JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

JCM Validation Report Form
A. Summary of validation
A.1. General Information
Title of the projectIntroduction of High Efficiency Looms in Weaving
Mill

Reference number

ID 020Third-party entity (TPE)

Japan Quality Assurance Organization (JQA)(TPE-ID-003)

Project participant contracting the TPE

Nisshinbo Textile Inc.

Date of completion of this report

27/02/2019

A.2 Conclusion of validation
Overall validation opinion

Positive
Negative

A.3. Overview of final validation conclusion
Only when all of the checkboxes are checked, overall validation opinion is positive.
Item
Validation requirements
No CAR or CL
remaining
Project design The TPE determines whether the PDD was completed using
document form
the latest version of the PDD forms appropriate to the typeof project and drafted in line with the Guidelines forDeveloping the Joint Crediting Mechanism (JCM) Project
Design Document, Monitoring Plan and Monitoring Report.
Project
The description of the proposed JCM project in the PDD is
description
accurate, complete, and provides comprehension of the
proposed JCM project.
Application of The project is eligible for applying applied methodology andapproved JCM that the applied version is valid at the time of submission of
methodology
the proposed JCM project for validation.
(ies)
Emission
All relevant GHG emission sources covered in thesourcesand methodology are addressed for the purpose of calculating
calculationof project emissions and reference emissions for the proposedemission
JCM project.
reductions
The values for project specific parameters to be fixed ex ante
listed in the Monitoring Plan Sheet are appropriate, if
applicable.
Environmental
The project participants conducted an environmental impact
impactassessment, if required by the Republic of Indonesia, in line
assessmentwith Indonesia’s procedures.
Local
The project participants have completed a local stakeholder
stakeholder
consultation process and that due steps were taken to engage
1JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

B. Validation team and other experts

Name

Company

Function*

Mr.
Tadashi
JQA
Team leader
Ms.
YoshidaMr.
Irhan
External
Team
Ms.
Febijanto
individual
memberMr.
SachikoInternal
JQA
Ms.
Hashizume
Reviewer
Please specify the following for each item.

Schemecompetence*

Technical
competence*On-sitevisit

Authorized
Authorized
Authorized* Function: Indicate the role of the personnel in the validation activity such as team leader, teammember, technical expert, or internal reviewer.
* Scheme competence: Check the boxes if the personnel have sufficient knowledge on the JCM.
* Technical competence: Indicate if the personnel have sufficient technical competence related
to the project under validation.

C. Means of validation, findings, and conclusion based on reporting requirements
C.1. Project design document form
<Means of validation>
The PDD form was checked and confirmed as complete in accordance with the JCM
Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report (JCM_ID_GL_
PDD_MR_ver03.0). The latest version of the JCM PDD form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver02.0) is
used for the PDD of the proposed project (Version 01.0 dated 30/10/2018 for the first edition
and Version 02.0 dated 31/01/2019 for Second edition).

The validation was conducted on

the first edition of the PDD.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the PDD is completed using the valid version of the PDD form anddrafted in line with the JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document andMonitoring Report.
C.2. Project description<Means of validation>
The purpose of the project is to achieve GHG emission reductions by replacing the existing3

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

weaving looms with highly efficient air jet looms at an existing textile factory.

The project islocated at the factory of PT. Nikawa Textile Industry in Karawang Regency, West Java
Province, Indonesia, and has installed 81 units of the latest model air jet looms, i.e., JAT810,
made by Toyota Industries Corporation.

Toyota JAT810 is able to reduce air consumption

for weft insertion by more than 15% compared to the conventional model (JAT710) and thiseffect contributes to the reduction of CO2 emission from the power consumption of aircompressors.

Thus, the proposed project would achieve 430 tCO2 of the annual emission

reductions and 3,010 tCO2 of emission reductions for the period of 2018 – 2025.
The air-saving of more than 20% of the latest model air jet loom (JAT810) has beenachieved with modification of weft insertion system and the combined use of newly developed
e-REED and sub nozzle.

The sub nozzle consumes 90% of air supplied by air compressor.

Thus, the reduction of both air pressure and air volume contributes not only to the reduction of
CO2 emission from the power consumption of air compressor but also to the reduction ofrunning cost.
The proposed project is implemented by PT. Nikawa Textile Industry from Republic ofIndonesia and Nisshinbo Textile Inc. from Japan. The installation of JAT810 was commenced
in 2016 and satisfactorily completed in June 2018, which is supported by the Certificate ofConfirmation signed by PT. Nikawa Textile Industry and Toyota Industries Corporation.

