safety and state lawsuits impinged on that national responsibility.