Overseas Fieldwork Report 2013:

Siem Reap Province, Cambodia

Graduate School of International Development
Nagoya University

Introduction
The twenty-first Overseas Fieldwork (OFW 2013) of the Graduate School of International Development(GSID), Nagoya University, was carried out in Siem Reap Province, Cambodia, from September 15 to
September 30, 2013. The OFW is an important part of GSID’s curriculum, designed to provide students with
exposure to the “real world” development issues in rural areas of a developing country and an opportunity todevelop field-based research skills in a group setting. Each year, GSID carries out the OFW in an Asiandeveloping country in cooperation with GSID’s local partner university. This year, the Royal University ofPhnom Penh (RUPP) kindly accepted to host the OFW, adding to the successful collaboration extended for the
past OFWs in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2012. Building on many years of cherished relationships between the two
universities, the OFW 2013 was managed smoothly and it contributed to further strengthening GSID’s ties foracademic exchange and collaboration with this prestigious university in Cambodia.
Considering the relevance of topics to Siem Reap’s local developmental context, we divided 33 graduate
students into four thematic working groups: Community Development (WG1), Education (WG2), Migration(WG3), and Tourism (WG4), to study and observe various dimensions of rural development in that area in aholistic manner. Students conducted their research in villages of Ta Yaek Commune and Nokor Thom
Commune, Siem Reap Province. On September 27, before the departure from Phnom Penh, they presented theirpreliminary research findings at RUPP, to share them with, and receive feedback from, the RUPP faculty andstudents.
Reflecting comments and advice received at the presentation and in the course of their fieldwork,
participants tried to elaborate their analysis in the final report. This volume is a collection of the working
groups’ reports.

Acknowledgements
The committee of OFW 2013 is indebted to many people and institutions both in Cambodia and Japan forthe successful completion of this year’s program.
Our appreciation must be directed first to the people of Ta Yaek Commune and Nokor Thom in Siem Reap
Province. We are especially grateful to local authorities including the provincial governor, Mr. Khim Bun Song,village chiefs, staff members of government offices and other relevant organizations for their generous
assistance and cordial hospitality. We also would like to express our sincere gratitude to all those who kindly
provided us with precious information during interviews. We could not have accomplished the OFW
successfully without their kind support.
iNext, our appreciation goes to faculty and students of the Royal University of Phnom Penh (RUPP). We
would like to express our sincere appreciation to the RUPP faculty, Prof. Ngin Chanrith, Prof. Men Prach Vuthy,
Prof. Heng Naret, Prof. Kim Veara, and Prof. Yin Sorya. Participants of the OFW 2013 received tremendous
support from them and their students during the field research.

This year’s OFW was sponsored by the

program on “Training a New Generation of Leaders in International Cooperation for the Development of theASEAN Region,” which GSID has been implementing under ”the Re-Inventing Japan Project (Support for theFormation of Collaborative Programs with ASEAN Universities: “Campus ASEAN Program”) of Japan’s
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). As part of this “Campus ASEAN”
program, we also held an international seminar on “Cambodia’s Contemporary Socio-economic Challenges:
National and Regional Perspectives,” jointly with the RUPP and the Royal University of Law and Economics(RULE), at RULE on Sep. 28, 2013. This joint international seminar was very successful, bringing many experts
and eminent speakers from Cambodia to discuss current challenges that Cambodia faces to promote its
sustainable development. Our special thanks goes to the Royal University of Law and Economics, especiallyProf. Phalthy Hap, for his superb arrangement and commitment to make it a success.
Last but not least, we are very grateful to those who provided valuable lectures to our participants in the
preparatory seminars for the OFW 2013: Dr. Koung Teilee, Associate Professor, the Graduate School of Law,
Nagoya University, Dr. Satoru Kobayashi, Associate Professor, Kyoto University, and Dr. Yukiko Yonekura,
Associate Professor, Showa Women’s University. We also would like to thank Ms. Erin Sakakibara for the
English editing of this volume.

Committee on OFW 2013
Aya Okada, Professor and Chair
Wataru Kusaka, Associate Professor
Itsuko Fujimura, Professor

Collaborating faculty member
Tetsuo Umemura, Professor

Office of OFW
Ngov Penghuy, Assistant Professorii

Table of Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... i
Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ i
Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................iii
List of Participants .......................................................................................................................... 1
Preparatory Seminar ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Interim Presentation of Research Findings in Cambodia .................................................................................... 3
Presentation of Research Findings in GSID ........................................................................................................ 3
Overall Schedule for Fieldwork in Cambodia ..................................................................................................... 4

Background Information of Siem Reap Province, Cambodia......................................................... 5

Working Group 1
The Role of Community Finance in Cambodia Focusing on the Relationship between
Community Finance and Investment ………………………………………...………………... 9
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 10
2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 15
3. Findings ......................................................................................................................................................... 17
4. Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 22
5. Conclusion..................................................................................................................................................... 24
6. Acknowledgment .......................................................................................................................................... 25
7. References ..................................................................................................................................................... 26

Working Group 2
Lower Secondary School Education in Cambodia Focusing on Factors that Influence
Students’ Attendance: The Case of Siem Reap Province ………...……………………….… 27
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 28
2. Research Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 30
3. Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................... 32
4. Findings and Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 35
5. Conclusion..................................................................................................................................................... 45iii

6. Acknowledgement......................................................................................................................................... 45
7. Reference ..................................................................................................................................................... 46

Working Group 3
The Paradox of the “Thailand Dream”: Understanding Migration from the Perspective of
Rural Women in Cambodia …………………………………………………………....………47
1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 48
2. Problem Statement ........................................................................................................................................ 49
3. Significance of the Study .............................................................................................................................. 49
4. Research Objective and Research Question .................................................................................................. 49
5. Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 50
6. Findings ....................................................................................................................................................... 51
7. Analysis ....................................................................................................................................................... 56
8. Conclusion..................................................................................................................................................... 58
9. References ..................................................................................................................................................... 59
Appendix ........................................................................................................................................................... 60

Working Group 4Contribution of Souvenir Business in Siem Reap Community: Income, Employment andLiving Conditions …………………………………………………………………………….…68
1. Background .................................................................................................................................................. 70
2. Literature Review .......................................................................................................................................... 71
3. Scope and Limitation .................................................................................................................................. 72
4. Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 73
5. Conceptual Framework and Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 76
6. Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 76
7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 88
8. Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................... 90
9. Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 93
10. References ................................................................................................................................................. 93

List of Individual and Company Donors to the Overseas Fieldwork Fund .......................................................... 94
海外実地研修基金に拠出いただいた個人・企業一覧............................................................................................................................................................................... 95iv

List of Participants
Faculty Members (9)Working Groups

Advisors from
GSID, Nagoya University

Advisors from
Cambodia

WG1

Aya OkadaHeng Naret

WG2

Itsuko Fujimura

Kim Veara

WG3

Wataru Kusaka

Yin Sorya

WG4

Tetsuo Umemura

Men Prach Vuthy

Logistics/Coordination

Penghuy Ngov

Student Interpreters from Royal University of Phnom Penh (8)
WG

Name

Sex

Keo Morokoth

WG

M

WG1

Name

Sex

Prak Solida

F

Sen RinethF

Lim Muyhong

F

Khourn SreyrathF

WG3
Seakchhy Monyrath

M

Cheb Hoeurn

M

WG2

WG4
Kong Sopheak

M

GSID Students (33)No.

WG1Community
Development
(8 人)

WG2
Education
(8 人)

Name

Sex

Dept

Nationality

1

CHIAKI HOJO

F

DICOS

Japanese

2

ROKONUZZAMAN MOHAMMED

M

DICOS

Bangladeshi

3

SOTO MURILLO ANTONIOLEONARDO

M

DID

Bolivian

4

JISOO JEON

F

DICOS

Korean5

AI KONNOF

DICOSJapanese

6

ISSIFU IBRAHIM

M

DID

Ghanaian

7

DING YAN

F

DID

Chinese8

TANVEER IQBAL

M

DID

Pakistani

9

HANCCO CHOQUE LEONIDAS

M

DID

Peruvian

10

KAI NAKAMURA

M

DICOS

Japanese

11

LAN CHENGLU

F

DID

Chinese

*
**

1

Group
Advisor

Prof.
Okada

Prof.
Fujimura

WG3
Migration
(8 人)

WG4
Tourism(9 人)

12

ZHANG YUF

DID

Chinese13

NATSUKI KONDO

F

DIDJapanese

14

MIKA HATTORI VERMEULEN

F

DICOM

Japanese

15

KOSUKE UEDA

*

M

DID

Japanese

16

SHUHEI SUGIMORI

M

DID

Japanese

17

MARIKO MAKITA

F

DICOS

Japanese

18

DAYTOC HERMINIGILDO LARIOSA

M

DID

Filipino

19

NONG MONIN

M

DID

Cambodian

20

RUSTIA MARIE DOMINIQUE

F

DID

Filipino

21

CHO MAR NAING

F

DICOS

Myanmese22

LE THI HUYEN

F

DID

Vietnamese

23

OJEDA ECHEUERRIA JOSE
MAURICIOM

DICOS

Mexican24

AMI KATOF

DICOSJapanese25

VELASCO THEODORE MAGGAY

M

DID

Filipino

26

UDDIN MD. SALAH

M

DID

Bangladeshi

27

CHEA RYDA

F

DID

Cambodian28

SHIVA RAM KHADKA

M

DID

Nepali29

WANG XIAO JINGF

DID

Chinese30

NAOTUNNA PALLIYAGE RAVINDRA
DEYSHAPPRIYA **M

DID

Srilankan

31

SUN JIE

F

DID

Chinese32

FARAWAHIDAH BINTI ABD GHANI

F

DICOS

Malaysian

33

ERIKA ANDREINA HERNANDEZ
QUINTANA *

F

DICOS

Venezuelan

**

**

*

** Group leader, * Sub-leader,
DID: Department of International Development;
DICOS: Department of International Cooperation;
DICOM: Department of International Communication.

2

Prof.
KusakaProf.
UmemuraProgram of OFW 2013
Preparatory Seminar at GSID
Date

Title of the Lectures and Names of the Lecturers

1

May 8 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15

2

May 15 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction to the Year 2013 OFW”
By Prof. Okada and Prof. Penghuy of GSID.
“Introduction to Education of Cambodia”
Prof. Aya Okada, GSID

3

May 22 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction of Research Sites in Siem Reap”
By Prof. Vuthy, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Visiting Researcher to GSID.

4

May 29 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction to Project Cycle Management”
By Prof. Tetsuo Umemura, GSID

5

June 5 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction to Cambodian Economy”
By Prof. Ngov Penghuy, GSID.

6

June 12 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction to Rural Community in Cambodia”
By Prof. Satoru Kobayashi, Kyoto University.

7

June 19 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15

Guidance on Research Proposal Writing.
By Participants and Group Advisors

8

June 26 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Community-Based Tourism Development: Theory and Practice"
By Prof. Vuthy, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Visiting Researcher to GSID.

9

July 3 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction to Contemporary History and Administration System of Cambodia”
By Prof. Koung Teilee, Graduate School of Law, Nagoya University

10

July 10 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Introduction of Campus ASEAN” by Prof. Lui Jing, GSID
“FDI and its impact on Cambodian Economy” by Prof. Penghuy, GSID

11

July 12 (Fri.)
16h30-18h00“Action Research on Health and Livelihood of Farmers in Cambodia”
By Prof. Yukiko Yonekura, Showa Women’s University

12

July 17 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15“Research Ethics”
By Prof. Wataru Kusaka, GSID

13

July 24 (Wed.)
14:45-16:15

Presentation of Research Plans by WGs (15 min presentation by each WG)

Interim Presentation of Research Findings in Phnom Penh
The interim presentation of research findings was held at the Royal University of Phnom Penh on
Sep. 27th, 2013. Each WG presented for 20 minutes and followed by Q&A session by theparticipants.

Presentation of Research Findings at GSID
The presentation of research findings was held at GSID by each working group to disseminate
and to collect feedback from colleagues on Oct. 30, 2013.

3

Overall Schedule of Fieldwork in Cambodia
Date

Activities
8:30 Meeting at Chubu International Airport
11:00 Departure from Nagoya (TG645)

Sep. 15 (Sun.)

15:00 Arrival at Bangkok (transit)
17:20 Departure from Bangkok (PG907)
18:15 Arrival at Siem Reap

Sep. 16 (Mon.)

Sep. 17 (Tue.)(Accommodation:Dara Reangsey Angkor Hotel)

Courtesy Visit to Siem Reap Governor (All WGs); Preliminary Visit to Ta Yaek
Commune; Get-to-know-each-other Gathering (all WGs)
Head of Dept. of Rural Development, CEDAC (WG1); Srah Srang Chheung Village Chief,
Teachers, Students (WG2); Dept. of Labor & Vocational Training, Dept. of Women Affairs(WG3); Angkor Handicraft Association, Dept. Of Tourism, Apsara Authorithy (WG4).

Sep. 18 (Wed.)

Ta Yaek Commune Chief, VDB Committee (WG1); Srah Srang Cheung Villagers, Dept.
Of Education (WG2); Boeung Vien Village, Migrant and Non-migrant Families (WG3);
Souvenir Shops around Angkor Wat and Krobei Village (WG4)Sep. 19 (Thu.)

Ta Yaek Village Chief, PDI-C Staff, Villagers (WG1); Srah Srang Village teachers,
students (WG2); Boeung Vien Village, PDI-C, Migrant and Non-Migrant Families (WG3);
Souvenir Shops in Siem Reap Town (WG4).

Sep. 20 (Fri.)Champei Village Chief, Villagers (WG1); Srah Srang Cheung Village teachers, students(WG2); Trav Bak Village Chief, Migrants and Non-migrant families (WG3); Angkor
Handicraft Association (WG4).

Sep. 21 (Sat.)Champei Villagers (WG1), Srah Srang Tbong Village teachers, students (WG2), Trav Bak
Village Migrants and Non-migrant workers (WG3), Group Works at Hotel (WG4)Sep. 22 (Sun.)

Free Activities

Sep. 23 (Mon.)

Bravel Village Chief, Villagers (WG1); Srah Srang Village Migrant and Non-migrant
Families (WG2); Trav Bak Village Migrants and Non-migrant Families (WG3); Souvenir
Shops around Angkor Wat (WG4).

Sep. 24 (Tue.)

Bravel Villagers (WG1); Srah Srang Tbong Villagers (WG2); Trav Bak Village Migrantand Non-Migrant Families (WG3); Souvenir Shops in Siem Reap Town (WG4).

Sep. 25 (Wed.)

Moving to Phnom Penh (All WGs)

Sep. 26 (Thu.)

Preparation for Findings Presentation

Sep. 27 (Fri.)

Findings Presentation

Sep. 28 (Sat.)NU-RULE-RUPP Joint International Seminar and Farewell Party
20:25 Departure from Phnom Penh (TG585)

Sep. 29 (Sun.)

21:30 Arrival at Bangkok (Transit)
00:05 Departure from Bangkok (TG644)

Sep. 9 (Sun.)

08:00 Arrival at Nagoya
4Background Information of Siem Reap Province, Cambodia

Men Prach Vuthy *∗General Information
The Kingdom of Cambodia is located in the Indochina Peninsula of Southeast Asia with geographicallocation (latitudes between 10º and 15ºN, and longitudes between 102º and 108ºE). Cambodia possesses
the land area of 181,035 square kilometers, sharing its border with Thailand, Laos and Vietnam. The total
population is estimated to be 14.07 millions in 2008 (NIS, 2009), covering by twenty-three provinces andone capital city.

Map of Cambodia Country
Source: Ministry of Tourism, Cambodia

Map of Cambodia in Southeast Asia
Source: www.villageearth.org [access December, 2013)

Historically, Cambodia is known as the Khmer Empire, the largest empire in Southeast Asia during
the 12th century. Angkor was the empire's capital city during that period and currently is now located in
Siem Reap province. It is situated in northwest of the country bordering Tonle Sap Lake in the south, thebiggest fresh water reservoir in Southeast Asia. Siem Reap province is home to Angkor Wat ruins, the
UNESCO world cultural heritage, bringing millions of tourists every year. In 2012, international tourists to∗

Lecturer at the Royal University of Phnom Penh and a visiting scholar to the Graduate School of International

Development, Nagoya University, from May 1 – August 31.

5

Cambodia registered 3.5 million people, 17.5 per cent increase from 2011 (Ministry of Tourism, 2012).
However, Siem Reap province is still classified as one of the poorest provinces in the country (Beresford etal. 2004; Ministry of Planning, 2012). According to the local economic impacts assessment in Siem Reap,
it shows that only 5.4% of 64% of international tourist spending benefited the poor (Ministry of Interior,2009).

Administrative Subdivision
Province is classified as a sub-national administrative body. It is supervised and managed by thecentral government and the ministry of interior is in-charge of those sub-national administrative divisions.
In 2002, the Royal Government of Cambodia has introduced Decentralization and De-concentration policy
requiring the commune councils to be elected through general local election in every five years. For
example, in the June 2012, 11,459 seats for the commune councils were elected. Particularly in Siem Reap
province, there are 12 districts divided with 100 communes and 876 villages (Provincial Department ofPlanning, 2012).

Source: www.foodsecurityatlas.org

Socio-demography
Siem Reap province covers an area of 10,299 square kilometers. According to the national census
2008, the province has the sixth largest population in the country, consisted of 896,443 people with anaverage population density of 87 persons per square kilometer, higher than the country’s average
population density of 75 persons per square kilometer (National Institute of Statistics, 2008). The current
population of Siem Reap in 2012 was 972,488 people and the average family members were 5.09 people.
6

Fifty two percent of population is aged between 18 and 60 years old and 43% are under 17 year-old. Only
5% are 61 years old and over.

Households headed by female were 14% about 14% (Provincial

Department of Planning, 2012).

Education
Access to education of people in Siem Reap can be overviewed that, the net enrollment of students inupper secondary and lower secondary education is relatively low, showing only at 14.9% and 24.8%,
respectively in the 2011 academic year (MoEYS, 2012). This infers that number of people who have accessto higher education is even much fewer. Moreover, approximately 14% of the people in the province aged
between 15 and 45 years old are illiterate (Provincial department of planning, 2012).

Economic Situation
Siem Reap province is considered one of the most attractive destinations for tourists in the country.
The number of international tourists to Siem Reap increased dramatically from 0.56 million in 2004 to 1.61
million in 2011 and to 2.06 million tourists in 2012, with annual growth rate of 20%. Tourist arrival toSiem Reap covers more than half of the country tourist’s arrivals. The Angkor World heritage sites andother natural attraction sites in the province such as Kulen mountain and water fall, floating villages, Prek
Toal bird sanctuary offer additional magnificent options for the tourists. The "Open Skies" policy, which
has allowed direct flights to Siem Reap since 2004, also plays an important role to promote tourist arrival.

Source: www.art-days.com

Source: www.wikitravel.org

It has been estimated that tourist spending in Siem Reap in 2007 was about US$500 million, which
contributed about 25% of total GRDP (Ministry of Interior, 2009). Jobs have been created and income has
been generated for local residents. However, according the report prepared by Siem Reap provincial
department of planning in 2012, it shows that only 14% of people worked in service sector (include daily
wage workers) as their primary occupation and 78% of the people is still engaged in agricultural works.
The rest is engaged in fishing, craft works, and Non-Timber Forest Product (NTFP). This suggests that
benefit from tourist arrival does really trickle down to the majority of the population in the province yet.
7

Domestic and international migration can also be seen in Siem Reap. About 4% of people in Siem
Reap migrate to work in Siem Reap provincial town and in foreign countries, most of which goes toThailand given the province’s proximity to the Thai border. About two third of the migrant workers areinternational migrants and only one third are domestic migrants (Provincial Department of Planning, 2012).

References:
Beresford, M.B. et al. (2004). The Macroeconomics of Poverty Reduction in Cambodia. Asia-PacificRegional Program on the Macro-Economics of Poverty Reduction. Phnom Penh: United Nations

Development Programme.

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS). (2012). Education statistics and indicators 2011/2012,
EMIS office, Department of Planning. Phnom Penh.
(http://www.moeys.gov.kh/km/home/113-emis-by-year/259-emis-2011-2012.html [Accessed December 12,
2013])

Ministry of Interior (2009). "Tourism sector assessment: Siem Reap provincial economy and its tourism
sector current economic analysis" In Empowerment of the poor in Siem Reap: scoping and diagnostic work.
Phnom Penh.

Ministry of Planning (2012). Identification of poor households, Cambodia: result from data collection
rounds 4 (2010) and 5 (2011). Ministry of Planning. Phnom Penh.

National Institute of Statistics (2008). General population census of Cambodia 2008: Provisional Population
Totals. Phnom Penh.

Provincial Department of Planning (2012). Province Profile Year 2012 for Local Development
Management: Based on Village and Commune/Sangkat data. Siem Reap.