The

starting date of the monitoring activity was set to 01/07/2018 after the complete installation of
81 units of JAT810. The expected operational lifetime of the project is 7 years, which is basedon the statutory useful life of the proposed technology according to National Tax
Administration Agency of Japan.
The proposed project was partially financed by Ministry of the Environment, Japan,
through the Financing Programme for JCM model projects, which provides financial supportof less than half of the initial investment for the projects in order to acquire JCM credits.
Further, Nisshinbo Textile Inc. has promoted technology transfer through OJT training on theoperation and maintenance of JAT810 for the engineering staffs of PT. Nikawa Textile Industry.
JQA has assessed the PDD and the supporting documents through the desk review and onsite assessment conducted on 16/01/2019 to validate the requirements about accuracy andcompleteness of the project description.

The details of the persons interviewed anddocuments reviewed are provided in Section E of this report.
Regarding the starting date of project operation and the expected operation lifetime of the
project, JQA raised CL 01 and this issue was resolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>
4

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0< CL 01 >The PPs are requested to justify the starting date (01/01/2017) and operational lifetime (9years) of the proposed project based on the supporting documents.
< Resolution by the PPs >The starting date of the project activity is set after all of the 81 air jet looms subject to theJCM model project are installed.
has been revised accordingly.

The determined starting date is 1st July 2018.

The PDD

Also, the operational lifetime of the project is set to 7 years

based on the statutory useful life of the proposed technology according to National Tax
Administration Agency of Japan.
https://www.keisan.nta.go.jp/survey/publish/34255/faq/34311/faq_34360.php< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the interview with thePPs that the starting date of the project activity was set to 01/07/2018 after the installation of
81 units of JAT810 was completed on 29/06/2018.

It is also confirmed through the review of

the relevant document from National Tax Administration Agency of Japan that the lifetime ofthe project facility is determined to 7 years. Thus, CL 01 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the description of the proposed project in the revised PDD complies
with the supporting documents and information obtained through the desk review, on-site visit
and the interview with the PPs, and the description is accurate and complete.

C.3. Application of approved methodology(ies)<Means of validation>
The approved methodology JCM_ID_AM011_ver01.0 "Installation of energy saving air jetloom at textile factory, Version 01.0" is applied to the proposed project.

The methodology isapproved by the JC on 10/02/2017 (JC6, Annex 3) and valid at the time of the validation.
JQA has assessed whether the selected methodology is applicable to the proposed project.
The project applicability was checked against two eligibility criteria contained in the approved
methodology.

The project information for each eligibility criterion and the assessment/

conclusion about its applicability to the proposed project are summarized in the following table.
Eligibility
criteria

Descriptions specified in
the methodology

Project information

5

Assessment
conclusion

andJCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Criterion
1

Criterion
2

The project replaces
existing air jet looms at aweaving factory with air
jet looms equipped withenergysavingtechnologies such as an
optimized shape reed’stunnel of nozzles and apressure
sensortomeasure air pressure of
nozzles for optimizationofcompressedairconsumption of welt
insertion.

The project replaces
existing air jet looms at aweaving factory with
JAT810,which
areequipped with energy
saving technologies suchas an optimized shapereed’s tunnel of nozzles
and a pressure sensor tomeasure air pressure of
nozzles for optimizationofcompressedairconsumption of welt
insertion.

It is confirmed throughthe review of therelevant documents, theon-site inspection andthe interview with thePPs that the existing air
jet looms at PT. Nikawa
Textile Industry havebeen replaced withhighly efficient air jet
looms (Toyota JAT810)
which is equipped with
optimized shape reed’stunnel of nozzles and asensor to monitor airpressure of nozzles forcontrolling the air
consumption of welt
insertion. Hence, theproposed project meets
Criterion 1.

The air jet looms which
are installed by the
project reduce thespecific air consumption
by at least 15%
compared with thereference air jet looms inline with the description
in Section I of thismethodology.

The air jet looms JAT810
which are installed by the
project reduce the specificair consumption by morethan 15％ compared withthe reference air jet looms.

It is confirmed throughthe review of therelevant documents, theon-site inspection andthe interview with thePPs that JAT810 is able
to reduce the specific air
consumption by about
20% compared to thereference air jet looms(JAT710). Hence, theproposed project meets
Criterion 2.

