SEIZURE
By Craig Paardekooper

The VAERS Data for COVID19 Monovalent and COVID19 Bivalent

So there are a large number of reported cases of seizures following COVID19 vaccine.

SAFETY ALARMS
ALARM 1 : EXCESSIVE INCIDENCE :Any vaccine with an excessive incidence of this adverse effect will have a proportional reporting
ratio greater than 1.

ALARM 2 : HIGHLY EXCESSIVE INCIDENCE :A PRR ratio greater than 2 means seizures are occurring with more than twice the frequency
compared to the other vaccines.

ALARM 3 : EXTREME INCIDENCE : LOWER CONFIDENCE INTERVAL OF PRR STILL EXCEEDS 2
The 95% confidence interval of the PRR is the range within which it can vary. If the lower limit ofthis range still exceeds 2, then we are looking at a very strong safety signal.

MEASURES OF RELATIVE INCIDENCE OF SEIZURE WITH COVID
VACCINES
Here are the Proportional Reporting Ratios for each symptom of seizure. If the value is greaterthan 1, then there is an excessive incidence. If the value is greater than 2, then the vaccine has
more than double the incidence compared to other vaccines.

The monovalent COVID vaccine has high PRR scores for “generalized non-motor seizure”, “focaldyscognitive seizure” and “neonatal seizure”
The bivalent COVID vaccine has a high PRR score for autonomic seizure.

ARE THESE RESULTS SIGNIFICANT ?
The following tables show the lower confidence interval of the PRR (95% confidence interval)

From these tables it can be seen that for HPV vaccine, Meningitis vaccine and DTAP vaccine thelower limit of the confidence interval far exceeds 2. So these vaccines generate very strong
safety signals for seizure.
In comparison COVID vaccines are associated with an elevated risk of seizure, but it does notconstitute a safety signal. (for a safety signal, the lower confidence interval must exceed 2)

EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONIs there a “seizure” effect? A study was carried out by the FDA to find out –What did they find ?

So the FDA has observed an elevated incidence of seizures following COVID vaccination.
Seizures immediately after COVID vaccination (within 24 hours) occurred with three times theincidence compared to seizures later on (within 63 days). So there is definitely a seizure effect.
Note, here the researchers are NOT comparing incidence WITHOUT the vaccine to incidence
WITH a vaccine. Rather they are comparing immediate incidence WITH the vaccine to later
incidence WITH the vaccine. Even then, the immediate incidence is 3 times higher than thelater incidence.
One wonders what the increase in rate of febrile seizure is when a control group of unvaccinatedchildren is compared to the vaccinated children.

As we have seen from the previous VAERS tables, the incidence of seizures is elevated by about
24% compared to the average for the other 99 vaccines. The injection of a large % of the US
population with this vaccine has therefore led to a correspondingly large number of reports ofseizure - 10,633 reported instances. While this is not as bad as the horrendous rates with HPV,MEN and DTAP vaccines, it is still a concern, since it maybe only one symptom of underlying
brain damage incurred.

The researchers conclude that the safety profile remains “favorable”. “Favorable” is of course asubjective term. Was it regarded as “favorable” by the 10,633 people who reported seizures tothe VAERS system?

We can agree with the FDA that there is an injurious seizure effect, and we can add that it raises
the risk of seizure by about 24% compared to other vaccines.
Though this increased risk is small compared to the risks with other vaccines such as DTAP andHPV, unfortunately when applied to a large population, the result is many injuries.
If 10,633 reports of seizure occurred in the US with 300 million people injected with the COVID
jab, then how many reports of seizure might we expect from a global program where 5 billion
people were injected?
You can find this study here – https://howbad.info/seizurefda.pdf