8

Working Group 1
The Role of Community Finance in Cambodia
Focusing on the Relationship between
Community Finance and Investment
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Findings
4. Analysis
5. Conclusion
6. Acknowledgement
7. References

Group Advisor
Professor Aya Okada
Written by
Tanveer Iqbal**,Ding Yan*,

Ai

Chiaki Hojo,

Issifu Ibrahim,

Jisoo Jeon,

Rokonuzzaman Mohammed,

Soto Murillo Antonio Leonardo

Konno,**Group leader*Group Sub-leader

9The Role of Community Finance in Cambodia:
Focusing on the Relationship between Community Finance andInvestment
1.

Introduction

1-1. Introduction of the field site
Although Cambodia is rich in natural resources, the war and internal conflict have made Cambodia
one of the world’s poorest countries. In 2011, Cambodia’s GDP reached US$14.204 billion. The real GDP
growth of Cambodia rose from 0.1% in 2009 to 6.2% in 2012. Among all the sectors, agriculture’s contribution
to the GDP of Cambodia accounted for 30.9%. However, the economy and the living conditions of the rural
people remain a challenge even though Cambodia’s GDP growth was impressive. The urban population was
only 20% of the total population in 2011 and 56.46% of the total population lived on less than $2 a day. The
Gini Index was 37.85 in 2008, which ranked 73th of all countries.1 Two thirds of the country’s rural households
face seasonal food shortages each year and some of the poorest people include subsistence farmers and membersof poor fishing communities, etc. Because of a lack of education and skills training, people have inadequate
employment opportunities and low capabilities. Poor health, lack of education, poor infrastructure and low
productivity lead to deeper poverty.2
Siem Reap is located in Northwest Cambodia. It borders Oddar Meanchey to the North, Preah Vihear
and Kapong Thom to the East, the Tonle Sap Lake to the South and Banteay Meanchey to the West. The area ofthe province is 10,299 square kilometers.3 The topography of the province is variable with the Tonle Sap
floodplains along the Southern border, through a belt of lowland paddy fields, to a lowland/upland mosaic offorested areas to the north. Siem Reap is classified as a rural province. The World Heritage Site of Angkor Wat
is located in this province.
Figure 1: Political Map of Cambodia

Source: CSES 1997 and Estimation of Poverty Rates at Commune level in Cambodia, WFP 2003.
10

1-1-1. The situation of sample villages
This section describes an overview of the sample villages: Ta Yaek Village, Champei Village and Baval
Village in Ta Yaek Commune, Siem Reap Province. Siem Reap City is the center of the province and second
largest city after Phnom Penh. The city attracts many foreign tourists because there are many remains to visit
such as Angkor Watt, Angkor Thom and many other temples. Despite the prosperity in Siem Reap City, Siem
Reap Province has a high incidence of poverty.
In Siem Reap Province, Ta Yaek Commune was selected for the research field. Ta Yaek is located oneast side of the province and it is divided into nine villages. The population of Ta Yaek is around 13,000 people.
Eighty two percent (82%) of people do agricultural work as their primary occupation, with over 90% of the total
land of the commune are used for agriculture. Most of them farm rice while others are farming short-term crops
or cultivating vegetables such as cassava, mung bean or soya beans, etc. Outside of agriculture, there are a few
people who work in craftwork, the service sector or are wage earners. Transportation in the commune isprimarily by bicycle or on foot. There are very few people who have a motorbikes or an automobile. A few
people have borrowed money from microfinance institutes or banks, but the number is relatively small. Around
0.6% of population in the commune borrowed money from them.
Among the nine villages in Ta Yaek Commune, three villages were chosen for study because
Population & Development International Cambodia (PDI-C) is conducting their microcredit project in thosevillages. The population among the three villages is 1,508 people in Ta Yaek, 567 people in Champei and 2,848
people in Baval. Baval has the largest population in Ta Yaek while Champei village has the smallest population.
Among the three villages, Baval has the worst living condition. It is difficult for Baval to obtain basic public
services such as education, sanitation, health and others, due to its distance from the commune office andbecause road conditions are poor compared to the other villages. As for education, the enrollment rate andliteracy rate of Ta Yaek and Champai are relatively high for the commune.

1-2. Introduction of PDI in Cambodia
Our group focused on the Population Development International (PDI), an international NGO, as a casefor examining the role of community finance in Cambodia. It was established in June 2010 and is sponsored by
the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The vision of this institution is to empower the poor through providing
opportunities to enable them to up lift from poverty, and empower local NGOs to become financiallyself-sustainable. The main mission is to provide training and skills for sustainable income generation, build
capability and to promote social enterprise development in the kingdom of Cambodia. The headquarters of
PDI-Cambodia is in Siem Reap, with a satellite office in Dom-Dek Town.

Currently they are mainly working

in Ta-Yaek and Russei-Lok communities.
As the main purpose of this institution is to improve local people’s quality of life and develop theircommunity, they established the Village Development Partnership (VDP) program in the five key areas most in
need. These are community empowerment, economic development, health improvement, environmental
11

protection and youth development. This study is focused on the community empowerment and economic
development that supports community activities.

1-2-1. Process of village development partnership

Basically there are 5 steps in the process of Village Development Partnership (VDP). The first is for the
VDP staff to select a village that is motivated to improve the quality of life of villagers. The village is selected
through an election from the Village Development Committee with four sub-committees. These committee
representatives will select villages for community improvements. The second step is preliminary planning which
the VDP staff. This identifies basic needs for the community and sets actual goals that the villagers can attain ina short or long term. Third step is the establishment of the Village Development Bank, in which the sponsoringorganization is directly involved. All community members participate in tree planting activities and each planted
tree brings in $1.25 to the Village Development Bank. This becomes the fund for microcredit, which is managedby villagers themselves, and the capital earned by villagers from tree planting remains as a fund to loan for small
enterprise activities in the community. In short, the villagers themselves operate the Village Development Bank,
which is quite different from other microcredit institutions. The VDP staff is trained to manage the microcredit
loans and the interest rate (1% per month) without collateral or guarantee. Purposes for loans must be related toincome generating activities, such as fertilizer for rice farming, purchase of milling machines, raising chickens,raising pigs and grocery shops, etc.

The fourth step is skill training, including one of the training projects

called the Barefoot MBA program. PDI staff provides basic business skill training for villagers and motivatespeople to share their skills and advice. The main purpose of this training program is to provide business training
to those who receive loans from the Village Development Bank and to give opportunities to expand income
generation activities. The training program helps villagers learn how to run small businesses effectively throughthe acquisition of basic skills, such as administration and management. There have been several successful
economic activities that have emerged from this training pertaining to rice-mill cooperatives.

After the training,it leads to the last process, which is income generation. During the five steps, the VDP staff work on monitoring
to make sure development is being conducted effectively.

1-2-2. Implementation phase of Village Development Bank
The implementation phase in tree planting and saving groups provides the main capital resources for the
Village Development Bank (VDB). Sponsors provide funds for tree planting at a rate of $1.25 per tree. This
money goes to a saving account for community members, which becomes the capital resource for the institution.
12

The VDB committee discusses the establishment of policies and rules of their bank. The common rules include
the requirement of membership, monthly due dates for loan payments, loan application screening, businesstraining, payment terms and saving account terms (minimum deposit), etc. Some typical characteristics of the
VDB are that it opens regularly once a month for transaction business; members of VDB must save a fixedamount of money monthly; and only members of the VDB are eligible for loans, given one loan at a time, withan interest rate of 1% per month. The maximum loan amount is usually US$500.

1-2-3. Procedure to receive credit

There are five procedures to go through in order to receive credit. The first step is to become a memberof the VDB. Regardless of the number of family members, a villager can register as a member of VDB, but
normally one person represents each household. The second step requires that the villager be a member of asavings group for at least 6 months. In order to borrow capital, they need to save a certain amount of money
every month before they can fill out a loan application. The third step is to receive training from the PDI staff inareas such as pig raising, chicken farming and business skills, etc. The fourth step is to apply for a business plan.
Only those who have received training and have saved regularly for at least six months are qualified to apply fora business plan. VDB staff will check the business plan and determine whether it is reasonable for income
generation.

As a last procedure, the staff will give the loan to the applicant in cash. Only borrowers who have

paid back all their money can apply for a second round.
There are two ways to pay back loans; the first method is to pay only the interest monthly and pay theentire amount of the capital in the last month. The second method is to pay the interest and part of capital
together every month.

1-3. Problem statement
Rural households are commonly engaged in crop production, most typically rice production, to growtheir own food and for cash income at least one season per year. Most food crop production in Siem Reap israin-fed and is confined to the wet season, with 84% of households producing crops during the wet season
compared to only 11% of households in the dry season. Further, most dry season planting is restricted to only
some communities within the province that have access to groundwater or flood recession, irrigation, or surface
water. Thus, limitations imposed through the dependency on rain-fed crop cultivation are clearly contributing toshortages in food availability.

13

Table 1: Agriculture land per rural household in Siem Reap and the nation

Agriculture land per rural
household% of rural households thisprovince% of rural household national

Landless

14%

15%

Less than 1.0 hectare

37%

49%

1.0-<3.0 hectares

42%

30%

>= 3.0 hectares

8%

6%

Source: MAFF 2004

Figure 2: Percentage of the Population Below the Consumption Poverty Line by Commune inSiem Reap 1997

Source: CSES 1997 and Estimation of Poverty Rates at Commune level in Cambodia, WFP 2003.

1-4. Research objective
This study aims to analyze the role of community finance in productive activities.

1-5. Research question
This study tries to answer the following questions:14Research Question: How does community finance contribute to productive investment?
Sub Research Question:
What is the role of community finance in the improvement of agriculture/livestock and businessactivities?

2. Methodology
2-1. Literature review
This section discusses the existing studies on community finance and microcredit for productive use
and poverty alleviation.
First, there is a need for a brief discussion of microcredit and community finance. Microcredit is arelatively small amount of money provided as a loan to people from self-help groups through bank-NGO
partnerships (Grameen Bank, 2011). Forming savings groups by loan recipients has also been one of theimportant criteria for getting credit. On the other hand, community finance is community managed credit andsavings associations established by NGOs to provide access to financial services, build community self-helpgroups, and help members accumulate savings (Holt, 1994). Therefore, in this section, we present somediscussion and findings, as well as opinions, based on empirical studies regarding the productive use of
microcredit.
The source of micro-credit is the savings of poor people. Existing commercial banks usually do notgive credit to the poor because they cannot fulfill the criteria imposed those banks, especially mortgage1. The
poor have fewer amounts of resources meet the conditions imposed by commercial banks. The asset-less poorfind it easier to access institutional credit through groups and to work with groups that they select (World bank,1998; and Otero, 1999). Littlefield et al. (2004) stated poor people are excluded from state financial sectors but
microfinance organizations have included them by providing credit using farm activities. Bhuiyan et al. (2013)
conducted research and they concluded that the poor, as well as lower income groups, are facing major problems
in accessing credit. Their lack of assets for collateral, lack of financial records and limited credit history has
made it almost impossible for them to obtain credit from the formal financial institutions. In this regard,
microfinance programs are generally perceived as one of the practical and attractive means for providing
accessibility to credit, to increase total family livelihood opportunities through different strategies of Income
Generating Activities (IGAs). This in turn hopes to provide sufficient income and the potential to ensuresustainable livelihoods by improving good health, children’s access to education, skills, acquiring assets andability to participate in social activities. However, some micro lending agencies in Bangladesh, India, Pakistan,and Sri Lanka claim 30-70% interest rates in a year on borrowers (Fernando, 2006).

1

The International Year of	
   An agreement giving lawful right to the lender seizing the assets such as land, house etc. of borrower if fail to pay

credit.
	
  15

Microcredit (2005) cited that in Bolivia, microcredit loan clients doubled their income in two years, according to
the Global Development Research Center. Clients were also more likely to access health care for themselves andtheir families, and more likely to send their children to school. UNCDF (2004) stated that microfinance plays
three key roles in development. It helps very poor households meet basic needs; protects against risks associatedwith improvements in household economic welfare; and helps to empower women by supporting women’s
economic participation and so promotes gender equity. Moreover, apart from providing credit to poor people,
microcredit organizations usually provide some training for effective use of the credit, which leads to increased
income.
Nevertheless, though microcredit is one of the most important institutional financial resources for thepoor, it has some limitations as well as adverse impacts. Ito (2008) stated that microfinance commercialization is
not good for poor recipients. There might also be cases of excluding the extremely poor because people fromthis group have incidences of not paying back installments in a timely manner. In this regard, Islam (2007)
stated that the Grammen Bank operating in Bangladesh provides credit support to poor people but it could notreach the poorest of the poor. Some researchers believe that microcredit in some countries leads some people
into a poverty trap.

More research is required to investigate the reason for burdens of microcredit, some ofwhich have influenced some borrowers to even commit suicide in India and Bangladesh. However, initially it
was believed that microcredit schemes provide women with access to credit for improving their empowerment.
Indeed, D’ Espallier et al. (2009) concluded after analyzing 350 microfinance institute (MFI) in 70 countries
that women clients are better as a credit risk and that is why women are the best choice for disbursing credit
among them.

2-2. Research site
Fieldwork focusing on Village Development Banks (VDB) in Cambodia was conducted for two weeks
in October 2013. Three villages participating in VDB programs were chosen: Ta Yaek, Champei and Braval.
Forty-two households and at least one officer of PDI-C were interviewed. During the course of this fieldwork weinterviewed the head of Cambodia Centre for Study and Development (CEDAC), representatives of the councilsof Ta Yaek, Champei and Braval villages and officials of Rural Development Department Siem Reap. The
selection of participating villages was random, however the selection of participants or individuals forinterviews was done by sampling to ensure that only persons with a deep insight into VDB activities were
included, helping to bring out information that was relevant to this research.
The study adopts a qualitative approach; the responses from household interviews are grouped andtabulated, presented in graphs, and other pictorial forms to allow for easy understanding of the interview results.
This is supported by more detailed interview results and explanatory notes.
The study focuses on VDB because this source of community financing is supposed to be developed
into one of the most easily accessed sources of funds for productive activities in Siem Reap. The research isbelieved to have generated results that will be useful to the management of the VDB, policy makers and the16business community at large.

2-3. Data collection
The primary data was obtained using structured interviews as a tool to gather relevant data fromhouseholds who deal directly with VDB activities on a regular basis. The interviews were carefully designed tosolicit key information, which was elicited through open-ended and contingency questions.
Secondary data was basically gathered from PDI-C financial statements, loan sheets and other documents thatwere deemed helpful in the study. The secondary data revealed the actual credit assessment information of theparticipants. For instance, Champei Village has 139 memberships with total amount of US$27,968.89 loaned asof August 31, 2013.4)

2-4. Scope and limitations
Despite its high ambitions, this field study was constrained by time and scope limitations, which
required the research to focus on only three villages. Consequently, this study could not research VDB activities
in most of the villages in the research area. However, such limitations were managed in a positive way so they
do not affect the quality of the research. Therefore, the findings of this paper should be regarded as exploratory.

3. Findings
3-1. Data collection
The interviews with government and village officials and NGOs were intended to elicit comprehensive
opinions on community finance in the villages. Through the interviews with government and village officials, it
was expected to reveal information about the village policy and its impact on community finance. These
interviews were conducted to learn these activities and obtain primary information about the village. Interviews
with NGO staff were conducted to investigate how the projects work in the villages and contribute to thedevelopment of community finance. Their recommendations on policy, as well as the village activities are
expected to help improve the performance of the village in this sector. According to 6 interviews, they shared
their research findings with resource from interview.

Table 2: Number and location of interviewees
Interviewee
Rural Development Department,
Member of Commune
VDB staff
VDB staff
Head of CEDAC
Head of PDI Main Office

Number1 director
6 deputy directors
8 members
3 staff workers
4 staff workers
1 director
2 staff workers

Detail of findings is presented below:
17

Place
Siem Reap Province
Ta Yaek Village
Ta Yaek Village
Braval Village
Siem Reap Province
Siem Reap Province

3-2. Family size
Figure 3: Family Size

Source: Fieldwork survey.
The figure shows that out of 42 families, 21 respondents have four or less than four family members.
While in rest of 21 households family members vary from 5 to 11. It may include extended families like children,
parents and other kin. Fifty percent (50%) of respondents with small households to provide for may be a sign of
growing social awareness.

3-3. Gender
Figure 4: Gender

Source: Field survey
Females constitute 79% of the sample size because of their presence and availability for VDB activities.
Many men remained busy in employment or working outside the village, therefore women were seen to besuitable for lending. In countries like Bangladesh, lending to women is considered as social development but inthis field survey did not find such a policy stated by the VDB. Rather, it was more related to availability.
18

3-4 Lending institutions before VDB
Figure 5: Credit Sources Before VDB

Source: Field survey
Different institutions were providing loans, such as

Acleda, AMK, PRASAC, and CBIRD before the

VDB started operating in the villages under study and 63% of respondents used these facilties. There were alsoprivate lenders who constituted just 2% of lending according to the data collected. However informal lenders
work beyond regulation and sometimes are involved in unjust acts. Seven percent (7%) were found to borrowfrom relatives or neighbours. There was a considerable percentage of those who had not borrowed before,possibily showing a lack of their ability or capacity.

3-5. Percentage of loans per households
Figure 6: Percentage of repeating borrowers

Source: Fieldwork survey
Each member can borrow up to one million riels (approximately US$240) at one time and a second
round of financing is available after the full payment of the first loan. VDB prefers new members rather than old
19members for the second or third rounds of borrowing. That is the reason why 54% have borrowed only time,
36% twice and only 10% three times.

3-6. Borrowers’ perceptions of VDB
Perception entails how respondents feel about VDB policies. When asked if it is a good experience forthem or just like other institutions, 67% of respondents gave positive feedback, indicating that they consider
VDB a better option for credit opportunities. This is primarily so, because of its low interest rate, easy
processing and general role of PDI in community development. Alternatively, 5 % of respondents had negative
feedback about VDB. However, their negative experience was not about lending policies but for other reasons
like the large sum of debt incurred and wrong investments, which resulted in losses. The perceptions “nochange” and “not sure” refer to a situation where respondents could not judge the effect that financing had.
These perceptions do not correspond to losses, but rather refer to a comparatively short time to judge the effectsof financing.

3-7. Reasons of borrowing
Figure 7: Reasons for Borrowing

Source: Fieldwork survey

The VDB offers a low interest rate compared to other lending institutions. Most other institutions offer
3%, while the VDB rate is 1%. This is the most attractive reason for borrowing from the VDB. Expanding
agricultural activities, like the purchase of inputs, rice farming, and cassava plantation are the second mostimportant reason for borrowing from the VDB. Easy processing is also a reason and it signifies the proceduralease compared to other lending institutions. We can include easy processing, group feeling and the PDI as a
combined factor. The PDI, as mentioned earlier, is a recent project and the VDB is just one its activities. The
perception and preference for the VDB is based on its overall activities in village areas. Community
development, social awareness and a sense of ownership have made the VDB a preferred lending institution in
Siem Reap Province. Other reasons such as consumption and business are a much smaller reason for borrowings.
Low interest rates, agriculture and PDI make VDB a preferred lending institution.
20

3-8. Occupations
Figure 8: Occupations

Source: Fieldwork survey

Agriculture is a main occupation of farmers in Tayek commune. Agriculture includes rice farming,
livestock, potato farming, beans and casaba plantation. Next occupation is small businesses like grocery stores
and CD renting. Other occupations primarily construction work, bicycle workshops etc. are not very significant
because it is tiny and backward village economy which accommodates only agriculture.

3-9. Micro credit utilization
Figure 9: Credit utilization

Source: Fieldwork survey

How and where borrowers spend their loans is an important question. Because these are rural areas,
the local economy offers very little opportunities. In other words except for agriculture, other occupations
are almost nonexistent. Microcredit utilization in agriculture is mostly related to the purchase of inputs, e.g.
21fertilizers and labor. Livestock rearing, such as chickens and pigs, is the next important utilization of credit.
Small businesses like grocery stores rank third in utilization. Very few households use credit for
consumption purposes, which indicates that the credit is almost used for investment in productive activities.

4. Analysis
In order to analyze the influence of this program on the local economy of the village, changes that haveoccurred in several aspects are described. The accessibility of credit, the interest rates, skill development, local
industries, the labor market and the savings culture are the aspects of the economy that are focused on are forthis analysis.

4-1. Access to credit
Before the implementation of the VDB, the only available sources of credit for most people in thevillages under study were traditional microcredit banks, private moneylenders, and friends or relatives.
Microcredit institutions demanded collateral or personal guarantors in order to make a loan and the villagers
who could not meet this requirement did not have access to credit from these sources. However, after the
implementation of the VDB, villagers had a new source of credit that does not demand collateral.
The only requirement for accessing loans from the VDB is to become a member of the local savings
group and save consistently for at least six months. This program made an important change in the access tocredit in the villages studied because it makes possible for hundreds of families to have access to credits without
the need of collateral.