<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
JQA concludes that the proposed project is eligible for applying the valid version of themethodology ID_AM011_ver01.0 and all eligibility criteria have been met by the proposed
project.

C.4. Emission sources and calculation of emission reductions<Means of validation>6

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

The proposed project aims to reduce CO2 emissions from electricity consumption by air
compressor which supplies the compressed air to air jet looms at the textile factory where theexisting air jet looms (JAT710) have been replaced with highly efficient air jet looms (JAT810).
The implementation of the proposed project is expected to reduce the air consumption by morethan 15% compared to the reference air jet loom.

Reference emissions are sourced from theelectricity consumption by air compressors for the reference air jet looms (JAT710) and projectemissions are sourced from the electricity consumption by air compressor for the project air jet
looms (JAT810).
Reference emissions are calculated by Equation (1), in accordance with the methodology
ID_AM011:
REp = ∑(SECj x ∑(SACPJ,iI,j x APPJ,I,j,p) / (1 – RRi,j /100) x EFelec,j ) -----------(1)

Where:REp: Reference emissions during the period p [tCO2/p]

SECj: Specific electricity consumption of the air compressors at the project
factory j [kWh/Nm3]

SACPJ,I,j : Specific air consumption of the project air jet loom type i at the project
factory j [Nm3/m]
RRi,j: Reduction rate of specific air consumption of the project air jet loom type iat the project factory j [%]APPJ,I,j,p: Amount of fabric woven by the project air jet loom type i at the project
factory j during the period p [m/p]EEelec,j: CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity at the project factory j[tCO2/kWh]i: Identification number of the project air jet loom type, differentiatedaccording to, for example, modelsj: Identification number of the project factory

The default values of SECj, SACPJ,I,j and RRi,j, project-specific parameter to be fixed exante, used in the calculation of reference emissions for electricity consumption of the aircompressor are 0.1005kWh/Nm3, 1.74Nm3/m and 20.0%, respectively, which were determinedby the experiments.

The value of EEelec,j is 0.000877 tCO2/kWh for JAMALI grid (ex-postvalue) which is sourced from “Emission Factor of Electricity Interconnection Systems (2016)”,
National Committee on Clean Development Mechanism (Indonesian DNA for CDM), basedon data obtained by Directorate General of Electricity, Ministry of Energy and Mineral7

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Resources, Indonesia.
Project emissions are calculated by Equation (2), in accordance with the methodology
ID_AM011:
PEp = ∑(SECj x ∑(SACPJ,iI,j x APPJ,I,j,p) x EFelec,j )------------------ (2)Where:PEp: Project emissions during the period p [tCO2/p]

SECj: Specific electricity consumption of the air compressors at the project
factory j [kWh/Nm3]

SACPJ,I,j : Specific air consumption of the project air jet loom type i at the project
factory j [Nm3/m]
APPJ,I,j,p: Amount of fabric woven by the project air jet loom type i at the project
factory j during the period p [m/p]EEelec,j: CO2 emission factor for consumed electricity at the project factory j[tCO2/kWh]i: Identification number of the project air jet loom type, differentiatedaccording to, for example, modelsj: Identification number of the project factory

Thus, the GHG emission reductions during the period p are calculated by Equation (3), inline with the approved methodology:
ERp = REp – PEp--------------------(3)

The ex-ante value of the monitoring parameter (APPJ,I,j,p) used in the calculation of emission
reductions in the MPS are estimated based on the monitoring data of fabric woven during theperiod of March - May 2018.

As a result, 11,225,759 m of fabric woven is estimated for the

proposed project.
Thus, the annual emission reductions are calculated as follows:
ERp = REp – PEp= ∑(SECj x ∑(SACPJ,iI,j x APPJ,I,j,p) / (1 – RRi,j /100) x EFelec,j ) –∑(SECj x ∑(SACPJ,iI,j x APPJ,I,j,p) x EFelec,j )= (0.1005 x 1.74 x 11,225,759 / (1-20.0/100) x 0.000877) –(0.1005 x 1.74 x 11,225,759 x 0.000877)

8

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0= 430 tCO2
The annual GHG emission reductions are estimated to be 430 tCO2 and the sum of theemission reductions for the period of 2018 – 2025 is estimated to be 3,010 tCO2.
It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents and on-site assessment that all
GHG emission sources specified by the applied methodology are identified, and the reference
emissions (REp), project emissions (PEp) and emission reductions (ERp) in the PDD (ver.2.0)
and Monitoring Plan Sheet are correctly calculated, in accordance with the methodology
ID_AM011_ver01.0.
Regarding the values of SECj and RRi.j to be fixed ex-ante and the value of APPJ,i,j to bemonitored ex-post in the MPS, JQA raised CL 04, CL 05 and CL 06 and these issues wereresolved as explained in “Findings”.
<Findings>< CL 04 >Methodology ID_AM011 requires that the most conservative value of SECj at the project
factory is selected from the multiple air compressors.

