1 in 6 Children Experienced Cardiac Distress After Second Dosea summary by Craig Paardekooper

Link : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813456/ (Published Jan 5th 2023)
Procedure :•••••First Dose and First ECG Test : 5623 children received the first dose of Pfizer BNT162b, and were then tested by ECG
4 to 7 days passed
Second Dose : 5623 children then received the second dose of Pfizer BNT162b
2 to 3 days passed
Second ECG Test : 4576 children were tested by ECGResults :1047 Children Took Sick Leave After the Second Dose (and so were excluded from the study)
Note that only 4576 out of 5623 children came in for testing by ECG after the second dose. 1047 students took sickleave after the second dose and did not return to school for the second ECG screening. These 1047 students werethen excluded from the study – even though their sick leave may have been caused by the vaccine.
4576 children did return for the second ECG screening, and completed the study. Of these, 763 students (17.1%) hadat least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. 4 developed
myocarditis and arrhythmias.

Conclusions
The study concluded that Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine causes distress to the heart in 1 in 6 people vaccinated (17.1%)
after the second dose, which is 3 times worse compared to after the first dose.
This result was significant at a P value of less than 0.001, which means this was a very strong safety signal.
In addition to this, during the short time of the study (children were only monitored for 2-3 days after the secondvaccine), 4 children had already developed myocarditis or arrhythmia.

Unknown Dangers
It is UNKNOWN if more of the 17.1% of children who suffered cardiac symptoms, went on to develop myocarditis or
arrhythmia after the 2-3 day study period following the second dose. The health of these children was not followedup.
It is UNKNOWN how many of the 1047 children who claimed to be too ill to complete the study developed
myocarditis or arrhythmia during or after the 2-3 day study period following the second dose. The health status ofthese children was not followed up.
Safe and Effective ?
If 1047 children took sick leave within only 2-3 days of taking the second dose, and 17.1% of the remainder sufferedcardiac symptoms within only 2-3 days of taking the second vaccine, it appears that the vaccine cannot be “Safe andEffective” - so it is misinformation / criminal negligence by government and main-stream media to continue referringto these vaccines in this way. Their persistence in repeating this mantra suggests that their intention is to proceedregardless of harms caused (and also regardless of legality or moral constraint) – in other words, their intention is toharm.
This implication is compatible with the government sanctioned and deliberate censoring / deletion of thousands oftestimonies of severe injury and death from social media. Why is the government intent on deleting such safety
signals – unless their intention is to harm.
All of these testimonies were deleted by Facebook - see https://howbad.info/facebooktestimonies.pdf
The safest and most effective treatment is –•••to exercise caution with these mRNA vaccines
to exercise caution with other untested mRNA vaccines
to exercise caution regarding government motives and intent