4-2. Interest rate
Before the launch of the VDB the lowest interest rate available for credit was 3% per month. It is theinterest rate that microcredit institutions charge to their clients. Other credit sources such as privatemoneylenders charge higher rates that vary from case to case. In the most extreme case in our sample, theborrower used to pay an interest rate of 30% per month.
Currently all the villagers who borrow from the VDB enjoy an interest rate of only 1% per month,which is the lowest among all the credit sources available to them (except for relatives or friends who might lendmoney with no interest).

4-3. Training and skills development program
Before the PDI’s arrival in Siem Reap Province, there were no free training programs that focused on
productive activities, nor incentives to look for training.
Thanks to the PDI, now villagers can receive free training for several productive activities such as pig andchicken raising techniques, rice farming, and business plan creation. The people who receive credit from the
VDB are encouraged to participate in these training programs as a prerequisite to get the credit.
224-4. Pig raising industry
The pig raising industry has experienced important changes after the arrival of the PDI to the villages
studied. The combination of credit provided by the VDB and the training provided by the other programs of the
PDI has encouraged many families to start raising pigs as a way to diversify their sources of income. Also, it
helped to reduce the average time needed for a pig to grow. In the past, it used to take about 7 months but now
that time was reduced to only 3.5 months.
This means that some families who had no experience in raising pigs received training for doing it in an
efficient way and the credit to buy pigs and the highly efficient food needed for accelerating their growth.
Training and credits were also useful for some villagers who were already raising pigs but did not know or could
not afford the most efficient raising techniques.
However it is necessary to mention that in a few cases the pigs died and the overall result was negative
because borrowers lost their investments and had to repay loans from their other sources of income.

4-5. Rice farming industry
The credits provided by the VDB have contributed to rice production by making it easier for farmers topurchase fertilizers and hire labor during harvesting season. Before the VDB, farmers used to borrow money for
fertilizers from microcredit institutions or private moneylenders who charged higher interest rates, undermining
their profit margins.
The amount of the credit is too small to purchase more efficient technologies such as irrigation systems
or specialized machinery. Although they had to pay higher costs, most farmers were already using fertilizers andhiring labor for harvesting even before the implementation of the VDB. Therefore, it cannot be said that thisprogram has introduced revolutionary changes to the rice farming industry but it is certainly improving theaccessibility to credit and the costs of credit.
Nevertheless, in the short interviews conducted, there were a few members of the sample who wereunable to afford fertilizers before the introduction of the VDB credit and started using it after receiving the first
loan. For those farmers, the benefits of the VDB program is not only ease of access to credit and lower interest
rates, but also an actual transformation of the way they produce rice and a considerable increase in theirproductivity and income.

4-6. Labor market
One of the most common uses of the credit was to hire labor for harvesting rice and other crops.
Similar to what happened with the fertilizers, the majority of rice farmers were already hiring labor for harvest
even before the existence of the VDB. The cases in which farmers would not be able to afford hiring labor
without the credit were very few. Also in most cases, the number of people that farmers hire did not increase
either. Therefore, it can be said that although there is some job creation thanks to the VDB credits, the main
benefit of this program in the labor market is to reduce uncertainty by providing a stable source of credits for23hiring labor.

4-7. Saving culture
Before the implementation of the VDB’s savings groups, there were few options to save money otherthan the traditional microcredit institutions. The incentives to save and the information provided were also
scarce. However, after the creation of the VDB’s savings groups there is a campaign for teaching families theimportance of saving in order to make those savings groups grow. Also, the incentives for saving are higher
because before receiving credit from the VDB it is required to save for at least six months. Additionally, people
are more motivated to save with the VDB savings groups because they know that the money will be used in thevillage instead of going to other districts as it would if they saved in traditional microcredit institutions.

5. Conclusion
In the short time since this credit program was launched in 2011, it has been functioning to increase thecredit availability and improve the credit conditions for many villagers in the region studied. Although it is too
soon to evaluate the total impact of the new credit environment it is possible to state that this program has been
beneficial for the income generating activities of most of the participants.
According to the results of our short interviews, there were very few cases in which the money was used
for consumption. Almost all of the loans went to support productive activities.
The families that borrowed money were all local villagers living in the area of study. The average size of thefamily was 5 members and the main occupations were rice farming, chicken and pig raising and operating
grocery stores.
Due to the small amount of each loan, most of borrowers could not use the credits for big investments incapital assets such as machinery, but normally they used the money to buy inputs for their already existingproductive activities (fertilizer for rice farmers or stock for grocery stores owners). However, some did use thecredit for starting new kinds of business.
Those families who used credits for moving towards better production techniques or for starting new
business had a considerable increase in their income. However, families that used credit for new endeavors werefew. Most of the credits were used in traditional productive activities. The main benefits for these families werecheaper interest rates and more credit availability.
Training and credit availability helped borrowers to expand their productive activities. There was a highrate of borrowers who, after their first experience borrowing money from the VDB decided to borrow again.
This means that most of people were able to repay their loans and also were satisfied enough to take new loans
from the VDB.
In summary, in the short time of its existence, the main role of community finance in the region of study
has been to support the already existing productive activities in the villages such as agriculture, livestock andsmall businesses by providing easier access to credit and lower interest rates. However, if the number of24participants and the amount of money available keep increasing, this role could possibly take on new
dimensions.

6. Acknowledgements
We would like to express our gratitude to several institutions and persons whose collaboration made thisreport possible. First, we must thank the organizers and financers of the fieldwork activities at the Nagoya
University Graduate School of International Development, the Royal University of Phnom Penh and Campus
ASEAN Program. Their excellent organization and great generosity provided to us the best possible conditions
to conduct the fieldwork.
Also we would like to acknowledge the faculty and staff of Nagoya University’s GSID who guided us
in the preparation previous to the fieldwork, during the fieldwork and in the process of writing the report.
Especially we must mention the brilliant role of our group advisor Professor Okada. With her astonishingwisdom she could give a great quantity of advice in a few words. Also we must give special thanks to Professor
Penghuy who was a key connection between Nagoya University members and Cambodian counterparts.
The members of our Cambodian counterpart deserve also our greatest gratitude. The guidance we
received by Professor Naret was a crucial element to achieve our goals in the fieldwork. Also the translation andhelp we received from the students of RUPP who were assigned to our team was remarkable. Morokoth Keo andMony Rath not only became members of our team but close friends.
This study could not be possible without the cooperation from several institutions in Cambodia. The
government officials in the Siem Reap province, the local authorities in each village, the members of PDI andother NGOs in Cambodia provided us valuable information that was crucial. Equally important was thecooperation of all the villagers who conceded us interviews, gave us information, guided us in the village anddelighted us with their hospitality and generosity.
In Cambodia we were impressed by the hospitality of the people in all the places we went to. The
people we met in the NGOs, villages, hotels, restaurants, stores, “tuc-tucs” and in the streets were always kind,
supportive and warm. We are glad to express our eternal gratitude to all of them.
Finally we would like to say that before this fieldwork we could not imagine what a wonderful is
Cambodia and particularly Siem Reap Province. We will always keep in our hearts the beauty of the region andthe good memories of this experience. We hope that we can visit Cambodia again and that when that day comes
we find a united and much more developed nation.

1

World Bank. 1998. “Using Microcredit to Advance Women.” Prem Notes 8.

2

Cambodia Country Report Rural poverty in Cambodia
http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/country/home/tags/cambodia (November 3, 2013)

3

MAFF:

4

The monthly VDB and VTL Progress Report-August 31, 2013, Champei Village.

http://www.maff.gov.kh (November 13, 2013)

25

7. References
Bhuiyan, A.B., Siwar, C., Ismail A. G., Hossain T.B., and Rashid, M. 2013. Microfinance and Poverty
Alleviation: A Conceptual linkage of Micro financing Approaches for Poverty Alleviation. Journal of Applied
Sciences Research. 9(1): 17-21.
D’Espallier, B., Guerin, I. and Mersland, R. 2009. Women and Repayment in Microfinance. Working Paper
RUME. Marseille, France: Provence University/ Rume Project
Fernando, N.A. 2006. Understanding and Dealing with High Interest Rates on Microcredit – A note to Policy
makers in the Asia and Pacific Region. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
Holt, S. 1994. “The village bank methodology: performance and prospects,” in The New World ofMicroenterprise Finance, ed. Maria Otero and Elizabeth Rhyne. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Islam, T. 2007. Microcredit and Poverty Alleviation. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited
Ito, S. 2008. Cambodian Microfinance: A Case of Successful Commercialization? Forum of International
Development Studies. 37: 19-33.
Littlefield, E., Murduch, J. & Hashemi, S. 2004. Is Microfinance an Effective Strategy to Reach the Millennium
Development Goals? Focus Note Series no. 24. Washington: CGAP -Consultative Group to Assist the Poor.
Otero, M. 1999. Bringing Development Back into Microfinance. Latin America: ACCION International.
UNCDF. 2004. Basic facts about Microfinance. New York: United Nations Capital Development Fund
United Nations. 2004. International Year of Microcredit 2005 Concept Paper: Building Inclusive Financial
Sectors to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations.
World Bank. 1998. “Using Microcredit to Advance Women.” Prem Notes 8.
http://www.grameen-info.org (11 November 2013)26

Working Group 2
Lower Secondary School Education in Cambodia~Focusing on Factors that Influence Students’ Attendance:
The Case of Siem Reap Province~

1. Introduction
2. Research methodology
3. Literature review
4. Findings & analysis
5. Conclusion
6. Acknowledgments
7. References

Group Advisor
Professor Itsuko Fujimura

Written by
Mika Hattori Vermeulen**,

Kosuke Ueda*,

Leonidas Hancco,

Lan Chenglu,

Zhang Yu,

Natsuki Kondo,

Shuhei Sugimori,

Kai Nakamura** Group leader*Group Sub-leader

27

Lower Secondary School Education in Cambodia~Focusing on Factors that Influence Students’ Attendance:
The Case of Siem Reap Province~
1. Introduction
1-1. Background1-1-1. Cambodian education policy
The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MOEYS) prepared and published the “Education Strategic
Plan 2009-2013”. In the plan, “to establish and develop human resources of the very highest quality and ethics inorder to develop a knowledge-based society within Cambodia”(Education Strategic Plan 2009-2013) was
introduced as the vision and mission of MOEYS.
In order to achieve this mission, the MOEYS has three policy target areas:- Ensuring Equitable Access to Education Service- Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Education Services- Institutional and Capacity Development for Education Staff for Decentralization
They are implementing strategies in addition to these 3 areas, especially in order to increase attendanceat school. For example, they are working to reduce parental cost barriers, increasing the number of scholarships(cash or food) for students from poor families especially girls, and enhancing parent/community involvement inall stages of schooling, especially by commune councils.
In terms of secondary education, the policy objectives for lower secondary education are: 1) to reduce
access barriers for students; 2) to improve the quality and efficiency of educational services in order to increase
7-9 survival and grade 9-10 transition rates.

1-1-2. Education Situation in Cambodia
Table 1-1: School Enrollment Ratio in Cambodia in 2008
Primary Education
Secondary Education

Net Enrollment Ratio
96.0%
37.6%

Gross Enrollment Ratio
125.6%
44.4%

Source: The World Bank. World Development Indicators
Like many of the developing countries, Cambodia is facing many educational challenges. One of the
major challenges Cambodia is facing is children’s enrollment in secondary education. As shown in Table 1
above, the net enrollment ratio for primary education is 96.0% and net enrollment for secondary education is
37.6%. Also, you can see that gross enrollment in primary education is 125.6% and the gross enrollment insecondary school is 44.4%. This data indicates that there is a great drop in enrollment from primary to secondary
education. Many children are able to go to primary school, but only half of the children can go to secondary
school. In fact, the MOEYS mentions that the completion ratio in lower secondary education is less than half,28

just 48.7%, while over 80% of students can complete primary education.
Moreover, the gap between net and gross enrollment ratios indicates that many of the children go to
primary school, but there are also many students that do not attend school at a proper age. This is more
conspicuous in secondary school. According to the “Education Statistics & Indicators 2012/2013,” thepercentage of over-age enrollment in primary education is 19.3%, but the percentage in lower secondary
education is 29.4%, and upper secondary education is 34.0%.

1-2. Problem statement
Looking at development from a rights-based approach, education is considered not only as a means ofdevelopment, but also as a basic human right. This right of access to education is also stated in Article 26 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: "Everyone has the right to education." As the declaration also statesthat education at elementary level should be free and compulsory, many development goals such as set by theMillennium Development Goals and Education for All target universalizing primary education.
As mentioned, the enrollment ratio of primary education in Cambodia has a high percentage: a net
enrollment ratio of 96.0 percent and a gross enrollment ratio of 125.6 percent in 2008. However, the ratio greatly
declines at the secondary level. Difficulties such as poverty deprive children of the opportunity to attend school.
Lack of support for children to access education, especially at the secondary level, is a considerable issue.

1-3. Research objectives
The research aims to reveal the factors that influence student attendance at the lower secondary
education level in Srah Srang Cheung Village and Tayaek Village. Since the promotion of Education for All,
Cambodia has also made significant progress in increasing enrollment rates and completion rates at the primaryeducation level. However, the progress at the secondary level is limited.

Figure 1-1. Dropout Rate by Grade in Cambodia

Source: USAID School Dropout Prevention Pilot Program29

According to the data from USAID, the dropout rate between grade 7 and grade 9 is relatively highcompared to other grades (see Figure 5-1). Therefore, we focus on students at lower secondary school to find out
not only the factors influencing their attendance, but also the differences and commonalities of factors between
the two villages.

1-4. Research questions
In order to obtain the above research objectives, we developed the research questions as a basic
framework. The main research questions are as follows:What are the factors that influence students’ attendance at the lower secondary school level in Srah Srang
Cheung Village and Tayaek Village?

What are the differences and commonalities of the factors between the two villages?

How do these factors influence the difference in attendance respectively?

2. Research methodology
2-1. Research site
Our research sites are located in Srah Srang Cheung Village and Tayaek Village, both of which belong
to Siem Reap Province, Cambodia.

30

There is a significant difference between these two villages regarding their economic situations. The
location of Srah Srang Cheung is near the famous tourism sight of Angkor Wat. Benefiting from its
advantageous geographic position (see the map below), the service industry has become an important source of
local people’s income. On the contrary, Tayaek Village belongs to a remote rural region where agriculture is still
the main source of income. It is for this reason that the education situations in these two villages are very
different from each other.

2-2. Interviewees
The table below demonstrates the number of interviewees we chose for in-depth interviews in Srah
Srang Cheung Village and Tayaek Village. (see Table 6-1.)

Table: 2-1 List of In-depth Interviewees
Commune Chief
Village Chief
No. of Families
Schools
Teachers
Students

Srah Srang Cheung Village11
131
2 (M1, F1)
6 (M3, F3)

Tayaek Village
11
121
6 (M3, F3)
6 (M3, F3)

Source: Authors

We first conducted interviews with two commune chiefs to acquire the basic economic and education
situation of the communes as a whole. As the commune chief suggested, we also interviewed the village chiefsof Srah Srang Cheung and Tayaek Village. Since the students who have dropped out usually have to work, andthe period we visited the field was during summer vacation for schools, we decided to conduct the student
interviews by visiting the houses of students in secondary school. In Srah Srang Cheung Village we interviewed
13 families, and in Tayaek Village 12 families were interviewed. For the in-depth interview at school, we
selected one student from each grade to get detailed information about their family backgrounds and education
situations.
In addition to the in-depth interviews, we also distributed questionnaires and organized group interviews.
(see Table 6-2 and Table 6-3) In Srah Srang Cheung Village, we conducted a group interview with 44 students
from grade 7 to grade 9, of which 10 were male students. In Tayaek Village, we distributed questionnaires to 30
students, of which 9 were male students and 21 female students.

Table: 2-2 List of Group Interviewees by Grade
School Location
Srah Srang Cheung Village
Tayaek Village

Grade 7

Number of Students
Grade 8Grade 9

29
8

7
8

8
14

Source: Authors
31

Table 2-3 List of Group Interviewees by Gender
School Location
Srah Srang Cheung Village
Tayaek Village

Number of Students
Male
10
9

Female34
21

Source: Authors

3. Literature review
3-1. School dropout in Cambodia
There have been some empirical studies conducted to identify the causes of dropping out in Cambodia,
focusing on perceptions of the respondents through interviews, such as the Report on the Assessment of the
Functional Literacy Levels of the Adult Population in Cambodia (2000). According to the report, 37.5% of themales and 43.6% of the females did not answer the questions. Those who responded cited two main reasons fornot continuing their formal schooling: their parents’ poverty and the need for the respondents to assist theirfamilies. Other reasons were family migration and distance to school. Only 0.4 % of the males and 0.3% of thefemales stated that schooling was not useful. As little as 0.4 % of the respondents were not satisfied with theirteachers.
The World Bank (2005) mentions that poverty, late school entry, inequality, low availability of schools,
poor school management, low monetary incentives for teachers, low community participation, poor school
facilities, low quality of teachers and geographical disadvantage are the main reasons for dropout. In addition,even milder forms of child labor (children’s work activities) are cited as factors that may increase their tendency
towards failure, repetition, or dropout altogether. UCW (2007) also listed 16 kinds of hazardous forms of childlabor described in the National Plan of Action against Worst Forms of Child Labor (NPA-WFCL). For example,
work on rubber plantations, work on tobacco plantations, work on semi-industrial agricultural plantations,handicrafts and related enterprises, restaurants, small business and guesthouse work, street begging and flower
as well as souvenir selling are listed.
Kim (2009) argues that many Cambodian policy makers support policies toward combining basic
education and child labor that are not evidence-based. His paper suggests that it is necessary to reconsider theassumptions that child labor is inevitable, and that combining work and schooling is the best way to ensure
access to a basic education for children.
As a result of the study conducted in five primary schools and five lower secondary schools in ruralparts of Kampong Cham Province, No and Hirakawa (2012) concluded that poverty and child labor (amount oftime children spent helping their families), which were often cited by the majority of teachers, government
officials, and in research findings as the main causes of dropout in Cambodia, did not show any significant
influence on the odds of dropout. Their study showed that repetition and low achievement were the main causesof dropout throughout primary and lower secondary levels.
The survey data focusing on perceptions of the respondents through interviews only show their32

perception of reality, which is different from actual facts. Even if the students say they like their schools andteachers, it does not mean that the school facilities are appropriate. Also, some data are lacking specifics. For
example, the data doesn’t specify what “far” means.

3-2. Educational situation in Siem Reap province
Table 3-1: Schools, Classes, Students and Staff
Number of Schools
Number of Classes

864
5,773
237,777
116,491
13,949
5,811
4,712
2,642
1,176
414
5,888
3,056

Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
FemaleTotal
FemaleTotal
FemaleEnrollment
Repeaters
Teaching Staff
Non-Teaching Staff
Total Staff

Source: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-2012

Table 3-2: Secondary Schools, Classes, Students and Staff
Number of Schools
Number of Classes
Number of Classrooms
Enrollment
Repeaters
Teaching Staff
Non-Teaching Staff
Total Staff

101
1,111
996
53,843
27,682
1,147
370
1,720
762
329
107
2,409
869

Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
FemaleTotal
FemaleTotal
FemaleSource: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-2012

Table 3-3: Enrollment and Repeaters by Grade
Enrollment in Grade 7
Repeaters in Grade 7
Enrollment in Grade 8
Repeaters in Grade 8
Enrollment in Grade 9
Repeaters in Grade 9

Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
Girl
Total
Girl

14,988
7,969
284
104
11,505
5,999
188
72
9,555
4,902
352
123

Source: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-201233

Table 3-4; School Age Population and Sex-Ratios
Total
Girl

Aged 12-14
Sex-Ratioof(Aged 12-14)

68,89533,478Population

105.8

Source: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-2012

Table 3-5: Indicators regarding Secondary Schools
Pupils per School
Teachers per School
Staff per School
Buildings per SchoolRooms per School
Classrooms per School
Classes per School
Percentage of Schools

533.1
17.0
20.3
2.3
11.9
9.9
11.0
68.3
47.5
21.8

2-shift
w/o Water
w/o Latrine

Source: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-2012

Table 3-6: Indicators regarding Secondary Students and Staff
Pupil Teacher Ratio

31.3

Pupil Staff Ratio

26.3

Pupil Class Ratio

48.5

Pupil Classroom Ratio

54.1

Classes per Classroom

1.1

Classroom Area (m2) per Pupil

3.6

Percentage ofPercentage of Female in

Non-Teaching Staff

16.1

Female Staff

42.4

Teaching Staff

44.3

Non-Teaching Staff

32.5

Source: Education Statistics and Indicators 2011-2012

Literacy Rate
The Literacy rate in Siem Reap Province has considerably improved from 40% to 80% due to thefollowing reasons. To begin with, Education for All (EFA) contributes the most to this significant progress. As
the EFA plan claims that education is a fundamental human right, various issues of education are emphasized,
including adult literacy and gender equality. International organizations, donors and the government of
Cambodia have been working together in the whole process of planning, implementation and monitoring to meet
the target provided by EFA since 1990. Secondly, as non-formal education, the local government has beenrunning literacy class to eradicate illiteracy. NGOs are also involved in literacy classes, which contribute to34

decreasing the illiteracy rate in Siem Reap Province.