The PPs are requested to clarify how

30.1011 kWh/Nm for SECj is determined.
< Resolution by the PPs >The value of SECj has been revised to 0.1005 kWh/Nm3, in accordance with the applied
methodology ID_AM011.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the revised MPS that themost conservative value of SECj, i.e., 0.1005 kWh/Nm3, was selected among three aircompressors used at the project factory.

Thus, CL 04 is closed.

< CL 05 >The methodology ID_AM011 requires that the value of RRi,j at the project factory is fixed
as an average of reduction rate of specific air consumption for each fabric type woven as per
project air jet loom type. The PPs are requested to clarify how 20% for RRi.j is determined.
< Resolution by the PPs >The PPs selected the value of 20% as the default value for RRi,j, based on the Toyota JAT
810 catalogue which showed the expected minimum value of air reduction ratio compared to9JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

the previous model JAT710.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents issued by the manufacturer
that the project air jet loom (JAT810) is able to save significant air consumption over 20% by
the combined use of newly developed sub nozzle and e-REED, compared to the existing air jet
looms (JAT710). Furthermore, this value (20%) is smaller than the average of reduction rateof specific air consumption for each fabric type woven (23.2%) and therefore it is conservative.
Thus, CL 05 is closed.
< CL 06 >PP is requested to clarify why the value of 1.5 times as large as the total fabric woven
production obtained during March-May 2018 is applied for the ex-ante estimates of APPJ,I,j,p in
the proposed project.
< Resolution by the PPs >The fabric woven production obtained from March to May 2018 represents the fabricwoven production by 54 units of the air jet looms.

The multiplying factor of 1.5 was appliedin the ex-ante estimation for the amount of fabric woven production for 81 units of air jet looms.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents and the interview with the PPsthat the multiplying factor of 1.5 (=81/54) comes from the ratio of the installed number of air
jet looms before and after the completion of installation of 81 units in June 2018.

Thus, CL

06 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
JQA confirms that all emission sources and GHG types specified in the approved
methodology are appropriately identified.

JQA concludes that the value of parameter(APPJ,I,j,p) to be monitored ex-post in the MPS is correctly estimated based on the historical dataof fabric woven, and the values of the project-specific parameters to be fixed ex-ante listed in
the MPS (SECj, SACPJ,i,j and RRi,j) are also correctly determined by the experiments.

Further,the equations to calculate reference emissions, project emissions and emission reductions forthe proposed project are appropriately derived and the annual emission reductions are correctly
calculated using parameters and data in the MPS.

10

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.5. Environmental impact assessment<Means of validation>
The proposed project is to reduce CO2 emissions from electricity consumption of aircompressor by replacing the existing air jet loom with the highly efficient air jet loom at the
textile factory.

The PDD states that an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is not

required, because the proposed project does not conduct a physical development with an impact
to the society as well as the environment around the project site.

According to the Ministryof Environment decree no 05 year 2012 and the EIA Guidebook for Japanese Companies inOverseas Business Development, published by Institute for Global Environmental Strategies(IGES) on March 2015, there is no stipulation which requires EIA assessment to such kind of
the technology implementation.

Therefore, JQA confirms that EIA is not required.

Regarding the EIA in Indonesia, JQA raised CL 03 and this issue was resolved as explainedin “Findings”.
<Findings>< CL 03 >The PPs are requested to explain the reason why EIA is not required for the proposed
project.
< Resolution by the PPs >Based on the Ministry of Environment decree no 05 year 2012 regarding activities which
requires EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment), the proposed JCM project is not subject tothe EIA.
< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the Ministry of Environment decree no 05 year 2012and EIA Guidebook for Japanese Companies in Overseas Business Development published by
IGES that the type of the proposed project does not require the EIA.

Thus, CL 03 is closed.

<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the proposed project does not require the EIA.

