Nation-o-cide : Inducing disability for depopulation and control in select European nations
by Craig Paardekooper
In this article I look at the data on the 10 most toxic lots distributed to each country. Data can be viewed here Batch Codes of Coronavirus 2019 Vaccines (knollfrank.github.io). Simply choose the country name, then order byseverity.
8 countries in Europe show a much higher frequency of disability compared to death following vaccination.
Belgium – excess disability

Denmark – excess disability

Ireland – excess disability

Italy – excess disability

Norway – excess disability

Portugal – excess disability

Sweden – excess disability

United Kingdom – excess disability

In the above countries you can see that disabilities outnumber deaths following vaccination. The ratio of disability todeath for the 10 most toxic lots for the UK is given in the last column in the table below. You can see that for all of
the lots shown, the number of disabled is at least twice the number dying after vaccination. For some lots it rises to
60 x the number !!

However other countries in Europe show an absence of this excess, and an inverse of the death : disability ratio.
Germany

Austria

FranceAs you can see, the ratio of disability to death is “flipped” in these countries, so now death outnumbers disability.
This suggests that qualitatively different lots may have been distributed to different countries. Why else would theratio of death to disability be•••

12 : 1 for some lots in Germany,
1 : 60 for some lots in the UK
1 : 186 for some lots in Belgium

The death : disability ratio is completely flipped.

United States
In the USA, you can see that death outnumbers disability for the 10 most toxic batches

The top 10 most toxic lots in the USA show higher deaths compared to disabilities – a complete flip of theastronomical ratios found in Europe where some lots have death: disability of 1 : 186 .

Why are some countries showing such excess disability?
Intention to Harm
It is easy to forget that world governments have demonstrated a strong intention to ignore safety signals arisingfrom vaccine adverse reactions, and have made a concerted effort to censor and suppress this information, whilst
simultaneously mandating and coercing vaccine uptake.
Legally required safety studies have been routinely neglected by regulators. Human rights have been violated andconstitutional laws have been broken when coercion has been used to pressure citizens against their free will into
taking an untested, gene therapy. The obvious conclusion is that governments are acting illegally, without regard tosafety, and without regard to the rights and needs of their populations. Their manifest intention is to harm.
So when we ask why disability has sky-rocketed in select nations, we should look to government intention for theanswer.
So What are the Effects
In Europe 70 + % have been vaccinated. Consequently, those nations where the vaccine is inducing disability will
have a large population of people incapable of work.
Public health care will not be able to manage with the influx of people requiring care, and the social security system
will not be able to pay out to such a large % of the population. People will have to rely on private health care paid forout of their own savings. The long term suffering and chronic pain occasioned by the vaccine induced disabilities will
easily persuade the vast afflicted masses to part with their savings and their assets in order to obtain temporary
relief.
Those without savings will die unless they are cared for by their extended family.
If 70% of the workforce is disabled, then productivity will collapse and most essential services will cease. It will be anation of dependents – unable to produce, only to consume. More able-bodied nations will have to step in to carryout essential services – effectively taking over the country.

Profit and Control“You will be happy and own nothing” is only half true.
All of the countries showing excess disability are wealthy, and so they are able to afford long term care. Payment forthat care would transfer considerable wealth to pharma. In addition it would make the disabled nations very
dependent upon able-bodied nations for imports of products and services. Nations like the United Kingdom would
no longer be able to assert their independence from Europe, since they will be wholly dependent on Europe forsurvival. But a disabled nation can only import products and services while their savings last. Once the money runsout then the nation dies. Loaning money is not an option, since a nation that is almost completely disabled is unable
to pay back.
In fact, the economic collapse resulting from a disabled work force will inevitably lead to a wholesale take-over of
their land and country by foreign, able-bodies nations. If everyone is disabled and requiring care, the people will
actually ask to be taken over so some services can resume.

Don’t They Need Us?
Not all countries might be deemed necessary for labor and production in a hypothetical new world order. Those
deemed expendable can be disabled and transformed into nations of unproductive consumers to be milked for theirwealth until their country itself is subsumed by foreign powers.

So you can see how generating a large population of disabled is a way of –•••Making a huge amount of money for pharma
Depopulating that country in a less overt manner than immediate death
Breaking the independence of that country – by increasing its dependence on other nations for services

For further information please see –International Deadly Lots (howbadismybatch.com)
Geographical Differences (howbadismybatch.com)