3-3. Educational situation in Srah Srang Cheung village and Tayaek village
Table3-1. Educational Situation in Lower Secondary Level
Srah Srang Cheung Village

Tayaek Village

Schools1

1

Teachers

6

Students (Female)

316

6
2

286 (148)

3-4. Chronology of schooling, the Khmer Rouge and schooling abolition
During the 12th century, the temple educational system in Cambodia grew around Theravata Buddhism,
which became the established religion toward the end of 1430 under Thai influence (Encyclopedia Britannica,2013). Pagoda schools were established to teach moral ethics, literacy, and to give advice about life. They wereopen for males only (Dy,S.S., 2003). Since the advent of the French in 1863, educational development in
Cambodia was neglected. Clayton (2005) and some scholars argue the French purposely restricted education for
Cambodians in order first to achieve and then to maintain power in the colony. By the 1964-1966 National
Literacy Campaign initiated by Prince Norodom Sianouk, 1,176,466 people out of 1,257,694 who wereregistered as illiterate became literate (MoEYS, 2000). The total population of that time was about 7 million
people.
The regime of Democratic Kampuchea known as Khmer Rouge or the Pol Pot regime seized power in
1975. After that, Cambodia experienced mass devastation of individual property, the formal schooling system,and social culture. The Khmer Rouge destroyed education in Cambodia by eradicating educational infrastructureand killing former teachers.	
  Under the regime, between 75 and 80 percent of its educated population teachers,
students, professionals and intellectuals were killed or fled. In regards to secondary education, almost half of thenation’s 148 schools were closed. Further, the Khmer Rouge murdered many primary and secondary school
students (Ayres, 1999; Sideth, 2003).

4. Findings and analysis
4-1. The perceptions of the schools
Established in the village in 2011, the Srah Srang Junior School opened and started its functions in thesame year. Being a relatively new school in the village and built at a central place, it became very convenient fora large number of students to attend. Since it was just started two years ago, the class for 9th grade had not yet
started at the time of this research. According to the school plan, it is scheduled to open the next semester. At
present, it is the only lower secondary school in the commune. Its low enrollment rates are in part affected by its
particular location near to a world heritage spot, which in some cases makes students neglect their studies in
2

The lower secondary school in Srah Srang Cheung Village incorporate the students from several villages.
35

order to spend more time devoted to selling activities in and around the tourist sites. In other cases the effect ispositive because some students have the motivation to become professional tour guides once they finish school.
The Tayaek Kumagai Kiyoo Junior School was established in the village in 2009. As with the Srah
Srang, according to teachers and some of the surveyed students, it has been very convenient that the school
opened in the village because students who live far have an easier and faster commute. The Tayaek Junior
School is the only lower secondary school in the commune and for this reason a good number of its students
come from the 4 neighboring villages. Being located in a remote rural area, its lower enrollment rates are mainly
because of poverty and lack of resources of the villagers. The implementation of an enrollment campaign has
started this year.

4-2. Perceptions from the results of the questionnaires and interview to the children
For the question, “why do you want to go to school?” 74 students served as a sample of the survey, of
which 44 were from Srah Srang JS and 30 from the Tayaek JS. They were given the question and instructed torank their preferences regarding the reason of their attendance. In Srah Srang JS, 36 students which represents
81.8% of the total, ranked “to get a better job” as their first preference. The next preferred reason was “because I
like studying,” chosen by 32 students and representing 72.27% of the total. The last preference was “to get ahigher diploma”, ranked third by 31 students, representing 70.5% of the total.
As for the 30 students from Srah Srang LSS, the option “to get a better job” was ranked first by 29
individuals, representing a 96.7% of the total. The next preferred reason was “To become what I want to be,”chosen by 27 students and representing 90.0% of the total. The last preference was “because I like studying,”
ranked third by 22 students, representing 73.3% of the total.
To try to get a better job seems to be the main reason and strong motivation for students to go to school.
In both cases, this preference is as much as 80 percent, with a difference of 14 points in the percentage from one
school to another. This could be explained by the fact that students at Srah Srang JS probably have better accessto information on the importance of having a higher income due to its location near a tourist area. It seems thatthe students like to study since this preference is seen in both cases. Students also seem to realize that getting ahigher diploma is relevant and crucial for purposes of getting a better job, as ranked the third preference in thefirst case.

Table4-1. Reason of attending school
Question: why do you go to school?
Srah Srang (44 students)

Tayaek (30 students)

1

To get a better job 36 (81.8%)

To get a better job 29 (96.7%)

2

Because I like studying 32 (72.7%)

To become what I want to be 27 (90%)

3

To get a higher diploma 31 (70.5%)

Because I like studying 22 (73.3%)
36

The second question posed to the same two groups of students was. “what do you want to be in the
future?” This time they were instructed to mention one desired profession or occupation. From the 44 students at
Srah Srang JS, 16 of them or 36.4% of the total, including a male individual among them stated that they want tobecome a doctor or a nurse. The perception is that these jobs are the most desired because of the lack ofprofessionals in the village, and as stated by the interviewees, these are supposed to be the most well paid jobs
among others. This result seems to make sense with the result from the previous question, where the majority ofthem aim for a better job. Marking 31.2% of the total, 14 students answered that they would like to becometeachers. This profession, as the second most desired job, was given preference because as interviewees
indicated, a teaching job seems to offer stability of income and a special status in the social circles of society inthe village, while being a very well respected profession.
Further, 18.2% represented by 8 individuals answered that they want to become tour guides. Being a
tourist area this occupation seems to provide the chance of getting a good job in an easy, fast and practical way.
Relating this result to the previous questions, the interviewees who expect to become guides are almost the sameas those who answered that they go to school because they like to study. In this case, they like to study English,
the culture and history of the country, and interacting with foreign people. Six interviewees representing 13.6%of the total percentage answered other professions as their desired occupation for their future.
The second question posed to the students at Tayaek JS had higher expectations for becoming teachers.
Ten out of the 30 interviewees, 33.3% of the total, answered that they want to become a teacher. When asked
about the reason for choosing the profession, they replied that a teacher is both very well regarded, and that ateaching job gives a one a special status in the village. On the other hand, it seems that the students realize tosome extent the lack of teachers in the village, and some of them stated their vocation of a career in the
education sector. The desired job by 8 individuals, and 26.7% of the total as the second most preferredprofession was becoming a doctor or a nurse. Corresponding to the previous school, most students stated thatthey would like to have a job in the medical sector with the main reason being that such jobs offer a good
income and social stability. The second reason is that they are aware of the lack of professionals in this fieldwithin their commune, which leads to an increase in the number of sick people. Among them, some stated thatthey opted for this career because at home they had sick family members and wanted to do something about it bybecoming a professional in the field. Becoming a tour guide was the third desired profession as was becoming a
police officer. These two professions, chosen by 3 students making each a 10% of the total respectively, seemed
to have a certain preference among the interviewees. Those who wanted to become guides stated that there is ademand for this profession and at the same time it would be a practical way to have a good income. When asked
about the reason for wanting to become a police officer, some the other 10 interviewees said that the social
problem of cheating and conning is a serious issue in the commune, thus they would like to fight the problem aspolice officers. On the other hand, for some it was because of the income stability and social security that this37

profession provides. The remaining 6 students, represented as 20% of the total, declared that they want tobecome professionals in other fields.

Table4-2. Future vision
Question: what do you want to be in the future?
Srah Srang (44 Students)

Tayaek (30 Students)

1

Doctor/Nurse 16 (M1) (36.4%)

Teacher 10 (M1) (33.3%)

2

Teacher 14 (M1) (31.8%)

Doctor/Nurse 8 (M1) (26.7%)

3

Guide 8 (M2) (18.2%)

Guide 3 (M0) (10%)
Police 3 (M3) (10%)

Others 6(M5) (13.6%)

Others 6 (M5) (20%)

4-3. Perceptions from the results of the interviews with the parents
The first question in the interviews with the parents was to find the reasons for sending their children toschool. For this purpose, 12 households were interviewed in Srah Srang Village, and another 12 in Tayaek
Village. They were instructed to rank the reasons. Ten families in the Srah Srang Village and 8 in the Tayaek
Village mentioned as one of the main reasons “to get knowledge.” After being asked why it is important for theirchildren to get knowledge, in most cases it was mentioned how relatives or some members of the village fell
victim to cheating or being indebted by fraudulent transactions by loan sharks. In any case, they believed thatthese people usually got in trouble because of their low level of education and lack of understanding for issues
such as debts. Further, they believed that not thinking in a critical way also made them vulnerable targets. The
second reason, to get a better job, was mentioned by 7 families in the first village and 12 in the second one. Allof them stated that they want their children to get a better job and not to have the same jobs their parents had.
They mentioned the hardships and struggles that people without a proper education have to go through, and they
don’t want their children to experience the same suffering as they did. To get a higher diploma was mentioned inboth villages. While talking with the interviewees, it was evident that most of them recognized the importance of
education and the relevance of possessing academic certification, not only for the benefits that they provide, butalso for the social recognition among the villagers, and for the reputation that the family will gain when amember becomes an educated person. Learning morality seems to be very important among villagers. Thisanswer, given by ten households out of the 24 families in both villages, shows that the issues of morality for abetter living and understanding of what is right and wrong is a matter of importance.
In the interviews with the parents, we also asked the question “Why don’t you send your children toschool?” Poverty was raised as the primary reason in both of the villages. Most of the parents answered thatpoverty made their children drop out from school, because they needed their children to work and support their38

family. We also asked “If you had money, would you send your children to school?” to which all of the parents
answered yes. This shows that the parents want to send their children to school, but they can’t because they arepoor and cannot afford to send their children to school.
Table4-3.Reason of not sending children to school
Question: Why don’t you send children to school?
Srah Srang(9Families)

Tayaek(8Families)

1

Poverty 9

Poverty 3

2

Transportation 5

Failure of Exam 3

3Family Issues 3

Marriage 1

4

Marriage 2

Transportation 1

5

Failure of Exam 2

Family Issues 1

Another important reason was failing exams. This is not exactly why parents don’t send their children toschool, but it shows that failing exams is a big issue. When going on to the next grade, students need to pass an
examination. If the student fails, he or she needs to do the same grade for another year. This eventually leads todropping out. One of the parents felt that her child wouldn’t be able to pass the exam even if she studied foranother year, so she decided to make her child work instead of going to school. But failing exams is not only thestudent’s problem. It is possible that lack of textbooks or classrooms leads to the low quality of education, which
eventually causes students to fail the exams. So, failing exams can’t only be considered a lack of attitude
towards education, but many factors are involved.
Transportation is also one of the main reasons why parents don’t send their children to school.
Transportation includes distance and bicycle problems. Distance can be one of the main issues. We interviewed
parents who have children that dropped out before the school was established in 2011 in Srah Srang. One of theparents mentioned that before the school was established, her children had to go to a school in the Siem Reap
town, which takes over an hour by bicycle. This was too far, and her child could not continue to go to school,
since there was fear of getting involved in a traffic accident. Bicycles are another issue regarding children
dropping out. There are many children that need a bicycle to get to school since it is too far to go by foot.
However, bicycles are not cheap and many families can’t afford to buy one. Even if the family is able to afford abicycle, some don’t have money to repair the bicycle after it breaks. Bicycles break very easily since they aren’tvery well made, and the roads are not paved so bicycles can’t withstand the bumpy roads.
There were also many family issues raised in the interviews. One was the illness of a family member,especially the mother or the father. When one of the parents becomes ill, children need to work in order tosupport the family. Sickness is not a very rare issue in Cambodia, and this causes children to not attend school
and instead stay home to work. There are also other family problems including the parents’ disappearance.
The interviews with parents show that poverty is the base of all problems relating to the attendance ofchildren in lower secondary school. Poverty leads to transportation problems, family problems, and examination
39

problems. However, it cannot be assumed that if we reduce poverty, then the attendance rate will increase. There
are many issues involved, and raising the attendance rate is not a simple issue.

4-4. Perceptions from the interviews with stakeholders
Table4-4. Attendance rate of lower secondary school
Question: What is the attendance rate of lower secondary school?
Commune Chief

Village Chief

Teacher, Director

Srah Srang

Not sure

100% Attendance

95% Attendance

Tayaek

70% Attendance

Not sure

80% Attendance

In an interview with stakeholders, we asked questions about the children’s attendance of lower
secondary school. The interview was held with 3 stakeholders from each village; the community chief, village
chief, and the director, as well as some teachers at the lower secondary school.
For Srah Srang Village, we received answers from the village chief and the director of the lower
secondary school. The village chief answered that almost 100% of the children attend lower secondary school.
He mentioned that the establishment of the lower secondary school in 2011 was the biggest reason for children
to attend school. Before 2011, children had to go to a nearby village or to the center of Siem Reap city to go tosecondary school. However, since the school was established inside the village, it made it easier for the children
to attend school. Although the village chief was not aware of the exact percentage or the number, he was surethat most of the children go to secondary school. Even though there is a very high attendance rate, he alsomentioned the many issues surrounding the educational situation of the village.
The first issue was the lack of classrooms. Although the school was established, there are not enoughclassrooms in which everybody can study. Therefore, children take turns going to school, so that some go in themorning, and some go in the afternoon. Thus, children are not able to study at school for the entire day. Relating
to the issue of classroom shortage, the village chief also mentioned the 9th grade class. Since the school wasestablished only in 2011, the 9th grade does not exist yet, and 9th grade classes may not open if the school cannot
secure a space for 9th graders. Later, we found out from the director of the secondary school that the 9th grade
will open in the following year.
Another issue the village chief mentioned was the relationship between the development partner and the
local authority. A few years ago, there was a development partner in the village that funded the establishment ofa school. However, the problem was that there was no land on which to build, and they could not get permission
from the authority. Later, when permission was given to build a school on a certain piece of land, thedevelopment partner had already left, and they had no money to build a large school. First, there was money but
no land, then, there was land but no money. The village chief was very disappointed about this issue. He statedthat had either the relationship or timing went well, there would have been a larger school, which would have40

increased attendance.
An interview was also held with the director and teacher at the lower secondary school in Srah Srang
Village. The teacher answered that about 95% of the children attend lower secondary school. This is not exactly
the same from the village chief’s answer, but it shows that a high percentage of children attend lower secondary
school. The main reason for the relatively high attendance rate is the fact that the school was established inside
the village, but this is not the only reason. Another reason that the teacher mentioned was the encouragement
teachers provide for the children’s parents towards education. According to the director, the main reason for
dropout is poverty. When families can’t afford to send children to school, children tend to quit school and work.
However, teachers at the lower secondary school visited the families that have poverty issues, and encouraged
the parents to send their children to school. This action not only encourages parents, but it develops a firm andreliable relationship between the school and the community. The relationship leads to a better understanding andtrust towards education, which leads to a higher attendance rate. Even so, the teacher and director mentioned
several issues regarding education.
The first thing the teacher mentioned was the lack of materials for learning. There are not enoughtextbooks for everybody, and many children can’t afford to buy stationary that is necessary for learning. On theother side, the director mentioned the lack of teachers at school. There are only 6 teachers at school that teach
316 children. This means each teacher must teach over 50 children. Also, each teacher needs to teach more than
2 subjects. This may lead to the low quality of education, which may eventually cause dropouts. Therefore, eventhough there is a relatively high attendance rate in the secondary school in Srah Srang, there are still many issues
regarding the educational situation.
For the attendance of the lower secondary school in Tayaek Village, we could get answers from thecommune chief, as well as the director and the teachers at the school. The commune chief mentioned that about
70% of the children attend lower secondary school. According to the commune chief, the main reason that 30%of the children don’t attend school is poverty. Since the children’s families are very poor, they cannot afford tosend their children to school. There are many examples demonstrating how poverty leads to dropping out.
Without money, children cannot buy stationary or things they need to learn at school, and some children may
need to work in order to support their family. The commune chief also mentioned migration as one of thereasons for not attending school. Migration is very closely linked with poverty. The reason children migrate is tofind jobs and support their families. Migration may be either external or internal. For external migration, themost popular destination is Thailand, which is the closest in proximity and one of the richest countries inSoutheast Asia. For internal migration, the most popular destination is Siem Reap, where many find work, suchas in construction.
The director mentioned that one of the major reasons for non-attendance is poverty. This is common for
all of the stakeholders we interviewed. Other than poverty, the director mentioned the influence of parents. By
influence, it didn’t mean that the parents don’t care about education or don’t want to send their children toschool. Interviews with parents revealed that many of the parents did not finish school and dropped out at early41education levels. This is due to many reasons, for example the Pol Pot regime, which banned all education.
Children see their parents grow up and live a life without completing an education. Although the parents want
their children to attend school, children see their parents and think that they can live without having an education.
This is one of the influences of parents that make children drop out from school.
Teachers also mentioned the attendance issue in lower secondary school. One of the teachers mentionedthat students’ personal problems are also one of the issues. Personal problems include laziness or lack ofmotivation towards education. Many, but not all children believe that education is better for their future. Somechildren think that it’s better to earn money than go to school. This leads to a decreased attendance rate.

4-5. Three important issues
From the results of questionnaires and interviews, we found people’s perspectives on schooling. In thissection, we discuss in more detail the following three issues that we thought have the greatest influence onchildren’s attendance.

1. Distance
In both villages, Lower Secondary Schools (LSS) opened in the villages in recent years. In Srah Srang
village, the LSS opened two years ago with classes of seventh and eighth grade, and the ninth grade’s classopening in the next year. In Tayaek Village, the LSS also opened in 2009.
In Srah Srang Village, according to the village chief, the enrollment rate has risen from around 50% toalmost 100% compared to before the LSS was established in the village. During the interviews, we met one
student who didn’t have a bicycle and couldn’t go to school if the LSS wouldn’t have opened in the villages. We
also heard that the attitude of parents toward schooling also has changed. The Srah Srang Village chief said
some parents came to encourage their children to go to school after the establishment of the LSS. One student
said “when school was far, parents didn’t agree to send us to school” because a long commute requires a bicycle,
which is a burden for the family financially. Also in Tayaek Village, students mentioned that schools used to befar, and it was one of the reasons children couldn’t continue to go to school. The Ministry of Education
mentioned that the situation of schools regarding the distance is getting better because schools and houses arelocated closer than before, which is one sign of progress.
In some cases, when there is no need for schools, simply placing schools near to houses may not beeffective. But in these two cases, we found that people want to go school if they can, and establishing schools
nearby houses can help them to attend school. As mentioned in the part of results of questionnaire, “for futurejob,” the occupations that many children in these two villages desire, need education. Even in Tayaek Village, inwhich most adults are engaging in agriculture, no child stated that she/he wanted to become a farmer. We foundthat people think schooling helps them to get better job and better life, and the needs for school are very high.
The questionnaires were distributed in the LSS and the results came from only the children who were
continuing to attend school, so it may be biased in some degree. However, when we visited the families in the42

villages, there were many children who had already dropped out of school, and we could hear the opinions ofthese children as well.

2. Influence of parents
As many researchers have pointed out, there is a great impact from parental influence on children’s
schooling, (World bank, 2008). Theoretically, school enrollment and dropout rates are determined by ahousehold’s demand for education and the supply of education services (Connelly and Zheng, 2003). Demands
for education are different according to the parents’ understanding the importance of education.
In the two villages of Cambodia where we conducted our fieldwork, like in other developing countries,
household poverty is a major factor keeping many children out of school. Under that situation, parents often
have difficulties in affording to send their children to school, and if they also think schooling is not important,they are likely to force their children to withdraw. Especially in Srah Srang Village, since the location is nearby
a tourism site, there are a lot of opportunities to gain money and some parents want their children to quit school
and do part time jobs. On the other hand, when parents recognize the importance of education, they also can be apositive influence to encourage their children to go to school.
One female student in Srah Srang Village said that some parents tempt children to quit school by tellingthem that they can earn money if they work instead of attending school, and also tell them that they can only getbenefits of schooling in the remote future. Furthermore, once they start to do part time jobs and gain income,they gradually lose interest in schooling. On the other hand, in the case of the student interviewed, her parents
and especially her mother, was the person who strongly encouraged her to go to school. Her mother told her that
if she sells souvenirs, she could get money, but it is a tentative activity and couldn’t be her future job, so she
must keep on studying to get a better job.
When we asked the directors of LSS in two villages, neither director raised parenal influence as one ofmain reasons for dropping out. However, they did recognize that improving parent’s understanding about theimportance of education really helps to encourage student to go to school and to decrease the dropout ratio. In
the both villages, teachers strongly encouraged children in the classroom. And not only in the classroom, they
visited houses directly and explained the importance of education to parents for children who are likely todropout and/or who already had dropped out but had the chance to come back to school. They thought thatchanging the attitude of parents was an efficient strategy for reducing the dropout rates.
As mentioned in the literature review, Cambodia had a tragic experience during the Khmer Rouge
period. During the period, almost half of the 148 secondary schools in the country were closed. The Khmer
Rouge destroyed education in Cambodia by eradicating the educational infrastructure and killing former
teachers (Ayres, 1999). Presently, there are still many illiterate people in Cambodia. Most parents in bothvillages had few, if any, schooling experiences because of the Khmer Rouge. Some parents mentioned that theywanted their children to go to school because they don’t want children to be illiterate like themselves. But they43

could not realize other benefits of education other than just obtaining literacy. One mother in Tayaek Village
said that she could not imagine what education brought to her son because she had no experience. The commune
chief of Tayaek also said that since most of the adults in the village were illiterate, children tended to think they
could live good enough without education like their parents and din’t recognize the importance of schooling.
From the situation of two villages, we could find out how the parents’ attitude toward education has agreat influence on their children’s schooling in both direct and indirect ways, and it can have either a negative or
positive impact.