The implementationof the project is in line with the regulations in the Republic of Indonesia and the requirementsof the JCM.

11

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.6. Local stakeholder consultation<Means of validation>
The PPs conducted a local stakeholder consultation under the EIA at PT. Nikawa Textile
Industry in Kabupaten Karawang on 04/09/2018.

Prior to the meeting, the invitation letter

was delivered to the stakeholders on 08/08/2018.
The list of the participants for Local Stakeholders’ Consultation Meeting is as follows:- Indonesia JCM Secretariat- Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs (CMEA)- Directorate of Energy Conservation, Directorate General of New Renewable Energy andEnergy Conservation, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia (MEMR)- Center for Research and Development for Green Industry and Environment (PPIHLH),
Ministry of Industry of Indonesia- Indonesia Textile Association (API)- Production and Industry Bureau, West Java Province- Energy and Mineral Resources Agency, West Java Province- Nisshinbo Textile Inc.
- Toyota Industries Corporation- PT. Anugerah Texindotama- PT. Nikawa Textile Industry- Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co., Ltd.
The local stakeholders provided positive comments for the proposed project.

No negative

issues that require actions to be taken by the PPs were raised through the consultation.

It isconfirmed through the review of the relevant documents and the interview with the PPs thatthe stakeholder consultation process was appropriately conducted to collect stakeholders’opinions on the project.

The summary of the comments received in the consultation and due

account of all comments taken by the PPs are fully described in the PDD.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the PPs have completed a local stakeholder consultation process under
the EIA and invited comments on the proposed project from the local stakeholders.

Thesummary of the comments received is provided in the PDD in a complete manner and the PPs
have taken due account of all the comments received and described this process in the PDD.

12

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

C.7. Monitoring<Means of validation>
The Monitoring Plan consists of the Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet
which comply with the approved Methodology JCM_ID_AM011_ver01.0.

A monitoring

parameter, i.e., amount of fabric woven by the project air jet loom type i at the project factoryj during the period p (APPJ,i.j,p), is measured by the meter installed to the project air jet loom.
The amount of the fabric woven by each loom is recorded in the PC server located in the control
room as illustrated by the figure in Section C.2 of the PDD.
The monitoring parameter of APPJ,I,j,p is monitored every production lot and aggregatedmonthly.

The aggregated data is double-checked by a responsible staff on a monthly basis toprevent the missing of data.

The calibration of the meter is not required as per the

methodology ID_AM011 which states that the fabric is a commercial commodity undercontract with a client and is subject to an accurate measurement.
The roles and responsibilities of the personnel are described in Monitoring Structure
Sheet.

The monitoring structure consists of Plant Engineer, Project Engineer and ProjectManager.

Plant Engineer is in charge of data collection, checking of monitoring equipment

and keeping/archiving monitored data. Project Engineer is in charge of emission reduction
calculation.

Project Manager is responsible for the project planning, monitoring result andreporting.

All monitored data which are required for verification and issuance is kept andarchived for two years after the final issuance of credits.
It is confirmed through the review of the relevant documents, on-site inspection and theinterview with the PPs that the monitoring plan complies with the requirements of the approved
methodology and the PPs are able to implement the monitoring activity appropriately according
to the monitoring plan.
Regarding the location of the monitoring point 1, JQA raised CL 02 and this issue wasresolved as explained in "Findings".
<Findings>< CL 02 >The PPs are requested to illustrate the location of monitoring point 1 clearly whichmonitors total length of fabric woven production in Figure of Section C.2.
< Resolution by the PPs >The PDD has been revised and the location of monitoring point 1 for total length of fabricwoven production is now clearly indicated in the figure of C.2.
13

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0< Assessment by the TPE >It is confirmed through the review of the revised PDD that the monitoring point 1 for themonitoring parameter of APPJ,I,j,p is appropriately revised in the figure of Section C.2.

Thus,

CL 02 is closed.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Please state conclusion based on reporting requirements.
JQA concludes that the description of the MPS is based on the methodology ID_AM011
and JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report, and themonitoring point as well as measuring equipment is also appropriate.

Thus, the PPs havedemonstrated feasibility of the monitoring structure and their abilities to implement themonitoring activity appropriately.

C.8. Modalities of Communication<Means of validation>
The MoC was provided to JQA for review on 07/01/2019, in the valid form
(JCM_ID_F_MoC_ver01.0) at the time of validation, in which Nisshinbo Textile Inc. isnominated as the focal point.

The MoC was signed by the authorized representatives of PT.

Nikawa Textile Industry on 03/09/2018 and by the authorized representatives of Nisshinbo
Textile Inc. on 03/09/2018, along with the contact details.
JQA has checked the personal identities including specimen signatures and employment
status of the authorized signatories directly through the interview with the PPs during on-site
assessment.

Primary authorized signatory of Nisshinbo Textile Inc. is Director, and alternate

authorized signatory is Senior Manager of Production Control Department.

Primaryauthorized signatory of PT. Nikawa Textile Industry is President, and alternate authorized
signatory is Director of Weaving Department.
It is confirmed that all corporate and personal details including specimen signatures and theinformation in the MoC are valid and accurate as requested in the JCM Guidelines for
Validation and Verification.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the MoC is completed using the valid version of the form, and the14

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

information and the specimen signature of the PPs provided in the MoC are correct andsufficient, in compliance with the requirements of the JCM Guidelines.

It is demonstrated

that the MoC is correctly completed and dully authorized.

C.9. Avoidance of double registration<Means of validation>
The representative of focal point entity in the MoC, Director of Production Control
Department of Nisshinbo Textile Inc., declares that the proposed project is not registered under
any other international climate mitigation mechanism other than the JCM.

It is confirmed

through the check of publicly available information (e.g. CDM/JI website, etc.) that the
proposed project is not registered under any other international climate mitigation mechanisms
in terms of the name of entity, applied technology, scale and location.

Thus, it can beconcluded that the proposed project will not result in double counting of GHG emission
reductions.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the proposed project is not registered under any other international
climate mitigation mechanisms and hence will not result in double counting of GHG emission
reductions.

C.10. Start of operation<Means of validation>
For the proposed project, the commissioning of the project facilities was satisfactorily
completed on 29/06/2018 and the starting date of monitoring activity was set to 01/07/2018.
It is confirmed through the review of relevant documents, on-site assessment and the interview
with the PPs that the starting date of the proposed project given in the PDD, 01/07/2018, wasdetermined as the date which the monitoring activity of the project operation actuallycommenced.
<Findings>
No issue was raised to the requirement.

15

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
JQA concludes that the starting date of project operation, 01/07/2018, is correct and does
not predate 01/01/2013 as required by the Guideline of the JCM project.

C.11. Other issues<Means of validation>
No more issues are raised in the validation of the proposed project.
<Findings>
Not applicable.
<Conclusion based on reporting requirements>
Not applicable.

D. Information on public inputs
D.1. Summary of public inputs
In line with the JCM Project Cycle Procedure, the PDD was made publicly available for 30days from 26/12/2018 to 24/01/2019 to invite public comments on the following JCM website:
https://www.jcm.go.jp/id-jp/projects/58
No public comments were received.

D.2. Summary of how inputs received have been taken into account by the project participants
Not applicable.

E. List of interviewees and documents received
E.1. List of interviewees- Ryuichi OIKAWA

President Director, PT. Nikawa Textile Industry- Ryuji SHIBATA

Director, PT. Nikawa Textile Industry-

Senior Manager, Nisshinbo Textile Inc.

Yoshiyuki KATAYAMA16

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0- Chisato NAKADE

Senior Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
Co., Ltd.

- Ricky Tagar Risnauli

Senior Consultant, Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities
Co., Ltd.

E.2. List of documents received
1. PDD, ver. 01.0, 30/10/2018, ver. 02.0, 31/01/2019
2. Monitoring Plan Sheet and Monitoring Structure Sheet, ver. 01.0, 30/10/2018,ver. 02.0, 31/01/2019
3. JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (MoC) dated 21/12/2018
4. JCM Approved Methodology ID_AM011_ver01.0, 10/02/2017, JC6, Annex 3
5. JCM Glossary of Terms (JCM_ID_Glossary_ver02.0)
6. JCM Project Cycle Procedure (JCM_ID_PCP_ver05.0)
7. JCM Modalities of Communication Statement Form (JCM_ID_F_MoC_ver01.0)
8. JCM Guidelines for Developing Project Design Document and Monitoring Report(JCM_ID_GL_PDD_MR_ver03.0)
9. JCM Project Design Document Form (JCM_ID_F_PDD_ver02.0)
10. JCM Guidelines for Validation and Verification (JCM_ID_GL_VV_ver01.0)
11. JCM Validation Report Form (JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0)
12. Outline of Nisshinbo textile project13-1. Business plan of JCM project “Introduction of High Efficiency Looms in WeavingMill”
13-2. Report on the implementation of JCM project “Introduction of High Efficiency Looms
in Weaving Mill”
14. Company profile of PT. Nikawa Textile Industry
15. Company profile of Nisshinbo Textile Inc.
https://www.nisshinbo.co.jp/profile/pdf/corporate_profile.pdf
16. Catalogue of air jet loom JAT810 manufactured by Toyota Industries Corporation
17-1. Confirmation of installation of 27 units of JAT 810 (JA2S-190ES-EF-T810) at PT.
Nikawa Textile Industry on 01/12/2016
17-2. Confirmation of installation of 27 units of JAT 810 (JA2S-190ES-EF-T810) at PT.
Nikawa Textile Industry on 08/09/2017
17-3. Confirmation of installation of 27 units of JAT 810 (JA2S-190ES-EF-T810) at PT.
Nikawa Textile Industry on 29/06/2018
18. Statutory useful life the equipment according to National Tax Administration Agency of
Japan
17