3. Relationship between child labor and dropout
As introduced in the literature review part, there is much research about the causal relationship between
child labor and dropout rates. While some people say that even softer forms of child labor (children’s work
activities) are factors that may increase their tendency towards failure, repetition, or dropout altogether, otherresearchers say there is no significant influence of child labor on dropping out. One researcher even says thatchild labor is inevitable and it is necessary to consider how to combine work and schooling.
What can we say from observing the cases of these two villages? In Srah Srang Village, many children
have part time jobs. Actually, 5 out of 6 students whom we asked in the group interview had a part-time job.
They usually worked after school, weekends, and during their long vacation periods. Most of them helped therestaurants in the village or sold souvenirs on the road in front of village or tourism sites. On the other hand, inTayaek Village, no one among the 6 students who were interviewed had part time job. This was because, themajor job opportunities in the village were working on potato farms and the work areas were far from theirhouses, requiring many hours on the farm. This is a different situation from Sra Srang Village in which children
could work for just several hours after school. In Tayaek Village, there were no available jobs that could be done
after school. Thus in Tayaek, children had to choose between going to school or working. If there were any
financial problems and they had to help their family, they had no other choice than to give up schooling.
As shown in the results of the interviews, according to the stakeholders, it seems that the enrollment
ratio was better in Srah Srang Village than in Tayaek Village. Considering that motivation and needs forschooling were almost the same in these two villages, it seems that job opportunities did not necessary have only
a negative impact on children’s schooling. It could be said that a part time job, which has compatibility withschooling, could work as a kind of “cushion” that would help to reduce the possibility of dropping out becauseof the family’s financial problems. Children in Srah Srang Village could work and help their families and alsoearn money for their studies by themselves without giving up schooling. In Tayaek Village, there were no job
opportunities that worked as a “cushion”, so children were forced to quit school when parents could not afford it.
The relationship between child labor and dropping out seemed to depend on what kind of job opportunities wereavailable, or if the job had compatibility with schooling, allowing children to continue attending school andwork for family at the same time.

44

5. Conclusion
The biggest factor is poverty in both villages, but still there were many other factors, which directly
influenced student’s attendance at school. The opportunity for “part-time jobs” was the factor that seemed toinfluence the difference of attendance between the two villages. In tourist areas, with many opportunities to get apart-time job, there were two options when the family couldn’t afford to support their children to go to school;
either quit school, or to go to school and work part-time. In agricultural areas where there were no chances ofgetting a part-time job, there was no choice but to quit school when the family couldn’t afford to support thechildren to go to school.
Limitations of our research include the short time period (one week) to conduct interviews. Because ofthis time limitation, we could only interview with a limited number of families and students. Additionally, we
could only interview in two villages in different communes. The students in the secondary schools came fromseveral villages and unfortunately we could not interview the families of the students coming from other villages.
The biggest limitation of our research was that we could not interview with the children who have dropped out
from secondary school. We did get some information about the students' brothers and sisters who have dropped
out from school, but the amount of the information about dropout children was very little compared to that ofchildren attending to school.
After our research, we would like to provide a few recommendations. Preparing scholarships for themost needy students, building more schools near households in order to reduce the issue of the distance toschools, lending bicycles and developing bicycle repair services for the students would help those who live faraway from schools and in turn, may encourage parents to send their children to school. In addition, providing
opportunities to gain side income, may work effectively in increasing the attendance to schools. These are someof the suggestions we would like to make, after going through our research.

6. Acknowledgments
Foremost, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to our adviser Prof. Fujimura and Prof. Veara
for the continuous support and constant encouragement throughout the fieldwork. We would also like to express
our appreciation to all the people who kindly gave us their precious time to respond to our queries during thefield work in Cambodia, especially the Board of Education, commune/village chiefs and families in Tayaek andSrah Srang Cheung, the teachers and the students at Tayaek Kumagai Kiyoo Junior School and Srah Srang
Junior School. Finally we cannot express enough thanks to our RUPP counterparts, Mr. Kong Sopheak and Ms.
Rineth Sen for their insightful suggestions, support, and patience.

45

7. References
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport. (2010). Education Strategic Plan 2009-2013. Phnom Penh.
Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport. (2012). Education Statistics & Indicators 2011/2012. Phnom Penh.
The World Bank. World Development Indicators.
http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/reports/tableview.aspx
Retrieved on November 7, 2013
Anres,D.1999.”The Khmer Rouge and Education: Beyond the Discourse of Destruction.” History of Education
28, pp.216-225
Clayton,T.(1995).Restriction or resistance? Educational development in French colonial Cambodia. Educational
policy Analysis Archives,3(19),1-14
DY, Sideth S.2004. Strategies and Policies for Basic Education in Cambodia: Historical Perspectives.
International Education Journal Vol5, No1, pp.90-97
DY, Sideth S. NINOMIYA, Akira.2003. Basic Education in Cambodia: The Impact of UNESCO on Policies in
the 1990s.education policy analysis archives, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 48, Dec. 2003. ISSN 1068-2341. Available at:<http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/276/402>. Date accessed: 01 Nov. 2013.
MOEYS,2000,Report on the Assessment of the Functional Literacy Levels of the Adult Population in Cambodia
NO Fata. HIRAKAWA, Yukiko.2012.Identifying causes of dropout through longitudinal quantitative analysis inrural Cambodian basic schools. Journal of International Development and Cooperation,Vol19,No1,2012,
pp25-39
UCW,2007. Mapping &costing current programmes targeting the worst forms of child labour. Working Paper.
November 2007. Available fromhttp://www.ucw-project.org/attachment/child_labour_Cambodia_mapping20110628_132040.pdf (accessed on
05 November 2013)
USAID.2011.School Dropout Prevention Pilot Program Dropout Trend Analysis: Cambodia
World Bank.(2005,January) Cambodia: Quality basic education for all. Available fromhttp://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEAPREGTOPEDUCATION/Resources/cambodia_efa_jan05.pdf(accessed on 05 November 2013)46

Working Group 3
The Paradox of the “Thailand Dream”:
Understanding Migration from the
Perspective of Rural Women in Cambodia
1. Introduction
2. Problem Statement
3. Significance of the Study
4. Research Objective and Research Question
5. Methodology
6. Findings
7. Analysis
8. Conclusion
9. References
Appendix

Group Advisor
Professor Wataru Kusaka
Written by
Cho Mar Naing**,

Kato Ami *,Daytoc Herminigildo Lariosa,

Rustia Marie Dominique,

Makita Mariko,
Le Thi Huyen,

Ojeda Echeverria Jose Mauricio, Nong Monin** Group leader*Group Sub-leader
47

The Paradox of the “Thailand Dream”: Understanding Migrationfrom the Perspective of Rural Women in Cambodia
1. Introduction
Migration is a population movement, encompassing any kind of movement of people, whatever its
length, composition and causes; it includes migration of refugees, displaced persons, economic migrants, andpersons moving for other purposes, including family reunification (IOM, 2004). Amid the tidal wave ofglobalization, it is increasing in scale and nature, becoming a visible phenomenon. As estimated 214 million
people are migrating worldwide, which means 3.1% of the world population are migrants. In addition to that we
can also see a feminization trend in global migration (IOM, 2010).
At the international level, there is no universally accepted definition for "migrant”. The United
Nations defines “migrant as an individual who has resided in a foreign country for more than one year
irrespective of the causes, voluntary or involuntary, and the means, regular or irregular, used to migrate” (UN,2009). Under such a definition, people traveling for shorter periods as tourists and businesspersons would not be
considered as migrants. However, certain kinds of shorter-term migrants, such as seasonal farm-workers who
travel for short periods to work to plant or to harvest farm products, are included in the common usage.
In Cambodia, migration is an growing development issue. Having emerged only recently from a civil
war that lasted more than three decades, Cambodia is a new entrant to the phenomenon of internationalmigration. With the country’s rapid economic growth, starting from in the early 2000s, the number of migrants
crossing the border has been rapidly increasing since the late 2000s. This implies the growth has not createdsufficient job opportunities for the large pool of young people and adults who are eager for work. For
Cambodian migrants, the top three destinations are Thailand, Malaysia and South Korea. According to figuresfrom the Cambodian Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training, there were a total of 90,000 Cambodian
people migrating between 1998 and July of 2011 through officially recognized channels. Among them, some
36,000 went to Thailand, some 45,000 to Malaysia and the rest of them went to South Korea (Yamada 2012).
However, it is estimated that there are more than 200,000 Cambodian migrants in Thailand and among them,
180,000 are living or working there in an irregular situation, which is becoming a concern for the Cambodian
government (Bloch and Chimienti 2011).
From a legal perspective of the admission criteria, migration can be classified into two types: regularand irregular. The former refers to migration that occurs through recognized, legal channel, whereas the latter ismovement that takes place outside of the regulatory norms of the sending, transit and receiving countries.
Migrants that infringe on a country’s admission rules and remain in the host country as an unauthorized
person, lacking legal status in a transit or host country due to the expiration of his or her visa, is called an48

irregular migrant3.

2. Problem statement
Despite its prevailing negative image, more and more Cambodian migrant workers have come to use theirregular process, which has a higher probability of exploitation and is considered dangerous compared with theregular process of migration. Several factors such as cheap costs and simple procedures, as well as the growing
number of recruitment agencies and middlemen providing migration assistance to Cambodian workers goingabroad, make irregular migration attractive. In addition, there seems to be a network among migrants, which canpromote this process.

3. Significance of the study
Although there have been numerous studies on women migration in Cambodia, few of them focus on
the perspective of irregularity. Therefore, this research seeks to understand the phenomenon of migration in thecontext of Cambodia specifically, to analyze why women migrants prefer irregular migration to regularmigration.
Moreover, for a long time irregular migration has been interpreted as a problem, leading research toadopt policy perspectives and suggest solutions on this ‘problem’ (Bloch and Chimienti 2011). However, thisstudy tries to understand the issue of irregular migration as a result of each migrant’s ‘rational choice’ despite
the disadvantages of the irregularity, which reflects the reality observed in the field.
Based on the findings, this study hopes to provide information to relevant organizations and future
researchers in the field of migration. Furthermore, it attempts to provide recommendations on how to better
address the needs of women migrants in order to prevent irregular migration and provide them protection whenworking overseas.

4. Research objective and research question
4-1. Research objective
Given the situation in which Cambodian women migrants choose the irregular way, despite the risks
and costs, we would like to identify the reasons for choosing irregular migration rather than regular migration
among women, specifically.

4-2. Research question
Why do woman migrants choose irregular migration rather than regular migration?

3

The term "irregular" is preferable to "illegal" because the latter carries a criminal connotation and is seen as

denying migrants' humanity.
49

5. Methodology
5-1. The research site
The research site covers two villages, Boeng Vien Village and Trav Bak Village and both are part of the
Tayaek Commune, South Nikom District, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. Based on the data from the Tayaek
Commune Profile 2012, there is a clear difference between these two villages in terms of the numbers ofinternational and internal migrants. As shown in Figure 1, Trav Bak Village has more internal migrants thaninternational migrants, whereas in Boeng Vien Village the situation is the opposite. For this reason, these twovillages were chosen to be the research site.
Boeng Vien has a population of 1,017, comprising 196 households with an average household size of
5.2. There are 99 migrants of which 23 are women. The primary occupation for the village is agriculture,
wherein 90% of its population is engaged in it.

Figure 1: Number of International and Internal Migrants in the Villages

Source: Tayaek Commune Profile 2012

Trav Bak has a population of 1,686, comprising 368 households with an average household size of 4.6.
There are 140 migrants of which all are women. Like its neighboring Boeng Vien Village, 90% of its inhabitants
depend on farming as a major source of livelihood.

5-2. Research approachThis research paper uses both descriptive and qualitative approaches to better navigate the research
objectives presented earlier in this paper. This approach is primarily useful when the study describes thecharacteristics of a specified problem area (Lekvall and Wahlbin, 1993). Since migration of women in ruralvillages of Cambodia has already been occurring for a period of time, part of this study describes the50socio-economic situation in rural areas that compel women to migrate.
The qualitative approach is used when the study seeks to understand and interpret variations or
flexibility observed in complex problems (Lundahl and Skavard, 1999). It facilitates deeper investigation as well
as offers the researchers freedom when analyzing the results of the in-depth interviews. Through this approach,
we want to explore why women in the rural villages of Cambodia migrate in search for jobs outside theirvillages or country. Subsequently, we want to know why Cambodian rural women choose the irregular way overthe mechanisms set up by the government to facilitate migration. These matters shall be discussed in the findings
and analysis section of this paper.

5-3. Data collection
The primary data for this study was gathered through in-depth interviews. Except for the migrants andnon-migrant villagers in the research site, the respondents from the various offices were already pre-determinedin order to ascertain that the data and information to be collected is related to the intended study. This involves
key informants from the Department of Labor and Vocational Training and the Department of Women’s Affairs
in Siem Reap Province and the village chiefs of the two villages. Purposive and snowball sampling were utilized
by the study to identify and locate additional women migrants for the in-depth interview.
Secondary data was also used in this study to broaden the sources of information related to the study ofinterest (Ghauri et al, 1995). In this study, we acquired some general information, namely the migration statistics
of Cambodia from academic and government institutions of Cambodia. For the statement of the problem,
research objective and questions, as well as the discussion and analysis of this study, a wide range of literature
was reviewed.
Figure 2: Destination of Migration

Source: Authors

6. Findings51

6-1. Migration destination
As shown in Figure 2, among 34 women migrants interviewed in the villages of Boeng Vien and Trav
Bak, 88% of them migrated to work in Thailand, followed by 9% to Siem Reap and 3% to Poipet. Economic
factors were the main reason they chose Thailand rather than other places in Cambodia.

6-2. Economic reason
Thailand is known as one of the leading economic countries in Southeast Asia and is classified as a
middle-income country in which people can earn at least 150 THB (USD $5) a day. Thailand adopts a minimum
daily wage policy of 300 THB(USD $10) a day4, which came into effect on January 1st, 2013. The daily wagein Thailand is much higher than that of Cambodia, which is about USD $2.67 per day. On average, women who
migrate to work in Thailand can earn 200 -250 THB (USD $6 – 8) per day in the primary sector, which is higher
than that of Cambodia at USD $2.5 -5 per day.
The economic structure of Thailand is shifting gradually from the primary sector to the secondary andtertiary sectors, which demands high-skilled labor from within the country, while hiring low-skilled labor fromneighboring, lower-income countries. The official data from the Thailand government illustrates that there areapproximately 2.5 million low-skilled workers in the country. These workers are employed in ‘3Ds jobs,’ socalled because they dirty, dangerous, and demanding. Among them, 60% are unregistered migrant workers fromother countries such as Myanmar (75%), Cambodia (20%), and Laos and others (5%)5.
Cambodia is considered a low-income country where it is difficult to find jobs and earn money,
particularly in rural areas. Rural people cannot do anything apart from farming and selling labor, which provide
them with unstable yields and incomes. Since most people in the villages are poor with little to no education, theopportunity to find jobs in cities or towns has become challenging, especially in Siem Reap City, a famous
tourist destination that demands high-skilled labor.

6-3. Other reasons
Aside from the economic factors, there are other reasons, such as hoping for new experiences andaspirations, the presence of strong networks in Thailand and the geographical proximity of Cambodia to
Thailand. Some respondents said that they are looking forward to having new experiences and possibly
receiving higher wages when working abroad.

In addition, because of strong networks, such as relatives or

co-villagers, in Thailand,it facilitates their experience and process of migration.
Figure 3 illustrates some of the reasons why women in the villages migrate. Interestingly, 50% of
women in Boeng Vien village migrate to find a high-paying job as the main reason, followed by getting out ofpoverty and looking for a job at 15% and 10%, respectively. In contrast, in Trav Bak village, the majority ofwomen migrate in search for a job at 42%, followed by finding a high-paying job at 33% and getting out of

4

http://asiafoundation.org

5

http://www.english.panglong.org	
  52

poverty at 17%. Compared to Boeng Vien, there seems to be less job opportunities in Trav Bak, which is locatedin a more remote area with less economic activity and poor physical infrastructure.
Figure 3: Reasons of Migration

Source: Authors

6-4. Educational attainment of migrants
Further, according to the village chief, access to education remains an issue for the people of Trav Bak
where around 80% of villagers are illiterate. Out of 13 respondents, 8 women migrants never went to school andonly one woman completed grade 7, which is the highest level among them. Compared to Trav Bav, women
migrants in Boeng Vien had a higher level of education. The majority of them finished secondary school and of
one them completed high school. The number of illiterate women is also lower at five in Boeng Vien village(See Figure 4).
Figure 4: Number of Respondents Completing Education by Grade

Source: Authors53

6-5. Type of jobs during migration
Many families in the village are categorized as poor to very poor and they do not own either a house or a plot of
land. Furthermore, from the field survey, most of the women migrants from Boeng Vien village work inindustrial sectors such as factories that produce household items, garment and fish processing industries, as wellas construction. On the other hand, migrants from Trav Bak work in agriculture related-sectors, such as rice
fields, sugar cane fields, and lobster farming, where the labor fee is relatively low and requires long hours ofwork (See Figure 5).

Figure 5: Number of Respondents Having Jobs during Migration

Source: Authors

6-6. Type of migration
Figure 6 illustrates that women migrants in both villages prefer irregular migration to regular migration
at 55% and 45%, respectively. The percentage of women migrants who use irregular channels to cross theborder in Trav Bak is higher at 92 % compared to 32 % in Boeng Vien. Trav Bak is considered an impoverishedvillage characterized by poor physical infrastructure, such as lack of schools and health centers. Most of the
migrant women’s families do not own land, which results in the whole family having to migrate.
Most poor families prefer irregular to regular migration because it is cheap, less time consuming andconvenient, while regular migration is expensive, takes too much time and is complicated for the poor with lesseducation. For instance, with the irregular method, they spend USD 75-100 for brokerage and transportation feesfrom the village to the work place in Thailand, while with the regular way they spend USD $250-300 for a54

passport, visa and other-related documents.
Figure 6: Type of Migration

Source: Authors

6-7. Advantages and disadvantages of international irregular migration
The present findings focus on the positive and negative aspects of irregular migration in Cambodia. The
reason for this is to present the reasons and motives of Cambodian people in crossing the border between
Thailand and Cambodia. It is a well-known fact that the journey by illegal methods is never pleasant, involving
human trafficking and cases of migrants who are abandoned by brokers in the middle of the trip. These migrants
must consequently find their own way to reach their destination or come back home while trying to avoid theThai police.
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies presents a list of common
disadvantages of being an irregular migrant: threats to physical integrity, welfare and fundamental human rights
exploitation and abuse, human trafficking, economic hardship, discrimination, difficulty accessing social, legal
and humanitarian assistance, social and psychological isolation and conflicts with national immigration laws
leading to prosecution and detention.
The table below presents a summary of the findings from the interviews with the villagers of Boeng
Vien and Trav Bak, concerning the positive and negative aspects of irregular migration:

55

•
•
•
•

•

•
•
•
•
•

Negative aspects
Human trafficking
Irregular migrants not being paid the agreed wages
Arrested due to lack of legal papers. (Fined and sent
back to Cambodia)
Marginalization and subjection to abuses while
unable to access social services because avoiding
authorities is the only way to secure their clandestine
status.
Child’s education of migrants:a) Migrant parents leave their children in thehome country if there are people to look after.
b) Cannot send children to school given theirillegal status.
To pay the brokerage fee; most migrants take loans
or incur debt to the broker.
Smuggling fees and cheating in Thailand.
Migrants working on fishing boats
The case of illegal construction workers
Threat of arrest by the Thai authorities

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Positive aspects
Fast track access to Thailand
Network/connections and viable prospects forfinding work
Information exchange
Sense of (social) security
Sending remittances
Short-time, low cost and more beneficial,simple process
Higher expectation of success in terms ofgetting jobs and more earnings
Flexibility

In other words, irregular migrants face many dangers like sexual violence, organized crime, assaults,
informal jobs without any contract or social security, low wages, poor working conditions, rejection andmarginalization, as well as denied access to social services like education or health.

7. Analysis
This research analyzes the process and experience of migration from a bottom-up approach, particularly
from the perspective of the rural women migrants of Cambodia. The findings of this study revealed that there isa gap between the policy and the actual situation in which policies of the state could not serve the ordinary
people well in terms of addressing their needs. In this respect, women migrants in Cambodia trust informal
networks rather than state or formal institutions.
However, we are not discounting the fact that informal networks can also be exploitative because
irregular migration has its disadvantages as well. Albeit the costs, risks and challenges involved in irregularmigration, after doing a cost and benefit analysis we found that these women migrants nonetheless prefer theirregular way.
This is because the benefits and net returns of choosing the irregular way far outweigh the costs andrisks. It is the irregular way that is more accessible and can serve their needs immediately given thecircumstances. Thus, on this basis poor women migrants will decide, negotiate and assert themselves within the
structure they live by choosing what works best to enable them to pursue better lives, or their vision of a ‘good
life.’In addition, the strong network connections played a very important role in reducing the costs and risks
and even the perpetuation of irregular migration. This constitutes a kind of social capital that women migrants
56

can rely on to gain access to employment overseas. It provided them social security, hence decreasing the
economic, social and psychological costs of migration (De Haas, 2010).

Analytical Framework

Pull Factors
 Increase inindustrial sector
 Social network

Push Factors

Women Poor farming land

Migration

 Poor standard oflivingpressure Low income

 Perception of status

 Weak family

increasestructure High standard ofDecision of Low education

Migrationliving Family reasons

Regular

Cost

Irregular

Migration

and Benefit

Migration

Analysis

Socio-economic structure
NetworkFlexibility
State Services

According to Putnam (1993), social capital refers to the “features of social organization such as trust,norms and networks that can improve efficiency of society by facilitating coordinated actions for mutual
benefit” (p 167).

Accordingly, it is argued that social capital is key towards economic progress, government

effectiveness, political stability and making democracy work (ibid.). It is because social norms of generalized
reciprocity and social networks reduce uncertainty and incentives to defect while it encourages social trust andfacilitates cooperation and collective action that can promote economic and democratic institutional performance(ibid). Furthermore, the social contract that sustains such cooperation and collective action is not legal but moral,
in which the sanction is not penal but rather exclusion from the network of solidarity and cooperation (ibid.).
Thus, in contrast with the prevailing assumption in the literature that social capital fosters democracy
and the rule of law, in this study it appears that social capital is independent from the state, which in some ways
57

infringes on state law. This is because people don’t trust formal or state institutions since they cannot convey
their aspirations and deliver their expectations. Hence, the lack or absence of social trust and mutual confidence
hinders cooperation and collective action that can be beneficial to both the state and the people. The poor
women’s strategy of choosing irregular migration somehow reinforced by their networks (social capital) means
they have created a kind of social order or condition favorable to them and autonomous from the state.
Therefore, it is important that the state delivers services that are better than the informal networks
utilized by rural women migrants of Cambodia. If the state and formal institutions could address the needs of thepeople sufficiently, migrants would choose the formal way, which could offer them stability and security, andpossibly state regulation and the rule of law could be more efficiently and effectively implemented.
Moreover, the way the state regulates and implements policies and laws obscure the real problem,
which is the unequal socio-economic structure and access to government services that pushes the poor to defy
laws to make ends meet in their daily lives.

8. Conclusion
This paper highlighted the disadvantages for those who migrate irregularly. In doing so, we do notdeliberately propose specific new goals for the eradication of irregular international migration, but rather
provide new perspectives and some recommendations that could be helpful to rural woman migrants in
Cambodia.
In Cambodia, most migrants choose irregular migration to regular migration because of the strong
accessibility to social networks, low cost, simple procedure, higher expectation of success and flexibility.
Although this is also coupled with disadvantages and can be exploitative. Nevertheless, after calculation of costs
and benefits, women migrants will still choose the irregular way.
Thus, it is important to rethink laws and state regulations to be friendlier to the marginalized sectors of
our society, such as the poor women migrants. The government needs to provide proper and sufficient
information for safe migration that reaches down to the rural village level. It should also establish a mobile
center to issue passports around Siem Reap and the main cities in Cambodia. The state has to provide better
services to the poor in comparison to the informal networks. Repressive policies and walls between countries
that have not prevented irregular migration have diversified modes of illegality. However, despite the limiting
condition in which they live, women migrants continue to assert themselves in order to pursue their dreams of
having a better life, whether in their home country or outside its borders.

58

9. References:
Alice Bloch & Milena Chimienti (2011) Irregular migration in a globalizing world, Ethnic and Racial Studies,
34:8, 1271-1285, DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.560277
Amie Gaye and Shreyasi Jha- United Nations Development Programme, Statistics Unit. 2011. Measuring
Women’s Empowerment through Migration. UNESCO. ISSN 2079-6595.
CDRI-Cambodia’s Leading Independent Development Policy Research Institute. 2011. Cambodia Development
Review, Volume 15, Issue 3. Phnom Penh: CDRI Publication.
De Haas, Hein. (2010). The Internal Dynamics of Migration Processes: A Theoretical Inquiry. Journal of Ethnic
and Migration Studies, Vol. 36 (10), 1587-1617.
Heng Molyaneth. 2012. Forum of International Development Studies:South-south Cross-border Migration: Evidence from Cambodia.

Poverty and Migrant Selectivity inJapan: 名古屋大学大学院国際開発研究科.

IOM - International Organization for Migration. 2004. International Migration Law Glossary in Migration.
Switzerland: IOM Publication
Kingdom of Cambodia Nation Region King. 2009. National Committee for Sub-National Democratic
Development: Siem Reap Data Book GIS code 17. Phnom Penh: National Committee for Sub-National
Democratic Development.
Lee Chen Chen. 2006. United Nations Development Fund for Woman: Cambodian Women Migrant Workers:
Findings form a Migration Mapping Study. Cambodia: UNIFEM – Project Office.
PEPY-Fostering Youth Leadership in Rural Cambodia. Statistics Yearbook. 2011. Siem Reap Angkor,
Cambodia: Publisher (PEPY – Promoting Education emPowering Youth.
Province Planning Department. 2013. Commune Profile Year 2013 for local development Management.
Cambodia: Province Planning Department.
Putnam, Robert. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
USAID From the American People and The Asia Foundation. 2011. Cambodia’s Labor Migration - Analysis of
the Legal Framework. Phnom Penh, Kingdom of Cambodia: The Asia Foundation.
Vutha Hing, Pide Lun and Dalis Phann- Philippine Institute for Development Studies. 2011. Irregular Migrationfrom Cambodia: Characteristics, Challenges and Regulatory Approach. Phnom Penh: CDHI Publications.
World Bank. 2005. Measuring Empowerment Cross-Disciplinary Perspective. Washington, DC, USA: WorldBank Publications.
山田美和編(2012)『東アジアにおける人の移動の法制度』,調査研究報告書，アジア経済研究所

59Appendix (Case Studies)
Case Study #1
Age: 24
Marital Status: Married
Family Members: Husband and one son
Education: Grade 7
Occupation: Household item factory
Workplace: Thailand (2 times)
Duration: 7 months the 1st time, 1 year the 2nd time
The respondent is an experienced worker in Thailand. She went to Thailand two times to work. She told
us that she migrated to Thailand because she was very poor, and she wanted to earn more money for the family
so she decided to go to work in Thailand.
When she went to Thailand for the first time, she was single. She went through the legal way, whichmeans with a passport according to her. She had to borrow money from other people to pay company agency
fees. She ran back from her job after 7 months because of the bad working conditions. She worked in a factorythat produced household items.
After getting married, she and her husband decided to work in Thailand again. She told us they chosethe illegal way this time because of her previous experience. She said that the legal way takes time to wait. Also,
they could not afford the cost for two people.
She lives in her sister’s house in the village. When we met her, it had been 2 months since her returnfrom Thailand. She came back to give birth. Her husband was working in Thailand.
When we asked how she knew about the job, she told us that there are some women who are working in
Thailand and she could ask them. She and her husband only needed to pay some transportation fees to the man
whom they call the middleman.
She worked in a livestock farm together with her husband. She told us she could earn higher wages so she wassatisfied with her work in Thailand.

Case Study #2
Age: 30
Marital Status: Married
Family Members: Husband and one daughter
Education: Grade 9
Occupation: Fishing Factory
Workplace: Thailand
Duration: 3 months
We interviewed the respondent in her house together with her husband. She looked like a strong and60

active woman. According to her, she ran back from Thailand one month ago. She explained to us that she
migrated to Thailand because she was poor. Before she went to Thailand, she was a farmer and she worked
together with her husband. Her husband is also a farmer. They have a farm. But she wanted to earn more money
for the family so she decided to go work in Thailand.
Her husband told us that he agreed with her decision, as he could work in the farm in the village while
she earned more money by working in Thailand.
When we asked how she knew about the job, she told us that she knew some women who are workingin Thailand and she asked them. She told us she could not afford the cost of the legal way, which was about
US$ 300, so she chose to go through an informal network. She also said that if she chose the legal way, there
was no guarantee that she could go.
She worked as a factory worker in a fishing factory in Thailand. The working hours were 12 hours a day
and on some days, she had to work 3 hours overtime. She lived in a room provided by the company together
with other workers. The living condition was very bad according to her. When we asked her if she was satisfied
with her work experience in Thailand, she said she wasn’t satisfied because of the low salary and poor living
condition. She said she didn’t get the full rights of a worker because of her illegal status. Therefore, she ran backfrom her job and she escaped luckily. She said she will not go to Thailand again through the illegal way.
She told us that she realized the life of an illegal worker in Thailand is very difficult and she cannot
endure it, after working 3 months in Thailand. That is what made her run back to Cambodia.

Case Study #3
Age: 38
Marital Status: Married
Family Members: Husband and 7 children
Education: Illiterate
Occupation: Construction worker
Workplace: Thailand
Duration: 1 year
The interviewee we met in the village was the migrant’s sister and she is looking after her sister’schildren. The migrant is working in Thailand with her husband and two elder sons. According to her sister, themigrant was very poor and both she and her husband had no job in the village. They needed money because theirdaughter has a disease that requires an operation. Therefore, both of them decided to migrate to Thailand to earnmoney for their daughter’s medical fees. The interviewee said that they made the adventure for their daughter.
When we asked her sister how they went to Thailand, she said to us they went through an informal
network. There was a middleman in the village and he could provide the job information in Thailand. They
could also collect information about working conditions in Thailand from other villagers who were alreadyworking in Thailand.
61

According to the interviewee, her sister has been working at a construction site in Thailand for about
one year. She also told us that her sister’s family can earn 200 baht (around US$ 10) per day per person. They
brought money for their children when they came back. She told us they already have come back twice to see
their children.
When we asked her if she knew the living condition in Thailand, she told us that the company where hersister is working also provides accommodation and they are living there. According to her sister, the living
condition in Thailand is very good compared to Cambodia, and they are satisfied with their working lives there.
However, her sister said they will not stay in Thailand permanently. They will come back when they can savesome money for their daughter’s medical fees after working 2 years.

Case study #4
Age: 24
Marital status: Single
Family members: Parents, 4 sisters and 1 brother (she is the 4th child)
Education: None
Occupation: Garment factory worker
Workplace: Thailand
Duration: year: 2 years
The interviewee went to Thailand from 2011 to 2013 in order to search for a job with a higher wage.
She went to Thailand through a legal agency, which she knew about through an advertisement. She visited theagency with a group of around 20 women. Initially, she was afraid of going to Thailand but since there were also
other women in the group who already had experience migrating, she felt more comfortable to go.
She had to contact the authority in Phnom Penh before leaving the country.
When she went to Thailand in a group, each group member worked at the same place. They stayed close
to each other so they could take care of each other. She said the job contract was written in English but since
there was a translator for them she could understand the content in Khmer. She worked 8 hours each day startingfrom 7 am until 4 pm and was paid 300 baht per day. When she worked over time until 9 pm, she received 500
to 600 baht per day. Salaries were paid monthly. The factory owner and the team leader were both nice. She
lived with 2 other roommates in a room with a rent of 1,000 baht. She is satisfied with her job in Thailand. She
sent remittances home through the bank. During her two-year stay in Thailand, she visited home only once.
When she missed her family, she called home.
After working in Thailand for almost 2 years, she came back to Cambodia before her visa expired. She
will migrate to Thailand again next month. This time she will work for 4 years, as she made further
arrangements to extend her stay. Her next occupation in Thailand has not been confirmed yet, as it depends onthe contract with the agency. She is planning to take her younger sister with her, as she recommended her sisterto go. Some of the other women who went last time will also join. She said “If I stay at home, I can live with my62

family but if I go work in Thailand, I can earn more money. So, I would rather go to Thailand to work instead ofstaying in Cambodia.”
Before migration she did not know how to speak Thai, but after working there for around 2 years, she
was almost fluent in Thai, though she could not write letters. She can also speak English now. Her aim is to savethe remittances to run a small shop of clothing and other small products in the future. She said she is confident
enough to run a business because of the migration experience.
================================================================
17 September 2013 Notes / 8:30am
Interview with the Director and Deputy Director of
Department of Labor and Vocational Training
Dara Reng Sey Hotel, Siem Reap Cambodia

The officials interviewed said that the Labor and Employment document for Siem Reap could provide
basic information like Labor Force and Labor Participation Rate of men and women but it is still in the making.
Thus, there is no data they can give regarding this matter at that time.
In the case of overseas and local migration, it is done with the government involving a memorandum of
understanding for both foreign and local companies. The concerned company shall first register with thegovernment authorities in order to engage the services of workers. To date, Siem Reap has 33 registered local
companies that employ workers, while 20,000 of its people migrated to Thailand for work.
In terms of its vocational training provision function, the officials said that there are two (2)government-owned training centers operating in Siem Reap’s Administrative District. Thus, its
trainee-beneficiary coming from the other six (6) districts will come to the centers based on the referral orrecommendation of the village chiefs and other local authorities to receive training. The targeted individuals are
women, widows, former soldiers, people with disabilities, those belonging to poor families and families withmany children. The centers offer training mainly on vehicle repair, sewing, beauty tips and agriculture related
activities.
Information needed to be obtained further: The Name and Address of the two mentioned training
centers.
==================================================================
17 September 2013 / 3pm
Meeting with Commune Council Members
Ta Yaek Commune, Siem Reap Cambodia
Ta Yeak Commune has a population of 6,383 ofwhich 2,254

are female. It covers 9 villages with 83

groups and 2,349 households.
In terms of overseas migration, there are 642 who migrated to Thailand of which 253 were women. On
the other hand, there are 229 who migrated to other provinces of which 99 were women. The migrants are63categorized into three: (1) legal, (2) illegal, and (3) risky. Among the migrants they prefer to work in Thailand
because of big earnings.
We asked if they could identify returnee or repatriated former migrants for interview in succeeding days
during the research period in the commune, and the council expressed their willingness to facilitate and assist.
==================================================================
17 September 2013 / 10:30am
Interview with the Director of Women’s Development Center
Mrs. You Sophear
WD Center, Siem Reap, Cambodia
Established in February 16, 2010, the Women’s Development Center in Siem Reap Province aims totrain 400 women every year. The target beneficiaries are women who are poor, widows and those with physicaldisabilities. For the villagers to receive training at the center with free food and accommodation, women mustenlist themselves with the commune officials for possible selection. The Center is also giving commune-base ormobile training to the villages for the convenience of the interested woman applicants. The center caters to an
average of 2-3 walk-in women clients who seek assistance every week according to the director.
After training, concerned women are referred to companies for possible employment while others haveto utilize acquired skills for individual economic endeavors. The Women’s Development Center is part of the
National Government’s Women Plan in connection to their commitment to the Millennium Development Plan.
The plan covers 5 major objectives: (1) economic development though the provision of skills training; (2)women education and behavior change; (3) women and teen-age health against HIV/AIDS; (4) legal protection;(5) women’s involvement in politics and governance.
To ensure that such major concerns be integrated in each local levels’ respective development plans, thegovernment crafted and introduced the Gender Mainstreaming Program through the Women’s Development
Center.
When asked why most of its migrants are women, the director replied that first, there are more womenthan men in their population and second, because it is demand-driven as companies prefer to employ women
rather than men.
When asked further why women migrate overseas rather than working locally, the director stressed that
it is due to salary considerations because they earned more overseas. When asked whether the center was able tocater to returnee or repatriated migrant women, the director recalled that they had not trained any yet.
==================================================================
17 September 2013
Department of Women’s Affairs
Siem Reap Province
Ms. You Sophea
Director64

Question 1:

I would just like to ask if it is included in the file about general information on Cambodian rural

women such as their access to education, health services and nutritional information etc.
Answer: In Siem Reap province, there are 11 districts, 1 city, 100 communes and 875 villages(official/registered). But, it is estimated that there are around 20,000 migrants in Siem Reap alone.
Note: See file and other sources.
Question 2: Who are the targeted participants for the women development centre?
Answer: The poor, widows, orphans, and women with disabilities.
Question 3: Are there any participants from other provinces?
Answer: No there are no other participants from other provinces. Trainings are organized based on the demandof the commune investment plan, then the participants for these trainings are selected by each commune
councils but within the same province. In addition, the commune investment plan is prepared every three years
starting April to July.
Question 4:

When was the centre established?

Answer; It was established on 16, February 2010 funded by the Japanese Government through ADB.
Question 5: How many women have received training provided by the centre?
Answer: The centre trains 400 people every year.
Question 6: What is the arrangement regarding the trainees?
Answer: Women who live in faraway places stay at the centre while women who live nearby come to work
every day. In addition, 2 meals are provided (lunch and dinner) for the trainees.
Question 7: How many staff is working in the centre?
Answer: There are 7 full-time staff and 10 contractual staff.
Question 8: Where are the markets for the products? Do you sell it locally or internationally?
Answer: Some products are sold locally and some are exported to Thailand and Japan through the GIZ(Gesselschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit) program component. For example, rugs used to be exported to
Canada until the financial crisis in 2009. Thereafter, they shifted to domestic production (local market in Siem
Reap) but because there is no demand due to its high price, they stopped producing the rugs completely in 2010.
Question 9:

What other programs are provided by the centre?

Answer: The Neary Rattanak III focuses on the following five strategic areas:
1) Economic empowerment of women – Provision of skills for women through vocational training to generate
income. Encourage them to access credit and formulate self-help groups.
2) Education of women and girls, attitudes and behaviour change – Encourage girls to complete at least grade 9
which is aligned with the Cambodian Millennium Development Goals (CMDGs). The Department of Women
Affairs cooperates with some companies and NGOs to provide scholarships to girl students and dormitories.
*Note: Traditionally in Cambodian society there are gender biases against women so through the Neary
Rattanak II program they would like to change the attitudes and behaviour towards women. In this way they canalso be a part of the country’s economic activities.
653) Legal protection of women and girls – Legal protection against women and child trafficking, sexual
harassment (including rape) and domestic violence. The Department of Women Affairs play the role of a legal
agent to take good care of the victims while the Judicial Police take the legal action with the criminal or suspect.
4) Health and nutrition of women and girls, and HIV/AIDS – Raising awareness about reproductive health togirls and women. Also, child care education to pregnant women.
5) Women in public decision-making and politics – Women are encouraged to be candidates in the provincial,
district and commune council elections.
In the Department of Women Affairs (DoWA) there is another gender mainstreaming program and under thisprogram there are a number of mechanisms for such as the following: Committee of Women and Child
Consultation, offices in each district, as well as centre in the commune. The gender mainstreaming program is
not only integrated into the provincial development plan, but also the commune development plan. Moreover,
DoWA also tries to integrate gender mainstreaming programs into NGOs and other partners. Furthermore,gender mainstreaming is also included in national policies. The implementation of this program is according to
the CMDGs and National Strategic Development Plan (NSDP)
Question 10: What is the status of the participants?
Answer: The participants are poor, orphans, widows and women with disabilities. The proportion of single,
married and widow participants are approximately equal.
Question 11: What is the role or responsibility of the staff of the Department of Women Affairs (DoWA)?
Answer: The DoWA has 3 working groups which are the economic development (job assistance), legal
protection (legal assistance) and gender groups (gender mainstreaming).
Question 12: How many people ask for assistance from the DoWA monthly?
Answer: 2-3 cases monthly. Due to the gender mainstreaming awareness, violence against women decreased
while the complaints increased.
Question 13: Why is the number of female migrants higher than male migrants?
Answer: It is because the population of women is higher than men. Also, there is a high demand for female
labour force (e.g. garment factory worker in Phnom Penh).
Question 14: Who supports the operation of the Women Development Centre?
Answer: The Japanese government supported the construction of the building while operation and management
is under the Royal Government of Cambodia. Before, the training took place in the centre but now the training isdone in the participant’s community. After the training, the participants are employed in Artisan Angkor,
Japanese textile companies, other private companies, or sometimes they run their own businesses. Other
participants produce their own products in their communities and sell them to the centre.
Question 15: To what extent can the centre reduce migration?
Answer: The centre has a small contribution to the reduction of migration. However, the number of migrants has
decreased from 20,000 to 9,000. To reduce migration, the Royal Government of Cambodia and DoWA
particularly cooperate with companies to set the minimum wage at $80 USD (Siem Reap) for the workers. While66

the DoWA cannot stop migration, they encourage them to at least have a safe migration.
Question 16: Between the male and female migrants, which group has more savings?
Answer: Of course, women and some families prefer their women to migrate because they can save more thanmen.