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0(http://elaws.egov.go.jp/search/elawsSearch/elaws_search/lsg0500/detail?lawId=340M50
000040015_20180401_430M60000040031&openerCode=1)
19. Air consumption data of JAT710 and JAT810 for each category
20. Schematic diagram of monitoring structure including information and data flow
21. Invitation letter for LSC meeting dated 08/08/2018
22. Minutes of LSC meeting on 04/09/2018
23. MRV of the project presented at the LSC meeting
24. LSC attendance list
25. Introduction of Toyota project technologies
26. Inspection record of No.2 turbo compressor (TRE50-500kW) issued by IHI Corp. dated
July 2004
27. Inspection record of No.3 turbo compressor (TRA40-400kW) issued by IHI Corp. dated
Dec 2010
28. Inspection record of No, 5 turbo compressor (TRE50-500kW) issued by IHI Corp. dated
Nov 2007
29. Documents on the determination of SACPJ,i,j and RRi,j to be fixed ex-ante and APPJ,Ii,j,p tobe monitored ex-post
30. Documents on the determination of SECj to be fixed ex-ante
31. 2016 CO2 emission factor of the grids in Indonesia, sourced from “Emission Factors ofElectricity Interconnection Systems”, National Committee on Clean Development
Mechanism (Indonesian DNA for CDM).
32. Sample of daily monitoring data of fabric woven in July 201833. Ministry of Environmental decree No.5: 2012
34. Indonesia EIA Guidebook issued by IGES, March 201518

JCM_ID_F_Val_Rep_ver01.0

Annex Certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technicalexperts and internal technical reviewers
Please attach certificates or curricula vitae of TPE’s validation team members, technical experts
and internal technical reviewers.
Statement of competenceStatement of competence
Name:

Name:

Dr. Tadashi Yoshida

Dr. Irhan FebijantoQualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function

Function

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
Validator

2014/12/22

Validator (JCM project only)

2017/8/21

Verifier

2014/12/22

Verifier (JCM project only)

2017/8/21

Team leader

2014/12/22

Team leader-

T echnical area within sectoral scopes

T echnical area within sectoral scopes

Date of qualification

Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2014/12/22

TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

TA 1.2. Renewables

2014/12/22

TA 1.2. Renewables

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2014/12/22

TA 3.1. Energy demand

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production

2015/11/12

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production-

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries

2014/12/22

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries-

TA 5.1. Chemical industry

2014/12/22

TA 5.1. Chemical industry-

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas

2014/12/22

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas-

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater

2014/12/22

TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation-

TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation-

Statement of competence
Name:

Ms. Sachiko Hashizume

Qualified and authorized by Japan Quality Assurance Organization.

Function
Date of qualification
Validator

2015/11/20

Verifier

2015/11/20

Team leader

2018/6/22

Technical area within sectoral scopes
Date of qualification
TA 1.1. Thermal energy generation

2015/11/20

TA 1.2. Renewables

2015/11/20

TA 3.1. Energy demand

2015/11/20

TA 4.1. Cement and lime production-

TA 4.6. Other manufacturing industries-

TA 5.1. Chemical industry-

TA 10.1. Fugitive emissions from oil and gas
TA 13.1. Solid waste and wastewater
TA 14.1. Afforestation and reforestation

2015/11/20-

19

2014/12/22
2014/12/22