Interview guidelines for migrants
1) Name/Nickname
2) Age3) Gender4) Education level5) What was your occupation before migration?
6) What was your occupation during migration?
7) What was your occupation after migration?
8) What kind of migration process (regular or irregular) did you go through?
9) How long did you stay there?
10) What was your purpose of migration?
11) How long were the working hours per day?
12) Were you satisfied with your work?
13) How was the living condition during migration?
14) How is the living condition now (after migration)?
15) How did you contribute to your family expenses before migration?
16) How did you contribute to your family during migration (through remittances)?

Interview guidelines for non-migrants
1) Name/Nickname
2) Age3) Gender4) Education level5) What is your occupation?
6) How long are you working per day?
7) Are you satisfied with your work/life?
8) How do you contribute to your family expenses?
9) What is the reason you are not migrating?
10) What kind of image do you have towards women migrants?

	
  
67

	
  

Working Group 4
The Contribution of Souvenir Business in
Siem Reap Community: Income, Employment
and Living Conditions
1. Background
2. Literature review
3. Scope and limitation
4. Methodology
5. Conceptual framework and data analysis
6. Results and discussion
7. Conclusions
8. Recommendations
9. Acknowledgements
10. References

Group Advisor
Professor Tetsuo Umemura
Written by
Ravindra Deyshappriya**,

Erika Hernandez*,

Shiva

Ram,
Ryda Chea,

Salah Uddin,

Farawahidah A. Ghani, Sun Jie;

Theodore Maggay Velasco,

Wang Xiao Jing** Group leader*Group Sub-leader
68The Contribution of Souvenir Business in Siem Reap Community:
Income, Employment and Living Conditions
Abstract
This study is an in-depth analysis of the contributions of tourism-based souvenir businesses on income,
employment, and living conditions of the community within and around the Angkor Wat heritage site in Siem
Reap, Cambodia. The study first describes the role of the local tourism industry in Siem Reap Province in theeconomic development of Cambodia. It aims to point out the impact of tourist arrival earnings of Siem Reap as a
tourist destination on the gross domestic product of the country. Using comparative analysis, this study
establishes the similarities and differences between sellers and producers in the souvenir business in terms ofincome, employment, and living conditions. It further compares the findings of the study with the baseline data
provided by the Siem Reap Provincial Government.
In conclusion, the study summarizes the contributions of the tourism-based souvenir business to the
local community in the Angkor Wat heritage site in terms of three major points: First in terms of income, thisbusiness is the main source of living and it is said that the income is sufficient to meet basic needs such as food,clothing, and shelter. Second, with regard to employment, the majority of the population in the community is
engaged in the souvenir business. Finally, in regards to living conditions, the people engaged in souvenir
business, whether as producers or sellers, have better living conditions than those in the other sectors, but onlywith regard to use of electricity, presence of toilet, attendance in schools, and house ownership.

69

1. Background
The Kingdom of Cambodia consist of 23 provinces divided into 159 districts, 26 municipalities andPhnom Penh, which is considered the administrative office and capital of the country. Since the 30th ofApril 1999, Cambodia became one of the Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN). Until September 2013, the total arrival of foreign tourists had increased 28% compared toprevious years, and the domestic tourist arrivals had also increased 15% compared to the year 2011. In
2012, it hosted 2.8 million international tourists, earning US$1,912 million for the country with aparticipatory rate of 12% of GDP. The forecast for the year 2015 is that tourist arrivals will reach 4.5
million.
Siem Reap is a province in the northern region of Cambodia, situated 314km from the Cambodian
capital, and it is where Angkor Wat, a UNESCO World Heritage Site is located. Angkor Wat is one of the mostsignificant tourism destinations in the world, and more specifically in the Asian region. The tourism industry in
Cambodia does not differ from other tourist destinations in the world. On this premise, the Royal Government of
Cambodia considers tourism as one of the four pillars of its national economy, together with the agriculture,
textile, and construction sectors. It anchors its tourism strategies and policies on its promotional slogan,“Cambodia: Kingdom of Wonder” (UNWTO- Asia Pacific, 2012).
Many developing countries utilize tourism to help in their development. Therefore, tourism is not only
to satisfy international tourists’ needs and desires, but also to improve the quality of life for local people and to
improve regional economic development.

Table 1: Background information of Cambodian provinces
Province

CapitalPopulation

Banteay Meanchey

Serei Saophoan

678,033

Battambang

Battambang

1,036,523

Kampong Cham

Kampong Cham

1,680,694

Kampong Chhnang

Kampong Chhnang City

472,616

Kampong Speu

Kampong Speu

716, 517

Kampong Thom

Kampong Thom708,398

KampotKampot627,884

KandalTa Khmao

1,265,805

Koh Kong

Koh Kong

139,722

Kratié

Kratié

318,523

Mondul Kiri

Sen Monorom

60,811

Oddar Meanchey

Samraong

185,443

Preah Vihear

Phnom Tbeng Meanchey

170,85270

Prey Veng

Prey Veng

947,357

PursatPursat397,107

Ratanak Kiri

Banlung

149,997

Siem Reap

Siem Reap

896,309

Sihanoukville

Sihanoukville

199,902

Stung Treng

Stung Treng

111,734

Svay Rieng

Svay Rieng

482,785

Takéo

Takéo

843,931

PailinPailin70,482

Kep

Krong Kep

40,280Source: National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Cambodia.

2. Literature review
Tourism has grown to be one of the world’s largest economic sectors. International tourist arrivals grewfrom 25 million in 1950 to 1,035 million in 2012. The market share for emerging economies increased from30 % in 1980 to 47 % in 2012. In 2011, tourism accounted for 255 million jobs worldwide. Thus, the total
impact of the industry in 2011 was a contribution of 9% of the total GDP, or a value of over US$6 trillion(UNWTO, 2013).
The surge of the tourism industry surge in Cambodia is not different from the rest of the tourist
destinations in the world. In 2012, there were 2.8 million international tourists generating US$1,912 million forthe country, which participated to 12% of the GDP. On this premise, the Royal Government of Cambodia
considers tourism as one of its four pillars of national economy, together with the agriculture, textiles, andconstruction sectors, and anchors its tourism strategies and policies on its promotional slogan, “Cambodia:
Kingdom of Wonder” (UNWTO- Asia Pacific, 2012).
Siem Reap Province illustrates the tourism potential of Cambodia, which relies heavily on the presenceof Angkor Wat. Adding another feather to its cap, Siem Reap was declared as the “Cultural City of East Asia”
on 10 July 2012, on the occasion of the “13th Meeting of the Foreign Ministers of ASEAN”, held in Phnom Penh,with China, Japan, and South Korea. The tourism income for Siem Reap represents the lion share of the total
tourism revenues of Cambodia (UNDP Jobs, 2012). Ironically, the province is the 9th poorest province inCambodia out of 24. In 2010, it had 31.1 % of its population (920,120 people) living below the national poverty
line, a figure that is significantly higher than the latest estimated national average of 26.1 %.

The UN World Tourism Organization lists twelve (12) major products and industries that arise outof the tourism industry. A study of country-specific tourism indicates that characteristic goods andactivities use local knowledge and resources. In any tourist destination, this is the most practical activity
that local people can engage in taking into consideration the simple fact that it does not require much in theway of capital, social networks, required skills or education. This knowledge is autochthonous and is part71

of the culture that has been transmitted from one generation to another.

Hence, there are employment

opportunities for the local population because of their capabilities of being natural craftsmen and artisans.
In addition, the local people can find additional income and employment from developing local
characteristic goods and services related to tourism.
Thus, the local community can experience the so-called fair benefit distribution out of theirindigenous knowledge. Souvenir shops ranked No. 4 of the main jobs created by tourism in Cambodia(Sokhom, Pak 2009). The “Old Market” (Phsar Chas) and vendors used to be the limited sources ofsouvenirs but they are currently facing competition with the boom of new shops, galleries, and boutiques.
To this day, the “Old Market” still offers the widest variety of souvenirs and showcases the best selectionof items such as baskets, silver work, and musical instruments. However, the boutiques, galleries andspecialty shops sell better quality items.
There are local manufacturers of souvenir items as well as foreign traders, who usually come from
China, Vietnam, or Thailand. There is an advantage of foreign traders over the locals because they have thebest locations for their shops and networks to promote their business. Therefore, the Angkor Handicraft
Association (AHA, a non-profit business association aimed at strengthening the handicraft sector in Siem
Reap) in collaboration with the Provincial Government introduced a “Seal of Authenticity” to distinguishthe local products from imported items. According to AHA, tourists in Siem Reap spend an annual amountof about US$70 million on souvenir items. Further, 70 % of the tourists prefer locally produced items but
66 % of them are not able to identify which is local from the imported ones. Thus, local manufacturers,
artists and craftsmen are facing difficult competition from foreign traders in the operation of souvenir
businesses. Though this may be a disadvantage for local businessmen, the foreign traders also employ local
people.
The common experience of less developed countries during a tourism surge is that it has generated asignificant interest as a strategy to alleviate poverty (Hall, 2007). Tourism has been regarded as a solution to all
economic, social, and environmental issues. However, on a universal scale, there has been no empirical evidence
to corroborate the claim that tourism has in fact improved the living standards of the poor (Ibid).
Notwithstanding, struggling countries such as Cambodia still hold on to the tourism industry as a major
development tool.

3. Scope and limitations
This research was conducted to investigate the contribution of the souvenir business on the Siem
Reap community as part of the Angkor Wat heritage site during the time period of Sep.17th to Sep.25th. This
research looked into the effect of the souvenir business on income, employment and living conditions. It
included research analysis, research findings and recommendations on the basis of income, employment
and living conditions of people involved in the souvenir business.
This research is comparative. Data was collected from: Rohal, Ta Luas, BanteaySrei, PrasatBakong,72

SrasSrang, Nokor Thom sites in the Siem Reap community. The sample includes 18 producers and 37
sellers to get a cross-sectional view between producers and sellers. However, the collection of samples andselection of sites were limited because of time (one week), resources and group members to collect data. As
a result, the analysis, findings and recommendations may not reflect the whole community of Siem Reap.
The scope of sites was limited, and didn’t include larger souvenir markets, like the Night Market, toprovide a comprehensive representation of the souvenir business in Siem Reap.
Furthermore, regarding a comparative analysis of living conditions, the study concentrated mainlyon the average provincial data as related to the issue of electricity, schooling, houses, and latrines. Becauseof time and resource limitations, sample data was not collected from other sectors like agriculture,
construction etc. Therefore, there is a limitation of comparative analysis between the souvenir business andother sectors of the local community.

4. Methodology
4-1. Research site and data collection
The pre-determined research site was Siem Reap Province in Cambodia, one of the most popular tourist
destinations in Cambodia where, the Angkor Wat UNESCO World Heritage Site is located. However, theprovince of Siem Reap is a large area; necessitating that the study area be purposely narrowed down. In
accordance with the instructions of the Angkor Handicraft Association (AHA) and the other details of thesecondary sources, several villages and tourism sites were selected. The four (4) districts of Prasat Bakong,Banteay Srei, Varin, and Angkor Thom, and one municipality, Siem Reap, were selected and are highlighted in
the map.
Figure1: Map of the Research Site Condition

Source Google Map73

4-2. Research objectives
Investigate the contribution of the souvenir business on the income, employment and living
conditions of the Siem Reap community, and provide policy recommendations.

4-3. Research questions
What is the contribution of the souvenir business on the income, employment and living conditionsof the Siem Reap community?

4-3-1. Research Sub-Questions
1) What is the effect of the souvenir business on the income and employment generation of the Siem
Reap community?
2) What is the effect of the souvenir business on the local people’s living conditions of the Siem
Reap community?

4-4. Data Collection
Though the study is mainly based on primary data, secondary data also played a considerable role inthis study.
In accordance with the research objectives, three groups of people, namely (1) souvenir producers, (2)souvenir sellers/shop owners and, (3) government organizations were interviewed in order to collect bothquantitative and qualitative data. Other regulatory bodies were also interviewed. With regard to the samplingtechniques, in order to select the souvenir producers, the initial location was chosen by the Angkor Handicraft
Association (AHA) and advised by Professor Vuthy. Thereafter, the snow ball sampling technique was applied.
However, the convenience sampling method was employed to select the souvenir sellers/shop owners. In fact, inboth cases non-probability sampling methods have been applied due to time constraints and unavailability ofaccurate and updated sample frames for both souvenir producers and sellers.
Generally, primary data was collected through interviews, together with a prepared questionnaire, inorder to maintain reliable records and the accuracy of the interview. However, in some cases, interviews were
the only instrument of data collection. A detailed explanation about the data collection can be summarized asfollows:

74

Table 1: Primary Data Collection
Category of the Respondents

Data Collection
Techniques

SampleSize

Souvenir Producers

Interviews
Questionnaire

with

Souvenir Sellers/Shop Owners

Interviews
Questionnaire

with

AngkorHandicraft
Association (AHA)

Interview

2

APSARA Authority

Interview

2

Department of Tourism

Interview

2

Ministry of Culture & Fine
Arts

Interview

3

Sample Area

18

Rohal, Ta Luas

37

Rohal, Ta Luas, BanteaySrei, Prasat
Bakong, SrasSrang and AnokorThom.

Source: Field Survey

In addition to the primary data, the various kind of secondary data were collected from the sources suchas Siem Reap Commune Profile 2011 & 2012 and various websites related to the tourism in the Angkor Wat area
and Cambodia.
The following map provides a clear visualization of the research site, focusing the major temples aroundthe Siem Reap area.

Figure 2: Major Temples in the Research Site

Source Google Map

75

5. Conceptual framework and data analysis
The following diagram indicates the conceptual frame work of the research. It clearly depicts how thetourism industry link with the souvenir business followed by the wellbeing of the society. According to thefigure, both souvenir sellers and producers benefit from the tourism industry. The tourism industry accounts forboth local and foreign tourism sectors. The benefits to the souvenir sellers and producers can be mainly
identified in the context of income generation and employment generation. Ultimately, both income generationand employment generation enhance the living conditions of both souvenir producers and sellers.

Souvenir	
  IncomeProducers
Souvenir	  Employmen

Sellerst

Living	  Condition

Souvenir	  BusinessIndustry

Tourism	  Figure3: Conceptual Framework

Source: Created by Authors
The current study used a qualitative research design based on qualitative methods of data analysis.
Basic bar charts and pie charts have been used to show tendencies to define the first and second objectives,
while several radar graphs were used to define the third objective in order to compare living condition standards
with the provincial average data. Both primary and secondary data were concurrently used for the analysis
whenever necessary.

6. Results and discussion
6-1. Income
This survey firstly conducted to figure out the contribution of souvenir business on income. Analysis ofMain income sources, Contribution of Souvenir Income to the Total Family Income, Sufficiency of Souvenir
Income for Living, Saving Behavior have done step by step to deeply dig out the relationship between income
and souvenir business.

6-1-1 Main income sources of producers and sellers
The following figure indicates the main income source of 18 sellers and 37producers. The majority ofthe sellers which account for 92%, their main income sources are souvenir business. The sellers who are76engaging with other activities such as hotel workers, construction worker and farmers as the main income source
are negligible. The similar pattern can be seen for the producers’ as well. 72% of the producers’ the mainincome source is souvenir business and other income sources such as construction workers, cleaners and security
guards are very limited. Based on the sample we collected around Angkor Wat area, it is easy to find thatinterviewees’ household main income is come from souvenir business.
Figure4: Main Income Sources of Sellers and Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

A great deal of people heavily depends on the souvenir business by getting the benefit of world heritage
area of Angkor Wat. Since, the significant number of tourists visits this area throughout the year, the local
people have adopted to make their living by engaging with the souvenir business. In addition, easy of theaccessibility to the souvenir business and the less requirement of higher educational capacity further motivatethem to establish souvenir business. However, there is a risk of keeping more hopes on tourism based souvenir
business, because tourism is always very sensitive to the external factors such as global and local economic andpolitical conditions. Apart from that 29% of producers are engaging with other main income sources andallocating labor for souvenir production as the second choice. Their main objective is to allocate their free time
to make an extra income using their skills of producing souvenir related items.

6-1-2. Contribution of souvenir income to the total family income
The following graph clearly illustrates the contribution of souvenir income to total family income.
According to the graph, the majority of sellers earn more than 80% of their family income from the souvenir
business. In terms of producers, the contribution of souvenir income to the total household income of 9
producers (that is 50% of the producers) is 81%-100%. However, it is apparent that the income of producers isquite lower than that of sellers. Probably, based on our interview, producers have to face many problems such as
middle men’s activities in their way to find the market places. Consequently, income of the producers is77

basically at the lower level.
Figure5: Contribution of Souvenir Income to Total Family Incomeof Sellers and Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
The following bar graph compares the monthly per capita income versus per capita monthly souvenir
income of both sellers and producers. Monthly per capita income for the Siem Reap province was calculated byusing the household survey data collected from the commune profile. According to the calculation, it is 74.16
US$ per month. (Per capita income = total household income divided by # of household member)
Figure6: Per Person Monthly Souvenir Income Vs Per Capita Income (USD74.16) of Siem Reap
Province

MonthlyPer

CapitaIncome of Seim Reap
Province

74.16

Source: Field Survey Data and Commune Profile Data78

According to figure 6, it’s obvious that monthly income of most of the souvenir sellers is quite higher thanthe province monthly per capita income of 74.16 US$. However, all most all producers are earning even lessthan the monthly per capita income of Siem Reap province. Therefore, it is undoubtable that souvenir business ishighly favorable for the sellers rather than producers.

6-1-3. Sufficiency of souvenir income for living
The analysis aforementioned gives us evidence that souvenir business is vital for respondents’ family
income and most of the people who engage with souvenir business make more income than the provincial level.
However, is this amount of income enough for their basic daily needs or some extra consumption? In order tofigure out this question, we asked the interviewees’ opinion regarding the sufficiency of souvenir income.
Before looking the results, firstly figure 6 shows the income distribution of all the respondents. On the one hand,about half of them earn less than $100 per month, we doubt whether the income for this group of people
sufficient or not. On the other hand, almost half of respondents earn more than $100, and some sellers arecomparatively rich, which build up our confidence for the results of income sufficiency.
Figure 7: Monthly Profit of Sellers and Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

79

Figure 8: Sufficiency of Souvenir Income for Living

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

Not surprisingly, figure 7 illustrated that majority of the sellers and producers are earning sufficient
income for their living from the souvenir business. In term of meaning of living in their perspective, most ofthem mentioned the basic living needs, like food, clothes, children’s education, medical care and etc. However,still we found nearly 1/3 of the respondents do not have enough income for living. Couple with the number of
respondents in figure 8 shows that the majority can only earn less than $200 per month, which means most of
the people, can only meet the very basic needs of living. No need to mention the savings from souvenir industry
which we will specifically explain in the next part.

6-1-4. Savings behavior
As figure 9 indicates: in terms of souvenir sellers, 70% of them do not have any savings, while only
30% of sellers have savings; from the perspective of souvenir producers, 61% of them do not have any savings,
while only 39% producers have savings. Therefore, more than 50% of both souvenir producers and sellers whoare participating in souvenir business do not have savings.
Figure9: Saving Behavior of Sellers and Producers

Savings	
  of	
  Sellers

80
Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

Several factors are contributing to the low saving rate among the souvenir business participants in
Angkor Wat Heritage site. Firstly, according to the result from the field survey, to these producers and sellers,
most of the profit from souvenir business is used for daily expenses. In other words, those local people inAngkor Wat Heritage site cannot earn extra money from souvenir business to have savings. Secondly, thecharacteristics of souvenir business determine the low saving rate. The purchase expenses for souvenir products
are recurrent expenditure for sellers, while the material purchase account to a large part of producer’s revenue.
In order to pay those necessary expenses, some of them have to take loans. These characters determine thedifficulties of owning stable savings that souvenir participants meet. However, these local people tend to haveno savings, even if there are enough profit could be translated into a saving.

Figure10: Relationship between Income and Saving - Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

81

Figure11: Relationship between Income and Saving – Sellers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
As figure.10 and figure.1 indicate, it is difficult to identify the relationship between the two variables:
average monthly income and the degrees of savings. The two variables are not correlated, especially obvious in
the graph of sellers.
If nothing to fall back on for emergencies or retirement, it may threaten the social stability and hinder
economic problem. Savings act as an inducement for investment. It can also provide a safeguard for unexpected
expenditure and a source for future business ventures as capital.
Therefore, encouraging people to save from all income groups is important. However, poor people
usually have limited access to formal financial services, and people are forced to borrow money from expensive
informal lenders. At the same time, it is also increasing evidence that poor people are in risk when they save in
informal sector. Building a safe and successful savings system will need the resort from communities, banks aswell as government. Then all income groups will gradually fall into the habit of saving under the safe networkthat formal financial services support, meanwhile provide a security for the self-future.

6-2. Employment
In order to investigate the contribution of souvenir business on employment of local people, thisresearch focuses primarily on two indicators. One is the ratio of local people employed in souvenir business, andthe other is the hiring requirement for obtaining a job in the souvenir business.

6-2-1. The ratio of local people employed in souvenir business
Figure12 and figure13 explain the hiring policy of both producers and sellers. 89% of souvenir
producers do not have employees, while 22% of sellers hire employees. The different preference of hiring
82

employees among producers and sellers depends on the situation of research area.
Figure12: Percentage of Employee Hiring Choice—Sellers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

Figure13: Percentage of Employee Hiring Choice—Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

The research area, Angkor Wat Heritage Site is one of the most important tourism destinations inSouth-East Asia. On one hand, as the information provided by Provincial Department of culture and Fine Arts,
there are 580 souvenir shops in Siem Reap province, and mostly are grouped in Angkor Wat Heritage Site.
Among them, 21% shops are in large and medium scale, which needs a certain number of employees to deal
with a tourist influx as the research area is a tourist destination. However, on the other hand, according to theinformation from Provincial Department of culture, it can be known that around 70% of souvenirs sold in theseshops are imported from foreign countries, while only 30% of products are locally made. The limited demand of83

local souvenirs restricts the scale of souvenir producing, which will in turn lead to the family run operation
chosen by producers. They tend to arrange their own business by family members rather than hire employees.
To be specific, among the 22 percent sellers who have employees, 19 percent is accounted by local
employees while only 3 percent is occupied by the non-local employees. Among the 11 percent producers who
have employees, the whole number has been contributed by local employees. Therefore, souvenir businessprovides a better opportunity for the local people in term of employment generation.

6-2-2. The hiring requirements for obtaining a job in the souvenir business
As previously mentioned, 89% of producers have no employees, the second indicator-- the hiring
requirements for obtaining a job in the souvenir business is mainly based on the data collected from souvenir
sellers, and this indicator is measured by the requirement of skills and education for employees.
It can be learned from figure14, 65 percent of respondents considered that there is no special skills
required for working in souvenir business. Only 35 percent of respondents considered that some skills arenecessary, such as honesty, English ability and communication skills. One can draw the conclusion that there are
no requirements so as to what kinds of special skill are necessary, and the above is only some basic skills
required in service industry.
Figure14: Skill Required for Obtaining a Job in the Souvenir Business

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
In addition, the figure15 indicates that most of the respondents have elementary and junior high school
education and these two groups accounted more than 60 percent of total respondents. Therefore, specificrequirement in education is not requested in souvenir business too.

84

Figure15: Education Level of Respondents

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
In conclusion, the souvenir business in the Angkor Wat heritage site provides a better opportunity forthe local people in term of employment generation. It can be known from the findings above, whether producers
or sellers, most of them lean toward preferring to hire local people as the employee. Stand in the viewpoint of
employees hired by sellers, there is generally no specific requirement to be a sale staff in souvenir shops, except
for some basic skills, which is almost universal in service industry. By contrast, producers tend to have noemployees due to the small scale of business.
Moreover, it can be learned from the field survey that the craftsmanship is a trade handed down fromgeneration to generation, which limited the approach of outsiders. It is also evident that sellers do not neededucational background since the education levels of respondents are more centralized in lower levels. It can beconcluded that souvenir business provides more opportunities for the local people who have no specific skills
and low education level. In other words, the souvenir business in the Angkor Wat heritage site works tocontribute to the employment of local people.

6-3. Living conditions
6-3-1. Framework of living conditions
As shown in Figure 16, this study employed five indicators concerning living conditions; namely
housing, sanitation, electricity, education, and health. The indicator of health shows what producers and sellers
do when they get sick, while the sanitation indicator shows how many families in total have latrines. At the sametime, the number of houses owned by the sellers and producers will be included in the indicator of housing,while the indicator of education shows the percentage of sellers and producers that have attended schools.

85

Figure 16: Analysis Framework of Living Conditions

6-3-2. Actions of sickness
Figure17: Actions of Sickness

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
According to the survey, the majority of the sellers in souvenir business (56%) go to private clinics
when they become sick while 36% of them go to public health centres. In comparison, most of the producers go
to public health centres with the percentage of 75%, and just 15% and 10% go to pharmacies and private clinics,
respectively. This indicates that the sellers have more access to private health care than the producers.

866-3-3. Analysis of Living Conditions
Figure 18: Welfare of the Sellers and Producers

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey
Figure 18 shows the physical properties that belong to the sellers compared to the producers. As awhole, the sellers own more houses, bicycles, family cars and latrines compared to the producers. However, theproducers are considered better off, though not by much, in having motorcycles, TV, electricity, and education.
The whole picture of living conditions for the survey is shown in Figure 19. According to this survey,
almost all of the families involved in the souvenir business (both sellers and producers) possess their own houses
compared to 97.21% of families in Siem Reap province (PDP, 2012). What is more, 44% of the producers andsellers in the survey have their own latrines while that of the general Siem Reap population is 32.04%, according
to the provincial information. With regards to schooling, most people in the souvenir business (73.23%) havereceived education at schools, regardless of the number of years of schooling, compared to 69.10% of the total
population of Siem Reap. Next, compared to the provincial data which shows that only 26.58% of Siem Reap
families have access to electricity, 75.45% of the families in the samples utilize electricity in their homes.
Moreover, the survey also shows differences between families involved in souvenir business when it comes topossessing motorcycles, family cars, and TVs with the percentage of 86.5%, 5.5%, and 83.5%, respectively,
compared to the provincial average of 42.27%, 2.1%, and 58.72%. However, in terms of having bicycles, theindicator shows possession is less and yet that item does not show much value compared to cars andmotorcycles.

87Figure 19: Living Condition Analysis: Provincial Data and Survey% of families with motorcycles
100%

86.5%

% of families having latrine% of families with bicycles
42.27%

67.38%

44%

39.5%
32.04%

97.21%% of families having houses

0%

5.5%

% of families with family cars

2.10%

97%
69.10%

26.58%

73.23%

58.72%

83.5%% of schooling% of families with TV

75.45%% of families with electricity

Provincial Data

Survey Result

Source: Provincial Department of Planning, 2012

6-3-4. Local perception of the souvenir business
Based on the people involved in souvenir business, 68% of the sellers and 89% of the producers said
that such a business helps improve their living conditions, while just 24% of the sellers and a small proportion of
the producers (11%) answered negatively.

Figure 20: Perception of the Sample on Souvenir Business

Source: Calculated Based on Field Survey

7. Conclusions
The research was carried out with the objective of investigating the contributions of the souvenir
business on the community at the Angkor Wat UNESCO World Heritage Site in Siem Reap, Cambodia. We arenow enlightened on how the tourism-based souvenir business positively affects income, employment, and living
conditions of the local people living within and around the foremost important tourist attraction of Cambodia.
Our conclusions will point out what is common between producers and sellers of souvenirs, as well as the88pertinent differences, which were culled from our findings.

Income:The main income source for people living within the heritage site is from the souvenir business. This isa pragmatic consequence of opportunity that comes along with the benefits of tourism. It is important to note,however, that the sellers are gaining more income from the souvenir business than the producers. This is
supported by the fact that producers have to invest in a wider range of activities such as procurement of raw
materials, transport of products from production sites to the markets, wages of laborers for some, andamortizations for loans. This also does not discount family expenditures for basic needs such as food, medicalcare, and education. On the other hand, sellers may have the same expenditures as producers for theiroperational costs, but they can be flexible with the prices of their products that they sell in the market, which
gives them the opportunity to gain more.
As to sufficiency of income, the majority of producers and sellers find their income from the souvenir
business enough to support their basic needs. This is advantageous over the locals, who depend primarily on the
tourism potentials of their locality. It is alarming, though, that they do not have a culture of savings asestablished in the findings.

Employment:
The tourism industry in the Angkor Wat heritage site is working in favor of the local people in terms of
employment. Noteworthy in our findings is that shop owners and producers prefer to hire, either to workthroughout the production process of souvenir items or as sales staff. Generally, there is no age limitation for
those who engage in the production sector, except for some activities that require a minimum age because ofcontracts they sign with employers, as in the case of private entrepreneurs or companies. Moreover, there are noformal skills training required for either producers or sellers, especially in view of the family tradition of
inheriting the souvenir business. Most producers start engaging in handicrafts at a very early age and find thatthey continue the activity as their main source of living. It is also evident that on the part of sellers, they do nothave to have a formal educational to learn the art of attracting customers. With the exception of the English
classes, most local people engaged in souvenir business learned how to speak “sales-talk” through experience.

Living Conditions:
The souvenir business contributes positively to living conditions of those involved, and brings better
living standards compared to people living in Siem Reap, as a whole, due to the findings and the perception of
the local souvenir business people themselves. A majority of the people in the survey, especially sellers, canafford going to private clinics when they get sick. People in the souvenir business have better sanitation in termsof possessing more latrines. They also have better access to education, own houses, own more cars, motorcycles,
TVs, and have better access to electricity which shows the positive contribution of the souvenir business to the89community. However, the accessibility of electricity is geological, meaning that electricity is available in thecity and the areas around, but not the remote areas. Hence, this percentage cannot be generalized for all people
involved in the souvenir business since our sample site is just around the Angkor heritage sites, which arelocated in or very close to the city.
The local people engaged in the souvenir business have a better standard of living than those who areemployed in other sectors. This was inferred from the comparative analysis between the provincial data and our
findings on selected indicators including electricity, toilets, attendance in schools, and house ownership. Ourfindings showed that producers and sellers had a higher percentage of access or ownership of all four variables
compared with the provincial data. This may not be representative of the entire province because our researchsite involved only few villages, but this finding sheds some light on the actual situation. Further, this finding is
also limited to the indicators that we utilized namely electricity, toilet, attendance to schools, and houseownership.
As to the differences between producers and sellers, we found that more sellers utilize the services ofprivate health centers than producers. Relative to this, the frequency of sickness in sellers is higher than inproducers. The most common diseases are flu, fever, and diarrhea according to our survey. This is attributed tothe exposure of sellers to the environment of their workplace and to different customers.
In summary, the contributions of the tourism-based souvenir business to the local community in the
Angkor Wat heritage site are the following: (a) In terms of income, it is the main source of living and issufficient to meet their basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter; (b) With regard to employment, themajority of the population in the community are engaged in souvenir business; and (c) As to living conditions,the people engaged in the souvenir business whether as producers or sellers have better living conditions
compared to those in the other sectors, but only with regard to use of electricity, the presence of toilets,
attendance in sachools, and house ownership.

8. Recommendations
01. Since the saving rate of both sellers and producers is significantly low, it should be encouraged
to increase. In order to encourage saving, should be promoted through daily savings by getting the help of
the mobile savings promotion officers. In addition, gifts, attractive facilities and incentives should be
provided for reaching a considerable amount of savings. Lack of capital and living hand to mouth arecommon problems. For the future sustainability and further expansion of their businesses, savings provide
the needed capital for investment. Ultimately they will be self-dependent, changing their lives and society.
02. Since the income level is lower for producers compared to sellers’, there should be an
appropriate and updated programme to lift their income. It is better to facilitate better market places for the
producers by alleviating them from the middlemen, a solution which was mentioned by the producers at thetime of field interview in Rohal, Ta Luas, Banteay Srei, Prasat Bakong, Sras Srang, Nokor Thom villages.

9003. Many producers and sellers are looking for capital to expand their souvenir businesses but are
too poor to invest a large amount of money. Some live hand to mouth with the earnings from theirbusinesses. Souvenir producers need financial tools like interest-free loans and subsidies from thegovernment so they can start or invest in their businesses to increase production or establish their new
businesses.
04. The potential is high for souvenir businesses near the Angkor Wat heritage site, and therefore,
can be a very good employment opportunity for a new generation looking for jobs. Here the government
and NGOs should create a training program for unemployed young people to enable them to engage in thesouvenir business. Souvenir-related businesses are very attractive and growing in Siem Reap as the area isbecoming more popular for international tourists. Thus, the souvenir business is becoming a moresustainable economic activity in the area. In addition, the study revealed that the people who are working inthis business are happy with their profession and looking forward to a better future with the help ofauthorities.
05. Siem Reap is a rather new tourist destination and souvenirs are a newly growing business. But
the local souvenir business mainly depends on imported items from Thailand and Vietnam. As a result, thelocal producers are threatened. It is the responsibility of the government to set controls on the import offoreign souvenirs to protect this local industry.
06. Government and NGO assistance is needed to provide sanitation facilities and trainings. The
field study data reflects a concern for the condition (and in some cases the lack) of sanitation facilities
within the souvenir business. This is the overall situation in Siem Reap, giving the perception that people
are not giving the priority to sanitation facilities. Here we would like to remark that government and NGOs
have minimum intervention in this field, which causes other problems and limits the ability to have a better
life standard.
07. The government should come up with facilities for safe drinking water. The research revealed
that the people related with the souvenir business are struggling with access to safe drinking water. Mainly
from underground water sources, rain is the contributing source of drinking water. Some families enjoy
tube well water, but in general, people are still having problems securing safe drinking water. However, thesituation is changing with income levels, and people are becoming more and more aware about their lives.
08. In terms of access to health services, souvenir sellers are enjoying better quality of healthservices compared to producers. It indicates that souvenir sellers are earning more and are more conscious
about their health. It is because of their regular contact with urban people and tourists from different areasin the world. On the other hand, the souvenir sellers are living in more remote areas where awareness andknowledge of health is very hard to practice. Besides, the level of income for those families is not adequate
to spend on private health services.
09. The Ministry of Tourism, Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts, Apsara Authorities and AHA should
provide training about market channels. Through the field-work it was observed that souvenir sellers are not91knowledgeable about the market channels. They sell their souvenir to the middle-man who are coming to thevillages and buy their products. As a result, they are not getting the prices as per their expectations, which cause
them to remain poor. In addition, the availability of raw materials is decreasing and sometimes they need to buy
it with prices is increasing day by day. This in turn causes production costs to increase. To help alleviate thissituation, the Ministry of Tourism, Ministry of Culture & Fine Arts, APSARA and AHA can arrange sometraining programs to teach them about the market channels, the pricing policy and how to add the value to theirproducts for higher profits.

9. Acknowledgements
The tourism group (WG-04) would like to convey our sincere gratitude for our group advisor, Professor
Tetsuo Umemura, for his invaluable and friendly advices and encouragement at all stages of this research. We
would also like to thank professor NGOV Penghuy who coordinated the OFW program successfully and allother professors who enriched us by sharing their experiences at the OFW preparatory seminars.
The contribution of our counterparts, Professor Vuthy, Ms. Sreyrath Khoun and Ms. Lim Muyhong waso the key strength of our group during the fieldwork, and we appreciate their commitment to our study. In fact,
we could not have accomplished the activities efficiently and smoothly without their assistance. In addition, we
would like to sincerily thank all the officers in the Angkor-Wat Handicraft Association, APSARA Authority,
Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts and Department of Tourism who provided valuable information and data.
Last but not least, we would like to thank all our respondents who dedicated their time to our interviews
during the field work, followed by all other working group advisors and members who gave us importantcomments in order to complete the OFW program successfully.

9210. References:Angkor Handicraft Association, http://aha-kh.com/theseal.php.
Cambodia Tourism Performance (2012),
http://asiapacific.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/cambodia_tourism_performance.pdf

Hall, Michael C. (2007), Pro-Poor Tourism: Who Benefits?, Perspectives on Tourism and Poverty
Reduction, UK: Channel View Publications.
Siem Reap Recognized as Cultural City of East Asia,
http://www.opendevelopmentcambodia.net/siem-reap-recognized-as-cultural-city-of-east-asia-in-2012.
Siemreap.info, http://siemreap.info/local-craftsmen-to-trademark-products.

Siem Reap Tourism Department, http://siemreaptourism.gov.kh.
Sokhom, Pak (2009), Tourism of Cambodia, http://statistics.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/sokhom.pdf
Provincial Department of Planning (2012). Province Profile 2012: Siem Reap. For Local Development
Management Based on Village and Commune/Sangkat Data, December 2011. Provincial Department ofPlanning, March 2012.
UNWTO World Tourism Highlights 2012 (2013),
http://dtxtq4w60xqpw.cloudfront.net/sites/all/files/pdf/unwtohighlights13enlr.pdf.
UNDP (2012), http://jobs.undp.org/cj_view_job.cfm?cur_job_id=32638.

93

List of Individual and Company Donors to the Overseas Fieldwork Fund
(In order of receipt)

Year 1991
Otake Corportaion
Tsushima Kogyo Co., Ltd.
Tomita Co., Ltd.
Showa Seiyaku Co., Ltd.
Hotta Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd.
Sankichi Kondo, CPA
Nakamo Sun Route Co., Ltd.
Hayashi Yaokichi Co., Ltd.
Kazuo Oguri
Matsukazeya Co., Ltd.
Toyota Motor Corporation
The Kitankai
Hoyu Co., Ltd.
Daito Sanshin Co., Ltd.
Yamasei Sangyo Co., Ltd.
Tachibana Shouten Co., Ltd.
Asahi Kako Co., Ltd.

Taguchi Fukujukai Foundation
The Aichi Bank, Ltd.
The Bank of Nagoya, Ltd.
The Chukyo Bank, Ltd.
Aichi Steel Corporation
The Daisan Bank, Ltd.
Toyoda Machinary Corporation
Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc.
Okaya & Co., Ltd.
The Tokai Bank, Ltd.
Central Japan Railway Company
Nagoya Railroad Co., Ltd.
Toyota Industries Corporation
Japan Transcity Corporation
Takisada Co., Ltd.
The Hyakugo Bank, Ltd.
Shikishima Baking Co., Ltd.
Chuo Seisakusho, Ltd.
Toyoshima & Co., Ltd. Nagoya
headquarter
Toho Gas Co., Ltd.
Matsuzakaya Co., Ltd.
Maruei Department Store Co., Ltd.
Muto Shoukai Co., Ltd.
Yoshiyuki Hattori, CPA
Nagoya Mitsukoshi, Inc.
CPA Mitsuoka Akira Office
Howa Setsubi Kogyo Co., Ltd.
Kowa Company, Ltd.
Daido Steel Co., Ltd.
Sankyo Kasei Sangyo Co., Ltd.
NGK Spark Plug Co., Ltd.
NGK Insulators, Ltd.

Year 1992
Sintokogio, Ltd.
Dai Nippon Construction
TOENEC Corporation
Aichi Toyota Motor Co., Ltd.
The Tono Shinkin BankThe Juroku Bank, Ltd.
UNY Co., Ltd.
The Ogaki Kyoritsu Bank, Ltd.
Pacific Industrial Co., Ltd.
Toyoda Gosei Co., Ltd.
Nippondenso Co., Ltd.
Aisin Seiki Co., Ltd.
Toyota Tsusho Corporation

94

海外実地研修基金に拠出いただいた個人・企業一覧 （受け入れ順）
平成 3 年度
株式会社大竹製作所
津島興業株式会社
富田株式会社
昭和製薬株式会社
ホッタ設備工業株式会社
公認会計士	
  近藤三吉株式会社ナカモ・サンルート
株式会社林八百吉商店
小栗和夫

財団法人田口福寿会
株式会社愛知銀行
株式会社名古屋銀行
株式会社中京銀行
愛知製鋼株式会社
株式会社第三銀行
豊田工機株式会社
中部電力株式会社
岡谷鋼機株式会社
株式会社東海銀行

株式会社松風屋
トヨタ自動車株式会社
社団法人キタン会
ホーユー株式会社
大東三進株式会社
山清産業株式会社
株式会社立花商店
朝日化工株式会社

東海旅客鉄道株式会社
名古屋鉄道株式会社
株式会社豊田自動織機製作所
日本トランスシティ株式会社
瀧定株式会社
株式会社百五銀行
敷島製パン株式会社
株式会社中央製作所
豊島株式会社名古屋本社
東邦ガス株式会社
株式会社松坂屋
株式会社丸栄株式会社武藤商会
公認会計士	
  服部義之株式会社名古屋三越
公認会計士	
  光岡朗事務所
朋和設備工業株式会社
興和株式会社
大同特殊鋼株式会社
三協化成産業株式会社
日本特殊陶業株式会社
日本ガイシ株式会社

平成 4 年度
新東工業株式会社
大日本土木株式会社
株式会社トーエネック
愛知トヨタ自動車株式会社
東濃信用金庫株式会社十六銀行
ユニー株式会社
株式会社大垣共立銀行
太平洋工業株式会社
豊田合成株式会社
日本電装株式会社
アイシン精機株式会社
豊田通商株式会社

95